The David Knight Show - 19Oct23 Govt Admits — Elites Given Jab Exemptions

Episode Date: October 19, 2023

Massive, unprecedented financial fraud accompanied the lockdown, PPP, and other programs to train us for 2030 Universal Basic Income (UBI). They even allocated a massive amount of money to investigate the fraud beforehand but it too was wasted money (3:01)"Professor Lockdown" who produced the excuse for Trump, BoJo, and other leaders to lock the world down is now trying to distance himself from the lie. (13:24)NZ Elites Got Jab Exemption, Where Jab Mandates Were Most Draconian Not even people who had a severe adverse reaction were given an exemption from the vaccine mandate — but 1/5 of "public servants" who were deemed "vital" were given exemptions the New Zealand government has admitted. They knew. It was NOT a mistake (20:21) Ozempic and other weight loss drugs are scaring junk food companies with lost profits. But you should look into a very dark side to the diet injections (40:52) Netflix moving to bricks and mortar? What I learned from my chain of video stores (1:05:01) Lyin' Leon Panetta STILL unashamedly pushes that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo. CIA disinfo agent (1:08:48)Man sentenced to 7 months in jail for a meme mocking Hillary Clinton (1:15:39)Soros-funded DA is carjacked by repeat offenders. Did he turn them loose afterward? (1:19:35)Proud Boys appeal — not an appeal over the draconian punishment, but an appeal by DOJ to double their absurd jail sentences (1:25:16)Look at how Biden administration is stonewalling refugees of ONE GROUP…(1:27:48)What Dorothy's Ruby Slippers Tell Us About Life's Meaning A man who thought the prop "ruby slippers" were real ruby is going to jail for the rest of his life for stealing them (1:33:27) The latest narrative on the Gaza hospital bombing…nobody died! What's true? (1:37:22)WATCH: Nun does a Hail Mary flying charge and takedown of a climate crazy trying to block their construction project (1:46:54)"Infrastructure Czar" will destroy infrastructure, ban ALL private cars, etc (1:50:27)"Melting glaciers" reveal archaeological tidbits from the past. Wait, doesn't this destroy their "man made" narrative? (1:53:26)INTERVIEW Sheriff Mack & Constitution Targeted by Leftist Hate Groups The principle of "non-commandeering" has been upheld by SCOTUS, the key decision in a case brought and won by Sheriff Mack. So why are leftist hate mongers making a concerted effort to attack Constitutional Sheriffs who stand with the Constitution even if bureaucrats demand they follow orders given under false color of law? Sheriff Richard Mack, CSPOA.org joins (2:00:26) Trump whines about his gag order that stops him from trolling court personnel, but don't you wish he was as smart & articulate as Canada's Pierre Poilievre who destroys a trolling reporter, then makes a common sense policy point. WATCH (2:56:33)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Music Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 19th of October, Year of Our Lord 2023. Well, today we will talk about what is happening with a hospital outrage across the world. It really doesn't matter what happened there. Everybody's going to believe what they want to believe. As we see different stories emerging about this,

the anger across Europe and other places tells us a great deal about what is happening that is far more important than what happened in the hospital. But we're not going to start with that. We're going to begin with lockdown fraud. And, you know, as we're starting to peel back the layers like an onion of this fraud that was perpetrated on us, it is getting more and more interesting as we peel these back. So we're going to take a look at that. We'll also take a look at what is happening with climate. Tony's

going to be joining us today, Tony Arterman. And we'll also have Sheriff Mack, because the Southern Poverty Law Center has now decided that they are public enemy number one, begging law enforcement to do something. Well, that's what Sheriff Mack's been begging law enforcement to do, to follow the Constitution. We'll be right back. Well, it's interesting to see as people are talking about the different layers of corruption, the different layers of fraud with the lockdown and the rest of this stuff. And understand that was 100% really under Trump. It was the thing that Fauci, President fauci got trump to go along with but it's interesting to see that the trump media like for example wnd uh they always talk about it in the abstract you know you'll see mainstream media say well covid did this to us and covid did that to us

the um alternative media because they don't want to focus on COVID, they kind of understand there was no real virus that was making people sick, killing people. There wasn't another 1918 flu like Trump keeps telling people. But they understand that's not the case. So what they'll say was, this is pandemic did it to us. Pandemic. No, it's the rules of the pandemic the pandemic was a pandemic of tyranny of psychological gaslighting and fear and the so-called remedies the medical martial law as i

called it and as i said you know southern poverty law center is coming after sheriff mac they they came after me they had uh uh you know because i called it medical martial law from the beginning and that's what it was uh so the headline pandemic unemployment fraud could reach mind-boggling numbers no trump unemployment fraud could reach mind-boggling numbers we're talking about the ppp i've said from the very beginning you know paraphrasing uh josie wales uh outlaw josie wales don't ppp down my back and tell me it's raining or tell me there's a bug going around a new study from the government accountability office estimated the amount of fraud from the pandemic era no the trump era the trump error error

unemployment insurance programs is likely between 100 billion and 135 billion about 11 to 15 percent of the total that they put out for this yeah covid didn't do it to us yeah the economy is suffering from long Trump, not long COVID. And of course, we have now unleashed the Biden variant of this as well to follow up with the original long COVID from Trump. The long lockdown, the patterning for Mark of the government, Mark of the Beast ID numbers, and the patterning for universal basic income, welfare, as they lock us down and take everything from us. That's what it was about.

The GAO found rampant waste, abuse, and fraud of the COVID-19 era. No, the Trump era. And this fraud and this abuse was by design. I reported in the past, you know, just recently, within the last couple of months, a guy came out and he said, you know, I called him when I saw this thing. And I said, he was somebody who had run programs like this before. I forget which administration he had been in. But he said, I called him up and I said, this is going to be rife with fraud. Do you understand? There's absolutely no check or balance in this stuff. You're just going to be handing money out willy-nilly to people.

They were not interested, he said. He kept calling people in the Trump administration, see if anybody would talk to him. No. Finally, he got somebody and they said, well, there hasn't been any fraud yet. He said, you haven't even started handing money out yet. What are you talking about? The same type of stuff that we saw with the FDA. You know, you had, uh, as soon as, uh, someone with the children's health defense, um, group saw they're going to be pegylating, uh, this MRNA stuff as bad as MRNA, you know, nanoparticles

weren't everything. They're going to pegylate it. And he called up and he said, you know, that's going to put a lot of people in anaphylactic shock and it's like the fda said well well we don't care call uh pfizer see if they care and of course pfizer didn't care either i mean they were warned they knew and it was all by design quite frankly i really don't think they're that stupid and multiple people told them before during all of of this stuff, what was going on, they did it anyway.

So it was meant to help those who are laid off due to the pandemic, says WMD. You notice I just can't get past this, you know, misdirection that they have. No, people are laid off due to the lockdown mandates of Trump and Fauci. And they were mandates. I was not whitewash this for Trump. They will not mention Trump anywhere in this article. They'll mention all of his programs, but it was the pandemic. It was COVID-19.

It was a pandemic era. All the rest of this stuff makes me sick. And this is why this grifter keeps going. Using statistical modeling, GAO used this data sample to estimate that the total amount of fraud in pandemic unemployment insurance programs was between $100 and $135 billion. About a year of Ukraine. Not only were taxpayers defrauded of billions, but the Department of Labor anticipated this. You see? They knew it was going to happen.

They even awarded, rather than doing anything or listening to people who are warning them about fraud, what they said was, well, give the states $1.5 billion to investigate the fraud that we know we're going to create. And as they investigated and brought people in, they have now recovered $1.2 billion. They haven't even recovered the cost of what was given out there in anticipation of this fraud for the investigations. Less than the cost of the investigation. Since 2018, GAO made 26 recommendations to the Department of Labor to prevent fraud and overpayments. But so far, 16 of those have not yet been fully implemented.

They implemented 10 out of 26. And that's over four years. Two years of Trump and two years of Biden. Just in case you think there's a big difference between these guys. One of them is going to save us. The hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted and stolen between various pandemic relief programs. No Trump relief programs like the paycheck protection program, PPP.

The reality is, is that PPP has always been an acronym for public private partnership and this was a public private partnership to screw everybody else in america it was a government partner is a fda partnered with pfizer moderna and you got the department of labor partnering with the states and everybody else to defraud us. Lock us down. Put us on welfare. But most of the money going on fraud.

Economic injury disaster loan program. The unemployment insurance. All this is added up to a significant part of the U.S. debt. And will cost taxpayers for years to come as we finance this at much higher interest rates. Not a surprise, actually, because Trump has always been known as the bankruptcy king that's what he's going to do this country kicked it off you know and now he set the one of the precedents that he set was they can spend you know three four five six trillion dollars a year who cares the covet bailout of state and local governments was unnecessary says reason

no actually it was that necessary for the money now they're talking about the biden money program so this is not trump this is what biden did in 2021 giving money to state and local governments who didn't need it and we know that because they didn't spend it. And that's the whole point of the Reason article. But it was necessary for Trump to give massive amounts of money in 2020 to the governments, to the governors personally, to the governors personally, as part of their emergency, to keep their emergency going. That was their bribe, just like they bribed hospitals with a 20% bonus and the awards.

If you call somebody a COVID patient, if you put them on a ventilator, if you give them this or that, plus we'll give you a 20% bonus on everything that you do once you identify them. So, you know, they would test people with a PCR test before they give them any treatment as they're having a heart attack and dying. The mercenary people. And so he did that with the governors he gave them this money in 2020 trump gave it to them as their personal discretionary money brad little a good example of it in idaho who kept this emergency going the republic

republican governor a republican legislature and like he was some kind of British colonial governor, he suspended the legislature when they called them, you know, this was all done in a year where most of the Republican states would meet every other year, you know, Texas, Idaho, they'd meet every other year. So they did this in an off year. So these people would have to call a special session. And so he shut down their call to call a special session and so he shut down their call to do a special session and then produced some legislation to keep this stuff going and to push the vaccine

and to punish people who didn't go through the mask and lockdown stuff and it was all because he had been given an amount of money that i forget the exact multiple, it was three or four times. The entire state budget was given to governor Brad Lill in Idaho by Trump in order to push the emergency. And it was his own personal discretionary funds. He could use this to buy political favors with anybody and everybody. And they all did. Uh, so two years after Congress authorized this hugely expensive bailout of state and local governments.

A lot of the money has not even been spent. And so, as reason says, maybe it wasn't needed in the first place. States have only spent 45% of the funding that they got. Local jurisdictions have only spent 38% of the money they got. This is the a $2 trillion. Again, the Trump precedent, a $2 trillion. It was done in March of 2021. Uh, they didn't spend it because they don't need it, but it was necessary. Very necessary in 2020 to get the governors to go along with it.

Now here's coming out of the UK. They're doing a much better job of exposing these frauds than we are in the United States. Of course, we had the exposure of Matt Hancock, who was there, uh, their guy who was running all the lockdown stuff and everything.

Remember that, uh, the guy who had to resign in shame after he was caught, uh, meeting, um, uh, a married woman having an affair with her.

I don't even like that word, adultery, with her violation of all of his rules. And then they subsequently got his text messages and he's passing text messages back and forth to people laughing about those people they'd put into quarantine, what they were doing to them. Saying, man, what should we do next? You clearly can see from just that one guy who is their lockdown czar, the sheer hypocrisy, the cynical mocking of people who they had scared literally to death and those who were not afraid or being ruthlessly punished for violating these draconian rules and so now they're looking at the guy they call professor lockdown his name is neil ferguson he was the architect of the lockdown as a matter of fact

he was the architect of he was uh used by fauci and trump to lock us down it, he was the architect of, he was used by Fauci and Trump to lock us down. It was, he was the guy who did the model at the Imperial College of London. Oh, that sounds so impressive, doesn't it? Saying everybody's going to die. As a matter of fact, Trump is still selling that lie. In every interview where they challenge him on the vaccines. Look, this is a great, you know, it was going to be millions of people who died if I didn't get the vaccine out there and so you know i saved everybody around the world no no all of that is based on professor lockdown's failed climate model sounds like some kind of a

children's fable doesn't it yeah it was kind of a children's fable. Yeah. Some expect Roald Dahl to do, you know. Anyway, they're now on to him. Professor Ferguson's terrifying March 2020 models warned that 500,000 Brits would die. Of course, it was many millions of Americans. Unless tougher action was taken to curb the virus's spread. And as I've said many times, I'd say it very quickly, in his model, there was no curve. All this stuff about flattening the curve, right? That is the model that goes back to the early 1800s.

Far as law, it gave us that bell-shaped curve. And they said, you know, whatever they saw, whenever there was an epidemic that went through in any area, you know, whether it's cholera or typhus or smallpox, it always followed that bell-shaped curve. And so we had to flatten the curve. Well, in his model, there was no curve. It was a straight line going up forever. Every person infected would infect another 2.2 people or whatever the imaginary number was forever nothing was ever going to change it and then it got even worse the university of edinburgh got a hold of his model and they started playing with it and they said uh every time we run this even if we have the same inputs we get different answers this is is just garbage. 15,000 lines of Fortran code.

Total garbage. It's a random number generator. So just pick the number that you want and ship it to Boris Johnson and to Trump. They're stupid enough to follow through. It spooked Boris Johnson into adopting draconian restrictions and also trump but this is done this is uh from the daily skeptic and it's done from the perspective of uh uk and again they've got this guy and they're interrogating him now neil ferguson it's about time uh so everybody was told they must stay home vaccines are the only safe route out of the pandemic.

And they're still months away from being deployed. And again, this is how we knew from the very beginning. Because this is part of the modeling, part of the simulation, part of the germ games that the CIA and the NIH have been doing for 20 years. Going back to the first one, two months before 9-11. So Professor Ferguson quit his role as a SAGE advisor two months after being caught breaking the social distancing rules to meet his married lover, just like Matt Hancock. Both of these guys, lying adulterers. This is why I say when you look at trump and his multiple marriages and how he treated his wives it is uh something of a character issue isn't it if somebody will break

their oath to their wife if they'll lie uh they are you can't trust them that we used to understand that as a country it used to be important all these philandering presidents would have to keep their mistresses secret. They have no shame anymore. And the conservatives and the evangelicals just love Trump in spite of all that. He's a man of no character, just like Matt Hancock and just like lockdown Professor Ferguson. So anyway, this is part of an inquiry. Now, there's going to be information that comes out of this stuff. But understand that these inquiries, these commissions to investigate, are really there as part of a cover-up.

The 9-11 Commission was there as a cover-up. The JFK Assassination Commission was there as a cover-up the jfk assassination commission was there as a cover-up the climate gate commission that their inquiry that they had in the uk was there to cover it all up and to explain it away and that will be the outcome the final outcome of all this stuff but um as we start to get these nuggets of truth uh we have to understand none of these people matt hancock and Ferguson, neither of them believed that any of this stuff was real. Neither of them believed that any of this stuff was true that they were telling people. Neither of them believed that any of this stuff was necessary. Imperial College London Professor Ferguson, Professor Lockdown, said, I know I'm

associated very much with this particular policy, but as you'll be aware from the evidence I've given in my statement, the reality is a lot more complex. This is like Paul interviewing Dick Levine, who calls himself Rachel, who was a child psychologist. Well, Senator, the truth is very complex. And what is truth anyway? That's the only response you get from these people. I don't think I stepped over that line to say we need to do this now. What I tried to do was at times just step outside the scientific advisory role to try to focus people's minds on what was going to happen

and on the consequences of current trends. Scaring people to death, in other words. Their work suggested that 500,000 Brits would die if nothing was done to stop the spread of the virus, and there would be 250,000 deaths if two-thirds of the people caught COVID. Except that nobody died. Except from neglect. Except from non-treatment except from the death protocols pushed in the hospitals of ventilators and remdesivir that is a reality the reality of what happened now this is interesting in New Zealand we had Jabs into Arden this is a very important story this comes

from the people's voice.tv uh and i think it is out of um well i'm not sure where it is the people's voice.tv so spread this around the new zealand government exempted elites from the deadly covid jabs now we all figured this out, right? They're getting placebos, right? Well, actually, we've got the proof. They did what is called in America a FOIA. They call it an OIA. O-I-A.

Same thing. And they got the documents from these people to show how they were granting vaccine exemptions to the elite. New Zealand's ministry of health granted vaccine exemptions to key staff while hypocritically rolling out the world's most draconian vaccine mandates and assisting that the public be vaccinated. The hypocritical vaccine exemptions from the elite, says the People's Voice, were granted by former Prime Minister Jabsinda Ardern's government before she stood down and accepted a new role at the World Economic Forum's global, quote, disinformations czar.

That's her position now. She's going to attack free speech. Arden's decision to allow the elite to refuse a vaccine while forcing the vax on normal people was revealed by an official information act, OIA request, dated 2nd of August, 2023. And it asked the question, according to the legislation at the time in 2021, there were operational exemptions available for those who are not getting vaccinated against COVID-19. Your website outlines a process for applying for an operated exemption under Clause 12a. How many requests were received and how many were approved by the Ministry of Health? What an Orwellian title that is. Oh yeah. The ministry of love, you know, where they have the police state inquiry,

the ministry of truth, where they send you the propaganda. And this is New Zealand's ministry of health. Well, they replied and they said from the 13th of November, 2021 to 26, September, 2022. And that, again, after they approved, give the emergency authorization for these untested vaccines. A total of 478 applications for significant service disruption exemption were received. 103 applications were granted,

covering approximately 11,005 workers. Please note, it's not possible to provide the exact number of workers covered by this. Because it was possible for an organization to submit an application that would cover more than one worker. So they granted 103 applications. They granted about one-fifth of the applications that people asked for. It was just under 500. and they granted 100 of them. But that was 11,000 people, approximately. Now, let's talk about how many people there are in New Zealand and how many government workers.

I looked this up. Of course, the population of New Zealand is just over 5 million people. And they have 57,149 government workers and so these are public employees that were granted this exemption um and for the most part because you know a lot of them are doctors of course they're public employees they're government health here so they're saying that about 20% of them were exempted of the government workers. Now, the other people who, you can bet that the people out there

actually doing the work did not get exempted. It's the people at the top. Guy Hatchert reports and says, I've made inquiries and found some staff prepared to leak information. One source has told me that 95 consultants in the Dunedin region alone benefited from vaccine exemptions. Another source has pointed to a group of doctors working in Northland who arranged among themselves to remain unvaccinated. That total appears to be hundreds and possibly more. It seems that those granted exemptions were restrained by gag orders.

Gag orders. Right? I'm not going to, just between us, you don't have to get this thing. But you're going to help us to push this, right? But you better not tell anybody about this. Yeah, not the mask orders. These are gag orders. Everybody upset about Trump's gag orders?

This ought to go global, this story. Let's talk about the gag orders, about the people who were given exemptions and didn't have to get the vaccines, even though they were crafting the policy and administering the vaccines to other people. they didn't have to get it themselves. That's the kind of gag order we ought to be, but everybody's going to, you mean Trump can't throw personal insults to the people who are opposing him in court?

Oh, the first amendment is over now. Yeah. Died under him. Actually, uh, they could tell, they cannot tell anyone that they've been granted exemptions. It was a secretive process that the Ministry of Health was anxious to hide from the public. The Orwellian Ministry of Health. In any case, any doctor advising a patient that the mRNA vaccine might be risky faced disciplinary action. And many of them were actually suspended.

So medical staff allowed themselves to be manipulated into a position whereby if they were unvaccinated themselves, they were still required to advise their patients to vaccinate. Widespread hypocrisy. Cynical, criminal hypocrisy. Whatever happened to medical ethics? Whatever happened to first do no harm? Gone, folks. Understand the corporate hospital system,

or the government hospital system, as you see in New Zealand and most other countries, is hopelessly corrupt. This process was certainly approved by Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, who himself gained considerable notoriety by refusing vaccine exemptions to those among the public who had already been severely injured by the first shot. He said, okay, I don't care that you were severely injured by the first shot. You survived, Get another one.

And he got an exemption. Or he approved these. So insisting that they continue along with the vaccination schedule. Given Dr. Bloomfield's close work with Jabsinda Arden and Chris Hipkins, it is quite likely that they were both aware of the process and approved it. The opposition leaders were also kept in the loop. So when you look at this video here of Jab Sinda, and she's never looked better with her horse face covered with a mask.

It ought to be required for her, at least. But you look at her getting this jab they put out there for everybody. Do you believe that that's real? Do you believe that's a placebo? I do. I believe that all of these people like Trump and Biden and Jabson, Arden, I believe they were all posturing with all this stuff while they cynically poisoned their own people.

That's the reality. The criteria for granting exemptions apparently entailed an assessment concerning how vital staff were to the working of the health department. Oh, okay. So, wouldn't you say, because this is the argument that they use for us, well, hospital people, you need to get it first. Because, you say, because this is the argument that they use for us, well, hospital people, you need to get it first. Because, you know, if you don't get it, you're going to spread it.

If you don't get the shot, you're going to spread this deadly virus. So the argument has been that it's necessary for the health people to get it. But instead, they looked at this and they said, well, wait a minute. How vital are our staff? If it's somebody that we think is really important, not necessarily that they're necessary, but they've got good connections. If they're vital staff, this is an admission that they believe that this is very risky, right?

If it was necessary, safe, and effective, you would give it to your vital staff first. They say, wait, we'll give them an exemption if we really need them. What's that tell you? Well, it tells you that they deliberately poisoned people. Used people as lab rats, just as netanyahu can brag about that because world economic forum masters about how they're using their people for lab rats for pfizer and of course these people did the same thing how many ways do we need to cut this you see these people using their people as

an experiment you see other people saying, those of us who are important, we're not going to take it. We'll give it to the hoi polloi out there. Senior officials and those holding key surgical positions could actually insist that they remain unvaccinated and continue to be allowed to work. While there were brutal recriminations against anybody who warned the public, brutal recriminations against anybody else who didn't get it. So why did senior medical staff choose to remain unvaccinated? Ask this article.

Well, we all know. Because they're liars, they're hypocrites, and they're murderers for hire. They may have been made aware, says this article, of a 2019 paper that was in the Frontiers of Oncology Journal, Cancer Journal, that was titled, Gene Therapy Leaves a Vicious Cycle. You know, we're seeing that this stuff has all these different effects and how it doesn't stop. And this is what they said in the Journal of Oncology.

Gene therapy leads a vicious cycle. They said, gene therapy has been caught in a vicious cycle for nearly two decades. Owing to immune response, insertional mutagenesis, viral tropism, off-target activity, unwanted clinical outcomes ranging from illness to death of participants, and from patchy regulations for two decades. We haven't approved any of this stuff because it kills people. It mutates people. It causes cancer. It accelerates cancer and on and on and on. They knew it.

They knew it. And now what is it? Now that's the new race. We've got to have mRNA for everything. Got to put mRNA in your food, even. Inject it into the animals. Make food. Reproduce all of this stuff.

Look, this is one of the reasons why Moderna had been around for over a decade. And they'd never had a market that came to to uh never had a product that got to market they existed off of all these fairy tale stories that they would tell people on Wall Street hopium they were selling hopium on Wall Street and everybody's oh look we got this new drug and it's done these great trial and it does this and does that wow that sounds amazing that's going to be amazing you can use this new drug and it's done these great trials and it does this and does that. Wow, that sounds amazing. That's going to be amazing. You can use this mRNA stuff and it's going to cure this and cure that.

And yet when they would go to the trials, everybody said, well, you know, it's killing participants. We have all these unwanted clinical outcomes. So they never got anything approved until Trump and Operation Warp Speed. Same story as remdesivir. You know, for years they said it destroys, I think it's your liver, it destroys your body, it destroys your organs, and it doesn't do anything. He tried to sell it for AIDS, he tried to sell it for Ebola, but then again, you know, with Trump and Fauci,

they got it approved for the imaginary virus. So, yeah, for two decades, nobody did it. Incredibly against the evidence, the government in New Zealand, the government in the United States, still encouraging the public to get vaccinated. That's right. 2% of the people will do it too in the United States. And then there's this.

The 2023 excess death data across different countries. Now, this is very incriminating. This is an excellent article. The People's, let me get it again so I can tell it to you. Thepeoplesvoice.tv. Okay, so what they did was they looked at the most highly vaccinated nations and the least vaccinated nations and they looked at the excess death rate and so the most highly vaccinated nations portugal chile canada iceland new zealand spain australia

the average percentage of the population vaccinated with those nations, 91%. Their excess deaths so far this year, this year, 2023. 12% above the five-year historical average. 12% of the people killed by that. 91% of the people vaccinated. 12% more than the usual number of deaths. In the least COVID vaccinated nations, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Poland, Estonia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Switzerland, the average percentage of the population vaccinated is only 63%.

Their rate of excess deaths so far in 2023 is zero, zero percent. And they point out in this that the insurance companies, the actuaries, insurance companies make a lot of money. They make a lot of money by predicting across the board how many people are going to die. They've got it down to an exact science and this is why it was such groundbreaking news when at the beginning of 2022 we were told that that big insurance company out of indiana one america i think if i remember the name correctly they said we have seen something you wouldn't expect in hundreds of years this is more than three standard deviations away from the mean the number of people who died

and it began in the third quarter of 2021 not during the so-called pandemic began when they rolled out the vaccines and then it continued on in the fourth quarter and so forth when everybody was getting vaccinated and then he spends a ceo lies to you he says well we were told these were not covid deaths and uh and yet i know they were you know they were you know better than the people who got the data and he says and further, I also know that nobody's going to die if they get the vaccine. So these people, I say, died of COVID. And I say it was only the unvaccinated. So we're going to go up on the insurance rates of the unvaccinated.

This is what I say. This is a public-private partnership to kill us all. And so 0% and those least vaccinated, they get 63% of the people vaccinated, only 0% excess deaths. And the places where they got 91% of the population vaccinated, 12% excess death, 12% over the usual. Yeah. What does that tell us?

It tells us that the father of the jab, Trump, who calls himself the father of the vaccine, is a mass murderer. And he's our most popular politician. It's just like going to China and seeing all of these posters of Mao. We'll never get over it. It'll never change.

Trump will always be a hero. When he dies, he will have been assassinated by the deep state and the globalists, except he was for them. Mao killed probably 100 million of his own people unnecessarily, deliberately, for power. You could try to make an excuse and say, well, he just didn't know this, you know, what he was doing with the Great Leap Forward and sending everybody out in the fields who didn't know anything about growing stuff. And no, it was deliberate. And they still worship him. And Trump will still be worshiped with all this stuff. And the Pfizer trial,

the unvaccinated control group were all vaccinated after just a couple of months to make sure that nobody saw any long-term effects. But even though they vaccinated them before they vaccinate people, they saw a huge difference in people who had very severe outcomes or death because of that. This is why they're exposed to fraud. And perhaps we will start to spell fraud with a P in front of it, like we spell Pfizer with a P in front of it. So according to the OECD, there were 1.2 million excess deaths in 2022. To give you a starter figure about what Trump killed, because that's not even counting the hospital death protocols of 2020.

And so the take on this is the one thing that I'm concerned about with this article. I say, now it's becoming accepted that both COVID and COVID vaccinations began their lives in a biotech lab. It doesn't seem to matter much what proportion of excess deaths are due to COVID and what are due to COVID vaccination. Well, I disagree with that. We must not buy this gain of function lie about that is a tactic that is being used by all the mainstream media. It's being used by these politicians, these cynical murdering politicians, being used by them as an excuse for the vaccine industry and to target China. The Wu flu, the China flu, the this, that, right?

It's to help to generate anger about China. No, we were shot and killed by our own government. And I began the show today with this because I want you to understand as they push us further and further into war, they want us to take a side. You understand? These people kill their own people. Netanyahu killed his own people. Guy who's pushing this war.

You trust him with any of this stuff? You trust any of these narratives coming out, even about this hospital thing? I don't. Don't trust these people. Don't follow them. Don't fall into their pattern of fear they had us had people killing themselves three years ago two years ago and now they want you to do it again this 4d chess stuff and it's the alternative media that's pushing it as well oh they're pushing this

this lab stuff really hard. Really hard. Which is a way to excuse these people. Well, you know, this lab thing, it was so dangerous. We had to do something. Yeah, we made some mistakes because we rushed it, but we had to rush it because the lab stuff from China was so dangerous. No, no, that was a lie. You killed people with your hospital death protocols

for something that wasn't dangerous. Tell people to go home. Come back when you're really sick and then we'll put you on a ventilator and we'll give you remdesivir. Not going to give you any treatment. We're going to withhold that. We're going to take people's licenses if they give you hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin or any of this stuff. So, again, what are their motivations of these ministries of health and these politicians who do this to us well don't worry we just need to fight over trump and over biden uh because you know they both killed us but one of them, Trump, is going to save us.

Thank you on Rockton. Brandon Bennett, thank you very much for the tip on Rumble. Braves Girl, thank you also. Have you thought about asking author William Forschen, who wrote the One Second After series, to come on your show? I'll look that up. I'm not familiar with either one of those, but thank you for the tip. On Rumble, I'm wondering,

the one second after, was that an EMP thing or something? I'm not sure. Rumble, B Slice, thank you very much for the tip. Hi, David. Was just in South Dakota for a fishing trip. Drove by a house with a huge sign saying, only God and Trump can save us.

The brainwashing is real. Yeah, it is. Yeah, I'm surprised that they don't put Trump first. You know, God is Trump's co-pilot, right? No, Jesus is my savior, not the guy who jabbed us, right? Jab us. Jab us is going to save us all.

Rockfin, defund the politics i agree with that thank you very much for the tip uh david travis love the show keep speaking truthful thank you very much uh so uh we and i just got a message that tony can't do the interview today where there's something happening with construction very loud outside where he's got a studio set up but we still will have planning on having uh sheriff mac join us we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back uh You're listening to the david knight show well let's talk about some things you already know walmart is spying on ozempic patients shopping habits and finds that they're buying less food so let's think about this you know they don't think that we know, but we do know, don't we? That processed food is designed to be addictive. That Ozempic is designed to suppress appetite. What a surprise for the Walmart people.

But as part of this, we learned that, of course, Walmart is spying on you. But we knew that as well, too, didn't we? They think you don't know, but you do. As Bloomberg reports, a Walmart executive admitted that the company has been looking at anonymized customer data. Yeah, right. Finding that shoppers taking the diabetes drug and its weight loss management counterpart, Wegovy, are buying less food. We do see a slight pullback in overall basket, is the way he puts it, an overall basket.

So semaglutide works by mimicking the natural intestinal hormone, which alerts the brain to stomach fullness and essentially sends signals to stop you from being hungry. So what a surprise that they would find this out, right? The problem is it also has some adverse effects which we also all know uh you can lose interest in food you can have intestinal blockage or the worst case scenario you can have stomach paralysis what is that well it's the stomach muscles gradually starting to atrophy. And you're just kind of locking up and they're no longer moving anything.

And it causes unbelievable pain and cramping and many other more serious things. It makes people who have taken it and talked about their side effects. One woman said, I wish I had never seen this stuff. It made my life absolute hell. And it has cost me so much money to get treatment for this. Another woman who was a teacher said I had to quit my job because I just kept vomiting all the time. So, you know, there's that. I'm talking about pharmaceutical drugs here.

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that investors behind Campbell's Soup and the makers of Slim Jim Meat Sticks are already asking tough questions about the companies that they own a stake in. Stakeholders are asking this. How are you going to deal with these drugs that kill people's appetites. Bloomberg reported that the CEO of a Kellogg subsidiary that makes Cheez-Its and Pringles is, quote, by no means complacent as the drug's potential to cut into this company's profit margins grows. So, new data suggests that a whopping 1.7% of Americans have already been prescribed semaglutide drugs. That's about the number of people. It's almost the number of people still taking these boosters. I guess you can't always find people who are going to take this stuff.

And look, for some some people it's worked um and you know you can have uh very serious issues with diabetes and weight issues like that i understand that i'm just saying you better understand the downsides of this uh and we'll talk about that a little bit more but first of all from the business standpoint the walmart ceo said that because the retailer sells ozempic and wegabe through its pharmacies that actually has seen a boost in revenue even as they're losing money on the drugs and as the expensive drug continues to be massively prescribed so understand they make more money on junk drugs than they do on junk food at Walmart. Because when we look at one of the side effects that people are not talking about too much is links to suicide from this drug.

And I look at this and it's like, why do so many, I see this so often, why do so many non-psychoactive drugs, why do so many, I see this so often, why do so many non-psychoactive drugs, why do so many of them? And, you know, you look at SSRI and it's like, well, that's supposed to affect people's moods and things like this. It's given by, prescribed by psychiatrists and stuff for that purpose. So you could expect that, well, maybe it's going to give people suicidal ideation, which it does and drives many people to suicide and a very dangerous drug. But you look at it, this is a diet drug, an appetite suppressor. Why is this causing people to commit suicide or suicidal ideation? It's amazing to me how many of these pharmaceutical products make people want to

kill themselves. And I'm not talking about people wanting to kill themselves because of the health issues that these pharmaceutical drugs do to people. Uh, the FDA has received hundreds of reports of suicidal thoughts and depression from patients on weight loss medications since 2010, as well as 36 deaths by suicide or suspected suicide. A significant number occurred shortly after starting the drugs or upping those dosage, only to subside when the patients stopped taking them. And so they're saying, well, this is a very small number of people that are out there. But look, where there's smoke, there's fire.

We've heard this type of story over and over again. It's rare. You know, we got blood clots here, but it's rare, right? No. I wanted to tell people about this because it may not be so rare. Dr. Eric Turner, who used to work for the FDA, said that many patients stopped suffering suicidal thoughts when they came off of the drug, making it hard to explain away the

suicidality. That's actually the word they used. So it's drugs like Wegovy, Ozempic, Monjaro, made by Eli Lilly, if I'm pronouncing these made up names correctly, uh, and, uh, so some people are saying, well, we want to have a warning for suicide, the black label. That, uh, Kim Watsit that I talked to remember her name correctly. I think it's Watsit or something. Um, she fought for years to get that done. Finally got it done for SSRIs. Clearly an issue with that thousands of documented cases now with that, but that's, uh, it took a while for them to get that done finally got it done for ssris clearly an issue with that thousands of

documented cases now with that but that's it took a while for them to get that out there but they're still selling it and but it does have a black label on it and so kim went to uh she is on a consumer representative on their fba fda FDA panels and everything, and she's pushing very hard against this stuff, but they keep approving these things. With these drugs, you go weekly and you get an injection. So one 53-year-old mother of four from Ohio, Ms. Heidelbaugh, revealed that she started taking the drug every Sunday

and that by Tuesday, she said she would feel lethargic, depressed, and at times suicidal, believing her family would be better without her. The symptoms would persist for a few days, she said, and then return shortly after her next injection. They only didn't appear when she skipped a dose. She had no history of depression, anything else like that. She said, I knew it was the drug. Another patient, Sarah Sobel, 40 years old from Buffalo, New York,

revealed how it had left her with panic attacks, hallucinations, suicidal thoughts. Same stuff that the SSRI things did to people. She began to take it in 2021 for weight loss, but stopped after these side effects appear. She said, if somebody had said, this is a side effect, you're not losing your mind. It really would have helped me.

I thought I would end up in a psych ward. I was terrified. I would not be normal again, ever. A third patient, Lisa Wood, 22, who lost 70 pounds from the drug, said she also had suicidal thoughts while on it.

I was driving and I thought, what if I just jerked the wheel on this bridge? It didn't occur to me that it was Wagamay. It reminds me, it's that, it's Hen and Her Sisters, I think it was. And it was a Woody Allen film. And it had Christopher Walken in it when he was pretty young. And Woody Allen is in the seat next to him, and Christopher Walken character is driving. And he's saying, you know,

have you ever thought about what it would be like just to jerk the wheel and hit this car? And he's like, what? Get me out of here anyway um sorry that's off off the side anyway fourth patient only gave her first name said she also had suicidal thoughts while on wegavy she repeatedly visualized shooting herself she's a nurse she said one evening the symptoms became so bad she went to the ER and they gave her anxiety medications and the doctor told her, you're a mom. This happens when you get overtired.

Well, there you go. So you should have aborted these kids. That's the problem. It's not the pharmaceutical drugs. Several users also raised concerns on social media saying that they were feeling hollow and as though they rarely anything makes me happy they said so we've seen this they said before in 2008 sanofi's accomplia weight loss drug was withdrawn in europe after being linked to suicidal thoughts it was never approved in the u.s the weight loss drug contra v carries a black box warning, SSRIs, about suicidal thinking.

And another obesity medicine, you might wind up, uh, being obese and, and go down this path of taking a drug and, uh, suicidal, but it may also be a kind of a form of suicide as we can't control our addiction to these things.

You know, they're highly addictive and they've made, they've designed the food, the junk food to be highly addictive. I remember my grandfather before junk food even got popular he died before I was five years old but and I don't remember him saying this but my mom told me she said he said most people a lot of people will dig their grave with a knife and a fork. And we should think about what we eat.

Definitely should. Anyway, some other things that you probably also knew, but other people have now just shown. Six months ago, NPR left Twitter. They were angry with Elon Musk and his label of it being, you know, essentially a propaganda organization, which it is. And so they said the effects have been negligible they said twitter was not worth the effort it certainly isn't worth the effort for me and of course now elon musk is talking about charging people by the tweet you know if you don't pay subscription for a monthly thing, he's going to start it and do a test case, he said, in some small countries.

But if you don't pay it on a monthly basis, then he'll charge you per tweet, like a buck per tweet or something. Who's going to use that? They essentially got what they wanted. They arranged an advertiser boycott. He's losing a lot of money, so he looks at other ways to make the money back and put it on user fees. I don't think it's a viable model, but it certainly, regardless of all that, it's not been a viable model for me for five years. I've been censored. I've been shadow

banned. It is absolutely useless for me to do any work on social media. And as I, I will post up videos that we do but I'm not really interested in interacting with people or pushing any news out on social media I just think it's a waste of time definitely a waste of time for me and even NPR said it was a waste of time for them six months later they said we can see the effects of leaving Twitter have been negligible. A memo circulated to NPR staff says traffic has dropped by only 1% as a result of leaving Twitter now officially. And let me just say this. Since I don't do anything on social media, it's worthless for me to try to do it, if

I'm even allowed on the platform. If you could like even on the platforms where you watch it, if you could like the broadcast, if it's on a video platform, if it's on a audio podcast platform, if you could like it, if you could share it, if your friends see that type of thing, that would help us a great deal. That would be far more effective than anything I could do. And if you don't like it that much to share it, then maybe we shouldn't be doing it anyway. Netflix is going to open up brick and mortar locations. I got to say, I didn't see this coming.

This is really bizarre. Before I get into that, though, let me respond to some of the people who have left comments and tips as well. Thank you. On Rockfin, MJ Nicholsols thank you for the tip uh reading one second after right now halfway through it appears to be a good book it's the first in a series of three or four i believe uh again i don't know what that is is that is that a emp or something like that um on rock fan michael pomroy Thank you for the tip. He said, good morning, David. Everyone needs to revisit our three yesterday on 18th of October.

The interview with George Barna was not just your usual great, but spectacular. Well, thank you. I thought it was very interesting. This is a guy who has a wealth of information. He is the most quoted person in terms of giving people a pulse as to what is happening with Christians and the church and people's beliefs and worldviews in general in the society. He founded the Barna Group. He's now with Arizona Christian University or something, and he's got another organization that he set up. But he's been watching this stuff for decades. And he summarized the findings that he had in this latest book.

So I'd highly recommend his book as well. But yeah, do check out that interview. He is a fascinating person. And he's got a lot of experience and a lot of wisdom about this stuff. On Rockfan Duggalog, thank you very much for the tip. He says the term Zion has forever referred to the city of David, adjacent to the Temple Mount, also known as the city of God. A Zionist would be someone who believes God,

but the term has been bastardized by the enemies of God, and it's just another way Satan is tearing down the name of God and Christianity and the people of God. Thank you, David. Yeah, and when I, okay, travis but now one second after is an emp novel okay um but getting back to uh dougalug's comment that's why i'm not going to get into this i'm not going to get into the end times theology or the rest of this stuff uh i would just point out to people that you know it's it's not just the palestinians but in our country in our country you know we don't have a significant uh palestinian

presence yet these people want to change this but we see what has happened in different countries where there has been a significant palestinian presence we see what happened in lebanon for example destroyed that formerly prosperous mostly christian nation uh and um and it's why that the other arab nations don't want them in i mean this is not uh this is not racism it's just a characteristic of their culture their religion whatever you want to look at it as but understand that in our country, the same attitude of calling Americans colonizers is rooted in everything these Marxists and colleges and other places are doing. That's why they've got this knee-jerk reaction to anything that happens in the Middle East.

That's the other side of this. And so I have said that regardless you know i i come at it from a biblical worldview people have different eschatologies as to what they think is happening with this but um i don't uh you know i i've said to people i said you know when you look at um what you believe about israel or what you believe about the end of the world, it's a big mistake to try to make that happen. God will make that happen. And so we have Christians who believe that they're in the pre-tribulation rapture.

So they would love to see a situation where they don't have to go through some great tribulation and they don't have to die. They'd love to get just raptured out of here you know and um so they would those people many of them will kind of take the attitude i've talked to many of them myself i said you see what it's oh yeah just the end of the world it's great we're rapture's coming soon it's's like, no, you have to oppose this. You're here now, and you have to oppose tyranny and justice to your fellow man and all the rest of this stuff. God has not told us exactly when or how he's going to do any of this stuff.

But he has told us what he wants you to do. He wants you to defend the widow, help the orphans. He wants you to fight injustice, to stop the exploitation of your fellow man, and to follow Christ in many other ways. And not just those social things. There's many other things that you need to do. Be a witness for Christ, no matter what the social consequences are. And so that's your revealed will of God. You know, based on your eschatology, whatever you believe is going to happen,

you don't know the timing of that. And you don't know exactly how this is going to be accomplished. And I use the example of Abraham, who God told him, you're going to be the father of many nations, and all this kind of stuff. He's old, Sarah's old. And so he decides he's going to take it into his own hands because nothing's happening. I'm getting older. You know, I believe God's going to do this.

Oh, yeah, God's going to do this. But maybe he needs my help. God doesn't need your help. And just look at the story of Ishmael and Hagar and how Abraham took it into his own hands. And so we don't do that. I know what I'm supposed to do, regardless of whether or not the world ends tomorrow or not. And I know what I'm supposed to do, whatever God is going to do with Israel. And that doesn't give anybody a free pass to murder people or to harm people. It doesn't give a free pass to any government, regardless of what your theology is.

You've got some clear directions about this. And that's why we put the principles of a just war. That's why we oppose terrorism, whether it's done by individuals or by a state, because God doesn't need our help. He needs our obedience and all of this stuff. So let's talk a little bit. We'll take a break and then we'll come back and we'll talk about what is happening in some of this other news that some things that you already know, I guess we could put it that way we'll be right back Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show uh on rock fan real mccoy thank you for the tip he says uh wow fantastic coverage of the You're listening to The David Knight Show. in the future. It was a great article, but he says, I can't wait to share the clip of your show about this deadly fraud. Well, thank you very much. We'll make that a clip today. We'll put that out on the video channels as a clip.

Again, I was interested when I saw this Netflix thing about opening brick and mortar locations, and this is something that is kind of a personal interest looking at this, which I thought was kind of, we used to have video stores we got started in it and uh the mid 1980s after there was a supreme court case the movie studios didn't want their videos rented and if you remember uh in the early days you know when you would go to beta barn before it became vhs village, that you would have to pay a large amount for a membership fee.

And they were doing that kind of stuff to try to get around these restrictions. Um, you know, it was a profit center and they charge a lot to rent these things. The tapes are very expensive. Uh, and, um, but you know, they were doing this membership thing in the same way that people have to do the membership thing in order to get raw milk and stuff like that, you know, they were doing this membership thing in the same way that people have to do the membership thing in order to get raw milk and stuff like that, you know. And so, anyway, there was a Supreme Court case, and it was a doctrine of first sale. And what they said was, well, once you sell this to somebody, you don't have any authority about what they're going to do with it. And so they can rent it if they want to. And that opened up the gates because what happened was their response then was

to raise the price even higher. And then also released their catalog. And, uh, that's when we got interested in it. And, um, and I was going to do a point of sale thing. That's how we originally got into it. And, um, so I wrote a point of sale thing that worked on the macintosh which was still early uh and it also just come out with their first hard drive which had five megabytes of storage but i figured a way to cram all that stuff in there and um and it wasn't long before

those uh hard drive rates started going up you know uh within a year it was up to 10 megabytes whoo and uh but i could keep um i i had to write my own database in here anyway the the bottom line was that uh the brick and mortar stores went away largely to what netflix was doing now the studios always opposed it the studios even though they made money hand over fist and even though they were able to come up with new animated films on a regular basis and you know they they never had a failure on that model it could fail in the um in the video in the theatrical release but it make a lot of money on video good example of that was the terminator series terminator was a complete failure james cameron's first terminator it got discovered on video and became

a huge franchise uh but um you know because if we saw something was good we'd tell people about it you know and uh and that carried a lot of weight um but um anyway so they decided that they were going to stop they wanted to have a model where they participate in every transaction and so they came up with pay per view where you pay for each view that's what they wanted to have and so they came up with pay per view where you pay for each view that's what they wanted to have and so they came up with a a model where they rented the stuff to the stores and that was what blockbuster and hollywood video went with as a small video place we didn't do that instead what we went was really deep in catalog and because i was interested in

the old movies anyway and um so um you know we were okay with that but you know netflix uh we always knew that they were planning to do this video on demand is what they called it then now they call it streaming had a lot of customers who worked for um uh, uh, they worked for, uh, um, I can't remember the name of the company. I was, uh, it was a, uh, Canadian telecom company. And, and they said, you know, we've got pictures of your store and other stores. And I said, we're going to replace them. And they were doing these, um, video on demand experiments where they would, uh, go to a community and they would set up direct lines to different houses and they would have somebody sitting in this little shack and as people that

have a list of videos that they could watch and they had them all on cassette and somebody ordered this thing they would put it in the vcr and pipe it to them just to see just to monitor what people's spending habits were going to be they liked that a lot and so we knew that it was just a matter of time until bandwidth got there and uh and you know the the brick and mortar thing was going to disappear and um uh you know it's one of the reasons why when we sold the place i'd you know i took all the money and put it into the people who were going to be making the tools for the internet, the switching circuits and the electronics and stuff like that. Kind of like instead of investing in a particular company, you invest in the tools. Like the people, the gold rush they invested in, the people who made a lot of money were the people who sold the picks and the axes

more so than the prospectors who went out there. So I thought that was going to be a safe thing. And, you know, it's just a lesson that, and then we had the dot-com bust, which took down the tech companies as well. And so your timing has to be right. It's not enough just to see trends. I can tell you from personal experience with all this stuff.

But anyway, everybody's saying, what are they going to do? Are they going to sell DVDs? I thought, well, that's kind of interesting because I really do prefer. I still prefer the quality and the supplemental content of physical media like that. But I don't know that most people are looking at this and say that nobody knows what they're going to do with these stores. They're going to do two of them experimentally. They think maybe it's going to be some kind of a merchandising type of thing

like Disney has done in their Disney stores. But I don't really know since they don't have a lot of well-known characters how they're going to make that operate. So, again, it is kind of interesting because even though the studios were going to try to shut everything down with video on demand, it was really Netflix that got there first by shipping out the DVDs by mail even before they got to the streaming stuff.

But anyway, I just thought that was an interesting story. This is something you also knew a long time ago, the fact that the CIA was lying to you, the fact that you got Leon Panetta lying to people. He said, no regrets, former CIA director Leon Panetta, in an interview with Fox's Brett Baer. Interesting. It was up on Drudge yesterday. Brett Baer is selling his house in Washington, D.C. for a record amount of money.

$32 million. I wonder where they're paying this guy at Fox News. I'm in the wrong network here. Oh, wait, I'm not in a network. I guess that's fine. Panetta humiliated himself as he defended the letter that he and 50 other so-called intelligence officials signed, suggesting that Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Yeah, Brett Baer, the guy who was the raise your hand debate monitor, you know, that's what he did. the very first debate that trump was in raise your hand if you'd support the other candidates and he didn't raise his hand and of course he did it

again and desantis called him out and they've done that in two the first two debates raise your hand who would you vote off the island raise your hand if this and that and desantis has called him out on it both times and said just stop this we're not in school you know this is very disrespectful people we came here to talk about issues that Brett Baer they pay him so much money he's got a 32 million dollar home I guess you know he'll ask the questions that they want to ask but he asked him um uh Brett Baer said the letter that was used in the debate he said uh I haven't asked you this, but do you have regrets about that now? Looking back, knowing what you now know, just raise your hand if you regret this. And Panetta did not raise his hand.

He does not regret. He says, well, frankly, I haven't seen any evidence from any intelligence agency that this is not the case. So Baer says, you don't think that was real? And he says, I think the disinformation is involved here. I think Russian disinformation is part of what we're seeing everywhere. Finally asked him if he had any regrets over how he handled the story. No, I don't have any regrets about not trusting the Russians.

And you see, you know, when you look at this, of course, the CIA has always been about lies. The FBI agent that I interviewed, it's been decades now, he said, you know, it was embarrassing when we would go to other countries and the CIA was there and they would come in and they would just lie when they didn't need to lie. They would just make stuff up all the time and lie to the officials in this other country, the embassy officials. And everybody knew they were lying. They didn't care. See, from that standpoint,

Leon Panetta is exactly the kind of guy they're looking for. Jonathan Turley pointed out a couple of points here that Panetta refuses to acknowledge. Number one, American intelligence quickly debunked the claim and said there was no evidence of Russian disinformation behind the laptop. Number two, the emails contained in the laptop were quickly authenticated by other parties. Number three, the FBI authenticated the laptop.

Number four, Hunter Biden has since sued over the use of his laptop. And the last one here, the media has independently authenticated the laptop. This is the man in charge of our CIA. And Brett Baer doesn't challenge him on any of those five points. I don't know. That's why they pay him the big bucks, I guess, because he won't challenge him on these points. But all the CIA does is lie and of course the big liar who lied us into the iraq war weapons of mass destruction based on terror gina haspel was promoted by trump

to be the head of the cia of course eminently qualified um bablin b has declared declared Dylan Mulvaney man of the year. I haven't covered this. This is a last week. It came out because you had an LGBT magazine in the UK declared Dylan Mulvaney woman of the year. Well, Babylon B calls him man of the year. They said it's time once again to honor one man who's gone above and beyond to advance the cause of men and raise the bar for what other men seek to accomplish the babylon b has chosen

dylan mulvaney to receive the 2023 man of the year award because you know who else could get a woman to fall on their knees and worship them this day and age, right? As we saw done by Drew Barrymore to Dylan Mulvaney, the first time I ever saw him. And, you know, if you can get a woman to humiliate herself like that, boy, you must have some really powerful male stuff going there, I guess. I don't know. Mulvaney's true courage comes from taking the initiative to live within a world of his own imagination and then to stubbornly stay there with a will and determination that surpasses most other men the babylon b congratulates dylan mulvaney on being on his biggest year yet much like bud light mulvaney can only go up from here yeah well here's a story that is difficult to believe more difficult to

believe than that don't believe any as a woman and this is the fact that this guy got seven months in jail for a meme and they came after him he was sentenced yesterday when they came after him it was a meme that was making fun of hillary going back to the 2016 election trump versus hillary and they used a statute that could have resulted in him getting 10 years in jail it is a statute that is designed to stop people from interfering in elections you know kind of like the kkk and uh has done in the past or physically blocking things and things like that like the black panthers did in chicago remember that where they showed up and they uh scared people away from the polls of course they

were never charged with anything instead this guy was charged for putting this up. And it's like, hashtag, I'm with her. Hashtag, go Hillary. And he puts a meme there. Avoid the line. Vote from home. Text Hillary to 59925. And vote for Hillary and be a part of history and so forth and so on. Now, first of all, this is a satire.

Nobody really believes that they can vote from home. And it was a satire that was really done by the other side as well. Take a look at this. This is a video that's put up by somebody wearing a MAGA cap and saying, Hey, Trump voters, skip the poll lines and text in your vote. Texts are legit. Or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday. Same thing.

Same thing. Except she was a lot more explicit in terms of disinformation about voters. Well, they did nothing to her. Instead, the guy who did the Trump meme is going to jail for seven months. His name is Doug Mackey. Sentenced in New York City in a sham court. Because, you know, once we've seen New York City over and over again, sham and everything they do. But, of course, you knew that, didn't you?

Also, you know, if someone's dumb enough to fall for this, I think it's okay if we just kind of get their vote out of the system that's right it's a triage yeah any vote that gets siphoned off by this was a vote we didn't need it's an intelligence triage yeah but this is the weaponized political uh that we now see, especially in New York, a real travesty, if ever there was one. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about a Soros district attorney getting his comeuppance, getting a dose of his own policies. We'll be right back. Субтитры создавал DimaTorzok Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show.

All right, welcome back. And on Rockfan, Richard Williams. Thank you very much for the tip. He says, we can shout Maranatha until our last breath, as many saints have done, or we can focus on what God has before us now and trust him for our future. I agree with that. Thank you. Rockfan, thank you, Eric.

Appreciate that tip that's very kind thank you well let's talk about what happened to a district attorney in new orleans this guy was elected with a lot of soros money and he's been one of these people who doesn't like bail i interviewed the guy uh just last couple days i guess it was on monday i think or um i can't remember what day it was now it's so much stuff here i can't uh but anyway um we talked about bail and the importance of bail and about not just catching criminals and releasing them again on the street but that is his policy you know he doesn't want to keep lock these people up. And so he got carjacked at gunpoint there in New Orleans, the New Orleans District Attorney Jason Williams, the Soros District Attorney.

He was walking his 78-year-old mother to her car when two suspects approached the pair, pointed a gun at them, and demanded his car. The suspects then jumped in the car, drove off before abandoning the vehicle in an undisclosed location and carjacking a young woman in her area 30 minutes later, said the New Orleans Police Department. And I guess, you know,

when they caught these guys, this district attorney probably just turned him right out on the street. I mean, not only is he getting hoisted by his own batard, his own policies too, but he probably didn't do anything to these people either. He was elected in 2020 after Soros donated $220,000 to the Louisiana Justice and Public Safety Pack

to run campaigns against his opponent. He ran on a platform of social justice, promising to find alternatives to incarceration. There's an alternative to incarceration. Getting your own car carjacked. That's the alternative to incarceration. He's not learned that the hard way, but he hasn't learned his lesson. Maybe, I don't know if the voters have. And to reform the ineffective and unfair money bail system,

according to his campaign website. Now, $220,000 is not even a lot of money for George Soros. He has spent millions in some of these local district attorney races, you know, that in San Antonio and other places like that. But again, how long will it take for people to learn what is going on? And the most effective way that anybody can campaign against this kind of Soros money is to point out that their opponent is being funded by Soros for this stuff. Because it's hard to get people to understand why we need to have a money bail system

and why social justice reform is destroying places like San Francisco and now New Orleans and other places like that francisco and now new orleans and other places like that where even the district attorney gets carjacked let's take a look at what is happening um you know as we pointed out we talked about this you know even the jan january the six people uh when the guy with bail i said you know these guys many of them have been given decades in jail and they had to wait two or three years for their trial. I said, yeah, you look at how this has changed. You know, average of 60 days in jail when they had the money bail system.

And now the average is like 360 days or something like that. It's just amazing. Two years average, I think, in South Carolina, one of the states we're talking about. And because the alternative is you just either, you don't have the money bail system, you just immediately release people. Or you just keep them in jail until their trial. And it's very difficult to get a speedy trial anymore. Williams declined to prosecute 65% of all criminal cases in New Orleans in 2021. The DA still continues to prosecute on average only 44% of the criminals who have been charged by the police.

So, when we look at what has happened to the J6ers, as a matter of fact. The outrageous, the trials, the punishments that many people have been given, especially people like Joe Biggs with the Proud Boys. 17 years, the prosecutors asked for 33 years. And in general, what the judge was doing was giving about half of the draconian sentences demanded by the prosecutors and they were still draconian they were still excessive punishment far you know even half of what these people demanded was excessive but now the department of justice has appealed the sentencing i still don't see any evidence that the Proud Boys or any of the J6ers who've been given these excessive punishments, I don't see that they have filed any appeals.

But the Department of Justice has filed an appeal to get the sentences increased. It's absolutely amazing. And so they're going to appeal this, again, because they only got half of what they wanted. You know, Joe Biggs, they wanted him for 33 years. They only got 17, so they want to go for all 33. They filed notice of appeal papers on Monday, along with and another Proud Boy member who was convicted on different charges and sentenced to 10 years in prison. The response from Norm Pattis, who is defending Biggs and others, said Attorney General Merrick Garland needs to get a new hobby horse. He said this appeal is ridiculous.

Every part of this is ridiculous. I do hope that they appeal the sentence to the Supreme Court. It must be appealed, frankly. As we'll be talking later about the push to bring in more Palestinians, if they're going to be pushed out of Gaza, let's bring them to America, say many people. Well, Biden's border security has got one group of people, as we know, that he doesn't want. And those are Christian refugees. One segment of society that is feeling the full brunt of border security persecuted Christians. A report shows that Joe Biden and the White House has cut the

resettlement of Christians fleeing persecution around the globe by 70% compared to 2016. And a good example of this is this German family who's been here since 2005 or 2016. They even have two children who were born here. The anchor baby thing doesn't apply to them. Refugee status doesn't apply to them, and they're genuine refugees. They did not want to send, because of their religious beliefs, did not want to send their kids to a German school. It doesn't matter whether you agree with them. That's their religious belief.

And the German government had fines against them that were greater than their entire income. That's religious persecution. And they have not been given full residency under George W. Bush, under Obama, under Trump. And then under Biden, he decided that he wanted to deport them. They've now been given another year, extension, but they've just been doing this living by, you know, one year at a time, extension. Open Doors, which annually ranks 50 countries, it says, are the most difficult to live in as a Christian,

and World Relief, a global Christian humanitarian organization, issued a joint report in September that in 2022, the U.S. government resettled barely one-third of the number of Christian refugees who were granted asylum in 2016. Sounds like they got a problem with Christians. And remember this when people start pushing you

to bring in other groups from other places. Of course, the borders are wide open and we've got a lot of people coming in from countries that we are at war with nothing to be concerned about that right uh young male single male men in the 20s and 30s and nations that we are at war with coming through the border and uncontrolled numbers i'm sure there's nothing to worry about. In fact, in 2022, Christians resettled from the most threatening 50 nations for Christian persecution. Those were down 70% from six years earlier.

With Obama, in 2022 compared to 2016 when Obama was president, Eritrea Christian immigrants were down 85%. Those fleeing Iran were down by 95% Those fleeing Myanmar and Burma were down 92% Those fleeing Iraq were down 94% And so it is only 1,000 Christians From those four countries resettled last year Compared to nearly 13,000 Christians from those four countries resettled last year compared to nearly 13,000 in 2016. The document shows in April 2021, just after Biden took office,

as a point he's limited the refugee resettlement ceiling to just 15,000 a year. Historic low. Before 2017, when Trump got in, and evidently Trump cut it as well, the average resettlement was about $81,000 per year. But that has been cut. And in Chicago, they are giving illegal migrants $9,000 each to cover housing costs. But the most amazing thing is that if you look at the Biden administration and his war on Americans, the person that he has put in charge of deciding who gets refugee status is somebody who is a rabid hatred to America, to anyone who is trying to come in from Israel or anything else like that. But she's going to rubber stamp anybody who has her radical anti-colonizer views. She's been very clear about that. So again, just remember that when you look at this, I'm in favor of just stopping immigration for a while. Can we just have a breathing period here?

But more than that, we need to stop the magnet. And we need to also stop this push of refugees that are being pushed here by wars that are not necessary. Let's take a quick break, and when we come back, I have an interesting story that I'll give you. We'll be right back. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Give them back to me or I'll...

It's too late. There they are and there they'll stay. Give me back my slippers. I'm the only one that knows how to use them. They're no use to you. Give them back to me. Give them back. You're wondering, I guess, why I'm playing that. Well, there's actually a story about a man who was able to steal the ruby slippers from the movie.

And the people who had them as a collector's item were basically saying, give them back. They're of no use to you. And they really were of no use to him. You see, he thought they were real ruby slippers when he stole them back in 2005. And they subsequently found out that he's the guy who stole it. But he thought they were real rubies. And he took them to a pawn shop. And the person said, no, they're not actually ruby a Ruby slippers are made out of glass. I look at those

pictures there and it was mostly sequins that are on there. The Ruby sequence, how in the world could he be so stupid, uh, to look at this and really not understand the value of it, uh, to go to all the trouble to steal it, uh, from the museum. Um, They had them on display. It was on loan at this particular museum. It was on loan to the Judy Garland museum and the late actresses hometown of grand Rapids, Minnesota in 2005 from Hollywood memorabilia collector, Michael Shaw.

It was worth a lot to Michael Shaw. Just like she was saying, there are no use to you. Yeah. They're worth a lot to Michael Shaw. Just like she was saying. They're of no use to you. They're not made out of rubies. They're not even made out of really red glass. Slippers that we put sequins on. But it has a value to

this guy for its memorabilia stuff. But these slippers that had no intrinsic value, I guess they were kind of like the kind of like NFTs, real world NFTs. He thought they were real gems. And so he did this back in 2005. They finally caught up to him.

And he's now 76. He's in very poor health. He's facing his own death. These shoes, however, the real intrinsic value is the fact that there's only four authentic pairs that remain from the film. And so they took these things

that are mainly sequins and glass bead bows that have no intrinsic value, but they valued them at the time at $1 million. And so he snuck into the museum's emergency exit when the museum was closed. He smashed his way in with a sledgehammer, didn't sneak in, he smashed his way in. And then he removed them from their plexiglass encased display pedestal, thinking they were real rubies. When a stolen goods buyer informed him this isn't real, then he didn't want to have anything to do with them. But these were things that were worth a million dollars to somebody else.

He was not publicly linked to the crime until 13 years later when an FBI art crime team recovered the slippers in a sting operation after a man approached the insurer and said that he could help to get them back. The current market value is $3.5 million. Now, since this guy is not related to Joe Biden, he's looking at some serious jail time here. And so they rolled him into the courtroom in a wheelchair he's got a paper mask he was carrying an oxygen tank because again he is very sick and very poor health about to die 76 looking at a very long sentence here when they first got him he denied that he had stole the stuff but he came clean at this point in time.

And his lawyer said, well, I think Terry is facing his own mortality. And I think when people are reaching that point in life, they cut through the pleasantries and they talk turkey. Exactly right. Why is that? You know, he's going to go before the judge, the real judge, right? And just as he can't pay this $3.5 million, what if somebody came in the courtroom and said,

well, I'll pay the $3.5 million to the other people. Make this stuff go away. That is actually what Jesus did for us as we're going to face the judge. There's no way, just like this man, there's no way that we could repay what we have done. There's no way. And that's why Jesus came. The things that we have done that we valued so much, we realized that they were illusionary of no value whatsoever to us and that's true of the billionaires who spent their entire life um collecting stuff that everybody in this world wars to own you know elon musk is going to stand before god and he's going to realize that his

accomplishments as the richest man in the world no more valuable than these phony sequined slippers. And so that is where we are. You know, the other part of this that I thought was interesting was the fact that here he is, and he's about to die. He's not going to keep up the pretenses anymore. You know, he's going to tell people the truth. And so, you know know these deathbed confessions they carry a lot of weight that's why when we look at you know the look at the hospital stuff that's there uh the people on the palestinian side are saying well this many martyrs died and these martyrs did this and these martyrs did that uh martyrs are they have stolen that, they've repurposed that term, for the most part, for people who were suicide murderers. Martyrs, originally,

the Greek word was witness. And you had people who had witnessed Jesus and what he had done. And people who had been there refused to recant what they had seen, what they testified to, what they had written down. Those kinds of deathbed confessions carry a lot of weight for anybody who seriously thinks about it. But anyway, I thought that was an interesting story. So many of us chase these ruby slippers, and there's a lot of ruby slippers in everybody's life, isn't there? So let's talk a little bit about the parking lot thing that is happening here.

And I say the parking lot thing because it's the hospital thing. We've had all these different narratives. You know, we had the narrative that it was done by Israel. We had the narrative that it was done by Hamas. I played for you the clip yesterday. One person put it out there and said, see, listen to this. This is the sound of a JDAM missile. I think is the right acronym. And then here's the sound of the missile that hit the hospital. I said, well, I don't know. I don't know if that's the clip of it hitting the hospital or not. So we can't prove it by that. Then we had Israel put out a thing and said, well, here, we wiretapped this and we heard

these people with Hamas or Islamic Jihad or whatever the group is saying that they did this, they did it by accident, it failed and it landed here on the hospital and so forth. Well, I don't know that that's, you know, we got an audio tape, two guys talking. Anybody could do that. And so I don't know that's, you know, we got an audio tape, two guys talking. Anybody can do that. And so I don't know that's genuine either. As I said yesterday, we're not really going to know what happened with us. Why? Because everybody is lying to us on every side of this.

And if your reaction is, as we've seen on the streets of Europe, if your reaction is, let's kill all the Jews or let's kill all the Palestinians, if that's your reaction to what has happened, then the propaganda is working on you. And now we've come up with another one. This is coming out of Israel. It's being pushed very hard by WND, by Robbie Starbuck, by Alex Jones, Gateway Pundit. These people were pushing the idea that nobody died, essentially. And now pictures have surfaced after all of this panic saying that hit the hospital and all the rest of the stuff. Pictures have surfaced showing that the hospital is still standing. There's a massive crater adjacent to it. So, again, that helps to reinforce the possibility that this was a failed missile that landed there.

But, again, we don't know. And because this is hitting adjacent to the hospital, now you've got people who are inclined with their confirmation bias to support the side of Israel are now saying, well, nobody died. You know, that's the nobody died thing again. It's back. Look, if you've got a hospital full of people and a crowd, you understand that in these bombing campaigns, there's going to be a ton of casualties because you've got two and a half million people packed into 140 square miles. And they're even higher density in and around this hospital.

You got more than 6,000 people who are not even there for the hospital issues that are camping out in that area, camping out in the parking lot area. Why? Well, because they thought it would be safe there. They thought, you know, if I get close to the hospital, they're going to leave the hospital alone. And so they camp out there so even if it hit in the hospital you could still have several hundred people who died uh and

it's not going to be possible for us to prove to people's satisfaction because their confirmation bias whether this was a miss by israel or whether this was a Jihad missile that miss fired and then landed on him. I think that's the more likely scenario because of the high powered explosion that is there adjacent to the building. Probably would have taken that down, but still enough that if you've got people that are camping out there because they think that that is the um, uh, the safest place that is perhaps what happened. Uh, and, and it's interesting that, uh, as you've got this, that this went on for about 48 hours

before this came out. And, um, you know, you've got all these CIA says it's got satellite pictures and Biden says, it's not our team. I've seen the pictures and so forth. Why didn't they release that earlier? Do they want to have the reactions that they saw and the, uh, not to excuse, uh, the reactions, the reactions that you see across Europe, the burning, the riots and all the rest of stuff. Uh, none of that is, uh, excusable, but we had all kinds of disinformation put out there we had people who had put out information on the side of the idf as i pointed out yesterday uh saying uh we did it because you know they're shooting at people from the hospital so we we took that and then they

pulled that down then there were other things that showed um missiles and uh there's arguments about whether the time codes were legitimate or not. And those things were taken down. Then some other ones are put back up and so forth. Both sides are lying to you, you understand. Don't follow them into this war. Again, just like you take the audio recordings. Is this a missile? Is this the missile?

And this is what a JDAM sounds like. Is that an audio recording of that missile? This is what you hear people saying on a wiretap audio? Is that legitimate, real audio, or is that a skit? Right? Why would we believe any of this stuff? So anyway, it now appears that the hospital was not hit. Maybe it was a parking lot.

But again, I don't trust anybody in this, and neither should you. There's always a lot of confusion in war but there's always a lot of deliberate lies misinformation to weaponize this weaponize both sides of this so um anyway uh we're going to leave it at that point i'm not going to get any further uh into the hospital stuff we've got other news that i want to talk about before we're joined by our guest when we come back i'm going to talk about climate so stay with us we will be right back You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, this is an interesting story. And I've got to say, I felt a little bit of sympathy for the nun and some excitement and what she had done. We have a French nun who tackles an environmental protesters attempting to stop construction of religious center. And why?

Well, they say, well, we've got this rare plant here and it's going to destroy the environment. It's like, come on, you guys are so far past caring about the environment. We used to have dams that were held up because of a so-called snail darter and all you know rare animals they don't care about any of that stuff anymore

i mean they're out there putting up these massive wind farms and offshore wind farms that are killing whales killing eagles killing bats left and right and all they don't care about the environment they don't care about the wildlife whatever they just want their way and one of the reasons why i was sympathetic to what she did and i've got a clip of it by the way uh let's take a look uh this is um this is the flying nun i will call her because she takes a flying run and knocks this person on the ground tackles him this this much much bigger than she is uh i guess it's kind of a hail mary approach to try to stop these protests. Here she comes. She takes them down.

There you go. And then this guy, he's smashing that tube. Those tubes are part of the construction stuff. And so these people show up just to destroy things. Because that's what the so-called climate people do now. Just destroy stuff. And we see these people gluing themselves to the roads gluing themselves to showroom floors of you know the cars and blocking traffic blocking people who have to get to the hospital blocking people from getting to work or doing anything because they don't care

about anything other than their little agenda and they're completely deranged and so it was good to see her do that even if it was a hail mary attempt um trying to stop these climate crazies uh doing that type of stuff but um uh you know when we look at it their response was the guy says well i didn't expect that i expected the nuns to be a little bit reasonable you're not reasonable pal i mean who's this one of these crazy climate idiots. Reasonable. He says, I was attacked three times by five people who snatched me, who wanted to throw me out there. They decided to protect the site with their actions and with their bodies.

Well, you know, to throw you out of there, that's their property. It's their property. Of course, they don't respect any of that. They don't care what the truth is. They don't care what the truth is, and they don't care what anybody wants. None of this makes any difference to them. So the construction site was surrounded by a group of nuns from the missionary family of Notre Dame, forming a human chain around the area in order to stop the activists. But that didn't stop them, and so she ran into them. Following the confrontation, the nuns resumed a more peaceful stance, singing while blocking the surrounding protesters

from the flying nuns to the singing nuns. And this is some kind of jackfruit. It's nothing special that they say grows there. And they said they don't have the authorization to destroy the habitats of protected species. You know what? You don't have the authorization from us to destroy our way of life. You don't have the authorization to destroy our homes, to take our cars, to

take our appliances, to take our energy and our food and all the rest of the stuff. You don't have the authority to do that. And it's about time we push back on this stuff. Yeah. In Britain, for example, you know, talk about taking stuff from people. You have the guy who is now their infrastructure czar, the National Infrastructure Commission, the guy who is head of that.

He has come out explicitly saying, well, what we're going to do is we're going to shut down Britain's gas network. We're going to confiscate, uh, all of the, um, uh, gas furnaces. We're going to roll out heat pumps.

You're going to buy heat pumps and we're going to ban all private vehicles, not just the internal combustion engines, but all of them, electric vehicles included. This has always been part of it. This guy's name is Sir John Armit. He recommended that cities ban all private vehicles. And they're going to shut down the gas network.

They're going to spend billions of dollars to dig through the streets and the homes and everything and rip out the gas lines. Because they said, well, if we don't let anybody have any gas, then these things are eventually going to collapse and there'll be a hazard. So let's spend billions of dollars to rip this out. No, they want to make sure that you don't have any infrastructure coming up. He's urging the prime minister there, Rishi Rich, to commit to a total ban on gas boiler sales by 2035 and set out how the National Gas Network will be shut down gradually

and permanently over the next 27 years. This document that he put out, the National Infrastructure Assessment. How cynical. To talk about infrastructure, all they're doing is destroying infrastructure. These people are depopulationists. They want to kill us. They want to kill our way of life, everything. They are destroyers.

They sow the seeds of chaos, and it's all for the purpose of destroying everything about our lives and destroying our lives themselves. So they're calling for 1.3 billion pounds a year to be spent on heat pumps for poor homes, 1.9 billion pound grants worth 7,000 pounds each for other homeowners to buy heat pumps that are not suited to the cold weather of the UK. Gas boilers need to be phased out and replaced with heat pumps. Say you,

who are you to say that? Who are you to say? Why? Why? There is no public policy case for hydrogen either to be used to heat individual buildings. It should be ruled out as an option as well. Because see,

it has to be about central control. You can't have any, you can't have hydrogen gas, you can't have natural gas, you can't have gasoline or petrol, you can't have diesel. It's got to be something that they control through their electric grid, centrally controlled through the grid, only power. Because again, it's all about central control. It's not about emissions. It's not about climate. It's not about protecting species. This is about central control.

Now, the useful idiots that are out there trying to stop other people, well, they may not understand it. They may think that it is really about that stuff, but it is not about that stuff. And so, hang on just one second. We have, as one narrative says, what people are calling anti-science is just anti-authoritarianism. It's not science to censor people. It's not science to shut down skepticism.

As a matter of fact, that is the essence of science, questioning what the conventional wisdom is, questioning what the authorities say. You know, when Francis Bacon came out with his scientific method, he put that in opposition to what he called academia, which is that the people in authority, the people in authority, the people in universities, would tell you what was true and we would all agree with that and do whatever they said. Now, this is an interesting case. Now, this is from the BBC. And they did a little video report.

And they said, melting glaciers reveal a past that has been hidden for centuries. They said with global warming of glaciers, the glaciers are melting, and now we're seeing a secret history that has been hidden for millennia. The discoveries have given rise to a new field of study, glacial archaeology. And so they're finding all of these things that people have put in these other areas that have long been lost, and they're doing archaeological finds. But here's the obvious question. So when these things were put there, there weren't any glaciers there. So that means that the temperatures millennia ago were kind of like they are now,

except maybe even warmer for a longer period of time. And of course, millennia ago, it wasn't all these things that these infrastructures are and everything are working so hard to try to get rid of, right? All that stuff was there. It was not man-made and it was warmer at that point in time. Amazon is now jumping, however, onto a new climate change stress test. This is the way this is going to be rolled out one of the

reasons why these corporations love esg it's not just because they're being blackmailed by black rock yes that's it's coming through them you know you do what we say vanguard and black rock and you know there's one other and they've got about 30 trillion dollars worth of investments in these other companies and it's like well we'll dump your stock and destroy your country company. If you don't do what we say, well, it's also these, these corporations are going to be stakeholders. A good example of this is Amazon and Amazon wants to be able to deliver things by drone. They're going to start delivering drugs by, by drone, right?

Because, um, you know, food's not essential, but drugs are. And just can't get it to you fast enough. So they're going to have, in terms of drone delivery, Amazon has weaseled its way in to know that they're going to be allowed to do drones. But it's also been made very clear that we can't just have everybody out there doing drone deliveries. We're going to have to control this. And so only the responsible people, which will be the big Wall Street corporations, will be able to allow this stuff. It's just going to be another way that they shut down avenues of business to small businesses.

But this is a big way to shut down small businesses as well. The climate change stress test. It's going to be coming for Amazon sellers and suppliers. Starting in 2024, Amazon is going to be joining other giant companies, multinational stakeholders, holding the stake over our hearts, Microsoft, Walmart, Apple, and others, and their decarbonization efforts. And so what this is going to involve, to make it short because we've got Sheriff Mac ready to join us here, what it involves is a massive amount of reporting from small businesses.

And they admit it's going to drive a lot of small businesses out of the market. And that's why they're doing it. It's the same thing that the Consumer Financial Protection Board did to drive out the small and medium-sized banks. Well, we're going to come up, we don't like this loan process stuff that was done by all the banks. And so to keep that from happening again, we are going to have lots and lots of paperwork and other things like that. And the small and medium-sized banks just had to get out of certain loan markets because they couldn't comply with the paperwork requirements. And they're saying the same thing is going to happen now.

In order to fill out all this paperwork requirement to be able to sell stuff to Walmart or to Amazon, once they get essentially a de facto monopoly marketplace, they'll squeeze you out because you won't be able to do the paperwork. Or maybe we should call it the paper woke that's going to be required for this. So let the black market begin. Let's let the black market. Better start finding ways that we can sell to each other, that we can get around all of this stuff. They said eight in 10 small and medium-sized business owners

say they lack the funds to do this. They don't have the right skills, say 63%, so they don't have the right skills. 43% said they lack the fun, but they said, oh yeah, it's a real high priority to us. Folks, we gotta not live by their lies. We got to not say when they say, is this a high priority? Oh, yes, yes, I want you to like me.

No, you got to point out their lie. And you got to say, I'm not participating in this. It's total BS. And a survey from Intuit QuickBooks, and remember Intuit QuickBooks was going to shut down all gun retailers and gun manufacturers because Bank of America and J.P. Morgan told them

to. But Intuit QuickBooks says two-thirds of small business owners say they were taking steps to reduce their environmental impact such as recycling and using renewable materials. If they ask you a question like that, tell them to go pound sand. The sooner we start our own networks of this stuff, the better. Because these people, I said, it's also going to target restaurants.

You see, they want to shut down the farms with their made-up nitrogen fear claims. No food, no farms, no food. And of course, another part of that is going to be no restaurants, especially because restaurants are one of the few businesses that were left for people to be able to compete as entrepreneurs. All right, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to be right back with Sheriff Mack, who is feeling the full brunt of Southern Poverty Law Center's Prophets of Hate, P-R-O-F-I-T-S. We'll be right back. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.

They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com All right, joining us now is Sheriff Mack of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, CSPOA. It's.org, isn't it, Sheriff Mack? Yes,.org. CSPOA.org, okay. And he's facing a swarm of persecution.

This is a Marxist tactic. They focus, they single out one group or one person, and then they all attack them at the same time. And that appears to be what is happening now with the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. Thank you for joining us, Sheriff Mack. Tell us a little bit about what is being directed at you right now. Well, David, thanks. It's great to see you again.

We go way back. Oh, yeah. But, yeah, it's living proof that what we're doing is working because they're scared. And they're so scared. They're willing to lie and put out all these lies about us uh they publish they publish uh all sorts of lies about us and it's like they're following us around yeah uh and and literally there are some that are following us around and it's uh it's kind of the epitome of stalking uh but you know i don't mind them coming to our training seminars. Yeah, let's talk about that first.

Let's talk about why they're afraid of you, because they're afraid of the Constitution and they're afraid of constitutional sheriffs, right? Tell us a bit about the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, and then I think that'll give a lot of people an insight into why the Southern Poverty Law Center and all these other people don't like you. So tell us a bit about the Constitution and sheriffs. It started when i was a sheriff and i sued the federal government i sued the clinton administration over the overreach

of government associated with the brady bill and it was the first time in history where the federal government ordered and mandated and commanded the sheriffs to enforce a federal statute for them and and first of all they can't tell your sheriff what to do and they know it. But they tried. And then I started this whole movement to say no to them and tell them to shove it and filed a lawsuit. And then six other sheriffs across the country joined me. This was all the sheriffs in the nation were ordered by the Brady Bill, by Congress, by the president to enforce this so-called law for them.

And if we didn't, it came with a threat of arrest. David, people think I make this up. It said whoever knowingly fails to comply is subject to a $10,000 fine, a year in prison, or both. I could have gone to fine, a year in prison or both. Wow. I could have gone to prison for a year. So anyway, we got an injunction against the Clinton administration for being able to attack me or come near me. I literally had an order of protection so that they couldn't come and arrest me at two

o'clock in the morning and bring their SWAT team, you know, and so forth and haul me off with the dog barking, or they probably would have shot my dog because they don't like dogs to bark at them. And my children crying and my wife going crazy, watching me be hauled off. And so we did get an injunction. And it's all part of the record. But this gave birth to the constitutional sheriff movement saying we're not just going to sue anymore, we're going to tell you no. If you go outside

your lane of traffic we will tell you no, you can't do that there are certain things you cannot do here going to court on every legal issue would be impossible, there's not enough time and there's not enough money we just need people in the states we need governors, we need state legislatures. We need county commissioners.

And we need absolutely the bottom line, the sheriff, to stand with the people in his county and tell the federal government and state bureaucracies as well, there's a few things you're not going to do here. And if you want to do something here you better check with me first yes this is just strictly obeying and following and enforcing the constitution there's nothing violent about it we have we've had sheriffs all over the country do this no one has ever been hurt no one has ever been threatened with with uh death or anything else like that it's never happened the proof is there but they're still saying and they get these pundits like mary mccord the idiot from texas she says oh this is all about violence and this is all about uh see and this is what nonsense

this has never been the case look at what i said and look and look at what I've done. I went through the peaceful process to get a Supreme Court victory for us. I got it. And now you say we're violent and we should be, everybody in the nation should be scared of us. Why? We should be scared of communism communism and tyranny and uh unilateral government that make appoints itself king and dictator and this marxist movement to destroy america is real and we're trying to stop that and the people that are in charge of doing it are getting really mad at us that's right they should be afraid of these federal agents who are extending their tentacles into everything and demanding that people do things and initiating force against people. What you're doing is non-commandeering. You know, that's a principle that's been supported.

Well, that's interesting because this case is called the commandeer case. Yeah. The commandeering case. And so, yes, this is anti-commandeering. Yes. They want to come in and they want to take command and they want to start ordering you to attack people in your area and to make you subordinate to them as a tool of their tyranny. And so we've had courts that have supported you and have supported many other areas of this where there is a non-commandeering. You cannot come in and tell people at the state government level that they have to do what you say. It is a passive thing.

It is a passive resistance. It's like, I'm just not going to do this. I'm not going to participate in your tyranny. It's not like you're coming out there to resist them. You're just saying, hey, I'm not going to help you with this. I'm not going to do this. And it's also about nullification. You know, I've talked to Michael Meharry with the 10th Amendment Center many times, and he said, you know, when we look at this and we look at the non-commandeering laws and we look at the different

alternatives that we got to an overreaching federal government, you know, you can just submit to this tyranny. If you get really angry, you say, all right, I want to just secede. You know, of course, there's a lot of people that are saying that on both the left and the right, but that's going to result in a war and a battle, as we know. But he said the middle path is nullification. I'm just not going to do what you say. And that's not an aggressive thing.

That is not. You're not the one who's initiating this force. It's the federal government who's initiating this force. And you're simply not going to go along with it because of what the constitution says and we saw this all in 2020 when we had the local sheriffs who said uh i'm not going to enforce these laws uh to tell people they got to wear masks or they got a social distance you know that was the peaceful there was about 500 over 500 sheriffs that did that nationwide yes and i've told people i tell people all the time you know i said look i don't like trump i don't like biden i don't like any of these guys quite frankly and none of them are going to save you you spend all the time, look, I don't like Trump. I don't like Biden. I don't like any of these guys, quite frankly. And none of them are going to save you.

You spend all your time focused on the race and the level of government where you have the least leverage and where you have the least say-so. And on the one office where you have the least leverage, I said, you need to figure out who your local sheriffs are, because as we saw through this pandemic, it's not a theory. The people who had it better or who even had it worse, it depended on the sheriff. The sheriff could make it much worse than the feds and the state even wanted, or they could stand in the gap and say, well, you're not going to enforce that. I'm not going to enforce that for you. I'm not going to do that. We just saw that in New Mexico with Governor Grisham's orders. Yeah.

And you had Democrats who stood up to her. And the sheriff and the chief of police and the AG standing against her. And they were all Democrats. And they were all Democrats. They're all liberal Democrats. And so we're not going to enforce that law. And it ended it. You know, and she, everybody, whether the courts or whether it was the local district attorney or the chief of police or the sheriff of the county,

everybody said, we're not going to enforce that law. They stopped it. Yeah. And was anything violent about that? No. They just refused to participate and said, she's out to lunch. Yeah. She's not following the Constitution.

The sheriff said, Sheriff Allen, said, this is impossible to enforce. And I'll tell you why. Because it's unconstitutional. That's why we can't enforce it. It used to be her thugs. She wanted them to use violence against other people and be unconstitutional, unlawful thugs. And they said, no, we're going to follow the Constitution. That's what your whole organization is about.

Yeah. And, you know, really, the secession thing, I think it's one of the solutions, but I don't advocate for that. But I will tell you this. I believe there's three solutions left. Three. And they're all very bold. MSN that the Democrats are now suggesting that we have two countries in America. And I'm getting where I agree with that. Yeah. Because we're going to succumb to all of this tyranny in Washington, D.C. And with the Marxists and Democrats that are going Marxist and socialist and extremism, extremism on the left is going to destroy the rest of us. Yeah. extremism extremism on the left is going to destroy the rest of us yeah and so they actually marked up a map that showed which which states should stay as a liberal america or socialist

america and then the others that are conservative america i actually agree that that's one of the solutions for us if we're going to survive i saw the other one that i said before you go into the second one let me talk about that because the very first guest that i had on my show my very first program back in um august of 2017 they were very upset you know it'd only been a few months since trump had taken office took office in january 2021 so here it is in august and i was aware that there were a lot of people in california who were putting together a movement to secede because they didn't like Trump. And so I got a hold of them. And my first guest was somebody from a leftist group in California who wanted to secede.

And my statement to her was, what can I do to help you? Yeah. I would like for you to be. Exactly. Because we've seen this over and over again. If you look at the Scandinavian country. Yes. They've come together and set apart in various combinations without a war many times. You're absolutely correct. Send California and Oregon and Washington and Illinois and a few others, obviously.

Send them. Yes. Go. New York, especially. New Jersey. Send them to their own country and let them implode on themselves. But now they keep trying to take us all with them. And that's so. The other solution is that we all moved to the same three or four states.

All of us. And we would have to decide. And you know what? Patriots won't do that. Even the elderly who are retired who could do it still won't do it. And it's a matter of survival that we try to do that. And we can't. And so, you know, New Hampshire was trying that back about 10 years ago with the first state project. And they said, everybody should move here. We're going to make ourselves a completely constitutional state. And obviously that didn't work. I'm telling you, we have to live in the same place. We have to have two different countries

divided, or we have the states and the counties and the sheriffs stand against this and stop this tyranny from taking over our entire country and ruining our Constitution and our Constitutional Republic. That's right. Otherwise, our survival is in real dire straits. do in the last 15 years trying to get sheriffs to simply take a stand and enforce and defend the constitution and they've already promised in god's name in their oath that that is what they would do but still some of them are so shy about doing that yeah i don't know why and that's kind of the nullification option you know we're saying we're not going to participate in this we're not going to be commandeered in this i agree i. I think that is the best of these things. As I was saying, you know, you had the Scandinavian nations have joined and split apart and joined in various combinations.

They never had a war. But in America, because of our history of secession and in so many other areas, and, of course, we know that, you know, our government would come against states that do that. As you pointed out, the Free State Project in New Hampshire, they were not able to get enough people to move there. We were in the situation, we were in Austin, a socialist place that's like California Island in the middle of Texas. And it wasn't even really much better during the pandemic. I was completely fed up with a Republican-led government that was in the community where we were there just outside of Austin. And it's like, well, I don't see the sheriff standing up for anybody and doing anything.

And so it's like, you know, we got to get out of this place. And, you know, we traveled through Tennessee here, and we saw that everybody was really relaxed about the masks and all that kind of stuff in early 2020. And so, you know, we came here. And, you know, Sheriff Mack, in terms of all this pistol brace stuff for example um i talked to a state legislator here uh state senator nicely and i talked to him about this pistol brace stuff he said we've already taken care of that we passed a law saying that you can't force us to uh that if you got a law at the federal level that contradicts our state law uh we're not going to enforce that you can't force us to do that

and then he said and then we put in a state law saying the pistol braces are uh legal and so it's like it's that type of thing you have to have state and local legislators and people i mean you're gonna have those dangerous pistol braces you're going to have those horrible pistol braces oh my it's a way to help it's a way to hold a gun a little better especially for somebody who's who's handicapped yeah that's it or disabled gun shoot fast that's right yeah or disabled it's such nonsense it is and and i think you really touched on a point though with your nullification we have always had since the beginning of our country, nullification, especially when you consider jury nullification. And that's we the people. We the people are in charge of every criminal case and most civil cases as well.

That's done by we the people, and we have the power to nullify everything that goes to court that this government's doing, except Trump was not allowed a jury trial in New York because it was just monetary. And I don't know why. The Seventh Amendment says in common law cases that exceed 20, the value of the controversy is over $20. A jury shall be enjoyed, shall be guaranteed. And yet here's Trump, no jury. He requested a jury and it was denied him. And of course, New York state. So yes, that just shows again,

they're anti-constitution and dividing the country. We're already divided. Oh, yeah. Yeah, we're divided over Trump. We are extremely divided. Yeah. So let's, yeah, let's make it permanent. Let's make it official.

Yeah, jury nullification is very important. And, of course, we've had situations for a long time where judges will lie to juries and tell them exactly the opposite. One of the guys. That of the things that I think that's interesting is, um, even on the left, you know, before we had a lot of States that would legalize marijuana, uh, that one of the guys I interviewed was a New Jersey weed man. And, uh, they got him and they were going to, because he had enough, uh, marijuana, they were going to charge him as a dealer. And he looked at it and he said, you know, I think that I can get a jury to nullify this because most people think it ought to be legal here in New Jersey.

And so he represented himself because he couldn't get a lawyer who would argue for jury nullification. They're afraid of that and afraid of the judges. And so it was in actually the New Jersey state constitution that said the juries are there to judge the law, not just the facts of the case, but to judge the law and what the penalties will be. And so he printed it up on a card and he put it up on his desk and showed it to the jury and the judge says, take that down right now. And he said, well, it was too late. They'd already seen it and I'd already said it.

And he said, disregard what he just said. But he got seven people to vote to acquit him and five people. Disregard the law. Yeah, exactly. Disregard the law. Yeah, exactly. Disregard the law. And judges lie about that all the time. And so they came after him a second time. And he got a different judge and he did the same thing.

And that judge let that stay up there. And he got a 12 to 0 acquittal. And so that's the power of jury nullification. Yeah, good for him. And that's the power of jury nullification. They don't want you to have it. Part of that is to overcharge people and get you to plea bargain with it because it's like well hey if i lose look i'm going to go to jail for life type of thing but you know it's also when you talk about nullification sheriff mac i have a guest that's

been on several times his name is matt trojala and he's got a book called the doctrine of the lesser magistrate it's a very thin book he yeah handed this out to police officers and sheriffs and stuff and and really changed their mind it's such a powerful book you should sell it at your conventions if you don't already uh it's an excellent probably should i i have read it uh but i have several books already and and my county sheriff america's last hope book i think is equal to his uh everybody needs to read that book the county sheriff america's last hope it's on our website cspoa.org everybody should get that and the proper role of law enforcement probably another and everybody should have this tiny little pocket-sized booklet this is the victory for state sovereignty it's really small when you

see it on our website it looks real big but it's just because of the picture this is the victory for state sovereignty it's really small when you see it on our website it looks real big but it's just because of the picture move on screen here so move it a little bit to your uh let's see yeah that's good right there yeah right there yeah that's good okay tell us about it this is this is simply it has the state flags on all of it and this is simply a reader's digest review of my supreme court case and And it's the most powerful ruling in the history of our country that says nullification is fine. States have the authority to be doing this. The federal government does not have carte blanche authority. They are very limited.

It says the federal government was only granted discrete enumerated powers and then he says and that is rendered express by the assertion of the 10th amendment the 10th amendment must be asserted and who's going to do that the states must enforce the 10th amendment and this decision makes that very clear everyone in america should have this book in their pocket and be ready to hand it to somebody else it's the most freedom enhancing decision it probably in the in the last 100 years in america oh i hope you need to see that decision look it up mac v us uh prince and i sheriff prince and i were the ones that are on that. His name's on it as well, P-R-I-N-T-Z for Montana. So the Mack Prince case is something that every single one of you should be totally familiar with

so that we can start nullifying more and protecting our God-given liberties. And that's all this is about. That's right. That's very important. And, you know, when you go back and we look at the Dobbs case that overturned roe v wade i was saying for the longest time and that's what your case said was that you know the federal government can't do this unless they've got the power to do it and so they shut that down and kicked it back to the states and i said that's great i was saying that all along i said you know we had roe v wade and that was that was a case that came out of texas i said the response from Texas should

have been well the Supreme Court's made their decision let's see them enforce it which is what Andrew Jackson said when they uh disagreed with what he was doing with the trail of tears which was a bad policy you know they reversed themselves within one year it was a bad policy what he was doing but he had the authority to do it and and so you know when they changed their mind within one year and said no you first they said you can do it then they said you can't do it and and so you know when they changed their mind within one year and said no you first they said you can do it then they said you can't do it and he said well you made your decision i want to see you enforce it and so that's the key thing it's the enforcement aspect of it and i said you know we should have a long time ago before we lost over 60 million

babies we should have had the states stand up and say the same thing you don't have the authority to make a decision about when life begins and yet we've got politicians now who decide they want to try to refederalize this thing it's very important people understand the 10th amendment and and that case that you had is a landmark decision about the 10th amendment very important very important yeah it is and we need to understand the whole situation there the sheriffs are the only elected law enforcement authority anywhere in the United States, in every state, they are the only elected. That in itself is where they get their power because the people bestow all power and he reports directly and only to the people. Kevin Patton

And that's why this can happen. We've had hundreds of sheriffs doing this. Right now, we need 1,000 sheriffs doing this. That means we need about 700 more. And, folks, you can help. You've got to have, one, you've got to be a member with us and be a member of the CSPOA and then work with your sheriff to become a constitutional sheriff and erect these barriers with you. He can't do it without you. He needs you.

You're part of this. You're his supervisor. You're his boss. So there must be a cohesive cooperation and relationship between we the people, the people of his county, and the sheriff. If you don't get that relationship, you're not going to be able to pull this off. And it's the simplest solution for what's going on in America. He can and we can erect those barriers against the encroachments of the federal government. I agree.

And what you're saying is people can become, you don't have to be a law enforcement officer to become part of the CSPOA. Everybody can join. It's our people's part of the CSPOA. Everybody can join. It's our people's posse, CSPOA posse. So it's on there. It's only $11 a month. Become a member. Be a part of this.

Help finance this amazing movement that really is a peaceful and effective solution. And quite frankly, it's the only peaceful and effective solution left, except for us moving to those places. I said, or we become two different countries. We already are divided. We might as well make it official. I agree. Yeah.

But it's important for people with you. It's important for people to stand with the sheriff. Everybody's seen the movie high noon with Gary Cooper where, you know, they leave him tall. Yeah. They leave him to the to the wolves coming and leave him by himself. You know, you can't leave these guys out there either by themselves.

You can join together with us and encourage them to do the right thing. Stand with them when they do the right thing. And that's the only way this is going to happen. And I agree. I actually mentioned Gary Cooper's High Noon in my one of my books. I think I believe it's in the County Sheriff of America's Last Hope. Good. Yeah, that's a great movie and great example of what this is all really about.

We have to stand collectively. You know, when I interviewed Gerard Griffin, one of the things he said stuck with me, he said, we have to stand collectively for individual freedom. That's something that's difficult for people who are so focused on individual freedom. We don't like collectivism. We don't like groups. We don't like belonging at the clubs and all this other kind of stuff. But we've got to do it. When it comes to freedom, we love it.

Yeah. But to have our freedom, we've got to act collectively. And that's something that's difficult for us to grasp as we focus so much on the individual. We have to come to that. Now that we've reiterated what we do, CSPOA, folks, is there any question as to why the Southern Poverty Law Center is going after us with a vengeance, lying, lying, and lying about Sam Bushman and me. Sam Bushman does his constitutional thing on his Liberty Roundtable radio show, and he's the CEO of CSPOA. And we've needed so much help, and I'm so busy with my wife doing my schedule. I just got back from a 12-day tour in Minnesota and South Dakota, and there are sheriffs raring to go especially in south dakota and they're

defending this jared bosley who doesn't want his land dug up by the uh carbon solutions people and companies uh and he's not going to cooperate with them and they're going to have to go around his property because he doesn't want well tell us about that case so so uh what is going on with this what are they trying to do well they're trying it's just like fracking they they want to go on these people's property and and start digging and go put a underground uh tunnel uh through their property which obviously to dig all that and go under their property uh and these property owners say we're farmers we don't want to be we want to be left alone leave us alone we're not cooperating you're you're not a government entity i don't have to do eminent domain with you you're a private business and these guys are trying to

do something for the environment which is probably bogus anyway but uh they're trying to do carbon um is it sequestering a carbon? They're trying to bury it in the ground or something? Is that it? Or transport it. So I thought they were trying to transport it somewhere. Yeah, probably transporting somewhere where they pump it into the ground. That's another crazy thing.

It's like cutting down trees and burying trees and everything. It's absolutely insane. But, you know, I've seen this from the other side, Sheriff Mack. You know, I support the use of functional fuels fuels i call them instead of fossil fuels and but you know my objection to the pipelines was the fact that they were coming in and that they gave eminent domain to corporations in the case of the pipeline the xl pipeline they gave eminent domain to a foreign corporation out of canada and then they were stealing the farms and rendering large areas of them useless, places that people have been there for over a century.

So it's a difference between, you know, regardless of how this is going to be used, whether it's going to be used for some kind of a crazy climate fantasy or if it's going to be used for real fuel, we can't give eminent domain to these corporations. It began with a Kelo versus London and Connecticut, and the Supreme Court made the wrong decision there. And now, after saying, well, we can take private land, not for public use, but for a corporation's use, now they're just turning it over to let the corporations start to take that land without any other reason, and even foreign corporations. So that has to be resisted.

So the federal government is trying to enforce this. Is that what is happening with um uh the local local government is uh and i'm sure the federal government's going to get involved uh the company has been offering uh the county uh thousands and thousands tens of thousands of dollars if they'll just help them so bribery is now coming into it uh but this farmer jared bosley i spent some time with him i actually got on his combine and we were harvesting i i went with him to harvest soybeans and i was amazed about the technology and the work that he and his son did together uh and this family just simply wants to be left alone and they have that right. I don't care what his reason is.

That's right. I don't care. It's his castle. He owns it. And he does it with his family. And he wants to be left alone. So I'm going to tell you right now. Carbon solutions.

What is it? Summit carbon solutions. You have to leave him alone. and you have to go around that's america yes and the judge who ordered that they allow them to come in and survey their land uh was way out of line because this guy said no and the sheriff there is not going to cooperate with this anymore and uh you know i i told him i said well you know let's make the best of the of the order there i said but the next time uh you and the judge are going to have to set you're going to have to set the judge straight this is his property and there is

no legal reason that he should be required by law or by the judge, but not by law, by an incorrect order from the court, that he has to cooperate with this private business. He does not. He does not. And so, this is what we've been working on, folks, and we're doing this nationwide. And the sheriff, the constitutional sheriff is the peaceful, effective solution to all of this. Folks, get involved in this. Come on board with us. Join us in this holy cause. And so, of course, now we're, because we're doing, we're making headway, IREHR, Human Rights Group, something or other, with liar Devin Burkhart, he sent emails to all the sheriffs in Minnesota telling them to stay away from me, that I was dangerous and that I'm a racist and I'm

anti-Semitic. I've never been anti-Semitic in my life. I don't even know what anti-Semitism is. I didn't grow up with it at all. My freshman class teacher mrs greenbaum was my favorite teacher i didn't know i didn't know greenbaum was a jewish name i didn't care what name i didn't care and no one else did yeah and jeannie bellman uh she was a jew i okay so we had different religious beliefs so i like eddie kane and he was catholic I like Jeannie, she was Jew. She was Jewish. I like Willie and Leroy, and they had a different church to go to. And I went to one of their churches once. It was an amazing, amazing piece of Americana. And so now, my mom brought us up to accept all people and to be kind to everyone.

It didn't matter what color you were or who your daddy was or what your religion was. And my mom trained us to do that. And now they're bad-mouthing my mother, saying what a horrible lady she was. And they haven't brought her name up or her position up. But they're saying that I am a racist. That means my mom was okay with that. And I'm telling you, folks, she raised us just the opposite. My DNA is just the opposite. And these people do not care. They're liars. Anti-defamation league has defamed me over and over that I'm racist and anti-Semitic. So, I tried to call, I saw Jonathan Greenblatt on Fox News, and he was talking about all of this stuff going on

between Hamas and Israel. I really was impressed with him, so I left word at Anti-Defamation League that I would like to talk to him because his people have defamed me and sorely mistreated me and mischaracterized me and so far i've gotten nothing back except they acknowledged that they got my email so i guess that's what they're supposed to do beforehand i think musk uh he was a good man i think musk nailed him i think he said just take off the ante there you're just the defamation league and they will defame people by calling you we've seen this from the left and unfortunately there are really racist people out there but they give them a pass because they call everybody racist that's just their first line of attack and i've been called racist rolling stone just hit us too rolling stone him davison

and and his boss were in touch with him. You know what Rolling Stone has done, David? They defended Ice-T who did Killer Cop rap. And it went viral and people got mad at him and anti-deaf, Rolling Stone defended him and said he was a great person. And now we're being lied about and they're coming after us. Wow.

Because of what? And yes, you know what? There are books out there about Martin Luther King that say he's a real horrible person. Some people bring those up. I don't. Mm-hmm. Okay? But this is the thing.

The FBI did illegal monitoring and wiretapping on Martin Luther King. Why aren't we bringing that up and saying all this illegal stuff that was brought out by him and even tried to commit extortion against him and blackmail that they were going to give all his sexual exploits that they had on him to his wife? And so I'm against all of that. Yes. And I quote Martin Luther King in my presentation. And Martin Luther King was arrested over 30 times and never committed a crime. Never committed a crime. And yet we don't want to learn from that.

And Rosa Parks was arrested for not giving her seat to a white man in America. She was arrested for that. her seat to a white man in America. She was arrested for that. And we preach against that. We show a movie clip about Rosa Parks getting arrested. We say, what would a constitutional sheriff do in that situation? Or what would you do now if it's an Amish farmer who's being abused by the FDA or USDA? Why do we allow the government to arrest them? And like the federal government's in

charge of every ranch and farm in this entire country are you kidding they have no authority to be doing that and so we're trying to create peace and have people left alone of all races and anti-defamation league and rolling stone and splc and irhr and all these others and and jessica pischko a private uh author or a journalist uh is going after oh she even said she's gone to so many of my seminars uh she's like follows me around the country she's been to so many of them she can't help but tell a little bit of the truth she said this sheriff mac cloaks himself in respectability, but it's dangerous. Some people say when she's the one who's saying it, yeah. That's the typical thing that they do.

You know, it's interesting. You go back to look at the Southern Poverty Law Center. You were talking about Martin Luther King. The history of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Morris Deese only was involved in the civil rights movement in order to defend the Ku Klux Klan that beat the Birmingham marchers and set their buses on fire. And he made what was equivalent to the median family income defending the Ku Klux Klan. And then he got out of law for about a decade and he started running a mail order business. And then he got back into

the politics side of things when he said i'll give you my mail uh mail order list uh mailing list names to the carter administration uh if um uh i'll uh i'll do this for free for you if you'll give me your mailing list is what it was and and so they did that and so he got the mailing list democrats and then he became this crusader against the ku klux klan and against all racism and all the rest of this stuff when he set out the entire civil rights movement except to defend the ku klux klan that's when he founded splc yeah that's right he's the founder of splc and and even liberals talk about what a grifting organization it is and how they've got hundreds of millions of dollars in offshore bank accounts and all the rest of the stuff and how they spend very little of their money on their stated causes. But I've been attacked by this. They attack everybody that they disagree with politically.

And I'm glad that, you know, they. Let me let me ask you a question. Have you ever voted for a grandpapa of the KKK? Have you ever voted for a person like that? No. I haven't. No, yeah, that's right. Have you ever spoken at a funeral for a KKK leader?

No. I haven't. No? Well, Joe Biden has. Yeah. And Joe Biden was really buddy-buddy with Robert Byrd. And the Democrat Party supported Robert Byrd. And the Democrat Party has a long and sordid history of racism.

But I don't. But now they're trying to create one for me. But they ignore Robert Byrd and Joe Biden's huge friendship. And Joe Biden admitted that they were close personal friends. And he spoke at his funeral yes i i deplore all of that and hillary and all them you know all the all the democrats all the big democrats all the big lefty democrats loved robert bird and uh they had absolutely no problem with what he did but you know they throw that out it is a false accusation i think you know they

came after me and there's no question he was part of of the KKK and, and he was a higher, uh, ranking, uh, officer in the hierarchy. Oh yeah. No, I'm not saying that's a false. I'm not saying that's false. I'm saying that what they do is they make false accusations about everybody else in terms of racism. They showed their hand when they, um, started, uh, doing hit pieces in, um, March 2020, in the first part of April, I was singled out by these people, the same people attacking you, because I said it was medical martial law. Now, there's nothing racist about that, right?

But these people who say they're all about racism and hate, what's the hate in that? I do hate martial law. And I hate wearing a mask, and so now that makes me what yeah that makes me that makes me a mask hater and i'm uh i guess i'm racist against masks i don't know it gets really stupid but they've shown their they've shown their hands they they've shown the fact that uh what they're doing is they're giving cover to real racists as you point out you know real racists they speak at his funeral and they applaud him and all the rest of this stuff. But they also give a free pass to people

because they keep crying wolf about this thing. And kill cops and the killer cops. They don't care. They're fine with that. And look at the horrible things that have done. And now Sam and I are getting very, very serious death threats. And Sam just got a real horrible one. And yet no one cares. Sam and I are getting very, very serious death threats. And Sam just got a real horrible one.

And yet no one cares. And yet the SPLC has created such hate environments that these hate groups that are supported by the SPLC attacked and killed a security guard at the family research center in washington dc uh they also attacked the republican congressman while they're playing baseball yeah uh and and but then they nearly killed uh scalise they shot him and they were shooting it up and and all of that was promoted by sblc hate yes. And so these hate groups, this is really ironic and almost comical that these hate groups, IRHR and Anti-Defamation League and SPLC, of course, especially them, CNN, Washington Post, these groups have all been liars, hate groups. And I want to say one of them, Sarah Sidner, interviewed me and lied and lied and lied about me. And that's astonishing that they get to get away with all of this.

And so we challenge them to honest, open debates. We've challenged all these groups to honest, open debates. Let's do it on your show. Let's do it on, let's do it. How about this? We do it in Washington, D. do it on let's do it how about this we do it in Washington D.C at the press club okay oh sorry I had my phone on and and so we're we're wanting to we're one honest open debates will any of them accept

that David have any of them said yes let's go for it yeah no that because they know their lies will not stand up to public scrutiny the honest public scrutiny and another one that went after us is the Walter Walter Cronkite School of Journalism there's something in there too that is Howard and this is an Arizona State University where I live where I pay taxes to and and they did a story on the same thing all about this and and where I quote Martin Luther King they don't give him credit they try to give it to me that I believe that we should all enforce quote unjust laws and does anybody think that law enforcement should be enforcing unjust laws? And we bring that up because Martin Luther King said that we should disobey all unjust laws.

What I bring up is who gets to decide what's unjust? Well, it's every peace officer. It's everyone who's taken an oath. It's anyone and everyone in government that says, this is what the Constitution says, and this is the tyranny that's going on. I'm going to side with the Constitution. And that's what we're required by law to do. The supreme law, the rule of law is all about protecting individual liberty, that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men that is our job as a patrol officer as a detective as a sheriff as a chief of police as a county commissioner as a mayor governor that is our job and that's a juror to make it as a jury officer yeah and as a juror also you know that, that's a key thing.

That's a, you know, we're all supposed to stand against unjust laws. And you point out the civil disobedience was the key of what Martin Luther King was doing, key to what Gandhi did and so forth. The fact that, you know, it's a passive approach. You know, they didn't get violent. Gandhi didn't get violent. Martin Luther King didn't get violent. Gandhi didn't get violent. Martin Luther King didn't get violent. And the sheriffs who are going to stand there and nullify these, disobey these. The sheriffs arrested Martin Luther King.

And we go through that history. We don't do that today. Yeah, that's right. And who's doing it today? Well, we went after Catholics because whoever made some stupid stuff up about them. We go after Amish farmers, the most peaceful people on the face of the planet. But we arrest them anyway. And we destroy their farms anyway because we're the federal government and they have to do what we say.

And this is how dictatorial and Marxist it has become and hateful. And yet then these other groups, these hate watch groups, all join in on the hate. That's right. Yeah, just following orders, you know. And when you talk about the death threats that you're getting and Sam is getting and the government doesn't care anything about that, we've seen this as well with pro-life organizations. You know, they can go in and they can, you know, destroy the property.

They can set fires and vandalize the property. They can threaten people's lives. And the federal government will do nothing at all. But, you know, if you stand outside and you silently protest, they'll come in and arrest you and maybe send you to jail for many, many years under the FACE Act. And it's just, our law enforcement has just gotten so one-sided coming from the federal government. Their approach to all this has become so politicized in terms of what they will prosecute and what they will not prosecute and again uh you're going to be standing there without any um assistance or or support from the fbi or any of these people if people are making death threats against you they frankly don't care they probably encourage it so um yeah it's really

sad that it is and uh of course splc because of some of the things you've mentioned they have lost so much credibility they're still trying to get it back they're trying to be relevant again but 20 attorney generals across the country uh wrote uh and signed a letter saying that splc has no credibility left when you get 20 ag's united in that you pretty much know they got something and the fbi used to use them in their training they don't use them anymore and the things that the sblc puts out is so ridiculous when i was a school teacher i got a intel magazine that came out to all the schools in the country and on the front page it was all about uh the uh prejudice of this it's really stupid honest folks i didn't make this up uh female monthly uh

menstruation yes menstruation was now an article on the front page of the SPLC Intel report that went out to all the schools, because I was teaching school at the time. This happened just five years ago, and I'd love to get another copy of that. And they were saying that was all about hate? They said that's hate? It was all about kind of a hate and prejudice towards female students who have menstruation. They're monthly. And this is, exactly. And we're supposed to take this organization seriously? And so I guess they couldn't find enough to blame all the racists about. And so they came up with a new thing about how girls are mistreated or

whatever, because they have menstruation. You know, I think that's been around quite a while. And I think, you know, we've learned how to deal with that. And I think women know how to deal with that.

So thank you very much, SPLC for bringing that up to us. But it was so asinine and ridiculous. I read it. I literally read it to my female principal. I said, you got to see this that came to the school, you know, because I saw it come to the school. I said, here, I picked it up. And they were flabbergasted as what in the world is this group? And I said, I've had to deal with them for quite a while. Well, I did a report about a decade ago on the SPLC, and I called it Profits of Hate.

They prophesy about it. They see hate everywhere, right? But it's really all about the P-R-O-F-I-T-S. That's how they make their money. They make their money by pointing the finger at everybody. And I told a reporter this just a few weeks ago. Your SPLC wants to use me to scare all the donors into donating more money. And they have lots of money. That's right. This group has hundreds of millions of dollars.

And so with that comes this power that they can put this stuff out everywhere worldwide that Sam and I are dangerous. You're dangerous. And all that we want is for people to obey the rule of law and the constitution. Well, I'm sorry. It's happening to you. That's a dangerous. I'm sorry.

It's happening to you. And again, folks don't let a sheriff Mac stand out there alone. Like a Gary Cooper and high noon, you know, that's, that's the key thing. And, or your sheriff in your area as well. stand out there alone like gary cooper in high noon you know that's that's the key thing uh and or your sheriff in your area as well uh we've seen this type of thing as a sololinsky tactic we go after one person at a time we isolate them and focus everything on them and so right now they're focusing everything on you but um uh stand tall we really do appreciate what you do at cspoa.org thank you so much for joining us.

Sheriff Mac. Thank you, David. It's been a pleasure. Thanks so much. Thank you. And yeah, keep,

keep fighting them. You've got the righteous fight that is happening there. We'll be right back. Folks. Stay with us. Thank you. decoding the mainstream propaganda it's the david knight show all right and uh let me uh respond to some of the comments some of the tips on rock fan guard goldsmith good to see you there guard thank you for the tip he says says, uh, thank you for, uh,

such fact filled presentations, David. And for that great interview yesterday. Thanks also for Tony, for creating David night dot gold. Here's to all of you. And even Tony's pal beans, the brave,

I'm not sure who beans is that his dog or okay. Yeah. And, uh, yes. And again, uh, I didn't get to it today but um when you look at uh

gold is surging and silver is uh you know moving and all the rest of stuff because of this unrest global unrest and economic risks of the war as well as the war uh and um uh when you look at what is happening for example with bitcoin federal government's got over $5 billion worth of Bitcoin. They've had some big busts like Silk Road and some even bigger ones in the last year in 2022. And so they're holding this massive amount, one of the biggest hodlers, as they call it, of cryptocurrency. When you look at that and you look at the fact that they are at war with crypto, this is even said by Sam Altman, the guy who's trying to put out world coin, and he wants to scan your eyeball and give you a couple of world coins in there. Even that guy, the AI guy, the

Mark of the Beast guy that's playing this stuff, he's out there saying, well, I don't like the fact that government is coming after crypto. Well well they're coming after crypto because they want to push cbdc I guess he would like to be the cbc guy but that's the key thing with all of this and it's one of the reasons why when you look at physical gold and silver that you can keep yourself very important and uh you know when you look at what's going on the crypto i'm very concerned that the government if they got five billion dollars and they could easily manipulate that market of course they manipulate the metals market they manipulate the stock market they manipulate there's not anything that's financial including bitcoin that the government is not there to be able to

manipulate but what they want to do is to uh shut you down and make sure that you have to go through their central bank digital currency. That, to me, is the biggest issue. Bigger than inflation and all the rest of this stuff and unrest. On Rumble, NeuroDivergent, thank you very much, NeuroDivergent1. Thank you very much for the tip. He said, God bless you and your family. I'm a long-time listener. Embarrassed to say, first-time contributor.

Well, thank you. I pledge to start putting some money where my principles are. Well, thank you. I appreciate that very much. And on Rumble, conservative thinker. Good to see you there. Thank you for the tip. He says, when is Travis cam coming back?

I don't know, Travis. When is it coming back? I'll have to eventually get some free time and figure out how to get another camera into this mix. Yeah. Travis is going to be gone for a few weeks here. And my other son is going to be taking the helm too. So he's not going to go on camera. My other son, Whistler, doesn't like to do that.

So at least be till after that. But I'd like to get him to do it. He's got a lot of great things to say. And he's very entertaining. I love listening to him. I'm trying to get him to participate more. Usually the lot of great things to say he's very entertaining i love listening to him trying to get him to participate more usually the problem is getting me to be quiet yeah we could just shame him into uh and and he's got a lot of he's he's done some interviews with uh uh jason barker and angry tiger and um uh you know he could uh he could do my job if he wanted to

uh let's talk a little bit about gag orders, because everybody wants to talk about Trump's gag order. And as I pointed out, it's very narrowly defined. You just can't criticize certain people in these courtrooms and everything. He pretends that this is an abrogation of the First Amendment. It is a big issue for his campaign, because this whole part of his campaign is attacking other people. He put it this way, making himself using, always using this to make himself a martyr. She gave a gag order today. Did you hear that on speech?

On speech? No, on you. It was totally unconstitutional what she did. A judge gave a gag order. A judge doesn't like me too much. Her whole life is not liking me. But she gave a gag order. You know what a gag order is? You can't speak badly about your opponent. But this is weaponry all being done because Joe Biden is losing the election and losing very, very badly to all of us in the polls. He's losing badly.

But what they don't understand is that I am willing to go to jail if that's what it takes for our country to win and become a democracy again. Well, maybe that is what it takes. Get him out of there somewhere or the other. No, it's all about him, you notice. He says first, it's shutting down free speech, but he doesn't talk about the principles of free speech

because quite frankly, this isn't about the principles of free speech because quite frankly this isn't about the principles of free speech it's about the fact that the only way that he campaigns is to uh to to put out the juvenile nasty names of his opponents whether they're in court or whether they're his political opponents as i said uh what the judge ought to sentence him to is to force him to participate in the debate. We might be forced to defend his record or talk about policies, but he only wants to talk about himself. And then after all of that happened, he put out a post from Laura Loomer that doxed the attorney general. He wants them to come after him. That's what makes his day. That's what makes him in the polls. It makes him into a martyr, into a victim. People send him money. He is provoking all of this stuff in a big way. Wouldn't it be nice if we had somebody like Pierre

Polyavra, I think is the way he pronounced his name, out of Canada. Somebody who could really shut down these people and then talk about policies right afterwards. Listen to this exchange. If only we had somebody this articulate, this intelligent. On the topic, I mean, in terms of your strategy currently, you're obviously taking the populist pathway. What does that mean? Well, appealing to people's more emotional levels, I would guess. I mean, certainly you tap very strong ideological language quite frequently.

Like what? Left wing, this and that right wing they know I mean it's that that type of biological thing I am already talking about left anyways a lot of really believe in that okay a lot of people would would say that you're simply taking a page out of the Donald Trump like which people would say that well I'm sure a great many Canadians, but... Like who? I don't know who, but...

Well, you're the one who asked the question, so you must know somebody. Okay. I'm sure there's some out there, but anyways, the point of this question is, I mean, why should Canadians trust you with their vote, given, you know, not just the sort of ideological inclination in terms of

taking the page of Donald Trump's book, but also... What are you talking about? What page? What page? Can you give me a page? Give me the page. You keep saying that. In terms of turning things quite dramatically in terms of Trudeau and the left wing and all of this, I mean, you make quite a, you know, it's quite a play that you make on it. So, I'm just wondering. I'm not sure. I mean, you make quite a, you know, it's quite a play that you make on it. So I'm just wondering. I don't know what your question is. Okay, then forget that.

Why should Canadians trust you with their vote? Common sense. Common sense for a change. We're going to make common sense common in this country. We don't have any common sense in the current government. You know, the guy prints $600 billion, in this country. We don't have any common sense in the current government. The guy prints $600 billion, grows our money supply by 32% in three years. That's growing the money eight times faster than the economy. No wonder we have the worst inflation in four decades. I'm going to cap spending, cut waste, so that we can balance the budget and bring down inflation and interest rates.

You'll want to be able to pay your mortgage again. You'll want to be able to afford rent. Then you have to vote for Pierre Polyev, because I'm the only one with a common sense plan that will bring back the buying power of your paycheck. Isn't that great? He owns this guy. Well, people say, what people?

You know, that's one of their favorite tactics. What people? Well, you're this or you're that. What do you mean by that label? He can't define any of this guy. Well, people say, what people? That's one of their favorite tactics. What people? Well, you're this or you're that. What do you mean by that label? He can't define any of this stuff. And so he lets the guy make a complete fool out of himself. He comes back and he talks about Justin Trudeau spending money without limits, as Trump did. Trump's not going to be able to make that argument. He says, you want to be able to afford your mortgage? Yeah, I'm the one that's going to do that for you. Wouldn't it be nice if we had somebody who could do that?

You know, make sense, comment again. He even almost said exactly my slogan. I mean, it's making sense, comment again. Thank you for joining us. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me.

I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.