The David Knight Show - 1Dec22 Mind Control: Brain Hacks, Bossware, and Schools

Episode Date: December 1, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESChina’s “zero covid” policy is FINALLY faltering says NPR as they outlet pretend it worked in China3:07Stoking unrest? Chinese leader who took power after the failure of Tiananmen Square dies at age 96 — another reminder to the Chinese people of better times and the authoritarian failure of Xi12:37Lock-out: Major homeless encampments in prosperous Guangzhou20:10China is also an example of the corruption that accompanies authoritarianism and secularism. So how do we combat it?23:23Pressure is building on the Pentagon to track the weapons they’re sending to Ukraine. Imagine that.34:55Peace proposal that would work: Get USA out of NATO40:27Ukrainian war shows no sign of ending in the foreseeable future. But what will GOP majority in House do about it? 45:51Elon Musk lays out the big picture for where he wants to go with Brain-Computer Interfaces in his Neuralink presentation49:08Musk says, "We are all already cyborgs in a way in that your phone and your computer are extensions of yourself."59:19The Military Industrial Complex and the CIA's obsession with mind control since the mid-20th century has now exploded with a tsunami of cash56:49Elon Musk says he will put a chip in a human brain in 6 months. Maybe the volunteers should look at this data about what happened to monkeys1:01:07Bossware: A new category of apps for companies to get inside the mind of employees1:07:19Physicist lays out a theory about how he could determine if we’re living in a simulation and is looking for crowdfunding1:13:39Democrat-run House votes to push a labor deal down the throats of the railroad union. The political price to be paid1:18:54Disney’s “core values” on display in new series1:22:47Tony Arterburn, WiseWolf.gold, joins. State of the economy, markets, metals, and the coming CBDC. Netherlands makes an "offer farmers can't refuse" to shut down thousands of farms1:58:58Everyone had a theory of what PEOPLE were doing to cause Arctic sea ice to disappear. But now that it has roared back quickly — silence. No has any theories about that but it IS clear that there's NO CORRELATION to CO2.2:11:30What’s happening on Fiji is man-made as the island turns green2:20:14California is going to mandate that all new trucks be zero-emission by 2024 — just about a year. Nevermind that there no EV trucks to replace the banned diesel trucks, no charging infrastructure, and no extra capacity on the electric grid2:27:19Germany to put a windfall tax on SOLAR and WIND. It's NOT about the emissions2:30:37The root cause of social decline is being ignored by Conservatives because it requires radical (from the root up) change2:37:57New South Wales Supreme Court case: More fines from public health order breaches in New South Wales can now be found invalid. But it's not the kind of win needed2:44:40Covid-19 "hospitalization rates" are not what you think. And in Oregon they were so absurdly inflated that it's triggered an investigation 2:53:12If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail:         David Knight         POB 994         Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters.

Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate. The IT solutions people. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 1st of December, year of our Lord 2022, day 994 of the emergency. And as everybody is going back and forth in this war over what Musk is going to do about Twitter, as he has now become the great hope of the conservatives,

replacing, I would say, perhaps even Donald Trump himself, As he has now become the great hope of the conservatives. Replacing, I would say, perhaps even Donald Trump himself. Putting himself in that position. We're going to take a look today at what he's doing with Neuralink. Let's take a look at what this guy's real agenda is. And we're also going to take a look at the agenda for war. Some amazing things are being discussed as one person on the hill says perhaps the way we have peace is for us to do something that was very unexpected to see anybody on the hill suggest. And we'll also begin by taking a look at what is going on in China

as a former premier there, president, whatever they want to call him, at 96 years old, died. The guy who took over after Tiananmen Square. We'll start with that. Stay with us. Well, we have, things are not really getting any better in China. As a matter of fact, the fighting is still going on in the streets. Take a look at this video here. The Chinese police are lined up in a phalanx. And these riot police and the things that are happening in cities we've seen this at other times uh through covet protests in some countries but it is looking more and more like

uh ancient roman battle and hand-to-hand combat and look at this as they come in with their shields they have uh transparent plexiglas shields unlike the Romans, but they're still using them in the same way. Look at this. Height, shoulder to shoulder. The front guys have got the shield vertically, and it goes their entire height. And then the guys behind lift their shields up so that you get kind of a roof there to protect people from things being lobbed over there. I mean, this is straight out of the Roman Empire approach. And it is an empire, isn't it?

It's going to be another global empire is what they're trying to do with these COVID measures. NPR, though, is telling us that their zero COVID policy is finally faltering. NPR wants you to believe. NPR apparently is the last news organization on the planet still trying to tell you that lockdown was effective. That's exactly what they're saying. Oh, it worked so well.

They did so much better than we did because they were more authoritarian than any other country, even though we got pretty close to them in most countries. They did so much better, said NPR. It's great to have a situation where we lock everybody down and imprison everybody. For nearly three years now, China has had incredible success, says NPR, at keeping its number of COVID deaths relatively low. It's pretty easy when you're manipulating all the numbers. You believe any numbers coming out of China? I said that back in December of 2019.

I said, I don't believe anything these people are telling you out of China. It's all a lie. You know, China was sending us videos of young people walking the street and suddenly falling down. Now, that didn't happen for real until the Trump shots went around the world. Then people really died like that. But so far, the country has recorded only about 6,000 deaths, says NPR. And that's out of 1.4 billion people.

They locked everybody up for these PCR tests. By comparison, says NPR, the U.S. has recorded more than a million deaths and a population of only 330 million. I don't even know where to start to debunk all the lies inherent in that one sentence from NPR. It's just astounding. Pretending that these things worked, that the lockdown worked, because they can't pretend that the vaccine worked, can they? Oh, but they do later on in the article. China has accomplished this feat with what is known as zero COVID policy, using strict lockdowns and community-wide testing.

Look, both governments are lying to you for political purposes. It's all political. The people in China understand this is political. That's why they're in the streets. That's why they said, we're not going to limit this just to the lockdowns and the testing and the vaccines and all the rest. This has nothing to do with science. It has nothing to do with science. It has nothing to do with medicine.

And I've said for the longest time, when Fauci and CDC officials under both Trump and Biden would say, well, you know, this is the science, the science, science. I said, it's not. The only science involved is political science, Machiavellian political science. Is zero COVID even possible now that we have Omicron, they said. No, you're never going to get to zero COVID as long as you're using PCR tests. They don't have anything to do with Omicron. That's a joke.

What will happen if China reopens and SARS-CoV-2 begins to transmit freely across the country? Here's a look at some of the key queries, they said. They even admit that Omicron's not going to harm you. It's just going to trigger a positive PCR test. So we've got to lock everybody down. Now, why do we have to do this? Again, there is no connection whatsoever from a scientific or medical standpoint to any of these measures and any of the so-called justifications that they have. Earlier this week, the government once again began testing millions of people in Shanghai on a daily basis. They say that after they talk about

how all of a sudden the cases have started to rise. Would it have anything to do with testing people on a daily basis with a test that magnifies whatever they're looking for by a trillion times? Even if the test doesn't give you false positives, that will give you false positives. It's guaranteed to raise the cases if you increase the testing. This is nobody sick, nobody going to hospital, nobody dying, and yet we're not supposed to believe it's a new pandemic and lock everybody down again. NPR goes on to say,

New Zealand ran a successful zero COVID policy for a good couple of years, said one of their experts, David Welch, at the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Did they really? They locked down a city of something like over a million people or something because one person tested positive and wasn't even sick. There's absolutely no sense of perspective from a pragmatic standpoint with these people. And they certainly don't care about individual liberty, the rule of law, human rights, constitutions, any of that

stuff. And that has been heralded everywhere. It's just amazing to me. And I had to talk about this because I just could not believe that even NPR would stoop to this level of idiocracy. But the government may be forced to give up in China the approach of zero COVID in the coming year. I believe if not in the coming weeks or months, says a Chinese health expert that they talked to. He said once people begin to understand the nature of the virus, that it is typically mild. And then they put in, he didn't say this, but NPR put in square brackets when you're fully vaccinated. Are you kidding me? Have they not read the news NPR?

You got, uh, finally they're admitting that more people died, more of the vaccinated, or it's a higher percentage of vaccinated that died. More people vaccinated died than the unvaccinated. And they say, well, you know, that's because we have a higher percentage of people who have been vaccinated. Well, take a look at the ratio of these things. Well, the ratio, if you've got 60% of the deaths being people who are vaccinated, that they say is from COVID, people who died with a COVID test perhaps. But even if all that is true, and you say 60% of the people who died were vaccinated, and they say, yeah, but it's because we've got more people. Okay, you've got 60% of the people vaccinated.

That means that the, you know, the ratio of deaths for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is the same. It means it doesn't protect anybody then, right? There isn't any way that they can spend this information. So NPR just ignores it and lies. And they put in brackets, even when a guy in China says, once people began to understand the nature of this virus, that it's typically mild, they started to question the zero COVID policy. And they put in, once they questioned the nature of the virus, that it's typically mild, when you're fully vaccinated, inserts NPR.

They started to question the zero COVID policy. They had just said earlier in the article that China would not allow any of the really good vaccines done by the U.S. companies, wouldn't allow that stuff, and they had to use the inferior Sinovacs. And yet, they're still saying, even though it's inferior, they're still saying it's protecting people from dying, and they put that in there. He went on to say there have been food shortages. Is that something that NPR should be concerned about? No.

That's why I said at the very beginning. Yeah. Even if this is the worst pandemic and it wasn't even a pandemic, even if it's the worst pandemic you've ever seen, uh, you're going to cripple yourself in terms of being able to respond to it. If you cut off your food supply, if you cut off your economy. So he says they had food shortages. Uh, they lost jobs.

They're cut off from the world. And that doesn't just mean China as a whole individuals had food shortages because they locked them in their rooms, drill a hole in the, in the concrete floor outside their door and put a rod in it so you can't open your door. That's why these people died in that fire. China is preparing for a big surge. They got a surge coming here.

Yeah, they got a surge coming. A surge of anger and blowback and rebellion. But they're saying a big surge in severe COVID cases, says NPR. The government is building more hospitals and ICU beds across the country, and it's ramping up vaccinations amongst the most vulnerable. Same game. China has been the model. You want to talk about models?

It wasn't the Imperial College model. It wasn't any of these things. It wasn't any of these things. It wasn't any computer models. It was the China model of what they're going to do to us. Yeah. They may not be building hospitals. They may be building prisons because that's what these places are. Uh, you know, keep these people locked in a little tiny self, let them not even let them out.

Just feed them, give them some food through a door. Like I showed you yesterday. That is what they're doing. They're ramping up the prisons because they know there's going to be a big surge in rebellion. So, uh, yesterday, China's former president, uh, Jiang Zemin died at the age of 96. It prompted a wave of nostalgia. Yeah. Sick, simpering tyrants, uh, according to Reuters. Well, there is some nostalgia for them because when, uh, he was someone who was was brought in in the aftermath of Tiananmen Square and of course a lot of people are saying this is much bigger than Tiananmen Square because it's not localized in one place that there were some you know pushbacks that in Shanghai and some

other places that led up to Tiananmen Square in Beijing in the capital. But it was pretty much focused in one area. That's why people are saying there's been local protests in the past, a lot of local protests against local government policies, but there hasn't been anything against the Chinese government since Tiananmen Square. And this is much more broadly based geographically, demographically than Tiananmen Square was. Now, what happened after Tiananmen Square? Well, the guy who was the Chinese president, after they got tired of the protests that went on for a long time in the Capitol building, they called out the military. And we've all seen the pictures of Tank Man who was standing in front of the tank

and the tank would move, but they gave the military orders and they just started running people over with tanks, opening up with machine guns. It was a massive slaughter that they still to this day will not admit. But in the aftermath of that, they got rid of the guy who was the Chinese president at the time. And they put in this guy who just died at 96. Zheng Zemin. And he was kind of plucked from obscurity. But they went

through a period of rapid economic growth. He kind of brought in the crony capitalism, fascist economic model that has raised the standard of living significantly in China. When we were there, about 15 years ago, uh, they still lived in what we would consider to be very poor conditions.

However, you know, because we dress down, you know, um, uh, you look at, uh, what they're wearing, it's the same kind of stuff we would go buy at Walmart or something. Right. what they were wearing. It's the same kind of stuff we would go buy at Walmart or something, right? And so, you know, by the time we got there. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back

as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ie looking for reliable it solutions for your business at innovate we are the it solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity,

we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today.

Innovate, the IT solutions people. Fifteen years ago, things had changed significantly. We talked to a lot of people who had adopted from China, and they said, yeah, you know, they're gradually stopping. And we talked to people who had been there, you know, a year or two earlier, five years earlier, whatever. And they were talking about the fact that they were fully dressing the young kids instead of just letting them, you know, go to the bathroom in the streets and not having them wear pants or diapers or anything. But they were starting to dress them like Westerners. And that's what we saw.

And that was a change. And rather than everybody walking around and, um, you know, essentially, uh, pajamas like they, they did under Mal, you know, they, they were wearing regular Western dress and the Walmarts all over the place of Walmarts, unbelievably crowded. However, uh, and there were a ton of cars clogging the roads, but most people did not have cars. You'd still see a lot of people hauling massive amounts of stuff balanced on a bicycle. It's just amazing. But out in the countryside, after you get out of the city, people were living in essentially storage sheds.

What we use for storage sheds, you know, where you've got, um, uh, three concrete walls and you've got a big garage door in the front. And so they had no windows, no doors, just the garage door itself. And so as you drive by, uh, they're in this very small storage shed, just a few hundred square feet. And everything they've got is in there, uh, kind of an L shaped, uh, apartment. And they've got the door open cause they got to L-shaped apartment. And they've got the door open because they've got to have light and ventilation. So they were still very poor, but they had seen a massive increase in their standard of living. And that makes people happy. Even if you're still poor and things are improving significantly and rapidly, that made people happy.

And that was what was happening under this guy who just died. That's why there's nostalgia for that. Now, when we were there 15 years ago, they still had nostalgia for Chairman Mao, who had done the great leap forward, who had murdered who knows how many tens of millions of people. There was nostalgia for that, just like there's nostalgia for Abraham Lincoln in our country,

who did this absolutely unnecessary slaughter for his own political ambition. And that's the way these guys are. But after a war, everybody loves the leader and they portray this. And of course, the government runs propaganda campaigns to the educational system to get people to do that. But they had seen a big increase in the standard of living. But now, of course, there's widespread street protests among residents who are fed up with the heavy-handed COVID-19 curbs. Three years and getting worse. The zero COVID policy is a hallmark of President Xi Jinping,

who recently secured a third leadership term that cements his place as China's most powerful leader since Mao. It's taken China in an increasingly authoritarian direction since replacing the guy that was between this guy who just died at 96 and between him and the current dictator, she, there was who? H.U. You can always remember when we're talking about she, who was on first? She's on second.

I don't know what's coming next next but it may be coming pretty soon because they may be throwing this guy out if this is bigger and you know more widespread geographically and demographically remember tenement square it was students this is uh everybody that they've been locking up and starving. So if this, but you know, she is ruling with an iron hand and it was, if you remember just a couple of weeks ago, uh, as a power play, he knew that the people were already pushing back on this stuff and a lot of different areas. They didn't like what he was doing to them. It's his version of the great leap forward. Everybody out into the fields.

I don't care what's going on. And I don't care if you know anything about agriculture, we're going to have you out there raising food and they starved. But, um, to show his power, he had this guy who, uh, escorted off, showed you the pictures of that. And, uh, he was, you know, what is going on, you know, and he just kind of smiles and looks to the other side. As who tries to pick up his paper, he puts his hand down on the desk. You're not taking that. And these guys, you know, frog marched him out, essentially. They didn't have to literally carry him out because he's an elderly man in his 80s.

But he has done a great deal to show how ruthless he is and his power, but he is doing that to the people that are there. As a matter of fact, if you want to look at what is happening here in Guangzhou, people who are getting locked out or, you know, cannot get back into the apartment, they're living in the streets.

I mean, this is looking like some of the worst areas of California. We never saw anything like this when we were there. And we spent a great deal of time in Guangzhou. Never saw anything at all like that when we were in Guangzhou. So even though Zhang put down student protests in Shanghai that were part of the wave of pro-democracy demonstrations that culminated in Tiananmen Square. Some Chinese expressed nostalgia for his era as a time of optimism as well as hope for economic liberalization and political freedom. Because again, he changed the, you know, created this kind of merger of state and private businesses,

crony capitalism, this authoritarian corruption, if you will, that they were able to raise their standard of living. Associate professor at the School of Public Policy in Singapore said, Jiang Zemin is a legend. Now we are too simple, sometimes naive. As we thought, the regime would march toward openness, transparency, and democracy. But now they're looking at this authoritarian regime, and they're not very happy with it. As I said, they pulled him out of obscurity after the Tiananmen Square.

They kicked out the other guy, put him in, uh, when he retired, uh, he was, as they point out a master politician, he'd surrounded himself with people. It's just as all these guys have to do.

She has done that as well. Uh, they called it the Shanghai game, but eventually who consolidate his grip. And now, uh, she is, and now Xi is there. He was on first. But now they're looking at Xi, and they're not too happy about it. And so Jim Dennison, who's a Christian, writes op-ed pieces on a regular basis.

He talks about the fact that he was brought in, in China, during this wave of prosperity, in reaction to the fact that this guy who just died was president when he went to China. And people requested him to come to China because they said, you know, we've got some real problems here with corruption and other things like that, and we'd like to get you to speak to that. And so he said, when you look at what is happening right now, he said, CNN has verified 23 demonstrations so far across 17 Chinese cities,

including Beijing and the financial center of Shanghai. Yesterday, Chinese universities sent students home. Police fanned out in Beijing and Shanghai to prevent more protests. I showed you the pictures yesterday of the drones dropping who knows what spray on the streets, spray on people who were protesting. The New York Times says the protests are injecting a new element of uncertainty and instability into the global economy. Everybody is going to be affected by this because the globalists have set up China as the center of the global economy. Unrest in China illustrates a simple

but profound fact that ideas change the world. And this is where Jim Denison starts talking about his personal experience. He said when he went there, he said, I experienced this worldview of Marxism, of atheism. Personally, when I visited Beijing some years ago to teach a seminar on business ethics, those who attended wanted me to address the corruption that is so endemic in their system. They recognized that bribes, identity theft, manipulation of market outcomes were poisoning their business environment and undermining their future i mean we talk about the the chinese price right as i said many times the key issues with it are the fact that it's a currency manipulation you know uh piracy

intellectual property theft and slave labor well when we start with a foundation like that, you shouldn't be surprised that it has all kinds of other secondary and tertiary effects that happen. He said the unrest illustrates the simple but profound fact that ideas change the world. He says Xi Jinping's political system is built on Marxist nationalism. That's why people can't get their head around it, you know? Typically, Marxism was international. And in one sense, this is international. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment

so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. Because they're trying to make China the global center of manufacturing and the economic and military power of the world. That's really what they're focused on.

But they're hyper-nationalist. That's why I say fascism really describes what's going on there better than communism. But both Hitler and Stalin identified themselves as socialists. Hitler was a national socialist. Stalin was an international socialist. Their big difference in terms of practical aspects was when they were going to get rid of all private property and when they were going to confiscate and take over the businesses and the tools of production.

But he said the real issue is that of course, Marxism denies the individual and Marxist view. The individual is a means to the advancement of society, which in turn he claimed would eventually benefit the individual. Therefore, the state can impose a zero COVID policy on its citizens, whatever the economic or, uh,

other justifications might be, the consequences. The atheistic system, he said, naively ignores the fallen nature of man. It invests autocratic power in the hands of a single ruler surrounded entirely by loyalists. This is what I was saying. It's what all these guys do. Zheng Zemin came in. He surrounded himself with all his people.

And then who comes in? He gets all of his own people in. It sees people as a means to the end of the state. You will serve the state's purpose. Rather than as divinely created bearers of the image of God. And we see this here in our society as well. the state's purpose, rather than as divinely created bearers of the image of God. And we see this here in our society as well. Look at the educational foundation of where they teach teachers and educational majors.

Educational psychology is required to look at B.F. Skinner when Karen was doing that. Beyond freedom and dignity, treat you like animals, not as something that is unique on earth, a human who is created in the image of God. Deny that dignity. Deny that humanity, and you deny the freedom. And so he said, you know, they brought me in to talk about business ethics

because they didn't have any. It's all bribes and stealing and manipulation. He said their atheistic culture had no objective ethics to stand upon encountering these practices. They had no sense of the value of the individual as opposed to the authority of the state. Why would you expect that there's going to be any ethics in that? Take a look at what is happening in our society.

You know, postmodernism and the most extreme example of that that we've seen so far is transgenderism, denying all reality, denying that there is such a thing as truth, right? This is the ultimate denial of all this. You have a truth, I have a truth. Well, here's my truth. I may look like I'm a male, but I'm really a female. How dare you get in the way of my truth? That is postmodernism taken to the absurd extreme of gender. But all these things that we're looking at are about postmodernism. That's removing objective truth, removing any moral foundation to your society because they're trying to pull the society down.

So really the, you know, when I look at it and the fact that he's talking to these businessmen and I think about what business was like in the middle of the 20th century, when I was a child, my father was in business, his small business. And so he knew a lot of other small businessmen. They were not out there in the kind of ethics that we see now in the big Wall Street companies. And not even, you know, yeah, you had bad corporations back then. But we knew some people who had very,

very successful regional chains and one guy who had a very successful national chain. As a matter of fact, he went to our church. You would never know that he was any different from anybody else. And they were the types of people like these entrepreneurs that have started Chick-fil-A or Hobby Lobby because they were Christian. And that informed their ethics. And they didn't get rich by stealing from people, by deceiving people, by hurting people. And so when you look at that and you think about how things have changed in our country, it is no surprise that things have taken that turn in a country that doesn't acknowledge any moral standards, any foundation for ethics, and that's where we are today, and that's why our country looks the way that it does.

As Jim Denison said, they tried to bypass God. And now we are doing the same thing. And now we are paying the price. Before we go to break, I'll just say, you know, I wrote some lyrics to change the stuff from Scarborough Fair. And I think it really describes what he's talking about here. Are we living in Vanity Fair? Money houses houses the fashions we wear remember christ who warned of their snares he cannot their master at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10

if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business at innovate we are the it solutions people for businesses across ireland from network security to cloud productivity we handle it all installing managing supporting and reporting on your entire it and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today.

Innovate the IT solutions people. Free share. We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show all right and thank you for the tip, Ivan. I appreciate that. He says, very generous. He says, good morning, Mr. Knight. Finally get to catch you live as I'm waiting for my flight.

Have a blessed day. Thanks for all your hard work. And Mrs. Knight as well. Yes, thank you very much. And it's great. Thanks for joining us live. And again, I'll mention to everybody if you could um try to help spread the show i just talked to somebody yesterday we're going to uh start trying to push it out

to some additional outlets uh he has um a way that he can do it uh with software so um you know we've been kind of limited in terms of the amount of time. And we've gotten things up kind of late last couple of days because of health issues and challenges with Travis's wife. But I don't typically talk. Usually we're engaging the people who are on RockFan, but we have a very important base of support at Subscribestar. And this is a prayer request. I'll kind of keep it in general and now, uh, just use some first names here.

Uh, but, um, uh, Jeffrey says, uh, my girlfriend, Angie is having surgery next week to remove a growing fibroid in her

uterus. Can you ask listeners to pray for a successful outcome? Yes, we will. Uh, she's unvaxxed, but she works in a nursing home and this started right after the vaccine mandates. And I often wonder if it has anything to do with vaccine shedding surrounding her there. I wonder as well. I mean, I can't prove

it, but honestly, um, I am suspicious of that when this stuff started uh we had uh friends um who said yeah spent a lot of time um one of our good friends um went to visit her parents who were all vaxxed up and stayed with them helping them for a week or two. And she started having some of these symptoms in terms of bleeding and things like that, very unusual, especially for her age, that you see for people who've been vaccinated. It's anecdotal, can't prove it, but we've heard a lot of stories about that. And the question is, you know, we know that this spike is being transferred in breast milk. It's being transferred to babies at a young age by their mothers who are vaccinated. So it's a real issue. But please pray for Angie who is having surgery, that that goes well and that that would take care of it.

And I just want to say thank you to some of the people who sent us checks in November that we've not mentioned yet. And I'll just do a few of them here and then we'll get the other ones a little bit later. Edward C. Thank you very much. Ronald C. John R. Russell and Sherry E. Paul D. Thank you very much for that. And we'll get to the rest of the people later because there's about another five or six people there as well. So let's talk a little bit about war. The Ukraine war. This is how insane this whole thing is.

Pressure is building on Biden to track the weapons that they're sending. Let's just send over tens of billions of dollars worth of weapons and let's pay no attention to where they're going, right? They said pressure is building for the Biden administration of the Pentagon to actually provide oversight and accounting for the massive military assistance and weaponry sent overseas to Ukraine. Stricter oversight and accounting. Well, I guess maybe they're a little bit shy after the last time people audited the Pentagon. Those people got a missile through the window of their office there at the Pentagon.

At the moment, the defense aid is about to hit the $20 billion mark. Well, you know, we've gone well over $60 billion. Let me ask you, if they are not even bothering to track tens of billions of dollars worth of weapons, what do you think they're doing in terms of tracking the tens of billions of dollars in other kinds of aid? This is an unbelievable black hole of corruption that is going into Ukraine. It's open-ended amounts of taxpayer funds, what it really is. So the House passed, the Democrat-controlled House, passed a version of overlapping reports from the Pentagon and the inspectors general who police transfers of articles of war, plus the establishment of a task force to design and to implement enhanced tracking measures, says the Washington Post. They didn't have this before.

It was like a building nuclear weapons and say, you know, we need to put some checks on that and make sure somebody doesn't just lean on the desk and fire these things, you know? Uh, but that would be accidental. These people have a tremendous incentive to ship this stuff around. You know, I mean, look, if, if it's, we're over $60 billion, well over, if you've got $40 billion, it's just going to general, you know, party stuff, uh, just general infrastructure or supposedly economic aid or whatever. And you got, um, half of that amount, $20 billion, going to military stuff. It's just unthinkable that they don't have any controls on any of this thing. American troops are said to be performing inspections of U.S. weapon caches on the ground. Oh, but very far away from the actual fighting, so we don't get any U.S. troops involved in that.

Yeah, right. All this stuff is a problem. So there's a, a Democrat whose name is Jason Crow, Democrat Congressman from Colorado. And he said, the taxpayers deserve to know that investment is going where it is intended to go.

So I guess as he put that amendment in to the NDAA, will we call that the Eat Crow Amendment? Crow led an effort in the House Armed Services Committee to include in the defense bill instructions to the Defense Department Inspector General to review, audit, investigate, and inspect the Pentagon's efforts to support Ukraine. Yeah, what an interesting idea that we should actually track weapon systems that we're sending by the tens of billions of dollars. And then he says this.

He says, well, you know, they're going to lose some things. We understand that. There's going to be a lot of, you know, just like the clip that's going around viral on social media of some people walking into a California Apple store. And they said, this is how pathetic it's become. You've got all these Apple employees and it's a very crowded store, but you got like, you know, three or four guys coming in. They got hoodies on, they got backpacks and they're just ripping stuff off, you know, phones and all these other things off of the counter to steal them. And, uh, the employees, meanwhile, sorry, I had to sneeze. The employees, meanwhile, are doing nothing other than get away.

And you can see them because they're wearing red shirts and they're, you know, getting between these people and pulling the customers away here, here, take this stuff, leave us alone, that type of thing. That's what it's come to. And so, um, you know, I guess we kind of expect as we see that happening all around us in retail stores and target said, yeah, we've had $400 million in theft. Thanks to these kinds of rules. So I guess we just understand that, you know, things are going to get lost you know these um rpgs and they're just going to sprout wings and fly away and that's to be expected says representative crow we're not trying to prevent every single piece from falling

into the hands of the r, the Russians. That's not what's happening. This stuff, this is corruption. This is going into a black market. It's not to the other side, but we do want to make sure that it's not happening at a large scale. Yeah. Well, maybe you need to think of getting out of this ending. There was actually an op-ed piece on the Hill.

Congress should end the war in Ukraine by withdrawing from NATO. Oh, there's an idea. Remember when Trump floated that idea and everybody, yes, yes, I love Trump. He wants to get us out of NATO. It's long past time for us to get out of NATO. And then, of course, he didn't do it. Just like when he said, i fire fauci yes yes fine yeah okay we'll see that's the way he operates he knows what the people want but he

isn't gonna do it he just throws it out there dangles it like a piece of candy on his you know or carrot in front of the uh at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus

gamblingcare.ee front of the horse and never lets the horse quite get that that's the donald trump approach but yeah um this is an op-ed piece on the hill let's get out of nato why he says well you know congress can end this congress can end this war. Congress could win a Nobel Peace with France by statute. A congressional end to the U.S. participation in NATO would be no constitutional novelty. That's what I've been done once. Why did they do that? Well, because of the Napoleonic Wars.

They didn't want to get drawn in. France had been our ally in defeating the British, and we had a defense treaty with them, but they didn't want us to get drawn into the new war, but eventually we did anyway. And they came in and, you know,

burned down the, um, burned down the Capitol. Uh, but anyway, he says, um, uh,

the very latest, uh, at the very least, right. Uh, NATO, uh, became obsolete in 1991 when it's raised on debt, the Soviet empire dissolved by remaining in NATO and spearheading the expansion to Russia's borders with 30 members. The U S provoked Putin's attack on Ukraine.

It was poised to join NATO to fortify the encirclement of an already diminished Russia. And again, going back three years ago, after the U.S.-led coup in Ukraine, Arestovich, as the Zelensky administration came in, he ran on a policy of, we're going to stop this war where we have been attacking the people of Donbass for five years. We're going to stop that. Everybody says yes. He got a lot of votes from the people that were in that region that was trying to break away, as well as the other people. Everybody wanted peace. Zelensky said, you know, we can have, it's kind of like Trump saying, yeah, we can get out of NATO. Zelensky said, you know, we could have, it's kind of like Trump saying, yeah, we could

get out of NATO. Zelensky said, we could stop this war. And so the interview of Restovich, who was his representative there, and he says, no, the war's not going to end. It's going to get worse in three years. We're going to be a direct war with Russia. But the good thing is, even though it's going to destroy this country, we get into NATO. See, it was always planned.

It was always, guess what? You guys, you'll get into NATO. We got you covered. You're going to have to destroy this country, we get into NATO. See, it was always planned. It was always, guess what? You guys, you'll get into NATO. We got you covered. You're going to have to sacrifice your country, though. And they're willing to do that. By withdrawing from NATO, Congress would end the existential threat that occasioned Putin's invasion of Ukraine and extinguish the executive branch's ambition for regime change

or weakening of Russia. The U.S. is NATO's locomotive, the other members collectively the caboose. Congressional withdrawal would permit Putin to save face if he ended Russia's military and political debacle in Ukraine by asserting that his war aim had been achieved. Russia is a paper tiger, he says. Its military forces have performed miserably in Ukraine. They've been forced to rely on Iran for weapons.

Russia's military spending is a fraction of the collective defense budgets of Europe's NATO members. The European Union's GDP is more than eight times Russia's. The European Union's per capita GDP is more than double Russia's. Russia is no military threat to Europe's NATO members, not even close. The U.S., departing NATO, would not leave them in the lurch. He said, the U.S., however, is on track to spend over $100 billion to support Ukraine in less than a year. The war shows no sign of ending in the foreseeable future, as long as the U.S. remains in NATO.

Diplomacy is a non-starter. Zelensky insists on recapturing all territory occupied by russia the ukraine war will drag on indefinitely until it drags us into a world war and it will drain the u.s of at the very least 100 billion dollars a year but as history has shown when uh they're not winning they always double down they don't ever say you know maybe this is the wrong thing no they will double down it will be far more than 100 billion dollars a year and it will end in a world war i believe that's what the approach is but that would be the way that it could stop will the shift in power by Congress allow them to do that?

It's a pipe dream because the Democrats have the Senate, and so you're not going to get a bill passed out of Congress. It has to be both houses to pass that. So that's not going to happen. And there's no interest in it happening even with a Republican-controlled House. The Republicans, specifically Mike McCaul, said, um no we're not going to cut any aid to ukraine so this is why they do these types of things they start these wars with democrats because they know the republicans will go along with it not even for political partisan gain

will they oppose war they're gung-ho let's have a war. I don't care what the reason is. And that's exactly what Mike McCall is saying. He says, I think majorities on both sides of the aisle support this, and we're going to provide more oversight, transparency, and accountability, but we're not going to just write a blank check, but we're going to keep this thing going, we're going to do war better than they did and then there's the ukrainian people who the zielinski government representative arestovich said yeah we're going to destroy ukraine so that we can get into nato and they're not looking to get rid of nato nobody's getting out of nato everybody wants to get into nato andula von der Leyen the head of the European Commission

had a a moment of truth and they had to pull it out of her speech she said yesterday uh more than 100,000 Ukrainian troops have died in their war with Russia, and 20,000 civilians so far in the war. Well, we don't want to talk about the slaughter, do we, of the Ukrainians? So they pull that from the transcript of a speech on the website. Let's not talk about what is really happening there. So we're going to take a quick break. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham

just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. We'll be right back. 🎵 PIANO PLAYS you're listening to the david knight show Well, last night, it started at 6 p.m. California time. Elon Musk, his company Neuralink, did a presentation that lasted about almost three hours.

So he began by introducing things, and then it got very deeply technical as he had individual people come out and talk about some of the nuts and bolts of what they're doing but elon musk laid out the big picture for people once again of where he wants to go in this uh show and tell us what he called it um what was um what was done last night a monkey, Saki the monkey, typing using his brain. And Elon Musk said that they're going to be putting a chip in a human in six months. Nobody believes that. We've seen this kind of hype from Elon in the past,

especially because there's not any records uh, records that they have, um, started any kinds of trials or preliminary trials for doing this kind of stuff. So, um, if they haven't done any groundwork for this, I mean, they're going to have to get somebody who's pretty suicidal. Yeah. Let's just go for it. Let's not do any preliminary testing. Uh, let's just jump in the, for the full, but maybe they'll find somebody like that. But he talks a lot in this dog and pony show about how we can give sight to blind people. Uh, and we can do all these wonderful things, right? We can give sight to the blind, but his vision is one of God-like powers and living forever because his vision is really not about that you know that's how they will sell it to people if they are successful and they're not the only

company unfortunately there's a lot of companies that are working on this and they've got government grants from the government DARPA has always been about mind control and so has the CIA. There was a $200 million project under Obama that kicked off the BRAIN Initiative. I forget what the acronym was for, but you know, spelled out BRAIN. But here he is laying out his vision of where he wants to go with this, just so that you understand where this guy is coming from. The overarching goal of Neuralink is to create ultimately a whole brain interface. So a generalized input-output device

that in the long term literally could interface with every aspect of your brain. And in the short term can interface with any given aspect of your brain. And in the short term, it can interface with any given section of your brain and solve a tremendous number of things that cause debilitating issues for people. So our long term is... I'll talk a little bit about a long term goal. It's going to sound a little esoteric, but it's the, it was actually the, sort of my

prime motivation, which was, you know, kind of what do we do about AI? Like what do we do about artificial general intelligence? If we have digital super intelligence that's, you know, just much smarter than any human, how do we mitigate that risk? At a species level, how do we mitigate that risk? and then even in a benign scenario where the AI is very very benevolent then how do we even go along for the ride? How do we participate? And the conclusion, the thing that the biggest limitation in going along for the ride and in aligning AI, I think, is the bandwidth. How quickly you can interact with the computer.

So we are all already cyborgs in a way in that your phone and your computer are extensions of yourself. And I'm sure you've found if you leave your phone behind, you end up tapping your pockets. And it's like having missing limb syndrome. Leaving your phone behind is kind of like a missing limb at this point. You're so used to interfacing with it. You're so used to being a de facto cyborg. So what's the limitation on a phone or a laptop?

Limitation is the rate at which you can receive and send information, especially the speed at which you can send information. So if you're interacting with a phone, it's limited by the speed with which you can send information. So if you're interacting with a phone, it's limited by the speed at which you can move your thumbs or the speed at which you can talk into your phone. This is an extremely low data rate. Maybe it's like 10, optimistically 100 bits per second, but a computer can communicate at gigabits, terabits per second. So this is the fundamental limitation

that I think we need to address to mitigate the long-term risk of artificial intelligence. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score

bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Yeah, well, you've heard that story before, right? And he's still telling it. And, you know, you've got to be able, in order for us to survive AI, we have to be able to interact with our computers at a faster rate. And he was kind of struggling with his rate of transferring information to people

as well. Kind of stammering through it. Look, I understand, uh, people have different abilities, different gifts. Uh, speaking is not public speaking is not one of his things. Uh, it's not one of Peter Thiel's things either, but you know, they are very, uh, powerful thinkers in other ways. But the concerning thing about all of this is, and he talks about, oh, look, you're a cyborg already because, you know, if you got this heavy lead weight that you usually

carry around in your pocket and it's not there, it's like, oh, wait a minute, there's something missing here. You get the same thing if you get used to wearing a thick wallet or something, right? Or just having a wallet, period. But the key thing is that the wallet is just a tool. The phone should be just a tool. It turns out that it's a surveillance device and many other things. But let's just assume that it's just a tool that you're using. Let's forget about what its real purpose is. Just like your wallet, you don't want to be controlled by the money that is inside that wallet or the

lack of it. You know, the desire, the love of it. Uh, you don't want that to control you. Well, you don't want the computers to control you either,

or the idea that you must have the computers to complete yourself. And that's what he's selling here. This is a guy out of Silicon Valley. Oh, you got to have the computer to complete yourself. Just like I imagine, you know, the Federal Reserve would say, you know, you get, you're so attached to that money in your wallet. Kind of feels funny if your wallet's not in your pants, you know, you gotta, gotta find

that. Angry Tiger, thank you for the tip. He says, the Musketeer wants you to chip your brain. Yeah. Twitter on the go. Keep your data rates to yourself stop drinking your marijuana bong bong water elon yeah absolutely that's right absolutely but the sad thing is is that it's not just him this is there's a lot of um a lot of

people that are doing this there's universities that are doing it government funding as i said in 2017 for example a research group at stan Stanford University showed two monkeys could type out words and sentences by clicking on letters with a cursor. Little did the monkeys realize that what they were missing in their life was having a computer. I guess they just got jealous watching Hunter Biden. You know, he's got that laptop. I need one of those things. I already like him last year.

Another group of researchers at the university of California, San Francisco used an experimental brain implant to translate a patient's brain signals into words on a screen. So you've got somebody who's paralyzed. Now I can communicate, uh, somebody who's blind. That's what they're looking at. And they spend a lot of time and the presentation last night talking about, well, you know, if we do this and this, uh, we should be able to, um, you know,

have some kind of a video camera that is then going to be able to transmit, uh, through neurons and electrical impulses, these images for people who are blind. There will be some good uses for that. They will focus on that. But understand that these robots that you see dancing around and flipping with Boston Dynamics, they didn't invent them to do that kind of stuff.

And they didn't invent them to help little old ladies cross the street. They didn't even invent them to do the types of things that darpa was doing in that competition after fukushima they said yeah we need to have some robots because we need to have robots that can go through and navigate an obstacle course you know we've got some kind of an accident and a nuclear power plant needs to shut the thing down we don't want to have to send people in who are going to die like they did in fukushima let's have a robot to do that. So show us what you can do. They had the competition.

They had about a dozen different ones. Some of them, they just fell flat on their face, literally. Others were able to navigate the course. And Google bought all the ones that showed any promise at all, including the winner, Boston Dynamics. But this is not about even that. It's not about having robots that can go places where we can't, dangerous environments and things like that. This is about controlling us. It's going to be weaponized. It's going to be RoboCop. It's going to be the rest of this stuff. Everything these people do ultimately devolves into that kind of

control. They said in the past few years, there's been a flurry of research and development by universities and private companies, such as Paradromics and Precision Neuroscience to try to commercialize neural implants and wearable sensors that can decode brain signals and use that data to restore movement, touch, speech, and other complex behaviors.

But that is really not what they are really focused on. They're really focused on control. And do you really want these people to be able to hack into your brain? That has been the goal of the CIA from the very beginning. Remember, I just played a repeat of that interview that I did for the book, uh, Sidney Gottlieb and, um, how the CIA has always searched for ways to control your mind. Well, they're talking about not just controlling your mind, but controlling everything in your body, turning you into a zombie robot. So these corporations, a lot of them now have been,

they've gotten money from DARPA. Some of the people who are running DARPA, former director of the Biological Technologies Office at DARPA, which is Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. These are the people who are doing this, and you should be very concerned about this, because this is about, this is something that is coming for the purpose of war, war with us. This administration has just hired 80,000 more IRS agents, about eight times, I think seven times the number that they have now. They just added seven times more.

It's exploding. So, yeah, many of them are looking at ways that they can intrude into our minds. Working on a film-like sensor that sits on top of the brain and is inserted into a tiny slit in the skull. Well, when we talk about how this is going to be done, then it starts to get a little bit messy, doesn't it? You know, he says, well, we'll put a chip in a human, six months' time. Well, if you look at what they have done in terms of the monkeys that they've had some of the people who are animal rights people physicians committee for responsible medicine has just released as he was coming up

with this show and tell presentation they just released a website that has hundreds of pages of public records talking about the suffering that these animals went through from sloppy experiments. And the reason that this is public is because between 2017 and 2020, they paid university of California Davis about one and a half million dollars in order to be able to use their facilities and other things like that and now these this group of people sued and got the information turned over to them so they could see what was happening in these experiments what they saw were chronic infections

you know from going through penetrating the skull using these probes to implant things, chronic infections, seizures, paralysis, internal bleeding, and declining psychological health before the monkeys were killed. In two separate incidents, the experimenters filled holes in monkeys' skulls with an unapproved adhesive, which seeped through the animals' brains.

In one monkey, the adhesive caused bleeding in her brain. She vomited so much from the resulting side effects that she developed open sores in her esophagus. Well, who knows what they use? Maybe this, you know, run down and get some great stuff or something.

It keeps expanding on her. On the new website, they've got stories in detail of eight monkeys. If your stomach is up for it, it's in graphic detail. When it comes to neural link, Elon Musk is just another modern P modern day. PT Barnum said the director of research advocacy with a physician's committee. He is a showman who makes big promises while hiding the grisly details from the public. And we're pulling back the curtain on him.

Well, again, a lot of showmanship involved with this always with Elon Musk. Uh, I see him as kind of a combination of, uh, Steve jobs and all the fascination that surrounded him and Donald Trump, I think he's a combination of those two things, but the really disturbing thing is his and DARPA's long-term vision of control, surveillance, and Elon Musk's vision for humanity, uh, that is even more frightening than what happened to these monkeys and that is his transhumanist vision and, um, that is a future that leads to surveillance and slavery.

It is a future that has been heavily financed by DARPA and the defense industry. He's already succeeded even if his corporation doesn't do it as we have Washington Post points out. I'm sorry, not Washington Post, Bloomberg, points out that Neuralink has become something of a brain trust, if you will. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie. Of scientists who go there and work there for a while and then go start their own companies or go work for somebody else. So it is kind of a seminary, if you will, for this kind of transhumanism movement and trying to make it happen practically. Seeding several offshoots that are developing different technical approaches to manipulating the brain. And again, why would anyone, unless there's something severely wrong with them ethically and morally, why would they desire to manipulate the brain?

It's not simply about giving sight to the blind. Not at all. That's not what DARPA is about. DARPA is the Defense Department. It's a military industrial complex. Like I said, when they talk about how they are going to, or already are, they say, be able to identify particular memories that are disturbing soldiers that have PTSD. Well, we can delete memories and then we can add in memories of things that you never did, you know, just like total recall. It's going to get very dark. These new companies are built on decades of research and academia in places like DARPA, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research

Projects Agency. We have recently crossed the threshold in our basic science understanding of many areas of neuroscience, enabling us for the first time to translate these innovations into products and services, said a person who has funded a BCI company called Synchron. That's a brain-computer interface. That's what they're talking about, BCI. And again, you know, poisoner in chief, the CIA search for mind control. They've tried all different types of things. They've tried drugs.

They've tried the occult, all these different things. The, the fascination Sydney Gottlieb and the rest of these people have had, uh, since the middle of the 20th century. And now these guys have focused on the, um,

uh, the electrical aspect of this, and they are moving pretty quickly. But yeah, every form of tyranny over the mind of man, that's what Thomas Jefferson has sworn to oppose. And that's what we should be opposing. This is literally a tyranny over the mind of man. It can be done through their propaganda and their careful psychological tech techniques and control. But you know, it was always totalitarianism was always there, but now this, they have the leverage of technology. And so you've got some companies, they've already got a category of software they call bossware.

Bossware. And so the people that you work for can spy on your brain. One company that is already selling their products is called InnerEye. Oh, isn't that nice? An Israeli company that claims that its headsets combine machine learning with the innate power of the human mind, ultimately helping workers to eliminate indecisiveness and work faster than ever before. You know, if you're not able to get your TPS report in, I mean, oh, that's a problem. Yeah, I'd like to talk to you about that.

How about we fire you or you get some of this bossware? Inner Eye. We're going to help employees make quick, almost mindless decisions. Oh, great. Inner Eye's AI turns everyday workers into superhumans. And the company that puts it out, Emotive, just wants to keep workers happy, they said. Oh, that kind of rings a bell, doesn't it? Say, what'd they say? You'll own nothing and you'll be happy. Well, in this particular case,

you will think nothing and you'll be happy. How about that? You own nothing, you think nothing, just a wiped out shell of a zombie for these people. That's how they see us. The dystopian potential, says Emotiv's CEO, the dystopian potential of this technology is not lost on us. So we're very cognizant of choosing partners that want to introduce this technology in a responsible way. They have to have a genuine desire to help and to empower employees. We promise that we won't give this to anybody who has evil motives because, you know, we don't want to turn over this kind of control. Yeah, well, everybody's going to turn into a bore mirror when you give them this kind of control, especially somebody who goes out looking for boss wear.

A growing field of consumer tech committed to offering employee surveillance in a remote work driven world. Yeah, we will again, ready player one. Is that the one that Spielberg did the, yeah, I was,

you know, where you live and work in a little garage, just like I was talking about the people in China 15 years ago. You live in a little garage space. You never get out, but you know, the big world is open to you through virtual reality and you'll be able to work remotely. We've already seen this during the pandemic. They're bragging about, look at this, you know, because we had to lock everybody away from each other. We had to come up with other alternative methods. So we have people who can put on a headset and do VR, and they can remotely stock the shelves without actually physically being there.

Isn't that great? Well, who's going to go into the store? You don't let anybody out of the place. But what that was really about was preparing for a future where you don't have to actually have the people migrate from poor countries. They can just put on a headset and they can stock your convenience store shelves from India. That's what they're looking at. So Emotive, the company that is doing this inner eye thing, told IEEE Spectrum, that's the Institute of Electro-Electronic Engineers, that the data from its EEGs, its electroencephalographs,

belongs to the worker who has to explicitly allow a copy of it to be shared anonymously with higher-ups. Do you want your job? Well, then here, sign this. And, oh, by the way, in the future, we'll just, we got this new terms of service and we'd like for you to just click on this and say, that's okay. And in that, they talk about all the different things that they can do with it,

how they can market it, how they can use it to surveil you for the government and all the rest of these things. That's how that thing works. Look, to say that, yeah, we've got this data, but it remains yours and we're not going to share it with anybody. That ship sailed so long ago. I mean, it was even in the, yes, optional, like the vaccine mandate, says my son. Yeah. Yeah.

You know, we're not going to share unless you choose. I mean, you know, we're not, we're, it's not mandatory. You know, you you you can either share it or you get fired how about that just like the vaccine but um for the longest time you know the supreme court ruled that companies like the telephone company owned your data you know even though you thought that the people that you were calling in the middle of the 20th century with a telephone, even though you thought that was private, they're recording all that stuff.

And if the government came in and said, we would like to see that, they said, okay, here you go. And some people complained about it and said, wait a minute, that's my data. That can't be turned in. And the court, the Supreme Court said, no, that belongs to AT&T. You signed an agreement to work with them. And so that is their data and they can do with it whatever they wish. If you get into this type of thing, that's the way it's going to be.

When they hack into your brain, you know, they've now extended that principle that was established with telephone service. They established that all the data that you have on the internet. They passed through CISA, which used to be CISPA. They took out the P. The P was to protect the companies from being sued for turning over information about you. You know, yeah, it's your data, but if they turn that over,

and, you know, it's supposedly, it's your data, but now the court has said, well, you know, they have access to it, so they can turn it over voluntarily. But there was still that little issue that you could sue them for doing that. So they remove that for the internet with CISA and, uh, they will remove it for this stuff as well. Um, so finally one person says, I don't know that there's any significant interest from employees, but again, this is just going to be like the vaccine mandate. Because it's not going to be, you know, when they start taking the economy down, people are going to be more desperate for jobs.

That's what they're banking on. Physicist from the University of Portsmouth in England has laid out a theory about how he could determine if we are living in a simulation. This is something that just keeps coming back again and again and again. And I find it really strange that as these people are looking at how complicated the body is, how complicated the brain is, how do we, you know, the brain is kind of like a computer, only it's organic and a lot more powerful in many ways.

It's not just the data flow rate. I mean, there's things that the human brain can do that machines can't do, processing a lot of information in ways that machines can't. But it's even beyond that. You know, you have to understand, unless you're an absolute fool, you have to be able to see that there's design everywhere. You can disagree as to whether or not the Creator has spoken to us and how. That's another issue, and there's evidence to support the Bible as being that message. But you have to be an absolute fool to not see that there's intelligent design in everything,

especially in our bodies. And so this guy is a physicist, and he wants to have a crowdfunding of an So to see if we live in a simulation, here's his idea of how he would know that there was some intelligence above and beyond us that had created all this. He said a simulated universe would contain a lot of information bits everywhere. And those bits would represent a code.

He's a physicist. Maybe he doesn't know anything about DNA. I don't know. You know, this DNA is a code. He's a physicist. Maybe he doesn't know anything about DNA. I don't know. You know, this DNA is a code. It's a computer code. And when you look at how complicated everything in our bodies is, but this is a universal code that runs throughout the plant and animal kingdom. That's why they can create these bizarre hybrids going beyond

different kinds of animals, even grafting in things from plants into animals, certain characteristics. That tells you that it's a common designer. I think it's interesting, and I said many times it was one of the real benefits we had in terms of homeschooling was to be able to go back and actually study biology from a non-evolutionary standpoint, from a standpoint of intelligent design. Everything just goes from a drab grayscale to color. It's amazing when you start looking at the uniqueness of all of the different animals. And when you look at it from that approach, you look at it from the standpoint of God designing it. You know, when I took biology, the common thing that they all looked at from an evolutionary standpoint was backbones or the lack of backbones.

You got two big divisions were vertebrate and invertebrate. And then how did this skeleton evolve into that other skeleton, even though we don't have any transitional species, we've got all these missing links everywhere. It was just stupid, but it was boring. It was intellectually boring. And rather than the skeletons and the backbones and the external form being a thread of connection between all these things, if you go back and you look at it from the standpoint of an intelligence and a computer code like the dna that unites not only all kinds of animals but it unites the plants as well then i think it gets very interesting but uh at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10

if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. ¶¶ Субтитры создавал DimaTorzok And now, The David Knight Show. We're going to be joined by Tony Arterman in about 10 minutes. But before Tony comes on, I going to talk about some general news. We've had the Democrat-run House has voted to push a labor deal down the throats of the railroad union people, and they're not very happy about this.

They see this as betrayal. They were angry about the fact they thought they had some leverage because they were going to go on strike just before the election. But the Biden administration said, no, we're gonna, uh,

you know, get together and we'll have the heads of the unions and who knows, uh, what, you know, they, what kind of deals they cut with the heads of the unions. And,

uh, yeah, we'll say that we have a, a general agreement for this thing. And, uh, when they came back, the people who were in the union said, well, look, we don't have time to get this passed into a vote. But even if we voted this thing down, there's still a 30-day cooling off period after that happens. And so there's no way that we can bring this thing to a head before the election. And so a lot of people are saying, well, you know, you've got a third of the freight that runs in the country that is at risk in all of this. And so it's going to be a massive impact on the economy. the Democrats came back in and of course they can force a arbitration,

binding arbitration on the parties. Pelosi said in a letter to her colleagues last night, the Democrats have stood with quote, hardworking railroaders and their fight against greedy railroad corporations for fair wages, benefits, and working conditions, quote unquote. However, she said, we must act to prevent a catastrophic strike that would touch the lives of nearly every family, erasing hundreds of thousands of jobs, including union jobs,

keeping food and medicine off the shelves, and stopping small businesses from getting their goods to market. Quite frankly, it is surprising that, um, that they would betray the base, but the catastrophic effect of this happening right now is something that it would have destroyed the Democrat party if they didn't do it. Nevertheless, the, um, people who are in the union, one guy who's a locomotive engineer spoke out and said it was a blatant betrayal,

but he wasn't surprised. He said, I thought it was kind of laughable that anyone would think that either Democrats or Republicans actually cared. Bottom line, they care about money. Uh, so there was always hope in the back of my mind that maybe somebody would do

something that was actually right for America worker once instead of just what's right for corporate America. Well, the reality is, is that they're doing this for money as well, but yeah, it is going to be something that is going to be a sticking point between the Democrats are paying a political price for it.

That's the point. That's why zero hedge has this just because Congress has the authority imposed a heavy handed solution does not mean that we should. This is Marco Rubio, who has now reinvented himself as a defender of workers' rights. I think that rings a little bit hollow when you look at the types of things that Rubio has done to demand censorship, for example. You want to talk about rights?

Is this a guy who's interested in individual rights? I mean, it doesn't cost anybody anything to allow free speech, but he's somebody out there that's part of the control group trying to control everything that we have. A rail worker stoppage, though, could have happened as soon as December 9th, but that has been um that will not derail the economy now they have they're not going to keep it on track uh bob eiger as a babble and b points out is now back at disney uh replacing bob chapik who was fighting with DeSantis and doubled down on all this stuff and said,

no, we're going to push this kind of content to very young kids. He has now vowed, according to the Babylon Bee, to cut back to only seven LGBT characters in every kid's movie. This is a significant change, of course, from our previous policy of introducing a minimum of three dozen gay or trans characters per project, he said. a significant change, of course, from our previous policy of introducing a minimum of three dozen gay or trans characters per project, he said. We will continue to press forward with our crusade to make every character queer. We'll just do it at a slower pace.

Insiders report indicate that the company will proceed with its upcoming animated film, The Lion Queen, in which Simba rules the animal kingdom while wearing makeup, false eyelashes, and feather boas. Well, maybe they just put him in charge of nuclear waste for the Biden administration. I don't know. Conversely, Disney is said to be temporarily shelving Marvel's X-Men, and they spell that E-X, you know, former men, a reboot of the superhero team featuring a cast made up entirely of post-op gender reassignment patients, pushing alternative lifestyles and

female dominance over men will continue to be a core principle across all of our intellectual properties said Disney's chief woke agenda person. I'm a former dude. I am a, uh, yeah, there was actually, when we lived in Houston, there was actually, um, somebody who was very wealthy and, and, um, had donated some stuff and her name was, I'm a hog. I am a H O G E H O G G rather. Uh, so this is, I'm a former dude, E H O G G rather. Uh, so this is, I'm a former dude, uh, putting all this stuff in his front of as many children as is still possible. Well, you think that's a satire?

Do you think that's over the top? It is so close to reality that it is frightening because uh john nolte at breitbart who writes on a film and i'm glad that he's back on film and he's shut up about vaccines because he's totally clueless about what was going on with the pandemic and vaccines but he's he knows what's going on with the movies says a queerness is quote the core of dis Disney Plus' Willow series. You see? There are core values. As Babylon Bee said, that's what their core values are.

So Disney Plus has now turned that kids' movie Willow that was a mess in the first place, they've now turned that into a series. They're going back. They just don't have anything to say anymore. They used to, they, they went through a period where, um,

you know, because of the video store, uh, ability, they started doing new animated films. They went through a period of doing that in late eighties and, and mid nineties. And then it all stopped.

And, uh, once they started putting the video stores out of business, they stopped making these new animated films and stuff. And so they, uh, then decided that they would go back and do live action versions of all of these things, right. Or go back and do versions where they feature the villains and give us their backstories and do it from their perspective. And, um, now Disney plus is going back and taking movies that they did one after like the Santa Claus with Tim Allen, they did like two or three of those things.

They made like, you know, told they ran the concept into the ground with sequels. Now they're going to go back and grab those things and make a series out of them. And that's what they're doing with Willow. So, um, it's aimed at kids, but they have queer romance front and center. That's a quote from them. And so John Nolte says, is there a difference between gay and queer? He says, well, I'm not going to Google that.

Don't want to know if there is. So in this article, he has an excerpt from an interview with publication Polygon. And they talked to the writer of the series, Jonathan, uh, Kasdan polygon asks, uh, how did a queer relationship come to be the core of the show? How, when did it enter the process? And was there any pushback, you know, from Disney? Jonathan Kasdan says there was no pushback.

Well, I bet they were pushing him forward. As a matter of fact, I know a filmmaker, uh, in Texas. And he said, you can't get anything green lighted with any of the studios, not just Disney, any of the studios, unless you got some LGBT angle in it. You gotta have that. It's gotta be there. So there was no pushback. He says, what's interesting is, and I hope and believe that we're at a moment where you're going to see a paradigm shift.

Yeah, I think we've seen several of those. We've seen so many paradigm shifts. It's become like a, you know, a dance. Hopefully the way that that's going to happen is that these kinds of queer stories, particularly like this one, that were just organic to the narrative we were telling, find their way in. And it becomes less of a surprising and unusual thing to see. So it was organic to Willow? I never realized that. No, I don't think it was. Disney did not push back when the core of a Disney streaming series aimed at kids turned gay. So that's Disney, or maybe we just start calling it, uh, this gay thing, right?

It's not a Disney movie. It's this gay movie. That was kind of like Disney. Um, so we got, um, Tony who is ready to join us. We're going to stop it there and we'll pick up on. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back

as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. General news when we come back. Stay with us. We will be right back in just a moment. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist

future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknight.gold to take you to his website and let him know that we sent you. And so he helps the show quite a bit. Tony has been a big help to the show. How are you doing today? Tony? I'm doing fantastic. David.

It's good to see you again, by the way, I've got my David Knight mug and I'm on the David Knight show. Leveled up somehow in life. And I've got mine as well. How about that? These things are getting all over the place. There must be some kind of a Black Friday sale or something. What do you think about what we saw this last week with Black Friday? What does that tell us?

It wasn't the Babylon Bee that took, that was like, we just took prices back before, you know, Joe Biden became president. Yeah. It's funny how they hide those hide the inflation and sales now. But yeah, it was pretty much a flop. And you see this latest move by the Fed, and people are really excited, like Jim Cramer. That's the first place I look, and I want to see what I should feel about this economic condition.

I go to Jim Cramer, and he's really excited. You should get into these stocks, and this is really a good move. And the Fed is very hawkish, they say, you know, I'm not sure what this move by Powell means, David. I mean, they they took it from we're going to go to to a projected 50 basis points instead of 75. So into the economy and I guess somebody looking for a silver lining, that's great news. And he's not as hawkish. But I will remind the federal reserve first and foremost will save the dollar it doesn't the economy is secondary it will save the supremacy of the dollar first i saw a uh an article on zero hedge about the imf chief said that they owe it to the world to raise interest rates and i thought how altruistic you banksters always have been to

mankind you're always looking out for us the people you know we owe it to the world to raise interest rates because they're look they see you know fiat currencies um you know in terminal decline i mean they're gonna have to this is why you hear the term great reset right we know this and this is again this is leading to problem reaction solution. Um, and all the, all the economics aside, David, this is all leading to CBDC. I cannot stress that enough. This is what all this is a sideshow, you know, gold's up today. I'm glad if you bought gold from me yesterday, guess what?

You did well. Uh, I bought compared to, compared the imaginary uh standard of a fiat currency right just an imaginary benchmark yeah right and we're always watching the numbers and uh things are up things are down and yeah you can make i was on a financial show a couple of days ago talking about that and some people are really good at the paper markets but i'm kind of like there's an article out robert kiyosaki of rich dad Poor Dad fame. He said, God have mercy on us all. He has biggest crash in history coming. I happen to agree with people like that more than I'm going to look at the mainstream because I'm betting against, I'm betting against the culture. I'm betting against the economy. I'm betting against the

financial elite. Well, and none of this stuff makes any sense. And look at what they're doing just with SBF, you know, how they are covering for him and allowing him to say, yeah, there wasn't any, I didn't mean to do anything bad. It's just, you know, some things that just happened to us. It was out of our control. We had no control over it. There was no fraud involved. And then, oh, really? Oh, okay.

I mean, they're going to cover for him just like they cover for the Fed. The Fed, everybody looks at SBF and talks about fraud. Nobody typically other than people like you and I will talk about the fraud of the Fed, but nobody else really talks about how at its very nature, it is a Ponzi scheme, fraud and all the rest of this stuff, but worse than, uh, what's going on with, um, uh, SBF company. But, uh, yeah, it's, it's, they're just so altruistic and, um, and when all this stuff blows up, uh, they will all act just like, um, Sam Bankman fried and, uh, they will all say we had no idea just as they have done with all the pandemic stuff. Well, you know, mistakes were made.

We need to have amnesty. It was a complicated situation. We just didn't, we did the best we could. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is Total Betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Well, yeah, there's an article up on Zero Hedge that says, you that says the banking elites are using the crypto crash to usher in CBDC. I mean, you and I can see this a mile away. And the Sam Bankman frides of the world, I mean, it always reminds me of the late, great Jim Mars. He made a joke about George W. Bush. He said, down in Texas, we have a thing called a post turtle. And that's when you're driving down the road and you look on a fence post and there's a turtle on it. you think well i can see that the turtle's up there but who put him there he didn't get there himself he's talking about george w bush that's what i think about mr fried is uh somebody put him where he is yeah and to take this this is again this is

orchestrated yes um you know that i talk about crypto all the time uh i'm a fan of like privacy coins and things like pirate chain and monero i don't I don't know how I change trading right now. But Bitcoin, I've been in Bitcoin since 2016. I'm not an evangelist. I do think Bitcoin in and of itself is is something very different than what we're seeing in this crypto crash with all these other things in the periphery, all the things that spread out from it. I don't know how it's going to weather these storms, but again, crypto has a lot of promise to it, and they need to get people, I think what we've talked about before too, is getting people to adopt it, using the blockchain, using wallets, and then usher in a crash, bring in the CBDC, and say, look, you need CBDC to protect you from the free market. Yeah, I agree. Uh, but of course, you know, the, the, the one hope that was there

was what happened in Nigeria when, um, you know, they, they introduced the CBDC and as people, they start explaining to people how it worked. They said, oh, okay. Uh, so that's how the crypto stuff works, but I think I'll get this Bitcoin over here instead of your fiat currency They said, oh, okay. So that's how the crypto stuff works. But I think I'll get this Bitcoin over here instead of your fiat currency. And so it actually increased the popularity and the use of Bitcoin. So they shut the thing down. And I said, it's going to be something that is going to be done by force to us. It's going to be, as you pointed out, some kind of a crisis that is manufactured, but it's going to be done by coercion. Because when people have a choice, if there's anything else out there,

they're going to use that other than CBDC. I think everybody is aware. Well, I did have somebody want to put something up about CBDC. I said this last week on Twitter. I said CBDC is to, uh, money. Um, what, um, you have, uh, you know, social media, social media is to free speech. Right. And so some guy says, um, well, uh, what is CBDC?

It's like, no, you know, this guy doesn't know what CBD, cause he, he's somebody who followed me. It's like, how in the world could he miss that? Maybe I'm so heavily shadow banned. He's never seen any of the stuff that I've done. But, you know, there are some people out there who don't know what CBDC is. What I find amazing is that all of our politicians, whether they're Democrat or Republican, they seem to not know what CBDC is, right? You ever hear them talk about it?

They never talk about it. None of the senators or congressmen, even from the Republican Party, none of them hear them talk about it? They never talk about it. None of the senators or congressmen, even from the Republican Party, none of them want to talk about it. They're all on board with this stuff. And that's the thing that's really scary because they do know what this is and they won't talk about it. That's a big concern. That's an interesting point too, because I've seen several articles where they say lawmakers are asking the fed to develop the cbdc to compete with china i've seen this in writing but they're not named which is interesting you wouldn't want to put your name on that uh somebody will soon yeah uh but uh that i think

that's that is in the in the in the making well you know when you look at we're coming up to the anniversary of uh the creation of the federal reserve you know, when you look at, we're coming up to the anniversary of the creation of the Federal Reserve, you know, just before Christmas when a lot of them had gone on vacation. You had opposition to that at that point in time. And so they had to do a sleight of hand by, you know, hey, let's stealthily run this thing in when everybody's left. But I don't think, you know, there is any opposition to this stuff this time around. That's how corrupt Washington is.

I think all these guys are in on it. They're fine with it. We just had an election. And because the media is so controlled that in all these debates for Congress and for Senate and everything else, nobody ever asked a question about CBDC. Wouldn't put these guys on a spot they didn't have to talk about. So it's this vast conspiracy between the media running the debates and these candidates and both parties. Nobody wants to talk about it. That's one of the biggest things that is a warning

flag to me. And I think it's, I don't know, I'm looking at, I think they're going to make some moves this next year in one way or the other. I think it'll be, you know, at first it's going to be gradual, try to get people accustomed to it, and then they will pull the rug out from under us. I think that's what's going to happen. But I think that we'll see some of the stuff introduced this next year, simply because Biden is moving so rapidly, going from this order to every branch of government and saying, within six months, I want to report from all of you about these different aspects of how you're going to do this, redesign the system, how you're going to enforce it,

how you're going to market it and all the rest of this stuff. And, and so the reports came in and already they've got, uh, they're working on a pilot project, uh, you know, that they're going to report on that at the beginning of the year. So I think they're going to roll something out quicker than we would like to see it roll out. Well, I agree with you and never let a good crisis go to waste. And something that the writer Gore Vidal said,

it's not so much a conspiracy. They just all think the same. You know, you look at the two parties and they all agree on World War III. You know, they agree on that. They agree on debasing the dollar. They agree on endless spending. And of course, you know, government overreach,

whatever it is, they agree on that. And something you said earlier in the week that we need more attention paid to groups that lobby. We need to pay more attention to that and less to the politicians or the parties themselves. I mean, I don't see any grassroots real organizations forming yet to stand up against central bank digital currency i think it's going to happen on the local and state level uh it's not going to happen to fit you again they agree on it uh and that's it's going to emanate from washington so we've got to we've got to resist it uh on the local level and inform coalitions and groups and grassroots to stand up against and we got to get the message out There's people that don't know what that is still. It's the biggest story, aside from the geopolitical turmoil we're having

and possible war in this time. I agree. Yeah, I think I said that in the context of abortion. I said, look, the Republicans took a slacking on the issue of abortion. Why is that? That should be one of the easiest things to sell. Everybody is viscerally affected if you see the abuse of a child. And at this point in time, people have not been hardened to that. We've been hardened and we've gotten jaded about all kinds of violence and murders. We see people being shot left and right on TV for the longest time, all of our life,

right? We've been seeing that. But we don't see a baby ripped apart like that animated film, The Procedure. If people were to understand what's really going on, if we got them while their hearts are still tender, and if we were to show people, here is a living baby. And then even with just 4D ultrasound, show the babies in detail and moving. And the babies in detail and moving is done much better. I remember a few years ago with National Geographic, they had all of these baby animals before they were born.

So they had dogs just before they were born. They had a dolphin. They had an elephant. And you could see the hair on these animals, that kind of detail, very detailed. It wasn't the kind of blurry stuff that you see with a lot of the moving ultrasound things. But you don't see those types of pictures with humans. They would hide that from people for the humans. If we focused on an issue like that, and we have to show with that kind of clarity, what is going to happen with a CBDC?

What is life going to be like with that? It's an educational issue right now because people either don't understand it or don't understand fully how enslaving this is going to be. But we do have to organize. I think you're right. I think it's going to be at the local level that people are going to have to organize against this because it's just too monolithic and too far gone at the federal level. There's no solution there. These people are all on the same page. Both parties are on the same page.

We're going to organize issue by issue and do it more locally on all these things. Well, I agree. The politicians aren't going to save us. As a matter of fact, something I think of all the time is there had to have been at least one politician in Sodom and Gomororrah who was like i gotta triangulate my my message i just gotta you know like just making sure i can't be too bold you know but i got i think there's they're always triangulating always using the art of lying and we never get anywhere always arrive at the same place uh but grassroots can make a difference information makes it your show makes a difference what you do makes a difference.

And again, hearts and mind, it does, it reaches a lot of people. Um, and again, we're, we're not, uh, you're talking about Sodom and Gomorrah, uh, people who are trying to follow God. I think it really is. The Bible teaches very clearly that that can stay the hand of judgment to some degree. And, you know, that was one of the aspects of that story. Abraham saying, you know, hey, if we, you know, bargaining with God, getting all the way down to 10, as some people point out, well, that would be basically he and his daughters and, you know, the people that they married,

their family, their immediate family. If just that many had done it, you know, maybe that would have spared it. Maybe, what does it take for God to withhold his hand of judgment against an area? And if we don't have any kind of an effect on our family, on our neighbors, if we have absolutely no effect, then that really is one of the lessons that comes, I think, out of sodom and gomorrah the fact that uh abraham uh not abraham lot had had uh no effect whatsoever on his wife on his daughters certainly not on his his uh extended family through his son-in-laws i mean he just had no effect on anybody and look at how disastrous that was not only for the society but for him and his family as well. And that's the key thing.

We have to start with ourselves, but we also have to, like a pebble being dropped in a pond, we have to go out from ourselves and engage those around us in our family or friends or community and that type of thing. And if we don't, that is the lesson of what's going to happen in our society, I think. It's counterintuitive. Yeah. You know, you see things that you want to change, so you go try to change the external. And really, if we wanted to make massive change, we work on the internal in our relationship with God. Yeah.

That's what God wants us to do is work on ourselves. That's right. Because it will affect the people around us. So I totally agree with that. And again, I used to be interested in politics. will affect the people around us um so i i totally agree with that and and again i think that we i used to be interested in politics and now i just study it for the what sun tzu said about uh know your enemy i just studied intel i have no i don't i have i don't have a dog in the fight i didn't vote this last time which is awful i had nothing to vote for i didn't either i didn't either at

that point in time it's like so i'm gonna vote for biden or i'm gonna vote for i know both of these guys i i've watched them for years i know exactly what like, so I'm going to vote for Biden or I'm going to vote for Trump. I know both of these guys. I've watched them for years. I know exactly what they're doing. I'm not going to vote for the guy that locked us down this last time. And I'm not going to vote for the guy that has done everything through his entire career, Biden, to take away individual freedom and who hates the idea of natural rights. He made that very clear in the Clarence Thomas. There wasn't anybody for me to vote for.

I mean, even the Libertarian Party. I knew Joe Jorgensen and she didn't stand up for, she didn't stand against the lockdown. It's like, what in the world? Instead she's, you know, say, Hey, these, these riots in the summer, they're mostly peaceful. It's like, what in the world? There wasn't a choice anywhere for me to vote for. Yeah. Well, it's more effective, I think, to do things like, uh, you've got your, your people in the chat that started the Knights of the Storm with Jason Barker and Tom. Things like, I encourage that. Just get, get out and get a message out, you know, you, cause somebody can hear that and say, wow, I never thought of something that way. And it changes a life. You can change things. One, uh, one show, one article. I mean, writing an article is better than voting, in my opinion. That's right. Yeah. Yeah. It starts with you. And if we don't speak up, nobody else is going to do it. We have to do it from the inside of ourselves. And we have to do it from the bottom up.

Everybody always, we're just talking about the election. What did I say? I talked about the people who are running for president. The real issue was the local races. But I didn't have any real, you know, I wasn't going to be staying in Texas. And, you know, the people that were running for office were people that had locked us down. I didn't have any, you know, they wanted masks on everybody. I didn't have any good choices even there. So, you know, you have to have some kind of a choice.

And that means that you've got to get involved if you're going to get involved at an earlier time. But the real power to change and the mightiest weapons that we have are the ones that come from our relationship with God, the ones that come from the inside. And no matter how bad things get externally or in society, because we're all going to die. I mean, I just talked about this guy who was president of China, you know, over billions of people. And, you know, he's dead now. That's going to be the situation for all of us, no matter how, uh, much influence we wield or, or not. And, uh, so we need that kind of a perspective that gives us a different focal point. And, um, and it gives us a kind of leverage that we don't have. If we're just looking at the moment, that's what secular means it means for a second

and uh our lives only last for a second so we need to take a more long-term view and that's going to really change us and change society if we do that i think i agree with you i mean it's kind of the the root of the message in the christmas carol you know we're coming up on on christmas eve and again you uh talked about the federal reserve and how that all ties in and and it's a wonderful life it really does you have to think about all those messages and it's a good time to reflect on that as we go into 2023 which i think is going to be a lot of turmoil i think there's going to be some uh tumultuous uh market condition uh because what's happening you know in the undercurrents the things that aren't reported a lot, which is, and this is in my wheelhouse, central banks ordering gold, massive levels, breaking,

breaking records. That was that article that came out a couple of weeks ago, David, or three weeks ago about the, um, the mystery buyer that bought 300 tons of gold. I talked about it on your show. Somebody sleuthed it out. It was just the Chinese. Yeah. The golden whale. Right. They're like, somebody's buying 300. Yeah, it's a government. And these governments are buying gold. You look at the amount of the market cap for what gold is, all the gold that's ever been mined, and it's like $10 trillion. I mean, again, and the debts of these countries and central banks is't what the quadrillion is like. So, there's value in precious metals. And I think there's going to be a reset into that. I think there's a devaluation on the horizon. People need to be aware of that. Just do your own research.

Look into how you can protect yourself. I don't give investment advice. I don't know where there's investments. I mean, I pay attention to people that write about investments, but I really don't give investment advice. I don't know where there's investments. I mean, I pay attention to people that write about investments, but I really don't know. Robert Kiyosaki in this article where he says, you know, God have mercy on us all. He said, there's three things. There's gold, silver, and Bitcoin. That's what he's looking at. That's right. I've read articles from him before, you know, three or four months ago.

He's like, actually buy canned tuna because you can't eat gold. Get something that's real. You know, when you talk about the value of the dollar or whatever, and, and, you know, derivatives and all the rest of this stuff, you know, and you pointed out, uh, well, only $10 trillion worth of gold. Well, that just shows how out of balance all of these arbitrary, uh, values that we put on the paper is, you know, that's, um, and so it shows how these things are out of balance. Yeah. He was, he was wrong in terms of, you know, there was a tweet that he had going back to, I think 2020 or something where he was predicting, uh, well, gold is going to be this and silver is going to be this and Bitcoin is going to be this. He missed those windows. But the bottom line is, is that, um, you know, as you've said over and over again, we can't predict the timeframe of what's going to happen, but we do know when there's something that is fraudulent. Uh, I know when, um, all this stuff first broke about SBF and, um, his, his fraudulent company,

uh, Elon Musk made a comment. He said, yeah, uh, when I was looking to put together the investors to buy Twitter, somebody brought this guy in and we, you know, he said he was a fraud. And I saw many people who had passed on deals with him. They knew the guy was a fraud. They didn't know when it was going to go belly up, but they knew it was going to go belly up because the guy was a fraud. And we know that about our economic system and our financial system. We know it's fraudulent and we don't know the timeframe when it's going to happen, but we know that it's going to happen. And so you don't want to be, uh, in that, um, and, you know, holding those types of things that are fraudulent. You just don't, you know, you want to be into something that is real.

Yeah. Don't put too much faith in fake. Everything that stems from fiat currencies created our, our current reality, which is a dystopic nightmare. I mean, you look at, uh, the, the wars that are created over fiat currency, the fake politicians, the fake news, it's all fake. It comes from fake money because there's no accountability. Again, we didn't have inflation in the 19th century.

We had deflation. You had a populist uprising with William Jennings Bryan and free silver. They wanted to try to get the dollar weakened because the gold standard was so strong. It was causing, it was crushing the farmers with their debts. They couldn't get out of them. So again, but then it went to the opposite way in the 20th century, just complete fiat currency. How's that worked out?

I mean, it's not, again, people say, well, Dick Cheney, deficits don't matter. No, they don't at some level until you hit the GDP to debt ratio, which from the 1960s was about 30%, 1970s about 40 it's about 40 percent of debt to gdp well now it's 125 david you can't it's unsustainable everything about our current reality and whether it's governments or economics or i mean the cultural marxism it's all unsustainable

so we the people we have to take i mean our control of our own, we have to take, I mean, our control of our own lives. We have to understand what's around the corner. Be prepared for it. It's not doom and gloom. It's just the, you don't need to have normalcy bias. That's what I always say about, about Kenzie. You know, she's the slayer of normalcy bias. He's a 26 year old Gen Z or who, who, who always, she's like, makes fun of me for having normalcy bias.

She always catches me off guard too. She's like, I don't think that way, Tony. I bought some Bitcoin yesterday to replenish my wallet after I paid some other advertisers in Bitcoin. And she's like, are you buying Bitcoin now? I'm like, no, I'm just replacing what was in my wallet. So we all need to take a step back and look at all this information and realize that so much of it's fake. You find the real. That's right. It was great talking to Kenzie. That's the first time I'd interviewed her. Um, um, and it was, um, not, not last week cause we were off on Thanksgiving the week before last, uh, when I got to talk to her. So yeah, she's, uh, she's very savvy and

you're very fortunate to have her working with you there at wise wolf dot gold what what else is happening there at uh at wise wolf well the the big news is uh wolf pack which i we're growing and i i mean i've got more and more members and uh i'm i'm finding better deals for us to buy into so if you want guaranteed gold and silver delivered to your door now you don't get gold usually until you get like the last package was like the wise wolf package, but it'd be cap it at 500 a month. You can get, you know, it starts at 50 at the lone wolf package goes to 500 at the wise wolf package. There's four different tiers. We send out once a month and I'm loving it. Uh, I've got the infrastructure now. I had to hire, uh, some people to, to help me because it was just, I was going to pack the packages myself and I can't.

I just don't have the time. There's way too many, which I'm very thankful for. That's good. And as we grow, there's going to be, so the way that it works is the more it grows, the better deals everybody gets. So right now when we're having trouble, and thank goodness that I think the prices rising have helped replenish some inventory. It's not like there's a bunch of mining going on and then we're getting a bunch of stuff from the mints. But right now, as far as like locking in trades, going direct with us, we have a little bit better inventory at the trading floor. So we're seeing better results there, but guaranteed

delivery on Wolfpack. So you can go to dav Knight dot gold and there's a tab up there. It says join Wolfpack and you just let us know that you, uh, found us through the David Knight show and we'll be sure and give David credit. A lot of, a lot of David Knight listeners and Wolfpack, but we've got, uh, really great deals coming out on that too. And I'm working on the website. So just stay to every time I come on, I'm going to tell you an update on that because we're, I think it's, it's the future of what we're doing.

That's great. That's a great idea. I remember, you know, we're talking about Christmas time. I remember my mom used to always lay stuff away. She would, you know, uh, they had layaway programs where you could, uh, lock in the price and put the thing there and you give them a little bit of money each month in advance. And there was no interest on it, that type of thing. It was before everybody got so addicted to credit cards and stuff, but she wasn't borrowing money.

She was gradually saving it up. And in a way, that's kind of like a layaway program. You're saving on a regular basis and you're saving into something that is real. And so it's a great program. I really do appreciate you doing that, Tony. I love the things that you're doing there at Wise Wolf and you've been a tremendous help to us. We're talking about It's a Wonderful Life.

And I think one of the key things about that, apart from get past some of the hokey theology that's sprinkled in there about angels and wings and stuff. But still, the fundamental message there is how we don't realize how we affect other people's lives and how we're all interconnected in different ways and little things that people are doing. And I think that's a great message. It's a message for us any time of the year. And certainly you have been a big help to us here in ways that you don't understand. So I really do appreciate that.

Thank you, Tony. Appreciate it. Appreciate you, Dave. All right, that's it for that segment. And we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back, folks, with. Appreciate it. Appreciate you, Dave. All right, that's it for that segment. And we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back, folks, with some climate news. Yeah, actually, things are getting worse in the Netherlands in terms of their attacks on farms. And yet the environment is actually getting quite a bit better.

So we're going to talk about that contradiction when we come back. Stay with us. 1 tbs of butter 1 tbs of sugar 1 tbs of salt 1 tbs of sugar 1 tbs of honey 1 tbs of honey 1 tbs of sugar 1 tbs of honey 1 tbs of sugar

1 tbs of honey 1 tbs of sugar 1 tbs of honey 1 tbs of sugar 1 tbs of honey I love you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. I want to talk about what is happening with the climate, MacGuffin. It is really outrageous the directions that we're moving in, insane the directions that we're moving in. But before we get into that, I just want to thank some of the other people

who have sent us contributions by mail. Heidi W., thank you very much. Ty S., Stacy, and Charles P., thank you very much. Martin K., Dale L., all of you, thank you so much for the contributions that you sent by mail. And a couple of people recently on Cash App, Max B., and Robert H., thank you very much. I wish I could write people back. Personally, we just don't have the time to it.

And we don't even have any way that I can even say thanks. All I can do on Cash App is to just do a heart. That's all that they allow you to do to communicate. But thank you so much for your support. Let's talk about what's going on in the Netherlands. And, of course, the Netherlands, Mark Ruta that's there, he is deeply embedded with Davos. Davos has agreed to make them the test bed, the model, and actually made them a hub for their approach for food.

So he's taken the lead in terms of trying to shut down real food. You know, they were talking about real money. Well, this is about real food as well. Saying we've got to close farms down. And it's logical for them to go after the Netherlands because they have, they're so rich in terms of farmland per capita. It's much better than any of the other countries in the EU. So, of course, they're going to attack that.

Mark Rutte and his minister in charge of stopping nitrogen pollution is someone who has married her her in-laws um and her by marriage are running the biggest food distribution uh shopping uh you know grocery store chain in that country and partnering together to do picnic along with Bill Gates. So they're trying to control food production as well as food distribution. They're working with Davos and all these people to make this happen. So where are they right now? Well, the headline from the Telegraph out of the UK says Netherlands to close up to 3,000 farms in order to comply with EU rules. Now, just stop and think about that.

If we were to go back a few years ago and you saw that headline, it's like, why do you have these rules? And there is no basis for the rules. That's what we're going to be talking about here. There is no base. This is just arbitrary dictatorial power to create austerity and poverty for people and starvation because they have to take down all the developed countries. Whether you're talking about the EU, the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, they've got to

take these countries down for control. So I don't know, maybe if they're going to take these countries down for control so um you know i i don't know maybe if they're going to take all of these uh different farms you know 3 000 farms maybe what are they going to do with the empty farmland well here's an idea you know here's a here's a picture of a graveyard of e-scooters you know those nuisance things that litter all the different things. Look at this. So actually, when you look at this, and you listen to that music, this looks like an army of bots from Star Wars or something. Probably even more dangerous. Can you imagine if just one of those old lithium batteries catches fire? They're stacked closely together. What an amazing fire that will become, because it will happen. You know, they're just going to what an amazing fire that will become because it will happen you know they're just going to take these things out park them in close proximity to each other and let them rot uh that's i think is what's going to happen to that but um yeah we got to

get rid of the farmland and we should be you know getting more of these toxic, dangerous e-bikes. As I pointed out the other day, it's responsible for about 7% or 8% of all the deaths by fire in New York City were from fires that were started by these e-bikes. And they're telling people, don't bring them into the apartment building to charge them. But they're littered all over the street. You have people who are elderly or people who are blind trying to walk down. They're tripping over these things. Everybody is tripping over them. You don't have to be elderly or blind.

They're just everywhere. It's such a nuisance. But these are the types of solutions, quote unquote, that they want to impose on us. But they don't want us to have food, natural food, real food in the farms. So it's going to be compulsory purchases if not enough people voluntarily step up and say, so we're going to shut down 3,000 farms, and we're going to offer you some money. They haven't said what it's going to be yet. But if you don't take the money, you're not going to get a better offer because we've told everybody that we're going to shut down farms. So who's going to buy your farm?

Nobody's going to pay money for something that the government has declared they're going to essentially shut down. That's the same thing that's going on with the oil refineries. We talk about the supply of oil and pumping it out of the ground and how Biden has done so much to restrict that, to restrict the transfer of oil via the Keystone pipeline, but without refineries. It doesn't really matter if you got any oil. And that's what they've made it clear to all the oil companies. The oil company's CEO of Chevron said, well, there's not going to be any more refineries built in America because both parties have decided that they don't want that. So they said, uh, there is no better offer that is coming. So the government, uh, she said, compulsory

purchases will be made with pain in the heart. If necessary, just feel your pain, and we feel so bad for you, destroying your life and stealing everything from you so that we can starve your fellow countrymen. That's the thing that's amazing about this. It's like the farmers are doing what they can to push back against this. We've seen all the protests and that type of thing. I can't understand why everybody is not pushing back on it. Well, I do know it's because of the powerful propaganda,

because the educational system, we'll talk about that in a minute. But when the Telegraph talks about this, they say, well, biodiversity is under threat. Well, it is, but not in the way that they're talking about. Right? Biodiversity is us being able to have farms and things like that. But they say, no, no. The Netherlands needs to reduce its emissions to comply with EU conservation rules.

Why do we need to comply with EU conservation? Why do we need to comply with any of their rules about COVID or anything else? You tell me why you've got these rules. You justify these rules. They don't have to anymore. They just make the rules and say, you got to follow them. It's a rules-based order, right? I got rules and I got orders.

You better follow them. So EU conservation rules and agriculture is responsible for almost half of the nitrogen emitted in the proud farming nation so what as i point out they just busted a people who are smuggling in manure natural manure oh you're using too much fertilizer you can't have that fertilizer and 2019 a ruling by the dutch council of state meant that every new activity that emits nitrogen including farming and building needs a permit it's the perfect mcguffin isn't it you know nitrogen that makes up about 70 of the atmosphere or more i got what the but that's the

bulk of uh it's in the atmosphere uh So we got to eliminate it, right? I have to have control over the air that you exhale. I have to have control over the nitrogen in the air. We're going to shut the world down because of a cold or an influenza virus. They take the most common ubiquitous things and use it as presented as a danger so they can take control of everything. So I said this has prevented the expansion of dairy, pig and poultry farms. This can be harmful for nature when it washes into rivers and seas. And the Chinese, meanwhile, are building all of the refineries that they can.

They're dumping plastic into the ocean. And then the environmentalists say, look at these massive islands of floating plastic. You're going to have to, we're going to have to do something to America and the rest of the world when it's the Chinese that are doing this. But they're building a skyscraper that is going to house pigs. I mean, they're going vertical with that. We can't even get these people to make our transportation go vertical, even as our cities are going vertical. All right.

Food production needs to go vertical. Transportation needs to go vertical. If they're going to concentrate and pack everybody in, the Chinese understand that they're building what they need. They may be authoritarian dictators, but they're not suicidal. We are, on the other hand. So they said there are restrictions without a perspective. This is their pushback, and this is why they're going to lose.

I'm afraid the farmers and everybody are going to lose if they don't push back on the fundamental reality, this alternative reality that they've created. So they make the argument, they say, well, you're creating restrictions without perspective. In other words, you don't have the big picture in mind. This has been the kind of weak response that we had to the pandemic rules. Well, you realize, of course, that when you lock people down, that you're not seeing the bigger picture in terms of what it's doing to food production,

in terms of what it's doing to people psychologically, how it's harming children, all the rest of this stuff. You're not getting the big picture. You know, there are costs associated with lockdown. Well, that's all true, but that's the wrong way to approach it. You have to go more foundational than that. You have to point out to them, you don't have the authority to do this, and there's no reason for you to do this. You have to attack it at the fundamental level on both principle and pragmatic issues.

And they're not doing that. They're saying it is positive that a good voluntary stop scheme is being promised, says one of the farmer organizations. I'm glad that you're going to put this out there voluntarily for people. That's promising. But many people who don't want to do that will have many additional restrictions imposed. I'm sorry. I'm glad that you got some of this stuff voluntary, but I see that you're going to put in some additional restrictions if we don't comply voluntarily. Another person

says the voluntary closure scheme was welcome, but most would not be applied with the threat of compulsory purchases. So they're saying, well, you know, I'll accept your fundamental premise that nitrogen is a problem. And since nitrogen is a problem, then you're now going down this chain of decisions. So we've got to get rid of, we've got to shut the farms down, all the rest of the stuff. Once you accept their fundamental principles, once you give them the ability to exercise new and unrestricted powers, you've lost. These people are trying to negotiate with them over the little things.

They're rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. And while we're talking about the Titanic, let's talk about ice, for example. This is the type of thing that people need to understand. We have to oppose them at the fundamental lie. You know, the fundamental lie about the pandemic. The fundamental lie about vaccines that are safe and effective. Those fundamental lies are where that are safe and effective. Those fundamental lies are where we need to engage them. Not in, yeah, but lockdown's not going to work,

or remdesivir is dangerous, and it's like, no, no, no. You got to go straight to the key thing. Dramatic recovery in global sea ice is confounding the net zero catastrophists. This is coming from dailyskeptic.org out of the UK. Why has the Arctic Sea ice cover roared back so quickly over the last few years? Well, nobody knows. Not one scientist on the planet can tell you. This might be noted, of course, that there was no shortage of explanations when there was a cyclical downturn, right? When the ice was going down, everybody had a theory about it and everybody was talking

to the press and giving everybody their theory about how we were causing that, right? But now that it's boomed back, crickets, nobody's talking about it. Nobody has any explanations for it. They don't want you to see it. They don't want you to hear about it. So ice melting at the polls is still one of the crucial supports for the entire command and control net zero political agenda. Just like the pandemic, there is no science about this. It is all politics for control and surveillance. Since around 1990, people have been talking about how human-emitted carbon dioxide is reducing the amount of Arctic sea ice. When it started dropping very quickly, there was talk that we had passed a tipping point.

Remember that? At which the ice would never recover. However, you had all these predictions that we were going to have ice-free Arctic Ocean everywhere. But despite the impressive recent recovery of ice, and talk about the tipping points is still going on. And it's everywhere. We just had a new documentary series, if you want to call it that.

The people of the Daily Skeptic call it an agitprop, agitation propaganda series. Frozen Planet 2 by David Attenborough, produced by the BBC, made a number of model produced references to the Arctic being free of summer ice now by 2035. Always about 10 years off, right? Why did the Antarctic ice pack, unlike the Arctic pack, why did that start increasing quite rapidly around 2008? Well, nobody knows. But think about what happens.

If you look at this around 2008, you look at the Arctic and the Antarctic, one of them starts going up and the other one goes down. And then why did Antarctic differ from the Arctic by plateauing from 2010 to 2015? But then mirror the Arctic by dropping rapidly and then turn around and start rebounding. Well, nobody knows. So, you know, first you have this discrepancy between the two poles. One of them starts dropping rapidly, then it stays steady state. Then it starts to drop rapidly again, and now it's rebounded.

Anybody got any ideas why that happened? No. Why has global sea ice followed this pattern while CO2 continues to rise in the atmosphere? In other words, these things are going up, they're going down, they're plateauing, they're operating independently of each other. Why is that? If it's CO2 and if it's global, they should all be moving in the same direction, but they're moving independent of each other. Which would make you think that's CO2 and if it's global, they should all be moving in the same direction, but they're moving independent of each other. Which would make you think that since CO2 continues to rise and these things are doing their own thing,

sometimes they go down, sometimes they go up, sometimes they stay the same, maybe there's no correlation, CO2 and what is happening with the ice. That would be the logical conclusion to make. So the author of this one study says, here's the strangest part. Despite the failures of many predictions of an ice-free Arctic, despite the falsified claims that we have passed a tipping point,

despite the fact that the reasons for the curious and unexpected changes in the polar sea ice cannot be explained by anyone, and the changes weren't predicted by anyone. In spite of all those things, climate change scientists still insist that they can tell us what the global temperature will be like in the year 2100. Yeah, these people have no clue. They can't predict the weather a week in advance they can't

predict what retail sales are going to be they they just can't they don't have the models to do any of this stuff geologist professor in plimer an essay recently published by quadrant said there have been six major ice ages each started when there was far more CO2 in the atmosphere than now. Two American geologists recently found that over half of the arctic glaciers and ice caps that exist today did not exist or were smaller 3,400 to 10,000 years ago. So what is going on, right? It looks like it's independent of CO2. It looks like it's independent of human involvement. But political tactics designed to scare entire populations into following an anti-growth, net-zero future paid little attention to such trends.

Global warming ran out of steam a couple of decades ago. And so now what we have is a highway to hell message that's being broadcast incessantly based most soul, almost solely on invented stories about bad or extreme weather to be due to the activities of humans. We saw that in spades this last year. We only had really one or maybe was it two? Did that one ever come ashore in Florida? I don't remember. Hurricanes. I mean, we used to have a lot more than that.

Didn't have a class five hurricane. And yet with the class four hurricane, first one of the season coming in very, very late, it was, everybody was hyping this as if it was somehow unprecedented. And I went back and I said, look, you know, the records that people have been keeping for the last hundred years is one of the lightest years that we had in hurricanes. And yet the media was saying just the opposite, trying to scare everybody about that. So an entire climate industry that is backed by an almost unlimited transfer of wealth. You see, that's the issue here.

It's all about wealth transfer, which is another reason why you should not be trusting Elon Musk. This is a guy, when you look at all that is happening with ESG, when you look at the crony capitalism and the corruption that has evolved around the climate industry, the massive transfers of wealth. How do you think he became the wealthiest man in history because of this climate scam and the massive transfer of wealth involved in that, uh, he's not on our side. I think it's amazing to see how both he and Trump, you know, Trump was somebody who hung out with the Democrats. Trump was a crooked New York businessman who bribed politicians and then wanted to be the person that the bribes were paid to.

It's just that simple. He and his father had grown up and probably the most corrupt of, you know, one of the top three, if not the most corrupt areas of the country made a fortune. What does that tell you? Tells you who's paying politicians off, paying off unions, paying off everybody, right?

And, uh, doing whatever kinds of things he had to do to make that happen. Elon Musk made his money the same way. And then they both invent themselves, reinvent themselves as some kind of all American boy Scouts. We're going to be our salvation to return us to the American system. Uh, be very careful about people who made their fortune by soothing and satisfying politicians.

Uh, eventually going to come out, you know, as these people go to war with Elon Musk and people look at it and they say, well, look at the entire American government, it's government and the European Union have gone to war with Elon Musk over speech stuff. It's like, yeah, they understand he's a threat to them. This is about their Game of Thrones. Don't think that any of them care about you or free speech or human rights. It's all a scam.

It really is. So an entire island is now strangled by choking vines. And futurism.com says, well, thanks, climate change. Well, yeah, the CO2 increasing is greening the earth. And that's a good thing. Makes it easier for us to grow food. But in this particular case, the change on this island is really man-made, and it's made by the government, and it's made by the U.S. government.

Because what they did on Fiji's second largest island, which is now being absolutely overrun by vines, and the Guardian had aerial pictures of it that they didn't put in the Futurism article. But it's all due to an invasive species introduced by U.S. troops during World War II that is choking out competing flora. We've seen this happen over and over again. As a matter of fact, during FDR's administration, they thought it'd be great to bring in kudzu into the South,

and we've all seen the pictures of that, how it grows. Some kudzu can grow a couple of feet in a day. It just covers everything. Well, that's what's happening on this island. Oh, and then you read down here, some of these species that the U.S. military introduced into Fiji Island included kudzu. Back when I was working with the Libertarian Party,

we had a candidate who had a great slogan because Kudzu was such a big problem. He said, government is like Kudzu. You bring it in to solve a problem, and before you know it, it's taken over everything because Kud it was brought in by the government. And the government in Florida, we used to have waterways that were choked with hyacinths. Well, that was a non-native species that was also brought in by the American government to solve a perceived problem that got out of control. We're fighting this infestation around here of these Asian beetles. They were brought in by the U.S. government.

They're not like ladybugs, but, you know, they become a big problem. An invasive species brought in by the government, out of control. And so we see this over and over again. This is the issue. They brought in a non-native species, kudzu and other things like that. And we have, if there is anything beyond that, it's the fact that we have more CO2 in the atmosphere, and that helps things to grow. That's not something they should be concerned about, actually. They said, though, it's a dramatic demonstration of the unexpected consequences of climate change.

Not at all. Not at all. Does it have anything to do with that? As a matter of fact, you know, one of the things, and I mentioned it briefly the other day, if you, you know, you can look at these people like Obama and others who are not just hypocritical in terms of flying around with their private jets all the time. Uh, but, um, uh, or Elon Musk, you know, when there's rocket launches all the time, even a rocket launch, just for fun, shooting a Tesla roadster up in the atmosphere. And you talk about, uh, that was when he was still a darling of the left and nobody complained about that. Uh, all, all claims that he shot a Tesla roadster into space, how much, um, all, you know, he claims that he shot a Tesla Roadster into space. How much, um, uh, you know, greenhouse gases or whatever did he put out for that?

But, uh, it's not just the hypocrisy. It's the fact that they don't believe it. They're, you know, they're buying their mansions right on the ocean front that all of their green websites say are going to be underwater before too long. Uh, but another factor that shows that they don't believe any of this is the fact that they're not doing anything with any alternative, you know, not, when they say that it's all about emissions, well, what do we have left? Okay. If we're going to not be able to burn, uh, oil, coal, gas,

what do we have left to generate power? Well, we've got solar, we, coal, gas. What do we have left to generate power? Well, we've got solar, we've got wind, we've got nuclear. Nuclear will operate constant, steady state. Now, I have problems with nuclear power. That's why I prefer to have things like coal, because I'm concerned about the long-term issue of nuclear. What happens when the plants get really old? And what happens to the waste that has to be kept for a very long time?

Those end-of-life issues are really a big factor that I think really hasn't been properly addressed or factored into the cost of the power. But nevertheless, we took a big lead in the United States in terms of nuclear, and we still have the most number of nuclear plants, 92 of them, but there are some of the oldest ones around. The mean age of nuclear reactor fleets in selected countries is on this chart here. And shows that Switzerland has a mean age of 46 years, Belgium of 42, U.S. of 41,

versus China where the mean age is nine years old because they're building nuclear power plants, they're building coal power plants, they're building every kind of power plant because they want to build their economy. But we don't. And if the plan was not to deprive us of power that would drive the grid and drive everything in our economy, if that was not the plan, they would be moving big time to nuclear. If it was really about emissions, they would be moving to nuclear. But instead, they're moving to these unsustainable types of power that cannot be sustained throughout a 24

hour period, wind and solar. I was just talking about the green vegetation. Green vegetation on Earth has increased by 14% over 30 years, says a major study. The study is called The Greening of the Earth and Its Drivers, published in 2016 by 32 authors from 24 institutions in 8 countries. Hmm, that almost sounds like a scientific consensus, doesn't it? For the people who care about such things. It analyzed satellite data, concluded that there had been roughly a 14% increase in green vegetation over the last 30 years. They said the extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which has added the equivalent of a new continent of green vegetation that is twice the size of mainland United States. I mean, that's amazing.

14% doesn't sound that big, but you put it in the perspective of something, an amount that is twice the size of the continental United States. Notably, this fact is incredibly inconvenient to the World Economic Forum and to global governments. So the human progress has higher yields for farmers. Indeed, the effect is probably added about $3 trillion to farm incomes over the last 30 years. So less land is needed to feed the human population, but it is never mentioned. Don't want to talk about that because that would push back against their narrative.

Thank you, Rhonda. Appreciate the tip. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. So where are they going with all this stuff? Well, again, it's ban this, ban that, shut that down, shut the farms down, shut down fuel, even for the diesel trucks that are essential for everything. California is going to mandate that all new trucks be zero emission vehicles by 2024. Think about that. We're talking about just like next year. I mean, we're almost at 2023. So in about a year, they don't want to have gas or diesel trucks.

They're all going to have to be EVs. Are there any of those out there? No, they don't want to have a gas or diesel trucks. They're all going to have to be EVs. Are there any of those out there? No, they don't care. They don't want you to have any. They saw us talking about what the nuclear power plants, they don't want us to have any mobility, any power,

any fuel, any food banishing every truck of, or, and bus fleet from California roads by 2045. So, yeah, when you look at what are they going to do to make these electric vehicles charged, even if they existed, right, which they don't yet. They're not ready. Musk said, hey, I've got one that went 500 miles.

Well, that was what they were looking at on a single charge. He doesn't talk about a trip where he has to recharge it. But representatives from the trucking and construction industries were livid at a recent hearing in California where over 150 public commenters voiced their opinions ranging from the state's woefully inadequate grid to a general lack of charging capacity to handle a massive shift to zero emission vehicles so quickly. Again, we're talking about 2024, a year away. Most of the electricity, by the way, will have to still be in this short-term frame. It'll still be coming from coal. So if coal is dirty, they haven't solved anything.

But the issue is not about emissions. We cannot accept their fake justification. The infrastructure cannot be established in the time frame given, says the American Trucking Association. We don't have the trucks. We don't have the charging capacity. We don't have the trucks. We don't have the charging capacity. We don't have the charging network to do any of this stuff. We talk,

you're just talking about banning anybody being able to move freight. The construction company CEO said the logistical issues involved with charging electric vehicles will do damage to us. We don't really understand how to charge these vehicles. Those pieces of equipment go home with those men every day. So they'll need to be charged from home. How do you compensate a person for that? But where do you find all the power on the grid for that?

Environmentalists, however, including the Sierra Club, argued in favor of an expedited time frame. Let's go faster. Faster, faster. Maybe they can figure out, writes the Zero Hedge, maybe they can figure out how to solve the massive logistical issues and the economic issues, as well as what to do with all of that lithium when the batteries eventually go bad. Yeah. When it turns into this, when instead of having a massive graveyard, star Wars style of scooters, imagine this instead of a scooter, you got these big trucks, big semi trucks, 18 wheelers.

Yeah. Electric, uh, 18 wheelers. So as they're not building, building, they don't have the infrastructure to do these demands, and they're not building any reliable alternative of anything or allowing us to use anything with emissions. So everything is on solar and wind, right? So they've been subsidizing solar and wind, but now Germany has gotten to the point where they say, well, we're going to put a windfall tax now on solar and wind, but now Germany has gotten to the point where they say, well, we're going

to put a windfall tax now on solar and wind. They've been talking about a windfall tax on companies that are selling quote-unquote fossil fuels. Again, that is a lie sold by the CIA, that lie of peak oil. But now they're going to put a windfall tax on solar and wind. This is another indication that this is not about emissions. This is yet another clear indication that they don't want solutions. They want to shut everything down.

Can't wait for this stuff to come and to naturally evolve organically with a market, with demand, to allow the technology to mature, to phase out other stuff. No, no, no. We're going to stop this. And I don't care if there's anything to replace it or not. Germany is getting ready to table a 130 euro per megawatt hour cap on the earnings of wind, solar, and nuclear generators. It's never been about emissions. It's always been about depriving us of power, electrical power, for example, so they can get political power. Apparently, they hope to spur more supply

by clamping down on the earnings of energy companies. It says there, yeah, that's not the way it works. And yes, even the companies generating power through green means. The new law is scheduled to pass the upper house of the German parliament on the 16th of December and go into effect on the 1st of January. It's going to go very quickly. Everything's got to go quickly. We got to do it now.

Creating this fake sense of emergency. It'll apply for 10 months. It'll be for 10 months. It'll be backdated to the beginning of September this year. Germany joins a growing number of European countries preparing to set their own national caps on earnings, even from renewable energy companies. While the measures are only intended to last for 10 months, the report notes that they could be extended to the end of 2024, as Zero Hedge points green, quote-unquote, energy,

you've got Biden building a huge Gulf oil terminal. And this has got the, there's not a lot of talk about that that's happening in the media because they want to keep this quiet. This is something that the environmentalists don't want to see. But it is something that is going to be used to export this quiet. This is something that the environmentalists don't want to see, but it is something that is going to be used to export our oil. It'll have a 4.8 million barrels of storage capacity. It will add 2 million barrels per day to the U.S. oil export capacity. So it's not going to be used to fill up. They're not going to, it looks like he's not interested in refilling the strategic petroleum

reserve, which he has depleted by it's only been used three times. The biggest use was with Obama. When we had a massive hurricane came through the refinery areas in Louisiana and Texas, but Biden has used it 10 times more than Obama did during that emergency. And he used it just to look good during the election. And they're not going to refill it.

This port to export oil will provide a reliable source of crude oil to us allies in the event of a market disruption. Oh, really? No, that's a geopolitics over us domestic needs. Because our empire doesn't care about America anymore. It's moving beyond that.

It has a bigger perspective that is geopolitical. So how are they doing all this? They're getting away with all of this because of their fear porn, but that is the biggest issue is how this is transforming the younger kids. You stop and think about how the younger kids are being brainwashed about CRT, about censorship, about gender, and about climate fear. All of that. 70% of children between the ages of 7 and 12 are now afraid of climate change. I guess we could just call this the Greta generation. They see that they have no future.

They're scared to death of this. I think these people are more afraid of, you know, an apocalyptic future because of this climate nonsense than we were when there was a very real possibility that there would be a nuclear war. When I was that age, you know, we were looking at the Cuban missile crisis and other things like that. We thought, well, you know, they're going to blow the world up. These kids are like, oh yeah, we don't have any future because we can't stop this. We're beyond the tipping point. You can't even roll it back and look at these people. That's why Greta says, how dare you? You know, you're not even trying to slow this thing down. We've already gone too far.

We're all going to die. And that's what they have relentlessly pushed to children for so long now that 70% of them are afraid of climate change, experiencing high rates of mental health difficulties with one school counselor earlier this year saying that the anxiety rates have hit an all- time high after lockdown. So, you know,

it has been completely effective. It's one of the reasons why I say we have to get our children out and our society out of the clutches of the government, educating them because they're pushing them into this suicidal, irrational fear as well as these Marxist degenerate ideas. So an article out of the UK says school indoctrination is turning British youth woke, but the Tories, the conservatives do nothing. Well, that's true. I mean, you know, we see that same type of thing here in the United States, even though they have a picture here of DeSantis and his rally and people saying there was stop woke. And he's got a, the sign there that

says freedom from indoctrination. That's really not what is happening so much with Republicans. They're trying to slow it down. They're making the case that the educational system can be fixed and it should be left in the hands of government. And that is a very dangerous and wrong idea. We all know that. Even when you look at an alt-right candidate like Tudor Nixon, who was unable to defeat Gretchen Whitmer. Why? Because she didn't really have any alternative. Her thing was, well, yeah, schools are, you know, we've got to keep these kids in school. You know, your big problem was that the kids didn't get

enough of this schooling. Well, what are they being taught? I want the school shut down. So this one person writes, Professor of Politics Eric Kaufman says, this is what I call cultural socialism, the desire to engineer equal outcomes to protect minority identity groups from psychological harm. All too often it takes priority for Gen Z and millennials over historic British values, such as freedom of speech, objective truth, attachment to the nation's historical accomplishments. Contrary to the fairy tales conservative politicians tell themselves,

these young people will not change their views as they pass through milestones like taking a job or owning a home or having children. The woke revolution is cultural. It is not material. It's getting pretty close to it. It's spiritual. It's not material.

And it's not even cultural. It is spiritual. And it is a spiritual war that's being conducted. And it's being conducted through these schools. That's why I call them seminaries of Satan, because they're pushing hopelessness, they're pushing hate, they're pushing dependency, they're pushing fear, all these different, the climate is going to destroy us all.

He said among survey respondents under the age of 26, more were opposed to the defense of academic freedom of speech by somebody who is gender critical. A philosopher, Kathleen Stock, who was hounded by a mob of campus trans activists. This age group, those under 26, evenly divided between those who want J.K. Rowling dropped by her publisher and those who think she should stay, evenly divided between those who want Churchill's statue to be removed

or for it to remain in Parliament Square. By contrast, those over 50 supporting Rowling and Churchill by an overwhelming 85 to 5 margin. And yet for the younger generation, it's 50-50. We've always heard, going back to Plato, give me a child when they're young and they're mine for life. And all these dictators have repeated that in one form or the other. Going back to Plato's Republic, We used to once upon a time understand in American society the importance of family and raising and training children and instilling values and culture in them. That's why you have stable communities like the Amish or the Orthodox

Jews or whatever. It's because they have families who raise their children instead of shipping them off to a government boarding school. And it doesn't do any good to just bring the kids home at night, feed them and put them to bed and let them watch Disney in the meantime, right? That's what's happened. We're not raising our kids anymore. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. People used to understand that. And they used to value family. They used to

value mother's roles in that. Among the 18-year-olds I sampled, he says 63% were taught or had heard from an adult at school about at least one of these things, white privilege, unconscious bias, or systemic racism. Three concepts derived from critical race theory. If we include radical feminist ideas such as patriarchy or the idea of many genders, this rises to 78% of the 18-year-olds have been taught this in school because that's what this is all focused on. He said the gravity, the writer at Daily Skeptic says, in commenting on Professor Kaufman, gravity of the situation cannot be underestimated. Kaufman said if most Britons no longer believe in

freedom of speech or in scientific reason, because they don't believe in any objective truth. They say math is hateful and racist because it's subjective. If they view our past as a racist nightmare, this is not some culture war sideshow. It undermines the very essence of British civilization. But even when they look at this, they're not understanding the foundation that it's built on. Again, it is a spiritual foundation that is there. And if you take a secular view of this, and if you see this as a culture war, as a secular war, you're going to lose. These people don't understand how we develop the society that we have, and they won't do

what is necessary to protect it because they're focused on the society, because they're not focused on God. You see, once you focus on these horrible, the horrible fruit of our rejection of God, once you're focusing on that and you say, well, how do we fix this? Look at what society looks like. You certainly, you don't understand how we got here. And that is the key thing that has to be understood is how we got to this point. Okay, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Thank you. This is The David Knight Show.

All right, well, some good news in Australia from, again, a pragmatic standpoint. I had a couple of Australians win in the New South Wales Supreme Court case. New South Wales is a region like a state, we would say, in the United States, over COVID fines, meaning that if they establish this as a precedent, which most people think is going to set a precedent, they could have as many as 45,000 penalties could be

struck down. These are penalties for people violating these arbitrary restrictions of, well, you got to stay locked up inside. You can't lay out on the beach. We've seen all the pictures about, you know, an individual who's laying out on the beach, not a person in sight anywhere around that person. And so the busybody Australian cops take it upon themselves to go out and get in their face. You know, because they're supposed to isolate. They get in their face and issue them a citation. And these citations are pretty big. They were $1,000 to $3,000 Australian dollars.

And so a couple of these people fought this. They have now won in the New South Wales Supreme Court. Two Sydneysiders challenged fines from the public health order breaches in New South Wales. Thousands more such fines across New South Wales could now be found invalid. And so the man and woman claimed that their infringement notices were issued in such vague terms that they could not be legally enforced and would be difficult, if not impossible, to challenge in front of a magistrate. One of them said these two notices

do not sufficiently state or describe the offenses in general terms. That was part of the decision. The problem with this, again, is that they, I'm glad that they stopped this. I'm glad they rolled this thing back. These are very substantial fines. The government is out of line with all of this stuff, but they don't approach this on principle. This is on a technicality.

And so it's a good thing that they're rolling this stuff back, but it doesn't really help the cause of freedom and liberty when you only win on a technicality. Again, as I said, one of these individuals was fined $3,000 Australian dollars for unlawfully participating in an outdoor public gathering. 19,000 fines handed out in Victoria for breaches of COVID lockdown laws. Many of these were on the beaches.

Breaches on the beaches. How about that? But tens of thousands across the rest of Australia affected in all this. One person, one of the plaintiffs here, was fined for sitting on a hill in a park with his girlfriend in August of 2021, when they were approached by four police officers while Sydney was in lockdown. So you are allowed to be with people in your own household. They're sitting outdoors by themselves on a park bench.

And so four police officers come over. If this was a real pandemic, that would be a real stupid thing to do, wouldn't it? He was within one kilometer of his home and was told by police that he and his girlfriend had breached a public health order by not actively exercising. They said, you can get outside of your home if you were exercising, as long as you're exercising. Well, I mean, you're going to be breathing more and all the rest of that. I mean, anyway, it's all just so incredibly ludicrously arbitrary. Ms. Lee said the fines were generally issued to people who were engaged

in recreation or exercise for not observing sufficient distance rules. Some were for pursuing activities as basic as grocery shopping. In most cases, people were not flouting the laws. She said, uh, the laws were being applied wrongly. Well, I think they should have been flouting the laws. Uh, so yeah, they might've been might have been people who are engaged in recreation, but, you know, they're, again, the problem with all of this is that they didn't say, you don't have the right to tell me

what I can and cannot do. It's my body and, you know, all the rest of the stuff. It's this Marxist, collectivist approach to health that absolutely disregards individual health as well as freedom and liberty and individual rights. The Air Force. This came out yesterday as I interviewed Davis Yance, the lawyer who has been fighting for the military against these arbitrary and wholesale rejections of religious exemptions, not even considering them. Davis Johnson, if you haven't seen the interview, I highly recommend that, even if you're not

in the military. It's very important to understand how our government is operating, how they are betraying people, but also how dishonest they become, how contemptuous they are of the Constitution. Because in the Coast Guard, as he pointed out, it's one of the worst of all the different ones, and they're operating a little bit differently and apart from the primary military branches. But as he was pointing out in the Coast Guard,

they're coaching people over these religious exemptions. So, you know, start them out by asking them about their political beliefs. So then we can go back and say, see, the very first thing they talked about was politics. And so that's really what's in the forefront of their mind. It isn't about any concern about religious issues. This is just a political thing. At the top of the Drudge Report yesterday, oh, look, we've got more Republicans than Democrats who, you know, died from COVID or something like that. It's absolute nonsense.

Earlier in the week, it was more people who were vaccinated who died than there were unvaccinated. So they have to pull that back by cherry picking their statistics. But again, the air force, he said, we're going to have a result on this. Well, it came out yesterday,

air force essentially doing the same thing that he was talking about wrongly dismissing people who have a, a religious exemption request. The, um, a circuit court in March had ordered the department of defense, which mandated vaccinations for all members of the military, to hold off on disciplining and separating airmen while the lawsuit progresses.

That's the funny thing about it. Even though this is all coming from the Pentagon, coming from a single point, the courts are going in one branch of the services at a time. So we'll stop it with the Navy. All right, now we'll stop it with the Air Force. And as he pointed out, it's been done with all of them except for the Army because the Army has rolled this out a little bit slower than the other branches rolled out these mandates. But it's all coming from the same spot.

It seems to me like if all the courts are finding that the Department of Defense has violated the Constitution, violated their own rules and regulations and laws, and said, we're not even going to consider religious exemptions, it seems like that ought to do it. But they have to do it one branch at a time. They found that the Air Force wrongly relied on overly broad reasoning to turn down the waivers. They relied on its broadly formulated reasons for the vaccine mandate to deny

specific exemptions to plaintiffs, especially since it had granted secular exemptions to colleagues. The latest opinion from Ohio's sixth circuit court alleges that the air force adopted a uniform policy of denying religious exemption, but not exemption requests made for secular reasons, regardless of the requester's individual circumstances. So what they're saying is that, you know, well, okay, if it's secular, we'll take a look at it. If it's religious, just forget it.

We're not even going to consider it. We're not even going to consider it. So, you know, again, coaching them as to how to get rid of the Air Force, the Coast Guard coaching people how to trip up and, you know, to deny these, have a basis for plausible deniability. But it was just a form. The evidence is undisputed that the Air Force has a uniform practice of denying religious exemptions to anyone who wants to remain in the service, said the court. That's what the court found with all this stuff. So, yeah, you know, is this a religious issue? Yeah, here's something that a lot of people pointed out, and I don't have a good explanation for this, but this is a Korean live game playing that they were doing. And we've had so many videos.

I haven't shown these things, and people put together a compilation of it because there's so many surveillance cameras around everywhere. People got them on their doorbells on the front porch. Businesses have them throughout the facilities. And so we've seen picture after picture after picture of people who died suddenly while they were at work or something like that. And they'll be working along fine. And all of a sudden, you know, they don't clutch their chest or anything. Instead, they look over their shoulder and they start fighting off something that they see there. And then they die. And this happened on a, pull the sound down a little bit here so I can keep talking.

So these guys, watch the guy on the left. These guys are doing a live broadcast as they're playing video games. Everything is perfectly normal. And then in a little bit here, you're going to see him start to fight off something that he thinks he sees over his shoulder. Look at that, He's turning around. He's like, what? What?

And now he's fighting this thing, falls down, and he dies. So yeah, talk about the religious exemption of these types of things, right? There is something that is happening here. I don't know what that is, but I got to say, you know, when you, if they can't explain that, well, they don't even bother to try to explain anything. It's rare. So we don't care. Oregon produced a report. They had the public health department there in response to a Senate bill.

A Senate bill said, we want you to study how we've done in terms of this pandemic. And so we want you to generate some statistics about this. So the public health authority there in the state, the Oregon Public Health Authority, farmed it out to a company. And the company produced such ridiculously high numbers, especially for children, COVID-19 hospitalization rates. Now, the first thing about this that you need to know

is that when they talk about hospitalization rates, this isn't somebody who gets some kind of a respiratory illness. They bring, they give them a test and they say, oh, well, you know, that's not cold or flu or RSV, that's COVID. And we're going to have to put you in the hospital. That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about people have to go to the hospital, maybe because they got a cut and then they give them a COVID test. And then, you know, they magnify the COVID test by 1.1 trillion times with a cycle threshold of 40. Oh, well, it tested positive. So that is called a COVID-19 hospitalization rate. You may think when you hear that, that these are people who are being taken to the hospital because they got COVID-19. Not at all.

But apart from that, this private company apparently knew that the public health department there in Oregon wanted some high numbers. So they gave them some high numbers. So high, as a matter of fact, that people said, that is not true. 725 page report. I wonder how much this company got paid. I bet it was a lot of money. There is so much money floating around for all this COVID MacGuffin. The Faults claim that COVID-19 hospitalization rates among children were as high as 47.5%.

And according to the Oregon Health Authority and their numbers, the hospitalization rate in 2021 among children aged 0 to 9 was just 0.9%. Those aged 10 to 19, it was 0.6%. And then a report issued in July showed the first six months of June 2021 was even lower than that. Instead of it being 0.9 and 0.6, it was 0.6 and 0.3. So they were anywhere from 50 times higher, if you take the higher number, when they came out with their report saying it was 47.5% when actually it was less than 1%,

a tiny fraction in most of these cases. They were anywhere from 150 times higher than the actual test to 158 times higher. This is how they're hyping this. This is how they're pushing this fear to everybody. Because again, these are people who, hospitalization rates are the percentage of people who tested positive admitted to a hospital, not even there because they were sick from that type of thing. So these are the ways that they are manipulating the narrative. And at the same time, they hype this up anywhere from 150 to 160 times what it actually is. They want to look the other way as now on a daily basis, we're seeing a couple of people

who are celebrities. They can't ignore it when it happens to a celebrity dropping dead unexpectedly, immediately. Immediately, Jake Flint, a country singer, only 37 years old, just hours after his wedding, died suddenly. This, you know, as I played for you yesterday, Dr. Peter McCullough said, look, we know what the mechanism is of this with a heart and other things. And he said, um, if, and unless the family comes out and says, this person was not vaccinated, you should understand at this point in time, the sudden adult death that we're seeing here, that is what is behind it. And unless somebody else comes out and disproves that, uh, that is what it, uh, what it is. And we need to start to understand that and speak to that. But they're not. They control the media. They control the information. They control, as the Outer Limits said, we are in charge of your television set. We control the vertical.

We control the horizontal setback. We're in charge for the next half hour. And we're going to tell you what is happening. And that is what has been happening to us for the last three years. It is beyond belief that they're able to continue to get away with this. Um, well, we're just about out of time. I didn't want to talk. Well, I think what we'll do is we'll just, uh, continue this, uh, tomorrow. A lot of things. Oh, by the way, we're going to be continuing it tonight.

Not even tomorrow. Uh, almost forgot tonight. We're going to have, for those of you who are Rockfin subscribers, we will have at 7 p.m. Eastern time. We'll be going live on Rockfin. So join us there. That's Global Warning. Of course, Monday through Friday, the show during the day is free to anyone. But that is just for listeners. And we try to make it a lot more interactive.

So I hope you can join us. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.