The David Knight Show - 1Mar23 China Fires Opening Shots in Lithium War; "Organoid Intelligence", Growing Human Brains as AI Hosts

Episode Date: March 1, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESWhy there's a stuffed coyote over my shoulder today… 2:06Why libertarian think tanks and most politicians love toll roads and why I see them as one more area of multinational "stakeholder" governance 7:21Colonel McGregor lays out the big picture — bigger than Ukraine/Russia 21:05The World Economic Forum’s Global Redesign Initiative. 29:08How Operation Gladio set the template for "Stop the Steal" with a common participant 32:23The media’s new obsession: dismissing "15 minute cities" as harmless conveniences twisted by "conspiracy theorists". 46:49From Paul Ryan to Tucker & Sean — what the Dominion lawsuit has shown us about FOX News. 58:14Apple’s “Clean Energy Charging” feature is getting people upset for all the wrong reasons. They still don't see the nanny hectoring for what it is 1:14:03Indulgences for the Green Religion: "Cap and Trade" in Washington State quickly adds 40 cents/gallon and that's just the beginning 1:18:52Analysts push geo-engineering even as they warn about it's impact for food and the potential for war over who gets to set the thermostat 1:30:13How the spy who inspired Ian Fleming's James Bond made the first crucial moves to grab and control oil resources and how the 20th century's wars for oil will pivot to the 21st century's war for lithium 1:34:33Who has lithium and the ability to process it? How does China match up to USA in lithium? 1:38:19China fires first shots in the lithium wars — the essential resource for the imposed technology 1:44:26Cancel mob of trannies comes for composer and co-founder of virtual instrument I use to create music for this show. BTW, what are "virtual instruments", how are they used today and how have they evolved over the last 50 years? 1:49:58ILLIBERAL EDUCATION — 40% of LIBERAL professors who agree with the mob are now afraid they’ll lose their jobs over a misunderstanding. 2:07:33Generative AI is poised to be the free world’s next great gift to authoritarians. 2:22:31The "Next Thing" in AI: OI (Organoid Intelligence), growing human brains to host AI 2:32:29"Meat Grinder". Retired US Marine fighting in Ukraine says life expectancy of new Ukrainian recruits is 4 HOURS in the massive artillery assault happening now. And, drones and cyber attacks in Russia. But GOP leaders say Biden must be MORE aggressive. Who speaks for peace? 2:41:08Judge (a Justice of the Peace) in Arizona is relentlessly persecuting rancher accused of killing a trafficker on his property. Even the detective investigating the case is amazed at the lack of evidence in the kangaroo court proceedings 2:51:30Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Merrick presents Real or Not Real. Merrick Dog Food. Real or Not Real. Real! That's right. Merrick's made with real ingredients. Because real is our recipe. Visit MerrickPetCare.com Using free speech to free minds.

You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 1st of March. Year of Our Lord 2023. Day 1084 of the emergency. And we're back on air. We've had our own little emergency for the last 24 hours. I'll start by telling you about that. And we got everything switched over to an Airbnb where we're going to be for a couple of days until we can get internet back at our house. So give me the whole story about that. A lot of news. We've got speech issues that have hit pretty close to home. I'll tell you about that. Also, the arrest of a woman with tuberculosis. What does this tell us that is on its way? We'll are right now. We're in an Airbnb. We've had a lot of things have happened over the last couple of days.

I really want to thank Tony and Don Jeffries and Billy Ray Valentine for stepping in at the last minute. They did a great job, as always. We lost power on Monday before we could get all the full shows up. As a matter of fact, we had a tree that fell. We had a lot of wind going through the area. Knocked down a tree, which did major damage to power lines and to the fiber cable that we have. And the power people got it done with it because there were other places that were out of power as well. But they got to us late on Monday night.

But, of course, the fiber people didn't. And the strange thing about the way this is set up, there's a company that runs the fiber, but they're really just the software side. The infrastructure, the cables and everything are done by the electric company. And this is the second time this has happened. We haven't been here quite a year.

Second time this happened. And there's no coordination between the two of them. And the side of the electric company that handles the cable and they run them on the same poles works from nine to five. And they don't work late at night like the electric people do, because I guess they figure most people just stream in movies. And so we try to impress on them that this is something that we have to have. This is our business. This is what we do on a regular basis. But a couple of days of this yesterday, they promised they were out first thing in the morning yesterday and they promised that they would get it up, and they promised

this all through the day. And so now we have promises that they're going to come back today, but they also told us at one point in time they thought it would be two or three days. So we've got this Airbnb for two or three days. It's easy to back up the power, actually. What's not easy is to back up the internet at the bandwidth that we need. So we've tried hotspots, but we haven't been able to get the bandwidth that we need. So we've tried hotspots. We haven't been able to get the bandwidth that we need to run the show on a hotspot.

So late last night, we were able to find this Airbnb. My son's worked about 10 hours taking down the studio and reassembling it here. So kudos to them. Did a great job. Seems like everything is working more or less. And so we'll see what happens on this, uh, on this live broadcast. But, um, as you can see, maybe a little bit, uh, over my shoulder there, we got a stuffed

coyote head here. I've never seen anybody, uh, stuff a coyote. Uh, I think that's what we're pretty sure that's what got scout back in Texas. So if I'd had a chance, I would have done that as well. A word about the show in the last couple of days, by the way. So there was a problem live streaming yesterday to Odyssey and DLive. We had it up on Rumble, Rockfin, and Twitter. That was a live show. We have not gotten up the full show from yesterday yet. We will be getting it up later today. As I said, everything went down before I could even get the

podcasts out on Monday. So late last night, I got Monday's podcast out. The full show went up to the video platforms, there's four of them, before we lost power. So we'll get the rest of that stuff up. I apologize, everybody. Many people, I guess, figured that we have just disappeared. But no, we're still here. And so I want to begin today with what is happening with the New World Order. I'll talk a little bit about what's going on with the speech issues. And that was covered very well by Tony Arterburn and Don Jeffries and Billy Ray Valentine as they were talking about what's happening at Fox News. I think that's a very, it's very instructive for a couple of issues. The media, what is the media telling us? What is going on with elections and

the corruption that is involved in that? I think it's a very important story, but they did cover that. I want to begin today by talking about the New World Order and the smart cities and the rest of this stuff. We have a major campaign to, even as you have C40, as well as Davos and the UN talking about the smart cities and more and more granularity, even as they're rolling out their model applications of this, we have a major pushback telling us not to worry about it.

It's just some crazy conspiracy theorists, and they're always trying to stir the pot and get everybody upset about nothing. Well, one of the things, as a matter of fact, just as an aside here, I was yesterday, originally, we had planned on being in Nashville to speak about a state bank and central bank digital currency. That got delayed. It's not been confirmed yet, but I think it's going to happen next week. So we may have Tony back for that as well, but to take the show.

But I may have an opportunity to talk about toll roads as well. And when you look at what is happening to our infrastructure, when you look at what is happening, for example, going back toas and the toll road issue there you have on the one hand libertarians like the reason foundation love to talk about toll roads they just love that idea as if it wasn't user fees when you pay for your gasoline at the pump right but um you know and they even make that point when they talk about it. There was an interesting article I found going through looking at the toll road stuff, going back to Forbes in 2017, talking about what had been happening in Texas.

They started farming their stuff out to corporations, mostly foreign corporations running the toll roads in 2003. This type of model that is now being rolled out to us by Davos, a corporate governance worldwide by stakeholders, that type of thing, that's been going on a long time. And the toll roads are exactly that. And so they say, well, it's been a great moneymaker for Texas. They made $40 billion.

Well, I ask you, where did that $40 billion come from? Those are extra expenses that perhaps they would be in the price of gas, but perhaps not. Because when you look at the amount of money that's there, this is one of the problems that I have to begin with with the private-public partnership. If they're going to farm this out and they say, well, we only have to put in about 15% to 20% of the construction cost,

and then we get back all this money. We don't have to do anything. Well, what is the government for anyway? I mean, certainly at the state level, I don't like the federal government getting involved in infrastructure. I don't like the government bribing and blackmailing people with money for basic services. But it's something that I think is better done by the government. I disagree with libertarians on this. I don't think that private roads are the answer. Because the government can provide this at cost.

That's what they should do. They shouldn't be making a profit off of this. But if Texas is getting $40 billion, how much are the corporations getting? Because the corporations are not selling the toll roads to you at cost. The other part of it is that if you look at, again, they had a survey that was done, 2017 Forbes article, they looked at a 2014 survey from Texas A&M. Texas A&M asked the public in a large survey, what do you think should be done to improve transportation infrastructure for cars and that type of thing?

And they gave them about 12 different possibilities. By far, the least popular possibility was toll roads. Because we know we're getting ripped off. We know that it's the cost plus a profit for a foreign corporation. And so, you know, by the way, the most popular, they had people rank it from 1 to 10, and then they took an average of the respondees, right? So the most popular one, it was over 8,

was adjust the timing of the traffic lights. That's a no-brainer, isn't it? Can't they do that? But it doesn't really cost them much at all either. And the least popular were the toll roads at an average of three. The second least popular item was over five. Just goes to show how strikingly unpopular toll roads are. So if you want to avoid using the state capital to build and maintain roads,

and you charge people through gas taxes, whatever it costs, but do it again. The government should be doing this at cost. Hopefully, they're doing it efficiently. They don't need to get some different people in, because we all understand how the government contracts get loaded with crony capitalism as it is. That's one of the reasons why they can't build any infrastructure, which brings me to this article I was talking about. But

if you're going to do it, do it at the state level. Try to get rid of the corruption as much as you can. I know it's always going to be there. Corruption is going to be there when the roads are built by private corporations as well. And one of the reasons that Forbes was doing it was because the toll roads were going bankrupt in Texas, many of them, especially the one that had, it was a high-speed toll road. Made a lot of news because it was the fastest speed limit in the U.S., 85 miles an hour, and they still couldn't get people to pay to do that. What does that tell you? I know some people who take that toll road if they're going down to San Antonio from the Austin area. Karen actually wrote to somebody who did it. She said, yeah,

it's great. No traffic. Nobody's on there. And you can go 85 miles an hour or faster. You know, so it's, but what's, they had so few people who wanted to do it that it went bankrupt. Because people see this, rightfully so, as essentially paying twice and paying a profit to a corporation. So when you look at what has happened again, if you just do a, any kind of project now, and it's not just the United States,

it's Canada. Other places is sent to me by a listener, David Weatherly, who used to live in Canada. They have, they're talking about an upgrade to their subway line in Toronto and it's going to cost them a billion Canadian dollars per kilometer now kilometers six tenths of a mile oh yeah let's figure about two billion dollars a

mile Canadian dollars and that's the estimate before they get started. They always have price overruns. And what the article was about was how long it was going to take them to do it. You have a whole expression. Good, fast and cheap, we used to say in engineering. Pick

two at most. If you're lucky, you can get two of those. There's always going to be a trade-off between speed, quality and cost, we used to say in engineering. Pick two at most. If you're lucky, you can get two of those. There's always going to be a trade-off between speed, quality, and cost, right? And if you're really good, you can get two of those, but you're never going to get all three of them. You may not get any of them if it's being run

by the Toronto government. It's going to take about 20 months that they're going to shut down the streetcar, the existing, some existing public transportation. And they said, um, a section of the street is anticipated to close for nearly five years, but of course it will take longer and it will cost more. And that's what I saw all throughout Texas as they were putting in these toll roads that, again, not very many people used. And what they did was it took them forever to build this thing.

How many man hours were lost and woman hours, if you want, wasted, setting in traffic with all this construction that went on for years and years. And then when it opens up, they've added traffic lights to, you know, make it more expedient to take the toll roads. And they come with agreements that the government will not build or expand any transportation close to those toll roads. So you've got the corporations in charge. They've got a monopoly on transportation in that area, and they're going to shut down any competition in that area. But of course, the governor in Tennessee wants to call them choice lanes. They're coercion lanes, is what they are. Just like the choice of having a vaccine mandate. Oh, it's not a mandate, they said.

We're not dragging you out of the house and sticking this in your arm. You've got a choice. You can either have a job or the vaccine. You can either go to school or travel, or you can have the vaccine. All the costs, they said, are being covered by the province. Not the city, but the province, the state government, essentially. And it's already doubled their initial estimates estimates and they haven't even started on this thing yet. Businesses are set to be impacted by the construction.

They're asking for transparency and accountability because they've seen this movie before they talked about how much longer other projects had taken than they had anticipated. So as all of this is happening, we have academics now calling for a World War II style rationing of food and fuel in order to stop climate change. You understand that the 15-minute city is designed so that they can lock us down. And I've seen some commentators saying well this is really a climate lockdown it is except they're never going to end it this is a permanent lockdown that's one of the things they don't talk about and so uh the uh the zero hedge article says there's no concrete evidence of course supporting the theory that man-made carbon

emissions have any relevance whatsoever to weather and climate change there's no concrete evidence, of course, supporting the theory that man-made carbon emissions have any relevance whatsoever to weather and climate change. There's no evidence of a climate crisis. There's no evidence that human industry and agriculture marks a negative impact on the Earth's temperatures. There's no evidence that carbon emissions have a causational effect on global warming. No evidence to support a tipping point theory that asserts that if you have just one and a half degree centigrade change, it's going to be a catastrophe globally. Again, based on what? The founder of the Weather Channel said, how could you even talk about that?

All the records that we have, and we don't have records going back that far. We don't have records in that many different areas in terms of thermometers that are setting it all those old records temperature records were obtained by looking at mercury thermometers you can't get that kind of accuracy on a mercury thermometer number one number two we've seen these land readings are always skewed because what has happened is urbanization and if they haven't turned it into a concrete jungle where the thermometers were, they move the thermometers in many cases to an airport tarmac. And of course, you're going to see an increase in temperatures that way. But if you look at it from satellites in space, you do not see that.

You don't see any warming. Anyway, right now in Europe, the farming industry is facing a basic Armageddon as governmental red tape and climate-based taxation are set to make the growing of food impossible for a majority of farmers. That's the point with all this. And so, you know, why should you care? They say, well, do you eat? Do you travel? Do you want to own anything? In a paper titled Rationing and Climate Change Mitigation, they assert that rapid reduction of global emissions is needed, that rationing similar to standards enforced during the two world wars, especially those during World War II, should be enforced again by governments.

And why is that? Well, because I've said over and over again, as we've seen for the last 1,084 days, our governments and every nation of the world are at war with their people. And it doesn't matter what political party they say they are, what political philosophy they say they are. They're at war with their own people. And of course, sanctions, rationing, and things like that

are one of the things that you do to your enemy. So this is coming. It's going to be coming through CBDC especially. Listen to this statement by the president of Alibaba. We're developing through technology an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint. What does that mean?

That's where are they traveling? How are they traveling? What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform? So individual carbon footprint tracker. Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet, but this is something that we're working on. Well, of course, we were all demanding that, right? What we all want is some way for us to

track our carbon footprint. Of course, we don't care about that. They care about it. They're the ones who are pushing this. The creation of the climate crisis boogeyman is an obvious ploy for centralized authoritarianism in the name of the greater good. That's exactly what this is. This is about creating a world in which every individual is required to constantly justify their existence. I like the way Zero Hedge article puts that. To prove that you're worthy. We are not worthy. We're not worthy. To the globalist machine, it's tantamount to emissions-based slavery. That's right. I've said that for the longest time.

Smart cities for dumb slaves. If you buy that, and of course, he was making that statement in the World Economic Forum. And so this article by Mike Whitney, The Plan to Wreck America. Well, we all know that, don't we? I was surprised. I did think he had three good quotes in this that I thought were very important to see. One of them from Colonel McGregor,

who was talking about the big picture. You know, he's talked a great deal about what's going on in Ukraine and with the Russian war. He's been giving people a very different view of that. And I think he's been right in terms of what he's had to say. But when you look at this, you know, like I said, there's some good quotes in this article. But I was surprised at how it started out. Listen to this. Establishment elites and their media not only stood four square behind Russia gate,

the Trump impeachment, the BLM riots, and the January 6th fiasco, they also had a hand in the COVID hysteria and the host of repressive measures that were imposed in the name of public health. They had a hand in it? I think they were four square behind it in every way possible. So I was really kind of surprised at that.

And you notice that the perceived problems that he has here are essentially partisan. This is a bipartisan war against us. And we'll talk about that coming up. Even the Ukraine war and the coming Chinese war are a bipartisan move against us. The establishment Republicans are as much into this as the authoritarian Democrats. So just like the pandemic, we're going to see this happening with climate. We're going to be told, well, eventually they'll come out and say, yeah, you know, it didn't work. But we had to because

it was an emergency. We didn't have any time to test anything, right? So yeah, I know that we completely destroyed the electric grid. I know we crashed the economy and all the rest of this stuff, but Hey, you know, we just had to, um, because it was an emergency. Maybe someday they'll say, okay, it wasn't an emergency. We haven't gotten to that point with a pandemic yet. Have we, they still want to admit that as a matter of fact, they're still out there pushing now the lab leak

and still fighting over that because they want to push the idea that this was something that was dangerous and it was necessary. That's one of the reasons why they're pushing this. Another reason they're pushing it is because they want fear. The third reason they're pushing this lab leak stuff so much, you've got the FBI, you've got the Department of Energy, you've got the clowns on late-night TV mocking, still mocking, the idea that it came from a lab, that it was designed.

Nevertheless, they're pushing this out because they want fear. They want to tell you that it was serious, really was an emergency. And now because they want to escalate public opinion against China, because that's their next move. So we're not at this point yet where they're going to say, well, okay, it wasn't an emergency. But understand, this is all national governments. This is not just the U.S. government, although the U.S. government has really taken the lead. So here's what Colonel McGregor said about the big picture. Overnight, Russia must be destroyed.

It's interesting because I was reading a document that was authored by George Soros over 10 years ago, in which he talked specifically about this kind of all-out war that would ultimately come against Russia because he said this is the last nationalist state that rests on a foundation, obviously, of Orthodox Christian culture with Russian identity at its core. That has to be removed. See, I think the people that are in charge of the West and in charge in Washington think that they have successfully destroyed the national identities of the European and American peoples, that we have no sense of ourselves, our borders are undefended, we present no resistance to incoming migrants from the developing world who essentially roll over us as though we owe them a living and that our laws do not count. Thus far, I would say

that's a pretty good assessment, an accurate evaluation of what we've been doing. I think that's a great victory for George Soros and the globalists, the anti-nationalists, those who want open borders. And they call it an open society, which means that you end up with nothing, an amorphous mass of people struggling to survive who are reduced to the lowest levels of subsistence. So that's in the background. And in fact, he even goes so far as talking about how useful it would be if East Europeans were the ones whose lives were expended in this process and not West Europeans who simply will not take the casualties. This is not a minor matter. This is the sort of thinking that is so destructive and so evil, in my judgment, that that's really what we're dealing with in our own countries,

and I think Putin recognizes that. So for him, it's existential, and I think the Russian people see it this way. These reports of, oh, the Russians are miserable and want to get rid of Putin. I guess you can find somebody over there. I don't know how many. But certainly in the high 80s, he has approval ratings. And I'd say that if anybody tried to remove the man, he'd probably be killed or cut down long before he got near the Kremlin by Russians who strongly support what's happening. I think they know their survival is at risk. Yeah, I spoke last week about a video I saw from Konstantin Kisin.

He said, well, so what people like Putin? I mean, he's authoritarian in many regards. He checks most of the boxes for that. But they're looking at this. They understand they're under attack from NATO, number one. Number two, he said when the Soviet Union fell, it was total chaos. Things got even worse than it was under the Soviet Union, and things were very chaotic, and he brought order.

And so people saw him as bringing order to that situation. So those two things, even though he's incredibly authoritarian by our standards, as Konstantin Kisin said, so define democracy. He goes, ask a Russian to define that. They've never lived under democracy. The country's been around for 800 years. They've never seen it. So they look at these authoritarian things that we may recoil at,

resting opposition leaders. Are we really that far away here in the so-called democratic West? As Colonel McGregor pointed out, one of the things he said there, so you wind up with an amorphous mass of people struggling to survive who are reduced to the lowest levels of subsistence. That's exactly what they're aiming for. They want to remove our history, remove our culture. If you have no culture, no history, you have no vision of who you are, where you're going, what's happening with your family, your posterity. They want to instill in everyone a sense of guilt. Just take a look at what they're doing to students in school. Oh, you're white?

Oh, well, you're instantly guilty. As a matter of fact, they have beaten them into the ground. These self-loathing white liberals that we've talked about for years, they were a product of the educational system, and they've recycled through. They've now become teachers. And it's getting intensified, every bit of this. And so that is the war against us.

That is one of the things that Russia is not suffering from. At that point, the self-loathing of the public. And, of course, they have seen hardship in so many different ways. But they understand this is an existential crisis. And look, even if they didn't, Putin knows it. You have Lala Harris saying he's a war criminal. We've got to capture him. We've got to take him to justice and everything.

He saw what happened in Yugoslavia, where the people that had been flagged by NATO, what happened to them. There was also an excellent article by Kurt Nemo. Remember him? He used to be the editor at InfoWars when I went there, when it was worth reading the articles. Not anymore. It's now become a joke. But Kurt Nemo is still out there writing.

He's got a great insight on Substack. He says, I challenge people to investigate the World Economic Forum's global redesign initiative, according to the Transnational Institute in the Netherlands, of course. Mark Rutte, this disciple of Klaus Schwab, is really setting the Netherlands up to be a hub, if you will, in many different ways, especially of food distribution and taking control of and taking away food supply. A transition, they said, this is what the organization says, a transition away from intergovernmental decision-making toward a system of multi-stakeholder governance. In other words, by stealth, they are marginalizing a recognized

model where we vote in governments who then negotiate treaties, which are then ratified by our elected representatives with a model where a self-selected group of stakeholders make decisions on our behalf. Well, that's what we're seeing with the World Health Organization and the pandemic treaty and the new rules that they put in. We're going to negotiate treaties. By the way, we won't even bother to vote on it. We'll just be led into it by Biden. No, we're looking at global governance.

We're looking at a kleptocracy, government by thieves. And the thieves are going to be multinational corporations, as you see operating at the World Economic Forum, at Bilderberg, and these other places. That is where they're getting the initial capital for this tyranny. It's where they get the technology for it. And that's how these people become stakeholders. In other words, large transnational corporate stakeholders will be deciding where you live, what you eat, whether or not you reproduce.

They will tell you what you can and cannot rent from them. And again, excellent article from Kurt Nemo. What he's saying is that these billionaire elites, says Whitney, paraphrasing the full article, are now so powerful they can openly say that they're going to transition away from intergovernmental decision-making, in other words, representative government, to a system of multi-stakeholder governance. You see, the world government, at least in its early forms, is going to be a distributed network to some degree. It's going to be a cabal, an oligarchy.

It's not going to be a single point. It's going to be like Hydra, maybe, you know? Oh, yes, multi-headed thing. In which only the billionaire stakeholders have a vote in which policies are implemented. He says, but isn't that the way things work already? It is the way things work already. Decisions are being made by a handful of people

who brag about what they're going to do. They were never voted into office. We've seen this throughout the lockdown. We've seen this from bureaucrats as well as from foreign bureaucrats, whether they're in the EU or other places. And then the third thing that I thought was interesting about this was an article from the SACRE about Operation Gladio, which I've talked about many times. If you remember Operation Gladio, it actually means Operation Sword. It's Italian for sword, you know, just like gladiators. And the article

was Operation Gladio, NATO's secret war for international fascism. And this was something that was put together by NATO. They wanted to have a leave-behind army with weapons that were stashed. In case the Russians had some kind of a lightning strike into Europe, they'd be able to already have an armed resistance that could engage in guerrilla warfare against the successful Russians. Well, that never happened. But after about 20 years, they started falsifying operations, acting as if they were communists. You had an interesting creation of an army of communists, and the foot soldiers were true believers, most of them,

but the people who were running the thing at the top were NATO. And they were running this as anti-Western, anti-NATO. So NATO is running this anti-NATO organization because they want to create chaos. Remember? How do you do this stuff? Well, you do it from the inside. You do it with disruption., you do it from the inside. You do it with disruption. And you do it iteratively.

And so you had people like Nato Kissinger. He was a big part of Operation Gladio, the way it was used in the 1970s. And, of course, Steve Pchenik, Alex's favorite commentator on the sting and the January the 6th stuff. There was, and the reason this article was written was to focus on some statements that were made by a guy by the name of Yves Guérin-Sarrac. I've not seen him before. That's what I thought was interesting about this. The person that many have called the black ops grand master behind operation gladio he wrote the basic training and propaganda manuals which can be fairly described as the gladio order of battle

he was an agent provocateur an assassin a bomber an intelligence intelligence agent, the intellectual grandmaster behind the strategy of tension that was essential to the success of Operation Gladio. The strategy of tension. Well, what is that about? Well, he said, our belief is that the first phase of political activity ought to be to create the conditions favoring the installation of chaos isn't it interesting you know they leave these little breadcrumbs around everywhere do you remember get smart with a Don Adams he was for an organization was called

control and the bad guys were an organization that was called chaos uh isn't it interesting I wonder it even shows up in the comedies doesn't it so they were favoring the installation of chaos and all the structures of the government in our view the first move we should make is to destroy the structure of the democratic state under the cover of communist and pro-soviet activities we have people who have infiltrated these groups so in italy they were called the red brigade they were openly favoring Marxism, and yet it was being run by NATO, demanding NATO be removed, and trying to overthrow the government so they could put in their own government. Interesting, isn't it? The parallels, I think, to January the 6th and Stop the Steal. Isn't it most important?

The first phase of political activity needs to be installing chaos. What have we seen? Well, you know, there's another phase to it. He says the two forms of terrorism can provoke such a situation. You can have a breakdown of the state. So he said you can have blind terrorism. We haven't seen anything like this, like we saw in Italy, where they were going around kneecapping business leaders.

You know, your capitalists were going to cripple you by shooting you in the knees and that type of thing. Or assassinations. So you can have just blind terrorism, just indiscriminate violence against the masses. Or you can have selective terrorism terrorism where you eliminate chosen people. But he says this destruction of the state must be carried out under the cover of communist activities, because we don't want them to know who we are, of course. But he said popular opinion must be polarized in such a way

that we're being presented as the only instrument capable of saving the nation. Now I want you to think about what's happened the last few years. How many times, as a matter of fact, it was last Friday, and I got to apologize for losing my temper. I was concerned about it all over the weekend. I hate just losing my temper and screaming at somebody, which is what I did on Friday. But the guy came back and said, well, you know, as bad as Trump was,

even though he's put out this bioweapon that is killing people left and right, crippling people, sterilizing people, you know, he's our only hope. It's like, wow, how far down this plan are you really? Isn't this the same thing that we've seen? You know, we have, we've seen? What were we told after the election? After Trump had locked us down for a year, after he'd done all kinds of unconstitutional things, and I'm not just talking about the pandemic, I'm talking about gun control by executive order, then locking us down, then coming out, even to the extent, well, you know, he talked about hydroxychloroquine.

He talked about hydroxychloroquine. The next thing he starts rambling on about injecting bleach into your veins or something. And so he thoroughly discredits it. He was there to discredit, not to offer the idea of hydroxychloroquine. He never did anything to block the actions of state actors who said, no, we're not going to let you prescribe hydroxychloroquine. He never did anything to block the actions of state actors. He said, no, we're not going to let you prescribe hydroxychloroquine and zinc. We will take away your medical license or threaten to. You better not do it. It's in Michigan. Whitmer put out rules from the state medical board telling pharmacists and doctors, first of all, doctors, you don't prescribe this. Pharmacists, you don't fill this, all this type of stuff.

Where was he about that? I mean, he was giving her tens of billions ofist. You don't fill this, all this type of stuff. Where was he about that? I mean, he was giving her tens of billions of dollars. Why didn't he do anything about that? Well, you know, after all of the stuff that had happened, I'd say in the last two years of him being in,

after all of that, we were told after the election, after he stood down and allowed a new, a brand new form of corruption, which now he has embraced. Oh yeah, we will do ballot harvesting and we'll do it better than they do it. He wasn't opposed to ballot harvesting ever

because he could have stopped it. It was his lockdown election that generated that. So after all of that, we were told after the election, Trump was our only hope. We had to stop the steal. We had to go on January the 6th to the Capitol, all the rest of this stuff. That was one of the worst scams I have ever seen in my life.

And the constant use of someone like Steve Pachinik, who was at the very heart of Operation Gladio, to push this chaos, to push the idea that there's only one person and we got to save him and we got to do whatever it takes, up to and including violence with this stuff. That set up all the people who went to Washington, D.C. to peacefully protest, who didn't realize that nothing had been done and nothing was being done, nothing would be done, to actually fight this on the basis of corruption. See, that's why I disagree with the people of Fox News and the commentators like Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson.

You know, that's Trump. It's just crazy. You know, they don't ever address the real issues of corruption in elections. And they're massively corrupt and so why would you why would you do all of this and not address the male aspect of it the machine aspect of it and even the two-party political system and the control of the ballot and the debates aspect of. Why would you think that any of these elections are for real? Of course, there was fraud in it. That was not a ridiculous idea. What was a ridiculous idea was stop the steal on January the 6th. The only purpose of that was, again, to create chaos and to create an enemy class of the state.

You see, Trump is our only hope if we are conservatives, we're told. And now the left has now successfully portrayed anybody who questions their narrative about anything as MAGA extremists who are a threat. And so we have now got the target put on our back if we are not part of that camp. And of course, they want to believe that everybody is in one camp or the other. The objective of the operation is to completely disrupt all social relations and all interactions, to create feelings of uncertainty, to create polarization.

Is this not what happened with the Trump lockdown, with the lab leak narrative that has evidently no solution? You notice how they threw these things out? We got the lab leak problem. Don't be afraid because there's nothing you can do about it. We can't stop the gain-of-function stuff, never will. We're going to keep doing it. Be very afraid of corruption in elections, but we'll never let you do anything about it.

It's just there to create a sense of hopelessness and frustration that you can't do anything about it. These are manufactured crises that they manufactured in order to make you feel hopeless and helpless. And then find a group that can be scapegoated for the wide societal collapse. Well, that'll be the January 6th people or the Trump MAGA people, all labeled as extremist conservatives. And anybody then who questions anything that they do, even if you're not a Trump supporter or MAGA supporter, then you get put into that as well. And then present yourself as the best choice for restoring order. And as we're being divided into a civil war, that's happening on both sides. The Democrats are the best choice

for restoring order, they say. The Republicans say, well, no, we are. And actually, Donald Trump is the best source for that. So you see, CIA and NATO and Pachinik and Alex Jones just flipped the switch, flipped the narrative around for Gladio. Instead of blaming the Marxists, you create a chaotic situation that's going to blow up in everybody's face. You take your own supporters and get them labeled as enemies. They just flipped the script on this thing. That's what we've been looking at. You take your own supporters and get them labeled as enemies. They just flipped the script on this thing. That's what we've been looking at. That's what I see when I see what Fox News is doing, and Tucker, and Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham.

So it's just amazing to me to see how we're going through exactly the same thing. Of course, Pachinik knows exactly what's happening with it. Here's the guy who went there after they kidnapped the Italian prime minister, Aldo Moro. About a decade later, they did an investigation in Italy. Zero coverage in the U.S. But what they found was that Kissinger and his henchman, Steve Pchenik, Alex Jones' favorite commentator on the election, ordered the murder of Aldo Morrow. He was a leftist prime minister who had figured out what was going on. So the new obsession of these people is the 15 minute city.

And we're gonna talk about that when we return. Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. Hear, hear. It is however not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.

The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow, it will be something else. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 Liberty, it's your move. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Yeah, then it was the monopoly of tea, the monopolization of tea. Now it's going to be the monopolization of the sale of energy, of food, of everything they can think of. So I've got a comment here on Rockfin from Angus Mustang. And I tip, thank you very much, Angus.

He says, let the scientists, quote, unquote, and the others try to force climate change down our throats and set an example of rationing and starve themselves to death. Yes, exactly. Well, they believe that they're not going to be affected by this. They will find out that just like all these other people and all these other revolutions, that it will eventually come for them. Just as Robosphere eventually went to the guillotine.

The media's new obsession. This is coming out of Australia. This is a sub stack called Dystopian Down Under by Rebecca Barnett talking about how anything that criticizes a narrative is immediately dismissed as a conspiracy theory, and they're done, right? The Media's New Obsession, 15-minute conspiracy theories. She says they need to work on their poker face.

In recent years, conspiracy theories were once almost unheard of, have now spread like wildfire with a growing number of Australians now skeptical of things like vaccines, 5G, and election results, reports news.com.au. Under, she said, an advertising banner for Pfizer's latest COVID vaccine ambassador, Pink.

Her new album, Trust Fall, is presumably about the global decline of trust in media and government. Wow, isn't that amazing? You know, I remember when I was in high school and younger, all of the recording artists were anti-establishment. Now they're doing commercials for Pfizer, the real government. Anyway, 15-minute cities, also smart cities, really. The article says, there's simply a common sense way of attempting to boost livability for residents. You know, you've got all these different places where they're rolling it out big time.

Paris is the first place. Paris was the first place that they came up with a 15-minute idea where they formalized that concept. But of course, smart cities are something that came out of the UN and the world economic forfeiture, foreclosure people, if you will. But Paris, now you're seeing it in Melbourne, London, Edmonton, and Oxford. And also, I think, in Canterbury. It's also in Canterbury as well. Anyone who's ever faced a long and painful commute will immediately see the appeal of having the daily essentials at their

fingertips. Well, that's a very different thing. I mean, when anybody looks for a place to live, whether you're buying a home or renting an apartment, you always look at all the amenities that are around there. And that's one of the things that they always tell you on realtor.com, for example. And that's a very different thing than saying, but you can't go anywhere else. That's what the 15-minute cities are. They go from 5 to 10 to 15, in some cases 20-minute cities, depending on how densely packed the city is. But the reality that's here and the thing that people are having a problem with

is not amenities. That's the way it's being spun by the mainstream media. Oh, these are just a bunch of paranoid conspiracy theorists who don't know. Yeah, they're angry about the conspiracy to keep them from traveling to other areas other than their immediate little village that's been created for them. They said gullible Australians who cannot appreciate common sense or convenience have been, quote-unquote, suckered into these, quote, dangerous conspiracies. These, quote, unhinged conspiracy theorists actually believe that smart cities are, quote, part of a secret plan by global elites to restrict people's freedom and movements. I don't think it's a secret plan. They're to restrict people's freedom and movements. I don't think it's a secret plan.

They're publicly talking about it. You're the ones that are trying to keep it secret from the public. But it's not a secret plan. They brag about it. Again, smart cities for dumb slaves. That's what this is really about. Anytime you see something that's smart anymore, you have to better understand that it's all about surveillance and control.

That's why they call it smart. It's got, it's got some kind of a CPU or microprocessor is going to be watching and reporting everything that you're doing. And then eventually it'll shut down anything that it doesn't like you doing. So I just have to say, if there is no force, if there's no coercion, why are people destroying the bear cage?

Remember this that I showed you a couple of weeks ago in Oxford. In the dead of night, a hooded figure removes a base plate for a bonnard, then pour cement into the hole. The aim, to make it hard to install a new one. This footage, obtained exclusively by ITV Meridian, is one of hundreds of incidents of vandalism in Oxford's local traffic neighbourhoods. Those removing the barriers often don't even wait for the cover of night now new figures show just how much this kind of activity is costing delivery drivers some filmed flouting the rules

condone it but i can understand it because they're not listening to us and that's where the anger's coming in you know that and people being stuck in traffic. There was no democracy in Oxford. Once on vandalism or a form of civil disobedience. They're not listening to us. Of course they're not. They're stakeholders. You're not. You don't have a stake in any of this.

You're not holding any of the cards. They hold all the cards. This is multinational corporate governance. They don't really care. The elections and the government structures are there just to make you happy, to give you a sense of control. It's as phony as the elections in the prisoner's village. It makes absolutely no difference what you do with it. I still have,

you know, I may sound cynical, but I still have a lot of optimism about local elections. But I think that that's, there's indications that besides the usual corruption, these voting machines are going to allow them to rig everything from top to bottom and everything from one side of the country to the other they have to go it's just that simple all this stuff about dominion and again fox news is not pushing back against dominion on just the general terms of um you know electronic voting machine. That's what they should have talked about. This is not simply the problem of one company. And that was a part of the inaccurate, distracting lie that was easily discredited,

that was the centerpiece of what Trump and the people supporting him were telling everybody. Oh, it's Dominion, right? No, it's all of them. It's Hart, it's's Dominion right no it's all of them this heart is ESS and it's all of these companies get rid of all electronic voting machines if they aren't corrupt from the inside they're easily hacked from the outside and we've seen that over and over again I've talked about that for years I talked about it before the 2016 elections a

matter of fact anyway for the past three years, writes Dystopian Down Under, for the past three years, mainstream media has been completely obsessed with conspiracy theories without irony. I would say that's without hypocrisy, because irony is not intentional. Hypocrisy

is. That's the difference between the two. Anyway, while mainstream media has relentlessly and self-consciously published the most outlandish and demonstrably false theories, while they do that, they call everybody else conspiracy theorists. While they have locked

down the world, they call us conspiracy theorists. You know, and fear, they call us paranoid when they've done that. They've uniformly defamed and insulted anybody who's skeptical of their campaigns. You're labeled a conspiracy theorist. You're labeled stupid, unhinged, selfish, and so on.

Right-wing extremists. Of course, that covers all of that. And so the mainstream media, whether you're talking about Australia or talking about the U.S., they use the same tactics because, again, this is a global takeover. They've all got the same plan, the same goal. Globally, the same thing is happening in every country. The 15-minute cities to go ahead and the will of the people be damned, she writes. And that's exactly what is happening. Again, in Oxford, the Heritage Party leader there, David Curtin, says that the majority of the residents do not want it.

Do they care? No. That the council intends to go ahead with the plans regardless of the will of the people, he said. You know, it's a Heritage Party. I think that's a good name for it. If I was going to start a new party today, what I would call it would be the Freedom and Dignity Party because I put it in direct opposition to B.F. Skinner, who said we need to be beyond freedom and dignity. What they seek to do is to treat us as animals, mere accidents of evolution, not created in

the image of God. That's why they take away your dignity. And then when they take away your dignity, they can take away your freedom. And we have to, that is the fundamental lie behind all of this. But the guy who's there with the Heritage Party there in Oxford says they're making a mockery of democracy. Well, that's what it's become.

It's become, democracy has become de-mockery. And that's exactly where we are at this point in time. It is a mockery of a systems of self-government that we have. And a good part of it is the elections and the ballots and the rest of the stuff. We only have a global corporate governance that openly mocks us. And then if we happen to talk about what they're mocking us about then they're lackeys in the media say you're just a paranoid conspiracy theorist even though they put out

publicly stated their plans of slavery for us. As a matter of fact, they said in Oxford, they had a large number of people show up for a scheduled meeting, about two hours, carrying homemade placards against this stuff. They said it was truly an eclectic mix of tweed jackets juxtaposed against gray baggy trackies and edgy high tops contrasted to athletic shoes. So it's a cross section. I guess they thought they could get away with it. But even in a university town, liberal university town, that is accustomed to all kinds of arbitrary control,

the people had enough there in Oxford. Can they or will they do anything about it, though? That is the question. We'll be right back. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.

Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com. That's a website. Yeah, that's a website. You're going to need to go to the website because we're being cut off on social media so much that you won't see it recommended on social media. Let's talk a little bit, though, about, I know that Tony Ardovin and Don Jeffries and Billy Ray Valentine talked about this extensively yesterday and did a great job. I just want to give you my take on it from having seen some of this stuff from the inside, the same kind of corruption.

The Dominion lawsuit, of course, as this is going back and forth, the Dominion lawyers put out as part of a motion to the judge, they used that to leak some of the testimony that had already been collected. And to put it, as the Fox News lawyers are saying, to put that there out of context. But I think what you see there is fairly damning. Dominion Voting Systems has a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News. Again, it's ridiculous. I don't know the company's worth that much ever. But what brought this on was to focus on one or two companies.

The other one was Smartmatic. I've talked about Smartmatic as a good example of the genesis of this whole thing. Smartmatic was one of the first and the biggest. Of course, they've changed management many, many times now. They're no longer controlled by the people in Venezuela. You have these mergers and purchases and things like that. But Smartmatic was originally created by a couple of friends of Hugo Chavez, and they made sure that he won elections.

And it's a matter of historical fact that Smartmatic has been accused of rigging elections in Brazil, in the Philippines, and in multiple Mexican provinces. No question about that. Those are allegations and hearings that have been had and public hearings. As a matter of fact, if you look at one of the Brazilian elections, it was after this Marxist criminal who's in there now, Lula, went to jail for a while. After he went to jail, the person who replaced him, the woman,

I can't remember her name, she was very unpopular. The day before the election, she showed up at a football match, what we call soccer here. Big crowd, somewhere between 60,000, 100,000 people booed her off the stage. She was incredibly unpopular by any measure. And the next day or over the weekend as they're having the voting, she is losing by a significant amount. And then all of the election machines went down. And then when they came back, she had reversed positions. And she was winning with about the same kind of large margin, she had reversed positions and she was winning

with about the same kind of large margin that she had been losing before. So, uh, that along with, especially a high profile case in the Philippines, this is why I was talking about it before the 2016 election. And one of the reasons I was talking about it before the 2016 election was because the Republican party in Utah had brought that company in to run their primaries for the party. And I said at the time, I said, look, they may be using this to try to ensure that Trump does not get in, because remember, the Utah Republican Party there with Romney

and Evan Mullins, this former CIA guy, they were trying to pull everything they could to block Trump. And I just thought that Smartmatic was part of it. And I said, well, you know, the 2020 election is going to be a major hacking fest because nobody wants to get rid of these electronic voting machines. I talked for years about how every year they have a Black Hat conference and DEF CON in Las Vegas in August. Of course, they didn't have it last couple of years conveniently for them. But they would do things like set up a replica of a State Board of Elections website,

and they'd have teenagers in high school and under come in and hack it. And it wasn't whether or not they could hack it, but they were competing to see who could do it the quickest. It's a joke. The whole electronic voting machine, the whole, you know, collection on the web of all these votes, it's all a joke, folks. It's a mirage. And this isn't about Dominion or even Smartmatic.

It's about the entire system. You've got to go back to paper ballots and human observers if you want to have a legitimate election. And you've got to open up the ballot and you've got to open up the debates. It's just that simple. It's not rocket science. Rocket science is how they steal things from you. They create these incredibly complex technological systems that they control,

they can hack. We need to go back to basics, watching these people and hand-counted votes. I know they've had this type of stuff around for a very long time. As soon as they put in even mechanical voting machines. In Chicago, you had people who were taking, you know, had a bunch of voting machines in the back of their car or something like that. So this is something that has been around for a very long time in many different ways, but it's been put on steroids now and it's been put on steroids now, and it's been escalated with the latest advances in technology.

This is high-tech theft now. But one of the things that came out in this deposition is the role of Paul Ryan, Romney's vice presidential candidate, former House Speaker Paul Ryan, who blocked all real reform of the agenda. He made sure that he cemented in the agendas that the Democrats had put in, whether you're talking about the border or anything else. We're talking about Obamacare, the border, all these things that were hot-button issues

that were supposed to define the difference between Republicans and Democrats, Paul Ryan made sure that what the Democrats had done under Obama stayed in place. And that was the role of Mitt Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, to make sure in 2012 that regardless of which side won, we were going to get Obamacare or Romneycare, which was the same thing as Obamacare. Mitt Romney had put that together in Massachusetts where he was governor with Ted Kennedy, and it worked exactly the same as Obamacare. So, you know, they have these elections where you go back to the 1992 election where it's

Clinton and George H.W. Bush. Both of them were there to make sure that NAFTA came in. And when you had Ross Perot come in to point out that you don't want to have NAFTA, that's when the gloves came off for him, right? So, you know, you look at that, we're going to have NAFTA one way or the other. We're going to have Obamacare or Romneycare, we don't really care, but it's going to be the same thing, one way or the other.

That was the role of Paul Ryan. Well, this guy is now on the board of directors of Fox News, and he's got a lot of editorial control. Does it start to make sense now for what Fox News has become? You look at the Pfizer commercials, you know, no question about who pays them. Good Morning America is brought to you by by just good morning America but all of them by Pfizer Anderson Cooper threes yeah not just CNN but Fox News as well so we know who's paying them and now we know who is controlling editorial content as well as the board of directors

Paul Ryan figuring very prominently in this deposition in terms of going back and forth with Rupert Murdoch, the CEO, talking about what the opinion people, I mean, that's what people tuned into Fox News for. They could get the same Shepard Smith's controlled news. They could get the same stuff exactly fed to them at CNN. As a matter of fact, I don't know which network he went to, whether it's CNN or MSNBC, but he's interchangeable. He's just a widget. He could be anywhere. All that stuff is essentially the same.

And it's controlled. What they talk about is controlled, and the way they talk about it is controlled. But if you want to get an opinion, that's what people tune in to Fox News for. And yet, this is what we found from the opinion people. According to the lawsuit, the board also discussed the, quote, future of cable and streaming services. They said, according to the lawsuit, they talked about, quote, super serve and expand our loyal audience. That was one of the headlines of what they want to do. So they want to serve the audience, what the audience wants to hear you see

as we were looking at the twitter files that were put out by matt taibi i think he focused on directly he said look this is what news has become and you can see it you can see how you know cnn and msnbc they get all re they get all democrat politicians who come on, and they're so deferential to them and agreeable to them. And Fox News does the same thing with all Republicans. And so, as Matt Taibbi said, this has all become, it's not so much news or even their opinions as it is seeking out a demographic. And that's exactly what this is about. Super serve and expand our loyal audience and to keep them in the Fox News ecosystem. And that means that you don't offend Trump. So according to the lawsuit, he confirmed that the inflection point was not just one day, said Paul Ryan.

It was the whole time between the post-election November-December timeframe. He says we're in a big inflection point. Well, yeah, he said Ryan knew that these conspiracy theories were baseless, they said. So, you know, the elections, frankly, are baseless because of the way they're operating them. In the back and forth, Rupert Murdoch said that Hannity was, quote, privately disgusted, unquote, by Trump. But he was, quote, scared to lose viewers. That is in the new court filing.

So as I said, the Dominion lawyers are putting out this stuff, and I would imagine that that is, you know, I don't know what kind of a context you would put that into to explain that away. Say he's privately disgusted by Trump. You know, I don't think he's talking about one particular incident there because this is what I've seen. And this is what disgusts me about the media. You know, I know these guys know what Trump is like. They know what he's like. They know what his policies are doing and are going to do. They know what

he's like behind the scenes. I've seen this with Alex Jones. I've seen it with Roger Stone. How many times have they gone off of the Trump wagon only to return after their base gets angry with them? They're not mending the fences with Trump. They're mending the fences with their bases. I don't even know where they are right now. I guess they're back on. I mean, you remember right after January the 6th, it was recorded by the guy who was doing a documentary film with Roger Stone. And he was, I've never seen,

I've seen Roger Stone be pretty angry about stuff. But I mean, you know, there's absolutely no question about his hatred and vilification of Trump at that point. It was intense. It was visceral. I've seen the same thing from Alex. I've seen it privately many, many times. I've seen it publicly. And you have too, many, many times.

His rants against Trump. I said, I'm done. If he doesn't come out against this vaccine in 30 days, I'm done. Well, he's 30 days. Trump doesn't do anything. Alex is back on the bandwagon for trump uh why because they will lie to you so that you follow them and give them money it's just that simple i think it's disgusting frankly this kind of hypocrisy and this kind of you know pied piper journalism really disgusts me uh and they they don't even have an understanding of where they're going the filing discussed that

rupert murdoch and scott the ceo of fox news discussed the day before the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol, having Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingram issuing a joint statement declaring Biden had won and putting an end to the election conspiracy theories. This is coming from left-wing mediaite. That's why they call it the January 6th attack. It was a false flag attack. It was agent provocateurs. It was destined to fail.

And even more importantly, it was destined to never make a difference in a positive way. It had gone all of that time, all of that money, and not a single thing had been done to do even the slightest reform. Not even a reform of the newly applied rigging rules that had happened in Georgia. What did Trump do? Did he work with these guys to get rid of this, um, um, election where you're

going to have, um, you know, the, the ballot harvesting, no, they did it exactly the same way and turned the Senate over to the Democrats. And then it happened the day before this January January the 5th, on that Tuesday. We had already had an election where they ran it under the same Trump rules, same Trump lockdown rules. The Georgia Republican Party with Kemp and all the rest of these people didn't change anything. Trump didn't even try to get them to change anything for that. And so as a result, they missed all the deadlines to get anything done, to talk to state legislatures.

They couldn't get the crooked courts to even listen to the case. But they missed all the deadlines. That's why I said this is a pointless exercise at this point. So all of that stuff was baked in. They did absolutely nothing to save the Senate from Democrat control. And then the next day, you have January the 6th. So Scott told Rupert, they said, privately, they're all there, meaning Tucker, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram.

Privately, they are all there, he said, quote, unquote. But, quote, we need to be careful about using the shows and pissing off the viewers. That's all they care about. They don't care about the country. They don't care about Trump. They don't like Trump. They don't like the country. They want your money.

They want you to follow them, buy their products, take the Pfizer drugs. We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the David Knight show well I think it's kind of interesting that people are so upset with Apple because they put in a feature, a new feature, into the latest operating system. And of course, they push the updates on everybody relentlessly. Unlike the Microsoft thing, they don't force you to get an update update but they relentlessly hector you about it and so this is a feature that's part of ios 16.1 called clean energy charging it will only charge devices when lower carbon emission electricity on the grid is available and so this feature turned on, it looks at some evaluation software somewhere. And I guess the reality is that maybe if they're looking at your electrical generation for the grid in your area, and if maybe they've got a lot of solar, then maybe they'll let you charge your phone during the day, but then not at night or

charge it at a very very slow level and it's getting a lot of people very upset now this is not something that you have to do you can turn this off in your power settings but if you update to their system what it does is it makes this turns this on by default. And so it has really gotten a lot of people upset about it. But the reality is, you know, whether whatever kind of smartphone you buy, whether you're getting it from Google or you're getting it from Apple operating systems, they're both evil. They're both big brother devices. I've said for the longest time, it came out.

It was when we had the Snowden leaks. One of the NSA series of slides that was a part of those leaks was only reported in Germany. Der Spiegel ran the slides, but nobody else did. And so I've talked about this a great deal. And what it did was it showed three slides talking about the iPhone. And the first one said, who would have thought this is coming from the NSA? They said, who would have thought in 1984, and they show the 1984 Mac Super Bowl commercial. Next one is that this would be Big Brother. And it shows Steve Jobs

holding up an iPhone. And the third slide shows people lined up at the Apple store. And it says, and that the zombies would line up to pay for it themselves. That's the NSA's picture of you, how they characterize you. Who would have thought that Apple would have put out Big Brother and that the zombies would have paid for their Big Brother device themselves. So here we are. You want to charge your phone? Well, I don't think that the power grid in your area is green enough,

so we're not going to let you charge your phone. While Apple is forcefully trying to reduce the carbon footprint of iPhone users to fight climate change, don't bring up the sobering reality about all the carbon emissions that it takes to mine lithium and other rare earth metals for Apple products. Also, don't bring up company executives such as Tim Cook who fly on private jets everywhere they want to go. And of course, don't bring up the slavery.

It's not just the lithium, but it's also the cobalt mines. Yeah, don't talk about any of that stuff. And don't talk about the fact that the NSA is using energy on your phone to spy on you and to store everything that they scrape about you. So users are very upset about this. Reports of carbon emissions from local power plants, they use that as information to determine if and when the phone can recharge. It is activated by default.

You can get rid of it, but just having it on there got a lot of people upset. In Washington State, they're now imposing new climate policy, and gasoline prices are already skyrocketing. They're already doing cap-and-trade in California, and now they're doing it in Washington state. One of the reasons that gas is not as expensive in Washington state is that they have not imposed customized blends of gasoline as they have in California. But the cost has surged 40 cents per gallon since the new year. A new law designed to penalize greenhouse gas emissions went into effect at the beginning

of the year. Washington businesses that produce more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year will either need to purchase allowances from the state's Department of Ecology at quarterly auctions, or they'll have to trade with him with another business later. This is known as cap and trade, where the traders, and you spell that T-R-A-I-T-O-R-S, where the traders cap your energy use, but don't have any limit on how much they can charge you for anything.

Since the law was implemented, the cost of gas in Washington state has skyrocketed from nearly $3.70 to $4.10. The final cost of the allowances will be announced March 7th and determined by the result of the state's first auction hosted Tuesday. The state's legislature anticipates that the allowance program will generate more than $1.7 billion through 2024, which will then be reinvested into efforts to reduce greenhouse gases. Let me translate that for you. They're going to rob consumers of another $1.7 billion, and then they're going to take that money and hand it out to their friends who are participating in this greenwashing cash for fear plan.

That's what this is really about. You know, when you look at this, and you look at all these cap and trade things and the carbon credits and all the rest of this stuff, as I've said for the longest time, this has been forever. It has been a kind of religion. And these things are like indulgences. Let me pay you for the sin of using energy. Well, who do you pay?

Who am I supposed to pay? I have to purchase these allowances. I have to pay the state of Washington to be able to send and use energy. Look, it's time that we overthrow. We need a reformation of this. That was one of the key sticking points in Germany. They were coming in and said, well, you know, if it's a holy day, you're not going to be able to open your business. And all of a sudden, the holy days got so extensive

that unless you were open on a holy day, you couldn't be open at all. That's where we get the term holidays, right? If it's going to be a holy day, you can't operate. However, if as a business you want to give us some cash, we'll let you remain open. How is that any different from this? It's not. It's fundamentally the same thing.

This is a corrupt pagan religion, and now it comes complete with indulgences that you buy from the state that is pushing it to you. And they're going to reinvest this, they tell you. Oh, great, you're going to reinvest it. It means you're going to hand it out to your pals. Except for California, the average price of gas in Washington is more than 27 cents higher than the rest of the West Coast. The average price of a gallon of gas in California, which also has a

cap-and-trade law, is more than $4.58. So while the price under this indulgence system, while the price of gasoline in Washington has gone up by 40 cents per gallon, it is still 48 cents per gallon more expensive in California because they've got cap and trade and they've got custom blends. You've got to go to a barista to get your gasoline blends in California. I'll have whatever Newsom is having. That's what I'll have whatever Newsom is having. That's what I'll take. The Washington legislature has never had the opportunity to invest this amount of money in climate and clean energy.

Is that a Washington state director for non-profit energy transition advocacy group, right? Never had this much money to throw around to their friends. It's just so hopelessly corrupt, isn't it? So America wants to electrify everything. We want everything running off the grid because everything must be centrally controlled so they can surveil whatever we're using, right? In terms of energy.

And the problem is, is that we don't have enough minerals, you know, we got limitations of lithium and cobalt and other things like that. And I'm going to talk right after this about what is happening with the coming lithium wars with China. This is one of the big reasons why they're making China, uh, you know, escalating the tensions. And of course, there's always been tensions with China. And China has been the handpicked successor to the United States as global leader

by the globalists for quite some time. And so this has been there. But again, looking beyond that agenda, the fact there's going to be this competition for the minerals that are going to be necessary for this battery-operated yeah we have climate change batteries not included uh so minerals we need we need to have more grid capacity except they're shutting down grid capacity if everybody's going to be running all their transportation off of the grid using

battery operated evs using uh electric burn. No other things are going to be allowed if they're going to use a mandate that you heat your home that way. We don't have the grid capacity for that. We don't have the charging stations for that. We don't have the consumer cash to pay for all this stuff either because all this stuff is more expensive. Or we have to go out and buy things that we don't need because the current things that we have that are working just fine, thank you, are not going to be allowed. So we don't have the minerals. We don't have the grid capacity. We don't have the charging stations. We don't have the consumer cash. Now it turns out we don't have enough trained electricians to build it either. Not a problem. They'll just tell us, hey, you know,

we had an emergency. We had to shut everything down. We had to do whatever we could, but, you know, sorry it all went wrong. Sorry you lost everything. That was never our intention. We did our best. You know, we meant well. It was an emergency, and we just didn't have time to test any of this stuff. We didn't have time to develop something that's going to work. We just got to get rid of what you've got now. Right. Got to lock you down. And so now America doesn't have enough electricians.

This is coming from the wall street journal. They're needed to install the new electric car chargers to install the new mandated EPUBs and the new mandated electric ranges and the new new mandated electric this and electric that, but we don't have them. Just like we don't have the electricity to provide for all this stuff. I mean, we would have to be growing the... You see anybody growing power generation in your area? I don't. As a matter of fact, most areas, what they're doing is they're shutting down

existing power plants that work just fine because of all this unicorn fart nonsense. Electricians say they're booked several months out. They're struggling to find enough workers to keep up with demand, and so wages are going up. Prices are going up. They're worried that they won't be able to keep up as government climate incentives kick in. Incentives, yes. We will incentivize it. We will bribe you to do this. Later on, they'll blackmail us. A climate solution that many worry is going to actually trigger a war. In this, they're talking about geoengineering, and I've talked about this for years.

All the people who said geoengineering, that's just a conspiracy theory, doesn't exist. Well, why do we have annual conventions on geoengineering theory? And why have we had them for decades? And why did we have a weather treaty back in the 1970s after Vietnam? Why did they hand a guy who was manipulating the weather in Vietnam,

why did they give him an award after the Vietnam War? Well, there's a lot of stuff to show this has been happening. I remember it was about eight years ago. I talked about one of the geoengineering conferences that they had. My favorite paper out of it was one that said, who gets to set the thermostat? You typically see this with, your wife typically wants it warmer than you do.

You want it cooler. We don't typically have a war over that, but when you have some northerly countries like Russia I imagine they'd be just fine to set the thermostat higher if they could do that and they say they can other countries would not want that and vice versa so who gets to set the thermostat will the thermostat Wars turn into thermonuclear wars? Well, that's the point of this article from the Washington Post.

They said it sounds like something out of science fiction. Because, you know, the Washington Post and mainstream media has been telling us for a long time, the longest time, that geoengineering doesn't exist. There's not any, nobody's doing any geoengineering at all. A country suffering from heat, from flooding, or from crop failures decides on its own to send out a fleet of aircraft to spray a fine sun-blocking mist into the Earth's atmosphere,

reducing temperatures, providing relief to parched populations. Other countries view it as a threat to their own citizens, and they ready a military response. Again, you had Bill Gates funding these things. They say, well, they're experiments and so forth. But other people have, as they noticed, these chemtrails. They call them chemtrails because they can find the residue on the ground where it's happened.

Call them chemtrails because they can find the residue on the ground where it's happened. Call them chemtrails because they're persistent contrails. And again, I'll mention that SpiderAlert was an application that would allow you, if you saw a cross-hatching of a lot of persistent contrails above you, you could take a picture of it, you could report it. And they started correlating these things together. And they noticed that there was an increase in temperature where there would be these cross hatching things. They wanted to do this. So they could send the data to congressmen who subsequently

either didn't care, or they were already bought off into the agenda. So the Washington post says geoengineering is theoretically possible. That's where we are right now. They're admitting now that it is theoretically possible. They're still thinking about it. The technique could weaken the sun's power across the globe. Well, what would that do? Oh, that would wreak havoc upon our food supply.

Not just above whichever country they decided to deploy. When you stop and think about this, what are the essentials to life? Well, everything depends on plants growing, right? If you are a carnivore, you eat the things that eat plants. Or you can eat the plants yourself, but it all depends on plants. That's the base of our food supply system. They need sunlight and they need carbon dioxide.

And what are the people in charge trying to do? Well, they want to get rid of those things. And if they can't get rid of carbon dioxide quickly enough, they want to sequester it. They want to pump it into the ground so the plants can't get to it. They're trying to starve us, literally. So Washington Post says the White House

is in the process of developing a five-year plan. How about that? Just like the commies. The commies always had a five-year plan for everything. And so does the Biden administration. A five-year plan and a strategy for managing the technology at the behest of Congress, which mandated it last year. Of course, that was Pelosi's Congress.

Of course, you would expect they would do something like that. A favorite read among some of these people is a 2020 novel. It's called The Ministry for the Future. Sounds very well in. By Stanley Robinson, it envisions a near future in which, among other developments, India decides unilaterally to do solar geoengineering in defiance of a global ban after a heat wave kills 20 million of its citizens so you get the idea this is a favorite book they said of barack obama uh because and it it sells

this it posits this idea that uh everybody's dying from global warming right which we're seeing right now in California. Unbelievable amounts of snow, even in the hills of L.A. These people, I tell you. Yeah, it feeds that narrative. Here's the reality. Climate change isn't going to happen unless they geoengineer it. That's what real man-made climate change looks like. It's not you and your SUV. It's Bill Gates and the U.S. government and other governments

with their planes spewing stuff out. The technology necessary to hack the atmosphere is not that complicated. They said airplanes would spray sulfur into the sky at high altitude or anything. That's one of the reasons why you're seeing increases in barium in places where they're doing chemtrails, because they can put particles like barium and aluminum and things like that up in the atmosphere. And it reflects sunlight, darkens things. They know this works.

It can pretty much do anything. Volcanoes, large volcanoes. They mention the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines. But of course, probably even bigger than that was a Krakatoa. I remember they did a, when I was a kid, they did a movie Krakatoa east of Java or something like that.

And that was such a, you know, it was a disaster film, but that was such a big volcano that it created a little mini ice age that lasted for about a decade around the world. You can see that in the records in the UK as well. It said changes to the atmosphere would shift weather patterns and create droughts. A less intense sun could lower crop yields and lead to hunger. Of course it would. And that's by design. And by the way, you lower the CO2, it's going to reduce crop yields as well.

There are concerns that temperatures could build outside the sulfur dioxide layer. There's fears that if the spraying stopped, it could unleash a catastrophic heat wave across the world. You see, the experts don't really know. The experts have got models, and the models are telling them different things. And nobody's tested any of this stuff. It is untestable, just like all of the climate MacGuffin. It's all untested and untestable. They have no basis for this. But let's talk about the lithium wars. You know, we've had, if you go back, interesting, you know, we talked had, um, if you go back interesting, um, you know, we talked last week or actually a Monday,

it seemed like a week ago. So much stuff has happened the last couple of days, all this power and internet outage. But, um, we talked about the fact that there's now a move afoot to edit in Fleming's James Bond novels, uh,

not because of, um, sexism or things like that, but because of evidently racism. I don't know. I mean, I've only looked at two Bond novels, but they weren't, you know, they didn't have the kind of content that Hollywood has put into them.

But anyway, when we talk about, I got off on a tangent here, But anyway, when we talk about, got off on a tangent here and I forgot where I was going with it, but we'll get back to it here. Let's talk about the battle for lithium. I know why I was talking about it. I was going to say, the person that is widely regarded as the model for Ian Fleming, James Bond, was a guy named Sigmund Reilly.

And I've talked about this before in light of the way for Ian Fleming, James Bond, was a guy named Sigmund Reilly. And I've talked about this before in light of the way that these intelligence agencies entrap people. They create their opposition, and that was the way that they trapped this master spy, Sigmund Reilly. The Russians' Secret Service, Felix Dzerzhinsky and the Cheka created this thing, the Trust, they called it. And it was essentially a honeypot to grab all the people who were in exile who were in opposition to the Bolsheviks. And so, you know, they lavished a lot of money on it. And these people would come in and they would contribute money to this organization and then they would plan what they wanted to do to overthrow

the bolsheviks and all the rest of this stuff and that's how they entrapped and killed the guy who was the model for james bond sigmund riley and it's an instructive lesson for us in the real world of how this operates but if you read the novel and there was an excellent Also an excellent series that was done by somebody that had Sam Neill remember Sam Neill. He was in Jurassic Park and many many other things but when he's much younger he played the role of Sigmund Reilly and a series that had about six different episodes or something in it and It was not just the overthrow of the Bolsheviks,

but he was also involved in the early days of oil and other things like that in terms of helping the British get control of oil in the Middle East. He was also involved in the military-industrial complex and the British companies like Vickers selling their weapons to other countries. Same type of stuff we're dealing with today. But it was the early, early part of the 20th century. At the time, you had most of the ships were still running on coal. They realized that oil was going to be more effective for them. So they were making a strategic military move in order to secure supplies

and to have control of energy by getting control of oil. And we've seen most of the latter part of the 20th century has been wars over oil. And so now if we go into this new economy that's going to be based on batteries, of course, the battle is going to be for lithium. So what is happening with lithium? As this article from a political analyst on RT says, lithium is the essential mineral for these renewable energy, I'll say, scams. It will be to the 21st century what coal was to the previous two centuries, coal and oil. A pillar for the fossil fuel-free economy. The price of lithium has surged by 500% over the past two years. And of course, to get to a fossil fuel-free economy is totally unnecessary.

But that's where they're pushing. And I'll just say this. Those of us with a will to survive and the countries with a will to survive will not participate in this scam. China's not participating in it. India's not participating in it. We're participating in it because the West is suicidal and because our

leaders have betrayed us. China has become the focus of the Biden administration's efforts to regain the lead in the industry. Again, this is another key area where we're competing with them. And if you understand what is, since lithium is the basis for this economy, we are creating an economy that puts China in charge. The two countries are at odds with each other over who can locate and exploit lithium deposits around the planet. Whoever controls the supply chain will dominate the industry and the world, right? China has a head start possessing both a significant amount of lithium and the ability to mine it. It is number six in the world for overall lithium resources,

has 5 million tons and 1.5 tons are mineable. The U.S. has more lithium. We have 9 million tons to China's 5 million tons, but our current mineable reserves stand at only 750,000 tons instead of 1.5 million tons. We got half the mineable area that they do. We have Australia that is on our side, we could say, says this article in RT. With its 5.7 million tons of lithium reserves, it could help to shift the balance in the U.S.'s favor. That is, unless China decides that they want to take Australia. But anyway, it seems that U.S. is losing its grip on a region

that is rich in lithium deposits and also one that Washington has dominated for decades, which is Central and South America. Latin America alone possesses 56% of the world's lithium deposits, the known ones. And let me just throw in here as another aside, when you go back and you look at the history of oil, John D. Rockefeller got his start as the Civil War began. He bought his way out. He paid somebody to serve in his place.

So he didn't have to go fight and die. And then he, um, people were looking for an alternative to turpentine, which had come out of the south distilled out of pine trees and things like that. And that supply was cut off. That's when they started looking for oil. And at the time, uh, they didn't have any sophisticated exploration stuff we're talking about the 1860s there's no sophisticated exploration there was no sophisticated refinement or anything like that it was really more like the beverly hillbillies you

know up from the ground come a bubbling crude and so he decided that he'd become a millionaire by latching on to that and the only place where they knew there was any oil because it came out of the ground like a bubbling crude was in Pennsylvania. And so there were all these essentially mom-and-pop refiners all over the place that were just getting the oil that was bubbling up out of the ground and refining it into oil that could be used to replace

turpentine and things like that, you know, for lamps and for many, for industrial uses and stuff. And what John D. Rockefeller did was he just started buying them up, you know, just started creating a monopoly by buying up all these mom and pop refiners. And he thought he had it. He thought he had cornered the world's supply of oil by doing that in Pennsylvania. And you can still see that in the title. You've got Quaker State, you've got Pennzoil, a lot of things like that. But then what happened was they found oil in Texas. Uh-oh, now the monopoly is threatened. And so what he did was he started setting up Standard Oil of Ohio so that he could put refineries there. And he wasn't interested in trying to explore and find oil. That's a lot of risk.

He focused on refining it because there's no risk on that. Let other people take the risk, he'd take the profits. And so he set up Standard Oil of Ohio. People would ship the oil up there. And he essentially take the profits. And so he set up Standard Oil of Ohio. People would ship the oil up there, and he essentially did the same thing there and kind of cornered the market there. Then they found oil in Saudi Arabia. He had the idea. The bottom line is that right now we're talking about lithium. I think you'll be surprised how many different places lithium exists. But nevertheless, even though we kept finding new sources of oil, we kept having wars over oil throughout the 20th century.

The same thing will happen with lithium. Beijing has sought to invest in many lithium ventures across America. The U.S. has responded, Central and South America. The U.S. has responded by leveraging its political power there. They are able in Mexico and Canada to do that because of the NAFTA, U.S., MCA type of agreements. But haven't been too successful in doing this throughout Central and South America. Because you look at Bolivia, not at all friendly to the U.S.,

very left-leaning, and they are one of the biggest sources of this lithium. But just take a look at the recent moves of China. The last thing I'll say about this, lithium industry is now reeling after China has shuttered 10% of the global supply. Now, why are they doing this? Well, the cover story, I believe, I believe it's a cover story. The cover story is that China has just realized that the area where they're getting their lithium,

it's a province that's known as China's lithium capital, they've just realized that, hey, they're not following any regulatory, environmental regulatory rules there. And we're going to just have to shut it down for now. Oh, really? You want me to believe that China is concerned about environmental regulations? They're allowed, they've got a carve-out for them,

for these coal power plants and all the rest of these things. They can build as many coal plants, and they are, as they wish, and build them as cheap and dirty as they wish. And they do the same thing with refineries. You take a look at the air quality in places like Beijing, but especially Wuhan. That was one of the things, as this was all beginning, people were saying, look at the air quality in places like Beijing, but especially Wuhan. That was one of the things, as this was all beginning, people were saying,

look at the air in Wuhan. You can basically cut it with a knife. Is that what we're seeing? This is respiratory illness. Are we seeing that instead of some virus or something? There's a chance that's possible. But still, when you look at their total disregard for air pollution, for any other kind of pollution, I'm not buying this at all. I think what this is, this is another central party,

Chinese Communist Party move to exert economic control and chaos just like the Shanghai lockdowns were. There was no reason for them to do those kind of Shanghai lockdowns and to keep them going as long as they did. That was to show the people in Shanghai who was boss. And it was also to play havoc with the supply chains. That's what this is about as well. I guarantee you that's what this is about.

Just take a look at what China does and how they just could not care less about any kind of pollution. They're not worried about the environment. The crackdown follows a local lithium frenzy over the past year as miners raced to feed rampant demand for the battery material. And now they're grappling with a close-up inspection by environmental officials sent from Beijing. Same kind of close-up inspections that they did over all the COVID tests and all the rest of the stuff. The sudden probe has injected a big dose of uncertainty

into a lithium market that has seen prices drop. So the lithium market was going down. China's got a lot of lithium to sell. Would they like to sell at a low price or a high price well let's sell it at a high price so let's crack down on the supply let's artificially restrict the supply it's just that simple i think they have in that area they've been ordered to stop they said that depending bloomberg says depending on who the analysts are, they estimate this goes between 8% and 13% of the global supply of lithium, that the Chinese can just turn off like that.

So, you know, they take an average of that 10% or so. Due to the ongoing probe, all mining, aside from those owned by a state-owned company. Oh, well, there you go. Another indication. Not only do we know from their history that Chinese don't give a whit about the environment or about climate change or any of the rest of this stuff, we also see that they've shut down everybody except themselves.

The state-run lithium mining operation is allowed to continue. They will continue and take advantage of the higher prices that the faux environmental shutdown has created. So everybody else's operation has been suspended except for the Chinese state-run one. Now, according to the calculations, as I said, a month-long mining halt there would reduce lithium output by an amount that is equivalent to about 13% of the world's total. At present, the market speculation is that the probe may stop after two sessions in China next month.

See? So there's going to be a political meeting. They will decide if they want to care about the environment at that point in time, or if they would like to keep making some more confiscatory profits. This is the situation that Biden and all of our world leaders have thrown us into, to put us at the mercy of this Chinese communist government. They can lock down the world supply. You know, they make us dependent on them. We become dependent on them because they use slave labor.

They use piracy of intellectual property. They use currency manipulation, all that in the China price. And then with the China price, domestic production cannot compete with China, so China gets all the production. Then China shuts down the production of many things in Shanghai.

And of course, Shanghai was a major hub of transporting out anything that was made in the rest of China. They're weaponizing the economy against us. China has been put in that place. And what they're doing now with this EV-based economy is putting all that on steroids. We'll be right back. ¶¶ Analyzing the Globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. Let's talk a little bit about free speech and about the mob shutting people down.

And I said before, I said this is somebody, that music that you just heard there. I don't know if I've mentioned this many times before. Maybe new listeners don't understand it. I do the music that we use here because one of the easiest ways for them to take you down is with a copyright strike. But I also enjoy doing it. I mean, that's my hobby. I've always enjoyed doing music. And now things have progressed to the stage that you can have an amazingly wide variety of instruments that you can play with a MIDI keyboard. Where you get those instruments, however, one of the places that I get them from is a company called Spitfire Audio out of the UK, one of my favorite providers.

They've got some great free stuff. They've got some great really cheap stuff. And of course, you know, they have some very expensive libraries as well. And now this cancel culture has hit them and one of the founders of this company has now been pushed out because of a tweet that he said about coming after the transgenders coming after children which is absolutely true but he's been pushed out because, especially in the entertainment industry, it is so heavily pushing the LGBT agenda that if you're going to have somebody who's been accused by the cancel mob of being transphobic, that could be a death sentence to even an established company like this so and what they do is they the way things have progressed now i remember when this first kind of at the very beginning of this electronic music and things like that you know we had a real renaissance in the early 70s of all kinds of new instruments

you had the fender roads electric piano you had the honor d6 clavinet. I had both of those. I played in bands. Then you had analog synthesizers. I had an ARP 2600, which was really interesting, but very, very primitive and limited compared to what you can do today because you had to have – you've seen the pictures of the Moog synthesizers. I think it's Moog. I never could remember if it was Moog or Moog synthesizers. I think it's Moog. I never could remember if it was Moog or Moog. But the ones that were done by Walter Carlos, who by the way I just thought of this. It was the first time I ever saw anybody have a sex

change operation. It was a guy, Walter Carlos, who did Switch on Bach and he did the soundtrack for Clockwork Orange and a bunch of other things. But Switch on Bach was absolute genius. And you see the pictures of it, and I think they had a guy in a powdered wig and a typical costume sitting in front of this massive panel of patch cords, and you've got cords being patched from one place to the other so it was kind of this additive process you get basic oscillators that would have basic sounds you might have a sine wave oscillator and a square wave oscillator and a um a you know a sawtooth

oscillator things like that and you could uh vary um the shape of those waveforms, especially the square and the sine wave and the sawtooth. And that would change the timbre of the sound. And you could get kind of quasi strings or quasi brass or things like that. And you could combine them in any way that you wanted to. And ring modulators and things like that you put into it. Anyway, there was that kind of additive analog synthesis. And so there was just really an explosion of technology hitting music.

And in the 1970s, you would hear it whether you were listening to pop music or you're listening to progressive rock. It didn't matter. I mean, it was everywhere, elements of it. And then towards the end of the 70s, I guess it was, or maybe the early 80s, you started having, and one of the first things that they did was they had a Mellotron, which was actually a recording of different instruments. So you would have a little, it was physical audio tape that was rolled up on a spool. And so if you would set the thing up to play a violin

and you load in all of the banks, a massive number of banks of these violins, for example, or strings, it wouldn't necessarily be violins. But, you know, throughout the whole range of your keyboard, you load in all, you have a different tape loop, spring-loaded tape loop on each of these things. And when you hit the key, you would get the attack of the instrument,

and then it would play it for a limited amount of time. You know, you might have, you might have 15, 20 seconds of that, and you did the end of the tape, right? And so it actually was pretty good at recording those things. Rick Wakeman had a Mellotron, one of the more, but a lot of people had them. I knew a guy who had a band. He was in a band, and they turned around Florida, and I was in a band and they turned around Florida and I was in a band

with him briefly, but he was, he was also an engineer and he had a Mellotron and it was everybody that had it talked about what an unbelievable nightmare was. There's a great clip on YouTube of Rick Wakeman joking about the Mellotron and how much he hated it. And so my friend Lee, actually, the guy who replaced Rick Wakeman in Yes was living in Switzerland, Pat Moritz, and he had a Mellotron.

He was having problems with it and and Lee got so good at fixing it that they sent him to Switzerland to fix his Mellotron anyway the the bottom line it was either that or else it was his mini Moog because Lee had modified his mini Moog so he could play two notes at a time instead of one and so it was either that or the melatonin but i think it was a melatonin but um anyway uh that's kind of the way things evolved and then all of a sudden it went digital and if you remember stevie wonder had an album called songs in the key of life and he had recorded on the keyboard things like you know birds and all

kinds of animal sounds, and you could play that, it plays keyboard and have all that stuff there. Well, over the many decades, and it took many decades to get the computer speed up to where it is now and to get the sampling up. And again, to make these things sound realistic, just like the Mellotron, you've got to have a good recording of the way the instrument is played. So if you've got strings, you might have different bowing techniques that they have in there. You'd have pizzicato and things like that. So, you know, it's a large palette of things that can be there, but you can make very realistic stuff. And a lot of people use this and use it only instead of

orchestras now to do video game soundtracks and things like that. And a lot of people use this and use it only instead of orchestras now to do video game soundtracks and things like that. And that's what Christian Hinson did. He's a BAFTA-nominated music composer. He's done music for things like Top Gear. And he's also done music for video games and things like that. But he was a co-founder of this company, just to give you an idea of what it is. And they're always trying to come up with interesting new sounds or libraries that are going to mimic maybe Hans Zimmer sound or going retro, going back to, who's the guy that was, who's the guy that was,

who's the one that did Hitchcock's stuff? Bernard, it's on the tip of my failing mind here. Anyway, they'd go back and get a particular sound. Or they would set up, record an orchestra in Heavy Roadads Studios where... Bernard Herrmann. Yes, thank you. Bernard Herrmann. Why can I not remember that?

How can I forget Bernard Herrmann? Psycho and all the rest of this stuff, right? He was an amazing composer. He did a lot of music for Twilight Zone as well. A lot of TV shows, early early days had really good quality production. Amazing composers like Bernard Herrmann. But they might want to get John Williams sound, so they'll record an orchestra in Abbey Road Studios or something like that and try to get the same types of, offer you some combinations that are frequently used by John Williams in his orchestration.

That's what they do. So Christian Henson, with that company Spitfire, had tweeted out back in September. He said, as a parent, I can no longer keep my mouth shut about this. I'm in full support of Glenner and J.K. Rowling. I don't know what Glenner was talking about, but he says, please look into this. If you have a young child,

it's in the post. If you have autistic children, it's probably already on your doormat. And he's British. So what he's saying, if you've got a young child, this is in the mail. It's on its way to you.

If you've got an autistic child, they're already doing it to you. And so he said that in a mail. It's on its way to you. If you've got an autistic child, they're already doing it to you. And so he said that in a comment about a YouTube video that somebody had put up talking about how they were coming after the kids, you know, to groom them, especially the autistic kids. So I saw that. It's like, good for him. But then trans activists came after him. They pressured Spitfire Audio to take action against him. They tried to walk the line. The CEO apologized and said, well, Henson will be taking a break.

He says his tweet has caused hurt among our community. Again, they're in the entertainment business. You're not going to do any movies today for official Hollywood if you don't have LGBT characters, especially T. And so this is why, you know, it's been a full-on war with J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series, because she defended women against this transgender insanity. And it is insanity.

So now he's come out and he says that he's stepping down. As an original founder, I'm deeply saddened that Spitfire has become embroiled in something it has no involvement with. They employ a large number of people from a diverse range of backgrounds, all of whom are united in their passion for music, sound, and composing. So today, I've decided to put them first and to step back from any involvement in Spitfire, including acting in any consulting capacity. So he's just, his whole career has been canceled here. The company that he's founded has been taken away from him. You know, with the CEO and the transgender mob. It disturbs me to see that. It really does.

Here's another one. This is an Australian reality TV star who I don't know, but he has been canceled because of an Instagram post that was critical of drag queen story time. His agency dropped him because they said he made hurtful comments that did not align with our values. what were those hurtful comments he put up an image and don't put this up Travis I'll just describe it to people an image of a drag queen a guy dressed as a woman who would be reading at the event. The guy calls himself Charisma Bell,

and the drag performer, Charisma Bell, himself, posted this image. And it's disgusting. And because he reposted this disgusting image that was put up by the drag performer, he got canceled. So the drag performer, there was his leg spread and a taco in his crotch. And the caption, this guy, this reality TV star in Australia, criticized the event, said this is not fit for kids as young as three because this drag queen performance is inherently sexual.

There's absolutely no way you can look at that disgusting picture and not say that it is not sexual. Everything about it is sexual and taunting. This is what they don't understand. This is why when you look at the Drudge Report, how freaked out they are in mainstream media, they're coming for the drag queens, we've been doing this for years, and all the rest of this stuff.

It's like, well, maybe you've been pedophiles for years. And maybe people have just awakened to this. You haven't been doing this drag queen stuff. And it is lewd. And it is the kind of thing that people should be arrested for if they do it in the presence of a minor. This is not just stopping them from doing it in the presence. They should be arrested. And with these laws, hopefully they will be arrested

if they do this in the presence of a minor. So again, Tennessee is going to be the first one to do it. There's a lot of them that are in the queue to have this happen. It's passed by, I believe, both houses of the legislature, awaiting the governor's signature. I think he's going to do it. So what they, this is how they fought him. You'll see, at least it was up there this morning on the Drudge Report. Maybe it was there last night, didn't have internet. But you'll see a picture, supposedly, of the governor of Tennessee. They said, look, you know, he's going to sign this thing to stop drag shows. And yet he was in drag. And if you look at it, it looks like some kind of a, you know, staying next to him is some girl in a suit wearing a hat

or something. And it's obviously some kind of a high school or college skit probably for a pep rally or something like that uh put up there without context anyway um so he says i would personally think said this guy who got canceled the reality tv star in australia he said i would personally think that the age of 12 is more suitable for that kind of thing i don't know i don't know why you would do that at the age of 12 that more suitable for that kind of thing. I don't know. I don't know why you would do that at the age of 12. That's one of the things I always said about, what is this about PG-13?

Oh, okay, well, now you're 13 years old, so you can watch this or that. Or now you're 17 years old, so you can watch an R-rated film. How did we ever get to that point? You know, you talk about adult film, it doesn't have anything to do with age. That's one of the things that the MPAA's rating system

has confused everybody over. Adult movies are not about movies that are for adult people. It's movies that have been adulterated. That's where that term comes from. It doesn't mean that it's a sign of your maturity. It's a sign of your immaturity and your fallenness if you're into pornography like that. It's not adult. It's adulterated entertainment.

These are adulterated performances. They're degraded, if you will, morally degraded. They shouldn't be there for kids. After all, this is a taxpayer funded event in my neighborhood. I think I have the right to ask that question. So here we are. It's being done by the government. I have a right to question what the government is doing.

It's being done for kids as young as three. I think kids at 12. I think you ought to be at least 12 years old to see a guy dressed up like a woman spreading his bare legs with a taco in his crotch. You know, at least 12, yes. 12 would be fine. Yeah, sure. And so now they have gotten him canceled, just like they did Christian Henson. My income and my ability to put food on the table has been taken away because I expressed an opinion. That's the point. You see, that's the political agenda behind this. Satan's got an agenda for sure. The political agenda is we get power over you. We can control your speech. We can get you and force you to not only tolerate, but then to celebrate and then to do it yourself.

Let us do it with your kids. That's what they're ultimately after. Complete domination. 40% of liberal professors are now afraid that they'll lose their jobs over a misunderstanding. This is a new survey from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression called FIRE.

They do a lot, especially in universities because universities have become ill liberal they don't tolerate much they don't tolerate anything that they don't like and there's not much that they do like and so they're not about individual rights and expression this is a new survey done by fireIRE of 1,400 faculty members. And one person who spoke out about this and wrote the article about it, Samuel J. Abrams, says, As a professor, I'm on the younger side for faculty members. My cohort is much more illiberal than their older colleagues. Isn't that amazing? Isn't that?

That's how they steal things, right? Just like they stole the name woman, right? They stole the name liberal. Liberal used to mean that you were about liberty. It used to mean that you were about liberating people. It used to mean in the context of education that you were liberating people's minds. That's what classical education was understood as a liberal education. You're giving people the tools of learning. You give the kids the tools of learning so that they can learn themselves.

You educate them in the basics of reading, writing and arithmetic, and then they're able to take it from that and pursue their own interests. That was a liberating thing. That's not what they're interested in anymore. The antithesis of a liberal education is propaganda and mind control, which is what all of our schools from K through kindergarten, or from a K through college are about. They're all about dominating. Education is not the filling of a bucket. It's the lighting of a fire.

It's not about giving people things from authorities and experts that they need to pare it back to you. But that is exactly what this is about. That's why the universities have been so useful for this takedown of our formerly free societies. We need to understand what the problem is so that we can get rid of it. If we don't understand and identify the problem, we'll never get rid of it. So we need to understand what they've done to us. And we need to understand this is coming out of the universities.

And let's get rid of the state funding for the universities. You want to talk about state funding for your drag shows? What about the state funding for K-12? What about the state funding for colleges? Get rid of that. As a professor, he says, I'm on the younger side of my family members. My cohort is much more illiberal than their older colleagues. Two thirds of faculty over the age of 55 said students shouting down a speaker is never

acceptable. But he says, when you look at faculty that's 35 and under, only 37% of people say that it's never acceptable to shout somebody down. So you go from 67 to 37% of people who oppose shouting down a speaker. That means that it's flipped around the other way. You have two-thirds of people over 55 say it's never acceptable to shout down somebody because you disagree with them, whereas two-thirds say it's not acceptable at that age, but you go down to the 35s, next generation, two-thirds say that it is acceptable.

That's the issue here. Urgent prayer request on Rockfin. Handy posting for Michael Pomeroy. Good morning, all. Asking for prayer for my daughter having an emergency C-section this morning. The baby is at 28 weeks. That's very early. Okay, so let's pull that up again.

Michael Pomeroy. Yes, please keep Michael Pomeroy in your prayers. May God bless this baby and his family and give them peace. So sorry to hear that. And by the way, we're going to get handy. And we had handy scheduled for yesterday. We're going to reschedule. And I'm sorry, Andy, if we didn't get that information to you.

We couldn't. Because we had no internet, we couldn't pull up on our computers our email stuff. So we couldn't find your email address to even email you on our phones because it was only on the computer. So I apologize for that. We got that to you late. But talking about the speech, again, to say complete reversal with a difference in age is 20 years.

That's one generation, right? So what we're seeing now, that's why we're rushing headlong into a fourth turning, as Strauss and Howe said. You know, every 80 years, approximately, about every four generations, and they space them out by about 20-year periods. And these are the people who came up with the terms that we still use, millennials and Gen X and Gen Y and Gen Z and all the rest of this stuff. But they went back and they looked at a cyclical history through 500 years of American and British history. But now the world is synchronized because we now have global communications, global economy, and that's where we are right now. So we've never had this kind of dangerous situation in terms of this radical change across the globe.

That's what these people are trying to exploit right now. He said younger faculty report more acceptance of even violence, not just shouting somebody down, but actually getting violent with them. 97% of the older faculty, that's 55 and up, say that it is never acceptable for a student to use violence to stop speech on campus, but only 79% of the younger faculty agree. So that means that one in five, 20% of them, would say, yeah, let's use violence to stop any speech we don't agree with. Among liberal faculty, 35 and under, only 23% indicated that students shouting down a speaker is never acceptable, compared to 88% of the conservative faculty. Only 64% of young and liberal faculty say that it is never acceptable for students to use violence to stop a campus speech.

So the young liberals, 36% of them will use violence against you. We've seen that. In 1955, he said at the end of the second Red Scare, after World War II, during the age of McCarthy and deep anti-communist fear, 9% of social scientists said that they toned down their writing for fear of causing a controversy. However, today we have 25% of people say that they're very or extremely likely to self-censor their writing in academic publications. So the people in academic societies, and again, you know, Marxism at the time was far more prevalent in academic circles

than it was anywhere else, always is. And so you had 9% during McCarthy's era were afraid to say something because they were afraid to be labeled as a communist. Today that number is 25%. Afraid that they'll be labeled i don't know conservative or christian or something like that transphobic homophobic lgbt phobic no i don't fear them i'm theophobic i don't fear i don't fear homos or trans or anybody. I fear God. Uh, more than half

of faculty, 52% say they're afraid they'll lose their reputation or reputation over a misunderstanding of something they said or did. Like you see with Christian Henson, perhaps, although he was upset about the fact that they are targeting young children. Uh, but these are people who are liberal. They agree with these values, but they're afraid that their illiberal liberal friends will misunderstand something that they said, and they'll lose everything. This is what happens when you create these repressive, totalitarian, mind-control regimes. Everybody can become instantly an enemy of the revolution. Anybody can be sent to guillotine.

Metaphorically, career-wise, or eventually, they will use violence against you. They don't like your speech? You've already got more than a third of them saying, yeah, let's use violence against anybody we don't like. Well, what does that include? Next question they should ask, does that include the guillotine? Two in five professors who are part of the prevailing orthodoxy on campus fear that they will lose their job over a misunderstanding. They buy into it. They really do. They really think that they're evil incarnate if they're white. But they're still afraid that somebody is going to misunderstand that

and kick them out. You see, this is what we need to not be, and that is why it's such an effective thing for us to have as our foundation, Christ, Christianity, the Bible, a hope of eternal life that is grounded on something. If we have that, we don't have to worry about these people. Yeah, you don't want to have that happen, and you want to, as much as possible, try to be at peace with other people. You don't want to have pain and suffering. You want to try to avoid that if possible. But if your focus is eternal,

you look at it and say, well, you know, this is what I have to do. And if the consequences for that are bad, I'll leave that to God. And they don't have that. All these people have is their pathetic little job at the university, and they are recycling this hate and these lies and this fear. They're recycling it with every generation that comes through, and it's become very intense now. As the report says from FIRE, this speaks volumes about the climate of fear, intimidation, and censorship on campus. Our society cannot thrive when opposing voices

are met with fists rather than with facts. I like that. But you know, this fear and intimidation that happens there, is that any different than what's going on with Fox News, for example? Or what's going on with the alternative media? You know, that it's

afraid to criticize Trump or even talk about it. I talked last week about Wayne Ellenrood. Here's a guy who focuses so much, and even Paul, Dr. Paul Alexander. Alexander, they focus on the hideous bioweapon, the vaccine that Trump is so proud of, sees himself as the father of it, rightfully so, as I've said many times. He produced it. He was a producer. Fauci was the director. This is a movie. And as much as Wayne Allen Root and Dr. Paul Alexander, and there's many other people like that, oppose that, they continue to cheer Trump.

They continue to tell him that he's our only hope. Do they really believe that, or are they just afraid of the mob? And, you know, again, same thing we're talking about in the universities. Well, Elon Musk is looking at chat LGBT. And there was a longtime associate of his, David Sachs, who criticized it in a video that was put up on Twitter. Musk commented on that,

and Sachs said in the tweet where he put up the video, he said, there is mounting evidence that OpenAI's safety layer is very biased. Oh, really? I don't think there's any question about this. that OpenAI's safety layer is very biased. Oh, really? I don't think there's any question about this. There's mounting evidence?

No, the jury is in. It's as bad as it's going to possibly be. That's why I talk about it. The danger is that it's going to be used for things. But it is very biased. He says, if you thought trust and safety were bad under Vijaya or YOL, wait until AI doesn't. What he's referencing to is the former Twitter general counsel and head of legal, Vijaya Gade, and the former Twitter head of trust and safety, YOL Roth, who were kind of personally spearheading this censorship. And so Trump, Trump, Musk responded and said it's a very important threat.

And so that's kicked off people saying, well, maybe Musk is going to do something about it. There's rumors that he approached Igor Bab babushkin an ai researcher who previously worked with alphabet that's google about opening a research lab he denies that he has um that he's joined the project yet but musk has talked about the fact that you know chat l chat LGBT is built on open AI and many other things that art projects and stuff like that are built on open AI. Uh, Musk has said that he, um, he co-founded that in the, as an early investor in 2015, he left it in 2019. He says he's not very satisfied with the direction of it. So is there going to be a situation where Elon Musk will do a non woke version of AI is that good you may not be aware of this

my son was telling me that there has been a project by some individuals just acting on their own they went back and they took some of the earlier engines of, because there's been several different versions of chat LGBT and the chat box and the software that's the basis of that, they went back and they took the kernel of that and then they added a database which is not nearly as extensive as the one that's used by the online model, but they set it up so it could be used on a personal computer. So it's really small and it got pretty good results from this other stuff. And it doesn't have the layer, the last layer that was put on there to skew the reporting or to censor anything that's said.

And so you look at that or you look at what Musk is doing. Is that a good thing? Again, as I said, I don't think that even those things are good things. I think we need to – I think it's going to – even if it helps you to do your job, there is a certain amount of – I have a concern that, you know, even though I use software to find my way around an unfamiliar place in terms of getting directions, it's very convenient, but it's come at a price.

We have lost a lot of our ability to read maps or to just kind of intuitively find our way, which is one thing that men are famous for thinking they've got a better idea how to intuitively find their way than we really are. That's a longstanding joke about the difference between men and women. But nevertheless, there is certain things that are atrophying, as I've mentioned in the past, even the people who do the knowledge, the taxi drivers in London where it's very complicated, you can actually see as they exercise their brain, you can actually see a physical difference in their brain. And as these types of faculties are atrophying on us, that is not a positive thing. So if you

use it to do practical stuff, well, pretty soon you're going to start to lose your ability to do practical stuff if it saves you some time. And it always has the threat that if we trust it too much, and it can come across as very trustworthy. So again, it's exactly the kind of tool for breakthrough brainwashing that tyrants and despots need. That's the article here from Climateer Investing. Have you ever found yourself sitting at home in the palace thinking, if only there was an easier way to get the people to do my bidding? See, that's what's going on. This is what's really behind the thinking of people like Bill Gates.

We've got to get an id for everybody you know where does that come from well that's that's comes from him sitting at home at the palace thinking is there an easier way for me to be able to get people to do my bidding uh so anyway um he says uh look at this article from The Hill talking about generative AI. In other words, it's not full general AI where the thing can think, but it's moving in that direction. This is from Monday, February the 20th, or actually Sunday, The Hill. Generative AI, says The Hill, is poised to be the free world's next great gift to authoritarians. The fierce debate that has ensued among Western industry leaders on the risks of releasing advanced generative AI tools has largely missed where their effects are likely to be most pernicious within

autocracies. Now, the whole gist of this op-ed piece that was on the Hill Sunday was to say, we don't have to worry about it because we got democracies, right? But it's going to be real. If we develop this in the Western governments, look at how this is going to be used in China and Russia

and other authoritarian societies. The Biden administration would never use it to control us, right? We just had the Biden administration issue a directive to all of government saying when you use artificial intelligence, make sure that it's something like chat LGBT, where it's got a layer there of equity propaganda. He says, so far, concerns around generative AI and autocrats have mostly focused on how these systems can turbocharge Chinese and Russian propaganda efforts in the United States.

So this person at the Hill would never say of how this could turbocharge propaganda efforts in the United States against American citizens. Oh, perish the thought. We would never have our government try to propagandize us like they have the last 1,084 days. He says autocrats can use the full power of their states to optimize their propaganda's influence. In 2019, China's jinping demanded just that when he ordered his party state to leverage ai to quote comprehensively increase the ability of the chinese communist party to mold chinese public opinion is that any different than biden's see, the difference is that Xi Jinping wants generative AI

to make the Chinese Communist Party look good. Biden wants generative AI to make LGBT agenda look good, right? That's the only difference we're seeing. He says Putin has similarly doubled down on AI-enabled propaganda in the wake of the Ukraine invasion, including a fake video of Zelensky calling for Ukrainians to surrender. I doubt that that clumsy thing was done by the Russian state. Whether it was or not, it didn't fool anybody. China and Russia are, in other other words fertile ground for generative ai

to usher in an historic breakthrough in brainwashing a recipe for more international catastrophes greater human right abuses and further entrenched despotism but we don't have to worry about it in china and russia we don't have to worry about breakthroughs and brainwashing here in the united states how many breakthroughs do we to worry about breakthroughs and brainwashing here in the United States. How many breakthroughs do we have in the last three years in brainwashing? Finally, he ends up saying this, Luckily, companies in the United States and in allied nations have largely led the advance of generative AI capabilities.

That's coming from the hill. Zero Hedge replies, And why is it lucky that the U.S. has led the development? The message is clear. We Americans have nothing to fear from generative AI misuse apart from Russia and China. And if you believe that, we've got a bridge that will sell you. Well, it's not a bridge they want to sell us. It's a bridge to full on the dream of artificial intelligence. I've talked about the fallacies of many people in artificial intelligence who believe that if they can create a replica of the brain, that it'll somehow spring to life. If the replica is good enough, it'll spring to life,

and it'll become self-aware. It'll become sentient. It'll become conscious, whatever they mean by that. And again, as I talked about last week, look at it from a philosophical or religious standpoint. What does that mean? They don't have any answers for that. These are people who are materialists,

and so they think that the brain is a computer, and they're going to do something with it. Well, now, here is another example of this. We have researchers at Johns Hopkins University are detailing how brain machine technologies are the newest frontier in biocomputing. And they've got a roadmap about how to make it a reality. What they want to do is they want to grow human brains, just like they want to grow biopsy burgers and tumor teriyaki

and all the rest of this stuff, right? We are going to take a little piece of flesh from a chicken or a cow or something like that, and we're going to grow it into a burger. And you don't have to worry about that, or do you? Because the cells that are going to continue to replicate, which is what they're going to need on a large-scale manufacturing operation, they're going to need cells that are eternal cells that continue to replicate. Frequently, those are cancer cells that's why i call it tumor teriyaki you want to get one of those um and so now the same idea is being taken to, and we can grow it.

They call it organoid intelligence. O-I instead of A-I. So instead of it being artificial in the sense it's going to be silicon and circuits, it's going to be organic. It's going to be human brain cells. And we'll use that as a computer, because we all know, they said, that brain it's going to be human brain cells. And we'll use that as a computer because we all know, they said, that brain organoids are much more dense in terms of storage capacity,

in terms of speed of thinking, and all this other stuff. So that's what we need to do. We need to go with a bionic computer, biological hardware. It could one day be more efficient than the current computers running AI programs, said one researcher from John Hopkins University, wrote this to Motherboard, which has the article here. He said, if we look at how efficiently the human brain operates in processing of information, learning, etc., it is tempting to translate that model

to have a system that would work faster and more efficiently than current computers. Again, the fallacy of all this is the idea that the brain is merely a computer or that it operates as computers do. But, of course, you see the ethical issues here, and you see the big elephant in the room. These people don't see God as the designer of the brain. They'll study how it works,

but they will never see the design of it, or the designer, even if they do see the design. We're reaching the physical limits of silicon computers because we cannot pack more transistors into a tiny chip but the brain is wired completely differently it has about a hundred billion neurons linked through over a 1015 connection points it's an enormous power difference compared to our current technology well i would expect god to do nothing less you know we had these people using uh cranking out dna models for decades and francis collins said we're done we figured it out we got a lot of junk dna because it's just not not important no they don't understand it but they declare themselves finished and yet um they can

look at dna they can look at the code the auto-correcting code they can look at the the same code that is every animal in every plant and not see a common designer that's the amazing thing to me and same thing with this they can look at the brain and say well look how sophisticated that is compared to our computers and it is we can But we can't admit that there is a God. Again, that is a fool, a rebellious fool to say that. And that's what fool really means in the context of the Bible, a rebellion. And so they can look at that and they can dismiss that, say there is no God. Of course, there is a God, but the question is, has he spoken to us and where did he speak to us? And again, that's another, that's a separate issue.

And I think it's very easy to make the case that the Bible stands alone in that. But these people reject God and they reject ethics and they see themselves as God playing with this. This is one of the reasons I think they may be pushing for this brain-computer interface. I just can't see people lining up to do this. You might have some people who are desperately paralyzed or something like that who would take the risk to have these things put into their body. Elon Musk's thing, you know, putting it, sticking a chip directly on your brain, all the issues involved with that in terms of heat and charging and, you know, infection, which has killed most of his monkeys that he experimented on.

But even when you look at the other approaches being taken by the rest of the billionaires who want to control the world, and let's not forget, Musk is one of them. He is a billionaire who wants to control the world. He has technocratic royalty. His grandfather, Joshua Haldane, kicked out of Canada because he tried to overthrow the Democrat-elected representative government and instill a technocracy. And that was back in the 1930s. He's talking about all these different things, brain, computer, interface. But so are Gates and so is Bezos,

and they're investing in companies because there's a lot of different companies that are doing this. It's not just Neuralink. And they're investing hundreds of millions of dollars in this, the government, DARPA, this dark agency that is constantly abusing technology for evil purposes. They're all heavily invested in this.

And the approach that's being taken by Bezos and Gates and their company that they got into, you inject something into the bloodstream instead of putting it on the brain. And supposedly it can interface with the brain in a particular area. I forget where it was or how it was, but they inject it into your bloodstream. This is dystopian sci-fi tech, if ever there was any. Just as with artificial intelligence, they said, there are ethical concerns. They propose an embedded ethics approach where interdisciplinary and representative teams of ethicists, researchers, and members of the public

identify, discuss, and analyze ethical issues and feed these back to inform future research and work. And once you produce your report, guess what you'll find? Nobody there will care. And nothing will change. We have functional brain organoids already, said one of these scientists. Since we have an electrophysiological active system

which has synchronous electrical activity and is responsive to chemical and electrical stimuli the next step we're working on is to characterize and optimize the system further by demonstrating key molecular and cellular aspects of learning in particular Don't trust it don't don't have anything to do with this you don't trust it. Don't have anything to do with this. You don't need it. And it is extremely dark stuff.

We will be right back. Joe, we've got a problem. What? Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right? So basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because, basically, you can't hold coffee with your hands, right? I'm with you scatly, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm be ready for it. You dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee,

then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we own the world. These people, they're supporting free speech with every mug they buy. Come on. These people I tell you

will anyway. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about the war in Ukraine. When we look at what is happening there, it's kind of interesting to see the different reports that we're getting from different individuals. I find I had a listener, Austin, who sent a video clip of one person speaking. If you have paid attention to this, there wasn't anything that was new, really, or unusual in what the guy was saying.

But he was speaking to a couple of people on stage who were sitting in a couple of, I think if I remember correctly, I looked at the video, they were congressional representatives, and they're sitting on chairs that really kind of look like thrones, and Austin pointed that out. And he's absolutely right. representatives, and they're sitting on chairs that really kind of look like thrones, and Austin pointed that out. And he's absolutely right. And they think that you don't know anything about what is happening there.

But the reality is that there are reports that are coming out on both sides of how this war is escalating. From the Ukrainian side, a retired American Marine fighting in Ukraine told ABC News that the front lines are a meat grinder for the Ukrainians. He said soldiers are surviving an average of four hours. Four hours. Troy Offenbecker, fighting alongside Ukrainian forces in the Donbass region, a retired American Marine.

He said that Kiev, he estimates, I'm sorry, rather in Germany, it was not him, but in January, Germany estimated that Kiev was losing three-digit number of soldiers daily in fighting for just one city, Bakhmut. At the time, the White House believed that Zelensky was committing too many lives and resources to defend that city. But this retired Marine, Offenbecker's commentary, suggests that this may be getting even worse. It's been pretty bad on the ground. He said a lot of casualties,

the life expectancy is around four hours on the front line. And the reason for that, he said, the Russian attack on the city is not letting up and it's turned into a meat grinder with artillery nonstop. He said Russian forces are fighting around the clock. The Russians have maybe run into a shortage of shells lately, but the past couple of weeks it's been nonstop all day, all night, he told ABC News. Then on the other side, we have an escalation in terms of mass drone attacks being unleashed inside Russia, going farther and farther inside Russia. So what we were saying earlier when we were talking about the perceived existential threat of the Russian people as well

as Putin, you know, all of the things people as well as Putin. You know, all of the things that they have believed, that many people who were dismissed as conservatives or hardliners had told them since the Yugoslavian war that NATO was coming after them, many indications that we were not going to abide by the treaties, that, you know, that was, that the goal, the objective was to take out Russia. Well, now there is absolutely no question in Russia that they're in a fight for their very lives. They're an existential fight. Russia has come under attack by multiple drones on Tuesday, one hitting just outside Moscow. An oil depot fire in Russia overnight.

And another area that was only about 500 kilometers from the nearest Ukrainian-held territory. Look, as this is happening in Russia, as I said before, you're going to see, I think, many, many more attacks on our infrastructure that you need to prepare for. Even if we don't have a full-on nuclear war full-on war with Russia and China it's going to be preceded by the way with attacks on our infrastructure and they can do these types of things and I think they are doing these types of things and they can do it with plausible deniability. If they do a physical attack, well, it's always going to be dismissed if it's obviously a physical attack on infrastructure.

It'll be dismissed or attributed to extreme right-wing figures when in actuality could likely be anyone coming across the border and doing this from any hostile nation. But the key thing is going to be cyber attacks. Those are going to be dismissed as ransomware. And I think that a lot of these ransomware attacks are exactly that. There's no way that Russia can do that, and there's no way that they're going to be able to pin that on them so as we see you know people with a life expectancy of four hours on the front in this one particular city that's undergoing heavy shelling the russians are doing this with an increased intensity because of the coming escalation in

terms of equipment and other things you know can't be deployed right away. The people have to be trained in how to use it. So Russia is trying to finish this up before that happens. But it's not just the Biden administration. Look, we've got Rick Scott, who is slamming Joe Biden's pacifist approach to China. And this is being put out by Breitbart, essentially in agreement with him. Oh, because it's Biden.

If Biden isn't warlike enough, we need to have the Republicans step in and do this as well. So on Sunday, he attacked Biden. Rick Scott did. Senator, former governor of Florida, lamented the administration's simpering efforts to appease Beijing. That's what Breitbart is saying. That's their words, is simpering efforts to appease Beijing. Scott said, all that Biden does is to pacify China. I don't know what it is, but this is a guy who won't stand up to dictators around the world.

Well, the way I see it, he's being paid off by all these people. He's not being paid off just by Ukraine and China, but he's doing everything he can to push us into World War III and George W. Bush came back out of hiding I guess he's tired of sitting in the bathtub painting portraits

of his feet no joke he did that so now he's out there as a public face and no, we don't miss you yet, George. Uh, you can go back home. Uh,

and I think we know what the W stand for right now. It stands for warmonger, uh, George warmonger Bush pushing back on any GOP criticism of the Ukraine funding, not going to constrain helping the U S citizens here. You know, we, uh, Not going to constrain helping the U.S. citizens here. You know, we...

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken spoke at the event with George Warmonger Bush because they're all on the same page. As a matter of fact, maybe these Republicans want to go faster, you see. This is why they push these wars with the Democrats because they think that the Democrat base doesn't want war. Of course, that's changed now. That's the old paradigm.

The Democrats were for civil liberties and against foreign wars. That's not the truth anymore, but the Republicans are still out there ahead of them on all this stuff. U.S. military aid to Ukraine has now exceeded the cost of what we gave in military aid to Afghanistan. As of June the 15th this year, $46.6 billion in financial aid for military purposes to Ukraine. And that's just the military spending. That's not counting the fact that we're going to make their pension plan good. Well, we don't have a plan even for Social Security here necessarily, but we're going to make sure that they're good. We're going to make sure that we build their economy. Whether or not the rest of us as Americans get that, that remains to be seen.

Every couple of days, you see another announcement from Biden or in this particular case, Janet Yellen going to Ukraine. She's now announced another one and a quarter billion dollars. Wasn't it just a couple of days ago that we had Biden doing essentially the same thing? I don't know, half a billion dollars or a billion dollars. It's like every couple of days they announce a new program of around a billion dollars that they're going to give this endlessly corrupt country. I've played the clip in the past, I don't have it on the board today,

of Bill Gates saying, unfortunately, Ukraine is probably the most corrupt government anywhere. Bill Gates said that. I guess that's one of the reasons why the Democrats got so heavily involved there. Just like they do in Chicago, by the way. You saw that Lori Lightfoot got kicked out of Chicago, right? That's a real precedent setter. You just don't have mayors in Chicago as corrupt as that city has been for so long. You just don't have mayors in Chicago, as corrupt as that city has been for so long. You just don't have mayors get voted out.

Well, I'm sure that they didn't get somebody in there who is going to really make a substantive change. It just couldn't stand her. Russia is turning to China's yuan in an effort to ditch the dollar every day. We see more examples of how Biden is destroying the reserve status of the dollar, which is going to have massive consequences for the federal debt, as well as all of us as individuals. So with all of this happening,

they're very clearly moving in a path, preparing a path to go to war with China. I think that's one of the key things about this narrative of the lab leak stuff. Before we run out of time, I just want to give you an update as to what is happening on some of the border issues. It truly is amazing to see what is happening on the border with this rancher. They put a million-dollar bounty on his head, wouldn't let him out bond, wouldn't let him out of jail to a 73-year- this rancher. They put a million dollar bounty on his head. Wouldn't let him out bond. Wouldn't let him out of jail. A 73-year-old rancher. He doesn't have a lot of money.

He's got a ranch out there in the middle of the desert. He's got an elderly wife. He wanted to be there to protect her because they're in danger from all the trafficking that is going across the border there. But they put a million-dollar bond against him. They charged him with first-degree murder. That's premeditated, all the rest of the stuff. It's unbelievable. The judge who is doing this is a justice of the peace. A justice of the peace.

Never forget the tyranny that can be leveled at the local level. It was a probate judge who killed Terry Chaveau because Governor Jeb Bush and President George Bush would not intervene on her behalf. As I've said many times, you know, you better pay attention to what's happening locally because they can make things a lot worse or they can stand in the gap and they can intervene against tyranny from, or they can stand in the gap and they can intervene against tyranny from above,

or it can go the other way. So this is Justice of the Peace, Emilio Velasquez. Velasquez, I guess is how you pronounce his name. What are his motivations? Well, we don't know, but certainly the guy is obviously biased. Whatever his motivations are, his actions scream extreme prejudice. So they've changed this charge. Of course, it's not just the judge, but it's also the prosecutor. They've moved the charge from first degree down to second degree. They changed it for the one

million. They would not come back off of that, but they allowed him to put up his house as collateral, and he had a fundraiser on give, send, go. So between the money that he got on give, send, go and the house as collateral, the guy's not a flight risk. You don't need to put a million-dollar bond on him. He's 73 years old. He's never had any issues with anything. The prosecutors didn't elaborate on the downgraded felony charge, but he also faces two additional charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Look, if they convict him of anything, he's 73 years old. You look at him, he's pretty fragile. If they convict him of any of these charges, it's a life sentence. His attorney asked the judge to grant a continuance. She said,

since the state's case had changed drastically and there were new disclosures. We'll talk about that in a second. She said, in my experience, it's routine to grant continuances. Mr. Kelly should not be treated any differently, but he is being treated differently by this judge, Emilio Velasquez. Anyway, she said, frankly, I'm amazed at the state's opposition to a request for continuance. So what has changed, I believe, I've not seen this before, the fact that he called it in, and he had both the Border Patrol and the Sheriff's Office come there, look, nobody found a body. Then later in the day, he found a body.

And when these people were there, they had AK-47s. They were in military gear. The guy that they found dead eventually had a radio on him. Everything looked like they were doing involved in some kind of trafficking. He said they pointed the gun at them. He told his wife, stay down. And he went out and said he shot some warning shots over their heads. Then he called the Border Patrol and the police.

They came by. They didn't find a body. Then later in the day, he was out riding and he came across the body and then he called them again said hey there's a body come you know and um so why did they not find it that it happened at a different time uh around 5 p.m so So he said, now, as all this is happening, a detective from Santa Cruz County is basically on his side against the prosecutor and against the judge. This Santa Cruz County detective, Larkin, in cross-examination from the defense council, said, I arrested him based on the totality of the circumstances alone.

The detective said, and the, the new evidence was that the prosecutors called a guy in. They don't, they protect his identity. He testified that he was with the deceased man. He says, our group was walking when this gentleman shot at us

said the witness and i saw gabriel hold his chest he added then that the man who died rolled his eyes and fell to the ground sideways i ran i couldn't help him the witness testified that the gunshots were about 15 in total sounded sounded like rounds from an AK-47. But the Santa Cruz County detective, Larkin, says that's not credible. The Santa Cruz detective said there was no reason to believe the absolutely incredible, quote-unquote, absolutely incredible testimony of the witness. The police found no shell casings and the quantity matching the witness description so they didn't find a body they didn't see a bunch of they see 15 shell casings

ejected because the guy's sitting there pull them off one after one one after the other on an AR and the detective said it is not conceivable that Mr. Kelly aimed from his porch, somehow saw this person, and made this long, difficult shot. Obviously, there's a dead body there, but there needs to be a probable cause that this crime took place and that this specific person committed this crime. Just because the body was found on his property after the police and the border patrol couldn't find him, and because they brought in a criminal protecting his identity who accuses him and makes false statements about the number of shots based on there's no evidence to show that. As a matter of fact, there's physical evidence to deny that.

And the detective says says it's absolutely incredible so the detective larkin asked the judge to do the right thing and to find no probable cause in the case and yet the judge who first came after you know the judge and prosecutor who first came after this guy for a million dollars is um still after him This has essentially lit a match over an incredibly intense political powder keg and predictably there was an explosion, said the detective. It's all political.

Just to give you a metaphor for what is happening here, though, with the intentional chaos at the border by Biden and others. A Swiss man evicted from his home to make way for asylum seekers. This is a metaphor for what's literally happening everywhere. You will be evicted from your home, the American dream, if you can't pay for schools to educate all the children who decide that they want to come here

and be educated at your expense from anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to be Mexico. It doesn't have to be Central America or even Latin America. They can come from any country in the world and become your dependents and you will have to pay for it. And whether you own a house or whether you rent, you will pay for it in your property taxes. Look at what is happening to the explosion in schools. That's what I saw in Texas. A Swiss man in Zurich has claimed that his local municipality has given him an eviction notice

so they can accommodate asylum seekers and refugees. He rents his apartment from the state. He's 47 years old, and he's been told that he has to leave by the end of May. The local government even admits that they received an order from the regional government to provide more housing for asylum seekers. He said, I'm incredibly sad. I have lived here for over 15 years. My children grew up in this apartment, he said. I'm scared. I don't think I can find another affordable home in the area in the next three months that can accommodate myself, my children who visit me every two weeks, and my pets.

There's been an outcry on social media over the move, but the municipality said, well, this decision was difficult to make. But unfortunately, this is the last possibility to reach the quota for reception of refugees prescribed by the regional government. After he is removed from the apartment, five migrants will be placed into the flat. That is what they're doing. They're dispossessing us. Again, the quote that has attributed Jefferson, although there's no evidence that it was from Jefferson,

but it is a true quote. When we allow the central banks to take over our economies, we'll find that we're homeless on the continent that our forefathers conquered. And that's the reality that we look at here. The Biden administration is not worried about that. What is the Biden administration worried about? Well, they're worried about a 2008 warrantless wiretap spy law that may lapse if they don't renew it who was president in 2008 well that would be george w bush george warmonger bush that happened in 2008 giving some you know extensions and some loopholes to the FISA restrictions that were there.

That's section 702. They said, without that, we'll lose indispensable intelligence. And yet, the thing that I was most surprised about with this, we all know that they're doing wiretaps without any probable cause, that they're actually using FISA, which was supposed to stop them from doing that. They're actually using FISA in order to do that. What I found surprising about all this stuff was that in Breitbart,

they attributed all this to Obama. They even say, the law initially passed in 2008 when the Obama administration was worried about Middle East terrorism. No, they weren't really worried about that. They were worried about Americans. That's why they want to spy on Americans without search warrants.

But Obama was elected in 2008. He was elected in November of 2008. And as you know, presidents take office at the end of January. So Obama took office in January of 2009. But see, this is another example of blind partisanship. We don't have a problem with an unelected, unaccountable national security state that has actually become a real government. No, the problem is with Obama.

Obama is just a front. Obama is just an idiot front like George W. Bush. Although Obama, you know, both of them having connections to the CIA and their family. You know, Obama, it was his grandparents. With George W. Bush, it was his daddy. All of them, CIA blood. That's what it's all about but no let's play the republican democrat game that's by all means let's do that well thank you for joining us gonna be back on here The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.

Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions using free speech to free minds it's the david knight show