The David Knight Show - 20Aug24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED - The ELOI Society — Technocrats Know Exactly What They're Doing

Episode Date: August 20, 2024

(2:00) NewsPhil Donahue dies — remember when the radical left was anti-war instead of totalitarian warmongers?  Donahue was fired for opposition to Iraq warAyn Rand tells Donahue why she thought selfishness was a virtueFamilies are now so dysfunctional that they need a charity to help potty train their kidsGPS and the fragile infrastructure that's turning people into the Eloi of HG Well's Time Machine(34:16) Live and Let DEI — Secret Service literally asleep and another "chestfeeding" a baby while on duty (37:31) D&C ConventionWATCH Biden gets mixed up about women and power — taking electrical power away is good but he gets it mixed up with electoral powerSay Commie-La or you're racist - mispronouncing her name is unconscious bias at the very least, we're toldHow they got rid of Biden so easily.  Will they remove him from the presidency?The Democrat Cult of Death — never before has a party been so focused on openly celebrating murderLala has vax mandate for all campaign workers.  Your body, your choice? Freedom?CDC recommends Pfizer, Moderna & Novavax.  Peter McCullough also recommends Novavax and Molnupiravir which has EUA, Emergency Use Authorization.  What emergency?(1:06:21) Thanks to the producers that make the show possible (1:07:12) More D&C…Mao's WalzDemocrats DOUBLE DOWN on Walz's false military rankMore troubling details about Walz's fascination with Mao & Communist China.  The kindly uncle that's really the Manchurian Candidate.  What's not to love about the one-child policy?Trump's criticism of Lala's "economic" program is shallow and hypocritical.  It's actually the Washington Post that nailed her!"Sleeping" her way to the top(1:30:54) Woman arrested multiple times for silent prayer near sacred abortion space wins big payout….so the Thought Police move to make silent prayer illegal (1:37:33) "Church of England" moves to drop "church" from its name!  Not evolving but dissolving (1:40:42) Americans who identify as Christians has dropped from 90% in the 90's to 63%.  What demographic is leaving the fastest? (1:45:17) Bipartisan embrace of abortion from Austin ($500,000 for "abortion transportation") to NY (1:53:47) Cuba Shows How Cars Will Finally Be Ended Is THIS how cars ownership will be ended?  Communism and subsequent poverty ended Cubans being able to purchase cars.  But they managed to keep what they had running for the last 60 years…until now. (2:03:12) Eric Schmidt, Former Google CEO: Steal, Then Hire Lawyers Move fast and steal things.  Schmidt still has tremendous influence in Military Industrial Complex and with Democrats' White House.  He's now trying to walk back what he said at Stanford (2:14:07) BREAKING NEWS Prior Restraint of Ballot Access as Trump & Lala File Lawsuits Election corruption begins with ballot access and the two party system has mastered the manipulation.  Lala sues in NJ and Trump in WI to keep Dr. Shiva off the ballot. Dr. Shiva, shiva4president.com,  joins to give his perspective on citizenship, loyalty to THIS country over other countries, and the role of electors.Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's tuesday the 20th of august year of our lord 2024 well we're going to take a look at the beginning of the dnc uh biden had a very strange farewell and there are many strange things going on at the DNC. But there's also, when we look across the pond at England, the woman who was arrested multiple times for silent prayer has now gotten a big compensation from the police. But the new government has decided they're going to fix that. And they're talking about outlawing silent prayer.

Are they afraid of its efficacy no actually they think they are god it is a power play because the church of england is dropping the word church at least they're getting honest about it and in cuba where they have all of the classic cars. Well, we have the classic plan is playing out there. They can't get fuel, so they're pushing them to EV motorbikes. Just wait till the fires start. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Well, I'm going to begin, actually, not with the Democrat convention, but with a person who was always heavily involved with the Democrats. That is Phil Donahue, who I'm sure you've noticed I now died yesterday.

This was reported yesterday at the age of 88. And I always thought it was kind of interesting i used to watch phil donahue when i was in high school i used to like to i like to watch the talk shows and i would sit there karen can tell you i would sit there and say well that's not why i would have answered that i would have said this i like to kind of debate them in my mind and sometimes out loud but But Phil Donahue was one of the old school leftists. He was a radical leftist at the time, but he was also one of the old school, which meant that he was anti-war, which meant that he was a bleeding heart liberal. Yeah,

his misplaced compassion, but at least there was compassion there not like the full speed ahead let's have wars everywhere uh dictatorial totalitarian left that we see now the marxist left so i said the democrats have become marxists and the republicans have become democrats but uh it was kind of interesting to watch him. He was married to Marlo Thomas, got married the same year as Karen and I, 1980. But he had a show for 29 years. And he did about 7,000 one-hour shows. So I'm about to catch him.

We got our anniversary is coming up tomorrow of the show and and so i do three hours a day so i'm getting close to catching up with him but uh the thing that i thought was most interesting was the fact that, like Gerald Cilenti, Phil Donahue was basically, had his career ended on TV. Now, Gerald is still there. Of course, he's got Trends Journal, and you can still get that. You can even get 10% off using the code NIGHT. There we go. Got to plug in. But, you know, Gerald was on all the shows until he opposed the iraq war and so phil donnie who of course had been very successful you know 29 years i think he had nine emmys or something like that

that he got he retired and then he came back um after seven years of retirement he came back to msnbc and he came back in 2002 and then as wikipedia says on february the 25th 2003 msnbc canceled the show soon after the show's cancellation an internal msnbc memo was leaked to the press stating that donahue should be fired because he opposed the imminent U.S. invasion of Iraq. And that would be, quote, a difficult public face for NBC in a time of war. His program, they said, could be, quote, a home for the liberal anti-war agenda, unquote. Donahue commented in 2007 that the management of MSNBC, was owned by at the time by General Electric, and I have a clip of him talking to Democracy Now!, again, a leftist organization, and that was where he was. But he was at least unlike

Lala Harris and Biden and Obama, at least the left in those days was anti-war. And for the longest time, we've had the media as exercised censorship control to purge anybody that they disagree with, anybody that opposes the main thrust of their agendas. And that's true whether or not you're talking about the war in Iraq or Afghanistan, or whether you're talking about the war, the global war of all governments against their own people in 2020. But here's Phil Donahue as he talked about when he was fired. Well, I think what happened to me, the biggest lesson I think is the, how corporate media

shapes our opinions and our coverage. This was a decision, my decision, the decision to release me came from far above. This was not an assistant program director who decided to separate me from MSNBC. They were terrified of the anti-war voice, and that is not an overstatement. Anti-war voices were not popular. And if you're General Electric, you certainly don't want an anti-war voice on a cable channel that you own. Donald Rumsfeld is your biggest customer. So by the way, I had to have two conservatives on for every liberal. I could have Richard Perle on alone, but I couldn't have Dennis Kucinich on alone.

I was considered two liberals. It really is funny almost when you look back on how the management was just frozen by the anti-war voice. We were scolds. We weren't patriotic. American people disagreed with us. and we weren't good for business he was uh disinfo misinfo malinfo a traitor he worked for russia of course right so stuff we're here today just let it roll off your back folks you know what is true

say what's true don't care what they say about you but you know here's the blind spot that he has uh corporate media that wasn't just corporate media it was fascism an over word used word today and one that they misuse uh significantly fascism is the merger of corporations and government and that's really what was at work there the merger of corporations and government. And that's really what was at work there. The merger of corporations and government. Operation Mockingbird. As a matter of fact, if you go back and you look at it, it's an excellent video. I actually saw it when I got onto Twitter yesterday

to post yesterday's show. Somebody had reposted McDonald, who was with the John Birch Society. He was a Democrat congressman who was killed shortly after that. He was on a show with Pat Buchanan. And this guy, who was not just any CIA guy, he was the guy who ran Operation Mockingbird. And it was shortly after that, he handled that guy really well.

All the guy did was just call him a conspiracy theorist, you're crazy, the corporations would never do this, and the politicians would never do that, and so forth. And it wasn't long after that, that McDonald went down in that plane. But it's not just corporate media. The left, like Phil Donahue, a classic left, always sees corporations as a source of all evil.

And the right always sees government as a source of all evil. And they're both right and they're both wrong. Because both of these evil institutions, when taken to extremes, merge. And so what we have today is a merger of the very worst aspects of business and the very worst aspects of government. We don't have a free market. We don't have a competitive market. They work together to make sure they've got a monopoly. They work together to make sure that they shut down our speech.

Interesting that he was quite feeble and old. He really didn't get involved in all the social media takedown. But he did have a lot of interesting guests. And like I said, even though he had a very clear personal bias, he would talk to people who were different than him. He had on Milton Friedman, for example. He had on Ayn Rand. And I wanted to play for you just a little bit of the back and forth between Phil Donahue and Ayn Rand.

You don't go for altruism and charity and do good and liberal and... No. I'm conservative. You might as well edit all. You don't like the conservatives either? No. Lots of these conservatives. I want to help people. I want to do good for other people. What's so bad about that? Nothing.

If you do it by your own choice, and if it's not your primary aim in life, and if you don't regard it as a moral virtue. On those conditions, it's fine to help people if you want to. Why can't I think of it as a moral virtue? I mean, can't I take some bows for myself for doing all these good things? Because that would be cannibalism. Because that would mean that you preach altruism, which means not merely kindness, but self-sacrifice.

It means that you place the welfare of others above your own. That you live for others, for the sake of helping them, and that justifies your life. That's immoral, according to my morality. I don't understand why you have to be so harsh in your evaluation of those people. Why call it immoral? Why don't you just say it's a waste of time? Why pass judgment

on me? Because look at the state of the world today. You cannot be harsh enough on those who created it. And those who created it are the philosophers of altruism. It's those who created it and those who created it are the philosophers of altruism it's those who preach self-sacrifice selflessness self-abnegation all the anti-self theories which means anti-man all those who demand man's sacrifice they have succeeded and look at the results yeah so i don't know that

we have a world that is focused on putting the good of other people ahead of yourself do you think we have that problem in the last days people will be lovers of self and as a matter of fact you know this whole idea greed is good that you saw in the movie Wall Street and that type of thing. I know greed is not good. And it is a good thing to put the needs of other people ahead of yourself, to love your neighbor as you love yourself. And so as far as she's concerned, Christ is immoral because it was a life of self-sacrifice and serving others and

um that's what he tells us to do look if you even have a free market system uh and of course we don't have a free market system we have a crony capitalist system but if you have a free market system and in at the purest level of free market it would be the mom and pop stores in a situation where you know you've got something that is kind of new hasn't been around for a while we were kind of found ourselves in that situation with the video stores this is something new and the big wall street companies had not come in yet eventually they did with blockbuster and other things like that but at the beginning it was a pure competition between a lot of different mom and pops and how do you succeed in that well you put your customer first that means you put their interest ahead of yours and then you find that when you are focused on serving other people then things come back but now people are focused not on serving

other customers i mean look at the contempt that corporations have for their own customers look at um bud light or look at nascar whatever they absolutely hate their customers they know what their demographics are and they shove it in their face things that their demographic is going to find extremely offensive and so uh the reality is is that they have always um uh you know if we look at uh greed and selfishness they're not virtues and yet she wrote a book called the virtue of selfishness it was actually a collection of essays from her and her philosophy this is why you know i i call myself libertarian um i like a lot of things uh from the libertarian philosophy that are about liberty but uh the libertarians

themselves uh the small l libert, many of them are caught up in objectivism, which is a philosophy that I absolutely reject. It is not objective. It is subjective. It celebrates greed. It celebrates selfishness. It puts ego as the code of ethics, according to her. And she sought to destroy all altruism. You know, Jesus said to his disciples when he said to him, who will be the greatest? And he said, well, that's not the way, that's the way the Gentile nations organize themselves. That's not the way it is to be to you. The greater view should serve the lesser.

That's what i said that was the ethics of our christian government at least you know when we talk about government servants that was the idea that they would see themselves as servants not as somebody that is there to fulfill their own personal ambition and their own greed and their own ego, which is what we've got. How do you like politicians like that? Cause that's all we've got left now, right? Pretty much at the top. We got to take a look at Biden or Lala or Trump.

That's what we've got, isn't it? And so part of her, um, cult there of objectivism was Alan Greenspan. And, uh, and when we look at what has happened with selfishness,

just look at how this has been embraced, even to the extent that we don't pay any attention to even the self-sacrifice of family. As a matter of fact, it's gotten to such ridiculous extremes. And it's especially true with women who are leaving the church in record numbers they say it used to be that you know men when they would get into youth they would walk away from the church but the women would stay it's just the opposite now it's just collapsing

and they're not paying they don't want kids they don't want to get married they don't want to have kids it's all about me me me even to the extent that those who do have kids in the uk 25 of them are sending their kids to start school now this is kindergarten i don't know how early they started but they're sending their kids 25 of them are sending their kids and they're not even potty trained they don't bother to train them to use the toilet which which makes your job a little bit easier, doesn't it? I mean, why would you do that? Why would you just say, well, it's all about your own personal ambitions or whatever. And, you know, people feel that they need to have everybody working so they can pay the taxes for the government.

That's the big lie that the government sells you. The ideas of career and independence and it's all about me. They don't even want to train their kids. And of course, it may be that they're sending them off at an extremely early age. That's a problem in itself, isn't it? I don't want to deal with them. I've got my own things that I've got to do. And many of them feel hard-pressed to do it because they feel that i've got to do and many of them feel hard pressed to do

it because they feel like they've got to do it to make ends meet because they've been sold a bill of goods well when we look at selfishness and greed i think we do have a society that is built around that uh and around sexual gratification i think that pretty much sums it up, doesn't it? You know, I've played this before. This is a video that's really aged pretty well. I did this back in 2008 or 2009. You know, 15, 16 years ago. And there was the Ayn Rand Institute had a competition about Atlas Shrugged to celebrate it with some anniversary that it had. And so they had a competition. And so I did this video as part of the competition

because I thought, yeah, I understand. I don't like Atlas Shrugged and I don't like objectivism. I don't like selfishness and greed. They're not virtues. But I understand the free market aspects of it, so I thought, well, I can do that part of it. I understood the idea that government is going to take over and direct industry, which I certainly disagree with. So I thought, well, I can do something on those themes. And as I said said it's aged pretty well um i said 2030 was when everything was going to come apart and we kind of look at it backwards

from the economic standpoint because yes you should not take out of the mouth of labor the bread that it has earned and that's what what these Marxists and socialists did. So here's the little thing that I did about Ayn Rand and Atlas Shrugged about 15, 16 years ago. I remember America. Sure, you can still find it on a map, but nobody older than 20 thinks this is America. Even if coordinates are the same, we've lost our compass. You don't have a direction without reference, a true north. For America, it was liberty.

When we lost the love of liberty, our understanding of liberty, it was just a matter of time before the rest of it was lost. Some think it started when the auto companies were nationalized or the police state to control the internet or when certain companies couldn't fail because their relationship with politicians made them too big to fail and the rest of us without political influence were too small to succeed. Sure that all happened pretty quickly over just a couple of years but liberty had been gradually devolving for decades. Some of the more astute, like Ayn Rand, saw it about 50 years before others. She warned us, but people didn't believe it could happen here until it did.

Laws had been used to loot productive individuals and businesses, but in the new millennium, under Bush, then Obama, graft, corruption, and crony capitalism were no longer hidden behind closed doors. The looters and their laws came out of hiding like rabid animals that were no longer afraid of humans. It was brought into the spotlight, and it was celebrated as enlightened economic policy. Ayn Rand asked the question at Atlas Shrugged that the rest of us were asking 60 years later. Which failing financial institution will the administration pluck from the flames of crisis? And which will it let roast? Which market or investment technique will the regulators bless? And which, in a capricious change of rules, will it condemn or outlaw? As John Galt said in his radio address,

you decided you had a right to your wages, but we had no right to our profits. You called it selfish and cruel that men should trade value for value. You've now established an unselfish society where they trade extortion for extortion. People who had never produced or managed anything tried to manage every aspect of our lives, and they brought production to a standstill. And eventually, they decided to micromanage the food supply in the name of fairness and safety. And we all know what happened then fiction can be a powerful influence for good or bad it's too bad more people didn't read atlas shrugged they might have realized where this was heading well and of course politics is downstream from the spiritual. And if you focus your world on selfishness and greed,

it's going to be those kind of people who are going to take over the government and use it as a weapon. As I was just saying, the intervention to help parents with toilet training in the UK, one in four kids starting school in September without being toilet trained. Because it's all about me.

I can't even bother to do that. Pupils on average are losing a third of their learning time each day due to teachers diverting away from teaching and towards supporting children who are not school-ready. Yeah, maybe they are a little bit too early. We do know that there are some children who can't be toilet trained for medical reasons. I think that was a case when i was in third grade we had the cuban missile crisis a little bump in the road

very memorable when you're that age very impressionable and we all had to take even though i could walk home in about five minutes um we all had to take a change of clothes with us in case there was a nuclear war. And they weren't hazmat suits either. It was just like a second set of pants. And I remember this one kid wetting his pants and was like, what? He had to use his Cuban Missile Crisis pants to change the thing. But, you know, I think he had a problem. Of course, kids did not realize that at the time.

So they've actually got a charity to help people to, and again, not to help people, but to train the kids for the parents because the parents can't do anything for themselves. So a charity has launched a summer campaign all aboard the toilet train. Thomas the Toilet Tank, I guess, is going to be featured on there. Because parents won't do it for their kids. They won't train their kids. They've got to have somebody else do it for them. We're becoming completely helpless, aren't we?

As more and more we focus on ourselves more and more helpless we become it's really important that children and families are given support to make this happen a little bit earlier so when they start school they're ready for their learning so they can make friends and they can engage and they can develop to the next stages you know when we to China, we were warned by our friends who had adopted twice from there. And things are starting to rapidly change. So we really didn't see that too much. But they said, you're going to see, they don't put pants or diapers or anything on their kids.

They just let them walk around and, you know, drop their load along the road and go away contented, you know. So it's, but it was starting to, that was starting to end when we went there. But as I thought about that, and I thought about this, it's kind of, you know, if you don't have any freedom in your life, and if you don't take responsibility for others then you kind of just become passive and that's what all this universal basic income and artificial intelligence is really about it's really about pacifying us we're not given any work or responsibility we don't even take

responsibility for our kids we don't even want to bother changing their diapers just don't put pants on them just let them you know walk down the street uh bottomless or whatever um but uh when you look at how passive we've become uh an article from this is from yahoo um fragile GPS is a massive vulnerability for the West, and Putin knows it. Oh, let's put it in a Russian context here. And they said, what would happen if we lost control of time? It's like, what? Yeah, time and position is a GPS stuff. But think about that. Think about how dependent we've become on it,

how we don't really, we just pull out the map app and it takes us to where we want to go. We don't try to figure it out ourselves or refer to a map or anything like that. And so it is a kind of dependency that they put us on. You go back years ago and they would talk about taxi drivers in London. London is this hodgepodge of short little streets that all have different names. It's just evolved over the centuries. And so you don't have, you know, numbered streets that are like they've all got individual names.

And sometimes it's a very short street and now it connects up to another street and it immediately changes names. It gets very complicated. So these taxi drivers would have to do what they called the knowledge and they would ride around for a very long time on bicycles and memorize all these this this complicated map of london and they would have to have somebody in the car with them in order to get their taxi license. Somebody would say, take me to such and such a place. And they'd have to be able to do that from memory without consulting anything. And so they said when they looked,

everybody was impressed with their detailed ability to do that before GPS. And they would look at their, they actually, some people looked at their brains and found that one part of their brain, I forget which part it was, was much larger than it was in other people. They were able to train that. But it's like a muscle. And if we don't use it, it atrophies. And that's what this is about. The fragile GPS.

How we become so totally dependent on this complicated infrastructure. We become like hg wells time machine we have become the eloy of the future and these helpless little things that are out there built by the u.s military to guide missiles precisely but opened up for civilian use two decades ago uh and uh they said without this timing, the energy grid would falter and collapse. How did we do that before? How did we have a power grid that was more reliable and wasn't concerned about shortages?

Yeah, we didn't have GPS, and we had a power grid that you could trust. As the system needs to balance volatile renewables, this says. Yeah, they're constantlyables, this says. Yeah, they're constantly changing, constantly varying. And it needs to maintain a constant frequency. So again, we have the ones that have become fragile. It's not GPS.

This is coming out of the UK as Admiral West, Lord West of Spithead. That's not a joke. I mean, that is when the spit hits the fan, I guess. That's what we're talking about. If the GPS goes down, Lord Spithead explained to Westminster two years ago, the impact of the loss of PNT is almost existential. Banking, trade, transactions, all areas of transport and food supply would all be affected in incomplete chaos. These are the people who had set up Greenwich Mean Time. If you've ever been to Greenwich, the museum that is there, it's very interesting.

They have the Azera Meridian line. You can straddle that. It's all about clocks. And when the British were ruling the waves and had the big maritime power, Greenwich, the exhibit that was there, at least when we went there 44 years ago, I don't know what's there now. It's probably, they've dumbed it down. Nobody knows.

What's that? Oh, that's an analog clock. You ever seen one of those before? But they had this big competition about how they were going to tell time on a ship. Because, you know, the ship is rolling and pitching and all this other kind of stuff. And most of their clocks use pendulums. It became a big issue and a big competition. They wound up stealing it from the person who won the design.

But that's another story. And so, you know, it was not only the pitch and everything of the movement of the ship, but it was also the harsh environment. A lot of humidity and all the rest of this stuff. You know, see, they're on the sea. These are wooden ships. People have been able to overcome these types of difficulties, and yet we have become Eloi, haven't we?

Like I said, the strength of those signals is less than some of the cosmic signals coming from the stars. They can therefore be intercepted and adjusted very easily. The Chinese and the Russians have already done this. So just intercept those things and broadcast something a little bit stronger. Imitation of that. Get people confused. So they said Russia is probing the spectrum.

Well, this article itself may be probing the public. It may be predictive programming there could be outside threats and there are outside threats and of course you know the russians and the chinese if we're going to provoke a war yeah they would be involved in that as well but of course our own government is not above provoking a war with us so it could be predictive programming about that it's just another one of these threats like emp or like a cyber attack or even our own government shutting down the power on the grid uh could be a cyber attack or it could be direct sabotage of people coming through the open border it's very simple very easy by the way it's another reason to look at civil defense manual.com i had jack lawson on on friday you can go to that website civil defense manual.com you can see uh some of the things that

he has there he's got some chapters there for free uh one on water very critical and that is the sort of thing that is really uh you need to think about these things. Because the government's not going to protect you against any of this stuff. They're not going to do anything about EMP. They're not going to do anything about an attack on GPS or the fragile supply chain that we have. They're not going to do anything to protect us against direct sabotage or cyber attack or any of this stuff so again uh you need to be aware of these

threats and to uh take some preparatory action on it well we're going to take a quick break and when we come back we're going to continue with the news and i want to get into um the the dnc d and c i guess their celebration of uh you, who would have thought it was an interesting comment from LifeSite News. Who would have thought just a few years ago that the Democrats would have made as their central issue the murder of children? You know, even Bill Clinton had enough decency. He tried to run from it, from it, but not anymore. That's now the thing that they celebrate. We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show well we find out that at the um trump rally and the shooting that happened there one man

killed two people you know i haven't heard any follow-up on the two people that were shot initial word was that they were critically injured but of course they don't matter you know it's just only trump and you know the speculation about what happened, you know, did it come from, you know, the Republicans say, well, this was set up by the Biden administration. They allowed it to happen or they attempted this. The Democrats will say Trump set this up himself. You know, again, everything is going to be focused on these two types of things ready to go to war with each other.

Well, it was a local cop, not a Secret Service agent, who shot the person on the roof first, wounded him. And they said that the kill shot was given to the Secret Service sniper, counter sniper, but that the initial shot that stopped him was done by a local SWAT operator. They call him an operator. Wow. And that he also hit his gun, you know, like in the Westerns where they hit the gun, knock it out of the guy's hand. Maybe that's true. I don't know i am uh i'm not really buying any of this stuff one way or the other i don't know what happened i'm just looking to see how

they're going to use it perhaps the secret service agent that was supposed to be doing this was actually somewhere chest feeding a baby you know they've had a Secret Service agent who was nursing a baby at the Trump campaign event in North Carolina. Because, you know, that's moms. You got moms now protecting politicians. Isn't this kind of upside down and backwards? i thought we were supposed to have politicians kissing babies not having uh their nursing moms out there using their bodies as shields for a president what i mean this is you know part of this is like you look at it and it's like yeah okay this is uh this is incompetence they said they've also had agents caught sleeping on the job at mar-a-Lago and director Kim Cheadle, former director,

wanted to have 30% of the Secret Service be women by 2030. And yet, you know, when you look at this, it's kind of like the boxing thing. As I said, it's repulsive to see a man who is you know chemically genetically a man i see a person like that beating up a woman as part of sports uh and yet the other question is why do they have women beating up women that's just uh i don't know i'm kind of old school why do we have women especially a woman who's got a young baby and needs to be nursing it uh why is she being used as a bodyguard for a man of all things it's absolutely insane well let's take a look at what is going on with the dnc uh we had biden on the first night and a lot of people were saying well that was a sign of disrespect the the Republican press is doing everything it can to show that it is a failure and it's

pretty easy actually it's a low bar to be able to show that it's a failure but the the Democrat press is talking about how wonderful a love fest it is and everything the Republicans point out that he they had him on the very first night which a a very low position and that they didn't even have anybody go over his biography he had to do it himself uh and it was a pretty difficult thing for him actually he struggled uh here is biden talking about women and power and he gets the whole power thing mixed up as to which power he's talking about quote women are not without electrical not allowed not without electoral electoral political power no please clap no kidding

yeah yeah yeah women don't have any power let's fix that let's elect her it's so important all these people from hollywood it's so important that we get a woman in why why does that make any difference i mean you know um anyway uh yeah electrical power he's so focused on taking electrical power away from people is that what it was is that kind of like a freudian slip he did that at one point he started talking about it's going to be a dark winter and uh is that a freudian slip is he referring back to the first germ game when he's talking about locking everybody down? Well, you just can't criticize the didn't earn it.

D.I. stuff, because people are weaponizing racist, sexist and all the rest of stuff to such a degree. You have a Vanderbbilt professor a professor of black studies is that racist uh who calls a gop congresswoman racist because of the way that she pronounces lala's name you know there's a lot of different pronunciations you can call her kami law or Kami law or just Lala, but, uh, you know, they, they demand that you call her Kamala Kami law. And,

uh, they, uh, they don't like it. If you call her Kamala, well, uh, how is that racist?

Vanderbilt, African American studies professor, uh, Michael Dyson, uhon said that nancy grace was being disrespectful and racist by mispronouncing her name she is a congresswoman from south carolina he said you are part of the quote legacy of white disregard for the humanity of black people for saying kamala instead of kamala kamilala kamilala uh so kamila kamilala or just simply lala as in oh well yeah kind of space cadet lala um so mace subsequently was called disrespectful with Dyson adding,

we don't call you Nancy Machi. Their name is Mace. But isn't Kamila, isn't that a made up name? I don't know. I've never heard of anybody else with that name. He says, I know you don't intend it to be that way. That's the history and the legacy of white disregard for the humanity of black people, he said. And she said, oh, so now you're calling me a racist.

That's BS. That's complete BS. And he responded, you don't have to intend racism to accomplish it, to be guilty of it to be guilty of it your disrespect of kamilala is part of a tradition of disrespect you see what he's talking about here is the idea of unconscious bias by your very white skin you are unconsciously. You're evil because of your skin color, you say. And this is this unconscious bias is a way that they can attack you. It's kind of a passive aggressive way of attacking people.

Well, I know you don't intend it and I know that you don't even think that, but you're that nevertheless. You're racist. Even though you harbor no ill will or prejudice against people, you're still racist because you're white. That's what they've been selling with the unconscious bias.

Later in the clip, Dyson insists that Mace pronounce Commie Lala's name. And when she doesn't, the panel in unison shouts, Communist Lala, Communist Lala. No, actually, it's something similar to that said you're doing this on purpose aren't you congresswoman well she may or may not have been doing it on purpose i do it on purpose um it was uh you know you go back and you look at george hw bush right he's coming after saddam hussein He called him Saddam instead of Saddam, right? And he did that as an intentional dig. Many people said, and I believe that he did.

He didn't call him Saddam. He called him Saddam. The professor then challenged Mace to pronounce her name correctly. After she did not, he said, you're a white woman disrespecting a black woman. You're a bad person. I'm going to wish you into the cornfield. We live in that twilight zone, don't we? Well, here's the deal.

As Shakespeare said, a communist by any other name is still red. 292-page report shows thatiden has committed impeachable offenses maybe they could have shortened it a little bit and gotten it out on time it's like years late okay uh we knew this before the 2020 election and i said they've waited too long they would think that they're going to throw this thing out there as an october surprise it's people aren't going to with the media pushed against them you know they dropped all the stuff about the hunter biden laptop and all the rest of the stuff they thought they had the democrats i said you waited too long uh and they miss underestimated as George H George W Bush would say they miss underestimated the, uh, the loyalty and the power of the mainstream

media to bury it, to push back against it. Uh, we, we knew about that, uh, long, long before. And in the summer I was still saying, you know, when are they going to release this stuff about the Biden corruption? And they didn't. They didn't do it until October. Well, this is a 292 page report about all the impeachable offenses of Biden. So what are they going to do about it?

Are the Republicans going to impeach Biden and remove him so they can make Lala president? I don't know that they want to do that um and uh you know because it's all about um it's all about the election at this point um well um was this were the impeachable offenses that everybody knew about was this the leverage that the Democrats were using against him? They might have done it with a hard leverage. They might have said, you step down and we're going to expose everything that we know about you. He's blackmailable.

That's one of the things that they're always looking for politicians. People like Dennis Hastert, who was a known pedophile wrestling coach in high school. They put him in Congress because he's blackmailable. They put him as Speaker of the House because he's blackmailable. And they kept him as the longest Speaker of the House for the Republicans because he was blackmailable. Well, Biden was blackmailable and controlled. And so they could tell him, all right, now it's time for you to step down. He has to do it.

But it could have been a soft, they could have presented to him in a soft way. If you don't step down, we're going to lose our majority in Congress. And Trump will get elected. Look at where you are in the polls. And Trump's going to put you in jail. So you better step down and let us pick who we think is going to win. I think that really was the situation. And so the question is, are they going to have him step down?

I don't think that they will do the 25th Amendment. Some people are talking about that. You've already got the New York Times talking about how this was a coup. If the Democrats were to come out and force him out of the Oval Office for La La, I think that'd be a step too far even for the Democrats, because already, like I said, the New York Times is saying it was a coup. So will the Republicans do that? I think it would be to their disadvantage.

So when you, this article from Breitbart says, House Speaker Mike Johnson must now determine if he should take action on the report's findings. If Johnson launches House impeachment proceedings, it would throw a new wrinkle into the presidential election cycle by forcing Democrats and Vice President Lala to spend time and energy defending an outgoing president they wouldn't do that you know as president biden and the biden harris administration obstructed the house's impeachment inquiry and the criminal investigation into the hunter biden and to hunter biden according to the report well look attacking biden isn't going to harm lala at all. And I think it'll backfire on the Republicans if they were to do something like that. I think it'll backfire on public opinion,

and I think putting her in the presidency would backfire on them as well. And everybody knows all this stuff. It isn't like this is going to be some new revelation. I mean, the bottom line is, most of us who follow politics, most of us knew uh who follow politics most of us knew about the hunter biden corruption and the biden corruption i mean it was open story about biden saying yeah you know i told them to get rid of that prosecutor and that type of thing

so we knew about all that stuff and i've been talking about the connections of Biden and Obama and the DNC to the corrupt people in Ukraine, as well as to China and all the rest of the stuff. So that isn't going to buy them anything. The key thing, I think, and it truly is amazing to find ourselves there, is the fact that this has all been about the celebration of abortion. To the extent that Babylon Bee actually did this picture here. The DNC dyes the Chicago River red in order to celebrate abortion. Well, that's pretty true.

And they would if they could, wouldn't they? I mean, they have dyed, I think on St. Patrick's Day, they have a lot of Irish people, used to anyway, in Chicago. And so they had big St. Patrick's Day and they would dump green dye. Um, but it was never as thorough as this Photoshopped picture here. Uh, the decision was made to turn the river blood colored for the party's convention as a striking visual to emphasize the Democrats unending commitment to slaughtering defenseless babies in as large quantities as possible, writes the Babylon Bee. Quote, turning the Chicago River blood red is the perfect way

to celebrate our party's national convention and remind everyone just how excited we get about killing babies, said the DNC chair. We're just bummed that we couldn't use actual baby blood. So keep killing those babies, officials say the red chicago river would not only show the party's enthusiasm for baby murder but also serve as a visual preview of the tidal wave of communism the party would seek to usher in if kami lala is elected we're all about the red said kami uh the blood of innocent children and unbridled communism. Bring on the red. That's a pet peeve of mine.

All these people who wear red caps and wear red states and wear red this and wear red that. underscores how absolutely clueless the MAGA and Republican base is about history, about communism, about the power of the media. They accept any label that is put on them, and they have absolutely no historical context for any of the issues or the political parties or any of this stuff. They don't understand how they're being played. Totally clueless, walking around in their communist caps. Democrats still might invoke the 25th Amendment to make Harris president, says the Hill. I don't think that's going to happen. I really don't. I think that is way too far.

Many now view President Biden as a broken man, walking alone in a deep valley of depression, confusion, and anger, says the Hill. It's been that way for a long time. Because, you see, the one legacy that is important of the Biden administration, this is starting to explain to people, even Joe Rogan can see that the idea of a president who is quote unquote running the country is pure myth. He's not running anything. There are people who are running him. He's just a marketing puppet, a guy up front. And so we had Harris's campaign is now requiring everybody who works for her to get a COVID shot. Even though we know they don't work, we know we don't have COVID.

We know how dangerous they are. She's still demanding this. That is assuming that you can get a job with her if you can work out what your pronouns are. Remember, she's got nine different pronoun groups that you can choose. And if that's not enough, you can write in your own made-up pronouns. And then if you're that stupid to work for her, she's going to inject you as well. Harris for president requires all employees to be up to date on COVID-19 vaccination status as prescribed by the CDC as a condition of employment, unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law, says her campaign website.

Well, you know, we do have the Bill of rights and other things like that that should apply but of course it never really applied with her remember when uh you had mainstream media reporters begging her uh to uh for her and biden to put in a vaccine passport well they got it in france speaking of global health we're all wearing masks in this room, except for you. The French, which is fine. The French essentially have a vaccine passport that has allowed public life here to return to some semblance of normalcy. All of us with you. What's normal about France?

Before we traveled here. Should the United States have such a requirement? Well, we have, as you know, been very careful to guide public policy where it is our role to guide it based on what the scientists and medical professionals tell us. And we are also leaving it, as you know, to local communities in large part to make those decisions. I think the most important thing at this moment for us in the United States to focus on is that we now have the ability for children to get the vaccination, the shot. We have at our disposal the ability to actually engage in smart public health conduct and protocols. And we have free, safe vaccines available for everyone. And our biggest challenge right now is to urge everyone to engage in saving their life

and the life of their family members and their communities by getting vaccinated. But that's really, and it has been, it's no secret, one of our biggest challenges. And we will continue to focus on that. Yeah, well, you know, we can't be as good as the french of course everybody looks to the french for freedom and sanity right uh but you notice what she had to say there well it is our role to guide public policy uh no it isn't it's not your role to guide public policy about health at all. Based on science, no. Based on these institutions that say that they represent science.

And the other thing I want to point out to you, leaving it in large part to local people, right? That was a plan. That was a plan from day one. That was a plan when they practiced all this stuff two months before 9-11. One week after 9-11, the anthrax attack, and then two months later, they put out the model legislation to all the states. Why? Because they don't have the authority to dictate this to people.

They can pay state and local government to do whatever they want and we have seen this when you look at putting the boys in the girls bathrooms or any other policy that they want to dictate they do it by funding it they do it by enticement and by bribery and that was what trump was doing as well that's the way this thing rolls out and so um yeah uh all about the vaccine passports well we will do it in the american way what we do is we don't mandate that we pay local places to engage the tyranny on you we pay them to punish you that's why i say if you think that you're going your vote and get all tied up about what's going on with the presidential race this is a myth folks and you can focus all of your energy on trump versus lala and uh you're going to be uh in a bad way when whatever is being bribed out of Washington comes to the local level.

You better have some officials at the local level who are not going to take the bribe. Who understand that they don't want a society like that. Who are going to stand in the gap. And we saw that happening in 2020. Standing against the bribery of the Trump administration. Standing against the guidance of science from the Trump administration. Yes, get involved in politics to protect yourself and your family, but do it at the local level. You're not going to have you think that your money that you're sending to help this, if

you're going to send money and you think that's going to have an effect with all these billionaires lined up and buying their place at the table? You know, I got Trump saying, well, maybe I'll put Musk in and give him a cabinet position. And he says, oh, I'd love to do that. We set it up as the Department of Government Efficiency as a joke. And he puts it as D- g e doge like the doge coin right which he's joked about but look if he got in uh to politics anymore i think that is ultimately his ambition to get in in some way or form he's not got he doesn't want to waste his

time being a congressman or a senator or anything like that. But, you know, he can pull the strings on these politicians. As H.L. Mencken said, every election is an advanced auction of stolen goods. Who's stealing the stuff? It's the billionaires. They buy a place at the table. They get their tax breaks. They get their subsidies. They get their government contracts.

They get the government to leave them alone to do what they want. All these different things that are happening. And, of course, Musk is the king of crony capitalism. He became the world's richest man by operating that system. And so, folks, you're not going to have any effect whatsoever on the race. And Musk even had the candor to tell people Soros is getting focused on local elections because even Soros doesn't have that much leverage at the federal level. So if he really wants to have societal change, Soros is going to do it by putting in district attorneys who are going to facilitate lawless chaos by letting criminals out and not prosecuting them.

That's the plan. And so how do you stop this? The place, interestingly enough, and he even said it. He said, you know, at the local level, your vote represents a bigger proportion of things than in any other place you know the closer and more local it gets to you the bigger percentage your vote is you know you still might be you know one of 20 000 people or something in an area but that's better than one and 300 million and so you can have an effect there and that's where this is all going to roll out that's where biden and trump did it was at the local level and so um this article from

life site news talking about you know recanting everybody explaining uh that yeah they're still pushing still pushing covid still pushing vaccines, pushing it on their employees. And they said the CDC is currently recommending for the 2023 to 2024 updated COVID vaccines are recommending Pfizer, Moderna, and Novavax. And I was reminded yesterday, after I talked about Dr. Peter McCullough, and how he was shamelessly pushing the hype and the fear about gain of function. I see the ads all the time on these conservative sites like Zero Hedge and stuff. Pushing fear. And, and you know you can get your stock up your ivermectin now it's like fine get ivermectin uh sell ivermectin like i said yesterday sell ivermectin sell people storable food but don't push fear in order to do it don't

tell them no it yeah there's a real thing to be afraid of you should be afraid of what the government might do but don't be afraid of the vaccines don't be i mean don't be afraid of you should be afraid of what the government might do but don't be afraid of the vaccines don't be i mean don't be afraid of the virus don't be afraid of some weaponized virus be afraid of the vaccine that is the bioweapon and that's not what he's done i was reminded yesterday that he pushed novavax here's a tweet from uh october of 2021 and um uh this is the c19 expert group they put this out please see these results of novavax 90 efficacy and less than one percent develop a fever after the injection safety profile looks better than the current vaccines let me know your thoughts well i think you're a vaccine shill how about that mccullough you kind of put that stuff up you haven't done any tests on this stuff you know

better than that you know that they didn't really test vaccines ever for uh sufficiently even though they used to run the test for years it still wasn't sufficient so i put this thing i was like oh yeah look at this you know we shot a bunch of people and they didn't die immediately. So I guess it's safe, right? He's pushing that kind of garbage to people. And then this also pushing Molnupiravir. These names that the pharmaceutical companies come up with. As absurd as their science.

This is as late as December 24 uh 24th 2022 christmas eve christmas eve peter mccullough is pushing this molnuprevir and this is something that of course has not been tested it's still under emergency use authorization where's the emergency dr mccullough come on 2022 there never was an emergency and uh so yeah he's referring says um um they deleted a molnu pervier uh minor prednisolone dosing change. The WHO and the NIH, after three years, have no multidrug ambulatory protocol. The most critical element of pandemic response. He's pushing pandemic fear all the time.

All the time. Regardless of what he is selling, that is reprehensible. To push the lies and the fears about the pandemic. There was no pandemic, Dr. McCullough. Start telling the truth. The CDC's continued warnings against serious COVID infection, along

with the controlled opposition and the mainstream alternative media. That's the phrase that David Icke used, and he's absolutely right these people have taken uh they they are absolutely controlled the mainstream alternative media cdc's continued warning against the quote-unquote serious covid infection contrasts with a description of the virus by on-the-ground doctors as exceedingly mild. Dr. Eric Eiding told NBC last fall regarding his urgent care patients,

he said, quote, just about everyone who I've seen has had really mild symptoms. The only way that we knew there was COVID was because we happened to be testing them. Yes, an intelligence test. If you're going to fall for the pcr if you're gonna fall for the mainstream media as the meme goes uh the amish don't suffer from the pandemic because they don't have television so the democrats began the night by celebrating tim wall's stolen valor at the dnc it's absolutely amazing they actually doubled down on his claiming that he retired with a higher rank and he didn't

we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back back. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we're going to talk a bit more about the dnc and about tim walser's more has come to light about his love of the chi comms the chinese communists uh more of that has resurfaced some amazing things about him and about his um stolen valor but before we get into that i just want to think real quickly some of the people who sent us checks on the second week of august i'll just read the um uh first name and last initial uh aaron w david and debbie w mark c karen c jeremy w margaret uh mary t uh martin k lloyd p patricia w joan and david f sue k thank you all so much i really appreciate it we could not do this without your support that is a key uh thing for us we don't have sponsors i mean you know i had a situation where um we had a sponsor and i had to disavow them or whatever you know like

mccullough or something but um so it really is your donation that keeps this program going so the democrats as i said before we went to the break are celebrating his stolen valor and i mean they celebrate it they doubled down he was introduced at the dnc aapi caucus meeting as command sergeant major that is a rank above what he retired with the person who announced it even took a minute to make sure when she said it she said quote a title that is very important to me command sergeant major but he never completed the requirements for the rank and so they dropped him before he retired a day before he retired but much worse than that is his justification of china's one child policy don't tell me that you're all about power for women and you want to stand for women

and for women's freedom and all the rest of the stuff. When you defend the forced abortions of China, when you defend a policy that resulted in what many people termed gender side, the murder of baby girls or the abandonment of baby girls that's always there was so much adoption of children in china because of the one child policy and they said well we want to have a boy if it's going to be one child and so they abandoned the girls to the orphanages that was a result of this chinese policy and of course where did that chinese policy come from this fear about too many people the depopulation agenda that drives everything the depopulation agenda that drives all of these mcguffins whether it's the pandemic mcguffin or the climate mcguffin it all ultimately comes back

to they want to kill you they want to reduce the population because it's too hard for them to control us if we outnumber them to such a degree yeah they may have a tremendous advantage in terms of weaponry and technology and hugo de garis when he said well you know people figure out what the elites are doing to them they're going to come after them and the elites are going to use their superior technology because it'll be horrific you'll have giga death billions of people killed by the elites but guess what yeah it's almost what is it eight or nine billion people they can't get us all and they know that so they want to reduce the population down to a size where they could kill us all if we revolted against them that's the simple um basis of everything that they're doing and um oh today is deb mccartney's birthday well happy birthday to you brian and deb happy birthday deb um a few years ago says life site news it would have been

unthinkable to have abortion be the centerpiece of a presidential campaign as i said earlier but that's exactly what is happening just think back you know had during the clinton administration even bill clinton was saying well we need to refer to abortion we want to make it legal but rare uh but now they've embraced the right to kill unborn babies and you know as this stuff is happening as they make abortion the centerpiece of the campaign um what are the republicans saying about it you say much from the republican press i mean life site news we'll talk about it's a catholic publication um but um pretty much it's um the republicans don't want to talk about abortion. They see it as a losing issue.

Why? Well, because you can't fight something if you're running away from it. You're shot in the back, and deservedly so. Now, the Republicans, they can talk about Tim Walz running away from his responsibility to go to Iraq. But the Republicans are running away from protecting innocent life. They don't want to do it. Trump and the GOP in general. So, Harrison Walls have gone even further.

They've elevated this so-called right above all others, including the ones that are listed in the Bill of Rights. They don't support any freedom. Reason got that right, finally. I've been saying it for years democrats don't support any so-called right except the right to kill your child and they see it now as a religious ceremony r-i-t-e a woman's most fundamental right says la la it trumps freedom of speech, freedom of religion, even freedom of conscience, says LifeSiteNews.

And it really does. On Rumble, Michelle Obama, thank you very much. She says, a thousand people watching now. Awesome. Well, that's great. Thank you all. And I appreciate people sharing and liking and sharing the broadcast. That's what makes that possible.

It's really you doing that. And it is vital for people to do that. So I really do appreciate that. So they want to overturn pro-life laws in dozens of states. They want to impose their radical views on the entire nation. They want to increase funding for Planned Parenthood and at the same time shut down crisis pregnancy centers, jail people who are peaceful protesters, grandmothers

in wheelchairs, and the rest of the stuff, arrest women in the UK, a woman who was silently praying at one of their sacred child sacrifice sites. You want to know what their religion is? Pretty easy to tell, isn't it? At a time when American birth rates are at historic lows, Lala is still concerned about what she calls population growth. It's not growing. And thanks to their vaccination,

thanks to their mind games and propaganda that they have put on people, the population is shrinking. At a time when even China has decided that it wants more, games and propaganda that they have put on people. Population is shrinking at a time when even China has decided that it wants more, not fewer babies. Lala thinks it makes sense for young people to avoid having children because of climate change. Well, again, climate change was always about depopulation, always about depopulation always about depopulation um one uh tim waltz has deep connections to the chinese communist party writes uh life site news and we know that

he's an admirer of the communist regime he's traveled to china 30 times i talked about that the other day but they say that china paid for it he did it on china's dime says life site news i didn't know that and the person who was talking about it you know again he made sure that he got local press coverage that he was taking a group of kids to china and that type of thing but he dearly loved china he got married on the anniversary of tinaman square he honeymooned in china just like i said what is it about all these democrat marxists de blasio honeymoons in cuba bernie sanders honeymoons in the soviet union before uh communism fell they love it so much you know yeah okay i i love this, but I'm really married to communism.

That's why I want to spend my honeymoon in a communist state. Cuba, China, Russia. So they actually paid for it. China actually paid for his trips. This is the very definition of a fellow traveler well you know i can see this happening because uh the islamic cultist uh fatala gulen uh from turkey and he was at one time an ally of erdogan and then they became uh political opponents fatala gulen had to leave the country the cia well they were going to the state department was going to block Fattah al-Ghulam

from coming to the United States. And the CIA wrote letters and got him in. And now he's got a compound up in Pennsylvania. But he has a series of schools. He's got over 1,000 schools, well over 1,000 schools worldwide. Everywhere except the United States, they are run as religious schools, well over a thousand schools worldwide, everywhere except the United States. They are run as religious schools, as madrasas, because he is this, you know, he's an imam, he's a Muslim imam. And in the U.S., they call them schools of science and math.

And there have been a lot of allegations about criminal corruption and other things in terms of the people that they bring in as teachers and what are they really teaching the kids in the schools part of that is that they give free trips to politicians and free trips to the best and the brightest in their schools to indoctrinate them to love turkey that's what uh tim wallace was doing with china and so of course you know china pays for that uh the glenist pay for it and um mark hall did an excellent documentary killing ed talking about how the fatala gulen cult has been able to use public money, government money, and Texas especially. Texas more than anywhere else. They have exploited school choice laws there.

And this organization is getting massive amounts of money. Last I saw it years ago, last time I covered it, it was up to about $750 million. They're probably over a billion dollars now from texas so that this islamic cult can educate kids and call it science and math so unlike biden waltz's connections with the communist chinese is more ideological than financial he truly loves it as that person who went with him as a high school student said he was you know just giddy collecting all the mal's little red books and all the rest of the other stuff even more troubling he was in china during the heyday of china's now defunct one

child policy which involved forced and late-term abortions even infanticide but instead of condemning it he did everything in his power to justify it the one child policy was necessary wall said because quote the chinese population was so large so what are they going to do to us you know they got their ways uh they've got their ways to kill us with the injections and other things he also falsely claimed that the only consequence of having more than one child was that, quote, the family pays a tax, unquote. It was a ruinous tax, by the way. It was more than the annual wage

of most of the people in China if you were caught with a child. But he just calls it a tax. So that tells you something about his tax policy as well, doesn't it? If you tax people more than their annual wage as a fine for having too many kids, well, it's just a tax. Nothing to worry about. Throughout the time that Walls was making repeated visits to China,

women were being hunted down for the crime of being pregnant without permission. And they were being taken by force to abortion centers. I know, says the writer, because I was there. Taking a leaf out of China's book as Governor, Walls overturned a Minnesota law that made it a crime to force a woman to get an abortion.

As governor, he not only endorsed abortion up to birth, he gave free reign to men to coerce women into unwanted abortions when they are the most vulnerable emotionally and financially echoing pete booty gay tim waltz thinks that the abortion has been a good thing for men it certainly has enabled some of them to avoid taking responsibility for getting a young woman pregnant. Lala and Waltz are, in short, death peddlers, writes Stephen Mosher,

president of the Population Research Institute, author of The Devil and Communist China. Boy, that's a target-rich isn't it right there uh he was um an american scientist who was allowed to do field work in china 1979 to 1980 he says he witnessed women being forcibly aborted and sterilized under the new one child policy his groundbreaking reports on these barbaric practices led to his being fired from Stanford University. Isn't that interesting? You know, we began the program with Phil Donahue being fired for opposing the war.

Here's the guy who's fired for exposing the war on children, the war on humanity, the depopulation war, the globalist war on humanity that is now everywhere in all of our countries folks that was what 2020 was all about and that's what climate change has been about even before it rolled out paul ehrlich you know one of the founders of this earth day garbage he'd written the population bomb and that's what he was fundamentally about all of them whether you're talking about the bushes uh and um you know prescott bush working with margaret singer they always justified the abortions they justified everything that they do they justify it on the fact that we got too many people too many people for them to control this guy by the way steven mosher said when he posed this stuff he was before he went to china and saw this he was a pro-choice atheist

but no longer so trump responds to lala harris and economic plan. He says she can't answer how she'd pay for it. Well, wait a minute. Did he ever answer about how he's going to pay for his three and a half trillion dollar CARES Act and PPP and all the rest of the stuff during the lockdown? No, no. He ramped up the spending and Biden kept it. And, yeah, fiscal responsibility. It's always a refuge of a political scoundrel, isn't it? All these people, as soon as you start talking about a tax cut,

oh, we can't afford that. And, of course, she doesn't have any way that she's going to pay for her economic plan. Of course she doesn't. But did Trump have any way to pay for what he was doing? Did he even care to try? No, of course he didn't.

Uh, but Breitbart's not going to tell you that. I'm going to tell you that Trump didn't bother to pay a better way to approach this better than what Trump did is what the Washington post did. They called her economic plan, a gimmick. Trump says, well,

she doesn't have any way to pay for it. As if he's got a way to pay for his stuff. Um, but the Washington post just calls it a gimmick. It is a gimmick trump says well she doesn't have any way to pay for it as if he's got a way to pay for his stuff um but the washington post just calls it a gimmick it is a gimmick it is a gimmick which will be forgotten by whoever wins the presidency whichever group wins the presidency because again these people are puppets out front but a better critique from the washington post and from uh donald trump uh that's how bad this election is going uh washington post characterized it as populist gimmicks and they said it was to blame corporate price gouging rather than addressing the underlying economic challenges you know the underlying economic challenges like quantitative easing uh printing of money spending 35 trillion reasons that you could talk about but they choose

not to talk about any of those while the washington post is calling out harris over populist gimmicks the new york times marine dowd slammed democrats for executing a coup to remove biden from the ticket the party's power players have orchestrated a behind-the-scenes coup to push President Biden out of the 2024 race. Wow, even the New York Times is finally saying that. Marine Dow just figured this out? Here's the real 40 chess, folks. The power players who are the real president.

All right. So this collective group of so-called power players and all they're doing is just changing the spokesperson that's out front for the real people who are really running the power. The bureaucrats, the intelligence community, the other people there and some of these political operatives but uh they did a masterful job of orchestrating this i mean they came up with all this political uh ridiculous charges against trump so that he didn't have to engage in any primaries or any debates he was just anointed they chose trump their opponent. And then they chose to move the debate up way before the convention, which has never been done before. So they could get rid of Biden. They picked Trump and they picked Lala to run against Trump. people are out there who dressing up in communist colors the red state people the red cap maga people are absolutely clueless as to what's going on it truly you just kind of laugh at how stupid

this all is on rumble uh mad mim thank you very much for the tip and writes god bless you and family my normal question is when will you be interviewing Dr. Shiva again? Well, in about 35 minutes, he will be our guest. We have him scheduled for today, as a matter of fact. And so, it was one up on you. I didn't announce it at the top of the show, but he will be joining us at the top of the hour, Dr. Shiva will. So, the root cause of inflation. what are we going to do about this

right well we talked about it the other day the root cause is money creation always is um so uh meharry michael meharry talking about it cited the july budget deficit data showing the biden administration whoever they are we don't know who they are i mean it's not joe biden doing anything spent another 574 billion dollars in just one month running a 243 billion dollar deficit in other words 42 percent of the money that they spent they didn't have any way it was borrowed right they just put on the credit card that's what i say it's so ridiculous for trump after what he did and after what they all do say well you didn't got any way to pay for it that's the best you can do is absolutely clueless well here's her

personal solution of what do we do about the economy people struggling with inflation do we do about the economy? People struggling with inflation. Do we have price controls on groceries? Well, Babylon Bee said, Lala Harris suggests that Americans struggling to make ends meet just try sleeping with their boss because it works so well for her. So if we examine the passage of time in making ends meet, we can see that the easiest solution is just to try sleeping around with your boss as she cackled it works every time and there's great significance to the passage of every time sleeping with your boss is very simple you just sleep with them in order to make ends meet that way your ends will meet there is great significance to making ends meet. But the reality is, is that she really did sleep her way to the top.

Her sugar daddy that put her in place there, Willie Brown. Isn't that interesting that, you know, for all of the, all the baseless smears that Trump will throw at people that he doesn't like, that he won't go there with this. I guess he figures complaining about somebody sleeping around indiscriminately is kind of like throwing stones in a glass Trump Tower or something. You know, he's not going to do that. But again, Willie Brown brown king maker in california uh he was um

uh he gave her a bmw when she was already in a hundred thousand dollar a year job that he had arranged for her as well as getting her connected into a massive network of rich and powerful people. This is all in Peter Schweitzer's book, Profiles in Corruption, Abuse, and Power by America's Progressive Elite. Her entree into the corridors of political power largely began with a date. In 1994, she met Willie Brown, who at the time was the second most powerful man in California politics. He was Speaker of the State Assembly and very well connected in Sacramento. When he became mayor, well, that's when they met and he elevated her. You talk about the people who become super wealthy. He retired from political office in 2004, a 1.8 million dollar condo

in saint regis in san francisco two years later uh he um was renowned for his penchant for expensive brianni suits borsellino hats ferraris and porsches i don't even know what the suits and the hats are all about i do know know the cars. He once declared that his body would reject a Plymouth. Well, we should try it and see. That'd be something to see. Maybe we'd have a be like running one of the old

Hertz ads where they put you in the driver's seat. Running it in reverse. We'll take a quick break we'll be right back Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. I mentioned earlier in the program a pro-life activist who's been arrested multiple times for silently praying near an abortion clinic. He's now been awarded 13,000 pounds. I don't know. I'm guessing 15,000, 16,000 dollars from the police that the police have to pay. But isn't it interesting what we see happening here

with these globalist elites and their religion their religion of worshiping depravity and debauchery lgbt they want to murder babies they want to mutilate minors it's all about their religion, and they treat it like a religion. You are in our sacred space. We have a right of abortion, R-I-T-E, and you're there praying. Are they afraid of the prayers? I don't know. Prayers are effective, quite frankly, but perhaps they just see this as a way for them to exercise power in the same way the Biden administration is arresting peaceful protesters and sending them to jail for lengthy terms. What amounts to a life sentence for some sacrifice and liberal rights, RITES. Her last name is Vaughn Spruce.

She was supported by the Christian Defense Organization Alliance Defending Freedom UK. There's an alliance defending freedom in the United States as well. She was acquitted of all charges in February, 2023. She was arrested again weeks later for the same offense. Footage of the arrest went viral. I've played that in the past as the officers heard saying, you said that you're engaging in prayer. That's the offense.

So I'm not doing anything, standing here silently. However, charges were dropped again following an intervention from the then Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, who wrote to the police force to say that silent prayer is, quote, not unlawful, unquote. Commenting on her 13,000-pound payout, she said, silent prayer is not a crime. Nobody should be arrested merely for the thoughts they have in their heads.

Yet this is what happened to me twice at the hands of the West Midlands police who explicitly told me that, quote, prayer is an offense. Unquote. There is no place for Orwell's thought police in 21st century Britain. And thanks to legal support I receive from the ADF of UK, I'm delighted that the settlement I've received today acknowledges that. While the payout represents a victory for the cause of religious liberty and freedom of speech in Britain, it comes as the new left-wing Labour Party government is reportedly considering measures to formally criminalize silent prayer

outside abortion clinics on a national level that's exactly right they are again uh well it's not a crime to silently pray well their response the new labor government's response is well let's make it a crime to pray silently uh the MPs voted for legislation last year that would ban silent prayer within buffer zones of 150 meters around the location of a clinic or hospital providing abortion services that's pretty amazing to think about that's one and a half football fields a radius of one and a half football fields uh you can't pray or say anything about abortion. Can't even do it silently, right? This is about arbitrary government power. So they said when pushing back against it,

the guidance from parliament had said, quote, silent prayer, being the engagement of the mind and thought and prayer toward god is protected as an absolute right under the human rights act of 1998 and should not on its own be considered to be an offense under any circumstances you see how the uk left themselves open for attack because you see if you say that your rights come from something some document somewhere like the human rights human rights Act of 1998.

If that's what gives you your rights, then the government can take it away. They're not rights then. They are government-granted privileges, of course. And so the American position, as defined in the Declaration of Independence, and whether or not it is defined in the Declaration of Independence, the truth is and the American perspective is and what the hill for us to die on is to say that our rights come from God. We are endowed by our creator with inalienable rights

and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That's not the extended, that's not the complete list, but it certainly does include the right to life. And that comes from government. It does come it comes from god it does not come from government and the minute that we say that we get our rights from the bill of rights or from some human rights act of 1998 we've lost home office is considering banning silent prayer outside abortion clinics. Free speech is under threat in labor Britain. And so too, it seems, is free non-speech. Why do you think that they included political and religious freedoms in the First Amendment together?

Because they always go together. You can't have one without the other. We specifically voted against proposals to allow silent prayer and consensual communication, safe access zones said the new policing minister. I noticed that the home office has produced guidance, which includes those measures being allowed. I just wondered why you would do that when parliament has been very clear that

that was not the will of parliament in other words we've already spoken clearly on this that we don't want this punished and yet you ignore that and you're going to do it anyway well that's where we are isn't it nobody is paying any attention even pretending to pay any attention to the superior laws just as biden and trump didn't care to pay any attention to the constitution we haven't had anybody in office for the longest time that's in congress or the presidency anybody in the federal government none of them care about it why because the federal government is a foreign occupied government. It embraces all of the globalist agenda. Because the globalist agenda comes from them.

They're the ones who are formulating this stuff. We're the major influence in terms of funding and everything else. For the UN and for NATO and for all of these organizations. So as I said earlier, the Church of England is going to drop the word church from the names of its congregations. As this article in Dissenter says, they're coming clean finally. Yeah. So what are you going to call it? We're of England, of England.

Is it going to be the club? Is it going to be the community? What is it going to be it? We're of England. Of England. Is it going to be the club? Is it going to be the community? What is it going to be? We don't know. Hasn't been a church for a long, long time, if ever. Church of England established by Henry VIII's ego-driven break from Rome so that he could divorce his wife. This institution has now traded the gospel for the latest social fad.

And it's like, I love the way the center put this, it's like an aging actor who is desperately chasing after the next big role, oblivious to how ridiculous they've become. They've dropped the word church from their new congregations because apparently even acknowledging their identity is too much of a burden. It's like a chef refusing to call their restaurant a restaurant in hopes that people will finally appreciate their microwaved meals. I guess that's the way you're going to get fed at the C of E. The church, quote unquote, in its pursuit of relevance has become irrelevant. Just another hollow institution echoing the world's empty slogans. The Church of England is not evolving.

It's dissolving. Ah, that's it right there. It's not evolving. It's dissolving. Apparently, even using the word church is too burdensome for an organization that has eagerly embraced every passing cultural fad like a chameleon changing colors to blend in with its surroundings. And of course, they are so focused on being relevant to the culture, matching the culture and everything. Do you even know what the word church came from? Ekklesia means the called out.

You're called out of that stuff. You're not to be trying to join with that you know we see that in the big mega churches here that are setting up movie themes and their lobbies and everything and it's like a party stuff church of england increasingly avoiding the word church in favor of more quote relevant and modern sounding unquote descriptors that's the way they refer to it. Things like community. When they name new worship groups. A worship group? I guess the question I have is, what are they worshiping?

Are they worshiping Hollywood? Are they worshiping LGBT? Are they worshiping themselves? What are they worshiping? Who are they worshiping, right? Who needs Jesus when you got social justice homosexuality abortion rights to preach this guy says so kudos to the church of england for finally admitting what we have all known for years no longer a church in any meaningful way no longer called out we'll have

to call them out about that i guess and of And, of course, America is becoming less religious, but no group more, no one more so than this group. And what group is that? As I said at the top of the program, it's women. And this mainstream media article from AOL starts out as a Nicaraguan-born girl growing up in Miami, Prisca Dorcas Mejoica Rodriguez, remembers going to church five times a week. Her father was a pastor. Their fundamentalist evangelical faith taught that a woman's role was to serve her husband. Well, she didn't like that. Ultimately dismayed by the subservient role of women and the church's harsh restrictions on girls, she would leave her faith and her husband in her late 20s after she got a master's degree in divinity.

In divinity. Here, you are now a god. That's what she thinks, I guess, with her divinity degree. It's like the wizard of oz uh women are less inclined to be involved with churches that don't want us speaking up we're like the mules of church that's what it feels like that's what i said at the beginning of the program when i was talking about ayn rand this whole idea that i'm not going to serve other people. I'm not going to get involved in altruism. Who is greater?

Who is going to be the greater one of us? Said the apostles to Christ. And he says, well, you will serve the greatest of you will serve the lesser. That's the model. That's the kicking back against these fundamental attitudes that Christ has given us. The way that we are to regard each other, the way we are to regard our spouse, our family, society, the other members of the church. They've pushed back against all of these things. I will be Lord.

Right? The pride of Satan. And so, you know, when we look at this, yeah, she said, you know, this is a curse. It feels like a curse. It feels like a curse because it is a curse. We're all subordinate in one way or the other, aren't we? I mean, you know, when you look at, again, do you believe the Bible? If you don't believe the Bible, why are you bothering to go to church? Where did you get these ideas from? Why do you take some of it you pick and choose and you edit it out you know people criticize thomas jefferson and rightfully so for you know cutting

out the things that he didn't like on the bible these people do it they just don't do it literally well you know as part of the fall the man was cursed you know there's no intermediate area god is either blessing us or he's cursing us and so if your work feels like drudgery if it feels like futility and frustration yeah join the club that's part of the curse that's the curse the curse of that and then of course uh the woman who was first to rebel against god and cosmic rebellion got a double curse uh subordination was part of it but then also uh health issues and things like that and everybody's cursed with death right so all those things are there the question is how do we get god's blessing

but nobody really wants that they want to do it on their own right they want to do whatever serves them whatever serves their life that's why i said you know ayn rand should be proud her philosophy has been completely enacted along with a sexual debauchery to make the worship of self even stronger 63 of americans are Christian, according to the Pew Research Center. That's down from 90% in the early 90s. So in 30 years, it's dropped 30 points. It's in free fall. And you know what else is in free fall? Morals, free speech, everything in our society is in free fall. you're either blessed or you're cursed there's no intermediate stage there young women are moving further left politically yeah we so we

notice uh interesting to me that uh talking about how clueless trump is um somebody did an ai thing of a bunch of young women swifties with uh you know swifties for trump shirt it was an ai thing and trump fell for it he thought it was real he reposted that now he's really got them motivated they're really angry at him but we've got even gop congressman from New York has cut a 30-second ad to say that he supports abortion up to birth. Mark Molinaro for Congress, a Republican, a New York Republican congressman, trying to run for re-election. and so he has to bow the knee to the new religion most of the republicans would just try to ignore it and hope that it goes away but they won't fight for babies they won't even kiss babies anymore i believe health decisions should be made between a man between a woman and her doctor not washington i was the first republican to back federal protection for

ivf and to support federal access to birth control he said okay uh were you there when health decisions people wouldn't make their health decisions in 2020 about vaccines and about masks and about social distancing and about whether or not they live their life oh that's right you weren't so shut up you're not about freedom you're not about health freedom about any of that stuff you just want to kill babies be honest about it you and the rest of these republicans at least this guy comes out and says yeah i want to kill babies the rest of them are just silent they're silent when it was done to us in 2020 they're silent when it's done to babies all the time. Silence.

Well, they're not going to be the silent majority for long, are they? 30-second spot is no frills, said Politico. Said it features a GOP first-term lawmaker looking into the camera to voice what he has expressed in written response to the Democrats' recent attacks on him as anti-abortion

so that's one way to handle it instead of just running away and when you look at austin austin texas i'm so glad i never i don't live there anymore never liked it and we didn't live in austin had to go in every day um austin is going to take a half a million dollars in taxpayer money to pay for abortion travel five hundred thousand dollars for quote reproductive health logistical support in other words abortion travel expenses the fund will not only help women travel, but also pay for a companion to accompany them. As Texas Right for Life reports, it is unclear exactly how the city plans to allocate the funds as, quote, it is a crime in Texas to donate money to organizations that procure out-of-state abortions. Any individual or government entity that gives to these groups becomes complicit in their criminal

acts unquote well this is marxist austin and they are begging the republicans to do something about it will they see if they go in and they do criminal prosecution they're hoping that they can become martyrs that's a very powerful thing to become martyrs for that and they will look like they can make themselves look like martyrs because the republicans refuse to show what an abortion is they refuse to show what life is they refuse to value life to value family i just showed yesterday a clip of a father in Brazil at 32 weeks of age, ultrasound, a 4D ultrasound, where you can see movement of the baby. And the baby recognized his voice already.

And he starts talking baby talk to the baby as they're doing the ultrasound. The baby starts smiling. Just show that kind of stuff if you don't have the stomach to show the reality of abortion at least show the reality of life and elevate that but they won't do that austin is also marxist austin is also a sanctuary city for child mutilation uh and then finally this um computer tablet use uh is linked to angry outbursts amongst toddlers now they don't say it in this article here uh this is from cvs news but steve jobs would not allow his kids to get on computers until they were in their teens

or later. I think, you know, late teens. I think it was, I forget the exact age, but the guy who created the iPhone, the guy created the iPad and all the rest of the stuffy. No, I'm not going to let my kids on that. He knows, he knows while allowing little kids to stare at a computer screen often gives parents a much-needed respite, new research suggests cutting back on the practice with early tablet use linked to increased outbursts later on. It's not good for the kids when that becomes their main instruction device at school either. You know, this drill and practice stuff. That's not a positive influence for them. Children who log 75 minutes or more a day screen time at three and a half years old were more apt to outbursts of anger and frustration a year later.

Further, the findings suggest a vicious cycle at play with little kids who were more apt toward expressions of anger and frustration at four and a half years old likely to spend even more time on an ipad a year later so they said repeated use so you can use it to pacify them if they throw a temper tantrum but repeated use of this kind of strategy does not allow children to develop strong internal emotional regulation skills. I said, duh, I've told this story before. Travis is doing the board here.

Um, when he was very young, he's younger than three and a half and we were eating at a restaurant and he started throwing a temper tantrum and I could not discipline him in the restaurant. Probably get CPS on me. So I just picked him up and took him out to the car and discipline him in the restaurant probably get cps on me so I just picked him up and took him out to the car and put him in the car seat and strapped him in and let

him just flail away I shut the door and I stepped back so he couldn't see me he thought he was stuck in the car until he was all cried out I just sat there watching him he couldn't see me. And, um, then, uh, I took him out. I said, uh, you're going to be good now. We never had that problem again. I didn't give him a computer tablet. I wouldn't have done that. Even if we had had one, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 ¶¶ © BF-WATCH TV 2021 The David H. you're listening to the david knight show well we've all seen the pictures of cuban cars as a matter of fact travis pull this up um this

is under tech uh we've all seen the pictures of the cuban cars you know it's kind of frozen in time in the 1950s when the communists took over uh no new cars coming in there's a picture of them all these all these old cars in the 1950s and um now what is happening is they're making it impossible for them to drive these cars think about that these are cars that they have been able to keep running for 60 years. They treat them with great care. They keep fixing them and so forth. But how are they stopping it? And how are they getting them to move away from these classic cars?

We should let Eric Peters know about this. Maybe he could arrange some deals with them to get some of these things. It could make a lot of money in the United States, especially around this area. People love classic cars. And they've been really well maintained. The problem is they're just starving them for fuel. They said that the Communist Party there is keeping gasoline and diesel fuel

very difficult to obtain. And that's the same uh approach that is being run by our communists here in america as well and so what they're trying to do is move them away from these cars the same cars that they've been able to maintain for 60 years and move them away from that to electric scooters. And China has a hand in this because, again, all manufacturing is going to be coming from China because we are giving them the advantage in terms of cheap energy. After 65 years of communist rule repressing natural economic activity, blocking access to the U.S. market, replacing the nation's educated class of poorly prepared regime elites.

Cuba's power grid is potentially more unreliable than its old cars. That's right. They're deliberately destroying it. The communist in Cuba are destroying their power grid, just like the communists in America. And that makes even the electric scooters a gamble. Just like it makes it a gamble for you to spend the extra money to get an electric car. Are you going to be able to charge it?

No. California has already restricted that type of thing, and you're going to wind up paying a lot of money for a battery electric vehicle that they will demand you use to back up their grid oh yeah let's let's put the juice in and then we'll suck it back out but you can't drive it and of course every time you cycle the charges they've only got a certain number of cycles that they're good for it it destroys the life of the battery to some degree so the chinese press has depicted the rise of electric vehicles as a viable solution to the fuel shortages and the communist economic crises that the cubans are experiencing tens of

thousands of evs though relying on the power grid to function will likely impose significant strain on their already fragile power grid. And it's convenient that the electric motorbike factory that is there in Cuba is owned by a Chinese company. Now, what have they done to make it impossible to use these cars that they've been using for 60 years, even under previous communism. Now you've got communism mixed with the global green agenda, and that's proven fatal. Even worse than 60 years of communism is the kind of green agenda that is being imposed upon all of us, communist or not. As of July, Reuters reported that refueling a car in cuba

could take hours or days on some occasions so they've made fueling a car which should only take a minute at the most right they're talking about 10 gallons i've timed it how long does it take me to pump 10 gallons into my car it It takes me about 45 seconds on most pumps. The rest of the stuff in terms of the financial transaction and opening up your gas cap and all the rest of the stuff, that's the kind of thing you'd have to do with an electric vehicle as well. You still got to go through the transaction stuff. You still got to open up the port and get the thing and plug it in. But the actual transference of energy, if you will, if you're using fuel for a 10-gallon tank, should take you about 40 to 45 seconds.

But it takes hours or days now in Cuba. And there was a five-fold price hike earlier this year this is what they're going to do what they're doing in cuba is what the communists and the the greens again the whole green agenda they're watermelon marxist thin veneer green all communism but this is what they're going to do worldwide so they're going to jack up the price of fuel and make it unavailable a five-fold price increase earlier this year so a 10 gallon tank of gas cost more than the average state workers monthly wage think about that just one tank of gas 10 gallons is going to cost more than the average state worker's wage. This has led to the adoption of EVs.

They're forcing them into this with no apparent plan for dramatically expanding the electricity supply either because they don't want you moving. And this is where we're getting this everywhere. I mean, this is Cuba, but this is happening everywhere. Here's Cuba. They're good buddies with Venezuela. Venezuela's got more oil than Saudi Arabia. But guess what?

The Venezuelans are communists and they can't figure out how to do anything. They can't get the oil out. They can't refine it. So, you know, nothing there for Cuba. But they don't want anybody moving. That's the whole point of what's happening now. And you think that Trump is going to help with this stuff? Trump is a thousand percent clueless about just the comment that he made about artificial intelligence.

He knows that he's been told that he's got to suck up the AI and the companies that are pushing this stuff out there. He's got to suck up to big tech. He's got to suck up to the technocratic overlords. So he's got to suck up to big tech. He's got to suck up to the technocratic overlords. So he's got to suck up to the people who are doing AI. He's got to suck up to the, um, to the, um, uh, cyber currencies and stuff. Right. Uh, cryptocurrency. So yeah, I'm all for that stuff. I love it.

And yet, uh, he made the comment. He says, well, yeah, we need to have more workers from abroad. We need to open up for more immigration because AI is going to need workers. He's looking at this and he, okay, so artificial intelligence, that's the up and coming thing, and it's really exploding in growth. We're all going to need more workers.

He doesn't have a clue what AI is about. How is he going to defend against what the globalists are doing? Even if he were in, even if he wanted to, he's absolutely clueless. He doesn't know anything about 2030. He doesn't know about the fourth turning. He doesn't know about the entire AI agenda,

which is to take your jobs and then to pacify you by giving you your universal basic income. He doesn't know anything about that. He just sees, Oh, well, everybody's talking about this new thing called AI. Well, the companies that are making the AI are going to need more workers to make the AI.

No, they're not. You have Cisco posted $10.3 billion in profits last year. That's in profits, not sales. Profits. But they're still laying off 5,500 workers. Why? Because they want to invest more in AI. And because AI is not about hiring people. It's not about workers at all.

Is Trump the last person on earth to not figure this out? And so when you look at Google, or as I should say, Giggle, the search engine that is a joke, the former CEO, Eric Schmidt, did a conference and he had a couple of things that he had to say that are really have created a buzz. He blamed working from home for the problems that Giggle is having with AI, being behind their competitors. Ex-Giggle CEO Eric Schmidt is walking back his questionable claims that remote work is to blame

for Giggle slipping behind open AI. And of course, what is working from home really doing? Gerald Slenty has talked about this for the longest time. The commercial real estate bust. Productivity bust. It's going to bring down the banks and all the rest of this stuff.

Gerald got it right, but Eric Schmidt, looking at this and thinking that the uh that it's to blame for their lack of productivity look if you look at the way that giggle treats their workers i gotta say that working in that environment is probably a lot more distracting than working from home the way they pamper them and the things that they do but he was giving a speech at stanford university uh and um uh the speech got put on youtube and um during the talk asked why giggle was falling behind other ai firms he said it's because we decided to let our staffers enjoy remote work and with it a bit of work-life balance giggle decided that work-life balance is going home

early and working from home and that was more important than winning he said and the reason startups work is because people work like hell he said again um that's not been what um giggle was about for the longest time they've been about pampering everybody but he had something else to say the stanford speech that uh got people also upset as part of this he said well it's fine if ai companies steal all the content he says if it takes off then you just hire a bunch of lawyers to go clean up the mess right this is the ethics quote-unquote ethics of silicon valley sure steal all the stuff and you know it used to be that their motto was move fast and break things now i guess with ai is move fast and steal things and when we make a lot of money we'll hire a bunch

of lawyers and they'll get us off the hook they'll make it all right are you worried that your ai startup might be illegally swallowing up boatloads of copyright protected content well according to the former giggle ceo eric schmidt you can worry about that later once you have oodles of cash and a platoon of lawyers so the verge reported that during a recent talk at Stanford's School of Engineering, Schmidt displayed what can only be described as the Silicon Valley CEO's final boss energy as he laid out a theoretical scenario in which the students in the room might use a large language model to build a TikTok competitor in the case that the platform was to be banned. He says, here's what I propose.

Each and every one of you do. Say to your large language model the following. Make me a copy of TikTok. Steal all the users. Steal all the music. Put my preferences in it. Produce this program in the next 30 seconds. Release it.

And in one hour, if it's not viral do something different along the same lines he told everybody he said that's the command that i would give and he says what you would do if you're a silicon valley entrepreneur he said is if it took off then you'd hire a whole bunch of lawyers to go clean up the mess right and then he added that if nobody uses your product it doesn't matter that you stole all the content anyway and he says don't quote me except they did quote him uh it's absolutely this is uh this is the ethics of silicon valley and uh, do we have a, uh, Dr. Shiva? What's that?

Almost. Okay. We're still trying to make a connection. Uh, he did at one point try to point out that he was not arguing that you should illegally steal everybody's music, but, um, he had just told everybody to do that. He kind of had this, um, they say final uh boss moment right now i think what what happened was he just started speaking candidly and i think we got a glimpse uh out of the heart out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks and out of the abundance of the heart of this guy who by the way is he may be the former CEO of Giggle, but he is currently kind of the CEO of the military industrial complex.

He had tremendous amount of influence and impact in the Obama administration. And that has only grown with artificial intelligence that he's bringing in to the Pentagon and to the military industrial complex. He is one of the chief people that this kind of person, this kind of ethics, this is the kind of person that is creating autonomous killer robots. You see, we talk about ethics because it really matters. It really matters. What you think is and what you believe in your heart is going to affect your life and the life of other people.

And this is why we have a society that is the way that it is. We are reaping what we have sown and in addition to that i think god is directly cursing us with people like eric schmidt and trump and lala and biden he apparently sees the alleged intellectual property theft as just a mess for lawyers to clean up later schmidt told the stanford students he said silicon valley will run these tests and then they will clean up the mess he said typically that's the way things are done um yeah you you move fast and you steal things that really describes it better than moving fast and breaking things and so uh that's one of the guys behind the big ai revolution but then of course the one who has

been up front has been sam altman and his open ai and he is also running the world coin scam you know he not only wants to run artificial intelligence and he's gone he's given multiple presentations to Congress talking about how only people like him, and presumably whoever's running Giggle, just like Eric Schmidt, only people who are like those guys should be entrusted with AI. The government should step in and stop other people from competing with them uh that's why i say you know that i don't think anything is going to happen with this antitrust stuff against giggle because these people are too firmly entrenched and as he was saying this and scaring everybody about how ai could be weaponized they're all saying oh yeah yeah we need to let responsible people like sam altman somebody who is going around the world and scanning people's eyes to create a global biometric database and then giving them a little bit of cryptocurrency uh to further trouble and a worthless cryptocurrency that he has created and so now uh the wall street

journal reports jurisdictions around the world are starting to look uh with a critical eye at his eye scan uh the uh they said the nominally altruistic project there's nothing altruistic about this at all he's got designs of things that he wants to do um einman would be proud of him he's going to control everybody and so multiple countries are pushing back against this you you get 25 of his cryptocurrency coins in exchange oh great great and so there's a lot of companies but the countries that are talking about stopping this thus far only kenya which is one of the first countries where the project was piloted only kenya has closed its probe after a year-long suspension uh but several others are talking about hopefully they will stop it.

But these are the people who seek to run the world. And so we're going to take a quick break. We now have Dr. Shiva on and we're going to catch up with him and find out what is on his radar and how the campaign is going. We'll be right back with Dr. Shiva, who is running a grassroots campaign for president. We'll be right back. S.A. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 ORGAN PLAYS ¶¶ Defending the American Dream. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. And joining us now is Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, who has run for, I think it was Senate in Massachusetts. He's been very politically active, but he's also

trying to help people to get control of their lives. You can find, he's got several different websites, Shiva4President.com. Shiva4President.com is one place where you can find him. So joining us now is Dr. Shiva. I want to get him on to have some counter-programming to the Republican and Democrat stuff that we're getting inundated with. So thanks for joining us, Dr. Shiva. Yeah. The other website is truth, freedom, health.com, David, where they can really find. So one of our slogans that we put out there, David is shattered the swarm.

And people go to the website, shattered the swarm.com. But preeminently what we are leading with this, people need to learn how to save themselves save yourself yeah um there's no one coming to save us uh and i don't mean that against any religious or spiritual modes but i mean that in a very very uh responsible way well you know we just had we just had uh joe rogan and uh was it dennis quaid or randy quaid i can't remember i get them mixed up who had just got a movie about reagan and they were saying so who's running the country and it's like why do you want anybody to run the country first place

secondly we can see that nobody visible is running the kind of people running the country are not the people that you're voting for so what can we do to make our lives better yeah the swarm is running the country it's a decentralized group of people who have built to maximize power profit control but what i wanted to share with you david is you know we um have a you know massive movement a global movement truth freedom help in the united states that movement is manifesting itself to again mobilize people bottoms up to build a serious uh movement that educates people that it is only us, we the people that can have ever changed anything significantly. It's never has

come from top down. If anything has come from top down, it's hijacking a bottoms up movements to divert them. That's right. But one of the important things is that, you know, in the United States, when you run for election, particularly in the general election on November 5th, which is coming up 2024, people forget that we're a Republic where you have states and the states elect their representatives to this organization called the United States government. They elect House of Representatives, they elect senators,

but they also elect electors. This is very hard for people to understand the 12th Amendment. They do not elect me for president. They do not elect Trump. They do not elect Kamala Harris on November 5th. Right. And the way this has manifested itself in a very real way, and I would probably say only about 100 people really understand this from a legal and even judges. And let me explain what I'm talking about. So we have been getting on the ballots in many states close to 15 states and other states will be we still are getting on the ballot as a right it you have to still so when you get on the ballot in a state everyone should listen to this carefully it's not i am getting on the ballot for november 5th it is a set of electors so for example in the state

of new jersey people come together and some people say oh we like this guy trump other people say we like this woman kamala other people say we like dr shiva those people um can be electors of me and and so in new jersey you need 14 electors and the 14 electors that number reflects a number of house of representatives plus two senators typically okay so those electors those slate of electors a slate of electors for trump a slate of electors for kamala the slate of electors for dr shiva are the ones who are running for office on November 5th. They're not, I'm not the one who's running. Why? Because we're a republic. I'm a resident of Massachusetts. I can't run for office of electors, which is the office of electors in New Jersey. I would say most people don't even know this, David. take 99.9 of people so in new jersey we have thousands of

volunteers out of them arose 14 electors those electors and have to go get papers from the secretary of state to nominate so people are nominating them those slates okay so our slate of electors who um want me who say that if they are elected electors on december 17th which is the um first monday after the second wednesday that's when those electors if they win will vote for me it's a little bit complicated but this is how the actual general election works in a presidential election so new jersey um our slate of electors fulfilled all their rules to get themselves on the ballot which means they got the signatures they got thousands of signatures everything um so we get on the ballot then we get a challenge a lawsuit by kamala harris against me running for office not me but to be specific the electors that want me to be president

okay and the challenge was not directed to me i am not the party it was i mean it was directed to me it wasn't directed to our electors and the challenge said oh dr shiva writing a letter to me a lawsuit against me saying you can't be president because you're not natural born okay so let's unpack that a they have no jurisdiction over me, the qualifications for president are not decided until December 17th and thereafter by Congress. Only Congress can decide. C, a slate of electors can pledge their votes to anyone. Mickey Mouse, Fidel Castro, someone who's 10 years old, someone who's 100 years old. who's 100 years old they can pledge their vote to anyone so again everyone needs to understand this very simple concept but it's not because people don't teach history anymore those plate of electors when they put the name when you go to vote it says Dr Shiva that's a brand that means they're saying we're gonna we're under this brand called Dr Sheba or Trump or Harris.

Now, prior to the 1900s, when you went to vote, let's say there's three people running for office and there's 14 electors. You could have 42 names on a ballot. My math is right. Three times 14. And it became onerous for the states to do this. So they said, oh, we're going to collapse these electors under a label. Trump, Kamala Harris, Dr. Shiva. Okay?

So it's very important to understand people are not voting for me or Trump or Harris on November 5th. They're voting for the slate of electors. Yeah, I think you're saying, because since you're running as an independent, I've been involved in this in third party politics with the Libertarian Party back in the late 80s and early 90s. And so in that, what we were doing was we were getting a party on the ballot. And they would have as part of your petitions that you'd sign, you'd have to have the wording that we, the undersigned, want to form a political party. It's not just that I would like to see a choice on the ballot.

No, you're forming a political party or whatever and so what they would do is they would allocate to the the parties who were free to choose their uh their candidates any way they chose they could have a state financed primary or they could just meet in convention and choose their candidates and then also in meeting in convention they would choose their delegates so that if that party and you know for president they would have a nominee that they put there that would be that whole slate of delegates whose names were submitted to the board of elections so with you and is it just in new jersey is that the wording there or is it something that you're voting for the office of electors every state

this is the 12th amendment but you're not voting for the president you're not voting for the name donald trump you're voting for that slate of electors this is why they could swap out biden for harris because those slate of electors were pledged to biden which is a name. It's a brand. And you can just flip it to Harris tomorrow. So in every state, you're not voting on November 5th for the president. You're voting for a slate of electors. In fact, if you read every state election code, it says in there, please be mindful, even though the name of your candidate is showing up there, you're not voting for them.

You're voting for the electors. Anyway, so Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party sue me. Now, they have never sued anyone in New Jersey before. In 1972, Linda Jenis ran under the Socialist Workers Party. Okay? Meaning she didn't run her slate of electors ran. She was only 31 years old. Roger Calero ran in 2004 and 2008.

He was not a naturalized citizen he wasn't natural born he was a nicaraguan citizen but he was the a different party's candidate okay those set of electors no one challenged him in fact he got on the ballot he got about a couple hundred votes but that's the way it runs this is why in colorado when colorado tried to take trump off the ballot the supreme court swooped in and said no you don't have any right to qualify because they said he's unqualified to run for president because he committed insurrection insurrection you know committing insurrection is one of the qualifications or not committing insurrection everyone needs to understand that the qualifications for becoming president are decided

by they're decided by the uh david can you take one one second sure sure that's one yeah yeah it's it's uh it's very interesting because this this is the party that is always talking about it's the end of democracy this is the the party that has shut down all of the primaries this is a party by the way that wanted to shut down the primaries in florida the dnc shut it down uh they had at the time i don't know if cornell west was still there but you know cornell west was running essentially as a democrat rfk jr running as a democrat uh he had this other guy was his name philip dean or something he was uh but you know they had three or four people who wanted to run against biden and they said no we're just going to shut down the prime sorry about that david sure i have um so anyway the

key thing i want to let everyone know is and i by the way most lawyers don't know this most judges don't know this yeah they don't well there's a height of i was just telling the audience where you're gone i said it's the height of hypocrisy these people are saying well it's going to be the end of democracy you know you got to vote for the democrats because we're all about democracy you can vote yeah you're voting for a slate of electors right the reality is anyone can run for office a five-year-old can run fidel castro vladimir putin can run for office in the united states if he gets a bunch of electors saying they're going to pledge what will happen is let's say that happens. Let's say a bunch of electors get together in New Jersey and they say, we want, by the way, any state, you know, our pledge candidate is Putin.

Let's say he gets all the electoral votes on December 17th. What would then happen, David, is we'd go to Congress. Congress would then say, no, no, no, he can't be on, he can't be our president because he's not born here. He wants to overthrow the United States, et cetera. The point is many people, anyone can run for office. Right. So why is Kamala Harris's campaign? They came after me.

It went to a, one of the lower court, lower courts by an administrative judge. The guy didn't even listen to any of the arguments. Then I had to appeal it to the appellate court they didn't want to hear it and now it got appealed to the New Jersey New York Supreme Court New Jersey Supreme Court and they didn't want to hear it really what's interesting is the main newspaper New Jersey said oh they didn't want to hear it dot dot dot because he's anti-israel and he's anti-vaccine mandates okay he justified it the bottom line is the following they sued the wrong person because the electors are the ones they should have gone after my electors bottom line is they

did everything perfectly so we have a major lawsuit that's brewing right now number one you can natural born equals naturalized citizen that's the 14th amendment which has been adjudicated with schneider versus rusk and bowling versus sharp so i told everyone we ran this would come up but the bottom line is we are a republic every state elects its electors those electors can pledge their vote to anyone it is congress who decides who's qualified or not so if i were to get elected or my all the electors to be specific get elected who pledge their vote to me on december 17th thereafter congress would have to have a meeting wait Wait a minute. He's a naturalized citizen. Is that qualified or not?

That would go into a massive debate. Yeah. That's when qualification occurs. So they are conflating running for president with becoming president. Yes. Running for president is different than becoming president. Anyone can run for president. Everyone should repeat that 100 times. anyone can run for president everyone should repeat that a

hundred times anyone can run for president and when you run for president and on election day you are not voting for the president of the united states when it comes to the presidential election you're voting for the office of electors right and if those based on those slates of office of electors getting selected then that candidate then they pledge that candidate and based on this is prior this is really like prior restraint is what this is right and and so you know when you when you look at this what does it tell us it tells us a the democrats are hypocrites uh b they don't want to have elections uh they're scared to death of people having a choice and of course they're also afraid of you because they didn't do this with other candidates so we're this exactly because i will probably take a half a million votes or something or a couple hundred thousand votes in

new jersey i'm very well known that's where email was created i'm well known all over new jersey so kamala harris is afraid that i will disturb that They didn't do this to Roger Calero, who ran for president, Nicaraguan citizen. Right. So this is the big news. And Wisconsin is doing the same thing. All right. Because they know I'm the candidate, David, that they must make invisible. It's only a few guys like you who walk the walk all these other influencers and podcasters who talk about against Zionism who talk about anti-establishment they're scared you can fill in the blanks to put me on their shows right that's right that's what's really going on I'm I'm the big elephant in the room people want to make invisible but the fact

that Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party and by the way it's interesting kamala harris is supposedly indian whatever she is the lawyer that they elected is an indian guy and the secretary of state is a black woman these people are violating the 14th amendment separate of that yeah the 14th amendment is what let kamala harris run obama run yeah and it allows me to run so they always get you know color on color crime this is what the elites did all over british did all over africa right you get the black people to oppress black people the british did this in india you get gandhi to screw over the brown people so this is quite fascinating to watch in jersey which is one of the highest populations of immigrants legal immigrants highest population naturalized citizens

that kamala who's by the way a tamil brahman is going after a non-bramman yeah it's so wild yeah so where is it now you said that you appealed so. Now I can appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court. So that's what we're strategizing. This is going to be in days. This is hot news that everyone should be covering. The New Jersey Globe was forced to cover it, but they rationalized it saying, oh, yeah, they don't need to hear his case. By the way, he's anti-vaccine mandates. He's against Israel. Mm hmm. Mm hmm. And as you know, I just justifies it that justifies keeping you out of politics right that's amazing that is breaking news and that's very important so i was not aware of that

it's very important so david i have i have a i have a slight thing i gotta i can come back if you want a couple minutes or we can read you know do a follow-up but i just have something that just popped up because we have to submit a couple of papers. Sure, I understand. Yeah, you're on a deadline here. So yeah, if you want to, you want to come back, you can do that and we'll keep it open for you to do that. If you want to get back on Travis, what's that?

The show ends in about a half hour. So I don't know if you've got the time. I may be able to go five minutes and come right back. Just give me five minutes. If you can keep going keep going sure i'll be right back in five minutes all right yep all right well i'll be right back trey keep it going okay all right uh so i guess just keep him on the line and he'll be back in five minutes i think that's very interesting uh again it is the hypocrisy and i've got uh a comment here on rumble uh question for dr shiva uh about the adelson's benefit, the money

for Trump and things like that. I'm sure he's going to want to talk about that as well. But it is, you know, like I said, when everybody was arguing about the 2020 election, I said the election corruption begins with ballot access. What do we see here? It begins with ballot access. If you can't even have a choice of who you want to vote for, if they shut people out of the debate, and that, of course, is what the newspaper is doing, justifying this. Well, you know, he's anti-vaccine, and he doesn't support Israel, so therefore he shouldn't be allowed on the ballot.

Really? Again, this is not just prior restraint, but this is about weaponizing political positions against people. So that's really what we're looking at here with this. So he's going to be back with us in about five minutes. I'm going to take a quick break

and we will be right back. Stay with us. ¶¶ © transcriptF-WATCH TV 2021 liberty it's your move and now the david knight show well while we're waiting for dr sh Shiva to come back, I thought it was interesting to seeering off of the inflation that's been created by successive administrations, of course, and especially by the Biden administration. Gold soared to a record high as the dollar was dumped when Kamala unveiled her, quote, populist, unquote, economic plan. Zero Hedge says, we're sure it's just a coincidence that the dollar plunged to five months lows on the day that she unveiled her plan. And we see gold going up and setting all new record highs, actually. Part of the response to all this, one analyst says crazy is three thousand dollar gold from here because it broke 2500 for the first time earlier this week and it is um it is hanging uh above 2500

for the last i looked at it uh it's going to you know it nothing goes as uh we always say uh up into the um right always uh but it is going to i think continue to trend higher there'll be um fluctuations in it uh at all these different times but again it is the thing that everybody falls back on when things look like they're going to go crazy going to come apart it is wealth insurance and again if you want to prepare for this type of stuff especially for a commie la la administration if that is the case or who knows what trump will do i mean he's also talking about a lot of crazy nonsense as well whatever these two people are going to do this next four years things are going to move very quickly and very strangely and very seriously because we're at the tail end of

this fourth turning so if you want to keep your wealth protected and have some leg outside of this system where they're going to try to control everything if you want to go to tony artaban wise wolf gold he's set up david knight dot gold that'll take you to tony's website you can buy gold and silver small or large transactions tony will work with you and he'll even help you to gradually accumulate at whatever level you're comfortable with he's got a lot of different tiers that you can make a monthly purchase of gold and silver he calls it wise wolf and you can get the group buying discounts as part of wise wolf every month you can set aside a little bit of money it's a great savings program because it's really about saving

your wealth it's not just about saving some money people don't typically save anymore but if you're going to save don't save it into dollars save it into something that's going to retain its value and that's what you can do with wise wolf so um it's interesting um that the democrats as part of their official platform have decided not to talk at all about bitcoin or crypto they said a lot of stuff about bitcoin and crypto on um as part of their official policy for the last four years a dead set against it and so this is a dividing line between the Republicans and Democrats. I don't really know how serious the Republicans are in terms of protecting against CBDC. And I know that they do want to focus on crypto donors.

And Trump Jr. has said that he wants to start his own crypto in order to, as a check against the Federal Reserve. As I said, well, you know, there's a way that you could have done that with Trump as president, but that didn't happen. Dr. Shiva is back now. Okay, good. All right, Dr. Shiva has come back. Welcome back.

And again, we've got a question for you, Dr. Shiva. Can you ask Dr.iva about trump taking money from the addelsons to benefit another country yeah i mean the big thing with trump and this comes back to this i think general question david about loyalty to the united states yeah um and and the whole i think it's it's very related to what the founders, I think, were really looking for when they wanted loyalty to the Constitution. It's very deeply related, in my view, to Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, when we talk about natural-born citizens and this reality. That's about loyalty, as you said. It's about divided loyalty. Who is more loyal, the person who takes $100 million from another country and says,

I'm going to make sure you're going to own the presidency, and I'm going to make sure that you also own Congress again? I mean, who's got the loyalty there? Well, so if we go back to the 1700s, Hamilton and madison had many many deep conversations about this um which uh john yinger a scholar at suny has talked about and he's documented bottom line is that when you really unravel all of this and i don't have time to do a historic analysis here but bottom line the founders felt that their theory was those people are natural born just solely on the soil would be loyal those people who fought for this country the marquis de lafayette was made a natural born citizen quote unquote natural born it's never defined by the way yeah yeah quite interesting he was born in France but they made him a natural born citizen and all of his heirs

and then they carved out for naturalized citizens about 10 000 or more of them that they too could be president in 1787. okay there were seven signers of the constitution, including William Patterson were born in England or other parts. They too could become president. So it's not like the founders had this very clear view. Oh, anyone who was born outside of the United States is going to be disloyal. The general notion was that a naturalized citizen who became part of this country and natural born and include including someone like the marquis de lafayette they gave him the nom de plume of natural born

quite interesting yeah now you forwarded to today to answer your question we have 99.99 percent of people in congress are natural born citizens yet they have to give their oath to aipac trump just got 100 million because he basically says i mean you look at his speech he just gave that you know israel should be expanded he will do whatever it takes to support his his uh he'll put israel first yeah and that's what's occurred in the united states now you take someone like me when i became a naturalized citizen i had to give up my indian citizenship which allowed me to be prime minister or president there i had to take an oath of allegiance which natural born citizens do not need to take saying that i will take arms up for the united states that i will not follow any

foreign powers and i will not have dual citizenship okay i had to do that as a naturalized citizen who the hell are these people say that i cannot run for president yeah let me ask you about that because you know uh trump endorsed dr oz who uh said well i'm not gonna get in the turkish army yeah he was fought in the turkish army and he said and i'm not going to give up my turkish citizenship unless I'm elected. And then that case, I will give it up so that I can get in on the classified information and everything. It's like, what? You know, it's like, where is this guy?

But how was he able to, you said you had to give up your foreign citizenship. I had to give up my passport. I had to give up my foreign citizenship and oath allegiance i mean if you look at the naturalized citizens oath of allegiance yeah it's quite remarkable that everyone doesn't have to take that oath david i wonder yeah i wonder why dr oz uh still had his citizenship in uh in turkey and you know he still has it because he lost but he was right that was endorsed by trump you know exactly so the reality is um the we have to look at what these people say what they do trump is a complete bs-er okay he says anything that needs to be said that's right at the time to get whatever he wants okay yeah and the oath of allegiance says i hereby

declare an oath right that i absolutely entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentiate state or sovereignty of whom or which I have therefore been a subject or citizen that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. I mean, there's other provisions there, but you're not supposed you're supposed to give a full oath to this country right against all enemies foreign and domestic that i will bear to fake true faith and allegiance to the same that i will bear arms on behalf of the united states when required by law that i will perform non-combatant service in the armed forces of the united states when required by law that i will perform work of national importance under civil direction and required by the law and that and that i take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion so natural born citizens do not have to take that oath yeah that's right i can get deported if i don't fight for the united states

think about that yeah so we need to understand in many ways a naturalized you took natural and you eyes them you naturalize them okay is equal i would argue it's even higher than natural born natural born citizens do not need to take this over yeah that's right yeah it's interesting you know back in the it's something that's's talked about in terms of my Christian religion. When I talk about the fact that God has adopted us, they point out that in Roman society, you could disown your natural born child. But if you had adopted somebody, you couldn't get rid of them. You couldn't disown an adopted child, you know? So it's kind of the same argument that you're making there so it's in wisconsin and new jersey right now where lala is trying to

rig the election and i well no no in no no in new jersey it's lala in wisconsin it's trump oh really okay yeah because whoever thinks they're going to have a chance at winning that state. Right. Right. The point is that our candidacy, my candidacy is is the elephant in the room. We're not just some frivolous candidate. We have a movement. People know about me. People know I was the one who fought for people against, you know, the election fraud. People know that it was I who exposed the backdoor portal to Twitter. People know is the one I who fought against the lockdowns. Boobie Kennedy supported lockdowns. Trump supported lockdowns.

Biden supported lockdowns. They know I'm the real fighter, David. And they know that we're not going to just get five or 10 votes like Roger Calero. We're going to get hundreds of thousands of votes, which can disrupt this election. Oh, yeah. So both parties are violating the law and do not recognize the 12th amendment or the 20th amendment that only congress can qualify a candidate and this is what's called it's known in legal terms as a non-justiciable issue yeah that even the courts

can't rule on it's a part of the political process if you want mickey mouse on the ballot and a bunch of electors want him on the ballot and electors vote for that person then congress will have to say well mickey mouse you know he's a cartoon character he can't be that's congress is what decides that yeah the states have no jurisdiction they do not have any jurisdiction to qualify the potentially pledged candidate of the office of electors. It's like fundamental constitution. And it's amazing how many judges don't know this. That's right.

How many lawyers don't know this? I was speaking to Ralph Nader's lawyer for 30 years. He goes, oh, my God, you know, you're absolutely right. Because this makes no sense. They have no right to take you off the ballot they can go after the electors if the electors weren't residents if they weren't citizens but you're there it's presumptive they're putting the cart before the horse yeah that's right and what we have the fake electors the the issues with that of course is the electors have to be declared by some legal authority, typically the board

of elections. As I said, when they were contesting this, if the, you know, there were four states, Republican legislatures, two of them had Republican governors, and said they wanted to contest that, they could have, since they weren't having any luck in the courts, they could have gone to the legislature. If the legislature would have said, we recognize that slate of electors, then you would have had a determination would have to been made in Congress on the on January the 6th as to which slate of electors were they going to recognize. Were they going to recognize the ones that came from the legislature or the ones that came from the governorship? And I've got all these these people that I've talked to. Republicans don't get that either. They don't understand that, you know, it has to be a recognized slate of electors.

And this is a slate of electors that is sent to Washington. But I told people on 2020, I said, you know, when you look at election corruption, long before you have all the issues about counting votes and custody of the vote, the process,

the beginning, it all begins election. Corruption begins with ballot access. And that's exactly what you're fighting. exactly so we to let everyone know be defiant what we are we will be except for four states write us in write in dr steven dr shiva write us in and about 15 states would be listed on the ballot says for now david unless kamala harrison trump go do this you know when i decided to run reinz previous told a friend of mine who's on the board of he said oh my god dr she was running this is going to be disrupted that's from right reinz previous yeah right right and it's

quite telling that none of these podcasters in fact none of the so-called anti-zionist podcasters dare put me on their show and if you look at my followers on Twitter, 366 on Facebook, 200 or whatever, five 20, five 40 on YouTube, two 50 has stayed the same for two years, David.

Oh yeah. Tell me about it. I've stayed the same for eight years. Um, there you go. You know, they, they capped me and I look at people,

I see videos that come up and it's like, why am I seeing this? I look at the fact that they've got like 4,000 people have seen whatever it is that they've got there, and yet they've only got 900 followers. It's like, how in the world do I have only a couple hundred people have seen this when I'm supposedly got 136,000 followers? They're obviously curating the content, that is that really is the issue and and so yeah i'm glad to have you on people need to understand what this is and uh let's understand what the time frame is on this as well so where are you right now in new jersey the time frame is

ballots get printed remember military around mid-september which means they're designing the ballots which means all of this is right now so anyone listening number one you know hit up uh everyone you know tell them to go to shiva for president.com download our cards shiva for president.com slash cards start handing out our write-in and our vote cards everywhere we have to disrupt these guys they need to know that we the people are a disruptive force that's what what our campaign represents. All of these elections are selections right now. The Zionist swarm is deciding who will give them the better benefits. Will it be Kamala Harris or will it be Trump? So Trump is, you know, bending over to them in any way possible. He took a hundred million from Sheldon Adelson's wife, right? He'll probably go bomb the entire middle East or you'll say he'll do that, anything.

And Kamala Harris and that plan, it's basically two wings of the swarm deciding, how much they're gonna serve an entity, which has nothing to do with the United States, except to get us into war. War leads into printing money, printing money leads to inflation, which increases cost of living,

which, so you have cost of living going up, you have lifespan going down. That's what the swarm has gotten you. The only force against that is Shiba for president and the movement for truth, freedom, health, and all of you. We need to build a bottoms up movement. That's the only way forward.

And the thing I want to say, David, is you're one of the few people who puts us on. Podcasters. You know, I have an interview with Mike Adams coming up. You know, Mike will put us on to the extent where people say, hey, you better put Dr. Shiva on. Okay. Because Mike needs to maintain his credibility. I said before you came on, I had somebody put a comment on there and said, when are you going to have Dr. Shiva on?

I said, funny you'd mention that. We got him coming up in the third hour. So, yeah. Yeah. So, but you will notice these so-called anti-Zionist, pro-Palestinian guys are talking big game. Well, why aren't you supporting me? I'm the only anti-Zionist candidate. Because they're using anti-Zionism, many of these so-called anti-Zionists and pro-Palestinian, and they're making money off the deal. The anti-Zionist, pro-Palestinian movement

has been taken over by liberal Zionists who push, quote-unquote, ceasefire for 40 years. They don't want to talk about the real solution, which is end the occupation of America. That's what we should talk about. End the occupation of America by foreign influence and foreign governments. And Trump serves Israel.

Kamala Harris serves Israel. kamala harris serves israel booby kennedy serves israel they do not serve the american working people yeah he says the quiet part right out loud and of course you are the only real anti-vax candidate that is out there anti-lockdown as you point out as well not not that i'm the one who ran the biggest protests in New Jersey against Phil Murphy. And we stopped the anti we stopped the vaccine mandate bill. Boobie Kennedy was trying to negotiate with the Democrats. We did a massive militant protest and scared the hell out of them. Yeah. So this is why they do not want one of us, David, coming up from below fighting for us. So they have to anoint. That's what you're witnessing right now. Kamala Harris has to go after me in New Jersey. Trump has to go after me in Wisconsin because they do not want any independent movements. They don't want someone like me who came from nothing coming up, David, or us. That's what I represent. And that's what this is about. This is a huge opportunity for people to get involved well wherever that's the key you can write us in yeah that's the key it's got to come from the bottom up and it's not just this but it's also uh making the connections and

and starting uh to to get the community so that you can uh have an impact there locally because it has to be done at the local level all politics is local and that's what they understood and i played a clip earlier from lala harris when when they had the mainstream media was begging her to do vaccine passports like France. And she said, well, you know, we put out the guidance and everything, but, you know, we turn it over to the local people. They bribe the local officials. And if you don't have good local officials who are principled and who are going to stand against this stuff, that's why I keep telling everybody I cover national politics because I want people to focus from the bottom up and that's what you're doing as well you're getting what we've done is at every level the reason we you know one of our biggest reasons and the success of running for president now we have leaders in all communities all over the united states who've emerged bottoms

up and by the way everyone who collects signatures for, they all have full-time jobs or they're retired people. You know, we didn't go and raise 20 million like Boobie Kennedy did to go pay people to collect signatures for us. Everything we've done is bottoms up everything. So I really want to let everyone know that if you truly want to save yourself, no one's coming to save you. There's a movement that exists. And we're the only game in town, truth, freedom,

help.com because we will teach you. We'll give you the tools. It's not about me. It's not about anyone else. It's about you learning how to fight. Yeah. And in order to learn how to fight, you have to understand the science of systems,

these interconnections, who the swarm is, how the enemy operates. But without that knowledge, you're always going to be 10 steps backward because I'll give you the next Trump, the next booby Kennedy, the next Obama, the next fool who will talk a good game, the next Bernie Sanders. And their job is to distract you and make you fat, dumb, and lazy. So you don't build a bottoms up movement yeah they don't they want they want you thinking that there's an easy way out there's no easy way out you got to do your homework you got to get on

the ground you have to do the work that's right and that's how we win there's no other way to win we have to save ourselves very important they're so clueless in terms of they don't understand they use the labels whatever they come up with it's like okay well we'll call this more woke and so yeah we'll call the marxist approach as used by mal we'll call that woke we'll wear the red hats and all the rest of the stuff and it's like they don't understand uh history they don't understand what's happened in other countries they don't understand the global agenda they don't understand who the players are and what they stand for in america and most importantly they don't understand that it's all about local and

going from the bottom up let me ask you um since i'm in tennessee are you going to be on the ballot in tennessee yep it looks like we're already on there david they gave us they told us we are good good okay well good maybe i'll not maybe i will show up then on election day give me a reason to get to the polls now look when you vote for look, when you vote for, when you vote for Shiva for president, what you're really saying is that I want to save myself and I want to build a bottom-up movement. Yeah. And when you write us in, you're saying,

I don't believe in any of these guys. And every vote we take away from them is a vote for you, working people, realizing that your consciousness has been raised. That's a good thing. I i agree every person who raises their consciousness understands this concept and votes for shiva for president that's what they're really doing they're saying you know i don't elections or selections and here's a guy who's coming bottoms up that's someone like me my family where i came up and that's the kind of people we want. So you're actually voting for a bottom-set movement when you vote for shooting the president.

Yes. And you're getting off the plantation. Yeah, it's very important, and people can go to your website and sign up and get on the mailing list and find out what is going on with these ballot access cases. This is breaking news. And it is very important that we keep our ballots open. It's been one of my pet peeves.

And, again they i've seen the games that they play and how they keep people off the ballot when we were in north carolina they would collude with believe it or not the uh the the media organizations there in north carolina they would actually have the debates run by them and even though there was only going to be three candidates on the ballot, they would exclude the third candidate. And, you know, that was the media. You would think that they would want to have something that would be open and lively.

But no, it's all controlled. And so it begins with the ballot access. Very interested to see what happens with this. We'll be following this. Thank you so much for what you're doing. Thank you for coming on. And thanks, David. Again, thanks for having us on. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Be well, David. Best to you and much for what you're doing thank you for coming on and thanks david again thanks for having us on thank you thank you thank you be well david best to you and travis thank you

thank you very much okay thank you for president folks.com that'll you can go there and keep up with what is happening things are breaking very fast for him uh but it is uh it's good to know that um somebody has uh at least take a look at at the organization that he's got and try to get things done from the bottom up. And so when we look at what is happening across the country, I'll just mention this real quickly. I won't have time to get into it today, but I thought it was interesting. People don't know what is happening. One example of this is civil asset forfeiture i said years ago when megan kelly who was a big wig at fox at the time

before she was i don't know she quit or she was fired i don't remember uh but uh she came to interview alex and she interviewed all of us and in our discussion i mentioned civil asset forfeiture she did not know what that was she supposedly is a lawyer by background but she really doesn't care so here's an example uh the cops pulled over a fedex express truck they opened up the package it had 42 000 inside and they just decided they would keep it uh they said, the FedEx driver said, basically it's a court fight in Indiana. They were inspecting a package that was routed by FedEx through its hub there. They opened it up and found $42,000 in cash and just kept it. This is called civil asset forfeiture.

They claim that they can keep the property without charging you with a crime, without finding you guilty, because they're going to do this as a civil process. Something that is a rule that was passed by the bureaucracy, not a law that was passed by your elected representatives. Again, do elections mean anything if we are ruled by the bureaucrats? Do elections mean anything if they can keep us off the ballot? Do elections mean anything if any of these bureaucrats can steal whatever they wish from you and say that you have to sue them in order to get it back? We have taxation without representation. We have regulation and we have confiscation without representation. Thank you for joining us.

Have a good day. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com. That's a website.