The David Knight Show - 20Mar23 Censors Admit: TRUTH Will Make You "Vaccine Hesitant", and Fauci's OTHER Poison

Episode Date: March 20, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESCDC purchased private data location information on over 55 million Americans to see if people were complying with lockdown. YOU are the disease the "center" wants to "control" 2:26Fauci's OTHER Poison: It Also Has a Large Body Count. He had no evidence to make Remdesavir "the standard of care" but now we have the evidence that it has already killed, in one estimation, over 100,000 people 14:38German Health Minister Lauterbach admits he lied about vaccine side-effect rates. 23:41New Twitter files show that the government-backed Stanford initiative told Big Tech to censor TRUE information about vaccines. If they told you the TRUTH, you'd become "vaccine hesitant" — for ALL vaccines. 27:41Sudden INJECTION Death: SIDS (and SADS). Remember VAERS was set up to track death and injury from CHILDHOOD VACCINES. Now FDA is still using EUA (with NO emergency) to demand jabs for babies 6 months and up during "well child" visits 42:54Govt Report on Fluoride Hidden: Deliberate Dumbing Down of America. HHS, NIH, EPA all complicit in hiding research showing fluoride lowers IQ in children. But here's the simple reason we always KNEW it was a dangerous fraud 52:40Pensions wiped out in the 2nd largest Swiss bank's "rescue", bailed-in by both the Swiss central bank and the largest Swiss bank. Larry Fink, Blackrock CEO, says pensions are a global "silent crisis" 1:14:25Thought savings interest rates were absurdly low? Central bankers salivate over NEGATIVE INTEREST rates made easy with CBDC 1:18:15We are in a fight for the future of money, liberty and privacy — CBDC. How the moves of the last week are an attack on crypto, cash and small banks 1:38:09Reuters and mainstream media prepare the public for a takedown of financial system, blaming Russian hackers. Vault7 leak shows they're lying 1:56:33Artist loses his YouTube music channel when his satire, "mRNA and the Speed of Science", goes viral 2:06:01Stormy weather is coming Trump’s way. 2:12:22Trump prosecution is political persecution. But like Dennis Hastert, the longest serving Speaker of the House, who was punished for a NON-CRIME instead of being punished for the REAL CRIME of being a pedophile, Trump will get amnesty for his real crime from the MAGA cult and from government & media 2:21:20MAGA media shills are demanding that Desantis “defy” any Trump arrest. You see, it's just as political on the right and political perseuction will be used for a political Civil War in GOP 2:36:21Stormy Weather Ahead for Trump. Clinton committed perjury to cover up his consensual sex with Lewinsky. Trump may be indicted for covering up his buying sex from a porn star prostitute. The irony is that neither LEFT nor RIGHT care about having a president with integrity. It's an indictment of the American people who support, and continue to support, oath breakers and liars foolishly believing they'll obey the Constitution and keep their oath to it and the voters. 2:38:05How the BATF has gotten financial information from IRS on potential gun buyers for warrantless tracking reports. 2:49:09Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 20th of March, year of our Lord, 2023. Day 1,103 of the lockdown. Is anybody talking about the emergency orders? Is anybody talking about stopping the Trump shots? No, we're talking about defending Trump from being arrested. You ought to be arrested for what he did to us in 2020.

Not for this thing, but for what he did to us. Never forget that. And it is an indictment of MAGA that they support this guy. We'll be talking about that. And it is an indictment of MAGA that they support this guy. We'll be talking about that, but before we do, we're going to talk about the direct threats to us. Not just our delusions, but the direct threats to us with the pharmaceutical issues. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Yes, I continue to talk about the emergency executive order that President Trump did because it has so many tentacles that goes into every aspect of our life. It was the year that he destroyed our rule of law, destroyed our society. And under the Trump CDC, they purchased private data location information on over 55 million

Americans. Well, they've got our number. Do you have his number? Do you understand what this guy's about yet? He funded that. Just like he funded all of these governors the worst of them republican and democrat the worst of them he kept giving them money he gave money to the cdc he gave money to fauci he kept fauci on the podium you know even as we look at this lockdown celebration look at the glee of burke's and

of fauci and of Trump. There's Trump grinning. So I'm going to have to let him speak. The small print here. In states with evidence of community transmission, bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other indoor

and outdoor venues where groups of people congregate should be closed. Look at that. He's so happy. Mr. President, are you talented? Yeah, Mr. President, Mr. President. Because you're Mr. President. You're the guy that put these Fauci and Birx, you put them on the podium.

You kept them on the podium. You played Stooge. Well, what if we inject sunlight into our veins? Oh, and then we got, and then right away he talks about something that does work. To discredit what does work. Look, from the very beginning, Greg Abbott, and or Pritzker or Cuomo, all the Democrats. And then there's the Republicans like Brad Little in Idaho, Mike DeWine in Ohio, Greg

Abbott, Texas, and even DeSantis at the beginning. He was using these funds for this type of stuff. But Greg Abbott reported on a $300,000 contract to a little tiny firm that nobody had ever heard of. Just came into existence. The guy had basically no background, no employees. We didn't go there, but there was a local reporter who went there and showed that it was just an empty office. Nobody was there. Greg Abbott gave them $300 million to do contact tracing. And I said, well, I hope this is just financial fraud. What would be even worse is if they can actually do something.

Well, the CDC spent, under Trump, $420,000 for one company. Another one they gave $208,000 to. This was to check how citizens were complying with lockdown under Trump and with other COVID restrictions under Trump. The stuff that I'm seeing outraged me over the weekend. And I wrote an op-ed piece about it. And just before I hit publish, I had second thoughts about it.

I am going to put it out, but I'm going to put it out with a bit more clarity about what I'm going to say, because it's really not so much a criticism of Trump as it is a criticism of MAGA and the people who slavishly hold him up. This is coming. So many media outlets will rage against the vaccine to celebrate Trump and tell you that he is our only hope. Wayne Allen, op-ed piece. And he's got another one now. The only hope for our country is Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis.

And we've got to keep them working together instead of against each other, because to save this country, we have to use a presidency. No, the presidency is the enemy. We has met the enemy and he is us. He is the U S government. And the president is the biggest enemy in the U S government, the office of president. It's the U.S. government. And the president is the biggest enemy in the U.S. government,

the office of president. It doesn't matter who's there. Nobody ever does anything. So anyway, $420,000 to one company, $208,000 to the other. The CDC wanted data that they deemed necessary in order to properly react, to properly react to what we were doing. Look, we have to understand all this stuff, the $300,000 that was given to Greg, that Greg Abbott spent for contact tracing, what the CDC was doing. I guess, you know, that's the control part, right? Center for Disease Control. You're the disease.

You're the disease. You're the virus. That's what the environmentalists have always been saying. And that's the way the CDC was acting. You're the disease. We've got to control you. Everybody was treated as if they were diseased. And again, look at the story that we had just a couple of weeks ago

about a woman arrested because they said she had tuberculosis. She says, I don't have tuberculosis. They don't have to prove it. They have to just they got a test that says that you got a little bit of tuberculosis or whatever. It doesn't, you know, and by that I mean a little bit of tuberculosis. You're not sick. You blow a positive on a PCR test or something, right? And there's not enough of a viral load

to transfer the disease to anybody. But they use it, same way they use this other stuff. So the test is the way they lock you away, put you away. And since when have we ever put away people who really did have tuberculosis? We never quarantine people with that. As a matter of fact, I have a relative with early, with, I don't know what stage prostate cancer is in,

but they used, the treatment they used was to give them tuberculosis. What in the world? I'd never heard of that. It came about in the late 1980s i think so does that mean you get your cancer treatment and you immediately go into isolation is that what that's about never done that before as i said you know i'd like to see him try that with doc holiday uh this included tracking people for the sake of evaluating the impact of visits to key points of interest.

You know, like churches. Because churches were the number one thing on the CDC's list, you know. That was a place where you're going to get the most sick. And we hug in people, singing, and all that kind of stuff. Church meetings. So to evaluate the impact of visits to key points of interest, stay-at-home orders, closures, reopenings, other public health communications related to the mask mandate,

other emerging research areas on transmission and so forth. And so these companies were one called SafeGraph and another one called Cubic. Very clever. C-U-E-B-I-Q, Cubic. They got the data from apps that are on the phone that are spying on you and grabbing information and giving it to people like Safegraft and Cubic. So they can give it to the CDC, and the CDC at some point can come around and lock you up because you didn't comply with their orders to stay in your home. Cubic sold its Shelter-in-Place Index database,

and it revealed how long a phone is inside of a house, expressed in percentages. It's your big brother device. I've said it over and over again. That series of slides that Snowden released, but it was only published in Der Spiegel in Germany. And the series of slides said, who would have thought in 1984, and it shows the Apple 1984 commercial

that was done for the introduction of the Macintosh by Ridley Scott. Who would have thought in 1984 that this would become Big Brother and you've got Steve Jobs holding up the iPhone? And the third slide is, and that the zombies would line up to pay for it. It's Big Brother. What are they doing? They know that your phone's going to be on you. And so how long has your phone been in the house? Because that means how long you've been in the house. So they would express it as percentages and do it based on

individuals. The goal was to assess who was sheltering in place as authorities had mandated. The contracts were signed in 2021, but the CDC at first, early into the pandemic, got a taste of the two companies' location data for free. So they were preparing all this, and it was the money that Trump put out. And of course, Biden just came in as a tag team, as a professional wrestling tag team. He just taps in and continues on where Trump was,

because it's a globalist plant. And both of them are traitors to this country. Biden and Trump are traitors. Both of them. Brazil had a secret program to track people's location via cell phone. Geospatial intelligence has been the fastest growing part of the intelligence community. And it goes back to the 1990s when it became possible for them to implement the internet fully. Internet was something that was designed by J.C.R. Licklider, a psychologist working for DARPA. And once it became practical, the switching stuff,

then they created their own venture capital firms to make sure that they were picking the people who were going to be allowed to compete. They didn't care who won. Yeah, by all means, go for it. Compete with each other, 100%, because we want the strongest person to win. But we will determine who's going to be allowed to compete with our venture capital funding. So CIA actually went public with In-Q-Tel,

but you had deep state intelligence community people on the boards of all the big venture capital firms picking who's going to do that because they can scrape this data off and they can learn so much about us. In the first three years, a former Brazilian president, Bolsonaro, by the way, whenever I say his name, Bolsonaro, my transcript program always says it as bows and arrows, buttons and bows. Okay. A tool called First Mile allowed, without any justification, the intelligence agency to monitor the locations of up to 10,000 phones every 12 now this wasn't developed in brazil and if you think it's only being used by

the brazilian government i got a bridge to sell you it was developed by an israeli firm cognite and it was purchased for six million dollars the tool could provide real-time alerts of a target's movement at different locations. The use of the tool was so controversial that even the agents who were using it, the agency in Brazil that was doing this, the country's intelligence agency, even the spies were concerned about it. That's called the A B I N. Even the A B I N agents questioned it and it resulted in an internal review. And,

um, uh, the Brazilian constitution does not expressly ban access to cell phone metadata. Uh, the, um, you know,

same interpretation that we see given all the time to the U.S. Constitution. Well, it doesn't say that we can't do this, so I guess we can't. No, the U.S. Constitution makes it very clear in the Tenth Amendment that everything is prohibited to the federal government unless it is expressly permitted. But they turn that upside down and inside out. They say everything is permitted unless it is expressly prohibited. That is not what the Constitution says.

That is a lie. Of course, Brazil, I don't know what they have. That may work for them, but it certainly doesn't work for us. But we operate under the same principle. Now, I've talked many times about Remdesivir. Fauci's favorite drug company, Gilead, are one of them. He's got so many. So many that are friends with him.

So many that probably give him money. Above the table or under the table, who knows? But Remdesivir was extremely suspect. He had been the marketing guy for Remdesivir for many times. He had tried to sell it for aids people said doesn't work and it destroys your liver uh i'm sorry kidney i think it is renal and um renal is kidneys right um anyway um so it's very it's you know killed a lot of people with that. So they said it doesn't work for AIDS. So then he tried it again with Ebola.

Same story. Doesn't work, very dangerous. And then we had COVID. And the way this operated was you had, and I've talked about this many times, the World Health Organization published a study that was done in China. And it showed that it was actually more people died who were given remdesivir,

according to them, than the control group that was not given it. And that went up on the World Health Organization's website and was there for just a couple of hours, went down, was taken down. And I reported that. And then within a week, Fauci comes back with his own study, not peer-reviewed, his own study. And again, it shows that it's not effective. In the Chinese study, two or three more people died with it than the control group, but it was in the statistical error.

In other words, it doesn't have any effect. In Fauci's study, same thing, except he had one or two more people who survived with it. But again, it was so close, it was in the statistical noise, and it was a wash, zero efficacy. But what Fauci said, and he changed the standard of this, because this is a treatment. This is not, you know, a vaccine was supposed to be, until they changed the definitions of it, a vaccine was supposed to train your immune system

to prevent you from getting a disease. A therapeutic is supposed to cure the disease. So he changed that definition as well for remdesivir. And he said, well, yeah, don't make no difference with the people who get it. But if you survive, I determined that these people got better 30% faster. Right. So that was the basis. And he pronounced it, if you remember, the standard of care.

Well, now we've got some more information about it. This is from the expose. And you also find it on vaccineimpact.com. The FDA authorized this experimental drug May of 2020. By October 2020, it had received full approval. And it remains the primary treatment for COVID in hospitals. Using a Freedom of Information request, this individual received all the death certificates. His name is Baudoin, I guess, B-E-A-U-D-O-I-N.

He received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022. He produced graphs. Pull up the graph to show that. From the information he received and found 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure. So he also revealed an increase in deaths from acute renal failure. So he also revealed an increase in deaths from acute renal failure in every age group over 15 years old from 2015 to 2022. Thousands dead in Massachusetts, acute renal failure likely due to remdesivir. He says this requires a criminal investigation.

Everything that's been done to us the last couple of years requires a criminal investigation. And this is about the second or third article under pharma. I want you to show that chart if you can. What he did was he put up a chart as part of his report, and he looked at the baseline information. So he had five years of baseline information from 2015 to 2019. And it varied from a high of 1,269 to a low of 1,092. And then what happened in 2020, there's a chart, went up to 1,500.

And then it went up the next year to 1,763. And then the next year, 2,306. And here's how that works out. You get a 54% excess deaths in 2021, 100% excess deaths in 2022. It seems like it is coincident with something that we see happening. The introduction of remdesivir. And this has always been listed as one of the, as the issue. Why people said, well, first of all, it doesn't work.

Secondly, it's very unsafe because of this. The first shipments received May 2020. At the time, according to Gilead's website, it was not known if remdesivir is safe or effective for the treatment of COVID. Scientists who closely watched the clinical trials of remdesivir unfold over the six months leading up to an agreement signed to supply remdesivir to the EU and the FDA's full approval, scientists were baffled by both of those decisions. And it was clear. It's interesting to me that in this expose article, and it's excellent,

nobody talks about Fauci's role in all of this. This is where his role needs to be talked about. Yeah, there's a lot of stuff happening at the lab, but nobody, nobody, even all of these Republicans, you know, Rand Paul, all the rest of them who are hammering Fauci over the lab. Do any of them want to shut down the military's bioweapon program, gain of function, this operation paperclip crime that's been going on since the end of World War II? They won't touch that with a 10-foot pole. They won't even mention it. They'll personalize it about Fauci.

Here's something that they ought to personalize because this is outright corruption. He alone is responsible for this. And he got this pushed and approved in the FDA. Then they used that to get the approval in the EU. And the scientists are saying, this doesn't make any sense. Well, it doesn't make any science sense. It doesn't make any medical sense. It doesn't make any medical sense. It makes perfectly good sense.

They were talking about political corruption. 15th of October, 2020, the fourth and largest control study delivered what some believed was a coup de grace against remdesivir. The World Health Organization's solidarity trial showed that remdesivir did not reduce mortality or the time COVID patients took to recover. That was, again, you know, Fauci changing the standard. Well, it's supposed to, if it's a therapeutic, it's supposed to cure people. Oh, it doesn't cure people, but they get better fast. Well, they said, no, it doesn't. Oh, it doesn't cure people, but they get better fast. Well, they said, no, it doesn't.

No, it doesn't even do that. It makes money for Gilead. That's what it does. 20th of November, 2020, the WHO issued a recommendation against the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients, regardless of the disease severity, as there was no evidence that improved survival or any other positive outcomes. It doesn't do anything to help you when you've got a respiratory illness, but what it does is it causes renal failure. First, do no harm.

That's what they're supposed to be focused on. 22nd of April, 2022. The WHO changed its recommendation. They updated the recommendation that remdesivir can be used in mild or moderate COVID patients who are at high risk of hospitalization. What's changed? Nothing about the science. There's no new study. They just talk to the right people, just like they talk to the right people to get the WHO

to take down that study from China at the very beginning. Dr. Paul Merrick, a pulmonary critical care specialist, founding member of the Frontline Critical Care Alliance, explained that during the pandemic the only drug he was allowed to prescribe was remdesivir the standard of care and that it increases the risk of kidney failure 20 fold 20 fold so uh now we've got a german health minister the german health minister the gesundheit fuhrer and as eric peters likes to call him this guy really is the gesundheit fuhrer he is the fuhrer of the health uh he is germany's minister of the health he once claimed that covid vaccination was free of any and all side effects. He admitted last week that he was wrong. He said adverse reactions occur at a rate of one in 10,000 doses, and that can cause severe disabilities.

You know, when you look at things, when you look at death rates, for example, right? You typically see things, you know, for, uh, the, the big ones are more than, you know, uh, 10 per 100,000. They usually do it as a case situation per 100,000. And, um, you know, you see other things like, uh, drowning or suicide or whatever. It's in this range. And he says, Oh, that's not a big deal. You know, heart attacks are going to be a little bit bigger. Cancer is going to be a little bit bigger. But 10 per 100,000, that's pretty big.

And we're not talking about deaths. We're talking about, quote, severe disabilities. On August the 14th, he had said, and his name is Karl Lauterbach. He said on Twitter that the vaccines had, quote, no side effects. He further questioned why some Germans refused to get vaccinated against COVID-19, the Gesundheit Fuhrer. But then on March the 12th, Lauterbach was asked by an anchor on German television about the claim that he made during the summer of 2021. Now, why is that happening? Well, it's because the same network had, just prior to that, done a segment about several Germans who'd been seriously injured after getting the shot,

including a 17-year-old gymnast who previously competed in the German Artistic Gymnastics Championship. She was hospitalized for more than a year shortly after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer jab. And so there were a lot of stories about that. And he responded and said the tweet was misguided and an exaggeration. there were a lot of stories about that. And, um, he responded and said the tweet was misguided and an exaggeration that he made at the time, noting that it quote did not represent my true position. In other words, did he lie?

If, if his position is X and he says something that is not his true position, then he's giving you his false position, which means that he lied for Pfizer BioNTech. You know, the German partner of Pfizer. He says, I've always been aware of the numbers, and they've remained relatively stable. One in 10,000 injured. Some say it's a lot. Some say it's a lot.

Some say it's not so many. There will be no shocking memories. And the prevailing motion will be one of nostalgia for those left behind. Combined with a spirit of bold curiosity for the adventure ahead. Ah! Ah! Yeah, we've got a, we've had a lot of Nazis over the last few years, haven't we? Some of them speak with a New York accent instead of a German accent. What's happened to these people, he said, is absolutely dismaying. And every single case is too many.

I honestly feel very sorry for these people. Oh, does he really? There are severe disabilities, and some of them will be permanent. But you must do it for the following, right? New Twitter files show that the government-backed Stanford Initiative told big tech to censor true information about COVID jabs. They lied to us. We always knew they were lying.

Been saying that for three years. They never believed that what they were censoring was false. And so this is Matt Taibbi's latest Twitter file dig. And what we see is that just like the German Gesundheit Führer, they said, well, that's not my true position. I was just telling you a lie. And if you're telling people true stuff about vaccines, or if you're even asking questions, you know, and they said, well, you know, a lot of people will

ask questions. I'm just asking, you know, asking for a friend, right? I don't know. Let me put this up there, you know, and I see a lot of, and I'm not going to call them out. But I see a lot of people doing this that are skeptical of the vaccines and other things. Like, do whatever you want. I'm going to be direct. I'm not going to do something like, oh, look at this. What do you think about this? Oh, and I know normal people, I like their work. And I guess they could justify it by saying, look, I'm on Twitter and you're effectively not.

By using these indirect things. But they were saying that they needed to cut down on people like that. Now, you could have some people who were asking legitimate questions. But they said, we got a lot of people who are putting this in the form of a rhetorical question, and they're really making a statement with that, right? According to the latest installment of files posted to Twitter on Friday by journalists, yes, he is a journalist.

I had some clips. I never played them last week. I should grab those things and play them sometime. It really is funny. Um, it's these, uh, women in Congress coming after Matt Taibbi, you know,

I'm a journalist. I don't know what you are. And I think, well, I worked for Rolling Stone. I've done all this for years. Yeah. Matt Taibbi is a real journalist.

He doesn't push an agenda. But you see, that's the way the Congress sees a real journalist. A real journalist is somebody who's going to push the information they want. No, that's a propagandist. And if they ever license journalism, which is, you know, a lot of discussion and moves towards trying to do that, they'll shut down anybody who's honest. Anyway, the Virality Project was a Stanford University Institute thing that was launched in May of 2020. It received federal funding from the Department of Defense. How many times do we have to see this coming from the Department of Defense, DOD, and coming from the intelligence community.

Operation Warp Speed. We've got the military. It's going to deliver everything from this, from the very beginning. DARPA's involved in News Guard. DARPA's involved in Election Guard. They run it through Microsoft, but they're giving them the money. Election Guard, to protect the integrity of our elections. We have DARPA involved in that.

And DARPA is at war with us. Just understand that. These people are now focusing on all the different brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence and all the rest of this stuff, automated weapons to come after us. They are at war with us every bit as much as they're at war with anybody in any foreign country. You know, the instruments of defense abroad will become instruments

of tyranny at home, and DARPA makes sure that happens, along with Silicon Valley. It's one of the reasons why they're not going to let Silicon Valley Bank fail, because you need to understand that Amazon and Elon Musk, Starlink, and all the rest of this stuff, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, they're a big part of the military industrial complex, perhaps the biggest part right now.

When I had Peter Charret on, talking about the four battlegrounds, how do we stack up in these different areas against China? For the most part, they were technological. And the tip of the spear was all Silicon Valley stuff. We have to go to war to keep China from getting Taiwan's semiconductor industry, or we destroy it. If we can't hold off the chinese level it to the ground

that's where they see their their strategic priorities are all technology and these billionaire elitists who have been lavishly funded by them will be protected by them they are the ones who are too big to fail it It's not these particular banks. It's the people whose deposits they were protecting. They had to come against crypto, but at the same time, they're going to protect the military industrial complex, Silicon Valley. So, it was the Department of Defense and the National Science Foundation that was funding this initiative to censor true information.

True information. They instruct, Department of Defense and National Science Foundation, instructed big tech social media platforms like Twitter and TikTok to take action against admittedly true posts. Regarding the experimental COVID vaccines, the Trump shots, as part of its fight against so-called disinformation. The AB says, or the Stanford-led project flagged, quote, true content, which might promote vaccine hesitancy. So even if it's true, if it's something that's going to make people not take vaccines,

it's got to be shut down, says the military, allied with the people who are making the bioweapon to be used against the world's population. And isn't it interesting? And let me just say this, because I think Rand Paul has gone off the tracks with this stuff. You notice, and I've mentioned this before when he was hectoring Fauci about gain of function, which at this point is a total distraction,

because they're not going to do anything about gain of function. It's just about the Wuhan lab. And then he also said, you have made people hesitant to take their other vaccines. That was the charge that Rand Paul leveled at Fauci. And I said at the time, that is one of the most shameful things I've ever seen anybody do, especially somebody like Rand Paul who holds himself forth as somebody defending liberty. For the longest time, I said, my congress Congressman, even though I was living in other States, I said, my Congressman is Ron Paul because he's the only one that supports Liberty and

issues like that. And, um, the, uh, it's interesting that even though Rand Paul is from Kentucky, uh, the Congressman that I said, my Congressman, I guess it's from Kentucky and The congressman that I said, my congressman, I guess, is from Kentucky and is not Rand Paul. It's Massey, Thomas Massey. He's the one who has integrity to stand alone against the mob, including Trump. He stood alone against Trump on this financial stuff,

on the lockdown. The only one who stood against him. And Trump screamed, we've got to primary him out. We've got to get him out. Just like Gingrich went against Ron Paul years and years ago. Gingrich even went so far as to have the Republican establishment support Ron Paul's Democrat adversary. Didn't want him back.

Didn't want him back. Didn't want him back. Well, you know, that's where Thomas Massey is now. True content which might promote vaccine hesitancy is what the Department of Defense wanted to shut down and what Rand Paul wants to shut down. Of course, Rand Paul did not say shut down true information. He just hectored Fauci for giving vaccines a bad rap that's a distinction without a difference in my opinion

some of these true posts could fuel hesitancy especially things like celebrity deaths after vaccines that's real you get the bots will come out real fast. When somebody, oh, look, this guy was talking about how, and it is interesting. When you go back and you look at Justin Bieber, and you even go back and you look at Bruce Springsteen. Bruce Springsteen was obsessed with everybody being vaccinated

before they could come to his parties, you know, a year or so ago. And now he's canceling his tour because of unexplained health problems. I don't know. I mean, he's older, but still, he, you know, something came on him. Even to the extent that he would not recognize people who had been vaccinated with AstraZeneca for a while. And then he relented, you know, with a lot of pressure and pushback from

people. He's all right. All right. All right. We'll include AstraZeneca in it. You know, besides the ones that the CDC has given its seal of approval to. And now you see both Justin Bieber and Springsteen having issues. And Justin Bieber says, well, I think it's, you know, it's a blowback from a shingles type of thing.

Well, that's one of the side effects of vaccines. Yeah. It builds up, uh, that that's, that's one of them. As a matter of fact, um, there's, you know, they, they found, um, the, uh, connection and direct connection with the spikes in that. Anyway, this project, the Vitality Project, determined that posts that were critical of vaccine passports were misinformation.

And those who oppose discrimination based on vaccine status, quote, have driven a larger anti-vaccination narrative about the loss of rights and freedoms. Well, that's true. It was about the loss of rights and freedoms. Well, that's true. It was about the loss of rights and freedoms. And we should have that discussion as a society. And we should talk about how that's not allowed under the Constitution. You have no authority for that.

You've only got Trump's emergency order to do that. Well, I guess I'm guilty as charged and I'm proud of it. Tybee says the most pointed examples of factual information the group wanted to suppress under the guise of misinformation were true stories about people experiencing blood clots after receiving AstraZeneca vaccine. They said increased doubts in one manufacturer's vaccine may lead to hesitancy about vaccination overall. We must not criticize any of these Trump shots, not even something like AstraZeneca that came from the UK. Because if they criticize AstraZeneca, which is not even in the United States, that could cause vaccine hesitancy about the Trump shots, and it could cause vaccine hesitancy about the MMR shots and all the rest of these things that we've been talking about for decades now. The project also

took issue with any expression of curiosity about adverse reactions, alleging that, quote, just asking questions is a tactic commonly used by spreaders of misinformation to deflect culpability. You know, rhetorical questions, in other words. April 26, 2022 report issued by this group, the Vitality Project, called for a, quote, rumor control mechanism to address nationally trending narratives, unquote, and called for the creation of a misinformation and disinformation center at the Department of Homeland Security. Interestingly enough, as Matt Taibbi points out,

the very next day, you had Biden creating the disinformation governance board, putting in, as he calls her, the singing censor, Nina Jankowicz. Right. We all remember that until we etched into our minds. Um, that's the very next day that they did that. And then take a look.

When you go back and say rumor control mechanism to address nationally trending narratives. It's not just about lockdown. It's not just about masks or vaccines or vaccine passports. Now you've got Mark Kelly, Senator from Arizona and others saying, we need to have a way to censor people who are talking about the banking system and questioning whether or not the banks are solvent or what we're doing. And of course, that's going to definitely extend to CBDC. So Jonathan Turley said, all this is lost in the explosive news about Trump's expected arrest.

But he said, this is very important information to see that now we have the records showing that the government wanted social media to suppress true information. Information they knew was all this stuff about it being misinformation. We knew that was garbage. So we're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk first about the CBDC issues. But it is also important for us to talk about what is happening with Trump. And when we come back from the break, I have a little bit more information I want to give you about vaccines and about childhood vaccines and why you should be hesitant about it. Yet another example of all of this.

Joe, we've got a problem. What? Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at the DavidKnightShow.com, right? So basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because basically you can't hold coffee with your hands, right? I'm a scat in the, but anyone tries to mug me, I, I'm be ready for it. You, you dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we owe the world.

These people, they're supporting free speech with every month they buy. Come on. These people, I tell you, will anyway. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, there's an excellent article that I didn't get to last week, but it is still very, very timely. The FDA continues its infanticide by vaccine program, giving emergency use authorization for a fourth COVID vaccine for babies and toddlers under the age of five.

And I say this is very timely because this is still, they've given the approval, but it is still there. And I want you to tell you, pull that picture back up again. Focus in on that image there. And this is one of the most disturbing things i've seen in a long time it is a couple of babies there in diapers and there are diagrams with arrows saying well giving all the doses here's one way to give five doses in one visit and that baby, you know, stick two in the right leg, two in the left leg, and one in the arm. Injection sites should be separated by one inch.

IM injections are not recommended in an infant's arms. SC injections can also be given. And then underneath that, they've got another baby. One way to give seven doses if needed. And one visit. Why would they be needed? Well, because this is the protocol that's been put out by the CDC and the AMA. You've got to have X number of vaccines by such and such a date.

And so pull that back up again. Look at that. He's got two shots in the right arm, one shot in the left arm, and then two shots each in each leg. And it's just, it just makes me sick. I don't want to play for you again. You know, if we have this sudden adult death syndrome. You know, if you start to kill people with your vaccine immediately and look the other way and tell people there's no issues here, they start to put two and two together and they start to get vaccine hesitant about all the vaccines, you know, not just all these Trump shots, but about the things that they've been using to kill babies for many years,

calling it sudden infant death syndrome, just as they're now calling it sudden adult death syndrome. Here's a mother who put two and two together. I played this clip for you before. It always bears repeating. You know, because something that's been going on for over 40 years just hit me. I had a child that died of SIDS in 1984. For people that don't know what SIDS is, it's called Sudden Infant Death Syndrome,

or crib death was another one. I've been saying this for 40 years, over 40 years. I don't understand this. He was just at the doctor's two weeks before. Got his shots. He had the perfect health. Everything was great and then last night i watched have you ever watched mrs g the medical exam examiner is it i can't say it now anyway i

watched her show and she says what's at rise right now is the adult, sudden adult syndrome. Same thing as SIDS, but it's for adults. What happened lately that was forced upon people that they had to have? And all of a sudden, the rise of these adults dying for no reason is happening? And then it dawned on me that I poisoned my kid two weeks before with a vaccine that I was told was safe. What if that's the cause of sudden infant death syndrome and they've been lying to us all this time

and they've been experimenting on our babies since 1984 and before and it's just come to light because we get more education now we can get reached education we're not just told whatever they want us to tell we can look research online what if that's the cause of sins what if me doing what i thought was good killed my baby and it's just hitting me right now because i never put two to two together until now yeah it's about time we put two and two together it's about time we put trump in that mix as well and reagan and fauci and all the rest of it was her child died in 1984 they knew that these vaccines were harming and killing children that's why fauci is the first thing he did and he did it with ronald reagan got legal immunity for childhood vaccines you see the uh what we're seeing happening here with the pandemic, that was a different kind of immunity.

That was put in by George W. Bush. Why are they doing all of this stuff with Republicans? That was put in by George W. Bush in 2005, the PrEP Act, saying, oh, we've got to rush everything with this pandemic stuff. And, of course, it was under George W. Bush that they did 9-11, that they did Dark Winter, that they put out the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act and all the rest of this stuff. Well, if we have to actually do this, according to our simulation games,

we need to give the pharmaceutical industry immunity on those types of vaccines as well. So the FDA has now amended the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine requiring a booster dose of the vaccine in children six months to four years of age, at least two months before completion of the primary vaccination. They said if a child misses a few vaccines or misses their well child appointment.

Yeah, don't take your child to the doctor if they're not sick. You'd be very careful when you take them if they are sick. As you can see from the image at the top of the article, as I showed you before, you have pediatricians who are trained to inject multiple shots into these kids in various places. And it is absolutely sickening. I mean, they treat them like some kind of a zombie voodoo doll, sticking pins everywhere. If the baby or the toddler dies after these injections, it'll be classified as sudden infant death syndrome, writes vaccineimpact.com.

And Brian Schohovey says this is infanticide by vaccination, a way of reducing the population. And it has been happening for a very long time. Unfortunately, they just ramped it up under Trump. And the first case, a six month old baby boy from Iowa was injected with seven doses of vaccines. Then died 10 days later. These are the things that in the VAERS database, you know, we talk about how

they, they escalate this thing, put it on steroids, Oh, look, this is more than we've had in 30 years combined, several times more reported into the VAERS database. But the VAERS database was there basically as a, well, you know, we're not going to hold the companies responsible for this, but we'll create a database so that we can look at this and make recommendations about how to make vaccines safer. And even before the COVID Trump shots rolled out, I was talking about this many times, Del Bigtree, RFK Jr., doing lawsuits to say, well, we would like to know what you've done over the last 30 years with all this information in the VAERS database.

What recommendations have you made for pharmaceutical companies to fix their vaccines? And they fought them and fought them, said, we're not going to give that to you. Lawsuit. They lost the lawsuit. And so finally they said, well, we don't have anything. We haven't done anything with VAERS database to make the vaccines safer. We don't care. And so here's some of the things that happen.

Six-month-old baby. Unexpected death. Taking a nap in the afternoon and found pulseless in the crib. After he's given seven doses of vaccines and then died 10 days later. SIDS, right? No, no. Sudden injection death is what it is. Sudden injection death.

You could change that acronym and that would apply to both adults and to infants. Sudden injection death. A two-year-old girl in New Hampshire. Death after receiving both COVID and annual influenza vaccines. Two years old. Not at risk from COVID. Not at, just amazing. Another one.

One-year-old baby boy from Florida. Increased body temperature, a, just amazing. Another one, one-year-old baby boy from Florida. Increased body temperature, seizure, then death after a single dose of the COVID shot. A two-year-old died

from a single Pfizer shot after six hours the same day. A two-year-old boy from Massachusetts, patient died in his sleep overnight. No answers given as to how or why he died.

It's sudden infant death syndrome. These kids are just fine, you know, until they go for their well-child visit. Some babies die because their mothers took a COVID shot while they were breastfeeding. And so some of that is in there as well. You know, they've just escalated this with a spike, but they've been killing babies with sudden injection death for a long time, even before the Trump shots. And then here's something else has been rolling around for a very long time. This is a lengthy report on, uh, children's health defense about fluoride and lower IQ.

And the interesting thing about this update, we've known this for a long time, and of course we've had studies from Harvard correlating fluoride levels in water to low IQ geographically. So we've known about this for quite some time, no question about it. But what is interesting about this is that this is coming from the U.S. government under one organization that is under HHS, the National Toxicology Program. They're under the Health and Human Services. They're under Javier Becerra. And they put this together over several years. And then Health and Human Services blocked it. And so people sued, and now we have some information about it.

And we also knew who was the one who was pushing to block it the most the department of health and human services and the cdc initially blocked this report from the government's national toxicology program they blocked it from release but a court order stemming from a lawsuit going back several years, uh, filed by the food and water watch against the U S EPA. So you got the HHS, you got CDC, you got EPA, all these just, you know, everybody,

I guess, except for the FDA is involved in this particular one, but all these people who are supposed to be looking out for health, the EPA, uh, you know, watchdogs about chemicals. Yeah, you saw what happened in Ohio, right?

Big watchdogs for our safety, aren't they? The EPA. But they're trying to block this information. Just like they're telling them, it's okay, go back into Palestine, Ohio, it's no problem. The NTP is an interagency program run by HHS that researches and reports on environmental toxins. They conducted a six-year systematic review to assess scientific studies on fluoride exposure. There's a lot of them.

It's not just a Harvard study. There's studies all over the place. And they all come up with the same conclusion. And potential neurodevelopmental and cognitive health effects in humans. As a matter of fact, they did a meta-analysis of these different studies. Of the 19 studies that they looked at, 18 of them correlated fluoride exposure to significant decreases in IQ. Our meta-analysis confirms results of previous meta-analyses and extends them by including newer, more precise studies with individual level exposure measures, they said. The data support a consistent inverse association between fluoride exposure and children's IQ. Inverse association

means that as one goes up, the other goes down. The results were robust to stratification by risk of bias, gender, age group, study location, exposure timing, exposure type. These findings fly in the face of the empty unscientific claims U.S. health officials have propagated for years, said RFK Jr., namely that water fluoridation is safe and beneficial. It's past time to eliminate this neurotoxin from our water supply so this is the interesting thing about fluoridation into the water supply to me has always been dosage you know the difference between a medicine and dosage or medicine and poison rather is dos. Just as the difference between water and death from too much water is the quantity. When I talk about this, I usually talk about the radio station that is a gag.

Had some contestants and they had to drink water and not go to the bathroom. And I forget, you know, it was something I gave had to answer questions or whatever, who could go the longest. And they had a woman who died from drinking too much water. I diluted her blood so much that she died. Even something that is harmless, even something that is beneficial can become toxic based on dosage. So how do you control the dosage when you dump it into the water supply?

If these people, these dentists and other people pushing this stuff, if fluoride were beneficial, then they should give people fluoride pills or have them brush it on their teeth or something like that. That would even make more sense than having people ingest it. But of course, it has negative effects. It doesn't strengthen your teeth or your bones. It actually has a deleterious effects. Fluorescence, fluorosis is one of the things that comes from it. But the idea that you would dump this into the water, even if it were uniformly distributed, and I don't know how that happens, but let's assume that you dump this into the water.

So do you put a dose in there for an adult male that's 200 pounds, or do you put a dose in there for a baby that is 20 pounds, right? What dosage do you put in there when you're putting this? Do you skew this for adult males or for babies? It's absolute nonsense, of course. And we know how this all began, too. If you go back in the history and look at it, and they don't go into this in this article from Children's Health Defense, but if you go back and look at the history,

when did we start fluoridating the water? We started when the aluminum industry and the nuclear industry had some toxic waste, some isotopes of fluoride that they wanted to get rid of. They would have had to pay a lot of money to dispose of it as a toxic waste, or they could sell it as beneficial and have cities pay them. Which would they rather do? Would they try to dispose of this as a toxic waste? Or would they like to sell it for a lot of money?

It's past time to eliminate this neurotoxin from the water supply, says RFK Jr. And he's right. We had to fight hard to have this report even made public, said the plaintiff's attorney, Connett. He said the CDC and the HHS buried this. If they had gotten their way, this report would have never seen the light of day. And, of course, they're joined by groups like the American Dental Association. They're not going to be so obvious that they have the nuclear industry and the aluminum industry come together and promote this. No, they'll do it through the dentists and they'll figure out how to, you know, pad everybody's

bank accounts. So when you look at who stonewalled this, it's kind of interesting. It was stonewalled by Rachel Levine, actually Richard Levine, right? The cross-dressing deputy HHS director. He was the one who took point on this. This woman of the year, right? Did this. Because he doesn't care anything more about babies

than he does about young children that they want to mutilate. The current bodies of experimental animal studies and human mechanistic evidence do not provide clarity on the association between fluoride exposure and cognitive or neurodevelopmental human health effects. That was the conclusion that they forced, the concluding statement that they forced

on the National Toxicology Project, and yet Children's Health Defense says, yet this report's summary that I just read you contradicts the rest of the entire report. Because nearly all studies examined for this literature review found evidence of cognitive or developmental issues associated with fluoride. 18 of the 19 studies that they looked at, and so then they put a, you know, and they go through them one by one in the body of it,

and then the conclusion says, yeah, there's nothing to see here. Nothing to see here. Of the 19 high-quality studies, 18 reported an association between higher fluoride exposure and lower IQ in children. 46 of the 53 low-quality studies also found evidence of that association. The body of evidence provides low confidence that fluoride exposure

is associated with adverse effects on adult cognition. But there is, however, a large body of evidence on IQ effects in children. That's what was in the body of the report. So I say, you know, the fluoride that's there, once you're an adult, doesn't seem to have an effect. But if you're a child, a big effect. If they're using tap water with fluoride in it to mix baby formula, that's going to have a big effect on the baby's IQ. The monograph and the meta-analysis found that fluoride exposure at levels equivalent to 1.5 mg per liter is associated with lower IQ in children.

Well, again, how do we control this dosage? How do you know what the dosage is? Who sets that level? And is that going to be a uniform distribution? When you add fluoride to the water, is it going to be a uniform distribution when you add fluoride to the water? Is it going to be uniformly distributed? Not clear to me. They said levels of fluoride found in drinking water in the U.S. are typically half of that level that is neurotoxic, 1.5 milligrams per liter. And so on that basis, HHS's review of the report recommended that they revise their assessment and say, well, this is not a problem.

The NTP responded in the emails that they've obtained, we do not agree with this comment. Our assessment considers fluoride exposure from all sources, not just water. It's found in certain foods. It's found in just water. It's found in certain foods. It's found in dental products. It's found in some pharmaceuticals. It's found in other sources like tea and so forth. And so the water component is just part of it. And if you're going to get it up,

you're going to raise the base level there in the water for no reason. Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the dentist or whoever is pushing this to show that it's effective? But again, same. See, this is why it was so obvious to anybody who had been looking at fluoride or childhood vaccines before this Trump stuff. And it's why Trump knew it as well. He knew about all this stuff. What did he do?

He used his knowledge of autism and vaccine injury, and he used RFK Jr. to make money. He thought, well, I might have to do something about this. So millions of dollars given to the Trump campaign, and voila, we've got a CEO executive put in, Alex Azar, CEO of Eli Lilly, put in as head of HHS. That's how Trump rolls. That's how Trump betrays us. So again, people consume large amounts of fluoride through tea and other drinks.

Processed foods are made with fluoridated water, not to mention pesticide injection and even fluoride from air pollution. Fluorid exposure can depend on how much water they drink. He said, think about this. Your level of risk depends incredibly on how thirsty you are. And that's how absurd this entire premise of water fluoridation is. Individual exposure levels, as documented by repeated urinary measurements, suggest widely varying total exposures from water combined with fluoride from other sources.

And so they interpret this data by saying, well, look at how widely, if we actually look at what is coming out, we look at urinary samples to get the total picture, we see it varying quite a bit. And they say, well, it's varying quite a bit because people have different sources of fluoride, foods that they eat, what they drink, things like that. But it may also be that baseline variation that is just dumped into the water supply.

And so when you look at the EPA's role in this, they previously had a risk assessment for other chemicals, such as methylene chloride or bromopropane. And they looked at this and they said, well, we're going to set the level of allowed exposure to this that's going to be well below the toxic level. In other words, and it is usually in the range of 10 to 20 times less than what they think people are going to be exposed to. So they leave a lot of margin there. So here's what we have determined is toxic.

And we're going to set the legal limit as one-tenth or one-twentieth of that level. But not when it comes to fluoride. And the EPA didn't want to do anything with that, right? At the very least, if they only consider the source being what they put into the water, they're taking it down by a factor of two, not a factor of 10, not a factor of 20. And so they said, research on other neurotoxicants has shown that subtle shifts in IQ at the population level can have a profound impact on the number of people who fall within the high and low ranges in the population's IQ distribution. For example, a five-point decrease in a population's

IQ would nearly double the number of people classified as intellectually disabled. This is another way that they're deliberately killing us, depopulating and deliberately dumbing us down. It's not just the educational system, as Charlotte Iserby said, you know, in her book, Deliberate Dumbing Down of America. They're doing that in the educational system, but they're doing it even with the water. In 2016, a group of six nonprofit organizations and several individuals questioned or petitioned

the EPA to end fluoridation of drinking water in the U.S. But you know, just like we see with the railroad thing, if there's a company making profits off of this, or if it's going to hurt a company, we don't really want to get involved, says the EPA. In that regard, they're just like the FDA, the other watchdog that is out there for our stuff. And as I said before, the poster child for all of this was Rachel, also known as, you know, his real name is Richard Levine,

Richard Levine, the woman of the year, got involved the May 18th release date for the report, they said is certainly, most certainly not going to happen. That was last year, May 11th. They had insiders tipping it off, saying that Richard Levine was going to shut this thing down. It was only because we were tipped off by someone with knowledge of the inside that something was amiss that we went and did extensive FOIA requests.

And we're able to get documents showing that the NTP scientists, the national toxicology project, uh, considered this report to be complete and ready for publication last May, May of 2022. They said it was clear though, that the agencies are blocking the release. This is a clear case of stonewalling.

After over six years of research, numerous outside peer reviews, they completed their state of the science report. And we have emails to show that Levine, or Levine, or whatever, is the one who put it on hold. Rachel, I mean Richard Levine, said not to publish this report at this time. Then we got the FOIA emails showing that, and NTP said that they may not publish this report at all. They may not publish it in the final form, but we did get them to agree to at least post a draft report, and they will consider it to be a draft report.

It's all politics. It has absolutely nothing to do with science or safety or efficacy, any of this stuff. It's pure politics. And over again, over and over again, whether we see the vaccines, whether we see what happened in Palestine, Ohio, or whether we look at fluoridation of the water, there is a pattern of behavior, isn't there?

They will poison us. They will kill us to serve their corporate masters. There is no investment like a politician. The return on investment from a politician is just astronomical. Unfortunately, fluoridation promoters and high-level government officials have continued to label it as a draft, but it was not a draft. Yeah, they will poison you for profit. That is an established pattern of behavior by our government. We'll be right back. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track

and control us. Their commons project to to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. well we had the swiss banks what credit swissbig-to-fail version of all of this, has failed. And they were, I think, the second largest bank in Switzerland, the biggest bank, UBS. They're now working with the Central Bank of Switzerland to have them take over the deposits.

But all is not well. Pensioners don't seem to come out on top like Silicon Valley elitist military industrial complex does. So the seniors' pension funds are being raided there. This is a story by Brian Schilhavi, Health Impact News. Credit Suisse, which was the second largest bank in Switzerland, considered to be a too-big-to-fail bank, has now failed. Swiss authorities rushed through a deal late Sunday in an attempt to prevent a wholesale stock market crash before trading started in Asia. UPI this morning, just before the show began, said that the situation with Credit Suisse has, quote,

sends shutters throughout the markets. That was this morning. Bank stocks primarily. The deal involved a forced fire sale to its rival bank, UBS, the largest bank in Switzerland, with a bail-in of a particular kind of bond, the AT1 bonds, which were introduced in Europe after the global financial crisis back in 2008. Those bonds back in 2008 were introduced to serve as shock absorbers when banks start to fail.

Designed to impose permanent losses on bondholders or to be converted into equity. If a bank's capital ratios fall below a predetermined level. And, uh, that's a person commenting on this as we're confident that Swiss pensions will be delighted that they're getting nothing, zero, a donut while the Saudis,

uh, recover their, their money, right? Saudis had a lot of money and credit Swiss. They pulled it out, made themselves whole. Uh, but the pension funds are going to take it on the chin here. Uh, so the Swiss national bank is offering a massive buy-in, but these bonds will be bailed in and written down to zero.

This wipeout, oh, sorry, they said, pardon me, a bail-in, is the biggest loss yet for Europe's $275 billion AT1 bond market. Again, supposedly shock absorbers. Well, i guess there are some people who are in shock now over this could we see similar types of bail-ins and pension funds disappear in the u.s that's brian shulhavi well here's what black rock ceo larry fink says he says retirement is a quote silent crisis, facing the global economy. We have an aging population because of all the birth control, all the abortion, all of the propaganda telling people you don't want to have children, right? So with physiological things that they have done into the food supply, the water supply, and all the rest of the stuff, and the vaccinations.

I mean, there is a physical component. You can actually see a plummeting of, uh, uh, you know, what they call spermicide down 60%, right? But it's also a societal issue. We denigrate children. We denigrate motherhood, parenthood, right? Uh, everything has been done to destroy the idea that we have children. And so now we have a demographic issue, aging population, nobody to support them.

All these pension funds, just like Social Security, were always set up as a Ponzi scheme. As a matter of fact, when the first one was introduced in Germany by Bismarck, they picked the retirement age of 65 because that was life expectancy. It was always a lie. They didn't anticipate that you would get it. And it's one of the reasons why they keep raising the pension level. All of the violence and fires and protests and everything in France's kind of interesting because Macron arbitrarily raised that by himself, and it went from 62 to 64. And so still less than most pension plans, retirement plans.

But again, where is this going to be paid? Well, Larry Fink, BlackRock CEO, says it is a silent crisis and it is global because of the depopulation moves that have happened globally. Larry Fink said some of the issues driving the retirement crisis include populations in Europe, North America, China, Japan, aging due to increased lifespans and falling birth rates. In the U.S., for example, 10,000 people turn 65 every day. That sounds like Groundhog Day. Every day you turn 65.

UBS seeks $6 billion government backstop as it rushes to finalize the takeover. And they say 10,000 jobs may have to be cut if the two banks combine. It's always 10,000. 10,000 people turn 65 every day. 10,000 people getting fired by Credit Suisse as they put all this together. And as Zero Hedge comments, so much change in just 48 hours, late on Thursday, just hours after the Swiss National Bank had launched the first of many bailout attempts of Credit Suisse,

Bloomberg blasted the following headline, UBS Credit Suisse said to oppose the idea of a forced combination. And now they seem to have this happy shotgun marriage that has been arranged for them. And as we look at elsewhere, here in the United States, the big focus has been on keeping First Republic Bank open at all costs you had um 11 i think it was big banks so the biggest banks uh coming in at three different tiers some of them put in five billion dollars some of them put in two and a half some of them chipped in a billion and they came up with i think the total was like 30 billion dollars but you know bank of america was one of the ones in the $5 billion tier, and they had made $15 billion,

and people transferring money from small and medium-sized banks into Bank of America. Well, they're too big to fail. I'm not sure about the bank that I'm with right now. And so they're putting this in there to backstop First Republic Bank. Even with that, First Republic Bank stock was down 60% last time I looked. But of course, there's so much volatility, who knows if it's gone up or down. And the question is, the question remains, why? Why? Why is First Republic that was in worse shape than two, possibly three of these big banks that were shut down? Much worse than Silvergate shut down. Was it voluntary? Did somebody hold a gun to their head and say, you know what? You got too much crypto here.

We can make this, we can go difficult with this or we can go easy with this. Right now you got money. We can make sure that doesn't, you don't leave with any money either. That's what I think happened. And as I said last week, when you look at this banking collapse, Silvergate is a building seven. It's the one that is really suspicious. But a lot of people are now looking at the health of even Signature Bank,

saying they didn't have to shut down either. A top audit firm defends giving a clean bill of health to Silicon Valley Bank and to Signature Bank weeks before their failure. And again, Silvergate did not fail. It was shut down voluntarily you know like you volunteer to get a vaccine they have ways to coerce people don't they and so let's look at how all of this plays into the cbdc narrative uh when we look at what is moving on, we've got a lot of apocalyptic headlines throughout the media. And when I say the media,

I say conservative media, alternative media, crypto media, Western governments are on the verge of introducing expiring money. This is from reclaim the net. A key central bank is considering implementing negative interest rates as it rolls out its digital currency. This is just one of the many heinous things about CBDC. It's not just telling you what you can buy, where you can buy it, when you can buy it, so forth. How much you

can consume, control, and watching everything that you do and implementing a way to choke off anything they don't want you to have or to choke any individual out of the financial system. That's one aspect of it. But this is focused on the way that it could be used to control the economy. It's one of the reasons why the central bankers love it so much. It's just something for everybody, right? The little petty tyrants get to tell you what you can and cannot have because of the green agenda.

And the central bankers have another tool that they can manipulate wealth and make themselves more powerful and more wealthy. The European Central Bank is considering using negative interest rates, a tool that erodes the value of your money and to use it through CBDC. The executive director of the Digital Euro Association. It's a think tank. But think of the initials there. DEA.

Just like the Drug Enforcement Agency, right? It'll be a prohibition. A prohibition of cash and other things like that. The DEA, the Digital Euro Association. So the ECB, the European Central Bank, wants to keep the possibility open for, quote, tiered remuneration. Tiered remuneration. What does that mean? Measures that incentivize or disincentivize people to hold more or less CBDCs. She added one of those is negative interest rates.

And so negative interest rates would allow the central banks to choose a rate at which your money expires and to punish those who save their money. It's like the tax code on steroids, right? money expires and to punish those who save their money. Yeah. It's like the tax code on steroids, right? Yeah. You get punished if you save money. It doesn't really matter. The punishment has gone away because the interest that they pay on accounts has gone away.

I've talked about that many times. You go back and you look when America wasn't, uh, run by a criminal cartel. Um, well, not to the extent that it is today, go back and look at the 1960s and you look, um, I, and I, I looked at this when somebody said, um, when, when interest rates went up and they were hovering around 5% and they said, uh, yeah, this is, um, that's not a big problem. You know, it was interest rates are about 5% in the 1960s, and people were making moves to the suburbs,

and it was the American dream and all this stuff. But, you know, the interesting thing is that in the 1960s, when the home mortgage rate was around 5%, the rate that they would pay you on your savings in the bank was around 4%. And it was a teeny tiny fraction, less than 1%, that they would pay you now on average, right? It was like a third or a tenth or one twentieth of a percent that they would pay you while they're charging you 5% interest rate,

like they did in the 1960s. So that's one aspect of it. But now, you know, you could have saved money, so they made it, you know, they penalized people who saved money. They didn't reward savings. They taxed them. They would reward you if you spent money, if you borrowed money and paid interest on your credit card, you know,

because that incentivizes people to make the bankers rich. And then they took that away under Trump, along with other things. But under this, they would do things, they would go very punitive. They might put in a negative interest rate, they said, of maybe 10%. So you lose 10% of your money every year. But from the very beginning of this, you had central bankers. I remember the central bankers meeting in the UK, where one of them said, you know, of this, you had central bankers. I remember the central bankers meeting in the UK where one of them said, you know, with this, um, we could put a time limit on money. We say,

here's some free money from the government. And we do that to get people to start getting used to holding CBDC. And so, Hey, you know, you don't want CBDC. You mean you don't want this free money? Here's some free money. I'll give it to you. But you got to spend it within a certain period of time. You don't spend it within a year, it all disappears. All of it.

Not just a negative interest rate, but it would just, you know, this expires on such and such a date and it's gone, 100% gone. And so that's another part of it. Negative interest rates, money that expires at a particular date. Jared Kushner loved that idea. He sent articles about that to Steve Mnuchin, the Goldman Sachs banker that Trump had put in charge of the Treasury Department. So yeah, disappearing 100%.

But they can also use it with the negative interest rates to control the economy. Governments and globalist institutions, such as the World Bank, are big fans of negative interest rates and expiring money because they see it as a monetary policy tool that can make money costly to hold.

And we therefore pressure people to spend it quickly. That's one of the things that they, one's one of the reasons when they measure it, they measure the velocity of money. How quickly is it turning over and things like that? ECB has previously proposed having spending limits on the digital euro. The Bank of England wants the power to decide what people spend their CBDCs on, and the World Bank wants to be able to ban certain people from having any access to the financial system. The World Bank does. And so when you go back and you look at Representative Tom Emmer, who is the GOP House Majority Whip, he's the guy who whips everybody in line on an agenda,

and he's good on this. He knows exactly what the problem is. That's key for politicians. They have to make a connection with you. They have to identify what the problem is. Trump's doing a good job of identifying problems. He just doesn't ever do anything to stop, to help them. Actually, he jumps in and makes it worse when he's president. But, you know, a politician running for office or whatever understands what that is.

And Emmer can get the Republicans to push back on CBDC. That'll be good from a standpoint that people understand what the danger is and create a bigger movement. However, it's not going to go anywhere because even if it passes in the Senate, it will be shut down by Biden in a veto. But what he put in the bill was two things. We're talking about the negative interest rates,

the idea that they'd use the CBDCs as a monetary policy tool. And Emmer says, well, you're not going to use it for monetary policy. And you're not going to use it to go directly to the customers. See, FedNow is going to be the wholesale side of this. And so what Fed now is being sold, the thing that's going to roll out in July, that's being sold as something that, you know, a way to do instant payment transfers 24, seven, three 65. But of course you always already have a lot of apps that are out there that do that.

Venmo, where I've been banned from access to that financial system. Venmo does that. Cash app does that. People send contributions to cash app. Zelle currently does that. And there's many, many more. But this is not any new function that is being added by the Federal Reserve. What this is, is step number one to a CBDC that goes directly to the consumers. Because people will say, well, you know, you've been using the Federal Reserve to transfer money directly. That's what FedNow is. So why wouldn't you take a Fed coin? Besides, don't you want to

put your money in a CBDC? You don't have to worry about a bank run if you do because there's no banks involved. And if everybody puts their money in the Fed coin, there will be no banks. And so you won't have to worry about bank runs and all the rest of this stuff. And, you know, the Federal Reserve is too big to fail. It is the mother of all too big to fail. It is the mother of all too-big-to-fail banks, right? Deutsche Bank and the World Economic Forfeiture Foreclosure Group look toward the end of cash.

And you have a Deutsche Bank strategist saying that CBDCs are, quote, inevitable. He has penned a write-up for the WEF, or Davos, that focuses on some of the Switzerland-based informal group's favorite talking and policy points, CBDC, and the ultimate demise of cash and thereby financial privacy. He singles out Sweden, Brazil, and China as countries that have made particular strides in moving toward digitized versions of central bank currencies.

And he credits the pandemic, the Trump-supported pandemic. He credits the Trump-supported pandemic with expediting matters on this front, particularly in Sweden. The article mentions that 90% of central banks around the world are now in the process of creating and or in a stage of running trials for CBDCs, and that number has doubled in just one year. He also picks an interesting angle in order to sell CBDCs. He says, well, it keeps you safer physically.

Does it? Really? People can't rob you if you physically mug you for that? You don't think so? You don't think that you're going to have gangs that are going to shove you over into a corner, say, take out your phone and transfer this money to me or whatever. Right.

Um, maybe that won't happen because they'd be able to trace the cash. But of course the muggings are typically going to be happening with hackers, right? That's going to be the easy way. But, but the nice thing is they can steal your money and not beat you over the head. That's an improvement. That's a feature, right? It seems that the pandemic was not the only force driving Sweden to be turning away from cash.

You had one of the singers from ABBA. ABBA. I couldn't believe it. Bjorn Ulveius. I don't know these four people. I do everything I could to avoid their music. It's when I'd listen to radio, I would have multiple stations queued up. And as soon as it came on, it's like punch out another station.

But this guy whose music we can't escape apparently believes the presence of cash is the reason that homes get burgled. He said his own son had burglars, and so he became anti-cash. Well, maybe the reason they burgled your son was because, like you, he's filthy rich off of your garbage music. You know, I had my home invaded, so I just sold my home, and I live on the street now. People can't home invade me. It's great. That's right. Yeah. You just sit on the sidewalk and listen to the dancing queen or whatever that, according to a 2020 survey in Sweden,

they said between 2010 and 2020, even before this pandemic happened, the proportion of people in Sweden who used cash fell from 40% to less than 10%. In Norway, as I've reported before, it's down three or 4%. And most of the banks won't even give you cash. It's one of the reasons why there is now going to be a referendum in Switzerland to require the government to make cash available for people. We'll have to see if that passes or not. And China, decreased circulation of money went from 8.2% of GDP from 11% in 2012. It went to 8.2% in 2022,

falling but not as quickly. Despite the trend toward a cashless society and CBDC's progression, the bank official warns the end of cash is still far in sight and will be still used as a store of value and a means for payment for some time. And we need to, you know,

Catherine Austin Fitz says, you know, let's make Friday cash day. Try to pay for everything in cash on Friday to try to keep this going. Because if we don't use cash, you're going to have merchants who are going to increasingly not use it. When I spoke to the Tennessee Committee on Commerce about CBDCs and local banks, one of the guys there in the question and answer period said, I just had an experience where I went to a restaurant

that had valet parking, and he said, they wouldn't take credit card, they wouldn't take credit card they wouldn't take cash they wouldn't take anything you had except for one particular app and you had to have that app on your phone in order to be able to pay for parking and that's that's the way this is headed if we don't use cash right uh we need to use cash and um if we use it um you know the the uh people at retail level will perhaps still uh keep that there they'll say well there's enough people that will still use cash otherwise they may just dry up in terms of not allowing you to use it cash and decentralized crypto remain the only way for people to have full control over their assets and preserve their privacy. Well, also gold, gold and silver, right?

You know, when you talk about crypto, talk about decentralized crypto, the proof of work crypto, the private crypto, because the CBDC crypto is proof of stake. This is worth this because we say it's worth it. It's worth this because it's coming from the central. It's just the fiat system. And that was the whole thing about all the other cryptos as they're based on the mining, based on proof of work. But you know, they're not really set up at the point right now where people are really using it for purchases um as as cash as a cash substitute and so anyway that gold is really not set up or silver is really not set up to do that but they're capable of doing it we've seen throughout the history of civilization that gold and silver were used that way. They were always real money. And so they could easily be used that way again,

even though it's not being done right now with the collapse of the financial system, it would be done. And the same thing would be done with crypto as well. By the way, I'll just put in a plug here for Tony, Tony Arterburn wise wolf dot gold. And of course you can get there through the portal that he set up for us, davidknight.gold. We'll take you to Tony.

There is some news on gold, too. It's going pretty strong right now as people are starting to get concerned about it. So the price has gone up. I don't know what the latest ticker price on it is. Anyway, this crisis will define the future of money, says Coindesk.com. With the U.S. Federal Reserve creating a new backstop facility reportedly worth $2 trillion,

and Switzerland's central bank bailing out Credit Suisse to the tune of $54 billion, the echoes of crises in 2008 and 2013 are loud. And let me just say this, you know, and I've mentioned this before, in fall of 2019, when you had the repo market, that's the overnight exchange market for banks and the Federal Reserve and stuff, and there was problems with that, the Federal Reserve started dumping money into that. And I started looking at these massive amounts and said, whoa, that's equivalent to the, you know, how does that stack up to other countries? Because other countries, you know, we talk about trillions.

Other countries are talking about billions. And so one day they put in an amount that was equivalent to the entire gross domestic product of Puerto Rico. And then another day they put in what was equivalent to the gross domestic product for the entire year of Switzerland in a single day. That's why, you know, the U.S. Federal Reserve is talking about $2 trillion backstop. And Switzerland had a lot of maneuvering and everything to do to put in a $54 billion. So that's like, you know, $2,000 versus $54. That's what we're talking about. You know, get rid of some of those zeros so you understand what's going on.

$54 versus $2,000. And so the some of those zeros so you understand what's going on. 54 versus 2,000. And so the scale of everything is much bigger in the United States. But same idea, really. And as I said before, if they want to protect the market, what was happening in California was protecting their military industrial complex partners and their elite friends and their political contributors and all the rest of this stuff. But I said, since we're operating under a fiat currency, and since these people believe in modern monetary theory, magic money tree,

there's no limit to the amount of money they'll pour into it. They could put tens of trillions of dollars in. They will federalize the entire financial system, but they could pony up that stuff because it's just credits. They don't even have to physically print it anymore. So when you look at what is happening with crypto, CoinDesk says we're looking at the future of money. We are at a juncture of crisis

right crisis and I love the analogy it was I think it was it was Doug Casey he had an investment newsletter called crisis investigate investing and up at the top of it you'd show the Chinese figure for crisis. And you know, they're pictographs. And a lot of times they're combinations of a lot of different symbols. And the Chinese symbol for crisis was danger and opportunity combined into one thing. That really is where we are. We're in a financial crisis. It is danger. It is opportunity. It is about the future of money. And so from the perspective of CoinDesk, looking at what is happening with crypto, they get it. They understand that this is a crypto choke point, these financial closings. embedded into public consciousness negatively, mostly thanks to Elizabeth Warren.

Thanks to their, uh, FTX, Sam bank, man fried, uh, the industry faces as biggest ever test. One that involves an intensified struggle with a financial establishment.

And when they mean the industry, they mean the crypto industry. Uh, the community now has a narrow opportunity to seize the day and to define the future of money recall the bitcoin blockchain was born out of chaos in the 2008 financial crisis and um the person who supposedly put this in sat Satoshi Nakamoto, whoever or whatever, or whatever group that is or individual it is, the immortal timestamp on January 3rd, 2009,

inscribing a headline from that day's London Times, quote, Chancellor on the brink of a second bailout for banks. And that was the UK's finance minister. That crisis highlighted how our dependence on banks to run the plumbing of our money and our payments leaves the entire economy vulnerable to mismatches in banks, investments, and liabilities. They exploited their too-big-to-fail status. And now with the collapse of these three high-profile banks, hundreds of regional banks are facing worrying outflows.

And the Federal Reserve has created a new backstop facility reportedly worth $2 trillion. And as I said, the echoes of that 2008 crisis are loud. He says, Bitcoin's raise on debt has always been that in removing intermediaries from payments and hard-coding monetary policy into predictable issuance schedule, it offers an alternative to the centralized model of fiat sovereign currency run by central banks in coordination with private banks

and so mitigates the entrenched vulnerabilities exposed this last week. At first blush, however, the news hasn't been good for Bitcoin and the rest of the crypto community. First thing they talk about is Silvergate again, the building seven of this banking collapse that we saw last week. It was brought down in part by its heavy exposure to failing crypto firms. But it was not a failed bank. It was solvent. There wasn't a dime of money that came out of the FDIC or the federal government or anything

else to pay off depositors. They had everybody's money. They voluntarily shut down. Why? Was it a pressure campaign? I believe it was. But they talk then about signatures closing. They don't get into the solvency of Silvergate that much.

They focus more on Signature Bank. And that also raises some questions. As we said last week, Signature Bank was in much better shape than First Republic, and they're doing everything they can to keep First Republic from closing. But they wanted Signature to shut down because of its connection to crypto. Although the New York Department of Financial Services said that Signature's closure had nothing to do with crypto and was instead triggered by a crisis of confidence in its leadership. Oh, really? A crisis of confidence in its leadership. Oh, really? A crisis of confidence in its leadership.

I read you last week the sequence of events that have been happening, how the Federal Reserve has prohibited, how it has threatened banks about crypto, how it has kept banks that want to do crypto, kept them from, or organizations that wanted to do crypto, kept them from becoming banks. It's pretty clear when you look at it over a two-month period, how this has really escalated and how this is political policy and how this is being pushed out to the banks. People are scratching their heads over why a supposedly solvent bank

like Signature Bank was shut down. And Barney Frank, who was on the board, said that in an interview with New York Magazine, said the New York financial regulator had made the bank, quote, a poster child to tell people to stay away from crypto. And again, even more so with Silvergate. Much better financial situation than even Signature. Reuters reported that FDIC is insisting that any prospective buyer

will have to give up on Signature's crypto business. And then the New York regulator subsequently denied that. But I think that is true. Reuters thinks it is true. Blacklisting a legal industry in this way is an abuse of power. And of course, all these choke points, whether they are applied against gun retailers, whether they are applied against crypto, whether they are applied against speech, free speech, it is all an abuse of power.

Meanwhile, stablecoins are vital to fiat to crypto exchange operations. They've been caught up in this. The closure of Signature Bank has meant that Circle, remember they had $3.3 billion in Silicon Valley Bank. And I think that was what that was about. Silicon Valley Bank was not heavy into it, but Circle was. And Circle had gotten very large. And I think that was what that was about. Silicon Valley Bank was not heavy into it, but Circle was. And Circle had gotten very large. They were large enough that they said, well, even if we lose our $3.3 billion in SVB,

we will still be able to back this up. I think they had cash reserves of like $40 billion or something like that. But they'll no longer be able to use a 24-7 signet dollar clearing system for redemptions. And they'll be forced to rely on the time-bound services of Wall Street behemoth Bank of New York Mellon. So they have a New York banking regulator

that shuts this down. Bank of New York Mellon is one of the banks. They bought in at the least tier, the $1 billion tier, to backstop First Republic. But they said still, as an angel investor and newsletter author,

Tatiana Kaufman wrote, Bitcoin is made for this moment. If people continue to lose confidence in banks' ability to keep their money safe, the narrative around Bitcoin's self custody model will only get stronger self custody again, even the problem with all the cryptos problem with the Bitcoin is that if it is a, an attack on the infrastructure, if the grid goes down, the power grid goes

down, or if the internet goes down, any of that stuff goes down. You're going to be able to use crypto? It's not clear to me that you can. I don't think that you can if the internet is down. I don't know. Maybe some private wallets. Maybe it works. I don't know.

There's too much that I don't understand about Bitcoin. I appreciate any kind of system that is going to get power away from the central banks. That's one of the reasons why I support what Senator Frank Nicely is trying to do in Tennessee and some other senators are trying to do it in some other states as well. And that is to set up a publicly owned state bank. He calls it the Tennessee Reserve System. And if we have these other things that are out there, you know, Bitcoin or state banks. I call it the Tennessee Reserve Bank because a lot of the small and medium-sized banks think that's going to be competition to them.

No, it's not going to be competition. It's going to be their only lifeline. The competition to them is coming from the Federal Reserve and the CBDC. So many of these bankers don't even understand what's going on. I'll never forget when I had, we had a Bible study that was going on, but, you know, we were friends and we would talk about politics and stuff afterwards back in North Carolina. And one of the guys that was there knew my politics. He knew how much I disliked the Federal Reserve. And he had introduced me to his brother who came one time for a party. It wasn't a Bible study.

He's a vice president at a bank. Well, that's just a branch manager for the most part. It's been my experience. And that's what he was. And he says, David thinks that the Federal Reserve controls the economy.

I was like, yeah. I think everybody thinks that i think all the financial public but his brother who was vice president of a bank being a you know branch manager or something his brother said the federal reserve doesn't do anything they just clear checks that's all they do because that's all he saw you know he sent stuff to them to clear checks, but he had no idea that the Federal Reserve, I guess, how could he not understand the Federal Reserve sets interest rates? How could he not understand they set the monetary supply

and all the rest of these things that they do? Had no clue about any of that stuff. And that's the problem. You have these small, medium-sized banks, and he was just a branch manager, but a lot of the people. You have these small, medium-sized banks, and he was just a branch manager, but a lot of the people that are making these decisions, they don't understand that CBDC is coming for them. They don't see the red lights on their chest from the snipers out there.

And they don't understand that the only shield that they could possibly have would be the best shield they could have would be, um, you know, state bank. And again, I'm not a big fan of the banking industry in general, but I just got to say that anything that we can do to take power away from this, to decentralize power, to decentralize the financial system is good. That's why I support Bitcoin. I'm not interested in it personally that much, but, um, because of the vulnerabilities, the twin vulnerabilities of the internet and the power grid, not to mention all the security issues that are waiting there for people who don't understand how to keep it secure.

That's why I like gold. You physically hold it. It's simple for stupid people like me. A multifaceted clash of power that'll compel governments to accelerate the implementation of new regulatory framework for the coming era. I think I meant E-R-R-O-R of digital money. The argument will grow for requiring stable coin issuers to hold banking licenses with access to the Fed's discount window rather than storing their reserves at third-party traditional banks.

And if you look at that timeline that I put for the last couple of months, that's very clear. The Fed and the Federal Reserve and the federal government are threatening banks, don't do crypto, don't do any of this stuff. And so the banks are getting the message now. Oh, well, okay. I should not be doing business with anybody over crypto. This is what Wyoming-based Custodia Bank applied to do.

They said, all right, well, we got tens of billions of dollars here. We'd like to be a bank and deal directly with the Federal Reserve instead of having to go through a bank like Signature Bank or a bank like Silvergate. They're closing those banks down. They're threatening those banks down. And so when Custodia says, well, we'd like to deal directly with the Federal Reserve and be considered to be a bank like Silvergate. They're closing those banks down. They're threatening those banks down. And so when Custodia says, well, we'd like to deal directly with the Federal Reserve and be considered to be a bank, they drug this out for years.

And then just within the last couple of months, just within January, February, March, actually just within January, February, Federal Reserve said application denied. They appealed it. They denied the appeal. We're not going to let you be a bank. We're not going to let you be a bank. We're not going to let any crypto be done. And so Circle 2 has long expressed a goal to become a bank. But no, this is a political calculation to force people into CBDC.

But they go on to say, this is a time at which money is, we're going to have a definition of money. If this model is endorsed, how will traditional banks respond? They're not going to want these new crypto players poaching their depositors and competition. A super cheap source of financing whose departure could provoke an even bigger crisis. So the Federal Reserve doesn't want Custodia or Circle to become banks and to be able to take people's money and convert it into crypto. And the banks are scared to death to have them run it through them. So people could just exit their national currency altogether and put their savings in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or things like gold and silver does that mean that bitcoin becomes a real competitor to sovereign currencies

for payments not necessarily it is really it is a competitor to what the central banks want which they don't address here it's a competitor to total consolidation and centralization of the financial system. The founders of this country, the reason they have divided government, the reason they divided power within the federal government between the three branches, executive, judicial, and legislative, and the reason that they divided power

between the federal government and we the people and the states is because the thing they feared the most was consolidation, centralization, monopoly status. That is where the power abuse comes in. And that's what is in view with CBDC. At its core, money is a confidence game, a matter of faith and trust among the population that uses it. Well, you know, gold has been trusted by every civilization for as long as records have been kept. But when you look at the stress on the financial system right now,

banks, bank runs have drained $550 billion in deposits in just one week. This is vaccineimpact.com. Are we looking at an infrastructure collapse that will then be blamed on cyber attacks? Or will it be blamed on crypto? Something like that. But of course, the cyber attack angle that Brian talks about here is the fact that this is what's been pushed by the World Economic Forum very heavily for over a year.

And so, as he correctly realizes, he said, it looks like the criminal banking cartel is about to consolidate their power by driving the smaller banks out of business. And again, having plausible denial bill, it's not us. We're not driving them out of business. It's the banking failure. We don't have anything to do with the banking failure. We've never done anything like that. You know, JP Morgan never orchestrated banking failures. Mr. Potter never did it. He never did it to try to put the savings and loan out of business. No, no, they've never orchestrated any banking runs. And, you know, if they say there's a banking run, well, it all started with those crypto rascals. We got to get rid of crypto.

That's the problem. Well, they're going to get rid of the small banks and they'll pretend they had nothing to do with it. He says, if you want to discuss private companies who receive billions from the U.S. government and defense contracts today, you need to add Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Elon Musk's Starlink, and all the rest of these. This is the real military industrial complex. It's not just Raytheon and the traditional Lockheed Martin and things like that, if the U.S. government cannot stop the bank runs and the collapse of the banking system,

will they just turn to big tech to shut down the entire banking system, either by taking down the Internet or the power grids or both, then blame it on Russia? As a matter of fact, you know, when last week I talked about it, I said, well, look at this. This is kind of interesting. Defense One said that the Pentagon had said, well, we got all these small government contractors that we depend on. And again, they were all high tech.

What they mentioned was artificial intelligence and cybersecurity and things like that. That's what they're focused on. That's what the defense industry is focused on. That is the pinnacle right now of the military-industrial complex. And so the Pentagon was saying, well, we have to be able to backstop these small companies that are vital to our security because of the high-tech computers and cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. And so if they're talking about that openly and if they're willing to do that for the small ones, don't you know that behind closed doors

they were saying, SVB, we're going to keep these guys protected because they're part of the national security state. The bad news for the banking sector is going from bad to worse. As it was reported today, the bank runs have drained $550 billion in deposits in one week. Banks have borrowed $165 billion from the fed this week.

And, um, it goes on and on. And of course they can go on and on because they'll just make up, you know, more monopoly money. And ever since the summer of 2020, the world economic forum has been talking about cyber attacks.

Last year, they were talking about the cyber pandemic and what happens when that comes. They're preparing people for what they're going to do. Reuters says Russian hackers appear to be preparing a renewed wave of cyber attacks against Ukraine, including ransomware-style threat to organizations serving Ukraine's supply lines, said Microsoft. Oh, so Microsoft knows?

Has Microsoft not seen Vault 7? No, they know what's going on. They just hope that you haven't seen Vault 7, which was shown by WikiLeaks. The fact that the CIA's got a program to make it look like they're anybody they want to look like. They can look like Russians. They can look like Chinese, Iranians, anybody. Right? And, of course, we knew that that was the case even before that was leaked.

I talked to John McAfee. I talked to William Benny, and they both said, yeah, yeah, yeah. Nobody worth their salt would actually leave their fingerprints all over this. Unless they're thinking, well, they're going to, if I, you know, the Chinese are doing it, I say, well, if I just do it as a Chinese hacker, then they'll, maybe they'll think that it was actually somebody else because they've got this software vault seven. So I, you know, to, to mask this, it doesn't identify it. So you can say that as a cyber attack, but just understand this. When anybody like Microsoft or the U S government tells you that this came from Russia,

they're lying to you because they don't have the ability to tell that. It can be coming from anywhere. It could be coming from the Pentagon, masking themselves as Russians. And it's been that way from the very beginning. And we have the software. The software was released. The people who hacked the CIA or the NSA, I don't know who had Vault 7. I think it was the CIA.

But the people who hacked the intelligence agency and stole their software, they've now put that software out everywhere. WikiLeaks at first just released the manual to show that they had that capability, but they didn't release the code. Other people released the code, and so finally WikiLeaks released the code as well. So that code is out there. Anybody, not just our government, anybody can look like anybody. And so when they tell you, well, these are cyber attacks that are being done by Russia,

they are lying to you. Reuters says, since January 2023, Microsoft has observed Russian cyber threat activity, adjusting to boost destructive and intelligence gathering capacity in Ukraine and its partners, civilization, military assets, and on and on. You can reason that it might have been done based on who benefits from it. But of course they don't like that kind of reasoning when it comes to the, uh, to the pipeline, the Nord stream pipelines. Uh,

so you can understand that that is, is what is in view here, but, uh, there's no way that they can tell about that. That's why it is so dangerous. And that's why, that's why it was so dangerous.

And the reason I went into that so much years ago, even when Obama was president, was because Obama made this pronouncement. Excuse me. He made a pronouncement that if we have a cyber attack, we're going to consider that the same as if we had a kinetic attack. So in other words, if something happened to the internet or the grid or something like that with a cyber attack, and we say it's from Russia, how do you know?

Well, you don't know. But if we say it's from Russia, we're going to treat that the same as if Russia launched missiles against our infrastructure like they're launching missiles against Ukraine. That's a very dangerous bridge to cross because that creates a tripwire for war that is there without any real analysis. We're going to be right back. Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. Hear, hear! It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes.

The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else. ¶¶ Liberty. It's your move. You're listening to The David Knight Show. That's right. It's all about consolidation. It's all about monopoly. If you let them have the tea business, there's no stopping them. They understood that.

And we better understand the same thing about this because, as Zero Hedge points points out the narrative is likely going to be that it was unregulated crypto investments posing a danger to the financial system unregulated crypto makes our financial institutes vulnerable to economic warfare something like that it'll also be blamed for uh destroying the planet because climate was a big part of this as well as well and then the next phase will be arguing that small regional private banks cannot guarantee the security of their customers money and it would be safer for individuals to bank with either giant international banks or directly with the central bank this is the way they're

going to spend this narrative. You can see so many different ways that, first of all, we know how they're going to use it, the hideous ways they're going to use it, but we can see how they're going to sell it as well. In the same way that we even had the blueprint for how they were going to sell the vaccines. All you got to do is to love your neighbor. Have the Christian pastors tell their people, this is loving your neighbor. It's not a loving thing not to do this. You don't want to feel guilty if somebody in your family gets it and dies because you didn't get the vaccine. Because if you got the vaccine, that would stop the transmission.

All of that lies. And it grieved me so much to see these talking points being repeated by well-known pastors. Just amazing to me throughout all of it. But, you know, we had the whole thing had been war-gamed by Yale, published on the NIH's forum and all the rest of the stuff. And we know how they're going to come out, just like we knew how they were going to come after that, just like we know how they're going to come after CBDC,

how they're going to market it. But people will still be fooled by it. And so let's talk a little bit about the campaign thing but before we do we've got a lot of people who have left messages here um on rumble uh thank you for the tip on rumble donald dumpster dumpster daniels ticket for 2024 there you go i she even checks the box of being female right to counter lala harris and she's got another one too i guess uh you know you could say uh we can out degenerate the democrats you know they've got these men dressed up like women because nearly it was biden says well more than half of the women in my administration are women, but you know, Trump could, Trump could say he knows her really well and vouch for her.

And, uh, we could go even lower than the Democrats on some of these things by having a prostitute. Uh, so yeah, I think, uh, dumpster and Daniels 2024, I think that'd be a good ticket. Uh, it'd be the ticket, right? On Rockfan, thank you. Curious Rex, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. That is very generous. As always, thanks for your hard work and faith. Well, thank you for your support. And on Rumble, a tip from Angus Mustang. Thank you, Angus. I see you there frequently. Can't disagree with Mr. or Ms. Levine, or they will label you a transphobic white supremacist. There you go. Yeah, I've been labeled that.

That's why I can't. As a matter of fact, this is probably as good a time as any to play this clip for you. This is a guy who has had a channel for a very long time on YouTube, and he just got the entire channel taken down. He typically, I don't think, had done anything that was political. You know, he does kind of a little spoof music. And with this particular one, he did a takeoff of the MTA. Remember that from, um, I don't see what was

the group Kingston trio had a big hit with that. You know, will he ever return? No, he'll never return. And his fate is still unlearned. You know, the man, they went up on the fair increase and he doesn't have the money to get off. So he's gone around in circles and so he does this little parody on um on the vaccine and uh here he is mrna the speed of science and his it's found ring tell you a story of a man named fauci on a tragic and fateful day he He put millions in his pocket and with Pfizer and Moderna filled the whole world with mRNA. Then all day long, Tony lied on TV stations saying, science is run by me. We can't afford even one grandma dying. Say goodbye to your tongue on me. Well, did that jab ever work? Oh, no, it never did work.

And our fate is still unlearned. Good ol' Fauci, Pfizer, Lyme. We tried to find the speed of science. It's the jab that never did work. They bought all the media. They locked Wikipedia. They fired you for thinking straight. Such a blatant conspiracy. They called you delirious.

The cult of mRNA. All the NPCs lined up at vaccine stations Proudly playing Big Pharma's game And when you're through they'll give you one more booster Now you'll never get off of that train Well did that jab ever work? Oh no it never did work

And our fate is still unlearned Shame and scandal, Pfizer lie We tried to fly the speed aside It's just a jab that never did work Tony Fauci will go down as pure abomination With the pussies who pushed it too Don't forget who was complacent, calling rape immunization No more refunds, your tax is due

All you denizens of Earth don't you think it's a scandal How they can't hold your lives away Just keep flicking boots and lying over petals Like to bite until you're dying for mRNA Well, did that jab ever work? Oh no, it never did work And our fate is still unlearned We all warned you, Pfizer lied We tried to fly the speed of science

It's the jab that never did work It's getting tough to ignore There's more people dying Stop denying there's something wrong And when at last this house of cards collapses Take my hand and let's sing this song. Well, did that jab ever work? Oh no, it never did work. And our fate is still unlearned. Blame germ theory, Pfizer lie. We tried to fly the speed of science. It's the jab that never did work.

Well, did that jab ever work? Oh no, it never did work. And our fate is still unlearned. Pfizer lie. We tried to fly the speed of science. It's the jab that never did. Jab that never did. And for that, he gets banned from YouTube. Because he criticized Fauci, right? I mean, it was Trump's jab, wasn't it? He paid for it, like I said. He was the producer. The producer pays for the film, and the producer promotes the film, provides the money to promote the film. And Fauci was the director of it. He makes the film, right?

So Fauci was the director, Trump was the producer, but everybody blames Fauci only, not Trump. His former YouTube channel was Found Ring, R-I-N-G. And you can find him on Twitter at Found Ring 1. But they just cut him off. No explanation. I can relate to that. I had my first time I was cut off by YouTube.

No explanation. A complaint has been filed and we have terminated your channel. What complaint? One complaint. I don't get three strikes. No, no, I got no response from YouTube, but for three months they sent me that little email message about every 10 to 15 minutes. It wasn't even a regular schedule. I just kept getting that. And they did that for about three months. And finally, because they were spamming me and I couldn't get them to stop spamming me, I couldn't get them to reply. So I set up a rule to put them into a particular folder. And it continued on for two or three months. They did over 8,000 messages telling me that a single complaint had been fired

but would never give me any information. And then when this show started, I started a channel. And immediately I started accruing strikes. The first one was, you one was beginning of January 2021. I said 2020 was the year the world became China. That was a strike. Can't criticize China. Can't criticize any of the lockdown stuff and all the rest of this stuff.

And then the final straw with me and YouTube was when I put up a Christmas channel. I said, well, let's just put up Christmas music that I play. Right. I put that up. It was up for six months and then, you know, put that up in December of 2021.

And then, um, in the summer of 2021, just shut down the entire channel again, no explanation, you know, at least when they shut me down, you know,

with this show, the first time they gave me a three strikes and you're out type of thing over stuff like 2020, the year the world became China. So Trump was not criticized in that. And now YouTube has restored his channel. How does that work? Why do you think they're doing that? I'll tell you why I think. Because Trump is such a divisive figure.

He's going to create a civil war and the GOP and they probably would like to have him in as president, but they certainly would like to have a civil war in the GOP. So YouTube doesn't have a problem with Trump on YouTube anymore. So they've completely restored him. Uh, rum a holistic nurse one, says, it astounds me other nurses can't see it. Maybe if they had to attend the funerals of all their patients, and most nurses I taught don't even know what theirs is, much less give appropriate informed consent. That's true. That's where it is. That's where our society is at this point. Let's talk a little bit about the stormy weather that is coming Trump's way. Stormy with a chance of smiting and a chance of an arrest, but maybe not. Because as soon as he put that stuff

out and all the market crowd is deciding how they're going to protect Donald Trump and how they will lay their lives down for him yet again, like they did on January the sixth, even though he stabbed them in the back and disregarded them, wouldn't lend them any help, just ignored them to save his own skin. I better not say anything about that. They might think that I actually instigated this thing. I'm not going to go there.

Right. Cause he's incapable of acting as his lawyer, Ty Cobb said, except a deeply wounded narcissist and incapable of acting, as his lawyer Ty Cobb said, except a deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge. His perceived self-interest was to distance himself from January the 6th as much as possible. And that included the people who were rotting in jail. Rotting in jail, rotting in jail. And so now he says, well, it looks like they're going to indict me and I might be arrested and booked and all this kind of stuff in New York.

So he says, protest, protest, protest three times, all uppercase, exclamation marks after each one of them. Will they? You know, the reality is that this is all going to work to his benefit. Babylon B knows it. You know it. I know it. He all going to work to his benefit. Babylon B knows it. You know it. I know it. He's going to play this as a victim.

He's going to play the victim like Alex Jones did. He's going to play the victim like Steve Bannon did. And he's going to come out making more money like they always do. Just amazing. But here's a Babylon B Manhattan DA announces plan to get Trump elected in 2024. That's what this is really. It's like YouTube wants him on YouTube now, civil war in the GOP. And perhaps they play the cards, right?

He could become president again and boy, they could have a field day with him on the second term, couldn't they look what they were able to accomplish the first time. He runs as a candidate saying, I feel all these concerns that you have. And, uh, he tells the conservative base, everything they want to hear. And he does a couple of things that are good in his first three years. Some bad things too. That Trump, uh, tax thing was not good for anybody except the really big people.

And Gerald Salenti called that from day one. He's right. He's right about that. But anyway, um, you know, he does some good things for the base, you know,

but there's a lot of things that he's still just talking about in his first three years. Oh yeah, we got to shut down. He didn't do anything about that. Anyway, um, didn't end the wars,

you know, didn't bring the troops home, didn't build the wall, all the things that he told his conservative base he was going to do. He didn't do that, but they still loved him. And then 2020 happened, and they still love him. That's why I say this is an indictment of MAGA and why they still love this guy.

But Babylon Bee says, quoting Alvin bragg the manhattan district attorney soros district attorney who is running this uh and the bablin b they quote him saying i will stop at absolutely nothing to put trump back in the white house where he belongs i'm about to charge up his base like you've never seen laughed mr bragg as he pulled out a hidden MAGA hat. I've already put in my request to be Trump's transportation secretary. I hear it's super easy. 2024, here we come. Yeah, if Buttigieg can do it, anybody can, I guess.

I think anybody can be transportation secretary when the goal is to shut down all transportation, right? Not the department department though. You know, when they take all of our cars and they've, uh, you know, throttled down all plane travel and all trucks and all trains on when they've throttled it down and, and the infrastructure is decaying, they'll still be a department of transportation. And you better believe that it's budget's going to continue to grow, even though there'll be no transportation former president trump said that he'll be arrested

tuesday said this on saturday i think it was yeah saturday he got on his truth social platform and put out a two-part post in part two he dropped the bombshell announcement that he is to be arrested tomorrow. Um, the 21st, he said, uh, it emerged on Friday indicating that his arrest would take place sometime next week. And, uh, again, this is over hush money. We'll talk about whether there's anything to see there. What is interesting, I think, is that whether you're talking about the Trump loving press or the Trump hating press, nobody's really talking about the Trump-loving press or the Trump-hating press,

nobody's really talking about the supposed crime at the center of all this. It's all about what's going to happen to Donald Trump and how will his base react and all the rest of the stuff. There's no discussion really of the merits of the case much. And, you know, I saw some stuff where Cohen, who went to jail for a year and then was under house arrest for a year, said, oh, this is serious, they sent me to jail for it, so this is a really serious crime.

Well, that doesn't say anything at all. But the general part of this was that he gave hush money to Stormy Daniels, who was threatening to go public about an affair that they'd had many years earlier. I don't say it's an affair. It was a transaction. She's a prostitute, the porn star prostitute. And so she was going to go public with it. And, uh, so the implication is that, uh, I don't know what the charges and the conviction were against Cohen. I didn't go back and look it up, but the implication for Trump is that he

told Cohen to pay stormy Daniels. I guess maybe he didn't report it properly or something like that when they convicted him. But, uh, what he is saying, and what the district attorney is saying is that Trump told Cohen to pay it and, um, a hundred grand. And then Trump reimbursed him for that and they were doing it to keep it quiet. So therefore it was an an election expenditure type of thing which i think is a stretch former fec people say it's a stretch i

don't know chris christie didn't think that was a um a liability he said he's got three different ones that people are talking about they might arrest him for, but he goes, that's not one that is, there's only one that he said was real jeopardy for Trump. So even Chris Christie, who does not like Trump, said, no, I don't think anything's going to happen. They've got a guy who was, they bill as an FEC expert, but the guy was a Trump appointee, and he works for Heritage Foundation. And so, you know, I don't, and besides that, we're not talking about a trial here.

We're talking about a political exercise. It doesn't matter if he's guilty or not. I mean, perhaps that's why nobody's talking about it. It really doesn't matter as we've seen over and over again, as we've seen with the January 6 trials. It doesn't matter if any crime was committed. This is a political persecution. And so they'll come after somebody who, like in the case of Sam, the photographer at Infowars, he goes in, the doors are all open, and the police are standing there, and they're not telling anybody

you can't come in, they're not blocking anybody from coming in. He's a reporter. And so he goes in with a camera, and he's taking pictures of it. Now he's going to go to jail for that. in there and they're not telling anybody you can't come in. They're not blocking anybody from coming in. He's a reporter. And so he goes in with a camera and he's taking pictures of it. Now he's going to go to jail for that. Oh, well, you know, thing is, he said, hey, this is great. We're winning. Yay.

Or something like that, right? Some kind of political speech cheering it on. Well, we do have free speech, right? And we do have a free press, right? Well, no, we don't. This is a political persecution. And so it really doesn't matter whether Trump violated any FEC laws or not. It's all just a political calculation.

Do they have a prosecutor who's willing to do it? And is New York going to be as the jury pool that they pull out of New York or whatever? Are they going to be as biased and criminal in what they're doing as the jury pools that they're pulling out of Washington, D.C. are against the January the 6th people? So anyway, paid him through Cohen and then reimbursed Cohen. And so they're said to be considering charges related to falsifying of business records, alleging that Trump used illegal means to obfuscate his records and to hide the hush money payments between him and Cohen.

You know what this reminds me of more than anything? It's what they did to Dennis Hastert, right? Dennis Hastert, if you remember, longest serving speaker of the house for Republicans, I think maybe for Democrats as well. This is a guy who was a pedophile wrestling coach and the Republicans saw an opportunity there to get him into Congress because he's blackmailable. And then they saw even more opportunities because he was so easily blackmailed.

They could make him speaker of the house. And he became Dennis Hastert was speaker of the house for quite some time. Even while he was so easily blackmailed, they could make him Speaker of the House. And he became, Dennis Hastert was Speaker of the House for quite some time. Even while he was there, there was the House paging scandal and things like that, and they accused one member of Congress of coming after an underage page. And I remember Dennis Hastert going on with Rush Limbaugh, and the two of them were saying, this is just political. There's nothing here. Well, there was.

There was. And then same thing happened with Hastert. He covered it up for other people. And then after he leaves, somebody that has grown up now, that was a victim of his when he was a high school wrestling coach threatened to go public. And so Dennis Hastert was going to pay him blackmail money, just like Trump paid Stormy Daniels blackmail money. And they came after him not for being a pedophile because the statute of limitations is only a couple of years. That's the big outrage.

But they came after him because he structured the money, structured his withdrawals so that it wouldn't be noticed. Because when he first took out the first cash payment, the people at the bank said something to him about it because it was a large amount of money. And so he started doing it just under the reporting threshold so it wouldn't draw their attention. That, they said, was a crime. That shouldn't be a crime. That shouldn't be a crime. And so they sent him to jail for structuring. And when the judge sentenced him, he mentioned the pedophilia stuff. That's what it was really about, but they came after him for something else. Now, you know, what Trump should be going to jail for is the Trump shots. He should be going to jail for the lockdown. He should be going to jail for so many things that he did to us, his traitorous actions against the Constitution, against our society,

the rule of law, everything else, the Bill of Rights. But no, they'll try to make an issue out of the money that he paid this porn actress. And it is, to me, that is the insanity of all this stuff. And of course, going back to the case of Dennis Hastert, they could, and I said it at the time, I said, look, you can fix this. Just take off the statute of limitations for this stuff and come after him for the real crime of pedophilia not the withdrawal of money that you've already put in the bank you've already paid taxes on that's nobody's business

anyway that shouldn't even be reported to the government and so um uh that the way they could have fixed it was just to remove the statute of limitations because the crime is there. The statute of limitations is just blocking people from doing anything about that crime. And when you pull that statute of limitations off, you can go after people. We're seeing that in a lot of these trials that are happening in California now. In the entertainment industry, we had Olivia Hussey, and I forget who the actor was that was in Romeo and Juliet, but they are suing

the studio for big bucks because they say the director, Franco Zaffarelli, when he did Romeo and Juliet, encouraged them to do a nude scene when they were underage, said he wasn't going to do it, and that last minute he threatened them, said, we're just going to can the whole film if you don't do this type of thing. And they were young and they were under age said he wasn't going to do it. And that last minute he threatened them. So we're just going to can the whole film.

If you don't do this type of thing. And they were young and they were impressionable and, you know, and, and, uh, they always regretted it, but they couldn't do anything about it because the statute of limitations, California temporarily removed that statute of limitations. And so you see some rock stars and some Hollywood stars and some studios now with jeopardy with this temporary removal of the statute of limitations. There shouldn't be a statute of limitations on things like that.

Anyway. So the reaction. Well, you see headlines like this. Officials prep for protests as MAGA sycophants push a patriot moat around Mar-a-Lago. Well, when you look at this article from Yahoo, it turns out there was only one person saying that on social media. And some people respond to it, but only one person said it.

It isn't like this is a big thing. But, you know, when you look at this, the whole idea that people would go and circle the wagons around Mar-a-Lago to make sure that he is not arrested. Wasn't it Trump that was always saying, you know, they're coming after me because I'm between them and you. Isn't it just the opposite? Isn't it just the opposite? January the 6th as well. But he's telling everybody he's going to be arrested. New York Police Department has, as Trump is saying,

protest, protest, protest. They've got 700-member unit that is trained in disorder control. I'm sure that's something like I was showing you last week, the thuggish attacks of the French police, riot police, and the Greek riot police, all decked out in armor and shields and helmets. And then the Greeks set up a Greek phalanx, and there was just a crowd of people walking down the street

with signs and everything, peacefully, not doing anything. And they come in from a right angle and just start hitting people and shoving people like, you know, trying to make them, I guess, look like the aggressors. They were clearly the aggressors from the very beginning. So again, 700 cops are waiting for you there. If you want to go protest, protest, protest on the part of Trump and, you know, we can run that movie again if you want.

I've seen it all. So up close and personal with Stop the Steal. So you have Ali Alexander, one of the ringleaders of Stop the Steal, along with Alex Jones, suggesting 100,000

patriots should shut down all the routes to Mar-a-Lago. Ali Alexander said though he would not be participating in such an event. Yeah. He'll, he'll send everybody out. Go get them. Go get them.

Yeah. Just like Sean Hannity and war anywhere. Right. Ali, Ali Alexander and Alex Jones. Yeah. You go, you guys go get them. You know? Yeah.

Uh, you want a war? I'll send them to you. Okay. You got one. You got war? I'll send them to you. Okay. You got one. You got one. I'll send them your direction. Alexander, Ali Alexander claimed on Telegram to have spoken to Alex Jones, his previous partner with January the 6th. Stop the steal.

He says Alex Jones doesn't have any interest this time in organizing another protest in the name of trump well why he hasn't figured out a way to monetize it i guess right stop the steel was a grift it was a lie for money from the very beginning it started two days after the election i had steve pachinik giving everybody this false hope and everybody passing this thing around it was amazing how viral it went rush limbaugh was talking about it you had clarence thomas's wife passing it on and steve pachinik the cia operative that works with alex was saying oh yeah the arrests have already started this is two days after the election the rest have already started it was a sting the whole we know all the people who put out these we gave them phony, and we got quantum computing to track this,

and we got 20,000 National Guards out there arresting people. It's like, oh, really? Why don't we hear anything about that from any? Oh, it's secret. It's happening secretly. So I knew it was a lie. I could not understand why anybody was falling, but everybody was falling for it. And so I opposed it in my social media when I still had, you know, people could still see my account on Twitter.

I opposed it on my show. I opposed Alex. I continued to oppose him until he fired me because it was about the money. There was one thing Alex said that was true about that. He said, I couldn't afford to keep David. He was like, yeah, because I was telling everybody he was out there. And I kept telling everybody, don't go to January 6th because it's a trap. There's going to be agent provocateurs. And I said that all the way up to the morning of January the 6th.

And so during an emergency Saturday broadcast, it reports Yahoo News, Jones carefully attempted to thread the needle between supporting Trump's calls for protests. See, you always got to find a way to support Trump. You don't want to get the MAGA cult angry with you. So you always got to suck up to Trump. So he wanted to thread the needle there between what he knew was true and what was going to get him in trouble and still sucking up to Trump. So he thread the needle between supporting Trump's calls for protests over a possible indictment,

even warning his own followers of potential fallout from such events turning violent. He says, don't be provocateur into violence. Same thing. He fired me for saying in December, 2020. Uh,

so again, I guess he just hasn't figured a way to make money from it, but again, he has, because I had all these people sending me these articles. Oh, look, InfoWars is saying this and InfoWars is saying that. I looked at the site and even today, after two days of winding down half of their site up at the top, you know, they feature their articles, eight articles for the eight was about Trump. Now, half of their site up at the top, you know, they feature their articles, eight articles. Four of the eight was about Trump. There was even an article there, Trump arrested. Pure clickbait from Paul Joseph Watson.

Unbelievable. Anyway, as I said, other ultra-maga personalities took swings at Trump for even suggesting protests. This is from Jesse Kelly. He said the last time Trump's biggest fans protested on his behalf, he left them all to rot in jail without so much as a penny from him in legal fees. Not a penny. Shame on him for this. Do not go to a blue area and protest for

this man. Ignore this. That's right. He kept all the pennies himself. That whole thing, his grift, Alex and Alexander, they had stopped the steal. And Roger Stone. They had stopped the steal. But Trump's Save America, they had stopped the steal and Roger Stone. They had stopped the steal.

But Trump's save America, you had to give more than $8,000 before he had spent a penny on even fighting the election corruption that he said existed, right? The first $8,000 went to Trump and he split it with the RNC, with the Republican National Committee. split it with the RNC with the Republican national committee. And then he didn't spend a cent. And then they ran as far as they could from the stink that they created on January the sixth. So protest, protest, protest, uh, all uppercase Saturday morning, uh,

with exclamation marks behind it. And then the Trump team comes out and says, well, no, actually, there's been no notification of an indictment. He's not going to be arrested on Tuesday. Sorry, sorry, sorry. And yet, nobody looks at the war in Ukraine. Nobody looks at the banking crisis. Nobody looks at the ongoing poison that Trump produced.

But we look at this clickbait stuff, like Trump arrested that Watson did. That's what everybody's focused on. That's why I'm talking about this at this point in time. It truly is amazing to see how this is rolling. And Trump's defense. His lawyer shifted the blame to Michael Cohen, whose cooperation with the Manhattan District Attorney's Office

has accelerated its action against Trump. Under Cohen's directive, here's where we get a little bit of an idea about, so what is it that you're really talking about here? What's the crime? Trump authorized a payment to Daniels that the Manhattan DA contends was falsely categorized as a legal fee when Trump reimbursed Cohen for it. The potential charges coming from the Manhattan DA's office are a near carbon copy of the federal charge that Cohen pled guilty to in 2018 concerning the $130,000 payment that Trump made to Daniels

in the 11th hour of his 2016 campaign. According to Cohen, the directive to issue the payment came directly from Trump. He categorized the order from Trump for the purpose of influencing the 2016 presidential election. Cohen contended that payments to Daniels were made by him directly and that Trump reimbursed him for the $130 transaction itemized as legal fees, I just said. So, you know, why is this happening now? Well, again, it is simply political. Trump's attorney breathed life into the reality of similar felony charges against the former president by conveying that his client would follow

normal booking procedures if he was indicted, according to CNBC. So Trump is bringing it up. His lawyer is bringing it up, saying, you know, if they indict us, this is... And at the same time, his organization says, well, it hasn't been any indictment, and we don't have any information about him being arrested. So is this where we were at the very beginning, with the Babylon Bee, saying this is about getting Trump reelected, about betraying him as a victim? Many people are saying that, many people writing me,

not saying that the Manhattan DA is a Trump supporter with a secret MAGA hat, but saying maybe Trump wants this to happen. And Ramaswamy, who is running for president, says a Trump indictment would be a natural disaster. Well, he's right. So would a second Trump term. And that appears to be what is in play here. MTG, Marjorie Taylor Greene, blasts the the plans to arrest trump she says this is what they do

in communist countries well that's what they do in ukraine as well you know zielinski arrested his political opponents as soon as he won uh and of course she doesn't support the ukraine action but um yeah that's what this has come to maga supporters are demanding that desantis defy any trump arrests and this is why i said creating a civil war when you look at what these people This has come to MAGA supporters are demanding that DeSantis defy any Trump arrest. And this is why I said creating a civil war. We look at what these people are saying. They said, well,

DeSantis better use the national guard to protect president Trump. If people in Manhattan want to arrest him, he better refuse to extradite him. And so you got people like Stu Peters says, if Ron DeSantis is the conservative hero, he projects himself to be, he should refuse to honor the arrest warrant for president in exile, Trump, and send the Florida National Guard to Mar-a-Lago to ensure Trump's protection. Period. Anything less proves DeSantis is a fraud. Well, we've known that Stu Peters is a fraud over and over again.

You look at his snake venom in the water, garbage, and all the rest of this stuff. He's one of these people who adds lies to real problems to discredit them. And, of course, a real conservative hero is going to support Trump. And Stu Peters is saying this for audience. That's exactly what is happening. But this is the way it's going to shake down. If Trump gets arrested, well, DeSantis didn't protect him, so DeSantis is evil.

And it's not just Stu Peters. It is also Mike Cernovich. Mike Cernovich here. I will not extradite a presidential candidate. This is why he writes this out. Here's a statement that DeSantis should have to say. DeSantis has to say this. He says,

I will not extradite a presidential candidate to a Soros district attorney who allows violent criminals to roam free until there's been a proper legal review conducted under Florida law. If lawful, then extradition may occur, but not one day sooner. So again, that's Mike Cernovich. I'm a loyal Trump supporter.

Follow me. Follow me. And they have the political people, Kevin McCarthy, J.D. Vance, saying, oh, this is politically motivated. And of course it is. But everything today is politically motivated. Let me tell you, the real issue here is an indictment of MAGA. And I began writing this.

I'm going to change some of the things. This is not the full thing I started to write. I put this up on Substack. Because I think it's kind of interesting and ironic, really, that this is happening to Donald Trump. Because if you go back and you look at Clinton, I'll just read you the op-ed piece here, Clinton's crime outraged conservatives. It wasn't just his adultery, all of his crimes.

It wasn't just his adultery. It was also violent sexual assault, rape, corruption, financial payoffs. But Ken Starr chose to look the other way on all the criminal charges. And he focused simply on a consensual sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky. With that selective focus on consensual sex, the left was outraged that Clinton would be impeached. But he wasn't impeached for consensual sex. He was impeached for lying under oath.

Perjury. To cover it up. Was Clinton ashamed of it? Of course not. Did he think his base would care? Perhaps. Maybe he was embarrassed about it. Maybe he thought his base would care.

The irony of it is that his lie, his crime of perjury, was totally unnecessary. The left didn't care. And I've had this conversation with one person after the other on the left. They impeached President Clinton for having an affair. No, no, they impeached him for perjury. Martha Stewart was sent to jail, not for insider trading, which they started talking about in the first place. She was sent to jail for lying to the FBI.

Clinton was impeached and disbarred for perjury. Now Trump is facing his own irony. Trump believed that the right would abandon him if it learned that he had hired a porn star prostitute for sex and if they'd learned of his infidelity to his third wife, the mother of his newborn son, Barron. According to Michael Cohen, who pled guilty to the payoff, Trump took $130,000 to influence the campaign.

Perhaps both Trump and Clinton were ashamed, but I don't think so. I mean, if you look at these two guys hanging out with Epstein all the time, they're ashamed. Trump was not ashamed of his affairs. But the problem is that perhaps they got into these troubles because they believed that the American public had some sense of morality. We know Trump didn't. We know Clinton didn't.

The problem with them was, and this is the irony, that they both believed that the American public had morals. And we don't, do we? And so they committed little petty crimes to try to

cover it up. And by misjudging their supporters, they put themselves in legal jeopardy. Because neither the left cares about Clinton's rapes or his consensual affairs or whatever. They don't care about any of that stuff. And the right doesn't care about anything that Donald Trump does. He can kill your family and you'll still support him if you're a MAGA cult member, right?

So if you think that, let me just say this. If you think morality and character and integrity don't matter, I'm not saying this even from a religious standpoint. I'm saying this from a political pragmatic standpoint. They do matter. They matter a great deal. This is true for pragmatic, not for religious reasons. These people to whom we give power are operating as a trustee.

On a personal basis, would you hand over your home, your bank account to a financial trustee that openly brags about how he betrayed other clients who trusted him? What if he betrayed the trust of the people closest to him? Betrayed his wife, betrayed his children by extension. What if he openly bragged about his betrayals, as Trump did with his first wife, Ivana? George Washington, whatever his religious beliefs,

was a man who was focused on his integrity and his character. Rather than grasp power as some kind of an American king, he willingly laid it down and set a pattern for leadership. Leadership in America, up until the time of Lincoln, ambition was considered to be a character flaw and something that was disqualifying for life in the public sphere. Why? Because they're supposed to be public servants

and they're putting themselves first with their ambition. Trump is anti-Washington. He's not anti-Washington, D.C. He's not anti-federal government. Trump is anti-Washington. He's not anti-Washington, D.C. He's not anti-federal government. Trump is anti-George Washington. He is the antithesis of this. I can't tell you how disgusted I was

to see Alex Jones constantly holding him up during the 2016 election campaign as the reincarnation of George Washington and having pictures of Trump, you know, made crossing the Delaware or this or that. It was just disgusting. No two people could be more antithetical in terms of their character, integrity, and morality than George Washington and Donald Trump. And unfortunately, you could say that pretty much for all of our political leaders today. I don't see any George Washington's out there running for president.

Yeah. Trump is the antithesis of all of that. And, um, so our problem today is that most of us are looking for the lesser of two evils to run a system that is evil. Do you understand that? The presidency is evil. Washington is evil. We don't need to find the lesser of two evils to run an evil system. You got to figure out how we're going to get away from this thing, cut it off. Create a parallel system.

Start circling and making our defenses at the local level. Preparing at the local level. As long as America celebrates and follows immoral traitors like Bill Clinton and Benedict Donald, we're headed for stormy weather with a chance of smiting. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right

now. Yeah. Good job. And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the David Knight show dot com. That's a Web site. All right, let's talk a little bit about just some miscellaneous news I talked about last week.

The fact that Biden is using executive orders to do gun control stuff, right? He wants to, what he calls a universal background check. He says, we need to get as close to that as possible. Here's the executive order. You make it happen. Department of justice, ATF, all the people underneath the presidency. Where do you get that idea? Well, he got that idea from Trump.

Trump who said with a red flag laws, we'll take the guns and do the due process later. And then you had the Trump bump stock prohibition. First time that gun control was done by executive order bypassing even Congress's unconstitutional laws to do gun control. And so gun owners, America said, we wanted, we attempted to warn elected officials. Nevertheless, Congress rushed to sign gun rights away, including the 15 Republican senators who enabled the passage of the, quote, Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.

Well, President Biden just announced that he'll be using his regulatory authority to implement universal background checks. Thanks to that bill. Biden wants to use the expanded definition of somebody engaged in business to force you to file a background check for every single time you purchase a firearm. Anybody who sells, as I mentioned last week, anybody who sells a single firearm,

if you sold it for more money than you paid for it, uh, well, we have this thing called inflation at a pretty high rate, right? Uh, anyway, if you sell a single firearm for more money than you paid for it, then you're going to be considered to be a firearms dealer. And you better have a license for that. You better do all the background checks. You better snoop on everybody for that. Or you got legal jeopardy, which is what Biden is trying to run through. Obama attempted to do a similar executive order toward the end of his term in 2016. He attempted to expand the definition of gun dealer to restrict private transfers of firearms online and at gun shows to prosecute those who sell as many as one firearm unless they get a federal firearms license to punish punishing this otherwise lawful behavior with up to five years in prison and fines of $250,000.

That's where Biden got the idea. The third term of Obama. While Biden has just announced this executive order, we currently have no specifics on what that will entail. In other words, we don't know how many years he wants to put you in prison for selling a single gun to somebody else without filing paperwork with him. We don't know how much he wants to fine people yet. But Gun Owners of America says the fact is most people who are polled

in these anti-gun surveys don't even understand what a universal background check is, and they don't understand that what they're actually talking about is a universal registration. And if you put it in those terms, see, that's how they get the kinds of, oh, well, look, people want this. You do these polls and you select your terms in an appropriate way, and you can get the results that you want. That's the way these things operate.

The ATF has gotten financial information on potential gun buyers for warrantless tracking, reports the Epoch Times. The federal government has been using Americans' income and their gun purchases to conduct warrantless tracking and to deny Second Amendment rights. The BATF gave salary estimates to the FBI as a reason to have people's firearms purchases monitored. So they would say things like, well, this person doesn't make enough money to buy this

many guns in this period of time. So you should investigate them. Now, my question is, and it's not mentioned in this article, where does the ATF get information? How did they get information from the IRS? They're not supposed to have access to that information, right? And so if the ATF can get any information they want from the IRS,

then I guess any other agency can get any information they want from the IRS. Then I guess any other agency can get any information they want about registration or any of these other things as well. Right. Eric Pratt, again, gun owners, America said Congress needs to rein in this rogue agency by either exercising oversight over it or abolishing the unconstitutional agency.

And I'm glad he said that. You know, we don't just need to, hey, we need to go in there and clean up the ATF. No, you need to get rid of them. There's no authority for them to do that. If you look at the Second Amendment, right, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Everything that the ATF does is an infringement. Everything that the ATF does is expressly prohibited by the Constitution. How do they exist? Yet Trump used them to do gun

control, even bypassing Congress. And Biden is now doing the same thing with several different ways. He's got the pistol brace. He's got this. Now he's got the universal background check. I can just say I want this controlled. And I'm the president. I can do anything I want, you see. Oh, well, since we've got a dictatorship, we've got to have a benevolent dictatorship and a dictator in there. So we need to get Trump in there.

No, you need to get rid of the dictatorship. You need to alter or abolish the presidency in its current form and take it back to the Constitution. So when you look at the, again, you look at the ATF, just as I was saying before, they've taken the position that if something isn't expressly prohibited, then they can do it. But the Constitution says you can't do anything unless you're expressly permitted to do it.

But the problem with the ATF is that even when they are expressly prohibited from infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear arms, even when they're expressly prohibited, they still do it. Still do it. So new documents viewed by the Epoch Times from a FOIA lawsuit showed there were hundreds of pages, many of them redacted, showing ATF agents requesting warrantless surveillance by the FBI for unlawful reasons such as low salaries or past firearm purchases or for even sending quote bizarre messages. We don't like what this person had to

say or we think that they don't make enough money and so if they're buying and selling firearms it's got to be some kind of a criminal intent and again how would they know that? So you've got the ATF out there scouring social media to see what people are saying. You got the ATF going through IRS records and then sending all this stuff to the FBI, bypassing a judge who should be giving them a search warrant, right? No evidence of a crime, but, um, you know, this is a suspicious person. You better look into them. Uh, that's where we are right now. Uh, we talked a little bit about, uh, kitchen table issues last week. Well, Dollar Tree is now stopping the sale of eggs because they've just gotten too expensive. I guess it's just making them look bad. You know,

here they are Dollar Tree and you can't buy any i'm gonna sell them a single egg for a dollar or something um maybe two for a dollar i don't know but uh if they were to do this that to be honest they would have to change the name of their store to the five dollar tree or something or the ten dollar tree if they were to sell eggs so they're just not gonna sell eggs Egg costs hit a record high in January. They fell 6.7% last month, but they're still double, nearly double what they were a couple of years ago. They're 55% higher than they were a year ago

because now with Easter coming around, price of eggs are going back up again. And that's not the worst thing at the supermarket. Even worse, if you look in New York City, supermarket is collecting biometric data on shoppers. They have signs up that they're using facial and voice recognition technology. Quote, this business collects, retains, converts, stores, or shares customers' biometric identifier information.

This information can be used to identify or to help identify you. Examples of biometric identifier information are eye scans and voice prints. And so this is a good example of the way that they destroy society, right? Creating a problem, offering their solution, and you do it with what? You do it with chaos. You do it from the inside, and you do it iteratively, right? And so these district attorneys, you know, this is in the district where this Alvin Biggs or Braggs or whatever, the Soros district attorney in Manhattan is the one who's focused on Trump. And he doesn't care at all about shoplifting or the rest of this stuff. As a matter of fact, this is why they're doing it's chaos from the inside. And it's iterative because you see, if they can

create this kind of chaos in the grocery store, then the grocery store, the only defense that they've got, since there's no law enforcement, the only defense that they've got is to start putting in biometric surveillance data. Oh, Hey. And then the government can use that. They can tap into it, you know, just like they want to tap into the ATF wants to tap into your IRS records or all the rest of this record. They can all share this information. And it's not the government doing this biometric stuff.

It's the corporations. And even, and conservatives don't have a problem with that, right? Just like we're told with the censorship. Oh, well, censorship, that's being done by Google or it's being done by Twitter or Facebook or whatever, and they're private corporations. Corporations are people, and they're not only are they people, but they're people who have superior rights to you because they've got so much money and they can buy politicians.

It's like, no, a corporation is not a person. A corporation is a creature of the state. And the purpose of government is to protect our God-given rights. And the purpose of Soros and the left is to create chaos. Chaos that they can use to destroy your God-given rights and to have an excuse to do that. Unrumble, thank you for the tip. Geesebusters, geesebusters. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Uh, Trump is like a fungus that never goes

away. That's absolutely true. Yeah. And they're cultivating him on YouTube. Uh, that's true. Thank you. Geesebusters. Appreciate that. It's kind of interesting. I saw this California is home to almost one thirdthird of the homeless population in the United States. And yet, at the same time, California has a gross domestic product that is unbelievable compared to other countries. So they have a third of the homeless people, and yet one of the richest states. And this is something I always observed. Karen was from New York, and I went up there a few times before we were married. And my take on New York City was it was unbelievably wealthy people,

unbelievably poor people, and no middle class. And that's what is happening in California in general. And that is a recipe for tyranny, quite frankly. But yeah, just a few people on top with all the money and everybody else ground into the dust with poverty. Coming to Tampa at the time, now Tampa's become very big and changed. I don't even recognize it anymore. But when I grew up in Tampa, my grandparents, going back to at least my grandparents, they were all from Tampa.

And it was a small town, had had street cars pulled by horses and stuff. And my grandfather was, um, you know, working there as a streetcar conductor. And, um, but you know, growing up, my dad was, um, had his own business. And so, you know, try to make contacts with people and stuff. And he really wasn't doing any business to business sales. I don't know why he did it, but he'd get in things like the Rotary Club or whatever. But we had people even in our church that had small businessmen, but, you know, some people who were not so small business. People who owned grocery store chains. They're regional.

People who owned a fabric store chain that was national at the time when women used to make their dresses. You remember that? Karen saw something on social media. Somebody put up a thing about dress patterns and stuff. It's like, oh yeah, I remember my sisters used to do that and get the dress pattern and cut the thing out and sew it all together themselves. Now we got slaves in China to do that. We don't have to know how to make our own clothes, right? But he had a, the guy was a billionaire and you would never know it. And they lived like everybody else, but you go to New York and there's this stratification. And when you look at California, it's about to overtake Germany as the fourth largest economy in the world. And when you stack them up to 10 countries, they have the same GDP as 10 countries, even countries like Finland. And yet the population in California is 17 times those 10 countries combined.

The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It's The David Knight Show.