The David Knight Show - 22Nov22 GOP Has NO PLANS to Interfere with GreatReset

Episode Date: November 22, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESGOP announces what its focus will be. Do YOU think these are the existential issues?2:43US faces possible rail strike after largest union rejects labor deal. Will Congress use its power to stop?10:22California CARB wants to ban older diesel trucks by 2035 those with more than 800,000 miles. Whatever happened to "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle"? Durability is green, but they don't care.18:21What’s the lifespan of an EV battery?28:56Gun Control Fail: Colorado shooting was prohibited in MANY ways34:22EFF has collected data to show you the size of the Surveillance State where you live37:27Elon Musk posts sexually suggestive religious meme along with Bible quote to "tempt" Trump43:38"Vox populi, vox dei"? Musk totally clueless about its history51:38 Why does Musk think "Suffer the little children" has something to do with Sandy Hook? Or does he think its about censorship? Does Musk think?55:31Sunny Hostin (The View) claims Jesus would be the Grand Marshal in an LGBT pride parade. How does The View's Jesus compare to the Bible's Jesus?1:00:20Tim Allen’s new Disney+ series of “Santa Clauses” has his character wondering why people get angry when you say "Merry Christmas". Then people on Twitter get angry because he said it!1:09:23John Leguizamo says F*** Thanksgiving. Ungrateful, unthankful and completely blinded by his racism1:16:52FDA lawsuit says FDA lied to approve abortion pill. Claimed "pregnancy is a disease" and did NO safety testing. Sound familiar?1:25:37Testimony of GoFundMe shows that everything Trudeau said about the trucker Freedom Convoy fundraiser was a LIE1:38:13China’s first Covid-19 death since May: an 87 year old. Six months of locking down multiple cities with tens of millions. Starvation, deprivation for nothing. 1:45:03GOP Congressman says we need a strategy for Ukraine so we don't have another 20 year quagmire. Does he not realize THAT is the strategy?1:58:50The immorality of PREEMPTIVE war and ENDLESS war2:04:30Pentagon fails its FIFTH audit. In a row. They've only done 5 audits2:08:52The best black hole in the universe.2:11:00Here's how UK bypassing sanctions on Russian oil by cheating on their own sanctions.2:17:26Mr. Spock explains the coming ICE AGE, Boldly Going Where No Lie Has Gone Before. How the climate fraud began2:33:20Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.2:41:04Who invented the 1.5C degree figure in the first place?2:43:53Who is going to administer climate reparation funds?2:49:46The truth about the world's biggest carbon polluters from beginning of industrial revolution in early 1800's until today2:57:14If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 22nd of November, year of our Lord 2022, day 985 of the emergency. And it's kind of telling to see what Steve Scalise, who's going to be the House Majority Leader, kind of telling to see what his agenda is. He had an interview yesterday

where he talked about the top three things that they're going to be focused on. And I'm going to go over that because you need to understand that your salvation there's not even going to be any relief from any of this stuff it's not going to be coming from any of these political parties they're going to pursue their own petty grievances and vendettas against each other

just like President Trump they're incapable of acting except out of their perceived self-interest or vengeance. Stay with us. We'll be right back. what elephant what elephant in the room the associated press uh writes jonathan turley denies that there's any evidence that jo Biden discussed Hunter's business dealings whatsoever. Well, we know that it's true. We know that it's corruption. We know that they're all involved in covering it up.

President Biden's denials continued even after audio tapes surfaced showing President Biden leaving a message for Hunter specifically discussing coverage of those dealings. The call is specifically referring to these dealings. Hey, pal, it's dad. It's 815 on Wednesday night. If you get a chance, give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just want to talk to you. I thought the article released online.

It's going to be printed tomorrow in The Times was good. I think you're clear. And anyway, if you get a chance, give me a call. I love you. But who are you going to believe, writes Jonathan Turley? The media or your own ears? There are emails about Ukraine. There are emails about Burisma.

There are emails about all these different things. Yes, it is corruption. And I remember in the 2020 election, and so the Republicans have known about this for a long time, and they sat on this thing, and they have released it, you know, thought they'd have something like an October surprise. There's not enough time for them to show what is involved in that. I said, yet another lost opportunity to expose the deep corruption.

But now that's all they're going to be focused on. As I said at the beginning, the GOP, just like Trump, is incapable of acting except in its own perceived self-interest or out of vengeance. And what does that look like? Well, that means that, as Steve Scalise pointed out in an interview on Sirius XM, he said, our investigation priorities are Afghanistan withdrawal, the origins of COVID, the origins of COVID,

and the laptop scandal. That's their three priorities. So are they going to investigate the jab, the mRNA shot, the Trump shot? No, no, no, no, no. Will they investigate big pharmaceutical companies connection to that? Will they investigate Fauci, the CDC, the FDA? No. Will they go back and look at lockdowns? Will they do something to make sure that lockdowns never happen again? Will they get rid of the executive order about a state of emergency. None of this is on their radar. Will they do anything to stop Ukraine?

Of course they want. They love war and funding the military-industrial complex. They're not going to do anything to stop Ukraine. They're not going to do anything to stop this climate push. I'm going to talk about that as well. You know, Guard Goldsmith had a video. They did talking about Biden, his administration, John Kerry, pledging your money to other countries. Is it going to loot us seven ways to Sunday to pay for this stuff?

It's part of the great reset. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. And MRCTV could not even upload it to YouTube. They wouldn't allow them to do it. So they put it up on Rumble, other places. Yeah, that is the issue. See, YouTube understands what the central issues are. All those things I just mentioned.

You want to talk about the jab? You want to talk about the FDA, the CDC, Fauci? You want to talk about Ukraine? Oh, you're going to get taken down. They understand what the issues are. Republicans understand it as well. And they're not going to go there. They're like some of these media figures, these entertainers, I call them. They position themselves as commentators, political commentators. They're entertainers, and they stay away from these hot-button issues. They'll talk about cultural things.

They'll do it in a general way, or they'll talk about entertainers. You know, put pictures of them up, get lots of views, get lots of money. They stay away from the central issues, and the GOP is avoiding the central issues. Will I talk about the attempts to starve us of fuel using the climate MacGuffin? No. Will we talk about the CBDC? No, they're not going to talk about that either. They'd love to see that rolled out.

I could go on and on and on. You know all of these existential issues and you know, but none of them will be addressed. I'm not going to talk about Ukraine. They're going to talk about the Afghanistan pullout, the chaotic pullout. Well, why didn't Trump do it? Trump had four years to do it in an organized way. He had promised he would.

He didn't do it. He could have brought those troops home, and he could have solved the border issue without building a wall. He had a twofer right there, two for one. Wouldn't do it. I said that the entire administration. I began 2017 by saying this is what you should do, just in case you had anybody that was listening to InfoWars.

I don't think so. Anyway, all the great reset issues, NATO, nuclear war, none of that's on the table for Steve Scalise and the GOP leadership. What was their first priority, as a matter of fact? Their first priority after the election was to stab you in the back to push through a new federal definition of marriage. This one more LGBT friendly. To invite religious persecution of businesses.

To push through gun control. In Ohio and other places. No, but all they're interested in are scandals. And let me tell you, that is the biggest scandal of all. The biggest scandal of all is not even the laptop of Hunter Biden with all the stuff that's involved in that thing, that treasure trove of debauchery and corruption. That's not in that thing, that treasure trove of debauchery and corruption. That's not the biggest scandal.

The biggest scandal is the do-nothing, misdirection, misinformation of the GOP. Scalise, who was selected as the next majority leader in the U.S. House of Representatives, said James Comer would investigate the above-mentioned items in the next chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform. There'll be some people on the side who may talk about some of these issues. Have you heard a single Republican talk about CBDC? You know, you got people like Marjorie Taylor Greene. She's focused on the election and things like that. Yeah, it would be important. It would be nice someday if we had, uh, if we had fair elections, I might even vote again. I haven't voted in the last two elections because I don't, I've just gotten to the point where it's like, why even bother if these people are going to run such a clown show

on this thing? Uh, once I find out some local officials, I may go to vote for local officials, but I'm not interested in voting for any federal officials. Federal government is dead to me. It's no longer federal. It's feral. Just take the D out of it. It's gone.

It's like a domesticated animal that's gone wild and is hunting you in packs. It's like feral dogs. You gotta be careful about that. Right? Some dogs who have, you know, lost their owners, they band together and packs and they hunt people down like wolves or something. And, uh, that's what the government has become feral. So yeah, they'll talk about eco-health.

This is nothing but a distraction to take you away from the real bioweapon that Trump shot. And to cover for the big pharmaceutical control of government. So he said, Pelosi and Biden don't want to confront China on anything. So the GOP might confront China. Will they confront the World Economic Forum? Will they even talk about CBDC? Is there anybody in the Republican Party? They'll talk about CBDC.

No. This thing is rapidly rolling out. I was just talking to a friend last night. You know, he's convinced it'll be sometime in June. I don't have any prediction of timeframe, but I think it will be sometime the next year. You look at how rapidly this thing is going out. They had six months for every government agency to get back to Joe Biden with a report. They've already initiated a pilot program.

It's going to run for 12 weeks. That's three months. They will start rolling it out with incentives. And then they'll add coercion. And then they'll make it mandatory. They'll do it from the inside. They'll do it with financial disruptions. And they'll do it iteratively, just as they did with a vaccine, just as Fauci said in October, 2019 at Milken. How do we get a, an everybody

to take their universal flu shot? I want everybody taking at least one vaccine a year, everybody in the world. How do we do that? How do we roll this out without testing it right we do it from the inside we do it with disruption we do it iteratively says the gangster fauci so yeah that's the pharma mafia uh america faces a possible rail strike in two weeks after the largest union rejects the labor deal. Now everybody's talking about the fact that, you know, there's a whole bunch of different, um, railroad unions, a dozen of them as a matter of fact. And so the second largest one, they had two large ones who had a vote and they split one

of them approved at one of them disapproved it. Uh, this could be very disrupting, but I think what they will do is they will, I think you can actually, on this issue, you'll be able to get Congress to do something. They can compel them to go to work, and I think they will. Because even if one of them, and already we'd had three of them reject it, if I remember correctly, I talked about this before, even before the two big guys voted on it, Of the smaller unions, I think three of them had already rejected it. And even if just one of them does, the other ones will refuse to cross the picket line. So it has to be unanimous. Every one of these unions would represent different professions within the railroad industry. It might be the conductors.

It might be the engineers or whatever. They've got 12 of them. If one of them goes on strike, then all of them will honor it. And if the strike goes on for an extended period, it could cause shortages, higher prices for goods, of course, fuel and food. If the four unions that rejected the deals, that's right, it was three before, so now it's four. So a third of them have rejected it if they're unable to reach new deals before strike deadlines congress could order the railroad workers to remain on the job or return to work

which is what is going to happen they are going to order them to return to work you better believe it that they played all kinds of games to delay this until after the election, simply because they didn't want to interrupt their campaigning to come back and pass a bill to force the railroads to go back to work and to then have arbitration that would be enforced. So Congress is already facing calls from a wide range of business groups to act to prevent a strike because about a third of the nation's freight moves by rail. Congress has historically intervened to prevent rail disruption. In the event that the four unions remain unwilling to enter the agreements, they will do that. But of course, understand that once they they're concerned because again, you know, uh, they get this

stuff locked in. It's just like you have social security benefits that Biden was bragging about. Look at this. Look at how much I added to everybody's social security checks next year. Well, you got to wait for that to take effect. And by the time that hits inflation has long gone past the train station. And that's the thing. These people are driving their stake in the ground. Well, here we are right here. And before they ever collect the first check, inflation has already eaten into it. And it

continues to eat into it. And it's locked in that way. And these people do it with their renegotiations. But you know, when you do it with social security, you lock that in for a year. And of course, as I mentioned before, and even mainstream media and Twitter pointed it out to Biden, the increase has died to inflation. So he's only bragging about how much inflation he had presided over. But when we talk about what is happening with supply chains and with infrastructure, as I said long before Biden got elected. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

We were talking about what's happening with infrastructure. We're talking about how vulnerable our society is. I was talking about this before the lockdowns, about how vulnerable society is. Why is it so vulnerable? And it's not just our complicated infrastructure that depends on the internet and all these other things, but it's because we have created this just-in-time delivery.

And so everything about our society is strung out. And I guess you could put that in the 1960s vernacular. We are strung out in every way. We're tripping, man. But we won't be tripping if they have their way. They want to shut down movement and not just of individuals having mobility, being able to see the USA and your Chevrolet. That's what I grew up with.

Yeah. And that kind of individual mobility. Oh, they want to shut that down for sure. But they want to shut down the infrastructure mobility. And so you have this just-in-time delivery. Nobody stores anything anymore. With these sophisticated rapid communications and predictions and so forth, they would not create something until they had the order or whatever and could do it very quickly. But every leg of this stuff has a transportation component in it,

usually trucks. And so if you break that chain, you're going to break everything. If you stop the trucks from taking it to point A to point B to point C to point D, and if you tax it by increasing fuel expenses on these horrible oil companies, as the Democrats want to do, that's essentially like a value-added tax to the infrastructure. Value-added tax in Europe is very popular. It's not very visible, but it creates a lot of money. I used to always say, you know, why do they make us suffer through this IRS reporting thing

where you've got to go through and, you know, create this, I complained about that even before I had a business. Why do I have to go back and give them an account of everything that I did and all the money that I made and all the rest of this stuff? It's just too complicated. And it gets people annoyed. Why do I have to go back and give them an account of everything that I did and all the money that I made and all the rest of this stuff? Um, it's just too complicated and it gets people annoyed. And so in Europe, they could sustain a much higher, um, taxation level without as much resistance because it was, you know,

not visible to people. They did it with a VAT. Every time something would make another stage of production, they would add another tax to it. And so I thought it's kind of interesting that they're willing to take a lower tax rate because, you know, the higher you go, the more pressure there is for, hey, let's elect somebody else who's going to remove the taxes. So it's interesting that they would trade off and accept a lower tax rate in order to have the ability to surveil you, because that's really what the income tax thing was set up to, to surveil you, to entrap political enemies and that type of thing. Of course, the United States is in a unique position has been all of my life. As the world's reserve currency, uh, they can just print money without any auditing or accountability or anything.

The federal reserve, no audits, no accountability. You know, the Pentagon talk about this later. Pentagon has, uh, has started auditing itself in 2017. So I've had five audits. They have failed every single one. They have aspirations to pass an audit sometime before 2030 they said it's a criminal organization everything in the government is criminal it's feral the feral government that's not no it sound like i've got a southern accent

it's the feral government but it is it uh, it's gone government gone wild, but, um, no, it is, uh, it is a VAT tax when you do this, but listen to what California wants to do. They're not happy banning internal combustion engines for cars and things like that by a date certain. And this is coming from CARB, California Air Resources Board. This curse that has been unleashed upon the world, not just California, not just the U.S., but the world, leading in many of these areas. So now CARB wants to ban older diesel trucks. Diesel trucks.

They carry the merchandise from every different stage with all this just-in-time stuff. They want to destroy our infrastructure. And they want to do that by 2025. They're going to ban older diesel trucks. And then they're going to say all trucks must be electric by 2035, which means you're not going to have any. They don't exist. It's a figment of a politician's imagination.

They're going to ban what works. They're going to ban what we've got, and they've got nothing to replace it with. And this whole idea of rapidly charging these gigantic batteries, that is a disaster waiting to happen because that's going to increase battery fires and things like that. So despite a supply chain crisis, a result in record backlogs at LA and Long Beach ports last year.

Remember that? Remember the pictures, 100 ships or whatever backlog? Partly contributing to New York overtaking them. That's right. This is what's going to happen. People are going to redirect York overtaking them. That's right. This is what's going to happen. People are going to redirect shipping to other places. That's the solution.

I hope it happens. I hope they redirect shipping. Well, despite all that failure last year, the California Air Resources Board, CARB, is pressing on. Wall Street Journal reports the state will impose an electric truck mandate despite the lack of charging infrastructure, despite the space to build it, despite trying to create a market for electric trucks that don't exist. It's another one of these vaporware things. You've seen the Tesla electric truck driving around, right? Have you seen it pulling anything?

Have you seen the videos of what happens to the Ford pickup truck when it tries to pull something? Yeah. Okay. Well, let's see it work. Prove to me that you got something that works. I'm sure they can eventually come up with something that works, but the politicians don't care about that.

They have a deadline that is very close and you will do that and um or you'll have nothing and that's the point you see it's not about transitioning to anything it's about taking everything away from you now what they're going to do in terms of when we talk about banning older trucks from 2025 cal California would bar trucks powered by internal combustion engines that have more than 800,000 miles on them. Uh, so they can't go to ports and they can't go to rail yards and things like that. And, you know, when I looked at this, you know, 800,000 miles, um, that's a lot of miles, isn't it? I mean, we were able to squeeze 300,000 plus off of a Toyota van. That was a great, uh, reliable car. And I just gave up, but, uh, you know, diesels are known for doing this type of thing. I remember back in the day, um, uh, Mercedes would give badges back in the

1980s when they had, uh, the front grills that were, you know, uh, these metal grills that were vertical on them. And you'd see these people with mileage bags, uh, badges on there. Uh, you know, like these commemorative coins that you can get at the David Knight show suitable for putting on your, your, uh, grill. If you have one, nobody does anymore, but, um, uh, you know, you would get these, uh, you get it from Mercedes and you'd see these people driving around bragging about, uh, how durable their vehicles were. And that was in the early 80s, I'm talking about. And at the time, Mercedes was almost all diesel.

They only had a couple of cars. They had a top-end luxury sedan, the S, I think. And then they had the sports car. And those were gasoline. But all the rest of them were diesel at the time. Now, they've switched it the other way around around pretty much. But just think about that. 800,000 miles. That's renewable energy, isn't it? That's renewable. I mean, when you want to talk about renewables and when you want to talk about environmental impact of manufacturing, they always want you to forget about what

happens when you have to build a new car. Oh, we're not going to count that. We're only going to start measuring the amount of energy used on this thing once you drive it out of the showroom floor. No, there's a lot of energy that goes into these things, creating the batteries, creating the engines or whatever, creating the metal for the car and the rest of this stuff. So wouldn't it be better if we use these things for a long time? Weren't the environmentalists about recycling? When you talk about recycling, how about truck

engines that get over a million miles? How's that for recycling? Reuse, reduce, recycle. Remember that? That was just a lie to get you to buy all this stuff. These people are about planned obsolescence and they planned to make everything obsolete in the next five, 10 years, not even 10 years. We're now eight years out, seven years out. It's 2023 nearly. So we're seven years out from their planned obsolescence of everything in our society. Because if you're going to force people to throw away perfectly good diesel trucks that only have 800,000 miles on them, how many miles do you think you're going to get off of the electric batteries? How many miles do you think you're going to get off of um the electric batteries how many miles do you think

you're going to get i tell you they're going to be anywhere close to 800 000. nowhere close uh look it up and see i forgot to look this up um i was going to look it up and then i forgot uh look up and see what the average battery life is for an ev i'd like to know um so you know you get two or three hundred miles off of these things and then um uh you've got to charge it again uh just as with your laptop you have a limited number of cycles so it's fairly predictable uh and it degrades significantly, uh, before that. So, uh, speaking of batteries, Tesla has now recalled over 300,000 cars. Um, these are things that, uh, are kind of ancillary potential rear light failure.

Um, airbag front passenger side, airbag things, you know, airbags. And this is not anything that's unique to electric cars or Tesla. This is unique to the feral government. That's predatory. And, you know, the Takata air bags, air bags made by this one company, Takata, have exploded and killed people. And exploded and malfunctioned. They explode when there's not a, um, uh, a collision and that's bad enough because it's hitting you kind of with a force of a collision, but worse than that, the Takata airbags, when they would explode and they were exploding

primarily in, um, Southern humid climates, you had corrosion that was going on inside of it. And when these things would explode, uh, they would, uh, it was like shooting shrapnel into your chest, killing the people.

Uh, that's an addition to remember when they first rolled out these airbags. And, um, they said, well, you know, if you're not wearing your seatbelt,

these things will kill you. If you're a woman or a child. Oh yeah. Women and children. We don't care. We didn't really test it for them. Um, it makes things considerably worse. If you're wearing a seatbelt seatbelts have

been shown statistically to improve your survivability. Uh, the, uh, airbags, uh, reduce your survival. It's supposed to be a supplemental restraint system because it's supposed to supplement your seatbelt. If you're going to, you know, it's the best argument to make people wear a seatbelt is that the government mandated airbags will kill you. If you don't forget about the tickets, the airbag will kill you. That's the reality of this thing.

And they wouldn't turn it off for the longest time, even though they were saying, look, you know, this is, uh, you set these things up and it's, it's really not set up for women who are smaller and lighter weight, especially for children who are smaller and lighter weight, especially for children who are smaller and lighter weight, but they wouldn't, they fought it for a long time before they'd allow people to turn off the airbag in case they had to put a child in the passenger seat. And the Takata airbags have killed about 14 or 15 people. They did massive recall, unlike the vaccine, right? Another one of the examples of why aren't we recalling the vaccine?

You want to tell me that globally, we can't make a case that there were 14 or 15 people who died. I mean, you got more than that who died instantly after getting the shot and, uh, just in one country, this one, but they won't tell you, um, they won't stop this one way or the other. Well, it's not just that. Okay. Thank you. My son got his life spent. An EV battery depends on a number of factors.

While battery life can vary. EV manufacturers are required to issue a warranty for at least eight years or 10,000 miles, 10,000 miles. However, some manufacturers offer lower, longer warranties. Kia offers a battery pack warranty for 10 years or 100,000 miles. And now California Carb wants you to throw away diesel trucks that have 800,000 miles on them and are still working fine. I don't know how far they're going to go. I'm sure we've got a lot of truckers who listen to the program. I'm sure they'll be writing me, telling me stories about how many miles they got out of this thing.

We're going to take a quick break i want to thank brian potty thank you brian uh for the tip even before the program began and we're going to take a quick break and we'll come back we're going to talk about another failure of government gun control as illustrated by this most recent at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Shooting in Colorado. The common man.

They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com and i want to thank angus mustang who tipped on rock fan he said what will the shaming name be for those of us who don't want electric cars will we be called anti-ev years yeah by the people who

are for ev forever for ev. They'd be forevers. That's, except they don't last forever. You have to replace that battery pack. It certainly isn't going to go like a diesel engine. And you think about all the energy that's going to be wasted because the California Air Resources Board has rejected the idea of reduce, reuse, and recycle. Because they're lying hypocrites. It's a MacGuffin. That's all it ever was. So thank you for the tip.

I appreciate that. And I do want to say yesterday, we mentioned some of the people, most of those checks were from the end of October because we've been, uh, going back and forth from, uh, we had another wedding that was in North Carolina and some other things. So I apologize for not mentioning those sooner. But these are some that have come in in November. Thank you, Scott C., Mary and Donald H., Jeffrey and Carrie W., Edwin and Cynthia B., and Mary N. We have four more that I'll get to later. And thank you

very much for your support. It really does mean a lot to our family. And if you would like to support us, you can find that as you've seen in the commercial, if you go to the David Knight show.com see where the show is. And again, I'll mention it because, um, it takes time to, to put the outline in after the show. And so we're putting an outline in and we, we list that with all of the, um, uh, when we do the podcast and then that gets sent out to the podcast, um, various providers like iTunes, I heart things like that. And, um And some of them, it makes for a very long description file, very long. And it's not hard to read through. I leave spaces with it.

So it tells you briefly what's being talked about, about every seven to 10 minutes. And then there's a time code there. So if you don't see that, who are you getting the podcast? It may be because the podcast, uh, intermediary, which is iTunes. In other words, they're not hosting it. It gets sent to them, uh, maybe because they don't support that. So if you go to Spreaker, uh, you'll see the full description there. And when you see the description on the video sites, you'll also see that.

But at Odyssey, if you go to Odyssey for the video, you can actually click on the time code that's there, and it'll take you to that point in the video. So I just want to mention that again. So thank you to everybody who has supported us. Gun control fail. That's the bottom line. Yes, it is a tragedy.

And every time we have a tragedy, it was a gay nightclub that was shot up. Every time we have one, it's used as a premise, as an excuse to increase gun control measures, except that the gun control measures that were enacted a decade ago, things like red flag laws, magazine bans, and all the rest of the

stuff should have stopped this, but it didn't, uh, none of that, uh, was relevant to this, uh, should have been the guy who was known he had already been reported for bombing threat and some things like that. We see this happening over and over again. The people who are known to authorities, who have already been identified as dangerous people, who have made threats in general or in particular to people, nothing is done in terms of background checks or the rest of the stuff. So Colorado Springs Club Q. The shooting occurred despite the fact the state adopted stringent gun controls in the months and years following Sandy Hook.

Universal background checks were put in by Governor John Hickenlooper March of 2013. So that's just like three or four months after Sandy Hook. Days prior to the bill being signed, Colorado Republican House Minority Leader Mark Waller warned, quote, if the goal is to enhance public safety, this bill won't do it. If a criminal wants to perpetrate a crime, he can still get a gun. Well, that's true. He was quoted by Reuters as saying that at the time.

But notice he says, if the goal is to enhance public safety, that is not the goal. The goal is to take guns away from you. And that is not going to enhance public safety. It's going to destroy it. Hickenlooper signed a bill A ban on high capacity magazines Into law at the same time that he signed The universal background checks USA Today noted that

Colorado passed a so called Red flag law in 2019 That allows police To seize firearms from individuals Deemed at risk to themselves Or to others You take the gun and you do the due process later. Remember that guy who said that?

Oh, yeah, Trump said that. And guess what? If you do the due process after you've confiscated something, then it ain't due process. The due process is due before you take action against somebody. Because we have a presumption of innocence here in the United States that Donald Trump doesn't seem to care about. Uh, so that's the article of the angle from Breitbart.

And they're absolutely right about that. Uh, it, uh, all of these measures that are going to save the object is not to enhance public safety. It's to confiscate guns. If you want to see the surveillance data work in your own community, reason magazine has, um, and actually the data came from the electronic frontier foundation,

EFF. And, uh, they have a link to the site where you can look at EFF Atlas of surveillance project. They said it hit a bittersweet milestone. Uh, they now have hit 10,000 points of surveillance and their database. And that's up significantly from 2020 when it only had 3000.

Uh, so now it's everywhere, including at least partial data on approximately 5,500 law enforcement agencies in all 50 states, as well as most territories and districts. So now 10,000. And so what you do is you, you want to find the link to this and go this reason article, and it will take you to the EFF database. He said, um, he searched for Cottonwood, Arizona, the nearest town to my home. He said, he searched for Cottonwood, Arizona, the nearest town to my home. He said, like many law enforcement agencies,

the Cottonwood Police Department uses body-worn cameras to minimize disputes over what happened between interactions between police and the public. It also revealed that the Cottonwood Police Department has a partnership with Ring. Ring. The Amazon-owned home security company. Uh, and of course, uh, this, this fuels our, our major point of, uh, distraction in our

life. When we sat down for 15 minutes, uh, and, and look at YouTube videos of things that happen on people's front porches or, you know, a camera captures some kind of an automobile going crazy through a neighborhood or something. That's the doorbell cameras ring one ring to rule them all because they use the ring is a given access to the police. Every one of those things is not there just to connect a funny YouTube video

or to expose porch pirates. It is also being used to surveil everybody. It is the eye of Sauron or Jeff Bezos, depending on your perspective. It's a relatively easy way to build a surveillance state Installed and paid for by those being scrutinized What an idea Except if you go back to, you know, the Ed Snowden information was leaked in, I think it was 2013 From NSA Prior to that, I've talked about this many times

A series of slides, which the American press never, ever covered I've covered it over and over and over again. So if you watch this program, you've probably heard me talk about it, show you pictures of it. I don't have the pictures today. But the NSA, prior to 2013, prior to the Snowden leaks, had set up three slides where they were laughing at people for buying smartphones. They said, who would have thought in 1984, and they show the 1984 Ridley Scott Super

Bowl commercial introducing the Mac. So they show a picture of that. Who would have thought in 1984 that this would become Big Brother? And they show Steve Jobs holding an iPhone. And the next thing is everybody lined up in front of an Apple store. And the NSA says on that slide, and that the zombies would line up and pay for it. And the zombies are doing it again.

I want that doorbell camera. Look, you know, doorbell cameras are fine. Just make sure you don't get one that's tied into Amazon and the police department. Um, you know, keep it yourself. But again, you know, you, it's very easy to build a surveillance state when the

zombies pay for it themselves. We buy our big brother device and now we're buying even more surveillance devices out of curiosity. He says, I also pulled up a map of the road trip that my son and I recently took to visit the campus of Kansas State University. I like driving to see the sights, even with no highway equivalent of the TSA yet. Yet. It's increasingly difficult to escape scrutiny on these journeys.

And see, that's the other thing, which he doesn't mention. And that is how you are being watched in so many different ways. I mean, that big brother device that you use for navigation, that's reporting, has been for quite some time, reporting to traffic people. Going back to the late 2000s, I did some work for the Department of Transportation in North Carolina, and they had a service that everybody subscribes to called Indrix,

and it would show you the kind of stuff. That was going back to the mid-2000s. They'd show you the kind of stuff that you see on your phone all the time. When you see the traffic back, you see like a green line or a yellow line or a red line to show there's been some kind of an accident and the traffic has stopped. They used to be available for subscription purposes only. Now they're collecting. How'd they collect that? Well, they're looking at your phone. They may be anonymizing it or maybe not, or maybe they're selling that information to the government.

Geospatial intelligence is what that's really the gateway to. And that's been the fastest growing aspect of the intelligence community since the late 1990s, geospatial intelligence. So yeah, with no highway equivalent of the TSA yet, it's increasingly difficult to escape scrutiny on these journeys. According to the Atlas of Surveillance, we pass through jurisdictions

that in addition to body cameras and doorbell cameras, register private surveillance cameras for official use, monitor the public with drones, attack gunshots, use facial recognition, Yeah, these are the people who demand to know everything about us and will tell us nothing about what they're doing. We're going to take a quick break. And, um, when we come back, we're going to talk about, um, uh, what is going on with, um, a little bit more, a little, uh, agenda, short agenda to the free speech issue of a Twitter over the weekend, something I think was very telling. Stay with us. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football

the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back

as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing Cheltenham

with Live Score Bet this is total betting sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

We'll be right back. ¶¶ Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. All right, and before we begin this next segment, I just want to thank some of the other people who have sent checks in November. Robert and Laura B., Michael C., Rita L., Jeffrey, and Cynthia C. Thank you very much, all of you. Appreciate that so much. We have as an addenda to what Musk did in terms of bringing back Trump and defiantly refusing to bring back Alex Jones. Elon Musk went biblical on us in a way. He started quoting Bible verses, even quoted a Bible verse to Sam Harris, the atheist. But of course, he has no idea what he's talking about.

He takes it completely out of context. This is a guy, Musk, who's gone in just a couple of weeks from Baphomet to blasphemy. His profile picture on Twitter is him wearing his Halloween costume with Baphomet on his body armor, Baphomet on his chest. So there you go. That's the guy. Uh, and so he kicked Alex to the curb yet again, uh, doubled down on it as people were asking him about it. It's kind of interesting, you know, years ago, Alex was such a big cheerleader of Elon Musk.

Like he was with Donald Trump. He loves billionaires wants to be one, uh, cause he loves money. But I remember when Elon Musk launched the Tesla roadster, he said into space. And, um, and it was pretty amazing. I was just ripping Elon Musk from one side of the other and saying, I don't even know if this thing is real. And then Alex was like, we're going to the stars and this guy's going to take us there and all. It was, it was funny that the back and forth, but now he's, you know, it's unrequited love I got to say.

Um, so I do think the idolatry was sincere. Uh, just as I think the idolatry for Trump was sincere because it's fundamentally about money and position and audience and that type of thing, which is way forward, but you know, when it comes to the billionaires, uh, he loves Trump, he loves Musk, he loves Patrick Byrne over stock. He's never seen a billionaire. He doesn't admire or love, but, uh, Musk lifts the Trump Twitter ban. Then post sexually suggestive religious meme along with a Bible quote.

That's the headline from this article, but I would call it religious porn. That's what he did. Yeah. Religious porn. I'm not going to show you the picture of it. As a matter of fact, even CNN didn't want to show the picture. Their producers opted out of this crude meme that he created. Not only was it pornographically crude, but it was also crudely done.

You know, Elon, you're a billionaire. You can afford to hire a graphic artist. Come on, stop being so chintzy. You probably got some who are working for you. Who knows if you're going to do memes, man, do a better job of this. He puts up a picture of a monk. It was identified by CNN as Jesus. Anybody with a beard and a robe is Jesus. No, it was a monk.

It had a skull cap on, things like that. It's a picture of a monk, and plain black aerial font with a white background stuck on. I said, this is Trump, you know, and, uh, it says, lead me not into temptation as he's trying to look away. And he's got this pornographic image of a girl with her high, her dress, uh, hiked up and, um, Twitter, um, atcoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham

with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.

Logo being used as a fig leaf. But in addition to that, of course, some people going back a couple of days when he was talking about his polls, I said he wanted to have a poll. Polls sometimes are to push you in a particular direction, push polls that they use in elections all the time. Sometimes they want to find out what you, what you are thinking. Not usually frequently, the polls are used to, um, grab your email address or something like that. In this particular case, this is a poll that was used to basically put a fig leaf on Elon Musk's desire to get Trump back.

He would love to have Trump. Trump was the health of Twitter. He made that platform. And so Musk is lusting after Trump coming back. Uh, it's not Trump sitting there, uh, enticed by Twitter. It is Musk lusting after Trump. He got the labels mixed up. He should have put the, uh, the, the girl that is there in the pornographic pose should have the Musk label on her while Trump is looking the other way or something. But he also put out over the weekend to justify the poll.

He said, well, Vox Populi, Vox Dei, the voice of the people is a voice of God. And so I'm going to put a poll here and whatever you guys say, I'll do. You know, if you want me to bring guys say, I'll do, you know, if you want me to bring back Trump, I'll bring back Trump. But, uh, you know, this is what the people want. I can't, uh, I can't go against the people. He'll tell these European union bureaucrats and others who are saying things like, um, uh, we will have access to Twitter and your information. We will have control. And people are not going to say rubbish on this platform.

We will control that. Or you're going to pay us a fine equivalent to 6% of your global revenue. You will do what we say. When Musk says the bird is free after he buys Twitter, the same bureaucrat says the bird will fly by our rules. He went to Austin at the beginning of the discussion about the, and I've showed you that clip before, and it's amazing how Musk bows and scrapes

before this European bureaucrat. He's not a free speech absolutist. He wants money. How do you think he got to be the richest man in the world? By doing the bidding of these governments. He's a government agent. He's a deputized government agent. He's a shill for the Green New Deal, the rest of this stuff.

So back to Vox Populi, Vox Dei. Many people, which means the voice of the people is the voice of God. Many people pointed out the context of that. It appeared in a letter from a theologian and an archbishop, Alcuin. I've not heard of this guy before, so I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing his name correctly. Forgive me if I'm not. But this theologian and archbishop wrote this to the Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne in 1798. In the letter, the archbishop says, quote,

And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God. What people would that be? He was talking about Elon Musk back in 798. Anyway, those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voices, the voice of the people is the voice of God. Since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness, right? Uh, the, uh, the madness of crowds and the bubbles, economic bubbles that we see all the time.

So the lead us not into temptation. Below the quote is an image of a monk labeled as Donald Trump praying and trying to ignore a woman labeled as Twitter, attempting to seduce him by lifting up her dress to expose herself to him. So Jordan Peterson, who's newly been reinstated, quoted, uh, replied to that and said, you really are pretty damn funny,

Mr. Musk. Well, he's been a newly reinstated, the great reinstatement, as I said yesterday, uh, he was a newly minted Musk sip of sycophant is a Jordan Peterson.

Truly amazing. Um, so, uh, minted musk sycophant is uh jordan peterson truly amazing um so uh i don't you know jordan peterson used to say um he had this quasi religious moment and all these people say oh he's very close to becoming a christian or maybe he is a christ or whatever. He said, I keep having this dream where all these kings or something about kings rising up out of their graves and they all bow before Jesus. All the great men rising from their graves and bowing to Jesus. Well, maybe it's just indigestion from all that Jungian garbage you've been swallowing and vomiting on everybody else, Jordan. I mean, that's... Anyway, so what did he say? So that was his little pornographic thing. And, you know, with a little Bible verse there,

lead us not into temptation. Then later on, when he was hit up by Sam Harris, the atheist, are you going to actually support free speech? That would mean that you bring back people like Alex Jones. Well, then he replied with another Bible verse. Suffer, little children, and forbid them not to come unto me, for of such is the kingdom of heaven. What does that have to do with unbanning Alex Jones? Well, absolutely nothing. He doesn't

understand what suffer the little children means. He thinks it means suffering little children somehow. I don't know what he thinks that means. Does he understand that in just like he doesn't understand the context of Vox Populi, Vox Dei, he doesn't understand that suffer little children is, you know, old King James English. Everywhere else it'd be translated as let them come or allow them to come. Allow little children to come to me, right? And look at the context of that.

No, just say, oh, I heard somewhere suffer little children. So people are like, what? What does that mean? Well, it means absolutely nothing. Elon Musk. I think about this. I think about, fiddle on the roof. Hevya says, and he says, if I were a rich man, right? I would sit in the gate all day and I would pontificate about things, right? And even if I were a rich man, right, I would sit in the gate all day and I would pontificate about things, right? And even if I didn't know the answer, if you're rich, people think you really know. What was on display the last couple of days is not just, it's just absolute ignorance of somebody who's totally clueless.

He's like some kind of millennial or something, except he's older than millennials. It's crazy. But then he did reply after people said, what is that supposed to mean? He said, my firstborn child died in my arms. I felt his last heartbeat. I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics, or fame. Okay, fair enough. Is he going to then ban Fauci, the CDC, the FDA?

Is he going to ban Pfizer, Moderna, Albert Bourla, Stefan Bonsal? Is he going to ban all those guys? How about the World Health Organization? They use the deaths of children for gain, for politics, and for fame, don't they? They actually kill people. They didn't just use, they kill children for gain, politics, or fame. They don't just use the deaths of children for gain politics or fame. They actually kill people.

So maybe you should start getting busy, uh, banning the pharmakia, um, go in wool world economic forum while you're at it because they're pushing all this stuff. So, uh, yeah,

Musk appears to be enjoying the Twitter fanfare yeah it's an ego trip for him this guy is the new steve jobs because he is so rich and because of tesla and some other things everybody is hanging on every word that he has to say they think he really knows because he's a rich man. Yeah. Your net worth is not your net worth, okay? Don Lemon ridicules thirsty Elon Musk, he says, for sharing sexualized photo of Jesus, according to Mediaite, again, it's not a picture of a rabbi, it's a picture of a monk,

and Twitter, in order to lure Trump. So they said, Musk revealed, this is according to Mediaite, Musk revealed that voters for allowing Trump to return had won the day. And on Sunday evening, he posted a meme of what appeared to be Jesus being tempted by a woman bearing her rear end to him in a hyper sexualized manner well all that is correct except for the that is a hyper sexualized um thing but of course you know from what people are saying and i saw for the first time i mentioned this like a month ago I was searching for a particular event with a hashtag. All of a sudden I got hit with this, um, hardcore porn video that was on there. It's like, Whoa, scroll past that.

And then another one comes up. It's like, okay, we're done. I've never seen that before. Twitter. At live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back

as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie So, you know, if Musk seems to be fine with that, probably. Twitter logo covers her naked derriere while the name Donald Trump is placed over the religious figure. As I said before, it's a crude content and a crude implementation of it, actually. There is a desperate, a desperation aspect to this said Chris lemon. It really seems desperate or what we say in the vernacular.

Now thirst. I'm not familiar with that. Audie Cornish jumped in to explain the image that CNN producers opted not to air. This is a sexualized image that he's posting. And I think it's a really good example of the thirsting that you're talking about, which is look at me, look at me eyes on this advertisers mocking Musk's carnival Barker approach to trying to keep Twitter culturally relevant shortly after purchasing it for $44 billion. Yeah. So, um, um again he misquotes the bible to an atheist to answer a question about free speech restoring free speech uh absolute nonsense uh what this guy is uh

is doing now but you know uh he's on the crosshairs of a lot of people. He's offended them, but, um, he's decided that he will, he will bow to the European union, but he will not bow to God. Right. Uh, the view co-host, uh, Sonny Hostin claims that Jesus would play a major role in the LGBT pride parade. Well, I guess we'll be seeing a meme from her soon incorporating Jesus somehow. I don't think so. You know, throughout the Bible, God, Jesus also, also God, also condemning,

pride of every kind, every kind of pride. That's the one thing. I used to say that. I said, you know, you don't see people holding adultery pride parades until we had Trump. He would parade his adultery, you know, the First Wives Club and all the rest of this stuff in response to that. But other than Donald Trump, nobody would parade their adultery or other sins that they had until we had the LGBT group. Jesus was accused of and was a friend of sinners and tax collectors even, even tax collectors,

because those guys collected taxes on behalf of the Roman government, and they would keep a heavy cut for their own, right? I used that line it went over like a lead balloon when I was running for office because the Republicans are saying hey we need to privatize some tax collection I said well that was tried with a Roman government and now the GOP wants to bring it back. I said, perhaps, you know, these despised publicans of the Roman occupation in Israel there, perhaps we could call this revival of it, perhaps we could call them Republicans. We will privatize tax collection and do it just like the Romans did and create these corrupt, wealthy individuals to do it for us. But, you know, they've got the Green New Deal, so who needs to bring back the idea of publicans?

But getting back to Jesus and what he would do, he would hang out with people who were sinners. No doubt about it. But he wasn't hanging out with them to make them feel comfortable. He hung out with them in order to warn them you know taking example you know Matthew was a tax collector or came he met the woman at the well and he talked to her which in and of itself was pretty amazing because she was Samaritan and the Jews didn't have anything to do with Samaritans.

And that's one of the reasons why Jesus used the illustration of the good Samaritan to try to get past these prejudices and biases of people and to see people as individuals and understand that anybody is capable of doing something to help somebody else. But when he met the Samaritan woman, it was not about making her feel better about herself. She was surprised to see he's obviously not dressed as a monk in the Elon Mustang, but he'd be dressed as a rabbi. He was obviously Jewish.

The Jews would go out of their way to avoid even looking at the Samaritans, who they considered to be subhuman, and had basically adopted a mixture of the Jewish religion and the Syrian religion. In many cases, they might have been of mixed heritage because of that Syrian occupation and so forth. So they would avoid the Samaritans like the plague. And it was not accepted in either culture that a man would talk to a woman, especially a long. And so she was taken back back and so he engages her for a while and um then um she kind of gets a little bit sassy and he says go get your husband she says uh i don't

have a husband he says right you've been married several times and the guy you're living with now is not your husband what does she do at that point? She changes the topic to theology. Let's not talk about my personal sin. No, he was there to make her uncomfortable about her personal sin so that he could help her, so he could give her living water. That well. So that was the purpose and why Jesus would engage people.

It's why he would talk to a Samaritan woman, why he would go into bars, why he would talk to tax collectors of all people. It was to, not to make them comfortable, but to get them to change. Go your way and sin no more, or something worse is going to happen to you after you heal the blind man. Sunny Hostin, though, has invented a Jesus of her own. She's got her own personal Jesus that she's imagined. Her plastic Jesus, she says, would serve as the grand marshal of a pride parade.

He was a friend of sinners, but he did not condone sin. He did not. She says, I don't know that they hide behind religion, because I said on this show once before, Jesus would be the grand marshal at the pride parade. She describes herself as a Catholic, but she said, I really mean that. She went on to say those who take issue with homosexuality are weaponizing religion. She says, I mean, in every argument, we weaponize religion.

No, it's just the opposite, Sonny, as I said with the woman at the well. You use religion to avoid your obvious rebellion to God and to make yourself feel better about it. Well, you know, I may be thumbing my nose at God, but, you know, I've got this one little thing. Just like the woman at the well says, well, you choose, you know, worship God in Jerusalem. We worship him in Mount Gerizim or whatever, right? Well, let's talk about theology. Let's not talk about this long list of people I've shacked up with. Let's not talk about that.

And many people will use religion that way to make themselves feel superior to other people. But Jesus doesn't do religion. He does relationships to stop your rebellion. So Whoopi Goldberg jumped in, and she said, authentic Christians would recognize and celebrate all people as made in God's image regardless of their sexual orientation or identity. And you see, that's the key thing.

Celebrate. I've said for the longest time, they don't want toleration. They don't want you to tolerate what they do. As Christians, we're not interested in forcing you to stop your rebellion to God. What's the point of that? There's no point in that. I'm not interested in locking somebody up because they're homosexual. I'm not interested in cutting their head off like they do in Saudi Arabia

because they're homosexual. Right? I'm not interested in any of that. But I do want to help them to avoid eternal damnation and it's a loving thing to tell them about that just like as i said for the longest time with these pastors who were pushing people to get the vaccine oh love your neighbor get the vaccine i said no loving your neighbor is to warn them about the consequences of this. The same way that you talk to people when they don't want to hear it about Christ because you want to warn them about the consequences of rebellion.

So we do not, you know, we tolerate politically and legally what they do. We don't tolerate the behavior by accepting it. And we certainly aren't going to bow down and celebrate it, which is what they're going to try to do to us. That's the whole point of this Respect for Marriage Act and everything else that the Biden administration has been doing with the LGBT. They want to force you to bow the knee to their practices, to their religion, because it has become a religion for them. So, yeah, the problem is they have no idea. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie No idea. Well, this is what an authentic Christian would do. They have no idea why Christ came. He gave his life for their rebellion, to ransom them from hell.

They despise that by acting this way. So that's right. Jesus, my son says, didn't come to bring peace to the world, but a sword. There is going to be division over that. And he said, you know, we're going to be hated if we follow him because the world hates him. This time of year at Christmas time, we talk about peace on earth. He didn't bring peace between people. He came here to bring peace between God and man because man long ago, each and every one of us has rebelled against God, if we're honest with ourselves, in many different ways.

And so he came to make that peace. So while we're talking about Christmas, Tim Allen has now got, and this is, it's a series. They're doing like, you know, he did the Santa Claus movies and stuff going back into the 1990s. And so now, I guess this whole Santa Claus thing is where Tim Allen is going to go to infinity and beyond or something. Good run for light years. Uh, this is now going to be a series on Disney because, you know, they've created this Disney plus thing. It's become this voracious time hole that they have to stuff stuff in big black hole of time. We got to put programming in it.

You know, you have 500 channels, nothing to watch, but they're just throwing everything they can at it to try to fill the space. But I'm not saying that it's bad. I haven't seen it. I like Tim Allen. Uh, you know, it seems like a really nice guy, but he got in trouble because, and this is a TV series of, um, it's called the Santa clauses. And so it's Mr.

And Mrs. Santa Claus. So it's going. And Mrs. Santa Claus. So it's going to be a Santa Claus sitcom. That's going to run for a long time, I guess, throughout the year or something. I guess it's, um, going to be like the monsters of the Adams family or something like that. Which didn't just run Halloween that ran all year. So it'll be Christmas all year on Disney Plus with the Santa Clauses. And he got in trouble simply because there was a line in there where Santa Claus was saying,

you know, I can't even say Merry Christmas anymore without getting people mad at me. And then people got mad at him. Just to prove the point. A quick line in Tim Allen's new Disney plus series. The Santa Claus is, is reportedly drawing the ire of some internet critics. Uh, so he did three Santa Claus films from 1994 through 2006. And,

um, he's an outspoken conservative, which got him booted off of the buzz light year remake. I think. Many people believe that happened. They used Chris Evans. And, of course, they wanted to make the new Buzz Lightyear thing, they wanted to make it Buzz LGBT Year, which is what they did with it.

He was also, because he was outspoken politically about his conservative political beliefs many people believe that's what got him canceled his show last man standing uh canceled by abc which is disney right so now disney is going to give him another shot at the santa claus's uh alan's but now not without controversy alan's character is asked his santa claus characters, what's bothering him? And Santa says, saying Merry Christmas to all has suddenly become problematic. And then it became problematic on Twitter. The dialogue immediately caused a Twitter uproar. Filmmaker Scott Weinberg called out the inclusion of the line,

tweeting about how he found it strange to include this in a kids series because we all know that what should be in kids series right now are drag queens and grooming sexual grooming for lgbt why in your world are you putting something in there saying sing merry christmas has suddenly become problematic why would you put that in a kids show we all know the kids show should all be about LGBT grooming. It just struck me as truly weird to put that in a kid's series. Then somebody who says that he's professional Santa. Don't know if he is or not.

He says as a professional Santa, I know that's bull. The biggest problem is right wing pundits claiming that you can't say Merry Christmas, uh, decorations and songs are being banned. problem is right-wing pundits claiming that you can't say Merry Christmas. Uh, decorations and songs are being banned. He says, I spent a chunk of my time as Santa and, um, calming down people who think that Christmas is being taken away from them. It's cruel. Um, I don't believe that, but you know, I think probably what we want to do is, um, we should bring back. Was it the year without Santa Claus?

Was that the one when they had heat miser and snow miser and stuff? I don't, we don't, he doesn't know either. Neither one of us know. Maybe, you know, you can send me a letter. But the, when you look at one of these things was about the fact that there was no snow, no snow, and that's the thing that they should be making a series out of, you know, how, how Christmas is canceled because of global warming and climate change, because that's really what the kids should be consuming.

They should be learning all the time, every day in every way about the LGBT agenda and about the climate change agenda. So let's forget about the Santa clauses and let's bring back the year without Santa Claus, the year without snow. There was another moment in the show's premiere episodes that sparked some attention when the elves began to question whether a, quote, naughty or nice list was appropriate to use in light of the current cultural trends. Of course, we don't want to label people as naughty or nice, right? There is no such thing as good or bad because now we're under postmodernism. There is no absolute truth. There's no standard to judge people by. So there is no naughty or nice list, right?

Come on, let's get over it. Uh, even SBF, Sam Bankman freed or Bankman fried or Bankman Fetterman or whatever. Yeah. SBF, his mom wrote the op-ed piece. I pointed out yesterday, Chris, uh, uh, he had a Mauer pointing that out, uh, beyond blame. Let's not blame anybody for anything. There is no naughty or nice list. And when you get rid of that, you wind up with monsters like SBF, raised by his mother, who thinks that there's no individual responsibility for anything. We shouldn't blame anybody for anything. So what's this deal about naughty or nice? But we do have people who are naughty or nice. They're just not naughty or nice based on their behavior.

They're naughty or nice based on their skin color or on their gender or on their religion, but not on anything that they actually do. So let's get rid of this naughty or nice list here. So the director says, yeah, you know, we talked about whether we should get rid of that naughty or nice list.

And so what we're trying to figure out like we're picking this story up 16 years after everybody last left it so things have changed in the world should we be talking about a naughty or nice list says the director the naughty or nice list would probably be looked at very differently this time around versus when everything was black and white. When we understood what was right and wrong, naughty and nice. We don't have that anymore. So at least the director knows that, but he's going to bow, bow to that as well. Uh, John Leguizamo.

Is that how you pronounce this guy's name? This non-actor. I think he was, yeah. He doesn't know either. We're woefully inadequate when it comes to Hollywood. Even worse when it comes to sports. I don't even know the names of the teams when it comes to sports. Anyway, this guy, John Leguizamo.

I think he was a voice of a parrot or something in a Disney thing, I think. I'm digging here. Happy Indigenous Survivors Day, he said. On where else? Twitter. And then he says, F Thanksgiving. Well, I imagine he can probably find something to be thankful for because he's got a, um, he's, he's, um, healthy, you know, um, all of his limbs are working. He's got his mouth is working. He can type on Twitter.

Uh, he's presumably got a career. Maybe he doesn't. I don't know. Maybe that's what he's upset about. Uh, early this month, he whined about Hollywood casting non-Latino actors in the roles of Latino characters, such as Al Pacino, who is Italian, in the role of a Puerto Rican gangster. Yeah, I guess he might have also been upset, thinking that that line, say hello to my lethal friend, was talking about Leguizamo. He said, you had Al Pacino and tan makeup, coked up and wild as a Cuban in Scarface. The studios loved it so much they put him in Carlito's way as a Puerto Rican from Spanish Harlem. Well, Leguizamo omitted the fact that he, a Colombian-born actor, played an Italian-American character in movies such as The Summer of Sam and Super Mario Brothers.

See, that's the problem. If you're only going to allow people, you can't play a role unless you really are that. Well, then it's not acting. You know, that's what people used to complain about with John Wayne. They said, he's not an actor. He's a character. He's the same character and everything. Even if he's in The Greatest Story ever told, I think is what it was.

Or they had him as a Roman centurion, you know, just because they wanted to get every star they could think of in the movie. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie They dressed him up as a Roman centurion, put him up against a board.

They didn't even bother to put a piece of background. And they had, surely he was a son of God, you know. He didn't even make the effort to try to be a Roman soldier, you know, because a Roman soldier would have spoken in a British accent. Right. Um, he couldn't even give it that much of an effort. He was a character. He always was John Wayne, whatever he was in.

Right. And the problem for this guy, like was Amo is that if, um, if he wants to be authentic, and everybody has to be authentic, and they get really upset if somebody plays an LGBT character and they're straight. If you could find somebody who's straight in Hollywood, you put them in that role. Let them actually act. But you have LGBT characters who are playing straight people all the time, and you have Leguizamoamo who i think voiced a parrot once so you know we can't do any acting but if you're going to play that game

then you know he would only be able to act in parts where there is a colombian character so it's kind of going to limit his career there uh which maybe should be limited. Over the weekend, when we're talking about religion, culture, The Chosen, which is a Christian series, this is something that was crowdsourced and put out for a couple of seasons. But then the third season, when they opened it up, the first two episodes of the third season, they put it on the big screen for a premiere on Friday. So the first two seasons they did as a crowdsource thing.

And then the third season, they put it up on the big screen. Had a five-day theatrical release and more than 2,000 theaters worldwide. You typically don't get that wide a release for a small Christian film or something like that. And, you know, perhaps this is something that maybe Elon Musk and the people of The View could consider watching a couple of episodes. It might help them to get an overview of what Christianity, it's kind of like Christianity 101 or something. They could kind of, you know, get a feel for it. It might even help Elon Musk with his future memes.

But the interesting thing about it is that it made an estimated $10 million, which, you know, would have been chicken feed back in the day with big budget films. But that was only on a five-day release. And it turned out to be number three in the box office. And it had a bigger box office than Warner Brothers' Black Adam, which was not its premiere weekend, or Universal Pictures' Ticket to Paradise. But it also beat She Said, which is a film about the Me Too movement and Harvey Weinstein and stuff, which I think is a healthy sign.

People would rather see a movie about Jesus than about Harvey Weinstein. It kind of surprises me. In our culture today, I would have thought it had been the other way around. That's a hopeful sign. So it began entirely as a crowdfunded series and then was number three at the box office this weekend. So let me just finish this up before we go to break. We have Thanksgiving coming up and people like john leguizamo don't understand what it's really about

it's not about western imperialism it's not about colonialism it's not about that it's about thanking god and uh this article that was um on actually, a Drudge Report, I think, because it's from StudyFinds. He picks up stuff from StudyFinds.org a lot. But I thought it was interesting. When trust is not broken, the average person has five people that they can truly lean on for anything. And so you think about that for Thanksgiving.

And if you've got people that you can lean on for anything, lean into that relationship. You know, we'd see all these articles, oh, people aren't going to do Thanksgiving this year because, you know, they can't afford the turkey and they can't afford this and that. They're going to spend less money on Christmas presents, all this kind of stuff. Fine. That isn't what any of it's about anyway. Lean in to the relationship, and especially your relationship to God. Be thankful to God for the providence. I'm going to talk about that on the Thanksgiving program, what the real lesson of Thanksgiving is.

You know, there's a lot of different lessons that we can take out of life, out of events, out of history. John Leguizamo, whatever his name is, got the wrong lesson out of Thanksgiving. A lot of people picked up another lesson out of Thanksgiving, which is, you know, well, private property and capitalism works better than socialism, that type of thing, and that is a lesson that is there. But that's not the real lesson. The real lesson is about relationships.

The real lesson is about how God deals with us through hardship. Like that. Something just crashed. And lightning struck when I said hardship. Anyway, uh, it turns out the average American, it's five people in their life that have a very strong relationship with them that they can lean on for anything. Now that thing, by the way, that was leaning on something, it just crashed. Seven out of 10 people are feeling more thankful for the people in their life this year than ever before.

Why is that? Well, I think it's because of hardship. And I think that is the lesson, key lesson, about what happened with the Thanksgiving story. The hardship that people had. And God used that. God put people through difficult times so that they would have a better relationship with him by leaning into that relationship. And so whether you're talking about your relationship with people or your relationship with God, that is a silver lining in terms of the times that we are coming into. So they said they're looking for someone who is trustworthy, 48%, a good listener, 41%, or somebody who is loyal, 33%. Well, you can find all of those in Christ.

We will be right back. Thank you. you're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, let's look at a lawsuit that has been filed against the FDA. It's been filed by the Alliance Defending Freedom, ADF, a public interest law firm. It's the first lawsuit of its kind, and they have sued the Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, for claiming for decades that the agency had operated outside of its legal boundaries. There's no authority for them in the Constitution. But yeah, let's just forget about the constitutional authority for the FDA to exist for a moment. But even the other secondary tertiary rules, after we get rid of the Constitution, they don't follow them either. That's the problem. Once you decide

that you're going to thumb your nose at the Constitution, all bets are off. They're not going to obey the law either. So they failed to protect young pregnant women and ignored science in favor of politics. You mean the FDA? The FDA put politics over science? Say it ain't so. The FDA failed Americans, women, and girls when it chose politics over science

and approved chemical abortion drugs for use in the United States. The use of RU-486 was successfully blocked by pro-life groups for years after it was developed in France. But during the Clinton administration, then-President Bill Clinton instructed the FDA to promote the testing, the licensing for profit, and the manufacture of the drug. So who would have thought that they would do something like that? You know, it's interesting to go back and look at the FDA. Created in 1906. They didn't have the same name that I believe, but it was created in 1906.

Just like the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. There's no constitutional authority for either one of those institutions. But look at how they have altered our society. The extent to which these unconstitutional organizations, like the FDA, like the Federal Reserve, like the FBI, like the CDC, these things that did not exist until the 20th century. Look at the damage that they've done to our society. Look at how they have undone the American Republic.

Turned it into a bureaucratic, despotic empire. So anyway, this led to the French pharmaceutical company that held the patent on the life-ending drug to donate it for free. I'm reading from, this is the New American, newamerican.com. This led to the French pharmaceutical company that held the patent on the life-ending drug to donate it for free to who? At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie To the Rockefeller Foundation. Whoa. Actually, it's something that they sponsored called Population Council. So you mean the Rockefeller Foundation, which has been from the very beginning, all about subverting our medical system?

And they're also about depopulation. Oh, yeah, that Rockefeller Foundation. By September 2000, the FDA had approved the council's application, the Depopulation Council. And abortion by ingesting poisonous chemicals became legal in the United States. This lawsuit from Alliance Defending Freedom, ADF, reminds the U.S. District Court where it was filed that the only way the FDA was able to approve the drug was to lie.

Oh, that sounds familiar, doesn't it? The only way they were able to approve these vaccines was to lie. The only way they were able, and that's the approval process. The only way they were able to, and that's the approval process. That was a big lie. Yeah, we got Corminati and we have the Pfizer BioNTech. They are legally distinct, but we're going to say that we're going to approve the one that's not available. And we're going to mandate for the military and for everybody else that you take the one that we didn't approve. Legally distinct.

We didn't approve it. But that's the one that you're going to be mandated to take. Everything the FDA has done this last year. And one of the worst, most obvious lies ever. But it's good to get them on some of the other lies that they've been doing because it's not just limited to that. This is what they say in the lawsuit. The only way the FDA could have approved chemical abortion drugs was to use its accelerated drug approval authority, necessitating the FDA to call pregnancy an illness. They labeled pregnancy a disease, an illness. The FDA, the lying FDA, the FDA that has prostituted itself to the pharmaceutical industry.

And then they argued that these dangerous drugs provide a, quote, meaningful therapeutic benefit to stop this illness of pregnancy. So they said that it's a meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments to that illness of pregnancy. Pregnancy is not an illness, says the lawsuit, nor do chemical abortion drugs provide a therapeutic benefit over surgical abortion. In asserting these transparently false conclusions, the FDA exceeded its regulatory authority to approve drugs. What's more, says the lawsuit, the FDA needed to disavow science and the law because the FDA never studied the safety of the drugs under the

labeled conditions of use, despite being required to do so by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which supposedly gave them their authority, but also gave them limitations. Just like the Trump shot. They disavowed science. They disavowed the law. They disavowed the act that gave them the authority. They disavowed their own rules. And they never studied the safety issue whatsoever.

They did it for love. They did it for the love of big pharmaceutical companies. It's just, just cut them a break, you know. The FDA knew then and knows now that the administering RU486 has a complication rate that is four times higher than surgical abortions. one in five pregnant women who use the chemical to force the abortion of her living child will suffer complications requiring further medical attention, perhaps facing severe vaginal bleeding, life-threatening infection, and or becoming sterile, often requiring a blood transfusion, followed by a hysterectomy. Yeah.

Abby Johnson, who worked for Planned Parenthood, now has become a big opponent of the abortion industry, talked about her experience having a chemical abortion like this. I don't know if it's RU486, something like that. The abortifacient chemical. I don't know which one it was. But she talked about how it nearly killed her. It was horrific. But of course it's something put out by the Rockefeller Population Control Council.

The lawsuit claims the FDA knew all of these things and approved the drug anyway. You mean like this conspiracy that they had going with Pfizer to know all these different things that we're now finding out and to cover it up and to keep the documents that were being passed back and forth between Pfizer and the FDA to keep that hidden for 65, 70 years, whatever the number was.

I forget now. Yeah, keep it hidden like the JFK assassination. Cowing to political pressure from the White House. Yeah, there was no political pressure from the White House, was there? Trump bragged over and over again about how he pressured them to get rid of any delay. Don't delay this. Don't do any safety studies. Don't do anything. You know, don't do any safety studies. Don't do anything.

You've got to get this stuff out. Why? So he could brag about it? Or did he have another agenda from his masters? Who was Trump working for? It wasn't the American people. It was either himself or somebody else. Who was he working for?

Same MO. Whether you're talking about Bill Clinton or Donald else. Who was he working for? Same M.O. Whether you're talking about Bill Clinton or Donald Trump. Isn't that interesting? We had a choice. Clinton or Trump. Clinton or Trump. You get the same thing. When you're talking about killing people.

When you're talking about the FDA. When you're talking about pushing through drugs that have never been tested. So the pharmaceutical company can make a killing. Literally. Trump or Clinton? Trump or Clinton? Take your pick. No evidence that the Freedom Convoy donations were from criminal organizations.

This is testimony that is now, as people are looking at this, um, uh, they, they brought in GoFundMe. Now you remember this, you know, people were funding the trucker protest, the freedom convoy, because there's a lot of people besides truckers that were involved in it, but it's truckers who kicked it off. And so people started contributing to it. And, um, uh, Trudeau hijacked, uh, got GoFundMe to confiscate funds and other things like that. Gave people a first taste of what it's going to be like when they weaponize the banking system against us.

Justin Trudeau, hiding out, didn't want to talk to people. And he also said this. Regardless of the fact that we are attacking your fundamental rights or limiting your fundamental rights, and the charter says that's wrong, we're still going to go ahead and do with it. It's basically a loophole that allows a majority to override fundamental rights of a minority. Yeah. Well, that's why you have the charter of rights, isn't it, Justin? Because the majority is always going to try to overwrite, overrule the rights of the minority.

Two wolves and a sheep, what's for dinner? So we're going to do that. Yeah, the charter says this, but we're going to do it anyway. Uh, we don't really care. Yeah. It's the two wolves and the sheep claws of the charter. It's right there at the very end. These scribble that in with some graffiti. It's my son's. Uh, there's no evidence suggesting that any of the funds raised for the freedom convoy protests through the platform were illegal or were acquired through criminal means. And that was the lie that he was pushing as well. You know, he did come out and say, yeah, we're going to do all kinds of stuff to you that

we don't have the authority to do, but we have power to do it. So conservative MP Larry Brock asked GoFundMe general Counsel Kim Wilford if she agreed that there was no evidence that any of the funds originating to your platform were proceeds of crime. And so the general counsel from GoFundMe said that is correct. There was none of this as a product of crime. Trudeau said in the House of Commons on February the 9th that there was, and that trial just happened on November the 18th, so that was on Friday. February the 9th, Trudeau said there was, quote, a flow of funds through criminal activities, unquote, being sent to the convoy.

And so he said, these funds are coming from criminal activity, so we can confiscate the funds. So they bring in GoFundMe, said, was there any evidence of any? No, there was no evidence of any criminal activity. Just over a week after February the 9th, Trudeau told the House that the convoy was being heavily supported by individuals in the United States and from elsewhere around the world. We see that roughly half of the funding that is flowing to the barricaders here is coming from the United States, he said. And so again, in testimony, the conservative MP asks the GoFundMe representative on Friday.

She said 88% of the funds donated to the convoy through GoFundMe originated in Canada. 88%. Trump, not Trump. Yeah, it's hard to tell Trump from Trudeau, actually. One is older than the other one, that's right. But both globalist puppets. Note, it was Trudeau who said, remember, roughly half of the funding is coming from the United States. She said, no, 88% came from Canada.

86 of the top donors were from Canada. The Convoy's fundraising page raised over $10 million before GoFundMe removed it on February the 4th on the grounds that it violated their service terms. And so now these conservative MPs are saying, well, we've got some questions for you. So Wilford, the lawyer for GoFundMe, confirmed that of the total 133,000 donors who gave to the fundraiser, only 18,000 originated from outside of canada

with 14 000 of that total coming from the united states so 88 from canada and of the remaining ones um you know 14 000 out of 18 000 from the united, a very small minority. A CBC broadcasting host had said on January the 28th, before they told GoFundMe to lock this stuff up, a CBC broadcasting host said on January the 28th that there was concern that Russian actors could be continuing to fuel things. So it's coming from Russia, The usual boogeyman. Russia is Russia.

I think it's Russia. There wasn't any money coming from Russia, said the GoFundMe representative. There was no money coming from Russia. There was no money coming from China. There was less than 10% coming from the United States, even though Trudeau said it was more than half. This was coming from Canadians not involved in a criminal activity because they were protesting

the criminal actions of Justin Trudeau. The only criminal in this whole thing was Justin Trudeau. You are the man. So that's an interesting follow-up to that. Trudeau, on the other hand, is now insisting that, you know, when they knew that Russia and China and the United States were funding this thing against him, he knew that.

But now there are accusations that China was actually funding Canadian candidates. He claims that he doesn't know anything about that. Funny how he knew everything about where all the money to GoFundMe was coming from and how that was all a lie. And yet he doesn't know anything about the Chinese government giving money to Canadian politicians who then pass it on to other people. For the 2019 federal election, no idea that China was funding candidates, but he knew that Russia, China, and U.S. were funding the trucker protests. Everything he knows, everything that he says that he knows, is a lie, because he is a liar.

So, I don't know, you know, maybe, what would they want? What could China possibly want from Canada? Well, I know that they modeled the lockdown for the world. I know that, you know, Trudeau just idolizes Chinese communists. He said that when asked, they said that what country other than your own course, of course you would say Canada, but other than Canada, what country do you most admire? Oh, China, because they can do whatever they wish to stop climate change.

They can act like a dictator. Well, I just played for you the fact They can act like a dictator. Well, I just played for you the fact that he acted like a dictator. Yeah, I know the Charter for Freedom says this, but, you know, we're going to do this anyway. Don't care. I'm a dictator now. Trudeau has denied receiving any information on federal election candidates who allegedly received financial backing from China during the 2019 federal election candidates who allegedly received financial backing from China during the 2019

federal election. I do not have any information, nor have I been briefed on any federal candidates receiving any money from China, he said. Global News reported the intelligence memos, cautioned Trudeau, and several unidentified members, the China's consulate in Toronto had organized an election interference network in 2019. Global News is the establishment news in Canada. The intelligence says that Global News, the intelligence said that the consulate earmarked a significant sum, which was transferred to an unidentified federal campaign staffer who then sent the sum to an unnamed Ontario member of parliament.

Separate sources with knowledge of the 2022 briefs told Global News that this elected official subsequently disbursed that amount to other members of the network, which included at least 11 unidentified candidates and 13 campaign staff. Conservatives have since called on Trudeau to publicly name the 11 candidates believed to have taken Chinese funds for their campaigns. Well, why would he want to do that? It's probably some of his friends, right? Could even be him. Who knows?

Trudeau says, told Global News in Canada, I've asked them to give all information that they can share, that they can with a parliamentary committee looking into it. Again, let me be very clear. I have no information. No information that he'll give anybody. Well, China has announced their very first COVID-19 death since May. An 87-year-old man died with a positive COVID test.

87-year-old man. They haven't had a, what have they been doing? They've locked down Shanghai. They've locked down parts of Beijing. They've locked down, I've lost count of how many, tens of millions of people have been locked down under horrific conditions since May for the last six months. And I said, if there was anybody that they could even try to, they're not even trying

to make a case that anybody's dying from this stuff. Think about all the tens of millions of people that they locked down. Uh, the report that I had, uh, last week or a week before of a Western journalist who was kidnapped and sent to a FEMA camp, essentially. Talked about the conditions there, not because he tested positive, but because somebody who tested positive, who was not sick, had been in proximity to him because they knew that through the phones

and geospatial intelligence. So an 87-year-old man died, but they are pulling back on some of this zero COVID lockdown because they've now had two toddlers who have died. Toddlers who died because the hospitals refused to give them any medical care because of COVID lockdown rules. And the Chinese people are furious and rightfully so about that.

So we've had one 87-year-old die, they said, of COVID. Who knows what other comorbidities he had besides age. And then toddlers who are perfectly fine had an accident, one of them exposed to carbon monoxide. They refused a treatment. You had another case where there was a pregnant woman who could not get treatment because of their COVID zero COVID rules. She had to wait outside for hours in the cold and she had a miscarriage.

Chinese people are angry about this and they should be angry about it. Uh, Andromeda one. Thank you very much for the tip. David, wishing you and your family a very happy Thanksgiving. Thank you very much. We are looking forward to it. And again, we're going to prerecord some stuff.

And we'll have a show that we put together on Thanksgiving. We'll have a best of show with some interviews and things like that for Friday. And there'll be no Rock fan show this Thursday evening. We've moved the rock fan to be on rock fan. I have to do a, um, a live show that is available to people who are rock fan subscribers. If you subscribe on rock fan, you can see all the premium content from any channel.

If you subscribe, if you want to do that, if you subscribe to us, it helps us. But anyway, we had a program that we were airing on Saturday night, and it was getting kind of late. And so, plus I needed a day off. So we've moved that to Thursday evening at 7 p.m., a one-hour show since it's a weeknight. But that is coming on Thanksgiving this week, and so we will not be doing that show this week. By the way, Jason Barker and Angry Tiger have set up a show because so many people, it was a really nice community that came together on a Saturday night and, um, um, you know, a few dozen people who were always there and, um, they got to be friends. And so they've started a,

a program where they call in and talk with each other and share things. And you can find that on Twitter. And I didn't write it down before the program to remember it, but, um, if they want to put that on there as a comment, you don't have to leave a tip to put a comment on there. I'll have my son, uh, mentioned that and we'll tell people where to find that, but they're doing that. They set that up to, uh, occur after the show on Saturday. So, um, there, uh, it's an interesting thing to check out anyway, but just a heads up to them.

I'm going to, I don't know if they want to change that or not, if they want to change it to any other time, uh, you know, that that's fine. They can go back. I'm not going to go back to that.

If they want to keep it on Saturday night at seven o'clock, go for it. Uh, I'm not going to go back to that time. Cause I do need to have a day off. Uh, and also Steven Caspar. Thank you very much for the tip on rock fan.

I appreciate that. Thank you. Uh, they will lock you down again. I've said this over and over again. Now, Jeffrey Tucker, who is with the Brownstone Institute wrote an op-ed piece. They will lock you down again. He says the Lords of lockdown barely escaped their worst possible fate. Namely that the topic would become the national and international source of scandal that it should be. They were starting to get worried.

So they did the op-ed piece in the Atlantic saying, hey, you know, we need to have amnesty. Let's just forgive and forget. Mistakes were made. It was complicated. We didn't know. No, it should have been, as he's pointed out, it should have been such a scandal that we should have had another Nuremberg trial. I'm not going to be happy until that happens.

And we've got to pull back these measures. Of course, that's not even on the agenda of the GOP. Should we stop the executive order that's gone on now for 985 days? Let's not even talk about it. Hey, let's talk about what the Democrats have done. Well, let's make this personal about our opponents. Let's not do anything for the people. Let's not stop the medical martial law. So he goes, yeah,

we can add the vaccine mandates to the lockdown. This is not going to stop. So this is a scandal that conservatives don't want to talk about. The Biden administration has once again extended the COVID emergency declaration another 90 days, or 985 days into it, as I said, and counting. And this is now going to extend it. Biden just extended it yet again. But Republican governors like Abbott have done the same thing. Biden has extended it into January of 2023.

And actually, even though Trump did his executive order that unleashed the money and things like that on March the 13th, 2020, 985 days ago, the HHS emergency done by the former CEO of Eli Lilly that Trump handpicked and put in as head of HHS because he got a big donation from Big Pharma during the transition period, after he talked to RFK Jr., that guy had already declared an emergency in January. So he's going to be extending it to that. So it's going to go at least three years. Under a state of emergency, the constitutional structure of the U.S. is effectively suspended,

says Brownstone Institute. And the country remains on wartime footing. I was hectored and mocked and called a paranoid conspiracy theorist by the Daily Beast, by the ADL, the Anti-Defamation League, for saying that in April of 2020 when it happened. I said, this is medical martial law. And we may not get out of this. Because the Republicans don't even care. It was a Republican, Trump, who put it in.

The Republicans in charge of the House, no, they don't care. They're not going to do anything about it. And, of course, you had Republicans in charge of the Senate when that was done. So you had Republican charge of the Senate and the presidency, and medical martial law was instituted. Nothing was done. So you had Republican charge of the Senate and the presidency and medical martial law was instituted. Nothing was done. This is why I'm not interested in the Republicans at all. Not at all. That's not where the solution is.

They're not the solution. They're the problem. Yeah, government is not the solution. Government is a problem, as Ronald Reagan said. And guess what? The Republican Party, just like the Democrats, is not a solution. It's a problem. So yeah, it was medical martial law, still is. Still is. No conspiracy theory, but it was a conspiracy. Jason Barker, thanks for the mention, David. We are on Twitter at KnightsOTTS. Can I G H T S O T S. Okay.

So on Twitter and, um, right now they're at, uh, 10 o'clock on Saturday, I believe. Um, and, uh, so anyway, you can find them on Twitter. Many colleges and universities such as Harvard still have vaccine mandates. You're not going to be able to rub shoulders with the people in the club unless you take the mark of the beast stuff, right? That's your price of entry into Harvard. The infrastructure is still in place and it's becoming more sophisticated. This infrastructure of medical martial law, says Tucker.

It's hardly a final, not Tucker, it's the Brownstone Institute. Yeah, it is Tucker. Sorry to say, it's Tucker Carlson. Jeffrey Tucker. His last name is Tucker, not his first name. Anyway, he says the infrastructure is still in place and becoming more sophisticated. It is hardly a final victory. It might only be a temporary respite while all the other ambitions are still extant.

I said they haven't hit stop. They hit pause. We are in the eye of the hurricane. And be careful because those backlash wins are some of the worst. He goes on to say, the principle seems to have emerged among the agencies, intellectuals, and politicians who did this. Whatever you do, never admit to having made any major mistakes. And never connect the economic, cultural, health, and educational disasters all around us to anything that the government did in 2020 or 2021,

that would be nothing but a conspiracy theory. The pandemic racket is so huge at this point that it is even embroiled in the FTX meltdown. Well, yeah, it is so huge. This is why we're not going to get these people to pull it back. They've all got exposure, culpability in all this to one degree or the other. And they're going to hang together with each other. You're going to have doctors and hospitals who killed people for money,

money that they were being bribed to kill people with by Donald Trump. Hey, we'll give you a bonus if you put somebody on a ventilator that kills them. We'll give you a bonus if you just do a clinical diagnostic. You don't have to even have a PCR test. We don't have them, and they don't work. That's what the American Hospital Association said. When they didn't pony up the money, they said, you told us from this all start just to do a PCR test. We don't have them and they don't work. That's what the American Hospital Association said. And when they didn't pony up the money, they said, you told us when this all started just to do a clinical diagnosis. You said you didn't have enough tests and they didn't work anyway. Now you're not going to pay us. Come on. Come on. Yeah, here we go. A little John says

nights of the storm, uh, Saturday at 10 Eastern standard time. So the Twitter address is at Knights OTS. We're an online social group that decided to do our own broadcast in order to talk about things we have in common and shows that we frequently watch. So check them out. They're on Saturdays

at 10 PM Eastern Time. Anybody seriously concerned about the future of humanity and the civilizations that it built must throw themselves into the long-term battle for truth and reason, says Jeffrey Tucker. That will require that we use every bit of what remains of free speech. That's what these guys at Knight's OTS are doing, right? Everybody get in, use whatever you got that's left of free speech.

Do it anywhere you can. We got to use what little bit remains of free speech and what remains of the longing for integrity and accountability in public life. The group that we have come to call they want a demoralized population and they want a silent public square. We cannot allow that to happen. Cannot allow that to happen. Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Jody, thank you for the tip. Thank you for being a voice of sanity in an insane world, David.

Thanksgiving blessings to you and your family. Thank you very much, Jody. I appreciate that. Let's talk a little bit about war and the state of it. GOP Representative Stewart says, We need a strategy for Ukraine so we don't have another 20-year quagmire. We don't know what victory is. Here's the problem.

This is Chris Stewart, Republican from Utah. We need to have a strategy so we don't have another 20-year quagmire where we haven't even defined what victory is going to be. Problem is, that is the plan. The plan is to have another 20-year quagmire. That's the plan. That is the plan. It's right out there. Republicans in Congress, he said, want to support Ukraine. Why? What is our dog in this fight? We never tried for peace for eight years.

We didn't care about war that was going on domestically there. Republicans didn't care that the Obama administration and Democrats had organized a coup. The Republicans didn't go on offense and show that the real collusion was not between Trump and Russia, but it was between the DNC and Ukraine in the 2016 election. That was where the real collusion was. So why do they care about Ukraine? They didn't care about it in 2016 when it was a united front between Ukraine and Alexandra Chalupa, the DNC, and all these people. I interviewed people from Ukraine at the time, talking about how the DNC, Alexandra Chalupa,

was there all the time working with these corrupt people, talking about how the Obama administration had kicked off the coup that started a civil war and how these areas of Ukraine had been under constant bombardment for eight years. Republicans didn't care about that. Democrats wanted that. Republicans didn't care about it. So why do Republicans care about Ukraine? So they want to know what the plan is

now after eight years of this, you don't understand what the plan is. You don't understand the plan is to keep this going. You don't understand the plan is to eventually have a war. And you say that you want to support this, but you've got to know what the end point is. I've got to know what you're thinking, pal. This is beyond belief. Do you really expect us to believe that you're that stupid? What are you trying to pull? We also have to learn lessons from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and apply them to Ukraine,

and we need to know what the strategy and the goals are so we don't put ourselves in another 20-year quagmire where we have no idea what victory or defeat actually means. Yeah, we never defined that, did we? Here's what victory means. Here's what war means. War means, according to the Christian theory of justified war, a just war, it means that you don't go to war unless somebody attacks you.

And if you do go to war, the objective is to end it as quickly as possible to try to stop the shedding of blood of soldiers on both sides. And as soon as the hostility towards you has stopped, you stop the war. The same thing as if somebody breaks into your house and they're coming at you, you can use force against them. If they grab your TV, on the other hand, and are running out the door, you can't shoot them in the back. Those are the moral principles, the same moral principles that guide you and how you interact with an act of aggression in your home also guide us with how we act with an act of aggression in our country. This is not an an act of aggression in our country.

This is not an act that is happening in our country. It's not our business. We shouldn't be involved. And of course, to try to minimize that and to make sure that you are following rules that justify war, you have a vote by your democratically elected individuals about whether or not there should be a war. People wear uniforms so that you can identify the combatants from the noncombatants because you're also trying to minimize noncombatant casualties. All these different rules. That's why Western civilization soldiers from countries that were based in Christianity,

why they would wear, the Christian nations, why they would wear uniforms, and why the people that we fight in so many of these countries don't. You're trying to eliminate civilian casualties. As we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan, the people who were there would many times set up and use civilians as shields. We're not supposed to do that. We're also not supposed to start wars. We're also not supposed to act preemptively.

That used to be referred to as infamy. It was infamy when Japan escalated World War II and attacked Pearl Harbor. That was a day of infamy. And now we've had decades of infamy done by the American Empire after World War II. Republicans in Congress want to support this effort, but we don't want to put ourselves in another 20-year quagmire. Why do you want to support it? Maybe the Republicans should get together and say, what justifies this war?

Deputy of NATO ally Turkey says that the U.S. wants to prolong the Ukraine war for its own benefit. Bingo. Sometimes we have to go to somebody who's not all that friendly to the U.S. to tell us the truth. It's for our own benefit, but it's not actually for America's benefit. It's for the military industrial complex's benefit. This guy who is a deputy of Erdogan in Turkey said, this war is not between Russia and Ukraine. It is a war between Russia and the West. The USA and some countries in Europe are starting a process of prolonging this war by supporting Ukraine.

What we want is an end to this war. Someone is trying not to end the war. You see, when we talk about a justified war, it's wrong to preemptively attack somebody. And so, you know, that's the whole discussion as to, well, who started this, right? Why do we have that discussion? Every one of these things. Did this war start with a civil war, you know, that came about with a coup?

Or did this Ukraine war start when Putin sent troops into Ukraine? See, it matters. Why does it matter to people to have this argument? Because everybody knows that it's important to establish who is acting in a criminal way. The morality of this is still understood by both sides, even though they don't explicitly acknowledge it. They understand that if you preemptively attacked, that's the issue. So some people say that it began with a coup. It began with the preemptive attack against civilian areas by the newly installed Ukraine government that was installed by Obama and company eight years ago. Some people say it was started when Putin invaded. But it matters to have that

discussion because that is about the moral high ground. Who is acting right in this war? But it's also equally important to understand that if you're trying to prolong war, that that is an immoral act. You want to try to stop war as soon as possible. That's something we don't even have to explain. Everybody understands intuitively. You know, there's a difference between natural law, which everybody understands, right? You understand that theft is wrong.

You understand that murder is wrong. You do wind up sometimes with degenerate societies where they accept cannibalism and human sacrifice, or they don't have property rights and things like that. But in general, people understand, you know, don't kill, don't steal, that type of stuff, right? Don't murder. And people understand intuitively what's going on with war. You don't want to have war. War is bad. It kills people. It breaks things. So you want to end it. You don't want to have it unless it is necessary to stop killing. And so for all those reasons, it is just as evil to have a design to not end a war as it is to start a war preemptively. And see, the American government has started preemptive war after preemptive war,

and we have kept these things going over and over. I've talked many times about how George Bush had a couple of wars that he started, passed them on to Obama. He kept those going, and he added some more wars. And we're going around the world seeking places where we can join in the fight. And we can get involved in every war, everywhere, and keep them going all the time. We don't ever want to end a war. We didn't want to end Afghanistan.

We were kicked out. So the Turkish deputy there says, there are those who want this war to continue. There are those who want this war to continue. There are those who want this war to continue. The continuation of this war reveals a new process for the USA. The US sees the prolongation of this war as its own benefit. Putin and Zelensky were going to sign a deal, but they said, hey, we don't want to do that. They're telling you the truth. That's what the Biden administration did And so you have Ukrainians who are freezing

Left without water Left without electricity Without heating According to the mayor of Kiev This is what is happening now As the infrastructure is being rapidly destroyed by cruise missiles before the winter. As I said earlier, all these people who want this war to keep going, why is it?

For money, right? The Pentagon, as I said, has failed its fifth consecutive audit. As people are saying, we'd like to know where all this money that's being sent to Ukraine is going. We've already sent them in just the first nine months of this war, we've already sent them more money than the annual budget of Russia.

Where is that going? Can we get some accounting of that? Well, it turns out no. Amid concerns about the lack of oversight for U.S. arms pouring into Ukraine, the Pentagon's comptroller said that the department has failed a fifth consecutive audit. They began doing financial audits in 2017, and they failed that one, and they've failed every single one since then.

The audit of the Pentagon's $3.5 trillion in assets and $3.7 trillion in liabilities concluded that the department's internal tracking of money and arms is still not good enough for a passing grade. Pentagon officials have said that they hope to pass their first audit by 2027. How about that? They've got a five-year plan, just like a communist country, to finally be able to pass their audit. They better be careful. You know, the last time somebody audited the Pentagon, they wound up with a missile flying through there, or an airplane, depending on which

narrative you believe, right? Flying through their window. I've told that story before. I was absolutely amazed. I didn't want to stop her from talking by pulling out my phone to record it. This lady who had retired was talking about why she and her husband were running this little souvenir shop down in Texas. She said, yeah, I got out, you know, we, we had all of these high ranking officials in the military and these high ranking politicians who are retiring. That was their option to get out and not be prosecuted for theft. There were trillions of dollars missing and now they've had a five years and they can't get an audit. Uh, can we get the same five year

deal if we're being audited by some of the new IRS agent army? That's what my son says. Yeah. I, yeah, I don't think so. You know, the other, the excuse that the government has like, Oh, we lost it. The dog ate my homework or something that doesn't fly when you get audited by the IRS army or no army of IRS agents that never flies. But of course for them, it does. Yeah. We lost it.

I must've had it on Hunter's laptop or something. Uh, there is, that's probably the most secure place to put anything, right? No, everybody, nobody will see anything that's on Hunter's laptop or something. Uh, there is, that's probably the most secure place to put anything, right? No, everybody, nobody will see anything that's on Hunter's laptop. It's going to just disappear. The best black hole in the universe. It's like a portable black hole from the Warner brothers thing that the Martian was running around. You know, that's the Hunter laptop.

You put it on that thing and it disappears forever. Uh, there's very little oversight of the weapons once they are shipped to Ukraine. No, really? The State Department recently announced some oversight measures after over eight months of pouring billions of dollars of weapons, tens of billions of dollars of weapons into the country. So Pentagon has no idea. Not only do they not know where the stuff is that they just sent to Ukraine

and that they're sending to Ukraine. They don't know where that stuff is. Of course, they don't know how much they actually left behind in Afghanistan either. So they don't know what they left in Afghanistan. They don't know what they're sending to Ukraine. But hey, we're going to do it forever. Ever. That's what the empire thinks. They think that they're going to be able to hey, we're going to do it forever. Ever. That's what the empire thinks.

They think that they're going to be able to run this Ponzi scheme forever. We're not ever going to have a successful audit of the Pentagon, just like we're never going to have a successful audit of the Fed, Federal Reserve. It's been more than a year since the U.S. military's chaotic withdrawal from Kabul. And while a previous Pentagon inspector general report in August estimated that roughly $7.12 billion in U S funded military equipment was still in the inventory of the Afghan national defense and security forces. When the central government collapsed a new assessment from the special

inspector general for Afghanistan Reconstruction. CIGAR is the acronym. CIGAR with an S. Yeah, they're close, but no CIGAR. Well, they're not even close. They're not even close. They're not even close enough for nuclear weapons, right? Horseshoes and nuclear weapons and audits of the Pentagon.

I guess it's close enough, right? It can be off by billions of dollars or trillions of dollars, but hey, it's close enough for a cigar. They have struggled, they said, for years to accurately account for the equipment that they provided. They can't account for anything anywhere. No idea what they left behind. Or maybe they're just not saying.

You think that could be the case? Maybe they do know where it is. Maybe they're not just bumbling incompetent fools. Maybe they're crooks stealing stuff. U.S. military officials concluded since at least 2014 that the Afghan thing, the their personnel, we're not entering information correctly into the system. See, it's not our fault. It's not even mistakes were made.

It's like they made mistakes and we're not even dealing with them anymore. Right. So, um, the U S has no clear picture of how military equipment it accidentally funneled into Taliban arsenals, how much as the militant group swept across the country. So, as previously reported, the over $7 billion amount that was originally reported to Congress represents roughly 38% of the $18 billion allocated for the procurement of military equipment for the A and D S F the Afghan defense forces, uh,

between 2005 and 2021. So they've lost, uh, about 40% of what they had done over a 16 year period. Humvees and wraps, other things like that. They said, to be fair, U.S. forces in the process of withdrawing from Afghanistan did their part to render larger pieces of equipment unusable to the incoming Taliban militants. We've seen some of the pictures of that, including rendering inoperable 70 MRAPs vehicles, 80

aircraft. We saw them destroying those, those you know smashing the insides of them and things like that uh hopefully they put some sugar in the gas tank you know they had sugar in afghanistan i'm sure they did they probably had billions of dollars worth of sugar setting there the u.s air force personnel assisted and decommissioning effort which included clogging fuel lines there you go, and removing or destroying high-tech equipment, physically damaging cockpits and avionics. But the August DoD report made it clear that regardless of what larger military equipment

the Taliban managed to tactically acquire, the militants certainly increased their arsenal of small and heavy arms in a significant way. Since 2005, you know, we're talking about a 16-year period, 40% of it unaccountable for. The DoD had shipped them 427,300 weapons worth $612 million, including 258,000 rifles, 6,300 sniper rifles, 6,300 sniper rifles, 6,300 sniper rifles, 64,000 pistols, 56,000 machine guns. Oh, the ATF is going to be hopping mad about that. 56,000 machine guns, and we can't even get these things here.

31,000 RPGs, 224 howitzers so um yeah and besides that you remember the videos where they went in and they had the room full of pallet of cash big bills remember that it was like one of these um memes where they try to explain to you the difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars and a trillion dollars, and they show these stuffed pallets, $100 bills. Well, you know, or you could also just go to the videos that the Taliban have of the money that was left behind in Afghanistan to understand the difference between billions and trillions and millions. The UK, by the way, is bypassing its own sanctions on Russian oil.

They've worked out a way to cheat on their own sanctions. You're talking about virtue signaling. The UK has purchased at least 39 shipments of Russian oil since February, but the Sunday Times out of London has reported how they get around the sanctions prohibition. Russian origin oil shipments worth about 200 million pounds, that's about $236 million, were reportedly delivered to U.K. ports after ship-to-ship transfers. A practice that is widely used when large tankers are unable to dock

due to their size. And then they transfer their cargo to smaller vessels. So if you've got a giant ship and it won't fit in this port, they'll send some smaller ships out. They'll do ship-to-ship transfer. But they have this practice.

They said, gives the shipping companies a way to register their cargo without providing the actual origin of the shipment. So there's a little technicality here that if the ship doesn't actually dock, you don't record the origin of it. So, you know, this is just a ship.

They went out empty and they came back with, well, we don't know the origin of it. So, you know, this is just a ship. They went out empty and they came back with a wall. We don't know where it came from. Pay no attention to the other ship that's out there. They said, stating instead the country of dispatch as the source of the cargo. In this way, a shipment of Russian-made goods can be registered as originating in Germany if it is brought to a UK port by a German firm.

The news outlet, Sunday Times, was able to track dozens of shipments of Russian wallet that had arrived at UK ports since March, logged as originating in Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, France, and other countries. At least 13 of those reportedly arrived in June and July. Ship-to-ship transfers have become a really useful method to obfuscate the destination and the origin of the cargo. The Iranians started it because we had sanctions against Iranians. They found a way to get around the cargo. The Iranians started it because we had sanctions against Iranians. They found a way to get around the sanctions.

Venezuelans perfected it and the Russians picked it up and ran with it. Said an energy and shipping analyst at Lloyd's. They know what's going on and they just looked the other way. This was kind of interesting. What was happening with, you know, was just a a chinese air show and this created a bit of a problem between china and russia you know they've they've become we've with this um the actions that the biden administration nato are doing we've kind of pushed russia and China into each other's arms in many ways in terms of oil and other things like that. The Russians, you talk about the ship

to ship transfers. That's a small thing compared to the way they launder oil. Isn't that interesting? Nobody's used that phrase before. It just came to me. Laundering oil. That's got to be a dirty business. You know, they launder money. Well, now they're laundering oil. And you can launder oil by, you know, selling it to China. China is buying tremendous amounts of oil from Russia. Now, you know, that oil doesn't have, it's not colored red or anything. You know, so the Chinese can, after they bought the oil, they can sell it to anybody.

And Germany and the UK can buy that oil from China. They're not prohibited from buying oil from China. So China's got some extra oil. It can sell it. No questions asked about where they got it. And of course, as I've said many times, because the Biden sanctions and NATO sanctions, well, Biden sanctions, actually, uh, because of that Because of that, they've sent the price of oil so much higher that Russia can offer a $30 per barrel discount if you pay in rubles or in gold,

and they still make more money selling a fraction of the oil that they used to than they did before the sanctions. So that's what Biden has done for them. As I said before, that policy ought to be rejected just because it is ineffective and not practical. But of course, it is effective and it is practical. In other words, when you look at this and you say, well, everybody knows that Russia is making hundreds of billions of dollars more.

In just the first couple of months, Putin had made a bonus of over $300 billion more because of the sanctions. Because of the sanctions. Who was paying for that? The people of Europe, the people of America paying higher prices at the pump. We're paying for the bonus to Putin because of the Biden sanctions. So everybody knows that. And so if the objective was to punish Putin, you would stop that policy. But that's not the objective any more than, you know, you look at this Republican saying, well, we don't want to wind up with a 20-year quagmire. No, that is the purpose. And the purpose

of Biden is to make our oil more expensive. We talk about Occam's razor. Everybody's always saying, well, you know, you conspiracy theorists, you just need to look at the simple solution. It's right there in front of you.

He's doing this because he wants to make oil so expensive that we can't use it. And they're doing this, uh, war in Ukraine and continuing it because they want to have a 20-year quagmire. And they'd like for it to get bigger than that. So with all this happening, there was a little bit of a dust-up, essentially, between Russia and China because the Russian defense company showed a publicity film in which Russian military plane blew up a Chinese warship at the 14th China International

Aviation Aerospace Exhibition. Now, there's a couple of things that are interesting about this. Number one, the elite group, you know, just like we've got the Blue Angels and stuff like that here in the US, they have the Russian Knights. No relation. They are an aerobatic demonstration team of the Russian Air Force. They're usually the head of that show, and they were no show at this show. So Russia really wasn't there this time. They didn't have much of a presence. Usually they got a pretty big presence there. And they said there's a couple of reasons for that.

Number one, you know, they don't have any planes to spare, is what some of the people were saying, because of this war. They're kind of tight. But they also said that they're not really happy with the way the Chinese have been ripping off their designs and stealing their stuff. So they said the international community ridiculed Russia's fighter planes and their Air Force strength because of their poor performance in the Ukraine war. So right now their reputation in terms of their effectiveness is not very good. So let's not show up because people might be pointing out just how poorly

the Russian planes have done in Afghanistan. Russian fighter planes were exterminated in large numbers by Ukraine forces, so Russia feels somewhat humiliated, says one Chinese analyst. Moreover, Russia's air force has been struggling in the Ukraine battlefield. In other words, the actual reason behind Russia's low-profile participation in the air show is that it was hard hit by this war. He also pointed out that in the past, the Chinese regime was reluctant to showcase its military aircraft. Why? Because they had copied them from the Russians. This is a big part of the China price. They have built their current situation off of intellectual property theft, currency manipulation, slave labor, other things like that. That's what the China price entails.

And so in this particular case, they're ripping off the Russian SU-30 fighter to create their J-16 fighter. China was afraid of getting into intellectual property disputes with Russian engineers, so they had pulled back and said, no, we're not really going to showcase our SU-30, because the Russian engineers who were here probably realized that it's a direct ripoff. But now the Russians are not there. They can show off their plane. A Chinese online military media outlet commented about the video.

However, that shows a fighter jet launching an anti-ship missile attack on a Chinese warship and blowing it up. They said, Oh, well, we looked at this and it looks somewhat familiar. Take a closer look.

And you realize that this is, uh, a China, uh, China's destroyer. And so the scene was too awkward. Indeed, after all China and Russia are supposed to be strategic partners, said the article.

Some say the Russian exhibitor outsourced the publicity filmmaking to an Indian company. They said, no, that's not reasonable. The Russians would have viewed this. They would have known that as well. So they said, no, this is a deliberate message that they're sending. Russia's made it clear in the film that the real enemy it wants to destroy is the Chinese Communist Party. According to Chen, Russia deliberately played the video at the air show to send

the Chinese regime a message. First of all, Russia is not happy with China copying its technology. And second, Russia is letting the international community know that its real enemy is not the U.S. or Ukraine, but the Chinese Communist Party. That may be true. You know, for the longest time, people have talked about that. Fact is, you know, Russia is the country that has the largest landmass in the world. A lot of mineral resources. That's why we're talking about all these sanctions and it's like, oh, look, you know,

we're cutting ourselves off from oil and from nickel and all these other things that are there in abundance in Russia. They have a tremendous amount of land and natural resources. China, right next to Russia, has the most number of people, and they would really like to have that land and those natural resources. So any kind of an alliance that we're pushing them into has got to be a temporary one. We'll be right back. Decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show.

The South Pole has hit record cold in November. Record cold temperatures. So I guess the question is, are we going to have to flip the script again? Remember when all of this stuff started with Earth Day and all the rest of this stuff, for the first decade of climate fear porn, it was all about a new ice age coming. That was with Paul Ehrlich and all these other people. Of course, Paul Ehrlich was, his major concern was not that in the 1980s

that we're going to have massive starvation and famine. He would talk about that, but he was actually okay with that because his big problem was too many people. He talked about the population bomb. I should have called him up and see if he'd do an interview with me as we hit 8 billion people this last week. I imagine he's retired. He's in Florida or something, and I'm sure he's having conniption

fits about the fact that we got 8 billion people now. Because according to him, that could never be sustained. And we were going to have massive starvation because a new ice age was going to shut down growing of food. So you need to remember that because when we look at a warmer climate with more CO2, that would actually grow a lot more food. That would be something that if these people, if their first priority wasn't to kill everybody, that'd be something that they'd see as a benefit. But, you know, for the first decade of all this nonsense, it was all about a new ice age. Then it came about warming.

Now they changed it from global warming to climate change. So just remember this. Just remember this. Extreme cold records continue to tumble at the South Pole. It must be really cold at the North Pole where the Santa Clauses are. Three recent days have recorded a daily record. Uh, the records following the six month winter of 2020 to 2021 was the coldest since records began in 1957. Now, wait a minute. You mean they don't have records going back any longer than 1957? You mean I am older than their climate records?

I guess that gives me authority to talk here, okay? They've only been collecting records since 1957. The excuse might be that it's just weather. The temperatures have always moved up and down but that excuse doesn't seem to apply when they're talking about warmer temperatures now right for example says the daily skeptic.org for example july 19th a uk high of 40 degrees centigrade at the RFA base there recorded at the site of a runway used by after burning typhoon jets. So not only do they locate the thermometer on an airport tarmac where you're going to

get the maximum heat Island effect, right? I've talked about that many times. So how, when we lived in North Carolina, we lived out in the woods outside of, um, uh, you know, about a half hour out of Raleigh and we'd be in Raleigh and I'd look at the temperature there, you know, in the car. And as we're driving and as we get into the, into the woods and under the canopy and all this, always every, you know, time of the year would be four degrees cooler there. And so, you know, that makes a big difference.

Even if you got records that go beyond 1957, that makes a big difference. Even if you got records that go beyond 1957, it makes a big difference as to whether or not you are collecting the temperature in the same place. Makes all the difference in the world. I mean, they're saying the entire world is going to melt down if you got a one and a half degrees centigrade change. Well, I've been looking at four degrees Fahrenheit change just from driving from the city to the country in North Carolina. It's highly dependent on where you put the thermometers. It's also highly dependent upon the fact that in 1957 and earlier, they didn't have digital thermometers.

And so nobody was getting that kind of accuracy of one and a half degrees of anything. Now, they're looking at mercury thermometers and the parallax issues that you've got. And that's what the founder of the weather channel had always pointed out. He was always a skeptic up to the day that he died of this narrative. I just a couple of years ago. Anyway, so they said, well, they're always talking about the July 19th. Hi, on a runway after they had had after burning typhoon jets take off. This record high, excuse me,

has been barely out of the net zero headlines ever since. Well, I think it's time we go back to the 1970s and see what first science officer Spock had to say about all this. At least eight times in the past million years, it has advanced and retreated with clockwork regularity. If we are unprepared for the next advance, the result could be hunger and death

on a scale unprecedented in all of history. What scientists are telling us now is that the threat of an ice age is not as remote as they once thought. During the lifetime of our grandchildren, Arctic cold and perpetual snow could turn most of the During the lifetime of our grandchildren, arctic cold and perpetual snow could turn most of the inhabitable portions of our planet into a polar desert. In 1977, the worst winter in a century struck the United States. Arctic cold gripped the Midwest for weeks on end.

Great blizzards paralyzed cities of the Northeast. One desperate night in Buffalo, eight people froze to death in marooned cars. Pat Bushnell was on the road that night. Traffic just absolutely stopped. I was afraid of being stuck in the car all night long with the cold and the wind running out of gas and then what? I think that if we had to go through a real bad winter just like we just went through, I think we'd have to think about moving someplace else. Move where? The brutal buffalo winter might become common all over the United States. Climate experts believe the next ice age is on its way.

According to recent evidence, it could come sooner than anyone had expected. At weather stations in the far north, temperatures have been dropping for 30 years. Seacoasts long free of summer ice are now blocked year round. According to some climatologists, within a lifetime, we might be living in the next Ice Age. Of the nine planets in our solar system, only Earth has conditions favorable to human life. Most illogical, wouldn't you say? That narrative. By Spock. He was chosen because he's not a scientist, but he played one on star Trek.

So we're going to have him narrate this thing. And you know what he's talking about? He's talking about winter. He's talking about a very harsh storm, 1977. I think that was the one that my brother-in-law was in Buffalo. Um, he was there during a record snowstorm. They had people dying in cars like he was talking about there. And of course we just had another, big storm there in buffalo i don't know when the records are records are so

dependent on uh well you know what what uh how fast did the snow fall you know that'll be one type of record you know we had um uh snowfall very quickly or we had the most amount of snow that we've ever recorded, or the longest period of time. They have all different ways of setting up records, but right now they just had in Buffalo, as you saw over the weekend, some places they were saying seven feet of snow, six feet, seven feet of snow. It's absolutely crazy. It was 22 years ago that we were taking the family up to Niagara Falls.

I've talked about that story before. It happened after we had been in a long, protracted fight as a creditor on business that we'd owned and sold after 13 years. And we were just wiped out. And I just had to get away and think about what we were going to be doing in the future. Because I mean, we'd exhausted our resources financially fighting this thing in court, getting no satisfaction out of that and losing the business. And so again, we went up to Niagara Falls. I've told the story before. It was a story that I'd seen in answers in Genesis

publication I talked about a guy who did a demonstration at Niagara Falls tight rope walking and he did at the foot of the falls where if you've ever been there that it's very very rapid if it's not not right where the water drops down but further down the river is very very rapid the amount of water that's flowing down there so he stretched a rope across and he did a demonstration several times walking back and forth and they took a wheelbarrow and he took it back and forth and he said not like a volunteer from the audience because I'm first he says how many of you believe that I could push a person across there now

yeah yeah we believe you could do that right he wants to volunteer nobody wanted to volunteer. So they didn't want to, they didn't trust him with themselves. They believed that he could do it, but they didn't want to entrust themselves to that. And so it was kind of a metaphor of, you know, are we going to put ourselves in the wheelbarrow? Do we really trust God in these situations? And so I,

you know, I was just kind of at wit's end. I said, that's it. You know, last minute, we just put everybody in the car and it's like, we're going to go to Niagara Falls. And I'm just, and I wanted to just see the place and think about what we're going to do. And so in the process of going up there, we went through Buffalo on Thanksgiving and they had a surprise storm and it was falling at a very rapid rate. I think it was about the same rate that it fell this last week. This last week, though, they had a heads up. They knew that the storm was coming and it was more snow, but we had about half the amount of snow they got. It was about three feet of snow.

And it was something of a record in terms of how much snow had fallen over a very short period of time. And everybody was getting stuck and we almost got stuck there. But, you know, just looking back at this, what Spock is telling them is that everywhere is going to be like Buffalo. Well, none of that is true. I mean, our experience going through Buffalo, the snow was up over the hood of the SUV and we would have never gotten out of there without having picked up a guy who was a local and

he got shut down with his car. They wouldn't let him drive in the interstate. So he was walking, he was freezing to death. And there's a bunch of people that were walking, but he wanted a ride. So we, you know, gave him a ride and he knew some back roads and it took us a long time to get out of there because what had happened was it surprised people and you couldn't get the snow plows there to clear the road because it was cluttered, not even so much with cars as it, uh, with a snow as it was with cars, you couldn't get the, the plow through there.

And, um, so he took us through back roads and we finally got out of there. And what was amazing was how localized that was. You had people who were stuck there through the entire Thanksgiving weekend. Schools, as soon as it started falling and started falling heavily, they shut the schools. They put the kids in school buses and the school buses got stuck on the roads. They shut down the businesses and the people in school buses, and the school buses got stuck on the roads. They shut down the businesses, and the people in the small cars, a lot of them there didn't have SUVs because they do a pretty good job of clearing the roads typically. But again, it was a surprise aspect of it.

And so you had school bus loads of students who spent a couple of days in fast food restaurants just to stay warm because they didn't want to have to stay in the bus. So it caught people by surprise. But I was surprised under those severe conditions and people being stuck for two or three days over the Thanksgiving holiday, I was surprised that after we were able to move a little bit, it was completely clear. There was no snow whatsoever.

It's a very unique situation. And what he was doing was hyping something, the lake effect that happens in Buffalo, or a generalized snowstorm, even if it did stretch throughout the Midwest, that is a temporary situation. It's called weather. You know, see Mark Twain said, everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.

Well, they do now. They use it to completely restructure the entire world's economy and to set up a global dictatorship. That's what they use the weather for now. In fact, as they say in this daily skeptic article, anything getting colder barely gets a look at today. Arctic sea ice is making a significant near-silent comeback.

Summer ice at the end of September covered 38% more than it did in 2012 when it was at a low. Zoologist Dr. Susan Crockford has reported that this is the fifth year out of the last seven that enough sea ice has formed along the west coast of Hudson Bay by mid-November for hunting polar bears to be able to head out to the ice just as they did in the 1980s. Throw it back to that. It's been a very bad year for climate catastrophists, as they found that coral is growing on the Great Barrier Reef with a vengeance in just a few years after journalists and their experts had warned that it was likely to disappear. According to the latest satellite data, global temperature hasn't moved for over eight years. recently ran a series of six propaganda films called Frozen Planet 2,

featuring a variety of modeled climate catastrophes. Notable was a claim that all the Arctic summer sea ice could be gone by 2035. In addition, he highlighted a colony of Adelaide penguins. I don't know if I'm pronouncing that right, but anyway, penguins of this specific species. A colony of penguins in western Antarctica, we'll call them Adelaide, whose numbers were said to have fallen

over 40 years from 20,000 to only 400 breeding pairs. Apparently due to climate change. Well, they don't know if that's due to climate change, even if that's true. But even worse for Sir David is that a colony of one and a half million

Adelaides has recently been discovered on the eastern side of the continent, just like on the other side. The western side, they disappeared. Maybe they all moved to the eastern side. Are you going to talk about 20,000 that we used to have on the eastern side? the western side, they disappeared. Maybe they all moved to the eastern side. Are you going to talk about 20,000 that we used to have on the eastern side? Well, guess what? Now we've got 1.5 million on the western side of Antarctica. Since all the recent poster scares are fast disappearing,

there is increasing emphasis on attributing single-event bad weather to climate change. That has been the case all along, as you just saw with that clip from Mr. Spock. Long-serving Guardian activist, who's a journalist, Fiona Harvey, told the BBC media show, she repeated the debunked truth that 30% of Pakistan had been inundated as a result of recent monsoon floods. The actual figure easily checked from NASA satellite data is only 8%, not 30%, but 8%.

Referring to the general narrative around climate change and need to keep to a one and a half degree centigrade of warming. She noted that if that didn't strike you as a story, quote, you shouldn't be a journalist. As Daily Skeptic points out, a better question might be to ask who invented the one and a half degree centigrade figure in the first place and why?

Well, we know why. And we know why because I'm going to tell you what they're doing now. But we also know that it was invented because they won't show you the data. Same thing that they did with the pandemic MacGuffin. I've talked about that over and over again, how I was involved in trying to get some of the data rested out of Michael Mann who invented the hockey stick that was used by Al Gore. It was a complete invention, and it was a lie.

It was a manipulation of data. It was removing data that contradicted their theory. Australian geologist professor Ian Plymer gave short shift to all of the lies and obfuscations surrounding the quote-unquote settled climate science. If it had been proved that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming, he said, there would be endless citation of the dozen or so seminal scientific papers demonstrating this proof. Instead, he says, there's a deafening silence. So, where are your scientific papers? If you had any research, you would hear, well, according to this paper,

and they would talk about that paper over and over again. See, they won't even show you, not only do they not have any scientific papers, peer-reviewed studies, they won't show you the data. That's why they can't get peer-reviewed studies, they won't show you the data. That's why they can't get peer-reviewed studies. Bearers of validated facts are denigrated, canceled, and deemed controversial by those who have no counter-argument, no ability to critically analyze, and who rely on self-interest and feelings. And, of course, those who hide their data. So when we look at what's just happened at COP27,

think about this. As we have the G20 and the B20, the group of 20, the 20 biggest economies, they all agree that we've got to have some kind of a vaccine passport. And it needs to be put under the control of the World Health Organization. So at the same time, they're pushing out this vaccine passport to control our movement globally. You have the COP27 thing happening under the auspices of the UN.

Uh, so you've got Klaus Schwab and the world economic forum, uh, talking to the, uh, G 20 people and telling them, yeah, we've all got it.

And they all agree unanimously. Yeah. We got to have, uh, some kind of a vaccine passport and a global ID for you to travel anywhere. At the same time, that's happening with the world economic forum and, and Klaus Schwab, you have the UN, uh, some kind of a vaccine passport and a global ID for you to travel anywhere. At the same time, that's happening with the world economic forum and Klaus Schwab. You have the UN with cop 27 talking about how they have to do a massive

looting of Western wealth, calling it reparations. They said, our planet is still in the emergency room. See, that ties in both of these MacGuffins. Yeah, it ties in your climate MacGuffin, and it ties in your pandemic MacGuffin. The planet is in the emergency room.

It's on a ventilator or something, I guess, right? Because we've got emissions, we've got to put it on the ventilator. In historic first, countries have agreed to set up a fund, a slush fund for corruption. Now you think you can't, the Pentagon doesn't want to, hasn't been able to pass an audit. Do you think that this climate fund is ever going to pass an audit? No. Is it ever going to end? No, no. So they're going to set up a fund to help pay for the devastating impact of climate change on poor countries. No.

This is a massive looting of Western wealth. It's a massive looting of the middle class in the U.S. and in Europe. It's clearly a down payment on the longer investment for our joint futures, says the minister of flood hit Pakistan. Yeah, that's not 30%, but 8% of Pakistan. And while the compensation fund is widely viewed as a breakthrough, much of the final agreement reached by the UN was focused on addressing the impact of burning fossil fuels. See, that's the next step.

They want to steal our, this is all about deindustrialization, impoverishing, forcing austerity so that they can enslave us. So, yeah, it is, what you're seeing here with this COP 27 thing is really the world's greatest robbery. That's being pulled off by the bankers, of course. Who else? Because it's going to be the bankers who are going to be administering the funds. It's how Biden is going to get around congressional prohibition.

He's going to run this through banking industries. Payments for what negotiators call loss and damage have also been an issue for nations which are at a higher risk of sinking altogether due to rising sea levels. All this is by NBC. This is NBC's take on all this stuff. So I guess the question is this. If this is going to focus on the areas that are sinking, is Florida going to get some of this cash? What about Martha's Vineyard and where the Obamas are and things like that? They've got a lot at stake here.

They bought that mansion right there on the ocean. And if you go to some of these websites, they'll show you the areas that they predict are going to be underwater based on their models. And Obama's mansion is supposed to be underwater. Florida, most of it is supposed to be underwater. Florida, most of it's supposed to be underwater. Are they going to get Martha's Vineyard in Florida?

Are they going to get any? No, they're not going to get any money. It's going to be taken from them. So they said, today the international community has restored global faith, and this critical process is dedicated to ensuring that no one is left behind. And they were talking to people from Antigua and Barbuda and other small islands who would like to have big bank accounts. So, yeah, it's... Wealthier nations had previously rejected the proposals

for creating a specific loss and damage fund. They rejected this whole idea of climate reparations at the last COP, COP26 in Glasgow, Scotland. After 30 contentious years, they said, we now, and these were delaying tactics by these wealthy nations who didn't want to surrender and commit suicide, but now we've convinced them to commit suicide, or at least to

kill their middle class. They've been working on this for 30 years. Shouldn't we all be dead by now? I mean, you know, they've been predicting climate disasters and death of the planet, not just of us. They've been predicting that for 50 years, 52 years, actually the first earth day was 1970. And so, you know, it's always the death of everyone and the planet is always just under 10 years away. And that's been the case for the last 50 years. So we should have been dead several times over, but instead they said, our planet is

still in the emergency room. Uh, it's on the ventilator. In a perverse way, he's right. In a way it is in the emergency room. We have a Dr. McGuffin who has put us on a program of starvation. They're going to starve us to death. They got us on life support and ventilators and they're going to cut off our food and water and fuel. We need to drastically reduce emissions now. This is an issue this cop did not address.

And so as they've been fighting for the longest time to get this magic, this pot of gold at the end of the unicorn rainbow, and they just got that, now the next step is to take away our fuel. After they rob us of our wealth, tax us to create a global regime, they are going to then shut down our fuel. That's the next thing. So what we have in front of us, they said, is not enough of a step forward. It does not bring enough added efforts from major emitters to increase and accelerate their emissions cut.

So are they going to do something about China? No, no, they're not going to do anything about China. German foreign minister also voiced frustration after saying, quote, overdue steps on mitigation and the phase-out of fossil energies being stonewalled by a number of large emitters and oil producers. In other words, how dare you heat your home? If you heat your home, you're going to contribute to global warming. And the people in cold Europe say yes.

We and people in Ukraine are probably anxious for some global warming as well. But Biden and the UN and the climate lobby are going to now spread fossil fuel misery. This is their looting that is taking place now. And as part of this, they have at Mount Sinai not far from Mount Sinai they wanted to do a pagan religious ceremony of a new Ten Commandments

because they said climate chaos is a crisis of biblical proportions and instead of having a burning bush we face a burning planet. What a bunch of nonsense. So they're going to deliver the Ten Commandments on green tablets to us, delivered by people who think that they are God. So John Kerry said it's a well-known fact that the U.S. and many other countries

will not establish some sort of legal structure that is tied to compensation or liability. That's just not going to happen, he said. And he said that on November 12th, just before he went to this conference. And then at this conference, they signed us up for that. Remember, it was John Kerry who self-ratified the Paris Climate Accord. Well, you can't self-ratify a treaty. The president can't do it. The Secretary of State can't do it. None of these people can do it. And, you know, they don't have the authority to do that.

And, you know, Mitch McConnell knew that as well. And he never called them on it. All those years that he had the majority in the Senate, it's the Senate that decides when you're going to get into a treaty. And so all Mitch McConnell had to do was to call their bluff. Oh, President Obama and John Kerry think that they have ratified us into a treaty here. We are the ones who will have the final say on that. We're going to have a vote and shut that thing down.

You think, wasn't that something that Mitch McConnell, do you think Mitch McConnell doesn't understand how the voting process and the Senate works? Oh, nobody understands it better than he does. He uses it like a weapon. And so here's the dog that didn't bark. Mitch McConnell didn't shut

it down because Mitch McConnell wanted it as badly as Obama and Kerry. He wanted to shut down our economy. But you don't hear the Republicans coming after him for that. They come after him because of his personal disputes with President Trump, but not because he betrayed us on this. So wealthy countries will now set up a fund to cover climate damage for the least developed countries, but not China.

Not China. This will be financed from a broad donor base and a mosaic of solutions, such as international development banks. That's why I said this is the greatest robbery of all time, and it's going to be conducted by banks, by taxes on aviation, shipping, and on fossil fuels, global taxation for global government. Kerry tried to force an agreement to phase down unabated fossil fuels, but they're going to have

to do that the next time. The next time they will come up with that. So when we look at what is happening with China, just take a look at this video here. This shows the world's biggest carbon polluters. Did you see that? This is going back to 1889. Great Britain was up there and they just got overtaken by the U.S., but Great Britain is right behind the U.S. It's a struggle. We're up to 1898, but now Great Britain is fading somewhat. We're getting into the 20th century and they're fading back. Germany is close, close third to Britain, but the two of them, second and third place, are a distant second and third to the United States. Why? Because the use of fuel and what they call carbon polluters, that is a measurement of economic activity and prosperity. And so here we are in this rapidly changing,

all the years are flying by. We're up to 1930, 1931. The U.S. still far ahead of the combined second and third place people. Probably almost about twice as much as second and third place combined. And so when we look at this, what is happening with China?

China doesn't have to sign up for any of this stuff. Now, China's not even on the chart here, really. China is nowhere to be seen yet because we're now at 1957, and you still have Chairman Mao with his great leap forward. He's got people out there, you know, digging in the dirt just to keep them occupied,

just to keep them subjugated, just to keep them poor in austerity so that he can enslave them we're now up to 1972 and 1976 the world's biggest carbon polluters it's still the u.s is way ahead because the u.s is producing pretty much everything in the world and so now here comes china they're making their move uh great brit Britain has long since faded. They're now about six or seven down. Germany has faded. Japan is there. But look at this.

Look at this move. It's coming. 1996. China has gotten up to about half of where the U.S. is. It's like a horse race. And it's China in second place. And China is making its move. And China is ahead.

Got the horse right here. His name is Paul Revere. And the U.S. is just fading. Look at that. Fading now half of where China is. And we're talking about 2014, 2015. China way ahead. The U.S. is still fading because we got politicians who are shutting down our power generation and the rest of this stuff. So you see, China is way out, and it's growing the lead, but they are not going to be subjected to any reparations. They're not going to be subjected to any caps. Why? Because this is about what you just saw there. It's about a redistribution of wealth, a redistribution of political power.

And we've been betrayed by John Kerry, by Obama, by Biden, by Mitch McConnell, by the whole lot of them. Thanks for joining us. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening.

Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.