The David Knight Show - 23Jun23 Titan Sub — Military Secrets, Public Deception, DEI; New Info on Biden & DoJ Crimes, Will GOP Impeach?

Episode Date: June 23, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Titan Sub — Military Secrets, Public Deception, DEI (spell it DIE) Why Did They NOT Tell the Public What They Knew Since Sunday? Beyond the immediate tragedy is a story of military secrets, public deception and DEI over merit (spell it DIE). And then there's the politicized lies from "factcheckers" like Snopes. (2:14)Hunter's NEW tax problems — two IRS whistleblowers on additional income taxes evaded, felony charges and investigations shut down by Biden & DoJ (31:15)Biden's IRS scandal isn't just about corruption, but how he intends to weaponize IRS against us. He wants to make it SEVEN TIMES BIGGER. Republicans only want to make it FIVE TIMES BIGGER. Do you care what both parties are trying to do to you? (35:45) The cover-up according to IRS whistleblowers (39:44)DoJ cover-up of Biden crimes began under Trump, with Bill Barr as AG (46:47)The Hunter text that says it all — Crime Family, Mafia-style threats to Chinese businessman (54:04) What will Republicans do about any of this? Impeachment is in order but McCarthy doesn't want it and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert are fighting about who had the idea first. Were the concessions from McCarthy to relinquish centralized control merely a head fake? (58:59)Biden & Congress Celebrate Terrorist with Join Session Prime Minister Modi of India was blocked from even coming to USA over his terrorism and violent religious persecution. Now he's celebrated by a Joint Session of Congress, an honor afforded to only a few. What's changed? Muslims speak out against persecution of their own in India, but NOT "Christian" politicians. Authoritarian Nikki Haley has no problem with Modi. Is it because of her Hindu background and membership in Republican Hindu Coalition? (1:13:07) Julian Assange may be extradited THIS WEEK as his final appeal is likely to be ignored. Trump's AG, Bill Barr, long connected to CIA, wasted no time in going after Assange when he became AG (1:39:07) Montana AG concerned about joint SWAT raid of gun store by both IRS & ATF. What's the real agenda? (1:59:55) Tulsa Police Chief says its time to trade your liberty for safety. Maybe it's time to trade bureaucrat police chiefs for elected sheriffs (2:03:50) Biggest monetary shock in 62 years is on its way (2:17:17)WHEN Will Globalists Push the Reset Button for the Digital Gulag 75% of people haven't heard of CBDC. But here's what life will look like, when and how they'll push the button with a "bone-rattling crisis of epic proportions" says Brandon Smith. And he's right. (2:33:22) 5G what we know and what we don't know should make you concerned (2:54:42)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday, the 23rd of June, Year of Our Lord 2023. Well, we're going to have an update on the implosion of the sub. It looks like what I thought from the very beginning, that it imploded on the way down. But there are things that we can learn about ourselves, our society out of this thing. But also we're going to take a look at the new felonies for the Biden family, crime family. These are two whistleblowers from the IRS. And these are very significant charges. What are they going to do about it? There's a lot

of discussion in the House as to whether or not there's going to be impeachment articles. And Kevin McCarthy doesn't like that idea. We'll talk about why. And then we have the Prime Minister of India here. And there's much that we can see there as well as we see alignments in the why people are pushing back against him. Do you realize what his record is and do you understand why people are pushing back against him. Do you realize what his record is? And do you understand why people are pushing back? And why aren't some other people pushing back against him?

That's what we're going to ask. We'll be right back. Well, as you all know by now, I'm sure, because this is a real riveting story. You know, when one person dies, it's a tragedy. When a million people die, it's a statistic. So we don't really care about the fact that Trump's shots have killed millions of people around the world. We don't care even when you see celebrities damaged, having strokes, or Jamie Foxx, other people like that. We don't care when we see the celebrities having issues

or athletes dropping dead on the field. It just gets explained away by the power of the media. That's why free speech is so important, because this is the ability to control people, and they have been able to control people for the last week with this information. And by the way, we now know the Navy has admitted that they knew from the very beginning that it imploded. They strung everybody along.

Why would they do that? Well, it's nice for them to have distractions, isn't it? And so we see distractions, we see disinformation, and then at the same time they are the source of the biggest disinformation, the source of the biggest distraction from their democide campaign run by Trump, death by government. They distract people away from that. They don't even want us to see the individual tragedy stories.

You talk about an individual tragic story, and we try to do that all the time, but you talk about that, and of course you get censored and purged. And so it is very interesting how they use this, but it also tells us something else, I think, about these elites and how this diversity, equity, inclusivity thing is going to kill us all. Yeah, just switch the order.

D-I-E. We're all going to die if we don't stop this stuff. This naive idiot who was running this ship as one former, um, person who made the trip on it and survived. He said it was a kamikaze operation. He did it two years ago. He had signed up for it immediately,

but then the first one of these things blew up, didn't work. And so they had to do a second one. Remember, I talked about that. I said Cyclops and then Cyclops 2. And so he was able to get on the Cyclops 2 after they renamed it the Titan. In 2021, he went on a voyage that was successful. The CEO was on board with that, as well as a French diver. But anyway, some of the people who are now missing were on that one as well.

But he said it experienced technical difficulties all along. And as many people were saying, why did you wait eight hours to notify anybody that you hadn't heard anything from them? I said, well, it always loses communication when it goes down there. Yeah. This game, game boy controller from Logitech and everything. It's just total garbage that he put together on the cheap. And he bragged that he broke all the rules.

So this guy who was a passenger said the lights were turned off to conserve energy during the two and a half hour descent and the ascent. The only illumination coming from a glow stick. Well, I guess I got little batteries there. And, you know, as batteries age, they don't work as well. But that's not what happened with this thing. But, you know, when I look at this, he's looking at this and he says,

you've got to be a little bit crazy to do this sort of thing. And, you know, he likes to push the envelope. He likes to take risks. But why are we going along with all the crazy stuff that the Republicans and Democrats and the rest of these people are pushing at us? Aren't we a little bit like this guy? Don't we know this is a kamikaze operation? Don't we know there are fundamental flaws in this system that we have?

Don't we know that this whole thing is going to implode on us? Don't we know that they're pushing us to a war? Brandon Smith has a good op-ed piece talking about, imagine this world, living in this world that they have imagined for us. What is this going to be like? And it's all stuff that we know know it's all things that we've talked about but when you condense it into like a three paragraph narrative it's like wow that's hell on earth why would we ever get in why would we ever climb into that thing well same reason people are climbing into this a lot of times you don't think there's really going to be any consequences to it like i said nobody really thinks they're going to die so yeah let's take a risk yeah you could

die but hey i'll take that risk and so as one person commented rather sarcastically uh one of these guys the guy who was the richest man in Pakistan and his son, that guy has been a regular Davos attendee, world economic forum. Somebody said, well, it's the first time a WEF member has, uh, gone to live in a micro apartment and be happy about it for the rest of his life. Uh, are we like these guys? micro apartment and be happy about it for the rest of his life. Are we like these guys? Are we on something that we know as kamikaze? And yet we just can't resist it, right? And I don't mean that we're drawn to it.

I mean that we just can't resist it. So this tyranny is revolting. Why aren't we? It's a question. We look at it. So the Coast Guard commander was responding to criticism. A lot of people saying, you took your sweet time getting there. Just like they said, well, these people didn't sound the alarm for eight hours.

Well, it's a common thing that so many systems didn't work. Is it really a problem, or is this problems as usual? And, uh, again, the coast guard military knew from the very beginning. I said, well, you know, we didn't want to tell anybody and here's the key thing. It was a secret. Got to keep these secrets from everybody. This is one, another one of the reasons besides the widespread corruption of the Biden family, besides the obvious difference in the way they treat crime. I think it's also most people who have not worked for the government or the military,

uh, like me, I had security clearance once when I was, uh, one summer when I was working, I was going to schools of engineering. I had to get a confidential clearance, which is just, but you know, it wasn't anything that was classified. Uh, but they still went around and interviewed neighbors and stuff like that. Uh, most of us just don't really care about the secret government that they have there. We know that they have a plan to save themselves and let the rest of us die. Most of us have not invested in the security state that's there. And many of us have nothing but contempt for this secret cloak and dagger government that's there all the time. So we're not really too excited about Trump and his papers, right?

He committed a crime. And I think the appropriate thing to do is to not let him go off of that. He knew what the rules were, whether you agree with the rules or not. He knew what the rules were. And I think the appropriate response is to hold Biden's feet to the fire. Lock them all up, is what I say. But anyway, back to this. Rear Admiral John Mauger went on the Today Show yesterday and said, we had to make some decisions to prioritize which equipment could be used based

on the gear that was closest to the site. Well, there are also reports from the company that did the digital mapping. Remember, I showed that a few weeks ago and they'd sent a robotic uh deep sea submersible down and took pictures and everything created a digital map remember we showed that you could move that thing around and look at it very amazing detail even still being able to see some of the serial numbers that were on the prop and that type of thing. Well, they had that submersible, and they could have used that submersible to help, and they tried to get in touch with the Coast Guard. The Coast Guard really didn't want to use them. I started to get a glimpse that maybe it was because they had already triangulated

where they thought this thing was going to be based on their secret network of listening devices, and they didn't really want to share that. And they didn't share it with Dan Crenshaw. based on their secret network of listening devices. And they didn't really want to share that. And they didn't share it with Dan Crenshaw. You know, the former, wasn't it a SEAL, I think he was, and a congressman now. He says, I'm still hearing reports of the U.S. government unnecessarily delayed the deployment of proper search and recovery equipment from reaching the Titanic,

and now time is running out. You know, the new from the very beginning. Here's somebody put up a video of the records. Because you had a lot of people. It wasn't just the people that had their secret antenna array of, you know, being able to listen to sonar and that type of thing. There were a lot of people who monitor this type of stuff. And some of the people who are marine biologists and other scientists were looking at this,

and this was circulating with a lot of people. As a matter of fact, there was a woman who is kind of a gossip columnist out of Hollywood, and she said, what if I were to tell you that a certain very famous director who loves to do deep sea diving said this, he thought it imploded on the first day. They couldn't understand why they weren't telling people. Of course, she's talking about James Cameron. She took that down after people started, you know, commenting on it, I guess, after he called her on it, uh, cause he's afraid to talk. You talk about something that the government wants to keep secret. No, they start to come after you. So talk about something that the government wants to keep secret,

they start to come after you. So anyway, here is the real seismic data here if you look at this. This is from St. John's and some other places. But you go down and all of a sudden, there it is, right? It's quiet and all of a sudden, a big boom at that point in time. And then as you scroll down here. They show. Other listening stations. Recording the same thing.

At that exact same time. So they knew. Since Sunday what was going on. And they strung everybody along. But as I said when I talked about it. On Tuesday. I said if you go back and you look at this. Window thing. And it's not just the window,

it's also the hall being made out of carbon fiber material. And James Cameron has now put out a public statement of his own. And he said, this is a mature art. We've been doing this for a long time and people know what is required. And of course he made 17 back in the nineties. He made 17 dives himself to the Titanic and his, um, you know, submersible. And he has made a total before he made the movie. He's made a total of 33 to the site now, not to mention other things that he's done. So he knows a good deal about it. And he said, this is a mature art. We know what is required of this. And he said to make a hall out of carbon fiber is, I think he said, foolish beyond belief. And this is what all the people

who are in this industry were telling him, you know, don't do this. And he ignored everybody's advice. One of the reasons you don't want to do it out of carbon fiber is because it's brittle. You know, when you talk about materials, and this is not my area of expertise, I had to take a couple of courses in as part of the core, but it's not something that I know a great deal about. But if you look at materials, you know, there's certain things, certain parameters like hardness versus toughness, strength and compression versus tensile strength. That's one of the reasons why concrete that's very strong in compression, you put rebar in it because it's not strong in tensile strength. So you use these two things to complement each other.

When you look at carbon fiber, it's brittle. Even though it's very strong, it is subject to fatigue. It develops cracks, which can rapidly turn into a catastrophic fracture. That may be what happened. But you also had the CEO who bragged about this, and he said, Stockton Rush previously spoke about breaking rules, quote unquote, to build a missing Titan submersible. Rush is shown giving a tour of the 22-foot vessel to Mexican actor Alan Estrada before he traveled to the Titanic on the submersible. Rush, who is lost on the vessel, is seen telling Estrada, who filmed the video and posted it on YouTube last year,

he's seen talking about the seven-inch thick acrylic window on the front of the Titan to give those inside a view of the famous wreckage that lies 12,500 feet below the surface. He explains that the window gets squeezed by the water pressure as it descends and that it will give a warning if it's going to fail. Oh, good. Well, what are you going to do about that? He doesn't know anything about this. As the people are saying, the Navy doctor is saying, no, they just died instantly. You got a little bit of a failure

there. You're going to just die instantly in an explosion. Experts have said that a structural failure is one of the possible fates suffered by the Titanic, et cetera. So, yeah, that was what we now know happened. And, of course, and this was put out by an individual who found this comment. We're talking about how he used, he was prioritized diversity, equity, and inclusivity over having somebody who really knew what they were doing. Listen to what he talks about. The CEO talks about hiring people. Yes. I mean, when I started the business, one of the things you'll find, there are other sub-operators out there, but they typically have gentlemen who are ex-military submariners, and you'll see a whole bunch of 50-year-old white guys. I wanted our team to be younger, to be inspirational, and I'm not going to inspire a

16-year-old to go pursue marine technology, but a 25-year-old who's a subpilot or a platform operator, one of our techs, can be inspirational. So we've really tried to get very intelligent, motivated, younger individuals involved because we're doing things that are completely new. We're taking approaches that are used largely in the aerospace industry is related to safety and some of the things we do for risk assessments and things like that, that are more aviation related than ocean related. And we can train people to do that. We can train someone to pilot the sub. We use a game controller. Um, so anybody can drive the sub.

It's a feature, not a bug. Yeah. See, this is what we see pervasive throughout our society. We don't want merit, right? This is being taught to kids throughout school. This is now becoming a fundamental value in our society. We don't care about people who can get the job done. We don't honor merit. We despise it. We want everything done by external, uh, you know, check marks. What's your skin color? What's your, uh, sex, what's your imagined gender and all the rest of this stuff. That's the things that's important to us. We're completely detached from reality. And it was one of these 50 something old white guys with a lot of experience that told him your sub's going to

blow up. If you only have this thing qualified to go one quarter of the depth. And I said that on the second day. I said this thing had gone half of the way down, which means that it was already at twice the depth that they had tested that window for. And, of course, they fired him. He sued them. They settled the suit, which means that all the people who took that sub didn't know about that fundamental flaw in the window, and they didn't know that there's a reason

that nobody else in the industry wants to make the hulls out of carbon fiber. He's been operating this thing for a couple of years. I don't know how many times they've gone down. But that's enough times to stress that carbon fiber that the entire hull could have had a catastrophic failure because it's going to accumulate over time. That was, by the way, a clip that was caught by an account on Twitter, Catch Up.

It's at Catch Up Feed, and that's not like the stuff you put on your French fries. It's C-A-T-C-H-U-P Feed. So shout out to him for doing a great job finding that. I was going to play that yesterday. I just didn't have time. But, yeah, it's one of those old white guys. My son sent me a clip. They had a picture of a deep sea submersible from the 1960s and they were talking about how it worked. And it had, uh, had some kind of electromechanical device of, uh, steel balls

that if something happened, it lost, something, it would, those balls would fall and that would trigger an immediate ascent of the thing. I said, yeah, these stupid old white guys. What's the comment at the bottom of it? People mocking this attitude of the CEO. But that's the attitude of the people who have taken over all of our institutions. The attitude of the people who have marched over all of our institutions, the attitude of the people who have marched through our institutions, especially in the schools.

And this is becoming the fundamental attitude of our society that we don't care about merit anymore. And it's going to kill us all one way or the other truly is. And when I started the business, one of the things you find there's all these sub operators are typically a bunch of 50-year-old white guys. Yeah, that was with the Teledyne Marine back in August of 2020. So again, there had been a previous rescue, the record for that was 50 years ago, and it was only one-tenth as deep as this was. So, again, I think it was the viewport issue that was there.

He's happy to break all the rules, and, of course, as far as these people are concerned, there's no reason to have any of these things, right? As we start to pull down the fences and the markers and the barriers in our society, as we tear down the family itself, shouldn't we go back and say, why did we do it this way? Why did they always do it this way? How did that work? And why is it not working for us? What are we already doing that we've messed up the family and other things like that? Why is it that we can't get these systems to work? And why are we destroying everything and just starting from scratch again?

It's not a wise thing to do that. CEO also, everybody, he bragged about how he was a risk taker that cut all the corners. Multiple reports by ex-employees that he had in past interviews, third parties point to the company being frugal, cutting corners when it comes to safety. Because the CEO did not take any of that seriously. Yeah, that's the key thing. He doesn't take anything seriously. Well, we have the left now hates Musk.

They're always looking at reasons to attack him. And this ties into something else we're going to talk about when we get to 5G. And that is they push this narrative around, oh, look, maybe the real problem is that they're using Starlink, which is ridiculous. It's so ridiculous I didn't even talk about it. But Snopes said, yes, that's true on Tuesday. Was the missing Titanic submersible using satellites from Elon Musk's company, implying that that was the problem as to why it went missing?

They said, here's the claim. OceanGate, the company behind the submersible that went missing in June 2023, relied on Elon Musk's Starlink satellites to provide communications during the expedition. They said, this is true. This is true. But it's not possible. Because they pointed out that it doesn't go very deep.

You know how deep it goes in the water? It goes eight centimeters. Eight centimeters. Yeah, there's two and a half centimeters to an inch. So you're talking about just over three inches is how far a two and a half gigahertz signal will penetrate in the water. They were considerably deeper than three inches. You know, I, uh, and I knew this, I didn't talk about it because I thought it was so stupid. Submarines, they communicate with submarines with something that's called ELF, extremely low frequency. And, uh, to do this, they have these giant antennas in the Midwest. They have such a low frequency that you have to make the antenna size is based on the wavelength

and so they had an antenna that was 120 they have one now that's 125 miles long and that's how they communicate with submarines and they have to have extremely sensitive receivers to be able to pull that in And of course they can't transmit back to it. They don't have, you know, corresponding ELF to transmit it back. So they can, they can monitor information. That's how they communicate with them. From 1989 to 2004, the U.S. Navy had two 14-mile antennas that were connected by 165 miles of cable to do this ELF stuff. So there's no way a satellite is going to work with that. But Snopes didn't bother to look that up.

The fact checkers that we always, the people that are used to censor us, censor me specifically, look that stuff up. They used it for surface vessel. They use the star link for the surface vessel they didn't use it for that but then when they found out about that they didn't go from true to false they went to unproven eventually they did go all the way to false uh but at first they would not, they would not go there. They're now at false with that claim. But at first they said it was true. Then they went to unknown and then they went to false.

But it is, I think that there's so much that we see when we take a big story like this. Yeah, it is sensational. And it is to some degree a distraction. But it. Yeah, it is sensational. And it is, to some degree, a distraction. But it touches on so many different things. And we're going to come back and talk about the radiation depth a little bit when we talk about 5G and health effects. But now there is, as I point out, a broadband underwater boom. And this is the aspect of our secret government that I want to talk about. I showed you the sonic disturbance in the force, if you will.

And that was on Sunday morning. The U.S. Navy picked up the sound on Sunday morning. The U.S. Navy conducted an analysis of acoustic data and detected an anomaly consistent with an implosion or explosion in the general vicinity of where the Titan submersible was operating when communications were lost, said a senior Navy official. Now they're coming clean with it. And you had the Wall Street Journal and now many mainstream publications like the Washington Post and the New York Times. The headline from the New York Times says,

Secret Navy Sensors Detected a Possible Implosion Around the Time of the Titans Communications Failure. Using Data from a Secret Network of Underwater Sensors Designed to Track Hostile Submarines. See, this is one of the reasons why I think they just let this whole thing play out. They want to talk about it. But now after they're starting to get some criticism as to why did you take so long to get there? Other criticism as to why didn't you allow our company to put our submersible out there? Well, perhaps they just wanted to work with the people that they've got agreements with to keep their particular secrets. Because if they were to show the data from this secret array of sensors to

somebody who's not part of the club, then they're concerned about that. So that explains several things and explains why they're saying it's their secret network. And they talk a little bit about it in vague terms here. The data from the sensors was combined with information from airborne Navy P-8 surveillance planes and sonar buoys on the surface to triangulate the approximate location of the Titan, the submersible. So they were able to triangulate that, you know, in the same way that before we had GPS on our phones, they could give you a pretty accurate depiction of your location on these map programs. They preceded, the map programs preceded on the phone's GPS installation on there by a few years. They could triangulate between cell phone

towers to determine where you were at a given point in time. So that's what they were doing. They're triangulating that with underwater sensors of their secret network, Sunar buoys, and the surveillance planes that are flying overhead. They're all listening, and they all were able to pick it up at that depth. Think about that. About 6,000 feet down, about half the way. Because there was no visual or other conclusive evidence, however, they said it would have been irresponsible to immediately assume the five passengers were dead.

Because, you know, if you're in a sub and explode 6,000 feet down, you might, they might be okay. Search was ordered to continue, even though the outlook appeared to be grim. You know, Dan Crenshaw was not in the loop either. I thought that was kind of interesting. The Navy's acoustic analysis from the Secret Sensor Network was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. But that's it. That's their Secret Sensor Network. As in everything else, they have continuity of government. They plan to save themselves and let everybody else die.

And we see that, by the way. We see that with the financial system. When you look at what the central banks are doing, what is it? It's a continuity of government thing. It's a plan to save the central banks and let the rest of us die financially. Everything that they do is a prioritizing of their continuance, their existence. Saving their institutions, even if it means killing us all financially or literally killing us.

We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. I want to say, though, before we go to break, I just want to thank everybody for your kindness and your generosity to us yesterday. As we told you, we turned off the ads because of Pride Month. We're being put on there, and everybody really stepped up. It's amazing. We've updated the gas gauge. It's a little bit better than what it shows on the gas gauge. We're closer to where it is, which is one mark past the half. We're a little bit beyond that, but we're not quite up to the three-quarters mark yet.

But I cannot thank everybody, especially Robert, who essentially kicked off a money bomb yesterday for us for people to contribute. We had people who sent us contributions on Zelle and on Subscribestar and on Cash App. Thank you to all of you. And Robert has already sent that in on Cash App. And so thank you to all of you for doing that. It has been, you know, we were looking at it and we're confident that God is going to provide for us

whatever we need. And so we knew that was going to happen. We didn't know how, but we thank you for being the arms and legs to make that happen. We'll be right back. Terima kasih telah menonton! Thank you. Well, we had an interesting development yesterday afternoon with the Bidens. And even as everyone was astonished that Hunter got turned loose. I said, I can't believe this. This is millions of dollars I say he didn't pay. And they're going to make it a misdemeanor?

Since when does that ever happen? And, of course, they ignored the even bigger crimes of human trafficking and other things like that. We had House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith detailed multiple felony charges from not one but two IRS whistleblowers. We said, no, there's a lot of other stuff from the IRS that they don't want to investigate. And we brought these charges from two separate situations, two separate whistleblowers came to Congress and said, we want to tell you about this. One of them contacted him through his lawyer and said, please issue us a subpoena. We want to talk about this to you. And so there are other things and they wanted felonies. And these are not the

charges that Biden just dismissed. Here's what Jason Smith had to say. Not one, but two IRS employees are blowing the whistle with evidence that the federal government is not treating taxpayers equally when enforcing tax laws. were working on an investigation into Hunter Biden that opened in November of 2018 as an offshoot of a separate corporate investigation by the IRS. Let me emphasize, this was an investigation in the ordinary course of work at the IRS. It was not ordered by any individual, any chairman, or any political entity. The testimony we released today shows the IRS recommended charges against Hunter Biden that included attempt to evade or defeat tax, a felony, fraud or false statements, a felony, and willful failure to file returns, supply information, or pay tax. These tax crimes cover an estimated $2.2 million in unreported tax on global income streams to Mr. Biden and his associates from Ukraine, Romania, and China,

totaling $17.3 million from 2014 to 2019. Mr. Biden personally received $8.3 million. So we look at unequal protection in the law, and there's a lot to look at when you look at Trump, right? But what about you? Do you care, or do you only care about Trump? Do you care what's happening to you? You know, this is Biden,

who's getting tens of millions of dollars secretly transferred to him. He doesn't pay taxes on it, and yet he wants to know about every transaction of yours that is $600 or more. That's where this guy is coming from. And then of course, you know, the IRS is no threat against him. He can tell them what to do. He can shut down their investigations as he did in this particular case, these two agents, he can shut down their investigations through the department of justice. So he's fine. Uh, they're not going to come after the big fine. They're not going to come after the big guys.

They're not going to come after the elite politicians. Certainly not in his party. They'll come after politicians from the other party. And that's the whole thing about the IRS and about the FBI. From the very beginning, the FBI and the IRS have been used to come after their political enemies. J. Edgar Hoover kept blackmail files on everybody in Washington. You had both Republicans and Democrats talking about how he was blackmailing them

and had files on all that stuff. And then when he died, his close personal secretary spent a great deal of time destroying records in his office before anybody was allowed to get in. This guy's name is still on the building at the FBI, still the J. Edgar Hoover building. But when we look at just how bad this is, and I tweeted this video out because this video that I just played for you was put out initially by the RNC research team, the Republican National Committee. And I said, you know, Biden is a tax cheat. And as a tax cheat, he still wanted to grow the IRS from $14 billion a year

and give them, that's what their budget was in 2022, $14 billion. He wants to give them an additional $80 billion. So he's going to make them seven times bigger. I said, aren't we glad we got the Republicans? They said, no, we're going to take this $14 billion IRS budget and we're going to add another $60 billion to it. So they're only going to make it five times bigger, not seven times bigger. Aren't you glad we have the Republicans there to take care of this? I sent that to the RNC because I have absolute contempt for these people. They're incapable of doing anything.

You've got Marjorie Taylor Greene and Boebert, or they're arguing with each other, just about ready to have a catfight over who gets to file the impeachment claims on the floor against Biden. Meanwhile, these other guys are saying, you can't do that. That needs to go through the committee. We need to be able to keep control of this

from the top down. We don't want you introducing these things on the floor. Everybody knows they should be impeached. But, you know, the two of them, Boebert and Green, are in a catfight as to who's going to get to file this stuff first. Did you copy my work or all the rest of the stuff?

And then you got Kevin McCarthy doesn't want it filed at all. And he wants to shut it down in the committees. This is the state of Washington. You know, you got this criminal and McCarthy thinks it's going to blow back on them and cost them the majority if they do an impeachment against him. So let's not do that. It'll damage us in the next election. So let's embrace the corruption.

This is what these people always do. You know, this is what the 4-D chess stuff leads to. Well, you know, if I do the wrong thing, if I tell a lie or if I embrace the corruption, then I can keep my job and I'll be able to do good later on. Except that you don't. You don't. By embracing the corruption, you become corrupt.

You've compromised your principles and you're not going to do it when the next test comes along. And we've seen this over and over again. That's why from the very beginning, all this stuff that Alex was putting out there about, oh, Trump is playing 40 chess and it's like, no, he's compromising. He doesn't have any principles that he will stand by. He doesn't have any people that he will stand by. He's not going to stand by the country. He's going to do what is in his perceived self-interest. End of story. So what are these whistleblowers saying? the IRS? So they claim that the Biden Department of Justice buried evidence of the tax crimes in two different jurisdictions last year.

Weiss, who, according to Representative Jason Smith, Weiss sought to be appointed as a special counsel in the case last year, but was denied as well. The IRS sought felony charges against Hunter. They sent their recommendations to the Biden Department of Justice, and they, quote, came out as two misdemeanors. Newly released transcripts show the IRS wanted felony charges against Hunter, but it just came out as two misdemeanors, said Byron York. The IRS was notified of potential evidence in the guest house of former Vice President Biden,

but they were rebuffed by U.S. Attorney Leslie Wolf, who said there was, quote, no way that a search warrant would ever get approved. But what have we seen on the other side? Yeah, we have a, you know, essentially a perp walk at Mar-a-Lago, you know, big, uh, FBI raid and all the rest of this stuff. Uh, and again, I don't have a problem with that. I have a problem with the fact that Biden didn't get searched.

And it's not like I'm cheering law enforcement and all this stuff. I'm just saying that if they're going to, you know, as everybody was so upset about the Mar-a-Lago search, you understand that it would have been you or I. We would have had a violent SWAT team, and you might have had people killed. They just sent a search team tomorrow. He already got special privilege treatment, as far as I'm concerned. I think the way law enforcement is handling itself in terms of all these

over-the-top SWAT team raids and things like that, I think that needs to be pulled back. But I'm saying these guys are already getting preferential treatment. Even Trump got preferential treatment. Well, they won't even do a search warrant. That'll never get approved. I'm not even going to bother with it. Whistleblowers subscribe how the Biden Justice Department alleged tax crimes, said Smith in a statement.

During seven hours of testimony before the Ways and Means Committee, Shipley and the other whistleblowers' testimony implicated both Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, and the IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel were lying to Congress about political interference in the Biden probe. And Sean Davis says, by the way, we find out that on September the 4th, 2020, oh, wait a minute, Biden wasn't president then. That was Trump. And his Department of Justice Attorney General was Bill Barr. And so it was Barr, not Biden initially. Barr's Department of Justice ordered a cease and desist on any overt investigation of Hunter or the Biden family influence peddling,

according to the IRS whistleblower, Gary Shapley. You see? Bipartisan. This is one of the things why Trump is so upset, right? No, we let these guys skate. Come on. You know, this is the, we're supposed to be above the law as presidents and presidential candidates.

And, um, of course I always had my suspicions about Barr, and I criticized Trump a great deal for making Barr attorney general when he did it. I said, don't you realize that this is the guy who rebuilt the CIA with George H.W. Bush after the Frank Church hearing showed how it had gone off the rails and become this lawless spying agency, spying on American people. That's the whole point of the Frank Church Committee hearing. That's why they got the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. But after those Church Committee hearings and the NSA and the House, that was being run by Pike.

After those hearings, the CIA was in disarray, so they brought in George H.W. Bush, who had been working, in my opinion, a lot of evidence to show that he had been involved in the Bay of Pigs and other things like that. He had ships, even. He had Zapata Oil, so one of the ships was Zapata. Another one of the ships was Barbara,

which just by coincidence happened to be George H.W. Bush's wife's name. Anyway, they bring in George H.W. Bush, a guy they want you to believe has never been part of the CIA. They're very damaged. They're going to bring in somebody who's been deep undercover. So we've got somebody that's outside the CIA. His number two guy was Bill Barr to rebuild the CIA. His number two guy was Bill Barr to rebuild the CIA. And then when Bush became president, he appointed Bill Barr as attorney general. And that was a big deal because Barr was very,

very young for that. Might've been, I think the youngest that they'd had or one of the youngest anyway. And so when Trump put Bill Barr in as his attorney general, what's going on with this guy? So he's taking Mr. CIA, putting him in as the attorney general. He takes Gina Haspel, who tortured and produced the lies about weapons of mass destruction that got us into the Iraq war and then covered it up. He puts her in as the head of the CIA. Do you understand just how deeply owned by the CIA Trump was or virtue signaling so that he could be part of the club? Thinking, well, if I appoint these CIA people in, they'll like me.

Except they don't like him. You see what Barr is telling people about him. Comparing him to a toddler. And he's right. A lot of times Satan doesn't have to lie when he talks about us. He lies when he talks about God, but he tells the truth when he talks about us. And Bill Barr is the accuser. He is the Satan.

He's done now two interviews on the Sunday shows. And then he followed up on Monday as, uh, you know, Trump came back with some personal insults. He wrote a full op-ed piece. I mean, he just, you know, eviscerated Trump in my opinion. And it was true, but to understand that that doesn't make bar a good guy. It doesn't mean that I support bar or as a CIA guy, this is a game of Thrones. This is why you shouldn't be too caught up in this,

but we should demand that there be punishment for this type of criminal action for both of them. The big crimes of Trump, he's not even been charged with. The lockdowns, the masks, these other things that ran under his administration, changing the rules of the election to do a mail election that he now whines about and now says, oh, I'll do that too. I can stuff the ballots better than they can stuff the ballots. That's his response. We should demand that these people follow the Constitution and the law that they swore

to uphold as a condition of their office. And none of them are interested in it. Trump ought to be held accountable for the deaths and the injuries that he has caused. Untold number of people. Untold because they're censoring it left and right. Getting back to this. One individual came forward and laid out the full case of what's going on. The second individual, these are the IRS people through his attorney asked ways and means to

contact him and ask for testimony. So we did not seek these people. They sought us out said representative Greg Murphy, Republican of North Carolina. With the rejection of the D.C. U.S. attorney, the team, by the way, this is Zero Hedge, and they're quoting Technofog here with this. With the rejection from the D.C. U.S. attorney, the team sought the approval to bring tax charges for the years 2016 to 2019 to the central district of california shapely concluded the irs agent gary shapely concluded that quote the central district of california declined to allow charges to be brought there as well so they get shut down in both the

district of criminals and in california kate it's like these people, well, imagine that we can't get charges against the big guy of the Democrat party. We can't bring charges against him in either Washington, DC or California. Who would have thought the rejection, by the way, to bring charges against him in these two jurisdictions stands in stark contrast to the testimony of Attorney General Garland, who in March of this year stated that U.S. Attorney Weiss had the full authority to, quote, bring cases in other jurisdictions, unquote. Garland also said that he personally would ensure that Weiss could, quote, carry out his investigation and that he would be able to run with it, unquote. Both of those statements now appear to be false.

And Zero Hedge says, your humble author thinks the Republicans knew that Garland was making misrepresentations at the time. Preferential treatment of Hunter Biden might be an understatement. In reality, it was sabotage. The Department of Justice's conduct included slow-walking investigative steps, not allowing enforcement actions to be executed, limiting investigators' line of questioning for witnesses, misleading investigators on charging authority, delaying any and all actions months before elections. Prosecutors even wanted to remove Hunter Biden's name

from the electronic search warrants and document requests, even though this could cause the investigators to not get certain evidence. Again, this is something that was bipartisan. This began and was shut down with the Department of Justice while Bill Barr was in charge. And maybe he didn't know about it. But I think he did.

And I think Merrick Garland knew about it as well. But you understand that the bulk of the Department of Justice remains the same from administration to administration. You had, and we go back and look at Waco and what happened with that. Prior to that, Ruby Ridge. Ruby Ridge happened while uh bush was uh there and then waco happens the same people same bureaucrats exactly the same people in the same bureaucracies uh pulled the same stunt again they did it even though the the presidency changed they did it under Clinton,

the first few months of the Clinton administration. Look, these people are, for the most part, figureheads, and they don't have a great deal of, they don't exercise a great deal of control for these bureaucracies. Trump could have done something to fire Fauci, as I pointed out yesterday. It was disgusting that he didn't. He didn't even bother to take him off

of this special White House, you know, operation warp speed thing, he gave him a metal on Trump's last day and office for operation warp speed, but he could have also fired Fauci just as he got Andrew McCabe fired. You know, these are, you can remove the head of the agency. You don't even have to have a reason. You can just say, it's Tuesday. I'm going to fire you. Whatever.

You don't have to have any kind of a reason. You can still get rid of people in these so-called independent agencies for cause. You have to show a reason, but you don't even have to show a reason for these things that are directly under there. And of course, uh, department of justice is one of those. HHS is one of those. It could have gotten rid of Fauci. There are things that they could do.

I understand it's a massive bureaucracy. The reason I brought this up, it is a massive bureaucracy. Maybe Barr didn't know what was going on there. Maybe Garland did. But I think there's a high enough profile that they did on those cases. I think that was their policy. And that's an interesting thing that, and I think certainly, well, let me just say, I know that Barr knew because everybody was talking

about Hunter Biden before the election. We've been talking about Hunter Biden and his escapades for years before the election. And I even said at the time, I said, what are they waiting for? Are they going to try to do this as some kind of an October surprise? What are they waiting for? It's going to take a while for them to develop this, and they've got to inform the public, and the wheels of justice turn a long time. If you're waiting to drop this stuff as a bombshell in October, just before the election, that isn't going to work.

You're not going to be able to convince anybody on the Democrat side, most likely, ever, but certainly not with just a couple of weeks. And so there was a lot of discussion about that. Barr would have known a great deal about that. This decision in September of 2020, that was Barr's decision. This was Merrick Garland's decision as well. I do not think that this was hidden from them by the bureaucracy. Prosecutors even wanted to remove Hunter Biden's name

from the electronic search warrants and the document requests, even though this would cause investigators to not be able to get certain evidence. Well, of course, that's why you would do it. It's a massive cover-up. Our justice is not blind. Oh, it is very discerning as to who it's going to use the full force of the law against and who it's going to let go. You and I will get the full force of law, but not these guys. In another piece of evidence presented on Thursday,

Hunter Biden can be seen in a message to a Chinese business associate, Henry Zhao, demanding that they send money as promised. Now, let me ask you, I'm going to read this to you. This is one of the most amazing things I have seen. If you don't think that our country is run by mafia-like, organized crime figures, thuggish criminals. Well, this should convince you. He sends this guy a message. I'm sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. He wrote on WhatsApp in July 30th of 2017. Now Biden is out of office.

He's, you know, Trump has taken charge in January of 2017. So he's the former vice president this time. He says, we're, I'm sitting here with my father. We want to know why this commitment has not been fulfilled. Tell the director, I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand. And now means tonight, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this, other than you saying, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me, you know, the big guy, uh, and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. I'm sitting here waiting for the call with my father. Wow. What a thug. What?

It's an organized crime family. How can you not see this for what it is? I mean, it's just straight out of The Godfather or something else like that, right? I guess, you know, this Chinese guy thought, I better do this or I'm going to wake up with a horse head in my bed. Of course, in China, he'd probably make soup out of it.

But anyway, the whistleblower also revealed that the IRS recommended felony charges for Biden, Hunter, because he failed to pay more than $2.2 million in taxes on $8.3 million of income from foreign entities in ukraine china and romania however the um these these uh new charges from these two whistleblowing irs agents say oh it's much bigger than that um i've never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings, said Biden in 2019. Tom Elliott says, how many officials of the U.S. government has the CCP bought off besides the president? And I ask, you know, we had that strange outburst from Biden yesterday, right? Where you got Blinken is over there and he's trying to talk to she and, uh, you know, Chinese president, she kind of brushes him off.

And, uh, so it could have been, you know, feelings hurt with that. Uh, but, uh, Biden blurted out that, you know, she is a dictator and everybody in the state department is like, Ooh, don't go there. Don't use that label, don't start throwing that stuff around. And yet, perhaps he wants to talk about Xi being a dictator as this information is breaking just to separate himself from the Chinese and show that he hasn't been bought by them,

when in fact he has been bought by them. Maybe that's what all that dictator talk was about. I'm not, I'm not owned by China. I just call that guy a dictator. Bruise it. See right there. Yeah. Yeah. Maybe that's what that was about. According to Smith, Jason Smith, Republican of Missouri, and he's the ways and means chair that just showed you. Okay. According to him, the whistleblowers, one of whom the committee later identified as Shapely, said Hunter failed to pay $2.2 million in taxes on $8.3 million in income. His guilty plea this week, however, was only for $1.5 million in unreported income.

And so it looks like this is perhaps a different set of stuff, or there's more unreported income, but these guys wanted felony charges, which you would expect when there's millions of dollars of foreign income that these guys don't report. I mean, that's not a, oh, I really didn't understand what you wanted on that. When it says on that, carry forward this line from that line over to the other one. You know, the IRS forms are pretty complicated.

But no, this was evasion, clear evasion. And that usually comes with criminal charges, but not if you are a Biden. So what are the Republicans going to do about it? Well, Kevin McCarthy wants to do nothing. He wants to shut this down committees. And you've got a lot of people in the Republican house, Republicans say, well, let's, we've got to go through the committees and Kevin McCarthy doesn't want it to go anywhere beyond the committee. He can shut it down there. But one of the things that they fought about,

if you remember, it was, um, it was difficult for him to get the votes. And the hardcore people that were there, like Chip Roy and others, were saying, we've got to have, Thomas Massey as well, we've got to have the ability to not have everything run through the committees. There's too much central control. And it doesn't give us a say in anything. And so Kevin McCarthy capitulated to that, and he said, we're going to go back to the regular rules that we always had before Pelosi.

She started doing that kind of stuff, to have centralized control. And you might as well not even be there if you're not on the committees. And so, you know, everything would run through. They'd get these big omnibus bills coming out of committee. They'd drop thousands of pages and give people 24, 48 hours to take a look at it and everything is in it. So, you know, you got to just, uh, if, if what you wanted to have happen is there, you just hold your nose and vote for the rest of it. And so they changed those rules. Marjorie Taylor green did an interview with Breitbart and she said she's going to

introduce articles of impeachment for Biden, Joe Biden. She said, I don't know what it's going to take to get them to realize what fools Republicans look like in Congress for not moving forward on impeachment. I agree with that. You know, there's a lot of stuff that Marjorie Taylor Greene does that I don't agree with, but she's right about this joe biden is a criminal she said he committed crimes high crimes and misdemeanors you know they've admitted um well yeah those those uh misdemeanors that they put against hunter uh are actually high crimes they're actually felonies but uh it works anyway we now know on the oversight committee through our investigation that he took a five million dollar bribe from a ukrainian oligarch in order to get victor shoken fired

the prosecutor that was investigating burisma he bragged about that on video but they've got all the receipts now to show it we have bank records after bank records after bank records showing that money was transferred wire transferred in from all kinds of countries all over the world, from all kinds of foreign nationals and businesses and state governments into this fake LLC that was paying Biden family members, Shell Corporation. And again, this is the Biden who wants to know about every amount, every payment that you get that is $600 or more. How ridiculous is this? The same Biden that has the IRS saying, well, we're not going to look at any of your crimes.

He wants to have an army of IRS agents out there. He wants to make the IRS seven times bigger than it is today. Publican say, no, that's too big. Five times bigger. Everyone knows this, she said, but for some reason, Republicans in Congress can't even start the process of impeachment. They can't even begin it at this point. She said Republican members on the House Judiciary Committee do not support the impeachment effort. She said, I support Kevin McCarthy, but I have, I will have conversations with him and the rest of the leadership before I file my privilege revolution resolution. So maybe

they will talk her out of it because she really sucked up to Kevin McCarthy. I became a big fan of his. It's just like she sucks up to Trump. A green's resolution could be ready for a vote as soon as Friday. if the legislative language is not ready by then, she told Breitbart. It will be voted upon when members of Congress return to Washington in two weeks. Kevin McCarthy has urged House Republicans to vote against a resolution that has already been brought by Lauren Boebert. Resolution to impeach Biden. This week. He says now is not the right time.

Really? Why not? Why isn't this the right time? This is according to multiple sources. Behind the closed door meeting. And of course. This is part of what is going on. With this personal competition.

Between Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert. This big argument that everybody overheard them having on the floor of the House. So this is not the time, he says. This is not the time. He says, what kind of a majority, what majority do we want to be? And, you know, I look at that and I say, what kind of majority do we want to be? So is he making the argument that we want to take the high road on all this stuff? Or is he saying that he wants to embrace corruption? Well, he's actually saying that he wants to embrace the corruption.

When he says, what kind of a majority? Again, I keep saying, what kind of majority? It isn't that. I automatically read that in. What kind of a man do you want to be saying what kind of majority? It isn't that. I automatically read that in. What kind of a man do you want to be, right? You want to be somebody with character? No, you want to be somebody who stays in office. And that's what he's saying. What majority do we want to be? Do we want to be in for two years and then out, or do we want to stay there for a decade? That's what he says. Do we want to give it back in two years or do we want to hold it for a decade and make a real change? See, that's it. That's what they always tell themselves. You know, if we don't impeach Biden for these high crimes and felonies and everything, we could play 4D chess. You know, we're just going to keep our power and then we'll do something

really good down the road. No, you've already sold your soul. You've already made that pact with the devil, and it'll be easier the next time for you to avoid doing the right thing. Here's what we need. You know, we need, you want to make real change? Do it now. Don't hit the snooze button. Don't kick the can down the road.

We need real change now. What that means is you start scrubbing that filthy place right now. You start cleaning it up. And you start cleaning the filth that is rotting from the head down. And so you start at the head and you start cleaning that place up. Otherwise, you are part of the problem as well, McCarthy, and he is. McCarthy said Wednesday evening that the House will refer Boebert's impeachment resolution to the Homeland Security Committee, confirming CNN's early reporting on the approach there will be a rule vote on the floor to make referrals to the committee,

allowing Republicans to defuse the politically thorny issue for now, though internal party tension over the issue was on display for much of Wednesday. And that's when the arguments are going on. McCarthy said he asked Boebert to speak during the closed-door conference meeting, but she declined to speak. Boebert did not attend the Wednesday meeting, even. CNN has reached out to her office for comment. She said nothing.

McCarthy told reporters on Wednesday he does not support the resolution. He does not want Biden impeached. He's part of the problem. So a number of House Republicans have filed articles of impeachment against Biden since the party took the House majority, but Boebert made a specific procedural move on Tuesday. It's not clear when the vote will happen, if at all. Boebert told CNN that she would not enforce the full House to vote Wednesday night.

It's still possible. A vote to kill the impeachment resolution could happen later this week. A number of other House Republicans raised concerns about their right-wing colleagues. This is CNN writing this. Using procedural methods to bypass the committee process. They had harped on doing this in Congress to return to regular order. You know, the way they used to always do things before Pelosi. Centralized control through these tightly controlled committees. And that's the way that McCarthy wants always do things before Pelosi, centralized control through these tightly controlled committees,

and that's the way that McCarthy wants to do it as well. You had everybody criticize Pelosi for dropping the Obamacare bill, and we've got to pass it to find out what's in it type of thing, and there's no time for anybody to read the bill and all the rest of the stuff. But then when you had the Republicans take over, they did the same thing. They did the same thing. And they have continued all of these measures that Pelosi introduced to centralize control, to corrupt it, to hide everything, even from members of Congress.

The Republicans have continued to do all that. And so you had a group of Republicans, Chippewa and others, Thomas Massey and others, Marjorie Taylor Greene was part of that, Boebert was part of that. You're going to go back to regular order. And now that's the basis for which these people are trying to make this appeal.

One person, Don Bacon, a congressman, said, I believe in team sports. You should work together. And I think you're undermining the team. Reminds me of the beginning of Brazil. That little TV that's playing in the window. And the guy says, there's a lot of bad sportsmanship out there. A lot of people just don't want to play with the team. And then as the person is walking by,

there is a bomb that explodes with the window. Yeah, bad sports out there. Lots of bad sports. Marjorie Taylor Greene called Boebert a copycat for offering an impeachment resolution similar to the one that she proposed. On the floor, they were yelling and screaming at each other, and Green said, I've donated to you, I've defended you, but you've been nothing but a little bee to me.

You copied my articles of impeachment after I asked you to co-sponsor them. So, is this about getting Biden or about who gets the credit? Is this about getting Biden or is this about virtue signaling to the base? What is this really about? Asked about her accusation of copying her and the derogatory mark. Boebert told CNN she's quote, not in middle school, unquote. Green said she plans to support the Boebert resolution, that she's also taking steps to force a vote on five other impeachment

resolutions to target Biden, Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, and U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves. She said she basically copied my articles and then introduced them and changed them to a privileged resolution. So, of course, I support them because they're identical to mine. Yeah, I could have a bit more team playing there, I guess. But the bottom line is playing for the team. You're not going to do anything. Because the captain of the team doesn't want anything done.

We'll be right back. Thank you. Succes! Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Harps. I hope you're doing better, Harps. It says two weeks to flatten DC. Except it's just as phony as Fauci's stuff. They're not going to flatten DC. And then I see this.

Super Faye on rumble. So she would like to match donations today. Well, that, that's amazing. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Um, thank you very much. I appreciate that thing. Um, so, uh, there you go.

If you'd like to donate on rumble today, she said she would match. Um, let's talk a little bit about what is happening with Modi's visit, the prime minister of India. And there was a very awkward moment, as it usually is an awkward moment, when they get around Joe Biden. They are meeting and he takes Modi's hand and will not let go of it as they're walking. And Jill Biden, Jill, his wife, tries to take Modi's hand, and it's very awkward for her because Joe won't let go of it. Yeah. Oh, he's stuck like glue to this guy.

I mean, they're really rolling out the red carpet treatment for him. Why is this? Do you know who this guy is? Do you know who Modi is? He is somebody that the State Department wouldn't even let him in because of what happened back in 2002 when he was governor of a province in India. He pulled back police protection that had over 1,000 people killed. And he is part of a province in India. He pulled back police protection that had over a thousand people killed.

And he is part of a radical Hindu group that is trying to make it, essentially do the same type of thing that Erdogan did in Turkey. Turkey had been a secular democracy

type of thing and they were not a religious state. They had an official state religion. But then Fatala Gulen came in, the guy who's running all these networks of charter schools in the United States, especially in Texas. That's a huge story. I mean, you should see, if you haven't seen it,

you should see Mark Hall's documentary, Killing Ed, where he talks, it really is a worst case scenario of charter schools if you ever want to see it. We should just get government out of education, especially not putting out the purse strings for money. and so, yeah, this guy, Fatala Gulen, he was in Turkey, and he wanted to make it more of an Islamic state, and so Erdogan had come in as a secular leader, and he started making these moves to make it an islamic state as kind of competition to fatala gulen but now it's moved in a great deal in that direction and he also came after fatala gulen and he fled and was sponsored by the cia to come to america and he has a big compound encampment with armed guards and all the rest of this stuff up in Pennsylvania.

So, yeah, take a look at that documentary, Killing Ed. It's on a lot of these streaming places now. Very important that you understand the corruption that is already there in a lot of the charter school stuff. But getting back to this Modi character, corruption that is already there in a lot of the charter school stuff. But getting back to this Modi character, there is going to be a boycott of him by the squad. That's why I say, you know, I call AOC Alexandria Occasional Cortex.

Sometimes, you know, she can get on the right side of things, and she's on the right side now. Not necessarily for the same reasons that we would be there, but she's on the right side with us. But, you know, Biden just will not let this guy's hand go, literally and also metaphorically. He has escorted him around Washington. They called in a joint session of Congress to hear him speak, which is a big move to honor a foreign dignitary. And so it is at that congressional speech that they said, well, we're not going to go to it as part of a protest. So Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Occasional Cortex all announced this week that they will not attend an address to a joint session of Congress that happened yesterday. And so why are they doing this? Well, again, because of the divisions that happen in India, you know, they've got a lot of different religious groups there. They have Hindus,

they have Muslims, they have the Sikhs, they have Christians, and in these different regional areas, they are very connected politically, and there's a lot of religious persecution. And by that, I don't mean they kick you off of Facebook. No, they come to your house or to your school and they burn you alive and hack you up with machetes.

That's the kind of religious persecution that we're talking about. He said something nasty about me. I want him off of social media. It's like, well, I'm going to take you to court. That's where we are right now. It's going to lead to this kind of stuff. That's why that's significant and why we should pay attention to it. But what it really looks like is what we saw in Uganda, where you had a school attacked by Islamicists who surrounded it and killed 41 people, almost all of them students.

Anybody that escaped, they hacked with machetes, but they burned them alive as a Christian school. These students were burned alive as they were singing Christian songs to comfort themselves. Or you have a situation like Nigeria, where another group of Islamic extremists, as the current leader there was leaving office as something of a gift to him, they went into various villages and killed 700 people the week the president they liked was leaving office. So you're seeing that in Nigeria, you're seeing it in Uganda, but you've also seen a lot of

Christian persecution in India as well. These people, the squad, are boycotting Modi because he's been persecuting Muslims, but he also persecutes Christians and probably Sikhs as well and any other religion that he doesn't like because he wants, as part of this radical Hindu group, he wants to make that the only legitimate religion and persecute everyone else. The relationship between India and America has become very important, however, during the past decade because China has been making incursions into India, and we've talked about that, how they've had, you know, two armies have clashed on their border. And because of that, the U.S. sees that it's got something that it can exploit.

If we cozy up to India, they can be on our side against China. And of course, that's their number one enemy right now is China, the same people that are buying Biden. The three representatives boycotting Modi's address on Thursday cited human rights concerns for their absence. Modi, who's been prime minister of India since 2014, leads an explicitly Hindu nationalist government and has presided over a surge in persecution of religious minorities, particularly Christians and Muslims. But nobody cares about any Christian persecution anywhere. You see, Ted Cruz did not care about the Christian persecution in Uganda. But he criticized Ugandan government because they came out and made laws against homosexual acts and things like that.

And their explicit reason for it was they said, if we normalize and celebrate this, we're going to look like America. And Ted Cruz pandered to the LGBT by saying, well, you know, you can't criminalize this. And they got a death penalty if they rape, homosexuality rape a child. We can't have that. Oh, really? Maybe we should. You rape a child?

I think you should get the death penalty for that. Anyway, so we're the Christian congressmen boycotting this they don't care they don't care at all they're concerned about making nice with lgbt with muslims because that's what everybody focuses on there's been rampant persecution in china of christians of uh following gong but the only one that you ever hear of in the press is what happens to the Uyghurs, the Muslims. That's the only one they care about. Same thing in India.

All these different religious groups being persecuted by this Hindu nationalist majority. Nobody cares about anything other than the Muslims. Since 2014, said the CEO of Global Christian Relief, David Curry, since 2014, when the BJP party, Prime Minister Modi's party, took over, there's been a 300% jump in reported attacks on Christians and Christian churches. It's just been this massive escalation. That's because he has a nationalistic agenda, which is in very simple terms, suggesting that Christians are not real Indians because you must be Hindu to be a real Indian citizen. In addition to the three lawmakers who are boycotting Modi's address, 75 Democrats wrote Biden a letter on Tuesday demanding that he explicitly address human rights concerns with the Indian prime minister.

You notice they're all Democrats. There's not any Republicans who care about this. There's not any Republicans who care that Christian persecution has gone up by 300% under Modi. They got no problems with that. They simply don't care. The Muslims are looking at it. The Democrats are pandering to the Muslims, and they understand that.

Omar said, I will not be attending Modi's speech. I will be holding a briefing with human rights groups to discuss his record of repression and violence. On Wednesday evening, occasional cortex announced that she would join them. They got the cortex working this time. She added, she encouraged her colleagues to stand for pluralism, tolerance, and freedom

of the press. If only they would do that in America. Do the Democrats embrace tolerance, freedom of the press and pluralism no they don't they demand conformity to their narrow agenda and they want to silence all their opponents especially aoc anyway uh the central issue with all this goes back to 2002 when he was chief minister in one of the territories for the Hindu nationalist BJP, their party. Very serious claims that Chief Minister Modi had played a pretty active part in pulling back the police and in tacitly encouraging Hindu extremists. AOC noted that the U.S. government denied Modi a visa prior to his becoming a prime minister as a result of his role in the riot, which resulted in more than a thousand people killed. So this is a guy who's not even allowed to get a visa because more than a thousand people got killed because he pulled back the police.

Because it was a religious war that he was, a religious and political war that he was fomenting. Now that he is prime minister, now that we want to come after China in any way we can, and they've got some beefs with China, now we want to bring him in for a joint session of Congress. Occasional Cortex said a joint address is among the most prestigious invitations and honors that the U.S. Congress can extend. And we should not do so for individuals with deeply troubling human rights records, particularly for individuals whom our own State Department has concluded are engaged in systematic human rights abuses of religious minorities and caste-oppressed communities.

So some other people have disagreed who are Democrats and said we are going to go. What would their possible motivation be for that? Well, you have Representative Pramila Jayapal, Democrat from Washington State. She said, I'm attending all the events that I've been invited to with the Prime Minister because I think this is what's really important, and we can have a nuanced discussion. Pramila Jayapal

is Indian and she is Hindu similarly Representative Ro Khanna Democrat California told Time Magazine that he would be there along with all of his Indian American colleagues

in Congress Ro Khanna is Indian Ro Khanna is Hindu as well American colleagues in Congress. Rokuhana is Indian. Rokuhana is Hindu as well. Maybe that has something to do with it. You see, we don't see this as Christians. We don't hang together as a tribe. We don't defend our own, but everybody else does.

And so you've got the Hindus who are defending their own. Now, even outside the Democrat party that is embracing them, Biden and these other people, and again, it's just the squad that is pushing back on this. We also have presidential candidate Nikki Haley is slamming the squad, the Democrats, for boycotting Modi's address. She said, AOC and the squad boycotting India's democratically elected leader while they side with Palestinian terrorists and socialist dictators is exactly on brand. What an embarrassment. And, of course, you know, you look at a situation where Modi was not allowed into the country. By the way, Ilhan Omar's father was not allowed to become an American citizen because he'd worked openly as a communist

in the communist administration in Somalia. He would have had to lie on the immigration form in order to get in. He would have had to commit perjury. And so, you know, she shouldn't even be here, she and her family. But there's that. Of course, the same thing applies to Pete Boudier. There's a father who's a university professor at Notre Dame, spent his entire life, as I've mentioned many times,

celebrating and writing about the life of Antonio Gramsci, founder of the Italian Communist Party, and a guy who completely transformed, came up with an idea to transform Marxism to take over this country. So we're going to march through the institutions. We're not going to win unless we take over the institutions. That's're going to march through the institutions. Uh, we're not going to win unless we take over the institutions. That's where we are right now. Well, he came in from Malta. Uh, Pete booty gay's dad was a communist. He lied on his form to get in

as well. So that seems to be a common thing. But when we look at Nikki Haley, what are her connections? She's Indian and Hindu. Her family is. And, um and as a matter of fact back in 2015 she was part of the Republican Hindu coalition it was started by a prominent businessman who was his name is Kumar his nickname is Sh. He said he's donating $2 million to Republican candidates in the run-up in 2015 to the 2016 elections. As he announced the formation of the Republican Hindu Coalition, Mr. Kumar said his own pledge will be part of some $10 million that the new group hopes to donate to GOP candidates. So he personally put up $2 million and they're looking to recruit Hindu Americans to run for office as Republicans. Yeah.

People like Nikki Haley, people like Nikki Haley, that they would like to have run for president. Uh, he is, um, got a high-tech company. As a matter of fact. There are nearly 3 million Indian Americans in the U.S. with a median annual household income of $88,000, almost twice the national median income in 2015. And that's mainly because they are in tech fields. And they're smart enough to get the degrees to get tech jobs.

They get high-paying tech jobs. So Nikki Haley is identified as a Christian. But maybe she identifies as a Hindu. Because she was part of the, again, Hindu is not a nationality. They're trying to make it a nationality. This radical party of Modi is trying to make it both a nationality as well as a religion because they're trying to merge these things. And all these people keep telling us, you've got to keep your religion out of the public square.

You people are Christian nationalists, and I don't support Christian nationalism. I don't support the merger of church and state. I think Christianity is far too important to sully it with politics. But we should not be ashamed. We should not be kicked out of the public square. Never allow that to happen, whether it's for the LGBT stuff or anything else.

But these same people who demand that we go into the closet while they put these open sexual displays out in the sidewalks and in front of children. They tell us to take our religion and go to the closet. And if Nikki Haley is going to be part of the Republican Hindu coalition, is she Christian? Frankly, I don't care. I mean, it doesn't qualify, but when we look at the political designs of the Hindus, they're hanging together

as a group, as a pressure group. And they're going to be working to push what's going on under Modi in India. The same type of thing we see with Israel all the time. I've got no axe to grind with any Hindus or any Jews, but I don't want us to be held captive to foreign governments and to special interest groups that are operating in our country. Anyway, so everywhere else, everybody is pushing their tribes,

but not the Christians. They're shamed to be known as Christians. And so what we see in Europe is we see articles like this one that came out in mainstream media yesterday. Drudge picked it up. It was on AP News, talking about how they're taking all these empty church buildings. They had beautiful church buildings that were built for millennia. You know, everybody would take all of their skill, all of their treasure. And, you know, while they lived in very simple homes, they would build these elaborate cathedrals

that are just amazing to see them. Each and every one of them are amazing. You know, when I went with that high school group of kids, we got pretty tired of seeing them after a while, you know, but they are, each and every one of them is truly amazing. You know, if you look at one after the other over a couple of weeks, it starts to get, you get pretty jaded about it, but they truly are amazing. But they're amazing because in many cases, these things took 70 years to build. Some of the big ones are more.

This is a multi-generational thing. And it was largely an act of devotion that this was being done in most cases. To keep this going across multiple generations, it was an act of love. There's nothing other than that special about church buildings. The church is the people, not the building. But the building was there as an outward expression

of devotion from these people and how they put God and their religion ahead of even their own homes and their own businesses. They would build that first. And now what is happening is across Europe, as AP says, the continent that nurtured Christianity for most of two millennia, churches, convents, chapels are standing empty and increasingly derelict as faith and church attendance shriveled over the past half century.

Nobody's going to them anymore. So they got these beautiful buildings. And you got the Bishop of Antwerp said, there is no return to the past that is possible. Well, it's not possible because the religious leaders have left it a long time ago. For a long time, Christianity has just been a culture in Europe. The expression I heard somebody say once, they said when Christianity came to the Roman Empire, it became a government. When it came to Europe, it became a culture.

And when it came to America, it became a business. We need to be aware of the traps that we can fall into. We don't want it to be government. We don't want it to be our culture. And we don't want it to be government. We don't want it to be our culture. And we don't want it to be our business. It should inform all of those things. But it shouldn't be those things. Because that's a narrowing, limiting thing.

It shouldn't just merely be government. It shouldn't merely just be culture. It shouldn't merely just be part of our economic life and that type of thing. It's going to affect all those different things, but it shouldn't be any of those things by themselves. We got our priorities off if it is. And so they are repurposing this because the guy says, this Bishop of Antwerp says there's no way to get back to where we were.

Well, there is. Maybe the institution can't because you've got it being run by people like this bishop. But there's always a way to return to real, vital Christianity on an individual-by-individual basis. And if you have enough people like that, you'll start having people who will fill up, maybe not these particular churches, but they'll fill up a house church or something else.

A return to God is always possible for individuals. Maybe not for these corrupt institutions that inhabit these castles, these cathedrals, this hollowed-out ancient tree that is there. It's a phenomenon seen over much of Europe, in the heartland from Germany to Italy, says AP, from Flanders, northern Belgium to other places, these great cathedrals with the finest of art to fill them.

It only had enough faithful people to fill up one of these churches, but they got churches all over the place. On average, they said, every one of the 300 towns in Flanders has about six churches, and often there's not enough faithful to fill a single one of them. Some become eyesores in the city centers. Their maintenance is a constant drain on finances. And so one person said, it was Flemish, said, in my city, we have a brewery and a church. We have a hotel and a church. We have a cultural center and a church. We have a library and a church.

They're putting discos in some of them. Said repurposing some 350 churches spread across a densely populated region of 6.7 million people and they can't fill any of the churches there because a long time ago it became about a culture and started filling it with pieces of art and there was no heart in any of it. We're going to take a break. Before we go to break, on Rumble, thank you very much, YJ72. Thank you for the tip, and thank you for the listener matching the tip, he writes, or she does. Thank you, David and Knight Family, for spreading the truth. Well, thank you very much for that, and especially Super Faye.

She writes, I am matching donations on any and all platforms. Thank you very much. Thank you, everybody. Let's get the Knight Family to 100 all platforms. Thank you very much. Thank you, everybody. Let's get the Knight family to 100% today. Thank you, Faye. Appreciate it. Rumble, conservative thinker. Thank you for the tip.

I appreciate that. And we're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to get into some news, some general news on a lot of different topics. So stay with us. We'll be right back In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back.

Let's talk a little bit about news here. And Julian Assange. Do you realize that Christopher, Chris Hedges writes that we may see the extradition of Julian Assange as early as next week. And he says, and it is the death of journalism. And I absolutely do agree. You know, I was talking earlier about Bill Barr and how he passed on any prosecution of Hunter Biden or the Biden family, even with all their crimes. Didn't have anything to say about that.

But do you realize that it was Bill Barr who came after Julian Assange? of Hunter Biden or the Biden family, even with all their crimes. Didn't have anything to say about that. But do you realize that it was Bill Barr who came after Julian Assange, issued those extradition orders and everything? Bill Barr became attorney general in February of 2019. And these extradition orders got sent out by him three months later in May of 2019. Yeah. Mr. CIA. Trump tried to make his peace with Bill Barr and with Gina Haspel and all the

rest of them. He leaned on them and they turned into that stick that that cane that he leaned on turned into a knife that pierced his hand. Didn't it? But you know, he was playing 40 chess. I can make friendly with democrats with cia they'll love me of course they'll love me and i'll become part of their club well julian assange's legal options have nearly run out he could be extradited to the u.s this week should he be, reporting on the inner workings of power will become a crime,

and it is rapidly becoming a crime, thanks to people like Bill Barr and others. High court judge Jonathan Swift in the UK, who previously worked for a variety of British government agencies as a barrister, said his favorite clients are security and intelligence agencies. He's the one who's making the decisions. This guy who loves to work for intelligence agencies and admitted it. It's kind of like the guy, I always forget his name. He was a lawyer for the CIA that came up with the euphemism of enhanced interrogation for torture, right? And he said he decided that he would become, he wrote a book called Company Man, and I can never remember his name.

And thank you very much. Unrumble Mark M228, thank you for the tip. He says, I double my subscribe star and I'm doing my part to help get DK to 100%. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. And Angus Mustang as well. I appreciate all the donations yesterday, especially Angus Mustang donated several times. Thank you so much.

I appreciate that. And Doug Elkins. Thank you on RockFan. But, you know, the guy, he wrote Company Man. He came up with a term, enhanced interrogation, so they don't call it torture. He said he watched the church committee hearings as a young law student. He said they need a good lawyer. They don't have very good people as lawyers, so I'll become a lawyer.

Because he didn't really have any problem with what they were doing, spying on Americans and so forth. So here's another lawyer, a guy who's a judge now. He said when he was a lawyer as a barrister, he said he really did like the security intelligence agencies. He rejected two applications by Assange's lawyers to appeal his extradition last week. The extradition order was signed last June by home secretary Priti Patel. Also Hindu. I'm not going after Hindus.

I'm just saying it is kind of interesting to see how they are in very high places, isn't it? Julian's legal team has filed a final application for appeal, the last option available in the British courts. If accepted, the case could proceed to a public hearing in front of two new high court judges. But if rejected, he could be immediately extradited to the U.S., where he will stand trial for 18 counts of violating the Espionage Act. Charges that could see him receive a 175-year sentence as early as this week. And again, those charges were brought by Bill Barr's Department of Justice under President Trump.

President Trump has absolutely no loyalty to any principles, any party, any person. Julian Assange telling us the truth about Hillary Clinton was one of the things that helped get President Trump elected. And then his Department of Justice came after Julian Assange and the First Amendment. Yeah, you think the Democrats are the only ones who are trying to destroy the free press? No, it's Republicans as well. The only chance to block an extradition is if the final appeal is rejected, he said,

would come from the European Court of Human Rights. The parliamentary arm of the Council of Europe, which created that council, that European Council of Human Rights, along with their Commissioner for Human Rights, oppose Assange's detention, extradition, and prosecution. They said because it represents a, quote, dangerous precedent for journalists. Even the people who want to censor everybody are talking about that. It is unclear if the British government would abide by the court's decision, if it ruled against extradition, or if the UK would just extradite Julian before an appeal to the European court can be heard. Once shipped to the US, Assange

would be put on trial in the US District Court for the East District of Virginia, where most espionage cases have been won by the US government. Yeah, they got a, it's kind of like Republican standing trial for January the 6th or something in Washington, D.C. Judge Vanessa Baratzer at Westminster Magistrate's Court refused to authorize U.S. government's extradition request in January 2021 because of the severity of the conditions that he would suffer in the U.S. prison system. Her decision, however, was overturned after an appeal by U.S. authorities. The assurances that they gave was that Julian would not be subject to special administrative measures.

They promise that both pre-trial and post-trial, because it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that this kangaroo court is going to find him guilty of what is not even a crime. Julian will not be held in an administrative maximum facility in Florence, Colorado, pre-trial, and they claim not after they convict him. But that is not the only supermax prison in the U.S. Julian can be placed in one of our other Guantanamo-like facilities, a communications management unit. Remember, we had Marty Gottesfeld, who they put in there.

Somebody who exposed a politically connected and connected to Harvard Medical School that medically kidnapped that young girl. And, you know, he exposed that. They put him in prison. And they put him in this kind of prison, communications management unit. I guess that's where we're going to put people that are considered to be enemies of the government or enemies of the corporations and universities that are connected with the government. If you're an enemy of the state and you are exercising speech, they put you in a communications management unit. The CMUs are highly restrictive units that replicate the near total isolation

imposed by these other supermax prisons. And it is really horrific, the conditions that are there. And so that is what I imagine he can look forward to. They said the U..s allocates a secret black budget of 52 billion dollars a year well how do we know if it's a black budget maybe it's not enough for these guys maybe that's why they do these things like you know create crack cocaine epidemic in la to fund their other secret wars maybe that's why they do things like you know sell weapons and and parts parts to Iran as part of the Republican

and Reagan administration, so they can fund their black ops and their other wars. Maybe $52 billion just isn't enough. We'd give more than that to Ukraine. That's not their only budget. They were having record crops the entire time they were in Afghanistan, record crops of opium, um, and, uh, other things like that, poppies. Uh, but anyway, supposedly they got at least $52 billion a year. Um, and, um, as part of this writes Chris Hedges, they have multiple types of clandestine operations carried out by the NSA, the CIA,

other intelligence agencies, usually beyond the scrutiny of Congress. They don't know what's happening. They didn't even know. Dan Crenshaw didn't even know what's going on with the Navy's secret monitoring stuff and what they already knew about the Titan sub that had imploded day one on its way down. All these clandestine activities, especially after 9-11, have massively expanded, writes Chris Hedges. Senator Frank Church, after examining the heavily redacted CIA documents released to his committee, defined the CIA's covert activity as, quote, a semantic disguise for murder, coercion, blackmail, bribery, and the spreading of lies.

That's why they work with people like Jeffrey Epstein and others. And that's how deep and dark they go. I mean, you constantly see stuff surfacing, even going back to the 1950s when people would truly be appalled at what now they have come to accept. You had a CIA agent at the time who was getting people high on LSD without their knowledge, using prostitutes, taking pictures of them, and blackmailing them, all the kind of stuff

that you see Epstein doing. All these intelligence agencies, Mossad, CIA, them, all the kind of stuff that you see Epstein doing, all these intelligence agencies, Mossad, CIA, they all do that kind of stuff. But these people are really satanic, and they're the ones who are running our governments. You know, we have the Five Eyes organization, the five English-speaking countries, the U.S., the U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand. And this is their character. And Frank Church knew it. From their inception they were doing this. The CIA and intelligence

agencies along with the military, all of which operate without effective congressional oversight, are the engines behind Julian's extradition. Again. Bill Barr. There from the very beginning to rebuild after the Church committee hearing, to rebuild the CIA with George H.W. Bush.

And then he comes in and he takes revenge on Julian Assange. Does it all with Trump's complicity. It's complicit in it as well. Julian inflicted, by exposing their crimes and lies, he inflicted a grievous wound, and they want vengeance, just like these people wanted to get vengeance with Colby, who had talked to Frank Church, and they did. They got him, found him dead in his pajamas in a boat. I guess he just decided in the middle of the night that he was going to go for a boat ride, rowboat,

in his robe, in his robe and pajamas. The control that these forces seek abroad is the same kind of control they seek at home. The weapons of tyranny abroad, especially these intelligence agencies, have always done the same things domestically as well. So what kind of domestic terror are these government agents involved in right now?

Well, we have armed IRS agents surrounding up the gun purchase records at various stores. This happened in Montana. I talked about this a few days ago. But now the Montana Attorney General is talking about it as well. The fact that you've got a joint raid between the IRS and the ATF coming in and seizing records. It's like, what's going on with that? Montana Attorney General Austin Knudson spoke to Breitbart. He said, uh, armed IRS agents, uh, went into the Great Falls, Highwood Creek outfitters and seized dozens of boxes, boxes. These are my boxes. They are firearms forms that they keep. They're not financial records. And that's the key point. Um, uh, let me, uh, read some of tips here, and I'll get back to the story here.

On Rockfan Spencer DeLong, David, I don't have the money to tip, but I am sending prayers for your family. I admire your willingness to stand up for what you believe in, even if that affects you financially. Much respect. God bless. Thank you. Thank you so much for that. And, you know, I have that in the clip that we play, uh, that if you can't support us that way, it's one of the reasons why

I don't want to put this behind a firewall. And, um, you know, I know Adam Curry's got people tell me, you know, Adam Curry's got a different way to cover this. We don't have to be dependent on corporate advertising and stuff like that, but, you know, I don't want to put it behind a firewall because I know that not everybody has money and I want to get this information out, especially when we're talking about what is going to be coming up. We've been through in 2020, 2021, 2022,

and now things have eased up, but they're going to come back but they're going to come back, and they're going to come back in a big way because they've got to have their new world order in place by 2030. And I'll talk about that a little bit. We need to get people to understand what this is. Three-quarters of the people don't even know what CBDC is. They certainly don't understand the open plans of these people.

You know, what happened in 2020, they were able to get away with that because we hadn't gotten the information to enough people about dark winter, about 9-11, about all these other things. And, of course, this was the second shoe to drop. It dropped 20 years later. But they had been preparing all this stuff for 20 years. It happened right there with 9-11. So they have these open plans.

They had laid all the legislative agenda, and all they needed was somebody like Trump to pull the trigger and make it happen. That's what he did in 2020. But that legislative agenda was enacted back in 2001 as part of 9-11 and the false flags and things like that. And it just sat there. They're creating all of these issues right now. They're laying out their plans, practicing their plans, and they're going to drop this stuff on us in a big way because they don't

have much time to get this done. So they're testing their mechanisms and then they're going to create a crisis and roll these things out. And we got a very good look at it these last few years. Just don't fall into the trap of thinking that it's over. It's not over. And our real defense about this is to expose it and to do it our way. You know, they're constantly preparing people with their works of fiction and the rest of the stuff too. Oh, look at this is really horrible. But in the end, you got one person who comes out there and saves everybody from it. It's not going to work that way.

We're going to have to have a big group of people understanding what this thing is to shut it down before it really gets going. You know, once this cancer metastasizes to a certain point, it's going to be really hard really hard uh so i appreciate that and i and i do ask for your prayers because they make a big difference for all of us and so i ask you to pray for our family and uh that uh god would keep us well and um because we have some members who are suffering right now. And so please keep that in your prayers. And we know that God will provide what we need.

And so we appreciate you for being the ones that answer the call. I really do appreciate that. Austin McGee, thank you very much. Again, it's the same people who keep helping us to a great degree, and I really do appreciate that. It's been a real blessing to us. On Rumble, LT1776, thank you for the tip. It says, trust in the Lord Jesus Christ. Receive the free gift of salvation, and everlasting life shall be yours. That's the message. And that's, you know, when we talk about the sub going down,

you know, for this last five days, everybody's been thinking, are they still alive? Are they slowly dying? Did they die suddenly? You know, we're all going to die. Is it going to be suddenly? Will we have a chance to make our peace with God,

or will it just happen instantaneously like it did to those people and be taken by surprise? Um, you know, they didn't think it was certainly CEO didn't think he thought he could do anything. He thought he could break all the rules and there'd never be any consequences for it. Well, God sets the rules for our life. And, uh, you know, you look at the, look at the way that Europe is going down the drains. When we had the Great Awakening at the beginning of this country, and God blessed us with a kind government, a wise government, and a great constitution.

But what preceded that was the Great Awakening. And one of the key things in that was Jonathan Edwards' sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. And And you know, people get really upset about that. Oh, look, it's fire and brimstone preacher. No, what he was doing was he was saying, God is sparing you. You were standing over the abyss. Any of us could die today,

just like those people on that submarine. But you're standing over the abyss and God has extended mercy and time for you to get a handle as to what life is about. Why are you here? Is there a God? Has he spoken to us? He's given you that time to think about it. And he painted an accurate picture, scared people, but they also cried out to God, you know, kind of like Jonah going to Nineveh. He told them what was going to happen, and they said, oh, okay, well, we're going to change, but then Jonah got mad. He said, God, what are you trying to do? Are you trying to make me look

like Julie Green or some fault? I told these people you're going to judge them and destroy their, oh, no, you told them to repent, and they did repent, and these people you're going to judge them and destroy their, oh, no, you told them to repent, and they did repent, and so I'm not going to do it. But he got very angry at God about that. Anyway, on Rockfin, Jay Gold, thank you very much. I appreciate that. He says, donate or David will vanish.

Well, thank you. The folks that never donate are like people that never vote. Let's not lose the david knight show the same way with uh apathy that we've lost our country david has just a few years left so let's support him now please yeah at the most um yeah there's there's also there's also the other thing you know when you start looking at it it's like well okay at um uh 10 years maybe i don't know five years who knows what uh what's going to happen with anything. Nothing.

Tomorrow's not promised anybody though. On Rumble, Jason Barker. Thank you, Jason. I appreciate that. He says, don't forget to hit that like button. Yes. That's the thing that I need to do a better job of, and that is to try to promote, but you guys can help me do the promotion as well.

One of the things we want to try to do, we just haven't been able to, uh, get through with it as I'd like to try to post up, um, on Substack. Um, and we had one person, I want to thank him, a listener who was insistent that, um, he wanted to donate to us on Substack and, uh, he kept trying to send us money on Substack. And so we're going to try to do more on Substack. And, um, one of the things I want to do on a regular basis is, um, but I'm, I don't want to, I don't want to hassle people with too much stuff. And I noticed a lot of people do put things up on a regular basis. I don't know really what is a reasonable customary, but, um, I would like to, on a regular basis, put up the full description with the time code.

So people can see the topics if they want to jump from topic to topic. I think some people like to do that since it's such a long program. And, um, a lot of times that doesn't come across on some of these platforms. You know, if you've got, uh, if you're listening to the podcast, sometimes the, the, uh, service that you use to download the podcast, sometimes that description gets truncated or other things like that. So, um, been thinking about putting that up on sub stack and, and doing some more articles. Uh, geese busters.

Thank you very much. That is very generous. I appreciate that on rumble, uh, free geese control for super fake, super fake. There you go. Um, geese busters, geese busters. Thank. Super Fay. There you go. Geesebusters, Geesebusters. Thank you very much. Love the name. And I really do appreciate the support.

It's been a real faithful supporter of ours. Anyway, getting back to the situation where we have the ATF and the IRS coming after this person, like I said, the Attorney General in Montana about this gun store told Breitbart News, he said, I spoke with a shop owner who told me that 20 heavily armed IRS agents from multiple states in our region served a warrant before his business opened.

You see how different that is compared to Biden, right? They won't even issue a regular search warrant for the Bidens. These IRS agents said, well, we'd like to get a search warrant. And the U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney says, no, we'll never get that approved. Not in D.C., not in California. You're never going to get a search warrant for the Bidens. No. But you won't just get a search warrant.

If you're like this business owner, you'll get a SWAT team. That's why I said, you know, Trump still got preferential treatment to you and I. He didn't get SWAT teamed at Mar-a-Lago. He said they took dozens of boxes. My box, they took my boxes. Full of 4473s, and that's their firearms records. More than a decade's worth of that store's firearm records. This is extremely concerning because it seemingly exceeds

the search warrant that limited the scope of the search to financial records, says the Montana Attorney General. So they get a search warrant, the IRS does, for financial records, but then they take the gun records. These are not financial records, they're records of lawful firearm purchases. What the hell, he says, does the IRS need with these 4473s? We know the ATF in Washington is trying to scoop up as many of these purchase records as possible, and that looks like what they're trying to do here. He also noted that this harassment is happening while Biden is pushing to repeal the Protection of

Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, thereby opening up gun makers to lawsuits of the illegal use of firearms. Republicans knew that they were going to do frivolous lawsuits to come after gun manufacturers if their guns were used in the commission of a crime. And that is wrong. Because if the gun makers, if they make a gun and you fire it and it blows up in your face and injures you, yeah, they should be sued. But not if somebody takes their weapon and uses it in the commission of a crime. They should not be sued anymore than the monster who used a Ford SUV to mow people down in the Christmas parade in Waukesha. You don't sue Ford over that.

If he had used a gun to kill those people, you shouldn't have sued Smith & Wesson, for example. But, of course, they've already, I think it was Smith & wesson for example but of course they've already i think it was smith and wesson who caved on the sandy hook stuff uh it was a one of the gun companies that had gone into um i can't remember now i don't know if it was remington or smith and wesson but they had gone bankrupt and they were being run by a bunch of lawyers and receivers and accountants and stuff like that. And, uh, so, um, they were, uh, they were in receivership. So, um, you know, they just complied with it.

We're not going to fight it. Here's a big pile of cash. That's a very dangerous precedent, but, um, the Democrats were going to use that as a tool of gun control. And so the Republican said, you're not going to be able to, uh, sue somebody. If there's nothing wrong with their gun, the protection of lawful commerce in arms. Act. And the Democrats have been ignoring this and suing people anyway, and Biden wants to get rid of that completely.

And so the Montana attorney general said, I think at the same time, they're trying to push this. They're also trying to get as many records of people so they can set this up. Now here's a Tulsa police chief who goes on NPR and he says, now might be the time to trade some freedom for gun control. Trade freedom for safety. You know what is truly ironic? is this guy's name is Franklin.

The Tulsa police chief, Wendell Franklin, wants you to trade your liberty for the promise of safety. And it was Benjamin Franklin who said, you're a fool if you do that, and you don't deserve either if you do that, right? If you're going to trade your essential liberty for the promise of safety, you don't deserve either. And history has shown us that you get neither, right? To the extent that you trade your freedom, to that extent you become a slave.

Slaves never have money, they never have safety or security, even though they are behind bars. They never have any of that stuff. And so I say that instead of trading some freedom for gun control, as this police chief Franklin wants us to do, I think what we do is we trade unelected, bureaucratic, law enforcement officers for elected sheriffs.

Maybe what we need to do is we need to start a movement to say, we need to get rid of these police, and we need to go back to sheriffs and deputies that you elect. You see, the police don't work for you. They're not accountable to you. They're hired by the mayor or other people, or maybe a city manager. And they're accountable to them. And so that's one of the reasons why they write tickets instead of protecting people.

And so now you've got this guy in Tulsa calling for a 9-11 style response to gun violence. Well, yeah, it would be kind of 9-11. It'd be based on false information, an authoritarian seizure of essential liberty and violation and impudiation of the constitution. Yeah, it would be like 9-11. Suggesting that people may have to give up some of their freedom in exchange for gun control. NPR posted an interview with him on Sunday, noting that he is critical of constitutional carry. He wants more regular, of course, he's critical of the constitution as well, that he swore to uphold as a condition of his office. He wants more regulations on firearms that Democrats describe as ghost guns

and is open to a waiting period for the purchase of AR-15s and similar firearms. Franklin said, law enforcement, we are the experts. You see? It's always the same stuff they pull. Public health, we are the experts, and we're going to keep you safe, so give up your liberty. We are the experts. We're law enforcement. We're the experts on keeping you safe. Are you really? How's that working out for people in these Democrat cities like Chicago? How's that working out? Do you really keep people safe? No, no. We carry a gun because the police are too heavy

and they're too slow and they're never there when you need them. Even if they're trying to do the right thing, they can't be everywhere at once. And we don't want them everywhere at once. That's a police state. So, yeah, that's why we have guns. He said, we're the subject matter experts at protecting America, right? Protecting our cities. I hadn't noticed that.

I hadn't noticed how expert you are in this you know on the one hand they will talk about how crime is exploding so we need more police but on the other hand they say you need to give up your guns because we're the experts to protecting everybody right same mcguffin they always run these same mcguffins this guy's sounding like fauci with a gun well that's a scary idea, isn't it? It's going to shoot you in a different way. Rockfan, Kimberly Kurdish, thank you very much. I appreciate that. She writes, God bless you. Well, that is a blessing. Thank you. I appreciate it. Rumble Harps, thank you very much. My rant here, LOL. Thank you, David and family.

Again, on public radio, he says, I am charged with protecting this community. Does he realize how much he sounds like Judge Dredd? I am the law. Ultimately, I'm a Second Amendment guy. They all start out by saying that. You notice that? I love a Second Amendment guy. They all start out by saying that. You notice that? I love the Second Amendment. I love the Constitution.

But we got too much of that right to keep and bear on them. I love the First Amendment, but we got too much of that religious liberty or the freedom to speak. You can't fire in a crowded theater, all this stuff. You can't have that. I love all these things, but we just, it'd be nice if we could have them, but we can't because you people are evil. I, on the other hand, am an expert who can keep you safe and I should be able to take all this stuff away from you. I'm a second amendment guy, but I'm okay giving up some of that freedom,

right? We had to give up some of that freedom after 9-11. No, he didn't. I fought that tooth and nailed it. I'm okay with waiting three days, five days or whatever to get my firearm if I go out and purchase another firearm. So I'm okay with a pause to allow weapons to be purchased and to allow the government and the gun companies to look at the background and do a thorough check before that gun goes to somebody. That's called a privilege. It's called a privilege. How is that worked out for people? I mean, are criminals not able to get guns, Mr. Police Chief? Give me a break. Give me a break. It turns our lives into privileges. And then he compares it to the proverbial seatbelt. You know, just like they were comparing the masks to seatbelts and motorcycles.

We make you wear masks and helmets for your safety. I said, oh, really? Do you make, um, yeah. So, uh, I'm not safe wearing my seatbelt or my mask. If, uh, if, uh, you're not wearing your seatbelt or your mask in your car, is that right? No. As a matter of fact, if you wear a seatbelt or a mask, you're, um, uh, uh, wearing a mask, I should say, uh, you may be more likely to hit me with your car, but, um, he compared it to the seatbelt laws. He said, you know, we put seatbelt laws in place and I'm not exactly sure when maybe in the 1980s, I think, no, it was 1970s.

I remember because I had a Volkswagen rabbit and the the Volkswagen Rabbits had automatic seatbelts. They had a knee bar, and then they had this, like, shoulder strap that plugged in to the door when you opened it up. And it's always kind of funny, because whenever I'd have relatives, middle-aged women who would ride with me, you know, my, or my grandmother or something, you know, they would always, what do I, what do I do with this? And they're trying to get under it. They get under it and then they close the door and ask behind them. And always get dangled up in this thing. Uh, but, uh, anyway, so I had that and I'd been wearing seatbelts even before that. And when they made the seatbelt laws mandatory, I disconnected it. And this thing was like idiot light, you know, on there telling me I'm an idiot for not having my seatbelt on.

But it's like, it's the principle of the thing. And, uh, you know, I thought seatbelts were a good thing, but I thought it was far more dangerous that the government would require me to wear one than it was to go without one. And I didn't have an accident where I got hurt, but I have seen government out of control on what it's done to my life and everybody else's life because of that. So I think I was right back then. He said, we've mandated that everybody start wearing a seatbelt. It took some time for people to grab hold of that. But you look at it today, it's an automatic thing that people put on their seatbelt when they get into a vehicle. I guess he doesn't write many seatbelt tickets then, huh? It certainly nagged people about it. He said, you feel uncomfortable

not wearing that seatbelt. See, that's the conditioning. And it is. It does condition you to do that. That's a big reason why they do everything. It's conditioning conditioning What we went through for the last three years was Conditioning Conditioning for safety And now you've got people who are uncomfortable Not wearing the mask He says, I think we give up something To get safety

To get something that is safe And I think that's where we are today We're going to have to give up some things And I think that there are some things that we can give up for a safer community. Well, here's what I would suggest we give up. Law enforcement officers like him. Institutions like police and police chiefs that are not directly accountable to the people. I think we give those things up.

That's what we really need to give up. Rumble, KWD68, thank you very much for the tip. I think we give those things up. That's what we really need to give up. Rumble, KWD68, thank you very much for the tip. He says, keep fighting the good fight, David. Thank you. Look into the Department of Navy's response, quote-unquote, to the Camp Lejeune legislation. Well, I have to look into that.

I have not heard anything about that. Camp Lejeune legislation. On Rockfin, GMO, thank you very much. I appreciate that. Thank you, everyone, and thank you especially, Faye, Supra F Mo, thank you very much. I appreciate that. Thank you everyone. And thank you, especially Faye, Supra Faye. Thank you very much for matching those contributions today. Steve Friend, I had just last week, was it? I think. But he's the FBI whistleblower and he's talking about something the FBI is doing right now. He calls it social engineering.

He said, um, the FBI is pushing to convert all of their cars. And they've got a lot of them to soy based tires. He said, they're embracing the stereotypical liberal Silicon Valley work culture. Uh, so he is the FBI,

former FBI agent. Uh, again, great interview. If you haven't seen it, the guy is, you know, straight as an arrow and he refused to go after people and investigate them simply because they harass them, intimidate them, harm them anyway, because they happen to be in Washington on January the 6th, exercising their constitutional rights to redress grievances. And that's really what was happening. I told people to stay away. I told them it was a trap. I told them Trump was not worth supporting.

But they still had a right to do that. It was not a crime. Nobody was hurt. And yet the penalties that they're handing out to people are just draconian. And they're using it to attack everybody of political, to justify their political persecution of their political opponents. But he said this was given to him by some FBI agents. It's on an unclassified intranet.

He said the FBI has rolled out new tires made with environmentally friendly soy. Yeah, I guess it must be the Archer Daniel Midland tires. They used to be the ones who would sponsor all of the programs on Sunday, the news programs on Sunday. And we would watch those things, record them and watch them. Almost all of them were brought by Archer, Daniel Midland, you know, big, uh, big supporters of politics because they're big Agra. And I haven't watched them for a very long time.

So I don't know if that's still the case or not, but it was the case back in the eighties. I'd sit there and, you know, a lot of, a lot of people sat there and watch a football game or, uh, sometimes there'll be yelling and screaming at the team members on the TV for not doing the right thing. I was yelling and screaming at these people who weren't saying and doing the right things on TV. They couldn't defend their position. But anyway, that was a long time ago. The FBI are allegedly required to give purchasing preference to environmentally preferable products. And what he's pointing out is that this is crony capitalism.

They're saying, hey, these tires are good. They work just as well in some instances. They're better than the other ones. But is it a basis of merit? It may be that they are better. I don't know. Manufacturers have discovered that soybean oil can reduce the amount of petroleum used to manufacture tires and extend tread life soybean oil mixes more easily with the rubber compounds

and tires to improve the energy efficiency of the tire manufacturing process well that's questionable um but um the the point that steve friend was making was that there's only one company that makes these tires. And they can say, look, we're using soybeans instead of oil, so this is good. And you need to buy them from us, even if they're more expensive, perhaps. I don't know. But it's crony capitalism. He says, I question whether it's appropriate for the federal government to initiate social engineering or environmental activist causes. I also question the wisdom of advocating for a particular product

that is only manufactured by one company. That's the crony capitalism aspect of it. That hardly guarantees that you're going to have a fair bidding process because there's nobody else that's going to bid on it, right? And that's a key part of all this greenwashing. Oh, look, this company's got a new product, and they're the only one that's like it, and they say it's green, so they get the contract. We're not going to have a competitive bidding process. He says it calls the federal government's requirement to prioritize environmentally preferable products into question as a potential avenue for elected officials to route taxpayer funds to their political allies. He's absolutely right.

We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about what one author calls the biggest monetary shock in 52 years. We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. Well, we've had people who are mortgage payers in the UK are getting a shock. And, of course, a lot of them are on variable rate mortgages. I don't know what percentage, but they're saying that the Bank of England has done a 50 basis point hike, half a percent interest in their core interest rates.

It surprised the markets. They'd been expecting a 25 basis point rise, but they went 50 basis points. It takes the bank's main interest rate up to 5% from 4.5%. And yet, inflation is at 8.7%. I mean, it is not above the inflation rate. So it's not really even keeping up with inflation. So what are they going to do about this? Just understand that the government, just as I said about continuity of government, they're going to do everything they can to save themselves,

and they're going to let the rest of us die, and they'll let the rest of us die financially if necessary, but they're going to save the institution. The central banks, the Federal Reserve Bank, the Bank of England, all of them put their institution and their power above the well-being of the public. It's just that simple. They don't care.

So if they get into a situation where, well, we've got to save our currency, got to save our institutions, and that may mean that we raise interest rates to break everything else, well, we'll do that. We didn't see that here because we already have some of the effects of the election starting to kick in.

And they're going to pull everything out that they can to make people get a temporary gratification so they will not vote the rascals out. But again, it's almost 9% for inflation, and their main rate is only half of what inflation is. And so we're going to have not just continuity, a government continuity of the central banks is what they're looking for. Again, a 9% inflation rate when they say their target is a 2% inflation rate.

Why should there be any inflation? It seems like to me 2% is even more than they should be reckoning at. But something that Tony Arteman mentioned yesterday when I had him on is what James Rickards is saying. The biggest monetary shock in 52 years is on its way. What Tony was talking about and James Rickards is alsoards is also saying the fact that the bricks nations are looking to have a gold-backed currency and what james rickards does not say but tony did i think it's very interesting the fact that the federal reserve is not accumulating gold the only central bank

that's not really interested in that because they're at war with gold. And this is a competition and everybody sees it. Ricard talks about the competition between the BRICS, who are going to be basing their system on gold, and the Western countries who are going to be basing their system on the fiat currency of the dollar. He says, I recently revealed that the so-called BRICS countries will announce the creation of a new currency at its annual Leaders Summit Conference, August 22nd through the 24th. So about a month away. This will be the biggest upheaval in international finance since 1971.

And it's taking direct aim at the dollar. What happened in 1971? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Well, that was the Bretton Woods 2. And that's when they decided that they would take us off the gold standard and they would create the petrodollar.

Because they've been cheating on the gold standard since Bretton Woods won. And everybody was on to the cheat. So they created Bretton Woods 2. He said, the world is unprepared for this geopolitical shockwave of BRICS creating a new currency. It appears likely that the new BRICS currency will be linked to a weight of gold. This plays to the strengths of the BRICS members, Russia and China. The two largest gold producers in the world also ranked sixth and seventh respectively among the 100 nations with gold reserves. And as Tony also said, you know, Russia and China are producing a lot of gold.

We don't even know how much gold they're producing. So, you know, they keep that secret. It's national security, right? If gold goes from $2,000 to $10,000 per ounce, he said, that's better understood as an 80% devaluation of the dollar. Gold keeps its values, dollar that is floating back and forth. And so if we see a big surge in that, it means that you've seen a big plummet in the value of the dollar. He said that would be a collapse of confidence, but you'll miss it if you're looking at euros

or at yen. Those currencies will all be collapsing at the same time. And he says, the only objective metric for the strength of the dollar is the dollar price of gold. And he says, and it's, um, this resolves any valuation conundrum. If you look at four different things, number one, dollar strength can only properly be measured in gold. Two, gold is money, but it's also a commodity. Three, bricks are dollar poor, but they are commodity rich. And four, a new bricks currency will be linked to gold.

He says, so what does this collapse of the dollar really mean? He says, it really means higher inflation and a much higher dollar price for gold. It means that other commodity prices will rise in lockstep. A commodity boom also favors bricks, generally speaking. And so he said, I had a reader who asked the question, isn't gold too volatile, he said, to support a currency? The person said, wouldn't a gold-backed currency require that gold be fixed at a certain price, like it was once fixed at $20 on the classic gold standard? He said, otherwise, it would lack the stability that a currency requires. The U.S. obviously doesn't want a rival currency bloc,

especially one led by Russia and China. They would have every motivation to sabotage it. The U.S., in conjunction with big banks, could create all kinds of havoc in the paper gold market to undercut gold prices. There really can't be two parallel gold markets, one fixed at a certain price and the other at one fluctuating constantly, he says. So he said, could we really have a gold-backed

currency with the BRICS? He said the volatility introduced by the paper market would render the underlying commodity unsuitable as a currency, which is meant to be stable. He says, am I missing something here? And so James Ricard says, well, he said, you're right, that the gold prices are manipulated. He gives his evidence. He said a PhD statistician that he spoke to once, who works for a large hedge fund, said he looked at the opening prices and the comics closing prices over a 10-year period. He was dumbfounded.

He said it was the most blatant case of manipulation that he'd ever seen. He said if you went into the aftermarket and you bought after close and then you sold before opening every day, you would make risk-free profits. He says statistically that's impossible, unless there's manipulation occurring. He said, but it's all going to be about weight. He said, there will never be two different prices for gold.

It's going to wind up being one price. And so he said, the BRICS currency will be valued in units of gold by weight. And so he said, if there's two different prices, they're going to equalize because of arbitrage. The Bricks currency will have a fixed gold value in weight. And so he says he thinks that China and Russia are likely to call the shots. And this is what is interesting about it. He said, so if you think about it, if the dollar price of gold goes up,

the Bricks will go up against the dollar. If the dollar price of gold goes down, the value of the BRICS will go down against the dollar. So he says, so if I'm a BRICS member and I'm trying to do importing, I want to buy U.S. goods and services on the cheap. And so he says, you know, you want to see a weaker dollar, but if I'm a BRICS member and a commodity exporter, I want to see this go down so that parties who have dollars will buy more of my commodities. So the problem is, does Russia and China need our stuff? We're blocking Russia from trading with us, and China makes our stuff. They're the exporters.

And so you can forget about this side of it where it's the importers. They don't care. They're not importing anything from us. That's been the problem for a long time, that they refuse to buy anything from us. They'll copy it. They'll use slave labor. They'll manipulate the exchange rates. They'll do all those types of things for the China price, but're not going to buy our stuff it's just export only and now russia um is um you know

they can't buy our stuff and they can't sell our stuff and they don't need to because as he points out they are heavily into commodities and they're also heavily into actually making things. You know, we have turned our empire into this virtual thing. We don't make anything real anymore. And that's a big problem. You can add a lot of value with information and you can add a lot of value with financialization, but ultimately everything's going to collapse if you don't have some real stuff underneath it. And if the people are actually making the stuff and the people actually have the raw materials,

don't want to keep supporting the system, they can pull the rug out from underneath us. And so as you look at this thing that's coming up in about a month, this BRICS thing, Emmanuel Macron said he would like to attend. Now he's not a member, France is not a member of the BRICS thing. Emmanuel Macron said he would like to attend. Now, he's not a member. France is not a member of the BRICS organization. And it's being held in South Africa. And they can determine, you know, they can determine if he's going to come or not. But Russia is very adamant that they don't want him there. They, I guess, maybe see him as a spy or something. Around 20 nations have reportedly formally applied to join BRICS or indicated that they're considering such a move,

but France is not one of them. And so the BRICS organization, which started as an informal economic group, currently lists, again, BRICS is Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, are full members. But a lot of people now, besides those, what is that, five? They are now got 20 people who want, 20 countries who want to join that. Rumble, Damage, thank you very much for the tip. He says, the Constitution does not and never has granted any rights to anyone that's right constitution spells out what rights you have as a conscious being sadly most people don't truly understand what a right is that's correct yeah declaration of independence laid it out that our rights come from god and the what the constitution does

is it specifically protects those rights you know's what the first eight are all about, that specifically, and even the 910th to a large degree, saying if we forgot anything, we're going to still assume there, and you have to have, you know, you have to have, if it's not explicitly a power given to the government, the federal government, they don't have it. It's retained by the states and by the people. And so, yes, we must always make sure that we don't fall in that trap of thinking that the Constitution gives us our rights. What it does is it protects our rights

from government infringement, especially the Second Amendment, and tells them they won't write any laws about the First Amendment. And that also means that they're not allowed to use partners in large companies as deputized censors for our stuff. Rumble, Dana in Alaska, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. And again, thank you Supra Faye for offering to match what people put out today. Very kind, all of you. Let's talk a little bit,

I said at the very beginning of the program, Brandon Smith, I've interviewed in the past, very good writer. By the way, before we get away from the gold, Tony Arterman, always been a big supporter and friend of this program and our friend, a friend to our family. And if you want to do something to protect yourself, as I said before, you know, the Republicans, Democrats are not going to protect you. You know, one of them wants to go to the IRS by a factor of nine. The other one wants to only grow up by a factor of seven. They got the IRS going around scooping up all kinds of records,

not just financial records for those of us, the little people. But of course, Hunter goes free while they come after the little people, while they come after their political enemies. But if you want to do something to get out of this system that I'm going to describe to you in a moment, regardless of what happens with inflation and the financial stuff, the important thing is to not be completely trapped into their system that they're trying to set up where you can't buy or sell or do anything without having their number, without having their central bank digital currency, without having their mark of the beast. And again, isn't it interesting that 2,000 years ago,

that would be described, what I'm going to read to you right now. And Brandon Smith is not doing this from a religious perspective. Like I said, in just a couple of paragraphs, when you string together all the stuff that the people at the World Economic Forum and other places have been talking about, what they want to do to us, what their ideal system looks like, what a nightmare this is. So Tony Arterbund at Wise Wolf Gold has kindly set up DavidKnight.Gold. And if you go there, that'll redirect you to his site. Let him know that you came through me.

And you can buy gold and silver. He might still do Bitcoin. I'm not sure. But gold and silver. And he even has a program for regular savings called the Wolf Pack. And you can start, I think, as small as $50 a month, and you can go up from there. He also works with somebody else to do gold and silver IRAs, that type of thing. So look out for yourself because the Republicans

and Democrats are not going to do it. Bottom line. Brandon Smith, the reset. When will globalists attempt to introduce their digital currency system? But before we look at the when, he takes a real sobering look at the what. And this is really key. So many people still don't understand. Like I said, 75% of the people don't even know what a CBDC is. He says, I want you to imagine for a moment a future world in which everything we now know about functioning and surviving within the economy is completely upended. We've gone fully digital, a cashless society where physical monetary interactions are abandoned or prohibited and replaced by CBDCs. And you'll be operating on the black market with gold and silver,

perhaps if you've got it. He says, by extension, what this looks like, by extension, production is overtly suppressed and micromanaged. Small businesses are a thing of the past, and only a select group of major corporations working directly with government are allowed to operate. It's not just that cash is outlawed and that everyone must rely on digital ledger. The very data pathways and networks

that we use to transfer funds are also controlled. But that first part there that he says, small businesses are a thing of the past. Only a select group of major corporations working directly with the government are allowed to operate. We saw that. We saw that. We got a taste of that in 2020 with Trump, the lockdown. Sorry, all you small businesses have to close. Not even doing anybody's hair, nothing, no small businesses, but the big box wall street companies are essential. You are non-essential. You have to close.

And to me, that was one of the biggest tells. One of the biggest outrages was to see Trump do that. That was the most Benedict Donald thing I'd ever seen. But of course it got, it kept getting worse. But when he dropped that handle, when he said small businesses are non-essential, and he started seeing them come after people, I remember Shelly Luther, who had the beauty parlor, single mom, small business, because again, we've pretty much been squeezed out of every kind of business, except for service businesses now, as a small business, because of federal regulation.

It's pretty much destroyed everything. Um, my dad, my uncle, uh, going back to my grandfather, they had a small manufacturing business. And, uh, I said, no, I'm not going to do that because I know that that's going to be regulated out of business. They were doing a private label, um, cosmetics and things like that. And, um, And some vitamin things and stuff like that. But, you know, they were not going to be allowed to stay in business. It was just amazing. I'm hearing the stories from my dad all the time.

And they've put out all those types of businesses out of business. And so that's one of the reasons I went into engineering. But when you look at what Trump did, it was the plan, no small businesses. And that is a key thing with this. Um, uh, before I get back, uh, rumble B slice. Thank you very much. It says, thanks David for contributing my sanity in an insane world. Well, thank you.

Yeah. It's, um, after reset my stuff, after looking deep into the abyss, it starts to look back at me, uh, after a period of time. Um, rumble Jason Barker. Thank you again, Jason. Uh, remind all that new Wolfpack members will get a free. Yes. Thank you. A free silver dollar until they're out. If you subscribe through David, yes. At any level, he's got it there. I think if you get in at a, at the highest level, but if we do it at any level, Tony will send you a free silver dollar. Thank you, Jason, for reminding me. I appreciate that very much. And, uh, thank you on rumble. Thank you, Frank. I appreciate that.

Uh, so we get rid of all the small businesses like Trump did to give us a taste of it. So we'd understand when they do it permanently, right? In the meantime, he says, AI based monitoring systems will sift through millions of transactions every minute searching for anomalies. This is the part we haven't seen yet, but it's coming. The algorithm is designed to identify anyone who has found a way around the data tracking. And they started pushing this tracking and the necessity for it from the very beginning, even before they started pushing the vaccine passports and things like that and the traffic light system that they got from China.

You know, they keep talking about Wuhan this and Wuhan that. No, what they took from China was the political stuff, the lockdowns, the traffic light system, the rest of that stuff. No, what they took from China was the political stuff, the lockdowns, the traffic light system, the rest of that stuff. That's what we took from China. They don't want you to see that, so they talk about the Wuhan biosafety lab, and they're not going to do anything

to stop the gain of function either. It's all just a show. He says the internet still exists, but it's a shell of its former glory in this dystopian future. The population uses it regularly to complete necessary tasks and research information, but the data providers are severely restricted. Cryptocurrencies are not an option as an alternative to CBDCs because all trading of them online immediately sets off red flags for the AI

in the sky. Only government-approved websites are allowed to exist, with extensive rules limiting what they can do and what they can say. AI chatbots provide the public with most of their information, and the globalists control the parameters of the chatbots. People only ever hear the news that the elites want them to hear. All contrary data is eliminated. It's not so much banned, rather it is simply omitted from the record until the people who remember it are long gone. Like Fahrenheit 451, right?

Yeah, we'll destroy all the books, we'll destroy all the information, all the records, we'll memory hole them. We'll burn the books. And it'll just be word of mouth that goes along. This is a big part of what Obama was talking about, the digital fingerprints, bringing in this long program that Microsoft and DARPA have been working on in conjunction with Intel and with Adobe,, um, Adobe, you know, getting the hardware manufacturers, CPU manufacturers, the software manufacturers to join

together with the media police, the news police, like the New York times, BBC, the Washington post, those types of people, and to have them mark, this is the digital fingerprints, what Obama calls it, the digital fingerprint. They're ready to roll this out, they're coming up with their marketing terms, but basically to mark anything that you create, whether it is text or a picture or audio or audio-video, they'll mark any of it and shut it down before it even gets out there. So everything will be omitted from the record,

and all we'll have is the word of mouth to pass things along. He says, this all might sound like science fiction, but all of this technology already exists. And it's currently being tested by global institutions, including the Bank for International Settlements and the IMF. The primary stepping stone, says Brandon Smith, to this dystopian nightmare would be a global digital currency system. What I've said for the longest time,

there's a lot of different ways that we can get there. They've got a lot of backdoor, mark of the beast types of things that they can do to us, but the direct path is CBDC. And this is why they're spending so much time on us, why Biden put out an all-of-government report system. Every one of you are going to report back to me in one of four ways. What's this new financial system going to look like? How are we going to implement it in the code?

How are we going to enforce it? And then the fourth thing was, how are we going to sell it? Oh, we're going to use climate change to sell it so that's going to be the primary stepping stone he says without a cashless society the globalists would have no power to enforce the other elements of the reset this is why it's central but when and how they will implement this monstrosity and why would anybody embrace it? He says, you know, they tend to work incrementally, right? But sometimes they exploit dramatic crisis events in order to frighten the population into compliance

with the policies that would have taken them decades to institute otherwise. And this is what happened with the pandemic. It's what Fauci did, right? How do we get what we want? He wanted instant approval of vaccines and stuff, but it applies to any of this stuff. We do it from the inside.

You do it with disruption, but then you also do it iteratively, right? And so what Brandon Smith is saying is that, you know, they've got a, they consistently mentioned the year 2030. They call this a contract to transform our world by 2030. That's the way the WEF responds to it. And so they got to get this thing done by 2030. And as Brandon says, this even included, as we saw during the pandemic,

we had consistent talk about how we had to have a cashless society to prevent the spread of COVID on physical dollars. And remember, Gerald Slenty has always talked about that.

You know, he did that as a cover. Dirty cash and digital trash. He talks about that all the time. And he got it right. You're telling me that the money is too dirty. I'm going to get diseased. I'm going to cooties if I touch this.

Cooties or covidies or whatever if I touch this stuff. So the cash is dirty. We got to go to digital trash. And he's right. By the way, Gerald Slenty, um, trends journal, always ahead of the trend that,

uh, again, you know, three, three years or so ago, dirty, dirty cash, digital trash.

Uh, you can get 10% off of, um, and again, he, uh, helps us. If you,

uh, get it using the code name night, it helps you helps us. It's a win-win situation. Because he knows that once you see Trends Journal, you're really going to like it. It's a great publication, and he's always ahead of the curve. Most globalist organizations consistently mention the year 2030, says Brandon. And, of course, the reason for that, and he doesn't mention it here,

but the reason for that is the fourth turning. They're exploiting a natural occurrence, a natural cycle that happens in our society once every 70 to 80 years. And it was identified by Strauss and Howe back in the early 90s. came up with all this generational cyclical view of history that everybody's constantly referring to when they talk about um you know the millennials or gen x or y or gen z and all this other kind of stuff that was all started by Strauss and Howe and they looked at the big uh changes that we've seen in American history you know world war ii and the great depression prior to that civil war prior to that revolutionary war but they went back for 500 years in American history, you know, World War II and the Great Depression, prior to that, Civil War, prior to that, the Revolutionary War. But they went back for 500 years in English history because America was synchronized in that timing with the British, and they saw a pattern that happened. You know, when you have a big disruption, a big chaos, a big war, and all this

kind of stuff, the people who fight the war have a different attitude, don't they? After the war, it changes people, changes their perspective. They have a different attitude than their children do. And then that next generation, that's two generations from the big catastrophe. They have an even more identifiable, you know, so there's this, this repetition about every four generations, everything gets changed, and you change the institutions. And sometimes it's for the better, usually it's for the worse. And it always has an economic component to it, but it usually has a war component to it as well.

And so they said, first they did generations, that was early 90s, and then about 90, what and then about 93, 94, something like that, they did the fourth turning. And they said that sometime in the mid-2000s, we would have some kind of global economic event. Well, it turned out to be true. 2007, 2008, you had the Great Recession. They said that would kick off the fourth turning and that the fourth turning

would be completed about 2029. So that's why these people are saying by 2030, we're going to have our new society because they expect that you're going to be left in the dark and ignorant about what their plans are, even though they put them out in public, nobody wants to believe it. It sounds too crazy to dystopian. And so you're going to ignore it to our peril, many people in the public, and they'll be able to get away with it, even though they put it out there in public.

And they're going to have this system in place by 2030. So Brandon Smith says this means the establishment wants to have their control grid in place within seven years or less, six and a half years right now. That means that they take us down and then have their control grid in place. And all that has happened in the next six or seven, six and a half years. He says that would be impossible without a bone rattling crisis of epic

proportions. So brace yourself. It's coming. Yeah. Get your relationship right with God, with your family, with your community, because it's coming. They're going to pull it off. I repeat that, a bone-rattling crisis of epic proportions. Strauss and Howell have warned us. Brandon Smith is warning us. I'm warning you. Yeah, it's going to be different this time, right? Oh, yeah.

And I'm not going to die. Not even if I go down in that little sub. I'm not going to die. You know, we all want to lie to ourselves about the future. Anyway, he said, but first they would have to introduce a number of future mechanisms as a trial run before they do the chaos from the inside, the bone-rattling crisis of epic proportions. That way, when the disaster does occur, the public will be acclimated to the solutions that the elites will ask them to adopt later. This is why I said all along, I said this, you know, these vaccine passports and all the rest of this is mark of the beast because it's acclimating people to it. It's, it's training you that way, right?

It's training you for that system. Yeah. It's a system that's going to work like that. It's going to be more pervasive and permanent, but they're showing you what this is going to be. It's a temporary taste of it. They can pull back and then come again at you with it because you've been, they've moved the Overton window. They've normalized this thing.

They've acclimated you to this. And that's the key thing. You've got to be acclimated to it. So they're going to do, they've got their system there. They're going to do some trial runs. You know, they did a trial run of rolling out CBDC in Nigeria. They said, oh, they've got a lot of people for an African nation. They've got a relatively high number of people who are using crypto.

So let's try it with them. Let's try to impose a cashless society on them. And they all said, no, not going to do it. And so that's their trial run. They're going to do things a little bit differently now. Uh, and they're trying it in these various countries. And they're all putting together their systems right now. He says conversion to a cashless system would require calamity and force.

Small businesses would have to be removed from the picture, leaving only major corporations. Or as Trump put it, the essentials. The essential people. There's another rather blunt way to push America into CBDCs that the globalists seem to be expediting, the death of the dollar's world reserve currency status. Only five years ago, skeptics argued that the dollar would be king for many decades to come. You still see some people saying that. What's his name? Darren Beattie at Revolver. Oh, he's, you know,

dollar I'll be here forever. We're great. MAGA, America. It's great. Yeah. Okay. Well, it's not a view I share. If we take the globalist timeline

of 2030 as an effective limiter, says Brandon, this would mean another crisis, even more pervasive than the COVID pandemic would have to take place soon in order for the elites to get what they want. The longer they wait, the more people become educated about their agenda and the less likely they will have success. And that's the key thing. You know, we, we want to be in a situation where, um, the Jonah was in, you know, where you weren't, everybody's going to happen. People take action and then it doesn't happen. It's like, and then they all point the finger, point the finger at

you and laugh. You told us this was going to happen. It was because, uh, you, you followed through on this stuff. Uh, we, uh, we want to have that kind of a situation. Rockfin, Guard Goldsmith. Thank you very much, Guard. I appreciate the tip. He says, hi, David. Jason beat me to it regarding Wise Wolf. They were going to both help me with that.

I'm horrible at doing plugs. And as we head to a beautiful weekend, I want to thank you for touching on these key issues. Well, thank you very much. It harkens to my days of reading dystopia and science fiction, yet it's becoming. Yeah, yeah, isn't that awful? It's a blueprint.

All this stuff is a blueprint. As I said, every day is like opening up another dystopian novel. It's like, oh, yeah, I remember when I read that novel. Now they're trying to do that. And again, Gard, you can catch him on Rockfin. Liberty Conspiracy. And it's every night. Is the time 7 o'clock, I think?

Is that when it is? Do you know, Travis? Well, Guard will tell us if I didn't get the time right. And I'll make sure I've still got a little bit of time to talk. But I think it's 7 o'clock every night. And by the way, this is Friday. So, you know, tomorrow you've got Nights of the Storm at 10 o'clock every night. And by the way, this is Friday. So, you know, tomorrow you got, um, nights of the storm at, uh, 10 o'clock. Um, and that's, uh, um, that's Jason Barker, angry tiger. And, uh, you can see the schedule for their programs and guards program and my

program and a lot of other programs. You can see that if you go to their website at nights of the storm, they've set up like a, a programming, a programming schedule there, which is really nice. I'm glad they did that. Yeah, there are some good people out there. They're struggling to get this thing going and support them as well. Support them by watching and supporting them financially, putting out their information as well.

We've got to get this information. It's essential. That's Trump. It's essential that we know what these people are trying to pull on us because that's the real danger. On Rockfin, Stephen Kaspar, thank you very much. And also on Rockfin, Shea B., thank you. And say thank you, David and family,

for all you do to promote common sense and telling the rest of the story. You're the Paul Harvey of our generation. Well, that's really kind. I really do respect Paul Harvey. It was always fascinating to hear his stories. Maloney, I went to DMV this week for car and driver's license, and there was this poster about Real ID. What is that? Will it be effective in 2025 real id has been kicking around for a while and real id is um again stepping up all your

identification and you know more database stuff and more biometric type of things and when we came here to get our license here, they have the Gold Star that they give you. I mean, it was a ton of paperwork. I wasn't given an option of getting the less than real ID. I'd like a virtual ID. How about that? I want to identify as a fuzzy or something. That was not an option. They demanded all kinds of stuff.

And it wasn't enough that we had a certified copy of our marriage license. They demanded all kinds of stuff. And it wasn't enough that we had a certified copy of our marriage license or any of this kind of stuff. No, no, you can't have that as ID. I got to have this other stuff. And so we had to find their preferred forms of ID. And then they, we went through all that stuff and said, now you've got a gold star. And that means that when this thing starts to roll out next year or 2025 or whenever it was, they were supposed to roll it out this year. They're supposed to start requiring this type of ID for you to fly on a plane, but they delayed it a year, I think, so I think it's next year.

But if you got this gold star, that means that we really vetted you, and all of a sudden it's like, great, great. I know another society that gave people gold stars. I know what came after the gold star as well, don't you? So anyway, that's where they are. We've got the TSA that's rolling out facial biometrics at a lot of different airports. They're going to start making it mandatory to do that as well.

It is very concerning. We're about to run out of time, so I'm not going to take a break. I want to talk real quickly. I don't have too much time to do it. Why are scientists concerned about 5G? And this is an article from the Epoch Times, and it is from a series called The Invisible Hazards in Your Hands. But unfortunately, a lot of times these 5G hazards, health hazards,

are not simply in your hands. You know, we have seen a lot of times these 5G hazards, health hazards, are not simply in your hands. You know, we have seen a lot of studies, and I talk about this in this article, studies out of Sweden and other places, where they see an increase in brain tumors in people who use their phone a great deal. You know, you're like a real estate agent or something like that. You're constantly on the phone, mobile phone with people.

They see brain tumors on that side where they hold the phone. So that is, you know, it's just a coincidence, I'm sure, as Fauci would say. But it's real. But think about the fact that most people don't hold the phones to their head that much. But what do you do? You put it in your pocket. And that's some very valuable territory there as well in terms of the propagation of humanity. So if they want to sterilize people, yeah. Who would have thought? I guess we can see this coming out from the NIH.

The NSA said, who would have thought in 1984, and they showed the picture of the Apple 1984 Macintosh commercial, who would have thought in 1984 that this would be Big Brother, and they showed the iPhone with Steve Jobs, and then the third slide that they had and the Snowden documents, they said, and that the zombies would line up to pay for it themselves. And so I guess we could have the NIH saying, you know, who would have thought that this and hold up the cell phone, that this would become the sterilizing effect and that the

zombies would line up to pay for it and stick it in their pockets all day long. You know, if you've got to carry one of those things, you could at least put it in some kind of a Faraday pouch type of thing. Keep them from tracking you and keep it from sterilizing you. But, you know, 5G, Trump loved 5G. He was always pushing 5G. You remember that? And I guess, you know, in his freedom cities, we would all have 5G stuff.

It is a health concern. But, of course, Trump doesn't care about health. I mean, we've got things that are more important than health. We've got to do this fast. You know, we've got to have a warp speed, fast broadband Internet. And they've got to have it because you're part of the Internet of things that they want to track and because they have to have eyes on everybody all the time and uh so you know that was always a concern he was very concerned and i said at the time i said they want to say that it's a conspiracy theory that they're going to make malevolent surveillance state use out of 5g

and yet what are they so concerned about we can't let the Chinese have control of this thing because they'll know everything that we're doing. Oh, so if you have control of it, you're going to know everything that we're doing. Oh, but that's fine because that's the U.S. government. We don't mind if the U.S. government spies on us and everybody else in the world, right? Now, they admitted that it was all about surveillance

and their paranoia about China. And yet, they want to say that it is not anything that we need to be concerned about. And they also want to poo-poo all the health issues, the same way that they did with the vaccine, the same way that Trump is still doing with the vaccine. I just absolutely could not believe that when I saw him with Brett Baier this week. Oh, yeah, it was great. All his talking points again, talking about that.

And then talking about how he couldn't fire Fauci. Give me a break. Uh, so anyway, so when you look at the non-industry sponsored research, it's about three to one, uh, three out of every four papers show a negative health effect from the 5g. But then when you look at the research that's funded by the telecommunications industry, it's the opposite. Only about one out of every four papers shows an effect.

And of course, we've seen this. This is the big pharma effect as well. Every time you see them do their studies, right, you can have three different companies that are creating a drug for the same condition, and they've got three competing drugs. And so they hire people to do their studies. And if brand A hires the people to do their study for brand A, guess what?

Brand A is best, is better than brand B and brand C. And then when you see the brand B people do it, they do the same thing. They always have their study, always shows their product is so much better than everybody else that's what we're seeing from these things as well and so um you know i don't have time to go into this but it is kind of interesting the arguments are and this is why i said it would tie back in for the titanic thing and the uh radiation from the sky um sky network of um musk uh it doesn't penetrate that deeply. And so they're saying, well, it may be safer than these earlier forms of electromagnetic radiation that we've got out there already.

But it's a lot more dense. And we haven't done any tests. That's the key thing. Well, we're out of time. And I just want to thank again, thank Faye so much. Thank you, Supra Faye. That was such a kind thing to do. And I know that you support the program in many other ways as well.

So thank you so much for that. I appreciate that. And thank you for all of you supporting the program the last couple of days. We are overwhelmed. Thank you very much. Have a good weekend. Joe, we've got a problem. What?

Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right? So, basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because, basically, you can't hold coffee with your hands, right? I'm a scat in the... But anyone tries to mug me, I'm be ready for it. You dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world.

This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we own the world. These people, they're supporting free speech with every mug they buy. Come on. These people, they're supporting free speech with every month they buy. Come on. These people, I tell you, well, anyway. You're listening to The David Knight Show.