The David Knight Show - 24Apr23 Jabs Still Killing People and One Country Takes Notice; Mail Order Abortions Killing the Mother Too

Episode Date: April 24, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Congresswoman Nancy Mace (R-SC), Trump and big GOP donors say "extremist" pro-lifers cost GOP elections. Is "middle ground" a winning position? 3:43Supreme Court temporarily preserves access to abortion pill WITHOUT PHYSICIAN EXAMINATION while litigation plays out — dramatically increasing the possibility of aborting the mother as well as the child 10:55Democrat-run Oregon has stockpiled a three-year supply of abortion pills. 15:15RFK Jr is anti-war he says. But what about abortion? Is abortion a lesser issue? It depends on whether "in God we trust" or "in the presidency we trust"? 18:29Nancy Pelosi — gone but still blabbing about her ideas of "liberty" from the "founders" 26:32Euthanasia is different from assisted suicide and it's about to be approved in the Netherlands FOR CHILDREN (with parental consent - for now) 34:06Even humanists understand the danger of euthanasia 36:57A newborn baby was medically kidnapped in Texas last month because the parents chose to have a home birth with a licensed midwife and treat jaundice (a common condition that affects 60% of newborns and is easily treated with light) 46:32Boris Johnson, BoJo the Clown, referred to himself as "The Fuhrer" and "The King". 50:33 A terminally ill Alberta woman is being refused what the hospital believes is life-saving treatment because she is unvaccinated 55:34Tennessee says no to vaccinating children without parental consent. 1:00:47 The “mature minor doctrine” — what it says, why it's wrong, and why the Tennessee fight has national implications as an attack against the institution of family and parental rights 1:02:59Confidence in childhood vaccination has plummeted by up to 44% Not a single vaccine on the childhood vaccine schedule has been safely tested prior to being approved. DTP vaccine killed more people than the disease did prior to the introduction of the jab 1:11:30 Vaccine injuries are becoming a dominant theme in the media in Germany. 1:21:09 Face masks may raise the risk of testicular dysfunction, cognitive decline and still births. 1:26:58 Who is the ONLY Republican Senator who concerned about vaccine injuries? 1:35:13The climate MacGuffin is at the center of so many things, a foundational issue, not simply one issue 1:42:18Make "Earth Day" Religious Holiday for Pagans? After 50 years of false prophecies, the suicide depopulation cult should be commemorated somehow. Environmentalists have their gods who are fiercely worshipped — and their religious rules they DEMAND YOU OBEY 1:44:24 The Environmental Protection Agency has become the Emissions Prohibition Agency and it is the "emissions" that they claim give them the authority to "omit" everything in our lives. 1:51:09 What religions do to help us form community and mark life’s important benchmarks and how the pagan's view is antithetical to these milestones and the family 1:58:10 Auto-trader’s “Road to 2030”: even a site that sells used cars pushes the globalist agenda. 2:13:14 Covid capitalism pales in comparison to the looting of the middle class by the "greenwashed" profits for Banks and corporations 2:20:28"Extinction Rebellion" co-founder outed as FLAGRANT HYPOCRITE - caught in the act 2:22:44 Pentagon’s humiliation just grew deeper as it turns out National Guard airmen has been leaking documents since the start the Russian invasion 2:35:55 Ukraine demands 1% of GDP — how much is that from USA. And, they want ALL countries to give 1% of GDP. 2:40:00 New York Times: The Right to Keep & Bear "Bear Spray" Sounds stupid, and it is 2:43:11 MSM doesn't want to talk about the last 2 mass murderers being leftists undergoing therapy. And, the absurd explanation from FBI about keeping the Tranny-Killer's Manifesto hidden 2:49:29 "What is an assault weapon"? ATF Director can't answer 2:58:46Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Come on, come on, yes, yes, come on. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Oh, curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering.

No, we bet. More power to you. T&C Supply 18 Plus. Bet responsibly. Gamblingcare.ie. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered.

Visit Innovate today. Innovate. The IT solutions people. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 24th of April, year of our Lord, 2023. You may think that the MacGuffin is over, the pandemic MacGuffin. We'll show you today that it isn't. However, the tide is turning in a big way in Germany, for example. So we're going to take a look at that. We're going to take a look at what the, so we had Earth Day over the weekend.

We had it on Saturday. And the New York Times responded that we need to have Earth Day as a religious holiday. I've been telling you for a long time that it is a religion. How many times do they need to admit that this is a religion based on 50 years of false prophecies? We'll be right back. Stay with us. So so Yeah, we're going to talk about climate change and these people admitting that they see it as a religion. And we need to understand that even if they do it in a way that is kind of tongue-in-cheek, they really are worshiping the earth.

They really do think of it as this wonderful, miraculous accident. Many of them even talk about it as being sentient. That's a common view in the lunatic Hollywood crowd. Mother Earth is angry with us. I mean, they're serious about that. You see Jennifer Lawrence and other people, you know, this is why we're having all these hurricanes and everything. We've offended the earth and we humans are a virus and we need to be exterminated, extinguished. This has been the case since the very first earth day, Paul Ehrlich book was the population bomb. It has always been

at the foundation of all of this. Now,, Nixon created the EPA to get rid of pollution. These people wanted to get rid of people. They wanted to get rid of the population, not pollution. And I had a very good friend in high school. We still remained friends even long after high school, but he was always focused on population control. And that was why he was all about the Green Movement and that type of thing. But let's begin with the move towards population control that we call abortion

from planned un-parenthood. And let's begin with the Republicans who see this as a political issue. We had a Supreme Court case at the end of the week on Friday. We had the Supreme Court say we're going to leave in place the new rules from the FDA saying that you can dispense abortion pills by mail over the counter. The key thing, you don't have to have a doctor's examination to determine if it's safe for the mother. And the left really loves this because this gives them an opportunity to abort both the

baby and the mother at the same time. You can kill both of them, two for one shot. And so you have Nancy Mace, who is a Republican from South Carolina, went on ABC's Sunday show yesterday and said, unless we find, quote, middle ground on abortion, Republicans will lose huge in 2024. Let me just say, there is no compromise on the issue of murdering babies. This is not something that is, and it shouldn't be any compromise in terms of the Constitution either. The Supreme Court got it right finally. They didn't stop abortion. They said they stopped the federal government involving itself into an area of life in which they have no authority to involve themselves.

They have no authority to define marriage. They have no authority to define marriage. They have no authority to define life. And they have constantly evolving positions on all of those things. It should not be up to them. That's what they're upset about. And so even if you look at it from a pragmatic standpoint, this is a losing position for Republicans. It's what caused Trump's left-leaning LGBT celebrity crowd to lose the elections.

It was because they had paraded around, but, oh yeah, we're pro-life and so forth. And they busily started scrubbing their websites like Blake Masters in Arizona as soon as the Supreme Court decision came out. They were gutless. They were spineless. They are rhinos. They're celebrities selected by Trump, and that's why they lost. It's not hard to defend innocent life. The facts are on your side.

Morality is on your side. Why do they have such a hard time doing this well of course and i mentioned this because what you see nancy mace saying is what all the gop donors are saying saying uh desantis you know you're you're moving you're banning pornographic books for kids you're banning the murder of babies what's the matter with you you got to lighten up man we don't want a GOP like that. The GOP has been like that for a long time. Now we can finally see it. And so you either defend life and the Constitution or just get out.

I don't really care if you stay there. We got Democrats who can do what you're trying to do, right? The Democrats have already taken that position. We need somebody who's going to be pro-life. Mace said, well, it was the right decision on Friday night by the Supreme Court. Martha Raddatz says, but this isn't over. There are other cases moving through the court system. How do you see this ending up?

How do you want this to end up? Nancy Mace says, well, I want us to find some middle ground as a Republican and a conservative, constitutional conservative, who is pro-life, but you don't want to defend life? You're incapable of talking about what's going on here? How many of these people, did Nancy Mace defend your right to not put on a mask, your health choices, to not have an injection? Of course not. It's always the same.

All these people who scream, my body, my choice, took away every choice of yours about what to do with your body. What to put on your body. Where your body can go. And demanding that you put things into your body. Genetic code injections. These people are raving hypocrites and they need to get out let them lose i don't care if a democrat replaces them get people like nancy mace out we don't need the judgment of god on us in addition to everything else

so she said um we're going to lose huge. If we continue down this path of extremities, no extremism in defense of Liberty is no vice. And guess what? You can't have Liberty. If you don't have life, Thomas Jefferson always connected the two. And of course he puts life before Liberty and the declaration of independence, because, independence because you can't have liberty if you're not alive if they take your life right he also said the god this is jefferson the god that gave us life gave us liberty at the same time the hand of force can disjoin uh can destroy but cannot disjoin them. So you can separate life and liberty only if you destroy them. Only if you destroy them, which is what these people are trying to do. It's what they've been trying

to do before the lockdown, but ever since the lockdown as well. The two cannot be separated. And there is no point in talking about extremism when you're protecting life and liberty. Be extreme. Moderation is no virtue in protecting life and liberty. And we're going to talk about that. There's an interesting case, Washington Post, so upset. And they keep coming back to the fact that the people who took over this republican

county in michigan that locked them down during the fake pandemic they had election and they took it over a new crowd of people who had not been involved in politics before and i don't know how christian they are but the washington post you know belabors the point tries to make them sound like religious extremists but they have they took this over to fight against this because they have a moral backbone and because they saw what was being done to life and to liberty and why boy, the Washington Post just had a fit. Drudge had it up all weekend. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods.

Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you.

T&C Supply 18+. Bet responsibly. GamblingCare.ie. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting, and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. It's about a 25-page article recounting all the details. Oh, you got this new person who led this

group of city councilors to take over the county commission, and look at how religious they are, and so forth. Yeah, yeah. You need to have something that is going to, something other than some kind of a Machiavellian calculation to keep yourself in office. And of course, the first thing they did, and what the central fight now is, is over their firing of the public health bureaucrats that did that to them. First, they got rid of the GOP establishment that let the public health dictators do

that to them. And now as the first thing they did was to come in and to do that. So what did the Supreme court do on Friday? Well, they temporarily preserved access to the abortion pill, as I said before, so that you can, without an exam,

so that you can kill both mother and child. Planned unparenthood. An administrative stay that preserves access to the abortion pill while the litigation plays out in lower courts. And of course, they point out in this article that it was Bill Clinton who first approved Mephistopheles. We'll just call it Mephistopheles. He approved Mephistopheles. He approved Mephistopheles. That's a better phrase. He did that in 2000. And then you have Biden allowing the pill to be sent through the mail in 2021.

But that's not the key thing. The key thing is without a physical exam to determine the size of the baby. If you abort the baby that way, you can kill the mother. The only two who pushed back against this in a dissent were, of course, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. And forget about the Trump Supreme Court justices. It truly is interesting that that went through. And, of course, Kavanaugh and Roberts really didn't want that to go through. I'm sure and I'm absolutely positive that Roberts was a leaker.

Absolutely. I said it from the very beginning. And as time goes on and there's no investigation, I'm all the more certain that it was John Roberts. And Kavanaugh is just like him. But of course, the other two that were appointed to Gorsuch and Barrett, they were on the side of letting this thing go through. As narrowed by the, this is what Alito wrote, as narrowed by the court of appeals, a stay that would apply if we failed to broaden it would not remove Mephistopheles from the market. It would simply restore the circumstances that existed from 2000 to 2016 under three

presidential administrations. Our granting of a stay of a lower court decision is an equitable remedy. It should not be given. That means the lower court decision was in Texas where they said stop it. So he said that was an equitable remedy. It should not be given if the moving party has not acted equitably, and that is the situation here. The FDA has engaged in what has become the practice of leveraging district court injunctions

as a basis for implementing a desired policy while evading both necessary agency procedures and judicial review. Yeah, the FDA doesn't like its own procedures, you noticed, with the warp speed stuff and everything else uh interestingly enough the um uh the uh majority seven people didn't say anything really to defend it they're pretty much silent so um again temporarily preserve access without an exam to this abortion pill. The pro-abortion ruling, which was not explained, not explained, was decided in a 7-2 vote with Thomas and Alito as the dissenting voices. A November 2021 study by Charlotte Lozier Institute scholars

appears in a peer-reviewed journal, Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology. They said they analyzed state Medicaid data of over 400,000 abortions from 17 states that fund elective abortions through their Medicaid programs. They found that the rate of abortion pill-related emergency room visits increased over 500% from 2002 through 2015. So going from two years after they were approved by Bill Clinton through 2015, it went up by 500%. The rate of emergency room visits for surgical abortions also increased during the same period, but by a much smaller margin. But now they're going to

be doing this without an exam. You see? And that is the key thing. Democrat-run Oregon has stockpiled a three-year supply of abortion pills. They're worried about that. Worried about that. Places that won't let you have HCQ or ivermectin, right?

That there's a lot of evidence that they were effective, could have been, should have been allowed use off-label because they both had decades-long history of people using them on a regular basis. Billions of doses used. So they knew what the safety profile was. There was absolutely no reason to allow people to not have it if you were concerned about a pandemic,

which is another indication of the whole thing was fake early on. But these people now want to have a supply of abortion pills, at least three years, a Democrat Oregon governor, Tina Kotech. Whoa, what was that? Something really hit in my ear there.

A three-year supply amounts to enough pills to end the lives of more than 22,000 unborn babies. The Alliance Defending Freedom are the ones behind this lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of four national medical associations, doctors associations, which has, and several doctors alleging that the agency chose politics over science and approved chemical abortion drugs for use in the United States. Well, of course that's what we have come to see with the FDA.

It's all politics. There's no science between any of this stuff. There's no science because they're not even testing any of this stuff for safety or for advocacy. How can you say there's science when you don't do any testing, right? What is science? What is science about? Well, you have a hypothesis. Or in this particular case, you said that somebody's hypothesis is, well, I think we've got something here that's going to be safe and effective. Well, let's test that hypothesis. Show me your data. Well, let's collect the data.

Let's run some tests. Let's let this run out over the usual period of time. No, we don't do any of that. It's all politics. No science. It's all behavioral science and politics. So they said the lawsuit points to six discrete agency actions since the legalization of Mephistopheles and asked the court to hold the agency's actions unlawful. Now I focus on this.

Why do I focus on this as the very first thing with all the other issues happening? You know, I understand where Gerald Sinti is coming from in terms of RFK. We look at, for instance, war. That's the big issue, right? A big issue. And Gerald understands that as they melt everything down, people are starting to look at this and say, wait a minute, I don't want to eat bugs and I don't want to be locked down in my house. I don't want to have my home and my car taken away and eat bugs and all the rest of a minute, I don't want to eat bugs and I don't want to be locked down in my house. I don't want to have my home and my car taken away and eat bugs and all the rest of this stuff. I don't want to be, uh, tracked and traced with everything that I do everywhere. Well, okay. Well, uh, they don't like that. Let's have a war. They'll let us reset the table.

Right. I understand that. I understand that. And so when you look at RFK, I don't see another candidate out there who's really pushing against the war. You know, forget about Trump. He's just a bunch of hot air. I don't trust anything the man says. I don't understand why anybody would trust anything the man says. But I understand where Gerald is coming from. But let me just say this.

You know, as Christians, we don't put our hope in horses and chariots or in planes or nuclear bombs or in politicians in the White House, right? Our trust is in God. And we better get these things right first and foremost. What has RFK Jr. said about abortion? Zip. Zero. Nothing. He's running as a Democrat.

What do you think his position is on that? As a Kennedy, what do you think his position is on that? I know what his position is on the environment, and it is a religion to him. That's one of the reasons why I read that speech to you on Thursday, I guess it was, some of the excerpts from it. I'd played some excerpts. I guess maybe it was Friday.

I'd, I'd played excerpts on Thursday. It was on Wednesday that he did it. And then when I read you the excerpts, I told you how he viewed nature. He talks about nature, right? He sees God in nature and God reveals himself to us through nature. Maybe sometimes he reveals himself to us in some of these wise philosophical religious books. None in particular come to mind from him, but God really does reveal himself to us in nature. He's everywhere in nature. This is just nothing but paganism. It's nothing but paganism.

And the fundamental thing you need to understand but paganism. It's nothing but paganism. And the fundamental thing you need to understand about paganism, there was an excellent article about paganism. I read it. I had someone At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't

placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham And on top of that, we're paying up to 7 places each way on selected races throughout the festival I declare this a most generous offering NoviBet, more power to you T&C Supply 18 Plus, bet responsibly, gamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland.

From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security innovate has you covered visit innovate today, innovate the it solutions people. Uh, refer it to me as well. I was linked on drudge as well.

Um, and they were talking about how we're going into paganism and why do we talk about paganism in the way that uh that we do it is antithetical to christianity antithetical to judaism to any religion because in paganism is just do whatever you want there's no rules there's no standards right uh there is no moral standard now you can still have people who will do the moral thing because there is such a thing as natural rights as human beings we come with some understanding of certain things we understand that murder is wrong things like cannibalism are wrong, even though

in some societies they've been normalized. But most people instinctively understand that it's wrong to do that. It's wrong to steal, things like that. So there is what a lot of libertarians would call natural law. And they would make a distinction between natural law and things like, you can't go 35 miles an hour in this area here. These are arbitrary rules that are put out there. But it's different from the fundamental moral law that is there. And a lot of people understand with this moral, you have an understanding of that,

even if you don't have a religious text now you again you can be conditioned out of it this is even people with a religious text can be conditioned out of their moral teachings as well but you're born with that I believe that firmly believe that a lot of anthropologists believe that as well a lot of pagan libertarians believe that as well so you know there is a moral code that we understand certain things are wrong uh but um uh it is malleable if you don't believe that you are accountable to a god and if you don't believe that god has spoken i know that sounds very strange to a lot of people who look at it why would i think that god has spoken through this old book well there's a lot of reasons there are prophetic reasons many prophecies fulfilled and we have the archaeological and the dating to show that a lot of these prophecies were made in documents that were centuries old before they happened we have archaeological um issues to verify that it's not just a fairy tale story

that was rooted in history that was a major line of criticism in the early 1800s when they hadn't done any archaeology and then archaeology became through the middle through the rest of the 1800s latter part of it it became get the Bible and look at that as a manual as to where to go. Find things like the Temple of Diana and stuff like that. I remember the British Museum, going through it with my son, and because we had, one of the boys was sick, I took the other one and went through and we looked at the stone tablets

that were talking about Sennacherib invading Judah, all the stuff that was laid out in the Bible, and there it was, they found it. Finding the part of the pedestal of the Temple of Diana in Ephesus. Unbelievable how big it was. It was just a tiny little fragment. It was gigantic.

Bigger than this room. And just a little corner of the pedestal. It's rooted in history. It's proven by philosophy. It hangs together as a unified whole. And we all know. We can see God's work in creation, not an accident that is here. And so when we look at this, we have Pelosi, again, talking about this abortion issue.

She says, reversing freedom in our country is what the GOP is doing, and it's what the Supreme Court is doing. Reversing freedom in our country. Because the Supreme Court said, well, the decision about when life begins and what abortion is going to be, that's something that belongs to the state governments, not to us. They did not overturn it. They kicked it back to the states, which is where constitutionally it always belonged. But these are the Democrats who call evil good and good evil. And we have to understand that if we're going to do that, if we're going to embrace infanticide in this country, if we're going to embrace euthanasia as they're doing across Europe,

then nothing is going to protect us. We don't need to have some idiot like Biden in the White House to create a world war and to destroy this country. God can use anybody to do that if we're going to put these things at the back end and if the Republican Party is going to throw out concerns about abortion and other issues. So that's one of the things I'm concerned about. You look at DeSantis. And again, I criticize DeSantis on how far he's gone into these things. A lot of half measures that he's done. But one of the concerns about DeSantis that I haven't really talked about,

other people have talked about it, is the fact that he was at Gitmo. And you have prisoners who said that, you know, hey, he's there while they were torturing us, and he's over there joking with some guys. I'll never forget that guy's face. And when I saw it, the press was like, whoa. Do you think he's going to be working with the military industrial complex? Yes. But he's also taken the lead on these moral issues.

So where is the calculus on that? I think it depends on whether you trust God. If you put the issues in the right order. And the importance of a presidential campaign is so that we can have a national discussion on these issues. When I talk about what happens in this Michigan County later, that's what I'm always talking about when I say the solution is local. The local people. This is Michigan.

We had Whitmer. They suffered under that stuff and they said, never again are we going to do that. And so if you've got a bad governor, if you've got a bad president, you've got a bad governor like Whitmer, you've got a bad president like Trump who will lock you down and pay for it, for Whitmer to lock you down, the solution is local. But we need to have this discussion about what's happening on the national level. So, Nancy Pelosi said, You've seen us move to expand freedom in our country, Democrats.

We are very proud the last term to have marriage equality with respect for marriage act passed. Then you see the Supreme Court reverse freedom and go back well i guess it kind of depends on your perspective you see for those of us who have held to the definition of marriage from time past and who see it as something that is determined as part of our religious beliefs. We don't see this dictation of what marriage is coming out of Nancy Pelosi and her mob. We don't see that as either constitutional and we don't see it as freeing. We see it as a threat, as a club

to be wielded against us in lawsuits. This is not about freedom. This is about about freedom. This is about wielding a club for persecution. And when we talk about, again, abortion, you're talking about life. You're not talking about a choice. You're not talking about a person's health choices. And it's something they don't have the jurisdiction for anyway.

She said, and listen to what she says. These people, the Supreme Court and the GOP, are reversing the tide of history. In the beginning, our founders had a vision. They had documents that were about the dignity and the worth of people. Ooh, but now she's got to backpedal because she is, after all, a Democrat. You cannot talk about the founding fathers. Of course, she calls them the founders, so she doesn't have to talk about gender issues. So now she says,

they didn't live up to the legislation that we would need later, but it enabled us to do it by amendment. Okay. So she talks about things like abolishing slavery and the rights to vote and so forth. Um, those are fine. We did have an amendment to abolish slavery and these other things. Where is the amendment to give yourself the power to define what marriage is and define where life begins and to tell us that we have to lock down and mask up and jab in and all the rest of this stuff where's the amendment that gives you the power to define all that stuff uh no that was

usurped you don't have the freedom to do that nancy pelosi we have the freedom to decide what we're going to do with health care we do not have the freedom to kill. And if you accept that, that you can kill kids, this is what it looks like. In the EU, parents have been given permission to euthanize children if they've got certain diseases. Planned unparenthood must be very happy about this. Children between the ages of 1 and 12 can now be euthanized in one European nation after officials there extended their voluntary death laws to cover them. The only qualification appears to be to have a terminal illness and be suffering. Well, both of those things are somewhat subjective, aren't they?

In some cases. Sometimes it's pretty clear, but in all cases, it's not. Euthanasia is an option for children who are suffering unbearably with no hope of improvement and for whom palliative care cannot bring relief. Well, of course, we do have, as part of our war on drugs, we have turned a blind eye to palliative care. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment

so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. I had a long letter that was written to me by a listener who said, you know, please don't judge me for having to use opioids. And he talked about how he had had a severe automobile accident. There was some

miraculous things that happened. He should have been dead, but he's in severe pain and he takes it. He says that does not get him high. And that's what I've heard over and over again, in terms of talking about the war on drugs, if somebody is in severe pain from cancer or something like that, that the normally addictive drugs do not do that. They don't get the person high. And so it doesn't become addictive. But what the war on drugs has done is to continually deny those types of treatments to people who do need them and we don't make that kind of distinction it's really this kind of hand-fisted zero or one binary solution and so you know we either legalize it and let everybody you know shoot up heroin on

the streets of san francisco or whatever fentanyl uh or we we take it away from people who really need it. And when I say that, I don't mean to denigrate anybody or put shame on anyone about any of this stuff if they need it. My concern about opioids, and we've had many, many, many cases of opioids. There's a people who were in pain, which could be pretty severe, but not so severe that it would keep them from getting addictive. It's a difficult thing to do. I remember when Rand Paul had several ribs that were broken. And I know that's a very, very painful thing. And it was a compound fracture.

And he was in tremendous amount of pain for a short period of time. But he refused to take opioids because he was afraid he would get addicted. He suffered with the pain because it was going to be a temporary thing. Somebody's got a long-term condition. That's a different story. And, um, and yet,

you know, you look at Chris Christie. I remember when he was running for president in 2016, in order to defend keeping all marijuana illegal including medical marijuana he told a story about a friend of his who was a highly successful lawyer and he had an injury i forget how it happened automobile or something perhaps i don't know but he was put in a lot of pain, and they gave him opioids, and he got addicted to the opioids. And he lost his law practice.

He eventually lost his family, and he committed suicide. And so Chris Christie said, therefore, we need to keep marijuana illegal. It's like, what does that have to do with any of that? That wasn't the drug that he was using. But Chrisie didn't want to come against the pharmaceutical companies who are making so much money and the pharmaceutical companies who are prescribed telling doctors to prescribe this and give it away like candy when it was not warranted and that's what got a lot of people addicted and that's why

i talk about opioids because it's so hein, because it's not something that people get addicted to because they're looking to get high and to drop out of society and have a good time or whatever. They're given it from bad advice from their doctors, perhaps given it for too long or something. And so these are people who were not looking for a thrill. Uh, they were trusting their doctor and they got addicted to it. That's what makes it, uh, so bad in some of these cases. Anyway, let's talk about this euthanasia because this is where it goes. If you don't respect life and euthanasia is different from assisted suicide. Remember we had that discussion? You know, doctor death, Kevorkian.

Euthanasia is different from assisted suicide. It is a medical procedure. And so, you know, you don't, you know, they would always, Kevorkian would say, okay, I'm going to set this thing up and I've got this poison set to go into your veins, but you've got to be the one to flip the thing. No, they just do it to you, which makes it even more dangerous

because then the question is, does the patient really know what is happening with this? So physicians in the Netherlands, by and large, have long backed this idea. And that is where it's going. In Holland. In the Netherlands, a Dutch coalition coming from two Christian parties. They're trying to put up fierce opposition. But in the Netherlands, they're talking about, no, they're going to put euthanasia in as a medical procedure.

And see, this brings me back to looking at when we thumb our noses at God and his moral law, there are consequences frequently for our society. Is it a coincidence that the Netherlands are now the epicenter of the attack by the World Economic Forum on farms to take it down? I know they would go there because it's such fertile farmland that it would make sense for them to shut it down, because they've got a very corrupt minister. Is it perhaps a judgment from God against a secular society that wants to extend euthanasia even to children? Neighboring Belgium approved doctor-assisted death for children of all ages a few years ago. Last year in the Netherlands, you had 8,720 people who died by euthanasia. More than 91,000 have died by the procedure since it was first adopted in 2002.

So we're talking about 21 years. And you can see how it is accelerating. Where 10% of the people who have been killed by euthanasia, killed by doctors deliberately, because doctors are a leading cause of death, but deliberately killed by doctors. That's 10% of the last 21 years happened in the last year. So it is accelerating significantly. Significantly.

Perhaps, as they shut down the farms, maybe they can be the first ones to do Soylent Green, you think? I mean, that was the theme of that movie uh so there's also a group of humanists against assisted suicide and euthanasia and um those humanists who are against it said euthanasia is increasingly seen as a solution for social rather than medical problems. What we are increasingly seeing is death, ironically, as a lifestyle choice for those who are frightened of living. This is worrying to say the least.

Again, these are humanists. As I said before, there are certain moral laws that we all understand instinctively. And they're even speaking out about it. In the UK, former Supreme Court Judge Lord Sumption, he was one who opposed, significantly opposed, a lot of the lockdown measures. He highlighted the serious flaws in pro-assisted suicide rhetoric. He said there's glaring inconsistency at the heart of these pro-assisted suicide causes. He said, what is the justification

for allowing medically assisted suicide, but limiting it to those believed to be close to death or in intolerable pain, actual or even prospective. Oh, yes. You see, you may soon be coming into a situation that is intolerable in pain. So I'll let you kill yourself now. He said, so where is this slippery slope, right?

This is what we would say. He said, there are many other reasons why one might want to end one's life. Once the moral barrier has been crossed, what is the logical stopping point? Well, see, the problem is that we crossed that moral barrier with abortion, didn't we? And we have billionaire Republican donors lecturing people, you better not be extreme in terms of your protection of life. And you better not try to keep pornography out of the schools and the library. Because if you do, I'm not going to give you any money. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business?

At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT Solutions People. Keep your money. We'll be right back. The common man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children.

They created Common Pass to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. All right. I just want to let you know that we're having issues with Rumble again. We had a lot of issues last week as well. If you want to watch us, the live stream on Rumble, you need to go to Roundtable Report to find the live stream. For some reason, it's not working on the David Knight Show ID that's there.

So I don't know if that's an issue with the way that this has been set up. We're trying to figure out what is going on, but it's difficult to get support from it. And look, just understand that, you know, a lot of people have issues with a live stream on Twitter as well. If you're having problems with the issues, please go to the David Knight show.com, the David Knight show.com, because there we have links to where you can watch the live stream. And, um,

you know, we have other links. D live is still there. Rockfin is there. So different places where you can go to pick up the live stream. And we have links to all those places. So if you're having problems with it, and I've had a lot of people contact us,

uh, this week, you know, church had a lot of people saying they'd had problems with it as well've had a lot of people contact us uh this week you know church had a lot of people saying they'd had problems with it as well so uh we have to um you know unfortunately we're not allowed to get on youtube um you know i'm i know that i could fight them but as soon as i got on there would be whatever the prohibited topic of the day is. I would not be allowed to talk about it. And it's my opinion that if there is a prohibited talk, a prohibited subject, that is a subject that you need to be talking about.

And so I'm constantly going to be getting thrown off. Even if I were to get reinstated, it wouldn't last more than a couple of shows. So there's no point in trying to get onto YouTube. Technically, they're great. more than a couple of shows. So there's no point in trying to get onto YouTube. Uh, technically they're great. Uh, but we're going to have to be on these, uh, secondary tertiary platforms.

And so that's just the way that it works. So please go to the David night show.com. That's where you'll find the links to the shows and, um, where you can find them posted afterwards and put up the full show after the show. Most people listen to podcasts. We have a lot of links to different podcasts, but you'll pretty much find us everywhere.

Sometimes, though, it's really hard to find us. I've gone to some of the podcast sites, and if I type in my name, it doesn't show up. But we have links to where those are. So sometimes it's difficult to find it with a search engine. It's kind of interesting. The search engines have become, especially with the case of Google, it has become an engine that is designed to hide things. A good example of it came out this week.

I think it was from the Daily Skeptic. I don't have the actual article here to talk about it, but in one particular topic, they came up with all these different queries that people might make about that particular topic, right? Thought about all the different permutations, and there's a long, long, long list of these, of things that people might put in to manually redirect them to something else. Now, I've said for the longest time, Google is a search engine designed to hide things and people.

And that is a clear example of it. And they don't do it with just one topic. They don't do it with just one person. There's a lot of them out there. So we apologize for that that but it is a struggle and you'll find us pretty much on all the podcasts except for spotify spotify has banned us looking for reliable it solutions for your business at innovate we are the it solutions people for businesses across ireland from network security to cloud productivity we handle it all installing managing supporting and reporting on your entire IT and

telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters growing your business whether it's communications or security innovate has you covered visit innovate today innovate the IT solutions people and so again we have a lot of direct links in case your favorite platform can't find the show. Unless it's Spotify, we're there for now. And we've got links to a lot of the biggest ones there at thedavidknightshow.com. I also want to thank people who have contributed. We had a lot of people who left tips on Friday, but I want to thank the people who contributed with Zelle.

If your bank supports that, that is something that is a really good form for us because there's no fees for that. There are fees on all the other platforms. Some of them we have to change into cryptocurrency and go through a couple of different hops to get there. That just goes up on the cost as well. But in Zelle, there is no fee for the transfer right now, which is kind of interesting. And so let me just say real quickly, thank some of the people who have contributed this month. William and Michael L., Kevin H., Brian P., Adam D., Michael N.,

Gretchen C., Manny D., Tiffany A., Deshawn G., Jared U., Jeffrey C., Robert F., William W., John G., Matthew S., and Gretchen. Again, thank you, Gretchen. Appreciate that. So thank you so much, all of you. And I got the message, Robert F., I got that message on Zelle as well. To give you an update, the gas gauge is correct. We are at, you know, it hasn't budged, but we had moved up.

We were at about 42, 43%. We're now at just over 50%, but not enough to get up to the next mark. So that's where we are at this point in time. We've got about six days left. Let's talk about the medical kidnapping of a newborn. This is something we saw before COVID. It's something that accelerated after COVID. This happened in Texas.

This is an article from Health Impact News. A newborn baby was medically kidnapped in Texas last month because the parents chose to have a home birth with a licensed midwife. And when they took the baby to their pediatrician for a routine checkup, the doctor stated that the child had jaundice and required to be hospitalized. The parents refused to take the baby to the hospital, choosing instead to treat the jaundice themselves under the care of their licensed midwife so the doctor called cps who then came with police to the home and abducted the breastfeeding baby by force the parents finally got to take their baby home earlier today april the 20th but now over a month old, mainly because of attention, national attention to this story. So the family, he says, will now have to deal with this trauma

for the rest of their life, and who knows what medical treatment was given to the baby while it was out of the care of the parents. So it's a black Texas couple who chose their midwife's care over a hospital. Oh, well, you don't want to give your kid to the hospitals that have now proven they don't care about anything other than money. They don't care about the life of their own staff coursing them to take the jab so they could get their bonuses from Biden. So for 20 days, the child was kidnapped by CPS.

It was a judicial proceeding that turned them loose, not CPS. They would not turn the kid back. They sought guidance from their licensed midwife to treat a common infant condition. And they said, we feel like we've gone from being treated like criminals to being treated like unfit parents to feeling like we're being hunted. So the wife, Tamisha Jackson, I think is her last name. Yeah. Decided to work with a midwife and a team of doulas during her pregnancy and home birth because of two difficult C-sections that she had endured while delivering her two sons earlier. Three days after the daughter's birth, the Jacksons visited their longtime pediatrician's office for a routine checkup.

She was diagnosed with jaundice. Now, understand, this is a common condition. It affects about 60% of newborns. Now, understand, this is a common condition. It affects about 60% of newborns. Travis had that, didn't he? Yeah, yeah, Karen is there. And, you know, they put them under a light for a day or so, and it cleared up.

And usually it's nothing serious, and it's very common. Over 60% of kids are diagnosed that way. Pediatrician contacted the couple by phone to talk about treatment options for jaundice. She said, he said the doctor told her that the baby could be treated in the hospital or at home using a list of criteria that he outlined. On the phone with him, she expressed her intention to work with the midwife to begin the at-home treatments. But as the day progressed, the doctor's tone changed. He then contacted the family at least 10 times through phone calls, texts, and voicemails, growing more insistent that they take Myla to the hospital. And within 24 hours, he contacted the department of family

and protective services the petition for the baby's removal also included even the wrong names of the parents that's how knowledgeable and careful he was about all this stuff right and so again it wasn't cps that gave the baby back. Instead, it was the Dallas District Attorney's Office after a lot of publicity about this. But we have seen this kind of medical dictatorship before. We saw it on steroids throughout the lockdown. And I think it's kind of interesting that a book has now come out quoting Michael Gove, one of the big officials in the Conservative Party in the UK, talking about something that Boris Johnson said. Michael Gove is quoted.

This is not, well, an anonymous source says, no, this guy goes on record saying this in the book. He's part of the inner circle of Boris Johnson. He said former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson referred to himself as the Fuhrer and the King as he sharply criticized his former chief advisor

Dominic Cummings. So it's based on an account by Michael Gove. The book says Johnson dramatically fell out with Cummings soon after the 2019 UK election, in which the Tories gained an 80-seat majority in Parliament. And what did they do with that big majority? They locked people down, just like Donald Trump.

According to Michael Gove, Boris Johnson felt as though he was being controlled, quote, as a tempestuous thoroughbred with a strong whip and a bridle to keep him in order. He sees himself as a tempestuous thoroughbred. No, I think he's a brain jackass. It's more like it. So, yeah, he's got a strong whip and a bridle to keep him in order maybe he's referring to some of his extracurricular activities as cummings attempted to stage manage which issues would or would not get the prime minister's attention

and so michael gove said some days the prime minister could laugh it off, but other days he didn't. This led, says Michael Gove in the book, to an outburst from Johnson as he attempted to take back control of Downing Street. I'm meant to be in control. I am the fuhrer. I am the king who takes the decisions. You see? Egomaniac and um interestingly enough dominic cummings was another one of these officials are forced out of office like matt

hancock after they'd been shown to be locked down hypocrites play actors who didn't believe in any of this stuff they the orders were for thee, not for me. And so as people found out they were living under these outrageous dictates of austerity, and they see these people partying and doing whatever they want, Boris Johnson included, and then we have the text files that we got from Matt Hancock, where he's texting other people, laughing about what they're doing to people, literally laughing about it. And so Dominic Cummings was one of those people who caught in that stuff, and he was dismissed for that. The book also alleges that Johnson would cite his then fiance, now his wife,

allegedly describing her as, quote, mad and crazy. Well, I think we know who is mad and crazy. Cummings, again, was a chief architect of Brexit, but he flagrantly violated lockdown rules, like Boris Johnson himself, like matt hancock himself uh so you know again was it a dictatorship yes we had as i love the way eric peters ep autos.com i love the way eric peters described these people i called him Gesundheit Führers. Yeah, authoritarian Führers, dictators. Gesundheit Führers. And so that's what he was, essentially.

I called it medical martial law from day one. And two weeks in, after the curve, flattening the curve thing had been shown to be false, I was attacked by Daily Beast as an extremist. We're calling it medical martial law. It was medical martial law. It will be medical martial law if we don't stop these organizations, these international organizations with their new rules and new treaties and all the rest of this stuff. And if we don't get rid of the people who did this to us, if we reelect the guy who was president and did it to us this is the thing that i can't understand it just infuriates me to see these idiots who

support trump they don't they hate the lockdown they hate the jab they hate everything that was done but they can't connect it to trump what's the matter with them again he paid for all of it he's responsible for all of it because he was a president and he paid for all of it. He's responsible for all of it because he is a president, and he paid for all of it. He incentivized it. He bribed the governors to do it, and he continued to bribe them to do it, and he continued to cheer himself. Well, after the time he had left office about what he had done,

he bragged about it. So an unvaccinated, terminally ill Alberta women, woman is being denied a transplant. And again, whatever you think about the morality of transplants or about the efficacy of transplants, forget about that for a second. And think about the fact that these hospitals believe that this is going to at least they say they do. And and so whether or not they believe it themselves or they're just lying to people. These are presented as life saving necessary treatments, and they're willing to publicly say we're not give life-saving treatments to somebody if you're not vaccinated. That's the key thing to take away from this.

Don't get hung up on the transplant issue with this. This is about, whether it's ethical or moral or anything else, whether it works. This is about them withholding life-saving treatment from people because they haven't bought Big Pharma's product. End of story. And so this is happening in Alberta. We have the new premier, Daniel Smith, who people said, well, you know, we need to get a different conservative in. We need to get somebody who's going to try to conserve life and liberty.

And she's said some good things. Where is she right now? Is she going to do anything about this? So even after obtaining an independent medical report showing that she has natural immunity, how do they do that? Well, the same way that, you know, the way they have defined the efficacy of these vaccines. They redefined it, right? The way a vaccine had been defined prior to that was to prevent you from getting whatever you were vaccinated for. So that was a definition of whether or not it worked. They changed that because they knew that it wasn't going to work. They changed it to say, well, if we can see some antibodies, some antigens or whatever,

then we'll say that it's working. Well, they can see those things in her. And again, when you go back to all of the lies that were told to us about natural immunity, this is the key thing. Their vaccine theory is completely dependent on a functioning immune system. The purpose of the vaccine is to train your immune system with something that is dead or weakened. And that's not what these vaccines were, right? They were going to turn your body

into a manufacturing facility for a pathogen, the spike. And the spike then was supposed to trigger your immune system. But even under that definition, the spike was supposed to trigger your immune system to attack this thing because your immune system does not forget. That's why natural immunity lasts. And so all of this, there's no science involved in any of this. This is politics. It is corruption. So she had natural immunity to COVID-19.

She had overcome previous infections and had antigens there, they said. Because the science is natural immunity. Without natural immunity, there is no basis for any of their vaccine theory. And yet they denied that for the last two years. And so she provided a report, a lab report, had her doctors do this. They tested the blood for the antibodies and so forth, produced this report. And then the physician told her that the report concluded that even with natural immunity, she would need a booster dose of the COVID vaccine.

The report doesn't say anything about a booster dose. He's just flat out lying. He's just making this stuff up because all of it has just been made up. Now, Jason Barker says, I bet they gave the baby the vaccines. I'm sure they did. I'm sure they did. Maybe even the COVID-19, but you better believe that they gave the baby all of the vaccines at the beginning.

They didn't say that in that article. That might have been one of the reasons why the lady wanted to have the baby at home. That's why that's an important story because so many people are trying to stay away from these pharmaceutical institutions that we call hospitals. So getting back to this, when we look at what the bottom line is in terms of childhood vaccines, and we're just talking about euthanasia in Belgium and now soon to be in Netherlands, if the parents say it's okay, they can kill the kids. How long is it going to be before they just get rid of the parents as part of that equation and just talk to the kids and say, you can decide whether or not you want to die. You know that's coming, right? They're saying

here in America that kids can, very, very young kids, can take chemicals, can have surgery to mutilate and sterilize them. They can do it without their parents' knowledge. Tennessee has now said no to vaccinating children without parental consent. If you remember back in the COVID-19 campaign, the Tennessee Department of Health, one individual there in particular, came up with the idea of the, quote, mature minor doctrine to allow minors who are 14 years old and older to be vaccinated without the parent's consent.

These strangers would decide if the child was mature enough to make that decision at 14. So they would subjectively, these people who don't know the child, haven't cared for the child, they have no knowledge of this child's maturity whatsoever. Based on what they want to do, they would say the child has the maturity to make this decision, and we don't really care what the parents want. It's always about parental rights, isn't it? The Mature Minor Doctrine Clarification Act was passed in the Tennessee Senate last week

and passed in the House on Thursday. It's awaiting the signature of the governor here. And what they did was to, they said, we're going to clarify this and make it clear to you that you cannot do this with the vaccines. Rolf Hazelhurst, a senior staff attorney for Children's Health Defense, that's RFK Junior's organization, said the Department of Health's vaccination policy was based on a, quote,

dangerous oversimplification of the mature minor doctrine. And he said, this is going to have national implications because it did the other way as well. And a February 21st hearing of the Tennessee house help subcommittee. He testified that the law's importance goes beyond Tennessee because nationwide people are still relying on Tennessee's misinterpretation of the mature minor doctrine to vaccinate children without parental consent.

He was a senior attorney in a lawsuit brought by Children's Health Defense against the District of Columbia seeking an injunction to block enforcement of a law passed in 2020 allowing children 11 and older to consent to vaccination. So is NDC as well. The Mature Minor Doctrine is based on a 1987 Tennessee Supreme Court case where the court ruled in favor of a doctor accused of medical malpractice for treating a 17-year-old girl for a herniated disc. In that case, the court came up with an interesting thing

they called the rule of sevens. And so what they did, you know, just like the Supreme Court did on Roe v. Wade, they come up with some arbitrary cutoff dates. So they said, children under the age of seven, they cannot consent to treatment whatsoever. For children between the ages of 7 and 14, a physician generally should get parental consent before treating, but it's not necessary.

But then they said from the age of 14 up, the physician may treat without parental consent unless the physician believes the minor is not sufficiently mature to make his or her own health care decisions. So the default is that you are mature enough at the age of 14 and you don't need your parents. It's kind of interesting. There was a series of films that were made about a bunch of kids from all different economic levels. Some of them came from wealthy families. Some of them were living in public housing and stuff like that. It was called Seven Up.

First one was done in 1964. And filmmaker Michael Apted, he's had a lot of successful Hollywood-type films. He did Coal Miner's Daughter. He, he did coal miners daughter. He directed that, uh, gorillas in the mist. He did one of the bond films and other things like that. But as a, as a young director, uh, because now he is, um, 79. And, uh, so he's just a few years. Um, you know, he was still pretty young when he started doing this.

Cause he's the last one of these that he did was in 2019. What he did was he talked to a bunch of kids. Again, their parents are all different. Some of them in government school, some of them in very expensive private academies and everything. And talked to them about a wide variety of subjects. And then he followed up seven years later. So he does it at seven years old. He does it at 14.

He called it 14 up and then 21 up and so forth. And you could see these different, you can see these kids aging and catching everybody up on what had happened within that seven year period. And he's done that all the way up to these, this group of people were 63 years old in 2019. That's the most recent one he's done. It's pretty amazing to see it.

It truly is. And, um, um, I would highly recommend it. It's very, very interesting series, but I thought it was kind of interesting when I saw this arbitrary thing of

seven years, you know, zero to seven is this seven to 14 is this and 14 and up. Is it, um, it's, um, but it was an arbitrary thing of seven years, you know, zero to seven is this, seven to 14 is this, and 14 and up is that. But it was an arbitrary thing. Here's the thing that is not arbitrary, the family. All of these things about parental rights is ultimately an attack on the family. Children do not have the maturity to make these decisions. Children at 14 cannot consent to gender mutilation or to vaccination or to having sex. That should be statutory rape. Even if the kid supposedly consents,

but of course you have people like Alan Dershowitz has pushed for somewhere around that age. He was 14, 15, something like that. And a lot of people have been pushing for that. And that's really what all this gender stuff at one level is about, is to push a pedophile agenda, saying that kids can consent to that. But they can't. The kids do not have the maturity. When you look at this, how old was the guy that did those leaks in the game room,

you know, the Pentagon paper leaks that just came out? He's like 21 years old or something. Yeah, but he's very young, and he was probably under 21 when he started doing it. But his lack of judgment, you look at this and you say, why in the world is this kid thinking? His lack of judgment is something we see over and over again with younger people. Physiologically, the brain is still developing to the age of 26,

and you have just kids, young people will make really strange judgments on things that affect them and other people. And that's one of the reasons why, especially young kids, we say the parents are going to make that decision for them. They're not going to be allowed to make that decision. We're not going to treat them as adults. If you treat them as adults, what you're trying to do is to rip them away from the family. You can clearly see that with these vaccination rules and with the gender rules. They're trying to rip the kids away from the family. And that is all an attack on the family.

Let me just play for you a short, one of the commercials that I did about 11, 12, 13 years ago, opposing the children's rights, the UN's Convention on Children's Rights, which is a fiction. Children don't have rights because they don't have judgment. They don't have the ability to make responsible decisions. So that's why you have parents taking care of them. And that's the way God designed it.

God designed the family to take care of the children. No government, no matter how well-intentioned, can replace the nurturing love of a parent. Yet in the United States, judicial activism and a pending UN treaty are poised to tear apart this most fundamental bond of society. These foreign and domestic threats would undermine the parental role and overrule parental wishes. All parents would have the legal status of an abusive parent, with the state and not the parents deciding what is in the best interest of the child.

The relentless encroachment of judges and UN treaties that assume that government, not parents, has the best interests of the child at heart, will be stopped by nothing short of a constitutional amendment explicitly stating the rights of parents. Decisions affecting the child should be made by those who know and love that child, not by a distant bureaucracy. You can help protect children by helping those who care the most for them and those who care the best for them, the family. Find out what you can do at parentalrights.org.

And I don't even know if they are still around. I would have thought this would be the perfect opportunity for them to take the forefront on all this, with everything that we see happening in the schools, the vaccines, and all the rest of this. Virtual Gypsy comments and says, Sad mini breastfed babies get jaundice at first. It's treated with UV light. That's it. A midwife can treat that. Anybody can treat that. That's exactly right. Just put treated with UV light. That's it. A midwife can treat that.

Anybody can treat that. That's exactly right. Just put them under the light. They're fine. Thank you, Ben. I appreciate the tip. Thank you very much. But again, getting back to Tennessee, when you had this, the doctor was Dr. Michelle Ficus, medical director of Tennessee's Vaccine Preventable Diseases and Immunization Program. It was the summer of 2021. And when she came out and said, we're going to do the mature minors and we're going to vaccinate kids at 14 years old without their parents' consent, unless something can be shown to prove that they are not mature. We're going to the default position again was going to be that 14 year olds can make that decision.

And so she was fired and that really got the, uh, really got the uh, national press upset about that. Um, they said, um, uh, they also brought in her supervisor and a question. The supervisor said questioned the supervisor, said at the time only 37 to 39% of Tennessee residents were vaccinated. Senator Mark Potey said, I don't know the terms that I could use to express my extreme disappointment that in the state of Tennessee where the majority of adults said no, to think that a 14-year-old child could say yes.

Yeah. Well, who is pushing them? We know that this is a psychological move. By the way, confidence in childhood vaccination has now plummeted by up to 44% because of this warp speed fraud. And it is the same scam that they've used year after year with the flu shot. That's why it was so obviously apparent to me and anybody in alternative media, even though a lot of people in alternative media were selling the panic about Wuhan so they could sell storable

food and other things. They helped to push that panic as much as Fauci did, and it was reprehensible. I made record profits, but confidence in childhood vaccines has fallen up to 44% in 52 different countries. You know, it's one of the things Rand Paul, when he talked to Fauci, I remember one of the times he said, you know, you're going to, you're going to increase vaccine hesitancy. It's a good, I thought that's a good thing, but he was, you know, I was happy about that, but Rand Paul was very concerned. He wants all those kids to get vaccinated.

Well, how about if we look to see if it's safe or not? Catherine Russell, Executive Director of UNICEF, the UN's organization, Stick It's Nose and the Children and Families Business, said that the data is a warning warning signal. Scientists rapidly developed vaccines that saved countless lives, she said. But despite this historic achievement, no, these people are still selling you the snake

oil completely detached from reality. And the longer they do this, the more skeptical people are going to be of all this, which is a really good thing. This article from Zero Hedge points out RFK Jr. So that not a single vaccine on the childhood vaccine schedule has been safely tested prior to being approved. rfk said none of the 72 doses of vaccines that are currently mandated for children has ever been tested in a pre-licensing safety study against a true placebo it's a big problem he said because many of the injuries come from vaccines like all medicines those injuries are long-term injuries see this is why it doesn't bother me. A lot of people are very bothered by the fact that RFK Jr. would say,

look, I'm not anti-vaccine. I'm pro-science. I want to have these things tested for safety and efficacy. I don't see a problem with that. As I said before, this is simply the way that you explain the problem to people. Because if you were to test these things for safety and efficacy, it'd be the same thing as saying, I don't want to have the vaccines. And people say, well, you're anti-science. No, let's rigorously enforce the science.

When I look at the way that RFK Jr. talks about this, what he's essentially saying is what Ulysses Grant said. He said, the way you get rid of a bad law is to rigorously enforce it. Well, the way you get rid of bad science is to rigorously test it. Vaccines are bad science. So let's rigorously test them to see if they're safe or effective. But he said, you know, the problem is these things are long-term injuries. He said, you may say that the vaccine prevented the infection,

but then you don't count the cancers, the neurological disorders, the ADHD, the autoimmune diseases that pop up five years from now. So he said, you need to have long-term studies. Just the opposite of what Trump did. You know, Fauci, how do we get rid of this thing? We've got to go five, ten years. Well, you know, we do it from the inside with Trump. We do it with chaos, disruption, and we do it iteratively.

Kennedy said that the DTP, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine, the most popular vaccine in the world because of the efforts of those behind the vaccines, the people selling the vaccines. He said, incidentally, the U.S. withdrew the vaccine because it was killing so many children. It was causing brain damage, according to a study that was done by UCLA, said RFK. You should just call him RFKJ for junior. Shorthand. Instead of saying junior all the time, just call him RFKJ. We ended it in the United States.

We replaced it with a DTaP vaccine. D-T-A-P, he said. It's an attenuated version. He said it is safer, but it is less effective. And he said they did the same thing in Europe. Eventually, the Danish government did an extensive study of DTP with 30 years of vaccination records and with leading pro-vaccination scientists, including Peter Abbey, they found that the vaccine was causing anemia, dysentery, pneumonia, and killing more people than diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis dead prior to the introduction of the vaccine. See? That's the issue.

We see this so often. I was just talking to a friend at church who said he was given an antibiotic. Okay, fine. And it had all kinds of things happen to him. And I said, yeah, my mom had a major stroke from an antibiotic that she was given after a minor surgery. And he said, I started looking through the side effects of this

thing, you know, and it gave him some really horrific side effects. And it is truly interesting, but it is this thing that we see from pharmaceutical industry all the time. You know, here's this drug and, you know, it's got maybe a 20, 30% chance it's going to help you with this. But of course, it also has a chance that it might actually give you or worsen the condition that you're taking it for. And then it's got this whole long list of other things. And we see that all the time.

And these ask your doctor commercials. It's truly amazing to me that those things have been so effective. That was something, as I said, many times we moved, um, uh, in the early nineties, uh, and before these ask your doctor things came out, we moved to an area where we couldn't get any broadcast TV and there was no satellite and there was no cable and everything. So we didn't have television at all. And, um, when we would travel, take a vacation, we'd check in the hotels and flip on the TV and it's just one of these things after the other. It's like, what is going on with this?

This is odd. Never seen this before. And they seem to be, you know, um, like two thirds of the commercial. So these ask your doctor things. And when you look at the, ask your doctor stuff, what do you get? You get somebody rambling off all these different symptoms really, really rapidly while they got people, kids running through the fields in slow motion. And yet, even though they're telling you all these things that it does, including making, you know, creating or exacerbating the condition that you were taking

it for, in spite of all that, it helped. The, it's one of the reasons that they were taking it for. In spite of all that, it helped. One of the reasons that they're using it is because it works. People look at that and they ask their doctor and push their doctor, just as pharmaceutical people are pushing their doctor to prescribe these things. And it works. They just completely ignore all of these side effects. Oh, it ain't going to happen to me. I'll be fine. Really? So anyway, they found

that the DTP was causing anemia, dysentery, pneumonia, killing more people than these things that you were vaccinating them for. He said, that's the danger, said RFKJ. You could have a vaccine for 30 or 40 years and nobody actually notices that the kids who are taking it are worse off from a health perspective because you've never done this in placebo-controlled trials and you've never done it long enough. As a matter of fact, prior to warp speed, that was one of the things that I had covered. The fact that these people who, many medical professionals in these global vaccine committee meetings, we had recordings of them. I remember Adele Bigtree had recordings of it that he put out. I think it came from him originally.

But they were captured saying, you know, we're not doing these tests long enough. And so what was the response to that? Well, let's just stop it altogether, said Fauci and Trump. Right? They're saying, you know, we're only doing these things for five or 10 years. That's not long enough for us to see the long-term effects. Oh, no, let's make it to where five weeks and a couple of animal tests and we're done.

That was their response. The VAERS database that they said, well, okay, we're going to take away the liability of the vaccine companies, but we'll have a database here so we can track it. We can make improvements and all the rest of the stuff. After 30 years, Dell Big Tree, and I think RFK was involved in that as well, RFKJ. And they sued him and said, we'd like to see what your recommendations are. No, we're not going to give it to you.

So they sue him, you know, under Freedom of Information Act. Finally, they have to comply. And they say, well, we haven't done anything with that data that we've collected for three decades. Nothing at all. We don't care. We don't care about the adverse effects. So in Germany, we're seeing the tide really turn. Vaccine injuries are becoming a dominant theme in the media.

And this is an article by Eugipius. He said, last month, the German health minister and renowned virus pest, this is what he puts this guy, Lauterbach, gave a remarkable interview in which he denounced, quote, exorbitant pharmaceutical profits. He deplored, quote, dismaying, unquote, vaccine injuries. And he called for the manufacturers to set aside funds for those who'd been harmed. He did so amid a growing wave of reporting on vaccine injuries on the German press, a wave which his statements have now turned into a tsunami.

In the weeks since he said that, vaccine injuries and side effects have become the dominant theme in German press coverage on the jabs, from local papers to national media. It's been a serious shift. He said the likes of which I'm not sure has unfolded in any other country to give you a taste of it. He said, here's some headlines, uh,

that you can see from the last eight weeks or so. Uh, he says, remember, these are all links to publications that are read by ordinary people. These are not medical journals. So, you know,

one of them is the tabloid, the build, and then they go to the big establishment, Der Spiegel and all the rest of the stuff. So, you know, one of them is the tabloid, the build, and then they go to the big establishment, Der Spiegel, and all the rest of the stuff. Here's some of the headlines. He lost his sight. Dietmar S. sues BioNTech for 150,000 euros. Another one from Der Spiegel. The problems are hushed up. A Marburg cardiologist treats people who suffer from long-term symptoms after COVID vaccinations. Another one. My life is no longer like before. Sick after COVID.

Another one. Lupus after COVID vaccination. A young woman from Hess is treated in a special cologne clinic. COVID vaccine injury is another story. Do manufacturers face liability? Another one. Soon the first lawsuits will start across Germany. There are almost 200 civil lawsuits against Corona vaccine manufacturers

like bio in tech. Another one injection with an aftermath. A man suffers stroke after COVID vaccination. Another one vaccine injury, exclamation mark. First case before the court. See, these are in reverse chronological order. He points out across Germany, 185 civil lawsuits are pending because of damages caused by corona vaccinations. Here in the United States, we have the George W. Bush PrEP that made it, uh, you know, impossible for people to sue.

You have to go through their special masters program, just like the childhood vaccine thing. 11, over 11,000 cases. Only three people have been compensated total of about 4,000. One person was given 2000. Another person has given 1,000, uh, and only three people compensated. Two of them had heart damage out of over 11,000. It's absolutely criminal, totally criminal.

What is happening? So he says, um, this is a trend that has been driven in Germany from the bottom up by popular interest. He says, this isn't a, and even though, you know, some of these stories that are out there, he said, um, they still will put them out there. And then he said,

what he's concerned about is that they're all kind of first person. They're about one person who's been injured. And he said, this isn't the way that I would have chosen for this to go because the focus on isolated stories allows the very same press outlets to recycle propaganda from the World Health Organization that the vaccines have saved a million European lives and to repeat uncritically the claims of foolish regulators that, quote, vaccination was the decisive factor in ending the pandemic.

They can also dismiss these individual stories as rare and not typical and that's the way that this always goes and how you have to balance this but it is important to have these individual stories because as stalin said you know one death is a tragedy a million deaths is a statistic and so you have to have both of these things. And what he's saying is the one bad thing that he sees in these German stories is that they're not giving the bigger picture. They're not giving the statistical picture. You got to get people's,

you got to get people to make that connection with the individual and to empathize with them. And then to show that this is part of, this is not an isolated incident. HPV vaccine mandate here in the United States to attend college. And this is in California. A proposed bill would require public college students

under 26 to get the HPV vaccine in order to attend college. I remember when Rick Perry was the first one to try to ram that through in Texas. He had a staffer who had worked for him and then went to work for a pharmaceutical company. Then lo and behold, Rick Perry is pushing HPV as a requirement to young girls. It wasn't even for both sexes. It was just for girls. And that got shut down.

And now where are we? We have mandates on everything, and now in California you're going to have to have it in order to go to college, and this is for men as well as women. Everybody. You're not going to be able to choose in this. Let's switch over to face masks because there's been several stories that have come out about

face masks. A new study has said that they may raise the risk of stillbirths, of testicular dysfunction, and of cognitive decline. Who knew? If you deprive people of oxygen, you mean you might give them cognitive decline, especially doing that to pregnant women and you're going to lower the IQ of the kids. Yeah, that's what they found. Isn't that interesting? Another thing, straight out of Brave New World. Yeah, let's tell these rubes out there while they're laughing and they're, you know,

having their parties like Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock and truth be known people like Fauci and the rest of them probably in the United States as they're laughing about that. Let's let these people, uh, we'll tell them they got to wear masks. We'll inject pregnant women. We'll mask pregnant women straight out of brave new world where they would take the different, you know, they created a caste system. Alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon,

five different castes of people, classes of people. And their artificial hatcheries, they would deprive the epsilons of oxygen. They would enrich it for some of the others to make them smarter while they make other people dumb. Yeah. Like eugenics, this caste system. Was it news to anybody that this would have adverse effects?

I talked about it. You know, the face acne that you would see on people who would be required by their boss to wear masks all day. And you could see that acne there all the time. Why is that there? And I pointed out i said look your body uh eliminates waste in three different ways and the mouth is one of them and so that's like wearing that's why we called it a dirty face diaper because that was what was happening but we also had studies we had the study out of australia in 2002 when they

first had uh sars happening and hong kong and things like that they panicked everybody then and you had a lot of people in asia wearing masks and in australia uh they said um in one of the provinces there they said uh if you tell people that mask and they were talking about n95 masks they weren't talking about cloth masks. If you tell people that these N95 masks are going to protect them against SARS, we will fine you $100,000 Australian dollars because that's fraud. Then within 20 years, you had in New South Wales, Gladys Berejiklian demanding that. No new science. And the reason they said that was in that particular study, they were showing that it

wasn't protective of other people. They focused on the exhaling part of it. You know, even if you could, um, you didn't have to worry about it getting around the sides and so forth or going through there. Uh, people say, oh, well, yeah, but it's on the spittle particles. That's what we're catching with a mask. Well, you're certainly not going to catch anything that's airborne. It's going to be too small, even for the N95 masks.

But she pointed out in her study that after 20 minutes, it becomes so saturated with spittle that it still goes out, but it goes out as smaller particles that travel farther and remain airborne longer. Then we had, during the middle of all of all this was in 2021 or 2022, you had a German scientist who did a study and he said, one of the reasons everybody is getting sick with this stuff is because the same thing, it makes these particles smaller and you're respirating them into your lungs. And so they're going further into your lungs,

deeper down and it's exacerbating things there. Now this is a study is a study of studies. And so in this particular one, what they did was a German research team gathered data from 43 previously published studies on exposure to CO2, on mask wearing, and on pregnancy. And what they came up with, they said the buildup of CO2 in pregnant women's bodies could cause complications for an unborn fetus. They point out that CO2 also contributes to oxidative stress, which can affect cognition and cause testicular issues in men.

They said one mass study that was conducted in Germany that they looked at, researchers measured CO2 concentration of air behind the surgical masks worn by 15 healthy men. Within 30 minutes, the CO2 concentration rose to roughly 2.8 to 3.2%. They said that wearing a mask for more than five minutes they could see it going between 1.4 percent and 3.2 percent another study in italy scientists measured the air under surgical masks worn in a lab and they found a concentration of between 0.22 and 0.29% within five minutes. The bottom line is it comes in pretty quickly,

and it can get very large the longer you wear it. You're breathing CO2. Isn't it interesting that they freak out about CO2 as a magic greenhouse gas, and yet they don't have any problem about it when it is trapped under your mask, where it really can create problems because of the high concentration of it. So we don't have that much concentration of CO2, even with all of the whining about man-made global warming. So who are these diehard pro-maskers who are refusing to admit defeat?

This is coming from the Daily Skeptic. They said, well, you know, we get all these studies talking about how they don't work and how now studies showing that they actually harm your health. Despite the recently published Cochrane Review reaching the same conclusion as previous evidence evaluations that face coverings do not achieve any reduction in viral transmissions, pro-mask rhetoric is persisting in the mainstream media. So what is the engine for these spreaders of misinformation? Is it those who seem to be committed to world government who are responsible? And so the author goes through and looks at several of these pieces and has a long appendix at the end of this article talking about all these people writing these articles in mainstream media and who they work for and it's like oh yeah what a surprise they all work for these globalist ngo organizations

so for instance one of them they have an interview with a prominent behavioral scientist. See, this is the only science involved in any of this stuff. Where he talks about his strategic decisions to show then-serving Prime Minister Boris Johnson a series of images of other world leaders wearing masks, thereby deploying normative pressure to nudge Johnson to do otherwise. That nudge, that's behavioral psychology. So we're going to show him a lot of pictures. See, everybody else is doing it, Prime Minister.

This tempestuous thoroughbred. Yeah, they tied him up and whipped him into submission is what they did. It was bridled, braying jackass boris johnson the same thing of the braying jackass donald trump you know everybody's doing it donald you know it's like really smart people are doing it so you should do it too they'll think you're smart as well uh so they said there's no recognition of course that the wearing of face masks covering by healthy people. Works, highly contentious, strong evidence to suggest the practice is both ineffectual and associated with a range of physical, social, and psychological harms. I've talked a couple of times to a child psychologist who talks about the horrific psychological effects.

This is Adam Kitt. who talks about the horrific psychological effects this has had on kids. So the physiological effects of this increased CO2 on children, then the psychological effects of not being able to see people's mouths and their full face and how long-lasting that is. But, you know, who cares? Because this is put together by the same people behind the green agenda, and they just hate humanity, and they want to shut us all down. So you got Ron Johnson, Senator Ron Johnson, who has been at the forefront of trying to help people who have been damaged by this. And you know what the sad thing about it is?

He is the only one. Where is Rand Paul? Where is doctor, medical doctor Rand Paul in all this stuff? AWOL. You know, he's there haranguing Fauci about gain of function, which, again, we should have talked about that back in 2014. Right now, you need to stop this, and you need to do something to help the people that have been harmed by it. But if you do something to help the people who have been harmed by it,

then you acknowledge the fact that it is harming people. And pharmaceutical companies don't want that. So if you are afraid to acknowledge, Rand, that this is hurting people and to do something about it like Senator Johnson is doing, Ron Johnson, are you doing this for the pharmaceutical companies? Is that why you're doing this? Why are you keeping this under wraps? So he's asked for details on this compensation

scheme that i was talking about you know went from horrible to even worse went from the childhood immunity you know vaccine immunity thing to the prep act in 2005 done by george w bush he says it's a scandal that people are not getting compensated for this. He also asked whether the government has advertised even to let people know that there is any compensation program. As little as they are paying, most people don't even know. That's why there's probably only been 11,000 people who have applied. It's not that 11,000 people have been harmed. That 11,000 people who have applied. It's not 11,000 people have been harmed.

The 11,000 people know about it. The Republican. See, that's interesting. The Republican. The only Republican. Think about that. Ron Johnson. The only Republican that is concerned about people who have been injured by the vaccines.

He outlined the requested information in a letter to Javier Becerra, who runs HHS, the lawyer who runs HHS for Biden. So only one. And from all the rest of them, you get nothing but crickets. We're going to go to break before we do. I want to read some of the comments here. Thank you, AudiMRR. Thank you very much for that tip. I appreciate

that. He is Audi Modern Retro Radio. He says, thanks again for your consistent reporting. Well, thank you. Appreciate that. An honest commentary. Jason Barker, my neighbors listened to the show Saturday and came over to ask me who RFK was. People are not interested in what's going on or else everyone would be tracking the vaccine injuries. That's right. Now, he's done great work in terms of the vaccine stuff. He's going to be able to bring a lot of clarity as well as illumination to this thing.

I mean, he isn't just going to go out there and, you know, throw this thing out. And I think his approach, rather than being out. And I think, uh, his, his approach, rather than being a betrayal, I think the approach of saying, look, we got to do science on this. You know, that's what he did when, when Trump came him in, uh, brought him in, uh, he went there and, um, the press said, why'd you come? He says, well, I came because Trump wanted me to come in. Are you, uh, is he going to do something to shut down vaccines? No, he's not anti-vaccine.

I'm not anti-vaccine. We just want to do the science and make sure that it's safe and effective. Well, a lot of people saw that as a betrayal. I think that is a smart way to position it. Frankly, uh, my concerns with RFK Jr. I have to do with things like, you know, the LGBT issue, the moral issues, LGBT, uh, abortion, other things like that. And of course, questions about him, the moral issues, LGBT, uh, abortion, other things like that. And of course, questions about him, his moral issues personally.

I, I think that it matters for things like that. But again, I think the key thing is that we've got to do this at a local level. Uh, Aaron Moss, he says, um, the first thing foreigners say about us is the ask your doctor commercials. I bet. I mean, it's just crazy it's just crazy uh people can't see that that is something that's being done by the pharmaceutical companies uh kwd 68 is that on uh rumble okay uh i remember when there were no peanut allergies. Yeah. I remember when there was no autism.

It was, it was rare as a fact, you would say very, very rare. Uh, John Henry, three years old. Uh,

sorry, three years. It's not three years old, three years. And I am still stunned by how dumb the general public is that they believe any of this stuff. Yes. So that's why OSHA originally said you could wear a mask for no longer than 20 minutes. by how dumb the general public is that they believe any of this stuff. Yes.

So that's why OSHA originally said you could wear a mask for no longer than 20 minutes. Then they erased that webpage. Yes, I talked about that many, many times. How political, you know, how political that is. You'd have situations where they would require that you wear an N95 mask because it was very dusty. But then they would say, but, but you know you got to give people time to get out of there um you know and recover because the concentration of co2 all that stuff but they just wiped it away because it was nothing but politics no concern about health and no science

at all um so uh again audi mrr uh rand Rand Paul's wife owns stock in the Vax parent companies. He's nothing like his dad. That's right. When all this stuff was happening, you know, and he's coming after Fauci. And of course, Fauci gave that gift to Gilead pharmaceutical of remdesivir, something that was about to lose its patent. And they tried to push it for AIDS. They tried to push it for Ebola.

Everybody said, this is a dangerous drug. It's damaging the liver, and it's not doing anything. And he said, well, he got it. He declared unilaterally, without any tests, and without any justification, because it was a therapeutic. It wasn't a vaccination. It was supposed to get you over it. And he said, well, it doesn't cure it,

but I think the people who get better get better 30% faster. Non-peer-reviewed study, and using his bold-faced authority, he just declared it as a standard of care, right? And Rand Paul's wife was buying Gilead stock at the time. One of the reasons why he just kept quiet, isn't it? Always the same stuff. Get the spouse to buy the stocks, just like Nancy Pelosi got Paul Pelosi to buy the stocks. Same, same game.

We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. And let's talk a little bit about climate. The climate MacGuffin. This is at the center of so many things. And I don't think we can just dismiss it as just one issue. It is a foundational issue.

I've talked for the longest time about the climate MacGuffin. And the, by the way, before we get into it, I'll read this on the topic we were talking about just before, KWD 68. I had to take my daughter to the emergency room in 2020. As we walked in, I was ordered to wear a mask. I told them that if they wanted to be paid, they'd let me in. But either way, they would not treat her. Yeah, I've seen the same thing as well.

Same thing as well. Same thing as well. Uh, Christine, uh, one, two, three, five.

And these are a couple of people that have gotten through on rumble. We've been having problems with rumble. Again, if you want to watch this show on rumble, you have to go to round table report. Uh, but you'll find the links at the David night show.com. Uh,

Christine said I had to teach wearing that crap. Oh, sorry. Always wore it under my nose and protest that drives me absolutely nuts that i got so angry every morning i had to just put that on i quit well good for you i remember getting thrown out of a not let not thrown out but i couldn't get into a bank one day. And the guy who was the elderly security guard, uh, you know, comes over,

you can't come in without that mask. And he's got it under his nose. I said, the mask is under your nose. You don't believe it either. And he goes, he looks around, he pulls the thing up over his nose.

It was like, uh, you're already caught on video. I'm sure they got video cameras there everywhere. Uh, made me so angry. We got our money out of that bank. Um, anyway, uh, she said, I even tried writing a letter to our governor Abbott.

Oh yeah. Before the school year and nothing. Oh, of course not. Not Abbott. No, that guy was bought and paid for. So let's talk about the climate MacGuffin because it was a justification for locking us down and taking everything away from us for the longest time. And that's where they're headed with this stuff. It will be used to lock us down and taking everything away from us for the longest time. And that's where they're headed with this stuff. It will be used to lock us down.

And, um, over the weekend for earth day, we had this crazy op-ed piece. It was done by time. The case for making earth day, a religious holiday. And it was up all weekend. It might even still be up this morning on the drug report. Uh, this, uh, op-ed piece, crazy. This is what the guy said. Earth Day is upon us.

That forlorn little non-holiday that some years sandwiches itself between Easter and Passover. He goes there right away. And again, I've played clips for you of the very first earth day it was always about population control and it was always about the hippies and you know i've been a conservative all my life so i you know the the long-haired hippies were were protesting on earth day and i'm like no way uh but anyway i knew that it was like i said I had a good friend of mine who was also, you know, we pretty much saw eye to eye on everything except for that, except for population. And he's like, Oh, we got it. We've got too many people on the planet.

We got to, you know, reduce it somehow, even by force if necessary. It's like, how in the world could you go there? You know? So, uh, once he'd start getting on his horse, I would just redirect him to something else. Like, look, squirrel, you know, so we can stay friends. But anyway, earth day is the collective yawn says this author that,

uh, Paul Greenberg and Carl Safina. It is the collective yawn that brings a shrug. No recipes offer earth day chips and dips. You could have some soylent Green dip. How about that? Isn't that really what these people want? That'd be the perfect way.

We should come up with some Soylent Green recipes. Everything green, right? Because green, green holiday. When friends and beloved gather together in celebration of the miracle of a living planet. He doesn't say sentient, but that's implied by a lot of these Hollywood types. But the bottom line is, why would you have a chip and dip, right? Why would you have a holiday to celebrate the fact that these people don't want you to eat anything? Anything.

Maybe bugs, but maybe not even bugs. I mean, I've seen articles where they say, but, but, you know, ultimately, what do we do about the bugs? The bugs even use, um, energy and, and, uh, have, uh, gases and so forth. They don't want you to eat. They don't want you to breathe. They don't want you to live. So why would we celebrate this thing? He goes on to say, we find the ill-defined nature of the only day honoring the place that makes life itself possible more than a little sacrilegious, they said. So on this 53rd Earth

Day, we thought it'd be useful to pose what a real Earth Day should represent, and a new approach to worship. What do we say of a religion that has been characterized by half a century of false prophecies, false doomsday prophecies? I mean, we're talking about 53 years of this. Again, a half century of people out there, the world is going to end. Repent of your energy uses and so forth. And they've been wrong about everything.

Again, the first eight years or so, it was going to be a new winter that was going to freeze everybody down. And we're all going to die from global cooling and then all of a sudden they did a complete 180 and it became about global warming and then when the global warming wasn't happening they made it about so-called climate change and then when that wasn't happening what they did was with this pandemic they gave us all of the same things to do that they really wanted to do with the climate thing that's why i say it's a mcguffin they've got this list of things that they want depopulation at the top of it and they just change whatever it is that's uh you know you got to be afraid of it is not a

religion it is a mass murder suicide cult and i I never drank the Kool-Aid. And I didn't have their chip and dip. Their Soylent Green chip and dip either. New York City, to support this. New York City had its warmest January on record. And I've read to you the statements 10 years ago from RFK Jr. Saying we're never going to have snow again in the Northeast. I love the snow.

My kids will never see the snow. Within two years, they had record snowfall in Washington, D.C., far south of where he was talking about. It's called weather. It always changes. I wish we could go back to the days of Mark Twain, where he said, everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it. Well, these people are all talk and they're busy doing something about it, but they have

no idea. They pretend that they know what the weather is going to be like decades in advance. And now after decades of false prophecies about glaciers disappearing, snow disappearing, and all the rest of this stuff. They should be disappearing, but they're not. The first Earth Day, he says, was co-chaired by Republican Senator McCloskey and Democrat Senator Gaylord Nelson in 1970, brought more than 20 million people, a tenth of the U.S. population at the time, to the streets.

Well, what is conveniently missing from this essay on time is any discussion about the centrality of Paul Ehrlich and his book, The Population Bomb. He was the one who was the guiding impact on this. These are the politicians who were piggybacking on his fear campaign, but he was, and is always about depopulation mass murder and sterilization is what they're about. Earth day, 1970 remains repeatedly quote the largest single day protest in human history.

Uh, I was not part of that. Uh, we remember when Aaron big cities still hurt our young lungs and when rivers are so polluted that they repeatedly caught fire. Well, again, that was the justification for them to create the EPA. It was supposed to clean up pollution.

Nobody likes pollution, but it didn't take long for them to change their mission into not pollution but into prohibition. As I've said before, the EPA has now become the emissions prohibition agency. And it is the emissions that they want to prohibit that they claim give them the authority to omit everything in our lives. Whether you're talking about the way you cook food or cool or heat your house or drive your car.

And they want to take everything away from you, including the food itself. Forget about how you're going to cook your food and how they're going to dictate how you cook your food. They don't even want you to have that food. They want to omit everything. Using emissions even to get rid of meat and dairy. So it was sold to us as being about pollution when it was really about depopulation. And then they use this to make it about prohibition. The extinction crisis, uh, this going back to their, um, op-ed thing here, the extinction crisis,

the toxic chemical crisis, the climate crisis, the acidification of the seas, the plastics, tsunami, see everything is doomsday, doomsday, doomsday. We're all going to die. And of course we weren't dying from that. You know, we're dying now from the vaccines, right? These same people don't have any problem with the vaccine. Genetic coat injections, no problem. You must take it, right?

These pose existential threats to planetary and societal stability, even to civilization itself. And we know, you know, this white privileged guy who's going to become king of England, Charles, he's been there at the front of his Earth League, and they're talking about having a global constitution and a planetary council. And, you know, so they've got a constitutional legislature, an executive branch, and judiciary that's going to rule us all based on climate, based on their imagined emissions and which ones are good and which ones are bad and all the rest of this stuff. Now, that's where they talk about societal stability. It's become, and it will continue to be the justification for a one world government. Even when you talk about CBDC, what are they talking about? Climate. It's at the center of

that. We have to prohibit all crypto because of climate issues, right? We don't care about wars. That doesn't affect the climate. We don't care about the surveillance state and all the massive computing power that is being used to surveil us and to biometric surveillance, real-time analysis, data mining, and all the rest. We're not worried about artificial intelligence creating this, aiding them in this panopticon. We're not concerned about any of that stuff. No, we're only concerned about Bitcoin mining and things like that, crypto mining. So that's got to be shut down. They will use climate as excuse, the MacGuffin,

for anything that they want to get rid of. And so now, you know, we've gone from a plan-demic to a planet-demic, if you want to think of it that way. That's the other MacGuffin, right? The climate MacGuffin. You got of it that way, that's the other MacGuffin, right? The climate MacGuffin, you got the COVID MacGuffin, the climate MacGuffin,

you got the plan Demick, you got the planet Demick, the planet MacGuffin. This is why I say, you know, he's got to RFKJ. That's got to come clean on the fact that he was such a hardcore believer in this, that he was demanding that people be locked up, not just censored, but jailed.

If you denied his climate fantasies, that there's going to be no snow in the Northeast. We're done. No more snow in the Northeast. I just know it's never coming back. And that's what these people are trying to sell here. Oh, we had the warmest winter on record in New York City, and so that's evidence that this is happening here. Now, he's got to talk about maybe he has changed

after he was the brunt of censorship, but he hasn't said that, and he hasn't pulled back from any of this climate stuff. As a matter of fact, like I said, you look at his speech, and it's all still this stuff about magic, Mother Earth, and all the rest of this stuff. That's the way God speaks to us. God is in the earth and all the rest of it.

That's nothing but pagan whoop-dee-doo. Let's take a look at what established religions get right and where we might take a cue at what established religions get right and where we might take a cue. So the time writers, they said, uh, most of us know in the back of our minds at Christmas and Hanukkah fall around

the time of the winter solstice that Eastern Passover celebrate in tandem with the arrival of spring. No, um, the, um, this is nature worshiping paganism. And in the case of Christmas, I've said many times that I think that that was, I don't believe that's when Jesus was born, that time of year.

That's my personal beliefs. I can explain to you why I don't think that's the case. But I think that it was set up in direct opposition to pagan festivals around the winter solstice and things like that that's not the case with hanukkah hanukkah was about something that happened with the um you know the occupation and then you know a kind of a you know the revolt of the maccabees and that type of thing it had nothing to do with it being in opposition to that i think that christ Christmas and with all the different traditions that we have with Yule logs and everything, it's very clear. They were trying to take over a pagan holiday that was very popular and, you know, make it about an event for which we don't have a time given. But we do know the time of Passover. We do know the time of,

and again, Easter is not really based on Passover. It's based on a solar calendar is why the two of them are moving around. Passover was based on a lunar calendar, and that was the time of Christ's crucifixion and resurrection. And so that's, um, uh, again, those things were, were there and, um, uh, they were not, uh, Eastern Passover were definitely not set up to, to respond to a, uh, paganism that was there that was long before, uh, any of that. So if anybody's copying anybody, it's probably the other way around. Nevertheless, again, he keeps going back to nature. This is all about nature

worshiping paganism. And he says, we might look at what religions. Next thing he says, oh, the time that we should do it? Yeah, it's great. Earth Day is kind of in the spring, so yeah, make it about rebirth and all the rest of this stuff. And of course, what he's trying to do is to take over Christian

and Jewish traditions and make them pagan traditions. he's trying to do is to take over Christian and Jewish traditions and make them pagan traditions. He's trying to reverse everything from his perspective. He thinks that these things took over the pagan holidays, so let's reverse it. Again, I don't believe that. But he says, let's also take a look at what religions do to help us form community and to mark life's important benchmarks. So again, he's looking at religion from a purely secular standpoint.

He doesn't believe in God. He thinks earth is God. Nature is God. But he says, look, we have certain things that religion really helps us to deal with. That's what he's saying. Birth, maturity, marriage, and death. And when he talks about maturity, he's talking about, you know, like a coming of age celebration, like a bar mitzvah or something,

or a confirmation or something like that. But, you know, when he talks about birth, these are the people who are pushing abortion. When he talks about maturity, these are the people who say, we want to get rid of the family and parental rights. And when he talks about marriage, well, we know where these people are on marriage and the family. And then he talks about death. These are the people who are pushing abortion again and euthanasia,

euthanasia. That's what we get when we separate these major life events from any firm moral code. So he says, birth, that ecstatic co-joining of atoms and molecules resulting in sentience might prompt a ritual of truthfully and factually recounting how we uh, we're earning an hour early. What's going on? Um, I think we're a little bit early. Yeah. We got another hour. I'm not done yet. Yeah. Travis is not feeling good. And, uh, so I've got some ringers in here for us, uh, that are doing this. Um, I don't know if that triggered by accident or if that was deliberate. Uh, anyway, um um my son is doing it says uh gather the family around the earth day table for the traditional earth day bugs

yeah instead of pecan pie you got roaches there on the top of it you know it's uh anyway you know he looks at birth and he doesn't see God as part of that, and that really is sad. It is not these milestones in our life for which we have religion as Christians. As Christians, we see that this life is important, but it is not the ultimate thing. And we understand that we're not just progressing towards death. We have a confident expectation that we're going to live forever. And that is the key thing. That is what Easter is about. He doesn't understand that. He said the covenant of marriage, he said that might be an opportunity for us, those of us in Earth Day, to remind young people to consider the burden of children,

the burden that children place on the planet, and to make vows of sustainable patterns of behavior going forth. See, that's it. It's anti-human, anti-family, anti-child. That's why you have abortion. That's why you have euthanasia, because this is permeate. anti-family, anti-child. That's why you have abortion. That's why you have euthanasia. Because this is permeate, this hopelessness that sees this life as being all that there is

and seeing this planet as some freak accident of nature. And how do we keep this thing from just disappearing? As Christians, we see it very differently. We're here to enjoy what God has provided, even though it is a fallen creation because of what man has done. It is our job to be good stewards of that, and we look forward to a hope that is not there if people are simply materialistic. He said, so he says, we celebrate the fact with Earth Day that nothing became something. He actually says that. If there was ever nothing, there could, if we had a situation

where there was nothing that existed, then you still would have nothing. You can't get something from nothing. That is not science. That is not reality. That is not even materialism, that you're going to get something from nothing. That is not the case. And it formed a universe in which random pulses of energy and matter coalesced into beings who are writing op-ed pieces. This is the insanity of their position.

If there was never anything, and that includes an intelligence to organize this stuff, it never would have happened. If it was just raw materials and raw energy that was swirling around, it would no more organize into life than you would have a tornado in a junkyard building a brick building. You open up the window of your office and you've got a breeze coming in. Does it order the papers or does it disorder the papers? And of course we know the second law of thermodynamics says that entropy increases. Things are cooling off.

Things are becoming more and more disordered. They're decaying, all of this. What is it that sustains all of that? He says, what if our celebration of Earth Day contained stories about the prophets of natural Earth knowledge, like Darwin and Rachel Carson? Well, why don't we include in there Al Gore,

even RFKJ? All of these false prophets, people like Michael Mann, the high priest of the hockey stick. What if we included all these false prophets? See, that's the problem. These people have crafted their own version of idolatry. And it is because he talks about religion. Again, the human heart knows that there is something bigger

than themselves. Just as we know there's certain moral issues that are there. And so we craft what we don't know about. And they don't look at it. What if we created a book? And we used that book not to scold our children into following commandments, but rather to light a path forward

that encouraged discovery and reverence and gratitude for relationships? What he's talking about is a religion of law without grace, right? Where is his, he is going to have commandments. He's got a lot of commandments. Tell me that the EPA and the environmentalists are not filled with commandments. They know what they want to see happen, whether it is right or not. And they are going to beat you into submission. They've got a lot of laws. Every religion has its traditions and its laws.

What is unique about Christianity is that it has grace. The law is there to tell us how we have fallen short. Christ is there to give us a new start. And then there is a power that millions, tens of millions of people could testify to in this life, and untold numbers of people have testified to it in the past. People who are witnesses, that's what martyr means in Greek, and who gave their lives because of what they knew, had witnessed, and in many cases experienced directly. So a whole new continent, he said, of scientific knowledge has been revealed to us

since America's first and second religious great awakenings. You see, he understands that America was founded on the Christian principles with the first and second great awakening. And you need to understand that what is going to be founded upon this climate issue is Marxism. It's all about Marxism. It's about taking things down to zero and a great reset. There's nothing new about a great reset.

That's always been a part of Marxism and then creating their dystopian society on top of that with lots of laws and rules about what you can and cannot do, what you can and cannot eat. It's amazing. Yeah. Yeah. We're going to light the path forward. No, it is not a positive vision. It is not a vision that will give us individual freedom. It denigrates the individual to the collective. We're going to have public health and we're going to protect the planet. And the individuals can suffer. We don't care about them. So that's another big difference between Christianity and this pagan Marxism that he's pushing. So, you know, the expectation of eternal life, a logical understanding of intelligent design,

having prophecies that we know from the dated centuries before it happened, and archaeology firmly rooting it in history. Now, he says, we need to celebrate the whole world as a living miracle. Now, you need to celebrate the person who holds the whole world in his hands. And that's the problem. And that was the problem, I think, with the speech, trying to give a vision of where things were going. That was a key problem with RFKJ.

We'll be right back. ¶¶ Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. Show, we've got a problem. What? Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right? So, basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because basically you can't hold coffee with your hands, right? I'm a scat in the, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm be ready for it.

You dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we own the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we owe the world. These people, they're supporting free speech with every mug they buy. Come on. These people, I tell you, will anyway. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

All right, and that mug that I'm drinking out of right now, first coffee and then save the world, You're listening to The David Knight Show. want to push on us uh karen said to tell you that the t-shirt is getting low in stock our one t-shirt we got some more coming coming that are different design uh but if you want to get this design it's got the left chest logo there and then on the back we've got a a logo of um the david knight show with a sword and a microphone as the hilt of the sword so those are still in stock but they're starting to get low. Like I said, we've got a new design that'll be coming out pretty soon. So I'm anxious to get that out. It's pretty much ready to go, but I'm going to do the, we got to do the pictures and the marketing stuff for it. I'm not finished with climate yet. I did have a couple of people make some comments and a tip. Thank you much on rumble christine one two three five

thank you very much for the tip and kwd 68 says the pope created commandments for the environment that's right well commandments for us to take care of the environment that was one of the things about this pope that a lot of conservative catholics were like what is going he's got you know the paki mama thing you know this pagan uh thing from the amazon somebody went there when they were using that in some ceremonies in the vatican and they threw that thing in the river where it belongs but uh the fact that he would do this encyclical on the environment that would be one of his biggest priorities from the very beginning was very telling. And the person that he had as part of his Vatican Scientific Advisory Board was John Schellenhuber, who has always been a big depopulation guy,

just like Paul Ehrlich. Climate change, Syrian girl says, machine washable. I love it. Can I put it in the dryer? Yes, you can. Well, as long as you've got some foam around it, it might break it in the dryer. Climate change is the last priority for Americans, and it has dropped as an issue that must be dealt with immediately. But see, the opposite of that is true as well. A lot of people don't think that's an important issue right now now because look at how many things are coming to a head as a crisis, right? You know, we've got a financial crisis. We're, you know, caught between

hyperinflation and recession, and we're likely to get both, you know, both inflation and recession. We might get hyperinflation. We might get a depression. You look at that, you look at the impending war, you look at them trying to reset everything. But of course, that is part of this, the reset is. And so climate change is way down on the list of priorities for people. And that's including on the list of threats. A lot of Americans have it, I think, too far down because I believe that that is going to be the justification that they're going to use for many things. Now, to take our cars, to take our money, all the rest of this stuff. Electric vehicle demand has slumped 65% in a year. And this is coming from the auto trader. I was surprised that the auto trader has an annual report that they put out called the road to 2030. Auto trader, where you buy and sell used cars, is anticipating the day when nobody will have cars.

I mean, this is the insanity of it. This is why I say, you got to sound the alarm, right? One if by sea, two if by land or whatever, vice versa. The company's road to 2030 blamed the decline in demand on electric vehicles on, wait for it, premium price tags, cost of living crisis, higher interest rates, and increases in energy prices. That's right, because you know what? The electric cars still take energy. And they take more of it because they're so heavy.

That makes them fundamentally inefficient, the fact that they are so heavy. You know, we're not talking about something that weighs a ton. We're talking about something that weighs two or three tons to move around. That requires more energy. The feds, meanwhile, have no data on how the regulations have reduced emissions. This is an audit coming out of Canada. It's open-ended, right? Does it work? Who cares? It wasn't necessary to work. We don't care about emissions. It's never been about emissions. It's been about omissions.

And so if you play this game and you say, well, I think that we can control emissions better this way and do that. No. If you start to play that game, you've lost already. If you start to indulge in their fantasy world, you've just got to point out that the emissions don't matter. And they don't matter to them either, or they would be measuring them, wouldn't they? Wouldn't they want to know if these measures worked? Because, hey, if they don't work and it's a real crisis, you better ramp it up a lot faster than you're doing right now. But they don't know and they don't care because that's not what it's about. It's about changing society with chaos, with disruption,

doing it from the inside and doing it iteratively. And so in Canada, they put out a report on Earth Day from the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development indicating that environment and climate change Canada does not attribute emission results to specific regulations. We don't know. We're just going to take things away from you. We don't know if it's going to affect our MacGuffin or not. We don't care. The federal government does not know if regulations to limit methane emissions are achieving their target. The audit said the report, the audit found that large sources of methane emissions were unaccounted for in inventories and had not been covered by any existing regulations. The person in charge of it said, without comprehensive impact information, the federal government does not know whether it is using the right tools to sufficiently reduce emissions to meet its target.

Again, they don't care. We just got to do something. What? Well, what I always wanted to do. That's what we got to do. The audit said the government took too long to develop regulations given the urgency of the climate crisis. Oh, we need a warp speed.

MacGuffin MacGuffin is no good unless it's done without any testing or data, right? It's just got to go fast. That's the key thing about a MacGuffin. It's got to go at warp speed. The report was critical that it took more than five years to develop clean fuel regulations, but they still don't know if those regulations work or not. And they don't care, really.

They'll just keep on adding more regulations. And by the way, RFKJ likes to talk and he's right to talk about how this lockdown and the COVID pandemic was the massive transfer of wealth from the middle class and the poor to the most wealthy people on earth. Well, guess what? The climate MacGuffin that he supports has been even worse. Look at this. Big banks and corporations are getting 90% of Biden's green energy credits, says a congressional study. It is a massive transfer of wealth from us to them to take everything from us to make sure that the world is their oyster and it is our prison.

That is what this is really about jason barker rare earth minerals for evs require vast amounts of fuel to mine and to process that's right and to transport and china is moving in on the lithium now in afghanistan you see the reasons that we were in afghanistan i've said for the longest time i said we were there for the poppies you know for opioids and we were there for lithium and that i believed was the reason why especially the lithium why the department of defense said no we're going to be there for at least 20 years probably longer than that they got thrown out they didn't leave they wanted to stay there for the lithium and for the opioids um narrow way narrow gate ministries the banks have locked down credit so that many people cannot move that's

right so housing and auto loans are very hard to obtain yet why would someone want to buy a seventy thousand dollar plus car anyway exactly um most of the green and now's a good time to learn auto mechanics as much as you can, maybe even how to start doing some 3d printing of parts. Because that's what, um, um, Jay Leno and his garage, you know, he, he likes to collect these really old cars and of course he can't get parts for them. And so they had to start fabricating those parts. He's been doing that kind of stuff for a long time. Uh, but the technology is going to push this stuff out to a lot of people so i get with some makers and figure out how you can make some parts that are going to withstand the temperatures and pressures if you can i mean they're starting to make 3d print some firearms

so you know that may be a possibility but it will be a possibility. Most of the green energy tax benefits provided by Biden's $750 billion Inflation Reduction Act are going into the coffers of big banks and billion-dollar corporations, according to House and Ways Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith from Missouri. He said while Biden's supercharged Inflation Red reduction act, I'm sorry. No, that was the IRS, not the IRA. They have so many, they have so many different programs and prohibitions and bureaucracies that they can't come up with unique, um, uh, three letter call words there. So the supercharged IRS is warming up to target working Americans.

His administration is getting ready to spend those tax dollars to subsidize special interest green energy projects of billion-dollar companies and of billionaires. Many of the same companies getting green corporate welfare checks have shed their American identity to do business with the Chinese communist party. Oh yeah. You know, people like Elon Musk,

for example, right? All of them, all of them do that. Uh, so they said, uh, Biden signed the IRA,

the inflation reduction act, which was a big green bill, uh, into law August 2nd, 2022 claiming during a white House ceremony that the bill represents the federal government's, quote, most aggressive action ever, ever, ever, ever, to quote Biden, in confronting the climate crisis and strengthening our economic, our energy security. No, it didn't strengthen our energy security. He is trying to make sure we don't have any energy. But he repeated that word ever four times. But seven and a half months after

the ceremony, among the major findings of the analysis are that firms with over a billion dollars in sales are set to receive more than 90% of the green energy tax subsidies provided by the IRA, with large banks and insurers receiving in excess of 50% of the green energy tax breaks, far more than any other industry or sector. So it's going to the bankers. Oh, what a surprise. You know, which is kind of what happened to the big companies and the bankers and so forth, the PPP, right?

That was supposed to help small businesses that were told they were non-essential, so shut down. And then Steve Mnuchin, Trump's Goldman Sachs banker in charge of the Treasury Department, changed the definition of small companies, 500 or less employees at a location. And as I've talked about many times, 5% of the companies got more than 50% of the money. This is even worse, by the way. RFKJ has talked a lot about this massive transfer of wealth, about crony capitalism, about corruption, how the big guys looted everyone over this pandemic. The green stuff that RFKJ doesn't want to talk about is even worse.

Most over 50% of the money going to the banks and 90% of the money going to billionaires and giant corporations. And then they have their youthful idiots. I've talked many times about these people, the Extinction Rebellion people. They're blocking traffic in the UK, driving people nuts. They're gluing their hands to roads and to and to showrooms of, uh, the Porsche showroom and things like that. Um, and it's been pretty funny, you know, one of the ones where they glued their hand to the, to the side, to the road, they came out with a chisel or

something and, and cut the concrete, uh, out, uh, you know, chipped it out, made a pothole there, uh, and left the person's hand glued to the road surface. You know, they got a great big mitten of concrete there. And when they did it in the Porsche showroom, they went in and glued themselves to the floor, a couple of them. And then they started complaining they needed to go to the bathroom they turned off in the portia showroom they turn off uh the uh heating let them get cold and then they said why are we going to go to the bathroom too and i was like sorry you know i should have thought of that

um but uh then you had them you know putting graffiti over a lot of different things they cut down um they cut down a tree or something near the Brandenburg Gate. But of course, they've also been doing things like this. Here they are pouring assimilated blood over a mummy at an Egyptian museum in Barcelona. So in this particular one, they've got syrup and Beetlejuice mixed together. I'm sorry, Beetlejuice, Beetroot, Beetroot juice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice. So it's Beetroot juice and syrup to make it like blood just to deface things.

And you've seen them throwing, you know, ketchup and stuff like that on paintings, you know, trying to destroy classic paintings. Here's one where they jumped into a billiard tournament, jumped on the pool table here, and messed up everything as people were playing pool in a professional tournament. He jumps on it and starts throwing orange powder all over the place and knocking the balls out of the pool. He's been randomly moved by the audience, but the play is going to have to be suspended while they knocking the balls out of the table. It's been randomly moved by the audience,

but play is going to have to be suspended while they deal with the mess on the table. Never seen the like of this at the Crucible. How extraordinary. Yeah, what a nuisance they've become. People playing goal have to be suspended. I don't know how they're going to sort this out, do you? Love the narrator. Oh, look at this.

Oh, look at this. How i'm going to sort this out okay you get the idea my son reminds me of that time that they went up and glued themselves to the podium at a concert i think that was in germany wasn't it and the audience was booing them you know they're giving their manifesto or whatever and uh the people who are it's like a railing railing on a podium the people were there came out and the railing just lifted up so they just lifted the thing up and walked the people off stage and everybody applauded so they've been real nuisances and they're constantly blocking the roads in the uk until the government can get out there and you, put posts and bollards and things to block off the roads like they're doing

in Oxford and Cambridge to separate into little 15 minute zones, stop people from traveling. So in light of all of that, uh, the founder, the co-founder of extinction rebellion has now been photographed an amazing act of hypocrisy. She went to the supermarket. She was spotted by an eagle-eyed observer at the supermarket

loading up on a variety of decidedly non-local organic foods. And these are things that they've been shaming people for having. And she's loading up on it. Out of season fruit and vegetables generate the highest emissions as they often need to be refrigerated while being transported. They've said in the past, lecturing people. See, she's got her bananas there, things like that. So how far will Bradbrook, is her name, how far will her goodies traveled aboard carbon

spewing conveyances? And so somebody created a chart there. There we go. How far her food has traveled? Well, she had grapes that went 7,200 miles from Chile. She had green tea that traveled 5,700 miles from Vietnam. Oranges that went 800 miles from Spain. Lemons, also 800 miles from Vietnam, oranges that went 800 miles from Spain, lemons also 800 miles from Spain, kiwi fruits, 900 miles from Italy, red grapefruit, 2,000 miles from Cyprus, a

total of 17,400 miles. Well, look, this is one of the reasons why we say when they shut down transportation as they're trying to do, when they create chaos by shutting down the grid, by shutting down our energy, by doing all these other things, these are the types of things that all of us are not going to be able to get. That's why you need to start looking for your own survival, not just storing things, but also things that can be grown locally, things that you can grow locally.

Because everything in our society, especially our food, is just-in-time delivery. And it has all of these long supply chains where things are transported 5,000, 6,000, 7,000 miles from their source to the grocery store. They said the contents of this woman's shopping trolley speaks volumes about the hypocrisy of people who think nothing of causing chaos, said an MP, a Tory MP, Chris Loader. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so predictable. Extinction Rebellion's leaders clearly live by the mantra, as i do not as do as i say not as i do then after she loaded up on all this stuff that had been transferred everywhere she gets into her car which is a diesel it's not even a gasoline car it's a diesel which they hate with a passion

unlike many of the victims of her organization she was not impeded by a climate awareness roadblock. They said, we can only hope that when she gets home, she splashed paint across her car to teach herself a lesson. Because that's what they've been doing to other people. Buying fruit flown halfway around the world and non-recyclable packaging. Then driving home in a diesel motor. What a towering hypocrite, I wrote. She's previously come under fire for her car. She justified it, you know, just as Al Gore and these other people justify their private jets.

She needed it. She needed it. She said, the problem is there's just not enough public transportation, and the electric vehicles are too expensive, and I've got to take my kids to athletic activities. She's a soccer mom when she's not out there destroying other people's lives. Her humiliation comes just as Just Stop Oil, an Extinction Rebellion fellow traveler,

says that it won't rule out disrupting the May 8th coronation of King Charles. Well, go ahead, be my guest. I really don't care about that. The man formerly known as Prince Andrew is going to be there. He's going stag. He's leaving the nag at home. But Germany faces a gas shortage. Russia has enough gas to last a century.

Oh. So when we look at this, just understand that, and I've shown the magazines many times, going back to 1979 when we had the OPEC oil embargo. At that point in time, it was foreign enemies who were trying to destroy our energy and impoverish us instead of domestic enemies like Joe Biden and the Greens. And at that time, you know, the mantra with everybody was, hey, we got to find some alternative sources of energy because

our main thing has been oil and they're going to shut that down. But now it's all about the pollution and we got to keep it in the ground and we got to stop oil production. We got to stop all energy production really, because they don't have an alternative that's viable yet. You know, the solar for the grid is not viable for you. Yes. If you want to have a backup and get off of the grid, that's a great thing to have, but it's not a solution for the grid. And they just don't want you to have any energy. And so at the time, in 1979, as I pointed out many times, I kept Time Magazine and Newsweek because they were all saying that we're going to run out of oil and natural gas in the 80s.

By the mid-80s, both of them were going to be gone. And yet they said that we had 666 years of coal left. So, you know, which was the one that they focused on first to prohibit. Of course, that was coal. We have nearly seven centuries worth of coal, at least that is still left.

The Russians have a century of gas, and the Germans don't have anything. And in the wake of all this stuff, just so that you understand that emissions are not the issue, Germany is shutting down its nuclear power plants. Now, look, I have issues with that technology. I'm concerned about waste storage with that. That's a long-term problem.

That was the problem at Fukushima was the stored waste when they had the flood. So we're kicking the can down the road for that stuff, but look, it has zero emissions. So if they're going to say that this is about the emissions and they're shutting down the nuclear power plants, no. It's not about that. It's about shutting down energy to the society.

They're being attacked, as we are, by their own leaders. And so, you know, the report premised a cold winter scenario on the 2010-2011 winter season in Europe that witnessed an historic cold temperature in Ireland, France, the UK, and parts of Scandinavia. But they don't really care, right? Just shut it all down. And as we look at this, right, they're having record colds as they're looking

at this stuff, and yet we know that it's going the other way because of New York City, but what happened in California? Different weather, different places, different years. It's always changing. But the Greens are dragging Germany down with their foreign and their energy policies. This is from RT, from a political analyst there. He says, systematically cutting off Berlin's international partnerships and access to cheap energy that may prove to be the country's downfall. This is the German foreign minister who

is part of the Green Party in this coalition. And so she has now seized control of the foreign ministry. The Greens are seeking to dismantle Berlin's geopolitical relationship with China while also going full throttle with Moscow and having no alternatives for any of this stuff. Nope, we're not going to deal with China or with Moscow. We're not going to develop anything on our own. We're going to shut down our nuclear power plants as well. Gone are the days of pragmatism, prudence, and common sense.

Here are the days of divisive liberal fundamentalism, which has allowed the U.S. to readily dismantle the foundations of Germany's prosperity and economic strength. She is a disaster, and she's taking Germany down with her. Despite being the largest, most powerful economy in Europe, which has shaped the direction and the integration of a whole continent, Germany's future now looks bleak, thanks to the Greens. The escalation of the Ukraine conflict, combined with Washington's vehemently denied destruction of Nord Stream 2, has destroyed the foundation of the country's energy security and its

competitiveness industrially. The damage done is evidenced by the fact that it is forecasting to scrape a 0.3% GDP growth rate in 2023, while inflation stood at 8.7%. And she's not content just to swing the demolition ball at our country's relationship with China, its largest trading partner. They also are affecting them geopolitically as well as economically. This is what the Green Agenda can do. The Gatestone Institute, I won't go into the details of it,

but the headline says it all. What we need is a made-in-the-USA policy, and we need energy independence, and we could do both of those, but I don't think you're going to get this from any of the candidates that we're seeing there. And it's going to be something you're going to have to make it in your own community. That's what you're going to have to do. Okay. We're going to take a break and we will be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show by the way as we talk about war and the push to take us into it. And we look at this guy who has now destroyed his life, Texera, with the leaks. It turns out that his leaks were beginning 48 hours after Russia invaded Ukraine.

The Pentagon is this now catching up to it. Pentagon's humiliation, writes Zero Hedge, just grew deeper. As it turns out, National Guard Airman Jack Texera's leaks of classified documents started far earlier than has previously been reported. And again, you know, when we look at this, my concern always has been the data has been doctored. It could be real. It could be a mixture.

If it's a trick, it's going to be a mixture of truth and lies. That's the way it always works. There'd be a lot of truth in it mixed with some key lies if it was a deliberate plant. Again, they're going to make an example out of this guy. The people who did not protect their supposedly important secrets are probably not going to get looked at carefully whatsoever, but it may have been that they made it available to him, knowing what his political and other inclinations were. It turns out his stream of leaks spanned 13 months. In a March 27, 2022 post, in which he said he was citing an NSA site.

He said some big news. He told the other people in his gaming group, uh, there may be a planned withdrawal of troops West of Kiev as in all of them. And two days later, Russia announced that it was doing just that. The job I have lets me get privileges above most Intel guys, he boasted. And then later on, another chat participant cautioned him not to abuse those privileges. He replied, too late for that.

Again, the lack of judgment with young kids. And is this a situation where this stuff was fed to him, made available to him? Uh, they would have real information is necessary in any kind of operation like this. So that you get people's confidence. It's like a con man.

Uh, so far he's been charged with unlawful retention and transmission of national defense information and unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents. Those two accounts, if he's found guilty, would put him in prison for 15 years. And finally, the article in Zero Hedge says, and what sounds like it might just be a comically absurd attempt to portray him as a Russian asset, prosecutors filed new information with the court, noting that he once shot a vintage Soviet pistol. Maybe he watched from Russia with love, too.

Who knows? Ukraine official has demanded endless streams of Western military aid. We are thankful to our allies for the military help, but it is not enough. He said, never enough, right? How much is enough? Well, just a little bit more. Ukraine needs 10 times more to finish the Russian aggression this year. And he called on Western partners to cross all artificial red lines and devote 1% of GDP for weapons deliveries. So what are we talking about here?

Well, just in the case of the United States, we've given them about $120, $130 billion or so forth altogether. And if we look at the usa's gross domestic product now this is all goods as well as services produced in a country but the u.s gdp is 23 trillion dollars he wants one percent of that he wants 230 billion dollars he wants double what we've already given him it's not enough. Double it. And he wants it from everybody else as well. Double from last year. So the writers say, well, here's another question. Before we send any money to Ukraine, can we find out where the rest of our cash has gone? Well, that would be a nice start, wouldn't it? But that's not likely going

to happen. Before we take a break, I want to talk a little bit about the Second Amendment because there's been some interesting developments in this. We have a New York Times columnist over the weekend suggested that since guns are so dangerous and you're going to wind up, everybody's going to die in your house if you've got a gun to protect yourself from home intruders. He said this. He said, fight home intruders with bear spray instead of guns. They, this is what happens when you got liberals who can't read.

Uh, no, we have the right to keep and bear arms, not the right to keep bear spray. That's not, that's not what this is about. Uh, I don't know. I think I'd rather have a gun to protect myself from a bear than bear spray. And I think I'd rather have a gun to protect myself against an intruder than bear spray. Maybe he meant hairspray, you know, maybe that's because you can light that and turn it into a flamethrower, right? Just ask, uh, Dylan Mulvaney.

She probably, he probably knows, right? Uh, anyway, uh, bear spray, hairspray. What is it that you should use against intruders? Anything other than firearms? Uh, according to this person, um, the op-ed piece, uh, the person who wrote this idiotic piece, New York times columnist, Nicholas Kristoff is the idiot who wrote this idiotic piece. New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof is the idiot who wrote this. Near the end of his op-ed, he pushed gun controls that have been in place in California since the 1990s, says Breitbart.

Yet, of course, they have failed to prevent mass shootings in that state. So all the stuff that didn't work, well, let's try that again. He then admitted that he has guns on his farm but he stressed that the pursuit of personal safety is not a good reason to get one so then what does he do it for right um gun-free zones red flag laws only make gun crime worse worse as economists or john lott of course he's not just an economist, but he's somebody who has studied trends and statistics on guns and crime for a very long time. He's authored more than 100 peer-reviewed articles and 10 books on the subject. He led two seminars discussing the effectiveness or the lack of effectiveness of gun free zones and of red flag

laws and this is spot on because again this is what everybody wants in response to the tranny murderer nobody wants to look at what set her off nobody wants to look at what sent her down this path of insanity. And of course, both the Nashville shooter as well as the Louisville, Kentucky shooter, both of them were getting psychiatric help. These people were nuts. And they were probably on SSRIs. That's why I've talked about this a couple of times last week. The SSRIs. That's why I've talked about this a couple of times last week. The SSRIs alone, we talk about the ask your doctor commercials and the things that they will

prescribe for people. Well, are you depressed? Well, here's some SSRIs. Well, what is one of the well-known side effects of SSRIs? Well, to make you depressed. It enhances what you're trying to take it to get rid of. So he, John Lott, talked about the story of Nikki Gozer. She is the author of, quote, Stalked and Defenseless, How Gun Control Helped My Stalker Murder My Husband in Front of Me. She's also the executive director of the Crime Prevention Research Center, of which she is the president. Fourteen years ago, she and her late husband, Ben, operated a karaoke business.

A man the couple had met became infatuated with her and began stalking her. She had a license to carry a concealed weapon at the time, but it was illegal in her home state of Tennessee to carry a firearm in any business that served alcohol. I don't know if they changed that or not. Just in the last couple of years that they have gotten, they've embraced constitutional carry here in Tennessee. I don't know if they still have the prohibition of not being able to carry it somewhere where they're serving alcohol. If that is the case, the moonshine places have proliferated around here to such an extent that that's probably a more effective prohibition from carrying a firearm than the school zone laws that they had. You know, you can't carry a gun within

a thousand feet of a school zone that they put in under, I think it was Bill Clinton a couple of decades ago. Well, with the proliferation of all these alcohol places around here, um, that would pretty much shut it down anyway. Uh, so there, they were serving alcohol. So even though she had a license to carry concealed, she didn't carry it. Uh, the, um, her situation was known to the police, but that didn't stop the stalker. Lott said that she had stated that she isn't sure that she could have stopped the crime if she had her pistol,

but she's confident that complying with the law ensured that she couldn't protect her husband or herself. As the title of her book says, she was denied the chance. He told the people at the place where they were looking at the gun-free zones and at red flag gun laws, he said, it's a perfect example of the problems with gun-free zones. According to statistics, 94% of mass shootings since 1950 have occurred in gun-free zones. 94%. The 19-year-old man who killed 10 people in Buffalo, New York in May of 2022 has been described as a right-wing racist, he said. But he was, while he was an avowed racist, he said the shooter described himself as an environmentalist and as an eco-terrorist. In his manifesto, he claimed that minorities were damaging the environment by having too many children. So he decided to attack

black people. This is what I was talking about with the climate stuff. Depopulation. You know, too many people is going to kill the planet. Who are the people who are having too many kids? Black people are having too many kids. So I'm going to attack the black people. He saw himself first and foremost as an eco-terrorist. By the way, we can say the same thing about Margaret Sanger. That's why she put the planned unparenthood clinics in black neighborhoods. Those black people are just having too many kids.

She was a eugenicist. He was a racist. He was a racist as well and a depopulationist. So Lott says, quoting from the shooter's writings, he says, attacking in a weapon-restricted area may decrease the chance of civilian backlash. Areas where concealed weapons are outlawed or prohibited may be good areas of attack,

and areas with strict gun laws are also great places to attack. And the Louisville shooter, doing the same thing. In his manifesto, which has now been released, of course, we've not seen the manifesto of the Nashville trans shooter, but we've seen the manifesto of this guy. He was a leftist, and he wanted his shooting to draw attention

to his mental illness and the treatment options that he felt were not helping him or that were being denied to him. I don't know if he was on SSRIs or not, but I mean, that is the first thing they do for people who are struggling with this type of thing. And it only exacerbates it. But he also said that his motive was to fuel gun control. That's why he killed so many innocent people there and filmed it, filmed it. So the FBI is blocking the release of the Nashville manifesto. And as Zero Hedge points out, the question is important. Why are they holding this? It illustrates the discomforting double standards in play. Whenever a mass murder is committed by a person on the political left,

and there have been many lately, a Louisville shooter, but they've released that manifesto. If the manifesto outlines ideologically motivated intent, then it could be labeled as a terrorist act. We'll see if they label the Louisville shooting as a terrorist act. Let me ask you, if you had a shooter who goes in and kills a bunch of people, everything the same, except in his manifesto, he says, I'm shooting all these people because I want to support the right to keep and bear arms or something like that. Uh, instead of saying I, because I want to support gun control, you know, they would have, they could have tied it to something like that.

They would have called it terrorism. If it had been in support of any conservative cause, they would have called it terrorism. But since it's in support of gun control, will they call it terrorism? I don't think so. Metropolitan Nashville Council member Courtney Johnson said that the FBI has ruled out releasing the manifesto anytime soon. What I was told is her manifesto was a blueprint on total destruction. And it was so detailed at the level of what she had planned that that document in the wrong person's hands would be

astronomically dangerous. Well, she got some secret formula for death and destruction. I don't think so. As a matter of fact, one of the things that we do know is that she had looked at some places and ruled them out because they were hardened targets, because they did have security. Maybe that's what they don't want you to see. There's a ruminations about, well, I don't want to attack that place because I might get shot. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Director David Roche described the writings that he had seen

in a meeting with the Tennessee Sheriff's Association. He said, quote, the documents that we have, and I have viewed those, one is specifically a plan, and the other is some journal type of rantings. And so Zero H says, so was Audrey Hale a criminal mastermind? It's highly unlikely given that she was taken down by the police within moments

of the officers arriving on the scene. What was the magic formula that she had? Didn't have anything. So what was her expert plan for killing unarmed children? My son says, yeah, exactly. Yeah. To go to a place where the adults are unarmed as well. And that's possibly what they don't want you to see. They also don't want you to see the unhinged lunatic ravings of somebody

who has been psychologically, morally gaslighted by this system. They don't want you to see that. In other words, a message is being sent by federal agencies, the White House and others, that if you are a trans person and you commit mass murder, you will enjoy special treatment. Well, they've been sending that message for quite some time, and even in the direct aftermath of this. Again, imagine if this person had been highly associated

with some conservative cause and had a manifesto and all the rest of the stuff, and then the week of, it was done by a conservative directed at a group they politically hate, just as this transgender did to these kids in school. What if the same week there was already some white nationalist demonstration that was scheduled, a day of vengeance, and they continue in many places with most of the aspects of that? The central event was canceled, but all the rest of them continued. Of course, you know that wouldn't happen. Meanwhile, the Tennessee governor, Bill Lee,

is still trying to pander to these people, calling a special session of the Tennessee legislature to try to get a red flag gun law in, which was not really going to help in this particular case. It would have not stopped this because the police didn't know anything about this individual. The individual, even though, you know, 40, 50 years ago, as MASH was going, you had Klinger trying to get a Section 8, trying to get kicked out of the military by dressing up like a woman. So they would say, Hey, he's certifiably insane. He needs to be out of the military. No, no, that's considered to be a virtue now. So, you know, just by being a

transgender, uh, that would show this person is of the highest moral character to these people, not somebody that should be observed for some kind of schizophrenia or, um, you know, bipolar disorder or anything like that. No, no, just, uh, you can be a two spirit person and not be suffering from bipolar conditions or anything else, any other mental disorders. Uh, so, uh, nobody, the, the family didn't see anything that they thought was strange about this person who thought they were in the wrong body. That's perfectly normal today.

Police didn't think anything was unusual about that. But you've got celebrities that are going to meet with the governor. Amy Grant went to meet with the governor and Sheryl Crow. So I guess that's all it takes. Wall Street Journal said Republicans in the Tennessee legislature are strongly opposed to Lee's gun control push. They responded to Lee's drive for red flag laws by tweeting out, quote, any red flag law is a non-starter for House Republicans.

Well, I hope that is the case. We don't need more gun laws. We need to stop turning people, uh, making people crazy at a young age, by the way, uh, and North Carolina and, um, Gaston County, North Carolina, just to show how bad everything is getting. I mean, there's all these different cases of people getting shot at now when they drive up to a house, I guess the day of door-to-door encyclopedia sales is definitely over. Even if we didn't have the internet, your life expectancy

would be pretty low. But I mean, all of these different things that people are getting shot at for driving up to the wrong house or whatever. In this particular case, you got a thug who shot a six-year-old girl and her family in North Carolina. This is a case of somebody who should have been in jail and the system didn't turn the person out. So you want to talk about red flag gun laws? What kind of a system lets a person, this guy that shot three people, including a six-year-old girl in the face, was free on bond and a brutal sledgehammer attack on his girlfriend. So why is he free on bond? And not only that, but it was an unsecured bond.

$250,000 bond, but it's not secured with anything. He just promises to come back. What does that mean when you put a dollar figure on that? This type of thing is happening even in small town, North Carolina. Um, person said the man came running up here and he shot my daddy. He just finished wasting all of his bullets. We don't even know the man, a bullet grazed the girl's cheek and, uh, her mom, Ashley Hildebrand's elbow. Her father, however, was seriously hurt. Jamie White, father, rushed to protect her and was shot in the back and is in serious condition. Singletary, the guy who shot her, allegedly opened fire after children playing at the White home,

went into his yard to retrieve a basketball. And so the wife said she got to see her husband, Jamie White, for the first time Thursday. He's got a liver that is split. He has a piece of lung that is missing, and he has a broken rib and something going on with his abdomen, she said. Singletary, the guy who did the shooting, was free at the time of the shooting again on an unsecured bond for a vicious sledgehammer assault on his 21 year old girlfriend. An unsecured bond does not require any collateral,

only a promise to return to court. So what do you put a dollar figure on it? I don't understand. But again, this is let's get rid of bond bonds and let's just, you know, catch and release people for everything, including violence like that. Family members said that William White tried to draw gunfire toward himself to protect his family.

A Singletary unloaded an entire magazine toward his neighbor. He was shot in the back in his own front yard. And so his wife said, he looked at my husband and my daughter and told them, I'm going to kill you. This is the kind of person that is let out now without any bail. Meanwhile, the family that has been shot, they have a GoFundMe to help them.

So far, they've raised $58,000. They don't have any insurance. He can't work. So again, they've raised $58,000. They don't have any insurance. He can't work. So again, if you take a look at that. Meanwhile, let's take a look at the ATF. You had a congressional hearing, House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing. Jake Elzey, a Republican from Texas, asked the guy who is director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, what is an assault weapon? And he struggles with this, just like when you ask a Democrat, what is a woman?

You ask a Democrat, what is an assault weapon? And here's what you're going to get. As a gun owner of many different types and a 20-year military veteran, I have some expertise in weaponry and self-defense weapons. What could you, in 15 seconds, would you define an assault weapon for me? So if you go after that 15 seconds, I'll just interrupt you. So I'll go shorter than that because I honestly, I do think that's a, if Congress wishes to take that up, I think Congress would have to do the work. Sorry, your time is up. But we would be there to provide technical assistance. I, unlike you, I'm not a firearms expert to the same extent as you may be,

but we have people at ATF who can talk about velocity of firearms, what damage different kinds of firearms cause, so that whatever determination you chose to make would be an informed one. Yeah, yeah. You want to say, you know, we've got people at the atf why is that uh oh we are in the time he says he said we got people at the atf he said they can talk about the velocity of firearms is that how fast you sling them at people the velocity of fire not the velocity of the ammunition even as if that mattered. It doesn't matter. Kind of like the judge, they say, can you define pornography?

I don't know what it is, but I know it when I see it. I don't know what an assault weapon is, but I'll tell you, you can't have one. Thanks for joining us. The Common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your

prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you.