The David Knight Show - 25Oct22 Globalists Double Down on GlobalID & WHO Power to Lock Nations Down

Episode Date: October 25, 2022

Twelve states that won’t make the Covid jab a requirement for school. 3:03Governors and politicians who say NO "mandate" are still pushing Covid shots! 8:32TrumpShots are so dangerous that we've forgotten the MMR vaccine has caused massive number of injuries and deaths to children over the years. 11:38There are more vaccine exemptions for school than you may realize. Here's a quick breakdown by state. 17:58Newsom declares Covid is going to disappear from California in five months. Wow! How's he know? 20:44European Union doubles down on its commitment to the continued use of lockdowns, masks, vaccine passports, and other non-pharmaceutical measures — AND giving legally binding power to WHO to lock entire countries down via "Pandemic Treaty" 28:26Danielle Smith is a breath of fresh air after Jason Kenney but not yet ready to fully take on the full agenda. 41:55"The Love of Money - the Root of all Pharma" — Pfizer raises the price of the jab by 400% as demand for crashes 51:54Age doesn't matter to Joe Biden, whether it's his health or the mutilation of minors. 57:28Laptop says Hunter committed 459 crimes and Joe at least 6 crimes 1:17:34"The Line" (in the Sand) of "Smart Cities" dystopia. Saudi authorities have carried out demolitions in 60 different neighborhoods, mostly in the southern part of the city. 1:29:13New Alberta premier promises to amend the Human Rights Act to ban discrimination based on vaccination status. 1:34:50Rishi Sunak, weaponing financial control for climate MacGuffin 1:46:25David’s next guest - The Gun Guy", Guy A. Relford, attorney and radio host  1:50:25Where do you see the line being drawn between what corporations are allowed to do on behalf of the government and what they’re not? 1:59:55ATF’s job now is to put you out of business, says ATF agent 2:11:44What’s the most egregious example of discarding search warrants? 2:25:40Where are we politically on Second Amendment rights? 2:28:12The biggest threat to our democracy? 2:36:17Does Supreme Court’s decision in the West Virginia case offer hope for reigning in unaccountable bureaucracies? 2:40:12Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Take your business international. Enterprise Europe Network is the world's largest network providing free support and advice to SMEs with global ambitions. With over 450 partner organisations worldwide, we bring together unparalleled expertise to serve businesses like

yours. We can help you discover partners in new markets, advance your digitization and gain valuable insights into EU funding opportunities. Take advantage of free expert advice and innovation resources. Visit een-ireland.com and take your business global today. today is the 25th of october year of our lord 2022 and day 957 of the emergency today we're going to talk about what is being planned by the european union they're pushing very hard to extend all of the control measures that they've imposed on us for the last 957 days. And as I've said before, they simply put them on pause. And now the European Union and other globalists are trying to set these things up as to permanently entrench this and to make sure they have the vaccine passports,

the European digital ID, and the rest of this stuff, and that it is all controlled by the World Health Organization and any declarations that they put out there. So they're 100% on board with the pandemic treaty and the rest of this stuff, trying to make this permanent. But yesterday, I did not get to the pharmaceutical issues, so I want to begin with that. Now, we have coming up in the third hour,'re going to be talking to guy ralphard he is a lawyer in indiana who has been honored by the nra one of only two people to get this honor uh with a distinguished advocate award he also has a radio program so we're going to talk to him about second amendment issues coming up in the third hour

so that should be um very very important, very informative, because right now under the Biden administration and what the Democrats are trying to do, there is a wealth of attacks that are coming on the Second Amendment. And so if you want to know where these people are going and what they want to do to us, the canaries in the coal mine are free speech and the ability to defend yourself.

That's what they always go for first. And if you look at the tactics that they're going to be using against that, those are going to be the control tactics, the definitionalization and all the rest of the stuff. Those are going to be the control tactics that they hit us with and every other aspect of our life. But let's begin with the pharmaceutical stuff because there was a lot of stuff that I wanted to talk about yesterday in terms of the school mandates.

We now have two Democrat governors joining 10 Republicans and refusing to mandate these COVID shots. This is from LifeSite News. They say 12 states so far have announced that they will not comply with the CDC's decision and recommendation. Many states have it written into their law that it'll automatically happen. So even though the CDC is playing this game, we're just making a recommendation. They don't have to take our recommendation. Many states are wired into that by law. But of course, we do have the 10th Amendment.

They don't have to do anything that the federal government says, let alone some kind of a quasi-independent organization like the CDC, which has one foot in private 501c3 corporation and making money off of selling these vaccines, and the other foot pretending that they are a government organization for which there is no authority in the Constitution. Let's just make that clear. You have another one of the several dozen federal agencies for which there is no constitutional authority. Anyway, the Republican states, as I mentioned last week, Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia are saying they will not

make the COVID jab a requirement for students to attend school. The two Democrat states that have come in are Colorado and Connecticut. And you have several candidates who have said, of course, if I'm elected, I will make sure that that doesn't happen as well. So that is the current status of this. And we also then have lawyers preparing to sue any state that requires this. And this is coming from the Consent Action Network, the Informed Consent Action Network, ICANN. That's Dell Big Trees organization.

They've already had some important legal victories. Their lawyer that they've hired, Aaron Seary, has represented them in some victories. And he's talking about the fact that Dell Bigtree and ICANN have already said that they are committed to opposing this in any state that tries to do it, that if necessary will do 50 different lawsuits, one in every state. ICANN has told us that it will financially support a challenge against any state. So if all 50 states require it to attend school, ICANN will support challenging the mandate in every single one of those states. The updated CDC schedules, by the way, will not take place until next school year, 2023. And so the ICANN lawyer, Aaron Seary, says, well, we're going to have time.

We're going to know in advance what's going to happen because they're going to, if they're going to impose it, they're going to tell parents, you got to get your kids vaccinated before school so there'll be a lead time there there's lead time in terms of you know when it would commence next year as well and so he says he's not going to talk about any strategies because this is something he says you know i'm not going to talk about potential legal strategies, but in the past, what they have had a victory on is in California. And they had a court found that invalidated a vaccine mandate there saying school boards in California do not have the authority to require a COVID vaccine that would apply to all school boards across California seeking to impose this. So they've already had a victory with that. But there's another way to look at this. Brian Shulhavi of Health Impact News points out what I've been saying, how troubling

this is to watch the GOP. Whenever they come out and oppose the COVID vaccine, what do they do? They don't oppose, in most cases, the COVID vaccine itself. The exception of that has now been in Florida with DeSantis and his surgeon general who have both come out and saying, this is dangerous, I don't recommend it, but I'm not going to stop anybody from getting it. But I don't recommend it. That's more than anybody else has done. But even as DeSantis does that, he's saying, and I'm not saying that you shouldn't get all the rest of the vaccines that are out there.

So that's the issue that I have. And it's the issue that Brian has as well, that they will not oppose these other vaccine mandates, the MMR shots, the polio shots, all the rest of this stuff. You know, we lose sight of the fact when we look at the VAERS account. We say, look at this. This is at the very beginning, the beginning of January. Look at this and say, look at this.

This is already, you've had as many deaths and injuries as all of the other 30 years combined. And then it became twice as many as all of the other, sorry, not 30, but 40 years combined. Right? Or 35, actually. I suppose it is 1986. So anyway, looked at it and anyway, all these others combined. Look, it's about that already, and we're only a couple weeks into this, or it's now two times, or now it's 30 times, or whatever.

And yes, the COVID-19 vaccine is in a class by itself. It's very different in the way that this thing has been set up. And far more dangerous, far, far more dangerous than any of these other vaccines. But let's not lose sight of the fact that the other ones were pretty dangerous as well. As a matter of fact, if you go back and you look at the data, why would we ignore the fact that you've had over 300,000 injuries in the VAERS database. That is pretty significant. 300,000 injuries and various deaths and things like that reported in the VAERS database.

Now, that's over a period of decades, and it's a tiny fraction of what has happened with COVID. But the other vaccines are dangerous as well. And that's the problem I have. All of these politicians, you even see it in Canada, now that there is an Alberta premier that's taking place at Jason Kennedy there. And we have an interesting clip from the new Alberta premier, Danielle Smith, and she mentions the fact that the health department there is completely corrupt and that they're taking orders from the World Economic Forum.

She goes, why would we have that happening here? So there's some positive indications there. We need to support that. We need to encourage these politicians to continue to move in the right direction, even if they only do it because they want to stay in office or get votes. We still need to encourage them in that and not just, you know, kick them to the side if they're not perfect. We need to encourage them to move in the right direction. Some of them may be just gradually coming on board because they don't really, maybe they don't understand this fully

themselves yet. We've seen that type of thing with other people. So maybe that's the case that's happening. Maybe they're, maybe they are just corrupt, but if they are just corrupt, we need to get them to at least understand that there is some accountability to us and we need to get them to at least understand that there is some accountability to us and we need to encourage them in that so yeah I have a problem with the fact that as Brian shall Javi says while here at health impact news we obviously vigorously disagree with the recommendation from the CDC this This decision has been completely politicized by the right-wing alternative media and the corporate media outlet,

Fox News. Tucker Carlson of Fox News addressed this issue, stating that if the CDC votes to recommend the vaccines be added to their immunization schedule, quote, your children will not be able to attend school without taking the COVID shot. And so that has now been picked up by many people, but they focus simply on the mandate. As he said, children will be forced to take the shot in order to get an education in the U.S. in a public school. But then he goes on to give several examples of where states require children to get the shots based on the CDC vaccine schedule.

And what he does not address is the issue with that. Brian says, mandating, that is the magic word. And we're talking about something that is emergency use authorization. The mandates and the inclusion in the children's schedule is so that they can give themselves legal immunity. They're willing to kill kids to extend their legal immunity beyond the PrEP Act, beyond the emergency declaration. So he says that some Republican governors, probably taking their cue from Tucker, have made statements to the public to vow not to institute mandates to the states. That's that magic word again, and that is mandates.

He said, but listen carefully to what these governors are saying. First of all, they're not anti-vaccine. DeSantis even takes a positive stand for the MMR vaccine, which is a three-combo vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. And it has caused major injuries and deaths to children over the years, even though no child has died from measles itself for decades. I've said this every time I've played Trump. Got to get the shots. It's going around.

You got to get these shots. He said that as they were mandating in new levels of mandates in the Northeast as well as in California. And I said, he knows better. He's older than me. We didn't have measles injections, and we didn't have any reports of anybody dying from measles either when we were children.

If that had been the case, if there had been any reports of children dying, I'm not saying that nobody did. I'm just saying it was such a truly, truly rare thing. I mean, they always like to dismiss all of the misery, suffering, and death caused by their vaccines. Oh, it's rare. It's rare. Well, no. I mean, we used to get reports, oh, look, you know, some of them were urban legends, but, you know, look at what happened with this and that type of thing.

It would go around. If you had people who had children who were dying of measles, it would have been picked up by the news. They would have told people, and the parents would not have been deliberately giving their kids measles as every parent in my generation did and we also know because i reported this back in 2018 in samoa two toddlers went in for their mmr shot first one drops dead instantly the other mother who's in line says, we're going to go.

They talked her into staying. They said, no, this doesn't have anything to do with the vaccine. Talked her into staying and getting her kid shot. That child died instantly as well. That was a big deal in Samoa. It was even picked up by the New Zealand press, but not in America. Nobody talked about it here, except me. I did talk about it. I was

surprised that nobody picked up on it. But anyway, if you look at what VAERS says, and this is in Vaccine Impact News, deaths in the U.S. during the 10-year period of 2004 to 2015, there were zero deaths from measles and there were 108 deaths due to the measles vaccines. Now the vaccine people will tell you, well, that's because we've eradicated it or maybe we've controlled it. I have covered over the years outbreaks of measles. What precipitated this new level of mandates from California? Do you remember when that happened, 2019? They said somebody who flew into the airport in LA had measles and that panicked everybody and they quarantined a whole bunch of people. And then on the basis of that story, whether it was true or not, they started escalating the mandates for measles, and also on the East Coast, requiring it for religious private schools

who had religious exemptions, saying, no, we're going to take that away. But nobody died in that. Nobody died in that presumed outbreak. But prior to that, we'd had a lot of measles outbreaks I remember one in particular that was in New York State you had four people who came down measles all of them were vaccinated at least once many of them had a follow-up booster which was not the it was it was fairly rare that you would have a booster of an MMR. They're doing boosters all the time now.

Every couple of months, they want you to get another one of these COVID shots. But it was kind of unusual for people to take a second shot. It was an admission, first of all, that it wasn't working very well. They said, yeah, we've noticed that immunity disappears. And so they started recommending that you get a follow-up after a couple of years or something like that. And so some of the people in this group of four had been vaccinated two times. All of them had been vaccinated once. Nobody died, but patient zero had been vaccinated twice. So when you say that nobody died from measles,

but 108 people died over a 10-year period from the vaccines for measles, that's 11 deaths per year. When we look at what is typically done in terms of pulling products off, do you think that if we had 11 people per year, 11 kids per year, dying from some kind of a crib, some kind of a, because I've talked about this, I haven't brought this up again,

we just had the government do a massive recall on a motorized crib because you had one child die from it, another child got strangled but didn't die. One child died. We're having 11 children per year over a decade, and they don't pull us off of the market. Why is that? Do you feel good about DeSantis and these other people cheering that vaccine? How about if they required that you put your kid in that crib where the child was just strangled? Let's assume that, you know, you had 11 kids getting strangled in that crib every year for a decade,

and the government doesn't do a recall. And not only that, but you have DeSantis, or you have Abbott, or you have any of these Republican governors saying, oh, and by the way, you're going to be required to put your kid in that crib as a toddler, as a baby, rather. You feel good about that? Because that's what we're really talking about here. So since 1990, there have been 325,054 cases of vaccine injuries and deaths

from MMR and polio and all the rest of this stuff that all these GOP governors are cheerleading. Why? Well, you know, they're saying it. Look, we don't want to give a black eye at the pharmaceutical industry, right? And I don't want to take them on. Now, we lose sight of just how dangerous these quote-unquote ordinary vaccines are when we see this extraordinary genetic code injection that Trump has plagued us with, produced it.

He also, by the way, if you look at this article, Vaccine Impact, he says, I've put together a six-minute video. So I'm not going to play it for you because it's six minutes. Uh, it's on there and he's got links to their bit shoot channel, their odyssey channel, the telegram channels. And he said in that, he's got all these different politicians cheering, uh, all of these, uh, vaccines, these, uh, um, he says, uh, they, the Republicans are pro vaccine.

And that includes a COVID-19 vaccine. Just listen to them say so in their own words. He's got Trump. He's got DeSantis. He's got Rand Paul. He's got Ron Johnson, who has done more than anybody to highlight the injuries from these vaccines. And then he also has, which I thought was interesting, a map that shows on a state-by-state basis whether the state recognizes medical, religious, and philosophical exemptions.

I was surprised to see that most states recognize all of those exemptions for kids on the vaccination schedule to attend school. California and Maine stick out, and Connecticut stick out in the sense that, and New York, of course, those states stick out in the sense that they only will give you a medical exemption, and a medical exemption is very, very hard to get because a doctor that gives you a medical exemption. And a medical exemption is very, very hard to get because a doctor that gives you that medical exemption knows that his practice is now on the line and being scrutinized.

So for all practical purposes, they have made that impossible to get. But a lot of states have all three. The vast majority of them have at least a medical and a religious exemption for your children. So you don't have to get these jabs. And don't think just because they are not nearly as bad as the GCI that they won't kill. Because, you know, 325,000 injuries and deaths over the last 30 some odd years. So Governor Newsom, by the way, is going to be ending the state of emergency in California.

The COVID emergency is going to end in February. He's got the exact date. February the 28th, the boogeyman is going to disappear from California. How is this possible? How does he put out something saying, you know, I know that we're going to be clean and clear in five months. Well, because it's always been this way. Remember, I've talked about how they would impose some new restriction. And at the time they would impose that, they would say, oh, and the next thing we're going to do in two months is this. And they would do it in two months. And as they did it,

that next step in two months, they would tell you what the next step was going to be in two months. Remember that we had both Biden and Trudeau talking about the fact that they were going to require vaccination or to transverse the border. And they said that two months before it happened. They were talking about how they were going to do that. Well, if it's an issue, why wouldn't you do it now? I mean, if you're going to do this in a couple of months, it's simply because they're following the pattern that Fauci did, saying we're going to create chaos from the inside,

and we're going to do it iteratively. Iteratively. We're going to disrupt going to do it iteratively iteratively and disrupt everything and do it iteratively uh so um when we uh the way the bablin b has uh summarized this cdc recommendation the headline is cdc announces a new initiative to promote homeschooling. And the latest bid to promote homeschooling. The CDC voted to recommend the COVID vaccine be given as part of a routine yearly immunizations for all school children. The vaccine, which has proved ineffective in preventing transmission, may soon be spreading uncommon side effects among children as early as this spring.

Many CDC members have been inspired to remove their own kids from the school system, and they wish to make that decision easier for parents across the country. They have a quote from CDC Director Walensky saying, public schools have obviously failed our society. I mean, have you seen the people responsible for public schools? I've met them. They're imbeciles. Believe me, I know a thing or two about imbeciles that she does.

Uh, speaking of Biden, uh, she says that they say Biden is reportedly conflicted on whether or not to support the recommendation. He says, uh, kids need the government to be in their lives, Jack. I don't want to risk losing them over a jab. But on the other hand, I sure love jabbing kids. At publishing time, parents across the nation thanked the CDC for managing to somehow make public schools even less attractive. Well, that is the upside on it.

Meanwhile, we have the federal government putting out another warning message this year telling kids to wear masks on Halloween. And they're not talking about the fun mask. They're talking about the filthy handkerchiefs over their faces. Even the CDC is not recommending that. But this is coming out from the Consumer Product

Safety Commission. We have so many self-serving bureaucrats and they've all got to get out in front and do something. So even though the CDC is now saying, don't even, and they did this a couple of, they did this back in September. The CDC is saying, we're now not going to recommend that you wear masks in medical office and hospital settings. So if that were the case, why would you tell kids to wear them for Halloween? Well,

there are just so many different bureaucracies that even the bureaucracies can't keep up with what they're saying to each other and to the rest of us. And they have an, a infographic on their site. You know, this, this nanny state, this article points out,

this is from reason reasons. They're, they're warning the consumer protection agency is warning parents to avoid oversized costumes because kids might trip and fall. There you go. Don't forget to wear your mask. You might trip and fall and all the rest of this stuff. I mean, you want to talk about overprotective moms.

This is to the nth degree. Despite all the warnings that they have on this infographic, about all the ways that you can die on Halloween. I guess they don't have anything there about the razor blades and apples. I don't even know if that was true or not, or that was an urban legend. Anyway, nothing about that. But the thing that they failed to mention, as Reason points out, is watch out for cars. That is a real risk. And a lot of kids who get enthusiastic about this,

they got reduced vision or whatever because of costume, they run out in the street. That is the key concern. If you've ever taken your kids trick-or-treating, you know that. So they don't mention that. Traffic-related injuries are by far the biggest threat to kids on Halloween. But instead of telling them to look both ways, they want to make sure that they don't have too big a costume and that they don't trip on their Batman cape. That's the government for you.

Now, I have listener Handy, who works for EMS, and he talks about the issues that he's getting into, even though the CDC has said you don't need to have these masks in hospital situations. You have hospitals are still pursuing that. And it's causing issues for him. He says, I told you before, the hospital here in Atlanta has had security escort me from the building while in uniform and in front of my patient for refusing to wear a face diaper. I now have at least one co-worker who was just advanced to final written notice for not being masked at Emory Johns Creek Hospital. Apparently, my employer does everything the hospital demands, even though the hospital is not my employer.

And even though the CDC is not demanding this either. CDC says it's not necessary. But the hospital does. It's all about the money. I mean, they don't want to lose that money and the hospitals did everything the federal government said to do. Including requiring

vaccine mandates because they didn't want to lose the money that was coming from Medicare and Medicaid. It's just that simple. He says, I refuse to comply since day one. So it's just a matter of time before I'm put on that final written notice and or fired, especially as they kick up the usual flu campaign fear this winter. Can't have anyone blowing holes in the narrative with a naked face and no flu so you want to pray for a handy uh as he is um facing again all of this stuff is not going away and

you don't have any candidates talking about this underlying uh emergency order. Even when Biden used that to put in the student loan things, it took more than a week for any of the politicians to point out the fact that he was doing an executive order, but they didn't point out the fact that that it was Trump's executive order that he was using. It's a look at this. He said it's over, but he used that emergency order to push through the student loan thing.

Well, it's not over as long as the Trump executive order is there. And they don't want to call attention to that because that would call attention to what Trump did. And they don't have the backbone to do that. They don't want to criticize Trump no matter what he did, no matter what he is still doing with his order. They don't want to criticize Trump no matter what he did, no matter what he is still doing with his order. They don't want to criticize. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gamblingcare.ie looking for reliable it solutions for your business at innovate we are

the it solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. So the European Union, as I mentioned, has now doubled down on their commitment

to all of these COVID rituals. Lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine passports, and not only that, but pushing to make a global pandemic treaty legally binding and to give the World Health Organization the power to lock us down without our consent. So the European Union, and it says daily skeptic, has set out its commitment to the continued use of lockdowns,

mask mandates, vaccine passports, legally binding global pandemic treaty, and at the center of all of it, a reinforced WHO. And that's their wording. At the center of it, a reinforced WHO. That's the wording from the European Union. That's what they want. At the center of all of this.

The document, published September 2nd, titled EU Response to COVID-19 Preparing for Autumn and Winter 2023, was prepared by the EU Commission. It reveals how much enthrall to the new biosecurity orthodoxy the EU leadership is, and it bodes ill for the future management of contagious disease in the bloc and globally. It proposes a framework of what they say, quote, key indicators to assess when deciding on reintroducing non-pharmaceutical measures. The masks, the passports, the lockdowns, non-pharmaceutical measures.

But of course, they have guidelines for when to introduce and to mandate the vaccines as well. You know, it was back in March when all this stuff started happening. I immediately called it medical martial law because that's what it was. And it still is. And they want to make this permanent. And they want to make it global, even though it was global, even though this was happening Everywhere in every country by every political party regardless of what these people said their political philosophy was Conservative liberal communists didn't matter right? They're all on board with this And it was medical martial law and I called it that from the very beginning

Now they want to make it legally binding because it's not. It's not legally binding. This has all been done under color of law, but they want to change the laws and the foundations to make this permanently in place and a part of our legal system. When I called it that in March, within a couple of weeks, I had the ADL as well as Daily Beast and Buzzkill. They were ridiculing me for being a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist. Funny, they haven't done a follow-up on that Because it was a conspiracy

It wasn't a theory It was already put into practice It had been put into practice for weeks The document recommends the pre-emptive Imposition of work from home And gathering limits before any rise in infections And that's exactly what we had Nobody had died

We didn't have an epidemic We certainly didn't have a pandemic anywhere when these measures were put into place. We had to do it preemptively. It was a preemptive war against our liberty, against our constitution, against our fundamental human rights. It was preemptive war. There was no justification for it then. There never was a justification for it. They couldn't lie with their statistics sufficiently to show a justification for this. They said, we're going to do this preemptively before there's any rise in infections. Try to avoid the need for more disruptive ones, such as lockdowns, closing businesses, schools, stay-at-home recommendations,

and travel restrictions. And the document stresses the need for what they call political commitment to make lockdowns and other measures work, because this is what they practiced for 20 years in their germ games. People died because you weren't draconian enough. So we have to have political commitment. I think we need to commit some of these people to prison. That's what needs to be committed. The one welcome aspect, says the Daily Skeptic,

was a clear statement to avoid disrupting children's education and lives any further. Well, again, if the goal is to keep the kids in school and to educate them, you need to understand that this is a psychological measure. That's why they're going to make an exception to it. They don't want kids out of school. They don't want kids doing Zoom from home because the parents see what's happening and the kids are not under their control.

The schools are about behavioral modification. I'll never forget, and I've mentioned it before, when Karen was getting her master's degree in education, she had a book with her, and it was B.F. Skinner's Beyond Freedom and Dignity. And I said, yeah, it's about time somebody start complaining about school. She said, oh, no, you don't understand. You want to make it even more controlling. You want to take away everybody's humanity and all the rest of the stuff. I was like, what?

Let me read this thing. I was outraged. I was outraged by it. But I said, yeah, shouldn't be surprised. I went through the system. I knew what it was like. I knew it was about social control, but they just keep escalating it. And they keep doing it more and more overtly instead of covertly.

So the document discourages travel restrictions. They want you to still be able to travel because they want to be able to use the travel as a carrot so they can get you to get the vaccine passport, you see. So they want to keep this. The only thing that they want to allow, the only exceptions they want, let's keep the kids in school. Whatever we got to do, we got to keep the kids in school. And let's keep travel going as long as you've got the vaccine passport,

because that gives them the opportunity to usher in the kind of social credit control system that they have in China, as well as a global ID. So everything that they do, even the little measures where they halfway pull back, there's an alternative motive to it. These people are calculating beyond belief. The EU digital COVID certificate, says the document, has been a major success in providing the public with a tool that is accepted and trusted across the EU.

As of August 1, 2022, 75 countries and territories from across five continents are connected to the EU Digital certificate system. This makes the EU digital COVID certificate a global standard, brags the European Union Commission. And so a daily skeptic says, well, what this fails to mention, of course, is any rationale for the passes. What's the point of restricting the travel of the unvaccinated or those who are not sufficiently vaccinated when the vaccinated are no less likely to spread the disease? This key question is entirely unaddressed.

Well, because it was never about medicine. It was never about a disease. It was always about control and depopulation. It also encourages governments to counter misinformation. That's another part of it. So pulled into this whole pandemic thing, pulled into the fact that they want to put the WHO and a pandemic treaty at the center of all this,

make what the WHO run by a Marxist political hack who has absolutely no medical background whatsoever, Tedros. They want those people to be able to lock down countries at will, preemptively. Now, we think that there may be something coming, so we're going to lock you down. And as part of this, just in case you don't get the message as to how political and not medical or scientific this is.

They put in as a way to control any anti-Western and anti-EU narratives, such as being against the Ukraine war. We have to stop that misinformation as well. Here's what the document says. Address the political dimension of vaccine hesitancy and disinformation campaigns linked to anti-Western and anti-EU narratives. Particular challenges include channels, such as mine, where disinformation, as they characterize it, is circulating in relation to other crises, especially Russian military aggression against Ukraine.

Wow, there you go. We understand exactly what this is. The EU, they said in their document, is determined to be a driving force to a new legally binding international agreement on pandemic prevention. Prevention. They don't even try to make the case anymore that this is about a pandemic.

No, we're going to prevent it, and we're going to take everything from you and enslave you and lock you down in a prison-like situation to prevent it from ever happening. And we're going to prevent climate change from ever happening. Got no evidence that it is happening. We have nothing but 50 years of failed predictions, major failed predictions. But don't pay any attention to that. I mean, it's amazing to me, especially people my age who believe this stuff,

people who have been around since 1970, who have seen these people wringing their hands over the fact that everybody was going to be starving because we had too many people on earth. Everybody's going to be starving by the 1980s, that we're going to have a new ice age by the 1980s. And then by the end of the decade, they flipped that around and made it all about global warming. And then all the predictions about all the things that were going to disappear, the icebergs, the coral reefs, all the rest of the stuff. None of that phases. People my age.

I mean, I get it when kids are gaslighted with this stuff. They haven't been around long enough to know how con artists work. But somebody that has been through all this stuff, they ought to recognize the con when they see it. They ought to recognize to recognize the con when they see it. They ought to recognize the false prophecies when they see them. This was sent to me from Darren in Alberta. I said, check this out. This is the new premier of Alberta, Daniel Smith.

Here's what she has to say about what happened. In that, well, Alberta was known as a conservative province. Jason Kennedy had hung out as a conservative. He is now out largely because of what he did. He was the guy that was locking up pastors left and right. I hold that. We gave them a lump sum of money and said, run health care for us. And we were told, let the experts be in charge. They've got it all figured out.

They've developed integrated partnerships across the country with their public, the chief medical officers of health. They also have their own COVID scientific committees that were giving advice to government. And I think that, to be fair to Premier Kenney, he was a brand new government coming in, brand new leader. He'd been focused on federal issues for most of his career. He's brand new in health, and

they were already beginning to see that they had problems. He didn't know any better. But then 10 months since he was hit with a global pandemic, and he's looking for... Had Kenney ever read the charter? Yeah, with the global pandemic. And he's looking for... Had Kenny ever read the Canadian Charter of Rights? And these guys are all saying, we're the experts, we know what we're doing. And so he trusted them. I think that when the government fired...

He had one job. That was pretty clear that we needed new leadership and a change of direction. And I think that the fact that the premier lost his position shows that it was an error when vaccine exemptions or vaccine mandates came in. I think that the fact that the Premier lost his position shows that it was an error when vaccine exemptions or vaccine mandates came in. So I think that there has already been that. The ultimate accountability is the leader at the top who was ultimately responsible for making that decision is not there anymore. A couple of his close allies in making that decision, they're also taking a back seat. There are others who have been speaking openly about how they were fighting behind the scenes. And I appreciate

the fact that they did do that. But rank and file MLAs really didn't have a role in making these decisions. And that's one of the problems. That's one thing we're fixing is that we're changing our policymaking process so that MLAs know our direction of government right from the beginning and they get to tell us right from the beginning if we're going in the right direction rather than announcing the policy and then bringing them at the end so that's going to I think solve a lot of problems but I must tell you I I believe that Alberta Health Services is the source of a lot of the problems that we've had. They signed some kind of partnership with the World Economic Forum right in the middle of the pandemic. We've got to address that. Why in the world do we have anything to do with the

World Economic Forum? That's got to end. Well, that's good. I'm glad she's going to end that. And that has given a lot of people hope, as Darren said. He said, she's a breath of fresh air, after Jason Kenney. She may be the real deal because she called out one of our former premiers, Alison Redford, for going to Bilderberg. And in this video, she calls out the Alberta Health System, Health Services, rather, for signing on with the World Economic Forum.

Well, hopefully, again, as I said, you know, we need to support these people when they do the right thing. And, you know, same thing with DeSantis. But don't trust any of these people. And they take half measures, just like DeSantis does. When you hear, listen to what she's saying, she's trying to excuse Kenny and she's trying to excuse the conservative party. There is no excuse.

Look, you had one job, Kenny. Government is instituted. We have rights from God. They're God-given, and they're inalienable. That means you can't take them away, Jason. You can't take them away of some bureaucrat who says, well, I'm science, and I know all about it. This is the same excuse that Republicans make for Trump.

He didn't know. He was deceived. He relied on Fauci because he was science. No, you are a politician who has taken an oath to the Constitution or you took an oath to the charter of Canada. And as a result, you know what is legally allowed and you don't turn us into a medical martial law for any reason. So Kenny and Trump had one job, their job regarding,

you know, let these other people worry about the medical stuff and the recommendations and things like that. Their job is to protect our God-given rights, to decide what kind of medical treatment we're going to have, to decide in consultation with our doctors what we're going to do and what risks we're going to take. That's not government's decision. And you, as a temporary occupant of this office, your job, government's whole purpose, your one job is to protect our God-given rights. And they failed in terms of doing that. And there is no excusing that.

You can try to avoid it. And then look at the, we've had over 300,000 injuries and deaths from the normal vaccines. But then when you look at these other vaccines, this is put out by Justin Hart. And he went through the VAERS database and he pulled stuff up that was about kids who had had adverse effects from these vaccines. The first one that he has at the top here. Mommy, make it stop. 11-year-old female, five minutes post the first dose, said she couldn't hear, said she couldn't feel her ears. She lost consciousness and came to after two to five minutes. She had a seizure for five minutes and she screamed for mom to make it stop. Well, that's an 11 yearyear-old female. Here's a 5-year-old girl, Arizona,

four days after the dose, cardiac involvement. Started having fever right away, and then, you know, and again, fever was something that indicated that you're, you know, they would say, well, that's good. That shows that your body's having a good reaction to it. I mean, there was a nurse at the very beginning of this, as they were first giving it to medical people, and she had a fever that was like 105 i mean you know fever is that high can kill you as a nurse she knows that and she was talking about how high her fever was and

how it remained that way um a 10 year old girl uh 41 days post first dose of Pfizer, two days in the hospital, rushed to the hospital on January 11th and subsequently diagnosed with type one diabetes. Now, seven year old boy in Tennessee, 43 days post Pfizer complained of malign Malaysia and abdominal pain, headache in other words, myalgia, sorry. One five-year-old boy, 19 days after the first dose. Of course, this would be labeled as unvaccinated by the CDC's definition. He had multi-inflammatory syndrome. An eight-year-old boy, 33 days after the dose, thrombocytopenia, these horrific things that you see taken out of people's blood clots or whatever these things are that are growing inside people's veins. Now, a five-year-old girl one day post dose of the Pfizer seizure event, possibly longer than 15 minutes. Foaming at the mouth.

The mother found her slumped over in bed with foaming at the mouth with a high fever. Another one, seizure lasting two minutes. Second seizure six days later. EKG, abnormal, heart issues as well as seizures. That was a five-year-old girl. Seven-year-old boy, one day after the Pfizer dose. Emergency called in. Ambulance had a second witnessed tonic chronic seizure with eyes deviating six-year-old girl seven days after the pfizer two days in hospital seizure loss of consciousness five-year-old boy three days after uh fever increased 101 a dose of tolinol was given

about 10 minutes later he had a seizure lasting three and a half minutes. An ambulance was called. He was taken to the hospital. By the time he got there, fever was 102. Five-year-old boy, 10 hours after the dose. Seizure, gaze, palsy. Child was unresponsive for one to three minutes with eyes open and fixed, mouth open, arms and legs extended, muscles rigid and twitching. And you see that with three of these, right in a row, these young children. So I could go on and on. I mean, this is, I've just read a few of the ones in this Twitter thread, and he didn't put all of them in there. But the CDC is going to do that to kids because the vaccine companies

want their legal immunity. You know, Corminati and the Pfizer-BioNTech are legally distinct. Same thing with the Moderna and the trade name SpikeVax. So they get whatever they want. And it doesn't matter what happens to your kids or to you. And they will not repent of their murders because all they're about is money. These are the same people that ran the opioid epidemic, the FDA, the AMA, the doctors and nurses and the people in the hospital that kept prescribing opioids.

Why? Because they got taken out by the pharmaceutical companies and entertained. They had stripper parties and lots of vacations and cash. So, yeah, I'll prescribe this stuff for them. And the AMA was complicit in all that. The FDA was complicit in all that. If they will do that to people, if they'll get massive number of Americans addicted for this stuff, that's the dirty secret about our war on drugs, isn't it? Jill Biden is now, Dr. Jill, is now warning about a wave of cancer coming.

Now, this isn't because, as Ryan Cole pointed out in the spring of 2021, a pathologist, he looked at it and said, these people have been vaccinated. They have an unbelievably low killer T-cell count. He said, you're going to see massive numbers of cancers, and we did. We saw in the Defense Department's database, we saw them going up by every kind of cancer, going up by several hundred percent over the previous five-year average. Now, Jill Biden is putting out a cover story for that. She's saying you're going to see a lot of cancers coming up here because people haven't been doing their preventive screening.

That's how they're covering up for the fact that it's coming from the jab. Just like the stuff about long COVID. Oh, yeah, you know, I know it's long COVID. It's not the vaccine. All the rest of the stuff. So meanwhile, we have a vaccine maker in India, the Serum Institute of India, the world's largest vaccine producer, is destroying 100 million doses of this genetic

code injection because people don't want to take it. And it was an interesting comment from the CEO of this Indian company. He said, although the COVID-19 shots may be given along with the flu shots in the future, right, because that's the plan in America. It's like, oh, yeah, that was a plan from Fauci, remember, in October 2019? How do we get people to take their annual flu shot? This has been the vexation of Fauci and the CDC and all of these people for years, over a decade.

We've got to get people to take that annual flu shot. And they were scaring people using the same tactics they did with COVID. And then they said, well, how do we get people to do this? And how do we come up with something we don't have to wait 10 years for, right? And so it was always about the universal flu shot. Now, this Indian CEO of this vaccine company says, well, you know, in America, they'll wind up giving the COVID shot along with a flu shot every year. But he says in India, there is no culture of taking a flu shot every year, like in the West. Oh, how'd they survive? I just don't know why, why all the people in India

survived. As a matter of fact, you know, look at how many people they have and look at their reproduction rate. Maybe they haven't been sterilized by the pharmaceutical industry, you think? So with the vaccine hesitancy that is out there, especially for this COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has a solution. They're going to raise the price of the vaccine by 400%. So, you know, if your uptake drops off by a factor of four, you raise the price by a factor of four. Got to maintain that revenue because that's what this is all about. Greed, the love of money, the root of all evil. So they've been charging people $30 per dose for something that the government paid for the research, the government paid for the manufacturing,

the government distributed it for them even, and they got to keep all the profits. And so they're going to go from $30 per dose up to $110 to $130 per dose. In 2021, Pfizer made $37 billion through COVID vaccine sales alone. And they doubled their overall revenue. And they didn't even give a thank you to the father of the vaccine, Donald Trump. That's the thing that bothers him so much. They could at least thank him.

Well, there's no honor among thieves. There's no honor among the people who work for Satan. So don't expect that. Now, I have a correction to make. I had a listener from the Philippines as I was showing that video last Friday, I think it was. And I didn't get to the pharmaceutical stack yesterday, so I didn't get to this correction. There you had a situation where they believed, at least some law enforcement, some of the parents believed that their children died as a result of a vaccine,

Dengvaxia. And that is actually an older story. So that is not the COVID vaccine. So thank you, Judith, in the Philippines for bringing that to my attention. I want to correct that. That happened back in 2017, 2018, she said. And it was about a vaccine for dengue fever. That's why they called it dengue vax. So it was about that. That might have been a clue to me, but I missed that.

So anyway, she said it was sold. It was all about the dengue vaccine sold to the Philippines in 2016 by Sanofi, a French pharmaceutical company, if I remember right. At least many doctors and politicians were not bought off at that point in time. They pushed back against it. But she also talks about what is happening in the Philippines. And again, uh,

the department of health there is following the protocol of the U S following protocol of the EU. It looks like they're pulling out the worst of everything and it is all remaining. Just so what remains now are the policies that many employers that no jab, no job, uh, no jab,

no entry into the business establishments. If you're a customer, uh, no jabs, no face to face classroom or graduation appearance. And, um, if the parents fight back, testing is required for the jab free students. Masks are still required indoors. Some mayors and governors still want their cities to implement wearing a mask outside. You see, this is not going away. And this is a global issue. Nobody removed the color of law prevarications that they had to put this stuff in in the first place. And now they're going to the next step to say, we want to make the WHO the center of all this. The WHO can point

the finger at anybody and lock any country down. And you're not going to go anywhere unless you've got a global id that we'll call the vaccine passport uh it's not over by take your business international enterprise europe network is the world's largest network providing free support and advice to smes with global ambition with over 450 partner organizations worldwide we bring together unparalleled expertise to serve businesses like yours we can help you discover partners in new markets, advance your digitisation and gain valuable insights into EU funding opportunities. Take advantage of free expert advice and innovation resources. Visit een-ireland.com and take your business global today. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people

for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security,

Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. business whether it's communications or security innovate has you covered visit innovate today innovate the it solutions people long shot folks i'm afraid to say uh we'll be right back stay with us the common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.

And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com On Sunday, you had Joe Biden go on a program with MSNBC, Sunday talk show. He said a lot of interesting things. One of them, we're going to talk to Guy Rulford about yet another one of his gaffes about gun control. We'll get to that in a moment here. But he was asked point blank by this guy about his age and whether or not that was an issue. And he replied that he still has the passion and the stamina.

Have you noticed that? I haven't noticed that even though he said I could drop dead tomorrow. Well, that's not just because he's 79 years old and the oldest person to be a us president. Uh, you know, tomorrow is not promised to any of us. You know, that's one of the key things I would tell everybody, you know, just because, um, he's, he's old, Uh, yeah, the law of averages, uh, catches up with all of us here, but, um, uh, it's, it's not even really his age or his health

condition. Uh, it's his mental capacity and, uh, his wife should have mentioned that to him. Uh, Rush, uh, criticized her for that because even when he was a candidate it was pretty obvious that he had uh senility issues and he said um you know she she if she loved him she should take him out of this thing instead of humiliating him like that uh but um anyway i don't know when i saw that i could drop dead tomorrow. I, my first thought was, well, did he actually take the jab instead of a placebo? I what's what's going on. Uh, if you think about this in 2024,

he'll be 81 when he's running. Of course, Trump will be 78. Trump doesn't show the signs of, um, a mental decline that Biden does. He's just as nasty as he ever was. But,

uh, there's also released about Bideniden a 634 page report details about hunter's uh laptop and going through a in specific detail and they sent a copy of this report the 635 four page report they sent to every member of Congress, House and Senate and said, here's what you need to look at and here's what you can use to impeach Biden because it wasn't just about all the many crimes of Hunter, but it's also about the crimes of Joe Biden, just in case they're interested, which they probably are not.

So as he was explaining why age doesn't matter, Joe Biden says, everybody talks about the, you know, the new 70 is 50 and all that stuff. He got that backwards. Supposed to be the new 50 is 70. But in his case, it hit 70 at 50. I don't know. He says, I'm a great respecter of fate.

I could get a disease tomorrow. I could, you know, drop dead tomorrow. Well, you know, fate. As we'll see, he's not a respecter of God. He's a respecter of what he thinks is fate. You know, I don't know if this guy is listening or not, but there was a musician and I picked up on his song a couple of Christmases ago. I was still at Infowars. And he had an arrangement of Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas.

I always liked that song. What I didn't like about it was the line, If the Fates Allow. And this musician, he plays upright string bass. His name is Don. I can't remember his last name, so I can't find his song because he was very excited to see that I was playing it. And he contacted me and he said,

Yeah, you can play it anytime you want. It's because he he produced the record and all the rest of the stuff uh so he plays uh upright jazz bass and actually I saw him when I went up to Gerald Salenti's uh I spoke at um his Occupy Peace rally in the spring of 2021 and I saw Don there and I can't remember his last name and I can't find the, um, uh, the video. So Don, if you're out there listening, let me know. I'll play it again this year. Drive some traffic your way because he took, he changed that line, you know, have yourself

a merry little Christmas. Uh, if the Lord allows is what he did to change that. Well, it's a good musical arrangement and he fixed the glaring problem with that song so yeah um whether you are a christmas songwriter uh that was that came out of um meet me in st louis with judy garland that was where they premiered that song and um so um yeah it is um fate does not hold your fate uh god does biden he says in terms of my energy level in terms of how much i'm able to do i think people should just look at it and say does he still have the same passion for what he's doing does he even know what he's doing he can even find his way off the stage when he's finished reading the prepared script?

He went on to say, yeah, it's totally legitimate for people to have concerns about my age. It's not concerns about your age. I mean, it's concerns about your mental capacity. This is, again, on the program with Jonathan Capehart. And what this guy said to him. This is MSNBC. He said, my Aunt Gloria, who you may recall was your biggest fan in 2020, because she said that we need an old white dude to take on another old white dude. When I asked her if you should run for election still, she says she loves you,

but she said she's not sure that you should given your age. Her one caveat was that if Donald Trump runs again, you absolutely have to run. So let's say that Trump does not run again. Convince Aunt Gloria that she should stick with you. Biden says, well, I think Aunt Gloria should take a look. I think it's a legitimate thing to be concerned about anybody's age, including mine. That's totally legitimate.

But you think the best way to make judgment is to, you know, watch me. Am I slowing up? Yeah. I don't think so. I don't think he really made that case. So he also said in terms of he was asked about his wife again, the same interview, Jonathan Capehart. And, uh, as a zero hedge puts it, uh, his brain rebooted right in the middle of answering

the question. Uh, so he says, uh, does she support you running for reelection? And he just almost falls asleep. And then Cape heart says, Mr. President, are you there? He says, uh, old Dr. Biden thinks that, uh, my wife thinks that, uh, that I, uh, that, that we're, that we're doing something very important and that I shouldn't just walk away from it. So, yeah, he also in the interview said that Congress voted on his student loan debt bailout. He said, yeah, it passed.

I got it passed by a vote or two. No, he didn't. They didn't vote on it. It was an executive order. The only person who got to vote on it was him, theoretically. Maybe he didn't even read the executive order that his staff wrote. You think? Does he know that he signed it, even?

Did he sign it? Somebody else signed it for him. And then finally, I said, we're going to talk about the Second Amendment. He said he's going to push legislation that says that there can be no more than eight bullets in a round. So I guess this is coming from somebody who doesn't know what a woman is. I think he doesn't know what a round is either. Over the last 30 days, Breitbart has put together a collection of many of his gaffes, lies, and goofy statements.

He said that his son, Beau, who died of cancer, lost his life in Iraq. He said all this within the last month. He said, let me start off with two words, made in America. He also, when giving a web address, he read it off the teleprompter instead of saying this dot, you know, reportfraud.ftc.gov. He actually read it off of the teleprompter and spelled out dot instead of dot just see the people in the staff uh you know face plants with this stuff

anyway um and of course the the thing where he thought that um the deceased republican jackie walorski was at the event. Jackie, you here? Where's Jackie? I know she was going to be here. Helped make this a reality. She had passed away two months earlier. He thanked first responders and a congresswoman as he was speaking in Puerto Rico about the Hurricane Fiona. He said, I want to applaud the Red Cross volunteers who came from as far away as California, Louisiana, Minnesota, Texas

to help however they can. New York sent not only a congresswoman, one of the most congresswomen in the Congress, about the state troopers and emergency responders. He also claimed that his grandfather was an all-American football player. His grandfather was born in 1884. And so the Republican National Committee said, no, he would have had to have been an all-American football player around 1902.

I don't even know that they had all-American football players in 1902. I don't even know that they had, uh, all American football players in 1902. Um, so anyway, it, it goes on and on. He, he made improper comments about, um, his, uh, son Hunter, which he, uh, should not be commenting on creates, uh, some legal jeopardy for him, but nevertheless, if we look at his interview that he had with a guy who is a transgender influencer on TikTok, this guy has shared his journey of cross-dressing and mutilation with the public and become a celebrity about it. And so this transgender activist, Dylan Mulvaney, got an interview with Biden as well.

And this is what transpired. Do you think states should have a right to gender-affirming health care? I don't think any state or anybody should have the right to do that. That's a moral question and it's a legal question. I just think it's wrong. Yeah, it's a moral question and as a legal question. I just think it's wrong. Yeah, it's a moral question and a legal question. Do you think states should have a right to ban this? Okay, well, first of all, let's understand.

I don't expect them to get this right, but institutions don't have rights. Governments don't have rights. You know, all this stuff about states' rights and everything, that's an improper way to think of this. States don't have rights. Governments don't have rights. Corporations don't have rights.

All of those are human institutions created by people. If anything, they've got privileges that have been given to them by the people who created them. Our government has certain privileges that were given to it by the states that created it and we the people who created them. Our government has certain privileges that were given to it by the states that created it, and we the people. That is the 9th and 10th Amendment, we point out, that they're not to presume that they have anything, any privileges that we haven't given them. But of course, people like Biden want to turn it exactly upside down, inside out, and say that we don't have any rights. We only have privileges that he and the institutions allow us to have. That's not right at all. So human beings have rights because we're created in the image of God, as the Declaration

of Independence points out. The government's responsibility is to protect those rights, but the government does not have rights. So that along with this deceptive catchphrase, affirming health care, gender-affirming health care. It's not health care. It's mutilation. And if adults want to mutilate themselves, that's a different story. It's reprehensible when you have surgeons do that type of thing.

If anybody ought to lose their license, those people ought to. But it is their decision to make as an adult, but it is not a decision that children can make. They want to pretend that children have rights. They don't. They don't have rights. Look at all the different things that we deny to them. How many things do we ban for minors?

A whole long list. Why? Because they don't have the maturity to decide that. And so Biden, Mulvaney opened it by saying, Mr. President, this is my 221st day of publicly transitioning. And Biden responds, God love you. Well, God may love him, but God condemns what he is doing and is not going to bless it. Biden said repeatedly that transgenderism is a moral good and that people need to be exposed to it in order to learn how wonderful it is. Well, God has something to say about people who call good evil and call evil good. bring together unparalleled expertise to serve businesses like yours. We can help you discover partners in new markets, advance your digitization and gain valuable insights into EU funding opportunities. Take advantage of free expert advice and innovation resources. Visit een-ireland.com and take your business global today. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across

Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. Biden couldn't find the time to meet with the families of those killed in Waukesha, as Information Liberation points out. But he does have the time to invite transgender lunatics to the White House to shill child sex changes, because that's what we're talking about.

Did you hear them talking about, well, children should be able to do this? No, they don't say that at all. They pretend this isn't about the children, but it is about the children. That's the only thing that they're stopping. And the only thing they're really stopping is the very, very young children. Even Republican governors are going to allow it for older minors, but they're still minors and they still don't have the judgment to make these life-altering permanent decisions. Child genital mutilation is a moral good, a best practice, and something that God loves,

but Americans wanting to preserve their heritage is evil. That's exactly the position of Biden. You know, we talk about, oh, no, I think we just ought to ask these people, should we allow children to drink? If they identify as an alcoholic, should they be allowed to drink? Because, you know, you can take a drink and it doesn't permanently alter your life. But these puberty blockers and the surgery and the rest of the stuff, that does permanently alter their lives.

We don't allow the kids to have a cigarette or to have alcohol. We don't allow the parents to give that to them either. And why is that? Because, again, those are not going to permanently alter them unless they did it repeatedly. Biden says Republicans are immoral for blocking this. So, again, this person documented themselves. And the problem I have with this is on Breitbart when they report this. Breitbart describes this guy, Dylan Mulvaney,

as a transgender TikTok star who documented his transition into a woman on social media. Hey, Breitbart, do you know what a woman is? This guy is not a woman. Stop playing their game. Come on. I mean, he did not transition into a woman. So Biden says it's outrageous and I think it's immoral.

The trans part is not immoral. But what they're trying to do to trans persons is immoral. They're children. They're children. Biden again called for every transgender person to have the right to use your gender identity bathrooms in public. Public leaders, he said, should seek out opportunities to be seen in public with transgender people, like he's doing. He said people change their minds. People just don't know enough to know, he said.

And so he's urging the parents of children wanting to transition. He doesn't say that. He doesn't say children, doesn't use that. He says, these are blood of your blood, bone of your bone. Don't be afraid. Well, he should be very afraid of what is happening to them. But let's get to the crimes that have been the first crime, which is obvious to everybody is what he's doing to our economy,

to our fuel, to impoverish us, to enslave us. And the same way that Trump's lockdowns enslaved us, impoverished us. Now you have heating oil being rationed in Joe Biden's America. That's the headline from Breitbart. It's only October, and the mostly Democrat-run American Northeast, heating oil is already being rationed, rationed in America. We have natural resources so vast in this country, enough to power America for hundreds of years,

and we're not only rationing oil, we're importing oil. And the only reason this is happening is because the Democrats want it to happen. He's exactly right. If the rationing is not bad enough, he said, look at the average wholesale cost of heating oil. It's gone up from $2.46 a year ago to $4.09. That's a 66% increase. All because Biden and extremist Democrats and fake media want you to believe that climate change is real. When the truth is, it's a lie.

It's a hoax. so he points out that this association of family-owned retailers in the state are talking about how they have to ration their customers and it's also going to be rationing their income i mean the price may have gone up by 66 percent that's their cost and of course they're going to pass that along to the other people but they're not going to have as much stuff to sell them so they're not going to be any better off they're going to pass that along to the other people, but they're not going to have as much stuff to sell them. So they're not going to be any better off. They're going to be worse off because it's a shortage, and that's one of the reasons why the price is skyrocketing. Nolte at Breitbart says Democrats are refusing by choice not to deliver basic things. In California, in Jackson, Mississippi, Democrats can't get water to residents. The Northeast can't get heating oil.

The whole country can't get enough baby formula. Democrats won't deliver enough energy, food, and water in America. And again, it's not their responsibility to deliver it. They've imposed themselves in the process, and that's why it's not happening. The free market can deliver. We can deliver pencils. We can deliver all kinds of things without central planning. Once the central planners get involved, even if they mean well, they don't have sufficient information. Even if they are the smartest people in the room, they don't have sufficient information to make an intelligent decision. But these people aren't the smartest people in the room.

And they are not looking out for our best interest either. They're corrupt imbeciles who are willing to burn down our society. So as he points out, instead he's sitting there, he's not doing anything to fix any of this stuff. Instead he's sitting there with a cross-dresser, lobbying for the right of children, children, to permanently mutilate themselves with sex change operations and calling it health care. So let's talk about his other crimes, the ones that you can find listed on his

son's laptop, his drug addict son's laptop. According to, this is exclusively put out last night by Daily Mail. I imagine a lot of people are going to be picking this up because this is a 634-page report that was sent out to every member of Congress, House, and Senate. It's being put together by a nonprofit that's called Marco Polo. It details accusations of 459 crimes allegedly committed by Hunter, including prostitution, distribution and possession of drugs, defrauding government agencies, illegal foreign lobbying and money laundering. And it includes six crimes by Joe Biden himself.

The founder is somebody who was a White House aide to Trump, so it has a political agenda to it, but of course, so does the cover-up of all this information. Have a massive political agenda to it. Uh, so, um, anyway, um, it, um, the types of white collar crimes that Biden is accused of in this are violating, uh, the, uh, restrictions about foreign lobbying and that type of thing, as well as some income tax lobbying issues. For example, one May 2016 email highlighted in the report, he has a senior advisor to Biden when he was then vice president, sent Joe a schedule for his call with then Ukrainian president Poroshenko, and he copied Hunter in the message. At the time, Hunter was on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma.

So Marco Polo, the organization that is releasing this, claims that by copying Hunter and the VP's schedule, that constitutes a use of non-public information from a government job for financial gain, which allegedly violates Section 2635 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. And he also used it sending an alias email address that he used. Biden used an email called Robert Peters. Do you remember in the Obama administration how Lisa Jackson, who was the head of the EPA, remember how she was fired because she was using an alias email to get around detection? Well, Biden was doing the same thing.

The report also claims that Joe illegally utilized his private alias email address under another pseudonym, Robin Ware, in a 2012 conversation with now Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, who was then National Security Advisor to the Vice President. So he's got multiple email aliases. Again, that was something that you had an EPA administrator fired for. So the 638, 34-page report claims to have identified 140 business-related crimes by Hunter, 191 sex-related crimes, and 128 drug-related crimes, and six white-coll collar crimes by Joe Biden. Um, some of them relating to documents that were improperly handled.

Is that maybe why they went to Mar-a-Lago in order to preemptively put this stuff out and say, well, this is just retaliation for what we did to cover up. Well, we'll take a look at that when we come back, we're going to, uh, actually we're not going to take a look at that when we come back we're going to uh actually we're not going to take a look at that when we come back um when we come back we're going to get into what is happening with the new world order so stay with us we'll be right back and at the top of the hour we'll be having an interview with a lawyer who specializes a very good lawyer take your business international enterprise europe network is the world's largest network providing free support and advice to smes with global ambitions. With

over 450 partner organisations worldwide, we bring together unparalleled expertise to serve businesses like yours. We can help you discover partners in new markets, advance your digitisation and gain valuable insights into EU funding opportunities. Take advantage of free expert advice and innovation resources. Visit een-ireland.com and take your business global today. Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment

so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. In terms of Second Amendment protection. So stay with us. We'll be right back. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. There's been a lot of discussion about this city that Mohammed bin Salman, the clown prince of Saudi Arabia,

wants to build in the desert. And to give you an idea of what this is about, and this is probably the best example of the smart city dystopia that these people want to do, I want to play for you his promotional video about this city called The Line. And pay particular attention to how controlling it is and how, as many listeners have pointed out, I know, by the way, is RockFan comments still down there? Yeah, that's not, I mean, we had technical problems

at the beginning of the show, but that doesn't have anything to do with us. So that's something else that's happened. We've been hit with multiple things today. So RockFan comment line is not working, I think. But anyway, let me play for you you we've had a lot of people comment about this and say this looks like uh they're putting this giant high-tech prison out in the middle of the desert very much like what you've seen out of so many science fiction

dystopian things like you know here's here's a city but you're not going to get out um okay so i'm told that it's down for everybody who refreshed the page since we started having problems. So something happened with that. But here is the line. Take a look at it and see if you think it's utopian, like they say, or if it is dystopia. For too long, humanity has existed within dysfunctional and polluted cities that ignore nature.

Oh yeah, this thing's not. A revolution in civilization is taking place. Here's a big city. Imagine a traditional city and consolidating its footprint. Sucks in all the things around it. And enhance nature. The line will be home to 9 million residents and will be built with a footprint of just 34 square kilometers. Packing everybody in. To provide a a healthier more sustainable quality of life this is what agenda 21 was always about are organized in three dimensions

residents have access to all their daily needs within five-minute walk neighborhoods and the lines infrastructure makes it possible to travel end-to-end in 20 minutes with no need for cars, resulting in zero carbon emissions. By leveraging AI technology, services are autonomous, saving you time and effort. Designed by world-leading architects, the line is 500 meters tall, 200 meters wide, 170 kilometers long, and housed within an elegant mirror glass facade. Intelligent solutions create efficiency and year-round temperate microclimate with natural ventilation. Energy and water supplies are 100% renewable. The line is designed as a series of What happens when they go out?

Everybody start calling each other? Yeah, everybody's going to have a window, right? Six hours at the heart of the globe's key trade routes, a place for commerce and communities to thrive like nothing on earth seen before. The line, the city that delivers new wonders for the world. And you kind of wonder what they're thinking. Anybody who's looked at this, and of course we know what they're thinking, because we've seen this type of thing pushed by the UN, even when they called it UN Agenda 21. Sometime in the 21st century, we're going to do it.

Then in 2015, they said it'll be by 2030 that we're going to do this type of thing. That's what all of the smart cities aspire to be. He's just done it on a grander scale and he's done the computer automation to show you what this looks like. Sucking in everything that is, you know, uh, all these people who love cities and hate transportation. They always talk about urban sprawl. Oh, we need to concentrate everybody in the cities and we need to take away their ability to move. Oh, you'll be able to transverse it from one side to the other in 20 minutes.

But what if you want to go somewhere in the middle? Oh, forget about that. Yeah, that's going to be a much longer thing. And do it on their time as well. They're going to make it three-dimensional, they pointed out, which, of course, if we all understand that that's really what's causing cities as well as places that are not cities like, you know, not concentrated high rise cities like Austin.

Austin is failing because they continue to pack people in there. And this is not just Austin. It's all these different places. They continue to pack people into the metropolitan area without expanding the roads because you can't pack people in in three dimensions. You can't have cities that grow three-dimensionally with skyscrapers and all the rest of this stuff, and neighborhoods that get more and more dense and compact

without increasing the transportation. All of the sci-fi depictions of major cities that you saw, even going back into the early 20th century in the earliest films, things like Metropolis, you would see three-dimensional transportation, just like you would have three-dimensional cities. Musk understands that. That's what he's talking about, the boring project, going down into tunnels.

If you're going to grow your cities in three dimensions, you have to grow your transportation. But they have really no interest in doing that. But if you want to know how they're going to pack everybody into the cities and ban everybody from being anywhere else, here's an example that's already happening. They haven't even started building this dystopian nightmare yet. But over a million Saudi citizens are forcibly displaced in Jeddah to make way for an extravagant project there.

They become victims of forced displacement. Old neighborhoods are being demolished in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, to make way for luxury hotels and entertainment venues, according to human rights groups. In December of last year, 2021, the Saudi Public Investment Fund, chaired by the clown prince MBS, announced the launch of a development project called Jetta Central. It'll have a museum, an opera house, a stadium, an aquarium, hotels, new residential neighborhoods.

These people are like Nero. They're going to burn down what you've got so they can do their renewal project. I mean, the whole Great Reset is essentially like Emperor Nero, going to burn everything down and then build their Great Reset of Rome. That's what he did. He blamed it on the Christians. France 24 reported that Saudi authorities have carried out demolitions in some 60 different neighborhoods,

mostly located in the southern part of the city. Three tribesmen were detained in 2020 for speaking out against the eviction of their tribe from the area. This has always been the plan for the UN Agenda, Agenda 21. It is exactly what they planned with the UN 2030 Agenda. If you go back and look at the old maps of Agenda 21, they show giant megacities and the rest of the country empty. That's exactly what he's trying to do here. Germany could witness a cash renaissance because the economy there is

deteriorating with inflation. This is a big deal for the Germans because they still have a memory of the Weimar Republic. They understand that that kind of hyperinflation was responsible for the Nazis gaining power. So since World War II, they have been very, very concerned about any kind of inflation. And now they have the highest inflation that the German people have seen since 1949. Producer prices have increased by a record 45.8%. Energy prices are up by 132% in Germany. They're up by 66% in the Northeast here, the heating oil bills are. August and September recorded the highest increase in producer prices

since they did any of these surveys in 1949. Economics, says this author, Zero Hedge. Economics is not mathematics. Economics is mainly about psychology. That is really true. That is especially true when you're talking about the modern monetary theory. There's no mathematics involved in that whatsoever, not even basic arithmetic.

It's all about psychology, and it's all about nudging people. At this moment, inflation has several dimensions in Germany. In the first place, the Germans are becoming alarmed and irritated, although they're not yet venting such emotions via mass riots. But they were building up to it. Just as that pipeline blew up, there was a tremendous amount of pressure being applied. And you see the ruling party in Germany is rapidly losing ground to the alternative for Deutschland, AfD. And they were having massive demonstrations uh, demonstrations saying, turn on the

pipeline because you had, uh, two pipelines or you had Nord Stream one and Nord Stream two, uh, Nord Stream one was shut down, uh, essentially by the Russians because they said we're doing, um, maintenance on it. And we've got a turbine that's being maintained in Canada and they won't bring the pipeline, the turbine back so we can put it in there. But everybody suspected that it was pressure being applied to them by Putin. That was probably the basis of that. But for Nord Stream 2, it was filled up with gas, ready to go,

and the German government would not allow that to be turned on. So whether it was maintenance or whether it was Putin, Nord Stream 1 was down. Nord Stream 2 was simply political. You couldn't say it was anything other than that, and it was maintenance or whether it was Putin, Nord Stream 1 was down. Nord Stream 2 was simply political. You couldn't say it was anything other than that. And it was on the German side. And so their popularity was plummeting. They were having massive demonstrations to open it up. And then, voila, the problem goes away because the pipelines are blown up.

So, yeah, it is building. Secondly, it is politically very tricky to call a spade a spade. Given the German sensitivities on the mentioned topics, it is simply not politically appropriate to say that inflation is caused by the monetization of European sovereign debt, which is what Milton Friedman would explain to them. Inflation is always a problem of printing out too much money. No, no, no, let's not say that. Let's only talk about the energy situation. Well, that also is the government's responsibility.

They made that pretty clear, shutting the thing off and joining the sanctions against Russia. Thirdly, people are increasingly fleeing inflation by going into real assets. And this is the important part. They can no longer run to mortgages due to rapidly rising interest rates. Although gold is in great demand in Europe, having a choice between gold and gold is not enough for some people. So the demand for such things as historical weapons or aged alcohol or Swiss watches is growing. People are looking for physical things that they can put their money into.

Exports of Swiss watches rose by 19%, could be a record this year. But they finished by saying a time is coming when people increasingly use cash instead of bank accounts and that they will pour their cash into durable goods. Well, I think better than a Swiss watch is something like gold. Gold is still gold. And, you know, it's always going to be in demand. Things get really tough.

It may be difficult to sell your Swiss watch to somebody, but you can always negotiate gold with them. Again, Tony has set up, graciously set up davidknight.gold. That'll take you to Tony Arterburn's wisewolf.gold and let him know that I sent you. But he has gold, silver. If you want to put it into something physical and tangible, that is real money that you can physically hold.

That's an important thing to think about. You know, I talked earlier about Danielle Smith, uh, the new Alberta premier after that interview that she did that I played for you. Uh, part of it,

she did that with, um, um, that was with a Western, um, let's see Western standard. I think is the name of the, um, well, Western standard is the name of the news outlet. Uh, she had a subsequent interview where she said, um, started talking about generating

pardons for people who were convicted, found guilty of crimes that are not crimes and to push back against the vaccine passport. That's why I say, even though she's trying to give a pass to Jason Kennedy and some of these other things, again, uh, you know, there might be, uh, as long as she does the right things, support her with that. You know, she may have, um, uh, some issues where she's concerned about making too many political enemies. She's going to be ruffling a lot of feathers if she just pushes back against the UN Davos agenda. So maybe she doesn't want to pick up too many enemies at one time.

But she had some interesting comments about it. She said, we are human beings. We are not QR codes. And she said, you want to purge this QR database that was tracking people that was set up for the vaccine passports. So that's all very positive, I think. And she's absolutely right about that. She went on again to mention the fact that the Alberta Health Services had some kind of a partnership with the World Economic Forum right in the middle of the pandemic. She said, again, we've got to address that. Why in the world do we have anything to do with the World Economic Forum? That's got to end. She said, the things that

come to top of mind for me are people who got arrested as pastors and people given fines for not wearing masks. These are not things that are normal to get fines and to get prosecuted for. I'm going to look into the range of outstanding fines and get some legal advice on which ones we're able to cancel and provide amnesty for. And she says she promises to amend the Human Rights Act to ban discrimination based on COVID vaccination status. Now, the key is, is that just as Brian Shulhavi was talking about a vaccine impact, he says, you notice that they're very careful to only make this about the COVID vaccine. They still want the other vaccines, all the other stuff out there. And when you talk about kids being able to get into school, you understand there still is kind of a vaccine passport in order to get into school.

And she made this point very clear herself. She said the amendment would focus on COVID vaccines, she said, because the issue is not medical, it is political. Yes, absolutely right. And then she says, since it was a very specific reaction to a very specific vaccine mandate, we are going to be very precise about what we write in the legislation. In other words, she's signaling this is going to be narrowly focused

to the COVID vaccine. When in reality, what we truly need is something that broadly supports general principles of freedom and liberty. That's really what is needed. Instead, they're going to make this very narrow about the COVID vaccine. In the same way that when Rand Paul talks about, he makes it all about Fauci. If he thinks that there was something created with gain of function, he's not going to even follow that to the logical conclusion.

He's not even going to call for shutting down all gain of function. No, this is simply about Fauci. And the problem is not going to go away. It is very much broader than that. But anyway, she says, we've got to get back to an attitude of you take a vaccine to protect yourself. But we have to get away from this attitude that you demonize those who make a different choice.

Well, it's better, but it's not sufficient. It's much better, but it's not sufficient. She said most of those managing the Alberta health system today are holdovers from the NDP years, the other political party. They've had their chance to fix this bloated system, and they've largely failed on almost all accounts. Failure is no longer an option.

They didn't fail. They did precisely what they intended to do. When we have kids who can't read and write in schools, they didn't fail. The schools didn't fail. The schools are teaching them what they want to teach them. They're teaching them to be hateful, racist, Marxist, transgenders. They are teaching them the LGBT agenda, and they're teaching them Marxism and hatred. They're not failing. They're doing very good at that, in case you haven't noticed. They don't have any intention of getting them to read. They don't want them to learn critical thinking.

They don't want them to have the tools of learning. They want them to be thoroughly inculcated with their values and their way of seeing the world and trusting them in all things, doing everything they're told. And so the health system was not a fail. What happened during this pandemic lockdown was not a failure. It was a plan, a plan that was practiced for decades. And not just in the United States.

It was practiced internationally, as I pointed out a couple of days ago. She failed to address the comments that she made during a virtual interview with Western Standard about the World Economic Forum. During the interview, she said she would end the AHS data sharing deal with other health providers, including the Mayo Clinic, under a program overseen by the World Economic Forum. But this is all about creating a global ID. This is all about identifying us as inventory, turning us into the Internet of Things. And you can see it even in Pakistan. I've talked about India and how Bill Gates has been actively involved there with the Aadhaar system

and how they use the welfare and medical care for the poor people of India, they use that as a carrot to get them to accept the Aadhaar biometric identification system. And they're doing the same thing now in neighboring Pakistan. Pakistan has had massive floods. You had people who were living in little tents and shacks that were swept away by the rains. And they're desperate for help. And the government of Pakistan is going to make

getting a biometric verification and that kind of an ID project, they're going to make that the key for them getting any help. These people who have lost their homes are starving in the banks of this flooded area. And in order to get any aid, they're going to have to enter the biometric surveillance identification grid. And these people don't understand what's happening to them, right? They don't understand the implications of this. I mean, Americans don't understand,

many of them, the implications of getting this global ID. And we've got a lot of conservatives getting upset over the uncontrolled border saying, well, we need to have an ID that everybody needs to have this ID and you need to get approval from Washington before you have a job. It's like, do you understand the implications of that? They don't understand the implications. So these people who've been living in tents on the bank of the river and they got washed away, they don't understand the implications of this biometric verification thing that they're about to get into. And this is the way they have succeeded, by playing on our ignorance.

There's an interesting article on Zero Hedge from Peak Prosperity, how the elites use your ignorance and their arrogance against you. Because Americans and Europeans are just as ignorant about most of this stuff as these Pakistanis who are living in tents. Insistence on the idea that we can readily transition into clean energy, well, is that really going to work? As Peak Prosperity points out, all you have to do is just do a quick calculation and say, okay, look at the minerals and the materials that are needed to make the batteries,

to make the solar panels, to make the windmills or whatever. Look at the known reserves of those things, and then look at what we would have to have for everybody to have a battery-operated electric car. There isn't enough known reserve of that. We do have enough reserves to last us for over 600 years of coal. We know that. Well, we can't have that. That's going to be off-limits.

So we're not going to be allowed to have that. So the things that are plentiful are going to be shut down and denied to us because, you know, nitrogen is horrific, even though it's the thing that you find most of in the atmosphere. CO2, which is necessary for plants to survive, and the plants are necessary for us to survive, that's got to be eliminated. So you've got to eliminate CO2. You've got to eliminate nitrogen. You've got to eliminate coal.

But we're going to survive on the things that don't exist in sufficient quantity. That is what they're trying to sell us, and they're playing on our ignorance. He makes a comparison to complex systems. He says complex systems are what govern our world and what define our reality, and they share a couple of important features. Number one, they're inherently unpredictable. Number two, they owe their order and complexity to the flow of energy. Our economy is a complex system.

Take its energy away and it will extremely rapidly simplify and become a lot less dynamic, a lot less complex, and a lot less interesting. Your body is also a complex system. If you starve it for food, you too will quite rapidly become a lot less interesting and dynamic, and eventually you'll become dead. You'll also lose your energy. You know, he doesn't take this analogy any further than that, but I think it is a good analogy. As they starve our society, it is having the same effect as if they were to starve us individually.

Because as you are being starved, it takes away your personal energy. Eventually, it takes away your hope. It takes away your initiative. That's what they're doing to us as a society as well. They're starving us of liberty. They're starving us of capital. They're starving us of our human capital,

our desire and our ability to take risks, our desire and our ability to be able to create things freely. These things are prohibited to us on an increasing basis. This web of prohibition is rapidly extending to every aspect of us personally and to our society. And we have to understand what the purpose of this is. I mean, they're trying to starve us to shut us down. We did get somebody that got through on Rockfin.

Thank you, Art. Take your business international. Enterprise Europe Network is the world's largest network providing free support and advice to SMEs with global ambitions. With over 450 partner organisations worldwide, we bring together unparalleled expertise to serve businesses like yours. We can help you discover partners in new markets, advance your digitisation and gain valuable insights into EU funding opportunities. Take advantage of free expert advice and innovation resources. Visit een-ireland.com and take your business global today.

Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment So you can focus on what really matters growing your business whether it's communications or security Innovate has you covered visit innovate today Innovate the IT solutions people. Oh, thank you. Appreciate that very much for the tip We're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back

Stay with it going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Now stay with us. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show right and uh we are connected to our guests we're still having some audio issues on on his side. And so while we're waiting to get him on, I want to go back to what has just happened in the UK. You know, we're seeing tremendous amount of volatility everywhere, aren't we? This kind of political instability is something that is not uncommon for some countries like Italy, but it is very uncommon for the UK. And at the heart of it is this Great Reset. And at the heart of the Great Reset is the climate issue. And there's nobody who is pushing that any harder than this guy who has now become the new prime minister there. It was a very close race between him and Liz Truss.

She was able to pull it out. And then the people in her administration and other conservatives ran her out in record time. This guy, I played this clip for you yesterday, but I want you to hear this again. This is Rishi Sunak. His father-in-law, by the way, is a billionaire. And he is a listed partner of Davos. So let me play this for you, and then we're going to make a quick comment about that, and we now have our guest online, so we're going to go right to him in just a second.

Announcing three new steps today. First, we're announcing the UK's intention to mandate climate disclosures by large companies and financial services firms across the economy by 2025. Going further than recommended by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, the first G20 country to do so. Hey Guy, can you hear me? We're implementing a new green taxonomy, robustly classifying what we mean by green to help firms and investors better understand the impact of their investments on the environment. And third, to meet growing investor demand for projects that can achieve environmental

and climate goals in the UK, next year we will issue our first ever sovereign green bond, the first in a green curve of new issuances. All right. And I wanted to play that as a lead-in to our guest, because he is very well aware of how they're using financial choke points to come after the Second Amendment. This guy is going to use ESG financial choke points, and he's bragging about that in so many different areas. He's all about money, right? His father-in-law, very rich. He has more wealth, as they're saying, than the royal family does,

this new prime minister. And so he's all about the money. And so he's going to come after the people in the UK using financial controls and prohibitions and carrots and sticks. That's what the ESG is about. And you just heard him bragging about that. He wants zero energy in the UK. And they're getting pretty close to achieving that.

So we're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we'll be talking to a guy, Relford, who is a lawyer out of Indiana. He is one of only two persons to receive an award from the National Rifle Association for Distinguished Advocate. So stay with us. We will be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, and joining us now is Guy Relford with the law offices of Guy Relford in Carmel, Indiana. And he also has a local radio show there.

And one of his most recent shows, he was talking about the new moves by, and this is actually being driven out of New York, I believe, Guy, where they have demanded these codes so that he can see what people are buying, that they're buying from gun shops and essentially track any kind of ammunition or gun purchases. But this is part of a bigger agenda to try to identify anything that they want to control. And of course, controlling speech and controlling guns is right there at the top of this. So joining us now is Guy Relford.

Thank you so much for joining us. It's my pleasure, David. It's a pleasure to be here. Well, thank you. Yeah, let's talk a little bit about that. What have you seen in terms of these kind of financial controls? Because that's one aspect of it. And it was the first one that was done back under the Obama administration.

They started talking about operation choke point, where they're going to shut down the ability to access things financially. I've been shut down from PayPal because I talk about the vaccines and I talk about other things that they don't like me to talk about, uh, like gun freedom. So, you know, this kind of financial control is now spreading and metastasizing in a very real way, isn't it? Well, it really is. And as you mentioned, Operation Chokepoint was a very we haven't been able to do in the legislatures,

which is to eradicate Second Amendment rights in America. I mean, that's what they're clearly attempting to do. And they don't apologize for that. And they're very specific about it. But it's really started with going to financial institutions, as you mentioned, David, and saying, you know, you just shouldn't do business with any business that's associated with selling guns or even get this. I'm also, in addition to being an attorney, I'm a certified firearms instructor and I own a firearms training business.

I wrote Gun Safety for Dummies several years ago. I've had credit card companies and financial institutions say they will not process payments for my students to come take gun safety classes consider that people who just want to be safe and responsible and law-abiding citizens i i teach a class on on gun laws so that people can stay on the right side of the law if they're going to be gun owners and there are financial institutions out there that will not do business with me just as you mentioned paypal not wanting to do business with you. I was turned down. There was a credit card processing company called Square.

And they said, oh, no, you teach gun classes? We want nothing to do with your business. I've had fellow instructors. One is a police officer with no criminal history whatsoever. He got a letter in the mail, a certified letter in the mail from his bank enclosing two certified checks saying we've shut down your accounts your business account your personal account here are certified checks for the balances in each of those two accounts we no longer choose to do business with you and he was completely baffled he thought perhaps his identity had been stolen or something and he he called them eventually he got to the bottom of it which is the financial institution just chooses

not to do business with him as a firearms instructor. So that's where it started. But now they've gotten even more specific by going to the International Association that deals with credit card processing and these credit card codes. And they've taught them, that organization, into creating a new credit card code that the credit card company will see anytime anybody uses a credit card for any purchase. This could be to buy a t-shirt, a box of ammo, whatever it might be, a training class. But if they use that credit card or debit card in a gun store, that credit card company is now notified. And you have to wonder what is the purpose of that? And I've got some definite theories on that. Well, I do too. And I think that's why, you know, when you look at the Second Amendment and you look at the First Amendment, those are the canaries in the coal mine.

And we know that what they want to do is control everything that we do. They want to use the financial system as a way to track everything that we do with the central bank digital currencies to give us all a de facto global ID, but to also prohibit what kind of food we eat and how much we travel and what our lifestyle is. It's going to extend out to all these things. Right now, they're focusing just on free speech and on the Second Amendment. And that's one of the reasons why I talk so much about the Second Amendment is because these two areas are perceived by them to be a threat to their power, the First Amendment and the Second Amendment. And so they focus on them first and foremost,

and they try to get everybody scared of these things, saying speech is dangerous and firearms are dangerous and all the rest of this stuff, so they can justify coming after them. But once they come after them, they're going to go for everything else, and they've already made it clear. They're moving their agenda so quickly that it makes it easier for us. We don't have to, you know, there isn't a question that we are theorizing about a conspiracy. The conspiracy is in plain sight. And we know exactly where they've laid out their roadmap and publicly talked about it. So we know exactly where this is headed, don't we?

You're exactly right. They're not subtle about it. So we know exactly where this is headed, don't we? You're exactly right. They're not subtle about it. You know, as my grandfather used to say, it doesn't take a gypsy to read those tea leaves. And we see what's going on. On this credit card coding business, a lot of people have come out and they said, well, this is a backdoor way of creating a new database or registry of gun owners. So they're going to put you into this database and track your purchases. I think that could very well be an intent of the system. But the breakdown on that is that the credit card company isn't told what you bought.

They've just told an amount and that you used your credit card at a gun store. And so a database of guns, it doesn't really come out of this. They said, well, we need to track suspicious purchases. What's a suspicious purchase? If I go in and buy a new, very nice, expensive rifle, and I spend $3,000 on my rifle at a gun store, great. The credit card company is told I spent $3,000 at a particular gun store. But they don't know whether that's $3,000 of $20 boxes of ammo or $3,000 in t-shirts or $3,000 of what.

Yeah. So, so the, the, the justification for it in terms of tracking suspicious purchases, so as to cut down on mass shootings, that's a ostensible reason behind this makes no sense because how do you identify what's suspicious when all you see is a dollar amount and the fact that it was made at a gun store? I really think, David, and that's why I think you were wise to mention Operation Chokepoint at the very beginning of this discussion. I think it goes right back to trying to put gun-related businesses out of business. Because at the end of the day, if that credit card company sees, oh, look, here's a purchase from a gun store,

what do they have the option of doing? Decline. That's right. Just decline. Yeah. They want to end private ownership of guns, just like they want to end private ownership of cars. But, you know, right now they're saying, well, the guns are dangerous. We've got to get rid of them because of blah, blah, you know, whatever reason. But once that, what they're doing is they're also setting up this, this control mechanism.

And if they can come in and say, well, we saw that somebody was, they want to be able to control what you buy, how much of it you buy, who you buy it from, and that type of thing. So if they can set up this control mechanism and say, yeah, but we're just doing this because guns are dangerous, then as soon as they've got that up and working, one day you're going to wake up and find out that they're tracking the meat that you buy.

And, you know, that is going to be up and find out that they're tracking the meat that you buy. And that is going to be extendable to every aspect of your life. And they're already talking about how they want to do that. So when we look at this, there is definitely a prohibition for guns aspect to it and definitely a prohibition of speech, but it is so much broader than that, isn't it? And it really comes back to how they're using corporations to do things that they are prohibited from doing by the First Amendment, by the Second Amendment. They're using corporations to censor people. They're using corporations to destroy businesses. Talk a little bit about that and where you see that line drawn, because that's something that's kind of controversial even amongst people who are supporters of freedom. Where do you see that line being drawn between what corporations

are allowed to do on behalf of government, even if they don't connect that, make that connection there? Well, it's really, I think, an interesting plan on their part and and it puts um conservatives and in particular people like me who are you know hands-off uh conservatives who i don't want the government in regulating private industry i want the government to leave private industry the hell alone however when private industry starts operating as a branch of the government where you have the credit card industry decide that it's now associated itself with a government push to eradicate second amendment rights that suddenly puts me as a conservative in a very tough spot doesn't it because i want to say wait a minute the credit card company shouldn't be allowed to have these policies that jeopardize my constitutional freedoms at the same time

they're private organizations so it puts me in a catch-22 am i now going to advocate for the government to go in and restrict what these credit card companies can and cannot do? Am I going to push for government control of private industries? That's not in my DNA. So I think it's nefarious, but to some degree, you have to give credit where credit is due. It's somewhat intelligent because it puts the hands off conservatives like me in a very tough spot because they'll say, they're a private it's like twitter's a private entity they can you know they can sanction anyone they can censor anyone they want to facebook's a private entity but then we get it puts us in this position of starting to say well when private entities are no longer being used as a private entity but as a branch of an overreaching government then constitutional freedoms then apply to that situation because they are by extension operating as the government in order to eradicate constitutional rights. But that's an argument you don't see out there very often. And that's something we're going to have to come to grips with because the more big industry and big tech aligns itself with those

who would eradicate our constitutional freedoms, the less I think they should be treated like private companies and private organizations and more like an extension of an overreaching government. I agree. We saw this with the censorship by the internet companies and social media companies and everybody saying, well, they can do whatever they want. And at the same time, you had Jack Dorsey and multiple hearings before Congress saying we are the digital public square. And, you know, we've had situations where we've said you're not going to exclude somebody even as a private company. You're not going to exclude somebody. You're not going to kick black people out of the restaurant.

You're not going to put them in the back of the bus, refuse service to somebody like that. And so we said, there's certain things that you can't do because you are in the public arena and because you really don't have, and this is where I think the line is drawn. I'd like to know what you think about this guy. I've talked about it from the standpoint that human institutions, especially corporations that are created by given government privileges, they have privileges and they're created by humans, they're created by, you know, given government privileges. They have privileges, and they're created by humans. They're created by institutions. And so they don't have rights like human beings do. Human beings are given rights by our creator, as the Declaration of Independence says. So that's something that's different.

These other people who are in business, you know, when you open up a business, you get what? A privilege license. The government has given you a privilege to operate that. Whether you're operating it as a corporation or you're operating it as an individual, they recognize that they are authorizing you to do something. That comes with some requirements in the same way that when we did federal deposit insurance, it came with requirements that they couldn't engage in speculative activity. So if they've got this business privilege license, then there are certain restrictions about what they can't do to actual people. I think that's one of the ways that we need to understand that.

But look at the way that this is spread. First, it was Operation Chokepoint. That went away. Then they went after speech and said, well, Twitter is just like a person person and so they get to decide who they shut out of the public square then it moves back to guns and then down the road very soon and coming at us very quickly is esg where they say well we don't you know corporations don't really even have to uh provide value to their stockholders anymore they just need to do what the government says to do. You know, ESG, environmental and social goals of the government, you know, which is where

they're headed. So I think there has to be some kind of a, we have to pull back, I think, as conservatives and people who support liberty and free market. We have to also understand the distinction between these people who are acting as agents of the government and these corporations that are not the same as human beings, are they? What do you think? Yeah, no, it really, I think it's a fascinating discussion because like I said, it puts people, you know, who are normally hands-off and as I do, I mean, my foundational position,

David, is that more government control of anything is always bad and less government control of anything is always good. And that's just where I start. Right. And so whenever I hear myself advocating for more government control of anything, you know, that immediately sets off little triggers. I think the preference ought to be and where the fight ought to be first is always in the marketplace. And let capitalism, let market demand, let the consumer dissuade these people from having these people, meaning these corporations, big tech, big companies generally, from having policies that we as consumers disapprove of.

If Twitter lost half their followers overnight because we just said we're not we don't we don't choose to engage in this because of the censorship anymore if people stop using Bank of America or Citibank or whatever the other uh and I'm not naming them individually but so much just by way of example if we stopped using particular credit card if I cancel all my credit cards from those companies that I see engaged in the businesses um in the in the practices espoused by operation chokepoint and 50 million other people do exactly the same thing can't we influence those policies so i think a first priority ought to go to the marketplace and go to the consumer and say you are going to make less money and to a dramatic extent if you

engage in these practices if that that fails, because people just aren't willing to give up their credit card or people just aren't willing to give up, you know, going on Twitter and Facebook. I mean, as much as I despise the practices of Facebook, I still have a Facebook account. So I'm guilty in that respect myself. If we're not successful there, I think we need to get creative and go, you know, and look at some of the options you're talking about. But man, it's tough for me to get off my foundational position of more government control of anything is always bad. That's a, that's a, that's a tough, um, uh, issue for me to get past. I agree. Yeah. It's not necessarily telling them what they can do, but it's telling

them what they can't do. And I, as a way I look at it is you've got, we don't really have a free market anymore. We've, the government has allowed these corporations to establish, if not a monopoly, an oligarchy. You know, if you look at the social media companies, if you look at the banks, we have a few banks that are too big to fail. All these banks are getting together to push this ESG stuff. And we've seen in the last couple of years, we've seen corporations come out in open defiance and contempt and hatred of their customer base, you know, pushing some of this CRT stuff to a customer base.

Look at what NASCAR has done, what Coca-Cola has done. You look at this and say, what are they doing? That doesn't make any sense from a business standpoint, unless you look at it and say, well, I think we've moved beyond the point where it's a free market and they have to care about what the consumers want. They're only pleased with one customer. They've got one customer, and that's government. And if they get the government happy with what they're doing, then they're going to be fine. But they can get to the point where

they have such contempt for the consumers because it isn't really a market situation anymore. So I think it is important for us to get back to the foundations of, um, you know, what our country is really about with, with the declaration of independence. And, and we need to go back and start to, I think maybe, uh, clarify what we understand by, uh, rights and privileges and, and other things like that. I've got a comment here from a listener in Australia. Thank you for the tip harps. Uh, he says He says, don't let them start a firearms registry. Too many times here in Australia, the info gets leaked and farmers and other firearm owners' houses get robbed. And that's the key thing that everybody should be concerned about. Because anytime somebody is collecting any kind of information, there's a lot of different ways that that information can be gleaned and mined and cross-referenced, isn't it, Guy?

No doubt. No doubt. One point on our discussion on looking into this discrimination against lawful firearms-related or Second Amendment-related businesses is I went in and advocated strongly for a bill that we've introduced in Indiana two years in a row now. We haven't gotten it out of committee yet but we're not we're not giving up um and that is when when talking about big tech or big companies just you know discriminating as they do against lawful second amendment related businesses i think the government can provide a series of carrots or sticks and by that i mean uh by way of example the the bill we offered said if you're a financial institution and you discriminate against a firearms related

industry whether it's a firearms instructor or a gun shop or whoever it is that's fine you can have whatever practices you want however you are now off the list of companies that are eligible to this to do business with the state of indiana in other words you want your credit card to be used when people you know renew their license plates at the bureau of motor vehicles uh or or you know whatever governmental entity might be involved then don't engage in these practices but we're not telling you what to do you you have whatever practices you'd like but we will not do business with you as the indiana state government i love that concept because that that's allowing them to have whatever policies they'd like, but it provides a big stick as opposed to a carrot. And let's let free market in that aspect with the state of Indiana being a big consumer of these same services from these same companies influence them in that way. And

I think we can look at carrots and sticks and having a real influence. And that's why I helped develop that bill and fought very hard for it in the legislature this year. And I think we're having a real shot at getting it done this year. That's good. I think that's a I helped develop that bill and fought very hard for it in the legislature this year, and I think we're having a real shot at getting it done this year. That's good. I think that's a good approach. And in a sense, you could even look at it, you know, it's not only just a carrot and a stick, but you could look at it as, hey, we're going to remove some of your privileges. You know, you've got access to this database here. Well, you know, that's a privilege that we're going to grant you, but, you know, if you're going to engage in that kind of behavior, we're not going to do it. You know, they're coming at this indirectly to the banks. But, you know, Guy, there's been a lot of action directly by the ATF.

Even people inside the ATF have talked about how the Biden administration is pulling people's federal firearm licenses over minor paperwork issues. And in the past, it would just be a fine. So we know that this is an agenda. Talk a little bit about that. And what do you see there happening in indiana have you seen this happening there oh absolutely see the nature of my practice my law practice is only second amendment related that's all i do um and so when things like that start happening my phone rings a lot and let me tell you on that exact issue david it's been ringing a lot because i'll give you a good example a gun store here

locally i'm in a suburb of indianapolis my radio shows out of indianapolis but i got a call from a gentleman who's having issues with the atf on renewing his license and his local atf guy atf yeah think of atf as kind of being divided into two big groups when it comes to gun stores one is industry operations they go in and and they help them with their paperwork and they make sure their inventories are straight. And just what it sounds like, they're helping the gun store stay on the right side of the law. And then there are the door kickers, right?

They're the guys who carry guns and they're the guys who show up with an armored vest and kick doors in and do the things that atf does in terms of the industry operations folks and and my this gun store this client of mine has had the same guy that they've worked with since they opened so for years he's been doing it for 25 years for atf he came in and he said let me tell you why i don't think i can do this any longer he said under the biden administration he said my job has changed My job historically was always to come in and help you with your paperwork, help you make sure your records are straight, help you make sure you're submitting everything you need to submit timely, helping you maintain your been in office, from my superiors, my job description has fundamentally changed. My job now is to find an excuse to put you out of business. Any excuse. A different gun store, something I was working on this morning before

having the privilege of coming on your show. And ATF found the fact that the owner of a gun store had an arrest that did not even result in a conviction. It was an arrest from 1982. I kid you not, 40 years ago for shoplifting. Shoplifting as a misdemeanor from 40 years, literally 40 years ago, they came and they said, we will not renew your firearms license because we see this case was dismissed by something we call judgment withheld.

That was a teenager. A lot of times I'll just with him judgment meaning they let you off essentially the case is over for all intents and purposes they said well since it's judgment withheld that's still an open case they could amend the charges to be a felony which means you wouldn't be eligible to have a gun store so we're not going to renew your license from a 40 year old shoplifting charge they're going to put this guy out of business well he called me and let me just tell you they are not going to put him out of business i'm going to hang some scalps before that's over because this is absolutely ridiculous but it's a perfect example of how the atf now is their job is to put you out of business so if we can use a radicalized government agency like atF and then get the financial institutions on top,

all gang up on a given industry, including disallowing them from even using credit cards. I think that's the ultimate objective of this new coding system. They'll just start denying it charges. And now that we're going to so-called cashless society, right? What's the likelihood of staying in business if you can't take credit cards at your business? It's designed to come out of business. And if you and I can't go buy a at your business. It's designed to pull them out of business. And if you and I can't go buy a gun somewhere, that's a great way to eradicate the Second Amendment. You know, it's kind of interesting as we see this happening,

this ought to be a wake-up call to all of us to start thinking more about how we're going to operate in a parallel society. Because, I mean, the ultimate approach that they want is to control everything that we buy and when we can buy it, how much we can buy it, who we can buy it from and that type of thing. We know that is their plan. And so if we can't stop them with elected people, because we've got a lot of elected people who don't seem to be aware or care, or maybe they're on board with that.

I don't really see a whole lot of awareness or talk about that on the Republican side about how are we going to stop this CBDC stuff. I mean, that is a full-on agenda from Biden. He's got every branch of government operating on that. So that's coming. But right now, you know, it's affecting just the gun stores and stuff. And so, you know, we need to start thinking about how we're going to start operating outside of the system somehow, you know, operating simply on cash or something. Or, you know, if they take away the cash, you know, how we operate with gold and silver or something like that.

It is kind of, as I've seen them lock down the schools, that's been something that has been a boon to homeschooling, people getting a chance to see what the schools are really about and kind of moving them into another. So we could look at this as kind of an educational opportunity. We hope that we don't have to do that. But I've got a comment here from Greg. He says, I've got a friend that has a pawn shop and a gun shop for 25 years.

Recently, they shut it down. The feds are scrutinizing every little aspect of the deal, trying to find some kind of a mistake, some kind of an infraction. Then the financial stuff started. PayPal shutdowns, credit card stuff. He finally just said the heck with it. Uh, that that's exactly what they're trying to do. They're trying to pressure people out, but it's not going to stop at the guns right now. It's at the guns and they do want to, you know, ban firearms, but they want to ban everything

in our life. So they have absolute total control. Have you seen, go ahead. I'm sorry. I was just going to agree with you and say that, uh, but it's not something I've been saying for years and years and years on my radio show. And otherwise is that gun control is not even about guns. It's about control.

Yes, that's right. That's why they're, they're, they're exercising it right now. They say it's all about the guns, but now it's about people control. When we're talking about what they're doing with the gun stores, there's also something else that we've been seeing happening. And that is in-person visits to people who have had multiple purchases. And I've played this several times where you get a knock on the door and it's like, you just recently bought four firearms. Show me your firearms. Have you had any clients that have had a situation like

that? Yes. And there's a very simple response, which is show me your warrant. No warrant, get off my property, come back with a warrant. That's right. And because there's absolutely nothing about buying more than one gun at one time that gives any authority probable cause, either for a search or for an arrest um so there's you know it's gonna be hard pressed to find a judge to sign off on a warrant simply based on uh a multiple firearm purchase so it's you have a warrant no get out and get the hell off my property end of story because you know the more the more people say well i don't have anything to hide and well you know i i i lawfully bought these guns and i still have both of them. And so why shouldn't I cooperate?

It's because they're asking you to relinquish your constitutional freedoms. Here, we're talking about the Fourth Amendment. You know, that is an unreasonable search and seizure. That's exactly what the founders did not want happening. They did not want, you know, that government agent showing up and knocking on your door saying, you need to justify to me your decision to exercise a constitutionally protected freedom. That's not OK. And we shouldn't we shouldn't we shouldn't concede that and we shouldn't give up that fight. And yes, I've seen that happen.

And the other thing that is going to exacerbate that dramatically, David, and the FBI is doing this under the auspices of this new so-called Safer Communities Act that was just passed. That is gun control. There's no question about it. But it expanded background checks for juveniles. And we're going to now look at juvenile records to see, well, if they have a violent crime when they were a juvenile, some violent crimes can now cause you to not be able to buy a gun as an adult. So we're going to look at some increased juvenile records. And they've looked at that and they said well we've expanded background checks so what we now need even though there's no real connection it's just an excuse is they're now telling gun stores that if the gun store gets either a delay or a deny on a gun purchase in

other words let's back up the way that system works i go in to buy a gun then i fill out what's called a 4473 form that's got my identifying information it also has the information on the gun itself that i'm buying all the gun store then sends to the fbi so that there's a background check under what we call the national instant criminal background check system they just send my identifying information my name my social security number if i gave it to them, my date of birth, where I was born, that type of thing. They use my identifying information to do my background check. Now what the FBI is telling gun stores is, well, we'll back up one more time.

In response to that background check, the gun store receives one of three responses. Proceed, which means sell them the gun. Delay, which means there's something here we need to take a longer look at. So don't give them the gun now. We'll tell you sometime within the next few days whether you can give them the gun or deny, which is this guy can't buy a gun. If a person now gets either a delay, which could mean simply that they're busy at the FBI, I mean, and that you'll go try to buy a gun on Black Friday, you'll probably get

delayed. So I mean, it's a volume can cause delays but anytime anybody gets a delay or a deny the gun store is being told they have to at that point send the fbi the person's street address their home street address so that the fbi knows exactly where that person lives and why do you suppose they want that information yeah that's right yeah my son every time he goes to buy a gun, he gets a delay. He says, that's kind of suspicious about that. I mean, it could be that the time of year that he's buying, as you pointed out.

But again, there's nothing criminal about that. And, you know, when you were talking about the appropriate response to somebody being at the door, I remember the very first one of these that I saw, uh, the guy was very, you know, he, he had it all recorded on a, uh, a door camera, you know, that was there. And, and when he, uh, put it back up, he says, I got really angry with myself that I complied, but he said, the reason I did it was because, you know, there's three guys there in uniform. It's kind of intimidating. All the neighbors are looking out like, what's going on here? This guy's getting raided by the police or whatever.

I've got nothing to hide type of attitude. And the intimidation that was involved in all of that. And he got really angry with himself that he did comply. Because as you pointed out, that is allowing them to do searches without warrants and other things. And it's a very dangerous precedent that's being set there. But I've seen that type of thing, Guy, when I've reported people who have been wrongfully accused of something with CPS. And one of the things that the advocates for parents will say is like, I know that when

they come to you and there's an accusation, you want to show that, look, I've done nothing at all. I'm completely innocent but uh that frequently becomes something that they use to attack you and uh so you know the appropriate response they're coming to your door whether it's like show me your guns or show me your kids or whatever it's like get a warrant i'll call my lawyer and before we talk people shy away from that because they think well that's that's like, it looks like I've got something to hide. No, we have to keep these people obedient to the law because the worst kind of criminal is a government criminal.

When the government is acting criminal, acting outside the law, that is the most dangerous kind of criminal, isn't it? It is. And listen, I say often, and I couldn't agree with you more on this point, what I've said to people often is what we need to get our heads around is that innocent people have constitutional rights too. And this whole idea of, well, I have nothing to hide, so I'll just roll over on any government request to search my vehicle, search my home, demand by ATF to show guns. No, as an innocent person, I also have constitutional freedoms. And our founders of this great country wanted us as innocent people to be as protected as people who did have something. In fact, perhaps even more where probable cause a crime has occurred is an exception. Right. To prohibition against a search or a seizure.

So so so the idea that that I don't have anything to hide. So I should I should willingly give up my constitutional freedoms, that's as repugnant to me as it could possibly be because the founders wanted me to have the same freedoms and wanted me as an innocent person with nothing to hide, be able to stand on the constitution and tell the government to go pound sand. I agree. And government, I'll even give some inside baseball here. There's something that law enforcement, I'll even give you some inside baseball here. There's something that law enforcement, I've seen this in traffic stops over and over. I've seen it on personal visits when they come to someone's home.

Law enforcement officers, and I've seen this in some of the videos of ATF showing up at people's houses after either a denial or a delay now or with a multiple gun purchase. But they'll show up and they'll use the phrase, David, I'm going to need to, they'll say, I'm going to need to search your vehicle. All right. Yeah. And it sounds like, well, you've, they've got a right to search my vehicle. So they're just telling me they're about to search my vehicle. And then what do I say? I'm going to need to search your vehicle. So I'm going to need to see those two guns.

That sounds like he has the authority to demand that. So I then say, okay, or, you know, a traffic stop, you know, I'm going to need to serve. You know, I see a guy that your license plate says to a attorney, which it does. Right. So he says, well, that gives me a reason to believe there's a gun in your car. So I'm going to need to search your vehicle to find that gun. Okay. I'm going to need to, if I say, oh, well, you're going to need to, so you're not asking my permission. You're just telling me what you're going to do anyway. And I say, okay.

He gets me out of the vehicle. He searches my vehicle. His police report will be written exactly like this. That consent to search the vehicle was requested from the individual. The individual then gave permission and gave consent to the search. You can always consent to any violation of your constitutional rights. As soon as I say, okay, to I'm going to need to, they will write it as I gave consent. That's a very important point. And I've had that be pulled. And I speak to law

enforcement officers a lot on constitutional rights. And I'll say, I know what you guys do. You use that phrase essentially to trip people into giving consent when they're not really giving consent. They're just acknowledging something that you've said and they all smile and and wink and look at each other like that's exactly what we do and look i don't think law enforcement officers are necessarily out there you know trying to frame innocent people necessarily but i think an awful lot want to stretch what they're allowed to do under the constitution as far as they possibly can maybe they justify that saying well they're trying to catch bad guys, but guess what? In the meantime, if you're violating my constitutional rights, that's not okay. So I'm going to need to, should be always be responded to as if you're asking me

for consent, sir, I do not give that consent. That's right. But first I'm going to need to see your search warrant. That's a better response. I wish I'd said that. That's exactly right. Yeah. I remember years ago, a really egregious case in New Jersey, a guy was moving and he had a concealed carry license and all this other kind of stuff. He was moving from one state to another state. He stopped in New Jersey to visit relatives. He was late. They were concerned about him. So they called the police. The police pulled him over. They saw him and pulled him over. And then they said, I'm going to need to search your car. And he had in his trunk buried under clothes and all kinds of stuff that he was carrying locked in the trunk. They found a gun and they came after him.

They wound up putting him in jail, you know, because New Jersey rules and things. So, yeah, you don't need to show them anything they need a search warrant that's that's exactly yeah new jersey the story i always tell from new jersey is absolutely true is a person was flying from minnesota to pennsylvania and they had legally declared a firearm in their check bag because they could legally carry in minnesota and they could legally carry at their destination in uh uh where they were flying to in Pennsylvania and so they declared their gun which is all according to TSA regulations and whatnot but because of weather they got diverted to Newark and so he had to land in Newark it was the last flight in there were no more flights going out so they said we're going to put you up at the airport hotel since we're putting up with the hotel we're going to give you your your luggage

back so you've got your toiletries and a change of clothes and whatnot guy spends the night in the airport hotel it goes back to the ticket counter New Jersey and says I need to declare the unloaded firearm in my check bag for TSA regulations there's cop standing right there who says I'm going to need to see your handgun license, your New Jersey handgun license. He goes, well, I don't have a New Jersey handgun license. Took him to jail. Wow. And he goes, he goes, I didn't want to come to New Jersey.

Nobody wants to go to New Jersey. Nobody ever wants to go there for any reason. The airline brought me to New Jersey. I didn't want to come to New Jersey. And they put him in jail. Wow. So, I mean, that's what we're faced with within some of these states. Wow.

Well, we got an election coming up. I mean, what, what is on, uh, is there, is there anything concrete? You know, we, we've identified a lot of problems. Have you seen, uh, GOP politicians identifying these same problems or other things to roll them back? Well, what are, what are your expectations? I mean, we're, we're hoping that, um, uh, that, uh, the, the house is is going to turn, perhaps, and shut down some of these things. But, of course, the dangerous thing is that Biden is still going to be there.

And even if you had Second Amendment supporters, you know, you had GOP who really supported the Second Amendment, and they had a majority in both the house and the senate we've now established this idea that um the president can do gun control by executive order that was set up by trump and now uh biden has done that with the brace you know trump did it with a bump stock biden did it with a brace now he's done it with uh you know something else and and indicates that he plans on continuing to do that. I mean, where are we politically? What, what, how do you see this as somebody who focuses on this, uh, uh, very closely? I think that all our, our real advancement on second amendment rights,

where we actually, you know, we actually moved the needle in advance of our rights and in furtherance of our rights, that's all going to be done at the local level, at the state level and the local level. I, you know, where Indiana this last year became the 24th state to adopt constitutional carry. And after we did, Alabama did. So now half our states in the country have constitutional carry. So you don't have to go beg the permission from the government to exercise a right you already have, which is to bear arms or carry a firearm, to get Congress. If we, I say we, if Republicans take a majority in the Senate and the House, as you said, you're not going to get anything past a Biden veto for two years. Unfortunately, where I think there's a huge failing in the National Republican Party is that even if we see, you know, a President DeSantis or Trump again in 2024, I don't think this Congress and Republicans in Congress, the

majority of them, or at least enough of them, have a real will to advance our rights because they're so deathly afraid of being criticized for somehow, you know, enabling the next mass shooter, right? I agree. They are so afraid of being connected to some act of violence out there, even though that act of violence is solely the responsibility of some lunatic who wants to go murder people and people simply blame the instrumentality. Our national politicians are so afraid of that connection that I don't have any real optimism in getting like something like national reciprocity, which just makes sense.

If, if my driver's license is recognized in all 50 States, why shouldn't my, my, my carry license? Yeah. The carry license is harder to get than a driver's license for sure. Exactly. In fact, and I got to tell you the Obergefell decision on gay marriage, however, anybody feels about gay marriage, take that issue off the table. The analysis of why every state, not only do states have to marry people of same sex, according to the Supreme Court in that decision, but why every state has to recognize those licenses of same sex couples under 14th Amendment principles.

The court's analysis is directly online if you took marriage license out of those two paragraphs of the spring court's opinion and put in carry license or license to carry handgun it reads perfectly under the analysis that they laid out and i would like to litigate that issue and win it but failing that there's no reason why my carry license shouldn't be recognized in all 50 states that just makes sense sense. We've had bills pass in the House and not get through the Senate in the past or vice versa, depending on majorities. There's no reason that shouldn't happen. It should happen as soon as Republicans have control of the government again. Do I have any faith it will? No, because I think our GOP politicians at the national level just simply lack courage on the second amendment. Oh, I agree. Yeah. Yeah. Where is the bill to outlaw, uh, SUVs, uh,

because of the walk of saw, you know, killer gun, you know, running people down at the Christmas parade, right. They didn't do that. They didn't blame that instrument of death. Of course, they do want to outlaw SUVs, but for different reasons, but let's not push that analogy too far because they just might take us up on that. But, you know, I think you were absolutely right when you said the good stuff is going to come at the local level. And I think that's even true.

Even when you look at Obergefell, you know, when they, when, um, um, when you had a Scalia and Thomas, especially Thomas talking about a Roe v. Wade, he said, look, there's certain things that need to be decided at the state level. And even they recognize that the Supreme Court had overstepped its authority in terms of defining that. But you know, once they defined it, you got a marriage license here, you got a marriage license there, you got a carry license there, carry license there, that's true. But I think the real power and what the conservative movement should really be doing

is trying to do things at the state level and asserting the 10th amendment to say, we have these, these powers and this has not been delegated to the federal government. And so even if Biden does some kind of gun control by executive order, not just vetoing what, you know, the Republicans might do in the Congress,

but if he proactively creates some new kind of gun control by an executive order, because that's what Lala Harris promised to do that when she was running for president. She said, I'm going to give them 100 days, and if they don't do what I want, I'm going to do it by executive order, because Trump had done that with bump stocks. And so, you know, he'd set the precedent. She was going to carry through with that. The way you stop that is with the Tenth Amendment, isn't it? Yeah, it absolutely is and i gotta tell you i mean to to get completely on a philosophical soapbox i think the greatest travesty in in the the many years of this country has been what the

spring court has allowed congress to do under the commerce clause that the commerce clause simply allows congress to regulate any damn thing it wants to. If there's some remote theoretical hypothetical connection to interstate commerce, that's never what the founders intended in the commerce clause. And what they intended was the meaning and intent of the 10th Amendment, which is exactly as you laid out. It's either expressly, specifically. Yes. Within a constitutional delegation of authority to the federal government or they don't have that power. I mean, I tell people and they look at me like I'm crazy. I

said, do you know that there is no police power delegated to the federal government and the constitution? They look at me and go, how could that possibly be? I mean, we have more people running around with federal badges and guns than we have United States Marines, right? FBI and ATF and postal inspectors that are armed. I mean, we have more people running around with federal badges than we have United States Marines, and there's no federal police power. The founders always intended the police power to reside in the states, and we have turned that on its head. And I think that's the greatest travesty. And that combined with the fact that we've allowed, through the executive branch, the creation of what is really a fourth branch of government, which is executive agencies. Yes.

And we've given them legislative ability. We've given them judicial ability, which means they can interpret not only their own regulations that they pass, but their own delegation of power. That'd be nice. I wish I could define my own delegation of authority that my wife gives me, right? I know what you said, but I'm going to define that however I want to. And then they can obviously execute, which is their only job is defined by the constitution. So we've given all three constitutional powers, legislative, judicial, and executive to this fourth branch of government. And that's why you have a rogue ATF. That's why you have a rogue IRS. And I'm hopeful. I have some vague hope, a glimmer of hope that this

West Virginia v. EPA case that just came down this term under this Supreme Court, and I'm excited about this Supreme Court, it came down and they said, oh, hold on. There has to be an express delegation of authority by congress to the administrative agency to the executive agency you can't just make it up as you go that's right and i read that and i said oh let's talk about atf now because we got to reign those people in too and that's just you know that's that's what my particular ox being gored but but that that gave me a glimmer of hope that this supreme Court may start reining in on this absolutely unfettered delegation of authority to federal agencies because that just scares, not only as a Second Amendment advocate, but just someone who loves freedom and loves our country. That, I think, is our greatest threat right now.

Oh, I absolutely agree. You and I are on the same page. I have talked about that for the longest time, about they basically become little governments each of them to themselves. You know, they write the rules. They enforce the rules. They you have no because they call it a rule because they call it a civil rule. They say, well, it's not a law because it wasn't passed by your elected representatives. So you don't get any presumption of innocence.

You don't get any protection against excessive fines. And we will determine what is there. You know, we've gotten into this situation, Guy, I always talk about it. I say we now not only have taxation without representation, but we have regulation without representation because that's what these people have done. The Congress has really abdicated all this stuff. Remember when Nancy Pelosi said we have to pass it so we can find out what's in it? And everybody said, is she crazy?

What's the matter with her? No, that's the way the government works. They pass these broad guidelines, and then they turn it over to the bureaucracy and the bureaucracy fills in all the devilish details. That's the way the thing, she was actually being honest with people for once. Totally. And by the way, then the elected official has no accountability because when we don't like what the IRS does to us or the ATF does to us, if we don't like that, we go and we

say, we don't like it. The government official says, well, that's, that's the FBI or, you know, that's the ATF. That's the IRS. I didn't do that. Don't vote me out of office. So it's a way to avoid any accountability for what our government is doing to us. And consider the word, you mentioned the Declaration of Independence. And I always go back, not, you know, the, the, the, the wording that even though Biden can never remember it, right. But the, the, the primary, you know, phrase that people talk about with, you know, the unalienable rights endowed by our creator, when, when people, people think about that, what I think about, I think about the governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, from the consent of the governed from the consent of the governed i think about those words all the time david because because when the irs does something that that causes me real you know real harm i

mean it takes money out of my pocket could potentially put me in jail right how do i withhold my consent like my elected official i can say well i don't like that vote on that bill or i don't like that bill you introduced or i don't like the fact that you refuse to support my billing in that committee hearing that i watched. So I'm going to withhold my consent from you in the next election. And that's what the founders had in mind. How do I do that with these administrative agencies? How is an administrative agency accountable to the government such that we're either giving or withholding the consent of the government? That's our system of government. And this fourth branch of government through executive agencies

has eradicated. People talk about the founders spinning in their graves. I think this would be the number one thing that would cause them torment. No doubt. Oh yeah. They put their rules through a comment period and you can comment if you know about it and then they can look at it and say, yeah, I don't care. Just pitch it over their shoulder. You know, that's, that's, I guess they're, they're little, uh, uh guess their little ritual to pretend that they're somehow, you know, under us. But that's a key thing. You know, when you talk about how many people in all these different federal bureaucracies that are armed, as the report came out, you know, more than we have armed Marines. And we have all these different armed bureaucracies and, um, there's

not really anything that, uh, uh, Congress is doing to keep them under control for years. You had, uh, Rand Paul introducing the rains act. He did it on a regular basis when he first became Senator and there would be people in the house that would introduce the same thing, but they could never get, uh, any, uh, anybody to really help them much. I mean, there just really wasn't a consensus for doing anything about it because they can always come in. And first of all, they, as you point out, they denied that they've gotten any responsibility for it. But if it gets really bad, they can come in and pretend they're going to protect

you from this, like some kind of a night on a white horse, right? Uh, oh, I saw how the bureaucracy got after you. Well, we're going to fix that. You know, when they shouldn't have never, they should never have let the bureaucracy get that far out of hand. Exactly. And, and that's why, again, this, this EPA V West Virginia case, um, by this Supreme court does give me that little glimmer of hope because this

is where the EPA was just making up. I think it was clean air. I always get clean air and clear water turned around, but they just made up, I believe it was a clean air regulation within EPA such that they could put people out of business, companies out of business with this regulation. And they said, well, we're the EPA.

That's what we do. And we're going to pass this regulation. We're going to enforce this regulation. And this Supreme Court said, hold on. We can't find an express specific delegation of authority from Congress to you to do that. That thing right there, that's not okay. That's inconsistent with the 10th Amendment. That's inconsistent with the limitation on express delegation of power to the executive branch. And while Congress can delegate its legislative

authority, and as you and I have been discussing, does far too often, we're going to make them expressly and specifically do that before we let a regulatory agency run wild. And that's music to my ears, even though I have no direct involvement in EPA regulations as far as my law practice goes. That extends to all walks of life for Americans if we can start reining that in. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. We saw a lot of that during this pandemic stuff and the CDC putting on moratorium on evictions and all that kind of stuff. Grabbing power, they'll take it whenever they can get it, anywhere they can. It's great talking to you, Guy.

And tell people you've got the Gun Guy podcast, right? Is that anywhere you find podcasts? Where can people find you? Yeah. It's out there. It's on iTunes. It's on Omni. I think it's about anywhere you find podcasts? Where can people find you? Yeah, it's out there. It's on iTunes. It's on Omni. I think it's about anywhere you find podcasts.

What that is is I have a live radio show in Indianapolis, David, on Saturday afternoon. People can listen to live at wibc.com. And then each show we post as a podcast out various places. It's a live radio show, but people can find that podcast on iTunes or Omni or any of the other platforms. Oh, that's great. And is your radio program, is that on the internet so people can join it and make comments online or something like that? Yeah. Good.

Yeah, wibc.com. Absolutely. Well, it's great talking to you. Thank you for what you're doing. It is really the tip of the spear in terms of freedom. They're setting up the examples coming through Second Amendment, coming through the First Amendment. So it's very important what you're doing. Thank you so much, Guy. Gun Guy. Thank you. It's an honor to be here. Thank you. The Gun Guy Show. Thank you very much,

Guy. Appreciate that. In the little bit of time that we got left, I would just want to talk about this particular essay from Dr. James Alexander. He said, there is no coherent conservative doctrine. So arguing about how conservative leadership candidates are is pointless. This is coming out of the UK. And as this guy is talking about the history of conservatism in the UK, he says, so what is it? He said, there is a phenomenon which we'll call X, and this X is the resistance of society to taxation and to coercion. So is that what conservatism is? He goes back and he looks at the history of conservatism.

He says, you know, what conservatism has come to mean, really, he said in 1826, you had John Cam Hobhouse joked about the existence of His Majesty's opposition standing against His Majesty's government. But people immediately recognized the truth of that system. Government and opposition were no longer the government, the court within, and then the country that was from the outside. It wasn't this juxtaposition. Both of them were within the same system. And furthermore, he said, originally, conservatism was compromised, even corrupt. He said men who had opposed the French Revolution now accepted these things, like the Reform Act.

They'd been convinced not by truth, but by time. And conservatism became a word for the attempt to recognize the political significance of time. I think that's a very important insight. Because I've talked about it for the longest time, the problem with conservatism, and I say it often, I say, well, you know, the Democrats have become the communists of my youth, and the Republicans have become the Democrats of my youth. We see this continual movement, this ratcheting, if you will. The conservatives will resist what the left has put in until enough time passes.

And then they will never go back to the previous state. They try to always conserve the status quo. And so they're convinced not by truth, but by time. And we need to get past that kind of thinking. Well, that's it for the program today. Thank you for joining us. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Pass to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us.

Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com The David Knight Show