The David Knight Show - 27Apr23 Depopulation Agenda of WarpSpeed Jabs Laid Bare

Episode Date: April 27, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESTestimony from St. James Massacre survivor about how last week's guest, Charl van Wyk, saved her life just as she was about to be executed by a terrorist pointing a gun at her. Yet another case where someone armed with even a small firearm in a "gun-free" zone can save those being attacked by multiple shooters with fully automatic weapons 2:29 Liberal SCOTUS justices come to the defense of Clarence Thomas as efforts to find something on him increase. 13:49 Majority of GOP in House are pushing hard to escalate the Ukraine war. A troubling resolution is about to be introduced by the majority neocons. 18:53 How Fauci is trying to run away from any responsibility, even though it’s a mandate. 23:29 Has RFK Jr changed his tune on man-made global warming? WATCH RFKj make absurd outrageous claims "predicted by science" when he interviewed Nathan Thurm (Martin Short). Martin Short is funny, but RFKj's "science" is pure lunacy 28:54 The greatest crime against humanity in history. The WarpSpeed conspiracy. Depopulation is the long term effect of the jabs. 33:40Pfizer money to several groups was conveniently NOT reported as they pushed vaccine passports and mandates in August 2021 53:49 Are You Listening? Teachers/Biden Tell You AGAIN, Your Kids Don't Belong to You "There's no such thing as someone else's child". You're not even co-parenting if you put your kids in government school 1:04:44 Trump's sudden move to left and it's not just cultural issues 1:22:47 INTERVIEW Triffin Dilemma & Defunding the "World's Policeman"Tony Arterburn, WiseWolf.gold, on gold, how sanctions have pushed nations to defund the "world's policeman" by moving away from the petrodollar. 1:33:18 INTERVIEW Honest Elections: What Would It Take?Joseph Fried, CPA & auditor with 40 yrs professional experience, on various types of election fraud and what it would take to have honest elections in Republican controlled states and in Democrat controlled states. Author of "Debunked?: An Auditor Reviews the 2020 election — and Lessons Learned" 2:02:59Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Don't let foot pain or discomfort hold you back. At Foot Solutions, we specialise in high quality supportive footwear. And use the latest scanning technology to custom make orthotics, designed for your unique feet. If you want to free your feet and joints from pain, improve balance or correct alignment, book a free foot assessment at foot solutions dot ie or pop in store today. Foot Solutions, the first step towards pain free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 27th of April, Year of Our Lord 2023. It's amazing how the lies of big pharma are now being pulled back and revealed, like layers of an onion. And so there's a lot that has now been revealed in the coming days and, of course, as we talked about yesterday. Fauci is on the run. He's like Nathan Thurm. Funny you would say that. So we're going to have some fun with Fauci, but we're also going to take a look at the very serious things that have been uncovered. I want to get more into Biden, his agenda, his idea that the kids belong to government.

Yes, that still is a thing with the democrats all of them believe that but of course so do all the big donors corporate donors the billionaire donors in both parties we'll talk about that as well we have a guest who's going to be joining us to talk about he's a cpa he's going to talk about election integrity. We'll be right back. And of course, we're also going to be joined today by Tony Ardaman, wisewolf.gold. We're going to be talking about the economy, what is happening with that. A lot of changes happening very rapidly everywhere. But I want to begin with the news and some positive news for a change. And I want to start with a story, kind of a follow-up to what we had last week. I talked to Charles Van Vick,

if you recall, and he was there at the St. James Massacre. And I was forwarding it to somebody yesterday who was trying to put together some information to fight the gun control here in Tennessee that's being pushed by the governor, trying to appease, hopeless to appease us. Of course, he's not trying to appease the Democrats or the gun control crowd. He's trying to please celebrities that are coming by, talking to him, that type of thing. You know, you don't want to not be invited to the cocktail parties and you don't want to be taken off of the contribution list. I don't think it's going to get through the legislature there, even though he's calling back for a special session. I don't think it's going to get through. But so I was talking about Charles von Witt and giving them information about this shooting.

It's one of several interviews that I've done about the Second Amendment. And I came across this story that was the 20th anniversary of that shooting. And I was really touched by it, the personal issues here. And I think this story about what happened at St. James and what Charles van Vick did there, the missionary who had struggled with whether or not he should have a gun because would he use it against somebody? And then he, as he thought about it, studied it, it's like, yeah, I have not only the right to do that, but I have a duty to protect innocent life. And he did that in an amazing way. And so I've talked about him several times, but in this article that was on the 20th anniversary, it began and they talked to this lady that you'll see right here.

The person that they interviewed was this young woman, Lisa Robertson. They said it's been 20 years since Lisa Robertson ran from St. James Church in Kenilworth. A frightened 16-year-old girl in a blood-spattered jersey with gunshots and explosions ringing in her ears. She's not been back since. And when more than 1,000 people filled the Kenilworth church this evening, March 20 years since, 11 people were killed and another 58 injured in the massacre,

she will not be one of them. She will not go back to the place where her best friend died protecting her. On July 25, 1993, the church's 1,500-strong congregation, including a group of Russian seamen, gathered for a Sunday evening service. Outside, trees swayed in the strong winds as dark clouds pelted Cape Town with rain. Robertson and her schoolmate, Bonnie Reeves, had coaxed her friend, Richard O'Kill, into joining them. He was hesitant at first. He was tired from an earlier church service, but while he protested, Robertson noted with some satisfaction that her 17-year-old friend

was enjoying himself as he listened to a duet rendition of a hymn, More Than Wonderful. Robertson felt safe and warm inside the church. So when four men wearing balaclavas and brandishing rifles spilled in through the door just in front of her, she thought it was a joke. The sharp report of gunfire swallowed her confusion, and the last strains of the hymn turned into screams. She said, that was when Richard pushed me down. He was so quick he didn't hesitate even for a second. Around her, people were dropping to the ground as bullets tore through the pews, sending splinters of wood spinning into the air.

Bonnie was still standing up. She was hysterical, laughing at the men. Rich got up again to pull her down, and that's when the bullet hit him. He collapsed on top of her, blood seeping from his head, for the bullet had struck him. Robertson said the acrid smell of the gunpowder and blood, the sight of O'Kill's maimed and dying body, and the sounds of the M26 hand grenades exploding still burned in her memory. One of the men, she said, was shooting people on the ground. He turned the gun on me. I thought it would end there, lying between the pews. Time seemed to stand still, but that was when someone started shooting back at them, and the men started

running. The man shooting back was Charles Van Wick. He had unstrapped the.38 special revolver from his ankle and kneeling, was firing over the pew in the fourth row. The former salesman, now full-time missionary, would later be lauded by the police for retaliating. He was credited with being responsible for forcing these terrorists into an early retreat, preventing them from carrying out orders to expend their ammunition and set off a petrol bomb. They were going to burn the whole place down.

Their plans, as they said later on, were to, their plans were to shoot everybody there and to then, you know, hand grenades shooting, and then they were going to burn the place down. So they said, even a few weeks after the massacre, Charles was wracked with guilt. I thought I could have done more, that I could have acted sooner. When they walked through the door, he said, I thought it was a play. It was only when I saw the bullets tearing through the wooden benches that I realized have acted sooner. When they walked through the door, he said, I thought it was a play. It was only when I saw the bullets tearing through the wooden benches that I realized what was happening.

Well, Charles did do more. He has been a very outspoken person about defending innocent life. As I said, he created Gun Owners of South Africa when I interviewed him. He's written now two books about shooting back. And I find it interesting that even in this horrific account, they, I call them terrorists, they call them Azanian People's Liberation Army soldiers. That's what they call them. Because of course, the Marxists have taken over. You don't call these people terrorists now even though they're perhaps uh well they're certainly as bad as they ever were perhaps more so but he did everything he could to warn churches in the

u.s and elsewhere years before it happened here and i know this horrific story, but it is a hopeful story, and it is something that I think is a key story. I've interviewed him now twice, once many years ago, and it is a very important story because I think I interviewed him almost 10 years ago, about the 20th anniversary, and so it's the 30th anniversary now i believe and um but it's a very important story because the narrative coming from the left is that we have to ban all these modern sporting rifles the ar-15s and so forth that you just can't stand up against an ar-15 and they're always used by the bad guys and of course that's not true

either we've had situations uh uh in the texas church shooting the person who stopped it who shot the um drove the guy off shot him and drove him off and he subsequently died he had an ar-15 he was an nra So forth. We've also seen with the recent mall shooting guy goes in, he's got, I think a couple of AR 15s or whatever, a pistol. Uh, but he was shooting people in the mall. And of course there was one guy who disobeyed the signs saying you can't carry a pistol in a mall. And he was able to pull that up lean uh pull that out lean up against a

pillar to stay wise himself and take that killer out before he killed any more people and charles did not kill these guys but ran them off and again you know he didn't think that he was going to be able to hit anybody from the distance that he was so he ran out the back of the church shot at him from that. They thought there were multiple shooters defending the place. And they had picked it because it was a soft target. But just understand, this is one guy with a.38, a snub-nosed.38. These are not accurate over a long distance.

And he only had five shots. These are four guys with hand grenades fully automatic rifles and molotov cocktails to burn the church down once they're thrown all the grenades in and used all their uh all their bullets and so the point is that um this is not about firepower this is about them not understanding and knowing this is an argument again for armed teachers in classrooms they didn't think anybody was going to be protecting the place uh perhaps if there had been some visible protection, maybe they would have gone to another church, and maybe that church wouldn't have had anybody there. But the bottom line is that you need to have people who are carrying concealed. You need to understand that you're not necessarily

going to be outgunned. The element of surprise is in your favor if you're carrying concealed, and many other aspects of that. It's the same kinds of arguments that i always heard from reporters when i was with the libertarian party as a candidate or as the editor uh and um they would say well you think that um you think that firearms are going to stop the federal government because i was always adamant about the fact that the second amendment is not ultimately about self-protection. Uh, that was a given with those people. Uh, I don't need it for hunting. Everybody would have it for hunting. Everybody would have it for self-protection, but they knew that they needed it because a government had kicked off the previous war by trying to come for the cannons. And so I said, yeah, you know, they would say,

well, you can't stop a government that's got all kinds of modern weapons. The same kind of argument that we've heard from Eric Swalwell, from Biden and others. You can't stop them with handguns. And it's like, well, take a look at what happened at the Warsaw Ghetto. Take a look at asymmetric warfare and uh so it is ultimately not about total firepower and so it's a great story a great example and i would encourage you he's got the book if you want to um uh get his book uh you know you could pass that interview around, but it is a great example to put in the face of the people who

are saying, well, we don't want armed teachers and we shouldn't allow people to carry guns in churches, as Governor Hochul in New York is saying. One other thing, too, before we get into political news and the back and forth with people who are stabbing people in the back that I think was hopeful and that is comments about Clarence Thomas, there's been a lot of smears and attacks on Clarence Thomas. And look, he's like anybody else. I'm sure he's not perfect, but whether or not he is a guilty of influence peddling is what they're trying to imply. He's now had two judges on the left who have come out and talked about his character.

A man of integrity. It's not often in our fractured political culture that we see people from opposing sides openly defending one another. Yet, we see retired Justice Stephen Breyer, a liberal who was nominated by Bill Clinton, recently defended Justice Thomas, who has been under fire in the media of late. Breyer, at a conference in Boston last Friday for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, called Thomas, quote, a man of integrity, said he never saw Thomas act in an unethical way. He says, as far as I'm concerned, I sat next to him on the bench for 28 years. I like him. He's a friend of mine. I've never seen him do anything underhanded or say anything underhanded.

And they point out in this article from billy hollowell on faithwire he says this isn't the court's first current or former member to defend thomas last summer sonia sotomayor said this to the american constitutional society praising thomas The American Constitutional Society praising Thomas personally. Listen to what she had to say. But I suspect I have probably disagreed with him more than with any other justice. That we have not joined each other's opinions more than anybody else. And yet Justice Thomas is the one justice in the building that literally knows every employee's name, every one of them. And not only does he know their names, he remembers their family's names and histories. it hung up histories he's the first one who will go up to someone when you're walking with him and say is your son okay how's your daughter doing in college he's the first one that when my stepfather sent me flowers in Florida. He is a man who cares deeply about the court as an institution,

about the people who work there, but about people. He has a different vision than I do. All right, and we're having some problems with that video, so let's come back to that. She said they have a different vision, but that's one of the things that Tucker Carlson was saying in his speech at the Heritage Foundation last week. He said, you know, we used to have a situation

where people would have very different ideas about how we get there, but we had the same goal that we wanted to ultimately help people. And we might have honest disagreements about that. He said, now we've got a situation where everybody just wants to burn everything down. And of course they want to burn down every institution and they want to burn down their opposition. And so, uh, I'm not, I don't know, uh, Clarence Thomas. I got to say that, um, you know, to hear people who disagree with him on so many issues, talk about what a personable person he is how he takes a personal interest

in everybody and remembers their names that's something that i have a difficult time with uh in person if i don't write something down i get a very good memory if i write something down or if i read it if i highlight it but in terms of you know when i'm out talking to people i have a difficult time remembering names so i was impressed that he would do that and um and he works very hard at that to uh remember people and so i just wanted to uh show those two things there are things that we can do that are going to make a big difference in this world and we need to approach it from the standpoint, we need to have this debate over what is the appropriate way to interact with this. But we also need to understand there's a lot of people who don't want to help. And I guess that's the difficult thing for many of us to understand.

That's the world that we grew up in, where people would disagree, but they had the same goal, they disagree about how to get there and now we're in a situation where there is open evil and we're going to talk about this when we get into the pharmaceutical stuff coming up open evil where people are deliberately weaponizing this to harm others i just want to say too as we we're going to talk a little bit about pharmaceutical stuff. But we now have the GOP House is now going full-on war. This is one of the reasons why you see wars beginning under Democrats because they know that it's going to be easier to get it there because the Republican opposition is going to jump on board.

They're right there if there's a war. Joe Wilson, Republican of South Carolina, has planned to introduce a resolution in the House that would declare that it is U.S. policy to seek a Ukrainian victory against Russia. And they define what winning means. And so Dave DeCamp at Antiwar.com says they've defined it to restoring Ukraine to its internationally recognized 1991 borders.

And it's co-sponsored by a Democrat. This is likely to go through. And of course, the Biden administration wants this. The only reason I could see that the Biden administration would not jump on board this is if they want to have an undefined termination point so they can keep this going on forever or if their termination point is regime change which by the way will also keep it going forever may ignite a nuclear war if the biden administration doesn't sign on to this. I think they will because they can still change the goal posts later. But this begins to make this a bipartisan move with Republicans on board. There'll be a few Republicans who will oppose this, but the vast majority will support it,

I think. The House Foreign Affairs Committee is chaired by Representative Mike McCaul of Texas, a Republican. He has been calling on Biden to arm Ukraine with longer-range weapons that can launch strikes on Crimea. And then into Russia, of course. Leaks allegedly released by Airman Jack Teixeira revealed that the Biden administration

doesn't think Ukraine can regain territory from its expected counteroffensive. The Pentagon has also told Congress it's unlikely Ukraine will be able to retake Crimea. The offensive looks like a fantasy, apparently. Making it official, U.S. policy to support these goals would guarantee a prolonged conflict and would risk an escalation that could lead to direct NATO-Russia clash, says antiwar.com. And I agree with them. And I, as we've said, the goal is regime change.

That was also in the leaked documents. They want to overthrow Russia. The congressional staffer told Yahoo that the bill quote, demonstrates the wide support in Congress for Ukrainian victory. We all need to move beyond quote, as long as it takes unquote, and embrace Ukrainian victory as our rallying cry in order for Ukraine to win the war. This year. Yeah, right.

It is just a, we'll talk about it when we come back. We're going to talk about the war on us that is already happening. And of course, there's many wars, aren't there? You know, we used to have things like the war on poverty, which I never supported, but that was supposed to be a war to help people. Now we've got the drug war, which is a war of drugs against the American people by the CIA. And now they've escalated this to the COVID war, which is a war on us with the vaccines. We have a war on energy.

We have a war on transportation. We've got a war on food. We've got a war on housing. We've got a war on housing. They are coming for everything in our society. And we're going to talk about that when we come back. Stay with us. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, yesterday I talked about how Fauci is trying to run away from any responsibility. I didn't shut down any schools.

I didn't close any businesses. That was done by people locally. And there's a lot of truth to that. Of course, he was the one who was directing them. But that's why I've said from the very beginning, the people at the local level can nullify these orders. And he said, they're recommendations. Right, right. Yeah, they didn't mandate any vaccines.

They just coerced you. Yeah. I just told you, you can't go in here, but it's not a mandate. You know, mandate. We'd come in there and we'd,

you know, put you on the floor and inject it into your arm, drag you out of your house, whatever necessary. Now, uh, they coerced people. It was a mandate.

These weren't just recommendations. We all know that how ridiculous this is, but you can always nullify it at the local level. You know, the church closures. I remember very early on, I talked to a pastor that was up in Illinois, where Pritzker, the Democrat, is in charge. And of course, he was being paid billions of dollars by the Trump White House, Trump himself.

And they wanted them to lock down. And as they were doing this stuff, they kept giving them money to Republican governors as well. But in that state where Pritzker was locking down, you know, in Chicago and other places like that, locking down everybody, in this small Illinois town, this pastor was keeping his church open, never closed. And the sheriff was a member of the church and his deputies, and they were parked there at the church, but they weren't there to

take down license numbers or to issue fines or to shut the church down. They were there to stop the state police that Governor Pritzker had threatened to use to shut the church down. They were not going to let that happen. So Babylon B says, um, she made that statement. Here's the way Babylon B does the headline. Fauci says he never locked anything down and he's never even heard of COVID and a testy exchange with an interview for meet the press last week. Fauci claimed he never locked down schools and hasn't even heard of COVID COVID. I've never even heard of such a thing.

What is COVID? It sounds made up. And I certainly had nothing to do with locking down schools and destroying kids, learning and development for every year. What kind of monster would do something like that? You must have me confused with somebody else. Yeah, basically, this is satire,

but it's not that far off from what he actually did. He was actually channeling Martin Short doing Nathan Thrum, remember this? I appreciate your willingness to talk with us tonight. What do you mean by that? Well, simply that we want to thank you for taking time out from your schedule why wouldn't i be able to take time out from my schedule so interesting that you think i wouldn't be able to take time out from my schedule

yeah that's that's where fauci is today he's gone from being godfather to nathan therm or thrum or whatever the guy's name was. Anyway, but you know, there is one person who agrees with Fauci, always had agreed with Fauci. Who would that person be? We're talking about vaccinating kids who were five years old to 12 years old and then forcing them to continue to wear masks. Our heroes are being fired.

They're losing their jobs. Are you sorry you didn't fire Anthony Fauci? Well, it's not because of him they're losing their job. It's because of some bad policies that are being made by the Biden administration. Yeah, it's not Fauci's fault, says Trump. It's not his fault. And by the way, those vaccines are great. I love those vaccines.

They save the world, right? No, actually not. And by the way, those vaccines are great. I love those vaccines. They save the world, right? No, actually not. But before we leave Nathan, you know, I thought this was relevant. As I looked up the clip about Nathan, Martin Short's Nathan, I had forgotten that Nathan had been interviewed on Saturday Night Live by RFK Jr. about 13 years ago. And, you know, as we look at this, I understand that, you know,

RFK Jr. is talking about ending the war. He's talking about corporate cronyism and the rest of this stuff. But look, maybe if they can scare us into giving up our homes, our food, our transportation, our energy, all of our life, and locking us down with the climate MacGuffin, then maybe they won't have to have a nuclear war, right? Or maybe they'll do it anyway, because if you understand, which RFK Jr. does not, if you understand what is the essence of this climate fraud, the essence of it is depopulation. The same thing they're doing with the vaccine.

They want to kill us all. They want to sterilize us. They want to cripple us. And if they can do that with a vaccine, fine. If they can do it by scaring us into hiding and forcibly taking this stuff away by using the APA and this emission nonsense, they'll do it that way. But then of course, they may also unleash a nuclear war on us just to, you know, achieve their goal of depopulation. Because when you look at Paul Ehrlich, this guy who started the Earth Day nonsense, his book was a population bomb.

The Green MacGuffin, the Green Agenda, UN 2030, all of this stuff has always been about depopulation, that kind of population control, butulation, that kind of population control, but also about the kind of population control that controls every aspect of those people who are still alive. And so I want to play a little bit of this RFK Jr. interviewing Nathan. This is a little over 13 years old. The 2,000 top scientists from 100 nations around the world have now declared the international consensus that global warming exists, that we are causing it,

and that the impacts are going to be catastrophic. It's science. What are you saying? Did you know that since 1988, we've had the nine hottest years on record? I know that. You don't think I know that? I represent the oil companies. I would be very aware of that. Did you know that your oil industry clients receive $65 billion a year

in taxpayer-funded subsidies from our federal government? Of course I know that. But we give a lot of that money back to congressmen and to the White House. You know, scientists are predicting, this year for the first time, that the East Antarctic ice sheet and the Greenland ice sheet may break off. If that happens, Mr. Thurm, Manhattan Island will be under 12 feet of water. I mean, listen, I like Manhattan, but it's filthy. It's a filthy city.

I don't think we can deny that with a severe rat problem. Also, the theater scene in Manhattan is far from superb. Endless musicals. Most men don't like musicals. Bobby. England's top scientist, Dr. David King, has recently said that global warming poses a greater threat to national security and to international stability than terrorism well he would say that he's a

scientist well it's your company yeah you get the idea right it's all science you notice how in this interview rfk jr sounds like like Fauci talking about COVID and the pandemic. The same thing, same stuff. And he really hasn't changed. Somebody sent me an interview that he gave, and she actually asked him. I think it's Kim Iverson was the interviewer. I'm not familiar with her. But she actually asked him about his position on the environment and on climate change and stuff like that.

She didn't press him. She just asked him what his current position was on it. And he said, well, I think that it is. He says everywhere you see pollution, he focused on pollution. He avoided the climate change stuff that he's been willing to put people in jail. If you deny climate change, man-made climate change, then, you know, you should go to jail. And she didn't ask him about that. But he said that if you look at what is happening with the quote unquote

pollution and the climate stuff, he says, this is all about subsidies. And that's what he was saying right there. I don't really think he's changed. He's saying, you know, the oil companies get $65 billion worth of subsidies. Look, government is handing out money to everybody. Every industry has corporations that are getting subsidized about everything. And, um, yeah, I'm fine removing big oil subsidies. Uh, but you know, that's, it's government is always the, the hand that, um, um, it gives you the money in one pocket and takes it out with the other one.

And the big part of these subsidies is to make sure that, uh, you know, they, they take it out of the industry with regulations and taxes and other things like that, and then they'll give it to certain of their friends in the same industry so that their friends can survive in that industry. Now, what RFK Jr. does not talk about is all the subsidies that are given to windmills and to solar power and all the rest of the stuff happening at the state level as well as the federal level. Anyway, I just wanted to put that in there because you have to understand that it is two sides of the same coin,

right? If you will. I love this coin that Jason Barker did anyway. Um, the, uh, David Knight show coin, but it's two sides of the same coin.

Whether you're talking about the pandemic MacGuffin or the planetary climate change MacGuffin. That's how they're using it. So I don't know that he's changed. I mean, we do see people who have changed. Naomi Wolf, for example, has changed quite a bit. And, you know, RFK Jr. was invited to speak at Hillsdale College, a conservative college, but they're open to all points of view and everything. So they had him give a speech there. They had Naomi Wolf give a speech there.

She used to be a radical leftist Democrat, a real radical feminist. But she has now gotten very involved with research and opposing this Trump shot, this genetic code injection. She spoke at Hillsdale College and she said the greatest crime against humanity in history. That's what has happened with the Pfizer vaccine. I absolutely agree. that's why I say Trump, Fauci, Biden, all these guys should be taken in handcuffs to some modern version of the Nuremberg trials. Crimes against humanity is really what it is. She presented how the COVID vaccine, quote unquote,

vaccine enterprise intentionally sought to not only disrupt and impair human reproduction, but attack and kill large numbers of people, particularly in the West. You see, it's about depopulation. And isn't it interesting that she's talking about disruption? Disruption. What was it that Fauci said? Yeah. How do we get people to take this vaccine in the first place?

Well, we do it from the inside. We do it with disruption. We do it iteratively. And that's what they're doing with this depopulation agenda. They're doing it with disruption, physical disruption, societal disruption, economic disruption. They're doing it as an inside job. And they're still doing it, still doing it iteratively. So, again, she was at Hillsdale college, lifelong Democrat.

Uh, she has worked with Steve Bannon who I'm not a fan of. I don't trust Bennett at all, but I think she's done some good work with this. Sure. They recruited 3,500 science and medical experts to help analyze tens of thousands of documents that Pfizer submitted to the FDA for use in evaluating the safety and the effectiveness of their COVID injectables. Remember, this is the stuff that the FDA and Pfizer wanted hidden for at least 65

years. And it is a mountain of data. Judge said, no, you've got to turn it over. And so even, you know, one of the things that I say about these people like Bannon, how in the world can Bannon be working with this, like so many of these people who are against the vaccine?

But then he's all Trump, he's all MAGA, and all the rest of this stuff, right? These people are for sale. Anyway, Naomi Wolf, I think is uh the real deal she said these 3 500 recruited experts were divided into six working groups with committees at the head of them to analyze the documents to create reports that would be accessible and understandable by the public regarding these dozens of reports she apologized in advance for having to share these Pfizer documents that she said quote contain evidence of the greatest crime against humanity in the history of our species and she came up with 11 points I'm not going to get into the

details of these because the headlines are pretty self-explanatory, but she backed it up. But let me just give you the 11 points. Number one, Pfizer knew their gene-based injections had negative efficacy as early as November 2020. November 2020. Well, that means that Trump should have known. The FDA knew. well that means that trump should have known the fda knew that's when trump is leaning on these people to approve it as fast as possible right yeah trump loved uh tony fauci and he loved the vaccine pushed them like they've never been pushed before he did and that's why we have

it greatest achievements was getting the vaccine done in nine months instead of five and a half to 12 years. Yeah, who needs to have a test? Who needs to know if it works or if it's safe? Anyway, number two, shortly after release of the COVID injections on the market, Pfizer moved to hire 2,400 full-time employees to process the paperwork of the injured. I've reported on both of these things in the past. But again, let's just go through all the different points. Number three, Pfizer and the FDA withheld information that the shots cause heart damage in youth for four months, while an aggressive propaganda campaign drove many thousands to

get injected. I remember when they rolled out the Johnson and Johnson thing. And, uh, as soon as they started injecting people, they had, um, four dozen sites and four different States. Um, I'm sorry, uh, four, four sites in four different States where they had four dozen people who were instantly passed out with it. We already had a lot of information about, um, blood clots. And so what they did was as soon as all these people are instantly passing

out, when they got the job, you know, four dozen people to take people's attention away from that. They said, well, out of an abundance of caution, we're going to suspend this and we're going to investigate the blood clots. They came back and they said, well, we found that there's only six people out of six million or whatever. You got a one in a million shot of this happening to you. And they're all women and there's only six of them and it's only one in a million shots. So we're going to start it up again.

Completely covered up the people who are passing out. Completely lied about that because already at that point in time in the VAERS database, there were over 800 people who had had blood clot issues from that vaccine. So all of this stuff has been a lie, and they have used every trick in the book, every propaganda technique, and they have paid off everybody to lie. Number four, rather than staying in the injection site,

Pfizer knew the shots dangerous lipid nanoparticles quickly distribute throughout the body, and there is no evidence that they ever leave. That biodistribution was exposed by canadian doctor met watch he was based on japanese research and when he talked about the japanese research they canceled him you know they kicked him out came after him for talking about that number five i don't say it lightly, but this is mass murder, said Naomi Wolf. Side effects in the Pfizer documents far more severe than CDC and doctors told patients. And to elaborate on this, because I think this does need to be elaborated on,

she said 42,000 adverse events, including 1,200 deaths in just the first three months due to what she describes as a catastrophic categories of side effects that go far beyond typical warnings given by public health authorities. And again, this is, it's not even in the first three months. We knew it immediately. immediately that's why it got me so nauseated to see that trump sycophant mark levin talking and i talked about the article um you know there in january of 2021 mr trump you should be getting a ticker tape parade you develop this vaccine it's a moonshot and all the rest of this stuff okay and he's still slathering across the floor licking the boot of donald trump this last week just disgusting he knew that there's no excuse for him not knowing that you think i don't know that funny you would say that right uh he knew all of that stuff. And yet he chose to throw people under the bus and go political because it built his audience and gives him access to this celebrity.

Naomi Wolf said, these are not the same side effects of the CDC tells you this hell you that's things like fatigue and chills and swelling at the site of an injection. No, she said, these are strokes, hemorrhages, blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, neurological disorders, dementia-type disorders, Guillain-Barre, Bell's palsy, and more. Number six, prior to being legal, more than 1,000 children were injected,

and Pfizer's documents indicate a high rate of serious injury. Full speed ahead. Trump wants it. The FDA wants it. And Pfizer wants it. Let's pretend this stuff doesn't exist. Number seven, Pfizer documents reveal a minglet type experiment on how to disrupt and impair human reproduction. Do you think it's any coincidence that Dr. Michael Yadin,

at the very, very beginning of this, even before really getting in any data on the VAERS stuff, from the very beginning, he said, this is about mass sterilization. He'd been on the inside in Pfizer. I think he had picked that up. So this is about mass sterilization. Available records of study participants who conceive children show 80 of them lost their babies lost their babies

uh 80 number eight pfizer knew that there was a danger to fertility. The lipid nanoparticles damaged the placenta during pregnancy, causing early deliveries. Lots of chromosomal abnormalities as well. Perhaps that's why they are doing the Down Syndrome Barbie. Let's just normalize it.

Maybe we can have a ADHD Barbie or a Barbie with autism or whatever. Let's just forget about where it came from. Let's just normalize it. Number 10, it's Nazi medicine, she said. It is a war on women's fertility. Pfizer documents show three to one of AEs sustained by women, 16% reproductive disorders. So what kind of monsters look at 16% reproductive disorders and keep going?

The results, a 13 to 20% drop in live births that we have seen around the world from the Trump shot sent around the world. And the final one here, number 11. LPNs degraded the basic factories, that's the lipid nanoparticles, degraded the basic factories of masculinity in boys' testes in utero when their mother had been injected. So we're sterilizing the next generation. Isn't it amazing?

It's a full-spectrum thing. When you look at the LGBT agenda, when you look at the overt chemical and mutilation and surgical mutilation that is happening to both boys and girls. Uh, and then it goes to this vaccine as well. So it's societal mental sterilization, um, weaponize, you know, first they would tell women, you don't want to have kids. And if you do have kids, wait till really late in life when it's going to be really difficult.

Uh, you want to have a career. You don't want to have a family. Now they're going to, you don't even want to have a heterosexual relationship. And Oh, by the way, we've also got things to chemically sterilize you that you don't understand in the food and the drugs. And if that doesn't work enough, we will gaslight you mentally to at at a very young age, to mutilate and sterilize you chemically and surgically. I was just telling Karen the other day, I said, yeah, you remember, you know, Dr. Dean Adele was one of the pioneers in talk radio. One of the first people to get, you know, a large network of radio stations.

He was there even before rush limbaugh was and so we'd be in the car a lot with the work that we did and we would listen to him and he was interesting to listen to but he had a hobby horse about circumcision he was jewish and he hated it for whatever reason he was always honest like what's the big deal about that you know you do it or you don't do it it's your option but it ain't going to hurt anybody. Female circumcision then became a thing because of Islam and things that they were doing to people. Well, that did have real consequences for people.

But I was telling her, I said, you know, you haven't heard anybody complaining about male or female circumcision lately. Instead, it's a good thing. Yeah. Just completely remove the genitals. How about that? It's kind of like Paul writing to the one church. You want to argue about circumcision?

Well, just cut it off. That's what they're doing now. And you don't hear anybody complaining at all about the other stuff. Anyway, she said it showed the basic factories of these lipid nanoparticles attacked the boys' testes when their mothers had been injected. She said, so these are monsters. And there is no way to avoid concluding that they're focused on disrupting human reproduction the pandemic mcguffin was about population control just like the green agenda

is about population control and of course both of them want to know where you are, lock down everything that you do, monitor everything that you do, prohibit everything that you would like to do as well. We are under attack with a bioweapon. She said it is a mass murder situation, a war, a war crime, and crimes against humanity. But Trump is so proud of all this stuff. He's the vaccine man.

She explained how Chinese Communist Party-affiliated company called Fosun Pharmaceutical plays a significant role in developing and distributing the Pfizer biological warfare agents marketed as COVID-19 vaccines. She explained that the Chinese communist party owns the manufacturing plants producing the injection that goes into the bodies of school children here in the U S further house studies overseen by the CCP reveal that they knew full well that lipid nanoparticle damage fertility and cause myocarditis.

She said to me it's obvious to show that the chinese communist party how you kill westerners without leaving fingerprints she emphasized that they focus on asymmetric warfare things that degrade and demoralize the enemy rather than having a lot of war with shooting so i guess we were we were owned by china in a very different way right how do they want to make this they want to make it about the bioweapon lab the bioweapon is the injection the injection is a sterilizing bioweapon and a weapon to kill people. It's amazing to me how they will twist and spin this and how they're still doing it. And I thought it was also interesting to see the transformation in Naomi Wolf. This is why I talked about Tucker Carlson.

Look, I know where Tucker Carlson is coming from. I know that he is always, you know, as Kurt Nemo, somebody sent me a Kurt Nemo article, said Tucker Carlson is a trust fund baby and a CIA wannabe. Well, that's right. He even called himself a trust fund baby. And we know that he tried to get in the CIA. We know that his family's involved in the CIA.

I'm hopeful, based on some of the comments that he made again to Hillsdale. No, actually he was talking to heritage. She was talking to Hillsdale. Um, I'm, I'm hopeful in some of the comments that he made to heritage that, uh, perhaps he is looking at the bigger picture who knows because Naomi Wolf, was a radical Democrat, a radical feminist pushing the LGBT agenda. And this has been a wake-up call for her, this evil that she has seen. She's Jewish, and she says,

well, you know, I've been reading the Bible a lot more lately. She said, I feel the world is facing, quote, a biblical moment where humanity is being asked to choose. She said, I've been reading the Bible a lot these days. She said, what we see here is this abyss of human evil every single day over the past few years. Tell me about it. Now, I've got a front row seat on this.

You have to look at the bigger picture. You have to look at God, or you have to walk away from this stuff and just try to drive it out. No, you don't want to walk away from this. Don't hide yourself from this. Steal yourself against this with God's word, with the fact that God is in charge, that justice will eventually be done,

even though these people prosper and they're evil. Now it is just for a time. So she said, I know that it sounds paradoxical, but I felt like this evil overtook the world in lockstep, in perfect unison, in a way that I could not explain using my critical thinking. There was something metaphysical about what was happening. See, she's starting to get it. You know, the people who are behind this, it's not ultimately, you know, the person in charge, it's everybody. Who is it? You know, is it the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds? Is it Soros? Is it the UN? Is it Davos and Klaus Schwab?

Is it Bill Gates? And on and on and on. Everybody's, you know, got these people. It's like, well, yeah, they're part of it. Who's the mastermind? The mastermind is metaphysical. The mastermind is supernatural. The conspiracy is satanic. And it's been going on since God created man. A conspiracy to destroy mankind. A conspiracy to cut us off. To destroy humanity off the face of the earth.

It is a satanic conspiracy. So she's Jewish. She said, a lot of days I've been looking at the promise that God gave in 2 Chronicles. If my people will humble themselves and pray and seek my face, I'll forgive their sins and heal my land. That's true. That is where we are. It's good to see some people who are waking up to this,

having an epiphany about what is happening. So we're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, I've got a couple more things to say about Pfizer. Well, actually, let me say it before we go to break, because it's just a couple of things and we'll change topic. And I do have something I want to say about the election and about the announcements of Biden. He made some incredible announcements.

So real quickly, just these two topics here. They found that Pfizer was giving money to several groups who are pushing vaccine passports and mandates. They're being quietly funded by Pfizer. They did not declare that they were getting money from Pfizer, but they were shilling for them. One of them was an organization, the Chicago urban league, Karen Freeman, Wilson, and an August, 2021, what was happening though? Well, that was right there where the cusp of we're going to mandate these things. We're going to have the FDA put a rubber stamp on it.

You know, Fauci's like, well, I don't know, you know, they got to prove it, but I think it's going to happen. Yeah. It's going to no chance. It's't know. You know, they got to prove it, but I think it's going to happen. Yeah. It's going to no chance. It's not going to, they're not going to prove it. So, you know,

they go through and they go through the emotions of, um, pretending that they have now approved it, even though they don't approve anything that's legally available, that's available in the U S they said it's legally distinct, but it's the same thing. So we're going to prove it that way. Uh,

so that was happening. The talk of the vaccine passports and mandates was happening you know that was when you had a lot of uh um people like todd freal and franklin graham and al moore saying yeah you just do whatever government tells you to do because that's how you love your neighbor and you get the vaccine and you put the pinwheels on your head and all the rest of this stuff so So, uh, in August of 2021, the Chicago urban league was telling everybody, you know, Hey, um, you don't have to worry about this. It's not going to harm the black community. There are a lot of people in the black community concerned about it because they've already seen how they

had been experimented on the Tuskegee experiments how big pharmaceutical companies and uh you know government affiliated organizations were experimenting on people in africa on things like this so they're very reluctant uh the chicago urban league had received a hundred thousand dollars from pfizer uh for a project to promote vaccine safety and effectiveness but they did not list them as a donor on their website. They did it quietly, you know, and then you had another one,

corporate watchdog group, the national consumer league. This is, you're talking about regulatory capture. They don't just capture the FDA. They capture consumer groups. They're supposed to warn you about what is happening with corporations. So Pfizer paid off that group. Just like they bought the news media back in the 90s.

Ask your doctor commercial. They bought Fox, CNN, all the rest of them. Corporate watchdog group, the National Consumers League, announced support for government and employer mandate in August of 2021. So, you know, pay up and then they get this. They got $75,000. So the Urban League gets $100,000 and she stabs her fellow citizens in the black community in the back. These people who are a consumer watchdog group for $75,000, they will tell you,

oh, yeah, we've vetted this, and this is good stuff. You should get it. And then another one, $35,000 for a Houston-based public health organization, the Immunization Partnership, publicly lobbied against bills introduced in Texas to ban vaccine passports and vaccine mandates. So, you know, they've all got their price, don't they? It could be 30 pieces of silver. It could be $35,000 that they get.

And so the good news about this is we've now got a blowback. We now have the dreaded vaccine hesitancy that Rand Paul criticized Fauci for. You know, you're pushing this stuff, and you're going to create vaccine hesitancy. People aren't going to take the regular vaccines. It's like, good, and that's what's happening right now. A federal judge has ruled that Mississippi must allow religious exemptions for school vaccines. Remember that? Hey, they got to get the shot.

This thing is going, this measles stuff, it's going around, right? Well, people are starting to push back on that. Now, it's just this last article before we go to break. This is one that I saw, I think, Guard Goldsmith put this up on Twitter. I saw it, retweeted it. It was a flashback to April 1st, 2020, two weeks after the lockdown, essentially. You know, we're in lockdown on the 13th.

This is the first. And in this article, where Gard covered it, the arrest of a pastor for violation of pandemic order begs the question, do we answer to God or to government? Monday, March 30th, Florida police arrested a Tampa-based pastor for violating Republican Governor DeSantis' order, his safer-at-home order, casting into view one of the most important and profound questions of our or any time. To whom does one ultimately answer?

To God or to the state? God or governor? Governor DeSantis. And again, he's pulled back from some of this stuff. I've always said it's too little, too late, but it's still more than any of the other governors did. So that's where this is. It's what it is.

I wish he had done more. I wish he had never done this. There's a lot of pastors who have said, I wish I'd never shut down. I was fooled. So anybody can be fooled. Eventually, he did the right thing. Not all the right things. He didn't go far enough.

It was a measured response, but he did do more than all the rest. So that's where it is. But again, he was arrested for violating DeSantis' Safer at Home, and this is Pastor Rodney Howard Brown. He turned himself into authorities charged with unlawful assembly, violation of public health emergency order. Bail was set at $500, arrested in Florida because of Governor DeSantis' order. Not only did the church comply with the administrative order, he said, regarding six-foot distancing, it went above and beyond any other business to ensure the health and safety of

the people, said a statement from the people defending him, Liberty Council. Contrary to Sheriff Chronister's allegation that Pastor Howard Brown was reckless, the actions of Hillsborough County and the Hernando County Sheriff are discriminatory against religion and church gatherings. And at the time, Guard Goldsmith had this comment. He said, first of all, the U..s constitution does not grant the president any power remotely akin to ordering people to not congregate or forcing them to stay in their homes

he says now president trump has not made this order but you know trump uh they recommended it right and then they gave money to people if they would do it. And he said, secondly, the governor's order, like that of many other chief executives of various states, is highly questionable on constitutional grounds. Not only does the First Amendment supposedly protect the right of worship, it also protects the right to assemble on public property. And this church is not even public property. So Gard was right at the very beginning, even if DeSantis wasn't. And, um, so, you know, I trust guard Goldsmith.

I don't trust DeSantis. Uh, it's great. We'll, we'll say, you know, when he does a little bit of the right thing, we'll encourage him to do more of the right thing. Uh, but just understand, um, I guess we could say in guard, we trust, but, uh, we'll be right back. Terima kasih telah menonton! you're listening to the david knight show well i talked the other day about biden's new rules and of course in just the last couple weeks he's used the epa as a weapon to by raising standards for automobiles internal combustion engines so high that it is a de facto ban in just a few years.

And then they followed that up by putting emission standards on power plants that they have never done before. And they'll wind up closing most of these power plants. They give them an out and they say, well, you know, it's a, we're not closing these plants. If they want to, they can go through this carbon recapture thing, and they can grab CO2 that the plants need. They can take that out of the atmosphere, and they can compress it, store it underground, or ship it to somebody if they can figure out

what they want to do with it and so forth. It's incredibly expensive, whether you're building a new power plant or you're trying to retrofit it. So most of them will just close instead of doing this. And they'll say, well, hey, you know, that's it. They've said that in the past. Well, of course, you know, you can build this or you can do that. It's just that it'll bankrupt you if you do.

That's how they operate through the regulations. And so he wants to, you know, shut down internal combustion engines. So we'll get an electric vehicle. Well, guess what? He wants to shut down internal combustion engines. So, okay, we'll get an electric vehicle. Well, guess what? He wants to shut down the power plants as well. It is a complete shutdown. They want to destroy everything.

The Biden administration set a target of a net zero economy by 2050. Reportedly pushed between 30 to 60 gigawatts worth of coal-fired power offline by 2030, just seven years from now. And what they mean by a zero economy is they want to destroy everything. They want you to have zero energy, zero travel, zero food, zero building, zero pollution, right? That's how they get there. Zero population is what they really want. And that's why I say this is what is going to... RFK Jr., talking about these other issues that he's good on, would get us there in the

same way. And he would probably be more effective at pushing the lie than Biden is. That's the dangerous thing about it. I'm glad that he's there to talk about what's happening with the vaccine stuff, but he is not telling people the truth about the climate. And that pandemic, that MacGuffin, is every bit as dangerous as any of these things. Before I go on to Biden's comments as he kicked off his campaign this week, I want to thank David Blackburn on Rockfin.

Thank you for the tip on Rockfin. I got a comment from John Henry 3777. A friend was telling me her daughter got the vax and now she cannot get pregnant. Yeah, I'm sad about that, but that's not surprising. Rockfin Handy says, I have at least one co-worker whose girlfriend miscarried and now can't get pregnant after the jab. Yeah, they are doing so many different things, but this is the biggest single move that they have made against us. Again, it's societal, psychological, uh, you know, taking away the aspiration to even have a family. You don't want to be locked down with kids. Let me tell you, you do, you do. Uh, anybody who has been a homeschool will tell you that's the

best time of their life in retrospect you want to be locked down with the kids and not locked down but you you know you want to you want to have um you do want to have a family i highly recommend it but they're doing everything they can to keep that from happening and uh biden as he was holding a Rose garden ceremony to honor a teacher of the year, she's both a state and national teacher of the year. And as part of that, he goes back into this, who does the, who the kids belong to this person that he was honoring there in the ceremony, uh, was Oklahoma teacher, Rebecca Peterson,

winner of the 2023 National and State Teachers of the Year Award. Biden celebrated her and other teachers and administrators for their contributions. And then he also called for increased gun control. But what he had to say, they got everybody upset. I'll play you the clip and then we'll talk about it. Rebecca put a teacher's creed into words when she said, there's no such thing as someone else's child. No such thing as someone else's child.

Our nation's children are all our children. We got to get over this notion that the children belong to you. You know, they belong to the the village Melissa Harris Perry said that it was a public service announcement that was running on forgets MSNBC or CNN Hillary Clinton it takes a village to raise a child it takes a government school system to raise the kind of children that we want and we got to understand that our nation's children are all of our children. No, they're not. No, they're not.

That is as much of a fantasy as these genital fantasies that you've gotten. These gender fantasies that you're getting. The kids do not belong to you. That's the big fight. That has been one of the hallmarks of tyranny for the longest time. A great quote from RFK Jr. He said, never in history have the good guys, have good guys trying to shut up people's speech.

I guess he needs to go back and talk about what he was saying 10, 15 years ago, where he wanted to silence people and lock them up for speech that he didn't agree with. Oh, it was settled science, right? Science has never settled. And the bad guys want to lock people up, want to silence people. So he needs to talk about that. But again, the president said that Peterson put out and put a teacher's creed into words. He said, there's no such thing as someone else's child.

Well, I would say that, uh, as he's honoring the school teachers, this is the majority opinion in the schools. That's one of the reasons why we got to get rid of the schools. We've got to get rid of the schools and we've got to keep the guns. You know, he's saying, Hey, we're going to take over your kids. Your kids belong to us. All your kids belong to us and we're going to get rid of the guns as well. No, get rid of the schools.

Keep the guns. America was a much better place when there were no government schools and everybody had guns. Yeah, that was a much better place. People forget what a recent invention government-run schools are. It's an abomination, frankly. There was a few states up in the northeast that started that as an experiment about the middle of the

1800s. And it really didn't take off until the early 20th century. And even then, it was closely controlled by parents, typically a one-room school room. They weren't rigidly segregated by age like they are now and many of the other things that we do. And when everybody in America had guns and we didn't have any government schools, they weren't deliberately dumbing down the kids. Education wasn't institutionalized.

People were free to defend themselves. The purpose of schools has always been to manipulate people. And that's true when it was run by conservatives as well. It is, they should be opposed for the same reason we don't want to have an established religion because education is fundamentally about religion and worldviews. And we should not have that being dictated

in a centralized way by the government. If you look at the textbooks that are coming out, they are all about censorship, all this stuff about, you're banning books and this and that. Look, if you're going to educate your kids or yourself, go back to the original sources. It has always been a hallmark of dictators to try to take kids away from the parents going back to

plato's republic they want to have a situation where nobody even knew who their parents were you know have these type of pagan ceremonies you know the holidays bacchanalia and all the rest of the stuff like i was talking about uh with the Asherah festivals. Nobody knows who their kids are. And then they would see the state as their family, as their only family. That was Plato's ideal. And then they would sort out who the people were going to be in terms of the different caste, different strata levels of society.

And when you look at Aldous Huxley, he made it more scientific. Oh, let's have artificial wombs and hatcheries and we can manipulate the babies. We can make some of them smarter than average and we can dumb others down and we'll know right away where they're going to be an alpha, beta, gamma, delta, or an epsilon. Prominent parents' rights group, Moms for Liberty, responded, said we do not co-parent with the government.

Well, let me just tell you, if you put your kids in school, you are co-parenting with the government, and you are a silent partner in that. You may go to these school board meetings and speak up and yell and scream, and they'll call you an extremist and all the rest of the stuff. You're not going to have any effect on that. You're pushing on a rope. Because even if you change the school board,

even if you change the school administration in your school, it's going to be the individual classroom teachers who are going to do as they wish. And you don't know who they are. And they're not doing the Zoom classes anymore. As parents nationwide participate in a surge of grassroots involvement in school boards pushing back against this far left congresswoman aoc occasional cortex recently accused conservatives of fascism for seeking to control their children's education this is how far it's gone.

We need to shut these things down. As I said yesterday, you want to talk about putting the Ten Commandments up? What about number six, thou shalt not steal? These things are founded on theft. And if you're going to steal money from people to run these government schools, you can't do good by doing evil first. It's just that simple. It's not 40 chess, no such thing.

So your kids belong to the government schools and they belong to Disney. I guess they've got kind of joint custody of them. So that was Biden's little contribution this week. He didn't have a big speech where he went out and talked about his candidacy and said, he's got a quiet Rose Garden thing where he talks about how your kids are going to belong to him. And the LGBT stuff has been dear to his heart and top of his agenda from the very beginning. You have Lala Harris coming out and talking about the FDA, except she doesn't know even what the FDA is about.

Listen to this. Which was approved 20 years ago by the Federal Drug Administration. The Federal Drug Administration. No, it's the Food and Drug Administration. So what was that that was approved? Mephistoprine or whatever. I'll call it just Mepistopheles i think that's the right way to approach this this uh yet another way to uh control population and perhaps you can

get a twofer there you know just like with a vaccine you might be able to kill the mother and the baby at the very least you can steril mother with that. Well, with this abortion pill, if they haven't had an examination, that baby may be big enough. That's kind of cause tremendous health problems for the mother. I may wind up sterilizing them from having any future kids may wind up killing them. Who cares? I mean, this is a women's health that we're talking about, right? And we don't need to have any exams.

That's what's changed. She says, well, this was approved 20 years ago, but it has to be done under doctor's supervision. You don't care about women's health. If you're going to remove that doctor's supervision, she said, let's set the scene, the highest court in our land. The Supreme court took a constitutional right that had been recognized from the people of America.

No, what they did was they changed their opinion. Supreme Court opinions are just that, their opinions. They don't amend the Constitution. Take a look at it, Vice President, what you swore to. Is anywhere in there do you see that the process of amending the Constitution is to take a case to the Supreme Court, but we pretend that's the case. She said, um, women of America have a right to make a decision about your own body and your own reproductive health.

Oh, really? What about the jab? You're pushing that jab. I'm so sick of this. My body, my choice stuff. They didn't want you to have a choice about your body or your baby's body. If you're pregnant, you had to get the jab. No exceptions.

And this is not your body. But they had health mandates, mandates of every kind, all over the place. She said, it's politicians who are finding a court, targeting a specific court that they thought would be helpful to them to take a medication off of the market, which was approved 20 years ago by the Federal Drug Administration. No, it's the Food and Drug Administration. So, okay. They're not taking it off the market. What they're saying is, you can't, they always misrepresent the issue here right this is not when we talk about the things that are being done in terms of trying to protect kids

from pornography and classrooms and libraries oh you're banning books and when you talk about this we're not talking about taking that, we're not talking about taking that away. We're not talking about doing anything to the behavior of adults except to say you're going to keep your sexual behavior away from kids. That's what we're talking about with these drag queens. But they always present it as if this is going to be shutting down the groomers when they don't have any kids around. No, we're just trying to get the kids away from the groomers when they don't have any kids around. No, we're just trying to get the kids away from the groomers. They can have their little religious rights wherever they want to,

but they can't have kids around. And with this, oh, you're taking away a drug. No, not taking away. You're saying you got to have an examination. Got to have an examination. So you're not going to be able to send it anonymously through the mail to people who have not had an examination. Got to have an examination. So you're not going to be able to send it anonymously through the mail to people who have not had an examination. And you would support that as well

if you really supported women's health. But you're going to take away a drug that was approved 20 years ago. How about ivermectin? That was approved in 1987, 36 years ago. They wanted to take that away. It was being used off-label, but it had a very long safety profile, far safer than this abortion pill, far, far safer. Or how about hydroxychloroquine, HCQ? That was developed in 1955, 68 years ago. They wanted to take that away from everybody,

pretend that it wasn't safe, and so forth. On Rockfin, thank you very much. Duke, I appreciate that. And on Rockfin, Audi MRR, thank you so much. That's Modern Retro Radio. Thank you for the tip. He says, hi, David and DK family. I've said it before, thank you for the tip. He says, hi, David and DK family. I've said it before.

I'll say it again. Home schooling has increased by over one third this past year for a reason. The trend will likely increase. I hope it does. I want to do everything I can to increase that trend. I want to do everything I can to get people to understand that you do not want to co-parent with a school and you're going to be a silent partner, a minor partner, and that they're going to have the kids most of the day. You're not going to know what is happening there, regardless of what happens at the state, the county, or even the school administration level. You're not going to know what's happening in that classroom because you're not there. Um, my, my, uh, prep restone, I think is the way they pronounce this thing, but I just call it Mephistopheles arguably what they're doing with this. She said could happen to any of those drugs in your medicine cabinet.

Well, Lala was celebrating the banning of drugs. You know, this is, um, a pandemic and you don't want people to be able to try this stuff. But now she's pushing drugs that are designed to kill a baby and are also very dangerous to women, may sterilize them, but she wants that out without any examination for the women. We'll be right back. ¶¶ Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move.

And now, The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. We have big money donors rallying behind Biden as he launches his re-election bid, says CNBC. They're very excited about this. Big money, big corporations, like Biden. And I said executive spanning from tech to media to finance. Oh, okay. So big banks, big tech, big media, mainstream media.

They love Biden. I think we already know that. Uh, CNBC is exhibit a in that, right? They made it clear publicly and behind the scenes that they are ready to help Biden overcome his soft approval ratings and defend off heated Republican challenge. And they will lie up one side down the other. They will censor people and they will flood him with cash.

Several big Republican donors, meanwhile, have been scrambling to find an alternative to Trump. And when they look at governor DeSantis, some of those same donors have quietly started to look at other at governor DeSantis, some of those same donors have quietly started to look at other options besides DeSantis as he continues his battle with Disney. Because again, Disgay is much worse than Bud Light. Why is it the people, you know, we haven't seen that kind of pushback.

It has been a big drop off in Disney Plus when they put out programs like The Proud Family, these angry Marxist radical kids modeling that for children. How is in the world is that entertainment? Why would people pay to have that garbage pumped in? Maybe they just set up a Karl Marx channel or something. Call it Marxist Plus. Yeah, I can pay for the cable channel that will put the noose around my own neck here, right? So it's not just Biden cozying up to these people.

It's also President Trump. And so LifeSite News says, what is behind Trump's sudden move to the left well he was always there this is a guy he's always been a lifelong democrat from new york uh but they have also pointed this out they pointed out that as biden was signing his bill saying we're going to redefine marriage and this is how we're going to define it trump was having a big festival for lgbt at mar-a-lago of course they pushed their diversity inclusivity equity credentials they pushed that before the 2020 election

you know melania was cutting commercials for the LGBT. Statistical analysis shows in 2022, Trump's endorsement cost candidates between 5% and 7% in competitive races. That gap has persisted in polls with Trump's likely primary opponent, DeSantis, running about 6% ahead of Trump. It is due to Trump's very low, under 40% favorability rating and his extremely high, unfavorable rating of 57%, including 50% who have a very unfavorable view.

This is, again, one thing I agree with Chris Christie on. I'm not a fan of Chris Christie, but I think he's right. I think pretty much any Republican Republicans got a really good chance of beating Biden, except for Trump. For those reasons, he is so strongly disliked by independents and Democrats. He's not going to win any of them over. For his part, Trump blames Republicans poor 2020 midterm performance on social conservatives. Not the candidates that he picked to had no principles. Right.

And January, the first truth social post Trump said, it wasn't my fault. The Republicans didn't live up to the expectations in midterms. It was the abortion issue poorly handled by many Republicans, especially those that firmly insisted on no exceptions. Even in the case of rape, he says. Well, is it really that hard to defend life? I mean, I can do it with a single picture. You know, baby Samuel.

It's not hard to defend life. But, you know, when I talked about this the other day, and I talked about Matt Drudge wanting to get off, I mentioned that because that's where Fox News has always been. Fox News in 1991, 1999 rather, did not want this picture on. And this was so offensive to Rupert Murdoch and the population control cabal that owns that network that they kicked him off. So that's a violation of contract, kicked him off

because he put this picture up. He knew that, that's why he put it up. He wanted to get out of his contract. But they hated that picture because this picture says it all. It speaks volumes, doesn't it it so you don't have to defend the truth you have to let it loose and they want to keep it under wraps they don't want you to see pictures of the babies that have been aborted they don't want you to see the pictures of the babies that are alive it's very easy to defend life but Trump doesn't want to do it.

And it's those people who say no exceptions. You know, a baby like this, I just showed you, you know, you should be able to kill that baby. You should be able to chop it up, poison it, burn it to death, right? That's what Trump says. These crazy people who say no exceptions, they cost me voters. Trump's strategy in terms of plotting his own leftward shift, they said, of course, you know, just this last week on April the 20th, a Washington Post article, Trump's campaign ruled out any federal restrictions on abortion.

You know, they don't want to, not going to restrict people from killing that baby. Not the Trump people. A position that was immediately blasted by Susan B. Anthony, Pro-Life America, as unacceptable. I guess the question is this. If I had an interview, I said I'd love to have five minutes with President Trump.

I'd ask him, how many abortions has Trump personally paid for? Personally paid for? I bet there's a long list of them. It's paid for sex. I imagine he's paid for a lot of abortions as well. Uh, so Trump is a loud ally of Disney. The sanctus is being absolutely destroyed by Disney.

He wrote on truth show social. This is also unnecessary. It is a political stunt and Kellyanne Conway, who has prostituted herself politically for him echoed her boss. Yeah. So, um, I think one of the reasons that,

um, DeSantis did so well when all of Trump's candidates did so poorly was because he picked some of these principles and defended them to one degree or the other and ran on that record. And it was very popular. You see, it's the big donors. It's the globalist corporations that don't want this kind of stuff. It's not the public. Trump's leftward shift is not being confined to cultural war issues. He criticized DeSantis for not constructing enough public housing. He attacked DeSantis for not allowing home property values to rise, for not enacting protections against elder abuse, for not raising teacher pay. He cited a report from Disney,

Disney's owned channel ESPN, said Florida is the worst place in the country to die. Why? Well, because there's too few green burial options. Seriously? Well, you know, you could always bury somebody on Trump's golf course. That green is there available. He put his first wife there to get some kind of a tax break there, buried her on the golf course.

Was that what he had in mind as a green burial option? Can you imagine what Benedict Donald would do in a second term? This guy is a New York Democrat. You look at this laundry list here. Well, you don't have enough public housing, and you don't have enough. We need to pay teachers more. No, you need to shut teachers down.

You need to tell them to find all no you need to shut teachers down you need to tell them to find a job with a private school uh you know that's what would happen most people would put their kid in private school rather than homeschool them unfortunately uh but um in a private school there'd be more accountability peter teal one of the first people to back trump this is the top of the drudge report yesterday saying he's sick of the culture war. I bet he is. He doesn't like people looking at what the LGBT agenda is all about.

Peter Thiel, PayPal, Godfather, one of the first backers of Trump from the very beginning. And he wants to keep that all quiet. So, you know, Disney sued DeSantis yesterday. They said it is a

targeted campaign of retaliation. Uh, yeah, well, um, he came back to them and said, you have no legal right to corporate welfare. And I said, I think the only weakness that he has is some of the comments that he's made that makes it sound like he is in a personal fight with him. This is something that should have been done for the last 50 or 60 years since they opened up. I guess it's been about 50 years since they opened up and they should have never been given this kind of corporate privilege. And every Republican, Democrat and Republican that's come in, including DeSantis at the beginning, should have put an end to this, but they didn't. They didn't.

And I won't play the clip because we're going to go to Tony. But Nikki Haley wasted no time jumping on Fox News and saying, hey, if DeSantis doesn't want Disney in Florida, we'd love to have them in South Carolina. Yeah, bring them up here. They can groom our kids up here. We're going to take a break. And when we come back, we're going to be talking to Tony Arderman, uh, wise wolf dot gold. We'll be right back. The common man. They created common core and dumbed down our children. They created common past to track and control us.

Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us it's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide

please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com thank you for listening thank you for sharing if you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Welcome back and joining us on the phone is Tony Arbon. He is so busy because of what is happening with gold that he's not in the office. And so we've missed a couple of weeks because Tony has been on the road.

So we got him on the phone today. And it is kind of interesting to see what's happening. We've got record silver that is happening in terms of setting records in pretty much every category in 2022 in a report that was released this week by the Silver Institute. And so big increase in silver demand. Of course, there's industrial stuff there as well as people trying to get out of the dollar, but the big attack is coming from the dollar.

And there's a big attack on the Petro dollar as well as reserve currency. Thank you for joining us, Tony. We were just talking about a dilemma that I'd not heard of before. And you just found out about, tell people about this. You said it was kind of like Gresham's law in terms of good and you just found out about. Tell people about this. You said it was kind of like Gresham's Law in terms of good and bad currencies, but this is about what happens

with reserve currency status when that goes away. Thanks for joining us. Well, thanks for having me, David. I've been on the road. I think in the future, a precious metal dealer is going to be defined by how he can supply his customers. That's going to be the biggest key to all of this in the future. So I've been working on setting up another location in North Texas and working out new wholesale relationships, anything I can do to keep the supply rolling in. And as we see all of this de-dollarization, that's in the headlines. That's mainstream now. This is something we were talking about two or three years ago, but now mainstream's picking it up.

It's accelerating faster and faster than even I anticipated with the sanctions on Russia. I talked about this last week on your show, but 75% of all financial transactions in 2001 were done in dollars around the world. And by 2021, it was 55%. Then 2022, and into our present, it's 47% and declining rapidly with the BRICS nations. And that's something I've been looking at with the de-dollarization, but it comes back to something called Triffin's Dilemma. And it was from an economist named Robert Triffin in the 1960s, was testifying before Congress. You know, that was about the time, David, that Lyndon Johnson took the silver out of the coinage. And around 1967 was the largest order of gold by central banks up until now.

And that's when President de Gaulle of France actually sent warships over to the United States to pick up the gold. You know, they wanted their dollars repatriated in gold. And anyway, Triffin's dilemma is really what happens when you lose a reserved currency. Because in Breton Woods in 1944, they pegged the dollar to gold, $35 an ounce. It's the world's reserved currency. It's the new economic world order. It's where you get the IMF. It's born out of Breton Woods. Well, Breton Woods came to an end in 1971 when Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard.

But part of becoming the world's reserve currency, David, is basically every central bank around the world had to be given dollars. They had to stock them with dollars. And you're talking about quadrillions in numbers. So you really can't fathom how much was how many dollars were created and as we lose the world's reserve currency status and it's kind of like him hemming ways you know gradually then suddenly it it may be one of those things where we just wake up you know uh you know it usually happens on a sunday that's when nixon took us off the gold standard he interrupted uh in interrupted an episode of Bonanza.

That's enough reason right there not to vote for him. Come on, I want a hop back and a little joke. Come on. Well, ironically, too, Bonanza is about people going out west to find gold, so I thought that was even more interesting. But we've got an issue with Gresham's law. You brought that up too. Gresham's law just states that when bad money enters a system, like fiat currency, when you unpeg it from any value, when bad money enters a system, it drives good money into hiding until it doesn't, until fiat currency reaches its end, which it always does. But Triffin's dilemma is what happens, and I think we all know the answer, when you have those trillions and trillions of dollars coming back home,

coming back to our shores. That is the nightmare. And again, I don't cheerlead this at all. I hope i'm wrong i know that if we lose the reserve currency status i mean my fellow americans are going to be hurt it's going to hurt the west it's going to hurt the civilized world i mean it's really going to be a a dark time and i don't know i think they're doing it on purpose i think they're doing it on purpose i've got a headline here 30 of the world's economies are now sanctioned by the G7. I mean, they are, you know, it isn't just that we're losing reserve currency status

because we've been footloose and fancy free and spending money that we don't have and all the rest of the stuff. No, it's because we've used it as a weapon and people are running away from it. It's like, I'm not going to have my wealth taken away and confiscated or locked up or whatever by the U.S. government. I got to find some other way to do it. That's what they're doing. They know full well what they're doing they're doing it deliberately this is not an accident this wasn't a mistake they did it they're continuing to do it they want to shut down energy and they want to shut down

uh the u.s dollar that you know there you go petro and dollar they're shutting them both down well the u.s dollar the u.s economy the u.s empire itself is building seven i mean it's being brought down through a controlled demolition i i agree with you on that uh and you know they've they've rigged this you look at the sanctions on on russia they had to run simulations knowing exactly what was going to happen. And you're 100% correct. Those sanctions are a sanction on us. It hasn't hurt the Russian people. It's hurt us.

It's hurt the world economy. It's hurt the supply chain. It's hurt every aspect of our lives. It's all blowback against us, yet they double and triple and quadruple down on it. So that just goes to show you that they're not making any mistakes when it comes to hurting us and hurting the future of, of American, uh, hegemonic power that this is being brought down from the inside.

I agree with you on that. So tell us a little bit more about Triven's dilemma. Why, how does he see this playing out? You know, he says that it's going to be really bad when, you know, this,

um, we lose reserve currency status. Uh, you know, exactly says that it's going to be really bad when, you know, this, um, we lose reserve currency status, uh, you know, exactly. How does he see it unfolding? Well, I was just doing some research on it. I heard this through, uh, Robert Kiyosaki and his podcast, the rich dad, poor dad author, and I said, what is that? And I looked it up and so basically they're trying to solve Griffin's dilemma. And I don't know, you know, again, it's all theoretical. Like, what is that? And I looked it up. And so basically, they're trying to solve Griffin's dilemma. I don't know.

You know, again, it's all theoretical. Like, what are we going to do? How do you repatriate those dollars? And really what it boils down to, David, is once you become a reserve currency of the world, which has been very few. And especially, I mean, you're talking about after World War II and the aftermath of that. I mean, the United States was 5% of the world's population. We had 50% of the wealth. You know what's happened since then.

We've had our wealth and technology siphoned off through free trade agreements and policies that take our wealth and go eastward with it. It's one of the reasons why you always hear, you know, all these central banks are buying gold. They don't mention ours. They don't mention the American. So there's something wrong with that. So basically, once you, again, the dollar is fake, but it identifies as gold. It identifies as real. I think it's a trans currency in some way. But there really isn't any way out of it. I mean, if you look at the scenarios that you could run, there's really no way around it. Once you take that mantle, if you lose the reserve currency status, you're talking about a rapid, massive, catastrophic devaluation of your own currency. I don't think there's any way around that. I mean, look at

Saudi Arabia after we abandoned Afghanistan. By the way, I was all about getting out of Afghanistan. My unit was the first army company on the ground in Kandahar. So I know a thing or two about Afghanistan. I wanted to get out of Afghanistan six months into it. I was still there. I thought we should get out. But they saw that. They saw how we abandoned all of those people. They saw that, you know, we left the equipment there, just this, you know, bloated, pitiful giant that we are now being run by these globalist automatons. And they bailed. And they went and they're under the protection of Russia and China now. They've applied for the BRICS status.

I mean, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, soon to be Saudi Arabia. 60 other nations have applied for admission into BRICS. Mexico has applied for admission into BRICS. Mexico has applied for admission into BRICS. The U.S. dollar, and there's nothing you or I or pretty much anyone right now can do about it. I think that ship has sailed. The question is, what do we do to protect ourselves? What can we do in the coming economic turmoil? And it's going to be a lot of change, I wouldn't say that I'm a doom and gloom guy either. I think there can be some massive opportunity to, you know, to become more independent and to understand how the monetary system works. And

make no mistake about it, I learned something every single day about this business and about history of money. And I'm still a student, very much a student. But we are about to get a crash course in how currencies die, especially. And it's not going to go to zero. I mean, I think you and I have talked about this before. Problem, reaction, solution. Never let a good crisis go to waste. What are they going to do in the aftermath?

Well, if this is a controlled demolition, well, they're going to usher in central bank digital currency. That'll be the savior. That'll be what you need is download your wallet. Get your biometrics tied to it, all of your social security number, your driver's license, your identification card, all that, and tie that to the central bank digital currency that will be the savior of losing the reserve currency status. The United States is going to be much like Russia was at the fall of the Soviet Union. You know, still a nuclear power, still have some clout, but we're not going to be the dominant superpower anymore, David.

I mean, just like, imagine that. The World Economic Forum had that commercial, you know, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy. But if you watch the commercial back from 2015, 2016, that's the first thing it says is, imagine a world by 2030 where the United States is not the lone superpower. That's right. They've had a plan. They're carrying it out.

Part of that is the United States being moved to, again, a third-rate power. And that means the currency goes with it. And so that message to all of us and to the listeners is that you're going to have to be ready for that. The economy is not going to look like it does today, and especially your savings account. Well, I think at the federal level, it's pretty clear that they are focused and pursuing a path to deliberately destroy everything. Not just our currency, but our energy to ban cars, to ban power plants. I mean, we got the EPA as the weapon that he's using to do that kind of stuff with the climate, McGuffin. And so they're working at that. As you pointed out, everybody is running away from it.

As I just said, 30% of the world's economies are being sanctioned right now. One person said this is a defund the global police moment. So in a way, we've been the world's policemen. And so people are just going to defund that because they're sick of us being the world's policemen. And quite frankly, I'm sick of it as well. But we can't muster the political will in Washington to do anything about it. So it'll be taken away from us. I think our country is under a moral judgment as well, quite frankly, when we look at what is happening. So what do we do?

We get our lives in order, and we try to do whatever we can at the state level. We have a lot of different things that are in the works at state levels. Tennessee is working on trying to get a gold depository and a publicly owned bank that's going to try to keep up another financial system that is not totally captive to the Federal Reserve to try to keep that going so we can have a financial side to the economy that is still alive. Texas is doing some of the same stuff. Texas is talking about having a gold-backed digital currency. Zimbabwe came up with the same idea.

So there's a lot of different things that may be done at the state level, whether they can work or not, whether they'll be done at the state level, whether they can work or not, whether they'll be done quickly enough or not, but it's really up to us, right? At our local level, we're going to have to try to take preparations and protect ourselves at the local individual level. That's right. That's the answer is decentralization. I was asked on another show this last week, you know, what about Weimar Germany? What did they do during 1929 and on when they had hyperinflation? Did they just go to gold and go to silver? I said, no.

They used a host of other currencies. They had the pound sterling. They had the dollar. They had gold. They had silver. So you're going to have competing currencies. And when the dollar eventually loses that reserve status, I don't think, David, I don't think it's just going to be replaced by the yuan. I think there will be competing currencies. You know, the BRICS, the nations, especially, as I said, you know, using a basket of commodities to back it up.

But it's interesting, you know, if you have in my business, see, to me, you know, the old bankster J.P. Morgan, you know, he says that gold is money and everything else is credit. Well, in today's world, gold is money and everything else is debt. And, again, I see people kind of confusing this, like, well, is gold going to go up? I'm like, I don't know, but the dollar is going down. So, I mean, I don't really look at it like it's an investment. I look at it as money. To me, I'd rather have gold coins than I would have $100 bills any day of the week. I know how liquid that is.

And that's the thing about it, David, is we have a gold standard that's universal around the world. So whether you're in Boston or Bangladesh, that's the price of gold. That's spot. Around the globe, everybody knows spot price that's dealing in precious metals so we have that that's kind of a set thing markets have done that for hundreds of years and we have the ability to know universally what gold is so gold is money silver is money i mean i believe that bitcoin is a is a form of money in some ways, and especially because it's finite. I mean, it's not as reliable as gold or silver. It's not in your hand, but as far as transmitting value. So there's going to be competing currencies.

Really, the main thing is, is just education. If you know the ins and outs, if you're truly following currency markets and following how gold and silver are bought and sold, how to get in and out of cryptocurrency, these are things you need to learn. That's kind of what I do with my shows, my podcasts, and appearances. I just try to talk about what you can do to empower yourself in these times. Yeah, as we were talking about last week, I don't deal much with cryptocurrency. So I was like, you know, so what have you got to, you got to, you got your stuff in your wallet offline as you should keep it. You shouldn't keep it on any exchanges and everything, but you know, are you going to

be able to make exchanges with Bitcoin with somebody else? And as long as the internet is up, yes. So, but you need to know how to do that. What is the spot price of gold right now? Last time I checked, it was like $1,978. And I can check it for you right now. I'm just curious. I mean, it got up around $2,000.

It's kind of hovered around there. But as we're talking about this, and you talk about how, well, everybody wants to know what it is in terms of dollars, it goes up and down based on the dollar. The dollar is what is fluctuating. And it's going to fluctuate based on what people think the Federal Reserve is going to do to the economy in terms of easing money supply or changing interest rates or whatever. So they're going to look at that and say, well, that's going to be a good thing for the dollar.

People are going to want to invest in the dollar. So that changes the price of gold relative to the dollar. The way I think of it, Tony, is, you know, for the longest time we had, you know, in an engineer, we'd look at stuff, you know, going back and forth between metric and the English system. The U.S. is on the English system and pretty much everybody else was on a metric system. And it would get really complicated for people if they're trying to go back and forth between the systems but if you stay within the metric everything was very logical you know you didn't have you know 12 inches to a foot and three

feet to a yard and and you know 5200 and whatever it is you know feet to a mile you didn't have these different odd things everything was a multiple of 10 and if you knew what the prefixes were you knew whether it was 10 times whatever that unit was or one-tenth of that so within the metric system everything was very rational and and so it was the english system that messed it up and so that's what's really messing right the the the gold and silver is the u.s dollar is kind of like the english system that's throwing all these monkey wrenches into the units of measurement. And that's really the way people need to think about it. It's been pretty counterintuitive.

Yeah. It's been very consistent. The gold has been very consistent. As you pointed out many times, I've talked about it in terms of looking at a fixed goods, you know, from like a hundred years ago and you know, what is fine suit or pick some other commodity or something

like that. And you see that gold has kept its value, and it's about the same as it was 100 years ago. But the dollar has been all over the place because of political manipulations. Well, imagine if they actually taught that in schools. But that's not what they do. I mean, if you look at the 1970s, and by the way, gold is $1,979 as of right now. We'll talk about 1979. If you go from 1971, and that's the year I was born, if you go from 1971, gold was $35 an ounce. Nixon takes us off the gold standard.

By the day I was born, December 26, 1979, I believe it was around $750 a troy ounce for gold. That sounds about right. Right. So if you look at the 1970s, it seems like gold is the hottest, biggest investment. It's worth so much more. It really wasn't. It's the loss of the purchasing power of the dollar. And I think that has been

hidden. We don't truly know the true catastrophic loss of purchasing power yet. I think that's coming. I don't even know how to evaluate the price of gold. There's so much with the paper markets that is engineered to keep it artificially low. There's many people and researchers that have thought this for years about the paper markets and gold and bullion and the central banks. The dollar competes with gold. It's funny, David, I don't know if you saw this, but on Zero Hedge, there was a couple of Russian prankster comedians that got Jerome Powell to believe he was talking to Zelensky.

Did you see this? No, I didn't see that. I saw where they did it to Ursula von der Leyen of the European Central Bank. They got Jerome Powell, to believe he was talking to Zelensky. Did you see this? No, I didn't see that. I saw where they did it to Ursula von der Leyen of the European Central Bank. They got Jerome Powell as well? They got Jerome Powell, which is kind of funny. So, like, you got these two guys acting, playing Zelensky, who is himself an actor. And I'm thinking, is this some kind of paradox?

But they fooled Jerome Powell into thinking he was talking to Zelensky. And Powell had some interesting admissions about the economy and where it's headed and the chances of recession. And something I go back to Powell on, he said months ago, he said, we don't think that we'll have to, there will be a recession or we don't think we'll have to cause a recession for the inflation fight and i thought wow that's interesting that you know we just give this power this authority to the central bank i mean because it's you know i think it's the fifth plank of the communist manifesto that we have one yeah but we've got you know jerome powell uh wielding that power and i've thought

for a long time i don't think that they're they're long time, I don't think that they're going to step in to try to save the economy. I don't think their heart's in saving the U.S. economy as much as it is keeping a strong dollar and keeping the world's reserve currency. I think that's what they're striving to protect with these interest rate hikes. That's right. They don't want it to go into hyperinflation,

and they'll do whatever they have to to drive us into recession or depression to keep it from going into hyperinflation because their number one thing is the dollar. And yeah, we don't want to cause recession. You know, it's one of the things when I did that report on the 100th anniversary of the creation of the Federal reserve it's a wonderful lie and you know put in clips and stuff you know from uh it's a wonderful life and and i also had a lot of stuff in there about what people were saying about the federal reserve and what it would do when it was about to be created you know lindbergh's father and and other people were talking about that they said they're going to cause boom and bus cycles you know it was sold as doing just the opposite we're going to give financial stability of course j You know, it was sold as doing just the opposite. We're going to give financial stability. Of course, J.P. Morgan had been part of engineering a crash, just like Mr. Potter did, you know, in the movie. But they sold it as a thing of stability.

And yet, you know, the critics were saying, no, they're going to cause boom and bust and they're going to profit from the boom and bust. Ultimate insider trading, as we refer to it today. But that is exactly what they have done. You know, we were talking about the metric system. I think another way to look at the dollar versus gold is kind of a relativity thing. Imagine that you are on a train and then there's a gold train or you're on the dollar train. There's a gold train over there. And the dollar train is rapidly accelerating forward and backwards and forwards and backwards.

And the gold train is standing still. But when you're looking on this thing, if you don't feel the acceleration, you think the gold is going crazy. But the gold is right there. You're the one that's going really fast in one direction and real fast in the other direction. That's exactly right. I mean, we're going to keep whipsawing like this as the dollar goes through these last cycles as the world's reserve currency. And I don't know what happens after that.

I just know that right now, central banks are really what's moving the needle in gold. If you really drill down into the numbers, that's what you're seeing. These central banks are loading themselves up with the yellow metal. And that's because there's going to be a reset of value across the board globally, and they don't want to get caught flat-footed. And then that's what's driving the price. Normal people haven't yet. And again, this isn't a scare tactic. You know I don't, you know,

I don't do that. I just tell people it there. I'm looking at supply. It's one of the reasons I'm on the road right now. And I'm actually up in Illinois because I had to go pick up an order from a private dealer that I bought some, some supplies for Wolfpack for, because we're having a harder time getting on-time delivery in a timely manner for fractional gold. Because we've got the Wolfpack memberships, it caps out at a thousand. So if you're getting any gold, it's going to be fractionalized. So that's one of the things I'm doing right now and getting more supply. It is very short. And again, there's a lot of things I can get right now. I mean, there's certain

items, but when I started in this business, I think gold was $1,100 an ounce and something like that. And you see where it's gone since then. And silver, I mean, I used to be able to get silver Eagles for $16. I remember buying them and that was my cost. And now, you know, now, right now they're close to $40 a piece cost. And then, you know, we're retailing for 45, 46, 47. So there's so much premium in this stuff now too, David, that's another thing is that's a, people aren't even seeing that when I quote the spot price. Um, but the, the premium for the real world fee to get that in your hand. Um, so I, this is, you know, your audience, my audience, the premium for the real world fee to get that in your hand. Um, so I, this is, you know, your audience, my audience, uh, people that are paying attention, you're way ahead of the ball.

Um, because the mainstream media, when it's too late, they'll tell you it's time to get precious metals and there just won't be any. That's right. Yeah. Yeah. You're talking about that earlier, you know, 1979, 1980, that's about the time Karen and I got married. I remember, you know know gold is kicking around

800 an ounce and every and it was everybody said wow that's the investment of and of course you know relative to the dollar it was a great investment for people who got in there early the key thing is you know we're looking at this as a prepper thing we're looking at this as a long-term thing because we know long term what is going to happen to the reserve currency status, because it's been abused by the global police state. And so just like any other prep thing, you want to be able to do it little by little gradually get into it. And I think that's the real beauty of what you've got set up there with a Wolfpack.

That's a great program for people to be able to just do it on a regular basis and small amounts. But of course, you know, you're not limited to doing that either. Tony can cover any kind of things there. Of course, if we want to transfer your IRA into that, I've had some friends say, hey, I've got to get my IRA out of the stock market and stuff and get into gold. It's like, yeah, you absolutely do need to do that. And I try to get it into gold metal, not into gold mining stocks or in the ETFs and stuff. I mean, the gold mining side, I learned that lesson several decades ago,

gold mining stocks, because they're like these many stocks out of Canada. And you're talking about the penalty of trying to go in and out of that and changing currencies and all the rest of the stuff. Just even if you hit a home run, you ate up all your profits there because they're all done in percentages. So, you know, there's those types of profits there because they're all done in percentages. So there's those types of things. It's physical gold, physical silver.

And again, Tony at wisewolf.gold, great to deal with. I've known him for a very long time, and I really do appreciate what you set up there with davidknight.gold. For people who listen, let them know that you've come from here. Thank you so much for joining us today, Tony. Appreciate it. Thank you, David. It's an honor to sponsor this program. Thank you so much for joining us today, Tony. Appreciate it. Thank you, David. It's an honor to sponsor this program. Thank you so much. Thanks for going to Extra Trouble as busy as you are to come on the program and talk to us.

Have a good day. Thanks. You too, sir. Take care. All right. We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we're going to get our guest on. The book is Debunked, An Auditor Reviews the 2020 Election and the Lessons Learned. I want to talk about what it takes to have an honest election.

He is a CPA, MBA. He's got decades worth of experience. And so he's going to talk about some of the numbers and what we need to do in order to have an honest election in terms of the vote count. Of course, there's many other ways that they rigged the election in terms of not even having debates, but we'll be right back. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. The common man.

They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Welcome back, and our guest is Joseph Freed. He has an MBA from Case Western Reserve, as well as many years as an auditor for Ernst & Young. Then back in 1983, he formed his own firm.

He's had a 40-year career doing this. He's done a lot of audits as well as he is an AI CPA authorized peer reviewer for dozens of other audit firms. In 2003, he had a book. His first book was How Social Security Picks Your Pocket. We know that certainly is the case. 2008, after that financial crisis, he wrote a book called Who Really Drove the Economy Into the Ditch. But now he has a book that is about the election from an auditor's perspective. And so we want to talk about what went wrong, but we also want to talk about some solutions.

So joining us now is Joseph Fried. The book is Debunked, an Auditor Reviews a 2020 Election. You can find that on Amazon. And is there any other place that people can get that? Thank you for joining us, Joe. Is there any other place that people can get that book? Amazon or Barnes & Noble, either one. All right, good, good.

David, thank you very much for having me on. I sure appreciate it. Well, it's good to have you on. Before we get into everything, I mean, give us your take on what has happened with this dominion lawsuit and the firing of tucker i mean how do you see all of this stuff breaking well as you know i wrote an article recently and i think i wrote it maybe three or four days too soon because the first point i made i sort of gave a mild defense to fox i said that um unlike some other networks they had they allowed diversity because as you know tucker carlson was very much against the ukraine war yeah

hannity was very much for it and so forth uh so i was saying what's wrong with that and the same thing with the Dominion, that you had Maria Bartiromo and Justice, I mean, Judge Jeanine Pirro saying one thing. I don't think they were, by the way, really supporting this. I don't think they were telling the viewers, believe Sidney Powell, she's telling the truth, but they were giving her a platform. On the other hand, you had Tucker Carlson and others who were blasting her. I don't see anything wrong with that. And that was my point. But now it looks like I'm worried that Fox has gone

down the dark path of stifling dissent. Oh, yeah. Yeah, I think so. And I dropped my Fox completely yesterday. I won't even watch it anymore because that really, you know what really burned me up? What's that? It wasn't just that they came to a resolution without Tucker. It's the way they did it. I mean, the way they take a guy who's been there 14 years, their biggest earner, or at least the biggest, uh, I should maybe not the biggest earner, but certainly the biggest in terms of viewership.

Right. And they have some staffer just, uh, tell them don't come in on Monday. That's unbelievable. Well, you know, Megan Kelly was saying, um, and Tucker has said, maybe they're doing this because they want to sell the network. And Megan Kelly said, yeah, you know, there's a lot of advertisers who didn't like Tucker because he's controversial. So maybe they figured they can get anybody in there and they can sell more commercials,

but they're not looking at the bigger picture. You know, even if Tucker didn't turn in the ad revenue of some other programs, uh, his presence there was pulling in viewers and, and those, and that was driving people to these other programs where they were going to have advertisers. So that was a very narrow way to look at it, I think. But even if they wanted to have a conversation with him and say, Hey, you've got to go because we're losing money. You don't have to do it in such a horrible way that you're, you're basically trying to humiliate the man. So I just couldn't abide. Well, I've had similar experiences that where I used to work,

I was fired the same way for many had similar experiences that where I used to work. I was fired the same way for many of the same reasons where I was. There was also no concern in terms of you did not have an editorial staff that was telling us what we're going to cover and the angle that we're going to cover it from. You know, Megan Kelly came and she was doing interviews with us and, and, um, and she was with NBC at the time. And they were very stressed that the people that were with her were talking about. So, uh, tell us about your news meetings in the mornings. It's like, what? No, we don't do any of that. You know, same way it is for the opinion people at, at Fox news. And they couldn't believe it. You know, that was how, because typically they feed everything to these talking heads is the way they would do it at NBC and all the rest of them.

So you were able to come up with whatever you wanted to say, unless it offended the guy in charge. And if it offends the guy in charge, you get summarily dismissed without any notification whatsoever. In my case, it was a week before Christmas, and I didn't have tens of millions of dollars to fall back on like Tucker did. But I had an audience that supported me. So I really do appreciate the other people who kept this going but let's talk a little bit about the um the dominion issue i have focused uh way before this happened i was talking about smartmatic and dominion and ess and heart and all these other uh voting machine things. And I said, it gives us a unique kind of vulnerability that is even worse than if you've got the old classic voting machines that they would typically put in the trunk and drive around.

I said, they have all these different levels of vulnerability that you can see when the CIA gets hacked, when the Pentagon gets hacked. Don't tell me that these things are not going to get hacked. Don't tell me that they can't easily be manipulated from the inside. And if you do that, it is a lot of opportunity for corruption. And then, of course, where you come in, which is the auditing aspect of it. Talk a little bit about that and the difficulties that we have just from an auditing standpoint to know if an electronic voting machine has been hacked. Well, let me just preface it by saying when I heard Sidney Powell first talking, I said to myself, this lady might be 10 or 15 years behind the times because things have changed in the last

five or six years dramatically with the mail-out ballots, the mail-in ballots, and with not only a lack of ID, but the six swing states I looked at, for the most part, scrapped the signature testing. So my theory is, why would somebody bother with the cyber stuff in this era when, well, let me give an example. Nevada, three months before the election with Trump and Biden, they gutted their regulations. Harvesting has no limits in Nevada. It can be done anonymously. It can be done for money.

A guy theoretically could just walk in with 500 ballots and say, sign them all because they don't catch those signatures. And there's reasons for it. I articulate those in the book. Their method is ridiculous. And there was an informal test done, by the way. A very clever reporter for the Las Vegas Review-Journal conducted a test. And now it's just an informal test, but eight of nine bad

signatures went through. He had his friends write their own, to keep it legal, they signed the ballot envelopes, but they traced it in his style so that they knew it was not their normal writing they all went through anyway but there were actually reports and that's in my book there were there was a mail carrier who said i'm looking at thousands of these ballots sitting here what it's going to become of these they were finding them on floors they were finding them on mail uh areas of buildings so there was a yeah you mentioned when you say you said they had mail out uh ballot election and i've called it that i said this was a mail out election where they mailed out so many ballots that they had no control over where people were getting multiple ballots you might be somewhere that was close to two jurisdictions

get a ballot from both jurisdictions and that was close to two jurisdictions, get a ballot from both jurisdictions. And that was the thing that was completely out of control. And the electronic voting thing has been there for a while. Decades, we've talked about the vulnerability of that. And I had said in the 2016 election, I said, well, I think the next one's going to be a hacking fest. But it changed because of the lockdown.

And that was one of the things that I've been saying all along is that because they did the lockdown, because we had a lockdown election, because of Trump claiming it was a pandemic and we all had to lock down. That was the fundamental issue right there was doing this by mail. And, of course, that ties into the the ballot harvesting and things like that but but there's no way for people to be able to verify those things right well some of it though is so obviously uh phony uh like in michigan's a great example uh secretary of state jocelyn benson mailed out 7.7 million ballot applications that had never been done before in Michigan. There was no basis in the law to do it, but the courts backed her up. But the point I'm trying to lead to is, it's not like people to get a ballot would go up face to face and cough in somebody's face. This was all done remotely anyway.

It's not like, what was the reason for this? You either did it through the internet or you did it through an email or you did it through a text message. She had no basis to do that. Then you know what she did? She followed up immediately by declaring that all her staff were to presume signatures were valid. So that's telling the fraudster, oh, there's lots of ballots around here. By by the way less than half of them were actually used so there there was 3.4 million extra ballot applications floating out there and she's telling fraudsters by the way if you sign them we're going to presume that it's it's legitimate that's what that's totally unnecessary she used covet as an excuse but there was no basis, in fact, for that.

And they all do that. And I've been involved with third-party politics, and we have to get signatures to get on the ballot each time. They'd have some high threshold of ballot retention, so that if you had to get, say say maybe 10 percent of the vote for governor or for president to stay on the ballot very difficult for a new third party to do so every time that didn't happen you'd have to start all over again and do the signatures they go over them with a fine-tooth comb and of course we have seen this as well in terms of just like the recall election

of Gascon in LA they said you know they went over these signatures of the fine tooth comb and threw them out so here in this state they say we'll just assume all the signatures are valid and we won't even bother to look at all of them that's the kind of fraud that we're seeing but let me ask you this of course you know as you point out the ballots are controlled on a state by state basis right yeah and and so at the beginning of all this two days in there was this lie that was going around the you know from steve pachinik about how it was a sting and how there were blockchain watermark ballots that were out there and i said everything about this is wrong that the states are in control of the ballots there's not any ballots being shipped in from the federal

government there's not any technology to put blockchain watermarks on all these things either so all that was was incredibly uh off the mark wasn't it yeah i uh i think i know that i forget his name the guy you're referring to yeah well there were suspicious things, but not necessarily. Yeah, I know what you're saying. I know in Fulton County, they did have some whistleblowers who said, wait a minute. We saw a lot of ballots that looked strange, that they didn't look like they had ink, but they looked like they were printed with toner. But this was in a single county. It wasn't a national thing. That's right. And the ballots differ from state to state and the ballots are efficiently in charge on a state to state basis.

Yeah, I just wanted to clear that up. So let's talk about the ballot harvesting. We hear so much about ballot harvesting and we hear that Trump wants to do ballot harvesting now. And you got an op-ed piece you wrote. Should the gfp really do ballot harvesting so tell people what ballot harvesting is first all right well bail is harvesting the distinction between a good ground game which is perfectly fine and legal and has been done a long time and harvesting is you never with a good ground game you don't get your hands on somebody else's ballot. You keep your hands off of other people's ballots. They put it in the mailbox. They put it in the election center or they put it in the drop box.

There are, and by the way, even if you take the 10 closest states in the last election, in all cases except for one, harvesting is still illegal, which is a good sign in a way. Because when I say still, for the most part, what I mean is there are minor exceptions. Like in some states, you can harvest three ballots. In other states, you can harvest the ballots of family members. In other cases, you can do it for somebody disabled in your family, but they're minor exceptions. These are not like you take 500 ballots and you stuff them in a box. Right. And let me just insert here and say, when I talk about, you know, the vote by mail election,

how that turned everything upside down, I had somebody contact me and say, look, I'm disabled. I always do this. We're not talking about that, you know, kind of absentee ballot that is driven by process where you request it and they send it to you and there's some handshaking and stuff like that happening. And it is a small number anyway. That's not the issue. The issue was this lockdown election and how this became essentially, you know, the major way that everybody voted. Right. Well, here's the problem for Republicans.

This is why I strongly advise them against it. I'll start with the last one first, because that's the problem for republicans this is why i strongly advise them against it i'll start with the last one first because that's the big one they'll be prosecuted republicans forgot what what's happening right now in manhattan where we have a prosecutor who is elevating a bookkeeping mistake because you know whether you call a nondisclosure agreement nondisclosure expense or legal expense, in this particular case, there was no tax implication. This was not anything more than a ministerial clerical error or maybe deliberately to conceal something embarrassing,

but it wasn't malevolent. And he's trying to elevate that and tie it into a federal crime that he doesn't have jurisdiction over to get a Republican. At the same time, he's taking serious crimes and de-escalating them or diminishing them. That's right. Yeah, we don't have a Justice Department that's fair anymore. They're going to escalate it because of political connections. They're going to escalate the minor situations into major felonies and vice versa, right?

Oh, can you imagine how the media would have fun catching a Republican harvesting ballots? If he did two ballots, they would make it the biggest story of the week yeah and they and republicans seem to think you know this is what happened by the way with january 6 to a large extent people don't talk about this but a lot of republicans saw that summer of love that had just taken place seven months earlier there was uh horrible if you want to call it an insurrection at the white House instead of the Capitol.

And I wasn't there, but I suspect that a lot of Republicans were saying to themselves, we're going to show those Democrats they think they can go rioting. We can be tough, too. They didn't understand the double standard that was going to come down on them. Well, I'm here in Tennessee, and so we just had this situation where we had some legislators lead a mob. They were pushing and shoving other legislators trying to keep them from getting into the chamber. Then when they got into the chamber, these Tennessee three got up there and took over the whole democratic process.

And then look at the way this has been portrayed. You know, this is some kind of anti-democratic thing. And these the Tennessee three have been brought into Biden's White House and celebrated. They're not being put in a jail and tortured, you know, like the January 6th people. They have had similar things happen as well in Kentucky. You know, you had the trans activists took over their legislature the same week. So, yeah, there is a a tremendous double standard and you're right if the republicans want to go in and do some of these things that are really questionable

and i think that they're corrupt i think you probably agree that as well uh they'll look the other way when this type of corruption is being done by them but they're not going to look the other way when it's done by republicans they're going to make it look like criminal activity and it's not that hard to make it look like criminal activity, because I think basically ballot harvesting is designed to be criminal. You see, that's the thing. There's no incentive to do harvesting unless you do it on a big scale. But let me tell you the other.

All right. So I started with that one, which Republicans better remember that they'll be prosecuted. But here's some other reasons. They're not going to be good at it. Because if you really look at where the harvesting takes place, it's among the homeless. I mean, homeless can vote 20 times because they're in one parking lot. And there are cases where there are 1,000 or 2,000 people with the same address. And the Democrats always say well yeah

but those are homeless people they have a right to vote too you know yeah right but the trouble is a month later they're all in a different parking lot and somebody's going around registering them again so but who owns the homeless they're all in the democratic strongholds those homeless they're not in the republican areas the republicans aren't going to recruit those people. And there's other factors. A big element, I don't want to get my mailman mad at me, but mailmen are implicated in harvesting. And there's been, I think in that article, I may have cited John Levine, I think it was, of New York Post. He got a great story. He found an anonymous harvester, big-time harvester, working for the Democrats for 20 years.

And he talked about how he had mail carriers, plural, in his work crews. And if you think about it, why not? Who can do it better? Here's a mailman he's going on his route and he says oh i've got this apartment here and there's five bills going to the same place and i know that oh there's only one that's valid i'll take the other and i'll make ten dollars on each one i got forty dollars just on that one newman? Seinfeld, right? Newman, the mailman. He's not going to determine who's going to be president. Another area are the nursing homes

because the disabled, demented patients are taken advantage of sometimes. And nurses tend to lean. They're not super liberal, but if you look at the voting records, they do lean to the left. So I'm just saying it's not even going to work well. Forget it. Instead, try to expose, and you can expose the Democrats.

You know how you do it? Offer rewards, big money cash rewards. I know some people will fight it, and they'll say it's intimidation. But first of all, I start with a public announcement. You can do this six months in advance of the election. You put out public announcements saying, don't hand your ballot to anybody. In our state, that's against the law and you don't want to be participating in it and your vote may be altered then you also back it up with cash rewards if you hear of this there's a ten thousand dollar reward for the conviction of somebody who

is harvesting ballots illegally and it's almost always illegal like i said except for minor exceptions so that is the way i think to go to expose now i'm then you have the problem well who's going to prosecute it because the democrats don't prosecute their cases one of the things i put you know there was a great um the public uh information legal i forget it's pilf it's p-i-l-f is the acronym as in pilfer it sounds like filth but it's filth and they they did a great study in florida a few years a couple years ago where they found that there were 156 referrals made for election fraud and david do you know how many of those were followed up on and prosecuted in any way let me guess zero probably right zero yeah no investigations they ignored it now now thank god that we have a florida governor now who has formed an election force that's great and they are and

they're doing magnificent work by the way don't believe those left-wing summaries. Go to their report in January of this year, of 23. put out a report and I'll tell you something they've done magnificent work and they got a big blockbuster I think coming up there's in Orange County which is Orlando there is a black Democrat former candidate who is blowing the whistle she says I'm for multiple years I think decades even, there's been a scheme going around where people have been hitting black residents and buying their ballots. And they're working on that case. So there's some big potential cases. But in most parts of the country, those cases are totally ignored do you think that uh in detroit in uh fulton county in manhand they care about those they'll ignore those cases but you need so i guess i was leading up to that that

you you need uh i was saying expose the harvesting and then you got to find a prosecutor who will take it seriously if you can't find a prosecutor one thing i've just started to get on to is the power of the sheriff the county sheriff has tremendous power yes and they did the sheriff in racine uh wisconsin is the one that blew the whistle on the nursing fraud it's major nursing fraud there in the 2020 election but the uh And I didn't know this. I'm just telling you what I've learned fairly recently, that a sheriff is, first of all, he's an elected officer. He's answerable to nobody except the people of his district. That's right.

And he's usually established his position in the Constitution of the state. So he's got a tremendous amount of power and so people and already democrats are trying to mobilize a counter offense here saying uh governor so and so you need to uh rein in this uh rogue sheriff here or something but i i don't think they're going to find it easy because like you say, they're set in the constitution with certain privileges. So it's a very powerful position. And I've been saying, because I'm fed up with all of the establishment politics,

I've been telling everybody pay attention to who your sheriff is. And we saw this, I've been saying that for years, we saw this very clearly during the lockdowns of the pandemic and everything. They could make it a lot worse or they could nullify even these rules that were coming from the state governor. Uh, and it's the sheriffs, uh, that they can do that. No, we're not going to enforce that. We're actually going to protect people. I talked just earlier in this show about a church in Illinois where Pritzker

was horrible about the lockdowns and, but the local sheriff, sheriff uh was protecting the church to uh allow them to meet and they put their deputies there on sundays to keep the state police from bothering anybody you know so you can do things like that it's a lot of power at the sheriff they can investigate and they have um you know the ability to uh to have those police actions you know the other part of this that we look at and it's been there for a long time, and I just, you know, when I looked at all these different aspects of fraud, and of course, North Carolina, where I used to live, they had, still do, I think, the longest voting period of anybody.

They had no IDs. And I've told the story many times about a friend of my brother-in-law's who went to vote on election day. And all you have to do is give them a name and an address. And they look it up and say, you've already voted. And so does this other person at your address. And he goes, wait a minute, that's my mom. She's been dead for years.

And so that's the kind of fraud that happens. You need to be able to vote early and vote often with these people. So there's a lot of things that have been there for a long time that are very simple. And they don't want to fix them. At the time, we republicans in charge these are rules that were put in by the democrats long voting periods and no id and stuff like that but we had a completely republican legislature republican governor they didn't want to change any of that stuff yeah the republicans were really slow to the dance here and uh one of the biggest, you know, in retrospect,

someday I think people will look back and say Trump's biggest accomplishment might be that he's fighting the election. I know there's mixed opinions on this, but somebody had to sort of wake the Republicans up to the fact that, to shake things up, that you have to start paying attention to these processes because we were like frogs in a warm pot of water that was getting hotter and hotter and we were falling asleep yeah i mean you got to wake up yeah yeah everybody goes to sleep when there's a

republican in charge or they think they're in charge uh who was actually in charge you don't see but when they think that the republicans are in charge they go to sleep talk about um why there weren't any uh convictions in your opinion for the election fraud you know they didn't do too well in courts we had the courts throwing it out saying uh as a candidate you don't have standing to look at all this stuff i've looked at this for the longest time and and you know i was saying when this was all happening why do they keep going to the courts i and and you know i was saying when this was all happening why do they keep going to the courts i mean certainly you would expect the courts would give them a hearing they did over the uh the 2000 election we had the hanging chads and all the other kind

of stuff that went all the way to the supreme court and did it pretty quickly but this was distributed over several different states so it was different in that regard but they just got shut down everywhere and so i looked at four states, and they had razor-thin margins. And I said, so why don't they take their case, if they've got a case that they can prove fraud, why don't they take it to the state legislatures that are Republican in those four states? They had Republican legislatures, razor-thin margin that went to Biden. And in two of the four states, they even had Republican governors. And I thought, why don't they take it there?

Because the state legislature can send a different slate of electors. And if they had done that, then, you know, as Thomas Massey said, if they'd sent two different slate of electors, if one of them had come from the state board of elections and the governor and another one had come from the state legislature, we could have a discussion as to which one of those groups we want to recognize. But it had to be sent officially and nobody sent, pretended to send another slate of electors. I think you're alluding to the independent state legislature theory.

And, but do you say, don't you think, and I know you're an attorney, so I defer to you. No, I'm not an attorney. Oh,

you're not? No, no. Oh, I thought you were. No, I'm an engineer, but.

Oh, okay. Well, that's better. I'm glad to hear it, Dave. not an attorney. Oh, you're not? No, no. Oh, I thought you were. No, I'm an engineer. Oh, okay. Well, that's better. I'm glad to hear it, Dave. I feel better. But, you know, I think that that theory has not been tested at the Supreme Court level, but it may be soon. As you probably know, the Supreme Court is considering a case. I think it had to do more with redistricting, but it may have implications for the election of whether a state, the legislature, could take control. I don't think in the aftermath of 2020, I mean, I think there would have been pushback so fast. Oh, yeah.

It would have gone. I'm just saying that that might have been one way they could get it to the supreme court right if you could convince the state legislature look you know here's our proof we got some fraud here they say all right we're going to send a republican slate instead of a democrat slate and then you know if uh you know thomas massey pence and other people look at it and say well this is one we're going to recognize and the constitution says that the state legislature will set up the terms for the, uh, for the electors or whatever, then the court would have had to have heard that and would have had to weigh in on that.

I think, and, and look at that. They may not have looked at the evidence. They may just have looked at the point of law and said, well, you know, which,

you know, are we going to recognize the state board of elections? Are we going to recognize the legislature? But I thought that they had a, a case there, but why do you think that they didn't, you know, well,

you know, when I first, when had a case there, but why do you think that they didn't, you know, Well, you know, when I first heard the independent state legislature theory, I thought it was kind of extreme and wacko. And I've come to believe more and more in it. And I actually think it's a very, it could be a very positive thing. And here's what I mean. What turned me around was seeing the Pennsylvania and the Wisconsin Supreme Courts. They made decisions so unbelievably abominable that I'm thinking,

they basically threw their states to Biden. And I'm thinking, and I'll back that up real quickly. Pennsylvania. Trump finally won the right to have observers after going to the court a couple times at the lower level. He won the right to have observers within six feet of a table processing ballots. And the Supreme Court said, no, no, no no you have to stay back 15 to 18 feet in philadelphia the rest of the the red part of the state you can have close observation but you

can't have close observation in philadelphia now what kind of supreme court does that and then they i think we said already the um when the signatures uh when when the uh book bar the secretary of state wanted the signatures to not necessarily be used the supreme court takes it a step further and says oh no you can't use those signatures to match anything so pennsylvania's got no standards at all they gutted their election and in my opinion by doing, they made it an invalid certification. So when I see these Supreme Courts like that, and the one in Wisconsin, I won't digress to talk about that, but that was just as bad. I'm thinking, well, why should seven people on a state Supreme Court be able to throw an election like that? Why not have it so that you have the legislature step forward

and say we voted the majority of our legislature says that's you're not following election law the supreme court of wisconsin or pennsylvania says yes that is our election law you take it then up the road up the federal court system so you I don't know, I'm not a attorney, but you would start at the lower levels and work all the way to the federal, because that's basically what happened with Gore v. Bush, right? Well, you know, you have a divided government, you have a separation of powers, and that's true at the state level. And so you have the governor, you have the courts, you have the legislature, and then

you've got the constitution says the legislature shall make the rules. That's the only guidance that we've got about that. But if you had a disagreement between, uh, the, um, you know, the state board of elections, which is, you know, they're on the governor's, uh, side, and you've got a disagreement with the legislature, uh, that sets up an interesting, uh, checkpoint of, um, of checkpoint of um of powers that that might get you into a deeper discussion of what is there but let's talk a little bit about since your book is about uh auditing and you're an auditor you know debunked and auditor reviews the 2020 election

let's talk a little bit about uh the the impossibility of auditing and the things that have been done to keep you from being able to do a real audit. Well, election people don't even know what an audit is. They think it's counting. Counting is the end product. Well, we start with a risk assessment. We look at the external threats. In the case of the election, there were a lot of those. There were all those 19 bellwether counties that didn't go the right direction.

There was all these signs, and everybody's heard those. Trump got so many extra votes over the previous election. That normally means he wins. Those are external threats. It's valid to consider them. They're certainly not proof or even evidence of fraud. That's for sure. Right. But those are are external threats. It's valid to consider them. They're certainly not proof or even evidence of fraud, that's for sure. But those are the external threats. There's internal threats we look at too, which might be like a complicated Dominion machine that nobody has a

right to look at because of proprietary restrictions. That would be called an internal threat. And we look at those threats and we say how significant they are. And then we say, well, what kind of internal control system does the election center have to fight those? Like, do they, for example, rigorously, well, first of all, do they have ID? No, they don't have ID. Do they check signatures? No. For the most part, the six weeks, they did not check signatures. And I could go down the list. I won't waste your time on it. But so their systems were terrible. I mean, just terrible systems. You know, it really riles me. I'm sure you know John R. Lott, Jr., the Ph., the PhD who works on election issues. And he put out a great study a couple of years ago comparing, well, basically what the 47 countries of Europe do. And every

single one. Last year, it was all but one. Part of Britain did not have ID required, but now they even moved to it starting January 1st of this year. Every single one of the 47 have ID, and I believe it's all but one is photo ID. And it's really crazy because they're so focused now to an extreme of having biometric identification. They want a global digital ID. They wanted vaccine ID and passports and all the rest of the stuff, but not for voting. That's not suspicious at all. Is it when you got to do it to cash a check or whatever?

I mean, but they don't everything except for voting. You want to fly on a plane. You got to show me your ID. You know, well, you, you want to hear a real hoot.

The Democrats always act like they're people. Voters can't figure out how to get ID. It's going to be too confusing for them. That's right, yeah. In Georgia, Georgia from 2016 to 2020, their rejection rate for bad ballots dropped to one eighteenth so if if this is if this is it in 2016 it's one eighteenth as much in 2020 yeah but here's what's really significant that's the statewide fulton county the the stronghold for democrats that That's in Atlanta, right? It's near Atlanta, right.

It dropped to just 14% of the state rate. So those marginalized citizens who don't know how to do anything, they were seven times smarter when it came to filling out their ballots, apparently. Seven times smarter than the rest of the state. It's so obvious what happened there. They were just letting all the ballots slip through no matter what. Signed, unsigned, any defect, it didn't matter. No address, didn't matter. You know, when I was in Texas, I did a report there about the State Board of Elections and the guy that was running it had worked at the rose law

firm you know where hillary clinton was and they brought him back and he was brought back by a republican i think it was rick perry who brought him back because they had a long list of republican governors but he he came back under rick perry and every election uh he would tell every one of the counties uh don't keep a an image a facsimile image of the ballots. Just get rid of all those things. And in the Constitution, it said that they had to keep them, but he would send it out every election and say, don't retain those things. So we don't even have anything to look at, let alone, you know, and that's what is happening

in most cases, right? There's not anything that you could go back and even take a look at. As you're pointing out, you've got different risk assessments, internal and external, and you would audit things like that. But, I mean, even if you wanted to go back and do a recount, they don't have the stuff where you can get an honest recount. Well, you know, I digress a bit. The next step after you do all that analysis is that then you'd plan some tests.

You'd say, well, this but but i want to say something in some cases you stop right there and you never go a step further in other words when you hit i give this analogy sometimes imagine you have a pizza shop where they have no record system but they have a big cardboard box in the middle of the room and we sell some pizza they throw 20 in the box they need some sauce they take some money out and buy some sauce and all year long that's going on and at the end of the year they say hey joe we need our financial statements audited no it's not auditable i don't care what you do we don't count anything i don't care how much money is in that box because it doesn't mean anything that's really what you had with these sick these six swing states that i looked at and it's meaningless when you have unsigned when you have no id and you have no real signature

standards and let me say one more thing about it on my mind about signatures. Even under the best of circumstances, signatures mean nothing. There's a test I cite in another article. It's something else I'm about to write, where they compared how well professional signature examiners do to non-professionals. And non-professionals are what we have in our election centers. The non-professionals had a failure rate of 38%. And you know how they fail? They tend to, they said the professionals tend to focus on the differences between two sets of signatures. The non-professionals tend to focus on the similarities, so they tend to have these level one mistakes where they overmatch.

They think that everything's matching when it's not matching. So signatures mean nothing. Get that out of there. Yeah, so when you look at this thing and the record system is so messed up, you would, as an auditor, you would just say, well, that's it. There's nothing that can be done. Yeah, that's right. But if you did say, well, all right, I can work with this, then you'd beat the heck out of those transactions. You'd be getting a thousand of this type of ballots. You'd be retesting signatures. You'd be actually—and by the way, the very best

test, the test that I recommend for Republicans to use, use canvassing of residences, not of people necessarily, but of residences. So in other words, you select like 800 houses. This will ferret out the harvesting. You select 800 houses in in a systematic way. So it's representative of the whole county. And you knock on doors and you say, and you have a list of all the people who supposedly voted by mail, according to the county, because you can get that list. So you say, well, according to the records you voted by mail in the last election, is

that true? And you're going to get a certain i guarantee you a certain percentage will say no and but it's very important to do it right away before memories fade you want it accurate if you wait six months people will legitimately forget what the heck they did so you got to do this like in the days following election but that's what the cyber ninjas wanted to do in maricopa county by the way remember that audit but they were blocked big time uh carolyn maloney jamie raskin merrick garland all came down on them with both feet and uh said no you will not it's intimidating

even though this is months after the election, it's intimidating to voters. But that's the way. To be fair, if you want to get it representative, you're going to have to go to the graveyards as well, right? Absolutely. You're going to have to poll them as well. Let's talk, though, about what we've talked about what's wrong. Let's talk about what needs to be done and the theory that the republicans will be interested in doing it okay um well i gotta ask a question are we talking about republicans are in control or the democrats are in control of the state well let's say the

republicans are in control of the state what needs to be done okay then we can talk about both of them but let's start with the republicans because okay yeah uh obviously you want to get the id in there uh you want to ban harvesting completely uh mail-in ballots okay but you got to have a reason like you're disabled or you're traveling so these are just reasonable things um uh you can still keep signature standards as an addition to the id requirement but that's all you know just as an addition let's see i would have a uniform shorter voting period would you put that in there yeah i was gonna i'm just about to get to that i was going to say a uniform period for voting uh with a uniform cutoff as well as a as a start too and as for the machines i i would never allow a vendor to say, you can't look at our machine.

It's proprietary secrets. You know, I would make that when you bid out those, if you're going to use the machines. Frankly, I don't even think some of these counties need to have machines at all because, know accounting isn't such a big hard process right so all these are big adding machines they're very expensive and complicated yeah when you look at the thing we look at the uh they have people who go around and look at the um uh slot machines and the casinos and uh i don't know how far they're able to get in there but i imagine it's probably not nearly as uh uh sealed off a black box as it is for the voting machines yeah they compare with these these things but yeah i i would look at it i mean my ideal solution would be just hand ballots everybody votes on one maybe two days and you got a holiday you know so

that you got because i understand that some people if you make it on a one particular day, some people can't get off of work. So you make it two days, you make it a weekend or whatever, you give people a holiday and everybody votes at the same time. I always talk, Joe, about the situation when the American government ran an election in Iraq. They had it on the same day. They didn't have a good way to id people so when you vote you get your thumb painted purple and you couldn't wash it off right and that's how they kept people from voting uh uh in multiple times in different places you could do some so they know what it takes to to have an honest election and the state department will typically look, this is another thing.

I don't know what, in terms of, um, in terms of the exit polls, the state department will look at the exit polls and, uh, and a country's elections and what was officially reported. And if they see more than a 5% difference there,

they'll say there was fraud, but you never see, you know, we have one agency that does all of the exit polls and it's pooled for all the media and they'll give them demographic cross tabs and they'll say well you know this many people who are white or this many people are black or male and female or you know the the one-armed people they they voted for this candidate that can't but they'll never give you the total because they don't want you to compare the total to what was actually reported the exit poll total versus the official

well you were saying if there's a discrepancy of so much in the exit poll you know that reminds me of something too remember i was talking about georgia and how they dropped from what from the 118th of of the rejection rate of of 2016. any i you were saying what would you do to make better controls i was i put a provision in any change in rejection that goes that big triggers an automatic audit yeah you that was 78 000 votes in georgia that election was only 11,800, the margin, and you've got 78,000 changed just by rejection rates, by, in other words, the discretion of the people counting the ballots. That's not an election. That's just baloney. I mean, and then in Fulton County, it was even more, you know what it dropped to? If you compare the state 2016 rate to the fulton county one one hundredth and

twenty-eighth it's hard to even say but imagine more than 128 parts it dropped to one of them that's so obviously fraudulent yeah that you know people don't want to hear that word they say that's not proof you know no court's going to say that it's proof to an auditor of something seriously wrong that's right seriously but no do you want me to get into what to do with the democrats yeah let's keep going with that yeah so we got that for the for the republicans and i would you know my preference would be to see hand counted uh hand ballots and have as you pointed out a close observation where people are watching it that's the way they do it in Europe as well. I remember when they had Brexit and they were counting ballots

and you had people who were, you know, standing over them, watching this stuff, not standing over them, but, you know, close enough, five or six feet away from the table, that they're not going to interfere with them, but they can see everything that's going on clearly. You know, that reminds me of something, too. That's another change I would make is have a bigger period between the election and the certification.

Because the standards we have worked when people walked in, 90% would walk in, they signed their name in front of somebody. And it was pretty quick. It really was mostly just counting. Now it's more than counting because you've got all these baloney ballots coming in unsigned no id you've got to examine them i mean frankly the whole system's atrocious but it takes time how is anybody going to launch a lawsuit or an investigation in two weeks or something some of the states have incredibly short periods it's very it varies a lot with the states yes but anyway all right uh the democrats are in control this is tough now and there's no easy solution but first of all

you got the fox guarding the chicken house okay solution you have to have some very tough skinned observers uh including a lot of lawyers going to these districts because it was sad. I felt bad for the people. I mean, in Detroit, in some of those, there were several areas. Fulton County was one. Detroit was another.

There was about four or five cities where those people needed helmets. They were being abused terribly. You should see the hundreds. One of the things Cindyindy powell did right she did a lot of things wrong but she had like a hundred affidavits and unfortunately all her crazy talk about certain things distracted from it but she had a lot of testimony under oath from people or affidavits i should say under oath from people uh affidavits, I should say, under oath from people

citing the same thing that they throw out a Republican observer and the whole room would cheer, including the paid workers. And there were racist comments made about them. And they were really intimidated. And that's got to stop. But anyway, that's the first thing is tough thick-skinned observers next thing is documents start requesting the vital documents with your right to know your freedom of information whatever the terminology uh right away before the election's even over like put in your request we want the chain of custody documents you know in arizona 740 000 ballots were not covered with any chain of custody document i mean you're taking it on faith wow 740 000 and that's a verifiable fact thanks to verity vote in in Pennsylvania, they did a great job on that. So that would be the second thing is to documents, to get those important documents.

Then the third thing, which should start right away, is the canvassing. If you can find a tough auditing firm, and I have to admit, auditors tend to be little worms. As the image says, I don't think they're right. You know, if I weren't retired, I'd have a hard time writing this book because my clients would be attacked. They would be told, hey, why you have this horrible election denier doing your books for you? Why are you doing that? He shouldn't do your audit. He's a monster. So they don't want to get involved, even the big firms. They just don't want to get involved. But

if you can, if you can't get them, get some very credible retired people with great images and integrity, because they will be attacked. But they've got to knock on those doors and ask people about that voting. that's the only way to attack the harvesting and the phony ballot through the mail votes well that's the same kind of thing we saw throughout this this pandemic you know if you got a doctor who's got a different opinion from the the official narrative or whatever they're get they get attacked they lose their job they lose their career they lose access. And this is one of the really, I think, frightening things that's happened to our society. It really is a totalitarian approach.

You know, people understood that you, in the days of Solzhenitsyn, you know, if you criticize the government, you're going to lose your home, you're going to lose your job, you're going to lose everything. That's what they're doing to people. And if we, each of us stand uh down because of those threats against us that's when we lose we only can can get through this if we stand up one by one and i know a lot of courageous people have done that in different places but that's not what most people do they will succumb to that kind of pressure just mandates and everything yeah well writing this book i mean my first the first two months i just tried to grab all the information i could because i saw it disappearing i mean because you know youtube started striking everything off yeah and it's terrible i mean a lot of i imagine there's

a lot of people who don't realize what's going on because they're not trying to get that i mean if you want you know it's like what were they saying on twitter that after elon got it he he discovered there was all this child porn going on and stuff that that was okay but on the other hand talk about vaccines or talk about elections was was banned from twitter i mean it's a crazy world. That's right. Oh, yeah. And it's still that way. Let me finish. Okay. So what else to do? If you can, do an audit.

Now, nobody's going to let you do an audit, but unless, and skip back to your comment about the legislature, they might have the authority, and they did, for example, in Arizona, have the authority to have Dr. Shiva Ayyaduri, I don't know if that's a name you've heard. Yeah, I've interviewed him. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. He's a brilliant man. I mean, he just proved that the Arizona audit was a fraud. I mean, he proved it because he assembled a panel of six people, three professionals, three non-professionals to examine 499 sample signatures, compare them to the registration, and they found 12% didn't match. 12%. That is extending it out to the Maryland population of Maricopa County. That's 204,000 votes in the election decided by 1 20th as much, 10,000. Wow. So 20 times more. And you know what?

I could almost hear it in my head what the Democrats would say. They said, yeah, but Joe, those would be cured. That's their word du jour now is curing ballots, which is the phoniest thing. They think that you could, well, let's say you cure 90% of them. You still have 20,000 phony ballots in an election decided by 10,400. I mean, there's no way that was a solid, that should have been certified. And I never will go to the point of saying Trump won because as I said before, to an auditor, if something isn't certifiable you stop there you don't say but i

think maybe it was this or maybe you know i can't really certify this but i think they made a billion dollars you don't do that you just stop and so i'm not going to say who won that election let people can make up their mind who is the who are the ones cheating but um but i'm going to say that okay what else can you do? The audit, if you can. And the last thing I think I'd recommend is that reward strategy again. We're not using rewards. Some of this corruption can be ferreted out because you know something,

harvesting usually is a multi-person operation. And those people will rat. I mean, you're going around. A lot of people know what's going on the reason i remember i said i told you about orange county orlando that black democrat woman and i say a race only because this was all done within the black community and she was pointing that out she said this was a black thing that they were targeting black voters. And that's why she couldn't didn't feel she could win in an election there. This this has to be stopped. But there was a lot of people who knew about that.

A lot of people. And believe me, if you dangle a ten thousand dollar reward, some of those people would have stepped forward years ago and blown the whistle on it. Oh, yeah, I agree. Yeah. The thing is, though, that reward is going to have to come from the legislature and even then they're going to get uh they're going to get sued by the justice department or something like that because if you go back and you look at what would the the amazing case of this guy who was convicted of you know trying to manipulate the election because he put a joke meme up there you know oh by the way don't forget to vote on wednesday type of thing right

and the other side again as you're talking about, don't try what the Democrats do because you had Democrats who were doing the same thing. Nobody even said anything about it. This guy puts it up and they call it election interference and convict him on that. So if you put up something there and say we're going to run a reward, that better come through the legislature

or they're going to come after any individuals with that. It truly is. We're in the final stages of an unbelievably corrupt and totalitarian government. That's the real takeaway from all this stuff. I mean, we've had so many, you know,

we've had so many problems with elections for such a long time. And as I've told people, you know, the corruption and elections begins with a two-party system that determines who even gets on the ballot and who gets to have a debate and now we've just had both trump and biden say no we're not going to have any debates this time so it's amazing before we lose time here again the book is debunked and auditor reviews the 2020 election and people can find your articles at Western journal. Is that correct? They're Western journal.

They're at American thinker. I have at least as many there. And I have a sub stack account is Joe free. Dot CPA at sub stack or something like that. Okay. John sub stack as well. Great talking to you. Thank you so much. Appreciate it.

Thank you, Dave. you so much Joe appreciate it thank you Dave the David Knight show is a critical thinking super spreader if you've been exposed to logic by listening to the David Knight Show. Please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to father. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds.

It's the David Night Show.