The David Knight Show - 27Dec22 Nanobots to Kill Cancer and mRNA for EVERY Disease
Episode Date: December 27, 2022OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Conservatives in Western Canada pass a law rejecting federal sovereignty. Will it be secession? Nullification?3:04 Rand Paul’s annual Festivus report. Governme...nt would be funny if it weren't so corrupt, but it's funny anyway.24:22 TSA finds parts of a gun inside jars of peanut butter - better Skippy the flight35:27 "Soviet" Moscow, Idaho's petty, vindictive and self-incriminating war with Christians is heading to court39:50 The Air Force Academy, like West Point, has been taken over by Marxist and racist ideology. How and why our institutions were taken over a long time ago by Marxists46:14 Why do we love and celebrate Christmas more than other holidays? Is it because it's the only holiday that is really rooted in traditions in a society with few remaining roots?50:22 A new song for the David Knight Show Christmas album — something I've played for 51 years 54:08Writer at reason.com looks at Christian Nationalism, conservatives, libertarians — will they become the monster they fight? Can Christian morality be forced? How do we affect change?1:03:16 Many people have asked us about our dog Scout. He's having a big time chasing his own breath — here's a video clip1:11:45 Who's attacking power stations again in Washington state? When it happened in NC, leftist conspiracy theorists said it was conservatives trying to stop a Drag Queen show. I have my own theory… 1:14:31Troubling data for UK medical dictators who tell you to ignore their data and their models1:30:18 Ben Shapiro’s confession about TrumpShots. Says people should pay for misleading — but not him?1:39:09 Catherine Austin Fitts takes on interviewer over the MAGA mindset that Trump didn't know and wouldn't willing participate with the depopulation shots1:44:41 Moderna sues Pfizer over patents — grab some popcorn2:00:52Nasal vaccines are here now. Remember Operation Sea Spray?2:13:20China’s abrupt turn — don't fall for the same trap mainstream media is laying for us again with body bags, crematoriums and tales of mass casualties. Is there a NEW wrinkle to the lies?2:19:55How many people die a day in China from the virus?2:26:49The DEPUTIZED STATE —FBI hid CIA involvement. Twitter hid FBI involvement. Both Trump and Biden administration involved2:44:21 The CIA is referred to in Twitter communications as the “OGA”, which stands for “other government agency”, but same old tricks2:50:13Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie Take your business international.
Enterprise Europe Network is the world's largest network
providing free support and advice to SMEs with global ambitions.
With over 450 partner organisations worldwide,
we bring together unparalleled expertise to serve businesses like
yours. We can help you discover partners in new markets, advance your digitisation and gain
valuable insights into EU funding opportunities. Take advantage of free expert advice and innovation
resources. Visit een-ireland.com and take your business global today. Using free speech to free minds.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 27th of December,
year of our Lord, 2022, day 1020 of the emergency.
And today we find very interesting information.
I think it's the most interesting information that's been produced
in the documents about the Twitter files. And that is that Joe Biden was personally responsible for getting Alex Berenson banned
on Twitter. All these people who said, well, it's just a private company. And we heard this
from conservatives. We heard it from conservative think tanks and libertarian think tanks.
It's just private business. Well, it's not.
It was always the deep state allied with the deputized state.
We're going to talk about that,
but we also have some alarming health information.
China is back with a pandemic part due, and we also have pharmaceutical companies
working on many more mRNA vaccines
and even nanobots to inject into your body
to kill the disease, of course. We'll be right back.
Before we get into that news, let's just talk about some general news here,
because there's an interesting thing happening in Canada. We've had Jason Kenney, the fraud conservative there who was arresting pastors in Alberta.
These are pastors who had been meeting with their churches for many, many months.
It was simply about saving face, saving the pandemic lives.
If you got people meeting and singing, remember, going to church was the most dangerous activity you could be involved in because people are singing.
You're blowing stuff out, right, everywhere.
Oh, it's going to be a disease factory. only that most of these people are old and yet they weren't dropping like flies
nothing was happening to them it was the exposure of the lie and it could not be tolerated so the
conservative prime minister jason kenney locked up. And so now they've got a good conservative there.
Apparently she said a lot of things.
She talked about the world economic forum and how they were running this thing.
I was like, well, that's encouraging.
Let's see what she does.
Now she is, um, and other people in Alberta are talking about having, rejecting federal
sovereignty in a lot of different areas.
And so there is talk of secession.
I don't know if they're talking about secession or about nullification.
Nullification would be the wise course to take.
It may eventually result in secession,
but you need to establish what your government is going to do to build support.
That's what I would do if I were in her place.
I would begin by nullifying outrageous acts from the federal government.
Get the people to understand who the good guys and the bad guys are.
Okay, do that to start with,
because they're going to vilify everything about you if you go into secession.
Straight away.
Then if they fight you on doing the right thing, then you say, well, we're going to have to declare our independence.
The purpose of government is to defend individual liberty.
And when a government, including a federal government, becomes destructive of those liberties,
it is the right and the duty of the people to alter or to abolish that
government.
So you try altering it first.
So,
uh,
conservatives in Western Canada pass a,
pass a law rejecting federal sovereignty.
This is a New York times article.
Uh,
I would subtitle it.
If at first you don't secede,
try,
try again.
Uh, so chafing at the COVID pandemic rules, oil-rich Alberta has ratcheted up the long-running schism between Western and Eastern Canada
by approving a bill allowing the province to ignore any federal laws and regulations that it opposes.
It's called nullification.
This is New York Times.
And of course, the New York Times is going to try to portray this as going straight to
secession.
No, they're going to start with nullification in reality.
A move that some critics, such as the New York Times, they will find people that they
can quote to push their narrative.
A move some critics described as unconstitutional and a threat to the basic fabric of the country.
The leader of Alberta's provincial government, Danielle Smith, she's the one I was talking about,
said it's not like Ottawa is a national government, she said, Ottawa being the capital of Canada.
She said, the way our country works is that we are a federation
of sovereign, independent jurisdictions.
Well, I don't know how the law is set up in Canada.
That is clearly the case in America.
That is clearly the case recognized in the Constitution,
in the 10th Amendment
the new law is the latest development reflecting an informal far-right effort in Western Canadian provinces mainly Alberta to secede from Canada says the New York Times underscoring just how
difficult it can be for poor Justin Trudeau in Ottawa to govern those poor guys.
I mean, you know, he just has to resort to tyranny in order to have his way.
Though Ms. Smith is not a member of any group participating in the secessionist movement,
sometimes called WEGZIT, Western EXIT, she has long espoused its driving view that the federal government is taking advantage of
Alberta. The New York Times says holding views considered extreme, even among Canadian
conservatives. I mean, you know, we got good Canadian conservatives like Jason Kinney. He
locks up pastors. And then we have these radical people like daniel smith who thinks that uh liberty matters according to
the new york times right uh miss smith has opposed all pandemic measures including vaccines and masks
she's looking better all the time her government has suggested alber Alberta's laws could be used to reject federal authority
and laws in several areas, including public health environment. That's the climate pandemic,
you know, the climate MacGuffin and firearms. That's it. Got the big three right there.
You got the pandemic MacGuffin, the virus MacGuffin, the climate MacGuffin,
and give me your guns. It's time for some nullification. Good for her. Anyway, she said,
I hope that we have sent a message to Ottawa that we will vigorously defend our constitutional areas of jurisdiction and they should just butt out.
But says the New York Times, political scientists and analysts say,
we found some people who agree with us and the government and the globalists. And so we're going
to quote them now against her. That's the tactic. They said the law is less about constitutional
jurisdiction than it is about attracting the secessionists and the anti-vaccination movements by tapping into a strain of anger.
Yeah, I mean, you know, anybody who wants to give liberty to the people, they're just a populist demagogue.
It's the true leaders of the country that resort to draconian methods for the good of the world.
Right?
That's the New York Times.
They didn't say that.
I'm saying that's mainstream media narrative.
For the good of the world.
We have to kill you all.
Right?
There's just too many people.
You guys are like a virus.
See, they see, it makes perfectly good sense if you understand this.
Someday I will go through my old tapes and I will find the video that I recorded in March of 2001.
Took the kids to the UK.
We were in the Children's Museum and they had this loop that was running in the
play area. And my boys were like eight or nine. And as they're playing, I'm watching this propaganda
film about Gaia theory and about the environment saying that Gaia is this living organization,
mother earth, that it's this pagan Greek idea. And that, um, it's a special thing that just
happened by accident and it's living and it's sentient.
This is why you've got these idiots in Hollywood saying,
Mother Earth is angry with us.
I mean, they're not.
They're serious about this stuff.
I mean, they live in Hollywood.
They work in Hollywood.
They deal in fantasies all the time.
They've got to get into the role.
But that's part of that video.
At LiveScoreBet, we
love Cheltenham just as much as we
love football. The excitement,
the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the
festival, we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to 10 euro
if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.
This is Total Betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
Take your business international.
Enterprise Europe Network is the world's largest network
providing free support and advice to SMEs with global ambitions.
With over 450 partner organisations worldwide, we bring together unparalleled expertise to serve businesses like yours.
We can help you discover partners in new markets, advance your digitisation and gain valuable insights into EU funding opportunities.
Take advantage of free expert advice and innovation resources.
Visit een-ireland.com and take your business global today.
They're portraying humans as a virus that was attacking Mother Earth.
We have to keep that under control.
Actually, we have to eliminate it, right?
And so it makes perfectly good sense when you look at the Trump shots, right?
The Trump shots were to eliminate a virus, the human race.
You understand?
There were depopulation shots to eliminate dirty humans
that are going to kill Gaia, Mother Earth.
So political scientists and analysts say the law is less about
constitutional jurisdiction than it is about getting an audience and getting a following and all this stuff.
These anti-vaccine people, these anti-depopulation people.
That's what you need to say when somebody says, you're an anti-vaxxer?
I'm an anti-depopulation person.
I'm against murder and sterilization. Okay. Oh, so, uh,
when a tap into a strain of anger and disenchantment toward the federal
government and toward Mr.
Trudeau in particular,
this is coming from a deep seated anger at the federal government and at
Justin Trudeau said a professor of political science in Calgary.
She clearly wants a fight with Trudeau.
Well, it's about time somebody punched him in the nose.
Uh, Trudeau for his part does not seem interested in taking the bait.
He could go to Canada's Supreme court and get a constitutional review, but there's
no sign that he plans to do that.
No sign that he's going to try to override the law or go to
the Supreme court in Canada?
Why would that be?
I don't know.
Like I said, I don't know what the Canadian laws are.
But I know why Jeff Sessions didn't take these states who were legalizing marijuana and doing other things that he didn't like with the war on drugs.
I know why he didn't take them to court because he would have lost.
He would have lost big time.
And I said this all through the Trump administration.
I said that SOB, Jeff Sessions, he knows as well as I do that you had a constitutional
amendment required to prohibit alcohol.
Where is his constitutional amendment for alcohol or any of these other things, including
fentanyl?
There is no authority for the federal government to prohibit fentanyl.
And I haven't gone into it, but this whole thing about Reason had a long article about this.
I think it was Reason.
Maybe it was Free Thought Project.
I didn't cover it.
You know, you had this phony video, and I say it's phony,
of this female police officer dying from fentanyl,
and they had to use some kind of, you know, whatever they use,
Narcan or whatever it is, to bring her back.
That's phony.
Phony as the rest of their drug narrative.
And I could go into the, maybe I should do that, tell people why.
But I'm not going to do it right now.
But the bottom line is the whole war on drugs is phony.
Where's the amendment to give them the authority?
Why did everybody go to all that trouble?
That's a lot of trouble to go through.
If you got, what is it?
The commerce clause they claim gives them the authority now to ban anything and everything they want.
No commerce clause was always there.
Commerce clause was there when they had to pass the 18th amendment.
Nobody, including the people who were for prohibition, uh, said that, um, they had the
authority in the constitution to prohibit anything without a special amendment.
And so Jeff Sessions did not take these people to court, did not try to enforce this
for the same reason that Trudeau probably isn't going to force this, because it would expose the
fact that the emperor has no clothes. They're acting fraudulently. They're acting under cover of law.
Come on, take it to court.
We've had that same fight with the so-called Johnson Amendment.
They want people to think that somehow Lyndon Johnson changed the Constitution and told
churches, you can't talk about politics in the pulpit.
Oh, yes, you can. talk about politics in the pulpit. Oh, yes, you can.
Democrats do it all the time.
There's just certain politics that they don't want you to talk about,
just like on Twitter, right?
And so Lyndon Johnson was not happy about how some churches had criticized him,
so he wanted to gag them.
So he got the IRS to put some stuff in their code to say,
we're not going to allow churches to talk about politics.
Oh, really?
Well, let's have that fight, said some churches.
And so you had one organization.
I interviewed them about 10 years ago.
They said, we're going to challenge this.
They got three pastors, and they preached from the pulpit politics,
said, here's who I want you to endorse in Juan, to vote for in Juan.
They did it explicitly, and they recorded it,
and they sent the tapes to the IRS and said, do something about it.
We want to have this fight in court because you're trying to shut
down the First Amendment.
And the IRS ignored it.
And they said, come on, you know, we violated the so-called Johnson Amendment.
Let's have this discussion.
Try to take away our tax exempt status because that's something that really scares churches because, you know, that has a lot of – if you take that away, then people who have donated to the church in years past, now they have donated to an invalid charity.
And it creates all kinds of problems for the people who go to the church as well.
So I said, come on, let's have that fight.
And the IRS didn't do it.
So the next year, they had a couple dozen people that did it,
or maybe 10 or something like that.
So they did it the second year.
And then the number grew to several dozen the third year.
IRS would not touch that with a 10-foot pole.
Jeff Sessions would not touch it with a 10-foot pole.
And I bet you Justin Trudeau won't touch this with a 10-foot pole. Jeff Sessions would not touch it with a 10-foot pole. And I bet you Justin Trudeau won't touch this with a 10-foot pole. Alberta now takes two large steps forward
to say that the existence of flexible federalism is grounds for the province to refuse in a direct
and frontal way the applications of federal law,
said a professor of constitutional law in Edmonton, Jason Kenney,
who resigned from his seat shortly after the proposed law was introduced,
issued a statement when he stepped down that was widely interpreted
as critical of Ms. Smith.
Well, you know, this is the guy who locked up pastors.
Our democratic life is veering away from ordinary prudential debate towards a polarization that
undermines our bedrock institutions and principles.
I couldn't think of a better way to describe Jason Kinney's actions as premier than that.
Projection is what he's involved in.
He's projecting what he did.
Undermining. polarization, veering away from the rule of law.
That describes Jason Kenney's administration for sure.
Critics of the law have included business and energy groups
because all they care about is money.
Money, the root of all evil.
They don't care about liberty.
They're usually allies of conservative politicians.
And so they said this could drive away investment.
This could cost the province jobs.
These are the oil companies that could be driven out of business.
It's like Glennon said, the capitalists will sell the rope that hangs them.
These people are going to side with the globalists and all this stuff.
When the globalists are trying to put them out of business. They're going to end their entire industry.
The Alberta government has long claimed that the landlocked provinces oil industry has been held back by the federal environmental rules that have frustrated attempts to build new pipelines or increase capacity of existing pipelines to U.S. imports.
You know, you have to wonder, you know, what's the long game that these oil company executives are playing?
Well, you know, they're getting in many of them on the ground floor, uh, already did on solar and other stuff.
That's why when Trump, the rumors were that Trump is going to put Rex Tillerson in, I
started tweeting at Trump at Alex, because I knew that he had a, an end to him.
And then, you know, who knows at the time we could still consider that Trump and Alex because I knew that he had an end to him. And, you know, who knows?
At the time, we could still consider that Trump and Alex were genuine.
We now know better.
But I was tweeting at both of them.
I got Alex angry.
Why are you tweeting at me?
You know, because you need to tell him this.
But, you know, Rex Tillerson pushed for homosexual scouts and the boy scouts.
But in terms of the climate, this guy is all about the climate agenda.
All about it.
He's going to push for this, and he did.
He and Ivanka got Trump not to do anything about the Paris Climate Accord.
Trump eventually said, all right, all right.
Um,
you know,
I'm not going to enforce it or whatever, but I'm not going to get rid of it.
And then finally he had some people on the other side who were explaining to
him what needed to be done.
He goes,
okay,
well we'll get rid of it,
but I'll do that the day after the election.
They never did anything.
So yeah,
they won.
But,
um,
I had all these people on Twitter.
I had all these, you know, idiot MAGA followers.
If you're a MAGA follower, you're an idiot at this point.
I'm sorry.
It's just, that's the case.
But back then they're telling me, well, you know, Rex Tillerson, how could you say that
he is for environmentalism?
He was president of Exxon or CEO or whatever.
I said, do you know what Exxon is doing?
They're on the ground floor of all this stuff.
They're one of the biggest pushers of this stuff.
They're going to make more money off of this stuff than anybody.
It's just like the car companies.
They don't want to sell cars.
They want to sell ESG.
They want to have the concession, the monopoly concession,
or the duopoly concession to control your movements.
They don't even call themselves car companies anymore.
They're mobility companies.
They've completely sold out.
Exxon had sold out.
There's all these people.
You can lecture me about, you look up the history of exxon you figure it out
i'm not making this stuff up it's a conspiracy but it's not a theory anymore
so the new york times says yeah this bad blood in alberta goes back to justin Trudeau's father, Fidel Castro.
Oh, I mean, Pierre Trudeau.
His supposed father, who was the prime minister between 68 and 84,
most of the time.
I guess it was some period of time when he was out.
He introduced sweeping national energy policy in the 1970s that reduced fuel prices in Canada, limited the profits of oil companies, limited royalty payments
collected by Alberta. So that's it, right? So this is just sour grapes on the part of Alberta
and the oil companies, except the oil companies, as New York Times points out, they're not necessarily
on board with this, the energy companies. The new law has also
provoked anger among indigenous groups in Alberta who say that it will undermine their rights under
the treaties that they signed with Britain before Canada's formation and that are now administered
by the federal government. Well, you know, if they want to stay with Canada, let the Indian tribes secede, right?
Like West Virginia.
And same thing I said about Crimea or the Donbass.
If Ukraine's going to secede from Russia, well, let Crimea secede.
But same reason, self-determination.
So if the Indians want to stay with Trudeau, let them stay with Trudeau.
But they don't want independence.
They want dependence,
I guess,
and they should go back and read Russell means book.
We're fighting more white men fear to tread because I think there's a lot of
Indians who fear to tread there as well.
Uh,
he said,
uh,
look,
the white look,
white man,
the, look, look, white man, the government has broken every treaty they ever made with us.
Your treaty is the Constitution.
And they've broken every aspect of that treaty as well, said Russell Means.
And he was right about that.
We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18 plus gamblingcare.ie
Take your business international.
Enterprise Europe Network is the world's largest network
providing free support and advice to SMEs with global ambitions.
With over 450 partner organisations worldwide,
we bring together unparalleled expertise
to serve businesses like yours.
We can help you discover partners in new markets,
advance your digitisation
and gain valuable insights
into EU funding opportunities.
Take advantage of free expert advice
and innovation resources.
Visit een-ireland.com
and take your business global today.
Stay with us. Succes! And now, the David Knight Show.
Geese Busters, Geese Busters.
Thank you very much for the tip on Rock Fan.
I guess those are Canadian geese that you're busting and shearing away up there.
So Rand Paul has his annual Festivus report that was put out on Friday.
$482 billion in government nonsense.
This is not waste.
This is pure nonsense you know you've got i remember
uh going back to the tea party right so disappointing to see people out there a
massive number of people who when i knew a lot of people who went from raleigh up to uh to washington
for that protest and um you know they just fill the streets up there.
It's like half a million people.
And yet, it's like, okay, so specifically what are you looking to accomplish?
I know that you believe that you're taxed enough already, you know, Tea Party.
But what is it that you want to do?
Do you want to cut spending?
Do you want to cut what the government is doing?
Do you want to cut taxes and increase the deficit?
You want to cut taxes without increasing what the government is doing?
I don't know.
I couldn't get any consensus from anybody that was involved in that.
Glenn Beck used that to make himself pretty big,
but there was absolutely no idea of what to do. No,
the formula goes back to Thomas Jefferson, his second inaugural address,
where he said by eliminating useless officers and, um, you know,
functions like, uh, Rand Paul was talking about in his Festivus report here, uh,
we were able to eliminate all internal taxes,
all internal taxes, so that no farmer, no laborer, no mechanic knows the tax man.
If you're going to import and export stuff
and take things across the border, then you would pay taxes.
But all the taxes, up until the time of Woodrow Wilson,
when they switched everything around,
got rid of the taxes on the border, the globalists did, and made all the taxes internal, created the Federal Reserve, created the income tax.
It was a complete inversion of the kind of freedom that we were given by Thomas Jefferson in his first administration.
So, yeah, I mean, you have to look at this and and say and so i was frustrated at the time because
you had the tea party tax enough already you had citizens against government waste
it's like well i'm sorry but you need to look at you know the useless things that the government
it's not just the waste it's not just the clownish stuff like this you got to eliminate
entire departments that are unconstitutional that's's my grievance. That's what I put on my Festivus tree. It's like we
eliminate these alphabet agencies and the idea that the president can rule by executive fiat
and that these unelected bureaucrats can assess fines against us that are excessive
because they say, well, they're not laws. They're rules. We made the rules. So it's not criminal.
It's civil and we can do anything we want. You have no presumption of innocence. You have no
right to due process and you have no protection protection against excessive fines and so we will create laws we'll have regulation without representation as well as taxation without
representation and we will come after you without any constitution so that's the real grievance but
let's talk about some of the silly stuff that government does 2.3 million dollars used by the national institutes of health for
an experiment uh injecting puppies with cocaine that was the uh no the the fauci thing 202 000
from the department of defense for starbucks espresso machines top of the line stuff. You know, because I guess this comes under the heading of alertness.
Yeah.
Coffee first, then save the world.
I think they could have just combined like the cocaine study and the espresso one and maybe just save some money somewhere.
Well, no, they got some more studies coming up.
All the different permutations of this.
Of course.
They'll give espresso coffee to puppies and watch how big their eyes get.
Oh, look how cute they are.
$3 million for the construction of a Gandhi museum.
The DOD wasted millions this year, including $28 million on camouflage uniforms.
They came up on camouflage uniforms.
They came up with camouflage uniforms that had a forest pattern to be used in the deserts of Afghanistan.
And when you walk around in the forest camouflage in the desert, you kind of stick out, you know, especially when you go the next step and you, uh, start attaching branch branches and leaves and stuff to yourself, you know, walking around the desert is like,
uh, anyway, uh, yeah, that's our defense department.
The same people are trying to pick a fight with everybody on earth.
The DOD also spent $192,000 on these top of the line Starbucks espresso machines.
$192,000.
Probably got, what, 10 of them or something?
$2.1 million to encourage Ethiopians to wear shoes.
You know, the interesting thing about that one is that that was done by the Human Genome Project.
What's the connection between the Human Genome Project and getting Ethiopians to wear shoes?
Are they saying that shoes...
Is Nike invested in the Human Genome Project?
Yeah, that's right.
What's going on here?
Adidas?
Is this you?
That's got to be it.
That's got to be it, yeah.
Air Ethiopians.
$1.1 million in training mice to binge drink alcohol.
Pinky, are you drinking what I'm drinking?
$519,000 using mice to study racial aggression.
These mice, they just won't leave them alone.
I don't know.
Is it white mice versus black mice?
We found that mice get more racist when they make them alcoholics.
This is a crazy study.
Yeah, exactly.
$187,000 to verify that kids love their pets,
unlike Fauci and the National Institute of Health,
which feeds them cocaine.
Kent State University had that study
to verify the relationship between pets and children
is beneficial to mental health.
Who knew?
Who knew?
How many puppies can you buy for $187,000?
They helped illegal immigrants avoid deportation. That was
Department of Homeland Security, $168 million for that.
To help them avoid the borders
that Homeland Security is supposed to be enforcing.
COVID relief funds to construct an 11,000 square foot spa.
$140 million for an 11,000 square foot spa.
$3 million to watch hamsters fight on steroids.
The universal fight club.
There's just one rule for a fight club
you gotta have your hamsters on steroids studying the romance between parrots
well you say you love me but do you really are you just repeating what you've heard me say
a radio campaign telling drivers to stop at railroad crossings two hundred thousand dollars
to tell people to stop at railroad crossing you know you just first i'd have to be listening to my radio so yeah and you
can't do that in electric car eric peters said you know they're shutting down am radio that's that's
bad i like am radio i thought maybe i'd go back on am radio someday but then everybody in their
electric cars ain't gonna have it so it's like cut off that way.
It's this is our government.
It's absurdly stupid and wasteful.
Again, the human genome.
Thinking about shoes.
And then there's this.
It's a good thing we got the TSA.
Because they apparently foiled some kind of an attempt that might have been like this underwear bomber trying to light his pants up and hopelessly incompetent.
Well, this is another person, perhaps.
This is hopelessly incompetent as the underwear bomber.
This is a guy who tried to smuggle gun parts, uh,
inside of peanut butter.
And,
um,
I guess,
you know,
maybe the,
maybe the FDA has got some rules against that is that the TSA was enforcing,
you know,
there are limits as to how much roten hair you can have in peanut butter.
Um,
you know,
cause they do allow it,
but there are limits.
So maybe there's limits as to how much gun parts you can have in peanut butter, um, you know, cause they do allow it, but there are limits. So maybe there's limits as to how much gun parts you can have in peanut butter.
As bearing arms said, TSA is not exactly one of the most beloved federal agencies,
probably not the most loathed.
And that's only because we've got the IRS, the FBI, the ATF, but they do serve a function.
Part of which is to keep things off of planes.
When we brought my daughter back from China,
she didn't speak any English and she's almost five years old.
So we went to a very amazing toy market.
I just went forever and they had every kind of toy you could think of and
everything was super, super cheap. And so we bought a lot of things to keep Karen did bought
a lot of things to keep her busy on the plane. And she had a whole bag of that. And we went through,
uh, security there and they went through one by one and she kept it hidden from her. You know,
we bought it on the slide. Uh, so there'd be new'd be new you know we could we knew she's going to have a difficult time
understanding what's going on you know this long long long plane flight and she didn't know what's
going on so we get to the tsa checkpoint type of thing of course it wasn't tsa but they were
following the rules that tSA projected out everywhere.
They even had, and the airport in English, if you are going to the United States, make sure that you get to your place earlier than if you're going to any other destination, because they give you the fine tooth harassment, you know?
So we get there and they go through the bag and they took everything out one at a time.
And she's like, oh you know and then
pitching it in the trash pull out another toy oh oh pitch it in the trash it's just the most
frustrating thing anyway and so then she cried for the entire trip coming back had no idea what
was going on and uh anyway so parts in this particular case in the peanut butter jar, parts of a gun were found inside jars of peanut butter by the TSA.
Well, you can't slip anything past these guys.
Can you 22 caliber gun parts are wrapped in plastic and jammed in the middle of a plastic peanut butter jars?
Well, that's good because you know, it's good that they put them in plastic because they had a magazine in there that was loaded with bullets.
And I was just kind of wondering what these guys were thinking if they put the magazine
in the peanut butter. So the magazine was loaded
and then put into the peanut butter. Somebody thought this was a winning strategy.
And as I point out... You know, you could really hurt someone if they got a peanut allergy.
That's right. Yeah. and as i point out you know you could really hurt someone if they got a peanut allergy yeah you're gonna wrap it in a swath of the bullets and peanuts hopefully a creamy peanut butter not chunky right but uh i guess you would have a peanut butter that would jam your gun
a bbj gun um jammed with peanut butter butter. Anyway, they, they point out, they said, well, you know, if, um, you're going to, this might
be a red flag.
If you were one of these really sharp TSA agents, because, you know, these guys are
really sharp.
They, they fail like 90 plus percent of the time, but even they could figure out that,
um, if you're going to be carrying food on the plane,
um,
maybe if it's something that's really rare,
you know,
some kind of local specialty or something,
but this is,
get that anywhere.
You don't that anywhere.
You don't need to,
that there would be,
you know, we we talked about how and these Christmas fairs
turning the lights on late
well San Francisco
they put together a little wonderland.
Got a lot of homeless.
You know, my family, there's got an audience of one parent with three kids
here's here's a lady doing something with pictures dressed up like mrs santa claus and she's got a
mask on and she does face painting she does face painting but she's got a mask on so uh they got
handmade gifts and all this other kind of stuff, but show some of the pictures that somebody else that took, uh, they went through and they said, um, they,
they went to the actual market and they showed these few vignettes that I just showed you
there.
And I panned around to see all the homeless people there in the streets and, uh, the drug
addicts and the rest of this stuff.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10
if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18 plus gamblingcare.ie
Take your business international.
Enterprise Europe Network
is the world's largest network
providing free support and advice
to SMEs with global ambitions.
With over 450 partner organisations worldwide,
we bring together unparalleled expertise
to serve businesses like yours.
We can help you discover partners in new markets,
advance your digitization
and gain valuable insights
into EU funding opportunities.
Take advantage of free expert advice
and innovation resources.
Visit een-ireland.com
and take your business global today.
Yeah, it's drug paraphernalia.
People sleeping in close proximity on the streets.
One person said she felt forced out because of the addicts.
This is the Winter Wonderland in Nancy Pelosi's hometown.
And they complained because people got shipped to L uh lala harris's uh area as a matter of fact at breitbart to point out that
uh you know these people coming across the border even in winter in texas are freezing because it's
so cold there right now and um so you're going to leave them it's okay for biden to allow them
to come across and sleep on the streets of el Paso and freeze to death. But we don't want to put them in front of Lala Harris's residence
and have them freeze to death.
Oh, that's horrible.
No, the problem is the border.
The problem is the incentives and the fact that they are not doing anything
to keep dangerous people out.
So that's the way they do it in San Francisco.
Don't you wish you were there?
And Moscow, they have a different way of doing things.
We're not talking about Putin's Moscow.
We're talking about Idaho's Moscow.
Moscow, Idaho.
There's a university there. There's also Doug Wilson's church that's there.
And it is Soviet Moscow in a lot of different ways.
They went to war with his church during COVID.
Do you remember that?
Remember when you had those people show up in public?
They used to do as a regular basis.
And again, it's a university town.
Very, very, very liberal.
And so, but they would do, the church would do open air sings on a regular
basis. And when they started with all of the COVID superstitions, they said, no, we're going
to continue to do that. And so you saw pictures of unmasked people singing hymns and masked armed bureaucrats
arresting them for singing hymns in the open air.
And so during the pandemic, Moscow, Idaho was one of the many cities where officials
simply took the law into their own hands and banned events such as church meetings.
In protest of lockdowns, the members of Christ Church,
and various outdoor psalm sings organized by Doug Wilson, pastor of the church. And this is where
the writer of the article got this wrong. They were not protesting anything. They were just going
about their life, exercising their freedoms, including their religious freedom. It's something that they did every week. So to get together to have a psalm sing was not a protest.
It was an exercise of their religious liberties.
One of his grandsons, also in the church, Roy, was threatened by police for standing
too close to his cousin without a mask.
These issues, various church members at the Sing were arrested and charged,
but they later dropped the charges.
The pastor's son, because they were going to fight them in court.
So they said, all right, never mind.
It's just like Jeff Sessions on his marijuana kick, right?
The pastor's son, Nathan, and his grandsons, Rory and Seamus,
created decals.
I covered this when it happened.
They're about three inches across, made out of vinyl.
They could be stuck to objects and they could be easily removed. But what the objects said was, Soviet Moscow, with a hammer and sickle on it.
And then they quoted the city's own lockdown slogan enforced because we care.
Somebody needs to do that in New York. You need to come up with some stickers in New York and say,
big brother is here to protect you or something, you know, whatever it was,
the exact quote that Eric Adams said yesterday I talked about.
The younger boys posted them on light poles
on parking poles on signs where other decals and other stickers and other handbills were or have
been posted in the past said the law firm um so uh then they came after these kids they said it is
an accepted routine practice in the small university city to post messages,
specifically including commercial messages, political messages, messages on matters of public interest,
on polls and on other city property throughout the city.
The city permits this practice.
It has created a forum for speech.
By doing so.
This is like Twitter.
You know, they said, you're letting everybody put this stuff up on polls.
That's accepted.
It's a public square now.
The boys, however, were given criminal citations.
Doug Wilson's grandsons were given criminal citations for their speech.
The city assigned workers also to remove those messages while they left
other messages on other subjects alone, including messages that attacked the church,
such as F. Christ Church. So now the American Freedom Law Center has filed a civil rights complaint on their behalf they said
the city's bias and prejudice against the wilsons their political and religious views and their
religious beliefs were evidenced by city prosecutors written exchanges in which she
described the wilsons religious community family as quote religious idiots unquote and Christ church, uh, a holes.
That's that's the professional city attorney, uh, the prosecutor's office saying that.
So, uh, the people representing, this is should be a slam dunk.
Uh, I said, it is a civil rights action brought under the first, the fourth, the fifth, and the 14th amendments to the Constitution.
Challenging defendants' unlawful actions and selective enforcement of the law that were motivated by the defendants' hostility as put in writing toward the plaintiffs and their political and religious viewpoints and their religious beliefs.
Again, it'll be interesting to see how this proceeds.
I think it'll be a slam dunk.
Guard Goldsmith.
Hey, guard.
How you doing?
Happy New Year to you.
I don't talk to you later on.
Guard Goldsmith.
Thank you for the tip.
He says, I just spoke with a chimney sweep furnace specialist who will now enjoy soaking in the show.
David, he was spot on about the lack of oil drilling
and refining about the centralized control system
dominating our energy choices
and where the government colossus is taking us.
To their preferred reservation-style slave plantation.
That's right.
Yeah, you want to go back and look at it.
I mean, the precedent of this is not like the Japanese internment camps
or the concentration camps of World War II in Germany.
No, it is a reservation.
It's an Indian reservation, your right guard.
I look forward to him spreading the word to others.
Well, thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
And so hopefully he will be spreading that to all the chimneys everywhere
that he goes.
He's going to be telling people about it as he cleans out their, their chimneys.
Maybe we can clean out their minds as well.
The air force Academy now has a lawsuit, a FOIA lawsuit from judicial watch for the same
stuff that we were talking about yesterday with the u.s military academy at west point people have asked them over and over again can we see your internal
information what you're doing about critical race theory you know because that's marxist ideology
it is racism you know are you oh no we're not doing well can we uh get some information about
that can you produce no i'm not going to produce the documents.
Air Force won't do it either.
So there is a lawsuit that's going to be,
but it's happening to all the military academies.
These people, this goes back to the Franklin School,
the Marxist intentionally, intentionally infiltrated institutions,
particularly higher education.
Because at higher education, if you grab it at
that point, it trickles down to all the schools. You've got the teachers who come through and
they're getting all this stuff and then they go back into the school to teach it. And so it's
like this recycling type of thing. And it intensifies with each successive generation.
It gets more and more intense. And so that's why you're seeing this kind of stuff pushed all the way down to kids now,
very young kids in elementary school.
But it is Marxism, and the Franklin School
intentionally did that,
intentionally went to Hollywood
and pushed the writers there
to insert their Marxist ideology,
their class warfare, and all the rest of the stuff,
race war, all the rest of it.
It's kind of funny that the Coen brothers even referenced that. Everybody knows that's what
happened in Hollywood. And so they even make a joke about the fact that the writers are full-blown communists in the movie Hail Caesar.
It's a real send-up of Hollywood.
All these people in Hollywood want to say, oh, well, you know, the McCarthy trials, that was just, there was nothing there.
No, there was something there, and it was deliberate.
And it started at the top.
They start at the top of the institutions and then get control of them.
Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch's president, said,
Marxist critical race theory and racial division
have no place in the Air Force Academy
that is training the next generation of Air Force leadership.
That's why it is so firmly entrenched there.
And that's why you've got the people in the Pentagon,
Austin and others who are pushing it there.
As per usual, the scandal is compounded by the cover-up of records
about the propaganda program that is abusing Air Force cadets.
Well, it is an established thing.
We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back,
I've got a couple of articles here about Christmas
and I've got a new song I want to play for you
when we come back.
Stay with us.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar,
and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to 10 euro
if your horse loses
on a selected race
that's how we celebrate
the biggest week
in racing
Cheltenham
with LiveScore Bet
this is total betting
sign up by 2pm
14th of March
bet within 48 hours of race
main market excluding
specials and place bets
terms apply
bet responsibly
18plusgamblingcare.ie
take your business
international
Enterprise Europe Network
is the world's largest network
providing free support
and advice to SMEs
with global ambitions.
With over 450 partner
organisations worldwide,
we bring together
unparalleled expertise
to serve businesses like yours.
We can help you discover
partners in new markets,
advance your digitisation
and gain valuable insights
into EU funding opportunities.
Take advantage of free
expert advice and innovation resources. Visit'll be right back. Thank you. ¶¶ And now, the David Knight Show.
Why do we love Christmas?
Asks Brad Littlejohn at World Magazine.
Why do we love Christmas so much?
And he compares it to other holidays.
He said, yeah, we got a lot of other holidays.
None of them is really as widely celebrated or celebrated for the length of time
and the depth of the celebration as we do with christmas
he said once a year rootless moderns and that's what got my attention we have a rootless society
and you know when you talk about radicals what do radicals want to do they want to change things
they want to rip it out at the root that's what the radicals want to do and They want to change things. They want to rip it out at the root. That's what the radicals want to do. And what they're doing at the Air Force Academy, what they're doing at West Point,
is to rip out heritage, to rip out history, to rip out culture, to rip out the past.
And that's one of the things that I think he's right about that. I think that's what makes Christmas so popular with people.
You look at it, as he said, we have with other holidays.
He said we've got Valentine's, Easter, Halloween.
We've got a lot of store displays.
There's a lot of commercialism involved with all those holidays,
but they only last for a day or a weekend, if at all.
But when it comes to Christmas, he says,
most of us can't seem to get enough of it.
From late November until early January,
we hang Christmas decorations, listen to Christmas music,
attend Christmas parties, bake Christmas goodies,
and, of course, participate in endless rites of gift shopping and gift giving. It'd be easy to cynically chalk this up to capitalism's
insatiable demand for customers and the determination of retailers to add as much
as possible to their bottom lines. But you know, that's something that happens with the other
holidays as well, right? He said, but something else is going on in this. In a world where, as Marx said,
all that is solid melts into air, where each and every anchor that is rooting us to the past has
been cut loose by revolutionary anti-culture. Christmas has become the only haven for tradition amidst a tempest of self-invention.
You know, I really think about this with the music. It's the only time of year where you walk
in, it doesn't matter what generation, people are listening to music from the 40s even, right? A lot
of music from the 40s and 50s.
We were listening to some music that's coming up on YouTube,
and I said to Karen, I said, think about that.
Everybody singing on this album has long since died.
And they're actually singing melodic stuff, with the rare exception that John Legend ruined a good Nat King Cole song
by adding his pathetic voice and narrative to it.
But it's interesting.
With that exception, this is all very old music.
It's about the only traditions we've got left in this country,
a country that's not very big on tradition and culture really everything is constantly tossed
out and it's designed that way as a matter of fact you know you go back that that kind of stuff
really didn't happen in this country until the mid-1950s we started intentionally started
intentionally creating this generational animus between parents and kids and, you know,
sort of the culture and entertainment did.
But one of the things that I think is interesting,
and one of the reasons why I'd like to do the Christmas music, I just,
you know, over the years I've played it.
And then the stuff that you hear me play here,
they're all things that I played either in bands or in, you know,
in marching band or concert band or things that I played on piano.
And so it's kind of nostalgic for me to go back and do it. And so there was a song that I added
to the Christmas album that I put out on the podcast, uh, and to the subscribe star people,
um, put it together on, um, I guess it was on, um, uh, put the album out, I think, on Christmas Eve, because I wanted to get this one more song finished that I was working on.
And this is, just to give you an idea, just to take a little bit of time here
and just kind of enjoy ourselves away from the news, the bad news.
This is a song that I was playing.
Actually, I was surprised. I looked at the date of it when I got this thing. It was, um, I was playing actually a surprise.
I looked at the date of it when I got this thing.
It was, um, because I got it when it first came out, it was an arrangement of five Christmas
songs that I played on the piano and it was 1971.
I thought, wow, that's 51 years ago, uh, that I got this.
Uh, and it's hard to even think about that. But anyway, it's been around for a long time.
And so I'm going to play for you what the piano version was, and I'm going to play for you what
I created out of it with orchestration. Because if I've got music for something, it's one of the
reasons why I can do more of the Christmas songs, because I've got a lot of music for those things.
If I've got music for it, I'll just play it on piano, and then I'll orchestrate it from that.
So think of the piano as kind of a pencil sketch.
And then from that, you can add in all the different colors.
So here it is first in the piano, and I've got a clip of the music.
If you read music, you can follow along. Thank you. Okay, so that's actually French,
but that particular arrangement,
it makes it kind of sound like an Irish jig or something.
But that's just kind of the background.
From that, I made this. Thank you. Okay, so that's the song is Bring the Torch, Jeanette Isabella.
That's not one person.
It's two different people.
Jeanette Isabella.
But Jeanette and Isabella.
And so for the visuals we have to have
for the show um those of you who are listening put in sparklers and people who are doing uh torch
skiing you know downhill skiing with torches at resorts uh and i just mentioned that because
it's just um you know one of the reasons that I can get through a lot of this stuff is because
I've got a lot of music for it at Christmas time. But part of it is just, uh, it really hit home
when I read this article that, yeah, that's one of the few traditions we have. And I had somebody,
uh, um, asked me a question about it and said, well, you know, that Christmas
is, was just arbitrarily picked as a date for Christ's incarnation. So why do you celebrate it?
You know better than that.
And it's like, well, I think that there actually ought to be more times that we have traditions
and celebrations, especially when it comes to the life and the work and the person of
Christ.
It's an opportunity to talk about that.
And the key thing that we have to be careful about is that we don't add
false details. And when the culture adds false details, what we would always do with our kids
is say, well, okay, the Santa Claus thing and all this stuff, that's, that's a detail that was added.
Uh, and, uh, you know, make a distinction between that.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement,
the roar, and the chance
to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free
sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest
week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march
bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
Even to talk about, well, what time of year might we guess that Christ was born?
Things like that.
So it actually presents an opportunity to look at things more deeply.
Were there three wise men?
Were there two?
Were there a multitude of them?
Right? Did they come at the time that Christ was born? Or did they come later? And all these other
things that gives you an opportunity to look into the text a little bit more deeply. And so I see
it as an opportunity, not something to run from. And, um, but we never did do anything about it. I said to
Karen, you know, when we talked about that and because I came from a family that, uh, did believe,
well, we're not going to celebrate that. You know, it's a, they're Protestant. It's a Catholic,
um, uh, thing that was done. So we're not going to celebrate that. It's like, well, I don't think so.
And I said, you know, I think we actually need to have more of these, you know, just as we have, we've got two holidays
to honor people in the military. You know, we have Memorial Day to honor the people who died
and Veterans Day, the people who served, whether they died or survived. So I said, why don't we
have holidays to honor people who have, for instance, martyrs, you know, people who died for what they believed.
You know, the term for martyr does not mean suicide bomber that was hijacked.
The term for martyr is Greek for witness. These are people in the early days who died rather than recount and to turn against what they said they had eyewitnessed.
And so it's one of the things that underscores the veracity of the Bible for us, the martyrs.
But of course, there were martyrs throughout history who died for what they believed.
They did not kill other people.
Typically, it was when religion got swept up with politics and then turned into politics
and started persecuting people because of religious beliefs,
because they implied that those religious beliefs
had something to do with their political allegiances.
And that typically was the basis for these types of things.
So going back to the article, he says it's a reminder of how deeply we all still need
something that ties us to the past. We yearn for the comfort of hearing and singing the same
familiar songs, baking and eating the same familiar recipes, gathering and giving the same familiar friends and families.
Gathering and giving with the same familiar friends and families.
We should not make a test of faith out of the Christmas tradition.
We should not fall into the temptation of imagining that there is one proper traditional
way to celebrate Christmas.
Every innovation would be hearsay.
No, not hearsay, heresy.
I'm sorry.
It's a very small print here.
That's my excuse.
I'm not getting old.
It's just small print.
I got to play for that.
Traditions are living, growing things with remarkable ability to assimilate one another much of what we take for granted as ancient christian traditions are comparatively new and startingly multicultural
in their origins he talks about how even the phrase merry christmas yeah i didn't know that
came from dickens christmas carol um i didn't realize um, that did not exist before that, but, uh, yeah.
And Dickens has a lot of, um, you know, he talks about caring for your fellow man.
Well, that certainly is a Christian value, but his theology is anything but Christian.
Uh, just like, you know, uh, it's a wonderful life, which I love is the, uh, the theology
that really took me a while to warm up to that movie uh but reason magazine of all
places says uh has an article against game of thrones christianity now that was a good headline
what is game of thrones christianity so that got me interested in reading it from reason it's
written by stephanie slade and a subtitle here is
the ends don't justify the means she says for many members of the so-called new right one thing is
clear classical liberal principles are not getting the job done that's true that's true a libertarian
view of government a live and let live view of government is not working anymore. What's broken with that? And in a sense,
these people that she's reacting to, the Christian nationalists that she's looking at,
many of whom are saying, well, we just need to force this on people, right? We've got the right
ideas, and so we need to force them. Well, if you're trying to force people, you don't have
the right ideas. You don't have the right ideas politically.
You don't want to become the monsters that you fight.
But you don't have the right idea from a Christian perspective either.
So, you know, what she's talking about, she sees as a rising problem with Christian conservatives,
what the mainstream media likes to call Christian nationalism.
It's not Christian at all.
Not at all. It's people who want to call Christian nationalism. It's not Christian at all. Not at all. It's people
who want to have their way. People who are going to force it on others, just like the left wants
to force their agenda on us. It's no different, actually. The left, after all, she says, has no
compunction about using the state to go after conservatives. As far as those illiberal
progressives are concerned, Catholic hospitals
should be forced by law to perform abortions. Social media companies should be threatened with
regulatory action if they don't agree to scrub their platforms of ideas and information that
are unfavorable to the Democrat Party. We've got a lot to talk about with that coming up.
So instead of a principled commitment to limited government and individual liberty, the argument goes conservatives who, quote, know what time it is, unquote, should be willing to use public power to attack their foes.
Anything less amounts to unilateral disarmament, armament, even suicide.
It's not uncommon to hear that the future of Soviet-style persecution awaits those who refuse to embrace a sufficiently muscular response.
It's a Game of Thrones vision, she says,
of politics as a literal war in which you win or you die.
So it's a cultural reference that I, you know,
I never watched Game of Thrones, not interested, but I understand.
It's a useful metaphor, but some of the things I don't really, anyway, win or die, I guess,
is the ethics of Game of Thrones.
So I would just say a sufficiently muscular response.
I would say to the Christians who are pushing this, you're a Christian.
Why would you leave God behind and try to do this in your own strength?
That's about the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my life.
We have weapons that are mighty.
There isn't anything that is mightier and bigger than God. And if we want to accomplish something, we have mighty weapons like prayer.
Because prayer connects us to a mighty God.
We can do far more.
Because what the problem with this country is, the problem is within us, just like G.K.
Chesterton said.
Yeah, I found the problem.
It's me.
And so we, each and every one of us, the problem has to work itself out from the inside of
us to work out.
You have to change people.
Only God can do that.
We can point them to God, but only God can change people. Only God can do that. We can point them to God, but only God can change hearts.
And so if we are looking to classical liberalism, it would be good for us to remember what the
founders said. Here's a republic, and you're not going to be able to keep it unless you have a
moral people. Well, where does that morality come from?
It's like C.S. Lewis said, well, I don't like injustice in the world,
so I don't believe in God.
Well, where did you get this sense of what is right and wrong?
So the new right rhetoric is saturated with talk of the need to restore traditional Christian virtue by force if necessary.
Law professor Adrian Vermeule,
journalist Sohrab Amari, she says, are Catholic converts who dream of subordinating civil
government to the church in pursuit of, quote, a public square reordered to the common good,
unquote, and possibly even, quote, the eventual formation of the empire of Our Lady of Guadalupe, unquote.
Well, I have not read those guys, so I'll go with her characterization of it.
If that is what they're saying, then I would just remind them that, again,
we has met the enemy and the enemy is us, said Pogo or J.K. Chesterton.
You know, I am the problem.
We have to have, it is something that begins with us, inside of us.
We fix our individual lives.
We work with our families to the extent that we can.
And then it, to our neighbors, to our community, to our state,
to the national government, to the international.
It's an expanding thing like ripples in a pond.
But it begins with you.
Cast out the moat that's in your own eye
before you try to cast it out of other people.
A bad tree is not going to bear good fruit.
You've got to change from the inside,
and only God can change the nature.
The leopard can't change its spots,
but God can. The new rite implies that religious traditionalists have a choice. They can either be
ones inside the gulag or they can make sure their enemies are the ones inside the gulag.
She says Jesus would have never accepted that bargain. He said, love your enemies,
pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your heavenly father. He said, love your enemies, pray for those who persecute you,
that you may be children of your heavenly father. That is, she said, probably the most radical words. Well, it's not the most radical words. It's probably the hardest words to live by.
Some of the hardest ones. But it's not the most radical of what Jesus said or did,
not by a long shot. Because Jesus didn't come to give us a code of conduct.
We already had that in the law of Moses.
Problem was nobody could follow it.
And then Jesus came and made the problem even bigger.
He said, oh, by the way, you're angry with somebody?
Well, you've committed murder with him in your heart already.
So he made the standard even higher.
But he lived a perfect life.
He came to die for us to fulfill the law that we could not fulfill.
And to take away our shortcomings, that's the radical thing about Christ.
That's the radical thing about Christ.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Christmas. We'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, I've had a lot of people ask us about Scout.
Before I get into the weather here and the climate and the climate MacGuffin,
I just tell people, yeah, Scout has aged quite a bit with that attack that nearly cost him his life.
But he's back and he's enjoying the cold weather quite a
bit. Uh, we had a lot of snow yesterday and he was outside all day chasing snowflakes, uh, trying to,
uh, bite them as they were coming down. He has a thing about smoke. If anybody is smoking around
him. Uh, and I think it happened because Karen used to play with him with, um, uh,
bubbles, you know, put bubbles out and he would chase them. And, uh, and so he does that with
smoke when he sees it. And so it's been super cold here. And, um, he was outside the other day
and he noticed that his breath was smoking. So this is like a, an endless feedback loop for a border colleague.
He spent all day and here's a little picture of him, uh, chasing his own breath and trying
it's not for me to go back up again. So he spent all day doing that. And then it got even better
because then it started snowing and he had more to chase, uh, than just his smoking breath. But, um, so he's enjoying the weather quite a bit, but, uh, other people are not.
And, uh, the bomb cyclone, I love that they came up with this name, the bomb cyclone,
but it's a very serious storm.
They say the death toll has risen to 57 people.
Um, a lot of them in the Buffalo area, uh, people dying, uh, being, you know, dying, dying inside of their cars.
As a matter of fact, going back to Buffalo in 1977,
my brother-in-law was, Karen's twin brother was going to school
in that record storm in 1977.
And they had one, people dying in their cars.
They had one person died in front of a house.
I mean, he didn't even know where he was.
The storm was so bad.
The car was covered up with snow, and it took them a while to find out that he was there,
but he already died from the snow.
The snow plows came and made this big bank of snow over his car.
It took a while for them to find out where he was, but they've now got 57 people.
That's why I was surprised that the death toll they had for Texas two years ago in January
or February storm, 200 people in Texas.
So most of the 57 have been in and around Buffalo.
Um, and again, they're finding, uh, drivers, uh, dead in their car. Uh, he was,
uh, he died in his car and was buried in his car for quite some time, uh, in Buffalo back then,
but there's also power stations. They're being vandalized. And a lot of, uh, news organizations
have picked this up. And you remember when this happened in North Carolina, all of the left were
immediately saying, well, you know, that that's conservatives because they were going to have a drag queen show and the conservatives
knocked out power to stop that drag queen show.
Most ridiculous thing I've ever seen in my life.
But, you know, it was done with gunshots.
Only conservatives have guns, right?
And conservatives don't like drag queen shows.
So the conspiracy theorists on the left and in the mainstream media laid it at the foot of conservatives. But it's been happening
in a lot of different places. It's been happening in the Pacific Northwest and other places. This
electricity that was cut off for thousands as four power stations were vandalized. This happened up in Washington state near Tacoma.
Vandals broke into three power substations,
damaged the station's electrical equipment,
causing some 14,000 Tacoma residents to lose their power.
Now I'm looking at this and I'm thinking,
does this sound like something that conservatives would, I mean,
they've got, I'm sure they've got drag queen shows that are going on in Washington and Tacoma all the time, right?
Especially for kids.
I think when you look at this, who is it that hates power stations?
Is it conservatives who hate power stations or is it the radical left that hates power stations?
Is the radical left up in Washington and Oregon, are they known to invade and destroy buildings and structures and statues that they don't like? Well, yes, they are. Will anybody but me say that?
Certainly not the mainstream media. I'm just, this is just a hunch.
You know, if I was a detective, they'd be at the top of my list interview,
uh, to look at these people.
So, uh, there was three different power stations that were broken into
vandalized, pick out the power for thousands of people.
I think it was up to a 14,000.
Yeah.
14,000 Tacoma residents lost power.
More households experienced power outages after a fourth substation was attacked.
And then a fire broke out at the scene on Sunday night.
It's unknown if there were any motives or if this was a coordinated attack on the power system, said the sheriff's department.
No, it's just a coincidence, right?
It's no conspiracy because they're going to look the other way if it's leftists who are in the...
It sounds like something in the last generation.
These people who are gluing themselves to the roads and to the conductor's podium in Germany,
cutting off the tops of Christmas trees and the rest of the stuff that they're doing.
That sounds like somebody like that, you know, throwing paint on paintings and stuff like that,
vandalizing paintings and museums. Why wouldn't they go to the source of their frustration and
anger? A power station. Nobody says what kind of power station this is, but you know, it's not windmills, right?
It's a power station.
You know,
that it's not solar.
There's not a big field.
They didn't vandalize any windmills.
I didn't joust with them.
They did not mess up any solar panels.
They went to a power station.
So I don't know if it was,
um,
something that was relaying the power or if it was a generation station.
But it was not, they were not attacking windmills or solar panels.
And they all happened at the same time.
But of course, you know, we can't say there was a coordinated conspiracy here if they all happened at the same time.
There's nothing to see there, right?
The Sheriff's Department referred to the first three incidents as burglaries,
but they said nothing was taken.
So I guess it's a burglary if you just break into something technically. I don't know if anybody spotted Pelosi with a hammer anywhere or his friends.
In November, two power stations in Washington State were attacked,
which caused the FBI to begin looking into the events.
Similar events at electricity substations in Oregon and in North Carolina
have been reported to the Bureau, the FBI,
and to Washington State law enforcement people.
But, you see, they ignored all of these previous events that had happened in the Pacific Northwest
and places like that.
And when there was a power station that was shot up in North Carolina, oh, that has to
be the conservatives.
Has to be the conservatives, right?
So, take a look at the people who have motives. Earlier this month, the utility
in North Carolina reported outages from what local authorities said were orchestrated shootings.
If they're going to lay it at the feet of conservatives, it's orchestrated.
But we don't know what happened in Washington State.
The FBI has also been investigating
shots fired near a power facility in South Carolina
days later, and whether those two incidents could have been related, uh, says a mainstream
media, NBC news and others.
Meanwhile, in Buffalo, where the snow is so bad, looting has broken out.
Imagine that, um, looting a Buffalo being significantly downplayed by local media.
That would be because of who was doing the looting.
Just like who is doing the shooting at power station.
Well, you know what?
I mean, this is, you know, we got any conservatives, right?
Well, no.
Okay.
Let's just downplay this thing here.
New York state police confirmed reports of two looting incidents,
but judging from footage that's all across social media,
it appears to be very widespread,
but they're just only going to talk about two of them.
Because everything has been shut down,
because people can't do much with their cars,
that includes the police, and the police are busy, I'm sure,
with other things as well.
Probably power lines being taken down by falling trees and maybe ice things like that crooks took
advantage of the empty streets where snowfall and blizzard conditions made roads impassable and in
this particular picture you see a cop car and the road is completely blocked with a down tree there.
Uh, Ralphie D thank you very much.
I appreciate the tip on rock fan says, uh, thank you, Dave, for all you do.
Hope you had a blessed Christmas with your family.
We did.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
Thank you for the, uh, for the support and the good wishes.
Appreciate that video on social media allegedly shows a pair of thieves exiting a store in the middle of the brutal winter night.
Moments later, the woman behind the video seems to capture what appears to be gunshots as people on the street run for cover on the snow filled sidewalks.
Yeah, it's interesting.
Um, you know, we got stuck in a massive snowstorm in Buffalo on Thanksgiving 2000.
And, you know, it was, you didn't see this kind of crime that was happening there in those few days.
Things are changing, aren't they?
Some victims are found frozen to death in their cars.
A 56-year-old father was found dead on the street, died on his birthday a video later emerged of a dead man lying down in the snow that was identified as him they said the police are still
trying to retrieve his body in blizzard conditions and yet you got people
looting in those types of conditions truly amazing to see what is happening with our country and another concern about what happens
in a society that has no moral foundation. It's getting more and more dangerous for everyone.
There's an excellent article. I'm not going to go into a lot of detail,
but I would recommend this to you. This is from the organicprepper.com, Daisy Luther.
Staying warm during a winter power outage.
This is something that is good advice for everybody in every country
because our governments have no intention of upping the power on the grid.
As a matter of fact, they're shutting it down,
and they're putting more and more unsustainable loads on the grid.
And so this is going to be an ever-increasingly important thing to think about.
And, of course, she starts, first of all, with different sources of heat, wood heat, the obvious things like wood.
Talks a little bit about propane heaters, how they work, what you're going to need to have it.
Make sure you're going to get a larger unit that can warm up to 200 square feet, or you can have something that they're legal for indoor use in 49 states.
Also kerosene and oil heaters that can do a larger area.
But she points out that you'll want to get, if you get some of these things that you bring in, you want to have some kind of, just for safety, you want to have some kind of a carbon
monoxide alarm if you're going to burn something like that in the house, uh, talks about natural gas,
fireplaces, pellet stoves, things like that in the article, but then has, um, what if
you don't have a secondary heating method?
Power goes out.
You don't have any, any wood, you don't have propane, nothing like that.
Well, what can you do in those circumstances? Well, you know, you fallane, nothing like that. Well, what can you do in those circumstances?
Well, you know, you fall back, you heat only one room, you do, um, obvious
things like cover your windows, but even have a camp out, you know, uh, pitch a
tent, you got one in one room, get everybody in there, um, and you can, you
know, play games with the kids or, you know, just enjoy a make-believe, uh, uh, camp out inside of your home, but you get a smaller unit is the idea.
Um, you know, even lighting a candle, uh, brings warmth to a small area, but of course you have to be careful with open fires like that.
Uh, this I thought was kind of interesting.
I had not thought of it.
I thought a lot of those things, but not of this. Heat some rocks outside and then put them into a cast iron Dutch oven or something like that and bring it into the room where the stones will passively emit the heat.
You don't have to worry about anything like carbon monoxide poisoning.
So there's a lot of really good advice.
I would recommend that for the times that we live in organic prepper.com. It always has a lot of good advice
about things, um, you know, layering your window, using rugs, using rice bags for certain things.
Um, and so, um, and then talks about icy roads and a lot of things like that. So there's much for us to learn in this future world
where there's an abundance of high technology,
but it's only used to watch and control you.
And they take away the essentials for our own lives.
At the same time, as they move us back into the dark ages, into medieval existence, but then impose
an unbelievable level of science fiction surveillance and control on us on the other side.
Stay with us.
We will be right back. Terima kasih telah menonton Thank you. © transcript Emily Beynon You're listening to The David Knight Show.
All right, let's talk a little bit about what's going on
on the pharmaceutical side of things.
As I mentioned at the top of the show,
there are some very disturbing trends that are happening now
in pharmaceutical
that goes beyond the mRNA vaccines, the warp speed vaccines, because they've got more mRNA
shots.
They're not stopping with a COVID shot.
That was just the introduction.
They're looking at setting up mRNA vaccines for all kinds of conditions.
Excuse me.
And,
um,
they are ready to roll them out right now,
as well as nanotech to presumably attack disease,
but perhaps also to attack your body.
ABC news this week,
producer who produced a show for George Stephanopoulos,
37 years old died suddenly. Uh, this is, producer, you produced a show for George Stephanopoulos, 37 years old, died
suddenly.
This is what we're seeing over and over again.
Every day, there's now a celebrity or somebody who is widely known that we see this happening
to on a regular basis.
It is truly amazing to To see how many people.
Are dying suddenly.
So we have a government reports.
That are inadvertently telling the truth.
About vaccine failure.
This is coming out of the UK.
Once again.
We've got an influenza outbreak.
Says a writer at daily skeptic. We've got a high incidence of RSV.
We've got strep a threatening the old and the young.
We've also got a new tradition for the last couple of years.
Now is the time where we have a senior representative of the government that has chosen to tell everybody to refrain from enjoying themselves over the holiday period in order to save the national health system in the UK,
and to remind everybody to try to receive as many vaccines as their arms can handle.
Perhaps it's a good time to discuss how well the COVID vaccines have been helping to reduce infections, he said,
hospitalizations as well as deaths, according to data in the UK's HSA vaccine surveillance report.
It wasn't until early September 2021 that they started to include actual vaccine surveillance data in the vaccine surveillance report.
I've often wondered why they started to offer these data as even in that September report,
the data did not support the narrative that vaccines are good.
The data on infections that was first presented in the report, September 2021, was troubling.
It showed an incidence rate of COVID in the vaccinated that was higher than that seen in the unvaccinated for those over the age of 40.
Well, they tried to explain that away with some footnotes.
Don't believe the data that we give you.
Listen to how we interpret that.
Six vaccine surveillance reports later, the situation had deteriorated even more,
with rates in the vaccinated higher than in the unvaccinated for all those aged over 30,
with significantly higher rates for those aged 40 to 60.
So it started getting worse.
After a few more weeks of the apparent deterioration of the vaccine's protection,
the UK HSA gave up on the charts, presumably because they were too easy to interpret.
As a matter of fact, show some of the people, scroll there, there you go.
You look at a chart and it can be pretty clear right um the
unvaccinated are the ones in black and you can see with every age group except under 18
i'm sorry 18 to 29 as well um the uh uh it is uh significantly higher uh for the vaccinated, that is for the unvaccinated.
Now, these are cases.
Again, PCR test.
So when they got to this kind of situation, they put a stern warning in bold as a disclaimer.
These raw data should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness.
Oh, yes, I know it looks like it's not working,
but we're going to tell you that it is.
Their polite request not to look at the real world data with an open mind hid the real
problem, that they preferred to believe that it was the real world that was wrong, and
that their cleverly constructed experimental studies were right, despite there being a
lack of evidence supporting those experiments' core
assumptions.
The last set of data on infection rates strongly suggested the vaccines were significantly
increasing the risk of infection.
Of course, the UK HSA were keen to suggest that the differences seen between vaccinated
and unvaccinated infection rates were actually due to, well,
anything that they could think of that wasn't the vaccines.
So they said things like, well, people who are fully vaccinated,
people who are unvaccinated may behave differently.
You know, as we've seen the comedian say, oh, I'm vaccinated.
I'm going to go over here and start licking poles and chairs and stuff like
that. I'm now invulnerable.
Well, there may have been a little bit of that, but still,
there's people who have never been vaccinated or more likely to have caught
COVID-19 in the weeks or the months before the period of cases covered in the
report.
This gives them some natural immunity to the virus,
which may have contributed to a lower case rate in the past few weeks.
Ooh, wait a minute.
There's their disclaimer trying to say, don't believe what you see in our own data showing
that the vaccinated are testing positive more frequently than the unvaccinated by a significant
amount.
No, no, no.
Don't believe that.
Here's how we explain this.
These unvaccinated people may actually have natural immunity,
which works, unlike our vaccines, which don't work.
How does that help them with their vaccine narrative?
I mean, they were denying natural immunity for the longest time,
and now they're trying to say, well, you know,
the problem is these people have natural immunity,
so that's why it's looking good.
Well, then that just points the finger back at the vaccine again,
saying it doesn't have lasting immunity, but natural immunity is lasting,
and we know that.
But they left one potential reason out, that they'd used a poorly tested
vaccine that may have resulted in an increase of infections,
negative vaccine effectiveness, not to mention all of the non-respiratory
illnesses that are killing people,
crippling people.
He says, we're now nine months from that last table of real-world data on COVID infection
by vaccination status.
In the meantime, studies from around the world continue to suggest that the vaccines increase
the risk of infection. He says recent data from something they have in the UK called the ZO symptom
tracker shows a remarkable correlation between infections with COVID and
infections that have similar symptoms to COVID, but aren't COVID.
What he means by that is they didn't get, um is they didn't get a positive PCR test.
And what they found was on a single day, December 19th,
they found around 0.4% of the population developed a new non-COVID respiratory illness.
So you got a respiratory illness.
What they mean by that is you don't get a positive PCR test.
That's 0.4% of the population.
While around 0.15% of the population developed an infection,
a respiratory illness, and tested positive.
So you've got three times the number of people with a respiratory illness
and no positive PCR tests. And even here, they don't mention what the cycle threshold of magnification is.
Have they changed that?
I don't know.
I mean, they were, if they still have this at 1.1 trillion times
magnification, that's what a cycle threshold of 40 is. And they're still not getting positive,
um, COVID, uh, positive PCR tests of this. And that's pretty amazing. But three times
the number of people have some kind of respiratory illness, a cold or a flu or something like that, as opposed to people who are testing positive on this.
And they want to now try to bring back all of this pandemic.
And I'm going to show you how they are here in a minute,
because they've got all the legal bases still there.
We're now on 1,0 you know, a thousand 20 days of, uh, this executive
order and it's not going away.
And there's no Republicans talking about getting rid of it either.
Uh, one or two have talked about it, but the Republican party for
the most part just ignores it.
They like having that medical martial law.
So the government is going to stop publishing that data and they're going to
stop publishing their COVID modeling in the UK.
They said it's a part of the government's normalization
of a COVID-19 society. You see, they got what they wanted.
They had a psychological operation and they don't need to keep that going.
As a matter of fact, it's getting kind of tiresome to a lot of people
and there's going to be a blowback.
So let's pull back and not do that anymore because we've established
our presumed legal usurpations to be able to do this to you in the future.
And we have already psychologically set a precedent for you that this is something that you're going to be willing to do.
No matter how absurd it is, you're going to do it.
Whether it's masks or vaccinations, we tell you the masks and vaccinations don't protect you.
They protect other people.
So you'll do it.
Right.
So we've accomplished what we want to do in terms of moving the Overton window here. Let's just back off before the people get really angry and we get a lot of blowback from that.
And we'll move on to the climate MacGuffin or something.
So they said, this is happening, says the Daily Telegraph in the UK as the UK moves away from the now culturally ingrained hyper awareness
of epidemiological fluctuations.
I call that fear, fear, fear is now culturally ingrained and inordinate
amount of trust and self proclaimed experts and authorities has been ingrained.
They call it hyper-awareness of epidemiological fluctuations.
No, it's fear.
It's psychological conditioning that has been ingrained in people.
They've done their work.
They're moving on to other tactics.
And we have, uh,
you know,
people like Ben Shapiro,
it's now safe for Ben to come out and oppose the vaccines. And he's done that with some very strong language.
And he had another interview with,
um,
Robert Malone.
First,
he had made a confession.
Um,
it was a couple of weeks ago.
I covered it.
Ben Shapiro,
who is somebody who always supported the vaccines.
I mean, they were put out there by Trump and MAGA likes Trump.
So let's support whatever Trump does because we want to have that MAGA audience.
Right.
And so he told everybody they were good.
As a matter of fact, he was double vaxxed himself.
He admits, he says his wife, who is a physician was triple vaxxed.
Avoid if you live in Nashville or wherever he lives, he lives in Florida,
I think even though the organization's in Nashville,
but if you live where Ben Shapiro lives, avoid a doctor,
a female doctor named Shapiro.
She was foolish enough and ignorant enough and gullible enough to take three shots without any critical thinking, without any questioning, without looking at any studies, without looking at any alternatives, without understanding what natural immunity is.
His wife is a physician.
Avoid those kinds of physicians.
But it wasn't his fault.
It wasn't Ben Shapiro's fault.
And it wasn't his physician wife's fault.
They were lied to.
They were misled.
You know, just like President Trump.
They shouldn't have to know how this stuff works. Right.
So,
um,
he,
uh,
now,
so his first thing was to be a supporter.
His next thing was to get it himself.
But then when it was Biden,
he did what all the GOP establishment is doing.
And that is to oppose the mandate.
We're going to oppose that mandate.
Yeah.
You know, I mean, um, we got to have, uh, uh, people with informed consent,
except, uh, they're shutting down all the information about the vaccines.
And so he opposed the mandate because that was a Biden thing and it was a safe
thing to do.
Now he says, this is where Ben Shapiro is now.
He says, quote, everyone involved should be thrown out of office. If they're in the private sector, they should be fired.
There should be criminal prosecutions. If, uh, they are disseminating false information to the
public with zero evidence. Oh, wait a minute. Did Ben Shapiro disseminate information for two years?
Did he put out the party line?
Did he put out the Trump line?
Did he put out the GOP line?
Well, the vaccines are good.
Just don't force people to take them.
Was he disseminating misinformation without doing any investigation?
Was his wife involved in malpractice?
Vaccinating people was something that she didn't know anything about.
And now regrets.
Oh,
we were just misled.
I was just following orders.
I was just following the information I was giving given.
It just amazes me how big his platform is.
You tell people what they want to hear,
and you grease the skids for the political operatives,
and there's just no telling how far you can go in this life, is there?
In this life.
And so now it's safe for him to challenge the jab,
because the narrative has turned,
and they're going to move us on to something else
after they've ingrained the fear, the inordinate trust and authority and, uh, their arbitrary usurp to
power. They're going to, uh, now move on to something else where they can use all those
things against us. So he has Robert Malone on and, uh, in teasing the interview, Ben Shapiro says at first Malone assumed that the FDA had been hoodwinked by Pfizer.
But he now believes that the FDA was part of the propaganda machine from the beginning of the pandemic.
Whoa, really?
Wow.
This is why I'm not even tried.
I'm sure he wouldn't want to come on with me.
That's why I've not even tried the interview Malone.
It's a limited hangout.
Come on.
Seriously.
You never saw you're somebody who worked in this field.
You never saw FDA corruption before Malone.
And you don't see it now.
I mean,
I would think that even if you're,
you know,
kind of focused on your little narrow thing that you're doing here, you don't see it.
And a lot of people are that way.
I'm not criticizing that.
I mean, a lot of people get very narrowly focused on something.
They don't see the bigger picture.
But at this point in time, if you realize that the FDA has lied to you about this stuff, maybe you might want to start broadening your perspective a little bit and look at how they've been doing this for decades.
One of the reasons why I was able to spot this from the beginning,
because they run this same thing over and over again.
They run this annual flu nonsense.
They were running that scam, not to mention the germ games and all the rest of
this stuff.
So he still doesn't see the past of the FDA.
He only sees the jab.
I say,
be careful about limited hangouts.
Now,
Brian,
she'll have you to a vaccine impact.
Ted,
this,
uh,
the changing the president won't matter.
Who is really running the country?
Well,
it's the unelected bureaucracy,
right?
But he had, this is interesting because he had katherine
austin fitz who i've interviewed in the past she's she's gone on several times with um
greg hunter of usa watchdog i don't know greg hunter i've never seen any of his content i have
seen that his interviews with katherine austin fits are always put up on, um, zero hedge. So he submits
the interview with Catherine Austin fits and, and they post it because they like Catherine Austin
fits. I haven't, haven't done that, but, um, with any of my interviews, but, um, and I've
interviewed her several times in the past. Uh, she is spot on spot on. I have the highest regard for Catherine Austin Fitz.
She understands and she tells the truth.
You can't ask for anything better than that.
And so what was interesting is that as they were talking about the vaccine,
because usually Catherine Austin Fitz is talking about financial issues and
she's talking about the coming CBDC and other things like that, but they got on the vaccine. Because usually Catherine Austin Fitz is talking about financial issues, and she's talking about the coming CBDC and
other things like that. But they got on
the vaccine. And
so on
Vaccine Impact, you'll see
a partial transcript of this.
Listen to this. So Greg Hunter says to
her, said, you know, they're still going after
Donald Trump, who wants to
destroy the new world order.
And Catherine Austin Fitz says, well, but wait a Donald Trump who wants to destroy the new world order. Uh,
and,
uh,
Catherine Austin Fitz says,
uh,
well,
uh,
but wait a minute.
He put $10 billion into a military program to depopulate Americans.
Come on,
Greg,
I'm going to be a tough guy about this.
She got it.
She understands operation warp speed was a military operation.
Its purpose is to depopulate, not the U.S., but the world.
And she goes, seriously?
You think that he wants to destroy the New World Order when he did something like that?
So Hunter says, do you think he was told the truth, though?
So you go back and forth.
Is he playing 4D chess and lying to us, but he's really lying to them?
Or is he just an idiot?
All right.
This is, this is the two polls that Alex Jones jumps back and forth.
And a lot of people, Greg Hunter, one of these, right?
So Fitz comes back and says, so if you look at the history of what's known, it takes 10
to 12 years to test out a vaccine, to make sure that it's safe.
Everyone knows that.
Hunter says, so you actually think Donald Trump actually knew?
Hey, we're going to depopulate and murder off a bunch of people?
See, I don't.
I think he was lied to, and he missed this.
This is the position that is now Alex's official position. Fitz says, if there was one person who understood how dangerous vaccines are that was in political life, it was Donald Trump.
Because this was a big issue during the campaign.
And he made a big issue about the dangers of vaccines, so he knows.
Now let me interject here.
Donald Trump has been one of the most cynical people about vaccines because he left all these hints around vaccines and autism
and all the other stuff.
And then in the transition period, he brings in RFK Jr.
And you know what he was doing? He was essentially threatening
Big Pharmaceutical. Bringing in RFK Jr. was only so that he could threaten Big Pharma
to get them to pony up a lot of money to him because that's exactly what happened.
He brought in RFK Jr.
RFK Jr.
said, well, nothing really much happened.
And, but except right away, big pharmaceutical made a major donation to Trump.
And then what happened was Trump put in as head of HHS, one of the most politically
connected CEO, one of the most politically connected pharmaceutical companies, Eli Lilly,
Alex Azar from Eli Lilly, the CEO of Eli Lilly. So connected that going back to 2005
when George Bush was putting all kinds of things in law
to protect the pharmaceutical companies,
Eli Lilly came in and got a special writer that they wanted.
They called it the Lilly Writer.
Eli Lilly has been one of the most politically connected
pharmaceutical companies.
Big donation from the pharmaceutical industry to Donald Trump because of RFK
Jr.
And then they get their guy in charge.
He is a cynical power grabber.
He knows how to play the game.
This is a guy who went from a millionaire to a billionaire in New York.
He knows how to manage the corruption game,
the art of that deal,
the art of political deals and corruption.
So then when she says, wait a minute, he knows about vaccines.
He talked about vaccines.
He knew about the dangers of them.
He talked about it quite a bit in the campaign.
If anybody in political life knew about vaccines,
it was Donald Trump.
Hunter comes back and says, so you think he knew ahead of time?
You think he knew going into it that we're going to depopulate people?
See, I just don't believe that.
She says, well, I'm going to be a tough guy because I knew the injection program stunk.
I knew it was dangerous and I knew there were different nefarious agendas that could go on.
And I said to people as soon as the virus started or as soon as they claimed that there was a virus,
because I think it was more than one thing going on, I said, don't worry about COVID.
Worry about the injection.
Don't take the injection, whatever you do.
Yeah, I said that as well.
Right?
Worry about the lockdown.
Worry about the politics of this.
And the purpose of the lockdown is to get you the injection.
That's what they've been practicing since 2001, Dark Winter.
He went on to say, so if I knew that in March 2020,
I'm sure that Trump knew it, Alex knew it and Mike Adams knew it.
So no $10 billion.
He put in charge of operation warp speed, someone who was head of research at a pharmaceutical company.
And his expertise was on brain machine interface.
Come on, Greg.
She says the hunter.
Monsef Slaoui was, and I pointed this out before, electroceuticals.
He and Fauci and Francis Collins and all of these pharmaceutical crooks were going everywhere telling everybody the future is electroceuticals.
The future is electroceuticals.
There's going to be treatment of everything with electroceuticals.
And when he got finished milking his fortune out of Operation Warp Speed,
Monsef Slaoui went back to the pharmaceutical companies as head of electroceuticals.
He was soon kicked out for sexual harassment allegations.
So Hunter says, I just can't believe that he would say, sure, let's kill millions of
people.
I just have a hard time believing that.
Fitz says, go back then.
You're saying that he's incompetent because if I knew what I knew, you know, don't tell
me that I knew more than Trump.
I just don't buy that.
Hunter, do you think that he, of the dealed this and he had some
trade-off and the trade-off was, well, you can get your check, but some of you are going to die.
Fitz said, you know something? I have no idea what was going on and I don't care because you
had the president roll out something that in March, 2020, I was sure was going to harm and
kill millions of people,
and he either had two reasons for doing it.
Either he's incompetent or he's breaking the law.
Which one do you want?
I don't know. I wasn't there, so I can't say what his motivations were.
But I know what I knew, and I know what I hold him responsible to know,
and I know what he did.
He's called himself the father of vaccine.
He produced the pandemic.
Fauci directed it.
It's a movie.
It's a movie.
The script was written by DARPA and the CIA, and they rehearsed it for two decades.
And then they put a guy in and built him up as some, um,
uh,
opponent to globalism so that everybody would lay down. And you still got people like Greg Hunter laying down for this guy and
apologizing for him and Alex and other people like that.
So,
um,
he then goes on to try to make a distinction between Biden and Trump by
claiming that at least Trump would not have mandated the shots.
This is the official Republican platform.
This is where Ben Shapiro hung out for a year while people were being killed and crippled.
That's not anti-vaccine.
It's not even anti-COVID-19 injection position.
That's the GOP establishment position,
that we're not going to take on the pharmaceutical companies.
Catherine Austin Fitz explains that it doesn't matter who the president is.
Changing the president doesn't matter.
I said that. I said, if we're going to be ruled by executive orders,
but it's going to be coming from,
if the president's going to subordinate himself to bureaucrats,
and the bureaucrats are going to make the rules,
and public health officials are going to make the rules,
what difference does it make who the governor is or who the president is?
We've got the public health officials are dictating things to us,
and they still have, after 1,020 days, they still have their presumed legal authority to do that in place.
She said, or actually, Brian says, Biden said exactly the same thing a year ago, Christmastime 2021.
Doesn't make any difference between Trump and Biden. He said a full year after the implementation of the Trump shots,
that this was the only thing that he and president Trump agreed on.
She went on to say the battle is at the local level.
I agree with her on that as well.
Now,
Brian disagrees.
She,
she looks more at the state legislators and governors.
He looks more at the sheriffs. and I agree with that as well.
I think the closest, the offices that are closest to you,
where the rubber meets the road, are going to be your local elections,
your community elections.
And then the next most important ones are going to be at the state level.
And a distant third is a federal level.
The president Congress, uh, is a distant third.
And this is why I say, you know, he goes on to talk about DeSantis in Florida.
Uh, Brian believes is, uh, you know, it's a head fake, pretty much the stuff that he's doing because it's limited and what he's doing, and this is why I say, you
know, and again, if there's any lawyers out there who want to explain this to me,
um, I understand why, if you're going to convene a grand jury to go statewide
as a listener explained to me, you know, well, typically the grand juries
are on a County by County basis.
So he wants to do a grand jury investigation and wants to do it statewide.
So he's got to go to the Supreme court to do that.
My question is, why would you convene a grand jury?
Why would you go that direction?
Because you have every state Florida does too, has a state bureau of investigation.
They can do the investigation.
You've got district attorneys and you've got a state attorney general.
They do and can do and they also do investigations themselves.
So why do you have to have a grand jury and go to the Supreme court to get permission for this?
He's got so many state law enforcement and investigation agencies under him.
Why does he have to get permission for anything?
You know,
we had blue bell and they had listeria that got into their ice cream
manufacturing thing.
And they had some people who died from that infection and they got a big fine.
They were shut down for quite a. And they got a big fine. They were shut down for quite a while.
They got a big fine.
There's either threats or convictions for the CEO.
I don't recall exactly the details.
But, I mean, there were some criminal charges.
I don't know if they convicted him or not.
I know that he was charged for criminal stuff.
Why is it that you can't do that with vaccines? I mean, we have officials at the local level
who look at the purity of food.
We have officials at the state level.
We have officials at the federal level,
for which there's no authority,
but we have for the FDA at all.
But we have officials at state and the federal and the local level that look
at food adulteration.
They also look at fraud.
They also look at premeditated murder.
They also look at theft.
Why can't this be investigated without the permission of a Florida Supreme
Court?
You didn't have to convene and get permission to come after Blue Bell ice cream when they had their outbreak.
That was negligence.
It wasn't criminal intent.
This is premeditated criminal intent by elected officials
in collusion with these corporations and the bureaucrats
who are supposed to be the watchdogs.
That's why they're playing these games because they are all in collusion with
this.
These people have got skin in the game.
They're criminals as well.
As Brian says,
they've done nothing to stop the bioweapons from being injected into people in their state, including children.
Hear from their own mouths how they are lying about the safety of childhood vaccines, saying that they have no side effects or only one in a million.
When in fact, there's 553,000 records of injuries and deaths from all non-COVID vaccines and VAERS, which is only about 1% of the actual numbers.
So that's the reality of this.
And he, he does, um, give a shout out to Matt Trawella, uh, his book, uh, county, uh, well,
his report county before country, but his book that I've interviewed him about multiple
times is, um, the doctrine of the lesser magistrate.
So, uh, we're going to take a quick break
and get something to drink,
and we'll be right back.
Stay with us. piano plays softly © transcript Emily Beynon You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, Moderna has fired back at Pfizer.
They have a lawsuit between the two of them over patents.
I think it's time to grab some popcorn and hope for the best.
It's like watching a war between Iran and Iraq.
Moderna said Pfizer and BioNTech copied its innovations and called their argument that
its patented technology was pioneered by other scientists.
They call that an attempt to distract from the issues.
Moderna sued Pfizer in August, accusing, and of course, BioNTech.
BioNTech is a German company.
Pfizer's, I don't know, kind of German, but more based in America.
So sued those two companies, accused them of infringing on three patents.
And of course, you know, I've always thought from the very beginning of this,
that the plan of Fauci and the FDA and the bureaucracy and Trump was to put Moderna
in first place. You know, Moderna, uh, before they were called Moderna,
they pronounced the name of the company mode R N a they'd existed for 10 years
before this scam.
And they had made a lot of money with a lot of fairy stories on wall street
talking about how they had an M RNA cure for this and an M RNA cure for that.
It never developed for 10 years.
They were a pump and dump stock fraud that never produced anything.
But Monsef Slaoui, when he had worked at, I forget, was it Merck or GlaxoSmithKline?
I think it was GSK that he was at.
But when he was there, he had partnered with Fauci on Pandemrix for the 2009 H1N1 fear.
And,
uh,
that was the vaccine that injured so many people in Scandinavia kids.
Uh,
they wound up with severe cases of narcolepsy,
catalepsy,
where you just freeze,
uh,
like,
uh,
the Edgar Allen Poe story,
you know,
premature burial,
things like that.
Um,
kids now in their late twenties committing suicide because it's destroyed their lives. Uh, you know, premature burial, things like that. Um, kids now in their late twenties committing suicide because
it's destroyed their lives.
Uh, so the Scandinavian officials caught that after about a year.
Uh, but that was their previous partnership.
And I've always believed that this was a partnership because he brought in
Monsef Slaoui who had left again.
I think it was GSK that he worked with.
He had left them.
He was head of the vaccine program there.
He left them, and he was like on the board or something of Moderna,
but he got a high-level position at Moderna.
And so, you know, this was all about the mRNA.
Pfizer had never done anything with mRNA.
So I think all this stuff was prepared in advance,
conspired in advance,
but Pfizer had the manufacturing capability.
So I think there was probably some corporate espionage.
And this is just my opinion.
I have nothing to back this up with
except very strong hunches.
And so I'm not surprised to see this lawsuit here.
I was surprised to see Pfizer take the lead because you remember when Trump
staged that whole thing and he had a televised meeting with all these
pharmaceutical executives.
What do you have and how long is it going to take you to do a vaccine?
Well, Mr.
President, we can do a vaccine in two years.
Well, that's not good enough.
What next person down then?
And he had them all arranged so that each successive pharmakia guy, uh, had could go
faster and faster.
And the last one that he talks to, I mean, he had it all planned out.
He and Fauci, the last one that he talks to, I mean, he had it all planned out. He and Fauci. The last one that he talks to is Moderna.
Well, Mr.
President, we've already got it and we just, we can start manufacturing
tomorrow if you want to give us a lot of money.
Oh, done.
Let's do it.
What a phony show that was.
Moderna has asked for an undisclosed amount of money damages from Pfizer
for vaccines sold since March.
Pfizer's vaccine made them over $26 billion.
And just the first nine months of this year, not talking about last year, made even more last year.
Moderna sold $13.5 billion over the same period.
So in nine months, one of them makes 26 billion and the other makes 13 billion.
Not enough.
There is no honor among thieves, especially among murderers.
The great men of the earth, the pharmakia, are not repenting of their murders or of their thefts.
They're suing each other.
So, uh, by the way, if you look at this right aid, the drugstore, uh, was making a lot of
money and they're losing a lot of money now because they're losing the COVID shots.
They were actually having some problems, right? Aid lost a $36 million.
And, uh, now that the vaccines are going away, even with the vaccines,
they lost $36 million.
Now the vaccines have gone away.
They're losing $67 million.
The vaccines were making $30 million just for the drug companies.
This is one of the reasons why I said, you know, we're in a grocery store and it's not
a grocery store we typically go to.
And it was so annoying.
We were there for about a half hour.
We must've heard five or six at least five, maybe six commercials for the COVID vaccine.
No music, no other commercials for anything else.
Just get your COVID shot.
It's available now, blah, blah, blah.
And it's like, they've got to be making a fortune off this.
Well, Rite Aid, which is struggling with massive losses,
made $30 million, and that was just in one quarter.
One quarter.
So they,
you know, without the vaccines,
they've lost an additional $31 million in one quarter.
Uh,
so experts are telling hospitals now to stop screening patients who are coming
into the hospital,
you know,
for a broken arm.
Well, you get a COVID test, right?
That's become standard operating procedure.
And the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America is saying,
you need to not give COVID tests to people who don't have any respiratory symptoms.
They said the small benefits that come from asymptomatic testing at this stage in the
pandemic are overridden by potential harms from delays in procedures, delays in patient
transfers, and strains on laboratory capacity and personnel.
In other words, your procedures are harming people.
I had a listener who works as EMS.
I've talked about this on air.
He said, I cannot believe this because they give,
because he delivers the patients that are in a state of emergency to the hospital.
And the first thing they would do, no matter what it was,
was take them back and run some COVID tests and make them wait for the results.
He said, I had a patient come in who's clearly having a major heart attack and they want
to do a COVID test on him first.
That's just criminal malpractice.
And they're being called out by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Stop testing them if they've got no symptoms because you're delaying critical treatment to that.
Well, why do they do that?
Money.
If they can get a COVID test, then even if the person is dying of a heart attack, if they can get a positive PCR test, they get a bonus of $13,000.
And then they get a bonus of 20% for everything they do to that person.
Those are rules that were put in by Trump and they're continuing.
And that's why they're continuing to do this.
And that's why they'd rather let the guy die from a heart attack because then, hey, if
they get a roll the dice, if I, uh, if it comes up
lucky numbers on the PCR test, I just won $13,000 winner, winner, chicken dinner. Well, the patient
died because you didn't give them appropriate care. You're too worried about, um, making money.
And that's what it's all about. That's what it's all about. Pandemic response is now getting a permanent new home at the White House. This is coming from Stat News. This is a trade
publication, which by the way, I can't believe that the story never really caught on. It was,
it was a story by Stat News and it was also picked up by some small investigative reporters in the UK.
And then it was picked up by the Indian news.
And I talked about it, but I never saw anybody else talk about it.
And that is that Argentina and Brazil and a third country in Latin America, South America, that remained anonymous because they did reach an agreement
with Pfizer.
But at that point in time, Argentina and Brazil had not reached an agreement.
They went public and said, Pfizer tried to blackmail us.
So we're not going to give you the vaccine unless you give us all kinds of immunity against
manufacturing issues.
I mean, not just the design of this vaccine, which hasn't been tested because it's an emergency,
but if you don't give us legal immunity and if you don't give us,
if you don't hold us harmless and if you don't give us indemnification
backed up by assets in foreign countries, even like some of their
ambassadorial, their embassy property and things like that.
If you don't back it up with that, we're not going to give you the vaccine.
You don't get the vaccine.
Nobody's going to come in or go out of your country.
Pfizer blackmailed them over this global agenda, this globalist conspiracy.
And so, you know, stat news pointed it out.
I mean, it's a trade publication.
And then we had other companies, countries that came out and said the same thing as well,
but it really hasn't been picked up by anybody.
I guess I should go back and write, even though it's old news, I should go back and write
an article about it.
I've got to get things scheduled so I can start writing articles again.
Anyway.
So, um, who needs a pandemic treaty from the world health organization?
If you're going to set up a permanent new home of pandemic response in the white house,
this is why I'm saying it's not going away.
We're a thousand 20 days into Trump's emergency executive order.
Biden has used it for all kinds of things. He tried to use it as the basis for student loan forgiveness before the election.
It's just a gift that keeps on giving these Trump precedents,
just like the Trump precedent of doing gun control by executive order.
So now Congress aims to give the pandemic response, a permanent home at the white house, a brand new white house office of pandemic preparedness and response policy
that would have a director appointed by the president.
And they're going to start out with 25 staff members.
This is,
um,
a provision that was,
um,
stuck into the,
um, you know,
this $1.7 trillion bill that got passed on Friday.
And it was stuck in there by Patty Murray and who is a Democrat from
Washington and by Richard Burr,
the crooked Republican who got caught playing with the advanced information,
you know,
his wife buying stocks and everything is getting ready to lock stuff down, who is not running for reelection.
You know, this is, he did not run for reelection.
So he's, he's putting this into that mega bill, $1.7 trillion bill to set up a
pandemic response team at the white house, Richard Burr, Republican.
Nasal vaccines are here now.
This is coming from the Atlantic.
Uh, so I guess, you know, we got, uh, some of the sheep are scared of needles.
So let's just do it by squirting it into people's noses.
But what is alarming about this is that if this is going to be airborne, do you remember operationay, military operation off the coast of California,
1950? It was exposed in 1971, congressional hearings into it. They decided that they would do
a test of bioweapons against Americans. And of course, this has been done many times.
They've done it in the subways of New York City.
Oh, we released a harmless pathogen
or harmless bacteria or something.
Well, in the case of Operation Sea Spray,
they had 11 people who were very sick
and hospitalized with it.
One of the things that blew the cover on it,
but it took 21 years for the information to come out.
You have these types of things, operation sea spray in 1950,
you had operation, um, Northwoods where they said, you know,
we want to go to war with Cuba. Let's, uh, let's create a false flag attack.
Let's fly planes into buildings. Um,
let's attack military installations and kill soldiers. And that's being pushed by the
chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Lyman Limitzer. JFK shut it down, just like he shut
down some of the other stuff and fired him. So then he goes to Europe and he runs Operation
Gladio, a false flag attack there. That included our friend Steve Pachinik.
You know, Kissinger got him involved.
And anyway, getting off on a tangent here.
But now nearly three years into the pandemic,
vaccines that are sprayed through the nose are popping up all over the map.
Nasal spray vaccine is now being both rolled out amid a massive wave of cases they said
and you know i'll just remind people you know it's they could do it'd be easy for them to do
nasal vaccines just like it's easy for them remember as they were giving and still giving
people these pcr tests and running the big swab way up your nose
and everything.
Then they decided they would do it a little bit shorter and everything to ameliorate the
resistance to it.
But before they shortened up the swab, even you had all these elites going to the con
film festival and they said, it was disgusting.
I had to spit into this thing to get a PCR test.
And of course you could, with a PCR test, you could test spittle.
You don't have to just ram something up somebody's nose.
Why were they doing it?
Why were they doing it when they could just have people spit and have the test?
And I'm telling you, it's because these people are sadistic.
They like to rub your nose in it, literally.
It is just amazing.
So let's talk about the new mRNA vaccines.
It's not going to be limited to COVID.
Not at all.
Robert Malone says, I'm father of the mRNA vaccines.
Well, good for you.
They're going to be applied all over the place. BioNTech has now dosed their first patient with a herpes vaccine that is mRNA.
And do they really need to have more than one patient to get this approved?
I'm sure they don't.
They only need to have one patient, right?
We don't need to run any tests.
We don't need to take 10 or 12 years to do that anymore, right?
As Fauci said, we're just going to do it from the inside with disruption and chaos,
and we'll do it iteratively.
Well, here we are.
University of Pennsylvania and BioNTech established in 2018 a research collaboration
aimed at developing novel mRNA vaccine candidates for the prevention
and treatment of various infectious diseases.
So they're advancing two mRNA vaccine candidates now for malaria and tuberculosis.
They're already testing.
And I'm sure, you know, after giving it to one patient, they'll wait a month or two and say, we're done.
No more tests need to be done.
Right.
But you're going to start seeing MRNA vaccines popping up for everything.
Herpes malaria, tuberculosis already.
And we'll have to see what else they do, but here's what really concerns me.
What is happening in China?
China is not a bellwether.
China is a beta test.
The globalists get them to roll this stuff out and see how everybody reacts to it.
And they use them for propaganda.
And so you have, um, Reuters and this is picked up by mainstream media.
It's picked up by drudge a whole bunch over the weekend of articles from drudge
about how, uh, this is a pandemic part due, right?
Uh, the second coming of the pandemic, the ICU is full medical staff on the
front line of China's COVID fight says the hospitals are overwhelmed.
Don't believe this for a second.
This is the same, the same game, the same movie that we've been through before.
And, of course, there's a lot of people that you can fool all the time.
You can fool some of the people all the time,
and those people will be fooled.
But they're running that whole thing again now.
And they're going from praising China for the courage to do a lockdown.
Remember that a couple of weeks ago?
Mainstream media, well, you know, NPR,
you got to say that China did a great job of controlling this.
If only we could have had the backbone
to seal people into their homes and not give them any food.
Boy, we could have stopped this thing that now is,
everybody admits, not a big deal, right?
If it even exists.
So it is a game of Simon Says.
Simon is a globalist, and of course, you know, the first people to do it, to model it, to do the beta tests, are going to be the Chinese.
Following what their globalist masters are telling them.
So this is the narrative coming now from Reuters and mainstream news.
We've got a lot of news reports about what's going on in China.
Be afraid.
This is going to be something that's going to go worldwide again.
Patients are arriving at this hospital in ever-increasing numbers.
Almost all are elderly.
Many are very unwell with COVID and pneumonia symptoms, scrambling to cope after China's abrupt U-turn on its previously strict COVID policies.
So will they use this to say, see, lockdown worked.
It worked for China.
And then when Xi relented, you know, he's such a softy.
He's got a soft heart.
He's so full of compassion.
And when he saw that his people were about to overthrow him,
he decided that he would back off of this.
Oh, no.
Well, they say that lockdown worked.
Therefore, we must all live in these little villages
where everything is within 15 minutes and you don't go to the other side?
I mean, we look at the climate lockdown being already put in place in places like Oxford and
Canterbury and other cities in the UK. We're not allowed to go into the other part of the city,
but just a couple of times, and that's all done in the name of climate. Are they going to say, well, look at China, you know, they had this thing under
control, but then when they pull down the lockdown, now it's exploding.
And that's exactly what they're saying.
That lockdown kept us at bay.
So we're going to need to be locked down in our little 15 minute villages where
everything's within a 15 minute walk because they don't want you driving anywhere.
Uh, it's always been the same profile, said one person.
Most of the patients have not been vaccinated.
I can't believe that they are going down and telling us every single one of the
lies that's been debunked for the last thousand plus days.
They're going back and repeating all these things and expecting people to buy this.
The Drudge Report.
What a sellout Matt has become.
Just unbelievable.
The patients and their relatives visit because local hospitals are overwhelmed,
she said, because they wish to buy Paxlovid, the Pfizer-made COVID treatment.
There's a little commercial here from Reuters, right?
Which many places are running low on.
They want the medicine as a replacement of the vaccine,
but the medicine doesn't replace the vaccine.
You got to get them both.
It's a matched set for fools.
China has narrowed its definition for classifying deaths as COVID-related,
counting only those involving COVID-caused pneumonia or respiratory failure,
raising eyebrows among world health experts.
Because, you know, the world health experts want us to include people who died crashing their
motorcycle.
If they'd had a PCR test in the last month that tested positive.
So we should be including the people who are dying from motorcycle crashes,
say the world health experts.
Can't believe we're having this discussion again.
I can't believe they're putting,
they have the temerity to put this crap out.
China has narrowed it.
That is China's fault.
And this is what they say.
This is not medicine.
It's politics.
You should be counting people who don't have respiratory illness as a COVID
death.
That's medicine.
But if you don't count people who don't have any respiratory illness and you've told everybody that COVID is a respiratory
illness, oh, you should, it's medicine to count them. That's not politics.
They've just, it's projection, it's inversion of the truth.
It's amazing. Harrowing videos show
lines of coffins and body bag queues.
This is being put out by The Sun, a tabloid in the UK.
Amid China's COVID mega tsunami, as 5,000 people die a day.
Where did they get that number?
They made it up.
They made it up.
There's no evidence for that.
They have no data for that, but it makes it into the headline.
They admit in the article that they don't know how many people are dying.
And let me just say this.
We were sold these lies all this time.
We were told that,
Hey,
look,
they're burying people in central park.
I'd like to know where that New York graveyard is.
Has anybody found that New York graveyard in central park where they were
burying all the people? What happened to that tent that Franklin Graham had? And they quietly packed their
tent and went away? What about that 2,500-bed Army Field Hospital that was not used a single time?
What about the Navy hospital ship that was parked there in New York city as
well? What about the Navy hospital ship in California as well? They just left. They didn't
have any patients for the hospital ships for the army field hospital for Franklin Graham's thing.
And he's silent about that. And I think he really got the shot. I think he really believed this stuff,
even though they didn't have any patients and New York city was supposed to be
ground zero and you're burying people in central park.
Seriously.
I think Franklin got it,
got the shot because he wound up a few months later getting pericarditis.
So COVID mega tsunami, body bags being taken to crematoriums remember when these same trustworthy
media outlets were telling us that the russians had portable crematoriums that they were taking
into ukraine because they didn't want people to know how many soldiers are dying and then that
was debunked they showed that that was a picture how many soldiers are dying. And then that was debunked.
They showed that that was a picture from many years ago of something else completely.
So they said it is estimated that at least 5,000 people are dying a day.
They don't have any data to back this up at all,
but that becomes the headline for The Sun.
Put this up.
They say China's population has low levels of immunity because of the lockdown,
which stemmed in part from its botched attempt to produce an effective vaccine.
This is the propaganda narrative.
So the lockdowns worked, but the people are vulnerable because they didn't get a good vaccine.
You know, the ones made by our sponsors, Pfizer and the rest of them,
you know, Pfizer and Moderna.
Those are the ones that you need to have.
Yeah, those, those.
The Sun, sponsored by Pfizer.
Crematoriums are reportedly already working 24 hours to cope with the number of dead
soaring as huge queues of hearses line the streets.
Footage claiming to be from a crematorium in the city of Tianjin
shows a long line of red coffins.
And the sun adds this important verifying detail, a common color for them in the country.
So there we go. We know they're coffins because they're red.
They estimate that there's already 5,000 deaths a day in China in contrast to the seven
officially admitted to by the government. So the government says we've got seven people
who died from COVID and we're going to stop this zero COVID stuff.
So then you have the Western media say, oh no, they don't have seven people die.
They got 5,000 people a day die.
This is a country of 1.4 billion people.
Now, how many people do you think die in the United States on a daily basis?
A country of about one-fifth the population of China.
How many Americans die every day in America?
I'm not a mathematician, but I'm going to say at least seven.
Seven people?
Yeah, I'm going to say at least seven.
Well, if you said 7,500, you'd be correct.
Darn, I was so close.
You got the one digit right.
But there's three more there.
Yeah.
7,500 people die in America on a daily basis back in 2018, before the shots.
It's probably more than that now.
China has got five times the population.
And they're saying, well, we think there's 5,000 people a day dying in China.
Be afraid.
Be very afraid.
It's absolutely insane.
Let me tell you what I think is behind this, could be behind this.
They may actually be burying a lot of people that they found dying all these months that they had people barricaded and locked in their homes.
They couldn't even get out to get food or medical care.
How many people you think died in their homes, sealed into their homes from the outside?
They come out and drill a hole into the concrete and put a metal rod there to keep you from
opening the door.
How many people you think died being locked down without medical care or food?
And now that they're opening up, maybe they're going around and finding a lot of dead bodies,
taking them to the crematorium.
Perhaps.
I don't know.
Sergey Drobin, thank you very much for the tip.
He said, quote, it's the most controversial conversation I've had with anyone in the last
almost three years because people can't fathom that the government has lied to them that badly.
Even the so-called conspiracy guys don't want to possibly admit this whole thing isn't real
and that the only real bioweapon is in the shots. Well, that's true because, yeah, hey, it's our
guys. I mean, you don't want to get to the spot where you don't trust anybody
in government because that's a lonely place to be. We don't want to feel like we're all alone
with all this stuff. And you know, a lot of people don't have, uh, any faith in something
that is greater than them. So president Xi is urging steps to protect lives as China battles
the COVID wave. Oh yes. you should have listened to Xi.
If only you'd listened to Xi.
But you had to complain.
And then he let everybody out.
And now everybody is dying.
Millions infected per day.
This is France 24.
Who cares if it's not a fatal infection?
I mean, it's like Omicron.
Oh, yeah.
Look at all the cases we've got.
Is anybody?
No, nobody's like Omicron. Oh, yeah, look at all the cases we've got. Is anybody, no, nobody's dying, but, you know, hey, be afraid
because we've got people supposedly being infected with a non-fatal thing.
We've got people getting a cold.
Let's lock the world down.
The main funeral service center in the southern metropolis of Guangzhou
postponed all ceremonies until January the 10th to focus on cremations
due to the large workload.
Again, this could be people who died during lockdown,
starved to death, denied medical treatment.
That could be what happened in Guangzhou.
But this is how it's being spun by the American media.
Bloomberg, China's COVID tsunami
could spark a dangerous new variant that infects the world.
It'll be a psychological variant.
I don't know.
I mean, haven't most people been inoculated against this propaganda at this point in time?
They're running all of the same lies again,
and so they're going to have to come up with some variant propaganda
and lies to scare people.
And, of course, you want to start in China.
Bloomberg.
The tsunami of COVID-19 that is taking hold across China
is spurring concern that a dangerous new virus variant
could emerge for the first time in more than a year
just as genetic sequencing to catch such a threat is dwindling.
We let our guard down, and now we're all going to die.
Take the vaccine.
The Associated Propagandist at AP,
the WHO is very concerned about reports of severe COVID in China.
The AP says, the head of the World Health Organization said,
the agency is very concerned about the reports of severe coronavirus disease across China
after the country largely abandoned its zero COVID policy.
They want us to all have a zero COVID, zero cars, zero food, zero milk, zero meat, everything.
Yeah, this is a media frenzy.
And you notice how it's a propaganda echo campaign.
They're cutting and pasting from each other.
They're cutting and pasting from the WHO.
Los Angeles County, trying to put a mask mandate back in,
weren't able to do that.
But they're now extending the eviction moratorium.
And so it's going back and forth.
I think they need to get somebody in there like George Santos,
who knows what it's like to,
uh,
be a landlord who can't evict people who are not.
Oh,
that's right.
It was the other way around for George Santos.
He was the deadbeat tenant evicted twice.
And then he claimed he was a landlord.
This guy,
this guy,
anyway,
um,
it's another one of the Trump precedents that we're going to let these health officials, whether it's the CDC or whether it's local health officials, we're going to let them come in and shut down contracts that people have.
And it's a one-sided thing. There's nothing in here.
So this is Los Angeles County now following the city of LA saying, we're going
to now extend this to June. It would be the right thing to do, says the county supervisor.
So they're going to let the people who are property owners, they're not going to be paid
for another six months. But is there a moratorium on foreclosures? If you don't pay the bank what you owe on the property,
can they foreclose and take the property?
There is absolutely nothing about that from the perspective.
They talk about how it affects rent control and some of these other things,
but nothing about whether or not this is a massive land grab by the banks, which I think is what this really is.
So, again, is the city and the county of L.A., are they going to give a moratorium on property taxes?
No.
Uh-uh.
And what they're saying is this is not a forgiveness.
These people will have to pay this back.
But, of course, the renters who have lived there for free for two years or more,
actually it would be more than two years by that time,
the renters who have lived there for free will say,
well, I don't have that money, so long and thanks for all the fish and free rent.
They've taken this, the Apartment Owners Association of California
took this to court.
They won in court.
And then these local officials did the same thing
that you've seen a lot of the politicians in New York
after they lost with the Bruin decision.
They just came back and they used some different semantics, but they kept restrictions on where you could carry guns and everything.
You can't take them into sensitive places and all this kind of stuff.
So they will play that game.
They will come back and say, well, uh, we're not going to, um, um, get rid of this.
We're going to put some more prevarications in here so we can keep this policy
going, even though we lost in court.
That's what is happening.
Again, none of this stuff is ending.
But before we take a break,
I talked about the fact that there's already three new mRNA vaccines and or
treatments out there.
And, you know, it was, what was it, hepatitis,
and I forget what the other two, malaria, I think,
and tuberculosis.
Now you have nanotech being brought into the mix as well,
not just genetic modification, but nanotechnology.
Israelis are bringing miraculous cancer-killing tech to the marketplace.
This is a story from WND.
It's based on nanomachine breakthroughs of world-renowned scientist James Tour,
who works at Rice University in Houston, but he is bringing this to market using an
Israeli company.
They're going to take this to market.
So James Tour led a team that developed next-generation technology to target and to kill cancer cells
with virtually no side effects.
And if you believe that, I'll tell you a story about nuclear power that's going to be too
cheap to meter.
No side effects.
It's perfect.
It works perfectly.
Tour, a professor of chemistry, is using the nanomachines, the marvelous motorized organic
molecules created in a lab that won three chemists a Nobel Prize in 2016.
He's using that to target cancerous cells.
So here's how this supposedly works.
These nanomachines identify a diseased cell,
and they are equipped with a rotor and a stator.
They are activated by ultraviolet light
to drill through the cell membranes
at a speed of up to 3 million times per second.
The cancer cells then can be killed
either by injecting chemical agents from the nanobots
or by repeatedly piercing the cell
to blast open tumorous membranes
until the cell dies by necrosis.
I'm sure that there's absolutely nothing that could go wrong with that scheme.
These nanobots will be able to identify with 100% accuracy
the cells that they are to destroy.
And then they will inject poison only into those bad cells and or repeatedly drill them to death.
And you don't have to worry about them doing that to any healthy cells.
It's now closer to reality with the launch of an Israeli company called Nanorobotics.
Nanorobotics is one of 16 companies that are working in nanotech.
15 of the 16 are located in Israel.
Nano Robotics is the only one that is based, however, on TOR's nanomachine technology.
He said one of the three pioneers in the development of nanomachines were awarded the Nobel Prize
in 2016.
TOR was quoted in the New York Times story saying that the Nobel Prize
would help to convince people that the nanomachines are not
science fiction, but a gold mine. No, he didn't say
that. He says, no one is making money on these right now, but that'll come.
He predicted the first profitable use might be machines
that open up cell membranes in the body to deliver drugs.
He said,
it's going to be really quite extraordinary.
I'm not sure if he's talking about his technology or the amount of money that
he expects to make out of this.
Explain that his nano drills also can be programmed to target bacteria,
not just cancer cells,
but bacteria that have become resistant to drugs.
Sergey, thank you again for the tip.
He says, I think most of the alt media is about just as bad as the Associated Press
these days.
Every conservative I meet regurgitates the same thing about Trump was duped.
He had no, yeah, I'm so sick of that.
I'm so, I heard that for four years from Alex.
The CDC is God.
Trump is this and Trump this and Trump that.
Epic Times, Alex Jones, Crowder, all these guys.
That's how they make their money.
Then I'm told to cite my sources because if I disagree with the alt press,
I must be wrong.
Last three years worked out pretty well for these criminals.
Absolutely.
They had a lot of cover, didn't they?
Because, you know, if you want to, if you want to do this to people like Fauci said,
you got to do it from the inside.
Trump is the guy, our guy on the inside, our fifth column.
If you, if you want to stab somebody in the back, our fifth column.
If you want to stab somebody in the back, you've got to get behind them first.
And that's basically what he did.
We're going to take a quick break.
We'll be right back. This is The David Knight Show.
Let's talk about censorship.
We have Twitter files are now uh the ninth release of this uh these now are coming from matt taibi uh shows that the company suppressed debate
and information from doctors and experts if the politicians didn't agree with what they were
saying you only have one group of experts, one narrative that is allowed.
But here's the key thing.
We've known that for the longest time.
Here's the key thing.
Now I've got some documents showing that Alex Berenson was the New York Times reporter who
became a vaccine skeptic, a COVID vaccine skeptic.
I don't think he's a full vaccine skeptic.
I think it's just a COVID vaccine skeptic. I don't think he's a full vaccine skeptic. I think it's just a COVID vaccine.
But at the request of Biden,
Twitter removed Alex Berenson.
But, you know, it's a private company.
We were told this for the longest time.
They can get rid of anybody they want, right?
No, they're taking orders from Biden.
They're taking orders from the FBI.
They're taking orders from the CIA.
That was clear from the very beginning.
As I said, you know, when Infowars got purged in August 6, 2018, it was less than two months later, and the Democrats handed these social media companies a list of people that they
want banned,
people like Free Thought Project and other people who are not Trump supporters.
What do they have in common?
They all push back, and I've said this for years.
I've said this since that happened.
In October of 2018, there was a lot of Trump-supporting organizations,
but the vast majority of them were not Trump supporters,
and they were opposed to the surveillance state,
to the police state.
And these were lists that were handed over to them
by people in politics and government.
Therefore, you might logically conclude
that the people who were doing the purging
were the surveillance state, the police state,
the Democrats, those type of people,
handing over the list.
And yet, at that time, after that happened,
Trump had a garden party,
and he invited a lot of people, a lot of conservatives,
you know, to this garden party and he invited a lot of people, a lot of conservatives, you know, that, um, um,
to this garden party who had not been purged at that point in time later were,
and you had the heritage foundation had the Cato Institute,
the heritage foundation, the biggest conservative think tank Cato Institute,
the biggest libertarian think tank and the position that was taken by most of the alt-right press by the libertarians
by the conservatives hey twitter is and these companies are private companies they can do
whatever they want i said they're just a beard you know they're just a front organization it
gives plausible deniability the censorship is coming from the government. We've known this all along, but now we've got the documents.
So, um, uh, and again, this, this was the line of reason magazine forever.
Now they have now, because of these documents, finally reason has changed.
They finally realized that this is just a, you know, uh, a plausible deniability, uh,
thing that's happening anyway.
Um, David Zweig, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly,
he's a journalist.
He's now been given some of these documents by Elon Musk.
He laid bare how both Trump and Biden administrations
pressured Twitter executives to censor information
that was true, but
inconvenient, and this is why, you know, Trump never did anything to stop the
censorship because he was telling them who he wanted to censor right in the
aftermath of, um, uh, the, uh, censorship at info wars, Marco Rubio holding, uh, uh, a dog and pony show
with Twitter executives and YouTube and Facebook.
And he said, you're going to censor who we tell you to censor, right?
Not who China tells you to censor.
They want censorship.
They just want their political enemies and, uh, foreign countries that they are competing
with censored and,, and at their bidding.
So in the summer of 2021, Zweig writes, Biden said social media companies were killing people,
quote unquote, for allowing vaccine information. And just a few hours later, Berenson's account
was suspended. He was kicked off of the platform the following month. He ultimately sued and
settled with Twitter. Well, the Twitter files number nine shows that the CIA and other security
state involvement in censorship. Yeah. Who knew, who knew about the mockingbird press?
No, as I said, for the the longest time it's been the deep state
in the deputized state now we find that the cia was among a number of security state agencies
assassinating now the first amendment following the bizarre statement released by the fbi calling
twitter files reporting about the twitter files they called it misinformation that was being spread by conspiracy theorists.
Well, why wouldn't the FBI say that?
They coined the term conspiracy theorist to point people away from the JFK assassination.
They said this is misinformation spread by conspiracy theorists with the, quote,
sole purpose of discrediting the FBI.
The FBI doesn't need our help to discredit itself.
It's perfectly capable of doing it all by itself and has been doing it for the
last 60 plus years.
What they also do is run shows like the FBI, Ephraim Zimbalist Jr.
Remember that?
That was all produced by J. Edgar Hoover.
It was just a fantasy being fed to public about what J. Edgar Hoover,
this blackmailing Sam Britton type of guy.
I mean, J. Edgar Hoover, or I should say Sam Britton and Rachel Levine have nothing
over Jager Hoover, but he had a lot over everybody else.
He had blackmail files on everybody as, um, presidents publicly, uh, stated Nixon Truman.
Anyway.
Um, so Matt Taibbi comes back and he says,
oh, well, if they're going to take that tack,
that anybody that is putting out these Twitter files
from these documents, these emails,
between the FBI and Twitter,
showing how they are demanding and conspiring
to censor people in violation of the First Amendment,
you know, free speech and the free press, the FBI.
Well, if they're going to take that tack and just call it misinformation
spread by conspiracy theorists, he goes, well, why stop with just one agency?
Taibbi writes that the FBI was the primary link between the intelligence community
and Twitter, the spies, the CIA.
You know, when I say CIA, I mean what a lot of people refer to as IC or the intelligence community.
Describing the Bureau, the FBI, as a doorman for other agencies to connect with Twitter.
The files show the FBI acting as a doorman to a vast program of social media surveillance and censorship,
writes Taibbi.
It encompasses agencies across the federal government from the State Department to the
Pentagon to the CIA.
Understand what's going on.
The FBI can come in and say, we're doing an investigation and we want to spy on this
person or that person.
They're unfortunately allowed to do that because their focus is on domestic stuff.
Because of the church committee hearings, the CIA, the NSA, these intelligence community agencies
are not supposed to be involved in domestic issues. They're supposed to be foreign only.
So that's why they use the FBI. The CIA wants information on you or they want to censor you.
So they go to the FBI because the FBI gives them cover.
Oh yeah, we're all about domestic stuff.
Then the FBI goes to Twitter and says, we want you to do this, which was sent to them by the CIA.
And then everybody says, Cato Institute, Heritage Foundation, these conservative alt-media people say,
well, Twitter is just private, so they can do whatever they want.
And in reality, if you follow this dirty chain of laundry, it goes back to the CIA.
It's the CIA that was censoring people.
Twitter has so much contact with so many agencies that executives lost track, writes Taibbi.
Is today the DOD and tomorrow the FBI?
Is it the weekly call or is it the monthly meeting?
It was dizzying.
A chief end result was that thousands of official reports flowed to Twitter from all over, uh, from the
FBI, from the CIA, the CIA is referred to in these communications as the OGA.
Came up with an alias for their name, even the OGA, which stands
for other government agency.
This is so funny.
I mean, you know, the, you have the Frank church committee hearings.
And when they talked about the NSA, even, uh, when I met one of the guys that I worked
with, uh, my first job with Texas instruments, he had worked for the national security agency,
the NSA.
And I didn't know who it was at the time.
That was 1980.
And he joked,
he goes,
well,
we say it stands for no such agency because the government doesn't even
acknowledge that it exists.
And so now instead of NSA,
no such agency,
you got the CIA,
which is OGA, other government agency.
These people, they're so predictable, aren't they?
So he said the FBI and the OGA were involved not only with Twitter, but also with, quote,
virtually every major tech firm, including Facebook, Microsoft, Verizon, Reddit,
even Pinterest and others, as well as industry players.
And, of course, you know, we had the massive purge August the 6th, 2018.
It kicked off everywhere.
Kicked off of LinkedIn.
I mean, it just depersoned everywhere, pretty much.
The only place it didn't kick me off, surprisingly, was Twitter, but they put a heavy shadow ban on me.
I almost wish they'd kicked me off. It would have been simpler. I wouldn't have wasted my time. So much time that
I wasted on Twitter. Uh, but it was, uh, it was God's providence. That was my only, uh, outlet to
the public to even tell people that I'd been fired and why I'd been fired was through Twitter. Um,
so, you know, there was that God always has another plan. Uh, so, you know, there was that.
God always has another plan.
So, you know, when we look at what is happening, this is stuff that was all predicted, right,
by Frank Church when he ran, when he investigated the CIA.
And, of course, at the same time, nobody talks about what was happening with the Pike committee
hearings in the House.
They investigated the NSA. So nobody even wants to talk about that because, again, committee hearings in the House. They investigated the NSA.
So nobody even wants to talk about that because, again, that was in the 1970s.
Even a decade later, there was still no such agency.
And when the NSA head went in to be interviewed by Congress,
Pike said, I'd like to see your charter.
I'm not showing you my charter.
We're created by executive order by the president. I'm not showing you my charter. We're created by executive order by the president.
I'm not showing you the charter.
You're nothing but a congressman.
Here's what Frank Church had to say.
The United States government has perfected a technological capability
that enables us to monitor the messages that go through the air.
These messages are between ships at sea.
They could be between military units in the field.
We have a very extensive capability of intercepting messages
wherever they may be in the airwaves.
Now, that is necessary and important to the United States intercepting messages wherever they may be in the airwaves.
Now that is necessary and important to the United States as we look abroad at enemies or potential enemies.
We must know.
At the same time, that capability at any time
could be turned around on the American people.
And no American would have any privacy left such as the capability to monitor everything,
telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter.
There would be no place to hide if this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever
took charge in this country.
The technological capacity that
the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose
total tyranny and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful
effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it
was done, is within the reach of the government to know.
Such is the capability of this technology.
Now, why is this investigation important?
I'll tell you why.
Because I don't want to see this country ever go across the bridge.
I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America.
And we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology
operate within the law and under proper supervision
so that we never cross over that abyss.
That's the abyss.
And of course he did cross over the abyss.
We did cross the rubicon and we did it with donald trump protecting us continued with biden and of course this is
something that happened long before trump and he did nothing to stop any of it even though he knew
and his administration was using this power the republicans don't want to get rid of it because
they want the power when they get in charge
to do this type of thing.
It is a system of total tyranny.
And that was the focus of the church committee hearings.
What came out of those hearings was FISA,
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,
which said that you're going to surveil people
in other countries, as you just heard him say here, you know, for national security and that type of thing.
Uh, we need to know what other nations are planning and, uh, you know, uh, enemies, uh,
but, uh, uh, we don't want them looking at Americans.
And so under Pfizer, uh, under, uh, Pfizer, Pfizer and Pfizer, yeah, they kind of go together, don't they?
Under Pfizer, you had a court that was set up, a secret court.
Now that secret court is turned into a star chamber where you can go in and you can get a search warrant for Mr. and Mrs. Verizon,
and you can listen to everybody if you wish in whatever way you want.
One of the ways that they were able to turn this, you know, the one thing that everybody remembers from the church committee hearings, right?
It's not really FISA.
FISA didn't become a thing until it was weaponized against Trump.
Yes, he was complicit in all of this.
He laid down, he allowed this to happen.
He even used it himself, but that doesn't mean that they won't use it against him
It is, after all, a game of thrones
And if you're going to allow these things to happen
As I've said for the longest time
If you step back and you allow these types of structures
To be put in place
And if you don't oppose them
They will be used against you
It will be used against the politicians first because they were the biggest enemies.
And so it'll be used in kind of a Game of Thrones situation.
But one of the things that they did was to change the public perception.
Nobody realized what the church committee hearing was really about.
Everybody thought it was about assassination attempts by the CIA,
giving exploding cigars to Fidel Castro, heart attack guns.
Remember that?
That's the clip that everybody's got.
That was what seized the public imagination.
And I want you to think about that because that's the key.
That's why I'm so critical of other people in alternative media
who add sensational details to the truth, to critical truth.
Because that is the tactic that has been used time and again by other government agencies or the CIA and all the rest of them.
They got everybody focused on what the reason that you had the church committee hearings and the reason you had the Pike committee hearings was because from their inception,
the CIA and the NSA were illegally spying on Americans, but they turned it.
They added sensational details to it.
Even if they were true, they added sensational details to it.
And it became all about CIA assassinations and other things like that. Completely distracting everybody from the core truth of our government spying upon us.
That's why Frank Church did it.
And the reason that they went into the heart attack gun and the rest of this stuff was to add sensational details to the truth to distract you from the truth, if not discrediting the truth.
That has always been the tactic.
That has always been the tactic of the CIA and others.
And that's why when you see it being done by alternative media,
I won't mention his name again,
but when you see it being done by them,
you're the victim of an intelligence community tactic.
Whether it's being put out by Alex or whether it's being put out by Steve Pachinik
or whether it is something about an election that they say they can fix.
Always in sensational details to distract you from the real plot.
Well, that's it for today's
broadcast. Thank you for joining us.
The Common Man The common man.
Man.
Common core. And control us.
Communist future.
Uncomfortable.
Unsophisticated.
Has worth and dignity.
It's what they want to take away.
Deception. It's what they want to take away.
Deception.
Everything about us.
Turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at the David Knight show.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you.