The David Knight Show - 28Dec22 The Truth about Nuclear War

Episode Date: December 28, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Supreme Court moves to stay Title 42 but it's not about protecting US BORDER, it's about protecting pandemic ORDERS 2:06Peter Schiff is even more bullish on gold now but he's missing the real issue by treating gold as a speculative investment (which is how he characterizes bitcoin) 12:15 Eric Peters - the EV Grinch that stole Christmas (cold weather and charging)20:31 Ford has mentioned not covering the warranty on vehicle batteries that use superchargers too much (yes, they're tracking how many times you use them)28:49 2023 Predictions: Nostradamus, Revelation, BigTech 32:03 New York Post says Nostradamus got it right on extinction because he agrees with predictions (false) from Climate Cassandras, as well cryptocurrency and Buckingham Palace predictions (seriously)38:58 Amazon testing tech that will ID you and watch your every move in stores, charging you for what you take without a checkout43:21 Why I'm certain all Big Box retailers will buy into an in-store mass surveillance system50:55 The mayor of Knoxville, Tennessee, attended a Christmas Drag show marketed for all ages. State officials say nothing can be done. I disagree 56:18 Whining Lindsey Graham pushed confiscation of frozen Russian assets into the funding bill and he's pushing assassination of Putin again, validating Russian perspective that NATO is out to "tear Russia apart". 1:09:37 Another Putin opponent has been defenestrated1:19:20 WATCH: Propaganda film show Putin as Santa Claus defending boy from LGBT groomers 1:26:54 The CIA is directly involved in sabotage attacks inside Russian territory, report says — and it looks just like NATO's Operation Gladio 1:30:17 Obama green lighted the NATO operation in 2014 as his administration orchestrated the Ukrainian coup1:37:14 1979 Congressional report on the effects of a nuclear attack and the narrative story imagining life during and after the attack in Charlottesville, VA1:42:04 A true story of individual courage and faith that brought peace between combatants shows the power of small acts of courage to change the world. 1:51:24 WEF cancels Twitter just before January's Davos meeting. However, they've moved in a big way toward Chinese social media controlled by CCP2:00:34The Deputized State and the Chain of Deniability 2:09:00 The (George) Santos Clause — Why no one can stop the liar & fraud from becoming a Congressman (along with other less obvious liars and frauds). But then what? Will Republicans protect him from expulsion? What does this tell us about Trump's ability to run, even if convicted and in jail?2:22:23 FDA makes another push to regulate vitamin supplements as major corporations go on a buying spree of supplement companies2:38:37 Merck’s anti-viral drug doesn’t reduce hospitalization or death rate — it's key feature is that it's expensive. It's Fauci's Remdesivir precedent repeated again2:48:54 Boston is looking into putting in mask mandates as the students come back from their Christmas holiday. Don't worry, it's JUST FOR 2 WEEKS. Didn't we hear that somewhere before?2:56:35Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 28th of December. Year of Our Lord 2022. Day 1021 of the emergency. And they're going to protect that emergency by all means. That's what's going on with Title 42 right now. We'll talk about that.

We'll also talk about the Santos Clause. George Santos came out. This is a guy who just keeps giving, even after Christmas, with gifts, admitting a lot of his lies, but very interesting if you look at what can be done about it. And it has implications for a lot of things, including Trump running for president. We'll also talk about war, assassinations, nuclear war scenarios. Stay with us. We'll be right back. Well, as I just said, we have the Supreme Court has made a move to stay the suspension of Title 42.

This is something that has caused a great deal of consternation, even with Democrats, concerned that the massive number of people who are amassed at the border coming across are going to overwhelm them in terms of services. Cities will be overwhelmed. But of course, this has been ongoing. Yes, things will get worse with Title 42 removed, perhaps. But we already have a major crisis when you look at the number of people coming across. And just a few people being shipped to Lala Harris's house or to New York,

other places like that, causes them to have a great deal of anger. And yet look at what is happening at border towns. It is the incentives that are brought in, but there's absolutely no interest in the Biden administration in protecting the border and having an orderly system of people crossing back and forth and trying to do something about the cartels. It's going to be very difficult to, you could allow legitimate crossing, but it's going to be difficult to stop the drug cartels. We've got a drug war that's been going on for over 50 years.

And that is the key thing. That is what has created the drug cartels. The drug cartels are there to capitalize on our failed war on drugs and they branched out into other areas in terms of human trafficking and the rest of this stuff and then of course are the people who are coming here uh desperately poor from all over uh the world but especially um central and south america who are coming for the magnet of the welfare state. Some people are coming for the magnet of jobs where they come in and are paid very little. So the corporations want it. Uh, the Republicans are supporting that Democrats as well.

The Democrats want the voters. They believe they're going to vote for them. Surprisingly, a lot of them are not in some areas because they, they are socially conservative. And so a lot of them are not voting for Democrats. Nevertheless, this whole thing about Title 42, you need to understand it is not about the border. The border is already busted. There already is uncontrolled immigration, just like there is in Europe.

That is part of the plan of the Great Reset, to erase cultures, to erase what is essentially nations, tongues, and tribes, borders, languages, and culture. They need to erase that in order to have a one-world government. And so that's why this is happening around the world. But it is really about the pandemic and the pandemic rules. And that's why this is the only thing, not DACA, not a wall, not any of the nine states that he had or something like that, that he blocked, or maybe it was seven. And there was five that were Islamic. So they said, this is an Islamic ban.

Well, two of them were not, Venezuela and North Korea. And it was not an Islamic ban because there's 50 Islamic nations. The only banned travel from five of those. These are countries that Obama went to war with for the most part. But it's not about the border. But it's about the pandemic rules. The U.S. Supreme Court rules to keep the Trump border policy in place. They said this was enacted on the grounds of keeping contagious diseases out of the United States in the midst of the so-called pandemic.

I added the so-called aspect. That was Zero Hedge summarizing that. The decision upends ruling by activist Democrat Judge Emmett Sullivan, the guy who was involved in the Michael Flynn case, but he was also involved in protecting Hillary Clinton. So we call him an activist Democrat judge. He said the Trump era policy was arbitrary and capricious. You have the Attorney's General of Arizona and Louisiana filed an emergency request for a stay, which was granted by Roberts. They're going to take a look at the policy. But again, as they point out, the 11th hour intervention will avert a predicted flood of immigrants

seeking to enter the United States at a time when border crossings are at near record highs. So we don't, Title 42 is not protecting us from that. This is about maintaining the fiction of the pandemic. This is about maintaining the authority that we're now 1,021 days into this emergency executive order. They don't care about borders. They care about orders, executive orders, giving us medical martial law. Look, the pandemic is over. They're not even trying.

It was never a pandemic. I never believed that, but they're not even trying to make the case that it's still existing. While some are trying to bring it back. As I pointed out yesterday, we have this nonsense that's happening in China. We have some local public health officials that are trying to do things like extend the moratorium on evictions in LA County in LA. You have others that are saying, well, we want to bring the mask back.

You know, Boston is saying, well, we want to put masks on school kids when they come back from Christmas break and that type of thing. So there are people who are trying to still bring that back, and they're going to bring it back if we don't take away the underlying presumed authority. And that really goes back even farther than Trump's executive order of 1,021 days ago. That goes back to December of 2001 when they put out the model state health emergency powers act and you had state by state, they enacted that model legislation. That's what needs to be overturned state by state. But it was Trump's executive

order that activated that. It was sitting there like a sleeper cell to terrorize us for two decades. And Trump gave the order to release the terrorist cells, the public health officials, and the powers that they had claimed. So Title 42 did not and does not protect the border. Yes, it will get worse, but it does not protect the border. This is why SCOTUS is protecting it. They're trying to protect medical martial law. Nothing is being done to protect the border.

Nobody's doing anything about any of these magnets drawing people across. And of course there is legitimate, there are legitimate reasons for people to cross the border, but, and those are the people who will be stopped. The terrorists, the cartel, uh, drug terrorists,

they will pass. This is the way it is with all prohibition. And understand the drug cartels are a product of our drug prohibition. But just like alcohol, did alcohol prohibition ever stop the consumption of alcohol? No. It created very powerful organized crime syndicates. And that happened with only about a decade. We're five times longer with this. It creates more concentrated forms, whatever it is you're trying to prohibit. It creates organized crime, black market monopolies. It corrupts the police. It corrupts the courts.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. It doesn't work.

But, of course, there's many different aspects to this. While we're talking about what's going on at the border, there is one bit of good news I thought worth mentioning here. That is that Arizona is considering a five and a half billion dollar water infrastructure project. They're running out of water. And quite frankly, I haven't seen, you know, you can look at these things. Is this the role of government? You can debate what government's role in infrastructure should be. But it's a refreshing change to see for once, I think. Now, there may be some details of this I'm not seeing.

I'm sure people will let me know. There's some devils in the details. But just in general, the idea that, hey, we're running out of water, maybe we should do something other than rationing, because that's what we see with energy all the time. Let's just ration the energy. And not only that, let's make this the shortage and the scarcity worse. It's a government created scarcity when it comes to energy.

And, uh, they're continuing to make it worse. So this is a situation where they're talking about the state water finance board. Past a non-binding resolution that we don't know if it's going to happen. That would put a massive desalination plant in Mexico that's going to turn the seawater into freshwater and then pump it through a pipeline across Mexico into Phoenix. 200-mile pipeline for water. It'd be interesting to see if this will actually happen. As I point out,

residents in Maricopa, Pinal and Pima counties would pay a higher water cost, but at least they would have water. It's been a long time since I've seen the government do any infrastructure projects, especially this government. I mean, they're spending unbelievable amounts of money

to destroy infrastructure, not just the energy, but even the roads. Oh, these roads are racist. Let's destroy the interstate systems built in the middle of the 20th century. Holiday sales, meanwhile, were up 7.6%. Well, that's good news, except that inflation was higher, 8.5%. So it means that they were actually down by about 1% in terms of real terms, not keeping up with inflation. Peter Schiff says, because of that and other things, he says, I'm even more bullish on gold now.

The never, not always diehard bullish Peter Schiff. He said, obviously, I've been bullish for a while, but I'm even more bullish now to the extent that's possible based on what is happening. He said, gold moves and big cycles. I think this bull market really started in 2001. So we're 20 years into it. We've had pretty big corrections from 2011 to 2015. That's when we bottomed out, he said, and we've been moving up since then. But we really haven't taken out the highs from 2011. Well, you know, that's interesting that he looks at it.

I have not seen Peter Schiff make the case for gold from a perspective of the threat of CBDC. He always talks about it in terms of, you know, uh, how, how does this going to, uh, relate to the fiat currency, to the dollar. And when he talks about Bitcoin, you know, he'll always say, well, Bitcoin is not money. Gold is money. Well, um, I talked about that in an article. One person went into a great deal of detail saying, you know, here are the different aspects of actual money. And Bitcoin has not shown itself to match those yet, still could. But he's right when he says that, uh, Bitcoin basically has been

a speculative asset. He said, Bitcoin was performing. It was going up while gold was going sideways, but Bitcoin was marketed as digital gold. That was the whole selling point. Hey, gold is obsolete. Gold is irrelevant. He said, I think that on the margins that took away some of the demand from gold, but he says, everybody's pretty much come to the conclusion now that Bitcoin is a

speculative asset. Well, it may still show itself to be money, but I tend to agree with what he's saying. But isn't it interesting that he speaks of gold as a speculative asset himself. The real value of gold is as a hedge against the central bank digital currency. It is a hedge against what they're going to do to our privacy and to our liberty. The liberty is based on privacy. And so it's about having something that's going to retain its value that is real, that is limited. That's what Bitcoin tried to mimic with the mining aspects of it. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding

specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie But, uh, the only way that you're going to protect your privacy and liberty specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care. Dot E. But, um, the only way that you're going to protect your privacy and Liberty and a CBDC surveillance state is with precious metals. That's the reality of this. And the interesting thing is that through all of this stuff, as Bitcoin was going up and gold was going sideways,

who was buying the gold, the central banks were buying the gold. Now, he's pointed that out many times, but I think it's interesting that he doesn't talk about it as what I think is far more important. When we talk about it, well, what's its price versus the price of the fiat dollar? All that stuff is manipulated,

as Tony Arterburn has pointed out many times. The price of gold is manipulated. The dollar is manipulated. All these different things. Stocks are manipulated. Bonds are manipulated. Everything is manipulated. They even manipulate gold with paper gold.

So if you got gold that you physically have, that is privacy. That is liberty. And the threat of the CBDC is the thing that you have to focus on. Because who knows with all the rigging of the CBDC is the thing that you have to focus on because who knows with all the rigging of the marketplace, what is happening, but they're going to rig our Liberty. That's what they're trying to do with a CBDC. So again, uh, Tony Arterburn and, um, he's set up davidknight.gold.

If you go there, uh, he'll know that I sent you. He's been a big supporter of the program. We really appreciate his support. Um, we had, uh, four strangers ever see the movie planes, you. He's been a big supporter of the program. We really appreciate his support. We had Four Strangers. Ever see the movie Planes, Trains, and Automobiles? It's one of our favorite films. John Candy and Steve Martin. It was a funny film. One of Hughes' films.

These guys get stuck on a Thanksgiving weekend. They've got to get home, so they wind up teaming up together to go home. We had something similar that went viral on social media for strangers who needed to get back to Ohio. They didn't know each other, you know, just like planes, trains, and automobiles, they decided they'd get together and pull the resources and rent a car. And unlike the movie, they were actually able to rent a car, uh, and drive together after their flights were canceled. And, uh, so from Tampa to Cleveland, Ohio, they said the earliest they could get us out

of there was going to be today at 6 PM. We all wanted to get back there, obviously way earlier than that. Uh, their flights were canceled. And you look at the flights that are canceled thousands of them over the weekend, of course, and, uh,

Southwest is still canceling flights. They've canceled 70% of their flights. It's like somewhere between 2000, 2,500 flights just from that one airline now. Uh, so one of the guys said, well, I mean,

he made up his mind. He'd rent a car, drive it snow and all, but he wouldn't be alone. Um, two other, uh, three other said, well, I mean, he made up his mind. He'd rent a car, drive it snow and all, but he wouldn't be alone. Um, two other, uh, three other people, uh, came along and they drove straight through for 20 hours. They didn't know each other. They said, we just looked at each other and we're like, are you in?

Yeah, we're in. Let's go for it. We didn't stop other than to get gas coffee or use the restroom. As the miles ticked down, the friendship grew stronger. Isn't this interesting? Despite the cramped space in the 2023 Kia Soul, we were all just talking to each other about super random stuff. None of us had earbuds in.

It's not like we're doing our own thing. We're just like we're going to ride along. We built a community in there. And after all the while, one person was posting updates to TikTok. On Saturday, her initial video hit 9 million views. Reading the comments out loud, everybody in the car, we were just dying laughing. We were listening to Christmas music. Every single song just hit us differently.

Like this song's trying to about how you're going to make it home for Christmas. And you're like, that's literally us. More than a thousand miles and plenty of karaoke sessions later, the band made it through the snowstorm. We got into some very deep, deep conversation about our lives and what we've been going through. We just had that connection. I had no idea when I was going to start this, that I was going to take a quiet drive home, get home, be done. He said, this has turned into a whole adventure. Well, I think that's good. I like the fact that you've got people, total strangers, and they get together and build a relationship you know we can rebuild what they've worked very hard to take away from us to isolate us isolate us with our phones isolate us with our

headphones right earbuds it reminds me of the Crosby possibly stills and Nash, uh, Nash and young song. Uh, I was with you, but you were alone. That's what I think of every time I see people setting around everybody looking at their phone, you know, if we can get those things out of our life, um, they won't be able to track us as easily. And, uh, we could, um, start to establish relationships, even with total strangers. And I always liked the reliability of being able to go where I want, when

I want with an automobile automobile, and I hate the TSA. And so I have absolutely no interest in ever flying again, anywhere. I will fight it tooth and nail. I'll do anything. I'll drive through the night. I have. We went back to Texas for Travis's wedding. But, you know, sometimes you get a different kind of adventure. Eric Peters talked about his experience with electric vehicles that he was testing. And he's got a whole slew of them now that he's tested. He's had a couple of them from Ford. He had the F-150 Lightning.

He had the Ford E-Mustang, I think they call it. It's an electric SUV. And he just wrote about an experience that he had with a Mercedes. Top of the line Mercedes, it was electric vehicle. And their top of the line electric vehicle is a headline is how the EV stole Christmas. It was kind of an off-road adventure. In other words, he didn't get to take the trip because of the vehicle. He says an attempt to visit my mom for Christmas gives a window into what life can be like when you drive an EV.

The EV I attempted to use to visit my mom, a brand new Mercedes EQS top of the line EV. It's electric version of the Mercedes S-Class sedan. Its base price is $102,000. For the one I'm driving, which has more power and 340 miles more range, the price goes up to $125,900. When it was dropped off a couple of days ago, it had only about 170 miles of putative range remaining. He says, I say putative for reasons which will show up shortly. He said, the reason the EVs I get are not left here fully charged has to do with the fact that there's no practical way to leave them here fully charged, as there are no fast chargers close to where I live. The nearest one is an EVgo 50 kilowatt hour fast charger about 25 miles away. Unfortunately, it is not very fast, even by fast charging

standards. Many people are unaware of the fact that not all fast chargers can fast charge an EV to even 80% capacity in the 30 to 45 minutes one regularly hears repeated by the media. Kind of like one heard a lot about the cases, the cases from the same media. It depends on how powerful the fast charger you plug into is. to is some of the EV go fast chargers in my area require you to wait a lot longer as in an hour or more to recover about a hundred miles of putative range. So he said, in the case of delivering me EVs, I have to start out from the Washington DC area where the press pool, uh, has the, you know, where they have the cars that's about 245 miles, 240 miles away. He said, and my place is about 30 miles from downtown Roanoke, a trip that takes four hours. Took the guy who delivered it six hours, not counting the third stop at the EV go not so

fast charger on the outskirts of Roanoke where the driver waited for probably an hour as I did to instill enough range to leave the EV with me with exactly half of its 340 putative mile range. So he says, my mom lives in a care facility about 50 miles away. So it's roughly a hundred mile trip. Ordinarily, this would only take me about five gallons of gas to power my 20 mile per gallon truck there and back. And he says, but remember, the EQS was not left here fully charged. The day it was dropped off, I used it to go down to the gym and back, a round trip of about 50 miles. But it used up 70 miles of the originally indicated amputative range of 170 miles. This seems to be typical. All the EVs I've driven thus far suffer a loss in the actual range of 10 to 20%,

probably because I live in a mountainous rather than a flat area, and driving the extra load causes it to go up and down. But it's also been very cold there. He said my short trip of about 50 miles left about a hundred miles of indicated or putative range remaining when I got back home. So he wasn't confident he's going to make it there and back because that was, uh, going to be a hundred miles, even if it didn't,

uh, take more range. So he said he plugged in the EQS. So that was about 2 PM on Thursday before Christmas weekend on Friday morning, the car had acquired only 22 more miles of putative range, uh, cause he's plugging it in to a one 20 volt,

uh, house current. He did that for 18 hours and it got 22 miles more of range. At live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. for 18 hours and it got 22 miles more of range. At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement,

the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet

up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee why so little range

acquired in the first place because recharging a high voltage ev battery using 120 volt household outlets takes a really long time under the best of circumstances. But, he says, when you're doing it under less than ideal circumstances, such as the car not being parked inside a heated garage, but tethered to a wall outlet inside the garage while it is parked outside in bitter cold weather, which is what we're having in Virginia this Christmas weekend. The EV is trying to keep its battery pack warm, which is why I awoke to just 122 miles of indicated putative range

showing up on Friday morning. Remember the story that I had a couple of days ago about the guy who also could not make a trip home to see family with his EV? He tried charging it at home. Nothing's happening. First, he tried charging it at a supercharging station. Nothing happened. He took it home.

Nothing really happened. So I'm going to go back and do it again. And when he went back the second time to try it, um, he took pictures of it. What it would do was say, you know, keep it plugged in. We're heating the battery and it just stayed that way. And it never charged the battery had to evidently heat it first before it could charge it. And that was in 19 degree Fahrenheit weather. What he is saying here is that in Virginia, where he was, it was nine degrees.

So I'm surprised that it charges at all, frankly. So he says, when you run out of a charge with an EV, you're dead in the water, or rather by the side of the road. And you're going to be there for a while in the cold without heat because in an EV, the heat is generated from the battery that you don't have. There's no practical way to walk back with the equivalent of a couple of gallons of gas to get going against and to avoid freezing.

So you have to be very, especially in the winter, very, very careful of range. So he said, I thought it'd be a good idea to take it to the EV go fast charger, make a long story short. He goes there and the power was down in the entire shopping center. This is another problem with everybody being on the grid because the grid is losing capacity and

reliability on a continuing basis like i said about infrastructure so i they look to see where the next closest fast charger was um they had power but it would not take his credit card they demanded that he get an app uh to use this particular, with EVgo, the company called EVgo. No doubt to dodge the user along the path to a digital currency, but the app would not load while we were sitting there. So he had to go home. He loaded the app and then he goes back, but they still could not get the fast charger to really get them anywhere. So they wound up canceling the trip, uh, on the EV. He said, um, as far as saying my mom will be taking the truck.

So he had a truck as a backup. And, um, so he didn't lose the trip like the other guy did, but, uh, I had a, um, person write me and I don't want to, um, identify identify him he didn't say it was okay to identify him but he works for ford in a senior position and he's contacted me before and i i don't recall if i uh he contacted me about nitrogen and emissions in general and stuff i don't remember if i i read that it was a very interesting email i I meant to cover it on air. I'm going to go back because it'd be worth it going back to get it again. But he said in terms of what Eric Peters and I were talking about in terms of charging stations, he said, because Eric was reviewing

Fords, he said, Ford has actually mentioned not covering the warranty on vehicles that use these repeatedly. That's where he works is at Ford. Of course, all the data is stored. Listen to this. The data is stored on board and subsequently sent to Ford directly through a cell phone type network. As Eric Peters was saying, you know, if you use these super fast charging networks, the faster you charge the battery, the more wear and tear there is on the battery and it reduces its life. And they know that. And so what is interesting about this is that he said Ford, and I'm sure all of them, you know, Tesla records everything that you're doing, all your driving habits and they all do because they can. And so they're recording how many times you charge your battery and how you charge

your battery is a slow trickle charge on a home outlet, uh, or is it a supercharger or really fast supercharger? So they keep track of that thing. And they've even talked about not covering the warranty on vehicles that use fast chargers too frequently. That is another factor that will probably be coming down the road after they get everybody corralled, after they've killed all the internal combustion engines, and more importantly, killed the refining of fuel.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet

up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is Total Betting. Sign 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly

18 plus gambling care.ee and they've got us where they want us then they can start doing things like well you know we noticed uh if we read the fine print of your warranty you're not allowed to supercharge these things more than x number of times and you did that so you're not allowed to supercharge these things more than X number of times. And you did that. So, uh, we're not going to cover any warranties. He said, also, Eric did not mention the cost of these batteries and this, uh, F one 50 lightning truck that he reviewed. For example, he said it is $30,000 to replace the battery. Now this is a car that, um, I mean the hunt, the upper range was just under a hundred grand. I think the lower range, I don't remember

what the lower range was. Um, but I know that the upper range was about a hundred dollars and it's a big range between the, uh, the upper and lower models of the f-150 but we're talking about even with the upper range where you're paying for you know a lot of uh you're paying for upgraded interior and a lot of other things like that it's still a third of the cost of the car so he says keep in mind they're. They break down into 10 to 12 different modules that can be replaced separately. $8,000 or so for those. So if one of the modules goes bad, you know, $8,000, if you got to replace all of them, $30,000, but like any other lithium battery, they must be pre-balanced before installation.

Oh, well, maybe you just can't replace them one at a time. Uh, so, uh, anyway, the re the rest of it was, um, kind of personal. I appreciate the, uh, uh, the personal messages and the compliments. Uh, thank you very much. And I won't mention his name because he didn't say it was okay to, but, uh, somebody who knows, well, let's talk a little bit about, um, what's coming up next year. As a matter of fact, I might as well tell you now, I'm going to be taking tomorrow off. It looks like we're going to have a break in the weather

and haven't been able to get out of the house for a week, and I'm going a little bit stir-crazy. So we're going to take advantage of that, and we're going to take two days this week, uh, we're going to take two days this week. So Thursday and Friday, we will have rebroadcasts of best of interviews, recent interviews that will be rebroadcasting. So this will be the final show of the week, the final show of the year.

So let's talk about what's coming up in 2023. Nostradamus predicted for 2023 Fox news has got it. I'm sorry. New York post, New York post has got it. Uh, an antichrist arises world war three and the monarchy dies. Well, it's gotta be the British monarchy then. Right. Uh, I want to know what Julie green thinks, you know, this, this false

prophet of the Maga cult who predicted that so many times that Trump is going to be reinstalled, uh, said, I'm speaking for God. God says to you, Herschel Walker, you are in, you're going to win. And what is surprising about all this is that you still have Michael Flynn, the guy running this, uh, dog and pony show across the country of Michael Flynn and, uh, you know, the usual, uh, Trump grifters, but, um, and Eric Trump, they're still talking to her like, uh, she's solid gold. I mean, she has had one false prophecy after the other, but, you know, Nostradamus, I think is kind of interesting. And it immediately makes me think of the Trump cult and QAnon.

Because the first thing I said about QAnon is, so first of all, I'm not going down that road because it's an anonymous thing. I don't care about anonymous sources. If somebody is not willing to go on record about it, about this type of thing then that immediately makes it suspect are we being played is it true so it's anonymous but worse than that i said you take an anonymous source that writes and riddles and quatrains like

nostradamus that's what i said about q anon from the very beginning i said it's likeostradamus. That's what I said about QAnon from the very beginning. I said, it's like Nostradamus. And here we are 500 years later, and people are still trying to read stuff into Nostradamus' prophecies. They're very cryptic. And, um, uh, you know, it is, it's absolutely ludicrous. Uh, how many times, no matter, uh no matter, when you have this cryptic stuff, people can always say, well, you know, Nostradamus didn't get it wrong. We just interpreted the quatrains or whatever incorrectly. So he didn't really mean that when it fails. Now, Julie Green doesn't have that kind of help because she's very specific. She's very specific about certain things.

And she's not the only one. I've had some people send me some other people as well. There's a lot of them that are out there trying to grift off the Trump cult. They're very specific. They usually make the mistake of only predicting things that are a few months away, like she did with the election of Herschel Walker, like she did with the reinstallation of Donald Trump so many times. So she makes these prophecies about things that are going to happen in the next couple of months. So she's speaking for God and then they fail. You know, even the false prophets and the Cassandras of the climate movement, at least they're smart enough to make their false prophecies a couple of decades, several decades away from us, right? That protects them.

But she is foolish enough to make these false prophecies a couple of months away. And she keeps getting away with it. So I guess she's not foolish. I guess, you know, she knows her audience. Anyway, he wrote this stuff in 1555. This is the New York Post talking. Why I said at first it was Fox, because it's a Rupert Murdoch publication.

Nostradamus gifted the world and its future generations a quasi-poetic tome that predicts wars, pestilence, natural disasters, civil unrest, political assassinations, and other such sunny stuff. Heavy on language like blood and rain, the blood rain, rather, the book is an enduring classic. And with 2023 on the horizon, we're taking a look at what fury and hellfire lays in store. But first let's look back to the last year, which they typically don't do. Uh, Nostradamus predictions for last year included the rise of AI.

Did that happen? I don't recall. Maybe I missed that. Uh, the conquering power of cryptocurrency. Did that happen? I don't recall. Maybe I missed that. The conquering power of cryptocurrency. Now, I'd like to know, they don't go into details in the New York Post, and I would like to know how this guy in 1555 predicted cryptocurrency. That is something so alien to what he could imagine it has to be something

that is reading into the text something that is not there by these people and then he predicted a surge in cannibalism as a response to inflation well i would really like to see how they had twisted this stuff. That all sounds like contemporary backfilling to me. So how did he do? Well, while Bitcoin has gone bust, inflation remains at an all-time high. And then you have Dahmer the Monster, Netflix's controversial ode to the famous flesh eater. Second most watched show in the network's history. There's definitely interest in cannibalism.

I don't know that people are actually practicing it like Nostradamus would have predicted. But Hollywood is definitely interested in it, just like they're interested in pedophilia and every other perversion that you can imagine. But now audiences are interested in it as well, I guess. So for the next year, he predicts imminent marine annihilation. Like the sun, the head shall sear the shining sea. The black seas living fish shall all but boil.

The New York Post says, well, this one checks out. Oh, we know that's going to happen. How do they know this is going to happen? Well, because they've got the climate Cassandras telling us that. Oh, yeah, experts are suggesting that many of the most commonly eaten fish species could face extinction as a direct result of climate change warming. That's where the boiling comes from. Yeah. Uh, that's the way they twist this stuff. And these people are foolish enough to believe the climate Cassandra is they're going to believe Nostradamus as well.

Uh, Buckingham palace ablaze. Well, where'd they get that from? Because Buckingham palace did not exist in 1555, just like cryptocurrency didn't exist in 1555. Well, Nostradamus predicted that we will see celestial fire on the Royal edifice. Well, could that mean that a meteor is headed straight for Buckingham palace, burning down the house, if you will, or in a more metaphorical area, uh, take, could it be that, uh, Harry, the man formerly known as Prince, as I call him

and Megan, will their bombshell Netflix series, will that take down the Buckingham Palace? I mean, see how they stretch this stuff. It's like, it's what Jerome Corsi did. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

Last time I interviewed him, because I said never again, 48 hours of race main market, excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gambling care. Dot E. Last time I interviewed him because I said never again, um, it came on my show and, uh, it was during the transition period. Let's see. Was it? No, it's not 2017. It was, uh, I think 2018. Yeah.

2018. And he made, he said, well, look at what's just come out of QAnon. Uh, it says the bird flies with a, uh, red and white cross or something like that. So he goes, that means that Julian Assange is going to be freed into Switzerland. And I said, oh, really? We'll see about that. I didn't believe it then. This is such a, but Jerome Corsi rode that QAnon thing to fame and fortune. He was very, very big in it before it turned on him. And he, you know, had books that he was advertising on national radio. He advertised on Rush Limbaugh. He made a fortune selling Brooks, but it was total nonsense. He knew it. Alex knew it.

To me, I looked at it and it didn't come up to the level of the betrayal of 2020, but I still was not interested in having him back on again. Anyway, he also predicts seven months great war, people dead through evil. Well, they said this could be what's happening in Ukraine. Well, the problem is Ukraine has already been going for nine months. Uh, so no, I don't think so. And then finally the antichrist will come says the New York post based on the prophecies of Nostradamus. He says, um, the antichrist very soon annihilates the three. 27 years his war will last.

The unbelievers are dead, captive, exiled with blood, human bodies, water, and red hail covering the earth. Well, you know, the Bible has a lot of very specific things, really, about what's going to happen at the end of time. Uh, they don't put a timeframe on it though. Make it very clear. Nobody knows when that's going to happen. Uh, but you know, there's, uh, other ways to understand what is happening with this. You know, when you look at the Bible and the little bit that it says about, uh, the mark of the beast, everybody needing to have a number to buy or sell anything, all that stuff, even when I was a child,

I thought, well, that's got to be metaphorical. It's looking pretty literal now, isn't it? And Nostradamus was in 1555. He spoke in riddles. The Bible was very explicit and was 1,500 years before him. And it's looking like it's coming true. So this was sent to me from a listener. Saw this on healthimpact.com, healthimpactnews.com.

Says, have you noticed more self-checkout lanes at your grocery store and other local stores what does this mean where is this all headed how will it affect you should you be concerned as amazon whole foods is now rolling out some uh new aspects of it this is the way it's covered on health impact news dot com, uh, satanic merchant model of marking and tracking every customer. And he begins the article by referring to the mark of the beast. No one could buy or sell unless he had the mark of the beast. And of course, uh, for the longest time, uh, everybody considered, uh, all, you know, people have, uh, for centuries understood that the beast is a

metaphorical reference to government. So it's the mark of the government. He said, 20 years ago, my family and I moved back to the U S after spending several years in the Philippines, we found a wonderful new food market in California called whole foods. It wasn't perfect as it still had tons of commodity food mass produced, but it also had organic and other food options that were better choices than the big box grocery stores. But then Bezos bought Whole Foods, merged it together with Amazon. And Brian, who has healthimpactnews.com and vaccine impact has his online store. He says, my own online store stopped selling on Amazon years before when we no longer had access to our customers who purchased our products at Amazon. And so Amazon went from becoming our partner to becoming our competitor, stealing our customers. And of course, this has been happening.

That is kind of the business model that we've seen from Amazon, many others. As soon as Amazon bought Whole Foods, they gave up all their goals of offering more foods that did not contain genetically modified organisms in the future. In 2020, I stopped going there altogether because it was getting more and more difficult to shop there without wearing a mask. And after getting harassed one day about not wearing a mask, I got in line to check out and saw a sign that said that they were no longer accepting cash because of COVID only credit cards. So he said, that was the last straw for me. Uh, while they did start accepting cash again in their stores, they rolled out several new features to test in public, moving towards the goal of having all purchases being done strictly through

their app. Right? Just like Eric trying to charge his Evie, you're going to buy an app and we're going to get some information from you. So we can now track everything that you do moving everybody towards CVDC. So tracking everything you do in their stores, they have a, in a couple of stores that they've now rolled this out. And this is a viral video that has gone out.

Uh, as you enter, it says, uh, just walk out. So you scan a QR code to enter and to shop that way. And then throughout the store, there are cameras everywhere and all kinds of things to track everything that you do. Wi-Fi signals, tracking everything you do, cameras, scanning what products you put into your cart, what you take out. It's being tested right now in Washington, D.C. and in L.A. And there was a person took a video of it and he says, well, you know that this begins with a QR code. He said, um, you can still enter the store without

participating in this just walk out system. Uh, there is a pay at the register lane in the video. So you can enter one of these stores without the QR code. That's only if you don't, if you want to just walk out, you've got to show the QR code to identify yourself. And then they start scanning things and watching you the entire time. He said, I also searched for some recent videos that people took of the self

checkout option. And apparently you can also still use cash to check out there for now. But when they eventually have the technology to roll this out nationally, they very well could eliminate the cash payment option as they have done in the past during COVID. So a press release from Whole Foods talks about the just walk out shopping option. And the QR codes, as he points out, are already old technology. They can easily be hacked and you have to have a smartphone. They're going to go to biometric scanning.

Amazon has rolled out what will eventually replace the QR code, which is biometric scanning of your hand through a service that they have called Amazon One. This technology will probably quickly evolve to scanning other body parts, such as your face, your ears. This technology to implant a chip in your body somewhere already exists, but I think that they'll go with the hand and the face, the visual stuff. It'll be less intrusive. And I think one of the things that's going to accelerate this adoption,

he doesn't have it in the article i think what will accelerate this is the and i think it possibly could be one of the reasons why you have these democrat district attorneys stopping all intervention or prosecution of shoplifting the extent that the big chain stores are losing hundreds of millions, I think it was $400 million that Target alone lost to shoplifting. Well, if you've got these kind of monitors there and you've got facial recognition, that basically puts an end to shoplifting. That in and of itself would be enough to get the stores to implement this. And Amazon is getting in on the ground floor by creating the database. And they're selling that to other people in the same way that Spotify,

the only place where my program is not allowed in terms of podcasts, Spotify, unlike the other podcasts, are looking very closely at content. And of course, you all know that I talk about things all the time. You look at the Twitter files, everything that they were searching for and banning people. These are things that I talk about almost exclusively. So I'm banned from Spotify. And Spotify is selling that software to other podcasts because you want to know what is in the podcast before you sell it to advertisers.

A year ago, when I first started monetizing the podcast on Spreaker, I had a lot of commercials from Pfizer. I thought it was kind of funny. I did. I don't listen to the show when it goes up. So I don't know how that, that operates, but, um, you know, what, what commercials are there? I don't really track who is advertising on the podcast, but I had listeners who are writing me saying, you know, do you know Pfizer is advertising?

I said, well, that's not going to last. And I had some people accuse me of selling out. You're a sellout. You're advertising Pfizer. You don't really oppose this stuff. And it's like, okay, we'll see. Well, that didn't last, but for just a couple of weeks. And so Spotify wants to make it very clear, you know, what is being discussed and to shut people down. And they're pushing that out to other podcasts. So they will eventually push me off with that. But anyway, I think it'll, the thing's really going to drive this just walk out stuff and

Amazon one and the scanning and the cameras everywhere is going to be the shoplifting that has been put into overdrive by Democrat district attorneys. And remember, 2017, I've mentioned this many times, Obama and Eric Holder were talking about how they're going to work with Soros to fund district attorney races and state attorneys, general races, and how they were going to, um, you know, put their people in and we know what their people look like. They look like Chesa Bodine who has put out, looks like, uh, Eric, I think his first name is Eric Gascon, the guy in LA, uh,

who want to not prosecute crime, but create chaos. If you've got a big chain like target that loses $400 million, they would be more than happy to make the investment in cameras and scanners to stop that. A recent article published on Forbes, uh, that Brian has on, um, healthimpactnews.com talks about the process after a cashier rang up my purchase at whole foods, I got my Amazon prime member discounts and I paid with my credit card. That doesn't sound unusual, but what might be surprising is that I did it with a single palm scan,

holding my hand a few inches over the Amazon one scanner next to the cash register did everything. No reaching for a phone, no reaching for a wallet, no need to scan an app or swipe a card or anything else. Just use my hand. Just that easy. Amazon, of course, doesn't have a lock on biometric checkout, says Forbes. In China, retailers have been using facial recognition for contactless checkout for years. LA-based PopID is testing facial recognition in a variety of restaurant and retail partners.

MasterCard is testing both facial recognition and hand scanning along with fingerprint card authentication. And understand, MasterCard has been one of the foremost pushers of this with the World Economic Forum and UN. They are one of the biggest sponsors of a global ID, is MasterCard. And, of course, they want it to be face and hand scanning. Do you ever think that perhaps, you know, when you read in Revelation,

the mark of the beast, you know, the hand and the forehead, that type of thing. I don't know, but I wonder if the way that that was understood is scanning of the face and scanning of the hand. That's a quantification biometric ID that requires you to have that. The government requires you to have that in order to buy and sell. So anyway, they created this for their own stores, but they're marketing it just like Spotify is marketing their podcast censorship program. So how do we stop this?

Well, as Brian says, don't use it. It's that simple. Make up your mind right now. The conveniences of technology are not worth the loss of freedom. And, um, you're not going to allow the globalist technocrats to have access to every part of our personal lives so they can enslave us.

You got to have something to get out of the CBDC. We've got to create an alternative economy locally. Start looking at people where you can get your food locally because they're going to shut you out of the system. Remember when we had the COVID lockdown? There's this couple in Norway, and they were talking about how they were unvaccinated. They couldn't buy food. They couldn't buy clothing. It already kicked off.

That was a trial run. That was normalization of all of this stuff, building it, getting you used to it. Here's a first, take a couple of steps forward and then a couple of steps back for the moment. You know, another step back. They left that there just like they left the executive orders. He says a business stops allowing cash payment, stop shopping there. Support businesses and your community,

even if you have to pay a bit more. I would say that it's appropriate the way they labeled this thing. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham

with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gamblingcare.ie just walk out. We'll be right back. © transcript Emily Beynon And now, The David Knight Show. Well, we have close by in Knoxville, Tennessee. The mayor attends an all-ages Christmas drag show. I thought, wait a minute. I've had Glenn Jacobs, who's mayor of Knoxville. He's mayor of the county.

I got my attention. It's like, no, it's not i looked i got my attention it's like no it's not him i mean i couldn't and it's not him they have a you know so there is a city mayor just like in texas we have uh the head official for the county they call him a judge you know like judge roy bean well here in here in Tennessee, the top elected official countywide is called the mayor. So, you know, Knoxville actually has two mayors in a sense, I guess. But the mayor of the city, Knoxville, is a Democrat and was happy to brag about attending a lewd Christmas-themed drag show marketed for all ages. And that's according to Breitbart, the Democrat mayor, India,

Ken Cannon bragged on Facebook that she attended a drag queen Christmas in Knoxville and a post on Facebook. She said, so glad to be at a drag queen Christmas with so many Mary Knoxville folks. Well, we've seen this, uh, what the show looks like. It's been on a national tour.

Taylor Hanson went to it to report about it, uh, in Austin, Texas. He took video of the event. I'm not going to show the video because it's, um, uh, it's pretty obscene. Actually a drag queen can be seen talking to a nine-year-old and praising a mom for bringing her child while she's wearing a costume with fake breasts that look very real. Um, and, um, I say she, it's a guy and another clip, two men dressed in revealing reindeer costumes, simulate sex with each other. Uh, Taylor Austin estimated there were roughly 20 children there.

So this has created a lot of pushback in Knoxville against this. And so people have contacted, uh, the other mayor of the County, Glenn Jacobs. They've contacted the representative of the state representative, Jason Zachary. So, Hey, what's going on? Why are you guys allowing this to be done with kids present? Right.

Isn't there something you can do to stop this? And so he put out a Jason Zachary and I said, well, uh, I, we have talked as both I and you know, mayor Jacobs has have talked to, uh, the district attorney here as well as to the state attorney general. And they both tell us there's nothing that they can do. There's not any law on the books, but as a state representative, I'm going to change that. That's, I can tell you, this is going to change.

We've already had other state representatives in Tennessee say they're going to classify drag queen shows as cabarets. And once they make that, then you have a law that kicks in that says kids can't go to cabarets. I don't understand though. You know, this is like the DeSantis grand jury thing over the vaccines. I don't understand why there isn't, they, they, he said local law enforcement was going to be there to monitor the show. And, um, there was an expectation that the performers would not be interacting

with any children present in the audience. I don't see they have to interact with them like they did in Austin. Lewd, lascivious behavior in the presence of children, exhibitionist behavior in the presence of children has always been a crime. And it doesn't even have to be in the presence of children to be a crime. I remember when we were living in Raleigh, there was a judge who went to a Christmas or New Year's party, and he got drunk, and he went out and relieved himself in the backyard.

But he was in the presence of a lot of other people. And he got into a criminal charge. He got bumped off of the bench. I mean, we doing this kind of stuff with, um, kids in attendance in the place. You don't have to have a direct interaction. This judge didn't interact with anybody. It was so drunk. He didn't know anybody else was there.

It wasn't, this is. It wasn't intentional. But it still was, you know, it was what it was. And I don't understand how this is not lewd, lascivious behavior and exhibitionism and presence of children. I don't understand how that does not change everything on this. It seems to me like it should well let's talk a little bit about other kinds of exhibition movies been a lot of that kind of lewd exhibitionism with maybe that's how this whole thing is just overlooked i don't know uh you know rate it pg-13 or rated r or whatever uh james cameron says that he cut out 10 minutes of avatar 2's

gun violence because it made him sick to his stomach he says i don't want to fetishize guns anymore well let's talk about editing so just weird blue alien people fetish then yeah yeah an environmental climate uh change fetishes you know those he's got his fetishes and and he uh yeah it's a it's a weird environmental religion type of thing that he's got going here well let's talk about editing he cut 10 minutes of gun violence out uh the movie is two hours and 42 minutes long. I think he could have cut a lot of other things out of there if he'd had a good editor. And that's the problem. Uh, you're typically a movie is 90 minutes long. I've talked about this in the past.

You had a guy, I think his name is Blake Snyder. I'm thinking it's been a while since I read it, but it was save the cat. And he talked about how, you know, the magic length for movies, because everybody's used to this. Now they've been doing it so long that it's used to it. And they very deliberately talk about timing and beats. And it's standard length is 90 minutes and studios always want to make it that way. And so you'll have fights and the big directors will say,

no, I'm a, you know, my movie is going to run however long I want to go. And most of them can't pull it off. Some of the action films a, you know, my movie is going to run however long I want it to go. And most of them can't pull it off. Some of the, uh, action films like, uh, you know, before Marvel got bought by Disney and went woke, um, they were able to pull off, uh, two hours, you know, an action film, uh, dark, uh, winter soldier with, um, uh, I thought that was a good film and you never noticed,

uh, that kept things moving fast enough. You didn't notice it, but most people inherently understand it. And as, um, as, uh, Blake put in and save the cat, he talks about how there's certain beats, you know? And so by this amount of time, first, you're going to come in, you're going to introduce the world that everybody's in. There's going to be some fun and games. You're going to get to know the characters and how they're living and all that kind of thing. And then there's going to be other things that happen. You get bills to a climax and there's a dark night of the soul where the protagonist is faced with his difficult situation. And, um, then

everything turns and he wins, you know, has a happy ending. That's another Hollywood standard, you know, but 90 minutes is, is what they want to do. He flaunts that convention to go nearly three hours and brags about the fact that he cut 10 minutes out because it was about guns. This is interesting to me because, you know, the only movies that I've watched, I didn't like a Titanic. It was a curiosity to see the recreation of the ship, but I didn't care for the movie at all. But, um, you know, when you look, he says, I don't know if I would want to fetishize

the gun like I did on a couple of Terminator movies 30 years ago. That's what made his career. And, uh, he did, you know, Terminator one and two, he did aliens. As far as I'm concerned, that's the only good stuff that James Cameron has done. And, uh, he did those when he was married to his wife, who was co-producing it. So I don't know how much of that was him and how much of that was his wife. Anyway, he says it's safe to assume he's talked about doing another Terminator. It's safe to assume, said Variety, that action scenes, if the Terminator franchise comes back will look a bit different. The director recently made headlines on a podcast teasing that a new Terminator movie

is being talked about. The franchise has experienced one box office flop, Terminator Genesis, and after another Terminator Dark Fate in recent years. Dark Fate was a huge box office bomb with only $261 million worldwide. He said, though, if I were to do another Terminator film, I would make it much more about the AI side of it than bad robots gone crazy. Well, that's got bomb written all over it, don't you think? He's going to want to see that.

No action in it. You know, that's the guy cut his teeth on action films. He did get tremendous amount of box office with a Titanic. He's not getting that with avatar too. It's dropped 58% in the second weekend. And I talked about before this, um, I don't know. I don't like to use the term woke. Let's just say politically correct movie was coming out.

There was already discussions about how he was bragging. I went to the Disney executives and I told them, this is going to have to be the all-time box office hit ever. And for it to even break even. And I said, go for it. This is so important to do this. Well, Disney is facing box office disaster again. As a second weekend, it dropped off by 60%. Uh, what they say in the

trade is it looks like it doesn't have legs. It isn't going to last. And so far, uh, it has grossed $279 million domestically, a very weak beginning for a movie that was hyped so much and in such wide distribution. The figure suggests the movie is having trouble generating the kind of repeat viewing that propelled the first Avatar to be the highest grossing movie of all time. Globally, it has so far grossed $881 million, but the movie had an estimated production budget of $460 million, which doesn't include the massive marketing costs. They always spend more to market it

than they do to make it, meaning that it will have to gross between $1.5 billion to $2 billion to just break even, and it's dropping off pretty quickly. So it's at 0.8, and it's got off pretty quickly so it's at 0.8 and it's got to go it's got to double that or nearly triple that and it's dropping off it's a big disappointment in china the first one was a hit there not this one not at all i don't know what it is about hollywood well i do know what it is is this this pc thing is completely taking them over. And that's one of the reasons why they decided the green light avatar was because it has such a PC orientation. But,

um, you've got now yet another Sherlock Holmes saying that this thing came out in September, for example, but this is a good example of where they are. People are constantly doing Sherlock Holmes adaptations. And so now we've got to do, we've got to go where nobody's gone before.

Netflix does a Sherlock Holmes where they have Sherlock Holmes, younger sister, Enola Holmes. I watched the trailer of this thing. She, she breaks the fourth wall. You know, she talks directly to the audience. It looks like a total train wreck. Critics loved it though, because it's so politically correct. And you look at the pictures there. She's, um, got a, a, a black housekeeper. Uh, she is in a martial arts orientation, you know, because, uh, Sherlock Holmes is all about action, wasn't he?

Yeah, no. Uh, and a young female critics loved it. They gave it 91 audiences gave it 71. Uh, that is another indication of, um, at live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet

up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Critical correctness. We'll be right back. Thank you. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, let's talk about what is happening with war and peace. We have some very disturbing trends. As many people pointed out, this omnibus bill is a declaration of war, direct war. The omnibus bill that the Senate just passed not only arms Ukraine to the teeth,

but includes a provision to steal seized Russian assets and give them to Ukraine. Lindsey Graham put in an amendment to seize Russian oligarchs' assets and transfer them to the people of Ukraine. That passed by a voice vote. And this is fulfilling what Putin and others have been saying, that the purpose of this, and Lindsey Graham has been making this very clear. Let's take all of the assets that were frozen and let's steal them. Let's this is not going to end, says Lindsey Graham, until we assassinate Putin. They're not interested in peace.

They're going to escalate this in the coming year. The U.S. is giving Ukraine nearly double Russia's entire annual military budget of $65 billion. Senator Mike Lee attempted to hold the bill up in an amendment defending Title 42, but Schumer came up with a procedural trick to get around it. And of course, he had the help of Mitch McConnell, who says the most important thing is Ukraine. It's more important than what is happening in your life here. And it's more important than the risks of a nuclear war. Mitch McConnell and Democrats have been working to pass the omnibus bill, says Information Liberation, before a self-imposed deadline of Thursday

to avoid a shutdown that, you know, last week, of course they did it. They could have passed a continuing resolution, but they didn't do it. So this is part of the $1.7 trillion bill is to give these Patriot missiles and many other things to Ukraine and to accelerate the time that it would normally take to deploy them. So Putin, meanwhile, is saying he's ready to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war, but Ukraine and to accelerate the time that it would normally take to deploy them. So Putin, meanwhile, is saying he's ready to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war, but the West wants to tear Russia apart. Why would he say that?

Would it be Lindsey Graham? You know, the, um, he's taken over from John McCain, his mentor, and he's out there saying, yeah, we got to assassinate Putin, but we got to steal their assets. This is, again, what Alexander Dugan and other advisors to Putin have been pointing out. The purpose of NATO is to completely destroy Russia. That's why even Henry Kissinger came out and said, you know, that's not really a good idea. We'd wind up with a nuclear war. We could wind up, even if we don't have a nuclear war, we could wind up with this kind of a civil war, uh, within Russia, all these different territories

breaking up, it's a, it's not an ethnically uniform, a country that's got all these different groups there. And, uh, who knows who's going to get control of the nuclear weapons in a Sunday interview Putin said the country is now ready to negotiate an end to the conflict in Ukraine however he once again pointed the finger at the West for making any dialogue towards an acceptable end to the fighting all but impossible he said we're not the ones refusing to negotiate they are we have no other choice but to protect our citizens or to protect himself I mean you back the guy in the corner uh you know this is um no telling what he's going to do it gets very dangerous at the core of it all is the policy of our geopolitical opponents aiming

to tear Russia the historical Russia apart they have always tried to divide and conquer. Our goal is something else, to unite the Russian people. A State Department spokesperson reached out, reacted to Putin's unprecedented word choice, saying that since February the 24th, the U.S. and the rest of the world knew that Putin's, quote, special military operation was an unprovoked, unjustified war against Ukraine. Finally, after 300 days, he said, Putin called the war what it is, because he said, our goal is not to spin the flywheel of a military conflict, but on the contrary, to end this war. I said, oh, finally, he calls it a war instead of a special military

operation. But the State Department didn't respond to the other part of what he had to say. Spinning the flywheel of a military conflict. What's that about? Well, you know, flywheel is there to maintain momentum, right? And that's really what they have. It's kind of a, you know, let's keep this momentum of a war going for the military industrial complex. So again, Lindsey Graham, besides saying, let's steal all the assets that we froze, just turn them over to Ukraine.

He says the war will only end if Putin is taken out. This is the second time he's called for Putin to be assassinated. First time back in March. He said the U.S. should give Ukraine gray eagle drones to kill tons of Russians. This guy is literally crazy. Lindsey Graham. I don't know what's the matter with the people of South Carolina. They keep electing him. If, in fact, they are.

I know how corrupt the elections are. Anyway, he's repeated the call for him to be assassinated that he put back in March. He says, how does this war end? Well, when Russia breaks and they take Putin out, anything short of that war is going to continue, said Lindsey Graham. Somebody needs to expose this guy's background. He is as phony as George Santos. In terms of his sexual orientation, except in the other way, you know, George Santos pertaining to be homosexual while he actually is a heterosexual

married, he's so ashamed of it. Uh, somebody needs to explain to the people of South Carolina, what everybody else in the world can see about Lindsey Graham and then maybe that would make a difference. They certainly don't care about him pushing for nuclear war. Maybe they would care about his sexual orientation, anything to get this guy out of office because maybe this, uh, military industrial complex push to start a world war three is only going to

end when we get Lindsey Graham out of office. Graham said the U S is in it to win it. The only way you're going to win it is to break the Russian military, have somebody in Russia, take out put, give the Russian people a new lease on life. Just a little puppet of the deep state CIA. Lindsey Graham.

When asked to what extent the U S should continue to support Ukraine in the war, Graham said completely all in what extent the U.S. should continue to support Ukraine in the war, Graham said, completely, all in, without any equivocation. McCain and Graham, two murderers. He said if Ukraine had larger drones such as Reapers and Gray Eagles, Ukraine could kill tons of Russians without losing any Ukrainians in the endeavor. Well, that's what they're looking to get. But, you know, the interesting thing is, why is Lindsey so desperate to kill Putin

if we have all these reports that are constantly surfacing, especially in the British press, that he's on death's door? You know, he's been diagnosed with pretty much every illness, and he may be sick. I mean, some of these pictures look pretty, pretty interesting, but now you've got this from the daily mail at the same time that Lindsey Graham says, we got to end this by, by killing Putin. Well, Putin is being kept according to daily mail. Putin is being kept alive on Western cancer drugs.

Um, so that's what they're saying. You know, I don't know. You know, we we we heard that about osama bin laden didn't we uh yeah he's uh what was it they called him at the cia's name when they're bringing him the pentagon all this kind of stuff uh there's osman or something like i can't forget i can't remember what his first name was uh but um yeah he was uh roaming the mountains of of afghan Afghanistan for the longest time when we were told that he needed a kidney dialysis machine.

He survived for years somehow. Um, Vladimir Putin is being kept alive to wage war in Ukraine by foreign doctors, despite Western sanctions imposed on him and his regime. Well, you know, that is, uh, that's more believable than the narrative about bin Laden. But at the same time, he is coming back at Lindsey Graham and others saying— Tim Osman, I believe, was— Tim Osman. That was it.

Yeah, good job. Thank you. Yeah, couldn't remember the first name that they used for Osama bin Laden when he was a CIA operative Good job. Thank you. Yeah. Couldn't remember the first name that they use for Osama bin Laden when he was, uh, CIA operative, uh, coming into the Pentagon there working against the Russians, you know, that it's this whole thing, uh, yeah, and it was John McCain. Who's going around, uh, raising, doing fundraisers with Republican women saying, you know, you want to sponsor a moosh Moosha Hadeem.

Right. Uh, yeah. Give us some money. We'll sponsor a moosh in Afghanistan. The criminal is warning of consequences as it ledges us as mulling the physical elimination of Putin. Why would he think that? Um, yeah, I mean, where do you get that idea?

Was it from Lindsay or, or who I, uh, if there says a Pentagon has actually threatened to inflict a decapitation blow in the Kremlin. In fact, uh, we're talking about the threat of the physical removal of the head of the Russian state. And so we take that very seriously. Of course it is an escalation. Uh, but, um, at the same time, Putin's got his own, uh, assassination

things that are happening. We had yet another person defenestrated. And all the signs point to Putin. Two Russian nationals, including a Putin critic, found dead in a hotel in India. Russian politician and businessman Pavel Antov found lying in a pool of his blood outside a hotel in eastern India. Russian politician and businessman Pavel Antov found lying in a pool of his blood outside a hotel in eastern India just days after his friend had died at the same hotel. The friend had died of a heart attack. Now this is an interesting character and it's

interesting to look at just how corrupt, openly corrupt Russia is. This guy, Antov, was part of the Legislative Assembly from the Vladimir region. He founded a meat processing plant in that area, and he was ranked by Forbes Russia as the richest civil servant in Russia in 2019 with an income of, wait for it, $140 million. I mean, that's better than Fauci, at least better than what Fauci puts on his income tax returns. We don't know what he's being paid

completely. We don't know all the royalties and all the rest of the tax returns. We don't know what he's being paid completely. We don't know all the royalties and all the rest of the stuff. And we don't know what happens under the table either. But you know, Fauci, um, is paid more than the president. And again, I don't understand why people haven't talked about this.

Um, the salaries as pointed out to me by somebody who works for the government, said, look, everybody's salary is supposed to be capped in the administrative branch in the bureaucracy. It's supposed to be capped at the salary of the vice president, which is just over $200,000. The president gets paid $400,000. Fauci gets paid something like $420,000 or something. And he's going to get a pension based on that high amount. How does he get paid that? If you look at his bosses, right?

You know, the NIH is under a rather his, uh, NIA ideas under the NIH. The NIH is under HHS and both the head of NIH and the head of HHS, his boss and his grand boss, if you will, they both get that $200,000 salary that's equivalent to the vice president. So how does Fauci skip all that stuff? Interesting. But it pales in comparison to the corruption in Russia, where this guy that was just defenestrated made $140 million. The fact that he fell out of a hotel window sparked concerns of foul play, since other opponents of Putin have died in a similar fashion.

Isn't that such a strange word, defenestration? You know? I mean, it, they go back. I looked that up because I said it to have a word specifically about throwing somebody out of a window. Now we do know that that is the CIA's preferred method as well, but it actually goes back. I looked, I thought this was interesting because I looked up the etymology of this thing goes back to 1618 in prague and you had a couple of catholic government officials thrown out by some radical protestants thrown out of a window that was three stories high they survived they landed in a trash heap

it survived but it was known as the defenestration of prague right and that's really where we get the uh you know it comes from the latin word for window that's where we get the term and it also underscores something else and i've talked about for the longest time one of the reasons why we don't want to merge religion with politics you know these these people were not either side of this. They were government officials, and the religious connections that they had were really just secondary to their power and seeing each other as part of a different club, just like Republican versus Democrat. And that really has become something of religion, hasn't it it in this country at this point? I mean, uh, you know, people on both sides of this, that has

become something of religion. And, uh, but it's really a religion that's really more based around their politics and their political power base. So that kicked off a 30 year war, but anyway, that's where defenestration comes from. And somebody who the people who like to practice it or the CIA and Putin, uh, who used to be part of the KGB. So, uh, this, um, multimillionaire who was making a multimillionaire puts it

lightly if he's getting a salary of $140 million a year, he's gotta be a billionaire. Um, he actually was a member of a pro Putin party and he had been on a trip to celebrate his 66th birthday. A male friend of his party had died from a heart attack on Thursday last week. And, uh, then this guy died two days later, uh, being, uh, you know, falling out of a window. Now, uh, the Russian foreign ministry says, uh, we think that he fell out of the window because he was so distraught about the death of his friend.

He just fell out. Um, and so, uh, yeah, that's, uh, not likely, but he'd, he'd, uh, criticized, uh, even though he was in Putin's the pro Putin party that supported Putin, he broke with a Putin and the party last summer in June. This guy criticized the war and airstrikes in Kiev as Russian quote, terror wounding Ukrainian civilians. He highlighted a Russian missile strike. He said a girl has been pulled out from underneath the rubble.

The girl's father appears to have died. The mother is trying to be pulled out with a crane. She is trapped under a slab. To tell the truth, it's extremely difficult to call this anything other than terror, he said at the time. But he quickly got a message. He better walk this back. And he did. He made a groveling apology on a social media, an about term, claimed that his previous, and started making all kinds of, uh,

nasty remarks about the queen, which we know that peers Morgan would never do. So he should have thought of that excuse. I wasn't drunk tweeting. Uh, somebody hacked my account. He insisted in this groveling apology that he always supported the president and sincerely backed the goals of Putin's military operation. But local journalists disputed that. So there's a group of these guys, four of them, traveled to India, they said, to celebrate his birthday.

And now, like Agatha Christie novel, they're down to two. We'll see what happens to the other guys in the next couple of days. Who knows what will happen? But so the question is, is Putin Satan or is he Santa? Because, you know, I was going to talk about this on Monday. This propaganda film that was put together, Putin Clause, I guess you could call it, it highlights the LGBT delusion that the West is operating under. And the fact that military leaders in the U S and Britain, as well as, uh, intelligence,

uh, and other government officials have said, the reason that we're fighting is because of LGBT, this encapsulates this. And so the lines have been drawn, you know, Putin has drawn the lines years ago against the, um, uh, the homosexual marriage and the rest of this stuff. Whereas we have, uh, radically embraced everything going down to transgenderism. So in this video, it depicts a Santa Claus coming in and helping a little boy who is suffering under this LGBT situation.

They show pictures of his parents, parent one and two, two men, and all the rest of this stuff. And Santa comes in and magically changes all this. Here is the video, and I'll narrate some of this as it's happening for the people who are listening. So they're showing LGBT plus books there on the shelf. The kid is dressed in pink. He's drawing and dreaming of a mom and a dad

with him. I hear something. Oh, and there's two guys together labeled Parent 1 and Parent 2. This is all in English. LGBTQ+, straight to gay are the books that are on the shelf. The little boy's got a necklace here. He's not evidently happy with it.

Dressed in pink, wearing a necklace. Now he puts his letter that he was writing to Santa Claus in the stocking. And now wind has blown out the candles. He's now laying down and praying before he turns in. Now here comes Santa Claus and he's got some gifts for him. Oh, they're playing Tchaikovsky.

What's going on? Stop the Russian music. Giving him real toys. Soccer ball, other things. Shows a crucifix of Christ put on the wall. Look at this. The parent one, parent two guys have been changed to a mother and father. Oh. And he turns around and he's fixed everything.

The boy's discovering all this. And he pulls down the mask to show an actor that looks kind of like Putin. So that's the propaganda film that everybody is so upset about. Dear Santa, thank you and Merry Christmas. Well, do you remember when Celine Dion did a video a few years ago? She degendered the babies. She's dressed all in black. She goes into a nursery where the babies are separated pink and blue and she does her magic

thing and all of that disappears and there's like these uh black um uh dragons and things like that that you freeze it you you see that they're actually dragons but it's a bunch of stuff that goes up like glitter and all that of course uh that didn't create the kind of pushback with all that satanic imagery and degendering. And of course that was a bit before this transgender stuff took off. Uh, but, um,

again, the lines have clearly been drawn and it is kind of interesting which side we're on. We have taken, um, uh, they understand what their strength is in terms of propaganda. Uh, so, um, that is, um, uh, they understand what their strength is in terms of propaganda.

So that is Vladimir Putin's Christmas propaganda. Let's talk a little bit before we take a break here, though, about the reality. Going back to this, we see that not only is Lindsey Graham pushing to verify their, what they believe and, uh, pretty much know, uh, that, uh, they're going to try to tear Russia apart, break it up. That's again, that's the reason why Kissinger wrote that op-ed piece saying this is a bad idea. Uh, even Kissinger understands that's a bad idea. The CIA is directly, uh, involved in sabotage attacks inside Russian territory. This is coming from a guy who is now a journalist. He was formerly a special forces

soldier. The CIA has been, this is on antiwar.com initially. Zero Hedge also has it. CIA has been using the European NATO countries intelligence services to conduct sabotage attacks inside Russia since the February invasion of Ukraine, says investigative journalist Jack Murphy. He cited unnamed former U.S. intelligence and military officials. Reports said that no U.S. personnel are on the ground in Russia, but the operations are being directed by the CIA. The U.S. is using an ally's intelligence service to add an extra layer of plausible deniability. And of course, this was talked about a great deal when you had those attacks on Russian ships in the Black Sea, saying, you know, they give the weapons to them and they tell them where to aim them.

But of course, we're not doing the attack, right? The report appeared on Murphy's personal website. And in a note at the end of the piece, he explained why it wasn't published by a media outlet. He said, while working with editors at mainstream publications, I was asked to do things that were illegal and unethical in one instance. And in another instance, I felt that a senior CIA official was able to edit

my article by making off the record statements before they leaked a story to the new york times to undermine this piece according to the report the covert campaign inside russia has been years in the making two former military officials said that the NATO country's spy services, listen to this, had hidden a cache of explosives and equipment in Russia more than a decade ago, and some of the gear has been used recently. This is just like Operation Gladio. That was also run by NATO. But of course, that was back in the 1960s that they put a bunch of weapons in Europe as part of Operation Gladio.

And 10 years later, you had false flag terrorist attacks. You had the communists in Italy were winning elections. Aldo Moro was elected as president or prime minister. I forget which title they use there. And so you had all of these communist attacks, even though the communists were winning elections, you had radical communists start attacking people. Well, it was a false flag attack by NATO.

Lyman Limitzer, who was head of NATO and put the weapons in place, and ostensibly the purpose of the weapons were supposed to be that if there was a conflict between NATO and Russia, they wanted to have weapons in place to arm a guerrilla counterattack if Russia was able to occupy Italy, but in reality, what they did was they use the, this cache of NATO weapons to run false flag attacks, posing as communist. They eventually, uh, captured,

kidnapped, uh, Aldo Moro. And that's where Steve Pachinik got involved with, uh, Kissinger sending him over to negotiate. And he was accused in an investigation later in Italy of having ordered the execution of Aldo Mora because Aldo Mora figured out that this thing was a false

flag. And so Italy and their investigation pointed out that this was the assassination of Aldo Mora, that it was a false flag NATO event. And, you know, further background, the guy who was running this thing, his head of NATO, Lyman Limitzer, had been the chief of staff that was fired by JFK before he was assassinated. He was fired because he was plotting Operation Northwoods. They wanted to go to war with Cuba. And Operation Northwoods, if you remember, was an idea to fly commercial airliners into buildings and blame it on Cuba so they could go to war with Cuba.

They were also going to attack U.S. military operations and kill U.S. military personnel in order to get their war with Cuba. They were going to stage these types of false flag attacks. So the guy behind operation Northwoods was fired, sent to Europe, became NATO commander, ran this operation Gladio. And now we see that,

uh, NATO countries were putting explosives and equipment in Russia more than a decade ago. And now they have pulled them out and the CIA is directing them. A former U.S. special ops official and U.S. person briefed on the campaign said the CIA did not get involved with the NATO country's operations inside Russia until 2014. What happened in 2014? Well, that's when this war really began.

That's when the war really began. That's when the Obama administration staged the coup and, um, you know, uh, said we are going to break off from Russia and then Crimea and the Donbass area said, no, we want to stay with Russia. And then they started attacking, uh, with, um, bombs and everything. They've been at war for the entire time since 2014. And that's as the Obama administration is pushing through that coup, they started positioning weapons inside Russia at the same time. Yeah, Russia knows exactly what's going on. We all know that this is NATO targeting Russia. That's what the coup is ultimately about.

And that's where it is heading right now. Lindsey Graham is just saying the quiet part out loud. The sabotage operations the CIA is currently overseeing require a presidential finding. Obama signed a finding before he left office that allowed for covert action against Russia over allegations that Moscow interfered in the 2016 election, which has never been proven.

They have absolutely no evidence of that. So they say they killed two birds with one stone. They attacked Trump by saying Russia interfered in the election. And then at the same time, because we say Russia interfered in the election, we're now going to get involved with this Operation Gladio type of thing inside of Russia. According to the Washington Post, Obama's finding allows, quote, planting of cyber weapons in Russia's infrastructure. The digital equivalent of bombs that could be detonated

if the U.S. found itself in an escalating exchange with Moscow. By the way, it was also a very concerning thing when the Obama administration said, we are going to consider any alleged cyber attack against us as the same as if a bomb had been launched against us. So we're going to treat a cyber attack the same as if it were a kinetic physical attack, and that's very concerning because we all know that you can't tell where this is coming from. The CIA has a program to disguise themselves, to make it look like they are Russian or Chinese or North Korean or Iranian or whatever it was called. Vault seven.

Uh, that was exposed by WikiLeaks who put the manual out there and then other people put the code out there. And then eventually WikiLeaks published the code, the vault seven code. They could disguise it with all of the hallmarks that are used to try to determine country of origin. And so they have it. Other countries have it. Uh, there's no way that you can tell where any of this stuff is coming from that is an illusion but if you make the accusation well look you know

and we saw this type of thing being said at the time at the time that was one of the things they were trying to um assert was proof that russians had interfer They said, look, this stuff is coming from Russia. And, uh, I interviewed at that time, um, both, uh, William Benny, who was the global technical head of the NSA for a very long time and, uh, John McAfee. And they both pointed out, they said, look, uh, you know, you, you can look like anybody you want to. And that was before we had vault seven vault seven, then came along after that, verified exactly what we all knew from common sense and from testimony of people who had experience in cybersecurity.

Anyway, a CIA spokesperson denied these allegations, but as the journalist, uh, Murphy pointed out, the spy agency can legally deny the existence of its covert operations without any blowback. Murphy said that he published the story to inform the public. He said, yes, indeed, the Russian government knows perfectly well who is sponsoring these sabotage strikes. Moreover, the intelligence community wants them to know. They want them to know. They want them to know. The only party that is left in the dark

is the general public at large. Left unaware of the shadow war that is taking place behind the scenes. He said his article went through a rigorous and vigorous fact-checking process was deemed newsworthy, as newsworthy as the strategic bombing of Laos and Cambodia or the CIA's secret drone campaign in

Pakistan. Jack Murphy is a special forces combat veteran turned journalist who specializes in reporting on clandestine, uh, situations. Now, let me just pause for a second. I'm not going to read this because this is a very,

very long report, but I would suggest that you read it. This goes back to 1979 and the name of the report is Charlottesville, a fictional account of a nuclear attack. And you'll find this at nps.gov. But the title of the article is Charlottesville, a fictional account of a nuclear attack. And the preface to this report, which again,

runs about 30 pages. It'd take me a very long time to go through all of the details of this. In 1979, the U S Senate commissioned a study on the effects of nuclear war. They wanted to know what would happen to government, to the economy, and to society. Notice the order of importance there, right? The first thing they're concerned about is the government. That's why we've had books written like Raven Rock, the plan to save the government and

let the rest of us die. Continuity of government is the only thing they care about. And then next to that, the economy. And then if we think about it, maybe, you know, society. If nuclear war were to break out between USSR and the United States, this is 1979 before the fall of the Soviet Union, what would the country be like afterwards? The result was a study from the Office of Technical Assessment.

It was titled The Effects of Nuclear War. It outlined the specific effects of various attack scenarios. They determined things like kill rates, illness levels, effects on food supply, etc., tucked among technical reports that imagined the bombings of Detroit and Leningrad, as well as discussions of various attack cases and long-term effects, is a 15-page fictional narrative that imagines life after the war in one specific city, Charlottesville. The fictional account was intended in an effort to provide a more concrete understanding of the situation which survivors of a nuclear war would face. And so I'll just read to you just the beginning of it.

At first it seemed like a miracle no fireball had seared Charlottesville, no blast had crumbled buildings or buried inhabitants. No dark mushroom cloud had spread over the sky. Much of the country had been devastated by a massive nuclear attack, but the small, gracious city of Charlottesville, Virginia, had escaped unharmed. The nuclear attack on the nation did not come as a complete surprise. For some weeks, there'd been mounting anxiety as the media reported deteriorating relations between superpowers but with the concurrence of his advisors the president decided that an evacuation call from the federal government would be premature possibly provocative there was no hard evidence that soviets were evacuating and there was a good

chance that the crisis would pass. Spontaneous evacuation without official sanction or direction grew and spread, however, and a week before the attack, Charlottesville had no free hotel or motel rooms. He goes on to talk about the fact that a lot of people were fleeing from the Washington, D.C. area. They talk about the fact that, you know, as the attack does finally happen, most did not see the attacks that hit Washington and Richmond as they huddled in their shelters, but the sky to the east and the north of Charlottesville

glowed brilliant in the noonday sun. At first, no one knew how extensive the damage was. Communication nationwide was interrupted. Each town, city, village, or farm was an island, forced to suffer its selected fate of death or salvation alone. Sometime later, it was learned that more than 4,000 megatons had destroyed military and industrial targets, killing close to 100 million people in the U.S. The U.S. counterattack on the Soviet Union had a similar devastating effect. Then they had to deal with the radiation survivors. They said, starting at a moderate level of about 40 rems an hour, a cumulative dose of 450 rems received in a one-week period would be fatal to half of those exposed.

The intensity rose to 50 rems before starting the decline to a level of about four-tenths of a rem an hour after two weeks. The total dose in the first four days was 2,000 rems, which killed those who refused to believe that shelter was necessary and increase the risk of eventually dying of cancer for those who were even properly sheltered. You see, this is what Lindsey Graham is playing with. This is what the Pentagon is playing with.

I don't know about you, but I have absolutely no patience for the games that are being played by the CIA, by Lindsey Graham, the rest of these people. Because as you read through this, you know, the president is saved. He's taken away. Lindsey Graham believes that he's going to be part of that insider group and probably right about that. It gets taken to a deep underground base with Dr. Strangelove and all the babes and all the rest of this stuff that he's fantasized. Maybe not babes,

you know, a lot of men in uniform for Lindsey Graham. Anyway, these are the people who are playing with our lives. They're playing with our lives. Depopulation of vaccines, CBDC to control everything we do a war to keep us from stopping them doing this stuff.

At the very end of the report, uh, one of the participants as they're getting together, trying to figure out what is the way forward. You know, they deal with starvation. They deal with violence, people turning eyes,

fighting in the streets and, you know, different groups are fighting over food and all the rest of this stuff. Absolute hell on earth. One of the participants who had written a major study of the post-attack recovery some years before had said, we have to be able to produce new goods and materials before we exhaust our storage supplies. We can continue to eat the wheat that is in the grain elevators in the Midwest for another year, perhaps. But after that, we have to have the capacity to grow new wheat.

When our winter coats wear through, we have to have the capacity to weave cloth for new ones. When our railroad cars break down, we have to be able to make new ones or replacement parts. Right now, we're a long way from that capability. Privately, he and a group of conferees agreed that the heavy controls the economy, when the economy and ultimately on the population, would be the only way to get things going. So we're going to have to put you under heavy controls and restrictions. This is what

they always wanted, isn't it? And we live in a society, this was done in 1979, imagining all the different things and how CB radio was going to be one of the key ways they're going to be able to talk to each other we have much more vulnerable complicated infrastructure right now since 1979 so much of our manufacturing capacities moved offshore to china other places how would we be able to pull any of that back? Even in 1979, they said some saw the nation building itself along the lines of some of the Asian nations. These are the more optimistic people, which boasted a small technologically advanced segment in the midst of a large agrarian or unskilled worker population along the lines of India or Indonesia in 1979.

Some thought technology itself would eventually disappear from American society. If you don't have computers to run, you don't train computer programmers, one expert was overheard to say. And after a while and a few generations, nobody remembers how the machines worked at all. Not just computers. What machines could we actually Still be able to build today We don't even have They've stretched out our supply lines

Across the globe so much That everybody's going to be In this type of situation Not just Americans They remember the important things How to plant crops How to train draft horses and oxen How to make a simple pump

We will have survived biologically some, but our way of life is going to be unrecognizable. In several generations, the U.S. is going to resemble a late medieval society. Well, I think that that is what's going to happen to us anyway. If we're going to survive what they're planning to do with the economic disruption and who knows what else they want to do. They're working on putting us in a medieval society. At least those of us who are not in the, you know, they talk about, well,

we might have these islands of cities, technologically sophisticated, surrounded by an agrarian society where people are just kind of surviving. That's what they're planning. That's what they've been planning with Agenda 21, with the UN 2030 agenda for a long time. I want to end with something that is more optimistic, though. And that is, before we go to break, this is an op-ed piece about a true story, something that happened during World War II. We all talk about the beginning of World War I and how you had the spontaneous truce that broke out between German soldiers and Allied soldiers for Christmas.

But this is a smaller story of World War II. German soldiers and Allied soldiers for Christmas. But this is a smaller story of World War II. Fritz Wittgen, who was 12 years old and living with his mother, Elizabeth, in a small hunting cabin in the Ardern Forest during the worst fighting of the Battle of the Bulge. His father had hidden them in a secluded mountain hut across the Belgian border after the family's bakery and home were destroyed during Allied bombing. While Fritz's dad baked bread for German soldiers, he and his mother had little food

except for what they could find foraging. On a freezing Christmas Eve night, they struggled to ignore distant gunfire and prepared a meager meal made out of scrawny rooster and some potatoes. There was a loud knock at the door. Fritz's heart leapt, believing that it was his father finally returning. Instead, it was three Americans from the 121st Infantry, all suffering from frostbite, one seriously injured. My mother knew the penalty for harboring the enemy, he says, but when she looked in the

young American's eyes and saw that one was badly hurt, she opened the door and let them in. They added some potatoes to the stew for their tired, hungry guests and attended to the American's gunshot wound the best they could. And because the soldiers spoke no German and they spoke no English, they relied on hand signals and on broken French to communicate. Then came some more pounding from outside. When the mother, Elizabeth, cautiously opened the hut's door,

she found four freezing Wehrmacht soldiers looking for shelter. Fritz, again the 12-year-old year old boy said i was almost paralyzed with fear for though i was a child i knew that harsh law of war that anyone giving aid and comfort to the enemy would be shot had any other person opened the door on that frigid christmas eve night in 1944 the killing fields would almost certainly have claimed more victims. Instead, she took control of the situation, wishing the young Germans fröhlich Weihnachten, I guess, Merry Christmas, is that what that is? Inviting them in for food and rest on two conditions, that they leave their weapons outside and that they respect her Christmas guests. She reminded them that it was Christmas Eve and told them sternly that there would be

no shooting around here. While Fritz stood and stared in disbelief, the soldiers complied. She then ran back to the Americans who had grown nervous, spoke gently in a language they could not understand, and grabbed their weapons too. At first, the tiny cabin was uncomfortably tense. Then one of the Germans, who had been a medical student, offered to assist the wounded American, noticeably weak from blood loss. The Americans pulled out some coffee grounds and cigarettes from a tattered pack, and one of the other Germans offered some scraps of bread, and Fritz added what few ingredients they had to the stew. And his mother read from the Bible and declared that there would be at least one night of peace in this war. So she says, come, Herr Jesus, she prayed, and be our guest. Her son remembers.

There were tears in her eyes. And as I looked around the table, I saw the battle-weary soldiers, filled with emotion. After dinner, the seven soldiers, who'd been bitter enemies just hours before fell into deep sleep side by side. And when they woke the next morning, they exchanged Christmas greetings and set to work building a makeshift stretcher from tree branches for the wounded American. The Germans advised the Americans to avoid a town that had been taken over by Nazi forces and to give them a map and a compass that would get them back to their friends. So for Fritz, his mother had been nothing short of a hero.

The inner strength of a single woman who, by her wits and intuition, prevented potential bloodshed taught me the practical meanings, meaning of the word, goodwill toward mankind. He and his parents survived the war. Eventually they immigrated to the United States. He became an American citizen. He wound up opening a German bakery of his own in Honolulu, Hawaii. After telling his story to his new countrymen for years, he eventually submitted details

to the Reader's Digest, a much larger audience learned of the rare piece. And in 1985, President Reagan talked about it and urged others to do the same. So one of the soldiers eventually got a hold of him and told Fritz, he said, your mother saved my life. And with that comfort, the young boy turned to the old man and said, now I can die in peace. My mother's courage will not be forgotten. His mother often said over the years until her own passing,

God was at her table. Percy wrote this, that whenever I think of Fritz's story, I am struck by a remarkable truth. It is always the smallest of acts that end up creating ripples large enough to produce meaningful change. Faith and small acts of courage do change the world. If we're going to stop this, it is going to be on that kind of a level. We don't realize the power we have. We don't realize the power that we have to change things as individuals and especially as Christians

in terms of the mighty weapons that we have. And we better get busy because if we allow this world and these murders these mass murders on both sides to continue down this path of geopolitical calculations and pragmatism we're going to wind up in the kind of frightening scenario that is mentioned in Charlottesville. And even if we don't have a nuclear war, we're going to wind up in the hell on earth prison planet that has been designed for us by the World Economic Forum and others. Stay with us. We'll be right back. This is The David Knight Show.

I want to thank some of the people who left tips. Geesebusters, Geesebusters, thank you very much for the tip. Happy New Year's to you. And again, this is probably a busy time of year for him, trying to get the geese to move on to another location. It's pretty busy right now. Uh, Angus Mustang. Thank you very much.

I really hope 2023 is way better than 2021 and 22. Well, let's, um, let's pray about that. Yeah. Uh, Eric, thank you very much for the tip. That's very kind and generous. I appreciate that. One of the interesting things I think that has come out is the fact that the biden white house pushed directly for the removal of alex berenson and as i pointed out this is something that we've

seen for the longest time the um uh the understanding that these people who are doing the censoring are um really out of control and we understand who they're allied with as well right there's there's new uh reports coming up based on uh this dump number nine of the or report number nine of the twitter files we nine of the Twitter files, we see that the Biden administration is very, very angry that more was not being done to censor the COVID narrative. But we also see now Jordan Schlechtel has a report looking at the world economic forum.

You know, they meet in January in Davos every January, except, you know, when this pandemic nonsense is going around. And so they're meeting is coming up and they have on their website, they're talking about how to follow and contact, you know, follow what's going on and contact each other and all the rest of the stuff. And they mentioned pretty much all of the social media platforms, except Twitter, except Twitter. They don't like free speech. And they're also steering people to specifically to the Chinese social media outlets.

Do you understand how these people have been partners? You know, going back to 2015, as I pointed out, the world economic forum and the UN announced that they had a partnership. They announced again in 2019 that they had, um, were moving together in additional ways, deepening the partnership in 2015, when they initially announced their partnership, they said that, um, that that was when both organizations started talking about 2030. That's when the UN changed from agenda 21 to UN 2030.

That's when the world economic Forum started talking about smart cities and 2030 and all the rest of the stuff, saying that you'll own nothing, but you'll be happier. We'll do drone deliveries of what we think you need and all the rest of this stuff. And so now the World Economic Forum cancels Twitter, directs followers to Chinese social media apps because they're close allies.

We've seen the World Economic Forum and the UN. Now we see China. We understand the other people who don't like to have free speech even talked about anywhere. That'd be the EU leadership, the FBI, the deep state, the deputized state of Silicon Valley big tech companies, the media, all of them together. All of them together.

Prior to its upcoming conference in Davos next month, the World Economic Forum appears to have joined the cancel campaign against Twitter, taking to recommending Chinese state-controlled social media apps to follow along with Davos Man into the future. World Economic Forum recommends following along with a handful of social media sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, WeChat, and Weibo. Or Weibo, I guess. Twitter is no longer included on their lists. Davos recently revealed that their China office now has 40 full-time staffers.

World Economic Forum is pretty big. Every year in Beijing, the World Economic Forum hosts its annual meeting of new champions, they say. That's what they call it. That is to facilitate partnerships between international businesses and the Chinese Communist Party. And in 2018, the Chinese Communist Party awarded Klaus Schwab, head of Davos, they gave him their China Reform Friendship Medal. This is for non-Chinese people who do the CCP's bidding overseas. Yeah.

It's a conspiracy. Uh, you can look at the top levels of government of technology of media and every country, but especially here, uh, and, um,

you know, the Chinese communists part of that as well. It's all the same group. Davos 2023 will feature the CEO of TikTok on stage as they try to attack Elon Musk. And you know there was, I forget who it was that said that. Karen read it to me. She said, look at this. You know, they had some person saying, thank you, Elon Musk, for spending, you know, 44, $45 billion to free our speech again. I don't know.

I think the most charitable way that I could look at what Elon Musk is doing is that he just stumbled into this. I don't buy the idea of philanthropist billionaires. They're into it for some reason, right? They want more money. They want more power behind everything that they do. But you could say that, you know, for whatever reason, he got Twitter and he just kind of stumbled into this thing inadvertently. And now he finds himself at war with everybody over this. A more cynical view would be that he's making a bigger play deliberately and that he is going to be the leader that people trust

so these people control both sides of it. That has always been their tactic. As I've said before, talking about the trust, the Bolshevik Revolution, which these people are all Marxists. In the Bolshevik Revolution, you had Felix Dzerzhinsky and the Cheka, the forerunner of the KGB. They set up organizations abroad, funded those organizations, raised money from people who wanted to have opposition

to the Bolsheviks in Russia. So it was actually the KGB forerunner that was running all of these different organizations so they could, first of all, grab the money, but secondly, so they would know who their opposition was. The people would come there. They would talk about what they were going to do to take Russia back away from the Marxists, but the Marxists were the ones who were running that trust,

and again, they were able to lure in and trap the guy that Ian Fleming based James Bond off of Sigmund Riley, who was most people felt the most successful spy that the British had. I mean, he'd been able, he spoke multiple languages. He'd been able to infiltrate himself in the German high command in the middle of a world war one get secret plans. So he's very heavily involved with the military industrial complex with the, um, the British efforts to gain control of oil as it was being

discovered in the middle East. I mean, he'd had an amazing career, but they were able to trap him. And quite frankly, you know, when I look at the actions of, and I know the background of Elon Musk, I just do not trust him on this. He is at war with all the rest of the people, just like Trump was. And because of that, people believe that they can, these guys are on our side, they're going to do things to help us, and that absolutely is not true.

Not true of Trump. And I don't think it's true of a Musk either. So, uh, it should come as no surprise that the ruling class's favorite narrative and ideas shop for technocratic tyranny has come after Twitter gone to war with Twitter. Uh,

I, I, again, I refuse to, um, see this on the face value that somehow, uh, you savior, an accidental savior, a true altruistic billionaire who has come to our rescue, you know, just like Donald Trump did. No, I'm sorry. Don't buy it.

The Biden administration, again, as I said, was outraged that even more Americans were not censored over this. And this latest batch of Twitter files, a memo said the Biden team was not satisfied with Twitter's enforcement approach as they wanted Twitter to do more and to de-platform several accounts. Because of this dissatisfaction, we were asked to join several other calls, and they were very angry in nature, said a 2022 summary of meetings with the White House by Lauren Culbertson, Twitter's head of U.S. public policy. The report was documented as part of these Twitter files were released that were reported by Zweg. They said Twitter did not fully capitulate to the wishes of the Biden administration. Twitter actually showed more care about moderation than was shown by the government towards free speech. But understand that they're operating as deputies.

They're the deputies of the deputized actors of the deep state. And when you look at what I talked about yesterday, the fact that the CIA is mentioned there as other government agencies, and of course it's not just the CIA, it's the entire intelligence community, but they are banned from spying on Americans. So they have to do this with plausible deniability. So these other government agencies, the CIA and others, contact the FBI that can work on law enforcement domestically

and tell them what they want. That gives the CIA and these other government agencies plausible deniability. Then the FBI contacts Twitter and says, well, you know, as a government, we can't tell you who to censor because of the First Amendment, that type of thing. But, you know, this is what we'd like to have. And so Twitter does it, and it gives the FBI plausible deniability.

It's a chain of lies, a chain of deniability for the deputized state. The social media company before Musk bought it did, however, suppress views that conflicted with the official positions of the White House, said the report. The report cited as part of the problem that Twitter contracted with outsiders with no medical or scientific background. They were tasked with moderating comments from scientists who were experts in their fields. This is why you see so many experts, uh, kicked off. And it's like, what?

You know, I epidemiologists, cardiologists, all the rest kicked off by some teenager at Twitter. So, uh, the reporter is why who went through these, um, uh, these, uh, files said inevitably dissent yet legitimate content was labeled as misinformation. The accounts of doctors and others were suspended both for tweeting opinions and demonstrably true information. Well, we've all known that we've seen that for a while, but now they have the documents. And I guess, you know, the one thing that comes out of it is that, you know, even reason

I haven't seen anything from a heritage foundation or Cato Institute, cause I don't read their publications, but even reason now has dropped the line. Well, you know, Twitter's a private company and they can do whatever they want to. They understand. I think now that they were simply the beard for government censorship. Uh, last week, this was on the Babylon B government warrants. So with Elon Musk owning Twitter, they will only control 97% of the media. We can't overstate how dangerous this is. Yes, we still control Facebook, Google, Apple, Instagram, YouTube, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC,

the Washington Post, the New York times hollywood time usa today the wall street journal and pretty much all the rest but we don't control twitter and this is dangerous for democracy the entire intelligence community the cia fbi and nsa concurred with the warning stating that elon's ownership of twitter leaves america vulnerable to dangerous opinions that we do not approve of. Well, that pretty much sums it up, doesn't it? Uh,

we have seen 128% increase in opinions that we do not approve of. You have a Devin Nunes. You remember Devin Nunes, 2015, 2019, he was involved in, um, you know,

fighting against this Russian collusion lie. He subpoenaed the Department of Justice and the FBI for documents related to their involvement with the Russian collusion hoax when he was congressman. This is a story from Epoch Times. And he was chair of the House Intelligence Committee. In response, he says, the Department of Justice engaged in reverse spying to try and stop the investigation. They were looking for ways to blackmail him and the staff who worked for him who were all cleared and had been previously investigated, you know, for intelligence clearance. Now, one of the things that I think been previously investigated, you know, for intelligence clearance.

Now, one of the things that I think is interesting that, of course, the Epoch Times isn't going to point out is that when this happened in 2015 to 2019, guess who was president during that time? At least during the last couple of years. 2015 was Obama. But this continued. It didn't change. Nothing stopped. And so even though he is asking questions about the, um, even though he's asking questions about the Russian collusion, everything, the department of justice, which in the latter

part of it was under who Jeff sessions, who was under Trump, nothing changed with any of that. And when you look at what he says they were doing, he says they were trying to suppress the investigation. The FBI and the Department of Justice was purposely trying to find blackmail to use against him and his staff. This goes back to the very beginning of the FBI. This is what the FBI was always about.

Nixon talked about it. Truman talked about it. Said J. Edgar Hoover's got these files to blackmail everybody. When J. Edgar Hoover died, his secretary went in and started destroying records of blackmail stuff that he had set up to blackmail everybody. Truman said he's got files on everybody in Washington. They just didn't find anything on Nunes and his, uh, his, uh, staff. But this is the very reason why the, uh, you know, people like, um, uh, you know, I can't remember the guy's name now.

The, uh, the guy that was, uh, was Speaker of the House for the Republicans for the longest amount of time, he was handpicked as a known pedophile and moved up to be Speaker of the House and stayed there for the longest time. And they pick people that they know they can blackmail, and they try to get blackmail information on everybody. He says at the time nobody knew publicly. He said we knew. The FBI and the time, nobody knew publicly. He said, we knew. The FBI and the Department of Justice knew that we knew.

They knew that they were under investigation by the team. So what did they do? They target my lawyers. So we can try to figure out what we knew, when we knew it, what we were going to do with the information. They tried to blackmail us. And again, this is from day one, Jager Hoover's tactics. It wasn't like they were in search of some crime.

What they were really after was intelligence and potentially blackmail to figure out how they could stop the investigation. If the DOJ was acting in compliance with the law, it should have informed Nunes when it demanded Google turn over personal email and phone data from at least two senior intelligence members of his team. He said, look, it's a serious issue. If I've got staff that work for me that are handling the nation's highest secrets, if I have staff that are somehow doing something wrong, the Department of Justice should have come to me and told me. But again, this is happening, you know, initiated under Obama, continued under Trump, continued under Jeff Sessions. Nunes said the only way for the Department of Justice to get around that requirement is to use the National Security Division and essentially accuse Nunes and his team of being agents of Putin. The only two logical reasons he said they would get subpoenas against his staff were

that they were there to grab intelligence on us as we were conducting our investigation and two, to look for anything that they could possibly do to find blackmail so we could stop this information from coming out and their involvement in uh, from, uh, uh, in this particular investigation. So it's not surprising that 63% of Americans want the FBI censorship of Twitter investigated. You have a Jim Jordan and Kevin McCarthy. Jim Jordan is saying, I support Kevin McCarthy for speaker of the house. And McCarthy is promising that they're going to do a Frank church type of hearing. And as I talked about that yesterday, I really do hope that they come up with something that

is more concrete, first of all, than the thing that Frank Church came up with. I think the first thing you need to do is get rid of the FBI. They were created as an organization of just raw political power, keeping blackmail files on everybody, as I pointed out, from the very beginning, that was the way J. Edgar Hoover operated. His name is still on the building. His tactics are still ingrained in the institution. Get rid of it.

We don't need a Federal Bureau of Investigation. Keep the lab or something or help the different states to have that, but you don't need to have that. There's no authority for that to be involved. Uh, so, uh, 63% of the people want that, uh, when investigation of what the FBI was doing in terms of directing censorship. And this again goes over both administrations, both Trump and Biden were doing this.

Only 22% opposed that another 15% don't know what's going on. FBI what's that, you know, the typical type of thing. So I said, we're looking at church style committee here and look at this again, that the CIA, that was what the church committee hearing was exactly about spying on Americans, but the CIA misdirected everybody into thinking that it was about foreign assassinations. That's the way they take over narratives.

And that's what we have to understand about. And of course, then they also took over the legislation that was supposed to keep them in line. They use the FISA, the foreign intelligence surveillance act and the FISA court. They used those things to give them plausible deniability in the same way. You've got this chain of deniability going from the CIA and the NSA to the FBI, from the FBI to Twitter. They also created, they used, wound up using the very structures that were put in after the church committee hearing to stop spying on Americans. They use that to spy on Americans and say, well, we got authority from the Pfizer court to do this, to spy on Mr.

And Mrs. Verizon. They're not going to change this. They're not going to undo the Pfizer thing. They're not going to, uh, undo the FBI. They're not going to make any real reforms. This is going to be a lot of airing of dirty laundry at the most, but most of the stuff is going to be covered up.

Meanwhile, you have a Richard Levine, the guy who calls himself Rachel and wears a dress is saying, we need to have more big tech censorship. We need a cleaner information environment. That's his terms for trans. Uh, again, uh, this guy, Richard Levine, his assistant secretary at HHS, they also gave him the rank of admiral and the commission core of the U.S. Public Health Service. Is that something, you know, people talk about, oh, look, you know, we've got this tranny guy as an admiral. Did you ever ask the question, Cause I've mentioned this many times.

I mentioned it a lot at the beginning. I said, do you notice how the CDC and all these people, the pictures of them, they're all in uniform, part of the commission core of the U S public health service. This is one of the things that the conservatives are missing. Why is it that we have these public health dictators wearing military

uniforms and have been wearing them for quite some time? I mean, we just experienced medical martial law for the last, uh, 1,021 days, essentially. They kind of telegraphed this by wearing their uniforms all the time. Uh,

I always thought that was odd, but, uh, you know, it made a lot of sense when you have operation warp speed, a depopulation program, uh, that's being applied against us. Uh, we're going to take a quick break.

And when we come back, um, we're going to talk about, uh, uh, the Santos clause, some interesting things in that and some interesting consequences of this guy who lied about everything. He said, I'm going to tell my story later. Well, it's interesting to hear what he has to say. Before we go, thank you very much, Nick Ellenbecker. Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. We'll be right back, folks.

Stay with us. Thank you. Субтитры создавал DimaTorzok Okay, and we're back a little bit sooner than I thought. But we have New York Congressman-elect George Santos. He's absolutely unrepentant, and he's still not going to tell the truth about anything. He admits to being a total liar, as the headline from Zero Hedge. But actually, he's still telling more lies. This guy could get a gig replacing the liar on Saturday Night Live. After a week of total silence, he is now admitted to a laundry list of lies, ranging from his education, his professional background, his property ownership, his religion.

I would also add his sexual preferences, his ethnicity, all the rest of it. He's lied about everything on his CV. He says, my sins here are embellishing my resume. No, he didn't embellish his resume. He lied about every single detail of it. He lied about graduating from college. He lied, claimed that he worked for Citigroup in Goldman Sachs. He said his family owned a real estate portfolio of 13 properties.

But then he admitted, one thing that he did admit is, well, I'm not a landlord, but everybody knew that. And then he said he was Jewish. Listen to what he said. I never claimed to be Jewish. I'm Catholic. Because I learned that my maternal family had a Jewish background. I said, I was Jew ish.

It's kind of like a Jew, but I wasn't Jewish. That's the most amazing thing. Uh, and then he gets outed for being a heterosexual when he wanted everybody to see him as homosexual, because that was the matchup for the first time of two openly homosexual people running for Congress. And he wanted to be one of them. He saw that to be his advantage. Well, you know, we've had Beto pretend to be Hispanic. Um, Robert Francis O'Rourke, the Irishman, uh, all he would put on the signs in

Texas was Beto. Yeah, I think I'm Hispanic, therefore I am Hispanic. But of course, he's still lying because he said, because I learned that my maternal family had a Jewish background. He had said that his maternal grandparents had fled the Nazis, the, uh, the Nazis and, uh, gotten to Brazil, but, uh, people looked it up and said, no, the family has been there for a very long time. There is no, uh, no, there is no Jewish heritage in his mother's side of the family, and they've been there for several generations and Brazil before

his parents immigrated to the U S he was born in the U S, but his parents were from Brazil. Every he's still lying about everything. Uh, so he said, I dated, he acknowledged owing thousands of dollars in unpaid rent. And despite being openly gay, he had a year's long marriage that he never revealed to a woman. Oh, so ashamed. They found out that I'm married to a woman. Oh, so ashamed. They found out that I'm married to a woman. He says, I dated women in the past.

I married a woman. It's a person. It's personal stuff. Talk to me about that. He acknowledged that a string of financial difficulties had left him owing thousands of dollars to landlords and creditors. You know, he was not a property owner who was wronged by moratoriums on evictions. He was, in fact, somebody that landlords had tried to evict multiple times for not paying the rent.

But this is the thing that I think is interesting, and this is the thing that I think may be his downfall. He failed to fully explain in the interviews, how his fortunes reversed so significantly, you know, from being somebody who couldn't pay his rent multiple times getting evicted. So if he's in a situation like that, where he can't even afford his rent, how was he able to lend his campaign? $700,000.

Where did that money come from? You know, he said on his FEC forums that he got the $700,000 from these companies that his family owned that don't exist. So where'd that $700,000 come from? And regardless, he's lied on the FEC forums about that. That's a serious matter when you're talking about the money, I think. So I don't know what's going to happen about that. He also firmly denied committing a crime anywhere in the world, even though the New York Times had

uncovered Brazilian court records showing that he had been charged with fraud as a young man. He was caught writing checks from a checkbook that he had stolen. He's not even a smart crook, obviously. He thinks he can still get away with this, even though people are doing deep dives as a background. He was stupid enough to think that he could run for public office and create this false persona, every bit of it false, and not get caught eventually. And like most criminals, he thinks he can still get away with this stuff. So he said, I never committed a crime anywhere in the world.

He says, I am not a criminal here. Not here or in Brazil or in any jurisdiction in the world. Absolutely not. That did not happen, he told new york post in an interview except court records show that he confessed to the crime and was charged the case was unable to move forward because authorities were unable to locate him he skipped out of the country santos also graduated said he graduated from Baruch College in 2010 before working for Citigroup, then going to Goldman Sachs, also included that he had a degree from New York University. None of that was true. The colleges, the campuses all told the New York Times they had no record of him. So he responds to this.

He says, I didn't graduate from any institution of higher learning i'm embarrassed and sorry for having embellished my resume we do stupid things in life again he didn't embellish it there's not a couple of incorrect details it's all false he admitted that he never worked directly for goldman sachs or city group he blamed a poor choice of words for creating the impression that he had worked for them. He's stupid enough that he doesn't realize that the Wayback Machine keeps track of websites. And on his website, he wrote, I began working at Citigroup as an associate and quickly

advanced to become an associate asset manager in the real asset division of the firm. That's pretty specific. It's not a poor choice of words that gave a false impression. While Santos could face ethics investigations once seated, legal experts say the House can only prevent candidates from taking office if they violate the constitution's age citizenship or state residency requirements. So that's why I wanted to go back and revisit this again.

Remember I said last week, um, that even if Trump were convicted of a crime, he could still run for office. Even if he were convicted of sedition and was in jail at the time, Trump could still run for office because that's already happened

at the beginning of the 20th century. Eugene Debs, socialist party founder and all the rest of this stuff. He, he was convicted of sedition. He ran for president, I think a fourth time from jail. He got over 3% of the votes. Uh, but if he'd won, he could have been president, you know, and if he'd become president and he had a criminal record or something like that, then, you know, the ball would be in the court for the, the house to, uh, come up maybe with articles of impeachment, then a trial in the Senate and they could remove him. But he would still, uh, you know, nobody questioned the fact that a guy who was in jail for sedition could run. It just comes down to the age requirements, the citizenship requirements, the

residency requirements, and that type of stuff, that's all this in the constitution. There's no prohibition for somebody being convicted of a crime. So, um, the interesting thing is, you know, that, uh, Trump could be in the same, uh, position essentially is this guy and Trump endorsed this guy. This is one of the idiots that he endorsed. Trump doesn't vet anything, nothing. He never looks at the people that he puts in his administration. He doesn't look at the background of the people that he endorses for office.

He simply doesn't care. He will stand behind anybody. As a matter of fact, a couple of weeks after the election, they did a profile of George Santos saying, you know, there's a lot of people, even though, you know, this doesn't typically happen in New York. And even though it didn't work out too well for Trump, it looks like it worked out pretty good in New York. And so George Santos says he is still intending to serve in Congress. The Democrats, of course, don't want him. They want the seat.

But the Republicans don't want him either. But the interesting thing about this is that Kevin McCarthy is not really talking too much about this. DeSantos, not DeSantos, Santos, not DeSantis, it's Santos. Santos says, I'm not a criminal who defrauded the entire country and made up this fictional character. I ran and ran for Congress. No, that's exactly what he did. He didn't defraud the entire country.

He defrauded his district there, but he did make up a fictional character. Everything in his resume is fictional. He says, I've been around a long time. I mean, a lot of people know me. They know who I am. They've done business dealings with me. Oh, have they? Is that where you got the $700,000 who gave him that money?

That's the key. I think in all this stuff, uh, I guess Trump knows him, right? Trump endorsed him. I'm not going to make excuses for this. He said, but a lot of people overstate their resumes or twist a little. And I'm not saying I'm guilty of that. You know, theoretically, you know, I'm, I'm not saying that I'm guilty of it, but a lot of people do it, especially politicians, right? So the House has rules in place that submit its authority over the elections,

says Washington Examiner. According to Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution, elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members, the House may only use these powers to exclude a member from being seated if that member failed to meet specific criteria for membership in the House, which again is age, citizenship, residency. He meets all three of those. So there's absolutely nothing that can be done to block him from being sworn in as a

congressman. They can only do it afterwards. House members do have the authority to punish its members for disorderly behavior. The Constitution states they can vote to expel a member once they are sworn in. Five members of the House and 15 members of the Senate have been expelled under this clause. So it's unclear whether or not Santos would be removed this way as expulsion requires a vote from two thirds of the house members. And it's unlikely that enough Republicans would join Democrats

to reach the necessary threshold. Is that true? I mean, are they really going to, I mean, they've got a pretty narrow margin, but that would not turn over control of the house to the Democrats. They would still have like a two seat majority or something like that, uh, with such a narrow margin as they got right now, it would make it much tighter, but it's, they still have a majority, but they, would they really embrace this kind of corruption for partisan leverage yeah i think so because people are asking kevin mccarthy about it and he declines to say anything about it as a matter of fact the washington examiner contacted his office as well as the national Republican congressional committee.

Uh, the national Republican congressional committee, nor Kevin McCarthy will talk to anybody about this, but again, uh, this article from a couple of weeks after the election, uh, it was on roll call.com how New York became friendly turf for Trump-aligned candidates. They maintained a relentless focus on crime and inflation, says Representative-elect George Santos. So Roll Call said last week, voters from Arizona to Pennsylvania rejected politicians who embraced Trump's agenda.

So how did several Trump-aligned candidates in New York, a state where registered Republicans are outnumbered 2 to 1, how did they defy the political headwinds and win 11 out of 26 seats, including four that had previously been held by Democrats? And one of those four was the George Santos seat. With a relentless focus on crime and inflation, Republican George Santos, a first-generation American who flipped New York's third district, which encompasses parts of Long Island and Northern Queens, said there's a mischaracterization that New Yorkers are very liberal. Here's the reality. We're experiencing crushing inflation.

We're experiencing record cost of energy and crime. I ran a campaign talking to voters about issues that affect them every day. You know, like pretending that he's homosexual when he's heterosexual. Santos had expressed support for Trump in the past. He was in Washington for the Stop the Steal rally in 2021 on January the 6th. But he still beat Democrat Robert Zimmerman by more than nine points in a district that Biden had won by 10 points in 2020. So as we move forward, what is going on with Trump?

58% of voters are not glad that Trump is running again. You know what is interesting is it was reported last week that Pence had filed to run for president in 2024. Now his campaign manager, you know, he's not campaigning, he says, but he does have a campaign

manager. Campaign manager said, we didn't file that paperwork. I mean, who, who filled out the paperwork for Pence and paid the fee and filed it with the federal elections commission? That that's an interesting question right there. We're going to quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. Terima kasih telah menonton! You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, let's talk about what's going on with the pharmaceutical industry,

with mask mandates and the rest of the stuff coming back. Boston is pushing into that. Uh, but before we get to that, the FDA is still trying to increase its power for the longest time. The FDA has been trying to assert authority over dietary supplements. Uh, they have in the past, uh, made moves to say, well, we're not going to let anybody have more than the recommended daily allowance of vitamin c which is only like 60 milligrams that is not enough to help help you

in terms of supplementation and you know we look at things like vitamin d you know we've got these people pushing the pandemic coming after doctors for recommending vitamin D. I said at the very beginning of all this, I quoted people from both the FDA, former officials from both the FDA, as well as current officials from the NIH, saying that vitamin D was not going to stop any virus in and of itself, but what it did was it made your immune system healthier so that you could stop it. I knew how they were going to come after supplements. And I also knew that vitamin D was very important.

So as all this stuff was happening and people got respiratory illness, rather than giving them very dangerous untested drugs like remdesivir and other things like that, a lot of doctors were giving vitamin C, vitamin D, and Dr. Joel Hirshhorn, who I haven't, who I've had on many times, has really focused on vitamin D and pointed out, look, you need to have a particular test. I think it's a blood test to check your vitamin D levels to see how you are metabolizing this, because you can't just say, well, you know, take this much as a supplement. It depends on how your body is going to assimilate that.

And that's going to be different for different people. So he says, yeah, definitely take it. Make sure you have this level, but you're going to have to have tests to see what, uh, how your body is, is responding to that. So to come up with some kind of one size fits all recommended daily allowance, which most people who look at it say that's, that's way too low. Uh, that's just enough to keep you from getting rickets, for example. Uh, that's though where the FDA has been for a very long time. I remember back in 1992, there was a major push to shut down supplements, to shut down what dosages they would allow people to take and all the rest of this stuff.

And when I was with the Libertarian Party, they had a lot to say to push back against it, so much so that Orrin Hatch, who was, for whatever reason, a friend of the supplement industry, came to address the LP when I was there at a national convention talking about how essential it was to stop the FDA from taking away common supplements and vitamins away from people. And now they're at it again. This is an article from Mercola. It says,

Proposed legislation is calling for a federal database for dietary supplements. It requires supplement makers to submit information to the FDA. Known as a mandatory product listing for dietary supplements, they claim that it's a way for the FDA to know what products are on the market and what ingredients they include. Opponents suggest the move could ultimately give the FDA more power to ban supplements from the market, which is what they've been trying to do for many decades.

Why? Well, because they don't want anybody taking anything that's going to make them healthy. They want you sick so that you'll buy the pharmaceutical drugs. These lists could pave the way for the FDA to gain approval power pre-market. In other words, you'd have to get FDA approval before you market something. Multinational companies like Bayer, Nestle, Unilever, Procter & Gamble, and Clorox

have been buying up supplement companies at a frenzied pace. In 2018, there were 83 such transactions. This rose to 137 in 2021. So the supplement market is consolidating. These few companies now want to consolidate regulation and they want to regulate any competitors out of business and make sure that any new competitors don't come into business. This is very common, even at the local level. When you have public health departments put all kinds of restrictions on new restaurants.

You know, you open up, you can't buy used pots and pans and things like that from other restaurants that have gone out of business. You've got to buy all new stuff and all the rest of these things. It's simply cutting off the lower rungs of the ladder to make sure that any competitors can't come up to where you are. That's what it's really about. And this happens at every level of government regulation. The U.S. supplement market was valued at $48 billion in 2021, an expected compounded annual growth rate of 8.9%. In the U.S., where 80% of Americans use dietary supplements, the industry is viewed as trustworthy

by the majority of adults, 79%. Access to high-quality supplements is continually being threatened by legislation. In April, Dick Durbin, Democrat, Illinois, and a Republican from Indiana, Mike Braun, introduced the Dietary Supp dietary supplement listing act of 2022 to require makers to provide information about their products to the fda including but not limited to a list of all ingredients electronic copy of the label allergen statements health and structure function claims so i mean you would want to you would want to know this but the consumer can make these types

of decisions and it can be handled in a number of different ways. As they point out, like we've seen in issues like GMO labeling, where some states required labeling of GMO foods and others didn't until a federal law preempted state labeling laws. Big companies don't like dealing with what they call a patchwork of regulations. You know, we call that the dark act because, uh, you had not only, um, you know, the, the whole fight over GMO labeling put together by, um, you know, Monsanto, which is then bought by bear and, uh, their roundup or glyphosate, or Roundup is a trade name, uh, you had in various communities, farming communities, uh, they would go in and, um, they would try, they would say, well,

we're going to ban the use of this stuff. Why? Because it drifts. Uh, the glyphosate drifts. They came up with another one called Dicambra. Dicambra is even more notorious for drifting onto adjacent land. And it's not just GMO. I said, if you get enough of this stuff, drifting onto your land, it

poisoned the soil and you can't grow anything there except the seeds that have been designed by Monsanto. So it poisons the ground for everything, but their seats. So now you are a captive customer of them. You can't make more seeds for the next planting season. No, it's owned by them, and you have to buy every planting season from them. And so the farmers didn't like that. They passed a law saying we're going to prohibit the use of that within this county.

And several of these things, the, the Monsanto would get, um, heavily invested in this election referendum. And one of them in one small County alone, they spent $8 million to try to convince people to vote against this law, to vote this law out, but it was a rural County and people understood what the issue was. And so that $8 million was just wasted. They lost that. And so their response after losing several of these types of things was to

say, well, we're going to take it to Washington and shut down what's being done at the local level. And that is absolutely unconstitutional. There is no power, uh, in the constitution delegated to the federal government to even have an FDA,

let alone for some federal agency, whether it's the FDA or the EPA or any of these people to come in and, um, tell states or local counties what they can do when it comes to food. And when it comes to growing food, There is no authority. As a matter of fact, it's exactly the opposite. There's no authority for their three-letter alphabet agencies that are going to prohibit this stuff. So mega corporations doing business across the world would likely welcome harmonized levels of supplements

so they can sell their products on the world market without having to change formulas or labels. This is why they're all pushing for one world governance because they don't like the patchwork of regulations that even extend, uh, you know, uh, over countries.

Uh, Mercola says higher end products would be eliminated or quoting, uh, someone who is looking at this says higher end products would be eliminated because they would not meet the harmonized nutrient levels they're going to take everything down the least common denominator because these uh big corporations want to do the stuff on the cheap given the fda's history of attacking dietary supplements this needs to be viewed with extreme caution particularly in regard to what could morph into in the years to come regulatory drift.

There's nothing in there that says that they can do it, but there's nothing in there that prohibits them from having prior approval over all this stuff. Uh, they also have new dietary ingredients guidance under this, any dietary ingredient that was not marketed in the U S and as a dietary supplement before October 15th, 1994 is now considered to be something new. They want to get the prior approval as they would, if it were a new drug. Isn't that ironic given the fact that the FDA didn't do any testing at all of the mRNA jabs, but now they're going to say, if you take any supplement, we're going to, and even worse

going back and claiming that some long established supplements are actually new. Merck's antiviral drug for COVID-19 that goes by the trade name Malnupiravir, I think is the way you pronounce this thing. This supposedly helps to speed up recovery from the virus, but it does not reduce the hospitalization or death rate. Have you heard this before? That's exactly what they told you about remdesivir. Remember, it was Fauci who changed that, right?

Remdesivir was supposed to, you know, it's a therapeutic that's supposed to help you if you're already sick. And the same thing with this, Molnupiravir is supposed to help you to get rid of it. It says, well, it doesn't help anybody. It doesn't do anything to reduce hospitalization or death. But if you do manage to get better, we'll say that you get better faster. That's the new subjective standard that Fauci created for remdesivir. Everybody knew that it didn't work. So he pretended that the people who got better, got better 30% faster. So this is coming from Merck. It's used to treat mild to moderate COVID-19. They said 94% of the people who got this already had three doses of the useless vaccine. And I say useless because they got the doses of the vaccine,

and they diagnosed them as having the disease that the vaccine was supposed to protect from. And then when they take this, after they've taken three doses of the useless vaccine, now they take this useless product from Merck and they supposedly get better slightly faster if they recover, but it doesn't do anything to help anybody with a hospitalization or even death. The study found that participants who received this new Merck drug recovered faster than those who got usual care.

Participants reported, see, they didn't even identify this themselves. They relied on calling the people afterwards. Oh, did you get better? How long did it take you to get better? Oh, okay, great. They said that they reported a median recovery time of nine days compared to 15 days for those who only received the usual care. Are there any adverse effects? Oh, we don't talk about that. But it is very expensive. That's the only thing that they're really concerned about.

And so the UK was the first country to approve this drug, Molnupiravir, for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. I didn't know there was such a thing as mild to moderate COVID-19. Did you? I thought it was the most deadly disease the world has ever known. That's why they had to use these novel approaches of draconian approaches of locking everybody down. Again, you know, from the very beginning, I said, we didn't do this with Ebola. approaches of, uh, draconian approaches of locking everybody down again.

You know, from the very beginning, I said, we didn't do this with Ebola. As a matter of fact, the same people, the same guy, even in Dallas, you know, Clay Jenkins, the local, uh, Dallas judge there again, the highest ranking official in the County. Um, when Ebola came to town with an illegal alien who subsequently died from it and two nurses who treated him nearly died, he said, ah, don't worry about this. I go to your football games.

We've got lots of hospitals. We've got lots of daughters. We'll doctors. We'll take care of it. But when COVID came to town, it was so much worse than Ebola. No, he was, you know, he had a single mom who's trying to keep her hairdressing salon open there. I think Shelly Luther was her name.

And he, you know, tries to put her in jail with a massive fine, unlike Ebola. So it's the worst thing we've ever had. But they've got a drug now for mild to moderate cases of COVID-19. I didn't know there was such a thing. And, of course, it doesn't work. But this is the new rules that have been put in by Fauci for the pharmaceutical companies. Australians are dying at an incredibly high pace. This is coming, this is an article out of Australia sent to me by a listener in Australia. High excess mortality being reported. Australia's

peak actuarial body has asked the government to urgently investigate the country's incredibly high 13% excess death rate in 2022. Again, as I've reported in the past, Australia did not report that many cases of COVID-19 because they kept everybody locked down under credible draconian measures. Instead, they vaccinated everybody. And so this is not something that they can blame on COVID. Everybody is looking at talking about long COVID. I don't think there is such a thing as long COVID. I think what you're seeing here is adverse effects on vaccines being called long COVID. Just had an article about long COVID being worse

to people who are obese or this or that. I mean, they come up with every kind of justification. It'll be anything other than the vaccine. And so the Washington post is very concerned that growing vaccine hesitancy is now fueling measles and chicken pox resurgence in the U S is that a problem? It's not a problem for anybody unless they are a pharmaceutical salesperson, you know, uh, like this guy, you know, like this guy. They have to get the shot.

Yeah, measles. Vaccinations are so important. This is really going around now. They have to get their shot. So, you know, when it comes to the vaccine industry and pharmaceutical, Washington Post and Donald Trump are on exactly the same page. That's what he was saying. We had a handful of people that got sick with measles.

They treated that as if it was going to be something that's going to kill everybody. Said we're going to force people even in private religious schools who have an objection to this, we're going to force them to get it. So now they're saying, well, you know, measles and chicken pox are surging. Nowhere in this article do they say anybody's going to the hospital or dying. We never heard of that when I was a child. It did happen. But as they're fond of

saying for their vaccines, it was extremely rare, extremely rare. Most of the 82 children infected so far are old enough to get the shots, but their parents chose not to, said officials, resulting in the country's largest outbreak of the pathogen measles this year. Again, the absurdity of the situation and the lengths to which they will go. We have a pastor who's donated a kidney to a church member. And when I saw this, I thought, is this something, are they easing up now? Because we had so many people who were denied being donors, you know, specific donors of kidneys, you know,

when all this stuff started in late 2021 or the middle of 2021. First time we saw the denial of a donation, it was because you had a friend, they was, uh, because, uh, you had, um, a friend, uh, they, they become friends in a Bible study. She said, I'll donate my kidney to you, but the hospital would not perform it. It was in Colorado. They said, no, you can't come in. You got to both the donor and the recipient have to be vaccinated.

We're not going to let you in. It's like, how can that be? I'm not getting in front of the line with anybody. This is somebody that I know who's donating this kidney to me directly. Well, you got a pastor now who's able to do this. It doesn't say whether or not they were vaccinated. I don't know if this is backtracking. I do know that Boston is looking into putting in mask mandates as the students come back from their

Christmas holiday. Of course, CBS calls it the winter break and they say the mask mandate will be temporary. It'll only be for two weeks. Where did I hear that before? There's something about two weeks of flattening the curve or something, a thousand 21 days ago. Uh, I don't think that's going to be the case. Uh, Ty, a listener writes and says, uh, Mr. Knight, I just an observation I made over the last three years. One I've heard nobody mentioned, uh, direct flights from Wuhan into New York city. He said, uh, I looked to see, and yes, there was one. There was one back in late 2019, early 2020, a direct flight bringing the most deadly virus ever known to mankind right into New York City.

And the idiot in charge at the time didn't take credit for canceling flights into the U.S. from China until much later. Other than not trusting government one iota, that was one of my main reasons for not being concerned in the slightest. It may not seem like a big deal in hindsight, but at the time I felt it was valuable information. I think everything that happened in New York was very key to understanding that this was not a deadly pandemic. And we had Jason Goodman and many other citizen journalists going from hospital to hospital, getting chased away. But some of the ones who got in showed that they were not busy, that the things were empty. I mean, it's just, but still, I think the key thing is, you know, we had pandemic

nurse. She wrote a book about her experience. We saw the unused army hospital, field hospital, the unused Franklin Graham hospital, the unused hospital ships, uh, what a fraud this has been. And yet if we don't watch out, we don't keep vigilant about this. They're going to continue to run this. They've left everything in place. And as I pointed out earlier, it is war that they want to take us to. Well, as I said before, tomorrow we are going to have replays of interviews as well as on Friday. For those who are members on Rockfin and listen to the special premium content that we have there on Thursday nights, we're not going to do that tomorrow night either.

So I'm taking a couple of days off. The family and I need a little bit of a break. Uh, and again, like a lot of other people, I guess, uh, it's probably a good thing that we're way up a Hill because we're not tempted to get out on the main road where we might find a patch of ice and have an accident. We know we're not going to make it down this Hill. So we've been here, uh, in the house for about a week. Uh, tomorrow it'll be about a week, so we desperately need to get out and take a little bit of time off. But we plan to be back the Monday after New Year's. So we'll see you on Monday, January the 2nd.

Have a happy New Year. Thank you so much for your support, and we'll see you in the new year. The common man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you.