The David Knight Show - 28Mar23 Xi Knows Power Comes From a Barrel of Oil; Schools: From LGBT Tyranny to Terrorism

Episode Date: March 28, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES While no US refinery has been allowed to be built during the presidencies of Clinton, George W Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden — China and Saudis are partnering for massive NEW refineries in China while we shut down what we have in USA. Mao's axiom was "political power (domestic) grows out of the barrel of gun" but Xi understand economic and geopolitical power come out of a barrel of oil. 2:07Crypto-takedown accelerates as world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange is sued by the US government and others to follow soon 9:10If US govt wants to shut down oil for the globalist agenda, why are we stealing Syrian oil — and WHY is there a sudden escalation in fighting there? 19:50Trump seized Syrian oil fields in 2019 24:38Ukraine says they're starving for weapons & ammunition. Maybe they can buy some of the UNBELIEVABLY MASSIVE cache of weapons we left behind in Afghanistan. 28:28 Daniel Ellsberg, Pentagon Papers leaker, says we're using nuclear weapons right now. 40:33Transgender shoots up Christian school, killing 3 young children and 3 adults. Leftists say the problem is "guns". But we never had 30% of young girls wanting to commit suicide before — why is that? 45:36Church in New York is fighting Hochul's ban on carrying in "sensitive areas". 1:00:45Transgender "Jazz" Jennings whose book, supposedly written as he "transitioned" at the age of 5, "I Am Jazz" says 16 years later he’s confused about his gender transition, “breaking down” and “spiraling into negativity.” 1:10:54AOC rant against parental rights shows the pro-LGBT left really is after your kids. 1:17:41You can have complete control of your child’s education if YOU do it. 1:19:14GOP bills in Congress would expand federal meddling in education. It's a trap. 1:26:12RFK, Jr's Children Health Defense, as good as they have been about exposing vaccine dangers, are pushing the pagan fable of Gaia, Mother Earth, and humans as a dangerous virus 1:41:56Suprise? Climate activist groups strongly support abortion and want fewer people. 1:44:46When satire becomes reality. Babylon Bee has predicted the crazy future over 100 times. 1:50:15CNN accuses white people of "Digital Blackface" for using memes with black people. 1:53:50New Scottish Prime Minister, a Muslim, makes one of the most bigoted, hateful, racist speeches you'll hear. He hates the fact that there are so many WHITE people in Scotland (96% actually). 1:59:07What can the average person do to safeguard their sovereignty and freedom of travel against "15 Minute City" or “Smart City?” 2:05:50 WATCH: China's central planners created imitation cities of Europe. But no one wants to live there or even visit 2:19:50The quartering act of 1774 and the violation of the third amendment — TODAY. Technology changes, but not human nature or tyranny. 2:24:27It wasn't just agent provocateurs and police entrapping people on J6. The FBI has continued to push informants and spies into the legal proceedings to spy on defendants and defense counsel. 2:49:06Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Come on, come on, yes, yes, come on. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Oh, curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering.

No, we bet. More power to you. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 28th of March, year of our Lord 2023, a 1,111 days of an executive order. It's interesting that in the proclamation about the tranny shooting up of a Christian school, the murder of three children, three adults by a transgender, you had Biden, although he didn't tell people to pray for the victims, he did mention year of our Lord. Well, today we're going to begin with economic power coming out of a barrel of oil. Try to understand that. It was Mao who said political power comes out of the barrel of a gun. Well, economic power comes out of a barrel of oil.

And that includes geopolitical power. That's where we're going to begin today. Stay with us. As I said yesterday, the move to get rid of the petrodollar is already underway in a big way. Saudi Arabia announced in January at the Davos meeting that they were going to be accepting payment in the Chinese yuan. Said, yeah, we'll also take the U.S. dollar. That is declaration that the petrodollar is going down. Now, they haven't started doing that yet, but they are making major moves into China.

Also, over the weekend, I talked yesterday about how they had brokered peace between warring nations in the Middle East in order to bring together this Petro Alliance to take down the Petrodollar, brokering peace talks between Saudi Arabia, Iran, and others. And so now the Saudis announced over the weekend that they are making major investments in China in terms of refineries. Ramco, which is the Saudi Arabian quasi-nationalized oil industry there, said that it's going to build a $10 billion refinery in China. $10 billion oil refinery in China.

Hours later, it revealed that it would acquire a 10% stake in a top Chinese oil refinery as well. And so when we look at what is happening with this, it truly is amazing to see that China is continuing to build multi-billion dollar project after one after the other when it comes to coal-fired power plants, and now also with refineries. A $10 billion refinery and a petrochemical complex in China's northeast over the next three years. And China has a huge demand for energy. Why?

Because they're allowed to do all the manufacturing that we are not allowed to do. As a matter of fact, this complex, just to give you an idea of how big this is, $10 billion, a lot of money, but its production is also very big. 300,000 barrels of crude a day. The Saudis will supply two-thirds of that to them as raw material. It's scheduled for completion in 2026, about the same time that we're phasing out all of our cars. Why would they do that? Well, because it's for their internal consumption.

They're going to actually build things in China. While we have our government strangling us and shutting us down by fiat. And Republicans stand idly by while this is happening, while the Democrats are doing this. And so there is also another project that will have 320,000 barrels per day. Uh, that is also involving a Ramco. And so when you put these two things together, you got about 620,000 barrels of oil there. Plus there's another refinery that they're going to supply with 480,000 barrels. You're over a million barrels per day.

They're building their capacity while we're shutting everything down. Shutting down our coal plants, shutting down our oil plants, forcing everybody to go to unproven, unworkable, renewable energies because they're serious about this. And, you know, it was only June of last year that we had the CEO of Chevron. His name is Mike Wirth. He said June, I think it was June 22nd last year that we had the CEO of Chevron. His name is Mike Worth. He said June, I think it was June 22nd last year. He said there will never be another refinery built in the USA.

But the Saudis are going to build a couple in China. Tens of billions of dollars. But there'll never be another one built in the USA. Mike Worth said for 29 years, every project that we've had has been shut down by the federal government. but there'll never be another one built in the USA. Mike Wirth said, for 29 years, every project that we've had has been shut down by the federal government. Now, who has been president? Which presidents have we had for the last 29 years?

Well, you go back 29 years, June 2022. That was when Clinton became president, 1993. So through the eight years of Clinton, through the eight years of George W. Bush, through the eight years of Obama, and through the four years of Trump and the two years of Biden, no refineries approved. Kind of got the idea, I guess. Didn't take 29 years of denials for people to understand that if the Federal Reserve is not going to allow any Bitcoin handling banks to be chartered,

not going to allow any of the Bitcoin companies to have a charter as a bank, and they're going to prohibit and shut down any banks that handle Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies. It's pretty clear where they're going. You know, they didn't put it in writing. There will be no more oil refineries. There will be no more Bitcoin transaction, but they make it clear how they can do this. They have their ways. You have to understand how they do this. You have to understand how they get what they want by making people dependent on their fiat currency. Now, we're going to give you a subsidy, and this is now being put out by Republicans. We want to give people a subsidy to go to private schools, to homeschool, and all the rest of this stuff. You're seeing it in Florida with DeSantis. Oh yeah, the money will follow the student. And you also see it in the federal government, which has absolutely no authority to

be involved in education in any way, shape, or form. But the Republicans in Washington, rather than shutting down the Department of Education, are now going to try to addict parents to the money, just like they've addicted schools? How did the schools get to the point where parents want to leave, where you've got boys being put in girls' bathrooms and showers, where you have Marxism being taught all the time? Well, that all came from the money. And if you don't do that, the government pulls back the money. You need to understand everything they do is not to help us. They're not giving you a helping hand. They're trying to make you dependent upon them. They'll give you money up front. And now we've got some new rules and regulations. And if you don't follow those new rules,

we pull the money. I don't know how I can live without that money now that I've become dependent on it, you see. And so they have their ways to do things. When it comes to prohibiting stuff, they typically do it through gradual smothering of things with regulations. We see that happening now with appliances. More and more regulations are not coming out saying, well, no, we're not going to ban gas stoves. We're just going to put so many regulations on them that they'll be too expensive to be able to be used, just like we did with cars for decades. And then finally we say, okay, that's it. We're just killing them. We're going to ban the cars. And so this is a process that they do all the time. And they're killing our country.

They're killing our country by starving us of energy. You starve a country of energy, you starve it of its geopolitical power. You starve it of its ability to provide for itself. You make it dependent. Dependent on whom? Dependent on the coming government, the global government. Dependent on a handout. And so the over 20-year period Aramco is going

to provide a tax credit or rather a credit to the Chinese companies of nearly a billion dollars 800 million dollars now this is over the next 20 years wait a minute I thought even China was supposed to start reducing their carbon footprint and all the rest of this nonsense. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way

on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you. T&C Supply. 18 plus. Bet responsibly. Gamblingcare.ie. In 20 years. They're laughing at us. this whole thing is nothing the parents climate accord is nothing but a massive transference of economic and political power because economic power is political power geopolitical power political power within a

country comes from gun control but geopolitical power means a strong economy and they're destroying our economy deliberately and that of Western Europe as well. And so when you look at what is happening with crypto, this is an article from Health Impact News. Crypto takedown accelerates as world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, is sued by the U.S. government. And so they're not content to say you won't have any kind of

access to the Federal Reserve System. We're not going to give you that charter, that permission. And it's not enough to say we're going to shut down banks to tell essentially the banks we're going to shut you down and to do it at least two of those three banks that was the issue i think it was a big issue with the other one as well uh because they're trying to prop up first republic which is in real bad shape just because the actions of the finance of the federal reserve the financial uh malfeasance of the financial of the federal reserve, the financial, uh, malfeasance of the financial, of the federal reserve. If you want to say that it wasn't intentional, but they've created these problems that have put banks, a lot of banks into, um,

into financial straights, but these banks that they chose to shut down first, some of them were in better shape. Some of them much better shape. Silvergate, for example, did not fail. It was shut down, shut down voluntarily, shut down because they essentially had a gun held to their head. And so now when you look at the next stage of the crypto shutdown, already you had different crypto people saying, well, I guess the message is pretty clear. We've got to get out of the United States. But it's not going to stop there because Binance is not headquartered in the United States, but it's being sued by the U.S. government.

It's looking more and more each passing day, says Health Impact News, that the U.S. financial system is speeding into a consolidation of the big banks as their war against cryptocurrencies appears to now be accelerating. Monday, Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, along with their chief executive officer, Changping Zhao, are being sued by the U.S. government. It's outside the U.S. Part of it is a China play, but it's really the cryptocurrency. This follows a report last week that Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the U.S., is also being threatened with a lawsuit, also by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In a time when millions of Americans are pulling billions in deposits from failing banks, allocating them to gold and to Bitcoin, U.S. regulators are scrambling to come up with a means to hammer cryptos and punish those who fled the fiat realm and run toward Bitcoin, and they may have just come up with a solution. And again, this is, however, not a reaction to the bank failures. This has been going on for months, as I read you the timeline. You know, going back, frankly, going back before FTX failure, SBF and all the rest of that stuff, it went on before that.

They used that to ramp it up. Perhaps they were complicit in that as well. But all this push against crypto goes back for many months before and they've targeted crypto uh with the the push towards the cbdc and the federal reserve's complete control of our economy in a direct way to each and every one of us not just manipulating things you know like the money monetary supply of interest rates but directly manipulating each and every one of us for their financial gain and for complete surveillance and control for a system of tyranny. Bitcoin and cryptos are in freefall now,

following a Bloomberg report that Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, and the CEO are being sued by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission for allegedly breaking trading and derivative rules with violating laws around offering future transactions. These are new rules that they put out. They said, you didn't implement our new rules. We talked earlier about how difficult it was getting for us

to be able to deal with Coinbase, and have to deal with Coinbase. If I have to deal with Coinbase. If people leave tips on Rockfin, they go into crypto, I have to get it out, convert it over to Ethereum and Coinbase and all the rest, and Coinbase ramped up all of their ID stuff. And it created a real headache for us. I don't know, I don't like that kind of ID that you got. My passport's not good enough for you? No, no, don't like that kind of idea that you got you my passport's not good enough for you no no don't like that so anyway um this is where it is and so what has happened the price

of bitcoin yesterday dropped three and a half percent went down from 28 000 had a big gain you know remember it wasn't that long ago 16 17 000 now jumped up to 28 000 dropped down now to 27 000 three and a half percent drop. And, um, again, when we look at these other banks that have failed signature, even Barney Frank, uh, left doesn't want to believe Barney Frank. Yeah. Who did the Dodd Frank bill? I said, uh, yeah, it was, uh, the coming F that sending the message to about crypto, they want to shut it down. It was like, oh, don't say that. Get Elizabeth Warren out there and say, oh no, it's a, it was the coming after sending the message about crypto. They want to shut it down.

It's like, oh, don't say that. Get Elizabeth Warren out there and say, no, it's a, it was all about crypto and all the fraud. We had to shut it down for that anyway. So they're coming after them, charging them for failing to register as a futures commission merchant designating. These are new regulations that they put in designating Are they designated contract market or swap execution facilities? They had poorly supervised their business. Oh, there you go.

That's a pretty broad claim, vague claim. Not implementing know-your-customer rules. And poor anti-evasion program. You're not spying on people like we told you to spy on people. Isn't that interesting? and poor anti-evasion program. You're not spying on people like we told you to spy on people. Isn't that interesting? Kind of puts that in all this stuff about TikTok and everything in an interesting perspective. Who is it that's really spying on you?

Of course, it's the U.S. government that is spying on you. The Chinese would like to spy on U.S. government officials if they got TikTok accounts. This is all just like 5G, right? Trump, 5G, 5G, but stop the Chinese because Chinese are going to use it for surveillance. Only we will be surveilling you. The U.S. government will still surveil you, but hey, don't mention that. Don't talk about that.

No, we don't want to have Huawei doing the surveillance with 5G. And we don't want TikTok doing surveillance of Americans because that's our job, as Babylon Bee pointed out. That's exactly the way that they see this. And of course, that's what they want all the crypto exchanges and all the banks to do is to become essentially informants, the know your customer stuff, anti-evasion programs, anti-evasion of what? Money laundering and all the rest of this stuff. So they said Binance actively facilitated violations of U.S. law by assisting U.S. customers in evading compliance controls and instructing customers to obscure their location using virtual private networks, VPNs. Do you really need to have coaching and help from Binance?

I honestly think that anybody that's dealing in crypto certainly knows about VPNs. I mean, you know, VPNs are a lot less complicated and risky than crypto is, quite frankly. So again, Binance instructed U.S. customers to use VPNs and told VIP customers how to skirt compliance controls. They say that Binance consists of more than 120 entities around the world, and they're just not spying for the American government as much as they should be. So as Brian points out, how much longer is the Davos crowd going to be able to continue to do this type of thing and prop up their failing system. When we come back, we're going to take a look at what is going on in the Middle East. And it's all part of this competition, this geopolitical competition. Again, if you remember Syria,

we talked about this for years, especially Gerald Slinty and I would talk about it. This whole thing about Syria, don't they realize this is about an oil pipeline? You know, the U.S. had a partner and they wanted to run the oil from their country into Europe across Syria. The Soviets, or the Soviets, out of habit, the Russians

had partnered with Syria, and the Syrian government wanted the Russian government to have a pipeline running through there. So we decided that we would overthrow that government. We would have a civil war there so we could get our pipeline through. And now we have been stealing the oil, as you see. What is China doing? China is brokering peace deals between these organizations because they're playing the long game. They're working out a way to get rid of the petrodollar, which has been the foundation of our economic shenanigans, which has allowed us to basically get away with no responsibility whatsoever.

At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering.

NoviBet. More power to you. T&C Supply 18+. Bet responsibly. GamblingCare.ie. Anything that we do. We'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Welcome back. And as I was saying, you know, General Salenti and I have talked about what was really going on in Syria. The real purpose of that. You know, blood for oil. Their blood, our blood.

We don't care, right? The elites don't care, at least. By the way, if you want to subscribe to Gerald Slenty's Trends Journal at TrendsJournal.com, you can see a sample of it. It's a great magazine online. And you can subscribe to that. If you give them the code NIGHT, you'll save 10% there. Trends journal,

um, Gerald Santee, and always been a good friend of this broadcast. Uh, so the white house is saying that us troops are in Syria and they're there to stay. They're not leaving because we had this back and forth. You had a drone strike on the,

on the American military base wait we got the american military is in syria yeah they're stealing the oil we'll talk about how they got there so you have this uh strike and then uh the u.s does a counter-strike and then they do a counter-strike and the white house national security council spokesman john kirby you know i played for you yesterday yeah i said um I said, we are the world leader. We're the world leader. I was saying that seven times in his little broadcast. And so I said, yeah, we're there to stay.

He said, here's what's not going to change. The mission in ISIS is not going to change. We have under 1,000 troops in Syria that are going after that network. While greatly diminished, it's still viable and still critical. So we're going to stay at that task. Oh, it's about ISIS, is it? We've shown you over and over again over the years. Testimony from people who are there.

Video of it. We're giving arms to ISIS, just like we armed Al Qaeda, just like we armed the Mujahideen. Also, I want to jump in real quick. He says ISIS is never going to change. Have they not paid attention to what's going on with the Taliban? They're on Twitter complaining about how the fact they all have desk jobs now. Just get out of the country and these people implode yeah well they're also showing how they've got this massive trove of equipment that is there which i think is amazing they're just like rubbing it they're on twitter they're rubbing showing the pictures of all their vehicles and everything else

and it's like look at the gift from joe biden isn't this great? So we've got a thousand troops in Syria. He said just under the Syrian government opposes the occupation of the eastern portion of Syria, which allows the U.S. to control most of Syria's oil resources. Isn't that interesting? At the same time that they are forbidding us to have oil. OK, they want to control it. And so this makes it very easy for China to broker deals between the Saudis and Syria and Iran and all these others to create a petro you want and to get rid of the pet of

the petro dollar. Uh, so the U S also is maintaining crippling economic sanctions on Syria. The U.S. occupation always risks sparking a wider war, says antiwar.com. A drone attack that killed a U.S. contractor and wounded five U.S. soldiers last week brought attention to this. Then the U.S. counterstruck, and according to a U.K.-based Syrian observatory, they said the U.S. airstrikes killed 19 fighters, including three Syrian troops, 11 Syrian fighters, and pro-government militias, and five non-Syrian fighters who were lined with the government.

Nineteen. So there you go. Just like Vietnam, we're winning the body count. Just like Vietnam, right? Except this is really about the oil. You had October of 2019. President Trump says we're going to keep Syria's oil. And Health Impact News says Americans are now dying in Syria

to protect Syrian oil fields. They were seized by the U.S. military under Trump. Under Trump. So, you know, the guy who is anti-war, right? We're going to have World War III if we don't get Trump in. And Trump is going to end all the wars. He didn't end the one in Afghanistan, did he? Didn't pull the troops out of there, did he?

No, that was a fire drill by Biden. Trump used that to criticize him, except Trump had four years to do it in an orderly process, and he didn't do it. So was the seizure of the Syrian oil fields by Trump in 2019, was it legal? Trump has a long history of calling for the U.S. to, quote, take the oil in the Middle East, in Iraq, in Syria in particular.

But any oil in both countries belongs to their government according to U.S. law and the treaties that the U.S. government has ratified. Seizing it would be pillaging, a technical term for theft during wartime that is illegal under U.S. and international law. Well, you mean we violated a treaty? We violated every treaty with the Indians we ever made, said Russell Means, and he said, and where white men feared to tread, he said, hey, white men, the Constitution is your treaty that the government has made with you.

And guess what? They violated every aspect of that as well. Just like they violated all the treaties with the Indians, all the treaties, the governments everywhere. We're keeping the oil said Trump in a press conference back in October, 2019. He says, I've always said that keep the oil. We want to keep the oil $45 million a month. Keep the oil. We want to keep the oil. $45 million a month. Keep the oil.

We've secured the oil. What is it about this guy that people love? I don't understand. I really don't understand it. I mean, they genuinely love him. You know, when I saw him, I was kind of my attitude when he was running against Hillary. It was the same as Julian Assange. He said, we know that Hillary is a warmonger, a corrupt criminal, vicious.

We don't know what Trump is. Let's see what he is. You know, that was my attitude towards Trump. You hold your nose and vote for him. Not in 2020. No way. No way ever. I am now a never Trumper.

Proud of it as well. The attacks on the U.S. military bases in Syria followed the recent announcement that Saudi Arabia was normalizing relations with Iran in a peace initiative brokered by China. And so Brian at Health Impact News says, well, maybe, and other people are saying it as well. Rumors are swirling that Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Syria

are on the verge of a geopolitical economic agreement that will sidestep the U.S. So it's not surprising that just as these deals are being announced, there's a sudden resurgence of fighting between U.S. forces in Syria and Iran because they're saying, well, that was an Iranian drone. They offered no evidence of that. But, you know, hey, we're not going to directly go to war with Saudi Arabia. As a matter of fact, we support them in their war against Yemen.

But, hey, we could go to war directly with Syria and Iran. In January of this year, again, a Saudi Arabian finance minister said, you know, we're going to start accepting payment, uh, in the Chinese Yuan. And so then that brings us to the picture, show the pictures of,

uh, some of the stuff in the article that I sent you disturbing new photos of us military equipment in Afghanistan. This is how the Taliban is a trolling everybody. And of course, in 2007, Biden says, um, you leave the weapons behind the

middle East, there'll be used against us, right? From black Hawks to bullets, bulldozers, and pallets of cash. That's wnd.com course. Gateway pundit has also got the pictures as well. The handover of war weapons made the Taliban at the time. One of the best equipped militarily, one of the best equipped countries in the world. But now we've surpassed that by giving Ukraine all that.

I don't know if we left behind tens of billions. Maybe we did in Afghanistan. It'd be interesting to look at this list of equipment and say, did we leave behind more in Afghanistan than we've given so far to Ukraine? It's frequently been reported since Biden ordered the sudden American troop retreat, run away, run away, that Biden didn't order the equipment destroyed. He just left it behind to the Taliban, which was to make the lethality of the terror organization much, much worse. But we got to stay in Syria to fight ISIS, you know? No, no, we just leave these weapons for them and say, well, I don't know how that fell

into their hands. I have no idea about that. Look, there's so many weapons there. There's absolutely no way that the U.S. could not have done an orderly withdrawal. They weren't under that kind of military pressure. It was the insanity of how they had staged that. They leave the biggest air base there in Bagram, and then they try to bug out from a commercial air base

that they couldn't really defend. Everything about it was so incompetent. You have to ask yourself if it was deliberate. That's my yardstick. It's like, well, you can explain up to a certain degree things by incompetence, but then at that point, it starts to become malicious and deliberate. The report estimated that 600,000 weapons were left behind, as were 75,000 vehicles and 200 aircraft. Yeah, it might be actually more than we've given Ukraine so far. I don't know. 2,000 armored vehicles, including Humvees and MRAPs, 45 Black Hawk helicopters, 50 Scout attack choppers,

more than 20,000 grenades, 16,000 night vision goggles. Maybe we could buy this stuff back and give it to Ukraine because they need some more weapon, you know. 162,000 pieces of encrypted military communication gear. Thousands of air-to-ground missiles or rockets. Laser units. Encrypted cell phones, laptops, and of course, we saw this at the very beginning, pallets and pallets and pallets and pallets of millions of dollars in cash. I don't think they're going to be able to enforce a cashless society in Afghanistan for quite some time. But maybe they'll be able to do it better here in the U S because we left so much of our freshly uncirculated cash there in Afghanistan. And then of course, bulldozers, backhoes, dump trucks, and excavators,

the gaily, the gateway pundit said, it really is as if we lost the war. Well, we did lose a war. And now we're paying reparations to the terrorists. No, we are arming terrorists because we have to have an enemy, right? We've got to continue to have these enemies, you know, like ISIS somehow. And so we've got to stay there to fight ISIS. No, we're staying there to grab the oil. And we're doing that too.

Oh, it's just amazing. We can't have oil. Europe can't have oil, but we're going to steal the oil from Syria for whatever reason. Zelensky, by the way, is admitting that Ukraine is already out of ammunition. Hey, pal, call the Taliban. I'm sure you can do a deal with it. I mean, you look at all the aid that we gave them. It's about 120120 billion now.

And a lot of that was economic aid. So yeah, I'm sure they'll sell it to you. They're not going to give it to you for free like the US government, but they'll sell it to you. I know where you can find a lot of ammunition. We do not have the ammunition. For us, the situation in the East is not good. Well, here's the observations from uh zero hedge article first it proves that russia is not winning nato's self-declared race of logistics see we can always do better we can uh again going back to what happened with uh world war ii that same mindset is there we are the arsenal of democracy and we can outproduce any of our foes and thereby win the war. Except we shut down our production.

We don't have energy. We're not allowed to have coal plants on the grid. We don't want oil and all the rest of this stuff. There's just this disconnect that the American people don't understand because the people in Washington understand it perfectly well. And so secondly, they said that, um,

uh, the amount, uh, even though we're going to win this, uh, war of production, right? We can outproduce them and we can give them a hundred billion dollars.

And yet Russia's still got weapons to throw at Ukraine, and Ukraine doesn't have them. And then, of course, it also shows what the Washington Post has been saying, that the Ukrainian forces are not doing too well. One thing that this article does not say is that, yes, they're going to beg for even more aid and that's what a lot of this is about and that's why the washington post ran that story it wasn't an admission that they'd been lying to us about how ukraine was you know whipping the russians

everywhere you know putin is dying and he's crazy and he's got people trying to assassinate him all oh that may be true uh but they're still losing the war they're going to beg for more material and it's going to get to the point as i've said many times against oh well we just can't do it we're going to have to have your troops because zlinski says there's not going to be any counteroffensive he said you know you guys want us to counter-attack we we don't we kind have more weapons. But they don't have the soldiers either, right, for a counterattack. Already Poland says, well, if you can't do it, we'll come down there and do it. We want to go toe-to-toe with the Ruskies. But, of course, this also shows when Zelensky says,

we don't have a counteroffensive unless you send more weapons, we're up against the ropes. He's a surrogate for NATO. He's a puppet of NATO. He's using his people's lives, as we've said against the ropes. He's a surrogate for NATO. He's a puppet of NATO. He's using his people's lives, as we've said from the very beginning. At the very beginning of this, a year ago, I was playing Eclipse from the Indian Defense Ministry. India was in a neutral position. They were telling everybody the truth about this militarily. Interestingly enough, they were saying the same thing that Colonel McGregor says. And they said, this is very cynical.

The Zelensky government is just going to use their people as cannon fodder in a surrogate war for NATO. And they'll do it so that they can get into the NATO globalist club, which is what Arestovich said in 2019, right after they got elected on a campaign of peace. He said, there will be no peace. I'm the negotiator to the peace. There's not going to be any peace. As a matter of fact, in three years in 2022, we'll be a full on war with Russia.

This country will be completely annihilated, but the good news is the really good news is we get into NATO as part of that club. The people who are sacrificing their own people will be able to get into that club. And so they don't have any ammunition. They don't have the other stuff. So they've repurposed some Starlink drones. If you look at this video here, they're showing some of their equipment. This is homemade guerrilla war. And this is one thing that I would say to people who say, well, let's have it on. Let's have a civil war here in America. This is what it's going to

devolve into. And we've seen the pictures of them dropping chemical weapons onto Russian soldiers. Chemical weapons that are prohibited under international treaty because it's such a horrific thing. And so here he is. He's going to demonstrate to you. He's got it in his refrigerator. He's got some

canisters. It looks like homemade stuff, it's labeled And they put it on these drones And he's threatening, we're going to drop this on you That was a video that was circulating on Twitter Repurposed from Starlink drones And that's the way this whole thing is going to roll. If you have a civil war anywhere, it's going to just keep devolving into that. Never stops. Even if it doesn't go into a nuclear war, which one would, uh, would you rather have? Well, you know, you got one way to one life to live,

take it away one way or the other. Daniel Ellsberg, the guy who leaked the Pentagon papers, it was a followup article with him and with him and did an interview with him in Boston. And the interviewer said, well, we tend to think of the classification system as a system of protection. But you sometimes talk about it, I think correctly, as a system of control. That's exactly what it is. It's not just military secrets. So it all began with national security. We've got to protect our nuclear weapons because we don't want the Ruskies to have the nuclear weapons and so forth. But now everything is classified, as you've seen over and over again. Unnecessarily, everything, even whether you're talking about their kill shots,

everything is classified. And Ellsberg says the media as a whole has never really investigated the secrecy system and what it's for and what its effects are. For example, the best people on declassification outside the military, the National Security Archive, month after month, year after year, they put out newly disclosed classified information that they have worked sometimes three or four years maybe 10 or 20 years to make it public and all that stuff about um the gfk assassination papers which i seriously doubt that there's anything there now you think that uh they're going to have some incriminating evidence of what the CI did to kill him. And they're going to say, well, let's just classify it.

Nobody will ever know. Of course not. But for some reason, there's something there that they don't want you to see. I don't know why they haven't destroyed it yet, but Trump doesn't want you to see it. Biden doesn't want you to see it. That's one of the things he said he was going to do. Of course, he didn't do it. Biden doesn't want it declassified either.

He said very little of that was justified to be kept from the public for that long. An expert estimated in Congress in 1971 that only about 5% of classified information met the criteria for secrecy at the time that it was classified. And then after a few years, that decreased to one half of 1%.

Then they changed the topic and they asked Daniel Ellsberg, they said, what is it like to live surrounded by thoughts of nuclear war and unaccountable government? Now, he's 92 years old now, Daniel Ellsberg.

He says, I think about nuclear war not because I find it fascinating, but because I want to prevent it to make it unthinkable because I care about the world that it would destroy. The questioner says, well, Robert McNamara, who was Secretary of Defense during the Cuban Missile

Crisis, once said, the indefinite combination of human fallibility and nuclear weapons will destroy nations. And so they said, why haven't we seen nuclear weapons used since 1945? And Ellsberg says, well, we have seen nuclear weapons used many times. And they're being used right now by both sides in Ukraine. Because they're being used as threats. Just as a bank robber uses a gun even if he doesn't pull the trigger. You're lucky if you can get your way in some part without pulling the trigger. And we've done that dozens of times.

But eventually, as any gambler knows, your luck runs out. And so for 70 years, the U.S. has frequently made use of the wrongful first use threats of nuclear weapons that Putin is doing right now in Ukraine. We should never have done that, nor should Putin be doing it now. He says, I'm worried that his monstrous threat of nuclear war to retain Russian control of Crimea is not a bluff. He says, Biden campaigned in 2020 on a promise to declare a policy of no first use of nuclear weapons. Trump opposed him on that. But Biden should keep that promise. And the world should demand the same commitment from Putin. We'll be right back. I'm going to go ahead and do that. Decoding the mainstream propaganda.

It's the David Knight Show. They're probably watching me. Well, let them. Let them see what kind of a person I am. I'm not even going to swat that fly. I hope they are watching. They'll see. They'll see and they'll know. And they'll say, why, she wouldn't even harm a fly. Yes, transgenders are no threat to us at all.

As a matter of fact, we're the threat to them. We're driving them to suicide and other mental illness that they have. I tweeted this yesterday as we had a Norma Bates shooter. This was a female who now identifies as a male. So she's not Norman Bates. She goes the other way. Norma Bates shooter. This was a female who now identifies as a male. So she's not Norman Bates. She's, you know, it goes the other way.

Norma Bates, Abby normal, maybe perhaps as, as Igor would say. I said for years, we have had SSRIs have been the driving people nuts and causing these shootings and we blame them on the guns. And now it's the SSRI in many, many cases.

Uh, and now, uh, we're driving people nuts with other chemicals and with a psychological gaslighting starting in kindergarten. Why is it that we have 30% of females still in school saying they're contemplating suicide school kids. That was never the case when I was in school, pretty much unheard of. And I've never heard of anybody committing suicide, never. And I'm not just in school that I attended, but I mean, you know, it would have been big news if it happened.

It was, uh, it was a thing in Japan because of all the pressure that they were under societal pressure. And now the pressure is being directed to kids from kindergarten on. And it's also, it's not just pressure to achieve academically like it is in Japan, but it's pressure to,

um, the focusing on the insecurities that kids have about their identity and their relationships with other people and about their sexuality and the changes that are going on in their body during puberty. All of that is being weaponized against kids. And yet, it's about guns. We've got to take the guns. Well, it's because political power comes out of the barrel of a gun, and they don't want

you to have any political power about that, even as a deterrent. You see, guns have been used to keep our government in line. Just as I was saying, Daniel Ellsberg said, oh, nuclear weapons have been used all the time. Nuclear weapons are being used right now. Guns are being used right now as a check against Biden and these other people. It's an implicit threat that is there.

It's the same way. It's mutual assured destruction. Don't go there. We don't want to have that. But of course, foolishly, you've had people like Eric Swalwell, had people like Beto O'Rourke, people like Joe Biden in this last election cycle say, no, we're going to take the guns. We're going to use the military. We're going to use nuclear weapons and planes and all this other kind of stuff against you

to take the guns. And so, first of all, they We're going to use nuclear weapons and planes and all this other kind of stuff against you to take the guns. And I said, well, first of all, they haven't learned anything, have they, about asymmetric warfare? Go back and look at what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yeah, you can take out a shoddy little military that is antiquated and small. You can take them out very quickly. But now the occupation begins. Now the asymmetric warfare begins. And that's why they got to get the guns. And so when you look at this, years ago, an interview with a woman who runs SSRIstories.net, an excellent website to go take a look at how SSRIs, the stories of how SSRIs have driven people to murder and to suicide. In some cases, both murder and suicide. And she has at the website, pull up the website, SSRIstories.net.

She has several quotes there. One of them, Dr. Pert, who was co-discoverer of SSRIs, said publicly in 1997 in a Time magazine interview, Dr. Pert said, I'm alarmed at the monster that Johns Hopkins neuroscientist Solomon Snyder and I created when we discovered this simple binding thing 25 years ago. Alarmed at it. And so at SSRIStories.net, they have a collection of over 5,000 news stories. All of these news stories,

they had verified the presence of an antidepressant in a perpetrator. It was verified by the testimony of family, friends, or autopsies and other things like that. 5,000 shootings, murders, suicides from these SSRI drugs. And she also has this. She says, the FDA has warned that any abrupt change in dose,

whether starting on increasing it or decreasing it or discontinuing the drug, skipping doses by forgetting or switching from one brand of antidepressant to another, where you're both abruptly decreasing one antidepressant or abruptly increasing the other one, all these can cause suicide, hostility, or psychosis. And when I interviewed her, I said, you know, she was describing that. I said, it kind of reminds me of what happens, because I got my certification as a scuba diver when I was younger,

and I said, it kind of reminds me of what happens to scuba divers, right? And they get the bins. You know, if you stay, as you stay underwater, the nitrogen begins to dissolve in your bloodstream. And so you have to leave yourself enough time on your tanks to decompress. You get every 33 feet, you get another atmosphere of pressure. So it builds up very, very quickly. You're under immense pressure when you start to dive. And so if you're down for a certain period of time, you have to come up a little bit and wait

as the nitrogen starts to come out of your bloodstream. It's been pushed in there by the pressure. If you come up, however, under emergency circumstances, or you come up, however, under emergency circumstances or you come up too quickly, that nitrogen just boils and bubbles out of your, you know, through your blood system. It gives you the bends and it can kill you. And so I said, it's really kind of what's happening with these people. They get onto this thing and with the SSRIs and they notice that it's affecting them in very negative ways, as most of these pharmaceutical drugs do. You know, they have these, here, take this for your condition, and then you find out that it's got all these adverse effects.

You don't like these adverse effects, so you stop taking it. Well, if you do that with the SSRIs, if you just start to cut it back, if you cut it back too quickly, it's like getting the bins. It all bubbles up and you have a catastrophic event, except what it does is it affects your mind. And this is what happens with this. Now, that is not what is involved in this particular situation, I think. I think this is a different kind of psychosis.

This is a psychosis that has been drummed into kids from kindergarten on. And of course, you know, they have their drugs as well, but this is a purely psychological thing that is being done. This is really a mind control tactic that's being done to our kids. And being done, ironically, to say, well, you know, these kids are going to be like that and so we've got to give them some counseling so they don't get suicidal and yet their drive their counseling and their pressure is what's driving kids to suicide and to murder and so when this news first broke yesterday uh it was like a woman shoots up this school.

And that doesn't fit. You know, it's typically men who do it. And then comes out. That's a Christian school. And the shooter is transgender and left behind a manifesto. Now, as of this morning, there's not any information been released by the police. Is it a manifesto or a wo-manifesto? They don't know.

They're too confused. That's good, Travis. Yeah, they really don't know. This is a female, and I always confuse myself. Is this a biological male who is dressed as a female because i identified this person as a female or is this a you know the other way around and it's the other way around because the um uh audrey hale has which is kind of a female name right pronouns are he and him and uh they you know on their social media profile this is a female to male

transgender 28 years old nashville police chief confirmed that audrey hale identifies as a transgender suggesting her trans identity motivated the killings we have a manifesto he said but we have not seen it yet i guess it's secret it's classified it's not going to go into the uh vaults at the pentagon because again the pentagon is all about lgbt they this could be an issue of national security because this is our core value this is what we fight for they've got top uh uh people working on it i guess yeah. Yeah, exactly. They're going to be analyzing it. Far-left extremists, says Andy, far-left extremists and militant trans activists are threatening to injure and to kill lawmakers in Tennessee

as revenge for the state banning the medical transitioning of minors. Their violent threats have surged in recent weeks. Now, he tweeted that out on the 26th, a day before this happened. I don't think that maybe it was a political thing. Maybe it was motivated by that. Maybe, and I don't know, if this individual went to that Christian school.

But certainly, it was a hate crime. But the shooter is now dead. My personal opinion on this is you had those two trans stories recently about the flight attendant that killed himself after being featured in those ads. And then that guy at TSA, it's like the agent punched me in the testicles. So those two stories basically back-to-back in a week, and then this happens. Yeah, they're victims. Yeah.

Yeah, that guy who dressed up as a girl and was encouraged to do all that and celebrated for doing all that by United Airlines. And they talked about, oh, the pressure on me. I have all this pressure, pressure, pressure, pressure and killed himself. That's what this is truly about. They're victims. They're victims of the people who say they're advocates. No, they're victims they're victims of the people who say they're they're advocates

no they're using them they're using them as a weapon against families against parents as a weapon against children as a weapon to tear our society down um again they're uh they're they're surrogates right they're the surrogates that are being used in this war against us uh just as your ukraine is using their people as surrogates in nato's war against russia the lgbt individuals are being victimized by these um their advocates if you will uh so this um woman who identified excuse, as a man entered the building by shooting through the door on one side. The doors were all locked. But unfortunately, they had no armed security. They had no armed teacher. The police got there very quickly, considering

it took them four minutes to get there. But of course, that's an eternity when somebody is shooting the place up. And so when they arrived, they engaged the shooter and killed him, her, whatever. It was a female who identified as a male. So they killed her and she had at least two assault rifles and a handgun. And the search of the home in Nashville revealed detailed maps, a manifesto of the attack. There was another school that had scoped out but decided not to because the security was heavier. And so when you look at this situation in Colorado in 2019, they had another female to male transgender mass shooter who went on a rampage together with her pro-LGBT friend

targeting students who had mocked her gender identity. So again, this is um you know norma bates uh this is where this is all going uh and one person who was um had a daughter at the school said i did not think it would ever happen to my school and i would like to see the guns off the street. This is a total non sequitur, frankly, the guns off the street. Again, SSRIs, psychological gaslighting, psychological abuse of children, driving them to murder and suicide, or the drugs driving them to murder and suicide. And yet, you know, the guns are not the reason why 30% of the girls want to commit suicide. Not because of guns. Never saw that ever in society. And so when you look at where this is all headed, it is, you now have, as a pushback

against guns, you have one confession by one of the gun control people said, well, look, you know, you got a large percentage of people in America who have assault weapons. Well, if that's the case, they're not being used that much, right? And if that's the case, if it's commonly owned, this is not an unusual weapon. And of course, the Supreme Court has said, well, you know, the Second Amendment protects all guns except for the ones that are really extreme or something like that. Well, there's nothing about that. There's no language about qualifying the protection of firearms in the Second Amendment. But if you wanted to go by what the Supreme Court says, then that would disqualify their obsession with getting rid of what they vaguely term as assault weapons.

You had Biden and his proclamations I mentioned at the beginning of the program. He says as a remark of respect for the victims of this senseless act of violence in Nashville, by the authority of the president, we're going to have all flags flown at half-staff. And that was it. Nothing about prayers, nothing like that. The governor of Tennessee, Bill Lee, did say, please join us in praying for the school, the congregation that's associated with that school. It's a church school.

And for the Nashville community. But what I found interesting interesting was at the very bottom so you have this paragraph saying we're going to fly all the flags and half staff and at the bottom it says and witness whereof i have here to set my hand this 27th day of march the year of our lord 2023 that's biden saying that i say that every day, you know, to honor the Lord Jesus Christ. And the fact that that's always been there in our legal documents, going back to the Mayflower, going back to the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, the year of our Lord. And now even Biden uses that as a template. I don't know when he's going to get rid of that.

And of our independence, the United States, the 247th year of our independence. Well, again, the focus on gun control is inevitable. You're going to see that. But we need to think about what we're going to do in this society. Already you've had a lot of threats made against, and of course Nashville is the state capital, a lot of threats by radical trainees.

We're going to get these politicians who decided that they're going to protect children from us. Yeah, yeah. Think about that. Think about how rapidly our society is deteriorating i mean going back i think first time i heard this transgender stuff was 2015 and uh somebody was covering it i said why don't you focus on uh i know it's a clickbait thing you know but look this is happening right now you know and um i never thought that this would yeah i was wrong i never thought that this would, yeah, I was wrong. I never thought that our country would go down.

I just thought it was too insane. And they are driving the kids insane. It's a deliberate program. And part of it is this war against, you know, understand, they're on a different side from this, and these people are filled with hate and resentment. They're going to be attacking christians literally quite frankly it is a religion and they believe that they are justified in killing you if you don't accept their religion if you believe that there is a better a better

pattern that has been given to us by god for sexual relationships for families and all the rest of stuff if you hold to that you are their enemy and they feel justified in killing you. Just as in other countries like Nigeria, you know, we talked about Nigeria and its CBDC experiment, but perhaps, you know, and I've talked about this in the past, but you need to understand that Boko Haram, the Fulani herdsmen and others are engaged with the help of that government who's trying to take away everybody's cash. But they're accessories to a, I guess you could call it a religious genocide. Genocide is coming against an ethnic group, but they're coming after Christians, murdering them. Just over the last month, 27 Christians in two attacks have been killed by these radical Islamic groups with the assistance

of the government. And the people have been, this has been happening for years. I reported this many times over the years. One individual there, president of the Area Community Development Association, where they had people killed in that province, said, I urge the government to match their words with action by arresting the perpetrators since the government knows them and knows where they are. And that has been the case for the longest time. And as we look at this, and there's been several attacks of people on churches because they hate the people in the churches, Christians. And in New York, you have one church that is fighting with Kathy Hochul and the Bruin decision from the Supreme Court. They said, no, actually, you can't prohibit people carrying a gun because that defeats the whole purpose of the Second Amendment. And so immediately in New York, as you know, we've talked about this many times, they decided that they would say, okay, well, we're not going to generally ban people from being able to carry guns, but we're going to say that you can't carry

them in any places that we designate as sensitive areas. And one of the areas, of course, that they designated as sensitive areas is a church. Pretty much any area where you would likely have a lot of people coming together and not being expected to be attacked, they have banned the use of firearms to protect people. Remember, there was no armed security at that church school. They had no armed security. They had no armed trained teachers either at that school. And so you have a church in New York fighting a legal battle with the state of New York to be able to defend itself with firearms. Lawyers for his Tabernacle Family Church, a non-denominational church about 140 miles southeast of Buffalo.

And they argued Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that New York's prohibition on firearms in houses of worship is unconstitutional. Lawyers for the First Liberty Institute that's representing them. So the Constitution protects the free exercise of religion and the right to bear arms in self-defense, and this New York law violates both. The Supreme Court has already issued an opinion on churches and their Second Amendment rights, and it is clear. Justice Clarence Thomas slammed the New York officials' efforts to suppress New Yorkers' Second Amendment rights, particularly outside their own homes. He said to confine the right to bear arms in the home would nullify half of the Second Amendment's operative protections.

Moreover, confining the right to bear arms to the home would make little sense, given that self-defense is the central component of the Second Amendment right itself. And again, the Constitution does not grant these rights. It recognizes our God-given rights. What the Second Amendment does is to prohibit the government from interfering with those God-given rights, just as the First Amendment, and all the first nine amendments,

are about stopping the government from interfering with individual rights that were given by God. So days after the Bruin Ruling, they put in their sweeping new laws designating things as sensitive places. Things like churches, schools, businesses. Places that are soft targets where you need to be able to defend yourself. Churches have increasingly been targets of hate, either because a criminal is anti-religious or simply looking for a place where he thinks no one will be armed. That was the situation in South Africa, a case that I've talked about many times. I did an interview with a guy who was there, wrote the book about it.

His name was Charles von Witt. And this is when the Marxists were in the process of taking over South Africa, as they are now in the process of taking over America. They were further along in the process. It was a shooting war that was going on. And after the Marxists took power, they had truth and reconciliation committee where they said, just tell us what you did and we'll let you go. And so these guys who attacked that church that day said, well, we picked it because

it was a soft target. It was in a liberal area. It was a big church, had about a thousand people. We didn't think anybody would have a weapon. And we had people shooting at us from all different directions and we left. But that wasn't what happened. God and his providence, and when I put that report up years ago, I put it up, one man with five bullets, just like David versus Goliath,

ran off these terraces. A bunch of them, they had automatic weapons. They had grenades. They opened up the side door up front, and they threw in grenades. They immediately killed about 50 people. He was in the back. And when I talked to him, he said, yeah, you know, as a Christian, I struggled as to whether or not I should have a gun and use force.

And I realized that, no, I have a duty to protect innocent life, including my own. And there was a lot of violent crime that was happening there. And so he thought about it, came to that conclusion, trained himself to use it. And he was just visiting that church that day. And so he was all the way in the back. They come in the front, hand grenades, machine guns. He stands up and takes out his gun

and takes one shot. And it's like, I'm never going to hit him from here. And so he was all the way in the back. He goes out the back door around the back side of the church and comes out another direction and takes another couple of shots at him. Yeah. Hit some wounded, some people there. Uh, they thought that they were under attack from multiple directions. And he found out later that very first shot that he fired did hit somebody. And so it's like, whoa, we're taking fire. They ran away. One guy with five bullets ran away a group of a half dozen or more. I forget how many there were, but it was a lot of them. They had fully automatic weapons, machine guns. They had planned on killing everybody in that church, and he stopped it. In 2019, a gunman opened fire at a West Freeway Church of Life in North Texas. An armed security guard targeted

and killed the perpetrator, although two churchgoers did die, along with the shooter. The loss of life, given a full building at a church could have been much higher. And the live stream video captured the shooting. Along with an interesting anecdote, if you look closely at the shooting, you will see many people in congregation drawing their weapons as well. We're talking about Texas here. They were going to defend their life. It was on.

And so they're ready to defend themselves. And that is their right. Very important right. And we have to continue to protect that, even though every time there is a shooting, they will not blame their psychological gaslighting and their manipulation and their attacks against kids, weaponizing sexuality against them, their demonic attacks against kids. They won't blame that.

They'll blame the gun. Everytown, again, I mentioned this earlier. I said, you look at what they put out, the president of Everytown. This is the Michael Bloomberg organization, gun control. He put out, his name's John Fineblatt, and he put out a piece about this saying, you know, one in four guns sold in the United States is a modern sporting rifle, what they call an assault rifle or whatever.

And so the person looked at this, uh, from bearing arms.com said to a, well, I think that that means that these arms are in common use. Then if one out of four are that they're not quote unusual weapons and his statistic that he begins with his, uh, statement there, they put on Twitter, uh, that first statistic puts modern sporting rifles clearly under the umbrella of

arms that are protected by the second amendment, according to the Supreme court's Heller decision in 2008. There, they made it clear that only those arms that are quote dangerous and unusual arms fall outside the scope of the second amendment and of course that's the way they've been trying to portray um ar-15s um what they call assault rifles or modern sporting rifles they've been trying to characterize them as dangerous and unusual but they're not because 25 percent of the purchases are those but again

that language that the Supreme Court used of dangerous and unusual is found nowhere in the Second Amendment and the Constitution either. So when we look at where this is all headed, it really comes back to what is being done to kids in school. Interestingly enough, one of these books that they gaslight the kids with, and I've seen this over and over again, I didn't know about the backstory of this book. I've seen it referenced over and over again. I am jazz. I am jazz. And I just kind of thought it was, well well we're going to improvise our sexual uh orientation here so i think a jazz i think about improv right um that's not what it is this is um uh a uh

jazz jennings who supportedly purportedly declared himself to be transgender and wrote a book at five years old do you believe that you believe that travis I don't think so. I think he's being coached or something. This sounds a lot like Greta Thunberg to me. Anyway, at five years old, he decides that he's a transgender and he writes a book about it, I Am Jazz. It champions his story of transitioning to becoming a female. And they're using this everywhere, against little kids in kindergarten. But now 16 years later, at the age of 21, Jazz Jennings says that he is gender, he is confused somewhat about his transition. He said he's had numerous rounds of hormone treatment

and sex change surgeries, and then said this, quote, I really want to understand myself. He admits that he is, quote, breaking down and, quote, spiraling into negativity. How many times do we see this? People who have been mutilated as children, and as they're getting older, they realize that they've been used. They've been used to validate the sexual fantasies of someone. They've been used for a political agenda, but they've been used no matter what. His story adds to a growing body of evidence that affirms that so-called gender-affirming care does not provide long-lasting benefits, does not improve mental health, says LifeSite News.

Consider the stories of detransitioners such as Chloe Cole, who has spoken quite a bit. We've covered her story, giving testimony. She testified to the anguish that she felt and now faces because a medical professional operated on her breasts. She'll never be able to breastfeed. Evidently, they didn't sterilize her, though. A National Institute of Health study also recently revealed that at least two participants who were taking hormone interventions, committed suicide while they were taking the gender-affirming care. Anyway, Chloe Cole said, I realized the beauty of motherhood was stolen from me

by medical professionals who my family entrusted me to. A child does not, in fact, know who they are at 12 years old. I realized that I wanted to be what I always was and forever will be, and that is a woman. It almost killed me as it has killed many who regret transition. And who are the ones who are pushing these young children into this? I played this clip last week, but it's a short clip. This is the guy who calls himself Rachel Levine, who has been celebrated by the Biden administration. This is a few years before he got appointed in that position, and he was talking about the fact that he transitioned late in life,

and the interviewer asked him if he regretted having waited that long to transition. And here is what Dick Levine had to say. But I have no regrets because if I transitioned when I was young, I wouldn't have my children. I can't imagine a life without my children. And so every experience led me to here. And so how could I me to here. And,

um, and so how could I regret that? Yeah. Yeah. But he wants to take that away from young kids. Uh, jazz Jennings is still trying to deal with us at the age of 21 after supposedly writing a book about it at five years old.

Don't believe any of this stuff. It's all a satanic lie. And as I said before, they feel justified. It's one of the reasons why we need to think about how we're going to protect schools and churches. You ought to always have somebody there who is designated as Kerry. And, um, you know, it's what I see in the churches that I go to, uh, professor says killing right-wing speakers is admirable and the blowback is immediate. Well, not really.

The only thing that happened was this professor was suspended with pay. With pay. They didn't kick him out of school. This was at Wayne State University. And the professor said in a facebook post said it's more admirable to kill a right-wing speaker than it is to shout them down on a college campus because they've been they've had several situations where now the intolerance and i've read the polls to you when they talk to the young kids who are being raised to be hateful and intolerant. And the majority of them say it's okay to shout down a speaker that you disagree with.

And it's getting close to majority of them say it's okay to use violence. And this professor, you know, which is why these kids think this way. This professor says it's far more admirable to kill a racist, a homophobic, or a transphobic speaker than it is to shout them down. When right-wing groups invite such speakers to campus, it's precisely because they want to provoke an incident that discredits the left. Well, maybe it's because universities were used to debate ideas. There will be no debate with these fascists. They are the true fascists.

They are the true authoritarians. We did not provoke them. They changed everything. We're not even allowed to talk about what they changed. We must celebrate and bow down and worship. That is our responsibility. Otherwise, we should shut up because they are our superiors. He cited the assassination of Ukrainian People's Republic Simon Petrua, who was assassinated in

1926 out of revenge for the deaths of thousands of Jewish people. So he was very serious about this. This wasn't just an off-the-hand remark. Oh yeah. We're to, you know, we're to kill these people. No, no, no. He's, he's making an argument from history. He's very rational about it.

And the weak response from the college is to suspend him for a couple of weeks with pay here, have a vacation. Trans people are facing horrifying rhetoric at state houses. This is from a couple of weeks ago as they were lining up these bills to stop the mutilation of children. And, you know, that's now passed in Tennessee and some other places. And this was put out by the Associated Press. And look at how they are portraying these people as victims.

The people that you're not allowed to criticize. The people that you're not allowed to criticize, the people that you're not allowed to disagree with. And if you do, college professors say they are justified to kill you. And the Associated Press is making them victims as well. Well, why are they a victim? And if I have a different opinion because of my religion, if I have a different opinion because I understand the difference between adults and children, and that children can't make these kinds of decisions. I'm not allowed to have those opinions.

I'm not allowed to say anything about it. It was pharmacist Gwendolyn Herzig's first time testifying before a legislative committee. Herzig, who is transgender, spoke out against the legislation, told the panel that one of the biggest obstacles trans people face is a lack of empathy. Only a few minutes later, a Republican lawmaker asked her an inappropriate

question about her genitalia. It was horrifying, he said. He said. They say she said. That's AP. In South Dakota, a lawmaker invoked furries, people who dress up as animals, when talking about gender-affirming care.

In Montana, a legislator compared parents supporting their children in finding treatment for asking doctors to carry out medically-assisted suicide. See, the AP is saying you don't have any justification to oppose any of this stuff, to ask any questions about it. It has to be opposed against children. You have AOC's rant against parental rights. Shows the pro-LGBT left really is after your kids, says LifeSite News.

And the war between America's parents and progressives. No, they're not progressives. They're the Sodom-go-Marxist mob. Marxists who use the sexual gaslighting of children as a way to disrupt and to invert society. The Parental Rights Act would require public school districts to be transparent, publicly posting details of the curriculum being taught to students.

Well, I see this, frankly, as a Band-Aid. to be transparent, publicly posting details of the curriculum being taught to students. Well, I see this, frankly, as a band-aid. You know, yesterday I talked to the CEO of the Freedom Project Academy about this very thing. And the fact is that, you know, you can have complete control, complete transparency if you take over your child's education. I mean, even if you go to a private school or a charter school or something, you still don't know who the teachers are. You still don't know what they're doing in your class. If you teach them yourself, if you do something like that academy, you can watch all of the lessons. They're there as an archive. All of it is is recorded You can see all the resources that the kids are doing

And of course if you're doing all the teaching yourself You know what that is This is being put out As a band-aid by the Republicans Who ought to be focused on Defunding the Department of Education That's what we're talking about The Department of Education has always been

About disrupting parental rights And disrupting education It's always been about theing parental rights and disrupting education. It's always been about the deliberate dumbing down of America and about things like Common Core, from Common Core to critical race theory and all the rest of the stuff that we're talking about. And so the Republicans should be talking about defunding the Department of Education. Ronald Reagan ran on that. It was less than two years old when he took office. But he didn't stop it.

He grew it. And Republicans have continued to grow it as well. And we have to be careful. And this is an analogy for the presidential elections as well. When the presidency has gone so far outside of its constitutional boundaries, as well as all the rest of the federal government, we should not be so naive as to think that it really matters who is president. As a matter of fact, when we get somebody who is going to more directly attack us,

as Biden is doing, Let me ask you this. How does it make you feel when Biden decides that he's going to ban gas stoves and air conditioners and cars and all the rest of this stuff? What if you've got a president there who says that he wants to defend that, but he allows the regulators to go ahead and kill those things in a death by a thousand cuts. Maybe it's better for us to be told, this is what I'm going to do, and start preparing for it, rather than being assuaged about all this. Rather than being told, Trump's in charge. It's 4-D chess.

Stand down. He's got it, right? We need to understand who the real enemies are. And when the Democrats are there, you understand who the real enemies are. I'm not saying vote for Democrats, but I'm saying that this whole fear, but if the other guy gets in, he's going to be even worse. He'll try to move things faster and that may wake people up. And it brings this thing to a head. Let's bring it to a head. Let's confront our enemies. Let's understand what their agenda is and let's confront it. Bring it on, I say from that standpoint. But what the Republicans

are doing is they're putting band-aids there. Oh, they're coming after your kids. Well, let's pass a bill, Kevin McCarthy says. It'll have five pillars. Parents will have a right to a voice in their kids' education. They'll have a right to know what's being taught in schools. They'll have a right to be heard. They'll have a right to see what the school budget is, and they'll have a right to be updated on any violent activity in school. So we don't have any of those things now if you put your kids in school, right? You've abandoned them to the state as soon as you drop them off. And loco parentis is the legal doctrine of that court decisions have said. And so you don't have a right to have a voice in education or know what's being

taught or to see the budget or to, to have any voice in any of this stuff right now, because you've abandoned your kids to the state. If you put them in a government school or you've abandoned them to a charter school or a private school or something, you've got to take control of what's happening with your kids. It's just that simple. That is the fundamental thing that is destroying our nation right now.

When the hearts of the parents are turned to the kids, to their children, that is a point at which revival of that nation happens. God honors that, but it's also a practical indicator of the attitude of people that is going to build a nation rather than level it to the ground. And so in response to this, AOC says Republican parental rights bill is fascism. No, the schools are fascist. The schools are dictatorial. The schools are authoritarian government at its finest, at its peak. And they say this in the LifeSite News.

They said it's far closer to fascism to insist that the state has the right to teach state dogmas to children against the will of their parents. Well, schools will always do that. And we have to understand that schools are not the same as education. Can we understand that when we've got, you know, 33 schools where not a single child is reading at grade level in Chicago? Just in Chicago. And then we've got, maybe it was Illinois. I think it was Chicago.

It might have been the entire state. But anyway, it got 55 or so that nobody can do math at grade level. Schools do not equal education. Those are different things. One is an institution. The other one is a set of learning skills, the tools to learn, and critical thinking, and the rest of this stuff. It's not even a collection of facts.

It's an ability. That's one of the reasons why they look at the ability to read or to do math, because those are tools of learning. And so we have to understand that in many ways, the Republicans are trying to normalize, the conservatives are trying to normalize this system of oppression. This will never be friendly to parents. It will always,

but we have this fantasy that if we can just tell them that they've got to listen to parents, they will listen to parents. They'll never going to listen to parents. You shouldn't have to speak to them. You should be taking care of your kids directly. And again, that doesn't mean that you have to sit there every hour of the day. You can off-source some of this to other people. You still have to keep an eye on what they are doing to know what is happening. That's your job as a parent. God has entrusted these children to you, and that is your job as a parent, to see what is being done to your kids. You don't hand them off

to strangers. You don't let them talk to strangers, especially when these strangers are known to be pedophiles and groomers in many cases. You're playing Russian roulette with your kids if you put them in a government school. Look at the, I don't understand how people, but anyway, this is, this article from the New American gets it absolutely right. Absolutely right. Bills in Congress would expand federal meddling in education. How? By throwing money at people.

Education savings accounts. Hey, folks, it's a trap. Listen to General Akbar or whatever. It is a trap. ESAs, education savings accounts, are special accounts used by the government to get parents, quote, public funds, to get their children out of government-run

public or charter schools and either place them in a private school or homeschool them. There's a lot of big money in this in the Republican Party. Mark Hall's excellent documentary, Killing Ed, talks about how Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick and others are heavily involved with this Islamic group run by Fatala Gulen. It's an Islamic cult. He's got over a thousand schools when he did this documentary five or six years ago.

Fatala Gulen had over a thousand schools. And everywhere but the United States, they operated as religious madrasas. But in the United States, they tried to pretend otherwise. And they have played a lot of, uh, games to get the money. And you have to understand that. Uh, and of course the people like Dan Patrick and other Republicans have been sent on junkets to Turkey, uh, before there was this break with fatality, Lynn and Erdogan.

That's one of the issues with it. They've gotten probably now it's probably over a billion dollars. Last time I talked to him, it's getting close to a billion dollars. They have several dozen of these schools. They label them as schools of science and math. But there are also big American corporations that are making a lot of money off of these vouchers. And that's why this is being pushed through.

And if you take that money to homeschool, uh, it is a trap. If ever there was one, I've had this discussion going back in the early 1990s, um, with other homeschoolers on the time, they didn't have Facebook, but there's message boards about that. And at the time, what they wanted was they wanted certain things from the government. We want to have a sports program or something like that. I said, don't take a penny from them because along with that,

there's going to be strings attached. Guess what? Oh, you're in the sports system? Oh, well, maybe you're going to have to have a vaccination. We're going to cut your money off, that type of thing. So, says the New American, the problem with these bills is that they would further entangle the federal government unconstitutionally in education and potentially threaten educational freedom by shackling parents and religious schools to government funding and the various strings that are attached.

And those strings are going to be attached in terms of what you teach them, how you teach them, all this diversity, inclusivity, equity, the curriculum. It's all going to be there. The School Act of 2023 would allow federal education funds to follow the student. And another bill called the Children Have Opportunities in Classrooms Everywhere Act. These bills would allow 529 plans currently used for college expenses to be used for elementary and secondary school expenses, including private and in-home schools, and requires federal funding to be used for

such plans. All of this will come with massive strings and supervision attached. I guarantee you. I guarantee you. It's always the money. It's always the way they do this stuff. And this is why from the very beginning I called out Trump on the lockdowns. I said, yeah, he's funding it.

He's giving the money to the governors. The governors are accountable to him. If he doesn't like it, he's going to pull it back. And that's what they will do to you. They'll get you hooked on this stuff, and then they'll pull it back. You don't need to have a lot of money to educate a kid at home. You really don't. It takes time, but the time that you spend with your kids is going to,

when you look back on your life, it's going to be the best time that you had. You won't regret that. Everybody on their deathbed says, well, I wish I had spent more time with my family. Well, do it. Do it. Do it while they're young. You're not going to regret it. These bills might sound good, says the New American, but they actually represent a major

and potentially disastrous expansion of federal meddling in private schools and home schools, home education. The U.S. Constitution doesn't give the federal government any role in education. The 10th Amendment affirms that the education policy lies with the states and the people and the parents and the parents. It is the parents who need to take this responsibility. And the reason why we're suffering under this oppressive government that has intruded into every aspect of our life is because we've invited it to pay for every aspect of our life. We want its money. And the love of federal money has been the root of all evil in society, as we were warned. So when the the federal government uses taxpayers' money to pay for private home schools, it can easily attach strings to such funding, and people become dependent on federal funds.

I've said this over and over again. I'm glad to see this on The New American. It's always the government's goal. The government is not there to help you. The government is there to make you dependent upon it. Oh, and they point out in this article, this has also been the stated policy of the UN. The UN has an educational agency, UNESCO.

UNESCO has advocated for subsidizing private schools with tax money. Why? In order to control them, their stated purpose. Yeah. The powers that are not delegated to the federal government, so the 10th Amendment, are reserved to the states and to the people. Don't share your heritage.

Rather, don't give up your heritage for a simple little voucher. We'll be right back. Joe, we've got a problem. What? Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right? So, basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because, basically, you can't hold coffee with your hands, right? I'm a scatling, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm be ready for it.

You dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we own the world. These people, they're supporting free speech with every month they buy. Come on. These people,

I tell you, will anyway. You're listening to The David Knight Show. And I wanted to thank some of the people who have sent us contributions by mail. You'll find the mail address, P.O. Box, at thedavidknightshow.com, as well as other places if you would like to support the program.

It is voluntary, and we do appreciate the people who have stepped up and helped us. We really do appreciate that, And I wanted to acknowledge this and I'm not sure if I mentioned this. Um, I had split it up into two groups last week and I don't know if I got to the second group or not. So I'd rather say thank you twice than to not say thank you. Uh, let me just give a quick shout out and, um, I think Martin T, Tina and Mike G, William B, Jack D, Lois L, Damon P, and Jeremy W. Thank you, all of you, for the support that you gave us. And we have right now, I think it's been updated this morning, but I'm not sure. Right now, the gas gauge is at 75%. So really do appreciate the support that everyone has given us. Let's talk a little bit about, well, let's go

with climate here and talk about, of course, the new rules on air conditioners. I've talked about this very quickly, but as they're pointing out, this is something that's going to hurt low-income households. It's not going to, the rich will always have their air conditioning. As Obama said, you know, when he went to Africa, y'all can't have air conditioning. That's for people like me, right? And I can build and buy a mansion right on the seashore where they say it's going to be underwater if their climate predictions are accurate, but I don't believe that stuff. Anyway, uh, the rules for air conditioners and for air cleaners, rather, for air cleaners, they've got some new rules coming in over the next 12 months.

Rules for air conditioners will begin in 2026. So get your air conditioning now. The new rules are anticipated to cost manufacturers about $82 million to implement. Why? For what? For nonsense. Absolute nonsense. the climate MacGuffin, oh, we're all going to die. If, uh, if your air conditioning operates the way that's

been operating for decades. So this is all to make the products too expensive to afford. That's the way this all begins. Right. The way it began with cars and eventually they just say, well, y'all can't have air conditioning. Only the really rich can have air conditioning. This is the kind of soft banning that we've seen over and over again.

As one person said, you're getting to the point where clothes washers, for example, he says this might be the fifth time that they've upped the regulations. Let's see, how did Fauci say? You do it with disruption, you do it from the inside and you do it iteratively. That's the way they want to make this all poor. A manager with a group called Rocky Mountain Institute told the news outlets in January, the study does not assume or estimate a causal relationship when you're talking about gas stoves and ovens. You know, the narrative at that time was, oh, kids are going to get childhood asthma. Total nonsense. Absol nonsense absolute nonsense and so now they got to make it since that didn't fly they got to make it

about saving the environment from carbon dioxide or whatever gas they're worried about now a study does not assume or estimate a causal relationship with asthma childhood asthma only reports on a population level reflection of the relative risk given to what we know about exposure or risk factor. Look, don't make this rookie mistake. Don't argue with him over their studies. This is, they don't have any authority to do this, first of all. Okay? You can argue with him at some level about their nonsense climate McGovern,

but when it comes to stuff like banning gas stoves and, you know, regulating washing machines and air conditioning and cars and all this other kind of stuff out of existence, they don't have the authority for these agencies to do what they're doing. There's no authority for the agency and there's no authority for what they're doing. It's like the ATF. They have no authority to kill the Second Amendment by a death by a thousand cuts. That's called infringement. Every one of those is prohibited by the, explicitly prohibited by the Constitution. And of course, all the rest of this stuff is prohibited by the Tenth Amendment. If you don't have, you know, if there's nothing in the Constitution that says that the job

of the federal government is to protect our air or our climate, well, they don't have the authority to create an agency to do that. Richard Nixon violated the constitution with the EPA. He violated it with the department of energy, which is now trying to, you know, um, uh, outlaw these appliances because they use too much energy and so forth. Just like they don't have the authority for the department of education. And I saw this article on children's health defense and, you know, for the last two or three years, uh,

RFK juniors organization has been stellar. I always have been in terms of opposing childhood vaccine, but my problem prior to the, you know, the Trump pandemic was always about their cheerleading of the environment, because that has always been a big MacGuffin. And it still remains the big elephant in the room when you talk about RFK Jr. This is what I think is really dangerous about him. It's the fact that they really do believe this nonsense. And so there was an article on children's health defense, how the environmental movement can find its soul again and transform civilization.

This person, when it says how the environmental movement can find its soul again, they are selling you the Gaia religion in this article from Children's Health Defense. And when they talk about transforming civilization, they're talking about depopulation. It's very simple. A central theme of my book, says the writer of this Children's Health Defense article, a central theme of my book on climate is that if we are to focus our attention on a single substance, it should not be carbon dioxide, but it should be water. Beyond greenhouse effects, water is crucial in the ways that the world maintains conditions for life to thrive.

Well, now we're talking about the general thing. And now here we do talk about their insanity. You know, if it's the government coming out and saying, well, you know, we're all going to die from climate change, therefore I'm going to do this and this and that, you say, well, what's your constitutional authority to do this, this and this? Oh, that's right, you have none. I don't really care what your opinions are.

But we do need to be concerned about the opinions of the public. And so he goes on with this and he says, Earth is best understood as a living being. This is the Gaia theory being told. This is what I saw when our kids were little at the Children's Museum in London, running this propaganda loop where the kids were playing. So it's coming in subconsciously with him all the time.

It's a complex living being. It has a complex physiology, says Children's Health Defense Fund, whose health depends on the health of her constituent organs. Her organs are the forests, the wetlands, the grasslands, the estuaries, the reefs, the apex predators, the keystone species, the soil, the insects, and indeed every intact ecosystem and every species on earth. And if we continue to degrade them, drain them, cut them, poison them, pave them, and kill them, earth will die a death of a million cuts.

She will die of organ failure, regardless of the levels of greenhouse gas. So, the Earth is a living, sentient being. It has a complex physiology. And I don't know, I guess we're doing like gender-affirming care on her or something, you know? We're removing her organs, and we must not do that to mother earth see rfk jr has sold this kind of tripe for a long time i'm glad that he's telling people the truth about the vaccines and he's been a

staunch supporter of that but he truly is a he is a true believer of this pagan religion. And that's a very dangerous thing. I would not support him for president third party or otherwise. Um, so, you know, you're going to push this climate MacGuffin like this and it, and it doesn't end there. I'll just read you another quick, uh, quote about this. Um, you know, mother earth, he says floods he says floods droughts fires anomalous heat cold wet and dry at the wrong times of years that will intensify even in the absence of significant

global warming and such is already the case and i'm sure that you've noticed well no i haven't actually i've noticed the media saying that i've noticed you saying that sir, but I haven't seen it in actuality. I've seen it debunked Actual measurement show that you want to tell us that you got more hurricanes this last year really? Name them please name them. They've all got names. You should be able to name them right one you had one this last year Just amazing to me. Look, this is fundamentally a religion. They picked the Greek goddess Gaia. They tell you that it's a living, sentient being, and it's going to, you know,

and people are a virus and all the rest of this stuff. Look, we are not the problem, except for the fact that we're not exercising our dominion. Our dominion, you know, you talk about all these Christian nationalists and everything. No, what we have our dominion is we are imaging God's dominion over earth. God created us, male and female. Let them rule over the earth and the animals in the earth that I have created. They will represent me. They will take dominion over this. They will take care of it and they will be responsible for it. And when they do the wrong

thing, just like a president does the wrong thing, then there's going to be consequences for those who are under his authority, under his headship. That's the principle. We have abdicated our headship. We have abdicated our stewardship. And that's what's wrong. And so then you see this article from LifeSite, which I was kind of surprised. It was a reprint actually from an organization called America Out Loud. A guy said, the guy who wrote it said, a couple of weeks ago, I was invited to speak to the campaign Life Coalition Ottawa about climate change. And he said the title of the event was Why Global Warming Alarmism is a Threat to Unborn Children and to the Pro-Life Movement. And this was an epiphany to him.

It's like, how could this be an epiphany to you? Because we are a virus, according to these people. Overpopulation was what Paul Ehrlich began this whole nonsense movement with, Earth Day and all the rest of the stuff. He was all about depopulation. The population bomb was what the book that he wrote. And he's been saying we got too many people, we got to kill people one way or the other. A lot of these people very explicitly say, well, you know, we could sterilize people,

but the best way to get rid of a lot of people real quickly is with war. These, it is a satanic religion that hates humanity and seeks to kill us. He says, in preparation for the event, I researched whether climate activist groups had anything to say about abortion, and I was surprised to see that they do.

Indeed, while their position is usually cloaked in supposed respect for women's rights, many of these groups strongly support abortion, and it's clear that their drive for depopulation is the major reason for it. And so he talks about um michael brune who was a sierra club executive director back in 2017 was interviewed by tucker and brune or brune i don't know how you pronounce his name said well it helps to address the number of people that we have on this planet and we feel that one of the

ways in which we can get to sustainable population is to empower women to make choices about their own families. Bingo. Again, it has always been about depopulation, whether it's voluntary or whether it is forced, that has always been the central thing. He says, well, they want abortion because they want fewer people on earth. They want the transgender LGBT stuff for the same reason. That's another way to make sure there's no kids, right? Mutilate the children before they have kids like Dick Levine did. So this has always been a part of it. We need to understand the water that we're swimming in, if you wish.

EU and Germany reach a deal on combustion engines ban. And what's the deal? Well, we'll let the wealthy have it, but the rest of you can't have it, right? Because they're going to have to have e-fuels. They're going to have to have some very complicated systems on these vehicles that are going to identify whether or not it is an e-fuel.

The whole thing is going to be incredibly expensive, so it's only going to be for a few people to have it, like everything else. They want to push you off of the earth if they can't kill you. They want to confine you in a smart city. It's just that simple. Allow new vehicles with combustion engines to be registered even after 2035 if they use the climate-neutral fuel. Again, it is incredibly expensive to create.

They're going to make it with windmill power down at the tip of South America. It's going to be reclaimed carbon dioxide, and then there's going to be special devices on these Porsches and these Lamborghinis to make sure that you're not using anything other than this e-fuel. Yeah, it is absolutely amazing, but it's what we've seen over and over again. These people are going to own everything. They will control everything.

And we need to understand where this is all headed. Because if we're just going along and reacting to one thing after the other, by the time we react to them taking away a gas oven, you don't realize where this is fully going. And you can't stop this thing by piecemeal. The only way you're going to stop it is if you understand that they desire to monopolize and control everything, including you.

Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. Hear, hear! It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else. ¶¶ liberty it's your move you're listening to the david knight show all right welcome back and uh before i get into just some general news

a lot of different topics here i want to respond to a couple of comments on rumble i'm glad people have found us on rumble uh from, from Donald dumpster. Thank you for the tip. He says, I recently discovered a vaccine that will make you worship transsexuals, which I will introduce as operation warp speed 2.0, uh, support the dump. Daniel's ticket. There you go. Uh, that's, uh, I guess we could call it a warped sexuality, operation, warped sexuality, maybe, uh, also on rumble.

Thank you for the tip from YJ72. So the story about the five-year-old author, you know, Jazz Jennings, reminded me of Lala Harris, who had a story when she was a toddler telling her mom that she wanted freedom. Yeah, right? He said, yeah, my dog requested a steak dinner. They really think we're that stupid. Yeah, they do. When satire becomes reality, by the way, nearly 100 Babylon Bee stories have. As a matter of fact, they never gaslighted anybody about the pandemic, about Trump, about the jabs, or about January the 6th. Babylon Bee didn't do that. And they were right more times. A hundred joke headlines turned into prophecies that came true, and many of them happened pretty quickly.

They said, for example, to improve public perception, Lala Harris is taking likability lessons from Hillary Clinton. That was in July of 2021. And he said, so who would take likability lessons from Hillary Clinton? And he goes, and yet, this is the CEO of Babylon Bee, Dylan, this interview with him. He said, and yet, a month later, there was a real story that the Harris staff reached out to

Hillary's staff to make her more likable. You're scraping the bottom of the barrel when that happens, right? And why is the staff reaching out? Because the staff has complained about working for Lala Harris and how difficult she is to work for. And he says, we even did one about Trump.

Had claimed to have done more for Christianity than Jesus himself, and that one went crazy viral. And then in 2021, then President Trump said during an interview that, quote, nobody has done more for Christianity or for evangelicals or for religion itself than I have done. He said the headline for the story two years earlier on the Babylon Bee 2019 was, Trump, I have done more for Christianity than Jesus.

And by the way, the left fact-checked that and found that it was actually false. Then two years later, he actually said it. He said he's done more for Christianity than anybody else in history. As a matter of fact, he's done more for religion than anyone else in history. Well, he has created a cult. I have to say that. He could make the case that he's got more followers than Jesus. That was a case that John Lennon tried to make.

That might actually be true here in the United States. In September 2022, the Bee joked about the economy with a headline, Nine Reasons Not to Worry About the Tanking Economy. Two days later, the Washington Post published the headline, Seven Ways Recession Could Be Good for You Financially. We're living in really crazy times, really insane times. He says, so yeah, we're just baffled by it. He said, we did a joke during the pandemic about how pants sales were plummeting because everybody was working from home.

And he said, citing a March 2020 example, he said, and it was just this picture of a guy sitting there in his pink boxers, but he's got a really nice dress shirt on at his desk. He said the very next day there was a story about how Walmart was seeing an increased sales of tops, but not bottoms. Just for the record, I am not doing an anchorman thing here. I am wearing pants as I'm doing the news here. CNN, by the way, and this is not a satire. This is not a satire. CNN is accusing white people of digital blackface if you use a meme or a gif or something that's got a black person in it.

You're not allowed to do that. That's misappropriation, right? Well, what about all these guys who are. That's misappropriation, right? Well, what about all these guys who are misappropriating being a woman, right? Isn't that gender misappropriation? Do they care about that? You know, hey, I'm going to take over your identity. As a matter of fact, I'm going to be so celebrated that I will be, I'll pretend that I'm a woman through gender misappropriation, and I will be praised and fed and I will win all the competitions because I am a guy competing against women, uh, in sports. And, um, I will be the

woman of the year and all the rest of this stuff, you know, because you look at Dick Levine, he couldn't win any events in terms of sporting stuff, but he could be declared the woman of the year and the first woman admiral and all this other kind of stuff and not even a woman. Uh, so yeah. What about, uh, CNN is not worried about Elizabeth Warren anymore. Well, they never were worried about Elizabeth Warren and her cultural misappropriation. You know, everybody in America as a, you know, if you go back and look at people's DNA, you can find a certain percentage of Indian DNA or black DNA and white Europeans. Uh,

and she had half of what the average white American had in terms of Indian DNA. And it was a babble of B story that, uh, when that came out and she was slammed, dunked by DNA test, when that story came out, Babylon B satire was. Uh, Hillary Clinton says there is no truth to the fact that, um, she is half alien DNA and she says much less alien DNA in her. And so I covered that story and I actually put out a little clip where I talked about the Babylon because that was early days and nobody knew about the Babylon B yet, but I thought it was really funny. And so I got, uh, fact-checked by the daily beast. And they said that I was

saying that Hillary Clinton had lizard alien DNA. They can't take a joke. Okay. Um, extreme joy, annoyance, anger, and occasions for drama and gossip are a magnet for images of black people, especially black females. And so CNN says, if you do that, you're guilty of digital blackface. Wow. You know, we just had a guy, they kicked Nicola Sturgeon out. Or is it Spurgeon?

I don't know. Sturgeon, Spurgeon. She was the prime minister of Scotland. And she got into this back and forth about trannies because she was trying to defend the practice of putting male rapists in with women. Because after the fact, and after their conviction, they decided that they were females. And there were a couple of those. And she's, you know, trying to tow the globalist political line about trainees and all the rest of this nonsense and so they one reporter asked her relentlessly about this question and she could

not explain it it was really bad and so they had her step down but of course you know the way this works is that they don't call another election and the same party is still in power they choose someone else from amongst their ranks and the scottish national party is a very leftist marxist lgbt type of organization that's why what took her down and so they were looking at a replacement and uh the one of the candidates who was leading candidates two leading candidates one of them was a female christian they didn't like the fact that she had traditional christian views of uh marriage and that she was pro-life and so she narrowly lost to a radical member who is now going to institute the same policies that got Nicola kicked out. And beyond that, the guy is a raging racist.

Listen to the hate that he has for white people and understand the fact that Scotland is 96% white. This is the guy. He's a radical leftist Muslim, and he has pushed for hate speech laws that would make it a crime to say something hateful even in your own home in conversation if somebody ratted you out, hit you with fines, imprisonment. And so this anti-free speech guy is also a very hateful, racist bigot.

Listen to him talking about the fact that there's too many white people in government in Scotland, where the country is 96% white. Here is the new Muslim Prime Minister of Scotland. And to my colleagues on the government bench, we know that we are not immune either. Some people were surprised. They were taken aback even by the mention on my social media that 99% of the meetings I go to, I'm the only non-white person. Because you're in Scotland, idiot. But why are we so surprised when the most senior positions in Scotland are filled almost ydym ni'n rhyddid pan mae'r sefydliadau mwyaf yng Nghymru yn cael eu llenwi'n eithaf yn unigol gan y bobl sy'n Gwyd? Dynwch fy nheulu fy hun.

Y Prif Weinidog? Gwyd. Y Prif Gyfrifol? Gwyd. I bob arweinydd yn y cyhoedd? Gwyd. Y Prif Gwrddwyr? Gwyd. Y Prif Gyngor? Gwyd. Y Prif Gyngor? Gwyd. I bob Prif Gyngor? Gwyd. I bob Prif Cyngor-Gynorthwy? Gwyd. Y Prif Gyngor-G blwch. I bob Prif Gyngor, yn blwch. I bob Prif Gynorthwy, yn blwch.

I bob Prif Gweinidog, yn blwch. I bob Prif Cyngor, yn blwch. I bob Prif Cyngor, yn blwch. I bob Prif Gwyddon, yn blwch. A nid dim ond ymddiriedaeth. Y Prif Swyddog Meddwl, yn blwch. Y Prif Swyddog Nyrsio, yn blwch. Y Prif Swyddog Gwyddon, yn blwch.

Y Prif Swyddog Gwaith Gwyddon, yn blwch. Yn ymlaen, mae pob diogelu yn y wlad yma, cymryd rhan o bobl sy'n llywodraethol. Yn y Llywodraeth yng Nghymru, mae pob Cyfarwyddwr Genedlaethol yn llywodraethol. Mae pob Cyngor o bob cyrff cyhoeddus yn llywodraethol. Nid yw hynny'n ddigon dda. Nid wyf yn ystyried, os ydw i wedi edrych ar y sector prifat, bod pobl ethnol a chymorol yn armryd ar lefelau gynharach.

Mae hyn yn ffail cyd-destunol ar bob un ohonom. Felly, rwy'n gobeithio y byddwn ni'n seilio'n ddifrifol, oherwydd dyna ddylai fod yn gwirionedd ddifrifol i ni i gyd. Felly, peidiwch â twitio'r faterion o ddynion, peidiwch â postio, neu post or don't just post a hashtag. Don't just take the knee. As people of color, we don't need your gestures. Yes, solidarity is helpful, but what we need from you is action and for you to be anti-racist by your deeds. Don't just tell us how you are not a racist. I take that as a bare minimum.

He is a racist. You must be anti-racist. You must be anti-racist. You must be anti-racist. What he means by that is you must be anti-white. We don't need your hashtags. We need your handouts. Yeah. Give it to me.

Give it. That guy, that's one of the most hateful racist speeches I've ever heard by a politician. He goes to all-white Scotland and complains about the fact they're all white, but he's got a remedy for that. They do throughout Europe and that's the great replacement. They can, you know, ship in people from other parts of the world like him and I take over the

country like him and kick the white people out, at least make them so ashamed of themselves that they're afraid to do anything other than cower in their homes because you know they're white and it's not okay to be white i'm just william wallace yeah or robert the bruce uh it's the same it's amazing isn't it how they have been able to make people ashamed of their and i saw the same thing happening uh the same tactic has been used over and over again by the globalists, making people ashamed of who they are, ashamed of their country to take this down. This is a Marxist tactic.

It truly is amazing. Anyway, the guy is a dyed-in-the-wool Marxist. It's not enough to not be racist. You've got to be anti-white is what he's saying. That's what all that means. By the way, you know, we talk about the lunacy of the government, the lunacy of our medical systems, the lunacy of the drug war and the lunacy of government. Here's a good example. A couple of pregnant women had child protective services stuck on them by the state of New Jersey. They made two mistakes. First one was living in New Jersey.

The second mistake was on the way to giving birth, they had poppy seed bagels. And then when they get there, they get a test, not for COVID, but for, you know, these, uh, whatever it is, opioids, I guess, poppies. Um, I don't know anything about the details of the drugs. I don't use them. I have been known to indulge in poppy seed bagels from time to time. So I guess I, and I've known for the longest time that if you had an employer, which I never worked for an employer who did drug testing,

but if you work for an employer who did drug testing, you better stay off of the poppy seed bagels because, you know, you can blow a positive on that. So just before rushing off to different hospitals to give birth to women who did not know each other, ate bagels. I don't know why they put that in there. They did not know each other. Was this a conspiracy to eat bagels? Anyway, they did not know each other to eat bagels. They had poppy seeds.

Both were shocked to learn that the hospitals tested them for illicit drugs and then reported them for possible abuse or neglect. Uh, according to their lawsuits that they have filed, uh, both tested positive for drug use due to poppy seeds. They stated their complaints filed with stated their complaints were filed with the state.

Now the two New Jersey women are looking to affect policy changes on how hospitals handle drug testing. It's not an example where you got to stay away from the hospitals. I just, I don't know. 15 minute cities.

It is now the narrative of the mainstream media that if you're concerned about 15-minute cities, if you're concerned about smart cities, if you're concerned about Agenda 21, if you're concerned about the UN 2030 agenda, all of these things that have been written out, many of them for decades, then you are a conspiracy theorist.

It's not real, they say. Well, Doug Casey, there's an article, 15-Minute Cities, and pinning you in for the next lockdown. It's not going to be just for the next lockdown. This pin is going to be permanent. It's a permanent lockdown. And he understands that. The headline doesn't come across that way.

The idea is for bureaucrats to restrict and to eventually prohibit car use because everything is within walking or biking distance and phasing out hydrocarbons for in general, and cars with internal combustion engines, is the primary goal of the carbon hysterics. Doug Casey, this is an interview kind of done in the form of an interview with a magazine. He replies, he says, yeah, social engineering taken to a new level. It's as if the whole human race is taking a role in the Jim Carrey movie, The Truman

Show. But that's way too benign. The way they're trying to reform the cities and force people to stay in place in certain areas, it's more like a panopticon, which was a type of prison where all people could be observed. And, of course, you know, the very term lockdown comes from prisons. And so then they took it to the prototypical prison training, which is a school. Then Trump did it to us. So you're always in view of the guards at all time.

You know, they would have like a guard tower of one example of it would be a guard tower that is in the center of all the cells that are ranged circularly around that. So they all face it. So from that central location, they could watch everybody. That's before they had cameras and before they had artificial intelligence to watch the cameras and to flag people for everything. He said, of course, keeping everybody within a 15-minute radius of their home sounds convenient, but it just makes things much more convenient for the AI to monitor where everybody is,

and not just in their vehicles either. Because the next step along this path will be to make it desirable for everybody to have a chip implanted so that individual bodies can be monitored. When you look at all of this, even the nonsense thing about keeping people six feet apart, they can't explain where that came from. They say, well, we just made it up or whatever. I think it was done because they want to be able to get biometric data

on everybody. You know, if they tell you you got to stay, the magic number is six feet apart. Of course, there's nothing magic at all about that. Nothing scientific or medical about that, except that it keeps you spaced out sufficiently so that the AI can look at the way you walk, look at your height, look at many things other than just your face. And, of course, if they're going to tell you that you've got to put a mask on, they've got to get all the rest of that biometric information as well. Doug Casey said, it's all about control, but it won't be sold as a military, you must do this type of thing, control. It will be soft.

It will be do it for your own good type of control. And of course, it's part of the general climate insanity for the supposed good of Mother Earth. This is why I say, you know, it's like, take what RFK Jr. has to say about the vaccines and the history of vaccines. He knows that very well. And he's been fighting that fight and good for him. And I applaud that very well. And he's been fighting that fight, and good for him.

And I applaud him in that, and I will always reference that stuff. And he also knows how Fauci has been involved and how the CIA has been involved in all this stuff. The germ game chapter of his book on Fauci was excellent. So I'd highly recommend all that stuff, but don't listen to him when it comes to climate. And he's truly a true believer with all that stuff. So yeah, it'll be for the good of mother earth. The idea is to get people to stay out of their cars and for that matter, to stay off of

planes and even on public transportation. And you got to understand that right now, you know, the climate MacGuffin is stronger than it's ever been before. And I think the next steps are likely, I don't know. I mean, they may come up with some kind of a, another fear panic with a pandemic or something, but they are definitely coming with a climate MacGuffin. Casey says people are far easier to control if you know where they're at, at all times. And the elite, again,

they're parasites that don't pursue produce anything. They don't serve any useful purpose. The elites want the plebes to stay in place, not just physically, but to stay in place psychologically, economically, and politically. They would prefer to live in a world where places like St. Mark's Square in Venice is not crowded, where the Grand Canyon is not overwhelmed with the hoi polloi because they're back observing their 15-minute travel zones and adhering to requirements that allow them to expend only so many pounds

of carbon. And that's it. If you look at the Agenda 21 thing that's been there for a long time, you would see that they pack everybody into these gigantic cities that they're going to grow. For example, in Texas, they grow from San Antonio to Austin to Dallas. That'd be one giant mega city. Get everybody else off of the rural lands, the farmland and everything else. There's another reason why when you look at shutting down farms and food and things like that, as they're rolling that out the Netherlands and Belgium and other places in the EU. That's their way to get people off of the farms.

You're going to kill us all because of nitrogen, not just CO2, not just methane. But now it's nitrogen. We're going to have to shut your farms down because they want to pack those people into the cities as well. They want to have the entire world for themselves, keep all the other people locked away in a prison where they can be watched all the time. And 5G was a big part of that. It's one of the other issues that I had with Trump.

Anyway, so they asked Doug Casey, they said, so what can the average person do to safeguard their sovereignty in general and their freedom of travel in particular? Well, he says, first of all, he said, try to relocate into a rural area where you are going to be much more in control of your own life and where you're not surrounded by thousands of people who might rat you out as a nonconformist and could easily turn hysterical. And again, you know, you don't want to live somewhere like New York City where the people love the mask and, uh, and they'll rat you out if you don't wear the mask. That's one of the key reasons why we moved here. As a matter of fact, it was back in

August of 2020. And I was sick and tired of fighting with people over masks and Austin. And we came here to visit Karen's brother in North Carolina. And, um, when we came here to visit Karen's brother in North Carolina. And when we came through Tennessee, they were the most relaxed of any place anywhere. And even going into Gatlinburg, where there's a lot of tourists and the sidewalks were packed. And there were some people who were wearing masks, but for the most part, people weren't wearing them.

And they would have the signs up from the business saying, you know, you got to wear a mask. But, you know, Karen would go up and the person that was working there would have to wear a mask. And she says, do we have to wear a mask? And the person kind of nods their head no, you know. And so it was a relaxed thing. They all knew it was a hoax. Some of them were having to comply with it to keep their job. And you had some tourists who were coming from other areas that were still

wearing their masks. But for the most part, everybody's walking around like normal. I said, we got to get out of Austin. We got to get to a place like that. And that's really true. But I think it's also important not just to get to a rural area. I think you need to get to the Bible Belt. You need to get somewhere where people are grounded in reality. It's not just that you don't have the insanity that's pushed on them, but they got to have something that grounds them in reality. And that's the other thing I like about this area. The people we've met here have been unbelievably friendly. Even going to places like the Department of Motor Vehicles or, you know, Social Security site or something, you know, a place that everybody's just been incredibly

friendly. It's amazing. Friendliest place I've ever lived. Second thing he said is to get as rich as you can because having assets helps to insulate you from both the parasitic elites and the people who are going to come after you to shut you down. Well, look, that's where I disagree with him. I don't think, you't think money is certainly useful.

There's nothing sinful about money. Unless you make it the thing that you love, unless you make it the thing that you trust. Yes, accumulate money to provide for your family, accumulate money to provide for other people. But if you trust in money as a thing that's going to keep you safe, if you trust in money as a thing that's going to be your reward or whatever,

that is not going to be a good thing. Even if it works in this life. You want to make God your shield. Make God your reward. And, you know, you see anything that you get from him as a blessing from him. Thirdly, he know, you see anything that you get from him as a blessing from him. Thirdly, he said, resist any way that you can.

Speak out, let other people know that they're not alone in thinking what's going on and it's actually evil. But you also have to recognize the risks in doing so. That's true. But if you look at the risks in speaking out, I've always believed, one of the reasons why I've been public about it, I've always believed that the risk of not speaking out and of quietly going along with this plan,

when you know what is happening, the risks are greater to you than if you speak out. Because if you speak out, there's a chance that other people, as he said, will realize that they're not the only ones who see through this fraud. Now, just look at the people in that poor neighborhood in Washington, D.C. Fauci called them Republicans.

He said, Republicans don't like to be told what to do. No, those are black, poor people in Washington, D.C. Probably a 96% chance that they are Democrats. But they weren't buying any of that stuff. And they all had the same opinion. And get out of here pushing a fear campaign. They weren't organizing to push back against this, but individually they knew. And I think it was a very powerful thing for them to be able to

see other people saying that. I think it's a very powerful thing for people to see Republicans to see, you know, white Republicans see that there's black Democrats in Washington, DC that aren't buying this stuff either. You know, this is not a Republican conspiracy theory. It's a fraud being perpetrated on all Americans by Republicans and Democrats. So he said we can't change the trends of history. The atmosphere in today's world is like that of the early days of the U.S. Civil War, the early days of World War II. He understands the fourth turning. He said, the boobs become

stupidly hysterical and enthusiastic to join up to fight some real or imagined foe and marching together in lockstep. Yeah, we marched together in lockstep, didn't we, to go into lockdown because we had to fight the COVID war. COVID war. They were very explicit about that. And it was a war. It was a war against us, a war against our constitution, our way of life, everything that we have, our culture, our families,

our fortunes. A giant mind virus is on its way to capturing most people. We live in really dangerous times, he said. And he's true. We really do. And it is kind of interesting, though, when you look at that, just because they build these cities. And of course, Donald Trump has got his own idea for a city. That tells you, again, that he's on board with the globalists. All of these globalists have their utopian city designs that they want to do. And that's one of the first things that Trump did.

He doesn't want to push back against CBDC. He doesn't want to push back against 5G. As a matter of fact, he's pushed 5G. That is the infrastructure of this artificial intelligence, constant surveillance and control state that they're putting together, this 5G. But, you know, if they build this, you don't necessarily need to, um, uh, live in it. Um, you know, in recent years, conspiracy theories have been growing and a growing number of Australians says this article from the daily skeptic, uh, are now skeptical of things like vaccines, a five G and of election results and of the 15 minute cities. It's happened. Think about that.

Trump is on the wrong side of all those things. He's on the wrong side of five G he's on the wrong side of vaccines for sure. He's on the wrong side of the 15 minute cities and he's on the wrong side of the election stuff because it was his lockdown that caused that escalated fraud of the ballot harvesting and all the rest of the stuff. And what does Trump say now? Well, the next election, we're going to do ballot harvesting better than them. He doesn't admit that the fraud was there because he locked the election down.

He says, no, we'll do it better next time. So in all those things, vaccines, 5G, election fraud, the smart cities, he's on the wrong side of everything. He's on the globalist side everything he's on the globalist side that's where he is just amazing people can't see that uh so i said uh again this is an article from australia the person writing it says however gullible australians who cannot appreciate common sense or convenience have been sucked into a dangerous conspiracy. These unhinged

conspiracy theorists actually believe that smart cities are part of a secret plan by global elites to restrict people's freedom and movements. A form of lockdown justified by climate action. Well, I couldn't have said it any better

to describe exactly what it is, except that it's not an imagined conspiracy. It is a real conspiracy. He says, never mind. You want to tell people that this is a conspiracy there? Well, just forget about the fact that Western governments have spent the past three years abusing their power with gross overreach, wanton disregard for their citizens' will or well-being,

which might make some people nervous about giving government more control over movement, over commerce, over energy consumption and the like. These articles that say that 15-minute cities or conspiracies have been flagged as false information on Facebook, so it really settles it. I guess they are definitely false, so we just have to trust them and trust Trump. Because even though he was the precedent for all this stuff, we still need to support him. And as I said, you don't need to live in these cities. For example, China has put together a bunch of cities that were copied

from European cities. Meticulous examples of this, and of course, they're ghost towns. China has built a lot of ghost towns that nobody ever moved into. And now they're tearing them down, left and right. But they do have these EU copies. They have one of these cities. They put the Eiffel Tower awkwardly down the middle of the street. Here, I'll show you some clips of this stuff. This is in China. And notice that the city is completely empty.

There's one girl there that's talking, and she's doing somersaults and spinning around there. But, you know, as you look, there's a castle in China. Hi there. But nobody lives here. It's amazing to see how many of these there are and how extensive it is. That's really nice. They've got marble floors and everything. They're trying to get people.

They think they can use this maybe as a tourist attraction. But why wouldn't you just go to Europe if you are going to travel? So, yeah, they've got luxury hotels, you name it. Oh, and there you have a little tiny car that you can drive around, pretend that you actually have a real car. So they're showing that as, but it's all a case of central planning by Marxists who don't know what they're doing. They decided to build a bunch of European replica cities

across the country in hopes that their exploding population would flock there, live out their European fantasies, but they didn't. They didn't. So now they've got, you know, and we can make these smart cities ghost towns as well. Yeah, you got the Saudi Arabian dictator, Mohammed bin Salman.

He wants to put a, you know, the line out in the middle of the desert. So just like something straight out of the usual science fiction thing where you can't escape because you have to get out of the city. There's nowhere to go. Show some of the pictures that they have on this article there, Travis. European influences can be seen all over in food, culture, and architecture, but China

has taken these influences a little bit too literally. In the 1990s, China experienced an economic boom, started building communities and villages outside of the populated cities. They recreated some of Europe's most popular cities in the finest details. Show the one there that's got the replica. There it is, the Eiffel Tower. Look at that. Just ain't the same thing. They put it right there in the middle

of the city. And then they have, scroll down to the next one. Is this a canal city in Venice? Well, no. Actually, it's just a cheap knockoff. Very cheesy. And it's just a cheap knockoff. Very cheesy. And it's actually a discount outlet mall. Then they did an Austrian Alpine village.

The writers of this article said, well, that's a little bit better. That's in Guangdong. That cost nearly a billion dollars to build. So maybe the Chinese aren't that formidable after all. They're making their little Potemkin villages everywhere. What was once a tourist tourism plan that was so bold in scope that it was unfathomable to other continents fell victim to its own hype. Tourists were left underwhelmed by the strange iterations to the world's favorite destinations, settings that felt more akin to film production lots. And so the regular cities that they put there, they're tearing them down.

They can't get the tourists to go into this one. And again, we see for the second time referenced today in the news, the Truman Show. Who could have thought that divorcing these places from context and culture makes them more uncanny valley? Exactly. have thought that divorcing these places from context and culture makes them more uncanny valley exactly these truman show type creations were doomed to flop this failed experiment by the chinese a perfect example of how you can't recreate the beauty and the emotion behind art you know that's one of the reasons you know i always liked that i liked europe when i went there

uh my senior year with a group of uh people music group that was there and we go in these different places they were so small the countries are so small and everywhere you go they had like this different language and different culture and a different dress and different money and all the rest of stuff now they're in terms of multiculturalism and and supposedly serving that what they're doing is they're homogenizing everything and uh so yeah it just uh it isn't there but but look when i see these empty cities created by the central planners being torn down all over china it gives me heart that we can do the same thing here uh and we must do the same thing.

Just because they build these cities, just because they build this infrastructure, because they build this usurped base of power with their executive orders, doesn't mean we have to live in it. There's other alternatives available for us. We're going to be right back. Stay with us. ¶¶ Analyzing the globalist's next move.

And now, The David Knight Show. Earlier in the program, I had an article from The New American. I was happy to see that they were warning people that it was a trap, what the Republicans were doing in terms of setting up bills. We're going to help you with education. We're going to give you vouchers to help you pay for your private school, your charter school, your home school. No, it's a trap.

They're not trying to help you. They're trying to create dependence. So I was very happy to see they had a spot-on article about that. And this article here, the anniversary of the Quartering Act of 1774. That was on Saturday. I missed that anniversary. I'm glad they had it. But he also had something else has been a kind of a hobby horse of mine. And that is the fact that you frequently hear people say the only one of the

bill of rights they haven't violated is the third amendment and say, well, I think they have because the government, the NSA, the CIA, the intelligence community, uh, they're, they're living on my computer. They're living on my phone. They're living the intelligence community, uh, they're, they're living on my computer. They're living on my phone. They're living, you know, uh, they're, they're living in my house in an even more private way. And I'm glad that they talked about this. You know, when they get onto your computer, they get onto your phone. That's a clear violation of the fourth amendment, even though they ignore that violation, but it's also a violation of the Third Amendment as well. He said Samuel Adams and the rights of the colonists had a list of violations

and of rights in his letter of correspondence of 20th November 1772. And then on this day in 1774, the Quartering Act went into effect in the British colonies of North America. That was on Saturday. The Quartering Act of 1774 was a law passed by the British Parliament as part of a series of measures aimed at asserting greater control, control, over its American colonies. The act required colonists to provide housing and basic necessities to British troops who were stationed in the colonies. The Quartering Act of 1774 amended an earlier Quartering Act from 1765,

which required colonists to provide quarters, that is housing, for British soldiers in public buildings such as inns and taverns. But then, after they established that, they take it to the next step. They do it iteratively, right? So after they say, well, you're going to have to send soldiers there. You're going to have to provide quarters for them in public buildings. Then in 1774, nine years later, they say, no, you're going to have to provide quarters for them in your own private home

and other private buildings. It allowed British soldiers to be quartered in private homes if necessary, required colonial governments to provide food, drink, bedding, and other supplies for the troops. The act was unconstitutional under the English constitution. It was a violation of the colonists' rights as Englishmen, and it was a further infringement on their right of self-governance, which had been under assault for years. And I've seen this debated with Christians, you know, well, was the American Revolution, was it justified? Was it a rebellion against God's order? No, actually, the people who were, the king was in rebellion. The king was in rebellion to the Magna Carta, right? That the king back in Runnymede had signed, he'd been forced to sign the Magna Carta, which said that he was not to rule as an absolute monarch.

And by the time they got to George III, they had taken those powers back. They had violated the Magna Carta. They had also violated other things that were in the other rights that had been established by the English. And so for all those things, it was the government that rebelled. It was the government that rebelled against the lawful order. It was the government that rebelled against the Magna Carta that gave them the authority and put the restrictions on the king in the first place. Just as our government is in rebellion. The American people have not rebelled yet.

But the government has long, for a long time, been in rebellion against the Constitution. And that's both parties, not just the Democrats. Uh, among the 10 amendments comprising the bill of rights, the third amendment was specifically targeted at preventing a repeat of the denial of the rights and Liberty and property that Americans had experienced under these two quartering acts. The text of the 1774 amendment to the quartering act reveals the de facto denial of consent of the governed.

For example, soldiers of his majesty's service shall remain within any of the said colonies without quarters for the space of 24 hours. If that's the case, such quarters shall have been demanded. It shall and may be lawful for the governor of 24 hours, if that's the case, such quarters shall have been demanded. It shall and may be lawful for the governor of the province to order and direct such and so many uninhabited houses, outhouses, barns, or other buildings, as he shall think necessary to be taken,

making a reasonable allowance for the same, and to make it for the reception of such officers and soldiers and to put and quarter such officers and soldiers therein for such a time as he shall think proper, as long as he wants, whatever it is in his opinion. How is this all that much different from these executive orders that we live under, from these rules and

regulations that come from our unelected bureaucrats who tax us without representation, who regulate us without representation, unaccountable, unelected cannot be removed, will not be stopped by a rump legislature that does nothing other than show hearings about any of this stuff. Whereas the earlier iteration confined the quartering to public buildings, this one took it into all these private places, as I mentioned, homes and other things like that.

The Third Amendment, by the way, said no soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. And so they have made themselves at home in all of our electronic devices. So is that the same thing? Well, the New American says, yes, I think it actually is. Setting aside the fact that the U.S. of the 21st century has had an enormous multibillion-dollar standing army for decades now, no one would suggest that we've seen a non-consensual quartering of the military in our homes, right?

He said, no, I think we have. He said the Third Amendment could be construed in a novel way to thwart the progress toward the federal government's goal of placing every American under surveillance. And he supports this with two things. Number one, he said you need to remember that the National Security Agency, the NSA, is part of the Department of Defense and therefore is part of the military. According to federal regulation, the director of the NSA must be an officer in the U.S. Armed Forces. Additionally, the NSA's on website makes its military purpose very clear, and I think we could make the same argument, by the way, for the CDC.

They have to have a uniform. They have to have a rank. They are commissioned, uniformed. We're really under martial law, medical martial law, and many other types of martial law. NSA is part of the U.S. This is what it says on its own website. The NSA says on its own website, the NSA is part of the U S department of defense

serving as a combat support agency. Supporting our military service members around the world is one of the most important things we do. NSA analysts, linguists, engineers, other personnel deployed to Afghanistan, other hostile areas. Of course, they also deploy to the United States to try to figure out which of us are hostile. And he says, remember, the purpose behind the Third Amendment was not just to prevent the seizure of private homes by the military. Listen, this is the second part. So first of all, the NSA is the military. It is part of the military.

And the purpose of the Third Amendment wasn't just to make sure that you didn't have soldiers living there. The purpose was also, the purpose of the Third Amendment was to deny the military access to conversations and attitudes of homeowners. Well, now they've got social media for that. Your attitudes, your conversations are all there available. It's one of the reasons why the intelligence community funded with venture capital. The CIA created, came out of the closet.

You know, they used to always do these things secretly, but then they created, openly created a venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel. But if you look at the boards of these venture capital firms that funded Facebook and Google and Twitter and all this, they're loaded with people from the CIA, from the NSA, and all these different intelligence agencies, right? People at the very top. And so they picked the people who were going to compete, let them compete so the strongest ones won, knowing that they were going to have a treasure trove of information out there about

everybody that they could just scrape. And even better, just as they're accusing TikTok, because they had the inside track with these people, they don't even have to scrape it. They can get it turned over directly to them by Twitter, by Facebook, by Google, by all the rest of these companies. They turn your information over to them directly. But the fact that they're on your computer as well, that would be a violation, I believe,

of the Third Amendment. Access to your conversations, your attitudes, access that was and still is used to identify people as enemies of the Third Amendment. Access to your conversations, your attitudes, access that was and still is used to identify people as enemies of the tyrant and to keep those suspected of harboring anti-government sentiments under the close watch of agents of the regime. And not just anti-government sentiments, but anti-narrative sentiments.

You don't agree with their pandemic. You don't agree with their climate MacGuffin. You don't agree with their pandemic. You don't agree with their climate. McGuffin. You don't agree with their vaccine. Oh, well you were anti-government extremist terrorists then, right? And the case of the NSA, those agents are part of the military and that's the third amendment could be invoked to stop the infiltration of the surveillance state into the homes of Americans.

Well, again, we can always try to invoke it. Uh, but, um, uh, does anybody in either party care about the, uh, constitution? I played for you earlier,

the new Muslim leader of Scotland who hates the fact that there's so many white people in Scotland and they're going to work on that. They're going to work on replacing them. Uh, but also coming out of the UK, coming out of the Daily Skeptic, this statement that almost everything is institutionally racist. This is a 363-page report published last week by the government in the UK. And everything is pretty much

institutionally racist. For example, I'll just read you some of the things out of this 363-page report. Everything is racist. The London Fire Brigade is institutionally racist. British policing

is institutionally racist. UK universities are institutionally racist. And you have the UK research is institutionally racist. British schools are institutionally racist. And you have the UK research is institutionally racist. British schools are institutionally racist. Cricket Scotland is institutionally racist. I guess there's just not enough people of color who are interested in playing cricket in Scotland.

I mean, they'd have to all turn out because they're only 4% of the population. So everybody's got to play cricket and keep it from being institutionally racist. According to these people, the judiciary in England and Wales is the NHS is institutionally racist. The conservative party is institutionally racist,

even though it is led by Rishi Sunak, who's Indian. The labor party is institutionally racist. You know, it's just like we had had we're america's racist because even though obama was elected president we're still racist you know la la harris is vice but we're still racist uh google and big tech are institutionally racist the bbc is institutionally racist the uk itself is institutionally racist according to a group

of un experts for that one. So I guess the solution is that we must destroy all institutions, right? Take them to the ground, which, again, is the goal of Marxism. It's always about that. And so you understand they don't have an issue with that. As a matter of fact, they are the most hateful racist people out there, and they are the ones who are pushing to shut everything down. Any institution that doesn't worship minorities is racist.

If they're not led, chaired, every single position staffed by them, they're racist. Well, even if they are, because you could have a lot of white liberals and they're constantly self-flagellating themselves as they're going along. We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back with some more news. We're going to talk about Agatha Christie gets the rewrite treatment. Yes, the most popular author, fiction author in the world now gets the rewrite from these people who think everything is racist everywhere, all the time. We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we had all the institutions of Great Britain are racist. The UK itself is racist.

They're all institutionally racist. The question is, how come they're all racist when all of our institutions have been taken over by elitists, by leftists, by people who are Marxist and racist themselves? Well, I guess that's where it is. They're just not telling you in which direction they're racist. Now, these elitist institutions are coming after Agatha Christie. And I guess we could say, as we're going to rewrite everybody. These little censors, these little Marxists with their graffiti pens going in and changing everything. Defacing even more literature. I guess we could say, and then there were none.

Because that was her most famous novel. Then there was no literature left. Because they uh, they defaced it all and their graffiti and all the rest of their nonsense on it. Uh, she had the characters like Hercule Perrault, Miss Marple, the things like that, the mousetrap, uh, longest running play going back to the 1950s. I think it's still performing. I guess they had to have a hiatus during the lockdown insanity. But that'll be a footnote to the statistic, I guess, that level of insanity. But they have sensitivity readers is what they call these censors. Now, they're just censors. They're just intolerant, hateful censors who are trying to dominate us.

And again, if you agree with them on any of this stuff, then they'll find something else to make you cower before them. So don't agree with them on anything. Don't worry about hurting their feelings. They're intentionally aggrieved and you can't avoid that. So don't try to play to their insanity. Uh, since every readers have made the edits, you can see this in the digital versions because, you know, digital versions are very easy to memory hole. Updates follow edits made to books by Roald Dahl

and Ian Fleming to remove offensive references to gender and race. No, they're not offensive. These people are offended by everything, perpetually offended by everything. So they cut references to ethnicity such as describing a character as black, Jewish, gypsy, female, saying the torso of one was as of black marble, or a judge's, quote, Indian temper, unquote, and to remove terms such as oriental and the N-word.

The word natives has been replaced with the word local. And that makes it all better, doesn't it? Amazing. A 1964 Miss Marple novel, A Caribbean Mystery, has the amateur detectives musing that a hotel worker smiling at her has, quote, such lovely white teeth, unquote. That's been removed uh i guess white teeth are racist as well should pull them out to show our solidarity with black

lives matter yeah molars don't matter bicuspids don't matter gu Guinness World Records lists Christie as the best-selling fiction writer of all time. Her books have sold more than 2 billion copies. And now the people who own her copyright, it's not enough that they make this much money out of it. They now have to deface it. It's absolutely amazing. Speaking of defacing and rewriting things, the U.S. Army has now set a date for changing the names of any Confederate,

any bases that are named after Confederate generals. Well, I got to say this about the Confederates. At least they didn't wear dresses and high heels. I would say they're much better than our current crop of military leaders. What do you say? That was something that they tried to shame Jefferson Davis about. heels. I would say they're much better than our current crop of military leaders. What do you say? That was something that they tried to shame Jefferson Davis about. I don't know if it was true or not. They said he was trying to escape. And to escape, he dressed as, he identified as a different gender, they said, wearing a dress and trying to escape. But they found him anyway,

and they tried to, and that was the most humiliating thing they could find to throw at him. Today, he would have been worshipped. He would have been made president of the Union if they would have found him in a dress, or at least he would have been part of the cabinet of the presidency, like Dick Levine or whatever. So they will purge all names, symbols, displays, monuments, and paraphernalia, honoring those who fought for the South during the U.S. Civil War because we have to purge all names, symbols, displays, monuments, and paraphernalia, honoring those who fought for the South during the U.S. Civil War,

because we have to purge all history. You must not understand what is going on. And purge people who stood for honor, like Robert E. Lee. There's probably nobody who stood for honor more than Robert E. Lee, including George Washington, as a matter of fact. I don't have anything against George Washington, but even when Robert E. Lee was at West Point, he didn't get a single demerit,

even though their whole system is set up to give you a demerit. And his fellow cadets called him the marble man. They'll be making statues to this guy someday. Little did they know he would be teaching at West Point, and then he would be defeating these generals because he had taught them as students and he kind of understood their, their personalities.

Anyway, Fort hood and central Texas, uh, will be changed to, um, uh, Cavazos, a Hispanic,

Hispanic four-star general. Uh, and then you'll have Fort Barfoot. I saw that and I thought, Fort Barfoot. That sounds like something Festus would say to Marshall Dillon. Well, Marshall, I'm heading off to Fort Barfoot. Fort Barefoot or something. No, it's actually an Indian that is Barfoot.

I don't think it's a tribe that would be the proud feet um black feet proud feet of uh tolkien anyway uh so you got there you go we're getting all the bases covered here we got uh fort barfoot after a native american we got cavazos after hispanic because you know it's just disqualifying. It's not just being a Confederate. I mean, these people were white. That's their big crime. You know, uh, hood and Lee, they were all white. You can't name a base after a white person.

And then you have a Fort Greg Adams, uh, and it will be, um, they're going to replace Robert Lee. They're going to change it. Fort Lee is going to be Fort Greg Adams. It'll be named after black three-star general Greg and charity Adams, the first black woman to become an officer and the women's army auxiliary corps, um, officer. They don't even mention her rank.

Uh, but there you go. Indian Hispanic, a black man, a black woman. Um, when are we going to have Fort Levine named after Dick himself? I don't know. It's got to be coming because they still got some forts that they have to rename that they haven't come up with names yet. So it could happen. I mean, he was the woman of the year and he was, uh, the first woman admiral.

So, well, not a fort, maybe, I guess a ship. Maybe, I don't know. Anyway, Fort Benning is going to be named in honor of Hal Moore, who led the U.S. in its first large-scale battle of the Vietnam War, and his wife. See, the problem is they wanted to honor this guy who led a large-scale battle in the Vietnam war, but then they're going to be honoring a white man. And so there's a problem with that. So they say, well, it's to honor him and his wife. What did she do? She was an advocate

for army community service. They're reaching here. They're reaching here. But, you know, it's not just to honor the guy who led the battle. No, it's his wife. She did something with community service in the army. She was an advocate for it. I don't even say she did it. She advocated it.

So this is a body that was impaneled by Congress in 2021, the Pelosi Congress, to purge anything that could be perceived as venerating the Confederacy in the wake of Black Lives Matter. Because, you know, their riots were mostly peaceful. So we had to honor them. January the 6th, even though it was mostly peaceful, and even though people peacefully walked in as they were shown the way by the military, not the military, but the police officers that were there, even encouraged to go in, as we now see with some of the stuff, some of the camera footage that has now been

released. We see police officers encouraging, go on up, go on up, pushing them to go. We now have a January the 6th attorney straight up asked the Department of Justice lawyers if more witnesses were FBI informants. He said they said nothing. But it turns out that it got so bad, they actually got an FBI informant posing as a defense witness, posing as a supporter of the defense so that she can spy on what the defense is doing and spy on the prisoners. So they not only had informants there, agent provocateurs there,

on January the 6th, but they have continued to push informants and spies into the legal proceedings and into the people who are the prisoners there. And this is part of the trial of Joe Biggs, who I know worked with.

Department of Justice revealed that a witness who January 6th defendant Enrique Tarrio's lawyers planned to call for testimony had been an FBI informant. His lawyer said the Department of Justice attorneys would not tell him whether two other planned witnesses were FBI informants. A hearing transcript shows. He said, my biggest concern is the fact we still have confidential human sources who are unknown to us. So in a Thursday hearing last week, he subsequently asked the Department of Justice about that. He said, you know what they told me?

He said nothing. They said, well, they don't know. All of the responses have been made through the court, but they're not getting that back. Now, the person that they're concerned about, the New York Times on Friday identified a female source. Her name is Jen Loh, L-O-H. She was a former official of Latinos for Trump. Yeah, the whole stop the steal, save America, Latinos for Trump. The whole thing was, it was a trap.

It was a trap. It was a sting, by the way. Yeah. It wasn't a sting of the people who were running the election. It was a sting of the people who followed Trump. At least that part of Steve Pachinik's thing was true. It was a sting, sting operation. Lowe had 20 to 30 communications with Joe Biggs when she was an FBI confidential source,

said Biggs' attorney Norman Pattis. I know Norman too. Norm, anyway. Pattis told presiding judge Timothy Keller that the defense was, quote, very close to stipulation on as many as eight or nine other FBI sources and would argue that there was a complex network of confidential human sources at the government's disposal. You notice she was running the organization, Latinos for Trump.

This is the pattern that you see. You know, it's just like you want an analogy to January the 6th. I've mentioned this many times. The analogy is what Felix Dzerzhinska, the head of Lenin's Cheka, that was his secret police at the time, Cheka. Felix Dzerzhinsky, in terms of the Bolsheviks, they wanted to spy on their opponents. And so what they did was they created an organization they called The Trust.

And they funded it, and it was supposed to be anti-Bolshevik. And so they had, you know, all throughout Europe and UK and everything, they had these trust offices, and the whole purpose of it was to draw in people who were opposed to the communists and to suck up money from them and then to ultimately betray them. You know, we were just talking about how Ian Fleming's books were re-edited. Well, you know, in real life, the guy that Ian Fleming said was his model for James Bond was Sigmund Reilly, and Sigmund Reilly was actually entrapped by the Trust. They lured him into Russia, arrested him, tortured and killed him, and he'd been a very, very successful spy.

As a matter of fact, during World War I, he spoke so many different languages. Most people didn't even know where he was from, but he spoke so many different languages that he infiltrated the German high command. He was pretended to be an officer and got away with it, got a lot of information from them. And of course, he had been working for years for the British in terms of establishing their access to oil and other things like that, the early part of the 20th century, and also working to compete against, um, other countries in terms of selling weapons to Japan and, uh, other, you know, and to Russia and things like that. So, um, anyway, he was lured in by the trust and that's

the way these guys operate. That's the way the FBI operates now. You know, they, they create, you know, they bust all these people and say, well, they had a terrorist plot. Well, they were the ones who created this whole thing and they lure people in, you know, they get a couple of people that low IQ, they didn't really understand what's going on. And you got all these FBI agents and they, Hey, we got a plot to do this terrorist act or that terrorist act. Don't worry. We'll build the bomb for you. We'll build the bomb for you. We'll supply the bomb for you.

We'll do this. We'll drive the getaway car. And they do all this stuff, and these rubes come along with them. And at the last minute, they bust them so they can claim themselves as heroes. They're nothing but a bunch of arsonists working for the fire department. They say, oh, look, you know, they set the fire and then they put it out. Proclaim themselves heroes. Judge Kelly quashed a defense subpoena for Proud Boys member Kenneth Lizardo, saying that he had a reporting relationship with the FBI and had declared

his intention to plead the fifth if called to testify. Lizardo had gone with Tarrio to the January the 5th meeting in Washington, D.C. with Oath Keepers militia group founder Stuart Rhodes, who was ultimately convicted January the 6th of seditious conspiracy. Another outrageous over-prosecution, in my opinion. I mean, I'm not, you know, I think Stuart Rhodes has done many questionable things i think he exploited people financially grifted them

you know had many people who were in oath keepers saying that but seditious conspiracy getting 20 to 40 years in prison no way come on that is the most excessive egregious punishment for this anyway court filings reported in november November suggested the FBI had up to eight informants within the Proud Boys. Former Tennessee Proud Boys chapter leader Matthew Walter told the outlet in February that he and up to 20 other group members had FBI relationships around that time. So this Jen Lowe, who was insinuating herself in there. Her connections with the FBI go back all the way to 2019. She has since helped January the 6th defendants through fundraising efforts and protesting against their conditions of confinement.

Is this a trust operation here? She communicated with one or more defense lawyers, participated in prayer meetings with one or more defendants' families, talked with one or more of the defendants' family members about replacing one of more defense lawyers, participated in prayer meetings with one or more defendant's families, talked with one or more of the defendant's family members about replacing one of the defense counsel. And then on Thursday, the Department of Justice admitted that she told the FBI around January the 9th that she had been subpoenaed to testify in the case and participate in a deposition. They said her source relationship with the FBI ended nine days later. So Nordean's attorney claimed that in and around April 2022,

Jen Lowe had started asking him detailed questions about matters like evidence in the case. They hired the FBI's got people spying on them during the trial, the legal process. Withholding evidence, like the videos, withholding evidence that could be exculpatory, and then spying on them at the same time just never ends. It was always an obvious trap. Anyway, it looks like this informant was active in discussing information with the FBI handler at approximately the same time, they said. They had Spindle, who worked for the FBI, had sworn that the FBI did not task her with collecting information about the defendants in the case, saying the Bureau was never given any information about contact she had with them or the lawyers for that matter she said it's hard for me to see people calling me a rat and a fed and things like that so um she says i think it's sad that we've gotten so polarized in this

country well maybe it's because of latinos for trump and that type of stuff he was the guy who polarized them again i miss the days when stool pigeons were treated with the respect they deserved yeah an fbi informants i mean i'm an fbi informant you know with the fbi hey you should be impressed uh no i mean you know you've got uh the feds new footage showing the metropolitan cops encouraging people to go toward the capital go go go help them push them up that type of thing That's on the camera there. You know, they focus on re-ups, but they ignore all the rest of this stuff. And they ignore the people who made millions of dollars. People like Trump who made hundreds of millions of dollars doing this.

And you focus on re-ups? You know, the big elephant in the room is that Save America. The big elephant in the room is Stop the Steal, but they don't want to talk about that. It truly is amazing what has happened to our country. Everything has been turned upside down. Well, we are out of time. I had more that I wanted to say about this, but we'll have to pick that up again tomorrow. Join us at 9 a.m. Central. I really do appreciate your support.

Please pass along. If you're not able to support us because of the economy, please pass the broadcast along to other people. Thank you very much. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show, you can listen to with your

ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes in fact if you can hear me that means you're listening to the David Knight show right now yeah good job and And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the David night show dot com. That's a Web site.