The David Knight Show - 28Oct22 Ben Shapiro FINALLY Realizes Trump Shots are Bad — AFTER Shilling for Years

Episode Date: October 27, 2022

Show Outline — with topics by timecode:AFTER 959 DAYS —Ben Shapiro: “It’s now perfectly clear that we were lied to.” Is Ben REALLY that gullible? 7:16Is good that Alt-Establishment media like Shapiro are admitting that the TrumpShots are bad, but it begs the question: What needs to be done about the vaccine in light of that "discovery"? 10:52Two charts showing mRNA vaccine tied to increased death rates. 18:11Black people have a higher death rate than white people — could it be acceptance rate of mRNA vaccine? 21:57Vaccines and vaccination have become a religious belief, no evidence needed, no science allowed. 29:16Austin, Texas woman waits on hold with 911 for 15 minutes as her husband dies. Did they fire responders for not getting jabbed? 44:17Titanium Dioxide found in large percentage of MASKS 46:59Even the Left can't defend Fetterman’s performance in the debate, but thanks to the Trump Precedent of MAIL-OUT election ballots, the debate may not matter 53:12Fetterman proves he’s not cognitively able to serve.56:54The best debate Tuesday night was the one between the media scrum and Tudor Nixon AFTER her debate with Gretchen Whitmer 1:02:51Oz & Fetterman may not be worth a look, but the issues discussed — highlight the differences between the parties on issues like ENERGY 1:05:35Would you support legislation that would issue a federal abortion ban? 1:13:16Why did the Democratic Party allow him to go out on stage?1:16:49In NY, Hochul doesn't understand why CRIME is an issue to the people and why Zeldin keeps asking her about it. What’s happening in Democrat run Houston. 1:20:39David welcomes Tony Arterburn to the show. "Dr. Doom", Nouriel Roubini thinks predicts worst financial crisis in half century. Here's what he suggests… 1:29:44What are the mega risks in the works? 1:32:51Half of COMEX "Eligible" silver found to NOT exist? What’s going on in the world of precious metals right now? 1:40:51What’s happening in the crypto markets. 1:52:47Is the term “globalist”, racist, anti-semitic? 2:01:54Jeremy Hunt is now running the country. This is a globalist coup. 2:05:43Boris Johnson is coming to the United States to lobby for Ukraine. Is the globalist working pro bono or as paid lobbyist? 2:11:30Tesco, the largest grocery store chain in the world. It's first “Checkout Free” store in central London shows a disturbing pattern for "smart" surveillance and corporate "governance". 2:19:30Former head of CIA and NSA brags "we kill people based on Metadata" 2:21:22Canadians can now no longer buy or sell handguns because Dictator Trudeau says so 2:28:17Diesel supplies are very scarce across the northeast and in the Southeast.2:38:10Green Davos dictator, UK PM Rishi Sunak, bans fracking AND bans On-shore wind farms. ZERO ENERGY policy. 2:41:21NPR tries to make the case that Biden's policies have nothing to do with the price of oil — and the record draw down of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) has nothing to do with Biden or politics? 2:48:55Biden’s marijuana pardons was just a calculated lie, virtue signaling, did not free a single federal prisoner. 2:56:57Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday. I'm sorry, Thursday, the 27th of October. Year of Our Lord 2022, day 959 of the emergency. And we have a key media figure who has now reversed himself on the vaccines. After 959 days, he now realizes that he was deceived. You had one job to research what's going on and tell people the truth. You failed. But Biden, however, is now showing just how virile he is. He drove a car 100

miles per hour on a drag strip. He couldn't even drive when he was vice president. It's against the rules for them to drive their own cars for whatever reasons, safety reasons, whatever, Secret Service. Maybe he could prove how virile he is by racing Fetterman. I'd like to see a race between the two of them.

Demolition Derby. That's the Democrat Party right there in a nutshell. We'll be right back. Stay with us. During 2021, we should be able to manufacture a lot of vaccines. And that vaccine, a key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no infection going on whatsoever. Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. We can kind of almost see the end.

We're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. Cannot do it. Can't use them. The vaccines will get us to the end of this. But Rachel can use you. Vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. Fully vaccinated people are at a very, very low risk of getting COVID-19.

Therefore, if you've been fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask. When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected. We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take it, A, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You want to be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. I think given the country as a whole, the fact that we have now about 50% of adults fully vaccinated

and about 62% of adults having received at least one dose as a nation, I feel fairly certain you're not going to see the kind of surges we've seen in the past. If you're vaccinated, you're not going to be hospitalized. You're not going to be in an ICU unit, and you're not going to die. You're okay. You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Yeah, that's kind of funny in retrospect. What's even funnier is that Ben Shapiro says he was deceived.

He now realizes that what he was told by Gates, by Walensky, by Rachel Maddow, by NBC, by Biden, by Fauci, Fauci, Fauci, Fauci, and also by Trump, by Trump. He realizes that that was now a lie. He was deceived. Ben, you had one job. For the last 959 days, this lie has been used to lock us down.

This lie has been used to push passports, globalist Chinese-style communist passports. It has been used to take everything away from us and hand it back as a privilege. And you thought it was real. You're not that stupid. I wonder if your listeners are. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Yeah, Ben Shapiro is not dumb, but maybe his listeners are.

He's long been a strong advocate for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, believing that it was the socially responsible thing to do to save grandma, to slow or to prevent or to stop the spread. I mean, you want to stop it right there with you. You get your vaccine because we want you to be the dead end. He actually said that. We want you to literally be the dead end. He actually said that. We want you to literally be the dead end. We want to sterilize you. We want to kill you rapidly or slowly.

We want you to be the dead end. He believed that. Shapiro said that like many others, he had been deceived about the vaccines. You know, there are some people who have been deceived by it, I think, honestly. Franklin Graham doesn't come across to me as the brightest guy, but regardless, he's not a news guy. He's not a news guy.

He had pericarditis. He had to have open-heart surgery. They had to remove the exterior sac around his heart because it was going to stop his heart. And yet, he doesn't talk about it. Why is that? The light has not gone off? I could believe that about Franklin Graham.

I mean, he doesn't, again, he's not somebody who hangs out in the news. He could be easily deceived. He could still be gaslighted by his own doctors into thinking that had nothing to do with the vaccine. Maybe he doesn out in the news. It could be easily deceived. It could still be gaslighted by his own doctors and the thinking that had nothing to do with the vaccine. Maybe he doesn't read the news. Ben Shapiro lives in the news. Come on. Seriously.

You just now 959 days. You figured this. I mean, this was obvious from the minute the executive order for lockdown went out because it practices for 20 years. Ben, you didn't realize that he said on Tuesday on his show, the Ben Shapiro show, which by the way, still on YouTube, right, they don't have a problem with somebody who pushed the vaccine for him for a thousand days, a problem with me. Uh, he said, it's now perfectly clear that we were lied to and it's now safe for him to say this on

youtube and we were lied to at a very high level and from very very early on by both the vaccine companies in terms of the ability of the vaccine to prevent transmission. Well, that's what a vaccine is all about, isn't it? Supposed to be. And by politicians who apparently knew better, says Ben. Golly. Shazam. Yeah. You know, that's exactly what I heard from Jake Tapper when I engaged him on Twitter.

And I said, you reported that Sam Hyde did this shooting. And Jake Tapper came back and said, well, I was told that by a congressman. And we reported what the congressman said. And I told Jake Tapper, I said, that's the problem with you and CNN. You report whatever the authorities tell you to do without looking and bothering to look whether or not it's true. And then he blocked me. But anyway, so, yeah, he said he was, you know, he was lied to, deceived by politicians at very high levels who probably knew what was going on for the last thousand days,

but Ben Shapiro didn't know. But Shapiro took issue of the possibility that the Biden administration, it wasn't the Trump administration, understand. The Biden administration knew as much over a year ago, but it nevertheless stood by its original narrative. He said, quote, it turns out the Biden white house knew this and they promoted the lie anyway. This is truly amazing stuff.

He said, well, here's a newsflash for you, Ben. I hate to break this to you, but your hero Trump did as well. You know, Ben Shapiro was not about supporting candidate Trump. You remember that? He did not support candidate Trump when candidate Trump was saying the right things. But when president Trump started doing all the wrong things, that was when Ben Shapiro became a big fan. You had a lot of people in the conservative press. Once he started doing the wrong thing, uh,

started falling behind him. Now he's still silent about Trump, isn't he? Because he's still slanting the truth or an agenda. He's still slanting the truth for at live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the roar,

and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Views. He doesn't want to criticize Trump. The time has come for him to back back away from the vaccine.

And that's what Alex was doing when he tried to back away from Trump. Of course, he's now back to loving Trump again. But, you know, he criticized Trump multiple times. Why? I just can't follow him in because the vaccine thing. Took him a long time to say that. So I guess the question is now, so what is the solution, Ben and Alex, all you guys who are back and forth and back and forth? You know, you're in this difficult position because Trump loves it.

Trump says, I'm the father of the vaccine. Well, that's stretching it a bit. He's the producer of the vaccine, the director, the creators. That has a long genealogy of other people who've been involved in this, unfortunately. But what needs to be done now? So here's a question, Ben. What do we do with the FDA? What do we do with the CDC?

What do we do with the NIH, the WHO? What do we do about executive orders? What do we do about this legal immunity going back to 1986 or the prep act. What do we do about any of that stuff? What do we do, Ben, about the mandates and the passports that were based on the fear of a non-existent pandemic and the lies about the safety and efficacy of a

bioweapon, the vaccine. What do we do about that now? I mean, should, should there be some, I mean, you know,

you were deceived and now you, you know, the vaccine is bad do we do about that now? I mean, should there be some, I mean, you were deceived and now you know the vaccine is bad. Should we stop it? Should we stop it right now? Or should we just take the position that the GOP politicians are, which is well, I'm not going to tell anybody what to do.

I'm not going to tell you you can't have it. I may not buy it and provide it to you, says DeSantis. The other governors will. They'll buy it, provide it for free. But they're not going to tell you that you can't do it. They're not going to come out against a continuous murder campaign for money. They're hired killers.

They're part of the pharmakia. Their hands are dirty, just like your hands, Bill. My men. So if you've got something that is killing people, maybe you want to come out and oppose it. But of course, they didn't oppose the MMR shots and still don't, which are killing 11 kids per year. These flu shots and MMR shots have injured 324,000 people over the last 30 years, according to VAERS. That number is probably anywhere from, according to Harvard,

Harvard said, well, that number is reported, underreported. Only 1% of them are reported. So Harvard says 100 times that. We had another study that was done more recently. It said it was 40 times that. Some people say it's only five times that. But we shouldn't worry about that because we don't want to come out and ruffle any feathers about these politicians

because that's where your bread is buttered. A University of Pennsylvania professor, Jeffrey Morris, just sent us a major gift, says Steve Kirsch. Now, this is a guy who is, he is pro-vaccine. And he spends a lot of time criticizing what Steve Kirsch is doing. Again, Steve Kirsch, multimillionaire, engineer, entrepreneur, who was working with these people and said, well, wait a minute, some of this stuff doesn't make any sense.

He started questioning it. Immediately, he was kicked out of the club. He believed it enough to get his family vaccinated. And I understand that because, again, this was not a field that he was involved in. It was not his area of expertise. I guess you could say, since I covered this thing for decades, the CDC, Fauci, the NIH was an area of my expertise. So I don't take any credit for having seen what I've been watching, you know,

I identifying what I have seen these people do for decades before they rolled it out this time. Uh, that was just because I was there. But he says data in two charts from University of Pennsylvania Professor Jeffrey Morris's article show clearly that the vaccines are causing excess deaths. He said the shot goes in and the death rate starts climbing. Do it again, the shot goes in, the death rate starts going up. But this time by a smaller amount. He goes, that's dose dependent. If the vaccine is perfectly safe, nothing should happen to the death rate on each dose.

It should be virtually identical. Well, part of the problem is the doses are not identical. They vary from three micrograms of content to 100 micrograms of content. What kind of quality control do we have if it varies by a factor of 33? I mean, you know, the difference between medicine and poison even is dosage dependent. That's what I always say about dumping fluoride into the water. Okay, let's put on the back burner here for a moment. What fluoride does to the IQ

of children has been proven by Harvard studies and other things, but, um, you know, it's dose dependent, but how do you control the dose when you just dump it into the water? Well, you know, Pfizer's not even trying to control the dosage and their vile shots, spell that V I L E. And there's no liability for that. Of course. What should we do about that, Ben? Should we change the liability laws for these people? What do you think? Steve Kirsch says, this means that the VAERS spikes in deaths are not from over-reporting, as the CDC and Professor Morris have erroneously claimed, these are real excess deaths. These people need to get out of their ivory tower and talk to real doctors who are being inundated with injuries and

deaths. Why would everyone instantly decide to over-report only the COVID vaccine and not any other vaccine over the last 30 years? And when you look in, he doesn't say this, but when you look at the Department of Defense database, which is very carefully monitored because they're trying to identify an attack. Is the U.S. military under attack? You've got these people who are the watchmen on the wall. And so they've got their responsibility is to monitor changes in diseases. And so they have a database to do that. And we saw how it soared several hundred percent, all these different types of cancer, some of them thousands of percent increase over the previous

five years. And so our response from the Pentagon is, well, all the data that we had before is just wrong. We're just going to wipe that data out. That's all you need to know. That's all you need to know. When these people called, show me your data. They do anything to hide it. They would do anything to purge it. He said, nobody explains why, um, some, all of a sudden people would decide to overreport COVID, uh, and they don't provide any evidence that that's happening. all of a sudden people decide to over-report COVID.

And they don't provide any evidence that that's happening. He says, I show the evidence that COVID vaccines are actually five times under-reported, he says. He said, take a look at the article from this same professor, Jeffrey Morris. His specialty is biostatistics, but in his spare time he writes articles trying to debunk my work, says Steve Kirsch. His article contains a hidden gift to me that he never noticed. Check out these two charts. Show those two charts there. He says, look at the column where the red marking is. You see how the numbers go up and up and up? The column is the daily number of deaths. He says, here's a key point. If the vaccination is a non-event, all the numbers in this column should be roughly the same,

since death is a random event. Instead, the death numbers per day are pretty much monotonically increasing over time, with one exception in the second chart. For example, on day one, we have 1,137 deaths, but on day 14, we have 2,660 deaths. That's a factor of 2.3 times growth in just 14 days. That's a huge increase. I mean, when you look at these trials,

when they do something, remember we've got a new drug that is supposed to help to slow the progression of Alzheimer's. And they say that it's 25% effective. 25% effective. And so they want to charge a fortune for it. So much so that if this goes through approval,

it'll bankrupt the medical care system just with that one particular drug. But that's over a 25% efficacy rate. You saw similar stuff with remdesivir as they cooked the books. As a matter of fact, they couldn't even show that it had anything to do with helping people recover. Fauci just changed the standard and said, well, they got better 30% faster. They got better 30% faster if they survived, but you didn't see any difference between the survival rate and non-survival rate. And you do all of this at a very high expense and a great risk of adverse effects, liver damage and other things because of remdesivir.

You know, one thing that Fauci and Rand Paul agree on, and that is that at LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back

as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee you own remdesivir stock and paul got his wife to buy the rim so he's not completely opposed to fauci by any means uh so anyway it's a huge increase if you go 2.3 times it's like a 230 increase okay uh he's paid morris he says is paid not to see any data that goes against the government narrative.

In the same way that Ben Shapiro is paid not to see any data that goes against the Trump narrative or the Republican narrative. You understand? We all know what their interests are. So he says, so what's going on here, says Steve Kerr. There's really only two possible explanations for this data. Either number one, the vaccine is instantly reducing your risk from all causes of death by a factor of two. And then it wanes over a factor of time and returns to normal at about 14 days. Or the other alternative is that the vaccine has a kill pattern that is progressively increasing and peaks after day 14 and then drops back to normal before going up again later at a second peak at five months out

as i point out in the article there's that uh there's that uh time again, five month delay after the vaccine. He says, so the death rate peaks at 17 days out, then falls back to the baseline of all cause mortality rates. You know, you still have Fauci out there, still pushing the booster, even on mainstream media, even on mainstream media, because, you know, that's really where Ben Shapiro is now. He's got somebody questioning him. But it doesn't seem to be working.

And listen to what he has to say. The updated, the bivalent COVID boosters, that they work about as well as the original boosters, but no better, which had, had of course been hoped that they would be kind of they would be more protective if you will when the researchers compared the immune immune responses of people who got a booster dose of the original shot to the people who got the updated bivalent covid booster shots um they they looked the way that the research shows is they looked about the same is that disappointing news it's not working in other words well if that is the case it's not that disappointing because

both of them work very well i might no they don't that those studies flat out why very good institutions and very good investigators both of whom i know well but they-reviewed, and the numbers in those studies were small. Neither was your approval of Remdesivir. What I want to indicate is the full data that we'll be getting, hopefully within the next couple of weeks, at the latest from the FDA, who will get the totality of the data that was submitted to them by the companies that did the study. So I think the jury is still out about that. But even if it turns out they're equivalent, they both did very well, which means there's

no reason not to and a very good reason to get your updated booster shot. It had me thinking about just how you have to, especially with the influenza vaccine, how you have to plan ahead, right? Yeah, you have to plan ahead. You have to get out your crystal ball, your Carnac crystal ball and say, I know what strain is coming six months from now. And you start manufacturing it, right? That's what they always did. That's one of the reasons why it was preposterous that you would even think that it was going to protect you. They don't even know what they're vaccinating against,

and they would admit that. But they would tell you to do it anyway. And when confronted with the truth, when confronted with the fact that this thing doesn't work, we're talking about the efficacy. They don't even want to talk about the safety. He just flat out lies. He's a politician. That's what politicians safety. He just flat out lies. He's a politician.

That's what politicians do. They just flat out lie. And he's an excellent politician. He is the most highly paid politician, bureaucrat in government for a reason. Sorry, says Steve Kirsch. Science is explaining all of the data. You don't get to ignore the evidence you don't like if you're a real scientist. But you know, you can always go to court and you can get them to keep hiding the data for you,

which is what I've experienced with these people. Here's another interesting data point. The black white COVID death rate has flipped. Why is that? Asked the Washington Post. Well, I don't know how they're going to try to twist and spin this truth, but I tell you what I think is happening. Now, they're looking at something and saying, well, that's kind of interesting. You know, we did have a higher death rate for black people than for white people, but

could it be, Washington Post, here's an idea. I know this is just a theory, but could it be that the white people were so much more receptive to the vaccine than black people were? This is not the first rodeo for black people. They've seen the Tuskegee experiments and other things like that. So it's like, I don't know. Maybe I'm going to wait and see what happens.

You white people go ahead first. And the white liberals are just ready to grab it. It's one of the reasons why they had Trump out there to try to urge the conservatives to do it. And he was successful with a lot of them in terms of getting them to take the jab. So maybe white people are more likely to die of COVID than black people. That's what they're saying.

So why is that now? Is the death rate going up for all these different types of things? Public Health Scotland says, we've got a rise in neonatal infant deaths. Babies right after they're born, dying right away. Big rise in it, and we need to investigate this. But they refuse to look at the vaccination status of the mothers.

They refuse to do it. Is it that it can't be correlated? Is it that they already know that they're correlated, and they don't want to show this? Well, it's even more reprehensible than that when you look at what they said. While Public Health Scotland is investigating what might be causing these excess deaths, they say, one thing they're not investigating is whether or not the mother was vaccinated with a COVID shot. But listen to what they had to say.

Public Health Scotland said its consultants had given, quote, careful consideration, unquote, to the, quote, potential benefits and harms of carrying out such an analysis as part of its probe into the tragic death of 39 infants, but concluded against doing it. Why? Here's the punchline. Why don't they want to look at the vaccination status of the mother? Because, quote, it was not possible to identify a scenario that would have resulted in a change

to public health policy or practice, given that the vaccination policy was already appropriately informed. We don't care. It's not possible. I mean, why bother to even look at that? Because if it is that, we don't care that babies are dying. We're not going to change our policy. There's no scenario, which means, here's a possible scenario, Public Health Scotland, a possible scenario would be

that your damn shot is killing babies. But you're not going to even bother to look at it, because even if that's the scenario, we're not going to stop shooting the mothers or the babies, for that matter. How about that scenario? How about the scenario that we have government knowingly killing people and we got limited hangout liars like Ben Shapiro covering for them for a thousand days. Give me a break.

Even if it is the jab, there's no way we're going to change our policy. It's fixed. Why is it fixed? Because it's the key. You've got to have the shot because the shot gives you the mandates. The shot gives you the IDs. The shot gives you the control. And the shot reduces the population. Depopulation and population control have been at the very center and the goal of all of this stuff from the beginning.

And we're not going to change it. There's nothing that you're going to tell us because they already knew it. In a statement, PHS added, there was also a risk that identifying the vaccination status of the mothers, even at an aggregate level, would result in harm to those individuals and others close to them. It would cause people to be vaccine hesitant. Remember? Remember that was the big problem that Rand Paul had with Fauci? You know, you're out there.

You're going to cause people to be hesitant to get these vaccines and all the other vaccines out there. A Scottish doctor, Malcolm Kendrick, said, Vaccines and vaccination have become a religious belief. No evidence needed. That's right. It is a cult. It is a religious belief. It is a dogma. There is no evidence to support their point of view. There's

plenty of evidence to support the opposite, but they will adhere to it religiously, idolatrously. Malcolm Kendrick, a skeptic and critic of the medical community for years, has challenged them on a lot of things. Cholesterol, heart disease. You know, there's a lot of people out there who don't believe that cholesterol is a... At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore

Bet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie A factor in heart disease. I'm not going to get into that argument, but this guy did. He said the great cholesterol con was a book that he put out. Now you would think that it would be pretty controversial, and it is. There's a lot of back and forth.

But people are allowed to discuss whether or not cholesterol is a key risk factor in heart disease. They're allowed to have that debate. But you're not allowed to have a debate about this, which he discovered. He apparently has never questioned vaccines in the past, but when he started questioning things about the COVID vaccine, he was totally unprepared for the responses and attacks that came, for even daring to ask questions. This is a guy who has taken on the medical establishment and the consensus view about cholesterol, but when he took on the COVID-19 vaccine, he couldn't believe what happened.

And so he wrote an op-ed piece. Here's a quote from it. He says, science to me is debate. Science is attacking ideas from all directions, no exceptions. Those ideas which cannot be destroyed may turn out to be correct. But if an idea is considered to be sacrosanct, if anyone questioning it is condemned as an unbeliever, why do they call people who question their climate change thing? They call us climate deniers. We're deniers of the faith.

We're infidels. I said, call me a climate infidel, please. Don't call me a denier. I'm not denying that there's climate. I'm denying your climate agenda. So call me an infidel because you're talking about a religion. If I can't question it, you're not talking about science. Anyway, so he says, if we have something, an idea that is considered sacrosanct,

and anyone questioning it is condemned as an unbeliever, then we do not have science, we have religion. So yes, in my opinion, vaccines and vaccination have become a religious belief. No evidence is needed. That's another thing that made this thing so easy to spot. The same people had sold the same approach, hide the data, and demonize anybody who questions their conclusions or who wants to see their data. Although we're not talking about science, we're talking about a religion.

With climate, with COVID, the rest of this stuff. The MacGuffins. MacGuffin twins. I have also tried saying absolutely nothing at all, he said. I still got accused of being an anti-vaxxer because I did not enthusiastically agree with criticizing someone who is believed to be an anti-vaxxer. This shows you that it's not just a religion, but it also has all the characteristics of Marxism and authoritarian governments, where you must denounce the enemies of the state. That's what this is about.

That's what the woke crowd is doing. You must be an anti-racist, and you must attack anybody who disagrees with us about CRT or LGBT or the vaccines or about climate. You can't just say, well, I'm neutral on this thing. I don't have an opinion. No, you must be on our side, and you must denounce the other side. That's Marxism.

That's totalitarianism. He says, maybe, in his essay, he says, maybe I should just attend this meeting. The meeting is the new frontier of RNA nanotherapeutics. And it's described this way in the PR press release for it. Quote, the RNA vaccines against COVID mark the beginning of a technological revolution that will transform the way that we treat disease and restore health. The new frontier of RNA nanotherapeutics presented by George and Angelina Kostas Research Center for Cardiovascular Nanomedicine will feature a discussion on the events that led to the RNA vaccine breakthrough and preview emerging RNA nanotherapeutics.

And it finishes by saying this, the potential of nanotechnology-enabled RNA therapeutics to enhance health is virtually limitless. And he says, well, there you go. Any doubts that I have will evidently evaporate evaporate it is a religion it is a very dangerous religion isn't it interesting that when you talked about this being a very dangerous nanotechnology when i talked about it uh being a genetic code injection and other things we were dismissed and criticized and purged for being conspiracy theorists. And yet now they embrace all of this stuff.

Now they embrace the fact, oh, we're going to modify your DNA. We're going to fix everything that's wrong with you. We're going to cure cancer. We're going to do this. We're going to do that. It's not any longer a conspiracy theory. It's not a bug. It's a feature to be bragged about. That kind of happened in

record time, didn't it? Yeah, let's just talk about the religious aspects of it. You know, when you look at the opening of the Commonwealth Games, just take a look at how the dark paganism that the West is now descending into. This is the opening of the 2022 Commonwealth Games. Oh yeah, got those horns there. This is very strange. Oh, there's the sacred bull up there. It looks like he's on fire.

And there's chains that are attached to the people who are pulling him. Fire coming out of his mouth. These people are having to pull him. These people are in, you know, they've got like smudge marks all over their faces. Their hair is disheveled. There's something that is pursuing them. They're running, yeah. Birmingham 2022, the Commonwealth Games.

Isn't that great? This is a society that we're creating. Birmingham 2022, the Commonwealth Games. Isn't it great? This is a society that we're creating. This is what the elites want. They want to unleash hell and chaos on us. Before we go to break, I want to thank some of the people who have left tips and comments on Rockfin. Thank you very much, Brian Potty. That's very generous. I appreciate that. And Angus Mustang, thank you very much. He says, Fauci should be modeling orange jumpsuits. Yeah. Thank you for all you do to put your show together. Truly excellent. Thank you. Appreciate that, Angus. Igor, thank you for the tip. He says, have you seen the new movie, The Real Anthony Fauci? Is it possible to get RFK Jr. on your show? Thank you for all your hard work. God bless. Well, you know, I should try again.

He did agree to, his staff agreed to come on my show, and then he canceled at the last minute. And so we contacted him thinking that maybe it was some kind of an issue with scheduling or something like that. But they were not interested in rescheduling. So I guess, uh, for whatever reason, maybe I don't think that he's concerned about my content. I just think that he doesn't think the show has far enough reach.

So if you want to help me get RFK Jr. on, uh, help to push the show, we can get some view count numbers up there and some other things. He can't see the download figures on podcasts. So the only thing you see is what's on the video channels. And by the way, let me just say something. We have in the past, you know, the three-hour show. I know that's a very long show it's one of the reasons why people look at the podcasts more often and it's one of the

reasons why we do cut out two or three things in addition to an interview each day to put them on the video channels but um i used to take the time and it was a very time-consuming thing, to create an outline. And we have a better way to do that now. And it was just taking me too much time. And things got skewed because of the, you know, I was putting it on the podcast as well, but because the podcast has some commercials inserted into it, that kind of messed up the time codes.

But we've got a different way of doing it now and so what I've started doing the last couple of days in case you haven't noticed it's in the description of the podcast as well as in the descriptions of the videos which is really key and so I've got a very detailed outline it's got a lot more detail than we did before. I don't go into as much detail about each topic, but it's got more indexes into the topics. For example, if I talk to somebody for a half hour or an hour in an interview, there'll be a bunch of different indexes into that interview by the topics that we discussed even in that interview.

So that is now on the descriptions for the videos, descriptions on the podcast and on Odyssey. It's the only one of the alternate video channels that I know of. Maybe Gab does it. We haven't posted the stuff on Gab TV. We had problems. We tried it when they first started and there were some issues. We'll go back and try it again.

Rumble doesn't do it. Huge Tube doesn't do it.. Rumble doesn't do it. HugeTube doesn't do it. BitChute doesn't do it. But Odyssey does look at the time codes and give you a clickable index into the video. So if you want to utilize the table of contents and you want to watch some content, you can go to Odyssey and you can actually click on the on the you

know the number that's there and it'll take you right into the video which is nice YouTube does that but it's YouTube's got a lot of functionality in addition to the censorship so that's but you Odyssey is catching up with them North flaw thank you very much for the tip he says hope you enjoyed your trip So, uh, that's a, but, uh, you, uh, Odyssey is catching up with him. Uh, North law. Thank you very much for the tip. He says, hope you enjoyed your trip. You should take a day here and there to relax. It's good for your health and mental and physical.

Yeah. It, uh, I need to do that. So I'm, um, working seven days a week here. So, um, I'm going to have to do that at some point. We're going to come back and I do want to talk a little bit more about, there's a couple more things I want to talk about with the vaccines and then we're

going to talk about what's going on with some of the debates and the elections. There's been some updates to that and we're getting pretty close to the elections. I believe it's Tuesday, not this Tuesday, I think it's the second Tuesday, so I think it's the eighth. At LiveScoreBet,

we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate

the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gamblingcare.ie of november that we're going to have the elections we'll be right back The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for listening.

Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The David Knight Show dot com. uh tony arteman is going to be joining us at the bottom of the next hour but before he comes on i've got more i want to talk about with the vaccines as well as with the election. The government is in denial about the risks of these vaccines. That's something that's actually said by a politician in the UK, not in the US. It wasn't said in the US Congress. There will be no debate in the US Congress about this type of stuff. As a matter of fact, the adverse effects of these vaccines will not be mentioned in any of the election debates either. They will criticize, the GOP will criticize the other party over mandates and mandates alone.

Not over the, well, they'll criticize them over the lockdowns, but they won't talk about the fact who paid them to do the lockdowns and continue to pay them as they were doing the lockdowns. So that really is the elephant in the room for the GOP. What about these toxic shots? Are you going to even talk about that? You know, when we talk about the mandates, there's an example out of Austin. You have a Texas woman waits on hold with 9-11 for 15 minutes as her husband dies from a heart attack. They've got a staffing shortage there. I wonder, is it

because they fired the people that didn't get the jabs? Is that really, is that maybe part of this? A woman in Leander near Austin, Texas says that she was left on hold by 9-11 dispatcher for 15 minutes as her husband died, bringing further attention to a staffing shortage at the dispatch center where the response times are well above the national average they said 64 percent of 9-11 calls uh were nationwide were answered within 15 seconds um uh i'm sorry that's that's nation uh that's what happened in austin 64 percent were answered within 15 seconds compared to 90% nationally. So significantly less. She was on hold.

So she was featured in a campaign ad for a Travis County judge candidate. She said she asked her father-in-law, and again, the judge, the county judge in Texas is the highest elected official. It's not somebody who actually has a position at a court, a courtroom as a judge. No, that's what they call the person who is the highest elected official in the county. Here in Tennessee, they call that office the mayor, the county mayor. But in Texas, they call it the county judge. Think about Judge Roy Bean. You know what I mean.

Anyway, we don't have anybody that rules like that anymore. But in a campaign for judge, this guy has got the ad there. She said she asked her father-in-law to also call 9-11 so that she wouldn't lose her place in line. His call took more than 10 minutes. It took him 10 minutes, and then 9-11 realized that he was in a different county, so they transferred him, and it took another three minutes. But mine was a minimum of 15, if not 20 minutes, and her husband died.

You know, we were told a year ago as they were pushing out these mandates and pushing out people out of medical staff, people who had worked there through the entire so-called pandemic. So, well, now it's got new rules. You're going to get the vaccine or you're not going to work here anymore. And they said, well, you know, it's going to create massive shortages. No well we don't care we really don't care it was never about medicine it was always about politics in the same way that they would add a requirement and tell you at the time they're adding a new requirement well you know in two months or three months from now we're going to add yet another requirement and then when

that time came and they added that requirement because because, you know, it's an emergency, so we're going to wait another two or three months, when they would add that next step, doing it with disruption and chaos and doing it iteratively, doing it from the inside, as Fauci said. So when they'd add the next step, two or three months from now, they would tell you what the next step was going to be, because it was just a march into slavery. Titanium dioxide particles are found to be frequently present in face masks. I mean, we're not talking about, you know, the bandana or the handkerchief or the sweaty t-shirt that you're putting over your face. We're talking about the so-called legitimate scientific N95 masks frequently have

titanium dioxide in it. You know, it's almost like everything that they prescribed for us was totally wrong. And it's almost like everything that was safe, effective, and cheap was proscribed. You will do what is going to harm your health, but you will not do what I don't want you to do. So, you know, when we look at this, how many times did I say this? How unhealthy it is. You're restricting oxygen, you're increasing carbon dioxide. It doesn't work. I talked about, you know, years ago, I said, look at this 2002 study done by the woman who discovered Parvo in Australia, the scientist who discovered that.

She did a study back in 2002. She said, I noticed that a lot of physicians and others who are working in operating rooms didn't wear masks. And so I was just kind of wondering how effective these things were. So she did a study. What she found was that even whatever they caught, they didn't catch anything after 20 minutes. The N95 mask was so saturated with spittle that it would produce spit particles that would contain viral particles in it, produced smaller ones that would travel farther and remain airborne longer.

So it would actually exacerbate it from the exhalation point. And then we had this last year, we had new research. That was 2002. Then this last year, we had somebody look at it, a German scientist, who looked at it from the inhalation standpoint. And he said the same thing. These saturated masks are producing particles when You know, when you suck in the air through them, they're producing smaller particles and those smaller particles go farther. They go down deeper into your lungs and they exacerbate any infection. So it's actually making you more

sick. It's actually making it more transmissible, if you understand their theory of viruses. So there's not an argument at all to be had for it. And now it turns out they have titanium dioxide, which is very dangerous to your health. They said wearing face masks is an important and widely applied public health measure to control the pandemic.

And so they have to declare that they are true believers in this religion. A recent study testing several batches of face masks intended to be put on sale as personal protective equipment showed that 70% of the examined face masks contained titanium dioxide in quantities ranging from 100 to 2,000 milligrams per kilogram. This suggests that titanium dioxide is commonly applied in textiles of face masks as in a wide variety of other textiles. So, you know, maybe these are the purpose built a face mask. Maybe these aren't the N 95, but, um, anyway, uh, the, uh, I want to talk a little bit about

what is happening with the elections. Uh, so, uh, instead of taking a break, let's just go straight into it and let's talk about what's going on with all of the baby elephants. Yes, we have a parade of candidates that has been paraded over the airwaves here as they're debating what is going to be happening. And we got the elections only about 10 or 11 days out. And the debate between Fetterman and Oz is a

gift that just keeps giving. And you know, I played for you yesterday. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival,

we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee the the comments going back and forth where he reversed himself, got caught changing his position, Fetterman did, on fracking. I guess he realized, wait a minute, now I'm running for state office in Pennsylvania, and this is a state that is dependent on this.

Maybe I should change my position. But what I didn't see yesterday before the program, this is why I'm going back to revisiting it, because I thought this was, a lot of people picked this up yesterday afternoon. This is absolutely hilarious. This is the way the debate started, in case you haven't seen it by now.

This is his opening response in the debate as Lieutenant governor. You're running for a seat that could decide the balance of power in Washington. What qualifies you to be a U S Senator? You have 60 seconds. Hi, good night, everybody. I'm running to serve Pennsylvania. Yeah, it's lights out. It's over.

It's over it's over man it's over fetterman's odds of winning tanked in the betting markets after the debate uh liberals say yeah his performance was abysmal i mean you you know how bad it is if drudge can't find an angle to try to cover up for it at one point fetterman was asked about his position on fracking. And the debate moderator noting that in a 2018 interview that he completely opposed the practice, and this is what he had to say. I want to clarify something. You're saying tonight that you support fracking,

that you've always supported fracking, but there is that 2018 interview that you said, quote don't support fracking at all so how do you square the two I do support fracking and I don't I don't I support fracking and I stand and I do support fracking. I was in a televised debate when I ran for Congress and it was the Republican candidate who had gotten elected in 1994 in a Republican district did not. You know, it was a safe thing for her. She could only lose if she got into a debate. And so the Democrats have put up a sacrificial lamb and, uh, NPR wanted to do anything they could, uh, you know, PBS, anything they could to try to increase the Democrats chances to win. So they, uh, said, you know, we could have a debate

if we include the two third party candidates in there. And so they included me and then they included a woman who was from, um, the, well, they called it the natural law party, which I thought was a good name. I thought it was a better name than libertarian because at the time everybody thought we were liberals and there were some liberals in there, social liberals and everything. Not me, but, uh, you know, oh, you're from the liberal parties. Like, no, no, no. Classical liberal. Yes. But, uh, you know, oh, you're from the liberal parties. Like, no, no, no classical liberal. Yes. But, uh, you don't know what that means either. Do you? Um, anyway, the, uh, the natural law party was a group of people who were into, um, meditation and, um, hopping around with their legs crossed. They call them flying Schwammies

because if you watch them meditating, they would, um, get into like this thumping thing and they would, they could get a, you know, a couple of feet off the ground or something as part of their meditation thing. Kind of weird, but they were up in the mountains in North Carolina and they decided they would run a congressional candidate and every one of the districts because you've got a party on the ballot that's you were able to run candidates you know without them having to apply individually so their candidate got the very first question and it was kind of like that and they asked her about vouchers and she was like uh-, and she couldn't think of anything to say, had absolutely no clue what to say. It was so embarrassing to be a part of that whole process.

I don't know about the Democrat, but I certainly felt humiliated to be there. It's like, but the she had no clue they were talking about educational vouchers none whatsoever um and and she was she was trying to get the moderator to give her a clue as to whether the moderator wasn't budging on it it's kind of like that Aleppo question that was asked to Jerry Gary Johnson uh the people at MSNBC and he goes Aleppo Aleppo what's an Aleppo uh and that's what she was saying. What is a woman? What is a candidate? I don't know. Anyway, so he was asking about it.

And basically, his response when he was asked about fracking was, what the frack? I don't know. But it wasn't just 2018. He said it repeatedly over and over again for several years, going back to 2016. Several incidents of him saying it between 2016 2018 but anyway as the press is pointing out this is from the daily wire fetterman proved he simply was not cognitively able to serve in the senate and that's the issue. You know, the Democrats are trying to make his stroke and his disability a reason to vote for him. You know, we all have different things we struggle with.

But, you know, this is something that affects his ability to do the job. But let's not pay any attention to that because the Democrats, especially the establishment Democrats, are looking for people who are cognitively impaired. They're looking for voters, but especially candidates like Biden, like Fetterman, who will just do what they're told. You know, you just put it up on the teleprompter and given enough time, they'll kind of stumble along and read what's on the teleprompter you put in front of them, more or less, to kind of get the point across. But they just are looking for suits that are going to do what they say, or in the case of Fetterman, hoodies that will do what they say.

So he had a giant teleprompter that was there and um you know both camps agreed to do that uh so um uh he said uh at one point in the debate in attacking oz he says uh how can a man you know with with 10 gigantic mention has am willing to talk about willing wage for anybody. Imagine a signal mom trying with two children, trying to raise with them. After the debate, CNN host Allison Camerotto said that she was unsettled by the spectacle. She says, I've interviewed him many times as a tenant governor.

He sounded different before the stroke. In the interviews, he was much more sort of clear spoken than what I'm hearing. David Axelrod, who was a Democrat strategist, senior advisor to Obama, wrote on Twitter, he said Fetterman needed to show he sufficiently recovered. This debate surely did not help. Chris Cuomo, who is now back on the air, not at CNN, but at News Nation, said he's clearly dealing with health issues

that affect his ability to process and his ability to speak. Clearly, fitness for office is going to be on the table. Well, you know, it was going back and forth, and Democrats, as I said, they've made a virtue. It's a selling point to vote for a guy who's had a stroke because he's struggling. And there are significant differences between the two of them, even though I don't like Oz at all.

I mean, he's maintained his dual citizenship in Turkey. He did a stint in the military to maintain that citizenship and all the rest of the stuff. He says that he will get rid of his Turkish citizenship if he is elected before he takes office. office because you know he needs to do that in order to be able to uh have access to classified material does that make you feel good about oz i don't feel good about either one of these guys frankly and uh bablin b essentially said the same thing um bablin b said uh maybe they they quoted some people who uh uh you know some theoretical uh pennsylvania voters said uh maybe we just shouldn't have representation in the senate i think maybe 99 senators is enough maybe it's too many uh do we really need to have one of these guys uh yeah after seeing that debate i don't even think we need a senator, said a local steelworker.

Those folks don't seem all that bright if you ask me. So pundits on the left are praising Fetterman for having a beating heart and functioning lungs while having the letter D after his name. Pundits on the right, however, insist that Oz is the best choice for Pennsylvania since he can complete a sentence and has a last name that makes him sound like an all-powerful wizard. Not only that, but he's got not one, but two citizenships. And he's pals with Klaus Schwab and all the rest of this stuff, right? So I said, well, maybe we can just have one senator this year, 99 or enough. I think,

yeah, maybe 99 or too many i don't know maybe maybe it's way too many uh based on what is happening in this country but you know there was one debate where um even though i uh you know when when you look at what was not said and things where they did not go at least uh tutor dixon and debating gretchen whitmer at least she knows how she's very sharp on the issues at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

And she can certainly take on the press. By the way, here's Tudor Nixon tutoring the media. This is pretty good. She's in a media scrum there, and they're asking her questions real fast. And she answers it concisely and goes to the next question. Listen to this. Tudor, Jonathan O. Stingbridge, Michigan. You claim the governor forced people to get vaccines.

Can you clarify that comment? Michigan never had a mandate. I was talking about her Vax to Normal program that said if we wanted to have our freedoms and liberties back, that we had to get to a certain percentage of people that were vaxxed. Tudor, Zach Gorchow from the Onward Service. You've been critical of schools remaining closed. But as governor, what would you have done for school districts their school boards decided we are going to remain in a virtual posture

instead of going to in person what could you have done? We saw other states like Florida that said we are going to have schools in person that that's critical and that's what we should have done in the state of Michigan we saw schools we saw other states opening their schools and the children were safe and they ended up having much less learning loss than the state of Michigan. Kusis Dixon, Samantha Rich from the Michigan Daily. Governor Whitmer kind of stressed her record of bipartisan collaboration and I'm just wondering what your plan is to work across the aisle. Yeah, it's interesting that she

talks about that because there are actually legislators that she's never met so I would sit down with our legislators and meet with them regularly. Craig Mauger from the Detroit News. Governor Whitmer asked you at one point, do you really think the books are more dangerous than guns? You didn't directly respond to that. What's your response to that question? I think there are dangers all over for our children. I don't rank one as different than the other.

I want to make sure our kids are safe no matter what. Tudor, I'm Ariana Hayman from the Oakland Post. You criticized your opponent for failing to fix the roads. So I'm wondering how you plan to fix it and how you plan to pay for them Yeah We've talked about this that we want to make sure that we work with the legislature to get the road funding in there Look, she had a budget that she's increased by nearly 20 billion dollars and she wasn't able to find the money So I want to sit with the our legislature and work with them to make sure that that is prioritized in the future

I'm tutor Anna Favelsky, the Michigan Daily. I was wondering if you could clarify what content you would want removed from public school curricula and how that would impact sex education in schools. If you've been talking to parents, they are concerned about the content that is pornographic in our schools. Yeah, maybe we start there. Maybe we get rid of the pornography in the schools. Maybe we stop doing the types get rid of the pornography in the schools maybe we stop doing the types of things that if somebody didn't have the mantle of being a teacher or a school board member we would put them in jail now maybe we start with that yeah you notice how uh you know the antithesis what we see in most of these debates uh If nothing else, she's pretty sharp. And I thought her answers on all those questions were spot on.

I wish that, again, the GOP has decided overall that it's not a strategy for them to take on the vaccine. That's my big concern because I think that is the central issue right now of so many different things. But there are other issues. There certainly would be a massive, massive, massive improvement for the state of Michigan if they were to get rid of the ice queen, Whitmer. So going back to the Oz debate and some of the issues

that they were talking about, again, I thought this was an interesting, smart take from Mehmet Oz. And again, I don't trust this guy. smart take, uh, from Mehmet Oz. And again, I don't trust this guy. I mean, he's a Davos globalist. Um, he's, you know, he lives in New Jersey. He's running in Pennsylvania. He's a Turkish citizen, all the rest of this stuff. But at least the answers that he gave on some of these issues were good.

Um, he said, uh, Democrat John Fetterman shoots too low when it comes to wages. Again, just like, uh, just looking at the argument there, regardless of, um, you know, we, we long ago lost the opportunity, I guess, I don't know if there's any third party candidates in Pennsylvania or not, uh, but, uh, they did have a good candidate, uh, at the primary level. She came in third. She couldn't get Trump's endorsement. Uh, and, um, she, you know, had two Republicans who are Davos people replacing, uh, to me,

the current incumbent Republican Senator who is also Davos. And guess what? Trump chose between one of the two Davos candidates. What does that tell you? But anyway, typical of the Democrats, what they'll do is they'll focus on raising minimum wage. They always want to ration what is there. They never want to have a bigger pie, and they want to be the ones who are cutting up the pieces and handing them out. They don't want to have, as JFK said, a rising tide that lifts all boats. They don't want the boats to be lifted. They will tell you what you can do with your boat.

So Oz said Fetterman shoots too low when it comes to wages. He says he wants a fierce economic agenda that will boost wages for working and middle class Americans to historic levels well beyond the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour and even higher than what the Democrats have proposed, the magic $15 an hour thing. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. He says, I don't think you should have to survive on $7.25 an hour. I want the minimum wage as high as it can go. I want us all getting paid a lot more than $15.

He said the goal of lawmakers should not be bottoming out wages for Americans with federal minimum wage hikes, but instead opening Pennsylvania's energy sector to increase the number of jobs across the state and boost wages in the industry. And that's exactly right. So, you know, when you look at this, just like with Trump, about the only thing that Trump got right, not the border, not anything else, but the only thing he got right was energy policy. With Oz there and with it being Pennsylvania, you could expect that he's probably going to be right on energy policy, at least. There's not anything that Fetterman would be right about. That's typically the case. I find that I

might agree with like 25 or 30 percent of what the Republicans say or do. I agree with zero percent with what the Democrats do. So, so we also, they also talked about abortion and the thing that has set the left on fire. And this is why this is worth talking about this, uh, regardless of these two candidates, the issues are the thing I had somebody, by the way, um, put a comment on my show a day or two ago on bitChute. I said, oh, so we should praise the Davos people when they do the right thing? I said, well, that's an interesting take away from a three-hour show. I've never said anything like that. I didn't say it in that show.

I've never said it. I've talked about the fact that you want to focus on principles and on policies more than on people. Oh, well, you support Davos people. These trolls, I tell you what. Dishonest, they're not even worth responding to. But the bottom line is that we should make this about the policies. And so that's why, even though I don't have anybody that I support in this Pennsylvania Senate race,

I think the issues that were brought up and the responses that were brought up are worth talking about because we keep seeing these things coming up over and over again. So when you talk about abortion, what the left is very concerned about is the fact that Oz said that the abortion decision is something that should be between women, doctors, and local politicians. In other words, this is not a federal issue, is what he's saying. And boy, they get upset about that.

Now, he was right about that. And again, you know, when somebody is right about a policy, you agree with it. And the bottom line is that murder, which is what we're talking about here, is something that should not be federalized, that we don't want to federalize law enforcement. We don't want to have it centrally controlled. You want to centrally control law enforcement? Take a look at the FBI.

Well, of course, the Democrats do like that because it's become a politicized bureaucracy operating in the name of law enforcement. And so if we're going to look at this, we have to understand that it isn't just the woman and the doctor because there's another life involved there. There's another person involved there. And he just kind of glossed over that.

You mean local government should make a decision? Yes, you're talking about taking the life of a person in order to perhaps save the life of a mother, or just because she wants to? Because she wants to? Seriously? So the idea that this would, she wants to? Seriously? So, the idea that this would, because

you're talking about taking the life of a child, this is something that constitutionally and even pragmatically belongs to local government. Now, what he should do in response to all this,

which they won't do because they won't go after this pandemic thing, I've said this yesterday, I said, whenever they say, I don't want government involved in this decision about abortion, say, okay, well, then you're going to stop all of the vaccine mandates and you're going to stop all the other mandates about this because that truly is about my body. That truly is. There's absolutely nobody else involved in this. Oh, well, we're involved as third parties by being around you. No, you're not.

If your vaccine works, you're protected. If your mask works, you're protected. And you keep telling us that your mask and your vaccines work. So go away. Leave me alone. It's my decision and my doctor's decision. But you want to punish me and my doctor if we don't make the decision to obey your non-scientific prescriptions. Oz maintained his moderate position

that the federal government should stay out of abortion and reiterated that he supported the repeal of Roe v. Wade so that states could decide for themselves. Fetterman continued the Democrat Party trend of offering zero restrictions for abortion. So in the debate, Oz says, Fetterman on the debate stage here said that he would demand federally mandated rules for all states to follow that would allow abortion at 38 weeks.

38 weeks? I mean, we're talking about 36 weeks to have a baby. Are we talking a couple of weeks after delivery? So he would allow abortions at 38 weeks. He would allow it on the delivery table. He would force it to be subsidized by taxpayers across the country, no matter what their personal beliefs are. He says that's radical.

That's extreme. That is out of touch with what the average voter in Pennsylvania believes is appropriate. When asked if he would support the current bill from Senator Lindsey Graham in South Carolina that would issue a federal abortion ban, Oz stood by his original position that he supported the end of Roe v. Wade so that states could decide for themselves. And he did not say whether or not he would support the bill if it was offered as a federal restriction. And I say that constitutionally, this is a decision that belongs to the states from a pragmatic standpoint that is better addressed at the states. Because if you try to force this from Washington, if you try to protect life by force in Washington,

when you have governments like California and New York, they are going to help people to get around that. You're not going to be able to effectively prohibit it from Washington with a federal law. But what will happen if you make this a federal issue, if you federalize it again, that was the important thing about what the Supreme Court did, what Clarence Thomas and Scalia did. The important thing was that they got something that the federal government does not have any legitimate authority to regulate. They got it away from the federal government. And if you give that power back to them like Lindsey Graham wants to do, then it won't be long before they will do exactly what Fetterman wants.

And they'll be back to forcing you to pay for abortions. to do, then it won't be long before they will do exactly what Fetterman wants. And there'll be back to forcing you to pay for abortion. There'll be back to allowing abortions and without any restrictions. That's what the Democrats will do when they get power and they will have power at some point in time, and they will do that. You will not be able to stop it from Washington, but they'll be able to stop you from stopping it in Washington if you do that. Now, that law, if that law were put in by Lindsey Graham and others, that law should be overturned by the Supreme Court.

I would hope that they would do that. But again, the Supreme Court is also a political animal. The Supreme Court will also change. Now, while we're talking about South Carolina, this is an interesting takeaway from the debate in South Carolina for the office of governor. This was about the issue of marriage. That the court could also reverse the gay marriage precedent that had passed.

South Carolina law currently bans gay marriage as well as the state constitution. If the court reverses the gay marriage ruling that it has in the past and throws it back to the states, would you support legislation that would eliminate the ban on gay marriage and also allow voters to vote to rescind the amendment in the Constitution? Well, gay marriage is, it is, in our Constitution, it is not allowed. And under our state law, it is not allowed. I would follow state law, whatever the state law is. But maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I think that marriage ought to be between

a man and a woman. Well, there you go. And that's his opinion. But the law is the law. And they have a constitutional law in the state of South Carolina. They have a law. They have a constitution that defines what marriage is. And the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overrule that.

And that was the appropriate response to Roe v. Wade as well, and it would have saved a lot of the 60-plus million lives that were lost over the last 50 or so years. He was absolutely right about that, and good for him for not being uh not kowtowing to the political virtue signaling to the political left during these people uh that's what the law says and and then he supported in principle marriage uh but when we look at what's going to happen there with this situation in pennsylvania the one thing that has there there's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking of why did they allow him to go out on stage with this? And as I said yesterday, why did his wife allow him to continue to run after he had that devastating stroke? Same question was raised even by Rush

Limbaugh when Joe Biden was running as a candidate. Now we look at the situation that he's in. Why would his wife put him through that? Why would she put him on display to make him look foolish? And that is the real question. Why would his staff do this? A lot of people are saying, well, they were very clever in what they did. They delayed it, delayed it, delayed it. They only had one debate, and That's the one and only debate. And they put that debate up, even though half of the Pennsylvania vote-by-mail ballots have already been cast.

So even though everybody's looking at this, and even though they're doing their polling, that doesn't matter if the people have already cast their votes. And most of the Democrats have cast their votes. That's a hangover, by the way, of what President Trump put in. Remember we had to vote by mail because we had this amazing pandemic. Never seen anything like that before in the history of the world. And so we have to vote by mail. And they're still voting by mail because President Trump,

who set the precedents for all these different things, just like he did, you know, the, uh, gun control by executive order and all the rest of this stuff set precedents for stimulus checks and universal basic income set,

set stimulus, set a precedent for the mail-in ballots. And they're still doing that. So, um, again, if, um,

if, uh, president Trump's candidate doesn't win, you can thank President Trump for the mail-in election. Nearly half of all the vote-by-mail ballots in Pennsylvania had already been cast before Tuesday night's debate. Fetterman had sought to avoid a debate. His campaign had restricted his public appearances, and when he finally agreed to one, Democrats sought to delay the debate until ballots were already being cast by mail, since Democrats are much more likely to use that method, and more of the party's vote would already have been cast. The Wall Street Journal noted in Editorial Tuesday that the result of the debate

might not matter given the timing and the vote by mail. Similar concerns have already arisen in other states because, you know, all the states are now doing vote by mail all the time. And with all of the kerfuffle about how corrupt the 2020 election was and how you had all of these mules who are voting and stuffing ballots by mail and all the rest of this stuff. Did the Republican Party do anything in those 60 days between that first election and the runoff in Georgia, which happened on January the 5th, the day before the catastrophic January the 6th? No, everybody was only focused on Trump. They didn't care about the fact that you lost two Senate seats because of this vote-by-mail fraud,

that you did nothing as a party, that Trump did nothing to stop. Again, as Ty Cobb said, he's a man who is incapable of acting except in his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge. In New York, a lot of interesting statements by Kathy Hochul in her debate with Lee Zeldin. In terms of locking up criminals, she responded with multiple statements by Lee Zeldin about their policies for bail and how criminals are being let loose. She responded by saying, I don't know why that's so important to you. Well, you know, crime is one of the reasons why he's soaring in the polls and she is declining in the polls. So that's why it's important to him because it's important to the voters and she doesn't really care about safety. So rising crime levels in New York, especially in New York City.

Hochul has expressed support for the no bail law that was signed by Cuomo. She wrote in an op-ed piece, she said the reforms were successful. Since the law was passed, we have seen a distressing increase in shootings and homicides. Well, so it's successful, but you're seeing more shootings and homicides. Is that because that's what you want? You know, we just had this case of a guy on the New York subway shoved somebody down onto the tracks intentionally.

This is somebody who has already done 20 years in jail for attempted murder, you know, decades ago. He's in his early 40s, so he was very young when he attempted murder and went to jail for 20 years for that. But things are very different now in New York, very different in a lot of different places, very different because George Soros, along with the Democrat Party, have decided that they want chaos. And no matter how many times the police arrest people, the Soros district attorneys and the Democrat judges

are letting these criminals right back out on the streets. That was by design. In 2016, after the election and the transition period, you had Barack Obama and Eric Holder, who was the attorney general, openly strategized about how their focus was going to be on state attorneys general and on district attorneys. And they were going to have a lot of money by George Soros to put those people in office. And so you've got people in L.A. like Gascon, people in San Francisco like Chezza Boudin, who was recalled.

But of course, they played games to keep the recall from happening in L.A. and across the country. This is the type of thing that's happening. And this so-called bail reform, which is not reform at all. So this guy, this subway shover, was out and loose. His family has even posted stuff saying, if you see this guy, call the police. They know how dangerous he is.

His family said he's been arrested more than two dozen times. Well, why is he still on the street? That's the issue that Lee Zeldin brought up, and that's why Kathy Hochul said, I don't know why this is important to you. His response should have been, why is it important for you to have no law or order? Why is it important for you to facilitate crimes?

Because this is being done from the inside. It's being done with chaos, and it's being done iteratively. Everything they do. You could say that about everything these people do, whether you're talking about schools, whether you're talking about crime, whether you're talking about the medical martial law, everything is from the inside creating disruption and chaos and doing it incrementally, iteratively increasing it. I had a listener who sent me a story, Rolf, sent me a story about what's happening in Democrat-run Houston.

There the county judge is about 30 years old. She's somebody who's a foreign citizen, you know, didn't get her American citizenship until just before she ran for office there. I mean, she's from Central America, but she was, she came into this country and she was groomed by the left and she went to Ivy League schools and that type of thing and rose to the top of the Democrat Party. And she has, you know, Houston is becoming like New York in terms of crime, worse in many respects. And so in this particular story that was sent to me by Rolf, there was an individual who was already indicted in jail.

He's a defendant. He hadn't had his trial yet, but he's in jail for capital murder. He and a couple of other accomplices killed two individuals, shot them point blank, and then held a gun to the head of a mother with a two-month-old child. So you kill two people, you hold a gun to the head of a mother with a two-year-old child. And he was released on $9,000 bail. This is not his first rodeo.

Just five years ago, in 2017, he was arrested for some other crimes, but he was released on a $150,000 bail. It wasn't even capital murder. He's graduating up to bigger crimes. So he was released on a $150,000 bail. He violated the bail, skipped it, whatever. They bring him back in and arrest him again. And the judge, instead of going up on the bail, which you would expect, right?

Somebody violates their bail conditions, wouldn't you think that they would make it more stringent? Instead, the bail went from $150,000 down to $50,000. And then five years later, when he's arrested for capital murder, they take it down to $9,000. This is the corruption and the degeneration of the legal system. It's what we're seeing here. And, uh, you know, you don't even have to give somebody bail. If it's a murder case, you can withhold it completely when it comes to the coronavirus, uh, vaccines for children. Again, that's the only way that any of this stuff is going to come up.

And, you know, Zeldin, not going to harangue her. He's not going to talk about the vaccines in general. They're afraid to do that. But they will talk about the mandates, and they will talk about the mandates for children. They even, for the most part, avoid the mandates for adults and for living your life and for having a job or staying in the military, whatever. They want to avoid all of those things, but they will talk about it when it comes to kids. And so Hochul said she would not mandate the vaccines, the Trump shots for children at this time. Zeldin said never. But again, what about the MMR? the vaccines, the Trump shots for children at this time?

Zeldin said, never. But again, what about the MMR? What about the 11 kids per year on average that are dying from the MMR shots? What about all the adverse effects from flu shots and all the rest of these? Over 30 years, you've had 324,000 adverse effects, and that's not even counting autism. They don't consider autism to be an effect of these vaccines. So again, it's only about childhood mandates. That's the limited hangout that we have. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk to Tony Ardman. And we're going to talk about some of the financial things that are happening. So stay with us.

We'll be right back. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God

that is what we have in common that is what they want to take away their most powerful weapons are isolation deception intimidation they desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us it's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com All right.

Joining us now is Tony Arterman. I haven't talked to Tony since we got back, but Tony did a great job along with the guard and many other people that work with Tony and Tony produced for guard some of the stuff as well. You know, running the, the distribution for it and that type of thing. So I really do appreciate that,

Tony. Thank you so much. I've seen nothing but compliments about what you guys did while we were gone. So thank you so much. And of course, Tony has wise wolf dot gold, and he has graciously set up David Knight dot gold to direct you there. So he knows that you came through here and he supports the program. So thank you very much, Tony.

It's great to have you back on. Oh, great to be here, David. Always an honor, sir. Yeah, there was an interesting couple of stories today on Zero Hedge. They had one from Shift Gold talking about Rubini, the guy that there's a great deal of respect for him in the financial markets because he predicted the situation with the housing market. He predicted it in 2006, what subsequently happened in 2007 and 2008. And so when Rubini talks, people listen.

And what he is warning about is an imminent dollar crash and massive inflation. And so I think it was Michael Meharry who writes for Peter Schiff's, uh, Schiff gold, uh, Michael Meharry picked up on this and said, look, I've been telling you, you know, it's going to be inflation and the collapse of the dollars. I should buy gold.

And he's, I agree with him. I think that's absolutely right. Uh, did you see that article from, uh, uh, about Rubini and what he's predicting? There's a couple of articles. A lot. It's not just a Schiff gold. It's talking about, there's a lot of different people. he's predicting. There's a couple of articles. It's not just Schiff Gold that's talking about it. There's a lot of different people. No, it's not.

It's everywhere. And I think for the longest time, gold bugs have been, we've been predicting this. This is imminent. It's coming. It's just always tomorrow. But the problem is, it's like the term Tina. There is no alternative until now for the dollar.

And that's where the BRICS nations come in. And of course, Putin weaponizing energy when sanctions came in from Biden. All this is changing the geopolitical situation for currencies, as you know, David. And I think the reason that the dollar has been able to be massively inflated and remain the world's reserve currency is there hasn't been any other choices but but again you can see nations moving away from the dollar quietly and going into things like the yuan again and we're seeing this all over the world and it's happening uh one day at a time but us gold bugs have been talking about this for a very long time as you know and i think that uh're going to have to prepare for a massive shift in our paradigm, how we see global currencies. Yeah. And of course, he identifies a lot of different things. He talks about the fecklessness of the Fed and how they're going to flip and inflation is going to win. But he said there's a lot of geopolitical risks as well. And he describes

it. He said there's going to be a confluence of mega risks. That's his term, mega risks. And that is possible confrontations with both China and Russia, health risks, technological risks. In other words, they may bring back some kind of a pandemic real or imagined to lock us down with it. And so really what we're talking about is kind of a mega fourth turning because, you know, the fourth turning has been in the works for quite some time. And I think these people realized that cycle and you have a lot of them who referenced it. I mean, Steve Bannon used to reference it quite a bit. I thought that was kind of interesting. And I was hopeful at the very beginning of the Trump administration, somebody who was an advisor to president Trump was openly talking about this and that, well, maybe they'll do something about it.

Uh, they did, uh, they joined the other side, but, uh, you know, this is something that is, has been in the works for quite some time as a cycle, generational cycle of history, every four generations, there's massive economic disruptions. There's a questioning of institutions. People are looking at the institutions and saying, you know, they're really not working too well for us. Because usually by that time, after about 70 or 80 years, institutions will become corrupt. They have a life cycle. And so the corruption becomes really obvious to everybody. And that economic problem is usually accompanied by war.

But I think these people have noticed this trend, and I think they've done everything they can to double down and to weaponize it, essentially. The elites know that. They're wargaming. They have think tanks on them. You mentioned this yesterday in your interview this is going to be a massive fourth turning because now globally we've synced up you know there's been different turnings different civilizations and different continents but now with technology how close everything is in the globalization we've all synced up so to be a massive turning so i agree with you on that i think the elites you go back to and i mentioned this all the time but martin armstrong his Socrates program, it really caught my attention six or seven months ago when he was talking about how, look, the elites need war to save the currency.

It's the system of the dollar. And when you look at how history is trending, it's not looking good for the central banks in the United States and fiat currency in the West because we've dominated for so long with so little of the population of the earth. I mean, after World War II, as you know, we had 50% of the wealth in the West because we've dominated for so long with so little of the population of the earth. I mean, after World War II, as you know, we had 50% of the wealth in the world. We were 5% of the world's population. That still hasn't changed as far as our share of population, but our share of the wealth is rapidly depleted. And I mean, if you add up the periphery of the BRICS nations, which, you know, BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, now adding

probably Saudi Arabia and others. If you add the periphery nations, that's 90% of the earth's population. I mean, it's 40% just the main BRICS nations, but they're adding all the time. So this is a war on currency and the dollar has dominated, it's bullied, it's used sanctions, it's weaponized. Everything about the US dollar is weaponized. And so I think that it's going to have blowback. I mean, the CIA coined that term really well, I think. Your actions have consequences, and I think there's a global resetting. That's why I think it's important for people to look into assets.

I don't know about markets. I think a lot of people are stuck in the paradigm of this isn't our grandfather's or father's stock market anymore it's not about profit it's about uh esg it's it's it's about their eyes for the central bank so this is something i'm cautioning people about you're going to get caught flat-footed if you think if you have normalcy bias and even i do david i have normalcy bias and i admit that um but it's funny i bought a collection of coins a few months ago and in it was a coin from the Soviet Union from 1991. And I thought, wow, there wasn't a 1992 version of this. It was the last one. And I've seen in real time like we in the invasion of Iraq and how their currency went from being used one day to being zero the next. I've seen that in real time and people carrying out boxes from the bank,

trying to use them, raiding the banks, and there's no value. They only took U.S. dollars, and that's because, again, the dollar is the world's reserve currency, but how long will that last? Yeah, yeah. Well, that's what you see happening in other countries now, like Venezuela. It's taking essentially a month for them to earn at the regular wages, you know, what they need to eat. They can't afford to even feed themselves. And their currency is continuing to lose value.

So the only way these people are surviving for the most part is to leave the country or to have relatives who have left the country and moved to the U.S. to send them dollars. That's how the people are surviving there. But there isn't anything there that can sustain them. Going back to this piece from Rubini, he discounts the stock markets as well. What he said is really clear. You know, looking, discounting markets and, you know, the markets are rigged. And so you have to look at fundamental value. And as he's pointing out, you know, there's 200% to 350% inflation, or rather not inflation, 200 to 350% debt to GDP ratio globally.

And he said in the U.S., the debt to GDP ratio is higher than after the great depression and world war ii i mean think about that that's one of the most interesting we have a bigger debt uh than we did after the depression and what we spent with world war ii right now unprecedented you know we go back to the end of the 19th century and that old bankster jp morgan has a famous quote he says uh gold is money everything else is credit but that's, uh, gold is money. Everything else is credit, but that's not correct anymore. Gold is money. Silver is money.

Everything else is debt. It's not credit. It's debt. Cause again, they used to have a credit based fractional reserve banking system where you'd have an asset. You have so many assets, so many deposits. Now it's not about deposits at all.

It's about the creation of debt and how you can get away with it. And the central banks have been doing that. Why they have really don't have any other tools in their toolbox. not about deposits at all it's about the creation of debt and how you can get away with it and the central banks have been doing that why they have really don't have any other tools in their toolbox they like to sound fancy but really it's about currency creation yes yes that's right and because it is about debt that's really where rubini is hanging out i think it's one of the reasons why he could have seen you know when he saw uh what was going on with the real estate market, uh, earlier than the other people did. They call him Dr. Doom, uh, because of that. Uh, but, uh, he said the same thing you did about the markets. He said, uh, it's not just the stock market that is the least important of the markets. And so he talks about the credit markets, the bond markets, because that really is the measure

of this exploded debt bigger than the combined debt that we had rolled up during the Depression and World War II. That's where we are right now. How are they going to get out of this? Well, they're not. They're going to, in his viewpoint, they're going to go wobbly. They're going to turn away from it,

just like the British market did. It's kind of interesting to see what happened. When you look at what's going on, Tony, in the UK, that volatility there of kicking her out after only 44, 45 days, that was all about the markets. And that was all about what she was going to do in terms of taxes and that type of thing. So she was kicked out by the financial community. And they put their guy in, Rishi Sunak, who has been all about zeroing out the economy in the name of climate change and imposing central bank digital currency.

Pretty amazing. It really is. And I don't know if you've ever heard the old quote by Claire Booth Luce that says, the difference between a pessimist and an optimist is a pessimist has better information. I've always drifted towards that, David. But it's all about economics and

it's all about, you know, it's the economy, stupid, but it's the mega storm that, you know, it's funny, Jamie Demon, as you mentioned yesterday from JP Morgan, he's the first major bank. It's the biggest bank in the United States, David. And I talked about this when I hosted your show. Is nobody finding it odd that the head of the biggest bank in the u.s keeps talking about a massive economic superstorm when have banks not been cheerleaders for stability because it's all about deposit there's something up with that i don't know if he's playing a part or a role or something but yeah you see that they're they are bracing for impact and that's why i think it's such dangerous time for us but with these central bankers against the wall and and again

the the governments as well what would be the best cover for them and that would be a war you know even a new front war then again and so much can be solved with war when it comes to this because they can hide their failures and what they've done uh to humanity with the amount of uh currency and the fake economy that they've propped up so So I think we're in dangerous waters, but we've also got opportunity because for them to keep dominating, they have to keep the prices of precious metals extremely low. I mean, they're fighting day and night. I don't know how they're doing it,

but they're selling off contracts of bullion that doesn't exist, in my estimation, because we're looking on, and I was going to talk to you about this. There's an article up on Zero Hedge about dealers, bullion dealers, paying way over market for what they used to for physical silver. And I can see this in my own business because I can hardly get anything anymore. And every time I come on here, I tell you about the supply chain squeeze for silver and gold. Silver more than anything.

And I think there's just going to be a reckoning, David, where people are going to see that there's two different markets. There's the fake paper markets, and there's real. We're completely decoupled. As a matter of fact, I wanted to say, without disclosing too much, there's a David Knight listener that's going to sell me a little over 4,000 ounces of silver on Friday, and we're pre-selling that.

I haven't mentioned it anywhere else. So there's Canadian maple leaves, one ounce silver, and you can get them in real time. I'll have them on Friday. I think he's from your neck of the woods where you are now. He's going to drive it here to Branson.

So that's the kind of parallel economy that we're setting up with. And your wonderful audience and everybody that we know, we're working amongst ourselves to get supply and take care of each other and we can offer these things up because again these these markets are they're they're so different you go and look at slv and you're seeing silver on the spot price

and i don't even know what it is i think it's in the 19 range i'll check it real quick but and slv is is uh paper silver you know, they, they, they keep this stuff. I don't know what they keep it in Shanghai. They keep it on the commodities exchange or they keep it, the London, uh, metals, uh, thing. But, uh, you know, all of those are suspect and, and, you know, this, the one you were talking about, the article at zero hedge comics, deliverable silver is far less than imagined as 50% of what is listed as quote-unquote eligible is not available. And so they just went back and they looked at their books and said, well, you know, you've over-reported this silver on the commodity exchange. You've reported it twice as much as you've got. Right. People have been saying this about SLV and about GLD, these ETF paper metals coming out of the Shanghai Gold Exchange and things like that.

They've been saying, well, you know, nobody's auditing that stuff. And, you know, these are derivatives and they're just, it's kind of like what we saw with the derivative market with real estate. They're doing that with metals right now. But there is still real metal that is available. That's why it's really important for you to hold this stuff, I think. I think so too. And we talk about auditing the Fed. If you audited the actual precious metals market, there would be such an upending. That's why the BRICS nations want their own gold standard. They want their own commodity pricing mechanisms because we've been manipulating.

I'll say we, the West and the central banks. And there's a reckoning coming, I think. The supply chain is getting so weakened and the disparity between the paper markets and the real world. I mean, when I got into this business, David, it was, I'll give you 95% of spot for your silver. And that was paying high. That's what a, just a regular neighborhood, golden silver exchange. You could be 95% of spot for your silver. And we're paying like two, three, $4 over spot, especially for these Maple Leaf. I mean, and so again, it's because the supply is so it's so depleted and the demand is so high and no one's not and not a lot of people are selling right now.

And there isn't a lot of mining going on. So, I mean, if you look at the historical record too, it was always 10 to 1 to 16 to 1 was usually the ratio of the United States. That's what Alexander Hamilton set up for the gold-silver ratio in the United States. It was 16 ounces of silver made one ounce of gold. Now it 90. how did that happen that doesn't make any sense and that historically if you go back to the ancient egyptians at one time it was one to one uh but it's usually been 10 to 1 to around 16 to 1. that's throughout human history and for some reason i think it has a lot to do with central banking and the creation of fiat currency

in a modern era. I think it's just the commodities are all over the place, and I don't believe they're reflecting their own value. When we talk about the modern era, you spell that E-R-R-O-R. It's there for sure. It's interesting. You're talking about mining and all the rest of the stuff. When you stop and think about it, why do cryptocurrencies, why do Bitcoin, all of them talk about mining? Well, you know, because they're talking about how, hey, this is real. This is something that is just not going to be fiat. There's going to be work involved. There's going to be proof of work and all the rest of the stuff.

We're going to call that mining, you know, because they're trying to get trying to get this back into something that is real intangible. And that's the bottom line is, you know, that that's what makes the metals, um, have value is, is that reality that's there as opposed to, you know, the ETFs or the, uh, the rest of the Fiat stuff that they're putting out there. You know, there's a quote from Rubini, uh, at the end of this article, he says about gold, he says, uh, gold has not done very well because you have tight monetary policy and a strong dollar. But if central banks are going to blink and wimp out, gold is going to rise in value. And that's exactly what he thinks is going to happen. I mean, that's what his, uh, entire, his entire article interview, whatever it was,

it was talking about how he was certain that they were going to wimp out. And, his entire article interview, whatever it was, it was talking about how he was certain that they were going to wimp out. And, um, you know, that's, uh, as well as all the, the perfect storm of things that are, that are, um, coming together all at once. Yeah. These people aren't geniuses. Uh, it's like that old Hemingway quote, making fun of S. Scott Fitzgerald, you know, the rich are different. He said, yeah, they have more money and that's really it. I they have a printing press they're not geniuses you know they just um again have that power and that influence to to manipulate and that won't last forever i just i think you're you're you're betting on a dying system if you're

if you're buying into the dollar it's just it's not something that i think is wise well i do think we're reaching the point where um again just because it's not something that I think is wise. Well, I do think we're reaching the point where, um, again, just because it's been going on, they'd been running this game for so long. Uh, it's like the Looney Tunes character who runs off the cliff and he keeps going for a while until he looks down and realizes that there's nothing underneath him. And we're kind of at that moment right now. I agree. I think it's a volatile moment.

Uh, and I, I don't wish any of this because I know what the human consequences are going to be. I hope that I'm just wrong. But in case I'm not, right now I'm looking at creating more supply lines. We're working really hard on Wolfpack, and that's been getting more members. I think that's going to help us too with some of these type of buy-ins. And that's really a parallel economy that we're making right here. Talk a little bit about that because I've had some people write me and say, this is great.

They love Wolfpack where they can make small purchases. It's one of the reasons why you had the ETFs in the first place, right? They would set up these ETFs of gold and you could buy one-tenth of an ounce of gold. And so essentially what you're doing is you're letting people get in in small amounts, right? Yes, and we're going to open up something similar to that as well as soon as I capitalize a little bit more and have a bigger inventory where you can actually like we'll just maybe set up a fractional ownership of maybe I'll get a kilo bar of gold. You want to own this or an ounce of gold and you can fractionalize it and we can store it.

I'll have to work out some of the logistics of that. But right now, Wolfpack starts at $50 a month. It's a lone Wolf package. And that's going to be mostly silver unless you tell me, hey, Tony, I want gold. Then I'll have to wait two or three months before I send it because we have to let that accumulate because a small amount of gold is you know 70 80 bucks but Wolfpack is guaranteed delivery every month of you know if

you're 50 dollars worth of silver and we show we break it down on the invoice okay this is the credit card fee this is shipping and then we do a comparison of somewhere else and what's cool about Wolfpack is I'm doing these big buy-ins like this David Knight uh listener that's going to bring me silver I'm going to set aside about a thousand ounces of that silver. That's going to be for Wolfpack members. I was able to buy in lower than I would be if I bought it on a mint or an exchange. And I'm going to pass that on to Wolfpack members. So they just have to set it and forget it. And they're going to get a delivery every month and we break it down. This is what the cost of your items were. And this is a price comparison. We'll go to JM Bullion or AppMex and show you what you would have paid had you just gone there. And usually there's a significant savings. So we're, as for patients with everybody too, it flooded bigger than I thought it was going to do. And I was like, well, I'll get, you know, I'll try to get 20 or 30. Oh, well, man, I'm way past that. And I actually had to hire, I got a lady coming in every Friday now to help me pack some of

these boxes. And I'm not complaining. It's great. And this is what my vision was, was trying to create that parallel economy. And it's really a network too, because we're going to put together either a telegram chat or something like that where other Wolfpack members can talk and we can have deals in between the members as well. And so I'm just trying to create something that was a little different than just buy and buy and sell and go direct.

Oh, that's great. That's really exciting, especially the idea that people can communicate with each other and set up that kind of community. And of course, it's going to need to be on something like Telegram because I certainly don't. You got on Telegram. You mean you don't trust Elon Musk and Twitter? You don't think he's going to make it all better? No, I'm sorry. I don't trust Neuralink Musk with anything,

but I do like the chaos. One of my friends sent me a picture of him walking to Twitter headquarters. I'm like, I hope he fires everybody, and I hope it goes to MySpace levels. I'm fine with him going out of business as well. Oh, yeah. He walked in carrying that sink, and then he put up there. space levels yeah yeah i'm fine with them going out of business as well oh yeah yeah he walked in carrying that uh sink and uh then he put up there you know it's like i guess he's gonna

throw out the kitchen sink but he also put up there he says let that sink in you know going into the headquarters he'd already talked about how he's gonna get rid of 75 of them i think he'd just get rid of all of them uh they were they were complaining to him he goes well if you are productive you've got nothing to worry about and he knows that probably 75 of them, uh, they were, they were complaining to him. He goes, well, if you are productive, you've got nothing to worry about. And he knows that probably 75% of them at the very least are not productive at Twitter, uh, unless you're talking about censorship, but it's going to be interesting to see how that, um, how that continues to, um, to go. I'm still, you know, when it comes to social media, I need to get on telegram.

I'm not on telegram. And, uh, Telegram channel over there as well. That, uh uh one of your listeners has been running for you for a while yes uh so and i think he made me an admin so uh i'll see if i can help i i forget i forget i forget the socials david i don't do a good job i'm so i don't either but i have uh yeah but he's uh he's done a good job on that and he actually sent me some stuff uh to put out on twitter which i did uh repeat the some of the stuff on twitter

he put some he pulled together some clips for me i mean it's just the type of thing that i should He actually sent me some stuff to put out on Twitter, which I did, uh, repeat the, some of the stuff on Twitter. He put some, he pulled together some clips for me. I mean, it's just the type of thing that I should be doing. And we just, uh, don't have the time for you talking about having to get more people to fulfill orders. Uh, you know, Karen is running back and forth trying to fulfill orders and, uh, she's pretty much gotten caught up now. We got way behind because of the time that we were gone, but, um, uh, she's, she's getting caught up now

so um same thing here yeah same thing we did we didn't touch and i will leave you with this uh listeners should pay attention to the crypto markets there's a lot more crypto adoption right now and again i'm kind of neutral on on crypto a lot except for bitcoin i am somewhat still bullish on bitcoin i like the technology but i noticed that uh cash app put it put it the Lightning Network. And so there's a lot of back and forth with Bitcoin now, a lot more traffic and Bitcoin spiked a little bit. I covered on your show that there's been MasterCard picking up crypto adoption. So as we move forward to the central bank digital currencies, I even noticed that Israel is putting together a digital shekel or something like that. I mean, all the countries of the world and the central banks are putting together the digital currencies and leading back to the Bank of International Settlements.

That's going on. But again, parallel to that is the decentralized coins. And I still encourage people to learn how to use it, learn how to send a Bitcoin transaction. Cash apps. Have you had any issues with censorship on cash app david i haven't uh not that i know of i had some people say they tried to send me money but they weren't able to do it and um there is a uh we tried when we're moving our bank account i think it was an error that we made i don't think it was somebody trying to misdirect people um but um we

put up like a david knight one And actually I think there was a typo in it as well when I put the thing in and, uh, that's there and that's just kind of a dead letter thing. And I don't know if that's what people are having trouble thinking that that's the legitimate one, but it's just dollar sign David Knight. Um, I don't, maybe it's David Knight show. You'd have to take a look at what it has on the David Knight show.com. I've had a couple of people say they, they tried to send it and they weren't able to send it, but you know, I have, um, been getting some stuff through cash app. Uh, even, uh, people are able to send Bitcoin, uh, through cash app. And so I've had a few people send, you know, small amount of money, like $5 worth of Bitcoin

or something like that. Uh, and, um, so yeah, cash app is, um, is um uh you know one of the things that we take um venmo is uh also there i like venmo if your bank supports it because it doesn't have any fees at all uh but uh you know again that's dependent on whether or not your your bank supports that so uh there are different things out there but i think uh a lot of those things are are going to get iffy when we look at mastercard and how they're going to try to push people and say, yeah, we're going to be part of the crypto thing. MasterCard is also working very, very hard on coming up with a global ID and a global biometric ID. So all of this stuff, I look at what MasterCard is doing. I look at what a lot of these other places are doing as they're saying,

oh yeah, you know, we're going to support crypto and all this stuff. When I look at the internet and, um, how it was so free for about 10 or 15 years. Uh, I, I look at the same type of thing happening with the crypto stuff. They're trying to make it open and available to get people to come in. And then they're going to shut the doors and turn on the gas. I mean, you know, that's really what happened with the internet. It was kind of a rope-a-dope type of thing and lets you have a taste of freedom. So everybody comes in and gets used to using the social media platforms and then the controls come on. And now everybody's forgotten that they can actually go to a website.

You know, they can actually go to your website at wisewolf.gold or davidknight.gold or whatever. They can actually go to thedavidknightshow.com. If they don't see it on social media, it doesn't exist anymore. They've changed the people's mindset. So they look for everything on Facebook or on Twitter or some of these controlled walled gardens, as Matt Drudge used to call it in the days when he was opposing the system instead of joining it he used to call these social media places walled gardens and and that's what I think it really is designed to be so I kind of worry about MasterCard and a lot of these other people

that they're just kind of laying a trap for people I don't disagree with you there my main focus there is just seeing more adoption because I think the bigger the space grows, they may not be able to control it. Again, that's, I try to be as optimistic as possible because there's not much to be optimistic about in the short term. So I'm looking at anything that, you know, if it grows the space or it creates some more entrepreneurs to get into decentralized coins, I think that's fantastic. We need all we can get away from these central bank digital currencies and away from the fiat system, which is driving our current nightmare. Well, even if we look at the Internet and all the controls that they put on, we still have ways that we can get some information out there.

We still have Telegram. We still have podcasts and other things like that. And it's going to be a constant, um, struggle of control and of countermeasures and that type of thing. Uh, that's just going to be the price of Liberty. Uh, but, um, yeah, I agree with you. I think, uh, people need to learn how it works and, um, you know, educate themselves, uh, so they can do the, the real crypto stuff and not the central bank digital currencies. I agree. 100%. Well, Tony, it's great talking to you as usual. And thank you so much for providing those services,

the Wolfpack stuff and the David Knight dot gold. You're doing a great job there and it is a much needed service. People need to be looking for ways to, to have a parallel society and key to all of that is going to be the financial stuff. Coming up, I'm going to be talking about Rishi Sunak and how this guy is really kind of a Davos point man in the same way that Ruta was a point man for the food control. Rishi Sunak is really a point man for the coming financial controls, I think.

So we're going to revisit that a bit more as well. So thank you so much, Tony, for coming on. Thank you for supporting the program here and for helping us out over the last couple of weeks. You did a great job. Thank you. Thank you, David. All right, we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back. Stay with us. As your news been censored, banned, censored, banned over and over again?

Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media? It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to thedavidknightshow.com. There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links. Live stream the show at D live and every Monday through Friday, 9am Eastern videos at bitch shoot and huge to new audio podcast, the real David Knight show at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart, Spotify, and more. But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel, without your support, the show will run out of gas. The links to support the show are at thedavidknightshow.com to donate via Subscribestar, donate via or donate via Cash App, Bitcoin or P.O. Box.

Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this far. Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family. History is truly at a turning point. It's the beginning of a global mobilization effort to rally

our forces behind this great reset initiative. Energy systems, food systems and supply chains will be deeply affected. We will destroy, unfortunately, a lot of employment. The future is already here. It's coming like a tsunami. Just think of sensors planted into our brains. The opportunities are immense. And we have to prepare ourselves already now. The most important thing to know about the future

is that humans will soon be hackable animals. Elites may gain the power to re-engineer the future of life itself. Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design. Not the intelligent design of some god above the clouds, but our intelligent design. Freedom is the right to say no. Thank you. All right, and that was a great clip by Chase Cookson. The right to say no, that is what liberty is. But we have to understand that liberty is not the primary thing. We must pursue God,

understanding that liberty is a gift from God. And my hope, and I get energized not by hearing people talk about liberty, but I get energized by watching Yuval Harari talk about God. When he mocks God, we should understand that this is now God who's going to take him on. So go ahead, Yuval. You talk about your Noah's Ark and you talk about how you're going to re-engineer humanity and how we're all just putty in your hands and you mock and laugh at God. Why do the nations rage and people imagine a vain thing? Well, because that's what they do when they are in rebellion to God. So we understand we don't want to make an idol out of liberty.

We don't want to worship liberty. The founders of this country didn't do that. Founders of this country recognized that liberty was a gift from God. And so we keep things in the proper order. But we're now being told in the UK as so many people are pushing back against Rishi Sunak and calling him a globalist, which he certainly is. There's absolutely no doubt about what this guy is about. There's no doubt about what all the leadership of the Conservative Party in the UK is about. It is a globalist coup, as Nigel Farage said. Now, if they can't stop you from pointing out the truth, they'll try to portray you as dangerous, as racist, and that type of thing. And so that's exactly the strategy that they're doing now.

They're saying that the term globalist is an anti-Semitic slur. Did you know that Rishi Sunak is Jewish? No, actually he's not. He's Indian. So they're not saying that this is a racist slur against people of color. No, they're saying preposterously that it is an anti-Semitic slur. Just start to rattle out some of the globalists that we're talking about here. Rishi Sunak? Klaus Schwab?

Is he Jewish? No. How about Bill Gates? How about Emmanuel Macron? How about Justin Castro? Trudeau? How about him? How about Mark, not Pierre, but Justin Castro, Trudeau? How about him? How about Mark Ruta? None of those guys, none of those guys are Jewish.

It is not a slur. A debate has emerged in Britain over the term globalist. And this is an article from Breitbart. With elements of the legacy media and social media arguing that using the word to describe the political ideology of preferring super states over individual sovereign states is actually a racist term against Jewish people. Seriously, that's what they're talking about.

Following what many, such as Brexit leader Nigel Farage, have described as a globalist coup to install Goldman Sachs banker and World Economic Forum acolyte Rishi Sunak as prime minister, left-wing figures have attempted to make the very term globalist off-limits. Because it's too accurate. You see, they will come up with some other term that is positive for them. Terms for you that are pejoratives. And if you've got an accurate term to describe them, then they'll say, well, that's racist or it's hateful and you're not allowed to use that term. That's off limits.

Jeremy Hunt said Nigel Farage on Twitter, Jeremy Hunt is now running the country. This is a globalist coup. Well, Jeremy Hunt is not Jewish either, but they say, well, there is, um, uh, he, he has installed Grant Shapps as home secretary. And see, Grant Shapps is Jewish. You look at all these other people, none of them are Jewish. There is one Jewish person. So if you use the term globalist, that is anti-Semitism. And of course, it's not just the leftists in the establishment and the EU people, the globalists in Europe and the UK who are saying this, but it's also the Anti-Defamation League.

Anti-Semitism experts such as the Anti-Defamation League identify globalists as a common anti-Semitic trope based on conspiracy theories about international Jewish power. This is a comment from the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. What a joke. What a joke. As a matter of fact, it was the ADL who took me to task. It was reported by the Daily Beast and others back in late April, not late April, late March. They were writing articles about how I was a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist because I was talking about how this is medical martial law. And implied that it was anti-Semitic to talk about globalism at the time,

and that was coming from the ADL. The ADL was also advising, I subsequently learned, PayPal. Maybe that's why I was kicked off a PayPal memo so early. It is not anti-Semitism to talk about this. The linguistic dispute came to a head on Sunday when a caller to the LBC radio station, and this is really, you know, LBC is radio station, which I haven't watched their content, but you know, it's, it's not the BBC. Uh, this is, um, this is a network that Farage had a show on at one point in time. I don't know if they've drifted left or whatever,

but I mean, they were certainly not as leftward an establishment as BBC. And I don't think they are yet, but there is a person who used to work for the BBC now doing a show there. The person's name is Shagita Miska, formerly of the BBC. A caller echoed what Nigel Farage said, described Sunak as a globalist who doesn't seem to love England.

And so this LBC host, Mishka, again, used to be with the BBC, chastised the caller and said, quote, as we continue this conversation, please don't use the phrase globalist again. It's not a phrase, it's a single word. But anyway, please do not use the phrase globalist again, because many of my Jewish listeners will find that incredibly offensive because it has been used at times as a racist put down to the Jewish community.

And the caller shot back and he said, that's not true. He says, if I meant Jewish, I would say Jewish. But again, you use this, you know, you scream, you play the race card to try to censor people and to shut down their speech when you can't think of anything else. Globalist is a very accurate term. As a matter of fact, if you, according to the Oxford English Dictionary's definition of globalism, which was shared by Nigel Farage, he says, oh, you want to say that it's anti-Semitic?

He said, well, this is what the Oxford Dictionary defines globalism as, quote, the belief that events in one country affect those in all other countries and that economic and foreign policy should benefit the world as a whole instead of individual countries. And they want to have a centralized government. But when you look at the Oxford Dictionary, this is all about political organization and structure. It shares a lot of things with Marxism, but it doesn't share national socialist Nazi ideology. As a matter of fact, the Nazis were hyper-nationalist. They weren't globalist. They wanted to take over the globe, but they were all about their nationality.

Whereas if you look at what the Marxists were talking about, the communists, the ones who they both called themselves socialists. You know, the Russians, Stalin called himself a socialist. Hitler called himself a socialist. But one of the key differences between them was the nationalist versus the international orientation. And of course, the anthem for the Russian government, they called it the Internationale. Anyway, Anglican deacon and a news host on GB News, Calvin Robinson, also took aim at it. He said, quote, be wary of anyone who hears globalists and thinks the Jews. In other words, those people who hear globalists and think the Jews, they are the ones who are anti-Semitic.

He said, as ever, they are the very thing they accuse us of. A globalist is a politician who operates from an international perspective, rather from the local and national perspective. I think that's very important. As a matter of fact, I had a listener who, and I forget the context where it came up. I was talking about the license plate situation in Israel. And I said yesterday that 50 years ago when we were in college, we had a friend who had, and I, because it's 50 years ago and we've lost contact with pretty much all of our friends in college, Karen keeps up with a few of them on Facebook, but not many.

But she had spent some time living in Israel and talking about it because we were asking her what it was like and things like that. And she had said that somebody was a Christian in the car. So how'd you know they were Christian? Because this is before people started putting things like Christian fish or something like that on their car. So I thought that was odd.

And I asked her about it. And she said, well, there's different tags for Christians and for Muslims and for Jews and things like that. But really? And I really questioned her on that, and that was, you know, she firmly believed. Now, she could be wrong. I had a listener who contacted me and said, that's not the case, certainly not the case today anyway. I don't know if that was the case 50 years ago.

She might have been mistaken. I might have been mistaken. But I did question her quite a bit on that. But the listener said, no, it's not set up as a theocracy, that there's license plates that are different for different political jurisdictions, and because different political jurisdictions are predominantly one ethnic group or religious group or the other, that you can make that kind of inference. Perhaps that was what she was talking about.

I don't know. But anyway, getting back to this, here's another globalist, Boris Johnson. Boris Johnson. Not Jewish either. Boris Johnson is going to be coming to the United States to lobby for Ukraine. He doesn't believe that we're firmly enough involved in this war, so he wants to get us more involved. Boris Johnson, after working against the interests of his own country, the United Kingdom, working

for the interests of the globalists, now he's going to come to America and he's going to work against the interests of the American people and in the interest of the globalists. There's a lot of money to be had as a lobbyist. Maybe that's what he's going to do. He gets a stipend as a former prime minister. As I pointed out the other day, Liz Truss, who only put in 45 days or so, is now going to collect 129,000, I don't know if it's pounds or dollars, a year for the rest of her life.

So maybe he's looking at some way to supplement that income because it may not be enough for his lavish lifestyle. Speaking of income, thank you, Jacqueline Hogan. Thank you very much for the tip. And Andromeda, thank you very much for the tip as well. He says, thank you for being an honest voice of reason. Well, the only thing we have is to try to find the truth. If we get off, like I just said about the story about Israel,

I don't know if that was, I want to give you full disclosure. That's what somebody said. It's certainly not the situation today. I may have been wrong about it 50 years ago, but we have to try to focus on the truth regardless of where it leads us. Anyway, the former Prime Minister Boris Johnson says he's going to now spend more time in Washington, D.C. to lobby for continued bipartisan U.S. support for Ukraine. So maybe, you know, he's just going to be doing this out of the kindness of his heart.

There's so much money floating around and so much money that's just disappeared that we send to Ukraine. I mean, whether you're talking about massive, the tens of billions of dollars worth of arms, or you're talking about the tens of billions of dollars worth of financial aid, it's all disappearing somehow. Not all of it, but a large part of it is. Going back to 2014, one person who's been involved in bringing weapons to Ukraine said, well, you know, since 2014, we can only account for about 30% of this stuff. So where did the other two thirds go? Yeah. Where did it go?

I don't know. When we look at what the, what the globalists want to do again, everything comes back down to surveillance and control. Control of where you go, what you do, what you buy, and they want to know everything about it. So we have Tesco stores, which I heard of them, you know, when we were in the UK, they're everywhere, Tesco is. To my knowledge, I don't think there's any of them in the United States, certainly not any places that I've lived, but it turns out it is the largest grocery store chain in the world, as Klaus Schwab would say,

the leading UK and the leading global retail chain, Tesco. And they're about to get sued if, well, there's a threat that they're going to get sued because they're now demanding that customers download an app in order to enter their checkout free stores. So they're setting up these stores similar to what Amazon is doing in America. The idea being that it's going to follow you around the store and you just accumulate stuff and it'll be watching you and it'll know what you have with you. And, uh, you don't have to go through a formal checkout thing. You just grab stuff off the shelf and,

you know, walk out as if you were in San Francisco or LA or something, except that unlike San Francisco and LA, uh, they will actually make you pay for it eventually. And there is no cost for doing that in LA and San Francisco, thanks to the Soros DAs. But corporations are increasingly doing this. That is their goal, to have checkout-free shopping, and so they have to have some way to identify you. So first they put up the requirement that you have to download the app

and you have to put it on your phone. See, phones are going to be mandatory for everybody if you want to do anything go anywhere uh you're going to have to have a phone that's going to be big brother it's going to identify you as i've said many times the nfsa was laughing about this a decade or more ago saying, you know, they had the three slides and I've shown those to you. They were part of the Snowden leaks. They were publicized not in the U.S., but they were publicized only by Der Spiegel in Germany. And it was three slides. The first one shows the 1984 Super Bowl commercial about the Mac. And they said, who would have thought in 1984,

cause that was when the Mac came out and the next one shows Steve jobs holding up a phone and it says, who would have thought in 1984, that this, the phone would become big brother. And the third slide shows people all queued up at the Apple store and that people would line up to pay for it themselves. And that's going to be required. You're going to have to have that smartphone, that surveillance, that big brother thing in order to do anything in order to even go shopping. Because the big chains are going to require that.

Uh, so again, that means that, um, you know, if you've got some silver and you want to go down to the local grocery store and pay cash for it with silver, uh, that's going to be in the future. How are you going to go down to the local grocery store and pay cash for it with silver, that's going to be in the future how you're going to escape this situation. Anyway, so what is happening with this? This includes the use of QR codes, smart shopping carts, RFID tags, and machine vision. Back in Texas, the big grocery store chain there in the austin area was heb there was an article about a month ago talking about how they were doing experimental checkout areas so this is not store-wide but you could take your grocery cart that was full and you would put it on this platform and it would weigh it it would look it, do all these different types of things, scanning it, all the rest of the stuff.

And come with a grand total and do that for you. So they were doing it that way. But there was a warning letter that was sent by the Irish Council for Civil Liberties. It was sent to Tesco's CEO warning that it will take legal action. If the retailer decides to spread the use of these tools into the European economic area, Tesco's first checkout free store in central London, they call it get go is what inspired the Irish group to pay attention.

In addition to having an app in order to pay and to get receipts, customers also have to become members of a club card. And so there is a three-part tweet, a thread, from one person, Jonathan Rosen, and he got quite a bit of response from it. He got several thousand retweets. He said, It just had a distressing experience at Tesco just now.

10.50 p.m. near Chancery Lane Tube, after a work event, I receive a text to get a sandwich for my son's packed lunch tomorrow. So I see a store. I think, I'm in luck. But I can only enter the store if I download the app and sign up to the club card. Pragmatism had me download the app, but I said no to the club

card. I can't proceed to buy the sandwich and get home. There is a barrier. So I asked for help and the staff member takes my phone and changes the option on the app to, quote, accept the club card. I say, no thanks. And then he says to me, well, then you can't get in. I say, I just want to buy a sandwich, and nowhere else is open right now. He says, sorry, but this is store policy now, and it's what customers want. Soon, he says, all stores will be like this. People protest, but then they come back a few days later, he said.

Yeah, we know how this works. You're not going to be happy about this, but it's what customers want. Well, if it's what customers want, then why are people protesting it? It's like, no, we're big. We're going to force you to do what we want on the terms that we want. And of course, we're going to share that information with the government as well. You know, it's just harmless information, right? There's not anything that they would or could do with that information, is there? Well, what does Michael Hayden, the former head of the NSA and the CIA, say about metadata?

Again, metadata. This is not reading your actual texts and making inferences about that. It's not reading your emails. It's not listening to your phone conversations and making transcriptions or any of that kind of stuff. No, metadata is the kind of stuff that they're all capturing. Well, he went here. He went there. This is the speed at which he was traveling, that type of stuff. No, metadata is the kind of stuff that they're all capturing. Well, he went here, he went there. This is the speed at which he was traveling, that type of stuff. You know, the kind of things that they use to show what traffic congestion is on the map apps and that type of thing. All of that, that's metadata.

It's anonymized, right? There's nothing to see here, is there? Well, here's what Michael Hayden, NSA CIA said. First of all david's description of what you can do with metadata he's not talking about mutual friend stewart baker is absolutely correct okay we kill people based on metadata but that's not what we do with this metadata yeah you can trust us with this stuff. We kill people. Every time I look at Michael Hayden, see if you can pull up a picture from Brazil of the baby mask.

I'm talking about when he had Michael Palin, who was playing the role of Inquisitor, even to his previous friend. When he would do it, he would put on a white coat. And then he put on this baby mask and a torture him there you go and whenever I look at that yeah I get the one that's up there on the upper right there you can say yeah there you go all right there yeah that's what it looks like when he's doing the interrogation and the torture that's that's what Michael Hayden always looks like to me I would just show you you again. Take a look. Good look at that. And then here is Michael Hayden again talking about MetaKill.

First of all, David's description of what you can do with metadata and quoting a mutual friend, Stuart Baker, is absolutely correct. We kill people based on metadata. He pauses there for effect. Be impressed. Aren't you impressed? I mean, here's this pudgy little guy that looks like a baby, and yet he can kill people. He is so powerful, brags Michael Hayden, that he can kill people using metadata. How about that?

But don't worry. I'm not going to do that to you today. Not today. Well, geospatial intelligence is the fastest growing part Don't worry. I'm not going to do that to you today. Not today. Not today. Well, geospatial intelligence is the fastest growing part of the intelligence community, has been since the late 1990s. Geospatial intelligence is about mapping everything that you do so that they can predict everything that you're going to do. It's about identifying you and mapping the political and religious beliefs of communities

and all that type of thing. That's what geospatial intelligence is. And it uses metadata. And so, you know, people don't like this. People protest it, but it's really what the people want, isn't it? So in exchange for some benefits, customers will hand over their retailer, their personal data, their metadata, and even more so. And apparently a large amount of such data as well. That says the Irish Commission that is talking about this, the ICCL, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties. So that council says that violates data minimization rules, a principle that is present in both the EU's personal data protection rules and in those in the UK's devised post-Brexit. You know, I kind of find it interesting.

They have more of an awareness of rules to protect privacy at least that's how they virtue signal about it whether they do it or not and I don't think that they do do it I mean you know they create these things in the same way that you know there's all this fine language and the constitutions of communist China and communist Russia and all the rest of the stuff about respecting your rights, but it's just a piece of paper. They don't care about it any more than our rulers care about the piece of paper we call the constitution. But they will put that stuff in there, and they will create organizations

that are supposed to protect our privacy, whether they work or not. They do that because there is demand from the European people to protect their privacy. We don't do that in the United States because there is no demand from the American people to protect our privacy. It's like, yeah, go for it. Go for it. Even when we got people like Michael Hayden saying the types of things that he's saying, we say, yeah, yeah, forget about privacy.

So data minimization refers to limiting the collection of personal information only to that which is directly relevant and necessary for a specific purpose. So, yeah, corporations are abusing this. They're giving it to the government as well. And, you know, quite frankly, as I've said before about the ability to limit our free speech, I think, you know, in what has become de facto public squares, I think that the government needs to recognize that it's given corporations privileges. They have privilege licenses, they even call it. They have to pay the government for the purpose of operating. Whether you agree with that or not, that is the current situation.

It used to always irk me when we had a small mom and pop business. I said, look at this. They tell everybody that welfare is a right, but operating a business and earning money is a privilege. And that's really their orientation. So if that is their orientation, I don't think it should privilege. And that's really their orientation. So if that is their orientation, I don't think it should be, but if that is their orientation, at the very least, even though I don't support privilege license, it's just another justification that attacks people. But if they're going to talk about it being a privilege, and it is, and it's an institution

that is created by government, it's not a human being who's created by God, there should be some responsibilities from them, some things that they're not allowed to do. They're not allowed to purge us out of the public square. They're not allowed to become deputized surveillance agents for the government either. And I think that is just basic common sense. For example, if you allow this to continue, then you have situations like Justin Castro Trudeau, who says, matter of factly, Canadians can no longer buy or sell handguns. That's a globalist. He's a globalist, right? He's not Jewish. He's a globalist, though. People can no longer buy, sell, or transfer handguns within Canada,

and they cannot bring newly acquired handguns into the country, tweeted Trudeau. Why? Well, because he says so. Well, what difference does that make? Don't they have a rule of law? No, they have a dictator now. Dictator Trudeau, just like his real daddy, Castro. So what is dictator Trudeau going to dictate next?

He said, Canadians have the right to feel safe in their homes, in their schools, in places of worship, and so forth. They just don't, they have a right to feel safe. They just don't have a right to be safe. Big difference. The handgun freeze follows Canada's earlier measures to ban more than 1,500 types of assault-style firearms. So they start out and they say, we're going to get assault rifles, whatever that means to me. We're going to stop those things.

And then before you know it, he comes after all the handguns as well. This is what happens when these people are allowed to operate as dictators. We should not be viewing the elections as electing a different dictator every four or five years. It's like a communist plan. They have their five-year central planned economies, plans, and we've got our four-year elections. Dictators either way. MarkM228, thank you very much for the tip. He says, let's make it triple digits on Rockfin.

Thank you very much, and you did. I appreciate that. Appreciate that very much. Victor Orban, we're talking about dictators. He says, you know, these EU bigwigs will end up falling just like the Soviet dictators did. Why? Because they are dictators. That's what always happens to dictators.

Jonathan Matheson, thank you very much. He said, David, while there's a lot of people in positions of power in the world that are not Jews, they still serve Jewish interests in Israel. There's a term that the Jews have for it, Shaboy's Goy. There's also conversos, Trump who converted Judaism in 2017. Biden has a personal rabbi. The Jews are always bragging in Jewish news sources about their control over everything in the world.

Well, I think that it's fundamentally Satan that is behind this. I think it is much bigger than any particular ethnic group. And I think we do a disservice if we over generalize and we accuse people who are not involved in this of being involved in it and so I think that we have to be accurate in terms of what we talk about I think we paint it all with a big broad brush you know if we add sensational things that are not true that we can't support as being 100 true and that that is not 100 true uh if we're going to just say well it's uh

you know the globalism is being run completely by jews i don't think that's true and um and what that does is when we add false details to it that destroys what we're trying to do to warn people about what's really going on. We need to stay focused on the people who are doing this. And quite frankly, I don't think the Gates is ultimately the guy behind all of this stuff. I think it's much higher than that. I think one of the reasons you see this happening

over multiple generations is because it's fundamentally satanic. It's fundamentally dark, satanic, supernatural forces. We don't wrestle against flesh and blood. We wrestle against principalities and powers that are supernatural, that are above the natural. And we're not going to win this fight if we continue to focus on trying to pit one group of people against another group of people.

We need to hold individuals responsible for what they're doing. And I understand that there are cabals and there are organizations like the UN, like Davos, other things like that, and they are working together against things. But just look at what is happening in Israel. I've mentioned many times how the Israeli government, both sides of the Israeli, it doesn't matter which political party, just like every other country, you know, whether you're talking about Benjamin Netanyahu or you're talking about his liberal opponent, I don't even know who that is at this point in time.

Both of them put the Israeli people on the altar to be sacrificed to Pfizer. The political leaders realized, because they were in on this globalist plan, they realized that the vaccine was going to be used to isolate countries, the same thing that they were doing to twist arms in Argentina and in Brazil, saying, you're going to indemnify us against any injury that we do, not just against the vaccines being experimental, but if we injure anybody because of, um, uh, reckless negligence or whatever, right. You're going to indemnify us against that. And, um, and why were they holding that over their head? Well, because it was very well known.

And even if people were not part of a conspiracy that you could put two and two together, and you knew that it was going to be required to travel into or out of a country. And if the country couldn't get the vaccines as people were going to be locked down. And so the Israeli leaders of both parties were willing to sacrifice their people to Pfizer and said, we'll give you all the information. You know, we'll keep the data for a couple of years and we'll give you the information. That's what they should have been doing before they ever released this stuff. They should have had years worth of information. But they basically turned the Israeli people into lab rats for Pfizer.

So you have people in Israel that are being abused by these Israeli political leaders. I don't see any point of trying to hold up any political party or any political nation as a standard or as the only source of all this stuff, because I think that it's going to, we have to understand that they've all betrayed us in every single one of these countries. Jacqueline Hogan, thank you very much for the tip. There was never a clot shot mandate for welfare recipients. Only for us working slobs. That's right. They never said

they did and I think they might have in some countries made the receiving of social services incumbent on that. mean i'm not sure of that i know they do that for the odd heart system the id the biometric id system in india you're not going to get the you know they made people they got enough poor people there uh that the people need to have uh that you know government handout for all kinds of things you know they

depend on them for welfare and on health care to survive and things like that. So they said, well, you're not going to get that unless you get the ID. And that's what they want to do to us. That's why they're in the process of removing our financial independence. And a big part of that is to remove our job and our earning ability. To remove that, make us dependent on them, they've got us. And so you're right. They did focus certainly on the jobs. Going back to the reckoning though, and the mindset that I think we need to have, here's Viktor Orban.

And he made some comments at the 66th anniversary of the Hungarian uprising against the Soviet Union in 1956. At the speech, he said that, yeah, it turned into a military defeat, but he emphasized that even in defeat, his nation often remains victorious, ultimately. Our perspective needs to be not one that is absolutely crushed. We need to not be crushed in spirit when we lose a battle. You've got to keep sight of the idea that this is a long-term war.

And so that's what he was telling the people. He said, look, we're in a battle right now with the European Union. They're trying to harm this country, but they're a bunch of dictators. And we've been oppressed and enslaved by dictators in the past, and ultimately, we want our freedom. And that's an important message

for all of us to remember. He said, the lesson of 1956 is clear. Whoever wants to put a knee on our neck is doomed to fail. Let's not bother with those who shoot at Hungary from the shadows or shoot at Hungary from the heights of Brussels where the EU is headquartered.

They will end up where their predecessors did. He's absolutely right, and that should be our attitude toward this. When we look at what is happening, even NPR is trying to make excuses for Biden and trying to explain away what's going on with the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, what is going on with the takedown of fuel and energy deliberately. But with the election only about 10 or 11 days away, we've got about 25 days left of diesel fuel in the southeast. And so this is Maryland, Virginia, North and South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama. Diesel supplies are very scarce across the northeast and now in the southeast.

Supplies are at the lowest seasonal level for this time of year. The U.S. has only 25 days left of the industrial fuel in storage. But that's okay because we got enough to get Biden through the election, right? Until everybody realizes what's going on. They said the East Coast diesel fuel prices are 30 to 80 cents higher than the posted market average because supply is so tight. At times, carriers are having to visit multiple terminals to find supply, which delays deliveries

and strains local trucking capacity. He said the latest EIA data shows that there's only 25 days of diesel supply, the lowest since 2008. They said diesel markets have been in crisis for much of 2022. It's underinvestment in the nation's fuel making capacity. It's because of refinery closures and disruptions,

strong domestic demand, soaring exports for the fuel and the Russian energy embargo. Now, how much of that is Biden? Well, let's see. Closing of refineries. People are not building any more refineries, and they're closing some of the ones they have rather than fixing them up because Biden has said,

you're not going to have that business in the future. We're going to take it away from you. So that's Biden. What about disruptions? Well, that's Biden as well, especially with the embargo and the sanctions on energy. And so most of that is not the marketplace. That's Biden.

In France, as people are staring down the coming winter and wondering how they're going to even heat their homes, you have in France, which is positioned into nuclear power and an alternative better than most of the other countries, they have 56 different nuclear reactors, but 26 of them are offline for maintenance or for corrosion repair. And then in addition to that, they have labor unrest, strikes that are threatening or in some cases have already delayed work there.

And so half of their capacity, power capacity, in France is being threatened. Rishi Sunak, the guy who was all about net zero, zeroing out the economy in the name of the climate MacGuffin, is now banned fracking again. It's one of the things that Liz trusted when she came in, uh, she won over him in the first round because he was associated with the highest taxes that they'd had in 70 years. And, uh, so the first thing she did was to start to cut some taxes

and, um, she restarted fr fracking and the globalists who were in charge of the conservative party and the rest of the uk came back after that very quickly and so rishi sunak has now reimposed the ban on fracking that was lifted by liz truss he hinted that he would also listen to this he's also going to bring back the effective ban on onshore wind farms. And you've got offshore wind farms, they put them out in the water.

But these are onshore wind farms. And they're talking about banning them. He said, they don't want you to have any kind of power. They don't want you to have even wind power. They say, well, you can't have any of the so-called fossil fuels. We'll do windmills and solar panels. Sorry, can't do the windmills now. This is what they've been doing. It is all a dodge. You know, they'll come out and say, well, you know, we want to lower emissions. Okay, well,

let's have some hybrid cars. Well, no, now we're not going to allow hybrid cars either. It's got to be electric cars. Okay, fine. We can create electric cars a number of different ways. We can do fuel cells. We can do other things like that. No, no, no. It's going to have to be a battery that's going to be charged off of the grid. And we're not going to allow you to put any power into the grid either. So the bottom line is it's all about taking us to zero. Just listen to a little bit of what, I'm not going to play the full speech because it's about five or six minutes long, but here's a little bit about what Rishi said a year ago at the climate summit. You know, they have COP26. This is what he said last year. this is probably one of the reasons why they handpicked this guy

to be put into the prime minister position this is the first cop to bring together so many of the world's finance ministers businesses and investors with such a clear common purpose to deliver the promise made in par Paris six years ago to direct the world's wealth to protect our planet. The good news is that the will is there. At least 80% of the global economy has committed to net zero or carbon neutrality targets. Our challenge now is to deploy the investment we need to deliver those targets around the world. To do so, we are accelerating three actions today. First, we need increased public investment.

And I want to speak directly to the developing countries of the world. We know that you've been devastated by the double tragedies of coronavirus and climate change. That's why the G20 is stepping up to provide debt treatments more swiftly. It's why the IMF are providing a new $650 billion allocation of special drawing rights, and Kristalina will say more on this later. and it's why we're going to meet the target to provide a hundred billion dollars of climate finance to developing countries and while we know we are not yet meeting it soon enough we will work closely with developing countries to do more and to reach the target sooner you know it's kind of interesting how once you see one of these guys step up like Mark

Ruda in the Netherlands, once he steps up and starts talking about how we're going to shut down all the farms or anything, you can go back a year or two, go back five years or whatever. You can see this guy has been speaking to the UN, speaking to Davos about doing just that, that they were the point person for doing that. And somehow, somehow, they get installed as prime minister. Same thing is happening here as well. They're about to do their annual COP.

COP 27 is coming up. And we're going to have some people that are going to be covering that live hopefully and get mark morano um and i know that alex newman from the new american is going to be there live so we're going to try to get them to join us once they're on site their harps thank you very much he says uh good day david and family i really enjoyed the second amendment lawyer interviewed uh hope you get him on again as a USA Supreme Court case precedent can be used here in Australia. Well, I will have him on again. I did enjoy talking to him and he that is a specialty.

So we'll get him get him back on. And I wonder, I'm curious if that is something that they say that they use it as a precedent, you know, because here in the U.S., the Supreme Court has referred, when it comes to things like Roe v. Wade, it began, the decision began by them saying, well, you know, there's all kinds of interesting opinions about when life begins. We have religious and philosophical opinions. We have scientific data. We have laws from other

countries and all the rest of the stuff and they said but we are bound to make this decision based on what the constitution says and what the constitution says alone and that was the last time they referred to the constitution the rest of the decision was about all the different things that they just mentioned, you know, political, philosophical, religious, the scientific positions of the day, and foreign law. That was all referenced, but not the Constitution, in Roe v. Wade. So I'm wondering if that is something that they have gone rogue on, or if that's really a real thing in Australia. So, yeah, it's the same types of arguments that are always used, though, to take away freedom.

That is the common thing. We're talking about what is happening with energy, talking about what is happening with Rishi Sunak and his plan to price gasoline and diesel. That's a big part of what he's already proposing. It's what he did with his massive tax increases as well. Already added massive taxes to those to make them go away. NPR had a piece talking about Biden. Listen to this headline.

See if you think this is true. Whether gas prices are up or down, don't blame or thank the president. See, Biden has nothing to do with this. And they show a picture of a gas pump with a sticker that everybody's been putting on it where Biden is pointing and he says, I did that, you know, pointing to the price tag. It's not his problem at all. He has nothing to do with it. It's all out of his control. That's what Biden has been saying. Yeah, it's not me. It's OPEC. It's the oil companies. It's the gas stations. It's everybody but me. I have nothing to do with this. To which I will say, well, if you're that helpless, what are you doing there? I would always say that about, you know, the apologists for Trump during the pandemic would say the same thing about Trump that these people are saying about Biden.

I said, well, that's pretty pathetic if he's not doing anything about it. He knows it's happening. He can do something about it. He could do something about the censorship. All he has to do is just use his bully pulpit. He could have gotten off of Twitter and gone to Gab or something like that, but he chose not to. And so Biden has chosen not to. As a matter of fact, Biden has talked a great deal about how this is going to be a painful

transition, but it's great. Saying the same thing that Trudeau is saying. Yeah, this is going to be good. We can really use this. This is going to put the nail in the coffin for all the so-called fossil fuels. So this is the insanity of the lies that NPR is telling about this. Listen to what they say. What is driving prices down right now? Well, you and I would think that it is the record release of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, right? We've had far more released, as I pointed out,

it's been anywhere from 10 to 20. We've only had three strategic petroleum releases in the past. And this is anywhere from 10 to 20 times more than was ever released in the past. And he's going to be doing more just before the election. Then he's going to stop. But NPR says, no, no, it's, what is driving prices down right now? Well, it's improving refinery situation.

That's a bold-faced lie. As a matter of fact, why are the prices going up? Why are the prices not going down as much as you would expect with that kind of massive release? It's because it's gridlocked with a refinery. Even in California, where they have a record distance between the prices in California and the rest of the country, even number two, Oregon, with massive gas taxes like California has. That spread has never been higher. Why?

Because they've got a special curated blend that they require. And the refineries can't have had some issues. The only refineries that produce that have had some issues. But there's been refinery problems with some of this stuff, but it's not an improving refinery situation. Um, refineries are coming back online. They said,

and then they said, yeah, but what about the strategic petroleum reserve? What about Biden's recent announcement of another release from the strategic petroleum reserve? Well, NPR says that announcement was more of an update about the big release announced this spring.

No new barrels of oil were involved. That's just a figment of your imagination. Isn't that amazing that they could tell a lie like that and think they could get away with it? And this is their top story on their website today. Because why? Because the economy is a big attack on the economy is this attack on our energy prices. And what is happening to the economy tanking is tanking their political support.

So NPR has got to come out and shore this up for their buddies, the Democrats. It wasn't a new announcement. The market had already been expecting that. It's really not moving the needle that much. Full faceline. Again, over 217 million barrels that they've released. And the biggest we had prior to that was 31 in response to a hurricane taking out the big refineries in the southeast. That was under Obama. But anyway, what about the climate policy that the White House has set? Has that played a role in pushing prices up? No, it's not about his intention to go to zero fossil fuels. Not at all. The White House says NPR, White House says we need more oil in the

short term, but less oil in the long term. Oh, they want more oil. How are you going to achieve that? How do you get more in the short term and then cut it out? If you tell people you're going to eliminate it in the long term, they're not saying we need less of it in the long term. They're saying we're going to get zero of it in the long term. So why would anybody bother to build any refineries or increase any capacity or develop any oil resources anywhere? Of course, they won't. Could the government do more to set energy prices? So here they're addressing the Democrats who just want the government to come in and put in some price controls. That, by the way, was going to be part of what Liz Truss was doing. She was going

to kind of ease people into universal basic income by making it universal basic energy subsidies. And it was both a nudge into that direction, and it was a form of price controls. It was going to be subsidized by the government. But anyway, this is what NPR says. Could the government do more to set prices? Well, some governments around the world, says NPR, simply own oil production within their borders outright. So they get to set fuel prices for their citizens regardless of what the market prices are.

Think of Venezuela or Iran. NPR holds that up as the model. NPR thinks that Venezuela and its basket case economy or, are models for us to emulate? Why, yes, they do. Yes, they do. Because the government should control everything. And when the government controls everything, you get people starving like they are in Venezuela.

They said then the next statement, listen to this next sentence from NPR. The U.S. economy is intentionally set up very differently. Why would we do that? Why would we want a different economy than Venezuela or Iran? Well, they don't say. They just say, well, yeah, that happens in Venezuela or Iran. They have the ability. They can set the prices to whatever they want. Isn't that great? And yet we don't do that in the US. We're set up very differently. However, in Europe, in many countries where the economy is much more like the U.S., governments are currently discussing some fairly unprecedented interventions into energy markets. Maybe we should think about that. It's far too

soon to say, they said, whether the interventions will work. But right now, those similar proposals have not gained traction in Washington, D.C. That would not even have passed for an elementary school level lie in the past. But of course, our education has been dumbed down significantly. And then there's this puff piece that is circulating around. Biden, 76, drives more than 100 miles per hour while drag racing. Joe Biden raced Colin Powell's son in an episode of comedian Jay Leno's car show with the president pushing his beloved Corvette to over 100 miles per hour while drag racing. Thrill-seeking Biden and Leno reunited this summer for Wednesday's show and drove his 1967 Corvette Stingray around with James Rowley's Secret Service training facility in Maryland. Now, the interesting thing I find about this was there was a lot of talk

about the eight years while Biden was vice president with Obama. He loved his 67 Corvette Stingray, but he was not allowed to drive it, let alone drive it 100 miles an hour in a drag race. And why was that? Well, they have a rule that presidents and vice presidents are not allowed to drive the cars themselves. They have to be driven, chauffeured by secret service for their safety and so forth. And so there were a lot of stories about how Biden was upset that he wasn't allowed to drive his stingray. But now they virtue signal about it. He has to prove how virile he is and how physically, uh, up for the job he is, right? Here's a guy who can't read a teleprompter, but he can drive his Corvette

at over a hundred miles per hour. What pathetic propaganda this is. As I said, the beginning of the program, maybe they should set up a race between him and Fetterman. You could have all the leftist mainstream press out there fawning over how physically fit these two guys are. Look at this. You think that they can't really figure out what's going on? That would be something I would pay to see, quite frankly.

I would like to see that. I don't want it to be a straight drag race. I want it around a track where they got to make various turns. That's, that's, I want to, you know, people pay big money to watch car crashes. It used to be a popular event at the state fair. I have the figure eight stock car races. That's everybody or the demolition Derby. That's what that would turn into.

It'd be the Biden Fetterman demolition Derby, but's what that would turn into. It would be the Biden-Federman demolition derby. But better that they do it to their cars than that they do it to the country. Biden's marijuana pardons did not free a single federal prisoner. See, here's another example of the phoniness of this guy. He said, I'm going to free nonviolent criminals and blah, blah, blah. He had a list of qualifications there. His October the 6th proclamation, you know, done for the election, applied only to U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents

who were convicted of simple marijuana possession under the Controlled Substance Act or the District of Columbia Code. But none of them were in prison at the time he announced his pardon. They were all out in prison. Isn't that interesting, these clever little allusions that he puts out there? And I can imagine that the reason he did that was because Biden loves to put people in prison. He absolutely hates our freedoms. He hates natural rights.

He was the guy who came up with the mandatory minimums. It happened under the Reagan regime. It happened with, what was the guy's name? I can't remember his attorney general now. But it happened under them. But Biden was taking credit for the entire policy. He said, yeah, I wrote that. He was happy that he pushed all these mandatory minimums, civil asset forfeiture, assault weapon bans.

He argued with Clarence Thomas over natural law and the principles of the Declaration of Independence. He hates every freedom that he has ever seen. And he wants you to get an electric vehicle, even though he loves his 1967 gas-guzzling Corvette. And I love them, too. I think it's a great car. As a matter of fact, you're talking about going 100 miles an hour it used to i don't know if it's the model that he had the size engine that he had because they had a lot of different ones but it held the record for the longest time of being able to go from zero to 100 to zero uh because it had great acceleration great brakes

but uh yeah an electric vehicle owner has now just learned that replacing a taillight costs over $4,000. That's not a function of it being an electric car. That's a function of overengineering and of making extravagant luxury devices that only a few people are going to be able to afford while they ban them for the rest of us. That's it for today's program. Thank you for joining. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.

And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you.