The David Knight Show - 28Oct22 Will Twitter Be Liberated? Who's Funding Climate Chaos? The AR-15 and the Bowie Knife

Episode Date: October 28, 2022

Elon Musk completes the deal on Twitter and the firings begin at the top2:06The government doesn’t want discussion, the left doesn't want debate, and the advertiser’s not interested.9:20A dozen of Group M’s clients have told the agency to pause all their ads on Twitter if Trump's account is reinstated.16:45The deputized state and the deep state.19:08Paypal sneaks back in its $2,500 (minimum) fine for "violations"25:23Maryland AG tries to use prohibitions of Bowie knife as precedent to prohibit AR-15. Jim Bowie was far more dangerous than his knife — a brief look at the Sandbar Fight36:40Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) under federal investigation yet again. A look at the bipartisan corruption55:25Surprise! Nothing was done about election mail fraud. In Pennsylvania, not only can counties register voters without verification of identity, they must send a mail-in ballot to any person who requests one even if that individual1:08:46Herschel Walker widens his lead in the Georgia gubernatorial race in spite of, or because of, Gloria Allred1:13:47Clip from RFK, Jr's Fauci documentary — "Dark Winter Simulation"1:22:59MNA vaccines injure the heart of ALL vaccine recipients, study finds.1:27:40Study: Cardiac Arrest Emergency Calls Rise with Booster Fatality Rates.1:33:33Covid vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the spike protein.1:36:02Paul demands answers over vaccine company’s embedded staff within CDC to promote vaccines.1:42:38Who's funding "JUST STOP OIL" attacks on art, culture and liberty?1:48:28What’s going to be the selling point for banning cryptocurrency?1:53:49The hunt for habitable planets may have just gotten far more narrow says a new study. CNN admits the presence of CARBON is ESSENTIAL TO LIFE!2:05:06A wind farm is being dismantled in western Germany to make way for an expansion of an open-pit coal mine, a paradoxical situation highlighting the2:11:47Coal is the workhorse of China’s energy industry.2:20:38China increased its orders for Russian coal after the lockdowns halted some of the key domestic operations, but didn’t have the railroad capacity2:26:17Rube Goldberg complex contraptions of technology — latest example is a fuel cell / battery hybrid EV semitrailer where the liquid hydrogen has to be kept cooled to near ABSOLUTE ZERO2:34:10Put through hell, a Christian baker emerges victorious against LGBT targeted persecution. 2:39:38How Gary Johnson, LP candidate, was wrong about bakers being coerced by LGBT and wrong about the rights of big corporations to censor on the internet2:48:23Nigerian Christians, 70 killed in just a couple of days, demand government arm them with AK-47's to defend themselves if government won't do it2:56:10Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday, the 28th of October, year of our Lord 2022, day 960 of the emergency. That just continues. So today we're going to take a look again at elections. Where are we right now? What is about to happen?

Is it going to make a difference? Are we still playing under the same corrupt rules that Trump and his people are talking about for two years but did nothing to fix. Yes, we are. But we're going to take a look at the economy. We're going to take a look at what's going on with the purchase of Twitter. We have a new company that is going to change your nightmares into happy dreams. I think we could call that nightmare tech. Let these people hack into your brain. Yes, of course.

Why not? We'll be right back. Stay with us. Well, Elon Musk completed the deal on Twitter yesterday. I've got to say I'm surprised. I really didn't think he wanted it. But anyway, he's moving ahead with it. And the first thing he did, this is a good news. He fired the CEO, Parag Awal. I'm glad that he did that. That guy was one of the most, uh, in your face authoritarian censors I've ever seen in

my life. Uh, fired the CEO, fired the CFO, chief financial officer, fired the head of legal trust and safety, which would be putting out the policies for censorship. So these are all very positive signs. So he did that immediately and he put out a letter to advertisers. And this is a little bit of what he had to say. He said, there's been much speculation about why I bought Twitter and what i think about advertising most of it has been wrong the reason i acquired twitter said elon musk is because it is important to the future of civilization to have a common digital town square we'll talk about that where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy

manner without resorting to violence. There is currently great danger that social media will splinter into far right and far left echo chambers that generate more hate and divide our society. So in other words, instead of having conservative social media places and liberal social media places, we all need to have one place where we can all get along, unify everybody on his platform. He said, if we split this off into left and right echo chambers, the opportunity for dialogue is lost.

Well, absolutely it is. But does the opportunity for dialogue is lost. Well, absolutely it is. But does the left want dialogue? Certainly the former CEO of Twitter did not want dialogue. And where is this coming from? Well, this is coming from ESG. It's coming from demands from government. It's actually coming from demands from advertisers. And the reason he wrote this letter to advertisers is because the big corporate advertisers are putting pressure on not just the government but the big advertisers are the same people like you know larry fink at black rock pushing esg pushing and pushing and pushing and so these advertising companies are doing the same thing saying you better censor stuff

interestingly enough they're not censoring porn. I mean, a lot of people pointing out that, um, I don't know how they did the metric, but they said 13% of the site is porn. And as I said, a couple of weeks ago, I had never seen any of that before ever. I looked for a particular hashtag and I'm going down the hashtag looking, and it was a political hashtag. And all of a sudden, you know, porn shows up. Maybe they had put something on their tweet to jump into whatever they saw was trending. That's probably what they did.

But it's like, whoa. And I, you know, flip past that and keep going down and see another one. It's like, all right, we're done. I mean, I just despise what Twitter has become. It is a cesspool of censorship and pornography. And so I'm going to have to be convinced before I play in that space anymore. Anyway, he said, I bought it to try to help humanity. He said, that said, Twitter obviously cannot become a free-for-all hellscape.

A free-for-all hellscape. Well, there you go. That's a different phrase. Usually we hear people when they complain about freedom, they say, well, it's going to be the Wild West. And it's like, yeah, that's right. That's why I like the Wild West. It was free.

It was very free. You know, they shot Liberty Valance, brought in the lawyers. That's the subliminal message of that. One of my favorite films. I watched it so many times until I was like, wait a minute. What are they telling me here? Why did they call that guy Liberty? Right. They could have called him anything, but they called the bad guy Liberty. Uh, I wonder if Jimmy Stewart and John Wayne got the subtle message hidden in

that anyway. Uh, so it's not the wild West, but it is a free for all hellscape. That's right. If you want something that's really hellish, you give people freedom. That's what Musk said,

where anything can be said without consequences and so he said in addition to adhering to the laws of the land our platform must be warm and welcoming to all except the people that they disagree with evidently uh and i've played this for you before what he's talking about is a global town square right not just talking about a global town square, right? I'm not just talking about a digital town square. Jack Dorsey said that multiple times under oath in testimony when he was being asked about Twitter. I counted at least eight times that he said that. We are the town square.

He said it. It was not some regulator saying, you're the town square, so you're going to do what we do. No, he said, we are the town square. That's what we started talking about. Well, Marsh v. Alabama says even if the town square is privately owned, as it was by that coal mining town company in 1946, the Supreme Court said even if you privately own the town square, you can't censor free speech in the town square.

But Jack Dorsey, who owned the de facto town square, and he said, that's our business model, they were censoring people. That's not how Twitter began. Twitter at the beginning was known for a free speech. Perhaps he didn't agree with it. I mean, Jack Dorsey's been one of the ones working with Elon Musk behind the scenes to try to figure out how they're going to fix Twitter.

So maybe he is really about free speech, and maybe Elon Musk really does want free speech. Maybe he really does want to have a place where people can debate ideas and issues. But if he's going to come back and then put the caveat there, we don't want to have a free-for-all hellscape where people can just say whatever they want.

And we will obey the laws that are presented to us. You understand that because this is going to be, again, he calls it a digital town square, but what he means is it's going to be a global, global town square. And that means that your freedom is going to be a race to the least amount of freedom that any jurisdiction allows. And we know that the European Union is pushing very hard to remove all freedom of speech. And as soon as Musk announced that he was going to buy Twitter, he got the visit from the EU bureaucrat to advise him

of the new censorship laws that they had just put in and to tell him that he needed to comply. And here's the very cringy video where Elon Musk bowed and scraped before this censoring EU bureaucrat. So we are in Austin together with Elon Musk. Thank you very much, Elon, for welcoming me. Thank you. You're most welcome. And, of course, we discussed many issues,

and I was happy to be able to explain to you the DSA, a new regulation in Europe. And I think that now you understand very well. It fits pretty well with what you think we should do on our platform. No, I think it's exactly aligned with my thinking. I very much agree with... It's been a great discussion.

I'm so glad you explained it to me. I agree with everything you said, really. I think we're very much of the same mind. I will obey. I think just uh anything that uh you want my companies can do that would be beneficial to europe we want to do that i just want to say no thank you very much that's a again a good example then uh when we we see that it could be some differences especially when we are speaking things so important for our fellow

citizens yes as a life and the digital space the best is to come and discuss what we did. And I'm happy to see that for your life. Sounds good. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Yes, yes. Whatever you want. Whatever you want.

At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses

on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding

specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Look, the government does not want discussion. The government does not want dissent. The left doesn't want discussion either.

They don't want debate. They don't want dialogue. You know that when you've seen this over and over again, you have the left show up with their signs. And you've seen over and over again, people from the right or conservative media will walk up to them and say, well, tell me a little bit about your position or whatever. Racist, racist. If they even say anything, they just look at them and scream, racist, racist. They don't want to have a discussion.

The government doesn't want to have it, and the advertisers do not want to have it either. As a matter of fact, and I've had several people point this out to me, but I noticed it as well. Pulled up, I've got it side, I think it's vertical so that you can see it, the picture there. I said, will this type of thing change? I tweeted this to Elon Musk. I doubt he saw it. I said, will this type of thing change? Or will you continue with the Twitter business model of becoming a porn site?

Because, you know, pull it up and show the picture there that I had tweeted out. The video segment about Hobby Lobby. And the founder, David Green. And what he was talking about in terms of his understanding of his relationship with money not being controlled by it. Very appropriate, isn't it? For Elon Musk, perhaps Elon Musk should watch that video. This guy doesn't have as many billions as Elon Musk does.

He's only got $13.7 billion. But he came to the understanding that he didn't want to be controlled by that and he was going to uh serve christ instead of that and so because that is on bit shoot everything on bit shoot is uh you know there's there's warnings there's been warnings when you would um this is the tweet that's in there. Just scroll down. Anyway, even if we can't find the visual of it, let me just continue with it. If you would click on the links for BitChute,

YouTube would come up, not YouTube, Twitter would come up with a long explanation. This is a very dangerous site. Warning, you shouldn't go here. I mean, you're going to get in all kinds of trouble. You might get all, you know, they might hack your computer, destroy your computer, whatever. Absolute nonsense.

This is dangerous. This is a dangerous site. It's dangerous information that they don't want you to have because it's not censored information. Any information that is not censored, that is not government approved, is dangerous. There was nothing dangerous and is nothing dangerous about BitChute. It's just the fact that it's free it makes it the Wild West it makes it some kind of free-for-all hellscape so stay away from bit shoot right or other places that they instantly throw that up but we put the link up there for bit shoot for that video and for most of the

videos because that's where we get more video more views than the other platforms there probably should be focusing over to Odyssey. Again, when I put up the outline, fairly detailed now, of the show after the fact and time codes and where it is. And that's in the description at all the video sites. It's also in the description on the podcast, but it's going to be shifted a little bit because of the ads. But if you click on it at Odyssey, it'll take you right to that spot. It's the only one that does that. So we should be putting on Odyssey up,

but by putting up BitChute, they've always scared people. You can continue if you click on a little link right at the very bottom right, that is very, very, very small print. Okay, go ahead anyway. That's it. That's it. Thank you. That's it anyway.

But now they've got a new tactic here. They put up a thing in front of the graphic, and it says this tweet may link to a harmful website. So they've accelerated this. I heard that all these people who were into censorship and leftist propaganda, all these Marxists were running away to other tech companies, but evidently not because they are adding even more things to prevent you from seeing videos. So I've had a lot of people send that to me. I'm not so sure that things are going to change that much. I think he'll probably bring back, for example, Babylon B and, uh, that'll be

used as a, see, we're all about free speech. We're going to allow a conservative satire site to actually do comedy. How about that? Let's pat ourselves on the back and break our arm doing it uh but um there's been a lot of advertisers in these corporate organizations that if you bring back trump we're going to kill all of our ads and that's the kind of pressure that he's facing so he's facing pressure from governments especially the eu he's facing pressure from advertisers. And you just saw what he does when he's confronted with that pressure. That's not even a backroom thing.

He publicly cringed and bowed and scraped in front of that guy. Put up the video. So Bloomberg says, well, advertisers are nervous that after Musk gets in, you're going to have Nazi child porn and hate speech that will inevitably return. Return? As far as the porn stuff goes, they never, you notice they put child porn there. As far as the porn goes, that's exploded on Twitter. And hate speech is in the eye of the beholder, right?

There's no commercial viability, says Bloomberg, for a network that doesn't have some level of content moderation. Advertisers and users aren't going to show up and post during their workday alongside pornography and extremism. And you know what they consider to be extremists is comments from Christians who they say are hateful, that type of thing. So in deciding how free Musk wants speech to be, he may have to alienate users in order to get there, says Bloomberg. Wall Street Journal says, after a dozen of Group M's clients, there's a big advertising agency on Madison Avenue.

And by the way, you know where Madison Avenue got its start? Who was the father of Madison Avenue? Edward Bernays, the guy who was the master propagandist. Before there was Goebbels for Adolf Hitler, there was Edward Bernays for Woodrow Wilson to use propaganda and lies to get us involved in World War I. After that, he took his skills to Madison Avenue and used it to get us to buy soap and cigarettes or whatever.

So yeah, Madison Avenue, the Edward Bernays boys. Wall Street Journal says about a dozen of Group M's clients, which own an array of well-known consumer brands have told the agency to pause all their ads on twitter if mr trump's account is reinstated yeah there's not going to be political censorship there at all right i mean i'm you know if you watch my show i'm fan of Trump, but he ought to be allowed to speak. Because when he speaks, he just digs a bigger hole for himself. But anyway, I'll forgive him a lot of rope to hang himself.

According to a document reviewed by the Wall Street Journal, Robert Pearsall, managing director of social activation. You got too big of a company when you got a managing director for social activation. At Omnicron Media Group, another big advertising firm, said Twitter has made agreements to improve its brand safety controls to meet Omicron's standards. And it's Omicon, not Omicron. Sounds like they're trying to go viral, right? standards and it's Omicron, not Omicron. Uh, it sounds like, uh, they're trying to go viral,

right? Uh, but it hasn't introduced these changes to the market yet. There are significant concerns about the implications of a possible change to content moderation policy. Uh, but Twitter has said it's working on tools to give advertisers a better idea of where their ads appear.

So again, 89% of their revenue, about five, uh, 89% of their $5 billion revenue that they had last year, 89% of it came from ads. I don't know what the rest of it comes from. Uh, so, you know, they're either going to have their money cut off or they're either, either going to be declared illegal and have their website cut off by the european union or something like that he will do whatever he is told and the same people who have been pushing this stuff remember what we're talking about here is corporate governance and it's very very useful especially for the u.s government where we have specific legal

prohibitions from doing this type of thing. They can deputize. You want to talk about the Wild West and free speech? No, what we have now are corporations who have been deputized to do what the government has prohibited from doing directly. And the government says, well, you do this or we shut you down. And then you have the big Wall Street and banker financial interests. You push people into this ESG stuff. You take away what they've got and push us into the Great Reset.

Or we're going to take away your money first. So you can either be poor like everybody else or you can do what we say. And you can be part of our club. We've talked for a long time about the deep state. The deep state is the permanently entrenched bureaucracy. Think somebody like Fauci and his ilk, people who were there for decades, people who are unelected and unaccountable to we the people,

the people who create the rules and regulations, who enforce them, who fine us. And of course, there's no presumption of innocence. There's no due process. There's no protection against excessive fines. We have taxation without representation. We have regulation without representation because of the deep state, the permanently entrenched bureaucracy.

Now we've got something in addition to this, and you're going to be seeing this more and more. It's really been accelerating over the last few years. What I would call it is the deputized state. So we have the deep state bureaucracy, which is really what Washington has become. We got a do-nothing Congress. They just sit there, they hold hearings, and they whine and they complain, but they never change anything. And then we have the deputized state. And that's what these big corporations have become, the deputized state. And Elon Musk, who has made his entire fortune by pleasing government and getting paid subsidies for that. The guy who is looking to hack into your brain and to push us into a merger with machines to create cyborgs is Neuralink Corporation. We should call him Neuromusk.

Well, Neuromusk and his singularity and his pal, his other PayPal pal, both of them are into the PayPal mafia, all of them. Peter Thiel, all of them, want to push you into the singularity and to transhumanism. They're not on our side. It's just that simple. Don't be fooled by this. It'll be interesting to see what, if any, freedom is put there initially. Perhaps in anticipation of such a smear and to front-run any advertising concerns,

Musk has tweeted that letter that I just read you some excerpts from. But anyway, the Wall Street Journal doesn't think that that's going to happen, and I don't think it's really going to happen. Remember his words from yesterday. He said, a beautiful thing about Twitter is how it empowers citizen journalism. People are able to disseminate news without an establishment bias. Well, Zero Hedge put that in and said, well, let's hope that this is true. I don't have much hope for that. But anyway, they've only had about a thousand employees leave Twitter since he announced he was going to buy it. And in the last couple of months,

about half of those people have left. So it started to accelerate somewhat. They appear to be going to Google, going to meta and that type of thing. So we're looking at so far the people who've gone back and looked at the data on LinkedIn and, uh, scraped that data because it's publicly available. If you want to go to LinkedIn and that's the whole thing, everything that you put on the internet, everything that you put on social media, including LinkedIn, all of that stuff can be analyzed by anybody. The government or anybody.

You've put that information out there about yourself. And so by looking at LinkedIn, Pinterest, Snap, TikTok, they are able to, but mainly LinkedIn is how they mapped where these people are going. And they found that they're going to these other tech companies, Google, Meta, Pinterest, Snap, TikTok, even LinkedIn itself. So Musk has said, even though that's about 1,100 people, according to the ones who have looked at this, he says he's going to fire about 75% of the employees, about 5,500 employees. So we'll see whether or not that happens. Either way, Twitter was already looking at financial issues,

not just a recession, but they haven't been doing well. Twitter officials had already announced that they were going to cut payroll by nearly a billion dollars, $800 million by the end of 2023. So even if, um, you know, uh, Elon Musk may accelerate that, uh, by giving 75% of them a pink slip, uh,

he is also not big on what, um, has become fashionable with Google and these other people. He told his employees at Tesla, he said, I want you in the office a minimum of 40 hours a week. And he said, and I mean a minimum of 40 hours a week. He can stress that. He says, you want to work at home? That's fine. You do that in addition to being in the office 40 hours a week.

So it's going to be interesting to see what happens with it. But again, I'm not too optimistic. I think what's going to happen is just window dressing. We've seen this happen now with PayPal. Remember the big kerfuffle a couple of weeks ago where PayPal came out with some new rules and said, well, if we don't like what you say, we're going to fine you $2,500 per instance. And that happened right as they were kicking off Daily Skeptic and Free Speech Union and the guy who ran it. All three of his accounts just taken off quickly like PayPal did me. He was banned from PayPal and Venmo just like me. And so he who ran it, all three of his accounts just taken off quickly, like PayPal did me.

He was banned from PayPal and Venmo just like me. And so he talked about it. And he had enough traction that other people in the media talked about it. And members of parliament talked about it. And PayPal pulled back. And then right after that, some people noticed this new change in terms of service about, well, we will not only kick you off, but we will confiscate any money that you have in your account up to $2,500 per alleged incident of violation of our rules. And so now they've put it back. They've reintroduced the exact same provision,

but they have just rewritten the terms of service. Remember what the lie that they said at the time? At the time they said, well, no, that was somebody made a mistake. We didn't mean to do that. And people were saying, are you kidding me? You put out this massive legal document about terms of service and you did it by mistake? Yeah, right.

And this is yet another piece of evidence that, yes, they were absolutely lying about it because they've just reordered things, and they've separated the fine from the discussion about violating their terms of service. So you acknowledge and agree by continuing to use this, that $2,500 per violation of acceptable use policy is a reasonable minimum. A reasonable minimum. They're not saying that that's going to be the limit. It's a reasonable minimum.

That's something that I haven't seen people who've pointed this out. And then further down down much further down one of the things you know things like selling counterfeit goods or something like that well then they are you act in a manner that is defamatory and trade libelous and threatening and harassing different then after that all these things and they've got about you know a dozen different things that they can ding you for. One of them is to provide false, inaccurate, or misleading information, according to them. So it's back. It's back.

They had planned to do that all along. We're going to take a look. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

Quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God that is what we have in common that is what they want to take away their most powerful weapons are isolation deception intimidation they desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com

Let's take a look at the news before we get into elections uh we have several articles have come out about justice alito who is complaining about the leak of the decision that he wrote about abortion and overturning roe v wade he said the leak made conservative justices, quote, targets for assassination. Well, he's exactly right. And the big question, which is still hanging out there, and people are not talking about it, is why has there not been an investigation of this? I mean, if there had been an investigation of this, they would have an answer by now, right? Which I said from the very beginning, I believe that the leaker was none other than John Roberts.

And John Roberts, I said, and you'll know it's John Roberts if they don't do an investigation, find out who it is. They've only got about 80 or so people. And they all work for the Supreme Court. So it's the clerks and the justices themselves. It's like, you know, show me your information, especially the clerks. And thatices themselves. It's like, show me your information, especially the clerks. And that has not been done. That is the smoking gun that I think tells you who really did this,

and I think it's one of the reasons why he's speaking out about it. You're talking about risk. We have the Maryland Attorney General is now trying to justify the assault weapon ban and based on what the supreme court has said they said well your your laws have to be in alignment with what has historically been done and so interestingly enough the maryland attorney general goes back to bowie knife prohibitions to prohibit an assault weapon yes that's right uh the uh the bowie knife prohibitions to prohibit an assault weapon. Yes, that's right. The Bowie knife was a big, serious weapon at the time. And it's kind of like Crocodile Dundee, you know, the classic line where he says, guys pull a knife on him and they go. And he says, do you think that's a knife?

This is a knife. And he pulls out his big knife, which is bigger even than a Bowie knife. But rules about Bowie knives are now being used to justify a ban on another distinctly American weapon, the so-called assault weapon. Semi-automatic assault-style weapons passes constitutional muster because it is in keeping with the nation's history of restricting, quote, extraordinarily dangerous, unquote, offensive weapons, dating back to the Bowie knife in the early 1800s, says the state's attorney general in arguments before the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last week. His historical defense of weapons ban follows the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling last summer that gun regulations are constitutionally valid if they comport with the text, the history,

and the tradition of firearm restrictions when the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, or when the 14th Amendment extended the right to keep and bear arms to the states in 1868. So, he said, just as novel weapons in the 1830s, says the Attorney General, triggered novel regulation, the advent of mass shootings and assault rifles in the late 20th century created a need for regulation to address those heightened dangers, said the Maryland Attorney General, Frosch. And just as in an earlier era, new weapons were regulated because of their damaging potential and offensive use, while having limited self-defense functions, assault weapons used in mass shootings inflict carnage on the human body,

much worse than bullets from non-assault weapons. And just as Bowie knives were closely associated with criminality. Oh, really? So too are assault weapons disproportionately used in gang crime, mass shootings, and other crimes. As a matter of fact, what is really troubling about all of this stuff? Is that the Bowie knife was used as part of an insurrection. You realize that, don't you? Well, when Santa Ana came for the guns, what did they do?

Well, they gave him the cannon. You know, you look at Gilead and the flag. It's like, come and take it. What was it? Was it a picture of an assault weapon? No. A rifle? No.

A Bowie knife? No. A cannon? Yes. That's what's on the original come and take it. We forget about that because there's been so many updates of that with come and take it and they have a silhouette of an AR-15 or something like that.

But it was really about a cannon. And they were going for cannons. The British were going for cannons at concord and lexington these were all military weapons as a matter of fact some of the first gun control that we had in the early 20th century was against sawed-off shotguns being prohibited and that crooked case the miller case which the guy was a criminal and the whole thing was a setup and he died before his case got to the Supreme court,

but they took it anyway without having anybody represent his side because he's dead. It should have been a moot case, right? Because the guy himself was moot and mute. He was dead. He's dead. He's not dead.

He's kind of like the parrots from Monty Python. Well, he was dead, and they went ahead and did the ruling anyway because the whole thing was already set up. And their argument was, well, you can't have a sawed-off shotgun because that's not a military weapon. Notice how they changed tactics.

Now they say, well, you can't have an AR-15 because that's like a military weapon. Well, the reality is, is that even that argument was flawed when they did it in the Miller case because sawed-off shotguns had been used in the Civil War. And it was especially noteworthy that some Confederate cavalry used sawed-off shotguns in their cavalry charges rather than bayonets. It's a lot more effective, by the way. In case you're thinking of a cavalry charge, the sawed-off shotguns were far more deadly in close combat than a sawed-off shotgun. But we do have a history in the Wild West of people like wyatt erp doing gun control in their towns

you think about the movie the unforgiven with clint eastwood the gene hackman character little bill there were sheriffs like that there really were but as they point out in this article they said well first of all you know you notice that in that supreme court's ruling it was kind kind of strange. It was like, you know, what was traditional, you know, for the laws at that time? What was traditional at the time the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791? And what was traditional and historical after the 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868? Well, the Bowie knife falls in between those two periods. And they point that out in this op-ed piece. They said, well, when those laws were passed, the idea of incorporation wasn't a thing. And what he means by that is that with the 14th Amendment, they're saying, well, we're going to incorporate the federal constitution in your

laws. And whether or not you agree with that, all officials are taking an oath to the U.S. Constitution as well as your state constitution and other things like that. So whether or not you think that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, it is if they take an oath to it, no doubt about it. They're taking that oath to the Constitution as a condition of their job. And so if they take that oath to it, no doubt about it. They're taking that oath to the Constitution as a condition of their job. And so if they take that oath, they have to abide by it. Or they lose their authority. They don't lose their power, unfortunately, but they do lose their legitimate authority

if they defy their oath to the Constitution. And so in this piece, he says, But then there's Frosch's argument that the the ar-15 other so-called assault weapons are uniquely dangerous and play a significant role in criminal activities we keep hearing this from anti-gun officials so is it a military weapon oh well ban it is it dangerous is is it used by gangs oh well then uh we have to ban it. None of that is a justification, and neither is the argument as to whether or not there's incorporation. Look, the text, or even what the customary laws are,

that's an odd thing for the Supreme Court to put in, because the text is the text. There's only a couple of justices in the Supreme Court that think that the text actually means anything. Because they want the Constitution to be a living document, they will look at tradition. They'll look at a lot of different things. And, of course, it's the same type of thing that we have in religion as well. You have the more liberal organizations will say, well, let's take a look at the culture.

What is customary? What's going on in other countries? What is our church tradition you know what is the pope saying or whatever but if you get back to it you can't you can't have multiple sources of authority you're going to have one source of authority at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro

if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie So if the way I understand politics politics that one source of authority is going to be the constitution that they've sworn to uphold and they're going to be bound by the u.s constitution state constitution and those laws that are written under that and you know from a religious standpoint you're not going to be able to constantly evolve what you want to do unless it comports with the Christian constitution, if you're a Christian, of the Bible.

That becomes the hard source of that. And you want to have something like that because otherwise you wind up with a dictatorship of some religious leader or of some denominational group that is going to get together and say, well, you know, we're just going to forget this whole Christian thing. We're going to go in another direction. We'll call it Christian. We'll keep the buildings and the money and the institutions, but we're going to go in another direction. No, the only thing that

you can do to keep that kind of drift from happening is to go by the text of the Bible or go by the text of the Constitution. But it is interesting to see the Bowie knife come in it because you should go back and you should read the history. Everybody knows the history of James Bowie at the Alamo. Unfortunately, he was sick pretty much and wasn't that much of a player at the Alamo. But he'd been pretty famous as a brawler throughout the Wild West. It's one of the reasons it wasn't just that his knife,

his reputation preceded his knife. And there was a particular fight that even has articles written about this particular fight, the Sandbar Fight, also known as the Vidalia Sandbar Fight, a formal one-on-one duel that then erupted into a violent brawl involving combatants on both sides. So when they have these duels, this happened in 1827, when they have these duels, right, you have backup people on either side,

seconds or whatever. And as this one-on-one duel began, everybody got involved in it. It was supposedly the subjects of the dispute included competing financial interests, allegations of vote fixing. Maybe this is what they're afraid of are they worried that all these allegations about the corrupt election are going to evolve into another sandbar fight you have trump on one side and biden on the other uh or perhaps even the honor of a woman several participants in the brawl had previously engaged in duels fistfights and exchanges of gunfire two previous attempts at resolving disputes by dueling

had ended without resolution, either because they degenerated into shouting matches between the seconds or because one party failed to show up. But I won't read the entire breakdown of this. I think you would find it very interesting. At one point, they said they have 17 men there at the uh at the duel and at some point um things got really rough with uh jim bowie and um a brief 90 second brawl uh left uh several people dead jim bowie badly wounded uh as a matter of fact what happened to uh cause this to devolve

from a duel into a brawl was that um uh the uh the one guy fired and uh hit bowie in the hip knocking him to the ground uh then these two guys exchanged gunfire. Bowie was on the side there. And they wounded each other. One of them took a shot to the chest. Bowie got up on his feet, drew his knife out, and charged at the other guy, who struck him so hard on the head with his pistol that it broke and sent Bowie to his knees.

Wright appeared to a pistol shot at the fallen Bowie, missing. Wright then drew his sword cane and stabbed Bowie in the chest, but the thin blade was deflected by his sternum. As he attempted to pull the brave light free, Bowie reached up, grabbed his shirt, pulled him down on the point of his Bowie knife. That's not a knife. This is a knife. This is one of the reasons why the Bowie knife had such a great reputation, because the other one stuck in his sternum and didn't go through. But the Bowie knife absolutely finished the thing. So that made Jim Bowie very famous amongst some other things. And it's kind of interesting when you go back and you look at these interesting stories like that.

And we have the Hollywood has focused on the Wild West. And things like the shootout at the O.K. Corral. Nobody's ever done the sandbar fight there. But I don't think there's been any filming of that, not that I know of. But you have these famous incidents like the OK Corral and things like that. And yet the reality is, and there's a very good book called Gunfighters, Highwaymen, and Vigilantes. Maybe not in that particular order, but those are the three that were in there that I read a few years ago. And in it, he makes it very clear that these sensational stories of these big fights, duels and whatever, were by far the exception to the rule.

The Wild West was far safer, far, far safer than Chicago or pretty much most of New York, most of the big cities. And the reason it was far safer was because people were armed and they were openly armed. And so you had people who were highway robbers. You had people who liked to have duels and gunfights in the street. But when that would happen, everybody would just kind of get back. It typically didn't involve people other than them.

If it did involve people other than them, the sheriff got the posse together, the posse comitatus, the power of the community, and they went after these guys. And so it was far more peaceful than what we have now because of all that anyway i thought that was an interesting odd thing for the attorney general of maryland to try to use the bowie knife to ban guns can you imagine what how j Jim Bowie would react to something like that? Or even to a rigged election, which is what that duel might have been about. Meanwhile, Jon Stewart went on to a podcast, and he and the liberal podcast host both agreed that Hunteriden and what he's been caught doing and the

information that's on the hunter biden laptop and him being on the brisma board says uh john stewart that is corruption straight up straight up corruption so he went on with a british journalist gabriel gatehouse conversation eventually turned to hunter Hunter Biden's laptop and why so many people erroneously dismissed it as merely quote Russian disinformation. And so Stewart says, well, let's say that it was real and people just thought, well, the one thing in it may be 10% of the big guy, which is circumstantial at best.

But as far as like, look, Hunter Biden is being on the board of Burisma, interjected Gatehouse. And then Stewart said, well, to me, that's corruption straight up off the bat. So during the conversation, Stewart argued the hunter biden's business ties in ukraine and these ties represented a major ethical lapse that surpassed even the laptop the idea he said that nepotism would allow much larger amounts of money to flow into the hands of people unqualified to be in the positions that they've been accepted in because you think those countries are trying to buy influence? Oh, yeah.

Welcome to the effing world. And I think it's a huge problem on its face. Forget about any secret laptop. Just the fact that he's on the board of Burisma and he doesn't have any qualifications to be on the board of anything. He doesn't have any qualifications. I mean, they weren't selling drugs or anything. I mean, if they were selling drugs or they had a porn site,

yeah, you could understand why Hunter Biden would be on their board, but they weren't in that business, and he had absolutely nothing to offer them in the oil business. So Gatehouse, the host, admitted that he had initially brushed off the laptop story, but you know, that's just, um, something else that's, uh, essentially icing on the cake and it has a lot of incriminating evidence and what's interesting about this, this is not, these people are now finally two years later admitting, yeah, that's the case.

It's now safe to admit that. Why? Maybe they're looking at the fact that Biden is on his last legs. How much longer can the big guy hold on? He's down to 10% capacity right now. He's always getting a 10% cut. Well, his mental faculties have been reduced by probably 90%. So how much longer is he going to last?

Will the Republicans invoke the 25th Amendment, get him out or something like that? So now maybe, you know, it's safe to criticize it. Now maybe it's just gotten so obvious that they can't deny it any longer. That's going to happen, by the way, and already is starting to happen with the vaccine. So I have people like Ben Shapiro who shilled for it for years now admitting yeah you know i was fooled um these people say yeah i was fooled by all that at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly.

18plusgamblingcare.ie. But I think it's interesting that you have these people on the left who are finally owning up to the reality that they have denied for two years. You talk about things that are dangerous and why we need to have censorship, they'll say on Twitter. Well, it's because Fauci is saying, repeated lies from the right, repeated attacks on me and on Biden

are, quote, a danger to democracy. So take their guns, take their knives, take their First Amendment as well. This is the argument that's going to be made for all this stuff. And this is how the censorship is going to roll out. Any criticism of Mr. Science? Oh, well, you know, you're not criticizing me. You're criticizing science.

You're talking to me. And that's the way this is going to roll. And it's also going to roll out that the big guys will never be censored. No matter what Joe Rogan says, Spotify is going to keep him. No matter what Kanye says, the Spotify chief is criticizing him for his comments, but he's not going to remove his music. But I can't be on Spotify. Isn't that interesting? so universal criticism from the corporations and of course you know purging him from these other corporations but not from Spotify no matter what Joe Rogan does Joe Rogan can push

psychedelic mushrooms or anything else he can say the types of things now that the left will purge anybody else for anywhere else and yet Spotify will keep them in Spotify. I find that interesting because Spotify is the only platform to censor me, but they don't care about the other stuff. Evidently it's simply about the money. I guess they thought they weren't going to make as much money from me as they do from Kanye and Joe Rogan. And they're right. They wouldn't make that much money from me.

Sigourney Weaver. I'm thinking about San Francisco now. The state congressman there. Anyway, Sigourney Weaver is going to be playing a 14-year-old in an Avatar sequel. Wow. Where's the cancel crowd on that? I mean, I thought we weren't supposed to be able to do anything. Even actors and actresses weren't supposed to play any roles that they weren't in real life. You know, that was the dig that they would always have against a lot of, uh, very famous actors like John Wayne,

for example, you know, he's not an actor, he's a character, you know, he, he plays the same character and everything else pretty accurate, a description of John Wayne I mean you know even they put him in a cameo appearance and one of these New Testament films they put him in as a Roman centurion and they obviously just shot this thing it only took as long as it took them to put him in the costume of a Roman centurion they put him up against a background. Charlie, he was a son of God, you know? It was hysterical. And they did it just so they could say John Wayne was in the movie, right? He wasn't doing any acting. Because we all know Roman soldiers have British accents, right?

But no, I mean, we've had a lot of of people you get thrown out of the role because you know you're not a person of color or because uh you're not the right ethnicity or you're not the right gender orientation or whatever right and so now you got sigourney weaver is going to be playing a 14 year old girl how is that happening it's computer generated characters of course isn't that chronological misappropriation i mean somebody needs to cancel this can't be allowed they're sending some very dangerous precedents here lewis tart thank you very much for the tip on rock fin he says the left redefines words so often it seems like we missed the redefinition of democracy to simply mean rule

by the democrat party yeah you're exactly right yeah rule by the Democrat party. Yeah, you're exactly right. Yeah. Rule by the Democrat party. They make the rules and we follow them or we get purged. I'll end this news segment here with a positive story. This is a very nice story. I've had this a couple of days and meant to get to it last couple of days. This is a guy in Kentucky going to a University of Kentucky basketball game. He's a coal miner.

And I'll pull up this article so people can see the picture of this guy. He shows up at the University of Kentucky basketball game. And he's really dirty. It's just a dirty job. It's really dirty. Is this a dirty job? It's a difficult and dirty job. And, um, he's almost in blackface there.

There's so much coal smeared over him and he's in his work clothes. And so somebody take a picture of him covered in soot, Kentucky coal miner, Michael McGuire rushed to Pikeville over the weekend to watch a Wildcats basketball game with his young son and wife. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.

The man's appearance caught a lot of attention, including the gaze of the University of Kentucky head coach, John Calipari, if I'm pronouncing his name right. Anyway, the head coach was so moved by his commitment to his wife and son that he posted about the coal miner's presence at the game and even offered VIP treatment to the family. And then people looked on social media. They were able to identify the guy. Coach said he would provide free tickets to the miner and his family for a future home game

he said it was a social media and kentucky fans who helped him to identify the coal miner who told the local news outlet that he had to make a choice he said i could either uh go straight to the game from work or i could miss half the game and go home and take a shower and everything. He said, um, the coach said, uh, um, I'm sorry, the, um, uh, the, the minor said, I couldn't believe, uh, what was happening when everybody went crazy about that. They said, um, it's mind blowing that everybody just came together like that. And, um, so there again, uh, you see a guy who puts his family first is the, I guess the message that we have there. And, uh, he was honored for that. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, You're listening to The David Knight Show.

Yeah, it's time for an election update. We're going to take a look at what is happening in the horse races, or maybe the elephant races, elephant donkey races. Who is coming out ahead? A lot of talk about what is happening in this. Is it going to make a difference? Or are they really kind of united in a strange kind of way? Well, I think that really is the case.

It's a pageant. It's a pageant. It's a pageant. That's what it is. That's what it is. You have, as evidence of that, you have Democrat Senator Bob Menendez now under federal investigation yet again. Remember this guy? This New Jersey senator?

He was involved in a pay-for-play corruption. He was investigated by the Department of Justice, and now the Department of Justice, under a different administration even, is coming back with essentially the same accusations, but with different people. This is not the same case, but these are other people. In other words, there's kind of like this ongoing method, an MO of this guy. He keeps doing this over and over again, but with different people each time. Will he get away with it this time? Well, last time, one of the things that helped him to get away with it was he had Lindsey Graham show up as a character witness and, you know, going across the aisle, partners in crime. A digital media outlet, Semaphore,

reported that the Southern District of New York prosecutors are investigating Melendez and have sent at least one subpoena in the case. It stems from facts that are similar to a 2015 Department of Justice case against Melendez. They put it in one place as Melendez, the other one as Melendez. I think it against Menendez. They put it in one place as Menendez. The other one as Melendez. I think it is Menendez.

It seems to be the majority opinion of whoever was doing the typing at Breitbart. They put it in as Menendez. I know about him. I don't know him well enough to know if it's Menendez or Melendez, but I think it is Menendez. Anyway, this was back in 2015. So it was the Department of Justice under Obama coming after a Democrat. And then it was the Department of Justice now again under Biden coming after a Democrat for obvious corruption. And it was Lindsey Graham who rode to his rescue and Donald Trump who rode to his rescue. Interesting, isn't it?

The uni party. Anyway, so the case in 2015 was against Menendez and a Democrat donor, a doctor in Florida, Solomon Melgan. They were charged with conspiracy, bribery, other things like that. Federal prosecutors ultimately were not able to get these charges through against the two of them. Menendez and a Florida eye doctor, Solomon Melgan, were indicted in 2015 for an alleged arrangement

under which the doctor provided flights on a private jet, lavish vacations, in exchange for the senator's help with government contracts and other public favors. And of course, he was padding his government contracts. That was the allegation. Menendez's lawyers argued that the two men were simply good friends. The inquiry ended in a mistrial in 2017 after the jury failed to reach a verdict. Melgan was convicted in 2017 of Medicare fraud and received clemency from President Trump in 2021 just before he left office.

Isn't that nice? You know, Trump didn't give any pardons to Julian Assange, didn't give any pardons to um julian assange didn't give any pardons to ross ulbrich or to marty gottesfeld or schaefer cox or to john kiryaku who served his time he just wanted to have his um his record cleared no none of these political dissidents or even in the case of John Kiriakou. He was a whistleblower who went to jail because he exposed the criminal actions of Gina Haspel, who Trump put at the head of the CIA, who ran the torture program and the cover-up for the program, which created the lies that took us to the Iraq War. So Trump promoted her, refused to pardon for John Kiriakou, refused a pardon for Julian

Assange, but he pardoned this crooked doctor over fraud. Interesting, isn't it? Yeah, if you are involved in corruption and theft and white-collar crime like Jared Kushner's friends and so forth, well, yeah, you get a pardon from Trump. Maybe you could even buy a pardon from Trump because John Kiriakou said that he had a meeting with Giuliani hoping that Giuliani could present his case to Trump, and Giuliani gets up and excuses himself and goes to the restroom. And while he's gone, these other two guys say, it'll cost you a million dollars to get that part. And he said, I'm not paying you a million dollars if I even had it. He said, the only reason I want to get this is because if I get this, if I don't have this removed, I can't get my retirement benefits. But the retirement benefits

were only 700 or $800,000. And so he says, I'm going to pay you a million dollars to get retirement benefits of $700,000, $800,000, but I wouldn't pay you anyway. He was a man of integrity. That's why he went to jail to expose the crimes of the CIA, because he has integrity. Anyway, isn't this interesting? The corruption that we have. And now they're coming back with different people. It appears to be a pattern by this New Jersey Senator. Doesn't it?

Two people familiar with the investigation. Uh, one is directly connected to the investigation. The other is a New Jersey lawyer. Who's been told about the case. Both of them said that the broad outlines of the new inquiry are similar to the 2017 case. Both of them said that the new investigation involved, however, an entirely different group of people, but the same M.O. The Democrat senator is no stranger to be investigated by federal authorities either nearly a decade ago.

Breitbart News' Matthew Boyle, who then worked for the Daily Caller, broke a story that Menendez solicited underage prostitutes in the Dominican Republic. The Department of Justice found evidence that corroborated the allegations against Menendez years later. They said they presented with specific corroborated the allegations against Menendez years later. They said they presented with specific corroborated allegations that defendants Menendez and Melgan, this is the same doctor, the eye doctor that was doing the stuff.

So the two of them had sex with underage prostitutes in the Dominican Republic. The government responsibly and dutifully investigated those allegations, but they didn't do anything about it. And even because he was convicted of this. So Trump still gave him a pardon. Isn't that interesting? I thought Trump was there to get rid of the pedophile networks and the sex trafficking and all that stuff, wasn't he? No, no, he pardons the guys that do it. And he would have pardoned the senator, I guarantee you,sey graham hadn't pulled his butt out of the fire menendez has been the senate

new jersey senator since he was appointed appointed in 2005 he got appointed and then as an incumbent he gets reelected he. He's up for reelection in 2024. And so now another Democrat Department of Justice is actually investigating this guy. After sending out 240,000 ballots that were unverified in Pennsylvania, now the person that has been the Secretary of State, Lay Chapman, who is the acting Secretary of State. She's been put in place by the Democrat governor to oversee the elections.

That's one of the most important things that the Secretary of State does. This is one of the reasons why many people on the left are saying, well, you know, there's this vast right-wing conspiracy where they're going to get secretaries of state elected at the state level because that oversees the election. Acting Secretary of State Lay Chapman demanding to know why 240,000 unverified ballots had been mailed out, which, according to the law, must be set aside and not counted unless the voter produces ID. Chapman revealed that there will likely be delays posting the results after the midterm elections.

It's going to be a mess. It really is. Yet again. I say, you know, they mailed out these ballots. That's why I call it the mail-out election. It's not even a mail-in election. The problem is they're mailing these ballots out to people. And under their law in Pennsylvania, they have to mail out the ballot if anybody asks for it.

They're just, and then they have to accept it back. And they don't bother to verify it until they, presumably, until they count it. And at that point, you have to have an ID. You don't have to have any valid ID or whatever to get a ballot sent to you, but they have to have that before they verify it. And so she's sending it out to people who haven't shown that they are legitimate voters. But again, all the mass mailing out of ballots, that was all in response and because of President Trump's lockdown. This is a Trump precedent that was established and is still wreaking havoc with our elections.

Why isn't it stopped? As a matter of fact, that's what I said on January the 6th when I began the show. I said, okay, so they just whined and raised money and did nothing even to contest and the state legislatures, the result for Trump. Trump raised a lot of money. Alex and Roger raised a lot of money with Stop the Steal stuff. But they never did anything, never did anything but whine and raise money. And I said, and for two months, you haven't fixed anything in Georgia, even though the Senate was in the balance. And so on that Tuesday, January the 5th, they had the election under the new Trump rules of mail it in. And of course it all went to the Democrats. And then that day,

that day, Wednesday was January the 6th. Oh yeah. We're going to show up and intimidate them into not counting the ballots. What? What a bunch of idiots. Anyway, delay isn't counting.

Doesn't mean that there's anything nefarious happening, says the Democrat Secretary of State. Oh, really? So there have been, according to Chapman, over 1.2 million mail-in ballots have been requested. And 43% of them have been returned. And so that's 556,000. So if 40% of those are unverified ballots, that means that 25% of the mail-in ballots were unverified that have come back. So I said, you know, this debate

and what happened with Fetterman, it may be a moot point because so many of the ballots have come in and because there is still so much garbage that's happening with all this vote-by-mail stuff. Will the mail-in ballots strike again in Pennsylvania midterm? This is an article from the New American. They say, not only can counties register voters without verification of identity? But they must send a mail-in ballot to any person who requests one, even if that individual provides invalid identification.

So, you know, when we look at this, and we look at what happened in Georgia, for example, in Texas. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with Live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials

and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee greg abbott who had restrictions on all kinds of things that you could do right at the time that we had the election in texas back in 2020 oh well i can't go to a restaurant without having a mask. All these different prohibitions about places that you could not go without wearing a mask. But he put in an exception to voting. So he had two exceptions. You could go to church and you could vote.

And he knew what was going to happen if they did a complete mail-in election, even in Texas, the Democrats would have stolen it. Everybody knew. So why didn't they fix it in Georgia? Well, why haven't they fixed it yet? Well, in Pennsylvania, it's still being run by Democrats. And so this acting Secretary of State, as a new American says, election integrity is not her strong point.

As a matter of fact, if you just go back and look at her career, this person that was appointed by Democrat Governor Tom Wolf, he would be hard-pressed to find a less suitable candidate to oversee the Pennsylvania elections, says the new American. Prior to that appointment, she had served as the executive director of Deliver My Vote, a left-leaning political advocacy group that promotes at-home voting and harvesting ballots, that type of thing, in collaboration with other left-leaning nonprofits, such as Engage Michigan, Progress Now, the Center for Voter Information, and the Voter Participation Center, according to Influence Watch. She has also worked for other leftist organizations, including Let America Vote.

She has repeatedly equated voter identification laws with Jim Crow racism. See, if you ask somebody for an ID, that's racism. So just, if you're Secretary of State, just tell everybody that no IDs can be requested if somebody's cashing a check or paying for their groceries with a check. That's racist if you ask for a picture ID. It's racist if the TSA is doing that to everybody, right? Why is it just voting? And why is that right?

Well, it's not. She endorsed the involuntary registration of persons eligible to vote who have not chosen to register voluntarily. You understand that? Not only are they sending out ballots to people who don't have ID or have invalid ID, but they're also registering people who have chosen not to register. What will they do with that? I have identified somebody that hasn't registered. I'm going to register them and then I will vote for them. That's exactly

what they're going to do. So in Nevada and in Arizona and a couple of different counties, they have people there are counting the mail-in ballots by hand. Volunteers in Nevada's Nye County started counting mail-in ballots Wednesday and worked through about 900 of the nearly 2,000 votes that have already been cast. There are about 33,000 voters who are registered in the rural county in Nevada. So that's about 6% of all registered voters that have already cast their votes as mail-in. Normally, machines count all the ballots on election day, and hand counts are used afterwards in some cases to double-check the machines. But Nye County commissioners changed the method of voting after complaints about the accuracy of the voting machines during the 2020 election.

Both Nye County, Nevada and Cochise County, Arizona will still use voting machines, but will compare those results with the hand-counted results. This is an example of local officials saying, we're going to take care of this. We know how to take care of it. Yeah, we got the voting machines here. Fine. But we're still going to verify that.

Trust and verify, as they say. Well, you know, Joe Biden, Joe Biden is, believes that John Fetterman is, quote, impressive and incredibly bright. Just to remind you of this debate, though. As lieutenant governor, you're running for a seat that could decide the balance of power in Washington. What qualifies you to be a U.S. senator? You have 60 seconds. Hi. Good night, everybody. I don't know why you say goodbye.

I say hello. Hi. Good night, everybody. Is that a hello? Goodbye. I don't know why you say goodbye. I say hello. Yeah.

Hello. Yeah, tell them that's how that works. And so you have both the White House press secretary, Corrine Jean-Pierre, said during a briefing, President Biden is fully supportive of Fetterman's campaign. She said the president has found him to be impressive, incredibly bright, and a talented person who is just as capable, as always,

to carry out the duties of his office. And she then referred to the fact that Biden and Fetterman had had personal conversations. Wouldn't you want to be a fly on the wall to hear that conversation between Biden and Fetterman? I can't imagine what they discussed or how they kept the conversation going. It had to be one non sequitur after the other. The race in Georgia is starting to move very rapidly after the October

surprise and the typical dirty tricks of a smear and things that you see from the Democrats. Herschel Walker, um, who, again, I'm not a big fan. I'm not,

I'm not in Herschel Walker's court court. I'm not on his team. Uh, but, uh, still, I'm definitely not on Warnick's team. Warnick's is a very dangerous individual.

Um, anyway, dangerous individual. Anyway, Herschel Walker has now widened his lead to five points over Warnick. And Stacey Abrams is down by 10, seven points on one poll and down by 10 points on another poll in the race for governor. And so as a result, they have released the Kraken. They have released Gloria Allred against Herschel Walker. How many times are they going to play that card? And we've seen them do that over and over again.

Did it with Roy Moore, brought out Gloria Allred. I mean, I've talked about that extensively. She is a real piece of work there. But this is his widest lead yet, Herschel Walker's, against his opponent, the sitting senator, Raphael Warnock, who is a pastor at the Ebenezer Scrooge Baptist Church. And that's our name for it because they are focused on evicting people i mean what's the purpose of a church having an apartment building uh if um well the purpose of this church is simply

money obviously i mean you would think that if a church is going to get in the apartment building business that they're doing it to help people who are down on their luck, but not in this particular case. They're evicting people for petty amounts, $28 and stuff that they owe. But it's not just the tenants that Warnick hates. He really hates white people. No matter what happens next month, more than a third of the nation that would go along with this is reason to be afraid. America needs to repent for its worship of whiteness on full display. Yeah, his racism is on full display, isn't it? I got a couple of comments here.

Thank you, Jacqueline Hogan. Thank you for the tip on rockfin she says jersey is a cesspit of corruption from dark to light indeed yeah that is absolutely true yeah it is uh you look at what they do to legitimate gun owners like we talked about a few days ago um and just so much stuff but it is really a cesspool of of corruption so they're pretty well represented by that senator. A. Rem, thank you very much for that tip. I appreciate that.

And G. Moe as well. Thank you very much for all that. There's an article from Brian Shulhavi. He's not buying the Republican Party big difference. Oh, this is the most important election we have ever had type of thing. He says, the myth that the two-party Democrat versus Republican choices bring different results through elections. He says, and it goes back to where we were the last election.

When I was criticizing Trump for what he did, he was, well, you know, you want Biden to run the country? And take a look at what has happened with Biden. I mean, he has attacked, there is a difference with energy policy for sure. But on the rest of the stuff, especially on the vaccines, that's what everybody was talking about. They said, well, you better hope that Trump gets in because Biden is going to mandate the vaccines. I said, well, that might be just what we need to wake people up to what this scam is. And I said, Trump is all for coercing people.

As a matter of fact, he even endorsed in the spring of 2019 vaccine mandates for people, for kids to go to school, MMR vaccines. I said, he is going to do everything he can to incentivize it. And a lot of people who normally would not take it if it is going to do everything he can to incentivize it. And a lot of people who normally would not take it if it was going to be coming from Biden would take it if Trump endorsed it. But Brian says, well, this notion that the people of the United States choose their leaders who then determine public policy as a representative of their constituents is a myth. The result of a population that's controlled by propaganda and the control of

the flow of information by just a handful of entities is the truth. And, um, they prove things by appealing to authority. That's the way we see this happening. He says, those who make the ultimate decisions at the top are usually not politicians at all but are the rich and powerful in the private sector who control the flow of money through

the banks and control the choices that we have now and what we spend our money, what they allow to filter down to us. He said I put usually in that last sentence because in 2016, the nation elected a corporate Wall Street billionaire who had no previous political experience as president of the United States, Trump. He was clearly not someone who existed in the top tier of decision makers, but someone on a lower rung who could be leveraged and controlled to accomplish globalist plans. And that's exactly what happened. So he says for the system, the system of perceived democracy to work, there must be a two-party system and only two parties. And these two parties have to have a perceived opposition to each other on certain hot-button issues.

That's exactly the way this works. That's why I say they will never include a third party in the debate, and they will never include certain questions in the debate, questions like, well, what happened with this lockdown? What are you going to do to get rid of the executive order? What are you going to do to stop and to make sure to put a stake in the heart of this idea that we should ever have public health dictatorship and mandates? What are you going to do about it?

No, they'll never talk about that. There's always certain things that they will not talk about that are the key issues. Because the one thing the globalists who actually run this country fear the most is a unified public where the masses wake up and discover that the emperor has no clothes, and instead of half the country fighting the other half, they join together and fight the true enemies of the people, the Wall Street billionaires and bankers. He says, I used to be part of the masses,

controlled by the propaganda, but I started waking up shortly after the year 2000, when I was in my 40s, he said, and I started running my own business in the U.S. and finding out that the U.S. government was my biggest enemy. I had the advantage of growing up and hearing that at the dinner table every night. The biggest problem for a small company to be able to survive is the government itself,

the types of things that they pull with regulations and taxes and the rest of this stuff. He says, what amazes me about this current generation is that they have all observed election fraud in the past six years, yet most of them still believe in their particular political party. How about that? You know, again, if we go back and where we started with this whole thing, you've got Bob Menendez under federal indictment again, supported by Lindsey Graham the last time, and his partner in crime, pardoned by President Trump.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie It is a uni party, if ever there was such a thing. We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Okay, and we've got an issue here with the deck, but I want to come in with a clip from R.K. Jr.'s documentary about Dark Winter.

Listen to this short clip. There was a simulation called Dark Winter that didn't come out very well. During June 22nd and 23rd, 2001, less than three months before the 9-11 attacks, the Pentagon launched a war game codename Operation Dark Winter at Andrews Air Force Base that emphasized the military's earnest commitment to bioweapons vaccines. Robert Cadillac was the lead organizer of this pandemic simulation. censorship, mandatory masking, lockdowns, and forced vaccination, and expanded police powers as the only rational response to the pandemic. You know, I like, as I said, his book about Fauci.

We look at Chapter 12, and he talks about the germ games and the rest of the stuff. And RFK Jr. understands that it all goes back to dark winter now he's not going to tell you the other part of it which is how dark winter was tied to 9-11 right two months before 9-11 and then you had the dark winter simulation that you just heard there where they simulated the lockdowns and all the rules and everything that we just experienced you know under trump they did that with the first simulation. Everybody wants to talk about event 201, but even though that looked exactly, you know, it was exactly like what happened.

So was the one that they did in 2001. They just had a different, uh, disease at the center of it, right? That was a supposedly a smallpox bioweapon attack, but all the responses were the same, regardless of whatever the MacGuffin was. You know, well, this simulation is going to be different. You know, the one we did last year, that was about smallpox. This time we're going to do one about Ebola or whatever. And so they did that on an annual basis. But the first one, in case you want to understand what this is all about,

as they're rolling out and bringing us into the 21st century, how are we going to get people locked into this UN Agenda 21, into these smart cities, the UN 2030 agenda that eventually became the Great Reset? How are we going to do this? Well, they rehearsed it for 20 years. And so they had two months before 9-11, they did the dark winter. One week after, they had the anthrax attack, and two months later, they had the legislation

that was model legislation sent out to all the states for them to enact regulations to make what happened in 2020 and since, to make that possible. So really, this pandemic fraud that Trump presided over was the second shoe to drop from 9-11. How appropriate that the guy who was in New York, who knew that 9-11 was a fraud from the very beginning and called it. All those buildings don't just fall down. Get this guy on the line. Let's have a talk with him. And, of course, his pal, Rudy Giuliani, 9-11 Rudy,

who sent a lot of people to their deaths, ironically, because they weren't wearing masks, and he sent them in to quickly clean everything up before the evidence was sorted through, sent them in without masks. So these two guys, you know, doing the other shoe to drop after the 9-11 thing. But yeah, RFK Jr. understands that. He understands the connection to the intelligence agencies. He talks in that book about Fauci.

He talks about Fauci's connections to the CIA and all these other people who are a big part of all of this it's one of the reasons i think why he has um uh paid twice as much as he should be paid because he's got two different uh things going on he's a he's an intelligence agent as well as head of a department under nih but he makes more than the department head. He makes more than the head of the NIH, and he makes more than the head of HHS, which NIH is under that. So he's two levels down from HHS, and he makes more than anybody else there. He makes more than he's legally allowed to make.

So he's going to have another position there, double dipping, I guess. But there's some new studies that have come out. This article from the Daily Skeptic points out that mRNA vaccines injure the heart of all vaccine recipients. All vaccine recipients have elevated troponin levels. That's what they look for to see if you've had a heart attack, right? They look for that substance in your bloodstream. If that's there, you've had heart damage. And they found that in these studies that everybody who got an mRNA jab

has elevated troponin levels in their blood, which indicates their heart has been injured. Furthermore, they found in a couple of different, several different studies, as a matter of fact, more than two, one of them found 2.8% of the people showing elevated levels. Another one showed 3.7% of people showing elevated levels of myocarditis i'm sorry not elevated levels all of them show elevated levels of troponin 2.8 percent myocarditis in one study 3.7 percent myocarditis so to restate this and to be clear about it all vaccine recipients had indications of heart injury, elevated troponin levels. And the two studies, they also show that between 2.8% in one study and 3.7% of people in another study also had myocarditis.

The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths where they are acknowledged, if they even acknowledge it, what they'll say is, well, that was caused by the virus. And it was a post-COVID condition. Or maybe it was due to long COVID. They've invented a lot of different things. Well, maybe it's the variant or whatever. No, it's the vaccine. And that's what these studies are about. Studies in multiple countries showing this.

Expert group HEART, which stands for Health Advisory and Recovery Team, has pointed to Australia as a control group on this question. HEART notes that even though Australia had not had significant COVID, only 30,000 reported infections and 910 reported deaths, people who died with a PCR test. Prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-COVID deaths beginning in June 2021. Hart notes that Australia did not have prior COVID as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021.

Instead, the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something that is in common with Australia, Europe, and the USA. Oh, that would be the Trump shots. So what they're saying here is that because dictator Dan did such a good job of locking everybody down, we now have a control group where they can't say, well, this massive increase was due to post-COVID because they didn't have a massive identification of a COVID population because a dictator dictates in lockdowns.

Isn't it funny how God works? I'm sorry for the people of Australia who had to suffer through all this stuff stuff and it was outrageous what we were seeing happening uh but because they locked everybody down and and that type of thing and you know they weren't uh uh identifying people with pcr tests and that type of thing now we have a control group which says well it's it's not post covet it not long COVID. You got way more excess deaths. And so now, you know, that suffering that they went through has been used to expose this lie. It was the Trump shots. Also in New Zealand, an economist there, John Gibson, found a temporal association, whether it's time-related, between boosters and excess deaths.

He estimated 16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses. He noted that the age distribution of the deaths corroborated the hypothesis. He said the age groups most likely to use the boosters show large rises in excess mortality after the boosters are rolled out. So he sees two things. He sees a time correlation. The boosters, now all of a sudden we've got a rise in deaths. And not only that, but the rise in deaths are concentrated amongst the people

who they've identified and pushed the boosters to the most, the elderly or whatever. In Japan, Guy Jin reports that Professor Seiji Kajima of Nagoya University found the same correlation during booster rollout January to March. And in Israel, yet another one. A study in Nature magazine observed a similar trend for 16 to 39-year-olds with cardiac arrest emergency calls rising and falling with the first and second doses, and then rising and falling again after doses for recovered individuals. Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Australia. Dr. Eval Shahar looked at the Israeli deaths data for all ages

and estimated a, quote, plausible range of the booster fatality rate in Israel in August of 2021 of 8 to 17 deaths per 100,000 vaccines. Isn't that interesting? Coming up with essentially the same number that this data analysis in New Zealand, he estimated 16 excess deaths per 100,000 people. In this Israeli study, they said, well, 8 to 17 deaths per 100,000 people. In the Netherlands, vaccinologist Dr. Theo Sketters estimated a booster fatality rate in the over 60s as high as 125 per 100,000 vaccines. So what he's saying is that the people who are over the age of 60, it went up almost a factor of 10.

As to the cause, Drs. Michael Palmer and Dr. Shukrit Bhakti have set out what they deem to be irrefutable proof of causality. That's what they said. That mRNA vaccines are causing vascular and organ damage. From studies and autopsy evidence, the medical experts show four different things. First, mRNA vaccines do not stay at the injection site. We've seen this over and over again.

Remember, there was initially a study out of Japan, and you had a guy in Canada who noticed it and reported it, and they booted him out of his medical practice for reporting that. But now it's been widely reported many different places. So it immediately is distributed throughout the body. It travels throughout the body and accumulates in various organs. Number two, mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the spike protein in many organs. Number two, mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the spike protein in many organs. Number three, vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein

induces autoimmune-like inflation. And number four, vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes a deadly outcome. So with all of that, you have it travels. It travels across the body. It accumulates and stays and remains in the organs. The documented cases of autoimmune inflammation and other things are well documented. But not only that, but it lasts so long that they know that it's continually reprogramming your body because the spike proteins would have disappeared by that time.

In a recent case record in the magazine Vaccines, trade publication. An autopsy conducted on a 76-year-old man who died three weeks after receiving his third vaccination confirms the role of the vaccine. It found the presence of spike protein, but not the nucleocapsid protein in the deceased man's brain and heart, proving that the vaccine, which unlike the virus, only produces the spike protein, was the cause of the deadly inflammation.

From their report, quoting from their report, they said, in the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lymphohistiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, in other words, this is not post-COVID side effects, immunohistochemistry for SARS antigens, spike and nucleocapsid proteins was performed. And surprisingly, only spike protein, but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart,

particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than viral infection. A recent meta-analysis claimed to find that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven-fold higher in persons who were infected than in those who received the vaccine. This is counter to this. However, writes this article from Daily Skeptic, they say, however, critics have pointed out the numerous flaws in the meta-analysis and highlighted that it is at odds with a major Nordic study of 23 million people that found the risk of hospitalization post-vaccination

in 16- to 24-year-old males was up to 28 times higher than the risk was for people who had been identified as having COVID. We should also note that the vaccination does not prevent COVID infection. So, if the vaccination does not prevent it, and everybody admits that now, and we've seen it over and over again with the professions of people who say that they were vaccinated multiple times, you know, like Fauci and Walensky and all them. Oh, yeah. I don't three, four, whatever, six, 10. I don't know what it is, but I still got it.

And I got it again and again and again. So they themselves are telling you that it's not going to prevent you from getting it, which has always been the purpose of a vaccination. But since it doesn't, if their argument is going to be that the people who are vaccinated are better off than the people who didn't get vaccinated. Well, the problem is, is that this, the vaccine, getting the vaccine doesn't keep you from getting it, right? And so the comparison between vaccination risk and infection risk

is not really all that valid when you're looking at it. But again, going back to myocarditis, you know, 100 100 of the people had elevated troponin levels but you had 2.8 and 3.7 two different studies showing that that was a percentage of people who got myocarditis a swiss study now confirms results from a study in Thailand. Both of these studies found cardiovascular adverse effects in around a third of teenagers, 29%, following Pfizer vaccination. And so the rates were highest, by the way, amongst women. Crucially, the study found elevated troponin levels indicating heart injury across all vaccinated people. These injuries are not necessarily short and they're not over with

quickly. Studies have shown that the spike protein is still being found in the blood of many vaccinated people four months after vaccination, suggesting it is still being produced in some way. I said that from the very beginning. I had a question about that. I said, okay, so what's going to stop this process? You know, they put something into your blood that's going to reprogram, and it's going to operate like a virus itself. It's going to reprogram the cell to destroy itself, producing the spike itself. And then it's going to continue that reprogramming. I said, what stops that process?

Well, it looks like it doesn't get stopped, apparently. So raised troponin levels across the board are not rare events, as is being claimed by medical authorities and in the media, and they are alarmingly common. It's happening everywhere. It is not rare. It's happening everywhere. It is not rare. It's ubiquitous. Now, I find this interesting.

I've criticized Rand Paul many times because he has narrowly focused on Fauci and on Wuhan. He said, you need to broaden this stuff out. Well, there's some good news here. He is broadening this out a little bit. He's now demanding answers over a vaccine company, PR firms, embedded staff within the CDC to promote vaccines. Who knows?

You know, we might actually figure out, if we pursue this line of investigation, he might figure out or he might expose, because I imagine he knows, that the CDC is one of the biggest sellers of vaccines, that the CDC makes a great deal of money selling vaccines. I think they are the biggest seller of vaccines. This is one of the reasons why, and we talked about this for years, talking about their flu shot scam and said, well, the reason they're pushing the flu shot so heavily is because they make so much money doing it. And so is it a surprise that if they're making so much money pushing these vaccines, that they would bring a vaccine company PR firm into the CDC to help do it?

Not really surprised, but I'm glad that he is taking a look at this. Rand Paul said on September 28, 2020, the CDC awarded a federal contract award to Weber Shanwick to conduct marketing consulting services for the NCIRD. That organization is responsible for providing management and support services to the ACIP, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Well, you know, for a start, you've just got too many different bureaucracies, don't we? And so Paul went on to say that the firm invented some 10 on-site health communication staffers, seven health communication specialists, two health research specialists, and one social media specialist as part of the deal. So you got 17, 19, you got 20 different people coming in to push this PR.

It cost $52 million to get these 20 people to come in and push this stuff. So, yeah. Paul notes that the target audience research was carried out, including promoting vaccines, communicating the risks, and recommending actions for outbreaks. In addition to generating story ideas, distributing articles, conducting outreach to news and media and entertainment organizations. You know, the kind of stuff that you saw all these influencers

being paid extra money by youtube for talking about how wonderful the vaccine is many of them these young influencers would have fauci on and then that interview would be promoted and pushed by youtube and you still have this kind of nonsense going on this is is a video from USA Today. Take a look at this video. This is about COVID fashion. Yeah. So here we are at a fashion show,

and these are a bunch of the vaccine syringe caps. And this woman, this is in a foreign country, she was a medical administrative assistant during COVID-19 pandemic. She said it inspired her to do something with all this extra plastic that was there. USA Today identifies her as a trash designer. Yeah, definitely. So she said, I saw this plastic and I asked my colleagues to save the vaccine caps from the trash. So now she is putting all this stuff together and making hideous, disgusting looking,

this is like some kind of coronavirus thing where they got all this stuff stuck in there. She puts a, sticks the caps onto something like a bunch of coronavirus shots and then puts sequins on the end of it. So this is something else that she has made. Yeah, what this reminds me of is the lunacy and the poor taste of the hunger games isn't it isn't this like hunger game fashions i've

seen a great deal of plastic in the trash and i thought oh i could do something with that so isn't this wonderful she does something that complies with both the climate MacGuffin and the pandemic MacGuffin. She takes the pandemic trash and she doesn't want that to get into the environment. So she turns it into hideous fashion. Isn't that nice? And so it goes on. And so they find somebody who identify as a fashion fan. And she, this fashion fan, this is what this lady does look at that now isn't that the hunger game she's got like a corona crown of uh vials and things stuck in her head unbelievable what a bunch of dumbed down garbage now all of that is garbage she's a trash designer they've trashed our society for sure uh so anyway uh yeah that's's how they do the outreach to news,

to entertainment, to social media. Paul says, Weber embedded staff within the CDC to promote the vaccines to provide communication services related to all this, while simultaneously representing the interests of Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna, two pharmaceutical companies actively seeking federal approval of their respective vaccines.

Well, yeah, that's how it works. Who knows? Maybe we can focus on what the real bioweapon is, which is the vaccine. Stay with us. We'll be right back and talk about what these climate idiots, stuff even more idiotic, or certainly as idiotic idiots, stuff even more idiotic or certainly as idiotic, but maybe even more idiotic than that fashion show using vaccination syringe caps.

We'll be right back. Decoding the mainstream propaganda it's the david knight show all right let's take a look at the attacks on art and culture because that's what these marxists are about they're about attacking everything in our society. This group is called Just Stop Oil, and I'm sure you've seen some of these attacks already. They began with an attack on a Van Gogh painting. I think they tried to cut the ear off or something. No, Van Gogh did that himself. And then they went to a wax figurine of Prince Charles, now King Charles. Were they not able to tell him from the wax puppet that they had there?

Did they not know that this real dummy is actually on their side? King Charles is. But the organization is called Just Stop Oil. And I don't know why they hate oil paintings so much. I mean, they're... No, it's the oil, of course, but they don't want it taken out of the ground. Without that oil, you wouldn't have...

Here's one where they were going after a Monet painting. They're throwing food and stuff like that on there, and they're posing for their pictures and reciting their manifesto about how everybody is going to starve. People are freezing and people are dying. Yeah, because of people like you who are taking away our fuel. We are in a climate catastrophe. We are because of these idiots.

And all you were afraid of is tomato soup. All they're afraid of is carbon dioxide. Are you kidding me? And mashed potatoes on a painting. Tomato soup and mashed potatoes on a painting are far worse than CO2. They're saying we won't be able to feed our families in 2050. Isn't that interesting? You know, we're talking about 30 years out. How do they know that? Does it take mashed potatoes on a painting to wake you up? The painting is not going to be worth anything if we have to fight over food. This is the same kind of lunatic Malthusianism that we had with Paul Ehrlich at the very beginning of all this.

I've seen this my entire life. In 1971, all this stuff, yeah, we're all going to be starving. Everybody's going to be starving in 10 years. Now they're saying everybody, now here we are 50 years later, everybody's going to be starving in another 30 years. It was going to be a global winter coming up in 10 years. And then when 10 years happened, they completely reversed gears and it was going to be global warming. But it was all our fault. We had too many people. That's why we're going to be starving.

So we had to get rid of the people. Now we got to get rid of the oil. So who's behind all of this stuff? As a matter of fact, the latest one that they did is this one right here. This is the girl with the pearl earring painting. And this guy's got his bald head and looks like John Malkovich or something. His friend is pouring tomato soup or something on him.

I don't know what it's that about. And he's rubbing his head up against the painting. And they got their Just Stop Oil t-shirts. Yeah, I hate it when you environmentalists do that. You're constantly destroying beautiful, priceless things. You're destroying our infrastructure. You're destroying our lives. You're destroying everything in our society.

And you haven't a clue as to what you're doing. You bought into these lies for the last 50 years. You don't have the intelligence to understand how many times their predictions have failed. And so here's the security guard. He says, I'm going to need some backup here. I've got two wackos. I'm only one guy. I can only handle one of these guys with tomato paste on his head.

It's the future of our children. It's the future of our children. Yeah, yeah. Do they have any children at all? I don't think they have any children. They don't want children. Why are they concerned about the future of our children? They don't want us to have food either because, you know, food uses nitrogen or something.

So we've got to shut that down. They don't want us to have food, but then they complain about starvation. They don't want to hurt the kids, but then they complain about starvation. They don't want to hurt the kids, but then they say don't have kids and so forth. Well, anyway. So who's bankrolling this? Who is behind all this? There's a good story on RT

talking about who is ultimately behind it. Take a look at their finances. Well, first of all, it's hard to find out who's giving money to these people because it's being done through Ethereum. It's almost completely opaque, but you're not going to hear any of the governments actually doing an investigation into them, are you?

Oh, no, they won't be investigated by Interpol or by the FBI or by the local police. No, they'll have nothing to say about that. And even though it's being done through cryptocurrency, they're not going to use those people to complain about how opaque the flow of money is through cryptocurrency. Instead, as RT is pointing out, their hypocr hypocrisy they said by some calculations they're getting their money through most of it apparently through ethereum donations they said by some calculations every single transaction using cryptocurrency creates 34 kilograms of co2 oh tremble the plants love that stuff by the way anyway, roughly the same amount of energy

the average U.S. household burns through in two and a half days. Ethereum, that's for every transaction, is equivalent to a U.S. household running for two and a half days. Ethereum, therefore, consumes more energy annually in total than the entire country of Denmark. In September, it announced changes that it claims will reduce its carbon emissions by over 99%, although crypto experts consulted by leading tech magazine The Verge strongly doubt whether or not this will actually be achieved. At the very least, Just Stop oil depends on donations made in secret via a cryptocurrency with a huge carbon footprint. Now let's stop there and think about what they just said. This is going to be the argument, by the way, for banning crypto. I said that from

the very beginning. When you look at Biden's, every government agency needs to get on this. And every government agency, he said a little bit more than six months ago, it was back in March, and he wanted their reports by September. He got those reports. We haven't seen what they're doing with them yet. But he broke them down into essentially four different areas. The first one he gave to things like the Treasury Department and said, I want you to redesign our entire financial system for the CBDC.

We want a complete redesign of the financial system. The next thing was to some other groups he gave the technical issues, do the programming and that type of stuff and the apps. A third group was law enforcement. How are we going to enforce this? So you've got the redesign. You've got the actual computer design. You know, the redesign of the financial system, the design of the software components, and then the law enforcement to force people to it. And the fourth component was to look at the environmental impacts of this.

That's how they're going to sell it. They're going to say, well, each of these transactions from Ethereum is equivalent to two and a half days of all the electricity that the average US household uses for two and a half days, each transaction. So we can't afford to have that. And certainly that's going to be an issue even apart from their concerns about CO2 because they're restricting our energy. Now, they may get that technical problem solved, but they will use that as the selling point. So you have a redesign of the financial system, the design of the software, the law enforcement thugs who are going to make people do this. And then you've got the carrot on the side. We're going to save the planet because our CBDC isn't going to use the same kind

of energy as the CBDC, as the cryptocurrency. Why? Because a cryptocurrency, they have to have proof of work. Whereas the other one is, it's just going to be like a fiat currency. You will trust us because we're the authorities. So you just trust us on this thing. We're not going to prove anything. We're not going to mine anything. We're not going to show that we did anything. You just trust us, which means that they can create as much of this as they want. It's going to be a fiat cryptocurrency. So the only publicly confirmed backer of Just Stop the Oil is the U.S.-based Climate Emergency Fund, which is led by an heir to the Getty fortune. An heir to the $5.4 billion Getty fortune.

That kind of puts in perspective what the guy at Hobby Lobby did. As a matter of fact i mean he had you know this is the gettys as rich as they are 5.4 billion dollars hobby lobby 13.7 billion and this is why he doesn't want to see this money passed on to his kids this heir to the getty fortune eileen getty i think she leans left um but uh eileen uh took the money that she inherited and she's using it to fund all these radical organizations like these idiots out here who's smearing stuff on paintings left right by the way um the word is that that uh at least that last painting was not injured because they had it behind glass. So the guy was smearing his bald head covered with tomato paste.

He was smearing that on some glass. They may have to put another frame on it, but he didn't harm the painting. Good news is they don't know what they're doing. They're totally ineffective at it. But they're being funded by this. And so it's caused some people to say, wait a minute, the Getty fortune was based on oil. That was an oil company. So maybe this is an attempt to discredit the environmentalists by having wackos like that. It's like, no, you're overthinking it.

It's simply that Eileen Getty wants to impress her liberal friends and the people that she went to the quote-unquote best colleges with. She's just like the typical white female liberal. She wants to impress her friends and show how she doesn't have anything to do with any of this stuff, and she totally rejects the money that she got from the oil fortune, and she's going to use it to attack oil, just like the white liberal females will attack their whiteness. No, she's just, to be accepted, She has to be self-loathing and that's the way that she's

going to operate this. She's just another spoiled heiress who wants to attack, um, you know, how she got to be spoiled and privileged in order to show that she rejects her privilege. Uh, Joe Pappas, thank you very much for the tip. He says, uh, do these no oil people really believe this or are they paid to make a scene? Who funds these idiots? Good point. That's what we're going to take a look at here. So they're getting a lot of the money from Eileen Getty. They're getting money that is sent to them behind the scenes with Ethereum, and you can't track that.

But going back to Eileen Getty, she in fact appears sincerely committed to using her enormous fortune, says RT, to undermine traditional energy industry. Many major environmental protest groups have benefited from her largesse, including the controversial Extinction Rebellion. Now, these are the people, the other idiots, who were laying down in the streets and blocking traffic all over the UK, that type of thing, Extinction Rebellion. That's one of their better known activities. Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion have something else in common besides Eileen Getty. They receive hundreds of thousands of

dollars from the same source. And there is one man at the center of that, Roger Hallam. The guy is truly deranged. He has apocalyptic views on climate, summed up in his rambling, impenetrable 12,200-word manifesto. Resembling the crazed excesses of a fever dream, he predicts that in the next 30 years, it's always 30 years out, right? I guess they learned the lesson from Paul Ehrlich, even though the people who are generating this propaganda learned the lesson and said, well, let's not make any predictions that are 10 years out.

Let's go at least 30, maybe 50 years out, and put this stuff out there, because then they really can't verify that. But this scam has been running for 50 years and we've got such a long audit trail. It's just amazing to me that there are people my age and loss of mind who actually believe this stuff, even though they have been looking at this stuff like I have for 50 years and seeing how all of these dire predictions have constantly failed. Anyway, resembling the crazed excesses of a fever dream, he predicts that the next 30 years,

weather will be destroyed. What does that mean to destroy weather? Leading to starvation and the collapse of society. But isn't that what they want? They want starvation. They want depopulation. They want society to collapse. What are they complaining about? Just sit back and enjoy the chaos and the nihilism, right? And also leading to war, violence, the slaughter of young men, the rape of young women on global scale is what he said. Dogs and cats living together. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Hallam wrote the manifesto while he was in prison because he breached bail conditions after he tried to shut down london's heathrow airport using civilian drones so they didn't want to punish him you know because he's a well-meaning environmentalist marxist uh so they you know bail and then he breached the conditions and then they put him in jail so then he writes this manifesto. The protest failed to stop a single plane, by the way. Even though he's flying these drones, he couldn't stop me in the planes.

It's just like these people trying to destroy the paintings, and they're rubbing their heads on a glass frame there that's there. So this episode, along with an action the next year and which beyond politics, yet another civil disobedience group founded by this same guy, Hallam, they burst into London offices of NGOs, including amnesty international and green peace. Cause green peace isn't radical enough. They poured paint all over the walls and floors.

Oh, that sound familiar? They demanded the organizations order their members to rise up against the government. And so even Extinction Rebellion distanced themselves from this guy. They have, the Extinction Rebellion, though, has another big backer, a billionaire hedge fund manager, Christopher Hohn, who has a 730 million euro stake in the airport.

So that might have had something to do with them backing away from this guy. that when you look at these people, Soros and his open society foundation funding some of this stuff, these other people funding some of this stuff, these hedge fund guys, like Christopher Hohn, like George Soros, profit from chaos. Well, they do. They mention the fact that with his quantum funds, he broke the Bank of England. He leveraged up against them on a currency issue

and made $1.8 billion in a single day. Soros did. The British evidently didn't like that. I think a lot of people said that's why they had the villain in one of these Daniel Craig Bond films being the quantum of solace. You know, the bad guy had an organization called Quantum. Was that a reference to George Soros? A lot of people thought that it was.

But nevertheless, look, it's always about chaos, isn't it? That's what Fauci and his Pharmakeia brothers were all about. Chaos. We've got to do it from the inside. We've got to do it with disruption. Chaos. And we do it iteratively. It's always about that. So as I tweeted out that latest one where these guys were rubbing their head on the painting of the girl with the pearl earrings. I put that out and I said, we have nothing to fear from man-made climate change hoax.

Quote, unquote, man-made. I said, but be very afraid of the useful idiots like this who are being used by the globalists. You know, these useful idiots. who are being used by the globalists, you know, these useful idiots. They're being used by the globalists to destroy not only culture, but energy, food, freedom, everything, in an attempt to satisfy their insatiable appetite for power. That's what this is all really about.

You know, these are just useful idiots. And you notice that these people that are there, you know, these two guys, at least they're not even youthful idiots. Uh, they're old enough. They should know better. Uh, Brad, Brian, thank you very much for the tip. He says, uh, funny episode today, David enjoyed it very much. I couldn't tell if the one guy was putting super glue or not. What kind of drugs are they giving these people uh is it from our savior trump yeah it's just amazing isn't it i mean how how do they what in the world are they thinking i mean it is so obvious that you got some of the people some of the environmentalists are saying i think this is a setup they're trying to make us look bad no i mean that really is i think a billionaire who's

trying to virtue signal to her friends that she rejects her privilege. In the midst of all this, you have this article come out from CNN. The hunt for habitable planets may have just gotten far more narrow, says a new study. The hunt for planets that could harbor life may have just narrowed dramatically. And this is a common theme that you hear from these people. Even from the billionaires like Elon Musk. Remember, Elon Musk is one of the green crowd. That's how he's made his money.

The greening of all this stuff. And one of the things he's saying is, we've got to have a backup plan. Both he and Bezos, we've got to have a backup plan. We've got to be able to get off the planet. Um, I think that's for them personally, uh, but they keep telling us that it's about humanity. Got to get humanity out. Got to have a backup plan. And, uh, that's one of the reasons why you've got people like Greta.

There is no planet B. There's no plan B, right? There's no planet B. There's no other planet that we can go to. So that's the two things that are out there. But they're looking around. Can't we go to another habitable planet somewhere? Well, CNN says that scientists who are looking for that habitable planet,

they've long hoped and theorized that the most common type of star in our universe, called an M dwarf, could host nearby planets with atmospheres, potentially rich with carbon. What? Carbon? I saw this and it's like, carbon? Carbon is now a bit? Why, yes. Listen to what they say about carbon. They're potentially, they could be, to harbor life, they have to be rich with carbon. Perfect for the creation of life.

But without carbon-rich atmosphere, it is unlikely that a planet would be hospitable to living things. What? Did they just admit that we need to have CO2 and carbon and things like that for life? Why, yes, we are carbon-based life forms. And so it's why they have to eliminate carbon, why they have to eliminate carbon dioxide, why they have to eliminate nitrogen. They look at what the most, the next thing they're going to be saying is we've got to eliminate all water because, you know, the water is bad and it's going to destroy the planet. They take the most common things. You take a look at what they did with the pandemic. Whoa, we've got to be very worried because there's a respiratory flu-like disease. Flu's the most common thing you're going to find anywhere, the common cold.

We got something that's like the common cold. We're going to have to lock everybody down. We got carbon dioxide and carbon in the atmosphere. We got to shut that down. We got to get rid of all it. And if you generate any carbon, we're going to sequester it. We're going to pump it into the ground and we're going to store it in the ground at phenomenally expensive prices. For what?

I think the carbon sequestration schemes are the most absurd and ridiculous things of all of this stuff. We're going to have carbon taxes to pay for a global government. Right? But here's this thing saying, you know, we're looking for planets that we could live on, alternative planets. We got to look for planets that have lots of carbon in it. What they're trying to eliminate here. Carbon molecules are, after all, says CNN, considered to be the building blocks of life.

That's why they got to come after them and destroy them because they don't want to have life on Earth. Thank you, William Cockler. Appreciate the tip. Thank you very much. And B.O.H., our ARBO. Thank you very much. Appreciate that.

So we're at the situation now where things are starting to get interesting because in Germany, we've just had a dismant they're starting to dismantle a wind farm so they can make way for a coal mine now why would they do that because you can get a lot more energy from coal than you and a coal mine than you can from a windmill and a wind farm. So they got this wind farm, and they had a bright idea not too long ago. They got this big open area. They had a coal mine. Well, we don't want coal, but we got this open area,

so let's put up a wind farm. Now they're looking at it and looking at what the wind farm is capable of producing and saying, well, let's go back to the coal. A wind farm is being dismantled in Western Germany to make way for an expansion of an open-pit lignite coal mine. In a paradoxical situation, highlighting the current prioritization of energy security over clean energy in Europe's biggest economy. So it's already started. And the company there, it's an energy giant called RWE. RWE says that lignite or brown coal has been mined from the coal fields there

for over 100 years. Guess what? It works. You know, these other things may work, given time. But we're not going to throw away what works on something that hasn't been tested and proven. But they always want to do that, right? They want to throw away medicines that work against the common cold and flu.

For all these things that have now been proven to be fatal, but had not been proven to be effective at the time or safe. RWE also said at the end of September that three of its lignite-fired coal units that had previously been put on standby were going to be returning to the electricity market on schedule in October. So evidently, we're now starting to see the first signs of life, intelligent life, returning to Germany. And it's carbon-based in its return.

So the company is going to actually be expanding the lignite mine after a court ruled in their favor. You see, you have to go to court now in the West for permission to produce energy so that people don't starve and so that you don't shut down the entire society. Because also in Germany, because of this energy crunch, you have two of Germany's largest steel manufacturing plants are being forced to shut down because they don't have energy.

The world's second largest steel company said that it would later shut down a blast furnace at its Bremen site the end of October. So this steel giant is shutting down plants in Germany because they don't have the energy. So all of this is, people are starting to wake up there to some degree. Again, before the pipeline was destroyed, the Nord Stream pipelines were destroyed, you had protests by the political party AFD, which is getting huge gains because they're

not on board with this nonsense. They were rising politically against the existing German government, which was keeping the pipelines closed. And so that's one of the reasons why I think it was necessary for the U.S. government, NATO, to blow that up. And the U.K., you still have the Davos-led U.K. Conservative Party. Got to understand, they've become now a synonym, just like Trudeau, the U.K.

Conservatives. So again, you got Trudeau, he's got the liberal party in Canada, the conservative party in the UK, both of them Davos puppets. It doesn't matter what they say their political philosophy is. They work for Klaus Schwab and his agenda. And so the UK is flip-flopping back into the green religion, and he has now shut down. Fracking again. Liz Truss, in the short period of time that she was there, she tried to reverse some of the energy austerity policies, and I think that's one

of the reasons why the financial people and the globalists pushed her out so quickly. I've said that before. I really do believe that. Almost as quickly as Liz Truss was outed from office, so too was her now temporary order to resume gas shale fracking, a plan which included offering UK households 1,000 pounds each for allowing the practice in their neighborhoods. The WEF-sponsored Rishi Sunak reversed Truss's order, reinstating the fracking ban. He's looking very much like Biden, isn't he? Rishi Sunak.

The very first thing that Biden did, what? He shut down a massive pipeline. He shut down a massive pipeline. He shut down drilling and production. And most recently, he's blown up a couple of pipelines going into Europe. And I'm absolutely convinced that the U.S. government is behind it, even if they used somebody else to actually, you push the button. They took out 50 meters of a massive pipeline that was steel encased in concrete, 80 meters below the surface, and they blew up 50 meters of it. Don't tell me that anybody had that kind of technology except for the U.S. government.

It certainly wasn't technology that the Ukrainians had. Truss's reversal was set to increase North sea drilling. Oh yeah. Don't want to do that. You know, they've got this massive reserve of oil in the North. It can't do that. Just like Trump.

Sunak is going to go back and shut down the drilling. She had renewed a focus on accelerating even wind farms. Let's let's do everything. You know, we've got an energy shortage. Let's start the drilling. Let's start the fracking. Let's add more wind farms. Let's do everything. We've got an energy shortage. Let's start the drilling. Let's start the fracking. Let's add more wind farms.

And then capped the bill for the people, said we're going to incur costs because we're going to subsidize individual energy. All of that was reason to get rid of her. Because, again, they don't even want the subsidy of energy. I mean, one aspect of it that I thought was dangerous was it was very much like a stimulus check or universal basic income check

and the way that it might affect the populace, just giving everybody some kind of an energy bonus there. But it might not have been money that they would have seen. It might have just been money that would have gone directly so they didn't see their bills go up that much. But the same people were cutting off the energy. They're cutting off the energy because they want to impoverish people. So they didn't want that aspect of it either.

It is a full spectrum attack to create chaos and to, uh, shut down what we have. So as you look at Germany, uh, going in and, and, you know, after they shut down the coal mine, put up a wind farm, now they're taking the wind farm down and they're opening up the coal mine and they're going to expand the coal mine. They have a world's second largest steel company is having to shut down facilities because they can't get enough energy. That's not happening in China. I would imagine that China has the largest steel company. I'm just guessing at that. But China is also ramping up coal output. It's the UK, though, that's taking the lead because of the World Economic Forum leader, Sunak.

You know, Rishi is shutting down their energy. China's already prodigious coal output will be increased even further to brace for the coming winter without the slightest concern for what climate change activists think the global times. That's a communist party mouthpiece. They're the official,

uh, newspaper, the global times threw in a token claim about ramping up the volume of power generated from new energy sources. But Breitbart says in this article, but coal is the workhorse of Chinese energy. So the government is creating a system that is ready for the daily dispatch of coal output nationwide and a mechanism to monitor prices and inventories. As a matter of fact, when we had the back and forth with when Trump was there with North

Korea, they're putting embargoes on North Korea. And one of North Korea's biggest exports was coal and their biggest customer was China. And just like these sanctions and stuff against Russia, China said, no, no, bring it on. We don't care about that stuff. We'll buy it. And so they were taking all the coal that North Korea could do. As a matter of fact, they were shutting down Chinese coal mines because of this zero COVID nonsense, that power play by President Xi.

That was all that was about. Same type of power play that Mao did when he starved people with a great leap forward. They were starving people with everything, shutting people down, just to show his power, the raw exercise of his power. Fear me was really the message. People weren't afraid of COVID, but they did fear she. So they were shutting down their coal mines. They actually had to buy coal from Russia. So they'll buy coal from Russia, they'll buy coal from North Korea, they'll buy oil from Russia, that type of thing. When they bought the Russian coal, they bought massive amounts of it.

And because the economy operates under central planning, after they bought the coal from Russia, they realized they didn't have the railroad capacity to get it from Russia. Brilliant, isn't it? That's what happens when you have the government running your economy with their five-year plans. We can buy coal, and they buy it. They don't have any way to get it. So they're working on increasing their railroad capacity as well,

specifically to transport more coal. And under the Paris Climate Accord, if you recall, I've talked about this many times, both China and India, the two most heavily populated countries on earth, are allowed to continue to add unlimited numbers of coal plants, and they don't even have to be clean. No controls, no pollution controls on them whatsoever, and as many as they want. Well, we have to not only, and they can do that for another couple of decades before they cap, and then they have to start reducing, theoretically. And so the people who really believe this stuff are freaked out.

First of all, they don't like that many people. They're freaked out about the fact that there is a big population in India and a big population in China. And now that big population can burn as much of this stuff as they want. And these people who are true believers in this climate change hoax are saying, what's going on with this Paris Climate Accord? This is nothing other than a transfer of wealth from Europe and America to China and India. Yep.

You got it. That's all it is. That's all it is. So China has 350 coal power plants, and they're building more all the time. And they're building more oil refineries as well. That's the bottleneck in America, even more so than the pipelines and the drilling. The refineries are the issue. And China is building multi-billion dollar oil refineries one after the other.

How did, by the way, just as an aside, how did John D. Rockefeller get so wealthy? He wasn't pulling the oil out. He was refining it. You see, he bought his way out of being in the Civil War. He was up north, and he avoided the draft by getting the money together and paying somebody else to go in his place. So he bought his way out, and then he went up to the only place where they knew there was oil at the time, which was in Pennsylvania. The Union desperately needed oil because it was the replacement for turpentine, which was coming from the South, and they could no longer get it because of the Civil War.

So he saw a business opportunity, and he went up to Pennsylvania, the only known source of the stuff at the time, and he started buying up the refineries until he got a monopoly up there. That's how he became so wealthy. Then oil was later discovered in Texas. I was like, oh, no. And so he set up Standard Oil of Ohio, which is where they would transport the oil up again to set up the refineries. And so Rockefeller got rich off the refineries, not because he's pumping the oil out of the ground.

China is putting itself, they are kind of the Rockefeller of the energy industry. They understand that people are either going to starve or freeze to death, or the government is going to relent on some of this climate nonsense. It's going to run its course. And whoever can refine the oil is going to be the one controlling everything. China is setting itself up to be the John D. Rockefeller of energy by setting itself up to continually build more refineries

while Biden prohibits it. And the Republicans, for the most part, are not doing anything to stop all this stuff. Reuters reported on Wednesday that China increased its orders for Russia coal after the lockdowns, the zero COVID stuff, halted some of the key domestic operations. But again, they didn't have the railroad capacity. Not only has China got 350 power plants itself, it's built 650 power plants in other countries. And they're allowed to do that. Most of them are coal power plants. They built a thousand, they got between what they have domestically and what they built in other countries, 1,000 coal power plants. Why are they allowed to do that?

But American companies and European countries are not allowed to do it. We're not even allowed to have that for our own use. Again, it's a massive transfer of wealth. That's all this is about. This is not about, they don't believe any of this stuff, and neither should you. It's a hoax. All the climate stuff is a hoax. Uh,

so the, um, that's, this is happening. Just, just one last story here. And this, uh,

climate change stuff, uh, Daimler Benz, Mercedes has, uh, got their electric truck. We, we have to do everything that we can. You know, while, while China is allowed to build as many, Mercedes, has got their electric truck. We have to do everything that we can.

While China is allowed to build as many and as dirty coal power plants as they wish, India as well, we have to go through all kinds of complicated technical tricks to try to make battery-operated trucks. We can't have the trucks that we depend on to deliver goods everywhere in our supply chain. We can't have them operating on diesel fuel. No, no, no. And as a matter of fact, Biden is doing a spectacular job of starving us of diesel fuel.

As I pointed out, we got a short-term shortage of diesel fuel, but they say it's going to affect southeastern states, Tennessee, Virginia, Maryland, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama. All of them are on watch. They're saying there's just not enough diesel fuel. We've got to have the diesel fuel. That's what runs our transportation system and our supply chains, as well as an important part of our production of food and other things, but also the delivery of all that stuff. But we got to get rid of diesel, and we don't have anything to replace it. So they're scrambling around, the different truck companies are scrambling around as to what they can use to get rid of a diesel engine.

So Daimler Trucks has what they call the Gen H2. And what it does is it's got a battery plus a fuel cell. This is really being designed by politics and politicians. There's no reason to do any of this stuff. And if ever there was a Rube Goldberg design, this is it. They said they prefer to focus on the hydrogen powered fuel cell driving for long haul trucking up and down the mountains of Europe. And so this is what I've said before. I said, I just don't see with any of the current battery technology. I know they're talking about having another level of fast charger, but even with that, the amount

of time that it's going to take to charge up these things, they're just not going to have sufficient range. There's going to be too much downtime. So I don't know, are they going to switch out the battery packs or switch out the trucks? Is it going to be like the Pony Express or something? You know, you pull it up and you switch the trailer over to another truck and then you charge that thing for a day or so and, you know, you keep it in rotation. That might work. But I just, there's no way that you're going to keep everything connected that way. And when you look at how much battery capacity it has to have,

it's actually staggering because these trucks are pulling 80,000 pounds. And you just look at the physics of how much energy that is. How much energy is it going to take to transfer 80,000 pounds in a certain distance, right? I mean, that's what we're really talking about here, regardless of how you generate that and, you know, what it is that you use for a motor or generator, you've got a problem. I need to transport 80,000 pounds, you know, 500 miles or whatever. And then I've got to be able to pause and go again, you know, for another 500 miles.

And that can't be too long because time is money. Anyway, this is technically a hybrid, but because we're talking about politics here, we're not talking about science or anything else. A Daimler truck is shying away from using the term hybrid. I don't want to talk about a hybrid. Well, why? Because hybrid has the connotation for these environmental nuts that it's going to be something that has some internal combustion engine in it, right? We've got the hybrid cars like the Previa.

It's an internal combustion engine plus electric. And you've got both of them connected to the axle. That is the definition of a hybrid. Maybe we've got something like the Chevy Volt. It's not a hybrid, technically, because it's running a generator that is charging the battery., it can run off of the generator, but it's really the electricity that is still running it. So you've only got one type of drive that is driving the axles. In other words, the axle is not being driven electrically and by internal combustion directly, you know,

by some kind of an engine that is driven by internal combustion as simply being driven by electricity. So these people are saying, well, yeah, technically it's a hybrid, uh, because the axle is being driven, uh, by, you know, um, two types of energy that are powering the axle. Uh, so maybe you could call the, the Volta hybrid from that kind of definition. They say hyper truck ERX in Austin, Texas has a, uh, and they're owned by a company called,

um, actually hyper truck ERX, uh, is, um, owned by Hillian holdings and they have a natural gas conversion to electricity for up to 75 miles. It's sounding kind of like the Volt.

But the 1,000-mile promised range depends on burning natural gas instead of just converting it to electricity. But in the long run, they expect to replace natural gas with a hydrogen-powered fuel cell to be green. And you look at the expense of this and the complication of this and how it's not ready yet and how, as they put batteries in to drive these large semi trailers, you know,

again, they have, they're trying to pull 80,000 pounds. They're saying that they're going to be typically putting in 10,000 pounds of battery, 10,000 pounds of battery. 10,000 pounds. Can you imagine the fire when there is an accident? This is going to be way, way, way beyond the buses that became such an issue in so many different European cities. One bus has a fire,

catches the entire depot on fire, burns the entire thing down in Germany. They've had multiple bus fires that were very difficult to put out in France. So they just, you know, move the thing off to the site. But can you imagine a big semi-trailer with 10,000 pounds of batteries? I mean, just again, from a physics standpoint, this is just insanity. I used to have a, uh, engineering professor who was, uh, uh, he was kind of leaning towards all this green stuff. And he was saying, you know, the idea that we're going to use, um, uh, two tons worth of metal wrapped around us to transport our little body somewhere that ought to be, uh, two tons worth of metal wrapped around us to transport our little body somewhere that ought to be, uh, something that bothers all of you as engineers, as it doesn't bother me, but, uh,

I'm perfectly fine with it because I've got other calculations besides efficiency of energy. Uh, because I'm, I'm looking at how much it costs or whatever we, if we don't artificially inflate the costs, we can afford to do that. But that bothered him a great deal. He must be flipping in his grave now when he looks at what is happening with these EV battery trucks that they're proposing. Anyway, this was also interesting. As I said, you look at the absurd technological things that are being done in order to stop the production of carbon dioxide. And here, as we're talking about the excessive weight of these things, the complications of how they're trying to create these fuel cells,

as well as the danger of the lithium batteries. I wonder what happens when the lithium batteries catch fire and you've got these fuel cells. I wonder if that's another thing. It'll be kind of interesting to see what happens as long as you're not anywhere close around it. But here's the most amazing thing from this article. For these fuel cells, they use liquid hydrogen

cooled to minus 250 253 degrees Celsius. Minus 253 degrees Celsius. Now, this is unbelievable. This is absolutely unbelievable. This is like the vaccines that they were pumping around. But that was a lot. That wasn't as bad. I mean, the vaccines were

only like minus 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Absolute zero, which is really kind of a theoretical low temperature, is minus 273 degrees centigrade. Zero Kelvin, they call it on that scale. Minus 273 degrees centigrade or Celsius. This is minus 253 degrees Celsius. Almost there. And again, you can't get to that theoretical limit because of quantum issues and everything. So you get near to it. That's as close as you can get. So this is pretty much as close as you can get to absolute zero. This is not a laboratory that we're talking about. This is trucks, trucks. How are you going to maintain this? What kind of absurd technological hoops are we going to jump through to satisfy these idiots who are putting tomato paste on their head and rubbing it on paintings and the museum. This is the absurdity of this situation.

We're going to try to have massive trucks with 10,000 pounds of batteries and then a hydrogen fuel cell that we keep near absolute zero, driving it down the road? Are you kidding me? This is a plan to starve us all and to truly make sure that we have nothing because they're banning the stuff that works to put out these kind of Rube Goldberg contraptions. We'll be right back. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

My son just pointed out to me that I met Prius and I said Previa. It was a Freudian slip. I like the Previa. Not that I have anything against the Prius as well, but we did have a Toyota Previa. That's why I said that. We kept that car for over 20 years. And we drove it to the moon and halfway back

in terms of the amount of mileage that we got out of that thing before, uh, it's internal combustion engine finally came up. It was a great car. It was a very practical car. Um, but moving on, let's talk about some of the things that are happening in society, uh, in terms of hatred and intolerance. You know, we began by talking about Elon Musk and Twitter. And, you know, there's certain things that are just not going to be allowed or tolerated in social media. And I think that's still going to be the case under Musk's direction because the censorship is coming from government.

The censorship is coming from the corporate deputies of government, the deputized state. This is a Christian baker, yet another one of these cases. How many of these cases are there going to be going all the way to the Supreme Court? This is yet another one who has now won. And another case that is also coming out of, well, no, the other, there was one guy in Colorado, the Masterpiece Bakery thing.

This one is coming out of California. They came after him twice. First, they came after him because he wouldn't make a wedding cake for a homosexual marriage. He's a Christian. And he said, look, I don't, if you service to anybody, I'll sell you anything you want to buy here off the shelf. You can buy cookies and cakes, any of this stuff. I'm not going to discriminate against you on that basis. But he says, if you want me to custom make a cake to celebrate a practice that I believe is wrong, you're basically trying to rub my nose in this, and I'm not going to do it.

And the Supreme Court agreed with him. And as soon as he won there, you had a guy come in and sue him because he wouldn't make a transversary cake for him. That's what I call it. It was the anniversary of his transition. So I call it a transversary cake. And he said, no, I'm not doing that either. And so then this guy sues him.

And complicit in all of that was the Colorado government. They were egging this on and a party to this persecution as well. So this is one out of California, also a Christian baker. She said it was scary what happened to her. She recounts this, and that's why I think it's interesting beyond the legal issues here, which I think are pretty clear, and the Supreme Court got it right, is what happened to her and how quickly it happened to her. Her name is Kathy Miller. She's the owner of Tastery's Bakery in Bakersfield, California. Now, you would think that if you're going to set up a bakery place, you'd be okay in Bakersfield, right? But no, Bakersfield is in California, so it is not

safe at all. The state unsuccessfully argued that the baker had violated the UNRU, that's the person who sponsored it, Civil Rights Act, California law protecting people from discrimination based on age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, religion, and other factors. So she was being discriminated. Her religion was being discriminated against. But these people said, well, you're discriminating against somebody's sexual orientation. As California typically does, they turn things upside down, inside out. Just take a look at what they do at the federal level, the Constitution. Look at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, for example.

What was the purpose of that? Well, that goes back to the church committee hearings in the Senate and the Pike committee hearings in the House back in the early 1970s because both the CIA and the NSA from their creation and inception right after World War II had been spying illegally on Americans. They were supposed to be focused on foreign spies and foreign lands. And so as a result of that hearing, they had the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which said, you are going to get a search warrant if you spy on anybody, even if it's a foreign citizen in the United States, you get a search warrant. The only exception to that is if it's a foreign individual in a foreign country. You can't do it to an American in a foreign country without a search warrant.

But because there is some national security issues, in order for you to get the search warrant, we're going to set up the FISA court, and you can go to that court and get a search warrant. And so they used that to get permission, quote unquote, from the FISA court to look at Mr. and Mrs. Verizon, as Rand Paul accurately described it. So they used the thing that was supposed to restrict them from spying on Americans to give them cover for spying on Americans. And so this is upside down and inside out, this California civil rights law as well. Uh, so the Thomas Moore society defended her and the, uh,

person who was a special counsel in charge of her case that she's happy to serve gay customers. And she's also had gay employees. So she certainly doesn't discriminate against gay people. Um, and again, you know, it's, um, it goes back to her religious preferences. Uh, when we had our video stores, we had a gay employees. As a matter of fact, we had, um, uh, one super nice person who was a manager at one of our stores. And, um, she wanted to, um,

she's in this lesbian relationship and she wanted to adopt kids. And she wanted us, because we're good friends. We had a very good relationship. She wanted us to give her a recommendation to adopt the kids. We said, can't do it. Can't do it. And she wound up leaving. And she would have sued us in today's environment.

But that would have been a violation of my religious beliefs, Karen's. So we couldn't do it. I felt bad for her. I liked her. But, you know, I'm not going to violate my religious beliefs. Sergei, thank you very much for the tip. He says, as a former California resident, good for you for getting out of there, I can say firsthand that you cannot share your political views with anyone if you're conservative,

or you risk losing your livelihood. Yeah, that's absolutely right. And we don't want that to happen everywhere. Anyway, so she was happy to serve gay customers. She had gay employees. She did not discriminate. The judge basically found that there was no discrimination. There was no invidious motivation.

There was no animus towards gay people. The case began five years ago. She said it was two men and two women and another older woman who came in. A woman who came in. Sounds like it's a setup, and I'll show you how it is a setup here. Once it became clear that she was being asked to make a cake for a same-sex couple, she said she needed a minute to pause, pray, and reflect. She said, I said to them, let me go and get some more paperwork. She said, I went to the side and I prayed very hard and I

asked the Lord to give me wisdom, she said. And I just started visiting with them. And then I told them I couldn't do their cake. And I said, I'm sorry, but I can't hurt my Lord and Savior. I can't participate in this union because God says it's a sacrament between a man and a woman. These faith-based sentiments might not have shocked many who frequented the bakery, as Christian music often played inside, and there were books and Bibles on display. These people, these five people who came in, knew exactly what they were doing.

I mean, she's got Christian music playing. She's got Bibles propped up. She's got Christian books propped up. They went in there to bait her. This is no different than going into a Jewish deli and telling them, I want you to make me a Nazi cake. And I want you pictures of Hitler and all this other kind of stuff. It's the same type of thing.

It was a direct type of thing. It was a direct attack against her religion. They wanted her to bow the knee. They targeted her. Miller said she referred the couple to another person whom she described as an amazing decorator, a fellow baker who is part of the LGBT community and is married to another woman. In the past, this option had worked out well

for customers in similar situations. I know somebody who's a great baker. She's a lesbian too. She'll be happy to do your cake for you. No. This is about rubbing her nose in the cake. She said, this time it was different. I didn't realize it, but she said within two hours, within two hours, we were bombarded by hate mail, by death threats, by rape threats, and the media was storming into our bakery.

The whole thing was a setup. It started within two hours of this setup and it went on for five years, five years. You know, it's one of the things that made me so angry with Gary Johnson, the libertarian party, when all this stuff was happening initially and he was running for office. Somebody asked him about that. Somebody asked him about, you know, free speech and whether or not you know twitter could censor your speech and things like that no yeah no you know twitter can censor your speech but a small baker can't and it's like this is nothing other than your prejudice and your bigotry against christians

gary that's all this is. He even made the absurd claim that what these bakers were doing was like the power company cutting off electricity to a homosexual couple because they didn't like their sexual practices, right? It's not that at all. Electricity company has got a monopoly, and it's a monopoly that's been granted

by the government. And so they can't discriminate against people and cut stuff off. I said, if you want to know what's going on, if you want a real analogy, the thing that you have no problem with, uh, Twitter or YouTube or Google or Facebook or any of these other people,

I said, those people deciding that they're going to shut down the digital public square or the global public square, or they're going to censor on behalf of government. The analogy for that is like taking a, a company like the phone company that has a, you know, government grant of monopoly that they used to have and having, um, what was her name from last then? One ringy-dingy, two ringy, you know, the operator lady. I can't remember the actress's name right now.

But anyway, it's like having her sitting there listening, eavesdropping on your phone conversation, and then calling up her superiors and saying, I don't like these people for whatever reason. Shut off their service because I don't like what they're saying. Shut it off. I said, that's what's going on with the social media companies. But that's not what's going on with the bakers.

They don't have a monopoly. As a matter of fact, she said, oh, here's a lesbian cake maker. She's great. You know, go to her. She'll be happy to do it. That wasn't what this was about at all. And it wasn't what the whole thing is about. And Gary Johnson had absolutely no clue.

Wrong analogy, even. So anyway, she said she even had to briefly shut down her bakery because of the chaos that ensued. And she said the entirety of the ordeal left her feeling very vulnerable. Thomas More Society is a law firm that takes on pro-life and religious freedom cases, and they said the attorneys there, she said, understood why she took such a firm position on the matter. She said, everybody knows what a wedding cake, the lawyer for Thomas More says,

everybody knows what a wedding cake stands for. And if you have to use your artistic abilities, either to write a poem or paint a picture, in this case, design and create a beautiful wedding cake, that's a form of expressive speech. And that is protected under the First Amendment. But you see, we have churches who don't even care about that. A good example of this is what's happening in the Presbyterian

Church USA. You know, there's at least three different Presbyterian Church groups that I'm aware of. There was a big split, I think it was back in the 1920s, you know, when we started, you hear the term fundamentalist that came out. Well, that happened within the Presbyterian Church and at Princeton and some other places because there was a disagreement. You had the Presbyterians, the majority of them, were saying that they were going to deny

what the other people believed were fundamental aspects of the faith. You know, the inerrancy of the Bible, miracles such as the virgin birth and the resurrection of Christ, and all these different things were there. And they said, well, these are fundamental things, and we're going to affirm these. But the Presbyterian Church USA did not want to. And so there was a split at that point in time, and the smaller group that left was called the Orthodox Presbyterian Church USA did not want to. And so there was a split at that point in time. And the smaller group that left was called the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. And then the Presbyterian Church USA continued to drift even further to the left until there

was another split sometime in the middle of the 20th century. I don't know exactly when it happened. I'm not Presbyterian. But then that became the Presbyterian Church of America. And now the Presbyterian Church continues to drift to the left. Now they have just added a third gender category for members, non-binary. And so alongside, you know, when you join their church, they want to know if you're male, female, or non-binary.

Well, there's no such designation exists. That is a denial of God's word. You know, these are the way that mainstream liberal Christianity has evolved. First, it denied that God created, and now it denies that God created male and female. So, just going to keep going. As we look at what is happening in other countries, and I've talked about this before in terms of, even before we started having church shootings here in the U.S., there was horrific shooting in South Africa when the Marxists were going about killing people. I've talked about that many times. I interviewed the guy Charles van Vick,

who was a missionary in South Africa, and he wasn't really attached to any particular church, but he was visiting a church one Saturday. he had had, there was a lot of violence there. And, and he was initially, did not think that he should have a gun, shouldn't carry a gun, but then he thought more about it. And he thought, you know, I have a responsibility to protect my life, to defend my life. If I don't, it's kind of suicidal, but I also have an obligation to defend other people. And so he got a small pistol, five shots, and he

practiced with it. And so he visited a congregation, it was a liberal church, mostly white, in a very wealthy area. And later on, they found out in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that this group of Marxists, black Marxists affiliated with the African National Congress, had targeted that because they figured that because it was a white, wealthy congregation, there wouldn't be anybody there to defend it. And they were right. There wasn't. And so he's visiting this church. And these guys come in at the front of the church, big church, over 1,000 people, came in, threw grenades, and then sprayed the congregation with fully automatic machine gun fire as this commenced he's all the way in the back corner and he stands up and pulls

out his gun and takes a couple of shots he thinks i'm never going to hit anybody here from this distance and so he goes out the back and comes about around the side takes another couple of shots at him at that point they ran away and they said later on the truth and comes around the side, takes another couple of shots at him. At that point, they ran away. And they said later on the truth and reconciliation thing that they thought there were multiple shooters and that the first shot had actually hit them and that they thought they were being attacked from multiple places. And they ran away, even though they had machine guns and fully, uh, you know, fully automatic machine guns and they had grenades, they ran away. So the bottom line, and he was saying that even in the 90s.

He was saying, it's coming to America. You need to have people who are going to be there to defend you. And now we've seen that, unfortunately, happen several times, churches being shot up. In Nigeria, it's gotten to be very bad. Leaders are urging Christians, political leaders, are urging Christians there to defend themselves after militants have killed 70 in several days of attacks there.

Leaders in Benyoo, Nigeria, are seeking to give Christian farmers AK-47s, assault rifles. They could get ARs, but you know, AK-47s, assault rifles. They could get ARs, but you know, AK-47. For self-defense, after suspected militant herdsmen killed at least 70 Christians in several days of attacks there. Well, they're not militant herdsmen. They're militant Muslims who are trying to hell-bent on eradicating Christians by murdering them.

We're standing on our request for the federal government to give us a license for our volunteer guards to bear AK-47s and other sophisticated weapons. Wow, that's kind of like the way the Second Amendment is supposed to work, right? The government should not be prohibiting guns. The government should not have a problem with military weapons. As a matter of fact, the government should be supplying the weapons and the training to people, to the militia. That's really what the Second Amendment is about, to defend ourselves from enemies foreign and domestic. So what they're actually calling for is for something to happen just like the Second Amendment. Former Ben Yu governor also called on Christians to defend themselves.

Since the federal government has gone to sleep and does not care about the security of the people, he said, it is time for them to rise up and defend themselves. We cannot continue to allow herdsmen terrorists to keep on killing these peasant farmers and destroying their property. In just two days, over 70 Christians were killed by Fulani militiamen in our local government area. And many people understand the government is somewhat complicit with that as well. We in the U.S. are not faced with this exactly, but it's starting to ramp up.

We have a couple of doctors who are talking about how they're going to lose their livelihood, just as many people lost their livelihood because they refused to comply with the vaccine mandates. This is coming about because of the transgender surgery and mutilation and chemicals to block their hormones or to change other things. You know, I found it interesting. I saw this recently.

Do you know where all this, the first transgender mutilations began? In the corrupt Weimar Republic of Germany. Yeah. That republic known for its decadence. That's where they premiered this mutilation. Two bold doctors are speaking up about what they see as bullying tactics aimed at silencing critics and the truth and punishing doctors who do not go along with it.

One of them is a pediatric endocrinologist who they're demanding give dangerous chemicals and castration chemicals to young kids. The other one is a family doctor and so they're talking about what is pressure that's being put against them and I don't have time to get into that. But don't forget that we have a program on Rockfin for subscribers to Rockfin.

Of course, if you subscribe through us, it helps us more, but after you subscribe to any channel on Rockfin, you can watch all of the premium content. And check out thedavidknightshow.com. We'll be putting up these coins these excellent coins and we got a little coin holder a black coin holder for it you'll be seeing that soon there as well thank you very much the David Knight show.com the common man. They created common core to dumb down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you.