The David Knight Show - 29Aug23 Miles of Black Curtains in Maui — What Are They Trying to Hide? Sadiq Khan's Sadistic Con to Crush Common People's Mobility

Episode Date: August 29, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESMiles of Black Curtains in Maui: What are They Trying to Hide? As they redact documents, now miles of black curtains to hide what's going on. Here's why I think they're doing it… (2:05) Firsthand report of what happened in the British Columbia fires. (17:33)Queer in Sevier — Sevierville, TN brings children and Drag-ons together in small town TN. And listener letters (38:05)Sadiq Khan's Sadistic Con and War on Cars & Self-Driving FailsLimiting mobility, the renter economy where you own nothing, and the 15-Minute Smart City — all coming worldwide but being implemented NOW in London with a tax-by-mile on the way as well. And Tesla faces its first lawsuit for death by self-driving "autopilot". (56:07)Answer 3 Questions, Push a Button & DieFrom a "Doctor Death" in Europe who let's you commit suicide after answering 3 questions, to prisoner executions in America using the same technology. (1:20:15) Listener to the live show says I hate police…my response (1:43:34)Listeners on politics (1:44:27) )and WATCH: Trump's MILLION DOLLAR MUG SHOT — is a pose ripped off from Stanley Kubrick's "Kubrick Stare" that he had actors use to show peak mental derangement (1:49:58)The nation's "journalists" remain silent about persecution of Assange as an investigational journalist. A lawyer says the same thing is happening with the Trump case in Georgia with lawyers charged for political purposes while other lawyers cowardly keep quiet (1:59:35)Judge rules against RFKj and says YouTube can censor political candidates. NO, they can't, legally. And some amazing statements by Ramaswamy (2:05:54)INTERVIEW Confronting Pedo-Predators in Our Communities Evil predations and debaucheries are given a pass now if tied to LGBT. If this evil directed at children is going to be stopped, it will be by ordinary people at the local level. Bradlee Dean, SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, joins to talk about getting past our passivity in confronting evil in our home towns, our schools, and with our children. (2:30:15) Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Drive safe and obey the rules of the road. Vehicle owners who receive a red light or speed camera violation can pay or dispute online at toronto.ca.aps. Have you received a red light or speed camera violation in the mail? Vehicle owners can pay or dispute online. Learn more at toronto.ca.aps Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 29th of August, Year of Our Lord 2023. Well, today we're going to take another look at some of the strange happenings in Maui. There's now a miles-long black cloth wall that's been put up, curtain if you will,

to hide what is going on behind the curtain. It gets more suspicious every day. We're also going to take a look at the murder, suicide, and executions that are happening. It sounds like a downer show, but it's not going to be. We've got some other information that is going to be more uplifting. Look, we don't have to. We have to see what these people are doing as they push for population control and everything else. But we understand that our reality is outside and above what they're trying to sell us. We'll be right back. Well, there is, as I said, a giant black curtain that has been erected in Hawaii. And the headline from Trump media says the Biden curtain, they call it.

This is much bigger than Biden. This is a globalist agenda. Both parties are involved in it. Miles of black curtains erected to prevent people from seeing what is happening at the site of the catastrophic fires in Hawaii. And again, as I played some of these videos yesterday from Jeff Cygnus on YouTube, TikTok, and he spells his name with a G, G-E-O-F-F, Cygnus, C-Y-G-N-U-S. He's doing some great citizen reporting there. This is what he says and shows about the Black Curtain. There seems to be a huge emphasis on ensuring that the media and anyone else can't see what's going on here in Lahaina, West Maui. There are miles and miles of this black fence going up that was not here before that is obscuring ground zero

and making sure no one can see what's going on inside of there from the road. No one can get in there. No one can take any pictures. And then I've also seen these weird foreign police cars showing up, these special police. I'm not sure what to call them. This is a Nissan, but there's quite a large presence of these standing guard around the perimeter. We've also lost our ability to fly drones really anywhere near this area. Now, this 20-second clip here that I tried to get out of my car and show what was going on, I was almost immediately, after these 20 seconds, National Guard came, chased me off, yelled at me,

told me to get back in my car and keep moving. So you cannot pull over. You can't even stop your car anywhere near any of this anymore. Now, I'm going to show you a fairly long clip that shows just how extensive the fencing is on the western side of the main highway here. And they're also... And it is very extensive.

And it does go on for quite a while. And so let's talk about why they're doing that, perhaps. As he said, miles and miles of black fence going up. Not here before. Immediately as he gets out, he's there for like 20 seconds, the National Guard comes in and tells him he's got to leave. You can't pull over. You can't stop your car anywhere.

You can't see what's going on here. Is that suspicious? Well, in a sense, it is what our government always does, isn't it? Everything our government does is hidden from us. Because they're concerned that if we see what they're doing, we're going to do something about it. And I think when I look at this, you know, this is being redacted.

It's like they do with documents. I showed you a couple of days ago, the European Parliament members, and said, we'd like to see this agreement that you made with Pfizer, Moderna, and these other companies that Trump gave all that money to and bragged about creating that shot without any testing. They would like to see where these agreements are. Then this is what we got back. And he holds up sheet after

sheet, completely blacked out, just like what is happening there. Same way they redact their documents, they're redacting that scene, the scene of that crime. And it is a crime. And whose crime is it? It is the government's crime. It is the government that killed those people. The argument and speculation is over how they did it. Was it done out of criminal neglect? Or was it deliberate? I think it was criminal neglect. But let me tell you, as the FBI said that there's more than a thousand people who are still missing, they've probably erected those things and the media blackout and saying, you can't fly drones over this area. They're probably doing all of that because they don't

want you to see the recovery of the bodies. They don't want you to see the charred bodies that they're going to be pulling out. Can you imagine the anger if the people really saw what the government had done to their friends and neighbors and family? Can you imagine the anger if people saw in these redacted documents the partnership that the government made with these vaccine companies to kill us? Can you imagine what it would do to the re- reelection campaigns of Biden and Trump, for example, or any of these other people who pretty much are all involved in this? I mean, even Ramaswamy was on the Ohio COVID pandemic board, and he was trying to make

money with surveillance. And he made all of his money in the pharmaceutical industry, not even as a scientist, but as a Martin Shkreli partner and that type of guy, con man. So if we were to see this about these people, that'd make all the difference in the world, wouldn't it? You know, when I think about the charred bodies, I think about the failed rescue mission that Carter oversaw the summer before that 1980 election. They had the Iranian hostage situation, and they were going to send in some special forces troops for a rescue,

and they collided in the desert. And the helicopters blew up in fire, and then the Iranians went out and showed the pictures of those charred bodies of the U.S. soldiers there. They publicized that. Now, you know that citizen journalists would show those bodies and it would have the same effect. Can you imagine the outrage? I think there would be a call for criminal charges and there should be a call for criminal charges for both Maui as well as for Pfizer, as I've said many times. You know, I don't think they're going

to send Trump to jail because this is about the political campaign. We'll get into a little bit of that later on. That's not really our concern, right? Pence says that Americans and the conditions that we're under are not his concern. Most of them won't say that out loud, but he did. But the reality is that it's not Trump's concern, it's not Biden's concern, it's not DeSantis' concern. Not Ramaswamy's concern. Haley, any of these people. None of them are concerned about you. They all want to be rich men north of Richmond. They don't care what's happening to you. And they will cover up what they do to you. It's always been this way. Meanwhile, FEMA,

the Federal Emergency Management Association, reportedly said that, or agency, I should say, association, might as well be, said it was asked by Maui officials to stop posting new imagery of damage and disaster debris starting now. This is a complete blackout

of what they've done. And look, I say the government is responsible. The only question is, was it bad government, neglectful government that created this? Well, yeah, at the very least. At the very least, you could say it was bad government, which then became evil in the way that it blocked people from being able to escape. The other alternative is the government was evil and then became even more evil, right? Deliberately lighting it. I think the first one is really what happened. I think they were criminally negligent and bad,

and then I think they became evil. And now they're trying to cover that up. They're trying to hide that with those miles and miles of curtain, redacting the scene of the crime. Because everything the government does is hidden from you, while they demand to know everything, everything that we do. As a matter of fact, in the UK, as well as in Europe, you know, the DSA, the censorship, massive censorship thing they've been working on for a couple of years, threatening Elon Musk with for a couple of years. As soon as he said he was going to get Twitter, I guess that was a little over a year ago. They sent Theory Breton, I think is the guy's name, over to tell him, well, we got this thing called the DSA. It's coming, and you're going to do everything.

We said, yes, yes, I will. Yes, I will. That's how Elon Musk got so rich, doing everything that every government tells him to do and collecting massive amounts of cash for doing that. And so now that became effective on Friday, August the 25th. We should be seeing some action. And so now that became effective on Friday, August the 25th. We should be seeing some, you know, action.

They're probably drawing up their plans right now to come after Twitter or X and all these other social media platforms to show their authority to censor worldwide, which is what the EU wants to do with the DSA. So that began on Friday. That became effective on Friday. It's going to start dropping any day now, these censorship charges. As they demand to know everything about us, they won't let us say a thing, show a thing that they're doing. And that's what this is. This is massive censorship in 3D.

I've said for the longest time, when you look at these smart cities, you look at things like sidewalk labs that Google is doing in Toronto. What that essentially was, they've taken over in a completely totalitarian way, cyberspace. And I said, these smart cities, they want to dictate and rule over us and control everything we do in physical space, like they already do in cyberspace. And so now you see what they're doing in physical space with this redaction, just like they redact and cover up and censor and hide and lie about everything they do. They gave the excuse that this is cultural sensitivity and um so uh they're asking for a full stop in disaster imagery going forward at this time we've not been asked to take any photos or videos down our team

on the ground is coordinating with the county for further guidance to ensure that we remain fully said FEMA. Cultural sensitivity is of the utmost importance. BS. Pure BS. This is about covering up their crimes, as always. They cover everything. They lie to us about everything. You think they're going to tell us the truth when massive numbers of people have

been killed with their neglect? When as people are saying, when the sheriff says they're going around knocking on doors, telling people to get out, they say that's a lie. Nobody heard that. We haven't found anybody who will attest to that. Show us the camera footage.

You got body camera footage? Showing you go door to door, warning people to get out? We do have the footage of you blocking people. We do have the footage of you hurting and corralling people back into the fire. Why are Maui officials so desperate for a media blackout? Says a commentary on one, says woman system. I'm not sure what that is. It said, is cultural sensitivity their main concern?

Or is something more dubious driving their desperation to stop the world from seeing what is really happening here? Meanwhile, James Woods had some things to say on Twitter on X. He said, someday after all this land is appropriated, Hollywood will make a movie about this. He said, rich people in tuxedos will celebrate their compassion and they'll give each other little gold statues and then everything will be forgotten and then he linked this video which i'll show you a little bit of it's about five minutes long so we're not going to play all this there was a police barricade blocking the street so people couldn't get out but the people trying to escape in those cars that you see burnt, they were blockaded in there. The water was shut off. Firefighters couldn't fight this. The local people couldn't save their own homes. School was canceled that day.

You had children, our cakey babies, and elderly trapped in the homes. That's who they're recovering as a Hawaii native as somebody born and raised on the island of Maui as somebody who has family and friends and community over there please keep talking about it please keep talking about it share videos comment on posts like videos even if it feels icky liking them it helps the algorithm push this message push them their messages out make sure right and that's right you need to uh if you want to get media out share it post it like it that helps a little bit and i would say that helps

with this program as well something that you can do to help us. It doesn't cost you anything other than just a couple of seconds to try to push that out, whether it's on social media or other places. Steve Malloy, someone I've worked with before, and I trust him, and we have pretty much the same perspective on this. He said, the blame for the Maui fires depended on bad government. Like I said before. Is it bad government that then acted evil to contain people and force them into the fire? Or was it evil from the start, and I think it was bad and then compounded with evil actions. Hawaiian Governor Josh Green and the media pointed the finger at climate change.

Of course, that's not it. Climate change is their excuse for everything, and climate change is their excuse to be a bad government, to be an evil government, to take food from us, mobility, liberty, everything from us, to make sure that we own nothing. And we'll be happy about that because they'll tell us that they saved us from climate change. So he says they're pointing in the wrong direction. Dry grasslands, windy conditions, one or more sparks is all it took to put Maui ablaze. The bad government had set fuel canisters around everywhere waiting for it to burn. As I said, the way you think about this is to think about them putting, you know,

old paint and linseed oil and rags and stuff all over the place and just waiting for it to ignite. Well, I wasn't anywhere around when that happened. I don't have anything to do with that. The lightning strikes can ignite wildfires. Most are touched off by some human activity, a downed power line, a negligently extinguished campfire, or arson. In May 2022, Maui officials investigated arson as a cause of wildfires that had been set all over the island. So the Maui government actually had actual knowledge of drought conditions, constructive knowledge that arson was a possibility. Steve doesn't say it, but in 1984, they had, not 1984, in 2014, I'm sorry. It is like 1984, isn't it? In 2014, they'd been given a detailed report about what they needed to do to clean up the infrastructure,

but they were too busy playing their climate change games, grifting the system for money. That's what that's all about. It's about taking everything from us, but first they get rich. They and their buddies. No warning was issued to the public or emergency plans made for the possibility of wildfire until it was too late. And so when you look at this, it is a story that we see over and over again, but this was sent to me from a listener, Arnold, who found this. This is a blog that somebody put in about the Canadian, the British

Canadian wildfires that we talked about a couple of weeks ago. We said, look at this. They set this backfire and it gets out of control. They don't warn the residents sufficiently. And the residents are going around and grabbing equipment to fight the fire themselves. Well, the residents are grabbing equipment to fight the fire themselves. But, the residents are grabbing equipment to fight the fire themselves. But this person who writes the blog says the idea that they're going around and stealing the equipment from the firefighters. He says that's to excuse the police who are doing some really criminal stuff there as well. When things, when chips are down, things are really bad, you can always count on the police to make it worse, can't you? It's just amazing to me.

And you stop and think how many police we have and how few of them are accountable in any way, shape, or form. The only law enforcement we have in this country that is accountable is the sheriff. And other than that, none of these people are accountable to anything, and they've become real monsters. Just listen to this story here, uh, and, uh, shoe swap, the firestorm. So during the firestorm, I'll show some of these pictures, Travis, during the firestorm, a brave neighbor drove up the road to check on our place. Yeah. That picture right there, the first one show that, um, took an amazing photo. That's that picture right there, the first one. Show that. Took an amazing photo. That's that picture right there of the hillside behind our home ablaze. Yet the fire never went past the area that had been watered. You want to know one of the reasons why Oprah Winfrey and a lot of these celebrities' homes didn't burn? Well, here this guy is telling you. That's his home

right there in the foreground. Very nice home. Scroll up and show the next picture there. They can see it a little bit better. Very nice picture. It's got a metal roof on the top. It's got a lot of stonework. It is a log home.

But they have in the log home will burn. That's for sure. I mean, these trees are just spontaneously combusting after it gets hot enough. But they've watered the lawn. They've done other things to clear it out. He talks about how they even looked at some of the decorative plants that they had there and said, you know, these things could be a fire hazard, and they removed those. They said the fire never went past the area that had been watered. This successful protection of our home should serve as a prime example of why everyone who lives in rural areas

needs to do fireproofing to protect their homes. And then he, this is his blog on August the 21st, about eight days ago. It's about the time, well, we picked up on the story a couple of days after that. And he talks a couple of days after that about stories going out about, you know, the firefighting equipment being taken.

A fire, he said, caused by lightning, started above the west side of Adams Lake and grew slowly, then initially exploded on July 20th due to a wind storm. Early in August, it moved down the hillside and if not for a huge effort by firefighters, it would have destroyed homes and cabins along the lake. The fire continued to grow due to the winds and edged further southeast toward the North Shuswap community. By the third

week of August, it was about six kilometers away from the properties. When the weather report, now this is where we picked up the story about the backburn stuff. He said when the weather report. Now, this is where we picked up the story about the backburn stuff. He said, when the weather report indicated that a strong northerly windstorm would hit on the evening of August 17th, the BC Wildfire Service, British Columbia Wildfire Service, made the extremely risky decision to use a controlled burn, a back burn, in order to reduce the fuel load in front of the fire. These things are always risky, but when there is a large wind, it's stupid. And of course, they saw that the winds were going to pick up even more, so it's like, well, let's do this before the winds picked up.

No, the winds picked up. And it turned out to be something like the quote-unquote control burn they saw in Palestine, Ohio. He said they lit the backburn using a helicopter and ping-pong balls filled with sodium nitrate and antifreeze. It was a massive fire that produced a giant mushroom cloud of smoke above the hills above our home, just like Palestine. The next day, the strong winds blew the combined fire down to Lee Creek and other places, which we don't know, so I won't repeat the names, but it destroyed approximately 100 homes, cabins, and businesses.

He said, and south of the bridge before moving up the mountain. This end of the fire continues to threaten South Shuswap and other places. So that was about eight days ago. And so he says, so here's some takeaways from this, from what he's seeing there on the ground. First of all, he says the British Columbia Wildfire Service is ultimately responsible for this mess. Bad government. Did not adequately respond to the fire when it began.

Response waited until it grew and nearly burned houses at Adams Lake. The back burn backfired. It was lit too far away from the fire. It was too late. And the Norley Windstorm was only hours away. So they completely botched every aspect of that backburn. He said the evacuation order came too late. Are we starting to see a pattern here?

Just like in Hawaii, many of these things. Currently it's primarily locals that are fighting the spot fires. Nevertheless, one of our friends' homes burned down yesterday from a spot fire that no one was able to get to. The local firefighters are loggers and contractors who have trucks, water tanks, shovels. They're working day and night to protect their homes and their neighbors' homes, and they are real heroes. There are some fire trucks from all over the province lending a hand. There were three fire trucks in our yard helping from Vancouver Island, Big White, Scotch Creek. In addition, the heroic efforts of the locals, the authorities are doing

everything they can now to stop them. They have brought police up from Vancouver to man checkpoints to keep people from driving in or driving through the community. But he's got a different take on the police that I'm going to talk about. They've had bad government, the British Columbia Wildfire Service, bad government in terms of not preparing, not warning, making the situation far worse. And then they bring in the police, and now the police have got their own agenda and we'll talk about that our regional district director is one of the local heroes he's also

defied the rules and remained to help even working to fight a fire in his community due to roadblocks this is now where the police are starting to get to be a problem. And we've seen this with every big disaster when the state and the federal governments and not, not the local people, but when you get to the people who don't live there and everything, they come in. All right,

we're taking control of this thing and locking all this stuff down. Nobody in or out. And all this, that really makes everything worse. And it has been standard operating procedure for a very long time. Due to roadblocks, locals have to use boats to get in and out and to bring supplies in. The police are blocking efforts to bring in supplies. Residents are sharing the food they have from their thawing freezers.

Two local restaurants are providing free meals. Now, he does finally in one of these things, well, you know, we just, the problem is a federal and the provincial government, in other words, a state government, he says, have been giving subsidies to big oil, and they're not preparing for this climate-boiling emergency. No, your problem is the government. It's not climate.

The climate is not boiling. We've gone over those statistics all the time. I'm just so sick and tired of people on both the left and the right using weather to prove or to disprove the climate. We can prove that there's not global warming and they have to prove that there is, quite climate. We can prove that there's not global warming, and they have to prove that there is, quite frankly. We can disprove that. We've got their emails where they know that it's not happening. And I've fought them in court on that stuff,

been with people who fought them in court. They know they're lying to you. You need to know they're lying to you. And you need to know why they're doing this stuff. The burden of proof is on them. They have to prove that it's our gas range that is setting the British Columbia on fire and Hawaii on fire. Yeah, prove to me that it's a gas range. Prove to me that it's an SUV, okay Prove to me that it's an SUV. Okay. Or shut up. And we have to tell them you're not taking our stuff and we have to start fighting

them at the local and state level on this thing. I know we can't manufacture these things at the local level, but we've got to start developing the skills. You know, I think one of the best things you can do, um, is, uh, learn how to repair stuff make this stuff last you know we've got cars that are pretty good but you know they're going to need to be repaired it's not beyond our ability to keep these things running for a very long time uh you want uh a lucrative position well learn how to help people convert these things so that they can run on some makeshift fuel that we can make locally. Figure out how to 3D print parts like Jay Leno does to keep his classic cars going when nobody's making the parts for him. It can be done.

It can be done. There'll be some clever people who will make a lot of money putting that out there. And you can jump into this at any level of a skill. Maybe you don't have the ability to manufacture those parts, but maybe you've got the ability to put them in and fix them for people, right? Contractors and loggers are busy working with the British Columbia Wildfire Service, building fire guards with heavy equipment. Yet, listen to this, these same contractors don't have permits. They can't get supplies as they're fighting the fire. They cannot even drive on the main road.

Listen to what the cops are doing. One friend was getting more water to protect his home. The police chased him and stopped him. Then they made him empty out the water in his truck. They then grabbed his camera that he was using to film the interaction and deleted the video. However, he was able to retrieve it from his trash bin. Then they impounded his truck and forced him to walk home. Thugs.

Thugs. These are thugs, these cops. Thugs. They don't do anything to help. Instead, they harass people who are trying to save their homes pour out his water not even going to use it for anybody the place is burning down and the cops will pour out the water

this is the perfect example of our government at work perfect example I don't know what it is about cops we had, as I said before, we had video stores. Let me just give you a personal story here. We had video stores, and one of them was located in a very unusual shopping center. It wasn't a typical strip center. Typically, they call them a strip center because they've got all the stores arranged in a you know a line or an l shape or u shape or something like that this is different it had a lot of different areas and

uh different uh even levels you know so they had at a center square where they had a food court and everything they had escalators taking people around it was a very nice shopping center but it's difficult for the retailers because they had created these different areas and they put us over with a video store they put us over with a video store. They put us over in the area where the movie theater was. Well, that's a good mix. You know, we'll put that there. And it's adjacent to where the food court and things like that, outdoor food court were. The problem was, was that our peak times coincided with the movie peak times. Everybody, you know, Friday nights and a Saturday and Saturday night, that's when they're going to rent a film. And at the same time, they're going to go watch a film. And so

we knew that and we had them put some, you know, this is reserve parking for the video store signs up there, which didn't help too much. But they had hired, you know, when the lease came up for renewal, said you've got to do more to enforce this. So they hired some off-duty cops. And what the off-duty cops did was when the people came by to drop off movies and, you know, they wouldn't say anything to the people that they would see parking these spots and go walking across the parking lot because the movie theater was quite far away.

It wouldn't say anything to the people who parked the car and were not walking into our store but going somewhere else. They wouldn't even politely say to them, you know, this is reserved for the customers who are going in and out of the video store. They did nothing about that. Instead, when our customers couldn't find parking spaces and they double parked, then they made a fire lane around everything, right? They double park and went in to drop off or to pick up movies because we did have a drop box there that they could drive through. But anyway, when they went

in to pick up the movies, you would give them tickets. It's like, what are you doing? We're paying you to be nice to people, but tell them that these are reserved parking. And instead, you're going back to cop mode. You're going to start issuing tickets to people when I'm paying you to do this stuff. I mean, I had a big issue with him and with these other people. I said, you're fired right now. And I called him. I said, he's leaving.

I said, you want rent from me? You fire this guy right now. It's just amazing to me to see this stuff happening. And that's not the only issue that we had with him. You know, we had another store. And again, you know, fire lane. Somebody would have a movie reserved. We'd, you know, they'd pull up, just run in to get the thing.

And, you know, the car's still running, basically. And we had some cops who just parked in the parking lot. As soon as they would see that, they would run over and give them a ticket. They're not even in there for a minute. And I saw this happen a couple of times. And I went out and I told the cop, I said, and the people were there. They came back and they got the ticket. I said, how much is that ticket?

You've got that much in store credit here. And I said, you don't have anything better to do than to do this, to harass people? And I said, get out of here. I said to the cops, they did. They got out of there. And then they came back with the fire department. And they parked their big ladder truck in front of our store. And they started giving the police officers rides on the ladder going up and down

for our benefit. I said, yeah, I know what you guys are about. You're to protect us, right? Both the police and the firemen. There's good people out there. But look, just like that one person he said is a hero. He's a supervisor. He's fighting the fires by hand. But then you got these other people doing this. They get into this mindset. You know, it's what you see happening with the TSA all the time.

More BC wildfire service personnel have shown up. One neighbor had to prevent a crew from lighting another backburn near their home. And then eventually they got a helicopter brought in instead to douse the fire. You have to watch these people. The main news story yesterday that continues today is that equipment used to keep the Key Bridge watered down was stolen or quote-unquote borrowed. They use this story continuously, he said, to justify the heavy police presence and the police lockdown. Yet there are many doubts about this story because nobody ever saw the equipment go missing. And finally, he says, the reason our home was saved due to the fire smart work that we've done over the past few years. We have

selectively logged our property, leaving most of the large trees, and near our home we removed most of the conifer trees. Knowing how dangerous decorative junipers are, we removed all the ones that posed a threat. On the day before the firestorm, we thoroughly watered the hillside behind our house, as that is where the fire would come from, as lawns covered the yard in front of our house. You see, ultimately, when we have criminal neglect and evil actions by the government, there are still things that we can do. And that's my point with all this stuff, to show you what is really going on. This is how the media will lie, how the government will lie, how they will make things worse after they've already kicked things off.

But it's still things that we can do at the local level. And we can work together with each other to try to put out these fires that the government starts in Stokes. And we can work with each other. We can prepare our homes as well. Again, you know, civildefensemanual.com. Take a look at that. Do some preparation about that. Just like these people said, well, you know, got to get the deadwood away from our house. We've got to get some of these things that are going to be much easier to light like these conifers and things like that get them away from the house then when they see the fire that water their lawn other things like that that's the kind of stuff you have to think about you have we

can't be so passive that we look to the government to save us from everything and then when they do the wrong stuff it's like oh no you know and that's what we do when we put all of our hope in politics, and especially in presidential politics. We are not their concern. And you better hope that you're not their concern. Because once you become their concern, once you become their target, then they get truly dangerous. Government is like a fire. A fearful servant and a dreadful master. We'll be right back. The common man.

They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Let's take a look before we get into more news. And by the way, in the third hour, we're going to have Bradley Dean, Sons of Liberty, is going to be joining us. And we're going to talk to him about some of the things that have happened in his area. He's been very active in terms of showing up with rallies and protests and things like that, especially with Target and some of these other things. There is a situation that's developing here in Tennessee, in Sevierville, Tennessee.

It's come to our attention that the City Hall found out about on Sunday at church. City Hall is going to be having a drag queen event with kids. Kids will be allowed and kids will be participating in it as well. They're bragging about that. They call it queer severe or severe queer. It's severely queer, I guess. And they're bragging about that. And a lot of pastors are writing each other saying, you know, what do we do about this? What do we do about it?

So unclear what's going to happen. By the way, it's going to be anybody that's in the Tennessee area, it's going to be on Saturday. So we'll see what happens with this. I'll tell you more about it as I find out about it. There's some question as to what the status was of the law against drag queens performing. And I'll get into that when we get into the interview with Bradley Dean. I won't talk about it now. I just want to say thanks to Arnold who sent that information about what was happening in Shoe Swap. He found that blog post. And I also want to pass this on.

One of the listeners, many of you know her from the discussions, Rhonda. She would like prayer for her grandson. You remember we talked about this a couple of weeks ago. There was a Christian guy who said his son had died. He had two children with this very rare disease that is essentially a wasting away disease, floppy arms and things like that that never develop. And he responded in that to some atheists who mocked him after his son died. And Rhonda said at the time, she said, my grandson has that. She said, his name is Maddox, and he suffers from Menka's disease.

It's like the child in the story a couple of weeks ago that was called floppy arms. It is terminal. It is a severe handicap. He has to have a tracheometry and a feeding tube. More severe than the child in your story, it appears. Please keep him in prayers. He'll be 11 in October. Also, my son and my family.

A terrible thing to have to bear with, with no end and no cure in sight. And so again, if you could keep them in your prayer. And we do not understand why these things happen. And we do not understand God's purpose in it. That guy who did the video, he does a lot of Christian videos on YouTube. And he speaks to that mystery of what happens. Why do children suffer? Why is there death and disease in the world? And of course, if you understand the Bible, you understand that all this death and suffering entered because of rebellion. And if you don't understand why that would affect us, well, then you don't understand your nature.

That's the key thing. We all, and there's a principle involved in all of this. It's a headship principle people don't like to talk about. It sounds too patriarchal, but it really is patriarchal. God put man and woman woman the two of them in charge to exercise dominion they were put in charge of the earth that he created and in the same way that when biden or trump gets us involved in a war, we all suffer. And that principle, that was all of creation, the entire universe was cursed because of that. It sounds like a severe penalty because we in our fallen

nature don't understand God's nature and we don't understand the nature of that rebellion and the extent to which it happened. So why does this happen to other people? And I guess the question is we need to ask ourselves is why has God extended mercy to us? Each and every one of us has rebelled if we're truthful. Each and every one of us has rebelled against God in many different ways. And God has graciously provided a way out of that for us. But, you know, it is something that has been passed on to us, an inherited condition, just the same as if you have a totalitarian government that destroys and enslaves the people, and you're born into

that situation of poverty and despotism and the rest of that. That's the system that we've all been born into in one degree or the other. And so, again, I know that it's a difficult thing to understand, but God does answer prayers in terms of mercy and strength. And he uses what was done for evil ultimately for good. We don't realize just how short this lifespan is. We have no grasp of eternity. And how this is a tiny micro dot of a line that extends forever. And that's where we take comfort in it.

And Rhonda has been very helpful to this show in terms of helping us to come up with topics to cut. And I mentioned this the other day, I got a letter here from another listener who this is from Gilbert. He said, I prefer your full shows posted instead of the segments, so definitely do full show listings to gain much needed freed up time to dedicate to your music, whatever else you want. And that's the issue. It doesn't take too much time to do the segments.

I give some ideas to Travis, and sometimes I can just hand it over to him. He does the thumbnails, the uploading. That takes a while. But what takes me a while is the full show outline. And so that's what I'm not sure about continuing. He also says, he says, amen on Alex Tucker and Trump. You have them pegged dead on, brother. I no longer listen to Stu Peters who calls himself a Christian and then calls gays every

ugly slur that he can. Again, we have to, when we look at things like this, right? It's not that we don't judge and call sin and evil, evil. God does that. But he does that so that we understand what our position is before him, so that we'll be looking for the mercy and the grace and the forgiveness that he offers. Just as Paul and Romans, one of the passages that they hate. And we have a woman who is a high-ranking government cabinet official, elected official. And when Scandinavian countries are trying to put her in jail because she quoted this passage. But it lists, it's got a long litany of all different types of sins. And in it, it does list

homosexuality, sexual sin that is heterosexual and all these other things. But it lists all those. And he says, and effeminate and all the rest of this. And then he says, and such were some of you.

Who's he writing to? The Christian. And such were some of you, but you were washed. You were cleaned, right? And that's what we have to offer to people. You don't have to be that way. When we see people who are doing that, it is horrific. And it does look, especially when you look at these drag queens and the way that they're, I call them dragons, you know. They're under the power of evil. It's almost like they're possessed. They're enslaved to it. And, you know, you're a slave to whatever you serve. They are enslaved to this, and we ought to feel sorry for them.

And we offer them a way out. We also understand that they are we offer them a way out. We also understand that they are not looking for a way out. There are many of them happy where they are. And so we need to, you know, not shy away from telling them. We also need to understand they're probably going to bite the hand that tries to feed them. Anyway, this is from Kenny. He said, the last 20 minutes of your show yesterday was powerful. You've shown The Procedure, that short animated film. A couple of times I couldn't watch it. I watched it today and I was in tears. It made me think about my niece, who's 27 now, married to a great guy. She was born a

weekend of my younger brother's senior year in high school. He said, I leaned left at the time. He gave his girlfriend money for abortion, but the girlfriend took her friends out instead. As I mentioned, I leaned left, but I didn't like abortion at the time. I thought it was appalling. And so now he has a 27-year-old niece who's wonderful. And we talk about the power of the truth. You know, I would like to see, don't give money to these politicians.

Create some kind of an organization that's going to buy time on cable or something and put this out or do a shorter version of it that you can run as a commercial. That's really what needs to happen. We need to be focused issue by issue on things. I try to do that with the politicians who are running. The only reason to talk about them is to focus on things issue by issue. But we need to push out the truth about this stuff. These people are sitting there arguing about who gets to decide who lives or dies and at what age they're going to be killed or allowed to survive.

That's not the discussion we need to be having. The discussion we need to be having is what is this thing that's being done? There is no video yet of the procedures that they're doing to mutilate kids. I mean, you look at this bottom surgery that they do to both boys and girls. What a horrific thing that would be to depict that. And then to have some interviews with some of the people who have suffered under that and are so distraught and in so much pain that they want to commit suicide.

To show what is actually done to people, to show the procedure, to show abortion, to show the sexual mutilation of kids being done by this heinous medical community, quote-unquote medical community that we now have. Same medical community that killed people in mass numbers over the last couple of years. This is from a Subscribestar listener, Andreas. He says, hello, David and family enjoyed the show, uh, yesterday, uh, August 28th. He said, uh, the break at exactly 120 minutes. Uh, love the music there. What is it? Um, and, um, Karen sent this to me, so I'm not sure if she

replied. We'll have to get her to reply to him. But, um, uh, that was the, from last of Mohicans. And it was, um, and if you want to hear the original, uh, from the movie soundtrack, uh, that is called Fort battle, I think is what they called it in the movie soundtrack. And so I put some clips in there of stuff from Last of the Mohicans. I'll play it for you here when we go on break. And I did my own version of it. So I have to do it shorter. So, you know, instead of it being three or four or five minutes, I think maybe that one was like seven minutes long. I don't know. It went on for a while. I don't know. It's been a while since I did it. But I listened to some of the themes and I put it together on my own because we have to do stuff that's shorter, number one. Number two, they use copyright strikes to take us down. That's one of the reasons why I do this music. But the real reason that I got into this

and started doing it was because decades ago, I started writing songs, putting words out of the psalms to music. As you look at the psalms, you see David right there, whoever it is, to the tune of the dancing deer or whatever. We don't know what that was. I have no idea what those songs were. Probably would not speak to us culturally today. But so I thought, you know, those things have been lost, but there's a lot of really good folk songs that have persisted

for hundreds of years. And so I tried to, um, uh, put some things to some folk songs that have been around and persisted for a while because that's music that lasts and has a persistence to it because there's something about these older songs that have a quality that survives. And so I'd done that just for my own benefit. It helps some people. We knew a Christian who said, yeah, I just can't memorize parts of the Bible.

But if it's in a song, I can memorize it. So I tried to make it as close as I could to the Bible. But if it's in a song, I can memorize it. So I tried to make it as close as I could to the song. And so I had that, and I wanted to be able to perform that. So that's why I started getting in all this music stuff. And then wound up having to do it because of my own show. I don't have a license to play other people's music like Alex does, or people who are on radio. If you're on radio, the radio station essentially gives you that license. And so we also do some Christmas stuff, and I'm trying to get some other Christmas songs done before the season because it's starting to get an earlier start on it this time.

One last thing before we take a break. This is from Newbecker. Thank you very much for this. And it is a link to the John Birch Society, jbs.org. Stop the forced COVID-19 vaccinations. And so the John Birch Society is good because they give you action items and they help you to take action. They give you links to talk to your senators and your congressmen and local state representatives and stuff like that. And, um, so they help you with the contact information.

They help to give you talking points and everything, but you don't need to give them a lot of information. You know, just tell them, uh, they weigh your response, not by how persuasive the rhetoric is, but by how many they get. And most people don't bother to send anything in. So if you do, you know, writing these letters matters a lot more than showing up to vote for these people. It really does. They don't know if you show up to vote. As a matter of fact, Ramaswamy hasn't been voting the last several elections.

He hasn't bothered to vote at all. So, you know, you could even run for president and not be a voter. And so much, he believes in the elections so much that he didn't bother to show up. And basically I'm in the same position now. I used to always vote, but not this last time. Not these last two times, as a matter of fact, 2020 and 2022. But anyway, this is a stop the forced mRNA jabs and the vaccine passport schemes and the mask mandates. And if you go to jbs.org,

you'll see this excellent thing here, which helps you to take action, gives you some information and some contact stuff. And so I just wanted to pass that along to people. So we're going to take a quick break here is the last of the Mohicans, uh, Fort paddle. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, as I said, the war on cars is escalating in London today.

The mayor, Sadiq Khan. Sadistic con man. He's now elevating this thing. And it's not just the fines that they have on people. And by the way, it's been reported over and over again, 12 and a half pound fine. That's the minimum. That's the minimum. I didn't realize that it can go up to 27 and a half pounds fine.

I think the 1250 is for cars. That out to about $15, um, you know, for a car. The other ones are probably for people, uh, working class people have to have a trucks and things like that. Uh, so, you know, you got a, uh, a repair business or something. Well, you should just go out there and buy a brand new electric truck, battery operated, of course, can't have a hybrid, a hybrid or anything like that. It's got to be battery operated. So that goes active today. As I said, the mass censorship by the EU, the DSA,

which are trying to push censorship now worldwide from the European Union, that became effective on Friday, but they haven't started charging people with it yet. But speaking of charging people, it isn't just Sadiq Khan's, well, you're driving an internal combustion engine in one of our ultra low emission zones. No, he's also going to be taxing people by the mile. So even if you've got a brand new electric battery vehicle, guess what? There's no free lunch. We got to save the planet. Everybody's got to pay. We got to stop all transportation. He's going to be taxing people by the mile, everybody by the mile. So if you've got an older internal combustion engine, you start out

with a man, you know, here's $15 to start with just to move it. And then we charge you per mile and we charge you per mile and we charge you. They're still going to charge the people with the older cars more money than they do for the people who have the, the new, um, um, battery operated vehicles. You start to get an idea as to what this really is about. If you've got enough money, you can do whatever you want in their new system, right? Where we used to live, Elon Musk has moved in there now in a big way, just a few miles from where we used to live in Texas. And he's got a headquarters there for boring and another one for, what was it? Was it

SpaceX or something that he's got some, I don't know. He's got a couple of his companies there that he's bought a lot of land and he's just decided that the waste, he's not going to feed it into the system there like everybody else. He's just going to dump it into the Colorado river there. It's like, you can't do that. I can go ahead and find me. I don't care. So they're hitting him with fines and he doesn't care. He just pays the fines. He didn't want to do his curb cuts off of the road the way the Texas Department of Transportation wanted to do it. So they're hitting him with fines. He doesn't care. He's going to do whatever he wants.

If you've got enough money, you can drive whatever you want as much as you want around London. You're going to have a situation where they're going to push all the riffraff, all the hoi polloi off the roads with our cars to make way for the sadistic cons and for the Elon Musks to drive around with their luxury limo, electric vehicles or whatever, or they only have to get an electric vehicle. You know, they can buy some gas guzzling hypercar and drive it around. Yeah, go ahead and find me. I don't care.

Just put it on my tab. Chicken feed to them. And so they're going to have green levies, and they will be discriminating against the cars. So the cheaper your car is, the more you're going to have to pay, cheaper and older. You see, this is to make sure that we have nothing. And the other aspect, there's two aspects to this tax by the mile. It's always been, and Eric Peters and I have always talked about this. You know, they have to, uh, they, one of the reasons that they like the electric battery vehicles

is because everybody's tethered to their grid their electric grid so that gives them control and they can limit how much you drive because they can limit the amount i'm sorry you know we went to renewable energy and it's just we thought we'd have it by now but we don't and so there's not electricity for you to charge your car so you just stay where you are and i know by the way if your car is charged we're going to have to pull some of that back out through the grid for everybody else that type of thing the other aspect of this is that since you can get charged anywhere instead of going to a station where you would fill up with you know gasoline or diesel or fill up with some alternative fuel or something like that, where they could tax you at that point.

Instead, you know, you can get your electricity anywhere. So we have to tax you by mile, which means that we've got to know everything that you do and we've got to completely surveil you. And so we've got to put this box in there. And oh, by the way, we have other uses for that box as well to control and to levy fines against you for the way that you drive or where you drive or how much you drive and all the rest of this stuff. That was always the plan. It's why they love and mandate these battery operated electric vehicles. It gives them an excuse to do everything that they want to do, which is to monitor us, to control us, to take away our mobility.

And so different charging rates will apply depending on variables such as how polluting your vehicle is, the level of congestion in the area, and whether or not you're driving it in an area where there's access to public transportation. So we're now starting to explore the potential for future road user charging, says the sadistic con man, mayor of London. A Reform UK London mayoral candidate says, and he's going to be challenging this con man in the next one, his name is Howard Cox, he says, these ultra-low emission zones have always been a front for the future pay-per-mile taxation plan. This dishonest mayor has always known this unpopular way to fleece drivers was his aim. The London government will look to introduce a new charging mechanism based on distance traveled and these other factors. And so now we can also see there's another aspect to this,

which is a 15-minute city. Well, you don't need to. You don't need to go anywhere. You're prohibited from going anywhere, as a matter of fact. Thailand with the CBDC. Well, we'll give you some free cash, but you're going to have to spend it within like a couple mile radius of where you live.

And we're going to let you have a car, but you can't really use it to go anywhere, because you really need to stay in this 15-minute city. And oh, by the way, if you want to try to get outside of that zone, if we don't outright prohibit it, we will put oppressive fines on you. Well, it's okay. I'm rich, says Sadiq Khan and Elon Musk. They don't have to participate in saving the planet as they tell us this is all about. So again, one person says they seem to be weaponizing air pollution and climate change. you go you got it that's what you're doing you see they don't even need a virus for all this stuff so i put i don't know was that the title i put it

in the description the other day when i covered uh um the you know these cameras that the blade runners are taking down and stuff like that i called it ev for vendetta that's what he means. I'm just mad. Yeah, we see exactly what these sadistic con men are doing. And interestingly enough, the sadistic con, when he's got to run for mayor next year, he now has a negative favorability rating. There's 12% more people who dislike him than there are who like him. But that's not the case with his own party, with the Labor Party. The Labor Party, the socialists, love this stuff, just like the leftists love this stuff here in the U.S.

The Labor Party, he has a 29-point favorability average. There's 29% more people who, or 29 points more in terms of percentage, 62% like him, only 33% don't in the Labor Party. So there you go. That's no accountability for this stuff. By the way, there was a small temporary victory for one truck driver as a company. Noel Wilcox, 48, ran up fines of 11,500 pounds. I mean, we're talking maybe, what, $14,000?

For driving a company truck to and from a depot in northwest London. And it's because of these ultra-low emission zones. And so they have to pay up to 300 pounds a day in order to go in here, or they face, this news article says huge penalties. I'm sorry, 300, what's that, like 400 bucks or something? I think that's a huge penalty to pay. So I don't have any idea what the huge penalties are. If that's not a huge penalty, I don't know what the huge penalty is. But anyway, these things piled up. And so he refused to pay. And he took his appeal to a tribunal. You don't have trial by jury, right? At least he didn't just have a single judge, but it was a tribunal. They ruled in his favor and said that these signs were not authorized and lawful because

it didn't say anything. It just says you're entering a ultra-low emission zone. It didn't say, and you will be fined X amount of dollars if you enter this under these certain so you have to have all that stuff there was the bottom line. They don't make it clear about the charges and so they insisted that the signs were deemed lawful by the department of transport more than a decade ago and um but nevertheless uh he did that and he won and um his triumph is not binding on other courts but it could be referred to in other cases, according to Nick Freeman, the motoring lawyer known as Mr. Loophole. It's like the Saul Goodman of the UK.

You got one of these fines, but you better call Mr. Loophole. And so here's the final kicker with all this stuff. Uh, the sadistic con man, Sadiq Khan rides around London and a 300,000 pound armored. And I'm talking about the price tag, not how much it weighs. It's only 300,000 pounds, but I don't know. I don't not how much it weighs. It's only 300,000 pounds, but I don't know. I don't know how much it weighs. Yeah. I ought to repair the road every time he takes it out.

No, it's a 300,000 pounds currency, right? It's not what the price tag of his SUV is. And it's armored and everything. Some of the people refer to it as a James Bond car, but he doesn't, um, at least the taxpayers don't have to pay for this thing. That's a picture of the future, isn't it? You have these people riding around and they're hyper cars that cost 2 million, $3 million or whatever. Oh yeah. Put it on my tab. I don't care. And then we have in Orlando, uh, we have Orlando we have the proverbial short bus look at this

and there's the damage that you can see. And this, look at this bus. It's got this stupid face on it. It's absolutely amazing. And so, you know, I was talking over it, but, you know, these people get in this bus. It's free to ride, and it's there in Orlando. They call it the Swan System.

They ought to call it the Swan Song. Pull this up and show the still picture that they've got of this bus. Because it was just right there at the very end. People see the face that they put on this stupid thing. But they call it Beep. It's a joint venture of uh not even crony capitalism it's crony fascism folks between this company and the city of orlando paying for these things giving people free rides so if you want to be a little lab rat in one of these self-driving buses go ahead

it was deployed for two days before it crashed into a real bus that was there. And SWAN is what they call the system, short for Shuttling with Autonomous Navigation. It only has a trip of, it makes five stops on a one-mile loop. As they say, you had one job and you couldn't do that, right? You had one mile to go and you had fives and you couldn't even manage that. Yeah. So like I said, I was talking over that clip and they get in there and this one guy says, oh, cool. This is like the Jetsons, except it's like the end of the intro where he gets trapped on the treadmill and eats him alive. You know, that type of thing. Yeah. It's like the J of the intro where he gets trapped on the treadmill and eats him alive. You know, that type of thing.

Yeah. It's like the Jetsons. All right. Uh, this is, uh, this is the future. You know, we have met the future and, um, it is, it is, uh, not the way they portrayed it in the Jetsons. The program is pilot operated by local autonomous vehicle company called beep partnered with the central Florida regional transportation authority.

See PPP public private partnership. And, uh, they continue to PPP down your back and it's raining. Tesla. Meanwhile is bracing for its first self-driving disaster, uh, autopilot trial of a fatality.

This is somebody who was killed. This story has never been reported before until this lawsuit came out. This is something that was not publicly reported, surprisingly. Tesla is set to defend itself for the first time at trial against allegations that failure of its autopilot driver assistance feature led to death and what will likely be a major test of Musk's assertions about the technology. Look, the reason he added that stuff there was to give this futuristic Jetson persona to these battery-operated vehicles

so people didn't notice a lot of their downsides. And they had a lot more downsides when they first came out. Like any technology can be fixed over a period of time. But these things are being shoved down our throats. The big problem I've got with electric vehicles is the fact that government is going to coerce you and there's not going to be any alternatives. I don't care what people drive. I want them to drive. I don't want them doing the autonomous stuff. It's not anywhere close to being done, but look, uh, I don't care what anybody drives. Um, you know, if I did, I would try to get SUVs outlawed or something. Right. Cause I, I prefer a small car. It puts me at risk for everybody to have these cars that I can drive right over me with it. You know, I can see

the underside of their car pull up next to me. But that's just my personal choice. That's their personal choice. I'm not going to try to prohibit different transportation from people. But that's what the government is doing for the reasons that I mentioned. For control, for restricting your movement, for surveillance of you, and all these different things. And essentially to take away our liberty and freedom because that is so tied to our mobility, and to also push us into these cities. You have to remember, and I've talked about this in the past,

it was the CEO of Lyft, and it was maybe about seven or eight years ago that he wrote an op-ed piece. This guy, by training training is an urban planner. That tells you a lot. These urban planners, as he said, he said,

the city cities are the best invention of mankind. And the car is the worst invention of mankind. Why do they hate cars? Because the cars allow you to escape these things we call cities and nobody likes to live in cities. The only people who like cities are the urban planners and the politicians for the most part. I think Petula Clark liked downtown or something, you know. But, you know, for the most part, it's like, okay, we'll go there if we have to, to work. We'll go there to, you know, for entertainment entertainment or dinner or something like that, but I don't want to live there. And so everybody given the opportunity

chose to live in the suburbs. And these people hate that they want to force you into the cities. And not only that, but really get you under their thumb and force you into these little 15 minute zones. That's where these people are coming from. And so to sell all that stuff, he put in the self-driving cars and that is to essentially end all driving of cars. That's another attack on our mobility, but it's over and above the battery-operated electric vehicles. So he puts it there as kind of a sensational, sexy technology feature to put out there to sell it. But it's really another control mechanism on top of the other control mechanism of the electric car. So Tesla's facing two trials in quick succession with more to follow. The first one in mid-September in California is a civil lawsuit. And again,

this is a story that has not been made public before. Allegations that the autopilot system caused the owner, their Model 3, to suddenly veer off of a highway east of LA at a speed of 65 miles per hour, strike a palm tree, and burst into flames, all in the span of a couple of seconds. The 2019 crash, not previously reported, killed the owner, seriously injured his two passengers, including then eight-year-old boy who was disemboweled. Wow. Disemboweled but survived somehow. But I'm sure there are long-lasting implications from that. The lawsuit accuses Tesla of knowing that autopilot

and other safety things did not work and pushing them. Look, this going 65 miles an hour, they want to scale this up to replace truck drivers, right? And as they were doing some of the testing about a year or so ago, they had one of these self-driving semi-trucks. And it's not just electric semis. They want the self-driving technology on everything, every kind of. They know that they don't have the technology or the capability to use these electric semis yet, but they still want to put the self-driving stuff on the um on the diesel trucks that work and uh so this thing was going

65 miles an hour and they flipped it on the two guys who were testing it and it picked up from where it was where it thought it was previously and it does a hard turn at 65 miles an hour major accident but these guys survive and goes across the median and all this other kind of thing. I mean, this is how dangerous this stuff is. And they're running these experiments out there on all of us. We're all participating in this experiment, whether or not you volunteered to get into the cab of this thing. And the problem was with it, they switched it off when it was navigating through some parking lot or something. And when they switch it back on, it came back up thinking that was where it still was and it was about to execute a turn, a hard turn, and it did that even though it

was now on the highway somewhere completely different and now not just going through the parking lot, but going 65 miles an hour. Uh, so anyway, there's a second trial that's coming up in early October. So one in mid September, another one early October, a 2019 crash North of Miami where the owner's model three drove under the trailer of an 18 wheeler, big rig truck that had pulled into the road, uh, shearing off the Tesla's roof and killing the driver, which is really surprising in the sense, because, you go back to Jane Mansfield, when you get these semi-trucks, they've all got a bar that's down low.

Because they're higher up. Jane Mansfield, that same thing happened. She was a passenger in a car, and the person drove, hit the semi-truck at speed, and and went underneath it and it decapitated her. And so that was a high profile death of a celebrity. And they mandated that all semis have now a bar to prevent that from happening. So that's really surprising about that. They call it the Mansfield Bar. And so that is surprising.

Okay. We're going to take a quick break and, um, and we'll be right back. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Stop! Who would cross the bridge of death must answer these questions thee. Ere the other side he see. Ask me the questions, bridge-keeper. I am not afraid. What is your name? My name is Sir Lancelot of Camelot. What is your quest? To name is Sir Lancelot of Camelot. What is your quest?

To seek the Holy Grail. What is your favorite color? Blue. Right, off you go. Oh, thank you. Thank you very much. That's easy! Stop!

Who approacheth the bridge of death must answer me these questions three. The other side he see. Ask me the questions, bridge-keeper. I'm not afraid. What is your name? Sir Robin of Camelot. What is your quest? To seek the Holy Grail. What is the capital of Assyria? I don't know that.

Stop! What is your name? Sir Galahad of Camelot. What is your quest? Sir Galahad of Camelot. What is your quest? I seek the Grail. What is your favorite color? Blue. No.

Stop. What is your name? It is Arthur, King of the Britons. What is your quest? To seek the Holy Grail. What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? What do you mean? An African or European swallow?

I don't know that. Well, life imitates art, doesn't it? We now have a guy who is known as Dr. Death, standing at the Bridge of Doom. His name is Philip Nishi. Oh. I don't know if he's any relation. I think he spells it differently, but again, sometimes they play games with this when they translate it from one language to the other.

Anyway, he now has set up a suicide booth. And whoever approaches this suicide booth of death must first answer me these questions three. You have to answer three questions before you can commit suicide in the booth created by Dr. Nishik. And I guess he's watched Monty Python too much himself. I don't know what he'd come up with this thing. You've got to answer three questions before it kills you. You push a button and it floods the chamber with nitrogen. You die from oxygen, lack of oxygen.

And they say, well, you get disoriented and euphoric as you cross the bridge of doom to see what is on the other side. And then you lose consciousness and you die. And it quickly brings down the oxygen content from 21% to only 1% in about 30 seconds. And he's claiming that he's about to get authorization for this in Switzerland. The person will climb into the machine. They'll be asked three questions. Who are you?

What is your name? Where are you? And do you know what happens if you press this button? Well, you know, that's the question that we all have been looking at our entire life, if we're honest about this. What happens at the moment of death? When we cross that bridge of death, that bridge of doom, right? That is the existential question.

Many people spend their entire life and they never get an answer to that until it happened. And these people who are suicidal have not learned what happens when they die either. And they haven't, you know, they've, they've got issues with life that they need help with as well. So, by the way, just like in that Monty Python thing there, Dr. Nishi is about to be launched into the pit of doom as well if he doesn't realize it by asking people these questions and then suffocating them. He is standing as all of us are on the precipice of death, and he's going to have to answer to a higher authority. He's going to have to answer uh when to a higher authority he's gonna have to answer to god when he dies all of us do and so again you know that question

the third question uh you know do you know what happens when you push this button you know what is your name what is your quest and do you know what happens when you die? Every 90 minutes in the UK, and this is a story that came out of the UK, they picked up on it. Every 90 minutes, somebody commits suicide in the UK. Here's the key thing though. It's the biggest killer of people under the age of 35. More people in the UK commit suicide than die of cancer or car crashes. It's riskier than a Tesla self-driving car, which is, I've always regarded as a form of suicide. It was Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple Computer, said, I love my Tesla. It's great to drive, but don't use that self-driving mode. That thing is trying to kill you. Listen to him. He knows what he's talking about. Men are three times more likely than women to commit suicide. And so there

is a campaign launched by this paper called You're Not Alone. Well, you're not alone. And that's the key thing. We look everywhere. It's obvious. Creation speaks to us. And the more we actually do actual science, the more we see God's presence, whether we're talking about Maxwell's equations, you know,

Maxwell was a Christian, strong Christian. Newton was a strong Christian. They saw science as a way to discover what an intelligent, creative God had done. And they did. But we can look around us, even if we can't see DNA and understand that it is intelligently designed, and that the thing that does not unite us, as the evolutionists say, what unites us is our skeletal patterns or whatever. That's not what unites us. That's not what relates us from one animal to the other. All animals and all plants have DNA, And that's what these scientists are now messing with, to try to combine dissimilar types of animals as well as plants and animals together into these monsters they call chimera, because of the DNA that is there, the code that God has put in there. So we know that there

is a God. Everybody knows that if they're honest. The question is, as I said before, is God spoken? Tomorrow we're going to have a guest on the show who's going to talk to that. Has God spoken in the Bible. And he was a detective, an atheist. And he started looking at the Bible to disprove after his wife became a Christian. And so he's a cold case detective. So he takes murder cases that had long since disappeared. Nobody was still alive. All you have to go on is what they wrote. And he applied those tactics to the Bible. And so he's going to be our guest tomorrow. We're going to talk about that because I really like what he has to say. And I think people need to understand that God has spoken in the Bible.

And what he's told us is what is going to happen when you push that button or if something else happens to you, you don't commit suicide, but you die suddenly. Tomorrow, even later today, is not promised to any of us. And if you understand that this is what God said, he says we all rebelled against him. The way Isaiah puts it, he says, each of us has turned his own way.

What do we do about that? You know, it's not just how this whole earth was cursed, as we were talking about earlier. He said each of us has rebelled. Each of us has turned his own way. So what do we do? Do we do really good stuff to make up for it? No, our righteousness, said Isaiah, is like filthy rags. But God has provided a sacrifice like he provided a sacrifice for Abraham.

And that is what we need to take hold of to get forgiveness, to have eternal life, and to have a better life now. To understand your position before God will give you a kind of contentment and joy, even under bad circumstances. You know, happiness is just what happens to you. But joy, is if you understand the bigger perspective, you can still endure bad circumstances,

bad things that happen to you, because you have this hope. And's not well i certainly hope so but i don't really you know it's not that kind of hope it's a confident expectation of what is going to happen so uh it is sad to see how many people turn to suicide and how this guy who has a fascination for death uh really does not understand what he's doing. This whole thing about nitrogen is coming up in multiple ways. There's also talk about it in multiple states, in Alabama and in Ohio. They've executed people with a variety of different things. We've tried hanging, firing squads, electrocution. That was particularly heinous.

And lethal injection. These things have gone wrong in one way or the other. So now they're looking at this nitrogen thing, just like this guy with a suicide pod. Alabama has authorized nitrogen hypoxia. That's what they call it when they give you only nitrogen. They authorized that in 2018. They had a shortage of lethal injection drugs. Well, we shouldn't have a shortage of that anymore after the Trump shots. I mean, he's created, Donald Trump created massive numbers of lethal injections. The only thing is you have to make sure that you get one of the doses that's got the one of the lots that has a high dose in it you know they can kill you pretty quickly uh and they said they didn't have

enough of a lethal injection to kill prisoners that they had sentenced they don't have that many people on death row i mean certainly even if they don't have the trump shots i'm sure they could find many other pharmaceutical drugs that would do the trick. Don't you think we report on this all the time about how big pharma is killing people and they don't repent of their murders either. They get, they become the richest,

most powerful people on earth doing this kind of stuff, but nobody ever gives them the death penalty. Nobody ever gives Trump the death penalty for the people that he's killed or Biden. Uh, no, as a matter of fact, you know, the only issue with any of these pharmaceutical drugs is just the dosage. Get the dosage, right? You're fine. We've got more than enough pharmaceutical drugs to kill all the people on death row everywhere. They don't have to worry about the nitrogen stuff, but they are. And, uh, because of a shortage of drugs used to carry out lethal injections,

they said they did this. No state in the country has yet executed a person using nitrogen hypoxia. Alabama is in no position to experiment with a completely unproven and unused method for executing somebody, said a senior attorney with the Equal Justice Initiative. I don't have a problem, as I've said before, with a death penalty. I have a problem with our justice system knowing who deserves it. That's the problem I have with it. We do have people who have admitted to it. And, you know, in that particular case, yeah, I mean, there's certain circumstances where it is very clear, but I think that's why you need to have a lot of different checks and balances with this. The ability for governors to overrule a court case because I have real issues with our justice system. Alabama attempted to execute Smith by lethal injection, this particular guy, last year. But they called off the execution because of problems inserting an IV into his veins.

Well, that's not a problem. Just call Fauci. He's our Dr. Death, isn't he? Yeah, he's got no problem. This little prick. He knows how to inject people all over the place, doesn't he? Isn't he an expert on that? Anyway, what was really strange about this was this guy who was on death row,

one of two men convicted in a 1988 murder for hire. It was a preacher, a preacher who hired these two guys to kill his wife. He paid them $1,000 each to kill his wife, and it was a real heinous crime. It was not a clean execution.

They stabbed her many, many times. And the reason that this pastor did it was because he was heavily in debt and he wanted the insurance money. Wow. You know, what is it? The root of all evil? The love of money, isn't it? This is the pastor.

But stand up there and talk to people about that. And he's completely ruled by the love of money. So much so that he paid these guys to kill his wife. A week after she was murdered, not clear whether or not it was remorse as to what he had done or the fact that the police were getting suspicious of him. He committed suicide. So that leaves the two murderers.

One of them has already been executed back in 2010. But this other guy has been under a death sentence for 35 years. And, you know, but the thing that was so amazing about this to me i saw the story because of the nitrogen stuff i thought you know all these stories about killing people in nitrogen uh and then when i looked at the details of it i thought wow this guy this pastor nothing is a better example of how of the difference between somebody who professes to be a Christian and somebody who possesses Christ, right? And Jesus will say to people like that, depart from me, I never knew you.

Oh, I knew you once. No, no, I never knew you. And, you know, we have a lot of pastors, guys who make tens of millions of dollars a year, driven by the love of money. You'll see these people, their good news, their gospel is a prosperity gospel. You too can love money like I do. You too can serve money as I do, right? That's their message to everybody. And just like this Dr. Death in Switzerland,

these people are storing up God's wrath. Just amazing to see that. You know, people like Joel Osteen, for example, put a name on it. But there's many people like that. Very famous. And then that brings us to murder. And I think there is a big pharma connection in this Jacksonville Dollar General shooting. Yes, there was a lot of hate involved in this. The guy who just shot three black people that he didn't know all he knew about them was that they were black uh he had a rifle that had swastikas all over it so yeah there was

a lot of uh hate involved in this and it's premeditated but there's something else here besides just guns and swastikas that people need to take a look at. And every time I see one of these shootings, I try to see if there was some kind of history of mental illness. And with this guy, there was. It was actually involuntarily committed under the Baker Act in Florida, which is a way that they have of committing people involuntarily. And the question is then, why was he allowed to own guns after this had happened? But there's another aspect of this

as well. He was put on medication. The only paper that I saw, some of the papers reported that he'd had a history of mental illness. Some of the papers reported that he had been committed involuntarily. The only place that I saw New York Post had the fact they talked to friends and they said, yeah, he was on medication and he stopped taking that medication the last several days. What do they give to people that drives them to murder and suicide, SSRIs. And if you stop taking those SSRIs, that can turn you into a crazed killer. It's absolutely true. And you can be perfectly, they said, look, he's perfectly rational. He's doing all this stuff.

He knows what he's doing. Well, that is one of the things about the SSRI stuff. Some of the people who've been under the influence, once they are, if they're subdued and they survive the episode, they may not have any recollection of it, but they act perfectly rationally at the time. Nobody wants to talk about that aspect of this. He sent a manifesto, by the way, and a suicide note. He had a suicide note and a manifesto. Do you think they're going to publicize that? You know, they've kept this manifesto from the tranny killer in Nashville.

They've kept that under wraps. But I kind of suspect that they're going to put this guy's manifesto out there. There's going to be a lot of racist ranting and things like that. I suspect they're going to put that out. They don't want to put out the anti-Christian rantings of this transgender killer in Nashville, but they'll put out the racist rantings of this Nazi killer in Jacksonville. Ron DeSantis went to this as governor there in Jacksonville. He said this shooting was based on the manifesto that they discovered from the scumbag who did this was racially motivated. He was targeting people based on race. That's totally unacceptable.

This guy killed himself rather than face the music and accept responsibility for his actions. He took the coward's way out. And we condemn what happened in the strongest possible terms. He was booed by people who were there. But again, this one person said, a neighbor who was there, said, from what I understand, he was on medication, and for some reason he got off of it probably a few days

or a couple of days ahead of that, and he snapped. We've seen this over and over again with SSRIs. Nobody will talk about that. Nobody will talk about that. They'll talk about his hate aspect, the race aspect. They'll talk about the guns, but they won't talk about the SSRIs. We've had, again, the question needs to be asked, and RFK Jr. asked this question, and good for him for saying that.

He said, people, he's the same age as me, he said, we used to have people bring their guns to school and practice hunting and target shooting and ROTC and things like that. But he said, we didn't have shootings like this. What has changed? Well, what has changed is the SSRI stuff. That's a big part of it. People need to understand the guns have been around for a long time. We've had crazy people around for a long time. We haven't seen this kind of heinous action. And people need to look at the SSRIs may not be a hundred percent of the problem, but it sure would be a big part of it. I'm absolutely certain. He was just completely irrational, but he was a hundred percent lucid. He knew what he was doing. Uh, said the sheriff

who was there. And, um, uh, again, he was involuntarily institutionalized. The sheriff said there was no flag that could have come up to stop him from purchasing those guns. Really? It's always the person who is dangerous. The person who is going to be using the guns could also use a car, could use, as we have seen in the past, use sticks, hatchets, hands, bare hands, any of this kind of stuff. He said, there's the difficulty when a person grabs a gun with hateful intentions,

it's difficult to stop that from happening. Well, again, nobody's going to take a look at the SSRIs. And I think that's a big part of the story right here. But let me just say this. He said, nobody's going to protect you from this, right? Here's one of the lessons that people should learn. He did this on the anniversary of an event that happened, the 63rd anniversary of Jacksonville's, that's cities, infamous Axe Handle Sunday. They had 200 Ku Klux Klan members armed with bats and with axe handles. They attacked black people who were protesting about being barred from a white-owned business.

Okay? So the sheriff needs to, and people need to understand that law enforcement is not going to protect you. Because what did law enforcement do on that day? As bad as that was, 200 KKK guys there with axe handles and baseball bats beating the black people, the police stood by. The police stood by and refused to intervene until a black street gang came to the defense of the protesters. They stopped it. Then the police arrested the black people who stopped it.

So you're on your own. The police are going to lock you in when there's a fire. They're going to keep you from getting supplies when there's a fire or other things like that, or even getting food, being able to go back and forth to your home when there's a natural disaster, when you have a group of people coming after you to harm you. And it doesn't matter if it's white on black or if it's black on white, as we have seen in these various riots, even going back to the Rodney King stuff. The police are not going to help you.

You have to be there to help yourself it's one of the reasons why we need to not take away guns we need to focus on the SSRIs we will be right back Decoding decoding the mainstream propaganda it's the david knight show well travis tells me as early as 1893 a scottish playwright named william archer uh i've never read any of his stuff.

I don't think I would want to look at his plays because what he said was he thought the future would have suicide booths on every street corner where people might walk in and kill themselves. He thought this would be a good thing. Why? Because they just saw one of his plays? That is, again, you know, this is a guy who is looking at life from a deep well of despair himself. We look at something like this. On Rockfin, Mr. Goldfold, thank you very much for the tip. He says, hello, Mr. Knight, I represent the estate of King Solomon, cease and desist.

I'm not sure what that represents. I don't know. Is it because of the abortion stuff when I'm talking about splitting the baby? I don't know. But thank you. I appreciate the tip. Ms. Moody. Thank you very much. Mrs. Moody, thank you very much.

I appreciate that very much. Thank you. Rocking Bart Bedenfield says, After serving 30 great years in LA law enforcement, I retired four years ago and had time to watch your shows. Sad you hate the police so much. No longer will I be watching. Well, if you watch my shows, you know, I don't hate the police, but I hate what some of the police do. And I hate the fact that they're given legal immunity. So if you don't want to watch my show, maybe you should spend some time watching the police and see what they do. I don't spend a lot of time talking about it.

But I think what I said today, I stand by that a thousand percent. Those people need to be put in jail. They have blood on their hands. They're as bad as the people who lit the fires, the arsonists, these cops who are stopping people. I will make no excuse for these people. You don't get a pass because you get a uniform, okay? Following orders didn't work in Nuremberg, and it shouldn't work now either. No pass for those people. They need to be held accountable like everybody else. You don't get special treatment. Sorry. Sorry. Talk to Frank Serpico about it. Talk to Adrian Schoolcraft. Since you're not going to be watching my program, take the time to look up those stories. Once you find out what real cops do, real cops want to get the bad people out of the organizations as Frank Serpico said every organization has bad

people in it and the question is is the organization going to purge those people or not they're not interested in purging the cops in Hawaii they're not interested in purging the cops there in British Columbia and many other places. And that's why we need to talk about this. So, anyway. This is from another listener here who says, this listener says, I know that Trump did a lot of terrible things, and I agree with the whole scandemic thing,

but they want me to like Trump better. Or maybe they want me to not like Biden even more than I dislike Biden right now. I think, you know, Trump did a lot of terrible things. I agree regarding the whole scandemic, but please follow Pepe's grandma on Twitter and see the information that she's releasing involving Brookings and Newland. Well, look, as far as I'm concerned, this stuff is all Game of Thrones stuff. We know about Victoria Newland. We know how she was involved in the Ukraine thing. And I reported back in 2015, 16, where they were coming after Trump for the Russiagate

lies. And those are lies. I defended him against those lies. And those are lies. I defended them against those lies. And we pointed out, and I interviewed many people who were from Ukraine who said, look, Victoria Nuland and the DNC people, we have Alexandria Chalupa, many other people like that, coming here all the time, coming here during the election campaign, talking about how they were going to come after Trump and how they were going to come after Trump after the election. That stuff goes back a long time.

The Obama and Biden administration, again, using Ukraine. Look at how many people were there, Vindman and other people with a Ukrainian background. That place is a cesspool. Even Bill Gates said Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries on earth or the most corrupt country on earth. And it's the Democrats who are knee deep in all that corruption. Look, I understand all that stuff, but that doesn't buy Trump an excuse for any of the stuff that he did. Trump is not our counterpart to evil. Trump himself is evil. If you look at what he did, Trump himself pitted himself against our country. Trump was a fifth column for the globalist. Trust him. It's

4D chess. You can trust Trump. See, he says all this stuff about how much he hates the globalists and the globalists hate him as well. Look, they hate him because they know that if he becomes president, he's coming after them as well. This is like who gets to be president and take revenge on their political enemies. That's what America has turned into. That's what the presidential race has turned into. And you shouldn't buy into that. That is a path for us to get into a civil war.

And I've heard Trump say all kinds of stuff. I've heard Trump, when he was campaigning, talking about the truth that we were lied into the Iraqi war over lies about weapons of mass destruction. Where do we get those lies? From the person that he put in charge of the CIA, Gina Haspel. She tortured people to get those lies. Then she covered up the torture. Then he promoted her. He promoted her. He said, we got to get out of NATO. We're not doing, you know, or we got to reduce our footprint in NATO. But he did nothing about that. Just like he did nothing

about the border. It's not enough to talk about stuff. You know, you can talk about stuff when you're a candidate. Fine. These are your issues. I agree with your issues. I agree with your positions. Let's give this person a chance. Julian Assange said the same thing. He said, we know that Hillary Clinton is a criminal and a mass murderer and a warmonger. We don't know about Trump. We'll find out, you know, let's give him a chance. Well, now we know about Trump as well.

Once they are in office, uh, you, it doesn't really matter what they say anymore. You look at their record. As far as I'm concerned, Trump's record, as well as Biden's record, ought to put them in jail. As a matter of fact, as Trump is out there saying, demanding that Biden be investigated and that he be put in jail because of what he did to him, CNN analyst says, you know, if the GOP impeaches Biden, this could juice Biden's 2024 run. In other words, it could do the same thing for Joe Biden that all the indictments have done for Trump.

What a sad state of affairs that the more of a thug, the more of a criminal that you are in this country, the more people like you. Take a look at this clip here. This is a meme going around. The Trump mugshot where he's got his head tilting down and he's staring. The Kubrick stare is one of director Stanley Kubrick's most recognizable directorial techniques as a method of shot composition where a character stares at the camera with a forward tilt to convey to the audience that they are at the peak of their derangement. And so he shows the character from Clockwork Orange.

He shows Jack Nicholson. At the peak of his derangement. And The Shining. And then he shows. I can't remember that guy's. The actor's name. I don't know if we have whatever. But in full metal jacket

and then Trump all for them have that same stare. So I guess, you know, if we indict Biden, uh, maybe, you know, Biden could give us the Kubrick square stare and everybody would love it. And, uh, you know, it's, uh, that Stanley Kubrick took that to the bank and, uh, so did Trump, uh, and, and all this. So, uh, it is, uh, that that's where we are as a country. We want people like that. We love that. Uh, there's an interesting article from the lawyer on Brownstone.

His name is Michael Lesher. He said, here's what the real Trump, here's what the real trump here's what the real problem with the trump indictment is uh and he quotes uh you know from henry vi shakespeare's play first thing we do is kill all the lawyers he says and shakespeare is telling dick the butcher is a notorious bully and when he calls for the murder of lawyers, he's playing a leading role in a revolt against the legitimate king. And so Justice John Paul Stevens probably got it right when he said in a 1985 opinion, interpreted the line as an indirect defense of the legal profession. He said Shakespeare insightfully realized that disposing of lawyers is a step

in the right direction of a totalitarian form of government. And so this lawyer says, well, so it is. And Stevens also realized that you don't actually have to kill all the lawyers in order to dispose of them, at least of all when the bulk of the profession appears more than happy to dispose of itself. And what he does is he looks at these tactics that are involved, especially in this latest indictment, you know, 19 people, most of them Trump lawyers. And we've talked about this, how the strategy of Fannie is to come after these lawyers, and hopefully they're going to get enough people there, and you bring enough charges against them, they'll cut a deal with the prosecutor,

and they'll turn on Trump. That's clearly what Fannie is trying to do. And then Trump has foolishly decided that he's only going to pay for his defense, and he's not going to help any of these people. That's going to make it easier for her to do that. It should make it easier for her that one guy there, the person who was running previously, Black Voices for Trump, doesn't have enough money even for a lawyer, and he doesn't have enough money even for bail. And so he's sitting in that horrendous jail in Atlanta. I don't know if

he's got anything that, um, you know, he could contribute with this, but certainly, um, after Trump makes $7 million in two days, they made over 4 million the first day. And he won't come up with a small amount of money to put up to bail this guy out. He won't help him with legal fees. He's going to let this guy twist in the wind and other people around him as well. But then there's another aspect of it, and that is what this guy is talking about. He says this is a breathtakingly simple way to make lawyers vanish.

You just send them to jail, along with their clients, for advocating a legal theory which the Democrat Party disapproves of. And yes, that is what this racketeering allegation is really about. You made arguments that we don't approve of. Wow. The felonies of which Trump and his associates stand accused in Fulton County, Georgia, are the challenges that they made to the results of the 2020 presidential election. No bribes, no hidden skullduggery, no usurpation of political office for private gain, no the alleged quote-unquote conspiracy. It's all about Trump's unsuccessful

efforts to persuade officials that the election results were marred by irregularities and should not be certified as a matter of law. That's what they did. Why is that illegal? Right? If they got bad arguments, they lose the case. You know, the big scandal of the Trump election thing is that for the most part, his lawyers didn't do anything.

For the most part, he kept all the money. And even when the lawyers did do something, he didn't do anything for the most part he kept all the money and even when the lawyers did do something he didn't pay their bills and now he's not helping them with this either the important point about this indictment that says the writer at brownstone is that the lawyers are being charged with felonies for doing legal work and he as we look at this, this is a cynical move, of course, to get Trump. It sets very bad precedents. And people are going to see all of this and continue, people, this is going to be, this is already making, that's why he's raising so much money. People see these cynical moves.

They get ever more cynical and tribal in response to all of this. And it's being used to push us into a civil war in the same way that Trump was used to put us into lockdown and to do these vaccines and to do all these other, this litany of real crimes that nobody is being charged with because they all had a hand in it. It's like an Agatha Christie novel where, as they're recounting, everybody seemed to be guilty of this thing.

And yes, at the end, they go back and one by one, they show that they all were there to kill this person. They all took a turn at stabbing the person, handing the knife to somebody else and stabbing it. That's what the Republicans and the Democrats both did to us all, to our Constitution, to our society, to our God-given rights. They all did that in 2020. They all did that. I really wish somebody in the business would tell Ms. Fannie, he says,

if you make it a felony to offer unsuccessful legal arguments, you make it virtually impossible to offer original legal arguments at all. But then I've often wished that the mainstream media had the backbone to speak out against the prosecution of Julian Assange on the grounds that he's locked up for doing what investigative journalists do and it exactly what that's about. And I've talked about that, even though, especially, especially the mainstream media, uh, they tow the line for their CIA masters as all this stuff was being done to

Julian Assange. They had the nerve to make a movie about the Pentagon Papers. And it had Tom Hanks in it and Meryl Streep. What was the name of that? Was it called The Post, I think, or something like that?

But it was about the Pentagon Papers. You know, Daniel Ellsberg's just died recently. And in it, you know, they make heroes out of them for refusing to kowtow to the censorship of the government. They were given information from Daniel Ellsberg. The government, for a while, pursued Ellsberg and tried—yeah, it is The Post.

Meryl Streep, Tom Hanks. So the government prosecuted Daniel Ellsberg, but they fell on a technicality if they really wanted to put him in jail. I don't know. I mean, that's another. Other people look at this and say, well, the government wanted this information out there. But the Washington Post and the New York Times said,

we have the right, if this information is given to us, to publish it. And that's basically what Julian Assange is doing. That's why they have the false accusations that he was the one who grabbed the information. That's the prevarication that they're using to come after Julian Assange. And remember who came after Julian Assange? It was Bill Barr.

Bill Barr, shortly after Trump brought this CIA Bush senior accomplice into his administration, just a couple of months after that, if it was even that long, Bill Barr came after Julian Assange, has been after him ever since. And so what he's saying here, he said, I've looked at this with the journalistic profession and how they're not defending Julian Assange for doing investigative journalism. He says, if you don't defend him,

there won't be any investigative journalism. They can criminalize anything and everything. Again, going back to the beginning of the program, they don't want you to see anything they did. And they don't want you to see the criminal actions that they did in Hawaii. So they're putting up a big black curtain there. So you can't get more upset about what has happened to the place, but especially, I think, about the bodies that are going to be taken out there. Our popular journalists clearly don't give a hoot about the destruction of journalism. And so he says, and so now I'm seeing the same thing from lawyers. He said, the real news is the cowardice of the nation's lawyers here in this Georgia trial. They should be rising up in mass to denounce this indictment,

just as all reporters and their editors should be shouting from the rooftops in support of Julian Assange. You peel away the flatulent rhetoric and the tedious repetition of details, and what is left of the indictment is the claim that Trump and his lawyers are criminals because, and only because, they offered the government and the courts an unpersuasive legal theory for challenging the outcome of the presidential election in 2020. If they can be convicted for that, then the rule of law in the U.S. political system is at an end. It's that simple, and it's that serious. And so he says, mind you, I don't agree with any of these arguments

from any of these lawyers. Kenneth, I want to say Cheesebro, but I think it was Chezbro or something like that. John Eastman, Giuliani, he said their case was a makeshift assortment of dubious legal theories and sketchy facts, and I'm not surprised that it failed. In fact, I wouldn't have been surprised if Trump and company had been required to pay legal fees of their adversaries in court, a remedy that the law provides when lawyers' arguments are more creative than credible. And I've said the same thing about the people, the January the 6ers people and stuff like that.

People who got lied into showing up on January the 6th. They should be suing Trump. Nobody does. They give him more money. And so if you want to know whether this is purely political, just take a look at the trial date that they've set for this January the 6th trial. Set it the day before super tuesday the day before super tuesday this is clearly everybody sees what is happening with this there's no question about it as i said everybody is getting more and more cynical about the system and more and more polarized and tribal.

It's a very dangerous system, circumstance that we're in right now. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back with Bradley Dean with the Sons of Liberty. So let's play the break here about the Sons of Liberty. Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.

Tomorrow, it will be something else. ¶¶ liberty it's your move you're're listening to The David Knight Show. Right, and we're still connecting to Get Bradley. I think you're still working on it. Oh, okay, he's going to be on in a half hour. Okay, let me say thank you to some of the people who have mailed in checks. And we have not updated the the gas gauge to reflect this it's down still pretty low but you know I just don't want to obsess about that so I haven't looked at too much but let's we will we'll get that taken care

of today and and so these are things that came in over the weekend. Thank you very much to Michael O, to Brian and Hannah V, to Lloyd P, Bradley and Connie C, John W, Dale L, Jackie and Fred U, Matthew

S, Jeff and Janine K, Phillip M, Susan L, Jim D, Kelly M., and Debbie H. Thank you very much. And, oh, and there's a couple more here, too. Rob 42 in New Jersey, Raymond and Karen, Ronald C., and Ty S. Thank you very much. And there was a listener in Alaska who wished to remain anonymous as well.

So thank you to all of you. Uh, thank you to Sandy for the homemade pumpkin and to, uh, for love of the road. Who said Trump doll? He said, he'd sent a thing, said, I've got to get a dog toy. That's going to be coming to you. We'd forgotten about that. And we're opening this thing up and it's like, Whoa, what is this? And it's like, it's got orange hair.

I said, what is this? Like a voodoo doll for, for Trump or something. And it's like whoa what is this and it's like it's got orange hair i said what is this like a voodoo doll for for trump or something it's like no it's a dog toy trump dog toy i guess uh you could throw trump to the dogs which i do on a regular basis anyway and then this uh this uh trump 2024 and um except it has a dash between the 20 and the 24 and it says, uh, 20 to 24 years in prison. Yeah. Uh, and Biden as well, Trump Biden, 20 to 24 years in prison for what they have done to us in 2020. Uh, absolutely the case. Um, the, um, uh, I just had this here. Um I hit this and lost my place. I had some information. Let's talk about RFK Jr. While we're waiting for our guest to join us.

You know, he had sued to get YouTube to stop censorship. And the judges now shut that down in California. Truly is outrageous, isn't it? And again, I have for the longest period of time, they're not really saying it anymore at conservative and libertarian think tanks. They used to always say, well, you know, I don't like what they're doing, but they own it so they can do whatever they want to with it. Well, that's not the case. And for two reasons. And I said from the very beginning, well, it is the public square by default. It is the de facto public square.

And we have court cases when they got it right back in 1946. It was a company-owned town. It was a coal town. It was a Seventh-day Adventist who was handing out religious tracts in the town square. And they said, you can't do that. We don't like that. And that person fought them all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said, even if the town square is privately owned, you can't shut down free speech.

And that is truly what is happening here. It is privately owned digital town square. That's the only thing that's different. And we've had subsequent court decisions where some people, some lawyers will say, well, that's been overturned by later court decisions. Well, the principle is right, number one. Number two, it hasn't been overturned. I had this argument back and forth with Robert Barnes when I was at InfoWars. And, you know, he would bring up the cases of people who would go into shopping malls and try to get on their soapbox or whatever, and they'd get thrown out.

I said a shopping mall is not the public square. A shopping mall is retail space, wherever you are in a shopping mall. It's no different if you get out into the area where people are walking. They've got kiosks out there as well. It's the same as going into, I'm trying to think of a store that hasn't gone out of business that I know now. It's been such a long time since I, let's say Sears.

I know they're out of business. It's the same as going into Sears and setting up a soapbox and getting up there and starting to talk about, rant about whatever it is, about politics or religion or whatever you want to do. You don't have the right to do that. That's not the public square.

And a shopping mall is not the public square. But YouTube is, and Twitter is. And Jack Dorsey said that eight times under oath. And still they were censoring people. And still he had the other people doing that. But since then, we've now had, because of the Twitter files, we've now had documentation that they were actively conspiring with the government, that the government was telling them who to shut down.

This makes it even more incriminating. It takes away, you know, we have enough, the fact that it is the de facto public square, but the fact that the government is telling them who to censor and that they're doing exactly what the government is doing. Censorship is coming from the government. As I said for the longest time, it's the iron fist of government with a velvet glove of private ownership. And that is really what is true. And so, you know, they're censoring politicians that they don't like. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has rejected a

request by a Democrat primary candidate for office, RFK Jr., for a temporary restraining order to prevent Google-owned YouTube from censoring his content. But the judge sides with censorship. Truly amazing. Now, I want to thank Gail for a very long letter that she wrote in defense of RFK Jr. And, um, she says, I totally disagree with you on what you wrote about RFK Jr. Uh, thanks in advance for reading this and so forth. And, and she said, I don't think he's got the same views about censorship that he did three years ago. Uh, I, I don't think he's got the same views about censorship that he did three years ago. I don't know. She says his book, his interviews, and this lawsuit that I just talked about, they all say that he doesn't support censorship anymore. But the climate change example that I talked about from the very beginning, I said it caused me a great deal of concern. And when he

finally was asked a question, it took a very long time for anybody to ask him a question about that. And when he did get the question, I feel like his answer was disingenuous. I felt like it was a lie. Because what he said was, you know, in the original context, and I think it was, um, um, I can't remember the guy's name now interviewed him several times. Um, but, um, anyway, um, what he said in that context was, he said the Koch brothers, because of their promotion of fossil fuels that he didn't like needed to be locked up. He said they need to get three hots and a cot. In other words, three hot meals and a cot to sleep on and lock them away in jail.

Now, when he was asked about that, he said, no, I was talking about a death sentence for a corporation. That's not true. You're not going to put a corporation, you're going to dissolve. And I agreed with that. I said, well, that's a good idea, but that's not what was happening there. I agree with them that if you got fraudulent corporations and I would put corporations like Pfizer and Moderna and most of these pharmaceutical companies and many of the biggest banks who've had one criminal conviction

after the other, I think that those companies ought to be disbanded, not just given a fine. I mean, when you look at the fines that have been given to big banks like HSBC and others like that, it's a slap on the wrist. Even if you give them billion-dollar fines or a couple of billion-dollar fines based on the money that they were able to make off of that crime, they made the crime pay. I mean, if you're going to rob a bank and you get a million dollars and you get to keep the million dollars and you do, let's say 10 years, you know, a lot of people say, okay, well that's a hundred thousand dollars a year. That's, that's okay. I'll do it again or whatever, you know, if I got the time to serve for it. Uh, but, um, you know, the, uh, I think it's the right thing. I agree with him on giving the death penalty to corporations. Corporations are

an abstraction. They're not people. Uh, it. It's an artificially created entity created by the government. And so I don't have any problem with taking out those corrupt organizations and dissolving them, taking their assets and all the rest of this stuff. But that's not what he was talking about when he said, you know, three hots and a cot. He was talking about arresting the people and putting them away because he disagreed with them on climate change. She goes on to say he's made it clear that he's not going to ban real meat stoves, the sun, or take farmers' land from them. He even spoke out on behalf of the Netherlands farmers. The problem I have is that he is, I believe he's earnest in his belief about climate issue. And I think if you seriously believe that stuff, then you are open to, if you're that naive,

and I think it's naivete, again, we're the same age. I've had, I've watched this climate thing from the very beginning. And I am just absolutely, I understand kids who have been completely and thoroughly brainwashed K through 12 in college buying into this stuff. But somebody who's my age and the same age as RFK Jr., people who are our age who saw this stuff going through there and who have seen 50 years of failed alarmist predictions, if you're still buying into this stuff, that's a big issue about your judgment. That's a big condemnation of your ability to judge truth from facts.

And if you're still on this, climate change is one of the things that's going to be used to take us down. The issue that I have, the fundamental issue I have with RFK Jr. is that he sees government as a solution to our problems. And I've said many times in the past, just as we're talking about the censorship, right? The Cato Institute, Reason Magazine, Heritage Foundation, which is conservative,

these conservative and libertarian organizations think that corporations can do no wrong and that government can do no right. A traditional Democrat like RFK Jr. thinks that corporations can do nothing right and government can do nothing wrong. Both of those positions, I think, are incredibly naive and dangerous. And what they fail to realize is how the two of them have merged. Now, RFK Jr. talks about the merger of corporations and government, but I still think he's going to be more of an FDR type of Democrat, which I still think is very dangerous. It's not the same, as she points out, he's not the same as the current Democrats who have gone on to become full totalitarian communists. But I think an FDR Democrat is dangerous enough. But over and above

that, I'm not going to support any of these people because you can't believe anything that any of them say. They won't follow through on it. And even when they have done something and they got a record, they lie about it, just like Trump is lying about what he did in 2020 and Biden is lying about what he did. Biden has got this ridiculous thing that he just put out where he's standing next to a whiteboard with a, um, like a marker in his hand, like he's going to write on it, but the whiteboard is there for them just to add graphics about what he is reading off of the teleprompter. And he can't do that very well either. But it's so incredibly phony. Why stand there with, you know,

why create this phony thing about a whiteboard when you're not drawing on the whiteboard and when it's all obviously being, you know, they take all of it off and then throw the next thing up there. It's ridiculous. It's all just really bad acting and bad script writing. And these people say stuff that they have no intention of ever doing. And so I don't support anybody.

And I will support some of the things that they say about different issues. I support RFK Jr. in his lawsuit. I think he's got that exactly right. I've supported what he's had to say in his book. I think that's a very good book. I think the 12th chapter is excellent. You should read that to get a broader perspective of it. But I think he's also gone off the rail in terms of starting to focus people

on Wuhan and on the lab. Look, we need to shut down gain of function stuff, but let's not pretend that this was a virus pandemic. It was not a virus pandemic. It was not a virus pandemic. It was not a pandemic. To talk about Wuhan is to push out the idea that, at least at some level, that what they did was necessary but maybe misguided.

That's not what happened. It was not necessary and it was not misguided. It was planned. It was deliberate. It was premeditated. It was practiced for 20 years, and he knows that, so I don't understand why he's talking about the Wuhan lab stuff.

And then she talks about something else. Ramaswamy is a World Economic Forum young global leader, and a Soros Foundation paid for his education. Well, the Soros Foundation did pay for his education. The World Economic Forum put him up, and he had to sue them to get him to take his name down. They just saw

somebody that was successful. Let's, uh, let's add him to our stuff, but he has a lot of culpability besides that. Uh, you know, let's not throw stuff at him that,

um, you know, he doesn't deserve, but he deserves plenty of criticism for what he did with the Ohio pandemic response. He was on that team for DeWine and, um, you know,

he was pushing a surveillance plan thing that he was going to run himself. Nobody really wants to talk about that much. That is damning. The fact that he made his money as a pharmaceutical huckster, like Martin Skrelli, actually worked with Martin Skrelli, actually brought Martin Skrelli in to partner with him at one point in time. That's a condemning thing. His pushing of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. If you understand the role that those trade treaties, and they're treaties, they're not partnerships, but again, they call it a partnership because this is about public-private partnership. This is about a corporate global governance.

That's why they call these things partnerships and things like that. Because they're setting up a global government. They'll be like a multinational corporation. They'll still have the, you know, the political things there for you to assuage your fears about. But it's going to be globally governed by corporations. If he's going to push into that kind of stuff, I'm not going to support that. So again, you know, they're a mixed bag.

I think we should have the debates. I think RFK Jr. is right on many issues. I think he's wrong on many issues. And again, you know, he's, she's part of this.

She sends me, he's got a great speech. Great speeches are the trade of, uh, of candidates. Anybody can say anything. And, uh, you know, Trump had some great speeches when he ran in 2016 and great things that he was going to do, but you look at what they have done, uh, and what they're proposing to do. And, uh, so I'm very concerned about that in terms of Ramaswami Ramaswami had went on several programs on Sunday to try to capitalize on what a lot of people thought was a high-profile event with his debate performance and it's a performance again you know a gadfly. Uh, and so one of the ones that he went on with Chuck Todd,

uh, he said, okay, so, um, you've said in the debate that, uh, Trump was the best president we've had. And, uh, he didn't just say of the 21st century, um, best president we've had, I think. Um, but, um, maybe it was the 21st century. That's what it says in this article, but I thought he said the best president we've ever had. Um, but anyway, he says, so if he's the best president, why are you running against him? That was a great, a great question. Um, and, um, so, uh, he said, well, um, I, I believe I can take the America First agenda even further than Donald Trump did. Because I'm younger, that type of thing. But he's not going to criticize Trump because he's, again, he's angling to become famous.

He's angling to become a vice presidential pick for Trump. I think that's one of the things that explains his animosity towards Nikki Haley, because we all understand that's what Nikki Haley is running for as well. Anyway, he also tried to sidestep accusations that he called Trump a sore loser, and he actually did in his book. Todd quoted from his book that was published just last year, 11 months ago. He said, you wrote here, no one likes a sore loser. That's one of the worst victim complexes of all. He said, are you referring to Donald Trump? And he says, well, I referred in that chapter both to Stacey Abrams and to Donald Trump. And so then he confronted him with some more of his quotes. He said, the Republican Party seems to be moving toward the position that any race it wins are legitimate and any that it loses are stolen.

This is what Ramaswamy wrote 11 months ago. It's just the preferred conservative brand of victimhood, a knee-jerk kind of sore losing that is more common on playgrounds than to great republics. He's absolutely right about that. And he says, oh, Chuck, I stand by everything I said. That was a book where 11 of the 12 chapters were dedicated to a lot of left-wing victimhood in this country. But it would have been incomplete for me not to call out my own tribe. That's the problem, is that tribalism that we have in our country. And my point is,

I don't want to see this in terms of red versus blue. Uh, but again, he does see it as, um, or he did see it for what it was a sore loser. And you understand if you, uh, Ty Cobb, his former lawyer said, Trump is incapable of of acting except he's a deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting except in his own perceived interests or out of revenge. And so these people understand. It's one of the reasons why this has been weaponized to the extent that it has. But the Democrats understand that everything they do is making him more popular with his base, but it's also making him more unpopular with the independents.

And so they understand that they want to have somebody that they can defeat in the general election. And that's what is behind all this. And Trump is going full into this because he's making a lot of money out of this thing. Ramaswamy then made some interesting claims about what Mike Pence could have done on January the 6th. He was confronted with a question about whether or not he did not answer on the debate, whether or not he believed that Pence's actions on January the 6th were right.

He said, I would have done it very differently. I think that there was a historic opportunity that he missed to reunite this country in that window. What I would have said is, this is a moment for a true national consensus where there's two elements of what's required for a functioning democracy in America. One is secure elections, and the second is a peaceful transfer of power. When those things come into conflict, that's an opportunity for heroism. Here's what I would have said. We need single-day voting on election day. We need paper ballots. We need government-issued ID matching of the voter

file. And if we achieve that, then we have achieved victory, and we should not have any further complaint about election integrity. I agree with all of that stuff. And again, I'm glad that we have the political process so we can talk about things. Every one of the things that he said there are necessary. They're not completely sufficient, of course. People can cheat, but you reduce the cheating if you've got voter ID and you don't have a long voting period. I've talked many times about what happened in North Carolina. I have a friend of my brother-in-law's who went to vote. North Carolina's got one of, they used to have the longest period of voting.

I don't know if that's still true or not, but still one of the longest ones. And they have no picture ID. And so my brother-in-law's friend goes to vote on election day and they said, you've already voted. All you have to do is walk in there and give them a name and an address. He said, no, I haven't. He said, yes. And this other person at your address has voted. He says, that's my mom. She's been dead for several years. They say a lot of fraud like that is really happening. And he didn't want to report that to anybody. He didn't want to come on the show. He didn't want to make an issue of that in North Carolina.

So you hear the people in North Carolina, the Democrats are saying, well, we don't need to have voter ID. They say people who want you to prove your identity about everything. We don't need to have voter ID, but we don't have any cases where what happened to our friend. We don't have anything like that.

That's not happening here. So all of that, make it a holiday, have paper ballots, have IDs. That'd be great. You still need to watch the people who count it, right? So there's one or two more steps that have to be involved in there. But just simplify it. That would be a great deal. And so then Chuck Todd says, yeah, but what would you have done as Mike Pence?

And he said, so in my capacity as president of the Senate, I would have led through that level of reform. And then on that condition, I would have certified the election results, served it up to the president, Trump, then to sign that into law. And on January the 7th, declared the reelection campaign pursuant to a free and fair election. I think that was a missed opportunity. Well, you're not going to get an up or down vote on that in that kind of a circumstance. I mean, that is something of a fantasy. But again, to have the peaceful transference of power and elections that people trust that would be something that we ought to strive for and want to keep that in mind that what he's saying pence could have done that could not have been done at that point in time

but still we need to have um that there i mean the reason we talk about this stuff and the reason we talk about these campaigns the same reason we talk about these campaigns, the same reason we talk about the Constitution. The Constitution is not paid any attention to whatsoever, but we need to pay attention to it for a couple of reasons. First of all, we need to understand these people who have power over us typically don't have any authority because they violated their oath of the Constitution. That is a condition of their office. So first of all, they lack authority. We need to understand what the government at different levels have the authority to do in the first place,

and we need to understand when they're against that authority. So even though the Constitution has been voided, we're prohibited by law, it's been ripped to shreds, it's been burned, we still know what it said. And someday we need to restore it, as much of it as we can. And so the same thing applies with these elections. We talk about them for the same reason. And we look at what is actually happening with a candidate

that he is such a groveling sycophant to. Ramaswami or Pharma Swami is groveling to Trump on all this stuff because Trump doesn't want any of this stuff. Trump is looking at the new corruption that he piled on in 2020. We had all these different problems of extended voting periods and no IDs. And we had the voting machines that were vulnerable to manipulation, if not carefully controlled. All of these different things were there. And then Trump added another level of corruption, and that was the mail-out election. And even before you get to all of that, the very process that Ramaswamy was in, the idea of debates. Ballot access and debate access has

been denied for anybody that is outside of the Republican and Democrat party structures. That is a major, major, major issue of corrupted elections. It's one way that we've had censorship, and the censorship that we saw exercised by these corporations is the same kind of censorship that I saw exercised for the longest time by the people who are running the debates. You know, the same argument that they shut down RFK Jr. on with YouTube and Google. Well, this is privately owned. They would have the debates run by some organization that's privately owned and said, well, we'll determine who we want on the debates.

So if you've got three candidates who've gone through and met all the requirements to get on the ballot, we'll only have two of them. That is just like what we're seeing with YouTube. That's been around for a very long time. And it's exactly the same argument. Well, they're private. They can do whatever they want. Not when it comes to an election. But anyway, Nikki Haley, who is also running for vice president, I think, really got under his skin, and so now he's referring to her by her maiden name, her Indian name, Namrata. They called her Lying Namrata.

So this guy is really smooth. He's really slick. He's really cool. But you can get him ruffled, and she did. I think what you should do is you should call her Killer. Killer Haley. Killer Nikki or something. Because she is consistent.

She loves abortion, and she loves wars. She is consistent on that. She's consistently a killer. Well, our guest Bradley Dean is ready. And I just got a comment here from Mr. Goldfold, who explained what he was saying. He represents the estate of Solomon. He said, King Solomon wrote psalms.

He said, you were going to set psalms to music. Joke poorly timed after reference. Well, that's okay. I get it. Yeah, it was, um, actually his dad who wrote most of them, David, but, uh, you know, same thing if you're going to inherit the copyright to those things. Uh, so yeah, the copyright has expired. That is, uh, one of the other ways that they control speech, isn't it? To have these, uh, unending copyrights that are on

there. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back with Bradley Dean of Sons of Liberty. So let's play the other one here. We are the sons, yes we are the sons, the sons of liberty ¶¶ liberty it's your move you're listening to the david knight show all right and joining us now is bradley Sons of Liberty, and I think the website is sonsoflibertymedia.com, is it Bradley? Is that correct? That's right, sonsoflibertymedia and sonsoflibertyradio.com. get him on uh for the audience that doesn't know what he does we share a lot of common values uh politics and we see um christianity at the center of this and uh he has been involved i want to talk to him about the um uh the protests at target and uh subsequent to this we see not only is target taking a big hit as they've been pushing all this LGBT agenda. They now got a lawsuit from stockholders who said, hey, you're not, you got this environmental social governance stuff here.

You're not paying attention to what your real mission is, and that is to make money. And that is, I think, one way that these people are going to be punished. But of course, the other way that we can come after them is with boycotts tell us a little bit about what happened there uh where you live well back in june um early june actually we seen that target was doing what target does best and this isn't the first time they've done it by the way we've seen the corporate world gather together in this alliance and attack who we are. And it rightly reminds me of what John Adams rightly said, that the Constitution is only good for a moral and a religious people. It's wholly inadequate to the government of any other. And we see that they're using these groups that

want their rights that God never gave to go ahead and attack at will to upend the Constitution. Well, Target just happened to be one of them. And we noticed what was going on and how they were targeting the children once again. And we decided to stand up and do what we did. And that was to protest Target and basically call them out for their crimes being committed against innocent children throughout the country. And we got national attention because of it. We're going to continuously do it. Yeah. And of course, did any of the local officials do anything about that? Well, no.

As a matter of fact, I even met with the local prosecutor and the sheriff. And I showed him the laws that were being violated here. And I asked them why the law was not being enforced in bringing these individuals to justice. And they said that they did not want to bring national attention to themselves. How do you not want to bring national attention to yourselves on the behalf of your children? But I guess that's a little of what we got here in the state of Minnesota. Yeah. And I call these people dragons, you know, because we are serving the symbolic

thing of evil there instead of drag Queens. I think they're dragons and we have a similar situation here, Bradley. You know, we have had in, um, in Knoxville, one of the three big cities in, um, in Tennessee, uh, they had a, uh, a bunch of dragons with little kids and, uh, the local officials, all Republican for the most part said, well, there's nothing we can do about it. There's no law against that type of thing. It's like, there is a law against obscene public displays and things like that, especially with kids. There's a law against all of those things. They said, well, we can't do anything about it. So they passed a law, state law in Tennessee. The governor signed it. And then shortly afterwards, we had a federal district judge

who was appointed by Trump who said, no, that law is too broad. I'm not going to allow that to happen. It's like, it's broad because they're trying to think of all the different places where these people have done it. It wasn't overly broad in any sense, except to talk about the ways that it's being done. But that judge put an injunction and said, well, this cannot be enforced right now. I'm not really sure what the situation is legally with that, if that's being appealed by the state of Tennessee or not. But I do know

that now in smaller towns, and it's coming up close to where I live, and on this Saturday, there's going to be a bunch of dragons with kids. They're going to have them on stage, and they're inviting all ages and that sort of thing. And that's being put on in the city, uh, uh, city hall area. That's basically a building that's owned by the, the city of severe and they call it queer and severe. And, uh, they're saying, well, there's no law. We can't do anything about it, but it is still the principle that you're engaged in lewd displays with kids and that type of thing.

So I guess we'll be there to, uh, to film that over the weekend. I'm not sure, you know, what the status is going to be. Right now, there's a pressure campaign to try to stop this small town city from doing this because this stuff is coming from the bigger cities or pushing it into the smaller cities. Yeah. Well, if I can add to that, David, it's also interesting to note that in 16 states, it's still illegal to commit the act of sodomy. And what do we have?

Men dressing up as women that are aiming for children. It's also interesting to know it is a felony throughout the United States of America. It always has been, it always will be in the sight of God and in American statute, they're called crimes against nature. What's interesting is even going back to your first question, when I met with the sheriff and I met with the prosecutor here, I said, do you realize that when I do high school assemblies, because I've done 365 of them, public high schools in 25 different states, do you realize that if I took the information that they're trying to bring to the kids in these drag queen hours, as they call them, or if I was to take some of the content out of over 100 titles concerning the books that are being infiltrated into public schools, and I

shared with the kids during my lyceum the information that these individuals are getting away with sharing. If I did that in a public high school setting, I'd be charged immediately, and I'd be thrown in jail for a long time. I'd be thrown in prison as a pedophile. And so to suggest that the laws are not there, they're absolutely there. And what has to happen is the American people need to go back to the word of God and the Constitution and understand that if our said representatives are not going to enforce the laws, then we're going to hold them accountable to do so. And if they don't, we'll impeach them and we'll prosecute them as well. And this we've seen a mayor do in Ohio. Yeah, just as last week, we've had a couple of situations, different places, where it's

happening all the time. You have parents who are upset about the books that they put in the schools that are pornographic and sex manuals, but all kinds of perverted sex, but explicit as well. And they'll go to these meetings, these school board meetings, and they'll read them, and they carry them off. And again, why do we give that a pass? It's the same thing that happened during Pride Month. You had one individual who recorded the call, called up the police and said, there's naked men out here going down the street.

Really? Oh, wait, that's the Pride parade. Don't worry about it. What? You know? I mean, they get a pass for that. I remember about 30 years ago, there was a judge in Raleigh where we lived, and he got drunk at a party and he went

out in the garden and he relieved himself and they charged him with an indecent uh uh exposure he didn't know what he's doing he's drunk uh and uh and they removed him from the bench and he got penalties and all the rest of this stuff but we just looked the other way when these people knowingly are doing this and parading around in front of children they get a pass because they have elevated this religion of lgbt haven't they and and you know what what in your opinion is is the the purpose of this for the elites to make this the center of uh to elevate it as as a kind of religion as a kind of well formed secular humanism yeah i can I can bring you right to it. Kevin Jennings, he was appointed as Obama's czar, school czar. He was the one that was responsible for writing the foreword to an elementary book called Queering Elementary Students. And it's also interesting to note that his icon was a man by the name of Harry Hay, who was the head of an organization called NAMBLA, North American Man-Boy Love Association. And here's the end aim right here. This is the

objective that they have in mind. During gay pride parades, NAMBLA had signs carrying signs to the left and to the right and up and down the streets, sex before eight before it's too late. That is a felony. And if you go back to scripture, you can see clearly the Lord condemns it at every given step. And what we can see across the country today is the people that are giving them the pass, are we the people? And if we're going to allow it to go on, it's going to continue on. And if we're going to be complicit with this, we're only adding more strength to tyranny every given step of the way. Yeah, that's absolutely true.

Yeah, when you look at these people, two of the most high-profile abominations that Biden has put into his cabinet, Sam Brinton, he was involved with the Trevor Project, which was to mentor disturbed teenagers, transgender teenagers. So that gave him an opportunity to deal with kids. You look at this Levine character, I think he calls himself Rachel, but his real name is Richard. I call him Dick. Dick Levine was a child psychologist. I gave him an opportunity to work with the kids.

You look at this guy who played Sulu on Star Trek, and he says this is just genocide. It is genocide to them because they have to recruit and steal the kids. And so they want to be able to recruit these kids in these different ways. That's what people need to understand. I've said for the longest time, if they're going to play this game, that kids can decide that they are the wrong gender, and they can then mutilate themselves with chemicals or surgery and all the rest of the stuff. And that's just, and we're fine with that.

If we're going to accept that, then we've just lost all of the statutory rape charges and basically everything else that we outlaw for kids, whether you're talking about guns or alcohol or driving or going to gambling casinos or all the rest of the stuff, that's all fair game now. And the kids have no protection and they're very actively trying to make sure that the parents cannot protect them. That's one of the key things I think in the schools is how they hide this from the parents, isn't it? Well, this is what they mean to do is to assert parental authority.

And it's always been their end aim. And what a better way of doing it, David. I mean, even if you look at it and going back to law again, so people can understand what they can do and what they can't do, the state doesn't have any children. So where are they assuming this authority, but a fictitious overreaching to assume that they have authority, which in fact, they've never been given because the people haven't delegated it to them. So, again, this is criminal at the very core of everything that is going on throughout the states concerning our children and our public schools. Really what people need to do is make reference to the law, find their state statute, and demand that the law is being enforced. And if they're not going to be enforced, then, again, we peruse the U.S. Constitution and find out what we can do to those that refuse to enforce the law. That's the purpose that they're there.

Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. You know, you're talking about the state saying that they own the kids and this has been a battle for the longest period of time. Uh, it is, uh, over a decade ago, uh, I was doing some videos for, this is about 15 years now. I was doing some videos for a parental rights.org. They were trying to get just a couple of sentences passed as a constitutional amendment to recognize parental authority. But of course, you know, that campaign, that being the end goal, it gave them a chance to

talk about all the attacks on parental authority at that point in time. And 15 years ago, it was nothing at all like it is today. It was judges and child custody cases or CPS or some of these other things like that coming in. And it wasn't the schools actively pushing to take the kids away. But the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is how they come at this. They say children have rights. No, they don't. They're not adults. They don't have responsibility. They don't have rights. They have parents to protect them. But they began with that. And even though that is not something that the U.S. is signed on to, you had all these activist judges who were essentially enacting it de facto measures. And then you have the transition that we had more recently, maybe about seven or eight years ago,

we had Melissa Harris Perry on MSNBC saying, we've got to get over this idea that the kids belong to you. You know, they belong to the village. They belong to the community. Of course, Hillary Clinton's always been pushing that stuff. So that is the strain of all this stuff. And people need to understand what their goal is. Their goal is to take the kids because that is what they want for a number of reasons. And that is, even here, Bradley, in Tennessee,

when you had these people who were protesting the law that would stop these dragons from messing with kids, they had these people there with signs and said, I trust the parents. They don't trust the parents. They try to hide everything they can from the parents. Yep, yep. As a matter of fact, that's going on in California right now.

The attorney general is actually trying to sue to basically shut down the parents in that particular state from having any knowledge of what they mean to do. Again, this is completely out of their scope of authority, out of the delegation that the people have given them. This is criminal at every given level. One of the things that I wanted to add to, David, if you don't mind, is the fact that when doing the schools that I've done, also consider the fact that if the parents in this country would pull their kids from public schools, we wouldn't have these issues in the first place. What we found is the kids are being subjected to everything and protected from nothing.

And who's dropping them off at the school gate to be raised up by their sworn enemy but 86% of the people in this country that call themselves conservatives, Christians, and or patriots. So there's a whole lot of hypocrisy going on here. And the fact of the matter is that the people take responsibility and train up their children in the ways that they should go as under the Lord, we wouldn't be in this predicament in any sense of the word today. That's right. I remember back in the late 1980s, there was a court case. It was in Massachusetts, and they were doing sex education, and it wasn't any of this

perverted stuff they've got today, this deviant sex or anything. It was heterosexual sex, but it was to this guy's eight-year-old daughter. And he said, my daughter's too young for this. I don't want her to participate in this class. I said, no, she's going to participate in it. He went down to take her out of the class. They charged him with trespassing. They arrested him and all the rest of the stuff. And when he went to court, they said, when you have dropped off your child at the schoolhouse,

you have turned them over to the state. And we have a doctrine we're going to act in place of the parents. And loco parentis and said, you have abandoned your child to the state when you drop them off at the front of the school. And that was a big issue for us when we decided to homeschool our kids. That along with the fact that Karen had already seen what had happened as a school teacher. She saw how things had radically changed. You know, she's in her early twenties. She hasn't been out of the school, but you know, for four or five years and all of a sudden she doesn't recognize this place anymore. And that was a long time ago. That's like 40 years ago. And so, yeah, I don't recognize this. And that's the other thing. People don't realize just how fast this

is evolving. But that is the key thing, as you point out, the fact that people continue to put their kids in the schools. And I think it was really a blessing in disguise that a lot of people were able to see what was actually happening in their kids' classroom, because they just couldn't believe that it was happening in their kids' classroom. Yeah, I've heard principals, I've heard supervisors, superintendents, the list goes on, where I've had teachers laugh about what's being taught in public schools. I've had a principal in Wisconsin say to me that every three to seven years, their history and their science books are

being changed. And I looked at it and I said, what's funny about that? And they actually have the audacity to believe that they're just doing their job by indoctrinating these kids. But again, if the parents are going to deliver them over, well, then they become open prey and that's exactly what's happening. And what's also interesting too, David, is the kids in schools today, they're not stupid at all. They discern like nobody's business. They're just trying to figure out how they're loved so much by their said pastors and their parents that they're actually being thrown into the lion's den or the shark infested waters to be illegally indoctrinated. So when those kids grow up, they're going to be very angry at the older generation who has in fact subjected them to the indoctrinations that are taking place illegally,

might I add, by the federal government today. Yeah. Yeah. That's what it was set up for. It was set up to control the curriculum. And if you control the curriculum through tests and other things like that, through accreditation, you're going to control what the kids are taught. And then they bribe people to do that with money from Washington. But going back to when we started homeschooling in North Carolina, they call the Homeschooling Association's report, they called it the Greenhouse Report. And as you're pointing out, these kids, they understand what's going on. They see they've been abandoned. And I remember when we had this discussion, even with other Christian parents at

the time, they said, well, I want to send my kid into that situation to be salt and light. And I said, well, you're sending them into a situation they don't have the maturity to handle. And this is a situation where you've got massive pressure from people their age, their peer pressure, plus pressure from somebody who is authority figure above them. And I said, I don't really think they're going to do too well in that type of situation. I think a better approach is to nurture them when they're young and tender. And then at some point, we all have to deal with this stuff. Then they get out there.

But now we see that, don't we, in social media? Because in social media and in regular mainstream media, they're getting pressure from authority figures. They're getting peer pressure from everybody. And that really has become, as much as the schools, I think, a big can tell you again, firsthand, it's not the same school system that we were raised up under in any sense of the word. It may have been bad in the 80s and in the 90s, but it's out of control today. And there's no question as to who's behind this agenda every step of the way. And they're trying to take absolute control over the children. And as long as you're willing to give them over onto the state, they're going to go ahead and oblige themselves and take control. And it's not an authority that we want to give them in any sense of the word.

That's right. Yeah, if there's a spiritual revival in this country, we'll see it as the hearts of the parents, not just the fathers, but the mothers as well, has been turned away from the kids. Turn back to the kids, and then the kids will turn to them. Let's talk a little bit about what is happening with your program here. I see that the, the Facebook has labeled sons of Liberty as dangerous individuals and organizations.

Are you getting censored on Facebook now? What's going on with that? Oh yeah. I've been, we've been censored on Facebook for years now. And it's interesting. I just did another article on this yesterday. Ben Franklin said that our freedom of speech is a bulwark

against tyranny and we see big tech companies illegally censoring at will to do what it is that they want to do but again go back to the communists and you'll understand that the best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves there's no better way of doing that than driving the narrative and we see that uh the six corporations are driving, what is it, up to 94% today of the narrative that we get. There's like a six percentile left of free speech where guys like you and me actually have a right to get out to the people, while we all well know that on our end, we would be probably three to five million followers on Facebook, on YouTube. Both sites pulled our content. We started out sonsoflibertymedia.com. The first

month, we had 750,000 unique visitors. The second month, we had 850,000. The third month, we had up on tipping about a million followers, David, and then Google decides to pull us, Facebook pulls us, and then so did YouTube simultaneously. We've been through about four or five different attorneys right now, and they say that it keeps going back to the district in California where the judges are just basically pulling the teeth out of the law and allowing them to censor at will. There's nothing, there's no front that's more powerful as to how they're winning this war right now than censoring guys like me and you, David. And we're seeing it on a massive scale today.

They even took it so far as to label me as a dangerous organization. Well, you know what? I'll wear that T-shirt. I'll wear that hat because I'm not going to live my life where the enemy's not worried about how I'm living mine because I don't have time to worry about how they're living theirs. And so we're busy. We're in the fight. We're on the cutting edge of what we're called to do here by the Lord. And we're going to continuously do that. And by the grace of God, we're not going anywhere. Yeah. Yeah. You know, what you mentioned there is very key that when you sue these corporations,

besides the fact they have as much money or more, actually have more money than the federal government can create it out of thin air. But of course they got big debts, but you know, these corporations, all this money is difficult to go, but then you have to go to the California jurisdiction, which is what we were just talking about earlier in the program with RFK Jr. He has to sue them in California. And of course, you know, these judges say, no, they can do whatever they want. They can censor a political candidate.

They don't like it because they don't like his content. But we know who it's really coming from. We know it's really coming from the government. We know that they are the deputized state of the government in terms of this censorship. So they're not fooling anybody. It's kind of like, you know, what Oliver Anthony said. They think, you think we don't see what you're doing, but we do, you know, we know exactly what they are doing.

And it is, uh, I'm, I'm glad to see finally, you know, these Twitter files, as I said earlier in the program, at least now, some of these organizations that were, um, you know, uh, conservative think tanks and other places like that said, well, it's a private corporation. They can do what they wish. Now we know that's not true. We know that they were the deputies of this state that is running censorship directly itself. Again, we live it over here, David. I mean, every day of the week, it's another sense of we're being censored here. We tried to jump over to Vimeo. Vimeo lasted for about three days.

We were doing real well over there. Then they decided to pull that. So wherever you're effective, that's what they're targeting right now. So we just decided to go with Exodus 1.10. The more that they afflict the children of Israel, the more they multiply. So the more they attack us, we just go out and get another billboard. We go get another booth. We get out in the public eye.

We do protests. And that's where we should be anyways. I mean, Protestant has meaning protesting, and that's exactly what we're doing. We're being a light in a dark place right now by reproving the darkness. And they continuously do that, David. That's good. That's good. Well, yeah, I mean,

it's coming to, um, our area this weekend. So anybody who's in Tennessee, uh, I'll, I'll find out more about it and I'll keep you informed next couple of days as to what is happening in terms of time. Uh, but yeah, we've got this, uh, dragons with kids show that is coming here, but we talk about censorship, Bradley. I even had on youtube i'm i'm a marked guy um there is a channel that somebody put up that says the david knight show and i don't know how that is still there except that they uh put in when you go to their channel there's something that that plays immediately says i hate trump because i'm talking about what he did you know it's like okay well they did that i guess that's maybe their defense to keep me on YouTube because they kicked me off.

Even when I just put up a channel and played a Christmas songs that I, I did myself Christmas songs. I perform in and, um, you know, they let that up there for about, uh, six months. And then they took that entire channel down with that explanation on YouTube, I guess, just because it's me. Um, but, um, cause there's no copyright, of course, no information with that as well. But that is what we're facing everywhere. And that is the key thing. And that is why this is so important. Because it wouldn't be going to all this effort if it didn't make a difference when we are

able to speak, isn't it? Yeah. Isn't it interesting, David, that Facebook and Twitter and Facebook, they advocate that which is subversive to American government, advocating that which stands against American law, and it's out there, and they're promoting it all day long. But if you hold to the Word of God, and you hold to the U.S. Constitution in exposing them for who they really are, they want people to believe that we're the bad guys when, in fact, we're the ones calling out the bad guys every step of the way. Yeah, absolutely.

Absolutely true. Tell us a bit more about where people can find you. Again, Sons of Liberty Media.com and also Sons of Liberty Radio.com. Is that correct? That's right. We broadcast in about 159 cities every day, six days a week, actually. You can listen to us on Sundays. But we are on sonsoflibertyradio.com. That's who we are. That's what we've done over the last 23 years in ministry across the country.

And it's not just limited to high schools, colleges. We've done television. We've done national broadcasts. The list goes on. You can also jump over to sonsoflibertymedia.com, and we've got about 13 articles that come out every day combating the lives of the mainstream media. So we are on from 2 to 3 Central Standard every single day, and we'd love to have you. And, David, we're probably going to need you up and coming again in the near future to go ahead and co-host that show if you wouldn't mind

well i appreciate it yeah i'd be happy to do it anytime uh because you know look here's the thing that you and i understand and that is that you know breitbart used to say politics is downstream of culture but culture is downstream of what people value what they believe is downstream of what they believe about god and it's downstream of their morals. And this is one of the reasons why that is what is under attack so heavily. And if people are going to sit on the side and say, we don't want to take a stand on this because, you know, we want to be, we want everybody to like us and we don't want to be accused of judging people or their actions or anything like that. If that happens, uh, we're rapidly going down to down the path that we've seen already in

England where they're arresting people who are praying silently outside of an abortion clinic. And if they admit that they were praying silently, they arrest these people. I mean, this is how insane this whole thing is becoming. And that's what's going to happen if we're passive about this, isn't it? Yeah, absolutely. Again, if you look at that, what really bothers me about that is, and this is new news to me,

is those police officers, those law enforcers, those legislators actually somehow or another have deceived themselves into believing that they're upholding the law when in fact they're tearing down the law. This is self-inflicting at every given level. And instead of going up the flagpole the way that they should in upholding the Constitution, they should be dealing with the tyrants, not the innocent.

Yeah, that's absolutely right. Yeah, it's very important. And again, I keep telling people, as I believe you do too as well, the key thing is that we've got to grow this from the ground up. And we have to grow it from the inside out with us first, uh, with our families, with our communities. And then we work in our local community to, uh, to make this happen because, uh, you know, we know from experience, this isn't a theory we know from experience and what we went through in 2020, uh, things got either much, much worse based on the local officials, or they were able to stand and interpose against this kind of tyranny

from above. Thank you so much for joining us bradley dean sons of liberty radio thank you all of you for joining us have a good day thank you david thank you bradley The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKightshow.com.