The David Knight Show - 2Jan23 BEST OF 2022

Episode Date: January 2, 2023

Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm, 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie controversial plans to stop cars traveling between neighborhoods you think they've started this thing low emission zones or ultra low emission zones you know u, U U L E Z. And London is, thank you, Rhonda. I appreciate the tip. Thank you very much, Rhonda Tate. Um, London, all these different places. They say, well, you're not going to come in here unless you've got a zero emission battery charged electric vehicle. You can't even enter this area. And so that's propping up all over the places, or if they let you in,

they might charge you a super, super high price. But for the most part, they just ban the cars. And they started doing that before they came out and said, well, we're going to have a complete ban. We're just going to ban any cars that have any emissions from these areas. Can't travel there. Now we're at the point where they're going to stop cars from being able to travel between neighborhoods. And so the city of Canterbury, there's a Canterbury tale for you, they are going to divide their city up into neighborhoods, into zones. And then they're going to prohibit you from driving your car from one area to another. Is this starting to look like a prison? Do you understand the design right now?

Controversial plans to stop cars traveling between neighborhoods in Canterbury. A draconian plan to stop people driving between neighborhoods has come under fire for banning quote free movement, unquote, as it is approved for consultation. So the government's going to go ahead with it anyway. They don't care. They know what it's about. This is what it's always been about.

It's like, wait a minute. Do you realize you're banning our free movement? Yes, we do. We know exactly what we're doing. And so Canterbury City Council is proposing to divide the city into five different districts with drivers unable to cross between zones without being fined. Instead, the council is asking residents to drive along a new bypass, which, along with other A roads, would create a ring road style approach. There you go. One ring to rule them all and then immobility to bind them.

Lock you down in the shire. You aren't going anywhere, pal. Better get a pony. I'm sure they'll find some way to ban the horses as well. They would have to leave their current neighborhood and reenter their chosen location via specific newly permitted routes. Wow. And it's not going to stop here.

They're not going to be satisfied until they have you living in a Foxconn type of existence. That's why I spent some time talking about that Chinese factory. Big iPhone city. iPhone city. Where everybody looks and lives as if they're in that 1984 Macintosh commercial. They got the gray pajamas and they're enslaved and they can't get out. And you got a city dedicated to building iPhones and slave conditions

and locking people down. And that's what they want to do to everybody. That model of what they have done in China is what they want to make globally. So anybody breaking the new driving rule would be hit with a fine when their movement is captured. And it'll be captured using license plate recognition cameras. Yep. Just like the prisoner's village,

except they won't have to put, they don't have to try to hide the fact that they got cameras. They won't have to put it in the heads of statues and the eyes or start moving around. You walk past it. No, it'd just be everywhere, everywhere.

Uh, so now we told you that, um that they're going to get rid of transportation and what you're talking about here in this kind of an environment what do you need well just like the prisoner's village you don't need anything except your feet and at the very most because you're going to be confined to this little neighborhood, let's just call it a village neighborhood, because you'll be confined to the village neighborhood, you'll only need to have an electric golf cart.

You won't need the kind of car. It's so wasteful to have these cars. Nobody needs that except the government officials because they have to be able to travel. But you don't. So you get a golf cart if you're lucky. If you're lucky. It's all about population control.

It's all about containment. It always was. The conspiracy is now becoming a mandate and dictates by dictators. So they said when they were asked about it the city councilor there in canterbury said i have no real idea what this is going to cost it could total about a hundred million pounds and so they said the government certainly is not going to stump up the money, and we can't either, said one person who was pushing against this. We don't have any idea what it's going to cost. Well, where are we going to get the money?

This could be 100 million pounds, because you're going to have to create a new road, the ring, to rule them all. And you're going to have to put up all these surveillance cameras to read our license plates and all the infrastructure behind that and hire people. How are we going to put up all these surveillance cameras to read our license plates and all the infrastructure behind that and hire people. How are we going to do that? Well, no price is too high for you to pay for your own slavery. That's the bottom line.

We don't care about the cost. You're the one paying for your chains. You're paying for your interrogation. You're paying for your chains. You're paying for your slavery. I mean, to save the planet, that's what you're really paying for your interrogation you're paying for your chains you're paying for your slavery i mean to save the planet that's what you're really paying for you're not paying for enslavement you're not paying for chains you're not paying you're paying to save the planet and no price is too high for that residents would instead be encouraged to use public transportation,

or to walk, or to use a bicycle. That's why Google called their model smart city, they called it Sidewalk Labs in Toronto. And before all this pandemic nonsense began, I was this close to a trip up to Toronto to report about Google's smart city sidewalk labs. And, you know, that was what I said. I said, you're going to be walking on the sidewalk. You're going to be living on the sidewalk.

You're going to be spending as much time on the sidewalk as you can, because even if you've got an apartment, it's going to be only 200 square feet. You want to get out and get on the sidewalk and walk around and they'll be watching you. Everything that you do, everything was about surveillance. As a matter of fact, you had a lot of people in Toronto who were, you know, members of the green religion. They were true believers and everything green and they signed up to be a part of that project.

And as they looked at it, they said, whoa, wait a minute. This is all just about surveillance. Everything we do, our garbage is being monitored and surveilled. This is just about total surveillance. This is creepy. I don't want to have anything to do with this. Many of the people who even believed in the green fables wanted to get out because they could see the Orwellian reality of what it was. And it was no coincidence that they called it Sidewalk Labs.

Labor leader said at the meeting, we need incentives to help people change how they travel, not a draconian ban on free movement, which could be more contrary to the British way of life. So you have three different parties represented here. You have the liberal Democrats, which are more, like I said, liberal parties in the UK, liberal parties in Australia. They use that. We talk about libertarianism. Many people say classical liberal. Liberal used to mean you were about liberty, right? And people who want to focus on liberty will still call themselves liberal in the UK and in Australia,

except that they're not all that much. But first you have the liberal Democrat counselor who says, well, wait a minute, this is going to cost a tremendous amount of money. I don't know if we're going to get that, right? Sounds like a libertarian. You realize how much money this is going to cost a tremendous amount of money. I don't know where we're going to get that. Right. It sounds like a libertarian. You know, you realize how much money this is going to cost and where are we going to get it? And a little bit about the freedom, not much. Then you got the labor leader. The labor leader says, well, we don't want to restrict people's movement. Um, we need to, um, talk about how we're going to subsidize this.

Yeah. Let's spend some money and we'll make them dependent on us for free movement. How about that? That's labor's approach. Then you have the conservative plan and, um, the conservative party, the conservative council leader, uh, said doing nothing is not an option. We just got to do it. I don't really care if it restricts people's freedom.

I don't care if it costs money. The conservative Tory says, let's just do it. We can't just not do this. We got to do it. Why? Why can't you leave well enough alone? Why can't you leave us alone? Why can't you let us drive between neighborhood and neighborhood?

You're saying doing not restricting people's travel between neighborhoods, that is not an option to not do that, that you must? Who are you taking your marching orders from, conservatives and the UK? So there's your three different, that's the three big parties, conservative, labor, and liberal Democrat. We're worried about the money. Let's just spend the money and subsidize it, and people will love us because we give them a hand. We are going to take away their freedom, but then hand it back to them like an allowance.

That's the Democrats. And then the conservatives, we've got to do this. I mean, we can't fall behind. We've got to keep up with the times. You know, Rishi Sunak is their leader. And I guess maybe he's taking his plans for that. Now this is based,

this has already been done. This is not the first city to do it in Canterbury. Belgian city of Ghent did this back in 2017, five years ago, a city in Belgium did it. And so we have to copy that, says the conservative council member. They divide the city into six areas then, so they could cut the cars out of the city center.

Again, this is always about car prohibition. It's always about restricting your movement. It's been that way since 1970, the first Earth Day. It's part of a draft of a local plan, which also suggests building 13,000 homes in this area by 2025. Again, what is that about? Concentrating population. The cities will continue to get denser and denser as the ability to move around is restricted more and more. And we've been seeing this in the United States for a long time, haven't we? And the cities where I've lived, when I want to get away from the cities, when I did get away from the cities, Austin was a good example of it.

I've seen it other places as well. Austin is growing by leaps and bounds, and they're packing more and more people in. And when we went back for the wedding, we saw all these new apartment buildings that were being built everywhere, even in the outskirts. You know, we were about 45 minutes to an hour outside of Austin and going normal speeds, which I didn't go during, during the lockdown and the wee hours of morning when I was driving in at three or four o'clock in the morning into work during lockdown, I could drive whatever I wanted to drive. The police weren't getting anybody tickets. Uh, but anyway, um, that, that was, uh, kind of got me spoiled. Anyway, the, what was I saying? Oh, they're not building any new roads.

In Austin, the only new roads they build are toll roads. And they will restrict and wreck traffic for years and years in order to build a new toll road. And then when they do, you know, people don't want to drive it. So what they do is, as they're building the toll road, they will add traffic light after traffic light after traffic light on the roads that were already there to try to force you onto the toll road. It's just despicable what they're doing. Toll roads in most places are being owned by a company out of spain but um there it's being

run by the department of transportation for the most part in texas and but the bottom line is they just keep packing more and more people in but they don't add any more road capacity unless it's a toll road and they do that at a very slow rate so that's what they're doing here they're going to add 13 000 homes to Canterbury while they start restricting all the mobility and telling people they can't even drive from one neighborhood to the other. So when you look at this, do you start to get the sense that we're under attack? Do you start to get the sense that we're their enemy?

Because what would you do to your enemy if you were at war with them? Well, one of the things that you do is you restrict their mobility, right? Yeah, we got them. They can't move. The other thing you do is you remove their ability to communicate. Oh, yeah, we get banned off of social media and things like that. And also, at the same time, whatever communication they do have, you make sure that you are able to monitor all of it.

You know, just like they did in World War II. You know, they hacked the Enigma code that the Germans had. Yeah, go ahead, use your radio. We know everything that you're planning to do and and how did that work out well you know they had to be careful because they said well you know we're we know they're going to do x so should we intervene and stop them and destroy them when they do that or should we kind of because that will tip our hand and then they'll know that we can read their mail. Essentially listen to all of their,

you know, we've decoded enigma and, uh, so that'll change everything. We may lose that. Uh, or do we wait and hit them bigger by leaving? And that's what they're doing to us as well.

You know, they have the ability to listen to everything that we're doing, watch everything that we're doing, shut down our ability to communicate with each other, shut down our ability to move. This is war folks. This is war sanctions are an act of war. Sanctions kill people. Sanctions are being enacted against our country.

It hasn't hurt Putin and the Russians. It hasn't hurt China. They're doing great. I said months ago. Already at that point in time. Just a couple of months after the sanctions started. Putin enjoyed $320 billion bonus. He was producing less oil and getting paid a lot more for it.

Even with a 30% discount if people paid him in rubles or gold. So he's doing less, making more money. Whereas we are seeing the price of everything skyrocket, and now people are looking at energy shortages coming up during the winter. The plans to stop people from moving from one neighborhood to the other were opposed during the meeting, it says. But they've gone to residents for consultation until the new year. So nobody liked this plan, except for maybe the conservative counselor.

And that means that they're not going to stop it, though. They approved it to go to the next plan. And then they're going to take it to the neighborhoods and they're going to run the same scam that they've been doing for years in neighborhoods in the U S when they were pushing agenda 21, even before they started calling it the 2030 agenda, the UN 2030 agenda, even before they started calling it the great reset that began in 2015, prior to 2015, it was called agenda 21. They said sometime in the 21st century, we're going to create mega smart cities that are going to be like Foxconn. And we're going to imprison everybody in those cities. And it's going to be great because, you know, we'll have fewer people and all the green agenda.

The way they sold it was they went around to different communities. And they used these local committees and they would, they said they're going to have consultations with residents. It's going to be a massive PR and propaganda push. And they will probably roll it out the, and they would bring people in that were active in the community, took an active role and paid attention to what was going on. Most of the people in any community are just too busy bring them into these committee meetings, and they would set them down, they would divide up into groups, and they would have a facilitator as part of this Delphi technique, and they would walk them through and ask them for input. But they would very carefully guide them so that they believed that they were coming up with a solution,

which is really what the Delphi people had already decided they wanted to do. It's a very sophisticated technique to get people on board to think that it was coming from the people when it was actually being imposed upon them from the top down. The Common Man The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com. We'll see you next time. the excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Let's all go to the lobby. Let's all go to the lobby. Let's all go to the lobby to get ourselves a treat. Delicious things to eat.

The popcorn can't be beat. The sparkling drinks are just dandy. The chocolate bars and the candy. So let's all go to the lobby to get ourselves a treat. Let's all go to the lobby to get ourselves a treat The Atlantic has come out and written an op-ed piece calling for pandemic amnesty to forgive one another and of course if we go back and look at what they were doing just a year ago the atlantic had calls like, unvaccinated people belong on the no-fly list. And now, let's declare pandemic amnesty.

That's an article there by Information Liberation that you'll see there. Interestingly enough, I haven't seen anybody else point this out, the Atlantic is now owned by Steve Jobs' leftist widow, a younger female version of George Soros in terms of wealth and funding leftist causes. But isn't that interesting? Back to Apple again. Back to the 1984 Foxconn iPhone City Smart City.

It's got to be a smart city, right? It's to make your smartphone. They got to have a smart city. They should call's to make your smartphone. They got to have a smart city. They should call it the smart iPhone city or the iPhone smart city. Anyway, from the Atlantic, let's declare a pandemic amnesty. We need to forgive one another for what we did and what we said when we were in the dark about COVID, she says. You know, all that stuff about putting you on an OFI list, all that stuff

about punishing you, taking your job, kicking you out of the hospitals, denying you any transplants, you know, all that stuff. Putting you in a FEMA camp, all that stuff. No, we just didn't know what we were doing, she says. In April 2020, with nothing else to do, this woman, this writer is Emily Oster. So she said, in April 2020, with nothing else to do, my family took an enormous number of hikes. We all wore cloth masks that I had made myself. Oh, she's so industrious. We had a family hand signal, which the person in front would use if someone was approaching on the trail. And we needed to put on our masks.

Oh, well, you know, somebody's got point. Look out, there's intruders coming. Disease is on the way. Death is right around the corner. Put on your mask to save yourself. Anyway, she said, once when another child got too close to my then four-year-old son on a bridge, he yelled at her, social distancing. This is what these people are going to be like. This four-year-old has this imprinted on him.

And he's going to be like this the rest of his life. He would have been that way anyway with a mother like Emily Oster. These precautions were totally misguided, she says. In April 2020, no one got the coronavirus from passing somebody else hiking. Who knew? Who knew that you couldn't spread it like that out in the open area? And yet we saw people being pounced upon by cops in Australia. A guy is out there by himself on the beach, getting fresh air and sunshine, vitamin D, in other words. And he gets pounced upon by cops who beat him and arrest him

for that. Who knew? Just forget about that. Just forget about it. It's all over with. We don't need to talk about that anymore. Outdoor transmission was vanishingly rare she said our cloth masks made out of old bandanas wouldn't have done anything anyway but the thing is we didn't know you didn't know really really she says i've been reflecting on this lack of knowledge thanks to a class that I am co-teaching at Brown University on COVID. Wow. Wow. How is it that an information liberation says this? How is it that now the people who are right about this

are getting any teaching positions at Brown University? Maybe Brown University ought to ask me how I knew about this months before the lockdown I'd already been talking about it for over three months You see what they're doing in China? I don't want to do that Even if this was deliberate, weaponized, and real You don't want to do that

That's going to make everything worse That's what I was saying for three months before that idiot Trump Followed that devil Fauci going to make everything worse that's what i was saying for three months before that idiot trump followed that that uh devil fauci devils both of them frankly uh so informational liberation says how come none of the people who are right about this from the very beginning like dr ron paul for example are being invited to teach at top universities how come they're being censored, silenced, and blacklisted for being right? While those who are wrong about everything are getting promoted.

Yeah. How does that work? Yeah. You talk about getting promoted. You know, meet people like Ben Shapiro getting promoted. Look at how he's one with all this stuff. Remember what he said about all this? Here's Ben Shapiro on how he just didn't know.

We were lied to by the scientists. We were lied to by Pfizer. We were lied to by the government. We were lied to by the Biden administration. We were lied to. I don't like being lied to. I don't know about you. And he didn't know any better.

I do not believe these people. Now, as I've spoken out before, I got vaxxed twice. I'm double vaxxed. My wife being a doctor and seeing vulnerable patients is triple vaxxed. But knowing now what I know then, knowing then what I know now, rather, what I have actually gotten back. He knows it now. What do you know then? That my actual chance of death from COVID were exorbitantly low and I wouldn't be preventing my parents from getting. That was really what I was concerned about.

Oh yeah. I don't know. I really don't know. I think maybe not because again, my personal risk when it comes to the vaccine was extremely low when it came to COVID. I'm a young, healthy male with no preexisting conditions.

How'd you know that? Did they tell you? Did they tell you that? Why is anybody, why is this guy promoted i mean to me to see this guy that that's even that's even more egregious than this woman who teaches at brown university now about uh covid she now teaches about it she admits that she was wrong about everything he admits he was wrong about everything both of them promoted

endlessly you know he was right there everything. Both of them promoted endlessly. You know, he was right. There was a little bit of a Freudian slip there. You know, I know now what I knew then. You knew Ben, you knew, come on. You knew you're not that stupid. You may be a lot of things, but you're not stupid. That's one thing. Ben Shapiro is not stupid.

And his wife, he says, is a doctor who's been triple jabbed note to self if i'm ever in nashville and i get sick make sure my doctor is not female named shapiro i don't want that woman coming anywhere close to me what a brain dead doctor i guess you know the person at the bottom of the medical class still becomes doctor, as I always say. And I guess maybe that's Ben's wife. Was it that, or what did she do it for the money?

What'd she do it for? Anyway, uh, some of these choices turned out better than others to take an example, close to my own work. There was emerging, if not universal consensus, that the schools in the U.S. were closed too long, she says. Another example, when the vaccines came out, we lacked definitive data on the relative efficacies

of the Johnson & Johnson shot versus the mRNA options from Pfizer and Moderna. What a bunch of nonsense. I've repeated this how many times? I knew and told everybody on November the 10th, what a piece of nonsense this was. You had Pfizer coming out on that Monday after the election on Tuesday. You had Biden anointed by the media on Saturday. On Sunday, just like clockwork, 60 Minutes runs the piece that they've already set up about how the military is going to distribute the vaccines with operational warp speed.

The next day on Monday, you had Pfizer come out and announce, oh, by the way, we did our test a long time ago. We were holding it for the election. But now that the election is over and Biden is anointed, we can tell you that we are 90% effective. And that was ludicrous. You don't get any. First of all, they skipped all the testing.

How could you say that it was 90% effective when you did no testing? I mean, does Ben Shapiro and his wife, did they ever look to see what the protocol is for doing testings? Did they ever look to see why it takes 10 years to go through all these different tests? Did they ever notice that Fauci and his co-conspirators were talking about how they could get rid of that requirement for money? Anyway, so that Monday, which was November the 10th, if I remember correctly. No, it was November the 9th. November the 9th.

Pfizer comes out, says 90%. The next day, Russia comes out, says, we got a vaccine, that's 92%. Then the following Monday, November the 16th, Moderna comes out, says we're 94%. The next day, Tuesday, November the 17th, Pfizer comes out and says we're 94 and a half percent. And I've been laughing about that the entire time. I mean, they're just making these numbers up. It's a bidding war. It's a competition. It's BS, total BS. Anyway, she goes on to say, you know, we didn't know what the efficacies were. Well, you told everybody that it's 90 to 95% effective. She said this misstep wasn't nefarious.

It was a result of uncertainty. So, huh. Information liberation, Chris Minahan there says there says well there's nothing nefarious about forcing people to get injected with experimental foreign substances with zero long-term testing yeah that is nefarious so why is the MAGA crowd still cheering Trump for that? Anyway, the Atlantic article continues to say, obviously some people intended to mislead and made wildly irresponsible claims. But remember when the public health community had to spend a lot of time and resources urging Americans not to inject themselves with bleach.

Yeah. Don't inject yourself with bleach i don't think anybody ever took that seriously don't inject yourself with bleach inject yourself with something to reprogram your dna yeah that's what you want it probably would be better off injecting yourself with bleach i'm not joking anyway um so put out that i said that yeah go get yourself injected with bleach uh seriously you know when we look at this i loved this response uh to all of this stuff on tiktok listen to this guy look look look look look point to the article everybody to forget and forgive everything that happened during the pandemic. We were all in the dark. We were all afraid.

Like that was like, we all got kidnapped and put together on an island. And then all y'all bastards were like, we should eat them. And then now they took us off the island and we're just looking at you on the ride home. Like, and you're like, Oh, wasn't that crazy? And we're like oh wasn't that crazy and we're like you tried to eat us i didn't kick you out of those stores i didn't ruin your job i didn't tell you you couldn't come to the family reunion i didn't tell you you had to drop dead of a heart attack because you didn't get the jab so you're not welcome at this hospital there ain't nothing to forgive on my side baby boo this is you problem and we're still talking about it yeah can we just forget about all this stuff he nailed it

yeah it's like given the amount of uncertainty on every topic some people were eventually proven right and someone else was approved wrong in In some instances, listen to this, the right people were right for the wrong reasons. Oh, yeah, because, you know, even if you're right, if you opposed authority, if you questioned authority, you're still wrong, and you still need to be kept off of YouTube, and you need to be kept off of Facebook and all the rest of the places, like me, right? You know, I had the right answers, but I had them for the wrong reasons, and you need to be kept off of Facebook and all the rest of the places like me, right?

You know, I had the right answers, but I had them for the wrong reasons because I pointed out these people are conspiring criminal conspirators who've been working on their conspiracy and practicing it on an annual basis for two decades. And when I pointed that out, I was right for the wrong reasons because I pointed out exactly what these people are about. So I was right for the wrong reasons because I pointed out exactly what these people are about. So I was right for the wrong reasons. That explains it. The people who got it right for whatever reason, she says, may want to gloat. Those who got it wrong for whatever reason may feel defensive and retrench into a position

that doesn't accord with the facts. All of this gloating and defensiveness continues to gobble up a lot of social energy. It continues to drive culture wars. They're the ones who locked people out. They're the ones who are still censoring people. Just like he said, wait a minute, I'm pushing people out? No, you're pushing people off of platforms. These discussions are heated. They're unpleasant. They're ultimately unproductive. In the face of so much uncertainty.

Getting something right. Had a hefty element of luck. You see I was just lucky. She was unlucky when she taught her kid. To be a. Authoritarian draconian little scold. Social distancing. Wear your mask.

All that kind of stuff. And when they turn society into this. Look. authoritarian draconian little scold social distancing wear your mask you know all that kind of stuff uh and when they turn society into this look uh this had a purpose it still has a purpose it's still going on so before we talk about any amnesty before we talk about any kind of truth and reconciliation we need to have a little bit more truth here Before there can be some reconciliation There needs to be some restitution There needs to be some justice Before we can have any reconciliation here

From a political standpoint Look, the purpose of government is not to be merciful That's God God is merciful And we can forgive other people But we don't, you know, when you have somebody like Jeffrey Dahmer or you got, you know, Ted Bundy or son of Sam, you know, some of these guys said, well, you know, I've, I've, um, I found Christ and he's forgiven me. And it's like,

yeah, you know, but you're still going to die because we can't trust that you're going to be safe outside. And the government is about justice. It's not about mercy and forgiveness. God does that, and God can forgive that, and God can forgive the most heinous crimes. You know, we look at the most heinous crimes as those that are committed against other human beings. But God can forgive that and does forgive that. But government's purpose is justice, and it does not bear the sword in vain. So what do we need from these people like this woman? And let me just read you some of the things that she wrote on her.

It's in this Information Liberation article. Chris Minahan's got a couple of clips. Professor Emily Oster, that's what she calls her. That's her name on Twitter. She's very proud of the fact she's a professor at Brown. She's the author of this article at The Atlantic. December the 22nd, this last December the 22nd, she said this. Shaming people who haven't gotten vaccinated is not likely to work at this point or ever.

So what will work? Well, we need to have individual family pressure, she says, three days before Christmas. Punish, you know, split your families up. Here she is. She just said, you know, it's really not productive to keep all this stuff. We don't want to have culture wars. We're gobbling up a lot of social energy and everything. Three days before Christmas, she was telling people,

we need to break our families up over whether or not they've been vaccinated. She said, we need what will work individual family pressure, maybe vaccine requirements for things you want to do, such as domestic, air, train, travel, work, sports, events, yes, and even family gatherings is what she's implying here. She says we can have these without shame. She also said, strongly endorse here that if you're pregnant and unvaccinated, get vaccinated. It will protect you. It will also pass antibodies to your fetuses. It will also pass the spike, which causes them to have blood clots and die as well.

They've been able to find that as well. So what do we do with this, as I started to say before? Well, first of all, to rectify this, there is not going to be any forgiveness. We're not going to move on from this until you move on from the emergency. You end the Trump emergency and the subsequent ones that have been stacked on top of it by Biden. So you end the emergency. Let's see some indictments for the people who violated their oath to the Constitution and instituted all kinds of draconian commands for us.

Let's return some of the stolen money. Let's return some of the jobs that were taken away. And let's have some of the stolen money. Let's return some of the, uh, the jobs that were taken away. And let's have some restitution there about that. Let's make sure that we got some reforms to ensure that this never happens again. These people who usurped power, all these public health officials everywhere. First of all, let's get rid of all of these state laws that were put in place back in 2001, modeled after the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act. Get rid of all of those. Okay, then we'll talk.

Get rid of the emergency orders, get rid of all that stuff, and then we can talk about all this. But the justice and the restitution needs to come from government. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com We'll see you next time. horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie you know we had a lot of referenda on abortion and everywhere they put abortion on to make it a constitutional state right you know and put it in the state constitution, a right to kill babies, it succeeded. But I think the most amazing piece of abortion legislation that was put on the ballot was out of Montana. Montana voters, apparently, I mean, they're still counting votes, of course,

but there's a big difference with about 80% of the votes. It was 53-47. To say that if a baby survives an abortion attempt, and so the baby is outside of the mother's body and it's fighting for its life. They put in a measure that said an infant born alive is a legal person for all purposes under the laws of the state and is entitled to the protections of the laws, including the right to appropriate reasonable medical care and treatment. And the protections of the laws, including the right to appropriate reasonable medical care and treatment. And the people of Montana said no. No.

Now, this is not what is typically talked about with abortion. Oh, well, this is my body, my choice. This is a baby that is outside of the mother's body struggling to live. It's probably been scalded with some kind of a chemical or has had limbs that have been ripped off of it and it's dying. And the voters of Montana say, kill it. Don't give it any help. They're pushing and accepting infanticide. You know, these people have always tried to make the case that it's the mother's body. I always said, no, it's not the mother's body. Pushing and accepting and fantasizing.

You know, these people have always tried to make the case that it's the mother's body. I always said, no, it's not the mother's body. It's a different body. Half the time, it's a different sex. Always, it has unique DNA, unique fingerprints, and all the rest of this stuff. It is a person. And, oh, no, it's the mother's body. Well, it's not.

This shows more than anything, just like all this stuff. Well, I don't want the government in there with my doctor-patient relationship. It just ought to be, all my health decisions ought to be between me and my doctor. We saw what a lie that was for the last two years. And now we can see all this stuff about my body, it's my body. No, it's not your body. And they know that and they know that even if the baby is outside they will kill it i don't know what's going on in montana i was for some reason thought montana was a conservative area but i saw in the not just this i saw in missoula montana

that um they're proud of the fact they've got some state representatives now. They've got a transgender representative and a non-binary representative going to represent them in Missoula, Montana. And they're voting to kill babies that are born alive, voting for infanticide. It all goes together, doesn't it? It all goes together, doesn't it? It all goes together. Ensuring newborns who survive failed abortions are not left to die is generally regarded as a moderate proposal, writes LifeSite News. Pro-lifers are facing defeat on all statewide abortion-related ballot measures this election, which in addition to Montana, were voted on in Vermont, California, Kentucky, and Michigan.

Yeah, all of these. The unanimous position here, even in places you would think, like Kentucky or Montana, they're not supporting it. And even in Montana, to support infanticide. Let me tell you, God will judge this nation, and I think the judgment's already begun. Just take a look at what is happening in this country already. We're already in the midst of judgment. The degeneracy, the depravity, the murder of innocent, the taking of innocent life,

the shedding of innocent blood. I mean, we are storing up wrath for ourselves and for our future generations here in this country. So Vermont has enshrined a constitutional right to kill babies, 133,000 to 42,000. It wasn't even close in Vermont. Similar things in California and Michigan. Fundamental right put in the state constitution. It passed there 56 to 44%. This is a snapshot of america uh don't complain when um god takes everything away from us

the common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com We'll see you next time. The roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie A former Planned Parenthood manager, Sue Thayer,

describing in a new video how abortion facility workers can see with their own eyes that the children being aborted are real human beings and not just, in her words, clump of cells. I said, why are there three arms? And we're looking, and the gal training me said, twins. It was twins. Sue, you described when you were first being trained at Planned Parenthood, they sent you to an actual abortion room to witness the procedure.

Can you tell us about that experience? Well, when you first start out, they have the trainees stand by the door. And I did that for the first two or three procedures and I finally said, why? Why does that happen? And she said, well, usually when somebody comes in for the first time, they pass out. And I didn't. I didn't pass out. So after, I don't know, a few were done, they let me start moving closer so I could get to the foot of the bed and be able to see, you know, what was happening.

But the whole procedure only takes just three or four minutes. And what they call the contents of uterus or products of conception are emptied into this gallon jar. And they turn it off and take this suction thing off the gallon jar and set it in the pass through and it goes into the dirty lab. So then you go around the corner and into the dirty lab, take the jar out, put it in this big like a Rubbermaid colander and rinse it with this big hose. Then you dump it in this little glass jar and put it on this little shelf that has this bright light. And you bring the light over it and you kind of piece it back together and try to see if you got

all the parts. And I remember standing there looking at that and I said, why are there three arms? You know, and we're looking and the gal training me said, twins, it was twins. And I said, you know, do you tell the mom that she had twins? And she says, no, it usually just upsets them. Then of course this jar, this little glass bowl with this baby, depending on how far along the baby was, there's this big white porcelain sink. They would dump it in there, rinse it, put the bowl back to use next time, and hit the plunger and it would flush, kind of like a toilet. And I just remember standing there thinking, all those babies are in the Des Moines sewer system.

In later time that I would be there, they were putting those babies in little red bags with a twist tie, and then they'd fling them in the freezer. And I remember kind of thinking, I wonder what they do with those, because I thought if there's a buck to be made, they will sell those. Isn't that amazing? Now, why is it that Republicans are afraid to expose this truth? And they say Planned Parenthood does less than 2% of breast exams,

less than 1% of U.S. pap tests, less than 2% of breast exams, less than 1% of U.S. PAP tests, less than 2% of cancer screenings. So is this about women's health care? No, it's not. But again, why are Republican candidates afraid to expose that? Why are they afraid to expose what's been done with the pharmaceutical industry to harm people? They're running like cowards. From life and death, truth. And you have people like Lindsey Graham who wants to federalize this again.

And, of course, the Democrats as a group want to federalize it in the other direction. And, of course, if Lindsey Graham is successful in getting Republican colleagues to federalize a prohibition of abortion at the federal level, that will be reversed in no time at all by Democrats. No, taking a life is not something that should be up for a vote. And it is something that we're going to be able to fight more effectively at the local level, simply because these people are such cowards about this type of thing.

So, as the article LifeSite News says, there's no excuse for the ignorance. We can glance at an ultrasound screen. We can even get the information on YouTube for the time being. And be astonished at the miracle of life and all of its stages as it's developing. And they have in this article a lot of links to places where they have, they're starting to put together projects like this one, the Endowment for Human Development, a scientific nonprofit, a profit that partnered with National Geographic

to create a DVD called The Biology of Prenatal Development. So it's got a lot of scientific facts. It's got detailed, clear ultrasounds. It's got in utero pictures that show step-by-step development of humans in the mother's womb. While science has known for decades, they say that a child's heart starts beating by 21 days. A recent scientific discovery suggests

the first beats may actually occur at 16 days. The way we combat this is with truth. And of course, you know, because we have people who commit murder and all kinds of crimes against their fellow man, you will still have people, even if they know that it is murder, they will still do it,

and they'll do it for money. But that's why we have the government to stop people like that. Murderers. Killers for hire. And that's what the government should be doing. Now, this next video I'm going to play for you is incredibly powerful. So powerful that I would warn you that if you're listening to this or watching this and you don't want to see this, skip ahead four minutes when I start playing this thing. This is animated and it is narrated by Kevin Sorbo, who is a Christian actor.

He played Hercules on TV. And it is based on a true story. The video is called The Procedure. It's four minutes long. It's an animated clip. And it is based, the narration is based on the account of a sonographer who witnessed the procedure. And it is really heartbreaking, very upsetting.

So Karen, do not watch this and anybody else. But I wanted you to see this because it is so powerful. The truth is powerful. The truth doesn't need to be defended. It needs to be unleashed. And if you've got somebody, I tweeted this out yesterday, and I said, for those of you who say that this is about a woman's right to choose, typically you are the people who are putting masks on us, who are demanding that we stay under house arrest or get an untested vaccine. You're not about choice. And you're denying the humanity of the baby that is being destroyed.

Those are the people who need to see this. If you're pro-life, you don't need to see this. It's a very upsetting scene. But you may want to see this so that you can unleash this truth, this very disturbing, powerful truth on those who are still pushing lies for whatever purpose. I had just arrived at work as the hospital's lead sonographer and was looking at the patient's schedule for the day when my boss told me to go immediately to the OR. The surgeon was requesting ultrasound guidance.

That was all the information I was given. I had no idea what I was walking into. I wheeled the ultrasound machine into the OR. The patient was already sedated on the operating table. Plugging in the machine, I waited for instructions from the doctor. He barked at me to place the ultrasound probe on the patient's pelvis so he wouldn't perforate her uterus. Still confused about the procedure, I did as he asked and realized the woman was pregnant. She was in her second trimester, so I easily determined the gender of her baby,

a little girl. Stunned, I watched the doctor thrust a catheter into the amniotic sac. The fetus dodged the catheter and tried to hide in the top of her mother's uterus to get away. In horror, I watched as he inserted a forceps clamp and grabbed her tiny leg. She writhed around in pain trying to break free, but there was nowhere for her to go. Then the doctor pulled hard until her leg ripped away from her body. She recoiled and violently twisted around in pain and curled herself into a tight ball. But it was no use. The clamp grabbed her arm and she struggled to pull away. Her movements weakened now because she was dying. He pulled her arm off of her body. My vision blurred.

My eyes filled with tears. The child again curled herself into a tight ball, but again, the device grabbed her other leg and it was ripped from her body. By now, her heartbeat had slowed significantly. But she was still alive. The clamp grabbed her last limb and ripped it off. She wiggled and squirmed around and then her heart finally stopped beating. I announced that there was no more cardiac activity. The nurse and scrub tech in the room gasped, realizing for the first time that this was

happening to a fetus that was still alive. The remaining body parts, the head and torso, were removed. Placenta was removed and a final look with ultrasound revealed all products of conception were removed. I was told I could leave the room. Up until that moment I had been frozen. I silently removed the ultrasound machine from the operating room, went directly to the locker room, and threw up.

I quit my job at that hospital shortly after. I told my boss I would never again participate in that type of procedure. I was having nightmares and could not escape the memory of what I had witnessed. I would never again assist in the murder of a child. It was over 20 years ago, but it's just as vivid in my mind today as the day it happened. The saddest part is that this procedure is still happening today. People have no idea we are murdering babies in this way. They think it isn't a person, that it's just a mass of tissue. I'm so sorry for what happened to this little girl. For what I did to her. I'm sorry, sweetheart.

I'm so sorry. Wow. Truly is amazing. It's amazing, isn't it, that this is still going on? How was it that it went on for so long? We had the tools to stop it. We had gutless politicians and an ignorant population refusing to use the 10th Amendment, which ultimately, as I said for years, stopped the killing.

Stand up for the 10th Amendment. That's the Constitution. If you stand for the law and if you stand for life, you could have ended this without 63 million of those. But they didn't. Eventually, the Supreme Court said, yeah, the 10th Amendment says this decision belongs at the states. And so do not allow Lindsey Graham and the Democrats to bring this back and federalize it again. We have to stop this abomination. The Republicans, gutless Republicans, afraid to defend this, afraid to unleash the truth on people.

You know, from the time I've been looking at this in the late 1980s, they do everything they can to try to hide what's really going on. They don't want people to, you look at the wrath of Elizabeth Warren, how angry she gets when people go to clinics because now they can see with ultrasound what this guy saw. I don't want them to see what's going on. Years before that, they would do everything they could to stop people from putting pictures up of aborted babies

like you just saw. Could not stand that truth. They would do anything to stop that. Fox News fired Matt Drudge, and he did it deliberately, he told me. He said, yeah, I did that because I wanted to get out of my contract. He put up the picture of baby Samuel. And that was a live baby that was being operated on.

It was not being killed. His spine was being fixed in utero. But he reached up with that tiny hand, grabbed that finger of that doctor. And they don't just, it isn't just that Fox News and the establishment media and the Republicans and the Democrats don't want you to see the murder. They don't want you to see the humanity. That's what Fox News fired Matt Drudge for, because they didn't want the humanity shown. And so you have Hillary Clinton tweeting out this video where they think that this is a winning issue for them. If only we would defend life and the truth and the Constitution, that would be a win.

We have people who are afraid to do that, ashamed to do that, who have a different agenda, frankly. And so in this particular ad, again, pushed out by Hillary Clinton, a pro-life woman said she was featured in it. She said, I was outraged that she featured me in a pro-choice ad, a pro-abortion ad, really, we want to be honest about it, shared by Hillary Clinton and by Governor Gavin Newsom in support of a proposal to enshrine abortion in California's state constitution. In an open letter she posted on her Twitter account, October 20th, Macy Petty excoriated Clinton, Newsom, and those behind the ad,

claiming that they were doing so, that they were misusing her image to promote what she said was demonic activity. Now, if you just saw that video, do you think that that's an overstatement? They call that demonic? I don't. She said the video disseminated by Clinton, Newsom, and many others briefly depicts Macy Petty collapsing on the ground in tears outside the Supreme Court as the announcement came in June that Roe v. Wade had been overturned. Superimposed over the image was the word sad, sad sad implying that her reaction was one of devastation but she said it was one of joy and so she replied to that she said hey hillary i'm the girl crying in the video and those are happy tears because i just witnessed a miracle here's the commercial when this happened we got mad

sad scared but now we can get to work while some states are already on the attack indiana passing a near total ban this november californians can protect the right to reproductive freedom for generations because we're not going back. Keeping politicians out of our doctor relationship, these same people, look at what they did with the pandemic, with the vaccines, with everything else. What a bunch of demonic, murdering liars they are.

Isn't it just disgusting? She was disgusted with that as well. These people, one thing I agree with them, we are not going back. We're not going to go back to a situation where Planned Parenthood can get obscenely rich murdering people, and we've got to stop the pharmaceutical companies getting obscenely rich murdering people as well. We need to abort these Trump shots. The common man.

They created common core and dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. We'll see you next time. we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.

This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. a call from vox the leftist publication, Vox.com. There is a call now to vaccinate the turkeys.

Wait a minute. I thought they already did that for the last two years. No, they're talking about the literal turkeys, the literal turkeys. And, you know, Biden was looking at a literal turkey. He had this to say as part of the White House ceremony. How many turkeys have you got down here? God love you. Nine and a half million turkeys. I'll tell you what, it's like some of the countries I've been to.

Anyway. Anyway. it's almost like a democrat national committee meeting or something nine and a half million turkeys it's like some of the countries i've been to go ahead and insult the countries that you've been to uh but you know there's a lot of turkeys out there and that's a lot of vaccines if you could start to get all the turkeys and chickens vaccinated, which is what they want. Vaccinate the turkeys and the chickens because bird flu is driving up turkey and egg prices, killing millions of animals. Guess what?

When you read the article, you find that it's not bird flu that's killing them, but when they have some turkeys or chickens who test positive for bird flu, they kill the birds. Massive amounts of birds culled. And done in a way that Cory Booker decided that he would virtue signal to protect the turkeys. You know, it's to pardon the turkeys. He's not happy with the way they're being killed. I'll tell you about that in just a second.

But here's what Vox says. Consumers are spending around 20% more on the centerpiece bird than last Thanksgiving. And of course, that's thanks to Biden, you'd say. Well, they don't say that. But it's farmers grappling with higher fuel costs, higher feed costs and labor costs. So the inflation began as he started throttling and strangling our food supply. And that's percolating through to the cost of feed, the cost to feed ourselves as well, and labor costs because of inflation.

But the price hikes are also connected to the bird flu, a highly infectious avian influenza burning through poultry flocks around the globe. So far this year, 8.1 million turkeys in the U.S. have died due to the bird flu. Or they were culled. Because, again, this is the same type of thing. We saw we had people being called with ventilators, right? Uh, preemptively or whatever. Um, so that, that's one guy, that one guy who gave the turkeys, the deep brought the Turkey for the white house.

Um, he had nine and a half million birds, just one producer. And so that's a lot of turkeys. Biden was impressed with that. You should be impressed with that. Nine and a half million turkeys. Well, throughout the entire U.S., they say that eight million turkeys died now even if that was from the bird flu and it wasn't them being culled but it's not it's the culling let's just pretend though for a moment that it's the bird flu killing them that's less than this guy's got

one producer of turkeys anyway uh about 3.7 percent of those farmed each year, along with over 40 million chickens. That's a lot of chickens. I wonder how many chickens we've got. Well, I didn't look it up, but you can guess. Most don't die from the virus itself. Here's the truth, okay? Rather, they're culled or proactively killed in a brutal effort to prevent the virus from doing even more damage um you know you might get sick so i'm gonna kill you that sounds like our current

ama doesn't it that's exactly it so maybe the cdc will do this to us the next time the next time we've got some kind of china lockdown to push on us or something. Well, they'll kill us proactively. Came pretty close with it. With the, um, the ventilators and things like that. So, um, Cory Booker is getting involved. Now he's looking for something to get back in the news with, and he's this turkey, uh, has, uh, identified with other turkeys. He's going to save the turkeys because they're being mass murdered,

murder most foul. They're being mass murdered by suffocation or they turn the temperature up real high and they die from a high temperature. So the way they put it in this Vox article, they are cooked alive. Well, you know, so let's get the vaccine because that's a much more humane way to kill

them, isn't it? I mean, if it works like Trump's shots, you won't even know what hit you. You might die instantly, or if it accelerates cancer and kills your immune system, you die from something you won't know that it's a vaccine. So just as they have been doing to humans, they could do to the turkeys. It'd be so much more humane to kill them with a vaccine, wouldn't it, than to suffocate them or to cook them alive. A sobering question from the COVID-19 pandemic says Vox, is that even the best vaccine isn't good enough on its own to stop a deadly disease?

Well, guess what? If the vaccine doesn't good enough on its own to stop a deadly disease. Well, guess what? If the vaccine doesn't stop you getting a disease, that's not working. That's the point of a vaccine. It's not a therapeutic. It's why they had a different way of testing vaccines than they did testing therapeutics. They give the people the vaccine, let them wander around for years and compare the people who got the vaccine with the control group that didn't get it, and then look at the different infection rates. It was all about stopping.

And if you had a much, much lower infection rate, they would presume that the vaccine had stopped it. But, of course, these vaccines don't last for more than a couple of months, according to them, if they ever worked at all, if they ever had a purpose of preventing you from getting a disease. The purpose was to create a disturbance in your immune system. The purpose was to genetically create a toxic spike protein, and that's what they're looking for. They don't care whether you got immunity. They don't even pretend that it gives immunity. They're looking to see if it's doing something

to you. So Kansas-based Siva Animal Health, the company, they have a vaccine that's administered in the egg or on the day that the chicks are born. They say that it's 80 to 100% effective for almost five months. They don't even pretend anymore. It is licensed in the U.S., as are vaccines by Zetas and Merck, but none of them have been approved by the USDA. Thank you, USDA. You see, USDA is involved in our food supply, just like the Food and Drug Administration, the FDA. And they've been involved in a turf war about how some of these fake meats and things like that are going to be, lab meat and stuff like that, biopsy burgers. So they've been involved in a turf war.

And so the USDA is there to inspect meat and things like that. If this had been under the auspices of the FDA, you better believe they just would have waved this through and told everybody, you better get it. Fortunately, at least for now, the vaccine manufacturers for animals are going to have to pony up a little bit more money perhaps so they can get these turkey vaccines out there. Because right now the USDA is saying, no, no, we're not going to do this. And here's their reasoning. It isn't because they're worried about adulterating the food

supply. It's because other countries are worried about adulterating the food supply. And so it would interfere with global trade. So there's a lot of countries that will not accept food from the United States because of antibiotics and other things that we put in our factory farming system. And this would just be one more reason for them not to buy American food because they don't want all the toxic garbage that is put into our food with the blessing of the federal government watchdogs who are supposed to be stopping that. So that's the thing that's holding it up, really.

It's not even the USDA as a watchdog. They're looking at this and saying, well, you know, we're not going to be able to sell any of this stuff globally if we put these vaccines in. So Vox points out, they said, well, and here's the problem, right? They said, well, the other countries

have said in the past, we don't want your antibiotics, we don't want the rest of this stuff. But they're saying, well, it's a difficulty in differentiating infected from vaccinated animals. Because if you vaccinate them and they get some antibodies for this, that's how they test to see if the bird is sick. So it's going to be a non-starter for any of that stuff. So fortunately, that is stopping it at the moment. But it's about to change because the pharmaceutical industry now owns Europe. The EU is under their thumb.

And you have agriculture ministers in the European Union in May now saying we need to vaccinate. So just like censorship, uh, just like the destruction of farms or this bogus nitrogen fear, we got to be afraid of nitrogen. We got to be afraid of CO2. We got to be afraid of coals. They go with the things that are the most common things and make them a MacGuffin for control. And so it's in the Netherlands, of course, where they are focusing on stamping out the disease. We've got to eradicate the disease. We're going to have to vaccinate the birds.

We've heard over the past few years more and more rumblings of, okay, we need to vaccinate, we need to vaccinate, said the EU leader. So they said, now this is being pushed by the World Organization for Animal Health. As they point out, it's the veterinary counterpart to the World Health Organization. So same MO, same MO. Same MO. The European Union bureaucrats working with World Health Organization or their veterinary counterpart are going to ram this thing through. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us.

Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com We'll see you next time. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Let's all go to the lobby. Let's all go to the lobby. Let's all go to the lobby. Let's all go to the lobby to get ourselves a treat.

Delicious things to eat. The popcorn can't be beat. The sparkling drinks are just dandy. The chocolate bars and the candy. So let's all go to the lobby to get ourselves a treat. Let's all go to the lobby to get ourselves a treat. Do you really want these people to be able to hack into your brain?

That has been the goal of the CIA from the very beginning. Remember, I just played a repeat of that interview that I did for the book, Sidney Gottlieb, and how the CIA has always searched for ways to control your mind. Well, they're talking about not just controlling your mind, but controlling everything in your body, turning you into a zombie robot. So these corporations, a lot of them now have been, they've gotten money from DARPA.

Some of the people who are running DARPA, former director of the Biological Technologies Office at DARPA, some of the people who are running DARPA, former director of the Biological Technologies Office at DARPA, which is Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. These are the people who are doing this, and you should be very concerned about this, because this is about, this is something that is coming for the purpose of war, war with us. This administration has just hired 80,000 more IRS agents.

About eight times, I think seven times the number that they have now. They just added seven times more. It's exploding. So, yeah, many of them are looking at ways that they can intrude into our minds. Working on a film-like sensor that sits on top of the brain and is inserted through a tiny slit in the skull. Well, when we talk about how this is going to be done, then it starts to get a little bit messy, doesn't it?

You know, he says, well, we'll put a chip in a human six months time. Well, if you look at what they have done in terms of the monkeys that they've had, some of the people who are animal rights people, Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine has just released, as he was coming up with this show and tell presentation, they just released a website that has hundreds of pages of public records talking about the suffering that these animals went through from sloppy experiments. And the reason that this is public is because between 2017 and 2020, they paid University of California, Davis, about one and a half million dollars in order to be able to use their facilities and other things like that. And now this group of people sued and got the information turned over to them so they could see what was happening in these experiments. What they saw were chronic infections, you know, from going through penetrating the skull,

using these probes to implant things, chronic infections, seizures, paralysis, internal bleeding, and declining psychological health before the monkeys were killed. In two separate incidents, the experimenters filled holes in monkeys' skulls with an unapproved adhesive, which seeped through the animal's brains. And one monkey, the adhesive caused bleeding in her brain. She vomited so much from the resulting side effects that she developed open sores in her esophagus. Well, who knows what they use? Maybe this, you know, run down and get some great stuff or something. You know, it keeps expanding on, um,

on the new website. They've got stories in detail of eight monkeys. If your stomach is up for it, it's in graphic detail. When it comes to neural link, Elon Musk is just another modern Pete, modern day PT Barnum said the director of research advocacy with a physician's committee. He is a showman who makes big promises while hiding the grisly details from the public.

And we're pulling back the curtain on him. Well, again, a lot of showmanship involved with this, always with Elon Musk. I see him as kind of a combination of Steve Jobs and all the fascination that surrounded him and Donald Trump. I think he's a combination of those two things. But the really disturbing thing is his and DARPA's long-term vision of control, surveillance, and Elon Musk's vision for humanity that is even more frightening than what happened to these monkeys. And that is his transhumanist vision. And that is a future that leads to surveillance and slavery. It is a future that has been heavily financed by DARPA

and the defense industry. history. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com We'll see you next time. Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Germany is now the largest meat importer in Europe

because they're shutting down internal production. And so one of the managers of the slaughterhouse said, we are now at a point where we can calculate when we will no longer be able to provide ourselves with meat. We now know that they can see this trend going. They're trying to shut everything down for everybody. They're pretty upfront about all that stuff. But he says, now we can see the timeline, when it's going to happen.

Who's going to stand in the gap and stop this? Well, actually, it's going to get much worse. Take a look at what's happening in the netherlands and again in the netherlands they've taken the lead in terms of shutting down farm production and shutting down cash these two things right very important to them and so when you look at what is happening in the netherlands uh this article from dutchnews.nl follow the stink police uncover cross-border manure fraud it's just like the war on drugs except they're not worried about fentanyl coming across the border or cocaine or you know crack cocaine that was created by the cia

uh they're not worried about that stuff coming across. No, they're worried about that other excrement, right? Yeah, this is the policies, just like the war on drugs, are pure BS. Dutch and Belgian police raided addresses across several different ones, five different areas, on Thursday, yesterday, in a major case of international manure management fraud. They're going to make fertilizer a controlled substance. That's what this is.

They've made fertilizer a controlled substance. When they set up these precedents, right? That's how this happens. 17 people were arrested in Belgium. Documents and property were confiscated in a joint operation, which included Europol and Dutch food watchdog NVWA. The Belgian prosecution office said 24 farms, food companies, and manure processing companies near Antwerp had been raided,

one of which was active in the Netherlands as well. Oh, it's not that white stuff anymore they're after. It's that brown stuff. Farmers and companies involved. My son says, are they going gonna have manure sniffing dogs oh you bet the dogs will be sniffing that that's uh you're not gonna be able to stop them from that it'll be pretty easy to find you won't even have to train them they just come after it naturally exponentially uh farmers and companies involved are suspected of colluding the falsified figures about the amount of manure now look this is not the babylon b this is not satire unfortunately this is where we are today and you know they have said we're going to shut down 90 of the farms in

the netherlands and and it really is focused on this and so now farmers and to try to keep things going they're having to smuggle in fertilizer manure manure that is being transported and used on the land of all things by manipulating the figures they said the amount of phosphor and nitrogen are not being kept within the prescribed maximum. These farmers are upping production by using more manure than is allowed.

How dare them produce more food with more fertilizer? We've got to stop that. In 2017, the NRC reported that two-thirds of manure management companies in Oost Brabant and Noord Limburg. I love the way they do that. Oost is east and Noord is north, right?

So East Brabant and North Limburg had been involved in some way in fraudulent actions. The largest manure management advisory agency in Lindbergh, they've got a manure management advisory agency. I mean, this is absolutely criminal, and it is a big threat, and it's going to happen. You can hear my voice. Some great ones. My son says, dung runners. That's what you get when you combine gun runners with drug runners, right?

You get dung runners. The largest manure management advisory agency is currently on trial for falsifying documents to help farmers duck manure prohibitions. This is the insanity. They're saying farmers and fertilizer companies are suspected of colluding. Well, they're going to be charged with what? Conspiracy. Conspiracy to grow food. This is coming to us.

We laugh at this, but this is where this is coming. Take a look at what this article from the UK sent to me, urgent warning to gardeners as soil increases the risk of killer heart disease. So, yeah, this is coming from the sun. The people are usually talking to you about the alien monkey that Hillary Clinton just adopted or something like that. But this is, you know, we've got all these people dying from heart disease. You know what it is?

It's the fact that they're gardening. So don't do that. Don't grow your own food. And they're not talking about people having a heart attack because strenuous labor. No, they're saying it's the soil, the soil, the ground is going to kill you. Not the mRNA injections, not the genetic code injections. No, the soil will kill you. So, you know, take your mRNA, GCI, but don't grow your own food. Don't work in the sunshine in your garden.

Don't get any fresh air. It'll kill you. As a matter of fact, they even say the soil is so bad and dangerous in your garden that if you must grow your own food, you should wear a mask. So now you've got to distance yourself from the soil. We should call it, I guess, instead of social distancing, soil distancing. Practice soil distancing and wear a mask. Why?

Because they said there's pollutants in the soil that could have a detrimental effect on the cardiovascular system. Why have they never talked about this before? They're coming up with one excuse after the other to say, well, you know, it's not the jabs killing people with heart attacks. It's the soil. You know, don't go outside. The soil will kill you.

Just stay inside and take your jab. People, experts, recommend that people wear a face mask if they are in close contact with the soil i mean they really said that the sun uh.co.uk and the netherlands of course they are you know restricting the use of cash making it a crime to do it while taking the lead. Mark Ruta and his government, Mark Ruta, one of these Klaus Schwab, and Nazi princes, and they are Nazis.

I mean, this whole thing is just a Nazi takeover. And we go back and you look at the EU for example, right? And you look at Bilderberg, just a brief recap of that history. A Bilderberg took place at the Bilderberg Hotel. That's why they call it Bilderberg. Their first meeting was 10 years to the day after the final victory of the Nazis there. If you've ever seen the movie A Bridge Too Far,

the Operation Market Garden, they were betrayed. Many people believe that the secrets were betrayed by Prince Bernhardt, who was a Nazi spy, they believe. And a British officer refused to go in and offer reinforcements. And the two of them were the ones who had the first Bilderberg meeting 10 years to the day after the last Nazi victory. And the two of them had played a key role in making sure that the Nazis won. One of the first things that they did, orders of business at Bilderberg,

was to not just talk about a common market in Europe, but to talk about a central currency, the EU. The lessons that the Nazis learned, and I include Klaus Schwab, and he is literally a Nazi. He's not just a James Bond villain. He is literally a Nazi. Nazi family, he's literally a fascist Nazi. And what is the central idea behind the world economic forum?

Well, it's economics. And what they have done in order to take over Europe and Germany is the elephant in the room dictating policy in the EU, doing it with the strength of the economy, but also enforcing all of this centrally. What they've done with the EU, Klaus Schwab is trying to do with the world. Today Europe, tomorrow the world, right? And Germany will be Uber always with these economic issues. The Common Man The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose

what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com. We'll see you next time. The roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie If you're vaccinated, you're not going to be hospitalized you're not going to be in icu unit and you're not going to die you're okay you're not going to you're not going to get covid if you have these vaccinations yeah it's kind of funny in retrospect what's even funnier is that Ben Shapiro says he was deceived. He now realizes that what he was told by Gates, by Walensky, by Rachel Maddow, by NBC, by Biden, by Fauci, Fauci, Fauci, Fauci, and also by Trump, by Trump.

He realizes that that was now a lie. He was deceived. Ben, you had one job. For the last 959 days, this lie has been used to lock us down. This lie has been used to push passports, globalist Chinese-style communist passports. It has been used to take everything away from us and hand it back as a privilege.

And you thought it was real? You're not that stupid. I wonder if your listeners are. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Yeah, Ben Shapiro is not dumb, but maybe his listeners are. He's long been a strong advocate for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines,

believing that it was the socially responsible thing to do to save Grandma, to slow or to prevent or to stop the spread. I mean, you want to stop it right there with you. You get your vaccine because we want you to be the dead end. He actually said that. We want you to literally be the dead end. We want to sterilize you. We want to kill you rapidly or slowly.

We want you to be the dead end. He believed that. Shapiro said that like many others, he had been deceived about the vaccines. You know, there are some people who have been deceived by it. I think honestly, Franklin Graham doesn't come across to me as the brightest guy, but regardless, he's not a news guy. He's not a news guy. He had pericarditis. He had to have open art surgery.

They had to remove the exterior sack around his heart because it was going to stop his heart. And yet, he doesn't talk about it. Why is that? The light has not gone off? I could believe that about Franklin Graham. I mean, he doesn't, again,

he's not somebody who hangs out in the news. He could be easily deceived. He could still be gaslighted by his own doctors into thinking that had nothing to do with the vaccine maybe he doesn't read the news ben shapiro lives in the news come on seriously you just now 959 days you figure this mean, this was obvious from the minute the executive order for lockdown went out because it practices for 20 years. Ben, you didn't realize that he said on Tuesday on his show, the Ben Shapiro show,

which by the way, still on YouTube, right? They don't have a problem with somebody who pushed the vaccine for him for a thousand days. I got a problem with me. He said, it's now perfectly clear that we were lied to, and it's now safe for him to say this on YouTube.

And we were lied to at a very high level. And from very, very early on, by both the vaccine companies in terms of the ability of the vaccine to prevent transmission. Well, that's what a vaccine is all about, isn't it supposed to be? And by politicians who apparently knew better says,

Ben go all the Shazam. Yeah. You know, that's exactly what I heard from Jake Tapper when I engaged him on Twitter. And I said, you reported that Sam Hyde did this shooting. And Jake Tapper came back and said, well, I was told that by a congressman. And we reported what the congressman said. And I told Jake Tapper, I said, that what the congressman said and i told jake tapper i said

that's the problem with you and cnn you report whatever the authorities tell you to do without looking and bothering to look whether or not it's true and then he blocked me but anyway um so yeah he said uh he was you know he lied to, deceived by politicians at very high levels who probably knew what was going on for the last thousand days, but Ben Shapiro didn't know. Shapiro took issue with the possibility that the Biden administration, it wasn't the Trump administration, understand. The Biden administration knew as much over a year ago, but it nevertheless stood by its original narrative.

He said, quote, it turns out the Biden White House knew this and they promoted the lie anyway. This is truly amazing stuff, he said. Well, here's a newsflash for you, Ben. I hate to break this to you, but your hero Trump did as well. You know, Ben Shapiro was not about supporting candidate Trump. You remember that? He did not support candidate Trump when candidate Trump was saying the right things. But when President Trump

started doing all the wrong things, that was when Ben Shapiro became a big fan. He had a lot of people in the conservative press. Once he started doing the wrong thing, started falling behind him. Now he's still silent about Trump, isn't he? Because he's still slanting the truth for an agenda. He's still slanting the truth for views. He doesn't want to criticize Trump. The time has come for him to back back away from the vaccine. And that's what Alex was doing when he tried to back away from Trump. Of course,

he's now back to loving Trump again. But, you know, he criticized Trump multiple times. Why? I just can't follow him in because the vaccine thing took him a long time to say that. So I guess the question is now, so what is the solution been? And Alex, all you guys who are back and forth and back and forth, you know, you're, you're in this difficult position because Trump loves it. Trump says I'm the father of the vaccine. Well, that's stretching it a bit. He's a father of the vaccine. Well, that's stretching it a bit.

He's a producer of the vaccine, uh, the director of the creators that has a long genealogy of other people who've been involved in this, unfortunately, but, but what needs to be done now? So, so here's a question, Ben, what do we do with the FDA? What do we do with the CDC? What do we do with the FDA? What do we do with the CDC? What do we do with the NIH, the WHO? What do we do about executive orders? What do we do about this legal immunity going back to 1986 or the PrEP Act?

What do we do about any of that stuff? What do we do, Ben, about the mandates and the passports that were based on the fear of a non-existent pandemic and the lies about the safety and efficacy of a bioweapon the vaccine what do we do about that now i mean should should there be some i mean you know you were deceived and and now you you know the vaccine is bad should we stop it should we stop it right now? Or should we just take the position that the GOP politicians are, which is, well, I'm not going to tell anybody what to do. I'm not going to tell you you can't have it. I may not buy it and provide it to you, says DeSantis.

The other governors will. They'll buy it, provide it for free. But they're not going to tell you that you can't do it. They're not going to come out against a continuous murder campaign for money. They're hired killers. They're part of the pharmakia. Their hands are dirty, just like your hands, Bill. I've been.

So if you've got something that is killing people, maybe you want to come out and oppose it. But, of course, they didn't oppose the MMR shots and still don't, which are killing 11 kids per year. These flu shots and MMR shots have injured three hundred twenty four thousand people over the last thirty years according to VAERS that number is probably anywhere from according to Harvard Harvard said well that number is reported under reported only one percent of them are reported. So Harvard says 100 times that. We had another study that was

done more recently that said it was 40 times that. Some people say it's only 5 times that. But we shouldn't worry about that because we don't want to come out and ruffle any feathers about these politicians because that's where your bread is buttered the common man they created common core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.

And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. 5G towers that are appearing all of a sudden everywhere without any warning and the residents are very upset about it because they're very very very close close to them less than 10 feet in many cases some of the people waking up and looking out their window and now all they see is this 5G tower looming into their window. Yeah, that's what it looks like. Big thing. They're about 30 feet tall and a very close to the buildings. And so this has created a lot of angst and anger in New York city over the 5g wireless

things. And, um, the residents are getting together and complaining to their elected representatives and they say, well, our hands are tied. We've got a contract. This is being done by a private company, and there's nothing we can do about it. And then there's like a federal law that's there that there's nothing we can do about it. It's like, oh, really? Where is that in the Constitution?

The gray column topped by a perforated casing is a whopping 32 feet tall, higher than a three-story brick building in some cases, the ones that they're built right next to. 60-year-old Marion Little, who owns a hardware store that's operated on the corner for 17 years, said that he and his neighbors had received no warning. One day there were workers outside, and then the new tower materialized. We were shocked because we had no idea what it was.

And this is part of LinkNYC, which is going to provide free internet service to people in New York City. And that's all you need to know. You're going to get really fast free internet. So why would you care about any radiation or health issues? Just put it up. We don't need to do any tests. They admit that they haven't done any radiation tests with it. So they're going to put 2,000 of these, and they're popping up all over the place.

90% of them are going to be in the underserved areas of the city. So they're going to give free radiation to the poor. Isn't that nice of them are going to be in the underserved areas of the city. So they're going to give free radiation to the poor. Isn't that nice of them? The residents will have access to free radiation. I mean free high-speed internet. Maybe they need to start talking about radiation without representation. You know, we've got taxation without representation. We've got regulation without representation. Now we've got radiation without representation. They said some have expressed unfounded fears about 5G. Well, are they unfounded? Well, they claim that, you know, they are unfounded,

but they also admit that they haven't been tested. Just down the street, a 50-year-old Brooklynite who said her family is four generations deep in the neighborhood, who serves as a Democratic liaison to the 57th Assembly District, says she has been wary of the tower since it first appeared this summer. She said, never have I heard one mention of residents asking for the tower to be placed where we live. Again, it's not in my backyard. And since they don't have yards, they put it right against the window.

And it isn't like these things don't have a history. For the longest time, we've seen, especially for children, we have seen that cell phone tower clusters, just the other types of cell phone towers, they would frequently put cell phone tower clusters next to schools. Oh, because, you know, they owned the property and there's a lot of vacant property there. They could do whatever they wanted to. They're going to be putting a lot of these 5G towers on traffic lights and things like that. You know, because, hey, we've got the traffic light here. We can do whatever we want to with it. Well, they were doing that with the schools.

And then they started noticing cancer clusters and lawsuits began. And then their defense was to come back and say, well, we have permission from the feds to do this. And you can't stop us. So anyway, she was saying, I don't know who wants this. She said, before this tower came, I had perfectly fine service. Most of them are complaining about the appearance of the thing. They think it's ugly. They don't like the fact that it blocks their window right up against the window. The towers are not the only 5G antennas that are going up. They're going to be putting them on street lights as well as the traffic lights.

But they quote a person who, first of all, talks about the FCC. They said, even though they're three stories high, more than 30 feet in the air, it's also just steps away from where one couple has their five-month-old baby sleeping. Yeah, no problem. Just have the baby sleeping right next to a cell phone antenna. But again, these are different, and we don't know what the different frequencies are going to do. So in this article, they talked to a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He said 5G is non-ionizing radiation, and it's on the opposite end of the spectrum from ionizing rays

that people need protection from, like x-rays. Well, that's irrelevant. It really doesn't matter. Simple fact of the matter is they haven't done any biological testing on the effects of these things. It doesn't matter that they're on a different end of the spectrum than x-rays. It doesn't matter if they're non-ionizing. Perhaps he's never heard of Alan Fry and the Fry effect. This is a guy who was working for the U.S. Navy. I've mentioned this story many working for the U.S. Navy. I've mentioned this story many times, but I'll mention it again.

Maybe some people didn't hear it. In the same way that they discovered microwave radiation, what does microwave radiation do? Well, it heats up meat, right? It can cook you. It can cook your internal organs just like it cooks food if you don't shield it. The first microwave ranges were called radar ranges by Amana. Why do they call them radar ranges?

Well, because some of these technicians who were working for the military put their coffee on top of these microwave transmitters, and they realized that their coffee was getting hot. And then they discovered that the microwave radiation could heat up the coffee. And then they made microwave ovens out of it. Well, a similar thing happened with Alan Fry. It was a completely different frequency. And different frequencies have different effects on our body. Alan Fry's assistant realized, in the same way these radar assistants realized that the microwave was heating up their coffee,

he started hearing clicking sounds and cricket sounds and things like that. And he reported it to Alan Fry, and Alan Fry started investigating it. At that frequency, it was inducing electrical signals into the auditory nerves that the brain perceived as actually being heard. And so these different frequencies have different effects. And so Alan Fry spent a lot of his time looking at biological effects of electromagnetic radiation. He's the only person to do it. They didn't stop him from doing it because it would have been, I guess,

perceived as a cover-up. And in those days, they weren't so bold from doing it because it would have been, I guess, perceived as a cover-up. And in those days, they weren't so bold about doing cover-ups. But they didn't ever fund anybody else to do that kind of research, even though he showed quite a bit about its effects. And one of the reasons I started talking about this was because of the Havana syndrome. People started talking about they were hearing clicks and things like that. And I said, well, it sounds like the Fryavana syndrome. People started talking about, they were hearing clicks and things like that. I said, well, it sounds like the Frye effect. And it probably is some form of electromagnetic radiation.

And so, you know, that is something they should test, but they admit that they haven't done it. They just respond and say, you'll get used to it as long as you live, however long that is. Ms. Formica and her next-door neighbor, she's the one that had the young child that now is going to have a transmitting antenna right next to it,

they took a measuring tape to the sidewalk and they discovered the newly installed pole is slightly less than 10 feet away from the building. That is a distance that typically triggers a community notification process. So if you put something less than 10 feet away from the building, then there's supposed to be some additional oversight. And I said, we don't care. We're just going to sweep that aside because we want to do 5G. Who was it that has been the biggest cheerleader of 5g? Oh, that's right. Donald Trump.

Another one of these things, right? Always there, always there for the vaccines, for the 5g, all the rest of the stuff as well. Uh, so anyway,

she contacted local representatives, uh, handed out flyers, urging neighbors to do the same. They would like to see the antennas removed or at least moved across the street. Not in my backyard night on my sidewalk, not right next to me is what they're saying. They would like to see the antennas removed or at least moved across the street. Not in my backyard, not on my sidewalk, not right next to me is what they're saying.

But none of that is going to happen. The people have replied, even though one person said, yeah, it's less than 10 feet away from my room, from my kid. It's also, we have a resident who has a pacemaker. And the manufacturer, medical device company, says that you got to stay at least 10 feet away from the pole at all times. So she says, so this is putting that person at risk as well, covering up their view. And then some of them, to bolster their cases, took pictures of the box that was a part of this antenna and it had a sticker on it uh says uh danger don't get too close to this type of thing right so they called the city and said look it's even got a sticker on it here's a

picture it's got a sticker on it warning about being in close proximity to it why would they put that on there you know for the same reason that apple and all these cell phone companies put in the fine print warning about you know don't put this phone up next to your head you're not going to read it and so when they took a picture of this sticker on the box and called the government to report it, the government responded by sending out a work crew to take the sticker off. That's what they did. The residents were told that the technicians were only there to take the sticker down.

So they came and they took the sticker down and that's all they're going to do. You'll get used to it. I'll take the sticker away so that it doesn't get you concerned. So the city comes back and says, no, our hands are tied. The federal government says we don't have any authority to remove this. Where did they come up with that idea? In 1996, the Telecommunications Act, done by the Clinton administration, said that we can put cell phone antennas anywhere we want and you can't stop us.

Well, of course, that's not constitutional. They have no authority under the 10th Amendment. No authority was explicitly given to them to do that type of thing. And since it wasn't given to them explicitly, it was retained by the states and by the people. And you cannot impose those types of things on us, but nobody wants to talk about the 10th Amendment. And that was interesting that it was done 10 years after Reagan and Fauci put out the legal immunity

for the vaccine companies. So then 10 years later, they said, we're going to do the same thing for the telecommunication companies. And they did. And so then it got compounded by the fact that new york city signed a contract with this company for putting these things up and the people who are the press local press and new york city is upset for the small amount of money that they charge them to be able

to put these antennas up because then they're going to sell, they're going to rent the antenna locations to the various internet providers like AT&T and others and make a lot of money. So they're concerned about all those types of things. But again, they said, well, federal regulations significantly restricted municipalities and local authorities when regulating the locations of towers and local communities. Therefore, we have no legal authority to mandate the removal of the tower. So when you have local officials who say that,

you need to remove those officials and then remove the towers. They even came back and said, well, we haven't even tested these things yet. So we don't know that they're harmful because they haven't even been tested yet. Well, how do you know they're safe if you admit that they haven't been tested? And they're not violating the amount of radiation, we think, but we haven't really looked at it yet. And, of course, that's going to be, radiation is going to be increasing the closer you get to it, right?

Radiation falls off by a square of the distance. So if you're right up next to an antenna, you're going to be getting a lot more. If they have something that is strong enough that it's going to connect with people far away, when you're very close, you're going to be getting exponentially more radiation, but they don't care about any of that stuff. The common man.

They created common core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com I suspect my take on this is that it's going to roll out sometime in 2023 or 2024. And the reason I say that, Gerald, is because Brazil has announced their timeframe. They've got a pilot program right now that is for wholesale. And it's just a little bit ahead of the announced pilot program from the Federal Reserve. But of course, they were already working on this. They probably already

had the code written because immediately after they got their six-month report, they start their pilot program. And their pilot program is very similar to what's being done in Brazil. And then they're going wholesale, and then they're going to roll it out retail to people at the end of 2023 or 2020 into 2024. I think we're going to be on the same timeframe. And I say that, Gerald, because look at how everybody has been synced up on all this COVID stuff. And just like Biden and Trudeau on the borders, and hey, you can't cross the border unless you're vaccinated, truckers, and we're going to make that rule apply in two months. It's like, well, if this is an emergency, you do it now, right? They just roll these things out. They've all, all of them working on the same timeframe.

You could see it when they started mandating the vaccines. You could see how Biden was on the same timeframe as Macron and all these other leaders in September. So they're working on a global agenda and they've all got the same timetable. This is the first time we've seen somebody come up with a specific date for when they're going to roll it out of the Western nations coming out of Brazil. So I'm thinking that, you know, we're only about a year away. All right. And joining us now is Eric Peters. I've been very anxious to talk to Eric over the last couple of days. We were scheduled to have an interview on Friday, but it was out of electricity, out of power. And I

thought that's interesting because he's got a couple of, uh, you know, brand new Ford vehicles, one of them, the F-150 lightning truck and the other one, the Mustang. And so, uh, welcome, uh, Eric. And, uh, tell us a little bit about what's been going on as you're trying to review electric cars and you lose power. Yeah, well, you know, it gave me some insight into what it's actually like to live with one of these things. As it happened, we had an ice storm that rolled through the area and that knocked the power out. And, of course, that meant that I couldn't charge the thing at home. And that was problematic because prior to that, prior to the power going out, I had driven it around just a little bit and it had winnowed down the range to not very much

and so it was necessary to plug the thing in. But the power went out. So if I hadn't had another vehicle to drive that wasn't electric, I would have been stranded. And I have discovered over the course of driving electric vehicles now for the past couple of weeks that unlike every other vehicle I've ever driven in the past 25-something years, I can only drive the thing basically every other day because of this lag time that occurs in between having to these things at home any faster than in a couple of hours. That's using a 240-volt dedicated circuit. And you have to have an electrician come out to run a dedicated circuit from your panel to do that. And that's going to cost you a significant amount of money. And if your house only has a 100-amp panel, you're going to have to get your panel upgraded. And that's going to potentially cost you as much as $3,000 when all is said and done.

And people are not being told about this. And what it winds up being is that my ability to drive has been winnowed down by about half, and I think that's ultimately what they want with these electric vehicles. Yeah, you don't have to go anywhere. Who are you? Why would you? Are you a government official or something? Or you work for a bureaucracy?

Why would you need to go anywhere? You're going to stay within a 15 minute area here. You'll be able to walk anywhere you want to go. And we'll have this all set up like the village, like the prisoner, you know, Patrick. It is such a contrast with my 20 year old gas powered truck. I always keep at least one five gallon jug of gas on hand in case the power goes out, in case I forgot to put gas in the truck. I can just pour that five gallons of gas in the truck. You cannot do that with an electric vehicle. There's no practical way to store the energy equivalent of five gallons of gas

and just keep it in a shed somewhere. So if you haven't charged it and if you have no means to charge it, you're stuck. You know, I remember you had an electric vehicle a few years ago that you liked. Of course, they've discontinued it, the Chevy Volt, because they claimed, well, it's not a zero-emission vehicle because it's got a motor that is used as a generator, essentially, to drive the battery. But they took that off the market. You know, you wouldn't have had this problem if you had

had some kind of a hybrid like that. Yeah, now that was only 99.99999% clean. So that was unacceptable. And essentially what it was, was an automotive equivalent of a diesel electric locomotive. Diesel electric locomotives have a diesel engine that provides the power that runs the electric motors that propel the vehicle. So you carry along your generator with you, and it's a good solution. And it really worked well. And so, of course, they had to get rid of it. Yeah, yeah. Well, tell us a little bit about your reviews. You got detailed reviews of the F-150, and you had some preliminary information last time I looked on the Mustang. Maybe you've got

another article. Yeah, I just posted the full-length review about that actually this morning, so it's available for anybody who'd like to check it out. I found out a number of very interesting things. That's at epautos.com, so they can find out those things. Yeah. Even for me, I try to keep abreast of these things, and yet there were things about it that I wasn't aware of until I actually, for example, looked at the owner's manual of a Lightning pickup truck. I pawed through that, and right there in the owner's manual, it says that you're encouraged to not use one of those commercial fast chargers because that is likely to cause the battery to not last as long as it otherwise would. And, of course, the battery in an electric car is the most expensive component in the vehicle. So, you know, you're in

this paradoxical situation of in order to be able to use the vehicle in any kind of practical way, you kind of have to go to these fast chargers. Otherwise, you're going to literally be waiting overnight to recover any charge. But if you use the fast charger, the commercial grade, a high voltage fast chargers, well, then you're probably going to have to buy a battery pretty soon. And the battery costs so much, it's not going to be worth doing. So that was just one of the many things that I learned after living with the, uh, the lightning for a week. Yeah. And, and, um, yeah, it's kind of interesting because, you know, you'd look at, as these things have kind of grown out of, um, you know, uh, cell phones and computers and other things like that that have batteries

in them. And in many cases, they make the, many manufacturers of the phones make them such that you can't really get to the battery very easily to replace it. You're just kind of used to the fact that, all right, I'm just going to throw it away because it's already kind of old anyway, right? And so now whether it's a device and it's an old device, I've had this for a few years, I really want to spend any more money changing the battery if I can change the battery? Or I just get a new one.

And that's kind of that planned obsolescence is what they're now doing with this. But we're talking about something that's $50,000 for this trucking up, right? That's for the base trim version of it. And by the way, the price of that went up about $8,000. Remember when they were telling us that electric vehicles were going to get cheaper because battery technology was going to get more sophisticated? In fact, the opposite is happening. It's not just the lightning. You know, Ford has raised the price substantially of all of its electric vehicles. So has Tesla. And the reason for that is that the materials that go into the battery, you know, are expensive.

And the demand for them, the artificial demand that's being imposed by all of these mandates, is causing relative shortages of these things. And so the price is going up. And so now we're in this situation where these electric vehicles, which they want to put on the mass market, are becoming effectively exotic vehicles that only, in terms of the price, that only really affluent people can afford to buy, which I kind of think is what they ultimately want. Yes, they only want a few people to have the cars. And as you and I have talked about, they're destroying the grid at the same time. So there's not going to be enough. And we've already seen this in California.

Don't charge your electric cars on the grid because we're having a power issue and so forth. And we're going to see that at the end of the week. You've got a lot of cold weather coming through Texas and other places. It's going to put a big strain on the grid. You'll probably see some other places saying, don't charge your electric cars. But when you talk about the battery, that simply is an issue of the government

trying to force the technology on people. If this thing were to grow organically and the market would start to react, okay, so there's a demand, let's say, for a particular type of car and a new battery. And so as that demand starts pulling stuff in, if they start to have shortages of materials to make the minerals that they need to make these batteries, then that would raise the prices and demand would kind of back off. But then they would build that up. And so both of the things would start to grow together.

But when the government comes in, starts mandating this for everybody, everybody has to go to that all of a sudden, and the supply chains aren't there. And then they mandate the shutdown of the power into the grid. It is a planned takedown. That's all it is of our transportation, our society, and everything. The fundamental distortion here is this insistence that EVs have to be functionally capable of doing everything that a gas engine car can do. And so in order for them, for example, to be able to go out on the highway and ostensibly be driven at, say, 70, 75 miles an hour for 150 miles, let's say, you have

to have this massive battery pack in order for that to be feasible. So that's what they're doing. They transform these vehicles into hugely impractical, hugely expensive vehicles, whereas if the government had gotten out of the way and people were free to innovate, the focus would have been on keeping them as light as possible, not worrying about highway range, not worrying about getting to 60 in 2.9 seconds, but on making it very efficient and very affordable. And that could be done. In fact, it is being done in, of all places, China china where you can pick up a basic little city ev for about five or six thousand bucks yeah yeah well of course you know the big plan is that the 15 minute plan this is happening everywhere we talked about it last time you came on and um you know in oxford and

other places they're sectioning up the city uh so you know you're not going to get outside of this area you had, you know, you're not going to get outside of this area. You had an article about it. You're not going to get outside of this area except under our permission a certain number of times, you know, over a given time interval. So you're not going to be able to do it on a daily basis. You'll use credits up to get out of your little 15-minute time zone. What they're creating, if you're familiar with the Prisoner, Patrick McGowan series.

Oh, love that show. Yeah. Yeah. Well, you know, if you have a situation like that, where you're confined there in their little dystopian utopia, then all you need is a little golf cart to go around different places. Right. And that's really where they're headed.

You know, so yeah, that's a use for the electric cars, just a little golf cart to tootle around in your 15-minute range, but you better not get outside that boundary or a rover is going to come get you, right? Yeah, there's so much serial dishonesty here, and I keep uncovering it like peeling back an onion one thing after the next. I've discovered over the course of the past couple of weeks that if you park an electric vehicle outside and it's not plugged in, when you return the next day, you will notice that you have lost a significant amount of the indicated range, as much as 20 miles. I lost 20 miles at one point of indicated range because it was cold outside.

So what that means, and they don't tell you this, is that you have to keep the thing plugged in all the time to maintain the range. Now, that draw might not be much on an individual level, but if you can imagine, hypothetically, a million electric cars that are perpetually plugged into the grid and the load demand that's going to place on the grid, leaving aside the high-voltage stuff, it's stupendous. It's staggering. Wow. Yeah, that's right.

Well, tell us a little bit about some of the aspects of it, because you did like a couple of things about the pickup truck. Tell us a little bit about the good points about it well for example you know you lift the hood there's no engine obviously because it's electric so you've got this additional storage capacity there and that's neat you know that's helpful uh you know if you drive a truck you might find that well i have to throw my groceries in the back seat or i have to put them in the bed where obviously they're not out of the weather so So that's a nice feature to have. And you've got the ability to plug in chop saws and even arc welders if you want into

these high amp outlets that are built into the bed and under the hood. Of course, the problem there is if you do that, you're going to drain the battery again so you circle back to where you were. And one of the most startling things that I found out, and this confirmed other people have done this, is a guy named Tyler Hoover who did the same test that I did, which was to hook up a relatively light trailer to the truck. The truck has a rated tow capacity of about 10,000 pounds. I hooked up a 6,000-pound trailer to it, and it devastated the range.

The indicated range plummeted by 50%, just trying to pull a 6,000-pound trailer. So it's effectively useless for the purpose that most people would want a truck for. And I think when people realize this stuff, it's going to be a disaster for Ford. Wow. That's amazing. Yeah. I had, uh, about, uh, 25 years or so ago, I had, uh, a Mercedes SUV and it was, um, and I used it to, uh, tow a really large trail that was heavily loaded. First, we took a piece of equipment that my brother-in-law sold. We drove it up all the way up the coast to Massachusetts because we wanted to get there at Thanksgiving and take a look at Plymouth Rock and things like that. So we said, all right, we'll do that.

And he paid for the fuel and stuff like that. So we did that. We didn't have any problems with it. And then we sold do that. And yeah, he paid for the fuel and stuff like that. So, uh, we did that. We didn't have any problems with it. And we, we also then, um, then we sold that car and he had an SUV that was, um,

uh, it was one of the Chrysler SUVs and, we loaded it up again and went the opposite direction. It takes some stuff down to his father, uh, in Florida. And by the time we got down there, we'd pulled the it was still under

warranty fortunately but it just destroyed the rear end uh because of that point but that was nowhere near 10 000 pounds i mean that's that's an amazing capacity it had like a it had like a four or five thousand pound towing capacity or something like that and and uh and then some of the suvs that we've seen like i I mentioned that, that Chrysler, they claimed that they had, you know, three or 4,000 pounds of towing capacity, but they really didn't. This thing has 10,000, but then you can't take it anywhere. You certainly can't take a trip all the way down to Florida, you know, from North Carolina

or go up to Massachusetts from North Carolina and back. You're not going to make it. Yeah. You know, the amount of time that you have to take. For example, I'm on good terms with the delivery drivers who bring me these vehicles, and so they tell me about their experience. And the guy who brought me down the Lightning had to stop twice along the way to charge up the vehicle so that he could keep on going. And normally, it's no problem.

It's a straight shot from the press pool up in the D.C. area to where I am in southwest Virginia. They drive straight here, put some gas in it, drop it off, that's it. So it became this odyssey for this poor guy of having to stop and wait. And by the way, here's another fun thing to find that I found out about these so-called fast chargers. And I object to the use of that term anyway, because even if you believe their storyline that, oh, you can get 80% charge in half an hour, that turns out to be bogus because not all fast chargers are created equal. As I discovered, the fast chargers that are available in my area,

I sat at one for an hour and 15 minutes to get 100 miles of range, which is the equivalent of about 5 gallons of gas. Wow. Yeah. And of course, that's assuming that you didn't have to wait in line for somebody else to do the same thing. Yeah, and there are only four slots there. So when everybody drives... They don't tell you what it costs. They don't tell you what it costs.

You go up to a gas pump and it'll say, you know, $3.75 a gallon. You put in 15 gallons and you can do some basic 6th grade math and you know what you're going to spend, right? Right. These things, they want you to download an app so, of course, that they can track you using your cell phone and God knows what else they want to do, but there is no clear way to know what you just spent. At the fast charger, if you just put your credit card in, it will tell you how many kilowatt hours you got. It will tell you how long you sat there, but I'm still waiting for my credit card statement to show up so I know how much I spent at the fast charger.

Wow. Wow. And as you pointed out, with these fast charges, when you were talking about it in your article, you said you can only take it up to 80%. And why? Tell people why that is. Well, again, it's out of due concern for the longevity of the battery and the potential for fire. Yes.

Yes. That's the point. It's about how much current can you pump through effectively a hose. Did you know they're using water cooling now because of the high heat and load that they're trying to use for these faster chargers that I think are operating at some ludicrous amount of voltage? I can't remember offhand what it is. But they do that because they don't want the thing to go up in flames, and they don't want to kill the battery.

So now you have a compounding problem because you start out with a vehicle that has relatively short range. For example, this Mach-E that I've got has a 290-mile hypothetical best-case range. Well, if you bleed it down to next to nothing and you go to a fast charger, you can only recover 80% of that. So you're starting out with an even less range. Yeah, that's amazing. And I found out in the course of driving these vehicles, and I've driven several of them now,

that unlike a gas engine car where the EPA's mileage figures are pretty accurate and pretty dependable and pretty predictable, these vary tremendously. I found that the indicated range is generally optimistic by anywhere from 10% to 20% depending on the conditions that you're driving in. Wow. Wow. Well, you know, when you talk about the fact that you've got these fast chargers and you have to limit it because of the heat that's generated and because it could catch fire and all the rest of this stuff. So you only take it up to 80% and minimize the amount of time it's on there. When I read that in your article, I started thinking about the trucks, you know, because they want to push this idea of electric semi-trailers, right? Yep. You've got a massive amount. You're talking about how much bigger the battery is in the pickup trucks. You're talking about how, yeah, this is part of the issue with the price.

You know, it starts at $48,769, but then when you get it with a platinum trim, it's pushing $100,000. It's like $96,874. And a lot of that is is the big batteries the big increase for the batteries but think about the the semi-trailers and you got somebody who's professional trucker now they're going to take it up from a supercharger to a hypercharger they're going to be pumping that through at a much much faster rate to really big batteries what's that going to do to the chances of fires?

And that's one of the reasons why I think we've seen so many fires of these buses and cities, one of them burning down the entire bus station in Stuttgart, other fires that they've shut them down in Germany and France and other places. Some places they said, just take them all off. We'll get rid of the electric thing.

We'll put diesel back in them because I think they're having so many fires. I think you're going to see that a lot with the trucks, especially because they're going to be trying to charge them even faster than they've done before. Sure, because time is money for these truckers. And you can imagine a typical truck stop where there are, what, maybe two dozen big rigs waiting to fuel up and get back on the road. And, of course, it's urgent for them to get back on the road. They don't have the time to sit around all day. So, you know, they're going to try to expedite that, which is going to compound this problem

and result in even greater probabilities of fire, leaving aside the question of how in the world are they ever going to conduit the amount of power that would be necessary to feed, say, a dozen or two dozen of these big rigs with the massive battery packs they would have. I've read it would take something comparable to powering a small town to be able to do that. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Imagine a truck stop with all these electric trucks.

You know, what are you going to do to get that kind of power in there to charge multiple ones of them? And then if one of them catches fire, I mean, can you imagine? So much for the environment, right? Exactly. Exactly. Exactly. But you know, you're talking about heat. And a couple of weeks ago, I had an engineer on who was talking about Elon Musk's Neuralink. And he said, you know, stop and think about that.

First, he started talking about the wireless earbuds, you know, that Apple has and how much radiation there is in that. But then he said, they're going to put this chip, setting it on your brain. And even the other ones that Bezos and Gates are talking about, injecting into your jugular vein instead of letting it set on top of your brain. But, you know, it's amazing. These people are just off the charts crazy. But he said, think about this. You've got to be able to recharge this thing.

And so you're going to have to recharge it with induction right and so that's more electromagnetic radiation that's hitting into your brain and then the thing what happens when you charge it it gets hot so you know you've got this thing that's getting hot it's sitting on your brain and i'm thinking yeah it's like all of this electrical stuff you're better to live with electricity, right? Yeah, you know, that just reminded me, too. Have you followed the story about AM radio being deleted from a lot of these electric vehicles because of the EMF emissions that make it essentially unusable? Yes, you had that getting rid of AM. Now, is that cross-talk that is happening, that they just didn't shield it, or it's got to to be something else because they've always had that problem, you know, with having to, uh, sometimes you can hear it in a car, especially if you do something after market, as you're speeding up the car, you hear this, this crosstalk that you get, if you've got parallel wires or something, you know, and they got electronic emission, uh, or ignition, um, you know, is that, so an electric car, it's got to be much worse than that, right? If they're just going to delete all AM radio.

Yeah, you're sitting on two, like in the case of an all-wheel drive EV, like the one that I have, two very, very large electric motors. And, of course, 1,000 pounds of batteries. And then in addition to that, you've got this gigantic LCD touchscreen that's radiating out at you. So it's generating a lot of EMF. Now, I don't know whether it's possible to shield it sufficiently. I've decided I'm going to buy a high-quality EMF detector because, you know, after all, I need to be able to tell people what's going on,

and that will help me to quantify how much EMF is actually being produced by these vehicles. That would be very interesting. You know, after we did that report with Goat Tree, the engineer, a listener posted up on Twitter, he had the equipment to measure the EMF signal and the strength, and he pulled out one earbud, and the thing goes pretty high, and he showed what it was. And you look at it, if you multiply that by two, you're getting the same amount of radiation that you get with a cell phone. And so that would be very interesting if it's generating so much EMF that they can't have an AM radio there, and you're sitting right on top of it. What are the issues with that, especially because you're inside a metal box?

And I think there's a degree of flippancy, isn't there, with regard to the government that's supposedly so very, very concerned about keeping us safe and making sure that no hazards are presented that could hurt us, just doesn't seem particularly interested in whether this is a potential problem. Just, yeah, sure, go ahead, build it, put it out there. Let's see what happens. Yeah. No, if it's on their agenda, they don't care what the health issues are. They don't care about the health issues of 5G.

They don't care about the health issues of vaccine. Forget about it. And you've got somebody that drops dead on film, and many of them, they're still not going to pay any attention to it. It's just full speed ahead. Yeah. It's amazing. And, of course, this is the same government that will warble on about how, if it saves even one life, that there's no cost too high that's not worth spending. Yeah, that's just to bid their price up.

You talk about the acceleration of this big truck and i was pretty amazed at these zeros and again you know zero to 60 was something that would the automotive industry fixed on because they could compare and so people are you know into these uh zero to 60 times and fractions of a second to competing against each other that's been a metric for a very long time. I don't think it's a very good metric of, you know, but you can't really quantify things like handling ability and stuff like that. But zero to 60, tell people what does zero to 60 and then quarter mile. Well, let's preface it by saying that the thing weighs about 6,300 pounds.

So we're talking about a lot of metal and glass and plastic. And nonetheless, because it does have such powerful electric motors and such a powerful battery, the thing is capable of getting to 60 in something crazy like four seconds. Wow. Yeah. So that's phenomenal. There's no disputing it, but I think it's a distraction. And it's also something else. These EVs are presented as being responsible, you know,

as being necessary because after all we have to conserve, we can't deplete the earth's resources. We can't emit too much of the dread inert gas, carbon dioxide, but they are gratuitous energy hogs. You know, there's no, and I'm like, I like speed. I like performance, but if we're in a crisis and you know, we have to, we have to dial back. We we have to dial back, we have to economize, what in the world are they doing producing vehicles that get to 60 in four seconds and all of the expense and the energy use that's necessary to accomplish that?

That's right. I mean, if you stop and think about that, you mentioned 6,000 pounds. I mean, this makes my parents' Cadillac in the 1970s look like a lightweight sports car when you compare the, uh, the, the weight of this thing. And you're going to haul that at 3.8 seconds, zero to 60. You said that here is a 12.4 and a quarter mile. I mean, that think about if you had something that was 6,000 pounds, the size of an engine that you would have to have on that. But, you know, we're talking about, we're talking about energy here, right? That energy has to come from somewhere.

And it's, you know, so you're, you're boiling water somewhere with coal or, uh, with, uh, nuclear power or something like that. Or maybe you've got a solar panel connection somewhere, but still you, you have to get that energy. You have to get that energy. You have to transmit it over the grid. There's losses on the grid and everything. It's still, as you point out, energy that's being consumed when you accelerate this thing.

And you're now accelerating 6,000 pounds of material instead of like my car, which is 2,000 pounds of material. Yeah, if this were really about conserving and efficiency, then we would be targeting things like just adequate acceleration, you know, getting to 16, say, eight seconds. You know, for most of the history of the car industry, that was considered a pretty quick time. That's right. And as long as it can maintain, say, 70 miles an hour on the highway, that's sufficient.

What do you need a vehicle that goes 140 or 150 miles an hour for? Again, premised with this idea that we're in some kind of an emergency and we have to conserve. In fact, what they've done with this, I think, is to create vehicles that are appealing to the uber-affluent virtue signalers who don't want to drive around in a meager little transportation appliance. They want this $100,000 vehicle that can get to 60 in 3.8 seconds, so they don't have to give up anything. It's us that are expected to give up everything. Yeah, everything is getting so much bigger, especially the trucks and stuff.

As a matter of fact, Karen and I went Christmas shopping over the weekend, and we're getting to the point now where we've got to drop a thing to find our car because even though we're not old enough that we can't remember where the car is, it's so small compared everything else out there. I mean, whether you're talking about a crossover or an SUV or a pickup truck, it keeps getting smaller and smaller because they keep getting taller and taller. And so it's like, I know it's around here somewhere, but you can't see it until you're right on top of it because it's so low compared to everything else. And everything is getting heavier, uh, and, is getting heavier and using more energy with it. It is an amazing trend that you see, but you're right. People want something that is high up.

You know, that's a selling feature. And the things that you're talking about here in terms of a lot of space, you got space in the trunk, you got space under the hood, you got outlets to drive other power stuff. And it's super fast and it looks nice. It's got, you know, they're, they're using lighting now, like they used to use Chrome in the fifties. So it looks nice and all the rest of the stuff. But I mean, you're talking about something that 50 to a hundred thousand dollars and, um, you know, it's, it's not going to be used as a, as a work truck for people. And, and that's the way, you know, people are not buying trucks for that purpose for the most part anymore.

Yep. It can't be, you know, I've got a number of friends who are contractors and business people who have trucks that they use for work and leaving aside how you feel about electric vehicles and whether you think they're cool or whether you think they're necessary, the bottom line is they would never work. I've asked my friends, could you, could you, could you use this vehicle in, in your, in your work? And absolutely not. They need to be able to get to work get work done and then get away from wherever the work is to the next job site it just it does not it doesn't square out yeah yeah i liked your bottom line on the lightning you said the lightning lives

up to its name its performance can be breathtaking but it's also gone after a flash yeah you know and i got into that too with, with this Mach-E. It's analogous to driving around something like a Challenger Hellcat with a half a tank of gas all the time. And no gas stations around. Even that's not so bad because if you have a Challenger with only half a tank of gas and you burn through that, hey, no problem. You can fill it back up to full in just a couple of minutes. But you start out with this essentially half a tank of gas in the electric vehicle, and now you have to sit and wait. And for a significant amount of time, they're trying to minimize the time wastage.

As if 30 minutes just sitting there is somehow acceptable these days. And it boggles my mind that that goes without comment so often. Yeah, it's kind of like the tortoise and the hare, isn't it? Yeah. You zip out there, and then you sit there, and you wait, and you wait, and you wait. I mean, can you imagine, best case scenario, would you have an extra half hour every day to sit around waiting for a vehicle to charge? Yeah, yeah, exactly. That's the best case.

Yeah. What else? Tell us a little bit about, since I haven't seen the review yet about the Mustang, you talked about some of the things with the truck, the charging ports, and the extra storage and stuff. So what else about the Mustang that can you tell us? How does it handle? Well, yeah, remarkably, I will say, you know, engineers are amazing people. They take a vehicle. This one weighs almost 5,000 pounds, and it's small.

It's smaller in terms of its footprint than a Mustang, and a Mustang's really not that much bigger than your Miata. So, you know, this is a relatively small vehicle. It would be considered a compact crossover if you went by the dimensions of it, and it weighs nearly 5,000 pounds before you get inside the thing. So that's a lot of weight, and to get that weight under control is quite a task, and they've done a phenomenal job of that. The handling is quite good for a vehicle that heavy,

and the performance is absolutely breathtaking, no question. But it's also kind of anodyne in that nothing really happens. You floor it, and the thing just rushes forward. There's no sound unless you push the little button. There's a sound. You can make it manufacture sound, the sound of a V8 engine, if you want it. Though, of course, there is no V8 engine there. So they did the same thing that Dodge did with the Hellcat.

They simulated a V8 sound? Yes, exactly. There's a little thing you can scroll up, and you can make it make a sound. Now, on the upside, the thing is a fairly practical vehicle in terms of the same things that make crossovers so popular. It's got a lot of room for the size. It's got a usable backseat, which the Mustang does not. It's got five times the room for cargo in it than the Mustang has. The Mustang is a personal car.

It's not really suitable for a family, for example. It's a second car. It's a toy car. It's not really suitable for a family, for example. It's a second car. It's a toy car. The Mach-E could conceivably be a family car, provided you're not in a hurry to go anywhere. I had my first car was a 68 Mustang, and the back seat was an unbelievable joke. Even a small child couldn't fit back there. It was essentially a two-seater car. It fits for gym bags. Yeah, exactly, exactly.

You got another no-net driving, the article where you talk about what happens in the winter with the driver assist. Tell people about that. Yeah, well, this tied into the ice storm. The vehicle was shellacked with ice, and so I got into drive. And as soon as I started rolling, the little warning light came on in the dashboard telling me that the safety systems had been disabled because the cameras that are the fundamental component of these safety systems that they have peppered out throughout the exterior of the vehicle could not see anymore. They could not get data about the external world. So, you know, and that's fine for me because I know how to drive and I don't need, I don't need assistance from a computer.

Just like I don't need a wheelchair to walk. But this whole generation of people who have been raised now, like I'd say probably for the last 20 years, to have the car provide the safety net. You know, now you've got this issue of, well, what are they going to do when their safety technology net isn't there anymore and they don't know what to do? They're not paying attention, they're pecking at their cell phone, and they drive right into the car ahead of them

because they were expecting the advanced safety technology to break for them. Yeah, that's right. You have the discussion going on right now, you know, oh, we got to get the, we got to get the trucks. So they're, they're taking this stuff off the hands of the long haul drivers and that type of thing. And so they're going back and forth talking about how ridiculous it is to expect that you're going to be able to, in an emergency that the vehicle can't handle, somehow throw it back to the human driver. Who's there as a fallback position. You know, they're there, they've gone to sleep.

They're playing games or looking at their phone or whatever. The same stuff that we saw with, uh, the, uh, human driver that was there on the, uh, self-driving Uber and Phoenix when she ran over that woman, right. And, and she, she's just sitting there because everything is fine for the longest period of time. Then all of a sudden something unexplained happens and she doesn't even know what's going on. And so they, they want to do this on, on the road with, um, these, these giant trucks,

uh, which is, and so then they say, well, maybe what we'll do is, uh, just with the areas where the trucks do better, you know, is not around town. Around town, we'll just have the humans driving. And then on the road, we'll have this type of situation. So now you've got a truck that is barreling down the highway at 70 or 80 miles an hour. And it is going to have a situation where there's an unexpected something happening. And, again, the truck driver is not going to be able to cover that thing in that amount of time there's this contempt behind all of this for the capacity of us human beings to

deal with situations so we're all to be infantilized and our lives and everything else to be turned over to ai into computers that will take care of things for us, rendering us a bunch of helpless, pathetic illoy, you know, from the novel by H.G. Wells, The Time Machine. Another good reference point to help understand this, I think, is do you remember Demolition Man? Yeah, yeah. The Sylvester Stallone movie,

and they broke Stallone out of ice. He'd been in suspended animation for a long time because the cops of the future were too helpless and couldn't deal with a real criminal. So they needed to resurrect him in order to handle it. And that's probably what they're going to have to do with vehicles. Find somebody from the before time who actually knows how to drive a stick shift, for example. Well, you know, I've got this article here talking about the rise of the robot truckers. This is from Wired Magazine. Of course,

any technology is just great. You know, we don't ever second guess any technology, but they're talking about how they're, um, you know, how do we hand this off? I say, take a full 17 seconds for a human to try to figure out what's going on because they're otherwise engaged in an emergency. So that isn't going to work, but it says, nevertheless, we're getting there gradually. And they sound like Elon Musk, you know, when Elon Musk says, you realize that you are already part cyborg, because if you go somewhere and you don't have that, you know, heavy phone in your pocket, you feel like you're missing a limb. And it's like, that's not it.

You know, it's just, I'm used to the weight in my pocket, you know, but they're saying, well, we can have these, uh, robo truckers and we're well on the way because we've got these things. We've got a smart cap as a trade name, a baseball cap that detects fatigue by monitoring a driver's brainwaves, doing a constant EEG. And there's several different makeups of things like that. Then they've got something else that is looking, a pair of glasses that is monitoring how often you blink. Excuse me, another one that's looking to see whether you're checking your mirrors or not. And they're looking at this and I'm thinking, and they even mentioned it, they say, well, this is going to kind of create a, an antipathy between drivers

and the machines that are nagging them about everything. It's like, yeah, you bet it's going to create that type of environment, but that's where these people are headed. I mean, it's just like Jeff Bezos who doesn't want to give his employees time to go to the bathroom. This is the kind of micromanagement that these people running these companies are using. They really do want robots, and robots are slaves. But in the meantime, since the mechanical robots aren't up to speed, we're going to turn you into slaves, and we're going to be monitoring you like you're a machine. It's just amazing to me.

Yeah, there's an aspect there that goes beyond the demoralization aspect of it, which is real. into slaves, and we're going to be monitoring you like you're a machine. It's just amazing to me. Yeah, there's an aspect there that goes beyond the demoralization aspect of it, which is real, but also this presumption of perfection, to put it that way, that this technology is infallible, and that it's always invariably superior to a human brain exercising human judgment and human skill. And that's nonsense. That's simply just not true. There are so many examples of technology failing because technology fundamentally relies on its programming. And if something happens that's outside of the box of the programming, the system doesn't know how to deal with it. And then if you have a human machine miner who's never been trained

or expected to exercise judgment and initiative, what's he going to do? Well, he's going to fly into the ground or drive into a wall. That's right. And this constant monitoring of these people, demanding perfection, you're talking about nanny technology, just looking at everything that they're doing, measuring their skin for conductivity and their heartbeat and all the rest of this stuff,

and then making judgments about the condition of the driver and nagging them. It's just a nightmare scenario when you look at what these people have in mind to do. Yeah, it's terrible. And I have noticed, by the way, when I do my video reviews, I do a walk around of the vehicle, and sometimes I do a behind-the-wheels segment, and something gets picked up by the camera that my eyes cannot see. I've noticed that when I take a video of the dashboard, for example, you can see these little red lights that are blinking back and forth and you can't see them yourself. The camera picks

them up. And what that is, is a system that's monitoring your eyes and your movements, which then is used to, you know, decide whether you're safe to drive and, you know, to issue some prompt or warning, you know, just like a stick being shoved at you to do what you're supposed to do according to the programming. Wow. It's kind of like you put being shoved at you to do what you're supposed to do according to the programming. Wow. It's kind of like you put on the glasses so you can see the head of the bliminal moon. They live, right. They live, yeah.

Oh, that's amazing. Well, you know, there were some good cars that you reviewed. Tell us about that. I think you had a Mazda that you looked at. Well, which one? You know, I lose track. I get so many of these things. There was one that you many recently. I think it was, um, uh, let me find it here. I went to the other article here, but, um, I think it was the, um, uh, it was the one that was a crossover here. Um, let me pull it

back up. Uh, yeah, the, the, uh, CX 30. Yeah. You know, Mazzda and you know thank god for mazda thank god for subaru thank god for toyota those companies um have not gone all in on this electric nonsense and uh toyota actually has publicly um kind of poo-pooed uh some of the hysteria about it which is wonderful because i think as long as there are alternatives to electric cars, there's hope for the future. If they all buy in, we're all in real trouble. Mazda, you know, and I'm not telling you anything you don't already know because you own one, Mazda really does a good job of embedding that miata-ness into all of its vehicles, even the ones that are ostensibly family vehicles, their little crossovers and so on.

They have driving dynamics and personality and styling also that actually makes you feel something. You know, the electric cars, they are the most anodyne. Maybe I'm just being, you know, subjective Gen X guy here. And, you know, it's a personal bias, but there is nothing to get me going emotionally about any electric vehicle I've ever driven. They all seem the same. They're just interchangeable shapes and colors, fundamentally the same thing. Whereas you get into a Mazda and some other vehicles that have character and personality, and you emotionally connect with the thing. It makes you want to drive. It makes you like the car. It's not just a device or an appliance. And is that a stick? I think it's automatic for that, right? Mazda... Yeah, I think the only Mazda vehicle that you can still get with a manual transmission is the Miata.

Yeah, yeah. Toyota is starting to bring some of those back, manual transmissions. But looking at the price here, for the base one, you're talking about $22,900. And for the fully loaded Premium Plus, you're talking about $35,000, whereas that Lightning truck you're talking about was $48,000 and then going up to $96,000-plus. What is the e-Mustang going for? What is that? Again, the e-Mustang starts close to $50,000. Ford had to increase the base price by $3,500,

and the ones with the longer-range battery, the price of those has gone up more than $8,000 from last year. Wow, that's amazing. Now, I see that you also had something to say about this nonsense study that I've talked about a few other times. Oh, here we go. Yep, I know where you're headed. Yeah, the unvaccinated drivers being more dangerous.

What a piece of tripe and propaganda that is, isn't it? Well, dangerous tripe, though. They're trying to draw an equivalence between people who questioned and were hesitant, as they put it, about taking the vaccines and who didn't want to wear a mask because they knew it was idiotic and they had looked into it as being essentially reckless people, dangerous people. And that means you're more likely to wreck your car. And so where I see this potentially headed is that the insurance mafia is going to try to jack up your premiums if you haven't provided proof of being vaccinated. Yeah.

Oh, we've already seen that talked about a year ago. Well, not even a year ago. It was a year ago that One America, that insurance company, pretty big company out of Indiana, they said we noticed in the third quarter and going into the fourth quarter. So they mentioned it first quarter this year. We noticed this massive increase of deaths and it was beyond three standard deviations from the mean. This is something we wouldn't expect to accept every 200 years.

Now they say that this has not, doesn't have anything to do with COVID, but the insurance president of One America Insurance Company, he said, well, we know that's not true. They just got it wrong. We know that they had to be dying of COVID, and we also know that nobody dies of COVID if you get vaccinated. Therefore, we need to raise the rates for the unvaccinated. They always look for any kind of justification to do that,

and they will right now, the enemy of the state is the unvaccinated, so they're more than happy to help them with that. It's amazing. Yeah, and the real danger here is something that I've been ranting about for a long, long time, which is that these ostensibly private companies have managed to get the government to be their enforcer. You're required to buy their product. You can't say no, at least if you want to drive legally. So that gives them tremendous leverage and power over us. It takes away our ability to say, you know what? No, I haven't filed a claim.

I haven't done anything at all objective to give you any reason for saying that I'm a dangerous or risky driver. So no, I'm not going to pay this adjustment. You can take your policy and go pound sand. They use that leverage against us to enforce our compliance. And the car insurance is just one aspect of that. Well, when I looked at this article, one of the things that it brought back to me is I've seen so many times that people who are supporting the Second Amendment will say, don't come after guns. Look at how many more people are killed in automobile accidents like don't use that argument yeah

they're going to use that against us and you know right now the difference is what you need to do if you want to make an analogy between guns and cars is the fact that uh everybody pretty much drives cars uh and and around them all the time and so we understand when there's an accident uh that uh you know the human is is at fault and it's the way that. And so we understand when there's an accident, uh, that, uh, you know, the human is, is at fault and it's a way that people drive and we don't have to go ban cars. You know,

even when you got somebody like a year ago, the guy deliberately most people down in a Christmas parade with an SUV, there were no calls to ban SUVs because everybody understood it was him. Right. But because, uh, and because there's so relatively few people compared to cars, a lot less the population has guns. It makes it an easier target for them.

And if they can push us out of the automobile, we will lose the car culture and it'll be easier and easier for them to ban transportation completely. That's where you want to make the connection between these things. Sure. And also to point out that all of this is about collectivizing people. You're not judged on your actions, what you have done. Instead, you're aggregated into some collective, the unvaccinated, gun owners, whatever it might be. And that's outrageous. It's, I think, probably the most fundamentally anti-American thing I could conceive of in that, you know, whatever I've done or not done, hold me responsible for it. But otherwise, leave me alone, you know, and other people should be

held accountable for what they've done and not done. I don't have an objection to insurance as such. If it's on the free market, just as I don't have an objection to electric cars as such, so long as we're free to say yes or no to these things. Well, and that's why you have so much money being spent on these elections, because if you want to have the government outlaw your competitors, even if it's something that's been around since the beginning of time, that you can get them to outlaw meat, you can get them to outlaw anything and make them buy your product, the new biopsy burger or whatever, you know, that you buy a politician.

It's a great return on investment you know and yet when you have these politicians like sbf who are hopelessly corrupt and in bed with these politicians and when he gets discovered or somebody outed him now you got elizabeth warren the rest of these people saying well you know we got to shut down all crypto and it's like how did you get to this it is the deputized state i call it instead of the deep? It is the deputized state. I call it instead of the deep state. It's the deputized state where they use these corporations to censor people. And it's a symbiotic relationship. They can also then do favors for the businesses by banning their competition and banning other things.

I mean, there's the two of them. It is a fascist system, a merger of corporations and government. And it is a, a dystopian, uh, you know,

future that we have. If we don't break that pattern. Yeah, I think the more worrisome thing is so many people seem to have bought into that dynamic. There's a single incident, something happens that's regrettable, and they fall immediately into line saying that that whole category of activity and everybody who's associated with it, even if no harm has been caused by it, they must be presumed to have done something, you know, whether it's the gun, whether it's the car, whatever it happens to be.

And that's a fundamental building block for a really frightening authoritarian kind of a society. Oh, yeah. Yeah, absolutely is. Well, Eric, it's great talking to you. I'm glad we finally got a hold of you. Well, I'm glad the power's back on. I might be able to go for a drive

today that's what i was gonna say you still having problems how long did it take you to get your power back uh well it was out for about 24 hours now luckily i had a generator running on gas and i suppose i could have hooked that up to the ev but then i wouldn't have been very green that's right well you know that's what elon musk did when he took his plaid tesla to the nurburgring right he took this big generator with him the Nürburgring, right? He took this big generator with him, and the people were saying, that gets the noise and the pollution. It's a dirty generator that he's doing to charge this thing, so he needed that.

I guess he needed more of a charge than he could get around there. I don't know why he took that. The good thing about the Ford Lightning is, you know, it's got that bed, so it actually can carry a generator out there. There you go. You could turn it into a Volt, a $100,000 Volt. You put a diesel generator in the back, go you could turn it into a volt a hundred thousand dollar volt you put a diesel generator in the back and you're set to go somebody did that with a tesla they it kind of looked like it made me think of mr fusion in the back of a warrant they

they had scooped out the back and they had lined it with metal you know to as a heat shield and put a gasoline generator back there so the guy had had a thousand-mile range with his Tesla because he had a generator. Yeah, that makes it practical. And, you know, it's funny, but at the same time, I'm convinced at this point that as news begins to percolate out about the real-world nature of these things, more and more people are going to be turned off. I read somewhere, and you may have also read this, that in California, an overwhelming number of early adopters who bought electric cars, and mostly Teslas in California, have turned them in for a gas engine car.

Well, good luck in California, because gasoline is so outrageously expensive. They're compared even in number two Oregon, because they have not only confiscatory taxes, but they've got special blends of gasoline. It's like Starbucks or something. But at least you can get going. Yeah, I know. I agree. How do you put a value on your time, which is irrecoverable? Oh, absolutely.

Absolutely. Well, it's great talking to you. Eric Peters, epautos.com, folks. A great site for information about liberty and mobility. And you can't really have one without the other. Can you? Thank you, Eric.

Have a Merry Christmas. I appreciate it. Thank you. Merry Christmas. Happy new year. The common man. They created common core and dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us.

Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.