The David Knight Show - 2Nov22 FBI Wants 66 Yrs to Redact Seth Rich Laptop They Said They Didn't Have

Episode Date: November 2, 2022

Outline of today's show with timecodesThe never-ending saga of the Seth Rich laptop: FBI asks US court for 66 yrs to redact and hide information they've insisted they DO NOT have.3:22Mainstream media says "shocking new details blow up conspiracy theories about Paul Pelosi attack". True? Not even close.14:09Paul Pelosi’s underwear story.20:50Why did Pelosi wait until police arrived to attack home invader? So many questions still remain.24:41As they do with 2nd Amendment, Democrats want to misuse this incident, whatever happened, to attack 1st Amendment and justify political censorship41:28The Prisoner’s campaign for #2. Who is #1?49:59McConnell removes support for tied Senate race.1:01:35YouTube puts disclaimer on pro-life videos that falsely claim "lack of context"1:14:36Former Planned Parenthood manager describes what happens after an abortion — "it’s not a clump of cells".1:17:27"The Procedure", narrated by Kevin Sorbo, an animated recreation narrated from the perspective of the sonographer who witnesses the procedure, the film is a heartbreaking reminder that abortion is the murder of an innocent child. WARNING: Graphic, Disturbing. The 4-minute animated clip shows a surgical abortion procedure in detail, underscoring the humanity of the child and vividly displaying the reality of her pain.  1:23:08The saddest part is that this procedure is still happening today.1:28:31Pro-life woman says she was featured in a pro-abortion ad featured by Hillary and Gavin Newsom. She was crying tears of joy at the overturn of Roe, but that's NOT how the commercial characterizes it.1:31:56How the Blue Check has become a badge of honor among social media savvy leftists — who are enraged they would be charged a nominal amount.1:40:44Elon Musk is dangerous because he’s been doing what the government wants.1:47:58The galactic empire has proposed amnesty for anyone who might have gotten a little carried away and blown up several planets.1:51:08David’s thoughts on the war profiteering of the military-industrial complex and BigPharma, while Biden carps only about oil prices1:57:53Rabbi Smith joins the show to talk about the fear campaign around the gain of function research.2:01:45What’s the purpose of the "lab-created virus" narrative and the fear campaigns?2:13:26What’s driving the change in the world.2:34:33How did the indoctrination in schools become so effective?2:38:23How many people speak about undoing the first wave of Marxism, which was a new deal?2:45:17Mainstream Propaganda.2:49:28Poll question: How do we determine moral right & wrong? Given a choice of (1) Bible, (2) follow your heart, (3) follow the crowd, the majority. Here's how America answered2:53:03Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 2nd of November, year of our Lord 2022, day 965 of the emergency. Today, we're going to take a look at the updated, as the mainstream media, Associated Press, Reuters, Drudge Report are telling us that they have debunked the Pelosi conspiracy theories. We're going to begin by taking a look at the fact that the FBI wants to hide the Seth Rich laptop data for 66 years. Does that sound familiar? Yeah, just trust them. We're also

going to take a look at elections for prisoners. Yeah, that's you and me. And the issues that the Democrats think they're going to win on, killing kids and mutilating them if they survive. And the Republicans are afraid to defend that. We'll also take a look at the blue check on Twitter and content management. Where is that going to go? And, of course, pharmaceutical information. We're going to have Rabbi David Smith joining us to talk about what he sees as the next focus in this move. Stay with us. We'll be right back. Well, that's right. You heard me. I said 66 years before they released the Seth Rich laptop information.

Wait a minute. I thought they didn't have it. They had, they didn't have it. Then they did have it. Uh, then, uh, you know, they, they, now they're saying, uh, that they've got to have it for 66 years, you know, because they've got to hide things for 66 years. It takes a long time to hide this stuff. Uh, 500 pages a month, which is exactly, does that sound familiar? It's exactly what the FDA was doing. We can produce 500 pages a month because we've got a lot of stuff in there we've got to hide.

It takes a long time to redact that kind of stuff. So the FDA wanted 75 years before they would release what they and Pfizer were conspiring to do. And so the question is, what are they doing? What is the FBI doing? And this is all coming out at the same time that mainstream media said yesterday, while the conspiracy theories about Paul Pelosi have been debunked, because we now have an FBI criminal complaint here. And so, you know, this is what they say. So it's done.

It's done. So let's take a look first at what they want with this story. The never-ending saga of the Seth Rich laptop. The FBI is asking a U.S. court to reverse its order, that it produce information from Rich's laptop. And the FBI says if the court does not reverse that order, the Bureau wants 66 years to produce the information. Rich, of course, if you remember, was a Democrat National Committee staffer who was killed on the street in Washington in mid-2016.

Nobody has ever been arrested in connection to the murder. Coincidentally, there was information about Hillary Clinton. And this is still very key, and it's key to the Julian Assange story. Because I want to say that Julian Assange stole information. He says, no, I was given to it by sources. I was given the information by sources. In other words, is this a case that they want to come after Julian Assange for espionage? Julian Assange says that this is the same thing that happened with the Pentagon Papers. And, of course, it has been celebrated after the fact, the victory by the Washington Post and the New York Times over the government,

talking about opinion papers that were there about what was being done with the Vietnam War. That was stolen by Daniel Ellsberg. It was given to the press. And the Supreme Court ruled that they could not come after the New York Times and the Washington Post. And so they have been celebrated in story, in books, even in movies.

The Post, I think, was the name of it. Had a lot of big-name stars, Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, I think, was in it. How they hung tough against the government to support the First Amendment. Same people that are calling for Julian Assange's head now. But anyway, he implied strongly, he didn't say it, but there was strong implication, that information about Hillary Clinton and stuff was given by Seth Rich. This is why this is an issue. And that he died.

It's funny how people in and around the Clintons especially die like that. But anyway, a U.S. District Judge, an Obama appointee, ruled in September that the Bureau must hand over the information from the computer to Brian Huddleston, a Texas man who filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the information. of Rich's family members outweighed public interest was rejected by the judge, who noted that the FBI cited no relevant case law to support this argument. This is, again, when I said, just as I was talking yesterday to the libertarian candidate in Indiana who was running for Secretary of State because it was important to have transparency. We don't want to have another situation like January the 6th. We don't want to have another situation like January the 6th. We don't want to have a situation like what is developing in Brazil. We want to have transparency and openness so people can trust elections.

And we want to have transparency and openness when we talk about scientific information that are influencing laws and public policy. And so over a decade ago, probably about 15 years ago, I guess, I was involved with an organization that was trying to get the information about climate change that was being used by people like Michael Mann, a co-conspirator in ClimateGate. And they were sending emails to each other saying, we have to hide the decline.

Our models are not working. We said, well, we'd like to see your data. No, no, no. You can't see it because of privacy. I've got privacy. And a court actually upheld that. Even though it had been published, even though he did it all on university time, public university time.

And it was used to craft policy. We couldn't look at the data. Does that sound familiar? Just like we see with what's going on with Fauci, the FDA, Pfizer, all of this stuff. Hide it, hide it, hide it. Everything is hidden from you. And if they even produce it, as you saw from the European Member of Parliament, he said, we want to know what you did in terms of buying these vaccines. Can we see the contracts on this? And they released them and he held up page after page after page, everything redacted. He said, look at this, this is

ridiculous. Well, they kept investigating. They found close relationships between the politicians who were making the purchasing decisions and their spouses and Pfizer. In other words, corruption. Corruption was there. And they wanted to hide that from everybody. And they did. They effectively redacted all of that information. So now the FBI lawyers are saying

that this ruling was erroneous and the Bureau should not have to produce any information at all, even under the Freedom of Information Act. They say they have exemptions. And this is the basis on which they say they have an exemption they say the information is to be exempted because it would disclose the identity of a confidential source now this is something they didn't say before uh do you believe this are they reaching yeah it would expose a confidential source well i need to see some proof of that we can't we can't show you the proof because it's all confidential you got to take my word for it and this is the fbi the people who really should be reordering the three alphabet uh letters to fib because that's

what they do they fib on a regular basis It's one lie after the other about everything. And they're constantly instigating, you know, the Federal Bureau of Instigation. They're constantly instigating terrorist attacks so they can expose them. You know, it's like a fireman, pyromaniac going around setting fires so he can be a hero putting them out. That's what the FBI does. That's their M.O. Where's the constitutional authority for that, by the way? Why is it that we didn't have an FBI until we got corrupt Jagger Hoover? Until we got the Palmer raids of World War I?

How did we manage as a society for 150 years or so without an FBI. And where is the authority for them to even exist in the Constitution? The FBI, after claiming that it never possessed Rich's laptop, never had any information from it, acknowledged last year. After four years, they changed their story. For four years, they said they never had it and they don't have any information from it and then after four years i said well okay we've got it and we got so much of it that we're going to need 66 years to redact it at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you

that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate

the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gambling care.e that's why i call them the fib

the fib information and material extracted from the computer was provided by a source to an fbi agent during the meeting on march 15th 2018 fbi records officer michael uh Seidel said in a declaration that he filed, he filed a declaration. He said the files included photographs, documents, and a lot of other material. But now in a new filing, government lawyers say the FBI never extracted the data. They said the information is on a compact disc containing images on the laptop. The FBI, they said, did not open an investigation into the murder of Seth Rich, nor did it provide investigative or technical assistance to any investigation into the murder of Seth Rich.

As a result, the FBI has never extracted the data from the compact disc, never processed the information contained on the disk, they said, in contradiction of the declaration made by their agent. It's a big crime to lie to the FBI, but the FBI does nothing but lie to us all the time, right? The FBI would have to convert information on the disk, they said, into pages. That's how it works. And then review the pages to redact information for FOIA, according to the government.

And so they say, we can only do 500 pages a month. You know, I go through about 500 pages every two to three days when I used to print. It's one of the reasons why I've gone paperless on this thing. We're getting worried about supplies and cost. The toner was going through the roof. And, you know, we had a couple of times where it was like, Oh, they're out of stock here. They're out of stock there. It's like, well, we, so anyway, but, uh, yeah, I used to, I would typically go through about 500 pages every two or three days. Um, I wasn't redacting it. I was highlighting it,

but I was reading it. Maybe they should hire me. Hire me to do your redactions. I volunteer. I'll I'll do it. I'll do it for free. If you give me the book rights. Okay. So here's a summary of what the FBI has done.

First, they say we don't have it. Then they say, well, we do have it and we have the extracted data. Then they say we did not extract the data now, but they say all along, you can't see it. And even if we're compelled to show it, we need 66 years because we've got so much to hide and redact the FBI. So now the associated press Reuters, all the establishment media, and screeching headlines from Dredge Report that we're saying on Monday. Because I talked about this extensively on Saturday,

talked a bit more about it on Monday. And then there is a bunch of stuff. Oh, we've got an FBI agent who has filed charges again. So not just the local charges, but now the FBI has gotten in and filed charges again. So not just the local charges, but now the FBI has gotten in and filed charges. And there was a statement from the agent and that type of thing. So that was released. And the summary says,

associated press after looking at all this stuff, well, that's it. The FBI half spoken. And that's the final word on it. Because, you know, the FBI accuses somebody doing something. They did it. If the FBI indicts somebody,

if they file a complaint, if they make a statement, well, that's it. I mean, we don't need to think about it anymore, right? You know, if you indict somebody, you can indict a ham sandwich, right? Why? Because it's a one-sided thing. There's nobody pushing back on the other side. They don't want anybody questioning anything that they say anywhere. And, um, so, you know, an indictment is just the beginning of a process. A complaint is just the beginning of a process. It doesn't make it true.

And the question is, does the FBI have any integrity? Uh, does it have any credibility in any of this stuff? So more details have come out, and the headline from the Associated Press is, was, shocking new details blow up conspiracy theories about Paul Pelosi attack. This came out Monday afternoon after the show. And so they filed federal kidnapping and assault charges.

And of course, locally, the district attorney there, Jenkins, has filed charges of attempted murder, residential burglary, assault with a deadly weapon, elder abuse, false imprisonment of an elder, threats to public officials and their families, and he faces anywhere from 13 years to life in prison if convicted of just the local charges against him. The federal complaint that has come out has, in the words of Associated Press, has debunked conspiracy theories

that are spread on the internet, fueling rhetoric, right-wing circles, casting doubt on some of the facts of the attack. So, according to what happened in the complaint, De Pompe told officers in a recorded interview last week that he broke through a glass door in the home using a hammer, this hammer. According to the criminal complaint, he said Paul Pelosi was in bed at the time and appeared

surprised. DePape allegedly told Pelosi to wake up that he was looking for Nancy, to which Paul Pelosi responded that she wasn't there. Paul Pelosi apparently asked DePape how they could resolve the situation. Now, is um a little bit different from what we've heard uh we'd heard that there was one police officer who said he was looking for nancy now this is no police officers heard that that's what paul pelosi says uh when pelosi responded that his wife wasn't home and wouldn't be for several days to pop a said he'll wait yeah this body worn camera footage from the police showed a broken laminated glass door near the door handle near the back of the porch on the home and and I showed that

picture on Saturday there's a an aerial shot maybe I showed it again on Monday I don't remember but it was kind of strange when you look at it. One of the things that I thought was strange was a tremendous amount of glass that had broken away from the house, which looked like it was broken from the inside to me. I couldn't see, but the video was not good enough quality to tell if there was any glass on the inside. But I thought it was strange that there was so much glass so far away from the house as if it were knocked, you know, from the inside out. But nevertheless, what we really need to see,

isn't it, is video of it. Rather than seeing an, you know, this is debunked by an FBI complaint, absolutely not. It'll be debunked when you show me the videotape. Because we know that they got video all over the place. At this home, at other homes. This is a $6 million home in a very expensive San Francisco area. And as a matter of fact, one of their witnesses is a security guard at an adjoining house. He says, yeah, I saw this guy coming up there, you know, saying it was, and he had a backpack on his back. And he was, you know, dressed, I think, in black or something.

We'll get to it here. But show me the video. I'm sure you got video at your house. They hired a security guard. You don't think they got security cameras? There's nothing in this complaint about an alarm going off with a door being broken. Why is that? And of course, the big, big elephant in the room is, where is all of this security that Nancy Pelosi has?

Second in line to the presidency. She has the Capitol Police that guard her. They just spent another $2 billion, but they already had a lot of security around Nancy Pelosi. What are we getting for all that money to protect our elected officials? And of course, they have had the security. The question is, does she not have any security? No, she does have security. And other people pointed that out. We went to the house to serve papers, and there was security all over the place, even though neither of them were home, because that's the way you do security.

You don't have this limited amount of security. They got multiple homes, and they got security around all of those homes. They're in this rich neighborhood in San Francisco, and they're in the rich area of Napa Valley. They're in the rich area of Georgetown University, and all of these homes have their own security detail because you can't leave a home unguarded. People could put a remote control bomb in there, right?

So where's the security? None of that is talked about here. So if you want to debunk it, Associated Press, Drudge, all the rest of the Democrats, all you people, show us the videotape. Give us an explanation of why there was no talk from anybody about an alarm. All of this stuff about the 911 call and everything, you don't have any alarm stuff there?

You don't have any video that you can show us of what happened? You don't have security there? Come on. This is why their story stinks. Besides their reputations, besides how the Democrats always use this stuff. So what evolves here in their narrative is a guy who is absolutely crazy. But the bottom line that you need to understand is that it's the Republicans that need to be stopped. And even more importantly, what needs to be stopped is our speech.

Our speech is dangerous. You see, whenever anything happens, whether it is real or manufactured or whatever, the Democrats will seize a shooting. They'll seize an attack against a politician, unless it's a Republican politician, right? They didn't really care about what happened with the congressman who was shot up at the baseball game. They didn't care about that.

It wasn't any big deal, right? But they will seize on it to shut down the Second Amendment. Oh, we need to ban this. We need to ban that. And they're doing the same thing. It's the same playbook, the same MO. We've got to take your free speech rights, just like we've got to take your Second Amendment rights,

your right to protect yourself. Because some lunatic somewhere did something. And so you need to shut up. Because when you criticize the government, people get angry at what we're doing. And they might try to hurt us. So you need to shut up at what we're doing. And they might try to hurt us. So you need to shut up about what we're doing. You understand?

Or we'll come and break your legs with a hammer and with SWAT teams. So anyway, the narrative is that they sit there in the bedroom. He wakes him up, and they make the case that the underwear story is because Pelosi is in bed. He's in his underwear. So evidently, that was where that came from. That part of it is also suspicious because it was reported by Fox News, the local Fox News channel. Where did they get that information?

And then they read, it was the headline. It was the headline. It was the lead in the story. And then they changed all that later. And what's even more surprising is I played for you the clip where a guy was at the San Francisco Police Department, their press release, and some guy, one person, recorded another guy talking to his editor.

Oh, we know who this guy is? He's the nudist guy? Well, we can't say any of that, right? Oh, okay, I won't say anything about that. So we know that there were orders going out, what you could and could not say. Don't talk about anything sexual. Why is that? Now, why would you redact the part that this guy is a nudist? Why would you redact the underwear statements and all the rest of this stuff?

That is also suspicious and remains suspicious. So this is the way they relate the call. There's a lot of questions about, they said somebody opened the door from the inside. And yet you had other things saying when the door was opened, they saw the two of them grasping the hammer. Well, the way they explained this in the complaint was they said they're there at the bedroom and Pelosi tried to access a phone that was located in the household's elevator.

But DePape blocked access to it. Pelosi was eventually able to get to the bathroom and use another phone to dial 911. And again, you know, it was, like I said, this is an important safety thing. Whenever you're attacked by a lunatic breaks into your home, always remember that you say to them to stop anything. You say, can we put this on pause until i go to the bathroom they'll fall for it every time guaranteed anyway tabape confirmed in his account to the police that paul pelosi went into the bathroom while they were talking and that he called 9-1-0 on 9-1-1 on his

phone says the papi he said he felt like pelosi's actions compelled him to respond and that there was, quote, no way the police were going to forget that call. The poppy said he stayed after the 911 call because, quote, like the American founding fathers with the British, he was fighting against tyranny without the option of surrender. Well, I would like to hear that tape where he actually says that. Are they putting words in his mouth? I don't know. But see how they're going to make all of this political.

Anyway, Paul Pelosi, after the police arrived, they say Paul Pelosi opened the door. DePape also said that Paul Pelosi grabbed the hammer in DePape's hand, in which DePape responded that he wasn't going to surrender and that he would go through Paul Pelosi. Once the door was open, an officer saw Paul Pelosi and DePape both holding a hammer. DePape's other hand was holding Pelosi's forearm. Now, if the police are there and Pelosi opens the door, he's 82. This other guy is like over six feet tall.

So why would, if the police are there and Pelosi's open the door, why would Pelosi then attack the guy with the big guy with a hammer? Why would he let the police handle it now? And if he thought that he could take this guy on, why did he get all the trouble to call the police in the first place? Why didn't he just take him on to start with? Many questions still remain. So this is the bottom line. From the Associated Press, from Dr. All the people say, well, all these conspiracy theories and questions have now been debunked. And here is our summary. Here is the official narrative. It's very sad, said

the district attorney there, to see that we're once again at a point in history where people believe that it's okay to express their political sentiments through violence. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival,

we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie It demonstrates that we have to calm things down. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. It demonstrates that we have to calm things down. Shut your mouth if you're criticizing government. Don't you dare. Let me just say this.

You know, we had a rash. When I was a kid, we had a rash of suicides. Big suicides. JFK was shot. Martin Luther King was shot. RFK was shot. Martin Luther King was shot. RFK was shot. Um, and, uh, only one of those was even with a handgun allegedly. And I've talked to people who questioned what was going on. Uh,

RFK jr. Questions that assassination as a matter of fact, uh, above his father, but that was the only one that was done with a handgun. The other two were done with rifles. And so they banned handguns, right? They banned handguns. But they didn't try to ban speech. Don't you think they could have said, well, you know, there's this, we've got these lone shooters out there. And, you know, it was political criticism of JFK that led to his assassination.

It had nothing to do with the CIA, the mafia. It had nothing to do with any of that stuff. It had nothing to do with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, none of that stuff. It was all about the political criticism of him. And there was a lot of political criticism of Martin Luther King. And so, you know, we should just eliminate the First Amendment, right? Why didn't they do that? Why didn't they do that? Why didn't they do that?

You know, if we go back and we look, Reason Magazine put this together a couple of years ago because everybody was saying, we just got to turn down the rhetoric and we're going to need to start censoring your speech on social media and other places because it's just too dangerous. Thank you, Igor. I appreciate that very much. Thank you for the tip on Rockford. It's just too dangerous and we've got to turn this all down.

So Reason put this out and said they went back, and they got things that were written about political candidates around the beginning of the republic, around 1800, these various elections, and they put them into political ads. Some political watchers are saying this could be the nastiest, most negative election season of all time. They say that every time. It's taken dirty to a whole new level. When pundits start shouting and politicians start calling each other's names,

it can seem like a return to civility is not possible. Like the very idea is a relic of some bygone era. John Adams is a blind, bald, crippled, toothless man who wants to start a war with France. While he's not busy importing mistresses from Europe, he's trying to marry one of his sons to a daughter of King George. Haven't we had enough monarchy in America? I'm Thomas Jefferson, and I approve this message because John Adams is a hideous, hermaphroditical character with neither the force and firmness of a man nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.

If Thomas Jefferson wins, murder, robbery, rape, adultery, and incest will be openly taught and practiced. The air will be rent with the cries of the distressed. The soil will be soaked with blood and the nation black with crimes. Are you prepared to see your dwellings in flames? Female chastity violated? Children writhing on a pike. I'm John Adams, and I approve this message because Jefferson is the son of a half-breed Indian squaw raised on hoecakes, and Hamilton is a Creole bastard brat of a Scotch peddler.

The nastiest, most negative elections... ...canadates have taken dirty to a whole new level. It can seem like a return to civility is not possible. Yeah, again, they end that with a quote against Lincoln, you know, hatchet-faced nutmeg addict. The one about hermaphroditic character, boy, that's literally true today. Coming out of our ears. Thank you, Charles Smith. I appreciate the tip.

Thank you very much on Rockfin. Yeah, you know, but we had free speech then. And they said some pretty crazy things. I think most of the people figured out that, you know, they had overreached. And they could put two and two together. We don't need to have the First Amendment taken away. And they never did that, but that's the purpose of all of this. That's how the Democrats are going to use this.

As I said before, this guy DePape is really more of a product of San Francisco. Drugs, depravity, and Democrat policies, that's what he's a product of. He's a product of the idea that you leave crazy homeless people on the street, and you don't put them away in institutions. And that turns into situations where you have people actually killed. I have a story about a father and daughter who were actually killed by a homeless person anything happening there so again it's he is a product of drugs depravity and democrats is really he's a 3d okay one of the things that i thought was funny in this ap article in terms of saying well this has all been debunked some conspiracy theories alleging paul pelosi and

de pape knew each other alleged the attacker had been found in his underwear when the police arrived claimed that he was made and has that's now been retracted i talked about that before uh police interviewed the witness who was a private security guard again the witness that we need to see are the cameras that were everywhere. So, you know, and why was there no security? They come after Marjorie Taylor Greene because she put out a tweet. It was Paul Pelosi's friend. And they say, well, he told the dispatcher during 9-1-1 call that he didn't know the identity of the man who broke into his home. But the man said that his name was David.

Except that he actually did say he's David, he's a friend. Now, he might have been saying that, you know, if we heard the recording of that, which they probably won't release, you could hear from his inflection whether, you know, he was saying he's a friend, or if he's trying to mollify the guy that he's afraid of, who then he later attacked when the police got there. Anyway, the AP noticed that they intentionally leave out the fact that he said his name is David. He's a friend.

They just said his name is David because they wanted to attack Marjorie Taylor Greene for saying that he was a friend. So the bottom line is the guy is crazy, right? And just like guns, we have to now take your speech. And this is a government that lies, that hides, that lacks any transparency anywhere whatsoever. But don't you dare question their motive, because then they will attack you, right? But again, as I said,

it's a product of Democrat policies. If we look at the story of the, let me get that, the story of what another homeless person did. California dad and 22-year-old daughter stabbed to death by a homeless man. This is Democrat policies that are doing this. Forget about all this stuff about political speech

and all the rest of the stuff. You got people who are out there like this, David DePoppe. A lot of people on the streets, as I said before, and many of these jurisdictions, the vast majority of the violent crime is in and around these homeless encampments, but they don't want to do anything about that. So if this had no sexual dimension to it, if it was a crazy guy who broke in. They want to turn this into a vehicle for censoring political speech,

when in reality, it's a demonstration of what their policies are. They're policies that they have no interest in policing crime. So California dad is dead and his 22 year old daughter they were working on a car outside of a Kohl's I don't know why they would go to Kohl's to work on it maybe it broke down and this guy comes up and stabs him the father was rushed to the hospital where he died

while his daughter was pronounced dead at the scene are they going to do an article saying, this guy, what was he thinking? What was this homeless guy thinking? What were his politics? Did he follow Trump? Was he a MAGA guy? And do we need to have knife control? Do we need to have speech control?

Was it something these people said? Are they, I don't know, they cisgender? Are they Christian or something like that that would justify him doing that kind of violence to them? Do we need gun control? Yeah, it's the homeless problem. It's the drugs, the rest of this stuff. They tolerate all of those, and they don't seem to have a problem with any of it. So, you know, still, they say this is all politically motivated.

I'll just give you the bottom line. In my opinion, there's 60% chance this guy's just a schizo degenerate who attacked them. I'd say there's a 40% chance it was a gay prostitution event gone wrong. So this is what I say to the Associated Press, to Drudge, to the FBI, to the local prosecutors. Convince me. Show me the video that you have.

Tell me why there was no security there. Okay? Play the tapes, whatever. You got all the evidence. But, of course, that's right. You don't like to hide evidence just like with seth rich at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back

as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with Live Score Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. But regardless of what happened there, the Democrats are going to use it for their political agenda. They're going to use it to destroy our freedoms, as they always do. That's how it is going to roll out. And so then we have people who have jumped into this, like Al Mohler. If you remember, Al Mohler was pushing the jab when this was coming out.

He was telling everybody it was a miracle from God. It was like a moonshot. And you needed to do it. Al Mohler is, he's at the, he's a seminary president, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. And he is very big in Southern Baptist circles. He just ran for the Southern Baptist Convention, just ran for president a year or two ago. So he's very well known. He's got a blog.

And again, he was pushing the vaccine, telling people, because he's a seminary professor, that it is necessary to do this to love your neighbor. I said, well, the way I love my neighbor is I warn them if a big semi is coming down, they're about to step off the curb, I warn them about that, and I see that this is an even bigger semi. It's going to take down untold numbers of people, and that's how I love my neighbor. I warn them about people who intend to harm and kill them for money. I think that's love. So anyway, when it comes to political issues,

which is what his blog is about, he does like a 25-minute blog talking about news and things like that from a Christian perspective. But what he was missing in the pharmaceutical thing, he was missing all the history of how the pharmaceutical companies had lied, how corrupt they were, how many times Pfizer has been found guilty of corruption, fined billions of dollars, one of the most heavily fined companies anywhere. Al Mohler didn't really have a clue about government's hunger for power. He didn't really care about the abortion connection. He didn't really care about the

fact that the vaccine was going to be used to push the mark of the beast over to the window. He didn't have a clue even about theological issues, let alone about political issues. And so he's back. And this is what he has to say. He says, both sides bear responsibility for weaponizing language. You know, we've got to shut this down. Again, just like the Democrats. This is a guy who's supposed to be a conservative Baptist.

And yet he sounds just like all these people who are saying, you know, we've never had rhetoric like this before. We've just got to shut this down. So I played that clip from Reason TV. And so now he says, I want to speak to those on the right, to conservatives. We bear responsibility. Do we? Do we?

Am I responsible for this? Am I responsible? I'm somebody who has a political show. I talk all the time. Am I responsible for what David DePompe did? No. Not even if he listened to me. I'm not responsible for it.

I didn't tell him to do this. I pointed out the flaws of these people. I have a right and a duty to do that. And the problem is, Al Mohler, because you sucked up to authority, because you naively shilled for them. Let's hope that it was naive. Let's hope that you didn't know. Because you did that, a lot of people died and are still going to die and have had their lives destroyed

because you didn't want to criticize the government narrative. You didn't want to push back against this stuff. And now you're telling us we better not push back against it because it could cause violence. So he says, we bear responsibility for weaponizing language in a way that can mislead by the very use of violent imagery. It can mislead someone who is deluded or troubled into thinking that the answer to a political problem is some form of violent act. Well, let me just say this. How about instead of a situation where we just turn the insane asylums open and we let the people live on the street, and then we walk around in eggshells because,

shh, don't want to say anything. These guys are absolutely crazy. They'll pick up a knife and kill you if you even look at them sideways. And maybe they'll kill you even if you don't look at them. But let's not criticize a policy. And let's not say anything that could antagonize these people or weaponize them to go attack somebody else. Shh, don't say anything about the policy.

Don't say anything to the people. Now, see, the left doesn't really care about their language, do they? Well, actually, they do. They have very hateful language. They're always calling people racist. They're always inventing new terms like cisgender to make normal heterosexual relationship seem strange. They're always seizing the high ground.

They're always redefining our language in order to do that. They use language very effectively and we're not supposed to notice. We're supposed to bow to that. And you got Al Mohler and telling you, Hey, you know, you need to tone this down. You need to not criticize these people. Come on. Um, he says, um, we need to advocate for our own political party and candidates without personalizing this to the point that we demonize our political opponents

to the point that at least some hearing us would think that what we're saying is that we would be well off without them on the political scene. Well, let me just say this. I think there's far too much ad hominem attacks. I think a lot of that is done, like my former boss. You know, oh, look at that guy. Look at his face. Doesn't he look like this or that?

You know, and look at those eyes. Can you see the demons in his eyes and all the rest of this stuff? That's not productive. That doesn't help at all. It makes for entertaining shows that make a lot of money, but it doesn't do anything. We want to have a discussion of politics, and so that means that we want to discuss policies and the politics.

And sometimes when we talk about the policies, it oftentimes reflects on their character, whether or not they're telling the truth, whether or not they have reversed themselves, whether or not they're saying one thing to one group of people and something else to another group of people. So often that leads, when we talk about their policies and we look at what they do and their actions, many times that leads us to talking about their character. And character is something that we should talk about. And if it is bad character, we need to point it out to people

instead of being silent about it. So he says on the left and on the right, there are people who say things that are over the line. Over the line? What line? Is there a line? Who gets to draw the line. Over the line? What line? Is there a line? Who gets to draw the line, Al? Who gets to draw the line saying this is over the line, this is misinformation, disinformation,

mal-information. People could get hurt with this information. Who gets to draw those lines, Al? Is it government, Dad? You? Who draws that line? Look, there is a line here, as far as I can tell. He's not making any

case from a Christian doctrinal standpoint. This is a somebody who I didn't have the time to listen to the full 25 minutes, so I'm going with this person's characterization of it. But there's nothing in here from the person who uh wrote

the article michael faust um there's a couple of pages article and there's nothing in here where he references al moeller making a theological argument nothing where he quotes the bible see if al moeller is a christianologian, he should be speaking to Christians and talking to them and say, as Christians, this is the way that we should conduct ourselves. But, and understand, you know, that other people are not going to be defined by Christian morality and other people aren't going to care what Al Mohler says. So he's talking to Christians. So make the case about what is proper speech. But when Al Moore gets in the political realm, I think the most charitable thing I could say about him is that he's clueless. That's the most charitable thing I could say about him.

Over the line? Seriously? Yeah, see, the problem is, and this is what happens with politics and why people get angry about it. Because politics, to a lot of people, is about controlling other people. That's typically what it is. We had an exception at the beginning of this country. We had people who set up a system to try to prevent the government from controlling other people. That's why we have a Bill of Rights. That's why we had a Declaration of Independence and other things like that. They worked to try to stop that control of other people.

But the reality is that's not the way our government is anymore. Our American government has reverted to the same kind of power play and corruption that you see in every other government throughout history. And so these people want to control other people. They're corrupt. They're creating conspiracies. They're hiding things from people. And you know, when you do that kind of thing, people are going to hate you.

And so what Al Mohler doesn't do is he doesn't, from a Christian perspective, call on these politicians to be honorable. He doesn't call on them to abide by the law. He doesn't call on them to support liberty. Because if he were to do that type of thing, then a lot of the anger and criticism of these people would be abated. But he should be calling on them to do that. He doesn't say anything here about praying for our leaders,

but you know, that's... At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.

They certainly do need it. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Where am I? In the village. What do you want?

Information. Whose side are you on? That would be telling. We want information. Information. Information. You won't get it. By hook or by crook, we will.

Who are you? The new number two. Who is number one? You are number six. I am not a number number I am a free man what a piece of luck to start our election campaign today showery outlook is very depressing don't you think

elections in this place of course we make our choice every twelve months every citizen has a choice. Are you going to run? Like blazes, the first chance I get. I meant run for office. Whose?

Mine, for instance. You have a delicate sense of humor. Naturally. Humor is the very essence of a democratic society. It looks like a unanimous majority. They're glad after worrying me. Very bad for morale. Some of these good people don't seem to appreciate the value of free elections. They think it's a game. Everyone votes for a dictator.

Not at all. Just that their resistance is low. Frankly, my dear fellow, you are just the sort of candidate we need. What happens if I run against you? I might as well while I'm waiting. Delightful. What physically happens if I win? You're the boss.

Number one's the boss. Confession by coercion, is that what you want? Vote for him and you have it. Or stand firm upon this electoral platform and speak a word without fear. The word is freedom. They say six of one and half a dozen of the other. Not here. It's six for two and two for nothing.

And six for three for all. For three for all for free for all vote vote well and there you have it the prisoner patrick mcgillen's excellent series of course he had done secret agent man uh that series was his and uh posited the idea that a nameless prisoner a nameless agent resigns angrily and then he is kidnapped and taken to a village and they want to know what he knows they want to know why he resigned and that type of thing and so it is a cat and mouse thing uh that is the episode where they get him to run for the number two position number one is hidden from you a great analogy to where we are isn't it uh i loved some of those lines in there why Why don't you run?

Do you intend on running? Yes, like blazes is the first chance I get to get out of this place. And so, as you can see there, I've got the vote for number six. That's my candidate in this election. He decided that, well, while I'm sitting here waiting to run like blazes, I might as well run for office. I did that. Tony Arterburn did that.

Why not give it a chance? But as he said, everybody votes for a dictator. It's got a double meaning, doesn't it? At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plus by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. If it's a dictator, he's going to make sure that he gets everybody's vote. That's who counts the votes that counts. But that's kind of what we got right now. Because we don't have anybody who wants a rule of law. Anybody who wants a constitution.

They want executive orders. Everybody votes for a dictator. And everybody seems to be happy with that right now. Guard Goldsmith loves a prisoner. He and I have talked about that on air, off air, about that. And Guard, by the way, will be doing the show on Saturday, the Rockfin show. Very excited to have him doing it and allowing us to go to a wedding of very, very close friends of ours. Their son, their adopted son is getting married in North Carolina.

So we're going to be going to that wedding on Saturday. It's at the same time as the show. So I appreciate guard standing in and doing doing that always does an excellent job. And, uh, as a matter of fact, our friend has got, uh, another son who, uh, got married in another state and they're going to have a formal wedding later on, but, uh, they got married. And, um, so we'll be seeing them as well. So it's kind of two, uh, two weddings and so many people getting married here in this one month. It's unbelievable. But anyway, I appreciate Gard doing that.

And when we look at the elections, you know, what is happening in Brazil really underscores. Yesterday, I talked to Jeff Moore, who is running for Secretary of State in Indiana. And he said, you know, we've got to do something to give some transparency to the election so people know that they're honest. Well, we need to make them honest, and we need to show people that they're honest. And he'd be the perfect person to do it. I mean, very detailed in terms of his knowledge. He is a neutral third party because the Democrats and Republicans have devolved in this kind of tribalism that you can't really trust either one of them with the elections.

As I said in 2016, I said the 2020 election is going to be a hacking contest, and it was. I didn't see the added dimension of all the mail corruption and all that stuff, the voting by mail and sending the ballots out that was the key thing we've always had absentee ballots but it was a controlled process you had to request it and there were other controls that on it this mail election M a IL was all uncontrolled and so now you have in Brazil you have truckers blocking the roads because they don't believe the election. And it's always the truckers who take the lead in freedom, isn't it? You got to get Canada, Brazil, all these different places. Truckers are evidently not taking Bolsonaro's narrow loss to socialist Lula very well,

as reports are coming in from across the country and Brazil of truck drivers blocking roads and demanding a recount. Some of them have even called on Bolsonaro to stage a military coup to retain power. And this is what's going to happen if we have elections that we can't trust, that nobody believes. And that's where we are. Nobody believes any of our institutions anymore. This is a hallmark of a fourth turning every 70 or 80 years. The institutions continually get corrupt, and people realize it. And so that is one of the things that happens during a fourth turning.

They said in each, the situation is different because there is no leadership to negotiate. You understand, this is a leaderless revolt. It is a grassroots revolt in Brazil. They're not being told that Bolsonaro hasn't said anything about it. He remained silent for several days. Everybody said, what is he going to do? He finally came out and he said, well, I'm going to follow the Constitution.

But he did not concede to Lula. He did not congratulate him. He did not say anything about the results. He says, I'm going to obey the Constitution. That's all he said. He offered no public comment on the trucker strike nor even on the election and did not concede that race and that was the situation as of monday um but um kept everybody guessing as to what he was going to do but again now he has come out and said that he will follow the Constitution. Did not concede, did not congratulate.

Again, the election is very, very close, just slightly over 50% for one, slightly under 50% for the other, just a little bit over 1%. percent uh so it was um lula getting 50.9 percent to bolsonaro's 49.1 percent of the vote and um so you know protesters are blocking things in more than 100 locations it's because there is no uh trust in the election because there is no trust in the election, because there is no transparency, no auditing capability, and that type of thing. But here we are in America, and of course, that would never happen here, right?

Of course, it is happening more and more frequently, and we are going to turn into Brazil if we're not careful. Media Research Center, the people that Guard works for, reported that Google manipulated searches in Senate races. Oh, really? Yeah, Google is a search engine that has now been changed to hide things. You understand that? And they have been hiding emails from the Republican Party. They have shown that as well. Is this election fraud?

Is it election manipulation? Well, I think it is. I think it is. You have Republicans are not going to come after it, but we know exactly what it is. They'll complain about it, but they won't do anything about it. 538, now the forecaster Nate silver who, uh, looks at congressional races and, um, in detail, he has now shifted his model to predict that the GOP is

slightly favored. And it was only about a month ago that it was, uh, favor to retake the Senate about a month ago. He was saying, no, retake the senate about a month ago he was saying no no the democrats have got you know like a 70 chance of taking the senate not even close for republicans and now it got closer and closer to where now the gop is favored by 538 to uh to take the Senate. Brian Franklin, thank you very much for the tip. He writes, good morning, David. I just had my wedding in the Smokies near Gatlinburg.

Oh, that's nice. That's a really nice setting. There's a lot of really nice places around here. It'd be nice if people would come here for all their weddings so we didn't have to travel all over the country. Such a beautiful area. Anyway, I appreciate the show and the work you guys do. Thank you very much. Appreciate that, Brian. Anyway, I appreciate the show and the work you guys do. Thank you very much. Appreciate that, Brian.

Well, congratulations to you. And, um, uh, we're about to come up to our 43rd anniversary of our wedding. Uh, so I hope, uh, you are as happy as Karen and I are. That's the best thing I could say to you. Um, so do we have any interference from Republican leaders themselves, from politicians? Why, yes, we have Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell defunded the Senate campaign in New Hampshire. You had somebody who was a conservative that he didn't like.

General Balduck, I guess is how you pronounce his name, B-O-L-D-U-C. I don't know anything about the candidate, but I do know that Mitch McConnell doesn't like him. And as he was pulling up close and tying up the race, Mitch McConnell tried to cut the legs out from underneath him by pulling out $5.6 million worth of financial support that had been earmarked for him. Mitch McConnell has the Senate Leadership Fund, a political action committee that he controls, and he just removed all that money at the last minute. And so General Balduck, who is running, says, we're getting a lot of response from that.

He said, people are now donating online. They're sending us checks. They're doing things to help us. Go to DonBallDuck.com, and you can do that. So he says, Mitch McConnell attacking him has actually helped him. You know, Mitch McConnell, and part of it was, you know, Roy Moore challenged him, you know. After he won the primary, it looked like he had won the general election because it was expected that that was going to

go Republican. And so Roy Moore went to Washington and walked around the Senate building there and talked about how he was going to directly challenge Mitch McConnell. And then lo and behold, you had the Washington Post and a bunch of people, there's one eruption of accusations of inappropriate behavior decades ago. The smear campaign immediately began. Funny how that happened. And he wound up losing that by a narrow margin. And, um, you know, the, the, uh, the guy who won that was voted out the next election, but, you know, Newt Gingrich did the same thing to Ron Paul. I remember when I was in Texas, I remember, uh, Ron Paul was, uh, an independent Congressman for several terms terms and then he resigned um and um i think it was in 86 that he resigned because he was fed up with the deficits that ronald reagan was making he was the

first person to endorse ronald reagan even back in 76 at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and supported him at the very beginning. And then when Ronald Reagan didn't get rid of the Department of Education, started creating massive deficits and doing a bunch of other things, Ron Paul resigned from the Republican Party in disgust, and then he ran two years later as a libertarian candidate for president. And then he got out of politics for a while, kind of, as much as somebody who is passionate about it can be.

But then he decided that he would run again for Congress as a Republican, and when he did, Newt Gingrich did everything he could to fight him. Didn't give him any money. Gave money to the Democrats to run against him. So we see this happening from these leaders. As much as they would like to be the majority leader, more than anything, they want to keep out anyone who is going to challenge them, challenge their number one, and is going to shake things up.

So when asked why McConnell removed support for his campaign, Balduck said he was unsure. I really don't know. He says, they don't explain their business plan to me. They've got a whole country to manage. They're doing their thing, and they're going to make their business decision. So he's not even challenging McConnell. He's not even complaining about the fact this guy obviously tried to cut his legs off.

So he is tied right now, even though he has been outspent by $9 million, and even though McConnell is not going to give him any money. However, Rick Scott, who has another, Senator Rick Scott, who has another political action committee, that one is the National Republican Senatorial Committee, as opposed to Mitch McConnell's Senate Leadership Fund. Rick Scott said, oh, I didn't know he did that. I was surprised he did that. And so he is going to send a million dollars after McConnell cut 5.6 million. So, you know, it's going to be by the grassroots or it isn't going to happen.

Fetterman, by the way, did not get the endorsement of a Democrat paper in this race. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette cited concerns over Fetterman's lack of transparency. See, that is the issue. They called it an impulse to conceal. And that should be the issue for the Democrats. Again, we have to have people who are honest, who are transparent.

And he was trying to conceal his health condition. His lack of transparency and refusing to release, this is what the paper wrote, in refusing to release his medical records is troubling. It suggests an impulse to conceal and a mistrust of the people. All candidates for a major elected office should release their medical records, as did Mr. Oz. If you want privacy, don't run for political office, said the paper. So they endorsed Fetterman's opponent, Oz,

which is, talk about Hobbes' choice there. Lee Zeldin. This is pretty amazing. In New York, Lee Zeldin has now taken the lead over Kathy Hokelberry, as Joe Slitty calls her, Hokel, which is really surprising. A Republican in New York has a lead over the Democrat incumbent in New York. So polls shows him at 48.7 percent shows her at 47.6 so it's narrow very narrow but it does show him in the lead and one of the reasons that that is happening is because and the democrats are concerned the democrat governor's association see unlike mitch mcconnell

uh they're funneling in millions of dollars into this race to buy ads at the last minute, evidently to call him a hatchet faced nutmeg addict or something like that, which would probably work, uh, because no, no, no matter how ridiculous the charges are, they stick. Uh, but the New York City Latino Grocers Association has raised $70,000 for Lee Zeldin. They said 70 entrepreneurs operating supermarkets, including Food Town, other things that you would not know, have reportedly given $1,000 each.

So 70 small business owners, Latinos, in New York City, giving $1,000 each. Why? Why are they doing that? Because of crime. The crime has gotten so bad. These are Hispanic supermarket owners who previously voted with the Democrats, but it's all about the crime.

We need to repeal cashless bail because they just, they arrest criminals, the police arrest criminals, and then the cashless bail because they just, they arrest criminal, the police arrest criminals and then the cashless bail system as well as the judicial just turns them right back out on the street. No, just like we were talking about with San Francisco, it's the Democrats, it's drugs, depravity and Democrat policies.

So we need to repeal cashless bail. We need to make our streets safe again. I'm running to take back our streets and to support unapologetically our men and women in law enforcement, says Zeldin. It's about crime. That's why you got 70 small grocery, Hispanic grocery owners giving $1,000 to him. And he's also getting support from Orthodox Jews in New York who typically vote Democrat. And they are going to vote Democrat in the other races. I mean, they're supporting Chuckie Schumer and the usual suspects, Letitia James, the attorney general. They have this group of Orthodoxodox jews these yeshivas uh and and again if you look at

what has happened they have taken on these orthodox jews over the vaccine mandates going back to 2019 saying you will do this even if you have religious objections you will do this in your private schools but it's really escalatedated under Hochul and her gun control laws saying, well, you know, I know that you may feel like you need to have security, but you're not going to be allowed to do that. You know, she has security. Nancy Pelosi has security. If Nancy Pelosi wants security, if Paul Pelosi wants security, they spend billions of dollars

to make themselves secure. They have big, you know, Praetorian guards that follow them everywhere. But you're not allowed to do that. And so she's fought synagogues and Jewish schools, and she's fought Christian schools and Christian churches. And so they fought her on this issue of whether or not they can do self-protection. So those are all issues. But then there's another issue that has come to the forefront.

So it's not just about vaccine mandates. It's not just about the right to self-defense, but it's now, listen to this. Zeldin has received unanimous endorsements from the Orthodox community activists on the strength of his vow to fight. And this is something new. This is what Kathy Hochul has put on, regulations enacted by the State Board of Regents in September that for the first time give government the ability to mandate specific secular studies curriculums on private schools. You know what this is going to be. It's going to be LGBT. It's going to be CRT. So they're going to say, I don't care if you've

got a private school. I don't care if you've got a private religious school. You're going to teach this. And that was it. You know, again, they're Democrats. They've always voted Democrats. But they've got these issues, self-defense, you know, private, you're making your own health care decisions, parents' rights, educational freedom. So for all those reasons they're voting against hokal and endorsing zelden so it's going to be interesting to see what happens with that by the way i it's always amusing to me when i see articles like this one in the daily caller where they say fetterman says tax cuts are the real cause of inflation. They don't understand MMT.

You know, when you look at the Inflation Reduction Act, as I talked about, I said the whole reason they call it that was because of this bogus economic theory called MMT. And, you know, it's not that they're clueless, that they don't understand what's going on. They know exactly what is going on. And their idea is that they give money to their friends, and that's a good thing. But if we get inflation, then what they do is they take money away from their enemies. That's what MMT is all about.

But people look at this and say, do you believe these people? They think that inflation comes from not taxing people enough. is all about. It's just, but you know, people look at this and say, you believe these people, they think that inflation comes from, um, not taxing people enough. And it's kind of the, kind of like the astonishment from Nancy Pelosi, when she said about Obamacare, we're going to have to pass it to find out what's in it. Well, she was talking about how rules are made. Now they don't make laws anymore. For the most part, they create talking about how rules are made now. They don't make laws anymore for the most part. They pass an agenda. They might create a bureaucracy or they will hand off their agenda to an existing bureaucracy and they will fill in the details. That's how things are done now. And so when all these people say, can you believe her? Is she senile or something?

It's like, no, you just don't understand how they've changed the system. Congress doesn't write laws. The bureaucracy writes the rules so that you don't have any due process, protection against excessive fines and so forth. It's taxation without representation. It's regulation without representation. In Arizona, we have the Republican candidates, very, very narrow difference between Blake Masters and Mark Kelly. And so the Arizona Libertarian has dropped out

and endorsed the Republican in this race because he did not want to get in the way of that. And I understand what he's doing, and it's probably a wise decision to make based on who Mark Kelly is. I just think, though, when you look at all of the angst from the establishment Republican, and especially from Sarah Palin

about what's going on in Alaska, if we could do it honestly and with transparency, this whole idea of ranked preferential voting is a really good idea, but it does have some problems with the implementation of it. But what that does is that allows people to have their first choice, their second choice, their third choice, and it lets them, you know, if nobody gets past 50%, they throw out the lowest person. And then they look at what the second choice was for the person that they just threw out, and they reallocate those votes. The bottom line for all the complaining and whining of Sarah Palin, the problem for her was, in a race with two Republicans and a Democrat, she was not the second choice for most Republicans for whom she was not the first choice.

There were a lot of Republicans for whom Sarah Palin was not the first or the second choice. That's her problem. That's not a problem with proportional, with ranked preference voting. Ted Cruz is calling out Trump for not opening up his war chest to support Republicans in tight races. He says he's got $100 million and he's spending almost none of it. Well, he did that with Stop the Steal stuff.

You know, Save America was what he called it. You know, Stop the Steal was a grift that Roger and Alex were running with Ali Alexander. But Trump had a big one. He made $250 million. I don't know what Alex and Roger made out of their scam, but Trump did the Save America thing. He made more money after the election than he did before. That's what he does. You know, he, this is a grift for Trump. And so I'm glad that Ted Cruz is calling him out

on this. He needs to, because, you know, Trump is trump is is not helping the republicans and yet most people are at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee afraid to point that out he truly is an emperor who has no clothes we'll be right back Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show all right uh youtube let's talk about abortion

because we're talking about elections that has always been a big part of the election, and it is the central issue for the Democrats. They think that's a winning issue for them, and Republicans think it's a losing issue to support life. Isn't that sad? They started running from it as soon as you had the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, all of these proudly pro-life Republicans making all of these statements about what they believe and what we should do, they knew that if nobody was going to challenge, nobody was going to challenge the Supreme Court. And so, and nobody really expected the Supreme Court to take away their power from the inside. It truly was a miracle. And so as soon as that happened, they were going back and scrubbing their websites left and right to tone it down.

And these are the same people who, you know, when it comes to mutilating kids after they're born, you know, they're sucking up to the LGBT. Trump at Mar-a-Lago, I mean, they're honoring Melania Trump and having events there. You know, the Republican Party is making big overtures to the LGBT behind the scenes. They try to play it both ways.

Well, YouTube is now putting disclaimer on pro-life videos. And this disclaimer says, well, you need to get the real for more context. You need to go here. And if you go there, it's a link to abortion businesses. The disclaimer itself falsely claims that abortion is only committed, quote, by a licensed health care professional. And here's where you can get it. Right. But as LifeSite News points out, I'm sorry, this is WND.

Chemical abortions via the abortion pill now make up the majority of abortions. And a high percentage of these are self-managed, meaning some women never consult with a health care professional before taking the drugs. If you want to hear a testimony about what happened with a chemical do-it-yourself-at-home abortion, listen to Abby Johnson talk about what it did to her. Oh, yeah, safe. Well, let's give you some context about this. Do you think unborn babies are just clumps of cells? Well, as LifeSite News says, these videos will make you think again. As a matter of fact, this is a former Planned Parenthood manager, Sue Thayer, describing in a new video how abortion facility workers can see with their own eyes that the children being aborted are real human beings

and not just, in her words, clump of cells. I said, why are there three arms? And we're looking, and the gal training me said, twins, it was twins. Sue, you described when you were first being trained at Planned Parenthood, they sent you to an actual abortion room to witness the procedure. Can you tell us about that experience? Well, when you first start out, they have the trainees stand by the door. And I did that for the first two or three procedures. And I finally said, why? Why

does that happen? And she said, said well usually when somebody comes in for the first time they pass out and I didn't I didn't pass out so after I don't know a few were done they let me start moving closer so I could get to the foot of the bed and be able to see you know what was what was happening but the whole procedure only takes just three or four minutes and what they call the contents of uterus or products of conception are emptied into this gallon jar and they turn it off and take this suction thing off the gallon jar and set it in the the pass-through and it goes in to the dirty lab so then you go around the corner goes into the dirty lab.

So then you go around the corner and into the dirty lab, take the jar out, put it in this big, like a Rubbermaid colander and rinse it with this big hose. Then you dump it in this little glass jar and put it on this little shelf that has this bright light. And you bring the light over it and you kind of piece it back together and try to see if you got all the parts. And I remember standing there looking at that

and I said, why are there three arms? You know, and we're looking and the gal training me said, twins, it was twins. And I said, you know, do you tell the mom that she had twins? And she says, no, it usually just upsets them. Then, of course, this jar, this little glass bowl with this baby, depending on how far along the baby was, there's this big white porcelain sink. And they would dump it in there, rinse it, put the bowl back to use next time, and hit the plunger, and it would flush, kind of like a toilet.

And I just remember standing there thinking, all those babies are in the Des Moines sewer system. In later time that I would be there, they were putting those babies in little red bags with a twist tie, and then they'd fling them in the freezer. And I remember kind of thinking, I wonder what they do with those, because I thought if there's a buck to be made, they will sell those. Isn't that amazing?

Now, why is it that Republicans are afraid to expose this truth? And they say Planned Parenthood does less than 2% of breast exams, less than 1% of U.S. PAP tests, less than 2% of cancer screenings. So is this about women's health care? No, it's not. But again, why are Republican candidates afraid to expose that? Why are they afraid to expose what's been done with the pharmaceutical industry to harm people?

They're running like cowards. From life and death, truth. And you have people like Lindsey Graham, who wants to federalize this again. And, of course, the Democrats as a group want to federalize it in the other direction. And, of course, if Lindsey Graham is successful in getting Republican colleagues to federalize a prohibition of abortion at the federal level, that will be reversed in no time at all by Democrats. Now, taking a life is not something that should be up for a vote. And it is something that we're going to be able to fight more effectively at the local level simply because these people are such cowards about this type of thing. So as the article LifeSite News says, there's no excuse for the ignorance. We can glance at an ultrasound

screen. We can even get the information on YouTube for the time being and be astonished at the miracle of life in all of its stages as it's developing. And they have in this article a lot of links to places where they're starting to put together projects like this one, the Endowment for Human Development, a scientific nonprofit that partnered with National Geographic to create a DVD called The Biology of Prenatal Development. So it's got a lot of scientific facts. It's got detailed, clear ultrasounds. It's got in utero pictures that show step-by-step development of humans in the mother's womb. While science has known for decades, they say that a child's heart starts beating by 21 days.

A recent scientific discovery suggests the first beats may actually occur at 16 days. The way we combat this is with truth. And of course, you know, because we have people who commit murder and all kinds of crimes against their fellow man, you will still have people, even if they know that it is murder, they will still do it and they'll do it for money. Uh, but,

um, that's why we have the government to stop people like that. Murderers, killers for hire. And that's what the government should be doing. Now, this next video I'm going to play for you is incredibly powerful. So powerful that I would warn you that if you're listening to this or watching this and you don't want to see this, skip ahead four minutes when I start playing this thing.

This is animated and it is narrated by Kevin Sorbo, who is a Christian actor. He played Hercules on TV. And it is based on a true story. The video is called The Procedure. It's four minutes long. It's an animated clip and it is based, the narration is based on the account of a sonographer who witnessed the procedure. And it is really heartbreaking, very upsetting. So Karen, do not watch this and anybody else. But I wanted you to see this because it is so powerful.

The truth is powerful. The truth doesn't need to be defended. It needs to be unleashed. And if you've got somebody, I tweeted this out yesterday, and I said, for those of you who say that this is about a woman's right to choose, typically you are the people who are putting masks on us, who are demanding that we stay under house arrest or get an untested vaccine. You're not about choice. And you're denying the humanity of the baby that is being destroyed. Those are the people who need to see this. If

you're pro-life, you don't need to see this. It's a very upsetting scene, but you may want to see this so that you can unleash this truth, this very disturbing, powerful truth, on those who are still pushing lies for whatever purpose. I had just arrived at work as the hospital's lead sonographer and was looking at the patient's schedule for the day when my boss told me to go immediately to the OR. The surgeon was requesting ultrasound guidance. That was all the information I was given. I had no idea what I was walking into. I wheeled the ultrasound machine into the OR. The patient was already sedated on the operating

table. Plugging in the machine, I waited for instructions from the doctor. He barked at me to place the ultrasound probe on the patient's pelvis so he wouldn't perforate her uterus. Still confused about the procedure, I did as he asked and realized the woman was pregnant. She was in her second trimester, so I easily determined the gender of her baby, a little girl. Stunned, I watched the doctor thrust a catheter into the amniotic sac the fetus dodged the catheter and tried to hide in the top of her mother's uterus to get away in horror i watched as he inserted a forceps clamp and grabbed her tiny leg she writhed around in pain trying to break free, but there was nowhere for her to go. Then the doctor pulled hard until her leg ripped away from her body.

She recoiled and violently twisted around in pain and curled herself into a tight ball. But it was no use. The clamp grabbed her arm and she struggled to pull away. Her movements weakened now because she was dying. He pulled her arm off of her body. My vision blurred. My eyes filled with tears. The child again curled herself into a tight ball but again the device grabbed her other leg and it was ripped from her body.

By now, her heartbeat had slowed significantly. But she was still alive. The clamp grabbed her last limb and ripped it off. She wiggled and squirmed around, and then... Her heart finally stopped beating. I announced that there was no more cardiac activity. The nurse and scrub tech in the room gasped, realizing for the first time that this was happening to a fetus that was still alive.

The remaining body parts, the head and torso, were removed. Placenta was removed and a final look with ultrasound revealed all products of conception were removed. Placenta was removed and a final look with ultrasound revealed all products of conception were removed. I was told I could leave the room. Up until that moment, I had been frozen. I silently removed the ultrasound machine from the operating room, went directly to the locker room

and threw up. I quit my job at that hospital shortly after. I told my boss I would never again participate in that type of procedure. I was having nightmares and could not escape the memory of what I had witnessed. I would never again assist in the murder of a child. It was over 20 years ago, but it's just as vivid in my mind today as the day it happened. The saddest part is that this procedure is still happening today. People have no idea we are murdering babies in this way. They think it isn't a person, that it's just a mass of tissue. I'm so sorry for what happened to this little girl.

For what I did to her. I'm sorry, sweetheart. I'm so sorry. Wow. Truly is amazing. It's amazing, isn't it, that this is still going on? How was it that it went on for so long? We had the tools to stop it.

We had gutless politicians and an ignorant population refusing to use the Tenth Amendment, which ultimately, as I said for years, stopped the killing. Stand up for the Tenth Amendment. That's the Constitution. If you stand for the law and if you stand for life, you could have ended this without 63 million of those. But they didn't. Eventually, the Supreme Court said, yeah, the Tenth Amendment says this decision belongs at the states. And so do not allow Lindsey Graham and the Democrats to bring this back and federalize it again.

We have to stop this abomination. The Republicans, gutless Republicans, afraid to defend this, afraid to unleash the truth on people. You know, from the time I've been looking at this in the late 1980s, they do everything they can to try to hide what's really going on. They don't want people to, you look at the wrath of Elizabeth Warren, how angry she gets when people go to clinics because now they can see with ultrasound what this guy saw. Don't want them to see what's going on. Years before that, they would do everything they could to stop people from putting pictures up of aborted babies like you just saw.

Could not stand that truth. They would do anything to stop that. Fox News fired Matt Drudge, and he did it deliberately, he told me. He said, yeah, I did that because I wanted to get out of my contract. He put up the picture of baby Samuel, and that was a live baby that was being operated on. It was not being killed. His spine was being fixed in utero.

But he reached up with that tiny hand, grabbed that finger of that doctor. And they don't just, it isn't just that Fox News and the establishment media and the Republicans and the Democrats don't want you to see the murder. They don't want you to see the humanity. They don't want you to see the humanity. That's what Fox News fired Matt Drudge for,

because they didn't want the humanity shown. And so you have Hillary Clinton tweeting out this video where they think that this is a winning issue for them. If only we would defend life and the truth and the Constitution, that would be a winning issue for them. If only we would defend life and the truth and the Constitution, that would be a win. We have people who are afraid to do that, ashamed to do that, who have a different agenda, frankly.

And so in this particular ad, again, pushed out by Hillary Clinton, a pro-life woman said she was featured in it. She said, I was outraged that she featured me in a pro-choice ad, a pro-abortion ad. Really? You want to be honest about it? Shared by Hillary Clinton and by Governor Gavin Newsom in support of a proposal to enshrine abortion in California's state constitution.

In an open letter she posted on her Twitter account, October 20th, Macy Petty excoriated Clinton, Newsom, and those behind the ad, claiming that they were doing so, that they were misusing her image to promote what she said was demonic activity. Now, if you just saw that video, do you think that that's an overstatement? They call that demonic? I don't.

She said the video disseminated by Clinton, Newsom, and many others briefly depicts Macy Petty collapsing on the ground in tears outside the Supreme Court as the announcement came in June that Roe v. Wade had been overturned. Superimposed over the image was the word sad, sad, implying that her reaction was one of devastation, but she said it was one of joy. And so she replied to that.

She said, hey, Hillary, I'm the girl crying in the video, and those are happy tears because I just witnessed a miracle. Here's the commercial. When this happened, we got mad, sad, scared. But now we can get to work. While some states are already on the attack, Indiana passing a near total ban, this November, Californians can protect the right to reproductive freedom for generations because we're not going back. PROC 1 will put the fundamental right to abortion and fundamental right to contraceptives into our state constitution. So no matter who controls government, your personal medical decisions,

including abortion and contraception, will be between you and your provider. Keeping politicians out of our bedrooms and out of our doctor's offices. But first, Prop 1 has to pass. That's where the work part comes in. Isn't that amazing? Keeping doctors out of our personal lives and keeping politicians out of our doctor relationship. These same people. Look at what they did with the pandemic, with the vaccines, with everything else. What a bunch of demonic, murdering liars they are. Isn't it just disgusting? She was disgusted with that as well.

These people, one thing I agree with them, we are not going back. We're not going to go back to a situation where Planned Parenthood can get obscenely rich murdering people. And we've got to stop the pharmaceutical companies getting obscenely rich, murdering people as well. We need to abort these Trump shots. We'll be right back. We'll talk about Twitter when we return. And the blue checks, what is going to be happening with that?

Stay with us. Top, top, top, hip-hop. Top, top, top, hip-hop. Top, top, hip-hop. Hip, hip, hip. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, before I talk about the $20 or $8 or whatever it's going to be, get a blue check on Twitter. I want to thank all of you who have supported us. My family is constantly telling me, you've got to talk a little bit more about what's going on at the website and the gas gauge and things like that. We finished the month at about seven-eighths of the budget,

and so I appreciate that, everybody. And we have sold our first coin, our first challenge coin, and we just got that up on the website. And, by the way, this is what it looks like. But, again, the picture does not do it justice. I think you're going to – well,'s sorry that's enough that's the sticker and that's a listener said that time he said here's what i did with your sticker but this is a challenge coin uh both front and back has the website on it david knight show uh chess piece

and on the back it's got a microphone i want to thank jason parker did a great job of designing that uh he was also in the military and so this idea of a challenge coin, our first customer, somebody who was in the military, said, can't wait for the challenge coin being an ex-Delta Force soldier. Well, right? RS and SS. He says, I can't wait for the tumbler and the shirt so I can promote the truth. Well, thank you very much. He says, God bless you and your family. Well, thank you. God bless you. I appreciate what you have done. And so we've got the first one out. It took us a little bit of time to get things together and to put it together, but we do have a nice little stand that my son has 3D printed and they put together the packaging, had to get the shipping stuff together as well. So that's all there and they're ready to go. So

if you want to check that out, go to thed Knight show.com. And, um, Karen also said, you need the picture that we have of the shirt is not really good because it just shows kind of the left chest logo, which is now folded up on this one, but it doesn't really show the back. So we've got to change the way it's set up. And it's actually got a very nice design on the back. They leave it there on the table. So I'll show it to you. So today I will show it to you. And, uh, so it's very nice design on the back. They leave it there on the table so that I'll show it to you. So today I will show it to you. And so it's got that design on the back, and then it's got a small left chest logo on the front. This is not the front. We did not want to do a really big design on the front.

The big designs, as we do them, we'll put them on the back and just have some kind of a left chest logo on it. Let's talk about Twitter because, you know, even Elon Musk, the richest man in the world needs to keep the show going. He said, we've got to pay the bills. I saw somebody, uh, uh, doing a, a plea for, uh, donations and said, uh, we don't want your money, but the people we owe money to want it really badly. Elon Musk, the richest man in the world can even say that. And as he said, well, we're thinking we're going to charge people $20 for the blue check. Stephen King, who has a blue check and who has millions of simoleons himself was very upset about that.

He says, F that they should pay me. Oh, really? I don't read your books. They're garbage. But anyway, so yeah, in terms of $20 a month, I looked at that. It's like, no, you know, I support BitChute because BitChute supports free speech. I support Gab because they support free speech. And BitChute is so heavily censored that every time we put up a BitChute video and click on it, Twitter will say, that's a dangerous link. As if you're going

to somehow get viruses put on your computer and that type of thing. It's a dangerous site. It is. It's dangerous because of the ideas you'll be exposed to. It's dangerous because there's dangerous truth there. And so when they put that thing up and block your link, there is a way that you can proceed, but it's very, very small and it's in the lower right-hand corner. It says, go ahead anyway. I know this is dangerous. I know I'm going to die, but I want to go to bit shoot anyway.

And now they've added a new thing. And this is a new wrinkle that's just been added uh just before elon musk took over and that is if you try to retweet or like even like one of the posts that i put up that has a link to a bit shoot video it comes up and warns you about that and tries to discourage you from doing that and so you know when i look at all this stuff, it's like, you know, I don't know about this blue check stuff because years ago when they began this and they began it because they said, well, you know, we want to validate that people are real. That was one of the ways that they were looking at bots.

And what Elon Musk is saying, you know, it's not just about the money, but he and other financial backers are saying, you know, we've got a big bot problem on Twitter. And one of the ways that we do this is by the verification. And so the verification, when they started doing it, I think it was back in 2009, that they started doing the blue check thing. I didn't get onto Twitter until 2012. Uh, and, um, but, uh, you know, the, uh, I didn't want to get a blue check. Um, even though, you know, I got up to 150,000 on Twitter. Um, it's more than double that on gab, but, um, I, yeah, I just don't hang out. I don't get all that much engagement on

social media because I don't hang out there, but on Twitter, I'm heavily censored on Twitter. They have purged people on a regular basis. You know, hundreds. It would happen during the week. And then over the weekend, it would start to go up. And then during the week, you know, hundreds a day. They would take off. You know, I mean, I'm sick of that whole game.

I'm really sick of it. And I don't want to give any money to an organization like that. We'll see what's going to happen with it. I don't know what Musk is going to do with content moderation, but honestly, I don't trust him. I don't trust any of these people. I did not get the blue checkmark before when it was free because what they wanted was a lot of personal information about me. And I understand it was to verify that it was a real person. But I looked at it and said, you know, I think they got enough information about me and I understand it was, um, it was to verify that it was a real person. But I looked at it and said, you know, I think they got enough information about

me and I'm not going to give them any more, so I never did get the blue check mark. And then they got to be very, very stingy about it. And they completely shut the program down for a while. And then even while it was shut down, though, you had people like David hog after that Florida shooting and after he became a big gun control advocate. All of a sudden, he shows up on Twitter and gets a blue checkmark and gets hundreds of thousands of people following him just like that.

Why? Because they were promoting everything that he did. That's the site. The blue check has literally become a badge of honor among social media savvy leftists. Well, again, I don't really care about that. And again, I don't want to support a site that is based on being the deputized state. We've got the deep state. That's the bureaucracy.

People like Fauci. Corporations like Twitter and Facebook and Google are the deputized state. And I think they're even more dangerous because they are also unelected. They're also unaccountable, but they're also providing a plausible deniability to the government, doing things for the government that the government is prohibited from doing but doing it because the government is telling them to do it uh thank you very much angus mustang thank you very much for the tip he says this should get two gallons of gas for the tank as long as it isn't diesel thank you appreciate that yeah it isn't diesel i've had diesel and I can't believe the price of diesel. When we bought a diesel car, I've had two diesel cars in the past.

Um, and, um, uh, I mean, one of the reasons I got the first diesel car was because diesel was cheaper than regular and it should be because there's less refinery going on with it, but the government has forced the price up with their designer fuels. Just like they, just like Gavin Newsom and the California people have done in California with regular, with other grades of gasoline. Anyway, Stephen King has got close to 7 million followers. Can you believe that? And he has used his site to spread news that is fake and false about Governor DeSantis,

spread false information about Florida's COVID death count. Yeah, this guy is a horror fiction writer. And so he's been very prominent in putting out a lot of horror fiction for the COVID fans. A lot of fan fiction about how horrible the pandemic was and how the vaccine is going to save you. Yeah, that's Stephen King. So Elon Musk said he is going to, after criticism from people, he said, well, all right, we'll drop it to $8 a month, saying that subscribers will get priority in replies, mentions, and searches, the ability to post long video and audio.

And that would be the only thing that I would look at that I, but I still don't want to give them money. I'm still reluctant to, but I'm looking at, Oh, that's tempting if I could put up a longer video, uh, we are allowed to, we do somehow because it's a live stream, we can put up the full show on Twitter. But if I want to do a video cut, I've got to be very careful to keep it under two minutes.

Sometimes I'll have, you know, I wouldn't want to put up a full report there perhaps, but you know, I'll keep it, keep it short. If I could do something maybe, you know, between two and three minutes, uh, that might be useful anyway. Um, in terms of content moderation and censorship, where that's going to be there, he says they are going to have a content moderation thought police. Yeah, they are. Right now, they say that this has been cut. The people who can actually mess with you, as they've been messing with me, has been cut from hundreds of people to around 15 people last week,

according to sources talking about Musk and his war cabinet. According to Bloomberg, his war cabinet. According to Bloomberg, his war cabinet has frozen some employee access to internet tools used for content moderation and the enforcement of other policies, neutering staff's abilities to alter or penalize accounts that break rules around misleading information, offensive posts, and hate speech. Again, all you have to have is some employee who doesn't like what I have to say about transgenders

and I become their personal mission. And every time they go on vacation, my accounts would go up when they would come back. When they come back from the weekend, they'd start purging people from the account. They will

also not be able to banish highly credentialed doctors and researchers who post divergent COVID-19 narrative. Well, that would be good. All but the most high impact violations are set for manual review will remain on the platform. Twitter staff will use dashboards known as agent tools. The problem is it isn't just the hundreds of people within Twitter, but it's people who are outside of Twitter as well. And they have not stopped that. So that still continues.

And so what Elon Musk said was, he said, the current system for allocating blue check marks, which uses a trustworthy source. He calls that BS. He says the Twitter's current Lords and peasants system for who has or doesn't have a blue check mark is BS power to the people. Get a blue check for $8 a month. So there you go. Um, I,

I don't know. I still, we have to wait and see what happens with Twitter, but you know, this guy is, um, he pushes transhumanism. He pushes ESG. As a matter of fact, he's made his fortune doing everything that the government wants or the environmental aspect.

That's the key thing there. And, um, you know, you have now a lot of people in government saying he's, he's got too much power. He's got too much power. He's got too much money. He's dangerous. Well, he's dangerous because of his push for transhumanism, his intent to hack into the brain and all the rest of the stuff, which is what the government wants. He's dangerous because he's been doing what the government wants with the climate change agenda, with the environmental agenda, with the transhumanism and the brain hacking. And the brain hacking, that has been one of the biggest priorities of the government and of the deep state going back to the mid-20th century. That's where the CIA and the Operation

Paperclip people, where they began all of the bioweapon engineering and all the rest of the stuff, they were always focused on reading and manipulating people's minds, playing mind games with them. And there's a lot of that in The Prisoner, which was done in the early 1960s. Everybody knew it even then. And so they've now doubled down on it. They're looking for other, you know, they were using psychological stuff, occultic stuff, chemical stuff, LSD and other things like that to try to manipulate and control people's minds.

Now they're trying to use electrical signals to read and write. That is the goal of DARPA and these other people. So Elon Musk is dangerous because of his alliance with the government, but the government now is being concerned about that, and it's concerned about ways. Here's something else that shows just how dangerous this transhumanist globalist is. Here's his Halloween costume. Now we got some, evidently it was false information that was put out by a Swedish actress saying that she was going to Romania to

Dracula's castle where they were having a costume party. Elon Musk had rented it. Evidently that did not happen because he was at this costume party. And if you get a closeup of what he was wearing, and I don't have the third picture here that shows it, well, you know, that's kind of a Baphomet devil's head when you look at it closely. And just in case you think that we're implying that that isn't the case, when you get in close to it, yeah, see if you can get in there close, it's still because it's at the side angle, you can't see.

Yeah, there it is, right there in the center of that Baphomet head. He's got a cross that is upside down just in case you thought that it wasn't satanic. Yeah, it actually was, uh, before we get our guest on, uh,

I want to talk a little bit about, uh, what is happening with the, um, with the, uh, vaccines, because we're going to be talking about the pharmaceutical

industry when he joins us. And there's an excellent piece from Babylon Bee, where they talk about the Atlantic, saying, can't we just move on with this stuff? Well, I think we do need to move on with it, but we need to move on with it not with amnesty but with justice. But I'm going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back to take a short look at that before our guest joins us. Using free speech to free minds.

It's the David Knight Show. And now, Your Highness, we will discuss the location of your hidden little face. Oh, you know, even Darth Vader uses needles and vaccines, right? The Galactic Empire requests amnesty for anyone who may have gotten carried away and blown up a planet. This is the bad one. Acknowledging past decisions that, while well-intended, were destructive, and learning a ragtag team of rebels might win again, the Galactic Empire has proposed amnesty for anyone who might have gotten a little carried away and blown up several planets. This is supposed to be a happy galaxy. Let's not bicker and argue about who annihilated whose planet.

That's the Grand Moff. And a guest opinion piece published by The Atlantic after polls showed destroying Alderaan just to get a politician to squeal did not sit well with the galaxy's citizens. Oopsies happen, says the Grand Mufti. Forgive and forget, I always say. Yeah, that sounds very much like what we have just seen, doesn't it? We have to put these fights aside and declare a planetary destruction amnesty. We can forgive the hard calls that people had no choice to make with imperfect knowledge.

Moving on is crucial now. Because blowing up planets created many problems that we need to solve. You know, together. When asked to comment about Grand Moff Kane's amnesty proposal, the residents of Alderaan gave no reply. So, yeah, Biden is looking for amnesty as well. Biden is asking for COVID amnesty, for Afghanistan pullout amnesty, for gas prices amnesty, for inflation amnesty, for student loan amnesty, for war with Russia amnesty, for nuclear Armageddon

amnesty. You know, blowing up a planet. And weaponizing the FBI against political enemies amnesty for war with Russia. Amnesty for nuclear Armageddon. Amnesty, you know, blowing up a planet. And weaponizing the FBI against political enemies. Amnesty. This also from the Babylon Bee. A growing number of progressives are requesting amnesty for extreme COVID policies that shattered countless lives. Claiming it was an ignorance. We need to forgive each other, they say.

For what we have said to each other during COVID, said Biden, we also need to let bygones be bygones. And when it comes to how I handled COVID, mandated vaccines, the pullout from Afghanistan, how I made gas prices soar, caused massive inflation, made taxpayers foot the bill for the student loans, allowed a war to start with Russia, got on track for nuclear Armageddon, printed money like there's no tomorrow and sent it all to Ukraine and weaponize the FBI against my political enemies. I need Amnesty for those things, folks. Come on, man. It's not hard.

Let's just live and let live here, says Joe Biden. Well, as usual, Babylon Bee nailed it. And this is something that has really resonated with many people like me who have been opposing this. Everybody who has opposed it is really just astounded at this woman, at this magazine, both of whom have been ruthless in what they've demanded in terms of persecution, in terms of dystopian, draconian measures. You murderous hypocrites, some say. Outrage ensues across social media, as the Atlantic suggests amnesty for pandemic authoritarians. We need to forgive each other for what we have done. We were in the dark, writes the

Brown professor, Emily Oster. Let's acknowledge that we made complicated choices in the face of deep uncertainty. Well, that's, as I pointed out yesterday, that's not at all what happened. Daily Skeptic said there's a lot wrong here. First, no, you don't get to advocate policies that do extraordinary harm to others against the wishes. And then say you didn't know any better at the time. Hey, sorry, you lost your job because of the vaccine. It doesn't work. And sorry, your grandmother died alone. And you couldn't have a funeral.

And your brother's business was needlessly destroyed. And your kids have weird heart problems. But let's just admit we were all wrong and let's just call it truth, hey? It's too bad we shut the entire economy down and took on tyrannical powers that have never been used before in this country. Looking back, you should have been able to go to church, use public parks while we let people riot in the streets. But, you know, it was a confusing time. Hey, I'm sorry we scared the hell out of you and lied for years and years. This is Claremont Institute's senior fellow Matthew Peterson description of it. Sorry we persecuted and censored anybody who disagreed with us. But, you know, there was an

election going on. We really wanted to beat Donald Trump. So it was important to radically politicize the science, even if it destroyed our children's lives. Okay. Yeah. We said unvaccinated people should die. They should not get healthcare. While we never questioned anything from big pharma once, but we were compassionate people, which is why even though we shut down the entire economy and also bankrupted the nation and caused inflation, you're welcome. Let's be friends. Yeah, that's basically what they're saying to everybody. So how do we handle this?

Again, you know, are we going to at least let's stop this. You understand they've just hit pause. They haven't hit the stop button. You know the difference, right? We've all had VCRs. We've all had VCRs. We've all had tape recorders. We've all seen the pause and the play buttons, even if we have streamed it, right? You know the difference between pause and stop. We're in the pause right now.

They haven't stopped anything. They haven't pulled back any of the authority they claimed, any of the authority that they usurped, any of the things that they did under color of law. They haven't stopped any of that. They haven't stopped any of the authority that they usurped, any of the things that they did under color of law. They haven't stopped any of that. They haven't stopped any of the executive orders. They're bragging about how they're going to make this an annual thing in terms of selling these genetic code injections, these mRNA Trump shots. It's going to be an annual thing.

They're going to keep extending this. As a matter of fact, you got the criminal organization. And I say that because they have been convicted over and over and over again, fined billions of dollars. Pfizer is a criminal, racketeering, and influence corrupt organization. And they are now going to raise, you want to talk about inflation? They're going to raise the price of the vaccine, as I reported last week, by more than 400%. It's $30 right now the government is paying them.

They're going to go up to $130. That's more than 400% inflation. So, you know, as you're looking at what's happening to fuel costs and food costs and all the rest of the stuff that Biden is pushing on us? And he says, well, you know, those oil companies, they're just war profiteering. Are they really? Do you think that maybe the military industrial complex is war profiteering? Do you think that maybe Raytheon, where Austin, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, they had to waive the regulations because he'd been working for Raytheon for so long. He'd been away from the military for so long.

They had to change the rules to get him back in. And so is Raytheon, is the military industrial complex, are they making war profits that are obscene off of this stuff? Are the pharmaceutical companies making obscene profits off of this COVID war? Oh, you bet. One thing I'll say about the oil corporations is if they're making obscene profits,

at least they're not killing anybody like the pharmaceutical industry and the military industrial complex to have their so-called wars. They're making big profits and and so are food companies, because of inflation and things like that, because they've been able to raise the price. People now are expecting the prices to go up,

so they can raise the prices by a tremendous amount. But it's the food and fuel are not things that are killing people. It's the pharmaceutical companies and the military industrial complex, but you don't see Biden complaining about those. He complains about the food and the fuel. He doesn't complain about the people who are making obscene profits, killing people. All right, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back with our guest. And we're going to talk about how he sees this.

He's been on the money in terms of exposing the agenda that these people have. So we're going to be right back with Rabbi David Smith. Stay with us. We'll be right back. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, joining us now is Rabbi David Smith, and he has seen what this thing looks like. He's been involved in pushing back against these vaccine mandates

when they were saying, well, you've got to get the MMR shot. We don't really care what your private school, what your religious objections to this. No, you're going to get it. And so he's been pushing back against this. He's been spot on with all of it. And he contacted me and said, you know, all this stuff that's being pushed out about gain of function is really being done to panic people. And I really agree with that agenda.

So I wanted to get him on to talk about that. He's been right about the tests and many other things. So joining us now is Rabbi David Smith. Thank you for joining us, sir. Thank you, Mr. Knight. Thanks for being here. Yeah, let's talk a little bit about the gain-of-function stuff, because we've had this news release coming out from Boston University,

and they were talking about how they had produced something in the lab that had a case fatality rate of 80%, but don't worry, because it's just with rats. But at the same time, this could get out and that type of thing. As we look at this, Dr. McCullough had an article talking about the Unholy Alliance, faith leaders who are pushing pharma fraud. And this has been one of my key issues, trusted leaders. And this is something that they always plotted, too. They said, well, let's get trusted leaders in the community.

Let's go into the black community. We know there's a lot of people there that don't trust the government because of what happened with the Tuskegee Institute thing. So let's go in and we'll get political leaders. We'll get religious leaders in the black community. We'll do the same thing in community after community. We'll go in the white evangelicals and we'll get pastors who will push this. And Curtis Chang, who I talked about, was heavily funded by the Ad Council and these other groups to do exactly that. And he was able to go in and get people who had very large churches like Robert Jeffress up in Dallas connected to Donald Trump.

And they would put together videos to lay out how they were going to talk to their people and convince them that they needed to do that. All right, I see that we've got the guests back, and I don't hear any noise on the line now, so maybe we're good. Let's try that again. Rabbi Smith, are you there? That's thing one, two, three. Okay, good.

Yeah, we got good sound this time. Okay, great. I had just asked you about how you see this concern that's being put out by the press, because now we've had a second report to scare people about gain-of-function research that is continuing to go on. What do you see behind this, and what are your concerns about gain-of-function and about the fear campaign that is surrounding it as well? Well, let's go back to first principles and realize that Sun Tzu writes in The Art of War that the goal is to get the enemy defeated without firing a single shot.

And how could that be accomplished? Let's imagine that they could, instead of having to use nuclear weapons or any sort of even an invasion, if they could get the United States of America to completely shut down its means of production, shut down its agricultural, shut down its food production, shut down its transportation, shut down its education. That's a pretty great accomplishment without firing a single shot. So in wave one, they told people that there was something that came from a bat that was going around causing people to get sick. And that caused the United States to lock itself down and basically disable itself, dismantle itself.

Now that I think is really, um, an amateur or a beginning move. You still okay on the sound? Uh, it's starting to creep back in. The noise is starting to creep back in. I'm not sure, but let's go ahead and continue. Yeah. You're on the roll. So imagine that they could get you and me

to be afraid not of something that has maybe a 0.17 fatality rate or maybe a three percent fatality rate but something that's a 50 fatality well there if there's nothing like that exists in nature so they are coming with this idea that they can this myth really mythology like a temple of scientists worshiping the scientists that they have this superpowers that they can, this myth, really mythology, like a temple of scientists worshipping the scientists that they have this super powers that they can create something, they can just go and travel around the world and kill people. And if they could

convince the population that such a thing has a possibility of coming into existence and attacking us all, that would bring people out of fear to their knees. Yes. And that's exactly what they're setting up here. And we can see how it is actually brilliant. If we take a step back from getting involved in it,

we'll just look at the brilliance here. They started out creating something that many people quickly realized had a lot of false information in it. So people gravitate automatically to what seems the logical opposite. You see, okay, well, it wasn't coming from a bat, it came from a lab. Now people are emotionally and almost religiously committed to this idea that it came from a lab,

which ascribes power to these biologists that I showed in the video from Rand Paul, where he's talking to Dr. Fauci, saying, as a matter of fact, that the gain of research, gain of function research, could cause a virus that could threaten civilization. I'm worrying about a 50% kill rate. That's 100% anything prior to the end. I agree, absolutely. We're starting to get this problem again. Let's switch over to Zoom one more time, and let's see if we can't get this better on Zoom i'm gonna have uh my son give you

a call back and we'll try this one more time uh i agree go ahead and make the connection there um what he is saying is absolutely true and i'll just say while we're re-establishing the connection that was my concern from the very beginning when i was at info wars i was the first one there to point out hey you know they're giving us this hokey story about uh a bat and wet market and all this kind of stuff. I said, you notice that the only biosafety level four lab is right there. And so I said, maybe we should be cautious about this. But when we look at what China is doing and we've got the people who are falling down in the streets, I said, I don't believe anything that's coming out of China.

But I said, even if this was something that they created in a lab and that they deliberately released as a bioweapon, the worst thing we could do would be to follow this lockdown procedure to do what China is doing and what they're still doing now with their zero COVID stuff. I said that's going to be the absolute worst thing that we could do, because even if this is some real plague and we can't know that that's the case yet, that would cripple us to be able to respond to that. And yet what we had was a fight at Infowars between Mike Adams and me and Alex over their pushing of this fear,

pushing of the gain of function. And I understand this is dangerous. We don't need to be doing this. But one of the things that I have a problem with when you see Rand Paul and others do it, they don't call for the abolishment. You know, these people who are making a big issue out of gain of function, they don't call for it to be abolished. They say, well, we got to do it with some oversight. We got to do it carefully and that type of thing. To me, that's a smoking gun

because if you're going to use this simply to create fear, if you're going to use it simply for partisan purposes to try to come after Fauci, and if you're going to say, well, we should continue to do this anyway, then you're not really serious about it, and you've got another agenda that is there. So that is what I think is really, that's my concern. That's what Rabbi Smith's concern is as well. When we look at how this is being used to create fear, as he was saying, you're ascribing power to these people and giving them godlike powers at the same time you are trembling in fear before them. And then we have the people who are supposedly on our side, supposedly warning us about this, but not calling for it to be categorically stopped. I said also, when we had all this stuff, if you remember, the way that we had the reaction by Clay Jenkins, who is the judge up in Dallas. And again, the county judge is the

highest elected official in Texas. And so Clay Jenkins, when Ebola came to town, they made it all about loving illegal immigrants and that type of thing. They had a guy who came in, he died from Ebola. And two nurses who treated him got very seriously ill, but they did not die. But they made a big grandstand out of it. They called in Fauci. They called in Francis Collins. And Clay Jenkins was telling everybody, don't worry about it. Just go to your football.

We got a football game coming up between the Cowboys and the Houston team. Just go to that. We got so many doctors and nurses and hospitals. You'll be fine. Don't worry about Ebola. And we were being told that Ebola had a case fatality rate that was 40 to 80%. Some of the people would say it was that high. We don't know, but it was a horrific way to die. And it was a very serious disease. And yet they were dismissing that. I said, now look at what happens when COVID comes to town. You got the same politician, Clay Jenkins, and he comes after this lady who's got a,

I forget whether it's a beauty shop or nail salon, something like that. A single mom with her own business shut it down. And because she kept that business going, he came after her for thousands of dollars of fines, and they tried to put her in jail at the same time. I said, how can you justify that? They haven't established a case fatality rate that's anywhere close to Ebola with this stuff. And yet it shows to me that the agenda was completely political.

All right, Rabbi Smith is back on the line. We've changed over to a different provider. Let's see if we can make this work again. Thank you for coming back. Sorry about all the problems. How's the sound? Sounds good right now. That's good. Okay. So I didn't hear everything you're saying, but I just, I want to, to go back and, and reanalyze our framework reference because in the last sentence I heard you saying was you're comparing this to, it doesn't reach the level of ebola ebola is a similar setup each one of these diseases that they're claiming for the last decades is something where they have manipulated the data they have created a fear-mongering in order to get us lay the foundation for us to believe in the idea of saving ourselves through

locking ourselves down. Yes. Except that when Ebola came, they had prepared the groundwork for that. And yet when it came, they didn't do anything. They told everybody, don't fear, right? But then when this came to town, they told everybody, oh, and they hadn't made a case at that point in time to say that this is something that is, you know, they had pictures of people getting sick in Africa and all the rest of the stuff, but they hadn't done any of that footwork.

And yet they still tried to use COVID in a way that they had never done with any other disease. It was really unique what they did, but it really does go back, as you point out, to this idea that, you know, we have to cower in fear before these things and lock everything down that was what was truly different about this time Well, this the foundation and the groundwork has been laid for decades it's they Put the foot on the accelerator and put the foot on the brake in terms of how far they push based on The framework that they've set up behind the scenes in terms of the influence on the media, the influence on the religious leaders, the influence on the politicians. So let's say 20 years ago or 40 years ago, they didn't have that to that degree.

Now they have laid the framework that every religious community, the religious leaders are listening to doctors that tell them what to think and make religious decisions based on what those doctors say. That's something that only developed over the last decade. So couldn't do what pull it off it's not that they didn't try it's not they didn't want to swine flu and other things that hiv they wanted to do that but when the at some points the skepticism sets in people start ignoring it so they have to come up with a new one but by the way in certain segments of the population, HIV is a quote unquote daily threat. They are pushing pharmaceuticals on certain populations in the United States of America that they claim are at high risk for HIV, and they're getting them drugged up every day with anti-HIV drugs.

So you and I are not really aware of that because it's not in our circles of where we spend our time. However, they've locked down that population with a mentality of disease, um, of, of this, uh, of the virus and taking pharmaceuticals to solve it.

And monkey pox now, same thing, monkey pox. They want to do with monkey pox. Right. So they keep throwing out these different things to test, which is going to gain the most traction. Where can they get the best numbers from? and that's why i believe that the the idea of a lab created virus is so super um

uh what's the word it's it's has such super potential to really throw people off track because you see the commitment to it now people People are really believing this, and they're like, well, these evil people are creating these things in these labs. They don't even understand whether any of it's true. It's based on released secret documents from the Chinese Communist Party and alleged whistleblowers, which are all working for the Chinese communists. So they're playing with our minds. And every picture that comes out of wuhan of a person falling in the

street is in the chinese communist party and the pictures of them locking people and sealing them into their apartments is also from the chinese communist party so what are they trying to accomplish in our minds so there's two things one is they want us to learn to emulate their type of lockdown as the only solution because they want us to accept tyranny and public health is the ideal way to accept tyranny yes but they also want us to believe that these labs have superpowers these biologists are sitting there like some mad scientist and they're figuring out how to tweak things to make these super bugs and it's all a lie and even what even what they said in boston by the way just you brought up the boston story if you look at it carefully you'll see that the what they say is that their kill rate of the quote-unquote normal virus was 100 kill rate the um the another version was a zero percent kill rate and they developed one they took the

100 one and they modified it to make it eight only quote unquote only 80 but what people don't realize is that the mice that are being targeted for these experiments are what they call highly susceptible now highly susceptible is a code word for a severely diseased highly or disease susceptible highly weakened most yes it has no real life application whatsoever so first of all they were actually claiming to downgrade the fatality rate or the death rate of this virus number one but number two is it's a lab experiment

that has no application to real life but what happens is some of the names that you mentioned before take this information and they spin it out into the american population don't you see how the boston lab is creating an 80 kill rate virus but that's not true and it has even if it was true in that particular experiment it has nothing to do

with you and me or the rest of the american population because we are not uh specially bred mice to have basically no immune system yes so they are they are twisting our minds and and people on this side of the ocean are are playing up lighting the flames getting people every day's things that come out of these new services is meant to light people inflame them get them terrorized afraid of the latest shadows the latest things and it's part of the psychological warfare against this. Yeah, everything that they're doing, as a matter of fact, I was talking about it earlier this week,

and I had a doctor come on to talk about this RSV thing, right? I'm hearing constant ads now about RSV, and the people who are paying for the ads are GlaxoSmithKline. So I know that after they build the fear, they're going to come in and say, well, now we've got this RSV epidemic and we've got a vaccine, but you just need to rush it out there so we can push it out to people without any testing and make a lot of money.

They're doing this with everything that's out there. You look at the way that they manipulate the terms, manipulate the language, the way they've redefined what a vaccine is, the way they've redefined what a vaccine is, the way they've redefined. Now they talk about variant this and variant that. And everything that they do is designed to create a panic about everything, whether it's RSV or monkeypox or the flu or whatever. Everything now is hyper-weaponized, and it can only be addressed, interestingly enough, by an untested vaccine. That seems to be always the solution, and then to lock us down, as you pointed out.

Look at what is happening in China now. Isn't that amazing that they're still doing this, locking down entire factories, amusement parks, casinos, cities over a single test that comes back positive? And the last time I talked to you, you were talking about how it was always going to be the test that was going to be their key to controlling the population because, you know, they're going to be able to lock down people that when there's no deaths, there's no sickness and nobody feels any symptoms, but yeah, we got a positive test here. So let's lock

everybody down. Right. And, and by the way, we can't believe anything that they're saying is happening in China, even the lockdowns, because we don't have any independent sources of information. They can close down a factory and tell us it's locked down. They can close down an amusement park. It's all the information. raining outside, it's false, even if it really is raining, because he told you it's raining in order to get you to do something that's to your disadvantage. So that's what we have to look at. Anything that comes out of China, we can't we cannot say, oh, in China, they're doing such and such. They want us to believe in China that they're doing such and such in China. You know, to your point about the RSV, it's very interesting. I had an experience when i was university california berkeley uh there was a museum on the mountains there and i i noticed

one the uh time i was walking by and um doing a display on dinosaurs and everything that all the newspaper headlines were about displays and dinosaurs dinosaur at this museum all the museums were doing this whole series of dinosaur stuff that's how do all the museums one year decide to do dinosaurs well lo and behold they announced the premiere of jurassic park is coming up a few months after all the kids have been primed with an excitement for dinosaurs so this is going back decades that they had the ability to get the museums promote dinosaurs so the kids would go to be interested in the movie and that is how the priming of the population goes yeah it's interesting you know because this trusted messenger thing uh in different communities especially religious communities was a big part

of their plans and and they had already done i talked about it in the summer of 2020 i said you know they haven't done any testing and they don't plan on doing any testing of this vaccine for safety or efficacy. And I said, you know, look at what they've really done a lot of testing of, and that is the behavioral psychology and how they can manipulate people. They had a Yale study that NIH was involved in, and they had about nine different arguments that they had been testing on people so they had a control group just like if they were going to give somebody a drug or something they had a control group that didn't get those arguments and they had another group that would get a particular argument and they would evaluate the efficacy of these arguments but they wouldn't

to gaslight people but they wouldn't test the efficacy or the safety of their products well that shows you that's really about psychological warfare yeah oh yeah yeah has been all along and we we had we had that situation here and where i live um they created a task force in march 2020 and there was someone pointed out that there was an article in a jewish newspaper where um that one of the doctors interviewed said yeah i spoke to this such and such an infectious disease researcher at such and such a university at montefiore and we decided that this would be a great test experiment because they had the community under

such a rapture of of listening to whatever they're told to do they were going to experiment how far they could take us and fortunately thank god i was able to write a letter that kind of pierced through all that uh in september 2020 and that brought an end to that. But this idea of experimenting with the population is an ongoing – they are experimenting all the time. And one of the leading – this Republican – what do you call him? This Republican media specialist who's close to the fellow from California. He shares an apartment with a guy from California who is the majority leader in California. Majority leader in the House. What's his name?

Kevin McCarthy. He shares an apartment flat with a guy who came up with the name Climate Change. He's been a big formulator of Republican statements and so forth. He does a lot of surveys

and testing of ideas and stuff i can't remember his name right now but it turns out when i was exploring the cdc website and exploring all the um foundations that are working with the cdc foundation and doing this messaging they had hired that republican aligned um think tank public opinion company the marketing company to do this testing and then develop the marketing ideas and how to sell it to the doctors to sell to the patients and so forth so no wonder the most of the republican party is completely going on board with this because it's right built in to the entire structure in washington is this guy i think his first name is frank and i you'll remember what his name is oh uh uh frank uh lunch the frank lunch yeah yes i think so yes oh yeah yeah i used to do all that stuff for fox news if it's frank lunch he used to he used to run

have these focus groups i watched debates and he would like hook them up to uh some kind of a lie detector thing so he could test their uh you know whether they're sweating or with the skin conductivity or something like that or their pulse and he said look at this you know when when they said this look at how the reactions came from this group in that group it was total hokiness but it he's a main force behind uh being funded by these foundations to to figure out the psychological analysis of the population to get them to buy this genetic code injection and to take it yeah so and no wonder they there's no and he's he's intertwined with republican leadership the minority leader is uh sleeping in his apartment so the the fact is that strange bedfellows politics makes right we see why no one's

really willing to challenge us on any level, you know? So that's the trusted influencers that we have that's behind the scenes. And then we know the local rabbi, the local priest, the local politician, a local doctor who's being fed a whole line of disinformation. Well, and that's why I tell people, look, you know, right now you've got the Atlantic coming out there and say, well, you know, we need amnesty and all the rest of this stuff. You know, some mistakes were made, but it was complicated. I said, look, don't fall for the idea that this is over.

It's not over. At the very least, what you could say is we're in the eye of a storm, eye of the hurricane, and then the backlash is about to hit us with all this stuff. They've left everything in place. And all these Republicans, as you're pointing out, you know, if they're crafting the terms to manipulate us like climate change, instead of being specific about global warming or global cooling, well, you can disprove that. But of course, climate is always changing. You know, we got seasons that are happening all the time. So how could you deny that climate is changing? And so they come up with these very clever ideas, but clearly they are being controlled and manipulated by the party. Nobody wants to criticize the GCI, and it's not just because it was Trump's baby and he's so proud of it. They don't want to criticize it because that's where their bread is buttered.

It's where Fox News makes its money, ponying up to the pharmaceutical companies. And you notice, as they're running with all this stuff, you mentioned Kevin McCarthy. He tried to craft together some program, kind of like what Newt Gingrich did. Newt Gingrich came up with a contract with America, and he had like 10 things we're going to do if we get power. So he tried to nationalize the election by coming up with these different talking points. But nothing in there addressed stopping the legal immunity that the vaccine companies have to harm people. Nothing addressed, prohibiting ever again in the future anybody trying to attempt to impose a vaccine mandate on individuals. They don't address any of this stuff, and they won't stop the vaccine. They completely ignore all of those issues as if the last two years never happened.

Well, that's what they want us to ignore, and they want us to go on as if life is normal. They don't want us to pay attention to the complete restructuring of healthcare in America that's occurred under this. The prioritization of that health resources are more important than individual lives. The whole idea that people that are at risk are a greater burden in society. These are all Nazi terminologies from the 1920s and yes i'm a republic they've completely rechanged that concept it brought out the nazi concept of essential non-essential uh eligible not eligible um for treatment this is the real change that's happened and it's a tremendous advancement in this war against the united

states of america and against the everywhere. And they really have moved the Overton window. You know, there's a lot of us who are really hopping mad. Anybody talks about amnesty, we say, no, no, we have to have justice. We've got to have reform. We've got to have restitution. But, you know, for the other people that are out there, they have moved the Overton window by miles in order to get them to accept all the things you just listed. Correct. And people are not even aware of all the things you just listed. Correct. And people are not even aware of what's been changed for them.

Yeah. So our job is really to really, we have to go back to the first principles. Like I said, we have to realize that, you know, we've talked about liberty in this, in the context of this call and speaking together, but really the United States war of independence was a, an inspiration of religious conviction. And people felt a connection to God, and therefore they weren't afraid. And the real problem is not the Marxists. The problem is each one of us, that we are afraid.

We want to be taken care of. We want to, we've allowed, you know, I look and now people are protesting certain types of education, the doctrines for kids, let's say in Florida. Oh, they're going to block it for kids under 11 years old. Hold on a second here. Why are you allowing your kids over 11 years old to be exposed to this stuff? But no one talks about that. That's right. They're still minors until they graduate, and in many cases, even well past graduation.

And what are your kids that you're paying for college at 20 years old when they're no longer minor being exposed to in college that's right and yet no one's focusing on that they're talking about the little kids but they've ceded the ground to the those that want to destroy and demoralize the human beings in this great country they've ceded ground to them and even they give credit to the governor of florida but he's only talking about the the issue that everyone's willing to talk about he's not exposing what's going on elsewhere on the other age levels and that's the problem we're each one of us is the problem and what we need to do is we need to remoralize ourselves we need to get back to a place where we're not afraid not because we are so strong but because we know god's with us and therefore it doesn't matter if they come up with an idea.

Is there a 100% fatality virus that has just been intentionally released from some lab somewhere and you better lock yourself in the house? I don't care what they have to say. I'm not interested in their data. I'm not interested in what their scientists have to say. I actually believe, and I'm suggesting, that among the group of doctors that have become very prominent today, speaking against the world health organization line and against the cdc and so forth some of those are in place so that when one of these new viruses comes out they're going to say oh my gosh

now this is really serious i agree and and where everyone's what everyone's done is they've replaced their some people have decoupled themselves from, let's say, Dr. F at the National Institutes of Health. But now they've recoupled them with a new guru who will do whatever he has to say. That's right. That's right. And that has always been a tactic. And, you know, we've seen this done over and over and over again. And it's one of the things that made me so mad.

People who knew better, people who are talking about, they're going to run this through with FEMA and they're going to have FEMA camps and they're going to force people to go into these FEMA camps. It'll be some kind of a health emergency. People who had talked about the vaccine, people who had seen how they rehearsed this for 20 years from dark winter on. And they were the ones who were pushing the panic like you were talking about with the gain of function stuff.

That's all they wanted to talk about. Well, we better lock down. We better wear the mask because we don't want to get the vaccine the vaccine is going to be really bad but then when the vaccine comes out and it's trump it's like well you know it would have been worse if it was gates it's just absolutely amazing but they put people in place like that who appear to be opposition but they're controlled opposition that's one of the oldest tactics in the book, and I agree with you. I think there's a lot of people now that are coming in. Some of them came in late because I think they were focused on medicine and their particular field, and because this was a political, psychological thing, they didn't see it was happening because they didn't know the history of this. You see some

of the people like Steve Kirsch, who took the vaccine and then started saying things like, you know, it would be better if we did this and that. And then they tell them, shut up. At that point, they start to realize, oh, wait a minute, there's something else going on here besides medicine and science. And then they realize that it is a political, psychological agenda. But I think you're right. There's a lot of people that they're going to use to push this panic in the next stage. And you have to realize, you know, we make fun of the groupthink of the mainstream people. But we who think independently also have our groupthink.

After we've broken ourselves from the mainstream and we've found people that think like us, we get into a groupthink with them. And we're afraid, each one of us is afraid to say something that's going to mean, oh, you don't interview me anymore because now I'm not following the alternative party line. I got to follow the party line, the alternative party line. And I noticed that when I did not jump on the bandwagon on some of these issues, and now I'm speaking out against the gain of function idea, you know, they don't invite me to conferences or things to speak at because I would be contradicting the the whole thrust of these counter um counter

mainstream um messaging by saying there's nothing to be afraid of here on any side i agree yeah absolutely it becomes you know i've talked about it many times you know everybody's familiar with the milgram experiment you know we had an authority figure saying you know turn up the the electrical shock even to fatal levels as this person gives the wrong answer. But a lot of people, less famous is the Ash experiment where you had one person in a group and the group was in on the gag and they would show them obvious wrong answers and tell them to, you know, like three lines, which one is the shortest? I mean, there's no question about that

but they would gradually about two-thirds of the people just like with milgram experiment about two-thirds of the people would go along with the crowd because even though they knew what the right answer was the the peer pressure was very important and of course that's a big part of what social media is all about and how they can manipulate us with bots on social media. It's because we're susceptible to that peer pressure just like we're susceptible to authority figures above us telling us what to do, what to think. And it's amazing, it's a brilliant point you're making, it's amazing to see the level of gullibility in people.

I mean you have people believing that these genetic code injections have little pieces of self-reassembling metal that become like robots that with communication i mean it's based on like fuzzy pictures that we don't know what their pictures of they just make stuff up and people buy it and they run around hysterical people believe that they're in danger from people who have received the genetic code injection people every whatever it is whatever could make people afraid and keep them apart from each other that's what people are willing to buy and we have to press back and say you know what no we got to connect with other people we need to say nothing will stop me from coming to speak to you in person

nothing will stop me from coming to visit the sick nothing will stop me from making a wedding with my family and friends nothing will stop me from making a wedding with my family and friends. Nothing will stop me from burying the dead properly. Nothing is going to stop me from coming together to pray. Nothing will stop me from coming together for a family barbecue. Nothing will stop me from the whole gamut of what human life is about and the way God created us. We will, nothing will stop us from doing that. And that's how we break through. We have to be irrational. You know, there's, some people's how we break through. We have to be irrational. You know, there's, some people are sub-rational. We have to be super irrational.

We have to say, I don't care about your logic. I don't care about your data. I just know how I'm going to live my life. And that's what makes the change in the world. That's right. Yeah, always in the past, you know, we've had religious leaders who are not concerned about the fact that they might die, but they would still go out and help people who are sick. That's what doctors and nurses would do. They would have to, in order to help people who are sick with a contagious disease, they would

have to risk their life. But you've always had that type of situation. You've never had a situation where you had churches closing down during the Black Plague or something in Europe. They didn't close down over any of that stuff. And that was one of the major things that really stuck out at the very beginning of all of this. And a key part of it is the fact that in a recent study, just had the Barna Group asked a lot of people, religious and otherwise, asked them, you know, what do you look at for authority? And most of them are looking to the government to give them an answer as to what is right and what is wrong. And that's really where we are right now.

We've made a religion, a secular religion, out of the government. I think that is really coming at us through the schools more than anything else. And they have their religious rights and their taboos and their you've got to do this and you can't do that type of thing. And that is really being inculcated at a very early age in the schools. And that's what that is, I think, fundamentally about. And let me ask you about this. You're not in New York, are you?

You're in New Jersey. I'm in New Jersey. But now in New York, I just had a report earlier where there was there were several yeshivas that were supporting Zeldin, even though they were still supporting Democrat candidates like Chuck Schumer stuff. They were against Hochul because the state of New York is now going to after imposing vaccines against people's will and for their kids to go to school. Now they want to set a secular standard whether these people agree with it or not. And, of course, we can kind of guess that it's going to be the Sodom and Marxist, you know, the CRT stuff and the LGBT stuff is probably what they're going to try to impose in these organizations.

And so that is the line for these people. And they're saying, all right, that's it. You know, we're going to support the other guy if they're saying, all right, that's it. We're going to support the other guy if they're going to try to impose that on us. But that really is how they fundamentally control us from generation to generation. That's why we're seeing the generational shift, isn't it?

Absolutely. And I started, since we last spoke, a Substack, actually, as I know that you did too, rabbismith.substack.com. And I actually have an article there on this very subject called The War Against Chinuch. Chinuch is dedicating children and ourselves into the service of God Almighty. You know, it's rough. People talk about education, but it's not about information. It's about training us to serve God. And I have a Substack article on that. In addition to the other topics we just discussed about China and using it with the Wall Street Journal and the lab work and so forth that we discussed.

But in that article, one of the things I'm pointing out, and I think it goes to your point over here, is that they are the way to change the generation. They do not have to fight us. I'll give you an example. One of the people right now who's pushing this whole, unfortunately, pushing this whole gain-of-function research lab idea is this guy named Stephen Mosier, who's done a lot of important stuff about China and so forth in the past and talking about population control and the one-two child policy in China. But look at this for a second. Over the last 30, 40 years, we've known about the one-two child policy in China. Look at this for a second. Over the last 30, 40 years, we've known about the one-two child policy in China, decried it. It's terrible.

But look how in America, people have voluntarily adopted a one-two child policy. Most families in America have zero, one or two children. There's no force. There's no compulsion. And the people are doing it voluntarily. How did that happen because the indoctrination in the schools to teach them about maltais to teach them about all kinds of the world has doesn't have enough resources you don't need so many kids the kids were only then because you needed help on the farm all these lies it affected people so they

voluntarily have as many kids or fewer than they have in China. Yes. So the same thing is with education. I'll tell you a story what happened in Russia after the communist revolution. When the communists came in, they came to the yeshivas. They were known to be atheists, the communists, and anti-religion, but they came to the rabbis and they said, and also to the Islamic leaders, and Islam is very big in certain parts of Russia, and the Russian Orthodox Churchic leaders and the islam is very big in certain parts of russia and uh and the roman catholic the um russian orthodox church leaders and they said okay you could keep all your religious schools however we want there's going to be secular studies with government instructors

in the afternoon so the rabbi said tom said the rabbis have been fighting any form of secular studies in the yeshivas for 100 years before that and didn't allow even a single bit but they said listen this is not directed against the jews they're making the the christians and the muslims do it so it's it's okay so what happened is they got to keep the yeshivas in the morning that's wonderful the kids had then secular teachers in the afternoon within two years all the synagogues were closed yeah why were the synagogues closed the government didn't say you had to close the synagogues the children who had the secular education in the afternoon came back and told their parents how could you be against the state by having a synagogue how could you practice this judy judaism which is as against

the state and against the people and against the revolution so they managed to twist the kids without ever having to fight they had to fight later on and try to eliminate those the holdouts but the mastered massive amount of the majority of the jewish population was assimilated and gave up their jewish practice practices and jewish practices just by virtue of their own children having been captured with the parents' consent and the rabbi's consent into the cult of scarcity and the cult of Marxism. So that's what's happening in America. And that's why they're going against the last holdouts here, which are the yeshivas that have not adopted any secular studies. We didn't get the message to control how many kids we had. We didn't get the message to control how many kids we had.

We didn't get the message to believe everything the government says. So they want to make sure that they can now take over the next generations and bring about conformity with their agenda. That's right. Yeah, we have a common culture. It's become a global culture. That's why it's become so effective, because it is the schools. It is the media.

It's the news. It's the entertainment. it's the entertainment, it's the social media. All of these things are arrayed at the kids and are pushing a different worldview that pushes them away from their culture, from their family, from their religion. And that is happening universally. And that is happening throughout. That's why you typically see all of the, I think assimilation is a good word for everybody,

except for some of the Jewish communities, the Amish communities, and people like that that have managed to keep a sense of community. And that's why if we allow them to atomize us, if we allow them to take our, if we surrender our children for them to educate and to instill a culture in. This is why this is all happening so rapidly, because we've been doing this for several generations in this country. So that's why people are, wow, look at how rapidly this is deteriorating.

And that is exactly what is happening. We're seeing it in the Christian churches. It's like, you know, the people identify as Christian is just plummeting straight down, and it's all because of those influences. Right, and our grandparents and great-grandparents allowed us to be sent to these type of schools, and then we adopted what was the front line of that thinking at the time, and now it's moving to the next level, and we're like, reactionary. That's why the communists talk about us being the reactionaries, because we don't understand what's happening we react when it gets uncomfortable we don't like the new frontier yeah and they laugh at us because we don't have a plan we just react

um and and the reaction is kind of absurd in a certain way because look people are petitions against netflix petitions against disney why in the world you're threatening to cancel your your um subscription to netflix and dis? Why in the world do you have that in the first place? How could anyone watch Netflix or Amazon or Disney or Apple produce things? What in the world are you doing in the first place? So people have become so assimilated, like you're saying, to the mindset of Marxism that they already made it part of their lifestyle. They just don't like the leading edge

and therefore they have a reactionary response we need to tell people and i tell people get rid of your television i mean right now you should just clear your head yeah oh yeah and also unsubscribe from all those people you mentioned before those those news broadcasts and the people that are throwing out all this inflammatory stuff from the so-called conservative side just to scare us delete that stuff just unsubscribe if you sat in your living room and just stayed thinking let your mind wander or sat in the front uh yard and watched the leaves change color you would have much much greater um positive experience in life and much greater ability to stay on course and keep your liberty than if you read any of this stuff you were talking about how um you know people are reactionary and

and it's because we don't understand where they're headed and and so we just react to it we don't understand it but you know there was an interesting quote that i came across um going back to the early 1800s when they were talking about the Conservative Party in the UK and one person really hit the nail on the head I said I've got to remember that that really describes conservatism the guy says we've now been convinced by time not by truth because that's really what happens with the concern on the other side of it they gradually you know they they're not convinced of the truth of an issue,

but then they're drug along with this or the left stays in power long enough that they provide kind of a ratchet effect for it. So after it's been in place for a certain amount of time, regardless of whether it was true or false, they now accept it because it's been there for a certain amount of time. Correct. Correct. And that's the problem with us as that, you know, we have the Marxists who are marching forward and they got this progressive agenda. They know exactly where they're going. We don't know where we're going, but if they do something to us and they leave it there for long enough time, then even if it is totally false, we accept it. And that's my concern about all these executive orders that were put in there, the basis of all these presumed authorities to lock us down

and do all this stuff to us. They're putting it on pause now because they know that we'll be drawn in by the amount of time that's been in place, not by the truth of the issue. It's such an important point, and to emphasize that, how many people speak about undoing the first wave of Marxism, which was the New Deal? How many people speak about undoing the first wave of marxism which was the new deal yeah how many people speak about undoing the second waves and third waves of all the different social um control laws and so forth that came into uh place in the 1960s 1970s 1980s the war on drugs all the ways in which the government hasn't is is built up and brought into our day-to-day lives

and has the right to seize our property and so forth, people don't even speak about that. And it's interesting, my daughter said something just on this point about how we have to, each one of us individually change, get back to our first principles. My daughter was taking a government, the American politics of government course and we were discussing um that if someone actually stood up and honestly said the truth on every issue and what the policy of the united states of america should be on every issue you don't know how many votes he would get i know because i ran for office right so he would get one vote because as soon as right wherever the candidate votes up because

as soon as he gets up and says no more farmer subsidies he lost all the farmers no more educational subsidies and guaranteed loans he lost everyone there no more this no more this we're going back to just what a government's supposed to be no one would vote for him because everyone and we also

have to check ourselves to make sure we're not falling into this in a way in our subtle ways ourselves we all like the idea of free we all like the idea of being taken care of and we don't want to give up the comforts and we don't want to face the backlash and we don't want to be accused of being anti this and anti that yeah so it requires a tremendous spiritual backbone and a spiritual compass we need to know the spiritual direction for ourselves and what's best for everybody and open their eyes to it and the backbone to continue to do that yes regardless of people's response and then that way we'll we'll be able to bring out the divine image in every

person that they themselves will wake up to see what they're really capable of in a positive way and they will then be sparked with hope. And that's why they cannot tolerate that. And so we're going to see more and more attacks on religious freedom, freedom of speech, and all that type of thing. Because if you have a religious point of view, as I've said before, that kind of gives you a focal point, an Archimedean lever that is placed in eternity. And it's amazing the leverage that that gives you over life here and now.

And they don't want you to have that frame of reference. They don't want you to have that focal point that's outside of life. Well, we had some problems at the beginning, and I apologize for that. So we switched over to Zoom. One of the reasons that we use the other platform was because Zoom gives us only about 30 minutes. So we've only got about a minute or so. Tell people where they can find you and on Substack and other places like that.

Great, sure. So rabbismith, S-M-I-T-H,.substack.com, and also rabbismith.org. Happy to meet you all there. I've met many nice people that you, Mr. Knight, have met through this program and also through your Substack and good people. And I just want to bless you and your family to continue what you're doing it's it takes a tremendous amount of courage the first step in the

first statement in the code of Jewish law is to put the Lord before us always and to not be afraid of those that are gonna mock us in doing what's right and I think that you really exemplify that it's it's not it's not about we have to say everything that's you know we do our best to be right on everything. But the main thing is we have to speak to what we believe God is directing us to speak and not be afraid of anybody. And I think that you're doing that and your family is doing that. And God bless you. Well, thank you very much.

And I appreciate what you're doing. We have to understand where they are taking us. And you do a great job of pointing that out. Thank you very much. Uh, rabbi David Smith. And again, you, you can find him at, uh,

uh, is it.com or.org that you had it? The rabbi smith.org and the rabbi smith.substack.com. Okay, great. Great. Thank you very much. We'll take a quick break folks.

And we'll be back in just a second here. I've got a few things that I want to finish up with before we run out of time. We've got about another 10 minutes or so. Uh, so stay with us. We will be, whoops, we'll be right back as soon as I can find the mainstream propaganda. It the david knight show all right and uh i wanted to cover a little bit of headline news i i thought this was hilarious i saw this headline biden dresses up as an old president for halloween he's got a jacket he's got a cap that's got the presidential seal on it but you you know, I mean, it's gotta be his favorite, uh, favorite time because he gets to, um, uh, go out

and, uh, you know, pretend that he's a president and give away free stuff. And, uh, you know, one of the things that he's been giving away, of course, our student loans. And it's pretty amazing. They, they did a study on one, and they asked a lot of people. They said, well, what are you going to do with the money? Most of them didn't feel under any pressure, any financial pressure. They were going to take the money, and they were going to use it for vacations. They were going to use it to buy stuff. They were going to use it just for entertainment purposes.

And, of course, his pretended authority uh with his masquerade and all the rest of stuff is the executive orders the ability to operate as a dictator there are some costumes that they really do support and of course that is the drag queen costumes we got a woman in Ontario, who was arrested while protesting a drag queen event. This time it was being done by a church. The Trinity United Church in Gravenhurst, Ontario, sponsored what they called a family-appropriate drag queen thing. So there were no treats, just tricks involved here evidently and the way they described it they described it as hallow queen and pump king spooktacular outside the church she said

before she was rested she said i'm here to protest grown adults who want to dress in lingerie and dance around children. There is nothing okay about this. And you're doing it in a church. The organizer of the event said, well, this is just nothing but raw hate. But admitted that there were five drag queens dancing in front of children while their parents sat by. While their parents sat by. It was alleged by the police that she was arrested for swearing in public. You see, there's certain rules that you must obey, and there's other ones that you can

easily break. So, lewd behavior in front of kids, that's just fine. But don't swear in public, which she said she did a couple of times under her breath while in the presence of the police. And so they said, we've warned you about swearing in public places. But again, lewd behavior in front of kids, that's just fine. And what I was mentioning earlier, in terms of America being at a moral crossroads, a new study on whether man or God should determine what is right or wrong.

This is a survey from Cultural Research Center, Arizona Christian University. Respondents were asked, regardless of their faith, about America's foundation for determining right and wrong. And they were given three options. The Bible, what you feel in your heart, or what the majority of people want. Majority rule. And I thought that was kind of an interesting way to break that up.

Because two of those are about man determining what is right or wrong. And that's going to be a sliding scale, nothing that's fixed, right? So the Bible, you've got a fixed standard, just like with the Constitution, you've got a fixed standard. But with this other approach, you had 42% of the people said, well, what do I feel in my heart? I'm going to Disney theology, right? Let your conscience be your guide.

Pinocchio. And you had 29% said, well, we'll go with majority rule. 29% said the Bible. But if you stop and think about that, you've got 71%, 7 out of 10 adults, believe that man rather than God should be able to define what right and wrong are. And it's also going to be a sliding standard. One of them is going to be, well, what does the majority think?

We'll put it up to a vote. We'll have a democracy to decide what right and wrong is. The other part of the man's side is we will decide that individually. And so we'll all have our own standards. So that was the majority opinion, 42%. But then there's another 29% that says, you know, we'll do that by a vote. We'll decide what is right and wrong. And so there is a greater understanding of the rights of the individual versus democracy. But when you pit liberty and individual rights against the mob and democracy, that still is going to be insufficient ultimately to define what morality is.

And the founders of this country understood that as well. George Washington and others. George Washington talked a great deal about, well, you got a republic or whatever. Benjamin Franklin said, you got a republic, let's see you keep it. All of the sayings that they had about democracy being two wolves and a sheep, deciding what's going to be for dinner. They understood that part of it. They were skewed towards, well, let's let individual people make decisions for their life. But when we talk about morality, they did not see that they were going to be defining

morality for people. George Washington said that if we don't have a moral country, we're not going to be able to keep this form of government. And that's the problem. We can only take politics so far. We can argue for the moral superiority of people being able to make the decisions about their life, but ultimately we cannot have a standard that is going to be defined by what we personally think. And that is really what is missing today, because ultimately we'll have no standard with that.

60% of Americans believe that there is absolute truth. 40% believe that the individual determines their own version of truth. I have a truth, you've got a truth. That's postmodernism. That's what's gotten us here. That's what's gotten us into this transgender issue. And as we were just talking with Rabbi Smith, generationally, they have won. The numbers are flipped around for those between the ages of 19 and 29.

That's 40, 60 who say that there is absolute truth. 60% say no, there isn't. That postmodernism has won because of the institutional schools. Before we run out of time, I just want to thank those who have left tips. Louis Tart, thank you very much on Rockfin. Mark Daroba, thank you very much. He says, great show. Keep up the fight. Well, thank you very much, Mark. I appreciate that. And we had Harps out of Australia said, here's a better picture of Muck's Halloween costume. Can you pull that up?

And we can see a closer picture. There you go. There's a close-up picture. And you can see right there, the center chest piece, the inverted cross. There's no question that that is the satanic Baphomet head with an inverted satanic cross. So why did he do that? Good question.

Why did he do that? Again, it is confirmation bias. People wanting to believe that there's going to be, that government is going to save them, that some altruistic billionaire is going to save them. That simply isn't going to be the case. Well, we're out of time today.

There was more that I wanted to get to, but, um, we had a little bit of problems with, um, what? Oh, well,

we hit, uh, Karen just came in and said we had seven orders. So thank you very much. All of you who order things. And again, today we do have the, uh,

the coin available. Uh, you're going to be surprised when you see it things and again today. We do have the The coin available You're gonna be surprised when you see it. It doesn't do it justice for the pictures. Thank you very much for your support Have a good day The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,

please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com Thank you.