The David Knight Show - 30Nov23 After Selling Govt Narrative About 9/11 for 22 Years, Tucker Now Sells Govt Narrative About UFO's

Episode Date: November 30, 2023

(3:00) Update on kid with face paint & head dress at Chiefs game labeled as "racist" by sports writer. Turns out the kid is Indian heritage, but it should be pushed as defamation regardless (10:25) Tucker is selling UFO's to the public after mocking Building 7 questions for 22 years and still not telling us what he thinks about B7. Now he's pushing the narrative where the government wants you to take the renamed UAP's seriously. Why?(14:16) Google has a program to determine if pictures are real or synthetic. The Russians just fed pictures from moon landing into it… (19:16) Musk goes to war with corporations. Will he go to war with the governments that made him the world's richest man? His comments about TikTok mind reading and OpenAI are interesting even if hypocritical (27:18) As the global conspiracy to remove meat, especially in the "over-consuming" USA are going to be the centerpiece of COP28, more resistance arises in Congress members from rural America (41:50) Prosecutor given all Twitter accounts where people liked or re-tweeted Trump (46:41) Speaker Johnson is concerned about the precedent that would be set if they threw out a lying Congressman who misappropriated money — George Santos(55:05) San Francisco's GHOST MALL and Target's faux Black Friday(1:05:05) Google, the search engine that hides things, is now hiding crisis pregnancy centers from search results(1:10:55) Kissinger, Former President of the US & Perennial Bilderberger War criminal or Nobel Peace Prize material? Advisor to Nixon or the person truly in charge? (1:28:46) INTERVIEW Will "Election Interest Rates" Kick Off Gold? Will Silver Be the Signal? Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight.gold. Increasingly fragile banks, domestic and international, central banks in massive debt looking to reset the financial system — a very volatile year is coming up (2:00:12) Lions & lambs, leaders & armies — Alexander the Great & Javier Milei (2:16:43) Trump's Lawyers Say He Did NOT Take an Oath to "Support" Constitution What a strange, ludicrous, and losing position to take! Why not challenge the "insurrection" label? (2:35:34) Nikki Haley, the candidate of choice for multinational corporations, WEF, UN, and military industrial complex (2:42:09) "It's a Bumbling Life" — what if Biden had been kicked out of law school for his plagiarism and never gotten into politics? How would it have changed the country (2:52:19) Listener questions whether David Knight is a Christian since he celebrates ChristmasFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor. Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. But MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 30th of November, Year of Our Lord 2023.

Well, today we're going to take a look at some follow-ups to what we talked about a great deal yesterday. The cancel culture, do people really understand what is happening with this? It turns out the kid that was mocked is actually from an Indian descent, but it's about more than that. And we see that even as Elon Musk is pushing back very hard against the censorship, as Rumble is putting out a lawsuit as well against this censorship defamation, how do we proceed with this? And of course, we're going to take a look at Henry Kissinger, who just died at the age of 100. Was he a war criminal or deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize?

We'll be right back. We also have that we'll be talking about today, a very novel defense by Trump's attorneys as they're trying to keep him off the ballot in Colorado, saying that he violated his oath to the Constitution and was responsible for an insurrection. Rather than pushing back on the insurrection, Trump's lawyers take the interesting tact of saying he never took an oath to defend the Constitution, to support the Constitution.

I find that to be very interesting. We'll talk about that. The semantics, whether or not these people know what they're doing. I mean, good luck proving that. Anyway, let's begin with a follow-up. I talked about the little kid who was yesterday who went to Vegas because they've already got people to keep you from wearing an Indian headdress to the Chiefs games in the NFL, Kansas City Chiefs. But it was an away game.

And this kid goes and he's got one half of his face painted black, the other half bright red. I talked about what happened at the high school that I went to. And I said, you know, these people who got really upset about it, these alumni, completely missing the point. It's like they're coming back and trashing their memories or something. They don't really understand the purpose of why this is being done. And yesterday I talked about another jurisdiction. This one was a school, but it's also been done at a city where they told the city employees there will be no Christmas decorations decorations and so forth and now they're doing the same thing with the public schools and this is all coming from uh dei and it's being pushed by marxists and they're doing using the same template everywhere

right uh at a city small city in one area at a school uh school system in another area. So this is something that is being organized. It's not just the idea of one aberrant crank somewhere. So they're trying to shut this stuff down. That's what people don't really understand. It's a look at these small fights here and there. You know, the quote-unquote war on Christmas that they've been talking about a long time. You know, this is again, why is santa always white that type of thing uh that is it's kind of like the

bump stock to the second amendment it's an issue that is not important except in its precedence and so these issues in and of themselves are not really important but they are very important in terms of setting precedents about controlling people's speech, their free exercise of religion, and all these other things. And so when you look at the update to this kid, a lot of people are saying we ought to sue him. This kid ought to sue this deadspan sports writer and his publication. Ought to sue them into oblivion. And I agree, but the rationale that they're using is wrong. What they're saying is it turns out this kid is of Indian descent,

and so he's entitled to wear that. No, no, it's just pure slander. They're accusing him of being racist when he's not racist. And this is essentially what is being done to Elon Musk and to X and to Twitter and to Rumble and every platform that they don't like. The first thing that if they don't like your politics, if you oppose their government narrative, you're racist and all the rest of this stuff. And so rather than saying, he's not racist because he's Indian. You need to take it at the point of defamation. You're

telling lies about this guy, Sue him for defamation. And so that's my concern about that. So, you know, the kid is a Native American. Well, guess what? So am I. Like I said before, Russell Means said, I prefer the term American Indian

because people whose families have been here for centuries, like mine, see themselves as Native america native americans uh so use the term american indian but again they're missing the point just like these people in high school missing the point they don't see the pattern they need to read she van fleet's book mal's america a survivor's warning excellent Excellent interview. If you haven't seen that, uh, that I had with her, uh, she really understands what this is about.

These people don't understand it at all. They look at this and it's like, this is just a bunch of crazy wacko leftist policies. These people are out in left field. No, there's a very definite pattern to this. The pattern, excuse me, the pattern goes back to, uh, communist uh communist dictators mal stalin all of them use the same pattern use exactly the same tactics and techniques and of course they do have some new weapons and that is the censorship of the internet and after i talked a great deal yesterday about the uh the ctil this little justice league of censorship that they've got out there.

You had Whitney Webb say, well, okay, this was put out by Matt Taibbi and Schellenberger, I think it was the guy's name. Anyway, she said, I covered this three years ago, this exact same group, the same cybersecurity group. I covered it in detail. And so this whistleblower that is out there, so it's also been, again, this is three years ago she covered it. But as I said yesterday, it goes way back. It goes way back to the 90s when they started getting actively involved in venture capital.

It goes back even to the 60s when you had a DARPA psychologist, look at how they could manipulate the public. So it goes really far back. It's kind of like event two Oh one, you know, everybody focuses on that and yeah, look, it's a coronavirus and they rehearse this locking everybody down. So, but that was about the 20th time they had done that. Yeah, this is really tied to 9-11. That's what you need to understand.

That dark winter was the first time they did this, and they did that two months before 9-11. And they began rolling out simultaneously with Homeland Security and all the rest of this stuff. They laid out the legal framework to push on to states so they wouldn't have any challenges within the 10th Amendment, right? You know, Biden and Trump and Fauci. I didn't order anybody.

Yeah, that's right. They incentivized it, and they told these local people what to do, and they did it. And they had given themselves the power to do this at the state level going back to December of 2001, two months after 9-11. And they had simulated doing all this stuff two months after 9-11. And they had simulated doing all this stuff two months before 9-11. All of it is tied together. 9-11 and the police security state, surveillance state, as well as this lockdown surveillance state and the IDs,

and it's all tied together. And it goes back to 2001. And I think it's important that we remember that, you know, we now have Tucker Carlson who's coming out. He dropped a report yesterday about UFOs. And yet think about what Tucker Carlson was telling us for the longest time about nine 11, right us for the longest time about 9-11 right for the longest time he would mock anybody who talked about who questioned the official narrative he would not let people

play the video i've got a clip of this right here and then all of a sudden you know that was i've got a clip here in 2005 where a guy comes in to talk about Building 7. He starts mocking him. He goes, can we play the video that I gave you? Well, I can't play that video, says Tucker Carlson. And then 18 years later, he throws out this idea that, you know, wait, you can't even mention Building 7 or you'll get fired. Was that why he didn't play it 18 years earlier? And of course, Tucker Carlson mentions Building 7 and raises his eyebrows like,

oh, I have questions about it. But he doesn't say anything about it. Tucker Carlson is a limited hangout. Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset. Can't you see that now? And just take a look at this clip. Claims. Do you have any of those?

Sure, sure. Let's start with the collapse of Building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you? Okay, I'm not sure if we can, but it's specified. Maybe there's some kind of code. You just don't show the collapse of Building 7. I don't know what it is. They don't care if you think the earth this flat. It's not a threat to anyone but if you say like What what actually happened with building seven like that is weird, right? It doesn't look great Right if you were to say something like that on television

It's flip out. They would flip out. She'd like lose her job over that way Why this is World Trade Center seven just before it collapsed on september the 11th 2001 it had not been hit by an aircraft it had been damaged by falling debris and fire but by 5 20 not much of a fire is it to be extinguished although the building was 47 stories high it doesn't fall sideways, nor collapse unevenly. For this to have happened, all of the building's vertical supports must have given way at almost exactly the same time. Yet the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse was due primarily to fire. But what does it look like to you yeah I don't see a big raging fire do you I've looked at pictures of steel skyscrapers that are

just engulfed in fire and engulfed in fire for over a day and when the fire is finally put out or goes out on its own you You have this twisted leaning steel framework. That's there. Uh, that was a controlled demolition. Uh, Tucker still won't tell you the truth about that, but now he's got some new things that he wants to talk about. You know, he knew that he would lose his job working for MSNBC or for Fox or for the CIA, if he had said that.

But now the CIA wants you to believe that there's UFOs everywhere. Listen to this. Earlier this year, Congress passed something called the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023. The law requires the U.S. government to tell the public what it knows about the countless unidentified flying objects that have been spotted in the skies above Earth over the past 3,000 years. It's designed to very well could be a transformative piece of legislation. And it comes at a time when we can finally say with confidence that the most unlikely sounding theories about UFOs are actually true.

Yes, these things are real. They're not all weather balloons. They're not experimental aircraft from this or any other country. Whatever they are, they are not of human origin, nor do they behave according to the laws of known physics. And yes, the U.S. government currently has physical evidence that they exist. That means wreckage of the craft as well as the bodies of the beings that flew them. Amazingly, all of this is true

all of it is true they don't obey the laws of physics and of course the cia masters don't obey the laws of the government of the constitution either right and they're going to report as to what they have seen for the last 3,000 years. CIA has been on that. Well, actually, the people that the entities that are running the CIA have been around for the last 3,000 years running this stuff. Look, this is I don't know what they're getting ready to pull. I'm just telling you, I'm showing you these clips here because don't trust Tucker Carlson. He's a trust fund kid, a CIA wannabe.

He works for them. He pushes their narratives. If they don't want to talk about building seven, he won't talk about building seven and nine 11. If they want to talk about UFOs, he'll tell you it's real. And they're going to tell you their spin about it. Yeah, the, um, the building actually fell down. That's the one thing we can agree on. But they're going to spend this whole thing the way they want.

And anybody who says anything differently, their surrogates in the press, like Tucker Carlson, will ridicule you. They'll hide the video. They won't play the video. They won't show that to you. They won't let the guy who comes on to talk about it, who is a physicist, a physicist. What is Tucker's degree in political science or something like that? I don't know what he got a degree in if he even got a degree. But they're going to mock people who do this. By the way, there's a lot of mocking that is due for people. We have, for the longest time,

we've had people who've questioned the moon landing, right? And there's been evidence, you know, people saying, look at this, we've got like a, you know, shadow in the direction that should not be a shadow in their pictures and other things like that. Somehow NASA lost the original footage but then they came up with some better enhanced footage and and so forth and um so there's been a lot of questions about that and even one of the guys who was on the front line at mission

control of nasa i came on when i was there at Infowars. He was in Houston. And he said, I'm not sure that we landed. Because there are some things like Apollo 13 that seemed real, but so much of that seemed so fake. And he questioned, he said, why did they destroy, not only destroy all the Saturn V engines, but also all the plans? Why would they do that? And so it looks like a cover-up, he said. This is a guy who is there at mission control the entire time.

And now we've got something else, in addition to the documentaries, in addition to looking at the fake pictures, in addition to talking to the people who are there. Now we have artificial intelligence, right? And they have programs to try to scope out if something is real or not real, right? And here is Putin being shown. The neural network thinks that everything in this picture is fake, they said, showing the moon landing stuff. It believes this is fake, says Putin,

and he's smirking. It looks fake. This is what Google's neural network thinks, not ours. So there will be no bias. Yeah, the neural network has analyzed a lot of data, including light and dark, contrast, etc. And the neural network believes

that this photo is synthetic. Yeah, yeah. dark contrast, et cetera. And the neural network believes that this photo is synthetic. Yeah. Yeah. Join the club. It's eventually truth is going to come out in a big way. Hope they can get back there soon so they can plant the flag that they never planned in the first place. Right.

It's going to be real embarrassing. If somebody beats them to it and they can't find where this thing landed and left all the stuff behind uh so we're gonna take a quick break when we come back we're gonna talk about the censorship uh that is happening the battles that are going on is this something we can trust you know we had a very interesting back and forth yesterday with musk being asked questions and getting very direct and telling the advertisers to go f yourself uh so we're going to talk about that when we come back and we will be right back stay with us if you like the eagles on a dark desert highway the cars and huey lewis in the news The Cars. Let's go. And Huey Lewis and the News. They say the harder rock and roll is to beat.

You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. Sous-titres par LaVacheSquid L'esprit de l'artiste You're listening to the david knight show and i want to mention i should have mentioned in the beginning of the show um we have a listener who wanted to remain anonymous uh who said that he would match funds today uh today is the last day of the month. We're at a little bit over 80%. And so I appreciate that. Thank you very much. And that is on tips on Rockfin and on Rumble. And so thank you very much, Tim. And since you want to remain anonymous, I won't mention his name.

Let's talk a little bit about what is happening with Elon Musk, free speech issues, Rumble. Elon Musk was at a conference yesterday, deal book conference. He was being interviewed by Andrew Ross Sorkin. And he had a lot of frank comments about things, as he always does. He says, I have no problem being hated when he was asked about the advertiser boycotts. And he says, if someone wants to blackmail me with advertising they can go f themselves and then he looks into the audience where bob eiger is of disney and says hi bob he's very much like trump isn't he and and so it is interesting to see how this is developing what

what do you think is really behind this i mean mean, certainly there's ego involved with these guys, these billionaires. A lot of ego is involved. It gets personal. It's now personal with them. And yet he's developing this facade of being an anti-globalist that doesn't really seem to jive with some of the things that he's done. Remember when he bought Twitter? And more than once, he's had meetings with this European bureaucrat,

this Euro-crat, Euro-rat, Theory Breton, who is conspiring to shut down everybody's speech everywhere with their DSA. I call him Conspiracy Theory. But Conspiracy Theory came to him and said, you will shut down who we tell you to shut down. And the kind of speech that we tell you to shut down. Oh, yes, yes, yes. He said, very cringy, very cringy.

And so I have a suspicion that a lot of this anti-globalism, just like with Trump. Hey, I'm a big guy. I'm a rich man. I'm going to do whatever I want. You're not going to boss me around. And I don't like your globalist agenda. I think a lot of that is just phony hubris. I think the behind the scenes are going to do what they want.

He's going to do what the governments want. We've seen this over and over again, whether you're talking about China or you're talking about Europe and their censors over and over again, Musk has been compliant with him. He may bow up to these other corporations and tell them to go F themselves. But he's not going to say that to Xi Jinping. He's not going to say that to the European union either. Uh, when it comes to governments,

that's how Musk has made his money. That's how he became the richest man in the world by doing the bidding of governments, by getting into the areas, identifying the areas that they want to expand into, and then filling that gap for them and doing it in a very subservient way. And from the electric cars to the satellites

to everything else. And so I think that's really what's going on here. Just like Trump, who's Mr. Anti-Globalist, and yet he goes to the World economic forum immediately before the pandemic and nobody questions that in the maga crowd gateway pundit info wars none of these people big trump supporters breitbart none of them question that oh well he was just there making deals with big corporations it's like yeah yeah we know about that the uh crony capitalism that's involved with all that but when governors from virginia and from georgia you know youngkin and kemp when they go to the world economic forum and everybody criticizes those republicans for

doing it they say well i'm just here to do jobs i'm i want to get some companies to come and open up some facilities in my state. And everybody says, I don't believe that. You're a sellout. You're a globalist. But when Trump does it, he's not a sellout to the globalist, even though immediately after that, he locked everybody down and created the shot to poison everybody around the world. All these people doing the same thing. And Trump was the one who was at the epicenter of that, bragged about doing that. He's never held responsible.

So when you look at Musk, I see him playing the same game that Trump does. Yeah, look at me. I'm totally in opposition to these people when in reality, he's going to be feeding them your information so yeah he might bow up to these other companies but he's not going to uh he's not going to fight the government really um so they asked him also about ai and he said well it's more dangerous than nuclear bombs he said i've got mixed feelings about Sam Altman, the OpenAI CEO, that was just kicked out and then reinstated at OpenAI. A lot of speculation about why that was happening.

And Elon Musk said, I have mixed feelings about Sam. The ring of power can corrupt. Okay, so is Elon like Frodo, Frodo and Sam? Uh, and of course the ring of power does corrupt. That's why you can't trust these billionaires. Don't trust these billionaires.

They're not populist. They're not blue collar. They're not on your side. They're on their side. And the ring of power does corrupt. And he knows that very well he said i don't know why they ousted him and i don't know why the chief scientist there felt so strongly that he had to fight sam he said that sounds like a serious thing i don't think it was trivial

and i'm quite concerned that there's some dangerous element of ai that they've discovered then they asked him about tiktok he says, well, I stopped using TikTok when I felt the AI probing my mind. And I felt uncomfortable with that. I thought it was an insult, he said. And well, I'm sorry, the insult was about Biden shunning him at the EV summit. But when he was uncomfortable with the TikTok probing his mind, but not with Neuralink. This is what I'm saying. It's so self-contradictory.

Oh, that TikTok, that AI was probing my mind. But then he wants to literally put a brain in your chip and literally put physical probes, insert them into your brain to control it. It's pretty crazy and when you talk about probing your mind the company that his pal peter teal you know two of them got rich together at paypal and peter teal funded palantir and that's exactly what palantir was. You talk about the power of the ring that he just referred to from Tolkien. Well, the Palantir was a means of communication

that kings used to communicate at distance. But then the dark side took over and started, you know, Sauron took over and started using it to probe people's minds which is exactly what these guys are doing it's not just tick tock they're doing that on twitter and they're doing it with palantir especially with palantir self-consciously actually their logo is actually the the um you know stylized the crystal ball thing that the Palantir was. And they talk about it in the corporate culture,

about the Lord of the Rings. These people will tell you the truth. They just won't tell you how they fit into the truth. So AI and all of this wealth and all of this technological power, yeah, it does corrupt. And are they probing your minds yes they are probing your minds and all of them are all of them all of them are technocrats as i've said many times before elon musk is technocratic royalty his grandfather bought fully into that

and he was um kicked out he was charged of trying to overthrow democracy in Canada. Kicked out. That's why he went to South Africa. Meanwhile, Rumble is suing for defamation. And this is a group that was trying to demonetize them with the ads. The same thing they're doing to Musk. You know, Musk is right to fight this stuff. I'm glad that he's doing it. And there may be some good things to come out of it.

I'm just saying, be careful. Don't trust anybody. Don't trust anybody, especially these billionaires. They're not on your side. They're on their side. And he may be playing a very long game. And part of that game may be gaining your trust. But just as I said at the beginning of the program, defamation is the key. Defamation is what the parents of this kid should sue Deadspin, the sports publication, for mocking him, for calling him a racist. He's not a racist. He doesn't get to get a pass on not being a racist because he's of Indian descent. They flat out lied about him. He was not doing it out of any racist motivation and so there's a group called check my ads and they were trying to demonetize and destroy rumble and we can pretty much assume that they were being pushed by government sources as we saw with a ctil you know the justice league of censorship uh the uh pretense that this is a public-private partnership

and these people are not really doing the government's bidding when the government sets up these organizations, puts its own people in charge of them, even while these people are still working for the government, and then funds them. Oh, no, it's not the government that's doing it. It's just these other people who are activists. And that was a narrative that we heard

for the longest time you know you got these corporations out there and they're censoring people because it's just silicon valley and because there are just all a bunch of left-wing lunatics and they don't like our politics no they were taking orders and all these people are taking orders so i'm glad they're doing that um that lawsuit here's the thing about the lawsuit that's even good, even better, I should say. When Rumble does a lawsuit, that gives them a chance to do discovery. And who knows, they may find that these people that were coming after them, trying to shut them down, I assume, that they're going to find that there are connections

between this organization called Check My Ads and DARPA or CIA or the Pentagon or some of these special forces, these different people that are out there. I talked yesterday about Thomas Massey and his, um, statement about these, uh, self moving and motivating and correcting things that we call cattle, you know, these, uh, protein generation machines and how that's all in perfect, um,

balance and continues and all the rest of the stuff. And why we need to push the prime act so the government doesn't have a centralized control of our meat processing so they can shut it down. And other good news came out. We have a GOP representative who is very concerned. The COP 28 climate summit is coming up in Dubai. I think it's next week. It's coming up in Dubai. I think it's next week. It's coming up right now. And the key thing about that, as I reported earlier in the week,

they were going to focus on a global plan to stop meat consumption. And of course, meat consumption per capita, meat consumption is higher in the U.S. than anywhere else. And so we're going to have to reduce our consumption by 90%, according to this U.N. plan. We are over-consuming meat, and it has to be cut. This is what they're going to be working on in Dubai. I find it interesting that they go to a city that's built in the desert to talk about green issues. Fix your environment first, and then tell us what to do about our environment. Uh, we,

you know, if they start sequestering and sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere, which they've already started doing, they start doing that at a scale, uh, cutting down the trees and burying the trees. And they've been going to turn us into Dubai. If a Gates gets his way,

uh, he'll be, uh, and it'll be not just physically like Dubai, but it'll be like Dubai in the sense that it will be just a few people with a lot of money. Unbelievably wealthy. And everybody else will be living at their mercy in the desert, in the desert. So as this is happening, it's good to see that there's somebody besides um thomas massey i know by the way you know as they want to at the same time that it

came out they said we want to cut meat consumption by 90 i had a study that showed that there was something in and meat um protein that that builds uh immunity builds the immune cells the t cells they called it vaxogenic right it's like a vaccine except it's not like a vaccine the vaccines attack your immune system the trump shots actually kill t cells that's why dr ryan cole said there's going to be a massive increase in cancer and it's going to run rampant in people, the turbo cancer that we're now seeing. Is that because these vaccines are killing the T cells? Well, the so-called vaxogenic ingredient in meat actually builds up the T cells. And so I guess that's another reason why they got to get rid of it, isn't it? But anyway, in the House of Representatives,

the chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, a Republican, Glenn Thompson from Pennsylvania, who is chairman of that House Agriculture Committee, said America's farmers and ranchers are climate heroes, reducing emissions while providing abundant and affordable food, fiber, and fuel. Well, I'm glad that he's taking this on, but he's not taking it on head on. It's what the UN is saying is that they're pushing out with their Office of Climate Change. In the U.S., though, agriculture alone generates about 10% of total greenhouse gas emissions.

The American agricultural sector accounts for 1.4% of global emissions and has implemented a wide range of solutions, said one person at pushing back on this. But these people are accepting the MacGuffin, and they're trying to argue on the terms of these people. Well, look, we're climate heroes. And even though we have 10% of the greenhouse emissions, that's only 1.4% of global emissions. That's not good enough. You have to attack the lie, the central lie,

the central MacGuffin that they're using to scare everybody. And May Thompson attack the lie, the central lie, the central McGuffin that they're using to scare everybody. And may Thompson, the guy who's chair of the agriculture house, agriculture committee, and several other house Republicans slammed Biden climate envoy, John Kerry for singling out food. While giving a speech at the department of agriculture climate summit, a lot of people have no clue said, carry that agriculture contributes about 33% of all the emissions of the world.

See how he changes this. And of course, why not? I mean, we're talking about unicorn farts. You can just make this stuff up. And so you got to take this out. Remember,

we used to have FDR FDR during the depression promise people vote for me and there'll be a chicken in every pot. But now we have a hundred years later or so 90 years later i guess uh we got the democrats of 2023 say vote for us and you'll have only one chicken a month how about that it sounds like a deal you want to support those guys and that's what john doing. So with all of this, you have Ms. Rothschild wants a merger between corporations, governments, and AI to save capitalism. Look, we've gone from just outright corruption where corporations buy influence and get tax deductions and get subsidies and win the contracts and tap into that pot of gold there in Washington.

We've gone from just outright corruption to full-on crony capitalism, like you see with the FDA, just waving aside all regulations, this revolving door going back and forth between the FDA people and the people that they're supposed to represent. But now we're getting ready to go into this corporate technocracy where they ban everything that is a competition where they essentially become the rulers and you have global governance by this technocratic, these technocratic corporations that have so much money. And what they're going to try to do is to make sure that national governments

are neutered in the same way that we saw happen in the United States, where you had separate sovereign states. At the time of the Civil War, people referred to the United States in the plural. And so the United States are. Now, after the Civil War, with all the consolidation and so the united states are now after the civil war with all the consolidation centralization immediately it became the united states is is when they were fighting the battles every state north and south raised their own armies they fought under their own state flags and so that type of consolidation into a centrally controlled nation state, they're now taking it to the next level. And they want to essentially do the same thing to all the different political states, just making them administrative arms of the World Health Organization or the UN, following the World Economic Forum agenda and the UN agenda, financed by these corporations who will then be the stakeholders.

They'll own everything. They'll control everything. They'll ban their competition and criminalize any opposition to them. That is where we're headed. And we're escalating so rapidly that now people like the Rothschilds are out there actually openly talking about it. And the crazy thing is that she's putting this in the context of saving capitalism in the same way that, you know, we must destroy free speech so we can save

democracy and the constitution, right? And we have to destroy the first amendment to save America. Well, they have to create this technocratic merger between corporations and governments and AI in order to save capitalism. They call it the Council for Inclusive Capitalism. And so you're going to understand that it is coming from DEI. The basic root function of the council is to centralize most or all major corporations with global influence. If you don't have global influence, as Trump pointed out in 2020, you're not essential. You don't have any place at the table.

And it's all going to look like what we saw in 2020. We have a centralized agenda that is being pushed out. Who is giving the orders? Is it Klaus Schwab? Is it Fauci? Is it Trump? Who's giving the orders? The global orders? Well, you know, it? Is it Fauci? Is it Trump? Who's giving the orders? The global order as well?

It's a hidden thing. It's a hidden thing. It is kind of stuff at Bilderberg, and they come up with their agenda. And it's just a coincidence that everybody's doing the same thing all at the same time, and that they're doing it iteratively in stages. They're not reacting to an emergency. They're doing, well, in two months, we're going to do this next thing. But if you're on Main Street, you're not reacting to an emergency. They're going, well, in two months, we're going to do this next thing. But if you're on Main Street, you're not essential.

But if you have global influence, if you're a multinational corporation, you are essential. And so they want to get these corporations. They want to join them with governments into a network that places ideology over profits. And it's not really placing ideology. It's just placing power over profits because uh and it's not really placing ideology it's just placing power over profits uh money has always been a means for power for these people now they're just going straight for the power and it's going to be a merger between them listen to the way that um fink at blackrock uh explains it uh when he uh when he talks about, well, let's see. Actually, I can't get back to that deck there.

Travis, you didn't give me a button to get back to that other one. Oh, here it is. Okay. Let's take a look at Think here, if I can find it. There it is. It's my belief that the next 1000 unicorns companies that have a market valuation over a billion dollars won't be a search engine won't be a media company there'll be businesses developing green hydrogen green agriculture green steel green cement

well that eg esg stuff is not working out too well for them as you see in this video green energy meltdown continues next year yep oh they're having to pull back a little bit on that and so now they're going to double down that's what rothschild is doing okay let's let's come at this in a different way but it's still about the dei still esg is still about dei because remember the s is environmental and social governance and when you look at these people these climate idiots they are watermelon environmental. They have a thin veneer of green, but inside they're totally red. And understand that before these idiots in the United States with their red hats and the rest of the stuff, they don't understand what they're doing. And when I talked to Shiva and Fleet, she said, yeah, I hate it. Red has been the color of

communism so thoroughly. I really hated even seeing it anywhere. I couldn't believe seeing conservatives wearing red. Well, they were told to by the mainstream media. You're going to be red now. Oh, okay, we're red. Let's get our red MAGA caps and all the rest of this stuff. No, red has always been the color of communism. And you look at this green agenda.

It's got a thin veneer of environmentalism green on it. And inside it is completely red. Watermelon environmentalists. And these people are after members, always the communist dictators come to power with the help of bankers, and with

the help of politicians that are going to share in that power. Special Counsel Jack Smith has demanded information on all Americans who favored or retweeted Trump tweets while Trump was on Twitter. Uh, this has just come out. Uh, he wants, if anybody liked anything that president Trump tweeted, if you liked or retweeted anything that he put on Twitter, uh, then, uh, Jack Smith wants to know about you. And I guess Nikki Haley will want to know your real name too.

This is why you don't want Nikki Haley getting people's real names. Number one. And this really shows the tyranny of the Biden administration. Heavily redacted search warrant. And this search warrant was resisted for a while by by twitter by elon musk they got fined 350 000 for failing to meet smith's demands by his deadline they ultimately complied with a warrant so did they just drag their feet did they challenge it if they were challenging it legally wouldn't you think that that would buy them some time on this?

I don't know exactly what was going on with it, but ultimately they got the information from them. And I don't see any court challenge that was involved in that. So it also requested a list of every user that Trump followed, everyone that he unfollowed, everybody that he muted, everybody that heollowed, everybody that he muted, everybody that he unmuted, everybody that he blocked, everybody that he unblocked, and also any users who did that to Trump's account. So if he got tired of his ranting and you blocked him, you didn't want to hear it, or you muted him,

well, they want to know that too. So maybe even his opposition is going to show up how's jack smith going to go through this mountain of data well that's where the artificial intelligence type stuff comes in which tells you that these people that we which we know the nsa and these other people they have the processing power to do this kind of stuff and have had it for a long time and um so steve friend the fbi agent whistleblower i've interviewed steve it seemed like a really good guy honest guy who refused to go after people simply because they were there on january the 6th and blew the whistle about what was being done and he said they're

shutting down law enforcement resources to go after these people now we see that they're having the air marshals not paying attention to people that have been flagged as potential terrorists. Instead, they're following on plane flights. The air marshals are following people who flew on January the 6th. So Steve Friend says there is no benign or reasonable justification for this demand to get everything about anybody that interacted with Trump in any way, shape, or form on Twitter. When we look at what is happening with the new speaker, still trying to get a handle on where he is.

And there's now a back and forth as to whether or not they're going to slip FISA Section 702 into the National Defense Authorizations, the NDAA. That's where they fund and keep the Defense Department going. And, you know, so-called Defense Department that doesn't defend this country. The War Department, we should call it. Like, defense is a legitimate function of the federal government, but they really don't defend. They attack us. They attack internally with things like the fisa section 702 right um you put that in the defense

department what are they defending against that that's the government defending itself against you spying on you spying on mr mrs uh verizon as ran paul put it and when this um when james clapper committed perjury and of course was never charged with it by anybody when he lied to the senate when ron wyden asked him are you spying on americans without a search warrant uh well uh senator um uh not intentionally it's just an accident if we do yeah right and then within a month or two, you had the Snowden leaks. And everybody knew who had documents showing what they were doing. But nobody ever charged him for perjury. Instead, Michael Hayden, who has just recently said that conservatives are terrorists like Hamas.

Michael Hayden said, well, I blame Ron Wyden. We can do anything we want to under Section 702. It's such a safe haven, he said. Well, that safe haven for that kind of unconstitutional warrantless search of everybody in America is antithetical to everything in America. And it needs to be shut down. Matt Gase has said that they're going to have that voted on separately. But Johnson is being cagey about it and not saying that they're going to have that voted on separately, but Johnson is being cagey about it and not saying that they will do that.

So it's not really clear what they're going to do. And so it's very concerning. First, we see his about face with Ukraine. He was adamantly opposed to Ukraine, then became Speaker of the House. And then, yeah, yeah, well, let's give all the money that we can to Ukraine. And then we look at what is happening with George Santos, this lying, grifting, stealing criminal Republican. And so Kevin McCarthy did not want him removed.

Marjorie Taylor Greene did not want him removed. And said, boy, they have just removed their own credibility. And now Speaker Johnson, who talks a great deal about being a Christian, he says, you want to know what I believe? Look at the Bible. I think the Bible is very clear about getting rid of corrupt officials. And so they're going to put it up to a vote. He says, I'm not going to tell anybody how to vote.

We have not whipped the vote. In other words, we're not trying to influence anybody and say, vote this way, vote that way. He fabricated his entire resume. Everything he told you is a lie, George Santos. And then he played games with campaign money and violated laws. There's going to be criminal charges against him. He went before the ethics committee and the ethics committee found that to their satisfaction that he had violated this. But then they punted it to the Justice Department, to Biden's Justice Department. Johnson says, we believe in the rule of law. There are people of good faith who make an argument, both pro and and con for the exclusion, for the expulsion resolution for Santos. There are people who say that you have to uphold the

rule of law and allow for somebody to be convicted in a criminal court before this tough penalty would be exacted on someone. And that's been the precedent so far. Well, I don't know. You know, it's certainly you can impeach people, get them out of office. I don't know that one is better than the other. I think that the impeachment process is actually better because otherwise you're going to wind up with all kinds of nuisance indictments like we see happening with Trump now that he's out of office. They couldn't do that while he was in office. So I think you ought to run the Congress the same way. But the question is, if you're going to say that somebody needs to be

convicted in a criminal court before you enact a penalty on somebody, does that mean that, Speaker Johnson, are you going to now stop civil asset forfeiture? Because that is people's properties being stolen, and they're not convicted of anything they're not even charged with anything the police just steal their property and this is being this is being incentivized and and partnering with the federal government the federal government is telling local police departments you steal this stuff and we'll split it with you and so it is uh it's coming out of the federal government. You need to stop that.

Are you going to do something, Speaker Johnson, about January the 6th people who have been punished with tough penalties, who spent years languishing in jail, tortured in jail, getting excessive punishment and all the rest of the stuff? Are you going to do anything about that? So there's a lot of questions about that. But he says, I trust that people make the right decision that they'll make the decision thoughtfully and in good faith i personally have real reservations about kicking out a lying thieving criminal like george santos as i described he says about this

i'm concerned about a precedent that may be set for that. That's right. If you were to throw out a lying, thieving member of Congress, oh, that could be a very dangerous precedent for the sitting members of Congress, couldn't it? You need to set a precedent, Speaker Johnson, of integrity. That's what we desperately need from you. We need a show of integrity rather than politics and Machiavellian manipulation

taking the lead on everything. Wouldn't it be a nice, refreshing change? Let me go to our comments here. And the person who is going to be matching the funds today had originally said that he wanted to be anonymous, but now he said that we can mention his name. So I'll say it is Amos. So thank you very much, Amos. I appreciate that. And thank you to all of you who are putting in tips. Now.

I really do appreciate that. Uh, we have on a rock fan, James. Thank you very much. Uh, also on rock fan, Doug, a lug. Thank you. He says, uh, please hit the like and subscribe buttons. Let's help David get the word out here. Yes.

I thank you for reminding me. I don't sell it to even something that is free, you know, just hitting the like button and, and recommending the program or putting it out on social media. If you're on social media, that helps us a great deal. But just liking the hitting the like button helps us with visibility on the

platforms where we are. And so it is um you know in rumble on odyssey on bit shoot that helps a great deal and it also helps on the podcast especially on the podcast because of visibility there uh so uh thank you doug i appreciate that tip um both financial and um promotional thank you so much on rock fan a syrian girl thank you very much you On RockFan, a Syrian girl. Thank you very much. She said, good to see you today, David. I said a prayer yesterday. The problem was only technical.

Glad to see last night that it was a power outage. Yes. And I've had a lot of people mention Elon Musk, Skylink or whatever, but it's not in this area. And so that's the problem that we had. I said that we could easily do power backup, but the problem is, is that we get our internet from that as well.

And since we put it on a lot of different platforms, uh, we don't have, um, the bandwidth to do that. If we just do it with a cell phone, uh, like we did when we had a blackout in Texas.

Um, so we're still looking, you know, if we can get something to got the bandwidth and if they get star link here it is starlink is that right um yeah okay um uh rock fan uh andromeda one thank you very much please thank your matching funds contributor yes thank you amos i appreciate this so much thank you on rumble uh macker seven thank you uh bless you and your family david appreciate all you do on rumble super faith thank you very much that's very generous thank you for the anonymous donor and actually now he says i can say that's amos uh david and family what is your what is your

christmas list this year um well i don't know we didn't really put anything together. Um, we're really pretty happy. Um, I'll let you know if I think of something that, uh, uh, God has really blessed us. Thank you. Um, rumble, uh, I'm Marty. Thank you for the tip. Uh, he says, uh, please cut this building seven Tucker piece out as a separate video. I would like to send it to Tucker's biggest fan, Clayton Morris of redacted. Well, I don't know Clayton Morris, but I will cut it out and, um, I'll put it out today

on the video. Uh, thanks. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Uh, we're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk about what has happened on a black Friday video from target. Maybe you've seen it.

If you haven't, it's going to be interesting. But also very interesting to see what is happening to the malls and to retail space in general. And even people moving around. We've got some data about how they're starting to win. They're starting to keep us locked into our homes. We don't ever get out. That certainly has worked with me, but for a different reason. We'll be right back. Looking for better information? APSradioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world. APSradioNews.com. © transcript Emily Beynon You're listening to The David Knight Show.

All right, we have a tip from Jim Z. He's E7. Thank you very much. He says, love the Christmas music. DavidKnight.music. We have to find some way to get it out there. We're still working on it. I had to get this out.

Uh, hopefully we'll come to some resolution over the weekend. I figure out how to get this out. Thank you. Uh, by the way, that one, their jingle bells, I've got two or three of them, uh, that, um, I actually pulled out of, uh, may sound familiar to you. Of course I performed it and some of them i changed like the silent night that i added this year uh like the jingle bells that you just heard they're from leroy anderson's christmas festival and it was a you know a string of um a lot of

christmas carols that were short we used to it's kind of nostalgic for me and it was a lot of fun to go back and to do this and because it was something that we played every year when i was in band from junior high school up you know six years we played it and then we played it as at football games the last game of the season was a thanksgiving game we did lights out in the stadium which they won't let you do anymore they stopped that shortly after it's like, it's too dangerous. Somebody is going to fall. Well, there's plenty of lights. They just didn't have the big lights on the football field, but

they stopped letting them do that. And we had lights on our, on our, um, caps and we did a Christmas tree and, uh, you know, formation and we played that and did that every year. And so it was something that was a bit of um uh really nostalgic for me uh the jingle bells uh the new silent knight and then the one that um played uh did last year uh which is uh winceless and um i don't see that on the deck is that not on the deck uh but um that was the one that um is the castle you know a good king wenceslas and that begins in the same way that it was in uh the um christmas festival by leroy anderson uh so something that

i've enjoyed doing uh doing my own arrangement of um you know starting out with his and then reorchestrating it and doing some other things on the side on rock fan david coburn thank you very much and truck driver ron thank you there's a breaker breaker good buddy it's the david night show thank you they actually can promote it that way on cb so thank you and thank all of you and thank you amos for matching these contributions today. Thank you very much. Let's talk about what's happening in retail. And, uh, we have this video that surfaced with, uh, sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the jazz channel at APS radio.com and the AP. Sorry, we have so many different sort of let it play as short. I have so many different should let it play as short have so many different things on

the deck today i've got screen after screen after screen and the um navigation is a little bit different today than normally is so i apologize uh this is a live show uh but um take a look at what happened in Target on Black Friday. Look at this. This woman, they've got a Black Friday sign. It's black. And it says $649.99. She pulls it out, and there's a red one. The normal price at Target is that.

Oh, here's another one. Oh, so they had a sale, and it was the same price as the Black Friday sale. And she keeps going around. And of course, people have said this same type of thing happens on Amazon and a lot of online places, not just on bricks and mortar. But yeah, she's like, so what's going on here? Every one of these signs has the same price behind it. They just covered it up and called it a black friday sale so maybe that's part of the reason why black friday has uh you know not been such a big deal this year i don't know i didn't

go back and look to see if cyber monday and black friday when you roll it all together i'm not really sure where it is a lot of people i think it did uh was pretty big because a lot of people are now talking about doom spending so people don't have the money but they're going credit card debt for this type of stuff but here's the other thing that i think is even uh more concerning this is a mall in san francisco look at this they've got christmas decorations there but they don't have any stores and there's no people either every this person is panning around the camera and again you see uh christmas decorations everywhere they got poinsettias all the way up the escalator but the escalator's closed it's not working gonna take the stairs they gotta save on electricity i guess and they're walking down here and showing

the stores and they are all empty all the retailers have closed down and moved out and as they're walking around that mall in san francisco um not a creature was stirring not even a mouse so it's like this is what is happening in the democrat city i got so much um theft that's a big part of it but of course it's also the lockdowns and the lockdowns because it extends beyond just San Francisco. And it extends beyond the commercial real estate crisis that has been created by Trump's lockdown. There's an organization called Smart Cities World, actually a publication. And they looked at what an organization called Streetlight was doing. They're collecting information about people walking.

You know, Google had its experimental smart city that they set up in Toronto called Sidewalk Labs. And it was going to save the environment, right? All these smart cities are about saving the environment. So, you had a bunch of true believers, environmentalists that jumped into it said we'll work with this and that then they started getting out of it and they said this is about nothing other than monitoring everything that we do and uh hopefully we can get that message out to people before we actually have this imposed upon us those people volunteered and these are people who were die hard climate you know mcguffin people they're deathly afraid they think that the world is going to end because

of co2 totally on board with this mcguffin and yet when they got there they said this isn't about the environment this is about controlling and watching everything that we do. It's like, big brother, I want out of this thing. And they eventually shut it down in Toronto. So there's organizations that are still doing that. They keep very heavy tabs on all kinds of activity. Streetlight uses its Insight platform to grab data about people walking around on sidewalks even. And I'm not just looking at traffic because, of course, you know, when you do your use your map apps on your phone, it'll show you if there's heavy traffic, right?

Because it's monitoring what everybody is doing. And they've had that for a very long time. Going back to the mid 2000s, there was one company called inrix and they would monitor trucks uh semi-trucks and and um and there were a little bit of monitoring of people's data at the time uh but they would and and some um in some areas they would have uh government traffic monitoring devices and so they would have government traffic monitoring devices. And so they would show you what the traffic was, and you could see that when you would route it.

And that's what is now happening as well. But now with everybody using these traffic apps, it's much bigger than NRIX ever was and more accurate than that because they're getting everybody's data. As you're looking at your map, it's also looking to see where you are, and it's looking to see if you're moving or if you're stopped in traffic and that type of thing. And so they're doing that with the traffic. They're even doing it, though, with people walking on the sidewalk.

And so they're aggregating these travel patterns and looking at it and extrapolating the data from this. And I said in the 25 biggest metros, San Francisco, Boston, uh, the highest share of trips taken via active transportation mode, while Houston, Dallas, and Atlanta saw the smallest share of trips taken via an active transportation mode, talking about public transport, uh, that type of thing. Uh, but they say, um say also active transportation can include walking or biking trips. That accounted for 10% of the trips, down from 14% of the trips. However, bicycle activity is increasing as a share of all trips, while pedestrian is decreasing as a share of all trips.

But in general, it is decreasing it is decreasing you know we've always had this situation i remember when i was at texas instruments and um when i first started there uh we had a project and they had put a lot of different people they were going to be i was going to be a liaison to other companies like the apple and things like that for semi-custom semiconductors and so they had people coming from, um, all of their different, there were global con company, Texas instruments was. So they had a German guy, they had a French guy. They had a Japanese guy. They had somebody from Britain. I was there from America.

And so they were looking at, um, you know, training, these people are going to go back and they're going to interact with, uh, companies that wanted to have, custom integrated circuit but it was going to be a cheaper way of doing it because it would begin some of the stages that would be generalized for everyone and then the final stages would be customized and it was going to be a replacement for board level electronics which could which you know expensive, but they could also be reverse engineered. And so this is something to make it more difficult for people to reverse engineer it anyway. Uh, so we have all these people there. It's interesting to have,

uh, this international group there. And, uh, the girl that was there from the UK had her mom come over and, um, she was used to walking everywhere that she was. She liked to walk on sidewalks and she was upset about the fact that nobody walked at the time. Everybody was in a car. She said, there's not even any place to walk. And she said, even when I can find a place where there's a sidewalk, her mom said, uh, that, uh, people looked at her like she was homeless or some, you know, uh, she thought it was, uh, actually pretty dangerous because, um, it was, she was the only one anywhere that was doing any walking.

But now that the travel is decreasing, which is exactly what they wanted. And when you look at your map app, you may start to see the fact that Google is now starting to hide things that they don't like, even on the maps. It has been for the longest time that Google has hidden people and news sites that they don't like, like me. And we've said for the longest time that Google, which originally began as a search engine, is now a so-called search engine that is designed to hide things and to hide people. And now they're moving out to hide crisis pregnancy centers. If you look for the crisis pregnancy center in Washington,

DC, Google has removed that. They will, you look, you know, talk about pregnancy or something. It'll push you to a Planned Parenthood, but they won't show you the crisis pregnancy center. And that is being done in Pennsylvania as well. It's being done in a lot of different states. But Google is right there to remove it. They moved directions to Pro-Life Pregnancy Center and instead offered searchers options that included Planned Parenthood abortion clinics.

Yeah, that's what we can expect to see well before we take a break um let me just thank some of the people for tips again amos is matching tips today thank you amos i appreciate that really do that uh on rumble um yj 72 thank you david and i family for all you do love the Christmas music. I love hearing your family stories in the broadcast. Well, thank you. I'm getting old enough to talk about them. It's always live about my grandfather. He was kind of, uh, he was, uh, one or two steps beyond Joe Biden right now. And, uh, he was, uh, my entire life.

Uh, I knew him. He'd just walk around whistling. That's where my son gets it from him. He would just walk around whistling. That's where my son gets it from, I guess. He would just walk around whistling. And if he would engage you in conversation, he would say something like, it always began by, well, that reminds me of the time. It's starting to turn into my grandfather. When I start whistling on air instead of talking, you'll know.

On Rumble, emulated void. Thank you very much for the tip. And he says thank you, or she. On Rock, emulated void. Thank you very much for the tip. And he says, thank you. Or she, uh, on rock fan K bay. Thank you. Merry Christmas. And thanks so much for your labor of love to us all. And thanks to Amos too.

Yes. Thank you. Amos on rock fan Jody. Thank you. The world is a better place because of people like you are in it, David. Well, that's really kind. Thank you. Uh, may God continue to bless you and your family on rock fan, uh, Mark Crawford. Thank you. May God continue to bless you and your family. On Rockfin, Mark Crawford.

Thank you. NASA brought some green cheese back. The proof is in the cheese. Not in the pudding. It's in the cheese. And so there we go. That's, yeah. I'm sure they've got that set up somewhere, the green cheese.

We'll be right back. Hear news now at APSradioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story. © transcript Emily Beynon You're listening to The David Knight Show. missing you You're the doctor of my dreams With your crinkly hair and your glassy stir And your macular and your schemes Alright, so people say that you don't care

But you've got nicer legs than Hitler And bigger than Sherlock Henry Kissinger Oh, we're missing you And wishing you were here Well, there we are. We're missing Henry Kissinger already.

Money Python, the contractual obligation album. I actually played that at Bilderberg. he was a regular at bilderberg he was there every time and i played that uh one of the times i went to bilderberg we took a bullhorn and i pulled it up and streamed it from youtube and played it over the bullhorn to the people at bilderberg there were henry kissinger was in his honor of course and he has now passed away at the age of 100. Was he a war criminal or did he deserve the Nobel Peace Prize? Well, there's different opinions on that.

But when I look at his Machiavellian schemes and his continual presence at Bilderberg, I would vote that he was war criminal. That's the way I see it. Kissinger's power grew during the turmoil of watergate says the associated press when the politically attuned diplomat assumed a role akin to co-president for the weekend nixon uh i think that my take on all that watching it at the time i i think that Kissinger was always president and Nixon was co-president. I think he got kicked down the line a couple of other notches after the Watergate stuff. The same type of thing that you saw with Carter and Brzezinski, of course, right?

And the Carter White House is being run by Mika Brzezinski's father, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Zbigniew Brzezinski, or whatever the dude, right? Lebowski, Lebowski, that was it. Yeah, he was the big Brzezinski. And Zbig knew Brzezinski. But no, Brzezinski wrote a book in the early 70s. He talked about, he said the title of it was Between Two Ages. And he talked about the coming technocratic age is the way he referred to it, which is exactly what they're doing right now.

We will control and monitor everything that everybody does. We will have anticipatory intelligence, so we'll know what you're going to do before you do it. He planned all this stuff out in the mid-20th century, right? They're working this stuff. And then he worked about on the mechanism as to how they would consolidate into global governance. And, of course, beginning with economic unification and trade areas, like the European common market, and then gradually bring that into a European

union and really consolidate the political control control when you create a European currency. And he said, yeah, we'll do this type of thing. And, um, with the North American union and we'll do it with the European union and we'll bring in Asia under China. We'll set them up as the, as the, you know, the, the point man and all this stuff. And then once we've got these three different areas, we'll bring it in. And so as he was writing about these things that they're currently doing to us now, 50, 60, 70 years ago, these people liked him a great deal. They gave him a lot of money. They put him in charge of the Trilateral Commission.

Again, trilateral. Europe, North America, Asia, to bring these things together. We saw that mirrored in the trans Pacific partnership, the trans Atlantic partnership. Uh, these were things to, uh, essentially take the two wings of Europe and Asia, unite each of them economically with North America. Right. And then by doing that, you unite all three of them.

Eventually those distinctions of all three of them. Eventually, those distinctions of the three go away. And so they liked all the stuff that Brzezinski was telling them about the technocracy and about global governance. And so they then established him and the Carter administration to really run the show. And the same thing happened with Kissinger, a friend of the globalists. He was on board with all this stuff from the very beginning now what you have that you don't have these uh these characters that are where there's so much spotlight on them and i think they realized that they wanted to do this from you know behind the curtain uh more of a background process and so you don't have the brzezinski's and the um kissinger's there you know the um the the and the interesting thing

is that the presidents are such obvious puppets now that um it would really work against them to have somebody like brzezinski or Kissinger that was there. But Kissinger was everywhere, you know, not just regular at the Bilderberg meetings, but he was also there with Republicans and with Democrats that all invite him in. Trump invited him in. He was in the Trump White House many different times. You know, just like, you know, Trump was friends with Hillary. Trump was friends with Jeffrey Epstein. Trump was friends with Henry Kissinger.

Uh, and I have to say that, you know, um, maybe some people won't think that it was nice for me to make fun of Henry Kissinger right after he's died. Maybe it's too soon. I don't know. I think we've been waiting a long time for this. Anyway, um, I shouldn't say it like that uh but uh the uh he's not going to have a funeral that looks like this remember this this is in the uk this is a funeral and they've got everybody spaced out six feet apart the life of alan right one person gets up moves

his chair a very warm welcome as we unite in love. Another person gets up, moves his chair next to that person, gets closer. They're starting to move their chairs closer. Yeah, yeah. And then the funeral director comes out. No, you can't do that. Yeah, this is the kind of world

that people like Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski have left us. The kind of world that was imposed on us by Trump. No, he won't have a funeral like that. There'll be a lot more people at his funeral. And they'll be the important people. And you don't tell them where to sit or what to do. The stakeholders.

But isn't it interesting that this is something that I didn't see in the AP biography that they've got here. One of the things that you need to add to Henry Kissinger's biography is that even as he was some in his late nineties, right? Even in his late nineties, he was able to survive the greatest plague the world has ever known. The COVID thing, right?

He said he survived that. Isn't that amazing? Well, he is really a healthy specimen able to survive COVID even in his late 90s. Well, maybe it's not what you do, but who you know, isn't it, right? So tributes for Kissinger are already pouring in. So I'm a little bit late on this. I guess none of them played the Monty Python thing.

George W. Bush said, we have lost one of the most dependable and distinctive voices on foreign affairs. Now, that's diplomatically put. You can always depend on him being at Bilderberg. You could always depend on his distinctive voice to unify the world into a global governance in foreign affairs. Michael Bloomberg jumped in, said Kissinger was, quote, endlessly generous with a wisdom that was gained over the course of an extraordinary life. Well, we'll say he was a very smart guy. Um, and unfortunately when you devoid, uh, when you're devoid of character, uh, being

smart can be very dangerous to other people. And that applies to Bloomberg as well. Uh, you know, um, Charlie Munger died of course, last couple of days at 99, just shy of a hundred, uh, the partner of Warren Buffett. I saw Gerald Slenty put a thing out there. It's like, okay, so he's dead. Is he going to get a really, really big basket so I can take that billions of dollars with him?

Um, a big casket. Did he do anything? Said Gerald Slenty for peace? No, no. He lived, uh, Gerald Slenty for peace. No, no, he lived, uh, lived for himself in his own way. Now,

Michael Bloomberg says, um, a few years ago, he said, when I die, I'm going to go straight to heaven. No doubt about it. If there is a heaven,

if there is heaven, I'm going to go straight there. Why? Well, because I gave away so much money for gun control and climate and things like that. That's the way I'm going to get to heaven. You know, it's kind of interesting, isn't it? I think that it's pretty obvious when we look at design.

Everybody knows that there is an intelligent designer. Everybody knows that even the people who discovered DNA, Crick and Watson, they looked at it and said, well, this can't be chance. There's no way that this would be done by chance. You look at what a complicated code this is, air detection and correction and all the rest of the stuff and the DNA. This is sign of intelligence in the same way that if you come across a car, you don't think that it just spontaneously came into being. And you don't think that a building occurred because of a tornado in a junkyard. And so Crick and Watson looked at DNA and they said, well, there's intelligence there, but they would not attribute that to God, the God of the Bible. Well, I think that that

stands up very well. And there's a lot of different ways that you can look at that. I am convinced that certainly I think everybody knows they go to great lengths to try to pretend there's no God, no creator. But then there's another question, did God speak? And if so, where and how? And I think that it's clear that he's spoken in the Bible. And we've had J. Warner Wallace on cold case Christianity. But there's a lot of really good apologetics out there, answers in Genesis, a lot of other ones. Take a look at the archaeology.

Take a look at history. Look at textual things. Just so many different evidences that are there, certainly the prophecies that are fulfilled. And you go back and people say, oh, well, these were written after the fact. And then they found the Dead Sea Scrolls that predated Christ by 750 years and things like that. So I think there's a lot of evidence that God has spoken through the Bible. And what God said in the Bible is that it's not going to be about giving money for peace or for helping people with charity or for gun control or for climate control

or any of these other things that Bloomberg imagines. You can help your fellow man, but your big problem is that we're at war with God. It's one of the reasons why we've got this war in the Middle East. The Israelis and the Arabs are fighting each other because they're at war with god god has made peace with us and this time of christmas we understand that's why jesus came was to make peace between man and god individually there isn't anything that you can do for your

fellow man that is going to erase your rebellion to god. And we've all been rebels to God. Each of us has sinned and fallen. And as we rebel against the benevolent creator of the universe, what do we do about that? Well, the only solution throughout the Bible was a shedding of blood. And Christ did that on our behalf. All of that in the Old Testament looked forward to Christ. And he fulfilled all that.

And so it's not going to be by helping your fellow man. Those are good things to do. I believe that God will reward that. But you have to, before you can make that kind of sacrifice, you have to take care of that rebellion before that's acceptable. And so as we look at these funerals, i've played before i'm not going to play it now but in in vienna the austro-hungarian empire and the hapsburg family they have a crypt there that is um truly amazing um they've had the last of that family has died out and they had uh it's

been a couple of decades since they had the last one of those funerals. And I've talked about this before and I've shown it before. They had a very elaborate ceremony where the, first of all, there's this big crypt and when our, uh, when the family went to Vienna, we went to it and it truly is amazing. And they still have people bringing flowers for these dead emperors and empresses and everything. And, and the crypt that is there, they have these big,

uh, statues with, uh, skulls all over them. And they're very macabre looking really strange. And, uh, people are allowed to go in there and visit.

But when one of them would die, they had a ceremony where, uh, they would bring the body up and they would knock on the door. And the guy on the inside would say, who goes there? And they would read off body up and they would knock on the door and the guy on the inside would say who goes there and they would read off his title you know he's the emperor of this and the the ruler of that land and this long title because they had a very big empire and the voice inside would say i don't know him and then they would come back with something that was more personal

and shorter the next time. And he'd say, I don't know him either. He'd talk about his family connections, husband of this, person of that. And then the last time they would say, Franz Josef, a humble sinner. And the voice inside would say, I know him. Enter. That's the way we're going to stand before God, each and every one of us. These powerful men, Kissinger, Charlie Munger, the rich and the powerful, Bloomberg, when his time comes, they will stand before God in the same way that each and every one of us will stand before God.

And that's something that we all need to think about it's something that unfortunately i think these people are so impressed with themselves that they don't think about it and that's a real tragedy i've said many times many of these wealthy people um have uh ought to be pitied you know they're like a a ceremonial bull that has been fattened up for the slaughter. And, you know, you don't look at the bull that's got all the wreaths around its neck and everything that's being in a parade that's being taken to slaughter and envy them, do you? If you know what their end is going to be. And so we don't envy these rich and powerful people. We pity them.

And if they're politicians, we should pray for them that we can live quiet and powerful people. We pity them. And if they're politicians, we should pray for them that we can live quiet and peaceful lives. And there was one more story here that tied to those who have gone before. We've had Paul Revere's tombstone has been vandalized up in Boston because this person did not revere, revere.

It was evidently, you know, I guess they put out the information that he was a conspiracy theorist. He said the British are coming, trying to warn people. I try to warn people. I'm called a conspiracy theorist. I guess many of these people think he was. It was fake news, was it? No, it came true, just like these other things we've been warning people about have come true. But it was done by a guy who apparently was homeless, had mental issues, and the rest of this stuff.

He also damaged a Holocaust memorial, a one-man crime spree in downtown Boston, charged with vandalism, malicious destruction of property, and injuring a religious building. But isn't it a metaphor for our time? That we are a people who don't even understand what we're destroying. You know, the Black Lives Matter people, the Pentagon people, all of the DEI stuff that is happening, they're just going through and leveling everything, destroying monuments, Pentagon especially, memorials to men, honorable men, that they cannot hold a candle to, and destroying them. Perhaps it's because the lives of these men are something of a reproach to our

current leaders but perhaps it's just because they want to erase our society and do their great reset i think that's it but yeah it is a metaphor isn't it of what is being done in our country um let me get to uh some of the comments and even tips. Again, Amos is matching the tips today. So thank you so much, all of you. On Rockfin, Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Guard. God bless you and the family, David, and thank you to Amos. By the way, thanks to your music and the little bit of Eric Idle's cheer,

uplifting spirits and smiles abound. Well, thank you. And on Rumble, Geesebusters, thank you very much. That is very kind. I appreciate that. Free geese control for Amos. Thank you, Amos. Yes, thank you very much, Amos.

I appreciate it. Our family does. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz Channel at apsradio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind. S.A. Ere te, o tata, a toki, e tu, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a toki, a You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, Tony is going to be joining us shortly. Tony Ardaban of Wise Wolf Gold.

And, of course, he set up DavidK. That goal to take you to where he is. I want to talk a little bit about financial stuff as we're connecting with Tony. We've had 64 branch banks filed a shutdown in a single week. This is a story from epic times. You also find it on zero hedge. This is pretty amazing. When you stop and think about it is it a prelude to a

cashless society as we're seeing in some scandinavian countries where they shut down the branch banks and said well we're not gonna you know even the atms shutting them down not giving people cash this is one of the ways that they do it are the banks struggling perhaps that's it but i'm suspicious that there is something else happening. Big banks like PNC Bank, JPMorgan Chase, have filed to close several branch offices in multiple states, a troubling pattern of rising branch shutdowns in recent years. Between November 12th and 18th, several banks filed to close branch locations, with PNC Bank having the most filings.

They filed for 19 branch closures in many different states. Pennsylvania, Illinois, Texas, Alabama, New Jersey, Indiana, Ohio, Florida, others. J.P. Morgan followed with 18 branch banks shut down. Citizens came in third with eight. You had U.S. Bank with seven, Bank of America with five, Citibank with two. Altogether, these banks shut down 64 branches in just one week. Now, is that an aberration? This is part of a trend, frankly. As they point out in this article, recent closures have been escalating, and they've had net closures now for several years. And it even predates the so-called pandemic.

Between 2017 and 2021, 9% of all branch banks shut down. The closure rate doubled during the so-called pandemic, but it is still proceeding. As a matter of fact, this is the third consecutive year that net closings have exceeded 2,000 branches being shut down across the United States each year, three years in a row. And so when you look at this, and they're talking about net closings, because they're building new branches and you'll probably see that in some places. But last year they had 3,012 branch closures with 958 branch openings. So the net closure was 2,054.

And again, three years in a row that this has been happening. I think that they understand what is happening. There's certainly under a lot of pressure. The entire banking system is under a great deal of pressure, but they also understand that we are pushing to have, um, a, uh, a cashless society. Um, so we got Tony on the line. Can we go directly to him or do we need him? Yeah.

Okay. Let's uh, let's welcome Tony Artiman of wise wolf dot gold. And Tony has set up David Knight dot.Gold to also take you there. Thank you for joining us, Tony. Good to see you. Good to see you, David. Thanks for having me. Well, I tell you, we're seeing a lot of things happening very quickly now with crypto, with gold, with interest rates. What do you see in terms of, I just talked about these branch banks that are shutting down. That's my biggest concern, of course, is not just if people look at a time of inflation and we now have a lot of

big banks and the economic analysts are saying, yeah, we think there's going to be credit easing. Gerald Salenti has said that they're going to do it because of the election year. And of course, that is true. And so they're going to ease the interest rates. That's going to cause more inflation that always causes gold to go up. They've been fighting going to ease the interest rates. That's going to cause more inflation. That always causes gold to go up. They've been fighting gold by raising interest rates in an amazing amount. But the thing that really concerns me is this push towards CBDC and a cashless society. But what do you see in terms of the economic issues as you're watching it closely? Well, I think the banking issue is systemic.

I think it's worldwide. You just had the CEO of UBS come out and say that they're going to need a rescue out of Switzerland. This isn't good. the United States. And that prompted Janet Yellen to clarify and say that not all banks are going to be bailed out in the new order when things do collapse. So I think what you're watching and the financial networks are never going to pick up on this until it's too late. You're seeing the price of gold arise in the face of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates, the fastest rate in history that they've done that. They were able to curtail inflation a bit and cause the perception of a strong dollar, I think, globally. But gold continues to rise. Last year, going into November, David, I believe the price of gold was just under $1,700 an ounce. China has added hundreds of tons of gold to their holdings. The central banks around

the world continue to buy gold at a record pace. And I think this is what's driving gold. Ultimately, it's demand. The United States and the Federal Reserve is not going to buy gold because the dollar competes with gold and value. And I think what you're watching is this is historic as a revaluation of currencies and central banks are going to gold for a safe haven. That's what the rich and the elite are doing because this system has cracks in it. It's very volatile. Yeah. And as you point out, you know, they have raised interest rates and done it at a very fast rate that's one of the reasons why banks are under stress is because they got caught with uh holding banks holding bonds and they couldn't uh trade them out quickly enough and so that uh put them underwater with that stuff but it's also created

havoc in the real estate market gold prices are holding uh while their value while new home sales have dropped 5.6 percent in october and it's not just that you've got a cryptocurrency that is uh going through a correction as it's dipped down to 37 000 gold is um hanging in there even though they have raised interest rates and the rest of this stuff and uh so i think as as people look at this and realize that in an election year, they're going to cut the interest rates significantly. It's only going to go up. But my key thing, again, keeps coming back to having it for privacy, having it having something that is outside of what they're going to control, because who knows what they're going to do? You know, you see all these different branch banks shutting down.

They could do anything they want. They could do it very, very quickly. Well, they're going to build, in my opinion, and I think you'd agree with me, they're going to build the central bank digital currency on the backs of the banks that compete the most to audition to be the rollout for that. I think that's what these big banks are doing. They'll be buying up the smaller and regional banks. This is a consolidation game. I mean, ultimately, the new world order is just about consolidating. So I think that's what you're going to see. These banks are going to be auditioning, competing to roll that out. And the regional banks are going to suffer. They'll be less and less focused on the individual or a customer service. I mean, we've lost that completely in this economy and

the new age of things with our stock market, not based off profit anymore. So we've completed, that ship has sailed a long time ago. So I'm really skeptical of the banking system right now. I don't tell people to not have a bank account, but you definitely need to be skeptical of all your holdings in one place or being in the system i like having physical gold and silver there's no counterparty risk you hold that in your hand that's something that's real and you know we can talk about crypto and we can talk about bitcoin i still think bitcoin has a story to tell there's something there to watch um but it's very volatile as well. So, you know, you're right about just being outside of the system. And I think really, David, it's so counterintuitive because we have to watch these prices. We're always watching the markets, but, you know, gold went

up 2000% from 1971 to 1979. But that's not because the gold went up in value. I think that's what you're having to come to terms with here because we're not taught this in school. They're never, they're never going to let you in on this secret. The dollar constantly loses purchasing power and the amount of abuse that has gone on. And, and just in the last five years, unprecedented, you know, 80% of all the dollars ever created were created in the last 48 months so yes Jerome Powell can raise interest rates he can calm a lot of the fears of our global partners and people that use the dollar in the petrodollar but ultimately it loses purchasing

power and they're not going to be able to I don't think they can simultaneously keep a strong dollar and lower interest rates because the economy right now is begging for cheap fiat currency debt. And that's these big multinational corporations, these ESG corporations, environmental social governance, that they're looking for cheap injections of cash. The Fed's going to have to do something. And when they do that that you'll be able to go back and and cash out these bonds with devalued dollars and it's it's really going to wreak havoc across the the spectrum of what the dollar uh entails and i think that's what we're going to have to watch out for just really putting too much faith in the system and um gold in my opinion is a safe haven

and silver is a safe haven outside of that well you know they've always uh targeted to have regular their target what they would like to see happen is inflation of about two percent and uh and because that helps them to monetize the debt you know they spend it and then they can pay it back with cheaper dollars as you're pointing out uh when you look at what happens with gold, gold is really holding its value. And we've talked about that in the past. You go back and you look at something that somebody bought 100 years ago, and it's pretty

much the same amount of gold as it was 100 years ago. And it's the dollar that is constantly losing its value. And that's by design. They've wanted that. But now it's kind of getting a little bit out of hand. It's way above 2%. And they're worried that it's going to completely get out of hand. And we've seen that in our lifetime. And as you point out, there's quantitative easing where they increase the monetary supply.

They play games with the interest rates. But I had David Stockman on the other day. And he was talking about the fact, he said, look at the massive stimulus that was put out there. That really does dwarf even their quantitative easing and the money that they threw into the repo markets and this and that. I mean, they're just printing this stuff out and throwing it to everybody. But the stuff that happened during the lockdown and that stimulus thing,

that was a massive shock. Another person said, so what the, what the central bank is going to do, they've got themselves kind of over barrel. And what is the, the federal reserve going to do? They've,

they've gone from like 900 million to a 9 trillion in a short period of time. Are they going to go from 9 trillion to 90 trillion? Is that what they're going to do? And if they do that, what does it do to their currency? It's crazy. Well, it completely tanks it. I think we're at the end game of post-1971 currency model. And we went off the gold standard in 1971.

Gold was $35 an ounce. Kissinger, who just recently died, he pegged the dollar to crude through the Saudis. That's what's known as the petrodollar. Yeah, he created that. They didn't give him credit for that. They didn't talk about that in AP either. None of the places talked about how he created the petrodollar

that's falling apart in this now. Oh, they didn't give about that in AP either. None of the places talked about how he created the petrodollar that's falling apart on us now. Oh, they didn't give him credit for that or Cambodia or a lot of the coups that took place in South America. They didn't give him credit for that. Secret bombings, yeah. Secret bombings, yes. You look at the 70s, David. I think something really interesting happened.

I was listening to a podcast the other day with Robert Kiyosaki, a rich dad, poor dad, and he had all these old guys on. I like listening to the old traders, the old guy. This is back in the 70s when the Hunt family put a run on silver and drove up the physical silver market. Now, this was, again, this is just off the heels of us coming off the gold standard. Gold was rising uh silver had always been pegged to the dollar as well and so they started buying up the hunt family here in texas started buying up uh physical silver and i'm just in massive quantities and you know if you really look at it the deep state most likely took out the hunts they used the financial system because they were exposing something very um really the the power structure did not want them to see which was how weak the dollar was so you know you always see

a dollar as a silver dollars you know 0.735 ounces make one dollar that's how it was from the founding of the country until until we remove silver from our coinage and so the hunts were exposing that and uh you know bunker hunt said that the price of silver could go 50 an ounce in in mid 79 and of course it did in 1980 went to 50 an ounce and the deep state came in along with the regulators and really took out and hobbled uh the hunts for doing that and no one ever again picked up that mantle no one i think it was warren buffett for a little while became the primary holder of silver but didn't encourage people to buy us physical was not in that was not trying to drive up the price just holding same thing with jp morgan i think what we're about to say, I think this could be another silver boom just based on

the fact that this happened before when we've had a massive shift in our currency. This is another one of those shifts, except this time, David, I don't think they can put the genie back in the bottle. I think there's not, when you talk about going from $9 trillion to $90 trillion on the balance sheet, like you just said, well, there's no more room. They have no more room to play with this. I mean, you, when the total debt of the U S in 1980 was less than a trillion dollars. So it's, it's 33 trillion and climbing rapid. The wheels are completely up. There's no,

we don't even have fiscal hawks anymore. We don't talk about budgetary matters we're 130 percent of debt to gdp in this country so i think this you know being outside the system i think this is why you know your show is so important we're not talking about investments folks david and i don't really talk about investments we're not we're we're really talking about how to protect you and your family in the coming uh new order of things the great reset okay that's what we're we're really talking about how to protect you and your family in the coming uh new order of things the great reset okay that's what we're talking about so being outside of the systems is great but also these are monetary matters and i think that if you really look at the history here

there's an opportunity for you to protect yourself and and your wealth against what's going to have a major devaluation and de-dollarization, the likes of which we've never seen. I think silver is going to be an important part of that story. I'm just kind of thinking about that, what happened in the last cycle, which was the end of the 1970s. Yeah. I like the way that Bill Holter put it. He said, we look at what's happening in Switzerlanditzerland as you mentioned with ubs and then uh you've got credit swiss is going to try to go in there and bail them out but they're not in that strong a position either and he said uh keep an eye on silver which is what you're just saying he said it may be the pin in the gold grenade i like the way that if you pull out that silver

pin that gold grenade is going to explode. But again, you know, we've never had a situation before where the government is going to try to corral you into complete surveillance state. Just as Nikki Haley saying, I've got to know your name. If you're going to get on the Internet, I've got to know your name. But when you look at the CBDC, it's even worse than that. It's like you buy anything. I want to know your name, and I want to know what you're buying,

and I'm going to keep an inventory of everything that you're buying, and I'm going to tell you whether or not you can buy anything in the future or not. I mean, you don't want to live in a situation like that. It may be necessary for us to have to have some CBDC credits so we can pay our government taxes that may be required or something like that, but we don't have to be uh completely captured into that system if we've got physical money that's outside of that that's the key thing i think you would be surprised i think your audience would be surprised too i mean i'm in the business and i

know how liquid gold and silver are i mean i can i can trade my gold and silver anytime uh day or night pretty much and turn it into fiat currency so to me and historically gold is money but i think you're and silver is money but i think your audience would be surprised how many people will just trade in gold and silver uh people that i use for contracts people that do work for me um you would be surprised folks just how many people will trade directly and if not you can find a reputable dealer you can find private individuals that will be able to buy from you it's so imp it's going to be so important in the future for us to have physical money outside of

this system because i think there and i think david has talked about this many many times they always use a crisis this will be the perfect opportunity as an excuse. Never let a good crisis go to waste. They're going to use this coming crisis that they themselves perpetuated to bring in and usher in the central bank digital currency, in my opinion. Yeah. Oh, yeah. And it'd be very easy for them to do that. And then once they get everything online, just think how easy it'll be for them to pull the plug on everything. And how long is it going to take for everybody to really freak out? You know, we had,

uh, yesterday we were out of, uh, electricity for about seven plus hours and the whole area, all the schools shut down, all the businesses shut down. I mean, everything just comes to a screeching halt.

They can do that with electricity. They can do it with the internet. You know, if you get, everybody is, uh, transferring everything on the internet as they get us more and more under central control, they can pull a plug on everything so easily now. And as you're talking about being able to trade

outside of this very vulnerable system that they've got, uh, it's just like our, our supply chain, you know, as we saw during 2020, we have this wonderful idea of a just-in-time delivery, and it's working great, and the shelves are full, and then all of a sudden you put a kink in it, and you break part of that chain, and it all falls apart very, very rapidly because it is so complex, and because they've set up something

that has so many different travel components in each length of those chains, and so you break that, and now you've got a big crisis on your hands. So these complex systems that they have designed are very easy to sabotage. They can fall apart on their own. And so it's important to be on the outside of that. And I think about back in the Depression, and you probably know some stories about this

as well, Tony, some of the cities that would get together and they would create their own local community currency. You had some of them, they still have some of these in museum pieces where they would make wooden nickels and other things like that. But it would be local tokens that people would use, in a sense, kind of a way of doing barter and exchange within that community because, you know, the drying up of the money at that point in time, I don't know, you could argue that it was deliberate or whatever. But the bottom line is it wasn't as structured and planned and deliberate as their move to try to push us into a cashless society is. You know, it was a lot of bad economic planning that was part of it. It may have been some conspiracy as part of that as well. But, you know, people had to find a way to exist outside of that financial system, the Federal Reserve, because they completely screwed everything up.

This is going to be more by design. It's going to be really deliberate, and they're going to make this – it's really going to be weaponized. Well, I agree with you. In those Depression-era stories, you know, we still were technically tied to a gold standard. So the credit wasn't as elastic as it is now. The problem with now is that we're tethered to nothing. Credit's more elastic.

But the fiat currency, the dollar itself, loses so much purchasing power every time you do that. This new system is based off of debt. It's based off of currency creation you know if you buy a house that money didn't exist before so you want to call it money that currency didn't exist before they created out of thin air to create that loan credit card transactions are the same way so with this mountain the sea of debt and that's it creates new currency units which expands the money supply which devalues the currency because it's backed by nothing so i think that's one of the that's the other that's a flip side of this there

might be elastic credit you might be able to get something uh but it doesn't really matter it's not going to have the same purchasing power that it did and it's going to constantly lose purchasing power so that's why you know gold and silver are ways for you to stop the music, you know, like we said, musical chairs and you don't want to get left holding the bag. That's right. Yeah. Deutsche Bank is talking about how they think that they're going to drop interest rates a couple of about 2 percent, 175 basis points is their projection. Everybody is saying that interest rates are going to ease up because it's an election year. They don't say because it's an election year. Solenti says that we know that it's because it's an election year. They don't say because it's an election year.

Solenti says that we know that it's because it's an election year, but they're going to do it one way or the other. You know, it might be an opportunity for some people to refinance their house if they got something recently, but it's going to be something that is going to be inflationary. And then they're playing a very dangerous game when inflation is already this high to do that.

And it could easily get away from them. Tell us a little bit about what you think is going to happen in Argentina as you've been looking at this. This is a guy who's going to get rid of their central bank. I mean, is he going to wind up like a JFK or will he get away with it? That's a good way to start you have to you know something the flip that dramatic uh you know because i've gotten so skeptical on elections anymore i mean i look at i'm like is any of this real i i don't know i'm skeptical of how all these things turn out i'm skeptical of people that rise to the top somehow that maybe have a good idea i'm like how did you get there yeah um so

i guess i'm jaded and a little bit cynical, but I like it when it, even when somebody rises to the top, like, like the Argentina's new president, I think it's interesting because he's bringing a lot of ideas to the forefront that maybe people never heard before. He's going around with his chainsaw, which is fun. I don't know much about it. I can't endorse him or anything.

I don't know much about him, but I think his ideas as an anarcho-capitalist, it's time for us the same principle of of uh you know carl marx the fifth plank of the communist manifesto is a central bank why are we following the communist manifesto in a free market yeah um so these these are good you know status you know it's like we we have all we lift up all these entrepreneurs you put up an elon musk but he tied to the hip, connected the hip with the state. I don't know if that's really, is that a genius entrepreneur? I met some genius entrepreneurs when I was a kid growing up in Texas, watching my dad, I saw some, and nobody was coming to bail them out. They didn't have government contracts. You know, they built stuff from the ground up and they used, they were creative and they had creative financing and they had to use their brain and had a lot of courage.

I got to see that when I was a kid. So I don't know much about the Argentina new president, but I like the fact that we're going to discuss not having a central bank. Exactly. Because that caused the problems. That's a key thing. And they may not pull something on them. They may not pull a JFK because the IMF really wants something done that is radical. So I think, as you point out, we don't really know who's behind these people and what they want to have done, but the population is absolutely desperate when you've got a large majority, they will find a way to deal with you later if they need to.

They won't get in the way of the election and stuff, the ballots. They'll just deal with you later. So maybe that'll happen. But in the meantime, he's perhaps going to educate South Americans in Austrian economics, which he's a fan of. So that's good to have that conversation. And he is bringing a lot of ideas to them. But it'll be interesting to see what happens down there.

Tell us a little bit of what is happening with Wise Wolf Gold. Well, we're busy going into the holidays, as always. And I'm looking to buy more product. That's why I set up the second location here in Denison, Texas, here just south of the Red River and on the border of Oklahoma, trying to buy more products so we can put it into Wolfpack and create a convenient location for people. We're just about an hour or so from the trading floor here in Dallas. So we're busy. We're handling, you know, small orders, large orders.

And if you've got, you know, needs for precious metals, we can fill that for you. And of course you can go to DavidKnight.gold if you want to support the show. You can click the link that says join Wolfpack. I really want to get to a thousand members. It's funny because I'll add 10 and lose eight and add 12 and lose. I'm right in this window where I want to grow because the more people that join Wolfpack, the better deals I can buy for everybody. And we've got the gold back notes are going in. We got Christmas rounds for silver, Santa Claus stuff and other Christmas

related silver coins are going into the Wolfpack. And I've bought lots of fractional silver and fractional gold. So with these rising prices, I mean, especially with gold and gold got about, I think, really right on the edge of breaking its all time high again. I think it was within like ten dollars in the last 72 hours and i think this is probably going to be something that just continues and again i would remind people it's not because gold's going up necessarily in value the demand is high uh not here in the u.s so much but the demand is high worldwide and the dollar's losing purchasing power so look at it more counterintuitively. Yeah, we talk about central banks accumulating gold a lot,

but I saw that individual investors in China, it's gone up by 16% year over year in terms of demand for gold. And they're looking at this. They've got economic problems as well. I was showing a ghost mall in San Francisco, but I've shown videos of people walking through big towns like shanghai and guangzhou where they have ghosted everybody with their lockdowns and their zero covet stuff and now they're starting it again so these people are are hunkering down they're very concerned

about what's happening they're very conservative about it and and so it's one of the reasons why gold is really going up in china much more than you see it happening here in the u.s the u.s is kind of complacent about that a lot of people think that these types of things are not going to be happening here well if you really look into the the 16 spike in year over year a lot of those purchases are in smaller quantities so people can fly with them you know the the one ounce gold bars and so on and so forth. It is an unprecedented time for a currency revaluation like we've never seen before. And I don't even know how to use history as a guide, David. We've never really been down this path as a country,

as a modern economy, where we're going to lose so much of our world's reserve currency status. And that's going to spill over into our economy. The repercussions, I don't know how far it will go, but I think it'll be very deep. And I think Americans are really kind of complacent about this. It's one of the reasons why gold is so much cheaper here than it is in China. And it's actually created kind of an arbitrage opportunity for the bigger investors in China to buy gold up more cheaply here in the US and sell

it in China yes because people again people there have seen uh you know much shakier situations than we've seen here even though we've been through 2020. uh still people just at their gut level uh don't believe that war is going to come here they don't believe the economic crisis is going to come here uh we haven't seen that in our lifetime or our parents' lifetime. So we just don't think that's really going to happen. But the people in China do. And so there's a big discrepancy there with that kind of demand. Demand is pulling it up there. But here, the Fed will take care of it, or maybe Biden and his geniuses will take care of it or maybe biden and his geniuses will take care of this right economic geniuses well it's always great talking to you tony and again

wolf pack is a way that you can set aside and save on a regular basis and he's got a lot of different levels that are set up there he's got some uh he's got a community that is set up there he's got some uh he's got a community that is set up as well as uh being able to take advantage of uh some discounts in terms of group buys that are there but of course he'll sell you anything in any quantity large or small thank you so much tony for coming on always a pleasure talking to you and thank you for your support of the program as well appreciate that thank you thank you david have a good day. And remember, davidknight.gold. We'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.

Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio.com. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show well what we're talking about, Javier Malai, he's got a lot of interesting things to say. He is an interesting character, very entertaining, and it's one of the things

that gives me a little bit of concern. This is the way he conducts his private life and public life there. But he had an interesting statement. And when I uh axel kaiser i've interviewed him twice now over his book uh i think street economics if i remember the title correctly uh but it was very popular book in spanish and latin america and he i was surprised he actually knew uh javier malai because they share a common perspective on economics and of course axel's book is um really more along the lines of the way austrian economists would explain things not trying to create some kind of an abstract uh macroeconomics that is detached from reality and say no it's going to operate basically the same way that your your home household budget operates. You've got to have it rooted in reality.

And so it is rooted in reality. It's got 15 short lessons that talk about trying to explain economics to people without a lot of complicated formulas and hand-waving, as we refer to it. But one of the things that I thought was interesting about, again, Javier Malai was the way that he's approaching his leadership issue. And I thought it was interesting because he said, I didn't come here to guide lambs, but to awaken lions. I thought that sounds very familiar. You know, it was Alexander the Great who said that he's not afraid of an army of lions that is led by a lamb. He's afraid of an army of lambs led by a lion.

In other words, if you've got people who are, you know, energetic and can accomplish stuff, but if you've got a bad leader, somebody who's afraid to take the initiative or to take a risk or whatever, you can have a lot of lions who could get a lot of stuff done. But if you've got that sheepish person who is leading them, you're not going to get anything done. And yet he is saying, I came here to awaken lions. He really is a bit of a lion himself I think in the way that he's approaching this and I think it's interesting the way that he he engaged them to create a common purpose and this is the way that a lion will motivate a bunch of lambs he said we aren't above the ones that we represent in financial terms he said the derivative is never worth more than the underlying asset the derivative exists because the underlying asset exists we

exist as representatives of the people because the people exist it is madness it is delusion to think that a representative of the people is above the people that he represents themselves and so this is his analogy you know as a christian we look at this and we say and this is one of the reasons why we talk about public servants right there's certain things out of the bible that have worked their way into our vocabulary even the idea of talent right that really comes from the parable of jesus where he talks about three individuals who were given different amounts of money, and they had it by talent of gold or silver or whatever. But it was, you know, the quantity, talent was actually a weight. So it was a quantity of money that they were given because they

used metals. And so we look at this and we say, well, you know, God has given us not necessarily money, but he's given us abilities. What do we do with those abilities that God has given us? And so we talk about that today instead of talent has gone from being that comes from the Christian perspective that these people are to serve the public. As Christ said, he did not come to be served, but to serve. And so that was a way that they saw their role. They saw their role as being stewards. They saw their role not as kings or

emperors but as stewards and the king was the constitution and they were here to serve the public but we don't see that anymore and of course that's not what was happening in socialist uh argentina with the peronistas running this thing and so he says these people become elitists they're there to uh to serve themselves they think that they're above you and yet they only exist there because you are the underlying asset of them i think this is a great perspective to look at this as we're talking about you know i don't know about this guy personally i've got some issues about it personally that that make me scratch my head uh but he is a very effective leader in terms of the way that he looks at things he says their privileges are over their party is over i think he means it in terms of like you know their celebrations uh because you know real privilege celebrations. Because, you know, real privilege, if we understand, right?

It's amazing when you look and you deconstruct what these Marxists are doing everywhere. They talk about privilege here and privilege there. You know, they project, they call everybody racist. They say that you are guilty of hate speech, even if you are, because you're opposing their narrative. Oh, well, you know, you don't want to lock down. You don't want to get the vaccine. Well, you're hateful because you're going to kill people. Because you don't follow my orders for help.

So it's all about following their orders. And if you don't, you'll be hateful. You'll be racist because they hate you. Because they are the racist. And they accuse you of privilege when they're the ones who have the real privilege. They have the political privilege. That political privilege has created the two classes of people. It doesn't have anything to do with skin color.

Then how you thing to do with your background or your family. It has to do with their political privilege. And that was what he was addressing, uh, the real privilege that is there. And so he says a different Argentina is impossible if we have the same old people. Boy, isn't that true when we look at our election? How are we going to get a different America? Everybody agrees that we're on the wrong track pretty much, right?

Whether you're Republican or Democrat, whether you're conservative or Marxist, you think that we're on the wrong track. Well, I mean, the Marxists don't. Maybe the liberals do. Self-described liberals. And we're going to fix it with the same old people. We're going to fix it with Biden. Or we're going to fix it with Trump.

Or, you know, most of these people who are running are the same old people. And they're literally old people. Very old people. You keep doing the same thing, expecting different results. That's the definition of insanity. And so we are in that position in spades. And so he says, why are the attacks intensifying against us? And we see that happening in every aspect of our society as well and culture. The cultural attacks are escalating everywhere. Why are they escalating? Because they believe that this wasn't going to happen. They realize now that the population is shouting freedom,

and so they are now trying to imitate that. But it actually, as we look at these escalating attacks, as we've said in the past, it really is a sign of desperation. And so he says, as I said in my first speech, I did not come here to guide lambs. I came here to awaken lions, and they are waking up, and they will devour the thieving politicians. This is exactly what a lion leader would do to turn his lambs into lions. He would give them this type of talk.

For the longest time, we've had leaders who tell us to be quiet to go to sleep but you know even as christians we need to understand that we're not called to be passive yeah as lambs as sheep right we can follow the lamb who was slain we can follow the lion of judah who told us that the gates of hell are not going to prevail against us that means that we're going to storm it we're not going to sit here and fortify this in a monastery thing. We're going to go on the offensive. And we've got a message to tell. And we've got a message of hope to tell people. And yet we keep voting in the political side, and there is no hope on the political side. That's the key thing.

If we are going to conquer, it's not going to be with the same old politicians or the same old institutions or the same old perspectives. And we're not going to keep focusing on that. We've already been told that we're not essential by Trump. We've been told that we are deplorable by Hillary Clinton, but I think people who believe they're going to get a solution out of this that is political, I think they're delusional. They're not deplorable,

they're delusional if they believe that. And because, by the way, if Trump were to win again, you will be non-essential again. And so Malaya goes on to say there's a light because people are waking up. They discover that slavery is not a good deal, that there is a better life, which is to live as free men. And you'll be free when truth sets you free.

You'll be free when you are freed from the cares of this world, when your leverage point is outside of this world. Then you'll be free to act. You'll be free to be away from these concerns. And as we look at this, the corporatocracy, as this article on Zero Hedge points out, America's dangerous desire to demonize masculinity must stop. I don't think that's America's desire.

I think that's the desire of the corporations and the corporatocracy and the government, the merged government and corporations. They're pushing that on us. They're demonizing masculinity. And so one of the things that we need to understand is the real uh each and every one of us are a real role in recent years as i said it's become frighteningly common to hear the phrase toxic masculinity we don't even you know as soon as we hear toxic we think masculinity not going to have one or the other separate it It's become a joint thing.

That's the power of propaganda, of repeating a big lie over and over again. The belief that masculinity has a negative influence on one's behavior is related to reduced mental well-being. And as I say in this article, there was a time not long ago when masculine traits such as strength, courage, assertiveness were celebrated by all Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or their political affiliation. So when did things change? He says, well, it seems like it happened in the 80s. I would actually put it a little bit earlier than that. I think this is part of the

women's lib movement. And we look at the role of corporations in terms of pushing this forward go back and take a look you can find them on youtube take a look at some of the virginia slim's commercials you come a long way baby right they always begin with some kind of a quasi-victorian situation and you know this this situation. And this woman is caught smoking a cigarette by her husband, who is this toxic, masculine guy who dominates her, stops short of beating her, but he is portrayed as a slave master. And so how do you get liberated from that? Well, according to the corporations, you smoke cigarettes. You smoke their brand of cigarettes. That's how you free yourself. How do you free yourself from the constraints that have been put on you by this patriarchy? Well, you free yourself of your children. You kill your children and you get a job working for the corporations.

Well, isn't that obvious? You know, when you look at this, it's like they're telling me that I should go. I should not stay at home. I should not have children that I'm going to enjoy. Instead, I'm going to go get a job working for a corporation because that's going to make me happy. It's going to make the corporation happy. It's going to make the corporation happy to sell you cigarettes to give you cancer.

And it's going to make the corporation happy to see the population decrease after people are no longer having kids. They're pushing all of this stuff that is not in our own interest. And, of course, part of this is creating a weaponized competition, just as they're doing now with skin color and other attributes. They pitted men against women and vice versa throughout all of that. The Me Too movement, says this article, was the final nail in the coffin of masculinity. 2017, the year of Harvey Weinstein's sexual misconduct became public knowledge. See, Harvey Weinstein was reprehensible, but it wasn't really unexpected, was it?

You know, since the earliest days of Hollywood, there's been the casting couch. Since the earliest days of Hollywood, Hollywood has been characteristically depraved, degenerate. I mean, I've mentioned this before. There's a Hollywood series that was done by the BBC. And they look at the early days, and they have some very interesting things there

about how they didn't have any way to do any special effects. And so everything had to be practical. If you're going to, you know, if you're on a car or train or you're on the side of a building, you're really somebody up there doing that. And they hadn't really worked out how to fake anything. And so they really had people doing these dangerous stunts. And so they had, you doing these dangerous stunts. And so they had programs about that. They had programs about how the cameramen who were hand cranking the stuff, how do they keep that rhythm up so that it is consistent?

Even when they're like strapped to a biplane that's going upside down, they got to keep rolling that thing. Each of them would have a song that they would sing to themselves, a particular tempo to kind of keep that thing going. And so there was a lot of stuff about that, but there was also stuff about, uh, the wild depraved parties. And in the early days, the reason he wound up with a Hays code was because there was so much, uh, nudity and sex in the early days of silent films.

And so Hollywood was always that way. I was not surprised to find that out about Harvey Weinstein, you know, pressing people to do things both male and female. This is always the way that it was in Hollywood. But what they did that was different was they made Harvey Weinstein, not somebody who was characteristic of corrupt Hollywood moguls but he became the poster child thanks to the media and the government Harvey Weinstein became the poster child for all men and all men are not like Hollywood moguls not at all but that's what they wound up doing. So the interesting thing was that they demonized and created this competition between sexes based on somebody like Harvey Weinstein.

As they point out in this thing, they said that men and women complement each other. More importantly, we need each other. And that is true. But again, you go back to those early days, you know, in the mid 20th century, uh, this, um, you don't want men, uh, they don't compliment you. Uh, they are, you know, to be pushed out. And I look at the Taylor Swift phenomenon and I don't really understand what's going on with that. So, uh, she, her fan base is almost exclusively female. It's like, what is going on with that?

And I'm not really sure. I just can't bring myself to get very interested in that. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back on Rumble. Thank you, Mad Mim. Thank you very much for the tip. God bless the Knight family and Amos. Yes, thank you very much, Amos. I really do appreciate it. Amos is matching the tips that we get on Rumble and Rockfin. We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News,

they say the hard rock and roll is competing. You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, let's talk a little bit about President Trump. You know, he's now, as I said at the beginning of the program, his lawyers are now saying that he did not take an oath to support the Constitution. It truly is amazing to see this. Whoops, sorry.

To see this approach happening here. And let me find the clip here because I have got, like I said before, I've got so many things here. It's hard to find things. Um, here's, here's Trump. I, I seem to remember, I thought everybody saw him take an oath. I Donald John Trump do solemnly swear. I Donald John Trump do solemnly swear.

That I will faithfully execute. That I will faithfully execute. The office of president of the United States and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution of the United States. So help me God. So help me God.

Congratulations, Mr. President. Yeah, so we all saw that. But his lawyers are saying, no, he didn't swear to support the Constitution. And actually, maybe this is not just a prevarication. Maybe that actually is true. And he had his fingers crossed behind his back or something. And a filing made to the Colorado Supreme Court, lawyers for former President Trump say that he

never took an oath to support the Constitution of the United States. And he should therefore not be banned from the state's presidential ballots in 2024 based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which says that if anybody has taken an oath to support the United States

and they're engaged in an insurrection, then they're not eligible to hold office again. In the New York financial fraud civil trial case, of course, we've also had Deutsche Bank testifying that they didn't lose anything. We've had now multiple people who are supposed to be defrauded have come forward and said, no, actually, we knew what we were doing and we made money off of this deal so we all knew that that was nonsense but of course it doesn't mean that they are not going to that it began with

a judge finding against him and so he probably will lose that and have to win that on appeal but getting back to this what i thought was amazing about this was that they chose not to fight this thing in Colorado on the basis of insurrection. Should have said, no, it wasn't an insurrection. Instead, what they did, these genius lawyers decided that they would fight this on the basis that he did not take an oath to support the constitution. They said, no, it's, it's not the same thing when you say that you're going to, um, that you were going to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution. That's not saying you're going to support it.

It's like, what does that mean? And then it's also absurd because they said that the constitution that the president rather, uh, uh, is not an office. The presidency is not an office. The presidency is not an office under the United States. And so the president is not an officer of the United States. And that President Trump did not take an oath to support the Constitution. All of that is patently absurd. It's the worst kind of prevarication language tricks that you can imagine. And it is absolutely absurd to say that you're not taking an oath to support the Constitution.

Look, preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution is really what support is about, isn't it? It's a lot more explicit than just saying that you're going to support the Constitution. You're going to support the Constitution by preserving, protecting, and defending it. It's the same thing. And they're trying to say, well, because he didn't use the word support, because he said preserve, protect, and defend, that now, since the word support is in this 14th Amendment Clause, since that's there and since that's not in the oath,

he didn't take an oath to that. And even just as ridiculous, the idea that the presidency is not an office and that he is basically that he's not under the Constitution. He certainly has acted that way. But what a stupid argument to be made. And, of course, the people who are opposing him in this point out that the Constitution explicitly says over and over again, the office of the presidency, the office of the presidency. It's almost as if Trump's lawyers, just like Trump, never read the Constitution.

He put his hand on a Bible. He held a Bible up once. He never read the Bible. He's talked about supporting, rather preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution, but he's never read that. He's never read the Bible. The lawyers have never read the Constitution. Again, the office of presidency over and over again, explicitly in the Constitution.

And they said the natural meaning of an officer of the United States is anybody who holds a federal office. And the presidency is referred to as an office over and over again in the Constitution. And so, you know the preserve protect and defend is actually stronger than support this is a characteristic of trump you know these idiotic uh lawyers that he surrounds himself with that's how he got in this january the sixth thing uhying to people about things that they know are better. That's how he got into all of this stuff. Why would they play these kinds of silly word games? Again, wouldn't you think that the way that you would oppose this is to say, well, this was not an insurrection. It was not an insurrection. But he is, you know, the presidency

is an office. He is under under the constitution and he did swear to support it when he said he was going to preserve protect and defend it so you know this is uh trump is just increasingly be clowning himself when you it is just just ridiculous. He jumps from one idiotic thing to the other. And of course, the best way to characterize this is what some of the Republican senators don't support him. We're asked about some of the policies that are coming out of the Trump campaign. I would want to call it a brain trust, but I think you have to have a brain in order to have a brain trust.

But some of the policies that are coming out of it, and they characterize it as a saying, well, throwing a lot of spaghetti on the wall just to see what will stick. And I think that's really true. That's what he's always done. That's what he did when he campaigned in 2016. He threw a bunch of spaghetti on the wall to see what people liked,

and now double down on that. And then, of course, completely ignore all that when he becomes president. His 2016 promises were complete nonsense. So as Ross Story has it, former President Trump's proposed policy agenda for a second white house term is being met with shrugs and skepticism by members of the senate republican caucus on his truth social platform he said that he wants to get rid of the affordable care act also known as obamacare uh and of course he didn't do anything about that either. He's going to fix the borders. He's going to get rid of Obamacare.

These were issues eight years ago. We got a lot other of other issues. And a lot of the issues that we're faced with right now are precedents that Trump put in when he was president. Uh, those are some of the biggest issues that we face right now. And neither he nor the other people out there are really talking, even talking about any of these things. DeSantis is talking about CBDC and Ramaswamy has talked about it, but the rest of them either support it or they want to pretend that it's not a threat facing us.

But he said, as they point out, he didn't do anything about Obamacare in his first term, even when he had Republicans in control of both chambers of Congress. They didn't do anything about it. This has always just been an empty promise. This has always just been spaghetti on the wall that they threw. I don't want to terminate Obamacare, he said. I want to replace it with much better health care. You mean like the health care that you gave us in 2020, where the government started giving us health orders,

where they overrode what we wanted to do with our own bodies, where they overrode what our doctors said should be good? When you put in death panels, when you put in death protocols in the hospitals and you paid for that to be done, you financially incentivized death panels and death protocols in the hospitals, that paid for that to be done you financially incentivized death panels and death protocols in the hospitals that kind of uh health care you know what trump did in 2020

was the very epitome of what we all were concerned about with government-run health care you know government took over not just paying the bills oh Oh, it literally took over our healthcare in 2020. And Trump has the audacity to say that he's going to run, uh, and fix Obamacare. The Hill spoke to several Republicans about these. And of course, um, there were people that do not support him like Thune and Mitt Romney, actually Mitt Romney was the one who had first time I've agreed with him on anything, uh, he's the one that had the quote about it's like throwing spaghetti on the wall to see what sticks. He was absolutely right about that. And he would know that because he does the same sort of thing as well.

And then now Trump is trying to embrace Black Lives Matter, a group that he previously said, quote, hates our country. He's got one guy who is co-founder of black lives matter in rhode island and of course the other guy who co-founded it with him absolutely hates trump and there are several different black lives matters out there that have incorporated in different ways but everybody except this one guy has come out to oppose trump in the wake of this one person supporting him. But here's the thing. Now Trump is saying, oh, black lives matter.

I love them. They're great. If he is elected, expect him to radically pivot to the left. And I say that even more so than what he did in 2020 and 2020, he radically pivoted to global. He was the anti-globalist, and he pivoted to it. This is a guy, a New York Democrat, who gave us gun control by executive order. You wouldn't be surprised, except that it's coming from a Republican, supposedly. This

is a guy who loved Hillary Clinton. And look, when he is reelected, his desire to be thought well of and to be remembered well in the history books is going to override everything. Every promise that he makes to conservatives is going to be overridden by this. And he is going to suck up to the radical left the same way that he sucked up to the globalist controllers in 2020. There's absolutely no doubt in my mind about this. And so, again, he is now pushing this very hard. And he's pushing against the pro-life people. Oh, they're too radical. Too radical.

By the way, when we look at this, I was looking at the politics. And Pence, completely despised by Trump supporters, didn't last long at all. Now he is pivoting to the Christian book circuit. And he had previously written a book, So Help Me God, talking about how he had to obey his oath to the Constitution, interestingly enough. And why he did not go along with Trump on January the 6th. So now he's pivoting to, now that he's out of politics, essentially, he's going to try to push himself on the Christian book tour.

And so he's written a book, Go Home for Dinner, advice on how faith makes a family and how a family makes a life. He co-authored it with his daughter. Now, this might be a good book. I don't know. You know, when I look at Jimmy Carter, his wife just died. Now, Jimmy Carter seemed like a really nice guy. He did a lot of stuff when he got out of the presidency,

working with Habitat for Humanity that was good. He was an awful president, if he was president. As I said before, I think Zbigniew Brzezinski was the one who was really running that presidency. But, you know, maybe the same thing will happen with Pence. Maybe he'll find his footing and have something to say in terms of trying to encourage people to have a family life. I don't know. He

said, when our faith is strong, when our families are strong, America will be strong. Well, that's good. The problem I have is that Pence doesn't really live out the life of a Christian when he's vice president. He pushed us into war as vice president. He's sitting there on this warp speed climate pandemic thing. He's shutting down churches. He's standing by while churches are being shut down. How does he justify any of this stuff? He's going to reinvent himself now at this point. But one of the things that I thought was interesting was he said that he uses the Billy Graham rule.

And I kind of knew what he was talking about with that because I had a discussion with Alex when he was just before the 2016 election. Alex was thoroughly disgusted with Pence. He says, can you believe this guy? You know, he's so holier than thou and he won't even get in an elevator with a woman and i said well i think that's really pretty smart

i said if you go back and you look at another guy that i wasn't a supporter of gary bauer he put himself out as a as a christian he was with the moral majority or something like that the christian coalition something like that uh the Christian Coalition, something like that. But, you know, he's presenting himself out there as a Christian. And yet there were concerns because he was having these very long private meetings with a female, young, attractive female assistant. Now, whether there was anything or not, I don't know. But what it did was it exposed him to that kind of disdain from people and suspicion. And he dropped out because of that.

And so I don't know if there was anything about that or if it was just a whispering campaign or slander, but it cost him that. So I said to Alex, I said, no, I think that's really very wise policy to do. And that was being done before all this me too stuff with Harvey Weinstein and

everything happened. As they point out in this interview with Pence, he said, they say it was his commitment to protecting his marriage and by extension, his family that compelled him to follow the Billy Graham rule, both in personal and in public life. The rule is a practice of avoiding situations that might be perceived as compromising to your marriage. This meant for him avoiding dining alone with women other than his wife,

not attending events serving alcohol without his wife by his side, something he famously told The Hill in a 2002 interview. That revelation garnered both support and criticism from the press. Some viewed it as a means of safeguarding relationships, while others derided it for potentially limiting professional opportunities for women. Alex's thing was, he's just a goody two-shoes, you know, reflecting on the polarizing reactions to his adherence to the rule.

He stressed that maintaining professional boundaries had not hindered opportunities for women in his team. Instead, it fostered a respectful work environment, unlike Harvey Weinstein and his Hollywood moguls. He says, it was remarkable that we were being criticized for putting a premium on respecting our marriage and avoiding the appearance of impropriety and also creating conditions in the workplace that were respectful of the men and the women who worked with us. And so, again, I think that was a wise policy. I think his support of the lockdown, lockdown even of churches, I think was something that was inexcusable.

He hasn't come to term with or apologized for all these people in the Trump administration. None of them are held accountable by people who support them, no matter what they do. They go hobnob with Klaus Schwab at World Economic Forum. Well, anybody else other than Trump, they'll be held accountable, but not Trump. And speaking of hobnobbing with the globalists, take a look at Nikki Haley. She now has support from Jamie Demon. I guess we could have a new political action committee. It could be Demons for Nikki.

I did come out and make a nice statement about Nikki Haley. You did? You've been talking to Nikki Haley? Yes, I have. Even if you're a very liberal Democrat, I urge you, you know statement about Nikki Haley. You did. You've been talking to Nikki Haley. Yes, I have. Even if you're a very liberal Democrat, I urge you, you know, help Nikki Haley too. You know, get a choice on a Republican side that might be better than Trump. Yeah, that's right. Your hedge position, right? You're going to support both Republicans and Democrats.

That's what all these rich people do. That's what Trump always did. You know, I want to make sure that I own both sides of this. So I come out ahead. And she had already met with Jamie Diamond, or I want to make sure that I own both sides of this. So I come out ahead. And she had already met with Jamie Diamond, or I like to call him Demon. And now she gets the endorsement of the Koch Network. And of course, the Koch Network has in the past given money to Hillary Clinton. I'm surprised they're not supporting President Trump because he's also given money to Hillary

Clinton. The Koch Network has about $70 dollars that they've put into politics and so i guess things are going to go better with coke uh for nikki haley certainly you have um de santis taking notice of this and he put out a video called the real nikki you know i often say that the reason i got into politics was because of Hillary Clinton. I went with my friend Eleanor Kitzman to a firm and leadership program where Hillary Clinton was speaking. And I walked out of there and I said, I'm running for office. Hillary wannabe.

Dealt with immigration based on a quota. We'll take X number this year. We'll take X number next year. The debate is on the number. It's the wrong way to look at it. We need to go to our industries and say, what do you need that you don't have? We need as many immigrants as we can. Start to listen to your businesses and do what they need. Nikki Haley think we should be bringing in more refugees. And America's always been sympathetic to the fact that you can separate civilians from terrorists. And that's what we have to do. I do not think we need to pull money from the U.N.

We don't believe in slash and burn. When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media accounts. A huge issue that I'll deal with as soon as I get there is social media. Every person on social media should be verified by their name. We need to know exactly who they are and they need to show their own name. They need to verify every single person and I want it by name. Let's increase the gas tax by 10 cents over the next three years. No one jumped in more forcefully or seemed angrier at America than former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley.

Quote, tonight I turned on the news and I am heartbroken, Haley wrote. It's important to understand that the death of George Floyd was personal and painful for many. In order to heal, it needs to be personal and painful for everyone. But wait a second, you may be wondering, how am I, quote, personally responsible for the behavior of a Minneapolis police officer? Yeah, very effective commercial from DeSantis, really defining her. Look, she is pro-war. She loves every war. She's Lindsey Graham in heels, even though the real Lindsey Graham may be in heels for all we know, like J. Edgar Hoover, when you don't see him.

But she wears the heels in public, unlike Lindsey. She loves war. I call her Nuki Haley because she wants war without any limitation. She loves the U.N. You heard her there. I don't want to cut any U.N. funding. She was U.N. ambassador. She loves that institution.

She wants I.D., global I.D. She wants to know your name. Do you know her name? Do you know her name? Do you know her name is not Nikki? It's Nimrata. Anyway, yeah, she's backpedaling on abortion, which he didn't talk about there, and the trans issues. She's doing everything they want. But when she says, we need to ask the businesses what they need and so forth, That's why she's picking up these endorsements

from the Koch brothers, from Jamie Demon and big business is because she's going to open up the floodgates for cheap labor to help replace Americans. And that's something that she, same place as Ramaswamy. Both Ramaswamy and musk when they did the interview both of them were talking oh yeah we got to get good people in these americans they just can't do anything uh yeah and so it is the big replacement ramaswamy musk uh nimrata haley all these people

who want to put this through no restrictions on, on immigration. As a matter of fact, we need to go to the corporations and tell them to, we need to get our immigration policy from the corporations, from people like Jamie demon, from people like Ramaswamy and Musk. She says, listen to the corporations. They're going to be the ones who are going to tell us what our immigration policy should be. I can't think of anybody that would be worse than Nuki Haley.

Uh, she is so, uh, far to the inside with all this stuff. Uh, I, one thing about that that surprised me that I did not know about her, which is how much she loves Hillary Clinton. I mean, who, what does it say about her that she would find Hillary Clinton inspiring and just remember find Hillary Clinton inspiring? And just remember that Hillary Clinton began her political career as a Goldwater girl. Now, she was on the conservative side, and Nikki Haley has made this journey, I guess, in reverse, but she'll revert to form. She'll be another Hillary Clinton, going to every war that she can uh and uh so in the regard that she loves hillary clinton a reason i got into politics was because of hillary

clinton she recalled attending a conference where clinton uh was a speaker i walked out of there and i said i'm running for office so that's something that she shares with Trump as their admiration of Hillary Clinton. I've played for you the many different times that Trump has effusively praised Hillary Clinton and, of course, contributed to her campaign as well. Haley must wonder when Chris Christie is going to quit. He's polling in double digits in New Hampshire, but whatever Haley stands to gain from the possibility that Christie will humiliate DeSantis there,

she loses by the fact that Christie's support clearly will come at the expense of her own. And again, Chris Christie, another one of these guys, pushing war, pushing the pandemic, pushing all the rest of this stuff. I thought there was an interesting article from RT. Would anything change for the U.S. and the world if Biden were not president? And it kind of reads as a Biden version of It's a Wonderful Life.

It goes back and it looks at his life. The guy who wrote this is a U.S. journalist, Tony Cox, even though it's on RT. He says it's sometime interesting to play what if. You know, what if Adolf Hitler had become a successful artist and didn't get involved in politics? Or, more to the point, what if Joe Biden had been expelled from law school when he got caught plagiarizing a writing assignment. Again, it's like it's a wonderful life. You have this one thing that happens and, you know, except I guess in Biden's case, we could call it, it's a bumbling life.

Because when you look at what he just did, he went to an event and I don't know where it was, but listen to what he has to say. This is Nick. Hey, Nick. This is Nick. How are you, buddy? Good. Now, look, my Marine carries that. It has a code to blow up the world.

That doesn't, this is not nuclear weapons, is it? Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Okay. He's going to get the camera. I probably wouldn't think I'm kidding. No. It's our train operator. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. weapons is it all right okay yeah yeah yeah my marine my marine carries a code to blow up the world that's what he says to a stranger when he meets him that's a supposed to be a joke i guess yeah another clown another sock puppet my marine he can't even he doesn't even have the mental facilities to

make a joke out of that and so again it's a bumbling life so as this person says so what if things had all changed for joe biden at the very beginning you know what what if uh because he was caught plagiarizing they'd kicked him out of law school you know there's a interesting book how few Few Remain, written by Harry Turtledove, alternative history. I really like alternative history novels, and he's very good at it. But in it, it's about the Civil War, and the book begins, and you've got a courier who's been given some orders, and he starts to take off and he

drops it and that happened in real life in real life he dropped it and um the um that fell into enemy hands and they knew what lee was planning to do and but in this alternative history the guy says wait a minute you drop this and he picks it up hands into him he goes can you imagine what would have happened if that had fallen into enemy hands? Well, we know what happened because it did fall into enemy hands. But he goes on to, because it doesn't, you know, Lee goes on to early victories and to win. And so then the rest of the novel is, so what would it have been like if the Civil War had ended early and all all these different characters had survived. People like Jeb Stuart, people like Stonewall Jackson, people like Abraham Lincoln.

Losing the war, being disgraced, eventually he has Abraham Lincoln coming back as a socialist leader. Which is pretty appropriate and accurate. So it's kind of interesting to look at these alternative history, kind of like it's a wonderful life or it's a bumbling life the decision by syracuse university in 1965 to let biden who was then 22 repeat the course rather than being kicked out of school did not appear to be consequential at the time as one of the worst students, Biden ranked 76 out of 85 at a mediocre law school. Biden probably seemed like someone of little consequence, a guy who might be chasing ambulances or doing estate planning for elderly clients back in his home state of Delaware if he managed to graduate and pass the bar exam.

The stuttering son of a used car salesman, Biden has never displayed the attributes of a dynamic and virtuous leader. No one could honestly claim that he rose to power because of inspiring ideas, great political skills, or impeccable character. Just as he got away unscathed at Syracuse, preventing what would have been the destruction of his career even before it began, Biden escaped accountability time after time over the course of his half century in politics. When he got caught plagiarizing speeches of other politicians during his first campaign for presidency in 1987, he became a media laughingstock and he had to quit

the race, but somehow he managed to continue to keep getting elected in Delaware. Uh, he was close friends with the DuPont family. That might have helped. He also ran unsuccessfully for president in 2008 before serving two terms as vice president for Obama. And so he's looking at this and saying, so what would have happened if he hadn't made it? He said somehow no amount of lying, no amount of plagiarizing or racist gaffes or corruption allegations, none of that was able to thwart Biden's rise to power. When he was accused of sexually assaulting a Senate intern on Capitol Hill,

the Me Too movement suddenly went silent. Likewise, at an age when sexual harassment is a career killer for many Americans, Biden has been politically unscathed by his handsy tendencies, even as he campaigned for president in his basement in 2020. Anyone with an internet could watch clips of him groping or sniffing women and little girls at public events when he was vice president. And then the diary of his daughter, Ashley Biden, and the passage in the diary about taking showers with her father

at a young age and saying it was, quote, probably not appropriate and that it had contributed to her promiscuity when she got older. None of this stuff made any difference with him. It's almost like he's got a guardian angel or demon moving him along, isn't it? This is kind of the case with most of these guys. Many of his lies are absurd and inconsequential as if he's telling them for sport. Like when he claimed that he'd worked as a truck driver or the one about

coming from a family of coal miners or the lie about being quote, raised in a black church, unquote, rather than being political liabilities, his dishonesty, his thick facedness might be amongst the traits that got him pegged as a potential figurehead. He can look a skeptic in the face and tell him exactly the opposite of the

truth and shame him for daring to ask a pointed question. There's an infamous clip of Biden doing just that to a voter in 1987, when he bragged about his intelligence by telling multiple lies about his academic record. He insulted the man by saying, well, I'd be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you'd like. That level of unflinching confidence and condescension while lying is perhaps one of his biggest selling points. And not just for him, but for all the ruling elite. You can see that with Hillary.

You can see that with Trump, right? They do that type of thing. They're able to get away with that. His lack of any moral conviction also comes in very handy, you know, like Obama, Bush, Trump. Some of Biden's defenders try to deflect criticism of his character by pointing to the flaws of his political adversaries, especially Trump. Sadly, this has become the standard reaction of both sides. Any damning truths in today's politics,

it's not false to say the other team's leader is guilty of something. If you've got skeletons in the closet, it appears to be a prerequisite for reaching high office. But in this approach, it means that nobody is ever held accountable by their supporters. You know, when you talk about that, yeah, but what about, look at what Trump did. Yeah, but what about Biden?

Or you talk about Biden and say, yeah, but what about Trump? And this is one of the reasons why they have just two parties. If you got multiple parties, it doesn't work that well. If you got three or more people in the debate, it doesn't work that well. But if you've only got two people, you can just keep, you know, pointing out the character flaws and the crimes of your defendant. And if you take them down lower than you, you win.

That is a characteristic of the two-party system. Oh, by the way, they're now saying that there's not going to be any presidential debates, most likely. There's not going to be any right now. And of course, the debates have become a laughingstock and have been for quite some time it's never been more painfully aware of how off topic these questions are how childish they are and so yeah why bother to have them uh it would be nice if we could have these people actually do a real debate over the real issues that are before us but they're not going to do that. And one of the reasons is they don't really have any strongly held beliefs or principles, and they don't have any difference of opinions on the vital existential issues that are before us.

Whether you're talking about war or the economy or whatever is happening in Washington, they don't really care. They're not interested in getting a constitutional limited government in any way, shape or form. And they do want war everywhere. And so he finishes his article here. He says, so even though it might be fun to fantasize what might've been,

if Biden was held accountable for cheating at Syracuse or somewhere else along the way, it probably wouldn't have made much difference because they would have had people just like him to take their place. And that's really where we are. The voters would not have been given a more honorable option. And that's the way that all really works is given these options, right? They're going to carefully control who is allowed to run. That is carefully

curated by this two-party system. They really do have a lock on that. Before we take a quick break on RockFan, Patrick S., thank you very much. That is kind. Never do I get more excited about commercials than Christmas time on The David Knight Show. God bless all in the chat and in the Knight family. Well, thank you. Rumble, Atomic Dog. Thank you for the tip. He says, I'm counting my blessings every day. Today, I thank God for David Knight.

Well, that's really kind. Thank you. Keeps my moral compass pointed toward God and righteousness. Well, thank you. ACSAB. He puts a tip and he says, oh yeah, matching. Yes. Thank you, Amos.

I appreciate that. C-R-H-A-S-E-11. David and family seem like very nice people. I would support them financially except for the fact that they hold a non-Christian belief that Christmas is a Christian celebration. No, actually I don't. I'm not saying this so that you'll give me a tip. I'm saying, I have said over and over again, and my son can verify that, I have explained to them that, and I understand the position that people have on it.

I don't hold one day holier than another. And I also understand the history of Christmas. I understand that it was done in opposition. And what I support about Christmas is that it is done in opposition to a secular society. And even though I don't believe that it's the day, as a matter of fact, I explain to my kids, I think most likely time when you look at, you know, when Zachariah was going in to offer sacrifices and the angel, he met the angel who announced that he was going to have a child, John and so forth. And then Elizabeth meets Mary six months later and all that kind of stuff. If you look at that, there's two different times that he would have as priest, two different times a year that he would have been there. So if you start to look at that, it gives you a time of sometime in spring or sometime in the fall that that would have happened. And then there's other incidents there that would indicate that it might've been spring or fall. But at the same time, I think that it is an opportunity for us to

talk about the incarnation of Christ. And so we do that. And I think it's an opportunity for us to engage the culture. And so we do that. And I make no apologies about it. And I will not make any apologies about any of this stuff. I don't believe it's something that i have to do i don't believe that it is something you know i i could celebrate christ's birthday any any time the bible is not clear about when it is and i can celebrate his incarnation uh but um that's my belief on christmas and uh again if i've got an opportunity uh to uh to talk about something i'll take the opportunity to talk about it if it presents itself. And that's the way I see looking at Christmas and about all the war on Christmas stuff and everything. You understand when you look at all this stuff, how these people are so bent out of shape about everything that they even want to purge Santa Claus, which, you know, Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer was a song that was written by a Jewish songwriter, secular.

And they want to purge that. It doesn't have anything to do with Christianity or Christ or anything like that. But it's an opportunity for us to say, no, you're not going to impinge my free exercise of religion. If somebody wants to celebrate this and really believes that it is the day that Christ was born, I'm not going to tell them that they can't do that. If they care about it, I would say, well, you know, my family would not celebrate at all. I don't take that approach. I want to talk about what happened. And that's the way we are when it comes to Christmas time. That's my personal belief. We'll be right back. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have access to the best

channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio.com. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show you know what we're talking about then as a matter of fact, I have an article about that very thing. Canadian Human Rights Report claims that Christmas and Easter are examples of systemic religious discrimination, trying to shut them down. You see, they are concerned about this. And when I look at this, it's like, well, if they're going to use this as a justification for religious discrimination against Christians,

then I think that we push back on that. You know, when we talk about Easter again, instead of calling it Passover or calling it Resurrection Sunday or something like that, calling it Easter again, it has been secularized in certain ways, syncretism where it's been mixed in with existing culture. But where these people are coming from is they want to purge any religious exercise out of the public square. I absolutely resist that. And so they're saying that Christmas and Easter holidays are a form of religious intolerance and systemic religious discrimination

because they're statutory holidays in Canada. According to the Discussion Paper on Religious Intolerance, published October the 23rd, they said discrimination against religious minorities in Canada is grounded on Canada's history of colonialism. You see, we're colonizers if we celebrate Christmas and Easter. No, the colonizers are the Marxists and the technocrats. And as far as I'm concerned,

we have free exercise religion. Celebrate as you wish. But these people are saying, bah, humbug, right? Christmas and Easter are the only Canadian statutory holidays that are linked to religious days. As a result, they said, non-Christians may need to request special accommodations to observe their holy days and other times of the year where their religion requires them to abstain from work. Describing Canada's history with religious intolerance as deeply rooted in our identity as settler colonial state, these Marxists said it appears to associate Christian church

with 20th century efforts to teach 150,000 Canadian indigenous children through compulsory boarding schools, which they just got just exposed as a lie. The fact that these churches were burying indigenous kids and prosecute. But that was already that train had already sailed. They'd already established that in the public's mind. And so you need to understand what the real goals of these people are. That's the reason why I pushed back against it. Thank you for joining us.

APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic

by listening to The David Knight show. Please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask.

Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It's The David Knight Show.