The David Knight Show - 30Sep22 Vaccination by Mosquitos "Comes Out of the Closet", NPR Cheers
Episode Date: September 30, 2022* Targeted biowarfare against key individuals in the military: Lost in the novelty of the country's first transgender Army officer turning traitor is that he was collecting DNA info on officers and sp...ecial forces to give to Russia* Windbags use tragedy of hurricane Ian to push their climate agenda. While tragic, Ian is NOT unusual nor unusually strong. * Vaccination by mosquitos. Gates' longstanding dream and our nightmare comes true. NPR & mainstream media cheer* Fauci has been the DeepState Godfather in charge of bioweapons and "defense" since Dick Cheney put biowarfare under his department* A year ago Biogen produced an Alzheimer drug that would have bankrupted US healthcare at $56,000 per year per patient. Medicare pushed back but now Biogen has produced another Alzheimer drug and their stock jumped 45% in anticipation a day or so after they settle, for nearly a $BILLION, a lawsuit alleging bribery of doctors* Superconductor minerals, artificially created in labs, found in asteroids. Is it an indicator of extraterrestrial intelligence?* University tries to cover horrific Neuralink animal experiments and failures, but no one is concerned about the goal — to do this to HUMANS* FOX reporter exposed as shameless shill for MIC* Major brands pull back from Twitter as their content is featured next to kid porn and "minor attracted persons" — but newly elected Italian leader's statement about God, country and family are purged by Twitter and YouTube* LaLa Harris gaff declares North Korea our ally even as the Biden Administration appoints the first-ever "envoy for plants and animals"Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie The Power of Choice Spring Sales event is still on at Toyota dealers nationwide.
With incredible offers, including our biggest ever power booster of up to €3,000
and flexible payment options.
But it all ends soon.
So talk to your Toyota dealer today,
test drive your choice of hybrid, plug-in hybrid,
and the all-electric BZ4X,
and see why Toyota is Ireland's best-selling car brand again this year.
Toyota, built for a better world.
Terms and conditions apply.
Best-selling claim based on latest published monthly figures. Using free speech to free minds.
You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday, the 30th of September, year of our Lord 2022.
Day 930 of the emergency.
And there is a real emergency in Florida after the hurricane hits.
But of course, as we see with every kind of disaster, the left has jumped in to try to push
their legislative agenda
over the bodies of people who are there.
Hopefully, there's not going to be the kind of
carnage that has been alluded to.
We're going to talk about that,
but we're also going to talk about
what is ultimately behind this lockdown.
More connections with Fauci and the deep state that could perhaps explain why he is getting
paid so much.
He's got actually two jobs.
He's head of biowarfare and has been since he was put in there by Bush.
Isn't that interesting?
You know, put into his position by Reagan, elevated to bi-warfare by Bush, made president by the president Trump.
We'll be right back.
Stay with us.
Well, the headlines that we've been seeing everywhere for the last couple of days,
two and a half million people out of power.
The liberals must be excited about that.
They want everybody out of power.
It's a good start.
Two and a half million people out of power. You had one sheriff who said that there would be hundreds of bodies,
and it has been devastating there where it hit land in Fort Myers.
Absolutely devastating.
Just wiped everything out, raised it to the ground.
So far, though, they've only found one person who's been killed,
so that's hopeful.
And two people were killed in Cuba.
But 150 mile-per-hour winds.
They said hundreds feared dead after Florida hit with 150 mile per
hour winds and massive storm surge. And growing up in Florida, as I said before, I used to hear
this all the time. And it's one of the things that made me cynical about media, because even
though it was bad, they would always take it up several more categories of bad
than it actually was.
So they actually have five categories of storms.
And the rhetoric that we're hearing out there is that it's never been this bad.
And that simply isn't true.
It will be a life-changing event for everyone, as some of the people have said, the people who are in the path
of it.
Absolutely.
We've had one 72-year-old man in Deltona, the first known fatality.
He was trying to drain his pool into a canal, and he got swept into the canal and drowned
in that.
But what is interesting to me is the way that they're using this to push, of course, the climate MacGuffin and how really ineffective the GOP has been about this.
They really don't have much that they can say if they're afraid and they are afraid.
If they're afraid to tackle the climate lie, they're at the mercy of these people who have
created it we have this video of um joy behar it's so funny that she's called joy um as i've said
before on the view you have joy and whoopee and there never is any joy or whoopee it's always We are always angry about everything on The View.
And so they were discussing DeSantis.
And you know that this is all his fault because he's a climate denier.
This is very much like what we've seen from many, many people on the left, you know, these pagan idiots who talk about Mother Earth, like Jennifer Lawrence.
She really meant it when she said, Mother Earth is mad at us, sending a hurricane.
It's like, well, it's not any kind of climate change.
It's something that's always been there.
So here is Joyless Behar coming after DeSantis.
This is the quote from Governor DeSantis about climate change.
Quote, I am not in the pews of the church
of the global warming leftists.
It is a religion.
This is what he thinks
about climate change.
And now his state
is getting hit
with one of the worst hurricanes
that I will ever see.
Perhaps.
At LiveScoreBet,
we love Cheltenham
just as much
as we love football.
The excitement,
the roar,
and the chance
to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new
members money back as a free sports bet
up to €10 if your horse loses
on a selected race. That's how
we celebrate the biggest week in
racing. Cheltenham with
LiveScore Bet. This is
total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th
of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market
excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie Blood clots can happen to anyone at any age.
Be particularly vigilant if you are going into hospital,
have active cancer or undergoing cancer treatment,
are pregnant or just had a baby,
are in a leg cast or had a lower limb injury,
are taking the combined oral contraceptive pill or oral HRT. Ask your
doctor for a blood clot risk assessment. Visit thrombosis.ie. She says that he's lacking in
emotional intelligence because Joy thinks with her emotions. I don't even know what emotional
intelligence is and neither does she because she's all emotions and no intelligence.
Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin said, well, this is a moment for DeSantis to show that he's
a leader of all Floridians.
It's not about politics.
She said, focus on helping the people of Florida, the Democrats, the counties who will never
vote for you.
He's smarter than Trump.
I think we all recognize this.
I actually expect to see some competent leadership.
Oh, that set off Joyless.
Joyless Behar said, well, that's not really saying much.
You know, the first time I've agreed with Joyless Behar.
He's smarter than Trump.
That's not saying much.
Let's hope he's more honest than Trump. Sonny Hostin said, that's not saying much, but he is smarter than Trump that's not saying much let's hope he's more honest than Trump
Sonny Hostin said
that's not saying much but he is smarter
Behar said
you know there's such a thing as emotional
intelligence
please explain that to us but she doesn't
she said
and can I
make just this one point
because according to NPR, this is their gold standard of information, NPR, the National Propaganda Radio,
Florida's climate challenges are amongst the biggest in the country.
Hurricanes, intensified by climate change.
Rising seas, extreme heat and drought.
And this one is the worst.
Health threats from mosquito-borne diseases.
And we're going to be talking about that as well, because NPR had an article.
It was just great.
For years, they denied that these demonic maniacs like Bill Gates released a whole bunch of mosquitoes in one of these, I think it was a TED Talk presentation or something.
And he said, yeah, we're going to vaccinate people by mosquitoes.
And then after he said that, and we pointed it out, many people pointed it out.
And it was like, you're just a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists.
It's like he said it.
That's his conspiracy and uh now they've done that for real you know they've they've got some uh tests they they infected uh mosquitoes with malaria and had volunteers come in that
well they gave them uh something that was supposedly a dead or weakened pathogen of
malaria that was genetically modified they put that in the mosquitoes and then they had the
mosquitoes bite these volunteers we'll talk about that coming up and to see if the vaccine worked
and they actually gave them a challenge test too which ethically you're not supposed to be able to do. I mean, there's just so many things going on with it.
But when NPR reported it, it was, oh, well, this is great.
Oh, this is going to be great.
And so, yeah, NPR is her trusted source.
Rising sea levels, extreme heat and drought.
And this one is the worst of the hurricanes.
And then there's going to be mosquito-borne disease.
But it'll be the genetic code injections given to you by mosquitoes.
They don't want you opting out of this stuff.
So she said, this is the quote from Governor DeSantis about climate change.
I'm not in the pews of the church or global warming leftists.
This is what he thinks about climate change.
And now his state's getting hurt.
See mother earth.
Uh, she said he's getting hit with one of the worst hurricanes we will ever see.
And you can say this if you are all about emotional intelligence, right?
You look at the devastation there in Fort Myers, and it's like, wow, that's horrible.
But it's not the worst damage that has ever been done by a hurricane.
You know, they have five categories of hurricanes.
Guess what?
Category five is the highest one.
This was not a category five.
There have been a lot of other hurricanes, a lot of them, over the last century.
A lot of Category 5 hurricanes.
There's this viral article.
Somebody went out and said, well, here's the five worst hurricanes.
Well, no.
There's been a slew of Category 5 hurricanes over the last century.
I've got the breakdown by decade here coming up.
And it's kind of interesting.
Going back to the 1920s.
So this is not the worst hurricane ever, not by a long shot.
This had 150 mile an hour winds.
A lot of the Category 5s, Category 5 is 155 miles per hour or more.
A lot of the Category 5s have had 175, 180, 190 mile per hour winds.
Anyway, so why do these categories exist?
Well, because we've had hurricanes like that in the past.
This is not something new.
This is climate, Florida style.
Hurricanes are a part of that climate.
It just comes with the territory.
It's
still horrific when it happens. It's not to
minimize it, but you can't use it for
their agenda, which they're going to try to do.
And of course, DeSantis'
opponent, Charlie Crist,
there were hurricanes
on his watch when he was governor.
Now he's running against DeSantis.
DeSantis and the DeSantis campaign put out a clip from him a few months ago
where he was calling DeSantis Satan and calling himself Christ.
Now that's going to win him the evangelical vote.
There you go.
He said when he was doing interview, he said, you listed earlier in your broadcast the five
major storms that are hitting the U.S.
Three of the five have hit Florida.
So one factor in all this is climate change.
Well, what changed?
This is not a category five.
And three of the five that hit were a while back, many of them decades back, 60s typically.
The storms are getting bigger.
They're getting stronger.
No, they're not at all.
So here's the information, okay?
You can look this up yourself.
In the 1920s, there were two Category 5 hurricanes.
In the 1930s, six.
Then in the 1940s, it dropped to one.
In the 1950s, there were only two in the entire decade.
In the 1960s, it went back up again to five.
Then in the 1970s, and 1960s is when I was there.
I remember it as a kid.
In the 1970s, it went down to three.
1980 stayed at three. 1990s, it was a kid 1970s it went down to three 1980 stayed at three 1990s it was two in the decade
of the 2000s it went up to eight then it went back down to six in 2010 and the 2010s the teens
the last category five we've had was 2019. Interesting, isn't it, that they don't think that it is unusual or climate change,
the fact that we haven't had any hurricanes this year?
It's notable for the lack of hurricanes this year.
And not having a Category 5 yet.
Hope they don't.
But these people will take anything that looks scary and try to use it to scare you.
Now, this is scary.
I saw this picture on social media.
This is Tampa Bay.
And I know Tampa Bay.
And I looked at this and was like, whoa, look at that.
All the water is drained out.
The hurricane is pulling all the water out because it's going to throw it back at the land again.
But it drained all that out.
Look at how dry that is.
And then listen to the way this person, one of the people who put this up commented.
He says, for the, quote, this phenomenon has nothing to do with climate change, quote unquote, crowd.
It's tragic that you still exist.
Yes, it has to do with climate change, which is making hurricanes
stronger and more frequent. Neither of those are true.
This is the only hurricane we've had this year. It was notable that we hadn't had any
hurricanes. And this is not a class 5.
Imagine you put the energy that you put into denying science into solving
this crisis.
Well, because all that's necessary is that we give them everything in our life, give
them all our money, give them all of our freedom, remove the rule of law, create a global government,
global taxes for this imagined problem of unicorn farts everywhere.
This is the kind of deranged fear-mongering that you're seeing from people who have emotional intelligence.
It's so emotional.
They look at that, and it is.
That is a visceral picture to look at the Bay.
But it has absolutely nothing to do with anything else.
Like I said, two and a half million people out of power.
They should be celebrating that.5 million people out of power. They should be celebrating that.
They want everybody out of power.
They want to shut down all of the power plants
at the same time they tell everybody,
all right, you're not going to have anything that runs on anything but electricity.
Everybody's going to be on the grid,
and then we're going to shut down all the power on the grid.
So I tweeted that out.
I said it's always been a part of the climate in Florida, and it has.
All right, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back,
we're going to take a look at what is happening with the pipe bomb saga.
There's been yet another detected explosion in that,
and we'll talk about the consequences of that.
And as more and more people are talking about the who done it.
Uh, as I said yesterday, what it really tells you as we look at all this stuff,
um, is that every one of these people is like murder on the Orient Express,
Orient Express, where you find out that all the suspects who had all of them
had motive and opportunity, and it turns out they all took a turn.
At a stabbing the one at live score bet.
We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a
free sports bet up to 10 Euro.
If your horse loses on a selected race, that's how we celebrate
the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.
Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie
Blood clots can happen to anyone at any age.
Be particularly vigilant if you are going into hospital, have active cancer or undergoing cancer treatment, are pregnant or just had a baby, are in a leg cast or had a lower limb injury,
are taking the combined oral contraceptive pill or oral HRT. Ask your doctor for a blood clot
risk assessment. Visit thrombosis.ie. the one that they killed. We'll be right back.
The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past
to track and control us.
Their commons project
to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful
weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while
they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find
at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com. I'm out. I guess I'll just take your glasses.
Yeah, well, I guess they took his glasses and they took him away as well.
We have the first transgender officer.
This is Jamie in disguise. glasses and they took him away as well we have the first transgender officer now this is jamie
in disguise uh indicted for allegedly conspiring to aid russia okay um and and he's got a wife who
appears to be a real female and the two of them she was the one who was really pushing him she was the russian
patriot uh identifying with him the wife of the u.s army's first trans officer told her and see
here's where it gets confusing uh told him well yeah and and here's the name his his name is major
jamie lee henry so if we call him hen, I think we'll understand what's going on here.
We can get the genders sorted out, even though he can't sort it out.
So his wife told Henry to stop being a coward, get out of that dress,
and to overlook ethical issues when the couple tried to hand over medical records
of senior military officers and their families
to the Russian government. Now, I find this to be as interesting as the transgender angle.
The fact that they're handing over medical records of senior officers, and this is at
Fort Bragg, where special forces are, Delta Force, Spec Ops, and things like that. I was like, oh, well. So, Russia wants information
on these people. What's the purpose of that? Why would you want to have the medical records of
select military personnel, high-ranking officers, special forces, that type of thing?
Are they, and their families, and their families. So, is this to create some kind of a bioweapon that is DNA specific?
You see, we know that China is doing that.
This is why these data leaks out of the Pentagon and things like that are so dangerous because we know that they're doing it.
And we also know that the U.S. is doing it, even though the U.S. doesn't admit it.
And we also know that Russia is trying to. They're all trying to do it.
So they're all trying to get specific DNA information on key military components,
opponents, so that they can attack them. Now, it turns out that she was not really working for Russia.
She was working for the FBI.
The FBI was running this whole thing.
She thought it was somebody in Russia.
And so these are the people that they catch,
the people that they offer the enticement to that take it up.
But, you know, there's probably some people out there that really are
grabbing the medical records, or they at least want to try to get the medical records.
And I imagine that even if Russia or China were not trying to do that,
the FBI looks at this and say, well, you know,
we're working on these DNA specific bioweapons.
The other guys probably are as well.
So that would mean that if they're working on these weapons, they've got to have the information.
So let's set up a sting where we this is the way they operate.
It's the base's hospital.
Again, where special forces are. The couple had communicated and met with an undercover FBI agent
who they believed was from the Russian embassy
in order to deliver files that the Kremlin could exploit.
Gabriellian said that she was motivated by her patriotism to Russia.
She said, my point of view is that until the United States
actually declares war against Russia,
I'm able to help them as much as I want.
Henry, the guy, the transgender guy, allegedly told the undercover agent when they met to set up the deal in August.
He said, that's what he said, rather.
She didn't say that.
He said, my view is that until they declare war, I can do what I want.
He says, at that point, then I'll have some ethical issues that I want to work through.
And then his wife allegedly replied, you'll work through those ethical issues.
And then adding that he was a coward over fear of breaking HIPAA rules.
Well, I think HIPAA is pretty much dead after all the stuff that we've gone through the last
couple of years. Henry explained to the undercover agent that he was committed to assisting Russia
and had looked into volunteering to join the Russian army, but they told him they didn't
want people wearing a dress. No, they didn't. He didn't get that far. They're looking for men,
actually. Did you notice that? I mean, they're certainly not looking for transgender women.
They're looking for men. They want a few real men.
And so that's why the men are trying to get on planes and the men are trying
to go across the border because the Russians want to fight their war with men.
Anyway, just kind of old school
traditional that way. That's one of the reasons
that we should be concerned about this they they take it seriously anyway um so he looked
into volunteering to join the russian army after the conflict in ukraine began but russia wanted
people with combat experience um not high heels. Henry further stated, quote,
the way I am viewing what is going on in Ukraine now
is that the U.S. is using Ukrainians as a proxy
for their own hatred towards Russia.
Well, he got that part of it right.
Babylon Bee covers it.
They say a Russian spy was awarded
the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Biden
for being the first openly transgender trader. Biden awarded him with a Presidential Medal of
Freedom for being the first ever transgender trader to America. He said, we've had guys like
Aaron Burr and Benedict Arnold. He's a great guy, by the way. I know his daughter. But we've never had a traitor who identified as transgender.
This is historic. It's not every day that you get sold out to the Russians
by a dude in a dress. He said, how about that?
Well, to get to the serious
side of this, there's been a fourth leak in the pipeline
is the way they put it i love that
they keep calling it leaks it's not a leak if you know it's like you put a a mine on the side of a
of a ship and blow out the side of it do you call that a leak that's what is happening here now this
is actually uh they've got pictures of it looks very much like the other ones where it's got this big bubbling cauldron there as the gas is pouring out of it.
It is hundreds of feet wide.
But it was so small in comparison to the other ones that they hadn't noticed it yet.
So they don't know if it just happened or if it was there for a while because the other ones are so much bigger.
I don't know how big they are, if this one is hundreds of feet wide.
But we're talking about the ocean.
So they said it increases fear that damage to the multi-billion pound pipelines may not be reparable. Well, I think the whole purpose of this is to make it clear that if you try to fix this,
we're just going to keep blowing it up.
There's no way that you can defend it.
I think that's the purpose.
It's to send a signal that repairs will not be allowed.
And nobody's even talking about doing any repairs, certainly not in the amount of time
that it needs to be done.
This new hole is said to be leaking gas seen from the surface of the sea,
disturbance hundreds of feet wide.
They said it was not visible on radar because it is smaller than the other ones.
And they had experts and government officials have blamed the deliberate sabotage for the leaks with Ursula von der Leyen saying any deliberate disruption of active European energy infrastructure
is unacceptable. Wait a minute. Isn't she the one that was doing that with sanctions and all the
rest of this stuff? Didn't they do that with their green agenda and their climate scare,
their climate MacGuffin? Didn't they do all that? And that really is the issue.
You see, the Russians, with this pipeline being blown up,
the Russians aren't going to freeze. The Russians aren't going to pay more for gas
heat. It's going to be the Europeans who will.
The attack really was on Europe, if you stop and think about it. That doesn't mean
that Russia did it,
because our own governments are at war with us everywhere.
And we can see that.
We can see that the sanctions, which are an act of war,
are really targeting their own citizens.
And you've had some politicians,
especially in Italy in the run-up to that election,
Matteo Salvini said,
is this a battle tactic where you harm your own people more than you do the enemy?
Because the Russian government is not being harmed by this at all.
The Russian government is getting a windfall profit from this.
The Russian people are suffering, but not as much as the Europeans are
and are going to with all of this.
So as we look at whodunit, like I said yesterday,
all of these people who are suspects, it is like murder on the Orient Express.
So they all go in and take a turn at stabbing their own people.
And what it tells us is that every one of them has a motive,
whether you're talking about the U.S., Russia, Ukraine, Poland, even Germany.
They all want to have this happen, and they all want to have a war for a great reset.
They don't want to pull back.
And so we had Fox News' Jennifer Griffin.
This is a good story.
It's on information liberation.
She did a piece, and she went on Fox News and also on Twitter,
said there is no evidence that the U.S. was involved in Nord Stream 2 explosion.
What does she base that on? Well,
because she asked the Pentagon and they told her, I did this with a Jake Tapper when he talked about Sam Hyde being the shooter
in one of these things, right?
And that's the running joke that whenever there was a shooting,
they would always say Sam Hyde in some form or the other.
They eventually got Adam Kinzinger when they said the ghost of Kiev,
you know, it was Samuel.
And they changed his name to kind of sound a little bit more like he was from Ukraine.
And Adam Kinzinger said, Godspeed, Sam Hyde, go for it.
And it was made up. Well, they owned Jake Tapper
the same way with one of these shootings.
It was a Democrat congressman who first got owned by it.
Somebody saw on social media
that it was Sam Hyde. The same thing happened to Louie Gohmert.
He was the one who reported after the election that,
uh,
uh,
Trump had sent in special forces to overtake some facility in Germany where
they were running the election scam,
all of it,
nonsense.
Somebody put it out on social media.
Louie Gohmert picked it up.
He's a Congressman.
So therefore it's true.
Uh,
well,
same thing was done with this with a Democrat congressman.
And so I tweeted at Jake Tapper about how he got pwned by all of that.
And he replied and he said, we had a source who is a U.S. congressman.
I said, yeah, that's right.
That's how you do journalism, isn't it?
Whatever the government tells you, you run with it.
And then he blocked me.
So end of discussion.
Regime media propagandist Jennifer Griffin, says Information Liberation,
who just recently signed a new multi-year deal with fox news reported
uh yeah winston that there quote is no evidence or indication that the us was involved in any way
with nordstrom 2 pipeline explosion because the pentagon told her they had nothing to do with it
she said my question the pentagon briefing today was can you rule out that the U.S. was involved?
A senior military official said, yeah, we were absolutely not involved.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie
Blood clots can happen to anyone at any age.
Be particularly vigilant if you are going into hospital, have active cancer, or undergoing cancer treatment,
are pregnant, or just had a baby, are in a leg cast or had a lower limb injury,
are taking the combined oral contraceptive pill or oral HRT.
Ask your doctor for a blood clot risk assessment.
Visit thrombosis.ie.
Cross my fingers.
And as information liberation,
Chris Minahan says,
yeah, this is what journalism is like
at Fox News.
Earlier this year, by the way,
she has a history of this,
and he did a great job
of going through her history.
She was the one who put out the debunked hoax that
russia had bombed the babi yer holocaust memorial in ukraine and the person who debunked that
was an israeli journalist who after she put out the story jennifer griffin at fox news
he goes by and says no it hasn't been't been hit. Here it is. I'm standing here. It's fine.
She never retracted or corrected the story either. She also ran with fake news stories
with video showing that Russia was using mobile crematoriums to evaporate the war dead. Remember that one? And, of course, that was video from 2013,
and it wasn't about that anyway.
She never retracted or corrected that story either.
When news came out about U.S. biolabs in Ukraine,
Jennifer Griffin also simply repeated the Pentagon talking points
to dismiss the story as a nothing burger.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, here's something that's definitely, the Pentagon says that they're, and Fauci,
just talk to Fauci, we're going to get to that.
Now, Fauci is the head of our bioweapon stuff.
Put in there by Dick Cheney.
Oh, okay.
Birds of a feather.
Isn't it interesting? You know, Fauci has friends on both the left and the right.
You know, he is truly a bipartisan guy.
And, you know, he oils politicians both sides.
But the ones that he gets everything from are the Republicans.
You know, Ronald Reagan, the Bushes, Cheney, Trump.
It's all the Republicans who just give him the store,
even though he's a close confidant of the Democrats.
Isn't that interesting?
But back to Jennifer Griffin.
Jennifer, said the Fox News media CEO, Suzanne Scott.
She said, Jennifer is one of the industry's premier journalists
and has proven to be an indispensable asset on a consequential beat
with unrivaled experience spanning more than three decades in multiple war zones.
Yeah, she just does and repeats whatever.
She does whatever they tell her to do.
She repeats whatever they give her.
What was it that the CIA called that?
Oh, yeah, Mockingbird, Operation Mockingbird.
You think that's over? You think that's something
that is only on mainstream, you know, the ABC, CBS,
and NBC? No, it's CNN, and it's also Fox News as well.
As a matter of fact, they had a security, cyber
security, kind of the spy beat
reporter, Catherine Herridge was there before. And she's moved on
to another network because she just wasn't happy with her salary. She got into a salary dispute
with them. They were paying at the time, Megyn Kelly was making, I don't know, $25 million or
something like that. Catherine Herridge was livid that she was only making $900,000.
She's got to have at least seven figures, maybe eight in her salary.
So she just thought she was underappreciated because she's carrying a lot of water for
the CIA.
That's important when you go out and cover up things like that. I remember watching and reporting on one of her discussions that she had on Fox News.
They had her on as the intelligence and cybersecurity expert.
And she started talking about how we were at danger from things like Stutznet.
She said, you remember that?
And that's really, they could do that to us again it's like wait a minute that was put together by israeli intelligence and u.s intelligence and
they they uh put that out uh and they released that on the iranians to uh chew up their computers
when they were working on the nuclear stuff that was admitted admitted that it was the Americans and the Israelis.
They didn't even try to hide it.
These are the kind of reporters that they have at Fox News.
You have Russian foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova
asked Biden directly if he'd carried out this threat.
And I guess he told her to watch Fox News. But what she said was,
when an emergency, she doesn't just talk about the clips that I played the other day. As a matter of
fact, I've got it still here. Let me play that again. The Biden pipe bomb clip. Let me answer
the first question first. If Germany, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it. But how will you do that exactly since the project and control of the project is within
Germany's control? We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it.
Okay, well, you know, that's Biden. He says stupid stuff. But, you know, Victoria Nuland said this.
With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have very strong and clear conversations with our German allies.
And I want to be clear with you today.
If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.
Yeah, one way or the other.
And so she didn't even reference those clips,
what the Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman said.
She said, U.S. President Joe Biden must answer the question
of whether the U.S. carried out its threat on September 25th and 26th
when an emergency was reported at three lines of Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2,
which has been preliminarily recognized as ruptures,
whereas he suggested immediately that they were blown up.
And I thought that was interesting because when I talked about it,
I said I think one of the most interesting things about this whole episode was I was watching it unfold in the afternoon.
And, you know, people were saying, well, there's a rupture there.
And then there's another one.
You know, I said it was very much like what we heard on 9-11.
And then they realized that it was blown up, that it wasn't an accident. But he then they realized that it was blown up,
that it wasn't an accident.
But he said right away that it was blown up.
Okay, well, that's kind of interesting.
His statement of intent that he'd made back in February was backed up with a promise.
One must be responsible for one's words.
Failures to understand what one says does not absolve anyone of responsibility.
Europe must know the truth, she said.
Well, I think we do.
Technical experts say the pipelines will become harder to repair
once all the gas has escaped and they fill with seawater and start to corrode.
And that's an interesting thing because, you know,
they just discovered this fourth leak because it's a tremendous amount of gas
there in those pipelines that is coming out.
And I mean, these are big areas, the small one that they couldn't even see with radar,
several hundred feet across. And so just think about the quantity of gas that that represents
and the amount of money that that represents, as well as the investment in this. But of course,
they are going to fill with seawater and
they are going to corrode because nobody is doing anything to stop any of it and uh so tucker
carlson when he talked about it he said this will be an historic act of environmental terrorism this is what first went up on on breitbart um and you see who done it and they say nordstream
leak mystery then the next uh and they have like you know four different headlines there in
different colors pipeline still filled with methane immeasurable environmental impact
and then no gas this winter so the first couple of things are who did the demolition,
then the environmental consequences,
then the economic consequences.
But you know,
folks,
we got to stop with this environmental terrorism.
It's methane.
It's not a problem.
It's not going to destroy the environment.
This is not like a,
an oil tanker.
That's going to kill a lot of fish and wildlife.
This is methane. It's going to bubble up lot of fish and wildlife this is methane it's going to bubble
up and go up into the air disappear oh but it'll create greenhouse warming and all that no that's
nonsense i can't believe to me you know for this is why i say we can't defeat this if the people
even somebody like tucker carlson is going to go along with this,
if they're going to go along with this, uh, you know, CO2 and methane are going to kill the planet.
Uh, just so they can blame the Democrats.
He knows better.
Come on.
Yeah.
Tucker's not a fool, but he'll use this to blame environmental terrorism.
And he says, and now it means that, um, you know,
the U S is directly at war.
And I don't think so.
I think they're going to wind up using Ukraine for plausible deniability,
even though I really think it is coming from the U S now kit nightly out of,
uh,
the UK on off guardian.
He says,
forget about the blame game.
Forget about who done it.
He said,
the Nord stream sabotage is about the Great Reset and nothing else.
Well, I agree with him, except that you understand that World War III is also about the Great Reset, isn't it?
And that is really what is fundamentally here.
Both of those things are about the Great Reset.
He said, people will freeze, starve, and probably die this winter.
That has always been a part of the plan.
So what reason is there to think that this quote-unquote attack
is anything but more of the same?
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. of the same. racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet
responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Blood clots can happen to anyone at any age. Be particularly
vigilant if you are going into hospital, have active cancer or undergoing cancer treatment,
are pregnant or just had a baby, are in a leg cast or had a lower limb injury,
are taking the combined oral contraceptive pill or oral HRT. Ask your doctor for a blood clot
risk assessment. Visit thrombosis.ie. He said, the same sabotage that we've been seeing
for two years. He says, yeah, this is definitely an act of sabotage. They've been sabotaging us for two years, for 930 days.
All of these things have been an act of sabotage,
and Kit Knightley understands that.
He's talked about the lockdowns and the mandates to push a global ID,
the universal basic income, all the rest of the stuff is deliberate sabotage.
He said, the sabotage of our entire way of life by people who would profit both monetarily and politically
from a sea change in the way our society is structured.
That's what I've said all along.
I said, every one of our countries,
every country, regardless of what their political, their stated political
ideologies are or what their political party is or what they have said.
You think they're conservative?
You think they're liberal?
I mean, look at Alberta, Canada.
You know, one of the worst places in terms of a lockdown.
But it doesn't matter whether it's Jason Kenney or there's Justin Trudeau.
It doesn't matter if it's Donald Trump, who is the ultimate anti-globalist, we were always told, right?
He was the one who did the most to push this, which tells you everything.
You take the guy who was the poster child to fight the globalist, and what did he do?
He created the vaccine.
He did everything that they wanted.
And so I've been saying that they're at war with all,
every one of these leaders are at war with their own people.
And they want to have a civil war.
They want a revolution.
And they want world war at the same time.
And that's what the last three, fourth turnings have all been about.
As a matter of fact,
Julian Assange, when he was talking about these, had an interesting observation about this,
you know, the wars that they get us into and whether or not these people are serious about it or whether or not it is a game of professional wrestling where you have heels and heroes.
Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan.
The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States,
out of the tax bases of European countries, through Afghanistan,
and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance.
That is the goal, i.e. the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.
Yeah.
You tell the truth like that, and everybody, all these people, including Trump, want to
kill you.
It's just the, yeah.
Why do I call him Benedict Donald?
Because Assange, for example, released true information about Hillary Clinton that helped to get Donald Trump elected.
And he said, well, we know that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger and a criminal.
We don't know about Donald Trump.
We'll see.
But I'm certainly opposed to her.
Told the truth about her.
Trump didn't really have any background.
That was what was so convenient about him politically.
But now we know that Trump is just like Hillary Clinton.
Yeah, has different friends and is going to attack and has different enemies.
But in terms of what they want, on the same page, really.
Conservative AFD, the party in Germany, now the strongest party in Eastern Germany,
and it rises to 15% nationally.
Now, that may not sound like much, but because they have a multi-party democracy,
unlike the United States, these European countries, they allow a lot of
different parties. And so you usually don't have one party that gets more than 50%. As a matter of
fact, the party that is in government, that is leading right now, Chancellor Olaf Scholz's party,
the Social Democrat Party, has 18% nationwide.
And they're the ruling party.
So these people are right behind them at 15%. And as a matter of fact, it's much higher in Eastern Germany.
Why is it higher in Eastern Germany?
Well, these people are poorer than the ones who lived in Western Germany
because they lived under communism.
And so they are feeling all of this forced, planned austerity more than the people in
West Germany are.
One of the greatest concerns in Eastern Germany, which is driving popular support of AFD, is
the current economic crisis, with inflation hitting East Germans
far harder than those in the West of Germany
due to the already lower incomes and poverty rates seen in the East.
These people have been made poor by the communists,
and now they're being made poor by the climate change lunacy as well.
And as the pipeline was being blown up, you had AFD running protests and
making big gains by demanding that the current ruling party and Chancellor Olaf Scholz open up
the pipeline. You know, he was keeping it closed on his end. It wasn't on the Russian end that it was closed.
Now they had closed Nord Stream 1,
and they might have used it as a leverage, as a weapon,
but now that weapon has been taken out of their hands.
That's one of the reasons why I don't think they did it.
And it was a pressure on the German chancellor,
and now that pressure has gone.
So there is perhaps a bright spot, although I
don't think there's any substance to it. Russia is mulling a face-to-face nuclear arms treaty talks
with the U.S. I think that's just posturing. I think they want to put that out there so that the
U.S. is the one that is refusing to come to the table. Putin today is going to have,
he's already had a major speech
about annexing these different areas of Ukraine.
He's going to continue that today.
I'm going to take a...
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money
back as a free sports bet up to 10
euro if your horse loses on a selected
race. That's how we celebrate
the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore
Bet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within
48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and
place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18ibly 18 plus gambling care.e quick break clear my throat
and i'll be right back stay with us Thank you. you're listening to the David Knight show.
Well,
I want to thank Patrick S on a rock fan and Angus Mustang. Thank you both of you for the tips.
I appreciate that.
And,
um,
Angus writes,
uh,
night,
Arden,
2024,
Charlie Robinson and,
uh,
Billy Ray Valentine,
Donald Jeffries and guard goldsmith for cabinet positions.
Well, we would probably wouldn't Guard Goldsmith for cabinet positions.
Well, we would probably wouldn't last as long as Flynn did.
If they didn't kill us, they would invent something to take us out, I'm sure.
But yeah, there are important things that we can do at the local level,
and I think a key thing is for people just to understand how they're being deceived i want to talk a little bit about the pharmaceutical stuff and i want to talk about what's going on with fauci anthony fascist has been at the center of
this stuff for the longest amount of time put in there by dick cheney you paying attention democrats
i know how much democrats hate dick cheney uh i hate him as well. But Fauci is his guy.
Fauci is his guy.
We're going to talk about that.
But before we do, I want to play a clip for you of a nurse who was fired.
She said, I'm going to play what she had to say. But after she made the speech,
she did an interview with San Diego's KUSI,
or I think it is TV.
And she said the speech that she gave to the board
earlier this month was not the one
that she had originally intended to do.
She said that she was prepared to address
the board's allocation of funds for COVID testing.
She said, but when I got up there, I was just explaining who I was.
And she said, and then I realized I'm not a nurse anymore. And I don't take care of these children
anymore. And that's then the speech that I ended up giving. So you're going to see that she's brought to tears
because she wanted to talk about the issue here.
But as she's talking, she thinks about the children that she had helped,
the children who had myocarditis nearly died.
As a reaction of the vaccine, they had myocarditis.
Here's what she had to say.
Ms. Tony Bittner, I came before you guys a year ago.
I'm a nurse, or at least I was at Rady Children's
in the cardiovascular intensive care unit
until Nathan and his misinformation pandemic
caused me to lose my job.
I took care of those children who came in with myocarditis
after the vaccine.
And I talked to the doctors because I was a charge nurse
saying, why aren't we reporting these to VAERS?
Who is going to report these to VAERS?
It was an unspoken thing that we were not allowed to talk about openly on the unit.
I've worked for 13 years in this community,
taking care of some of the sickest patients.
The day before I was taken away from my position,
I was actively giving compressions to a child, pushing calcium into his veins to keep him alive.
And we did.
And he went home. And yet, I was ridiculed by those who were supposed to be my colleagues and my friends.
I am the face of your misinformation campaign, Nathan.
I am the one who lost my career in pediatric cardiovascular ICU care.
I took care of children who had COVID.
I never got COVID in the hospital.
I tested twice a week.
I wore my PPE because I loved my job.
And I love this community.
Thank you.
She played along with him as much as she could.
But she said she was ridiculed, she was ostracized.
Why aren't we reporting what's happening to these kids?
She saw the kids, children, given heart attacks by the vaccine.
Not going to report it.
She said, you call that misinformation.
You fired me because I wouldn't poison myself.
So we have an NIH-funded study that just vaccinated a human
using genetically modified mosquitoes.
Yes, that's exactly what they did.
We use mosquitoes like they're a thousand small flying syringes.
This has been Bill Gates' dream, our nightmare,
that we would not be able to refuse this,
that they would unleash this horror,
these genetic code injections on everybody
without your consent.
And no refusal.
A box of genetically modified mosquitoes successfully vaccinated a human against malaria in a trial
funded by the National Institute of Health.
There you go.
Bill Gates and Anthony Fascist together again.
Our Joseph Mingala.
The study involved about 200 hungry mosquitoes biting a human subject's arm.
Human participants placed their arms directly over a small box full of the blood suckers.
We use mosquitoes like they're a thousand small flying syringes, they said.
Three to five vaccinations took place over a 30-day interval.
There is a picture of the arm of one of these volunteers that is just amazing.
I mean, it is solid red welts on it.
And the only good news is that at this point it didn't work too well.
And I'd have to say that if it takes that many mosquito bites and you got to go through that
three to five times, I mean, you know, I think we could probably defeat that. Nevertheless, they said that the mosquitoes gave minor versions of malaria
that didn't make the people sick, but gave them antibodies.
Efficacy from the antibodies lasted a few months, they say.
Again, this is not what they've always defined immunity as, right?
They redefined immunity. They redefined natural immunity to make it secondary and subservient and inferior to
vaccine immunity.
And then they defined vaccine immunity as the presence of antibodies, not protection
against the disease.
And so they've also redefined vaccines to include mRNA genetic reprogramming.
None of these things were there before this last year.
They've been changing all of these definitions.
And so NPR had the story, and NPR talked to one of the volunteers,
Carolina Reed, one of the 26 participants in the study.
She said, my whole forearm swelled and blistered.
My family was laughing, asking like,
why are you subjecting yourself to this?
She enjoyed her experience so much, however,
that she says she wants to participate
in as many vaccine trials as she can.
And for this, she was paid $4,100 as an incentive. When Karen and I had our video
stories back in the 1980s, early 90s, we had an employee who signed up to be a human guinea
pig for some of these vaccine drops because in Research Triangle Park there, they had
Burroughs Wellcome and some other companies there that were doing research. Uh, and, um, she signed up for this and we were all telling her, are you crazy?
Why would you do this? I, it's the most amazing thing to me. It's one of the reasons why when
you look at this and you say people are dragging their kids in and injecting them with all kinds
of stuff or which they have no risk, you know?
Well, there's a lot of people who just sign up for this stuff.
$4,100 is what she's willing to do.
The doctor who was doing the research said this is a total game changer.
Dr. Kristen Leike, L-Y-K-E,
led the phase one trials for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine and was a co-investigator for Moderna and for the Novavax vaccines.
Researchers say the genetically modified mosquitoes will not be used at large to vaccinate millions of people.
Yeah, right.
They said the reason they use these instead of syringes was because of cost.
No, they want to come up with a system.
This is what Bill Gates has been talking about for quite some time, that you can't opt out of.
The headline, by the way, on NPR says, yeah, a box of 200 mosquitoes did the
vaccinating in this malaria trial. And that's not a joke. It's not a conspiracy
theory anymore, because now NPR says so.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the the roar and the chance
to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free
sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest
week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march
bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
So now you've got to believe it.
I mean, even when Bill Gates was saying it,
you weren't supposed to believe it because it was too early then.
But now they're closing in on this.
She said the way that it worked was she put her arm over a cardboard box
filled with 200 mosquitoes.
It was covered with a mesh that keeps them in,
but still lets them bite through the mesh.
I remember the old commercials that we have for off.
And you remember that?
Well, here we have this volunteer.
And so he sticks his arm into this um
like glass aquarium so you can see what's going on and you see the mosquitoes just
swarming around and and getting on his arm you know and he's trying to shake him off and
uh but then he sprays his arm his other arm i guess with uh with off and he sticks it in
it's like they don't bite they don't even light you know they don't bite. They don't even light.
You know, they don't even land on his arm,
let alone bite on his arm.
Well, these did.
She said they even covered her arm with black cloth
because mosquitoes like to bite at night.
And then the feeding frenzy began, says NPR.
Isn't this great?
The insects deliver live malaria,
causing plasmodium parasites
that have been genetically modified to not get people sick.
The body still makes antibodies against the weakened parasite,
so it's prepared to fight the real thing.
Well, that's the way vaccines have typically worked.
I mean, you create a dead or weakened pathogen in this particular case.
Somehow, even though this parasite that gives people malaria was somehow weakened, they say, it was still alive.
The parasites mature inside the mosquitoes.
So at this point of the concept stage, as the early stage trials are called, It makes sense to use them for delivery.
They said the small trial of 26 participants did show that the modified parasites
protected some participants
from a malarial infection for a few months.
Well, actually it didn't.
And that's the key thing.
It didn't help that's the key thing uh it didn't you know it didn't help that many of them so uh the
of the 14 participants who were exposed to malaria seven of them including reed came down with the
disease uh and so she actually got malaria now she did not get it from the weakened parasites, weakened pathogens.
Instead, what they did was a challenge test, which is truly interesting.
They took these, it was a couple of dozen people, and then they took a subset of them, 14,
and they actually exposed them to malaria.
And half of them got malaria.
They said countries try to curb malaria with mosquito netting,
with insecticide spray, with anti-malarial drugs,
and even by releasing genetically modified mosquitoes
that can't bite or lay eggs,
hoping that once they breed with the other mosquitoes,
that that'll reduce the population.
So when they talk with the other mosquitoes, that that'll reduce the population, right?
So when they talk about genetically modifying mosquitoes, they're trying to sterilize them so that when they mate, there's no offspring.
You know, kind of what they're doing to us with the Trump shots.
That's what they're doing to us with the Trump shots.
They had genetically modified mosquitoes who could not reproduce because of their modifications, and that's what they're trying to do to everybody with the Trump shots. They had genetically modified mosquitoes who could not reproduce because of their modifications, and that's what they're trying to do to everybody with the Trump
shots. But they go through all these measures, right? Why do you do that if malaria is not a
serious disease? And it is a serious disease. People who survive it will frequently have relapses. I know through Karen's brother, somebody who got it,
and she would have relapses the rest of her life.
And this has been the case.
People who get it and recover will typically have relapses.
So they said there's 240 million cases of malaria a year,
over 600,000 deaths. I
mean, didn't we just lock down the entire planet way before we got the 600,000 deaths? As a matter
of fact, we did the lockdown. Trump did the lockdown before we had any deaths. And so this
is 600,000 deaths. They said, this is why vaccines are needed. So if you've got something that is this lethal,
then how is it allowed for you to do a challenge test? Now, this goes back to the fact that Fauci
and Pfizer knew from the very beginning that they were just blowing smoke when they said
that these vaccines were, remember remember first it was 90% effective
and then Russia comes out, you know, Pfizer said that on the Monday after the election.
And then the next day, Russia comes out and says, ours is 92% effective.
And then a week later, the following Monday, you had Moderna come out and said, ours is
94% effective.
And the very next day, Pfizer came out and said, ours is 94% effective. And the very next day Pfizer came out and said, ours is 94.5%
effective. So these numbers are meaningless. And you had, and I talked about it at the time,
I said, I talked about it in the context of people understanding what is supposed to happen with
these phase one, two, three tests and how it is different for a vaccine than it is for a therapeutic.
You know, you have your animal tests that you do, and then you go to phase one test,
a very small group of people, usually prisoners that volunteer for this type of stuff.
And you look to see if it's safe.
And if it doesn't kill them, then with phase two,
you bring in people. If it's the therapeutic,
you bring in people who are already have the disease.
And then you evaluate it with a larger group of people that you've already with a smaller group of people, you've looked at the toxicity of this thing.
So, all right, they survived.
So now we're going to bring in some people who actually have the disease and
we're going to expose them to this to see if they get better and if it's effective and if it's safe for the larger group of people.
And then they repeat that process with even more people with phase three.
That's why it takes a decade to do this type of stuff.
But with a vaccine, it's a little bit different.
And that's why with a vaccine, it's even more important to have time.
Because when you're doing it with a therapeutic you're doing it with people
who already have the disease or the condition but with a vaccine what you're going to do is you're
going to have your two groups of people and you're going to have them circulate in the general
population for an extended period of time for years and then you're going to go back and look
to see what percentage of the control group that had no vaccine versus the
control group that had the vaccine. You're going to look at how that compares between the two and
try to make a decision as to whether or not this thing worked or how effective it was.
And so when you don't have that time for them to circulate around, there's no way to evaluate the
efficacy. So they changed the standards and they said, well, it's not going to be whether it trains your immune system to protect you.
Because that's what a vaccine is supposed to do.
It's your immune system.
It's not the vaccine doing any protection at all.
The vaccine is just there to train your immune system.
So we're going to not evaluate whether or not your immune system is effectively trained.
We're just going to look for particular antibodies
that we think are the kind of antibodies that you need
in order to stop this.
And so that's how they changed the definition of it.
But all through this, you had a group of volunteers
because everybody was scared to death of COVID.
They had a bunch of young volunteers who said,
we will volunteer for a challenge test.
And they had press releases.
They put together their organization to try to pressure Fauci and his boss, Francis Collins, to do that.
They would not even reply to these people.
And you had their surrogates in the media explain, well, we can't do challenge tests.
That would violate the Nuremberg Code.
Now, you know why they didn't do it?
Because it would have shown people that it wasn't effective. Here they did a challenge test, which does violate the ethical standards
and the legal standards as well.
If you've got something that is, because here's one of the parts of the Nuremberg Code they put in there.
They said if it is a potentially fatal disease, serious disease,
then you're not going to be allowed to experiment on people
even if they volunteer, even if they say,
I want to do it for the good of the community.
No, you're not going to experiment on humans that way.
That's what came out of Nuremberg
after we saw
what the Nazis did, Mingala and others, and what the Japanese scientists did to American soldiers.
So even if somebody agrees to do it, if it's a serious disease, you can't do it. Well,
malaria is a serious disease. They're talking about how serious it is. So this is a violation
of that. And if COVID had been a serious disease, which
fortunately it wasn't, it was their treatments that were killing people. And the bioweapon
is their vaccine. Forget about Wuhan. It's their vaccine. So they didn't do the challenge test,
not because COVID was lethal. They didn't do the challenge test because they didn't do the challenge test, not because COVID was lethal.
They didn't do the challenge test because they didn't want people to see that all of their stuff about 90% of efficacy was nonsense.
Nonsense.
Even if they could find something to challenge them with.
I mean, that's the other part of it.
Did they really have a pathogen even?
A lot of people talked about how this is a very different flu strain, had different side effects. I've known people who had it,
who said that, and I trust them. I mean, I know that's true. And I've interviewed other people
who have gotten it and had severe effects, but nothing is as severe as their treatments. And
the treatments pale in comparison to the bioweapon, the Trump shots.
So they violate the Nuremberg Code to do this,
and they find that it's only 50% effective.
And then this person who participated said,
I cried when they told me that I had malaria.
Well, I would imagine so.
But why did she cry?
She said, because I developed such a close relationship with the nurses
and I wanted to continue through the trials.
Not because she got malaria.
Her infection made her ineligible.
And so she was given a drug to clear her case of malaria and sent home.
Well, if you've got a drug that works, then why do we have to vaccinate people?
Rhetorical question, right?
As for the volunteer, her experience was so positive, says NPR,
that she went on to participate in clinical trials for bird flu vaccine
and for the Moderna vaccine.
And she says that she will continue to enroll in vaccine clinical trials,
quote, for the rest of my life, actually, unquote,
which, by the way, might not be that long.
An attitude like that.
Yeah, here's a picture of it.
This article here, genetically engineered mosquitoes used to inject vaccines into humans on health impact news.
They show her arm.
It's absolutely amazing.
Look at that.
Look at that.
Just crazy that somebody would do that.
Bill Gates has spent billions of dollars, says Vaccine Impact,
on developing malaria vaccine over the past decade.
Last year, he funded a biotech firm that released genetically modified mosquitoes
into the Florida Keys.
And, of course, as I said, he's released them at talks that he did.
I think it was a TED Talk. But let's talk about the biosecurity state.
And we'll do that when we come back and take a quick break.
And we'll be right back to talk about the nexus nexus of a Fauci.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement,
the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day
of the festival
we're giving new members
money back
as a free sports bet
up to €10
if your horse loses
on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate
the biggest week
in racing.
Cheltenham
with LiveScore Bet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm
14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding
specials and place bets.
Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 18 plus gambling care.ie and cheney partners in crime
we'll be right back You're listening to The David Knight Show. The rise of Fauci and the U.S. biosecurity state.
Who was behind it?
This is an article by Mercola.
You'll also find it on childrenshealthdefense.com.
And as they point out, the subtitle,
Dick Cheney as Vice President was responsible
for putting all of the biodefense research
under the auspices of Dr. Anthony Fascist,
making Fascist the sole decision maker
on biodefense and scientific research.
Since 2003, the FAUCH has been responsible for civilian biodefense research
and early development of medical countermeasures against terrorist threats
from infectious diseases.
Now remember, it was the first thing that FAUci did when he got into his position there
at NIAID inside the NIH.
First thing he did was to, in 1986, he put through the act.
So he gets in in 1985 and takes him just a little bit of time, a few months,
and he gets this act put through to give legal immunity to the vaccine companies
for any damage they do to kids from the childhood vaccine program.
Hold them harmless.
And then in 2005, we had the PrEP Act that was put through by the Bush administration.
But you notice that Fauci gets in in 2003.
And the first thing he does is, well, let's give the manufacturers legal immunity for that.
He's got a history that keeps repeating, doesn't it?
Fauci was following in Cheney's footsteps,
using the same tactics to deceive the American public into war.
Cheney leaked false information to the press
and then used that press coverage to justify the invasion of Iraq, referencing his own leak.
You know, top administration official leaks this to the New York Times.
And then that very same day, Dick Cheney goes on and says, well, you know what the New York Times said?
Because I told him they said this, this and this.
And so, you know, we need to kick off the Iraq war.
Well, it's essentially the same thing that Fauci did.
You know, Fauci and collins released a study and um you know the study uh says this and that then he references his own study because he's also told you how he works
he creates disruption from the inside and he does it iteratively. Remember?
October 2019, the Milken Institute.
COVID-19, says Mercola, is a war against the public. Yes, I'm glad to see that so many people
are now saying that.
The purpose is to force us into a new world order, into a one world government
run by a globalist cabal,
where biosecurity is the justification for the removal of constitutional rights and freedom,
for removal of the rule of law.
Now, in Canada, removal of the Charter of Freedoms, you take the same approach in every country.
The CDC, he says, couldn't have botched its COVID-19 response anymore if it tried.
Well, it did try.
They tried.
They tried real hard.
And they knew exactly what was going on.
Look, common sense would tell somebody, certainly somebody who was at the epicenter of this.
And now we are going to find out if we ever get the documents.
I was telling people from the onset, just looking at what was happening.
We knew what was happening. We had seen the whole thing go before they knew there were no mistakes
that were made. And, uh, the reality is, is that we've got to have some serious reform of this
stuff. And unfortunately the Republicans are not even talking about any of the things that need to be done.
For the most part, they're focused on other issues.
They're focused on secondary, tertiary effects of this thing,
and they're not looking at the foundation of it.
On August the 17th, CDC Director Walensky even publicly admitted their failures,
and now she's trying to save face by reorganizing the agency.
But I like what he put here because it's some great quotes in this Mercola article from the Brownstone Institute's founder and president,
Jeffrey Tucker, who says,
the only way that you fix a captured bureaucracy is to get rid of it.
What do they mean by captured bureaucracy?
Well, it means you're the FDA and you're supposed to be monitoring these people. Instead, you are basically just doing press releases for them.
They're not monitoring Pfizer, Moderna. They're partnering with them. They're promoting their
stuff. They're not looking at it critically. They're not acting as a guardian for the public.
They have been captured.
And since a captured bureaucracy is, by definition, corruption,
it's not going to go away until you get rid of it.
And you can't get rid of that kind of corruption
unless you get rid of the bureaucracy.
And he's exactly right.
Jeffrey Tucker is exactly right.
You can't cut this cancer.
You can't cure this.
You've got to cut it out of society.
And it's metastasized everywhere in the bureaucracy.
He said, any serious effort to end the crisis has to deal with the problem of the administrative
state and of the bureaucratic power thereof.
Without that focus, no reform effort can get anywhere.
The reason is simple.
A free and functioning society cannot coexist with an undemocratic beast like this on the loose,
making its own laws and running roughshod over the rights and liberties
with zero oversight from elected leaders.
That's why I say we have rule by the bureaucracies with a Congress
abdicating their legislative powers.
Nancy Pelosi said we've got to pass it so we can find out what's in it.
How are they going to find out what's in it?
They're creating broad new programs and powers,
kicking it over to the three-letter agencies
who will then write in the details.
So that's when we're going to find out what's in it.
And then when they create these rules, they say, well, this is not a law.
These are rules.
If it were a law, we would have to give you due process, presumption of innocence, and
all the rest of the stuff.
And you would have protection against excessive punishments and fines.
But since this is just a rule, then you don't get a presumption of innocence.
You don't get due process.
And you don't get a presumption of innocence. You don't get due process and you don't get any protection against excessive fines.
And if we do anything to you,
like seizing your property first and calling it civil asset forfeiture,
because you know,
with no law,
it can't be criminal.
So this is a violation of rule.
So we'll call it civil asset forfeiture.
If you want to get your property back,
you got to sue us and you got to prove that you're innocent in the process.
They turned the entire process upside down, inside out with this.
So we have taxation without representation.
We have regulation without representation.
So they make their own laws.
They run roughshod over our rights and liberties with no oversight from our elected leaders.
Where is Rand Paul for years?
He knows what this issue is.
He's one of the only people who would talk about it.
For years, Rand Paul would put out what he called the REINS Act to rein in the bureaucracy.
I forget what the acronym actually was about, but he would have some co-sponsors put out a similar thing in the House, and they did it every year for several years.
And then all this stuff happens with COVID, and what's he doing?
He's just hiding out, and he's playing around the edges, and he's accusing Fauci of, well, we need to find out what you did about Wuhan, all the rest of the stuff.
He won't even attack the biosecurity state.
He won't even attack gain-of-function, and he won't attack the bureaucracy
and that political foundation that has been laid.
Jeffrey Tucker with Brownstone Institute goes on to say,
until the administrative state is defanged and disempowered,
there will be no representative government and no hope for change. It's obvious that the bureaucracies will not reform themselves. The reform will be only
cosmetic without any reality. And if you're going to just focus on show trials for Fauci,
that's going to get your face plastered all over the place. It's going to raise a lot of money for
you, but it's not going to change anything. That's just going to be a show trial.
There's not even going to be any reform.
They're not even going to pretend to reform anything.
It will not deal with the central problem as plainly stated by Harvey Risch, who says,
industry subservience and epidemiologic incompetence is how he characterized what happened.
Subservient to the industry
and incompetent from a scientific standpoint.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to 10 euro
if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. After Betsy DeVos, going on back to Jeffrey Tucker,
he said after Betsy DeVos left the Department of Education,
she said what needed to be said.
She said, we need to abolish it.
We need to shut it down.
We need to defund it completely.
We need to forget about it.
It does nothing useful.
Everything it does can be performed better at the state level
and by private entities.
She was there for four years.
And this is what they always do.
They always attack it when they're not in power.
When they're in power, they join it.
Betsy DeVos joined with the Department of Education.
She didn't fight it.
She didn't tell everybody.
She didn't expose it while she was there.
You know, all this stuff about President Trump saying,
well, you know,
so what if it's a classified document?
I can declassify it just by thinking about it.
Well, you know, he obviously never even thought about declassifying anything
that would expose the deep state, anything that would expose 9-11,
anything that would expose corruption or regulatory capture,
because he was part of that regulatory capture.
He was captured before he was even sworn in as president.
He invited RFK Jr. in, and then he used that to up his bidding price to the big
pharmaceutical companies.
They gave him a large cash donation, and he brought in the CEO of Eli Lilly to run
HHS.
That's how it works.
He just used RFK Jr.
So Jeffrey Tucker says,
what she says about the Department of Education
is equally true of another hundred plus agencies
in the administrative state.
People have been talking lately about abolishing the FBI.
Great, do it.
Same goes for the CDC.
It's time, right now.
Pull the plug on the whole
thing and sell the real estate. Truly, there is no other option except continuing to do what we
are doing now. But the status quo is intolerable. If a serious reform-minded Congress comes to power,
abolition, not reform, not cuts, needs to be the starting point of discussion.
Do you see that in the commitment to America?
No.
As I've said before, it's important for a candidate
to be able to correctly identify the problem.
And when somebody's a candidate,
they haven't been in office before, if they can correctly identify the problem, And when somebody's a candidate, they haven't been in office before,
if they can correctly identify the problem, it's worth a vote.
Trump correctly identified a lot of problems when he was running as candidate Trump,
which he then did nothing about.
And that's typically what happened.
That's typically the pattern.
And in an August 29th unheard article,
Ashley Rendsburg reviewed how Fauci rose to power
as the highest paid federal employee sitting at the very top of America's biodefense infrastructure
with near unlimited authority, at least as it pertains to science and what gets funded and
what doesn't. As I've said before, you're going to fight the deep state? There isn't anybody that's deeper than Fauci.
He is the epitome of the deep state.
He is involved with the military industrial complex and pharmaceutical companies.
He is at the juncture of those two things.
He's been in power.
He's paid more than anybody.
As a matter of fact, his salary violates the law.
He's not supposed to make any more.
None of these officials are supposed to make any more than the vice president.
And if you look at everybody else's salaries, they're capped.
They're below that $200,000 that the vice president gets.
And that includes people who are ahead of him, right?
He is at the NIAID, which is underneath the NIH.
The head of the NIH makes less than half of what Fauci does.
And the NIH itself is under HHS.
And the head of HHS right now is Javier Becerra, makes less than half of what Fauci does because
they have to make less than the vice president.
So how does he get around this?
Well, because he is the deep state.
The deep state.
The deep state that Trump's people begged him to fire,
but he would not fire the head of the deep state.
According to Rendsburg, the Bush administration came to power
with biological weapons and infectious disease very much at the top of mind.
Biodefense became even more prominent concern after 9-11 when you had the anthrax attacks.
Cheney served as the political engine behind a paradigm shift
that would soon take place in America's biodefense strategy.
Just six days before 9-11, Joe Biden, who was then chair of
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had led a hearing on the threat of bioterrorism
and the spread of infectious diseases. That's why I said, when he had these,
you know, he said dark winter last year. Oh, it's going to be a dark winter.
Things like that. So I don't know if that was really, you know, maybe that was kind of a, you know, going back to his deep involvement
in Operation Dark Winter in 2001. He was at the epicenter of all this six days before. And again,
remember they ran Operation Dark Winter two months before 9-11. Then a week later after 9-11,
they have their false flag anthrax attack.
Then two months later, they put out this Model State Health Emergency Powers Act legislation
based on that.
Well, six days before 9-11, Joe Biden is talking about bioterrorism and the spread of infectious
diseases.
Dick Cheney is setting up the infrastructure for all this stuff from the very beginning.
Both of them were heavily involved in Dark Winter.
Cheney's transformation of the American biodefense framework was part of a much larger repositioning of long-term geopolitical strategy,
an effort that was also led by Cheney.
Always the usual suspects.
Scooter Libby, remember that?
Cheney's chief of staff, guy involved in a lot of scandals,
broadened the concept of strategic depth to cover not only geographic reach,
but also the ability to wage war with weapons that could not only cripple
an enemy's military capabilities, but disrupt
its political, economic, and social stability.
Let's see, how did Fauci put it?
We do it with disruption.
We do it from the inside, and we do it iteratively.
Yeah, so Cheney and his chief of staff say, you know, if we're going to go to war with
somebody, we could use bioweapons to come after them and to completely destroy them politically,
economically, and their social stability.
What have we seen for the last couple of years?
They have come, they've gone to war with us.
Every one of these countries has gone to war with its own people.
Did it from the inside.
In 2003, the Bush administration increased the annual biodefense budget to $2 billion,
which was a staggering sum at the time.
Bush also earmarked about another $6 billion for the development and stockpiling of vaccines over the next decade.
But that was only part of it, the money.
To truly prepare for a bioweapon attack, research had to be conducted, coordinated, and to that end, Cheney brought all biodefense research programs
under the purview of a single entity,
the NIAID, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
led by Fauci.
With a stroke of Cheney's pen,
all United States biodefense efforts, classified
or unclassified, were placed under the aegis
of Anthony Fascist. In a nutshell,
this explains his power. And as I was reading this article, they don't
say, there is no explanation, there is no question as to why
he makes $417,000,
more than the president, more than anybody, more than any general, more than any bureaucrat.
Other than the president, their salaries, as I said, are supposed to be capped at that of the
vice president, which is less than half of what he's making. Perhaps he's double dipping.
Perhaps he's getting two salaries, you see. Perhaps he's got some kind of black budget.
I don't know.
I'm just guessing.
It's like nobody pays any attention.
He's so powerful as the leader of the deep state.
He's so powerful that nobody can even question his finances.
Although we do have some people who have pointed out what's going on here.
And we'll get into that next.
But, you know, he was able to continue to gain a function,
Francis Collins as well, back in 2014. They had a lot of accidents at biosafety level three and four
stations. I've talked about that. The leaks at the National Primate Center and Tulane University,
where they brought in this pathogenic bacteria, Herculderia pseudomallei, and it got out of the biosafety level three lab
and it was found at large and the population of primates who had not been in the lab and all the
rest of this stuff. And that was just the first kickoff. As they started looking at it, they
started finding all these different incidents where they had injected pinky in the brain with
some kind of a, you know, a pathogen and, and brain gets out and, uh, and they found
a faulty equipment.
They found people who had been infected.
And so they said, all right, stop it.
Stop this gain of function.
That was 2014.
And even though Congress is saying, stop it, Fauci and Collins continued it.
They continued it domestically at the university of North Carolina and other places.
They continued it in Wuhan and other places abroad.
How could he do this? Well, because his secret power is
he's part of the military industrial complex and he gets black budget and he gets all kinds of stuff.
And maybe that explains the sum of his compensation.
Maybe he's got another secret title that we're not
allowed to see. Maybe it's redacted somewhere under a black marker.
He can do whatever he wants.
He can defy Congress.
I mean, that is really the key.
It's just like in the Pike committee hearings.
At the same time, they're having the Senate committee,
the church committee hearings, and the Frank church.
They had the Pike committee hearings in the House,
and Pike called in the head of the NSA, and he said,
I'd like to see your charter.
He goes, I'm not showing that to you.
We're created by executive order by the president.
I'm not showing you anything.
That's Fauci.
That's Fauci.
He's like the NSA.
So for all these years, he's had carte blanche to approve
and to run whatever biodefense research he wanted without anybody telling
Him otherwise and if they told him otherwise
He would continue to do it anyway as we've already seen
It's been proven
So
That is the man in a nutshell
As reported by the US Right to Know
In the earliest days of the pandemic
Anthony Fascist and Francis
Collins emailed each other about
Coronavirus under study at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to see if they had any exposure to that legally.
Collins said in a February 1, 2020 email to Fauci, quote, no evidence this work was supported by NIH. About two hours after the email exchange, Collins and Fauci would join a secret teleconference with a group of virologists who were closely
examining the novel virus. The teleconference touched off
a high-profile push to discredit the lab leak hypothesis. So they
put it out there. And
it's very similar to what Cheney did, I mentioned
before.
September 8, 2002, the New York Times ran on its front page this story.
U.S. says Hussein intensifies the quest for A-bomb parts.
That same day, Vice President Dick Cheney appeared on Meet the Press,
hyping the New York Times story as evidence that Hussein was attempting to acquire the kind of tubes
that were necessary to build a centrifuge.
But what we now know is that the anonymous source
that was quoted by the New York Times was Cheney himself.
So Cheney leaks a false story to the New York Times, to the press,
the gold standard of the press, if you believe that
stuff. Then he used that news coverage to support his recommendations. Even mainstream Bob Simon of
CBS would remark to Bill Moyers years later, he said, so you leak a story, then you quote the
story. I mean, that's a remarkable thing to do, he said.
Remarkable is actually an understatement.
It's engaging in de facto conspiracy to deceive the U.S. public into war.
And Fauci used exactly the same kind of approach in his kind of disinformation campaigns that he was doing
because they're cut from the same cloth. Now, Fauci's net worth has soared from $7 million to almost $13 million during the pandemic.
This is research that was done by OpenTheBooks.com.
They said, in January 2022, Senator Roger Marshall forced open Fauci's unredacted 2019 and 2020 financial disclosures.
It followed a heated Senate exchange between Fauci and Marshall that concluded with Fauci
calling the senator a moron.
Remember that?
Well, it's been a dogfight to open the books on Fauci's finances.
For example, OpenTheBooks.com, their organization, has filed four federal
lawsuits against the NIH to get the information about Fauci. They found that his net worth went
up from $7 million to almost $13 million. He continues to be the most highly paid federal employee. And again, I wish that they would take a look at why he's able to get around the restrictions.
He out-earned the president, four-star generals, and 4.3 million other federal bureaucrats.
Fauci was also given big awards.
He augmented his gigantic government, illegal government
income with nearly a million dollars
in prizes.
It was a prize.
Nonprofit
organizations across the world, for example, I remember
reporting this, the Dan David Foundation
in Israel awarded him
$901,000, nearly
a million dollars, for what?
For, quote, speaking truth to power, unquote.
Where's my million dollars?
I've been speaking truth to power for years.
Fauci, what is he doing?
Talking to himself?
He is the guy who is in power.
How is he speaking truth to power?
He's power speaking lies is what he is.
And for defending science speaking truth the power and defending so now what he did was he redefined science science is what fauci says he said i am
science i am the law right uh speaking truth the power a break. Uh, but he got a million dollars from this Israeli organization for doing that.
Now let's take a look at Biogen.
Do you remember you're talking about, um, you know, $900,000, nearly a million dollars.
Well, Biogen, $900 million, nearly a billion dollars.
Remember beginning of this week, I talked about that.
I said, look, here's an example of some big pharmaceutical corruption,
just as we've seen with the opioid epidemic and Sackler and Purdue Pharmaceutical and stuff.
We saw how they were using all kinds of, not only is it unethical for them to offer prizes
and things like that, which are essentially bribes to doctors to prescribe their addictive opioids,
but they're also using hookers and other things like that. bribes to doctors to prescribe their addictive opioids.
But, you know, they're also using hookers and other things like that.
Okay.
So to say that it is a bribery is to put it mildly because there was a lot of illegal acts involved in the bribery itself.
Extenuating circumstances, I guess we could say.
So Biogen is accused of doing exactly the same
thing to push not an addictive opioid, but to push their multiple sclerosis drug.
They were accused of unethical behavior by a guy who was a regional sales rep, you know,
and he said there was a lot of people that were calling this stuff out. And so,
you know, he actually tried to do something about it.
When he did something about it, they fired him.
And so he pursued a whistleblower lawsuit with the government.
And so this week, the first part of the week, Biogen just says, all right, we'll settle with you.
Let's stop the lawsuit.
It was about to be heard by a jury.
It had gone for a long time.
And it was going to be heard by a jury. It had gone for a long time, and it was going to be heard by a jury, would have kicked off this week. Instead,
they gave them nearly a billion dollars and said, all right, we're done.
Within a day or two, they released information about a new Alzheimer's drug. So Biogen wants
this information, this corruption to get off the the scene because they know that they're about to release their study
about their new Alzheimer's drug.
And they did.
And the stock market pumped up their stock between 40% and 45%.
It went up as high as 45% and then ended down 40%.
40% increase.
So that billion dollars that they gave them, chump change.
They were just clearing the deck so they could make a killing.
Literally, I guess, on this stuff.
Last year, Biogen was also in the news.
They had another Alzheimer's drug.
Do you remember that?
Aduhelm.
Aduhelm was an Alzheimer's drug, and it created a big stir
because they were going to charge $56,000 per year, per patient.
$56,000 per year.
And this is something that these drugs are focused on,
the plaque that they associate with Alzheimer's, amyloid plaque.
And so it's going to target that specific plaque.
And so it was going to be something that was given to people as kind of a preventative,
or perhaps in the early stages of it, to slow down its progression.
It wasn't going to reverse it.
It was just going to slow down the progression of the disease.
But it was going to cost $56,000 per person per year.
And with an aging population of baby boomers, CMS, which runs Medicare and Medicaid, said
it's going to bankrupt the healthcare system.
It's going to bankrupt the healthcare system. It's going to bankrupt the country.
If we pay you for all the aging people,
we give you $56,000 a year for each and every one of them for this,
and we cover that with Medicare and Medicaid?
We can't do that.
And they even came out with a new rule to specifically say,
if you were going to come up with a drug that's going to focus on amyloid plaque,
unless you can prove that it actually does something, we're not going to pay for it.
So last year, they only made $100,000 off of this drug that they had planned to charge,
$56,000 a year per patient.
Did they only have two patients?
Well, with that, they would have had $112,000.
And when they were about to roll this thing out last year,
you had the industry representatives were saying,
well, this is what we think it's going to cost and so forth.
They thought that it was going to cost between $8,000 to $10,000 per patient,
and everybody was talking about how that was going to be a high cost.
But the unmitigated greed of big pharmaceutical companies,
as evidenced by Biogen, they took it up to $56,000 when even the insiders were saying $8,000 to $10,000.
So here we are a year later.
Now, that's put out almost exactly a year ago.
I think it was in June or July last year that that happened with the Adjuhelm.
And so now, this week, after they settled this lawsuit and push that off to the side,
uh,
about their crooked behavior with,
uh,
their other drugs,
they come out with this new drug.
Now this one is called,
uh,
Likanamab,
Likanamab,
I guess,
uh,
also to reduce the progression of Alzheimer's.
And so since they got blocked by a CMS on Adjahelm, for the last year, they've been
doing a study with this other one.
And they said, we've shown that it reduces the progress of the brain wasting disease
by 27%.
Does that sound familiar?
Does that sound like the study that Fauci did himself of remdesivir?
It was put up on Chinese.
It's a Chinese study that was put up on the World Health Organization
saying remdesivir doesn't do anything, but it can kill you,
can destroy your liver, things like that.
So it's a very dangerous drug because Fauci had tried to sell it for AIDS.
He tried to sell it for Ebola.
Everybody said it doesn't work.
It's dangerous too.
It kills people.
And so the Chinese did a study with this COVID.
It doesn't help anybody.
It kills them.
And so Fauci, they put that up,
and within a couple of hours,
it was down off of the World Health Organization's website.
Within a week, Fauci released his own unpeer-reviewed study.
It's just like Dick Cheney, right?
Fauci releases his study,
and I'm surprised that Mercola didn't reference that.
To me, that remdesivir thing is really a smoking gun.
That is even a closer parallel to
what Dick Cheney did with
his phony reports about
the Iranian nuclear
program. So he releases
his own report, references his
own report, and says, now
it's the standard of care.
He says, it doesn't cure anybody,
but they get better
faster. Well, this doesn't cure Alzheimer's, but it slows it down by 27%.
And so the stock market went wild.
It absolutely went crazy.
These are some of the boffo reviews coming from the boffins, I guess you could call it,
the technical people inside these Wall Street companies.
Here's BMO Capital Markets, and they say,
this data is as strong as can be, says their analyst.
They expect that it's going to this new drug,
licanumab, is going to win full FDA approval.
Then another one, Baird, upgrades Biogen to outperform from neutral.
Said the study data is a best case scenario.
Barclays says the lab results were clearly positive, exceeded expectations.
Raymond James said a clear win.
Best case scenario.
Are these people reading each other's reviews here and plagiarizing each other.
They said the top line data looks to be supportive of full FDA approval and most importantly, CMS coverage.
In other words, with this, they're going to get they're going to get Medicare, Medicaid to pay for it.
And on and on.
I could keep on.
I mean, and so it exploded.
I mean, their stock went vertical.
40 to 45% on that news.
And just the day before, they had removed all this other stuff,
paid a billion dollars to clear the way for their massive profit
selling this kind of fake news.
This is the way these people operate.
You know, Slowy, Monsef Slowy. selling this kind of fake news. This is the way these people operate.
Slowy,
Monsef Slowy,
who Fauci put in as head of Operation Warp Speed
with Trump sitting there
with a deer caught in the headlights.
Or maybe he just had his pockets
filled with his stuff.
Whatever they give him.
But Monsef Slowy and Fauci have put together stuff many times before.
They harmed a lot of people with the 2009 swine flu thing.
You have kids in Scandinavian countries that they documented came down with narcolepsy,
with catalepsy, where they just freeze and all this kind of stuff.
So anyway, they'd run this stuff before.
And Monsef Slaoui, if he gets put in as head of Operation Warp Speed,
lo and behold, the company that he was on the board of, Moderna,
is rumored to be the frontrunner in all this.
And, of course, that was the way they set up the press conference.
And Trump just followed the script, you know,
going progressively from one pharmaceutical company to the other.
And each one that he goes to, they're faster.
How did he know the order?
Well, because it was planned ahead of time.
It was a little dog and pony show.
He finally gets to Moderna.
We're ready to go.
We can start putting this stuff out tomorrow.
And so,
Moncef Slaoui,
who used to work for Moderna,
put in as chief of Operation Warp Speed,
and the stock jumps up,
and his like two or three million dollars
worth of stock
goes up to like 13 million,
and he sells it on the spike,
sells it on the news.
And,
um,
then,
uh,
people start complaining about that.
And he goes,
well,
I liquidated my position so that,
you wouldn't complain that I have a conflict of interest.
Yeah.
Right.
Like shooting somebody dead and saying,
you know,
uh, you got the smoking gun in your hand.
It's like, yeah, I just discharged the gun. So you couldn't accuse me of shooting anybody.
In the wake of negative Medicare coverage decision for Aduhelm, Biogen is sending the CEO to the
exit. So this is what was reported at the beginning of the week before they released this information.
They said, you know, because they came up with that drug
and they wanted to charge people $56,000 a year,
and Medicare said, no way we're going to do that.
And so they fired the CEO.
And then they said, without proper reimbursement,
Adjahelm posted only $100,000 in sales in the second quarter.
Well, that's just one quarter, So maybe they got about, uh, uh, eight patients.
Um, they said that this coming trial, however, is expected to report Alzheimer's outcome
data for, uh, lacanumab this fall.
So they were saying at the time, well, you know, it's going to be coming up in the fall.
Sometime it came up two days later.
And that was in a report where they were talking about shutting down that lawsuit by paying a billion dollars.
We have the first Gardasil wrongful death lawsuit.
This is reported by Children's Health Defense Fund.
And actually, it's Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and others who were involved as the legal counsel to bring this lawsuit.
A 13-year-old boy, and he was 11 at the time.
He struggled, and I'm not going to go into all the details of the things that happened to him,
but he immediately had a reaction to it.
And he struggled with it seriously for two years and finally succumbed to what it did to his brain.
He got a kind of encephalitis, and it was directly related to this,
and he died from it.
But when I looked at this story, it's just like the story about the volunteer
who volunteers to get bitten by these mosquitoes to test out a new novel vaccine,
and then the vaccine fails,
and she gets malaria anyway, and she wants to keep doing it.
Now, this young boy was not part of a test.
I don't know why he would have this.
There was no information in here as to why a boy,
because it's really, you know, the danger with HPV is for cervical cancer. So it's really
more of a risk for girls. But again, it is a sexually transmitted disease. A child at 11 years
old, why does he need that? And what are his parents doing? I just don't understand people giving their kids over to this. Not even looking at it
and saying, is this really anything that he's at risk for? I did it when he was 11 years old.
It's just so tragic to see this type of thing happening. 31 Gardasil vaccine injury lawsuits
were consolidated last month. So there's been quite a few of these and they've been all consolidated into a single big lawsuit. We'll see what happens
with it. Gardasil first came on my radar when you had Rick Perry as governor of Texas deciding,
and it was the first time anybody had done this. It was Rick Perry deciding that they were going
to make it a requirement for attending school. And it caused a great deal of pushback. And it turned out that one of his former staff
members had gone to work for the pharmaceutical company that was selling Gardasil.
You know, nothing to see there, right?
About half of recent online daters in the United States say that it is important to see COVID-19 vaccination status on profiles.
And, of course, it breaks down with political, you know,
Democrats want to see it, Republicans don't want to see it,
for the most part.
As a matter of fact, I think if I was on a dating website or something like that as a kid,
I would want to know that the person, before I would go on a date with them, I'd want to know,
first of all, that they're not an ignorant zombie believing everything the mainstream
media is telling them. And I would also want to know that they're not contaminated
with this stuff as well. So I can understand that.
And I'm surprised, actually, that it's only about 47%.
That means that 53% don't think it's important.
They don't think that it's important.
And that's how these people win.
We'll be right back.
Stay with us. Thank you. decoding the mainstream propaganda it's the david knight show
all right uh welcome back i want to thank uh faded reality before i continue on with the news
too i want to go through some uh uh, uh, correspondence that we've gotten.
It's been a while since I've done that.
I don't want to thank some of the people who have supported us this month.
We're very close to our goal.
Uh,
not there yet.
Uh,
also want to mention to people that,
um,
uh,
when it comes to,
uh,
uh,
Karen is right now delivering a bunch of stuff.
She packs it up and delivers it.
Uh,
she's taking care of all the merchandise things.
And so we're going to try to get it done this next week. We'll be here for about another
week and a half before I go back to Texas where Travis is getting married. They got married this
spring, but that was just immediate family that already started plans for a
wedding in the middle of October and had already made financial commitments down
payments and things like that on it but then decided that they wanted to come
with us for a while so they got married quickly there and at the house but they
still going through the bigger wedding for all their friends and extended family in the middle of October. So we're going there for that. And I'll be gone for
about a week. And, uh, Tony and guard will be covering the basis here and, and, uh, uh,
Billy Ray Valentine, I'm sure. And, and, uh, Don Jeffries will be a part of that.
And so, um, you're gonna, it's going to be a great week of shows for you. It'd be a change of that. And so, um, you're going to, it's going to be a great week of shows for you. It'd be
a change of pace and we'll be gone at that amount of time. But I, I say all that because, um, we're
not going to be able, at least that week, we're not going to be able to get any product out.
We won't be here. Uh, we'll be on the road and, um, and then actually things are going to get,
uh, difficult for us. We're going to try to get it out if we get any orders, but I can't promise that we're going to get anything out, uh,
after tomorrow, um, because that's when Karen is leaving.
So it's like, I'm doing, um, uh,
I'm doing like 18 hours a day on this stuff and, uh, six,
six days a week on, on the shows. And so, um, we'll,
we'll try to get this other stuff done, but I can't promise.
So it may be a bit of a delay. Um, she's gotten the stuff out pretty quickly within a, uh, 24 hours or so from what we've
received, uh, but it may slow down.
And, um, so if you go to the David night show.com, you'll see at the bottom of the new website,
you'll see places where you can find some of the things that you see on the table here,
the coffee cup that's there.
It's got a nice metallic, and a handle and the um this is a tumbler here for coffee stenciled with the david knight
show logo and it's by koozie and it's keep stuff hot for quite a long time we've also got pens of
various types we have the t-shirt karen said hold this up so people can see it so you just
put it up like it was a rag or something.
So let me hold this up. Nice. This is the back nice design.
And you can see that over there. It's always a kind of,
they stretched one out on a, um, on a, uh, box. Uh,
so that you can see it on the front, it's got a left chest logo.
So it's not overwhelming on the front, but the David Knight shows on the back.
And it is kind of a, um, charcoal gray. It looks darker on the website. The color is not accurate. And we mentioned that on the front, but the David Knight show is on the back. And it is kind of a charcoal gray.
It looks darker on the website.
The color is not accurate, and we mentioned that on the website.
The color is not accurate.
So that is some of the merchandise that we've got there.
Depending on how it goes, we will maybe get some additional things.
And so let me just thank some of the people who have contributed,
especially Tom and Nancy.
I appreciate them. They have been some of our longest contributors and big contributors to help us.
And he writes this, and I want to pass this along because we can pray for them, but I
would like for everybody to pray for them.
He said he's looking for alternatives to standard health care insurance.
He says also, please pray that we will have a good transition
to a good homeschooling state.
So they are looking to make a move. And so there's, you know, prayers involved
in terms of their financial situation and in terms of their homeschooling. So for Tom and Nancy and
their young children. And when it comes to health care insurance, alternatives to it,
as if you're a Christian, there's a couple of them out there. There's a Samaritan ministries and, um, uh, there is also, um, Christian care.
MediShare I think is, is the one.
And, uh, and basically what I like about those, um, is that, um, and we've been a member of
both of them at one time or the other. What I like about them is that you pay them a fee
of, you know, certain amounts like $100 or $150. I forget what it is. Karen writes the checks for
this thing on a regular basis. And that's done once a year. And that's where they make their
money off of that. And then what they do is they just share with you the needs of somebody. They
will operate as a clearinghouse. So if somebody has something they say is an issue, you call them
and you tell them what the situation is and they vet it to make sure that it's legitimate, that
it's something that would be covered. And then what they do is they pass your name on to other people,
and those other people, you write a check directly to the people who have an issue.
So they tell you what the issue is, you know,
like when I had my heart attack or something.
They tell you what the issue is,
and then all these people will write checks for whatever their monthly amount is.
And the monthly amount depends on if you have a family or, you know, if you're an individual, how old you are, that different factors like that will change it.
But it's significantly cheaper than medical insurance.
Sorry, I don't know why I'm having cough issues here,
but it's significantly cheaper than it is to get health insurance,
especially with Obamacare.
And we have found it to be quite a bit cheaper
because if you come in and say, well, I'm a self-pay,
which you really are.
I mean, they hold you.
You have to pay for this.
There's no guarantee. It's not insurance. There is, they hold you. You have to pay for this. There's no guarantee.
It's not insurance.
There is, if you have something that's catastrophic, like cancer or something like that,
there is a catastrophic insurance that's there.
But for other things, it's just handled by sending your name out to people each month.
We get the name and address of somebody and what has happened to them,
and you send them a card and a check, and you can pray for them.
And so it's a Christian ministry.
Both of those are.
If you're not a Christian, there's another one that is Liberty something.
I forget what that was, but it's also a sharing thing.
And those were given exemptions from Obamacare.
And what we have found, and this was
true even before Obamacare, we found that it's actually the LA Times years ago did an article.
And they said, look at how messed up this insurance and hospital thing is. You know,
we took somebody who is a cash patient and went in. and I said, well, we know since you're a cash patient, we can't do this and that.
And we'll give you a discount if you pay cash because they don't like the hospitals don't like to deal with the insurance companies either.
So they said they looked at what a cash patient paid. And then they looked at what somebody who had a real Cadillac health insurance
policy paid with all the other things that they tacked onto it and the higher
prices that they tacked onto it.
Even though the insurance company paid 80%,
that 20% that the customer was responsible for was quite a bit higher than what
the cash patient paid for.
And we know that's true.
In the past, I would go in when I had these and I would say, oh, yeah, I'm a cash patient.
They said, oh, well, normally we do this test and this test and this test.
But since you're a cash patient, we don't really need to do that.
We just run up the bill.
So we won't do that.
It's like, good, because I don't want to have a bunch of unnecessary procedures done to me.
And to be charged more because I have a health insurance.
Let me just add insult to injury. The health insurance is more. And then when you have a claim,
you wind up paying more even with your deductible that's there. Uh, thank you for the tips. Uh,
Alan Terry, thank you very much. Um, so as the parents and the manufacturers should be hung,
I think he's responding to, uh, the, the kid who died from Gardasil.
I don't know what the parents were thinking.
It could have been a situation where maybe they were pressured into doing that.
But again, it's ignorance.
They play on people's ignorance, and that's really the crime so many times.
Angry Tiger, thank you as well for the tip.
He says, although it is true that we're in the hands of monsters in the physical sense we should never fear we should persevere or in the spiritual sense we
are in the hands of the lord and we have the long game covered god bless everyone have a good weekend
you're absolutely right absolutely right we have it covered um let me uh cover some of these other
ones here um this is a long letter from um well, I'm going to get to this later because
I'm trying to find the name here. There's so much that's in here. I can't read the entire thing to
you. So I don't want to just start reading somebody's information. There might be something
that's personal. What to do as newbies prior to the midterms. This is a question from a listener, Jackie.
He said, I've been a listener for many years.
Somehow we both ended up in East Tennessee at the same time.
Here's my question.
What can we do as new arrivals prior to the midterms?
I agree with you that all politics are local prior to fleeing New Jersey.
I'm glad you're out of New Jersey.
Wow.
As I said, from darkness to light. How about that? Post-Tenebrous Lux. My spouse ran for
a position in our town, but lost due to an overwhelming population density in the welfare
district. No one can say we didn't try. That's right. Spent a lot of time and money to no avail.
I'm sure you can identify with that experience. We know, we are still trying to get our ID stuff
together. So our plan today is to go in, all of us, to get our driver's licenses and register to
vote and that type of thing. But I noticed that in Tennessee, they have four constitutional amendments
on the ballot. And, you know, one of them is inconsequential. It's like,
you know, what happens if the governor is incapacitated? You know, can these,
the guy who's head of the Senate, can he step in? Can he hold two offices at a time? Things like
that. I mean, we do have a lieutenant governor here, so I don't really understand that aspect of it. Um, there's one on there that, uh, gets
rid of a law that was, um, prohibiting, um, anybody who was a, had a religious office,
like a pastor or priest or rabbi prohibiting them from holding office. So, uh, there's one
there to get rid of that prohibition, which I don't understand why they would put that on there
anyway. But, um, and then there's one about involuntary servitude and slavery.
So that's the one everybody's talking about.
And that's in the context of, you know, it says there will be no involuntary servitude or slavery unless you're in prison.
So they wouldn't get that taken out.
I don't know what is about that.
But it is difficult.
It is difficult to find out what is going on at the local level.
She said, what do we do? Do we put up tables at local festivals? Do we hand out flyers?
I think probably the best thing to do
is, and we have not done this,
but I would say that
I've talked many times to sheriffs.
I think they really are key.
It's the most important local office there.
And so I would say that it's kind of important to find out where the sheriff is coming from.
Find out if he's on your side.
And one of the best ways to do that is to start, if you're going to try to get people together,
try to organize around that so that you've got an organization where you can go in and talk to them.
So it's not just a, you know, hi, this is John Doe coming in to talk to the sheriff.
Does he really have time to talk to you?
But if you're coming in there as part of a community organization, he may have time or take the time to talk to you. You may take the time to fill out a questionnaire and, um,
and then that would be the point at which you can either support or oppose this
guy. Uh, so, uh,
I think that's probably a good starting point moving into a new area like that,
but, you know, getting to know, uh, people in your area, uh,
in areas other than just politics, Because when you look at what is necessary for prepping, nobody can do everything themselves.
And so there are going to be things that you can do, and there's going to be things that
you're not going to be able to do or not going to be able to do well.
And you need to get involved with some other people on that. This is a question from an individual who asked, he said, I was emailing you to ask
if you had a reference for the article about the Department of Energy's bogus, corrupt
study of diesel fuel and how they hooked up people to diesel that could be potentially
lethal, expose them to many times as safe levels.
Well, it wasn't the Department of Energy.
It was the EPA.
It was in Research Triangle Park in North Carolina.
And I covered that.
It was about, it was 10 years ago that I covered that.
In terms of, I've got a lot of, I was looking to see if I could find the report anywhere.
I haven't been able to find the report because the reports got purged.
And I understand even though I'm not listed on band.video anymore,
they still have my stuff there.
But it's hard to find.
It really is.
I haven't been able to find my reports on it.
It was done by Steve Malloy.
He was the one who discovered it 10 years ago.
But he might have some stuff in his archives on junkscience.com.
But he was the one who noticed that people were being taken to the emergency room. He started
digging into the study, and as he got into the study, he noticed that they were looking for
people who already had respiratory and heart issues because they were trying to ramp
up the prohibitions on diesel. But then they exposed people to, I think the number was 72
times what they said was the maximum amount. And at the same time, you had the EPA director
going before Congress and saying, we're not talking about people getting sick. We're talking
about people dying. And there's more people dying from fine particulate matter than are dying from
cancer.
All of it was nonsense,
but you know,
we've heard all this before again,
subsequently,
right?
More people dying of COVID than dying of cancer.
It was,
uh,
Mike Adams who was pushing out that lie from the CDC,
uh,
at Infowars.
He's putting up their charts and saying,
see,
the CDC said it.
So therefore, it's as ridiculous as this Pentagon shill
that I was talking about earlier, Jennifer Griffin.
Well, this is what the Pentagon says, so that's the case.
I mean, for Mike Adams to be pushing that out about the CDC
as if it was gospel truth,
they wouldn't know the truth if they saw it.
So this is from Patricia.
This is in response to a story I had where we were talking about the immigrants who had
been transported by DeSantis and by Abbott as well, and they were filing the lawsuit.
Patricia says, how do they have any constitutional rights?
They're not citizens of this country.
Well, you know, they're not subject to the jurisdiction of this country, but I guess
if they are in this country, you want to give them the same protection of law that is there.
The question is, is though there are certain
things that they do not get because they're not citizens of this country but uh as human beings
we all have natural rights and so we want to make sure for reasons that um what i would say is that
we want to make sure that everybody gets due process i don't think they ought to be able to
sue i don't think they have standing as non-citizens to sue.
So let's put that aside.
I think the lawsuit, to come into a country illegally,
and then to say to the governor,
you illegally flew me to a luxury resort,
and I'm going to sue you for that.
I mean, that is so ludicrous on the face of it.
But no, they don't have legal standing because they're not citizens.
And they violated the law to get in. So they don't have legal standing because they're not citizens. And, you know, they violated the law to get in.
So they don't have legal standing about that.
But I'll just say in terms of, you know, if they commit a crime or something,
you want to give them the same types of protections that you would give anybody else, I think,
because it's a very dangerous thing to turn the government into a monster that doesn't have to obey the law.
A government that is criminal, a government that terrorizes people,
is the most dangerous criminal, is the most dangerous terrorist.
And that's why we say that we want to always have due process.
Even when we know the person is dead guilty, everybody knows this person is guilty,
you still give them due process because the law has to be of help.
The law is the thing that keeps the government in check.
And that's the Leviathan that you want to make sure doesn't get loose.
So, yeah, we want to give them, if it's some kind of a trial,
but if it's a civil lawsuit that came in and violated the law,
that's absolutely insane.
This is from Dr. Bennett Cecil, who I've interviewed here on the show.
He says, we got another lymphoma case that has now blossomed by the mRNA jab.
Remember, I was talking about how some of the doctors are calling it turbo cancer,
how it accelerates. First of all, it destroys your immune system, the killer T cells that
are your body's primary defense against cancer, because we all have it to some degree or the
others. I mentioned the PCR tests, and Kerry Mullis said,
we've all got all these different pathogens in our body.
If you magnify it enough, you can find anything.
And so if your body's immune system is not working properly,
you are very subject to cancer.
And that's why Dr. Ryan Cole, the pathologist,
when he looked at what was happening with people
who were having adverse effects on the vaccines,
he said that their killer T-cell count is way down.
He said, you're going to see an explosion in cancers,
and we've now seen that.
So Dr. Cecil says,
Dr. Stephanie Seneff is a brilliant scientist who has the best single article of how the mRNA injections cause cancer and damage the immune system.
We have a very intricate immune system that keeps us alive.
She has two PhDs from MIT in electrical engineering and in computer science.
Her book on glyphosate is a page turner.
And she recounts another lymphoma case that blossomed after the mRNA jabs.
And he quotes from the article,
analysis detailed in a recent case study on a patient diagnosed with a rare form of lymphoma
called angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma,
provided strong evidence for unexpected rapid progression of lymphomatous legions
after administration of the mRNA booster. Comparisons of detailed metrics for hypermetabolic
lesions conducted immediately before and 21 days after the vaccine booster revealed a five-fold
increase after the vaccine, and with a post- post booster test revealing a twofold higher activity
level in the right armpit compared to the left one. Well, there you go. That's another one of
these, um, incidents. Um, the vaccine had been injected on the right side. So, um, this is, um,
uh, the case I think that I was talking about the other day. I think I did cover
this from a different article perspective. And that was a doctor who's still trying to say,
well, you know, I know I pushed this thing and my brother and I believe that this is what happened.
You know, he's given two shots in one arm and they saw a bright cluster with the imaging of this lymphoma on that side.
And they thought, well, they were suspicious that might have happened.
And then he got a booster, and he got a booster on the other arm.
And they thought it was odd because the asymmetry of where the cancer was located, you know, in the boosters, all of it on the side where he'd gotten the two shots. Then when he got the booster, uh, with the one additional shot of the booster,
he got a bigger asymmetry than he did with the two shots in the other arm.
He says, you know, I think maybe that can't fool anybody. You know, it's a can't fool everybody
for all the time. And that's what I think is the issue. I think people are starting to wake up to this.
Pediatrician drops care.
This is sent by listener Jeff.
He says, I have a nine-year-old daughter, a five-year-old son.
Two weeks ago, they had their annual wellness visit, and of course, the vaccines came up.
They weren't pushing COVID, just the other routine shots,
and I've been refusing them for the past few years.
This year I told the nurse to just put down that we're rejecting vaccines
based on religious beliefs.
My stance is that I'm putting my trust in God and not man for the health of my children.
The next day I get a letter from them stating that they are dropping care for my kids.
I tried calling them to discuss the ethics of this decision, but the standard fallback
was, that's our policy.
Good riddance, but still curious if this is going to be a more common practice across
other providers.
And that reminds me, in addition to Samaritan Ministries and care, MediShare. Uh, there are, I did the interview, um, a few
months ago with a guy who had been doing telehealth. Uh, he had set up his company before the lockdowns
to be working for the military. But, um, now after the lockdown and because people have,
um, you know, seen that they're, they're not, they're going to
be dropped if, um, you know, they don't get vaccines and other things like that. And because
people could not get ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or get somebody to prescribe that for
him. Uh, his service has now, uh, really escalated. Uh, I talked to, uh, someone else when I was,
before we moved here to Tennessee and I've set up an
interview to have her back on again and she's looking to do something similar with it so
that's another thing in terms of your medical care they have different fee structures he was
setting it up as like a you know monthly thing that you would pay for,
which for medical costs was not really that expensive, but you would wind up having a general practitioner
who is actually going to be practicing wellness stuff
as well as doing referrals to you if you need to see a specialist.
That's very important to have,
and that would take the place of somebody like this
for your family. And I would just say you trust God and you should trust God.
And I think a lot of this stuff that is happening, we're going to look back on it. It's going to be
a real blessing. God has revealed who the people are who are in it for the money. The people who
are not doctors, they just prescribe whatever the pharmaceutical companies tell them to do
at any given moment.
They're not practicing health.
They're not practicing doctors.
They don't think.
They don't question anything.
And so these people are like this,
the people you just talked about,
are being exposed,
just as we had the Zoom classes exposed to a lot of parents
what they didn't know was happening in the schools all the stuff is coming to light and so now the
ball is in our court uh to see what we're going to do with this and so i would just count that as a
blessing that that's now been exposed as to where these people are coming from and if you want to
find somebody that's going to help i I would suggest you take a look at
some of these other services.
We're going to take a quick break.
And when we come back, we're going to take a look at New World Order and get into some
headline news.
We have some interesting stories and headline news.
We'll be right back.
Stay with us decoding the mainstream propaganda it's the david knight show David Knight Show. Welcome back. We have, as we're talking about the technocracy
and all these other issues that surfaced,
that there is a fight going on at the University of California.
California University.
I think it's University of California.
It's in the story here.
Elon Musk was using the university
to do some of his Neuralink experiments.
And you've seen the pictures of the monkeys.
They have their heads shaved.
They've removed part of the skull to get access to their brains.
And the animal rights people are furious at the way that they're being treated.
They aren't focused really on what the purpose of this is.
The purpose is ultimately to do this to people.
They're doing this to animals right now.
And as bad as that is, you know,
people got really upset with Fauci over the puppies.
And rightfully so.
But they're paying attention to the fact that Fauci and the NIH
and these other government agencies had contracts out on babies in California.
That's what the Center for Medical Progress's whistleblowing stuff showed, that they had
contracts out, kill the babies and send us the organs. And we know that they're going to kill
the babies as they schedule it in a certain way. We know that they're born alive. We know that
they're live vivisection in order to get those organs in good shape. People just don't care about what is done to their fellow man,
but they really get upset about the animal.
And I understand.
I mean, there's absolutely no reason to do any of this either.
But this is Elon Musk.
He is a guy who is a transhumanist.
He is a guy who comes as family as part of the elitist technocracy.
His grandfather tried to overthrow the Canadian government and instill a technocracy.
And he's the king of crony capitalism, all the rest of this stuff.
But he is now considered by many conservatives to be their savior.
We just need to have a billionaire who's going to ride in on a white horse like Donald Trump or Elon Musk and they're going to fix everything.
Or Peter Thiel, right?
And these guys are, you know, Peter Thiel and Elon Musk.
They're transhumanists.
They're technocrats.
They're global elitist.
They're selling surveillance.
They're selling the climate change.
That's where climate change and that stuff is where Elon Musk made all his money. He's putting up satellites to spy on
people. I understand Alex
cheering him on. Everything that he did, Alex was just enamored with and cheered it.
It was kind of funny when he shot the rocket up with the
old Tesla Roadster, which was not worth much anyway.
They were nice looking, but it
didn't work all that well. And, um, so when he, he shot that off on a rocket
and, um, I was kind of laughing about it saying, well, it kind of looks staged. I don't know.
Then I went off on Elon Musk and then Alex's program started right after mine.
And he was just worshiping him. Oh, he's's gonna take us to the stars and all this other kind of stuff and it's like yeah we need somebody like he wants his money
you know he's looking at a donor who's going to give him millions of dollars in bitcoin or something
uh so neural link i mean do we really want elon musk or anybody else for that matter hacking into
our brains uh california university is refusing to release a cache of grisly photos of monkeys reportedly
injured during experiments testing Musk's Neuralink brain implant technology.
In spite of a lawsuit, 371 photos evidently exist of the experimented-upon monkeys subjected
to the Neuralink test, which took place in the school's veterinary lab facilities.
Earlier this year, Neuralink admitted that a fifth of the 23 rhesus monkeys that it used to
test its brain hacking implants had been euthanized after developing infections and malfunctions.
Malfunctions, that's an interesting way to describe a living organism. Malfunctioned.
This is just from their perspective as well.
It's clear the university is simply trying to hide from taxpayers the fact that it partnered with Elon Musk to conduct experiments in which animals suffered and died.
But, you know, do we care about the humans?
Do we care about the babies?
Do we care?
No, no, just don't care about that.
Neuralink paid UC Davis, that's it, University of California, Davis, paid them $1.4 million
to use their facilities between 2017 and 20. Today, Tesla is going to have their AI day,
artificial intelligence. And he's going to talk more about uh presumably about his robots remember
last year what a joke it was when they did the presentation and he had the guy uh you know in
the spandex suit come out with a helmet and dance around like he was a robot yeah he prefaced it by
saying we have more robots than anybody else because our cars are actually robots when they're in self-driving mode, the autopilot system.
And so we're going to leverage that superior technology that we have.
We're going to leverage that into our biped robots or something like that.
And he's talking about how he's going to use them in his factories.
Well, the problem is he might want to get the other ones working first in the cars.
The showstopper of last year was a humanoid that was actually entirely human.
Person dressed in a skin-tight white suit as he's making the announcement that that was
on par with the cyber truck where he says watch this special glass and he throws the metal ball
at it and breaks the window then they do it again and and so that just uh i must have thrown it too
hard so they throw it a little bit softer it still breaks the window. He said, our cars are basically semi-sentient robots on wheels, and yet those robots
on wheels are not looking too good. Earlier this month, a
California man filed a proposed class action suit in San Francisco
Federal Court, claiming that the car maker has deceptively
and misleadingly, that's his phrase, marketed
in driver assistance systems and strung consumers
along by suggesting for years that it's on the cusp of mastering the technology.
Musk has nevertheless extended access to full self-driving to about 160,000 owners in the
U.S. and Canada.
When one of those owners posted videos last month showing the latest beta version struggling with right turns,
the CEO told the customer not to complain.
So anybody who is very susceptible to the criticism.
And, you know, here's the thing that I have a problem with this.
It's a beta test.
And they've enrolled 160,000 people in beta tests.
Now, if somebody wants to get enrolled in a beta test, that's their business.
But if they're out on the road, I'm involved in their beta test as well.
That's the thing I have a problem with.
And as I pointed out years ago, Steve Wozniak,
one of the co-founders of Apple Computer with Steve Jobs, he had one.
He said, I love my Tesla, but he said, don't put it in autopilot.
That thing will try to kill you.
And I think that's the way to understand it.
I have a friend who's got a Tesla and he let me drive it when he came out here.
It's a great car to drive, it really is.
But I would not want to put it on autopilot because of what I know about that.
And I say it's a great car, it's very different.
You know, it's a very different feel.
Because when you ease up on the accelerator, when you push the accelerator down,
I mean, the electric cars,
they just have instant torque and you're gone.
And then when you ease up on it,
it's almost like you're immediately
putting on heavy braking
because it has regenerative braking.
So the feel that you get with a throttle
is that you push it down.
It's almost like you're on a,
I kept thinking of the slot cars
that I used to do when I was a kid,
electric slot cars. And you would, you know, make it go faster. So as soon as you turn that thing
down, it would immediately slow down. And that's the way it is with, that's very, it's a nice
driving car. It's a nice feel, but you know, don't put it in autopilot. An attempt to extensively
automate the facility where the Model 3 first went into
production ended in disaster. Musk took ownership of the calamity back in 2018, saying it was his
mistake. And when he talked about it, he said, humans are underrated. Humans are underrated.
I would say so. And I would say our brains are underrated. I would say the sanctity of our bodies is underrated in many different respects.
U.S. home heating costs are set to surge 17% in the U.S.
It's going to be much higher in Europe.
But even here, the average household heating bill is expected to go up by 17%.
And that's over, compared to last year, we already had a lot of inflation. And
of course, it's going to be a big issue for lower income families. But here's how this breaks down,
which I thought was pretty interesting. Natural gas costs, they say, are expected to go up by 24%.
Heating oil costs will go up by 54%. Propane bills will go up by 15%.
And they said winter heating costs for households that are using electricity are going to be
looking at about a 7% jump. Now, of course, they're looking at just the expected increase
because of the cost of the fuel or the energy or whatever that you got there.
And that's going to vary based on whether the winter in your area is intensive or not.
So that's independent of the severity of the weather.
That's just looking at the cost.
So 24% for natural gas, 54% for heating oil, 15% for propane, 7% for electricity.
However, however, in Dallas and Houston, again,
when you look at the severity of the weather,
in the summer they had bills that were 23% higher
from the same period of time last year.
So you combine the higher costs of generation and fuel
with the worse weather, and you get a 23% increase.
If you look at it from a regional standpoint, though, this is the key thing. In New York City,
the average monthly natural gas bill is going to go up by 32%. Electricity costs will jump not 7%, but 22% to 27% in New York City.
And if you look at Massachusetts, the National Grid of Massachusetts,
that's the name of the, I guess, power company, or it's, I don't know.
But anyway, people are providing the power to the grid.
Announced last week that it was going to increase electricity rates by 64%
from November through May. So coming up in November, 64% increase in Massachusetts.
But of course, they want to put everybody on the grid. They don't want anybody having any other
alternative. We're going to put all of our eggs in one basket while they are crushing the eggs in the basket.
That's really what they're doing.
A headlong rush to net zero.
This is coming from the Daily Skeptic.
When we look at that, Daily Skeptic says it makes the great depression a certainty because that's what this
is about. As I said before, the, uh, the wars are a certainty because they all want it. Just like
they began with the sanctions against us. And the depression is a certainty because they all want it.
They want it to bring in their, uh, their great reset. They want it to bring in central bank
digital currencies and all the rest
of this stuff. 20 years of vandalism of the energy system. That's a great way to describe it.
They're vandalizing the energy system. It was the only way it was ever going to have only one
result, and that was one that was not going to be fixed in a hurry. First of all, the man in the street has been led to believe that global warming is a crisis.
Make no mistake about it.
This is a lie.
And that's why I say, you know, when you look at even conservative media like Breitbart
and Tucker Carlson, oops, that's the wrong one.
I want to show this.
When you look at them, you know, highlighting the fact, oh, look, it's methane.
It's an environmental disaster.
It's not an environmental disaster.
Methane is not an environmental disaster.
CO2 is not a pollutant.
It's necessary.
And so we have to tackle that lie.
Because if we live by that lie,
then the totalitarians, the communists, win.
It says, understand that even if you go with their explanation of this,
the worst that climate change might throw at us is that it will only cause a small loss of wealth.
That's what they're saying.
They're saying, you know, if we have a 3.6 degree centigrade of warming, the result in
the loss of just 2.6% of gross domestic product, that's what it's going to cost?
When you look at that, their own models, if they're true, you know, if it's going to cause
global warming, if it's going to cause the seas to rise and all that sort of thing, it's going to cost us some gross domestic product.
If all of that were true, 2.6% of gross domestic product, what they're doing now is far, far more damaging.
Their rush into these new technologies that are going to make the billionaires into trillionaires, uh,
that is going to be a much,
much higher cost to us.
These things are not going to work.
These things are going to cost a fortune.
What they're doing,
their solution is far worse.
Just as we see with their sanctions against Russia,
far worse for us than anything.
Uh,
so by far the biggest impacts of climate change,
sea level rise, and flooding
could be addressed through simple, relatively cheap adaptation measures.
Nevertheless, the relentless scaremongering by green activists,
hate campaigns launched against anybody that is a naysayer, have done the trick.
To the extent that the idea of a climate emergency
is now the received opinion, despite the lack of evidence to support it, to support this
MacGuffin.
And we saw the same thing with a novel flu virus.
Oh, you can't push back against that.
And so that now is the official position.
And we're going to do whatever is necessary.
Can't wait.
The second trick, he said, that's been played on the public
by the renewables industry and the green activists,
which together have persuaded most people
that an energy transition is possible.
To do this, they've engaged in a 20-year campaign
of disinformation about what it costs
to go to wind and solar for the grid and about the availability of storage technologies for when
the wind stops blowing and the sun isn't shining. And there are no reasonable alternatives for those
things for the grid. And we all know that even if you do that for your home, the storage issue in terms of getting batteries, that is the key issue.
But there aren't any industry-wide batteries that are really in place.
So that remains to be.
So they've lied to people about whether or not this transition is even possible.
They know that it is not possible.
And they are using that to push you into this preplanned austerity.
Accounts show that even from their audited accounts, they show that they're refusing to take up their contracts at the agreed price, these people who are putting the stuff on the grid, and that the whole exercise is in essence a scam to fool the politicians
into keeping the renewables boondoggle going.
Even if the politicians wanted to do something, they are cornered.
They can't address the energy crisis without being accused of endangering the planet,
ignoring cheap renewables,
and so the lie has done its work.
So yes, says the Daily Skeptic,
the Great Depression appears to be a racing certainty.
It's coming quickly.
Even the Washington Post is now talking about
why electric vehicle batteries are so dangerous.
They said, you know, we have these big batteries.
They're made up of a lot of smaller batteries.
They're kept in close proximity to each other.
They're not compartmentalized.
So if something happens to one of them, it turns into a runaway fire.
And we've talked about that for the longest time.
You know, once something happens with electric vehicles,
it's very, very difficult to get the fire put out.
And so now even the Washington Post is talking about it.
They said, and the title of the article was,
Tesla's big batteries aren't the fire problem, lithium is.
They said Americans should be questioning whether or not lithium ion power packs
should be used for applications such as electric vehicles.
The piece argues that the science of lithium-ion batteries
makes them inherently dangerous.
But, you know, if you're somebody like Toyota
and you want to come up with,
hey, we got an electric vehicle approach here,
you know, we could try to use hydrogen or something like that.
Oh, no, not going to be able to do that.
We're going to have this solution,
and that's the only one that's going to be allowed. Why? Because it's all political.
And I think that it has both a crony capitalism aspect to it, you know, Elon Musk. And I think
it is also, they want to push this because it gives them greater centralized control than it
would if you were able to just, you know, put hydrogen or something else in there and run a fuel cell. They don't want that
technology. And so Toyota has fought that, but they have been ostracized and they've been given
the coal shoulder in terms of any support for that infrastructure. So there's no places to get any
hydrogen. And so they're going to be forced by central planning of the government
to use this one particular type of technology.
So they said big batteries made up of several cells packed together.
Current is constantly flowing inside, which generates heat.
If there's no barriers between the components,
a failure in one part quickly cascades through the rest.
Elaborate critical equipment for cooling the system is put in place,
and that also draws energy from the actual power pack, reduces its output,
and in addition, when charged, a couple of lithium metal, a coat, rather, of lithium metal can form on the surface and then dendrites or little needle-like structures
can grow and lead to short circuits.
But there's other issues as well.
For instance, in its review of battery failures in 2019 and 12,
the Arizona State Commission pointed to reports of fires
with 10 to 15 feet flame lengths
that grew into 50 feet to 75 foot lengths,
appearing to be fed by flammable liquids
coming from the cabinets.
At one incident, it took nearly three months
to discharge the stranded energy.
And so it's been very difficult for them to handle a car fire.
It keeps, like I've said many times,
it's like one of these trick birthday candles.
You blow it out and it sparks back up and does it again.
They wind up towing them away,
and they get it put out temporarily, tow it away,
and then it catches fire again at the junkyard or whatever.
They have to put it, submerge it into water or other things like that.
But where it really gets bad is when you use it with the buses.
Remember, we've had several of these situations.
It happened in France.
It happened in Spain.
It happened in Germany.
In Germany, you had an electric bus that caught fire,
burned down an entire bus station.
All the buses there.
And, of course, they put out some toxic gases when
they're doing that. But when you look at it for the big vehicles, it really does magnify the
problem, whether it's a bus or whether it is the semi semi trucks. And so, uh, this is going to be
something to, um, to keep an eye on. Uh, we're currently seeing the consequences of the gas shortage in Germany and
Europe, says one person, because we didn't have any alternatives.
They put all their eggs in one basket.
That particular basket was, we're going to get gas from Russia.
All right, cool.
They can give it to us for cheap.
We'll just do everything that way.
And that is what's happening with the,
that is what is happening with globalism in general.
We, you know, that is the way they operate.
As I've mentioned before, you had the massive floods in Thailand,
and it was somewhere between 2009 and 2012 that happened.
I don't remember the exact date.
But all of a sudden, I was trying to get some disk drives.
I couldn't find any.
They were unbelievably expensive.
So I was like, what is going on?
Why did these, because this is an old technology.
Why is it all of a sudden so expensive from when I last bought one?
And they'd had floods, which is not an unusual thing.
I mean, they get floods all the time in that area of the world, in Thailand and Vietnam,
just like Florida gets hurricanes.
But they had put almost all of the Winchester Drive manufacturing in that one area.
And so it took it out for everybody.
And that's what they typically do.
They put all their eggs in one basket.
They invest in the Russian pipeline into Germany. And so this
person said, as we see this happening, what is happening with this energy catastrophe that we're
facing for this winter is because we didn't have any alternatives. So he goes, so we need to think
about that with the automotive industry. We shouldn't put everything into battery operated
electric vehicles. We should have some alternatives, except we're being rushed,
right? It's an emergency. So you got to do it now and don't question what they're going to do.
And as they're shutting down the grid at the same time. All right, we're going to take a
quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about some headline news.
We have some interesting, thought-provoking things that have been brought up. And we're going to talk about that when we come back.
Stay with us.
Using free speech to free minds.
It's the David Knight Show.
Well, before we get into the thought-provoking stuff,
let's get into the mindless Lala Harris,
who went to South Korea.
She thinks she's in North Korea.
And she's standing there at the DMZ border,
the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea.
And she said this.
So the United States shares a very important relationship, which is an alliance with the Republic of North Korea.
And it is an alliance that is strong and enduring.
Yeah, an enduring relationship with North Korea.
Coming soon after Pyongyang's fired two short-range ballistic missiles
into the sea as a warning to South Korea,
who is our ally, Lala,
Vice President Lala held a much-anticipated press conference
on the Korean Peninsula's demilitarized zone on Thursday,
standing on the southern side of the demarcation line,
opposite of which North Korean soldiers kept a close watch on the proceedings.
She gave a speech hailing the, quote,
ironclad commitment of the U.S. to its allies in the region,
and that's when she made the unfortunate, deeply awkward gaffe
touting the strong alliance with the Republic of North Korea.
Well, I can imagine why she thinks that they're allies.
Because if we follow their policies, if we follow the Marxist policies
of the Biden administration, we will turn into North Korea.
For years, I've talked about the fact that all these people love to say,
well, you know, communism is great.
It's just never been tried.
I said, well, yes, it has.
We've had two very long, wonderful experiments, if you will, if you're not part of the experiment.
It's given us a lot of wonderful information.
Let's put it that way.
North and South Korea, East and West Germany.
And you've probably seen the
satellite pictures, you know, of the Korean peninsula there. You can see South Korea is all
lit up. North Korea is all dark. They don't have anything. They have tyranny and poverty and
slavery. And the same thing was true in East Germany. You have a couple of experiments where
you cut the country in half all of a sudden, and you take exactly the same people, same culture, same abilities, same interests, same everything. And you put them
under two different political and economic systems and look at what happens. Yes, communism has been
tried. And I can understand that she would want to see North Korea as the allies of the Democrats
and people like Gavin Newsom.
Meanwhile, the other part of the La La team, Joe Biden,
has appointed the first ever envoy for plants and animals.
Is this Dr. Doolittle? Dr. Doolittle, PhD.
The Biden administration announced Wednesday that it is appointing
a special diplomat
to oversee international animal and plant habitats for the first time.
This is going to be an all-of-government effort, they said,
to represent the interests of plants and animals.
Because, you know, if you appoint yourself, if you're the self-appointed advocate for plants and animals, then, you know, who's going to oppose that, right? I mean, the plants
and animals, is this democracy? They don't get a vote. But you've appointed yourself as their
representatives, and so you speak on their behalf. And if anybody has a problem with what you have
to say, then they have a problem with plants and animals and they're attacking plants and animals.
Well, you know, the plants and animals are going to be under attack from the Biden administration.
I've given you the biotech plan.
That is what is all of government.
They have enlisted all of government to push biotechnology and genetically modifying organisms.
They've made that an all-of-government program.
And that's going to be a threat to all of us.
All of us.
Meanwhile, we have, this is kind of interesting.
I did a report on this about a decade ago.
There was a movie that came out, and it had Robin Wright in it,
and it posited an idea where, um, she actually kind of played herself and, uh, it was a very
surrealistic movie.
I can't remember the name of it, but, um, uh, she takes a retirement from, uh, making
movies and has, uh, a digital twin of herself.
And I said, yeah, you know, this is not going to be long before this actually happens in reality. And so, you know, she tried to get back in and some other things happened and that type of herself. And I said, yeah, you know, this is not going to be long before this actually
happens in reality. And so, you know, she tried to get back in and some other things happened and
that type of stuff. But now it actually is happening with Bruce Willis. Bruce Willis has
sold rights to allow a deep, deep fake digital twin of himself to be created. Yeah. You know,
maybe this is already being done. You know, we had that situation with
Biden. Remember where there was a couple of clips that came out, one of them looked very much like
Biden. And then the other one, it was very stiff and stern and people zoomed in on it. And the
speaking Biden did not blink, you know, for a very, very, very long time.
It was like a minute or two minutes or something, absolutely unblinking and kind of wooden.
And a lot of people said, is this a digital twin of him?
Well, it remains to be seen.
I mean, maybe the twin of Bruce Willis will be blinking.
We'll have to wait and see.
The world learned on Wednesday that Hollywood legend Bruce Willis, 67, would retire due to his diagnosis of aphasia. That's
happened a while back. But what is new
is that
he is going to
license that
to a lot of people. I wonder if
and they already showed in the article, they showed
how they already used
the digital twin of him in a Russian
commercial.
I wonder if they're going to do the 67-year-old Bruce Willis or if they'll do like the 30-something
Bruce Willis that did Die Hard.
If they're going to do a digital twin, I would imagine that they might want to go with a
30-year-old version.
Sergey, thank you very much.
Thank you for the tip.
He said, when my family still lived in Soviet union.
They were jaw dropped to see grocery stores full of food when they moved to America.
Unfortunately, it doesn't look like that anymore.
Yeah, that's right.
Uh, yeah, they, they couldn't believe the choice because, uh, you know, if you have
central planners, they're going to give you one choice.
And now we're seeing that with a lot of different things, right?
You only got one choice for your healthcare. Get a vaccine. You're going to have you one choice. And now we're seeing that with a lot of different things, right? You only got one choice for your health care.
Get a vaccine.
You're going to have one choice for your transportation.
Get a battery electric vehicle and on and on.
That is just central planning and communism to the nth degree.
Thank you very much for the support.
I appreciate that.
Is the Earth being pummeled by derelict alien spacecraft.
Well, that was an interesting headline.
And it may be clickbait,
but it's interesting the way the scientists are thinking
and the way they look at this.
And here's what is at the basis of this.
They said between 1957 and 1968,
scientists decided to try their hand
at creating new minerals
that could act as very effective
conductors of electricity.
As a matter of fact,
they created these hybrid minerals.
They're superconductors.
And so they created,
they invented a pair of them,
a hideite,
if I'm pronouncing that correctly,
and a brazenite.
They should make these things so they're more easily understandable how to pronounce them.
But let's just say these two things.
We'll call them H and B.
After a few years, the same minerals, though, unexpectedly started showing up in fragments of meteorites that had landed on the
earth. As it turns out, these weren't materials that had to be invented, though how they were
able to be formed outside of the lab remained a mystery to scientists. Now, six decades later,
a Venezuelan researcher is trying to connect the dots between these minerals that scientists made at a great deal of effort in the lab
and the same minerals that came crashing to Earth from space.
Maybe, just maybe, those superconducting minerals that came from space
were also artificial, they said.
And it could be evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence.
You think?
You know, we have a program, SETI,
Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.
We've had situations, and they monitor listening for radio signals
that they think would be created by intelligence and just not natural.
So they're not random.
They're repeating pattern or something like that.
Years earlier, there was a big thing when they found quasars.
They said, look, we're getting radio signals.
And eventually, it was on a regular basis.
And so they thought that it was some kind of an intelligent signal.
But it turned out that the quasars were just, you know,
electromagnetically polarized.
They had different poles, and as they were rotating around,
it caused an electromagnetic signal that was repeating.
And because it was repeating and it wasn't random,
they thought that it was an intelligent signal that was out there,
but it was just these things rotating.
That was a quasar.
But you know, they have spent so much money
with the search for extraterrestrial intelligence
and all the rest of it.
Just look at your body.
Look inside of you.
Look at the DNA.
Look at the structures, the machines,
and the machines within machines
within machines inside your body and
Ask yourself, you know how that happened
As I said before, you know, it's probably about 20 to 25 years ago
You had Michael Bay he who wrote a book Darwin's black box Darwin said
Hi, my theory
I just nothing in my theory explains how even the eye could come into existence
because it has so many components and it's so intricate in its design
and it all has to be there at once.
And so Michael Behe said, you know,
there's a lot more complicated black boxes inside of black boxes inside of black boxes
and we can now see that.
We can see the DNA.
And of course, Crick and Watson, when they discovered DNA, they said, look at this. This is a code. It's an error-correcting
code. It's a computer code. It's signs of intelligence. They could see that it was
intelligent design. Crick and Watson, the inventors, the discoverers of DNA, they didn't
invent it. They just discovered it. They, however, would not admit that it was God.
So instead, they created in their minds some kind of extraterrestrial intelligence that would come to Earth.
They called it panspermia.
They would come to Earth, and they were the ones who initiated all life on Earth, and then they went away.
Well, where did they come from, right?
What they did was they invented a God, but they didn't have any philosophical explanation
for how God could exist apart from what was there.
Well, you know, when we look at it as Christians, we understand.
Logos, the Greek term that's translated the word, in the beginning was the
word. That has a double meaning. It has kind of a Hebrew meaning as well as a Greek meaning. The
Greek meaning means kind of, you know, the Hebrew meaning is like the word of God. But
when you look at the Greek meaning, it really means kind of design, intelligence, and that
type of thing. So in the beginning, really, there was really means kind of design, intelligence, and that type of thing.
So in the beginning, really, there was information and there was design,
and we shouldn't be surprised about that.
But these people are looking for alien technosignatures because they will rule out God.
And so they're trying to make gods out of aliens.
So these two substances, we'll call them B and H, are special, not the least because they're very, very conductive, possibly even superconductive. Electricity, in other words, passes through them
without really any resistance. That's what a superconductor does. But they think that these
things are so odd with their unique formulations and with their layering that there is a good
chance that they're manufactured. But they won't acknowledge that the DNA is manufactured.
Even the discoverers would acknowledge that, even though they would not acknowledge God,
they would acknowledge that.
The genesis of these meteoric minerals could require a controlled and sophisticated process
that is not easily found in nature.
And again, we see that all around us.
And to try to explain this away,
this article says, well, look at the math.
You know, we got 100 billion stars in our galaxy alone,
and blah, blah, blah.
They go down the same line of reasoning
that they use to try to say, well, you know,
it's inevitable that there's going to be life
on other planets because just look at how many different planets there are.
So mathematically, it's got to happen.
No, it doesn't.
There's nothing about that.
I mean, you know, the whole thing about, well, you've got a monkey that is going to sit at
a typewriter.
If you give them enough time, if you had an infinite amount of time, that monkey would
write a Shakespeare play.
Anybody that tells you that doesn't understand the cumulative probability
that just adding time does not do anything about that.
So we have Google harnessing quantum mechanics
at their California lab.
Yeah, they're going to try to, uh, rehabilitate Steve
Pachinik. Now quantum computing is a, is a thing. It's just not a, it's just not a thing on watermark
ballots and all the rest of that stuff. Um, uh, but, um, yeah, that's, uh, that's another one of
these fields where if you think that you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand it.
You have particles that seem to be communicating with each other and responding alike at the same time without any discernible way to understand that.
They don't understand.
None of it makes any sense even to the people who study it.
And yet they can still use that to do technology,
even though they don't understand how it works. Well, we understand how social media works. We
see Twitter is hiding all video and search results for Georgia Maloney, the Italian prime minister,
because she had the audacity to talk about herself as an Italian, as a mother,
as a Christian.
Those things are threats, aren't they?
And yet Twitter, that is so worried about hiding that, is now facing an ad boycott by
major brands who said they were absolutely horrified to see their product turning up
on Twitter next to child porn.
Companies like Dyson, Mazda, Forbes, and even PBS Kids.
I wouldn't think the PBS Kids would care about that.
They like to push porn on kids.
Anyway, they suspended their marketing campaigns and removed ads from parts of Twitter
because their promotions are featured next to tweets soliciting child pornography. So Twitter will allow people who talk about, well, we're
minor attracted persons. Yeah, we don't actually act on it, but we just are obsessed with, you
know, pedophilia, but we don't act on it. We really don't. Well, it's just a matter of time, right?
As a man thinks, so is he.
If they are obsessed with that,
they're constantly thinking about that,
they're going to act on that.
And they're going to recruit other people to act on it.
But Twitter says, oh, we're going to draw the line.
We let people talk about this all the time.
So Twitter has no problems with child pornography.
They have no problems with people talking about how they're attracted to minors
and all the rest of this stuff.
But they do have a problem with an elected national leader
who talks about God and family and country.
They have a big problem with that.
And she's not perfect.
Look, one of the first things she did
when she came out was to declare
her loyalty to NATO and to the Ukrainian war.
So she's not perfect.
But the reality is that these people
are focused like a laser beam
on removing this.
And it's not just Twitter.
It's also YouTube.
And so they don't care about the stuff that is dragging our society down,
but don't have anybody put up anything about God, country, or family.
Elizabeth Warren has turned her attention from the crumbling economy
to the pending vacuum cleaner company acquisition acquisition.
This is from zero hedge.
While the federal reserve is in the midst of nuking the U S economy and the
stock market.
And as inflation is running rampant,
Senator Elizabeth Warren has turned her focus away from berating Jerome Powell
to vacuum cleaner.
She's very concerned about the fact that Amazon is going to be acquiring iRobot.
And so this is, as we typically see, she's going to try to distract people from what Biden is
doing, the Biden administration is doing, by focusing on corporations. And of course,
the Biden administration is more than happy to do that. Everybody in the Biden administration, Jennifer Granholm and the energy department, the rest of
them, when Biden puts sanctions on energy, when he shuts down pipelines, when he perhaps even
blows pipelines up and the price of energy goes skyrocketing, what do they do? They demonize the
people who actually produce the corporations that actually produce the energy.
It's a tried and true program of misdirection, of a red herring,
because they know that the economy is their Achilles heel.
And things are continuing to ramp up in spite of the fact that he's using the SPR as a campaign credit card.
Thanks for listening.
The Common Man They created Common Core
to dumb down our children.
They created Common Past
to track and control us.
Their Commons Project
to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most
powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything
about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what
they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at
thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com.