The David Knight Show - 31Oct24 UNABRIDGED Contrast of Light vs Samhain; When Pigs Flu; Why Climate Models Don't Work - CO2 Absorption is Wrong;

Episode Date: October 31, 2024

"They loved darkness rather than the light" - the CONTRAST between light and dark on this Halloween as the world increasingly embraces paganismWho needs Halloween when Scottish government says there's 24 genders and Brittany Spears marries herself?Plant absorption of CO2 underestimated by 31%.  Is THIS why ALL their models and predictions have failed for nearly 60 years?  Why there's ZERO TRUTH in "Net Zero" narrativePandemic Pig (with lipstick) Did they REALLY find "bird flu" in a pig? Just so you know…Testing embryos for IQ — the next step in eugenics is here as mainstream media covers the experience of a wealthy couple who demanded their surrogate have an abortion because of a social media pictureINTERVIEW Tony Arterburn on the election and precious metals post-election, both near term and long termFull description with topics by timecode to follow TOPICS by TIMECODE (2:00) War & Grocery Inflation — Guns OR Butter?A timeless tale of military government corruption and waste - taken to new extremes as military industrial complex monopoly intensifiesDrones vs tanks and the future of warThe cost of war comes home - even before war comes to our shore(36:56) Halloween - Politically Correct Costumes, Paganism & the Occult, the Contrast Between Light and DarkIt seems like Halloween year round now, but there's an extra layer of insanity about costume rulesWho needs Halloween when Scottish government says there's 24 genders and Brittany Spears marries herself?(47:04) God's Glory in the Contrast with the OccultEx-Psychic's warning about the occult and "harmless" entry pointsSamhain, the pagan origin, is getting big in IrelandGod's glory is in the contrast between light and dark(1:05:42) Media Puts Lipstick on the "Pandemic Pig"MSM tells us a pig has bird flu — we deconstruct the lies"Godfather" of vaccines who experimented on children he said "who are human in form but not in social potential?"Sabin, SV40 and the origins of the callous, murderous vaccine business(1:30:22) NIH & Governments Worldwide Conspire to "Nudge" You — carefully planned and targeted propaganda schemes (1:43:54) INTERVIEW Tony Arterburn - How Election is Likely to Affect Precious Metals Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight.goldBRICS influence on commoditiesCentral bank purchases projected to soar predicts major bankWhat is likely to happen to gold, silver, bitcoin post-election both near term and long term?(2:21:29) The next step in eugenics is here "Creating Future People"Testing embryos for IQMainstream media covers the experience of a wealthy couple who demanded their surrogate have an abortion because of a social media pictureChristian asks voters: "Can you live with the blood of millions of babies on your hands".  Well, abortion is not the only issue there.  How about the bioweapon jab and the endless wars?(2:52:38) Censorship is now extending to entire websites being taken down and the internet archive being taken down.  Who's behind it?  Will Trump fix it?If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy. I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough.

You can find Happy Enough wherever you listen to podcasts. At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Goal Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor. Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 31st of October, Year of Our Lord 2024. Well, it's also Halloween, and so we're going to talk about what the new rules are for trannies and the left. What can you dress as? What can you not dress as?

And we're going to contrast the darkness with the light as well. And we've also had some new science actually done. They've discovered that they mis-underestimated, as George Bush would say, the CO2 absorption by plants. Well, that throws all their models off. Maybe that's why they've been wrong for nearly 60 years on all of these climate models. And we're told that a pig now has bird flu. Yes, that's right. A pig flu. Yes, that's right, a pig flu. Well, look at the assumptions of that.

And also, they're back pushing the nudge. I said from the very beginning, there wasn't any science to this except for behavioral science. Well, we're going to begin with an old story. Pentagon Waste and Endless Wars. We'll be right back well as i've said it's just an old story but uh it just keeps going on and on there's no end to it pentagon paid nearly eight thousand percent markup on boeing's bathroom soap dispenser this is not the six hundred dollar toilet seat this is much

worse they're taking things that you or i would pick up for $20, $30 and costing thousands of dollars. And folks, this is Boeing. And this is an example of just how corrupt and spoiled this monopolistic defense industry chain has become. Boeing can't do anything right. Their planes are falling apart literally in the air uh their spacecraft is leaking like a sieve and had to be abandoned had to abandon the astronauts who are still not back and this is part of it this is how government welfare destroys everything including once efficient corporations they used to be the standard, and now they are the example

of what happens when we have government corruption, welfare programs. The bathroom on the C-17 Globemaster III cargo plane is nothing special. The soap dispensers are exactly the same kind of pump that customers would find in a civilian airliner, in a restaurant bathroom, in your own kitchen kitchen there's nothing different about it at all and yet they put a 7,943 percent markup on it costing taxpayers 149,000 more than it should have been but that's just the beginning of it there was a whistleblower that went to the u.s government and told them how they were being overcharged. And so they had a two-year audit of the Boeing company,

and surprisingly, nobody sent a missile through the Pentagon window that was doing the audit, like 9-11. Out of a selected sample of 46 spare parts, the Pentagon's internal watchdog found the Air Force overpaid for 12 of them, about a quarter, well, more than a quarter. quarter i'm sorry a little less than a quarter um costing taxpayers an additional million dollars on top of the parts 4.3 million value uh so in 2015 the pentagon found that it was severely overpaying for patriotot missiles. They negotiated a new contract at that point in time that saved them a half a billion dollars, $550 million. In 2019, the inspector general found that the military was paying $4,300 for a half-inch

metal drive pen that should have cost $46. How does a half-inch metal drive pen cost $46 in the first place? That's what I want to know. but they charge 100 times more than that uh soap dispensers again this is uh the headline article the one that they picked to put up at the top because you could pick any number of these things um the air force did not validate the accuracy of the data they They said, because they were just looking at the prices that subcontractors are charging and just, you know, well, if they're not really marking that up, we're okay with it. Uh, so again, you know, oh, well, uh, this, this, uh, this metal

drive pension across 46, I don't know how to leave it have cost $46. I don't know how it even should cost $46. But if it's not marked up strictly by Boeing, I guess they don't find it. But see, part of the problem is that there's a revolving door, as we've seen. Lloyd Austin, who is now the Secretary of Defense for the Biden administration, had to change the rules so he could come back. Usually that revolving door only goes in one direction just like it you know the buildings you know usually only goes in one direction they had to go in and do an operation so the revolving door could go back the other direction again you know why is this type of thing happening why is it that you've got people in the pentagon that are just approving this kind

of absurd cost well because they hope to go to work for these companies when they get out, and they do. It's a revolving door, just like it is with FDA and pharma. And it is consolidation, corruption, monopolistic stuff, as they point out. These types of soap dispensers, you can buy them online for $30. But they marked it up 8,000%. Even tape. So they went through, they found bearings, screws, gaskets, lights, even tape. Inspector General says Boeing overcharged $2,664 for some tape.

And this is the way you can sneak stuff in. You notice these are all nondescript things, right? Screws, gaskets, lights, tapes. That was something that we had an employee who was a trusted manager who did that with us. I caught him. I had the ability back in the 90s to be able to log in and watch what was happening on the computers

and check the sales and stuff. And he was very clever about it. He would do it on other people's shift, not on his own. And he left us and went to work for a pizza place next door. And he came in. He was stealing from us when he was working for the pizza place. He just came in and said, hey, you want to take a and um uh i'll relieve you a little bit if you want to get something to eat oh yeah great thanks you know and i didn't know he was on the clock and he's

he goes in and what he did was he took bubble gum and he knew that we didn't inventory the bubble gum stuff that we sold for like a penny and or whatever some nominal amount maybe a nickel or something like that and so he put the price in as negative and he sold a whole bunch of these things and then he took the difference in cash and i caught him on it that's what they do they'll go in and they'll take something that is nondescript like that. So in an interview with 60 Minutes last year, a former Raytheon contract negotiator, not Lloyd Austin. He's not honest enough to do this. It was somebody other than Lloyd Austin who worked for Raytheon.

He was director of defense pricing. He blamed a lack of competition. He said in the 80s, there was intense competition with a lot of different companies. And so the government had choices. They had leverage, but we have limited leverage now. Why? Because they allowed these companies to consolidate. And so you've only got a couple of them.

You don't have competition between companies anymore. You don't really have oversight. Well, there's going to be a whole new wave of spending. As I've talked about this several times, I said, you know, Eric Schmidt, the ex-CEO of Google, is now the big guy in the Pentagon, especially. He's all about AI. He's there all the time, but especially on military stuff. And if you remember, and I've forgotten the guy's name now, but the book was The Four Battlegrounds. Everything about it was oriented towards we're going to war with China. And so here's the four battlegrounds we're going to go to war with China on.

And I had the guy in because of what he had to say about AI and the progress on it, how they were testing it, what the limitations were. Because I talk about AI many times, i'm very concerned about the fact i use it helps me to remember the three things uh spc right and so we have surveillance we have propaganda we have censorship and that's really the way they're using the generative ai that's on social media and that type of stuff but then there's another part of it and that is the killer so i guess we could say spck the killer robots the killer autonomous drone swarms and that type of thing and so that's what uh schmidt is pushing he's there in the pentagon uh trying to get them

to change over and i've also mentioned in the past before a book by Daniel Suarez. As a matter of fact, two things in the news today that harken back to books by Daniel Suarez. This guy is kind of like Michael Crichton. They really should make his movies, his books into movies, but they're not. Maybe they're too close to what these guys are planning on doing to even be predictive. Maybe they're descriptive as to what they're doing. And we're going to talk about how there's a U S company now that is doing, doing IVF and using it for eugenics has already started screening for IQ and that type of thing.

That was in another book that he did. But I was in change agent and kill decision uh he was talking about swarms of autonomous drones and how they would communicate with each other they went out they got somebody who was an expert in uh how insects do swarms we talked a little bit about this the other day when shiva was on you know they kind of move as a unit it isn't that they're just keying off of each other's movements when it comes to insects. And so that was kind of the basic theory. But the whole point is, and it's kind of a spoiler alert,

this is being in the book, it is a complete paradigm shift. And it is something that allows the entire military industrial complex to just reset itself from the very beginning. And all new, all the old weapons are now obsolete. And we're going to buy all new stuff. Right? Well, the ex-Google CEO Schmidt is urging the army to replace tanks with drones. Remember a few weeks ago, is it now four or five weeks since we've had the hurricane? And we were talking about the lithium mine.

We were talking about the Pentagon being involved in that lithium mine. And I said, you know, they want to have lithium batteries and they're manic about that at the Pentagon. And they want to get involved in this thing that's happening in, uh, in North Carolina.

Uh, they're not looking for lithium batteries to power tanks. I said, it's about the drones. And there we are. It is about the drones. Google's former chief executive officer, Eric Schmidt, is urging the U.S. military to replace the fleets of useless tanks, he calls them, with drones powered by AI.

He said, I read somewhere that the U.S. had thousands and thousands of tanks stored somewhere. He said, give them away. Buy a drone instead. Well, of course, they're not going to give them away. What they'll do is they'll start wars and sell them to both sides. That's the Pentagon model, right? We'll have a war over here and now you can buy our tanks, which are obsolete. We do sell our obsolete weapons to people. Schmidt founded a startup building autonomous kamikaze drones for Ukraine. According to reports by Forbes, he told the gathering that the Ukraine-Russian war has demonstrated how a $5,000 drone can destroy a five million dollar tank ukraine has been using cheap off-the-shelf drones to counter russia's military supremacy but tanks have also been central to the fight

the israel hamas war has also seen israel which possesses scores of sophisticated drones rely on infantry forces and deploy thousands of tanks to g Strip in parallel with the air raids. And so they still have a use, I guess, especially in asymmetric war where the civilians don't have much to fight back with. But when you look at the rapid change of all this, you see the pictures of the tanks with kind of a, it looks like they've got like a trashy lean-to house on top of the tank to try to have the drone explode a little distance away from the tank so it doesn't penetrate the tank.

And they're also putting up now videos of Russia dropping nets to catch the drone. So this is something that is in its infancy. Kind of like watching the beginning of the 20th century, the development of aerial warfare. And so that's where these drones are right now. Schmidt was the inaugural chair of the U.S. Defense Innovation Board, advising senior defense leaders on how they could come up with autonomous killer robots and drones.

He also led the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, which in 2023 made recommendation to Congress on how to best deploy AI for national security and defense. Ukraine and Russia drone tactics are changing every three to six weeks as the two rush to innovate. The cost of autonomy is falling so quickly that the drone war, which is the future of conflict, will eventually get rid of tanks, artillery, and mortars, said Schmidt.

Still, he indicates that he thinks the government, the armed forces in the West, will be slow to adapt to the autonomous killer robots. Well, how does this affect us at home, right? Again, we're going to just, you know, change, scrap all this stuff, give them away. Maybe they'll sell them. Who knows?

And they'll buy all new weapons. Well, there was an interesting article on American Conservative about war and the cost of groceries. You know, we always hear this guns and butter argument. You know, what do you do? Do you, do you build infrastructure?

Do you build a defense and that type of thing? Well, we're literally talking about butter price of food, um, on, uh, CNN's town hall when Lala was being interviewed, um,

as they write here, she was asked a pretty straightforward question about progressives recoiling from the Biden administration's apparent inability or unwillingness to use U.S. leverage with Israel to bring an end to the civilian carnage in Gaza. And she said, well, okay, but staying on the couch and not voting at all because of this issue, she said, I'm not going to deny the strong feelings that people have. I don't know that anyone who has seen the images who would not have strong feelings about what has happened. But, but forget about that.

I also do know that for many people who care about this issue, they also care about bringing down the price of groceries. And he says, although this is done as a rhetorical side of hand, let's talk about something else. He said, these things are not unrelated. So you want to abruptly shift from the deaths of nearly 43,000 people, the displacement of nearly an entire population of over 2 million in the Gaza Strip, and start talking about milk and bread at the grocery store. So it's kind of cringy, but they're one in the same. If you don't think that sending billions of dollars of weapons to Israel, after years of sending arms and cash to Ukraine, that that doesn't in some way affect Americans' consternation at the cash register, then we need to talk, he says. In 2021, the average American family, the middle 20% of income earners,

paid $17,900 in taxes to federal, state, and local governments. Of that, $10,391 went to Washington and the federal bureaucracy. By the way, the middle 20% is the family that's earning between $46,000 and $78,000 a year. And they're having to send $10, the government and guess what that is nowhere close to what's being spent as they're sending a quarter of their income uh their gross income to the government uh to the federal government and um you know uh even more than that to uh uh with all the taxes that we pay it doesn't come close to paying for what the government is spending we are going further and further in debt ourselves and our children and our grandchildren

even though they're taking a quarter to a half of what we make as many people have said god only asked for 10 percent right when israel was a nation um in the old testament so buying on, a credit card, well, the interest rates are in the stratosphere. Yeah, they're not going to do anything about that usury stuff. Banks are going to get whatever they want, and they're going to be left alone. It doesn't matter if they can get the money for free from the Federal Reserve. They'll charge you 20, 30, 40, 50% on the credit card. We used to lock people up for doing that. That used to be the game of organized crime well

it actually is still the game of organized crime and they still do wear the nicest suits you know not just the mafia uh since the hamas attacks on october the 7th the u.s has given israel nearly 18 billion in aid 17.9 this includes the annual 3.8 million, billion rather, Israel normally gets, plus the $14 billion supplemental package passed by Congress in April. Typically, Congress would have to approve each major weapons system, but they've got a way to get around that. The Biden administration has been very inventive in terms of getting around any rules, laws, or congressional approval. The Biden administration this year has greenlit hundreds under the $25 million threshold for reporting to Congress.

So tons of weapons have literally flown to Israel under the radar of the legislative branch, and the cost of war report suggests that much of this was never included in the $18 billion total. Now think about this. This is Joe Biden, who has accepted bribes and laundered money and not paid his taxes on stuff from Ukraine. He's a criminal. He knows how this stuff works. This is somebody who in his administration decided that he was going to start having banks report on us if we had a $600 transaction. Remember that? It used to be like $10,000 or something. And that was years and years ago when we were in business. They might have adjusted that for inflation, but he took it down to $600. And then what is he doing? He's structuring transfers to Israel by keeping them under the reporting limit of 25 million.

What a criminal he is. So, yeah, we're not going to file that, yeah, that TPS report. Let's not do that. This is like structuring deposits. This is what they sent Dennis Hastert to jail for. Actually, he was structuring deposits this is this is what they sent um dennis haster to jail for actually he was structuring withdrawals which they shouldn't even worry about that uh but uh you know they didn't send him to jail for pedophilia although the judge referenced that that's really what he was being sent to jail for for a short period of time but uh you know

it cuts both ways that's why he was picked to be a Republican in Congress and why he was made the Speaker of the House for the Republicans for the longest amount of time was because he was blackmailable and a pedophile. But then when somebody blackmailed him and he tried to take the money out, then they sent him to jail for structured withdrawal. Anyway, Israel is not trying to save money in an effort to destroy Hamas.

By May of this year, Israel had dropped more weight in bombs than what was laid waste to Hamburg, Dresden, and London combined during World War II. As of December, Israel had fired 29,000 air-to-surface missiles at Gaza. Only half of them were precision-guided. The rest were American-made dumb bombs that indiscriminately destroy whatever they fall on. At that point, some 18,000 people had been killed and 51,000 wounded in a matter of two months. In addition to the tens of thousands of missiles and bombs, all the way up to the 2,000-pound variety,

shells, tanks, rounds, small arms, defense systems, shoulder-fired rockets, F-35 fighter aircraft, army vehicles, even fuel provided by the U.S. Gave Israel its most advanced missile system as well, the THAAD, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, which costs anywhere from $1 to $2 billion per battery. Are they worried about climate change? No. All these explosions and fuel jets and all the rest of the stuff,

with all these wars everywhere? No, they don't have to worry about that. And you don't have to worry about climate change when it comes to electricity being used for AI to do surveillance, propaganda, and censorship. You don't have to worry about that either. Isn't that great? Just like China doesn't have to worry about it, India don't have to worry about that either. Isn't that great? Just like China doesn't have to worry about it, India doesn't have to worry about it,

the surveillance state doesn't have to worry about it, the military-industrial complex doesn't have to worry about it, the Pentagon doesn't have to worry about it, but you should not be allowed to have meat. And you will not be able to afford meat because they're at war with us in that area, in that sphere as well. And the excuse is climate change, right?

With all of these explosions, all this money that is being wasted, all these lives that are being wasted. It's been estimated that Washington spent an additional $4.9 billion increasing its own military presence in the Middle East last year, including leading a coalition of countries against the Houthi attacks 4.9 billion dollars increasing its own military presence in the middle east last year including leading a coalition of countries against the hoodie attacks and commercial shipping in the red sea i know that should be hoothy hoothy i just have to call it hooty like hooty and the blowfish because they're they're blowing the fish out of the water too rather than use the leverage

listen to this rather than use the leverage of all these billions of dollars that are being given to Israel, rather than trying to use that as a lever to try to get a ceasefire, the U.S. appears to be content to fire off $2 million missiles at cheap, hoothy weapons that seem to be in endless supply over the last year. Does anybody ask how long can America take it? And we're just talking about the economic aspects of it, the bankrupt aspect of it.

What about when they are successful in terms of bringing violence to our shores and to our country? We're not isolated from this. And they're doing everything they can to expose us to it, leave the borders wide open. Come on. Everybody come in, especially young single men, whatever. Well, they'll print more money. They'll raise the taxes.

They'll give us an army of IRS agents. They'll use AI to scrutinize every single aspect of our bank accounts. Higher prices at the grocery store are just one aspect. I said it might be easier to stomach if we knew that our hard-earned income was not being sent to fight other governments' battles with no effort or influence put into ending them. And it also might be easier if we knew that it wasn't being used to kill children and continue on with the war.

I had a listener who has been a listener for a very long time said, I understand you oppose your country's involvement in foreign wars, and I completely agree with your reasoning. However, it's difficult not to share the joy of these Iranians who were seen dancing on the roof after the Israelis attacked. So what's going on with that? Well, if we go back and we look at the American involvement in Iran, we went back in the 1950s and started the coup. It's interesting, the people, part of the propaganda is determining where the beginning point is going to be, right?

If your beginning point for what is going on in Iran is when they took over the embassy, which is what they want everybody to think of. And nobody thought about it wrong before that. It was just always, there was always a Shaw in Iran, right? Well, no, never. Yeah. Ron Iraq.

These are constructs after world war two, you know, these ancient people groups that were there, the Babylonians, the Persians, the Medes, the Medes, Kurdistan, everything, but they split them up between these two so they didn't really have a homeland they're fighting everybody trying to get a homeland uh the iranians came out of the persians iraq came out of the babylonians but um you know they make these arbitrary distinctions and then when they get a leader a left-leaning leader, who wants to do something with you all, the CIA takes him out and puts him in the Shah of Iran

in a brutal regime that was there. And then that brutal regime, and there were a lot of people, it was a very Western country there under the Shah for a couple of decades, but the brutality of the Shah and the CIA, uh, training and torture, uh, that blew back and they wound up with the Ayatollah and, uh, they went, got even worse. that a lot of them are Christians. A lot of them want to have a free and open society. They don't want to have this Islamic rules and religious police like they're in Saudi Arabia on everybody's back, beating and arresting in the case of Saudi Arabia,

killing people. I don't know that the Iranians chop off heads like the Saudis do. But still, a lot of them really hate their own government, which is a blowback because of what the CIA did. And again, it goes back to our involvement. These people are dancing on the roof. They're likely going to be collateral damage in a war. As Christians, as Christians, we should be trying to stop these wars on a moral basis. As Americans, we should be fed up with the cost of this, even if it's only the cost in dollars, if we don't even care about the lives that are there. He says, I agree with you on netanyahu's lack of moral fiber um uh well so do the many of the

people israel as well he says uh though not at all with your belief about the origins of the ashkenazis and i don't really care about that and yeah ethnic groups don't matter to me not hell i care about at all i know gerald does i don't care about it at all. But he says, I find it difficult to fault his decision to retaliate. And I don't fault his decision to retaliate. I fault his decision to continue this conflict for over a year with a stated goal of killing every man, woman, and child. That's genocide. So they can have land and saying, well, we're headed to Damascus next. Right?

They're on a crusade of endless war for conquering, killing civilians for land. I don't support that. I won't support it. I will never support that. And I will not support that as a Christian. And I don't care what your eschatology is. You're not going to convince me that your eschatology, even if you got it right, overrules the clear moral principles for Christians.

And so that's where I come stand on all of this stuff. But thank you, Giles, and thank you for your support over the years. And he finishes it with a nice comment, so I really do appreciate that. And had an email from Texas Freedom Forever. It said, during Shiva's interview, you said, outsourcing tyranny. You need to write an article with that title. I do. I need to write some articles, period. But I think that is the way that we should view this stuff.

When we look at whether it's censorship, they outsource the tyranny. They use these private corporations as a beard. Oh, it's censorship, they outsource the tyranny. They use these private corporations as a beard. Oh, it's not us. It's private corporations, except they're giving the orders to the private corporations. They're giving money to the private corporations. And we see it happening again with the flock surveillance cameras. Oh, it's not us. It's those private corporations creating a massive national and international network

of geospatial intelligence to track and to anticipate your every move. This is something that the U.S. government has been working on for decades, just like they worked on the internet for decades, just like they wanted to have total information awareness and they wanted to have your life log. But then they, and people say, oh, you don't want the government keeping a life log. Okay, well, great, Facebook. How about that?

That'll be life log. So they are outsourcing the tyranny and pretending it's not coming from them. And we know full well where it's coming from. We always knew that the censorship was coming from the government, even before we saw the documents. And now that we've seen the documents, you still have the same liars and crooks who are doing this stuff ignoring it pretending that uh they don't know anything about that i'll just say one more thing too i got this is from texas swift said about a year ago you had a show with a brilliant rant

about i hate trump i hate tucker hate wayne allen root hate Wayne Allen Root. They did it for the money. They did it for politics. Uh, they're, they're Judas goats and everything. And so, um, I looked at that and I thought, wow, maybe I need to kind of tone it down. I don't know what this thing was, but, um, I, I look at it and of course, you know, we can always, I always have to look at what we do and we have to, um, think of it, you know you know whenever we get angry we always think we're justified in it right but i do think that as this continues to go on we have to warn people i was just talking the other day about how artificial intelligence is being used to scam people they nearly used it to scam as a scam to take people's property i mean should we talk about that type of thing you You know, what if somebody is ripping people off, stealing their homes,

stealing their bank accounts? Um, should we continue? Should we just say, well, okay. I don't want to sound hateful to warn people about that. I mean,

I look at this and I've made the analogy as well with the shots. I said, we've got some guys on the top of a building and he's shooting people in the street. You don't give them a pass, even if it's Donald Trump, right? And you got to warn people about that. And if you know who did it, you got to warn people about that person. Don't give them another rifle. Don't give them another four years. and i'm not saying vote for lala either look there's no good um choice there's not anybody that i will vote for but if you want to vote for

one of them fine just don't endorse either one of them because they're clearly immoral i mean if you want to do something in the privacy of the voting booth uh but don't flaunt it out in public okay folks that's all i'm saying uh and yesterday uh while we had the g edward griffin interview i hope you all enjoyed it uh what an interesting life he's had and um a really remarkable man uh we had some tips and i wanted to thank people for that as well uh sprumford thank you very much and he or she writes um love g edward griffin this man along with eustace mullins was responsible for waking me up for our captured monetary system via the federal reserve act of 1913. mr griffin is a model american yes uh don't frag me bro thank you very as much um says please ask mr griffin if he thinks that we're headed to an economic collapse

on the scale of the great depression and his thoughts about the fourth turning great reset. Um, and of course it was a recorded interview, so he didn't get that comment, but, uh, he does think that we are headed for, uh, uh, really awful situation. He made that pretty clear. And, um, uh, so just be prepared, you know, make sure you got skills, make sure you got some supplies, make sure you got relationships, uh, look at things that are happening locally, but more than anything, you need to have a foundation, your relationship with God. And, uh, that's going to get you through a lot of things. It's going to get you through eternity, regardless of what happens.

DG8, thank you for the tip. David, keep up the good work. God bless you and your family. Thank you. Mark C., thank you as well. You like the interview. ACSAB, thank you. And they thank us.

Star Barkley, now a monthly supporter. Thank you very much. And for all of the road. Thank you for all that you do. I appreciate that. He does our, um, I put stuff up on telegram. He said, Karen, please have David give his opinion on ranked choice voting tomorrow. I emailed him about it last night.

Thanks. He did it earlier today. God, you got G ed Gord Griffin on he's a goat. Yes, he really is. Um, and, uh, so yeah, we the the rank choice voting and um and i put that in the description for the show i put the time code for where that was we didn't break it out as a separate um as a separate report because it's kind of short um big daddy cane from yesterday says farmer's insurance canceled my homeowner's policy, said I had a hazardous material seen from satellite photo, all blurred.

I had to appeal by showing photos of the yard and the garage area. Well, hopefully that took care of it. It didn't take care of it for these people that I was talking about yesterday. Three solar panels, I think, and uh liberty mutual believed that it was mildew or something or algae on their roof and they canceled them but it was clearly they even had a um somebody come out and look at it and say look it's solar panels and there's no structural damage at all to the roof but they canceled it for that they were just looking to cancel people uh in california because they've had a lot of

disasters there. And because California, I guess, has put limitations on what they can do in terms of raising rates. So the other alternative is to just cancel you. We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 you're listening to the david knight show about what we are allowed to do by the feminists these people have lots of rules for us to live by they got pronouns for us to use as well uh the war on halloween 2024 you got feminist uh costume ideas this is coming from armageddon pros uh what can you dress up as uh can you use blackface this year don't think so uh and as he points out he says dylan mulvaney gets to prance around in front of cameras, cosplaying femininity with impunity.

But, uh, you better not wear blackface or even sunglasses at night to pay homage to Stevie wonder. That would be racist and ableist. This is the ethos of the social justice banshees who don't want the deplorables to ever have any fun whatsoever. Obviously, being a protected class, trainees are free to dress as however they wish or to undress completely if necessary. Right. Remember, I just it just amazed me. You know, that's what calls up. I'd like to report there's a naked man walking down the street. What? Where is he? Said the police. This woman calls up. I'd like to report there's a naked man walking down the street. What? Where is he? Said the police. This is what happened.

You know, and it's like, oh, it's such and such. Oh, that's just the pride parade. Don't worry about it. So trainees, I have 100% immunity from reproach. But the shoe is on the other foot. It's a hate crime, if it is. The poll found that only a third of respondents approve of blackface,

uh, with Halloween nearing a new you gov survey asked Americans about the Halloween costumes and whether they find certain costumes, by the way, if we talk about blackface, you do know that there are exceptions for Democrats with all this stuff, right? Just like Ralph Northam,

uh, or Justin Trudeau. I, you know, if you are with them politically, they don't care. We should tell you that they really don't care. It's just a political tool of oppression is really what they're talking about. With Halloween coming close. They asked Americans about, uh, their Halloween costumes and whether or not they find certain costumes.

For example, a costume with a realistic gun. Oh, that's not good. Can't have that. Or a cultural costume worn by somebody who is not of that culture. Is that acceptable or unacceptable? Majorities of Americans say the following are acceptable Halloween costumes. A woman dressing up as a man. Yeah, 70% say that's okay.

A man dressing up as a woman, slightly less, but still 65%. A child dressing up in a cultural costume if they're not part of that culture, 62%. And think about this. This is, you know, we still have about a third of the people who think that's not okay. An adult dressing up in a cultural costume if they're not a third of the people who think that's not okay. Um, an adult dressing up in a cultural costume. If they're not a part of the culture, that's falling down to 56%. Fewer say that it's acceptable for a non native American person to dress as a native American person.

Only 52%. Uh, for eight. And again, as I pointed out many times, that was a mascot at our high school. We even had our drum majors didn't wear like a drum major outfit. They had, uh, they dressed them up.

There was a chief. So they dressed them up in this big headdress and they had a spear actually speared the bass drum once though. One of these guys did cause they go out and twirl. He lost his balance and stuck the spear through the bass drum. But, uh, for the most part, they were not clownish. I mean, they, they looked pretty good, but they would, they were shirtless, and they would rub Texas dirt all over them

so they looked red-skinned. And then they would paint them on top of that, and it was oh boy, I tell you, that would really freak people out today, wouldn't it? Try to find some of those pictures and put them up to freak people out. It's not okay for a person who is not transgender to dress as a transgender person. Only 39% of the people supported that.

Or for a person to wear a costume with a realistic looking gun or other weapon. That's even worse. Only 34%. Two-thirds of people don't want you dressing up as a cowboy. I guess you could still dress up as a cowboy i guess that's you know you could still dress up as woody because woody never had a gun right there's a big message with that i talked to my sons about that and watch toy story as kids uh or for a white person to wear black face makeup in order to appear as a black person 33 only would approve of that. Turlock journal says, I confess somewhere out there, a photo may exist

of me wearing a white sheet. And before someone finds it and posted on Twitter, causing floodgates of indignation to open up person says, well, it was Halloween. I was 10 years old. I was short. I was heavy. My mom was a single mom had four kids. She couldn't afford to do it.

So she got a sheet and she cut some holes in it. Uh, and I went as a ghost but she's not saying chill out about this what she says is the biggest fear you should have as a parent should not be about razor blades and candy the urban myth or distracted drivers running over your kids or your kid eating enough Halloween candy to ultimately pay for your family dentist. Next trip to Hawaii. No, what you should be concerned about, she said,

uh, is what your child wears as a costume could derail their chances of getting into college or destroy their career 30 years down the road. Oh, there'll be okay. as long as they're a Democrat. Isn't that amazing? Yeah, don't worry about them getting run over by a car. Worry about how that costume is and if that's going to be shown. Another person says, well, Halloween, it's the best time, the worst of times,

especially if you're a socially conscious feminist. Yeah, on the one hand, you can get candy and you can dress up. But on the other hand, something about dressing up seems to bring out the worst impulses in people. I noticed, uh, just look at the racially insensitive costumes that are popping up every year. So what is a fun loving costume appreciating feminist to do?

Well, we did the vetting for you. These suggestions will save you some trouble figuring out which costume best shows off your passion for gender equality. And so they say you can dress up as AOC or as that soccer lesbian with purple hair. This is a satire with this one. So this is where we are with our society. And it truly is crazy. But it's even crazier in real life sometimes, I guess.

And the Scottish National Party has now come out and said there are 24 different genders. It's Halloween every day, right? You can be whoever, whatever you want to be. You can pretend that you're a different sex and gender. You can pretend that you're different sex and gender. You can pretend that you're a different ethnic group. You know, just don't have any fun with it, I guess. I don't know. Scotland's National Party has been branded disconnected from the real world

after they put up a list of genders with 24 options so you know what you need to do is you got to vote for trump and he'll put an end to this right oh wait a minute he wanted to bring the trannies into his beauty contest oh melania okay she loves all this stuff and she likes porn too and the two of them used to hang out with epstein so yeah we need to have this revival you know my bake is um fine with all this stuff as long as you don't interfere with women's sports listen to this our message to gay americans tonight is this you're free to marry who you want if you want without the government standing in your way. But that doesn't mean that boys get to compete with girls in girls' sports or you do genital mutilation and chemical castration on our children.

Yeah, you know what he's doing, right? They've identified the demographic of women as being a problem for them. So let's throw them a bone. Let's talk about men and women's sports. But everything else, hey hey that's okay right uh so the scottish national party with its 24 different genders they put that list onto a document that was guidance for public bodies in scotland who collect data on sex and gender and it comes after the first minister, John Swinney, in July

confirmed that there were only two genders, but now they are moving away from that silly assertion. Male and female, right? Scottish National Party needs to stop playing to the minority and start governing for the majority by showing some

common sense and focusing on the real priorities of people, They said, and it's, it is pretty amazing when you think about this, you know, 24 genders and they've, um, got fewer people than Tennessee.

Um, you know, they got five and a half million people. Tennessee's got slightly over seven Britney Spears, by the way, here's where this leads. Britney Spears is so confused that she married herself. She dressed up and it wasn't for Halloween.

She dressed up in a wedding dress, took pictures of it. Now this is what Hollywood and this depravity and this, uh, there does to people. Uh, she did a video. She said,

I want to make a major announcement. I have married myself. You know, the person she loves. Uh, and, but the question is with britney spears will this marriage last will the uh personalities split off in different directions um she said it was the most brilliant thing she's ever done well compared to her music perhaps yes uh pretty much everything looks brilliant compared to her music so perhaps yes. Pretty much everything looks brilliant compared to her music, so-called music. She appeared wearing a wedding dress on October the 20th in a video she put on Instagram

to talk about how she'd married herself. The pair of posts came in the wake of her divorce from her ex-husband after only a year of marriage. Again, so like I said, how long will this marriage do itself last? It was a blessing to be able to share my life with someone for such a long time, she said, after that one-year marriage. And, you know, people grow apart and people move on after a year. She's 30 years old so the where are we now with all this stuff well we have it is a dark time and we should take the darkness seriously this is an ex psychic who

is warning about her life in all of this darkness. She says, I am a former psychic, and I am noticing that tools of divination, such as a Ouija board, tarot cards, are being marketed more in the Halloween season. Parties are having tarot card readers. You're seeing this in home goods, CVS. Your kids are going to these stores like five below. They're glorifying tools of divination. They're making them seem like they're fun, like it's no big deal.

She said, it's interesting to see that this goes along with the Halloween season, isn't it? She said, there's something demonic in there. She said, when I was 12, I actually had two psychic attacks. And she defines a psychic attack as receiving information psychically. She said around that time, she had her first tarot card reading. She said it seemed to be innocuous, though now she believes that it was a satanic practice. She said what seemed to be innocuous ended up to being addictive.

She said it was a horrible rabbit hole of destruction. I always say there's a gateway or an entryway into the demonic, whether it is tarot cards or Ouija boards or horoscopes or what have you. She found herself increasingly doing readings and exploring tools like divination, numerology, astrology, other practices like that. She said one of the facets of her experience that initially convinced her to continue for years in the occult was that the demons she was summoning would appear as clients, deceased loved ones. I could see the demon because that's what it is.

She said it was masquerading as a mom. I actually heard a Christian teacher once say, he was a pastor of a big church, and he said, I had somebody ask me, he said, what would you say if I told you that my deceased mom appeared at the end of the bed and talked to me? He goes, I'd believe you. I just wouldn't believe it was your mom. My biggest warning, she said, would be when you do devilish things, you get devilish outcomes, and you will get devilish

results satan masquerades as an ancient angel of light so what you think is fun what you think is innocent is actually a tool of the devil a game of the devil and it's not a game to mess with which then brings us to halloween and it's now becoming a very big thing in Ireland where it really goes back to a pagan festival. I always pronounce this as Samhain. They say it is pronounced as Soen. And maybe that is the correct pronunciation with it. But it's such a big deal that irish catholics have started an organization to oppose this growing pagan festival and um they said it's a public campaign organized by the irish

society for christian civilization seeking to inform people about the true nature of the annual puka festival and again i have no idea if that's the way you pronounce that or not. It's got some kind of accent on the U, so I don't know how you pronounce that. The festival has grown to significant prominence in Ireland in recent years. They have it from October the 31st to November the 3rd. And the official website describes the festival as marking, quote quote the mystical traditions of so so in yet brimming with contemporary energy it invites visitors to dance with otherworldly

creatures to experience halloween in its most authentic form the multi-day program posits two evening two events as particular highlights the gathering of the spirits and the lighting of the Samhain fire, the street performance, music and a wild celebration of lore, the looming darkness, they said. As light turns to darkness and the veil thins, so too will the visions of otherworldly, shapeshifting spirits on their journey through the original home of Halloween in Ireland. The lighting of the fire, the organizers write, is a way to connect festival attendees to the ancient pagan rituals.

They said the ritual serves to bridge the gap between the physical and spiritual world. And, of course, maybe they can drop some hallucinogenics as well, because that's now being normalized, being normalized by therapy. It's also, we've got mainstream articles talking about, uh, there was one that was put up on the drudge report. Um, this is a housewife who is, um, uh, doing, uh, mushrooms, you know, like once a week or something like that. And, um, you you know kind of made me think of um um the white rabbit was that the name of it from jefferson airplane you know the pills that mother gives you don't do anything at all well this mom's got some pills up so the pagan festival was held to mark the turn of the season from summer to winter they believed it to involve the passing

of spirits between the world it centered around evil spirits particularly one known as puka and the time was marked by the brief and temporary ascendancy of the powers of darkness i wonder if that is the right way to pronounce that remember at uh um a film um jimmy stewart harvey they said harvey was a puka yeah never never i thought what the world are they talking about but maybe that's what that is Jimmy Stewart, Harvey. They said Harvey was a puka. Yeah, never, never. I thought, what in the world are they talking about? But maybe that's what that is. The first commandment is, I am the Lord your God. You shall have no strange gods before me.

That is broken. That is replaced by false gods like this puka, this divination. And at the same time, we've got George Barna, who looks at surveys, people's attitudes, what they tell them about what they believe, their worldview, what their life is like. He says, you know, we've rejected God. And he said, I think it is fueling the crisis that underlines our country. Is part of America's massive mental health malaise actually rooted in a spiritual crisis, they ask? He said, we're in a situation where the best estimates are that we have about one out of every four adults

with some kind of diagnosable mental illness. There's a wide range. But when we look at it more deeply, we find that those numbers are higher the younger a person is. So as you try to dig into it, to try to figure out things like anxiety, depression, fears, suicidal thoughts ocd tendencies yeah when um they locked everybody down said stay away don't touch anything remember 2020

i said it's the ocd nation really was addictions so when we look at all those things what we find is that often what may be happening is that it's not that they have some kind of chemical imbalance or some kind of a physical issue that's causing what appears to be mental illness. What's causing it may be their belief structure, their worldview. And so he says the majority of people in Gen Z, that is 56% of Gen Z, which are individuals in their teens and early 20s, 56% of them struggle with mental health issues. He said only 1% of them have a biblical worldview. Then millennials, 49% of them, these are people in their mid-20s to late-30s and early-40s, they say they consistently wrestle with anxiety, depression, fear, etc., and only 2% of that generation has a biblical worldview.

He said, but older generations like Gen X and Baby Boomers who have a higher proportion of members embracing a biblical worldview have a lesser percentage of people struggling with this mental illness. He says, uh, people have a biblical worldview are less likely to end up in prison, less likely to have abortions, less likely to engage in other risky behaviors like addiction.

He said, they're much more likely to have longer lasting marriages, not to marry themselves. Even if they don't have a one year, not to marry themselves even. They don't have a one-year marriage and then marry themselves. They rate their marriages higher in terms of fulfillment and joy. And they're much more likely to have a clear, compelling sense of the meaning of life. So, you know, when we look at what is behind all this, this is'll finish up here this section before we go to break

um this was from dissenter.com and i don't know who the writer was i didn't identify it but it's a excellent article talking about contrast is the language of god's glory and what we see here is a real contrast you know we see people who are increasingly embracing the darkness and openly and publicly doing it at this time of year, in Halloween. And I think that there's a great deal in terms of, contrast is so important. Without it, we can't really see what is happening.

And that's one of the reasons why when I cover the news and I do events that I think are items that I think are important, and when I try to get my perspective on it, try to analyze it, it's always about comparing and contrasting. Because if you don't have contrast, you can't really see what's going on. And he begins with the example of photographs he said if you got a photograph it's got really poor contrast that you can't yeah it's it's not interesting you can't really see what is happening there there's no detail it's not very intense there's no depth there's no definition because but you crank up the contrast on it and in the

world of photography, for example, a dull image that doesn't have any contrast, doesn't have any life, it's indistinguishable, it's lost among other images, it holds no defined shape or purpose. But if you add contrast, if you intensify the shadows, if you brighten the highlights, suddenly it pops off the page.

Every line, every curve, every intricate detail pops up with new life, and there's clarity and depth that draws the viewer in and captivates and refuses to let go. So he says, in the hands of the eternal king and holy one, contrast is the force that magnifies his glory against the background of a world veiled in darkness. Of course, God's glory is never, it is never dull. It is absolute in its brilliance, but it's against the backdrop of our own shadows,

our sin, our darkness, our self-imposed blindness. That's where we see his glory standing out, made even more brilliant by the contrast. He says, God, in his infinite wisdom, used our wickedness for his glory, for his radiance, his justice, his unyielding holiness. None of it would be fully perceived if not for the contrast provided by a world bound to sin. Like light splitting through dark clouds, the brilliance of God's nature shines even brighter when placed next to humanity's flawed and fallen nature. God's love, what a profound, incomparable thing,

consummately revealed in John 3.16. And Doug O'Lough didn't know I was going to talk about this. He put a tip and he said, well, today's verse is John 3.16. For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. And that's where this author goes as well. He says, we know that verse. We see it on, you know, put everywhere, John 3.16. He says, just a few verses later, what we see there is, and this is the judgment. The light has come into the world and people love the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. He says, what a revelation. God's love and our rejection of that love are set

against each other in brutal, unavoidable contrast. We want the darkness because it hides our shame, and we avoid the light because it exposes what we truly are. Yet God's glory isn't tainted by this. God's glory is intensified by this. The pure holiness of God is brought into clear view not by being diminished, but by revealing the depths of man's depravity. Against such darkness, the beauty of his light is undeniable and inescapable. We live in a world where we see through a glass darkly. The full radiance of God's glory is yet to be revealed to us in this fallen world, but we watch and we catch glimpses, moments of piercing clarity. But here's the wonder.

God doesn't use contrast to shame us, to leave us helpless in our sin. Instead, he uses it to eliminate a path toward redemption. His glory, his holiness, his justice, all of these attributes come to us as light piercing through the darkness, calling us out, not to condemn, but to save. How would we know the brilliance of forgiveness if we hadn't tasted the bitterness of guilt? How would we know the depth of grace if we hadn't first fallen? In God's economy, contrast isn't just a reminder of what we lack.

It's an invitation to step in the glorious salvation that he offers. Some may say, well, that's harsh. Why couldn't God have created a world without the possibility of darkness? Why allow sin at all? Yet, in his wisdom, he has used the very contrast of light and dark, sin and holiness, to reveal his love in a way that defies comprehension. We cannot understand the brilliance of God's light if we pretend that the darkness doesn't exist. But when we acknowledge both, when we see the contrast,

then we begin to grasp the magnificence of who he is. So think about that. This time of year when the darkness is on display. When the darkness is being worshipped. He says, we may still walk around this world of shadows, but in those moments when his light breaks through, we understand, even if just for a moment, his glory is brighter brighter his love is deeper

his truth more real I didn't say this in here but it reminds me of the very beginning of Genesis what does it say? let there be light and he separated light from darkness we'll be right back Thank you. Terima kasih telah menonton! you're listening to The David Knight Show. Howdy, ModernRetroRadio.com.

Thank you very much. That is very kind of you. I appreciate that. He says, I have to say once again that it is stunning that MAGA voters are positively oblivious to Trump's blazingly unconstitutional record as president. And I agree. I never thought I would see in my lifetime what was done in 2020. The lockdowns and all the rest of this stuff. I never thought that people would put up with that.

And by the time we got to the summer, by the time we got to July, I thought, no, we're never getting out of this. If people are this dumb to go along with this, even one day of it, you want to talk about a masquerade, you don't talk about a silly thing like Halloween. You want to talk about darkness. And after four months of it, I don't think we're ever going to get out of this.

And now they want it again. And you know, as I thought about it, I thought, and you know, of course it would come from a Republican who is actually a New York Democrat, New York City Democrat. It would come from somebody who was a lifelong friend,

best friend of Jeffrey Epstein and the Clintons, who would pose as, you know, the people who hate everything that they stand for would embrace him as their savior. It's just the most delusional thing I've ever seen in my life. You want to talk about contrast? You want to talk about light and darkness?

12 June, 1776. Thank you very much. I really do appreciate that. It says, for all those feeling the pinch at present that support the DK family day in and day out, this is from them all. Thank you so much. I really do appreciate that. It says for all those feeling the pinch at present, uh, that support the DK family day in and day out, this is from them all. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Thank you all my friends. I really do appreciate that. Well, let's talk a little bit about the, uh, vaccines as they're now, uh, lining things up to try to do this to us again. You know, well, everybody knows you're going to play this game again. How do we know

they're going to play this game again? Because we know they're going to play this game again because we've not stopped anybody from either it's both parties that did this it's a uniparty approach so it doesn't matter whether it's la la or don we know they're going to play this game again the only question is you know what lies are they going to tell us is it going to be bird flu is it going to be bird flu? Is it going to be something else? Well, here they are talking about bird flu and a pig. Yes, when pigs fly or when pigs flu. ...sounding over bird flu after a pig tested positive for it for the first time ever in this country. The Ag Department says this pig is from a backyard

farm in the Pacific Northwest. It's from a commercial farm, but it's a farm that's still under quarantine. They say there's not a risk right now to the pork supply and that the risk to humans is low. But keep in mind, the pigs are kind of a special kind of virus petri dish. They can be infected with bird and human viruses at the same time, which makes it kind of dangerous. The news comes as this bird flu, the H5N1 virus, keeps spreading fast among dairy cows across the country. Berkeley Loveless is joining us now. Okay, how did they find it and what does it mean? Yeah, so it is concerning. So they did find it in a farm in Crook County, Oregon. And so this farm had positive cases of poultry on the farm. So out of abundance of caution, they decided to test this pig and five other pigs

on the farm for H5N1 bird flu. So this one pig did test positive for it. They're currently testing two others. One out of five. So that's a good sign as well. But overall, as you mentioned, this is concerning because pigs are essentially mixing bulls for flu viruses. They can

become infected with bird and human viruses at the same time, which can allow them to mutate. He's laughing. He knows this isn't serious. It's transmissible to humans, so the concern right now is a virus that can spread to humans. And so there's been a lot of attention on bird flu right now. So far, there's been 36 human cases

of bird flu in the U.S., which has been a concern. We've got cases here. Farm workers who work directly with... Who didn't have the flu, even. There was a case in Missouri that raised some alarm bells. This person did not have any contacts with any animals. Just a PCR test.

The only contact he had. ...determined that there was no signs of human-to-human transmission. So what's the CDC doing about it at this point? Are they monitoring, keeping an eye on it? They're continuing to test animals. They're testing more of the pigs. about it at this point? I mean, are they kind of monitoring, keeping an eye on it? So they're continuing to test animals. So they're testing more of the pigs. Listen to how this ends. Under quarantine as well.

I think a big question right now is whether or not the pig truly tested positive for bird flu. So they're going to do additional testing. So is this pig really was infected with bird flu, either through sharing feed with the poultry animals or water, or did the pig somehow pick up fragments of the virus um and so that fragment came up on the testing as well um so those are all tests those are all you know remaining questions right now uh for that but there's there's you know it's a little bit concerning yeah uh berkeley love us anyway keep an eye on it and keep us honest on that one appreciate it thanks keep us honest is that a

freudian slip? And at the very end of this, it's like, well, you know, they're not really sure how this pig got it. Did he really have it? Did he have fragments of it? So you know what they're doing is they're doing a PCR test.

What are they even testing for? They haven't isolated this virus. They don't ever isolate viruses. Remember? We talked about that. I forget the person who was doing the research. She sent, you know, over 250 different institutions globally, said, do you have the COVID virus isolated? And, you know, they said no, or a lot of them said, we don't ever do that.

What are you talking about? We don't ever do that. We come up with a genetic model that we think approximates that, you know, in the same way that when they would do the annual flu shot well we don't know what flu strain is going to be around this year they would say so we're just going to pick one and we'll vaccinate everybody for that one oh well that should do it right and so you know when you start talking about human cases what absolute nonsense again all of these people that saw, now they're saying it's up to 36, but you know, when it was about a half dozen, it wasn't anybody that had any respiratory symptoms. They didn't have any fever. What'd they have? They had conjunctivitis, one of the most common things that you have, especially if you're working in a dirty environment around animal feces and

things like that. If you don't clean your hands, you rub your eyes, you're going to get conjunctivitis. That's all they had, pink eye. They were calling pink eye bird flu and using the PCR test. And the other thing was, well, this is a backyard farm. Was it a backyard farm? I mean, they had chickens, they had pigs and things like that. Maybe it was a house. Maybe it was, they later on called it a farm. Maybe it's just a backyard farm? I mean, they had chickens, they had pigs and things like that. Maybe it was a house. Maybe it was, they later on called it a farm.

Maybe it's just a small farm. And when they say it's not a, you know, a real farm, maybe they mean it's not commercial agricultural endeavor with millions of pigs or something. And why would you let them test your livestock? I don't understand why anybody would allow that. So again, it's a PCR test. What are they even looking for? Do they know?

The other pigs were not sick. It was not being transmitted to them. But you better be worried because, you know, they might somehow get transmitted to you. Even though these pigs that are known to not be the cleanest animals and living in close proximity to each other Could not pass it on to each other. This is something, you know, the pigs are a petri dish. A pig tree dish, I guess. What? Well, let's try to keep it honest.

And I'm going to try to keep them honest. They don't like me for that. We're going to try to keep them real honest here. The godfather of vaccines. Yeah, you know, we got Trump, who is the, he's made it very clear that he's the father of the vaccine. But there is a godfather of the vaccine, Stanley Plotkin. Going back to the early 1960s, this guy is pretty elderly now.

He was doing pediatric residency as a young man in London at the Hospital for Sick Children. He admitted in a 2018 court case that orphans, mentally handicapped, and babies of mothers who were in prison were being experimented on for the development of vaccines. He's an American physician who in his retirement has now worked as a consultant to the big four vaccine manufacturers, as well as to biotech firms, nonprofits, governments. His book, Vaccines, is the standard reference on the subject, according to Wikipedia. He has been nicknamed as the godfather of the vaccines. When he's asked about that, he said, well, I think it's ambiguous. Since the godfather was a criminal i wouldn't call myself that but obviously i can't stop other people from calling me that

there are quite a few people who do call them that i call him a criminal uh during the covid pandemic he was sought for advice on recommendations for the use of mrna and other vaccines but of course you know the father father of the COVID vaccine is none other than Donald Trump. I don't know why the people who follow him would not give him that. And, you know, you got to be careful. He's going to get really angry with you and do something to stab you in the back.

If you don't, uh, kiss his ring and other parts of his anatomy, uh, you better, you better give him what he wants, or you're going to be disloyal. And you know what Trump does be disloyal and you know what trump does to disloyal people uh in an article on tuesday roman bistrionic said the medical establishment sees you as part of an unending experiment boy is this not true listen to this this guy nails it the medical establishment sees you as part of an unending experiment, a subject for trial, and an array of medications and vaccines without ever being fully informed about the potential dangers.

You likely trust these products are meticulously tested. You believe that corporations and governments would never risk your well-being. But history tells a different story. And our personal history does as well, doesn't it? The national vaccination of DTP, diphtheria tetanus pertussis, began in the U.S. in the late 1940s in England by 1957. Very early on, there were indications of problems. A 1946 article discussed twin boys aged 10 months who both died on June 19, 1945,

after receiving their second injection of DTP. A 1948 article in Pediatrics discussed cases of brain damage following use of the vaccine. A 1980 report tied the use of the DP DTP vaccine to seizures. But Hey, uh, you know, it's rare. It was rare. We don't care about that. Right. I mean, how many people are going to sacrifice?

We don't really care. We did have a, during the, some previous vaccine campaigns. When a couple of people died, he had nine States outlawed. We don't care about that anymore. Distrionic quoted Stanley Plotkin's testimony in 2018 in Michigan court, where he admitted to DTP vaccines being used in developing countries such as Latin America and Africa,

despite there being a 10 times greater death rate among those who got the vaccine. He admitted that children of mothers in prison, the mentally challenged, populations in developing countries were experimented on by vaccine researchers and developers. Reading from the transcript of the court case where he was under oath, they asked him, have you ever used orphans to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine?

And he says, well, I don't recall specifically having done that. But in the late 1960s, it was not unusual to do that. And I wouldn't deny that I may have done so. Well, have you ever expressed that it's better to perform experiments on those less likely to be able to contribute to society, such as children with a handicap, than with children without or adults without handicaps? Well, I don't remember specifically, but it's possible I said that. He says, well, I'm going to hand you what has been marked as Exhibit 43. Do you recognize this letter that you wrote to the editor?

He says, yes. Did you write this letter? Yes. As a matter of fact, this letter was Exhibit 43. It was something that he wrote to the New England Journal of Medicine, a 1973 article that he wrote called The Ethics of Human Experimentation. And so he asks him, he says, here's something that you wrote called the ethics of human experimentation and so he asked him he says here's something that you wrote in that the question is whether we have are to have experiments performed

on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are in human, who are human in form, but not in social potential. You hear that? They are human in form, but not in social potential. And so, you know, we can do experiments on them. We can abort babies. We can do humanized mice. We can whatever, you know, that they're in human form and they're going to eventually

become humans if we let them go, but they're not humans now. There's something else, I guess. And so we can do whatever we want to to them. And he said, yes, I did write that. And I said, well, it may be objected that this question implies a Nazi philosophy, but I don't think that it's difficult to distinguish non-functioning persons from members of ethnic racial economic or other groups he says have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine yes did you do so in the belgian congo uh he says yes did that experiment involve almost a million people it wasn't prison people but he's

asking him to go to uh countries that were under colonial rule right uh did that experiment involve almost a million people well well all right yes yes you see it never ends and so you know when he says well these are people that aren't really going to yeah because how do you know that right young children you don't know they're going to contribute anything so you uh give beethoven the shot because his mom's uh you know he's poor and um you know he's diseased and all the rest of stuff um you you can identify all that stuff. Um, but, uh, when you hear all of that, doesn't that kind of harken back to what Trump was saying in terms of, uh, essential businesses and essential people and things like that? Uh, was that maybe what he

was being told by the people that he followed? And, uh, you know, we, he pretended at the beginning of his, when he's running as a campaign, um, and at the beginning he pretended that he was something of a skeptic about vaccines, but then in 2019, I played this over and over again. Right? Well, it turns out that if we take a look at, uh, um, some of the people that he's also referenced, he didn't go to the 1918 flu when Joe Rogan pressed him on it because if he would have pressed him on what he did with the COVID shot,

$11 billion to the pharmaceutical companies to develop it, push it around, tell everybody it's the best thing that's ever been invented, how he saved millions of lives. He would have fallen back on this 1918 flu nonsense. But instead, you know, they mentioned vaccines, and he pivots over to polio. Oh, vaccines are good. Look, saved everybody from polio.

Well, that's not really true. But, you know, let's not talk about covet stuff and again um when joe rogan was questioned about it he said he had determined ahead of time that i was not going to talk about the covet vaccines and so um but he couldn't help but when trump said something about polio and gaza he goes well that's from the oral vaccine isn't it that you're giving people now here's a clip of the guy saban who created the oral polio vaccine listen to what he has to say to get rid of these viruses why would he call it an obfuscation if it was a virus that was contaminatedating the vaccine? Well, there were 40 different viruses in these vaccines anyway

that we were inactivating. But you weren't inactivating the Kislo. That's correct. No, that's right. But yellow fever vaccine had leukemia virus in it and, you know, this is in the days of very crude science. So anyway, I went down and talked to him

and I said, well, why are you concerned about it? I said, well, I'll tell you what. I said, I have a feeling in my bones that this virus is different. I don't know why to tell you this, but I've been around biology a long time. I just think this virus may have some long-term effects.

And he said, what? I said, cancer. I love it. I love it. I love it. Go ahead. Yeah. No. I said, Albert, I said, you probably think I'm nuts, but I just had that feeling.

Well, in the meantime, we had taken this virus and put it into monkeys and into hamsters. Uh-huh. into hamsters. So we had this meeting and that was sort of the topic of the day and the jokes that were going around was, gee, we would win the Olympics because the Russians would only load them down with tumors. This is where the vaccine was being tested. This was this year, Anderson. So it really destroyed the meeting. You know, it was a rendition. Right. So, and it really destroyed the meeting. You know, it was a big event. Yeah, right. So it was sort of a topic,

you know, anyway. Was this the Cancer Society meeting in New York? No, no, this was the Sister Kennedy.

Oh, it was Sister Kennedy. Right. And Dale Bechel got up and said that he foresaw problems with these kinds of agents. Why didn't this get out in the press? Well, I guess it did.

We had no press release on it, obviously. You don't go on. This is a scientific affair within the scientific community. This is a scientific affair, that's what these guys do. The guy who was questioning him, by the way, was the chair of medical history at the University of Toronto. The laughter was not added. That was there in the original thing.

It's a pretty raw video, but that's all there. So like Goy says, the lockdowns masks and especially the social monitoring americans did to each other gave me an entirely new perspective on my countrymen on their cowardice and their obedience yeah it was not a pretty sight and now we see these same people who were cowardly and obedient and compliant lining up to vote for one of these two people that was pushing all this stuff on us that's a whole new level of compliance in my book guillain-barre syndrome associated with 17 vaccines including covid and flu shots a new long-term study accessing the association of vaccines with reported cases of again, beret syndrome.

This is coming from children's health. And you know, a lot of people are hoping that things will change because, um, RFK is there with a Trump and I think he's using him as a beard, just like he used them to get, um, contributions from big pharmaceutical companies. I don't even trust RFK Jr. Frankly. And I certainly don't't even trust RFK Jr. Frankly. And I certainly don't trust Trump using RFK Jr. Don't people remember how quickly he throws people out in the street for

whatever reason? Uh, and he doesn't, uh, when he gets somebody that's good in a position like he had Scott Pruitt at the EPA, that was the bright spot of the Trump administration was Scott Pruitt, who had been, uh a attorney general in Oklahoma, and he had fought and challenged the EPA and it was a big win to get him in as head of the EPA and he resisted a

lot of stuff, but Trump resisted him on things like the Paris climate accord and other things like that. And then, uh, the Democrats manufactured these Democrats manufactured these scandals, silly scandals. Oh, you know, you're renting this apartment at below market value or something. Ridiculous stuff. And Trump just abandoned him. So he left. Look, there's a number of ways that he'd get rid of RFK Jr.

Or RFK Jr. could leave or RFK Jr could betray us. I don't put any, uh, hope in any of this. We better not think that we're going to get these solving problems solved in Washington. They are our problems and we need to solve our problems and not hope that they're passively hope that they're going to be solved by somebody else one of the ways that you stop this is just to stop complying you know when people stopped with all the masks and all the other nonsense it just kind of gradually disappeared it wasn't that any of these leaders uh you know they were following us if you go back and remember this right it wasn't like one day they came up and they said all right right, we've got some, we've thought about this a little bit more. We've done some actual science and we're not going to do these superstitious measures anymore.

No, they tried to put a happy face, a brave face on it when people just stopped complying. We have the power. There's more of us than there are of them. We never had to do any of that stuff. And so we need to, again, recapture that understanding and not put so much concern on what's going on with this election. I understand that you can make a lot of money doing that. And I know a lot of people who do that. That's their business model. It's the business model of people on both the left and the right. Shame on them.

The study published October the 19th in the journal Scientific Reports, part of the Springer Nature family of journals, examined global cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome between 1967 and 2023. And the authors found that of the 19 vaccines examined 17 vaccines, including COVID-19 and the flu vaccines were potentially associated with Guillain-Barre syndrome. If we go all the way back to the 1970s, that swine flu thing that was exposed by 60 minutes and Mike Wallace and the key lady that was talking about it she had been um you know injured she had Guillain-Barre syndrome uh she couldn't walk for

the longest time she was paralyzed and then she was at the time he interviewed her she had braces on so that she could walk and um I we had a friend uh church who had a flu shot and then wound up in the hospital with Guillain-Barre syndrome. Couldn't connect it. He didn't connect it. I mean, you got Franklin Graham pushing the vaccine. He winds up in the hospital with pericarditis. It doesn't connect it.

Yeah. So, um, one to two Guillain-Barre syndrome cases per 100,000 people. That's rare. Don't worry about it. Forget about it, right? Because these people are not essential. So you got a million people. You got 100 million people, right?

Well, you're going to have a few hundred people who are not essential, and they're just going to be taken out of society. We don't really care about that. It can be deadly. According to the Cleveland Clinic, less than 2% of people die from it in the acute phase of the disease when symptoms are at their peak. But according to the study,

the mortality rate can reach 17% in countries that have limited resources. According to the Lancet in 2021, AP Rumble Seat says those WW2 camp experiments just went underground. That's right. Brought these guys over here. Brought them over, Operation Paperclip. They became the basis of our biological

and chemical research programs. They're at Fort Beatrick, i think it was uh in maryland um and um they would bring in these guys uh from germany and they would put american up at the top and but they would be like the number two number three person just like when and the trump administration put gina haspel in his number two under pomo, but she's really running the thing. And then eventually they put her in charge. Um, they went underground. They were hidden behind bureaucratic constructs. Like I just talked about. Yeah. Uh, like a vaccine delivery to create disease.

They've been experimenting on the public for decades. That's absolutely right. One J to view says, David, did you see they're pushing the regular flu again lately? Notice that in the news your shots oh i see the signs everywhere grocery stores drugstores um talked about it uh last week you go in and get your get your shots and they'll give you like 20 you know off of uh groceries or something and uh it's really come down from the potential to win a million dollars. Uh, but, uh, yeah, you gotta ask yourself, uh, where are they getting, uh, who, who is incentivizing all this stuff that they're handing out all this money. We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back. Thank you. The End you're listening to the david knight show well welcome back um we're still trying to get tony

on the line um and he should be joining us shortly uh but it gives us a little bit of time to talk about this nudge thing that i didn't get to. The NIH is spending millions, 2.2 million, to nudge now elderly people to get more vaccines. And as I've talked about this, even going back to the Yale study that was released in July of 2020, they target people, demographic groups, by age, by race, ethnic group, whether they're Christians or non-Christians or all these different things. They have different tricks to trick us into this.

They call it nudging. So this is targeting people with propaganda based on their demographics and how they look. And I've said for the longest time that this is a psyop. I said the only science in all of this pandemic superstition of the mask and the social distancing and the six feet apart, I said the only science in any of this is behavioral psychology, behavioral science. And so they're testing this. They're going to test it for five years.

Maybe they should test the jab, you think. No, they don't care about it. They know what's in the jab, and they know the results that they're getting, and what they're going to test and fine-tune is the propaganda. And so the $2.2 million is for a clinical trial they call Be Immune, which began in 2020. Yeah, we noticed. And will run through 2025.

Spend five years figuring out how they can trick and deceive people. Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Washington are using electronic health records data to target African-American, Hispanic, Asian people who have lower flu and pneumonia and herpes vaccine rates. The trial is testing strategies drawn from the behavioral economics, which uses insights from psychology to understand, in this case, to nudge or to direct people's decision-making behavior. This is simply propaganda.

They call it nudging. And as Cass Sunstein did this with the Obama administration wrote a book on it at that point in time. Um, so, uh, the, uh, experts who are combining, they said medical and business-based strategies to run studies like this. Yeah. Go back to Edward Bernays, Madison Avenue. These are the people who were using psychological programming

to manipulate us into wars. Then, you know, that's what he did for Woodrow Wilson. And then he goes to Madison Avenue to get us to buy their products. And now they're still doing the same thing. And these people are so good at pressuring you that they can get you to inject poison. The Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, they have in-house what they call a nudge unit.

They've worked really hard on the science of this, where behavioral design teams are dedicated to figuring out how to influence patient choices. Do you see how they target this, how they practice this? I mean, it is a fine art to these people, the fine art of deception. The grant is part of a massive initiative by the NIH to increase vaccine uptake by changing how people make decisions. Hundreds of millions of dollars in grants since 2020 to create, quote, culturally tailored pro-vaccine propaganda to promote COVID-19 and flu shots.

And of course, Trump is funding it very heavily. It also included more than 50 grants worth $40 million designed to increase HPV vaccine uptake. The range of tested interventions is scaled on a ladder. Nudges lower on the ladder try presenting people with information so they can make their own decisions about vaccines. And as you move up the ladder, it's this pyramid, as you move up, they become more and more coercive.

Nudges that are higher on the ladder either prompt people to make decisions or simply plan their decisions for them at the very top. We have scheduled you for this and you must go, that type of thing. One nudge automatically sets up a vaccine appointment for people compelling them to go to their appointment and to get vaccinated unless they intentionally opt out. There's so many different ways that they can gaslight people. You have to say, well, what leverage do they have over people? Well, you know, if you are in the VA or something like that, they might make this, as we have

seen, they might make these vaccines, your healthcare and other areas contingent on your vaccine uptake. That's at the very top of the pyramid. At the very bottom, they say, do nothing. Simply monitor the vaccination rates. And the next one, they provide information. Offer education on benefits of vaccination. The next one, frame the information.

Deliver social comparison feedback on vaccination rate among peers and healthier individuals, and on and on and on. And then you make it more and more, we're going to help you to do this. Finally, you get to the point where they say, I've scheduled you for it. You've got to go get it. The opt-out framework has been effective in other areas of health care. For example, in colorectal cancer screening or persuading more people to take their flu shots.

I had these people try to do that to us. You know, oh, well, you've got to have this test. Because of your age, you well you gotta have this test you know because your age you're gonna have this test or it's like um sorry if it ain't broke don't probe it um because you're not gonna fix anything uh you start probing around you're probably gonna break something so stay away from me i if something's hurting i'll let you know and I'll get your opinion about it. And then I'll, uh, find my own treatment. Uh, I just gotta say, you know, doctors killed both of my parents. Doctors have injured both of my sons.

Uh, I despise these people. They're absolutely evil. Penn's nudge unit, which builds itself as the world's first behavioral design team embedded within a health system. Again, Cass Sunstein's 2008 book Nudge. I remember talking about that. I said, look at this.

They're putting the plan out about how they're going to manipulate and propagandize people. Penn Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania launched their Nudge unit in 2016 uh inspired by david cameron's nudge unit in the uk which was put in in 2010 and so this is um this is a established practice it is um greedy, deceptive monsters who make money by harming people. Even the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi, says, well, this theory has its critics.

Detractors argue that nudges can be paternalistic, they can be invasive, they can be ideological and coercive in ways that erode public trust do not trust them absolutely do not trust them well um yeah don't trust this guy either with his uh lemonade stand we're gonna take a quick break and we've now got tony on the line and um we'll be right back folks stay with us we're trying to it I'm sorry. Analyzing the Globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. All right, we're back. I don't know if we've got Tony or not. Not really sure what's happening here.

We're going to have some problems with the board. So we're going to continue on. We've got Tony on the line. We're trying to get this set up, but we've got some technical issues here. Not really sure what's happening. So let's talk a little bit about climate as i said before we have um uh now somebody's done some science and they said uh well you know the science that was settled well actually isn't we found according to our experiments that plants absorb 31 percent more co2 than we ever thought

as i said the beginning of the program perhaps this is why every one of their computer models has been wrong for 60 years. Maybe if they start with that fundamental misconception, they can't get anything to work. A new study reveals that plants have been absorbing 31% more CO2 than previously believed. A glaring error that casts serious doubt on climate models, emissions scenarios, and policy prescriptions like net zero. None of this stuff makes any sense, folks. We know that it's all been science fiction. For years, we were told that the science was settled, that the urgent action was needed to avoid catastrophic warning.

But this discovery suggests that our models have been dramatically underestimating nature's ability to manage CO2. This revelation not only upends the rationale behind aggressive policies, but it also raises broader questions about the supposed certainty of climate science. And they begin by talking about the myth of settled science. But I always said science is never settled. The only time we've had advances in science is when you've had somebody who's questioned the status quo, the conventional wisdom. Every time science advances is because one person stood up against the collective wisdom

of history and the academy and said, yeah, but actually I did this and I didn't get the results that you're talking about. Well, we looked at this and I didn't get the results that you're talking about. Well, we looked at this, and we can't really isolate any viruses. And we haven't really been able to see any evidence of contagion, even though we put people. We did a 45-year experiment on trying to transmit colds to people. We haven't been able to do that. So at some point, you've got to be able to question the science and if you've got people as we do now who will their response to all this is just to censor you and shut you down we're not talking about science we're talking about authority and we're talking about authoritarian

society here's the abstract by the way uh this was something that was sent and published on nature and the abstract says, terrestrial photosynthesis, or gross primary production, GPP, is the largest carbon flux in the biosphere, but its global magnitude and spatiotemporal dynamics remain uncertain. The global annual mean of GPP

is historically thought to be around, and they give the units of measurement, but it's about 31% lower, they said. The disparity is a source of uncertainty in predicting climate, carbon cycle feedbacks. Here we infer what this is from carbonyl sulfide, an innovative tracer for CO2 diffusion from ambient air to leaf chloroplasts through stomata and mesophyll layers. We demonstrate that explicitly representing mesophyll diffusion is important for accuracy, quantifying the spatiotemporal dynamics of the sulfide taken up by the plant. So we're getting into the weeds here literally but the bottom line is that's just the technical jargon of this study the bottom line

is that the plants are absorbing a great deal more co2 and uh so okay we do have uh have it fixed we've got tony okay so we're going to take a quick break and we're gonna get Tony on right away And I'll give you the rest of this and the consequences of this when we come back We'll be right back Using free speech to free minds it's the david knight show well it takes so long to get you on tony it's great to have you on always interesting to talk to and right now everything is really changing besides the election and the effects on that and somebody sent me this article st louis fed releases an article on why a gold standard won't work they said it's because of gold's lack of a fixed supply is a significant

problem it's like what what are they talking about when you can have it yeah you just need to be able to manufacture as much of this stuff as you want and And so they say the supply of gold is not fixed. Well, it's a lot more fixed than the supply of their paper money, isn't it? It's amazing to see that argument. That's an interesting observation. The fact that gold is not fixed makes it their problem. And I think our founding fathers would disagree with that. I think history is going to judge them and disagree with that. I think history is going to judge them and disagree with that.

Did you see the press conference where Janet Yellen was asked about, is she worried about the dollar losing the world's reserve currency status? And when the question was asked, the monument for the Treasury Department fell off the podium. Did you see that? I didn't see that. I didn't see that. That's great. It was only a couple of days ago. Yeah, live. I mean, she asked about tariffs, and then she was asked about this. Do you have any anxiety about the dollar losing the world's reserve currency status? As soon as the question was asked, literally the treasury seal fell off the podium, and Janet Yellen just looked kind of dazed. I'll have to send it to you.

It's very apropos. Then Dagon falls over, and the head breaks off. And it's crazy. That's crazy. Yeah, something that's a sign for us, isn't it? Well, when we're looking at what is happening with this election, there's a lot of uncertainty about that. But, of course, I think everybody understands that nothing is really going to change afterwards. I mean, there's not nobody's talking about any fixes for inflation.

I'll be surprised if we've got a fix for the wars. But certainly nothing to stop inflation. As a matter of fact, both of them are looking to increase spending. And, you know, as they hand out tax breaks to various other people. So all the fundamentals are still going to be there, I think, after the election, right? Oh, absolutely. And, I mean, we're looking at an all-time high for gold.

It hit $2,790. And really what that is is that the currencies around the world are losing to gold. I mean, they're printing more. The governments, the central banks are printing more. They're actually valuing their own currencies. And against gold, which is a fixed asset, a commodity is a precious metal uh it's finite and they're losing against that this is something that's happening it's not just in the United

States but worldwide and we're going to continue to see uh gold prices rise and they're not really rising though I mean again it's currencies are falling against gold. And, you know, it's interesting. I was reading that since the invasion of Russia, by Russia into Ukraine and the sanctions that were placed, central banks have bought five times more gold. They increased their central gold bank purchases by five times. And every time that 100 tons of gold gets bought by the central banks, the price of gold goes up between 1.5 and 2%. And this has been steady for the last two plus years. I think we're only going to continue to see these trends because, again, uncertainty, geopolitical tensions, and really the failures of governments to have any sort of fiscal sanity in the face of reality. And we're going to have,

I think a reset of prices globally. Yeah. Oh yeah, absolutely. And you know, when you look at what is happening with the bricks, uh, that is only accelerating and it's going to be that competition between these

two economic systems. I think that's going to continue to drive, uh, the accumulation of that. In addition to what you always talk about, the fact that the massive debt accumulation that we've got globally is not going to go away. So all of those things, you know, the trying to set up different standards, trying to get themselves to be trusted by more than the other system, that kind of competition. I think all that is going to drive, continue to drive gold accumulation by the central banks.

Yeah, that's this the trend that's going to continue nothing's really going to derail that and it regardless of what happens uh this coming tuesday with the election gold and i think bitcoin will continue to rise there may be you know i mean short-term differences uh in depending on which candidate makes it across the finish line or what's selected um but i i'm just looking at the bigger picture here and the trend is worldwide uh countries like the brics nations moving away from the dollar the dollar's in trouble we're going to see a continued loss of purchasing power with the us dollar people are going to move into gold and that's going to continue to what appears to be driving prices higher but really what it is is that, uh,

currencies are falling. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, you got, um, CBDC and all of the climate stuff of the bricks, um,

um, manifesto that they released. I mean, they're fully on board with everything from the UN and all the rest of them. So we got two competing systems, except it's like the two competing parties that we've got. Right. It stays,

we've got Democrats, Republicans. Oh, we got, you know, the brick system. We got the, you know, the, the, the we've got here in the United States. We've got Democrats and Republicans. We've got the BRICS system. We've got the Western system with SWIFT and all the rest of this. And yet both of them are embracing this full-on digital ID, the CBDC, and all the rest of this stuff at the same time. I just look at it, and the only thing that I see is that they're both going to be trying to shore up their credentials by buying gold and that we don't want to be a part of either one of these systems.

We want to try to be outside of it. And we should be trying to shore up our independence as well with gold, I think. You're absolutely right. And it's like talking about politics here in this country. If you start criticizing one party, they assume you're for the other one so if I start talking about what the bricks Nations are doing uh you know to uh get outside of the Western system the U.S system the dollar and de-dollarization they assume that I'm cheering for bricks which is which is ridiculous I'm not I'm I sympathize with a lot of uh you know their ideology and where they're headed and their strategy getting out of the Swift system and and and utilizing their own cross-border payments i think that's great i like decentralization

um but i think it's an opportunity for all of us to look at less being outside of the system being your own bank learning how to do that because that's the opportunity in the crisis that we're facing i mean it's never going to go back to the stability that we had uh relative after the Cold War there was you know maybe uh 15 20 years where it was it was decently smooth for the economy the dollar stayed pretty much the same and there was a slight inflation but it was manageable those days are done yeah I mean you just look at the the damage done we you were talking about it last week when we were you know. It's not just going a trillion dollars in debt every 100 days. It's closer to 2.5.

And how do you manage that? I mean, the interest on the debt, paying that is over a trillion dollars a year. It's just unsustainable. Debt to GDP ratios, they have to create a monetary reset. And they're doing that. And they're telling you they're going to do it. The last people to know will just be the regular folks and that are just walking around thinking that,

you know, they have normalcy bias. And we all do it to some degree. But I think that's really what we need to take from this. Not necessarily join a team and I'm for bricks or I can't wait for them to do whatever. You know, and there's speculation. You talk about gold being a fixed asset. That ideology has to die off. I mean, this is modern monetary theory, as you point out all the time, the magic money tree. This is like just establishment thought. It's pervasive and all of the economists that run academia and so much of the, you know politics and this this experiment that we've been in since 1971 it will come to an end and it's not that the dollar is going to go to zero i think or you'll have wheel

barrels full of cash to buy a loaf of bread or anything i'm not an alarmist but i think you'll just start to see that the fix is in people will start moving away from things that are too much counterparty risk or they see that they've got to get their cash out of the bank or out of savings and there's no yield on it, there's no return on these CDs anymore because of interest rates. And you'll see them buying assets, whether it's land or whether it's precious metals or something like Bitcoin. That will be the trend moving forward. And it's nothing I can do about it. I'm not even necessarily cheering it on unless people are learning. So if people are learning about what happened and they can make better decisions and I applaud that it shouldn't be out of fear,

but it should be from, from education. Oh, absolutely. Yeah. If we get into inflation or something like that, you know, again, if you can get some money into gold, I think the end game with this, the great taking all the rest of the stuff is to to say, well, we've got the debt. It needs to be paid. So we're going to confiscate your mortgages or anything like that. So to the extent that as the inflation kicks in, perhaps gold is going to be relatively worth more.

And that might help you to buy off some of these things to keep them from getting confiscated. That's one aspect of it. I just want to have the privacy, having some medium of exchange that is outside of their system. I've got a question here from Atomic Dog. It says, hey, Tony, is there an end in sight to this long run-up on gold and now silver? Seems like it runs up. Then there's some profit-taking. Then it runs up some more. It seems to be the cycle.

Well, I think that's a great question because you'll wonder where I got the, how the, well, we hit an all-time high again yesterday. And I assume that if history is my guide, I mean, first, you know, it was from 2011 to 2020, there was no all-time high. So let's just talk about that. And then from 2020, it took to 2022 to hit another one. Now, again, we're hitting it every other week and sometimes multiple times in the same week. So I think what you'll see is you'll continue to see this trend where gold will go up. There'll be some profit tanking. It'll pull back a little bit. Same thing with silver. But there's a level here, I think, when the paper gold and the ETFs separate from the physical gold,

when the demand continues to go up, which we're going to see from central banks. Like I said, it's gone up fivefold since 2022. That's central bank demand. That's only going to increase. So I think that watching it go up and then the profit taking, that's going to continue. I don't think we'll see any cratering. I don't think that it'll – know you're definitely not going to see two thousand dollar gold again unless there's an absolute Market crash but that'll only be

temporary I think there will be a more consolidation in the the gold price we're heading to and this is not just me saying this but I think I think it's a conservative estimate to be at three thousand,000 gold in 2025. Again, not financial advice, not about investments. I'm just telling you where it's going to be against the dollar and against other currencies. The real story besides gold, and I think even eclipsing gold, I've shared this with you, I think a couple of weeks ago, but it was a game changer. The Russian government putting silver and platinum and palladium on their strategic reserve asset list and really putting silver out front.

There's something to that. And this is a big move. Really, no government since the pre-communist Chinese were heavy on silver for strategic reserve assets. Russia moving into that, I think just underscores that silver truly is the most undervalued asset in the world, given all of its industrial uses and medical uses and then monetary uses. And the fact that it's under $34 an ounce is extremely cheap, given its history. I have to remind people, $52.50 in 1980, i know it was a bit of an anomaly but that had to do with the hunt family buying physical silver and nobody's done that since they were punished by the deep state i mean they were they were run through the mill for that and um you know i think targeted

financially because they exposed the weakness of the dollar so i know the trend to me is up there's always it doesn't always go up into the right, but the trend for both precious metals against the currencies worldwide, I think is going to continue to go up. And of course you're talking about the $50 silver gold was around 800 or something like that as well around that time. And about what would that be today? If we did that for inflation? Well, at least, you know four four five thousand yeah yeah so you know we look at this the the fundamentals and i think the reason that there is some profit taking but it continues to trend up is because the fundamentals are that uh they're not going

to do anything about the spending and they're not going to do anything about making you know printing more money and inflation all the rest rest of this stuff. And it doesn't matter, you know, which one of these two teams gets in, that's the way they're going to run it. I mean, when you look at what the Lala team is talking about, the green new deal, endless amounts of money being spent on this fantasy talking about reparations. And then on the Trump trump side he has absolutely no aversion to debt whatsoever and we saw that in 2020 uh yeah you know just you know do a bill three and a half trillion dollars and hey if you oppose that you say anything we're going to primary you out you know he said to massey at the time so he has no aversion to debt uh that is something that he has used all of his

life as leverage and he knows how to use it. He's very comfortable with it. He's the debt king. And so you're going to see that go up. And he's not even serious, Tony, about trying to limit the deficit. And when he starts talking about tariffs, he says, no, I'm just going to use it as leverage to get things to onshore manufacturing in the United States. So he's not really necessarily talking

about increasing the tariffs he just wants to use it as a leverage thing and that's the way he always used debt he uses debt as leverage for the bank so both of them are big spenders both of them don't care about any kind of you know responsible balanced government. And it's going to continue. I think what Trump learned early on is that he amassed so much debt going into the 1990s that he was more dangerous to the bank than the bank to him. And they needed him. And he really took him years. You know, he had people like Wilbur Ross come in, you know, who's Rothschild's agents and helped him to, you know, steer through that, navigate that.

There was huge losses of equity in the Taj Mahal, casino, all that stuff that imploded. He'd learned, he called himself the king of debt. I think there was a fallacy in it though, when you use that, you can use debt to a certain extent. If you're in the private sector and you become that big, that's true. But you're talking on a global stage, David, with that much on the line and GDP and all of that, the strategic strength of the United States relies on its currency. You start messing with that, that's very dangerous territory. So I would think that creating an environment where you could invite companies to come here and build things you can use tariffs for that but there has to be a combination of of safety in the currency

you can't just bully people you can't just say well i'm going to place 100 he said this is going to place 100 tariff on a country that's not utilizing the dollar well that's still weaponization of the dollar it's just a different strategy by other means so i i really think those those type of strategies i'm all for trying something new and i agreed with what trump said on the rogan interview about william mckinley being you know the tariff king and how well we did in the 19th century but it had there has to be this this debt issue and the currency issue has to be addressed you have to remember william mckinley had the gold standard yeah you know um that's you know that was the whole point of uh william

jennings bryan running against him and saying you know the the cross of gold speech that we had such a strong currency they wanted free silver injected into the into the economy to to uh lower the purchasing power of the dollar to get people out of debt so that was a that was a populist uh uh you know political uprising if you will so crucify the country on a cross of gold you needed liquidity from silver yeah right yeah that's where that hit the com stock low that's where you get you know know, um, the first, uh, Morgan silver dollar 1878. Um, you know, it's coming out of that. There was a massive silver hit, you know, in Nevada.

And then, so that's the, um, the banana that's right. That's the, uh, the TV show that Nixon would interrupt to take us off the gold standard. Yeah. We went out to Nevada, the Tahoe thing when thing when the kids were little um we went around some of those silver mines and everything that were out there i wanted to see where they'd film bonanza but you know we wound up doing the silver mines as well i was ponderosa yeah that's right the ponderosa they ran that thing for years they had the the cast the three of them um they set up a tourist resort around there but it's kind of deja vu to see that. But yeah, getting back to the silver standard, getting off on the tangent here.

It is when you look at Trump, he's willing to do these very risky things. And of course, the bad he was able to use that as leverage. But the bad thing was that he bankrupted casinos. And so the bottom line is that he eventually lost the casinos. What all he cared about with the Rothstein people was you're going to keep my name on the buildings, right? Until they completely go away.

And, and so if he's got his name on the U S he doesn't really care what's happening fundamentally with this stuff. I think it's going to be a very dangerous time, regardless of whoever is there. And it is because the same mentality is there with uniparty on so many of these different issues, but especially on the fiscal stuff, there's not going to be any change to it.

We're talking about it, you know, with, uh, uh, going back to, um, uh, his examples in the 19th century, the real issue was also spending. Right. And they're not going to stop the spending they're going to continue to double down on the spending and just rearrange the deck chairs let me let me give a tax break to this demographic voter group over here i won't put taxes i'll make a the policeman all tax-free no tax on tips for waitresses and that's the kind of games that they're playing so it doesn't got changed. I mean, history shows us that great empires of countries rise on sound money

and economic nationalism. They decline on fiat currency and free trade. Yeah. And that's where we're in that cycle right now. And until we hit some sort of wall, if you will, something where the music stops and there has to be, you know, people have to get, we have to have a sober look at our fiscal house. will something that uh where the where the music stops and there has to be you know there people have to get we have to have a sober look at our our fiscal house everything's you know up in the

air no we don't there's no telling um you know how bad it will get as far as what happens to the dollar or you know what kind of economic damage is done from just not getting our fiscal house in order again this is this is something that's not it's not in our politics it's not in this election it used to be and it begs a question like what what changed have they just decided uh to you know do a controlled demolition of this economy to replace it with size it is built back better in order to do that you have to first destroy something to build it back better so i I, that's really where my mind goes. Cause it doesn't seem like anything's being done to, to prop up,

uh, the dollar or economy. Uh, for a love of the road says, um, uh, Tony has said before he's referring to DGA about the, uh,

Tomahawk missile. So let me put that up there first. Uh, DGA says, uh, David, can you ask Tony, if we go to war,

we'll silver skyrocket. How much silver is in a Tomahawk missile? Uh, for the love of the road says, uh, David, can you ask Tony, if we go to war, we'll silver skyrocket. How much silver is in a Tomahawk missile? Uh, for the love of the road says he wants to say that there was about a hundred ounces of silver. And it was a monster. 500 ounces, 500. Wow. It's 500 ounce. It's a monster box.

It's a monster box, which is 500 ounces of silver and every Tomahawk missile. And, uh, I wonder how much co2 there is uh they don't care about anything you know they've got their goals are they and all the stuff that they're telling us is existential life-threatening and all that they don't care i mean their missiles are life-threatening uh that's uh we ought to be alarmed about that but they want us alarmed about co2 and eating meat it's just absolutely insane what we see coming from these people. How are things doing in terms of being able to get supply? That was always a thing.

You saw this coming. We could see what the fundamentals were. We knew that there was going to be this type of thing, and everybody's going to be scrambling for supply. And you said it starts hitting all these consecutive all-time highs. I think that's going to be the issue. How are things looking on that side? It's getting harder to get supply on a consistent basis.

And I'm really glad that I have the two physical gold and silver exchanges because pretty much any one-ounce silver rounds that I'm buying or coins or bars or even 10 ounce silver bars they all go into wolfpack you know because we have over 1300 members across the united states now and we get orders out like if your card is charged i'm getting that order out within 48 hours and you got a tracking number for that we don't keep uh we try to get the packages out to satisfy every order as fast as possible and it's been uh it's been tricky i had to front end load a lot of wolf pack for that and just replacing the same items

uh it's getting trickier uh and of course prices the price fluctuation david has been it's been interesting to um to keep track of to say the least you know when um gold especially you know with the price of gold going to where it is uh just having to cover that buying an ounce of gold so um i i'm built for it i i love what i do um but it is going to get dicier i think as as time goes on and you know you point out is that question uh from for love of the road about uh is the price of silver going to go up if we go into a hot war uh i think the price of silver is going up regardless yeah i don't i don't think there's anything that can stop it um and we're about i think we're we've reached really peak uh paper

silver uh the way that that trades and i've said this before but i think it's estimated that for every uh 250 or so ounces of silver that's traded in the paper market a one ounce of silver actually exists in the third dimension in the real world so physical one ounce to 250 ounce these things in this is going to uh come to a head eventually and again there's another metric to this too it's 225 million ounce deficit coming up this year it was over 200 million ounces last year so every time you run these you know uh 200 uh 200 plus million ounce deficits you have to take from the existing above ground supply it's not coming from mining so it has to continually come out of the above ground supply um you don't have to be a

math wizard to figure that out that you know eventually just you know basic economics kicks kicks in and we just haven't reached that point yet but it will happen yeah that's the thing about the paper gold and paper silver i i had started accumulating that uh years ago i guess maybe about 10 years ago and um you know putting our ira in it and and it was like uh then i know then the price started changing well you know it's going horizontal for a long time like that you didn't really notice anything and it's like oh okay this is easy and get a tenth of an ounce at a time and then gold started going up and it didn't go up you know and they didn't start tracking it and that's when i looked it's like what's going on with this why doesn't it track and that's when i found out oh well there's

this thing called shanghai gold exchange where they got it it's like oh okay so this is in china so nobody's actually checking this to see if they got anything at all i don't know what it is on gold you said it's 250 to one as estimate of your estimate of where it is on silver i imagine it is easily that way they create these derivatives and it just lets them completely escape any reality and manipulate the price of the real assets as well. At the same time, it's crazy.

Absolutely crazy. It's one of the reasons I think in the primary goal of BRICS is to reset commodity prices with their own exchanges. I mean, aside from the cross-border payments, I really don't think

when I read into this, and they may have developed some sort of unified currency, but I don't think so. I don't think those countries can agree on a real unified currency. I think it might be a unified payment system, like Vladimir Putin was talking about the BRICS bridge system. But really, David, in my opinion, reading what I do and looking into it, it's about the reset of commodity prices. It's no longer about de-dollarization it it's about the reset of commodity prices they do not it's no longer about you know de-dollarization it's about the west in general the way the west has run its markets and um you know had a stranglehold on commodities because in an era of fiat you have to control commodities against it if you really look at the historical trend to what happened in the 70s and you know this i mean you were there you're watching what happened with the rise in interest rates there was an alarm bell that went off in the

night you had paul volcker from the federal reserve they raised interest rates to the teens and why did they do that well because the money supply needed to be contracted and uh the purchasing power was going down and inflation was rampant and then it reflected itself in the price of gold and silver they put a stop to that and And it lasted for a while. It lasted until I was about, what, in 2005, going into that era. It lasted until I was about 25 years old. And then this trend has been up and up and up and sometimes taking a dip. But now, look at where we are now. And it really reflects the fiscal insanity you know and the amount of of currency creation the amount of debt and the just just absolute irresponsibility when

it comes to our budget it reflects in the price of gold and eventually you'll see it truly reflecting in the price of silver but you have to remember that the largest holder of silver in the world is JP Morgan Chase and JP Morgan Chase was convicted of suppressing the silver price and that's this gets lost on a lot of people why would you suppress the price of something that you primarily hold that's because you want to get more of it yeah that's what we saw during the real estate less attractive that's right it's what we saw during real estate stuff i remember when that all kicked off we had uh our neighbors uh refinance their home the interest rates were very low and dropping and they got some equity out of it and they thought well let's do that as well and but you know it was only just a couple weeks and

all of a sudden uh everything had changed it's like what how could it change that quickly and said well this is being imposed from california so i'm i'm looking it's like so why would they manipulate the market like this to make the real estate less valuable and as you point out along they're playing the long game uh they want to accumulate more of it so they they make it less valuable and they put a lot of people underwater and a lot of people lost their homes but they were able to accumulate them at an even cheaper price through all that stuff. And again,

it's part of it was the, you know, the, the derivatives market and all the rest of these things that they were playing with people. And that's what they're doing now with the commodities. And you're right. When you look at bricks,

it's all about the commodities, everything that they're talking about and getting a lot of these, um, getting on board, a lot of third world countries that are rich in natural resources and commodities. It is a big move toward the commodities. It truly is. Yeah. I mean, we looked at the gold supplanting the euro as becoming the second most held reserve asset by central banks, and number one being the dollar. I think really, if you're paying

attention, though, and if you're in the know, you get that gold is already the world's reserve currency. I think it supplanted the dollar some time ago. And it's just now playing a game of de-dollarization, getting out of those holdings. And how else that plays, it's a very interconnected worldwide economy, as you know. But the trend, and it's accelerating. I think we're just going to see this is going to continue to be and eventually will bleed into uh even though i know they don't want it mainstream will start having to cover this they'll have to actually admit that something is a foot and that commodities you know this boring thing you know gold this barbarous relic and you know what did uh what did warren buffett call it a pet rock that doesn't do anything. You know, it just sits there.

But I think, I think this will, this will be headlines, you know, again, mainstream will start covering the stuff that you and I talk about every week very soon because it'll be too large of an issue not to. Yeah.

Well, so next time we talk, it's going to be two days after the supposed election. And I imagine that there's going to be a lot of chaos from both sides. Nobody's willing to accept the other side winning, I think, on this time. So what do you think is going to happen? I mean, we look at the long-term trends of this stuff, and we were talking about regardless of which party is in power,

they're going to continue the debt accumulation and the spending without any responsibility so we know how the effect of that's going to be but in the short term i mean what do you think this if everything erupts into accusations of stolen election all the rest of stuff what you think that's going to really rock the markets this next week what are you looking for oh i think i think it has the possibility to and there's several things that could happen in scenarios. You know, if you if we know early, which I don't see how we could. But if we know like it's a sane country anymore, like there's an election result and then, you know, there's some sort of a consensus that hasn't been the trend.

But let's say we do. I think gold would pull back a little bit, depending on like if if if Trump wins is selected. I think gold would pull back a little bit. I think silver might pull pull back a little bit. Bitcoin would probably go up if you put that in reverse order where Kamala is selected. I think gold goes up. I think silver goes up. I think Bitcoin maybe goes sideways, maybe falls back a little bit. So that was really i think the two best case scenarios and then if we're in some knock down drag out legal battle and you know it stopped the steel part two the reckoning or whatever if we go into that then all bets are off uh i think uh i think the markets will start going their own way i think they'll just start you know saying this is a you know whether this fiscal, this is insanity over here on the ruling class side.

They'll start looking at alternatives. If we are in chaos, that is where fear goes right into the precious metals market because, again, it's a store of value. It is actual money, and it's physical, and it's outside of the system. It gives people the opportunity to at least house that wealth and energy and work and not have counterparty risk. So there's a lot of scenarios here, I think. But long term, David, you and I both know the trend for things that are finite in a world of fiat is up and to the right. And, you know, against it, you know, gold really has no top and the dollar really has no bottom. And that goes for silver and Bitcoin, too.

Yeah, yeah. Yeah, those are the things that get us outside of that fiat currency, the gold, silver, and Bitcoin. Uh, let me ask you, I see why you'd say that Trump be bullish for Bitcoin, because he's talked about it a lot and say, he's going to protect it. Maybe even use it, um, you know, have the government buy it and, and, uh, keep it as a store of value and that type of thing. Uh, and, uh, the Democrats have been very active to try to purge crypto, uh, Bitcoin, but all the crypto, uh, what about gold and silver though? Why do you say that that would, uh, perhaps, um, go down a little bit with

Trump and a little bit up with a law law, what's your thinking on that? Well, it may be short lived, but I think, um, when you see like a healthy stock market or people, and a lot of times when you see gold go up, it's because they look around and there's a lot of uncertainty and they just get out of those positions and get into gold think if uh you know the psychological impact of Trump and we saw that in 2016 and it was short-lived uh but and he won't it's not because of policy it'll just be like oh well there's a businessman he's he knows the markets you know he knows about he's going to be friendly or at least in rhetoric to Wall Street and Main Street. In rhetoric. It

doesn't even matter what he does. And the reason I say it's temporary, this is just my opinion. I think you'd see a slight pullback, and it may just go sideways. But I think there'd be some positions that would be cashed out because they're waiting to see what happens, and that'd be put back into the market. But you give it another quarter, and we're going to see, you might even see it within the 30 days, you would see another all-time high for gold because those trends are going to continue. But in the short run, I think psychologically you may see a little bit of a pullback, but maybe just sideways. Well, that's interesting. Of course, many of us are not day traders in anything, including gold and silver. It's a buy and hold

strategy, gradually accumulating it. That's what Wolfpack is so great at, that you can gradually start to have a savings plan where you can put stuff there and have kind of a wealth insurance with gold and silver. And so we know, we feel good about it in the long term, just looking at how people are going to perhaps be reacting to it in psychology. And we can all guess what that's going to be. Nobody knows for sure exactly. You've got a program that's going to be immediately following this one.

Tell everybody about that. And is there anything that is happening at Wise Wolf that you want to clue us on? Well, I would say, again, we have the free silver giveaway. It's still promo code 1776. You can go to davidknight.gold. We have the program starting as low as $50 a month for Wolfpack going all the way up to $5,000. And I have some announcements coming for Wolfpack soon. I'm working on some stuff.

I'm actually meeting. I'm in Florida right now. I have meetings going on that we're going to be bringing some new programs to Wolfpack that I'm really looking forward to. So, yeah, please, if you're in the market and you like physical precious metals and you want to trade your fiat in for something real, go to davidknight.gold.

And, yes, I have my radio show, the Arterburn Radio Transmission, every Thursday following your show on X, at Tony Arterburn, on Rockfin, the America Unplugged channel. You can find me on R uh, X, uh, at Tony Otterburn on Rockfin, uh, the America Unplugged channel. You can find me on Rumble as well, America Unplugged. Uh, and we do, we do an hour, uh, come over there and, and, uh, join the chat. Love to see you.

And that's what I like. I like the fact that you, like you said, you're in Florida looking at something to do with Wolfpack. Wolfpack is a very innovative thing. It's not anything that I've seen anybody else do. And I really do appreciate that. I appreciate working with you all these years. It's great to have somebody that can trust you.

And, um, and that certainly is the case with Tony Artvin and wise wolf. And you can get there through David and I dot goal. Thank you so much, Tony. Thank you for supporting the program. Thank you for coming on.

And it's going to be interesting times as the Chinese say, it's a curse. You know, we're going to have some really interesting times as the chinese say it's a curse you know we're going to have some really interesting times the next few years as we get closer and closer to this 2030 thing that is coming up and uh just right around the corner uh thank you so much for joining us and and for all you do thank you tony have a good day thank you david appreciate it and everybody don't forget this program is coming up right after this, and we'll be right back. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back.

And Eric, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. AP Rumble Seat writes, Build back better for the elites. They're obviously deliberately dismantling finance and society according to their ambitions for control. Oh, that is absolutely true. But let's talk about their move to dismantle society in terms of, um, uh, the, uh, or well-being things that they're doing to each and every one of us,

the depopulation shots, but also the eugenics. And this is something that has been on the horizon, uh, talked about with the IVF, uh, issues. And, um, and I understand we, I mean, we've been there from the standpoint of not being able to have kids. We didn't try IVF, but I understand, I mean, we've been there from the standpoint of not being able to have kids. We didn't try IVF, but I understand that desire. But this is a new U.S. company. This is a company that says that they can screen your embryos. So you create the embryos in a glass, right? In vitro fertilization and a

petri dish. And then they're going to genetically test them and determine what their IQ is and their height and their eye color. I talked earlier about the drone swarms and I talked about Daniel Suarez in his book that was Kill Decision. And he had another book that was really about genetic modification of humans. And he called that, let's see, what was it called? Change Agent, I think was the name of that. It's been a while since I listened to it. But the very beginning of it, I'll have to read it someday on the air

because it's such a brilliantly written exchange. listen to it but the very beginning of it i'll have to read it someday um on the air because it's such a brilliantly written exchange uh you have a couple that is pregnant and what they're saying is we can modify that baby and we can increase its um iq for x amount of dollars and if you want to we can do some other things we can do some things to make it you know the baby super strong or healthy or this or that so they have all these different modifications that they can do different aspects physical aspects make the baby taller or whatever we can modify the genetics on that and um and each of them came with a very big price tag and it was all in the black market because um this as these things came online people banned it but of course realistically it's going to happen in the black market and so as

he's got this scene set up you got this person who's trying to upsell them on their baby you know these different attributes that they're going to have out there and um and so you got the two parents one of them is for it. The other one is against it. And so he's kind of this interplay back and forth so that you see the, um, uh, the thoughts on either side. And final thing that he does is to say, well, if you don't do it, other people are going to do it. And your baby is going to wind up being the servant of these other kids. And on the other hand, if you do it for this baby, those traits are going to be passed on to future generations. So you're increasing the IQ or whatever of not just your child,

but also of your grandchildren and that type of thing. A very interesting scene that was there. And now we've got in real life, a new U S company raising concerns with embryo screening for IQ height, eye color, other things like that. An undercover journalist. So the other thing made me think about that book, undercover journalist goes in and starts talking to these people about how they can screen for this stuff.

They're not genetically modifying it yet, but what they would do is they would create a hundred embryos and then rank them by these different characteristics. And then you decide which one you want. You throw the rest of them away. An undercover journalist has found that a U.S. fertility startup company has pushed further into the world of eugenics with an alleged offer to allow wealthy clients to weed out their children based on their projected IQ, sparking more concern about the ethics of IVF and about genetic enhancement. The IQ testing controversy was exposed by a group called Hope Not Hate. They sent an undercover reporter to Heliospect Genomics posing as a potential customer seeking IVF with his partner. He was quoted $50,000 to use the screening tool PolygenX, which is marketed as a

way to analyze genetic data to find out which embryo will have the highest IQ. Let me just, as a parenthetical aside here, say that, how do we measure IQ? I mean, do we really trust that, right? It's different. As I look at it, I have come across so many people in so many different walks of life that have different aptitudes and abilities. And so how do you test that? I don't think that you can sort people by these IQ tests, first of all. I mean, it's just so many different types of people

and there's different types of gifts. And like I've said many times, you might have somebody who's very gifted academically in terms of writing and reading and stuff like that, but maybe they can't figure out how to fix anything or build anything. And somebody else, who's I've typically seen this type of intelligence, somebody who can be an absolute mechanical genius, but they don't talk, they don't write, they can't do any of that kind of stuff. So how do you rank this? And do we want a society where everybody is going to be above average in school,

but they can't do anything? I mean, there's different types of intelligence that are out there. And then the issue is, how in the world could they possibly, as difficult as it is to measure aptitude and intelligence and things like that with us, how in the world are they going to do this with an embryo? How are they going to look at the genetics there? I don't think it's going to be very reliable.

Maybe they'll use a PCR test for intelligence, right? Because it is something of an intelligence test, isn't it? Danish CEO of this company pushed this as a way to help every parent to have all the children they want and have children that are basically disease-free, smart, healthy. It's going to be great, he said. Yeah, we're going back to that scene from the Daniel Suarez book at the very beginning. The reporter also participated in several online meetings with Heliospec and was presented with a company's

polygenic scoring service. It said that selecting the 10 smartest embryos would allegedly lead to an IQ gain of about six points. Well, that's not all that much anyway. It would also screen the embryos for height, for obesity, and even for acne. You see, this is where I call BS. If you're going to tell me down to that level of detail, I think this is a con game, but this is where the ethics are headed. The issue is not whether or not these people are actually able to do it, but the ethical decisions as they continue to try to go down this path, if they were able to do this, they score these embryos.

So how do they determine this? Well, they score the embryos based on a database. They call it a biobank. In the UK, they've started creating a taxpayer-funded biobank of genetic information. These are people who have voluntarily agreed to share their genetic data for life. And so what they're trying to do is find a correlation between the real world and what they see in the genes. And these people are volunteers in that. They said, however, the information of those who volunteer,

people are mostly white, wealthy individuals, and because of this, they said, well, that's of those who volunteer, people are mostly white, wealthy individuals. And because of this, they said, well, that's going to skew the results. You can't necessarily extrapolate this into other ethnic groups necessarily. The company is staffed by supporters of eugenics, like a guy who calls himself Jonathan Anomaly, although his last name was Beres, and he legally changed it. In 2020, this guy, Jonathan Anomaly, published a book, Creating Future People, in which he argued in favor of eugenics and said eugenics became a dirty word because the Nazis and the Holocaust. He's defended liberal eugenics as a way to allow parents to be free and maybe even encouraged to use technology to improve their children's prospects. Well, no, it's simply what it is, is it's a thing that denigrates people. It's a system that allows

people to play God based on what they think the values should be. In the same way that people who decide they're going to set in a position of censorship. Well, I will decide what is true. I will decide what information people should have out there. And it is usually they're wrong about that. Polygenics is expected to go public in 2025. But they said to this guy, they said, said well there's already babies on the way despite the fact that that is prohibited in the uk however it is completely legal in the u.s and so that is the way

they kind of got around this now as we move further into this and we see people's attitudes, and we're just talking about embryos, but there was an interesting article on the Daily Mail talking about a wealthy couple having a baby using surrogates. And listen to what this couple did and look at their attitude toward human life, their attitude toward the babies, their attitude toward the surrogate mother as well. So the Daily Mail reported the story of Marty and Melinda Rangers, a couple whose quote-unquote busy careers prevented them from having a family, but not from getting wealthy and retiring to the Caribbean.

From the beginning, they treated the process as one in which the surrogate's body belonged entirely to them. The surrogate they chose spoke to them twice a week, but they also noted, kept watch over the woman's social media for any sign that she was violating their lengthy contract then one day they spotted her online having what appeared to be an alcoholic drink she said it was all going fine with our surrogate president pregnancy until melinda saw that instagram said marty it was a complete shock for us and when we confronted her about it she said it was water that she was drinking,

but there was something about her reaction that left me unconvinced. After much deliberation, we decided the best thing to do would be to terminate our baby at 20 weeks. So I see a picture. They said, well, I'm not sure. She has alcohol. I don't know, but let's rip the baby apart and smash its skull. Yeah, that's what they did. It was a tough decision, they said, but the trust had been broken, and we were unsure of what else this woman was capable of. Now, this baby was completely theirs in terms of genetics. It's just kind of they're renting a womb, you know?

Womb for rent. There is no indication that they underwent testing of any kind to see if the baby had been affected by the one drink. Instead, they merely ordered the surrogate to kill their child in the second trimester, and she complied. And as Live Action says, according to their retelling of the story,

the surrogate was 20 weeks pregnant. The baby was not far from being able to survive outside the womb. The most common abortion procedure at this point in pregnancy is dilation and evacuation, D&E. During this procedure, the abortionist literally rips the baby apart

limb by limb then crushes the baby's skull as i said when i was talking about that abortionist he said you know you got the baby's skull when you see this white um you know gelatinous material ooze out uh they kept watch over the woman's social media after they did it. They've got another, uh, surrogate and they kept watch over her social media, uh, to, uh, see what was happening with it as well. They didn't just do it once they got a different surrogate and tried it again. Um, so he says, uh, but you don't need to worry about what happened with this first one, you know, even though she had an abortion she was well compensated he said for agreeing to undergo the abortion paid her a bonus so she'd kill their baby

the couple then switched to another agency which cost nearly twice as much but they were still not satisfied uh she refused to get a covid vaccine The baby was healthy. The rangers decided to go on to have yet another baby using a third surrogate. For our second child, we got them to commit more explicitly that they would follow medical orders on pregnancy, whether it's vaccines or diet or whatever it may be. You should always give pregnant women every vaccine possible, right? Think about how that's changed in just the last decade. They used to always exempt pregnant women.

Now they target them specifically with these vaccines. So Marty described that the third and final experience renting another woman's womb was, quote, like something out of a disney movie unquote he said she was so happy for us and happy to meet that baby but she also had the attachment of having raised the baby for nine months that's their words so they know that the baby that they had killed was a baby they acknowledge it they don't try to call it a fetus or anything that they acknowledge it was a baby and I just

killed the baby anyway well this article is talking about as I've mentioned before and it just never ceases to appall me when I see all of these people many of them part of something called the New Apostolic Reformation, all around Trump praying for his political power and everything, but not praying for the man. As this one person said, there's something like vultures. He said these vultures are steeped in the brew of something they call the seven mountain mandate. They feast on the souls that they have lured in with promises of defined authority and earthly power. Yeah, the prosperity gospel these people have been prospering off of materially is a natural fit for Trump.

With his love of Norman Vincent Peale and self-help stuff like that and seeing God essentially as a lucky charm. God's this lucky charm is going to bring me prosperity. Go get a rabbit's foot or something if you want to do something. They preach a gospel of personal conquest and gain, not the good news of Christ. They offer a gospel that glorifies man, that flaunts wealth, that exalts earthly authority as if the kingdom of God could be brokered like a business transaction. Their false prosperity gospel is an intoxicating blend of self-worship and national conquest, a recipe that ensnares followers under the

guise of God-giving mandates, but ultimately leaves them drained, exploited, and spiritually bankrupt. But I've got to say, this isn't limited to just the immediate circle around Trump, these people who take selfies of themselves praying with Trump so they can be seen of men, right? What did Jesus say about that? But the question is, are people who are saying we need, and again, vote for whoever you want in the privacy of the voting booth, but if you're going to go out there and jump on board a bandwagon, if you're going to go out there and yoke yourself to one of these corrupt

politicians, are you practicing the prosperity gospel? Well, you know, there's a lot of stuff about Trump I don't like, but I think things are going to be better for me under him. So yeah, let's jump on board that. This guy said evangelicals should be gravely concerned about this strange parade of spiritual deception. The true gospel that's rooted in repentance and faith and the only living God who saves has been nearly drowned out beneath a self-serving narrative that urges believers to seize influence. That's what these people are doing. They were gathering around trump and a lot of people who

are not a part of this club and never will be a part of this club want to be on the winning team i watched this when they would have the fake elections going all the way back to when i was in junior high school and they would ask all the kids you know and it's like well a lot of the kids said they want to be on the winning side so it it's whoever the media is telling them is ahead in the polls. They want to be on that side. Well, there's a lot of different rationale for supporting one of these other. But the reason I mentioned this is because this guy says, yeah, Trump is lost. He's spiritually dead. And Satan has seized on that with these false teachers. No denying it. But, he says, given the role of the president, look at the alternative and ask yourself if you can live with the blood of millions of babies on your hands.

That's right. We should ask ourselves that. Now, is it just abortion? Or is it just abortion or is it wars and if it's wars is there any difference between the two of them I don't think so what about the what can you live with the blood of not just millions of babies or tens of millions of babies but what about the lives of tens of millions of people worldwide whose lives have been destroyed because of the treachery and the lives of tens of millions of people worldwide whose lives have been destroyed because of the treachery and the lies of Donald Trump?

And putting this out, the father of the vaccine, the father of lies about the vaccine, the father of lies about the satanic vaccine. Can you live with that? Because I can't. I can no more support him than I can support this satanic sex worker who elevates abortion. Even when she goes into places,

they call churches. Yeah. She comes in with her white coats and she's got 10 abortion doctors who can't be bothered or don't know what to do when somebody has a medical emergency during their speech. Yeah, she wants to kill babies. She bought into all this vaccine stuff as well. But so did he. And I cannot support either one of them. But, you know, that's your choice to make.

But it is just a desperate attempt to have some relevance and to think that you're going to get what you want. This person, for example, an apologist, a Christian apologist, explains the role that Christians play in the crisis ahead of Election Day. And again, all this is predicated on the idea that I think is, because of my experience in politics, I think it's absolutely foolish to think that you're going to change anything. And that is especially true of presidential politics. Even if you live in one of the seven states, pretty much the other ones,

it's so much in one direction that your vote isn't going to make any difference. But even in those seven states, I don't think it's going to make a difference. With new data suggesting that more than 100 million people of faith, including Christians, Mormons, Jews, Muslims, might sit out the 2024 election, one apologist is suggesting that believers are, in at least part, responsible for the problems plaguing this country. And I agree, but not in the way that he says. Dr. Jeff Myers of Summit Ministries,

because these people don't know where the battle is. The battle is not at the ballot box, and the battle is not one day, and it is not one action that you take on that one day. And that's the big issue that I have with all this election hand-wringing and fire alarms and flashing red lights and all the rest of this stuff. It's going to be the most important election of your life. No, every day is an important one. 68% of people that they talk to, these are Christians, he said,

say they don't have an interest in politics. Well, politics is still interested in you, and I'm not saying that we reject it. I'm saying you better watch these people. They're dangerous. You just don't have to join them. I mean, you think of them as like some kind of a criminal gang, right?

You watch that criminal gang, and you know what they're coming after, but you don't join the Bloods or the Crips. 57% say they dislike both major candidates. Well, again, there's other elections that are local. There might be something that you could do there. 55% say they don't believe either candidate reflects their most important values. 52% say they don't believe their vote will make a difference in the outcome. And I certainly think that is the case for present.

But this person says, and I've heard this argument before, we're obligated as Christians to be good citizens of the place in which we find ourselves. So, and we talked about this with friends um so uh if you live in rome let's pretend for a moment that you had a vote in rome who do you support nero or caligula what kind of support and of course you know you might make a choice between one of them for some reason that you think one of them is maybe gonna to single you out in a way that the other one isn't. But would you ever want to go around with a hat that says vote for Nero or vote for

Caligula? That's my point about endorsing this stuff. And then he gets this exactly upside down. He said the founders of the U.S. focused on the core principles first. They didn't focus on personalities. Then they developed policies that could bring us to those principles. Well, yeah, I mean, ideally we would have something like that, but what principles have we seen debated by La La and Trump? None. They don't want to have debates and when they did get together once what they talk about each other they talked about each other's personality so

they're the ones not us who are focusing everybody's attention on personality and uh there is absolutely um nobody coming to the rescue to ask them any of the questions. And so he says, so when he talks about this, when he talks about personality, I found it interesting that he doesn't talk about character because if you don't talk about character, what does it mean to talk about core principles that then develop into

policies? If somebody doesn't have integrity, about core principles that then develop into policies. If somebody doesn't have integrity, can you trust them on a personal level? Can you trust them in terms of having principles or changing those principles into policies? What about the people who are so obviously lacking in integrity that they won't even talk about principles or policies? The difference, he says, between the founders of this country and where we are now is that voters have inverted this triangle of building up from core principles to policies and so forth.

He says, we're making decisions based on personalities rather than principles and policies. So you have Trump because, you know, seizing on the comments, it's like every day it's a, from one side or the other, a gotcha thing. Well, you know, the comedian said this about, uh, uh, Puerto Ricans at the, um, the Madison square garden thing. So we're going to run a couple of days on that and everybody's going back and forth on it.

And, you know, it was a sort of thing where it's not uh the kind of humor that i like i never liked um uh who was the guy that don rickles i hated that uh stuff and it became a really big thing back in the 70s is roasting stuff i don't like that kind of comedy but uh you know that's what this guy does and uh john stewart um actually defended him on that and said he kind of has a sense of humor that's not your style of comedy but he goes it's not racist but they seize on this stuff and so you know because he says that puerto rico is an island of garbage then biden says no the supporters are garbage and so then trump flies in on his personal jet and puts on a garbage man's outfit with a reflective vest. And he rides around in a garbage truck to go to the rally.

This is silly stuff. This is really serious stuff. You want to tell me like Musk is telling people like Alex is telling people, oh, this is the most important election ever. It's like, seriously, they don't seem to be taking it very seriously, do they? I mean, it's all about playing gotcha and having insults and building on those insults to insult the other side. Well, that is their personality. And it tells you something about their integrity.

And so I would say that these candidates don't have any integrity, that this is all just as superficial as their McDonald's jobs. And the superficial marketing that they're doing about their personality, just like all their promises about the money that they're going to hand out to targeted voter demographics. Maybe they'll do that. Maybe they won't. A lot of people are going to be very disappointed if they don't get this stuff. But, you know, this person says, so my recommendation is that we go back to the way the founders did it.

We got to start with principles and then with policies. And then we got to deal with the personalities of this stuff. Well, again, you're not going to get any of that if these people don't have any integrity. And where is the integrity on our side? Don't we have a responsibility, if we are people of integrity, to hold them responsible for what they have done when they violate that?

Or should we just say, forget about it. I don't really care what he did. I don't care that he vaccinated people. I don't care they spent three and a half trillion dollars. I don't care they did gun control by executive order. None of that stuff matters. What does that say about our integrity when we do that? If we don't have integrity, we're not going to have leaders who have integrity because we're picking those people ultimately. And if we don't have the integrity to walk away from this stupid pageant so you can participate in if you wish i'm just saying don't get caught up in it because it's a game and they are trolling people in this game dg8 thank you for the tip says dave please look

into the project esther from the heritage foundation it shreds the first amendment and trump said he is for it project esther i will look that up i know that they were making claims about um and one of these churches they went into they're making claims about lala being like esther you know you picked for such a time as this and so forth um i don't know but i'll look that up. Uh, project Esther. Um, I have not really looked that much of the project 25. I know that that's become a big thing for the left and, you know, Trump, uh, has said that he doesn't like project, uh, 25, but if he bought into project Esther, I'll take a look at it.

But I don't think I've said, I don't think that this is another one of these things. I don't, just as I don't think that either Trump or Lala is going to do anything for fiscal solvency, they're not going to stop spending. They don't care about the deficit and neither of them cares at all about the first amendment, not at all. And, uh, so, you know, they're, they're doing everything that they can to, um, uh, to put out there and to threaten people with censorship uh jason barker i don't know david six points is the difference between brain dead and aoc that's good i like that talking about uh finding a an embryo that's got a six

point iq that's a good joke jason. For the love of the road. Thank you for the tip. Whenever you mention change agent always reminds me of Gattaca. Yeah. With Ethan Hawke. Yeah. The world will probably be like that someday. Eugenics and transhumanism are definitely on the new world order wishlist.

And if you remember the key thing about Gattaca, he had to pretend that he was somebody else because they looked at his genetics and said, no, you're going to stay in this job forever. Right? Like brave new world, Plato's Republic and everything. had to pretend that he was somebody else because they looked at his genetics and said, no, you're going to stay in this job forever. Right? Like brave new world, Plato's Republic and everything. They always want to pigeonhole people. No, you're going to be, you're an Epsilon. We bred you for an Epsilon. We're never going to let you try. And so he's like, you know, trying to get other people's DNA to pass off as, uh, uh,

being, um, you know, a different class of people that they've engineered than somebody else. I tell you, there's just so much that can be done with science that is evil. And these people have really hijacked it. Matthew Ronson, thank you for a tip. He said, God's blessing to David,

his family, his true friends, and associates in Jesus' name. Thank you very kindly. Flower Sower, thank you very much. That's very kind. Grateful for your dedication and faithfulness in proclaiming the good news of our lord jesus christ and his generous mercies that helps to counter the negative news in the world around us i don't know what i wouldn't be able to do this program with all the bad news in the world if it wasn't for the good news is that contrast between light and darkness uh that each of us needs to be able to

see well we're going to take a very short break and we're going to be right back and i'm going to talk about the censorship that is now expanding to removing entire websites very very quickly we'll be right back. You're listening to the david knight show well we had a news site that was uh very critical of u.s foreign policy that was hacked and then even removed from the web now it kind of appears to be back it's consortium news when i went to it yesterday, I only saw, though, a French version of it, not an English version of it. That might tell us something about who the hackers are. It might be that it is the people who are running

U.S. foreign policy that they're critical of. As I talked about many times, you know, in August of 2018, August 6th, that was when the social media hammer hit on Infowars and all of us that work there. And then within two months, I talked about this recently, the Free Thought Project, guys. Within two months, Free Thought Project and about 800 sites, most of them were critical of U.S. foreign policy.

It wasn't really the Trump sites, but it was all the people that were there were against the police state, against the surveillance state, usually against U.S. foreign policy. All disappeared real quickly from social media. Now you've got Consortium News, which has been critical of U.S. foreign policy, disappearing from the web. That's the next step. WikiLeaks put out security state critical U.S. news site Consortium News has been hacked and replaced. So this is something that goes back to the 1980s. Robert Perry, who died in 2018 at the age of 68, founded it, and he had broken a lot of news on Consortium News.

I guess this is why it rang a bell. That's not something that I typically look at. He broke a lot of news about the Iran Contra garbage as being done by Bill Casey, the CIA guy running the Reagan administration. And they had a lot of very important archives there, and they deleted it. Now, again, it's still kind of in an indeterminate state. Same thing is happening with the Wayback Machine. They don't want to have the Wayback Machine, the Internet Archive.

It's been under attack. And that was a very valuable source of information. They want to memory hole a lot of stuff. And, you know, the U.S. government, they say some other hackers too, but the people, look at who's going to benefit from this. Who's got the motivation for doing this. Who has a technical ability to do this.

It's been under attack for a long time and they've been able to shut it down, at least to the extent that, um, you know, some archives are there now, but it was completely gone for a few weeks and now it's kind of back, but you can't really search it. It's not able to do new stuff. We just had a listener who was saying, take a look at Project Esther. It's anti-free speech. Well, we'd only have to look at that to know what Trump and Lala think.

There was an article on Reason about Trump thinking that news outlets should lose their broadcast licenses, even when they have none. Well, they do talk briefly about Lala, but this is a problem both of them have. Look, she comes after Twitter and social media because that's what's opposed to her. The rest of the mainstream media, they like her, so she's going to leave them alone. Trump is just the opposite way. He said, despite his cluelessness, the former president's inclination to punish constitutionally protected speech reflects his authoritarian disregard for civil liberties. And so we know where they stand on these issues. They're not going to come out and necessarily say it, but in this particular case, he did. And it was all because of personal vendettas.

Last November, he complained that MSNBC, quote, uses free, all uppercase, free government-approved airwaves to execute a 24 hour hit job on John Donald J. Trump and the Republican party for the purposes of all uppercase election interference. He said, well, first of all, MSNBC, as many people pointed out,

it was not a broadcast thing. So it didn't have a involvement with the FCC. Uh, but then he came after some of these other outlets, ABC, CBS, because he didn't like the way, CBS, because he didn't like the way they covered him or he didn't like the way they covered Lala Harris.

Now they are part of the FCC, but as reason pointed out, he was doing this when he was president in the first term. Nobody wants to talk about how he hated the first amendment in his first term during his first year. As a matter of fact, as president, he suggested that NBC and the networks, quote unquote, should lose their licenses because of their partisan, distorted, and fake news coverage, he said. He said it's bad for the country and it's not fair to the public. Ajit Pai, the Republican chair of the FCC at the time, pushed back and he said,

the FCC, under my leadership, will stand for the First Amendment, and under the law, the FCC does not have the authority to revoke a license of a broadcast station based on the content of a particular newscast. There was a thing called the Fairness Doctrine, and they used that to threaten and to intimidate and to shut down broadcast stuff. And it was a lifting of the Fairness Doct doctrine that allowed Rush Limbaugh to get very big,

that allowed all of conservative radio to get very big. We want to be able to have freedom of ideas and debate and all the rest of this stuff. And yet Trump went on with Dan Bongino on the October 18th program. And he said, it's a very embarrassing moment for them, he said to Dan Bongino. But the media is not pressing it. You would think that the media would be pressing it. And I go a step further. It's so bad that they should lose their license and they should take 60 minutes off the air.

And of course, Dan Bongino immediately said, haven't you read the Constitution? Don't you know that'd be a violation of our God-given rights of free speech? No, Dan Bongino cheers him on. Dan Bongino cheers him on. Dan Bongino cheers him on. He doesn't challenge this guy. He's going to lick his boots. That's Dan Bongino we're talking about. News organization doesn't have to be licensed.

That is the antithesis of free speech. And again, he doesn't care about that at all. And yet now we've got the Democrats, just in case you think that they're any different, they want to come after social media. They say, we've got all this misinformation about the hurricane. See, the Uniparty, Democrat and Republican, hates free speech. They hate the free press. They hate you having information.

See, winning has been the focus of these people not principles that's why it is naive to think that we're going to build on principles and then policies and that these people are going to have the integrity to put it through we don't even have the integrity to throw them out and reject them when they violate our fundamental principles and And that comes back to us. Instead, what do we do? We cheer them. Just amazing. This election is like being back in 2020 again.

Thank you for joining us. Have a good day. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions.

Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.