The David Knight Show - 3Jan24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Episode Date: January 3, 2024

(2:00) Left & Right media report Epstein list focusing or either Clinton or Trump (but not both), protecting their favorite candidates(23:45) David Axelrod (Obama campaign), James Carville (Cilnton campaign) know that the false "trumped up" charges against Trump are making him more and more popular. So the question is why do they continue to do it? Do they WANT Trump as President again? Election rigging ALWAYS began with restricting ballot access. No one cared until it was done to Trump and they STILL don't care about fixing it for anyone BUT Trump(41:03) Another Over-the-Top SWAT of a Jan6 FamilyThis is why I speak and will continue to speak about what Trump and Alex Jones did with Jan6. A family is SWATTED over J6 shows the extreme police state the USA has become. As the only family member not facing years of jail, the family's mother/wife speaks about what happened on J6 and with the SWAT raids as her husband and 3 sons face long jail sentences — for NO CRIMES committed.(52:30) Julie Green, false Trump prophetess of the ReAwaken America sham, has another prophecy about Trump(56:00) Infant is placed on the police state's watchlist because his dad is a J6 defendant(57:00) Elections: Nancy Mace is the latest Republican to whine about how pro-life laws are harming her precious political "career". She is uniquely situated to educate people about the reality of abortion but REFUSES to do so, as the rest of her Republican colleagues.(1:00:27) NUKE-Y Haley doesn't meet citizenship requirements to run for President…here's why(1:10:31) Dave Chapelle explains transgenderism(1:18:50) Gov DeWine vetoes bill protecting minors from trans-mutilating surgery & chemicals after taking $40,000 from medical complex that profits from mutilating children. But it's not the first time he sold out to them. A look at his $1M jab lottery and Ramaswamy's complicity in the DeWine lockdowns & tyranny(1:31:33) Methodists ban terms like husband, wife, mother, father(1:35:05) Man's destruction of baphomet display in state capitol, sparks debate amongst Republicans and Christians — should we remain neutral? Here's why we should SMASH this "satan" SCAM(1:46:06) Debt reaches $34 TRILLION! Soon interest payments will be TRILLIONS. And the corporate/government alliances that are competing to create a global CBDC(2:03:34) INTERVIEW - Finally, Fluoride on Trial Ryan Cristian, TheLastAmericanVagabond.com, on fluoride trial with national consequences, the last interview of pathologist Arne Burkhardt, and another vaccine race and human experimentation in Gaza (2:54:17) Christopher Hitchens vs John Lennox — Is God Good? Is there a basic conflict between science and religion?Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. But MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy.

I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough. You can find Happy Enough wherever you listen to podcasts. Using free speech to free minds.

You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 3rd of January, year of our Lord, 2024. Well, today we're going to take a quick look at the news, but we're going to get into developments in the election. I've got, it's going to be a long year for me. I've already got people who have been longtime listeners and supporters upset with me for criticizing Trump. And I have to wonder, what were they hearing for the last three years? But we're also going to take a look at who is behind CBDC. The different banks and crypto organizations that are pushing this very hard and what it means for us.

And we'll be joined in the third hour by Ryan Christian of the Last American Vagabond. He has been on this fluoride thing for a very long time, and it is finally coming to trial this month. And so we're going to get an update on that, as well as some other things he's been tracking. We'll be right back well the epstein list was supposed to be released yesterday, we were told. It didn't happen, and so Babylon Bee has a story about that. The Epstein list hangs itself moments before its release. In a shocking turn of events, the Epstein list was found hanging in a secure document storage facility this morning.

This is such a tragedy for many of us who desperately wanted to know who was on that list, said security expert Hillary Clinton. Now we'll sadly never know. My thoughts and prayers are with the family of this Epstein list. May it rest in peace. Well, it is kind of interesting. We saw over the Christmas break that Tucker is now talking about the Epstein murder in prison. You know, it's kind of like Building 7.

He said, you can't do anything about Building 7. You can't talk about that or you'll get fired. Well, you've been fired now, Tucker. Why don't you talk about it? Tell us what you think. Point out what's going on. People are listening and they're wondering what you think about this. Unless, maybe you're not fired. Maybe you're still working for the CIA. But Representative Burchett here in Tennessee

says he expects the Epstein client list cover up to continue. He says, what I want is the client list. You know, you've got these skeevy old dudes that everybody says, well, they've gone and had sex on this island. What's the big deal? Well, no, they haven't. They've done an act of violence against a child. And they need to be burned on that, he said. That's the list that we need. And he said, I hope they get burned. Every one of them.

You know, the Bible's pretty clear on what God thinks of people who mess with a child. I think the American public needs to stand up and do something right. Finally, and demand that both sides of the aisle, we need to wash our hands of this deal. He says, I don't care which side of the aisle you're on. If you are on the Epstein list, you should pay the consequences. Really? We don't care if it's Republican or Democrat?

We don't care even if it is Trump? Trump? There he is. Trump and Melania and Jeffrey and Ghislaine. And here they are. It looks like Melania is enjoying herself there. As we go back and forth, the four of them. A foursome right there.

Burchett said he also accused Senator Dick Durbin of perpetuating the cover-up to protect his friend, Bill Clinton. Well, you know, again, it's Clinton. It was people like RFK Jr. who were on the plane. And, of course, Trump. Trump, who had him not just on the plane, but he was also at Trump's parties. And Kevin Spacey, who Tucker interviewed in character to try to bring back his career, I guess. Kevin Spacey, not only his connections to jeffrey epstein but his connections to davos the king of davos he was you know he was entertaining all of them on an

annual basis deeply tied to all those people very much like another actor uh mal McDowell, who has played in this X-rated Caligula. He was in Clockwork Orange and all the rest of this stuff. It's interesting, isn't it? It's kind of like, I don't know if these guys are good actors or not. Maybe they're just like John Wayne, who always played the same character everywhere he went because he's playing himself. Maybe Malcolm McDowell and Kevin Spacey are playing themselves. And maybe Trump and the GOP is playing you as well. They don't want to talk about his involvement.

As a matter of fact, the only people who want to talk about it is the left press. And I thought it was very interesting to see that Newsweek headlines, Trump, Donald Trump flights on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express. What we know, and they talk about it. And, of course, they say, well, we suspect he's there, but we don't have any evidence of it yet. And then they say the same thing at the very end of the article.

There's one little paragraph saying, oh, we don't know anything about Bill Clinton either, right? That's their only mention. But the most, the entire article from Newsweek is focused on Trump and Epstein. Whereas when you look at all the MAGA bird press, you know, Breitbart, Infowars, WND, conservative press, you will see it's all about Clinton. They don't mention Trump. Isn't that interesting? I really do hope that we have something like what Andy Burchard is saying. We need to burn these people regardless of their political affiliations, and yet the press is not doing that. We have a press that is so incredibly partisan that even on something like this,

even on pedophilia, they toe the line. I got to say, going back years and years, when we look at Dennis Hastert, longest-serving GOP Speaker of the House, a wrestling coach pedophile in high school. The GOP reached out to him and had him run for Congress. I mean, what? I'm not saying that you can't run for Congress as a wrestling coach, but I suspect that his primary qualification was that he was blackmailable. And so they coalesced around him, coalesced around him, and then they made him speaker for a very long time.

And they had their page scandals of a Republican congressman who was accused of grooming pages, minors in Congress for sex. And you had Dennis Hastert go on with Rush Limbaugh, and they just blew it away as partisan criticism. And there was two scandals that were like that, and Dennis Hastert would go on with Rush Limbaugh, and they would explain it away. This is just partisan stuff.

No, you're excusing this conduct is partisan and um i don't know i didn't listen to rush much at the time after dennis astert was uh charged after it was found out that he was being blackmailed by this guy he was charged for taking his money out and trying to avoid detection taking the money out, structured withdrawals. That's not a crime. Should not be a crime. It is against their law, but it is not a crime. Should never be a crime.

There's no excuse for a law like that. But that's what they used to put him in jail. And the judge even, when he put him in jail, he even referenced the pedophilia. We need to get rid of that statute of limitations. And we need to come after, and the reason they don't come after, the reason they don't get rid of the statute of limitations is because of people like Dennis Astert and Donald Trump and Bill Clinton and RFK Jr.

and the rest of them. So yeah, it is a truly amazing to show how partisanship and the worship of men in power can blind you to the most heinous acts, isn't it? Trump's son, Eric, says Newsweek is also listed on a flight in 1995. He would have been 11 at the time, he says. So again, that's, he's a minor, but, so perhaps that wasn't about any of that, but they bring that up in Newsweek. They have every little detail about Trump's life,

just like the conservative press will have every little detail about Bill Clinton being there. Trump and Epstein were associates for years in the 80s and 90s. In a 2002 interview with New York Magazine, Trump said, I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. Lots of fun to be with. It's even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do. Many of them are on the younger side, no doubt, he said.

Well, you know, he was also friends, Trump was, with Alex Acosta, the guy who prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein. The guy who worked out a sweetheart deal with Jeffrey Epstein's two lawyers, Alan Dershowitz, who's now a big Trump supporter and defender. And with Ken Starr, who's now deceased, but Ken Starr went on to, you know, he had essentially covered up for Bill Clinton. Isn't that interesting? You know, the degrees of separation. You got Ken Starr, who's brought in as a special prosecutor for Bill Clinton. He ignores all the financial irregularities. He ignores all the credible allegations of violence and rape against women. He focuses on Clinton committing perjury about a consensual affair with Monica Lewinsky.

That's the basis of it all. Ignores all the rest of the stuff. All the crime, corruption, sexual assault, and rape was ignored by Ken Starr. And then the next time he shows up in a big public forum is to defend Jeffrey Epstein. And Ken Starr, who was touted as this big Christian goes on to Baylor, which is supposed to be a Christian school. And as president of Baylor, he covers up for the football players, uh, rape or alleged rape or whatever.

I don't know how that case turned out. And then they kicked him out. And so Alan Dershowitz, Alex Acosta was brought back to be the labor secretary and it was Trump's first pick for labor secretary. But I'm sure there's no connection at all between Trump and Epstein, right? All you Trump supporters out there, you're telling me, oh, you're just a Trump. You're right. I do hate Trump.

I hate what he has done. I really do. There are never any suggestions that Trump had sex with other women who were trafficked by Epstein. Clinton also has denied knowing about Epstein's offenses or visiting the island. With no flight logs existing, suggesting otherwise, says Newsweek, as we're about to see this stuff released. A little preliminary leak talking about, I forget how many times it was. Was it 75, 150 times, whatever it was that Bill Clinton has listed in the flight logs. And so after Epstein was taken into custody in New York

2019, Trump changed his tune. Well, I was not a fan of his, I can tell you that. Well, he was a fan of Alex Acosta. He was a fan of Dershowitz and he was a fan of Jeffrey Epstein for decades. So as we look at the corruption in Hollywood and people like Kevin Spacey, now that Mickey Mouse is in the public domain, the early Mickey Mouse, a steamboat, Willie Mickey Mouse on, um,

12 Oh one AM of the new year. One minute past midnight. You had a trailer come out of a Mickey Mouse horror film. This is where Hollywood is. Sex violence, depravity. Isn't it amazing? You know, as Winnie the Pooh, when it went into the public domain, why they do, they did a horror film, a real schlocky horror horror film which is probably what this is as well winnie the pooh blood and honey

well now they've got a mickey mouse horror film because we have these characters that used to be portrayed as wholesome and of course disney is probably kicking themselves we're not thinking of making a Mickey Mouse and Winnie the Pooh horror film themselves. Cause that's where they are. Yeah. Maybe they could have turned it into some kind of a sex depravity thing with Disney.

After all, these are animals who identify as humans, right? The original trans species, I guess. Mickey's mouse trap is the name of this new piece of filth. They use clips from the 1928 animated classic Steamboat Willie, shown interspersed with newly shot footage that tells the story of a mouse mask-wearing killer

who stalks college-age kids at an arcade. Well, at least they point out that people who wear masks are insane, right? That's one thing that we can learn from the last few years, isn't it? I thought it was interesting that George Soros, the guy who has been opposing law enforcement and district attorneys and spending millions of dollars to put and district attorneys and spending millions of dollars to put in district attorneys that are going to turn criminals loose to create chaos on our streets.

He was swatted. He was swatted. George Soros was swatted. In other words, somebody makes a kind of a prank call, a false accusation, and he gets a SWAT team. Well,

I thought that was perhaps interesting. Well, he now uses resources to stop these SWAT teams out there because they really have gotten out of hand. I've got a report here about a family, and I'll get to this in a moment after we take the break and we come back with politics, but it's about a family who went to January the 6th, and you will not believe what they did to them. They didn't do anything. But the swatting that happened against them, and again, it was just as illegitimate as somebody calling up

and making a false claim about somebody, except that this false claim is coming from the Biden administration and the Department of Justice. And it's horrific what they did to them. It is a practice that needs to be ended. Except that what we're going to see is as this police state, the surveillance state increases. Here's a good example of it.

This is from Just the News. Censorship concerns rise over state and local governments registering their domain names with sisa and we have to be concerned about this again the corruption from the federal government we have got to get people at the state and local level who are going to stand for the constitution individual liberty because the fish is rotting from the head down. And Washington is far too gone. This is, again, why people say, well, you don't like Trump, and you don't like Biden.

Well, who do you like? I don't like any of them, frankly. I don't trust any of them, and neither should you. You should never trust any person in politics. As a journalist, I'm not interested in endorsing anybody because that is an element of trust. And when you do that, you get burned. And rightfully so. You need to be skeptical.

You need to take a look at what they do. And when we look at CISA, it has now come under heightened scrutiny in recent years for targeting disinformation through its disinformation governance board. It works with big tech to shut down unpopular information about COVID or about wars or about any narrative that they've got going on. Trump of Alex's CIA source, Steve Pachinik, who was using that to kick off all this January the 6th stuff. Two days after the election, he talked about a sting. He said CISA was working with Trump to put blockchain watermarks on all the ballots and all these places. They knew who had cheated and they had already sent out 20,000 National Guard. And two days after election, he said, we've already had tons of people arrested.

All that was a lie. Every bit of it was a lie. But he incorporated CISA in there. Now, CISA was supposed to guard us against cyber attacks. But who guards the guardians? That's always been the question. James Madison put it. He says, well, because men are not angels, we need to have

government, but because government is going to be run by men, how do you protect against that? That's the age-old question of who guards the guardians. Once you put these people in power, they will use these tools that you gave them to protect us against us. They will become instruments of tyranny, not just in foreign wars, but against domestic wars, against tactics such as terrorism or cyber attacks. I think it's interesting, you know, there was this Japanese plane crash that happened. And when you look at this, I don't typically cover, you know, earthquakes and fires fires and you know the if it

bleeds it leads on most of the media stuff i'm not interested in that type of thing typically but there's a backstory to this and here's what it looks like you said explosion off in the distance and then you see a plane going that is on fire it completely incinerated this commercial jet that had 379 people on board. And yet, nobody died on that. But the plane, the reason that there was that fiery crash was because there was a Japanese Coast Guard plane that was at the end of the runway. And it was getting ready to do some relief work or something about the earthquake that

had happened. But they were parked in the wrong work or something about the earthquake that had happened. But they were parked in the wrong place or something, and that was not picked up. And as that plane landed, it struck that. And so the big jetliner, which then was completely incinerated, everybody was able to get off. All the crew, all the passengers were able to get off. But everybody on board the Japanese Coast Guard plane died. The reason I bring that up is because we're talking about cybersecurity. And if you recall a few months ago, we had a situation, which was the first time since

9-11 that all planes were grounded in the United States, and it was about 12 hours. They said it was not a cyber attack. It was. I'm absolutely certain it was. Because there is a system, and it's relevant to this plane crash here. The NOTAM system is what we call it. And what it does is it sends out messages to planes if there is some obstruction on the airport or somebody's in the wrong place or if there's been some incident to give a heads up. Now, that might not have come into play with

this. They might have just been mispositioned and the air traffic controllers didn't understand it, but you do have the no TAM system to prevent something like that from happening. If somebody is all on the runway or something that you put that out and as a warning, that system was shut down. I think that system was shut down as a cyber attack. And the reason I think that system was shut down as a cyber attack. And the reason I think that system was shut down as a cyber attack is because after about 12 hours of planes being grounded, it came back online. And within an hour, you had the NOTAM system taken down in Canada as well. But without the NOTAM system, they stopped all the flights because they didn't want to have something like that Japanese plane fire there. And that's the issue behind so much of these cyber attacks.

They will attack an ancillary thing, just like with the colonial pipeline. They didn't take the pipeline down itself. What they did was they took down the financial and accounting system so they couldn't track who they were selling it to and that type of thing. Couldn't do accounting. So by taking down the accounting system, they stopped the flow and the biggest pipeline on the East coast, the colonial pipeline. This is the way cybersecurity works. It would be nice if we had some protection against that,

except that CISA is focused internally, increasingly in the same way that the NSA and the CIA are increasingly focused internally in the same way that the FBI is not focused on criminals but on citizens. That's what our government has become. Finally, as we see, starting with a Babylon B story, one with a Babylon B story in the news. The president of Harvard, Claudine Gay, gives a tearful resignation speech entitled, The Gettysburg Address. Supposedly fired for her plagiarism, she came back and accused them of being racist. She's being fired because she's black.

No, she's being fired for racism. She's being fired for her perceived anti-Semitism. The backers of Harvard, largely Jewish, did not like the line that she took about the Israel-Hamas war. And so they pulled back as donors did. And interestingly enough, they all discovered that she was a plagiarist. And they had another round of plagiarism. And so, as Babylon Beast says at publishing time, Harvard confirmed that they were already interviewing other communist black women to replace gay.

Except that they didn't replace her with a communist black woman. They replaced her with a Jewish guy. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. Unlike most revolutions, where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.

It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow, it will be something else. ¶¶ Liberty, it's your move. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, let's take a look at politics here. Let's take a look at the election. We have David Axelrod.

If you remember who David Axelrod was, he was a White House advisor, high-level advisor to Obama. He was also a high-level official, maybe the campaign manager. I can't remember his exact title, but he worked on the Obama campaign. He is a very savvy political operative. And he's now saying the same thing that James Carville, who was the savvy political operative of Bill Clinton, both of them, both of them have been talking about how the over-the-top legal moves that are being made against Trump, everybody sees it, everybody knows it. You know, the Democrats know it, Republicans know it. And it's galvanizing the Republicans and both David Axelrod and James Carville are saying, we're helping Trump. And of course, everybody knows that.

You don't think that the district attorneys know that? You don't think the Department of Justice and the Biden administration knows that? The question is, why are they doing that? Why are they helping Trump? David Axelrod is panicking over the Democrats tossing Trump off the ballot. He says, you're making him stronger. Here's what he had to say. David Axelrod is panicking over the Democrats tossing Trump off the belt.

He says you're making him stronger. Here's what he had to say. All of this is strengthening him in the Republican primary. We've run this experiment. You know, he's only gained since he started getting indicted. You know, what you thought might be kryptonite for him has turned out to be battery packs. And this is a big one for him. Presumably, the Supreme Court will deal with it fairly quickly. And I expect that they will leave him on the ballot. And yes, Brianna, I have very, very strong reservations about all of this. I do

think it would rip the country apart if he were actually prevented from running because tens of millions of people want to vote for him. I think if you're going to beat Donald Trump, you're going to probably have to do it at the polls. Yeah, you should do it with debates, which they don't want to have. So they're going to make this about personalities. And it's very much like what James Carville said about the pending impeachment or hearings about Joe Biden and his corruption James Carville said how do we get so lucky here that's going to make

us go sky high in popularity you know to paraphrase it he knows exactly it's going to get the it's going to do the same thing for Biden this is done for. And you notice that both of these things are continuing to rip the nation apart, polarizing it behind two men. There's no principles really involved here. This is the reality that we're looking at. Of course, you know, the corruption that's happening with Biden, that is a principle that needs to be looked at, but it should have been looked at for a long time.

And again, it's going to have the effect of polarizing. As he said, it'll rip the country apart, but that's what they want. That's why I said, why are they doing this? They all know this. The political advisors know it. Everybody knows it on both sides. I think that they want to have a civil war and Trump is going to be, well, they're going to do the tug of war over and maybe over Biden as well. Stop and think about

this. Look at how you have the, uh, the press is already saying, Oh, we're going to, uh, Republicans are taking, take back the Senate. They're building up expectations for Republican voters. If that doesn't happen, you know, we've already had the red wave that didn't happen. Why did that not happen? Personally, I think it was because of Trump and his connection and Trump and his endorsements, you know,

endorsing people like Dr. Oz, who was beaten even by Fetterman. Endorsing other celebrity candidates who have absolutely no principles. Empty suits, but they were loyal to him. And they looked good. And so when you look at this as we're coming up to this, they really are setting this up to tear the country apart.

And I said this after the 2020 elections. I said, if you want to talk about election corruption, I've been talking about voting machines. At that point in time, I'd been talking about it since 2014. Smartmatic is their origin in Venezuela, created by friends of Hugo Chavez to make sure that he won that election. And they had a long history of accusations of rigging elections throughout Mexico, Central America, Brazil, the Philippines, over and over again, these accusations have been made, but it's not limited to one company. This is a something that is going to make all elections vulnerable. And then Trump added the vote by mail to everybody the mail out election where they mailed out ballots in many cases multiple ballots mailed out to people they're

not talking about getting rid of that trump's not talking about getting rid of it he's saying we're going to do a better job of it i'm going to uh out cheat the other side with this vote by mail stuff so everybody looks at this and i i said from the very beginning as well, I said, well, if you want to talk about corruption, talk about ballot access. That's where it all begins is with ballot access. And now everybody's upset about the fact that Trump doesn't have ballot access. And they should be. But why is it only when it happens to Trump?

Why is canceling and censorship only an only when it happens to Trump? Why is canceling and censorship only an issue when it happens to Trump, as he ignored it in 2018, until he gets kicked off of Twitter? Nobody cares unless it is Trump, because we don't care about the principles and we don't care about other people. Look, you need to have an open ballot if you're going to have democratic elections. And if you don't have open ballots, and if you don't allow all the candidates that are on the ballot, even after they jump through extra hoops that the Republicans and Democrats don't have to jump through, if you don't allow them to debate, you don't have a democracy. You have a mockery of a democracy. Take a look at RFK Jr., for example. i don't support rfk jr but just take a look at the issues involved

here uh he is uh been cut out uh biden is not going to debate him just like trump is not going to debate his opponent so he said i'm going to run as an independent but he's not going to get on the ballot in very many states as a matter of fact, when he had James Carville on over the Christmas breaks and he's talking to a Bill Maurer, James Carville is saying, you better wake up. And he is a little bit stronger language about this. He said, look, we've got all these people on the Democrat side who are running, you know, you've got Joe Manchin and a Congressman who may be running as a no labels candidate. Uh, and you've got, and even mentioned,'ve got, and he even mentioned some minor candidates.

He didn't mention RFK Jr., who is a much bigger threat than Cornel West. But his problem is that he is not going to be on the ballot. And of course, when you look at the Democrat Party of Florida, they even kept to be on the ballot. And, of course, when you look at the Democrat Party of Florida, they even kept other Democrats off the ballot. The Democrat Party did. They're only going to have Biden on the ballot. That's how you start rigging these elections. You rig them from the debates, from the ballot access to the debates.

Then you rig them with polls. You push people. Say you elevate somebody like Trump, for example. It's done. He's won everything. We haven't even had the first primary yet, but he's won everything according to all the polls and according to all the press that's out there. So you manipulate people with the polls and then you manipulate them in terms of all the different things that can be done in terms of ballot custody, ballot reporting, of all the different things that can be done in terms of ballot custody, ballot reporting, and all the rest of this stuff.

And then you also have the vote by mail and the computer stuff. But getting back to David Axelrod, he said Trump wanted to set up a construct which says that they're coming after him because he's running for president and they're trying to prevent him from being president. He says, well, we've run this experiment. He's only gained popularity since he started getting indicted. What you thought might be kryptonite for him turned out to be battery packs, and this is a big one for him, being kicked off of ballots

and being kicked off just by a secretary of state in one place or in another place by a judge. So as this is all happening, and there's the two issues in Maine and Colorado, Vivek Ramaswamy is doubling down, saying, I'm going to withdraw my name from these ballots because he is angling at this point, you understand, for vice president. That's what he's really focused on. And also angling for vice president is South Dakota governor, Kristi Noem, who says, I'm heading to Iowa. I'm going to do whatever I can to help Trump get across the finish line.

Again, she's making an open move to be a vice presidential candidate, vice president, along with Trump to get on the ticket. She says that she and Trump really work well together. Oh, isn't that nice? Yeah, she's not even trying to hide it. You know, that's, again, this whole thing, house of cards stuff, Game of Thrones stuff. I just really hate this political maneuvering.

You see it a little bit with Fetterman. You know, Fetterman is starting to get to where he can talk again now. And he did an interview and he was saying, well, I was very scared about this. I thought I might lose my career. Your career? Politics is a career for you? How despicable, how anti-ican that these people think of themselves as careerist and that's true of all the politicians Republican and Democrat for

the most part you know they don't have a life outside of this stuff and this is the gravy train that they're on and they are social climbers you know the first time we had somebody that really fit that description in America was Abraham Lincoln all the rest of the people said well you know you'll stand for election other people nominate me. These people push themselves, self promoters, careerists, truly is a speaker, why we have the kind of government that we have. Uh, so she said, uh, on potentially serving as the 2024 running mate,

Christie Nome says, uh, we will talk about that when it's time to make a decision. Well, you know, Trump has, she works really well with Trump. They get along great, but he doesn't get along good with a lot of other people. As a matter of fact, in his Christmas message, he told Biden and a lot of other people to rot in hell. Merry Christmas. Such a nice guy, isn't he? We should all be supporting him, don't you think? All the Christians should be supporting him.

As a matter of fact, look at this headline. Trump rats warn we're running out of time to stop his return to the White House. I guess that's me. I opposed him. Well, I got fired. I'm glad that I got fired, actually. I'm proud of the fact that I stood up for people who were later victimized, as I predicted that they would be victimized.

But, you know, I said yesterday, all these people are going to be, it's going to be a difficult year for me because I'm going to double down on Trump. I'm going to double down on this guy because I don't want to see him return to office. How in the world could anybody who has any conservative principles or any Christian support this guy after what you have seen him do in office? After he shut down the churches? After he put out the jab and prepared all of that and paid for it all. As David Stockman pointed out, you know, he spent trillions of dollars on these corrupt welfare programs, stimulus check and the PPP and all the rest of this.

He's got a book coming out in a few weeks called Trump's War on Capitalism. That was one aspect of it, but it was much broader than that. It was a war on our individual liberties. It was a war on our very lives. The Trump shot, the Trump poison. But like I said, it's going to be a difficult year for me. I saw yesterday a comment that was by a listener, somebody who has been a supporter in the past. It says, David, with a humble heart and love of Christ for you, I sincerely hope the Lord touches you and sends his spirit of repentance. Forgive Trump and get set free from your root of bitterness. Well, first of all, Trump's not asking for forgiveness.

He's proud of what he's done. Does that give you a clue? Do you have the discernment to understand this is a man who is proud of his crimes against humanity and that he will easily repeat them? Of course, in a rhyming way, not exactly in the same way. But if he is capable of shutting down churches, why are you not pushing against him? Why are you telling me that I'm the problem? Frankly, I don't care if you listen. I don't care if you support this. I went against Alex over this January the 6th stuff and over this Trump shot stuff. He was my sole means of support.

Except I don't get my support from any person. God can provide for me. If you were to see somebody on a roof sniping at people, would you call me bitter if I warned people about it? What would you do? Are you going to call evil good? What do you think the Bible says about that? Christian, can you discern good from evil? Can you discern a killer? Trump has killed far more people than any sniper has ever done. And he is capable of doing it again. He killed the Constitution.

He killed our economy. He paid and bribed governors to do all of this stuff. Don't excuse any of that stuff. Don't remain silent. If you do, it's on you. I'm very comfortable with who I am, and I don't really care if anybody watches or supports this program. I answer to God, not to you, pal, so-called Christian. You don't have the discernment to understand what's going on with this guy. Let me give you an example of this. This was sent to me this morning by Mary Ellen Moore.

And it's an article that just came out. Another January the 6th story. This is what I was trying to warn people about. This is what Alex was setting up as a trap. I said, this is a grift. Stay away from it. It's a trap. You're being enticed into this. You're being lied into this. Alex is out there saying, we're going to keep Biden out by any means necessary. And so when I warn people about that, look, I'm not bitter because I got fired by Alex. This has been a real blessing. I'm very happy to be here and to not be in texas the climate

suits me everything about this is much better and i'm grateful to supporters and i'm grateful to god for making this happen but look whatever happened i didn't know any of that was going to happen i didn't even know the show was going to continue i hadn't planned on the show continuing but i'm not going to sit there and remain silent while he's telling people that the Trump shot is sugar juice, while he's supporting Trump, telling everybody that Trump is playing 40 chess with the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff. And while he's selling a fear campaign. And then at the end of the year, ripping off people as he sends them into danger on January the 6th. I'm not bitter. I'm not bitter,

but I'm not going to stop complaining about and warning people about Trump and about Alex, because they are still influencing people. They're like a sniper who continues to take shots at people and they're destroying people's lives. As Mary Ellen Moore points out, Liz Cullen is the one who did this story, responsible for a film, The Fall of Minneapolis, about the George Floyd stuff that happened there.

She lost her job with one of the networks there. She's married to Bob Kroll, who is or was the head of the police union, because she talked about the corruption of the George Floyd thing. But now she's talking about this particular family. Here's the headline from Liz Collin. Minnesota mom slams two-tiered justice system ahead of the family's J6 trial. Her husband and her sons are facing jail sentences.

And here's what happened. All three of her sons and her sons are facing jail sentences. And here's what happened. All three of her sons and her husband are preparing for February the 12th trial dates. The family makes up one third of the January 6th defendants from Minnesota. These are all her husband and three sons are all charged and face prison time. She said, I think this is something people really need to understand. People want to sweep it under the rug, but it is still going on. Do you hear that? It's still going on.

People are still going to jail for Trump. People are still dying from Trump's sugar water, Alex. While these people point you to Ray Epps, they're the ones responsible for this stuff. Westbury said she and her family stayed for former Trump's, former President Trump's entire speech from the Ellipse on January 6th, describing the massive crowds as unlike anything she had ever seen. She said, so when we get to the Capitol, there's no barriers. There was nothing set up that would have made us think that we could not be there. When we got there, my husband and my sons went ahead, and my son Jonah was recording in just the whole day because it was very exciting.

We'd never been to Washington, D.C., so he recorded and put it on his Snapchat. When we did go into the Capitol, the doors were open. Entrapment. Entrapment. Entrapment. But never forget that even though Biden is totally culpable for all this, the entrapment as well as the enticement, the entrapment happened under Trump. The enticement came from Trump to save America.

It came from Alex Jones. And there were no subsequent pardons either. Trump had a couple of weeks to pardon people. He decided not to do it. Why not? As a matter of fact, Roger Stone, if you remember, was so angry with Trump that he went off on camera in front of some filmmakers that were doing a documentary film on Roger. And I won't repeat the language, but he swore up one side and down the other that he would oppose Trump for everything.

And now look at what Roger is doing. One of his biggest fans out there. Because that's the path to fame, fortune, and followers. Is to get on the Trump bandwagon. So the doors were open. We were just like tourists. She said it was actually one of his classmates, a high school classmate, that called the FBI and said,

oh, I see somebody that was in the Capitol, a former classmate of mine. So that's how this all got started, she said. She said two of her sons helped her husband to a bench inside the Capitol after he was pepper sprayed. And we see from some of the videos now that that was initiated by the police. They initiated the force. She said Isaac and Aaron went in to help Rosalyn Boylan, a Trump supporter who died that day.

We didn't know who it was at first. Aaron said to my son, Isaac, we've got to go help because they were doing cpr and we could see that they went to the front of the tunnel the infamous tunnel and they tried to get to rosanne to help but they were unable to the police were spraying this very toxic yellow gas from what i'm told it sucks the oxygen out of the air so they realized they could not get to rosanne so aaron Aaron told Isaac, let's pick up shields. And they were holding shields on the ground so that she wouldn't get sprayed. They are the ones who have felony charges for doing that, she said. Isaac and Aaron are facing

up to 20 years in prison. Her husband, Bob, and son Jonah face up to two years in prison. Jonah Westbury was 25 years old in 2021. He is fighting a slew of charges, including entering and remaining in a restricted building and grounds, disorderly disruptive conduct in a restricted building and grounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a Capitol building and grounds and parading and demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building. Let me just say this. You know, when you look at what's going on with Infowars, and you look at the martyrdom

of, supposedly martyrdom of Owen Schroer, he went to jail for 60 days, less than 60 days. They let him out early. Because he was demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building. He disrupted a hearing that was there. Now I understand that they gave him a suspended sentence and then they came after him again.

And probably it was all because of the January 6th of it. Think about how light he got off and think about his role in enticing people into January the 6th. He's not a victim. He skirted this stuff, and Alex has skirted everything about this stuff. Isaac Westbury is 18 years old, disorderly conduct in a Capitol building, and an act of physical violence in the Capitol ground building because he was holding a shield.

Aaron James is a U.S. Navy veteran who served three tours in Iraq and Afghanistan faces the same charges as Isaac. He says, the reason that I went, she said, I felt like I had to go. It was a compulsion within me. Was it for president Trump?

Well, I suppose it was because you had people like saying, by any means, we're going to make sure that Joe Biden does not become president. So what happened to them before these indictments? Two no-knock raids were carried out by the FBI. It first happened in April of 2021.

I was talking earlier about Soros getting swatted. Well, this is an illegitimate swatting of these people who committed no violent crime. They come in combat. Again, Joe Biggs, 17 years. No violence. Believe me, they went through and they highlighted him for the J6 committee.

There's Joe Biggs. darken everything out, but highlight on him on the video. If he had done anything violent, you know, they would have highlighted that. She said they came in with a SWAT team. They came in combat style. They had AR-15s. Everybody has to get out. They said they dragged the men to the front of the house. They put Jonah in shackles and leg irons and ankle irons. They dragged him out and put him

in the back of a vehicle and brought him down for processing. He was in a holding cell for hours and hours and hours with leg irons on. He was inside of a cage with leg irons. You see, when we talk about, and I mentioned 1984, Terry Gilliam, kind of black satire about 1984 that he called Brazil. And it begins with this type of thing. Except even then, in 1984, what Terry Gilliam put in Brazil was so over the top. I'll never forget seeing it for the first time. And yet, we are beyond his exaggerated satire of a police state. The beginning of Brazil. Movie about a totalitarian society.

Can't hold a candle to this. They came in, she said, with 50 to 60 agents. and a SWAT team. And they had drones that went through my chicken coop and into the house. I don't know what they were looking for, but they dragged Aaron and Bob and Isaac down to be processed. They didn't allow them to even get shoes on. They didn't allow them to get really anything. They were in their stocking feet, barefoot. They brought them down to be processed, put them in leg irons. She said the raids traumatized her neighbors,

who would always refer to her as the Christmas cookie lady. They call me the Christmas cookie lady because I make Christmas cookies for everybody every year. And they're wondering, what is going on at the Christmas cookie lady's house? She said there was no reason for it. They took all of our firearms all of my electronics i haven't been charged as of yet but everything in my house the phones the cell phones the old cell phones computers everything they took everything they had us get rid of replica guns, cap guns, cap guns. She said, my family did nothing wrong.

If they take a deal, what are they pleading to? Are they agreeing that they're guilty of what? Of whatever the government says that they're guilty of? So they're standing up for what's right, what's good, what's holy, what's true? After rioting in Minneapolis, the U.S. Attorney's Office charged 17 people with federal riot and arson. Just four people who were responsible for destroying the Minneapolis Police Department's 3rd Precinct building faced charges.

And the longest sentence of those has been four years in that case. So compare and contrast this to what happened in Minnesota over the George Floyd thing. Is that, again, going back to the mother, we have people who are nonviolent at the Capitol and they're being charged and they're being put in prison for 20 years, 18 years. It is a two-tiered justice system. It's not justice, not justice at all. And it makes me think, where has our country gone? And there's a fundraiser for this family to help them with their legal expenses. And so I want to go back to this and say, forgive Trump.

You forgive Trump. This is still going on. Every week we get more reports of people who have been sacrificed for his ego and his finances, and he's still doing it. And he's on the cusp of becoming president again. I will oppose that. And don't you push back on me on this stuff. Just go somewhere else.

Go listen to Alex, because I've been banned and canceled for speaking the truth so much that I don't have any patience for you or anybody else. Narrow gate ministries. Go somewhere else. If you can't handle the truth about Trump, because I'm going to lay it on and I don't care what the consequences are here. If you don't warn somebody when you see something happening, my conscience is clear. I tried to warn people away from January the 6th.

I said this kind of stuff was going to happen. Why don't you get angry about what is being done to innocent people? Why do you push back on me against the person who did it to them? The criminals who did it to them, who enticed them, who entrapped them, who robbed them of their money. Why don't you talk about that? You want to pray for Trump? Pray for Trump. You know, you're told to pray for Trump. You're told to pray for those in power.

Pray that Trump becomes a Christian. Instead, Trump has surrounded himself with false prophets, false Christians, like this so-called pastor and self-anointed prophet, Julie Green. My children, the time has come. A time that you have been waiting for. A reinstatement. A shift of power.

A new government in control. An overthrow and a takeover in this nation from the hands of the wicked to the hands of the righteous to the hands of the righteous. There's not anybody righteous, especially her. Come, the time is drawing near. A coup is about to be disrupted and annihilated and everyone a part of it exposed and removed. So my children, hold on. 2024 will start out with a bang so brace for a mighty impact

coming to shake you loose from the chains that bind you it will look worse but remember my words this means your enemy's days are running out. Yeah. So there they go. This is the woman who said, there's so many false prophets who call themselves Christians. How many times do you have to lie to somebody about what's going to happen

before you become a false prophet? Just once. And we've had these people who over and over again have said, no, Trump was the winner. Trump is going to be reinstalled. He's going to not leave office. Oh, he's now he's going to come back in March or in April or something like that. Continuing this, Julie Green has been that way from the very beginning and continues that way. false Christians like Michael Flynn, who goes to Christian buildings,

they call them churches, and holds his reawakened tours, and has people there, the sheep there, reciting a prayer from Elizabeth Clare Prophet, this cult leader from the 1980s, plagiarizing it word for word. I've played that a couple of times. Plagiarizing it word for word. I've played that a couple of times, plagiarizing it word for word.

And then he has Julie Green on and he has Eric Trump and Julie Green on together or Donald Trump Jr. and Julie Green on together. Folks, this is a false Christianity. It is, these are false prophets. They're liars. They're deceivers. They're thieves.

They're criminals. Why would anybody not be bitter about this? Let me tell you what the appropriate way to do this is, Narrowgate, Narrow Ministries. You ought to get the equivalent of some cords and beat these son of a guns out of the public square like jesus did you ought to get angry about this kind of stuff uh infant son of a january the 6th defendant placed on the quiet skies suspected terrorist list so yeah you tell me who is the rat in all of this stuff there's no excuse for Biden. But Biden and Trump have been a tag team on both January the 6th and on the vaccines.

They're a tag team. An eight-week-old infant has placed on a secretive terrorist watch list known as Quiet Skies last week, according to A.J. Fisher. The only suspected but not so reasonable explanation for this designation is that Fisher is a January the 6th defendant and the infant's father. Most alarmingly, it was not even Fisher who booked the ticket for his child. Fisher's fiancee booked the ticket for herself and the infant, but neither was anywhere close to D.C. on January the 6th. They booked separately, weeks apart from Fisher, because he is still awaiting court approval for travel due to his ongoing case with the Department of Justice. Fisher's fiance or their infant son travels, their boarding passes are stamped SSSS to indicate that they are suspected domestic terrorists. The infant son. You see, Trump set them up. Trump set them up.

And Alex set them up for this. Unbelievable. Nancy Mace, who is a congresswoman from South Carolina, she went on to Fox News and said, we're losing the fight on abortion every single day. No, they have not tried to fight abortion and failed. They have failed to even try to fight abortion. Nancy Mace says, oh, I'm pro-life, but we're losing this fight.

And if you want to be serious about reducing the number of abortions in this country, we have to have a conversation on how women can have greater access to birth control and abortions at other times, right? Now, if you want to be serious about this, I have covered the pro-life progressive Democrat who is running for Congress simply because, as a federal candidate, they cannot censor her pictures to show what abortion is. In Washington, D.C., she and other activists discovered a great number of aborted babies' bodies, and they took pictures of them.

And she is using her candidacy for Congress to show those pictures because the networks cannot refuse to show that. That is the truth of abortion that Nancy Mace and these other Republicans don't want to go near. Don't want to go near it. And, you know, as somebody who is running for Congress, Nancy Mace is uniquely positioned to be able to show the truth. If I had the money to buy those, they wouldn't run those ads. Only if you're running for Congress. And that's why this progressive leftist who is pro-life is running these commercials.

But no so-called pro-life Republicans will do that. Never have done that. This is not an opposition to abortion. They have never opposed it because they have never shown it for the crime that it truly is. We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we'll talk about Nikki Haley and Joe Biden. So we'll be right back. Stay with us. ¶¶ Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass,

APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. Well, Nikki Haley, and this is a good article. I appreciate this. This is from usnatural born citizen.com and they're onto her game and she's not unique. We've had so many presidential candidates again. So why would we be surprised that people running for presidency don't care about the constitution? That was one of Trump's defenses in this colorado case well you know he

didn't swear an oath to the constitution and he didn't you know the office of the president is not a you know not anything that's on the constitution or whatever it's like well actually he's telling the truth you know the constitution is a dead letter to these people time to wake up that's what his lawyers say just like alex's lawyers said he's an actor he's an entertainer that's right and trump is not subject to the constitution that's right his lawyers told you the truth trump won't tell you the truth that they will nikki haley is not subject to the constitution either because um she is uh not born on American soil to American citizens. As per the Immigration Nationality Act of 1952,

it clearly states, one has to be a resident on file for a five-year waiting period before obtaining a naturalization status. She was born before that period of time was completed with her parents who moved to America from India. Therefore, she was born to parents who were not citizens at the time. Prior to the 14th Amendment, this was the rule of law. of 1830 and in Elk versus Wilkins of 1884 ruled that a child born on U.S. soil of a father who owes allegiance to sovereignty other than the United States is not a U.S. citizen at birth, and that the citizenship of such a child is that of its father and not of its place of birth. Nikki Haley would have been classified as a foreigner

under these court decisions of 1830 and 1885. And then when you look at the 14th Amendment, I believe it came between those two. It came right after the Civil War. I don't have the date of the 14th Amendment here, but I believe it came between those two Supreme Court decisions. And what did it say? Well, it made it very clear that you have to be subject to the jurisdiction and citizens of the United States in order to be made a citizen.

Why did that come up in the 14th Amendment? Because the 14th Amendment, the purpose of the 14th Amendment was to say that freed slaves had full rights of citizenship. They had been born in the United States to parents who were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. And so that's why it uses that phrase there. there but they made a distinction about someone who was a let's say an ambassador who is here legally not even an illegal alien but an ambassador who is here legally and if they have children those children are not american citizens they have just you know that is not what the majority opinion is right now, but that is what the law states. And so when we look at this, it's not just Nikki Haley. It's also Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Obama, if his father was really Obama. But if his father was that communist organizer, you know, was it dreams from my

real father, Joel Gilbert had, if his father was really the communist organizer, then he would be a natural, he would be an American citizen. But again, looking at some housekeeping issues here, another listener was upset about the fact that in California, there was a statement. She sent me a statement and said, what are they doing to Republicans here? Well, it wasn't the Republican Party that, the Democrat Party, and the Libertarian Party, allow people who have no party preference to vote in their primaries. But that's a decision that's made by the parties because the parties have so much control over all of this. But the Green Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, and the Republican presidential primaries are only open to voters who are registered with that party. And so again, when we look at this, we need to understand what the games are being played

with the ballot and how much power the parties have in terms of connecting that. Um, crossover voting is, um, what they're talking about. The Republicans don't want Democrats voting in their primary, so they don't allow that. But of course, uh, you could say the crossover voting is happening with the district attorneys and the department of justice that are making heroes out of. And then Biden, what is biden doing well again uh he has joe biden picked up these dogs and we see this happen all the time from presidential candidates they've never had a dog but then they uh they get elected president and they get a dog because it somehow humanizes them, I guess, for them to have a dog.

And, uh, so he adopted, um, you know, let's go, let's be really politically correct. Instead of getting a puppy or something, I'll get a dog that has been abandoned by the people because they've got

biting issues or something like that. And, uh, rather than having somebody train it, me, I just lets it run loose because it's all just about a photo op. And now his second dog is also accused of biting many people. I guess when he goes to the vet, you know, you go to the vet and they give you the, they put your last name there behind the dog.

And so, you know, we take a scout to the vet. He's Scout Knight. Well, this is Commander. That's the name they gave this dog. And so, you know, we take a scout to the vet he's scout night. Well, this is commander. That's the name they gave this dog. And I guess when he goes to the vet, he is commander biting, because he's biting everybody. Uh, and that's an appropriate, uh, identification for both the dog and his owner.

Uh, but then, you know, when you look at Joe Biden, he's been on vacation quite a bit. So maybe he doesn't accompany the dog to the vet. You think I'm sure he does it. Uh, 37% of 2023 was a Joe Biden on vacation. Uh, he says that, um, he's working as he's sitting there under the umbrella, but I don't think so. And then 2023, he says his favorite memory of 2023 is the economy's improvement. This is a guy who can't remember what his favorite food is. Remember, he had just recently had to have his wife remind him that he likes ice cream. And so Biden says on New Year's Eve that his favorite memory of 2023 was the improvement of the U.S. economy.

I don't think we can trust his memory. This guy is truly our first AI president, isn't he? The artificial incumbent. Yeah, that's exactly what this guy is. We'll be right back. Looking for better information? APSradioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.

APSradioNews.com Thank you. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. And the only thing that got me out of that space was a comedian friend of mine, the late, great Norm MacDonald. That's right. Shout out to Norm. And what Norm did, which I'll never forget, is he knew that I was the biggest Jim Carrey fan in the world. Now, I'm not going to go all into it, but Jim Carrey is talented in a way that you can't practice or rehearse.

What a God-given talent. I was fascinated with him. And Norm knew that. And he called me up and he goes, Dave, he says, I'm doing a movie with Jim Carey. Do you want to meet him? It was the first time I could remember since my father died being excited.

And the movie was called Man on the Moon. I didn't know any of this. And in this movie, Jim Carey was playing another comedian I admired, the late, great Andy Kaufman. Yes, and Jim Carrey was so immersed in that role that from the moment he woke up to the time he went to bed at night, he would live his life as Andy Kaufman.

I didn't know that. When they said cut, this was still Andy Kaufman. So much so that everybody on the crew called him Andy. I didn't know any of that. I just went there to meet him. And when he walked into the room where we were supposed to meet, I screamed, Jim Carrey. And everyone said, no. Call him Andy.

And I didn't understand. And then he came over and he was acting weird. I didn't know he was acting like Andy Kaufman. He's just like, hey, how you doing? And I was like, hello. Andy? Now, in hindsight, how lucky am I that I got to see one of the greatest artists of my time immersed in one of his most challenging processes ever. I'm very lucky to have seen that.

But as it was happening, I was very disappointed. Because I wanted to meet Jim Carrey, and I had to pretend this was Andy Kaufman all afternoon and he was clearly Jim Carrey I could look at him and I could see he was Jim Carrey anyway I say all that to say that's how trans about some of the profanity i forgot to beep out of that but uh that's it's quite a punch line that he had there and very true as a matter of fact, this Zero Hedge article says, activists are now furious at Dave Chappelle because he explains transgenderism. You're not Andy Kaufman. You're not a woman either.

All it takes is one person to point out reality and break the collectively enabled delusion. And that's what I think he did a great job of doing. They say on this article is a zero hedge article. The trans movement exists in this kind of bubble, a place where objective truth is no longer welcome and cognitive dissonance is encouraged for the sake of comfort. Much like any oppressive environment, the more people self censor to avoid rocking the boat, the harder it is for individuals to speak their minds. This is how consent is manufactured, by creating the illusion of consensus. And so, you know, certain things you're not allowed to say. Certain people will, you know, punish you for that. You don't want to oppose the agenda of the pharmaceutical companies, of the military industrial complex, or the World Economic Forum.

You don't want to oppose the agenda of the LGBT, or they will punish you for that. You don't want to, in Republican circles, say anything about Trump. Chappelle is back with another Netflix special special it's called the dreamer and as one person says hey you know lighten up this is a comedy everybody gets mocked and that's why it's funny no one is too special to be made fun of well that's what real comedy is about right ricky jervis who also released a special of the christmas period was attacked again for not towing the woke line the only thing more popular on netflix right now uh than dave chappelle and he posted this and he said hey we should get together and host the oscars together i don't think that's going to happen anytime soon but take a look at what is happening even in churches

the methodist church in the uk says that we should have more inclusive language which means that the methodist church is saying we got to get rid of husband wife brother, because those are hurtful things. Hurtful things. Replace them by what, you might ask? Well, you replace that with a parent or partner or child or carer, but not mother and father. And, of course, you know, we've had liberal elements within the Catholic Church. We've got to get rid of our father. It's too sexist and all the rest of this stuff.

And so what about, you know, we want to honor these people, they say. Using a person's chosen pronouns is helpful as it honors their identity. Well, what about honoring God? What about honoring the reality of his creation and how he created us? No, that's not anything we want to do in California. You've got schools are forcing kids to watch movies about transgenderism, and they use these things as commercials for puberty blockers. California school district that has more than 19,000 students. Get your kids out of schools because this isn't something that just happens in California.

It's everywhere. It's everywhere. So they've got a lesson plan. It centers around a 12-year-old girl. They give this to fifth graders who are at that age, right? 11 to 12. So a 12-year-old girl, unsure of her gender identity. The film promotes the use of puberty blockers to give her more time to decide.

This school district has also pledged $40 million. They pledged in 2021 $40 million to develop and implement an ethnic studies curriculum. They spent over $90,000 on a, quote, liberated ethnic studies curriculum, unquote, which was coming from an organization that pushes critical race theory. They also spent $57,000 at an organization called Woke Kindergarten. They're teaching critical race theory in kindergarten that is aimed to, quote, disrupt whiteness. They're teaching hardcore racism to kids in kindergarten. What do you think our society is going to be like? They're going to get their race war. They're working real hard on it, and they're using our money,

and they're using your money and they're using your children. If you're putting them in school, another $23,000 with the Quetzal education services, an organization that teaches anti-racist math. Well, math doesn't have race in it unless you put it in. Now math is completely free of of race we look at what is

happening in ohio governor dewein there a republican and again over the um over the holidays uh he vetoed a bill that was set up to protect kids from being mutilated chemically surgically and uh so um jack windsor is a journalist out of ohio and uh in this interview where they talked to him about this this is he was interviewed by a tennessee star uh he talks about the deep ties between DeWine and the medical industrial complex. And by that, he means both the hospitals as well as big pharma. He works for the Ohio Press Network as a journalist. And he said, you know, this goes back, the guy who was interviewing him at the Tennessee Star said,

you know, you were probably the most disliked journalist there during the lockdowns and stuff like that, that this Republican governor was doing, DeWine. He said, yeah, I guess if they were handed out those kinds of awards to the press, I would win that award, hands down. The guy said, you would ask him questions that he couldn't answer about COVID lockdowns and all the phony elements of the COVID report that they had in Ohio. He says, yeah, we were just talking about the data, right? If the masks don't work, why aren't they working?

He said, that's just what we were talking about. We weren't talking about any conspiracies or anything like that. We were just asking, you know, what's the matter with the mask and why isn't that stuff working? He says, are we looking at the long-term impact of these covid policies you know these are the kind of questions frankly that need to be asked of vivek ramaswamy because as we look at governor dewan and we look at what he did during not just, you know, what he's doing now by vetoing this legislation to protect children from so-called doctors that want to mutilate them. We go back and look at, you know, it is a continuum going back to the so-called pandemic.

And it was Vivek Ramaswamy who was on DeWine's team. That's damning enough to oppose Ramaswamy right there. So anyway, he says at one point he was out of answers because there's no correlation between what he was doing and what was really going on with the virus. So instead of saying, you know what, we may have gotten this wrong. They just kick people out who ask those hard questions. So we see that everywhere.

Have you heard Trump said he got the vaccine wrong? No, no, he doubles down on it. He's, you know, he push him on it and he pushes back and tells you that he saved 200 million people or something. Some nonsense that he just makes up. They will not admit even to doing wrong, which tells you that they're not going to stop doing wrong. He says it would have, this bill that was vetoed by DeWine would have outlawed puberty blockers,

cross sex hormones, and what we call gender mutilation surgeries. It would have made it illegal for males to compete in girls' sports and also invade their privacy in places like locker rooms. He said, many people on the Republican side of the aisle, and I would even dare say one of DeWine's former advisors, contacted me a day before DeWine vetoed the bill and said, what's going on? This is a layup, he said.

Why is this taking him so long to make a decision about this? Well, we'd been investigating and I unpacked some of the information that we had gathered. And I said, look, he's going to veto this. And here's why I think he's going to do it. Do you remember Krist christy gnome christy gnome who is traveling to iowa because she's a great fit for trump and she really is you know have neither of them have any principles right trump is saying any protection against abortion is too harsh and on and on uh pushed gun control by executive order set that precedent all these other things christine ohm when a bill

was presented to her she vetoed it as well that bill was about sports men and women's sports and she vetoed that so she's a good fit for him uh so again he says uh jack windsor the journalist from ohio says his former advisor said in her opinion, said, look, he's just old. DeWine he's out of touch. He really just doesn't understand. This is an issue. He thinks it's really not an issue. And Jack Windsor said,

no, I don't buy that. He came out and said that his reasoning was that he'd had parents who told him that if it wasn't for these treatments, their child would be dead. Yeah, right. He says he's owned by the big drug companies.

And they're driving this kind of activism. He's beholden to the medical industrial complex. Just as he was during the lockdowns. Just as he was during the, here, you take the jab and I'll enter you in a lottery to possibly win a million dollars. Where did DeWine get that money? Well, Trump had just helicoptered in tons, billions of dollars, tens of billions of dollars, to all these governors to do exactly that type of thing. But DeWine took the lead on that.

And that's another thing that Ramaswamy needs to answer for. He was on his team what did you say about that what did he have to do with that so anyway um uh daily caller did some research and found that dewine received forty thousand dollars from children's hospitals who support sex change procedures. Now, why don't the Republicans impeach him? As I said before, you know, we should impeach Biden for crimes of corruption like that. But, you know, in this environment and in this time, it's going to be perceived as just tit for tat.

It'll be dismissed by the Democrats. They don't care about the corruption. I mean, they don't care about the corruption from New Jersey Senator Menendez. He's been up multiple times about corruption, and now they're coming after him again. Lindsey Graham, by the way, testified as a character witness for Menendez in his previous corruption trial. Because, you know, you always want to have Lindsey Graham as a character witness. No, they're on the same team when it comes to the military industrial complex. Well, you know, DeWine is on the same team as the medical industrial complex and their medical martial law.

So he's paid off by them, gave him $40,000. Look, it doesn't matter whether they gave him $40 million or $40,000 or $40. He's on their payroll. He took a bribe. It's just that simple. Of course, the Democrats are not going to indict him for that because they're all about the trans agenda. And the Republicans won't do it because he's part of their party. He says this is a $5 billion industry nationwide.

He says, I've talked with representatives of the Senate president. They seem to think they've got the votes to override DeWine's veto. They seem to be 100% willing and able to consider this and to provide enough votes for a veto override. So he said the final nail in the coffin for me, uh, to know that DeWine was going to veto this bill was the night before Lieutenant governor of Ohio, John Houston or Husted.

I don't know how you pronounce his name said on Twitter. He said, not verbatim, but essentially he said, Hey, I believe this should be law. I hope that goes into law. He said, so you could see him unhitching his wagon from DeWine.

This lieutenant governor in Ohio has got a problem. He didn't unhitch, says journalist Jack Windsor. He didn't unhitch his wagon from DeWine during COVID. Neither did Ramaswamy. DeWine was really lucky, and so was the lieutenant governor, that the primary was far enough after the midst of how they handled COVID that he didn't lose. If they would have had the primary in the middle of that crisis,

DeWine would have lost. But then there's this. Who was it that gave him the money for what he did with covid that both the wine and the lieutenant governor doubled down on well it was trump who is now saying now distancing himself from the guy that he gave the money to to be a covid dictator trump says i'm finished with this stiff meaning dewine the trump is hypocrite in chief trump is somebody who not only funded dewine's medical martial law and the million dollar lotteries to take the jab and all the rest of this stuff but um he is also a pioneer in all this transgender stuff, pushing men to get into women's beauty contests when he had Miss Universe.

He was open to it. He was bragging about it. He was supporting it. But see, this is all for Trump. This is just a popularity contest. He says, you know, whenever I do an event with DeW the wine he gets loudly booed every time i introduce him at the rally so i'm done with this stuff because this is nothing other than trump's own perceived self-interest that's what it's always about so he's the person who pushed

the transgenders into beauty contests and winning all that stuff. But, you know, this bill was vetoed by DeWine. And now Trump is done with this guy because it prohibits biological males from competing in women's sports. Doesn't say anything about beauty contests, though. And again, the person who wound up owning Miss Universe today had a whole bunch of men in that beauty contest. And it's not just the beauty cont contest and the sports, other sports. USA Boxing is now going to allow transgenders to fight women beginning this year.

Trump should be proud. He should be proud. This is what he was talking about a long time ago. World Boxing Council President Mauricio Suleiman told the Telegraph that he's not happy with the ruling that his organization has sought to create a unique division strictly for transgender athletes. This is a different, this is a World Boxing Council, whereas the U.S. Boxing Organization, that's the name of it, U.S. Boxing, they're going to allow it. But the World Boxing Council guy said, In boxing, a man fighting a woman must never be accepted, regardless of gender change. There should be no gray area around this, and we want to go into it with transparency and correct decisions. Woman to man or man to woman,

transgender change will never be allowed to fight a different gender by birth. You don't change your gender. You can change your mind about what you think you are, but there is no changing your gender. So, you know, maybe we could still have professional wrestling opened up to women i don't know that's where donald trump hangs out because he really is the master of professional wrestling whether we're talking about the actual theatrical stuff or the professional wrestling of politics we'll be right back whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.

Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we were talking about the Methodist Church in the UK. Maybe it's in the US as well where they were changing the terms that they're going to refer to people. Don't call them husband and wife. Don't call them mother and father. These are offensive things. We should run away from them. Calvin Robinson had a sub stack talking about this, the Methodist church branding husband and wife as offensive. You know, it was years ago, James Dobson, who did, had focus on the family, said about the Methodist church, he said, you know, when they started embracing all this LGBT stuff,

he said, when I was growing up, he said the difference between the Baptist and Methodist was that the Baptist didn't think that you could lose your salvation and the Methodist did. But now he said, you know, they've completely gone off track. You know, the reality is the Methodists have lost the plot altogether. Not just understanding what it takes to be saved. They've lost the entire plot because they've lost the Bible. They no longer care.

What they do is they bring the zeitgeist of society into their church. So as Calvin Robinson said, he said, you know, you ban these terms because they said it conveys an assumption that is not the reality for many people. Well, it determines reality. What is the objective truth, especially for somebody who claims to be a Christian? He said, living in grace is not a reality for many people, so should we avoid using the word grace? He says, it's difficult to get one's head around the idea that ministers should stop using particular words in case a minority of people find them to be offensive. The question has to be asked, so what?

So what if they find it offensive? Does not know that these people not know that the gospel, which is good news, is an offense to most people? There are many people who find the Bible offensive, so should we throw it out altogether? Of course not. But so is the idea of no longer using regular English terms like husband and wife, which have clear and unoffensive meanings. There's nothing inclusive about excluding the traditional use of the English language. Or, for that matter, rejecting the institutions that were created by God, the family.

First institution. Where is all this coming from? He says, well, the manipulation of our language is coming not from Christianity, but from Marxism. Critical race theory and critical theories are a contemporary take on Marxism. The neo-Marxism is an amended, extended, and adapted form of Marxism for the 21st century. He says Marxism forces the overriding or the replacing of what is appropriate or acceptable. They do this with everything. It's just like tearing down statues,

historical statues. Everything must be erased and altered. He says liberals would say that disordered lifestyles are equal to ordered lifestyles, but Marxists would go a step further. They say that disorder must replace order, because that's how they come to power. Let me just parenthetically put in here, you know, as we look at the press and how they focus on whenever they can find somebody who is, you know, identifies as a Christian or as a pastor or as a priest or whatever. And they're involved in some kind of a sexual crime or violence or anger.

And here's an example of this. You got a pastor in North Carolina whose wife was working at McDonald's and she called him up. She said she was being disrespected by the cook, and so this guy goes to McDonald's. He grabs a guy by the throat, and he tries to push him into the deep fryer. And the only reason I'm covering this, and the police came and arrested him.

They got the camera footage, surveillance footage, showing exactly what happened. The only reason I'm covering. They got the camera footage, surveillance footage, showing exactly what happened. The only reason I'm covering it is because of this great headline from Zero Hedge talking about it. They call it Baptism by Friar. I thought that was hilarious. But anyway, it is a shame that we have, whenever something like that happens, they will hold us to those standards.

They won't hold themselves to those standards. When we look at what happened in Iowa with the satanic display there, John Harris says the Founding Fathers are now meeting the pluralist Satanists. In December of 2023, fault lines emerged within the ranks of both conservatives and evangelicals after a Navy pilot destroyed a Baphomet statue depicting Satan in the Iowa State Capitol. Now, I've talked about this and I've said, you know,

the bottom line is that these Satanists are not exercising religious liberty because they don't have a religion. What they're doing is they're anti-free speech. They're anti-free exercise of religion. They're anti-God.

They're anti-Christ. They don't believe any of this stuff, and they want to purge all of it. It is kind of a Marxist issue here, very much like that, trying to purge things. They don't have a religion that they believe. They are anti-religion, anti-Christ, all the rest of this stuff. But I also said, you know, I agree with this guy

essentially knocking it down. I'm fine with that. But what is interesting is the fact that you've got people like John Dunwell, who's a Christian Missionary Alliance pastor, and a representative in the state of Iowa, elected representative. One of the first to publicly use a logic of religious neutrality to support the statue's presence. I don't think that we're called to be silent. I don't think we're called to be neutral.

He said he didn't want the state evaluating and making determinations about religions. Well, neither do I. But this is not a religion, and nobody is questioning the Satanist religion. Nobody's asking, well, what do you really believe? Do you really believe it? They are openly saying they don't believe any of this stuff.

They're openly saying that they're doing this in order to shut down any free exercise of religion that's what they're doing so it's not uh it's not like you're setting up some kind of an inquisition as they did to soldiers in the military do you really have a religious objection to this vaccine well explain this to me and then trying to trick them and trap them up see you're taking this other stuff over here and they used a test for it. No, it's not any of that kind of stuff. These people are openly telling you. They don't believe what they say their religion is.

And they're openly telling you that they're against you having free speech, you having free exercise. And then you had a Presbyterian pastor, Scott Clark, who said Christians should not engage in iconoclasm. In other words, tearing down icons. And he reasoned that since the Iowa state Capitol is a secular building, no religious displays of any kind should be present there, including nativity scenes. He doesn't understand at all. He is a guy who is a pastor. He doesn't understand either Christianity, and he doesn't understand the principles of establishment versus exercise, as I've always said. So there is no neutral position, right? When you come to preferred pronouns, you come to drag queens, and you come to mutilation by chemicals and surgery. Is there a neutral position right when you come to preferred pronouns you come to drag queens when you come to mutilation by chemicals and surgery is there a neutral position in there no there isn't

uh so the satanic temple essentially exploits america's tradition of religious toleration in order to destroy that religious toleration. So why do we play that game with them? So that's my first take on it. Jenna Ellis, who represented Trump and then tearfully repented of all that, Jenna Ellis has now weighed in on this. She says, we don't want to create a theocracy that doesn't allow religious freedom. They point out in this sub-stack, in 1787, when the federal constitution was ratified, nine state constitutions included Christian religious test requirements for officeholders, including adherence to doctrines such as the Trinity and the inspiration of Scripture.

The four remaining states were governed by explicitly Christian royal charters or constitutions. New York, one of the states that did not have a religious test, said in their constitution of 1777 that, quote, free exercise of worship and liberty of conscience shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness.

Not only did all 13 states recognize God, but they exclusively preferred Christianity. In 1786, the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom that Jefferson was so proud of, that's what he wanted on his tombstone, not the Declaration of Independence, but the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, that statute's immediate impact was to foster a greater peace between competing Christian denominations by ending compelled worship. And so that's what establishment is. And that's the difference between the establishment of religion and the free exercise of religion.

And that is government compulsion. They would compel people to go to a particular church or compel people to pay for a church. None of that is involved. And that was always the case. As a matter of fact, into the 1840 something, you had Massachusetts still had a, uh, a state church. And of course that's long after the constitution was ratified and, uh, 87.

And after the bill of rights in 1789 they still had an established state church i don't agree with that but the first amendment doesn't even prohibit a state established church first amendment prohibits the congress from establishing that because all the states had established those but again the the issue here is compelling people versus allowing them to freely exercise in the public square what they believe. And that is what came in the middle of the 20th century with the Supreme Court. And that is what the Satanists are busy trying to do. But as we see in school district after school district, and here's another article about their after-school Satan club in a Kansas school. Let me just say this.

Isn't the school itself a club, a Satanist club? You know, they teach the kid, they give them pornography, they teach them they're in the wrong body, they teach them to hate people because of the color of their skin. Isn't that a school of Satan? And isn't the Iowa State Capitol building largely a monument to Satan when we look at the policies? But the bottom line is that God can use even this. As I've pointed out before, when they put the Satan clubs in, what it does is they're putting these after-school Satan clubs in because they want to get rid of the after-school Bible clubs.

And yet, when they go in and they do this, people look at it, and then they say, this is pretty crazy. They find out about the after-school Bible programs that they didn't know about before. You see, God can use any of this stuff to further what he wants to do. You know, as we began by saying that the United Methodist Church wants to get rid of even the term husband and wife and mother and father, you have a movement, and a lot of it, I think, is just kind of a style type of thing. You know, TikTok type of thing, the trad wife movement. But there was an article in the epic times about a 22 year old who quits her

job and becomes a traditional wife. At first she's talking about how she just loves the 1940s. So this is very much of a style thing, but it is a bit deeper than that because as she gets into it, it talks about how, you know, they met through mutual friends and everything. And she said,

I'm doing this because my purpose is to honor and glorify God. And I don't see that very much in modern society. Well, I don't see it at all either. And that really is the issue. You know, we look at this. How are we going to live our lives? What is the purpose of our lives? Is the purpose of our life to honor God? Is the purpose of our life to honor

God? Is the purpose of my life to try to get as big an audience as? No, I don't care. I've got an audience of one. I've got an audience of one. And that's what I do this for. And because it bothers me, again, to see people sniping and killing and tricking and imprisoning people. I don't like that kind of corruption. We'll be right back. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Looking for better information? APSradioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.

APS Radio News dot com. Let's talk about money before our guest comes on from the last American vagabond. We're going to talk about fluoride. But U.S. national debt has now topped thirty four trillion in the first time in history. It's just grown by leaps and bounds since 2020 when Trump began the PPP stuff. But think about that. $34 trillion. That's more than $100,000 per man, woman, and child in the United States.

I guess maybe we need to bring in more illegal aliens to help pay this off. Well, no, the problem is that two-thirds of the illegal aliens who come in are on welfare. That's why I've said it's the magnet that nobody wants to do anything about. It's the magnet of welfare. We got in California, Gavin Newsom, first state to offer full insurance to illegal aliens. And so, again, it's all Cloward and Piven. That's opening up the floodgates so we can bankrupt the state.

But they can do it even without the illegal aliens, with all of their trillions of dollars of handouts that they were warned at the very beginning were going to be gamed and it was going to be corrupt. There was no controls on that. I've talked about that in the past. Just four decades ago, the national debt hovered around $907 billion. 0.9, 0.9 trillion.

Now it's $34 trillion. Growing by, you know, $6 or $7 trillion a year under Trump and Biden. And so that was happening 40 years ago. growing by, you know, six or seven trillion a year under Trump and Biden. And so that was happening 40 years ago. I remember the left raging at Ronald Reagan. Look at this exploding deficit. But it's the same kind of stuff that you see Speaker Johnson doing now. You know, it was always, you vote for mine and I'll vote for yours. And so you got Johnson who's saying, well, let's spend some money on the U.S. border, protecting it, and I'll open up the floodgates for you to send money to Ukraine.

It's that type of thing. That type of thing that exploded the deficit 40 years ago. But again, it's now 34 times bigger. Even more worrisome is that the spike in interest rates over the past year and a half has made the cost of servicing the debt more expensive. Because, of course, as interest rates rise and the deficit is exploding and the interest rates have gone up further and faster than we've ever seen in the past, not at a higher rate now than they got in the 1980s, but going up at a faster rate. Interest payments on the national debt are projected to be the fastest growing part of the federal budget over the next three decades.

For example, payments are expected to triple from nearly $475 billion in fiscal year 2022 to a stunning $1.4 trillion by 2032. One and a half trillion trillion just on interest. Who gets that? Federal Reserve. Why? Why are we paying them this? And of course, you know, they're going to be passing that on to people who bought their Federal Reserve bonds and other things like that, the whole system.

The interest payments are projected to surge to 5.4 trillion by 2053 by 2053 5.4 trillion dollars just on interest on the debt and that depends on what they're going to do with the interest rates could be worse that's more than the u.s spends on on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and all other mandatory and discretionary spending programs. Let me just say this. Under the Constitution, there's no mandates under the Constitution for them to spend a cent. They have some responsibility for defense, which they won't do. They won't even defend our borders. But all the rest of these programs that are entitlement programs,

that they say they have no discretion whatsoever about, those are unconstitutional, all of them. But so what do you do about this? How do you get out of this system? Well, again, gold gets you out of that system. It really does. And so that's one of the key reasons to try to get out of gold. And a lot of people are starting to realize this. First, it was Costco.

Now it's Walmart. You know, Costco said we sold $100 million in gold, and now Walmart is selling gold and silver. As one person on Twitter, Crypto Rich, said, are you awake yet? This is a financial change. A spike today in the price of gold, and it's attracting every last buyer, including Walmart and Costco buyers. They're all under the fear of missing out. Gold has taken off, and we got to, as Tony Ardman of Wise Wolf Gold always says, when you look at when the price of gold spikes up, everybody wants to rush in and buy it. Should rush in and buy it when it drops even.

Or just buy it all, you know, gradually over a period of time as he set up Wolfpack to do that. Because what you want to do is you want to get out of this system, this bankrupt system. And you want to get out of the web, the net that they're designing for everybody with CVDC. So, yeah, fear of missing out. But it's always a good time to get out of this fake system and understand that the spikes, again, as Tony's always pointed out, the spikes are just variations in this fiat currency. You know, you look at what gold buys in terms of, and there's been a lot of people have done various things. I remember the one that we talked about, uh, a suit, you know, a hundred years ago, uh, somebody, uh, buys a suit and they traveled to Europe and they were able to do all that with gold. And how much gold did it take for a custom suit?

And how much does that cost today in terms of fiat currency? And, um, you know, it, it stays, um, the goal stays about the same, but the fiat currency and um you know it stays um the gold stays about the same but the fiat currency goes way more way more costco and walmart's gold rush comes as gold prices have soared 14 percent since early october to a record new high of 2088 this week gold's strength has been underpinned by traders aggressive pricing of Federal Reserve rate cuts. As one person says, who's a portfolio manager at Tiberius Group, he says, gold is the answer for many things at the moment, whether it's inflation or whether it's carrying on or whether it's rate cuts with uncertainty or very costly wars.

But he doesn't even mention what I think is the biggest reason. That is CBDC. Free Thought Project says the CBDC. Freethought Project. As the CBDCs roll out, you've got different groups of crypto companies that are very connected to the globalist elite. And they're all competing with each other and making alliances with each other. Some of them making alliances with Bill Gates and some of them making alliances with Bill Gates. And some of them making alliances with the World Economic Forum. But they're all trying to position their product. To be the blockchain infrastructure for CBDC.

That's what they're all trying to do. And so he starts out by talking about Idris Elba. The actor who has done an elaborate promotional video for an organization called Stellar, saying that this is going to help marginalized people. Where have we heard this argument before? We've heard it from Bill Gates when he's pushing the ID number for everybody in India, the Aadhaar system. Oh, everybody needs to have an ID. These people are marginalized. They're out of the system and we got to get them in the system. Now they want, many of them would like to have more money, but they want to be out of heart system. Oh, everybody needs to have an ID. These people are marginalized. They're out of the system and we got to get them in the system. Now they want,

many of them would like to have more money, but they want to be out of the system. They, they aren't like, Oh, how can I get an ID? Right. And so they sell this as saying,

well, this is going to open up borderless opportunities. Well, borderless because it's going to be a global CBDC. That's what they're really pushing for. Unlimited hangout went through and and looked at the relationships between these people and um it's kind of interesting because there's three of them there's um this one from stellar and then there's also ethereum and uh then there's also Ethereum. And then there's also Ripple that are all positioning themselves. And they look at the relationship of these.

They're all tied one way or the other to the World Economic Forum or to Bill Gates. They have these different power coalitions that are forming to try to set up some kind of a global uh currency what i thought was interesting was that they were all founded at about the same time ripple came in in 2012 they called it open coin then in 2014 stellar was a spinoff of Ripple. That was in 2014. And then in 2014, you also had Ethereum created by Vitalik Buterin, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly. Anyway, so you have these three competitors. One of them created in 2014. Two of them, sorry, 2012, two of them in 2014.

And I find that very interesting because it was in 2015, I believe, the first time I remember seeing it, was that they began to be very specific about the UN 2030 agenda. It was 2015, about a year or two after these currencies started coming out, because it is such a fundamental part of all of that. Prior to that, they had talked about Agenda 21, the UN Agenda 21. Sometime in the 21st century, we're going to pack everybody into these massive mega smart cities. And then they got into a very certain date. And it was about that time to start saying, you will own nothing. We will control everything. So it is Ethereum. And even in Ethereum, Buterin, who was one of the co-founders of that, is saying, well, you know, there's some really

dystopian things that CBDC can be used for, but you're starting to see all the big corporations, whether it is MasterCard or whether it's Stripe, uh, all joining together on one of these three, uh, players, uh,

Peter Thiel is, uh, connected with stellar. And so as open AI is, um, Sam Altman. Uh, so they're pushing together on that side of it. In terms of Ethereum and Buterin, in a September 2023 interview, he said these digital currencies

can provide convenience, but they end up being even less private and they basically break down all of the existing barriers against both corporations and government at the same time. It said in 2022, the crypto itself has a lot of dystopian potential if implemented wrong. And so that's where we are. You know, they have, as he points out in this article, going back even looking at connections to the CIA, connections to the NSA, Bitcoin secure hash algorithm. 256 was actually developed by a mathematician who is now the chief mathematician at the NSA. So a lot of people said, well, Bitcoin was developed by the NSA.

They point out that this algorithm had been made public before Bitcoin came out. But nevertheless, you've had the CIA bragging about how blockchain technology is, quote, a powerful but underutilized forensic tool for governments to identify illicit activity and bring criminals to justice. That's CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell. You see, it is, as he said, it's a boon for surveillance. and bring criminals to justice. That's CIA deputy director, Michael Morell. You see it is, as he said, it's a boon for surveillance. That's one of the things that I have a problem with, with cryptocurrency. And it's one of the reasons why I prefer gold because I'm not interested in the investment aspect of it or the, you know, whereas gold relative to the continually fluctuating price, uh, or, you know, uh, of value of the fiat currencyiat currency. My concern is really about the surveillance aspect of it.

And that's what is open to people with blockchain. Yes, there are some, you know, there's Monero and there's the PirateCoin. I can't remember the exact name of it. It's something about PirateCoin. And I've interviewed him before, one of the people involved with that but it is that connection to surveillance that i think is is the big issue so we're about to join our our guest here let's just say one more thing as we do it this is from an article called the end of money as we know it which is kind of a paraphrase of the end of the world as we know it you know when everybody's talking about prepping for total disaster, it says that central banks

prepare the way for digital currencies, which are the closest thing to surveillance disguised as money. Reserves of value are more needed than ever before. Gold is likely to be a good de-correlated asset that protects against the debasement of sovereign bonds and of domestic currencies, as well as surveillance. And so that's why I'm proud to have Tony as a sponsor, as a supporter of this program. David Knight dot gold is what he set up to take you to wise wolf gold. And you can, um, you know, unlike a Costco and Walmart, he will lock in the price for you.

Uh, they'll tell you, I'm sorry, I'm just out of it right now. He'll get you a good price. He'll lock in the price for whatever you want, large or small. And you can purchase that on a regular basis with Wolfpack. So we're going to take a quick break. Before we do, by the way, let me just read out some of the names of people who have supported us in December. These are December checks that we got we got really do appreciate this as i said before um um it's going to be a difficult year i think because there's a lot of people even people listen to this program as i was talking

about earlier who just don't understand my opposition to trump for whatever reason but that's only going to escalate so i really do appreciate the support that we got. Let me read through the list real quickly here because we don't have any other way to get back to the people who have supported us through cards and, and via mail, Fred and Jackie Faye, super Faye. Thank you. Tom and Rachel L Lloyd P Philip and Kelly M Jennifer L. Stephanie K. John R. Ronald C.

John W. Jack H. Mary Ellen M. Ty S. Jeremy and Amanda. David and Anne Marie N. Bob S. Minor Mike.

Gonzalo M. M-A-G. Just the initials. And Joshua S. David and Debbie W. Robin R. Richard R. Heidi W.

Tom and Nancy K. Charlie S. Thank you very much. And again, that's APS. And Linda E. And Ron and Deborah H. Thank you very much. Amos Poole also, as mentioned, sent a book as well as that.

And W. Jack, thank you, all of you, for the support. We couldn't do this program without your support. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk to Ryan Christian with The Last American Vagabond. We've got a lot of things we want to talk about. We're going to talk about fluoridation. We're going to talk about an article that he's got there about the pathology of the mRNA Trump shots,

as discovered by a recently passed away pathologist who came out of retirement to look at the mRNA pathology. And also about Pfizer and digital IDs in Gaza, because this is about controlling people. We'll be right back. Hear news now at APSradioNews.com, or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story. 🎵 Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show all right joining us now is ryan christian of the last american vagabond.com and i wanted to get ryan on i i talked about uh a landmark fluoride lawsuit i saw this um reprinted on free thought project but of course um it goes back uh quite a while um the last american vagabond has been covering this fluoride trial going back to November of last year, not this

light, but November of 2022. And then again in the summer, because this is something that has drug on for years in legal limbo, and it's now about to come back up in January. So I wanted to get Ryan on to talk about that and some other issues. Thank you for joining us, Ryan. Hey, my pleasure, David. It's an honor to be on with you. It's a lot of our audience overlaps and it's something people have been asking for for

a long time. So it's my pleasure to join you. Well, thank you. Thank you. It's great to have you on. And especially, I thought it was very important and I'd not noticed this lawsuit until you picked it up and you've been on it. As you pointed out, the mainstream media and even conservative media is not really talking

about what's going on this fluoride lawsuit bring us up to date as to some of the aspects of this and and we can talk a little bit about what we anticipate is going to happen as it resumes really in this month but give people kind of a background of what's been happening with us yeah first of all the the credit really goes to derrick bros the writer for the last american vagabond who also runs the consciouscious Resistance, who's been doing this work on this specific topic even before the, as we've termed it, the fluoride trial began. So a lot of great credit goes to Derek Brose for keeping up on this when so many others are, you know, it's such an important topic and so many others, including independent media, aren't really talking about this. And it's such an important topic and so many others including independent media aren't really talking about this and it's it's such an important shift in the understanding and so for people to understand there's been a debate about fluoride in your water for a long time and a quick small

background on that it really breaks down to being a byproduct that was i mean think of it this way it's a byproduct that these companies would otherwise have to pay to dispose of and ultimately now pay to put into our water under the argument that it somehow benefits our our teeth which i mean i make the joke all the time where it's like our government barely wants to take care of us in serious ways but we're going to pretend we're going to pay money to keep our teeth white it just doesn't make any sense and even then you could talk about uh fluoridosis the dental fluorosis of the teeth which is what actually happens when people have too much fluoride but so really this has been put in our water. You could argue that they think it's good for you or not. The point is that the information over a very long period of time, and it goes

back a long time, peer-reviewed study after peer-reviewed study finds that it is damaging. Now, there's a whole level when you get into the different science and different opinions of how damaging. But let's be clear clear it is not healthy for you and it has a lot of dangerous effects it is neurotoxic and i'll get into the studies that are showing this the most important point they're pushing in in the in the trial right now is that it is actually hurting your children it is reducing the iq of your children and it is in fact neurotoxic and it has a lot of deleterious effects yes now the point of the trial now this came in regard to the the national national toxicology program basically trying to push, investigate this study, this toxicology report, where they're trying to basically get this study to be seen and acknowledged by the U.S. government.

Now, at the moment, they've been dragging their feet on this for, I think, over four years since this report has been completed. Now, this is the important part, and this is largely because of the fluoride action network. I mean, almost entirely, they've been really driving this entire thing. And the report has been finished. The report has been stated to be finished. And every single time it comes to a sort of a point of culmination, they argue some things needed. We need another report.

We need another evaluation this time. And this is, you know, there's a lot we can get into in between all of that, right? And what it came down to in the last year Derek's been covering this is they essentially said, look, we have the report that's done. It has all the information included. You guys have checked off on it. Just because you want another group that's not included to reevaluate this does not change the fact that the report has been completed. And it shows exactly what you guys are trying to refuse to show and all that ultimately happened was interestingly enough of all people rachel levine put her basically stepped in and said nope we're going to pause this and this is publicly discussed

until further notice and that was after all these different delays now judge chen who is the who is the one who's been involved in this this entire process basically agreed with this you can sense frustration through these processes and this entire time it's been involved in this entire process, basically agreed with this. You can sense frustration through these processes. And this entire time it's been done via Zoom because of COVID-19 or the illusion they're in. And now what's happened today, or rather over the last so many months, weeks, is they ultimately, Judge Chen came back and said,

okay, we're going to have the final push for this. It's going to be in person. So one thing we're trying to fly out, we're going to be flying out Derek to cover this in person, trying to raise some funds for that. And he's going to be going either way. And what we're expecting is the actual culmination here where I don't see how they can get away with another dragging of their feet. This is going to be the moment we're hoping where they essentially go, okay, the report is public. Here's what it shows. And then it really is a game of who chooses to acknowledge it, which we already know how that works, But it's there. And the evidence is astoundingly clear.

Well, you know, it's interesting. And you talk about this in your articles as well. CDC says, well, this is our crowning achievement, you know, of the 20th century until I guess they get their mRNA vaccines. But really what we're talking about here, above and beyond the debate over medical issues, is we're talking about coerced consumption or coerced treatment right and so in that way it ties to what we've just been through with the medical martial law in the last couple of years very tightly to that we see the cdc is going to decide what they're going to put in your body one way or the other put it in the water supply or put it in and coerce you through uh you know the vaccine programs you're not going to go anywhere or do anything or have a job unless you get this. So they're all about this forced medication.

And to me, that ought to be the showstopper right there. We got a lot of data that's gone over a lot of years. Harvard even did a study talking about the correlation between lower IQ in children and fluoridation in the water. So we can have these arguments, and we should have these arguments about this. But to me, it kind of feels like, for the longest time, it feels like, you know, the debate that we had over just the mRNA vaccine.

You know, it's like, well, this is something that's new. It's not been tested. But regardless, you don't have any right to coerce me into this. And that's really what is at the basis of all this fluoride stuff. It's big corporations working with the CDC for their financial benefit, and they're forcing you to consume this stuff.

That's the worst thing. Not only are they ripping us off, but they're poisoning us one way after the other, aren't they? Yeah, that's such an important point. And exactly where I'm coming from in this is that, obviously, we should be engaging with the fact that these things are dangerous, and they're killing people in the sense of the COVID-19 injections. And that's an important primary part of this, but obviously the central conversation should be around whether or not it's dangerous. Do they have the right to just coerce you into doing this? Or, I mean, I agree with the

word coerce in this, however, but people would argue that essentially it's not being coerced, it's just being put, but ultimately it's the same conversation, right?, right? That you ultimately don't have a choice here unless you want to. And this is the choice game they play with the COVID-19 injections. Well, you can go buy bottled water. Well, not everybody has the option to do that. And ultimately, it's not healthy anyway. So I think it's an early example of how they were trying to, and to your point, go back and state for this long period of time that that's our crowning achievement, trying to create the illusion, the understanding, the impression that this was a success. And that's why that's the precedent for X, Y, and Z coming next. And there's been conversations about lithium

in the water. I mean, I often point to this, a study that's been done more than once, in fact, where at high levels, NIH was one of them discussing that should there be a need for some kind of, in this case, it was a bioethics, like an mRNA conversation, a need for something like that to be done compulsory, like we saw with COVID-19. They've argued time and again that it should be done secretly because, well, they don't understand. And that was in peer-reviewed science. That was before COVID-19. So I think that plays a factor.

But the whole point is the mindset of what they think they're allowed to do, whether or not, really, it's counter to constitutional rights, and they know that. That's right. And as we look at this, to bring this up to date and to look forward into the future, we now see these people, it goes, hey, we know that you don't like to get the shots, and so we're not going to stick a needle in your arm. Instead, we've got these other forms of delivery including aerosol mrna so there's a lot of talk about that there's talk about putting it into our food mrna shots and things like that so again if we let this principle stand that they can put stuff in without our knowledge without our consent they're going to find a way to do that with many other products and probably already are you know certainly food additives and other things like that that are happening in the way they've contaminated so

many things but but again wherever we see this we need to oppose this openly what they're trying to do in a hidden way without our consent and it's going to come across a whole spectrum of things let me also point out too something else that I think correlates with the vaccine stuff, and that is the dosage, right? How do you control the dosage for something that you dump into the water? Well, I think the answer is that you don't. You know, they can come up with a concentration of it, but that's not necessarily going to be the concentration that you get out of it. And then when you dump it into the water, you're giving the same dosage of this to a baby that you're giving to a 200-pound man. Okay, so how do they justify something like that?

And when you look at the mRNA aspect of it, when you had the mRNA shots going out, we now know from looking at these different lots that different lots varied by a factor of 33. From the lowest to the highest dosage, the highest dosage was 33 times what you would get at the lowest dosage. To me, that looks very much like what they're doing in terms of dumping this stuff in the water. And if you don't control for dosage, any medication, even something that's beneficial, turns into a poison. Yes, well said, exactly. And I think this overlaps with the first point you made in regard to the

MRNA and where it's going. But you know, the first obvious point there is it's such an important thing to think about is that they, in any number of these conversations, you can see that kind of disregard for, for the dose conversation actually. And I wanted to point out that in regard to the lot,

I think that's a really important conversation that we, that still needs more investigation. But one of the arguments that i want people to remember is i think it was ryan cole made the argument that it's not necessarily that that proves that was a deliberate act which i'm completely considering that it is but that he argues that it's part of it is that they're the mrna essentially or rather the lipid nanoparticles broke down and in ultimately that then changed or altered the the dose comparatively in one case anyway and argued in some cases that might have actually saved people's lives but you know the mrna itself is dangerous spike protein and so on but i but to your other point and i just want to include that because i think it's fascinating

kind of where you know look just so it's clear i 100 think there was deliberate malfeasance and then deliberate actual criminal action to hurt people. I really believe that. I do, too. But it's interesting to think about the fact that it overlapped with that. There was just simple mistakes by people that don't care about your safety in conclusion, in combination. But to your other point. Let me say before we leave that, you know, when we look at that, and I made this point when we looked at it's like a factor of 33 it's like

3300 percent more dosage i said how in the world does this happen in pharmaceutical world right you know they're so careful about the dosages and the quantities that they put out there and they have to be because as i said before it turns into a poison how could you have a manufacturer that's kind of again maybe it's something about the lipid nanoparticles breaking down i don't know but it seems to me that is so extreme I can't imagine how that could be done in a pharmaceutical environment without deliberate malfeasance with that or whatever you want to call it, maliciousness. But it seems to me that it'd have to be a deliberate process. But go ahead to the other point. I agree completely.

I think that really it matters, obviously, whether it's deliberate or not. But in the larger sense, it kind of doesn't. It just shows you that either way, obviously, it still leans to the point that we should have a choice here. Either they're making so many mistakes that are killing people or they're choosing to. It kind of amounts to the same point. But on the other side of it, the mRNA part of it, to overlap that with what you were saying, it's exactly what my one of my biggest fears around all of this is either the step that's already taken that we're unaware of, or that we haven't acknowledged or that is about to happen,

which is in regard to the self spreading and really the same one step before that, the self amplifying vaccines, which I think that's what this already is. They've already argued this. One of Pfizer's earliest documents said self amplifying in regard to their Pfizer BNT to a one B two, I 1B2, I think, that series. And then that went away. And all that really means is that it essentially continues to produce the spike protein

in a simplified way. And that's what we know is happening already. As I think Dr. Peter McCullough, in a unchallenged peer-reviewed study that still stands on Elisavir, the sustained synthesis of the spike protein, that's what we're seeing. It's undeniable. And we'll get into arna burkhart same point finding spike protein all over the body and the same kind of things but my point is that the self-spreading which i i again question whether that might have already been used the omicron overlap and how that seems to be kind of a similar point and where it started in botswana or where they claim it was south africa and but diplomats that we can't verify that came from botswana you know diplomatic community it seems like something was executed

there my point though is that self-spreading whether happening or next step is is it keeps me up at night we're talking about something that's already been designed they've talked about this going back as far as I don't know if you're familiar with it but it's called insect allies it was a CDC program that scientists around the world signed documents saying you know we know what you're doing this is dual use technology it's a weapon and they made it, but they just kind of walked it back. Now we're talking about the same concept with, with pathogens or whatever you want to understand it as where it's something that can be released that literally spreads from person to person. And they proudly say, and it inoculates these people and there's no need for informed

consent. Like that's a proud statement coming from the people discussing this. That really concerns me. And to your point, there's no dosage there. You can get back, you know, inoculated, whatever you want to call it over and over and over. If you're around the same people with the same thing happening, I don't know how they make sense of that. And, you know, there's the also, you know, besides the aerosol delivery that they're talking about and putting it in food, they're talking about, there's also the issue of shedding.

I was just talking to a friend this last weekend back in austin and he never took the vaccine uh but he's he's got very sick with uh covid and um it's it's uh taken out his hearing in one ear is so congested with it uh he went to the dog didn't get into his chest into pneumonia but um he went to the doctor and they were doing some blood tests and they were trying to draw the blood out and he said it literally took them like 20 minutes to get a sufficient amount of blood to come out he said the blood just wasn't flowing the technician said have you ever had a problem like this before he goes no it's like his blood was super super thick and so the question is you know is this something that is spreading even to unvaccinated people? They don't want their, they have nothing but contempt for our consent.

That's the key thing. And they don't follow any procedures or testing. You know, they don't, they don't even pretend to do testing to see if this stuff is safe or not. We've had that discussion through this mRNA stuff all along. And that's really began though with fluoride many many years ago as you point out it was a industrial waste product that they would have had to pay a lot of money to get rid of it's used as rat poison in china and yet if they told everybody that this is going to be something's going to help your teeth they could get paid to

dump it into our water that's the most amazing thing isn't't it? It is. It is. And one more point before we go, if we go back to Florida, just that the overlap there you made is so important that it's, this is why I'm convinced this was not by accident. That every single choice made, whether we're talking about the choice to make people wear cloth masks, where a peer-reviewed study in 2015 proved that it increased your risk of illness, every choice that was made deliberately seemed, well, I think deliberately seemed to increase all the problems. But it's the overlap of both mechanisms here, or rather just aspects of it. The mRNA itself, as you pointed out, is at least now being discussed,

as I think it was an overlap of MIT and Harvard, of both the aerosolization of it, and as well as the fact that it can be deployed via particle. So they can release all the nanoparticles, and it can inoculate you in the same way they say. But so that's one side of it. And let's not forget the technology they argue is that mRNA is the instruction to create the spike protein. But then as you point out, the spike protein itself, however, that comes along in and of itself is cytotoxic. That Salk Institute proved that with a peer reviewed study. And the point was that itself, and this was the main point they said, the spike protein is capable of shedding, or rather they in that study, they didn't say shedding, but rather just the in and of itself and this was the main point they said the spike protein is capable of shedding or rather they in that study they didn't say shedding but rather just this in and of itself can cause disease which means that gives you symptoms which means it can then be spread so

whatever whatever you want to call that how is that not a self-spreading concept i mean that's what we're you know you get the spike proteins delivered then it spreads to somebody else but the real problem is that we also know as dr. Warren, Luigi Warren, who was one of the primary people in regard to this technology itself, the discovery of mRNA said that, yes, of course it can shed rather than spike protein itself. He said, of course it can shed, but he argued at the time that it was not likely to get you sick because the amount was so small, but we've then later come to find out that it was sustained synthesis. So it's all there. If you really just look at the information, so you're definitely spreading spike protein. And to your question, I really don't know whether it's a risk. I would imagine it clearly is to the average person, but you know, it's about keeping healthy

and fighting things off like anything, you know, but ultimately I think that's a deliberate action. Oh yeah. Yeah. I said from the very beginning, I said, okay, so as they're describing this self-replicating and, you know, as Trump had his little dog and pony show, he went around the table. How long is it going to take you? That's too long. Next person is faster. And then they finally get to the punchline.

It's like, well, we can do it right now because we can turn your body into a manufacturing plant. And I said, okay, so as they're describing this, it sounds like cancer or something. So how do you turn this thing off? You know, how do you stop this? And it turns out as people are starting to see, no, it doesn't turn off. It keeps going on. It keeps replicating.

It keeps amplifying, as you pointed out. And so that's where we are with this. But again, I think the fluoride thing is important from a health standpoint, and I think it's also important that people see the bigger picture and how this has been done for many decades they really kind of set this precedent of coerced ingestion of their stuff for their corporate cronies and i think there's a lot of that that is connected let me ask you this so as we move forward to this you're talking about the report that was there and there's a an article that just came out saying that in um uh that last

wednesday uh there was a let me find the um uh the thing yeah here it is a report linking fluoride to lower iq and children is made public after the cdc and the hhs tried to block it is that something that's a new development because you've been talking about this for a long time. Is that the report that, I call him Dick Devine, Rachel Levine or whatever. Is that the report that he tried to suppress? Or is this something that is different from that? Yeah, I'm not familiar with what article you're referencing. If it's new, then it's old. I mean, Derek covered that exact point, I think, maybe six months ago.

I think that's the same report so basically i this is in the opening discussion i don't think i mentioned that the reason that we know and verbatim what the report already shows is because it was leaked it already the information was already released it was already discussed and it's already present now that's what's so crazy is that you could we we link to the report in our coverage so it's already present and yet the corporate media nobody's talking about it and so crazy is that you could, we, we linked to the report in our coverage, so it's already present. And yet the, the, not the corporate media, nobody's talking about it. And so, yeah, that, that, that might, if it's a new article, that's a little bit of old news, but I'm glad it's getting out to people. You know, it's important because of the, the it's

damning. I mean, it really is. There's literally nothing in there that even gives you the indication that there might be a benefit to it. And that's why I think they're dragging their feet. That's the craziest part to think about. So they're aware of what it says they're not even disputing what it says they're just going like well let's get more evaluation from groups that have no historical being involved in this process you know and yet they are okay allowing it to continue to be in your water while it's hurting your children but we know different than in vaccinations or anything else we're talking about but it just shows a level of deliberate harm i think you know like choosing to let this happen oh yeah absolutely and and you know they played this game with a scientist who said well we've got our conclusion let us put it

out there if you disagree with it you can do that but that's not the way the game's played the way the game is played is to shut down anything that goes against their narrative and that even happens of course internally when you've got government scientists who are talking about the dangers of fluoride. They're just going to suppress that. That's where we are right now. And that's why it's very important for people to see, you know, the last American vagabond. You guys have been covering this stuff, and thanks for doing that. It's just amazing to me how nobody really seems to care about anything except the presidential

election, which isn't going to change anything. You know, if you're going to get focused on politics, focus locally as to what's going to happen there. But, you know, it takes up everybody's. It's all about entertainment. It's about national politics. And yet none of the people in national politics are going to put any restrictions on the CDC, let alone get rid of it. This predatory organization has been poisoning us since the middle of the 20th century, just in the water, let alone the vaccines that they're involved in. You've got an article at Last American Vagabond about Arnie Burkhart. Tell us a little bit about this guy who came out of retirement to take a look at mRNA.

Yeah, we're very, very very very proud of this work and taylor hudak deserves every ounce of credit for the amazing work that was done here and she's a a writer and and interviewer for the last american vagabond it's it's profound and quite frankly probably one of the things i'm most proud of that we've ever done at the last american vagabond and it is it's a you know high level multi-camera kind of in his lab interview and this was the final interview he gave before he died and there's a lot of discussion to be had around that that's something that i think we're going to dive into going forward but it's a it's a very strange circumstance but the so he as you said he came he you know was basically in the process of retiring was you know that it was as he says in the interview, it was something,

somebody contacted him with this information and he kind of felt drawn to do something about it. And that drew him back into this. And so he was, as we now know, looking back, one of the few people that were willing to go through and do what they thought was right. And that's one of the things, by the way, to state right out of the gate,

that it's just blowing over the top in this interview his integrity is impossible to miss every is what he's doing is is at his expense and he was doing it because he thought it was right you know going to the point to where he was working with other german uh pathologists and in the beginning until suddenly whoever whatever happened somebody told him no they thought it was conspiracy theory they all just dropped it and ran and so he was the, he got pulled into it and then ended up being the only one really driving this forward, save for the people in his inner circle. So the bottom line is he was a, you know, very, very highly respected pathologist. And he went into this work and started doing autopsies where people, as you well know, were not doing them. Like this is the lie

that we were sold from the CDC. As I, like I broke down in the first year they're they're they're not doing the work they claim they were doing in the investigation around the people they claim are dying they're not you know or rather i think more so into the second year when the injections were given in regard to the byproducts of what was happening and they remember they claimed we're investigating every one of them until it came out that they didn't have the resources to do that let alone the autopsies let alone interview everybody you know and so he started doing this and and lo and behold it was exactly what we found and i think the two other examples that i've seen of autopsies that it's your body is being overwhelmed with this process i mean we can get into the different and to be

clear i'm in no way an expert like he was and even taylor i think is far more immersed in the interworkings of how these things all operate but But really coming down to just some of the things I pulled up, the first part of it was the assumption of what was really being caused in the process of these injections. And so people were, like we all saw, they were saying, well, this looks like this. Therefore, it was caused by COVID. And nobody was doing the histopathology. Nobody was really diving into it to find these things out and what he ultimately found is what we what we all talk about the thrombocytes thrombosis even um uh dr bakhti made this claim right in the first year if i remember correctly the the vitt vaccine induced thrombocytosis thrombocytopenia and so as he

points out in this that it's really about this is your body's process to try to like heal the problems that are being created by by the injection but see the problem is that's never stopping so it causes all these blood clots he talks about uh lymph lymphocytic inflammation which is the kind of you know i've talked about systemic inflammation for a long time and i think that's what ultimately this develops into and and then he argues the most alarming problem and this is what he argued was the vasculitis the argument about the you know the the brain and the as well as the endothelial cells and and the the blood vessels and how this is all causing the blood clots and the breakdown of your system i personally find the most alarming aspect of this to be the sperm point and he made this point before this interview and in a public presentation,

but he really made this clear in this interview with Taylor that there, there, in my opinion, there's just no way that this was an accident. I mean, you can go back as far as you want and find other research showing the same overlap, knowing how this process works,

that he basically shows that these, these are passing through your sperm. And I mean, I think Dr. Peter McCough has made that point as well i mean and i don't know how we get away from something like that i often make the point about glyphosate in the sense that we had a chance in time to maybe stop what they did with that but at this point it's the world around it's in the area breathing it's the clothes you're wearing it's literally everywhere and so how we stop this i think should be another main focus in regard to the spread of these kind of things but we're right now battling with people's awareness of whether this is even the case that's right that's the hardest part that's right yeah we've

got a lot of scientists and medical people who are now looking at this but of course from the very beginning the same type of stuff we're talking about the fluoride was the big warning sign about this it's not been tested we know what these people are doing yeah and they've come up with all these he's talking about oh well look this is long covet or now they talk about holiday heart or this is a new variant is going to come after your heart or the brain fog there was a study i talked about yesterday they said well you know look at this brain fog that it must be due to covet they said as they did the study they found that it was due to people being in the hospital so they said it's not the hospital though it's serious illness no matter what it points to i had an orthopedic surgeon who got

the shot because he was being coerced into doing it and it ended his career he can't do surgery anymore and uh and with all the horrible symptoms that he's having he went to doctor after doctor and they would just say nope i'm not going to touch this they're afraid of this one there's one of the reasons why uh burkhart who is retired i think he came out he didn't have you know you know it makes it easier when you don't have your career on the line and uh but you know still it's a a bull thing to come out and oppose this and to expose this and perhaps he did pay the price for this, for doing that. But for the most part, he finally, this orthopedic surgeon that I interviewed,

he found a doctor, he said, well, I know what it is, and you know what it is, but we're not going to say that, and I'll help to try to treat you with this. That's how afraid everybody is of identifying what this Trump shot is doing to people. Yeah, yeah. I also, and I believe he's also an orthopedic surgeon uh dr malik i just recently interviewed similar similar point except he he basically went to you know he went with the truth and ultimately lost his career for it and now he's spreading you know trying to do podcasts and just talk about this and so i was all like promoting his work because it's you know anybody that's willing to sacrifice everything for the truth is somebody

that i respect you know it's yeah it's really this whole process has been so overwhelmingly obvious from day one, in my opinion. You know, everything seemed to be clear and the almost deliberate effort to both create the circumstance to drive this on people. And this is where I get into the question of what the ultimate outcome, what the ultimate driving purpose was of all this. And I think it is ultimately to create the setting, sort of like we talk about the fluoride step into what we're doing now for whatever is coming next. And I think that this has been a resounding failure. Dr. Fauci has written articles in Cell.com that make the argument that this didn't work. And we're not even taking a step back. I mean, they're now driving aggressively into things like ferret nanoparticle universal

flu vaccines. That's literally about to come out. Or a pan-coronavirus vaccine also using ferret nanoparticles, which, I mean, The Guardian wrote an article about this, I think, in 2006 in regard to how the ferret nanoparticle injections were used to literally control the movements of these animals and insects. Now, that may sound ridiculous to some people, but The Guardian covered this, and it's a peer-reviewed science that overlaps with people that were involved with the COVID-19 injection, one of them being Bob Langer, the co-founder of Moderna.

So these things are very real, and it's an alarming step that I think we're seeing. That's why I think this conversation and what we're doing is so important, so people realize not what's coming next, but that it's already happening, you know? That's right. Yeah, when we look at nanotech, that's one of the things that is so, you just don't know what they're capable of doing. It's got like infinite possibilities and, you know, as people look at artificial intelligence and some of these other things, I think the most opaque of all of these is really nanotech,

that people don't really understand the capabilities that are there. But when we look at the overall picture, and I've talked about this with Netanyahu and pushing his own people in Israel as lab rats, pushing them to Pfizer. And, of course, I've played the clips of him multiple times, doing a teleconference with the World Economic Forum, Davos, talking about how he's constantly on the phone with Moderna and all these other people, how they're using his people as lab rats.

It's just amazing. And yet, another part of it was they were really leading in terms of tying a digital ID. That's a big part of where this is all coming. And you got an article that came out just, let's see, December 27th, just the end of last week. Pfizer is experimenting in Gaza with a digital ID, just the beginning of this. So tell us now what is happening.

We know what Netanyahu did to you know push israel to the front of the line uses people as lab rats to collect data for pfizer and then to push the digital id what is happening now in gaza with that well i just to clarify the title and this is the way i i my title my show is often that there's a comment that's kind of like separate topics but but ultimately the pfizer part of it is they're they're right now experimenting with a a it is stated an experimental injection to fight what was i think uh a fungus of undefined origin and this and this goes into the very alarming discussion about what's been done to gaza and i'm not even getting into the bombing aspect of it just the the deliberate kind of destabilization, the flooding, which weirdly was stopped to discuss.

They no longer talk about it on the corporate media. And right after that happened, we saw this flooding. And, yes, it was raining, but I've never seen this kind of flooding before in the area. That's as they're flooding underneath the ground that rose up to their waist in many places. You know, and so what that caused is what they worried about was a massive spreading of waste. And, you know, it caused the spreading of illness. so one part of it is wondering whether this was deliberate right and then and then asker i mean we've talked about the as i'm sure you have discussed before the concept of israel's battle-tested weapons that they test on palestinians and then sell as battle-tested so i wonder what this kind of dynamic is as you

mentioned as netanyahu openly stated that this is pf or rather Pfizer called it Pfizer's lab, as he openly stated, they were allowing them to find out how these things worked on people. So what they're using is an injection that Pfizer, of course, is is testing and it's it's barely tested. It's experimental. And interestingly, this is designed to stop in one case, Candida Albicon, which was guess what? The thing that was spreading through hospitals during all of the covet 19 discussion so i don't know if there's an exact point that makes that overlap but i found that interesting either case the point is that pfizer yet again is being allowed to experiment on the israeli people or in this case the palestinian people because they're being told they can based on something that we can't even define the the digital id part of it was

just going into the deeper part of it which i can't easily overlap with israel in the point made and all of this is i mean this is this is a universal agenda as i think you're well aware of and this is going around the world and it is already happening now i think what is the original drive was sort of as we all saw the vaccine passport and the argument that that was in you know one that we're stepping into a technological world so we shouldn't do paper anymore but rather that it was safer and less dangerous germs in the paper you know and so that didn't work i mean clearly people pushed back they tried it worked in some cases but it wasn't as sound as i think they wanted now it's sort of coming the other way and this is how i see this happening and this is where you know israel's involved with the cbdc

aspect and and what they're creating is this justification for digital currency. In the same discussion, they say paper money is dangerous and spreads pathogens. And so what I believe is now going to happen is sort of the inverse of what I expected, which is that the CBDC aspect is going to be pushed on us. Maybe because of some mass event that wipes out all of their paper money records, and they have to dole out digital currency. That's a worry that I have. But then that will be the point at which, and this

is my, my, my guess where they say, oh, well, we'll, we'll give you back your digital currency. We don't worry. You didn't lose anything. As long as you sign up for this digital ID that then we'll allow you to have it. I mean, who wouldn't go through that process to get what they think is theirs back? You know, the money you stored in a bank before the EMP or whatever happens. Now I'm not saying I think that's happening i just think that's a possibility so that being said last point is just that this is how we're seeing this driven in everywhere around the world

coercion as you're pointing out the justification that is needed because these people in south america don't have rights without it which is a lie or you know any number of ways that's happening that's right and and that's when i can And that's why I tried to get people to understand that the way the government gets what it wants is usually not with direct mandates and coercion. It's usually with bribery. And they can conveniently, with some kind of a financial crisis,

take everything away from you and then dole this out. That's what they did, Bill Gates did, with Aadhaar in India. He went to the poor people and said, well, we'll give you health care, we'll give you welfare, but you're going to have to take the number. And so I think that's what they did bill gates did with adhar in india he went to the poor people and said well we'll give you health care we'll give you welfare uh but you're going to take the number and uh and so i think that's going to be the way they're going to do this so probably even pull um kind

of a world coin type of thing and say hey we know this this new stuff here we're going to give you a special treatment reduce the taxes or something or you know here's some free money but you got to sign up for this stuff and so it'll be that way. It'll be done as something that you must accept or that you made as an offer for you to accept. But they will make your life very difficult if you don't accept it. They will take things away and then offer this as a carrot to you. And that's the way the federal government always operates. They operate by using their ability to create money out of thin air.

They use it to bribe states and local governments to, you know, here's a bunch of money. Now, if you don't do X, we're going to take that money away. It doesn't matter whether you're talking about the boys in the girls' bathroom or whether you're talking about any of these other issues. I think that is going to be the way they're going to operate. They're going to create some kind of a crisis. This will be their helping hand to you. It won't probably come to you as a mandate and and that's the scary thing because this is being pushed by um you know the cbdc and the digital id stuff and everything is being pushed by both biden and the trump administration was being pushed it was

pushing it jared kushner when he was there was pushing uh cbdc and um so for the most part the politicians won't even talk about this and as you pointed out every country every political philosophy every political party was marching in lockstep to this global agenda throughout 2020 it truly was amazing to see and it is amazing i think ryan as i try to talk about this people just well trump never forced anything on anybody it's like okay you know we just we got this partisan blindness about this because we're lined up behind, you know, the left or the right or the Republicans or Democrats. And we can't say what is actually being done to us and what they're going to do in the

future. But I think you're right. I think it will be presented to us as, well, here's this, this nice stuff that you can, we're going to help you out after the problems that we created. That's always what they do. Well, what I often have said over the years is it started, that's how it starts every time where it's less like we saw with the COVID

injection. It's, you know, here, this, if you take this thing or you do this action, you get to go to the front of the line. Yeah.

Right. But then, then eventually when, especially if nobody does it, they go, okay, but now if you don't do it, now you go to the back of the line,

right? Then it becomes, well, if you don't do it, you're killing grandma. So we have to do it right. Like that's the back of the line, right? Then it becomes, well, if you don't do it, you're killing grandma. So we have to do it, right? Like that's the escalation we've seen. And so that's where I worry about this is I feel like we've already passed that step

where they're trying to go like, look at this great new thing. So I worry that it's going to be something that's a little bit more coercive or like a rug pull kind of an action. But, you know, I think that it all very clearly shows you that the same people that, you know, a good example is something like the GMO program. Right. How is it possible that we have somebody like Bill Gates who has spectacularly in worldview failed? Right. The company, the countries that they were pushing GMOs on are more food insecure now than they were before they pushed that agenda. So the point is, we let them just try again with another GMO product.

You know, these people are connected with all of this and that includes the CBDCs, that includes, you know, it's all interconnected. Now, for those that feel like that somehow starts to develop into an image of what you think you're supposed to dispute as conspiracy theory, it's just a reality of the way the world works. As you well know, David, the powerful people will often collect, conspire, if you will. You can use whatever word you want to decide what they will do to gain more power, to influence their position. And you could pretend that sometimes that overlaps with what's best for the people. Quite frankly, I think that's just a coincidence

when that happens. Oh, yeah. Yeah. It absolutely is true. And that's why I try to explain to people, it doesn't matter what country or what party, but it blinds people because they get into these political loyalties to really see what's going on. And it is across the board. And that's what's so dangerous about this is that they control and manipulate us with this phony competition between different groups that are both pushing for the same thing. And so that's why it's very important. I want to keep track of what's going on with the fluoride stuff. So I know we'll be talking again about that. That's a very important thing.

And again, it shows the long-term disregard for our choice as well as a caution of consumption of this stuff. That in and of itself ought to be something that people push back against. And they need to realize that this has been going on for decades. It's been going on through Republicans and Democrats being in charge in Washington. It really doesn't matter from that standpoint. So we really do have to fight this, bring up awareness of it. And maybe we can get people to start fighting this at the local level. That's really, it ultimately is there where they pump it into the water.

So if you can stop this at the local level, then you're on your way to getting control of individual health, taking it away from these public health dictators that really have established themselves in the last couple of years. It was great talking to you again, Ryan Christian. And it is the lastamericanvagabond.com is where you'll find these articles and a great interview. Take a look at that interview with Arnie Burkhart that we were talking about.

A lot to learn from that. Thank you so much, Ryan. Great talking to you. My pleasure, David. If I could just leave you with one thing in general, I think it's important. Maybe we could talk about this in the future. Maybe I'll have you on my show and so on about the idea of far more than just what we talked about today, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, all the different things that are just drenched.

Our world is drenched with these things, and they don't care about our health. And so we'll be covering this more. But that way, that includes glyphosate, what's in the injections, and so on. But Derek is going to be covering the fluoride trial, so make sure you keep track of that, and we'll be talking soon about that in general. And it's an honor to be on the show, David, so it's nice to have you. And thank you for being on top of this when everybody else is ignoring it. And know and we can throw into all that soup even things like 5g you know the health effects of 5g another example they don't care another example of how it comes back to

surveillance the surveillance is not even a question you know but there is a lot of evidence to show that the health effects of 5g and other things. But again, we got to have this because, you know, we got to beat the Chinese and that type of thing. It is absolutely, it's absolute insanity. All we can try to do is try to inform people about this. So thank you so much for what you do, Ryan. Appreciate it. TheLastAmericanVagabond.com.

That's where you can keep up with what's going on with the fluoride stuff, as well as many other issues. Thank you, Ryan. Appreciate it. Have a good day. All right, we're going to be right back, folks. Stay with us. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.

Check out the Jazz Channel at APSradio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind. Thank you. Thank you. making sense common again you're listening to the david knight show night show. All right, welcome back. And this is a comment. I didn't see this before Ryan was gone. This is from Krista Ripperger. Thank you very much for the tip. And I wrote, love you, Ryan. So glad to see you connecting with David. No one is reporting as thoroughly or objectively on the Middle East as Ryan and the last american vagabond no one reported on covid with as much source material as ryan uh the last american vagabond and dk should

connect regularly like cilenti yes we should uh and on rockfin guard goldsmith good to see you there guard and thank you for the tip i mean guard hosted the show for a week he gives me a tip he says thank you david and welcome back. Thanks for the excellent, excellent information and for talking with Ryan, whose work is consistently valuable and essential to the fight for truth and freedom. It's going to be a good year with people like you two men doing what you do and with Gard doing what he's doing

at Liberty Conspiracy and MRCTV as well. Thank you, Gard, for what you do. On Rockfin, Max B., thank you for the tip. He says, I follow both of you guys. And this was like an all-star game. Thank you. Yeah. He's got a lot of information there.

It's very important. And again, you know, we, we see these patterns that are there and, and regardless of, you know, how the fluoride affects your body or how the Trump shots affect your body.

We see these overriding principles that just tell us right from the bat right off the bat it's wrong that's wrong let's talk a little bit in the time that we got left we got about 12 minutes or so this is an interesting article by david um gornoski on gab.com and i've had this since before christmas but it is pretty much timeless it transcends the news cycle. I think that we have to think outside the government box, and we need to think about how we are going to transcend this and how we're going to transform our lives. And as part of this, and this article is titled, Peter Thiel was right about Adams. Adams. He quotes an Atlantic story. They said, quote, Peter Thiel is taking a break from

democracy. The article attempts to explain his recent renunciation of political donations as a result of being burned out by lack of return. Politicians provide his vision to move America towards growth, particularly in, as Thiel calls it, the world of atoms well again i think that um this is a good example you know uh elon musk and i agree with what elon musk said he said um you know the place where you're going to have uh really the least amount of effect is on federal elections i think you realize that more so than Peter Thiel. I think Elon Musk is the richest man in the world because he understands how to read politicians and how to get money from them for his projects.

And so he says, you know, George Soros realized that he could go to the local. And he could affect elections at the local level with district attorney and that type of thing, or even, you know, the state level with, uh, uh, state, um, uh, you know the state level with uh state um uh you know attorney generals attorneys general and um so he said you know that's a much more effective place to do it and i've uh talked to um many people who uh have pointed out you know in their state how they've had a lot more effect working on local laws they can never get anything done in Washington. That's what Peter Thiel has understood. But he said, David Gronowski says, the article misses the bigger point.

Thiel makes about the dangers of stagnation in favor of catering to the Atlantic audience's mirror-induced paranoias about Trump, fascism, and strange libertarian wealth. He says, um, the atom bomb is, um, you know, Teal is talking about that. The atom pro, uh, bomb project is a touted by Teal and his followers as one of the last greatest

things that the government did. Is it really? Well, is that really a great thing? I've come to look at that. And I think of it. When we talk about a just war, one of the things that's happening, and there's really Gaza conflict, and I said this from the very beginning

as I kept all of them talking about Pearl Harbor. I said, well, maybe they're trying to send us a message because it certainly does raise questions like Pearl Harbor did. How did this happen without any, you know, who was standing guard when all this stuff happened? And as I said before, you know, the fact that this happen without any, you know, who was standing guard when all this stuff happened? And as I said before, you know, the fact that FDR decided that, you know, they knew that the Japanese were going to do this, but they kept the warning from going out,

didn't warn anybody and actually kept the warning from going out. It still doesn't excuse what Japan did. They still struck first. And that's precisely what FDR was trying to do. And perhaps that was what Netanyahu was trying to do. Because, you know, a just war, and everybody understands this instinctively, you know, we have this kind of moral understanding that, you know, if somebody attacks you, you have a right to self-defense. And so that's part of a justified war. But another part of a justified war is to try to limit it, to try to end it as soon as possible, to try to stop the aggression, and also to protect civilian life.

And I look at it as we see this continuous bombing, this now asymmetric warfare. And now the asymmetric warfare is all on the side of Israel. And when I look at how the war ended, for years I bought the argument that, well, yeah, they bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki because it was going to be a bloody fight from island to island. And they were going order to save lives in terms of military conflict that is very antithetical to what western civilization when it was a civilization would say in terms of when it was a civilization that had ethics it's exactly contrary to a just war and this is one of the reasons why i think people are looking at what is happening in Gaza. It appears to be just, and this has been a key part of war since World War II. We went after civilian populations and continue to go after civilian populations.

We do preemptive strikes and all the rest of this stuff. So that is the world that we live in now. But again, what Peter Thiel is talking about was this was a great achievement to produce an atomic bomb. His narrative is that the victory in World War II further ennobled America's technological frontier spirit. Like 1920s cinema, post-World Wari era science fiction saw robots and flying cars just around the corner then teal laments beginning sometime in the 70s america's standard america

started to grow cynical about science and technology and we rested on our laurels to the detriment of wages and real growth well the reality of all this is that he sees us as being lazy and pacified. But I don't think that's the issue. I think the issue is that we begin to worship science. And I mean that very seriously. And just take a look at recently, Fauci, I'm Mr. Science. Worship me. Bow down.

Do everything that I say because science. I don't have to explain it to you. This is, again, when we're looking at Peter Thiel, he is somebody who is coming from a technocracy perspective. And it's one of the reasons why he and Elon Musk can develop things because they're very focused on a can-do attitude. And that's good, but it's not good when that replaces basic morality. And along that line, I want to play for you something that I looked at. I was spending some time just doing research and thinking over the break that I had. And I went back and I found a debate between Christopher Hitchens, who had just written God is Not Great, and with John Lennox, a mathematician in the UK.

I'm going to play you a brief excerpt between the two of them. So heaven has already watched almost 100% of its creation die off, often in very unpleasant, callous circumstances, with folded arms. And that's billions of years of geological time. often in very unpleasant, callous circumstances, with folded arms. And that's billions of years of geological time. Some people say the Homo sapiens has been around for 100,000 years, some for as long as a quarter of a million. No one says less than 100,000. Francis Collins, the great Christian believer who did the Human Genome Project,

says certainly 100,000. I'll take 100. Richard Dawkins thinks it's more. I'll take 100. What does it mean if we're divinely supervised and divinely created and looked out for? It means that for 98 or so thousand of those years, humans, homo sapiens, were being born, dying, half of them in childbirth, I would think, life expectancy maybe of 20 years, maybe 30, people dying essentially of their teeth out of hideous diseases, living in permanent fear. Where are the earthquakes coming from?

Where are the lightning strikes coming from? Why is all this? What are these diseases that hit us? We don't know about microbes, we have no idea. That's to say nothing about the fights with neighbouring tribes over women, over land, over meat, over subsistence, the torture, the violence, the cruelty that goes on. Well, what would be the best way of intervening

to try and redeem this rather bleak picture? What about having somebody tortured to death in an obscure part of the Middle East? That ought to cure it. Or, if you're a Muslim, what about getting an illiterate epileptic shepherd to start babbling and saying that he's been talking to an archangel? Or what about inventing the figure of Moses

in a mountain that's never yet been found by any geographer in Mount Sinai? I agree very much with Christopher Hitchens. It is repudiation of many of the evils that he claims have been done in the name of God. But I've learned to distinguish between the greatness of God and the inexcusable evil that has been done by those professing his name. And so I do not deduce that God is not great and that religion poisons everything. between the genius of Einstein and the abuse of his science to create weapons of mass destruction I might be tempted to say science is not great and technology poisons everything what is more as I look back at the evils of atheist regimes of the 20th century I I might also be tempted, ladies and gentlemen, to say atheism is not great.

It has poisoned everything. As it is, I hold that science shows some of the greatness of God. The famous physicist James Clark Maxwell, who discovered electromagnetic theory, inscribed above the door in his laboratory in Cambridge University the words, great are the works of the Lord studied by all who delight in them. Yet Christopher Hitchens says, thanks to the telescope and the microscope, religion no longer offers an explanation of anything. I find it impossible, I find it impossible as a scientist to take such a statement seriously, as if using a microscope and a Rembrandt painting could disprove the existence of Rembrandt himself. The idea that God and science are mutually exclusive explanations of the universe

is as wrong as saying that internal combustion and Henry Ford are mutually exclusive explanations of the automobile. They are complementary explanations. One explains how it works, the other why it exists. Far from science showing God is not great, as Christopher Hitchens suggests, the very opposite is the case. It was belief in God that motivated the advance of science in the 16th and 17th centuries. Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, Newton expected to find law in nature because they believed in a great lawgiver. Now, so often we hear the new atheists talk about faith and deprecating it. But I want to tell you that scientists are all people of faith, as Einstein saw. They believe that the universe is accessible to the human mind.

And physics cannot explain that for the simple reason that you can't do physics without believing that the universe is intelligible. Science is important, but it has its limitations. It cannot answer the questions of a child. What are we here for? What is the meaning of life? Nor can it tell us whether literature or art is good or bad. Hence an atheism that insists that science is the only way to truth diminishes human beings. This is very obvious to many of my Russian friends. We thought we could abolish God and retain a value for human beings, but we found we couldn't. Do away with the greatness of God, ladies and gentlemen,

and you can do away with the nobility of human beings endowed with all the potential of hearts and minds made in God's image. God is not only the great creator and judge, he's a God of grace and love. And the central claim of Christianity is this, that as an expression of his love, God himself became human. The word became flesh. Christ shows us as none other the greatness of God. He made unique claims to be the truth, to be the son of God and backed them up by a life and teaching without parallel. But his moral teaching was not his main message. His stated mission was to deal with the moral chasm that separates us humans from God by taking our sins on himself.

Ladies and gentlemen, we scientists cannot even tell you what energy is. So don't be surprised if I cannot completely explain to you the deepest mystery of our universe's history, the death and resurrection of Jesus. Yet just as we see the effect of and use energy without completely understanding it, what I do observe is the transformation, the peace, the hope that comes into the lives of ordinary men and women who learn to place their faith, their confidence, their trust in Christ as Savior and God. I see in them and experience in myself a transcendent sense of purpose that atheism does not have and a hope that atheism does not know. It is here, ladies and gentlemen,

I submit to you that the greatness of God is supremely manifest. Thank you. Yes, and we ran over a bit, but I wanted you to hear the end of it. Frankly, I got the time code wrong on that. It was longer than I thought. So I apologize for running over time, but we'll talk more about the conclusions of that at a later date. Thank you for joining us today.

Let me tell you the David Knight show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else?

You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com. That's a website.