The David Knight Show - 3Nov22 Lessons from CBDC Experiment; Cities PROHIBIT Travel Between Neighborhoods (for "Climate")
Episode Date: November 3, 2022OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESNigeria used as a “petri dish” to test CBD. Good news — it failed and had an unexpected result3:24Nigerians’ passion for cryptocurrencies doesn’t exten...d to the central bank.7:26But if they can’t push and incentivize people to use CBDC, they'll use force14:23The UK is preparing for national blackout — "Programme Yarrow" details emerge18:41US power grid has a MUCH GREATER threat than cyberattack from blackmailers or foreign enemies. And the threat is CERTAIN, based upon our own government's policies28:17Neither party is talking about the impossibility of growing our grid to be able to support 20 million EVs (on the road by 2025). Grid power capacity is actually shrinking as politicians sacrifice power plants to the green gods of climate mythology34:07There is no free lunch, and UK government is scheming the best ways to tax EV owners45:16Ford will kill in June the UK's Most-Owned car model that has survived over 9 generations. There's no interest in mass-produced AFFORDABLE cars as private ownership of transportation is set to be killed, not just internal combustion engines57:12Lotus: "Simplify and add lightness" no longer. Large, complicated, heavy, EV that's an SUV will be built in Wuhan, China for the lucky few who will be able to afford car ownership in the UK1:01:00Controversial plans to STOP CARS TRAVELING BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOODS in in the city of Canterbury come under fire for banning free movement.1:08:07Google’s Smart City Sidewalk Labs. The name says it all.1:11:07Smart Cities are all about concentrating population into massive urban centers and limiting mobility1:18:38Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight.gold, joins. The Fed raises interest rates by another big jump less than a week before the election. It's playing its own game1:29:37What’s going to happen to bitcoin in Nigeria?1:37:30A Congressman has introduced a bill to put US back on the gold standard — "Gold Standard Restoration Act". Is this good news or bad news?1:42:37With the election just a few days away, the collapse of Democrats in the polls is accelerating2:00:35Biden is inflating the lies — says cost of groceries is high because Putin is cutting off grain supplies.2:04:16Obama goes to Georgia to take on Herschel Walker.2:06:32Even The Atlantic laughs —Democrats keep falling for superstar losers - like "Beto" and Stacey Abrams2:14:54ONE MILLION votes just shifted in NY to Lee Zeldin as NYT and Democrats decide private Orthodox Jewish schools should be REQUIRED to push LGBT and CRT curriculum.2:17:28WHEN WILL WE UNDERSTAND — it’s as wrong to compel people to financially support schools that oppose their religion and their culture as it is to establish a state religion and compel financial support of it2:24:29Dixon hammers Whitmer over school closures that left kids are so far behind. We should stop lockdowns, but do we want these schools or should they be shut down for good?2:36:23The ugly truth about our societies — YouGov survey this week shows a lingering authoritarianism after medical martial law is paused.2:52:02Remember these scenes? Do you really want to go back to authoritarianism again?2:55:06Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds.
You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 3rd of November, year of our Lord 2022,
day 966 of the emergency of the medical martial law.
And it's kind of interesting as we look at the outrage against the essay about amnesty.
Can't we just move on, forget about all this?
And of course, many of us remember what has happened.
How many of us understand that it's not over?
They have paused this.
That is one of the key things about this,
one of the most deceptive things about this call for amnesty.
And they're moving on to new and other vaccines.
There's an RSV vaccine that Pfizer is pushing,
that GlaxoSmithKline is pushing,
and they're pushing it on pregnant women.
Can you say depopulation any better than that?
Stay with us. We're going to take a look, though, beginning with what they're doing to our transportation,
because that really does show the great reset.
That and some good news on CBDC.
We'll be right back.
Well, we do have, as I said, some good news on CBDC.
One of the places that the globalists thought they were going to get this through was Nigeria.
Why did they pick Nigeria?
Well, because it's a big country, large population, large economy.
The people there had embraced Bitcoin.
So they thought, you know, this will be a good place for us to start.
So they launched the eNaira, Africa's first central bank digital currency they did it last year and so you have uh as i pointed out many times i've shown you the map of how they have essentially
every country in the world is either planning or in the process of implementing and a handful of them have actually implemented CBDCs.
And every single one of those has flopped.
And this one failed big time.
Because we don't have to put up with this stuff.
There are more of us than there are of them, in spite of the vaccines and the efforts to
depopulate us, to get us to willingly not have kids, to physically impair us so that we can't have
kids even if we want to have kids.
But there's still far more of us than there are of them.
And this is what happened in Nigeria, a hopeful tale.
So they used Nigeria to run this through, as this article from Lou Rockwell says,
they used it as a Petri dish to test their plans for CBDCs
to enslave people all over the world, not just Africa,
but North America, Europe, and beyond.
This is one of the things I say.
They have got us so twisted up with this Project 1619
and racist and this and that, and tearing down all of civilization on the premise.
Well, it was somehow connected directly, indirectly, secondarily, tertiarily to slavery.
So we got to destroy anything that even had the most remote connection to slavery.
And I said, they're doing that because they don't want you to realize that you're slaves right now.
They don't want you to realize that they have a plan to slavery. And I said, they're doing that because they don't want you to realize that you're slaves right now. They don't want you to realize that they have a plan for slavery.
Unlike anything we've ever seen before in history.
Slavery has been pretty universal.
And,
uh,
we've had,
uh,
Thomas soul has pointed that out.
He says,
you know,
the reason that we even have the term slave,
it comes from Slav. They were the most commonly enslaved people, you know, the reason that we even have the term slave, it comes from
Slav. They were the most commonly enslaved people, white people, Slavic people. And all societies
have done it. The indigenous people of South America, the Indians here in America, everybody,
the Africans, everybody had slavery. They went and slaved other people.
But we're supposed to believe this is something unique to Western civilization,
so it can be a means of destroying Western civilization.
But what we will have if we don't stop this is a kind of universal slavery
that mankind has never seen before.
So they don't want you to see that.
They want you looking in the rearview mirror so you can't see what's coming at you
like a Mack truck. We were talked about that the other day um what julie wentz she said yeah we're so busy
looking at we can't see the forward i said yeah it's like the rear view mirror is the entire size
of your windshield you couldn't see around the rear view mirror anymore if you even tried because
they have mainstream media you know you got on the liberal
side it's all their crt stuff to erase history on the conservative side the big rearview mirror
is a 2020 election that trump and all these people who are making so much money off of this with the
conservative media they want you just looking back at the 2020 election nothing else don't look at
what's coming at you with a cbdc and other things like
that so anyway so what happened as i put it in well it was a massive failure says lou rockwell.com
according to bloomberg only one out of every 200 nigerians use the e naira That's one half of 1%. One half of 1% of the people use it.
That's even after the government implemented discounts
and incentives and desperate measures to increase adoption.
Well, that's good. My concern is
that as we saw with the vaccines,
people in Africa were far more skeptical of these things
than people were in North America and in Europe.
Most of the people here bought it hook, line, and sinker.
The black population here was more skeptical
because they had seen how they had been used
with the Tuskegee experiment, things like that.
And so their death rates from all different types of things have not gone up as much as
it has for the rest of the population because they were more skeptical of this.
But in Africa, they were very skeptical of this.
In Africa, when Bill Gates sends or the World Health Organization, his surrogate sends around
crews to vaccinate people in many cases
they get physically attacked and so they may be a lot more skeptical and a lot
wiser about this because they see it as a foreign invasion we think this is
coming from us and actually it is coming from our government our government is
has become the seat of Satan around the world.
We push out the degeneracy. We push out the vaccines. We push out the war.
We push out the debt. We push out all of this stuff.
We've become the cesspool Washington, DC quite literally. Now they,
they're going to remove laws regarding public
urination while they remove penalties for serious crimes,
violent crimes, beatings, carjackings, all the rest of this stuff.
Take that stuff down and let people urinate in public.
Because why?
Because Washington, D.C. is the toilet of the world.
And we're pumping out this filth everywhere.
Anyway, Nigeria's one had one of the highest Bitcoin adoption rates in the world,
ranking number 11 of all the different countries.
So that's one of the reasons why this really surprised the elites.
They thought, well, you know, we can go here.
They got one of the bigger economies.
They're into Bitcoin.
That should be good.
And, you know, we've had this discussion, you know,
is that the dangerous thing about Bitcoin?
Is Bitcoin being used to accustom us to the CBDC?
Well, the take of this article, and I think they're right,
is that it actually worked the other way around.
When people were given CBDC and there's a lot of talk and promotion of it,
they looked at it and said, yeah, yeah, I could do digital currency, but I think I'd
rather have the one that is private, that isn't being traced and all the rest of the
stuff.
And so the Bitcoin usage, which was already high, went up even higher because people got
familiar with it.
And I said, eh, that's the better one over there.
It can't just be inflated arbitrarily.
They just can't add new Bitcoins
like they do the central bank digital currency.
CBDC is still going to be a fiat currency.
They'll still just add it at will.
So anyway,
Bitcoin's ability to bypass the government's capital controls,
which restrict the use of foreign currencies,
sending and receiving money from abroad,
all of that was a big draw for Nigerians.
A long history of rampant currency debasement in Nigeria, including six devaluations in just recent years,
also helped to spur the adoption of Bitcoin, which is totally resistant to inflation. The elites have miscalculated.
They figured that Nigerians wouldn't be able to differentiate
between Bitcoin and the e-Naira because, you know,
they're both currencies and they're both digital.
The Bloomberg article admitted, quote,
Nigerians' passion for cryptocurrencies doesn't extend
to the central bank offering.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18 plus gamblingcare.ie.
They said Nigerians view the e-Naira as a symbol of distrust in the ruling elite.
And the people view the government as, quote, hostile to them.
And therefore, they have no interest in anything the government introduces.
And if we don't wake up to what's going on,
we have to understand in every single country,
and it doesn't matter what the political party is,
they can call themselves liberal, conservative,
they can call themselves a libertarian,
which in many other countries,
they call that the Liberal Party.
In Australia, for example, the Liberal Party had been libertarian,
but it doesn't matter.
That's where Gladys Berejiklian was.
She was one of the worst, most authoritarian leaders in the world
over all this, the Libertarian Party of Australia.
So it doesn't really matter what they say their political philosophy is.
They were all on the same page.
And every single country, regardless of what their professed political ideology was,
they were at war with their own people.
Difference is the Nigerians understand this already.
We think still that the government's on our side,
or at least our political party that we favor. We've got at least one
party that we think is on our side. They're both
against you. You better wake up.
It's time to wake up.
Both of these parties
are allied against you. Look at what they're doing.
Look at what they're not doing.
They're not removing the executive orders.
They're not talking about CBDC.
They may complain and carp about who was worse about the lockdown.
That's all you're going to get from these people.
They may say, well, we don't want to have vaccine mandates,
but the vaccines are good.
You should take them.
I take mine.
Yeah, right.
Anyway, so they're going to say the flop of the CBDCs in Nigeria is an encouraging development.
It also reveals an outcome that was probably the opposite of what the elites desired,
and that is increased adoption of Bitcoin.
If the current fiat system is not viable, then CBDCs are even less viable,
as they enable the government to engage in even more debasement of the currency.
Would a CBDC have saved the Zimbabwe dollar? No.
Or the Venezuelan Bolivar? No.
The Argentine peso? No.
The Lebanese lira? No.
Of course not.
CBDCs are going to introduce and familiarize people with using digital currency.
So rather than Bitcoin being used to train people for CBDC,
it could be the other way around.
When they push the CBDC out there, people say, yeah, digital currency,
I think I'll go with the one that can't be manipulated,
that can't be tracked as easily.
The one that is not going to be removed as easily.
It's only a matter of time before they discover Bitcoin.
Both are digital.
Both facilitate fast payments from a mobile phone.
Governments can and will create as much CBD currency units as they wish.
But with Bitcoin, there can never be more than 21 million.
CBDCs are centralized. Bitcoin is decentralized. Governments can censor transactions and freeze,
sanction, and confiscate CBDC units whenever they want. Bitcoin is censorship resistant, resistant, not censorship proof. There is no
privacy with CBDCs. However, with Bitcoin, if you take specific steps, it is possible to maintain
reasonable privacy. But again, I still say that if you look at cash and if you look at metals, for example,
I think they are superior in terms of privacy, in terms of trackability,
in terms of the rest of this stuff.
Because it is very easy for them to shut down the processing of transactions
with Bitcoin just by monitoring energy usage.
And that's going to be the way they're going to come after it.
They will, if they can't push this stuff and incentivize people, they'll get a certain
percentage of people who will jump on it, just like they do with the vaccine.
You know, a few clueless idiots who are looking for the latest fad, the newest thing, will
jump in without doing any due diligence and go ahead and accept it.
Other people will be more reluctant.
Well, I don't know.
I don't know.
Well, here's some incentives.
How about, okay, well, you've got me.
Okay.
You got a lottery there.
I could win a million dollars if I take a vaccine.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Or you could die or you could wind up crippled for the rest of your life.
Well, let's do it.
And then you'll have the coercion aspect.
And then you will have the coercion aspect, and then you will have the real mandates,
where they come in and they raid the places
where they are doing the processing,
where they're mining the currency,
processing the transactions,
because it'll be very, very, very easy to spot them.
And that's the fourth leg of what Biden has done
with these
CBDCs. Remember, four different aspects. One of them to redesign the entire financial system around
this. Redesign the entire financial system. That's job number one. He gave that to the
Treasury Department, the comptroller of the currency and other things. But it was this
every government bureaucracy, all of them under the executive branch,
we're all given a task to push through the CBDC stuff. Would it have been interesting if Trump
had been so focused on really draining the swamp, right? Or any other, one of the things that he
talked about. Can you imagine if like Biden has done with CBDC. If Trump had organized and pushed out something, whatever, pick it,
pick a topic, pick an issue, and put that in there
and run that out with a whole government focus on it.
No, he didn't, because he was just there to deceive you.
Part of the elite.
Anyway, going back to this, one leg of it is to completely redesign the financial system.
The second one is how are they going to enforce it
with the Department of Justice, with the IRS, that type of thing.
They have to have some people who are going to write the crypto code
and take care of the security issues.
And then the fourth one is all about environmentalism,
and that's going to be their justification
for shutting down,
physically shutting down SWAT team raids onto the miners and all the rest of this stuff.
Any Bitcoin, any competing cryptocurrency. Because you know, you can't be using that kind
of energy. We'll destroy the planet. Everybody will die. And so we're going to have to shut you
down. Our CBDC does not use that much energy, they'll
say, whether it's true or not. But CBDCs make an inferior form of money even worse. At the same
time, it could be an excellent Trojan horse for Bitcoin, as long as it lasts. But still, I would.
We're going to have Tony on today. We'll talk about this. We've got some other issues, of course.
Interest rates raised again yesterday 75 basis
points three quarters of a percent interest and they're not anywhere close to their goal and
they're going to continue with it but i find it interesting that they do it the wednesday before
tuesday election um so and i remember the last time when they did this, if you go back and look at the interest rates charted out over time, when they created the bubble that burst in 2008, what they did was
they took the interest rates down and they kept them basically at zero for quite a while.
And then at one point they started going up and it's just like a regular stair step. If you go
back and look at the interest rates, you'll see that every time, you know, it's like once a quarter or whatever the interval was, they would go up 25 basis points.
It was a quarter of a percent.
And they did it, you know, one after the other, regularly.
And they did it until they burst the bubble.
Now they're doing it, but they're doing it at three times the rate that they did it last time.
So we'll see what happens.
They waited way too long to do it.
That's not going to have any effect really on the inflation, I don't think.
But it is going to kill the economy in many different ways,
and people are feeling it already.
That's one of the reasons why the Democrat support is collapsing.
We'll talk about that when we get to the elections.
The UK has tested their blackout emergency plans, says
The Guardian. The Guardian was given a document from
a government source that was marked official and sensitive.
Because everything's classified now, right?
Five I's. The US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
Oh yeah, we Zealand. Oh yeah.
We got to classify everything operates under the idea of a national security.
And we got to hide everything.
We got to hide Seth Rich's laptop for 66 years.
We got to hide the Pfizer test data for 75 years and on and on.
Everything is classified.
Everything is secret hidden.
The elections are secret and pelosi's cameras are
secret and hidden you know all this stuff uh janna carnaval thank you very much for that i appreciate
that she says thank you for your reporting the truth your show is one of the few i faithfully
watch to get factual info well thank you very much and thank you for the support i appreciate that
janna uh mark uh m228 first japan now niger. That's another nail in the CBDC coffin. Yes, yes.
And there's been some other places as well, some smaller countries. But now let's take a look at
what's going on with the energy stuff. Because the energy is a nail in our coffin. And it is going to
be one of the things that they use to restrict any options outside of CBDC,
but also to restrict our movements.
Because this is the next kind, the next form of lockdown.
We're going to have to lock you down because of energy use.
Because we'll all die.
I mean, it's like the COVID thing, right?
Not to lock you down because you're going to use too much energy
if you move around.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football.
The excitement,
the roar,
and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day
of the festival,
we're giving new members
money back as a free sports bet
up to 10 euro
if your horse loses
on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate
the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie.
They're always looking for ways to imprison us.
Remember, lockdown was the terminology used in prisons.
Oh, they're getting kind of disorderly.
Let's lock everything down.
All right, everybody get in your cell and just stay there, right?
Then they do it in schools then they do it in society after they've accustomed a lot of kids to that in the government training seminaries the british government has war-gamed
emergency plans to cope with energy blackouts lasting up to seven days in the event of a national power outage.
Seven days?
Well, then what happens on day eight?
On the eighth day, it all just melts down.
We had power.
We lost power one time for about a week.
In North Carolina, we had our businesses, our stores were in, um, you know, and Carrie and
Raleigh and Durham and Chapel Hill and places like that. But, but we lived way out in the woods
and there was, um, hurricane Fran, uh, came through and, you know, Karen and I didn't take
it seriously because we'd been through a lot of hurricanes in Florida. I'd grown up in Florida
and it's like, oh, come on. You're talking, we're so far inland
here in Raleigh, there isn't any way that this is going to bother us at all. And you know, by the
time it gets over that much land, it's really going to peter out. Well, the winds were only 75
miles an hour and it really wasn't a hurricane anymore. Officially, I don't think at that level,
but it came with so much rain. It was unbelievable how much rain there was.
And the soil there was clay, and there were a lot of trees.
And unlike Florida, where you have sandy soil and it just soaks it up like a sponge,
the clay soil, once it got really wet and everything,
you started having trees with a 75-mile-an-hour wind wind and that much water it started blowing trees over left and right and you had trees there that were over a century
old that were getting blown down in historic areas in raleigh and that type of thing where we were
uh out there we had a lot of trees we lost over three dozen trees and six acres we had
some of them so big we couldn't cut them up they just
stayed there um and they toppled over from the root you know the root ball was still attached
and the worst thing about it was as a big one starts to topple over it just created domino
effect because the rest of them were getting close to where they could do that as well
and um so it was pretty devastating well karen and and I were, you know, she had the kids,
and I was meeting with some people from the Libertarian Party at the time.
We weren't concerned about it at all, and then all of a sudden,
I am at this, we're getting pizza or whatever and talking,
and all of a sudden the lights are blinking and everything.
It's like, well, I guess I better be going home,
and so I started to go home, and all the traffic lights are out,
and it's like, oh, this is getting pretty bad.
By the time we made the half hour trip, uh, and Karen was, um, you know, on her own with
the two babies in the car seats and, uh, my mom who was in a wheelchair and, um, they'd
gone to, uh, to something, I forget what it was, but, uh, she had a similar experience.
We both got home about the same time and all the ways home were blocked except for
one, and we had to go around this long, secure this route to get home.
And with all these trees falling, it took out all the power lines everywhere.
And we were stuck there because we were all, because we were remote, we were the
last on the list to get the power restored.
And so we were out of power for about a week and the weather was miserable.
Uh, we had no air conditioning and it got unseasonably hot.
Um, so you don't want to be without power.
Uh, at least we weren't in a big city where people are going to start writing.
Right.
And we know what that's going to look like.
The lights go out.
Yeah.
It's Christmas time.
Let's knock over the stores, that type of thing.
It's going to get very, very, very dangerous in the big cities.
You're not just going to be uncomfortable because there's no air conditioning.
So according to documents marked official and sensitive,
seen by The Guardian, they said a reasonable worst-case scenario,
all sectors, including transport, food food and water supply communications and energy could be
quote severely disrupted for up to a week so the report says a cross-government blueprint
was first drawn up in 2021 this is not being done because they're of the nato sanctions with this
ukraine situation this was done before.
Well, was it just due diligence and planning for a worst case scenario?
Well, it could be.
Could be that this is what they're planning to do.
Government insiders reportedly admitted that the plan dubbed Program Yarrow.
I have no idea. I should have looked that up.
I have no idea what Yarrow, I have no idea, I should have looked that up, I have no idea what Yarrow is,
had taken on new urgency at the time of a worsening energy crisis.
They said the government doesn't want any publicity on Yarrow,
as they don't want it to be seen as linked to Ukraine, their policy,
or to the energy supply, their policy,
and the cost of living, their policy and the cost of living their policy.
Uh, one of the sources told the guardian, but we need to think about
how we can help people in advance.
Or they need to think in advance about how they're going to take us to zero,
zero, everything, right?
How did you do that?
How do you do that?
How do you get everybody to zero?
Well, we've been told by Fauci, you do it from the inside.
You do it with disruption and chaos, and you do it iteratively, right?
So that's what they're looking at.
Inside, disruption, iterative.
So we are vulnerable as a country,
as a direct consequence of decades of failed conservative energy policy, says the opposition climate secretary.
We have a climate secretary, shadow climate secretary, doesn't it?
And so, you know, yeah, the conservatives have done that.
He's telling the truth about them.
It is their failed energy policy, but guess what?
The labor policy, the green party policy would be even worse and even faster.
That's what I mean.
They're both going in the same direction.
The difference is what speed you're going to drive off, drive us off the cliff.
Thelma and Louise, we're kind of like Brad Pitt in the back seat.
We couldn't get out.
Anyway, you could also cover an attack on undersea power cables,
you know, like what just happened with the undersea Nord Stream pipeline.
Yeah, you could blow up the cables as well.
Pretty easy to do.
Or you could just blow up the entire economy with sanctions.
You could blow up the entire economy with prohibitions of production of fuel.
You could blow up the entire economy with prohibitions against internal combustion engines,
and that's what I'm going to talk about here.
That's really as much of a risk, if not more so,
than our infrastructure being hacked by cyber attacks. Cause you know,
we've had these cyber attacks.
We've seen some of them,
the colonial pipeline,
uh,
they didn't hack the pipeline itself.
They didn't actually shut down the flow of anything.
What they did,
all they had to do was to hack the accounting system.
Well,
if I can't keep track of who I'm buying and selling to, I'm going to have to just
stop.
You know, they didn't have to actually physically do anything to blow up the pipeline or to
shut off any valves or anything like that.
Just shut down the accounting system by hacking the computers.
So program Yarrow prepares for a situation where power is unavailable without any warning to all premises without backup generators during winter.
It envisages that 60% of electricity demand will be met between day two and day seven when households and businesses will be given intermittent access to
ration supplies to their board so it gets cut off the first day and then from day two through the
rest of the week about 60 power each day so they ran a simulation well i think they ought to call
it dark winter don't you oh that's right they already did that when they started kicking this
thing off they did dark winter even before they did nine 11, two months before they did it.
Then they did a false flag the week after.
Then they put out their regulations to say, do all this stuff at the state level that
they did last year.
And then they practiced it every year for 20 years.
So yeah, they could just do it with sanctions.
Whatever.
Remember it was Madeline Albright who admitted that sanctions killed a half a million
kids and then even worse she said it was worth it well you know they could kill a lot of people
they could kill our economy they could kill literally kill people with their sanctions
against the energy grid but there is another threat to the energy grid. Epic Times says the
surprising threat to the U.S. power grid that could plunge the country into darkness, dark winter,
you know. And, you know, it could be hackers from Russia or China, that type of thing. And they even
talk about in this article, they say, well, you know, going back to 2018, the government admitted that, or began talking about the fact, Homeland Security said in 2018, Russian hackers had hijacked control rooms of various electric utilities.
Well, how'd they know it was Russian?
Well, we know it was Russian because Homeland Security told us, or the FBI told us.
Just like we know exactly what happened in the Pelosi house
because the FBI told us.
So now you can trust them.
One of the reasons that they hate Julian Assange so much
is because he put out there Vault 7.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet
up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
Initially, it was the manual.
He didn't put out the code.
But then some other people leaked the code.
And so then WikiLeaks posted the code to Vault 7.
Vault 7 is the program that they use to impersonate anybody.
So the CIA has a program called Vault 7.
Using that, they can make it look like they are Russia or China or Iran
or anybody, anybody.
And I remember interviewing John McAfee
as well as the former global head of the nsa
uh william benny both of them said you can't tell who's doing this we have programs to hide
blade mcafee put it was he said uh uh if it looks like it was Russians, it was probably anybody but the Russians.
So you get into those situations like, well, maybe I don't even need to try to hide anything because, you know, if it looks like it's me, people realize that it's not me because it's the CIA doing this.
So that's one thing that could be alarming.
I mean, it could be an actual kinetic attack on our infrastructure, like blowing up power lines and blowing up pipelines and things like that.
Uh, it could be a cyber attack or it could just be government policy.
It could be sanctions.
It could be prohibitions.
It could be shutting down the power grid and overburdening it.
And that's really the key thing.
The banning of the internal combustion engine, along with pushing everybody to an electric
vehicle that has to be charged off of the grid.
You know, we can't have anything that has a fuel cell or generates electricity that
way either.
Electric vehicles for no emissions, but they must be charged off the grid while we shut
the grid down with the inputs.
And so this article is very interesting in terms of going over what precisely is happening.
U.S. power grid for electric grid involves a huge network of transmission
lines, a great deal of complexity, which makes it unbelievably vulnerable. And we've been saying
this for the longest time as we talk about prepping. You know, we have very, very long supply
lines. We have a very, very, very complicated infrastructure. Even the power generation is a
very, very complicated infrastructure,
which means it's very vulnerable to a lot of different things. The power grid in the United States is broken down into just three. You have the Eastern grid, the Western grid, and you got
Texas, ERCOT, the electric reliability is what that. Um, I forget what the COT stands for.
We've already seen how that works out when I was doing shows by candlelight and broadcasting it
over the cell phone thing, because we had no power. Then the middle of the show, one of the
pipes burst. So everybody's running around while I'm doing the show, trying to mop up,
turn off the water and mop it up anyway.
Um,
yeah,
the Texas grid,
uh,
the Eastern grid is the largest,
uh,
they can operate independent of each other,
but they're also connected.
And so you can imagine as a point out what happens in LA or New York.
If all the power goes down,
it will be total bedlam,
total bedlam, like an insane asylum.
Currently, there are 2.5 million electric vehicles in the U.S.
Four in five owners charge their vehicles overnight.
So by 2025, the U.S. will have more than 20 million EVs on its roads.
Okay, about 10 times as many as you've got right now.
Well, it's eight, eight times.
By 2030, according to Bloomberg,
more than half of the car sales will be electric.
I'd say it's probably going to be more than that
if they're going to ban the manufacture of internal combustion engines.
And of course, all the automobile manufacturers
are fully on board with this
because they want to play ball with the government. They're there for their ESG
brownie points because they know that in the end, there are going to be no private vehicles.
They're not interested in a mass market anymore. And they want to be mobility companies,
which means that they want to rent you your transportation by the ride.
Rent it by the ride.
Be like Uber, you know.
And so for that, they need the government's approval and partnership.
And so their business model is to make sure they do everything to satisfy the government
so they can be one of the two or three car companies
that are going to be renting you transportation by the ride.
That's how this is breaking down.
The strain is increasing and power grids are ill-equipped to shoulder the load.
If Bloomberg's projection proves to be correct, then researchers say it would take 5.4 gigawatts of energy storage to charge EVs.
Or as Doc would say to Marty, gigawatts, Marty.
Gigawatts. gigawatts.
To put that in perspective,
one nuclear power plant produces one gigawatt of energy,
and you're going to need five and a half times that.
So you're going to have to add five and a half nuclear plants
in order to get there by 2030.
You're going to have to add five and a half nuclear plants.
Are they planning to do that?
Are they planning to increase the capacity?
Because right now we have, because why nuclear power plants?
Well, because that's the only thing they haven't invented a reason yet to shut down.
They got no emissions, they say.
Well, they do emit radiation from time to time if you are monitoring them.
But none of this carbon dioxide stuff.
Oh, yeah.
Radiation, that's okay.
Carbon dioxide, no, we don't want that.
Plants might breathe that in and grow or something.
So they're supposedly emission-free.
And right now we're going to kick the can down the road about what we do with nuclear waste
because we really don't care about that, right?
But they're not planning.
Right now, we have 55 nuclear power plants.
They're going to need to add five and a half.
They're going to have to increase it by 10% of what it is right now.
They're not planning on doing that.
They're not doing it right now. I mean, they'd be hard-pressed probably after all the corruption and slowdowns and supply chain issues and all the rest of the stuff that we have because of our hyper-politicized economy.
They'd be hard-pressed if they started already to get this done in seven years, to increase the nuclear power plants by 10%.
But they haven't even planned to do that.
Haven't even talked about doing it.
There's no way that's going to happen.
So what would happen if, say, the power grid was to fail
and EV crazed California?
To answer that question, we need only rewind a few months.
This past summer, they were plagued by scorching hot temperatures.
The Golden State Power Grid came incredibly close to collapsing.
It survived, but only just.
And the Texas Power Grid had the same problem this last summer.
It was really strained and survived, but only just.
And, of course, it did fail in the winter
when they had an unexpectedly cold winter.
So they're not building,
they're not even planning anything to fill in the gap.
The renewables can't handle it.
They don't have any way to store the power for the grid.
And so there is no solution. And while they're doing that, they're deconst to store the power for the grid. And, uh, so there is no solution.
And while they're doing that,
they're deconstructing the power plants that are oil and coal and natural
gas.
So as they're putting big burdens on,
or they're cutting down the input into the,
into the grid,
because why?
Because we has met the enemy and they is us.
They is us. They is the U.S. government. It is our own politicians who are our own enemies
and in every other country. They're the ones who are trying to destroy
our way of life. Take us to zero. Everything, zero.
The grid will be tested again with California's desire to push the
sales of EV. The next test could prove to be an unmitigated disaster.
Energy is a finite resource, a fact that seems to be lost on so many EV enthusiasts.
As a matter of fact, we don't really have to worry about this.
I mean, we got Booty Gay on this, right?
He's on it.
He's on the job.
He's going to have the infrastructure all figured out he's gonna build
the charging stations he's gonna replace all these fossil fuel quote-unquote things that
they're taking offline he's gonna replace them with something something uh he understands what's
going on he's very smart no no truth is nation's power grid is already on its last legs.
A sobering piece from Smithsonian Magazine,
a guy who is an electrical engineering professor at the University of Minnesota,
explained the many ways in which the country's power grid,
he said the most complex one that has ever been assembled, could fail.
The grid, he wrote, underpins our economy, our quality of life, our society.
Without it, society will be brought to a screeching halt.
Crime will rise.
Lives will be lost.
Chaos will reign supreme.
Yeah, yeah, we do it from the inside.
We do it with chaos and we do it iteratively.
Yeah, you'll have Lord Fauci and his lockdowns.
You have one of these weirdo bugs.
They just keep coming back and never going away.
Anyway, I don't know what these things are.
We've had a plague of, and again, I don't know what these things are.
They don't bite or anything, but they sure are a nuisance.
And then, uh, ladybugs, which are actually the Asian beetles and they actually do bite
here.
And two of these things have been swarming lately.
And I don't know where these things keep coming from anyway.
Uh, yeah, they want to have locked down again.
They want to have martial law.
They want to have passports. They want to have martial law. They want to have passports.
They want to have curfews.
And they'll be able to get all this stuff with the energy angle.
They're going to have to shut down the energy grid because they're going to kill the planet if they don't do it.
And then they're going to have to ration and control your life.
It's a perfect excuse.
That's what I say.
You know, if they stop all medicine, they say, we've got a respiratory illness here, but we're going to stop all treatments except the ones that make it worse. And the only way that
you're going to get out of your lockdown, you know, we're going to isolate everybody. The only
way you're going to get out is if you take our vaccine, you're going to have to have a passport
so we can track you and surveil you and control you. And that's what they're going to do with
the energy stuff. By 2025, according to the American Society for Civil Engineers,
the inability of the U.S. to maintain its many power lines will cost the country dearly,
about $130 billion to be exact.
EVs, so often hailed as the best thing since sliced bread,
come with a lot of big problems.
Currently in the U.S., 21 EVs per public charging port. Well, that's pretty bad
considering how long it takes, right? Even the fast ones are going to take, you know, 20, 30
minutes or something to charge. And you got 21 of them per port. Anyway, by by 2030 in order to keep up with the EV purchasing trends that are going to be mandated, uh, the U S must install almost 500 charging ports every day for the next eight years.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Booty gaze.
Got it.
Doesn't he?
And he's going to be able to do that.
You're going to have to add to keep up to, keep up so it doesn't get worse than it is now.
You're going to have to add 500 charging ports every day for the next eight years.
Even if the United States somehow managed to install enough of these,
the grid simply isn't strong enough to support the battery-related demands.
This is a point that needs to be emphasized repeatedly, unapologetically.
Yes, state-sponsored hackers could be a threat.
But state-sponsored EV initiatives aren't exactly harmless.
I kind of sound apologetic about that, the Epoch Times.
No, it's actually much worse than that
and so when we come back we're going to take a look at what they're doing in the uk because that
is a glimpse into at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football
the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro.
If your horse loses on a selected race,
that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie Our future, unfortunately.
Stay with us.
The Common Man.
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created Common Past to track and control us.
Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
TheDavidKnightShow.com
So, the whole thing is really kind of, come on in, come on in.
It's all free.
It's all free.
Well, guess what?
There's no free lunch.
And just like we saw with the internet in the late 1990s and the 2000s.
Oh yeah.
Come on in.
The internet's just the wild west.
Everything is free, free, free, free, free to use my service, free to say anything that you want to do.
Right.
Anything that you want to say.
We had free speech. We had free access. Free to use my service. Free to say anything that you want to do, right? Or anything that you want to say.
We had free speech.
We had free access.
And then all of a sudden you realize that this has become a walled garden.
They've shut the gates.
They're turning on the gas.
And if you go back and you look at it, you go, oh, well, you know, back in the 1960s, early 1960s,
you had a psychologist at DARPA that designed this whole thing.
And then when it became practical in the 1990s, you had DARPA and you had the CIA with their executives setting on the venture capital boards of the people who were going
to be the competitors and duke it out to see who's going to be the rulers of the internet.
And they were getting funded by these venture capital boards and had the
intelligence community on it.
And you see that at the same time, the CIA even went public with that.
Publicly created a venture capital firm called In-Q-Tel and created
geospatial intelligence, what has been and remains the fastest growing area of intelligence.
They don't talk about that.
It's just fascinating to me how none of these intelligence experts on Fox News,
people like Catherine Herridge who left because they were only paying her a million dollars.
She's like, can you believe this?
I mean, Megyn Kelly's got 25 and I'm only getting a million.
I'm out of here.
I get no respect around here.
I'm the Rodney Dangerfield of the CIA shills.
So she left and got paid more money.
I think an NBC, uh, MSNBC, uh, you know, but they never talk and they
never use the term geospatial intelligence because they don't
want you to know what's going on.
Anyway, back to this, um um as the point being that they
they give you all this free stuff and to direct you into something where they can then remove all
that and that's what's happening with the electric cars now everything's been free free free free
free we're even going to give you subsidies if you buy the electric cars yes i know they're
expensive so we're going to give you some subsidies, but you will be exempt from all taxation.
How about that?
You won't have to pay for your fuel.
You can charge it.
We won't charge any surcharges.
Well, guess what?
All of that is coming to a screeching halt.
You're going to get charged by the mile,
which is exactly why they want electric cars that charge off the grid
because they can say, well, we got to pay for the roads somehow.
And you're not going somewhere to pump up with petrol or with diesel
or with hydrogen or with anything else.
We could tax you at that point if you're going somewhere to pump it up.
But since you could charge this thing anywhere, we have to charge you by the mile, which means
we got to put a black box in your car to track you.
You know, just like the vaccine and the vaccine passport, it always goes back to a premise.
They have to force you into something where I know it's an invasion of your privacy, but we just have to do it.
This is the only possible solution.
And this solution has to come with something that has surveillance attached to it.
So Bill Gardanas, thank you very much.
I appreciate the tip on Rockfin.
Thank you very much. so taxes on electric cars and van owners in the UK
could begin as soon as 2025
even sooner they say
one of the plans being considered by the Chancellor of the Exchequer
to be a part of his autumn statement
according to reports over the weekend
the move could bring in a car tax as vehicle excise duty is commonly
known for pure electric vehicles, which are currently exempt from any taxes. Jeremy Hunt,
the Davos darling, is said to be considering how and when to introduce a taxation for the greenest
models on the road in order to plug the 35 billion pound revenue
black hole that will be created when more drivers switch to electric cars by the end of the decade.
So they're not paying for the petrol and the diesel taxes anymore. So how are we going to
get that money? Well, when everybody's driving an electric car, we'll have to find a way to do it.
This is how they're going to do it. With a 2030 UK deadline for the sale of new petrol and diesel cars,
very much on the horizon.
And remember, I told you this over the past few years.
They came out and said, well, they did it from the inside
and they did it iteratively.
And they said, we're going to disrupt you.
We're going to create chaos.
We're going to create prohibitions.
But we're not going to ban internal combustion engines just yet. We
will, we will, we'll do it in 2050. And people are like, they're going to ban cars? Really? Whoa.
And just like good King Hezekiah, they said, well, at least it'll happen to my kids and not to me.
Right. And then the barbarians at the gate start coming closer and closer.
And you find out it's going to happen in your lifetime
because they went from 2050 to 2045 to 2040 to 2035.
And then 2030, the magic date, 2030, we're going to ban them.
I always said, you know, I said, especially when they dropped down 2035.
I said, no, you know, they're going to 2030.
They got to be there at 2030. That's when they're going to have 2035. I said, no, you know they're going to 2030. They've got to be there at 2030.
That's when they're going to have their dystopian plans in effect, they say.
So they've got a 2030 deadline to ban all internal combustion engines.
And so only allow battery vehicles charging off the grid.
Right now, battery cars are currently avoiding both fuel duty and vehicle excise duty
road taxation bills for ev drivers could be introduced within the next three years yeah
everything is free until the hammer falls and they're they've forged the hammer they're going
to drop it in a couple of years uh road taxation currently is based on a car's exhaust emissions.
And so the zero emission electric vehicles are getting a free ride.
And they're exempt from those annual charges.
So I don't know if they actually, in the UK,
if you have to go and they actually test your emissions
or if they just go by what the manufacturer said it got with city and highway,
that type of thing, what we call in the U.S. the EPA figures.
The Whitehall sources told the paper that everyone knows electric vehicles
will have to be subject to road tax.
You knew that, didn't you?
Well, no, I think a lot of people didn't really realize that.
They'll have to be subject to a road tax at some point. Treasury faces a difficult decision of
when to implement it and how without disincentivizing uptake of cleaner vehicles. In other words,
how are we going to deceive people into thinking they got a free ride when all along we know we're
going to stab them in the back? You know, It's just like the former CEO of Uber saying,
you know, the reason our rides are expensive
is because of that other dude in the car,
and we're going to get rid of that other dude in the car.
Hey, you want to work for Uber?
While trying to meet these strict air pollution reduction targets,
so we've got to get everybody into the green cars,
and we've got to shut down and ban these other cars.
We don't want them to know that they're going to be charged and charged more,
and they will have less freedom and mobility.
We don't want them to know that.
Shh, don't tell them that.
We know that's going to happen.
We know it's going to happen.
They can't know.
And so zero private cars.
That's their goal.
That was a goal from the very first Earth Day back in 1970.
I played that for you a few weeks ago, some clips from that.
And they're out there, these hippies saying, man, private cars.
Well, that's always been the goal, along with depopulation,
along with authoritarian control of whatever population remains.
The Transport Committee recommended
in February that electric vehicle owners should
pay a road pricing scheme.
This would charge drivers
per trip.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance
to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet
up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie Based on the distance that they travel. 14th of March, bet within 48 hours of race, main market, excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply, bet responsibly, 18 plus gambling care.
Dot E based on the distance that they travel.
And they said,
this is one of the best fiscal changes we could make.
Yeah.
I'm going to make them a lot of money and it's going to shut down everybody's
ability to move about.
Um,
huge imbalance regionally, by the way, in the charging infrastructure. I was talking about
how in the U.S., in order for us to follow this goal and get the electric vehicles up here in the
U.S., they've got to build for the next eight years. 500 charging ports have to be added per day, per day.
Well, right now, if you look at what is happening in the UK,
they said, when we look at these charging stations,
they don't seem to be evenly distributed, right?
It seems like the politicians have put them all around Westminster,
you know, where the government is.
It's like putting them around the Capitol in the US. It looks like all the charging stations are in Washington, D.C. How's that?
Because they're the ones who are planning your future, and their plans for your future are that
you aren't going to need one of these because you're not going to have a car. You're not going
to be able to afford to have a car. You're not going to be able to afford the taxes on it or
the charging on it. It's only the elites and the government that will have that ability. So why
put any charging stations out there for you people in flyover country? You know, we're going to have
them around Washington, DC. We're going to have them around Westminster and London. And, uh,
they said there are more charging ports in London's Westminster than there are in Birmingham, Liverpool, and Greater Manchester combined.
Because the elites are going to have private cars, and you won't.
As a matter of fact, they'll be chauffeur-driven.
There'll be multiple cars because they'll have this big entourage of security
to protect them from the people they've enslaved.
And when you look at the chart, go to this chart.
It's on page 21.
That's the map, but there's a bar chart that shows what's going on
a little bit further down.
And that's it.
Look at that.
That long line there, that's London.
And those first three lines up there, well, that's the UK, England, that type of thing.
So across the UK, across England, you're looking at like 52 charging devices per 100,000 people.
Per 100,000 people.
So you've got a couple of thousand people for each of these charging
devices. What's that tell you about how many people are going to be able to practically use
a car, right? Anyway, so, you know, about 50 per 100, 50 chargers per 100,000 population
over the UK in general and England, same thing. But in London, they have more than
double that. They have 122 for 100,000 people. The elites are going to have everything. You will
own nothing. You won't even be able to charge it if you've got it. Yeah, they've been charging
everything, putting it on the credit card. And so have you, by the way.
But all of us have been putting it on the charging cards.
But you won't be able to charge your car.
And so as all this is happening, it's now official.
As of last week, they made it official that the Ford Fiesta,
Britain's most owned car ever,
is going to be killed this June.
The Ford Fiesta.
They've sold more of these in the UK than any other car ever.
It's not that it's a failure.
It isn't that people have stopped buying it.
It's just that they aren't going to mass produce cars for people to own privately anymore.
As the company accelerates its plans to become fully electric, and it's not just fully electric.
Ford and GM and all these cars are saying, well, we're not a car company anymore.
We're going to be a mobility company, which tells you they're not interested in selling cars.
You know, Eric Peters and I have been talking about this for the longest time.
It's far more profitable for them to lease you a car than it is to sell you a car.
And it is far more profitable for them to rent you by the ride a car than it is to lease
it, than it is to sell it.
So they want to be mobility companies.
The Fiesta first arrived in 1976 and Ford has produced more than 22 million
of them. They've gone through nine generations of these Ford Fiestas. So it's being forced aside
by the coming ban on all internal combustion engines that's going to be arriving by 2030.
So Ford says, all right, we're going to stop selling this right now.
It's interesting, you know, Ford is very big in the UK.
When you look at their best-selling cars in Britain,
just as an interesting kind of trivia on the aside.
Ford Fiesta, $4.8 million that they sold.
Ford Cortina, $4.3 million.
Ford Escort, you're seeing a trend here.
Ford, Ford, 4.3 million. Ford Escort, you're seeing a trend here. Ford, Ford, Ford.
Then they have two Vauxhalls, which I think is also Ford in the UK,
if I'm not mistaken.
And then the Ford Focus.
And then at position number seven, you've got a Volkswagen,
the Volkswagen Golf, which we call the Rabbit in the U.S.
Eight, you're back to Vauxhall.
Nine was the Mini, the iconic little British car, the U.S. Eight, you're back to Vauxhall. Nine was the Mini, the iconic little
British car, the Mini. That's in ninth place. And then there was a BMW 3 in position number 10. So
the Fiesta has been hugely popular, and it's going by the wayside. And if we look at some of their
advertising stuff, you know, Ford's new baby, go back to the 1970s, go down and show them the picture of the advertising thing.
Ford has never had so much advanced engineering put into a small car a little bit further
down.
That's it right there.
And so, you know, they're talking about all the, you know, the space of the thing and
how cheap it is to own, but it's big on the inside and all the rest of the stuff.
You can even fit a chest of drawers in there.
They show down at the bottom.
This is why it was so popular.
But if you stop and think about it, they could put a lot of engineering into something because they had such a big mass market.
But that's going away.
There's not going to be a mass market for cars. Instead, as they get rid of something as
utilitarian as the Ford Fiesta, just below that article about the Ford Fiesta going away in the
British paper I was looking at, is this article about the new cars that are coming in. So instead of a very affordable, practical, mass-produced,
mass-owned Ford, you are going to wind up with a new electric SUV
made by Lotus that is actually going to be made in Wuhan, Wuhan, China.
And it's going to cost 90,000 pounds.
See?
You're going to have a few luxury cars,
and they're going to be made in China,
and the batteries and the minerals are all locked up.
You know, China's outflanked us on that thing.
And the amazing thing about this to me is,
besides the fact that it is super expensive
and it's going to be made in China and all the rest of the stuff.
And, of course, electric and everything.
Lotus.
Lotus, of all things.
Lotus, which, as they say, well, this car is going to retain the core principles and the DNA of Lotus.
Is it really?
Yeah, going back to 1948, what was it that Colin Chapman, the guy who,
you know, started Lotus, what was he known for? Uh, the Lotus cars were known for being very,
very, very lightweight and incredibly good handling because of that. You know,
we have a very lightweight car, uh, it's able to change direction very quickly.
And so the handling is just awesome. And that was what Lotus was famous for. I had a small
MR2 when they first came out and Toyota had sent it to Lotus to have them tweak the suspension,
make it handle well. And, but you know, Lotus is known for that. His
saying that he had, his principle,
this is what the DNA of Lotus was.
Colin Chapman said,
you have to simplify it
and then you add lightness.
You add lightness.
Everything was about making it light.
And now, they're going to make a very heavy electric
car.
How un-L unload us of them
and not only is it going to be a heavy electric car but it's going to be an suv electric car a
heavy heavy heavy car and it's not going to be british it's going to be chinese built in wuhan
and it's going to be super expensive but of course the lotuses always were pretty expensive
as a matter of fact i played a little bit of a clip yesterday of the prisoner. Uh, the car that's featured in that is
the Lotus seven. It's really stripped down and small. And one of the, uh, when I was looking at,
uh, trying to find that clip, one of the openings that they had for that, because at the beginning
of it, you see, he's very angry and he's driving through London in this really, really, really super low, uh, small car. And he drives to, um, you know,
MI six or whoever it is that he works for to resign angrily to resign. And, um, and the one
that they went with, he drives in the parking lot and his car just disappears in this black hole.
And the next thing you see him angrily marching down the hallway while thunder is clapping and all the sound stuff you know and
then he goes into the office and he's banging his fist on the desk at live score bet we love
cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you
that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Well, in one version that they didn't use,
they have him pulling in,
and instead of him disappearing into a black darkness,
he goes up to the parking garage thing and takes his ticket, and he doesn't wait for the arm to go up because his car is so low,
he just takes off at full speed underneath the parking arm because it is so low.
It was a very small, lightweight car, the Lotus seven.
And, uh, after they stopped making it, it was still so popular that, uh, another company,
uh, Catram, I think is the way it's pronounced.
Maybe I'm pronouncing it wrong.
Uh, but they purchased, uh, the rights to it and they continue to sell it.
And they even sell it as a kit if you want to put it together.
So number six actually drove a Lotus seven.
How about that?
So maybe, you know, they could kind of go along with that and they could call the Lotus that's going to be made in Wuhan.
Maybe they could call it the C-19.
Could be China or coronavirus 19, right? Uh, so this particular thing, $90,000 and, uh, you'll be able to charge it up in just
20 minutes.
If you've got a rapid charging station.
Now, you know, my little car is about the closest thing you buy anymore to a Lotus.
Uh, I can fill up my 10 gallon pump there in about 30 seconds, 40 seconds at the outside.
If it's a slow pump.
So I can charge it up 30 times faster and I can be down 20 miles or so down the road,
uh, before, before the Lotus is even finished charging.
They did a commercial, um, and, um, to show how fast, uh, the Miata was.
And so they had all these, uh, uh, hyper cars, you know, super, super cars and hyper sports
cars, super expensive, millions of dollars, all of them lined up in a row with a little
Miata.
And, um, they, uh, and they said the fastest convertible.
And so they, they start the clock and the guy in the Miata reaches around, grabs it, pulls it forward and it latches and he takes off and has to go a certain distance.
The other people, their tops are going up slowly.
One of them, I think it was a Ferrari.
The guy had to get out and go into the trunk and pull a thing out and he's bolting it and putting it there.
And so, you know, you could reproduce that.
And instead of putting on your top, you just charge your car up.
And I'd be 20 miles down the road easily before they ever got their Lotus charged.
Anyway, it's got a maximum driving range of 373 miles, but you can pay more.
You can get 120,000 pounds instead of 90,000 pounds.
You get 120,000 pound lotus suv more horsepower but you reduce the range down now
to 304 miles but the key thing is and the point is is that they are going to have very nice very
expensive hypercars and this is all you see i don't even look at automobile magazines anymore
because all you've got is expensive electric cars and hyper cars
that they're going to make one or two of you know or a half dozen or something like that
and uh you know you're gonna have the awesome martin valkyrie or something like that and you
know you're never going to see these things except in magazines or museums uh that's all they cover
anymore uh they're not really, except for Eric Peters.
Eric Peters covers the practical cars that you can still get
and talks about what we need to do to make sure that we've got
some transportation in the future.
But all the rest of the automotive press,
they're not about any of that stuff anymore.
Controversial plans to stop cars traveling between neighborhoods.
You think they've started this thing, low emission zones or ultra low emission zones,
you know, U-L-E-Z and London is, thank you, Rhonda.
I appreciate the tip.
Thank you very much, Rhonda Tate.
London, all these different places.
They say, well, you're not going to come in here unless you've got a zero emission
battery charged electric vehicle.
You can't even enter this area.
And so that's propping up all over the places, or if they let you in, they might charge you
a super, super high price, but for the most part, they just ban the cars.
And they started doing that before they came out and said, well, we're going to have a
complete ban.
We're just going to, we're going to ban any cars that have any emissions from these areas.
Can't travel there.
Now we're at the point where they're going to stop cars from being able to travel between neighborhoods.
And so the city of Canterbury, there's a Canterbury tale for you.
They are going to divide their city up into neighborhoods
into zones
and then they're going to prohibit you
from driving your car from one area to another
is this starting to look like a prison?
do you understand the design right now?
controversial plans to stop cars traveling between neighborhoods in Canterbury.
A draconian plan to stop people driving between neighborhoods has come under fire
for banning, quote, free movement, unquote, as it is approved for consultation.
So the government's going to go ahead with it anyway.
They don't care. They know what it's about.
This is what it's always been about.
It's like, wait a minute.
Do you realize you're banning our free movement? Yes, we do. We know
exactly what we're doing. And so Canterbury City Council is proposing to divide the city into five
different districts with drivers unable to cross between zones without being fined. Instead, the council is asking residents to drive along a new bypass,
which, along with other A roads, would create a ring road style approach.
There you go.
One ring to rule them all, and then immobility to bind them.
They'll lock you down in the shire.
You aren't going anywhere, pal.
Better get a pony.
I'm sure they'll find some way to ban the horses as well.
They would have to leave their current neighborhood and reenter their chosen location via specific newly permitted routes.
Wow.
And it's not going to stop here.
They're not going to be satisfied
until they have you living
in a Foxconn type of existence.
That's why I spent some time
talking about that Chinese factory.
Big iPhone city.
iPhone city.
Where everybody looks
and lives
as if they're in that 1984 Macintosh commercial.
They got the gray pajamas and they're enslaved and they can't get out.
And you've got a city dedicated to building iPhones and slave conditions and locking people down.
And that's what they want to do to everybody.
That model of what they have done in china is what they want to make globally so um
anybody breaking the new driving rule would be hit with a fine when their movement is captured
and it'll be captured using license plate recognition cameras yep just like the prisoner's
village except they won't have to put you don't have to try to hide the fact that they got cameras.
They won't have to put it in the heads of statues and the eyes or start
moving around.
You walk past it.
No,
I just be everywhere,
everywhere.
Uh,
so now we told you that,
um,
they're going to get rid of transportation and what you're talking about
here and this kind of an environment.
And what do you need?
Well, just like the prisoner's village, you don't need anything except your feet and at the very most because you're going to be
confined to this little neighborhood let's just call it a village neighborhood because you'll be
confined to the village neighborhood you'll only need to have an electric golf cart you won't need
the kind of car it's so wasteful to have these cars.
Nobody needs that except the government officials
because they have to be able to travel.
But you don't.
So you get a golf cart if you're lucky.
If you're lucky.
It's all about population control.
It's all about containment.
It always was.
The conspiracy is now becoming a mandate and dictates by dictators.
So they said when they were asked about it,
the city councilor there in Canterbury said,
I have no real idea what this is going to cost.
It could total about 100 million pounds.
And so they said, the government certainly is not going to stump up the money,
and we can't either, said one person who was pushing against this.
We don't have any idea what it's going to cost.
Well, where are we going to get the money?
This could be 100 million pounds, because you're going to have to create a new road, the ring to rule them all.
And you're going to put up all these surveillance cameras to read our license plates and all the
infrastructure behind that and hire people. And how are we going to do that? Well, no price is
too high for you to pay for your own slavery that's the bottom line we don't
care about the cost you're the one paying for your chains you're paying for your interrogation
you're paying for your chains you're paying for your slavery i mean to save the planet that's what
you're really paying for you're not paying for enslavement You're not paying for chains.
You're paying to save the planet and no price.
It's too high for that.
Residents would instead be encouraged to use public transportation
or to walk or to use a bicycle.
That's why Google called their model...
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet
up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18 plus gamblingcare.ie.
Smart city.
They called it Sidewalk Labs in Toronto.
And before all this pandemic nonsense began,
I was this close to a trip up to Toronto
to report about Google's smart city, Sidewalk Labs. And that was what I said. I said, you're
going to be walking on the sidewalk. You're going to be living on the sidewalk. You're going to be
spending as much time on the sidewalk as you can, because even if you've
got an apartment, it's going to be only 200 square feet. You want to get out and get on the sidewalk
and walk around. And they'll be watching you, everything that you do. Everything was about
surveillance. As a matter of fact, you had a lot of people in Toronto who were, you know, members
of the green religion. They were true believers and everything green.
And they signed up to be a part of that project. And as they looked at it, they said, well,
wait a minute. This is all just about surveillance. Everything we do, our garbage is being monitored and surveilled. This is just about total surveillance. This is creepy. I don't want
to have anything to do with this. Many of the people who even believed in the green fables
wanted to get out because they could see the Orwellian reality of what it was.
And it was no coincidence that they called it Sidewalk Labs.
Labor leader said at the meeting,
we need incentives to help people change how they travel,
not a draconian ban on free movement which could be more contrary to the British way of life so you have
three different parties represented here you have the Liberal Democrats which are
more like I said liberal parties in the UK liberal parties in in Australia they
use that we talk about libertarianism. Many people say classical
liberal. Liberal used to mean you were about liberty, right? And people who want to focus
on liberty will still call themselves liberal in the UK and in Australia, except that they're not
all that much. But first you have the liberal Democrat counselor who says, well, wait a minute,
this is going to cost a tremendous amount of money. I don't know where we're going to get that. Right.
It sounds like a libertarian. You know,
you realize how much money this is going to cost and where are we going to get
it? And a little bit about the freedom, not much.
Then you got the labor leader. The labor leader says, well,
we don't want to restrict people's movement.
We need to talk about how we're going to subsidize this.
Yeah, let's spend some money and we'll make them dependent on us for free movement.
How about that?
That's labor's approach.
Then you have the conservative plan.
And the conservative party, the conservative council leader said, doing nothing is not an option.
We just got to do it.
I don't really care if it restricts people's freedom.
I don't care if it costs money.
The conservative Tory says, let's just do it.
We can't just not do this.
We got to do it.
Why?
Why can't you leave well enough alone?
Why can't you leave us alone?
Why can't you let us drive between neighborhood and neighborhood?
You're saying doing, not restricting people's travel between neighborhoods?
That is not an option to not do that?
That you must?
Who are you taking your marching orders from, conservatives?
And the UK?
So there's your three different, that's the three big parties.
Conservative, Labour, and Liberal Democrat.
We're worried about the money.
Let's just spend the money and subsidize it, and people will love us because we give them a hand.
We are going to take away their freedom, but then hand it back to them like an allowance.
That's the Democrats.
And then the Conservatives.
We've got to do this.
We can't fall behind.
We've got to keep up with the times.
You know, Rishi Sunak is their leader. We've got to do this. We can't fall behind. We've got to keep up with the times.
Rishi Sunak is their leader, and I guess maybe he's taking his plans.
Now, this is base.
This has already been done.
This is not the first city to do it in Canterbury.
Belgian city of Ghent did this back in 2017, five years ago.
A city in Belgium did it.
And so we have to copy that, says the conservative council member.
They divide the city into six areas then,
so they could cut the cars out of the city center.
Again, this is always about car prohibition.
It's always about restricting your movement.
It's been that way since 1970, the first Earth Day.
It's part of a draft of a local plan,
which also suggests building 13,000 homes in this area by 2025.
Again, what is that about?
Concentrating population.
The cities will continue to get denser and denser as the ability to move around is restricted more and more.
And we've been seeing this in the United States for a long time, haven't we?
And the cities where I've lived,
when I want to get away from the cities,
when I did get away from the cities,
Austin was a good example of it,
and I've seen it other places as well.
Austin is growing by leaps and bounds,
and they're packing more and more people in.
And when we went back for the wedding,
we saw all these new apartment buildings
that were being built everywhere,
even in the outskirts.
We were about 45 minutes to an hour outside of Austin
and going normal speeds,
which I didn't go during, during the lockdown
in the wee hours of the morning when I was driving in at three or four o'clock in the
morning into work during lockdown, I could drive whatever I wanted to drive.
The police weren't getting anybody tickets.
Uh, but anyway, um, that, that was, uh, kind of got me spoiled. Anyway, the, um, um, what was I saying?
Oh, they, they're not building any new roads in Austin.
The only new roads they build are toll roads and they will restrict and, uh, wreck traffic
for years and years in order to build a new toll road.
And then when they do, um, you know, uh, people don't want to drive it.
So what they do is as they're building the toll road, they will add traffic light after
traffic light after traffic light on the roads that were already there to try to force you
onto the toll road.
It's just despicable what they're doing.
That toll roads and most places are being owned by a company out of Spain.
But there, it's being run by the Department of Transportation for the most part in Texas.
But the bottom line is they just keep packing more and more people in,
but they don't add any more road capacity unless it's a toll road.
And they do that at a very slow rate.
So that's what they're doing here.
They're going to add 13,000 homes to Canterbury while they start restricting all the mobility and telling people they can't even
drive from one neighborhood to the other. So when you look at this, do you start to get the sense
that we're under attack? Do you start to get the sense that we're their enemy? Because what would
you do to your enemy if you were at war with them?
Well, one of the things that you do is you restrict their mobility, right?
Yeah, we got them.
They can't move.
The other thing you do is you remove their ability to communicate.
Oh, yeah, we get banned off of social media and things like that. And also at the same time, whatever communication they do have,
you make sure that you are able to monitor all of it.
Yeah. Just like, um, um, they did in a world war two, you know,
they hacked the Enigma code that the Germans had. And yeah,
go ahead and use your radio. We know everything that you're planning to do.
And how did that work out?
Well, you know, they had to be careful because they said,
well, you know, we know they're going to do X.
So should we intervene and stop them and destroy them when they do that?
Or should we kind of, because that will tip our hand,
and then they'll know that we can read their mail, essentially,
listen to all of their, you know, we've decoded Enigma.
And so that'll change everything.
We may lose that.
Or do we wait and hit them bigger by leaving?
And that's what they're doing to us as well.
They have the ability to listen to everything that we're doing,
watch everything that we're doing,
shut down our ability to communicate with each other,
shut down our ability to move.
This is war, folks.
This is war.
Sanctions are an act of war.
Sanctions kill people.
Sanctions are being enacted against our country.
It hasn't hurt Putin and the Russians.
It hasn't hurt China.
They're doing great. against our country. It hasn't hurt Putin and the Russians. It hasn't hurt China.
They're doing great.
I said months ago, already at that point in time,
just a couple of months after the sanctions started,
Putin enjoyed $320 billion bonus.
He was producing less oil and getting paid a lot more for it,
even with a 30% discount if people paid him in rubles or gold.
So he's doing less, making more money.
Whereas we are seeing the price of everything skyrocket, and now people are looking at energy shortages coming up during the winter.
The plans to stop people from moving from one neighborhood to the other, were opposed during the meeting, it says.
But they've gone to residence for consultation until the new year.
So nobody liked this plan,
except for maybe the conservative counselor.
And that means that they're not going to stop it, though.
They approved it to go to the next plan.
And then they're going to take it to the neighborhoods. And they're going to run the same scam that they've been doing for years in
neighborhoods in the u.s when they were pushing agenda 21 even before they started calling it the
2030 agenda the un 2030 agenda even before they started calling it the great reset that began in
2015 prior to 2015 it was called agenda 21 they, sometime in the 21st century, we're going to create mega smart cities that are going to be like Foxconn, and we're going to imprison everybody in those cities.
And it's going to be great because, you know, we'll have fewer people and all the green agenda the way they sold it was they went around to different communities and they used
these local committees and they would um they say they're going to have consultations with residents
it's going to be a massive pr and propaganda push and they'll probably roll it out the same way they
were selling agenda 21 the rand corporation came up with what they call the delphi technique and they would bring people in that were you know active in the community took an active role and paid attention
to what was going on those are most of the other people most of the people in any community are
just too busy living their lives to care about any of this stuff but the people who would pay
attention they're bringing them into these committee meetings and they would set them down, they would divide up into groups, and they would have a facilitator
as part of this Delphi technique, and they would walk them through and ask them for input.
But they would very carefully guide them so that they believed that they were coming up
with a solution, which is really what the Delphi people had already decided they wanted to do.
It's a very sophisticated technique to get people on board
to think that it was coming from the people
when it was actually being imposed upon them from the top down.
So World Economic Forum Prime Minister Rishi Sunak,
newly installed in the UK, has said that he has now changed his mind and he's going to go to COP27.
He's done, as they point out, a screeching U-turn.
These climate change summits, this is the 27th one, and he's now going to go to it after saying he wasn't going to go.
He says, there is no long-term prosperity without action on climate change.
There is no energy security without investing in renewables.
That is why I will attend COP27 next week to deliver on Glasgow's legacy of building a secure and sustainable future.
And, of course, the last one they had was in,
the COP26 was in Glasgow.
That's why he's talking about that.
As Daily Skeptic says, now the UK,
he's repeating the eco-fantasist mantra
that, quote, there is no long-term prosperity
without action on climate change,
which is exactly the opposite of the truth.
Even the IPCC, the International Panel on Climate Change out of the UN,
even the IPCC doesn't predict economic catastrophe from this. And yet we see the economic consequences
of trying to move away from what they call fossil fuels and without anything to replace it.
We have, as they say in the Daily Skeptic,
immature and unsuitable alternatives.
We have nothing to replace what they demand we ban
because they demand that we have nothing,
that we have nothing.
We're going to take a break, and we're going to come back.
Tony Arterburn is going to join us, and we're going to talk a little bit about economics.
We're going to talk about gold, because Tony has set up DavidKnight.gold
to take you to his company, WiseWolf.gold, where you can get gold, silver.
And Tony will even help you buy Bitcoin, if you wish.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and
the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate
the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
We're going to talk about the economy.
We're going to talk about
how do we prepare
for this planned enslavement.
Stay with us.
Has your news been censored, banned, censored, banned over and over again?
Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media?
It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to the DavidKnightShow.com.
There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links.
Live stream the show at DLive and TRIP every Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. Eastern.
Videos at Bitchute and Ugetube.
New audio podcast, The Real David Knight Show at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher,
iHeart, and more.
But even though there's a light
at the end of the tunnel,
without your support,
the show will run out of gas.
The links to support the show
are at thedavidknightshow.com
to donate via Subscribestar, donate via
or donate via Cash App, Bitcoin, or P.O. Box. Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with
us to get this far. Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our
family. All right, and joining us now is Tony Arderman. Tony has been a great friend, supporter,
and frequent guest host here for us when we're gone.
Wisewolf.gold is where he sells gold and silver,
and also Bitcoin.
And Tony has been kind enough to set up DavidKnight.gold,
which lets him know that you come through this program.
Thank you for joining us, Tony. How are you doing? Oh, great to oh great to be here david thanks for having me well we've had some always
a pleasure to have you we've had some interesting news in the last 24 hours i was really surprised
to see i started seeing this telegraphed i think uh late monday night or early tuesday morning
that they're going to have another interest rate increase before the election. And it was another big one, 75 basis points.
Yeah, the Fed's playing its own game.
You know, Powell said something that I can't believe more people haven't talked about.
He said it about 90 days ago.
He said, I don't think that we will cause a recession or we will have to.
I thought, that's interesting.
I have to cause it.
You believe you have the authority to cause a
recession, but they do have the power to do that. I mean, so much of our economy is based off the
central bank and the fake fiat currency system. So again, I think what they're doing now, David,
this is just my opinion. They're not going to the 1970s style Paul Volcker interest rates of 20%.
As a matter of fact, I was doing some
research this morning. I found a great website that just broke down debt to GDP ratio.
And I couldn't even really believe the numbers. I was going back to the 1960s, looking at the debt.
You know, 1963, the debt of the United States was $306 billion. And I thought, wait, that can't be
right. Yeah, it's right. And you look at the
1970s and the debt doubled. So it didn't do that. World War II is like $260 billion at the end.
Then it was $300 in the 1960s, then $400, but it went to $800, $900 billion by the end of the
1970s. And of course, they raised interest the to like 20 percent as you know the fed
the fed can't do that now and if you look at the and this is what i wanted to bring up which is
something they can't do now the debt to income and gdp in 1979 the debt to gdp was 32 percent
in the united states today it's 120.
wow that's they can't raise interest rates like that. So I think what they're
doing, I think this is a culling. I think they're picking winners and losers. I've discussed that
with you before in the last couple of years. I think when they do try to tackle the damage that's
been done with their quantitative easing for the last 14 years. And you and I were talking about this before the scam Demick.
I mean,
they put in $6 trillion in the overnights in the repo.
And that was not covered by the mainstream media before COVID.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That was the thing,
the repo market.
And it's like,
they're putting all this money.
It's like,
what is the repo market?
I was,
I was like,
Gary Johnson,
what is a repo?
Instead of what is a lepo?
I was like,
what in the world?
And all this money is flowing into it.
It's like in one day, they put the entire gross domestic product of Switzerland in, you know, in terms of the massive amounts of money they were throwing at that.
It's absolutely unbelievable.
And they're not going to be able to do anything really to curtail the damage they've done.
I think they want to bring in a soft landing for their fellow travelers.
That's what they want to bring in a soft landing for their fellow travelers. That's what they want to do.
Again, I think they've picked winners and losers, and that's what they're going to roll out here, I think, in these rate hikes.
So what's happened in the markets?
Because I'm looking at this headline.
Powell pulls a rug out from the euphoric Fed statement reaction and terminal rates spike.
What did it do to the stock market?
What did it do to the stock market? What did it do to the gold market?
Well, again, it signals that, and I think people may have a flawed perception.
What it does is it says there's going to be a strong dollar.
The dollar's strong, and there's not going to be more inflation.
So, again, it can signal that the markets are stable.
The dollar's going to be okay.
There isn't going to be hyperinflation, and all you see, you know, gold and silver tumble. That's what they say, which is interesting because I'm having a very,
very hard time, not just me, but every other gold and silver dealer in the world is trying to find
silver. Uh, gold is not so much in short supply, but as I've been reporting here on this program,
uh, it's harder and harder to get specific items anymore. And I'm just warning people, when it comes time when I think even the,
you saw that massive order, there was a billionaire in Texas
that ordered silver about two months ago, and they couldn't fill her order.
She wanted to get so many American Eagles and 90%,
and they said, well, we're going to have to go through multiple exchanges,
and it'll take three or four months. So you can't just pull up to the window and say, I want this.
There's not that much supply. I think we're going to reach a reckoning very, very soon
when the paper markets and the fake fiat markets, what you could refer to as the Jim Cramer markets,
the hedge fund people that they have, they have just, they're stuck in a normalcy bias
and they believe in that system.
It's a fake system.
And again, I'm looking at these charts, looking at debt of the United States.
It's just absolutely unbelievable, and debt to GDP.
It's an unsustainable system.
I think when all of this is really pointing back to a currency reset, and they call it the Great Reset, but really it's all about currencies, and it's about who dominates the world reserve currencies.
You've got the BRICS nations getting stronger day by day, and now that we've weaponized the dollar against Russia, Russia weaponized energy, you've got a change in the global set.
So I think people are going to get caught flat-footed, for lack of a better term, when this does when, uh, people, and I think big money realizes that
they've got to get out of their paper and into real assets and then there just won't be any.
Yeah. Yeah. And of course, you know, you've got these, um, uh, these ETFs of gold and silver,
the paper gold and silver, and that that's in the Shanghai gold exchange. And it's like,
you look at that and it's like, not only is it derivatives, not only is it paper,
not only do we not know if they've got anything there, but the place it's supposed to be stored in is Shanghai.
Do you trust them?
And are they going to be locked down by, um, is Shanghai going to all of it go back into lockdown again, as they've been doing?
I mean, they're, they did it to Shanghai Disney this last week.
So, uh, you know, all of that stuff is really shaky.
Uh, I like what you said about the Jim Cramer economy.
I think that's what we need to
call this it's going to become a dirty uh word like jim crow you know we'll talk about yeah
remember the jim kramer days you know the like the jim crow days uh to enslave us because that's
what this is really about uh inflation is up over 300 percent in venez. As a matter of fact, 359% over the last three months is an annual rate of 359%.
We can't even imagine that kind of hyperinflation.
But, of course, we've seen worse than that in Zimbabwe.
And we might wind up having a situation like that as well.
And that might actually, you know, when I look at it, all these things have a silver lining, don't they? That might actually train us to create our own alternative economy, which would be the
only thing that's going to stabilize it when the center collapses, right? Well, that's right. It
goes back to something referred to as Gresham's law. Gresham's law says that when bad money enters
an economy, it drives good money out. that happens for a while but as we if you
look at history use history as your guide you will see that when paper currencies fail people always
go back to precious metals i mean it's through throughout human history that's that's been the
story and the cycle continues again and again and again the dollar has had the advantage of
dominating the world through geopolitics and you know the hegemonic power of the United States
using its military to prop up that dollar.
And that's waning as we're watching unfold.
And Venezuela would be what we are experiencing right now.
Again, if we were isolated, we would have had hyperinflation long ago.
But because we have so much of our
globalization with the dollar which the ponzi scheme continues people in venezuela you know
you read stories about how they've adopted using just scrap gold like not even coins but just
jewelry and being able to test it like it's just amazing i've read stories about how they're doing
that and of course bitcoin adoption um i thought one of the greatest stories I've seen in a while was Nigeria. Did you see this story up on Zero Hedge?
Yeah, I talked about that.
The CBDC in Nigeria, and nobody wants it. And they thought, well, they're using Bitcoin. Why aren't they using us? And they don't want your biometric surveillance system. They don't want that. People want to have actual money.
Well, I think what's interesting about that, Tony, was the fact that they thought that Bitcoin is going to be the training wheels for CBDC, and it turned out to be the other way around.
Bitcoin usage actually went up because people started saying, oh, I can do this digitally,
do it on my phone, but I don't have to have all the tracking and control stuff, so I'll go
get Bitcoin. So CBDC went down to less than half of a percent usage and Bitcoin
soared. And so people said, no, I'll take the other thing. I thought the article was really
optimistic. And I was on a show called Quite Frankly yesterday. We were talking about how
the narratives have changed and the ultimate goal of bringing in the central bank digital currency.
So I'm optimistic when I read articles like that,
but I do think that they'll use a major crisis.
This won't just be in a vacuum.
They're not just going to roll out central bank digital currencies
and say, here, once you use it, don't you want to use this and adopt this?
I think it'll be more of a have to.
Or this is two-year advance.
We're saving you.
Download your digital wallet.
Scan your iris and scan your thumb and all the rest of the stuff they're going to do with the
biometrics surveillance. And so I think that'll happen after a crisis. I hope I'm wrong by the
way. Well, that's my take on it. I, like I was saying, you know, they're going to, uh, it's
going to be very easy for them to shut down Bitcoin if they want to, just as we saw in China,
you know, you've got a very easily identified. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's
why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10
euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
A consumer of power with these miners doing the transactions.
And so all they have to do is just go there and easily find out who's using all the power.
Just go there and physically shut them down. And now that, now that they've had this, uh, you know, we look at it and we say,
well, that's great. Uh, they, they put this out there to see if people wanted to use it.
And people said, no, well, the elites have been looking at that as well. Right, Tony. I mean,
they saw this and they said, well, you know what, if we put this thing out there, people aren't
going to voluntarily use it. All right. So how are we going to force them to do it? We'll do it with
a rubber hose or whatever we have to do, but we we going to force them to do it? We'll do it with a rubber hose or whatever we have to do,
but we're going to force them to do this.
And that is what they're going to do.
And if you look at Biden's plans,
where he's got all of the government agencies
have got one of four tasks.
One of them is to redesign the economic system.
The other one is to design how the technology
is going to process the digital stuff,
the law enforcement aspect of it, the rubber hose aspect of it. And then the fourth one was how they're going to tell everybody going to have it. And that was the green agenda,
right? We're not going to use the power that these other guys are going to do. So they're
going to say, we got a problem because we've shut down all of our power input. We didn't know,
just like they're saying now with the amnesty stuff who knew you know it's a complicated situation we didn't mean to break the entire power
grid but we just happened we meant well we're trying to save everybody but now we don't have
any power so guess what you're going to use our cbdcs because if you use any other cryptocurrency
we're going to see where you're using power we're going to come in and shut you down
yeah disruptively and iteratively right that's that's the way they're rolling it
out it reminds me of uh the story that i covered hosting your show a couple years ago uh on what
was it yale that did the study pre-vaccine like how do we get people to adopt this and they had
the different thing on social pressure and do the right thing and yeah all of that tied to it
environmental uh i think you you'll start seeing stories
about how Bitcoin's possibly racist
or something like that.
You'll see gold is racist
and silver harkens back to imperialism or something.
They'll come up with all sorts of things.
And you'll have to adopt it, I think,
really after a crisis.
And that's yet to be seen.
Well, you know, we got Biden out there and he's yet to be seen well you know we got biden
out there and he's complaining about the oil companies trying to pass the buck to them trying
to make them the fall guys for all the policies that he's done and talking about the fact they
have uh high profits and of course this is a this is a function of rapidly rising prices you're
seeing that happening in food as well and yet he doesn't
talk about profiteering does he tony when it comes to military industrial complex in ukraine he
doesn't talk about profiteering when it comes to big pharma and of course you know visor is going
to increase by 400 percent uh the cost of its vaccines do they need to do that of course not
you know the the inflation that is there from the fuel and the food is caused by biden but nobody is uh you know they're just raising the price on the
vaccines because uh they're greedy uh but they're pushing this stuff do you think that um uh well
certainly i i kind of think that they're they're angling for price controls maybe if there's enough
republicans in congress that won't happen but of course, Republicans have bought into price controls, wage controls in the past
as well.
But I think they're pushing for that.
NPR and some people on the left are actually even pushing for them to nationalize oil production
because that'd be the most effective way for them to just completely shut it down, I think.
What do you think is on the horizon?
I think price controls are a real possibility because, again, I think that allows them to cull their competition.
This is the crony capitalism fascism that we're seeing rolled out.
I mean, the apocalypse is brought to you in part by Pfizer.
That's what they got the record profits and they love those profits.
I mean, the left and the globalists love mega corporations when they have that ESG, the environmental social governance.
And again, this is a really strange time to try to defend free markets when there hardly isn't any.
And you see these companies like BlackRock, I guess if you want to call them a company,
they're some kind of entity, some kind of organism that is pushing this, you know,
the communism and socialism through the central
banks and through the bullying that they do in these retirement accounts and all the rest of it
in conjunction with the federal government. Again, I think that we're seeing them more and more
pick who's going to survive the downturn that they themselves are causing.
Yeah, I agree. We've had Congressman Alex Mooney,
a Republican from West Virginia,
has introduced a bill
called the Gold Standard Restoration Act.
Now, this is an interesting thing.
And, you know, what do you think is going to,
this is a Mises Institute article here.
What do you think is going to happen?
Will we be forced back into a constitutional gold standard?
I don't think so.
Actually, I have reservations about that, David,
because I don't believe the government needs to have currency that they create.
We don't need them.
We have an international gold standard.
Now with technology and the way we have banks set up, we don't need them we have an international gold standard now with technology and the way we have
banks set up we don't need them uh again there's there's no reason to have them in the last time
that they were in charge of the gold standard it was illegal for you to own gold at live score bet
we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance
to reward you that's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10
if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie.
Yeah.
So I don't like that.
I mean, it took, I mean, Franklin Roosevelt made it illegal for you to own gold in 1933.
And Gerald Ford, was it five years after Nixon took us off the gold standard, made it legal
for people to own, American people to own gold bullion again.
I like this system now.
The problem is, is that, problem is that the federal government with their
currency creation and ties to the central bank are going to collapse our civilization.
So I don't know. To me, when you start looking at should we have a gold standard in this country,
I think, yes, we should. And maybe the government shouldn't be in the money business. Maybe we
don't need them. That's my thoughts with looking at our history. I mean, really a silver dollar, what is that other than
just, you know, uh, three quarters of an ounce of silver? I mean, uh, a $20 gold piece is, uh,
basically an ounce of gold. Um, what did I need them for? Yeah. What he was trying to do in his
bill, you know, he has three different sections. One of them is like, you know, well, you know,
fiat currency is dangerous. Um, we don't want that. The next one is like, well, fiat currency is dangerous. We don't want that.
The next one is, okay, so what do we do in terms of anchoring the U.S. dollar to some official gold price?
And then the third part is exactly how that would work.
And he would say things like the gold price and the U.S. dollar could develop in an orderly manner within 30 days after the bill has taken effect.
But as you point out,
the thing we have to be concerned about is that they may come along and say,
well,
now only we can,
uh,
um,
have gold and,
and outlaw it.
So that is a danger that is always there because we've seen them do that.
I mean,
it's not a theory.
It's not a conspiracy theory.
It's actually a conspiracy they've already done at least,
you know,
in the,
in the past.
Right.
Uh, so that, that's my concern we we
don't i saw an article that i i should have brought up last time around i think it was a
week or so ago it was some bitcoin magazine and somebody was saying that they need to peg the
dollar to bitcoin or that they just might do that i thought well that would be an interesting i might
get behind that um but i have reservations about gold simply because of the history when when they
become the only entities that can own it which is highly highly suspect and if you look at
what happened to our um our debt following and you can see that other countries knew this
you know in 1964 it's the last time we ran uh our 90 silver dimes quarters and half dollars and
dollars uh out of the U S mint.
And, uh, other countries took notice that we just, we were debasing our currency.
And by the, you know, 1971 Nixon had to take us off the gold standard because so many countries
were saying, okay, we're getting rid of our dollars and turning it into gold as fast as we
can. And we're depleting our, our gold reserves that we had. So we had to stop the bleeding. We'd already based it.
And so, again, I don't think that that is the solution per se.
They're not even talking anymore, David, about cutting spending.
When's the last time you heard of fiscal hawk in the conservative movement talk about government?
It's nowhere on the horizon.
So I'm not, in theory, I'd love that if we all just went back, a gold standard, that would be great. I talk about it all the time. But this guy was like, again, I agree with tariffs. You know, I've had this anybody in this current crop of politicians, I don't want anywhere near making decisions on economics anymore.
They've proven themselves, you know, they've been weighed in the balance and left wanting.
And so I just.
Well, the key is you got to reduce the size of government.
You know, it's like Jefferson on his second inaugural said, you know, because we've reduced the size of government, we've eliminated useless offices.
We can now we've now eliminated all internal taxes. And so nobody who is a labor,
nobody who's a mechanic, a farmer, a laborer knows a tax man. And so, you know, they were able to fund the entire government off of taxes at the border because the government was small enough
to fit inside the constitution. We're nowhere close to reducing that.
And you don't hear that, as you pointed out for me, the conservatives.
They're not talking about that.
The only time you ever even hear them, they don't talk about any spending reductions,
and they don't talk about balancing the budget unless they're trying to push a constitutional
convention to reorganize our government.
And then they'll use that as the bait.
You know, oh, yeah, you know, we could balance the budget.
And it's like, well, OK, you're going to balance a budget, but you're not going to
touch spending.
Um, what's that going to do to taxes?
You know, we've seen the same type of thing in Colorado.
You had the Colorado governor policy, Hey, we're going to get rid of income taxes and
we'll just go with taxes on that dirty fuel that you put in your car.
It's like, well, what's that going to do?
The independence center institute ran the numbers. So, and they said, without cutting any spending, that'd mean that you'd
wind up paying $45 in taxes on a gallon of gasoline. You know, so you get into that kind
of a situation. It's really about the spending. It's about what the government is doing that they
don't have any authority to do. And yeah, yeah. Absolutely right. And, and, and again, I don't
see any, anything on the horizon that says there's going to be fiscal equilibrium at all. We've still
got, as long as you have the American empire, uh, then you can't have the American Republic.
You can't have sanity and the American empire continues and grows every day.
That's right. Yeah. He's not going to complain about the profiteering from Raytheon or from
Pfizer. Uh, he's not, he'll talk Exxon, and he'll do that to try to
cover for himself because from day one, he's done everything he can to destroy our energy input,
and that also immediately goes into our food. And so he's going to play that game about
profiteering with them. And in the meantime, isn't this interesting how he came out and said,
look at this, I'm going to get you the biggest cost of living increase in Social Security.
In decades, it's like everybody fact-checked him.
Twitter fact-checked him.
Even CNN fact-checked him and said, well, that's because it's been tied to inflation since Nixon.
But they didn't point out the fact.
So what you're bragging about is how much inflation you've caused.
What an idiot he is.
It's funny. We've raised it 8%, but inflation's up 17.
You're still net negative, but nobody's really doing it. Nobody does math anymore. And I'm not
that great at it, but certainly no one in government is doing any math whatsoever. And
I saw that they had to take that post down. I thought, wow,
you're truly an idiocracy. He just owned himself. Yeah. And of course, anybody who's got half a
brain realizes that, as you just pointed out, the real inflation rate after they manipulated back
in the 90s is about twice what they're talking about. But even worse than that, they're going
to run the numbers, then come up with an increase that they're going to give you several months from now.
And inflation is going to continue to be going up by then.
So you're way behind the curve.
And then they're going to fix that for the next year as inflation continues to increase
and at an increasing rate.
You know, so that's, I mean, it's just lose, lose everywhere you look at it.
But he's out there bragging about that.
It's just amazing.
Yeah.
It's not just Biden who has no brain.
It's all the people around him.
It's not a brain trust.
It's a brainless trust that they've got around them.
Well, what's going on in the store right now?
Anything, uh, new?
Uh, well, we are, uh, very busy and, uh, handling a lot of David
Knight dot gold, uhld listeners and customers.
We so appreciate that.
And things are just, again, the momentum's picking up.
I know that I'm here for a reason.
I'd ask your audience to say a prayer for our business if they have time.
We so appreciate that because I really feel like I've got so much work to do, David.
I'm trying to get new contacts for where we can get supply.
I'm very anxious about seeing the back office in the way that I used to order
and the delays that we're seeing from the mints,
the delays that I'm seeing just for generic silver rounds or bars.
I mean, when's the last time, and I can't remember,
that I've said I want 100-ounce silver bars and I had a four-week delay.
I've never seen that before.
There's just so much accumulation.
Again, the larger accounts are getting into the physical metals game.
I'm opening up a new office in Denison, Texas.
My mom has an antique mall there right on the border of Oklahoma and Texas where the Red River is.
I'm going to open up a small place where you can drop off and exchange. there right on the border of Oklahoma and Texas on the, uh, in the, where the red river is. And,
uh, I'm going to open up a small place where you can drop off an exchange. We're trying to do that to increase the amount of product that we can receive, uh, you know, through, uh, regionally,
because I have my office here in Branson as well. So we're just, we're, we're Kenzie and I, uh,
the whole crew here, we're just, we're doing our best our best to fill orders. Wolfpack is really strong.
We're gaining members of that every single day, two or three a day at least.
And tell me what Wolfpack is.
Wolfpack is an idea that I came up with about a monthly membership program. You start at the $50
level, which is the lone wolf package. And that gets you, I think last month we put a premium
silver round in there some silver
quarters maybe a silver dime uh again we're getting you fifty dollars worth of of metals we
pick it for you though we send you the invoice and show you a price comparison it goes all the way up
to the wise wolf where i capped it at 500 a month again we pick the metals for you but we also show
you hey you save money you say you save currency you save dollars uh and also show you, Hey, you saved money. You say you save currency, you save dollars.
Uh, and we show you how that breaks down. And, uh, right now we're going to be filling orders for the rest of the week. It's, uh, I'm looking at boxes right now up to my right, but we got
stuff stacked out here. So it's, uh, it's blown up faster than I thought it would. And, uh, people,
I did, I thought, well, maybe I'll have 50 members in a couple of months. No, that's not how that
went. Uh, so I had to help in and, uh, well, it's a win-win situation.
I've seen a lot of really positive comments from people who have tried it and they're
very happy with it.
And, uh, there's a great price that they're getting a great program where they could do
it on a, on a regular basis.
So people that I've gotten feedback from unsolicited, uh, have been real happy with it.
Well, yeah, I so appreciate the positive feedback. I
mean, we had a David Knight listener, uh, sell us 4,000 ounces of, uh, one ounce Canadian maple
leaves last week. Uh, he, he got to get a great price, drove it from Tennessee. Uh, so appreciate
him. And, uh, that allowed me, I took at least 600 of those ounces and put them into Wolfpack.
So that's how we're able to pass on the savings and show you you're actually getting good. Cause everybody wins in that transaction. The seller, uh, one, we win and then the Wolfpack. So that's how we're able to pass on the savings and show you you're actually getting good because everybody wins in that transaction. The seller won, we win, and then the Wolfpack members
win. So that's what we're trying to do here at Wise Wolf. And if you go into davidknight.gold,
you can click the link that says join Wolfpack. And of course, you can always buy direct. If you
just want to do something with us and lock into trade, you can contact us through the toll-free
number. One of the best ways to contact us, David, is just text that toll-free number that's on your
website. Uh, either myself or Kenzie will answer it. And, uh, and it was usually, usually within
a couple of hours. Yeah. I don't know how you do it. I mean, you've got so many different
irons in the fire. You're doing a lot of, uh, hosting and talking on radio shows. I mean,
it's with all the stuff that's happening and all the supply chain disruptions with metals,
that is more than a full-time job right there,
and you're doing all the talk stuff as well.
So hats off.
I stand on the shoulders of giants, sir, with you.
I get to know what the news is.
You can do all the research.
I know what the news is every day,
so I don't have to do so much research.
And when I'm doing your show, it's just basically leftovers
from everything I learned from you throughout the weeks and months. And, uh, when I'm doing your show, it's just basically leftovers from everything I learned from you
throughout the weeks and months.
So that's kind.
That's kind.
Yeah.
Feel free to use any of it.
I,
we got to get this stuff out.
I try to,
to,
uh,
triage it to what I think is important for people to know.
So,
uh,
if it's something that's important for people to know by all means,
spread it around.
I tell that to people all the time.
So,
um,
well,
it's great having you on Tony.
Thank you so much for the support. And again, people can, one way that you can get to Tony is through
davidknight.gold. And that'll take you to wise. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much
as we love football, the excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every
day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.
Wolf.gold. It's always great talking to you, Tony. Thank you.
Thank you, David. Thank you for your support. All right, we're going great talking to you, Tony. Thank you. Thank you, David.
Thank you for your support.
All right, we're going to be right back, folks.
Stay with us.
Has your news been censored, banned, censored, banned over and over again?
Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media?
It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to thedavidknightshow.com.
There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links.
Live stream the show at DLive and TREVOR every Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. Eastern.
Videos at Bitchute and Ugetube.
New audio podcast, The Real David Knight Show,
at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart, and more.
But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel,
without your support, the show will run out of gas.
The links to support the show are at thedavidknightshow.com to donate via Subscribestar, donate via P***, or donate via P*** Cash App, Bitcoin, or P.O. Box.
Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this far.
Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family.
All right, welcome back.
We have some comments that were made.
Cajun Times says, Geo what?
This is posted when you're talking about geospatial intelligence.
Geospatial intelligence, geo, you know, you geolocate something, right?
That's where is it on Earth?
And so geospatial means, you know, where are these people?
And intelligence means that they're data mining what you're doing.
And they're able to map out people's political beliefs or religious beliefs to find out, you know, what they're doing.
And that is a very important thing for them. It also feeds into anticipatory intelligence,
trying to predict people's behaviors.
That's one of the reasons why they're looking at it
and mining information about people's politics and their religion.
As I've said many times, what the Internet has brought
to the people who control us, for the longest time,
they've had the ability to propagandize us you go back to the early 20th century it was the newspapers they
could you know as hearst said you know let me know who you want the war i'll get it for you
essentially paraphrasing and so they were able to create wars they were able to create boom and bust
cycles that way just like the um the bankers could, but affect public opinion with
propaganda. They got better once they got radio. It got even more visceral when they got television.
But all of those things were still just one-way communication. So they'd have to try to conduct
opinion polls and try to figure out if people were believing them, that type of thing. Now,
with the internet, they have the bots,
which can also manipulate opinion,
but they can scrape opinion off of the internet.
It's all there for them to look at.
And they can close the loop on feedback,
which is what you want to do.
If you've got a very sophisticated system,
you want to see how your propaganda is working.
And so they put something out there and then they
monitor people's response to it they can fine tune that response and then with geospatial intelligence
they can see uh even more information in terms of data mining uh paypal you know is where musk
and peter teal began and then uh you know they both got involved, but especially Peter Thiel in creating Palantir.
And Palantir has been one of the premier data mining companies to try to predict behavior.
Been used by the military, has been used by law enforcement.
A lot of people have been using Palantir.
And very, very popular with the government.
Spencer Osborne, he says, funny to me when Uber drivers think that they're independent entrepreneurs,
LOL.
Yeah.
They're independent entrepreneurs and they've got,
um,
a knife to their throat and,
uh,
people are going to eliminate them in no time at all.
I always design.
Um,
yeah.
Uh,
electric Lotus made in China.
Yeah.
That's,
uh,
not really what we want.
It says Mark,
um,
MS,
PhD,
uh, doing that in my formerly small city too.
Huge apartment buildings packed in tight.
Crime is going through the roof.
That's right.
The whole point is population density for control.
And they don't care that the crime goes to the roof.
That just makes you more dependent on them and makes you stay in your house more, doesn't it? Austin, yes, most developers are stopping and doing apartments like crazy, like they
know that California is going to fail and push all the West to the center and East of
the USA.
I agree.
So we just have to understand what the trends are as best as we can and try to respond to
them.
So let's take a
look at what's going to be happening with the election next week. As I said, I'm voting for
number six. That is, it's my candidate right there. Vote for six, six for two. Brain freeze.
Joe Biden refers to the ongoing war in Iraq because that's where my son died. Yeah, he's had
a lot of interesting things to say, and this is the second time he's done it,
just a couple of months.
He said, we have this ongoing war in Iraq,
excuse me, in Ukraine.
And I'm thinking of Iraq because that's where my son died.
No, his son died of cancer in a hospital here in the U.S.
I mean, the most that they can do to try to cover for him
is to say that, well, he thinks that his son contracted the cancer from a burn pit in Iraq.
But that is not what he did not die in Iraq.
The president also made the claim back in October during a speech that he was having in Colorado.
And then he went on to make some equally crazy statements, saying Republicans want to get rid of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Medicare and Social Security.
This guy is so old and so senile, he's still using the same talking points that Democrats did decades ago.
That's what the Democrats were always doing, saying, yeah, the Republicans are going to kill Social Security.
Vote for me.
That's not anything that anybody is talking about except for Biden.
Republicans have not mentioned doing any cuts to Medicare and Medicaid.
That's a third rail. They they've been scared off of even talking about giving younger people an option to choose whether they want to be in Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security.
That was something that was floated for a while.
They would say that if you're under a certain age,
if you wanted to, you could opt out of the Ponzi scheme
and you could start putting money into an account that you would actually own,
an account that could be passed on to family.
If you passed away, whereas, you know, the Medicare Medicaid, social security is just a big,
um, um, entitlement program. And there's no money there with your name on it. You don't have
an account. Uh, that's, that's, uh, again, it's a Ponzi scheme scheme if ever there was one biggest ponzi scheme you've
ever seen when they picked the retirement age the first time they had social security
was in germany and otto von bismarck did it he picked the age of 65 because that was life
expectancy it was a lie from the beginning it was a ponzi scheme from the beginning yeah let's pick
the date which most of the people are going to be dead by. And as life expectancy has crept up, they say, well, you know, now we have an insolvency issue because people are actually collecting this stuff.
We never planned on them collecting any money from it, so let's boost it up a little bit more.
Cajun Times, thank you very much for the tip.
And I don't understand the note, but I'm sure you guys were talking amongst each other.
He was talking to Mustang, I think.
Yeah, the president also said the cost of groceries is high
because Putin is cutting off grain supplies.
Well, that did not happen.
It happened for like a day.
That hasn't had enough time to percolate through and it's now
been restored you know they had a truce and you know grain was still flowing out of ukraine ukraine
is one of the biggest places the producers of grain and so it was temporarily cut off at the
beginning but they quickly put into place a treaty a ceasefire that was violated this last week. They had a massive
drone attack on Russian ships in the Black Sea. And so Putin said, all right, that's it.
We're going to shut the Russian government. So we're going to shut down this. But that
has now been restored after a couple of days. He's
just making up this stuff one after the other. They're
in big trouble and they know it.
The Democrat Party is collapsing as if it was a completely bankrupt and corrupt institution, which it is.
Biden spent most of his speech accusing Republicans of trying to cut off or eliminate the two programs,
insisting that they plan to shut down the government if the president refused to cut or to eliminate the programs. But if you look at 538, which is Nate Silver's polls, as one headline
says, well, you know, it was just a couple of months ago, they said, oh yeah, the Republicans
are going to do pretty good in the House, but they got no chance of taking the Senate. And so they had it in the high 70s,
the probability that the Democrats were going to have control of the Senate.
Now within the last few weeks, it's pulled even.
And so 538 said GOP take over the Senate, about a 50% probability of it.
The next day, 51%.
The next day, 52%.
Now it's at 53%. It's going up.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar,
and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free
sports bet up to €10 if your
horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest
week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
Very, very rapidly.
They're so desperate about all this stuff
that they sent Obama to Georgia to campaign against
Herschel Walker that's how pathetic this is I mean Herschel Walker is not a
strong candidate he was handpicked by Trump you know Herschel Walker played
college football in Georgia but he was living in Texas and a couple years ago
Trump essentially recruited him,
went there and said,
hey, move to Georgia
so you can get your residency requirements
and run in 2022.
But again, he's a celebrity candidate.
They should have
and could have found somebody
who was going to be
a more effective spokesperson.
And of course,
his private life didn't matter
to Donald Trump. I mean,
who's got a more corrupt private life than Donald Trump? I don't think Herschel Walker
went on the Lolita Express and hung out with Jeffrey Epstein like Donald Trump did. But anyway,
that's how desperate the Democrats are, that they have to send Obama to go up
against Herschel Walker and Herschel Walker kind of held his own when he,
uh,
push back against what Obama said.
Um,
Obama said,
well,
you know,
he's a great football player,
but Hey,
you know,
and kind of dismissed that.
And,
um,
uh, Herschel Walker says, well, he forgot to. And, um, uh,
Herschel Walker says,
well,
he forgot to tell people,
um,
he forgot to tell people that I created one of the largest minority owned food
services companies in the U S.
Uh,
so I do sign the front of a check,
which he's probably never done except when he was in the white house.
He said,
I created businesses.
I sit on a publicly traded board.
So those are things that I've done outside of football.
And I'll put my resume against his rate resume.
I put it up any time of the day.
And I think I've done well said Walker.
Um, so, you know, he, um, he says, uh, Obama had gone down and said, uh, so, um, do you really
want him flying a plane?
I don't want Obama flying a plane.
And that was what, uh, what Herschel Walker says.
You weren't really want him to fly a plane.
I imagine people would be just as happy for me to fly, but I mean, why not?
Neither one of them knows how to fly a plane.
So put either one of them in the seat, right?
That's what we're doing with government, right? Either one of them know the constitution
or care about it if they do. No, I mean, when you go back and you look at, uh, Herschel Walker has
actually started companies and things like that. And we know where Herschel Walker got his money.
He got his money, uh, playing football. He got his money with his businesses.
He earned his money. Where did Obama get his money? Obama was a communist party community
organizer. He didn't make any money until he got into politics. And now he's somebody who's got a
net worth of over $70 million. How do you go from having zero income? How do you go on a public
salary? I mean, we know what he was making. He was making even as president, he was only making,
uh, $400,000 a year. And I say only, but how do you get to $70 million making $400 million a year
with a network? Um, you know, uh, come on seriously. If he didn't spend a penny and
probably didn't cause I gave him free food and free trips and everything, you know, free housing
there in the white house and so forth.
But still over eight years, he gets $3.2 million.
Where did the other $67 million come from?
He had a lower salary when he was a Senator.
He hadn't even lower salary when he was working in state government.
He had essentially no salary when he was a community organizer.
So where is that money coming from?
The 70 million.
Did Obama earn that? No, he didn 70 million did obama earn that no he
didn't he didn't earn that at all uh so but you know give him some credit because it really is
hard to get a net worth of 70 million dollars when you've got no income to explain for it right i
mean this is a guy who knows how to grease some palms in the back room uh a new atlanta journal
constitution poll that's the paper in Atlanta.
We used to call it, when we were back in North Carolina,
we used to call it the Atlanta Urinal and Constipation.
Because it was a liberal rag.
We called the Raleigh News and Observer.
We called that the Raleigh Noise and Disturber.
And so the Atlanta Urinal and Constipation poll
shows that the two of them are tied.
Warnick and Walker are tied at 45%.
Yeah, he's running against a pastor whose passion is abortion.
Think about that.
And whose passion is to kick people out of the apartment building that is owned by Ebenezer Scrooge Baptist Church,
which used to be Martin Luther King's church.
We just added the Scrooge to it
because they're kicking people out of the apartment building
that the church owns for as little as $25 in back rent,
evicting people.
Gavin Newsom is concerned about all this stuff.
He says Democrats are getting destroyed on messaging.
We're getting crushed on narrative, he said.
Well, you know, Gavin Newsom says we need to stop being on.
He says we're going to have to do better in terms of getting on the offense
and stop being on defense.
Well, I think Newsom has done that.
Newsom has been very offensive.
He's offended a lot of people.
Quite frankly, I think the Democrats have been highly effective at being offensive,
especially Newsom.
Newsom putting out these billboards everywhere, you know, saying, come here, we'll give you
an abortion.
Or, you know, you need to have an abortion because here's this Bible verse that says something about loving your neighbor,
something like that. It's like, what? Yeah, Newsom's been on the offense and been offensive.
He says, look, I mean, I could be a cheerleader, but I'm also pragmatic and you can just feel
what's happening now. Wow. Even Newsom can't find a silver lining in this.
He says, these guys on the other side are ruthless, ruthless.
He said, where are we?
Where are we organizing bottom up a compelling alternative narrative?
Well, you've been putting your alternative narratives out through social media
and censorship, right? How's that working out for you, Newsom? People understand when they're being
lied to. They understand when they're being manipulated. We're not as stupid as you Democrats
think. Where are we going on the offense every single day? They're winning right now, he said, said Newsom.
Many Democrats are urging members of their party to refocus their message and lean more
into economic issues than relying on issues like abortion, says The Hill.
The Hill said that.
The Hill says some of the Democrats are leaning into economic issues.
Is that their strong point?
This is the economy, stupid.
And it is one stupid economy that the Democrats have created.
I don't think that's going to work out too well for them.
As offensive as it is, you know, instead of the economy, the only thing they've got to sell
is murdering babies and mutilating kids, you know, the transgender agenda and abortion.
That really is what they have to offer that's different. They don't have a clue about the
economy. And if you think they've got a clue, then that means that what they have done is deliberate.
It wasn't by accident.
And that is the problem.
In my view, while abortion issue must remain at the front burner, it would be political malpractice for Democrats to ignore the state of the economy.
And so who is it that's saying this?
Well, I'll finish the rest of it the way he would say it.
It will allow Republican lies and distortions to go unanswered yeah bernie sanders said that
yeah uh the republican lies are going to go unanswered we got to go on the offense we got
to go on the economy you know because bernie sanders is an old commie and he's happy with
what's going on. Look at this.
Yeah.
Like nationalize the economy here.
Yeah.
We're running it like a Soviet union.
Aren't you proud of us?
Or Hugo Chavez, right?
Well, Democrats keep falling for superstar losers.
This is another article from the Atlantic, uh, the globalist publication that was just the last week talking about how we need to forget and forgive what these people have done to us over the last couple of years.
And we just need to move on with amnesty.
And now they're saying Democrats keep falling for superstar losers.
And there, as the poster children for superstar losers, who do we see but Beto and Stacey Abrams.
Robert Francis O'Rourke, the man who is the first trans-Hispanic, that's what I used to always call him when he was running for office,
and he's run for so many offices and lost every time, failing upward most of the time.
Well, I lost for that office. let me run for a higher one and lose
there as well uh in the early 2000s says the atlantic the japanese racehorse han urara became
something of an international celebrity there was it was not because of her prowess on the track
just the opposite this racehorse had never won a race.
She was famous for not winning, but for losing.
It's kind of like the Chicago Cubs of horse races.
And the longer her losing streak stretched, the more famous she grew.
She finished her career with a perversely pristine record
of zero wins and 113 losses.
American politics doesn't have anyone quite like Haru Uraro,
but it does have Beto O'Rourke and Stacey Abrams.
So we talk about the horse race aspect of elections and politics,
because that's typically what most of the mainstream media likes to talk about.
You know, polls and horse races.
Um, and you know, I got the horse right here. His name is Paul Revere.
I like to talk about all the guys and dolls and how they're going to, um, you know, the sure thing,
I got a sure thing right here. See, I got a poll that shows this horse can't lose uh but even atlantic is blowing the whistle on beto o'rourke and um yeah i used
to call him beto male because that's what he was he was a beta male and a trans hispanic robert
francis o'rourke who calls himself beto everywhere new york times as i pointed out yesterday but
there's a more of a detailed article about it on Breitbart.
I mentioned it briefly about how Lee Zeldin was getting the Orthodox Jew vote in New York.
But it was not just because of the Democrat Party and some policies, but it's actually tied in.
I didn't realize this when I talked about it yesterday.
It's actually tied into. I didn't realize this when I talked about yesterday. It's actually tied into the New York Times. The New York Times decided that they would attack the Orthodox Jews and their schools.
They said, look at this.
You know, they're getting government money.
We don't like what they're teaching their people.
They need to be teaching CRT racism and Marxism, and they need to be teaching the LGBT stuff.
And you know they're not doing that in the Orthodox Jew schools, right?
They're teaching anything but that. That is antithetical to that. LGBT stuff. And you know, they're not doing that in the Orthodox Jew schools, right? Uh,
they're teaching anything but that,
uh,
that is antithetical to that,
but they wanted to force them to do that or take their money away.
And so as this was happening,
uh,
and this is a large voting block of about a million people.
And,
um, so in New York.
So Breitbart interviewed some of the people there
about what's going on with Zeldin
because as this started happening,
Zeldin did a couple of different speeches to the community,
had packed audience because they were angry about this.
This goes back to September, this article that was in
the New York Times. And as I point out, Lee Zeldin, who's running against Kathy Hochul in New York for
governor, held two back-to-back rallies in Brooklyn on Sunday, packed with hundreds of onlookers and
supporters wearing black hats or modest dresses with children in tow and crowds of religious
Jews gathered in the Borough Park and Williamsburg neighborhoods to give a hero's welcome to
the man they pray will be the next governor of New York, galvanized by the recent hit
piece in the New York Times targeting their children's religious education. The New York Times story,
which again goes back to a few weeks ago,
as Breitbart says,
gave a distorted, deranged hit piece,
ignoring relevant sources,
omitting information to produce outrageous allegations about tens of thousands of people
with little to no basis.
However, the story quite successfully marshaled the Democrat-run state government against
religious Jewish private schools.
The day after the Times story ran, the New York Board of Regents held a unanimous vote
without a debate to regulate the yeshivas in New York state, allowing state functionaries
heavier say in the education of Orthodox children.
So in other words, if we give you the money, we're going to attach the strings to it.
We're going to tell you what you can teach.
This is why you don't want to take the money.
I had this debate all the time when we started homeschooling our kids and we'd get onto these
early Facebook pages and stuff about that.
And they were all saying, you know, we need to get, uh, education credits in North Carolina.
I said, no, you don't.
I said, uh, you can be careful if you put your kids in a sporting, um, uh, program,
do your own, do your own.
Don't get involved in their system.
Don't take their money because they're going to use that to assert control over your life.
Uh, stay away from it so the draconian move was a shot heard in the Orthodox communities they were very angry about it they said you look you
know we don't really buy into the policies we have relationships with
different politicians so I don't really care about Chuck Schumer as long as he
listens to us
and he does things that we want him to do, they said. They said, that's how we have decided that
we're going to vote in the past. But what they said was, after this happened with the New York
Times, and then the next day, the Board of Regents says, yeah, we're going to, I don't like what
they're being taught, so we're going to force a different curriculum on
them. They said, we heard nothing but silence from all these politicians that we thought we
had a relationship with. Now you and I don't do it that way. We don't have a big block and we can't
get a personal relationship with people. So I focus on the policies that they do.
But you know, again, it is much more effective for them
to have a personal relationship with people
because the policies are just what they say when they're running
and then they don't follow through on it.
We saw that.
We see that with everybody, especially Trump.
This one guy that they talked to, his name is Jacob Rosenberg,
he said, parental rights and education is an existential
issue. And he's right. And the sad thing is that they understand it, we don't. We should understand
that as well. That's why I'm mentioning this. This is much bigger than an issue of Democrat and
Republican, Orthodox Jews and their private yeshivas or private institutions. We need to all understand this.
We need to all understand that parental rights and education is a hill to die on.
It really is.
Why?
Because the schools are killing our kids.
They're killing our society.
They're killing our family.
The schools are killing our culture.
The kids are being attacked physically and spiritually and mentally in our schools.
It is an attack on our children, our families, our society, our culture, our religion, on everything. We need to get our kids out of these schools and we need to shut these schools
down, these government schools.
And we need to not take the money.
And some of these people are starting to realize this.
And some of them are saying, well, you know,
this is such an important issue that even if we can't get the Democrats to,
you know, give us vouchers or, you know, educational choice or whatever,
if they, if they say, well, we don't like what you're teaching,
you're going to teach the gender curriculum
and the transgender stuff, you're going to teach that
or we're not going to give you any money.
They said, fine, we won't take the money.
And at some point we have to have those principles
to say I can't be bought.
That's what the game of scruples is all about.
We used to, when we'd get together in our thirties and play games with friends and stuff,
we'd look at it and say, you know, game of scruples is nothing about, they keep asking
you the same types of questions over and over again with different dollar amounts.
Well, will you do it for this much? How about this much? What if I go up on the price? Would
you do that? All these things are variations on that.
We have to understand there is going to be no freedom of religion
without freedom of education.
And we need to understand there's not going to be any freedom of any kind
without the freedom of education.
It is fundamental.
It is fundamental.
And he used to always try to make that point with the thomas jefferson
uh reenactor from williamsburg whether i was at williamsburg or whether he came down to raleigh
to speak at some organization i would always get up and say you know you're very good about
establishing religious liberty and you did it because you said it's wrong to compel people to participate in a religion that they don't agree with.
And it's wrong to compel people to financially support a religion and beliefs that they don't agree with.
And I said, and yet you support public institution of education.
I said, do you not realize that you're going to wind up in the same place?
Now, it's easier for us to see that in retrospect than it was for him to see it moving forward,
but it's exactly the same thing.
We need to have the same type of approach to this.
We need to have some kind of a document about educational liberty in the same way that Jefferson was careful to make sure they had no
government-established religion. The government-established religion is secular humanism
and is moving to transhumanism. And it is established religion that is established
through the institutions we call public schools. And for the longest time, I mean, you go back and you look at the parallel. When I was a
child, we had compulsory attendance laws, just as these established state churches and the 13
original states, most of them had compulsory attendance laws. If you lived in Maryland,
you go to a Catholic church. If you lived in New England, many times you'd go to a congregational church.
If you lived in Rhode Island, it was a Baptist church, and on and on.
So they would have compulsory attendance laws.
But even the more liberal of them, if they didn't compel you to attend the church,
they still compelled you to pay the church.
That's what establishment is.
It's not somebody who's a football coach
praying on the football field. That's not establishment. That's the free exercise of
his religion, his beliefs. And he's free to do that. And the Supreme Court just upheld that
for a football coach that was fired for doing that. So the free exercise of religion is not
what we're talking about. We're talking about forcing people to attend a church and forcing people to pay it.
We have established our official secular religions through the schools.
They've taken the same.
These institutions have become the same as the established churches at the time our country was founded.
And we need to end that.
Need to end it.
Anyway, thank you, Jacqueline Hogan.
Thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin.
She writes, New Jersey 101.5 has a story on their Twitter entitled,
Rutgers Story, Why Are Babies Dying Within One Week of Birth?
Yeah, quite the mystery, isn't it?
Yeah, when I get to vaccines,
Pfizer is running trials right now for its RSV vaccine.
RSV is the new fashion.
It's one of the things that they're pushing for because it's a respiratory flu-like disease
and can't tell RSV from the flu,
can't tell the flu from COVID and all the rest of the stuff, but Hey,
you know, we've got to vaccinate people.
So nobody gets a cold anymore.
They're trying to sell this as a cure for the common cold,
all these different vaccines.
And you'll have a gazillion.
They'll be able, if they, if we keep going down this road,
you'll have a vaccine for every strain of the flu that they can imagine.
You'll have a vaccine for every strain of COVID that they can imagine.
And for RSV and
you name it. You're going to wind up with dozens of vaccines for sniffles. But right now, Pfizer
is doing its trials so they can bring out this vaccine very quickly, the RSV. And they're focusing
on pregnant women, pregnant women. And their justification for that is that, um, the RSV is affecting infants. So we
got to inoculate them before they're born. Wait a minute. I thought there was just a clump of
cells. I didn't think that they had it. Yeah. All of this, just insidious what they're doing.
Um, so anyway, um, the, uh, this is a combination, the New York Times and the Democrats
decided that they would attack this group
that has always voted Democrat.
And now they're going to lose
about a million votes.
And we can just sit back and laugh at it.
But again, one person
said, you know, at least,
and this is kind of interesting. They said, you know, at least, and this is kind of interesting.
They said, you know, regardless of whether there's anything they can do.
And we understand, you know, Lee Zeldin is governor.
If he's got Democrats controlling every other branch of government and every other level of government in the state, there's not much that he can do.
Right. that he can do. Right? So she said, uh, Lee Zeldin spoke out.
Kathy Hochul didn't, regardless of whether there's anything that they can do.
Lee Zeldin at least pretended to care.
He spoke up.
Kathy Hochul dropped the ball.
She was silent.
She wasn't even there.
And, uh, that's what I've always said. If you, um, as candidate, the key thing, like we saw with Trump,
the key thing is to tell people, I understand what your problems are,
and I agree with you that this is a problem and it needs to be fixed.
But then when you get elected, you've actually got to do something.
But, of course, the thing that they're upset about is that Kathy Hochul
is not doing anything except working against them. One person said, I'm not a big voter. I'm not into politics
in a big way. I just do like to understand things, said the man. But absolutely, I am going to be
voting probably only for the second time in my life. And people are getting, you know, this is
this particular community because they're coming after their kids and their school and that type of thing.
But there's a lot of people who are getting energized like this because of the economy.
As a matter of fact, when you look at what is happening with white females, white suburban females.
The Democrat, they have swung completely the other direction now
in just the first two years of Biden.
Wall Street Journal poll shows that white suburban women
are backing the GOP by a margin of 15 percentage points.
A new survey shows white women living in suburb areas who make up about 20% of the electorate
now favor Republicans by 15 points, moving 27 points away from the Democrats since their
last poll in August.
The poll showed that 54% of white suburban women think the U.S. is already in recession.
And 74% say that's the most fundamental thing that happens to us, right? So, you know, when we look
at this, it is the economy that is happening again. And they talked to one woman, 68 years old, in California,
a registered independent.
She said she's never before voted straight Republican.
But she said, right now, I feel the Democrats are ruining our country.
We are on fixed income, and the price of gas is unbelievable.
They said white suburban women were a powerful force in the Democrats' sweeping victories in 2018 midterms
when they gained more than 40 seats.
And now it's going the opposite direction.
So the person said, well, generally, I think I would trust the Democrats more on social issues,
but Republicans more on monetary issues.
And now this is about the money.
So just from August till today,
in August, if they asked them,
using Trump and Biden as representatives
of these two things,
would you vote for, if they were running right now,
would you vote for Biden or Trump?
In August, 55% of these white suburban women
would have voted for Biden.
So Biden 55, Trump 39.
Today, it's the other way around.
52 for Trump, 41 for Biden.
It's amazing.
One person, as the article talks about this,
Wall Street Journal, they say abortion could play a bigger role
in some states, such as Michigan,
where the November ballot includes a question for voters about whether or not to provide a state constitutional right to abortion.
Do you understand how thoroughly bankrupt financially and morally the Democrats are?
They're morally bankrupt.
Their only issue, they can't talk about the economy.
They can't talk about anything else.
Their only issue is depravity and murder, mutilation and murder of children, mutilating
them genitally, mutilating them psychologically and spiritually.
If they can't murder them in the womb I showed you that video yesterday I mean you know is it can the Republicans not get the
you know stir up enough backbone to defend life when they are ripping babies
apart limb by limb alive and as I've pointed out before,
when they do their transhumanist,
their chimeras that they create,
their humanized mice for their disgusting experiments,
how do they get those organs to create the humanized mice?
Well, they cut the baby up while the baby's alive.
That's how they harvest those organs for them.
I mean, if we can't push back against that,
if we've got to cower and try to,
well, let's not talk about abortion.
Let's get over here on the economics issue.
If we can't push back against this,
we deserve to have everything taken away from us.
Tudor Nixon is coming after Gretchen Witcher.
She's so much a witch.
I always call her Witcher.
Gretchen Witcher, Whitmer,
over what she did during lockdown.
And it's about time
somebody nailed these tyrants over this.
But never forget,
Trump gave her the money
and kept giving her the money, just giving, giving her the money. Just like
he kept giving the money to Gavin Newsom and Cuomo and to the Republicans like the wine and Brad
little, he kept funding them for the lockdown stuff. Uh, she said, uh, uh, Tudor Nixon, who
was running against Whitmer said Whitmer shut everything down over and over again. She had
restaurants closed down for eight months in the state of Michigan. We lost 3,000 restaurants.
We are still losing restaurants every single day.
There are whole towns that have been destroyed by the shutdown.
Dixon recalled this moment while describing the damage to children's education
driven by Whitmer's closure of public schools.
She said, a key moment in the debate, I think,
was when she came out and kind of smiled with a sideways smirk
and said, schools in Michigan were only closed for three months.
That was a moment where people were immediately taken back
as to what actually did happen.
On statewide TV, says Dixon,
people were able to see that really, truly, she doesn't have
a plan. She didn't care. She shrugs it off and laughs it off, the fact that our kids are so far
behind. We know that the choice was to lock kids out of school because that was what the teachers
unions wanted. The teachers unions are not there for the kids, said Dixon.
Gretchen Whitmer is completely beholden to the teachers' unions.
That's why our kids are so far behind.
That's why our reading scores just got back from spring.
Nearly 60% of third graders across the state failed reading and writing.
That is catastrophic.
She said, in Detroit, we have
nearly a 90% illiteracy rate. Illiteracy. Well, what do we do about that? Because you just admitted
the failed schools and these illiteracy rates have been extremely high. They've only ticked
up just a few more points with these lockdowns.
They were already extremely high because there was never any intention of teaching the kids to read and write.
Why can't Johnny read?
Well, because Johnny is contemplating his genitals and he's being given kiddie porn and all the rest of this stuff.
They don't want to do that.
It's been a program going back 40 years of deliberately
dumbing down kids in America. That's what the federal government's involvement in education
has always amounted to. That's why Charlotte Iserby's book, you know, deliberately dumbing
us down. That's what it was about. She went there to shut down the Department of Education that
Reagan said he was going to do but instead he grew it and so
we don't have kids who can read or write because they're being taught a baskin and robbins kind of
gender fable you know pick pick one of these flavors of gender look at how many we've got
you know when we had not 90 illiteracy illiteracy but we had not 90% illiteracy, but we had over 90% literacy, you know when that happened in the U.S.?
Well, we had that back in 1776.
We had that when people were being homeschooled.
We had that when people didn't spend the first 18 years of their life in a government institution to make them helpless.
You know, they'd go to school for a few years and they'd get out in the real world and start learning things, learn how to read and write and a few things like that.
If they wanted to go a little bit longer because they were going to be a lawyer or a doctor or something like that, they would get a different type of education.
But we had a 90% literacy rate. That's one of the reasons why books like Thomas Paine's Common Sense,
that's why they had such influence, because everybody was reading it.
Today, you wouldn't be able to have that kind of influence with any kind of book.
You would have to do a documentary or something that people could watch
because people don't process that
type of thing anymore. But going back to this analogy, I'm glad that Tudor Dixon is criticizing
Whitmer for the lockdown stuff. And Whitmer, yes, is arrogant and detached and doesn't have a plan
except for the Great Reset. But does Tudor Dixon understand what the real problem is?
She admits that the teachers' unions are only caring about themselves.
They have no interest whatsoever in the education of the kids.
They're just there to pick up a paycheck,
and if they can do that without working, they're all for it.
Why would you turn your kids over to that?
Why would you propagate a system like that?
More importantly, why don't we ask these Republicans
why you were so adamant
about getting the kids back in school? Let's shut these things down. There's a world of difference
between schooling and education. They're not the same thing. You can go to school forever
and not get an education, right? We know people like that. We all do.
We know career students who've hung out in school for the longest time and never learned anything.
Totally useless to themselves and other people.
So a school is not an education.
And we need to rethink education from the ground up.
And we need to get rid of these parasitic institutions that are destroying our society.
That's what these schools are.
I say keep them shut down forever and defund them.
That's what I'd be saying if I was in the debate.
That's why I'm not running for office here.
So she said, Whitmer will look in the face of every Michigander and lie and say that
she is preserving the automotive industry.
Michigan is losing automotive and it's just a sign of how we treat businesses in general.
You've got Ford and GM saying it's just too hard to do business in the state.
We have a regulatory system that is out of control.
It is crushing the automotive industry.
It's crushing all of our smaller businesses as well. Ford has decided to spend $11 billion on its new plants to produce electric
vehicles, and they're going to move those plants to Kentucky and Tennessee.
But we need to ask, what is the bigger picture here?
The bigger picture is, yes, the regulatory environment in Michigan is horrific.
And that's why if they're going to build any new plants,
they're not going to build them in that state.
But we need to address what I've been talking about this whole program,
which is the forced banning of transportation.
It's not even defending internal combustion.
And he said,
I don't care what kind of engine people have.
I want the freedom to be able to have private transportation.
That's why I oppose this stuff.
The battery-operated electric vehicles running off of the control grid
is a trap.
It's nothing but a trap.
To destroy our society, destroy our transportation,
our freedom of mobility.
So she said, we have a small window of time to try to bring things back,
and that's what we'll do as soon as we get Gretchen Whitmer out of office.
Well, I hope so.
She seems to be intelligent, but she doesn't seem to get the big picture.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by the way, has now stepped in
and put a stop to what was developing to be another one of these voting scams.
Undated, wrongly dated ballots will not be counted.
Lower courts had said, no, we're going to count those.
Anything.
You got a piece of paper here that says Democrat?
We'll take it.
So the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has said no.
If it is undated, if it is incorrectly dated, they will be separated out and we'll deal with that at a later date.
But right now, you're not going to count them, they said.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Stay with us. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right.
And we've got Dick on Rockfin who says,
bottom line, we need to find our inner Amish.
Is it okay to say that on Rockfin?
Yeah, I think so.
I agree.
I agree.
They have it down.
That's what I've been saying.
You know, you've got these communities who have, you know,
they may dress in a very strange way,
the Orthodox community and the Amish community.
They have some traditions that we might look at and say, well, that's kind of strange, but
they are focused on their family and they are focused on, they understand what is harmful
influence into their society and they're going to keep it out and they're going to protect their
families. We need to live cell phone and automobile free, grow food collectively in our own community,
not allow anybody to inject anything into our body or into our animals, make music and
praise God.
Simple.
I agree.
That is, that should be the goal.
I would agree with that.
Uh, well then on the other hand, you know, if you do watch television, you're going to
see this type of thing as we're talking about earlier with Tony, I said, yeah, we're going
to wind up talking about the Jim Cramer economies
of all these failed corporations that he just...
Last week, he was tearfully saying to people,
I'm sorry, I got completely fooled by Facebook.
Well, he's done that a lot of times.
First time he's apologized for it.
But he keeps saying crazier and crazier things.
And then they had this back and forth on CNBC
as they were talking about the zero COVID policies of China.
Also, you know, the other benefit for President Xi
of having all these COVID controls
is that you are very, very easily able to track people.
And that's another big benefit for this regime.
Right. Yeah. The power
of the state, there's no doubt. Eunice, thank you for that.
We mentioned before we went to Eunice
some of the video that came out of Shanghai
Disney Gym where they had to suspend
operations to comply with the prevention
measures, but literally
kept people in the park until
they came back with a negative
test. Just astounding.
Was it pre-test over 24 hours or something?
Yeah, well, because you get it.
I mean, look, I had a PCR test with someone at 10,
and they gave it to me by 5, so I don't think that's wrong.
Let's just go back over.
I mean, I think she propagandists, you know,
I call that person a dissembler, so to speak.
But, I mean, they have a narrative,
which just says basically you can conquer COVID by just being locked down.
And this has to change the narrative to being, you know what's even better?
Our homegrown mRNA, which I am told is simply that they managed to get the intellectual property, stole it, which is good.
When I say good, because it's better to have mRNA than not.
Let's just say they appropriated it.
And they've got to deal with
what do you do if you told people the way to beat this
is no vaccine, and now you have a vaccine.
So I think what you need is a propaganda.
Outside of the state infrastructure.
Exactly. To start moving political opinion.
But I think when we think of propaganda, we think about
the regimes that we didn't really appreciate you might be silent i am silent i'm just thinking about those poor
people stuck at disney shanghai disney for it's i mean it's the worst places to be stuck
it's a real small world after all guys we'll get to the yeah it's going to be a real small world
if people like jim Cramer get their way.
They need a propagandist, you know, from the outside of the government.
Like I said, is he auditioning for a job?
He sounds like he'd be happy to work for the Chinese.
No problem at all.
Because I think people in America have had enough of it, quite frankly.
So, yeah, let's just change the narrative.
We don't want to keep going on with this lockdown because, you know, that might cost us some economic issues and everything.
So let's just make everybody get the vaccine.
And, you know, they've got it now.
They stole it, which is a good thing, he says.
That's always been part of the China price theft.
Theft of intellectual property, as well as slave labor, as well as currency manipulation.
And I imagine Jim Cramer approves of all of those, all of the, oh yeah, that's all good.
That's all good.
As long as I know about it and I can make money out of it somehow, except that his advice
doesn't make money.
As I said the other day, last week, it was before, uh, Pelosi, Paul Pelosi was, uh, you
know, whatever happened to him, they attacked or whatever. But I said, uh, yeah, everybody knows you do the opposite of what Jim Kramer says.
And you buy and trade the stocks that, uh, Paul Pelosi buys and trades. There's actually several
people that have been dedicated to following his stuff. And he hasn't actually, he hasn't
had a good track record lately. I think maybe with all
this drunk driving and all these other things happening and Nancy may not be talking to him as
much. Uh, so yeah, let's just say they appropriate it. You know, well, what do you do if you tell
people the way to beat it is no vaccine, now I got a vaccine. So, you know, what you need is a
propagandist and I'm available. So, um, the other people that were there uh just went silent you know what what do you say
to somebody that is uh that stupid that authoritarian as a matter of fact um just
take a look at what is happening there was a article from the uk daily skeptic they said
as a lockdown bill comes due,
and they're talking about the economic effects of it,
the public demands even more restrictions,
if you can believe the online poll from YouGov.
They said a Treasury source has claimed
that tax increases across the border
needed to plug the 50 billion pound fiscal hole left by Liz Truss's disastrous tenure.
They said, really?
You mean she was only there for 45 days and she left them with a 50 billion pound hole?
That's more than a billion dollars a day.
I mean, she's spending money pretty fast clip.
No, they're trying to, isn't that amazing?
Here's somebody, the shortest time anybody's ever been prime no, they're trying to, isn't that amazing?
Now here's somebody, the shortest time anybody's ever been prime minister. And they're trying to put this whole thing off onto her.
Almost makes you feel sorry for her.
Almost.
She's a statist as well.
Um, anyway, uh, the source continued after borrowing hundreds of billions of dollars,
hundreds of billions of pounds through COVID-19 spending,
cuts alone will not be enough.
So one person replies and says,
well, this kind of reminds me of that Fawlty Towers episode
where Basil argues with an unruly guest
who's been complaining about the view from her room.
He says, may I ask you what you were expecting to see
out of a 4K hotel bedroom window?
Sydney Opera House, perhaps?
The Hanging Gardens of Babylon?
And so he says, could I ask these people
what they expected after they shuttered the entire economy
for the thick end of two years,
printing money to pay millions of people to
stay home.
During lockdown, the electric was led to believe that we could borrow endlessly without any
consequences, that money printing was nothing at all to worry about, and that somebody else
would foot the bill if necessary.
The whole period didn't just cross a Rubicon and what the state believed they could get away with it.
It irrevocably transformed how people view the state. And there remains an odd amnesia
about the whole period. Tweet out earlier this morning. I said, yeah, all these people want to
talk about amnesty. No, what they want is amnesia. And I'm afraid we got too much of it already.
They don't want amnesty. They want amnesia. They don't want you to remember what happened.
They really don't. Uh, you know what? And they have jumped on board this thing with both feet.
A YouGov survey this week shows a lingering authoritarianism that perhaps some of those who
are naive about trade-off. When asked about the potential return of COVID measures, 42%
of respondents supported the return of social distancing, while 20% wanted to reimpose the rule of six immediately.
That's an interesting way to put it.
I like that better than social distancing.
Um, I like the rule of six because again, it harkens back to our picture here of a number
six and the prisoner, he was a prisoner.
They gave it, they take away his name and gave him a number.
And that number was six.
And then they would not tell him anything about themselves or anything else.
And so I can't, you know, when I think of the rule of six, I think about how these people
rule us as if we were prisoners in some kind of a dystopian, uh, fantasy village.
Yeah.
The rule of six, they said over 60% in the poll wanted mask mandates on public transportation.
Taking the subway to work.
I see, he says, I see no more than one or two masked faces per week.
Of course, he's in the UK, so he says he's taking the tube.
So he says on that, he only sees about one or two people wearing face masks each week.
So he says, why don't more of the public just wear them if it means that much to them?
He says, perhaps it's because the real attraction isn't so much about reducing transmission, but about controlling other people's lives.
That's the real fascination about all of this.
So he said, many MPs and pundits
having vociferously opposed
irresponsible,
uncosted tax cuts
now condemn planned spending cuts
with equal vigor.
There's absolutely no fat left
to trim, they say.
I know, he says,
that this is a YouGov poll,
and so, you know,
you can take it with a grain of salt
nevertheless he said it's astounding that even on that you'd have 75 of the people want the return
of mandatory isolation for sick people and that 65 of mandatory testing for the symptomatic. 49% want masks enforced in all indoor spaces versus just 43%
against. The vaccine program remains popular as well with 71% saying that they would likely
take a booster if offered one this winter, including 63% of 25 to 49 year olds who have
no risk from this really, who aren't being offered one.
However, perhaps an indication of how skewed the poll is, is that while 89% of over 65s
say that they're likely to get an autumn booster, the actual booster rate in that age group is
flattening out at about 70%. But again, when we look at this, it reminds me of this meme here.
Look at this one from the Nazis.
Everybody thinks when they think about living in Nazi Germany that they're going to be
Oskar Schindler.
But COVID has shown that most people would support the Nazis.
And that's the same thing we're seeing from this U.gov poll.
As a matter of fact, let's hope that this is a push-pull.
Because do you really want to go back to the kind of authoritarian existence that we see with this?
Look at this.
This is one person saying, never forget that this happened.
All these people want amnesty.
This is a funeral.
And there's a son moving his chair closer to the mother at this funeral to comfort her.
And here you have this authoritarian jerk come out and say,
get apart, get apart.
He gets close to them to tell them to move apart.
Forces them to move apart so he can't comfort his mother at this funeral.
She's got to sit by herself six feet apart.
Isn't that amazing?
Do you ever want to go back to that kind of authoritarianism again?
How in the world could we to that kind of authoritarianism again?
How in the world could we support that type of thing?
It just is beyond me to see how anybody could support that.
And yet you see on these polls a big plurality of people who want to return to that type of thing.
As a matter of fact, as we talk about
all of this amnesty stuff,
we've got to fight the amnesia.
Remember,
and I tweeted this out as well,
somebody said,
this is a year ago,
this is in New York City,
and they called the police
on this kid
who was there
to celebrate his birthday.
So never forget this.
A big gang of police,
the gang up on this young kid
who was having his birthday party.
Again, like the new premier of Alberta said,
the unvaccinated, the unmasked, the most discriminated against in history.
Look at this.
Look at how many cops there are.
Let's kick this kid out because he's not wearing a mask.
Wow.
Scaring a child.
Traumatizing a child.
Hope you feel good about yourself, NYPD.
Look at that.
Same city where people are getting...
This is gross.
You guys failed us last night.
You failed us last night.
It's so much easier coming in and pushing a kid, a little kid around with a mask,
than it is to go out there and take on actual criminals, isn't it?
Disgraceful.
You failed.
You failed yourself, NYPD.
You failed yourself.
Is this what you signed up for?
Yeah, it is, actually.
They want to collect a paycheck just like the teachers.
They don't want to teach the kids.
They don't want to protect the kids.
They want to harass the kids.
They want to collect a paycheck.
Richard Williams, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that on a rock fit.
And he writes, the government has sold war much like they have sold the genetic code injection.
If you don't get the jab, you're not a good American.
That's right.
Or if you are not gung-ho to kill people somewhere else in the world, you're not a good American.
You're either with us or you're against us.
Which is it?
Yeah.
We need to develop the mentality that there is nothing honorable about a flag-draped casket of war
unless that war threatened the natural rights of Americans.
Well, yes, we have to go back to the Christian understanding of war.
It goes back to Augustine, the just war.
Now we only just have war, right? But we don't have a justified war. Now we only just have war, right?
But we don't have a justified war.
A just war means that you were attacked.
A just war means that you're defending innocent life.
A just war means that you try to limit civilian casualties.
That's why we wear uniforms.
And a just war means that once you've neutralized the threat, you stop.
We don't do any of those things.
We used to, as recent as World War II,
when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor,
even though FDR had done everything he could to provoke it
and to provoke the Germans,
the Germans said, well, we're not going to fall for that,
but the Japanese did.
They thought, well, you know, they're going to win unless we can have a kill strike preemptively.
So let's go ahead and do that.
It was calculated from a military standpoint.
It made sense.
But it didn't make sense from a moral standpoint.
That's why FDR said it's a day that will live in infamy.
And yet that has been our policy.
We have acted pragmatically and immorally
ever since World War II ended. Thanks for joining us.
The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Thank you. you