The David Knight Show - 3Oct22 Cyborg Cockroaches Show Elites' Plan for Humanity

Episode Date: October 3, 2022

* A REAL hero, in a REAL emergency, celebrated then fired by Biden for not getting the jab* Blood on their hands — criminal persecution of journalist whistleblower exposes key members of the Biden Administration in murder-for-hire conspiracy and cover-up* Six big steps towards World War 3 in just one week. A rapid acceleration* Musk's AI Day: the phony demonstration has a VERY DISTURBING message and purpose* Cyborg Cockroach shows the elites' plan for humanity* FDA's latest cover-up of autopsies shows they knew what they were doing and will double down to protect themselves* BigPharma Bonanza: even the companies that didn't produce an mRNA genetic code injection will share in the bonanza of profits coming from the health crisis it unleashed* Veggie Tales characters are furious that Biden's first ever "ambassador to plants" was given to the wife of White House Chief of Staff instead of to a real vegetable (in the literal sense)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 3rd of October, Year of Our Lord 2022, Day 923 of the Emergency. Today we're going to talk about the escalation in Ukraine, several things happening there, as well as some cyber cockroaches. What does it tell us about what the ultimate plans are? Many people have said the only thing that's going to survive a nuclear war is going to be the cockroaches. Well, they're going to go with cyber cockroaches, and they're going to go with cyber cockroaches in order to be able to find us

in the rubble, they say. A lot of strange news today that we'll be covering. Stay with us. We'll Thank you. Well, I think this article takes the cake. And it pulls everything together. So many different themes that have been developing. You have Biden thinking a Coast Guard diver for risking his life, for saving other people's lives in Florida. But he's going to be dismissed in just a couple of days over the vaccine mandate. We're not going to recognize his religious liberty.

They turned down his appeal. So he's going to be kicked out after he kicked in doors to save people who were at risk of drowning. A person in a wheelchair, even took the wheelchair, saved the wheelchair for them. President Biden on Friday personally called to thank a Coast Guard rescue swimmer who is facing discharge over Biden's vaccine mandate. You see, there is no emergency for the pandemic. There is no pandemic, according to Biden.

But this guy is still going to be fired, There is no pandemic, according to Biden. But this guy is still going to be fired, even though he saved lives in an emergency. Biden bragged about calling the guy. And I wish the guy had not been so kind. He's got a religious exemption. He's probably Christian. He didn't want to call out Biden, he said, on the phone for his hypocrisy. No, call him out. Part of what we,

I believe we are called to call out evil and hypocrisy. And some people are doing that with Gavin Newsom as well. We'll talk about that coming up. says uh biden says i called him and told him how proud i was and thanked him for all the work he and his coasties are doing to save lives oh he's part of the group and he calls them coasties um it's uh aviation survival technician second class zach lesh is the guy they got the call. Despite Biden thanking Lesh for saving people's lives, Lesh is due to be kicked out of the Coast Guard in 30 to 60 days due to Biden's own mandate, denying religious freedom, of course. That all members of the U.S. Armed Forces be fully vaccinated.

Lesh had submitted a request for religious accommodation as well as an appeal. Both were denied. He said, if I'd asked any of the people I saved yesterday, if they wanted to come with me, even though I am unvaccinated, every single one of them would have said yes. So he had people, some who were trapped in their back, one trapped in the back bedroom with a couch, jammed in the doorway. He had to kick through a wall in order to free them. Had to go through the wall, not the door, like I said earlier. The door was blocked, wedged with things that had been pushed against it by the floodwaters. He said once they were free, he went back to retrieve her wheelchair,

securing it to his own body as he was hoisted up by the Coast Guard helicopter. Lesh also rescued several dogs and cats. He said he did not want to bring up his pending discharge to Biden, who is his commander in chief, and ruin the call. He says, but it just sucks that he thanked me, yet the vaccine mandate is what is kicking me out. I just love my job. I'm really good at it. It sucks. I feel like this is the job that I was born to do. Well, you also have a job, and he's doing it now. Whether you wanted to call out the hypocrisy or not,

the media is calling it out. God has shined a big spotlight on Biden's hypocrisy. Lala Harris is saying that communities of color must be favored for the relief funds in order to advance equity. Reminds me of the National Lampoon cover about 50 years ago when I was in college. It says, end of the world, women and minorities hardest hit. Nothing has changed, has it? And they're saying it's the end of the world with climate change. And of course, communities of color are the hardest hit.

So they're going to get the most hurricane relief funds, and they are going to get extra benefits that are needed to help them cope with the end of the world that's coming through climate change. You have, as Information Liberation points out, here's a headline. I think this is from the Washington Post. Whites are mainly to blame for air pollution, but blacks and Hispanics bear the burden, says a new study. See, there you go.

More white oppression. Yeah. The Biden regime is following the teachings of anti-racist activist Ibrahim X. Kendi. Born name is Henry Rogers. It's kind of like this guy who heads up the satanic temple. You know, he's got a pretty pedestrian name. And he invented one.

He said in his book, how to be an anti-racist, that white people need to be actively discriminated against in order to fight discrimination. That's right. War is peace. Slavery is freedom. And we want to discriminate racially in order to fight racial discrimination. The only remedy to racist discrimination is anti-racist discrimination, says Kendi.

The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination. Race war. That's what these people have pushed. That's what it was from the very beginning. You had Bernadine Dorn and Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground, and they latched on to what was then a new idea,

white skin privilege. They just reduced it to white privilege. But they stopped bombing buildings. You know, Bill Ayers, politically protected by his wealthy family and politicians who wanted to protect him, protected from murder charges, from terrorist charges, didn't go to jail, went into education, stopped bombing buildings, started bombing the minds of children into race, hatred, Marxism. They realized it was going to be far more effective in the U.S. to use race war rather than class warfare as the Marxists had done in Europe.

And of course, because they were protected, they were able to raise Cheza Boudin, whose parents did go to jail. It was a pretty clear cut and they didn't have the kind of connections. And so Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn raised Cheza Boudin while his parents were in prison. He was the San Francisco district attorney that got recalled. But the other guy, Gascon, he is so politically protected and savvy that he was able to get the board of elections to even shut down a recall election before it got there with an amazing gimmick of throwing out signatures,

throwing out about a third of the signatures. And even then, just enough signatures thrown out, a little bit over a third, to keep a recall election from coming up there in LA. Lala Harris promises equity in the hurricane recovery resources. She said, not everybody starts out at the same place. Well, of course and uh these people when they talk about equity they're not talking about equality of opportunity they're talking about equality of results which is communism equality of opportunity is liberty equality of results is authoritarian communism. That's what these people are talking about.

She celebrated her, the administration, the la-la Biden administration's $370 billion in climate spending. She said the crisis is real. The clock is ticking. The urgency in which we must act is without any question. I can imagine she just laughed at that point. She does all that. Biden would not only provide immediate aid in a way that can, where people can be resilient, not to mention adapt these extreme weather conditions that are going to be a part of

the future. So you get a climate bonus based on the color of your skin as well. Bill Maurer has suggested that Biden get rid of Lala Harris from the Democrat ticket. He said, I just think she's a bad politician. She is Lala stupid. And again, that happened at the end of the week last week after she went to the DMZ in Korea, talked about how we are allies, longtime allies of North Korea. He said, well, you know, the problem is you can't get the president out. And he says, it's really kind of strange that you've got all these people who are Democrats who say, yeah, I love what President Biden has done.

I just don't want him running again. He goes, that's kind of strange. But he goes, once you get somebody in there, it's hard to get them out. But maybe, you know, we could do is get rid of Lala. And he said, the problem is that's not going to happen either. He said, the problem for the Democrat party is they're so boxed in by identity politics, it'd be impossible for a ticket to not have either a woman, a person of color, or a deaf Eskimo. A deaf Eskimo would certainly be better than Lala Harris.

Biden, meanwhile, is very happy with her. He says, Lala won't be the last woman to be vice president or to be president. And if you think the identity politics is bad, just take a look at the nepotism. In the White House, they have wedded nepotism to absurdity by the appointment, as I mentioned briefly last week, I didn't realize at the time that the person that was appointed ambassador for plants and animals due to the crisis climate, I thought that was appointed ambassador for plants and animals

due to the crisis climate, I thought that was ridiculous and absurd as well. But I didn't realize the nepotism angle. It turns out that the person they put in as ambassador for plants is the wife of the White House Chief of Staff, Ron Klein. For the first time, the U.S. is designating a special diplomat to advocate for the global biodiversity amid what policymakers here and overseas increasingly recognize as an extinction crisis, said the Washington Post. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has designated Monica Medina as the U.S. Special Envoy for Biodiversity and Water Resources.

You see, that's one of the ways that they slow down the discovery of nepotism, but it only slowed it down by about a day or so. It's just like Fauci's wife, who amusingly is the head of bioethics in his department i guess that's why they have no bioethics he put his wife in uh the position so this is uh ron clain the uh biden chief of staff is his wife that gets put in plants and animals need a dedicated ambassador because of the current climate crisis well there you go um i guess it's not enough to uh to be vegan you got to have somebody who's a vegetable as well mentally a vegetable i wonder how long it's going to take Babylon B to do a story about some of the VeggieTale characters being very angry that they were passed over in terms of this diplomat, the plant world. I mean, what a bunch of fools. I guess, you know, people will vote for them.

Again, it's identity politics and it's partisan politics and nothing is going to change that. I don't even know what that is, said Dianne Feinstein. And she was not talking about the ambassador to plants. She's just not there anymore. Like Joe Biden. She's 89. And even the Democrats are talking about her mental state and how

she is not suitable to be there. Uh, she was not talking about the plan ambassador, which is what we were all saying, I don't even know what that is. No, she was talking about the continuing resolution for funding. Uh, she doesn't know what that is. She'll have to pass it to find out what's in it. According to Pelosi, I guess. Uh, so Democrats on Capitol Hill have in recent years expressed concern over the Senate's oldest member and her mental fitness to serve.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgambling p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Well, you know, now Diane Feinstein has been ethically and morally unfit to serve for a long time. And now she is mentally unfit to serve as well. But there's a lot of people who, you know, we're seeing all these businesses, as I've been talking about, especially small businesses, can't hire people. They use a lot more labor than the bigger businesses, and so they're feeling the crunch even more so. And I've talked about how I've talked to people who have restaurants, other services, say, yeah, we just cut back.

We don't do that type of service anymore because we can't get anybody to work with us. So we've reduced what we do, and we only have just the family members are doing it now. So there's a few people who do work. They work really hard. As a matter of fact, they work extra. Nearly 70% of Americans are looking for extra work in order to combat inflation. The rest of them are just kicking back, and they know that Biden's got it covered.

Just send the check in the mail. But these people are working really hard. They haven't been seduced by the universal basic income thing that is being pushed by the globalists. I spent a lot of time on Saturday on the rock fan show. In fact, it spent most of the show talking about Elon Musk's Optima robotics thing, because it's not even about that. It's not about that at all. Uh, that, that was a joke. All the robotics people say that it was, know it's just and clearly you can see it

um as a matter of fact here's what it looked like uh you see something coming out and look at how slow it's moving oh it can turn its wrist and it can stand there and it can take some very slow halting steps i pointed out on saturday it walks about like joe. It's very, very, very shaky. So, you know, you get the idea of what's going on here. That's a joke. It's a joke, but he's not really demonstrating robotics. What these guys are pushing are things like they're trying, that is a visual PR effort to sell you universal basic income to tell you the robots are going to take your job. So it's not going to necessarily be the biped robots. There's a lot of robots already in a lot of factories, but they're going to continue to escalate that. Yeah, look at that. It's

pathetic. Off-the-shelf components, he said. It can dance, he said, but we didn't want to try that because it might fall. Yeah, well. But no, what they're want it. It can dance. He said, but we didn't want to try that because it might fall. Yeah. Well, uh, but no, what they're really pushing is universal basic income. And, um, it came at the end of a week that, uh, maybe you didn't know it, but it was, uh, basic income week. I talked about this. Yeah. Look at that. The 15th international Basic Income Week.

2022 was last week. And there were events and papers and seminars and symposiums all over the world talking about how they could do universal basic income. And, of course, Elon Musk was one of the biggest supporters of Andrew Yang, whose singular issue at the very beginning was universal basic income. They want you to get accustomed to the idea that these things are going to take your jobs. But it's really going to be a lot of other more specialized looking robots, the practical ones, are not the ones that walk on two legs. You don't really need those. That is to sell the idea of cyborgs, of the singularity,

of man merging with machine. That's what that's about. So there's some hidden messages underneath all of this stuff. But the few people that are out there working, they are nearly 70% of Americans, they said, are looking for extra work to combat inflation. Well, I don't think that is true, or we wouldn't be seeing the kinds of labor shortages that we are. But the people who are still in the labor force are invaluable. But a lot of them have been kicked out by the vaccine mandate. Yeah, just like that Coast Guard rescue guy. In California, the gas price is now more than double the price in Texas. And if you look at this Zero Hedge article, you see a chart there. And it kind of breaks it down by region.

And when you look at that, isn't that interesting? It kind of maps into areas that are under Democrat control for the most part. Florida stands out as being not the cheapest area, next to the cheapest region, part of that. So they have a dark blue, which is the cheapest. That goes from Texas through the south and up into some mid-Atlantic states. Florida, though, is the next rung up, and that's where some of the states north of the Mason-Dixon line are.

At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore

Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Then you have the couple more levels and then you have the uh a couple more levels and then you have the worst levels and that is out on the west coast oregon california places like that you know as i look at it seems to me like that's the map of the bible belt i don't

know is is you know uh is are the democrats everybody looks at this and say well you know it's the democrats that are doing this to us. And it's like, yeah, but you know, maybe God is using the Democrats to, uh, to punish these areas.

I don't know. Uh, California leads the nation at the price of $6 and 35 cents per gallon. Uh, more than double the price paid in Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, nearly double the price paid in eight other States.

Uh, in Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, nearly double the price paid in eight other states. Oregon is the second highest price at $5.41 per gallon. There's a big difference between California and even number two. You know, $5.41 versus $6.35. And then in California, Mono County has the dubious distinction of the highest in the country at $6.94 per gallon. Wow. So I guess we could call this the Gavin Gas Price. Gavin Gas Price. It's kind of alliteration to help you remember where this is all coming from.

Taxes at about 66 cents to the price of a gallon of gas, about twice as much as the average in other states. California's cap and trade program and low carbon fuel standard adds roughly another 46 cents a gallon. So one of the reasons why California is so far ahead of number two Oregon is because not only do they have heavy taxes like these other Western states, but they demand a special blend. You know, you got to go to Starbucks in order to fill up your car. No, I mean, it might as well. You know, there's only a few refiners that are capable of, you know,

that are interested, I should say, in meeting that California standard, and they've been having some problems in addition. So they've been having more than the usual supply chain issues, but it's not a supply chain issue. It's a government regulation issue. Expect California Governor Gavin Newsom to run for president in 2024, says Zero Hedge. And if you want to pay higher prices for everything everything he is the man to

root for now we're just talking about jobs and the fact that the democrats and technocratic elite people like elon musk people like peter teal people like michael bloomberg they're all on the same page this is why i i harp on Thiel and on Elon Musk. Conservatives think that these two guys are on their side. They're not on your side. Conservatives like to have competition. Peter Thiel says competition is for losers. He's just like John D. Rockefeller, who said competition was a sin,

because he lived in a Christian America. So he would talk about it in terms of sin. But now we don't think about any moral issues. It's all simply about winning, you know, like Trump. And so it's winning and losing. So there's no sin issues there. It's just you're a loser. I'm a winner. And so he's about that, but he's also about

deep state surveillance. Heavily allied with the CIA. A palantir that he helped to found. But both of these guys coming from PayPal, which is now being used to usher in, get people accustomed, I guess, to the coming central bank digital currency where they can shut you down financially if they don't like what you sell, if they don't like what you say, they don't like what you do. They will force you to comply with their green edicts. And so, you know, but we look at Peter Thiel, it's like,

oh, but look, he gave a lot of money to some conservative candidates. Oh, look, he spoke in 2016 at the Republican Convention when Trump was nominated. Oh, and Elon Musk wants to give us free speech by buying Twitter. How pathetic. I mean, to see the kind of hope that that engendered with people. Like, first of all, understand that social media itself is something that was designed by the deep state and the technocracy to control you, to monitor you, to be able to close the feedback loop on propaganda, to know if their propaganda is working because they can monitor what you say about their propaganda on social media and then fine-tune the propaganda. It was always designed to push narratives, to control speech, and to monitor people. And if we think that benevolent billionaire dictators are going to be our salvation, we don't really have a future.

And that's why I focus on Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. Because it's just the conservative press is just fawning over these two guys. Because they have reinvented themselves as Republicans, just like Trump reinvented himself as a Republican. None of the three of them have any conservative values. Look at their lives. Look at their foundations that they create. Look at the things that they have done. Everything that they...

Look at what they do, not at what they say. And you'll know that none of these billionaires are your friends. They're not on our side. They're playing for the other team. They're playing for Satan. So AOC says having babies is a way to conscript parents to work against their will. Well, there you go. This is an extension of the abortion debate that she's doing.

I would just say no. She is pushing. She's all about taxes. She's all about abortion. She is a candidate for death and taxes. That's what she's pushing. Parents, the second parent, we used to have intact families, and they used to not have the kind of economic pressures that they have now.

Where did those pressures come from? Well, they came from people like her telling women, oh, you want to work. That's the only way that you can be fulfilled. You won't find any fulfillment in having children or having a home. No, no, no. Your fulfillment is at work. Now she's saying that the babies are doing this? No, it's her party, her philosophies that were doing that.

And it wasn't necessary in the 1950s, as I pointed out many times. You had, we still had two-parent homes. You had the income tax rate for the median family income was about 2%. And by the 1990s, when I was talking about it, and it's even worse now, when I was talking about it running for office, I said, do you realize that taxes have forced women into the workplace for no net gain?

Because by that time, it was about 28% and the average working woman was making about 25% of the household income. Now that is, you know, assuming that you still had two parent families, it's kind of an obsolete example now. You know, 30 years, that was something that was still around. Now it's pretty much gone. And, uh, people have bought into this. What happens is you make more money. You get into a higher tax bracket. You got more expenses in terms of wardrobe and transportation and all the rest of this stuff. Uh, you can live a simpler life. Sometimes less is more if you have an intact family. But it is also the attacks on the family, the attacks on parenthood and the rest of the stuff led by people like AOC, Occasional Cortex, that have caused so much misery that is worse than economic misery, the broken families.

And welfare always did that. Burgess Owens talked about growing up in a black community where you had intact families and you had small business entrepreneurs and all the rest of the stuff. He said it all changed once welfare came in. Families started breaking up and the rest of the stuff. They removed some all changed once welfare came in. Families started breaking up and the rest of this stuff. They removed some incentives for people to stay together. There were financial incentives to stay together. Now they've got financial incentives to not stay together. But anyway, she says forcing poor and working class people to give birth against their will,

against their consent, against their ability to provide for themselves or a child, is a profound economic issue and it's certainly a way to keep a workforce basically conscripted to large-scale employers and to employers to work more against their will, to take second and third jobs against their desire and against their autonomy, says Occasional Cortex. In this particular case, their cortex is not firing. and third jobs against their desire and against their autonomy, says occasional cortex. In this particular case, her cortex is not firing. It's just her mouth on autopilot. She has nothing to sell you but death and taxes.

She hates the family. She hates children. She doesn't want to have children. Perhaps that's why she doesn't want to have children. She might be forced to work. I don't know. Government directing children to online chats to talk to anonymous adults about sex without parental consent. This is what the government has in store for you.

These are the people you want raising your kids. These are the people you want to turn your kids over to at three years old or even earlier. So they can raise your kids and indoctrinate them and inculcate their values into them. And these are the wonderful values that our government has, the Arizona Department of Education. At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet

up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Not even one of the reliably leftist states was put on notice this month that they're being sued for directing children via the state Arizona Department of Education website. They're directing kids to chat rooms in which they can discuss sex, gender, and anything else without their parents knowing.

Interestingly enough, I thought this was kind of funny. They call the website QChat. QChat. Are they trying to tweak the Q people? Always talking about government pedophiles and everything. Trying to keep that going, aren't they? Trying to stoke that. So QChat, where they send the kids,

they have groups that are run by facilitators who guide group conversations and help if anything comes up. They have staff and volunteers from youth programs at LGBTQ plus centers across the United States. Remember, you remember this guy? I think his name was Brenton. His first name was Sam. Remember the guy, the S&M guy, the nuke boy for Biden?

He's going to be in charge of the nuclear waste in this country as soon as he finishes acting out his leather and bondage fantasies with his pals. Well, he was one of the big cheerleaders for something called the Trevor Project. And the Trevor Project focuses on teens who have LGBT concerns. It's a grooming organization. It's just what it is. And so it's going to be people like that guy, like Sam Britton, who, you know, staff and volunteers to talk to teens about their LGBTQ questions. And of course you can go to the

QChat site being run by Arizona. And at the bottom of every page on the QChat site is an escape button. The escape button quickly redirects all the users to google.com. And, of course, the purpose of that is to hide from the parents what is being talked about. As soon as the parents come in, boom, you know, you do that, and it changes the screen so they don't see it. This, according to Arizona Attorney General Tom Horn, isn't that great that Arizona has got an attorney general named Tom Horn?

I remember the real Tom Horn story. If you remember that story, had Steve McQueen playing Tom Horn. He was railroaded and executed. Anyway, that's another story for another day. But I think it's funny that they would have Tom Horn as attorney general. This makes the site illegal, according to the attorney general, Tom Horn, as it violates the Arizona statute prohibiting government agencies from encouraging children to hide information from their parents. Horn says the escape button

is designed to do just that. Of course it is. So, as this commentator at Freethought Project points out. Just remove the entire LGBT label, and this scenario is just as disturbing if it were marketed to straight kids. How many times have I said that? When you look at the drag queen story time hours

and what they're doing, would anybody be cheering that if it was done as a heterosexual thing? If it wasn't about homosexual, gay, and trans stuff? No, they wouldn't be cheering it. They'd be appalled. And that's what a conservative drag queen, I played that clip for you a couple of times, said,

hey, I want to talk to all the straight moms out there and tell you what this drag scene is really about. It's about sex and drugs. And this is this is something you don't want their eight-year-old getting what they believed was inappropriate sexual education. And that was heterosexual stuff. It was just not appropriate for that age. But now no one can object to it because we must worship at the LGBT altar. So he said, if you just remove that label, and that scenario is just as disturbing if it was marketed to straight kids.

Parents would likely be just as uncomfortable with their children chatting anonymously online without their consent with straight anonymous adults having conversations about sex with their 13-year-old. It's just common sense. But again, back to Gavin. Gadfly Gavin Newsom has signed a law making California a sanctuary state for child transgender surgery. As a matter of fact, this is a law being pushed by Scott Weiner, the radical LGBT

state senator from San Francisco. And he also sponsored law, writes WND, in 2020 that reduced penalties for adults who had oral or anal sex with a willing minor child within 10 years of their age. So, you know, that would mean that, I guess, if you're 19, nine-year-olds are fair game, right? Or if you're 21, 11-year-olds are fair game, according to Scott Wieniner and according to California. And so now this is a new law that says that, um, California is going to, if,

if a minor gets to California and wants to mutilate their body, then a California government will stop the parents from stopping that mutilation. It would prohibit California police from enforcing arrest warrants for transgender treatments for minors that are illegal in their own states. The bill would also quote, prohibit the enforcement of an order based on another state's law, authorizing a child to be removed from their parent or guardian based on that parent or guardian, allowing the child to receive gender-affirming health care in California. The LA Times said, well, whether or not this law will be upheld in court

is in question because of federal requirements that states must recognize out-of-state laws when residents travel. Well, I'm not so sure about that. I mean, the LA Times just might be trying to assuage fears and objections about that. Because when I looked at that, I thought, well, okay, so states have to recognize out-of-state laws when residents travel? I reported of several different cases just in New Jersey where you had people who were licensed concealed carry holders, and they got in a lot of trouble in New Jersey because New Jersey would not recognize that in these other states. As a matter of fact,

one of the cases I remember, you had an individual who was licensed to carry. He was in the process of moving from one state to another. He wasn't even moving to New Jersey. He was traveling through New Jersey, and I think he was going to visit some relatives. And he had packed a gun in his trunk, and it was under a great deal of luggage and other clothes and stuff like that just packed down there and he was late and his family was concerned and they called the police to check on him the police see the car and they pull it over and they talk to him and then they ask him if they could search his car and And so they search and they pull everything out of the trunk.

And at the bottom, lo and behold, they find some guns. And they said, well, we don't care if you're licensed for carry in your state. We don't recognize those laws. And they arrested him. So I don't really know how that works. But I do know that there is a higher law that Gavin Newsom is bumping his face at, and this came out on, I meant to cover this on Friday, but I didn't. This is an open letter was written from Pastor John MacArthur.

He's in L.A. somewhere. That's one of the churches. He's very well known. He used to be on Larry King frequently. To the general public, he's fairly well known. And he became fairly well known when in July, by July of 2020, they'd had enough. And they said, no, we're going to meet at a church of about 7,000 people. And of course, demographics, as they do in most churches, skew elderly. Nobody died. It went on for months. And LA tried to begin fining them, and they put the money aside in

an escrow account while they challenged it legally. They won that legal fight. They eventually got that money back, plus damages, and so did a lot of other churches that were in the area for standing up to it. But he wrote an open letter to Gavin Newsom over these pro-abortion billboards that Newsom was putting out. And he says, among other things, he said to Newsom, he said, your soul lies in grave, eternal peril. In response to the billboards I talked about last week, putting these in multiple states, he's got so much money, he doesn't need it. He's got 20-something million dollars in his campaign war chest,

and his opponent only has half a million. Nobody, he doesn't. As a matter of fact, I had a listener sent me a letter and, um, I should have taken a screenshot of this so I could show it. He said, you talk about arrogance. He, and he, so they, they put out a, uh, a booklet where the candidates make statements. And so every candidate gets a chance to make a statement. They put this out as a voting guide for everybody in the state. And so you see all the different candidates, and they've got their biography and their statement

and all the rest of this stuff. For Gavin Newsom, it just says no candidate statement. He didn't even bother to put anything in there. And so Jennifer sent this to him and said, I want to tell you how much I respect you and enjoy your broadcast. I've listened to you for years, shared your opinions with other people. I just got my California election ballot. Can you believe that he put nothing on his page? Guess he doesn't have to submit anything since the fix is already in.

Yeah, just amazing. That's where he is. And he's got so much money that he's spending this to push abortions and to tell people, come to my state, we'll give you an abortion. But then he goes a bit further. And on one of the billboards, he puts up a Bible verse, says, love your neighbor as yourself. There is no greater commandment than these. So come and I guess after you love your neighbor enough, they need an abortion. So you can go to California after that. So John MacArthur took explicit aim, says Faithwire, this is faithwire.com,

took explicit aim at this action, called for the governor's use of Jesus' word, quote, an act of gross blasphemy. He then summarized the campaign as sheer wickedness. He said, in mid-September, you revealed to the entire nation how thoroughly rebellious against God you are when you sponsored billboards across America promoting the slaughter of children whom God creates in the womb.

And he gave Gavin Newsom some biblical references himself. He said, you further compounded the wickedness of that murderous campaign with a reprehensible act of gross blasphemy, quoting the very words of Jesus as if you could somehow twist his meaning and arrogate his name in favor of butchering unborn infants. And he wasn't done there. That's faith bar. Earlier in the letter, the preacher went on to cite Isaiah's warnings against calling

good evil and evil good, claiming many of Newsom's policies reflect, quote, an unholy, upside-down view of honor and morality. Well, that's basically where we are in this society now. He said the diabolical effects of Newsom's beliefs are being seen in crime and homelessness and other cultural consequences in California. He wrote that his goal in penning the letter rather than political posturing or arguing was to plead with Newsom to listen to the Lord. He said, my concern, Governor Newsom, is that your own soul lies in grave eternal peril. You will stand in the presence of the holy God who created you,

who is your judge, and he will demand that you give an account for how you have flouted his authority in your governing and how you have twisted his holy word to rationalize it. Well, there was much more that was in that, but that pretty much covers it. And if you want to look how unholy and twisted the entire state of California government is. Just take a look at this ongoing case against the Center for Medical Progress and David Daleiden and others.

This headline sums it up. The first undercover journalist to be criminally prosecuted in California's history because of what they found. And what is troubling about what they found. And you remember this, this is about, this story is about five or six years old. I think it was back in 2015 or something that this all broke. They've been fighting this for a long time. And as part of the persecution that David Daleiden and others are undergoing. We've had, because of discovery, we have now learned that the NIH and the FDA were some of the key customers

paying Planned Parenthood and their surrogates to murder babies, to cut them up while alive in order to harvest organs for their heinous experiments. You want to talk about religious exemptions? At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest

week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.e and um for all these products that they are producing but that information about the fact that this is being uh they've got bounties out the government itself the federal government the fda the nih using places like the university of pitts Pittsburgh to launder this through you know when we go through things we don't really necessarily understand why but you know David delight in these other people as they have been going through

this difficult time of persecution legally through the trial through the expense all the rest of the stuff, even as with criminal charges facing jail. God is using that to expose the FDA, to expose the NIH. So in the frown of providence, we see God's hidden smile, don't we? It's been several years already since a journalist at the Center for Medical Progress went undercover and caught abortion executives discussing their profits on the sales of body parts of unborn infants. One example that went famous was a woman saying, yeah, let's make this happen. I want a Lamborghini.

But still pending is a Lamborghini. Uh, but, uh, still pending is a criminal case. Um, you know, you've had, um, uh, judgments against them for alleged privacy violations, but now they're moving on to a criminal phase against the journalist. Uh, it was launched by, uh, Javier Becerra. I guess the criminal thing was launched by him, perhaps. But all the rest of this stuff began with Lala Harris. So Lala Harris began it. She was attorney general in California. She becomes senator.

Javier Becerra takes her place. And he continues it. Perhaps he was the one who added the criminal charges. But I'm sure that, well, I think that the criminal charges were there from the beginning anyway. Regardless of who did it, Javier Becerra is now head of HHS, which is head of the FDA, head of NIH, head of the agencies that are out there harvesting babies' organs by murdering them while they're alive. So, Javier Becerra is a, as they point out in WND, a radical pro-abortion advocate who is now head of HHS

doing all this medical research. But they have exposed, and this went back to 2014 and 15. That's what I thought about 2015. They exposed Planned Parenthood's illegal involvement in harvesting and selling aborted baby body parts to companies such as STEM Express. You see, that's the key thing about this. You know, them exposing it is what they're trying to say is illegal,

except it was the practice that was illegal. And prior to this, there had been inquiries from members of Congress asking if this was the case, believing that it was the case. That's why they did this undercover journalism, to show that it was the case, that it was, that they were violating the law. The recordings captured Planned Parenthood executives, haggling over the prices of baby body parts, because we've already established what they are. Haven't we?

We've established what these people are. They're just haggling over the price. So now discovery is showing us some more details. Under threats from California's abortion-advocating state government operations, and this is a doctor who testified even though she's threatened, and you know they're going to take action against her. They'll find something to come after her. But still, she testified. Dr. Teresa Deicher, an expert in adult stem cell research, who got her PhD in molecular and cellular physiology

from Stanford University. She said, she's a stem cell expert. She testified that hearts from live aborted babies procured from abortion providers were used for research studies. She said that she goes to great lengths as a cardiovascular researcher to make sure that the mice that she studies do not suffer needless pain. In fact, she said she would face ethical charges and go to jail if she cut beating hearts out of mice without anesthesia. But she also testified how horrified she was upon reading various studies involving baby human hearts procured from STEM Express, and I'll add, for and human services and their departments, same people that, you know, Sarah is presiding over. Anyway, the experiment, the studies involving baby human hearts procured from STEM Express,

which the evidence of the hearings showed were sourced from Planned Parenthood. She knew these studies had to be conducted while the hearts were still beating when cut out with anesthesia from the aborted babies. And I've covered this multiple times. They were very careful, as one of the things that you saw in this testimony was how careful they were in terms of, you know, well, what is it that you need? You know, do you need this particular organ? No, we can do that. You need what age? Okay, we can it that you need? Do you need this particular organ? We can do that. You need what age? Okay, we can do that. And then they would work to schedule that.

And as many people pointed out, you would harvest the organs. They even do that for organ donors. They don't have much success if the patient has died already. So it's typically somebody who is brain dead, and the family says they're on life support, but they're not going to come back, and the family gives the okay. And they get everything set up and ready to go,

and they cut the organ out while the patient's still alive. Not necessarily without anesthesia, I hope. But then they run with it, because they've only got a limited amount of time. So she said she consulted with Daleiden before he and Merritt filmed the undercover videos and told them that the research methods discussed in these studies would have required fetal hearts cut out without anesthesia from live babies. Among those in the interview was Mary Gatter, one of the people that they got with the undercover video.

Formerly a medical director of Planned Parenthood LA, she is a former business partner of Da Vinci companies that were shut down for illegally selling fetal organs and tissues from Planned Parenthood. They said Gatter admitted that undercover videos of her negotiating prices that Planned Parenthood. They said Gatter admitted that undercover videos of her negotiating prices that Planned Parenthood would charge for baby body parts took place at a cocktail reception at an outdoor hotel pool, another reception at a hotel mezzanine, and at a restaurant among other places of public accommodation. Gatter also admitted cocktail lounges, restaurants, and elevators are all public places. And this is germane because, again, they don't care about the information.

They only want to know, well, how did you get this? Where did it come from? Same thing that Hillary Clinton did when Julian Assange pointed out where her emails were. Well, who did that? Don't pay attention to that. Don't look at the emails. Who was it that did it? I think pay attention to the, don't look at the emails. Who was it that did it? I think it was Russia. I think it was Putin. Yeah. You, you do that red herring,

distracting people away from the actual thing and get everybody talking about, well, who leaked it? Who got the information? Uh, she was the one who said, I want a Lamborghini while negotiating prices for human livers, for brains, for hearts, and for lungs. In addition, Dr. Deborah Nukatola testified under oath that when a video in which she describes criminal partial birth abortion procedures in order to sell baby body parts, when that was released in 2015, she said she felt the content was no big deal. This is like Ralph Northam,

the doctor who became a governor in Virginia. He says, yeah, that's a big deal. You want a baby, if it survives the abortion, you just set it over there on the table and you let it die. That's called comfort care. That was standard procedure. He knows that. The public didn't know that.. That was standard procedure. He knows that.

The public didn't know that. The public was appalled. The jury in the Gosnell case was appalled when they found out that that was what standard procedures were. Gosnell went to jail because instead of letting the child just die on its own from exposure, from lack of food and water, he killed it. I think maybe the other is the worst way to die. Anyway, she said she felt the content was no big deal. She didn't think that she said anything inappropriate in the video. She has a conscience

seared by a hot iron. In the video of her conversation at a public restaurant in LA, she described using ultrasound guidance to flip a baby in the womb to a feet-first breach position. Now, that's not good for the mother, is it? In order to extract the baby intact and harvest whole, fresh organs. What we're talking about here is not a partial birth abortion. We're talking about partial birth vivisection. Let's get as much, you know, we need to, you know, get something, some organs from the lower part of the body. So let's flip the body around, have a breech birth.

We can extract the organs while the baby is still alive without any anesthesia. What's the big deal, she says. I don't get it. The evidence will demonstrate that California's first ever prosecution of an undercover journalist is selective, says Liberty Council Chairman Matt Staver. It is selective, it is discriminatory, and Sandra will be vindicated. The efforts to suppress the truth about abortion instigated by Lala Harris and Javier Becerra will not stand. He said Harris was a bought and paid for ally

of the abortion industry and is facing a legal complaint that accuses her of colluding with Planned Parenthood to bring felony charges in the case as a state official in California. So far, the civil trial where they lost, and I'm going to appeal that, civil trial was handled by a judge appointed by Obama because that's what we have in America now. We have political justice. Both this judge, Oreck, and his wife are longtime donors to San

Francisco's Good Samaritan Family Resource Center, where Oreck was a board member and helped to fund and open a Planned Parenthood clinic on its site. So they're not going to recuse themselves for any personal bias. They're just going to continue on with it because we have political justice. The blindfold has come off of Lady Liberty and they got their thumbs on the scale to boot. Here's an 83-year-old who was shot in the back while handing out pro-life pamphlets. Compare this to the person who was SWAT teamed because he pushed back against the guy who was verbally assaulting his son, getting in his face, and he pushed the guy back. Now, the guy had nothing to do with trying to stop an abortion.

He was trying to stop the guy from assaulting his young son. But because it happened at an abortion clinic, that's what they're making this about. They're making the, oh, well, you pushed him in order to prevent somebody from getting an abortion, trying to get a felony charge against him. They SWAT teamed him. But here you have an 83-year-old woman

who was handing out pro-life pamphlets at one of the houses, and this is in Michigan, Ionia, Michigan. She was going door to door, handing out pamphlets, 83 years old. She had a heated conversation with a woman at the home, and then she walked away. And then a man emerged from inside the house and shot the 83-year-old woman in the back. She drove herself to the police department to report it.

They took her to the hospital. She is recovering to the police department to report it. They took her to the hospital. She is recovering. That's the only good news. But, yeah, you want to talk about hate? Yeah, that kind of hate crime, no, no worry about that. We're only going to worry about the people who are trying to save babies' lives. We'll be right back. Stay with us.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10

if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm, 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie The common man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com To films. I had last week an interesting interview with Ted Bear. I hope I can get him on again because there's a lot of stuff that I wanted to ask him. We had a short interview of about 15 minutes. A lot of things that I wanted to ask him about Hollywood. But here's something that I thought was interesting. Over this weekend, we had a highly touted film, Bros,

which was pushing a homosexual romantic comedy with graphic sex scenes. And it bombed at the box office, which I see as a very positive sign. Roger Friedman, film critic. The headline, box office. Bros may score just $5 million over the weekend after a disastrous opening night. This was written on Saturday. I don't know if it continued to pull in money after word got out what it was about or not. Total receipts for Thursday and Friday came to just 1.8 million.

With another 2.5 million coming on Saturday and Sunday expected, it could stand to make less than5 million for its entire opening season. But the real story is the fact that it had very, very wide release and very, very heavy promotion. And so they sunk $25 million into the budget for making the film, but then a lot more money in promoting it. As a matter of fact, what Roger Friedman says, he said the movie has had a tremendous amount of publicity and marketing,

a blanketing that most films would give their popcorn up for. This just means that the public at large had no interest in seeing not only a homosexual rom-com, but one with graphic sex scenes. And it comes from Universal Studios, which is exactly what Ted Bear was saying. He said, yeah, they make the movies that they want to make, and then they have to make some other movies to make up for the losses of the movies that they want to make. And the movies that they'll get patted on the back by their colleagues in Hollywood for, um, they probably don't care whether or not this loses money.

Right. Um, Roger Friedman says, uh, well, universal has got another one in the pipeline, a second film in this genre, homosexual rom-com,

I guess, uh, coming out soon, it's called Spoiler Alert. He said, once that's over, this genre may be severely curtailed. Well, I don't know. Because again, that's what they want to do. They know what makes money, and they don't want to make those films. We used to have these conversations with the movie executives when we had the video rental store.

I'd talk to them about, you know, making a cleaner version for DVD. We talked to them all the time about, you realize, of course, don't you, that good quality family films are the ones that make a lot of money? You know, even R-rated films that make a lot of money. The most profitable R-rated film was Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ, because R-rated films don't do as well as G and PG films. That's even why they had the big fight for years about, are we going to do a PG 13? Um,

you know, because, uh, if they, if there was something there that was a little bit too strong for them to give a PG rating to, it popped up to an R rating and that was going to hurt them financially. And that's why they created the PG 13,

um, level for that. And, uh, so, you know, they know what it takes to make a profitable film, but they're not interested in that. Uh, they want to push their sexual and social and cultural agenda on you. And they will pay dearly for that. Just look at Disney. Disney is the best example. That's why I would like to talk to a Ted bear about that because he's got, um,

you know, he had, uh, friends and family who, uh, were very close to, uh, Walt Disney. So,

um, thank you, Richard Williams. I really do appreciate that tip on rock fan. Thank you very much. Um, so by the way, we haven't changed the,

um, um, haven't changed the, uh, gas gauge on the new site yet. I appreciate everybody's support. We got close to making the goal this month, this last month, so I really do appreciate everybody's support on that. We will be updating that.

Kirk Cameron has got a film out, and I think it's interesting to contrast these two. His film is an anti-abortion film, Life Mark. And this is coming from some movie producers, filmmakers, the Kendrick Brothers out of Georgia. They've got a good track record. They've always made profitable films. They don't cost a lot of money to do, but they have legs. They have a lot of following people who want to

go watch something at the films, uh, the movies, but, um, you know, they, they want this type of content. So it would be a moneymaker. Uh, they didn't get any money from a film studio to make it. You know, Universal gave $25 million to make Bros. So they got zero from the film companies, the studios, and they went to all the different distributors to try to get it into the movie theaters. And none of the distributors would take it either. See, that's the key. When you look at the movie theaters that are going out of business,

part of it is because they've got these deals with particular distributors and that type of thing. You would think that with all the empty seats in the movie theaters, they'd be looking for something that was going to make them money. Like a film from the Kendrick Brothers. But they're not. They're not looking for money. The people who wound up distributing it was a group that typically does event films. And so they'll put something in the box office. They do that a lot with some low-budget films and a Christian film.

Sometimes they'll do it with some sort of a concert or something like that that'll appear for just a couple of nights. And that's the only kind of distribution. They were able to get for this film. Because it's a. Anti-abortion film. As well as a Christian film. Nobody wanted to touch it.

So they put it in theaters. And their first weekend. They earned. 2.2 million. And it was in a tiny fraction of the theaters that it typically would. Bros has got wide release with everybody. It's universal studios that did it, and they got it put out everywhere and had massive promotion and advertising for it. These people got no advertising except word of mouth.

They had limited distribution. They were only going to do it for one week, but they made so much money the first weekend, they said, all right, we'll do two weeks of it. And it continues to grow from word of mouth. See, this is not, you know, the debate has always been, well, my entire life we would hear, are the movies pushing an agenda? And all the time, now it is obvious, it's pretty obvious that they're pushing this beyond what the people want. But for the longest time, they would defend what they were doing by saying, we're not creating the culture. We're just reflecting the culture.

We're showing where people really are. If we weren't showing what people really want, then they wouldn't be showing up to watch our films. Well, take a look at Bros vs. Life Mark. And they're going to continue to make films like Bros, and they're going to continue to promote them, and they're going to continue to promote them and they're going to continue to do that even if they lose money they don't care and they're not going to put out the films that do make money that people want to see at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much

as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie So when they met with all uh with all the different hollywood movie studios distribute the latest film life mark um they got uh a response that they had not heard before definitely no you know that some of these movie studios had distributed some of their films in the past, but they said no.

And so they said they were told that it was because it expresses a clear pro-life viewpoint. They're not going to put it out. And so Movie Guide puts it this way. Faith-based drama about an 18-year-old teenager, David, who tried to hide the fact that he was adopted until his biological parents tried to contact him. One day, David comes home and his parents, who raised him, tell him his biological mother wants to meet him. Deciding to meet his birth mother, David hears from his biological father

and must decide if he would like to meet him as well. Will David be able to open, be open with them and listen to what they have to say without, about giving him up for adoption. This was actually based on a true story. And the guy who was given up for adoption, raised by adoptive parents. And when this all happened to him, after it happened to him,

he did a short little documentary about the experience. And Kirk Cameron saw that documentary and then wanted to do it and did do it as a dramatization. Anyway, Ted Bear's movie guide says it's well-made, heartwarming, inspiring movie. Kirk Cameron is also starring in it. The movie promotes relying on God, believing in God's plan, forgiveness, and loving others. There's also a beautiful pro-life message about adoption, giving birth, and the value of life. He said, don't let the PG-13 rating stop you from seeing this movie. The movie's themes about abortion and pro-life issues are the reason the Hollywood

elites are giving Life Mark such a tough rating. They figured that a lot of people who would be in this audience, if they see PG-13, they would object to it and not go to it. But it's simply what is talked about. They want to say that talking about that is not going to be allowed. That's hateful. It's something that you shouldn't expose kids to talk about being pro-life. You just want to expose them to changing their gender, right? And so he breaks it down as they do in all the reviews.

Foul language? No. Violence? None. Neutrity? None. Alcohol use? None.

Smoking and or drug use and abuse? None. Miscellaneous immorality? Nothing objectionable. So it gets a PG-13. Because Hollywood objects to it. So, all this is happening. As you look at what the major studios are doing, as you look at what Netflix is doing

with Blonde, and I talked about that last week, just how awful the film was. Brutal rapes and the rest of the stuff, focusing on abortions that she was alleged to have had and then imagining that she's haunted by the children that she had. And a lot of feminists said, well, you are, uh, uh, it's too pro-life. We don't like that.

You know, she shouldn't be haunted by these kids, by her decision. It's a great thing. And they said, well, no, we're just showing how she was completely dominated by the patriarchy. It's how the Netflix people said that. And so it's absolutely unwatchable. People are turning it off. I say after 20 minutes in the reviews, uh, it's absolutely unwatchable. People are turning it off, I say, after 20 minutes in the reviews. It's also from Movie Guide. Hey, Netflix, how many times do we need to tell you

that movies and TV shows with more uplifting, inspirational content outperform those with excessive sex and violence? Even diehard fans of Marilyn Monroe say they're disgusted with a, quote, unwatchable travesty that is blonde. They've labeled the Netflix first NC-17 movie as exploitative and degrading. Well, look at their history. I mean, these are people who did cuties and other stuff, or distributed it. It was actually a French thing. Uh, but you know, that was, um, showing, um, young kids a few years ago, doing the kinds of stuff that everybody celebrates now with these, uh,

drag queen storytime hours, you know, they had, uh, young girls that were, uh, you know, operating in a situation where they're doing suggestive, essentially child trafficking and that type of stuff. You actually had one local district attorney charged Netflix with crimes. I forget whether it was child pornography or what it was. But that's what Netflix is about. And so the Independent compiled some of the reactions on Twitter to Blonde. One person said,

While the film is beautifully shot most of the time, and Anna de Armas gives a luminous performance that falls apart fast, and the last hour is unwatchable. An absolute head-scratcher of a movie, said one person. Another one said, I tried to watch it, but I couldn't stomach more than 20 minutes to the nearly three-hour length. That's 20 minutes was nothing but cruel, heartbreaking, absolutely unwatchable.

Another person said, I just started to watch Blonde and turned it off after 20 minutes. Someone else described it as a hate letter to the icon that was Marilyn. Anna D. Armas, who portrays Monroe, also confessed that she was not comfortable with what the director asked of her. She said, quote, I did things in this movie I would have never done for anyone else, ever.

I did it for her, and I did it for Andrew. Well, you can tell yourself that. You did it for Andrew, you did it for Andrew. Well, you can tell yourself that. You did it for Andrew, you did it for fame. Audiences may finally be fed up with the gratuitous content and instead seek to watch entertainment that brings them some hope. Even Netflix's Top 10 reveals the truth that while new titles like Blonde, and they did another one on Jeffrey Dahmer, because, you know, murder, cannibalism, all that stuff is just so cool right now.

I guess that's why we like Zelensky so much. May make the list for a few days, these types of films, or for a couple of weeks, but it's positive content like Cocoa Melon, Despicable Me, Sing To and Sing To, family-friendly options. Those are the ones that are the mainstays even on Netflix's top 10 list. Because, again, if you make something, even if it is, you know, they're not satisfied even to produce family movies that are going to push the climate

MacGuffin because that's been a thing that they've done for a long time. No, they've got to go satanic on us. Got to have blonde, got to have Dahmer. Netflix limits the data that they release and they manipulate the statistics to make movies like Blonde look more popular than they are. We're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk about what's going on in Ukraine and the move towards World War III. We'll be right back. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival,

we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Terima kasih telah menonton! You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, of course, last week I think things escalated quite a bit in a number of different ways. You had Putin announce that they've annexed the four different regions. And to say that as Russian territory, they will consider any attack on them to be an attack on Russia. You had the Nord Stream pipelines exploded, sabotage, blown up. You had Zelensky's move and many other things happening, as well as a speech by Putin. But I think it's important for us to look at it and to understand, if we're going to

understand how they see this, again, as an existential threat. I think it's why I've talked about Alexander Dugin and how Russians have viewed what's going on in Ukraine, what is happening with NATO. They see this as them being backed into a corner. They see it as an existential threat. And, of course, the Biden administration is pushing ahead and not relaxing any of that. So Putin declared four annexed regions ours forever, and then blamed the U.S.

for the Nord Stream attacks, essentially. He declared a mission accomplished of sorts. He said these eastern and southern provinces are now part of Russia forever. We will protect our land using all our forces and we will protect their security. He bluntly informed the large audience that they had set up at St. George's Hall in the Grand Kremlin Palace of Moscow. He said there's now four new regions of Russia. He said the Ukrainian government and its Western hackers are rejecting this. Also on fresh reports that pro-Kremlin forces have suffered more setbacks in Donetsk in particular.

All of this really increases the risk. So we call on the Kiev regime to immediately stop hostilities and to sit at the negotiating table. And yet, on Friday, you had this pathetic little display done by Zelensky and a couple of goons. And they're on this table. They're standing out on the sidewalk, stiffly giving his little speech about how they're signing the application to join NATO. And then his pals there do the same thing.

This is all just propaganda and provocation. And this is the thing that should really concern all of us if we want to have peace and not a world war. Putin blamed the United States for this week's unexplained explosions in Nord Stream pipelines that have lifted the damaged pipelines, leaking huge amounts of natural gas. He says it's obvious to everyone who did it. And on the issue of dwindling energy supplies and soaring costs headed into what is sure to be a rough, frigid winter for European populations,

he slammed Western elites for what they've done to their own people. He said, they print money, but you can't warm your homes with this printed money. Well, I mean, you could, except they keep the money that they print, right? They print the money, they keep it within their own circle of friends. And then when it gets too inflationary, according to modern monetary theory, they tax money from you. They take money out of circulation by taking it from you,

but they put money into circulation by putting it in through their friends. They inject it through wall street. One of the issues that I had with Trump, you know, throughout the four years, Oh, look at how wall street is doing. Isn't this great. It's like, well, wall street is not main street. And we had that underscored when he did his lockdown, didn't we? The Western elites, he said, it's a crisis due to their own fault. He said the goal of the hybrid war in Ukraine is a goal to break Russia at any cost. This is how they see it. He said the dictatorship of the

Western elite is directed against all societies, including the peoples of the Western countries themselves. It is a challenge for all. This means that the total negation of the human, it means the overthrow of religion and traditional values, it means a crushing of freedoms. You know, when they talk about us, they do tell the truth, don't they? They may lie about themselves, but they tell the truth about us. This is a quote from his speech on Friday. He said, do they really want to have a parent number one, number two, number three?

Do we really want, I should say, as he's talking to the Russian people, do we want to have parent number one, number two, number three, instead of mom and dad in Russia? Do we want children to be told that there are other genders besides men and women? Is this the future that we want for our children? For us, this is unacceptable, said the Russian president. He also slammed Washington's past use of nuclear weapons, commenting that the U.S. is the only country in the world to have used nuclear weapons, creating a precedent, he said.

Well, I just have to say from the standpoint that, you know, I agree with the founders of this country, that liberty is a blessing from God. And I have to say that in spite of all of the many, many faults of Putin and Russia, this is a very authoritarian country, but not necessarily any more authoritarian than our country. But they have not set themselves up in direct opposition to God and to God's order, which our countries have.

And that should give us pause. That should concern us more than anything. It's not how many horses and chariots you got. It's not how many intercontinental ballistic missiles you've got that your security resides in. It's the people who do not set themselves up in direct opposition to God that are going to have the upper hand. And, you know, God will use, as he has in times past, he will use ungodly nations to judge other nations. So I don't really see where we can make a case of the moral superiority of our society and of our leadership.

And that should be very concerning. Anyway, he said later on in an interview, saving peoples in the territories where this referendum is taking place is what we're doing, is the focus of the attention of our entire society and our entire country. And again, if he would have only gone to them, he would have had a much better case. But because of the way that they conducted the war, I think they've lost a great deal of moral standing with that, making themselves, instead of defenders, aggressors in that. The pro-Russian leader of occupied areas in the Donetsk province acknowledged that his forces had just

lost full control of a couple of villages there, leaving Moscow's main garrison in northern Donetsk half encircled in the city of Lyman. And this is the issue. All of these regions that they have now annexed, they don't control. And there's still fighting going on, and it's fluid. It's going back and forth. And so with the fighting continuing there, and with Putin throwing down the legal gauntlet and saying, yeah, if you attack these areas now, that's the same as an attack on Russia, that is something that is very concerning.

So Putin signing off on absorbing the territories will be the first step towards formal annexation. Russian Constitutional Court will need to verify the decrees, comply with law. So they got some formalities there, as antiwar.com is pointing out. It needs to be ratified by Russia's Houses of Parliament, the State Duma, the Federation Council. Of course, it's just going to be ratified by Russia's houses of parliament, the state Duma the Federation Council, of course it's just going to be rubber

stamping, there's not any kind of dissent that is allowed there Ukraine insists, however that it can strike Russia despite the US ban and that is especially true of these areas

because they don't even acknowledge that these areas are Russian territory. So that's really where the dispute is going to escalate rapidly. Last month, Ukrainian defense minister said that Kiev had agreements with the U.S. that, quote, we will not use weapons provided to us by the U.S. and partners on the territory of Russia. And so now Russia declares this territory. And they say, well, that is not Russian territory. That is our territory. So when you look at this corrupt regime, Ukraine has taken in at least $100 million

in crypto donations this year. What have the officials in Kiev done with the money? They don't know. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Nobody knows where it went.

And that's such a small part. It's kind of interesting that RT would focus on that. When you look at, for the last eight years, you had aid agencies, people who were on the side of Ukraine saying, you know, we've been bringing in weapons and money for the last eight years from the West to Ukraine to attack these areas. And we don't know where that went. And we can only account for a small percentage of that. And this is not tens of billions of dollars like we've given them over the last six or seven months. This is just $100 million.

Put that in perspective, Alex Jones got $9 million in crypto that he talked about at the trial, that disastrous testimony that he gave. It had been reported it was eight, and the guy said, you got $9 million in crypto that he talked about at the trial. That disastrous testimony that he gave. You know, it had been reported it was eight. And the guy said, you got $8 million in crypto? No, it was actually nine. So anyway, so he got about 10% of what Ukraine got in terms of crypto. But they said cryptocurrencies are the ideal tool in this respect.

With a few clicks, you can transfer millions of dollars to almost anybody. Nobody knows where it's coming from. And this is why RT, as well as all the Western press, is pushing, well, that's why we've got to have CBDC. Then we'll know everything that goes everywhere from everybody. We can't have these anonymous donations being made. Just a week after fundraising began, March 3rd, Deputy Minister announced that Kiev had raised $53 million.

A week later, this figure doubled. The country had received around some of $100 billion from all over the world. It seemed that a local crypto paradise had formed in Ukraine, and once the money was put into circulation, the country would be able to successfully resist Russia. However, the reality turned out to be much more complex. First, the flow of cryptocurrencies drastically weakened. In early June, the same official reported that for more than three months, the total amount of donations exceeded $100 million. In other words, it just flattened out, according to them.

Or maybe it didn't. Maybe the rest of it went to some Ukrainian officials. Ukrainian officials do not provide any detailed and reliable reports on spending in the case of millions collected globally in cryptocurrency. That's certainly no exception. In total, since the collection began in February, the Ministry of Digital Transformation has reported twice on spending a total of about $100 million. That's kind of suspicious.

That's supposed to be the total amount, but they've spent the total amount twice now. If you look at what Putin was saying, though, what he said in the speech, I think is important to look at, because this is how he is building consensus in Russia, and it also gives us an idea of how he especially, but Russia in general, sees this as an existential threat. So this is from Konstantin Kissen. He says he's been a professional translator for over 10 years. And he said, I wish every single person in the West would listen to Putin's speech. He states, as he's done from the outset, what his intentions and complaints are in the plainest terms possible. And so he said, I'm going to summarize it as a professional translator. So he spends most of the speech discussing the West. His primary complaint is not NATO's expansion,

which he only gives a cursory mention of. The West is greedy, and it seeks to enslave and colonize other nations like Russia. That's the main thrust of his attack is about that and about the moral issues. The West uses the power of finance and technology to enforce its will on other nations to collect what he calls the hegemon's tax. To this end, the West destabilizes countries, creates terrorist enclaves, and most of all seeks to deprive other countries of sovereignty. It is this avarice and desire to preserve its power that is a reason for the hybrid war, that Putin says. The collective West is waging on Russia.

They want us to be a colony. They do not want us to be free. They want Russians to be a mob of soulless slaves. That's a direct quote. The rules-based order that the West goes on about, he says, is nonsense. Who made these rules? Who agreed to them? Russia is an ancient country and a civilization, and we will not play by these rigged rules. The West has no moral authority to challenge the referendums because it has violated the borders of other

countries. Western elites are totalitarian, despotic, and apartheidistic. That's a direct quote, he said. They are racist against Russia and other countries and nations. He said Russophobia is racism. Well, you know, we see the same kind of common threads, don't we, when we look at the way that our government interacts with us domestically. We see that whereas internationally they say, well, we have rules-based order. Oh, really? Where did we get that? Well, we made that up. You know, we set the rules.

What do you see happening here? Well, we have rules. You will not do this, not do that unless you get vaccinated. You're going to have to have a passport. You're going to have to have this and that. Wait a minute. Don't we have a – no You're going to have to have this and that. Wait a minute. Don't we have a constitution? No, no, you don't have a constitution at all.

You just do what we say. And we're making this up as we go along. And we have to because it's an emergency, right? These people don't really, you know, they interact with us domestically, the same way they act internationally. He said they are Russophobic. They hate us because we don't allow our country to be pillaged by creating a strong centralized state base. And then he mentioned several different religions they have in Russia.

Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism. But he says, he then talks about bioweapon research, included in Ukraine. He says, the U.S. rules the world by the power of the fist. Any country that seeks to challenge Western hegemony becomes an enemy. Their neocolonialism is cloaked in lies like containment. Containment of Russia, containment of China, containment of Iran. The concept of truth has been destroyed with fakes and extreme propaganda. He said, you cannot feed your people with printed dollars and social media. You need food and energy. But Western elites have no desire to find a solution to the food and energy crises that they, that's his emphasis, created. They solved the problems at

the start of the 20th century with World War I, and the U.S. established dominance of the world via the dollar as a result of World War II. In the 80s, they had another crisis they solved by plundering our country. Now they want to solve their problems by breaking Russia. This is the speech that Putin gave on Friday to the Russian people. He says they're crazy. He says, I want to speak to all Russian citizens. Do we want to replace mom and dad with parent one and two and three? They invented genders and the claim that you can

transition. Do you want this for our children? We have a different vision. They have abandoned religion and they have embraced Satanism. That's actually true. That's actually true. As many people have said, you know, when Satan talks about God, he lies, but when he talks about you, he tells the truth. And so, anyway, the world is going through a revolutionary transformation. A multipolar world offers nations freedom to develop as they wish and to make up the majority of the world. And this is the way he is positioning himself in Russia.

As the people who are fighting this unipolar global dictatorship, as somebody who is opposing the globalists, but it is a professional wrestling contest. You don't want to be ruled by Russia, by Putin, by China, any more than you want to be ruled by a global dictatorship. Uh, neither one of these, they all understand that the world is going through a revolutionary transformation.

They all do understand that we're in the middle of a fourth turning and they're all seeking to get in charge of it. That's the game of Thrones that's going there. Uh, but, um, you know, what he says about America is painfully obvious to anybody who is looking at what is happening with the West, whether you're looking at it from the inside or from the outside. We're going to take a quick break, but before we do, I want to play for you what McGregor said. I forget. I think he's a retired general. They've got his rank here at the beginning of this clip. This is how he sees the current situation

and pushing us towards world war. Let's help answer that question. Let's ask Colonel Doug McGregor, a retired U.S. Army colonel, and he joins us now. Colonel, great to see you this evening. Just a whirlwind, whiplash of news today when it comes to Russia and Ukraine. What should we make of it? Well, not quite what Senator Graham had to say, or for that matter, President Biden. The destruction of the pipeline was clearly not executed by Russia. No one believes that. In fact, the German population is being polled and overwhelmingly is opposed to the notion of any war with Russia and dismisses out of hand the notion that the Russians are responsible for the pipeline. I think three things are what we're

dealing with right now. First of all, Putin has decided that no one in Washington will negotiate with him, and he knows that Washington is ultimately in control. And so he's decided that in response, he's got to escalate the military operation. People aren't aware of it in the West, but the Russian forces in Ukraine have always been outnumbered from the day they entered Ukraine. That's going to change rather dramatically, and I suspect the bombers that you referred to, who carry both conventional or nuclear weapons will have conventional arms and those bombers are probably going to be used in the escalation that we're about to witness in Ukraine. And I think he's going to settle this dispute in Ukraine on terms

that are acceptable to Russia that we may not like. But other than Poland, no one in NATO is interested in going to war with Russia. If we persist on this line, we will see NATO dissolve and fragment. Because they will assume you're saying they will not follow Poland's lead, not stand together. I assume that's what you're saying, Colonel? Of course, absolutely. No one wants to go to war with Russia other than the Poles and a few people in Washington, D.C. Well, that will be the key. That will be the key whether or not if the world will not follow. All right. So let's talk about that. You know, you saw the beginning of this.

I played for you the clip where Zelensky and his goons signed their application to NATO. They had nine countries that belonged to NATO say we support that. But it has to be unanimous. It's got to be all 30 nations. And it's just Poland and some other very, very small former Soviet satellite states like Latvia who signed on to that. But before we get to that, I just want to talk about the fact that Reuters says that the Nord Stream rupture may mark the biggest single methane release ever recorded. And they're reporting what the UN said.

Now, is that bad news? Maybe that's a good thing, right? Maybe we should be bracing ourselves for a warmer winter, because you know, methane is far more potent, according to Reuters and the UN. This is what they say. A huge plume of highly concentrated methane, a greenhouse gas that is far more potent but shorter-lived than carbon dioxide.

Oh, well, if that's the case, then the good news is that with this massive record amount of methane being released, then this potent greenhouse warming gas should warm stuff up significantly. Only for this winter. But is it likely the biggest single release of climate-damaging methane ever recorded, the UN Environment Program said on Friday? This is really bad. The largest emission event ever detected.

This is not helpful in a moment when we absolutely need to reduce emissions. This is equivalent to burning about 630,000 pounds of coal every hour. I wonder how it compares with some of the rockets that they shoot up all the time. The reality is that I would say that if we have a cold winter, I think we could write off this whole methane thing, don't you? I mean, you have a volcano and it shoots a lot of ash up into the stratosphere, blocks out the sun, because that's what really drives our climate is solar energy, not man-made. But, you know, when you have something like that, you see the effect immediately.

Well, why wouldn't we see the effect immediately with methane? This rate is very high, especially considering that it's four days following the initial breach. There was a leak once before that was very large in the Gulf of Mexico. It was viewable from space as well. It ultimately released about 40,000 metric tons of methane over 17 days. That was the equivalent of burning 1.1 billion pounds of coal. I wish that instead of burning coal, they would tell us how many rockets that represents. When you look at all the rockets that Elon Musk is putting up there, so he can blanket the Earth with 4G satellites. This is the most wasteful way to generate emissions.

Said one person. Yeah, we're not generating any energy, but it is maybe the fastest way to heat up the planet when we really need it. Uh, and the other thing that's amazing about the Biden administration, in case you didn't think that their goal was to push us into world war III. Just look at what Anthony Blinken said. He had a press conference with a Canadian counterpart, and he continued to use the term opportunity, opportunity, opportunity. He says it's a tremendous opportunity.

So, you know, you look at Cui Bono. Who benefits from this? Well, he says we benefit. I'm the one who's going who benefits from this? Well, he says we benefit. I'm the one who's going to benefit from this more than anybody. Just when speculation and an avalanche of theories have inundated the web on an array of international outlets, the Biden administration has bluntly and apparently lacking self-awareness, boasted that the pipeline bombings present an opportunity.

Well, I would disagree with Zero Hedge about that. I would say, no, it's not lacking self-awareness. Everything that they have done from the beginning has been to escalate. This is what amazes me is that people can look at this and just dismiss this as saying, well, just Biden and NATO are well-meaning, but they just continue to make these missteps. It's just absolutely amazing. You know, how could they be this foolish? They're not.

It's deliberate. It's just like what happens in the schools is deliberate. He's all but admitting that he did it. So Blinken, Secretary of State Blinken, said on Friday in a joint press briefing with Canada's top diplomat that the damage and the disruption to the pipelines are being seen in Washington as a tremendous opportunity, quote-unquote, that's his phrase, to greatly reduce European energy imports on Russia. I guess you could say what Biden did about the sanctions and about shutting down our pipeline. Right.

This is another thing. Nobody's mentioned the fact that these people love to destroy energy everywhere. You know, it was Biden who shut down our pipeline day one. And then told people you can't pull stuff out. That's going to be part of a painful transition, he says. But hey, it's worth it. We may need to have war as part of this transition as well. That'll be painful, but hey, it'll be worth it because it'll get us to their

great reset. So just think of it as a transition. Just think of it the same way you'd think of cutting off your genitals. It'd be painful, but it's well worth it, right? Because it gets us transitioned to something different. That's what this is. That's what this is. It is a trans-surgery on civilization. Ultimately, said Blinken, this is also a tremendous opportunity, tremendous opportunity to once and for all remove dependence on Russian energy and to remove energy in general, and thus to take away from Putin the weaponization of energy as a means of advancing his imperial designs. Do you think that Biden weaponizes energy? Weaponizing it from, as I said, day one with the pipeline.

At the same time, Blinken touted that the U.S. has now become, quote, the leading supplier of liquid natural gas, LNG, to Europe. Well, there you go. I mean, this is what Russia was saying, said America did it because now they're going to be making so much money selling LNG. And then he comes out and says, this is a great opportunity. Now we've got a monopoly on this stuff. I don't know how this happened. Isn't it fortunate that Russia did that so that we would have a monopoly? Isn't it great that Russia blew up their own infrastructure so that we could have

a monopoly of selling energy to Western Europe and make them dependent on us instead of on Russia. So the Biden administration said this is helping to enable European leaders to speed up the transition to renewables as well, where they'll have no energy. Blinken had repeated the word opportunity while highlighting the European energy crisis no less than three times. Canada's Jolie, for her part, pointed the finger at Russia for sabotaging its own pipeline. She said the same day she told the Atlantic Council Conference, this is a NATO organization,

that the world is, quote, not naive about who is responsible for the acts of sabotage. That's right. We see better than you think. At this point, we are still investigating, but we are not naive. You're not naive as to who's behind it. Scioto responded, as I said, we won't speculate. But at the same time, this reporter said, you're not naive about who's buying? She says, as I said, we won't speculate, but at the same time,

we want to make sure that the world needs to understand this is a very important European infrastructure that was sabotaged. The American conservative says this, one could certainly see why sabotaging Nord Stream benefits the U.S. We didn't want Europe to get Nord Stream in the first place because it would make Europe dependent on Russian gas. This is perfectly reasonable from an American point of view. However, if Washington sabotaged those pipelines

in the middle of the Ukraine-Russia war, that would mean an insane escalation of the war in terms of sabotaging critical infrastructure. It makes it harder to make peace and to restore energy flows to Europe. But this all fits Washington's policy goals. That doesn't mean that Washington is responsible for the sabotage, but there is a lot more reason for Washington have blown up the pipelines than for Russia. And they're crowing about it.

Blinken said, this is very significant, and it offers tremendous strategic opportunity for years to come. But of course, you know, even though Russia has no motive for doing that, and we have all the opportunity and the upside of that, we didn't do it. No, not at all. It just happened that way. Just a coincidence.

So Western media nevertheless is still adamantly insisting that Russia blew this up after spending 23 billion euros to build the infrastructure. Putin said on Friday, those who benefit are responsible. Of course. He said that, furthermore, other people pointed out that there is nearly a billion euros worth of gas that is still in the pipeline, that is bubbling out, that they were just talking about, the biggest release ever. Why Moscow would deliberately destroy a gas pipeline to which it invested 23 billion euros to construct over several years, which was a valuable source of income. And to lose the natural gas that's still in there is about a billion dollars worth of

natural gas. There has also been no probe of the numerous actors with far more obvious motives, far more to gain by doing so. Uh, as I said before, I think what it is is, um,

obviously it's the U S it's a false flag using the Ukrainian flag so that the U S and NATO are not seen to be the, uh, attackers of Russian stuff. They want to use that as plausible deniability, but I think everybody understands that. As a matter of fact, this article from RT talks about all of the high-tech crewless vehicles.

So you look at motive, you look at opportunity and ability when you look at these types of things. And so there's also been zero acknowledgement that an attack on Nord Stream has long been a major concern for the Gazprom executives. Moscow's proposal to equip Nord Stream 2 with security measures such as early warning systems were framed as the Kremlin insidiously seeking to extend its military and intelligence infrastructure across Europe. So I say when we're concerned about security, we want to put cameras there. Oh no, you're trying to militarize this thing. In November of 2015, a few kilometers off the Baltic island of Uland, near where the pipeline runs, an armed remote-controlled mine disposal vehicle

was found during an annual routine check of the structure. It was then removed by the Swedish Armed Forces, but it's never been revealed who put the remote-controlled mine disposal vehicle there. And it's never been revealed how the explosive-packed vehicle ended up adjacent to Nord Stream, or when, why, who, or what was operating it.

They said the U.S. has for decades aggressively opposed both covertly and overtly the Western European projects. And so they said this exercise was coincidentally conducted very, very close. The ball tops I talked about last week, you know, ball take operations. It's an annual exercise that they do talking about, you know, underwater drone innovation, underwater mining detection, same type of device that they found and then removed back in 2015. So that's exactly what they were doing right at the location. Isn't that interesting? I mean, we look at things like the July 7th bombings in the UK and the subway there, the tube bombings,

or we look at 9-11. You see an interesting thing that they've set up these training exercises at the same time, something happens and they have training exercises they did on 9-11 that were exactly the same scenario as to what happens. As a matter of fact, you had a lot of people when they're talking to them, talking about United flight 93. They said, is this part of the training exercise? They create this confusion and ambiguity at the same time they give themselves an out if they're caught. Oh, we were just doing a training exercise. And so at the same time this is happening, they were doing their Baltic operations right there

in the same area where the explosions occurred. They said soldiers learned how to operate the devices which can operate at a depth up to 100 meters, almost precisely the depth of the Nord where the explosions occurred. They said soldiers learned how to operate the devices, which can operate at a depth up to 100 meters, almost precisely the depth of the Nord Stream pipelines, and then can detect, locate, identify mines using sensors so the Ukrainian Navy can remotely destroy them with weapon systems attached to the drones. Despite such obvious grounds,

so I guess, you know, if you got all your remote control demolition equipment underwater demolition equipment and you hand it to the ukrainians and they push the button see we didn't do it they did it despite such obvious grounds for skepticism about russia's culpability and the sabotage speculation speculation that Washington may in fact have been responsible is now dismissed as a conspiracy theory. What's verifiably not a conspiracy theory is that the CIA has a history of targeting pipelines and gives no consideration whatsoever to the destructive consequences of such actions. Here's another historical reference that you haven't heard in the Western press.

In the 1980s, the early 1980s, the CIA hatched, says RT, a devilish plan whereby Soviet agents were allowed to acquire control software from a Canadian company that was embedded with a Trojan horse virus. They kind of used the software as a double agent. So, you know, this was something that would be prohibited from them, but, you know, they allow this to happen. And, you know, so Russia thinks they're getting some software that they're not allowed to have.

Except what they don't know is that the CIA has infected the software with a Trojan horse virus. This was used to run pumps, turbines, and valves on the Trans-Siberian gas pipeline. In June of 1982, the CIA used the Trojan horse to disrupt a routine pressure test by changing pump speeds and valve settings to double the usual amount of pressure released at a level far in excess of what pipe joints and wells could withstand. It was kind of similar to what they did with a Stutznet and other things like that where they would inject a virus into the Iranian nuclear centrifuge areas,

where they were working on developing nuclear stuff in Iran to basically shut it down or cause destruction. But when they did this with the Trans-Siberian Pipeline, it produced an explosion with the power of a three kiloton nuclear weapon. It significantly disrupted gas supplies to and from the Soviet Union, damaging Moscow's overseas earnings, and it caused disruption to its domestic economy. It also had a significant psychological impact as it left Soviet officials worried and uncertain about what other equipment, whether domestically produced or foreign-bought, could similarly be catastrophically flawed. Now, that was 1982. They've got a lot better capabilities now, don't they? It should be considered rather suspect then that back in June, the CIA apparently issued vague but strategic warnings to numerous European countries,

including Germany, that both of the Nord Stream pipelines could be subject to attacks in the future. Why this information was not published at the time, nor prompted Berlin to undertake security measures to prevent such an event is anybody's guess. See, that's another issue. If the German government was tipped off, which we now know, nobody publicized it at the time, Der Spiegel pointed it out and said, yeah, we were notified back in June, but when they were notified, they didn't do anything from a security standpoint.

Neither did Denmark. Biden in early February, of course, had said there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it. When asked how you're going to do that since they control it, he goes, well, you know, I promise you that we're going to be able to do that. No doubt about it. So again, when they brag about it,

when they brag about the strategic opportunity and how this is, you know, doing everything that they want. When you see their past history of doing exactly the same type of thing, their MO. Why is it a conspiracy theory? Moscow is saying that they think they can possibly restore these pipelines. I don't know. I don't know if they can or not. I mean, certainly if these things are leaking that amount of methane out,

that means that the pipe is still filled with a lot of methane at a positive pressure, obviously. I would guess it would keep the salt water out as long as the methane is flowing out with a lot of force and bubbling up, as you see that. But that's going to come to an end, and when it does, it's going to fill it up with salt water and um that was how it was first discovered when you saw some some people who were monitoring it saw the pressure drop significantly down to

the level of just what you would expect to see from the depth of the water there in the ocean. So, you know, I don't think that there is, I would seriously doubt that it's going to be fixed because it's political more than it is technological even. So that brings us to the escalation again, the fact that Putin has annexed these regions, declaring them theirs forever, saying, therefore, any attack that happens is an attack on Russia itself, and yet those areas are still active war zones.

And so that brings us right up to the point at which we have to question what is really going to happen. And, you know, it's anybody's guess, but it's not looking good. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us. Has your news been censored, banned, censored, banned over and over again? Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media? It's the duty of every thinking person to make the great escape to thedavidknightshow.com.

There you'll find links to live streams, videos, audio podcasts, and support links. Live stream the show at DLive and TREAT every Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. Eastern. Videos at Bitchute and Ugetube. New audio podcast, The Real David Knight Show, at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart Spotify and more but even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel without your support the show will run out of gas

the links to support the show are at thedavidknightshow.com to donate via Subscribestar donate via or donate via Cash App Bitcoin or P.O. Box

our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this far or donate via cash app, Bitcoin, or P.O. Box. Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this far. Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family. All right, and before we get into the cyber cockroaches, which is coming up, let's talk about a 99-year-old cockroach. This is Henry Kissinger. And even Henry Kissinger is saying it's not wise to include Ukraine and NATO. Zelensky's saying, well, we are already de facto NATO.

And he's absolutely right about that. Everybody knows that, and that has been the goal from the very beginning. Three years ago, Arestovich, who was supposedly the guy at the peace tables, you know, they'd been at war already for five years with Donetsk and region, the Donbass, and a reporter said, you know, what's the prospect for peace since you're the one negotiating this? He says, zero. He says, it's only going to get worse. He says, in 2022, it's going to break into a full war with Russia. And she goes, that's horrible. What can be done about it?

And he goes, yeah, Ukraine is going to be devastated because that's the cool thing is we're going to get into NATO. Well, they just signed their application, just had nine of the 30 countries say, yeah, we want you in. He says, well, we're already de facto. But Kissinger, even Kissinger, says it's not wise to include Ukraine in NATO. He was lambasted by the blue check marks in May, says Zero Hedge, when he dared to suggest that Ukraine should cede territory to Russia with a goal of peace.

You see, Henry Kissinger may be Machiavellian, but he's not crazy. He's not suicidal. He's just Machiavellian. He wants to, you know, his is kind of the old style evil, you know. I don't want to destroy the world. I want to rule the world. These guys today, they want to destroy the world. They don't care. It truly is demonic to the nth degree.

He says, I thought Poland, as the traditional Western countries that have been part of the Western history, were logical members of NATO, he said. But in his view, Ukraine is just a collection of territories that once were appended to Russia. He said Russians see them as their own, even though some Ukrainians do not. But he says stability would be better served by having Ukraine acting as a buffer between Russia and the U.S. But see, stability is not what they want. This is kind of like the automobile manufacturers,

and they say, well, we want you to completely change the way that you make cars. Oh, why? Because of emissions. Oh, okay. They go back to the drawing board. They come up with a lot of different ways that they can cut emissions with existing engines, or they can cut emissions even having different kinds of electric cars

that aren't necessarily battery-operated. But no, no, no, no, no. That's not going to be allowed. That's not what we want. Because, see, what they want is to eliminate private cars. And they want to do that by making everybody dependent on a centralized energy grid that they are simultaneously destroying while they put

heating as well as all private cars on that grid they're shutting it down and these are the suicidal megalomaniacs that are running us now so 99 year old kissinger was bluntly telling the council on foreign relations that any attempt to remove Russia's historic safety belt of the Ukrainian area was unwise. He said, from the Russian point of view, the U.S. then attempted to integrate this whole region, without exception, into an American-led strategic system. It was not a wise American policy to attempt to include Ukraine into NATO. He said, some dialogue, maybe on an unofficial level, maybe in an exploratory way, is very important. He said, in a nuclear environment, such as the outcome is, in the nuclear environment, such an outcome is preferable

to a battlefield decision. But as Caitlin Johnstone said, Henry Kissinger is warning about the dangers of U.S. warmongering, not because he's gotten saner, but because the U.S. has gotten even crazier. This is beyond Kissinger is where we are right now, I guess. So, you know, it is, even as they're doing this, you know, Ukraine is saying, yeah,

and even though we said we're not going to launch missiles into Russia, we can do that, and into regular Russia, but certainly into areas that now Russia says is ours. You know, they've now declared these are our territories and said, well, no, they're not. There are territories. And that's going to be the trigger, I think, that's going to push all of this.

American thinker blames it all on Biden, but it's not all on Biden. Basically, this is something that the entire structure, it's not just the Biden administration, this is the entire globalist structure. Biden doesn't even know what's going on. He can't even find his way off the stage. He reads what is scripted for him, and then when his speech is over,

he can't figure out how to get off the stage. We saw that. So this is a conspiracy that is much bigger than him. He's just the joke of a puppet, the clueless puppet that they've got up there reading the script. But they personalize it and make it all about Joe Biden. They say back in April, less than two months after the beginning of the war, you had the parties involved, were close to an agreement, but the agreement collapsed. Why? Because the Biden administration pushed against it,

but you also had Boris Johnson. They won't look at this, however, as a global conspiracy. They won't look at it as a fourth turning. Instead, they see this, well, Boris Johnson is just doing what he's told by Biden. And uh you know biden is the mastermind with all this stuff no it really is what we have seen in this last week the uh push to uh annex these areas now you've got a conflict over you know well you're attacking russia well no we're not we're you know attacking you because you're in our own territory. Then the Nord Stream situation, all of this. And now following that, the bragging over the weekend by Blinken saying, yeah, this is great. This is exactly what we wanted.

All of that is just designed to escalate things. I was talking on the Saturday show about how they have used the RAND Corporation to manipulate UN Agenda 21 for the longest time. It was something that Rosa Corey covered very thoroughly in her excellent book, Behind the Green Mask. And she wrote this before they started talking about UN Agenda 2030, before they started talking about the Great Reset, before they started talking about the 2030 agenda and how all that came together. At the point in time that she wrote the book,

it was still Agenda 21, UN Agenda 21. Sometime in the 21st century, we're going to do this. Now they've got a very specific date. They have allied themselves with Davos, that the UN has. But at that time, she was talking about, and I couldn't remember, maybe go back and look it up,

I couldn't remember what they called the program that the Rand Corporation had. And they were running it in various places. They ran it in Austin as well. And we reported on that. They would bring in people in the community and they would push an agenda on them and get them to think that it was their idea

instead of it being pushed on them. This is the Rand Corporation that does this type of thing. I went back and looked up the name of it because I'd forgotten. It was a Delphi program, the Delphi program. You can find out more about that if you want to research it. But basically, it's getting a group of people to accept a point of view that's actually being imposed on them and make them think that they arrived at that conclusion. So it's a very careful procedure that was developed by the Rand Corporation.

It goes back to the Cold War. It's a kind of psychological manipulation, the Delphi approach. And it is kind of interesting that the RAND Corporation, we've had some leaked documents that appear to be from the RAND Corporation. Of course, they're not going to admit it. Showing that before the Ukraine war, the U.S. had planned the European energy crisis and an economic collapse in Europe in order to save the U.S. had planned the European energy crisis and an economic collapse in Europe

in order to save the U.S. economy. This is the way these things operate. So let's skip over and talk about what's happening with the pharmaceutical bros. We have yet another young person, another, not in this particular case, a young doctor. This is a medical student, 20 years old. And her family posted that she got vaccinated so she could participate in nursing school clinical studies that were there, part of her education there. So she got vaccinated and within one day she died from a heart attack. Healthy 20 year old girl.

Just a coincidence, I'm sure. Right. And even the parents are afraid to call it what it is. The mom said on Facebook, I can't say for sure that there's a link, but our beautiful 20 year old healthy daughter, Reagan Lewis had a COVID shot yesterday so she could participate in her clinicals. Today she went into cardiac arrest and has been flown to Kearney. She's on a ventilator, but she then died. She was putting that out as a prayer request. As this is happening,

the FDA is fighting a FOIA request from the Epoch Times to get information about autopsies of people who died after getting the COVID-19 vaccines. And the excuse that the FDA is making is, well, we can't release that because that would have personal information. As if the FDA had never seen a redacted document. It's easy to redact all the personal information that's there. They just don't want it released. This is how criminal the FDA is, how complicit they are, how they have partnered with Pfizer, how they continue to try to hide any incriminating evidence against them as well, because they are partners in this conspiracy.

You see, this is no longer simply about protecting Pfizer. This is about protecting them. And this is why it's going to be increasingly difficult for us to get to the truth because the people who have pushed this and who have knowledge about it are going to be doubling down now because they need to protect themselves from what is coming. So they're refusing to release the results of these autopsies. They say that they've never heard a redaction. They don't know how to do that.

Geesebusters, geesebusters, thank you very much. I appreciate the tip on Rockfin. Thank you very much. So the FDA declined to release any reports claiming that they don't know how to do that. They cited federal law says enables agencies to withhold information if the agency reasonably foresees that the disclosure would harm an interest protected by the exemption. They said the exemption being personnel and medical files

and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. What a pathetic lie these people are. Naomi Wolf said the elites are covering up deadly vaccine complicity and that it is a massive crime. She's right, but it's not just the elites. Now this percolates down through the bureaucracies.

Anybody that hasn't already blown the whistle is now probably going to be engaged as part of the coverup. It's going to be harder as time goes by. It's going to be harder and harder for people to escape that. You even see it in the media. The people like Alex, the people like others. I can't remember the other guy. I talked about him quite some time.

Wayne Allen Root. Saying, hey, Trump, here's the way that you do this. You've got to tell people that you didn't know. It's past time that you've got to say you didn't know. Well, they knew they know now they still true cheer Trump. Are they complicit? Right. Remember it was in August that Alex said, well, you know, I'm

giving Trump another 30 days. You know, if he hasn't come clean by September 23rd or 24th, I forget what the exact date was. Oh, then I'm going to have to just, uh, you know, distance myself from him once again, before I suck up to him once again. No, they're all complicit. The media who did it, the bureaucracies who did it, the agencies who are still covering up for Pfizer, they're all part of this. The one degree or the other, the unwillingness of America's elites to confront the severe harm caused by the COVID vaccines and the pandemic restrictions makes them complicit in the massive crimes.

And of course, it was a cover-up at the very beginning of this. Don't worry, Trump has got it. He's got it. This is not going to be the bad Gates stuff. He's got this. He really does. He's playing 40 chess. He's going to protect us.

He's going to fire Fauci. He really is. You just watch. He's got to get to this election. The most important thing right now is that he went, and he's got to get through this election. Then after that, the most important thing is that he stay in office. So send us your money. Keep him in office. These people who seem so nice, says Naomi Wolf, turn out to be monsters and barbarians when it comes to enabling and condoning what is turning out to be a massive, massive crime. And as more and more is being revealed, she said, they're now complicit in massive crime. And they're going to double down to hide that.

By the way, the Pfizer CEO has now bailed on testimony before the European Union after a highlight has shown secretive talks between Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, and Ursula von der Leyen, who is the EU chief honcho. So she was making secret talks with him, doing an end run around what the European Union was doing. Remember, I played for this about a year ago. It was actually before the vaccine mandate orders dropped by Biden. You had several European members of parliament who held a press conference. And they said, we demanded to know what the agreements were about and what was said.

And said, this is what we got. And they held it up. And remember, it was redacted, every single page. So can you believe this? Look at this. You know, there's nothing but black marks all over. And so the FDA is pretending, well, we can't give you any information about the autopsy data that we have because it would violate people's privacy.

You don't know how to redact stuff. That's all we get from these people. And, of course, there was a lot of secret backroom dealing that we already knew about. From Central and South America, there were whistles that were blown by trade organizations talking about two of the countries, Argentina and Brazil, said we would not submit to the kind of blackmail that Pfizer was trying to do. A third country also anonymously told Stat News, actually it was a British investigation that found it out, and it was published in trade publication stat news. And they talked about how Pfizer was demanding not only legal immunity from,

uh, you know, putting this thing together, but also legal immunity, you know, from the design and the development of it, which is what Fauci and others got for them, but also immunity from manufacturing defects and anything else that they would do.

So it's not just immunity from the design of the vaccine that we rushed out without testing. But then if you have any kind of criminal negligent actions in terms of shipping, in terms of storage, in terms of manufacturing, in terms of, for instance, dosages that we've now seen, that the dosages range from 3 to 100 micrograms. Any of that kind of stuff, they would be held harmless for. Furthermore, they wanted to have sovereign property outside of those particular countries. So if you're talking about Argentina or Brazil,

they say, well, you've got embassies in other countries, so we would like that to be put up as collateral. I said, what is this? What is this about? And that was widely reported in India, but it was completely silent for the most part here in the U.S. And as I said, if they're looking for that kind of, if they're looking for collateral assets outside of the country,

that means that they are concerned that they would be criminally negligent and not just negligent in terms of manufacturing and other things like that, that they want to have some money outside of the country set up in foreign accounts for them. So with all of that, you now have information coming out

about the EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen talking to Albert Bourla outside of official channels before they struck a multi-billion euro vaccine deal. The report by the European Court of Auditors found that von der Leyen had been directly involved in preliminary negotiations for the EU's biggest vaccine contract, up to 1.8 billion doses of the Pfizer jab back in May 2021. This was a departure from the negotiating procedure followed with other contracts where a joint negotiating team made up of officials from the Commission

and member countries conducted exploratory talks, says Politico. In April, von der Leyen admitted that she had been texting with Borla for a month straight while they were negotiating the massive contract. Two months later, the text disappeared, triggering accusations of maladministration by the EU's ombudsman, Emily O'Reilly. Well, you know, it's just corruption. She's probably giving him inside information saying, you know, this is what they're prepared to do. This is what you need to offer. This is who you need to talk to and all the rest of this stuff, uh,

Borla and Vonderladen cozy relationship was noted last year by even the New York times. It's a New York times and Politico that are pointing out this stuff, uh, because it's not domestic. And, uh, this is where we're headed. You know, it's not just the money that the pharmaceutical companies are going to make selling the vaccines. It's the knock-on bonanza that they're going to make treating the adverse effects of these things. I mean, we've seen massive increase, and they call it non-COVID deaths. It's not even respiratory illness. We've seen all kinds of conditions that have come up. It's going to be a bonanza for the pharmaceutical industry, and it's just getting started.

This article from Daily Skeptic says GlaxoSmithKline doesn't even manufacture a COVID vaccine, but they're going to make a lot of money off of the COVID vaccine. They focused simply on one adverse effect. And that is the shingles that a lot of people who are getting vaccinated get. Sales of GlaxoSmithKline's shingles vaccine, Shingrix, was the main driver of growth in sales that more than doubled in the second quarter.

Shingritz is a relatively new shingles vaccine. He says that my doctor tells me it's considered to be an improvement on Zostervax, the traditional shingles vaccine. However, this new one is not cheap. A two-course dose in Hong Kong costs 600 pounds. In the UK, it costs 440 pounds. In the US, about $300. Allowing for distributor and retail margins,

I estimate that GlaxoSmithKline's income would be about a third of the retail price. You see, that's one of the reasons why you see every retail store pushing these vaccines because they get a pretty good markup on this as well. They make a lot of money off of this. They're not doing it for free. It's not a charity. So sales of the GSK vaccine for shingles doubled to 731 million pounds. And that was an increase from 366 million in just one quarter. He says shingles is not a life-threatening and generally affects people over 50. It affects persons who previously had chickenpox or the vaccines for that. Shingles attacks the nervous system, especially nerve endings,

and is therefore intensely painful. It says, given the cost of this vaccine and weighing up the public benefit, would most countries or patients really switch to Shinglets from the much cheaper Zostervax? Why would you use something that is, you know, we've got this cheaper drug that's been around for vaccine even for a long time. So why would you use this? Well, he gives his personal experience again.

He says, I may have the answer. In my 50s, I twice had shingles and I can vouch for how painful it is. Since then, I've had the traditional shingles vaccine jab every few years. We had a crash, so we're back. Sorry about that. And even though Rockfin is not back, I want to thank Joe Pappas. Thank you very much for the tip. And he was just talking about the fact that J.J. Watts, NFL player, had to have his heart

shocked back to normal. Yes. Will it ever be back to normal? Another weekend of seeing unexpected deaths on my social media of 30-year-olds. But we're not allowed to know. I mean, this is part of the cover-up. They're not even trying to hide the fact that they're covering this stuff up. And as we look at the way that this is rolling out,

it's just another profit center for these people. You look at the massive, again, another company that I talked about last week, Biogen, which had no COVID vaccine, but they had the same kind of greed. It settled for nearly a billion dollars on accusations that they had used the same type of tactics

that Purdue Pharmaceutical had used to push opioids. All kinds of bribes to doctors, even prostitutes, was what was involved with Sackler Pharmaceutical and Purdue in terms of selling highly addicted opioid pain medication. You had people who were injured, trusted their doctors, and their doctors got them addicted. These are not people who are out there looking for a joy ride or to have some fun. And so that is the amazing tragedy.

But it is apparently a standard procedure for a lot of these drug companies. And so Biogen had allegations that they were doing the same thing to push their multiple sclerosis drug. One of the guys that tried to stop it was fired. He became a whistleblower. And I looked at that and I said, well, that's kind of interesting that they would settle for that much money. Within two days, they released their new Alzheimer's drug.

And this is essentially the same tactic and strategy of a drug that they had pushed out a year ago that would have bankrupted Medicare and Medicaid and our healthcare system, charging $56,000 a year for baby boomers to use it as a preventative for Alzheimer's, even though it only had a claimed efficacy rate of 27%. So they went back to the drawing board, went back and did some more studies because CMS said, well, we're not going to reimburse for that class of drugs. So they went back to the drawing board and they did some other things and now have released, again, everybody said, oh, this is much better than we thought, about 25% efficacy,

but their stock shot up by 45%. And they haven't talked about what price it's going to be, but they'll find a way to profit from it. So going back to the study where the guy was talking about shingles, he said, I decided that I would not spend 600 pounds. Instead, I set about researching it on the internet. When I did that with my cardiologist and questioned some of the things that he was wanting to do, I really regret some of the things that, you know, when I had the heart attack,

I really regret having that stent put in, frankly. I just assumed that it's going to make things worse and make another one inevitable. But when I pushed back on some of the things that he wanted to put me on, cholesterol medicine and stuff like that, he said, oh, you've been talking to Dr. Google, haven't you? And I said, yeah, it's my body. And I take an interest in what's going on. I'm not going to blindly follow your orders. He's not my doctor anymore. But this guy went to the internet and he said, since then, what has transpired is that shingles is a recognized reaction to the Pfizer vaccine in older people. It is an inflammation of the nerves and nerve endings. The mRNA vaccines are now known to affect the nervous system in a

number of different ways. It appears that triggering shingles is just one of them, or else it's a result of a temporary depression of the immune system as some have suggested either way uh it's just a world of effects and the most obvious ones like we're talking about here jj watts having a heart issue oh yeah it's just normal now it's normal for kids bring your kids in we we treat myocarditis for kids all the time now. The same thing they did with autism. Don't worry about it. It's fine. It's normal to have autism now. When are we going to push back against this? You know, it's such a sad video to see that lady who said,

I saw the sudden adult death syndrome. I saw that it was happening with people talking about the vaccine connection. She realized that that was sudden infant death syndrome that killed her one or two-year-old child. Happened right after the child was vaccinated. And she was in tears. She said, I thought I was doing the right thing for him. People are going to figure this out. No matter how many government bureaucrats, no matter how many politicians andrats, no matter how many

politicians and prostitutes are covering for them, people are going to figure out how they've been lied to. And there will be some accountability, and if not in this life, in the next. Even Steve Kirsch is now getting cynical even about fluoride, which I thought was kind of interesting. He was right in line with the medical establishment at the beginning of the pandemic. He bought into the pandemic. He bought into all of that stuff, got the vaccines, and yet as he started looking at it, he said,

some of this stuff doesn't seem to be working right or there's better ways that we could do this. And then he saw that they were shutting down anything that fell outside of their very narrow agenda and plans. And that got him starting to look and do his own investigation. And now he is completely skeptical, even about things like fluoride, because it's the same MO, really. He says, we've been fluoridating water since the 1950s. The science is similar to the vaccines.

They simply forgot to do the all-cause mortality and morbidity studies showing that benefits would outweigh the harms. So he's starting to wake up completely. He said, at an event in Sacramento, he said a guy from a fluoridalert.org walked up to me and asked, can I give you a book? He said, after a 10-second hesitation to overcome my cognitive dissonance, he said, I'm being sarcastic here. Since we all know that fluoride must be safe since it's mandated everywhere.

He said, I said, yes. And I ended up with a copy of the case against fluoride, how hazardous waste ended up in our drinking water and the bad science and powerful politics that keep it there. Well, yeah, we can talk about that. We can talk about the history of it. We can say, well, this never happened until you had the nuclear industry as well as the aluminum industry that had some fluoride toxic waste that came out of their manufacturing processes. It was going to cost them a fortune to store it, to dispose of it. So they came up with a way that suddenly, once you put it in the drinking water, it's no longer toxic and you no longer have to do any careful environmental measures. You can just dump it in the drinking water and it's good for you then. And not only that, they don't have to pay to dispose of the toxic waste.

They get paid for dumping it into your water. But we could talk about all the different studies and how it affects IQ and the rest of the stuff, but the way that I tackle the fluoride, and Steve Kirsch goes through the history, he goes through the studies and all the rest of this stuff, but I think it boils down to this. It boils down to dose. We all know that the difference between something

that is maybe effective and toxic, and that's true not just with medicines, that's even true with water. You can kill people by having them drink too much water in a short period of time. That actually happened with some people who were doing a stunt on a radio program. They thought it was a joke to have people drink water

and they couldn't go to the bathroom and so forth, and a lady died because she had dil uh, you know, deleted, uh, diluted her, her, uh, blood so much that she died. So, uh, over eating, over drinking, even of water can be fatal. And so it's all about the dosage, isn't it? So why in the world would you dose people? Even if fluoride was this kind of fluoride was safe and effective, why would you dump it in the water? Because if you dump it in the water, you can't control the dosage. And if you can't control the dosage, then it's either dangerous or ineffective, depending on if you get too little or too much.

And why would you want the same dosage for a child that you want for an adult male that weighs 200 pounds or so. That, to me, I think is the easiest way to explain the fluoride scam. And once you realize what a scam it is to dump it into the water, then you can go back and uncover the history of who benefited from this and studies about what it does to your body. And then you can get really angry because it is the same thing that's being done over and over again. Okay, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.

Stay with us. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show well i began the show by talking about some cyber cockroaches but don't worry because it's all for your own good every time they come up with some kind of technology that we immediately look at and say you know that looks like uh that's going to be used against people they always say oh no it's it's uh it's going to be used against people. They always say, oh, no, it's going to help people in a disaster. It's going to help. This is not a Terminator robot. It's going to be used to help little ladies cross the street here. These roaches will hopefully not inherit the earth, you know,

after we have our nuclear war, right? This is coming from futurism.org. They said, worried about cyber bugs taking over the planet an inventor behind the headline grabbing cyborg cockroaches unveiled earlier this month said the enhanced insects are there for good not for evil what he did was he took madagascar cockroaches have you ever seen these Madagascar hissing cockroaches? That sounds pretty bad, doesn't it? But they're pretty big and they don't fly.

And so because they don't fly, they kind of focused on that. What they do is the cyborg roaches, they said, are helping in search and rescue missions during natural disasters. The little buggers can fit into places that humans are too large for, he says.

He says their endurance will also be better as well. So what they did was they put in batteries into these things. So they run out pretty quickly. So the time for exploration becomes shorter if we put them in little robots. They run out quickly. So what they can do is they can create a, um, a cyborg insect. They won't have the battery limitations of, uh, of these other things. And they, what they did was they jacked into them to manipulate which directions they go.

So remotely they'd be able to tell them, uh, you, drive them essentially, make them turn left, turn right, go ahead, go forward, that type of thing. Outfitted with solar cell-powered backpacks, these large cockroaches, chosen for their size and for their lack of wings, get their nerve-like appendages, known as SIRSI, stimulated by the packs, which then turn signals to them, which direction to move, depending on what operators dictate. The tech still has a long

ways to go. In one demonstration, a cockroach turned left when they signaled for it to do so remotely, but then it went in circles when it was supposed to go to the right. Still, it is a remarkable feat of science. It sounds very much like what Elon Musk is involved in. It sounds very much like an Elon Musk demonstration, as a matter of fact. The left turns work, but the right turns make it go in circles. So this is coming out of Japan, the Cyborg Cockroaches. There's some pictures there of it too, and you might want to show people. But the person who put it through, this is a company that specializes in film deposition. He says he sees broad applications for the solar cell film that is composed of microscopic layers of plastic, silver, and gold. He said the film could be built into clothing or into skin patches for use and monitoring of vital signs.

See, they already want to apply this to human beings. This is not really simply about helping with disaster relief under emergency conditions. And I think it dovetails very nicely with what Elon Musk is doing with Neuralink. I mean, you understand that they sell the idea of Neuralink as you being able to control video games or whatever that you need to be able to control with your mind. And of course, you would be more than willing to have this dangerous invasive operation, which they don't want you to see the results of what happened to the rhesus monkeys. It was horrific as they were doing it. And it'll be very easily done because they can just, they've already developed or in the process of developing

a robot that will surgically implant these connections into your brain or into a monkey brain first and then to a human brain. And it'll be just like Lasix, you know, just be completely automated and completely safe. They brag about how Neuralink is even setting up this eight-foot robot to stitch the stuff in your brain a bit like a sewing machine. And it even is capable of adjusting for the fact that your brain is constantly moving as you're breathing and as your heart is beating. So it's going to be able to adjust for all that and precisely put it exactly

where they need to make sure that it can read your thoughts and maybe implant some thoughts, because this is where DARPA and the Obama Brain Project and all the rest of this stuff has been focused most recently in terms of electrical control, electrical mind control. But this has been the focus of our evil post-World War II paperclip government. Mind control has been at the forefront of all this stuff. And when you look at this, it's just like, you know,

they're going to treat you as a cockroach. And I'm sure the cockroaches didn't come up and say, hey, it'd be great if you could put something in that's going to make me turn left and turn right. They want to be able to manipulate you just like a cockroach. And they're not going to, this is going to be driven from that side of things. It's not going to be driven by people saying,

yeah, I'd like to be able to control my video game without having a controller. Can you jack into my brain here for that? That's not going to be the side it's coming from. They portray it as that. And it's kind of interesting when you go back just a couple of years ago, you had in 2019, you had some neuroscientists as well as some ethicists saying, well, I don't think that the idea of performing brain surgery for anything other than

something that's absolutely essential is legitimate from an ethical standpoint, right? This is the way they put it. To get any of these devices put into your brain is a very, very high risk surgery. People do it because they have severe limitations and there is a potential there to improve their life. But if you're going to do this for fun, that's not a great idea. As a matter of fact, Dr. Riley Green of the Imperial College of London said in 2019, that's who I just quoted, said the idea of performing brain surgery on a healthy person is very troubling. You see, we're getting past that now. We're getting past that because we're doing surgery for fun on children.

It's going to mutilate them for life. And this is why I doubled down. I talked about this a great deal on Saturday. You understand, and a lot of people understand now, that the trans grooming and gaslighting that's going on in schools to the kids is a lot of sexual domination, and it has a sexual component to it. It has a pedophile component to it.

If the kids have the maturity to be able to consent to life-altering mutilation, they also then have the consent at that age, the ability to consent to sex. And so this is driving a pedophile agenda. But it's beyond that, because it's not really ultimately about transgenderism. It's not even ultimately about pedophilia. It is for some of them. But ultimately, this is about getting people to be able to consent to having

very dangerous body modifications in the name of transhumanism. In the same way that you see some of these demonically possessed people tattooing the whites of their eyes, tattoos all over their face, having horns implanted surgically into their scalp and things like that. This is the next level of what they're trying to push on our society, on our children. And this transgender stuff is just the beginning of that, of people who are going to be altering their body.

And a lot of this stuff is going to be cosmetic. It's going to be fantasy type of stuff, but it's going to be real stuff in terms of, well, now we're going to get your consent to have these brain implants put in. So, um, in light of all this stuff, you had Elon Musk doing his demonstration on Friday. I talked about that a great deal on, on Saturday, A lot of robotics and AI experts reacting to it said it's next level cringe. I played the clip for you at the beginning of the program about how pathetic it was. And in many ways, I think it was maybe as pathetic, if not more pathetic than having a human come out and do the little dance in a stretch suit last year, because that is extremely crude.

What he put out there must said, I do want to set some expectations with respect to our optimist robot. As you know, last year, it was just a person inside the robot suit, but we've come a long way and it's well compared to that, it's going to be very impressive. Well, it wasn't impressive. Again, like I pointed out, it moved around about like Joe Biden, which doesn't impress anyone.

Other people were not impressed with it. After a lot of hype, a prototype of a Tesla bot was indeed unveiled last night at the Tesla 2022 AI Day. And it turned out the hype was just that hype said the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, I triple E spectrum. Even before that event, outlets were skeptical on Friday,

auto evolution, which, you know, likes the Tesla wrote in an article called Tesla seems to be consistently seems to consistently believe that its customers are as gullible as fish. Mashable called the robots stiff and stumbling. An AI researcher called the robots next-level cringeworthy and a complete and utter scam. And he said extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

What they're shown was a lame robotic demo, and they bragged about solving what everyone in the field already solved years ago and didn't mention a word about any actual progress in solving the stuff nobody has yet solved. Robotics expert Cynthia Young said, feels very 101. None of this is cutting edge. Hire some PhDs

and go to some robotics conferences, Tesla. Said another executive director of US-based nonprofit startup, Mass Robotics. Said when you're trying to develop a robot that's both affordable and useful, a humanoid kind of shape and size is not necessarily the best way. Bingo. That's the issue.

What is he selling? What is he hyping? He's not hyping robotics. You know, he said that his Tesla factory was going to be an alien dreadnought. Remember, it's all going to be roboticized. Well, most of the factories, the automotive factories already are. And they don't need to have robots that look like human beings. They're very specialized arms that do assembly, painting, welding, and things like that.

So that's really the practical application of robots. What Elon Musk is selling is a package that comes out of the technocratic elite. And this is why you need to use discernment about him. Not only is he highly beloved by the deep state, highly rewarded by them, he is the king of crony capitalism. If they got something that they want to do, they give him billions and billions of dollars to do it, and he goes out and he hires some people who can get it done.

They found that he is more efficient, for example, in terms of launching satellites than NASA is, so they give him lots of money to do that. And he does things for the deep state. He does things for the CIA. And if you go back and you look at Neuralink and look at how that is tied into this obsession that our government has had about mind control,

that should tell you whose side he's on. And he's very clear about the fact that he wants to merge humanity with machines. He made it very clear. He said artificial intelligence, he believes, is going to get to the point where it is going to be very dangerous to us if we see it as a different entity us if we see it as a different entity, as if we see it as the other. And so his idea for the survival of mankind is to join with it. If you can't beat it, join it. If you can't beat artificial intelligence,

become a cyborg. That's it in a nutshell. And that's what he's pushing. And so why would he do a walking humanoid type of robot? It's because he's pushing the singularity. He's pushing cyborgs. He's pushing the same stuff that Peter Thiel has pushed for the longest time. He's not selling robots. He's selling the idea of cyborgs and of the singularity. But as he's also doing this, he's talking about how he's going to use these human-like robots to replace humans. He is also preparing people for universal basic income and for slavery. And that's where he and the elites have always focused. Michael Bloomberg says we're going to have to keep people pacified

with universal basic income to keep them from coming after us with guillotines. And that's why, you know, when he jumps in and he sells that, you know which side he is on. Peter Thiel, you know, the godfather of the PayPal mafia. And of course, Thiel and Musk were the partners who created PayPal. So many of the people who became multimillionaires or billionaires through PayPal have now become venture capitalists with all these different startups. They call them the PayPal mafia, but they call Peter Thiel the godfather of the PayPal

mafia. them the PayPal Mafia, but they call Peter Thiel the godfather of the PayPal Mafia. And there have been accusations of how they're trying to get control of the national health system, NHS, in the UK. And now they've had some emails that have given more weight to that. Peter Thiel's Palantir had a secret plan to crack the UK's NHS. They wanted to buy their way in. Buying our way in was what the emails said. Palantir Technologies had a secret plan to deepen its relationship with the UK's National Health Service without any public scrutiny. The US data analytics company, this is how these guys do it, they aimed to buy up smaller rivals that already had an existing relationship with the NHS, according to emails and strategy

documents seen by Bloomberg Press. This approach would hopefully allow Palantir to avoid further scrutiny in working with one of the largest depositories of health data. The NHS is one of the world's largest employers with a recent annual budget of close to 190 billion pounds. It became a key client for Palantir. It hired a U.S. tech firm to help with its COVID response, and it currently has a 360 million pound contract coming up for tender, a deal that Palantir is hoping to win. While Palantir has so far been unsuccessful in buying up NHS suppliers, the document seen by Bloomberg shows how Palantir hopes to deepen its business with a key client, both by making key hires from the NHS and via potential acquisition.

So they would hire people who worked for the government bureaucracy. The revolving door idea, right? You know, Trump brings in as his head of HHS, the CEO of Eli Lilly. And then Scott Gottlieb, who had ties to big pharmaceutical companies, was brought in as the head of the FDA. Then he, you know, quits and he goes to work for Moderna. And the guy who replaced him goes to work for Pfizer or vice versa. I think Gottlieb went to work for Pfizer and the other guy, Hahn, went to work for Moderna.

But that's the way it works, that revolving door. It's crony capitalism, it's corruption. But then the other part of it is somebody gets a contract with the federal government. You want that contract? Well, you just buy out the other people. You buy out the other competitors. Look at what Google did with the DARPA robotics contest. DARPA has these contests from time to time. The very first one

they did was on self-driving vehicles, as a matter of fact. That was a couple of decades ago. Said, well, we need to have self-driving vehicles for the military. And so they set that competition up, but they've done a lot of other ones. They did one after Fukushima. They said, well, we're going to have a competition for robotics. We want to be able to, if we got a very dangerous situation, you know, like a nuclear plant, uh, meltdown or potential meltdown, we want to be able to send a robot into a place where humans would not go except, uh, you know, it would kill them. They might be able to accomplish their task, but they would get so much radiation that they would die.

So they created a robotics contest, and there were about a dozen different robotics companies there. And some of them completely failed with the obstacle course that had been set up by DARPA. But every one of them that succeeded to any degree of completing the course, every single one of the robotics companies was bought by Google. That's how these companies, these tech companies that have unlimited amounts of money because of Wall Street cash, that's how they buy their way into government. They buy their way in by buying up all their competitors. They buy their way in by hiring the regulators and this revolving door.

Same thing that Palantir is doing. And they're doing it in the UK, which is why you're hearing about it. So spokesperson said that some of the language that was found in the emails was regrettable, but it wasn't an accurate characterization of our relationship with the NHS. Well, it is an accurate characterization of how all these different companies run. Brian Kinney, thank you very much for the tip. He said, we should tell Elon and the others that they're doing a good job, so much so

that they've amazed us all. Maybe then we'll get bored with it all. Tell them the truth will push them harder and drive them to be more heinous. Well, that's the thing. I mean, we just have to understand what these people are ultimately about. I mean, you know, Peter Thiel, not only, as they point out here, co-founded in 2003 by Facebook board member Peter Thiel, Palantir quickly won the attention and financial backing of In-Q-Tel, the venture investing arm of the CIA.

The startup counted the CIA among its first customers and cultivated an early reputation for secrecy. Named for the all-seeing stones used in J.R.R. Tolkien's fictional Lord of the Rings trilogy, Palantir now counts dozens of U.S. government agencies as customers with a significant number in the national security and defense space. Palantir leaders have foresworn doing business in China and other regions not aligned with U.S. interests and so forth. Now, I've mentioned all of that before, and I read that because I want you to hear it from somebody else.

This is coming from the Washington Post. So you can believe it, right? I mean, that's a paper of record. They wouldn't tell you anything that's not true. But when you go back and you look at this, this is what the Washington Post did not tell you. What they did not tell you is that Peter Thiel, who was there at the beginning of PayPal, Peter Thiel was also one of the co-founders of Facebook. Facebook comes into existence just as the deep state is told, shut down this total information awareness thing. That's creepy. We don't want that kind of surveillance.

The very next day after they shut it down, Facebook springs to life. Oh, okay. A lot of people said, well, I think that came from the deep state. I think that was an intelligence op. Yeah. Peter Thiel then works with In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm. They create Palantir. Palantir is about geospatial intelligence. It's not just mining, but it's also about mining your data,

mapping political and religious beliefs and everything else in a geographical way. And geospatial intelligence, which is what the Washington Post and the rest of the press won't talk about, is a very, very big, fastest growing part of the intelligence community. Has been there since the internet started to get powerful enough from a technological bandwidth standpoint. Became technologically viable to do the kinds of monitoring and surveillance and manipulation that they'd always planned. When it was DARPA back in the early 1960s. J.C.R. Licklider coined the term. He called it the Intergalactic Computer Network.

He was a psychologist. He was not a computer guy. He was a psychologist. It's always been envisioned as a means of psychological control, just like the RAND Corporation and their Delphi program. It's just like the Rand Corporation and their Delphi program. It's just like that. If you combine Delphi with the Ash experiment, with the Milgram experiment, you combine all these things together, that's what these people are doing.

The whole thing is about manipulation. And the whole thing is tied together with the intelligence community. And at the center of all of this, it's the same guys over and over again, Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, who are now portraying themselves as conservatives and are now, you know, worshiped by the conservative press.

This is why I harp on this. It doesn't do me any good to point out these facts. It's one of the reasons why I get banned from PayPal and Venmo. And by the way, Spotify, which I did not beep that out on that Great Escape commercial. Yeah, banned from Spotify as well. So, volunteers renewing and expanding a Pentagon contract that Google didn't want to have anything to do with, definitely tied to the inside more than anyone.

Now, I'm not going to go into the details of this, but even Robert Malone now, it's interesting to see people like Steve Kirsch, Robert Malone, who just have not only become skeptical about what this is all about, but now helping to bring people along, uh, saying, uh,

this is a human cyborgs are just the beginning of what these people are up to. This is Robert Malone now talking about this. Uh, so I'm glad he's doing it. And I, I see, you know,

some people say, well, he's not covering this and that. I, I don't think he's doing a limited hangout. I think it's just getting, getting up to speed, uh people say, well, he's not covering this and that. I don't think he's doing a limited hangout. I think it's just getting up to speed with what he was not familiar with before. And talking about DARPA's connections to the vaccines and the connections to transhumanism, which is where this is all headed.

And that's why they have these billionaires who have always been technocratic royalty. That's where Elon Musk has been hanging out and coming from. We've only got about two minutes, so we don't have enough time for me to really get into what's going on in the Second Amendment. But let me just cover this one story here. We've had a couple of situations where there have been gun buybacks. Houston was one. And, well, we've had a lot of gun buyback programs. But in Houston, they got taken for a good amount of money. Somebody showed up with some partially printed plastic gun parts,

3D printed plastic gun parts, 3D printed plastic gun parts. They said, well, you know, we'll give you money for partial guns and everything. So they got a good amount of money. Now it's happened again. You know, they eventually woke up in Houston and said, we're not going to give money for partial gun parts. But an upstate New York man was able to exploit what New york was doing and he made a profit of 21 000 by printing a few plastic parts and using these gun buyback problems you gotta love that

that's it for today's broadcast thank you The common man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

thedavidknightshow.com Thank you.