The David Knight Show - 4Jan23 Medical Propagandists Lose Last Bit of Credibility in NFL Tragedy; Trump Wars with Pro-Lifers

Episode Date: January 4, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Bank robberies have ended in Denmark - because cash has ended. And soon BANKS WILL END, all local banks replaced by a central bank that "interact directly" with people (i.e., controls)2:10 ECB, European Central Bank, hates bitcoin and says it will be regulated and banned to save the planet. Climate MacGuffin takes point again14:33 Jordan Peterson is threatened with loss of medical license and "re-education", NOT because of anything to do with his practice or patients, but because of his opinions27:48 Trump Blames Pro-Life Victory for HIS Losses. His wounded ego and narcissism are destroying him46:40 Eugenics in the UK.57:44 Muslims attach pastor with acid. Blinded, nearly unable to speak, in constant pain1:02:52 WATCH: RFK, Jr on how billionaires looted the world with pandemic and how Fauci protocols killed although he KNEW about HCQ effectiveness1:09:20 What is the standard of care for people who get sick with coronavirus?1:11:55 Barbara Walters’s most interesting and saddest quotes.1:16:24 Donald Trump Jr’s new “We The People” Bible with Constitution, Bill of Rights — none of which he or his father follow1:23:35 Bingo, the "trans-priest" celebrated by his church. Claims he discovered non-binary while reading Genesis. This is NOT satire1:34:46 Is "The Chosen" pointed to Jesus or inventing a different Jesus?1:39:04 The Spin about NFL Heart Attack - Can They Sink Any Lower?1:49:00 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis: Who is at risk? Dr. Peter McCullough explains1:52:07 NFL veteran who said anti-vaxers should be jailed, dies at 38. Radio host who had adverse reaction to the vaccine, dies.1:57:48 German doctor jailed, blocked from practice and fined for giving MASK EXEMPTIONS2:00:35 Gard Goldsmith, gardnergoldsmith.substack.com, joins to talk about a wide range of topics — from a new regulatory framework for gun control to his experiences writing for Star Trek and Outer Limits 2:04:49 Gard's new show on Rokfin begins tonight, Liberty Conspiracy at 5pm EASTERN2:05:49 ATF's new approach of gun control without Congress (and of course, without the Constitution) 2:08:19 How Gard started as screenwriter for Star Trek and Outer Limits2:32:05 How the scriptwriting team collaborated and evolved over time.2:32:05 The propagandistic manipulation going on in Star Trek.2:45:25 The power of film to persuade, inspire, uplift2:45:25Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Don't let foot pain or discomfort hold you back. At Foot Solutions, we specialise in high quality supportive footwear. And use the latest scanning technology to custom make orthotics. Designed for your unique feet. If you want to free your feet and joints from pain,

improve balance, or correct alignment, book a free foot assessment at footsolutions.ie or pop in store today. Foot Solutions, the first step towards pain-free feet. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 4th of January, year of our Lord, 2023, day 1028 of the emergency. Today we're going to talk about, as I said, I believe that 2023 is the year of CBDC. So we're going to talk about how

that is being promoted already in multiple ways in the media. We'll take a look at the back and forth over this athlete who collapsed on the field, the spin, all of the immediate diagnoses by the establishment doctors. And Dr. McCullough has weighed in on this as well. We'll take a look at Trump single-handedly destroying everything that he has done. Now he's taken on the pro-life movement.

And we'll talk about that as well. And Gard Goldsmith will be joining us in the broadcast. He's got a new program that's going to be opening up. It's going to be great talking to him. Stay tuned. We'll be right back Well, there is no end to all the things, the wonderful things that can happen if we can just ban dirty cash. You know, we've been told in the past when they were pushing the war on drugs, well, you know, it's loaded with cocaine and all the rest of the stuff.

It's dirty. It was dirty when COVID was coming. Don't touch the cash. You'll get sick. And now it's dirty in a different way. I don't think it's going to be too long before they start calling cash carbon or they start calling crypto carbon because that is the approach that they're taking, especially on crypto. As I said yesterday, briefly, the European Central Bank

is already comparing crypto to diesel and gasoline engines, and it has to be banned. And so these people who want to ban everything want to put in its place something that they can control. And that's always been the point with electric vehicles. They say, yeah, we're going to treat our, they call it our proof of stake cryptocurrencies. We're going to treat that and reward that and incentivize that in the same way that what we do with the electric cars. And we will disincentivize, regulate to death, and ultimately ban any other competition to

that. And so as part of this, you see mainstream media. This is coming from Bloomberg. And of course, it was picked up by the Drudge Report because they're going to push everything about a cashless society and how wonderful it is. And so here's one of the everything about a cashless society and how wonderful it is. And so here's one of the benefits of a cashless society. Not only do you save the planet, but you can stop bank robberies

because there's no money there anymore. And it won't be too long before there won't be any banks either, because you'll be dealing directly with the central bank. You have a lot of local banks. This is why I talked to Senator Frank nicely here in Tennessee about setting up a state bank. State bank helped local banks, credit unions quite a bit during the Great Depression, helped teachers get their pay in full when they weren't getting their pay in full in other states. But the small banks and the credit unions need to understand

that they're not going to exist. They are already on the list to be pushed out. There will be a few large banks. They're too big to fail, too big to jail. And there will be partners in this in one way or the other. But the traditional bank, as you know, will disappear. That's the design. And so you won't have any bank robberies. Won't that be nice? There'll be no banks to rob, no cash in the banks right now. In Denmark, bank robberies are becoming a thing of the past.

In cashless Denmark, as the Nordic country recorded its first year of zero holdups in 2022. Criminals have found that it no longer pays to walk into bank branches in search of bags of crisp notes as falling cash use and society has pushed banks to trim costs by pulling cash services from most branches. In 2021, Denmark only had one bank robbery. That's down from 222 just two decades ago. So evidently they've been falling quite a bit because they had to go back 20 years to find when they had a couple of hundred of them. Then it was down to one in 2021

and now down to zero in 2022 and uh of course um that's a real sucker play anyway i mean it's probably nowhere you're gonna get uh caught more easily committing a crime than robbing a bank but uh that's just an aside but uh there's another kind of robbery that's going on uh if you really want to get robbed you'll go to the filling station pump and that one-arm bandit that biden is using to rob you his war on fuel again it all ties back to the climate mcguffin the climate is going to protecting the climate is going to be the essence of all of this everything has to be done to protect the climate and nothing is too important to not be sacrificed to the climate so um you have gas prices uh projected out by gas buddy

uh they think that they're going to remain high in 2023, projected to peak at $4.12 a gallon in June. Again, they don't really know, but they have a better idea than probably most people because they follow the trends and they looked at what happened last year. Has anything changed? Well, not really. We've got a temporary relief in the price because Biden has been robbing the strategic petroleum reserves and he's not going to replace them. It's all about removing fuel. It's a war on fuel. So they said gas prices would average throughout 2023,

$3.49 a gallon. Gas prices averaged $5 per gallon last June. So they think that it's going to be close to that. By December, though, they dropped to $3.32 on average. The guy who does petroleum analysis at GasBuddy said, 2023 is not going to be a cakewalk for motorists. It could be expensive. Well, of course, we've got nothing to stop this suicidal war on fuel and food and everything else that Biden is engaged in. The national average could breach $4 per gallon as early as May,

something that could last through much of the summer driving season. I don't think we've ever seen such an amount of volatility as we saw this last year. That will be a trend that will likely lead to wider uncertainty over fuel prices going into 2023. So they said California may see prices going near $7 a gallon. None of that sounds out of line, but they really don't know. As we look at what is happening with gold, gold has surged to a six-month high. Analysts expect records in 2023. There's one article after another from people who have been gold bugs and other people saying, well, yeah, I think this is going to be the year of gold. When I look at gold, and I say this all the time you know Tony set up davidknight.gold if you want to look at that. My reasoning for getting gold though is not

as a speculative investment. I thought it was odd that Peter Schiff who hates crypto, loves gold, hates crypto. He said well you know crypto know, crypto is not money. It's a speculative investment. And yet he always makes the case and all these people are saying, well, you know, gold, look at how it's going to change in value relative to a fluctuating fiat currency. As Tony has talked about many times, it's just the market is constantly being manipulated on either side. The reality for the case for gold is not that you think it's going to go up because we're going to have, as they put in this article, market turbulence or rising recession expectations or more purchases from central banks. That's not the reason.

The reason is to escape the central bank digital currency that they want to impose on all of us. And they've been very clear about what they want to do with that. As a matter of fact, I talked about this a little bit yesterday in general. But more specifically, we need to look at the details of what actually happened this last year in the European Union. You had the Greens and the Socialists. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.

That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie. We're trying to ban cryptocurrency. Calling it dirty currency. Again, you know, it's got carbon in it.

You have to do proof of work. we don't want proof of work we don't want any cryptocurrency that has proof of work we want proof of stake we want something where the authorities are going to come in and say this is worth that much or they're going to manipulate it through other policies monetary policies and things like that to change the value that's's what they want. Proof of stake. We are the stakeholders. We own everything. You own nothing. We will tell you what things are worth. And so before the European Commission's markets and crypto asset regulation, they call it MICA, was passed, it caused quite a stir due to the left-wing factions of the EU parliament opposed to the proof of work and the power consumption of the Bitcoin network. This is coming from a Bitcoin magazine. It's also picked up by Zero Hedge. You'll find it there as well. As became known in April 2022,

some members of the European parliament tried to push through a ban on Bitcoin mining, and one on Bitcoin trading. However, the foundations for further steps have been laid, even though they stopped this. They have, as I mentioned yesterday, they're coming up with an energy label for it, just like you would get with appliances. The issuers of cryptocurrencies will be obliged to deliver some kind of a report

on the energy consumption and the associated carbon footprint of the respective assets. Who knows? I mean, they're just making this stuff up, right? Brokers and exchanges, in turn, must inform their customers about these exact figures when they purchase crypto assets. This is a minefield. Number one, as I point out, a lot of these companies are simply tech startups.

They don't really know how to calculate this stuff. But you remember what they did to Volkswagen? $4 billion fine because they said they didn't properly report their fuel economy. They were cheating on emissions and things like that. Nobody died, but they came after them harder than they've ever come after any automotive company for fatal things like the Pinto that exploded and caused the death of several people.

But nobody died from the so-called emissions cheating. It was simply to whip Volkswagen in line and to tell them to stop doing diesel. They got the message. They went full electric. They even had some criminal charges that they put on against executives. They came after them much harder than they did

Takata airbags that were blowing up and sending shrapnel into the chest of people. And killed, I think, a little more than a dozen people. That's the last time I looked at it. It's like 14 or 15 people. In March of 2022, the EU parliament voted against the ban on proof of work. They tried to just ban all cryptocurrencies that are mined. And when they talk about proof of stake, remember what they're talking about is a crypto fiat currency. It's CBDC. That's the thing they should talk about in this article.

Instead of talking about, you know, and I understand that it's proof of work versus proof of stake, but you need to understand that when they talk about proof of stake, they're talking about CBDC. And so you've got Greenpeace coming out against it, even though Greenpeace used to accept Bitcoin donations. They stopped in 2021. They said out of environmental concerns. And so it was a fairly close vote to ban all proof-of-work

crypto in the EU. It was 32 voted against the ban and 24 in favor. Social Democrats, Greens, the rest of the left want that because they're looking for anything to centrally control everything. And that is the basis of this. Instead of a ban on proof of work, they agreed on including a rating system, as I talked about, like a label that's going to have to be done by these people. They're going to have to do it exactly right. And if they don't do it exactly right, that'll be a basis for taking them down. The European Central Bank doesn't like Bitcoin at all.

As a matter of fact, in November 30th, it just passed, they published a blog entitled Bitcoin's Last Stand. And in it, they say that proof of work is the same as fossil fuel cars. Proof of stake is like electric vehicles. Well, there is a truth to that. You know, we do have, when I want to talk about proof of work being bad, we do have proof that diesels and electric cars work.

And diesel, most importantly, they work to the extent that everybody can have one at the same time. Imagine that. But we don't have any proof that electric vehicles are going to be, that you're going to have enough capacity, manufacturing capacity, grid capacity, and the rest of the stuff. That's not going to work for mass transportation uh via private cars they don't want that they want mass transportation that they control everything comes back to them controlling you and creating dependency that's always been the

issue with the welfare state the welfare state's never been about compassion it's always been about control you'll come to me i will give you housing i will give you education i will give you food stamps and you'll be dependent on me and you'll vote for me right uh it's always about that and once they set up that kind of a situation then you have the same situation it's a communist plot it's a marx plot. The same thing that Solzhenitsyn talked about. He said, look, we have to push back against this. I know that we can't accept their lies as if they're true, even if we have to parrot them and pretend that we believe and accept their lies. We keep that little area to ourselves so that we don't have complete control over our minds.

Because that is totalitarianism. We cannot live by the lie. We cannot accept the double think, the double speak. We must say, all right, I know that I'm lying because if I don't lie, they're going to kick me out. They'll take my job. They'll take my home. I won't be able to eat. They'll kick me out. And that's my job they'll take my home i won't be able to eat they'll kick me out and that's the kind of power they want to have over our lives

every authoritarian totalitarian communist government has always wanted that and most of the time totalitarianism and authoritarianism is sold as for the public good, the same way climate is being sold, isn't that? So they said, this is what the European Central Bank said. It is difficult to see how authorities could opt to ban petrol cars over a transition period, but then turn a blind eye to Bitcoin-type assets built on proof-of-work technology with country-sized energy consumption footprints and yearly carbon emissions that currently negate most euro-area countries' past and target savings. So in other words, we're going to ban it.

To continue with the car analogy, says the European Central Bank, that wants to impose their central bank digital currency. To continue with the car analogy, public authorities have the choice of incentivizing a crypto version of the electric vehicle, that would be proof of stake, CBDC, or to restrict or ban the crypto version of the fossil fuel car, the proof-of-work blockchain consensus mechanisms. So while a hands-off approach by public authorities is possible, it is highly unlikely. And policy action by authorities, for example, disclosure requirements, carbon tax on crypto transactions, or holdings, even if you just hold it or outright bans on mining is probable. The vast majority of citizens says, um,

this article from Bitcoin magazine are used to thinking of money as something other than what it really is. And the central banks are largely responsible for propagating that myth. Money is perceived as something that has value in and of itself instead of something whose value comes from the interaction between the people who use it. And I would say the biggest deception is to value things in terms of this constantly fluctuating central bank currency,

the fiat currency. The euro is subject to both constant changes, like regular inflation, and traumatic events, such as devaluations. But these are ignored or underestimated. People believe they own it because they can exchange it for other things.

But of course, in an eco-dictatorship, you will not own anything. That's the point. Because once they take away your money, they can take away your ability to buy anything. And they can confiscate anything. The same mindset of these eco-dictators. And again, remember, we had Deutsche Bank saying, in order to do this, we're going to have to have an eco-dictatorship. That was his term, not my term.

And then he went on to say, and we have to have the courage to impose an eco-dictatorship. We have to have the courage to oppose that. And that's the problem that I have with this Bitcoin magazine article, because the same mindset that is banning cars, is banning crypto, will also ban food, clothing, travel, everything in your life if we try to play along with them, if we try to appease them, if we try to indulge their fantasies, and that's what they try to do, ultimately, in this article.

They say, therefore, the Bitcoin mining industry has the incentive now to become greener. The fossil fuel analogy in the ECB paper, European Central Bank, makes no sense. The energy mix of a proof-of-work network like Bitcoin can come entirely from renewable green sources. This is beyond stupid. There's not enough energy to, you know, they're banning heaters for your homes that use anything

other than the grid electricity. So they're putting everything, even the heating of homes, is going to be put on this centrally controlled electric grid while they're shutting down the capacity of it. And changing over to renewable energy is shutting down the capacity. The renewables cannot provide steady state power. And they can't transfer over enough to the renewables to take the place of the things that they're shutting down immediately. They're not giving any time for a transition.

They're not giving any time to work out the details of technology because that's not the goal. The goal is to take everything from you, fuel, energy, food, everything. And so it is foolish beyond belief to think that as we are going to put all cars are going to run off of the power that is available off of the diminishing centrally controlled electric power grid. And then we're going to put all heating on that as well. And now you want to add the crypto mining? You see, when you try to appease tyrants, you are destroying your own life. It is stupid to try to appease them.

It is stupid to say, okay, well, let's see how we can minimize unicorn farts. You've got to point out that the eco-dictators have no clothes. This is naked tyranny. And unless and until you hit it at that point, you got to attack it at the fundamental level. You have to understand that this is about tyranny. This is about control. This is not about emissions. And they've shown this over and over again. Look at all the different approaches that have been brought up about how, well, okay, you want a zero emission car? We can do that. We can try hydrogen, for example. Oh, no, I don't want to invest in the technology to do hydrogen. I don't want the infrastructure for hydrogen.

I don't want the infrastructure for anything other than people charging off the grid. You see, if you put in some kind of a gas like hydrogen or something else, or you got fuel cells of some sort, well, people are not dependent on the grid. And this is not about emissions. This is about controlling our movement through a centrally controlled grid. And that's what this is about for the Bitcoin stuff as well. And it's sad if people don't understand that,

that they don't fundamentally get that. All right, when we come back, we're going to talk about the spreading authoritarianism. It's absolutely amazing now what this College of Psychologists in Ontario wants to do to Jordan Peterson. But I guess we should not be surprised because we're seeing this happening over and over again in every area. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie We'll be right back. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 ¶¶ Analyzing the Globalist next move and now the david night show we have become accustomed to the kind of censorship over the last couple of years, 1,028 days. Anybody that opposes Fauci, anybody that opposes their plan, they're going to shut that down. But this type of tactic is spreading to everything.

Jordan Peterson, he's a clinical psychologist, and they're talking about taking his license in Canada. A regulatory body that licenses practicing clinical psychologists has demanded that he undergo social media communications retraining or he will face an in-person tribunal. You talk about communism and authoritarianism and totalitarianism. Here it is in every aspect. We got a, and I'm coming up to this when I get into the pharmaceutical stuff, a German doctor who was writing mask exemptions for people. They're going to send her to jail for over two years. They're going to fine her about $30,000.

They're going to keep her from working after she gets out of jail for a couple of years because of the masks. You will not oppose them in any way, shape, or form. And as I pointed out, we've had study after study after study, even going back to the 1980s, even earlier than the 2002 study that I've talked about for years. Somebody's gone back to a 1980s study where they looked at whether or not doctors wore masks in the operating theater. Oh yeah, it was actually better if they didn't. 2002, New South Wales and Australia said, we're going to fine anybody who makes the claim that masks can protect against SARS because they can't. And here's why.

And then after all this stuff broke, we had a German scientist talk about how the mask actually exacerbated things for the mask wear. The 2002 study talked about how it exacerbated things for people who weren't wearing a mask. It made smaller particles that traveled further and stayed airborne longer because the mask gets saturated with spittle. Same thing happens when you breathe it in. It goes deeper into your lungs. So it is the authoritarianism that is the issue.

It is imposing their will, their narrative on everyone, and having the penalties to go along with it, the teeth. Peterson claimed that the regulatory body issued this demand because he retweeted Conservative Party of Canada leader Pierre Polivere, criticized Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau and his political allies, criticized climate change models, objected to surgery on gender dysphoric minors, and warned Canadians that it was wrong for social service workers and police to threaten to apprehend the children of the trucker convoy protests.

So he says this re-education order, that's what he calls it, and that's what it is, from the College of Psychologists in Ontario, was based on complaints from his public statements on Twitter and from an appearance that he had on the Joe Rogan experience. According to Peterson, there were only about two dozen complaints in total over a four-year period. And he said many of the complainants falsely claimed that they were or had been clients of mine. None of the complainants involved in the current action were clients of mine, past or present, or were even acquainted with any of my clients. This is merely punishing people for free speech. The reason free speech was put in as the first protection in the Bill of Rights

was because it is so fundamental. It is so fundamental. It is more fundamental than the Second Amendment. I know we've always talked about, well, you know, the Second Amendment is there to protect the First Amendment. No, the pen is mightier than the sword because that is what gives people resolve and understanding about why they fight. If they don't understand why they fight,

if they don't have the resolve to fight, it doesn't matter what tools or weapons they have in the fight. It all comes from the inside. Victory comes from the inside. The will is stronger than the weapons. So that's why speech has to be attacked this way. It's very dangerous what is happening now. Especially, you know, and maybe I see it more because we understand the news from English-speaking countries.

Maybe this is happening in non-English-speaking countries. But that has always been the hallmark of English speaking countries. Things like that. Things like trial by jury, which is gone. Trial by jury is gone because people don't care about it. It died from apathy as much as anything else. And so he's got people saying,

you know, the, the psych, the clinical psychology board should only be looking at what he does with his patients. None of these people are his patients. This is a small number of complaints, and the complaints are what he is saying publicly. That's none of their business, and we should be defending that, whether you agree with it or not.

He said, we're now in a situation in Canada, under Trudeau, where practicing professionals can have their livelihoods and their public reputations threatened in a very serious manner for agreeing with the official opposition and criticizing major government figures. Oh, yeah. Dr. Simone Gold sent to jail. On and on, we can talk about this.

This became effective on January the 1st in California, that if you disagree with the public health experts, you'll have your license taken. And it's especially about the vaccines. Peterson added, if I comply with the terms of my re-education and my punishment will be announced publicly, I have already had the second most serious category of punishment levied against me and have been deemed a high risk to reoffend

is repeat offender. When it comes to speech, recidivism, he says, uh, Canadians, your physicians, your lawyers, your psychologists and other professionals are now so intimidated by their commissar overlords.

That's exactly what these people are. Eco-dictators and the rest of it. They're commissar overlords. They're Marxists. That they fear to tell you the truth. And so he says, this means that your care and your legal counsel has been rendered dangerously unreliable. That's right.

They have interfered, they've politicized the practice of medicine. They have politicized what people say in public, and they have the power since all these professionals are licensed. That's the way they're going to come after them. And that's been enacted into law, taken effect January the 1st in California. Last year, Peterson was investigated by the regulatory body after someone complained about a tweet where he said, you're free to leave at any point. And that was in response to a medical professor saying he was concerned about overpopulation.

There's too many people here. So Peterson says, well, you're free to leave at any point. There's too many people on earth. You're free to leave at any point. Now, he said the complaints did not come from that guy. It came from other people. Are you telling him to commit suicide now peterson does not say is the irony of how they're pushing suicide on people

they're pushing suicide on veterans are pushing suicide on disabled people they're pushing suicide everywhere they're trying to make it easier for physician-assisted murder of children without parental consent in Canada. This is, you know, Trudeau should be excited about that. Yeah, tell everybody to commit suicide. That's what Trudeau wants. Because this whole thing has been a planned democide. It's not a pandemic. It's a planned democide.

Death by government. It's absolutely amazing. We're going to talk about what happened on the football field when we come back uh pharmaceuticals ken block just to give you an idea uh that death is uh there for all of us you know you've got all these elites that are out there uh spending all this money these billionaires i want to live forever and i want to come up with life extension formulas or if i can't transfer my consciousness into a cyborg robot or something. Uh, but death comes for us all.

Ken block was only 55. Remember Ken block Travis. He was the guy that did all the Hoonigan stuff. Um, um, saw a lot of his videos used to watch it. I mean, the guy was an amazing driver. Uh, he got in a lot of criticism because he he would go into they would shut down areas of cities and he would go screaming through the city doing drifting and all this other kind of stuff he in london when they did it he did some

donuts around the centigraph which is a very solemn i think it's world war one memorial uh people got very upset about that. But he was famous for doing that in Dubai and other places. There are pictures of him going through parking lots and drifting the car to where the back tire was less than an inch away from going over the edge, things like that. He was a very precise driver. He just died in a snowmobile accident at the age of 55. It was very powerful snowmobile,

but it doesn't change anything. I mean, you look at what happened to Jeremy Renner, right? Helping people. He's got a massive commercial snowplow because he lives up in Tahoe and he's in critical condition because somehow that as he's helping these drivers, a snowplow ran over him.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Stay with us. Thank you. Oh You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we're going to see perhaps today, I don't know if they're going to have a resolution. It might be weeks to see who the Speaker of the House is going to be.

We had three votes yesterday, and McCarthy is now a three-time loser. As I was saying, there were five people who said that, um, uh, they were not going to vote for McCarthy before the first vote was taken McCarthy. If he could have gotten one of those five, that would have put him over the top. But there were actually other people who did not commit to voting against him that did vote against him. And as they continued to have these additional rounds, it went up to, I think, the highest was 20 people, 20 Republicans voting against him becoming Speaker of the House. So we'll see what happens with that. It's political theater.

But I'm more interested in what Donald Trump said. And I had this yesterday, but I didn't get a chance to talk about it. Donald Trump blaming the abortion issue and pro-lifers for the losses of the Republican Party. It wasn't me. It was those pro lifers who did it to you. And so I didn't cover this yesterday. Now, other people, a lot of other people commented on this when it came out

yesterday and, uh, so I'll give you their comments about it as well, but this is what Trump said. It wasn't my fault. Republicans didn't live up to expectations of midterms. I was 233 to 20. Except what he doesn't tell you is that the 20 were all crucial races, most of them in the Senate and it costs the, uh, the, the Senate race. Uh, it's a one thing to go in and look to see who is ahead in a particular Republican leaning district and go in and say, oh, you know, cause they do that.

They do it with gerrymandering. Both parties do it. Uh, the, uh, whichever party's in control of state legislature picks the boundaries of the congressional districts. And, uh, depending on the, which is in control, and they both do it, they will set up the districts so that they're going to win the vast majority of seats. And they will go through and handpick individual voters and put them all in a couple of districts that they know are going to now belong to the other side.

But that keeps the rest of the districts from being competitive by putting all the opposition party into two or three different districts. So it's very easy to go into a congressional race and say, well, okay, this guy's a shoo-in because there's a Republican district or whatever, and I'm going to endorse him. That was the game he was playing. But when he got into the Senate races where it was very competitive and he endorsed one garbage candidate after the other to lose control of the Senate. But when you look at what he's doing here, blaming and going to war with the pro-life people,

they were some of his staunchest allies. Christians who said, look, he actually shows up and speaks at our rally. Well, big deal. What did he have to say? It's nice that he showed up, but so what? And he put in people in the Supreme Court, and they voted on the Dobbs thing to say that, and they did not overthrow abortion. What they did was they overthrew the Supreme Court's violation

and nullification of the Tenth Amendment. They said this is a decision that belongs to the states. They didn't ban abortion anywhere with Dobbs. What they just said was this is going to be decided at the state level, which is where always should have been. But rather than taking credit and saying, yeah, I put those judges in there and we did a great job, he says, yeah, the problem is this pro-life issue cost us the election.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie So he said it was the abortion issue. Poorly handled by many Republicans, especially those that firmly insisted on no exceptions.

Even in the case of rape, incest, or life of a mother, that's what lost large numbers of voters. Well, nobody, to my knowledge, has ever suggested that the life of the mother be ignored. The problem, as I've said before, is that the GOP refused to talk about the truth of the issue. They have the truth there you know you look at what i showed the animated film the procedure it was a cartoon version but it was the account of an anesthesiologist who went in for a procedure he didn't know it was an abortion and i'm sorry not an anesthesiologist a guy who was running ultrasound because he was watching what was happening.

And he described in horrific details how the baby was responding to being ripped apart limb by limb. You have to focus on the truth. The truth about life does not need to be defended. It needs to be unleashed, right? And they kept it confined. They didn't want to campaign on this. It was the spineless Republican politicians that are responsible for this.

Blake Master is one of the best examples. He had this, you want to talk about somebody who was an extremist? No exceptions and everything? Well, Blake Masters' website was like that. And as soon as Dobbs was leaked, before the actual decision was released, there was the famous Supreme Court leak. As soon as that happened, Blake Masters went in and scrubbed his website. It's spineless, vacillating Republicans like that, that endorsed by Trump.

Trump endorsed him when he was an extremist. And then when he ran away from the fight, Republicans ran away from him as well. So, um, yeah, he said, plus, uh, Mitch stupid dollars.

He said, yeah, they did not spend any money as a party trying to defend that issue. You know, we have, uh, another controversial issue and that is the second amendment and guns. And that is a life issue as well.

It truly is a pro-life issue. Did you know that guns are a pro-life issue? It's about defending life, and it's about the most defenseless among us being able to defend their lives. The people who need it the most are women and the elderly who are not capable of succeeding in hand-to-hand combat, but it equalizes things if they have a firearm and know how to use it. So firearms are pro-life, and they have run those types of commercials talking about how it can be used to defend innocent life under an attack. And Republicans will defend the principle of self-defense and things like that.

But they won't defend life of a baby. That's the difference. As a party, they won't do it. And that's why I said, when I talked about that, I said, forget about the parties. Because they're not going to defend issues. The way you accomplish something is to focus issue by issue. That's been successful with the Second Amendment. We've got a lot of different organizations that defend the Second Amendment

and do it successfully. At least they've had a lot of success in that in terms of changing minds and educating the public, but also legislative lobbying. There are the equivalent with pro-life groups. There's a lot of different pro-life groups out there as well. Support them instead of the Republicans. Give them the money instead of the Republicans. Focus on an issue instead of on a candidate,

instead of on a party. Because, you know, at the same time, Trump is blaming uh the pro-life people typically christians over this he and melania are doing outreach to the lgbt at mar-a-lago they're holding parties for the lgbt to counter biden who's having the big party at the white house because they just redefined marriage in their minds. One of the most notable losses, says LifeSite News, I'm sorry, Daily Mail rather, was the Senate race in Pennsylvania, where Oz, who was endorsed by Trump, lost a Fetterman. How could you make such a bad endorsement that you could lose the Fetterman of all people?

Many experts believe that a former hedge fund CEO, David McCormick had been the Republican nominee. He could have easily fended off Fetterman or we could have gone with a principled choice. I forget what her name was, but it's a young black lady who pointed out in the debate that both McCormick and Oz were Davos disciples, Davos agents, if you will. But Trump wasn't interested in her. She was the real deal.

These other guys were phony, but she was never even considered by Trump. So pro-lifers have responded to Trump, a life site news, uh, quotes, uh, several of them. Uh, one, uh, said, uh, columnist, Ben Dominick said, uh, no candidate who wants to give up on the abortion issue will be the Republican nominee in 2024, especially one who blames pro-lifers for being a drag on the party. Is he talking about Trump? Trump who was holding parties for drag Queens just a couple of months ago. Uh, pro-life activists also voiced strong opposition to Trump's comments.

Hitherto many pro-lifers have called Trump the most pro-life president in us history. So, um, you know, the, um, he's, he's pulling that apart. Why? Because of his wounded ego, his narcissism, as his former lawyer, Ty Kopsik. He is a deeply wounded narcissist who is incapable of acting except in his own perceived interest or out of revenge. Well, he doesn't even know what his real interests are. As a matter of fact, the people who are trying to be apologists for him,

the Heritage Foundation says, you know, he's got some really bad advisors. He needs to get some different advisors. He's not taking advice from them. He's the one who's doing that tweeting. I am sick of the apologist for Trump as well. So as one said, it's poor choices, poor election strategies that the Republican Party has been employing for years, said Lila Rose. Hardcore pro-lifers won re-election in states across the country. And that's true. That's been the pushback from a lot of people.

They said, well, here, look at all of these people who took an uncompromising position on this. They won. Trump doesn't know what he's talking about. And that's one of the things that's making people so angry. He's looking for scapegoats to blame. You shouldn't have been out there trying to protect the life of babies. You cost me the election. You cost the Republican Party the election. Trump doesn't even care about the Republican Party. He's threatened to destroy it and run as a third-party candidate. The approach to winning on abortion in federal races that has been proven for a decade is this. You state clearly the ambitious consensus of the pro-life position,

and you contrast that with the extreme view of Democrat opponents, said Susan B. Anthony, pro-life America. Oh, that's exactly right. A former Trump lawyer, Jenna Ellis, however, is trying to apologize for Trump. She says, Donald Trump is not a fraudulent pro-lifer. He simply hates losing.

And he calls it as he sees it. And he doesn't know what's happening. He's, I guess he's tired of winning. So now he's whining. He hates losing. And as Jenna Ellis points out, she's a lawyer who will say anything to suck up to a client and to make some money. Unfortunately, that's all too common amongst lawyers and politicians.

Trump writes that the people that push so hard for decades against abortion, got their wish from the U S Supreme court. And they just plain disappeared. Not to be seen again. That's the other part of his message. Oh, really? Well, one person replied to that and put a graph up and said, here's a graph on ad spending about abortion.

You notice that not only did the Democrats outspend, but note that the GOP stopped spending after the Supreme Court decision. Before the Supreme Court decision, it's like, oh, yeah, I'm all about this. When everybody was going to pretend that the Supreme Court had taken over the decisions about abortion, if you take that mindset, that Roe v. Wade was the law of the land and it was settled, which the Supreme Court, by the way, doesn't agree with, right? As we see with the Dobbs decision. But if you were to take that, it's the law of the land, it's settled, well, then these guys can say anything that they want.

It doesn't matter because they don't have to do anything. And that is the approach that is running throughout Congress, in the House as well as the Senate, on issue after issue. We have turned it over to the courts, or we have turned it over to the bureaucracy. So why am I even... At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly.

18 plus gamblingcare.ie. Why are we even talking about elections in congress and that's what i said in 2020 i said who cares who the president is we're being ruled by fauci in the bureaucracy right and that's the reality of the situation so um uh one person responded ro Robert Spencer says, what the, it says Trump moves left and attacks pro-lifers. No, he was always there. That's where he always was. I mean, do you really think that playboy Donald Trump was pro-life? Uh, do you really think that, uh, you know, he was taking this from a Christian perspective?

He just saw it as a wedge issue. It was a wedge issue. And then when this wedge issue got taken away, they all ran like a bunch of cockroaches that the light was shining. Trump also apparently believes that pro-life positions cost Republicans at the poll. Yet, after the Dobbs decision, you saw politicians like DeSantis, who vowed to expand pro-life protections, won 60% of the vote. Brian Kemp said, I am pro-life and unapologetic about it.

During my time as Secretary of State, I sued the Obama Justice Department twice and won to keep illegals from voting. As governor, I'll do what it takes to have the strongest pro-life anti-abortion laws in the country. Easily won. Other gubernatorial candidates like Mike DeWine, Greg Abbott, who I'm not a fan of them on many, many, many issues, but on pro-life issue, they were strong about it. On wavering on that issue, they easily won. It was vacillating opponents like Blake Masters, who was endorsed by Trump when he was strong on pro-life.

Those were the people who lost. The media spent the summer and the fall boasting that young women were eager to abort their children. Republicans underperformed, not due to any pro-abortion wave that the media was trying to make out there, but due to the effects of gerrymandering and of the mail-in election. The mail-in election. Who was it that set that precedent? That was Trump. Trump created the mail-in elections, and then he raised a lot of money trying to not do anything about it.

He was, even if you think that he was trying to change things, the mail-in elections are the issue. That happened because he pushed Fauci's lies. He was hoisted by his own petard, if you will, blown up by his own bomb, the mail-in elections. Kristen Hawkins, president of Students of Life for American Action, also talked about other politicians who easily won and took a hard line on being pro-life. Senator Ted Budd, Senator Marco Rubio won with landslides. Meanwhile, Trump-backed politicians like Dr. Oz and Blake Masters, who had challenges

clearly defining their convictions failed to win votes. That's a nice way to put it. They were challenged to find, they were convictionally challenged. How about that? That sounds like the left would describe it. I can't really find my convictions. I remember when we were adopting, um, and, uh, we put down on our, it was when we were adopting my daughter and we were out of the video business at that point. And so we were talking about, you know, our, and they wanted a letter talking about, uh, you know, our, our past and, and what we had done. And so we said, well, we, we got out of the video industry because of convictions.

And the lawyer said, I need to know the nature of those convictions. And, um, if you were found and, you know, thinking that it was, uh, some kind of crime that we're convicted of. And I said, yeah, like, uh, yeah, that's the only way that a lawyer thinks about convictions for the most part. Uh, so this November leaders like De desantis and ted budd and everything easily won but those who couldn't find their convictions uh did not don't forget about the disastrous flip-flopping minnesota governor candidate scott jensen yeah what a disappointment he was right he was somebody who came out with strong integrity pushing back against against, at the very beginning of it,

he was one of the earliest doctors to push back against the demands that you couldn't have hydroxychloroquine and other things like that, effective treatments. He ran for governor, but he went from saying that he was 100% pro-life to proclaiming his newfound love for abortion while holding his infant grandson, something that I parodied during the campaign, said Hawkins, Kristen Hawkins, who's president of Students for Life. Virtually every state legislator who championed the Students for Life Action-inspired pro-life bills, from chemical abortion pill regulation to heartbeat legislation, virtually every one

of the state legislators who championed those was re-elected. And Nebraska and North Carolina changes in the state legislature and courts will make state gains possible. And, you know, once you control the state legislature, then you can affect the congressional representation by gerrymandering. That's what it's all been about. So why do politics dictate whether or not innocent people will be murdered? Ask one person. That's the real issue. This is the person that said that is Judy Brown, president of the

American Life League. And I think she has the best comments. She said, the answer is quite simply that the pro-life movement is in large part fundamentally focused on elections and on party. Perhaps this is a year when most pro-life Americans will finally realize that the act of aborting a child is wrong, no matter which state one lives in, no matter which political party is in charge, even if Trump is there. She didn't say that. I said that.

She goes on to say, The sad truth is that over one half of a century, that deadly act has become nothing more than a political issue. This is a travesty that has left millions of dead bodies in its wake because we've chosen principle, because we've chosen politics over principle. And because the truth really doesn't matter to us. It certainly doesn't matter to these politicians. They have positions.

They have postures. But they don't really care about the truth or principles. Politics has become ground zero for not only pro-life people, but for their fundraising apparatus, the money, the money. In the process, we've lost the truth, and it's my solemn hope that in 2023 we find it again and talk about it. You know, I wonder what Trump would do about a Down syndrome baby. Because we see 95% of babies with Down syndrome in Ireland are aborted.

That's virtually 100% in other places. So what would Trump do? We've got a kid with low IQ. Just kill him, right? I've talked about that many times in the past. We had a close friend of ours who was pregnant with twins. And she was a nurse, and so she was pregnant with twins and she was a nurse. And so she was older as well.

They tried a long time to have kids and had been unable to. And, um, uh, so the, uh, tests came back positive and they said, you should abort them both.

And she said, I'm not going to do it. And her sister was so angry with her that she never talked to her again. They both died eventually of cancer. Um, not too long after that. Well, I won't say not too long after that. It was, uh, the kids were, um, 15, 16 years old. So I guess 15, 16 years that they do not talk. But that girl was a challenge in many ways, but she was an amazing joy to them as well. And that is what I've always heard of parents of Down syndrome. They may not have high IQs, but they do have a lot of love. in Canada

in most western countries nearly all children diagnosed with this are killed and it's eugenics nothing other than that so you know what happens when are killed, and it's eugenics. Nothing other than that. So, you know, what happens when they're able to do some other tests and provide people with a justification? You don't have a designer baby?

Well, I guess we just ought to abort that child. We don't want any kids except the ones that are designed and born out of the hatcheries, right? That's where this is all headed if you talk about eugenics. Iceland. Not some, but nearly all in Iceland have boasted about curing Down syndrome because they eliminated the people. Isn't that great?

Now, we cured Down syndrome by killing all the Downs babies. In the UK, the cutoff for an abortion is 24 weeks. But you can get an abortion until birth if the child has been diagnosed with Down syndrome. You know, we were older when Karen got pregnant, and we didn't have that test because we said, what's the point? I mean, you know, any procedure that you do is going to have some risk to the child. And they made that clear. And it's like, you know, well, you know, we're just going to go with what God has dealt us, but I'm not going to kill a baby. You know, there's different levels of downs as well. The British make an exception if you want to kill

one of those people. Do you see how dangerous this is in principle? You know, when we don't value human life, we kill people at the end of life. We kill babies at the beginning of life. We'll kill elderly, disabled people at the end of life. And if you're going to say, well, we don't want those people, then what's going to happen? Are we going to start aborting people because they're black?

Are we going to start aborting people because they're white in our society? Oh yeah, white people are the ones who are hated now. A lawsuit by Heidi Crowder, a young woman with Down syndrome, who said that this law in the UK saying, well, you know, normally you don't allow an abortion past 24 weeks, but we're going to make an exception for those people. You can kill them up to the point of birth. She said this disrespected her life and others who had survived this eugenics regime. But that did not pass.

They said, no, we're going to continue to do that. So, you know, does that matter? At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Stay with us. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. We have a prayer request for a pastor who was almost entirely blinded. He's now struggling to eat and speak after an Islamic extremist, several of them, sprayed him with acid. We had a lot of different attacks around New Year's. We had the one in New York. We had a guy with a machete attack three cops, put a couple of them in the hospital until one of the cops put a bullet in him.

But, you know, this was against a guy because of a religious attack. Christian pastor, almost entirely blinded last month after Muslim extremists reportedly sprayed him with acid, left him struggling to eat and to speak. It happened on December 22nd in Kampala, Uganda. The pastor's name is Frank Mutabazi. He delivered a sermon, subsequently met a man who pretended to be an interested parishioner. The Islamic extremist approached him after church, thanked him for his wonderful sermon, before asking for a ride.

Well, he had a five-hour ride back to his home. But he decided to selflessly take the individual to his intended location. He said the man started using his phone while they were in the car. He said on the way to the main road, the gentleman started making several phone calls. The man suddenly asked to get out of the car at a location that was far from his intended drop-off. Mutabazi explained, they weren't there yet. We weren't, were you asked to go?

But the man said he wanted to visit a friend. As he came out of the vehicle, three men dressed in Islamic attire appeared and pulled out a bottle and started spraying on me through the window while shouting and mentioning that I'm an enemy of their religion, as well as a deceiver, not worthy to live. In addition to losing most of his sight, Burns have left the pastor with trouble talking and eating, and his shoulder is badly burned. He requires painkillers to sleep during the night.

Despite being a majority Christian country, Uganda has internal problems with Islamic extremism. While 84% of Ugandans are Christian, stories like what unfolded to mutabazi are not uncommon christian converts from islam face pressure from family members and so they ask in this faithwire.com article to pray for mutabazi as he deals with the physical pain and the ramifications of the attack. I had a listener who contacted me and asked for prayer.

And he said, I have a friend whose wife has Guillain-Barre syndrome. The doctors even said they think it's from the flu shot. And I've seen this for the longest time. And, of course, that was the big thing that happened with the swine flu disaster. You had 60 Minutes at the time talked about that. And they interviewed a lady who was suffering from Guillain-Barre syndrome. She had a bad case of it. They said she was never going to walk again. But she kept up with it. She was able to walk with great difficulty and braces and other things like that. But it was not Chris Wallace, but his father, the real journalist, Mike Wallace, who did that expose, how they had invented a non-existent pandemic,

how they had rushed out a vaccine, how they'd injured so many people. And again, the primary injury with that vaccine was Guillain-Barre syndrome, but we've seen that over and over again. I personally know several people who have come down with Guillain-Barre syndrome after getting a flu shot.

And so he said, I know you're not a doctor, but do you have any recommendations? And he said, I know you're not a doctor, uh, but, uh, do you have any recommendations? Uh, and he said, nevertheless, uh, please pray for them. I don't want to give their names, but he said, God knows, uh, who, um, you're talking about. So if, uh, you could pray for her as well. Uh, but, um, yeah, I don't know, uh, anything about treating Guillain-Barre syndrome. I know that it is a common occurrence with all the vaccines. Meanwhile, as we're talking about COVID for a second here, Ken Copeland just came out, the Prosperity Gospel pastor who prides himself in his gigantic private jets and all the rest

of this stuff. He said on December 29th, I will never have COVID because I walk by faith. I wonder what Ken Copeland would say if he got on that expensive jet and flew to Uganda. What would he say to that pastor, Pastor Frank Mutabazi? What would he say to him? Was he not walking with sufficient faith? I wonder if Ken Copeland has ever read Job. Does he understand that each and every one of us, just because something bad happens to us, doesn't mean that we've done something wrong, doesn't mean that God has deserted us.

Does he understand that? What a fraud he is. He said in March 2020, as all this stuff was coming down, and I reported on what he said said others like him at the time he said covet is over i've declared it's over i'm you know executing judgment on this and i'm you know calling it out they call the virus a creep well i said when he was doing that when you had other name it claim it pastors out there saying saying, you know, I have rejected this COVID and it isn't going to happen. And people like Matt Drudge took great pride in reporting in great detail when one of these pastors got sick and then started taking the Fauci treatments

and died. And that's the problem. The Fauci treatments were what were killing people. And that was taken on exactly by RFK Jr., the real reality of what was happening. He said, whoop, I got the wrong one there. Could you pull up the RFK one? If you think about this, I got expelled from Instagram because of vaccine misinformation. But Instagram and Facebook cannot point to one single erroneous statement that I ever made.

Everything we post is vetted. It is sourced and cited to government databases or peer-reviewed publications. When they use the term vaccine misinformation, they are using it as a euphemism for any statement that departs from official government policies and pharmaceutical industry profit-taking. It has nothing to do whether it's true or false. It only has to do with what the political implications are. And who is doing this censorship? It's government officials in league with Bill Gates, with Larry Ellison, with Mark Zuckerberg, with Sergey Brin from Google,

and with all of these internet titans. They have engineered not only the destruction of our democracy and our civil rights, but they have engineered the biggest shift of wealth in human history. 3.8 trillion of working people to these handful of billionaires, many of them from Silicon Valley. This pandemic has impoverished the world and created 500 new billionaires. And those are the people who are strip mining our economies and making themselves rich. And is it a coincidence that these are the same people who are censoring criticism of the government policies that are bringing them trillions of dollars? People aren't stupid. We can see what's happening. We can ask the question, qui bono? And the answer is the people who are benefiting are the people who are squeezing away our constitutional rights

and engineering the destruction of democracy worldwide. That's right, the people who are benefiting. And he went on to say exactly how these people like fauci are pushing remdesivir totally ineffective he changed the terms of what they were going to do to determine whether something was effective oh it doesn't cure anything but you know i think according to this one short test that i did that was not peer-reviewed or checked that the people who got better got better slightly faster 30 faster% faster. So I'm going to pronounce that the standard of care. Here's what RFK Jr. said about that and how it killed people. Like many of these pastors who said,

COVID can't touch me. Once they got sick, they went to get the standard medical care and were killed by that. We have 4.2% of the world's population, but we had 20% of the COVID deaths and that's all on Anthony Fauci. The mismanagement that took place, he basically got rid of early treatment. So 80% of the people who went to hospital should never have gone to a hospital. Let's say if you went to your doctor yeah and you and you have maybe a headache or you lost your sense of taste it's an early symptom that's not debilitating

and he gives you a pcr test and the pcr tests say you have covered what does that doctor now do here's what he does under tony f's regimen. He tells you, go home. You're so sick that your lips turn blue because you can't breathe. And go to the hospital, and we're going to put you on a ventilator, which is going to probably kill you. Right. And we're going to give you remdesivir, which is going to probably kill you. And see, the Chinese, the pandemic only lasted for two months. Why?

Because they were doing early treatment. They were treating them with chloroquine, which is hydroxychloroquine, plus they were treating with antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, anticoagulants, steroids, monoclonal antibodies, and vitamins. All the things that we know worked. By April, they knew that hydroxychloroquine worked. Right. And they actually knew much earlier because in 2005, NIH did studies on coronavirus that showed hydroxychloroquine obliterated it. And then in 2013, 2014, Fauci funded studies on MERS and SARS, which are coronaviruses, and again show that hydroxychloroquine completely destroyed it. Yeah, it was malpractice.

It was malicious practice, right? And so it gave fuel. You know, these people, as they would get sick, they would then go to the doctor and take his advice, and it was malpractice, malicious practice. And yet it was used because they'd made these bold pronouncements about how I have conquered with my faith the virus. Because they made these bold pronouncements, it was fodder for people like Matt Drudge and the left.

And I took that on at the time. As a matter of fact, I talked about the fact as well that Fauci knew with these studies. We've known that for a long time as well. I talked about that back in 2020. They had already run these studies. They already knew about hydroxychloroquine and coronavirus. But I said at the time, and the reason I was saying it

was because these people were staying home. I remember John Rapoport and I were, you know, he came on, we did a segment together. And it was, you know, Easter was coming up the middle of April. He said, the way we stop this is to expose a lie. How do you expose a lie? Well, everybody go to church instead of staying home. Like they're telling us don't play by their rules. This is, he never believed that it was real. I didn't believe it was real.

I believed it was malpractice. I still do. I think I'm a hundred percent certain I was, uh, uh, you know, like 90% certain it was malpractice. Then I'm a% certain now. And it was malpractice and faithlessness on the part of the pastors who put more trust in the word of Fauci than in what God had told them to do. And I said, don't make these pronouncements that you're never going to get sick. Instead, what you say is that you take the approach that Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego had. They said, we're not going to bow down to this altar that Fauci has created, if you will. We're not going to bow down to this. If God wants to protect us from the fire, he can.

But even if he doesn't, we're not going to bow down to this. And that's the approach that we should have taken. Many who did not now understand and will not make that mistake again. But going back to the abortion thing for a moment here. You know, when a celebrity dies, everybody talks about it. We had Barbara Walters, 93 years old, died over the Christmas, over the New Year's break. And there were articles coming up talking about her 20 of her most

interesting and profound quotes. I thought that was the interesting one. Everybody talked about the people that she'd interviewed, and she'd interviewed a lot of people. But. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. people that she'd interviewed and she'd interviewed a lot of people uh but um at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports

bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee you know if you've interviewed famous people uh that uh that shine wears off pretty quickly. I've done the same thing. You realize that they're just like everybody else. In many cases, they're not as good as the farmer down the road that you know, in most cases.

I would take the common people any day over the celebrities that I've interviewed. But she had this to say, you know, as we're talking about abortion. She said, children are God's way of punishing us for having sex. Well, that's a very significant quote. That is essentially the feminism that I grew up with. Not the radical feminism right now that we got to, you know, end all males, and all, uh, males completely, but you know, the kind of radical feminism that was the middle of the 20th century, that's it in a nutshell, children are a punishment and we need to get rid of them. She also said, being a parent is tough. If you just want a wonderful little creature to love, get a puppy,

you know, but not a Down Syndrome baby, right? A Down Syndrome baby has higher IQ than the puppy. But yeah, you know, get a puppy, don't get a kid. And she also said parents of young children should realize

that few people, maybe no one, will find their children as enchanting as they do. This is 20 quotes. I've read three of them where she declares her hate for children, their punishment, that type of thing. And then the final one that I think is interesting, she said, on my gravestone, I want inscribed, on the other hand, Maybe I should have lived

She thinks that's ironic Because she's got that on her gravestone I think she got one letter wrong It should say Maybe on the other hand I should have loved A loveless life The only thing she loved

Was her stardom Her celebrity Her money Her fame That's all she cared about A loveless life. The only thing she loved was her stardom, her celebrity, her money, her fame. That's all she cared about. How pathetic that she could live for 93 years. And that's your takeaway. On the other hand, Barbara Walters should have loved. She would have had a very different life. Jared Kushner, again, going back to losing the election because of those horrible pro-life people.

And again, we debunked that. That was not the case at all. Jared Kushner said that two days after the media declared Biden the winner, Trump contacted him and said, I want you to trademark the phrases rigged election and save America. You see, it was always about the money. I want you to trademark that so that we can do a, um, you know, maybe t-shirts or whatever, right. It was always about the money. It was always about his ego. Um, so that came out in some of the, um, and now that they've released the transcripts, somebody noticed that he was telling him

trademark save America trademark rigged election, uh, Trump is also hinting at a third party run. As I pointed out before, he said,. He said, because he shared an article where the person suggested that. He shared it. It was an article from American Greatness. American Greatness is a MAGA site. And I do go there and I look at the stuff

because it is absolutely amazing, the trash that they put out, this MAGA cult at American Greatness. And the writer, Dan Gleitner, said, they'd rather lose an election to the Democrats, their brothers in crime, than to win with Trump. Do I think Trump can win as a third-party candidate? No.

Would I vote for him as a third-party candidate? Yes. So Trump shared that. I guess, you know, really, he's willing to burn down any and everything for his ego. You know, he's not loyal to the Republican Party or anything else, and not that anybody should be loyal to the Republican Party. But he told the Republican National Committee chairwoman, Rona McDaniel, that he was done with the party, according to a book by ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl.

McDaniel reportedly replied, you cannot do that. If you do, we will lose forever. And he came back and said, exactly. You will lose forever without me, and I don't care. This is what Republicans deserve for not sticking with me. Like I said, the people who know him best, like his former lawyer,

deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting except out of his own perceived interest or out of revenge. I think that sums him up completely. And it sums up the people around him as well. Hope Hicks, who was his

press secretary for a while. I think that was her thing i remember when we were in washington she was the one who was the gatekeeper uh for getting into the uh uh the press um scrum that he was holding there but it was a text exchange between ivanka trump's chief of staff julie radford, and Hope Hicks, they just give her the title of White House aide, but she'd been given a responsibility over something. She was not a spokesperson, but she was kind of the liaison to the press

when I was there. Anyway, and one day she ended up, he ended every future opportunity that doesn't include speaking engagements of the local Proud Boys chapter, said Hicks to Radford. And all of us that didn't have jobs lined up will be perpetually unemployed. I'm so mad and upset. We will all look like domestic terrorists now. This has made me unemployable, like untouchable. I'm so effing mad, she said.

Radford responded by texting, I know. Like there isn't a chance of finding a job. She indicated that she had already lost a job opportunity from Visa. She said, they just sent me a blow-off email. See, it was all about the money. You know, trademark rigged election. Trademark save America. And then the other people are saying where does this leave us right so i don't know where what does it leave them you got donald

trump jr now is hawking bibles of all things i don't know that he's going to be going door to door uh maybe he, he could revive the door to door encyclopedia sales, vacuum cleaner sales, Bible sales. I don't know. But, um, you remember, I mean, he's a chip off the old block, isn't he? Remember when Trump walked down, stood in front of a church and held up a Bible. Like, you know, look, that's, that's kind of like his commitment to a pro-life aspects. But, um, yeah, it is ideal for Patriots. This new, um, we, the people Bible that, uh, Donald Trump jr. Is selling.

And, um, let's see, I've got his, uh, clip here somewhere. Uh, this is what it looks like, by the way. It is a Bible that has a cover that looks like an American flag in distress. It says, we the people. And then small print up there on the corner says, holy Bible. And of course, they got a King James version because it doesn't have any, it's, you know, there's no copyright or trademark for that. So they can use that any way they wish. And he has, as a matter of fact, there is a clip that I had, Travis, that has Donald Trump talking about the We the People Bible. Can you find that? And let me know when you see that but it is like father like son he says we need to re-up our commitment to america that's what it's about that's what you know that's what the bible is

about for him re-upping your commitment to america not to christ uh He made headlines, however, about a year ago, December 2021, because he disparaged Jesus's command to turn the other cheek. While speaking at a Turning Point USA 2021 America Fest in Phoenix, Don Jr. said, we've turned the other cheek. And I understand, I understand sort of the Bible reference. I understand the mentality. But it's gotten us nothing, okay? It's gotten us nothing. So there you go. What does Jesus know, right?

He knows nothing. It's those, you know, it's that idea from Jesus that we turn the other cheek. It's this idea from these pro-lifers that we stop killing babies, that's what's costing us everything, says Trump and Trump Jr. I am so fed up with these guys. But now he's found a way where he can capitalize on Jesus. He can repackage it into a We the People Bible. And it's just, again, King James Bible, no original content.

What they did was they also added into it. What's different about the We the People Bible? Well, our Bibles include copies of the U.S. Constitution, which they also have not read or followed, right? These are a couple of guys selling Bibles that they don't follow Christ. Running for political office, they don't follow the Constitution. Declaration of Independence, they don't care what it says. Bill of Rights and the rights and the pledge of allegiance i don't care about any of that stuff right what amazing hypocrisy um so anyway um so i guess we don't have that clip at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football

the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.

Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. Okay. Anyway, the Bible, like I said, it's a King James Bible, which they've added no comment, no commentary to.

Going for, oh, here we go. It's on here. I didn't see it. It was on the last one here. Let me play it for you. You got to hear it from Don Trump Jr. With American Judeo-Christian values under attack, there could be no better time

than to re-up our commitment to America and to the Christian values that this country was founded on. Go check out the We the People Bible, made in America, printed in America, assembled in America. You're going to love it, and I think the people in your life probably need it too.

Well, you know, the Bible's not about America. Christ was not about America. He was about individuals, wasn't he? And again, they're selling it for $80. King James Bible, public domain. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bible, public domain, constitution, declaration of independence, all that public domain, all of them, things that the Trumps don't follow. Evidently don't believe $80.

Uh, you know, typically with a Bible, you're paying for the cover, right? You can get a cloth cover. You can get a leather cover. You can get a simulated leather cover, that type of thing. Uh, but while they're doing this type of thing, we understand what is coming for all of us. It's not just rival religions throwing acid in people's faces. It's also this that we saw in the UK.

One of the most famous pictures, I think, should be of 2022. It's not a famous picture, but it should be. This is when thinking a prayer becomes a crime, literal thought crime. A Christian pro-life leader in England arrested not simply for standing in front of an abortion clinic, she was arrested for the crime of praying while standing there. Even though she was simply praying in her own head, a thought crime. In the video, the police officer asks her politely, are you praying? She says, I might be praying in my head. That's exactly what happened.

Now, you know, they've passed a law saying, you know, clearly they could have arrested her for praying alone. They're saying, well, you know, we arrested her because she's violating this space out there. Well, she should be able to stand wherever she wishes. You know, Twitter put out a note saying the woman in the video, Isabel Vaughn Spruce was not arrested for silently praying. She was arrested for breaking a temporary public space protection order on four separate occasions,

which was used to ban protests outside of an abortion clinic due to safety concerns. Does it look like a protest? She's standing there silently praying, silently praying. She's not carrying any signs. She's got her hands, you know, in front of her there. The censorship zone measure was introduced by Birmingham authorities and it criminalizes individuals perceived to be engaging in any act of approval or disapproval,

or any attempted act of approval or disapproval, through verbal or written means, through prayer or counseling. So if she had been praying out loud, they could have arrested her on that basis. But it appears to be that they arrested her for what she was thinking. How interesting. Now, Andy Stanley, who is a son of Charles Stanley, a very well-known Baptist preacher in the Atlanta area, and Andy Stanley has started his own large congregation there. And he says, whether your church is choosing political sides without realizing it, you need to think about that. Is your church choosing a political side without thinking about it?

Well, I think he did think about it, and he did make a political stand in 2020 and all the way through into 2021. He openly declared that he was closing his church for that duration and he was doing it because he loved people and he loved the community. No, he loved Fauci. He loved the government's orders because he was not only taking that action but he was calling out and criticizing others who opened their churches calling them unloving for having the faith to open their churches by the way if he were to put out a bible andy stan Stanley would put out a Bible that would be the New Testament only. He has absolutely no use for the Old Testament for whatever reason. It's really bizarre because clear that if I'm a Democrat,

I'm probably not going to love it here. If I'm a Republican, I won't feel welcome. He says, that's politicizing. It's elevating a political party or a political platform with a political terminology over the purpose of the local church. It is so anti-missional.

It is so anti-missional. It is so anti-Great Commission. Again, this is a guy who shut down his church for over a year and attacked other pastors who had their churches open. Why? Oh, well, because he was slavishly devoted to the government, to Caesar. You want to talk about somebody choosing sides? He didn't even do it quietly. You know, the issue is not politicians. The issue is not party. The issue is principle. And if you don't take a stand on principle as a pastor, by not choosing to do that, you have taken a stand.

But he did it very... At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie.

Very vocally, very openly about that. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Stay with us. Thank you. Decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show. Well, you know, we have a, it's a real problem. The Christian churches is disappearing everywhere in the West. Part of it is that they don't want to offer what people are looking for.

You know, say, well, we're all about your felt needs, right? Well, you got people, especially the billionaires are doing what everybody else wants to do. I want to live as long as I can. I want to extend my life. I want to extend my health and that type of thing. And they're spending big bucks to do that. Uh, so why don't you tell them the truth? Tell them that, uh, there's something better than this world. And there's a possibility that they could live forever. And we've got the answers right here.

Uh, even pick up one of these, uh, we, the people Bibles, they can find it in that event. Uh, but they're not doing that. Instead, the church is running the other way. Take a look. Take a look at this guy here. This is in the UK. And this is a trans priest in the UK. Good morning and welcome to the church of St. Margaret of Antioch in Toxteth.

And today is Transgender Day of Visibility. My name is Reverend Bingo Allison and I am a non-binary transgender priest in the Church of England. Yeah. Okay, so the person's name is actually Bingo. Bingo Allison, as some people pointed out. Perfect name for a clown, Bingo. And the interesting thing about this is that Allison, 36, is married with children. He told the Liverpool Echo in a profile piece, they, meaning himself, that's his pronoun as they, multiple pronouns. There are many of us in here. They used to be traditional and conservative.

So what changed they mind? It was while Allison was reading Genesis. Well, I should say they call him by his last name. It was while Bingo was reading Genesis and the discussion of maleness and femaleness. And Bingo, he had an epiphany about his non-binary nature. This is the worst case I have ever seen of anybody reading into a text the exact opposite of what is there. So when the Bible is stressing male and female, he created them, and they're going to reproduce after their kind. It's clearly binary.

He looks at it and says, oh, I'm non-binary, and that's in Genesis. I don't know how in the world. He said, I properly felt God was guiding me into this new truth about myself. He said it was difficult for their wife to begin with. Again, you know, I did not see that, you know. What's your name? Well, there's many of us in here. We're called Legion.

But it was, he says, it wasn't completely alien to their three young children that he's now going to start dressing up like a woman. And, uh, as the couple had already taught them about transgender individuals. Well, there you go. That's what he wanted.

It's what they both wanted. I guess. Alison claimed that the, I should say bingo. They keep referring to this person by the, um, last name. I guess they don't want people laughing at bingo.

Bingo claimed the Church of England was open about coming out as non-binary. And again, you know, when you look at this guy, one of the biggest things he said, and here's a quote from him, one of the biggest things is just being a visual representation of my community and going into schools, doing assemblies, making a huge difference and normalizing it for kids. When I'm wearing my collar, it lets kids know that it's okay.

And there's a place in church in the outside world for people like me. So he likes to hang out with kids and the color makes them feel like they're secure. It's interesting, Richard Levine, the guy that calls himself Rachel Levine, he was a child psychologist. It's funny how these guys who dress up like women like to hang out with kids. Reverend Calvin Robinson, who is now a news commentator for GB News, was a former Church of England trainee priest. And it's the Church of England that's doing this here. He was blocked from becoming ordained in the church due to his anti-woke views.

And he suggested that bingo's interaction with children was tantamount to grooming. Others said, well, yeah, it's at least a red flag when you look at what he is doing and acting with people. Well, you know, there's a lot of different ways. As I said, you know, he'd go into the Bible. He can read into it, you know, whatever he wants. He can look at, you know, I've created them male and female a binary thing and he looks at it he comes out as oh it's non-binary uh i mentioned uh when somebody asked me on a on

a comment um would i recommend a christmas movie that was about um uh the incarnation of christ and i said uh well you know i don't know there's some things that there was one that was about the incarnation of Christ. And I said, well, you know, I don't know, there's some things that there was one that was done by the guy who did the chosen. And I said, you know, I've watched that, but I don't really like to watch videos about the Bible because people read stuff into it. That's not there. And that's exactly what is happening. I had someone contact me and said, well, here's a publication. It's got 10 different points about the chosen, concerns about the chosen. And one of them was what I said. I said, I don't like to watch films about biblical depictions because it fixes an image in your mind that is difficult to not have that dominate what you're reading.

So you can wind up, you know, getting things out of it that are not there or, you know, coming to a completely different conclusion like Bingo did when he read Genesis. And that is a big part of this and and they openly admit it you know they said uh well you know 95 of the content this is what uh the guy who did it dallas jenkins talking about the chosen he said 95 of the content isn't from the bible you know they have situations in it where they have and and I'd seen most of the first season, and I didn't watch the second and third season is out now.

I'm not interested because they reimagined so much of it. They've got Matthew as autistic and things like that. But that is the nature of any film. That's not peculiar to The Chosen. He's just saying, yeah, we're making a lot of stuff up. The Chosen W, says this publication, do not hesitate to add their own ideas or opinions to actual Bible events. For example, Mary Magdalene backsliding is not in the Bible. Matthew portrayed as autistic

is not in the Bible. Jesus rehearsing his sermon on the mount is not in the Bible. Now, that's got a lot of implications to it, doesn't it? I didn't see that part. In interviews, he gives the impression that Scripture by itself is flat, boring, one-dimensional. He doesn't see it as alive and dynamic. That's very telling, isn't it? And so, you know, it's just not sufficient.

God didn't know what he was doing. I thank God God as I said before you know I talked about you know how listening to radio we used to do that old time radio we used to do that a lot with our kids now that really

brings you into it in a different way listening to a book or listening to a radio production because you're visualizing things that are there and um it's a very powerful thing and i think that god deliberately chose that time to enter time and space to show that um you know to keep people from being fixated on the types of things that we're always fixated on. Oh, look at his hair. What's going on with that? You know, anything like that.

Jenkins has Peter fishing on the Sabbath. He asked a Messianic Jew, Rabbi Jason Sobel, one of his advisors, what he thought about adding this in. He said, well, that would have never happened. It would have been such a big deal. That would have never happened. He appears to believe that reimagining the New Testament on screen will draw people to reading the Bible, which he thinks is flat and boring and insufficient. At the same time, it'll draw people to Jesus by presenting a 95% fictionalized content, it may create a Jesus with a great personality, but with no redeeming power, it may present another Jesus. And that's the key thing, because he's going to reimagine Jesus and everything that he taught. But again, going back to the film itself, one of the people they quote in here is, uh, T.A. McMahon, uh, wrote a book,

uh, seduction by fiction. He used to be a filmmaker. He studied it in graduate school. He worked for century 20th century Fox studios for several years. They became a screenwriter in Hollywood. And then he became a Christian. And he said, can the Bible be presented through the filmmaking process and stay true to what God's word says about his word? This is how the process works. A movie begins with a screenplay. It's either an original story or a screen adaptation from somebody else's work, such as the Bible. The screenplay or the movie script, in addition to presenting the story of the plot line, the characters, the dialogues that consist of visual descriptions of what is taking place in the movie. But changes to the script always take place during the filming.

Reasons for the changes from the original script are seemingly endless. You have actors' egos. I don't like the way that this makes me look, that type of thing. Or budget cuts or weather problems or location, or the executive producer's ego, or the cameraman's inspirational idea for filming a scene. You could have union problems. You could have failures with stunts. You could have the director's ego, etc.

As with other theatrical endeavors, biblical production comes about primarily through the screenwriter's interpretation of what has been written. How many times have you heard, well, you know, oh, I really liked such and such a movie. Oh, you should have read the book. It's so much better. That is usually the case.

I mean, we had video stores for a while and everybody would say that. Oh yeah, I was so disappointed I'd read the book. You read the book, you've got your own image, you've got more detail in a book and it removes content and it puts the ideas of these screenwriters and it's always a compromise.

And many times, as he points out, it's being changed from the screenwriter's position. Even if he was trying to be faithful to the book, it's changed significantly on the fly. But then there's this. Movies are perhaps the most seductive of all media. I learned this as a screenwriter, that manipulating an audience's emotions was the key to box office success. Make them laugh. Make them weep. Frighten them.

Make them cheer. Arouse their passions and their lusts. In other words, control their emotions. That power of persuasion through the film medium seduces believers who normally would recognize that they're being snared by a fictional character. He said, I've been told that biblical movies are great motivators for people to check the Bible out. Really? And if they do, what happens when they can't find the movie scene, such as the gritty backstory of Mary Magdalene. Furthermore, most people would rather watch a highly dramatized Bible story

with little concern that it's fiction than to actually read the Bible. And that's the reality of what is happening with this. We're going to take a real quick break. Before Gar joins us, I want to talk a little bit about what happened with this football. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Thing. And the way that is being spun by many people and what we should be concerned about. We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds.

It's the David Knight Show. All right. Over a quarter of Americans think they know somebody that's been killed by the COVID vaccine. And about half of them believe that the side effects of the Trump genetic code injection have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths. So that's where we are right now. There's been a real awakening to this. And against that backdrop, you have what I got confused about yesterday. Now, I apologize for that. I saw the statements because some people have put out a football player who's 38 years old, retired now, living at home. But he was very adamant and angry,

you know, adamant about getting the vaccine, wanted to jail people who didn't want to get the vaccine, all the rest of the stuff. He died of a heart issue suddenly. And then I saw him as was preparing the show. I saw the pictures of the, the guy who makes a tackle gets up and takes a couple of steps back. And then all of a sudden collapses. And he was 24 years old and playing football. And I got those two conflated yesterday,

but here's the important thing. why I'm trying this again here. Because, first of all, I thought, well, why is that now just surfacing on a Tuesday? I completely forgot there's such a thing as Monday Night Football. We don't watch TV, and I don't watch football. But I happened to come across that at the last minute on social media, and I conflated those two things together. And I apologize about that. But, um, the, uh, the Monday night football game was just suspended after that.

And everybody was so concerned. If you look at the picture of it, you see every, all the players on both sides of the field coming out, gathering around him, kneeling, praying, uh, Fox sports reporter claimed that he had a pulse, but that he was not breathing on his own immediately after his collapse. So there are concerns about brain damage. But Alex Berenson talked about it, and he said, I saw this, and he said, I immediately thought, oh, it's mRNA. But he thought, out of respect, I'm not going to say anything about this. But then he said on Twitter, I started seeing all of these doctors who had been vaccine pushers, all of them saying,

well, I know what happened to him, and it wasn't the vaccine. And of course, these articles have been done by Bloomberg and others with a cardiologist trying to explain how this could happen without it being the vaccine. They're absolutely shameless, shameless in their spin. Listen to the mainstream media and the cardiologist who is trying to spin this away from what we have seen over and over and over again. Myocarditis, pericarditis, why are those household words now?

Everybody knows it's because of the vaccine. Half of the people know that's a serious issue. They don't know just how serious it is. But, you know, a quarter of the people know somebody directly who has died from this as well. So against that backdrop and against this very public event, they had to come out and come out immediately. And so this is what a cardiologist that was featured by, this article was featured by

Drudge Report said, said if you get hit in the chest, said University of Maryland medical system cardiologist, Dr. Scott Jerome, if you get hit in the chest, if it happens between heartbeats in a very, very small window, it can put the heart into ventricular fibrillation. And then in response to that, why haven't we seen this before? Why didn't that happen, by the way, with Jeremy Renner? He got run over by a plow, snowplow, crushed his leg, I think, and crushed his chest. But, you know, it didn't cause that to happen. It's got to be just right. And it's just this microsecond between beats and things like that. No. Shameless spin. Shameless lie.

Again, going back to Alex Berenson, he said, immediate public reaction of those who have pressed the COVID vaccines was to seek an explanation that did not involve the jab. This is fundamentally dishonest. These are people who are just like, bingo. I want to find something that's going to justify my non-binary existence, so I will go to the most binary passage I can find in the Bible and pull it out of that. No, the reality is these people have already got a conclusion,

and they're going to exclude any other possibilities. That's not science. That's not inquiry. That's not investigation. That's propaganda. That's lies. And so, like you said, you know, he didn't want to comment on it, but then he saw these things come in. The subtext to all these tweets, he said, which in some cases was not even a subtext, but it was stated openly, was that vaccines did not cause what you just saw.

And if you consider that to even be a possibility, much less say so out loud, you are a ghoul. Comotio cordis is what they wanted to call that, right? Vaccine, that's good if you call it that. Vaccine caused heart damage, that's not fine. He said, I was absolutely stunned. Well, this is what Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist as well, had to say about it. What we've learned is the highest risk group is age 18 to 24. In men, 90% of these cases are young men, as shown by Scharf and colleagues in the preprint server system. And then a report by Gill and colleagues from Connecticut, Connecticut coroners

backed up by analyses from the University of Michigan and the University of Wisconsin Pathology published in one of the best pathology journals, Archives of Pathology. Two young boys, 16 and 17, they take Pfizer and they die on days three and four after the Pfizer shot. They're found dead at home and the parents are horrified and they call for an autopsy. And the autopsy show, indeed, the kids died of vaccine-induced myocarditis. But the interesting finding is the histopathology looked like there was an overlay of what's called catecholamine toxicity. There must have been a surge of adrenaline. Now, this may have been from antecedent athletic activity. We don't know. Or it could just be in the thro just interviewed him on the McCullough Report.

He believes it's perfectly consistent with the hypothesis that the vaccine sets up the heart inflammation, which can be very subtle. In fact, some of it can have no symptoms whatsoever. And that is the big surge of adrenaline during a soccer game or during a basketball game, during sports that's triggering these deaths. And boy, that theory fits. And he has a paper out in the preprint server system outlining how that really happens. And now today it's on my Twitter feed. There's a school physician office that said that no child will play until they have blood tests to see if they have heart inflammation. So now the vaccine is creating extra medical procedures, even for clearance

before athletics. And now three countries, certainly in Canada, Hospital for Sick Children, the UK, as well as Australia, the governmental authorities have issued guidelines for doctors, largely cardiologists like myself to follow follow for screening, detection, and management of vaccine-induced myocarditis. It's as if this heart damage occurring with vaccines is now becoming a normal part of medical life for cardiologists. Just like autism became normal, right? Where did it come from? You're not, shut up, you're not allowed to talk about it, right? Myocarditis has become a household word.

Pericarditis has become a household word. Pericarditis has become a household word. We're supposed to pretend that it's always been this way? Nobody had ever heard of those things before the vaccines. And as he points out, the myocarditis is setting up the body, and then when you have this surge of adrenaline, when you've got somebody engaged in athletics, that triggers this. And it's reasonable to assume that this player has been vaccinated. As of January the 13th, 2001, the NFL was very proud to say that 95% of the players had been vaccinated.

100% of staff and personnel were either vaccinated or fired. We covered that story over and over again. I was surprised that it was only 95%. I didn't know of anybody other than Aaron Rodgers who took a lot of hits on that that had not done it. But then Alex Berenson came out with an update on the Daymar Hamlin piece. He said, a reader pointed me to this striking 2021 paper in the European Heart Journal reporting on two cases in which rugby players suffered severe heart rhythm disturbances following blunt chest trauma. In both cases, the men had histories of myocarditis,

which appeared to have caused or worsened the arrhythmias. In the second case, the myocarditis was undiagnosed and the player died. You see, it's become a common thing, and I reported on this, several different school districts now asking players, you're going to have to have an EKG before you can play. When did we start doing that? Well, after the vaccine, we started doing that. And now, as Dr. McCullough pointed out, they're doing blood tests because they're looking for the presence of troponin, which is something that happens when your heart is damaged, as in a heart attack or as in myocarditis or something like that.

Because it's not enough just to do an EKG. You need to have some kind of a myocarditis diagnosis. And in these two cases, the one that they did not know about the myocarditis, the player died. The authors found that the episodes could be distinguished from classic commotio cordis, that is trauma to the chest wall. That's what the mainstream media doctors are saying. Well, it was just a trauma to the chest wall. Why doesn't that happen before? Why hasn't that happen before? Why doesn't that happen before? Anyway, it can be distinguished from that by the underlying myocardial scarring. They concluded that the after effects of myocarditis raise, quote,

the risk of lethal ventricular arrhythmias following blunt chest trauma. See, they don't really want to find out what's going on, but it's becoming apparent anyway. The truth will come out, and the truth is coming out. Again, half of the people know somebody who has died from this directly. A quarter of the people believe that it is killing people because they're seeing this causing severe effects? You have a radio host, for example, that here's a picture of the guy.

He dies at 61. In addition to his highly rated three hour show each weekday in Seattle, he was part of the Seahawks radio broadcast team and local sports. And he had talked about how he'd had a severe adverse reaction to the Trump GCI following his second dose. He said, so I go to bed, I sleep about eight hours, which is really good for me. And I wake up at 7.30 yesterday morning, right to do show prep. And then I'm sitting downstairs with my laptop on my chest doing show prep and discovered that I'm falling asleep every three minutes while I'm trying to do show prep. I couldn't stay awake.

I thought, well, maybe I can't do the show today and on and on. He had a very severe reaction to that and couldn't do the show. So again, that's, but let's not pay any attention to what is really happening to this. Let's shut down any and all debate. Again, the other NFL player that I got confused by was this, the one who died at the age of 38, again, from a heart disease, had surfaced because he had been attacking people who were not getting vaccinated.

He said, okay, so let's get these vaccine mandates and these vaccine passports up and running ASAP. We see children die daily from this unvaccinated selfishness. He said this on September the 1st, 2021. No kids were dying. Where did he see that? He saw lies and fears being pushed in the media, but even the media was not pushing that about kids dying.

They never even bothered to try. That was such a stretch for them. When I looked at the statistics that were coming first, we had two weeks of statistics out of Italy before Trump locked everything down. And then it was confirmed in every country. The so-called COVID mortality by age looked like a standard mortality chart. It increasingly goes up with age. It's essentially zero at a young age, and then it continues to go up and then starts

going up exponentially after the age of 45. So that just looks like a normal life expectancy chart. So he didn't see that from any statistics, even from the government. But he went on to say pregnant women are at risk to protect life. All uppercase mandate the vaccine. All uppercase jail. Anyone who refuses to protect life. He also criticized pro-lifers for responding to mask recommendations with the pro-abortion slogan.

My body, my choice. He said, it's crazy to me that a bunch of men literally tell a woman what she can't and cannot do with her own body, yet you ask them, those same MFers, to put a mask on, and they literally say, my body, my choice. Well, here's the thing, buddy. A baby is not your body. A baby is not the mother's body. But this is about my body and my choice. The mask mandates and the vaccines are about my body and my choice.

Why can't he see that? And yet, when it comes to the mask, as I said earlier, the German doctor has now been jailed for giving people mask exemption certificates because it is your body and your choice. And the government has decided they're going to criminalize doctor patient relationships here. Sentenced late on Monday to two years and nine months in prison for illegally

issuing more than 4,000 exemptions to wearing masks during the planned democide. I guess maybe they charged this doctor with medical sedition or something, right? Because that's what we're talking about. We're not talking about science. We're talking about politics. So if you go against the medical politics, I guess that's sedition. That's pretty serious. She's lucky they just didn't keep her in jail and torture her for a couple of years before

she even got a trial like they're doing the January 6th. In addition to the prison sentence, she was handed a three-year work ban in order to pay $29,550. So she's going to go to jail for nearly three years and then being banned from work for three years, getting a $30,000 fine. Germany ended requirements to wear masks in many indoor settings last year. However, they're still compulsory on long distance trains. They're still compulsory in doctor's offices and in hospitals and in nursing, and on some regional public transport.

And you think, well, this is just Germany. The Gesundheit Führers, as Eric Peters calls them. The people who love authoritarianism and giving orders and following orders. Well, no. It's coming back to us. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, governments want us to mask up again. The question is why? In this picture from the Daily Skeptic, I remember when I put these things out and pinned them up for about six months on my Twitter.

It was a guy who had a mask on, and he had a, uh, smoke and he's blowing the smoke out through the mask. And that's the picture that they use on, uh, this article here as well. And, uh, and I talked about at the time I said, do you understand how big the smoke particles are?

Do you understand how much bigger they are than these supposed virus particles that we're also afraid of? Uh, if it's not going to stop the smoke, it's not going to stop the virus particles either. But it's even worse than that. It exacerbates it. So let's see how the public reacts. It won't be long before the governments resort

to introducing compulsory mask use to address the winter crisis. That's right. And they've already started talking about it in LA County and in the city of LA. Do you have guard on the line yet, Travis? We're going to take a quick break and we're going to connect with guard Goldsmith. Anxious to talk to him. My first guest of the year. So we're anxious to connect with Gard.

We will be right back. Stay with us. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. All right, and joining us now is Gard Goldsmith. It's great to have you on, Gard. I'm really happy to have you as my first guest of the year. Happy New Year to you.

Happy New Year to you too, David. Boy, you pulled the message right out of my mind. I kept thinking about that over New Year's. I was watching The Twilight Zone Zone thinking about a year ago when I got to fill in for you. And what a terrific year it's been. Thanks to you and your family. And happy 2023. Well, thank you.

You really have helped us. I mean, this has been a busy year for us. We've, you know, we moved cross country. And then we had to go back to Texas a couple of times for, uh, weddings and other things, additional moving and everything. And, and, uh, uh, you and Tony have always been there to fill in for the show to keep it going. So I really do appreciate that. And I appreciate the great content that you got and you got some new content that's coming out today. You got a new show that's happening.

Tell everybody about it on rock fan and other places, right? Yeah. Yeah. In fact, it was so great. It's just the timing of your invitation to join you on this start of the year. I've been gearing up to get

started doing a live show Monday through Friday. In addition to what I do over at MRCTV. I was able to get in touch with the Rockfin guys. Thanks to you and Tony Arterburn and how much they admire you at Rockfin. They accepted touch with the Rockfin guys and thanks to you and Tony Arterburn and how much they admire you at Rockfin. They accepted me over at Rockfin. So today is going to be the first day

at six o'clock from about six to seven 30. I'm going to give it my test. We'll also stream. Yeah. So this one won't be Rockfin exclusive. Mostly the Monday through Friday Rockfin show from six to 7 30 will be non-exclusive and then i'll add exclusive subscriber content as you do on thursday nights which is always so much fun and um so we'll welcome the gang and hop on in and people will be able to watch it on my twitter feed and um hopefully if i work it right it'll be on rumble and on odyssey as well and on YouTube, things are tricky on YouTube. You know, um, I'm persona non grata over there in some cases because of my

MRC TV work. Well, yeah, if I were you, I would just use, uh, YouTube to promote your other stuff. And those are the people who have managed to stay on YouTube. That's what they've done. You know, I've got, uh, I've got something coming up about this or that. And they use a euphemism to talk about it because, I mean, just mentioning a word or, you know, in many cases, just mentioning my name, I guess, I guess that was what got me kicked off with my

music channel that I put on YouTube. I knew that, you know, they were not going to allow my content and I wasn't going to, you know, uh, kick my content off to suit or tailor to, to suit them. Uh, but I thought, well, I can put up some music and I did that. And after six months, they, they kicked me off. And the only thing I can figure out is that they made the connection because I had, uh, the video clips that I put up said, yeah, you're listening to the David Knight show, even though they weren't listening to the David Knight show.

And that was enough, I guess, to get me taken down. So be careful what you put up on YouTube, but you've also got a Liberty conspiracy and you just had a new, uh, report that you put up about that, about you've also got Liberty Conspiracy, and you just had a new report that you put up about that, about the ATF. Tell us about that. Oh, yeah. So, yes, indeed. So, in addition to the work that I do for MRCTV, in many cases, I'll expand on that work, or sometimes they just can't get everything out. So I started up my sub stack and I have my channels at Rumble, at Odyssey and at Bitshoot that are the liberty conspiracy channels, because, of course, freedom is out of fashion nowadays. So we are our own conspiracy. So I put together a story about the most recent so-called rules.

And this is it's a combination of things that really stuck in my mind. It's a way that people tend to get normalcy bias and accept the terminology, as Orwell has spelled out, as so many people have spelled out, going all the way back to some of the masters of propaganda if you repeatedly use this rhetoric like oh this is a policy change or this is a rules change from the atf they get acclimated to it and they don't recognize what it really is which is a set of threats that people who forcibly make you pay them are now issuing in addition to the previous threats to make them make you pay them so we have the atf coming out and finalizing their rules that they originally promulgated in august on having to do with these so-called ghost gun parts and of course this is all predicated on the wondrous and wonderful donald trump and his bump stock exactly a supposed bump stock band that he uh he put out and so um the piece was just released in a in abbreviated form on mrc tv and i have the extended

version of it at my sub stack it's the gardener goldsmith sub stack and um we just opened that up for subscribers too and i have some uh some thoughts some ideas for subscribers if we get enough people we'll see it's uh it some ideas for subscribers if we get enough people we'll see it's uh it's real tricky navigating trying to get enough people to to be interested and seeing whether or not it's worth putting in the extra effort or you should just make it all free and that sort of thing but yeah what they did was uh the atf on december 27th issued their new rules which basically categorize gun parts and we're talking about basically just material that you could put together but of course is not part of a gun talking about the handle and

the lower part of it as guns as firearms and the ironic thing about that is by doing that they actually show you the double insult of first claiming something that it is not something completely illogical which is that a gun part can somehow be a fireable usable gun but second of all they throw it under the category now of the second amendment which is supposed to stop all levels of government from touching it so if it's a gun that would give it double protection, one would think, right? Yeah. So that's, yeah, that's the new video that I have.

It's over at rockfin. It's at, uh, it's at my sub stack and the article in an extended form is at sub stack. And I go through some of the, uh, some of the unbelievable, um, I, you might call them a linguistic pretzel logic that they use it is it's always been about they can change and win the debate by taking the high ground and and calling themselves for example liberal you know they're not liberal they're illiberal they're authoritarian yeah you know and and liberal use that's why some people say classic uh liberal uh meaning you know what

liberal used to mean means freedom, right? And that's how the term was used throughout the 19th century. And then it was taken by these people. But they always set things up with terminology. And what they're doing with the bureaucracy, you're exactly right, it's very dangerous. And it's about time people start to wake up to this. This has been done for quite a while with war on drugs when they talk about civil asset forfeiture. What they're saying is you didn't break a law because if you broke a law, it'd be criminal. And if it was a law that was broken, we'd have to charge

you with a crime, we'd have to convict you, and then we would have to have a conviction before we could take your property. But we're not going to do that. We're going to call it civil because you violated a rule instead of a law. And it's everybody thinks those two things are the same. But we have regulation without representation is really what we've got. And then they can give you an excessive fine because, again, it's not a law. It's a rule that you broke. And the rules don't have to follow the rules of the constitution and the bill of rights uh it's amazing the way they play with language and people have not caught on to that that fraud and it really is fraudulent what they're doing but it really is uh you know affecting these things by executive order oh it's so true david you know i'm so glad that a little bit earlier or earlier you brought up that woman kathy barnett who had been running for Senate in Maryland against Dr. Oz in the Republican final.

Yeah, I couldn't remember her name. Yeah, and what a breath of fresh air she was. And she is the physical embodiment of the reminder of the way that they use this linguistic pretzel logic, to use that term again. Because she even said, I think in one of the debates, she said she was the product of a rape. And in typical parlance, someone would have said, oh, well, what the mother or the pregnant woman or pregnant person, as they might say now, wants to do with her body is up to her it's like look we understand the criminal act of rape we understand

how bad that is but now we have to consider further that there is another life involved here and you can see that life speaking in front of that this audience speaking out for all those other people those other people who have been conceived and might be destroyed with this so-called care of the modern techno-biological fascist state of exterminating life. It's just amazing. And I think one of the things that it makes me think about, David, is Aristotle, we often hear, are we a nation of rules a we and of course that that itself carries its own terminology you're forcibly included in the we that's the royal we which has now been translated to so-called democracy or constitutional government but you

know the the the applause that people would give to constitutional governments going back to aristotle was that, and Aristotle said, if you're going to have a state, and back then, as you've pointed out, they were understood as being the city states, not these giant nation states. So there was a real different perspective there because there was easier exit from these places. If you didn't like it, you could evacuate. And the larger the area of control is, F.A. Hayek, the economist noted, and people just in common sense know, the more impossible it is to get away from it. So small areas of control, decentralization are very key. And the Constitution spells that out pretty clearly.

But I think it's interesting because if you go back to Aristotle, he said, if you're going to have a government, you've got to have a written constitution and that is often how people think are we a nation of laws or a nation of men but the men still write the constitution as lysander spooner brought up and this is more my anarchist side um as lysander spooner brought up that i didn't sign the Constitution. It's not a binding contract for me. Even the Constitution is imposed on me. As many people, yeah. Unless you take an oath to it, exactly. It's not a contract, but of course the people who take an oath to it are usually the ones who are violating it the most. Yeah, exactly. The least we can ask is if we're stuck in this situation that these people

uphold their oath owes to the constitution and um here we have the atf it's a perfect example where um and i'll just go to that piece because i mentioned that i think it was the epic times um uh writer named ozamek and i want to give him credit the epic times does pretty good work oftentimes uh tom ozamek uh he wrote firearm vendors who sell near complete pistol frames and receivers often as kits that can be relatively easily turned into untraceable homemade guns were hit with the new rule in august which required that frames and receivers that could be readily converted into fully operational guns are subject to the same regulations as traditional firearms. Of course,

it takes work to put that together. I mean, if you do it that way, you could ban the ore that goes into the metal that makes the guns. You can reduce it to that logical step. So I think it's important to bring these sorts of things up and to acknowledge the fact that people have become accustomed to these things and what it really comes down to is the so-called licensed firearm dealers you know you mentioned jordan peterson you mentioned the california statute that's going into effect now with pulling doctors licenses if they say the wrong things um and people don't question licensing and that itself when we talk about takingsings, you talk about the drug enforcement doing civil asset forfeiture.

We've got civil asset forfeiture all the time. It's just not acknowledged as what it really is. If you've got regulations per se coming from politicians, they are by definition putting a priori restrictions on your ability to be able to use what you legally, ethically acquired. That's right. They are the aggressors. That's right. And so I think those are the sorts of things that are worthy of exploration as people go into some of these stories. And that's hopefully what I will try to explore on the show, not to promote the show or whatever,

but it is an amazing opportunity to be here with you at the start of the year and to have thought so highly all about what you've been able to do on your show and the opportunities you've given me. And now to talk to you about some of the things I've been covering this week. And then, you know, possibly that I'll, I'll discuss in the show tonight. So thank you. I'm sure it to talk to you about some of the things I've been covering this week and then you know possibly that I'll discuss in the show tonight so thank you yeah I'm sure it's going to be a great and again it's what time six to seven you said or yeah six to seven thirty and

David I'm curious to see what you yeah I'd love to get your thoughts on this because one of the things that um I I notice when I cover uh news stories so much is that I have a lot of fiction that's been stored up. I just got the rights back to a lot of my books. And I want to talk about that. Yeah, but go ahead. Sure, sure. Yeah, yeah. So I've been constructing a giant mosaic of stories that hopefully will lead a lot of people who are into horror and speculative fiction to understanding God.

At first, it might seem that these stories are Lovecraftian or cosmic horror or science fiction or so on. But really what it's going to do in the end is lead you to Christ in the final few stories. But what I think is interesting is as I go through each episode of the show, hopefully Monday through Friday, I'd like to reserve a few minutes at the end of each show for reading something. Because I noticed that as I cover nonfiction stories and news and video and things like that, and I absorb this information and I feel so strongly about it, oftentimes I haven't been reading the fiction that I used to enjoy so much. And maybe it's just a natural outcome of getting older and not getting the same charge out of it or something. But there is some wonder to the artistry of someone who can put together words beautifully, J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, and then impart that. You know, they say we're made in the image of God.

That makes me think about imagination. Yeah, that's right. And so, yeah, so maybe there is something valuable. So at the end of each show, what I'm hoping to do is something I'm going to call the fight for 15, or if a story pushes it past that, yeah. Yeah, yeah yeah yeah yeah i might call it the textual 10 if it's only 10 minutes at the end but i want to read something that's maybe non-fiction or fiction maybe a piece from f.a hayek or or like i was just checking this one

out thanks to you in the beginning was information oh good yeah good. Yeah. I'm a Werner, Werner get to, or yeah. Yeah. Boy. Wow. It's been a while since I've seen that. I'm trying to remember his name exactly, but it was Werner. What was the last name? Exactly.

Was it Gert or? Yeah. Werner get G I T T. Yeah. And he is not a get that's for sure. Not like Dennis Moore. Right. Um, so, so yeah, what I'm hoping to do is is maybe give people

something historical or something out of fiction that they can they can enjoy and um maybe it might take even we might do one piece one day and then we'll say okay we'll carry on with this tomorrow and um and what i was thinking david might also be kind of fun is I want to start up a this probably would be easy to do on YouTube you know I had some script writing experience at a couple TV shows and so what I'd like to do is open up a YouTube channel devoted to quality writing narrative fiction and things like that and I was thinking you know was thinking, you know what would be really fun is to go back to when I was a kid and I used to read with my parents. And I mentioned on one of my videos, I was the little one in the family.

So eventually they would let me read as well. By the time I was about 30, they said, okay, we'll let you read. We think you might handle it. But we read Roald Dahl stories and 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and Robin Hood and things. And so I thought, I miss those days sharing that with people. And so maybe it's not exactly the same, but maybe I could open it up and a couple times a week live, I could go on with friends. Maybe get Tony, maybe get you, a couple of times a week live, I could go on with friends, maybe get Tony, maybe get you a couple of my other friends. And we could all be in little squares reading a short story, the cask of Amatillado by Edgar Allan Poe. You know, I get, I'll read a couple of pages.

Someone else reads a couple of pages and we make it an appointment at lunch where we get together with our friends. And then, yeah yeah so that's what i'm hoping to do that channel and i know i'm throwing a lot out uh for you in the audience but um in addition to the liberty conspiracy show that'll be going on monday through friday i'm hoping to start this youtube channel and it will be on liberty conspiracy as well but again it'll be a shift over i'll put the easy to put out on youtube stuff under former star trek writer writing fellow former star trek writing fellow so it'll be a little bit about that we've never talked about on this show we've never talked about your uh your your background

as a screenwriter uh working for star trek and other tell us a little bit about that a lot of people don't know about that yeah yeah that yeah. That was really interesting. What happened, David, was I connected with the Institute for Humane Studies, libertarian think tank connected with George Mason University back in the sort of early 90s, mid 90s. I think they had an ad in the back of Reason magazine. And I signed up for one of their seminars and they accepted me. So I had a week where I got to meet terrific people and talk to economists. David Henderson gave me a copy of his Fortune Encyclopedia of Economics.

I was really getting into understanding economics and political philosophy and things like that. And I had been pretty badly injured where I, in fact, I had to take hydroxychloroquine. They found my immune system was too high, so they had to mediate it. Yeah, on a couple of the interleukin channels of the immune system. So that's how I knew, and you mentioned that 2005 study that was funded by the NIH about chloroquine being a potent mediator of SARS, of COV. Yeah. Yeah.

I had heard that they were using chloroquine in February of 2020, and I looked it up, and, you know, within a tenth of a second, I was able to find that information from that PubMed study that was released in 2005, and Anthony Fauci's NIAID is noted right at the bottom. Yeah. So the fact, and I already disliked him because of his ridiculous Ebola stance and what he had done with the AIDS victims. Yeah, really bad. So, but when I saw that he was intentionally not mentioning that in any of his press conferences, I knew what the game was afoot, as Holmes would say.

You know, I knew Watson. what the game was afoot as as holmes would say you know i knew watson so um yeah the amazing thing is that you know they started attacking uh the stuff is you know well don't ivermectin you know that's for horses y'all you know that type of thing and yet now they're pushing that uh malnuma pavir or whatever they're pushing that and that really was a horse medicine i know this offered for i mean it just goes full circle doesn't it oh yeah oh man geez They're pushing that. And that really was a horse medicine. I know. I mean, it just goes full circle, doesn't it? Oh, yeah. Oh, man.

Geez. This is, it's like talking to you is like getting a breath of fresh air. It's so great. It's so great. But yeah, yeah. So, yeah. So go back. What happened was I got pretty badly injured in the nineties and I wasn't sure I'd always wanted to go out and do script writing and um so uh i went

to the ihs seminar down at bryn maher college that it would they just you know they host them at various colleges probably rent out the space and some of the young people stay in the dorm rooms and stuff met some amazing people great great people and um then afterwards i was able to get the opportunity to get funded to go work on a TV show. The IHS actually funded my salary and I worked at the outer limits script department on the revival, uh, up in Vancouver. So I stayed in Canada. Yeah, it was great. It was 1996.

I drove across the country, had an unbelievable experience and, uh, learned a lot about their medical system just from living there. Yeah, that was a bad experience, was it? Yeah, luckily I didn't have to take advantage of it. But just by I was curious, you know, as a libertarian, I wanted to find out how it was, how it was working for people. And it was not working for people. In fact, while I was there incouver i'll never forget that they had a couple things one was that they had a bicycle helmet ordinance that they said oh we made a mistake we we might have to um open up the bicycle ordinate ordinance the helmet ordinance

because we need to make room for get this turban wearing seeks of course and as they said on the radio people with big heads you mean politicians like uh justin trudeau yeah yeah he can't find a helmet that's big enough to go around his head or something oh man oh man oh you know that you wear your helmet to protect other people not to protect yourself yes exactly i'll wear my sunscreen too just to make sure i'm doubly protecting the other people i'll boost my sunscreen yeah well they're talking about mass mandates well you know we mandate seat belts we mandate bicycle motorcycle helmets and all the rest of stuff it's like oh yeah that's right that's to protect other people isn't it yeah that's amazing it's amazing so and you know know, every time we get to chat, David, there's another little nugget of something that opens up. Like you talk about, talk about, uh, mandates for the roads, licenses and things like that. You go back in history and you look at, uh, even going back to ancient Irish history, there's a terrific book about how people thought the Romans were the ones who built the roads in England. And it turns out it was the ancient Irish.

And the roads were already there. They just paved the roads, you know, because the roads are actually laid out in Celtic Irish, like a pagan, uh, lines. The Romans would not have done that, you know? So very, yeah, very interesting. But yeah, so, um, I got the road rise up before you, you know, it's like, yes, yes, I have, I have my, uh, my Irish sayings right work. May the road rise up before you, you know? Yes, yes. I have my Irish sayings right here.

May the road rise with you. I got my little poster. That's great. Yeah, so I was able to work at the Outer Limits. And before I went over to the Outer Limits, I had sent material out to various TV shows to see which ones might be interested. It turned out it was the Outer Limits people who responded, and they were very, very nice. Met some great people.

And so when that happened, I finally, after I had been at the Outer Limits for that season in 1996, I got a response from Star Trek Voyager. And so I ended up working at Star Trek Voyager in 1998 under what was called the writers guild west fellowship uh so it was the writers guild that actually paid my salary there and that was an interesting experience because as you know star trek has a lot of woke u.n positive roots yeah yeah gene roddenberry and i think a lot of that comes from these guys who went

through World War II. I think they were, they were rooked. They were tricked. Rod Serling also, he did a short film in favor of the UN. And I, I, I always wondered how he would look at things today because. Oh, I remember that very distinctly in the sixties when I was a kid reading comic books and how, you know, the UN was going to they that was going to be the path to world peace and everything you know it was the nirvana that everybody was searching for and I know exactly how they used to push that and I thought that when I was a kid watching Star Trek I thought we didn't have any terms like politically correct or woke or anything like that but it's like uh they're pushing this thing on me you know that's a very different ethic about it i don't know if that was what people liked about star trek or not

i always liked the spot character i thought he was interesting yeah juxtaposition between him and the very emotional captain um you know and then of course they always are the ones that get beamed down you know they don't ever send any subordinates down they send the commander down to to confront whatever so i thought that was exactly yeah i thought that was funny but yeah so yeah and and it and it's it's it's interesting because you know the writers i'll give you an example so brandon braga uh he was at at star trek voyager and uh here's i i mentioned this to a couple other folks online um i i'm i have to apologize to the audience in a way and um but i'm responsible for warp drive continuing in star trek so the whole operation warp drive thing

i don't know whether trump wouldn't use that term or not it might have been gone so what happened was i was the low guy in the totem pole. Yeah. At, uh, at Voyager. And this is the kind of stuff I also want to discuss like television writing and things like that on the YouTube channel. And hopefully let me interject it. That's what Trump should have called it. He should have called it the warp drive.

You know, I guess they went from the warp speed development to, they went to the warp drive where they pushed it on everybody, you know, $50 million of ad council that there's a warp drive. Uh, exactly. Exactly. everybody you know yeah yeah million dollars of ad council that is a warp drive uh yeah exactly exactly yeah we're gonna we're gonna force it on everybody it's gonna be fantastic let me ask you this i've always you know because there's a lot of writers that work on these things and you're talking about how some of them have uh you know this kind of woke perspective or whatever i prefer uh political marxist but uh yeah the uh that's

another one of these things i think they came up with that term woke but um you know when you're working with us you're as collaborative how exactly does that work i remember looking at the mary tyler moore show and of course the core of that was you know dick van dyke and you know these two other writers and they're kind of hashing stuff out, you know, comedy stuff and everything. How do you, uh, collaborate on these things? The, the, uh, you know, do you have a, a, um, kind of like what they did there? They had kind of a, a bull session or something, or do you, uh, get assigned a part of it? Or is there a head writer who comes up with a main theme and other people start to fill in details?

How does that work? Yeah, that, that, that's very interesting, David. It's sort of developed over time, I think. So if you go back to the Twilight Zone era, Rod Serling was the guy. And then he had a certain number of friends out in California. They called them the California boys, California crew. There was William F. Nolan, Richard matheson george clayton johnson

and um the man who wrote the howling man um i can't remember he died very early um but anyway um they were all friends and they worked very hard ray bradbury was in there once in a while and um they weren't on set they weren't at cbs studios at that time uh they just lived in la they had done other writing on westerns and started in radio and things like that and uh so what ended up happening was uh rod would call on these guys or they would pitch him ideas and then he would say okay thumbs up and then he would write so many of his own um and um what ended up developing and i think that it sort of happened in the late 60s and so on and you can see it in mary tyler moore as a great example of of how it started to change over you

got the writing team the writing staff and so the way it would operate for us at Voyager every day was pretty much every day, um, was we would have what were called break sessions. And, uh, there were maybe six, five or six writers on staff, um, in addition to the executive producers who were Jerry Taylor and Brandon Braga. Brandon is very pro-liberty by the way, very-woke and uh of course he created the board which is sort of a play on the cybermen from doctor who so you can see a libertarian doing something like that so um i had dinner with brandon about uh four years ago a really nice guy we were chatting and he said to me because you're a libertarian i was like oh yeah you are too i know he goes how did you know i was like because one day i had a reason

magazine t-shirt on under my shirt and somebody asked what's he what are you wearing under there and you said that's a reason magazine shirt they're a libertarian magazine i was like back then only libertarians read i knew and he goes yeah you got me so but anyway so yeah so it turns out that uh what happens is uh outside writers who might not be and writers themselves will pitch ideas. At that time, I think they had to do like 22 episodes for a season at Voyager. And so you get the outside writers each afternoon. The outside writers will come in and pitch a story. If the writer to whom he or she pitches the story thinks that that's a viable

idea, they'll say, okay, let me write that one down. Do you have the paperwork on that one? Okay, great. They'll take the idea. If they accept the idea, at that time, you got like five or $6,000, I think, for a story idea. After an outside writer might have sold you know three or four ideas then the producers might let that writer write an entire episode but typically what happened was they would buy the idea and then we would go into these break sessions and every morning we'd go down about 9 30 10 o'clock while they were shooting over at the studio um we would be in what was what was called the heart building at the paramount gate uh paramount uh studios and i actually took the bus in from colorado boulevard where the rose parade goes every morning i didn't drive and i took the bus

i was the only guy i would get off i was it was the weirdest experience like we'd be going through all these barrios and stuff and i'd be getting off the bus and like lamborghinis would be pulling in it just it made you realize how much money comes in through this spider web yeah into this locus of yeah of communication uh which itself is very interesting when you think about propagating ideas from that central area especially if they're connected to the government but so what ended up happening each morning was we would go in, we'd take these ideas, and then what we would do is break them apart. The break session, that's where the term comes from. We break them into scenes, acts and scenes.

And I would be the guy up at the wet board and all the writers would sit around and we'd sort of break it down to say, OK, we have this general concept that we bought from this writer. How are we going to turn this into a dramatic story that can also be part of the larger arc for this season? And then when it was done and all the writers, we might take lunch, then we'd come back. We would have a series of five acts. And then inside those acts, we would have a dramatic beats within those. And then I would take that and, um, I would dictate it to a secretary and then the secretary would type it up and give it to one of the staff writers. And that staff writer would be assigned to write that episode.

They would have a week, a week, and they would have to write the episode. And then the week after that, it would be shot. So yeah, it was, it was an amazing experience.

It was really, really, that's interesting. You're talking about dramatic beats and dramatic beats and uh you know when you're talking about pitching an idea and if they take your idea you get x amount of dollars or whatever it made me think about uh was it blake snyder was that the guy's name that did uh save the cat you're probably familiar with that oh yeah yeah he made all his money pitching ideas pretty much yeah He had a couple of movies that he actually wrote a screenplay for. They were kind of middling in terms of their performance and everything. But he did a great job of talking about how you take a movie and everybody –

it's kind of an established thing that it's going to be about 90 minutes. They've determined that's the appropriate amount of time for a movie. And then they would break it into beats and say, at this point, you're going to be about 90 minutes. They've determined that's the appropriate amount of time for a movie. And then they would break it into beats and say, you know, at this point, you know, you're going to introduce everybody. You're going to introduce the world and they're going to have fun and games and then goes on and you got a crisis that develops here and then a resolution that develops here. And they had it kind of worked out in terms of timing.

You know, this many minutes in this type of thing should be happening. And I thought that was always very interesting. What do you do in a TV show with beats like that? Yeah, well, that's it. Just different scale? Yeah, yeah, that's exactly it, David. You know, I think there's a schism between people who organically understand there's just a vibe to the number of beats per act or per scene within the acts. A lot of people, we just innately get it, right? Some people make like a mathematical formula out of it. They'll

read a book on how to write a novel rather than just being the kind of person who can go and write a novel. Yeah. So I'm the kind of person that I just, I, I take to stories and, and that's sort of the way that my mind works and, uh, I reverse engineer everything. So like I have, like you're an engineer and I love listening to you because you have that engineer's mind, you know, and, and that's the thing, like you can reverse engineer something. So I always know the way the story ends. And then i get there through working you know back working backwards uh typically uh but yeah um you will have about five dramatic beats uh or four dramatic beats per uh per act and so you try to you try to put those within a couple scenes or one scene that

sort of thing and the way that it's designed the it's it's either character driven or it's event driven and I think in some of the best dramas it's it's really got to be character and event driven that's why you know if you get a program like Breaking Bad that's why it know if you get a program like breaking bad that's why it was so intensely good um or if you really like the characters like on star trek um and so uh there are there are things there are limits though where for example uh i had a pitch session with jerry taylor who she used to work on Quincy and ME and things like that and um I pitched an idea to her saying well okay so the Voyager crew needs to get some money so

there's this is going to be kind of a light-hearted story it's going to be kind of like the sting they're going to pull a sting she goes oh guard I have to stop you there now by that time uh Gene Roddenberry had passed away and she said Gene stipulated that in the Federation, there is no money. And I just said, yeah. I mean, yeah. What, have CBDC or something? Yeah, that's exactly the kind of thing. You just say to yourself, so there's no human ingenuity.

There's no desire. There's no difference between people. This is ridiculous. There's no trade. There's no accumulation of wealth. There's no desire there's no difference between people this is ridiculous there's no trade there's no accumulation of wealth there's no private property she goes yeah you have no idea the headaches that this has given us because we have to have them resort to barter i was like this is the 23rd century and you're having them resort to barter this is insane she goes i know it's so stupid but it was the utopian vision of gene roddenberry. He thought, well, you know, if they put it in CBDC,

we're all going to be resorting to barter. You know, it's like, how many triples does it take for this? It's like somebody poisoned the quadrature of Kaylee. And that's the thing, you know, you get these and that's why the prisoner,

I think is so interesting because in the prisoner, uh, you know, and we often talk about the prisoner so much. The prisoner is it's not a drama per se. It's a larger set piece for larger political, social and religious commentary, because Patrick McGowan is very staunch Catholic. And I know that you mentioned that last episode and i don't want to give any spoilers away but when i yeah when i first saw the show i didn't like that last episode but now that i've gone back and i see the way that the last episode works i realize it's a really great commentary on the human condition on ourselves on, and

I'm not going to say anything else. I'll have to go back and look at it again because I was one of those people who was like, I don't really like, cause what I liked about all of the other episodes, there's 17 episodes. So I liked about the other 16 was that it worked on several different levels. You know, it worked on an abstract level, the comments about, you know, the human condition and things like that, but it also typically would, there were some minor exceptions, but it would typically hold together as, um, you know, kind of a, an action adventure thing

as well. And so you could view it just as that, or you could understand the other additional facets to it. That's one of the things that I like so much about the, uh, you know, so many of the episodes in the prisoner. And that, that was the thing that I thought was kind of, kind of missing from the last one.

It was very, very abstract. Uh, but, um, yeah, we really are turning into, uh,

the village, aren't we? I mean, you look at these 15 minute cities, uh, this is getting even tighter and tighter than, uh, Neom where he's talking

about, uh, you know, be able to travel from one end of the line to the other end of the line linear city in 30 minutes or whatever, while they don't want you even traveling that far. They want to keep you confined in this little tiny village. Um, you know, you know, 15 minutes, everything is within 15 minutes. And I guess that is. Simply maybe walking or writing in a golf cart, you know, just like, everything is within 15 minutes. And I guess that is simply maybe walking or riding in a golf cart, you know, just like the village.

Yeah. And you know, David, I hope with the change over in the year that people don't either get fatigued or that they start to look at other things, because there's always some new attack that they're going to be bringing up. But if you look at those 15 minute cities, cities, over the past year, I don't know how many pieces I've written for MRCTV about various governors, whether it's the governor of New Jersey or it's another governor of Massachusetts, New York, saying by 2035, by 2050, by 2045, you won't be able to heat your home with natural gas or oil. You're going to have to do it with electricity. Well, who's going to control the grid? 2045, you won't be able to heat your home with natural gas or oil.

You're going to have to do it with electricity. Well, who's going to control the grid? Already we know exactly. The village will control the grid. The grid, yeah. And, you know, I thought about you. You mentioned earlier you played and discussed that RFK Jr. statement about how they're strip mining everything.

Yes. Strip mining. and he's terrific the way and you know he and i don't agree on everything but there are so many areas you look at a guy like russell brand i think he's starting to recognize the importance of individual liberty a lot more now and and forced collectivism is a big mistake uh you know a lot of my leftist friends would would be they would rail against authority, but then they would in the next breath say, but we need a security net. Well, it's like, well, who's going to run the security net? And now you're creating the same problem. And this is where I think if we look at some of the things that I've been reporting on over the past year, I hope people won't drop these things because they are really, really going to try to eliminate personal choice as much as possible and use all of these excuses about the environment and so on. in the generations behind me looking at things like the climate arguments and things like that

and they're not exactly um translatable but you're you being a little bit older than i am as you saw star trek i i was i was always very curious about this i saw star trek just as entertainment i didn't think about uhura and sulu being different races and Chekhov being the Russian who was there or whatever. They were just people. They were just people on this ship. Maybe a little bit of Chekhov because he was Russian and we still had the Soviet thing going on when I was a kid. And the Eastern Bloc Iron Curtain difference between them in the west but i i often have thought how much would a person who was a little bit older at that time have seen the propagandistic manipulation

going on in a show like star trek to try to push a particular message and maybe it was a a good message maybe part of their message of having everybody working together was a particular message and maybe it was a a good message maybe part of their message of having everybody working together was a good message that's right and then i think to myself how much are younger people getting acclimated to things like caring about the climate when their supposed care about the climate is not really care about the climate it's buying into government control caring about the climate means property rights and not hurting somebody else's property so um there's a there's a lot to consider there and i always wondered about that about somebody like like you who saw star trek and i guess you already

sort of gave reference to like you could kind of see some of the things that they were sort of pushing at that time right yeah it was kind of you know the diversity inclusion inclusivity type of thing as much as they could uh and it was uh forced uh obviously uh to to to push some of these things through as you point out they they were trying to make it into a little united nations type of deal and so that was uh that was there but you know you had um pull in like vulcans and things like that as well. So, you know, it was, it was, um, uh, it was, it was interesting, but it was also kind of obvious, you know, what, where, where they were going with it. As you point out, you know, he's got a UN mindset, he's got anti money mindset.

Uh, it's a very different kind of mindset than let's say, you know, last the Mohicans, you know, where you're looking at something that is very fundamentally about liberty and anti-authoritarianism. I mean, there's a lot of appeal to authority, even though they were constantly kind of doing their own thing and breaking outside of that. There was a very rigid society that was kind of imposed. And a lot of people made that analogy talking about how Star Wars, you had a rebel alliance that was pushing back against this massive structure that had become oppressive. And so it was a very different take between Star Trek and Star Wars in terms of looking at the individual, I think, in many different ways. Yeah, you know, I think a lot about how on a television show like that,

ideas often would get watered down because you have the team there and you've got executive producers and how fiction and my fiction, and I'm hoping to start getting that out very soon. I'm actually, because I've been given the rights back for my novels cause they got delayed by COVID and the publishing company said, okay, you know, take these back. And in fact, David, um, I published my first novella was published over in the UK in 2013. And I wrote a sequel for that, which was like 400 pages, is just bizarre the novella is 60 and the sequel is 440 pages yeah and um so kind of like the hobbit versus lord of the rings i guess yeah yeah exactly what is what genre are they are they science fiction or something like that yeah the the first one is called bite and it's's a sort of play on horror.

It was inspired by the original Kolchak, The Night Stalker, with Darren McAvin. And I always thought, we're all turning into Kolchaks now. We're all reporting on the bad guys. Nobody believes us. And his classic line, try to tell yourself, it couldn't happen here. You know? Yeah. And so it's about a guy who's a vampire killer well he he works in a weird field he gets paid by insurance companies and small governments to kill vampires because

they're a liability and he's getting into his mid-50s his eyesight is kind of going bad and and now they're paid to shut down uh people on uh podcasts and yeah and social yeah and you know you know it's interesting because i originally wrote it as a metaphor to my getting tired of having to defend constantly defend liberty i was going to just get out of it and just work on fiction because i when i after i finished off out in los angeles at star trek i came back here and i started to do talk radio i was closer to my parents wanted to be closer to them and um in working in talk radio um it was just it was very intense obviously um and so i thought maybe i want to go back to the script writing so i i couldn't sell scripts i couldn't just pitch

story ideas so i decided to work on prose fiction and that's where i developed this story bite and the funny thing is that i got a contract offer from a publishing company for the sequel and they actually wanted me to change my name on my political stuff or on my writing on my fiction one or the other and they said well you know you were expecting that you're going to be changing essentially i'm paraphrasing but they said so when when do you think you'll change your, one of your names? I was like, um, I'm not going to do that. So I declined the contract and then that book still has not been published. It's been like seven years. So what I'm thinking of doing is starting a Liberty conspiracy publishing outlet. I know a lot of other pro Liberty people, it might take some

fundraising. I don't know, you know, how, how we'll do it exactly. But, uh, um, just to try to get, get some of these pro-liberty books out there, um, would be kind of nice. And I know a lot of other folks who are pro-freedom and they have short story ideas and things like that. So we'll see how it all goes, but, uh, yeah, you know, uh, right now it's, it's, it's still, I decided I'd get back into fighting for freedom and I'm really glad I did, you know? Well, that's good. We certainly need you in the, in the fight. And, uh, you have been a very well informed and articulate warrior. And so, uh, you're very, very needed at this point in time.

I mean, it, it, it truly is amazing, but you know, you can, you can hit for the same thing, uh, from another, a number of different angles, right. As, as I was talking about before, you know, fiction is so powerful. And especially when you're looking at film and video, uh, the emotional aspect that, that can be brought into that can really grab ahold of people and, and you can show them a dystopian, uh, vision of the future. That's going to really hit home. And, and so they don't want to have this happen. I mean,

Hollywood does it all the time with predictive programming and we reference all these different things such as the village or brave new world or 1984 all the time. Um, you know, we reference it as something you don't want, but of course it's all these things have kind of become plans for them. It's the way they reenact.

Uh, and you know, David, I feel like I owe it to people to not give up trying to get information out there in both nonfiction and fiction. I owe it to some of the fiction writers who tried to impart these ideas in the past, and I owe it to people like you who are working for freedom. And there's a nice, and it's already been growing, but it's growing by leaps and bounds now with the lockdowns, of Christian writers, pro-freedom writers. You look at what you played with Kevin Sorbo doing the narration on the procedure. And yes, so many terrific folks who get involved with putting out quality fiction that can be valuable to people. And one of the things that I think I understand now more as an adult than I did as a younger person is when I was a younger person, I just liked diving into the story, the suspension of disbelief.

And that's what I liked. You know, I would watch TV. We would record it on audio cause we didn't have video recorders. I would listen to twilight zones or doctor who, or, you know, whatever it was over and over again. And, um, yeah, and it was fun, you know, you watch movies and it's terrific. Um, now that I'm older, I'm starting to recognize that the value of fiction is not just in the suspension of disbelief. As we mentioned, we are made in the image of God. So having the ability to imagine, I think, is something that C.S. Lewis and Tolkien tried to stress. They tried to get people to understand that if you can imagine this world

in your mind it's fiction recognize that you have the capacity you have the ability to see in this world what has been hiding here the whole time that you haven't recognized yet which is christ it's god everything was created right so I think that as I got gotten older now I'm starting to recognize that as I read something I don't just it's it's a tough balance I don't just want to suspend disbelief I want to come out of that suspension of disbelief, closing that page on that book or that chapter, recognizing that that was a message from someone, from a person, and respecting that person. um er edison or i watch a twilight zone episode i think about the the man or the woman you know and um and how they've made a connection to me so hopefully i'll be able to do that in in my fiction work and and hopefully doing this show i'll be able to sort of combine the uh contemporary

stories with uh you know some of the fiction stuff and and hopefully people will appreciate that it's going to be it's going to be interesting. Um, you know, I contemplated whether I was going to do this because as you know, I've been pretty sick and, um, I thought, you know, uh, and I was actually inspired by, by how hard you all worked when you started a couple of years ago. Yeah. That was amazing. You know, working by candlelight. Yeah. Yeah. Well, we do what we have to, you know, I mean, it just, it just comes up that way. Um, and, uh, yeah, it, it is, it is harder doing an open show. I have a comment here from a Brian Hanson. He had a tip.

He said, thank you for not spending a third of the broadcast on plugging. I've been listening since day one on info wars, you and Harrison Smith bring a different vibe. I love it. But you know, the, the thing is, is that, you know love it. But the thing is that plugging for a third of the show, that's kind of driven by being on radio. That's just kind of the format of it. And it gives you a little bit of a breathing room, time to prepare.

And I didn't have to prepare everything in advance like I have to do for a podcast. So a podcast is a lot of preparation, and it's a lot of work. And, um, you know, one of the reasons that we haven't gone to a radio format is, uh, you know, we would have a rigid time clock and we would have to leave space there for, for commercials. And one of the reasons we haven't done that is simply because, um, I don't want to, you know, cut out a third of the content. I don't have enough time to get through all the stuff that I've gone through on a daily basis anyway.

And, uh, so, you know, that's, uh, that's kind of where we are that, but I appreciate that Brian. Thank you. Um, you know, you were talking about, um, information you, you began talking about in the beginning, there was information you're talking about, um, uh, the, the minds behind these creative things, uh, kind of tying the beginning of that to the end. That is one of the things, isn't it? That is, as you mentioned, how we're created in the image of God,

the intelligence that is there. And that's what Werner was talking about in his book, the fact that you can see the intelligence there, that what is not tangible, in many cases, the structuring, the understanding of this the information that is on a um uh you know some kind of a computer drive or a card or something that the card is kind of immaterial and you can put a tremendous amount of important information on it doesn't change the mass in any perceptible way but in fact it changes everything and i think

that is the essence of being in the image of God, this creativeness that is there, whether you're talking about writing or whether you're talking about writing stories or writing music or whatever. That creativeness that is there is the thing that separates us from the animals. But we can see also the common designer in all of that. And that's what he was getting at. Yeah. Yeah. And I think that, uh, you know, in a microcosm, if you look at, um, being able to recognize it as you are reading something and hopefully it doesn't pull someone away from enjoying the story. Um, but being able to recognize that there is a mind behind the story that

you're reading, just like there's a mind behind the life that you're living. Uh, that's really important to me. And hopefully it's not boring to people, you know? Yeah. And, you know, it's also strange, David, because the fight is so intense right now. There are, as you know, you know, there's so much to research. There's so much information to cover.

And, you know, I try to translate it back to philosophical stuff that i've covered with students and i'm going to try to put that into the show as well um i try to do that over at the substax site and and i think about the attacks of the people who have been misled the people who think that force and aggression are the ways to change people's hearts the ways to make life better and um to improve people and uh i'm and we need to be careful that we don't fall into that on the right you know we've got things things that we feel uh very are very important we try to use government to force that on people as well if we're not careful careful so tonight uh what's the name of the program tonight six to seven three yeah yeah i've decided to use the liberty conspiracy name uh and i'm gonna have the liberty

conspiracy show to be on rockfin every monday through friday i i i hope uh tonight will be our first test at six o'clock uh six to seven thirty uh pm and then uh yeah and then hopefully on youtube in a couple weeks we'll start the former Star Trek writing fellow I'll give that a shot and people want to follow me on Twitter it's at guard goldsmith on Twitter and I'll update

people there of course it's sporadic so maybe the best thing is to go over to sub stack and do the Gardner Goldsmith sub stack just you know sign up and subscribe and you'll get the emails. And David, I'm curious to see what you think. Maybe sometime we can talk about this because I like Substack. I like it a lot, but I wonder, there's so many people on Substack

and I wonder whether people are going to get lost in the mix unless they already have a big name. So I really want to thank you. I don't know, I put a few things up there and I need to put some more up and I've come up, I say, oh, I've got to do an article about this and then I get busy because we've got to get the show out. You know, after the show finishes, we've got to do things like, you know, cut up some excerpts from it and, you know, put it down on social media.

So I haven't done as much as I'd like to do a sub stack, but yeah, it is something that I think, um, uh, there's a lot of potential there. Uh, at least they're committed to a free speech. That's a big deal you know big time absolutely absolutely and uh they're not like number two squelching our speech you know uh who is number one but um yeah and and that's one of the things i just i just want to mention with intense vigor uh how uh how enlightening you've been for me and how how much energy you've given me oh and to all the people who watch you and who are in the chat you know the knights of the storm angry tiger

jason ronda and i want to get them on as well i want to get them yeah you've done nights of the storm and and i want to get them on and talk to them as well so yes yeah i love those guys so it's going to be it's going to be pretty intense, but I think with the support, really, it's because of you that I think I can start this. And I think I'm going to be able to do it. I think you can, absolutely. You've got a lot of content, a lot of ideas,

and you've got a lot of things happening all at once, a lot of energy. So hats off to you, Garth. Again, tonight, 6 o'clock, Liberty Conspiracy on Rockfin. So hats off to you, Gard. Again, tonight 6 o'clock Liberty Conspiracy on Rockfin. Tune in for the first show. Thank you, Gard. Have a good night. Thank you, David. Be seeing you.

Be seeing you. That's right. The Common man. They created common core and dumbed down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you.