The David Knight Show - 5Jan23 Pfizer's Rap Sheet of Crime, Corruption, RICO Convictions

Episode Date: January 5, 2023

Deep dive today on the foundations of the 2 key issues before us- Medical Dictatorship and Eco-dictatorship: Criminal convictions, blackmail, bribery, RICO conviction of Pfizer and the corruption of their government partners in FDA other agencies55 years of false prophecies and alarmism from climate "scientists" and media as 60 Minutes continues to push Paul Ehrlich, who has been wrong about EVERYTHING for 60 YEARS, not merely 60 MinutesTony Arterburn joins at the midpoint to talk economy, gold, CBDC and war on cryptoFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 5th of January, year of our Lord, 2023, day 1029. And so the question is, as everybody is starting to see the massive corruption, the mass murder and damage, and we've got a long list

of the criminal background, the rap sheet goes on for dozens of pages, the rap sheet for Pfizer. And I'm not talking about things that, well, look, they said this. No, these are actual convictions, fines. They admitted their guilt. We're going to talk about that. And we're going to talk about the massive fraud that has been going on for over 50 years on climate,

because climate is at the basis of the next step. So we have to look backwards and say, what are we going to do not only to stop this, but to bring these people to justice? And then what are we going to do to stop this lying narrative that is being used to destroy the world and take everything from us? It is the climate lie that is foundational to the Great Reset. We'll be right back. I'm going to begin this segment and end this segment about what is happening with the, what should we call it now?

We call it the plannedemic. We call it the plannedemicide. Call it COVID-9-11. What do we call this thing, this scam, this MacGuffin? But I'm going to begin and end with dead bodies. There's a funeral home operator that has been jailed now for selling body parts. 500 plus victims. The families thought that they were paying for a funeral

and a cremation. But instead, this Colorado-based funeral home was selling off body parts to medical facilities without the family's knowledge or permission. They have been sentenced to 20 years. The funeral home director has been sentenced to 20 years in prison. A lot of different charges. Again, it was 500. Student loan payments are on pause.

I don't know what that was, but anyway, they have been sentenced to jail. 20 years. Now, this is heinous, but it is not nearly as heinous as what Fauci and the NIH and the FDA and Planned Parenthood and the University of Pittsburgh and many of these others have done to living babies. These are dead bodies that they mutilated and sold off for money. Fauci and these other people have been working with Planned Parenthood and the people who tried to expose us, what's happening to them? Well, Lala Harris, when she was Attorney general came after David Delight in the center for

medical progress, I said, you weren't allowed to expose our crimes. And then the process, you know, she got promoted to a Senator then to vice president, the guy who took her place, Javier Becerra,

who is now promoted to head of HHS, continued the persecution. And now there's somebody else still continuing the case. And by continuing that case, it exposed who the customers were for this heinous body part trafficking from live babies. We're not talking about dead corpses. heinous body part trafficking from live babies. We're not talking about dead corpses. And nothing is happening to them.

As a matter of fact, they get promoted. They get massive sums of money. This is the evil satanic government that is over us. There's no other way to see this thing. And what do they do with the parts? That's the other thing. They use it for their transhumanist experiments. Oh yeah, we're going to create humanized mice so that we can supposedly test some of these new drugs on them.

Why bother to create transhumanized mice when you don't do the tests anyway? So there's a very long thread uh and uh from kanekoa substack k-a-n-e-k-o-a substack i would recommend this to you i'm going to go through the list here, the long rap sheet of Pfizer. As this person points out, and they've got documentation going back decades, crimes and convictions of Pfizer for decades. Pfizer has habitually engaged in illegal and corrupt marketing practices. They have bribed physicians. They have suppressed adverse trial results. Well, that's, I don't know, that's their summary at the beginning. When you go through this, you'll see they have also

bribed and blackmailed government officials. And one of the things that's not in this sub stack is something that I talked about a great deal, how Brazil and Argentina talked in a third unnamed country who succumbed to Pfizer's bribery. They were blackmailed by Pfizer. And the leverage that Pfizer had was, of course, this global conspiracy to not allow any travel into or out of a country unless the people were vaccinated. So we're going to seal off your entire country from the world if you don't do what we say. And I'm demanding that you hold me harmless on a long list of fraudulent, negligent activities. And I want the assets, I want it as backup and guarantee of this,

I want you to back this up with assets outside of your country that we can get to. That was absolutely amazing. And it was reported by a pharmaceutical trade publication, Stat News. And that was about a year and a half, two years ago, they reported that. Now, what does that tell you? Several things. It tells you that Pfizer is a criminal organization. They have been, juries have found them guilty of racketeering, influence corrupt organizations, RICO statutes. This is not my opinion.

This is not my opinion. This is not slander. This is a fact that has been found out by a jury. And that's in just one case. But when they're trying to do that, and the reason I talked about that so much, a year and a half, two years ago, was because I said, do you understand why they are so adamant that they be held harmless in so many different ways? Because they know what they're doing.

And they know how lethal this stuff is. They know people are going to die. They know people are going to have adverse effects. And they're covering themselves in advance. And they're doing this in collusion with the World Health Organization and the UN and the World Economic Forum and all the rest of these people who are, by de facto, we already have a world government, folks. It's world governance by these organizations. And their ties are getting tighter.

They're all tied together. And they've tied the knot and they're cinching it down and unifying it as we go along. But let's go back to the Pfizer files here. As I said, all these things are no secret, yet it is brushed under the rug by politicians and media.

And why would that be? Well you know they're yeah they're all brought to you by pfizer yeah now you get the idea i could go on and on and on. That's a very long clip. You notice one of those was Anderson Cooper. Anderson Cooper said after one of these massive judgments against Pfizer, several billion dollars, the biggest at that point in time that had ever been done, there's going to be a much, much bigger judgment against Pfizer coming up. The wheels of justice turn very, very slowly, but they will grind very finely. And if it doesn't

happen in this life, it'll be even worse for them in the next. But justice will be done. The truth will come out. Anderson Cooper, after that big judgment, said, if they can swallow a multi-billion dollar judgment like this and just slough it off and keep operating, what else can they do? Can we trust any of the products that come out of them? It's a rhetorical question. Of course, the answer is no. But did that have any implications for anderson cooper

cheering the vaccine along no because he's brought to you by pfizer i could be brought to you by pfizer they did it for on the podcast they did it for about two weeks when we first um started putting some ads on the podcast i i could i what I make if I just did nothing but ads and cheered the vaccine companies and pushed the government line. It's probably too late for me to do that. I wouldn't do it anyway, but it's ridiculous the amount of money that is out there. I mean, we're talking about trillions of dollars. We're talking about the biggest ad campaign that the Ad Council has ever seen put in by Trump.

That's why I said they went from warp speed to warp drive. Let's drive everybody to get the vaccines. Anyway, let's talk about the rap sheet here. This is the list. It's in this substack, K-A-N-E--k-o-a dot substack.com uh push it around 1994 Pfizer paid the Justice Department to settle claims that the company lied to get federal approval for a heart valve then covered up safety concerns even as the device killed hundreds of patients hundreds we're talking about many millions of people.

Now Pfizer paid $200 million to settle lawsuits. In 1996, Pfizer gave an experimental drug to 200 Nigerian children without informing their parents that an approved cure existed or that their children were subjects of a medical experiment. That kind of stuff is happening now with schools, with transgender stuff. They make your child a subject of a psychological experiment as well as a medical experiment. If you don't catch it, they will give them chemicals or push them for surgery and they

don't tell the parents. Anyway, 11 children died in that one. Others suffered brain damage, organ failures, paralysis. So that was 1996. Five years later, Pfizer was sued on behalf of 30 Nigerian families who alleged that their children were used as human guinea pigs. They claimed Pfizer violated the Nuremberg Code. Sound familiar? Expose their children to cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment.

Well, of course, they did violate the Nuremberg Code because the Nuremberg Code would say that you can't expose these people to dangerous things without their consent. A minor cannot give consent. So if you don't tell the parents, there's absolutely no way that you have informed consent. And it is clearly a violation of the Nuremberg Code. So what happened? The case was dismissed.

Because we're talking about a corrupt, satanic, American federal government. That was reported by the Washington Post. In 2007, the Nigerian government is still coming after them. Remember, this is now 11 years old. They sued Pfizer for $7 billion and accused them of carrying out illegal trials that killed or disabled children. And that, of course, was reported by mainstream media. If you look at this sub stack, you'll see all the headlines that have been collected in this. In 2010, leaked State Department cables.

Now, this is still the Nigerian thing, right? So 1996, they do it then the parents come after them the feds just throw it out so the parents go to the nigerian government the nigerian government comes back and says we're going to sue you for seven billion dollars of these illegal tests on children that's big that's much bigger than the subsequent judgment against pfizer by the u.s, which was a record-breaking one that Anderson Cooper was talking about. So $7 billion. So they get serious. Pfizer does. So that happens in 2007. By 2010, we see leaked State Department cables that allege that Pfizer had hired investigators

to blackmail Nigeria's attorney general and to dropping the $7 billion lawsuit against Pfizer. That was reported by The Guardian. The leaked cables claimed that Pfizer passed, quote, a series of damaging articles to the media that accused the attorney general of corruption and warned him that more negative articles would come out if he didn't drop the case so they investigate and they find that this guy is uh you know they got something on him now this is one of the reasons why we see so much sexual corruption in washington of course

at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses

on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet this is total betting sign up by 2pm 14th of March bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials

and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18plusgamblingcare.ie and even to the extent Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. And even to the extent that you have the longest serving Speaker of the House for the Republicans was a wrestling coach. They knew he was a pedophile. They got him in Congress.

They pushed him in. Got him to be Speaker of the House. Dennis Astrid. And I'll never forget. I don't think Rush knew it. I don't think Rush would condone that. I think he just didn't know, and he became a partisan cheerleader. That's what happens when you become a partisan cheerleader,

when you lose your skepticism. But he had had Dennis Hastert on, and the two of them were talking about how that congressional page scandal had happened, and that, oh, this is just pure politics. There's nothing really here. Well, there really was. But Dennis Hastert was on with Rush Limbaugh, and they were telling everybody there's nothing there.

It's just pure politics. Then a few years later, uh, you know, similar things happened. And, uh, and it was pure politics allegations about Dennis Hastert.

It was pure politics. Then you find out that he's being blackmailed by one of the people that, uh, he used, but Dennis Hastert was controllable. Yeah. That's why they put people like that in that position so you have to wonder what is in kevin mccarthy's background by the way you know when you look at this whole kevin i'm not going to get into this thing but i thought this was

interesting somebody sent this to me it's a picture they said why does world economic forum have kevin mccarthy on as speaker of the house well if you look at it they have him listed as majority leader of the u.s house of representatives look at it, they have him listed as Majority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, and this is on the World Economic Forum site, Davos. My question is, why is he there? They don't have, they have not made him Speaker. Majority Leader, he is Majority Leader, but he's not Speaker of the House. You don't even have to be a congressional, you don't even have to be a member of Congress to be Speaker of the House. Anybody could be Speaker of the house. Now you don't even have to be a congressional, um, uh, you don't even have to

be a member of Congress to be speaker of the house. Anybody could be speaker of the houses. People were saying, let's make Trump speaker of the house, that type of thing. Uh, but the question is why is McCarthy there on the world economic forum? What are his connections with him? I don't know. I don't know, but that is a troubling anyway. That's as far as I'm going. That's all I've got to say about this whole, um, GOP McCarthy political theater thing. I don't know, but that is a troubling. Anyway, that's as far as I'm going. That's all I've got to say about this whole GOP McCarthy political theater thing. I don't really care. Frankly, it doesn't even matter who the congressmen are. The people running our government are the bureaucracy.

Haven't you realized that yet? You talk about gun control. That's being done now on autopilot by the ATF. They don't even need Congress for that. But take a look at what happened under the COVID-9-11 regime. Under the planned democide. This country was run by Fauci and by a bunch of other state and local public health bureaucrats. And we're still under that regime, technically.

They've eased off wisely so that we think that we're free well you're not free they laid their foundation there they set their precedents there and you're not free the worst thing is most people don't understand it but going back to this so that works that works when they blackmail the Nigerian attorney general Pfizer did and we found this from leaked State Department cables. And I wonder if those were published on Wikipedia. I'm sorry, not Wikipedia, WikiLeaks. No.

Anyway, I did not do the research to find out if that was the case. Nigeria then dropped the case. In 2002, Pfizer agreed to pay $49 million to settle allegations that the drug company defrauded the federal government and 40 states by charging too much for its cholesterol treatment Lipitor. This was reported by the New York Times. In 2008, the New York Times also published an article entitled,

Experts Conclude Pfizer Manipulated Studies. 2008. This is not the vaccine, of course, but this is their MO. It's a pattern of behavior. A pattern of criminal behavior. Pfizer delayed the publication of negative studies. They spun negative data more positively. They suppressed negative findings to promote a drug called Neurontin.

And, you know, again, another expose by the New York Times, which had no problem telling everybody, oh, look, you know, this COVID-9-11 vaccine, the genetic code injection, perfectly safe and 100% effective. Yeah. After this history that the New York Times had. Who got paid off there? Seriously, who got paid off?

How could you report on these people for decades and just talk about how they've rigged studies and spun the data and hidden data and blackmailed government officials and then say, oh yeah, I'll just take it on face value, whatever they had to say. In 2019, Pfizer paid $750 million to settle 35,000 claims that its drug Resilin was responsible. This is for diabetes. Resilin was responsible for 63 deaths and dozens of liver failure. But the FDA did not remove the drug from the market until three years after the UK had. And people continued to die that entire time, of course. In 2009, Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion, at that time, the largest health care fraud settlement. And remember, that was happening at exactly the same time that this Nigerian case came up. That was 11 years after the fact that it began.

And they got it dismissed in 2009 by blackmailing the Nigerian attorney general. He was looking for $7 billion. But Pfizer was fined by the U.S. government. It's $2.3 billion. The largest healthcare fraud settlement, largest criminal fine ever imposed in the U.S. Pfizer is a criminal organization. You understand?

The U.S. government says that, not David Knight, but I'll repeat it over and over again. That's their findings. Pfizer pled guilty to paying kickbacks to doctors and illegally promoting Bextra. Bextra, Bextra, read all about it. Geodon, Zyvox, and Lyrica. I hate these drug names.

And that's where I said, you know, Anderson Cooper said, if Pfizer is too big to fail, and even if the biggest fine in history is just a few months' profits, then what's going to stop it from illegally promoting other jobs? And yet, I'll play that for you. Anderson Cooper, 360 Anderson Cooper Cooper brought to you by Pfizer. Yeah, what's going to stop it? Nothing. Because not only can they swallow, was Anderson Cooper just negotiating for a higher price when he said that?

That's what Trump did, you know. Trump brought in RFK Jr. Oh, let's talk about vaccines and made a display of it. And immediately, you know, there's a lot of alarm in the pharmaceutical industry. A massive donation made to Trump. And then they get the CEO of Eli Lilly put in, Alex Azar, as head of HHS. It works. Probably worked the same way for Anderson Cooper.

Well, you know, Anderson, that was pretty strong what you had to say, but, well, you know, I need a sponsor. You don't think that stuff happens? You'd be naive to think that it doesn't happen. In 2010, Pfizer was ordered to pay $142 million, chump change, for damages and violating federal anti-racketeering laws with its fraudulent sale and marketing of Neurontin. The jury found that Pfizer violated the RICO Act.

This is for the mafia. This is for the mafia. This is for organized crime. Pfizer is an international drug cartel, organized criminals. They ought to use, you know, the drug laws out there, where they went in and they took everything from El Chapo and the Sinaloa drug cartel before the trial, right? Now, if they're found guilty of the RICO Act, why didn't the government just come in and take everything from them? Good question, I think. Anyway, again, nothing in this thread about how within this latest scam,

this latest crime scheme that pfizer has nothing about how they didn't just blackmail the attorney general of a country but they blackmailed entire countries brazil argentina went public about it contacted the pharmaceutical press only two organizations that i could see reported that but they were solid. Stat News is just, they're just an observer of pharmaceutical news. They don't have an opinion. They're not criticizing anything that's being done by anybody. They didn't take an editorial position on it whatsoever. They just said, well, this is what's being said by Argentina and Brazil.

They didn't point out that Pfizer is a criminal drug cartel racketeering organization. But it was a third country that said, I don't want to even talk about it. We've got an agreement and we're going to buy their drug and we're going to indemnify them against all harm, all fraud, all negligence, all maliciousness. And that way we'll be able to come and go in and out of our country. And 2010 blue cross filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, accusing them of bribing 5,000 doctors with lavish Caribbean vacations, golf games, cash payments, massages, massages, quote unquote, and other recreational.

Activities. Um, this is very similar to what we've seen with the opioids. massages, quote unquote, and other recreational activities. This is very similar to what we've seen with the opioid stuff, right? Because this is the way the industry operates. The pharmakia. We were told about this 2,000 years ago. They were told they'd be the greatest men on earth, the richest. They would not ever repent of their murders so or their thefts so this is blue cross big insurance company filed a lawsuit against them uh saying you know you're um you're paying drug doctors to prescribe drugs that um that you sell that are very expensive.

In 2012, the SEC charged Pfizer with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, bribing foreign healthcare professionals in Bulgaria, China, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Italy, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Serbia. Pfizer settled for only $60 million. Again, chump change. In 2012, Pfizer paid $1.2 billion to settle claims by nearly 10,000 women that its drug, Primpro, caused breast cancer. This included punitive damages because Pfizer withheld warnings, talking about the risk of breast cancer that they knew about, so they knew because

of that time they were doing tests. Unlike, uh, the, um, Trump shots. And as part of their tests, they understood that this increased breast cancer. They sold it anyway. They didn't tell anybody. In 2012, Pfizer paid $55 million to settle criminal charges for illegally promoting its proton pump inhibitor, Protonix. In 2016, they paid $784 million to settle a Medicare fraud case for the promotion of

pro tonics. So Medicaid came after them and you had a big payoff to the whistleblower as they recovered $784 million. A whistleblower gets a percentage of that. Uh, there were over, there are over 13,000 proton pump inhibitor lawsuits, lawsuits, 13,000 proton pump inhibitor lawsuits. Lawsuits.

13,000 lawsuits that are pending in federal court. They claim that Pfizer and other drug manufacturers withheld warning signs of kidney disease, acute interstitial nephritis, and kidney failure. All of those kidney related. In 2013, Pfizer paid $273 million to settle claims by over 2,000 people that its drug, Shantix, caused suicidal thoughts and severe psychological disorders. You know, they were just warming up, just warming up because the biggest thing, the biggest crime ever, biggest pharmaceutical crime ever, presided over by Donald,

funded, produced by Donald Trump, the father of the vaccine, directed by Fauci, and brought to you by Pfizer. As we look at this, and I'm skipping over a lot of this stuff, it just goes on and on and on. You get the idea, don't you, I think? So we look at what's going on with the COVID-19 genetic code injections. 84% of the Pfizer reports of these authors who looked at it and issued a report, oh, this is great. It's 100% safe, 100% effective.

84% of the people who wrote that had a conflict of interest, defined as they were either employed, they either owned stock, or they received grants from Pfizer. For example, two BioNTech founders, the two founders of BioNTech, their partner in this, gained more than $9 billion from the vaccine, and they co-authored the report. So this is the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The two guys who founded the company, BioNTech, co-authored this report. And no conflict of interest, right?

Oh, yeah, biggest you can imagine pfizer unblinded the trial and i've talked about this as well uh after two months which means they have absolutely no safety data uh it it ruined any long-term safety data So there's nothing that can be gleaned from this. Normally when you have, and I'll talk about that briefly, you have these phase one, two, three trials, and you have a different path if it's a therapeutic versus a vaccine. A therapeutic, you know, since before we rewrote all the dictionaries. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the the roar and the

chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care dot e right before we redefined what a woman is what a vaccine is and all the rest of this stuff under this insane marxist regime that has taken over the world before we started rewriting definitions of things like that a vaccine was supposedly something that prevented you from getting a disease.

A therapeutic was something that would cure or treat a disease. And so they had two different ways to test these things. And the test would take, you know, a decade or more. And that's why, you know, Fauci was conspiring with the people openly publicly in 2000 october 2019 saying how do we get past this thing we got to wait 10 years before we can start making money off of this stuff well we do it from the inside we do it with disruption and uh we do it iteratively right that's what they've done But when you have these two paths with a therapeutic, they're going to bring in people who, after they do some animal tests,

then they do a very, very small phase one test to see if it harms people. That's usually done with volunteers in prison or something like that because they're very dangerous. And if the prisoners don't drop dead, uh, they go to the next stage and they have a few people who have the condition, uh, and then they evaluate the safety over a longer period of time, the safety and the efficacy of that therapeutic to treat it. Then they repeat it with a larger group for phase three, same thing as phase two, but with a larger group. So the vaccines are very similar with a distinction that since vaccines don't cure anything, and

I know that's one of the things that's been redefined in people's minds, you know, you got to get the vaccine. It's going to cure it. No. And of course, now we know that it doesn't prevent it and they don't even try to admit that it prevents it. So they just changed the definition of a vaccine, but they were supposed to have two different groups and it was supposed to

last for a very long time because under the Nuremberg code, you could not expose people to something that you know is harmful. And so you're going to give a placebo to some of these people, and then you're going to expose them to a disease. In the case of COVID-9-11, it was going to be the most dangerous disease the world has ever seen because the world's never done anything like this in response to any disease. So we can't just expose these, give these people a placebo and expose them to this.

That would be unethical. So they just have two groups and nobody knows who it is. And you let these groups just mingle about in society for a very long period of time. And then you compare it to see if the people who got it got the disease at a much lower rate. And that's how you evaluate the efficacy. But they didn't do any of that. And they even exposed the test after just two months. They also, when you you look at the test they also did not look for things like the d-dimer test to see if there was micro clotting that was happening that's now been done after the fact uh they didn't look for troponins which would indicate that there's

heart damage for myocarditis pericarditis any of these things anytime you have a heart issue you can detect that by looking for troponins in the blood. They didn't look. They didn't look at the blood oxygen for hypoxia. They didn't look at amyloids for Alzheimer's. They didn't look at C-reactive protein for inflammation. Nothing. They didn't care. I see nothing. I see, I look at nothing. They saw no evil. They spoke no evil. And you heard no evil about any of this stuff. In 2021, Pfizer alone spent $2 billion on advertising across print, digital, and TV. Yeah, that's the whole thing, right? We saw that everywhere, everywhere, relentless. And of course, how much did they give to YouTube? How much did they give to quote-unquote influencers on YouTube?

They were getting paid massive amounts of money to do puff interviews with Fauci. One guy, Curtis Chang, is an Asian pastor from Duke University. He set up an entire business off of this stuff. And he brought in people like these Trump pastors, like Jeffrey's out of Dallas. And they would do these videos and push them out to other pastors to influence the people in their church to get the shot. It's not the mark of the beast and it's safe and it's effective and it's

science and it's a miracle. And you saw the same stuff being parroted by Franklin Graham, by Al Mohler and many, many, many, many others. It worked. It worked all that advertising. So, um, they took a hundred days to test it, quote unquote, but you can't do a test on 100 days, as I explained. And then they wanted to hide the data for 75 years.

100 days to run a faux test and then hide all that data for 75 years. Nine out of 10 of the FDA's commissioners. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet

up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee between 2006

and 2019 went on to work for the pharmaceutical companies that they were supposed to regulate that's a big revolving door isn't as a matter of fact trump had gottlieb go to pfizer and then the guy who replaced Gottlieb, Hahn, went to Moderna. You know, I've got, as we look at this, and we talk about all the damage that's been done to people, I saw this report. Olivia Pessonnier was part of Moderna's clinical trial. After two years of serious adverse reactions, she now has T-cell lymphoma and leukemia. Her adverse events were not reported to the FDA. And so what she did was she went into the doctor's office that had injected her

and who was supposed to have reported this she went into her office and she secretly recorded the video you can see it's a little bit canted the sound and the video quality is not precise but it's a you know the doctor doesn't realize that she's being recorded. And this is what was said. I'm so sorry. This is the doctor. Over two years, and some of the folks were older. Yeah, we did have people who had various things that went to the hospital for this and that.

But nothing like what you got through. I mean, I've been doing clinical trials for almost 25 years. I've done studies on drugs that didn't make it because they had big issues. It's not a perfect process. It's a market that we sometimes find out later when you give it to lots and lots of people that there's issues. It's not perfect. You are the one out of the 300. I don't know why.

That's not a big number. No. This study was like 20,000 people in this study with data that they have. This was never submitted to the FDA. My adverse reactions were never submitted to the FDA by Moderna. It wasn't in the report when they submitted it

for emergency use authorization. It wasn't there. I read it. The shoulder? Anything. Any of my... This doctor was a principal investigator of the trial by the way well yeah you don't always um you know i don't know how they write up their reports and stuff so you did report that adverse reaction oh yeah oh yeah i reported they don't always report them to the fda's what if we said they don't always do that well i don't know how they summarize the FDA. What if we said they don't always do that? Well, I don't know how they summarize things.

You know, like if they have 20,000 people and they have all these different things, like the dizziness or the neurologic may have been grouped under neurologic. It's just not easy to spot, I guess is what I'm saying. I'm not going to say anything about sort of, I mean, shoulder injuries, like sort of what's been in there at all. Do you imagine, like, having that and just feeling that way? It's a fortune. It's a complication of several vaccines, not just the COVID vaccine.

Yeah, they're all dangerous. Do you think that what is wrong with me, all of these health problems, is the result of the vaccine? I think your shoulder. Okay, you don't think the cancer i don't know and i'll be watching i'm open you know there's data that will come out that will show that there's problems just like with the jansen vaccine we did that study and i was like holy mackerel there's some real issues with that now we don't do that vaccine anymore but you pretend that there's no issues with this and you we don't have to do that vaccine anymore.

But you pretend that there's no issues with this. And you know, when you talk about T-cell lymphoma, we're all getting a medical education, aren't we? You know, it's kind of like once you are diagnosed with a particular disease, you start researching it because it is so important

to you. And our entire society has been inflicted with a disease of corruption and a democide injection. To kill, to sterilize, a depopulation injection. The Trump bioweapon. That's what I should call it, not the Trump shots. I should call it the Trump bioweapon. Really piss off the MAGA people because I'm pissed off.

How can you look at this stuff, these crimes, and not be angered by it? So what do we do? You know, there's a LifeSite news article. All right, we need to have Nuremberg 2.0. And they had a list of 50 questions, which I'm not going to go into detail. They're all questions that we've talked about. But they don't have anything there about how do we start this. And, of course, there have been some hearings in Germany and America and other places where doctors have come together, laid out all this information.

Those doctors were silenced off of social media. The press attacked them. Their medical establishment attacked them. They didn't get any traction on this. What do we need to do? We do need to have that. The question is, how do we accomplish that? How do we get that?

Can we find any honest politicians, any honest media. Even when you have a player who essentially has a heart attack in front of everybody on Monday Night Football. And let me say this as well. Be careful of what you put out. This has been sent to me by several people. I'm not criticizing. Please send me stuff. I need to evaluate it to see whether or not it is

true. But this was put out. And you see this picture, Dr. Benjamin Edelman. He said, I recently administered Daymar Hamlin's COVID booster on 12-26. And as a medical professional, I can assure the public that he passed all screenings with flying colors. I'm in contact with the UCMC staff and will provide any assistance to them. And a person says, well, apparently he deleted this pretty quickly, but not before somebody got a screenshot of it. So this is going viral around. Let me tell you, it's not true. There is no doctor by that name.

First of all, you know, would a doctor put out that kind of information? Well, let me tell you what I've been doing with my patient. It's called doctor-patient privilege, right? You don't talk about what you do with your patients, number one. Number two, this guy looks like a movie star in his thumbnail. They did find one doctor who looked like a doctor. He's old. He's bald, but, uh, you don't know anything to do with any of this stuff.

That's why I was talking about Stu Peters. That's why I've talked about that many times. It's the thing that Stu Peters does is the thing that Alex Jones does. And this type of stuff here, where did that come from? I don't know where it came from. It could very well come from Pfizer or it could come from the deep state that was pushing these covid 9 11 injections to discredit it right they're very concerned this that was a big deal and so they immediately came out with people you you know, he, um, he was, uh, as soon as this happened, you had all these establishment doctors opining about, oh, what must've been

trauma to the chest that caused his heart attack. No, Dr. Peter McCullough explained, and there's other studies that were found by Alex Berenson looking at soccer, the people that, yeah, you can have a have a, if you've already got myocarditis, then you don't have to hit somebody in the chest at a microsecond timing in between beats to make that happen. And so the real issue is myocarditis, which has now become a household word. And they're very desperate to push this back.

That's why they had all those medical experts go all over social media. No, no, it has nothing to do with the vaccine. We're not going to even consider anything other than it was trauma to the chest. Nothing else will even be considered. We don't care. We don't care about him. We don't care about other athletes. We don't care about you sitting there on your couch watching him.

We're not going to investigate any of this stuff. That's how corrupt the media and the government and the pharmaceutical industry is. Don't care about it. And they will put out things like this shot here, you know, boosted thing. They'll put out stuff like that to discredit. See those? It's just those crazy conspiracy theorists out there. And whether intended to or not, that's exactly what Stu Peters has done a couple of times

now. Not his first rodeo doing that kind of thing. But that, I think, was that shot there about that doctor. I think that was there strictly to discredit people, to mislead people and discredit them. You put out an obviously easily debunked lie. It's a long, long tactic of the government and the intelligence agencies to do that. I've said that over and over again.

So where are we with this? Do we get a Nuremberg 2.0 trial? And if we do, who are we going to turn to to lead it? And that's the point that Brian Shulhavi had at Health Impact News or vaccineimpact.com. And he says, has Wall Street hijacked the vaccine resistance movement by funding pro-vaccine spokespeople to speak against the COVID vaccines. And in this, he has Dr. Peter McCullough, RFK Jr., Dr. Simone Gold, Dr. Joseph Latipo,

who is the Florida Surgeon General, and Steve Kirsch. Now, he goes on to say, and he says, look, I think these people made some very valuable contributions, and they have, and he's reported on them, and I've reported on them, and I've interviewed Steve Kirsch. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival,

we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee and so he said but the problem that he has is that in general they see this and present this covid disaster as an outlier for vaccines and they and through this article that Brian has, he talks about how over and over again, these people, even RFK Jr., will not oppose vaccines,

but just talk about specifics. Well, if we could only get the mercury out, or if we could only get the formaldehyde out, or if we could only this or that, right? Oh, it'd be a great thing to do that. The vaccines are harmful, categorically harmful. I categorically oppose vaccines. I categorically recommend that you get no vaccines and that you give no vaccines to

your kids. And I can say that from experience in our family. And don't wait until you're injured to find out about this stuff. Now, go back to autism. Are these, you know, RFK Jr. has talked about autism, but he's focused on the additives to it, not attacking the vaccine industry specifically. He says, so, and the point that he did with this is not to discredit these people.

He said, I have reported their information and I will continue to report it. I think Dr. McCullough did an excellent job of explaining what the real issue was with this NFL player on Monday Night Football. So again, whenever we look at things like this, we have to always be critical of the information. And this is not to be critical of the people. This is to critically consume the information and to also look at conflicts of interest.

Do you want the Pfizer report that came out? Do you want to be co-authored by the guys who run the company that's selling it? And do you want 84% of the people who reviewed it and contributed to it? Do you want them to all be financially gaining from this type of thing? Of course you don't. And when it comes to stopping this, all of these people listed on there have made very valuable contributions and i'm not demonizing them and neither is brian in his article but the point is is that it's a bigger problem than just the covid 9- Trump shots, bioweapons, and that type of thing.

It's a bigger issue than that. I have just spent 45 minutes talking to you about the history of Pfizer. It's a much bigger issue than just this last thing. These people are criminal drug cartels. They're as bad as any Mexican drug cartel. They're perhaps worse because the drug cartel will chop people's heads off and hang them from a bridge. These people will silently kill you.

They're the worst kind of murderers. They're poisoners who do it on the sly. So who do we on the sly. So who do we look for for guidance in the future as we seek to heal those who have suffered from these bioweapons and seek justice for the criminals who did this? This is the number one question that has to be answered in 2023 as we move forward. That and what I'm going to be talking about, which is, you know,

to deconstruct, it's easy to deconstruct this climate fraud as well. But anyway, he says, well, there are whistleblowers and doctors and others who have done a great job in exposing the problem. It is now time to move beyond the fact that we have a criminal problem with criminal products that are killing people. And it's time to focus on bringing these criminals to justice and bringing down this entire criminal enterprise. That's going to be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for those who still support the system and earn their living from the criminal system. Let me tell you what it's going to require. It's going to require somebody with a moral integrity of someone like William Wilberforce. William Wilberforce was someone who was very wealthy, very privileged.

He was already in parliament and became a Christian. And he went to Newton who wrote Amazing Grace and talked to him about getting out of parliament and becoming a pastor. He said, God put you there. For the rest of his life, he opposed this stuff. And it was the biggest criminal enterprise of his day.

The slave trade was like the pharmaceutical trade of this day. They trafficked in lives. They didn't care who they hurt. As you see them purging statues everywhere. Anybody that has any kind of tangential thing. Oh, you know, they worked for a company. And this company sold stuff to one of these shipping companies that was involved in the slave trade. All right, so take their statue down, no matter what else they did. I mean, but it had tentacles that went throughout society.

That's why they're purging. They're using that to purge all of Western civilization. And it is a purge. I mean, there isn't anybody in the UK or in America that's holding up William Wilberforce as an example. They're just saying, well, this was pervasive. It ran throughout society. So we're going to destroy the foundations of this society that was built on the work of those people. Anything now is tainted that was touching that.

But he continued to push that, and it was a hopeless cause when he began. And it took his entire life to do it. But he did. First, he stopped the slave trade. Did you notice that William Cumberbatch is now being sued by one of these Caribbean islands? I can't remember which one it was now.

I don't have the article in front of me. But they're suing him for a massive amount of money, saying that his family owes them reparations because they were enslaved. So when they ended the slave trade, and then just before Wilberforce died, they freed the slaves. They paid the plantation owners for the slaves and then freed them in the Caribbean, the British government did. That was all the work of one man. I'm serious.

It was the work of one man. He tirelessly and relentlessly lobbied his fellow legislators, shamed them for what was being done, shamed them for standing by passively while this was happening. So, by the way, to free the slaves that way, the British government spent less money purchasing all the slaves and then freeing them. They spent less money than the union did on ammunition because the American civil war was not about freeing the slaves.

It was a power trip. It was part of a fourth turning. It was part of the building of the centralized nation state and the industrial revolution. Slavery was a factor, but it was something that could have been solved peacefully for a tiny amount of money and no lives lost. And so they're now trying to get some more money. Some of the descendants, they didn't get compensated by you know the people who were slaves they didn't get any compensation from the british government that i know of uh as as far as a stipend or anything like that the plantation owners got the money and so they're coming back and saying well that was a raw deal but again this is something that happened 150 60 70 years ago I don't support reparations,

trying to right historical wrongs after a dozen generations or something like that. That's nonsense. Let's get back to this, though. We have to move forward, and we have to get justice. And as Brian Shulhavi said, it may be impossible to do it, but we're going to pursue it in the spirit of William Wilberforce. So he says, you know, who should lead this?

He says, if you search Dr. McCullough's name on health impact news, you'll probably find just as many positive articles about him as you do any negative ones. He says, I gave him credit due to him promoting early treatments for COVID with safe and existing drugs, which could have saved the lives of millions of people. Bravo, well done, Dr. McCullough. He's been very good in terms of talking about the mechanism, just as he did this week, the danger of myocarditis.

He's paid a big price for that in his career as well. And so he says, bravo, Dr. McCullough. But Dr. McCullough has also tried to censor health impact news, has threatened us via red voice media with slanderous statements against us, publishing the truth about his ties to big pharmaceutical companies. Peter McCullough has received $387,000 in payments from Big Pharma, including vaccine companies who produce the COVID

9-11 vaccine bioweapons. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10

euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus

gamblingcare.ie. In 2020 and 2021. This is public information. Anybody can fact check these numbers at open payments. He is now promoting his own treatment protocol for patients, and it includes the emergency use authorized Pfizer product Paxlovid. You see? He's not he's got great information

but he's not going to be the person who needs to be leading a Nuremberg style investigation. Same thing with Dr. Joseph Latipo, Florida's Surgeon General. As Surgeon General, not only has he not stopped

the bioweapon shots from being distributed in the state of florida but he still recommends them for certain age groups including young men young women who are pregnant and of childbearing age he also promotes the cdc vaccine schedule dr latipo florida surgeon general and in the most recent roundtable discussions here in florida where a bunch of experts got together to talk about corruption, the dangers of the COVID-19 shots, several of the doctors on his panel actually lied to the people of Florida by stating that every other vaccine other than the COVID-19 vaccine was

perfectly safe. And the parents should give all of them to their children. This is, Paul Offit has been one of the biggest, he's a doctor, medical doctor. He's been one of the biggest cheerleaders of vaccines. One of the biggest critics of anybody who questioned their safety. And at the very beginning of operation warp speed, Dr. Paul Offit said, we've got to stop this. And he wasn't doing it because Trump was in office. And we saw a lot of that, you know, I don't want Trump getting credit for this.

I want to, and then they did take credit for it. And then Mark Levin says, you gotta take credit for this. You're the one who did it. Don't let Biden take credit for the bioweapon. You did the bioweapon. But Dr. Paul Offit opposed it. And he said, we're rushing this thing through without testing. And this is going to be huge. It's going to go worldwide. And if we hurt people, it could damage the entire vaccine industry. And we don't want that. So he opposed it, not on partisan political grounds, but he opposed it to protect the vaccine industry.

And this is why you see the kind of games that are being played in Florida. I've asked many times, and a lot of people have said, well, you know, the reason why DeSantis is asking the Florida Supreme Court to allow a grand jury to investigate the vaccines. I said, why does he need to do that? He's governor. He's got an attorney general. He's got all these different. Well, you know, I've had lawyers contact me and said, well, he wants to do this across the state.

And, you know, the ability to convene a grand jury and all the rest of this stuff, that has to be done on a county-by-county basis. So if he wants to do it across the state, if he wants to have a grand jury across the state, he's got to go to the Supreme Court. It's like, I understand how that works, but the question is, why do you need a grand jury? You got the State Bureau of Investigation.

You have an attorney general. They investigate crimes all the time. They don't ask for a grand jury permission to investigate a crime to do that. Why doesn't he take the lead in it? Other lawyers have said, well, it's a really smart move because he's going to be putting the grand jury in. They're going to be doing the investigation and all the rest of the stuff. I understand. It's politics. He's putting politics in his presidential run ahead of stopping this bioweapon. And, of course, he doesn't want to offend the big pockets,

the deep pockets. Even if he doesn't take money directly from the pharmaceutical companies, even if he doesn't get money directly from Pfizer, how many of DeSantis' people do you think own stock in that or have some kind of a vested financial interest in that, people that would give to him? Speaking of money, VaccineImpact.com points out that Surgeon General Joseph Latipo makes $437,000 a year.

I think that's, we're talking Fauci money here. I think it's more than Fauci makes in salary. Who knows how much Fauci is getting, you know, and kickbacks under the table and the rest of this stuff. University of Florida College of Medicine announced that it would pay Latipo a base salary per year of $262,000 as a professor. Then the Department of Health is contributing $150,000 a year to the University of Florida toward that salary. But the state is also paying $100,000 a year directly to LATIPO. And so it all adds up, right?

It all adds up. So he's making a big salary out of that. But he goes on to talk about Dr. Simone Gohl. Look, Dr. Simone goal. I have no doubt about the fact that she has been at the forefront of making it clear about, uh, you know, these alternative treatments. She's paid a big price for that. Uh, she's gone to jail because she was passionate about talking about it on January the 6th. So all these different, um, things have been happening and you could go read the article about what he has to say about it on January the 6th. So all these different things have been happening and you

could go read the article about what he has to say about it. But let me just read you the summary after he goes through and talks about the different vested financial interests of these various people that I mentioned at the beginning. What he says is that none of this is to discredit what they have done. And he values it. He says, again, I want to reiterate my motivation in publishing this data is about these declared new leaders of the vaccine resistance movement. All of these organizations and people have contributed valuable information about the fraud of the shots. And they paid a price as well. He says, I'm not suggesting that anyone should stop reading or following their work, but

when it comes to the topic of solutions, where do we go from here? He said, I think we need to ask these tough questions about their funding and about their motivations. Is that going to make a difference to them? And it may not be a matter even of corruption. I'm going to lie to people, and I'm going to get paid to lie to people. These are people who believed all this stuff. And for them, as I as i said many times they

didn't understand the political dimension of this the politics is the easiest thing it's difficult to understand and approve what is happening in a health way you know the mechanisms the health mechanisms what's going on in people's bodies what the spike protein is doing and so forth. That takes time. That's why they rushed this. They rushed it because they didn't want to have time and evaluation. And so these people are trying to do, I mean, we're still, you know, in a regular test, we, this would take 10 years for them to put this thing out. Right. That's what Fauci was saying.

So, you know, we're only 1,029 days into this. And so, you know, we're only about a third of the way through the trial. Now we know a lot of information, but they're trying to pretend that it doesn't exist. And we know a lot of this information because of these people, but we need to move to the next step. And the problem is not so much what they're paid but the problem is that they still see the pharmaceutical industry as a good thing it is not a good thing it's an evil thing uh Pfizer didn't make one mistake they have a criminal rap sheet at LiveScore bet we love

Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly

18 plus gambling care.ie that goes on for decades we'll be right back Thank you. All right. I want to thank Brian Pitts. Thank you very much for the tip. He says, good morning, David. Can you do a show one day that covers the adverse effects of mandatory child vaccines? Yeah, I should go back and cover that again. I mean, that's what we talked about a great. It's one of the reasons I saw this happening.

I was talking about this before many years before Trump and all the rest of this stuff. So we did talk about that for a long time. But yeah, I should go back and review that. Michael Graves, thank you very much for the tip. He said, thank you for speaking truth. Well, thank you, Michael, for supporting us. Confidential Pfizer and government documents confirm ADE, VAED, I'll explain these, and AIDS due to COVID-19 vaccination have led to millions dying suddenly and still counting.

This is a very detailed article I'm not going to go into, but I recommend it to you if you want to go further from the expose. The expose. Their website is expose-news.com. But here's the summary. Some individuals are developing ADE, which is antibody dependent enhancement. Many vaccine experts are saying that's what the boosters are going to do. Uh, and vaccine associated enhanced disease. That's the VAED. If that weren't alarming enough, official documents also prove that a mysterious form of acquired immune deficiency syndrome is also appearing in a

disturbing number of recipients just five months after their initial injections. And again, we never have solved what the cause of acquired immune deficiency syndrome is. Fauci said it's HIV and he used the PCR test. And the guy who invented the PCR test, Kerry Mullins, said he's lying to you. You can't prove that connection with my test. He won a Nobel Prize for that. And he was furious about that. And so they waited to pull this thing until he died.

Or maybe, you know, it was a bit more convenient than that, that he died just before this COVID-9-11 began. Health care workers are crying foul on the FDA, claiming that it didn't prohibit ivermectin for COVID-19. Dr. Yusuf Salibi has practiced medicine for more than 30 years. He serves patients in South Carolina. Until recently, he had never faced an investigation from his state medical board. But after he started prescribing ivermectin to his patients, he was reported to the board, which opened an investigation, despite the state attorney general's promise that his office would not prosecute doctors who

prescribed off-label medications. And again, we said over and over again, ivermectin had been used for decades. It had not been used for horses. It had been used for people. It had a different thing that had been approved for specifically, river blindness. However, its safety profile was well known known and it's not uncommon for people to use what they call off-label to prescribe something for off-label use. It's been tested and approved as being an effective treatment for condition A. And somebody says, well, you know,

let's try it for condition B and if it works, they start using it. That's called off-label because it hasn't been officially approved for that particular disease by the FDA, but they already have done a safety profile on it and in these particular cases, like you see with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, they had many decades, 50, 60 years of general use. Perhaps with HCQ it's even longer. Uh, but the citation of the letter appears to be from an FDA advisory that was issued in March 2021 that was titled, Why You Should Not

Use Ivermectin to Treat or to Prevent COVID-9-11. But of course, we also had NIH studies that were ignored, talking about hydroxychloroquine. We talked about that a couple of times yesterday with the guard and also in the body of the show yesterday. They did not say, and this is the way the FDA is responding. They are responding with legal tricks and prevarications like they did with approved versus authorized.

We've approved Cormonati, but that's not available in the U.S. But it's legal, but it's legally distinct and on and on. So we can keep our emergency use authorization protections, but then we can mandate it to you. These types of legal tricks that the FDA has played. What a bunch of criminals they are. Approved versus authorized. So this is what they're saying about this. Well, they didn't say it was prohibited. They didn't say it was unlawful. They also didn't say the doctors may not prescribe it. What did they do? Well, they mocked people.

Just stop using this. You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all, stop it. You know, that's the kinds of things that the FDA did. Pharmacies are responding to the practice, and providers are trying to write ivermectin the same way the FDA was behaving. Again, if you go back and you look at their study,

why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent this and now they say well we didn't prohibit it we just told people don't use it yeah you get a letter from the fda talking about that and we talked about this at the very beginning as well any doctors who wanted to prescribe hydroxychloroquine and then ivermectin. You had some states, I think Michigan was one of them, where they put out a statement from the state saying, do not, to the pharmacists, do not fill any of these prescriptions for doctors. Wow, that's amazing. You got politicians who are practicing medicine. They've never said, don't fill a prescription from a doctor. This is the kind of authority that they've taken away from us. Intervening and interposing themselves into the doctor-patient relationship

and overruling what a doctor has to say. So you will not fill this, they told the pharmacist, but you will take the person's name and report them to us. So now they want to pretend that this was not a case of intimidation. Well, actually, we know exactly what was happening. And while all this stuff was happening, while they were threatening doctors, threatening pharmacists, just remember that this is what you heard on the media all the time. We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us. People who are incubators for every variant to come, walking around lawfully unvaccinated, that's psychotic. For the unvaccinated, you're looking at a winter of severe illness and death.

For yourselves, your families, and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm. In a world of threats and tyrants and terror, you know what our biggest enemy is in America? Our fellow Americans. They are the ones that are propagating this outbreak. Being frustrated that there is still a percentage of the population who are not vaccinated. I wish that he would go further to restrict the activities of the unvaccinated. Vaccinated person having a heart attack. Yes, come right on in.

We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo. Rest in peace, Wheezy. 25% can cause a lot of damage, and they are. If you're willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an enemy. Well, you know, it's my rights. Okay, but I don't care. The pandemic of the unvaccinated.

Look, the only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated and they're killing people. Freedom not to follow the facts, even if your freedom kills people. What kind of freedom is that? What kind of freedom do they really want? We have a pandemic because of the unvaccinated and they're selling enormous the unvaccinated overcrowd. Our hospitals are overrunning emergency rooms and intensive care units, leaving no room for someone with a heart attack or pancreatitis or cancer. Shouldn't they have to pay more into the system because they are collapsing our health system they are the ones in the ers vaccination universally have the military run it if you don't want to get

vaccinated you better be ready to prove your conscientious objector status in court almost like it's going to be two americas yeah propaganda and projection, right? These people are the murderers. These people are the ones who destroyed medicine. They destroyed science. They are not medicine. They're not science. They are the destructors of those. So now Japan has launched an official investigation into millions of COVID vaccine deaths.

And this may be our crack coming out of japan as i report it's not in this story but as i reported before remember they pulled off first it was like 1.2 or 1.3 million vials and i think they need to start spelling that V I L E S of Pfizer shots. I think it was Pfizer. I can't remember now if it was Pfizer and we're done, but I think it was Pfizer because they found some particulates and these things that were dark, dark particulates that reacted to magnets and said, okay,

we're not going to allow that to be injected into anybody. And then they did it again with an additional million. Same thing. Two different times, two different groups of batches or whatever. And so now that was Japan. And now in Japan, researchers are being instructed to investigate the mechanisms by which experimental mRNA jabs could be causing deaths and adverse reactions. You see, there's no question that they're causing death.

There's no question that they're injuring people. The question is the mechanism. And so, you know, Hiroshima University School of Medicine professor Masataka Nageo highlighted how the bodies of vaccinated persons that he performed autopsies on were abnormally warm. He said they had temperatures up to 100 degrees. The first concern was the body temperature of the corpses was very high when the police performed the autopsy. The temperatures were unusually high. The research has led him to conclude that the vaccine causes immune system abnormalities that prompt inflammation throughout the body, which is likely the cause of the high body temperatures at the time of the autopsy.

One other person who is investigating it as well, another report, a dermatology expert from the Kochi University School of Medicine said the spike protein derived from the vaccine was found in the skin. It's pervasive. It goes everywhere. And we've been saying this for the longest time. Interestingly enough, the first we heard of that in the U.S. was from a doctor out of Canada who was punished severely. But his source was a Japanese study talking about biodistribution of this. You get shot in the arm. It doesn't stay in the arm. It goes everywhere, everywhere in the body. It doesn't stay in the arm. It goes everywhere, everywhere in the

body. And it accumulates in organs, but it even goes into the skin now, says this dermatologist in Japan. The spike protein was found in the skin. They reprogram your body to become a manufacturer of the spike protein. That's why it's not dissipating it's not disappearing and um if they can't get you the first time they keep giving you more and more boosters what this reminds me of you remember the um the old movie um uh what was it lavender and old lace i think with um uh carrie grant and some widows who like to solely poison people with arsenic you know it was a dark arsenic and old lace arsenic and old lace yeah what did i say anyway yeah the the mind is not

quite there anymore um it can take a while for me to remember a name if i can remember a name but yeah arsenic and old lace thank you travis i have to delegate some i only remember that because one of my exes was obsessed with that movie oh really yeah okay well that's good uh not that she was obsessed with that but that you remember it anyway uh you know the gradual slow poisoning that you get with arsenic you know that's what these boosters are and um you know because the mrna reprograms your body to manufacture this toxic thing, and then we keep giving you more of it. It's absolutely insidious, isn't it?

I mean, you're talking about a bioweapon, and funded lavishly by unlimited amounts of money from the U.S. government. They don't have to account for any of this stuff. Just another trillion dollars here, another $4 trillion here. Who cares? He highlighted a slide showing a bright green region on a lesion that was made visible by a special dye. Spike proteins are locally suppressing the immune system, he said.

As a result, spike proteins facilitate the reactivation of the herpes virus. And of course, it's not just that. It's also reactivation of cancer, many other diseases. The function of the spike proteins to produce adverse reactions is the formation of blood clots, he explained. And even worse. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival,

we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie. Spike proteins can also locally induce inflammation. So this is research that is coming out of Japan. Again, they have taken action on behalf of their citizens, and they're now digging further into this. On the other hand, we have the u.s army

and the pentagon and despite all efforts to stop this insanity of injecting soldiers or kicking them out they now have more legal tricks you know just like the fda well we told everybody not to use it but we didn't prohibit it and um you know we got this authorized versus approval thing. Well, now the Pentagon is doing the same thing. They're saying when they stuck this into the NDAA and said, you will not continue the mandate, well, the lawyers of the Pentagon have got something to say about that. The 2023 NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act, ordered the Department of Defense to rescind the August 24th, 2021 memo that ordered does not address a second memo from November of that year that applies the mandate to the National Guard and to the reserves. You understand what they're saying? Okay, so Congress puts this thing in and says, you know, that memo that you put in, in August of 2021, that's now going to be removed. Okay. But we did another one a couple

of months later where we brought in the national guard and the army reserves, and you didn't say anything about that. So we can still do that. That's the game they're playing. I tell you, it's, it's amazing to me. They know. There's no question that they know. Everybody knows about this. The Pentagon knows about it. The Biden administration knows about it. They're partners in murder. And this is a purge.

They need to purge people who have ethics, who have loyalty to the Constitution and individual liberty. Those people must be purged by the military. And that has massive consequences for all of us. I'm bothered about this for what it's doing to individuals. And I talk about these insidious mandates being done by corporations, by entire industries, and all the rest of the stuff. But the worst one of these are the military mandates. Because after they purge the people who have understanding who

have conscience about this who take the constitution seriously once they get rid of those people the people who remain and the people who survive will be the ones that they're going to use to enforce whatever is next on us you understand um so you know pray about that they're going to use to enforce whatever is next on us. You understand? So pray about that. They may still get a conscience. God can change anything. The CDC, by the way, just in case you don't understand where these people are coming from, and the unified agenda, the CDC is now pushing the transgender issue in schools.

They're pushing trans activism on teachers. This is from the Daily Caller. The CDC is now urging teachers to become transgender activists through an assessment tool, which gauges their classroom practices. They're encouraging teachers to have rainbow flags in the classroom, to use gender neutral language, and to get involved with gay straight alliance clubs that is the global agenda all of this transgender stuff this pedophile agenda it is part of the global agenda just as

abortion was you know the single child policy which they're going to eventually impose, try to impose everywhere. This has always been about population control, controlling the people who live and making sure there's fewer of us. The elites are worried about us, and they should be. If people wake up, if people wake up, they've got a lot to be afraid of. The FDA is going to allow pharmacies to dispense abortion pills. This is something that previously they had to go to a clinic to get. Now they're going to allow it to be sold at any pharmacy with a prescription.

So they're trying to make it more ubiquitous. But here is, I think, one of the key articles of the day. This came from reclaimthenet.org. Listen to this. Researchers are testing biometric recognition of newborns for the purpose of tracking their vaccines. They're looking at setting up biometric recognition of you from birth, your children from birth, your grandchildren from birth,

so they can impose these vaccine regimes on them universally. They're not moving back from this. And this is why it is so important to not have the people leading this that simply think that this is a problem with the Trump shots and warp speed. The vaccines are the justification, were the justification for the digital ID and the vaccine passports and the travel controls, just as they're going to use climate for that,

but that was a justification for these individual IDs, and they're going to have to continue to do that. I mean, they can shut people down to save the planet, but then how do you justify for the planet? How do you justify a digital ID? Well, you can do it by saying we have to look at the energy consumption on an individual basis or something like that. But it's primarily going to be for vaccines are going to be their justification to do this. We got to control disease. So work has been underway. Reports reclaim the net.

Work has been underway for a while in the U.S. to achieve an effective level of collecting people's biometric data from the very moment they're born. They've been taking core blood samples for quite some time and that type of stuff. But still, the purpose, they're creating a database of biometric stuff, fingerprints and other things. And it's difficult because your appearance changes quite a bit

from a newborn baby. It'd be kind of freaky if it didn't at this point, I guess. The purpose is to make sure newborn babies and young children are identified and monitored for health care purposes. You know, we need to, Mrs. Robinson, we need to know a little bit about you for our files. It's just to help you, you know, it's for healthcare purposes. Just like, you know, the brain computer interface

and being able to read memories and to implant false memories, that's being run by DARPA because they're so concerned about soldiers with PTSD. Well, if you're concerned about that, stop sending them to wars that are not necessary. No, it's not about that. And the robots are not about helping little old ladies across the street and all the rest of the stuff, right? This is not about health care purposes. Yeah, we got to be able to hack into your brain so that we can turn you into cyborgs for the paralyzed people and things like that.

And we'll let the blind see and the lame will walk and all the rest of this stuff. Well, yeah, what else will you do with that? And is that why you're working so hard on this just because you're philanthropists and you've got a lot of empathy for people who are blind and crippled? No, no. A recent clinical study into how this is going to use technology that is currently available has been published by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. It was carried out by the University of California, San Diego. The study makes a note that while adults are relatively easily processed by biometric tech, the same is not true of very young humans, hence a problem to solve.

In a world the study's authors believe is going to be universally calling for the use of biometrics. There has been, I haven't talked about this article on the show, but as part of the pants-on-fire bug-out from Afghanistan, where they left a lot of stuff behind, people, there's entire groups that have been formed to try to get very dangerous weapons that are being sold on eBay. You know, people got all the billions of dollars or tens of billions of dollars of weapons that were left behind

in the bug out from Afghanistan. And they're selling them all over the place, even on eBay. And so when they see the public things, it's like, ooh, let's buy that. And they bought some of these things. And, of course, some of the things that were left behind, I reported on this when it happened. Some of the people were saying they have devices there

that they use to identify friend and foe with biometric information. And they would store the information there, a lot of information about the people, along with their biometric profile. And it was being used by American forces in Afghanistan. They left behind a lot of those things. And some of the people who bought them, some German researchers and stuff, you know, bought them off of eBay and other places. They said, we were amazed. All that data is still there.

And it's very detailed information about everybody. You know, political profiles and everything, but also all their biometric information. data is still there and it's very detailed information about everybody you know political profiles and everything but also all their biometric information but if you stop and think about that that is again when you look at the medical and the military stuff that's being done it's ultimately being tried in these wartime situations but it's going to be applied to us in our countries. And so we're not that far away from the point where you can have soldiers on the street or police, because we have a literal army of police in America and they could be armed

with these biometric databases to identify everybody and to pull you out of a crowd and take you somewhere else. This is what we should be concerned about, and these people are obsessive about it, and they want to do this and build a biometric database of everybody from birth, and this is the American government that's doing this, and then they use other places to run the test.

They'll do the beta test in Afghanistan, or they'll do the beta test in China. The non-randomized study included 500 children in Mexico. Kids and newborns were fingerprinted to provide what is known as longitudinal biometric system recognition. That means that they're going to look at the changes over time. So they get biometric information on these kids and look at how that biometric information is changing over time.

The study found that the biometric verification accuracy had a 77% success rate for babies if they got the information from the babies when they were three days old. But they found that it went from 77% accuracy to 96% accuracy if they waited an additional day. If you get the biometric information from newborn babies that are four days old, it is 96% accurate for the rest of their life. In order to commercialize it, the U.S. government is teaming up with fingerprinting gurus such as NEC, a company that strangely advertises itself as orchestrating a brighter world.

In order to justify the use of the device, they turned to the United Nations. Quote from the study, these data suggest that a high-resolution free space imaging technique may fill the gap for universal biometrics across all populations, called for by the UN's Sustainable Development Goal 16.9 when, as I've said many times, the UN had agenda 21. Sometime in the 21st century, we're going to put everybody into a reservation-like system, you know, like the Indian reservations, giant mega cities. And then in 2015, they got very specific about it. UN 2030 agenda for sustainable development. So by 2030, this is going to happen. And then they got very specific about the goals.

They have a lot of different goals. 16.9, goal number 16, and the ninth part of that goal is to make sure that we have universal biometrics for every person on earth. This is how dangerous this whole thing is. It's absolutely insane. Do we have Tony ready? Tony's going to be joining us. And I'll just say one more thing before we end.

None of this stuff is ending, by the way. You've had all the stuff with Djokovic and he can't play tennis and all this other kind of stuff without vaccines and things. Now the handball World Cup is demanding that all players be triple vaccinated, tested daily, and then if you test

positive, you've got to be quarantined for five days. This is not 2020. This is not 2021 or 2022. This is for 2023. It's not going anywhere. And so I said, I would begin with dead bodies and I would end this segment with dead bodies. The dead bodies in China, all the alarming mainstream media reports about how families are grieving and some are, you know, seeing their, you know, taking pictures of the bodies that are being cremated. At the beginning of this, I said that somebody was going to jail, a funeral home director

was going to jail for 20 years because they were supposed to cremate dead bodies. Instead, they were selling the bodies for scientific research. Well, in China, you have videos emerging of people mourning and of corpses being burned and everything. That may very well be true. We don't know what they died of, do we? Were there any autopsies being performed? No. Were there any claims throughout all this lockdown that anybody was even sick?

No. They were locking down Shanghai alone, 26 million people. They just keep going with it. And we don't even claim that anybody's getting sick. They, after five or six months of this, they said, we had somebody die from COVID. Somebody died with COVID, should say. An 86-year-old man died. So where are these bodies coming from?

Oh, this is because now they've stopped the lockdown. That means that we all need to do lockdown again. No, maybe these are bodies that, people that didn't get any medical treatment. Maybe they starved to death in their apartment. Maybe there were other medical conditions that they had that they were unable to get anything from. Perhaps this is a big backlog of people who didn't just die in lockdown, but maybe they died from lockdown.

And, of course, the other possibility is that the whole thing is a deliberate fraud, like most of this stuff has been, we'll be right back. Stay with us. Hey, hey, hey. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, and joining us now is Tony Ardaban of wisewolf.gold, and Tony has graciously set up davidknight.gold, where you can be redirected to his website. It sells gold and silver and Bitcoin. And we've been talking about, you know, the coming war on crypto. And so many people are talking about how they think 2023 is going to be the year of gold.

I look at it and I think it's going to be the year of CBDC. But what's on your radar? And a happy new year. Second person I've interviewed, first person I interviewed this year was Gard yesterday. I'm in good company, just following Gard Goldsmith, the great Gard Goldsmith. That's right. I wanted to say I've got my David Knight mug, so it can't be a bad interview today. I went to the David Knight show.

You can too, ladies and gentlemen. Go to thedavidknightshow.com and get yourself a David Knight mug. That's right. Thank you. I was listening to you this morning on my way into the shop, and I heard you talk about how you could double your income if you were to uh advocate for the vaccine and uh you know i i i i felt a hint of maybe if you promoted maga

and i thought it's not double david it'd be like a thousand it'd be like a thousand oh yeah yeah i mean people don't realize when you take a line like you've taken where you're going against the grain of even the alternative media in a lot of ways that it's a lonely road sometimes. But you've got a magnificent audience and people love you and want you to continue to do what you do. Because, again, here we are in 2023. How many predictions have come true from the great David Knight? And that's why. Well, thank you.

I look at it and it's like Martin uh, Martin Luther said, you know, God help me, but here I stand. I have to do it. You know? I mean, I couldn't, I could not do that. I could not deliberately lie to people about what is happening. Uh, cause I'm going to stand before God one day, you know, and that's what Martin Luther understood as well. Uh, you know, if we understand that we are accountable and that there's no way to escape this accountability, and if we have any compassion for other people, we have to do it this way. I mean, it's just, there's, I just can't understand the other approach to it. What a short-sighted, destructive approach that is to just do it for the money and think you're going

to get away with it. It's just amazing. God heart god knows what you know right and then that's the thing about gaining financially by you know playing both ends against the middle right or hedging i think we this is not a time to triangulate or hedge we have to stand for the truth and it's i mean like you talk about the year of cbdc um historically david what does that mean for us you know I think it's everything is on the line. It's, you know, Charlie Robinson has been on your show. He wrote the octopus of global control and the controlled demolition of the American empire. He said, CBDC is the hill to die on. That's right. I thought that is the most apropos statement I've heard in a long time. It is the hill to die on. We talk about every time I come on because, you know, the mainstream is not going over this. I spoke to the young Republicans in Rockwall, Texas last week,

right before the end of the year. And I said, raise your hand if you heard of CBDC. Nobody. They're following these conservative lines and, you know, listening to Fox news and traditional talk radio. And I've got one hour on traditional conservative talk radio in San Antonio, so they haven't heard me. But again, it's not being talked about. And it's the biggest story of our time. That's right. Yeah. And, you know, I've had Senator Frank nicely on interviewed him here in Tennessee. He's trying to put together an effort to, you know, have a state bank. You know, they're worried about just the financial issues, the collapse of the debt and all the rest of this stuff but you know cbdc is also part of what he's concerned about he understands that and um i interviewed him and he contacted me he said you know would you be willing to talk to

uh i'm trying to push this bill through would you be willing to speak in favor of i absolutely would love to do that but if i do that i'm gonna have to get you to take the program or guard or something do that good uh but you know i mean that's how there's nobody talking about it, you know, and so they're scrambling around. They even find me to talk about it because nobody else is talking about it, you know. So they're desperate to find somebody that is paying attention to the CBDC because it really is coming in under the radar. And it's coming in very fast. It's a stealth bomber that's going to deliver a nuclear bomb to our society if we don't stop this thing we've got to have some safeguards and some alternatives about this you know if you can't get a state bank at least you can you know

get gold and silver and things like that that are going to um uh to help you with that i mean that's that's the key thing you got to to do something to preserve things for yourself because you can't count on any politicians at any level to be able to get this stuff done. No, you can't. And you talked about opening and closing the last segment with dead bodies. I think the next body you'd be talking about is the U.S. dollar.

I talked about it being on hospice about a year ago with the BRICS nations emerging and the new basket of currencies that they're putting together. The dollar is in a real crisis. It's not talked about in the mainstream. But again, basket of currencies versus our basket case currency, right? But that's exactly right. And I think if you look to what's happening with the bricks nations emerging they don't they don't want to deal in dollars anymore and again i think that's going to be it could be the the

crisis that's used to push the the central bank digital currency right there's going to have to be some kind of problem reaction solution for them to really bring it in for people to accept it that's right but people like like people accepted the lockdowns. And it's multidimensional too. I mean, you know, as I was talking about the European central bank, uh, last couple of days, they're out there making the case, look, proof of work like Bitcoin and all these other cryptocurrencies, proof of work is bad. It's using too much energy. It's dirty money. We got to go to proof of stake. You're going to go to something that's fiat. You're going to, the proof is going to be, we say so. Right. And so that's laying the foundation for CBDC.

So they will have some kind of an economic collapse and a run. The FDIC is already talking about that. You know, hey, let's not tell everybody how shaky the system is because if we told them what we know, they would be really upset. That's a clip I played on Tuesday. And so they're going to have a financial crisis like that, but they're also creating this idea that any alternatives to CBDC that's out there like Bitcoin, that's got to be stopped because that's a threat to our survival because of the climate, McGuffin.

Yeah, and they'll go after Bitcoin first. Yes. Because Bitcoin doesn't have a company. It doesn't have a country. You can't centrally just shut it down like you can every other cryptocurrency on the market. I know there's a lot of great cryptocurrencies, but they all track back to someone who's in charge somewhere. You can't do that with Bitcoin. It was set in motion that way. And again, jury's still out. Is it good or bad? I don't know. I've used it since 2016 and Bitcoin's been pretty good to me. I don't promote it like I promote precious metals because I like that you can physically hold something in your hand as opposed to something digital. But I do like Bitcoin.

And it's funny, I read a book recently called Beef and Bitcoin. Somebody taking the cattle industry, promoting organic cattle farming and then how that's bashed. And they took Bitcoin at the same time. And the things about energy were brought up. And so this researcher said, well, let's see how much energy the actual banking industry uses. And it just dwarfs Bitcoin by factors of like a hundred. I mean, they use their ATMs and their branch locations and all the offices and everything else. You just dwarf Bitcoin and it makes it look

like nothing. So it's so much propaganda. That's kind of when you know you're in the right business, when you're getting criticized by the mainstream. And I can see how this propaganda is going to be weaponized against Bitcoin. You know, as they're taking this tact that it's got to be shut down, just like internal combustion engines have to be shut down. I played the clip of all the people pushing, all these public figures pushing the public to hate people who aren't vaccinated. You know, we all got our 15 months of hate. You know, it's even more than the opponent and Big Brother got. You know, he only got 15 minutes of hate every day. But we got that continuously for many, many months.

And they will do the same thing. They will vilify people who use crypto. You're keeping us from being able to heat our homes. You're keeping us from being able to go anywhere because we can't charge our electric cars. They're going to do all of that stuff to demonize people who have crypto to get the public to hate them. Because you heard when, you know, Jimmy Kimmel says, you know, you haven't been vaccinated. Sorry, pal, you're going to die. And all the people in this stupid audience are cheering.

That's what they're going to be able to do to anything that they want to take down. They, they have such amazing reach with their propaganda. Yeah. I can't wait for the Yale study to come out. Like the one I read on your program back in 2020, I think it was right before August. And it was like,

Oh, this is the, the shame strategy or the the the team factor strategy they had every every different strategy that you could use to get people to take the vaccine that wasn't even out yet love your neighbor it's it's science it's a miracle and you'll be like i've seen this movie before yeah that's that's how it was so easy to spot this because we had seen this movie before we'd seen it with the vaccine industry, the flu shots and everything on an annual basis. It was a rerun, and it was something that they'd been practicing for 20 years.

They'd laid the foundation for it for 20 years. As far as I'm concerned, it's why I started calling it COVID-9-1-1, COVID-9-11, because it was the other shooter drop from 9-11. It's an extension of Dark Winter. That's right. From the very beginning. Also looking at the economy, David, Michael Snyder, I don't know if you read this article, there's 11 ominous signs for 2023.

This came out a couple of days ago on Zero Hedge. And of course, Michael Snyder writes for the Economic Collapse blog. All 11 predictions were economic, the economic collapse blog all 11 predictions were economic which i i agreed with all 11 and it really just not really predictions but just statements from like the imf the imf says and that's the international monetary fund says that the one-third of the world will be in a recession uh by the first or second quarter uh i agree with that and i think they're probably underestimating that, which is weird too, because banks usually cheerlead the economy, even if it's the,

you know, bank of international settlements or the IMF, they're always trying to keep calm. But they said that, you know, the IMF has said recently, they want to raise rates and everyone should raise rates to save humanity, to help people. And I'm'm thinking when have you banksters ever done anything for humanity but then i see articles and one of the same uh 11 signs was in there was michael burry from you know the big short fame uh he said that uh we're in a recession all the key signs are there and now the the fed's gonna have to lower interest rates to stave off a recession. I don't think that they will. Because they've been raising rates. Again, I think the strong dollar is what they really care about. And the economy has always been secondary. If they can get both, they'll do it. But I don't know. I

don't know what you think about that, David. The IMF was calling for higher rates. The Bank of International Settlements said, hey, we raise rates, we're going to hurt the economy, and that's what's going to happen. I don't think they're going to be lowering rates. And, of course, Michael Burry said when they lower rates again, it's going to cause even more inflation. I just don't know that they're going to go there. I think the economy to them, the regular everyday operating system to them is very much secondary to using the dollar as the world's reserve currency. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I would think that I would think that they would try to, um, because they want to keep the dollar as a reserve currency, unless they just want to

burn everything down and do a complete financial reset. I think all of they've gotten themselves in a situation where there is no good option to get out of this, right? Recession or inflation. And so I think that was all designed, I think. And we've been talking about this for a long time. You and I have been talking about it and talking about it with Gerald, how they're, you know, intentionally blowing up the system so that they can impose their new normal on us and their new financial system. And all of this stuff has got to be in by 2030. And this is just part of the cycle that we're in with the fourth turning.

They know that all the institutions are going to be reevaluated. They want to make sure that they're the ones who are doing the redefinition of every institution. And they're going to be the ones that are going to melt the institutions down deliberately so they can then build them up in the way that they want to build them up, I think. So I think it is a plan. That's why we have to work in parallel. We have to work outside of this system. The system that they created, they're going to burn down and then they're going to create an even worse system. And so we don't want to be, we want to try to get out of that system as much as possible. It's not going to be possible to get out of it a hundred percent. We want to try to get out of it as much as possible. It's not going to be possible to get out of it a hundred percent. We want to try to get out of it as much as possible.

That's what I'm going to say. You know, when you look at a gold, you know, all these people, even people who will sell gold, we'll make, try to make the case.

Well, this is going to be the year of gold. And Peter Schiff say, I've never been more positive about this. And then he goes on to say, well, you know, Bitcoin is just a speculative investment,

but you're treating gold as if it's a speculative investment. Gold is important now because of CBDC and silver and anything like that, that you can get that is outside of the system. Yeah. I heard you talking about Peter Schiff earlier in the week, and I agree with you on that. It's funny because I, I, that's what I do. I sell gold and silver, but you will rarely ever hear me talking about price. I mean, and that's only in conjunction with what's happening to the dollar.

Because I look at this and it seems silly to me. He talks about the Bitcoin speculative and he's like, but also when the jobless claims come in or whatever happens, or if the Fed's going to move rates, we'll see a giant spike. And that's the way they always follow it. To me, when i research gold david i always look at history like i find like histories of gold or things that are related to it because i want to know where it's been that's right you know kind of like patrick henry you know i like my path of the lamp of experience i know of no other way of judging the future but by the past you look at

the past to see what has happened and of now, we've never seen anything quite like the central bank digital currency that's coming, but they can't circumvent completely the laws of economics or human nature or anything like that. They can try. I mean, they're going to try it with the technology, but to me, I don't think they're going to succeed. You look at something like, I talked about this last time I was on,

but it's the Soviet Union collapsing, and it was an artificial nation. We have artificial constructs everywhere. They're just propped up because they have a giant monopoly money printing press. That doesn't make you smart. That doesn't make you brilliant or it doesn't make you omnipotent. It just makes you a criminal that has access to that. So I think, you know, we, the people looking into 2023, I, I do think that we're going to have some massive economic change. Uh, some of that will be planned and some of it will be a consequence of stupidity that will happen. And I think those,

maybe those factors are even worse because they didn't see it coming. They haven't, they didn't run the simulations correctly. They didn't, they didn't count on, uh, you know, the variables. So I think we'll see a lot of things happening economically. One of the things that I saw was interesting in the Intel report from BlackRock, not that I care so much what they think, but they, they kept saying nothing that has worked in the past will work in, in this climate. Nothing will, will be a fixable like it's been in the past. And so the bubbles that were reinflated in 08, 09, I don't think they're going to be able to do that again, David. It's because of the amount, and we've talked about this since I've been coming on your show, just the amount of currency creation that has dwarfed anything in history. They're not going to be

able to blow this bubble up anymore. I think once it pops and there's a revaluation and this is going to be global on all markets is one of the reasons i believe that the bricks nations are setting up their own exchanges because they know that our exchanges are rigged i mean i talked about this last time one yeah one ounce of physical silver for every 240 sold is the estimate i don't know what it is for gold. I have not seen that number and maybe nobody knows, but it is absolutely manipulated. And does that mean that I'm advocating an increase in price? No, I don't know what's going to happen to the price of gold or silver. I just know that gold and silver are money. And if you hold, say a gold coin, you should get a 10th ounce American gold eagle um nobody can trace that

that's not trackable it doesn't have a serial number it doesn't have any it's just it's just gold gold is gold you can't it doesn't matter where it comes from it's it has no signature other than the stamp that gets put on it by by a mint you don't have to get that either and again if you're dealing in scrap gold like they do in venezuela they just you know scratch it and do a little acid test and that's how how they do it. There are a lot of their exchanges are done. Yeah. Yeah. I would just tell people that that's how a way to get out away from the system

is to hold physical metals. That's right. And, and of course, you know, the bricks understand that as well. And it's not just Russia and China who are looking at this saying, well, you know, Russia's already got a conflict with us. China is, you know, it's a building conflict that is coming down the road. But, you know, we look at what happened with the Freedom Convoy truckers, right? That was a wake-up call to all of us.

You know, look at how they are going to weaponize the financial system. And again, they have done it with PayPal. They have done it with Operation Chokepoint type of stuff. They're doing it and bringing back Operation Chokepoint, saying if you sell guns or you make guns, we're going to give you a code. And, you know, we're going to not honor those, refuse the credit card transactions. They've already shown shots of that happening. So we understand that that is a weaponized system. But when you look at Russia, look at what was confiscated from them.

Far more than was taken from the Freedom Convoy, right? And look at Russia, look at what was confiscated from them, far more than was taken from the Freedom Convoy, right? And look at how they completely shut them down economically. And so that's why they want to get out of it. China sees the same thing coming, but so does India. India is not looking at a current or coming war with the United States, but they don't want to be controlled by these corrupt bureaucrats in the United States and this corrupt system. So everybody's looking to get out of it. We need to wake up about that as well. What are they doing?

You know, they're stockpiling gold. They're trying to set up something that's different. The only good thing about this that I see, Tony, is, you know, the old saying that everybody's got a plan until you get punched in the nose, right? And so what is it going to take for us to punch these people in the nose? Well, I think it's going to be we got to speak directly to them and we got to shout at the top of our lungs what these people are up to. If we can expose their plans, that's a big punch in the nose.

That's a big start because they're very afraid of us because of the numbers that we have. That's why speech is the essence of this. And that's why the controlling the narrative and pushing out the propaganda is the essence of this. But when I look at trends, I don't necessarily look at, well, you know, what happened with the last recession and this and that, and what's going on the last couple of years with gold or the dollar or this. I look at the trends of the creation of the Federal Reserve, Bretton Woods I, Bretton Woods II. These are the types of things that we need to pay.

That's the trend. That's the historical trend, I think, that we need to focus on because they're getting ready to reset the whole financial system and to make us all slaves, direct slaves, of this private Federal Reserve. That's the plan. And the CBDC is the mechanism of it. And that's exactly what Saleh Omarova,

this Marxist-trained economist that Biden wanted to put into the office of the control. She was very explicit about that. She wrote a paper about that. That is the plan. It's an open plan and they're going to do it in every country. Well, the banksters,

they own the 20th century, the slaughter pins of both world wars. They own the democide of the communist government, slaughtering their own people. And I'll tell you how they own it. David, if you were in 1900 and you wanted to go buy a pair of shoes or a new sport coat or anything, whatever you wanted, it was going to cost the exact same as it would have cost in the presidency of George Washington.

There was no inflation. The costs were exactly the same. But as we are here in 2023, you go back 100 years uh everything is different why is that it's because we uncoupled from the bi-metallic system set up by our founding fathers the whole world did you know we talked about how you know in 1914 uh the european powers went off the gold standard they had to they didn't really say they were doing they just again stopped and halting the uh where you could turn in your notes for gold where you could with a gold when it was closed and so they just started printing

more that's how they made the modern you know the modern uh ultra state the the tyranny state that we see now is built on lies and it's built on fiat currency and that's again what's the end game there how is that how is that all going to end up? And I think a history, you know, Gresham's law is something I read about all the time, says, you know, that that's the law that bad money pushes good money out until it doesn't, until it comes back. And then you look, you saw that in Weimar, Germany. The reason we're not the Weimar Republic is because we have a massive Ponzi scheme all around the globe. You know, like I've talked about over and over again, but all the, you know, 80% of all the hundred

dollar bills ever printed are in this country. You know, it's the world's reserve currency. And again, that won't last. That's why the emerging BRICS nations, I keep telling people, this is what you need to be paying attention to. It's funny. I want to talk a minute just for about the speaker race, because it made me laugh, but the politics that we're focusing on, just like when I went and spoke to the young Republicans, they're very smart. They're research, but they're not paying attention to the right things. They're not paying attention to the CBDC. They're not paying attention to the military industrial complex and the surveillance state. They're not paying attention to Agenda 21 because this isn't

in the mainstream. It so it's funny the politics of that though the the speaker race it made me laugh because i always you know beat up on the republican party because i used to be a republican in some sense i ran as a republican but you look at the speaker race and you know you have chip roy who come out and he says um i'm nominating jim jordan we're to stand, you know, because the American people are getting trampled on and we have to do something about the overspending. And then Jim, you know who Jim Jordan? Yeah, McCarthy.

I know. You guys can't even do this right. It's like, it's built into you not to be able to fight back against the system. It made me laugh just the whole day when I realized that. I'm like, so he nominated McCarthy. Everybody else is nominating Jim Jordan. And that, to me, is where we are in our politics. It's just round and round. I do enjoy the fact that he didn't get a Paul Ryan-style coronation that he's having to work for it. It makes me laugh a bit. And I

checked out of politics a long time ago i only study it for to know my enemy that's what i think i think it is funny to watch well you look at jim jordan he's very articulate and and he you know when he gets in a discussion or debate with somebody he can be very aggressive he's knowledgeable uh and and yet as you point out yeah he he doesn't want to buck the system yeah he likes being in the system he's not doing it because I remember when I was in the libertarian party, we'd have to, you know, we'd work really hard to get on the ballot, you know, and it's like, okay, now who's going to run? It's like, um, well, I did it last time you do it this time. And so we know what I saw that with, uh, you know, let's nominate Jim Jordan. Uh, I nominated

McCarthy over here because I don't want to do this. I mean, what is this? The libertarian party meeting or something? I don't want to be the guy on the front and exactly now that's how I ran for congress nobody else wanted to do it so um it's the way uh the way of uh all of this stuff but yeah it is uh it is pretty crazy isn't it and it is going to be a wild ride this year, I think. I think things are just, every year, I think, is going to be accelerating because we're accelerating towards the 2030 society that they want to have completed by 2030. There's a lot of things that have got to be destroyed between now and 2030, and they're working really hard at it.

If you're going to build something back better, you have to destroy it first, and then that is the prerequisite, isn't it? That's it that's right yeah we got to build our bunkers better what we gotta do um bbb yeah build your bunker better that's should be our motto i like i don't know what they're gonna throw at us they're gonna throw nuclear bombs at us or whatever. I mean, it's crazy. These people are murder-suicide capable of all this. Absolutely crazy. And the only way that it makes sense is to put it in a larger spiritual context. That's, I think, the only thing that makes. Because even in the, you know, they're acting in what they see as their own perceived self-interest.

But it's not in their own perceived interest. They're deceived. And, you know, and that's the thing that is our anchor. You know, my preparation is not in the stuff that I store up in my barn or wherever. You know, that's not where I put my treasure. Absolutely not. And you can't trust the system and we can't have normalcy bias. But I think, you know, I've done a couple of different podcasts since the

start of the year. And my theme is I want to be more positive because, you know, we as Christians represent an awesome God who has got us this far and we're here for a reason and things are strange. But again, our responsibility is to carry on no matter what. And I think, you know, when I talk about they they're not they are not themselves, God almighty, the people that are in charge of this, this clattering train, if Winston Churchill would say his old poem that he read when he was a kid about who was in charge of the train. I don't think that they're going to win this as long as we stand together and as long as we have the right information and promote the right organizations and people, they're going to spread that information. So I'm grateful to be here. Grateful to sponsor you. I will say that we can get you on to your next segment. So I'll just say that Wolfpack is growing.

And that's another thing that has just been put into to, to talk about because I'm getting more excited every time somebody joins. I said, we just got a little stronger and I'm, I've been buying product for the, for the pack. And I think everybody's going to like their next shipments. I've been buying a lot of cool stuff, especially fractional silver and stuff. That's never even seen circulation. That's like old dimes and quarters that have been in a bank vault. So I think people will like that. That's cool. But we're going to build a discord i believe david a chat forum and i want to build sort of an intelligence uh an economic intelligence group there where people

can share articles and you have to be a member to get in so i'm working on the back office of that and again you can go to davidknight.gold you can just click the tab that says join wolfpack and learn about it um of course you can always buy directKnight.Gold. You can just click the tab that says Join Wolfpack and learn about it. Of course, you can always buy direct. That's what Wise Wolf does. There's no minimum to buy from me, and there never will be at Wise Wolf. It doesn't matter. So you can call us, and we can send it direct to your doorstep, or you can join Wolfpack or both.

And so there's deals coming down that I think people are going to be really excited about, both silver and gold. And David Knight certainly gets the credit for that. I mean, I would say the bulk of we've got close to, you know, we're getting into the 300-member range, and that is mostly David Knight. Well, that's good. And I like the intelligence idea that you got. You know, even Sherlock Holmes, as smart as he was, and as much as he scanned the London Times all the time, he still had his baker street

irregulars who were feeding him intelligence about what's going on it's absolutely essential to have that distributed intelligence that's one of the things i've always said about why centralized systems fail they may have the smartest people they may have the highest technology but they don't have sufficient input of information to make intelligent decisions and that's what the marketplace has the marketplace is like a neural net versus a cpu of a centrally controlled economy so um it's always good to have people uh that are in your sphere that can um where you can discuss stuff and where they can tell you what they're seeing uh that's the key thing.

It's like a real marketplace, a marketplace of ideas. Well, Tony, thank you so much for supporting the program. And again, thank you for setting up DavidKnight.Gold. Always great talking to you. And we'll be talking throughout the year, God willing. So thank you very much. Appreciate it. All right, we'll be right back, folks.

Stay with us. decoding the mainstream propaganda it's the david knight show i said at the beginning of the program so we need to talk about what's going on with this massive depopulation program, the bioweapon, the COVID-9-11 jab from Trump and Fauci, but we also need to talk about the other shoe of 9-11, and that is climate. I saw this on Monday. I haven't talked about it yet.

I thought it was kind of funny. Thor the walrus ruins New Year's celebration in the UK. The arrival of a huge walrus at the British port town of Scarborough. I guess maybe some of the people who had their fireworks cancelled are thinking that this is Scarborough unfair this year. Scarborough fair on the North Sea. It's thwarted the local authorities New Year's celebration plans.

The huge mammal that they've nicknamed Thor had previously been spotted on the beaches of Hampshire in early December. And of course, we know that in Hartford, Hetherford, and Hampshire, hurricanes hardly happen. But as well as in the Netherlands and France, on Saturday, New Year's Eve, the Scarborough Council announced that it had decided to cancel New Year's Eve fireworks display on the advice of British Divers Marine Life Rescue.

There are concerns that the display could cause distress to the mammal. And of course, uh, many new year's Eve, uh, we've had, uh, distressed mammals who, uh, the four legged dog kind who don't like fireworks. I remember one year when Karen and I were in college, there was, uh, uh, one of our friends had a very small dog, a Yorkshire terrier and the, and, uh, one of our friends had a very small dog, a Yorkshire Terrier. And the, and, uh, when the fireworks started going off, the dog ran and just panicked and ran off and she panicked because the dog ran off and we spent the rest of the night searching for the dog. It was nowhere to be found, but eventually just, you know, came, uh, back wagging its

tail when the fireworks started. So I imagine that kind of might've happened with Thor, the walrus, but we can't take the chance. No telling what that walrus would do to itself. If, uh, it was spooked, the council's head said he was very disappointed that the community had to be left without fireworks, but he stressed the importance of the wellbeing of the walrus came first. They've been doing this to us with snail darters and everything else my entire life.

Thor is believed to have come to the British shores from as far as Canada. With the animal expected to make his way back to the Arctic after a spree, he travels like a polar bear. The polar bears are ranging all over the place. As a matter of fact, the polar bears, which have been the poster children for a lot of this climate alarmism, their populations are so high in Canada's north that they are becoming problematic. And the Intuit Indians are saying, you know, they're, you know, very destructive. They're threatening us and other things.

There's so many of them. That's the reality on the ground. And yet the climate experts and the government and all the rest of these people are talking, oh, they're disappearing. They're disappearing. Well, no, actually, you know, they, there's, well, they talk about declining polar bear populations. Oh, it's caused by global warming. Well, no, there's actually four components to that.

Is their population declining? If it is declining, is it caused by climate change? Another part of that, is there any climate change? And if there is climate change, is it being caused by humans? And the answer to all four of those questions is a resounding no. There is no proof of any of that. As a matter of fact, the only thing we have proof of is the fact that the population of the polar bears is increasing.

The Intuit are concerned about the increasing number of encounters and by property damage by polar bears. The bear population numbers are up to 16,000 in the territories. There's a real problem for these people. They, they create these crises. They tell us the polar bears are disappearing. All these species are going to go extinct. The coral reefs are going to disappear by such and such a date.

And actually they're bigger than ever. Uh, Catherine McKenna, however, in 2017, at the time, Canada's liberal environment and climate change minister used National Geographic video of an ill and aged polar bear in the throes of natural death in the wild. Used that to say it was evidence of climate change-induced species extinction. But the facts of the polar bear population did not line up with the blame that McKenna wanted to place on the SUVs of Canadians. Polar bear population researcher Susan Crockford examined research claims that a population

of polar bears, specifically in Churchill, Manitoba, is declining in numbers due to dwindling sea ice, which in turn caused a decline in the ringed seal population, the main source of food for the bears. Well, the problem with that, again, is a chain of logic. The sea ice is stable as well. And so there is, that is not what is happening. But as they are so concerned about a declining population in their imagination of polar bears or seals or whatever, there is a sinister truth about wind farms this is coming

from the uk where they're talking about the tory party has now returned to their love of wind farms the conservatives had pulled back against that because in rural areas they are despised for many reasons, many good reasons. But the Tory party is now moving ahead full speed to that. It has disadvantages, as I point out here, as we all know, of cost, of unreliability, and of the inefficient use of land. And as I point out, it is a death wish for the Tories. However, it is also a death wish for birds, for bats, and the rest of this. They will soon discover just how unpopular wind farms are. And the person said, whoever thought of that euphemism for these open air power stations?

Anyway, the objections are not just not in my backyard. Though few people enjoy having their view spoiled by structures that stand four times as tall as Nelson's column in Trafalgar. Remember that? That's amazing. And they really are. They are so big. I remember when wind farms are a big deal in Texas. They spent billions of dollars building this infrastructure that failed on us famously in January of 2021, two years ago. And, um, but, um, you see them just taking the blades and it's absolutely amazing when you see them going down the interstate. And when you drive

through these areas, it's kind of a strange, they are so large that they, it feels like they're closer to you than they actually are and and as you're driving and you've got these things scattered all over the hills and these giant blades are rotating you get this strange sensation that you're not really moving you're not getting any closer to these things because they're so big it's it is amazing every time i see one out in a field i understand don quixote a little bit more it's's like, oh, it makes sense. Yeah, I want to attack that. Attack these things, yeah. The BBC, in one of its poorly

named comedy slots last week, mocked people who complained about the wind factories killing birds. They said, well, you know, cats kill more birds than wind turbines do, said the programmer. This person said, well, what was the last time that your cat came home with a golden eagle

or a bearded vulture or a red-throated diver? Wind turbines, unlike cats, single out large, soaring, rare birds. A rare bearded vulture, released in Spain as part of a conservation project recently strayed to the Netherlands and met its end at a wind factory. All over the world, the largest and rarest eagles and vultures are dying in significant numbers as a result of turbines. And they go through country by country talking about what is endangered. In California. It's the golden eagle.

One study found that at a single windy spot in California, Altamont Pass, wind turbines were killing over 1,000 birds of prey per year, including more than 60 golden eagles. I wonder if it's getting any of the California condors. That would freak the environments out, wouldn't it? But, of course, the bats are one of the things that I've seen most frequently. The impact on bats, North American studies estimate that up to a million bats a year are killed by turbines. A German study concluded that each turbine kills an astonishing 70 bats in two months.

You or I would be prosecuted for this. We'd be prosecuted if we killed eagles too, right? I mean, you get prosecuted if they find you with an eagle feather, but the windmills, of course, they can do whatever they want. And of course, it's not the windmills, but it's the politically connected billionaires who own the windmills that are immune from prosecution. One of the things about the bats that kills them is, um, I remember cause we've talked, we talked about this when we're talking about renewable energy about 15 years ago, we're

trying to stop the first mandates in state of Colorado. Uh, that was, I was involved with a group that was involved with a lawsuit and bats breathe very, very rapidly and um what happens with killing the bats because they can move perhaps i don't know if the big birds of prey are being struck by the blades or what the deal is with them but i know that what is killing the bats in such large number are the differences in air pressure the bats bats are breathing very, very rapidly as they're flying. And just like if you're, I know this from being scuba diver, if you dive and you go down and you take a breath from your tank

and then you surface, because every 33 feet, you get another atmosphere of pressure because of the water. So if you take a full breath, uh, you know, deeper down and your lungs are already at maximum and then you surface, they're going to explode. They call it air embolism. And that's, what's happening to the bats. They're coming into these areas. And on one side, it's got higher pressure on the other side. It's got lower pressure.

They're breathing and they may fly in, you know, from the high pressure side, take a breath. And when they hit the, um, uh, the, the low side pressure blows up their lungs. They, they, they find them with exploded lungs. So as we look at all of this and all of the climate issues, it is essential for us to attack the foundation of the climate MacGuffin because the climate MacGuffin is the foundation for CBDC. As I pointed out, that's the way they're arguing about manning Bitcoin and many other things,

making a climate issue of it. It's the foundation of banning cars. It's the foundation of banning our food and banning farms. It's all the climate. And so we have to not try to say, but if we were to do this, it would have less emissions than that. No, you have to attack the lie. Let's not play their game. Let's not use their terms. Let's not go with their assumptions because they're not going to allow any other approach.

That is why they have chosen this thing. There's going to be one way that we're going to proceed, and that's going to direct us, channel us into slavery. That's why they've scoped this thing out. So I thought it was interesting to see this weather prediction coming out of Britain. They said there's going to be a sudden stratospheric warming event. And they actually have a, you know, we've had our, what was it, bomb cyclone or something they called it. They made that up this last night, you know, with the cold weather that came through. Well, now they're going to have an SSW, a sudden stratospheric warming. To create a polar vortex, a SSW event is now looking even more likely to occur this winter

and could happen as soon as the next 10 days. This will mean that cold air over the Arctic will be given a route to cross British shores, and in addition to above-average snowfall, it could pave the way for another big freeze, leaving the cold snap earlier in December as a distant memory. And of course, this is all being caused by the SUVs, I guess. And how do they know this is going to happen? Can they accurately predict this, predict the timing? Well, we'll wait and see.

But over and over again, if you follow the news and the weather reports and we followed them pretty closely over the last year, because, uh, you know, we're concerned about moving to, um, you know, this area, we were worried that it might be too cold for us because we've always kind of lived in, um, in, uh, warmer climates. Uh, but you know, we lived in North Carolina and so we were tracking the, the temperatures pretty closely and, uh, for about a year and, um, you know, track pretty closely with where we were in, um, um, the Raleigh area. And so, yeah, that's fine. And we know what that climate is like. We're trying to get a, a, you know, a line on what it was going to be like

to live here. Didn't want to make a big move and find out that we couldn't handle the climate. And it's been really nice. I mean, we've had the coldest weather I've been involved in, uh, over Christmas, it got down to like two degrees. I'm not talking about windshield factor. I mean, two degrees. Uh, but, um, you know, we weathered it and everything was fine and it's very nice now, but as we're looking at these predictions and they're predicting this

and that and when it was going to happen and uh how much snow we were going to get they were wrong about all that pretty much in general they knew that a big front was coming through and it did come through and maybe they'll get this right but when we look at climate what is the purpose of the climate predictions the climate predictions are there to basically predict weather that is going to be decades out from where we are right now. And I have absolutely no faith in that, none whatsoever, because not only can we see that they are not able to predict accurately the weather, you think they're going to be able to tell you what the weather's going to be, let's

say, five months from now? Oh yeah, they'll know that summer's coming. But beyond that, can they predict it now? And even worse, these climate frauds, these alarmists, have a long history. And I know where these guys come from. And one of the reasons that they're pushing all this is because it is to support the idea of depopulation. That has been Paul Ehrlich's MO from the very beginning. And now he is in his 90s.

And even though he has been wrong about everything his entire life, he was making predictions in the late 1960s and writing books about the population bomb and the coming starvation and the ice age that was going to come and all the rest of this stuff. Even though everything the guy has said is wrong, you still have Scott Paley at 60 Minutes doing a puff piece interview on him as if he knows what's going to happen. Finding solutions to the problems was the goal two weeks ago at the UN Biodiversity Conference, where nations agreed to conservation targets. But at the same meeting in 2010, those nations agreed to limit the destruction

of the Earth by 2020, and not one of those goals was met. This despite thousands of studies, including the continuing research of Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich. You know that there is no political will to do any of the things that you're recommending. I know there's no political will to do any of the things that I'm considering. Politicians want to do everything he says. Which is exactly why I and the vast majority of my colleagues think we've had it, that the next few decades will be the end of the kind of civilization we're used to.

In the 50 years since Ehrlich's population bomb, humanity's feasting on resources has tripled. We're already consuming more than 75% of what the Earth can regenerate. And consider, half of humanity, about 4 billion, live on less than $10 a day. They aspire to cars, air conditioning, and a rich diet. But they want us to be like them. By the fishermen of Washington's Salish Sea, including Armando Briones. The tribe has been fishing salmon here for hundreds of years.

Yeah. And your generation is seeing the end of that. It's getting harder and harder. I hate to say it, I don't want to say it's the end of it. Why do you feel so emotionally attached to this? It's everything we know. I'm fortunate enough to know where I know a lot of different things. I've done a lot of different things in my life.

I've gotten good at evolving and changing, but not everybody here is built like that. And to some of us, this is what they know. This is all they know. The five mass extinctions of the ancient past were caused by natural calamities, volcanoes, and an asteroid. Today, if the science is right, humanity may have to survive a sixth mass extinction in a world of its own making. Oh, no. Oh, no. Now, this is a guy who has been demanding the mass extinction of humans for a long time, Paul Ehrlich. That's his whole thing, the population bomb. We got too many humans.

Now he's worried about species disappearing. And when you talk about that fisherman, what is happening there? Think back to the Dust Bowl situation. That was environmental. Nobody was blaming it on Model As at the time. You know, you got too many Model As out henry ford caused all of this stuff and a lot of it was based on poor farming techniques but it was also weather and other things like that that happened it was not man-made climate change they came back with better stewardship, with smarter farming techniques.

These people need to adjust the way if they're overfishing their areas, uh, it will be the end of all of it if they don't adjust and do this in a wiser way. Uh, but you know, somebody would say the same thing about the dust bowl. All of this stuff is recycled Malthusian alarmism. I remember, um, we read the books where they said, Joe, uh, we,

we just can't keep going this way. We've got so many horses in these cities that we're going to be, uh, knee deep and horse manure. They're just in the city. So we got to stop this. Well, they didn't see the advent of the car.

Did they? Then they said, well, we got too much exhaust that's coming. Well, okay, we can clean that up. We can approach it a lot of different ways.

When you have a problem that is created by one bit of technology, you can always adjust that technology and take a different course, but you don't have to end everything. That's what's different about Paul Ehrlich and this suicide Kool-Aid cult. The end of civilization as we're used to it. Too many people, too much consumption, and growth mania is killing the planet and devastating wildlife, according to Ehrlich.

That's what he's been saying for the longest time. I was alarmed, he said. Again, he's in his 90s. He was doing this stuff when he was in his 30s. I was alarmed. I am still alarmed he said this again he's in his 90s he was doing this stuff when he was in his 30s i was alarmed i am still alarmed all of my colleagues are alarmed that's why they call them alarmists pointless alarmists as well and so there's a great article by steve mo, who I've interviewed many times. He's now with CEI.org. And he put together a long list. And we'll pull these things up so you can see them on the screen.

I'm going to. 2022, same excrement, different year. 55 years of failed ecocalyptic predictions. Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s, and they continue to do so today. And the first several of these articles are the failed predictions of Paul Ehrlich, who is still being put out there by Scott Paley at 60 Minutes. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.

See, this is good news. These are the doom and gloom people. We're the people who have hope, and we understand that these things can be fixed. We're not negative. We're positive about this. I'm positive that they're wrong. I'm positive that they've been wrong my entire life. I've heard this kind of nonsense since I was in high school.

What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science. While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by the media, such as 60 Minutes I just showed you, the failures are not revisited. So let's begin with Paul Ehrlich, 1967. A dire famine by 1975. Did that happen? Well, no, that didn't happen.

This is from the Los Angeles Times. At the time, it is already too late for the world to avoid a long period of famine, said Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich. He's still pushing out this excrement. Paul Ehrlich said, the time of famines is upon us and will be at its worst and most disastrous by 1975. He said the population of the United States is already too big. Birth control may have to be accomplished by making it involuntary.

In other words, mandatory, mandatory birth control. That's why this guy's pushed. He is a very dangerous person. He's been wrong about everything and relentless in it, but he is authoritarian to the core. He hates humanity.

It may have to be mandatory. And he says, and by putting sterilizing agents into staple foods and drinking water. Or you could just inject people with that, right? And make that mandatory. Well, it's not mandatory. We're giving you the choice. You can either travel or go to school or have a job or you, you know,

and take this sterilizing, murdering, Trump shot, or, you know, just enjoy staying at home and house arrest. He said the Roman Catholic Church should be pressured into going along with routine measures of population control. And again, he's not talking about any voluntary things. You know, we've got to force sterilization of people. And of course, these globalists who are pushing this type of stuff were responsible for the China one-child policy or forced abortions in China, things like that. They were war gaming that to see how that worked.

Same guy. That was 1967. Same guy, two years later, reported by the New York times. Paul Ehrlich says everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989. That's a quote. That's a quote. I mean, that sounds like the Babylon B, but that's a quote from Paul Ehrlich, the sky that they're treating like some kind of a prophet on 60 Minutes today. He said, the trouble with almost all environmental problems, says Paul Ehrlich, the population biologist from Stanford University.

Aren't you impressed? Is that by the time we have enough evidence to convince people you're dead we must realize that unless we're extremely lucky everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years said the 37 year old scientist that's why i call these people climate cassandras right poor paul ehrlich you cause, and when I said that, my son said, well, maybe you shouldn't call them Cassandra's because the curse of Cassandra was that she foresaw the future, but nobody would believe her. And, uh, everybody believes these guys,

even though they can't see the future and we need to show you the past to show you that they can't see the future. But I like to call them Cassandraras because I don't believe them. And they walk around as if nobody believed them. But our entire world is being restructured according to their false prophecies and lies. So the politicians and the media pretend that they believe them. Ice Age by the year 2000. This was done in 1970.

So you think that would be safe enough right um this is not paul ehrlich um this is um uh james pilage who is um a scientist at the atmospheric research um in boulder colorado a government agency. And he was saying that scientists predicted a new age by the 21st century. So 1970 and 30 years, we're going to have an ice age. And this was the mantra when they did the first Earth Day in 1970. I was in high school. I remember it very well. I was laughing at them then, and I'm laughing at them now. Many decades later. very well. Um, I was laughing at them then and I'm laughing at them now, uh,

many decades later. And, uh, so they were all saying it's going to be a new ice age. And they held to that story for about eight or nine years. And then they flipped the script and went to global warming. But the interesting thing about it was from the very first day, they were saying, we've got to ban all the cars and we've got to kill kill all the people and then they went from an ice age and mass famine because of an ice

age to global warming and of course if you have global warming the plants are going to grow better right and if you got more co2 the plants are going to grow better but uh so we got to come up with a different apocalyptic thing oh the ice flows are going to melt and we're all going to grow better, but, uh, so we got to come up with a different apocalyptic thing. Oh, the ice flows are going to melt and we're all going to be underwater. So we got to do all the same things because this is all coming from humans and we just got to shut down all human activity until we can kill all the humans. So 1970 America is subject to water rationing by 1974, food rationing by 1980. This is Paul Ehrlich again.

Paul Ehrlich, outspoken ecologist to speak. He's outspoken and he's going to speak. Giving aspirins to cancer victims is what Dr. Paul Ehrlich thinks of the current proposals for pollution control. It was always about the cars and the people. And it does not need saying, Air Lake predicts that the oceans will be as dead as Lake Erie in less than a decade.

That America will be subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980. 1971, they're still talking about a new ice age that is coming. And again, these are all, you can see this on Steve Malloy's cei.org report. That's where he wrote this article. It was also picked up by Zero Hedge. But then you have NASA scientists in conjunction with Columbia University. I mean, these people are experts.

We should listen to them. They know they're scientists. We're not, right? Listen to the experts. This is what the experts are telling you at NASA. A new ice age is coming. That's what they were saying in 1970, 71 rather. 1972, still holding that.

But now the new ice age was coming by 2070. Now they're starting to get a little bit shaky. Some of these people, right? And they have a letter here in this article that was written by a person who was at the Lamont Dowdry geological observatory written to the president, dear Mr. President. And of course this would be Nixon.

These dire predictions that were sent to him in December of 1972 probably had something to do with him creating the EPA. I don't know the exact date of the EPA being done, but it was this type of fear, propaganda, and alarmism coming from the scientific community was what was used to create the environmental protection agency, uh, which is not about protecting the environment anymore at all.

It's about taking everything away from us. As a matter of fact, one of the guys that I worked with, uh, David Schneier had been a scientist for them from the 1970s, uh, because he saw the things that were really were pollution problems, super fund,

uh, pollution areas and everything. And he, he worked with them to clean stuff up. But then they got on a different mission to shut everything down. And so after 30 years, he resigned and he began opposing them. 1974, new ice age coming fast. And this is coming from NOAA, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration.

1974, Time Magazine, another ice ice age you get the idea it was ubiquitous this is all we heard all the time when i was growing up ice age is coming and um you know it didn't alarm me i was in florida you know i was cool uh that'd be a nice relief i won't have to move to tennessee anyway uh let's go to 1988. Washington, D.C. says, we've got some hot weather coming. We've got several days that are over 90 degrees in Washington, D.C. So prepare for long, hot summers. And this is going to be something that is going to happen all at this point in time, 1988, they have shifted the agenda now to global warming.

But as Steve Malloy points out, the number of hot days in the D.C. area peaked in 1911, and they've been declining ever since. That's what the data shows. 1988, Maldives completely underwater in 30 years. Well, that would have been five years ago now. So five years ago, they said in 1988 that five years ago, the Maldives would be completely underwater, except that the sea level hasn't even risen there. They certainly are not underwater.

1989, rising seas to obliterate nations by the year 2000, according to UN officials. Well, that's about as impressive as you can get when the UN says it, right? The Associated Press, Associated Propaganda, 1989, New York City's West Side Highway, will be underwater by 2019. Very specific. Boy, this is salon. Fake news salon. Jim Hansen, the scientist who in 1988 predicted the greenhouse effect before Congress, which is also a lie. I went over to the window with him and we looked out on Broadway in New York City and he said, if what you're saying about the greenhouse effect is true, is anything going to look different down there in 20 years? He said the West Side Highway, which runs along the Hudson River, will be underwater, he said.

That was his West Side story. I prefer the musical. It's far more entertaining than these lies because these lies are being used to enslave us. This is why I'm going over this. It's a massive amount. I'm not even going to go over everything that they've got in this, but it is a wealth of information.

And if you want to load up on ammunition to shoot at these people, go for it. And, uh, in this, it says, well, um, uh, you will have signs in restaurants saying water by request only, uh, within 20 or 30 years. Remember we had this conversation in 1988 or 89. So he says, remember, remember my prediction. Well, we are remembering that. Uh, does he still believe in these things that they said in 1988, remember my prediction. Well, we are remembering that. Does he still believe in these things that they said in 1988, 89?

Yes. He still believes in everything. I talked to him just a few months ago and he said that he wouldn't change anything about what he said then. Well, there you go. That's Salon. And 2000, we have the predictions. Children will not know what snow is. This is coming from the UK Independent.

They say that, and remember, this is the year 2000, 2001. The University of East Anglia and their climate research unit, these were the people that were at the very center of ClimateGate just a few years on from this. But at this point, they're not been exposed as liars, frauds, people conspiring together to hide their data because their data conflicted and their predictions conflicted with what was happening. That was the basis of the ClimateGate stuff. And we had two of them. We had thousands of emails.

The first one was 1,000 emails. The second one came a couple years later, over 5,000 emails. And it was coming out of the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit. But they said at the time, they didn't say, you know, in a few years, you're going to find out we're all lying to you. No, they said in a few years, winter snowfall will become very rare and an exciting event, and children will not even know what snow is. 2002, famine in 10 years.

That would have been 11 years ago. That was coming from The Guardian, of course, saying why vegans were right all along. Can't have that meat because everything's going to end in 10 years. 2004, Britain to have Siberian climate by 2020. Now the Pentagon tells Bush, climate change will destroy us. No, the Pentagon will destroy us. If you want to know man-made global warming, it's going to be when the Pentagon provokes a nuclear war.

That's the real destruction that is coming, the real man-made global warming. Britain will be plunged into a Siberian climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega droughts, famine, widespread rioting will erupt around the world, they said. A NASA scientist says in 2008, the Arctic will be ice-free by 2018, or maybe 2013, because he said five to 10 years.

Well, it didn't happen in five years, and it didn't happen in 10 years either. Again, this was Hansen. Hansen, echoing work by other scientists, said that in five to ten years, the Arctic will be free of ice in the summer. So that would have been 2018 at the latest. And in this, what I find interesting is that, as I say, Hanson,

former Vice President Gore, and the media have all been trumpeting man-made climate doom since the 1980s, but the Americans are not buying it. But boy, it's being sold and hawked incessantly, hasn't it, by the media. They said, however, Representative Ed Markey of Massachusetts, he was only a congressman at that point in time. That was in 2008. And another five years after that, in 2013 2013 when the Arctic was supposed to be gone, Congressman Ed Markey was holding hearings, and I remember this very well because it was all taking place around where I lived in North Carolina. The EPA has a very big facility in Research Triangle Park, and at that point in time, Steve Malloy, who wrote this article,

discovered that the EPA there in Research Triangle Park was trying to come up with a justification for complete bans of diesel engines. And so they looked for volunteers who had respiratory and heart issues. They took them to the University of North Carolina facilities, and their research facility was in Research Triangle Park. But they worked with UNC. They brought people in who had respiratory illness. They filtered out the carbon monoxide that would kill you. And then they exposed them to levels that were 72 times what the EPA said. And he noticed it because he saw some people being taken to the hospital.

And so they were exposing people to a much higher level than they said was safe, willingly doing that. And so David Schneier and Steve Malloy tried to get this stopped. They tried to get a restraining order from a judge. They said, this is, you know, you're using people and exposing them to stuff that you said is not safe. And they don't know that they're getting exposed to these high levels. But at the same time all this was happening there,

Lisa Jackson, who was head of the EPA, had worked out a little dog and pony show with this guy, Ed Markey, who is now a senator. He's rewarded for these types of lies. And they had a little dialogue worked out back and forth between them. Lisa Jackson, Obama's EPA director, was saying, well, we're not talking about people getting sick from fine particulate matter. We're talking about people dying, aren't we?

Oh, yes, we are, Congressman. She was forced out when it was found that she was using an alias to communicate with people in back channels, you know, kind of like the people at the university of East Anglia climate research center. And Michael Mann, who invented the lie about the hockey stick,

Al Gore warns of an ice free Arctic by 2013, but it's still there. And unfortunately, so is Gore. And so are his lies and the policies that he put in. 2009, Prince Charles says, we've only got eight years to save the planet. Well, that would have been 2017, just 96 months to save the world, he said. In 2009, the UK prime minister said, we've got 50 days, 50 days, not 96 months. Come on,

that's more alarm. 50 days to save the planet from a catastrophe. That was Gordon Brown at the time. 2009, the independent UK Arctic free. Arctic is going to be ice free by 2014. I thought it was 2013 or 18 or whatever. They can't get that right. And of course, none of that was true. None of that happened. This is why it's important that we not play along with their lies. As CEI reports, climate alarmists and their media allies once again made a slew of claims about natural disasters being caused by man-made emissions in 2022. But here are 10 facts of climate disaster claims made by the Associated Press and other media outlets in 2022. And I'm not going to go around with each one of them. I'll just give you some ideas.

I talked about the Pakistan floods. Well, the reality is that the 2022 Monsignor season was within the range of natural variability. They talked about Hurricane Ian. Oh, this is the most destructive hurricane that we've ever had. Again, based on what? Unadjusted dollar figures for damage but it was a very very light unusually light hurricane season but never let the facts get in the way of your alarmism bottom line says steve malloy there's not a single natural disaster there disaster, nor is there any trend of any type of natural disaster that can be credibly linked with emissions or whatever gradual climate change may be occurring for whatever reason. But that doesn't stop them.

They will continue to go on. So we're going to have a multipolar shift with energy and dollar disruptions, says the Mises Institute. That is very easy to predict because now we're talking about a political climate. And that is easy to predict. It was hard to see COVID-9-11 because the medical stuff, again, it takes a while for this. They are telling us what's going to happen.

It's all, I don't know. Is that going to happen? A lot of people afraid of that. A lot of people shutting down churches because they, well, they say this is going to happen. Let's be a little bit on the cautious side or whatever. Uh, but after a few months, you started to see what was happening. It still didn't have a mechanism for it, but we knew in advance what was going to happen because of the politics. And I've been watching this climate change.

We've got 55 years of documented lies. And we know what is not going to happen. But we know that they're going to continue with this as if it were true. In the same way they're going to ignore people dropping dead in front of your eyes, they're going to ignore how their lives have fallen to the ground. We'll be right back. me Thank you. Analyzing the Globalist's Next Move And now, The David Nutt Show Thank you to some of the people who have left tips. Thank you very much, Rhonda Tate. I appreciate that.

Appreciate the help. Carlos Rex, thank you. Brian Pitts, thank you as well. Says, have you ever done a piece on harp? the help. Uh, Carlos Rex. Thank you. Uh, Brian Pitts. Thank you as well. It says, uh, have you ever done a piece on harp? And of course, um,

you know, that's the, uh, high frequency array that they have. Uh, and, he said the history channel did a good piece on it a few years ago, titled weather warfare.

Yeah. We know that there is a lot of geoengineering of the weather, uh, in many different ways. I've not reported on harp, uh, that much, but, uh, yes, that is one aspect of it. Many people have been suspicious that it has caused not just weather modifications,

but even disruptions that would cause earthquakes. But I remember there was a project that was called Skyder Alert. They had an app. You saw a bunch of crisscrossing persistent contrails. You could take a picture of it, send it to them. So it'd be timestamped. And they started doing,

um, uh, they started correlating the data and they could correlate this crisscrossing of these persistent contrails to increases in temperature. So that's one way that you can make global warming happen, right? And so I don't know if that is still out there. They did a documentary. That's how I came across that app.

Well, let's talk about, we were just talking about these predictions 55 years ago. There was one that came out on New Year's from Fox News. What life was like 50 years ago in America compared to now in 2023? Well, yeah, I have a lot of fondness for 1973. That was the year that Karen and I met. We've got the 50th anniversary of our first date coming up on St. Patrick's Day. At the start of 1973, the top song in the U.S. was You're So Vain by Carly Simon.

Now, we just have auto-tuning. We don't even have any people singing. Whether you like that song or not, we don't have any people singing. was your so vain by Carly Simon. Now we just have auto tuning. We don't even have any people singing, whether you like that song or not. We don't have any people singing shag, haircuts, bell bottoms, all the rest of the stuff.

Um, uh, I'm fine to see all that stuff go the way of sky lab, uh, which also was launched. Then best picture was the godfather. One of our first dates. Uh, so 50 years later,

uh, we don't have a best picture we don't even have good pictures the movies they're just propaganda and uh degenerate uh propaganda that gas prices well before we get to the gas prices average movie ticket price, I looked this up, 1973, $1.72. You want to talk about the effects of the Federal Reserve and inflation? $1.72 was the average price to go to the movies in 1973. In 2022, $11. Gas prices, though, were the ones that really went up. I mean, that's a factor of about six times increase in the price of a movie ticket.

And I guess if you factored in quality, have you seen anything in the quality of The Godfather come out lately? Not me. But, you know, so you could factor that into the value part of the equation, I guess. But gas prices, 1973, 39 cents per gallon. Uh, now three 99 per gallon was the national average said Fox news. The time they did this, that's about a factor of 10 on that. When we look at median income again, about a factor of six, uh, the, um, it was $12,000 in 1973, uh, $70,784 in 2022.

And, you know, we see a similar thing happening to the price of homes. Price of homes actually went up more than anything. Price of homes had gone up more than gasoline has. You know, the price of movie tickets and your income have gone up by a factor of six. However, gas has gone up by a factor of 10. And the cost, the median cost of a home, and again, they talk about median because that avoids any kinds of distortions that you get with an average. When you've got somebody that's got a super expensive home or a super cheap home, that's going to affect that average number. But median just says, what is the point at which half of the homes are

more expensive than this and half of them are cheaper than this? Well, in 1973, the median price was just under $30,000, $29,900. Now it is $471,200, says Fox News, according to Census Bureau data released on Friday, December the 23rd. And so that's a factor of 16 times. So even though our income has gone up by a factor of six measured in the volatile fiat currency, our incomes have gone up by a factor of six, but the price of housing has gone up by a factor of 16 and the price of gas has gone up by a factor of 10.

Of course, 1973 was also the year of Roe v. Wade, of the Watergate trial. I would have thought that that had happened earlier. I mean, we just, it seemed like that was, and of course, Vietnam War officially ended. They withdrew the last ground troops in South Vietnam, August 11th, 1972, right after I graduated from high school.

I missed the Vietnam war by that much. Uh, so, um, you know, they ended at 1972, but of course, you know, again, uh, we were all going to starve. So we had to, we had to prepare for that. No, nobody believed Paul Ehrlich then nobody. Well, I had a good friend who did. I got to say that, uh, that was something I always went back and forth with. But where are we today?

You know, 1970, they were imposing that first Earth Day. We got to save the planet. We got to ban all the cars. Well, we now have the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab saying, people have no right to own their own cars. Quote, you can walk or you can share, but we'll own everything. You'll have nothing, especially a car.

You have no right to anything, says this guy, Klaus Schwab. When's he going to get a punch in the nose? He's got a plan to enslave all of us, to impoverish all of us. Somebody needs to reset that plan. So yeah, forget about the price of gas. This little man has demands and says you have no rights. Who elected you? It is a vast conspiracy and he is at the center of it.

He is the front man right now. I would say even more so than Bill Gates. Klaus Schwab has declared that people have no right to own their own car. Instead, you can walk or share. That's what he said. Far too many people own their own vehicles. And this situation must be corrected by pricing us out of the market. That is what this is all about.

And by making things extremely rare. Right? Not only are electric vehicles going to be more expensive. Why? Because you got too many people chasing too few goods. They don't have the raw materials to make all of these cars. That's the bottleneck. There are automobile manufacturing plants to make

electric vehicles and battery manufacturing plants that are springing up all over the place, but where are you going to get the cobalt? The cobalt is controlled by the Democratic Republic of Congo, which is not too democratic, actually. It's more like our Democrat party. And they control cobalt. And they're looking at ways to extend their control. Who's number two in cobalt? Russia. Where are we going to get the minerals for all this stuff?

Even if we didn't have issues with the political issues, there's not sufficient known resources to do all of this stuff. It's not just cobalt. It's other things like nickel and other things like that. We can build all the factories that we want, but we can't build these batteries in electric cars without the minerals that they don't know where they are. Lithium, same story with lithium for the lithium batteries.

And so that's going to price us out of the market. They're going to starve us for resources by their centrally controlled electric grid. And Biden is doing everything he can to make this happen as quickly as he can. Well, this next week or so, you're going to have thousands of private jets flying into Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum, annual forum that happens in January. They're out there telling you that you have no right to a car. They will have everything.

You'll have nothing. Are we really going to stand still for this? Are we really going to quietly go into this dark age? I just find it hard to believe. Where do we find the will and the public awareness to stand up to this? Yes, people are going to eventually realize what is happening as they're starting to wake up about the vaccines, but we could wait too long for this. Communal sharing of cars must become a part

of the, quote, circular approach, unquote, in order to reduce global demand for precious metals and for fossil fuels. So now Davos is instructing their young global leaders that are embedded everywhere around the world. And again, that may include people like this guy, you know, Kevin McCarthy. Yeah, he's on their website. That's his picture.

They're on World Economic Forum website. That far too many people own private vehicles and they've got to be priced out of the market. To quote the World Economic Forum, the average car or van in England is driven just 4% of the time. This means that people in developed countries, including the United States, should not have the right to own their own car. Comments, news punch. But going back to the World Economic Forum, they said car-sharing platforms such as GetAround and BlueSG, these would be car sharing platforms in the UK, have already seized the opportunity to offer vehicles where you pay per hour used. That's what Eric Peters and I have been saying for the longest time. The automobile companies are fine with this because they like to, you know,

it's more profitable for them to lease you a car than it is for them to sell you a car. And it's more profitable for them to rent it to you by the hour than it is for them to lease it to you. They just want to make sure that they're one or two, that the either one or two or three companies that are going to be allowed to have cars to lease out there. This is the way the government takes over individual automobiles, because if they own all

public transportation, they control you. They control your every movement. You're in a prison. That's why mobility is so fundamental to all of this. But the most fundamental thing is speech. The end of private ownership is essential, they say, according to the World Economic Forum. Quote, a design process that focuses on fulfilling the underlying need instead of designing for product purchasing is fundamental to this transition. This is the mindset needed to redesign cities, to reduce private vehicles. Klaus Schwab is claiming current prices are severely underpriced. He said, first, leading democracies should agree to end the underpricing of fossil fuels, except exactly the opposite is happening. They're adding all kinds of penalties and taxes and carbon taxes

and all the rest of this stuff. He says the leading democracies of the G20 should collectively commit to phasing out the cost and tax breaks for the production and consumption of fossil fuels. That's exactly the opposite. They're giving tax breaks and incentives for the competing products, and they're adding penalties and fees to the fossil fuels. But he presents it exactly the opposite. It's a total lie. It's a total inversion of reality.

He says, and so we need to phase out these subsidies for fossil fuels. And we need to cover, so we can cover the cost of local air pollution and global warming. And so that we can help sustainable economies. We need to subsidize the green stuff. Oh, wait, you're already doing that. That's where we are we need to oppose that fundamental lie because it is the foundation of everything they're trying to impose on us including cbdc thank you for listening The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.

They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you.