The David Knight Show - 5Jul23 Nuclear False Flag? Biden Wants Chemtrails, "Hospital Death Protocol", RFKj Explains His Call for Climate Deniers to be Jailed

Episode Date: July 5, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Tranny BLM supporter takes black lives in Philadelphia shooting and 27 states now have Constitutional Carry (2:07) Amish death rate 90 TIMES less than rest of the country — and no one has autism (16:38) UFC fighter Anthony "Lionheart" Smith speaks on Trump jab that killed his mother and gave him blood clots (25:53) Billboards of Truth about "Hospital Death Protocol" A "Bereaved Army" of relatives of those murdered by federal financially incentivized malpractice during the "pandemic" begin a billboard campaign to inform the public (30:09) False Flag for Nuclear War? Ukraine & Russia BOTH say the other is about to attack Europe's largest nuclear reactor to start a nuclear war. An anonymous post by someone claiming to work for feds is even more explicit (47:50) From George III to 3-Letter Agencies "Regulation Without Representation" (and also taxation without representation). Why the bureaucratic state is WORSE than the unelected, unaccountable monarch our forefathers fought. Then there's the "liberals" who want to redefine "pursuit of happiness" into "pursuit of gay/LGBT" (1:00:52) AP (Associated Press) tries its hand at redefining "patriot" as an evil term and ignoring where the word comes from (1:12:45) 20% of Americans literally know nothing about the most basic things of our government — like the name of the National Anthem and the National Archives puts a woke trigger warning on Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence (1:17:34) Washington "Never Told a Lie". Now We Want a Liar "Who Can Win"From George Washington to George Santos. The corruption in America is also coming from "We the People" who care nothing about truth or character. We want our guy to win no matter what it takes to settle the score with our enemies (1:25:29) Cocaine in the White House! Imagine my surprise (1:38:49) RFKj and the Reason interview — FINALLY, an answer to RFKj's attack on the free speech of those who disagreed with him on climate change (1:45:05) Geoengineering and Chemtrails — Biden and EU finally admit the "conspiracy" isn't a theory (1:58:36) INTERVIEW - Soros' Rogue Prosecutors Desc: What have Soros' prosecutors done to destroy cities, what is their agenda, and how you can spot them. Author Zach Smith, "Rogue Prosecutors: How Radical Soros Lawyers Are Destroying America's Communities" (2:03:23) Florida legal battles as the Governor wins in state supreme court over Democrat State Attorney who DeSantis fired because he said he wouldn't enforce any laws about abortion or mutilation of children. Meanwhile, Disney tries to bring the feds into a state dispute (2:35:06) Mainstream media tries to tell us 15-minute cities are not about restricting movement, cars are not being banned and fears of Climate MacGuffin being used against us like Covid MacGuffin is a conspiracy theory (2:53:04)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

www.thezeitgeistmovement.com Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 5th of July, year of our Lord, 2023. Well, today we finally have an answer from RFK Jr. about the censorship issue. Who does he lock up? Who does he want to give the death penalty to?

And it's kind of interesting. We'll talk about this. But we're also going to talk about some other things that are coming out and i didn't get to it yesterday but of course over the weekend we had the white house admitting that it wants to do geoengineering they go straight from it's a conspiracy theory to yeah we've been doing it for a while we got an acronym for it and we want to do more of it meanwhile the un is very upset, saying that who gets to set the thermostat? And we have a group that is pushing back very hard on what I've always called financially incentivized medical malpractice,

the other massive killer that Trump unleashed on us besides his jab. But stay with us. We're going to begin with the Second Amendment and a mass shooting by an interesting suspect. We'll be right back. Well, we had a couple of mass shootings, but the big one was in Philadelphia. There was one in Texas. I still haven't found out much information about that. I think it's three people killed in that.

We have five people dead in Philadelphia, killed by Black Lives Matter activists, who I believe all the victims were black as far as I can tell. Just went through the neighborhood, put on some body armor, got a rifle, got a pistol, extra magazines, and a police scanner, and just started shooting people. Shot dead five men and targeted two children. He didn't kill them. He shot them multiple times in the legs. One of them just two years old. This is a very sick person, 40 years old, Black Lives Matter activist. And the victim's age is between 15 and 59. Let me show you what this guy looks like. Yeah. A guy.

Kind of a strange smile he's got. I wonder if there's been some plastic surgery with that or what is going on. This guy is a tranny. This guy. But you know, the problem is not crazy people with guns. Everybody wants to talk about red flags. Maybe we could red flag the trannies. Uh, somebody who is that detached from reality.

Uh, but of course, that's not the problem. The problem is that you and I have guns. It's not a problem that he's got guns on his Facebook page. Uh, that picture that you just saw of him, uh,

wearing a bra and woman's top and earrings. So this hair braided, uh, back in March, three months ago, uh, police said, uh, that, um, again, he chased, um, he shot four men on the street just at random. Apparently, like I said, 15 to 59, he didn't, doesn't appear to know them, but I believe that they are all black and he had, um, supported black lives matter. He supported workers who protested and strike for black lives in July of 2020. And now he's striking down black lives. These people are absolutely insane, insane, and so many different ways.

Uh, so four people, four men shot on the street at random, a fifth man was chased into his home and killed in his home by this guy. And then a two-year-old boy was shot four times in the leg. A 13-year-old boy was shot in the legs. And so we asked the question, what is the problem here? Is it A, guns? Is it B, crazy people like this trans? Is it C, people who are driven crazy by pharmaceutical drugs like SSRIs and things like that? Well, the libs would answer A, it's the guns. The guns are the problem. It's not any of these other issues.

We've got to take them away from rational people who use them to protect themselves. As a matter of fact, one of the things that he posted on Facebook as people look through social media, he posted a story titled, how do you know if an evil spirit is following you? Well, this might be one of the signs if you're doing something like this. Perhaps you've been imbibing with a pharmakia that has driven you mad or perhaps driven you to some dark influencers. And so you see this happening over and over again. As I said, three people dead, eight injured in Fort Worth. No information yet about that shooting.

But here's an example. A 71-year-old man who uses a katana in self-defense against a burglar, a Japanese sword, samurai sword. The right to keep and bear arms is generally held to be talking about things like guns, says Tom Knighton of Bearing Arms. In fairness, those are the things that people are most trying to ban and the things that are best suited for self-defense. But the phrase arms includes pretty much any weapon.

It might even include airsoft guns if they were of any protective value, but the Consumer Protection Board wants to ban airsoft guns, even though you can't. Anyway, getting back to this particular story. Fortunately, he said, we don't have a lot of sword control here in the U.S. So a 71-year-old Seattle homeowner use a samurai sword to defend himself against a pitch fork wielding burglar. Yeah. Because we're talking about Seattle. That's probably some homeless person with a pitchfork, uh, broken into his house over the weekend. Uh, the police responded. They saw the victim

still holding a samurai sword. He had visible injuries. A 71 year old man dead while the other man had a stab wound to his torso. According to the police, uh, that seemed to do the trick. We said, uh, or said that the victim said he was in my, inside my house and he attacked me with a pitchfork i grabbed a samurai sword and i defended myself with the samurai sword and so tom knighton says well some might argue that he should have had a gun because that's the best option for self-defense but he did have a firearm

and the pistol was plan a unfortunately it jammed and he had to improvise. So plan B was to grab his sword. This is why plan A should be a revolver, in my opinion. That was what I was told when I took my firearms class by a guy who was retired Secret Service. He says, you know, when things get crazy, you lose a lot of IQ points. You don't want to have anything that is complicated unless you're going to train on it all the time, all the time. You know, just second nature to you. And you understand the limits of the thing and what to do if it jams or whatever. Otherwise, keep it simple with a revolver. I think that's good advice for everybody. That should be your plan you know plan b can be a samurai sword keep it on you at all times i wonder what the open carry

rules are for samurai swords you got any idea travis i know they have certain limits on the length of your knives but hey that's a knife not a sword and i'm not entirely sure i know in texas uh like you said, there are restrictions on length of knives, or there were. Yeah, I don't know if they changed that or not. Anyway, the good news is that when it comes to open carry of guns,

it's now the majority of states that have constitutional carry. You had Florida and Nebraska become the 26th and 27th state to pass constitutional carry. You had Florida and Nebraska become the 26th and 27th state to pass constitutional carry. And there were already 25 states where that was the case. Just as our founding fathers intended. That's right.

Those two states will not be the last ones to pass permitless carry bills either, says Gun Owners of America. There are several different bills at different stages of the legislative process in multiple states nationwide. And they point out, let's not forget that it was just a mere 15 years ago that the Second Amendment was not considered to be an individual right by the courts. It always was. There was never any question about it. I remember one of our employees, a really good kid. Um, he was a salutatorian, which meant that he had the second highest grade point average. They were about to flunk him out because he got genuinely

sick and had very strict rules about attendance. And if you missed a certain number of days, they're going to flunk you out. Even if you have the highest GPA of anybody in the, in the school, but, um, he had learned his lessons very well and he believed everything that teachers taught him. And he was working for us and the video school store. We, we got to know him because he was a skateboarder and the police was trying to, uh, hassle him about stuff. And so when we saw the police out there one to hassle him about stuff. And so when we saw the police out there one day, we go out the back door and say, come on in, the police are out front.

They're going to get you. And so he was already, his family was already a customer of ours, and so we got to know him pretty well. Anyway, the lessons that they were teaching him in school was that the Second Amendment was about the National Guard. And he absolutely believed that because he'd been told that in school. We had long discussions about that. But it's not really much to say. I mean, you look at it and you understand that the first eight bills of rights

are all about individual things that the government cannot take away from us. Because as we know from the Declaration of Independence, our rights are God-given. And those were eight prohibitions of the federal government from taking any of those things away from us. And states don't have rights. They have powers. And so the last, you know, 9th and 10th Amendment, you could say, are about the preserving the powers of the states and also the powers of we the people. Let's not forget that. And so, but yeah, they were all about individual rights.

You know, the protection of free speech, free exercise of religion, that's not about the state. That's not about any state organization. That's about individuals, of course. All of them were. Due process, protection against excessive fines, all the rest of this stuff. It was absurd. See, I don't need a court to interpret something for me that's written in English. English is my native language, by the way.

And you can also find a lot of commentary by the people who authored it as to what their intended purpose was and the rational reasons for putting it there. So it was a prevarication by the court, which has now been swept away. And that was the case though, up until 15 years ago, that the courts pretended that this was not an individual right, even though the documents clearly state it. It was the right of the people. You don't even have to try to put that in context. The actual text itself makes that clear. If we look further back in the 1980s, said gun owners of America,

there was only one constitutional carry state. Vermont. Bernie Sanders state. There's a cognitive dissonance there. They just have a hard time understanding. I know. But anyway, in addition, very few states would even allow carrying a gun with a permit. And then we had the Heller decision, 2008.

And that decision, the Washington District of Columbia, District of Criminals, District of Corruption, decided that Heller, who was a police officer, should not be allowed to carry a gun when he's off duty. He can't be trusted. Forget about trusting the citizens. We don't even trust our police officers here. So that got fixed. And, you know, this is one of the reasons why RFK Jr. is saying, well, you know, when we talk about gun control, let's understand we've had an expansive interpretation of this. And we're not going to be able to get rid of these things that easily. Well, it wasn't an expansive interpretation. It's just going back to the

constitution. And he still says, well, we're going, yeah, I would sign a ban. I would sign a ban on assault weapons or anything that we could get a consensus on. In other words, um, he doesn't believe in the constitution because it's not getting a consensus of Congress. It's about if you want to change the Second Amendment, you've got to change the Second Amendment. You can't invalidate it with Supreme Court decisions, and you can't invalidate it with laws that you pass. The Constitution is above all of that. What you do is you invalidate your authority to govern,

showing that you are unfaithful to your oath to uphold the Constitution. So when we look at what is happening, there's one final comment from gun owners of America about this. Going back to 1776, they point out from 1768 to 1775, the British began a policy to disarm American citizens. In 1777, William Knox, the Undersecretary of State in the British Colonial Office, advocated for the policy by writing, the arms of all of the people should be taken away,

and every piece of ordnance, ammunition, removed and put into the king's stores, nor should any foundry or manufactory of arms, gunpowder, or warlike stores be ever suffered in America. In other words, they're not going to have any manufacturers of arms, gunpowder, or warlike stores be ever suffered in America. In other words, they're not going to have any manufacturers of ammunition, no manufacturers of firearms, nor should any gunpowder, lead, arms, or ordnance be imported without a license. They will have little need for such things in the future as the king's troops, ships, and forts will be sufficient to protect them from any danger.

As Gun Owners of America says, he sounds a lot like the anti-gun politicians of today. If you go back to the French and Indian War, which is when the British and American colonists fought the French and the Indians, the British needed the American colonists to win. It was kind of an advanced training exercise, if you want to look at it from God's perspective, for the men who would then fight the British in 1776. Yeah, it was about the people who brought their own firearms with them and could manufacture their own bullets, their own lead, as well as knew how to make their own gunpowder. We'll be right back. Thank you. Sous-titres par LaVacheSquid Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, on Rumble, thank you, Brad.

Brian, appreciate that. Brad Brian, 325. Appreciate the tip. He says, sorry, haven't donated in a while. Would you be willing to do an interview with Jay Dyer? I think it'd be a great interview between the two of you. I was just asking Travis during the break about that, and he said he reached out to him on, was it social media, you'd say Gab or something? Yeah, I sent him a message on Gab. He never responded,

but also it's very possible he doesn't check his Gab messages. Yeah, we'll have to try to get a hold of him in a different way. Probably would be interesting to talk to him. So thank you for reminding us of that again. We'll follow through on on it this is something i've talked about before steve kirsch talked about this the amish let's take a look at the how did they survive the most deadly pandemic in the history of mankind we've never had a situation in the history of mankind where the entire world has locked away healthy people to prevent them from catching a cold. And we never had a situation where an experimental genetic code injection was demanded of people worldwide in order to live their life. And so he looks at the Amish, he looks at the autism rate there,

which is essentially zero. And he looks at the Amish, he looks at the autism rate there, which is essentially zero, and he looks at the death rate. And I wanted to bring this up again because the ratio that he calculates here is astounding. He calculates that the unvaxxed Amish death rates, these are people who didn't get the vaccine, 90 times lower than the rest of America. We're talking about nearly 100 times. We're talking about essentially two orders of magnitude that Americans who are taking the prescribed leeches and mercury and the rest of this stuff from the big pharmaceutical

companies. The only difference between these pharmaceutical companies and the doctors of colonial times is the malice and greed. That's the only difference. And I think that they're not ignorant. I think they know. That's why I say malice. The main difference between the death rates of the Amish and the rest of the country is that they completely ignored all of the advice of the government.

Trump's government, the CDC, and the rest of this. Amish families did not get vaccinated. Amish families did not wear masks that Trump and Fauci told everybody to wear. They didn't engage in lockdown. They didn't engage in social distancing or any other types of restrictions. As a matter of fact, as I said before, I think we had some Mennonites. So we got to know in, um, in, uh, Texas, uh, just happened to run into them or actually he ran into us a little bit.

It's minor damage in a car accident. And so, uh, you know, we talked to him about that. So we can work something out. Um, you know, just, um, uh, just work it out. We found out that he was doing, you know, yard work and things like that. We needed done. We needed, uh, some leveling of some, uh, ground and, uh, some trees removed. So I said, yeah, just do some of that that we'll just call it even and um the guy had a great work ethic and so did an older gentleman that came with him who uh had a the small uh bobcat right bobcat thank you thank you couldn't think of the bobcat name anyway

he had a bobcat and that that was his thing i mean he would just sit on that thing and just work relentlessly with that bobcat and he had a little amish beard you know chin strap beard and all that kind of stuff they were great guys but um you know we talked to the younger guy a bit and um he invited us in the midst of this lockdown stuff to an ice cream social they were having. It's like, yes, you guys. They didn't play any of the lockdown rules, no mask, no nothing. And they get their heads on straight, let me tell you. Lancaster has the world's largest single community of Amish people with over 45,000 people.

Steve Kirsch described talking with a family of the only Amish man in Lancaster who allegedly died from COVID. Speaking to the family, he found out that they actually didn't know if he had died from the virus because this claim was made by the hospital where he died. And we're going to talk about that. The COVID hospital protocols. Maybe he died from those hospital protocols, said Kirsch. He said he'd heard that five Amish people had died from COVID, but he was unable to find any information on them, and he couldn't confirm their identities or their deaths.

But he said he did the calculation based on that assumption that he was able to confirm the identity of five people. So assuming that there's five people, which he couldn't find or any information about them or any relatives who knew they died, but he heard through the grapevine that as many as five people had died during this pandemic from these things. And so he said he did the calculation. So they died at a rate that was 90 times lower than the infection fatality rate across the United States, two orders of magnitude,

because they didn't follow a single guideline of the CDC. And he also noted that researchers were unable to find an autistic kid who was unvaccinated in the Amish communities. He said diseases like ADD and autoimmune disease and epilepsy simply don't exist among Amish children. He said the federal government has studied Amish communities for decades without releasing a public report. He alleged that the publishing such information would be devastating to the CDC and it would expose their recommendations as harmful to Americans. I retweeted,

I was going to put it on here, I forgot to put it on the board. It's a picture of a kid in a silhouette and it was needles going up and down both arms and both legs, labeled with all the different vaccinations that they have. And it wasn't all of them. There's, I think, several dozen. But it's just amazing how much we're doing to Americans in terms of standardized vaccination. And nobody really wants to talk about it.

Here's a priest. He was studying to be a Catholic priest, rather. He didn't make it because he got vaccines. He got two COVID jabs and it put him in a wheelchair. Now, like I talked about the international bodybuilding guy at 8 million followers worldwide. He got four shots and it put him in the grave. And he knew it was that a few weeks before he died.

He went on a podcast. He said, I've been having these issues. And I went to a doctor and he did a D-dimer test. He found all these microclots. And he tried to purify my blood and everything. He said it was a horrible process. Basically take all your blood out, run it through a filter, and then back into it. He said, I did it twice.

The doctor said, if you don't do this, it's going to kill you. Well, it killed him anyway. Because this is not something that is easily filtered out. So, even a bodybuilder, even somebody who's absolutely focused on his health like that, fell for this. Massive propaganda, massive peer pressure and other pressure, professional pressure and all the rest of the stuff. I don't know what pushed him into doing this. He even said it was against his better judgment. So I don't know what happened but he went uh you know from being a bodybuilder

i picked the trump shot and it destroyed his body destroyed his body and same thing with this guy who was studying to be a catholic priest now he's in a wheelchair a ufc fighter reports blood clots after the covet shot says that it killed his mom as well. He says they just keep it hush hush because nobody wants to say it out loud. Much more is known about the dangers of the COVID shots. Actually not vaccines, but genetic therapy says WND. I've called it the GCIs for a long time. Genetic code injections.

But of course this is coming from WND. They're talking about how horrible this is. How's genetic therapy? And just like many of their contributors, like Wayne Allenroot, they despise the vaccine, but they love the father of the vaccine who cheers himself for doing his best accomplishment and how many millions of lives he has saved right uh so um joel hirshhorn they even cited him who he also writes for wnd as well as on substack i've had

joel on many times he's got a book called pandemic blunder i think that's the title of his substack he said um it can also trigger leukemia. Physicians in Taiwan diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia occurring directly after the patient received Moderna's jab, booster jab January 3rd, 2023. Turns out that the 43-year-old had a total of six exposures over the past year and a half. Six jabs. Jabbing us to death.

You could say he died of multiple stabs from Trump and his shots. And of course, we all know about the heart damage and the blood clots and all the rest of this stuff. But the UFC fighter said, his name is Anthony Lionheart Smith, publicly announced his stance against the COVID vaccines. He said his mother fell into a coma two weeks after receiving the Pfizer booster shot

and never recovered. He claims that he developed a blood clot shortly after his vaccination. The report said that he shared his experience during an interview on Believe You Me, also on screen, as former UFC middleweight champion Michael Beisping. The conversation included COVID and vaccines. So he says, you know, we got all these young people, excellent shape, having heart attacks. He says, yeah.

He says, I mean, anytime there's a young person that has that kind of heart problem or strokes or things like that, I kind of point one direction. Go straight to the vaccination every time, said Smith. And they talked about his mother. When my mom passed, she got sick immediately after getting her booster. She was fairly healthy, but she got sick immediately after that. Got her booster and was in a coma in like two weeks. It doesn't make any sense. It's all really weird, right?

And then recently Pfizer came out and said people over 60 in their final booster had to come out and said that they were a higher risk of stroke. Well, that's essentially what happened to my mom. So they're now admitting that as a risk factor? What for? I mean, they're protected in terms of liability. He also cited the case of Damar Hamlin, the Buffalo Bills player

who collapsed on the field. He said, I believe that that was something that they tried to hush up. And of course, it absolutely was. And it was a shame that he didn't take the opportunity to warn other people. But I want to talk about this.

This is from a person, a writer, Stella Paul, and that is a pen name. She describes herself as a writer in New York who has covered medical issues for over a decade. In 2021, she lost her husband in a locked-down nursing home in New York City where he'd been brutally isolated for almost a year. He died one week after getting the vaccine. She is focused on exposing the hospital death protocol.

That's what it is. I call it financially incentivized medical malpractice, but it was designed to kill people. Everything that Trump and Fauci did was designed to kill people. It was a program of mass murder by government, democide. It is about depopulation. It's about the 2030 agenda. All of that stuff is about depopulation and sterilization.

So she says she's focused on exposing the hospital death protocol to honor her husband's memory and to support thousands of bereaving families so what are they doing they have an organization and she is interviewing the person who is the state chair of the New Jersey part of this organization. The organization is called Former Feds Freedom Foundation. And they're in the process of trying to draw people's attention to this, and they discovered that they could take out billboards. They're raising money for billboards. And so in Ridgefield, New Jersey, you may notice history being made. The first billboard of a statewide campaign is now up on Route 1,

highlighting the deadly hospital protocols during COVID that took thousands of innocent lives. And more billboards should be coming soon. So Stella Paul, the pseudonym that she's using, says, I've been writing about the hospital death protocol for some time, explaining how the federal government. Isn't it interesting? See, this is on an American thinker, which is always very conservative and always very Trumpish.

Isn't it interesting that when they talk about horrible things that were done under Biden, it's always Biden that did it. When they talk about things that were horrible that Trump did, that he still takes credit for, they still boasts about. Whenever they talk about that, they always say the federal government did it. See, the evil that Trump did, the evil that Trump presided over, oh no, the buck doesn't stop with him. He doesn't have any responsibility for anything bad, but he gets the credit for everything that's good. You understand?

Those are the Trump rules. Those are the MAGA rules. But, you know, Trump has made that clear. That's the way he is to be treated, and they bow in reverence to him. No, it wasn't the federal government. It was the Trump administration and the Biden administration. Let's call it like it is. I am so sick of these. This is one of the reasons.

You want to know why I focus on Trump so much? Not just because he's evil. Not just because he's incompetent. Not just because he's an evil narcissist. But because I'm so angry at these people who cover for him, who brag about the fact that he committed crimes. And that's why we like him. It's amazing to me.

I've got a clip. People saying that, South Carolina. I've got an article, Darren Beattie, saying that on Revolver. That's his feather in his cap, that they've charged him with crimes. No, he's just a petty criminal. He's just a criminal billionaire. There's lots of those around, in case you haven't noticed. It's kind of the exception to the rule when they're not. It's usually how they get their billions with the crimes. But getting back to this and his response, the federal government, no, the Trump administration, paid big bonuses to hospitals if they treated patients

with the lethal drug remdesivir. Fauci's drug, by the way. Then ventilated and killed them. How many times did you see Trump boasting about the ventilators? Threatening General Motors because they didn't produce enough of these things quickly enough. Peter Navarro doing that as well. I'm disgusted with all those people. You should be as well.

They all need to be in prison. So bring it on. Jack Smith, I think he's, you know, coming after him for things that, uh, probably, uh, many things that should be a crime, but that are a crime that he did commit, but not coming after him for the crimes that they also committed. Many people now know about damage from the vaccine mandates and from the lockdowns, but news about the medical carnage in hospitals has been very sparse. When did I first start talking about this? I remember when I saw it and it hit me like a lightning bolt. It was in August of 2020.

And I saw the American Hospital Association, the AHA. And it was an aha moment for me. Like, aha, there we go. Smoking gun, the American matter, the American hospital association was complaining to CMS. That is the government agency that provides the Medicare and Medicaid funding. And they said to CMS, you told us that you didn't have the tests and you said that they didn't work anyway. And you told us to do a clinical diagnosis of COVID patients. And you told us that you would give us $13,000 plus a 20% bonus for anybody that we clinically diagnosed. Now you're saying after five or six months of this, let's say five months, five months. Now you're saying after five or six months of this, we'll say five months, five months.

Now you're saying after five months of this, that we got to produce the test or you're not going to pay us the bounty for the people that we killed, put on ventilators and all the rest of this stuff. Oh, the ventilators. That was another $39,000. First time you put them on there,

a bonus of 39,000. Why would the federal government ever give somebody a bonus for putting somebody on a ventilator? They give them the ventilators. Even if they paid for them, they're like $50,000. And by the time they say, that person's got COVID, put them on a ventilator. They've made $52,000. And then they charge them every day for the use of it. And then they add another 20 day for the use of it. And then they add another 20%

bonus on top of that. And so CMS, you're not going to pay us for this. We had a deal. Yeah, there's no honor among thieves and murderers, is there? When I saw that, it was just amazing to me. And I've been talking about that ever since. So I'm glad that somebody is setting up an organization to start talking about, this is the title of this article, the depravity of the hospital protocol. And it is depravity. So yeah, they've talked about the lockdowns. They've talked about the vaccines. They've talked about the vaccine mandates.

But they haven't talked about the, what I call it, financially incentivized medical malpractice. People are bribed to kill. Bribed to kill. Fortunately, a group of volunteers is determined to get the word out. I think of them as the bereaved army. These are people who lost a parent or a spouse or a sibling or a child to what one eyewitness doctor called, quote,

organized homicide. That's the Trump administration, folks. Organized homicide. Democide. Death by government. And they won't stop fighting until they get justice. This is how it begins, and it's starting to begin now. At the same time, we've got to keep one eye to the past, and we've got to keep one eye to the future.

Because you understand these people are coming back at us again, and you understand that they're going to be pulling some kind of false flag thing on us, and they're going to be trying to lock us down into what they have been salivating over for decades, the 2030 agenda. It used to be called a UN Agenda 21. So anyway, she says, I spoke to Charlene Delfico, state chair of the New Jersey chapter of former Fed's Freedom Foundation. They organized the billboard campaign.

She said, I lost my stepdad to the death protocol in Virtua R lady of lord's hospital in camden new jersey my mother was admitted at the same time she survived 30 days of brutal torture and i guess it was um you know we don't want to call it torture right we want to call it enhanced medical treatment you know kind of kind of like what they called the torture that CIA did. It was enhanced interrogation. Well, this is enhanced medical treatment. It's not torture. No, it's torture. Killing people. Killing them in isolation. Killing them in isolation so their family

doesn't see what's being done to them. Medically kidnapping and killing. All of these things are charges that should be brought against these private hospitals as well as Trump and Fauci and the CDC people and the FDA people. She survived 30 days of brutal torture and came home unable to move or even to talk. She is slowly recovering, but they put my stepdad on a ventilator, ran roughshod over him until he died. In her grief, she found her way to former Fed's Freedom Foundation, a nationwide group of people who lost loved ones to the hospital protocol. A few survivors of the protocol participate as well, but not many,

because most of the people who were the victims of this didn't make it, or they're so injured by it that they can't do anything. Most of the people were forced into this federally subsidized treatment, quote-unquote, did not survive. We're creating the COVID-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project, and they've got a website for that. chbmp.org, a living record of what happened. We gather videos and written testimonies and documentation for history,

and we're working to get justice for our murdered loved ones and to make sure that other people never have to go through what they did. Well, I hope it works. Now, I've interviewed a couple of times the people from ssstories.net. And they've collected over 7,000 people who have committed suicide

or committed murder and then committed suicide, other things like that. But nothing seems to ever happen to the big pharmaceutical companies because they own the politicians and they own the media. But we need to shout this. What is spoken to you in quiet? Whisper to you in secret. Shout it from the rooftops. Don't be intimidated by the government.

Don't be intimidated by Google or Facebook or Twitter or any of these people. You need to get out there and shout about this murder from the rooftops. In biblical times, that's what they would do. People would hang out on their roof. They'd have small houses. They had a roof, and they could go up there and sit and talk and sometimes talk. Because other people are other people in other houses because they're also up there on their roof. So you shout it to the crowd as kind of a public square in a sense.

We made a logo that shows a Hippocratic Oath being torn in half, surrounded by the phrase, crimes against humanity, because that's what the hospital protocol was. We posed the question, COVID death? Are you sure? To get people thinking and questioning about what happened. So that's the billboard. Hypocratic oath being torn in half, crimes against humanity, the COVID death. Are you sure it was a COVID death? We already have other state chapters of former feds interested in putting up billboards, and we're planning on having planes with our slogan,

Fly Across the Jersey Shore Beaches This Summer. We have car magnets, bumper stickers, and things are really starting to move. She said, we're not stopping, and we never will until we get justice. She said, one of my favorite quotes is, Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are affected. Well, we're going to take a quick break. When we come back, we're going to take a look at a postmortem on the 4th of July.

The left weighed in on their ideas about what it was all about. We'll be right back. Thank you. All right, let's talk about the 4th of July. As a matter of fact, Babylon Bee had a funny little headline here. Spooked by fireworks, Biden pees on the carpet and disappears in the woods behind the White House. I've been to a couple of different parties where that happened to dogs. 4th of July and New Year's. The president is missing. A source confirmed late Tuesday night that Biden, apparently spooked by Independence Day fireworks,

piddled on a rug before bolting in terror into the woods behind the White House. The anonymous source said that Joe forgot to lock Joe in his crate before the fireworks started, causing him to startle at the loud noise. He started running in circles. Of course, he walks that way as well. That's the hardest thing to imagine is Joe Biden running. But anyway, uh, then he peed all over the rug in the bedroom and made a break for it through an

open kitchen door. Unfortunately, the president's son left the back gate open. Perhaps it was, uh, as I point out, meeting with a pharmaceutical representative, not one of the big pharmaceutical representatives, but perhaps somebody who is an independent agent and the alley alley out back, the president bolted off into the woods and hasn't been seen since. Authorities say the missing president has a fondness for sniffing hair and is particularly friendly with children. However, he's very old and fragile and should not be approached. If you see him, please don't chase him, said press secretary.

Remember, he's approximately 560 in dog years in addition to putting out traps baited with ice cream secret service agents spent the night combing the woods for any sign of the president at publishing time the only thing they found was lala harris in the woods with a large stockpile of spent fireworks which um brings me to this i saw this this this morning on Twitter. Angry Tiger yesterday showing his stash of fire. Was it Angry Tiger who scared Joe Biden out of the White House? I don't know, but he put up a video of him shooting off fireworks last night. A year ago, we were here, but none of us really remembered anything at all about 4th of July. We were so busy with working and moving that we didn't really see anything.

But there were some really nice fireworks like these that Angry Tiger put out all around the neighborhood here. And we're up at a high elevation. It was very humid yesterday. And in the evening, there was a low cloud cover all over the valley and it was really cool never seen that before people uh shooting fireworks off and and when they had the lower stuff like roman candles or something like that you would just see the clouds glowing in these red and blue colors and things like that and then across all the horizon you would see all of these fireworks going off some of them very big far away in the distance uh and um

we saw that once when we were in indianapolis uh for fourth of july we're there for a convention and um there was uh fireworks we're in a hotel room, maybe about 10 floors up and looking out the window, Indianapolis was very flat. You could see everything everywhere. And it was, it was pretty interesting, but this is also interesting, especially with the fog last night. It was really cool. Some of them, again, when they don't have big fireworks, like I just showed you anger

tigers, uh, it would, uh, you know, come up through the clouds and then burst. It was really, was really very amazing. But, of course, there's a different kind of fireworks that a lot of people are talking about. And that is perhaps a false flag in the Zaparos nuclear power plant. This is the largest nuclear power plant in Europe. It was built by Russia in Ukraine. And we've got a lot of people weighing in on this. U.S. Marine, this is what he put out on 4chan. And some people put this out on social media.

But the U.S. Marine and RT are saying that today or tonight, Ukraine is planning on doing a false flag attack. Now, maybe they could head that off. I hope they did. But then Zelensky came out and said, no, it's Russia that's going to do it and claimed that we did it. So it's a very concerning thing because, you know, there was this back and forth finger pointing about the dam.

Regardless of who did it, it was devastating. And if there is a false flag attack to explode a nuclear power plant and turn it into a gigantic dirty bomb, that's very concerning as well, what this Marine said, I'm a lurker, but I'll get straight to the point. This is not a happening, uh, thread. This is 100% real. On July 4th or 5th, the United States will bomb the Zaporizhzhia power plant

located in southern Ukraine. I don't care anymore, and I'll be 100% honest with you guys. I'm a Marine Corps infantry veteran who's now working for the U.S. government in electronic espionage and have been for the last five years. The Ukrainian government and the U.S. government are working together in order to bomb the

Zaporozhye plant and to blame the nuclear meltdown on Russia, thus giving us immediate authority to use tactical nuclear weapons on Moscow. This will trigger, and several other cities that he mentions, this will trigger the Russians to throw everything that they have back at the U.S. Thunderstorms are likely in the area, in Ukraine, on the 4th. That's the only reason that it may be pushed to the 5th. You have 72 hours maximum to prepare for nuclear war. Hopefully 96 if the Russians are slow to respond. You have 72 hours maximum to prepare for nuclear war.

Hopefully 96 if the Russians are slow to respond. And we've been told to stay home and prepare. We've been given $15,000 bonuses each to buy survival supplies if necessary. And our offices in Yorkville, Virginia, have been closed down permanently. So this is definite, not a conspiracy theory. Please prepare. Well, that's interesting, isn't it? So I'm passing that on. I hope that is not the case.

We used to have mutually assured destruction, right? Now we just have a mad policy. Now we just have madmen running our government. Is there any question in your mind that these people would not deliberately start a nuclear war? I mean, I was just talking about the massive murder campaign, corrupting the hospitals, turning the hospitals into weapons to kill people. And then we see the vaccine campaigns being run by all these different governments.

On Rockfin, Psalm 144. Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Hey, David, huge fan, longest time listener. Enjoyed the show yesterday. I set up the Wolfpack and wanted to do more to support. Subscribe, star the best way. I love you and thanks for doing your best.

Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Our fees are the lowest right now on Zelle. There is no fee for that. And, of course, there's no fee for any checks or anything like that if you want to send that. But Subscribestar is good because it gives us a bonus even though they charge a fee.

And I don't begrudge them that. I mean, you know, they have to. I don't know how long Zelle is going to run without fees. I think it's just kind of trying to get people, you know, preparing them for FedNow or something. I haven't figured out why they don't charge any fees it's so unlike the big banks to not charge fees isn't it i mean they charge ridiculous fees for everything so i don't understand why that is but it's just you think

of it as just a temporary thing also on rockfin um there is no fee through the end of this year uh so and you can subscribe on Rockfin if you wish. But yeah, that helps us. I thought it was Rumble that was doing news. I'm sorry. Yeah, not Rumble. Thank you. The other one that starts with an R.

Had a Biden moment there. Yeah, it is Rumble that is doing that for the end of the year. So I appreciate that. And it also helps, even if you don't send money, to click like wherever you're watching it, whether you're watching it on one of the video platforms or you're watching it as a podcast. If you like the podcast, if you make positive comments,

that's even better. It doesn't have to be anything long. You know, just say, oh, I really love this or whatever. All that stuff helps us in terms of visibility. And of course, the biggest thing you can do to help us, and I say this because you identify yourself as Psalm 144, biggest thing you can do is to pray for us, really do appreciate that. And we believe that that is very effective.

But this is very disturbing news, frankly. I don't know if this is going to be the case. But again, they're saying that this is imminent, about to happen. And we have seen for the longest time this seems to be their long-term plan. Joel Skousen has been saying this for years. And, of course, it has been decades in the making, going back to the 90s, when you look at the, you know, first there was a collapse of soviet union and they didn't wait too long until nato started consolidating and moving toward the soviet union then making it very clear that putin was the greatest criminal in the world as they

tried to connect him falsely with trump and on and on and then making it clear that they're coming after Putin to kill him. And so this is an existential threat, if not for Russia completely, for Putin at the very least, the leader of the country. They're trying to push us into nuclear war. And as I said before, this is the largest nuclear plant in Europe. It's the ninth largest in the world. And when I looked at that list, I thought, that's kind of interesting. Japan has the largest nuclear power plant.

Oh, by the way, Fukushima is not it. And they just approved a plan to release the radioactive water of the Fukushima plant. And there was no compromise of the plant itself with the earthquake. What happened was the flooding from the tsunami from the earthquake, all the nuclear waste is stored on site. That's the problem with nuclear power is the waste. They've kicked this radioactive can down the road without really having a plan to do anything about it,

and that's the big problem with it. And so they had these storage pools. Storage pools, you know, you use, you get the nuclear power and now you've got this waste product. Well, what do you do with it? Well, we got to put it in pools and we got to keep it cooled. And that means that we got to have constant power for this. And that was another big part of the problem.

But, um, the tsunami flooded that and they had tons of, know tons i don't know what they yeah had lots of radioactive water um but of course uh that's not a direct threat to us i remember when alex when alex sent uh reporters to the west coast with Geiger counters to measure. I mean, what do you think that what are the parts per million, even if it was highly radioactive and they dumped it in the water, that'd be an issue for the people in and around Japan and around Fukushima, but even rain and, you know,

other parts of Japan, it would be so diluted by the time it got to them. It'd be ridiculous, but you wanted them to try to look for radioactive uh waste on the coast and when they when they didn't find it he doesn't understand the uh the whole thing about parts for a million the get this diluted throughout the entire pacific ocean you know between uh between you know you have a uh, between, you know, you have a big distance between Japan and Hawaii, and then a huge distance

between Hawaii and California. He's been to Hawaii. You ought to know that I haven't been to Hawaii, uh, but he's been there several times and then he got so angry, angry at the people when they couldn't find it and he told them, make it up, come up with something. You got to show them, you get something radioactive and show it out there. I mean, it was ridiculous. Uh, anyway, um, and then it got criminal, you know, what he was doing with, uh, in 2020,

in my opinion, uh, with, uh, supporting Trump through this lockdown of vaccines, supporting him through January the 6th. Anyway, uh, getting back to the nuclear power plants, Japan has the largest. It's not Fukushima. Canada is number three. China has four out of the top nine. And there's not a single one from the U.S. that is in there, which I thought was kind of interesting.

Bidenomics means the most expensive Independence Day cookout ever. According to Martin Armstrong on Statista, I guess is how you pronounce it. Fourth of July spending on food is expected to have risen to a record $9.5 billion this year. Now, this is different from going out and getting a basket of items you know and saying well this is what you know we're going to get hamburgers and ketchup and mustard and hot dogs and all this rest of stuff and and then comparing it to that same basket of individual goods in a previous year this is coming from the national retail federation and they're talking about spending excuse me on food uh and it has jumped and again this is a good measure though of how expensive things have become and it is amazing how much it has gone up

uh and it's not just that americans are eating more i know yes we're all gaining weight. It's become something of a worldwide joke. But in 2014, $6.3 billion. In 2023, $9.5 billion. You got about a 50% increase. And the National Retail Federation says that it has been a year-over-year increase of 23%. So there you go. That's Bidenomics for you. Synonymous with out-of-control inflation. Kind of like Jimmy Carter.

Probably go down like another Jimmy Carter, except Jimmy Carter wasn't as corrupt as this guy. Nobody is. Anyway, Sheetz. You know this if you live in the East Coast. It's a gas station store. Drop the prices of all grades of gas, except for diesel, to $1.77.6. So it says on the pump, $17.76. Until their supplies ran out, their promotional supplies ran out.

But it's interesting that it applied, I mean, even to premium. The flex fuel. So flex fuel, unleaded, mid-grade, premium, all that, but not diesel. You know, I had a couple of diesel cars, and we got them because at the time, it was the cheapest grade of gas. They do the least amount of processing to it, but it was the federal government that artificially increased the price of diesel. So now it is the most expensive of all the fuels.

And that in and of itself is very inflationary because the semi-trucks that deliver everything run on diesel. But of course, you don't see that, do you? It is embedded into the price like a value-added tax because they've got to recover this or they go out of business. And so they pass that cost along to you. But yeah, it is absolutely amazing. So they have 675 stores, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. And it's family-owned, operated company. And the CEO and president of Sheetz, Travis Sheetz, said we're always looking for ways to assist the communities

and the customers that we serve. Well, that's nice that they had that. As a matter of fact, my Travis was in Williamsburg yesterday for the 4th of July. And he was telling me about that before I saw it on the news, but it actually made national news. I thought it was kind of interesting. What they don't tell you, or they don't dare tell you the truth

about the 4th of July. This is Tom Woods. And he says, in school we were told no taxation without representation. And that reminds me, you you know we used to always go to uh colonial williamsburg we lived in north carolina we love to go there there and here in the mountains and um we would go up there it was fascinating to watch it and they had people who were doing trades you know building trades making their own bricks, cutting their own raw lumber from trees that they've done, and then building period piece buildings.

And you could go around and you could just talk to them and they would talk to you normally. They had other people who were reenactors who would talk to you as if they were the character or if they were somebody who was living there at the time. But most of the people who were involved in trades would just straight out talk to you. And so we'd walk around, we'd look at that, and we'd even do some of the other stuff. But it just was so woke. It's run by the Rockefeller Foundation. And even 20, 25 years ago, they were just already horrible.

So for the most part, I'd take the up and, um, I would give them the history lesson while we looked at the physical stuff. And I remember they would have, um, at the courthouse, they had a group out there and said, so what was the revolutionary? What was the revolution about? I knew they wanted to hear somebody say no taxation without representation. You know, what was their issue with taxes? And so I shouted out, I knew they weren't going to like this.

I shout out, taxation is theft. And the person was like, what? Kind of like when I shouted out about Silverstein and Building 7 to a tour group in New York. But it was like, well, no, no, that's not it. I said, but it is theft. But anyway, no, but it's gone beyond taxation without representation. As I've said many times, it's now regulation without representation as well. And that's all due to our bureaucratic government.

You want to talk about swarms of officers who harass our people and eat out their substance? That is the bureaucratic state. Unelected, unaccountable. And it's worse and far more pervasive than anything that the British ever did. It is everywhere. And so he said, yeah, no taxation without representation. But he said the real principles were more like the following, no legislation without representation.

And it's not legislation. It's regulation because it's coming from the regulatory agencies. It's not law. We've got to understand, and we need to make this distinction, that stuff that is put out there by the regulatory agencies is not law because they make that distinction and they use it to deny us our due process. They say, well, we would have to have, you would have to be presumed innocent and you'd have to have due process and all the rest of the stuff if it were a law.

But it's not a law. It's a regulation. So we don't have to do any of that stuff. We find you guilty and we fine you. And in order to stop that, you have to prove your innocence. And there is no protection against excessive fines as well. I've talked about this many times. I won't go any further into it.

But he went on to say, he said, contrary to a modern Western view of the state, that it must be considered one and indivisible, the colonists believe that a smaller unit may withdraw from a larger one. Today, we're supposed to consider this to be unthinkable. Well, why would they think that? Well, because that's exactly what they had done. The Declaration of Independence is a declaration of secession. It is a declaration of self-government.

It's also about their rights to govern themselves. It's one of the reasons why I always opposed Ukraine. I believed that Ukraine had the population and had ties to Russia culturally, linguistically, and other things, religiously, of course. They wanted to leave Ukraine, and then Ukraine started shelling the civilian areas and did it for eight years until this invasion. No, they had a right to secede. They had a right to self-government.

And that's what 1776 is ultimately about. That whole idea that's embedded into the Pledge of Allegiance, one and indivisible, that came from the Grand Army of the Republic. It was an organization of Union soldiers who had fought in the Civil War. And so one nation, indivisible. And they didn't put the under God in there until the 1950s. It really reads harsh.

And if you go back and look at the way the pledge was to be made by the Grand Army of the Republic, it was with the right arm extended out rigidly with a palm down. They changed it after the Nazis started doing that. But it was very authoritarian, fascist, if you will. So this is a country that was founded on secession, on independence, on self-governance, on decentralization. And Lincoln killed about 10% of the population in the South,

actually about 20% if the population in the South, actually about 20% if you look at it by the number of men that were there. And that's one thing that we need to remember as well. How do we go from a nation that was a lot of, and again, if you want to think about America pre-Civil War, as many people said prior to the Civil War, people would say the United States are, after the United States is. They got their consolidation, but that was never the intended purpose. If you look at the Civil War as it was fought, you had armies from different states.

You know, you had the Army of Virginia. You had the Army of Pennsylvania. They were under a unified command. They viewed the federal government in the same way today that we view the United Nations, and that should be a concern for us today. The fact that the United Nations has been created by sovereign states. The federal government was created by sovereign states. When we think of the United Nations, we think of the states as being superior in sovereignty

to the United Nations. The United Nations does not want it to remain that way in the same way The United Nations does not want it to remain that way in the same way the federal government did not want it to remain that way. That's what they're seeking. Then there was this piece from Esquire, Charles Pierce. This year, he says, I'm just not in the mood for life, liberty, and all that. All that. You know the thing, as Joe Biden said.

So he said in his article, he begins by saying, on July 4th, 1821, then Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, the son of John Adams, was asked to deliver a speech to the House of Representatives to celebrate the day. That was a speech in which he said, America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. I thought, okay, well, that's something here. You know, at least this guy from Esquire understands that because we've lost that, right? Now, that's all we do.

That is the raison d'etre for our so-called Defense Department. Let's go everywhere searching for monsters we can destroy. But no, he doesn't talk about that. This guy's a hardcore leftist. He doesn't care about peace. He doesn't care about military adventurism and endless war. But he says, he quotes from the speech where John Quincy Adams says, since her admission among them, has invariably, though often fruitlessly, held forth to them the hand of honest friendship, of equal freedom, of generous reciprocity.

But that's not the way we are today. Now, we are an American empire which seeks to bully people into submission and seeks to establish wars everywhere for profit because it is such a profitable enterprise. And so then he talks about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and he takes this approach, this liberal from Esquire. He says, life, life?

He's not talking about abortion. He talks about gun control. We can't do anything about the carnage ensuing from the country's insane affection for firearms? No, he doesn't care about abortion, does he? Well, you know, maybe instead of, maybe the pro-life people ought to start a movement to ban forceps, you think? Maybe we should ban forceps, a tool of abortion. You know, guns are just a tool. And like forceps, guns can be used to save life

or they can be used to rip people apart. But that doesn't seem to get through to a liberal who doesn't think when people say the right to life, abortion doesn't even connect to him. Then he talks about liberty. And you would think, well, he's a writer. Is he going to talk about censorship and free speech and things like that? No, no, he's not going to talk about that. He said, this is a word that's been twisted beyond all reckoning. Moms for Liberty quotes Hitler. Well, what they did was they put a quote there, and Hitler

has said it. Every authoritarian government has said it. Plato said it. That if you get a child at an early age, you can mold them for the rest of life. But you can look at that as positive or negative. And just because they unfortunately chose the rest of life. But you can look at that as positive or negative. And just because they unfortunately chose the wording of Hitler doesn't mean that they're Hitler supporters. It means that they understand that, and it would have been better for them, Moms for Liberty, they should have gone with the age old quote, the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. That's what Moms for Liberty should have gone to. But old quote the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world that's what moms for liberty should have gone to but i guess maybe they're too feminist to do i want to talk about

that oh we don't want to really be mothers in the sense right uh but um but he took that out of context and it's become a liberal trope to take that out of context for moms for a Liberty. Look, going back to King Solomon and Proverbs train up a child in the way they should go when they're old, they will not depart from it. People have always understood how important it is early education in terms of developing character or in terms of making somebody a monster. And then he goes on to the pursuit of happiness. Now what does he focus on with that well he focuses

on the fact that our gay and trans fellow citizens are under attack i'm like oh oh we got to do nothing got a new definition for pursuit of happiness you, gay always meant happy. And so I guess this is now about the pursuit of gayness or the pursuit of LGBT agenda. I guess that's now our new definition for the pursuit of happiness, the pursuit of LGBT depravity and the gay lifestyle. Yeah, that's, that's gotta be it. Uh, just wait. Um, I'm going to take credit for this.

If they start saying that next year, the pursuit of gayness, instead of the pursuit of happiness, because it has become our new flag. And, uh, it is our new religion, our state religion. In a polarized U.S., how do we define patriot? Asked the Associated Press. And, of course, Associated Press is always redefining words. They have a script. They have essentially a dictionary or whatever of speech rules that they have for journalists. If you want the Associated Press to pass along your story,

and that's very important for journalists, you've got to use their approved terms. You will not say things like anchor baby. You'll not say things like illegal alien or any of that other stuff. You'll not say pro-life. You will say anti-abortion rights, according to the Associated Press. So now the Associated Press gets onto the term patriot. And they can't seem to define the term. They skate around it and they try to come up with some subjective term

for patriot. And then of course they want to make it into a dangerous evil thing. That's the Associated Press. So first they pretend they don't know where it came from. Then they push it into being evil. So they say, yeah, we've got different versions of patriot. Here we are because we just redefined the words and nothing actually ever means anything and there is no truth and we don't know where this word came from,

although they do point out that, well, it comes from a greek word but let's not talk about that now this is post-modernism or as i said yesterday uh it is post-objectivity post-history post all the rest of stuff we can't look at how things came to be why they are there uh we don't there isn't any truth so so why even bother? We're just going to tell you what to think. Today, they said the word and its variants, patriot, have morphed beyond the original meaning. It's become infused with political rhetoric and school curriculums and varying definitions while being appropriated by white nationalist groups.

Trying to define what a patriot is depends on who is being asked. Again, you know, there is no truth to anything. It's all relative and it's what you think. While the word's origins come from ancient Greece, it is somebody who loves his or her country, they said. Well, where does it come from in ancient Greece? What was that word? It was patriots, P-A-T-R-I-T-S. I don't know if I'm pronouncing it the way they would say it, but it sounds essentially the same. What did that mean? Patris, patrits or something. It meant fatherland. That's why we talk about the founding fathers. It's one of the reasons why they won't talk about that, because it is patriot is the same as patriarchy.

They hate patriarchy. They hate rule by fathers. They want matriarchy, rule by mothers, which is, of course, superior. They hate anything that is reeks of maleness. But that was the reality. The fatherland. Patriots, your country. um so they said you know these people who took part in the american revolution they were working people who were advocating

for their voices to be heard in the political process is that what these guys is that what jefferson and adams and franklin and these guys sound like to you? They were advocating for their voices to be heard in a political process? No. No, they were acting like men. They were acting like providers and protectors. They were acting like founding fathers. The role of a man is protector, provider, patriarch. And they took that upon themselves.

They took action to provide for their posterity. The hearts of the fathers returned toward their children and their grandchildren and on beyond that. And that is the hallmark of a thriving society that has the will to survive, and you won't see any trace of that in modern America, none whatsoever. So they go on and say, patriotism really depends on which American is describing himself as

patriotic and which version or vision of the country they hold dear. Said a historian at Dartmouth, which is another reason you don't want to go to college, especially the Ivy League colleges. By the 1990s, so many anti-government and militia groups are using the term to describe themselves, the watchdog groups refer to it as the Patriot Movement. So then they bring in Timothy McVeigh and all the rest of this. This is all just a smear of the rest of this article, but I thought it was interesting how they tried to skirt around this.

And of course, the Associated Press is always about creating terms and defining these terms to serve their agenda. That's the thing that they do all the time. Speaking of that, though, you had one poll said, a one poll survey, that's the name of it, one poll. Question 1,000 U.S. respondents, 99% of them identified as either born or naturalized U.S. citizens, but they had no idea what Independence Day was. 59% gave the correct answer. It was the day that Fourth of July is about the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

Another 22, however, said it was the establishment of the United States as an independent nation. That's not really wrong. You know, the way they put that poll out there in a sense. That was the seminal moment, the way you defined it. And that's one of the reasons why the Declaration of Independence is so important to us because it defined what America is about. And I put it there equal or greater to the Constitution. The Constitution is an attempt to put that into law,

and the Bill of Rights is good as far as it goes, and it does go pretty far because you've got the Tenth Amendment, but I think the real founding principles of America will be found in the Declaration of Independence. But when you put those two together, that's 81% of the people. That means that about 20% of the people are clueless about what it was about. They don't know it was about the signing. They don't think it was about the establishment of the U.S. government.

Only 45% correctly answered the year the very first organized celebration of independence took place. That was the next year, 1777. That's not unusual. I had a 1776 cap. I remember going into a convenience store one day and the guy behind the counter saw my 1776 cap and he goes, Oh, uh, you follow Philadelphia. And it's like, what? And after a confused back and forth, I eventually determined that he thought that I was a follower of a Philadelphia basketball team that has adopted the 1776 name, the 76ers, because Philadelphia, as I pointed out

yesterday, was the first capital. It was at the time the largest city in the United States. But 82%, only 82% knew that the commander-in-chief of the military is the president. And only 82% knew that the commander-in-chief of the military is the president. And only 82% identified the Star-Spangled Banner as the national anthem. I mean, 20% of the people in this country don't know anything. Anything.

They just don't even know what gender they are or what a gender is. So as we look at this out of the UK, it's really no better. This is one person writing on Daily Skeptic who's still in school, talking about relentless indoctrination

about issues such as climate change, why people have far right extreme views. It's never far left, he says. And then extremism and terrorism. Again, there are no extremists or terrorists on the left, always on the right. These are the aspects of the curriculum that are being pushed by the government in the UK.

Each Friday, he says, at school we participate in Votes for Schools, where the government gives us a question to discuss. Recently, the question was, quote, are far-right views persuasive to young people? These far-right views are not defined, but presumably include questioning gender ideology, climate change, or the COVID narrative. You see?

It's the big three everywhere. The three MacGuffins. Right? We've got to have a gender ideology. We've got to have climate change. Don't question our COVID lockdowns or vaccines. There has not been a follow-up question about far-left views despite their influence lately. He says extremism conspiracy views seem to be exclusively held by the far-right,

according to our schools. None of them are far-left. Looking at conspiracies such as 9-11 was faked and an inside job or secret societies control the world is what they are lecturing these kids on in school. Now, that would be a real education. If you understand that 9-11 was not faked, it was real. People died as they do in all these things. But it was a false flag and it was an inside job. If you understand that, if you understand that secret societies, like Bilderberg, and I would even include the World Economic Forum and other ones like that Club of Rome, there's a whole bunch of them. Yeah, they do run the world.

They've got an agenda, and we're marching in lockstep on that agenda. That'd be a real education. If you homeschool your kids, make sure you tell them about that. That's the real education they need to understand in terms of politics and history. According to my school, they're teaching this to make us aware of all the forms of terrorism. Far right or Islamic extremism, they said. Yeah, they don't have any conspiracy theories, right? I mean, Russiagate, that wasn't a far left conspiracy theory, was it?

By the way, we look at the National Archives, people that are at war with Trump over his boxes of classified documents. It was back in just two years ago. In 2021, the National Archives labeled the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence as documents that had harmful language in it, a trigger warning. And it used politically incorrect language. Yeah, you know what's really politically incorrect is to say that when governments become destructive of our God-given rights and liberties, it is our duty and our right and our duty to alter or to abolish that government.

That's really politically incorrect. Absolutely. Who is that warning for? George Soros? Careful, George. I don't know. You won't like this. I don't know, but they put that on there.

They said, and this is what they said. These documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, reflect racist, sexist. There you go misogynistic, and xenophobic opinions and attitudes. And it is discriminatory towards diverse views on sexuality, gender, religion, and more. You better believe it is. We will be right back. Stay with us. ¶¶ © BF-WATCH TV 2021 liberty it's your move it's the david knight show All right, yeah, you know, as I look at that, it was Jefferson who set the standards for liberty,

and it was Washington who set the standards for integrity and honesty. And I know there's a lot of mythology about it, a lot of hagiographies written about George Washington, but it was necessary for Americans to at least believe, whether it was true or not, that the man could not tell a lie. We wanted that. That was our value. And today we have turned that on its head.

We desire leaders who tell a lie. It's okay. It's 4-D chess, we've been told. It's good to lie to get your way. It's good to lie if it means that you can win. We don't want people of integrity. We despise people of integrity. We drive them out of the public square.

Just take a look at this. George Santos hit with 80,000 pages of discovery documents. They're going to come after him big time. But look, folks, why are we supporting him? Because he's GOP. Founders of this country despised partisan politics. And this is why. Because people would line up behind a guy who has never told the truth about anything. George Washington can tell a lie. George Santos can't tell the truth about anything, anything in his life.

Everything in his life is a lie. He faces a 13 count federal indictment with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives. But he's GOP. Give him a pass. Come on. He's our guy.

He's our party. I hope they throw him in jail and throw away the key. So we have prosecutors are now preparing to hit Trump and his allies with new charges. It's called a superseding indictment saying, well, we've already indicted him on these boxes issues as papers is, um, you know, that he refused to give back that he admits, uh, we're not declassified. Even Alan Dershowitz, who is Saul Goodman to Trump. He's Trump's Saul Goodman. Let's think of a way that we can explain this away. You got a tiger that you're being charged with having a tiger trap?

Let's think about what we could do with that. Even Alan Dershowitz can't come up with an excuse. The best he can do after looking at this stuff and hearing the tape, well, maybe those things were actually declassified and Trump didn't know that somebody had declassified them. That's the best that you can do. Dershowitz or Saul Goodman.

That ain't going to be good enough. That's a, you know, he violated the law. He knowingly violated the law. But that's seen as a badge of honor to his followers. A superseding indictment, a second set of charges against an already indicted defendant. And these might be brought in the Southern District of Florida. But, of course, as many people have been saying from the very beginning,

since it's really incriminating recording was not part of those charging indictments, and since that happened in New Jersey, they may be filing that in New Jersey because the judge in Florida was appointed by Trump and she's been friendly to him. And if they feel like they're not getting their way, they will put it in new jersey look i understand that as i've said uh we have a national security state that

has made everything a secret and as i read to you a quote from a person who said that this is like a poison running through our society, this secrecy. We need to have more transparency and things like that. But these people take this very seriously. Trump signed on to this. He signed on to the rules. He took an oath to the Constitution. He swore to uphold these laws and so forth, and he openly flaunts them. Do we really want to have a society where we give passes to presidents to violate any and every law that is out there? Well, yeah, unfortunately, a lot of people want to do that. But things are starting to heat up for Trump.

You have Giuliani over the weekend. The news was out that he had done a proffer agreement queen for a day, they said. I thought that was funny because I'd already seen Giuliani be queen for a day with Trump back when. Remember when he cross-dressed and he and Trump did that video? Well, Rudy was a queen for a day there. Now he's a queen for a day in the sense that with the proffer agreement when he is going to be indicted for crimes himself and he's already been suspended in new york and washington as a result of his licenses law license has been suspended because of false statements that he made

but um it looks like they're going to charge him for January the 6th or something associated to that. They brought him in for statements and his queen for a day. He doesn't just get to wear a dress and a crown. He also gets to say anything that he wants and not have that held against him in a sense. And so, you know, it's like trying to negotiate some kind of a plea bargaining statement with him. with them, um, Mark Meadows, who was the, um, congressman head of the house freedom Congress, uh, um, uh, and, and, uh, house freedom caucus in Congress. And then became chief of staff for Trump. Uh, he has already testified for Georgia grand jury.

It looks like he is also going to be a part of this special prosecutor investigation into Trump. And that's what people understand. They understand this is a political persecution. But as I said before, do you really want to have the, you know, the answer to this is not to say let Trump go. The answer to this is to say prosecute Biden as well. And that ball is in the Republican court

because you don't prosecute a sitting president. You have to impeach them first, remove them from office. Then you can come after them for crimes. because you don't prosecute a sitting president. You have to impeach them first, remove them from office. Then you can come after them for crimes. So right now, this is in the, will the Republicans in the House do anything about that? So one right-wing journalist has very interesting reasons for supporting Trump over DeSantis.

And, um, this is, um, a conservative journalist. This is from, by the way, revolver,

Darren Beatty's thing. And, um, this is a conservative journalist, Rogan O'Hanley, who I've never heard of before. And, um,

he is debating Trump or DeSantis. He says, I'm a big fan of DeSantis, but I want the guy who's got the most impeachments, indictments, and investigations under his belt. Really? Wow. I want the guy with the most impeachments, indictments, and other investigations because that makes him good.

Let me tell you something. This is not, we look at what's going on with Biden and how he's getting a pass. And how they are holding Trump to the ultimate letter of the law in all of these things. Trump is guilty. He should not be given a pass. The outrage of all this is that biden is being given a pass and yet you got these people holding this forth as some kind of a badge of honor trump is the antithesis and antithesis of antithesis sorry of george washington

we used to want character we used to want truth now we want somebody who is a character and then you have um uh darren beattie weighing in on this he says let's put it this way trump earned his indictments i don't think desantis will get indicted this should be this should be a question to all of these candidates well you know darren beattie was out there talking about Stuart Rhodes, saying that he was an agent provocateur, and he kept that up. You know, he was an inside job, and he was pulling all this stuff off. And then even when Stuart Rhodes, they brought the ridiculous charges against him of seditious conspiracy, he said, this is impossible. You had Darren Beatty say, this is impossible.

It just proved my point that he's an agent provocateur, that he's a fed. Because this is such over-the-top charging, he's going to get off on this. Well, he didn't. And now they've thrown the book at him, decades in jail. We'll have to see what happens on appeal. Stuart Rhodes said, you know, they were just paving the way to come after Trump on this. These conservatives

who are out there attaching themselves to Trump and to his crimes are not doing us any services. They are pushing us toward a civil war. And let me give you an example of this. This is an interview with a guy who was at

the trump uh fourth of july weekend rally in south carolina that drew about 50 000 people listen to what this always trumper has to say there are indictments there are there's audio tape of him with uh classified documents sharing them with people who weren't, didn't have that security clearance. Does any of that bother you? No, I think they've been after him so long that all of this is just a witch hunt, like he described it. I don't think there's anything Trump's done wrong. I think that the desperate opposition is just after him. I mean, they started out, you know, and they've been after him eight different ways, and they're going to keep after him until they can get him in jail,

I think. They went after Richard Nixon, they went after Bill Clinton, and now the courts in several different states are finding different things about Trump. Is there anything that could happen with him indictment-wise that would say, all right, maybe this disqualifies him for president? Not for me. I'm with him to the finish. All right. Thank you so much. He could stand on the front steps of the White House and commit murder, and I'm with him.

Explain that to me. That's amazing. Look, he's the only man we've ever had in my lifetime that stood for America as president. Now, I was a George Herbert Walker Bush man and all that, but they don't anybody compared to Donald Trump. He loves this country, and that's why I love him. The people, my people are so smart. And you know what else they say about my people? The polls.

They say I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters. OK, it's like incredible. Isn't that amazing? I don't care what he does. He can shoot people in the head, kill them. He can shoot people with vaccines.

I'll still vote for him. He can kill tens of millions of people. He can sterilize people. He can slow kill them with poison. I'll still vote for him. I love that guy. I want to throw up when I see men like that. And, of course, you listen to his standard.

He was for Bush number one, the CIA agent who lied us into wars and all the rest of this stuff. The guy who pushed NAFTA and so many other issues. This man has absolutely no discernment and he will follow Bush or Trump into the gates of hell. It's just amazing to me to see this stuff happening out there. We'll be right back. Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is, however, not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly.

Today the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country. Tomorrow, it will be something else. ¶¶ liberty it's your move you're listening to the david knight show well we go from the boston tea party to hunter biden's coke parties in the white house or whoever it was that did there perhaps it was uh some of biden's staff who did it perhaps it was joe i don't know secret service investigating how cocaine got in the White House. I can't imagine. Can you? I can't imagine how it could be in that White House. Secret Service Uniform Division investigated an unknown item found inside a work area.

The reason that this came out, they didn't put out some kind of a press release in the White House. Oh, we found some cocaine in here. Anybody want to claim it? Oh, it's mine. No, it's mine. They would all be lining up. They probably all would be right as well.

They probably all were doing cocaine in the White House. In a dispatch about 8.49 p.m., a firefighter with the D.C. Department's Hazardous Materials Team radioed the results of a test. We have a yellow bar saying cocaine hydrochloride. And so this was something that people who monitor the radio communications, citizens, I mean, we're not even talking about Russia. Can you imagine what Russia and China know about the Bidens? Well, of course they know because they've been paying them money. But beyond that, beyond the bribery from China and all these others,

the brief broadcast was logged on a website called OpenMHZ.com, like megahertz, which allows people to listen to live and archived radio transmission from police and fire departments. And so this happened on Sunday night. So Secret Service finds a white powder. And they call the hazmat group in. And they say, oh, it's Coke. Things go better with Coke in the Biden White House. So the discovery came two days after recovering crack cocaine addict Hunter Biden

was last seen in the White House. Yet there appears to be some mystery as to how it got there. You know, I always thought Democrats preferred Pepsi. That's right. Yeah, I was told that by my friend who was in the military. He said, at least this was true back in the 80s and 90s, he said, whenever you would have a change of administration, if the Republicans came in, they'd take out all the Pepsi machines and put in Coke and vice versa.

I don't know if that's true, still true or not. Yeah. But the Democrats have put the Pepsi machines in and the Republicans put in Coke, but now the man, now maybe they're doing Pepsi and Coke in the Biden white house. I don't know.

Secret service spokesperson said the Biden was not in the executive mansion when the substance was discovered. Investigation of the cause and manner of how it entered the White House is pending, he said. Laughingly hinting, this is Zero Hedge, laughingly hinting that there was some confusion as to how crack got inside the bloated, I mean, Biden family's D.C. estate. As they say on Zero Edge. The item was sent to Secret Service Lab for further testing, said the sources. Just take it to Hunter. He's the expert.

And besides, it's probably his anyway. His or Joe's or maybe some other member of this crime family. Gavin Newsom is now campaigning heavily in Idaho, which Biden is not doing. Lala Harris is not doing. I've said from the very beginning, when you look at the calls that he was, you know, he's training his fire on DeSantis. Gavin Newsom is very calculating and he understands how this game is working and he knows the inside story.

And I think it's his estimation that Biden isn't going to make it. And, uh, he's going to be in such a sad state physically and mentally that he's not going to be running again, that Lala Harris is no competition for him. And so he has trained his fire on DeSantis because I believe that he thinks that as people, uh, start to come to their senses about Trump and let's hope that they do eventually, I still can't believe that three years after the warp speed thing, we still got people who are following him. And again, as I say, they don't care if he kills people.

So evidently that's it. I guess they don't care, but the LA times was reported that Gavin Newsom headline and event for Idaho Democrats. And he says, I'm really proud of this president. And I hope you are as well. Yeah. He took this to a place where they were having a meeting over banned books. And you know what they mean by banned books.

They mean kid porn and porn directed at kids and grooming of kids. That's what they're banning. He visited a bookstore in Idaho that was selling banned books, posted a video of it on social media. He's putting in time and effort that nobody outside the White House appears to be, nobody else in the White House appears to be, nobody else in the White House appears to be doing. California Republican Party chairwoman said that Newsom should not be exporting his failures

to additional states while Newsom is running a shadow presidential campaign. And again, I think he believes that it's going to be him and DeSantis. That would be an easy choice, wouldn't it? RFK Jr. got some interesting, had some interesting statements in his interview with Reason Magazine. Reason Magazine came across as incredibly unfair, biased, ignorant on so many different issues. And they have been. They've been out of touch on censorship. You know, they were constantly saying,

well, corporations can do whatever they want. And this is the big blind spot for libertarian organizations like Reason Magazine. Corporations can do no wrong. Government can do no right. And the Democrats are exactly the opposite. Corporations can do no wrong. Government can do no right. And the Democrats are exactly the opposite. Corporations can do nothing right, and the government can do nothing wrong. And so they believed, and I've even seen John Stossel do video pieces featured by Reason saying, well, I really hate the fact that they're censoring me,

but hey, that's their right, you know, their corporation. And there were several things that came out of this interview, and I'll be talking about these things over a few days here, but one of them was how they came after him about being a conspiracy theorist. Really, Reason? Are you that clueless? Are you really that clueless? Uh, the vaccines and the rest of the stuff and, and RFK Jr. came back and he's, he's very good at this. And he says, okay, so tell me specifically, uh, what you have an issue with. You just make this blanket charge about me being a conspiracy theorist. Do you want to talk to any specific things? Nick Gillespie, who runs Reason, says one of the critiques of your candidacy or even your public profile is that you traffic routinely in conspiracies and that kind of conspiracist

mindset where almost everything we take for granted is bad. Well, the problem with you, Nick, is that you push out FBI labels. They were meant to silence people in investigations. And they do talk about free speech. But I think in the context of that, the appropriate way would be to, you know, come back against. But again, RFK Jr. knows how he says. So it's, you know, the COVID vaccines not only uh don't work but they're more dangerous than covid itself said gillespie i said that's a that's a conspiracy theory

to say that they don't work but they're dangerous now reason is dangerous this line of statism from this so-called libertarian organization is dangerous. Let me remind you that in Australia, the Liberal Democrats, they have the original meaning of the term liberal. They're supposed to be for liberty. Liberal Democrats in Australia would be called libertarians. And they were in control in New South Wales where Gladys Berejiklian was.

One of the most authoritarian lockdown people. And I can imagine that Nick Gillespie would be right there with her. I can imagine that the reason magazine editor of whatever his official title is, he's head of it. I can imagine that he would be right

there with Gladys Berejiklian locking people down. Just amazing what status they are. So Kennedy replied to Gillespie says, so show me where I got it wrong. I'll go through any of these things that you say. All I do is talk about conspiracy theories. Give me an example. I'll go through it point by point.

And then he said, then Gillespie didn't want to do that. He wanted to do a hit and run smear campaign. He says, well, you did something, RFK Jr. said, you did something that is very unfair. You made a series of characterizations about my beliefs that you read in the newspaper, many of which are wrong, and you don't give me an opportunity to respond to them. You refuse to be specific about that.

And so you had a lot of people replying to that on social media, calling it a horrible interview, calling it dishonest. Um, you cut off his response once he had a chance to defend himself. Great journalism said one person, but I want to play for you because one of the things that was interesting about this was they finally got him. They finally had somebody ask him a question. I'm glad that they did. Finally, somebody asked him a question about why he said he wanted to put the Koch brothers in prison and why he would give the death penalty. He needed to answer that question. Here's the back and forth. Speaking of free speech, in the past, you have called for the jailing of CEOs and climate change skeptics. We've got a clip from 2014 of you.

Let's run that clip. And then could you explain what was your thinking and whether or not it's changed since then? Sure. I think they should be enjoying three hots and a cot at the Hague with all the other war criminals who are there. What about politicians, people who deny who express skepticism? I think they're selling out the public trust. And, you know, I think those guys who are doing the Koch brothers bidding and who are

against all the evidence of the rational mind are saying that global warming doesn't exist there contemptible human beings and that well i wish that there were a lot of you can punish them under i don't think there's a war a lot of you can punish those politicians under but i do i think the co brothers should be prosecuted for reckless endangerment absolutely that's a criminal offense and they ought to be serving time for it. All right. Well, thank you very much. Appreciate it. Okay. Do you still feel that way? Obviously, we're down one Coke brother. Yeah. You have to look at the earlier part of that clip, which you didn't show.

Okay. It shows that I was being asked a question about their criminal conduct. The Koch Energy at that time was, I think it was the third or fourth largest air polluter in the world. It was maintaining pet coke piles in Detroit and Chicago that were poisoning poor neighborhoods. It had been criminally convicted of violating environmental, which means it did it knowingly in order to make money. And what I say earlier on the clip, I say if a black kid steals $10 from a grocery store, he'd go to jail. But why shouldn't the Koch brothers be going to jail if they're stealing hundreds of millions of dollars, which was...

Do you think people who... Let me finish up, because I have said that companies, that certain entities, corporate entities, that habitually violate the law or whose purposes they injure the public wheel, the public interest, those corporations should be subject to the corporate death penalty. And what that means is there's a there's a you know, the corporations are licensed by the states, but most of the states require that the corporation in order to get a charter and operate in the public interest and if it departs from the public interest,

in other words, if it's completely consumed by private interest that is actually damaging the public interest in the states, the Secretary of State and the Attorney General have the capacity in various states to yank that charter in every state. You know, somebody has the ability to yank that charter. For example, in New York State in the 1990s, the Republican attorney general liquidated the Tobacco Institute. The Tobacco Institute was an institute that was created by Philip Morris and the other tobacco companies. Those companies knew for 60 years that their product was killing one out of every four of their customers who used the product as directed, but they were lying to the public about it, and they were creating fake. Let me finish this, because this is important for people to know, because I've been accused of this before.

The Tobacco Institute was created to deceive the public about the dangers of tobacco. And it was given the corporate death penalty in New York, and its assets were then distributed. The Koch brothers at that time were funding a series of think tanks that were designed to hide pollution, to minimize pollution, to do things that were dangerous to the public and that were fraudulent. Do you think that's still the case? The First Amendment does not protect fraudulent speech. If you say something that is fraudulent, you're not protected.

So I do believe. I'm going to cut it there in the interest of time. We're almost finished with that clip that I wanted you to hear. So I'll just summarize what he goes on to say. He says, look, it doesn't protect you against fraudulent speech. And they said, well, then who determines what is true and what is not true? And I think it was, well, you have a court proceedings where you have, you determine whether something is fraudulent. And he said, that's always been something that the government has.

So it's not like you would make some kind of bureaucratic determination by some ministry of truth. Now, this is not what he's saying. I'm expanding on what his general idea was. He's contrasting this and saying you would have a trial, you would find these people guilty of fraud, and then you would apply the appropriate punishment. What I found interesting about that, and I think this is good,

I like to have a clashing and debating of ideas, and that's what RFK Jr. is bringing to this campaign, is a debate of ideas. I think it's very important to have that. And we're going to come up with some good ideas, and I think that idea of a corporate death penalty is a very good idea. I think it's something of a dodge for him to say that that was really what he was talking about with the Koch brothers. I mean, you can go back and look at it.

I don't have access to the full clip there, but perhaps it has been taken out of context. I don't think so, though. I think what he was saying was very particular and specific to individuals, to the Koch brothers. But I think what he says here is very true, that if you've got a fraudulent company, let's forget about the Tobacco Institute, which, as he pointed out, it was a Republican attorney general that suspended their charter and their incorporation because they were acting fraudulently, he said.

But if you've got some organization that is acting fraudulently, then let's say, for example, I don't know, Pfizer, for example. You know, Pfizer has been hit with billions and billions of dollars in fines. Or you could take HSBC, or you could take JP Morgan, or something like that, right? Fraudulent, over and over again. Well, I think that those companies, those corporations who are creatures of the state, I think that institution and that corporation should be given the death penalty.

I think it should be disbanded and I think their assets should be confiscated and redistributed to their victims, not to the government when they were found guilty with due process. I think that's a very interesting idea and I think RFK Jr. has some great ideas of some of these things.

I think he's also, though, when it comes to guns, when it comes to abortion, when it comes to LGBT, when it comes to the climate MacGuffin, he is very dangerous. He is a true believer in this stuff. And even more so, he's a true believer in FDR-style big government. So I can't support him. And I understand what people are saying when they say, well, you know, he's a true believer in FDR style, big government. So I can't support him. And I understand what people are saying when they say, well, you know, he's the person who is speaking out more and speaking out better in terms of peace and against the CIA and these eternal wars and all the rest of this stuff. And I understand that, but I have to say that I don't look to politicians to bring me peace.

I look to God Almighty. And that's why I'm not going to thumb my nose at God Almighty on abortion and these other things. Look, when it comes to guns and stuff, I understand that's a very important and effective personal thing. But when I stand before God, he's not going to ask me, what did you do to support gun ownership? He's going to ask me what I did to stop the murder of innocent lives. And that includes war, but also includes abortion. How can you say that we are going to support RFK Jr. who opposes war when you allow him to make war on the unborn or when he would allow people to make war on the unborn? How do you justify that?

How do you make war on God's design for the family? How do you make war on parents? And how do you celebrate that as core American values? That's where the Democrat Party is. And I'm not going to align myself against God because God can take us down with a war and he can take us down with many other, uh, types of things as well. Uh, I do not ever want to get myself in that kind of a situation. It would be an act of disbelief to say, well, I know he's wrong on killing and ripping babies apart.

And he's wrong on mutilating and sterilizing children and creating this moral depravity that God has said he despises as much as he despises the persecution of widows and orphans and injustice. He also hates these sexual crimes as well, as he defines them. Why would I say, well, yeah, but, you know, I don't really care what God says. I want to save my skin from this nuclear war. No, no. God can save us from a nuclear war, not RFK Jr. or anyone else. And, uh, so, uh, let's just put that in that context. And, um, and when it comes to conspiracy theories,

you know, one of the conspiracy theories that everybody has always, I didn't give him a chance to answer, defend the conspiracy theories, quote unquote. But you know, one of the big ones that everybody likes to always talk about is, um, geoengineering chemtrails and things like that. Well, you've got both the European union and the Biden administration over the weekend, openly talking about it. As I said before, you know, you just go from a conspiracy theory and it doesn't exist to, well, it's good and we're doing it and we're going to do more of it. And so now the fight is between the EU, which says, well, we've got to think about the unintended consequences of this

because who gets to set the thermostat? I talked about this a decade ago. They have had, in case you haven't noticed, there have been annual conferences. Maybe they didn't have it in 2020, but annual conferences on geoengineering. And I remember one of the papers when I talked about this a decade ago was, okay, who gets to set the thermostat? It's a done deal.

We can do it. I mean, you had right after the Vietnam War, you had a guy given a medal by LBJ because he'd changed, you know, he, he changed the weather there in Vietnam as part of their attacks. And you had the early 1970s, an international treaty against weather modification and things like that. Uh, so yeah, these people have, uh, been manipulating things, using it for their agenda. It was right after they did this international treaty on climate and weather. They started kicking off Earth Day and their environmentalism and saying,

oh, look, the weather is changing and so forth. But now they admit that they're doing it, and you've got Biden talking about doing it. They actually want to try to sequester and take out carbon dioxide, which is good for us. It's necessary for plant life, and plant life is necessary for us to survive as well. It's a symbiotic situation that was designed by God, and we don't want to mess with that. You know, you think about this, and if they're going to start spraying, it's not only no longer a conspiracy theory.

They even have an acronym for it. Stratospheric aerosol injection, SAI. They've been doing it for a while. And when you look at this, do they really know what they're doing? They're going to cut down sunlight and they're going to cut down CO2. What do plants need to grow sunlight and CO2? These people are going to, you want to talk about setting the thermostat they may be trying to reset the food supply and of course um biden now the white house

says we're examining plans to do just this and they're the ones who have the stratospheric aerosol injection acronym and um so uh you know we call it chemtrails or whatever. They don't want to call it that. So let's just call it S A I. And he's got his Ray-Ban sunglasses. And I guess that's what he's trying to do. He's trying to ban the sun's rays. He's been, he's been subtly signaling this to us for a long time with his Ray-Bans, right?

Uh, but, um, he's bragging that, uh, they're going to do it soon and there's a congressionally mandated report on solar radiation modification, geoengineering, if you will. This is the entire process. They're going to change the climate. It is real man-made climate change. And of course, a lot of the climate change, in my opinion, I am still not convinced that it is real

because it's so easy for them, as we all know, to manipulate the temperature. You don't have much of a temperature record, but they're saying if we deviate by one and a half degrees centigrade, we're all going to die. Well, we're all going to die if we kill all the plants by cutting off their sunlight and carbon dioxide. But of course, those reference bases that they're using for temperature have no basis in reality. We don't have that many temperature measurements with thermometers. They were made with mercury thermometers. We have a lot of parallax view issues.

And then they repositioned the thermometers in many cases to urban areas, even onto airport tarmacs. I can get far more than one and a half degree centigrade variation if I put my thermometer on an airport tarmac. So the whole thing has been rigged. And it's very concerning as to what they're going to do with this. We're going to take a break. And do we have our guests ready yet? Okay, good. We're going to take a break and we're going to come back. We've got a couple of guests. We're going to talk about the Soros district attorneys and how this is being abused, how they are deceiving people about their objectives, how they are falsely portraying themselves and how we can spot them.

And so we're going to take a quick break and then we're going to be joined by our guests. We've got one of them online now. We've got two guests. The other one may be joining us shortly. But we're going to be right back after a quick break. Stay with us. The Common Man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing

and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Joining us now is Zach Smith. He is a legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation. He served as an assistant United States attorney and has worked on a variety of criminal and civil matters in public service and private practice. by another legal fellow, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, Cully Stimpson, who has co-authored a book with Zach Smith. And Cully, if he joins us, I'll go ahead and introduce him now. Hopefully he'll be on. He served as a local state, federal, and military prosecutor, also as a defense attorney, and

as a military trial judge. They served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Detainee Affairs in the George W. Bush administration. And so they've got a lot of background, and they have just put out a book. It was released June 27th. The book is entitled Rogue Prosecutors, How Radical Soros Lawyers Are Destroying America's Communities. And we know this is happening, and I've talked about this a lot, but I wanted to get the guys who've done a lot of research on this, so much so they've written a book about it,

because a lot is being done with George Soros. So thank you for joining us, Zach. Great to have you on. Of course. Thank you for having me on today. Well, glad to have you here. Let's talk about this because I've been talking about this since 2017. In 2017, we had outgoing President Obama and his

Attorney General at the time, Eric Holder, and they were saying, we now need to focus the Democrat Party on these local district attorney races and on state attorney general races. And they did just that. And apparently they got a lot of money from Soros. I know in some of these particular cases, there's been millions of dollars for a local district attorney race. There was one in Texas, I believe it was San Antonio. And, uh, the, the guy was able to defeat the Soros funded.

Opponent by pointing out that the money came from Soros and that he was being funded by Soros. So he was able to beat that off, but they've been very successful in getting their district attorneys into office because there's a tremendous amount of money put into a local race. What can you tell us about the Soros connections? Because we always see the mainstream media pooh-poohing, oh, it's not Soros. It's just a conspiracy theory. What do we know about how he has jumped into this? Well, I think it's important to put these local elected district attorney races in context.

There are over 2,300 local elected district attorneys around the country and most law enforcement activities, most prosecutions take place by these local elected DAs. You know, we hear a lot about U.S. attorney's offices, the Federal Department of Justice, and it plays an important role in our criminal justice system, an outsized role in many ways. But most crimes are prosecuted by these local elected DAs. And historically, these have often been low profile, low dollar political contests. Often they're uncontested. And so when you have, you know, $50,000, $60,000 being put into one of these races, that's a huge sum of money, even in many midsize to big cities. And so, as you mentioned, what Cully and I found, we noticed there were a new group of prosecutors coming

into office who were pledging not to prosecute certain crimes, not to seek bail for defendants, to seek lower criminal penalties, even for repeat violent offenders. And so we said, what in the world is going on here? And so the more we started to look at it, the more we started to realize they had bought into this leftist ideology of not prosecuting crimes, of not holding people accountable for their actions. And the consequences are really speaking for themselves, unfortunately. And as you mentioned, George Soros and several other left-leaning billionaires, they poured in millions upon millions of dollars into this effort. And we know this has happened

because some of the money we can trace, some we can't because of the way it's been funneled. But we know that George Soros and related entities to him have given $40 million directly to fund these local elected DAs. And then in terms of other infrastructure, other funding in terms of nonprofits and foundations and all that sort of thing, some estimates put that number north of $1 billion that he's put into this effort. Wow. And, of course, he's passing the torch to his son. I think it's Alex who says, I'm far more political than my dad is.

And he was the one who had another older son who was more interested in making the business profitable but uh he he passes stuff over to his younger more politicized son so we're going to see a lot more of this type of thing an outsized influence on our system here what do you think is their ultimate goal i mean what is it that these guys are trying to do it certainly it's created chaos uh by turning criminals back out on the street i what is it that these guys are trying to do? Certainly it's created chaos by turning criminals back out on the street. I mean, is that what they're obviously focused on that? But is there something else that you see as a motivation behind this? Well, if you get a copy of our book, Rogue Prosecutors, How Radical Soros Lawyers Are Destroying America's Communities, we dive into all of this.

And we have an entire chapter on the background of the movement, the ideological underpinnings of it. And one of the things that, you know, frankly shocked Cully and I as we were researching and writing this book is if you start looking at some of the academic writings, some of the stuff that doesn't make the front page news, the proponents of this movement are very open about their goals. And they'll tell you their goal is to, quote, fundamentally re-engineer and reimagine our criminal justice system. And what they mean by that is they want to tear it down and build it back as something completely different. And the reason they want to do this is, unfortunately, many on the left have bought into two myths about our criminal justice system. They've bought into the myth that our criminal justice system is

systemically racist, which it's not. And they've also bought into the myth that we have a mass incarceration problem in our country, which we don't. If you look at who is actually incarcerated in state and federal prisons, by and large, it's repeat violent offenders. And so whenever you talk about either incarcerating fewer people or letting people that are currently incarcerated out of prison early, I think it's important to understand that that necessarily means either not locking up or releasing back into our communities repeat violent offenders. And again, in the cities where this has happened, the consequences speak for themselves in terms of increased crime rates, particularly in terms of increased violent crime rates like homicides and shootings.

And when I think of this, I think, first of all, of California. And, you know, we have, was it Eric Gascon, I think it is, the L.A. District Attorney and San Francisco. George Gascon. George. George Gascon, yeah. And he was in San Francisco, then went to L.A. And then the person who took his place was another one of these guys,

Chezza Boudin, whose parents had been in jail for terrorist acts with the Weather Underground. He was raised by Bernadine Dorn and, you know, the organizers. Bill Ayers. Bill Ayers, the organizers of the Weather Underground. So the guys are real radical. He was voted out, but of course, they were not able to do that with George Gascon.

He was able to, with technicalities, they said, well, you don't have quite enough verified signatures. So we're going to have the recall election, I think, is the way that went. But talk to us a little bit about what some of these policies look like. Give us some examples of that. I know people know about San Francisco and the absolute chaos that's there, but give us some specific examples that maybe are in your book. Sure. So, you know, broadly speaking, many of these rogue prosecutors, again, they've essentially said there are certain crimes they're not going to prosecute.

They've said they're not going to seek to hold people without bail pending their trial they're going to seek early release for many offenders and again it's because they've built you know bought into these two myths about criminal justice system i also think it's important to realize a lot of the these policies and the consequences you know i'll talk about in just a minute here, they really stem from something called the prison abolition movement. This was a movement back in the 1960s and 70s, a Marxist inspired movement, where people actually said, we don't need to have prisons, no one needs to go to prison for any reason whatsoever, which is a radical idea. And many people when they heard that rightly said, this is crazy, we're not buying into it. And unfortunately, today, many of those same goals and policies have been repackaged and are being implemented under the

guise of this rogue prosecutor movement. And so to give you a specific example, in Boston, Rachel Rollins, she was the Suffolk County District Attorney in Boston there. She actually put out a list of 15 crimes you could commit in Boston that she would not prosecute you for. And under her, I know, it's insane. It's like the purge. It's like the purge where you get a free pass to do this stuff. But it's year-round. It's not just one day, right?

Well, and to tell you how crazy this policy is, under her list of 15 crimes, someone could break into your home, they could be armed, they could be in possession of cocaine or another controlled substance, and they could resist arrest when the police showed up. But so long as the person said they broke into the home initially to find food or get out of the cold or something along those lines, Rachel Rollins wouldn't prosecute that person for any of those crimes. And so you're seeing that same type of policy being implemented in city after city after city. And look, in our book, you know, it's a tough read, but I think it's a necessary read. We highlight eight rogue prosecutors. And in each of those chapters where we highlight eight rogue prosecutors in eight different cities around the country, we have real life through crime stories that would not unfortunately have

happened, but for the rogue radical policies of these local elected district attorneys. I remember when I lived in Austin that the district attorney, after she was elected the first time I came out with, did the same thing. Here's a list of things I'm not going to prosecute. And some of these things were violent crimes against kids and things like that. It was truly amazing to see.

A lot of people, when they think about this, they think about the epidemic of shoplifting that was enabled in San Francisco by Chesapeake. And that has gotten so out of control that you've got a major, it's going to drive major chains out of business that they don't pull out of that area. And that's probably the best example of it. But there's a lot of violent crime that is out there, a lot of rape and other things like that,

that these prosecutors are saying they won't prosecute. And yet they will go to the mat, won't they, to get somebody who has a firearm and uses that to defend themselves. That's the other side of this, isn't it? Well, and I think to your point about what's happening in San Francisco and other cities where these stores are closing, I think it's important to realize, you know, many in the rogue prosecutor movement, they spend not prosecuting things like petty theft, simple possession, prostitution. They say these are quality of life crimes. They're essentially victimless, and they don't really cause any harm to society. So they're not going to prosecute them. Well, this idea that they're victimless crimes is just nonsense. And so you're seeing the consequences of that in places like San Francisco, places like Los Angeles. And so for you or I or other people, you know, driving the extra few miles when a

Walgreens or Walmart or some other store closes might not be that big of a deal. But if you're a single mother relying on public transportation, relying on the ability to go to the store, the pharmacy before or after work, having those stores close, having them reduce their hours, that's a big, big deal, a big impact on the quality of that individual's life. And so to say that these crimes are victimless, that they don't have any real consequences, it's just nonsense. And more importantly, you know, when rogue district attorneys say they're not going to prosecute certain crimes, that sends a message that a certain amount of lawlessness is going to

be tolerated. And for all of their flaws, criminals aren't stupid in that they understand the incentives they're given. And they understand that if lawlessness will be tolerated with these supposedly small crimes, lawlessness will also be tolerated with more serious crimes as well. That's right. And if we think about, again, going back to the shoplifting examples in San Francisco, they said, well, you know, we don't want to come after people for petty theft. So we'll set the level at some place. And they set it pretty high, in my opinion, you know, 900 bucks or something like that. It was just under $1,000.

We're not going to prosecute that so what was the result of that as you pointed out people understand if that's not going to be prosecuted they started organizing gangs to do this and it became a major criminal operation to uh fleece the stores uh because it was very easy to uh take that and and to uh magnify that into a business. And that's exactly what they did. And that's what's driving these gigantic corporations out of business and shutting everything down, turning it into a kind of zombie ghost town. I mean, when you look at this, they won't prosecute the shoplifting crime. They're not doing anything to help defend

people who would have an honest business. And so it is turning into just a kind of zombie town of drug dealers laying on the drug users laying on the street and shuttered businesses everywhere. Well, and again, it harms law-abiding citizens in all these communities. And I think it's important to realize, too, everyone deserves the public safety privilege. You know, if you live in a middle-class neighborhood, if you live in a wealthy neighborhood, you probably don't have the day-in and day-out petty crime and violent crime that many people in lower-income neighborhoods experience on a firsthand basis. And so one of the ironies of this movement, there are many, but one of the ironies is that many of the elected officials who are pushing these policies that are harming public safety, they get taxpayer funded security details.

But the rest of us, we depend on our Second Amendment rights and police officers to help keep our communities safe. And so, so many in these low-income neighborhoods, these lower-income communities, when policing is either lessened or police officers pull back, crime is not being prosecuted, well, that's unacceptable in so many ways. But often the people who are making the decisions to implement these policies, they don't have to bear the consequences of their decisions. And let's talk a little bit about what it does even to a coarsening of society. Certainly it's a threat to your property and maybe even your life to say that we're going

to tolerate certain levels of crime. But I know my wife is from New York and from outside of New York City. But, of course, they would have a lot of – they were going to New York City a lot, and she had brothers who would go in, and they were routinely mugged when we were in college. And it kind of leads to a coarsening of society under those types of circumstances where you start to – it just changes everybody's attitude toward everything besides the actual physical danger that you truly are in when they tolerate that type of crime. And so it is something that's very important. Give us an example of one of the cities and one of the district attorneys and some of the things that they have done there and that have really blown up. Sure. Well, I mean, there's so many stories to choose from, unfortunately.

But look, you know, you can go to Philadelphia, talk about Larry Krasner, how but for his policies, but for his failure to prosecute an armed career criminal, Corporal O'Connor, a Philadelphia police officer, would still be alive today. Unfortunately, that armed career criminal shot Corporal O'Connor, a Philadelphia police officer, would still be alive today. Unfortunately, that armed career criminal shot Corporal O'Connor and killed him while Corporal O'Connor was trying to apprehend him. In St. Louis, perhaps some of the most outrageous stories we have in our book under Kim Gardner's tenure as the circuit attorney there in the city of St. Louis take place. One example that is particularly troubling and really shows incompetence

more than anything else is there was a murder defendant and no one from Kimberly Gardner's office, the prosecutor, repeatedly did not show up to court to prosecute that murder defendant. And so you had the defense attorney emailing Kim Gardner's office saying someone from your office needs to show up to prosecute the case. You had the victim's family reaching out, contacting Kim Gardner's office. You even had the judge take the extraordinary step of sending his bail up to Kimberly Gardner's office. This courtroom deputy didn't notice saying, I'm going to hold a hearing on X date. Your prosecutor hasn't showed up this many times before. And if someone from your office does not show up, I'm going to have

no choice but to dismiss this case and set this accused murderer free. Well, guess what? Nobody from Kimberly Gardner's office showed up to that next court hearing and the accused murderer was eventually set free because the judge had to, because no one was there to prosecute him. Now, thankfully, he was eventually apprehended later, but that's no excuse for literally having an accused murderer set free back into the community simply because no one from Kimberly Gardner's office could bother to show up to court to prosecute him. And she was removed for cause, wasn't she, for that? She was removed, and that's one of the things we talk about in the book. You know,

there has been some progress made in pushing back against this rogue radical prosecutor movement as people become more aware of what exactly many of these rogues are doing, what their policies entail and the consequences of their policies. And so Kimberly Gardner in St. Louis, she resigned. There's a procedure in place to try to remove her from office. Chase Abudin in San Francisco, he was recalled by even the leftists in San Francisco. His policies were too radical, too dangerous for them. Marilyn Mosby in Baltimore, she lost her bid for re-election, and she's currently under federal indictment there in the city of Baltimore. And then in Chicago, Kimberly Fox, one of the

first rogue prosecutors, she's still in office, but she announced that she will not run for reelection. And so there's progress being made to push back against this movement. But I think it's important to realize there's still more work to be done. By our estimates, there are about 70 rogue Soros-Backer-inspired prosecutors in office around the country. There are still many more such candidates running for office. In fact, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, one of the Soros-supported candidates just won the Democratic primary there and looks well-positioned to win the DA's race there in Pittsburgh. And so the work continues, but I think one of the most important things people can do is learn about the movement, understand what it's about,

and most importantly, recognize what types of talking points and phrases and other things of that nature that candidates who are supported by this movement, who believe in the initiatives of this movement, what they say and what they do. And that way, you know, when you're going to the polls to vote, when you're talking to friends and family members, you can understand what is being pushed and most importantly, how to push back. That's a key thing. You know, I think when you look at people who've lived in a Marxist country or something like that, right, they can smell it a mile away. I know where this is headed. And so looking at your book and seeing what these people have written

and understanding that this is a movement where these people are all thinking like this, if you get that background that you got in your book as to what their philosophy to government is, I think that's going to be probably the best way that you're going to be able to spot people like this. Because just like somebody who lived under a communist government, you know how they phrase things and their worldview, and you can immediately pick it up if you've seen this. So if you've got their background, you can see that.

But give us a little bit of an idea as to how these people deceive voters. You talked about how they try to present themselves as reformers, but what are some of the dog whistle things that you might see in some of these people who are running for office? Well, the last chapter in our book is called The Way Forward, and that's where we really lay out the blueprint for how to recognize many of these individuals who are running on this rogue radical platform, and again, how to push back against them. But you know, one of the things we found as we were researching and writing this book, when many of these rogue prosecutors first ran for office, they said fairly uncontroversial things. They said they're for a fair criminal justice system. They want everyone to be treated equally under the criminal justice system. They don't want anyone to be incarcerated unnecessarily. Those are pretty uncontroversial statements that probably everyone would agree with by and large. But what happened when these

individuals got into office, it quickly became apparent what they meant by those phrases and what you or I or anyone else on the street might understand those phrases to be are two radically different things. And so in many cases, it was essentially a bait and switch that these prosecutors were implementing. Now in some cities, some of these rogue prosecutors have been reelected to office. Larry Krasner in Philadelphia is one prominent example, but there are others as well. And unfortunately in those cities, I suspect things are going to continue to get worse before they ultimately get better. It's such a key thing. You can key off some of those phrases, you know, like, you know, we want just punishment and things like that.

If that's kind of a priority for them, that might be a real telltale. And I think that this is very important because as I've said, and you said at the beginning of the interview, most of law enforcement is going to be happening at the local level. We have big high profile cases that get the federal prosecutors involved and everybody talks about them. So that creates a perception that's really where it is. But we want to strengthen and understand, first of all, the reality is that most of this stuff is happening at the local level. All politics is local. And so is law enforcement, really, for the most part. And we want to keep it that way.

And so we want to make sure that we're wise about who we put into office. And we want to make sure that we're not going to get somebody in there who's going to completely shut that down because we know the other side of that is they're going to be coming after lawful activities as well and persecut going to be coming after lawful activities as well and persecuting people involved in those lawful activities. It seems to me like, you know, as you're pointing out, some of these people like Kim Gardner has been as resigned and under threats of, you know, being impeached or whatever. And Cheza Boudin was recalled in San Francisco.

But of course, that didn't stopoudin was recalled in San Francisco, but of course that didn't stop things that were happening in San Francisco. And that's a real warning sign, isn't it? That once you get started in this path, it's really hard to turn the city around, isn't it? Well, I think it's important to realize too, what many of these prosecutors are doing, they're saying this is prosecutorial discretion, that this is within their power to not prosecute these crimes. And that's just nonsense. Prosecutorial discretion is something that's existed in American and Anglo-American law for many, many years. But what these prosecutors are doing is not prosecutorial discretion as any lawyer who's practiced in the criminal justice system, who's been a prosecutor or defense attorney or judge.

It's not something they would recognize as prosecutorial discretion. Prosecutorial discretion is looking at the individualized facts and circumstances of each case and deciding maybe to offer a plea bargain, maybe not to charge because of a lack of evidence or their equitable considerations. But the key thing to remember is it's an individualized determination. What these rogue prosecutors are doing is prosecutorial nullification. You know, in our system of government, it's Civics 101. We have an executive branch that enforces the law that is made by the legislative branch. And so the legislatures in the states where these rogue prosecutors are in power have decided that certain things should be criminalized, should not be tolerated by society, and that certain punishments should attach to those actions if an individual is convicted of committing them.

And so what these prosecutors are doing is essentially taking that legislative role for themselves and saying, I don't like these laws, so I'm going to nullify it. Well, that's not the way our system of government is supposed to work. And again, it creates a host of downstream consequences. And so to your point, you know, I think one of the important supposed to work and again it creates a host of downstream consequences and so to your point you know i think one of the important things to recognize important things to understand is getting back to the the proper allocation of power uh among the different branches of government within our tripartite system of government that we have not only at the federal level but also at the state and county levels in most places as well. And understanding that this is not the role of the prosecutor to

decide their entire categories of crimes that he or she is not going to prosecute. That's something for the legislature to decide, and it's up to the prosecutor to adhere to their oath of office and to faithfully enforce those laws. That's why it didn't surprise me to see Obama and Eric Holder say that they were going to focus on this because we'd already seen with Janet Napolitano, the DACA executive order, saying, well, we're not going to enforce the border laws. And so we're just going to categorically set aside all that stuff. Uh, with DACA, we're going to call it deferred action, but of course, they were going to defer it indefinitely.

They never had any intention of making any actions. And so, uh, she just nullified in an executive order kind of way, what the, the laws that had been passed were about the border. And so I thought it was perfectly in keeping with the philosophy of the Obama administration, that they would try to do that same thing at a state and local level. And that's really what this is, is about,

uh, as you pointed out, not using prosecute, uh, prosecutorial discretion in terms of an individual case, but just taking it as an entire, uh, category and saying,

we're going to nullify that law. Uh, but it has been a're going to nullify that law. Uh, but it has been a very effective in terms of destroying areas. And once you start going down that path, it's really hard to reverse course. Uh, and, and we're seeing this happening in city after city, as you see the crime soaring and people being, um, you know, returned, I, there was a, a, uh, press. Uh, meeting from the guy of the conservative party in canada uh pierre um and i forget how to pronounce his last um uh who was uh talking

to somebody in the press and they were giving him a hard time because he was complaining about people being uh immediately turned out and uh and, are you serious? I was just talking about how this guy got out and they committed a crime. And he talked about a handful of individuals who had literally dozens of convictions. He said, these people were committing crimes at two times a day because they would be caught and immediately released without any bail. And, uh, he said, and that's what you're advocating is do not understand. And the guy says, well, how does that help anything to keep them in jail? And he goes, well, it helps because they're not out there on the street committing crime. It truly was

amazing. And I've played that clip in the past, but that is the mindset of these people. But I think it's not stupid. I think it is deliberate. I think that's why Soros is doing that. He wants to pull down this system, as we see this in so many different ways. They want to pull down the current existing system and the current existing institutions and rebuild it back with something that is to their liking. And I don't think people are going to like the results of it as we've seen in these other cities. Is there anything else that you would tell us about your book, Rogue Prosecutors, how radical Soros lawyers are destroying America's communities? Anything else that you would tell us about your book, Rogue Prosecutors, How Radical

Soros Lawyers Are Destroying America's Communities? I hope everyone will pick up a copy, read it, and learn more about this movement. Again, the ideological background. We highlight true crime stories from eight rogue prosecutors around the country. And then, of course, the last chapter is the way forward, how to push back against these radicals and their rogue radical ideology. That's great. And, of course, thank you, Zach Smith.

And, of course, the co-author on that was Cully Stimpson. And I think it's very key for people to understand and to be able to identify these people, understand their philosophy, understand the way they speak about these issues, because this is a real key issue. And you don't want to see the kinds of stuff that we've seen happening in san francisco uh coming to where you live nobody wants that we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back stay with us let me tell you the david knight show you can listen to with your ears you can even watch it by using your eyes in fact if you can hear me that means you're listening to the David Knight show right now yeah good job and you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the David night show.com. That's a website.

Well, as a follow-up to what we were just talking about, the rogue Soros prosecutors, there's a case in Florida that just went before the Florida Supreme Court. And, of course, Ron DeSantis and the Republican legislature there has passed a very restrictive law about abortion. And there was a Democrat prosecutor, a state attorney, who said, I'm not going to enforce this law. Ron DeSantis removed him from office. Isn't that interesting? Why didn't Trump do that with any, did not think about doing that with some of the people who he said opposed him. Uh, he did fire

some people, but he fired them for, I think more personal reasons. But anyway, the Florida court voted in a six to one decision. Uh, they rejected the petition from this, um, uh, Democrat state attorney, uh, to be reinstated. He claims that DeSantis had misused his power. And I think this is interesting. You know, again, we talk about the difference, um, between the different branches of government. Where can we nullify things? Where can we appeal to a lesser magistrate? You understand that even if the courts or the governors or the state attorney, whether these parties get this right, we can make that determination ourselves in terms of the Constitution, in terms of what is right and wrong.

It doesn't mean that you're always going to be on the winning side of nullification. I don't agree with this attorney, Warren, on this particular issue. But the larger issue that is here is what is the interplay between the governor and a state attorney who is not going to follow the state law. And this particular case, this attorney lost big in a six to one decision. He said, though, rather than addressing the substance of the governor's illegal action, the court cited a technicality and avoided a ruling on the merits of this case. That was the losers, the guy who was on the losing side. Yeah, he is a loser because he wants to kill kids.

Let people kill kids. I mean, you talk about looting big box retailers, that's one thing. You talk about killing kids, that's another. Anyway, the Republican governor last year suspended Warren, accusing him of neglect of duty and of incompetence after the Democratic state attorney signed statements along with other prosecutors. He's kind of leading a movement.

Other prosecutors across the country opposing criminal charges against abortion providers or women who are seeking abortion. And let me add that these people will be the first ones to excuse criminals who burn down crisis pregnancy centers or do violence to other people. You better believe that they're going to allow that, that they will use their law enforcement powers to come after any pro-life organizations while allowing these abortion clinics to flourish. He also said that he would not prosecute people for providing gender-affirming health care.

In other words, mutilating children, sterilizing children. And his office's policies didn't charge people with some minor crimes. Now, that was kind of interesting. This is a story that was written by AP News. I thought this was an interesting choice of word that he will not charge people with minor crimes. So you mean crimes against minors? Because that's what we're talking about with this gender affirming health care stuff. We're talking about crimes against children.

Is he saying that he's not going to focus on crimes that are not important, or is he not going to focus on crimes against kids who are underage? It's an important distinction. I think in this particular case, it's a distinction without a difference, isn't it? He also challenged his removal in federal court, where he said that DeSantis punished him for being a dissenting voice and violated his constitutional right to free speech. Well, that's interesting. And that he nullified the election that put him in office. Well, that's a very interesting take on this. And I suspect that, well, he not only sued DeSantis over being

removed from office because he openly declared that he is not going to enforce the Florida law on abortion. And so he sues him in federal court. There's another federal lawsuit that has been filed against DeSantis and the state of Florida by Disney World, that also in federal court. And DeSantis' attorneys, state attorneys are saying, the federal government doesn't have any authority in this area. This is a state issue. So I think that's going to be a very difficult case for him to win. By the way, thank you, Harps. Appreciate the tip.

He says it was the Liberal Party, not the Liberal Democrats. They're two different parties. Thank you very much for clarifying that. Harps is in Australia, so he knows. I won't call them Liberal Democrats anymore. It's the Liberal Party. Again, a lot of people will say, hey, I'm'm a classical liberal i'm liberal in the classical sense of it meaning somebody who is about liberty and of course it's early part of the 20th century that that was that term was stolen by the radical

socialists in america and apply to themselves because hey they like that sounds good just like it sounds good to call yourself a progressive, but they're socialists or communists by any other name. They're just putting lipstick on a pig, but thank you for clarifying that. The liberal party. Getting back to DeSantis in Florida, attorneys for Ron DeSantis, a state agency and his appointees responded to a revamped board that governs Disney World

are asking a judge to dismiss a federal lawsuit in which Disney claims its free speech rights were violated by the takeover of its governing district. Now, isn't that an interesting thing? You know, this is a federal lawsuit. So, again, it is a Tenth Amendment issue, I think. And DeSantis and the state of Florida are saying, well, you don't have any jurisdiction in federal court over this. This is an internal matter.

And the audacity of Disney to say that for 50 years or so, they've been getting free stuff, all kinds of preferential treatment. They were a government unto themselves. Why don't you talk about Disney World? They were their own little world. Yes, it's a small world, isn't it? But it was their world. You know, they got the state to just give them all authority. So they had their own law enforcement, their own zoning, their own building stuff. Everything was, you know, they were the ones in charge of it. I remember when they opened up, there were a lot of scuttle talk about people that were injured on rides and everything.

They said, well, that's okay. You know, Disney paid the people off, they covered it up and there's nothing state can do because they've got their own little fiefdom here. It's outrageous that that existed. It's outrageous that it existed for so long. And, um, and it should never have existed. I know that when people look at this, it looks like petty revenge on the part of DeSantis, but it was an outrage from the very beginning, as far as I was concerned, uh, all of us who lived in Florida, uh, pretty much, even though we, we enjoyed going to Disney world, even though Disney world was, uh, pushing wholesome values at the time. Uh, it really is a period piece. Now that song that was done by art Garfunkel, where he talked about Disney girls and how

wholesome they were. Yeah. You wouldn't say that anymore after Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera and all the rest of them now and what the agendas that they're promoting, but look, they were acting as their own government and, and they, um, are trying to appeal that. Well, good luck with that. And good luck with jurisdiction. The federal court lacks jurisdiction over the Republican governor and the state's agency secretary,

who are immune to the lawsuit. And the governor and secretary don't enforce any of the laws at issue. So Disney lacks standing to pursue its claims, argued attorneys for the state of Florida, in their motion to dismiss. I think they're absolutely right, but of course being right doesn't mean that you're going to win in court. DeSantis took over the district through legislation passed by Florida lawmakers. He appointed a new board of supervisors to oversee municipal services.

But before the new board came in, Disney made arrangements with previous oversight board members who were Disney supporters to strip the new supervisors of their authority over design and construction. So basically what they did was they went through their charter and said, well, okay, so he's going to replace, he's going to have this new governing board. Well, we're going to take all the powers away from the governing board. It was a little bit too clever, actually. I think ultimately they're

going to lose. Certainly they have so much money at stake that they can buy not just the best lawyers, but they can buy the most politicians. So we'll see if this continues. But now that this has been brought up and now that Disney has taken a firm stance against parental rights and for child grooming, and not only they're entertaining, but also in the political sphere, I think it's going to be difficult for them in the future. DeSantis and Florida lawmakers then passed legislation that repealed those agreements. Okay, so you, in a sense, what this is similar to is somebody declaring bankruptcy, but just before they declare bankruptcy, they transfer all their assets to a family member or something like that. Do you know anybody like that? But, you know, you do something like that, it you do something like that it's fraudulent transfer this is fraudulent transfer of authority by disney and so the state government said no we're not

going to do that so then their response was to sue them for violating their speech violations of the company's free speech rights uh yeah that's something that the left doesn't really seem to care about anymore at all as free speech rights it's pretty hypocritical uh joel hirshhorn says what covid taught us about the two gop front runners he says the first step in thinking about this is to acknowledge that the u.s government did a terrible job in every respect during the so-called pandemic. Again, Joel Hirschhorn wrote a book called Pandemic Blunders. He said people should acknowledge that the one million plus American deaths

that the government attributed to COVID, this is by their own statistics, it's a failure by their own measurements. The one million plus American deaths that the government attributed to COVID is remarkably worse on a per capita basis than all other advanced and wealthy nations. And so by their own rigged metrics, they failed. So what should now become important to those wanting to choose a conservative president says that Joel Hirschhorn to replace the current failed and corrupt Democratic administration.

What is needed is to explicitly think in terms of pandemic retrospective. We need a new president that can clearly and honestly come to the correct conclusion that the U.S. government failed miserably. And so we look at Trump versus DeSantis. As Joel Hirshhorn says, first, it's important to understand that Trump went along with all the wrong policies in addressing the pandemic. He said, though, I think the Trump presidency did many great things for the country. It has always shocked me that on key issues of COVID pandemic, he supported all the wrong actions

and policies, but even worse, he says, why has Trump never openly said that he made a big mistake in listening to the, quote, expertise, unquote, of Fauci? Why hasn't he distanced himself from Fauci? Why hasn't he distanced himself from the vaccines? That ought to be the biggest red flag. I mean, you talk about Trump and his red flag stuff and Trump and his bump stock bans and his attempts to ban pistol braces that Biden has now banned. Those are red flags.

Those are big red flags. But the biggest red flag is the fact that he will not distance himself from his actions, from Fauci, from Operation Warp Speed. If the former president, writes Joel Hirshhorn, is as smart as he thinks he is, then during his campaign for another term, he should admit his big mistake as soon as possible. But of course he isn't. And his supporters knew this.

You know, the people who wanted to be able to be with the biggest crowd of conservatives, the MAGA cult, but also knew that Trump had real culpability in all of this. They were not even asking him to do a mea culpa because they knew the size of his ego and his narcissism. They just said, stop talking about this. Stop patting yourself on the back about this, at least. Just be quiet about it. And he did that for a couple of months. And then he went on with Brett Barron. He, you know, as I've played for you in the past, you know, started bragging again about his vaccine that we know has killed tens of millions of people and is still killing people.

Anyway, he says, here's a short list of the things the government under Trump screwed up. He says he ought to admit it's a mistake and ask for forgiveness, but of course he won't. Here's what he screwed up various mandates from wearing masks to taking COVID-19 shots. That's right. They're mandated under Trump at the very beginning for some of these people, but understand that they mandated the masks, right? They supported the mandates for the mask and they funded the mandates for the mask. So did he mandate this stuff? Yes, he did. Because he gave people money and the governors wanted to keep this going because they were getting so much money from, from Trump. He paid for it.

That's why I call him the producer of the film. And Trump was the director. And all of you were extras and lab rats if you participated in any of this stuff. Many kinds of closings and lockdowns that ruin the economy and individuals and school closings that have ruined many lives. Prohibitions on using safe and effective generics for early treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Even vitamin D is a better alternative to the vaccines. And he puts that in quotes that are really gene therapy products untested. Well, they did some testing and they knew what they were getting out there. I think we're going to see that happening more and more. In contrast to Trump, DeSantis did a much better job of addressing the pandemic.

By keeping workplaces and schools open, he also fought various mandates. And I would add even the corporate mandates and local mandates, just like he's fighting this state attorney on enforcing abortion. So he said in August of 2022, I'm so sick of seeing him talking about Fauci. Somebody needs to grab that little elf and chuck him across the Potomac. The only democratic presidential candidate with the correct negative view of Fauci is RFK Jr. The author of the real Anthony Fauci. It says, but Kennedy advocates many terrible policies that disqualify him from consideration.

As I said before, even as good as he is on vaccines and on peace policies, he has set himself against God. He has a view of government that is like FDR. And he is a true believer in all of the climate lies. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show as i said the support for climate is a disqualifying thing. And I think he is sincere. I think he really does believe it. And I think it's a massive blind spot that he doesn't see the connections to what was done with COVID and the COVID lockdowns, if he is indeed sincere. As a matter of fact, NBC News, you might as well call it NBC as in nuclear, biological, and chemical. NBC News did an article, How Climate Lockdowns Became the New Battleground for Conspiracy Protest Movement.

You see? That's why I say, I don't run from the pejorative term anti-vaxxer. I embrace that. Proudly embrace that. And I don't run from the label of conspiracy theorist either. Such a tired tactic. Going back to JFK assassination, all the rest of this stuff. We've seen one quote-unquote conspiracy theory after the other. Like I just said, geoengineering. Oh, well that's a conspiracy theory. No,

they've been talking about it for over 50 years. They're talking about how they're going to do it again. They're talking about it and, you know, now fighting over how it's going to be done, who is going to do it and that type of thing, who's going to control it. But when we talk about climate lockdowns,

what NBC is saying, they said, they interviewed some people they said well there's no evidence that a plan like this exists oh really uh they want you to you know not um understand this is what davos world economic forfeiture group is trying to put out there i know that mbc doesn't talk about this. They don't talk about what they put as, what is the shadowy cabal's next goal? Oh, well, take away your car, said a Londoner. I mean, we're so far into this.

I was talking about that a decade ago. They're taking all the cars, you know. And they started screaming about that at the first Earth Day. I played for you the anniversary of Earth Day back in April. I said, here's a clip from 1970, the first Earth Day. What are they doing? I'm saying, got to take your car. Why is this a conspiracy theory?

It's now a fact. They're banning cars in multiple European jurisdictions. And they've even said, well, and we're going to ban internal combustions by such and such a date, all these different European countries. So why is that a conspiracy theory, NBC? The Slander knows that's going to be the case. They've already passed the legislation to ban them by a specific date, and they keep moving that date up so they can get it sooner than 2030.

One person they talked to in London, Linda Skinner, they said, she is their model conspiracy theorist. She says this is only the beginning. She believes that COVID was developed and released by a shadowy and powerful group as a trial to see how compliant people would be. Yeah, exactly. And they think that's a theory. Almost a third of the people who took part in a recent poll

by King's College London and the BBC said it was either definitely or probably true that 15-minute city plans are a government attempt to surveil people and restrict freedom. And this is like the same people saying, well, you know, the 5G, that's there for surveillance. That's a conspiracy theory. Well, it's a conspiracy, all right. It's a conspiracy.

It's a government conspiracy, a globalist conspiracy to look at everything that you do. The people who went through the test case that Google set up in Toronto, they called it Sidewalk Labs. And you had a lot of people who are true believers in global warming, man-made global warming. And they wanted to be a part of that because that's the way it was sold to them. Just like they're selling, you know, UN Agenda 2030, it's the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It's based on the climate lies. That's why I say, if you look at RFK Jr.

and, you know, a guy who's a true believer in climate, you don't think he's going to buy into a lot of these control tactics, if even naively. And so they sell it that way. And some of these people who signed up to volunteer for this test case by Google called Sidewalk Labs in Toronto. They got out of it and they said, well, I thought we're going to be helping the environment developing sustainable stuff. But the only point of all of this stuff is for Google to look at everything that we're doing and to market that, to sell, to collect everything about my life and to turn that into a marketable

business model. It's all about surveillance as five G was being pushed by, by a, by a Trump. He said, oh, we don't want China to have this. Why it's about surveillance, but it's okay. If the, if the American government, the federal government surveils you, and it is the substrate for all of this stuff. And they've been talking about and pushing for years. Uh, the idea that they're going to be spying on you in every way possible. Everything in the Internet of Things

that is going to be scooping up all kinds of information. I talked a couple weeks ago about how, and I forget what the number was, many gigs of information be transmitted all the time by your car, the new cars, constantly surveilling everything about you. What you're listening to, what you're watching, how you're driving, not just how the speed that you're driving, but how fast are you taking curves and braking and transmitting all that information back. It is a complete surveillance state.

And it won't just stop at things that they can monetize, because they'll also be able to monetize things that the government is interested in. Your political beliefs, your religious beliefs, and all the rest of this stuff. 15-minute city plans are a government attempt to surveil people and restrict freedoms. Even when you had David Petraeus as head of the CIA saying, well, we're going to have your refrigerator listening to you. And he said, see? He said it. Oh, that's a conspiracy theory. No, he said it. He said it out loud.

These people are saying it out loud. We're going to ban your cars. We've got a date at which we're going to ban your cars. But NBC wants you to believe that this is a theory. If you look at the individuals that are complaining, spreading misinformation, and legitimizing conspiracy theories about 15-minute cities, they're often the same cohort of individuals that spread misinformation about COVID. And it's often the same language. Why is that?

Well, because it's a MacGuffin. They don't care about COVID. They don't care about a pandemic. They don't care about climate. They've got an agenda and that agenda never changes. Whether it's going to be, uh, we're going to freeze to death or we're going to burn the planet up or whether we're going to all get disease it doesn't matter it's still the same actions it's an interchangeable crisis to produce what they want which is an orwellian totalitarian society and it's amazing to me to see that RFK Jr. either is naive enough not to see the connection or dishonest enough not to talk about the connection between these things.

That's a very concerning thing because that is at the core of all of this, and he is a true believer in all of this, even as NBC is trying to push this out. As a matter of fact, we're out of this. And he is a true believer in all of this, even as NBC is trying to push this out. As a matter of fact, we're out of time. I'll, I'll talk about this tomorrow. I mentioned it before.

Nigel Farage, uh, focus is the focus of part of this as well. And of course it's just a conspiracy that they're going to shut people out financially. Yeah. That's one of the reasons why I think it's so important. Make sure you go to

DavidKnight.gold, which you take to Tony Arderman. You can make arguments from a financial standpoint about a hedge against inflation, but you need to hedge yourself against this Orwellian police state that's coming. Thank you for joining us.

Joe, we've got a problem. What? Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right? So, basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because, basically, you can't hold coffee

with your hands, right? It's scantily, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm be ready for it. You dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots drink coffee, then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we own the world.

These people, they're supporting free speech with every month they buy. Come on. These people, I tell you, well, anyway. You're listening to The David Knight Show.