The David Knight Show - 5May23 Proud Boys vs TN3; Ventilator Deaths; Pentagon's Covid War; Technoshamanism

Episode Date: May 5, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESHundreds of thousands killed from TrumpShot & Biden mandate — yet no justice for the mass murderers. Instead those 2 are frontrunners in the next "selection" 3:12 Temporal correlation between vaccine use and deaths. 8:51Germany makes a shock admission on the Covid-19 mask mandate. 18:55 Pentagon began monitoring "Covid-19 disinfo" BEFORE anyone was talking about it, BEFORE the WHO knew it existed, 2 months before it was named, 3 months BEFORE it was declared a pandemic. It was and is a WAR against citizens. 22:01Medical Martial Law, the military industrial complex and the Moderna Conspiracy 37:45 Covid Vaccines become a new source of organ donors — and fatal conditions passed along to recipients 54:41Northwestern University study shows BACTERIAL INFECTION, NOT CYTOKINE STORM, killed most people — and VENTILATORS were major cause. 1:05:13Proud Boys: Biden Admin Guilty of Political Persecution. They'll be sending a dozen people to jail for life in a hypocritical politicized persecution 1:08:04 #Jan6 vs #TN3: Which Better Fits Definition of "Insurrection"? Biden celebrated and embraced the "Tennessee 3" for a "protest" that was much more of an "insurrection" than what they will claim happened on J6. 1:18:04Will artificial intelligence take 14 million jobs by 2027? Will you be a part of THAT economy or do you want to be free? 1:38:39Ed Sheeran wins copyright case but what are issues going forward with abuse of copyright? If A.I. can create copyright claims will AI kill music, writing, art? 1:53:53"Technoshamanism": Tech Breeds Irrational "Spirituality"Materialists said science would be the end of religion. Yet pagan religion is getting a rebirth with tech as demonstrated in Germany's "Technoshamanism" exhibit. So what is breeding superstition? Is religion anti-science? What are the culture forces feeding irrationality? 2:03:45 First they came for the cars, then furnaces and stoves and now — Biden Administration Orders Catholic Hospital to Snuff Out Sanctuary Candles Tyrants hate competition from religion 2:13:41 Top western us meteorologist hits out at clickbait stories about "climate change" 2:22:09 Will RFK Jr Call for Gates or Schwab to be Jailed or Killed?He rightly says Gates is rigging "climate change" for his own benefit and "giving climate chaos a bad name". He called for jail or execution of oil executives, will he do the same for "green washing" crony capitalists like Gates, Klaus Schwab and Musk? Will he call for green subsidies to be removed as well as oil subsidies? 2:33:30 Dictator Dan Andrews defends Drag Storytime and accuses critics of pedos and groomers of "hate crime". 2:43:58"Save the Males!" Governments are Concerned About Chick Culling The same leftist "Western" governments that hate males are concerned that male chicks are being culled so they want to mandate they be aborted before they hatch — BUT THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT NOT ABORTING THEM WHEN THEY'RE MATURE ENOUGH TO FEEL PAIN. 2:54:00Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday, the 5th of May, Year of Our Lord 2023. Well, today we're going to take a look at the truth that is coming out. We've known what was happening for the longest time, at least if you listen to me. I've been saying it for a long time. It was interesting to see this morning that Thomas Massey responded to an article about the involvement of the Pentagon, the Department of Defense in Operation Warp Speed. He said it was medical martial law. And it's not just that particular article. There are articles about how they have planned this and

began with PSYOP operations before they were even talking about COVID-19. They already had a Pentagon group set up to shut down any criticism of their narrative. So we're going to talk about that, how we knew, because these documents are just now starting to come out but you could read the tea leaves pretty easily we'll be right back Yes, we will also be talking about what happened with the Proud Boys as well. And a lot to say about that as it was horrific to see the convictions that took place and the fact that we have people who are facing life in prison. Multiple convictions on felonies that could get up to 20 years each. It is an outrage, especially when you look at what happened in the state of Tennessee.

Now, that's a state issue, but that was a far more dangerous, quote-unquote, insurrection than what was done in Washington, D.C. And yet the people who led that, the people who took over the floor of the Tennessee House were lionized and honored and invited to the White House by the Biden administration, the same people that are going over the top of this. So we're going to talk about that coming up. But I want to begin with the thing that affects each and every one of us. We've had a lot of people killed over these warp shot, warp speed, GCI, Trump shot, whatever you want to call it, over these

jabs. And we've had probably over 300,000 Americans murdered by this, says Brian Schilhavi. What's going to be done about that? And yet the people that brought this to us are Trump and Biden. The two people that are the frontrunners, the two people that don't have to debate. They're so popular, they'll shut down the debates because they don't want to talk about their history. As Brian Schilhavi at Health Impact News said, 2021 will go down in history as the worst year of death by lethal injection. An estimated 300,000 people

in the U.S. killed by lethal injections. It may be quite a bit more. This is just looking at the VAERS database. Lethal injections are only supposed to be injected into convicted criminals who get the death penalty in a court of law but you know we're also using the same chemicals that we use to chemically castrate rapists we're using that on young children that our institutions

our governmental institutions our entertainment institutions and, our governmental institutions, our entertainment institutions, and especially our educational institutions are gaslighting these young kids and then using these chemicals to castrate them. And of course, many other tactics mutilate them. We don't know, but talking about the chemical castration, we don't know what the long-term effects of that are, especially on developing children. Nobody cares, right?

Just like the FDA didn't care about the genetic code injection either. So he says, starting in December of 2020, when Trump threatened the FDA, forced them to authorize experimental injections of COVID-19 shots produced by the U.S. government, funded through Operation Warp Speed program, and then continuing on through 2021 when Biden made them mandated, we have an estimated 300,000 Americans died from these lethal injections. And Brian says, and I've said it myself many times, Trump and Biden should be tried as domestic terrorists and mass murderers for these crimes. I think they should be tried as international murderers,

along with their entire administrations who participate in them. And yet both men are running for re-election as president of the United States. They are the front runners. That's the amazing thing about it. Because there will be no debates. Is this not evidence that our federal elections and all of our elections, really, for the most part, local elections, you can sometimes have a say in that. But is this not evidence that this is a selection for president?

That the voting really doesn't matter? Cases of adverse events. Yeah, we got cases here. We got cases here. Let's take a look at the adverse events and take a look at what happened. He puts it in. First of all, he puts in a number of adverse events filed for all vaccines for 2019 before COVID, 2020, just as the vaccine is being rolled out,

2021, where it's mandated, and 2022. And he said, if you look at the number of adverse events filed for all vaccines, in 2019, it was about 46,000 cases. In 2020, it went about 46,000 cases. In 2020, it went to 74,000. Then in 2021, it went to 1.2 million. And then it went back down in 2022 to 184,000. 185, actually, if you round up. And so he says the 2020 adverse event cases almost doubled by 2020. And that's just introducing this poison at the very end of the year, three weeks in December.

And it was apparent from the very beginning. That's why I said, I have absolutely no trust or faith in people like Tucker Carlson who knew that as well. They're not that stupid. Come on. If he's that same argument with Trump, if they're that stupid, don't follow them. Don't listen to them. Everybody saw this.

The people I worked with saw this and fought with me. Mike Adams fought with me writing article. I don't, David Knight doesn't know how to do math. It's not math. It's psychology. Number one. And the lying statistics that they were used were nothing but arithmetic. You know, it's not mathematics. This is not rocket science.

It's not calculus, Mike. It's arithmetic. Can you calculate percentages? Can you add and subtract? Well, he was adding a lot of false information, and he was subtracting the truth. And the rest of the people that I worked with at that point in time were as well. Makes me sick to go back over this stuff. Makes me angry every time I look at this. By the end of 2021, the number of adverse events filed in VAERS had exploded to over 1.2 million, a 2,618% increase over 2019 before they started this stuff. And, of course, he charts it out in a graph.

See if you can pull that graph up, Travis. He charts this out, and you can see, and I'll do it backwards here for you since I but it spikes up and then comes back down as you start to see the use go away there is a temporal correlation to the jab in other words a time correlation to this and then when you take a look at the deaths, same situation, except even more extreme. When you look at the deaths that were filed in VAERS, 2019, 231 deaths. By 2020, 716 deaths. By 2021, where we've had the vaccines all year, where they're mandated for half of the year, 27,000 deaths. And then in 2022, it drops back down to 2,700 deaths.

As they're starting to pull this back, grab the chart up above that. There you go. That's the one I was talking about. Yeah, you can see how this goes, the temporal correlation here uh so he said that's a 12 000 increase in 2021 compared to 2019 in terms of deaths in other words 12 times 12 times the number of deaths and he's got the charts in there if you want to see this again this is at healthimpact.com or vaccineimpact.com. He said, note that the Pfizer Moderna experimental shots were not given emergency use authorization until the first week of December 2020. Yet they made up over 80% of all recorded deaths for 2020, even though they were only available for the last three weeks.

So three weeks, and that's 80% of the reported deaths in VAERS. He says, think of the pain and the suffering that survivors have gone through, losing their loved ones to an experimental injection that their government told them was safe, not to mention the ridicule that they have to suffer from family and friends if they even dare to suggest that the Trump shot, the Trump shot, had anything to do with these deaths. And so he said, you can see the correlation between the decrease in distribution of shots in 2022 with a decrease in deaths following those shots,

but the numbers are still significantly higher than in 2019 before they began. In 2011, as he points out, this is this Harvard study that was funded by HHS in 2011, and what did they find? They found that only 1% of the adverse events were reported in 2011. Do you think that's a good correlation to what is happening now? I would say that there was no, if you reported adverse events in 2011, you didn't risk losing your job getting kicked out of the hospital having your medical license taken getting fired all the rest of these things everybody knew by the time we got to this

narrative you're not supposed to to do that and so that's i would say that it would be much less than the 1%, according to the Harvard study funded by HHS in 2011. So he says, is there any corroborating evidence to back up the estimate of 300,000 Americans killed by these shots? He says, as we reported in January of 2022, the CDC completely revamped their website at the end of 2020 and at the beginning of 2021. And they added about 400,000 deaths to their records for 2020, making it look like COVID-19 virus killed an additional 400,000 Americans in

2020. While their previous records before they tried to website showed that there was no dramatic increase in deaths in 2020, that the increase in deaths in 2021, therefore did not seem to be abnormal. This is the way they played with the numbers, Mike. And they were playing with the numbers at the very beginning of it. And so when you look at this further down the article, I would recommend that you take a look at it in detail. He said just after the first of the year

in 2021, the page that he shows disappeared from their website. Of course, you can find these things if you go back and you look at the Internet archives, the Wayback Machine. And an entirely new section was put up on the CDC's website that tracked deaths. And the total deaths for 2020 were revised to be 3.3 million. And it turned out to be a difference of about 486,000 deaths. The beginning of 2022, we could clearly see those additional deaths attributed to 2020 were basically being pre-added to cover up the deaths that were going to be caused by the shots for 2021. And we have to conclude as we look at this

and look at the flu all but disappearing. And again, that was part of the pattern. You could see, and we had reported on it for years. Before the big, before the COVID war, people I worked with at Infowars would talk on a regular basis about how they were lying to people, padding the numbers for flu. But, you know, hey, when flu disappears and it all becomes COVID, we've got cases here. Let's pay attention to the cases.

Let's panic everybody because I've got something to sell you here. Flu deaths all but disappeared. They dropped from the already record low in 2000 of 8,700 to only 900 in 2021. Despite the fact that hundreds of millions of American population were injected with experimental shots in 2021, COVID deaths, according to the CDC increased from 385,000 in 2020 to 445,000 in 2021. And so we have to conclude that majority of those were vaccine injury deaths. The other excess deaths could easily be attributed to the effects of lockdown when deaths by suicide increased drug usage also increased,

but the other corroborating evidence to back up these excess deaths was from the work of edward dowd published a book showing the increase in southern sudden deaths based on financial reports from the insurance industry and the funeral industry and we've talked about this at length as those things came out you know this is a once in a 200-year event, said the insurance company, One America. Well, it must be that this can't be things that are non-COVID deaths. That can't be that.

It has to be COVID deaths. And we know that nobody dies if they're vaccinated. Therefore, we're going to raise the rates on the unvaccinated people. This is the way this whole thing has been running. And so it brings us back as we look at all this and think about how many people have died. Where is the outrage? Does it make a difference if it's 3 million, 300,000, 30,000? What if it's 300 people and they did it deliberately. If Trump and Biden deliberately killed 300 people for a political agenda, for the military-industrial complex,

or the globalist agenda of the Great Reset, if they deliberately killed three people, why aren't they answering for it? So where is the outrage, he says? Millions of people worldwide have taken to the street to protest the tyranny of the COVID scam. In Europe, Africa, Asia, Canada, where you have the truckers, but in the U.S., Americans are debating which one of these two mass murderers should be the next president of the United States. And of course, we're focused on January the 6th.

We're still focused on what we got to get Trump back in office. Right. The it's become the basis of both of these campaigns. You know, Biden is going to use it as these, these people are dangerous and you got to shut this thing down. Trump and Biden are the left, right march into a civil war. And we got to forget about these guys that we can't put them in jail. Let's leave it to God to take vengeance on the two of them.

But let's forget about following them into a civil war. We don't need that. And I'm saying that just like I told people to stay away from Washington, D.C. on January the 6th. Makes me sick to see what's happening there. I know Joe Biggs. I hate to see him going to jail for life. Why did they go?

Caught up in this. Even as all this stuff is happening now. Enrico Terrio is taking a different tact than his lawyer. And Norm Pattis, who was a lawyer for Joe Biggs, they were saying they went there because Trump told them to go there. They were, you know, and all the rest of this stuff, pushing this towards Trump. him to go there. They were, you know, and all the rest of the stuff, pushing this towards Trump, but not Theriot. Theriot was saying, well, they're coming after us

because they want to get to Trump. Isn't that the opposite of what Trump used to always say? Trump said, they're coming after me to get to you. I'm the thing between them. No, no, no. He's put a lot of people between his opponents, his political opponents and himself. And those people are getting squished into the ground by this political juggernaut.

So I understand Enrico Terrio is going to look at that and say if they lose on appeal, the only appeal he's going to have is a possibility of a President Trump giving them a pardon. I wouldn't even trust President Trump to do that if I was them. Look at what he did to Julian Assange. Anyway, getting back to this. Germany makes a shock admission on the COVID-19 mask mandate. The German health ministry, I'm the person in charge of it uh so i guess it'd be the

guy that uh it really does fit in germany what eric peters was calling these little public health dictators gesundheit fuhrers right well i guess in germany the german health minister really is the gesundheit fuhrer, quite literally. Overall, he said, the effectiveness of individual measures Free Democratic Party, the FDP, said this claim from the ministry that it is not possible to check the effectiveness of mask requirements independently of other measures is wrong. It's an attempt to avoid an effectiveness test that is required under constitutional law. But of course, we know, common sense told you, studies have told you, it doesn't help. It actually exacerbates the condition for other people to wear masks.

It exacerbates it for other people. And it exacerbates your own health as you respirate smaller particles and they go further down. But the masks were made compulsory for all Germans back in April 2020. They kept it on for two years. And even after that, they had two German states that used the clause of declaring themselves to be a hotspot. They extended the mask mandate in those areas. And as all this is happening, Daily Skeptic, I'm sorry, not Daily Skeptic, this is RT, said Germany's had a lot of scandals related to these masks. They overpaid for the masks and they overpaid a company that was run by the husband of the health minister at the time. Nothing to see there, right?

No corruption there. The health ministry buys the masks from her husband, the head of the health ministry, and overpaid for them, by the way. And then she also got a lot of faulty masks from China that, um, I don't know if they were faulty or if they were contaminated. We had that type of situation happening as well. When they found out that they were faulty, whatever that means, perhaps

contaminated, then, uh, her idea was to distribute them to the homeless and the disabled people in nursing homes. Is this a campaign of depopulation? Is this what the Nazis did? You know, rounding up people who are disabled, elderly, let's just, you know, get rid of them. What I said before about the Pentagon in terms of having a COVID disinformation campaign monitoring this,

they began doing this before, two weeks before the WHO even knew that COVID existed. Well, before anybody was talking about this stuff, back in the middle of December of 2019, they already set up a COVID disinformation group. This is so obviously a pandemic, but we knew this now, even though these documents are coming out. We knew this because they had practiced this for 20 years. That's how we knew. It went right down the line. And so now we're seeing the documents out there that, yes, this was medical martial law. We'll get to that in a moment.

But this is a company called Grafica. They monitor online communities for government agencies. As I have said for the longest time, the purpose of social media was to get you to put everything out there so they could create a life log. That's what they originally called it. People said, well, we don't want the government keeping tabs on everybody

and everything that they do for life. And so they said, all right, we'll shut that down. And then Facebook springs up and social media springs up. And we know that all of these Silicon Valley companies were funded by these venture capital firms that were filled with people from the intelligence community. The CIA even openly created In-Q-Tel, a venture capital firm, to fund this stuff. And so this company that would scrape data off of social media and then analyze it, geospatial intelligence, looking at people's politics, their religion,

making predictions about what they're going to do, they began looking at disinformation being put out about COVID-19 two weeks before the World Health Organization even knew of an outbreak, before anybody was talking about it. You see the plan? This is not a reaction to a pandemic. This was the execution of a plan that they'd practiced for 20 years. The private firm has received millions from Pentagon and Pentagon grants and contracts. They targeted us right wing communities as the top disinformation threat from

the very beginning, even before the beginning. And so, you know, we have this situation of played the clip many times. I won't bother you with it again, but you know, Fau have this situation. I've played the clip many times. I won't bother you with it again. But, you know, Fauci, when he goes to the Milken Institute, how do we get people worldwide to take this vaccine that we haven't tested?

We don't want to wait 10 years. We want to start making money right away. We do it from the inside. We do it with disruption, and we do it iteratively, right? So he says that in October. In December, they've already got a company that is monitoring COVID disinformation. Well, there wasn't any COVID disinformation happening at the middle of December of 2019. Grafica is staffed by former DOD, CIA, and NSA officials.

They played a key role in censoring the pandemic via the Virality Project, where they partnered with the federal government. Now, this is from the Foundation for Freedom Online.com. That's excellent research. They said this company is small but influential social media monitoring and censorship firm that has received nearly seven million dollars in grants and contracts from the department of defense so surprising isn't it that the department of defense wanted to purge people with any

religious objections out of the pentagon anybody who didn't want to get the jab and they weaponized this and went to war with their own troops just as our government went to war with its own citizens. And every government did that worldwide. We already have global governance. We've had global governance in our face for three years now. All these different tyrants. And I've said it many times. Doesn't matter what their stated political philosophy is.

It doesn't matter what the party's philosophy is. They can be conservative. They can be liberal. They can be left, right, socialist, Marxist, libertarian. It doesn't matter. All of them doing the same thing. And they're doing the same thing now with climate. Pretty much in lockstep with each other.

So we do have global governance. And the corporations are a big part of that. It's a partnership. So the DOD began tracking online conspiracy theories about COVID-19 December the 16th, 2019, four days after the first patients reported symptoms in Wuhan, China.

I was not even talking about it at that point in time. At the end of December, when they started hyping this stuff and they started locking people down, I said, well, they're saying that it came from a wet market there. What else is there? Oh, the only biosafety level four lab. And so I said, we had they're saying that it came from a wet market there. What else is there? Oh, the only biosafety level four lab.

And so I said, we had to watch out for this. This may be a deliberate thing. But then as I started talking about lockdown, I said, no, that's, that's the issue. That's the issue. That's what they've been practicing for 20 years. That's more dangerous than anything. Even if they engineered some disease and their biosafety level lab. And even if they deliberately released it, the lockdown thing is more dangerous.

Because if we've got to fight a real disease, that will hamper everything. It will destroy our supply chains as we saw. Anyway, four days after the first patients reported symptoms, they've already got this thing going. The Pentagon, COVID disinformation. It was a militarized war against the citizens, and it was militarized by the military industrial complex and by the intelligence community. You know, when we look at this, it is also not just the people that have died or been injured already, but it is really, I think, a long-term injury thing, a long-term sterilization thing as well. And, you know, perhaps we should start calling it warp seed instead of warp speed

to draw attention to the depopulation sterilization aspect of this. Warp seed. A genetic code injection. Delivered by the military. And they were not even trying to hide how the military was up front and center. Oh, it's an executive order. Oh, it's FEMA type things, right? Not exactly like FEMA, but very close.

And we had the FEMA camps and other things were being talked about. So, uh, again, the, uh, December 19th through March the 17th, uh, you had December 16th last year. Um, this is actually, um, uh actually their report from Grafica and what they had to do, what they did in this article from Foundation for Freedom Online. They said, Grafica has produced a set of three network maps that capture the mainstream global conversation around coronavirus at monthly intervals. These maps were seeded on the same set of coronavirus hashtags, including hashtag COVID-19, hashtag coronavirus,

in order to allow a direct comparison in network structure and activity. So they said data collection began on December 16th, December 16th of 2020, from their own mouth. The official CDC.gov timeline shows the first cluster of patients in Wuhan began to experience an atypical pneumonia-like illness on December 12, 2019, meaning that Grafika's social media, quote, disinfo data collection, unquote,

their work began just four days later. The WHO was not informed until December the 31st, a full two weeks after Grafika had already been monitoring social media conspiracy theories about this. Chinese authorities in Wuhan did not even identify that the pneumonia-like symptoms of the hospital patients in Wuhan did not even identify that the pneumonia-like symptoms of the hospital patients in Wuhan were rather a novel coronavirus until January the 7th

and yet the Pentagon is already sitting there monitoring for when any conspiracy disinformation is going to come out about this thing that nobody else is even talking about. The WHO did not even name it, but they were looking for it. They didn't even name it COVID-19 until February 11th, 2020, and did not officially declare a pandemic until March 11th, 2020.

Yet predicting, predating rather, all of these events, Grafica was closely surveilling and working to neutralize what obscure Twitter and Facebook communities were saying online about the virus's origin. All while categorizing citizen accounts by political affiliation. And then also looking at people who had conservative audiences. As you look down their data, that cluster data there that is all different colors, that is the vaccine network. Influential anti-vaccine activists who are reaching conservative audiences. They created a network map. No wonder I was having problems on the internet. You know, I was opposing even so-called conservatives at Infowars who were pushing

the CDC narrative, who were pushing the Pentagon's narrative about this thing. And of course, I've always been pushing against the CDC on vaccines. It is truly amazing. Which communities produce and engage in coronavirus disinformation, they said. And again, they focused on people that they identified as conservative. Conservative groups have a larger total presence than liberal groups in the disinformation map. Conservative groups, 27% compared with 8% from left-leaning groups and so forth. And they tie it into support of Trump and things like that. I guess that makes reason that, that, um, explains why Mike Adams would call me a Trump cheerleader when I was criticizing Trump for what he was doing.

Because, you know, that's what, um, you know, the Pentagon and CIA is doing out there. Anybody who opposes a COVID narrative, they're conservative Trump supporter. So therefore, if I oppose it, I must be a pro Trump supporter. No, never was. And certainly not now. Uh, but, um, yeah, that's where this all began. Never was, and certainly not now. But yeah, that's where this all began.

So anti-Trump groups are predominantly involved in driving positive online communications, they said. And also saying that pro-Trump groups are pushing negative information. Where was he getting his talking points? That's what I'd like to know. I know one day as I was leaving there, he was putting up charts from the CDC. Telling people, look, we got more people dying from COVID than from heart disease and cancer. I shake my head. I could not believe the lies and the propaganda being pushed out there at that place.

Infowars. Unbelievable. Record profits, though. Record profits, as we now see with the lawsuits. You know this stuff, and I just, you know, the documents and the truth eventually come out. We're getting the documents, the receipts now, just like we got the documents and receipts with the lawsuit, showing what he was getting paid for deceiving people. At the beginning of the year and then at the end of the year, with all the January the 6th stop the steal stuff.

The April 2020 report wasn't nearly the end of Grafica's COVID censorship work. However, Grafica wrote a subsequent report sent to Twitter, encouraging them to take action to throttle or ban any attempted misinformation or disinformation. The DOD-funded disinfo firm sought to shield Anthony Fauci from criticism in much the way that it had done earlier to shield Bill Gates and George Soros. And if you remember, the very end of the year of 2020, beginning of January 2021, and of course a lot of that was related to the upcoming election protests. More so, perhaps, than this, but the same type of thing. Same people that they were coming after for the most part.

But I remember that they purged about 30,000 people off of my account alone at that point. And it caused the mass exodus of people to Gab and other platforms. So new emails reveal Fauci told CCP officials that they would get through this together. Yeah, that is exactly what they wanted to shut down. They didn't want people seeing that, still don't want people seeing that. Much of the information cited by Grafica as misinformation and disinformation was not false. But they feared that it was, quote,

too challenging for people to discern between true and untrue information. And so the self-appointed arbiters of truth could decide what content to allow and what content to censor. So, you know, even if you just give people some numbers and say, here's the number. Oh, no, no, you can't put that out. They might misunderstand those numbers. And so, yeah, when we talk about free speech, that's why I'm a free speech absolutist.

That's why I criticize DeSantis for what he's doing. You look at what these people... Nobody is to be allowed as a government organization to be the arbiter of truth. Nobody is organization to be the arbiter of truth. Nobody is allowed to be the arbiter of hate either. Anyway, Grafika is staffed by a revolving door, a former Pentagon, CIA, and NSA officials. Chief among these was a strategy executive, Chris Bain. Prior to working at Grafika, Bain spent 24 years at the CIA and seven in the U.S. Army,

where he became an infantry and chemical officer. Another former spook, director of federal programs Joanne Perry, served three and a half years at the CIA as an intelligence analyst. Meanwhile, Lauren Pinchek, the company's vice president of finance and operations, worked at the NSA and eventually rising to become the NSA's director of corporate strategy, sorry, not the NSA, but Grafica.

Before her time at the NSA, she worked four years at arms manufacturer Northrop Grumman. Well, you know, when we, this morning, as I was, you know, putting this together, I then saw this tweet from Thomas Massey. And he said, he retweeted this article from brownstone.org, proof that the vaccines were a military-backed countermeasure.

And so it's not just the disinformation campaign that is coming from the Pentagon and started two weeks before anybody, WHO or anybody is even talking about this. They've already put together something to shut down any disinformation about their coming narrative. And they also, uh,

back this, um, the, these, um, you know, evidence of how long they had been putting this together with Moderna. And that runs through the Pentagon runs through Fauci and NIH.

And, uh, so Thomas Massey retweets this article from Brownstone and he only says is medical martial law and so I retweeted that I said yep been saying medical martial law since the executive order 13 March 20 I was attacked by the ADL and Daily Beast in April 2020 for saying that how did i know well they practiced it annually medical martial law for 20 years beginning two months before 9 11. that first one was dark winter you've heard me talk about that many times but um you know when we look at the program that was there uh it all runs through the pentagon it all runs through the Pentagon.

It all runs through Fauci. And again, RFK's book about Fauci chapter 12 is excellent. The germ games. And he ties Fauci, the CIA, the military industrial complex. He ties them together with all these germ games where they war gamed and practice this and propagandize the people who are going to be running it from the top and did it for 20 years. And they also, as part of 9-11, and I've said many times, and I'll say this again, not only was it military martial law,

but this COVID-pandemic was the second shoe to drop from 9-11. They actually did dark winter two months before. One week after 9-11, they had the false flag anthrax attacks. And then two months later, they put out the legislative foundation for states to enact to do to us what they did in 2020. So Sasha Olatipova writes this article, Brownstone, proof that the vaccines were a military-backed countermeasure. She said, this is a high-level review of the manufacturing contracts

between the U.S. Department of Defense and Moderna. Moderna's injection is co-owned by the U.S. government, funded by the defense research grants for years, received intellectual property transfers from the U.S. government, in addition to preclinical and clinical research work conducted for Moderna by the NIH vaccine research with Fauci. Fauci did this for them. The NIH and Moderna each have a separate investigational new drug number

for this product. So both the NIH and Moderna were working in tandem, sharing intellectual property rights and so forth with all this stuff from the very beginning. Now, how did I know about this? I didn't see these documents. Well, I knew about it because I looked at the history of Fauci and Slaoui. And they went back to the swine flu thing in 2019 where they developed very rapidly and rolled it out without any testing pandemics. And that was the one I've talked about it many times.

They were caught by the officials in Scandinavia who saw the adverse reactions. And it took a while. It took about a year for it to show up in young children. Young children, it shows up earlier for it to show up in young children, young children. It shows up earlier than it does for older people. That's why they began with older people and went down to young people with this war against us, but it started showing up. They started developing narcolepsy, uh, catalepsy where they would freeze.

We saw some of that with some of the COVID things, but it was a much bigger deal with pandemics. And so they had worked together. They had done program after program together, Fauci and Slaoui, and they were working together with Moderna. And I said it at the time because when Trump came out to talk, to introduce Operation Warp Speed, you remember, he had all of these pharmaceutical executives around a table. And it was so obviously orchestrated. He asked the first one, how long is it going to take you to do it? And of course, the first one had the longest timeline.

That's not fast enough. He goes to the next one. How long is it going to take you to do it? And they're a little bit shorter. And the next one and the next one. And then he gets to Moderna. And they say, well, we've already got the ability to do it. We're going to turn your body into a vaccine manufacturing facility.

And Slowy was no longer working. I think it was GlaxoSmithKline that he was working with when they did the pandemics. He was working with Moderna. He was one of the big guys at Moderna and he was brought in by Fauci and Trump to run Operation Warp Speed.

No conflict of interest there, right? In Germany, they're looking at this and saying, wait a minute, the health minister bought a bunch of masks and paid too much for them from the company that her husband runs. But we are not supposed to pay any attention to the fact that the operation warp speed, the guy running operation warp speed is going to pick Moderna, the company that he used to work for. Everybody said, wait a minute, this is a conflict of interest. And he says, okay, after they made the announcement, he says, I'll sell my stock. Well, the stock had skyrocketed because they said, well,

Moderna is going to be the first one out with a vaccine. So everybody runs out and buys Moderna. Slaoui sells his stock and makes a cool $10 million profit over the weekend. And says, why you guys told me I had to do that. It's just pump and dump. It's just amazing to see that thing roll out. And it was pretty obvious that Trump knew what was happening. He goes, puts all these people in order, you know, and now we're going to end up with our,

you know, grand finale here, drum roll. Oh, we've already got it. We can already put it out there because we're going to use your body to manufacture this stuff. It was so staged, so phony. And the players and their history told you everything that you need to know, just like we knew with Remdesivir. We knew that Fauci had tried to push that for Gilead two other times. He tried to push its use with AIDS, push its use

with Ebola, then he's going to push its use with COVID. And in every one of these cases, by the definition of effectiveness, it was ineffective. By the definition of safety, it was unsafe. A very dangerous drug that never did anything, but Fauci proclaimed it the standard of care by changing the way they would do drugs, the way they would evaluate drugs. So it is, we did know this, the objective of all this, says Sasha Latapova, though this gets interesting, the paragraph includes feel-good sounding words which cover up the true intent

to declare an unrestricted biochemical, radiological, and nuclear war on Americans to subvert consumer protections under the pretense of a pandemic response. And in this paragraph, they talk about a whole nation effort.

They say the Department of Defense and Health Human Services require large-scale manufacturing of vaccine doses in support of the national emergency response to the coronavirus. And a whole government response. And she talks about that language. She says when we talk about whole of nation language,

it can refer to the mobilization of nation in a time of war. And that's the way they operate this thing. It is the COVID war. We're going to use the military to deliver it. We're going to use the military to fund it. We're going to use the military to shut down anybody speaking against our war. In the new era of unrestricted fifth-generation warfare, however, this language seems to be used to signal an overt takeover

of an entire country by a rogue militarized force, typically by pretense of some sort of manufactured crisis, typically from the inside. Yeah. Yeah, we do it from the inside with the disruption and chaos and we do it iteratively. I found numerous references. She said to this technology terminology in the press going back several

years in the U S related to military things like cyber warfare, a whole of nation response, but also in Chinese Singapore, and Australian press, one very interesting and thorough explanation of the whole-of-nation chimera was a Philippine source describing the use of this approach by the militarized government regime that took over all government branches

and entire civil society. In other words, it describes the installation of a fascist totalitarian structure, which we still have in place. We still have that in place. All of the fascist totalitarian structure that was part of the model health state, uh, emergency powers act.

I always get the order of those things wrong, but that's, you know, look up those words, search engines. We'll put them in the right order for you. The thing that was put out two months after the anthrax attack and 9-11. When you look at that, that is a blueprint for fascist totalitarian government,

and it is still there, and the laws are still there at the state level. The ability of these public health people to do anything that they want is still there. And now we're changing the international rules to allow the WHO to initiate this instead of some big pharmaceutical executive put in place by Trump, Alex Azar. No, instead we'll have some Marxist politician like Tedros in charge of the World Health Organization doing it. That's what they're working on. And that's the change of the rules.

And then, of course, that is the most immediate threat. There's also a threat from the pandemic treaty. The changing of the rules is the most immediate threat. I highly recommend readers, she says, to visit the link to the Philippine story. And she's got it here in this article. Because remarkably, the language used is extremely similar to the U.S. government's pronouncements related to, quote, COVID pandemic response. And Operation Warp Speed, unquote. Did the U.S. government writers plagiarize Duerte?

Or do the Globo mafia captured cartels signal to each other and their superiors this way? Well, again, it is a globo-mafia. And we see the same thing as I've said. Every country against its citizens, regardless of what their political philosophy is even. Whole of nation is closely associated with whole of government terminology. And, of course, public-private partnerships. So beloved by the sellouts in academia, pharma, medicine, and defense, public-private partnerships are another closely associated term, says Sasha.

Well, I thought it was very cynical to when Trump called it his payroll protection plan. It's the PPP. Well, they've always talked about PPP as in public-private partnerships. And whenever they say PPP, your response should be, don't PPP down my back and tell me that it's raining. That's what Josie Wales said. Because that's what it is. Finally, she said,

it's clear that the clinical trials are absolutely irrelevant to the approval of the injections by the FDA is the large scale manufacturing of these substances does not depend on successful execution of these tests or trials. It was performed in parallel. So that means that any testing that was being done was just an exercise to fool the public. And I said that as well. We knew that as well. So wait a minute, they're already manufacturing the thing and there's talking about the test.

You know, they're going to run this thing. They don't care what the results are. They're talking about how soon can we get this out? They don't care. Trump doesn't care about the test. Nobody cares about the test. So you're starting to see the information come out now. But again, you can put the pieces together. If you knew the players, if you knew what they've been doing for the last 20 years and all that had been reported, it was there. Many of the people who reported it refused to cover it because they could make money off of it. That's the people who reported it refused to cover it because they could make money off of it. That's the bottom line.

And if you go back and you look at the global scientists, whose job is to control the narrative, they're now being named. And this is coming from the expose dash news.com out of the UK COVID narrative architects have surprisingly few experts on their team, actually, to push the narrative. If you look at somebody, and again, they're based in the UK. So they're looking at the guy, Sajid Javid,

who became the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care during this pandemic. Where did he come from? Well, he had been Chancellor of the Exchequer, and then they put him in health care. It is a tale of how he went from J.P. Morgan to running the pandemic. And isn't it interesting that we just had in the last month, Jamie Demon, the CEO of J.P. Morgan, saying that the government needs to start using eminent domain for our purposes so that we can, you know, for private purposes,

so we can make this green agenda deadline of 2030. Well, I think that this whole thing was a kind of eminent domain confiscation. You go back and you look at the PPP thing supposed to help the small businesses. Really? Those that Trump had already said were non-essential. More than 50% of the money went to 5% of the big companies. Trump administration redefined what a small business was. First, they said, well, we're going to do this and we're going to limit it to helping the small businesses because they're the ones that we shut down. We gave a monopoly to the big businesses and we said, Main Street, you shut down.

Wall Street, go for it. You're essential. Main Street, you're not essential. All right, we're going to help those people. And we said, main street, you shut down wall street, go for it. You're essential. Wall main street. You're not essential. All right. We're going to help those people. We got a PPP program. And what did they do with that? They redefined what a small business was.

Trump did. And as Goldman Sachs banker at the treasury department, Steve Mnuchin. Uh, so, uh, the career path of this guy, Sajid Javid, uh, he began working at JP Morgan and then he went to Deutsche Bank for a while. Then he was brought into government. They put him in charge of being the chancellor of the Exchequer, which is like the treasury department there. And then, um, he, uh, ran the pandemic. Then they moved him over to the health department because he's an expert on this, right.

Uh, being a, uh, a JP Morgan banker makes you an expert on public health, right? Uh-huh. Yeah. Not if it's a real disease, but if it's this, it does make you an expert on how to run this stuff. Because it was financial warfare as well as chemical and biological warfare against us. And so he runs that through. And then when he's finished with his financial war against the middle class in Main Street,

he quits his position there as UK Chancellor, and he goes back to JP Morgan. He is also a digital member of the world economic forum. And even though Boris Johnson banned members from attending because, you know, Hey, it looks bad. Everybody's on to Davos. So don't go. Okay. Don't go. I know we've all done it in the past and I know we've got the talking points. We don't need to go, but javid went to davos in january of 2020 as the stuff was starting to kick off getting his final you know fine-tuning the working orders i guess and all this stuff it's so obvious where this is all coming from and so i'll just add one more thing here you know i did a program a couple of days ago we talked about organ donors and China now they're taking political prisoners and killing them to remove their organs and so this article

also from Rhoda Wilson at the expose in the UK have victims of kovat vaccines become a new source of organ donors. Think about this. The layer upon layer upon layer of this. You kill people with a vaccine, and then you extract their organs and sell them for profit. And then those people die because those organs are damaged. Because it transmits the same. This is, this is heinous on several levels, but it also shows what these Trump shots are about because the pathogen or

whatever, what they gave these people, the stroke, the donors, I mean, not the donor, it killed the donors. And then the recipients die from the same thing.

A whole other level to show the toxicity of these Trump shots, these genetic code injections. And this particular story, they're looking at New Zealand and some of the things that came out of there, and the particular test case that they looked at leaked out of the wellington region health data wellington is the capital of new zealand an incident of strokes requiring hospitalization was up by 25 the rise in stroke incident began before the arrival of covet in

new zealand because they locked everything off but after the vaccine rollout had begun. So they were kind of an interesting situation. Being isolated as New Zealand is, before they had really any COVID issues, they had vaccine issues. A pre-pandemic 2016 paper found that victims of fatal strokes are generally robust sources for organ transplant donation, especially if they are young. The one exception was the need for caution with livers to be transplanted from those who died as a result of immune thrombocytopenia. Well, a September 2022 paper reporting on kidney transplants from 16 victims of COVID vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. That is another one of these things like myocarditis and pericarditis that has now become household terms, essentially.

VITT is what they call it. So we had 16 victims of the vaccine. They got 30 organs out of those 16 people, and they sent them to the UK. Five of the recipients had, and that's 17%, had concerning test results following surgery, and two of 17%, had concerning test results following surgery, and two of them lost the organ. And they went on to describe, however, the outcome as favorable.

The American Journal of Transplantation in July of 2021 presented a far more concerning picture. Out of 10 donors who died from VITT, 10 donated 27 organs in total. Three of these organs subsequently fail. Two had impaired function. And one patient died of a cardiac arrest. There were seven major thrombotic or hemorrhagic postoperative complications among six recipients, that'd be 22%, within nine days of the transplant.

The authors concluded, first of all, early major thrombosis or clinically significant bleeding. Second, possible transmission of pathogenic lymphocytes, characteristic of blood clotting associated with strokes. In other words, the VITT deceased donors may have somehow passed on aspects of their illness to the organ recipients. Now, they would not say that it was because of the vaccine. But we would see that this is something that's been frequently happening with vaccine recipients. They would die, they would take the organs, they would pass it on to the other people, and they would have this as well.

And they said this additional case report, and I have a link to it, presents photographic evidence of a kidney from a VITT victim in preparation for a transplant showing clear evidence of tissue death and bleeding in the kidney that may be associated with vaccine-induced injury that caused a stroke that was actually concentrated there. So let's take a look finally at the ventilators. We've looked at masks. We've looked at the control of information starting even before that started. The work with Moderna, the patents,

the shared intellectual property, the partnerships between Fauci and Slaoui for a very long time. We knew about all of that stuff. Now we've got more documents to support it. And I said, the only thing that really surprised me about the warp speed thing was how Pfizer and BioNTech got in there ahead of Moderna. And of course, there's been some lawsuits claiming that they stole intellectual property from him. That's how we found out about some of these intellectual

property transfers. Moderna was supposed to be the one to run this through. It may be that they gave this information to Pfizer because Pfizer had the manufacturing capacity that Moderna had. Remember, Moderna had been in existence for 10 years. Their name was originally pronounced Mode-NRNA, and they were, you know, their name was originally pronounced mode in RNA, and they were all about MRNA treatments, whether they were vaccines or other things, but they had never had a product go to market. So they'd never manufactured anything. I think that's why they pushed this over to Pfizer. Uh, but, uh, we also see, and this was sent to me by a listener, appreciate it.

It was an article about a study finding what was killing people on the ventilators. And it's the same type of thing that was killing most of the COVID patients. It was not a cytokine storm. This is Northwestern University. They said secondary bacterial infection of the lung. Pneumonia was extremely common in patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 with a PCR test. Affecting almost half the patients who required support from medical ventilation. Scientists at Northwestern University found that a secondary bacterial pneumonia that does not resolve was a key driver of death in patients

who had a positive PCR test. So they died with a positive PCR test, but they died from pneumonia. And we knew this all along. We had a pulmonologist later who came out. We didn't know this at the time. But we did have testimony from people saying, look, everybody that's putting on these ventilators is dying.

I think the ventilators are killing people. And so they found that nearly half the patients who had a positive COVID test, PCR test, developed a secondary ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. They were killing people with this intubation, the invasive ventilators. Remember how Trump pushed that. Remember how he demanded that Ford and GM shut down their factories and that they start manufacturing these things,

and how he berated the CEO of GM because they weren't producing enough of these ventilators. And later on, we found a guy who spoke out against it. He'd been a pulmonologist for decades. And he says, I couldn't understand why they were pushing this. It didn't make any sense at all to me. We also talked to Pandemic Nurse. That was the name of the book, the nurse who wrote that book. And she said, you know, she believed that this was a real thing. She was working in Florida.

She wasn't seeing any patients. Everybody was saying, hey, New York is where it's all happening and it is the epicenter globally of the worst-case scenario. So she went up there. She volunteered. She wanted to help people. She put her life at risk. She believed all this stuff.

She went up there, gave them her credentials. They waited several days, and they called her in. She was surprised at that. Then they called her in. The guy's walking around. He says, yeah, these people were putting them on ventilators. It's like 90% of them die. And there was no pandemic.

They were killing people with the ventilators. The scientists also found evidence that COVID-19 does not cause a cytokine storm. That was what was being hyped at info wars. That was, they really were hyping that. The term cytokine storm means an overwhelming inflammation that drives organ failure in your lungs, your kidneys, your brain, and other organs. If that were true, if cytokine storm were the underlying cause of a long length of stay that we see in patients, we would expect to see frequent transitions to states that are characterized by multi-organ failure. but that is not what we saw.

They were dying from bacterial pneumonia and more than half of them. It was caused by the ventilator and the rest of them, it was exacerbated by that. So yeah, dying with a PCR test that has been magnified by 1.1 trillion times. One of the biggest frauds ever perpetuated on mankind. One of the biggest crimes ever perpetuated on mankind. And yet the two people at the very center of it are our presidential candidates. And probably one of them will become president. And when one of them doesn't become president like Trump,

that will be an impetus for a broader civil war. And so we'll talk about the proud boys verdict when we come back. oh We'll be right back. you're listening to the david knight show all right i've got a couple messages here from travis he says ask people to give the stream a like it helps to boost it so that other people can see it that's a good point thank you tra, Travis. Appreciate that. Uh, so yeah, uh, if you see the stream, like it, you know, whether you're watching it on Twitter or any of the other places that you're watching the live stream, it could be D live rock, Finn rumble, any of these places. It helps to make it more visible. If we get more likes something, we haven't been asking people to do ask people to, you know, forward the links to the program or the videos or the podcast that we put up. But yeah,

if you'd like it, that helps a great deal. Thank you. And, um, he also points out, uh, if you'd like to give directly,

uh, you can also find us on subscribe star. Um, we are still getting donations with Zelle and with cash app, but we're also getting people complaining that they can't find us on both of those things. So I don't know. I mean, everything on the internet, uh, is kind of flaky for me for some reason.

I don't know. It's just me, I guess. I'm a marked man. I don't know what the deal is. It's like, I can't even put up a Christmas music channel on YouTube and they take it down. And we're going to talk, we're going to lighten up in a little bit. Uh, after we talk about the proud boys, we're going to lighten up and we're

talking about artificial intelligence, copyrights, Ed Sheeran, good news is he won his case, but we'll talk about the issues with that, uh, coming up. We've got a lot of, uh, things to talk about that are not, not heavy subjects. Uh, but I want to begin with the COVID war, uh, because that is so central. And then again, you know, the end of 2020, the reason I got fired was because I was pushing back against this, you know, stop the steel stuff, save America, January 6th, all that stuff. I did everything I could to try to warn people off of that. And it makes me sick to see this happening to Joe Biggs.

Washington Post reporting the verdicts yesterday. And there was a little bit of hope a few days ago. The jury was asking for instructions. And as I pointed out, the definition from the prosecution as to what a conspiracy was. I mean, you can have people who had different goals about everything and it's still a conspiracy. You know, they're trying to do different things.

And if they just even talk to each other, they've got different things that they're working on, focused on whatever, but no, no, just call it, wrap it all together as a conspiracy. The most criminal, one of the most criminal trials I've watched unfold. Of course, I've seen a lot of them in retrospect. Things like Ross Ulbrich, the fact they gave him multiple life sentences for running a website.

That's what it's about. So when we look at this, if there was violence, charge somebody with a riot or something like that. But when you look at what is being done, thousands of people charged, more are being scooped up all the time with these geofence warrants and things like that. They just arrested another former FBI agent who was there cheerleading for Trump. It's so sad to see this happen to people the jury deliberated for seven days you had um enrico terrio joe biggs a couple others found guilty on

31 of 46 counts the one evidently that they were having issues with and that's you know when they asked for instructions and the kind of things that they were asking for is people said, well, obviously there's at least one charge and, or one defendant that they're, you know, not solid on, they don't have unanimous consent on that turned out to be Dominic Pizzola. And he was acquitted of seditious conspiracy. And then the jury hung on 10 other charges. They could not come to a conclusion on it. Tarrio did not testify at the trial, but he contradicted his defense team's portrayal, their argument to the jurors that he was made a scapegoat for Trump and for those in power.

Instead, Enrico Tarrio embraced hardline Trump backers' claims that he was being used as the, quote, next stepping stone to get to Trump. He said they're trying to get to the top, and they're trying to manipulate the 2024 election, he said, in a call from jail. So does he still not have any clue as to what's going on? I've said that many times, you know, just the opposite of what Trump says. Trump is not between us and them.

He's thrown all kinds of people under the bus so that he can escape in the bus. You get traction. On Rumble, Geesebusters, thank you very much for that tip. I appreciate it. He says, Trump is a profiler, a two-legged rat. Yeah, I agree.

I agree. On Rumble, Pub Social Media says, thanks for covering Sasha's analysis. Catherine at Baileywick News would be a great interview. We'll have to look it up. I'm not familiar with her.

I'll see if I can find that. So anyway, as I said earlier, Enrico Terrio may still be drinking the Kool-Aid or he may be trying, hoping that he could get a pardon if Trump were to win. But as I said before, I wouldn't count on it.

Just ask Julian Assange. He would never pardon Julian Assange. As a matter of fact, were to win but as i said before i wouldn't count on it just ask julian assange who would never pardon julian assange as a matter of fact it was under his so-called department of justice and his so-called attorney generals you know barr used to be he's deep in the cia deep in the bush group you know all these people, they hate the Bushes and everything, right? You do realize that Barr was a Bush guy, right? After the church committee hearing where the CIA was, you know, odious to everybody who paid any attention to that. They made it about assassinations and they made it about, you know, giving people LSD and other stuff but it was

really the whole point of the church committee hearing as well as the pike committee hearing was that they were spying on the american people and that's why the outcome of it was the foreign intelligence surveillance act they didn't put anything in there saying you can't assassinate foreign leaders they said you can't spy on americans because they were spying on americans from the very beginning without a warrant. And they were doing it through the phone system. They would, you know, they had these, they would use the telephone company that had been given a government monopoly to do that. But anyway, after it was discredited, there's one guy who wrote a book called Company Man.

And he said, I watched those church committee hearings and I said to myself, they need a good lawyer. And he was the guy who came up with that term, enhanced interrogation, as a euphemism for torture. The torture that was used to obtain lies about weapons of mass destruction. The lies about weapons of mass destruction were used to put us into the Iraq War, And the person who did all the coverup of it, Gina Haspel was made head of the CIA by Trump, just as they decided they would rebuild the, uh, the intelligence agency, rebuild the CIA. And so George HW Bush, who, you know, plenty of evidence showing that he had a long history of the CIA.

But at that time he supposedly had no connection whatsoever to the CIA. And so they put George H.W. Bush in as head of the CIA, and he brought in Barr as his number two, and they rebuilt the CIA. Then when he becomes president, Barr became, I think, perhaps the youngest attorney general we've ever had. And then Trump brought him back in. I see the CIA connection to Trump, to Trump, to Trump, to Trump over and over again. He's not against the deep state.

He's the deep state's puppet. So, um, anyway, uh, they went after assange because the cia doesn't like him and trump didn't do anything to pardon julian assange because the cia doesn't like him and it was this cia assistant to the bush family bar who you know got jul Julian Assange where he is right now in that prison. Of course, it began under Obama, but they escalated it. Even after the basis of, you know, arresting Julian Assange disappeared, Barr, you know, prosecuted this even harder to get him put into a prison where they're essentially harder to get him put into a prison where they're

essentially trying to kill him. A special counsel, Jack Smith is investigating where the Trump and those around him broke the law and seeking to hold on to power by fanning false and incendiary claims that the election was stolen, pressuring state and federal officials to assist the effort, sending thousands of supporters who heard him speak at the January 6th rally to march to the Capitol.

This is the Washington Post writing. But the reason this is interesting is because, as they point out and many others point out, this truly is an effort to get to Trump. And it was necessary for them to use people as scapegoats to get to Trump. There's been 14 people now who have been found guilty of seditious conspiracy. But by saying we've got 14 people who have been convicted by juries of seditious conspiracy and who was the leader of that conspiracy, and then they can point with a special counsel to Trump.

Now, the problem with all this is that Trump is still commanding so many people who are so devoted to him, fanatically devoted to him. They see him as the sinless Messiah who will rescue the Republic. There is no hope other than Donald Trump. How many times have I seen people put that up on comments on videos? This focus on January the 6th, this focus on Trump is going to push us into a civil war. Both Biden administration and the Trump administration. They're the yin and yang of this civil war that they're trying to push on us. We need to get rid of both of them. Just abandon them and move on.

If we don't, they're going to drag us into a civil war. So, Ethan Nordean, Joe Biggs, Zachary Rayl, found guilty of seditious conspiracy. Convicted of three different things. Seditious conspiracy, conspiring to obstruct, and actually obstructing. Now, I don't know what the third one is. Two of those, they could get up to 20 years each. The third one is a felony.

I don't know how long they could get. So the sentencing is still there. We still haven't had the sentencing, I think, for the other people who have been found guilty, like Stuart Rhodes. There's been no sentencing of that. These people are looking at 40 to 60 years in jail, lifetime sentences for everybody. And there's absolutely nothing that anybody has shown that would justify that.

We see riots happening all the time, and I'm not supporting any riots, and I'm not supporting people attacking the police, and I'm not supporting the police attacking people either. And again, I compare this to what happened in Tennessee. And when you look at what happened in Tennessee, these Democrats led a mob to come in and shut down the legislature for gun control. Now, that's what they're saying. It's a seditious conspiracy if you try to overrule

the operation of the government. Well, that's what they tried to do in Tennessee. And they got inside. And the state police were not all armored up like, you know, Greek phalanx or the Roman legionnaires or something. They didn't have shields and armor and helmets and all the rest of the stuff. And they didn't start fighting people with billy clubs or gassing them with tear gas.

If they had, it would have been a very big situation. Instead, what the state police in Tennessee did was they used their bodies as shields. And they got hit. They got shoved. And they got to the legislators, and they were shoving the legislators. They were trying to shield the legislators in Tennessee. So the people got in. They were able to shut the legislators in Tennessee. So the people got in. They were able to shut down the doing of business.

You had these three people, the Tennessee Three, took the floor with a bullhorn, took the House floor, refused to yield it, were leading the mob that was up in the gallery, trying to get the mob down onto the floor as well. You want to talk about an insurrection? By every definition that they have used for January 6th, that was an insurrection. And it was far more successful in terms of shutting things down. It was far more successful.

They actually got their hands on the legislators and were pushing and shoving them. Nobody got their hands on Nancy Pelosi. Shutter the thought. Anyway, the, the, but you know, that didn't happen in January the 6th.

And what also didn't happen was you didn't have police overreact. And I think instigate violence. The other thing that you didn't have happen was you didn't have a massive number of agent provocateurs and informants there. And just around the Proud Boys, as it came out in this trial, 52 people who were FBI informants or agent provocateurs. And this is why I say I don't want to focus on Ray Epps. And what about those other 52 people?

You know, Ray Epps, he is the Rodney Dangerfield of this event. We've got to go inside the Capitol. Fed, Fed, Fed, Fed. Nobody believed him. He got no respect. Ray Epps, he really was like Rodney Dangerfield. No, the people didn't come to Washington, D really was like Rodney Dangerfield. No, the people didn't come to Washington DC because of Ray Epps.

They didn't go into the building because of Ray Epps. He may be an FBI provocateur, but he didn't provoke anybody successfully. I don't think, uh, it is very suspicious that he hasn't been charged since they have overcharged so many people. But, um, you know, it is, um, anyway, getting back to this, the jury didn't find that Pazola, uh, was part of the conspiracy, but they did find him guilty of, of obstruction.

Because in addition to assaulting police, he stole a riot shield. He smashed out a window that was then breached by rioters. And so all five defendants were convicted of conspiring to block lawmakers and police from doing their job. Isn't that what happened in Tennessee? And yet these people were hailed by heroes by the Biden administration. The Biden administration, you want to talk about how politicized they are? You've got these people who actually didn't just conspire to block lawmakers, but they did block lawmakers. And some of them were elected lawmakers leading this thing. And when they kicked them out of the legislature,

unfortunately they didn't do it permanently. I think that, was it Montana, I think that learned the lesson and, um, the person that they, um, did, they didn't kick him out. Uh, but what they did was they said, you're not going to, um, uh, be able to come a more effective way to do it because they're, um, you know, the, after they kick these guys out in Tennessee, they're liberal, um, councils or whatever, you know, the, the, uh, county or city government sent them back in and appointed them back in. So, but still, uh, Biden honored that. He celebrated that. He condemned the people who are the legislators who are being pushed and shoved. He said it was democracy to shut down the legislative process.

No, it was one of the Tennessee legislators said, hey, you got a problem? Go file a bill. These guys are nothing but professional protesters. And that's how they got in. That's how they got in that's how they got elected and even when they went to washington they joined a protest against biden after he honored them and he really deserved that didn't he but it shows how politicized this whole thing is um so they declared a mistrial after jurors reported that they could not reach unanimity over whether to hold all five men responsible

for aiding Pozzola's destruction of government property and another Proud Boys member who threw a water bottle at an officer. Compare that to the Tennessee Three. All the defendants are expected to appeal the verdict. Joe Biggs' attorney, Norm Pattis, also no. He said the haters will crow. The government will cheat and thump. He said it was a difficult trial.

The appeal is promising. Much love to the boys and their supporters. So again, 14 people now have been convicted in three separate trials of seditious conspiracy this is so over the top that darren beady at revolver news had focused on you know he called um stuart rhodes an fbi informant inside, uh, somebody who was working for the FBI. He said the same thing about Enrico Terrio. And he said the same thing about Ray Epps. Now, uh, when they came out with the, um, and I looked at it and of, you know, you can

make an argument that since Ray Epps was on the you know most wanted list that um and then they took him off and nothing has been done to him and they've gone over the top with everybody else you say okay that's suspicious i thought it was suspicious that enrico terrio was not there that day they had taken him out on this nonsense charge and so he wasn't even in washington that day and he had been been an FBI informant in the past, convicted of crimes and had been an informant. And so I thought it was most plausible that Enrico Terrio would have been an FBI informant. But when they came after Stuart Rhodes and the Proud Boys

with this seditious conspiracy thing, the response from Darrenren beattie was this is so over the top they'll never convict anybody of this you know nobody's been convicted of this is like a civil war thing that they decided that they didn't want to use why because they didn't want to have a civil war anymore they were sick of the killing and so even as they came up with this charge of seditious conspiracy which could have been applied to all of the people in the confederacy they decided no we don't want to go there because all that's going to do is we start arresting people and putting them in jail

that's going to restart the civil war they didn't want that we do want a civil war now though right that's what these people i don't want it but that's what they want and that's why they are pushing this civil war law that even after the civil war they said we don't want to do this because it's going to escalate stuff they want to escalate this stuff but uh darren beatty looked at it revolver news and even after stewart rhodes was charged and Enrico Terry was charged, the guys that he had accused of being FBI insiders and informants and provocateurs and so forth, he said,

no, that just underscores the fact that I'm right because they'll never be found guilty of that. So they overcharged them with this absurd charge, knowing that they won't be found guilty, and that's how they protect them and keep their cover and you know as these guys have been convicted there's been a deafening silence from darren beattie about all this stuff he hasn't backtracked on what he said about enrico terrio he hasn't backtracked on what he said about stuart rhodes and again i said at the time well anybody is there, I would believe it more so of Enrico

Ontario, but now he's facing decades, the rest of his life in jail. So I was wrong about that. You know, my initial understanding of that. And I, you know, when we look at this, why are we focusing on these lower level people? Because we know that it was Trump who pulled everybody in. But again, it's so that we can distract away from the people who grifted and lied to their own people. And I've said that is the crime.

I don't see a crime happening on January the 6th from these people, except for some violence, and that's not something that you go to jail for the rest of your life. These people have already been under harsh conditions for a couple of years. And I think that's enough punishment for any violence that was done, especially because who instigated that violence? Was it the police and the way that they acted? But there should be some penalty if people got violent. But we've seen a lot of people who were not violent who got put in jail.

People who walked in because they stood aside and let them in. And if we're going to have that standard, our whole system breaks down if we don't have equal application of the law, equal protection under the law, and we don't. This is obviously highly politicized. I think the best way to see it is to compare what happened in Tennessee and Biden's reaction to it. Compare that to January 6th, the Tennessee 3, and Jan 6th.

That shows it right there. And we don't need to focus on lower-level people when we look at that. According to Pozzola's attorney, at least 40 undercover informants were involved in the riot. And, of course, Enrico Terrio's attorney identified 52. 52. So why do we focus on one?

I don't understand. It is really just to draw attention away from Donald Trump, in my opinion. Prosecutors insist the conspiracy began on December the 19th, 2020. At 1.42 a.m. on December the 19th, Trump tweeted, it is statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 election. Big protest in December on January the 6th. Be there, it will be wild. Now, the fact that these prosecutors in this particular case are

focusing on the beginning of the conspiracy being December the 19th shows that they're trying to tie Trump into this. According to the Justice Department, that tweet prompted Terrio and Biggs to formulate plans to radicalize the group. So it was necessary for them to rig a conviction for Biggs and for Terrio to come after Trump. You know, I wrote an article on, so that was on December the 19th. I wrote an article on December the 14th, and that was when the results were sent in from all the different states of the electoral college,

uh, the delegates who had been designated by official delegates. It doesn't matter that every political party has a slate of electors and, um, you know, for some of these electors to say, well, we,

we voted and we want Trump. Of course they did because, you know, every political party, it's a winner-take-all system, state by state. And so if you got a presidential candidate on the ballot, as we did with the Libertarian Party, you send in a slate of Libertarian electors.

And Karen and I were electors one year for the Libertarian Party. But we couldn't say, we want thearian party to, uh, candidate to win. And, and here's our votes. Oh, you have to be officially recognized and you get officially recognized by, uh, the board of elections, uh, which is under the governor, uh, under rules that are there at the house. And so I had said on December the 14th, I said, okay, it's done. Now the results have been sent in.

You got a couple of places where the Republican slate of electors held a press conference and said, but we want Trump. It's like that has absolutely no basis whatsoever because they weren't sent by the government. So I said, it's done. And I said, all the stuff that is happening now at this point on is obviously just a grift and to make money. I said, don't fall for it and don't go to January 6th because there's nothing that's going to come of this. They're not getting a hearing in courts and they're not using any of this money to contest this in courts.

The electoral college results have been sent in. Thomas Massey said they didn't give us anything to work with. We didn't get another slate of electors. If we'd had two different slate of electors from any state, then Pence would have had to decide which one he's going to recognize. And if the legislator sent one and then the Board of Elections under the governor sent a different slate of electors, Pence would say, well, I don't know.

I'm going to go with the ones from the legislature. That would have put it into the Supreme Court. That's the only way they were going to get a court hearing. But they didn't make the case to the legislatures whatsoever. So I said, there's not been any effort. Here we are, you know, middle of December, six weeks in. There's been no effort whatsoever to contest any of this stuff. They're just raising money off of this.

And now they want to send you in on January the 6th. What do you think you can accomplish? Nothing can be accomplished with that. I said, it's just going to get you in trouble. It's going to be used to attack everybody who doesn't even go. And that's what's been happening with all this stuff. It was simply a grift. And so this happened on, so the conspiracy began on December 19th. I was fired on the 17th after talking about that all week. About calling Stop the Steal a Grift because Alex had been grifting people

over the preceding weekend. It mattered more to me to stop people from going to this thing. But, they went. So, the next day, Terry O. created an encrypted chat to discuss, among other things, plans to travel to D.C. for Trump's speech on January the 6th. Discussions resulted not in an armed, violent attempt to overthrow the government, but in a haphazard plan with no cohesive execution.

Yeah, that's the other thing about this. Yeah, we're going to say that these people, unarmed, no plan whatsoever, we're going to overthrow the government. They didn't even have a plan as to how they're going to, uh, you know, get changed the votes. Some people stopped at food trucks on their walk from the rallying point at the Washington monument to the Capitol grounds,

like all good insurrectionist on a coordinated and deliberate mission trip do sarcasm, appropriate sarcasm. I'd say from American greatness.com op-ed piece, uh, the mob showed up. They were armed. Says the prosecutor. No, they weren't. They were armed.

They were angry. And when Trump pointed them toward the Capitol and told them to fight like hell, that's exactly what they did do. No, they were not armed. They were angry. Uh, but again, uh, this do. No, they were not armed. They were angry. But again, this is how they're going to portray this. The committee also suggested that the special prosecutor Smith could pursue seditious conspiracy charges against Trump.

Quote, a jury has already determined beyond reasonable doubt that a conspiracy existed under the seditious conspiracy statute. As the leader of the Oath keepers and at least one other individual were convicted of seditious conspiracy for their actions now this is an older quote there's now 14 people that they have convicted the burden of proof for the conspiracy charges is shockingly low consider the instructions given to jurors what the government must prove is that two or more persons arrived at some type of an agreement to try to accomplish a common and unlawful objective. But it wasn't even that tight.

During the closing statement, Monroe told the jury, a wink and a nod represents an agreement to join a conspiracy. It doesn't have to be a plan. It doesn't have to be coordinated. They didn't have a plan. So this is all about throwing these people under the bus so they can get to Trump. January the 6th has resulted in charges against more than 1,000 Americans so far, with perhaps 1,000 more arrests to come.

There is no reason not to go for the golden ring for this prosecutor. And so that's what he will do. He will, whether or not he can get a charge from this, he will go after Trump. Now, I had new Prisoner, New Number Six, New Number Six sent a clip. He's covered this, and Gateway Pundit has covered it. Again, talking about Ray Epps.

My concern is not about Ray Epps. My concern is about turning people away. It's about time, isn't it, now, after three years, and all these people's lives wasted? Isn't it time that we turn away from Trump and stop following this guy into a civil war? Yeah, guilty verdicts of the most consequential January 6th trial will be green lights for the Justice Department.

They go after Trump. Go after him. I don't care. He deserves to go to jail. The way I look at it, as I said before, he and Biden ought to be brought up before an international tribunal and charged with mass murder. And so if you want to throw him in jail for an insurrection,

the way I look at it is the same kind of stuff that happened with Dennis Hastert. The guy was a pedophile. Everybody knew it. They had a statute of limitations. They couldn't do anything about it. So they sent him to jail because he took money out of the bank in a structured way so that nobody would notice it. Even the judge who sentenced him referenced his pedophilia.

They knew what it was about. The crime that Trump committed was against his own people. He betrayed his own people. He threw them under the bus, got them thrown into jail, and as he was leading them, this Pied Piper picked their pockets. And yet, they still cheer him. And if he gets convicted of this stuff, we have a lot of them who will want to have a civil war.

It's absolutely pathetic. Субтитры создавал DimaTorzok Thank you. Analyzing the Globalist's Next Move globalists next move. And now, the David Knight Show. All right, welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about artificial intelligence. We've been talking about artificial politicians and artificial pandemics let's talk about this artificial intelligence thing and we're seeing article after article now 14 million jobs will be slashed globally by 2027 due to artificial intelligence and esg standards says the world economic forum That's what they would like to see happen. Is that going to happen? Do you believe that?

See, I'm not so despairing of all of that. They do want to take all of our jobs, not because of artificial intelligence, but because of their ESG standards, because of their UN 2030 agenda, because they're smart cities, because of their 15-minute cities and all the rest of this stuff.

It's their net zero. They want to take all of our jobs, not just 14 million of them. And if we don't oppose the climate MacGuffin and the rest of this stuff, we will lose all that. But will artificial intelligence take 14 million jobs? Well, think about self-driving cars, for example, right? We were told that that was going to be the way of the future. And yet, as we saw this thing rolling out in San Francisco, you had the GM cars, uh, the cruise, I think it was, uh,

they were doing all kinds of crazy stuff. One of the craziest things they did was they all went to one intersection. It's kind of like, it reminded me of, you know, from Toy Story where they got those little green aliens that are in the pizza planet and you try to get them out with a claw. The claw is our master, you know, but they're all. So I just imagine all of these cruise cars going this one intersection. They all go, oh, just create an amazing traffic jam. Now these things have failed epically. And so they're moving away from it.

You have, um, uh, these tech companies are shutting down these divisions and saying, you know, this, this really isn't ready for this shit. And so maybe it'll go that way. As Brian shall have, he has pointed out several times. He said, look, this is the third wave of artificial intelligence hype the other two have crashed and burned you know it was going to be the wave of the future and everybody poured astronomical amounts of money into it and went belly up they waited a while they did it again went belly up we're now in the third wave of this

so we'll have to see what can happen with certainly the technology we're seeing some new types of things and all this technology uh if you as a matter of fact they they put this some artificial intelligence in the uh in a rope one of these robot dogs from boston dynamics these real creepy things um with the kind of insect legs that, uh, bend backwards. But, um, it was, um, having a conversation with people that were there, you know, they're telling me, uh, tell me about your late. Well, you know, at such and such a time, I went to room 47 and we found two thermal anomalies there, but we investigated that and it was, and this is the robot dog talking. Uh, it was better than the types of things that you would typically see in Doctor Who or whatever, 30, 40, 50 years ago.

And he would give it instructions and it would understand them and execute those instructions. It'd say, you know, you're a little bit close to me. Will you back up and go backwards? And it walks backwards and says, how's that? You know, that type of stuff. And so, you know, we've seen some unusual things and uh clearly here's another example of it you know straight out of hitchhiker's guide the galaxy listen to this let me show you something

invisible devices should feel so natural to use that you almost forget about their existence. You'll note that's me and my voice speaking fluent French using an AI speech model. That's part of my own AI. Very much like the D babblizer from hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy. Instead of sticking a fish in his ear, however, um, which for him, he's got a little thing on his shoulder, on his chest, rather like a, you know, like a star Trek logo or something. He touches it and hear the click he speaks and then comes back in his voice with the appropriate inflection and imperfect french

so we're going to see some things like that that are going to happen uh is this revolutionary is this a sentient being no it's not but there is a religious aspect to all this stuff, and we'll get to that in a moment. But will there be 14 million jobs slashed by 2027? For the longest time, they've been predicting this because they want this. They've been planning for this. As I've said many times, by 2030, we've seen predictions, one of them coming out back in 2013 from South Korea saying that by 2030, you will have 50% unemployment in the transportation industry. You'll have like 70 to 75% unemployment in white collar jobs like lawyers and doctors and things like that.

So there's going to be some places where there's going to be people who are replaceable with some of these robotics and artificial intelligence. But the good news for us is that these 14 million jobs that are gone are going to be largely people who decide that they want to work in this system. If we're going to survive, we need to be working on a parallel society. We need to have things that are going to work in the real world. We need to know how to build things and to be independent of them, to have our own parallel society, our own way of compensation. So we're not drawn into this CBDC control, by the way, I put in a plug David knight dot goal for Tony Ardaban, if you want to actually hold real money yourself and not be dependent

on this system, uh, but, uh, we need to start thinking about a parallel society. And if we have a parallel society where we get away from this CBDC and the rest of these control structures, then you're not gonna really care about whether or not you've got a job with Google or not, right? We have Insider, a publication, you know, they have business Insider, but you know, just Insider in general, lays off 10% of its staff after it says that they are going to incorporate AI tools like chat GPT into their workflow. Well, you know, garbage in, garbage out. They've been producing garbage for a long time.

They've been producing propaganda for the government. Operation Mockingbird type of stuff. If you're going to be mockingbird media, yeah, you got a real problem. You know, who needs you? Who needs the people who are going to read the news scripted by the CIA? Who needs a news presenter? They can create a pretty face or a handsome face of somebody that doesn't even exist. And that's already being done.

I think it was the United Arab Emirates where they did it. I thought it was kind of funny. They fabricated a woman that doesn't exist just put together what they thought were attractive elements to have her read the news in arabic to people um she was a western woman she looked kind of scandinavian she was blonde i thought well that's interesting kind of form of cultural misappropriation, I guess you could say. Didn't make her look like one of their people. Made her look like a blonde European woman speaking Arabic.

Not wearing a hijab or anything like that either. Not wearing a mask. Any of that stuff. So you can create this fake person. She looked very real reading it. And, and, uh, speaking in whatever language that they wanted. If you're just going to be repeating the government narrative, they can replace you with a machine very easily.

And if you are a publication like insider, that is just pushing government narrative, uh, that can be done by, uh, you know, they can take talking points, give it to AI, and they can put together a script. You don't need to have people to do that. They probably already have the script anyway, if they're going to be working for the CIA with this. But there's other ways that, you know, look at warehouses. Are these robots going to be able to replace people in the warehouses?

A warehouse robot, they got video of it, collapses after working 20 hours straight. Now, this thing was being, you know, it's humanoid. It's got two arms and two legs and standing upright. And it's moving boxes around. And they said, well, it was a success because it was capable of executing all the tasks that we gave it.

And from that standpoint, they're right. I mean, once, you know, it's just a technology issue to make the thing more durable. But, you know, just, just collapsed after 20 hours and they say, well, maybe, you know, we don't have to worry about being replaced. Why would you want a job in a warehouse moving boxes? Again, this is the way they're going to use you. They're going to use you and have been using people as cogs in a machine. Why do you want to be a cog in a machine?

Let a robot do that type of stuff. We don't want to be a cog in the machine of a news organization either. Let a robot do those kinds of tasks. Absolutely not interesting. They said Digit did experience some degree of failure, as in he was out of running for a time after collapsing. The AI company, on the other hand, bragged of a phenomenal success rate of 99.99% for jobs completed by the warehouse bot.

And again, a lot of these jobs are things that we would not want to do. Working for companies that we don't want to work for, in a system that we despise and loathe, that will be used to enslave and to monitor and surveil us. Let them have their AI stuff. The problem is it'll be used as an adjunct, as a weapon against us. And one of the ways that it'll be used as a weapon against us is even in copyright issues.

Will they use this stuff to shut down real writing? Will they use it to shut down music production or real artists' work, all these other things? It has a lot of different sides to it that are that are concerning but i talked about ed sheeran and how there was this claim that he had copied a song that was done by marvin gaye 39 years ago um i think longer than that i think he's marvin gaye died 39 years ago and so his music is now by owned by corporations and lawyers and they're out there looking for who they can sue and uh the plaintiff in it was also a co-writer of marvin gaye's who was also dead and it was his family that was there and so i played for you the um rick beato

had taken the two most similar parts of the song made sure you know transpose one of them so they were in the same key played them back to back but even he said and he didn't play the disparate parts he played the part that was most like it. And he said, but the lyrics are different, the melody is different, and I forget which part of the song, whether it was the verse or the chorus that was completely different. The jury has now found for Ed Sheeran. And this is what he had to say. Right. Good morning, afternoon, everyone. Thanks so much for being out here. I'm obviously

very happy with the outcome of the case and it looks like I'm not having to retire from my day job after all, but at the same time I'm unbelievably frustrated that bassist claims like this are allowed to go to court at all. We've spent the last eight years talking about two songs with dramatically different lyrics, melodies and four chords which are all so different and used by songwriters every everyday all over the world these chords are common building blocks which we use create music long before let's get it on was written

and will be used to make music long after we are all gone they are in a songwriter's alphabet our toolkit and should be there for all of us to use no one owns them all the way they are played in the same way that nobody owns the color blue. Yeah, or the letters of the alphabet. And what is he talking about? Well, anybody who's played music knows that the chord progression, that's probably 99% of all the songs, especially probably 99.99% of all the pop music that's out there,

is 1-4-5, the tonic five the tonic the sub dominant and the dominant chord progressions it's a big part of classical music even but it's really heavy in terms of pop music and so he said this is nothing that's no different than the letters of the alphabet or the color blue and nobody owns that nobody should but of course his co-defendant in it ironically was Warner Music Group and Sony Music so it was the heirs of marvin gaye's co-writer who argued that this was a copyright violation of that song that is you know 40 some odd years old warner music of course says that they have the copyright to happy birthday and they will take

down videos and stuff if somebody's got happy birthday in the background and a lot of different instances, it also said that if this happens, he says, I'm just going to give up my music career. Uh, but then as you heard him say there, it looks like I won't have to give up my day job after all.

Uh, but he was still upset about it because he is also facing, uh, claims over this song from a company that is owned by an investment banker, David Pullman, that has a copyright interest in this same song. He was just found that he was not copyright infringement. And that's how this stuff is happening. You know, the copyright law is completely out of whack

because it runs for too long. Uh, there is an argument to be made that it should be there, of course, for the life of whoever created the content. And then they extended it and said, well, and their family, you know, for a period of time, but now they make it longer and longer and longer. They want it to run in perpetuity because now you've got these companies and these investment bankers that are going out and buying this stuff, and they want it to last forever. And that's another way to shut down what everybody is doing, is with these copyright claims.

Last year, he also won a copyright battle last year in London over another song from 2017, The Shape of You. This one was Thinking Out Loud was the name of his song. I don't know it, sure. I'm just not familiar with what he has to do. When Gay's heirs won a $5.3 million judgment from a lawsuit claiming that Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams' song Blurred Lines copied his song, Gay's song, Gotta Give It Up. Well, again, this is just games that lawyers are playing. But I bring this up again, not just to give you an update, but because it also applies with artificial intelligence having patents and copyrights. We just had a Supreme Court case saying that AI cannot hold a patent. But it's still up in the air as to whether or not they can have copyrights.

If they have copyrights, will artificial intelligence be able to kill art and music? I mean, they could very rapidly go out there and create so much content and then, you know, litigate it and shut it down from anybody doing anything. Of course, we've already had MTV pretty much shut down music single-handedly by making it visual instead

of musical and having people doing auto-tuning and, you know, getting attractive women scantily clothed, dancing. That's what music has become about. It isn't about music anymore. And we've also seen in Washington State, one way you can shut down music is shut down the music program so nobody learns how to play.

The only way that you play is by pushing the play button, right? And listening to what the AI has created. Oh, they shut down the music programs in Washington State. In one school district, they said it's white supremacists to play a musical instrument. Reuters reports that Supreme Court upheld the U.S. Court of Appeals' decision to determine that only humans can hold patents. A computer scientist named Stephen Thaler

created an artificial intelligence program that designed a drink holder prototype. He applied the AI designed beverage holder for a patent, but the U S patent office rejected the application. The computer scientist appealed to the Supreme court and they rejected the hearing thereby upholding the lower court's decision. So if AI can't hold patents or trademarks, then what about copyright law? Generative artificial intelligence's relationship with copyright law is uncharted legal waters

and presents unique challenges. While there's an argument that generative AI creates unique works, one thing mires the debate. Every AI needs to be trained on existing creations, usually without the creator's permission to produce its own. The heart of the issue lies with the fair use doctrine. Well, the heart of the issue lies with the same discussion as rick beto pointed out um was um you know was ed sheeran or anybody else were they influenced by what they heard

right you listen to a musical style or you listen to a particular musician are you going to be influenced by that that's the thing that's really difficult i've listened to music composers say you know you you may not even realize that you're copying something that you're listening to you may not consciously do it you may think that you've got something new and then you go back and you oh wait i that was in that other song it's getting increasingly difficult for anybody to do anything that is different it's one of the reasons why in the early 20th century you started i think you started having these people come up with, you know, Schoenberg and these other people

coming up with atonal music. It was really more mathematical than it was musical, just to try to get away from, you know, the standard forms that are there, which is what makes it all the more amazing that people like John Williams can take the symphonic form and take, you know,

the, the music framework that we're all familiar with and come up with something that is new and creative and original and moving after all of this time, because it has to be, you know, going back to Schoenberg and these other people if it is completely uh different from what people have heard before they can't relate to it there has to be some element of commonality there for people to be able to relate to the music that's part of

what the one four five thing is everybody has heard that so much that you can kind of, in a sense, anticipate that resolution that's going to happen with that chord progression. But you have to do something that is different. And so it's that mixture of something that people are familiar with, a framework that they understand, and then throwing something in there that is unique. And that's what makes John Williams' work so amazing, that people have been doing what is essentially romantic music style. That's the emotional style of the film scores that he does.

It's really kind of a carry-on of the romantic period. And people have been doing that for, you know, really great composers have been doing that for a couple hundred years. And to be able to continue to do that and to do it in a unique way is what is truly amazing and then he has to do it precisely timed that's the other thing about it that's why when he said it at 90 plus years that he was going to retire and do just composed music and not do film scores because the film scores are so demanding in terms of timing. But now he's going back and doing another film for Spielberg. So anyway, Getty Images, the stock photo supplier, sued Stability AI for training its program on 12 million photos from Getty.

And again, as a deep learning program, you could look at this and say, well, is that just like somebody being influenced by a composer? It could be a classical composer, it could be a film composer. Somebody could be influenced, and most are. What are your influences? You'll typically ask an artist.

You listen to Charlie Parker, if you're into jazz, sax, or something. Is he your influences? They'll typically ask an artist, you know. You listen to Charlie Parker. If you're into jazz, sax, or something, is he your influence? Are you going to start? And if you do, and you listen a lot, you try to imitate Charlie Parker to learn from him. You're going to start sounding a bit like him

if you practice enough. And so, again, it's going to be a question of, I think, if somebody were going to argue in favor of the AI, which I would not do, but you could argue, well, this is an influence issue. When the artificial intelligence looked at Getty Images, 12 million photos from Getty, though, the thing that got busted on was the fact that when it produced its quote-unquote own work, it recreated the company's watermark in the image. Travis, you were saying the other day when we did the transplant thing that you keyed in with Dolly, the artwork, you said you keyed in something about China and Chinese prisons or something. Yeah, I put in Chinese prison camp.

It's like, you can't use this. This is an unsafe term or something along those lines. An unsafe term. So you had to put in prison camp. You can put in prison camp and it's fine, but you do Chinese prison camp and it becomes a problem. This is why I call it chat LGBT. Xi is also banned.

You can't generate images of Xi on mid-journey. Really? Yeah. What about Winnie the Pooh? Have to find out. That's probably double banned because it's Disney and a communist dictator, right? See, that's it. That's what I'm saying.

These things are not what they portray themselves to be because they're so highly controlled. You can't trust anything that they say, anything they do. They're looking at terms. They will lie to you just like me. They sound just like mainstream media. If you ask questions about the vaccine or about the pandemic or about climate, it won't let you use terms like Chinese prison camp. It won't let you do any parody pictures of Xi.

But of course, you can do Trump all day and you can do Biden all day, but can't do president. She, I pointed that out before with the satire program, uh, uh, puppets, uh, satire program that they have in the UK called spitting image. And they have in the images that they created, the characters, they, the satire is vicious except for she, she, they make them look perfectly normal. In the images that they created of the characters, the satire is vicious. Except for Xi. Xi, they make him look perfectly normal.

And they never make fun of him. And so I go, okay, the BBC and these Marxists who are running this satire, they don't want to make fun of the CCP. So the European Union is working on its own AI copyright laws. but then the question is, what about AI-generated music? AI voice cloning is already all over the Internet. However, the pop artist Grimes has a unique take. She debuted an open-source AI that allows anybody to use her voice. But, of course, she charges 50% commission on any song

that takes advantage of the program. So, you know, that's where we are in terms of the effect that AI is going to do the government narrative, you don't really have anything to worry about in terms of being a reporter because there's absolutely no way that chat GPT would touch any of the topics that I'm talking about with any truth. So that's not an issue. But I want to talk about the religious aspect of this. You know, we talked about art and that type of thing. And, of course, religion is another key aspect of the human existence. As Breakpoint points out, they said there's now an exhibit in Germany. Dortmund, Germany has an art exhibit called Techno-Shamanism.

Techno-Shamanism. They said, as many people have said, from John Calvin to William James to a French theologian to a historian, Louis Auguste Sabatier, they said humans are incurably religious creatures. As Calvin said, the heart is an idol factory, right? So the wholesale rejection of the supernatural is really over the span of humanity. It really is a quirk of Western secularism. Supernatural is dismissed by people, children of the enlightenment, many scientists, they'll reject that and say, oh, that's nothing but superstition.

There's not any supernatural, there's just superstition. And we're going to move beyond that with science. As a matter of fact, that's nothing but superstition. There's not any supernatural, there's just superstition. And we're going to move beyond that with science. As a matter of fact, that's what Karl Marx said about the supernatural, about religion. So he said, you know, communism will bring an end to religion. A lot of people believe that science would bring an end to religion. And yet what you see happening is that science is actually embracing the supernatural and the spiritual in a pagan way. The New York Times article about this exhibit, Techno-Shamanism in

Germany, they titled the article Space Pagans and Smartphone Witches, Where Tech Meets mysticism. I said connections between technology and esoteric ancestral belief systems is what this art exhibit is exploring. They have, from one of the artists there, he put up a cyber witches manifesto, which urged readers, among other things, to use smartphones and tarot cards to connect to spirits

and manufacture do-it-yourself devices to listen to invisible worlds. According to the New York Times, this is an example of the rising interest in pagan and occult practices among people who are spiritual but not religious. What does that mean? Well, that means that you're kind of freelancing it, right? You don't have any text that you evaluate to see if you think that that is God writing to you. No, you're just going to do it on your own,

whatever you feel. Spirituality is all over our feeds. The self-help guru Deepak Chopra has co-founded his own non-fungible token platform, which is a reading tarot cards on TikTok. And the AI-driven astrology app CoStar has been downloaded more than 20 million times. One Brazilian artist that is exhibiting in this German techno shamanism exhibition organizes festivals where participants use robots to quote connect with ancestral belief systems and the natural world and so you know I've had people reporters that went to Burning Man told me in person

that they went to see what was happening there and they said there was this exhibit that they went to see what was happening there. And they said there was this exhibit that they witnessed where they had a lot of Silicon Valley billionaires were going there and hanging out, smoking dope and taking DMT and other stuff like that. And they were telling everybody they were channeling whether they were pulling people's legs or not. They said they didn't believe that was the case.

They seemed like they legitimately believed that they were getting technology given to them as they were engaging in this pharmakia. And so whether or not that is true, I think it is kind of interesting to look at the fact that this is rising at a time when, in spite of what Karl Marx said, that communism would bring an end to religion. We've had a lot of people who are scientists who said, well, science is going to bring an end to religion. It's going to bring an end to any belief in the supernatural. The reality is that you've had a lot of scientists, fundamental scientists, who were Christians. People like Isaac Newton. He wrote more about Christianity than he did about physics and math. Or you have somebody like James

Clerk Maxwell, who came up with Maxwell's equations, electricity and magnetism, relating those things together. And that's what set off Albert Einstein in trying to find a unified field theory because Maxwell was able to unify essentially the electrical forces and magnetic forces with his equations. You have somebody like Blaise Pascal, a mathematician who actually came up with Pascal's wager. He said a rational person,

a rational person, he said, would look at the alternatives of believing in God and following God versus not following God. He said, look, if there is a God, we'll start out with the other one. If God does not exist, he said. and you live your life as if he did, you have a finite loss of pleasure and some other things that you would have done, just living life your way. Of course, those of us who are Christians know that there are real benefits to following God in terms of just take a look at what godless societies are like versus societies where people live their lives under the code

that we believe has been given to us by God. So there's a real pragmatic advantage to that. Let's just forget about that for right now and just say that, well, you could have lived life as just indulging all your senses and pleasure. Well, you would have a finite loss of that if there were no God. That would be a finite loss. But he said, if there is a God, then you are going to have an infinite loss of infinite gain, right?

And so it'd be the worst possible thing that could happen to you, and it would happen for eternity. And you would be losing the best possible thing that could ever happen to you, far more than you could ever imagine, and that would be for eternity as well. So Pascal put that out, this mathematician, and he said this is what a rational person would think. But today, in spite of and maybe because of technology, we're becoming less and less rational. Isn't that interesting?

You know, we had these highly rational individuals like Isaac Newton and Maxwell and Pascal. They were Christians. And yet today, as we become more and more pagan, we become more and more irrational. Why? Because we're more and more focused on the visceral, on the emotional, on the sensual, on the moment. That's why I call it secular. It lasts for a second. And so that is where we're going. And so there's really kind of a paradox, isn't it? The scientific advantage that we have, for the most part, I mean, there are people who are scientists,

but now they're being told that they're racist, white supremacists, that type of thing. Science is racist, math is racist, knowledge and achievement is racist, and so forth, but increasingly, as they develop these advanced things, as Arthur C. Clark said, I think he was the one who did the quote initially, saying science that is sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic. And so now people are treating technology as if it were magic. And so now you've got techno-shamanism. And it's being done by people who are not rational thinkers.

These are people who are just out for whatever experience they can get. Visceral, emotional, sensual, as I said. And so it's actually taking us in the other direction. And we're losing rationalism as um uh you have with the um this article from breakpoint they said in their conclusion i said christ supplanted paganism because his gospel was better news and the world view centered on his rule and reign brings rest to the restless human heart. It brings a civilization as well.

And I'm not saying, you know, there have been people who have been secularists, and many of the founders of this country may not have had a real faith in Christ, but they had a faith in Christianity to make a better society. They missed the point, and if we focus in on that way, we will have missed, for a finite gain of a better society, we will have missed the infinite gain of having really known Christ. But the more secular forces and ideologies, they say, in the modern West attempt to replace Christ with a belief in nothing, the more paganism is going to rush back in to fill the vacuum. Okay, we're going

to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about climate, an update on that. Stay with it. Got a problem. What? Who are you? It's the new mug they're selling at thedavidknightshow.com, right? So, basically, a mug is something that holds liquid, right? Because, basically, you can't hold coffee with your hands, right? I'm a scatling, but anyone tries to mug me, I'm be ready for it. You dog-faced pony soldier. They say the mug can help patriots

drink coffee, then save the world. This could be bad for us. Save the world? But we owe the world. These people, they're supporting free speech with every mug they buy. Come on. These people, I tell you, will anyway.

You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we have the Biden administration ordering a Catholic hospital to snuff out sanctuary candles. They have two of them in two different areas and they've been in this hospital. They've been burning constantly since 1960, one of them. And another one has been doing that for 15 years. The problem is that they're taking government money. Problem is that they're in San Francisco, you know, where they don't care about crime, property crime. 568 calls to 9-11 and 400 days from Whole Foods flagship store,

and they just finally shut the thing down. I mean, it was serious stuff. They don't care about any of that. Instead, people in San Francisco and the people in the Biden administration are going to come after this Catholic hospital because they said that these candles that they have, sanctuary candles, are going to be a fire hazard. Well, they haven't been since 1960, you know, for 62 years, and another one for 15 years.

But part of the problem with this is that as we see the Biden administration, just like we were saying the other day about China, they will come after any and every religion because they have to be the only institution. They have to be the paramount institution. They don't want any competition from anything else. So the Chinese will come after the Christians. They'll come after the Muslims. They'll come after the Falun Gong, anybody.

Just like they'll come after their political opponents because they see them fundamentally as political opponents because they want to be God to the people. And then they'll come after the family for the same reason. Because they don't want anyone to have any connection to any institution, including the family. They want the government to be everything. But again, part of this here is that if you take money from the government, there'll be strings attached. You take the money from them, they own you. And so between that and the fact that the Biden administration is anti-religion because they want you to bow down and worship them.

If they do not shut these candles down, they said the system will lose accreditation and all federal funding jeopardizing health care for thousands of low-income disabled elderly citizens. Yet no other inspector in the health care system's history has ever identified the small candle as a safety issue over 62 years. And in this article, they have a picture of it. And it's a very small candle. It's got a metal pedestal. It's got metal around it, metal above it.

Not a fire hazard. So they said in requiring this hospital to extinguish its flame, said the Beckett Fund, who is defending them, they said, you are trying to extinguish not a candle, but the First Amendment rights of the St. Francis Health System. So I said it was in San Francisco. It's St. Francis, and they're in Oklahoma. My mistake.

They require the hospital to hide its faith without a compelling government interest, is what the Beckett defenders are saying. The letter further noted that the candle is securely kept in the chapel, that there are ample sprinklers around to cope with the unlikely possibility of the flame escaping this little tiny candle a fire marshal has already approved the flame and annual inspections and the cms's own guidelines clearly allow for flames for religious purposes primarily prohibit them in proximity to metal medical equipment furthermore the surveyor with the federal government incorrectly called the enclosed candle an open flame. Again, you know, it's got a base.

It's enclosed around the side and it's got a cap above it. It is not an open flame. When challenged, the bureaucrat changed his tune and said that the lighter briefly used to light the candle is an open flame. So if you're going to light the candle with a lighter, you've got an open flame there. So that violates the federal safety standards, which they've never had a problem with for 62 years. So this is nothing other than the arbitrary total power,

and no different than what China is doing with prisoners and transplants. They said there's over a dozen prudently managed flames around the hospital. I said, yeah, you know, we've got flames in the kitchen. We've got pilot lights. You have to light those pilot lights with an open flame as well. We have pilot lights for stoves and ovens in the kitchen. We have gas dryers in the laundry room. Flames in gas water heaters.

We've got welding has been done sometimes for electrical and construction purposes. in the laundry room, flames in gas water heaters. We've got welding has been done sometimes for electrical and construction purposes. Yet the government's permit permits these flames that are used for secular reasons while prohibiting the one little candle and the chapel that is used for religious reasons. Now, what government organization is doing this? This is another reason I wanted to cover this story. It's coming from CMS. CMS, the federal bureaucracy that hands out the money for Medicare and Medicaid. And that's what they're trying to pull.

That's when they said, you know, for poor people, it's going to shut down their health care. Because CMS has the purse strings for Medicare and Medicaid. And it's big business. No hospital can survive with that. And so the Biden administration, when they were rolling out these mandates for the health care industry, used the purse strings of CMS to get these bean counters, running these corporate hospitals to have their people vaccinated. And so now CMS officials have refused to work with St. Francis. They said we could ask that St. Francis

add additional shielding, they said, if they really want to do this. They don't think it's shielded enough. Well, we could put even more there. Could inspect the flame to confirm that it is nowhere near oxygen equipment. They could accept the hospital's proposal to add tile on the wall and on the floor around the candle, you know, as if this was some kind of a big wood furnace or something. You know, you do that in your home. You put tile up on the wall and on the floor. This is a little candle, little tiny candle.

The fact that government will not accept that as a compromise, the fact that government hasn't even entertained such alternatives, shows that it has not and cannot demonstrate that it is using the least restrictive means for furthering its interest in safety. Again, how is this different from what they're doing to us with emissions? How is this different from what Biden and other Democrats and Kathy Hochul in New York are doing to people over gas stoves? You see, this is all about the arbitrary exercise of power. There's no more reason to shut down gas heaters, space heaters, HVAC.

There's no reason to shut that down. There's no more reason to shut down a gas stove or a range than there is to shut down this candle. It's the arbitrary exercise of power. There is absolutely, it's just as absurd, these environmental regulations that they're pushing on people are just as absurd as this story about the candle. There's absolutely no reason for it. The next thing they'll say is that the candle is emitting CO2 and it has to go.

Maybe we'll have all candles will be prohibited. Wait for it. Who knows what kind of crazy things they're going to do with net zero. With net zero, they may prohibit all candles, all lighters. You will be instantly fined if you rub two sticks together. I don't know. The media's constant linking of extreme weather to climate change is intellectually dishonest, says a top U.S. meteorologist.

One of the top Western U.S. broadcast meteorologists hit out recently at clickbait stories that demonized every major weather event. Don Daly, often referred to as Wyoming's weatherman, said politicians, media, and environmental groups have a constant mantra that every national weather event is somehow the result of human activity. He said that is intellectually dishonest. Most climate news stories were heavy in anecdotes and light in any data, said Don Daly, who has syndicated on more than 70 stations. He said climate clickbait stories follow a formula. It includes claims of impending doom, reference to non-atmospheric scientists,

cherry-picked or misleading data, and a suggestion that we all change our ways and do what we say. He said, Reporters will often interview people who offer personal anecdotes and then try to frame their stories as another sign of man-made climate change. Ignored by most media are stories that do not fit the narrative, such as the last tornado season that was one of the least active. And of course, the last hurricane season was one of the

least active that we had. And they had one hurricane, and it wasn't even that strong a hurricane. It was right at the cusp between category four and five. It's been frequently the case that they had multiple category five hurricanes going through, but they only had one hurricane this whole last season. And yet they want to tell us that it was a horrific, horrific season. I saw when I went to the American Meteorological Association, the AMA had their convention in Austin. And again, I've mentioned this before. We went around and saw all the different science projects that these different meteorologists were doing,

how they're trying to predict the weather just a couple of days in advance and how they were all struggling to do it. They all had different models, and they were giving presentations. They had a massive floor that was set up like a science fair where they would talk to you about their particular thing. And some of them had been selected to give presentations. And I sat in on some of those presentations and, um, they were not able to predict the weather a couple of days in advance, a few days in advance,

very accurately. So they were all working to try to do that. So you can imagine that they don't have much confidence in people. We're trying to tell you what the weather is going to be like in decades and so there was one uh there was a booth that was set up by a soros controlled organization and they are mentioned in this story as a matter of fact climate central um if i remember correctly was the one that was at that Austin American Meteorological Association meeting. And it was the one that was there. We looked it up. It was funded by George Soros. And they were there. Their exhibit was to chide all of these meteorologists and saying,

you're not doing enough to push climate change. People don't believe it enough, and they would believe you if you said that. And so they were going directly to these people and saying, you've got to push this narrative, and if you do, people will believe you because you have credibility with them. And so this guy is calling them out. Another meteorologist, Roger Hilke, said last month, climate journalism has evolved from reporting news to being a narrative. And that was about a decade ago, again, when I was traveling as a reporter.

It's just like we see with the Soros-funded LGBT agenda, the transgender agenda, going back to Yogyakarta in Indonesia. They create these narratives, they fund these narratives, and after a while, they start getting adopted. And so now you've got weathermen who are doing that. I know back in Raleigh, there was a very popular weatherman who was there, and he was a skeptic until just recently. And now he says, I repent. I'm going to go that way. They're getting to everybody. And it's not because there's any new data.

As a matter of fact, there's even less reason to believe it now because we've got yet another couple of decades from when he was doing the weather reports. We've got another couple of decades of failed prophecies. Another couple of decades of them hiding their data. So why would you change? Well, it's so that you'll be liked. It's the shame, the guilt, the fear.

The same behavioral psychology they use on COVID that they're using on the transgender thing. They use that on the climate thing as well. And they can shame and put a guilt trip as well as concern about whether or not they're going to be able to keep their job for these meteorologists. But Roger Pilkey says, I'm calling out climate journalism because I'm seeing its pathological effects on public views, especially with young people. Extreme weather is no longer about the weather. This need to feed the climate beast leads to a knock-on effect

of creating incentives for researchers to produce studies with links to man-made climate change, no matter how tenuous, no matter how trivial. He said the switch to demonizing bad weather has occurred because global warming ran out of steam about 25 years ago. The satellite record shows a current pause of nearly nine years in length. State weather services have needed little encouragement to run with the single weather narrative to help promote the collectivist net zero project. Look, it's not a pause.

It's a reversal for them. To say it's a pause is to say, well, we know that it's been warming and it's going to continue to warm. That's not true. So it's not a pause. It's a denial. The data denies what they're doing. You can call me a denier. you can call me a skeptic well i am skeptical but the data is what is denying what you are doing they said climate central is nothing other than agit prop agitation propaganda by many left-wing foundations

such as you know the Soros group. Climate Matters is another one that is there. The complete playbook that made, and this is from David Young, an essay from David Young, the complete playbook that made climate sciences culture deteriorate was also deployed to covid science and epidemiology making meaningful scientific debate virtually impossible see this is another example of this so i call it the mcguffin i saw the same tactics hiding the data manipulating the data uh and um the same endpoint as well which they don't talk about. They're just talking about how the information is presented to people. They're not even talking about the fact that we have the same endpoint

with net zero that we did with COVID zero. We've got to lock you down and take everything away from you. In the U.S., narrative-driven media consists of little more than ideologically driven, partially state-controlled purveyors of carefully screened information. And this is about all these different aspects of it. So 75% of Brits think that the UK will not hit net zero. The question is, do they really care? This is being done by, this is a survey that was being done by YouGov.

Now, as I've said before was being done by YouGov. Now, as I've said before, we see this often in politics, the fact that they will do a study in order to nudge the public in one direction or the other. And that's the purpose of this study. They're pushing fear. They're pushing their agenda. They're saying 75% of Brits think that the UK will not hit the net zero target, but, um, uh, they, they put that in the context and ask them in this push poll, uh, how well is the government doing in handling this issue of climate change? So what they're saying is they're still pushing the fear that climate change is going to destroy

everything and say, is the government doing enough? Do you think we're going to meet the goals? Instead of saying, is this stuff real? See, this is the problem when we don't oppose this at the source. And this is the problem that I have with what RFK Jr. has said about the climate change agenda. He still believes in it. When he says that it's been hijacked by Bill Gates and other people, he thinks that it is a legitimate concern. It's not a legitimate concern. And if you believe that it is a legitimate concern, you're going to go back to this same agenda.

It's going to take you right back to the same place. As a matter of fact, going back, and I don't know if this is the second interview that he did with Kim Iverson. It's what Gerald Slinty referred to yesterday. He said, climate issues and pollution issues are being exploited by mega billionaires like Bill Gates. He said, the same way that COVID was exploited to use it as an excuse to clamp down, top down totalitarian controls on society, and to give us then engineering solutions. Again, he's saying it's a MacGuffin.

And I agree with him. It absolutely is. So I just saw this note that you put up there. You said the hospital was granted a waiver for the eternal flame. Did they really do that? They really did that. The article's behind a paywall, so I can't read more. Oh, okay. They were granted a waiver.

Okay. Granted a waiver for the eternal flame. I guess we could do that for the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. What do they have? I don't know if they've got an eternal flame there. They do for JFK. So I guess maybe, how about that? The Kennedy family will not have their eternal flame shut down.

They will still be able to have their open gas flame there. It is an open flame being fueled by gas. But we will allow that to continue, even though the kennedy clan believes that we have climate change yeah okay and a comment and a tip thank you jason i appreciate that jason barker from nights of the storm their program is tomorrow at 10 a.m uh i was on that program last week i should uh retweet that I don't know if I retweet that. And I'm on Twitter so little now, I just noticed that Eric Peters, uh, put up a

notice on Twitter said, I think I'm going to just leave this whole thing. I'm spending too much time here. I was better for me to spend time writing articles on my site. If you want to see where it is that Eric Peters, I feel the same way. You know, I, I, uh, it takes me enough time to do this show. I don't want to hang out on social media. If I'm going to have supposedly, you know, 134,000 people following me and two people retweet it. It's like, okay, what is this about? Uh, anyway, um, Jason, appreciate that on rock fan. Thank you for the tip. He says,

I don't always drink coffee, but when I do drink out of a DK, save the mug, save the world mug. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that. Um, yeah, we're trying to save the world from the people who are trying to save the world. That's what people are going to save the world from climate. The people are going to save the world from flu bugs. We're going to save you from those people.

There's net zero people. He said, RFK Jr., if you look closely, it turns out the guys who are promoting those engineering solutions are the people who own the patents for those solutions. Yeah. It's a way that they've given climate chaos a bad name because people now see that it's just another crisis

that's being used to strip mine the wealth of the poor and to enrich billionaires now think about that this is not rfkj pushing back against climate chaos no he says you're giving climate chaos a bad name it's the same thing that i ripped ran paul for when he said to fauci you know dr fau, you're going to make people vaccine hesitant when you're pushing this garbage COVID thing. And I was like, let's hope so. Let's please hope that this blows back on them. RFK Jr. saying, you know, people aren't going to believe this climate lie if you keep using it for profit.

We got to use it for government power. We got to use it for the public good. He may be a true believer. He may be sincere in this stuff. I don't know. He's not capable of doing it, but I know that he's pushing a lie. And he seems to be a true believer in the lie. That might be even more dangerous than somebody who's cynically trying to use it to make money.

But the net result is going to be net zero, regardless of who pushes this. You know, RFKJ, instead of being a savior, could be the person who is the Pied Piper who leads us into voluntary slavery. He said, I, for 40 years, have had the same policy on climate and engineering. So does that mean that he still wants to jail people that he calls deniers? If he's had the same policy for 40 years? I haven't seen him walk that back. He said, you can go back and check my speeches from the 1980s, and I've said the most important solution

for environmental issues is not top-down controls. It's free market capitalism. You know, he actually used the term fair market capitalism in his opening speech, and I said, that's a different thing than free market capitalism, because that says that the government is going to decide what is fair. That's not free. That's like saying the government's going to decide what speech is true, what speech is hateful, and so forth.

To say the government's going to decide what speech is true, what speech is hateful, and so forth. To say the government's going to decide what is fair. He wrote that he supports the First Amendment, but yet he knowingly, he said, I support the First Amendment, which makes room for any citizen to even knowingly spew far more vile lies without legal consequences, he said. But then he added at the time, this is back in 2014, Mark Moreno recorded him at one of these climate confabs where everybody gets on their private jets and flies to talk to each other

about how we got to stop everybody else from flying. He says, so I understand the First Amendment makes it okay for you to even knowingly lie to people. However, I do believe that corporations which deliberately, purposefully, maliciously, and systematically sponsor climate lies should be given the death penalty. Okay. So is Kennedy now saying, RFKJ, is he now saying that Bill Gates should get the death penalty? Or is the death penalty only for the Koch brothers?

I need to know. I need to know if he's changed his position on jailing people that he disagrees with, or giving the death penalty to certain corporations, but maybe not to others. Maybe not to Bill Gates, right? Maybe just to the Koch brothers. So Kennedy suggested that other than Gates, the World Economic Forum is also exploiting climate related policies to produce a totalitarian society. You know, if he does want to have a death penalty for bill gates and klaus schwab i might

have to rethink my support let me get extenuating circumstances you know i normally wouldn't vote for this guy but if he wants to line up klaus schwab and bill gates against the wall i don't know i have to consider it i i don't know uh but again is he going to be consistent about this stuff? Lock up people who say false things. Isn't that the definition of a totalitarian society? It is the very definition of a totalitarian society. That's why I played, you know, Alexander Solzhenitsyn's Live Not By Lies, because in a totalitarian society, they demand that you repeat their lies, that you live by their lies.

And so, yes, Gates and the World Economic Forum, one of the totalitarian society, and one of the ways that they get there is by saying we're going to jail or kill anybody that disagrees with us. How is RFKJ different than that? I need to know. I need to know what is his policy about net zero.

That's what he needs to be asked about. Forget all this stuff about subsidies. You notice that he doesn't talk about salindra. He doesn't talk about all the green subsidies. He doesn't talk about the subsidies to Elon Musk. I mean, subsidies are everywhere, but there's nowhere that you're going to find any more subsidies than you will with the green agenda. He's right about the subsidies to oil businesses. Fine. Stop the subsidies to the oil business. Stop all subsidies. Let's just do it that way. All subsidies, including the green stuff. And you know, if you stop all subsidies across the board and government, guess what's going to go away the first? The green stuff will go away

the first. They absolutely cannot exist without subsidies for electric cars, subsidies for batteries, subsidies for their factories, subsidies, subsidies, subsidies. Elon Musk is the king of crony capitalism and of government subsidies. And he became the world's richest man because of green subsidies, not oil, not oil. So Kennedy goes on to say, what we have in this country now is not free market capitalism. It's crony, corporate crony capitalism. It's a cushy kind of socialism for the rich, a brutal, barbaric, merciless capitalism for the poor. That's absolutely true. But let's see him renounce net zero.

Let's see him renounce the totalitarian control of speech. You see, I like a lot of the things that DeSantis says. I like a lot of the things that RFKantis says. I like a lot of the things that RFKJ says. I hope they get into debates. I don't believe that the solutions are in Washington, first of all. I don't believe the solutions are in the Oval Office, in the White House, and who is president. But let's see these guys who will talk about, uh, and are right about many issues. Let's see them truly support free speech because that's a big problem that I've got with DeSantis as well.

Or if stop and think about the fact that you've got a couple of guys who are out there tackling CBDC who have done more than far more than their competitors to stop what Trump and Biden were doing to us with the vaccines and the lockdowns and the mandates about this and that. They've done far more than anybody else to resist that. However, both of them have some very troubling blind spots, if you will, to be charitable about free speech. You know what DeSantis has done with the, and I'm not talking about banning pornographic books for kids.

That is not free speech. What I'm talking about is turning it into a hate crime, you know, these racist trolls in Florida and going to a foreign country to sign that law. What is that about? I really don't understand that but and i can't excuse that any more than i can excuse what um uh what rfkj has talked about doing with the um um with the um censorship of people who are, you know, traditional energy businesses.

I prefer to call them instead of fossil fuels. And then take a look at the, it's not just Biden's crimes killing people, although that is the issue. You've now got more efforts to try to get to the bottom of this Hunter Biden stuff. Uh, Comer and Grassley are doing, uh, another round of trying to get documents about this.

I don't think anything is ever going to happen about that. We knew about that, uh, before the, um, um, you know, before we had the,

um, election in 2020, uh, that was already out there. Everybody knew it. And you had this massive propaganda campaign to shut it down. Okay, we'll take a quick break and we'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Okay, welcome back. Dan Andrews is sent to me by a listener in Australia.

Dan Andrews is now defending drag story time. He says that the people who are demonstrating against it are haters and that they are violent because, you know, speech is violence. This is how we get there by labeling things a hate speech. And the next thing you know, speech is violence. That's what Dan Andrews is doing. The guy that we called Dictator Dan, and he was pushing the jabs. Now he is defending the drags. And there's an interesting overlap. As I pointed out, when I talked about Yogyakarta in Indonesia back in 2006, as they're celebrating this, you have this green organization in Germany focusing

in detail on what happened in that seminal conference where they laid out all the legal structures and guidelines that are now being imposed de facto in society, whether it's being pushed by the entertainment industry, by Disney or whoever it is. But they laid out that agenda for transgenderism and they linked transgenderism to the successes that they'd already had in terms of sexual preferences. And so they linked those two together for legal purposes. But I thought it was very interesting that an organization that is all about the green agenda would spend so much time talking about transgenderism. It's interesting that you see the control structures for the vaccines, as well as the censorship and the LGBT and the greens, and all of them are tied together over and again. It's not just that this is the type of personality that's going to buy into that.

This is a green organization focusing on the transgender agenda. I thought that was interesting. But going back to Australia, Dan Andrews, dictator Dan, slams protesters for hate speech after the cancellation of a drag storytime event. You see, this is why this matters. You know, DeSantis has done more and done it earlier than anybody else. I criticize him because I don't think he's done enough. But he's done more and done it earlier than anybody else

to fight this grooming of kids in the schools. And yet, if you're going to push through hate speech penalties to people, you know that they're going to define hate speech penalties to people, uh, you know, that they're going to define hate speech. However they want, it's going to be any speech that they hate. And so they're going to turn this back around on parents and, um,

and attack them just as we see happening in Australia. Uh, it matters the way that you define these terms, Victorian premier, Dan Andrews, dictator, Dan blasted protesters who derailed a local council meeting and Glenn Waverly last week, accusing them of spreading hate speech to force the cancellation of drag queen

reading event. This is the same guy that would not have allowed anybody to meet, uh, because of his lockdown rules. It would demanded that you have a mask, that if you get out at the beginning of this thing, you would be arrested by Dictator Dan. They wanted to be able to track everybody's movements.

You're going to have to scan QR codes every time you entered a place and report back to them. On Thursday afternoon, the city there announced its controversial drag storytime event had been scrapped, citing advice from the Victoria Police that it should not proceed. Now they go to the violence charge. How can you have violence at an event that never happened? No, the speech is the violence, they say.

Counselors and staff have received messages that nobody should be expected to receive in their workplace. Oh, what was that about? Was it like the books that no child should be shown in a school or a library? Graphic sexual how-to books? No, no, no. It wasn't like that. No, what they did was they sent emails to them, and they were emails that said things like, you are a groomer.

You are a pedophile. Well, hey, if the shoe fits, wear it, right? Why, if that is a bad thing to these counselors, to groom kids, to be a pedophile, that is very descriptive of what they're actually doing. And so why are they ashamed of it? When are they going to come out of the closet as groomers and pedophiles? Now, that was the vile language, they said,

and the rhetoric that was being used was offensive, and it was quite intimidating. It went right up to violence. As a matter of fact, it is violence, I think. Yeah, that's what it is. It's violence. The anti- of fact, it is violence, I think. Yeah, that's what it is. It's violence. The anti-drag group started to shout abuse, saying things like that. You're a groomer.

You're a pedophile. Imagine that. So they're afraid because this could be violence. As a matter of fact, it already is. No, they're just telling people what you're doing. Ugly scenes, ugly scenes on any measure, including death threats against council officers and counselors. It is a disgrace. A disgrace.

It is shameful. Are there death threats? Let's see it. If there were death threats, they would have arrested these people. They wouldn't have just shut down the event. I don't think that there were death threats. There was no violence. There was no threat of violence.

They just don't like being called what they're shamed of what they are. They are groomers. They are pedophiles. They're going to sexualize these kids. This isn't saying that you can't have your drag show saying you can't have your drag show and the kids there. And then in this article from Australia, they say the American state,

Florida has become a central battleground for cultural wars. The state's governor, DeSantis, is conducting a self-described war on woke, which has included measures to outlaw the discussion of gender, identity, and sexuality in schools. And they then quote Dan Andrews,

dictator Dan. He says, I again make the point, this is not about free speech. This is hate speech, plain and simple. You see? Same thing that RFKJ said. RFKJ said, I believe in the First Amendment. You can knowingly tell people lies.

Except these people are telling people lies about the climate thing, and they need to be arrested, jailed, and in some cases killed. Dan Andrews says, this is not about free speech. I like free speech, but this is speech I hate. And so the speech that I hate, did we just lose it? It froze up? Okay. The speech that I hate has to go.

He says, equality is non-negotiable. But the problem is, is that on animal farm, some animals are more equal than others, aren't they? Some animals can say and do as they please. Other animals cannot have that same luxury. So whether you're talking about Dictator Dan, or you're talking about Dictator DeSantis, because, look, if you start banning speech that truly is hateful, we know how this looked with the RICO statutes, right? They couldn't get convictions against the mafia, so they said, all right,

if we first declare, because they had a lot of money, they could hire the best lawyers and they could play all the legal games forever, and they could evade. For the same reason you're not going to win a lawsuit against Google. They couldn't get criminal convictions against organized crime. So they said, well, first we'll declare them as racketeering and influence corrupt organizations, and then we will preemptively take away their means of defense. We'll take all their money from them so they won't be able to defend themselves.

And it wasn't long before they used the RICO statutes on pro-life protesters. And so, you know, it is a very well-known pattern that if you set up a bad law, it's going to be applied to a lot of different people. I just want to pass this along. This was sent to me. We're looking at letters here. This was sent from the John Birch society, jbs.org. A reminder to, uh, let legislators know if you are in Tennessee,

to let legislators know that you need to end federal education funding in Tennessee, and that there is a bill now in Tennessee to phase this out over a period of 10 years, because federal funds account for 40% of educational funding here in Tennessee. And, um, if you don't want the strings attached to it, then this is a good way to do it. And if you don't live in Tennessee, uh, you need to tell this to your state representatives to not take the government money, that's how they put

the boys and the girls bathrooms and everything else is how they push the CRT stuff and everything else. You'll have no freedom of education as long as you get free money. They'll use it to control you. As JBS.org said, the future of America is homeschools that are totally free of federal grants or money. Charlotte Isserby warned that homeschools must not take any federal funds, quote, not even a penny.

Rockfin, Harps, thank you so much in Australia. You are so much nicer in your description of him, David. Dictator Dan. Yeah, he is a thoroughly reprehensible person. Unfortunately, you know, I'm sorry, Harps, that I had to see some of the awful people that you've got ruling you down. Like Gladys Berejiklian, who's now passed on. Not literally, but passed on in politics, I guess, for a while. She's biding her time, probably find a way back in.

But yeah, Dictator Dan and Busybody Gladys. It's amazing what you guys went through down there. Because everybody was experiencing it in one way or the other. This was sent to me by Handy. Handy, who has been a great source of information for these last three years. He's got a sub stack now, but he passed this on. He said, look at this article from Vox.

They're wringing their hands over chicken embryos, feeling pain in the egg. They're worried about egg abortions. Literally worried about egg abortions, but they don't care about human abortions. And so the title of this article from Vox is Save the Male Chicks. Would they ever say that about humans? They want to get rid of males as well but this is about chicken sexing karen used to work as a personnel manager when we first moved to north carolina

or maybe shortly after that i forget what the order of the job she had but she she worked uh as a personnel director for a farm cooperative and and they had a large chicken processing thing. And she went there because they were having some problems with the chicken sexers. I said, the what? The chicken sexers. And so as these chicks are born, these women are very, typically women, and it's a very repetitive job, but they would spread the wings and they'd look at the wings and they could identify male or female if there's a male they'd throw them in a basket you know if it's female they'd go down the conveyor belt to the next collection point you know they're going to use them

as egg production but they would throw the the males into the basket and they were showing her how to sex chickens uh there but they said every hour across the world about 742 000 freshly hashed hatched male chicks are born a few hours later they're tossed into a grinder no we don't like that so we got to do something about so maybe what we can do is instead of waiting for them to be born and taking a look at their wings and then killing them. Another option would be to use technology to identify the sex of the chick while still in the egg. When this was done in China, they called it gendercide, right? Get rid of the girls. Now they want to get rid of the boys before they hatch.

Since 2019, five companies have managed to commercialize in-egg sexing technology. But there's a catch. They said scientists believe that the embryos could potentially feel pain as early as day seven of their 21 day incubation period. You understand this is the basis for these anti-abortion laws that we have. Part of it was the earlier ones were about feeling pain, but it is about saving life and preserving life, of it was, uh, the earlier ones were about feeling pain, but it is about saving life and preserving life, keeping it, uh, sacred, sanctified the sanctity of life from

the very beginning. Because if you don't do it at the very beginning of life, you won't do it at the end of life or in the middle of life, or when you have, uh, any kind of an issue, but now they're worried about the chickens feeling pain if they are aborted. So as early as day seven of their 21-day incubation period, a new pre-print study funded by the German government, conducted by researchers in Munich, provides some evidence that the chicken embryos may not be capable of feeling pain

until much later, maybe after day 12. Researchers applied potentially painful stimuli like heat and electricity to chicken embryos from day 7 to day 19 of their 21-day incubation, measuring their heart rate, their blood pressure, their brain activity, their movement, all in an effort to uncover whether the stimuli translated to experienced pain. Did they ever do that for humans? No. As a matter of fact, you know, that horrific, but it should be seen.

I mean, it's a horrific thing to watch, but the animated thing called The Procedure that was narrated by Kevin Sorbo, and it's based on the testimony of a ultrasound technician, I guess, or a doctor, I don't know. But anyway, he was called to assist with the procedure. He didn't know it was going to be an abortion. And to his horror, he watched the whole thing unfold, and they animate it for you.

And you see this baby, this female girl, recoiling as they're ripping her apart limb by limb. Do they care about the pain? No. No. Not for humans, they don about the pain? No. No. Not for humans, they don't. It's amazing. It's amazing.

Again, when I talk about all these politicians, the GOP, you look at what Trump is doing, what Tim Scott, who wants to run, he's from South Carolina, he wants to run for president. You look at Lindsey Graham, you know, both of the senators from South Carolina said, well, we got to federalize this and we're going to move it up to 16 weeks instead of six weeks or something like that. Trump wants to do the same thing. Do they care about the sanctity of life? Do they care about pain? No, they don't.

They care about being popular. And these people are writing this long article. Thanks for sending this, Handy. It's absolutely amazing. The German ministry is doing this, and these companies are doing that, and France has put in a ban on chick culling. Can't abort the babies.

They have, France has an abortion ban on chicks, developing chicks, but they're proud to do that to humans. Italy's ban goes into effect in 2026 but it doesn't yet stipulate a threshold for culling. How many days are you going to go into this? The European Commission is expected to eventually ban the practice continent-wide and yet the European Commission will continue to push abortion.

Does this seem strange to you? They can have so much compassion for chickens and of course everybody got really upset and rightfully so when Fauci was doing these horrific experiments on puppies yeah I understand as well but where's the compassion for our own children our hearts have been so hardened against them that we don't care

because Fauci murder for hire, aborting them to obtain their organs and then using it for his Frankenstein transhumanist mice experiments to test his horrific drugs. What does it matter with this boy? Well, we won't think about it for a couple more days. Thank you for joining us. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.

You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now. Yeah. Good job. And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere

to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com. That's a website.