The David Knight Show - 5Sep23 Proud Boys Given Extreme Sentences as DOJ Engages in Terrorism
Episode Date: September 5, 2023OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESExtreme sentences given to Joe Biggs, Proud Boys (and other J6ers) — enhanced political terrorism from the DOJ. Nothing he did comes close to warranting 17 year...s for Joe. Unfortunately, he and others, still place their hope in Trump who showed THEN and NOW that he couldn't care less about their fate. (2:34)Fauci's mask comes OFF - still lying through his teeth. Even CNN & New York Times point out the emperor wannabe is a naked tyrant. Fauci changes the terms of the debate and all the globalist pandemic tyrants around the globe say they didn't "mandate" anything as Trump, the self-proclaimed "father of the vaccine" who campaigned on how well he took orders from Fauci, re-invents himself as the "don not comply" resistance! When FOX news told Trump Goldman Sachs wanted masks, Trump became very receptive (23:31))mRNA Wars: Pfizer & Moderna Fight the GoldWas it the plan to have Moderna (Moncef Slaoui) take the lead? Did Pfizer jump in and take it away? What of Robert Malone's work in the 1990s? There are BILLIONS of FUTURE loot from mRNA "treatments" in the pipeline (1:21:21)FDA gets setback in lawsuit against it by 3 doctors, essentially for the bureaucracy practicing medicine without a license in telling people NOT to use Ivermectin (1:36:53)For only the 2nd time in history (1st time was 250 YEARS AGO), something has happened to US Treasury auction. And, the son of Cuban refugee, now a high profile investment analyst, recounts how his father came to USA with only $200 — but invested in gold (when he was outside the USA where it was prohibited to purchase) (1:56:05)Porn: Rogan Says He Can Handle It. Can Andrew Tate's Women Handle It?Rogan tells Oliver Anthony that booze, drugs, porn are bad for "some" people, but he can handle it. Satan tells everyone that. And encrypted text messages from Andrew Tate's "Pimpin Hoes Degree (PhD)" show the same grooming tactics used on kids in government schools (2:07:44) "Poor Things": Lurid Left's Pedo-Sex Fantasies No wonder film critics gave it 100% rating. "Poor Things" has everything the left loves — suicide, abortion, baby parts repurposed, sex with mentally impaired child-like person, explicit porn, and and feminist gender wars (2:28:22) Schools use THE SAME GROOMING TECHNIQUE as Andrew Tate, especially against mentally impaired kids (as Emma Stone's "Poor Things" movie celebrates) (2:35:51)CNN portrays 2 homosexual rapists as victims — one raped a 12 yr old boy, another raped a mentally disabled man. CNN says they're victims of harsh Ugandan laws (2:41:11)Christian pastor, twice arrested in front of his young children and sent to jail for weeks for holding church services, WINS in court. But government backed away without backing down on their unlawful "orders" (2:45:21)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Every dollar counts to keep up with the bills or to help with the cost of raising a family.
A little bit extra can make a difference.
You might be eligible for benefits and credits, like the Canada Workers' Benefit,
the Canada Child Benefit, the Disability Tax Credit, and the GST-HST Credit.
You may also be able to get your taxes done for free.
Find out if you qualify.
Visit Canada.ca slash EveryDollarCounts for more information.
A message from the Government of Canada.
Have you received a red light or speed camera violation in the mail?
Vehicle owners can pay or dispute online.
Learn more at Toronto.ca slash APS. Using free speech to free minds.
You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 5th of September,
in the year of our Lord, 2023.
It's been good to be off a little bit,
but we're going to be back today with a lot of important news.
DARPA has come out of the box.
Special forces at war with us on social media.
We're going to talk about Joe Biggs and the January 6th sentencings that are happening,
and especially what is going on with Fauci and the reinvention of Donald Trump as a do-not-comply
guy. But we're also going to take a look at what is happening in Hollywood as a new Emma Stone film shows us
their real pedophile fantasies. We'll be right back. so well let me just say that um i appreciate the time off and thank you so much to tony artaban
and all of his great guests on friday uh guard included and um uh and then yesterday we had some
rebroadcasts.
But I did not comment really on this much at all.
I can't remember if I got on social media much this weekend.
I think I did something yesterday.
But for the most part, I just need to get away from the media for a while.
But I did see on Thursday, as the show was ending, the sentence to Joe Biggs.
And I want to start with that today.
Truly outrageous.
And 17 years in prison, he's already been in jail for a couple of years,
tortured while there, as the other January 6 prisoners are as well.
They gave an enhancement of terrorism, saying that he had pushed over a fence.
And they call that terrorism.
Let me tell you what terrorism is.
Giving somebody a 17 year sentence for showing up to protest an election,
giving people years in prison for walking into their precious space when the doors were open and the police guard said, come on in. Yeah.
The restroom's right over there. Sure. You want to use, right?
That's right over there. And they got people in their seventies. Now look at five, 10 years in prison Yeah, the restroom's right over there. Sure, you want to use the restroom? That's right over there. And they've got people in their 70s now, looking at 5-10 years in prison for that.
That's terrorism. Terrorism of that sort
is intimidating, coercing,
punishing people, and of course, you know, terrorizing
them in prison as well, torturing them.
That is political terrorism.
Doing that for their political goals.
That's what this is about.
Everybody is so focused on Trump, and Trump could not care less about these people.
I noticed on Friday that he had gone on a 3 a.m. rant about how he, how Trump, was being persecuted by. He
doesn't even care about these people getting decades in prison, elderly people getting life
sentences for walking into the Capitol building when he was pushing and provoking them, bringing
them in. He doesn't care about anybody but himself. He didn't care about Julian Assange.
He didn't care about any of the January Sixers either.
He had two weeks to pardon them, but it was all about him.
If he had pardoned them, that might have given him some risk in his mind.
He wasn't going to do anything about it.
Now, Julie Kelly, who was covering the sentencing hearings and the trials
she said obviously I have a lot to report on what just happened in the Proud Boys sentencing
but I'm still in shock after hearing an assistant U.S. attorney
straining to compare shaking part of a metal fence
to a mass causality event a casualtyty event, I think she means to say,
to justify terrorism enhancement.
And then she has a clip of the offense shaking.
And immediately you have people jump on.
I looked at the comments as the sentences were talked about on conservative media.
And I saw the leftists say, oh, that's good you know just string them up we
don't care what happens the conservative media was all about but ray epps ray epps ray epps
really yeah i didn't saw ray epps tore the fence down where and he no i look at that picture
and you see people up there at the fence,
and the guy that was up there shaking the fence comes back,
and Ray Epps shakes his head no and whispers something into his ear.
And the guy goes back and pushes the fence and part of that.
The guy initially said Ray Epps did not, told him, don't do that.
Then he said that under oath.
Then later he said, no, he told me to take defense.
When he was talking to conservative radio, Trump radio.
But that's not under oath.
So the question is, and they're still sentencing people.
They just sentenced a, not sentencing, charging people.
They just charged a guy who's 22 years old for walking into their precious building.
I wouldn't bother to even go to the Capitol building.
That's what I think of this occupying government here.
I'm not even curious as to what this whole charade looks like on their daily business.
But 22-year-old, he was charged now.
Here we are, two and a half years later.
He was charged and committed suicide.
They're still charging people with this stuff.
So don't play that game, right?
It wasn't Ray Epps who made millions of dollars by sending people there.
It was Trump and Alex and people like that.
They're Stop the Steal.
They're Save America Grift.
They were the ones who got people there on January 6th.
I was telling people from when I was at InfoWars, don't listen to Alex.
It's a grift.
I warned people up to the very day of it, and I wish I could have spoken to Biggs,
but I don't think he would have listened.
I know exactly that he would not have listened.
And he still doesn't understand what's going on.
He called in on Saturday to talk to Alex from prison,
and he thinks that if Trump gets elected, that's his only chance,
is Trump getting elected.
When he was at the sentencing hearing, obviously distraught and said, I don't
care about left and right anymore. I don't want to be a member of the Proud Boys anymore. I just
want to be a member of the PTA and have a life with my daughter. But then he goes on with Alex
and is back to the usual stuff. I don't get it, frankly.
If Trump was going to pardon him, why don't you think he would have done it to start with?
He didn't care about any of these people.
He still doesn't care about any of them.
He wouldn't pardon Julian Assange.
He was pardoning Jared Kushner's criminal friends, the biggest white-collar criminals in history.
And Trump was pardoning them.
Check the money flow on that.
Forget about his hookers.
Look at the money flow from the pardons through Jared Kushner.
Look at the money flow to Jared Kushner from the Saudis and so on.
That's the big bucks.
They don't want to look at that.
But he was focused on pardoning these criminals.
Didn't care about Julian Assange, who helped him get into office by telling the truth about Hillary Clinton.
All you have to do is tell the truth about these people.
But evidently, the truth about Trump is not good enough.
They've got to fabricate some lies to come after him because the truth points to them as well.
They're guilty of the same crimes.
They ought to go to jail for the same crimes that Trump should go to jail for.
So they invent some new stuff on the side.
And that helps to fan the flames of civil war.
So one person whose tweet is pulled out here by Information Liberation says,
without a press cheering it on and a silent GOP establishment, this couldn't happen in America.
GOP establishment? Is Trump now part of the GOP establishment?
Trump doesn't have anything to say about this.
He doesn't care about this stuff again
3am rant about himself
he doesn't care about Joe Biggs
he doesn't care about Proud Boys
he doesn't care about anybody that was caught up in this January the 6th
grift
come to Washington January the 6th
for what?
what was the purpose of that?
what did they think they were going to change?
there was absolutely nothing that could have been done.
It was completely a setup.
And now they pretend, oh, well, you know, this is rigged from the very beginning.
Zachary Rail, given 15 years in prison as well on Thursday,
and since then another one has been sentenced to 18 years. Dear Canadian exporters, what you do matters more than ever. And in the face of uncertain times, Export Development Canada has your back.
Whether you're navigating currency fluctuations, need additional working capital,
or are mitigating supply chain risks, we can help you overcome the challenges.
It's what we've been doing since 1944.
Because the world needs more Canada.
Together, let's give it to them.
Visit edc.ca slash export for more.
Joe begs two Purple Hearts serving in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
And Joe has just, he's been so used by this government his entire life.
He's idealistic he trusted the government's narrative initially eventually came around to figure out the truth about the iraq war
about 9-11 and the rest of this stuff he's trying to do the right thing trying to do the right thing just amazing um more than a lot of murderers get 17 years and um again when it's reported
zero hedge says which reminds us that instigator ray epps who's totally not a fed remains free to
this day again if that's sure you know somebody not being indicted did ray epps make millions of dollars on
this tens of millions hundreds of millions like trump did tens of millions like alex hundreds of
millions like uh like trump if that's your yardstick there then why aren't those guys being
called feds they're using ray epps and other people like him to cover up what they did
to people and get
them on the phone and say, yeah, I'm on your side.
If not
being charged means
that you are a fed,
you know, if saying
people, let's go, let's go over there.
If that means that
you're a fed, then are they feds?
Was Trump in on all this stuff?
Was Alex?
I mean, seriously, why aren't they charged with this stuff?
Norm Pattis, the defendants are not terrorists.
He's the lawyer for, at one time, Joe Biggs.
I don't know if he was Joe Biggs' lawyer at this point in time.
He said, whatever excesses of zeal they demonstrated on January the 6th,
no matter how grave the potential interference with the orderly transfer of power,
a decade or more behind bars is excessive punishment.
He is absolutely right.
And, of course, Norm Pattis points the finger at trump as well
uh look in terms of pardons you're not going to get a pardon from pence if he were to win but he
don't have a chance uh you're not going to get a pardon from nikki haley she doesn't have a chance
either uh but i'm not so sure about trump since he didn't do the right thing the first time around you know you've got other people like desantis and ramaswami said
yeah i would pardon them uh but with trump there i don't think trump's going to win a general
election and uh you know he's likely to be the nominee uh big saying, he's done with the left and right.
He doesn't want to be a member of the Proud Boys.
He just wants to do the PTA.
And when he went on,
he said,
asked viewers to donate to help his family.
He said his military pension has been revoked.
Two Purple Hearts, they revoked his pension because he pushed on a that's that type of thing look as
I said before somebody breaks and enters if somebody gets violent with a cop thought I'd
be punishment but these punishments are excessive like I said before more than people see for murder.
And they're being tortured while they're there as well.
Again, he says, I hope Trump wins because I know he'll pardon me.
I believe that with all my heart.
Joe, you got to wake up.
This country of people got to wake up.
And then Alex says, they set us all up on January.
Alex was set up.
Alex didn't know.
Who picked the date, Alex?
January the 6th.
Did you pick it?
Did Trump pick it?
Some people coordinating between you guys pick it?
Where did that date come up with?
How were you, why were you collecting money?
What were you going to do to fix the election?
Trump collected money saying he's going to pay the lawyers, but he kept all the money himself
and he didn't pay the lawyers anything. The first $8,000
he got from anybody, he kept.
Split it with the RNC.
The GOP establishment.
So what were you going to do
with the money, Alex?
What were you going to do with the January 6th crowd to stop
this and to fix it, right?
They ran the election according to the rules that Trump put in place that are still in place,
even without a lockdown, still have the mail-out ballot stuff, vote-by-mail stuff.
That's Trump's legacy of corruption in the elections.
The elections were held by his rules, and he cries foul,
and that's why I cried about Trump right after the election.
You're selling people this false hope.
Steve Pachinik on Infowars two days afterwards saying,
we know exactly what's going on.
Trump put out blockchain watermark ballots.
They got quantum computing, calculating all this stuff.
We got 20,000 National Guard out there arresting people right now.
Oh, great.
Millions of views.
Rush Limbaugh talking about it.
He had Clarence Thomas' wife texting Mark Meadows.
I hope this is true.
It couldn't possibly be true.
It was so patently absurd.
Yeah, he says, John says, you were all patsies that day, Joe.
That's right.
He was your patsy, Alex.
A lot of people.
A lot of people were your patsies.
A lot of people were Trump's patsies.
A lot of media, they were patsies of the right wing media that pushed all this election garbage.
Again, how many times have they been given opportunities to make their case and they don't do it?
And I use the same yardstick on these Trump people about their election stuff that I use against Michael Mann,
who tried to cover up all the data about his hockey stick stuff.
You don't want to talk about the data?
You don't want to show the data?
Then you're lying.
It's just that simple.
Is there corruption in the elections?
Every single one of them.
Did it get worse in 2020?
Yes, because of Trump's new rules, it got worse.
Trump hasn't said whether he'll consider pardons for the Proud Boys specifically.
He said he'd consider pardonardons for the Proud Boys specifically.
He said he'd consider pardoning a large portion of them.
What does that mean?
Did he consider it when he didn't do it?
When he was still president for two weeks?
Perhaps.
So, Terrio gets sentenced today.
Nordean got 18 years, as I pointed out.
So 15 years, 17 years, 18 years, these guys have gotten so far. The 22 year old person, uh, Meacham died August 28th, two weeks after the Biden regime charged him with four misdemeanor crimes for walking inside the open doors.
And, uh, so now the gateway pundit thinks it's possibly suicide,
but we don't know.
But the key thing that we do know
is that the government, two and a half years later,
is still charging more and more and more people.
We do know that Bank of America
supposedly voluntarily turned over information
from everybody who had a financial transaction
through them anywhere around the capital even going into maryland and virginia on that day
and more information about people who had who were there and who had also bought guns using
their credit card the bank of amer America has gone full Stasi.
The Bank of Stasi America.
Rock fan, Mary Ellen Moore, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that.
We're going to take a quick break here.
I'm going to try to calm down, and we'll be right back. The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. on rock fan uh audi mrr modern retro radio uh thank you very much for the tip he says
good morning all can't stay in the chat this morning. Work stuff. Almighty's blessings to his true followers.
Well, thank you.
Appreciate that.
And we do have a lot to talk about today from that standpoint.
I mean, this new movie that's come out with Emma Stone in it.
What a piece of perverted filth it is.
And we're going to talk about that.
And there's some revelations about Andrew Tate.
And then you have Oliver Anthony went on with Joe Rogan.
And they talked porn and alcohol and SSRI drugs to our program.
So I haven't gotten the transcript of it.
I don't know if I can find where the transcript of it.
I don't know if he posts his stuff up after the fact.
The entire thing are just clips from it.
I've just seen some clips, and I've got a couple,
one I want to play for you.
So we're going to talk about that as well as this pastor in Canada,
Stevenson, who was arrested, his family there in front of his family,
little children pleading for him.
You know, God works in mysterious ways, doesn't he?
His church has exploded in terms of size
because people see somebody with integrity and conviction and they're hungry for that
really hungry for that and he's having some legal battles not exactly the one that he wanted. We'll talk about
he won on a technicality because the government wants
to keep the principle where they can shut people down
and where they can overrule Canada's Charter of Rights
for expedience.
Well, if you do that, you don't have a charter, do you?
Yeah, if you can say, well, this is not expedient for us, so we're just going to wipe this away.
So we're going to talk about that as well as DARPA and the special forces at war with
people. They're now teaming up to use artificial intelligence
to listen to gamer conversations in real time
and determine, and it's beyond using AI.
This is beyond just looking for keywords.
It's determining what your motivations are.
This is what the future is going to look like.
And if they are rolling this out as a test case on these game platforms,
it won't be long before they do it on podcasts.
I'm not hiding anything.
I'm not trying to use any euphemisms.
People would stay on YouTube by saying they talk about the vaccine and say,
you know, the thing, the thing, you know, the thing.
I don't play those games.
I call it what it is poison i call it democide death by government so uh but um let's talk first about the masks
a lot of talk about this and on friday i got a email from handy who now has his sub stack as well
he says sorry to send this to you on your day off,
but I need to document in real time.
In the past, I've been careful to redact identifying information.
This time I can call the tyrants out by name.
This is fact, not opinion, he writes.
I'm currently at one of the Emory hospitals here in Atlanta.
I was just told by one of the hospital registration employees
that there is now a patient and employee mask mandate in the ER and some other unspecified areas of the hospital.
The last time they did it the same way.
They mandated patients and employees first.
Then they demanded EMS personnel mask up as well. This is the same hospital system that called security that had me escorted
from the building in front of my patient once before for refusing to put on a
face diaper.
And so he says,
Emory,
by the way,
kept their mask mandates the longest.
I believe they were one of the first to mandate in 2020 and they didn't lift
that mandate until late spring of this year.
I will not comply. Again, for anyone out there who happens to witness their EMS worker get
escorted from the hospital by security for mask mandate violations, they're trying to stand up for
your God-given right to breathe clean, fresh air. Sadly, I believe even fewer EMS workers
will rebel this time around.
The general attitude I see with my coworkers
is don't be the tall nail,
the tall nail that gets hammered down.
Yeah, that is such a sad attitude.
I remember about 30 years ago,
we had some, no, about 20 years ago,
we had some, no, about 20 years ago, we had some friends who, she was, she grew up in Japan,
and she said the attitude there with the Japanese people is everybody wants to conform.
Don't be the tall nail.
Everybody stay, keep your head down.
And I thought, wow, that's really sad.
But that's what it's become here in america as well
in 2020 we owe that to trump and his team for bringing that to america of course it was always
our choice to comply or not comply we found out what the vast majority of americans were made of
in 2020.
Interesting coincidence.
He said Emory Hospital's main campus is just a couple of blocks from the CDC here in Atlanta.
And that's where they had us transport that Ebola patient.
Back when that was in the news cycle.
Remember that?
We talked about that many times. You got the Ebola patient.
He's an illegal immigrant.
Came in sick. And it was in Dallas.
He had that same guy, the top elected official in Dallas.
They call him the county judge, Clay Jenkins.
And he was going around doing everything but licking the walls and saying,
see, it's not a problem.
This is great.
You know, it's Ebola.
You know, you die from hemorrhages through your eyes and everything else, right?
But he transported the family around.
Everybody said, no, it's not a problem.
He died.
He died.
Two nurses got infected.
They nearly died, but they didn't die.
But Clay Jenkins was saying, hey, we got a football game coming up.
Houston versus Dallas.
Go to it.
He says, we got hundreds or thousands of doctors and nurses. You'll be fine. You get sick, we'll take go to it. He says, we got hundreds of, uh, or thousands of doctors and nurses.
You'll be fine.
Well, you know, you get sick.
We'll take care of it.
Uh, that wasn't what he said before anybody died of COVID, you know, COVID isn't anything
like Ebola.
As a matter of fact, it wasn't serious at all.
Even if they tried to make it in a laboratory. It was a vaccine that did it.
But when that came around, it was Clay Jenkins
who shut down the business of that single mom.
She had a beauty parlor or a nail salon or something like that
trying to support her family.
He shut that down, tried to get her thrown in jail,
tried to get a big fine against her.
But, you know, Ebola comes down, oh, that's fine.
So he says, I'm sure that it's just a coincidence that the most tyrannical hospital system in atlanta and the cdc have such a close working relationship i'm sure that it's nothing
at all yeah that's right uh nursing homes are now being told that they need to mask up we've got
fear reports coming out of the same places,
interestingly enough, in New Jersey and New York.
What are the chances that after everything disappears,
that some variant would appear in exactly the same counties
where the nursing home problems were there before?
Is it a virus or is it the public health officials that are there?
It's the public health officials who are the virus.
And we need to clean them out.
So nursing homes have to boost their staff with new national standards.
And how is this going to be enforced by the Biden administration?
Well, they're going to do it through Medicare and Medicaid, through CMS,
the same thing that they used to reward people for doing what Trump told them to do.
You label somebody as COVID, just, you know, clinical diagnosis.
You don't have to have a test.
Just point the finger.
Say you've got COVID and we'll send you $13,000.
You put them on a ventilator, we'll give you $39,000.
And then after you've labeled them as COVID, we'll give you a 20% bonus on everything.
That was all run through CMS.
The American Hospital Association complained in August that they were not getting their 20% bonus in some of the cases because they were now saying, you have to show us your test.
And they said, well, you told us to do this at the beginning, and you said the test didn't work.
And you said you don't have enough of them anyway.
And now you're not going to pay up?
The CMS and the federal government under Trump works the same way as it does under Biden.
This is the way they do everything.
They bribe and blackmail.
Give you carrots and sticks with the money.
And that's what they're doing now in terms of minimum staffing levels for these nursing homes
before they get the money.
Now, that's not a problem.
I would favor that.
I mean, I don't favor the welfare state.
But, you know, if you've got Medicare and Medicaid and you're paying people in the nursing
homes, they should have some minimum staffing level.
What they're saying is staffing levels are too high to comply with.
But the principle is the
same if they're going to reward them for identifying people as covid patients financially
bribing them for medical malpractice will they then remove their cms funding if they don't do
masks if they don't do vaccines in the nursing homes. They're escalating that.
This is a massive program to kill people.
And so as the mask stuff comes back,
even Michael Smirconish at CNN is challenging Fauci.
And this is kind of interesting to watch this happen.
Here is Fauci in the exchange where he's challenged on,
well, yeah, we've got to bring back the mask.
It's a prudent thing to do.
And this guy calls him on it.
He says, we've got to study.
And it's a big study.
I'll tell you the details of the study after the clip.
But it's amazing.
Listen to how slippery Fauci is.
This guy doesn't skip a beat.
And he pivots and he says, well, maybe that's true when you're looking at a lot of people.
But we're talking about the individual.
It's like, wait a minute.
This is always about public health over
the individual's health this is why i've talked about this from the very beginning i said you
can't have public health if you ignore the health of the individuals there and if you're going to
look at the efficacy of your public health policies you would want to look at large population
but fauci doesn't care this guy is a bull face-faced liar, just as Kerry Mullins, who invented the PCR.
He says, he'll look straight in the camera and lie to your face.
I've challenged him for debates.
He can't use my PCR test the way he's using them for HIV and AIDS.
And, of course, they ran that same scam again and did it a couple of months after Kerry died, the guy who won the Nobel
Prize for the PCR test. Here's a clip. I would hope that if in fact we get to the point where
the volume of cases is such and organizations like the CDC recommend, CDC doesn't mandate
anything. I mean, yeah, right. Hear that? That people wear masks.
I would hope that they abide by the recommendation and take into account the risk to themselves and to their families. And again, we're not talking about forcing anybody to do anything.
Totally understood. There is a perception out there by many.
How many? I don't know that they don't work and that the data concludes that they didn't work
in the first go round. Respond to that on masks. Yeah, well, that's not so. I mean, when you're
talking about at the population level, that the data are less strong than knowing that if you look
on a situation as an individual protecting themselves or protecting them from spreading it. There's no doubt that
masks work. Different studies give different percentages of advantage of wearing it. But
there's no doubt that the weight of the online studies indicate the benefit of wearing masks.
I'm going to refer to one of them. You've heard about it before. I heard about it from a number
of radio callers.
Brett Stevens in The Times talked about Cochran. Put that on the screen.
The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illness, including COVID-19, was published last month.
Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is the lead author, were unambiguous.
There is just no evidence that they, masks, make any difference, he told the journalist Mayan Damasi.
Full stop.
But wait, hold on.
What about the N95 masks as opposed to the lower quality surgical or cloth masks?
Makes no difference.
None of it, he said.
Well, what about the studies that initially persuaded policymakers to impose mask mandates?
They were convinced by non-randomized studies, flawed observational studies.
How do we get beyond that finding of that particular review?
Yeah, but there are other studies, Michael, that show at an individual level for individual.
When you're talking about the effect on the epidemic or the pandemic as a whole,
the data are less strong.
But when you talk about as an individual basis of someone protecting themselves
or protecting themselves from spreading it to others,
there's no doubt that there are many studies that show that there is an advantage.
When you look at the broad population...
All face liar. all face liar all face liar now these were told you know we're told and and you know how people have reacted
to you when you didn't wear the mask you're going to kill us your kids need to be taken away from You're a threat. You had the very beginning of it.
You had Scott Adams writes the Dilbert cartoon.
Says getting harder and harder to tell these freedom lovers from sociopaths.
You were a sociopath if you didn't do this.
Well, if it was about individual health, why can't we make those determinations?
Oh, no, it was about public health. so you don't get to make those determinations we didn't mandate anything he said
coercion is not a choice coercion was mandate no jab no job you know don't wear the mask you don't
don't even ask to be seated at a table, that type of thing.
And where did this mostly happen?
It mostly happened in private businesses.
They were the ones who gave them this very thin veneer,
so thin that we can all clearly see through it,
this very thin veneer of plausible deniability.
As I said before, this is where we are right now.
And these people are all saying, Fauci as well as Trump, you know, I didn't do it.
I didn't do it.
It wasn't me, right?
It was those people below me.
They've taken, just as they turn the Constitution upside down and inside out, just as they turn every law and every principle that organized our country
upside down and inside out,
they've done the same thing with the Nuremberg excuse.
It's not, I was just following orders from the people low down.
I just do whatever they tell me.
I don't think about it.
I don't worry about the moral or legal implications.
I just follow the orders, right? Now now they're saying i didn't order anybody where'd they get this idea
fauci trump where'd they get that idea so again uh you heard him say this is cnn and the new york
times coming out against fauci flawed observational observational studies, said Tom Jefferson at Oxford,
who put together this stuff.
That's too charitable, quite frankly.
They knew.
They knew.
As a matter of fact, for years I talked about this.
It's been a while since I talked about it.
I think the year was 2002, but I remember that it was New South Wales.
And I remember that it was the same doctor who discovered, she said, the Parvo virus for dogs.
But she did a study about masks, and she said, well, they're completely ineffective after 20 minutes.
And she said, at that point in time, you get so much saliva saturation on these masks that the pressure of your breath is pushing these particles out.
And you get smaller particles that travel farther and remain airborne longer.
So you're actually exacerbating the spread of this if you've got it.
And of course, the masks themselves, you know, that's what it's supposed to stop. Everybody knows that if you, according to the virus theory, it's so small that to say that you're going to stop it with any of these masks, including an N95, is absurd.
It's like saying I'm going to stop mosquitoes by putting up a chain link fence.
So it's not going to stop the airborne particles i say well this is to stop
the viral particles that are mixed in with your saliva but she said after 20 minutes that doesn't
help and then we had the german study that was done uh after all this madness began
and it looked at what it does to you as an individual and the fact that uh you're when you breathe out that's one of the ways that your body
eliminates waste and so what you were actually doing is inhaling back in your waists and so they
notice a big uptick and disease for people who are wearing the mask and you can it's on their
face you can see the mask the pimples on the people's face that have to wear it all day.
In some of these jobs.
And it was never allowed by OSHA.
They said if you're working in a really dusty environment where you've got big dust particles and those masks can actually help,
you can't wear it for more than 20 minutes because people are going to be able to take that off, give them a break,
let them take the mask off, let them breathe some air. No, they're not going to do that anymore they're going to have you wear
that thing all day breathing back in your waist your disease bringing it deeper in and that's what
he found out was that it uh any um any bacteriological things that just takes it back
down deeper kind of the same type of stuff they were doing with the ventilator, right?
You know, giving people bacterial infections. This is a filthy, stupid
lie these masks are. And Fauci
is a filthy, stupid liar.
He's pushed this. He continues to push it. He continues to
reposition himself with a new lie every day in response to this.
On Rumble, Tyrannosaurus Radio.
Thank you very much for the tip.
It says there is an Ebola outbreak at Burning Man right now, apparently.
I saw that as a rumor.
I think the best description of what's going on there is Sodom and Gomorrah.
And they're stuck in the miry clay.
Go back to Psalm 40.
You know, these people, it is this nonstop orgy of drugs and sex.
And basically, they do stupid stuff.
You wind up with stupid consequences.
Who knows what they've got?
Probably Ebola is the least of their worries are the kind of sexual disease transmissions I've got there in the drugs and the occult stuff and everything
else on Rockfin.
Angus Mustang.
Lots of sheeple wearing masks on the plane today.
Giving me flashbacks to 2020.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Uh,
Zoxo Vazozon.
That's my guess as to how you might pronounce that on Rockfin.
The people that stayed on YouTube and played those games brainwashed themselves for that access,
and some paid a high price for it.
Well, you know, that's the whole thing is we don't want to live by lies, right?
Yeah, that's the tyrant's game.
You know, you got to say that two plus two equals five.
You got to pull that back and not go down that path.
So anyway, we've known that for quite some time.
We've known that it's bad for the user to have a mask on.
This is one of the things in this study.
They said, well, you know, we have now definitively proven with these studies that they absolutely
do not work.
But they said studies need to be done to look at the harm that they do.
That's the other part of that study.
Rand Paul never misses a chance to criticize Fauci.
Good.
I just wish that Rand Paul would criticize pharmaceutical people,
that he would give people the truth about this vaccine
and all the rest of this stuff.
And about Gilead and remdesivir
that his wife bought stock in.
He says,
Fauci admits that masks
don't work for the public at large,
but still absurdly claims
that masks work on an individual basis.
More subterfuge.
Yeah, that's exactly right uh switch it to suit
yourself and um yeah until now they've always disregarded individual health and i talked about
this he cannot have public health if you disregard individual health and so now he's saying yeah but
you know it's uh individual health that's what this is about well then i get to make my individual
choice all of your mandates and your quote-unquote recommendations and the penalties that came with But, you know, it's the individual health that's what this is about. Well, then I get to make my individual choice.
All of your mandates and your quote-unquote recommendations and the penalties that came with it,
you know, all of that stuff was based on the fact that, well, you don't get to decide about this because this affects all of us.
So it's not your body, your choice that they always talk about.
We're going to tell you what to do.
So the study, uh, says, um, antiviral drugs and vaccines may be insufficient
to prevent the spread of these severe acute respiratory syndromes, SARS, and that type of thing.
And they said, this is an update of a Cochrane review last published in 2020. They knew this in 2020.
But what they've done is they've now added another 11 randomized control trials.
And so that brings the total up to 78.
Now, I don't know how many of these things they had in 2020, but they published it in 2020.
And they said this stuff doesn't work.
We've known this for a very, very long time.
We knew it even before it was, but common sense would tell you that, again, airborne particles, you're not going to stop them.
You're not going to stop them from coming out around the sides i've used to i had pinned for months at the top of my twitter feed a picture of somebody
uh blowing smoke with a mask on and it came out the sides and top through it all the rest of it
right and that's exactly what fauci was doing he was blowing smoke at all of us and trump as well. And so they have now 78 random controlled trials.
They've added another 11 recently.
Said two from Mexico, one from Denmark, Bangladesh, England, Norway, etc., etc.
This is all over the world.
People have been studying this.
We have the data.
Fauci doesn't care about data.
He's not doing science. Science is based based on data science is based on experiments science is based on random control trials and other things
like that no he wants this to be his pronouncements his opinions because he is science
so they said the risk of um a bias for these random control trials that was mostly high or
unclear medical surgical masks compared to no masks we included 12 trials that looked at this
wearing masks the conclusion says in the community makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness.
And we have a 95% confidence interval on that based on looking at these trials.
So explain that to us, Fauci, will you please?
Come up with some plausible lie at least.
These new 11 trials that they added to the existing 67, these new 11, just those 11, had 34,503 participants.
Pretty broad.
They said there was no clear difference between the use of medical surgical masks compared with N95 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection.
And they said, but then what we found out was the harms,
the harms caused by these masks has not been investigated sufficiently.
It's been under-investigated.
So that's the reality of where we are.
And yet, you know, he says he's got to wear them anyway.
Got to wear them.
And remember that, you know,
Trump really wanted Fauci's approval with all this stuff.
So I played for you on Thursday.
This is from the Trump 2020 campaign,
talking about how he was Fauci's little sidekick.
The president has listened to what I have said and what the other people on the task force have said. The first and only time that I went in and said we should do mitigation strongly,
the response was, yes, we'll do it. When he suggests, why don't we do this? And I say,
no, that's really not a good idea from a scientific standpoint.
He has never overruled me.
The travel was another recommendation.
When we went in and said, we probably should be doing that.
And the answer was yes.
When I've made recommendations, he's taken them.
And then another time was we should do it with Europe.
And the answer was yes.
He's never countered or overridden me.
And the next time we should do it with the UK.
And the answer was yes.
I never.
Trump was a yes man.
I've done that.
I said, for scientific reasons, we really should do this.
That he hasn't said, let's do it.
The first and only time that Dr.
Birx and I went in and formally made a recommendation to the president to actually have a quote shutdown the president
listened to the recommendation and went to the mitigation yeah vote for trump vote for pence
yeah i look at that i just the thing that astonished me the most about that was not
that trump was a yes man not that he was a flunky not that he was uh you know abbott to uh
fauci's costello you know uh oh you know hdq i heard that's really good and maybe we can inject
sunlight into veins maybe that would do it as well oh come on says fauci you don't know what
you're talking about i'm the science guy here You just say yes when I talk to you, okay?
Publicly did that.
And Trump single-handedly discredited HCQ and ivermectin,
as we talked about last week.
People saying, hey, we were using this stuff and it's very effective.
Then Trump came out and endorsed it. And then Fauci used him as a court jester for President Fauci.
That's what Trump was, a court jester for him.
Yes, man.
And then at that point, it was full-on war against Ivermectin and HCQ.
And Trump put that clip together, talking about how he was Fauci's yes man,
Fauci's court jester.
I did everything Fauci told me to do.
And then at the end, his last day in office, he gives Fauci and Birx an Operation Warp
Speed Medal, Special Medal of Commendation for excellent work done.
Trump's voters wanted him to fire him.
But, you know, I saw stuff like that.
It's one of the reasons why I told people I'm not voting for Trump.
You need to understand which side, at least with Biden, you know who he's playing for.
Trump is a fifth column backstabbing Benedict Donald.
As recently as this May, Fauci said unvaccinated children should still mask up when playing with their friends.
This May, this May.
But this study, before they added these 11 random controlled trials, when they only had 67 of them,
they put this out from the Cochran Library.
They said wearing masks is pointless.
There's still no evidence that masks are effective during a pandemic,
said Tom Jefferson.
And at that point in time in February,
but then you have three months later,
masks,
um,
Fauci still saying,
yeah,
you got to wear them in the playground,
all this stuff.
At least they're not telling people where two or three masks at a time.
What ridiculous nonsense.
There's no evidence that they work,
that they make any difference.
Full stop.
You heard that quote that was read to Fauci by Michael Smirconish.
When you're talking about the effect on the epidemic or the pandemic as a whole,
Fauci said, well, the data is less strong there.
Less strong.
No, it's been misproven.
Strong data says that they don't work. 35,000 plus people in just the recent 11 random controlled trials.
So they don't work.
So what's still a question?
And their mind is the harm that's done to the where that's the only question that hasn't been studied sufficiently.
Yeah, but there's other studies, Michael, that show the individual level.
You know, for these individuals, it might be protective.
No, not at all.
Zero, zip, nada.
And then we're talking about, well, then it doesn't have anything to do with the herd.
I heard something about immunity, right?
Herd immunity.
It's something I heard from Fauci.
You notice how they stopped talking about herd immunity?
Fauci's not talking about herd immunity with the vaccines or the mask or any of this stuff now oh now we're back to individual
health dr burks is now on the other side of this she's flipped 180 degrees uh she says we don't
need to mandate oh we never mandated we made recommendations yeah i'm recommending that you
don't you know it's kind of like the protection racket, you know.
Yeah, I think you need to pay me some money
so that nothing happens to your business here, right?
It'd be a shame.
It's a beautiful place.
I'd hate to see something happen to this place.
I can make sure that nothing happens
because, you know, if you don't pay me,
something might happen.
We need to actually empower people with the information they need for themselves
and their families because every family is different.
This is Deborah Birx saying this now?
After two years of saying the opposite, you got Fauci now saying,
well, this is for the individual to decide.
We know it doesn't work from a public health standpoint,
but it's for the individual.
Birx goes even further.
This is for the individual and the family to decide.
And by the way, playing outside is safe.
Playgrounds are safe.
Really?
Wow.
I guess we can believe it now because Fauci and Burks,
well, at least Burks says so.
Now that she says this, the Trump media is happy to report that.
But, you know, the fact that she was Trump's pick, he put her on the Operation Warp Speed thing.
And he kept her there and gave her a medal for that as well.
And so this is a headline from Zero Hedge.
Trump lockdown tyrant.
Does a 180, says no new masks, no new mask mandates. Uh, and as I point out,
a former military researcher, AIDS researcher,
that's how she got hooked up without you. He created that whole AIDS thing.
And he was, I played for you the clips where he said, yeah, you know,
you got to keep your distance. You can, you can catch it. The, the AIDS,
you know, from just being around somebody like that.
Remember how they excoriated people for saying
when Fauci claimed that he had proof
that it was caused by a virus and so forth,
and it's in the blood and all the rest of the stuff,
and everybody was saying, then can mosquitoes transfer?
I mean, that was a logical conclusion
of Fauci's lies about AIDS.
We know none of that is true now.
Of course, he also tried to push remdesivir as a cure for AIDS.
But he really rode that into prominence.
And so, you know, the people who said that, who went to the logical conclusion, assuming that Fauci was telling them the truth, which he wasn't't they were excoriated you know you are pushing uh homophobia
if you say this could be transferred by mosquitoes and things like that but that was a logical
conclusion from what he was telling people so she got connected with uh fauci with the aids research
but as they point out on zero hedgeedge, she had no training, no experience,
no publications in epidemiology or in public health policy.
Why did Trump put her on?
I don't know.
He didn't use the best people, did he?
He didn't pick the best people, did he?
His picks were horrible, including this.
Except that if you want somebody who's going to push a political agenda,
they don't need to have training, experience, publications.
They don't need to know anything about epidemiology.
They just need to follow the orders, and that's what Trump was doing as well.
He was following the orders to these people.
She had a similar role in dictating how the Trump task force was telling the country to lock down for the pandemic.
In March of 2020, Birx and Fauci were grinning like Cheshire cats, writes ZeroEdge,
as they laid out an unprecedented lockdown and masking strategy,
which Birx later admitted they pulled out of their behinds.
Now that we're revisiting mask mandates over the latest COVID-19 surge,
they're seemingly on different sides of the debate.
So she goes on on Sunday and says, we don't need to mandate.
Oh, but, uh, she called it a mandate.
Do you see that?
Uh, she's a little bit too clever.
You know,
he's going to play around.
Well,
we didn't mandate anything.
We made recommendations here.
Uh,
and so person says,
okay,
here we are,
you know,
now we're into,
into this for years and we don't need a mandate anymore.
Uh,
so,
uh,
when you look at,
at,
uh,
Trump again,
Trump says fear mongering about the new COVID
variants is a lunatic ploy to rig the 2024 election, the epic times headline.
So it's all about rigging the election.
Is it?
Well, was that what the 2020 version that you did Trump?
Was that what that was about that?
Did you do that to rig the election?
Did you do that to rig the election with the mail out all the ballot stuff and everything?
Was this a long-term plan?
Was this like a professional wrestling thing where you pose as the anti-globalist and the globalists say, oh, yeah, he's horrible.
You know, he's against us and everything.
And then you get all of the people who would have opposed this if Hillary had done it, if Biden had done it.
All of those people just, well, maybe they don't comply, but they don't actively resist and oppose it.
They just kind of shut up and sit down because Trump is running this thing.
Was that what this was all about? And then Trump puts in the
mail
election, you know,
mail out ballots to everybody.
The more the merrier.
Harvest the ballots and all the rest of the stuff. And then when he
loses, he calls foul.
He sets up this whole January the 6th thing.
And now he is setting
this up so that,
you know, again, playing by the same rules that he's
already lost by once he is setting himself up to get the nomination lose the general election
and then push us into a civil war that's the next step this is the left right progression
this is the tag team professional wrestling stuff oh yeah yeah, Trump's on your side, right?
Remember, he's now out there saying this. The left-wing lunatics
are trying very hard to bring
back COVID lockdowns and mandates
with all of their sudden
fear-mongering. Who did that
in 2020? You did it. Gee whiz,
you know what else is coming? An election.
They want to restart the COVID hysteria
so they can justify more lockdowns,
more censorship, more illegal drop boxes, more mail-in ballots, and trillions of dollars in payoffs to their political allies heading into the 2024 election.
Does that sound familiar?
Yeah, because you did it.
These are sick people we're dealing with.
But to every COVID tyrant who wants to take away our freedom, hear these words.
We will not comply.
We will continue to lie.
That's really what he should say.
Trump continues to lie.
You heard the list there, right?
These left-wing lunatics.
It's the left-wing lunatics.
It's not him.
Fear Mongering.
Want to reintroduce their left-wing lockdown and mandate policies that was all done
under his administration all of that was done under his administration uh and as a matter of
fact he took credit for it you know not not only the fact that he was fauci's yes man but as i
showed this to you on thursday put out a post for the purpose of creating conflict and confusion
some of the fake news media are saying that it is their governor's decision to open up the states. Not that
of the president of the United States, the federal government.
Let it be fully understood. This is incorrect.
It is the decision of the president, and for many
reasons. He shut it down. He opens it up.
Right?
Yeah. Trump giveth
and Trump taketh away your freedoms.
It's all about him.
He did everything.
But anyway,
he said,
I'm going to warn these tyrants
to take away your freedoms
like I did in 2020.
You know, these people want it today.
They are tyrants.
So, yeah.
But here's a conspiracy theory.
Perhaps Trump did this
for his masters, you think?
Yeah, possibly. Listen to what he had to say with fox
news because fox news is selling this mask stuff say well you know you hear this is a good thing
and they go to trump white house and the guy says you know goldman sachs says this will be good
don't you think you should do this oh yeah i think probably we should i don't believe so
disappear i do i do yeah sure at some point and I think probably we should. I don't believe so.
Disappear. I do, I do.
Yeah, sure, at some point.
And I think we're going to have a vaccine very soon, too.
Speaking of COVID-19, Goldman Sachs put out a model yesterday saying that
A model?
If there were universal masks, it would be a net positive for GDP.
We know the IHME model says that if there were universal masks,
that it would be beneficial, it would save lives. So if there is an economic benefit, sir, and there is a public health benefit,
sir, why not go forward and say there should be mandatory masks all across this country?
Well, I don't know if you need mandatory because you have many places in the country where
people stay very long distance. You talk about social distancing, but I'm all for masks.
I think masks are good. I would wear if I were in a group of people and I was close. You would wear one. Oh, I would, I
would, oh I have. I mean people have seen me wearing one. If I'm in a group of
people where we're not, you know, ten feet away and, but usually I'm not in that
position and everyone's tested because I'm the president. They get tested before
they see me, but if I were in a tight situation with people, I would absolutely.
Do you think the public will see that at some point?
I mean, I'd have no problem.
Actually, I had a mask on.
I sort of liked the way I looked.
Okay.
I thought it was okay.
It was a dark black mask, and I thought it looked okay.
It looked like the Lone Ranger.
Looked like Darth Vader.
I have no problem with that.
I think, and if people feel good about it.
Bane. Bane of our existence. Yeah, you know goldman sachs says foxes goldman sachs says it'd be good
they've got a model they got a computer model says it'd be good yeah yeah pretty soon ai ai
says it'll be good and and goldman sachs has got an ai that says it's going to be good so yeah how do we
justify lockdowns censorship illegal drop boxes mail-in ballots and trillions of dollars in
payoffs to political allies which is everything that he did he's now projecting it on other people
amazing uh they rigged the 2020 election and they're going to do the same thing again.
And he admits, nearly, that it was all a plandemic.
Oh, so this wasn't about the virus?
This was about rigging the election?
And so how did you use it, Trump?
So, again, you know, was this taking orders from Goldman Sachs and the rest of these people? Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk, says,
there's a plot to push Covidian tyranny and lock you down again just in time for the election.
Just mimic everything that Trump has to say, Charlie.
That's your job.
Trump does what Fauci says, and he repeats it he executes it
and then charlie kirk and his sycophantic maga media people right like him of his ilk they do
whatever trump says so they're basically pushing what fauci says right uh so again you know uh
deborah brooks was two and a half years late on all this stuff now charlie
kirk has come around as well two and a half years late uh but yeah finally he gets it uh and then
trump said if he is elected he would use every available authority to push back on mask and
vaccine mandates uh cutting federal funding that's how he would do
it right what did i say when all this stuff was on i said he's paying the governors republican
and democrat to do what he wants and if they don't do what he wants he cuts their funding
but he gave him so much money these governors had gavin newsom cuomo people like brad little in idaho these people had
several times the amount of money that the entire state budget was at their personal discretion to
use to buy political power and favors from people so they're going to do exactly what Trump and Fauci wanted to do.
And I said, uh, you know, the buck stops with the president,
but the buck also starts with the president and that's how they get their
policies out there. And so he says,
I would cut federal funding to colleges or airlines that have mandates like this. And, uh,
except that he paid them to have these kinds of mandates at the beginning,
he paid the airlines, right?
They got a lot of relief.
You do what I say.
Oh, we're going to hit you with fines and things like that.
The interesting thing about this is that he promises that if he is elected for a second term, he will do the things that DeSantis did as governor.
Because that's all the stuff that Trump didn't do that. DeSantis did as governor. Because that's all the stuff that DeSantis, Trump didn't do that.
DeSantis did those things.
He said, it's going to push back on mask and vaccine mandates.
Going to punish people downstream of the state government by withholding their funds.
Trump didn't do that.
He did just the opposite of that.
And then, of course, Biden is saying, you know, he's popping in for a new vaccine. He says, this one works and we're going to make sure that everybody gets it.
So, uh, the Trump press is calling it the election variant.
Uh, no, uh, 2020 was Trump's election variant.
And that election variant, unfortunately is still with us.
Uh, who's going to get rid of this vote by mail stuff.
Why isn't anybody talking about that? We don't need to have that now. unfortunately, is still with us. Who's going to get rid of this vote-by-mail stuff?
Why isn't anybody talking about that?
We don't need to have that now.
There's no lockdown.
And so they're saying, well, you know, they left that in place,
just like they've left their usurped power in place.
And so that's why these people are saying, well,
we're going to do the election again like we did in 2020?
Everybody stay home?
If you don't take these stay home. If you don't
take these things away, if you
don't take away the power that they grabbed, if you don't
take away these new rules that Trump put in,
yeah, they're going to do it exactly the
same way. One way or the
other. Rockfin,
thank you very much, Eric. I appreciate the tip.
That's very kind. Appreciate that.
So,
New Jersey nursing home. Slammed by COVID surge as COVID deaths rise.
And they say this county was also hit especially hard at the height of the COVID and was recorded more than 448 outbreaks since early 2020.
Again, why is it in this particular county, Bergen County, just northwest of New York City?
Is it something about COVID that it just loves that environment there or something?
Is it in the soil or something there in that county?
Or maybe it's the people who are declaring the pandemic.
Maybe it's not a bug.
Maybe it's the bureaucrats who are bugging us.
Is that what that is why would it be the same you kick off the here's the first county and they got it the worst
and now they're getting it first again and the worst again seriously why can't people see this
now here's the good news is okay you hang tough hang tough, you stand up for your freedom, you know,
you don't know what's going to happen. There's no guarantee that you're going to win, but you
could win big. We've seen a lot of people win big. And here's another situation. A fired professor
wins a key victory in her free speech case over mask and vaccine policy. Patricia Griffin, who says she was fired for asking questions,
asking questions when they announced what their mask and vaccination policies
were going to be.
She had some questions.
I've got some questions.
You're fired.
She was granted a narrow win after the university filed a motion
to dismiss the case in part.
The judge, U.S. District Judge John Levy, ruled that while her First Amendment claim can proceed, other charges were dismissed.
So she's going to sue them on that.
They don't want to make this about the vaccine.
They make it about her First Amendment rights.
But look, we'll make it about anything that we can.
Make these people pay
for what they did your first amendment rights of free speech and questions your religious
beliefs all these are whatever you can get these people for go after them punish them because the
government's not going to do anything the gop establishment trump none of these people
going to do anything to stop any of this so make them them pay. Make these companies pay. Make these universities pay.
Trump says, well, I'm going to cut their money off. They probably won't. You cut their money off.
Do a lawsuit. Look, it's a lot less riskier than Governor DeWine's lottery. Remember that?
You know, hey, get a vaccine and I'll put your name in a hat and you might win a million dollars.
And if you lose, you might die or be disabled the rest of your life.
With this, the worst that happens on the downside is you lose your job and you don't get any compensation for it.
You lose a job working for a bunch of creeps who think they get to dictate to you everything
in your life.
That's not much of a
loss quite frankly and long term you'll find it it's a benefit but you might if you resist this
stuff and push back on these people you might win the lottery as well so again that's the way that
we need to respond to this thing do not comply don't listen to Trump's lies. By the way, the nurse that was talking in the video that played last week,
that was from back in 2020.
Even then, I think I said it was recent.
I had not seen that before.
But even then, people understood what this is.
Oh, two weeks from now?
How do you know two weeks from now this is going to happen
or two months from now this is going to happen?
I said that all along. saw that from trump we saw it from biden we saw it from macron
we saw it from trudeau every one of these globalist leaders regardless of whether they
posed as globalist leaders or not they all did the same thing in new zealand the new prime minister who replaced
jab senda arden is now denying that vaccines were compulsory same line same lie as fauci we we didn't
make you do it yeah we did yeah um and uh so um rebecca barnett says we're at the quote. No one made you take it.
It was your choice stage of the pandemic.
New Zealand's new prime minister, Chris Hipkins.
Time reporters on Sunday in terms of the vaccine mandates.
I acknowledge it was a difficult time for people, but they ultimately made their own choices.
There was no compulsory vaccination.
People made their own choices. was no compulsory vaccination people made their own choices
oh really was that um you know the no jab no job see it's a choice it's a choice he's not forcing
anybody to do this stuff jab send to arden said if you want a sun if you want summer if you want
to go to bars and restaurants get vaccinated if you want to get a haircut get vaccinated if you want summer, if you want to go to bars and restaurants, get vaccinated.
If you want to get a haircut, get vaccinated.
If you want to go to a concert or a festival, get vaccinated.
If you want to go to a gym or a sporting event, get vaccinated.
If you are not vaccinated, these are everyday things that you're going to miss out on.
So it was your choice, right?
Says Rebecca Barnett. Another one. It's one if a mugger pulls a gun on you
says give me your wallet technically you don't have to comply yeah no you know it's like your
money or your life you got a choice right uh they hold the gun to your head
your money or your life yeah see thank you for voluntarily uh complying with the income tax rule so you're basically said you probably don't see it like this i said reporter but there's two
different classes of people this reporter said to jab send to arden at the time so if you're
vaccinated or unvaccinated you have all these rights if you're vaccinated. And Jabson to Arden said, yep, that's what it is.
Yep.
Yeah.
So there you go.
Choice.
He says, I've said all along, Trump was already running this scam.
And I told people, well, you're not voting for Trump.
We know that Biden's going to mandate stuff.
And I said, people will understand that Biden is mandating it.
They don't understand that Trump is coercing it
and that he's already doing it through companies
who are complying with his orders
that he's repeating from Fauci.
And, you know, it is,
does it with carrots and bribery
in the same way that DeWine did it.
And then the Democrats come along and they get rougher and they say,
well, you know, we're going to no more bribes.
We're just going to blackmail you.
You do it or else.
And I said, at least at that point,
especially because it's a partisan thing now.
Oh, that's a Democrat giving me orders?
Well, I'm not taking orders from a Democrat.
I'd take them from Trump because he's playing 4D chess. But I'm not taking any orders
from any Democrat. And so they'll push back for that
and they'll push back because they understand that it's an order.
They've got a misplaced trust in Trump.
And so this is
what it looked like in Australia.
There's a woman, about a half dozen cops.
People are there filming it and hectoring the cops,
but they dare not get physical with the cops because the cops have a license to kill, right?
Like James Bond or something.
I said I didn't know.
I'm happy to show you my information.
What are you doing?
Why are you pulling that back?
Leave her alone.
Leave her alone. Leave her alone.
You pay my taxes.
You pay my wages.
I'm happy to provide my name and address.
You cannot arrest her.
You can't arrest me.
You have been arrested.
This is ridiculous.
Yeah, they can do whatever they want.
They're the police.
They got a uniform and a title.
You guys are filth.
I'm sorry.
Sorry for what?
Filth.
Yeah, the big guy.
Big guy there.
Big cop with a mask.
You guys are filth.
Oh, yeah?
What?
What'd you say about that?
You're filth. Oh, yeah? What? What did you say about that? You're filth.
Like that guy last week.
I got four years law enforcement or 40 years or whatever it was.
I didn't realize that you hate the police.
I hate the police that use their authority like that.
There are police who follow their oath to the Constitution.
They get fired.
They get purged.
These people get promoted.
You want to talk about what they're doing in Maui, other places like that?
Oh, well, you hate the police then. No, I hate institutions that have been corrupted because they embrace that kind of behavior, because they push that kind of behavior out,
because they push the people who refuse to engage in that kind of behavior out.
They're left with a certain class of people like that tall guy who was going to come over there
and get in the face of the person who's reporting. travis tells me it's harps birthday in australia so happy birthday
harps uh happier times this year than it was three years ago right um so hopefully we're not going to
let them do this to us again many of us didn't let them do it the first time. And so, again, the same article.
Signed in a Perth doctor's clinic during the height of the workplace vaccine mandates.
COVID vaccines are, all uppercase, mandatory in some industries.
All vaccines have to be consented to.
Please do not abuse our staff if you feel coerced into your vaccine.
There you go.
Choice.
So here we are.
Nobody made you take it, right?
That's what they're going to say.
You know, when you have uncontrollable tremors or you're paralyzed or your family member is dead, nobody made you take it.
You took it voluntarily because, you know, your kid took it because wanted to be in your in the junior varsity basketball team or something and now he's
had a heart attack and he's dead but it was your choice a florida physician who was fired and this
is a dr john little i played the video when this happened he had been fighting with the board there in Florida and DeSantis is Florida and Latipo
is attorney, uh, surgeon general, um, uh, territory.
He was fighting this stuff and he went to speak up at a public meeting talking about
how, um, there was only one allowed treatment and that treatment didn't work.
And the stuff that they
knew worked was being kept from people when he spoke up about that they stripped him of his
board certification he has taken legal action and he now has that back a longtime family physician
in ocala and a medical school professor began posting video sharing his thoughts about covet 19
testing treatments and vaccines early on in the so-called pandemic.
He was frustrated to find his content was often pulled down from his YouTube channel.
So he moved his content to Rumble.
Then in January of 2022, and again five months later, he received warning letters from the American Board of Family Medicine.
A letter said that his videos on YouTube and Rumble spread, quote, medical misinformation and could put his board certification in jeopardy.
So when he showed up in person to speak against these hospital policies, that's when they pulled it.
And at the center of his persecution was ivermectin.
Well, when we come back, we're going to talk before we leave the medical stuff and get into um
some of the spiritual sickness of this country uh joe rogan andrew tate uh woody allen emma stone
all the rest of the stuff both left and right you know it truly is amazing we're going to talk
about that but i got another thing to talk about in terms of the pharmaceutical war that is going on between pfizer and moderna it appears that there is no honor among thieves
imagine my surprise and there's no honor among mass murderers either the two of them are after
each other because there is a big tidal wave of vaccines using mRNA technology on the way.
And they both want to have that entire pile of money for themselves.
On Rumble, BusyB777, thank you for the tip.
Last week, Oren Schroer of InfoWars also said the line,
nobody made anyone take the vaccine.
Did he really?
Well, nobody made anybody go to the Capitol
on January 6th either, Owen.
Trump supporters don't care.
They're excusing Fauci and Borla and the rest
if it means that they can excuse Trump.
Yeah, that's what it is.
That's what it is.
Yeah, they're playing 40 chess
and you are their pawns.
We'll be right back. Thank you. Succes! Thank you. Making sense common again.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, on Rumble, thank you very much, Christo.
I appreciate the tip.
Thank you again for your hard work.
Well, thank you.
But, you know, this is the time that we live in, folks.
We live in interesting times.
And, you know, God has chosen to put us in such a time as this so it's up to us to um
to toe the line and to keep the course on this stuff look pfizer as i said before then the court battle he just kind of sat back and enjoy it i remember when people said you know
you look at the iran iraq war what do you do you just sit back and hope they both lose. I hope both Pfizer and Moderna both lose in this thing.
They have asked the U.S.
Court to revoke Moderna's patents for COVID-19 vaccine technology.
Here's the way I see this rolling out.
And I think I've said this before, but I haven't said it too often.
If you go back and you look at Operation Warp Speed, and of course,
Fauci was running this thing and who did he put and charge technically of operation warp speed moncef slowy and if you
go back and you look uh moncef slowy and fauci as i said before uh i started researching moncef
slowy i'd not heard of him before but when i started looking i found that he and francis collins and fauci were like you know three amigos every time they have one of these pharmaceutical
things they're out there talking and by the way in the last few years before this happened in the
late teens they were all pushing electroceuticals and that's you know the thing to come after the
mrna stuff and um so you know electroceuticals
wave of the future and everything but also the mrna thing and it was not the first time that
fauci and moncef slowy had collaborated he had been the head of vaccine technology i can't remember
the name of i think it was merc but i'm not sure if it was Merck or it was a different one.
But one of the big drug companies, Monsef Slaoui, had been the chief of the vaccine stuff.
And so they had worked together on some of these HPV vaccines.
But they'd also worked together and pushed out pandemrics with the swine flu thing.
And I've mentioned that in the past several times because in Scandinavian countries where they didn't have the political pressure to not look and to say nothing and to see no evil,
hear no evil,
speak no evil about the pharmaceutical companies. They actually identified that they had a large number of kids
who had been given pandemrix,
the thing that Monsaft-Slowey's company came up with that Fauci pushed.
A large percentage of kids who got narcolepsy or catalepsy.
And narcolepsy just makes you fall asleep uh at really uh you know suddenly at unexpected times
narcolepsy makes you freeze and of course there's been stories uh edgar allen poe it's a very rare
thing but edgar allen poe you know did that in premature burial and it's been uh i think uh
arthur conan doyle did that in one of his Sherlock Holmes things. But it's very strange.
We saw some pictures of people getting that kind of adverse reaction with these COVID shots as well.
But they had worked together.
And in Scandinavia, they said, you know, you're giving this to the kids.
And, you know, that was a little over a decade ago.
Now these kids, some of them in their early to mid-20s, there was a year or two ago, one of them committed suicide because they could not have a life, couldn't do anything.
The narcolepsy was so bad.
Couldn't drive a car, might fall asleep suddenly, that type of thing.
So they had rushed a flu type of vaccine out without doing sufficient testing once before they had
been partners at a lot of these different conferences. And so, you know, you go back
again to the Trump dog and pony show that staged for television, where he gets all the different
drug companies in at the table, literally. And he goes to the first one, how long is it going to
take you? Oh, that's way too long. Next one, a little bit less time, but still way too long.
On and on down there.
And they get to Moderna.
Moderna says, well, we got mRNA.
And we can do it right now because we'll make your body manufacture the antigen.
And we don't have to go through the manufacturing.
All right, that's it.
You're going to do it.
Make you the head of Operation Warp Speed.
The whole thing was staged.
They even had the different companies there in descending order
of how long it was going to take them
to manufacture this stuff.
And so I've said from the very beginning
that this whole thing was set up
by Fauci and Slaoui
to help Moderna, help his pal.
He was going to participate in it somehow.
I bet if you look,
eventually somebody's going to find out.
There's probably some kind of financial kickback there to Fauci.
That's my hunch.
But again, no receipts for that.
That's just a hunch.
Maybe they're just really good friends and he just wanted to see his friend make tens of millions of dollars.
Who knows?
Or billions.
But, you know, they were there and they had the stuff ready to go. And it was my opinion that the stuff, and we know, because we've seen how a lot of
this stuff was already pre, you know, pre done, uh, they're ready to roll this stuff
out, uh, in anticipation of this.
And then Pfizer got in a Pfizer is a big corrupt company.
That's got lots of manufacturing muscle.
And so they shoved their way in and kind of leapfrogged over Moderna.
And so Moderna sued them for violating their patents.
And now Pfizer is fighting them in court.
Even after, you know, Pfizer has been blackmailing people, blackmailing, not people, but governments, entire governments, countries.
Three of them in Scandinavia, not Scandinavia, South America, talked about it, Brazil, Argentina, and a third unnamed country that eventually complied with their blackmail stuff and said that you've got to hold us harmless from any manufacturing negligence, any other things like that,
in addition to the fact that we just rushed this thing through untested.
Of course, that's a given.
You're going to not charge us for that.
But if we're really sloppy and careless,
if we do things like have the active ingredient vary from 3 micrograms to 100 micrograms, a factor of 33,
you're not going to come after us for manufacturing stuff.
And you're going to guarantee this by giving us title to property that is
outside of your country.
That's you're going to back it up with that.
And so some of them went public and it's not just those central South
American countries.
We've now had countries in Europe and other places who have come out talking
about that.
Al Pfizer is trying to blackmail them.
Now they're saying that Moderna's patents are so broad that they essentially co-opt the entire field of messenger RNA technology.
And there's going to be a big bunch of stuff coming down the pipe from the American government.
This is a gold mine, this mRNA stuff.
The patents are unimaginably broad and cover technology
that was known long before 2015 when Moderna says it developed the technology,
says one of the filings.
They point to experiments that Dr. Robert Malone and others reported in 1990
in Science Magazine, and test described in
a 1993 paper in the European journal of immunology.
And so Robert Malone has something to say about this.
Now he said,
it's interesting to watch this fight here.
And now he finds himself at the center of this,
his work,
a subsequent improvements to the technology,
such as using lipid nanoparticles to deliver the messenger RNA, were also described in public materials before Moderna requested patents, say the filing. When they were organized, they operated for 10 years without ever having a profit,
without ever having any product go to market. They were just running on fairy tale stories that they told to Wall Street
to get people to invest into their company.
And so they did that for 10 years.
And when they started their company, the entire focus was on messenger RNA.
They called, you know, the name or mode RNA.
They called their company mode RNA.
And then they changed the emphasis on the different syllables to make it Moderna.
Pfizer CEO Albert Borla said during the conference in 2020 that the company's mRNA vaccine was using an antigen, quote, which is, I think, the same like the one Moderna is using, unquote.
So it's going to be a back and forth.
They kind of admitted, yeah, we're using the same thing they're doing and so forth.
Now they're going to say that, you know, because of work that was done back in the 1990s. So Robert Malone writes this Substack piece.
And the delights of the Pfizer-Moderna catfight, he says.
I'm a bit embarrassed, he says, to admit that I'm taking a perverse pleasure in watching the catfight between Pfizer-Moderna play out.
Not to gloat, but I find it validating or rather satisfying to watch these companies file lawsuits and counter lawsuits
that boil down to a schoolyard squabble over who came up with the ideas and the initial proof of concept for using mrna for
developing drugs and vaccines he says uh which i actually did and then people criticized him
and said no he didn't do that he's he's uh putting this on his uh cv and he didn't really do this
stuff companies that have exploited and unethically weaponized my early work and ideas, he said,
for enormous profit while also seeking to write me out of history.
Oh, what a tangled web we weave and force our practice to deceive.
That's what he says next.
He says, just to be clear for the haters i received a total of one u.s dollar
for my pioneering work discoveries and patents relating to my graduate research
involving mrna delivery at the salk institute and ucsd university california san diego and
between 1986 and 1990 i played no role in development of any gene therapy-based COVID vaccine.
The record shows that I was one of the early objectors
to the rushed worldwide deployment of this technology,
and I actively highlighted the now proven fact
that the spike protein expressed using this technology is a toxin.
For speaking about this, I was widely criticized,
fact-checked, and ridiculed in corporate media
and by the likes of Dr. Paul Offit.
Furthermore, I discovered and documented the profound toxicity
in both cell culture and animals
associated with the use of cationic lipids
for delivering mRNA and DNA during the 1990s,
documented and disclosed this at a conference that I organized
where I invited and first met Dr. K. Carrico about a decade
after my initial work at Salk Institute.
So what he's saying is, yes, I found this.
I discovered this.
We published it.
We talked about it.
I didn't create any vaccines or anything,
but I even talked about, you know,
and I told people how bad it was
and I didn't want to participate in it.
Didn't make any money with it
and even blew the whistle on the lipid nanoparticles,
which in and of themselves are very dangerous.
And so now these companies are fighting each other over this.
And here's why.
$136.2 billion.
U.S. government and pharmaceutical companies are investing a substantial amount to develop new mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases and cancer.
And remember how we started out the program?
We had the email from Handy talking about Emory University and how they're right next to the CDC.
Guess who is right at the center of using the mRNA stuff for every kind of treatment,
including supposedly stopping cancer.
What a joke.
What a joke.
This thing that they release inside of you
that just starts replicating
and there's no off switch to it.
It's like a cancer in and of itself.
Well, we'll use it to cure cancer.
You talk about twisting this stuff.
But this is why the patent lawsuits, $136 billion in research.
How much do you think they're going to,
what do they think they're going to make if they're willing to put $136 billion
of research into it?
And of course, a lot of that money is coming from the U.S. government.
But these people want to to both of these companies want
to own the patent or to say that it's in the public domain if it's in the public domain and
pfizer wins out because of their manufacturing capability a newly established white house
program announced on august the 23rd will be granting a total of 25 million dollars over
three years to Emory University.
So they're there, and there's other universities that are there,
but it's a really big industry.
And again, it's not just the spike protein.
It's not just that the mRNA is modifying your DNA.
We've seen that as well.
They used to say, well, that can't happen. And then in the middle of all this stuff,
they had some research from Thomas Jefferson University
that said, no, it can be used to modify the DNA.
And sometimes it does it inadvertently.
We want to look at everything as being cut and dried and perfected.
We look at the CRISPR-Cas9 genetic modification,
the editor and everything.
We think that this is some kind of a scalpel.
It's not.
It's like a chainsaw.
It messes a bunch of stuff up, as many people have compared it to that.
It can make some unintended changes.
Any technology is going to have unintended consequences.
Nothing that man makes works perfectly.
And so you're going to have some unintended consequences.
If you stop and think about the purpose of the mRNA is to
copy the DNA, they would always say,
well, it doesn't modify it, it just copies it.
What if it doesn't copy it correctly?
That's a modification, isn't it?
And then
they admitted, well, yeah, it actually can
be used to modify
the DNA. But then you
also have the lipid nanoparticles.
It's not just the spike protein that causes the disease.
The LMPs that serve as the delivery method are also toxic and pro-inflammatory.
Research from 2018, before all this stuff happened, showed even small amounts of nanoparticles
taken up by the lungs can lead to cytotoxic effects.
Ingested nanoparticles have been shown to affect lymph nodes, the liver, and the spleen.
While when injected as a drug carrier, they can pass any barrier.
And they can translocate to the brain, to ovaries, to testes.
Mainly after phagocytosis by macrophages,
which helps distribute them across the body.
The effect of the reproductive system suggests lipid nanoparticles can be
cytotoxic and can damage DNA.
So with all of this happening,
we see the vindication of people here and there that have been wrongfully terminated
some of them getting some very good compensation whether they are nurses or airline people or
university professors or doctors doctors are getting their licenses back and other things
like that we see now federal court uh rules against the fda over these anti-ivermectin posts.
And this is a lawsuit that was brought by a trio of doctors because essentially the
FDA is practicing medicine without a license.
Fauci practiced medicine without a license.
Birx did the same thing.
The CDC did the same thing.
Trump did the same thing.
These are not recommendations.
They're not choices.
They were mandates.
They were bullying people, bribing, blackmailing.
Call it anything you want to, but we know exactly what this thing was.
And so the FDA was telling people that, um, um, the doctors in this
lawsuit, so the FDA can inform, but it has no authority allowing it to
recommend consumers stop taking medicine.
That's not what the lawsuit says.
That's what the U S circuit judge Don Willett wrote in the ruling.
You can't tell people to stop taking medication that you've
approved and that's what they had approved they had approved both ACQ and ivermectin
this is just for off-label use they had not approved it specifically for that particular
thing but it had been in use for 60 years these two drugs plus. And people knew what a safety profile was.
So, you know, hey, the FDA has said it's quote unquote safe, whatever that means, because there's always adverse effects with anything.
Not saying it's like drinking water.
You got to be careful about the water as well.
But, you know, like Colonel McGregoror says they're not spending any money to clean up
palestine ohio they're going to give it all to ukraine and watch it go down the pipes the
corruption is so bad there that zielinski had to appear to be doing something about it so he just
fired one of the people that was a part of that military material that they're getting in
there but it's it's thoroughly corrupted that's there and so is our government so uh but you know
it is not harmless uh but it has a known safety profile and so always in the past physicians would
be able to make the determination that they wanted to use a drug that had been approved for use and an off-label use.
And so there was essentially the FDA was trying to practice medicine without a license like
all these health bureaucrats were.
The FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple statements discouraging people from taking
ivermectin.
We all remember the mocking lies about you're not a horse, stop taking this.
You're not a horse, you're not a cow.
Seriously, y'all, stop it.
But they also had on their website a page that that little mocking thing linked to that
said, why you should not use ivermectin to treat or to prevent COVID-19.
So these three doctors sued over that, and it looks like the judge agrees with them.
Federal law gives the government immunity against legal actions, but with some exceptions.
One exception, known as ultra-v-res, if I'm pronouncing that correctly, is when an official
acts outside of their authority. Plaintiffs challenge the acts,
plaintiffs who challenge those acts must show that the official was, quote, acting without
any authority whatever, or without any, quote, colorable basis for the exercise of authority.
Pretty much everything they did was outside of the law. I mean, you got the CDC coming in,
interjecting themselves into financial contracts,
saying you're not going to be able to foreclose
or evict people who don't pay rent.
Where'd they get that authority?
It doesn't matter what you think of the policy.
And your compassion might say, well, Trump took their job,
took their business, told them they couldn't go to work
and all the rest of the stuff.
They don't have any way to pay.
I understand that.
But where did he get the authority to do that?
And then they compound it rather than fixing the original mistake.
The government will always make a second mistake.
So then they give dictatorial power to the CDC to say,
we're going to interject ourselves under these contracts.
They should have fixed the original usurpation.
Instead, they double down with more usurpations
to the agency that is at the center of all this stuff.
So the FDA has the authority to share data and facts.
The parties agreed.
But they disagreed on whether or not the FDA can issue recommendations
on medical matters such as treatment.
So the FDA claimed that these were just informational statements.
Well, disinformation, misinformation.
They were lying, and we knew they were lying, and we already had in many countries where
they had done studies.
They said, well, here's a situation.
You've got some cases, and it's kind of popular.
Start taking the ivermectin.
It goes straight down to zero.
And then the vaccine comes in and it shoots up way higher than it ever was claimed to be.
Despite these concessions, the FDA never points to any authority that allows it to issue recommendations or to give medical advice, says the judge.
Rather, FDA argues that some posts included a hyperlink that leads to the
update. The update in turn directs consumers to, quote, talk to your health care
provider, unquote. That's the phrase that made hundreds
of billions of dollars for the cable news companies,
CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, since the 1990s.
Yeah, ask your healthcare provider.
But not all the social media links included such a link,
and even for those posts that did include a link,
the posts themselves offered advice,
not merely information, said the judge.
So it's good to see the FDA getting at least some comeuppance,
but of course they're not going to have much of a penalty involved in this.
Now there's an interesting article and it needs to be talked about.
Brian shall hobby at health impact news headline is more children under the age
of 16 died from non COVID vaccines than from COVID vaccines since December of
2020.
And he begins by talking about how, you know,
we have heavily gone into and shown what is in the VAERS database
and then other things that are not in the VAERS database,
of course, we have talked about.
You know, these kids who are now all children
have to be screened for the risk of myocarditis.
Because, you know, if they've got myocarditis and they're out there doing strenuous stuff like a kid does,
they could die of a heart attack just like an old person who's had a heart attack.
Because it's the same profile.
If you have myocarditis, and you can tell because it's got troponin in the blood,
same as if you had some kind of a heart attack issue uh then you are at the same
risk of death from a heart attack that's a person who's had a prior heart attack had
same mechanism happening here with myocarditis and pericarditis that happens
with a heart attack and the prognosis is 50 chance of death in five years. So he's right about the fact what his point in all of this is to call out the people who will focus like RFK Jr.
Brian Chalhavy has focused very heavily on RFK Jr.
Who has opposed the COVID vaccine and has opposed childhood vaccines, but says I'm not anti-vaccine.
And I agree.
And he talks about how much money children's health defense has made off of
the COVID vaccines,
because this has been the most clear cut and egregious case,
I think of the,
you know,
the way they rushed this thing through,
obviously no testing,
no concern about adverse effects or the health of people.
He says it's tripled every year, a million dollars in 2018, $3 million in 2019, 6.7 million
in 2020, the year COVID started now to to an astounding $15.9 million in 2021.
So the revenue has gone up exponentially, while RFK Jr. is saying that he is not anti-vaccine.
And again, I don't hold him to as tight a standard as Brian does, because I think what
he is saying is we've got to do the science and we got to test
these things to see if they are safe and effective. And I think he knows, as we all do, that if you
did do the science, it would show that they are not safe and effective. So it'd be the same as
being anti-vaccine, but he can try to placate the left with all this stuff and say,
well,
you know,
I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
I'm not anti-vaccine and all the rest of this stuff.
I just say I'm anti-vaccine and have been for a long time.
And like Brian shall have it.
I was anti-vaccine before the COVID stuff happened.
I'd seen the game that they ran every year with the flu vaccine and many of
these other things I'd seen the mandates that came along with Mr and i've played for many times trump in 2019 may saying
uh they got to get the shot it's going around we're going to force this on kids whose parents
have ethical and religious and medical objections we don't care you got to take it all these people
say trump isn't going to mandate this stuff one whip by hook or by crook he was going to mandate it he supported the mandate of the other stuff he wasn't the one
doing it it was states that were doing it new york california i think new jersey places like
that they were doing it but he 100 supported that because he 100 supported um uh the pharmaceutical industry, RFK Jr. had opposed those types of things.
And so, you know, I have mixed feelings about this article.
It is important that you understand, though, the case that he's making,
and that is how dangerous the standard kids' shots are.
And there was a meme.
I think I retweeted it.
I saw Rhonda Tate had it. And, uh,
it was, um, I saw it when I logged on a Twitter and it showed the number of vaccines by the number
of years. And so you got just a two or three, you know, uh, a couple of decades ago, then it expands
and now it's up to like six dozen or something crazy like that. And and and that's the real issue right there but at the same time
um i you know when he comes up with the statistics here 149 children of the age of 16 have died after
being injected with non-covered vaccines since december of 2020 112 children under the age of 16
have died after being injected with COVID vaccines since December of
2020. Look, a lot of this stuff is not reported, and it's not reported correctly. And this data,
I'm sure, does not, you know, we know, and as a matter of fact, I had a listener say, you know,
that Harvard study said that they only reported, Harvard looked at the VAERS database, and said
only 10% of these things were reported. That's what I said.
It's only 1%.
I've used this for a while and I gave the wrong number.
It's only 1% are reported.
So you can't really make any decisions about this,
especially because now there's pressure.
That was Harvard doing that study for the CDC.
And they said only 1% of these things have been reported.
Now, it's not just that it's a very cumbersome thing to do.
These people are actively discouraged and essentially threatened not to report this stuff.
It's very different with the COVID stuff.
The bottom line, though, and the gist of
this article is 100% true. And that is we must not lose sight of the fact that the standard
childhood vaccines for which Fauci got legal immunity for these drug companies. And that's
one of the reasons why they're just multiplying them. Who cares? They can't be charged for any of this stuff.
So let's ramp it up from two or three vaccines to 72
because we can make money and there's no liability.
Wouldn't you like to have a business
where there's absolutely no liability whatsoever
for anything you do or say?
No matter how much you harm other people,
you can't be held responsible
and you can
make amazing amounts of money with it.
That's what's happening right now.
And so he can't lose sight of the fact, as he points out, a lot of people have, you know,
alternative health media have made a big career in terms of pushing the COVID stuff.
He just mentions children's health defense is just one of them.
But there's a lot who have.
But it is the childhood vaccines that are still a big threat to kids.
And we need to never lose sight of that.
And that's why I'm anti-vaccine and why Brian Shulhavi is anti-vaccine because we know what these standard approved
Fauci, um, you know, protected vaccines are doing to kids, uh, on rumble nights of the storm. Well,
thank you guys. I appreciate that for the tip. Thank you very much. Good to have you back,
David. Hope you enjoyed the long weekend. I did. It was really, like I said, I needed a break badly
and, um, uh, asked for a prayer for Karen.
She had a bad fall.
She didn't break anything.
But when we took a break, she nearly had a break.
Fell down into some rocks and got scraped up and got a big swollen area on her leg.
But it's not broken.
But she's still in a great deal of pain.
So I'd appreciate it if you keep her in your prayers.
We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the David Knight show well i have a question on d live from uh fuzz meister
is rfk jr a controlled op i just take things policy by policy i can't say definitively whether
anybody is we just look at things that they do and say one by one, as I've said in the past, and I've got a lot of people who will send
me a lot of positive news about RFK Jr.
And they like him.
And as I said last week, I typically for somebody who's running as a Democrat,
I can't find anything that I agree with him on, but I agree with several
things that RFKJ says, who knows what he would do if he were president.
You know, I agreed with a lot of things that Trump said in 2016,
I thought he deserved a shot, but now we know what he did.
So end of story, as far as I'm concerned with Trump.
Uh, and, and I would say, you know, when you look at the totality of what
Trump said and then what he did, I would say that he is controlled, uh, opposition,
but I don't know about
rfkj as i said i think he's an old-style democrat uh he he believes in climate change man-made
climate change which makes him very dangerous and he also believes that government has a solution to
things and he put out the idea that we ought to the government ought to help people as the price of houses have exploded as interest rates have exploded uh that the government should help people
uh to purchase a home well again that is doubling down on the initial problems of the government
right the government is the one creating inflation the government or should say the federal reserve
which is not the government but they kowtow to the Federal Reserve anyway,
but it's the Federal Reserve that is arbitrarily raising interest rates
for their own personal agenda and that type of thing.
And so it seems to me like you need to address these root causes
rather than adding another layer of government bandages on top of things.
And so I think he is, in that that sense an old-style fdr democrat which
is dangerous as well but i do agree with him on the war and peace issues he's been very good on
that and charles linty uh loves him because of that but you know it even gave gerald a take back
when um rk jr started talking about uh you know opposing the the racial set-asides and things like that.
Supreme Court made that determination that, no, you're going to treat everybody according to merit.
And RFK Jr. had a problem with that.
That's what I'm saying.
He's an old-style Democrat.
And so I don't know about that.
I would just say, you know, if you're worried
about controlled opposition, Knights of the Storm has done a great job of putting together
a community of like-minded people. We're going to tell you, you know, tell it like it is. And so if
you want to see a program listing of a lot of different people who have a lot of different
programming, Knights of the Storm is a great place to take a look.
Jason, Angry Tiger have done a really good job of establishing a community there.
And so really do appreciate what they do and also their focus on other people because it's
bigger than just what they do.
They're trying to get the truth out, which is what we all should be trying to do.
While we're talking about money, we've got an analyst who is working for Bank of America,
Michael Hartnett.
Rather than spying on people, he's actually doing some financial analysis, historical
analysis.
He says the biggest picture segment of this latest weekly flow show the 10
year u.s treasury is on course for a third consecutive loss and that has not occurred
in the 250 year history of the u.s republic since 1787 two years before the bill of rights i mean you know and constitution um that is
um you know they're operating under the articles of confederation
and so this is a pretty amazing historical uh precedent the fact that there's been um the
treasury bills have gone for a third consecutive
loss and in those early days i mean they were still suffering under the legacy of the continental
the worthless paper money that they had at the time and so now we understand that the paper
money here is is worthless as well an interesting story as matter of fact, there's on zero hedge this weekend, uh, a, an analyst
with credit Swiss and also with a SAC capital portfolio manager, his name is
Nick Colas and he is, uh, his family came to America, uh, in the 1960s as things
were happening, you know, had Fidel Castro took over and so they got out of
a Cuba and came to America in 1960.
He said his family came to America with only $200 in a suitcase.
And as part of this bigger program, he's not just somebody who focuses on gold,
by the way, you know, just to put this in context, in this YouTube video that Zero Hedge is talking about,
he opined on topics like his three cardinal rules of investing,
how to use VIX to trade smarter, and the best way to value Tesla.
And as part of this, he also touched on gold.
And what he said was
when they escaped Castro's Cuba,
they came with only $200 in a suitcase.
After scrambling to land on their feet,
his father began buying gold coins
on business trips to Europe
when it was $35 to $37 an ounce.
Now, why does he mention that,
business trips to Europe?
Because if you remember,
as Tony Arterman has always talked about,
they had prohibited buying gold in the United States.
And so when he would travel on business trips to Europe,
that's when he would buy gold.
So he viewed gold as a long-term store of value, he said of his father.
And then in 1971, Nixon took the U.S. dollar off the gold standard
and prices began to rise.
In the late 1970s, inflation really took over as a big investment theme and the price of
gold was going up even further.
And of course, it still wasn't legal to get it in the United States, not until Gerald
Ford, right after Nixon, made it legal. In 1974, gold soared from its $35 valuation in the 1960s
to $600 an ounce by 1980.
I thought that it went up to like $800 an ounce.
That's the way I remember it.
But I don't know.
I didn't own any gold at the time, unfortunately.
But I thought it got up to $800.
While the S&P 500 has grown roughly 13 a year over the last decade when one looks outside u.s borders gold's fifth annual compounded growth
begins to look quite impressive so s&p has gone 13 a year but gold has gone up five percent a year
and it seems to me like it's a lot less of a risk
uh by the way just maybe what he was saying um it might have gotten up to um 800 after 1980 because
it still kept running up a little bit after that but the bottom line of his argument was
central banks love gold according to the world gold Council, Colas said 25% demand for gold has come from central banks,
primarily China, Russia, Turkey, India.
Why?
Well, owning gold is like owning the dollar
plus the volatility of the underlying assets, he said,
but it also offers the central bank's immunity
to sanctions and confiscation during geopolitical upheavals.
This is the key reason why I think we need to own it.
Because we've already seen, this is not something they just, that the Biden administration or
the Trump administration does to other countries.
You know, we've seen these globalists like trudeau do this to their own
people freeze their bank accounts and do all the rest of stuff we see this happening in the uk
nigel farage and many others you know it's begun with paypal you know shutting people down and
saying you know um we may in the future charge you twenty five hundred dollars for each time that we
believe that you said the wrong thing but we're're gonna close your account well they didn't do that to me in terms of the $2,500 charge but they closed my
account back in May of 2021 five months after we started this show PayPal and
Bimbo never would give me an explanation when that was brought up in the UK
because it came after the daily skeptic people they pulled it back though I
don't know how that got in there I do you put that in there? I didn't put that clause in there.
I don't know how that got in.
Seriously?
Seriously?
You got legal language in your terms of service,
and you don't know how that got in there?
Somebody just made this up at a low level?
Completely absurd.
And then, of course, when everybody stopped looking at them,
they put it back in just to prove that they were lying.
And so, meanwhile, you've got Nigel Farage and now other people getting purged out of their bank accounts.
You have Bank of America has said, well, we're going to shut down the bank account of a Christian charity because they're sending money to Uganda.
Really?
What is it about Uganda?
Well, Uganda's passed these laws making homosexuality illegal.
And if you do homosexual rape of a minor, you can get the death penalty.
So Bank of America has determined that you can't send money to Uganda because of the government's policy.
You can't, a Christian charity that's set up to give money to poor people in Uganda,
it's going to be, going to lose their bank account.
See, they're making these determinations about who gets to keep a bank account.
So these types of sanctions and confiscations that are,
what they're angling for with the central bank digital currency
and all the rest of these types of controls,
even if they don't have central bank digital currency,
they're already doing this through their surrogates, the big banks.
The big banks are going to do what the government wants because the government is their customer.
You are not their customer.
It's just like social media and all the rest of it.
They want to please the government and they don't care what you want.
NASCAR doesn't care what you want.
They're going to shove ESG down your throat and And on and on. You know, whether you're
talking about Bud Light or the rest of it. They want to please the government.
Same thing is true of the car companies. If they please the government, they're going
to be one of the few companies that's going to be allowed to exist.
This is kind of crony capitalism, kind of economic fascism
that you see in China, and it's coming to our country as well.
So they don't care what you want.
You're not their customer.
The government is their customer for their long-term survival.
And so for those reasons, you need to be investing in gold as a secondary thing
so they can't confiscate it, so they can't sanction you.
We're pretty bullish on gold for the
next five to ten years he said uh have good underlying demand good incremental demand from
central banks as well but gold is just natural money the fiat stuff is fake michael maheri
gold is nature's money it absolutely is by the way the way, DavidKnight.Gold is what Tony has set up to take you to Wise Wolf Gold.
Tony will sell you gold or silver and any denomination.
Of course, if you want to set up on a regular savings plan, he's got that as well.
His Wolf Pack, you can just do it without thinking about it and gradually accumulate stuff.
It's just kind of a savings plan.
Kind of the same type of thing
this guy's father did cola's father did when he escaped from um from uh cuba with only 200
and then he became very wealthy because he gradually started saving money and putting it
into something that was absolutely real we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show
all right welcome back let's talk a little bit about some of the entertainment stuff that happened over the weekend.
It truly was amazing.
We saw Oliver Anthony, and I forget what his actual name is.
That's his stage name.
That's fine.
A lot of people have stage names.
You know, John Wayne's first name was Marion.
Can't understand why he would change it.
You know, that was pretty much a standard
thing uh but um he went on with um Joe Rogan and the guy who wrote uh and sang Richmond North of
Richmond and um uh he as Variety said he was very different from the video that he put up where he was saying, look, the Republicans
asked me if they could play an excerpt of that song for the debate. I said, yeah, but I didn't really like the way
they used it because there was no sense that I was talking about them.
And the only person who really
responded to that question was DeSantis, and he made it about
Biden. He goes, goes no i'm not republican
or democrat and they're all doing the same thing to a people and uh so he uh got in a back and
forth with joe rogan and i think one of the things that was very interesting about it was the fact
that he brought up porn to joe rogan and alcohol and i want you to hear what Joe Rogan said in response.
In that business.
I believe it's one third of internet traffic worldwide
or something bonkers like that.
Isn't it something like that?
It should be more.
Let's find out what it is.
What's the percentage?
And everybody's like,
I don't know where it's coming from.
It's not me.
I've never even seen one of these films.
That stuff's terrible for people. It's not me. I've never even seen one of these films. That stuff's terrible for people.
It's terrible for some people.
I gave that up.
I think it's like Adderall.
Some people can handle it.
That is one thing I had to give up.
Yeah, because it's, I don't know,
it does disconnect you from reality in many ways.
And I think a lot of the weird perversion we see like coming out sort of like now at this
point you read about,
I mean,
I even referenced some of it in the song of course,
but you read about like a lot of the weird things that people are doing that
maybe wouldn't have been accepted a hundred years ago.
I think people go down these rabbit holes with porn and they start off.
It's a,
they start off with the video with the milkman.
And by the end of it,
it's like,
where did I end?
I don't know.
People have to keep, it's almost like a drug people have to keep chasing that thrill and
it takes them down very destructive rabbit holes you know if you will so it definitely came for
some people i have no issue with anybody watching it but i do hate the i hate to read about some of
the things that it does to people it affects you know ruins marriages and that kind of thing it's
like i don't know but i think a lot of things ruin people I do I think they also should be legal like or yeah alcohol ruins people
I like the fact that bars are legal shit. I own a bar
Alcohol is legal. I like it. It's good. It's not good for everybody though
Some people drink alcohol and they lose their fucking mind and it's not good for them
Whether it's genetically or whatever it is, they't have a drink i like a drink yeah you know and i i support your right to do whatever
you want like you know i think if cocaine was legal the same amount of people would probably
do it and it would be real you'd get pure cocaine it'd probably better we'd probably have better music yeah well there you go it seems to me like you know um you know porn some people can't handle it
adderall some people can't handle it alcohol some people can't handle it but you know joe can handle
it all and of course that's the same thing that satan says to you isn't it well you know some people can't
handle those things but you can just a little bit just a taste you know it's all it takes
i remember when i grew up um grew up in a teetotaling family and uh i would say well
first the man takes a drink then the drink takes a drink then the drink takes a man but the issue there is uh you know and
again good for oliver anthony for having the guts to tell the truth of how it's like a drug it's
like an addiction all of these things adderall alcohol porn these are all addictions these are
all things that were promised freedom but they ens enslave you. You become a slave to these things.
You become a slave to the lusts of this stuff, the sin.
You become a slave to that sin, that lust.
And yeah, some people can handle it, he says.
Well, you know, the way to approach that is to say, you know, look, alcohol was prohibited prohibited they had enough respect for the constitution to
do it legally they had a constitutional amendment the 18th to make it illegal 21st to make it legal
again we don't respect the constitution and we also understand this is a spiritual problem a
medical problem it's not a law enforcement problem and by trying to use a hammer on a screw we have made this a lot worse
and we got one tool that we use for everything and that is force from the government
and this is that's not the right solution to this problem you don't have to deny that it's a problem
you have to say that this tool that we're using is
not the appropriate tool and so i give him credit you know he shies away from challenging rogan and
i understand that you know he was saying um in this interview uh i was so shy i couldn't do a
concert like the one i don't know what 15 20000 people or something he had show up at that concert after
his song went big. He said, I didn't have the kind of confidence where I could do something like that
before he became a Christian. And he did, because that kind of turned him away, I guess, from
looking at himself. I don't know why you know what what changed but you know he
said that was something that changed about it but I understand that you know
he may still shy away from going head-to-head with Joe Rogan a lot of
people would be you know concerned about that but Joe Rogan pushes a lot of stuff
a lot of garbage to people he pushes hallucinogenic mushrooms to people as well.
You don't want to take any advice from Joe Rogan, quite frankly.
What Oliver Anthony said, it's almost like a drug.
People keep chasing that thrill,
takes them down destructive rabbit holes,
ruins marriages, ruins people,
gets them focused on other,
gets them where they can't relate to people as a real person, in a sense.
And so he also talked about how he went on a run with SSRIs,
and the side effects were more powerful than any of the benefits.
As far as I could tell, he did not talk about the murder-suicide aspects of SSRIs, but just in general, the idea that we would
seek to try to address all of our problems with a pill, rather than looking at some of
the underlying issues.
And he talked about a relative who eats anything that he wants, and even though he's got high
blood pressure and diabetes,
it doesn't affect his behavior.
He just takes more drugs from the pharmaceutical companies.
So he seems like he's got his head on straight with this.
But,
you know,
when you look at,
um,
also as part of the interview,
it went on for like two hours,
evidently.
And at one point,
uh,
he read,
uh,
Proverbs to, um,verbs to Joe Rogan.
And this I saw as a comment because one of the people that's in the band,
Christian rock band, Skillet, John Cooper, as you know who that is, right? He responded to this because as Oliver Anthony read Proverbs to Joe Rogan,
Joe Rogan's response was, that's pretty effing profound, right?
That's Joe Rogan's response to everything, right?
John Cooper says, well well i wouldn't exactly put
it like that but it is profound because when we read the bible it's not just words that some really
super old people wrote it's words that were breathed out by god himself instructions for
how to live from god how to love your neighbor how to treat people who do not treat you well, how to treat your wife, how to parent your kids,
and how to work hard.
And the Bible is the word of life, said John Cooper.
He's absolutely right.
He then argued that the progressive worldview is always looking for its answers somewhere
in the future, or the here and now, right?
We're progressing toward it, rather than looking backward toward wisdom.
It believes a progressive view
that people that came before us were retrograde.
They're old.
They didn't know what they were doing.
As a matter of fact,
I think one of the most amazing experiences
I had with somebody over this particular issue
was as a friend of Karen, her her twin brother from high school came down
to visit us we were living in north carolina and i said something um somehow um you know
i don't know i don't know why somebody would interject politics into a discussion like that
maybe it was me i can't help it uh but uh i said something about Thomas Jefferson I didn't get
real political right wasn't left right but it was Thomas Jefferson and his response was
Jefferson didn't know anything he didn't wouldn't even be able to drive a car today
it's like what I was speechless at the stupidity of that remark.
You know, it was JFK addressing a group of scientists,
I think award-winning scientists like Nobel Prize winners and that type of thing.
He says, this is the most brainpower there's been in the White House
since Thomas Jefferson dined alone.
It's like, you think that's your standard?
You know, being able to drive a car?
Has he been on the roads?
Has he noticed what the low qualifications are
for people being able to have a driver's permit
or to be on the road?
I mean, that, again, it's ridiculous.
But people think that way.
They look at this and they say, well, we don ridiculous. But people think that way.
They look at this and they say, well, we don't want to hear from these people.
We want to reject the past.
There's no reason for the warning labels that we have on things.
You know, that sign that says, be careful, don't go down this path.
It could be because it just goes straight off the ledge.
We don't care about these signs.
It's put there by somebody before us.
We don't care.
We don't want to look at any of the warning signs.
We don't want to look at any of the experience of other people.
We're going to figure it all out ourselves because we're so much smarter than they are.
Because see, I've got a computer in my pocket.
My computer in your pocket is making you dumber, not smarter.
But while we're talking about the porn stuff,
this also broke over the weekend.
And that is,
um,
uh,
details published by the BBC in a,
in a group that was,
uh,
uh,
this is also part of a documentary that they're doing on Andrew Tate.
They got encrypted telegram messages sent over a period of about a year,
March,
2019 to April,
2020,
45 potential trafficking victims could be identified.
And I think one of the things that was truly amazing,
you know, when we look at this, it's like,
yes, Oliver Anthony was right.
There are, you know, porn use is awful for people.
But, you know, how the porn is made,
destroying lives on both sides
of this financial transaction,
quite frankly.
Members of Andrew Tate's
War Room group
discussed techniques
on how to groom women
into online sex,
including by using violence
and incrementally isolating them
from their friends and family.
And I talk about this because it's got a lot of parallels to what our government schools are doing to our kids, quite frankly.
You cut them off from their support.
You cut them off from their family and that type of thing, right?
Don't tell the parents.
Classic grooming. And in the case of Tate's War Room, the War Room is this thing that you pay $8,000
a year. $8,000 a year to join. And you have access to, quote, thousands of professionals
from around the world who encourage personal responsibility and accountability, the importance
of taking ownership of your choices and actions.
And yet, when they saw these leaked emails
where they were talking about how to groom women into sex work
through their PhD course, they call that the Pimpin' Hose degree,
the group's leading generals allegedly teach members
how to seduce women emotionally manipulate
them and pressure them into doing pornography while taking the majority of the money that they
make like a pimp why is this guy celebrated by tucker carlson alex jones and other people like
that this is the right side.
We're going to look at the left side here coming up out of Hollywood here.
But one guy out of Chicago, his name is Miles Sonkin, used the alias Iggy Simmelweis.
And he described a series, quote, series of gradual steps to remove her entire support structure from her life.
Isolate them.
This is classic grooming.
This is what is being done, by the way, to your kids in school,
if you put them in a government school,
and they start grooming them for this transgender stuff.
So they isolate them, remove them from their entire support structure, then we punish her for a transgression, real or imagined.
This is also what is done in the schools.
Do you use their pronouns?
Do you use their own pronouns?
And on and on, all these imaginary transgressions.
You triggered somebody with the language that you used or whatever.
Beating these people into submission, isolating them from their parents and their family and their friends.
Leaving her family's home, apartment, town, or country.
And then eventually we turn her into getting us girls, you know,
like Jeffrey Epstein did with Maxine Giswold, you know, gets her to recruit the girls.
Takes their guard down because this is another woman.
This isn't just a guy.
And then we escalate, escalate, escalate, he says.
Isolating her from their family or friends is the kindest thing you can do for her
if you are taking responsibility for having the sole authority over her.
Does this sound like a K-12 teacher?
I'm isolating these kids from the parents for their own protection.
I know what's best for this kid, and I'm going to do a better job of this.
It's what the gay men's choir in San Francisco was singing about.
Yes, you're right.
We are coming for your kids, and we're going to make them better than you would ever make
them because we know what they really need right this is the classic grooming and uh so uh you know when
when you look at how this thing is shaking out there's really not a whole lot of difference
between the left and right it's just kind of what they focus on a spokesperson uh responded to this bbc report in the documentary
by saying it's quote another brazen attempt to present a one-sided unverified allegations
against him well i don't really know um that's a non-response, I guess. Really? Don't you want to respond to those things that are being done
and the testimony of a couple of women that talked to these people as well
as the text messages that they got?
What is your explanation for that?
Oh, well, you're just like Fauci.
That ain't the whole story here.
There's some other stuff.
In the documentary, you meet a follower who says that he won't believe the allegations against Tate until he admits to them himself.
Why do you think he has such power over these young men?
Asked the BBC to this documentary people.
I said, well, people tend to look at Andrew Tate as a political thing.
But it's actually closer to a spiritual thing now we've moved
from the LGBT type of grooming of kids in schools to what you see happening
with Trump isn't it well you know Tate is is good because he likes Trump and it
doesn't really matter what he does to women. They deserve that anyway, right? As long as they're adults, you can do anything you want to to people, right?
We draw the line, we conservatives draw the line at kids, right?
But women are fair game.
Is that really it?
He says, actually closer to a spiritual thing,
these people see Andrew Tate as Messiah-like figure who has saved
them from the depths of whatever insecurity they have, and he's their key to happiness and to
saving society. Just like Trump, the Messiah-like figure of Trump and his media hanger-ons, right, who promote him, that type of thing.
Yeah, that's the way we get into this situation.
You posit that Iggy Simmelweis, a war room general,
might actually be the mastermind behind this whole operation?
I said, yeah, and what kind of a person, they said,
creates an entire society of men and then encourages them to traffic women and send images back of those trafficked women?
Is it all just some grand operatic fetish of Iggy's?
And they said, well, yeah, he leaves all these breadcrumbs about where he's coming from.
He makes references on his Twitter and in messages about a book called The Scarlet Citadel by Robert Howard.
In that book, there's a wizard who traffics screaming girl slaves and wears a ring identical to the one that Iggy gets his war room members to wear.
There has to be a degree of hubris for him to lace his tweets with these subtle references to him being the gatekeeper of the Scarlet Citadel.
I'm sure in some ways that he wants people to work it out because he's probably quite impressed with what he thinks he's achieved.
Iggy is the old school artist nerd who is into dungeons and dragons and fantasies, and he fancies himself as a dark wizard.
You know, it has a lot of impact on a lot of people.
You know, we look at, there was a story last week
about a young teenage boy, not graduated from high school yet,
and he is on his phone, and he gets this text message
of some girl that he met online, he thought.
And she sends him, you know,
they get real flirty.
She sends him some pictures of herself,
nude and compromised positions,
and gets him to respond the same way.
Turns out it's not a woman at all.
It was this Nigerian group of people,
and then they use that to blackmail him
they said now you're going to do what we tell you to do or we're going to show those initial pictures to all these people that we've pulled your contact list off of your phone including
your mother and they couldn't figure out why their young son got the dad's gun and shot himself.
It took him several months to figure that out.
You know,
when we look at what is happening with this and the way they're playing with people's lives,
it just disgusts me to see this kind of stuff like Andrew Tate and what we're
going to be talking about here with Hollywood.
Um,
and I said,
like Trump,
you know,
Tate's fans have become even more
invested in loyal to him and more antagonistic of anybody who reports on
what he does, you know, they circle the wagons, you know, can't believe this
guy would ever do anything wrong.
Right.
Cause we've invested in him.
We know that he has the answers to life.
No, he doesn't.
The Bible has the answers to life. Not Andrew
Tate. It doesn't cost
$8,000 a year.
You get your pew Bible for
free.
Most churches will hand it to you
if you walk in.
It's been quite shocking
to see how they've gone from people who supported
someone on the internet to people who
literally believe this man is a Messiahiah who's going to save civilization and it's the same reason you got
people like tucker and alex supporting andrew tate just like they do trump they want uh the the
the manga people is a big audience it's a mega audience and they can get mega bucks for pushing this stuff
and he is part of that uh they said has tate himself changed during this time
well he said his marketing team has intentionally tried to portray him as more of a religious man.
Isn't that amazing?
And that is something else that we have seen, isn't it?
As things get darker and darker for these people,
you start seeing more and more God talk from them, don't you?
These alternative media people, like Alex and others.
And then let's take a look at what hollywood is doing this new uh film that has previewed in the venice film festival and again these film festivals especially venice
you know con film festivals the same way but especially in venice they have just the most
repulsive stuff even these people who are film critics and they've seen everything and
movie stars have seen everything they go to these things and yeah they're shown these pictures and
they come out vomiting i mean literally vomiting from some of these pictures they've had the last
few years and uh this they love this picture this is um from a greek director and it involves emma stone they refer to it
brightbart news a feminist frankenstein emma stone wows venice as a sex mad reanimated corpse
with an infant's brain this is the pedo sex fantasies of the leftists in Hollywood, and it combines so many different things.
Combines abortion.
It combines pedophilia.
It combines feminism and gender wars, which is what they really love about it.
But it also has those other things that you tick off on there as well.
Emma Stone stars as a sexually voracious, reanimated corpse with a mind of a child.
You see?
And as I was saying before about Uganda, you know, the death penalty that they give is,
they call it aggravated homosexuality.
And people say, well, what is aggravated homosexual? Now, that is, you know, homosexual rape of a child or of somebody who's mentally impaired.
And that's the way that Emma Stone is portrayed in this movie, Poor Things.
As a childlike mind, you know, she, you can see in the trailer, she throws herself off of a cliff. She is found by this mad scientist who then reanimates her,
but he uses the brain of her unborn child and puts that in her.
So she's born with a mind of a child, but the adult body of a woman.
And then they make it all about sex
because this is their pedophile fantasy uh finding somebody who's mentally impaired or finding a
child and um you know uh this virginal type of thing that they do this is part of their sickness and the
film critics love it they gave it 100% 100% course audiences haven't seen it I
think the audiences are going to have a different opinion of this I hope so I
hope we haven't gotten to the point of the film critics out there it features
some of the most explicit sex ever seen in an A-list Hollywood film,
as her naive character discovers and very much enjoys her sexuality. The director says the
character has no shame, and Emma had to have no shame about her body, her nudity, or engaging in
those scenes. Shameless. Shameless. That pretty much describes Hollywood.
She understood it right away.
And so then it gets into the feminist aspect of it.
So that's the pedophilia aspect of it.
The molester mindset that people can watch this and identify with.
Then the film skewers the way men try and fail to control
the innocent bella that's her name triggering bursts of spontaneous applause and riotous
laughter from the audience in venice again um you know you feed this um you you turn this around
and now the woman who eventually was portrayed as a victim now becomes the dominant one in all of
this they love that poor things is an early favorite among 23 movies competing for the top
prize to be awarded on september the 9th at this venice festival you know i remember when it was
the con film festival in 2021 and um you had these people show up and they were very angry about the fact
that they had to take a covid test and for these celebrities they would not submit them to the
indignity of having um um you know a swab ramrodded up their nose to their brain instead they had them
spit into a container,
and they thought that was disgusting.
And I said at the time, you think that's disgusting.
You should see what they're playing inside the movie theater.
That'll make you want to throw up.
But, you know, and Macron said, well, you know,
we're going to have to have a vaccine passport in two months.
You're going to need to have a vaccine passport
in order to travel anywhere.
But they had delayed it because they wanted to be able to have the con film festival you know
these people get to do whatever they wish and they get a pass for everything because
really what they are doing in terms of the content that they're putting out
this is high level propaganda the highest level of propaganda. The spiritual corruption propaganda.
And it's amazing to hear Tucker Carlson talk about how,
oh yeah, we've got all these people.
They work for the CIA and all these people are disinformation agents.
It's like his dad worked for Voice of America,
CIA propaganda arm, all of his life, practically.
And Tucker wanted to be in the CIA.
I think probably he is serving them.
But anyway, it said an incredible new record, says Digital Traffic.
They said a massive 100% on Rotten Tomatoes because, because again only film critics have seen it uh probably i didn't look on rotten tomatoes to see how many people you know was it five people
rated it got 100 uh but again no audiences have seen this yet mark ruffalo is also in it
as well as william defoe who plays the mad scientist Mark Ruffalo, is the suitor of hers.
But again, what's not to like about this?
We got suicide.
We got abortion.
We got baby parts being repurposed like Fauci in the NIH.
We've got sex with a mentally impaired childlike person.
We have pornography.
We have feminist gender wars wars what's not to love
about this film i mean it perfectly embodies everything that we should all like and if we watch
this garbage coming out of hollywood yeah we'll get drawn into that like oliver anthony said
you're getting really weird stuff look at the the films. Look at how weird they've got.
Because you've always got to do something else to offend people.
Cannibalism, this type of stuff.
You've always got to get the next shock people.
You've got to shock people.
We get dulled to these ordinary things.
And then we've got to have the next thing.
And then we get dulled to that. We've got to have the next thing. And then we get dulled to that.
We've got to have the next bigger fix.
It is very much like drug addiction.
Always looking for that next thrill.
A woman says her daughter was sex trafficked
after the school hid her gender transition
and removed her from the family.
See how this all works?
Just like what Andrew Tate does.
Michelle Blair, biological grandmother and adoptive mother of a 16-year-old girl, Sage, filed a lawsuit. She said Sage has
a history of mental health issues and early childhood trauma. She then got under the control and manipulation of some school employees in Virginia.
They started changing her name and pronouns, telling her to use the boys' bathroom.
I mean, isn't this like Poor Things, the movie?
This is real life.
She was being verbally, physically, sexually
harassed, all constant threats of rape
from the male students. Despite this,
the school still encouraged her
to use the boys' bathroom.
Among the defendants named in the lawsuit
are two counselors
and the Maryland public defender.
According to the lawsuit,
these two counselors played a key
role in deliberately concealing Sage's transition, which they were pushing, while engaging in inappropriate psychotherapy methods to facilitate Sage's belief that she was a boy.
This is something that is also very, very common there was um so i said uh you know when i put together um some of the music i get
samples from various sources one of them that i liked a lot was uh spitfire libraries out of the
uk and one of the co-founders of that company was pushed out after he got on and said you got to be
careful about what they're doing to kids now he says says, this is coming to your doorstep. And if you've got a child with autism, he said,
it's already on your doorstep.
Because you see, they're going to, just like the movie,
poor things, they're going to go to those who have a childlike innocence.
And they're going to manipulate them.
They're going to separate them from the family and all the rest.
And for telling the truth about that,
he was kicked out of the company that he co-founded.
Sage was kidnapped, drugged, and raped by an adult male who later drove her to Washington,
where she was left with two brothers who drugged and raped her again before driving her to
Maryland, where she was then left with a registered sex offender
who kept her in a locked room only to be trafficked to other men.
Maybe these guys got the pimpin' ho degrees from Andrew Tate, you think?
Certainly sounds like it.
The law enforcement rescued her on September 2nd, 2021.
The adoptive mother, the biological grandmother of hers,
was not allowed to take her home because the public defender,
and they have a Freudian slip in this article,
they call this person the public offender.
Yeah, that's what this person was.
And it's so much a defender.
The public defender alleged that there was neglect at home and proved it. They had the child on Zoom and in the courtroom.
She came up on the big Zoom screen.
She said, I called her name and I said, I love you, Sage.
And she replied, I love you, Nana.
And that was it.
The public defender shut down the Zoom and convinced the judge that I was abusive because they didn't call her by her boy name.
And the judge went along with that.
And then with that public defenders and the assistance of these two counselors in school, they convinced the judge to put the child in the custody
of the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services,
where she was housed with high-risk adolescent males.
Males.
But this child, who had been through all this kidnapping and rape and everything,
puts the kid in there with a bunch of males,
who then again sexually assaulted her.
A month later, she escaped, fled to Texas
to meet somebody she'd met online,
who she believed was 16,
but the person turned out to be another sex trafficker.
By this time, Texas authorities were able to intervene,
and then the ones in Texas gave her back to her mother,
unlike the ones in Maryland.
And she has now been there after having been away from home for over a year.
And so the woman who is now suing these people said,
all this could have been avoided if the school had informed me of what was going on instead of keeping me in the dark
sage would not have now a lifetime complex of PTSD diagnosis that she'll
struggle with for the rest of her life she's had a history of mental health
issues from early childhood trauma and that was exploited by these school
counselors and by these people who trafficked her and raped her.
This is the way this operates.
And so to kind of close this out, CNN says that it is anti-gay to prosecute men having sex with 12-year-olds.
CNN says it's anti-gay to prosecute them.
And of course, that's what I talked about earlier.
Bank of America, we're not going to let this, we're going to shut down the account of this
Christian charity because they're sending some money to Uganda.
And Uganda has these new laws.
CNN writes, this act that was signed into law in May outlaws gay marriage in Uganda,
punishes same-sex acts with life imprisonment.
It has been decades since Uganda last carried out an execution, but its longtime president
had threatened in 2018 to resume state assent for capital punishment.
It seeks to criminalize what is often consensual conduct between adults, but that is not what
this death penalty is about.
And that's not what these particular cases are.
A man who was arrested in Soroti is the second person to be charged with a capital offense in Uganda since the law passed in May.
Another man was charged with aggregated homosexuality last month in eastern Uganda
for allegedly performing a sexual act with a child age 12 of the same sex.
And this is reported by CNN, but they present this as an anti-gay law.
The article says that one man was charged with a sexual act with a child age 12 of the same sex.
The other man charged was performing unlawful sexual intercourse with a man aged 41 who had a disability. And yet, the banks, Bank of America, and our government, and CNN, and Hollywood, A-list
stars, want you to see this portrayed as an empowering thing.
Because Emma Stone is doing it.
We'll be right back. as an empowering thing, because Emma Stone is doing it.
We'll be right back. Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. Music
And now, The David Knight Show. and now the david nut show
travis wrote to me he said the comedian sam hyde who always gets reported as a mass shooter and
other things um and uh that's a fake ted talk called the 2070 paradigm shift one joke he made in it was
by then we would have quote state enforced homosexuality travis says we got there a bit
early didn't we yeah yeah state and corporate enforced homosexuality. That's bottom line.
Well, I think it's necessary for us to look at this dark stuff.
We can't run from it.
We have to know what we're up against.
We also have to understand, Rebel News put together a short documentary.
I'm not going to play it all because it's about 20 minutes long,
but I would recommend that you go to Rebel news and take a look at pastor tim stevens i'm talking about the fact he's now been acquitted
of uh he was arrested uh at least twice just like pastor arthur palowski and uh james coats and
others for violating these uh arbitrary uh rules that were out there. And he has now beaten these charges on a technicality,
the fundamental principle, however, they have held
by letting him off on a technicality.
But I saw this, and I retweeted it yesterday on my Twitter feed.
And I said, you know, we have a dying world.
It is so hungry what authentic Christians like this pastor have.
What does he have?
He's got courage.
He's got integrity.
He's got convictions.
And, you know, that is what we don't see.
And, of course, those are just fringe benefits, frankly.
You know, what he has that he didn't earn
is a gift of Christ.
And so liberty, as I said,
is just a fringe benefit of this stuff.
A civil society is just a fringe benefit of this.
You know, we don't want to pursue those things
and miss the core thing that gives us that
and even gives us peace in difficult circumstances because he was arrested in front of
his family uh he spent quite a bit of time in jail i think he was in for a couple of months
you know weeks two brutal arrests spending weeks behind bars and um he kept his his church open,
church doors open during COVID-19.
James Coates was also arrested.
One of the things that he said in the final address to his congregation, final sermon
before they hauled him off to jail,
he said, I wish I had studied history more,
especially church history of this.
And he says, i think we need to
focus on that a bit more in the future um and uh this is what it looks like when they came and
arrested him outside the church with all of his young family there and again how do these police
officers how do they sleep at night how are they going at night? How are they going to be remembered?
What are they going to tell their children and their grandchildren that they did during the
COVID wars? That's different. Injustice! Injustice! Yeah, I think what a lot of Canadians realized
in the last few years is that our most fundamental freedoms actually come second place in our Constitution, in our Charter.
Nothing sharp, nothing basically at all in your pockets,
nothing we need to worry about.
Bye, Daddy!
There's this kid watching him being taken away
for the crime of having a church.
And there's that cop with a mask on his face,
ashamed of himself. Also, I know other regions in the country, like in Ontario, for the crime of having a church. And there's that cop with a mask on his face. So the judge here.
Shamed of himself.
Also, I know other regions in the country, like in Ontario,
agreed that our fundamental freedoms to assemble, to gather, to worship,
that those were, in fact, they were impinged.
They were violated by the government.
But, of course, that first section of our charter says,
you know, the government can suppress our freedoms
if it's demonstrably justified. And there is no burden of proof upon Dina Hinshaw or anybody else
to justify their decisions. And so that's really what is a shame about all of this is
it's the admission that your rights were violated. However, the government can do that.
Yeah, that's from Rebel News.
Excellent documentary, and it goes on for quite some time after that.
As a matter of fact, he said so many people watched the video.
So many people saw Pastor Tim's unshakable convictions and his authentic Christian witness
that as with many churches that resisted the lockdown, he saw attendance
at the church that he had there skyrocket precisely as authorities tried to shut him
down because people are trying to look for somebody that really believes what they have
to say.
And his witness, remember, when we talk about the term martyr, that's been co-opted by Muslim terrorists who do suicide bombings.
But the only thing that that has in common with the martyrs of Christendom is death.
Because the martyr was Greek word for witness. and the Christian martyrs were people who would, under penalty of death,
refuse to denounce or to deny what they had seen firsthand.
And they refused to, that was the first group of martyrs that happened.
And then, of course, after that, others who did not kill somebody,
but they would die rather than recounting what they had witnessed or what they had known or what they had experienced.
The recent acquittal of all remaining charges against him and his church, the ruling determined that the health orders under which Tim Stevens had been charged were not valid.
And that based on a technicality, the Public Health Act had been breached.
And that's what is also disappointing about this.
The fact that this is not upholding the fact that Canadians have rights.
They have a charter of rights.
And yet, as you heard him say, the charter of rights, it says at the top,
well, these can be abridged if it's inconvenient.
Well, if you can take that away if it's inconvenient,
and if it's more expedient for you to just ignore them, they don't exist.
And unfortunately, the judge refused to speak on that central issue.
Instead, they said, well, on a technicality, a legal technicality, we're going to let you go. But, you know, we're going to let this principle stand.
And that's really where we are right now.
We've got to understand that this usurpation, this tyrannical usurpation of power
by every political party, you know, by Republicans and Democrats,
both in the United States, but by every political party and every country,
all following the global agenda.
You don't think we have global governance?
Where were you in 2020?
That was global governance demonstrated to us.
They were all marching in lockstep,
all of them saying, well, in two months we're going to do,
here's what I told you I was going to do two months ago.
Now in two months we're going to do this next thing.
They're not responding to any epidemic.
There was no epidemic. Nobody was dying when Trump locked us down. All of this was following the orders
as we saw implemented in China first, but just following the orders
of the UN and the CIA that have been practicing these germ games
for 20 years. So he shared at this point the fact that
the ruling acknowledged that
fundamental rights were
trampled, but that it
was apparently
acceptable because of
the so-called pandemic.
He says he'll be
taking legal action
against those who
unlawfully imprisoned
him as his first
arrest resulted from
an injunction that
did not apply to him
in addition to being
arrested twice and
imprisoned without basis.
And he'll be represented in Canada by an organization called the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms.
I talked to them when they were defending James Coates.
And it was a good organization there.
And the next person up for trial in Canada isra litch who uh took the lead role in the
freedom convoy she is set to uh go to court this month to see what happens there uh it truly is
amazing but it is instructional for us we know what is coming and uh we also know that um again
don't be afraid to stand up for what you believe.
It may not work out that you're going to win in the end, and it may not work out that you're going to be made whole,
but you want to not compromise on these fundamental issues.
There's going to be people who stand up for this stuff no matter what happens
that are going to be the heroes of the future.
Just as we had heroes of the past, people like William Penn, who stood up for what they believed and were in prison for it.
And the jury foreman and the number two guy in the jury who were imprisoned after they let William Penn go, they were thrown in jail by the judge who was angry about that because they
nullified the law that they believed was wrong.
And the penalty that they believed was wrong.
They nullified that.
So the judge threw them in jail.
William Bushnell was the foreman of the jury.
And so I'm just going to let you stay in jail.
And so then they got a lawyer and the lawyer said,
what body of law did they violate again?
You know,
same as this,
what law was violated here?
You're the one who violated the law, judge.
So that established both habeas corpus
and jury nullification.
People have gone to jail.
People have died for these values.
And we have a society that's gotten so soft,
people cave over pronouns. A top psychiatrist says go back to
church because loneliness is now a major u.s health threat this is amazing this is actually
something not only a psychologist but it was also biden's surgeon general i would have never thought
that vivek murthy would have talked about this.
He says he suffered loneliness as a child and again as an adult,
said Murthy, Biden's Surgeon General.
He said it was my wife Alice who stepped in and said,
hey, I'm worried about you because you're not reaching out to people.
You're not socializing with your friends.
He said about half of adults are struggling with loneliness and even greater numbers of children
are this can be surprising given the fact that many young people are frequently connecting with
their peers online but that's no substitute for in person it really isn't and that's why they're
talking about this they said this is a problem that is building because people don't want to,
it was already a big trend.
And of course they accelerated this with all the lockdown with the COVID nonsense.
It was already a trend that people were more interested in meeting people
online rather than face to face.
Um, mental health experts like psychiatrist Daniel Amen,
Amen is his name,
Amen says go back to church.
They believe social media can prove to be addicting
and therefore predict the problem will only get worse.
I actually believe we're on the beginning of a tidal wave
of brain and mental health problems in young people,
and it's because we're more disconnected than ever before.
Disconnected from our own families because when people are together,
their faces are buried in their gadgets, he said.
And so the solution, he says, is to maximize in-person interactions.
Look, I understand when you look at zoom church and you can you know
go around and you can find teachers that you like and that type of thing but you know it isn't you
know what you take away from it as much as it is what you put in and i we're guilty of this as
anybody you know in terms of because i'm so busy not investing time person to person with other people.
And that is especially true in a church situation.
You know, a lot of people who are there and they need help,
and that's really the way that you need to look at it.
It's not even as the perspective of this thing is like,
well, you need human companionship, so this is for you.
It's for your good.
See, everything is about what's good for me. You know i like the music do i like the the teaching do i um do i
like the people there no as c.s lewis says this lady over here she's got squeaky boots and you
know as he's sitting in the church view he's going through and he's like oh that person there look at
how they're dressed and all this you know you're nitpicking all these different things or at least it's being fed to you that way and um and yet you know it's um
a big part of that for our own good is to give of ourselves more than we take away and that's
a big part of what is you know it's not just the isolation and the loneliness but the fact that you
know we're looking at how am i to, what's in it for me?
What am I going to get out of this thing?
Why would I bother to go there?
Well, you go there, hopefully, to serve other people.
Jurors are now being removed because they're Christians.
This happened in Missouri, and the Attorney General there, Andrew Bailey, has asked the Supreme Court to intervene in a case
where people were thrown out simply because they were Christians.
This is not really the first time we've seen this type of thing, but it is an escalating
trend when Kermit Gosnell, the guy who was eventually convicted for killing two full-term
babies and causing the death of a woman who went there for an abortion because of the
shoddy condition of his clinic and the fact that after she started hemorrhaging uh the hallways
have dilapidated and they couldn't get any um gurneys down the hallways to get her out in time
so they have said in this and in that particular case the reason i brought that up was in that
particular case they said in order for you to be a juror, you have to believe in abortion.
That is a good thing.
It should be legal and that type of thing.
It's not going to be a trial about abortion.
This is going to be about Kermit Gosnell.
And so they said jurors can be excluded, of course, if their religious views, in fact,
make them biased, just like jurors can be excluded if their race
or sex in fact makes them biased,
says the petition from Missouri
Attorney General. But this
court's precedents make clear that courts cannot
assume, based on stereotypes about race
or sex, that a person will be
biased. The same thing could be true of religion.
He said
we could have a situation where you could categorically
strike all Mormons from a contract dispute involving a sports bar because they don't drink alcohol.
Or to strike Jews from a tort case because this person was operating a motor vehicle on a Saturday.
I mean, these are important decisions.
But probably the most important decision is that people be fully informed about what a jury really is about.
Thank you. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
You can even watch it by using your eyes.
In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
Yeah, good job.
And you want to know something else?
You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidknightshow.com. That's a website.