The David Knight Show - 7Dec22 Thousand Day Anniversary of Pandemic Orders, and What Happens AFTER 2030? Life in MegaCities

Episode Date: December 7, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES1,000 DAYS! How convenient that 1,000 days of "emergency" Exec Order falls on the anniversary of the Pearl Harbor sneak attack3:01The mRNA and the Spike are both persisting in the vaccinated and accumulating with each booster, and doing genetic damage.4:53Can it be spread/shedded to unvaccinated?7:41Will the damage be spread to future generations? Will it be a seed change to DNA?9:05Rep. Smith’s proposal to reinstate GI Bill benefits for veterans who were kicked out over the vaccine mandate (and another to reinstate)19:09Mainstream media's sudden switch. Two years ago — fawning over China's lockdown and the slander against anyone in the West who opposed the tactic. Today, China is criticized for what they applauded 2 yrs ago 25:30New Yorker denounced anti-lockdown protesters as “militias against masks”.31:52UK has approved and is pushing Pfizer’s low-dose vaccine for babies. But it's not low dose and the abbreviated testing is VERY concerning about safety43:39Mainstream media still pushing fear of Covid, now claiming it damaged livers. Was it something else that did the damage?49:01Restaurant that defied Covid restrictions has been used and betrayed by GOP. An example of what was done to small businesses everywhere54:31Trump turns over Senate seat in GA, yet again, to Democrats58:27Chinese government stole TENS OF MILLIONS in "pandemic relief"1:03:16Waste and hypocrisy over taxes. An army of IRS agents to squeeze $200 BILLION out of Americans over TEN YEARS, but they're giving over $100 MILLION to Ukraine - NO audit. Income tax has NEVER been about money or deficits1:06:33Saxo Bank’s 10 outrageous predictions for 2023.1:20:25Life AFTER 2030, according to the plans of C40, an organization of 97 of the largest cities1:34:52Under the most "generous" scenario, how many vehicles per 1,000 people?1:50:17One flight every, how many years?!!1:53:22They're taking land from Dutch farmers to build — TriState Mega City. A look at the enslavement of people within gigantic cities, globally1:56:56The Netherlands is taking the lead in terms of expropriating the property from the farmers.2:02:03Wristwatches for cows? Or for human cattle?2:12:11Another conservative outlet beside Infowars says Trump did not threaten to suspend the Constitution. Here's how we know they're wrong2:16:44Another drone attack hits another airbase DEEP inside Russian territory as war escalates2:25:47Planned Parenthood executive says children should be exposed to porn early and "babies are sexual beings"2:39:38HHS Sec Xavier Becerra, who cannibalized babies, wants minors to get chemical and surgical mutilation, paid for by government. Refuses to answer if parental consent would be required.2:50:21Fauci's puppies, Musk's monkeys2:56:04If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie These days, life is all... Luckily, with Bank of Ireland's current account and Visa debit card, you get all your day-to-day banking covered for just €6 a month. So you can tap, pay and send in euro with no surprises. Easy. Search Bank of Ireland current account to find out more.

Terms and conditions apply. Send via 365 online and phone. Government stamp duty applies to debit cards and cheques. Bank of Ireland is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Music Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 7th of December, year of our Lord, 2022. 1,000 days of the executive order declaring a state of emergency, medical martial law, and even though they have paused it, don't think for a minute that this thing has stopped. It has been a very successful first run for them.

And they're coming back, and we're going to show you today where they're headed. A very good example, of course, is the Netherlands. I've talked many times about the megacities as part of the UN 2030 agenda. What does their endgame look like? We've seen it with the Saudi Arabian princes line city. Well, today we're going to see the mega city that has been planned and has been planned since they started talking about you in 2030 and about the great reset. The fact that you would own nothing, you would live in their gigantic prison cities. We're going to get to that early on. Stay with us. We'll be right back. Yeah, it's been a thousand days. There is our fearless leader with his face masked.

And with all the military people marching down the corridor. Look at that. Everybody in uniform. Because Operation Warp Speed was a military operation from the very beginning. Going back to dark winter, it was military and the intelligence community.

7th, 1941, a date which will live in infamy. The United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan. Well, we were suddenly and deliberately attacked,

but they had been planning it for quite some time, and many of us had seen it coming, just like many people had seen and tried to warn about what was coming with pearl harbor but there weren't very many people and i guess really when you look at it going back to early 2020 who had been looking at the germ games that had been going had seen their plans drawn up and practiced every year that every year they practiced a lockdown until they could get a rushed vaccine out to everybody telling their participants everybody died because you weren't draconian enough and you didn't push out the vaccine quickly enough and what did we hear exactly Exactly the same thing. So isn't it interesting

that on December 7th, the anniversary, the 81st anniversary of Pearl Harbor, it's a thousand days of medical martial law in the United States. We're not ruled by the constitution anymore. We're ruled by executive orders, especially that one. Biden has stacked on top of that all kinds of things. You've had the CDC say, we're not going to allow you to evict renters that are behind in their rent. We're not going to allow you to foreclose on people, whatever, just interfering in private contracts. And that happened under Trump, was extended under Trump, was extended again under Biden.

It's amazing the power that has been assumed by these people and none of it has been given back. It will never be given back. Power is never given. It is only taken. And we the people are going to have to, one way or the other, take this back. But we have to understand what we've lost to begin with. I want to talk about, I had this, picked this up over the weekend.

Came out actually on Friday after the show. This is Dr. Peter McCullough. He was on, did an interview. And he was talking about the shedding of the vaccine, which has been, we talked about it on Thursday night on Global Warning, the program that's on Rockfin Thursday evening. Everybody was talking about people they knew that had issues with shedding. But there's a lot of scientific studies that have come out. And Dr. Peter McCullough was sharing that as he was talking to Tanya Gough from Action for Canada.

This is what he had to say. He summarized the studies and there's been a lot of other articles about it. And coming up, I'll talk about vaccine impact and how they covered it. They went in a little bit more detail of some of the studies, but they also went into detail about things that you can do to help your health, to strengthen your immune system, to try to fight this type of thing. But here's what Dr. McCullough said. He said, it looks like the messenger RNA is transferring from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated now. He said the mRNA spreads throughout the body. We've known that from the very beginning.

Remember the first people that talked about that? There was a doctor in the U.S. who got the information from a Japanese study. And remember how he was attacked, censored, demonized for telling people that it spreads throughout the body. It doesn't remain localized in the area where you're shot. Well, it's now been shown to be excreted through body fluids, sweat, spit, breast milk, and to pass through the transplacental barrier to developing babies.

And in a paper by Fertig and colleagues, the messenger RNA is found circulating in blood for at least two weeks. And the curves were not going down. That's as long as they looked. They only looked for two weeks and it was not diminishing whatsoever. In another paper, they found messenger RNA in the vaccinated and lymph nodes for months. It looks like the body's not clearing it out. Finally, another study from Hannah and colleagues in the Journal of the American Medical Association

showed that the messenger RNA is in the breast milk of ill-advised women who took the vaccine during pregnancy or afterwards. They were given that ill advice. That's a good way to talk about it. It makes somebody sick. They were given that advice by Rochelle Walensky. Oh, there's no reason at all for a pregnant woman to pass on an untested vaccine. None whatsoever.

Summarizing these thoughts, McCullough proposed a rhetorical question. He said, could you actually take a vaccine inadvertently by close contact, by kissing, by sexual contact, or by breastfeeding? It looks like the answer is yes. He explained the mRNA has never been demonstrated to actually leave the body. He said it looks like it's permanent, as well as the spike protein that is produced after them. And he said, this is very disturbing. This messenger RNA, it looks like it's

for keeps. Every shot is accumulating in the body with no ability for the body to get rid of it. And so you've got to take more and more and more and more shots, right? Can't stop taking those shots. Have another booster. Discussing the ramifications of this, McCullough explained, providing advice for his patients was very difficult. Having first advised his unvaccinated patients to quote, refrain from kissing and sexual contact with a vaccinated person unquote for 30 days. He then extended it later to at least 90 days and was considering extending it from that point forward. He said, I know there's married couples and all kinds of personal implications there. He said, also, we're seeing that on dating apps, now one of the most important checkboxes is if someone is unvaccinated. People really don't want to date vaccinated

people right now. Citing two more studies, McCullough conveyed another alarming finding that since the mRNA remains in the body for an extended period of time, it looks like they do permanently install into the human genome through what we call reverse transcription. He said, this is disturbing that not only does the vaccine not get out of the body, but now they're changing the human genome. He said, it's conceivable that two vaccinated people could actually pass the code for Pfizer or Moderna into the baby permanently. And this is very very disturbing he said for the longest time the people who have promoted genetic modification of humans have drawn a hard line between any genetic modification of babies developing babies they call this a seed. I've talked about this many times.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ie Blood clots can happen to anyone

at any age. Be particularly vigilant if you are going into hospital, have active cancer or undergoing cancer treatment, are pregnant or just had a baby, are in a leg cast or had a lower limb injury, are taking the combined oral contraceptive pill or oral HRT. Ask your doctor for a blood clot risk assessment. Visit thrombosis.ie. Daniel Suarez and his novel Change Agent begins with a very interesting scene.

I think it's one of the best things of the book, just the very introduction of it. There's a black market on genetic modification of babies, because everybody knows that if you make a mistake, it's going to be permanent for that child and for generations to come. And so the scene is between a husband and wife. She's pregnant. They're talking about whether or not, you know, they should proceed with this. And one of them is reluctant.

The other one is for it. So it allows him to make the case. And eventually what he does is he says, well, you know, uses the, you know, we got a nuclear bomb gap type of argument that we always have with everything. You know, your kid, if you don't get it, your kid is going to be a disadvantage to all these other kids who get it. And not only that, but all of your grandchildren and great-grandchildren and on, you're going to create a line of subhumans, essentially. Whereas on the other hand, any attributes that you buy, and what he was selling was individual packages. You could up the intelligence, you could up the athletic

ability, the longevity, all these different characteristics of the child. You could buy. They were all for sale individually, carte blanche, you know, a la carte rather. Yeah, you get a la carte designer babies. And so it was an interesting scene. the calculus that people are making in terms of the governments and the research agencies, as well as what individual people will be looking at. But it is very disturbing, because once you make this change, it's going to be passed on to future generations. This is how insidious this is. You look at it, and with Trump leading the way, traitorous bastard, with him leading the way, they've been able to do this to at least two-thirds of the people. And it's not going to stop there. They'll use, by hook or by crook, they'll try to get other people to take it, but it will also transfer.

This really is a design to take down the human race, to depopulate it. Brian Franklin, thank you very much for the tip. He says, after my brother lived with me at the time, got a second dose, I woke up a couple of nights later numb on one side of my face. Turns out it was mild case of Bell's palsy. Very clearly one of the most obvious side effects of this vaccine and all, a lot of vaccines, but especially this, it definitely sheds. He says, yeah. And I've had a lot of people.

That's what we talked about on a rock fan on Thursday night. People that I've known, um, you know, women who said they, they went to live a friend who went to live with her elderly parents to take care of them after they'd both been vaccinated multiple times, started messing with her cycle, heard other people talking about that as well. So going back to this article, this excellent article from LifeSite News, they cover it well.

The government, as they develop these vaccines, says Dr. McCullough, they kind of rushed it. Oh, the government, as they develop these vaccines, says Dr. McCullough. They kind of rushed it. Oh, the government, as they developed these vaccines, he's afraid. As brave as he is. You don't want to get everybody to turn off the channel when you criticize Trump. And I simply don't care. It's the truth. It's the truth what this guy did.

And we need to understand who betrayed us, who stabbed us in the back, who stabbed us in the arms. It was Donald Trump. As I tweeted out yesterday, all these people fighting, did he really say that he wanted to terminate the Constitution? Hey, pal, he did it a thousand days ago. The script was written by the World Economic Forum. The director was Fauci,

and the producer and marketer was Donald Trump. Wake up. Trump kind of rushed it. Let me correct that for the doctor here. Trump kind of rushed it. There was no assurances that these were safe. There was no genotoxicity. That's looking at damage to the DNA studies.

There was no teratogenicity studies. I had to look that one up. Those are studies about what it does to pregnant mothers and the natal issues, the developing babies. And in autopsy studies, the spike protein produced from the genetic material is found in the heart and in the brain from the autopsies. So I can tell you everyone who has taken the vaccine has this material in their brain, in their heart, in their adrenal glands, and in their reproductive organs.

And it's going to, that's the spike, and of course, you know, the mRNA stuff is going to be continually messing with your DNA. He said, it's a really terrible thought, and my heart goes out to people who have taken the vaccine. He said, the vaccine accelerates death from other causes. So if someone has cancer, the vaccine accelerates that. If someone has heart disease, one is more likely to have fatal heart attacks and strokes. The vaccines cause blood clotting.

The vaccine is incredibly risky. And basically, it's achieving its goal. If the goal was to reduce the world's population, it is working. It is working. This next video here is very visual. I've had it on my deck for a couple of weeks. It went pretty viral.

But today on 1,000 Days, it's a good time to review this. The mounting lies about the efficacy, or I should say the diminishing lies, the diminishing efficacy. All these newspaper reports, and I'll read it to you because it's very visual for the people who are listening. All these reports about its efficacy, starting out at 100% when it was coming out. Here they are. Yeah, 100%. Paper after paper, 100%, 100%. Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson. It's 100% effective.

All these press reports. You want to talk about the role of the press? We're now down to 97, 96, 96.6, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 87% effective. One paper after the other, everywhere in the world, every single one of them lying to you. And it was a lie from the very beginning. We're now down to 69%, 67, 66, 64, 63. 59, 58, 57. It's like an auction.

It's an auction. It's a lottery. Step right up. Take the injection. Trump says it's great. It's the greatest thing ever invented. You heard this from Alan Moore. You heard it from Franklin Graham. We've got to make sure we clarify

that for people. Get the booster in. Get the booster. We know it's highly effective. Now they're halting these mandates. Highly effective. Stunning study reveals just how ineffective and colossally stupid it is.

Who thought you could take a vaccine that's never been tested? Well, you know, he said, we got to do it. From the inside with chaos and iteratively. It was a plan. It was not a mistake. It was not an oversight. It was a deliberate plan. They talked about it in public.

They practiced it for over 20 years. And they had the stooge, Donald Trump, Benedict Donald, do it for them. They positioned him as the polar opposite of the globalist. Oh, yeah, I'm the nationalist. Oh, this guy is rabidly nationalist. All of them played that up. He was an invented character, like a professional wrestler. He is the anti-globalist. Everybody around the world, Trump is our hope.

He's the anti-globalist. And he executed their script perfectly. And he was assisted by people who told you it was 40 chess. He's got this. He's got this. He's got this. Well, now as we're starting to try to undo some of the damage that was done to people in their lives, we have Representative Chris Smith. He's a Republican from New Jersey of all places.

He must be the only one. They must have combined all the Republicans into one district in New Jersey and elected this guy. And he seems to be at least on this vaccine issue and what is happening with the military on the mandates. He's excellent because he has supported and actually authored legislation to reinstate troops who are discharged over the mandate. But now he's got a new proposal, and that is if they don't come back, that we're going to take away this less than honorable discharge so that we don't penalize them and rob them of their benefits as GIs. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. of their benefits as GIs. how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie These days, life is all...

Luckily, with Bank of Ireland's current account and Visa debit card, you get all your day-to-day banking covered for just €6 a month. So you can tap, pay, and send in euro with no surprises. Easy. Search Bank of Ireland current account to find out more. Terms and conditions apply. Send via 365 online and phone. Government stamp duty applies to debit cards and checks.

Bank of Ireland is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. A proposal now. So he's got a proposal to reinstate troops if they want to come back but also a proposal to restore gi bill benefits for veterans who are kicked out over biden's mandate his proposal would require that no troops receive less than an honorable discharge for not complying with the mandate, which would allow them to retain their earned educational benefits. Now, look, if this thing passes or fails, at least what we're going to have is these people going on record saying that

because you didn't take an experimental vaccine, which was legally not authorized. I'm sorry, approved. I even get that. I talk about you you've got emergency use authorization and they have the full approval. And those things are intentionally confusing from a legal standpoint. And so then to make it even more confusing, they say, well, we've approved Cormonati, which is not available, but we're going to mandate you to take Pfizer bio

intake because they're the same thing. However, they is not available, but you know, you were going to mandate that you take Pfizer biointake because they're the same thing. However, they point out they aren't legally distinct. So you haven't legally authorized anything. And it just goes on and on the lies, the prevarications, it's just incredible. But, um, anyway, uh, we're going to get people on record who say, yeah, you know, because somebody has put in decades of their life and because they wouldn't take an experimental drug,

which we lied about it. You know, we said that it was authorized, but it wasn't authorized. I'm sorry, approved. See, I keep doing it myself. It wasn't approved, but we told them that they had to take it anyway. And when they didn't take this unapproved experimental drug, we kicked them out, took all their benefits. You go on record against that.

I'd like to see all of these people go on record. Yeah, we're two years away from the next election, but I hope we don't forget that or forgive that if they do that. Anyway, he said, Congress must act immediately to restore the educational benefits that have been robbed from the brave men and women who answered our nation's call to serve and were forcibly discharged as a result of Biden's vaccine mandate. And so that is a positive. But you see how this stuff is starting to pull back.

And there is hope. People understand what's going on now. Most people. A lot of people still gaslighted. Most people understand what's going on. The question is, how do we stop this? And a lot of people don't understand that the foundation is still there. And it goes back.

That's why I want to make a big deal out of it being 1,000 days. Because that's the foundation. even for the student loan forgiveness, Biden based that on the executive order of Trump. So this article from the new normal is very good. Just like we saw with that video that I played there, all of these, you know, whoever got all of those clips, it took a while, all these different clips, you see it falling from 100%, 100%. And that was something that was completely invented by the media, by the way.

You know, Pfizer didn't really say it was 100% effective. They came out, you know, I've talked about this timeline many times. So you have the election on Tuesday. On Saturday, Biden is declared the winner by the media. The very next day, they've got it in the can at 60 minutes where they talk about Operation Warp Speed, everybody in uniform, and they're going to roll this thing out as soon as the tests come back. And they play that on Sunday night. Then on Monday, Pfizer said, well, we got our test back and it looks really good. You know, we are a 90% effective. Very next day, Russia comes out, says 92% effective.

The following Monday, Moderna comes out and says we're 94% effective. And the next day, Pfizer comes out, says 94.5. You see how they do they do this stuff I mean it was so obvious just within the first week that they were lying up one side and down the other and of course they had no way to know if it was effective there's absolutely no way they could do for vaccines it took years because you don't do any challenge these are you know vaccines are supposed to prevent something it's not a therapeutic with a therapeutic you, you have the phase one through three trials. And in phase two and three, you give the therapeutic to people who have a condition or disease to see if it makes it better or cures it. But when you're talking about a vaccine, it's just to make sure that people don't get it.

Well, you can't expose the people that you just gave a placebo to to a disease, especially when it's COVID. And that's the most deadly disease the world has ever known, right? Yeah. So they have to circulate amongst the population. They have two groups, one that you give a placebo to, and the other one that you have given the vaccine that's supposed to protect them from whatever the disease is. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Blood clots can happen to anyone at any age. Be particularly vigilant if you are going into

hospital, have active cancer or undergoing cancer treatment, are pregnant or just had a baby, are in a leg cast or had a lower limb injury, are taking the combined oral contraceptive pill or oral HRT. Ask your doctor for a blood clot risk assessment. Visit thrombosis.ie. And then you look to see how they're doing a couple of years on.

And so they couldn't possibly know any of these efficacy numbers they were making everything up it's pretty clear from the first week that this is just a numbers game and then the game got upped by the mainstream media by fouch you know it's about 100 100 100 So the new normal substat looks at what people were saying about lockdowns then. And what they're saying about China's zero covid policies now. The title of the article is The Gall of Lockdowners Who Support China's Anti-Lockdown Protests. Michael Singer says, if the intent was to get Western elites to simultaneously support totalitarianism in their own countries

while pretending to oppose it in China, then Xi Jinping has certainly made his point, even by Chinese standards. The lockdowns that Xi pioneered with the onset of COVID are horrific in terms of their scale, their duration, their depravity, and the new totalitarian surveillance method measures to which they've led.

Apple has been silent about the protests. Isn't that interesting? And they've had the gall to limit the protesters' use of communication service device called AirDrop in compliance with the CCP's demands. And they did it in advance. They saw this buildup coming in and they told Apple, get rid of airdrop. And Apple pushed out an update in China and nowhere else have they turned that

off except in China. So the people have to go through the internet to communicate with each other digitally. They cannot just communicate with each other in close proximity privately. Apple, coming after this to destroy your property. And of course, you know, if you want to get your iPhone, I think the slogan ought to be, made by slaves for slaves.

Remember, it's the big brother device. That's what NSA called it back in 2012. They had the posters. Who would have thought that Apple would come up with a big brother device, the iPhone, and that the zombies, said the NSA, would line up to buy it themselves. We don't even have

to buy it for them. They pay for it out of their own pocket. Zombies, they said. So all this comes even after Apple has long ignored requests by the FCC officials to remove the Chinese-owned app TikTok from its app store over unprecedented national security concerns. And we're going to talk about that coming up. What? TikTok versus Twitter. What is it about these two apps? They get all the governments so upset. The U's upset about Musk having Twitter.

America's upset about China having TikTok. I mean, they're just comments and silly little games and things like that, right? No, there's much more in it. Anyway, getting back to this article, he says, Fauci told CNN that China's totalitarian lockdowns would be fully justified as long as they're used to get all people vaccinated, because that's what he's been practicing for 20-plus years before he did it himself. From dark winter to event 201. In 2020, the New York Times, and I'll pull up some of these headlines here

so people can see this here. He's juxtaposed these headlines. In 2020, the New York Times denounced anti-lockdown protesters as anti-vaxxers, anti-capitalist, neo-Nazis, and they urged the United States to be more like China. So you've got headlines like this, Germany's coronavirus protests, anti-vaxxers, anti-capitalists, and neo-Nazis. I thought the New York Times is anti-capitalist. Anyway, U.S. says virus cannot be controlled, but China aims to prove it wrong. They're going to do everything they can, and they're going to control it.

And we've seen this from NPR. NPR is still saying, well, you know, China's done really well with this zero-COVID stuff. They've done so much better than the rest of the world. Look at the statistics that they put out. Oh, really? You believe anything that the Chinese government puts out of statistics? I said from the very beginning, I said every statistic coming out of China and Washington is a lie.

They lie in Washington. They lie about the inflation rate. They lie about the unemployment rate. They've lied in the past about flu. You think they're lying and telling you the truth about COVID? Anyway, so that's what the New York Times said in 2020. In 2022, the New York Times admired the bravery of China's anti-lockdown protesters now fighting Xi. They said, quote, an unbending approach to the pandemic that has hurt businesses and strangled growth is what Xi is doing.

Xi Jinping. Chinese protests over zero COVID follow months of economic pain. In 2020, CNN published an open letter from over a thousand health professionals, they said, denouncing anti-lockdown protests as rooted in white nationalism, while at the same time admiring China's success compared to Europe. They said China's COVID success compared to Europe shows lockdowns are the first step, not a solution. That's right, it's the first step.

I guess somebody clued in CNN about the fact that they've been practicing this from dark winter to event 201. It's your first step. You keep them locked down until you got the poison vaccine ready. But in 2022, CNN admired China's anti-lockdown protesters as young people who cry for freedom. There you see the headline there. In 2020, the Washington Post announced anti-lockdown protesters as angry populists who deeply distrust

elites, and they openly wish that the U.S. was more like China. Yeah, the movement against coronavirus lockdowns is still going and still angry, said the Washington Post. The U.S. has absolutely no control over the coronavirus. China, though, is on top of the tiniest risks. But this year, the Washington Post, in 2022, with a protest going on now in China, the Washington Post celebrated global demonstrations of solidarity with China's anti-lockdown protests. You understand what's happening.

What is the difference? Well, right now, they perceive, they're moving, positioning themselves to go to war with China over Taiwan. So China is now the enemy, and we must criticize them. They have been the beta test site for a very long time for globalism. And so they were always applauded by these people. Everybody wanted to be like the Chinese quote-unquote president who could just order people around. He's a dictator. In 2020, the New Yorker denounced anti-lockdown protesters as militias against masks.

That was the headline. Another one, how China controlled the coronavirus. Another one. Oh, China can control it. But now, this year, with these protests, New Yorker says, Chinese protesters warily tell Xi Jinping, don't push me. Earlier this year, Amnesty International issued a statement of concern about Canada's anti-lockdown Freedom Convoy protests being affiliated with overtly racist white supremacist groups.

It's just so childish. Anybody that they oppose, they accuse of being a racist. Which, as I've always said, the danger of that is that when you have real racists like Kanye Fuentes, they get a pass by so many people because they were just so tired. It's a crying wolf, right? Amnesty International, Canada statement on freedom convoy blockade. Oh, yeah, they are, you know, racist white people. But now Amnesty International has issued a statement urging the Chinese government to not detain peaceful protesters. Now, this is just the news headlines. This is not the hypocrisy of people like Justin Trudeau, of course. These headlines are, of course, in addition to the

hundreds of other commentators, influencers, health officials, such as New York Times journalist Zeynep Tufekci. I don't know. I'm guessing how you pronounce her name. And this is, again, this is coming from the New Normal Substack. He got her tweet then and now. Then this reporter for the New York Times said, here's another thread about this with a cool preprint at the end. It's really a tough road ahead. In case there's any misunderstanding right now in the U S we should be in full

lockdown. And she emphasizes should, but now we're in crisis stage. Now this year she comes back and she said, American academics, quote unquote wanted Chinese level authoritarianism is beyond parody to say that we really wanted this so he goes back and gets her tweet from april 24th 2020 that's about the time that actually it's a little bit earlier in april that the anti-defamation league and daily beasts and they were singled me out why they singled me out of info wars because I was the only one saying it there. That we're under medical martial law. Look at this! Radical!

Paranoid! Conspiracy theorist! Says we're under medical martial law. Yeah. So she goes on to say now, she says, I guess you could find a marginal figure or two somewhere like maybe her. The idea was that any desire

or possibility of welding doors shut is profoundly disrespectful to the reality and the bravery of Chinese people. Well, as this article says, there was no history of anything ever being done like that before in the world. It was absolutely unprecedented. And part of that was a scare tactic. It got a lot of people scared. We've never seen anything like this before.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

Oh, and it's coming out of an area that has a biosafety level 4 lab. So it must be dangerous. And I said, they lie about everything. And if you lock down, that is the worst possible response, even to the worst possible bioweapon. Anyway. So yeah, that it was unique. It was unique for them. And nobody had ever done anything like that before, but they had practiced it for 20 years, the military industrial complex and the intelligence community and Fauci and his people. So Chinese communist apologists have argued that these videos

proved that the CCP was not trying to influence the international response to COVID because they make the CCP look so bad. No, they're putting out videos of young people just spontaneously falling down the street, which is just another example. We now see, we've had so many videos of that happening to athletes and people who are giving speeches or people who are doing the news,

some of them dying. And, you know, that is from the vaccine i should repeat again the vaccine the trump shot is the bioweapon not any virus thing um so on the contrary the overtopping humanity the idea of welding residence doors shut was precisely the purpose of the propaganda campaign. The idea had to be so absurd that no decent government would ever actually try it. This gave the CCP and its apologists an infinite excuse for why lockdowns, quote-unquote, worked in China and nowhere else, because only China had a real lockdown in which residents were welded into their homes. Or, you know, that was for show. I mean, a much simpler way to do it, which they're now doing now that they're not, you

know, trying to show people stuff. Simpler way to do it is you just drill a hole in the concrete outside the door and put a rod in there so they can't open the door. So they've produced their graphs out of china showing total deaths and of course their total lies total manipulation on the line um yeah go ahead and show the video there where they're welding the door yeah look at that it's all just theater it's theater i mean how many times we have to go around and show them, you know, practicing, and somebody occasionally will get a video

of how they've set everything up to do all this stuff. The entire concept is utterly asinine. You cannot stop a respiratory virus by indefinitely and suspending everyone's rights. This idea that lockdowns had worked in China because the CCP had gone so far as to well people in their homes was used over and over and over again during COVID. So we were told over and over again, be more like China. And then at the beginning of January 2021,

I put up a video on YouTube as I create a new channel. I said, 2020, the year the world became China. And of course, Google censored me, took me off shortly after that. The use of this darkly humorous propaganda campaign of welding residents into their homes speaks of two key points of how Xi Jinping views China's relationship with the West. The first is that Westerners will never respect the CCP.

Thus, you can make Westerners believe anything so long as it confirms their prior belief that the CCP is barbaric. Second, Xi Jinping sees the concepts of democracy and human rights as mere propaganda that Western elites use to further their own self-interest. You mean people like Justin Trudeau? Yeah. For him, when he talks about democracy, when Biden and the rest of these people talk about democracy, it is nothing other than propaganda.

He's not stupid. And we're not stupid. We know what that is. And it's all of them, frankly. So long as they approve of a policy, then it is not a human rights violation. But if they oppose it, then it is. Then it is. Yeah, the beta test site for all this stuff.

So, as I said, Vaccine Impact also talks about shedding the vaccine to the unvaccinated. But I wanted to steer you to that article. I'm not going to go into all the details of it, but I think it is an excellent article with a lot of good suggestions of things that are going to improve your health significantly that have been very helpful for a lot of people in addressing things. The first one he talks about is fasting, and there's been a lot of evidence about the efficacy of fasting for your body to be able to repair itself. And he, um, um, talks about a book. He says, it goes back to the early two thousands that I read a

early two thousands. I read a book on fasting by Dr. Joel Furman titled fasting and eating for health. He says, I don't agree with his dietary advice. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. But at the time, this is by far the best fasting book I'd ever read. And it begins with this introduction. Years ago, a 20-year-old world-class athlete, an Olympic ice skating hopeful, suffered a severe injury to his leg. He was forced to walk on crutches. He could not bear weight on his leg without excruciating pain. His heel was so swollen and sensitive that the mere weight of a bed sheet caused intense discomfort. So he is going to leading orthopedic surgeons because he's an Olympic athlete,

a lot of different people, and they came up with all these different things that were not working. And then somebody who was about to do a very experimental operation that was going to be very dangerous. And because of that, he's like, well, I'm not going to do that. So he just left. He says he was aware that a few years earlier, his arthritic father had restored his health by fasting. He remembered the articles and books that he'd read on fasting at the time. He realized the technique probably offered his best chance to recover. So he traveled to Dr. Shelton's health school in San Antonio, and he fasted there under the doctor's supervision,

because it can be very dangerous if you don't do it the right way. An extended fast can be very, very dangerous. You've got to do it the right way. You've got you don't do it the right way. An extended fast can be very, very dangerous. You got to do it the right way. You got to come off of it the right way. So he goes to a doctor in San Antonio who specialized in that and he fasted for 46 days. At the end of the fast, he was able to walk again. And in a little over a year, he placed third in the world Professional Figure Skating Championships. The young man saw at the clinic asthmatics who were cured so they no longer needed medication. He met colitis patients with bleeding bowels who recovered without any drugs or surgery.

He observed people with chest pain who had been told they needed bypass surgery, but they were riding bicycles and jogging for the first time in years. The young man saw for himself how the body could heal itself if the causes of disease were removed. I'll go to the next thing that he has here, and I'm not going to go into that much detail on all these, but he's at high-dose vitamin C therapy. He's talking about intravenous. It's expensive. It's temporary, but it can be effective. And he says if you're having problems, he says in this particular case, high dosages of vitamin C are irritating to his digestive system. So he's found that liposomal vitamin C works very well for him. That is more

expensive than the other types of vitamin C, but it is, we talk about liposomal, that means it's kind of encased in a fat thing. So you can buy it in individual packages, but it's more expensive than the other types of vitamin C, but it's supposed to also be better absorbed. He talks about vitamin D. He talks about healthy oils.

I'm not going to go into all this. This one I thought was interesting. White willow bark for blood thinning. He said, especially if you're worried about shedding and things like that because it affects the blood, affects clots. He said, white willow bark is what they use to develop aspirin from. But unlike aspirin, it doesn't irritate your digestive system. If you go back to the original natural

thing instead of what Bayer produced. So it's a natural blood thinner from that standpoint. And so I would highly recommend that article that is at vaccineimpact.com. A lot of people talking about Kirstie Alley. Was she vaccinated or not? She died at 71. She had discovered cancer that moved very quickly. So that does sound like a vaccine. However, she also appeared to be a jab skeptic throughout. She pushed back very hard against the mandates, but she also seemed to be very skeptical.

Some people did. Some people said, hey, you know, I think it's great, but nobody should be mandated to have this stuff. Everybody ought to have their own informed consent respected. But she seemed to also be very, very skeptical about the vaccines itself. So I would not go out on a limb and say that her death was due to that. Maybe she picked up something from shedding, but I don't think that would be a difficult case to make. I would not suggest people do, but I know a lot of people will. That's why I mention it.

The UK has approved the Pfizer vaccine for babies, despite a study that shows that one in 500 have been hospitalized with side effects. This is a, I would say, well, you know, that's not too bad. That's their response. Yeah, why should you, they have absolutely no risk, and that's what they point out in this article from the Daily Skeptic out of the UK. Regulators gave the green light for all infants older than six months to get a special low-dose formula of Pfizer's jab.

Now, they take this down to three micrograms, they say. But do you remember when Naomi Wolf and her team got the data and they were able to get data that showed how the dosage of the vaccines was fluctuating from three micrograms to 100 micrograms based on dosage. That's a tremendous fluctuation. And said that it looks like almost all the side effects were with the, you know, in deaths and things like that, were people who got the higher dosage of 100 micrograms. So they're saying, well, we're going to take it down to three micrograms for the babies.

But they want to give them two shots and a booster. And it accumulates. It doesn't go away, as I just told you. So they're going to take it back up to the dosage that they were giving adults. And then it also begs the question, how is it that Pfizer's dosages could vary that much from 3 to 100 micrograms? Do they really have that poor a quality control? I mean, the difference between a poison and medicine is the dosage, right?

If they had that poor quality control on other medicines, they'd be killing people. You'd have situations where people get it and drop dead, like you see with the Pfizer thing, right? And in anything other than this, they would have stopped it, and they would have gotten in a lot of trouble. You can't have, quote-unquote, quality control that allows the dosage to vary by a factor of 33 times. That's nonsense.

So what was it? I think it was a lab experiment. That's why they kept the lots. And that's how Naomi Wolf was able to figure that out. So it's either zero quality control or they are intentionally doing this as an experiment. I think it's the latter. So they're going to give this to the little babies who have absolutely no risk. They said only 6% of the people aged 5 to 11 in England

have had two doses of COVID vaccine. So you've got to get that up. Got to have more money, more customers. Up to June 2021, only four children in all of the UK and Ireland under the age of 11 had died with COVID, not from it. They had comorbidities. And, of course, we've had Dr. McCary from Johns Hopkins saying they went back when it was 300 that were reported as having died from COVID. They went back and looked at it and said,

we've not found a single one that died from it. They died from other things. So the cumulative effect of this is unknown, but the cumulative effect will be the same as giving these young children a full adult dose. Interestingly enough, Borla, the CEO of Pfizer, has refused to testify to the European Union again, but listen to what he has to say. He says, we have no further information to share. Yeah. Take two shots and call me in 60 to 70 years, right? Since the October COVID hearing,

we have no further information to share with the committee. But he didn't go to that hearing. He brushed them off at that hearing too. He makes it sound like, yeah, I already came and gave you everything, told you everything I know. So I'm not coming back again because I don't have any new information. But he didn't give him a testimony then either. Just amazing. Finally, we got here. Drug report is pushing this pretty hard. COVID-19. See how I tell you this is not over. They want to talk about how dangerous COVID still is. They want to talk about things they call long COVID. It's not a virus. It's not anything like that. It is the

vaccine and it's the drugs. And so it says COVID-19 can cause serious liver damage that lasts months after the infection. Is it? Is it from that? Or maybe is it from remdesivir? Remdesivir is notorious for damaging the liver. And even as they're trying to determine this, they're talking about liver stiffness. And so they're massaging this data and the liver to get exactly what they want. They don't have a control group there to say, well, didn't these people get remdesivir

and these other dangerous drugs? Because many drugs will do a number on your liver because your liver tries to filter the stuff out. But they said with our pandemic control group had less stiffness than there was with the pre-pandemic control group. Oh, so it's all based on that, right? It's just crazy, crazy what they've done. Before we take a break here, I want to thank Utopian Lobotomy. Thank you very much for the tip.

Mary Russell, thank you as well. Could Travis check into Discord service for a place where the audience could chat? How is dogo? Um, is that a, a, a site or are they asking about scout?

Okay. Now scout is doing much better. Yeah. He said he's got a long scar on his leg that never quite healed back, but the skin did grow over, but he didn't, it's still pink in the middle of his black leg and um he has um since that medical ordeal while he was there they vaccinated him against star will and he's

been having uh allergies and all kinds of stuff ever since so there's been other things that have happened um he was inactive uh for about nine I mean, he was super active as a border collie. He got inactive and he has gained a lot of weight and aged really rapidly. But he's still there and still smart and still a great, great dog. So, yeah, we will look into that. And we're talking about how we'd like to get some chats, especially on the evening show. It's a smaller audience and we could do a lot to talk with people. Thank you very much, Mary.

And Amos Poole, thank you very much. That's very generous. I appreciate that on Rockfin. Although 2001 was when they started the annual preparations for a medical takeover, the AIDS testing scam, yes, was the actual enactment of a eugenics terror campaign directed at people of color with signs all over their neighborhoods to quote, do the responsible thing and test the tests like PCR is used today.

We're worthless. And like today, the treatments did the killing. Merry Christmas. Well, thank you, Amos. I appreciate that.

Yes. And it was interesting. Carrie Mullis. I've talked about this many times, really went head to head with Fauci Cary Mullis won a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test, and he said you can't use that to even prove a link between a virus and AIDS. He said AIDS could be caused by any number of things,

but he said you can test, you can find anything if you magnify it enough, and so Fauci at least learned that much, and so he magnified it by 1.1 trillion times by doing a cycle threshold of 40. That means that you double it 40 times, get up to 1.1 trillion times. And you can find anything, as the inventor of that mentioned. And, of course, Fauci really built his career on that whole AIDS panic and that lie. And if you want to go back, all the people said, oh, well, you said that

this is a virus and people could catch it and transmit it through the blood. And so everybody was worried about mosquitoes and all the rest of this stuff. Remember that? A lot of people said, well, you ostracized the homosexual community because of AIDS. You want to blame somebody? Blame Fauci, who said it was something that was being caught like a virus or a germ or something like that. He was the one who said that. Cary Mullis pushed back on it and Cary Mullis died just a couple of months before they rolled this thing out. He would have been a very, very effective spokesperson pushing back against that. We're going to make a quick break and we'll be right back and talk about the, what the.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 Euro. If your horse loses on a selected race

that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee smart city stuff looks like. Stay with us. Should old acquaintance be forgot and buried within my soul? All right. And I was going to play some music, but I came back too soon. Restaurant that defied COVID restrictions has been raided. They appealed to Governor Youngkin in Virginia, who held a political rally there in October. And nothing at all from him.

This is a metaphor, I think, for the entire GOP. Yeah, it makes Youngkin look bad, but do you realize that for a thousand days, this is basically what the GOP has done? You know, it was the small businesses, the working class, the middle class who had elected Trump and, um, you know, small businesses, especially typically oriented towards the Republicans. They were told they were not essential. They were locked down.

They were harassed and we got absolutely no help from these people. Yeah. Yeah. Kick out some pandemic cash to kick off a wave of inflation. But I know this is what they all did. The Virginia ABC Authority, backed by Virginia State Police troopers, raided a Spotsylvania County restaurant that defied orders to close

in the face of government-ordered coronavirus restrictions in 2021. So this is going back quite a ways. Agents came to Gore Meltz on Route 1. They seized $10,000 of liquor, and they downloaded data from the restaurant's computers. It was the latest move in a chess game between the state and the restaurant owner, Matt Strickland, going on since January of 2021. When the health department ordered Gore Meltz to close for not adhering to former Governor Northam's executive order requiring restaurants to limit the number of patrons

inside their restaurants due to coronavirus fears. So those long lingering orders that are there. People still being attacked and harassed. I just talked the last couple of days about how, and I think it was in San Jose County, California, where they kept coming after churches with hundreds of thousands of dollars of fines because they met a couple of years ago

and just got slapped down by the state Supreme Court, even though they won in one of the other courts, the court state Supreme court said, this is a clear violation of the constitution. It's in violation of Supreme court decisions. And they depublished that lower court decision. Just wipe it away. But these types of things are still going.

I mean, and in LA they're talking about reinstituting mask mandates again. It's not going away. It's all predicated on this Trump executive order and many other things that they have now used to usurp authority. But that is the foundational thing that gave them legal cover as well as massive amounts of money incentivizing this kind of action. And when we talk about the money and the help, oh, well, we're going to shut you down. You're not essential. We're going to shut you down, but don't worry. We'll give you extended unemployment benefits. We'll give you this PPP plan, which more than 50% of it went to 5% of the companies, companies that were not small businesses. The lion's share of the money went to

the big businesses because after they said it's going to be for a small business, they redefined what a small business was. Not a business that has fewer than 500 employees, but a business that has fewer than 500 employees at a location. Oh, so McDonald's is a small business. Did you know that? And they qualify just like a restaurant, except better than a restaurant, because the bank is going to get a percentage of the fees. Same amount of paperwork, but a percentage of the money that's handed out. So who is the bank going to want to process? You know, the small mom and pop restaurant or McDonald's.

So, yeah, And by the way, while we're talking about Trump, uh, that election that happened, I'll just mention it real quickly. Um, yeah, it looks like, um, you have a Warnick winning this one and, uh, we don't have that in the thing here. Yeah. He's, um, I was going to show you a picture of how the election broke down. If you look at it, you know, they're red and blue colors. You see that the entire state was red, except for urban areas of Atlanta, the big one. Okay. So Atlanta is solid Democrat. You see Savannah, Georgia and Augusta, Georgia have are solid Democrats. So these three big cities take the whole election.

Everything else was won by the Republican, by Walker. And this is what is happening in state after state. It's why Virginia has so many people elected as... Sorry, I had to sneeze. That's why Virginia has, I say, become purple. Well, it's because of the suburbs of Washington, D.C., areas like Virginia Beach that are highly Democrat, and they swamp out the population of the rural areas.

I've seen this even on a county level. I've talked about that before. We lived in a North Carolina county that was all rural, and then there was spillover in one corner of it from the people who worked at UNC Chapel Hill. So it spilled into that community. Well, they couldn't take over the community and change all the different, all the rules about how you could use your land and everything and punish the farmers and steal their land from them.

They couldn't do that until they changed the way county commissioners were elected. They had been elected on a geographical basis. So they broke the county up into different geographical units. Each unit would elect somebody from their area. And so what they did was they just made all of the county commissioners electable at large. So everybody that's on the ballot, you have a slate of electors, and everybody votes for every single seat for the county commissioner, not just one. And they put up a slate.

They organized this change, and then as soon as they got the change, they put up a slate of people that were all these Marxist liberals out of the UNC Chapel Hill, where they did a lot of these experiments. And they took over the county and they, you know, just completely changed everything. And so that's the beauty of the electoral college. But even within states and even within counties, these liberal population centers, like a university town or something, are going to completely control the government. And that's what happened there. But also, the other aspect of it was, this is the third senator from Georgia that Trump has given to the Democrats. Because the first two that happened, it was based on the corrupt lockdown elections, the

mail-in elections that he set the conditions for. And even as he was protesting that for himself, they did nothing to change the rules for that election. Everybody knows the date, January the 6th, that was a Wednesday, January the 5th was the date that they had the runoff election for two Senate seats. And everybody was so caught up on Donald Trump that they forgot to do anything at all about those two Senate seats. And they both went Democrat. And so then Donald Trump handpicks a guy who is a celebrity candidate, doesn't know anything about politics, not an effective speaker, playing celebrity and identity politics.

And this is what you get. A third Georgia Senator given over to the Democrats by Donald Trump. So we now have two Congresses where the majority Senate is a direct consequence of Trump and his celebrity politics. People like Dr. Oz. I mean, seriously, you look at Oz, you look at, I'm not Oz, but you look at Fetterman, you look at Warnock, you look at so many of these people. Like, how many, how many candidates could you find that could easily beat these clowns? And yet we have to go with the celebrity idiots who have absolutely no

understanding or principles of what's going on. And you lose the seat. Anyway, let's go back to the, what happened with the PPP funds? The Chinese government stole millions, tens of millions. And they've only looked at about a dozen states.

And some people said, well, if this has happened in a dozen states, if they've been able to steal at least $20 million out of a dozen states, they did it in every state. This is cyber theft that was done on the Small Business Administration, PPP things. They said this is the first known instance of pandemic fraud tied to foreign state-sponsored cyber criminals. So China does this rollout, showing them welding people into homes and showing kids falling

down in the middle of the street and all the rest of this nonsense. It was totally fake. And then when we locked down everybody and they put out, just shower them lavishly with cash, they decide they'll step in and rip us off. And that's what they did. There are now more than 1,000 ongoing investigations involving transnational and domestic criminal actors. One person at a cybersecurity firm called Mandiant said, I've never seen them target government money before. Well, we've never had government be so loose with their spending

almost $4 trillion. Yeah. I mean, how, how could you not soak up some of that? I mean, that's a very small percentage when you stop and think about it, you know, if they got 20 million off about a dozen, you know, maybe they're going to get about a hundred million, uh, overall that's teeny tiny compared to um you know nearly four million four trillion dollars so uh yeah they're just um showering everybody with helicopter cash a heritage foundation analysis of labor department data estimates that there was also excess unemployment benefits payments of more than 350350 billion from April, 2020 to May, 2021.

So it's not just that. I mean, you know that we're talking about maybe a hundred million. We're talking about a thousand times more in terms of unemployment fraud and throwing money at people to keep them pacified as you lock them down. It was a massive pacifier given to people as they took everything away from us and took away our ability and our freedom. But, you know, when you look at that timeframe there, that period of time they looked at 350, but more than 350 billion with a B.

One person said, well, whether it's 350, 400, 500 billion, at this point, the horse is out of the barn. We don't really care. Oh, really? Yeah. 100 billion here, 100 billion there. Who cares? Well, that was 10 months of that time period was President Trump.

Four months was President Biden. So, yeah, it is a tag team match, but they keep going with it. Four charts expose the Fed's hypocrisy. They want to crack down on us really hard, right, with the IRS. I talked about this last week. Are they 1099Ks? Biden is going to take it from, well, you've got to have 200 of these to report it, 200 events. No, we'll take it down to one. It's got to it. 200 events. No, we'll take it down to one.

It's got to be 20,000. No, we'll take it down to $600 because we've got to come after the rich people. Every time they come after us, they say they're coming after the rich people, right? So they're cracking down on taxpayers. While they're showering money and making it so that foreign governments can hack it. $80 billion to hire 87,000 more agents in the hopes of bringing in, what? $200 billion. That's not even half of what they fraudulently paid out too much of in unemployment benefits.

And they point out in 2021 alone, the federal government spent $279 billion of taxpayers money on improper welfare payments. So maybe what they should do is take these 87,000 IRS agents and audit themselves, not us. Why do they do it to us? I mean, we're talking about, uh, they're going to save $200 billion, but they say over the next, they're going to squeeze $200 billion out of us with these 87,000 IRS agents and audits and new forms that are confusing and all the rest of this stuff. But they're going to do that over the next 10 years. They're going to save $200 billion.

Just look at what they're doing in Ukraine, for example. In Ukraine, we're going to wind up giving Ukraine $100 billion and, you know, money to Zelensky and his crooks, military equipment. We're not auditing any of that stuff. We have no idea where that stuff is going. Not even the weapons do we really audit. They just started talking about, you know, we should really audit those weapons. Yeah, we should. But, you know, it's really hard. I don't know if we could audit the tens of billions of dollars of weapons that we sent. But, yeah, we probably should at least try.

So in just the first year of the Ukraine war, they're going to spend $100 billion, probably more by the time you get to the anniversary of March. And yet, they want to squeeze us really hard to get twice that amount over a 10-year period. Over a 10-year period. So, at a cost of more than $2,000 per household, Americans are paying more for bureaucrats to send faulty payments out of people this is typical of what you see uh this is um from the daily signal it's got stats from the heritage foundation this is what you typically see from these conservative organizations how can we make the welfare state more efficient well you just shut it down you know we get a lot of government waste and fraud.

How do we shut that government? Well, you shut down entire agencies and programs that there's no authority for under the constitution and that have been proven to not work. That's what you do. But, um, you know, taxes have never been about the deficits. They made that very clear. Uh, we've been running deficits virtually my entire life. There's only, I think, one or two years where it was in a surplus in my lifetime. They don't really care about that, except when it comes to taxes, and they start talking, oh, deficits, deficits. We're going to have to raise your taxes because of deficits.

They've never cared about this. Even before they had the magic money tree, the MMT, the modern monetary theory. They never cared about deficits. Why? Because they have the petro dollar. They got the global reserve currency and they can just print this stuff out of thin air. They never have to balance the books.

And so they don't have to tax us either. Why do they do it? They do it because they don't want us to have any disposable income. They do it because they don't want us to have any disposable income. They do it because they don't want us to save any money and create any personal wealth. They do it because they don't want us to have capital formation to go into competition with their cronies. That's why they do it.

And they do it to control us and to surveil us. Back in the days when they didn't have all the sophisticated electronics and all the rest of the stuff, the IRS was a wonderful way for them to surveil people. And they would take less money because, again, they don't need the money. They don't need the money. They don't care about the deficits. So they would take less money than the EU would with its

VAT tax, but they would do it in a way, even though it was annoying to people and caused friction, they would do it in a way that they could observe us, control us, and have something that would be incriminating for us if they wanted to come after us for anything. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. I want to talk a little bit about what Biden wants to do in terms of banning all semi-automatic weapons as he puts it. Does he even know what the term means?

Well, you better take them seriously. This is The David Knight Show. Well, there's always a question as to whether or not Biden really means what he says, or if he even understands the words that are coming out of his mouth. I would say the same thing is true of President Trump. You know, you have people say, well, the excuse I've heard for Trump for the longest time is people are talking about this statement. Well, you know, this kind of fraud allows for the suspension of all rules, regulations, and the Constitution itself.

Oh, he didn't mean that. He didn't mean to suspend the Constitution. And the people who are trying to excuse this will come back and say well trump needs to be taken seriously but not literally not literally well you can say the same thing about biden he says it's wise to take seriously the threats of powerful people who have the means to at least attempt to impose their will on others. Biden said on the Thanksgiving weekend, said the idea that we still allow semi-automatic weapons to be purchased is sick. It's just sick.

These people talk about semi-automatic weapons. They talk about assault weapons. They don't know the difference between semi-automatic and automatic apparently. They don't have a definition for assault weapons. They don't really care. It's not about that. That's just rhetoric for their base. It is about,

um, taking all the guns. And he says it's sick to have semi-automatic weapons. These are weapons that you have to pull the trigger each time to fire a bullet. What's the alternative to that? Are we going to allow only muzzleloaders and bolt-action rifles? Is that the alternative?

So the idea that we'd allow people to do that, that's just sick. Well, I would say the idea that we allow people to violate their oath, to usurp authority, to remain in office after they do all that stuff, and the fact that we would still cheer them years afterwards, still showering money and accolades on people like Trump, I think that is sick, quite frankly. I think it's very sick. Walmart is saying that shoplifting and theft has gotten so bad, they may have to start closing stores and also raising prices. Target, as I pointed out a couple of weeks ago, said that they'd lost $400 million from theft.

They said that shoplifting at Target had jumped 50% year over year. This is another planned piece of chaos, planned by the district attorneys, promoted by George Soros and the left, by state attorneys general, but especially the district attorneys who say, we're not going to punish any of that. We're not going to stop it. And so, you know, just as we tolerate theft and shoplifting, we also celebrate and tolerate theft at the highest levels of government, don't we? It really is another sign of a society that is collapsing into degeneracy and kleptocracy.

I remember the first time I went up to New York, big city, very different from where I was living at the time in Florida. Tampa was not that big a city. New York was. When I went there in the late 70s, there was just so much corruption. There was this big divide between the wealthy and the poor, and there was not really much of a middle class.

And everybody had this attitude, well, you know, I'm going to get them before they get me. I'm going to steal from them before they steal from me. I'd never seen that before. But now you're seeing that everywhere. You're seeing that it's gone national, that type of attitude. And it's a corruption that goes from the top down. If you want to know how corrupt our society is, look at how much money we give to politicians for elections. It's a great metric of corruption because what it shows is that you have to pay off politicians in order to do business. That's the way New York City was.

That's the way that Trump got wealthy. He paid off politicians. He paid off unions. He bought them. He paid off Hillary Clinton to get what he wanted. And so then he wanted to get in a position where people paid him. That's corruption. And that's why people are spending so much more on elections. Again,

$170 million combined from both Bush and Gore in the 2000 election, from all sources, all the PACs, the RNC, the DNC, all of that, $170 million. We had six Senate races that were more than that in an off-year election, and that's not counting all the other offices that were close to that. Uh, so, um, talk about the insanity of our society. I think nothing shows it better than what has happened with Hertz rental

company. Remember the, uh, old commercials? Do things you've never done before. Hertz lets you change the pace completely. Go where you want, when you want. If you wish, take up to 20 months to pay with the new Hertz revolving credit plan.

So why hold yourself back? You get a rest while Hertz does the rest. Yeah. That commercial where they were able to, this is, uh, when they did not have computer special effects, lowering people into a convertible car like that, let Hertz put you in the driver's seat. Well, they could also put you in jail or they could also put you in danger, which they did to a lot of people by reporting the cars that they had rented as stolen, even though they had returned the vehicles. And they even reported people who had never rented their cars

as having stolen their cars. They turned their information over to the police, who swatted them, who arrested them, who put guns in their face, who put them in jail for days, months in some cases. And now they are paying $168 million to settle hundreds of claims by customers who are falsely reported by the rental car companies having stolen its vehicles. Some innocent renters arrested and jailed for weeks or months over the reports.

They said 364 claims. Well, if you average that out, and maybe it is an average because it looks like they came up with a bulk compensation. If you average that out, it's about $464,000 that they're giving these people for the false arrest and other things. It amounted to 95% of the outstanding claims against the company over the false theft reports. I imagine some of the people who were seriously endangered or who were in prison for an extended period of time,

I imagine they probably are holding out for more than $464,000. Dozens of customers shared stories on social media and broadcast TV of being arrested, swatted, or stopped at border crossings after Hertz had incorrectly reported them to the authorities for stealing vehicles from them. In many of the cases, the customer had paid for and properly returned the car weeks or months prior. But in some cases, they had never rented a car at all. This guy here, who's a real estate appraiser in Colorado, his name is Drew Caesar, he learned of a warrant for his arrest in Georgia when he was stopped at the airport on his way to Mexico with his family.

He told CBS News he had never been to Georgia, nor had he rented a car from Hertz. But they said he's rented a car from us in Georgia. He was jailed for more than 24 hours. Charges were dismissed after his lawyer provided prosecutors with an alibi. Another person was arrested after Hertz incorrectly filed a theft report against him. He said, all guns were drawn on me. I was thrown to the ground. I was arrested and I was locked up for over a week. Another man told the program that he had been jailed for more than six months over an erroneous report.

And so now they're going to pay $168 million to people. We're going to take a quick break. When we come back, we're going to talk about some predictions from a European bank, Saxo Bank, 10 outrageous predictions for 2023. Stay with us. We will be right back. PIANO PLAYS You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, Saxo Bank, and I think they're a European bank. I think they're out of Denmark, if I remember correctly.

They've got some interesting predictions for 2023. A lot of them financial, of course, because they're a bank. First one I thought was interesting, gold up to $3,000 per ounce. They also talk about an un-Brexit, an EU army, national meat bans. Well, we're pretty much getting there anyway, and we're going to talk about what's going on in the Netherlands coming up here. They said, they call it their outrageous predictions because they are not doing this as an official market forecast, but just kind of their hunches looking at generalized trends.

They said they argue any belief in a return to the disinflationary pre-pandemic dynamic is impossible because we have entered into a global war economy with every major power across the world now scrambling to shore up their national security on all fronts. Whether it's in an actual military sense or due to profound supply chain, energy, and even financial insecurities. Well, stop and think about that. We've got four big problems, don't we? We could have a real war. We could have more effects from these supply chains because they locked everybody down. We'd have a lot of effects from energy because they're shutting everybody down for the climate MacGuffin. Or we could have financial insecurity because the central banks are

borrowing money and easing, pushing inflation. All four of those, of course, come from the government. They're all government-created problems. All of our big problems are government. Ronald Reagan got it right, and it used to be what conservatives understood. Government is not the solution. Government is the problem. You want war.

You want supply chains broken? You want to have financial insecurity? You want to have your energy taken away? Oh, government can do that today. And it is doing that everywhere. And yet, we continue to think that if we participate in the political process and get the right people elected in Washington, especially the president, everything will be fine.

And oh, by the way, let's not look at what's ahead. Let's look in the rear view mirror. Let's look at the last election. And all these people for the last two years, I haven't seen any real solutions for these people. Finally, Mike Lindell said, hey, just going to have paper ballots. Well, that's good. That's going to be an improvement, but that's not a real solution. If you're going to have a democracy, you've got to have an open party that's not controlled by

just two political parties. They control very carefully who gets on the ballot. They control who gets into the debates. They control speech in the public square. You're going to have to have a lot of different things change all at once to really have any hope of getting this thing fixed politically. But there are things that we can do. And we do it from the local level up. That's why it was good to talk to the John Birch Society. That's one way that you can try to understand the politicians in your local area, where they stand on issues. Will they stand to interpose these usurpations of power? Who's with you?

Who's against you? You have to find that out some way. You have to have a network of these types of things. Geese busters, geese busters. Thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin. I really appreciate that. It might be a busy time of year. I don't know when the geesebusters. Thank you very much for the tip on Rockfin. I really appreciate that. It might be a busy time of year. I don't know when the geese are migrating.

That's what he does. He lures the geese away from your property if they are becoming a nuisance, and they can become quite a nuisance. These predictions do not constitute SACSO's official market forecast, but they represent a warning against the potential misallocation of risk, they pointed out. So what are they saying about gold? That's kind of interesting.

$3,000. They say gold will rocket to $3,000 per ounce as central banks fail on inflation mandate. Well, they can't predict the exact price. Nobody can. But in general, what they're saying is the reason for that. They said 2023 is the year the market finally discovers that inflation is not temporary, right? It's transitory. I'm with the transitory people.

Well, no. It's set to remain ablaze for the foreseeable future. In 2023, gold finally finds its footing, they think, after a challenging 2022 in which many investors were left frustrated by its inability to rally even as inflation surged to a 40-year high. Central banks largely anticipate that inflation will fall back into target within a mere couple of years. And that's what's priced into the market and priced into, you know, because gold is valued in terms of these fiat currencies. That's why you see the price of gold fluctuating.

It's really a fluctuation in people's ideas about fiat currencies. Interestingly, in this projection here, they don't say anything about CBDC being brought in in 2023. And that's always been my biggest concern is CBDC. I don't know what's going to happen with inflation or the price in dollars per ounce of gold. I'm not really, I don't really care about that. It's really more what is going to be done

in terms of absolute and total control against us. And so, again, I'll just put in a plug for Tony Arterman at wise wolf dot gold. He's set up David Knight dot gold. If you want to buy from him and let him know that you're coming from me, that helps the program, but he's always helped the program in a lot of different ways. Central banks largely anticipate that inflation will fall back. And so a lot of people are buying that. But I guess, do the central banks really think that inflation is going to go away? Because they're about the biggest buyers of gold right now. I think that's the line they're feeding everybody,

but I don't think they really buy it. And as they pointed out here in their prediction, they said, well, if you can get 4% on a five-year treasury from the U.S. at a time when the five-year forward inflation rates are priced to drop below 2.5%, well, that's not real. That's what they're telling everybody. And the real inflation is 8% to 9% officially now. If you calculate it honestly, the way that it was done before they started

manipulating it even more in the 1990s, it's double that. So again, you look at this and it's just like the Chinese stats. You don't believe anything they say. You don't believe the unemployment numbers that you get from the U.S. government because they adjust them every quarter. They adjust the previous quarter. They take the unemployment figures up so that this quarter's numbers look better. And then they do the same thing the next quarter from this.

Another prediction, the EU army forces the EU down a path to full union. That's what it's always been about. You look at the pattern of this consolidation that is happening globally. It takes a pattern. First of all, they create a free trade market. So they had the European Union common market. The next step is, well, you know, we have to have some political unification with that. Next stage is the unification over a currency and then having an army. So if we would take a look at that, where are we right now? Well, globally, we've got a global market in trade, but they're not happy with that. They want to have some more political connections. But the way they're going to achieve unification is going to be through economic means. That's why the globalists who want to

take over the world at Davos call themselves the World Economic Forum. The Nazis tried twice to do it by guns, and then they caught on, the way we do this is economically that's worked for the british and for the americans let's do it through the banks the world economic forum so you get everybody on these cbdcs you unify the cbdcs and then you've got to have some way to make money you've got to have a global problem for a global tax that's the carbon. And then you get your army. Once you've got your money, now you've got your army that's out there. Right now, they're kind of in a little bit of a shaky position because

you've got the UN. The UN and Davos unified, and we're going to talk about that with the tri-state situation. They unified back in 2015-16. They had the same agenda. They went from sometime in the 21st century, we're going to pack everybody into the cities,

and UN Agenda 21, sometime in the 21st century. Then they got very specific in 2015. They said by 2030, this is going to happen. Smart cities. They started talking about smart cities then. They started talking about the Great Reset, where you're going to own nothing. They started talking about the UN 2030 Agenda for for sustainability and all the rest of the stuff.

All that happened at the same time. The two of them came together. The UN provides this kind of legislative forum where they can put together their big goals and that type of thing, but they need to have an executive branch that's going to have the energy and an executive. That's what world economic forum and Klaus Schwab have done. And they also need to have a way to finance it. And since they don't have their global tax of carbon credits and things like that in place, they have to have the corporations. And they're going to promise them that they're going to reserve them

a special place at the table. And so they become, for right now, the corporations provide the economic money that they will eventually get from a global tax that will be based on climate nonsense. Another projection here, a country agrees to ban all meat production by 2030. Will that be the Netherlands?

We'll talk about that as you see one of the real reasons why they're doing this. Of course, it's not for the environment. It's not to save people from nitrogen. It's to turn essentially the entire country into a city like MBS in Saudi Arabia wants to do with the line, except they're in a circle and it's a giant megalopolis that's there. But they also talk about things about an un-Brexit, widespread price controls to cap the official inflation. Of course, price controls have never, ever worked. They were never able to whip inflation now, and they will always fail.

So we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we are going to talk about the tri-state city. Their big plan. We'll be right back. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.

And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they have everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.

Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com All right, welcome back. We're going to talk about the tri-state stuff, but I do want to tell Christina, who's been a longtime supporter of ours. She sent some money on Cash App, and she said,

please pray for me and my new baby, Ava. Well, we are, and I hope everybody will. A long-term supporter, wish the best for you, Christina, and your new baby, Ava. Let's talk, though, about what is happening with the megacities, and a good example of it in the Netherlands. And as a lead- up to that, let me give you a picture of what they really want from us, because they want to essentially take away all of our meat. They're now talking about this. For the longest time, they would give these general goals and things like that. But now they've come up with very specific allowances for each individual. This is coming from C40 cities. This is a global network of now 97 cities

that are 100% on board with this climate dictatorship. This is really where all of this stuff from the pandemic to the climate lockdowns, this is where this is all headed. This is what this is all about. The agenda 21, the UN 2030 agenda, C40 cities, smart cities,

all of this stuff. And so they've now come up the people that they pay, that they give research grants to and that type of thing. These people have now come up with how much each individual should be allowed in terms of food, clothing, and transportation. And I think as strange as this, this is out of New York city. This is somebody come along. They're speaking.

I don't know what neighborhood this is in, but they're speaking in Spanish and they come up to a guy who is roasting rats on a spit. Look at this. You made it? You made it? They're laughing about it. You can say, I mean, they've, you know, shaved the rats and got three of them and they're big.

And those are really big rats. And they're turning them on a spit, barbecuing them. So you just get your rat on a stick right there. That's one way. You know, they're talking about how they needed a rat czar in New York City. Well, that's one thing you can do with the rats. You can recycle them, sell them for food. And we may be grateful to get something like that if we don't stop these people.

So carbon trading is the economic platform, generate government income and to generate it globally for a global government. Yeah. My son says, if you get tired of bugs, you can splurge on rats. Yeah. For Thanksgiving. That'd be, you know, uh, yeah, we're going to what's what's for dinner. Well, you know, what's for dinner? Well, you know, we got a special turkey.

No, no, we got some Razzleberry dressing and a rat on a stick. And those rats are as big as, bigger than some chickens I've seen, I think. Anyway, this is all about global governance and how to finance it, really. And notice I said global governance. It was a guy that I worked with when we were coming after the environmental stuff, the renewable energy mandates, and Michael Mann, who was hiding the data that he claimed, showed that there was a correlation between CO2 and an increase in temperature

and all the rest of the stuff, the hockey stick that Al Gore used. Chris Horn was a correlation between CO2 and an increase in temperature and all the rest of stuff, the hockey stick that Al Gore used. Chris Horn was a lawyer. He'd argued before the Supreme Court stuff. And he would always say, don't talk about global government. Talk about global governance. Because it's going to be done with corporations. And he's right. It really is a fascist combination of governments and corporations.

And it is a little bit more distributed like that. And so they need to have some way they can generate income. So they come up with this carbon tax and carbon trading. It's like the medieval indulgences that were instituted by a pope and eventually resulted in the Reformation because people were angry that they would have to pay in advance mainly to keep their business open in a holiday. And they'd made virtually every day a holy day, a holiday. Well, if you want to open up on a holy day, a holiday, now you've got to pay in advance, pay an indulgence.

Well, that's what these people are doing. Everything that you do, using energy, breathing, exhaling, any of this stuff, eating, traveling, all of that is a sin. And you have to pay these global corporations and governments, you have to pay them for that syntax, and you have to do it as you're doing it or in advance. At the end of the financial lane, we will arrive at a world with CBDCs, where they will have instant control over spending and instant taxing on your activities. So now they've got people who are quantifying the specifics for each of us as individuals. And this article that is on conservative treehouse, this article shows a document from C40 cities where they break down all of these different things. Your resource allocation is part of your consumption intervention

consideration, where the amount of carbon emission your consumption drives is what determines the goal for your future allocation. They talk about it as a consumption intervention. This is one of the things that liberals love to do. They love to say, well, you know, this guy, he's got a problem with drugs or something. We're going to have to do an intervention. He's got a problem with anger. We're going to have to do an intervention. He's got a problem with anger, we're going to have to do an intervention. You got a problem with eating food and traveling and even clothing, we're going to have to do an intervention, a climate intervention. So this document from this organization, C40 Cities. Let's start with meat. And each one of these things, they have a progressive target to have by 2030. And then they have an ambitious target. Well, they want to

keep you down with their target, which they don't think is really aggressive, not really ambitious. Their target for the amount of meat per person per year, 16 kilograms. We're talking about, you know, about 35 pounds of meat a year. A year. A year. But their ambitious target is zero kilograms of meat per year. Just completely cut meat out of your diet. And I'm sure that the progressives, I guess when they talk about the progressive target for 2030

and the ambitious target for 2030, one of those would be what the progressives who run us, people like Hillary Clinton, they would get their 35 pounds of flesh. We would get their 35 pounds of flesh. We would get zero because we're the ambitious target. You know, y'all can't have air conditioning. We'd all die if y'all had air conditioning. So you can't have that, that type of thing.

When it comes to dairy consumption, their progressive target is 90 kilograms of milk a year, but their ambitious target is that you have no milk, no milk at all ever again. You want a future where there's no meat, where there's no milk? Well, then just sit back and watch sports and movies and don't get involved in all this,

and that's where they're going to take us. If you don't get involved, that's what they're going to do to us. If you don't spread the word, this is what these people are going to do. They're openly putting it out. This is 97 cities. 97 of the biggest cities in the world are saying, yeah, we need to shut all meat and all dairy to everybody forever. Never again.

There's a growing consensus based on compelling evidence that the world is facing a climate crisis. They say, yeah, a growing consensus and it's a, and there's compelling evidence. Well, fine,

show it to us. Like I said, 20 years ago, involved in a lawsuit, say, show me the data. You know, you crafted public policy. You were doing this at a university. You were doing it on university time, on a university email. And you were writing emails to people in the climate center at East Anglia University in the UK.

And you guys were saying, hey, our models don't work. We've got to hide the decline. So what did you do to hide the decline? Well, I'm not going to show you my data. They just hid all the data, and they got away with it. It's a sign of fraud, just like we're seeing right now with all the facts. No, we can't see the data for 60, 70 years. No.

Except in that case, at least, we had a judge who did the right thing. So they say there's a growing consensus. There is compelling evidence that they can't show you. That the world is facing a climate crisis and rapid action is a necessity. We have no time to think about this. We just got to do it at warp speed. I mean, that's the biggest fraud. I mean, were we all born yesterday?

You know, when you got some slick salesman who's trying to sell you something, but I can't really show you that. No, no, just trust me. You know, we've got some experts talking about this and, um, uh, yeah, I can't really show that to you, but you know what? It's right now. You got to make your decision and buy it right now, or it's gone. And they keep doing that over and over again.

How many times are going to fall for that? Austin McGee, thank you very much. That's very generous. I appreciate that very much. In honor of Mr. Knight dropping Freedom Nuggets for the last thousand days and inspired by the couple that tip matched a couple of weeks ago, I'm going to tip match to a thousand. Wow.

Thank you very much. I really do appreciate that on Rockfin. Thank you very much, Austin. That is really, really generous. Thank you. And this is a difficult time of year and things have been slow for us. I understand it's Christmas time, it's holidays, and I understand there's a lot of economic uncertainty. I would be better off if I didn't tell you about that. Yeah, it's great. Everything's going to be wonderful. That's what people want to hear. I'm sure that a lot of people would love to hear that news.

But things are going to be tough. They really are. And so I really do appreciate that. That is very generous. Thank you. Increasingly, all options are required, they said. We can't have a choice between one option and the other. That's no longer compatible

with how rapid and significant these emission reductions must be. So we've got to do everything. All hands on deck, all options, all at once are required. So you can see, they don't want you to have any meat, no dairy. Take it out

completely. Rat on a stick will be a delicacy. Delicacy. So yeah, let's take a look at clothing, right? They've taken away your meat and your milk. So let's take a look at clothing. Well, they want to reduce, the goal is to reduce the number of clothing and textile items each year. So their progressive target is that you could buy eight new clothing items per person per year. Does that include a mask? It's not a fashion accessory.

I mean, have I burned one of my credits if I buy a cloth mask? But the ambitious target is that you will have three new clothing items per person per year. This is medieval level slavery. When you have a situation where if they would stop the games with energy, we'd have unlimited amounts of energy. And I'm not just talking about what they like to call fossil fuel. You and I both know they've shut down a lot of other alternative energy sources because they don't want them. That was done for the oil people. And now the green people want to shut down the oil and they want us to go back into the dark ages, literal dark ages. You get three new clothing items per person per year. This is going to roll out to everything. How many computers are they going to, uh, you know,

not computers, but how many electronic devices are they going to allow you to have? How many books even will they allow you to have? Because all these things take energy and you can't have anything that requires energy. They're literally going to take us back to the dark ages and they will literally come around with cops and hassle you if you're burning wood. You can't burn that. The planet will die if you burn wood. And by the way, where did you get that? Did you get that from the King's Forest?

We're back to the times of Robin Hood, that type of stuff. So, yeah, three new clothing items per person per year. Let's take a look at vehicles. They're very explicit about that. Again, this group is C40, 97 of the biggest cities coming together. In the transportation sector, the ambitious goal is to remove all private vehicles. Of course. This has been the goal of these radical leftist Marxists from the the time i was in high school the first earth day

you know the people that i identified as hippies i was always conservative uh and and uh you know they they were running around so we're gonna ban all cars it's like nah not gonna happen but if we don't stop these people, they will. And this document here from conservative treehouse, it really is like the Twitter files. You know, we've known all this stuff forever. I go back to the very first earth day, ban all cars, ban all parking lots, you know, cities are wonderful. Cars are evil and all the rest of this stuff. From the very beginning, we've known all of this. This is like the Twitter files where we've told you about this stuff for decades,

and now we've got the documents from them, and not being reported on by mainstream media, not by most of the media. We've got the documents, we've got the details. Will people believe it and stop it? Let's take a look at the next thing then. So what do they want in terms of private vehicles? None. No private vehicles.

Now, if they go instead of the ambitious target, if they ease off a little bit, the progressive target is that by 2030, when they have their new society in place, again, they have to destroy our society completely and then put in their new society in place. Again, they have to destroy our society completely and then put in their new rules by 2030. That's why we're going through a period of time where they're going to come after us very, very aggressively. And this is one of the reasons why they say they've got to do this rapidly. They don't have to do it rapidly because we've got some kind of a climate crisis. They got to do it rapidly because they got to have this stuff in there by that date.

That's how they're going to be judged whether or not they're successful or not. And that's going to determine their position in the new society, just like you saw Rostovic saying, well, you know, we're going to get in. I'm going to get into NATO. Zelensky and I, we're going to be bigwigs in NATO. But it's going to require that everybody else in this country die. Yeah, well, Ukraine is going to be havoced. It's going to be devastated. But the good news is that Zelensky and I are going to get into NATO. That's what these people are doing. That's why they're so manic

about complying with this goal. And they're very serious about this. They've got a deadline, a specific deadline. They've worked out a lot of details. No private vehicles is what they want. But if they back down from it a little bit, 190 vehicles per 1,000 people. And so what do we have right now? We've got in the United States, we've got slightly over one, on average, slightly over one car per person. So you're going to have gone down conservatively from about a thousand cars

per thousand people, let's say, to 190. That's their sloppy one, their progressive target, but they really want to get you down to zero. But it's also interesting because when we talk about 190 vehicles per 1000 people, I've always said, you know, look, there's a transitional issue here. They don't want any private vehicles, but what they'll do is they'll tell you that you can't have anything unless it's an electric vehicle that charges off the grid. They don't want to have anything else. They don't want to have a hydrogen electric vehicle, nothing like that.

So they can't support it. uh, they can't support it. They know they can't support it. They're already telling people in Switzerland, as well as in California that don't charge your cars. We're already stretched on the grid. We've destroyed so much grid capacity here, uh, sanctioned the fuel sources. We can't support it. So don't charge your electric vehicle.

They might be able to support 190 electric vehicles for the grid. I seriously doubt they could even support that many in that period of time. I don't think they could build it out. Austin McGee, thank you very much. Tip $2. If we don't hit 1,000 a day,

I'll go again tomorrow until we do. Well, thank you very much. So my son said that people may not know about the tip matching because Austin McGee's tips and comments don't seem to be showing up on Rockfin's live chat. Okay, so I'll mention it again. Austin McGee has generously offered to match any contributions up to $1,000 dollars today so thank you very much

and say we'll do it tomorrow if we don't get to that point thank you very much awesome appreciate that before we get into the tri-state cities in the netherlands and show you what one example of this stuff looks like everybody's seen the line it looks like a science fiction dystopian thing i mean very high quality production. Spent a lot of money on the production. And everybody sees it and says, yeah, I'd rather die than live there. Everybody that I know.

It's like a prison. Like a prison out in the middle of the desert. You're not going to get any. How many times have you seen science fiction things where you've got this city where, you know, they try to placate people with it, but everybody lives in a tiny apartment. And if you try to get out of that thing, you know, it's nothing but desert out there. And that's what is there.

Thank you very much, Timothy. Appreciate that. Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. Thank you very much. So airline travel. Let's talk about that. Citizens will be permitted one flight less than 930 miles every three years, one plane flight every three years,

but less than 930 miles. Oh, that's not going to get you anywhere in the United States. Uh, we lived out and even get us out of Texas. He trapped in Texas forever. Um, no one flight. And, um,

you think that's not coming? We've already had Macron just say, um, and I think, I can't remember. It's 300 miles of 300 kilometers. If you're going to take a trip less than, because that number is going to change.

That's just a placeholder for starters right now. But if you're going to take a flight less than, let's say, 300 kilometers, we're not going to allow that. You're going to have to go by train. No flights less than 300 kilometers. Well, then what they do is they bump it up and then, you know, make that, um, um, that number get bigger and bigger until it pretty much disappears. And then they say, well, you can't travel except once every three years, once every three years.

Um, so that is their ambitious target. The slightly less ambitious target would be one short haul return flight every two years. Oh, not to go every three years. They want to get rid of people being able to fly. And then from their abstract, they say the wide range of action required to achieve a 1.5 degrees centigrade scenario leaves little room for delay over the coming decade. We've got to move fast because we've got that 2030 deadline to appease our masters here. Deployment of carbon capture and storage, particularly in industries that emit direct emissions and carbon pricing mechanisms

that can underpin actions across entire economies and markets. And it's going to be global. Even deeper paradigm shifts may be relevant, such as adopting more useful measures of societal development than just economic growth. Yeah, we won't measure the economy. We won't measure because they're going to take everything away from you. Why would they measure economic growth if you're going to own nothing?

That becomes a meaningless metric. So I guess the only meaningful metric is how much power they have or how many people they allow. In practice, no one city or nation, this is these cities talking, 97 of the biggest cities, the organization C40. No one city or nation will follow the exact same emissions reduction pathway, but this report provides directions on the type, the scale, and the time scale of policies that must be implemented.

These are the allocations that we can expect to see in the future. The enforcement mechanisms will likely vary on government power, writes the conservative treehouse, amid the various nations. It will be based, however, on successful results from the COVID passport beta tests, from gateways and permissions. Some form of digital currency will likely be a part of the compliance process for the carbon allocation as outlined. So that brings us to what one of these cities in particular looks like.

And I want to play for you a video that's been put together by farmers who understand what this is about. Now, you're going to hear a lot of music. I'm going to kind of narrate this, but the visuals are very, very powerful. It begins by showing you large areas of very, very productive rural farmland in the Netherlands, some of the most productive farmland you're going to find in Europe for sure. And then it shows you their plans for giant city. And then it shows you the resistance from these farmers. And we better do something about it. Now time is getting very short. We're about to click over to 2023.

And by 2030, they want to have everybody locked away in this stuff. Thanks for watching! All right, there's Klaus Schwab and Mark Ruta. Shaking hands, they love each other. Oh, Ursula von der Leyen. Yeah, there you go. All the usual villains here. Now here's the picture. Here's the picture of what they want to do with the Tri-Cities, Tri-State City. And here are the farmers with their convoys, their big convoys of tractors.

I think the people in the Netherlands better stand with those farmers or they're going to starve. They'll be lucky if they eat rat on a stick in these cities. That'll be a luxury because you won't be allowed to have any meat. More pictures of truckers and the rest of the same finishes out with a massive protest of truckers. Great vigils right here. Production. Oh, look. Police taking shots at him. Pointing guns at cars. Yeah. It's going to get serious, folks. Look at that. He shows the bullet hole in his

truck. Put his finger in it. And it nearly went through the window of his cab. A lot of people standing up there in support of those farmers. Look at that. Amazing. Well, it's going to come down to it.

Get ready for it. Get ready. Together we rise, divided we fall. A great video production showing what is coming from these people, a tri-state super city instead of farmers in the Netherlands. Now this came out, um, this summer, uh, this freedom activists, Willem Ingel from the Netherlands. He's been in a lot of different programs. Most recently he was on with Jordan Peterson. I think somebody picked that up and sent that to me, which got me on the trail of this.

I had not heard of the tri-state super city in the Netherlands. I've seen what they're planning in places in America. In Texas, for example, they want to, if you look at Texas, you've got Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, stacked from north to south along the interstate that's there. And they see these cities as growing together into a megalopolis, right? And then they want to connect Dallas to Houston with a high-speed rail because Houston will be another big city. So there'll be two giant megacities in Texas and connected with high-speed rail at various points. And so we've talked about that in the past, being there in Texas.

But this is one that was new to me. And this actually, planning on this goes back very early to right after this merger between agendas from the UN and from the World Economic Forum, as they started getting specific and said 2030. That's when it changed from UN Agenda 21 to the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainability. So that kicked in around that time, and they started putting these plans together and putting them out. I found stuff going back to 2016 about this stuff.

So it happened right after they came together. Freedom activist Willem Ingel says for him it's clear that these developments, of course, will not be limited to the Netherlands. I talked about how it's going to be in Texas. Under the guise of climate protection, the way to get there seems to be through forced expropriation. How are they going to get people to move into the cities? How are they going to get everybody? We've seen for years, you know, going back to the early 2000s, the UN Agenda 21, they showed the pictures of how they're going to pack everybody in the cities and how the

rural areas would be totally unoccupied. It's like, well, how are you going to do that? Well, you see how they're going to do it now in the Netherlands. Netherlands is taking the lead in terms of expropriating the property from the farmers. He claims the Dutch government is not seeking to eliminate a third of its farms for environmental reasons. No. Instead, it is about the construction of a tri-state city, a megalopolis with a population of about 45 million and extending into some areas of Germany and Belgium. That's why they call it the tri-state.

It's got nothing to do with the official narrative of reducing nitrogen. That's a made up thing. It's not a problem. You know, find something that is ubiquitous and say, we got to ban it. And in order to ban it, we got to take everything away from you. Yeah. People getting colds and flus. Oh, well, okay. Well, let's make it into a super pandemic bug, a super flu. Now we got to take everything away from you to stop, make sure nobody's got sniffles. We got to take everything away from you to make sure that nobody's got any nitrogen. The so-called nitrogen crisis, he says, is fictional.

It's purely political. No human lives are at stake. They can't prove that this is even a threat to the environment. And if it were a threat, would there be other things that you could do besides confiscating the farms and shutting down all food production, dairy production, meat production, the rest of the stuff? No, of course not. You're doing this because you've got a different agenda. And it's only going to be one way.

We're going to take private cars. Well, yeah, we're going to let you have private cars, but you've got to have them charged through the grid. Well, we don't have grid capacity. That's how this works. They do it iteratively with disruption from the inside. Indeed, a group of institutional investors in the Netherlands, led by Peter Savalberg, have joined forces to present the Netherlands

plus parts of Belgium and Germany as a single city and a network called the Tri-State City. Let me show you a screenshot of that. Here is overall, this is Europe. And you can see there is they've got it colored population densities. And so in this map here, well, they got the red areas that are predominantly urban regions, rural populations, less than 20% of the total population. Then they have yellow, which is intermediate regions. They have green, which is predominantly rural regions. And then they have a square drawn around the tri-state city.

And it's already, you know, they're planning for this thing to be very, very densely populated. But here's another picture of it where you can kind of see how it goes down into Antwerp and Belgium. Goes over into some German cities there. picture of it where you can kind of see how it goes down into Antwerp and Belgium, um, goes over into, uh, some German cities there. Uh, and, um, again, population density, this is what they're planning on. Um, you know, uh, 300 inhabitants per square kilometer. Um, so, you know, down to less than 50 inhabitants per square kilometer. And I'm not sure if that is a picture of where they are right now or where they want to be. But it's already a very high concentration of people.

That's one of the reasons why they feel like they can purge the remaining areas of farmland, confiscate them, kick the farmers off the land, and make it fully urban. And who are the people behind this? Well, here is the symbol of the UN, the Sustainable Development Goals. And here are their goals. Okay, again, you understand that the UN 2030 agenda is for sustainable development. So these are their 17 sustainable goals. No poverty. Oh, yeah, it's going to be utopia.

There'll be zero hunger, even though they're going to cut off your food sources. They're going to have you filled up with bugs, I guess. Three, good health and well-being. All this stuff is just so good. Quality education. Gender equality. Oh, now we're starting to see where this stuff is coming from, right?

Coming from the globalists from the UN as part of it. Clean water and sanitation, affordable, clean energy, decent work and economic growth and industry and infrastructure, reduced inequalities. There you go. There's the diversity, equality, inclusivity stuff. Sustainable communities, responsible consumption and production, climate action, life below water. Maybe that's why they picked the Netherlands. Maybe they got everybody in the cities.

Maybe they knocked the dikes down and fled the place. Call it Atlantis or something. Life on land, life underwater peace justice and strong institutions and partnerships for the goals yeah when you look at this kind of stuff i mean it is nebulous utopian stuff and they always sell you the dystopian future with a utopian marketing plan. And then finally, this is the overall picture as they see connectography, mapping the future of global civilizations and how they're going to concentrate them in various places. And all of this pointing again back to this large area here, 45 million people. It is pretty amazing how bold it is and how bold they are. They said one of the

ways that they're selling, listen to how they sell this. The supporters of the project, these developers, these wealthy individuals who are property developers, pension funds, banks, they say Dutch cities are too small to compete in what it calls the battle of the cities in which mega cities will compete for investment and talent. What does that mean? I mean, what kind of hunger game competition is this when in order to compete, you have no meat, no dairy products, no cars, no travel. Oh, great. Who's competing? These guys are. By treating the Netherlands as an urbanized delta with 17 million inhabitants,

the project supporters say that it is creating a solid player in this battle of the titans. Our city marketing is too fragmented and inefficient, says the website. It's about how Dutch companies present themselves to companies such as Apple or big Chinese firms, says the Benelux director. And it said also, you know, we've got the Holland metropole. That will include Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Utrecht, if I'm pronouncing that correctly, and The Hague. So just like we talked about in Texas, they make one mega city out of Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio, then another one with Houston. That's what they're saying. We've got the Holland Metropole. We're going to have this tri-state city. This is a prescription for a nightmare, folks.

Absolutely a nightmare. Let me pause here a second because I'm getting behind in the people who have left tips. Thank you very much. And again, we have a very generous offer, and you can't see the comments on Rockfin, but they offered to match up to $1,000. I really do appreciate that. Rescue Dog 66, thank you very much for the tip. Thank you for always fighting the good fight.

God bless. Well, thank you very much. Junk Silver, thank you. Angus Mustang, thank you very much. These smart cities, he says, will be like the cities in Soylent Green. Yes. And what was the other one um the Ridley Scott movie um replicants all the rest of this stuff Blade Runner thank you that's

my son as my memory fades I've got him here to help me um what was that thing in the name of that thing uh but name of that thing? Uh, but anyway, yeah, that's what it's going to be like. Definitely. Bianca Scanlon. Thank you very much.

She says that Merry Christmas, David, listening to you has changed my life. Oh, that's nice. I appreciate it. My family and I left New York city a year ago. Good.

Uh, we are living in free North Idaho. Good for you. Good for you. We are forever grateful for your integrity. Encourage me. I also suggest a David Knight university t-shirt. And Free North Idaho, good for you, good for you. We are forever grateful for your integrity and courage. May I also suggest a David Knight University t-shirt? It's a school I want to send my kids to.

Well, thank you. That's really kind. Yuri Jenkins, thank you very much for the tip. He says, many blessings to you and your family, David. Also, blessings to Austin for matching these tips. Yes, thank you very much. And Guard Goldsmith, I missed Greg Talent up Yes. Thank you very much. And a guard goal Smith. Um,

can you, I missed a Greg talent up there. Thank you very much. Appreciate that. Greg, um, guard goal Smith. Uh,

he says, I'm in the city of Austin might've become a moral wasteland, but now I have a new Austin to appreciate. It was a matching these contributions on rock man. Thank you. Uh, great show. Great people. Thank you, A great show. Great people.

Thank you, guard. Thank you, guard. I appreciate it. And guard is starting. As he pointed out, he's doing a couple of trial runs.

He's going to be on rock fan as well. He understands what is going on. Guard has got such an amazing background. So many different things that he's done from author screenwriter, and he's been doing history and politics for a very long time. As we've got a comprehensive understanding. Uh, so check out his rock fan channel. He's got a sub stack as well.

Um, Carlos Rex, thank you very much for the tip conservative. Thank you. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Uh, one more of these should do it. Austin. Thank you very much. Uh, Tina and Mike, thank you very much for the tip and austin mcgee

again uh leaving a tip um uh to do the matching thank you so much austin i cannot thank you enough thank you uh i've got just a little bit more here to say about the um oh wow the total on rock fan is now a thousand dollars well thank you very much, all of you. I appreciate that. So my son just left there. One last thing. I saw this, the drudge report. And it was sold like wristwatches for cows.

For cows. So they said, using smart technology to monitor the health, reproductivity, location, and environmental conditions of cattle can help with food safety and supply chain efficiency. So researchers have now published in the journal iScience, they said they've designed a wearable smart device for cows that captures the kinetic energy created by even their smallest movement. But wait a minute, there's not going to be any cows. What cattle are they talking about?

I think you and I. They're saying that for the cows, they measure the amount of exercise, the reproductive cycles, the disease, their religious and political affiliations. Oh, no, I'm sorry. That's coming for you. The team's smart ranch design involves cows wearing small sensory devices around their ankles and necks that are powered by everything the cows do as they go about their regular activities. There's a tremendous amount of kinetic energy that can be harvested in cattle's daily movements. Yeah, I know you ever

drive by these cows. They don't move a whole lot. You drive down the fields, I mean, they're sitting there, they're eating, standing and eating or laying down every time I see them. So, yeah, they're not real active. I mean, they're not out there running around like a dog or something, chasing a ball. But they can harvest that. They said, our kinetic energy harvester specially harvests the kinetic energy of weak motion. And it says, yeah, they've also tested the device on humans. How about that?

Isn't that special? And they found that a light jog was enough to power temperature measurement in the device. The researchers see future applications in smart homes and construction of human wireless sensor networks. There you go. You know, we're back to the matrix. You already had a paper come out not too long ago where Microsoft is saying, yeah, you know, we can use the movements of people to do this and that, you know, and capture their energy.

Oh, they're going to harvest everything about us because we will be their cattle we will be their eloy you know to go to hg wells um dystopian science fiction thing because that's where we are right now um uh austin mcgee said i meant i'll match a thousand dollars from me it's my main tie that i've been sending saving to send real money to send to the man that returned me to crime. Well, that's really nice. That's what I really appreciate. Thank you for letting me know that. I'll let him decide how he can use it best. Thank you very much. Geesebusters, Geesebusters. Thank you for that. And he writes, free geese control for Austin. Thank you, all of you. I can't say enough ard bow thank you very much thanks to the best news source anywhere

Alexander thank you for the tip he says let's do 2,000 for a thousand days Alan Vale thank you very much and he says thank you no thank you all of you very much and Patrick s peace and love night family and the chat group yeah we do have a good community there on uh on rock fit very good community uh we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back stay with us Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show all right i got a couple of articles here. And I want to talk about this. It just keeps coming up.

I said, you know, I hadn't seen anybody really make an excuse to say that Trump was not threatening to suspend the Constitution. You know, what do we do? We get rid of all rules and regulations and even the Constitution. Get me back in office. That's the way I read it. That's the way everybody seemed to read it except for Trump supporters. As I said, Breitbart reported it that way. And yet you had 15,000 comments on Breitbart and pretty much all these people

were saying, no, he, you know, uh, we, we should get him back in. And you see comments like, uh, this one right here. Uh, if I can find it. Yeah. Yeah. This gives a new twist to taking Trump seriously, but not literally. We know what he meant. And it is damn serious, they said. Oh, okay.

Yeah. So don't look at what he does. Don't look at what he says. We know he's on our side. We know that he's our special agent on the inside. And even though it looks like he's saying and doing something that would betray us or the Constitution, he's just playing that game with the other people. He's lying to them. He's not betraying us. He's not lying to us.

It's just those other people. He's playing 4G chess. And so this is where they are. Now, not lying to us. It's just those other people. He's playing 4G chess. And so this is where they are. Now, I saw another article. This came from Mark Fitzgibbons at American Thinker. And this is the second writer I've seen besides Infowars. And there's an unattributed Infowars. I don't know which writer put it up. It just said Infowars in general that I read to you yesterday. Well, I said, oh, this is all just totally fake news. There's no way that Trump, and I was like, are you kidding

me? After a thousand days of this stuff, you're still playing this game, this QAnon type of gaslighting of your own people? Because as I said, Matt Taibbi got it exactly right when he was talking about the mainstream media. He said, you know, outlets like CNN and MSNBC or Fox, you think of them, he says, they're not doing news anymore. They're hunting for demographics. And so they're going to tell the people what they want to hear. They'll make it sensational. They'll put in false details if necessary,

but they're going to tell people what they want to hear, and they're hunting for demographics. And so this person says, well, look at this. CNN said, Trump calls for the termination of the Constitution and truth social. And at Axios, they said, a few hours ago, the leader of the Republican Party, Donald Trump, called for destroying the Constitution and making himself a dictator. They reported that as a tweet from a Democrat politician. Well, again, you can read it yourself and you can see what it says. I mean, I don't know. Should we take a president literally? I understand that Biden and Trump are kind of idiots and placeholders and the rest of this stuff. You should definitely take them seriously, and you should understand the direction that they want to head, just as we were talking about Biden saying,

well, I want to get rid of all semi-automatic weapons. Well, you know, he wants to get rid of all guns. That's where he wants to go. And you know that Trump wants to do whatever he can to get back into office, anything. So just, that's your serious track to keep there. But this person at American Thinker, Mark Fitzgibbons, says the predisposed anti-Trump crowd chose to read, allow for,

and let me read the quote again, the quote from Trump in question. A massive fraud of this type of magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the constitution. Our great founders did not want and would not condone false and fraudulent elections.

So he said as well, if you are an anti-Trumper, you're going to read this as if allowed for advocates the termination of laws governing elections well i'd ask why is it then that just not just anti-trumpers but even the people who supported trump in the comments understand that yeah let's do that let's let's do whatever it takes and let's give him six years and all the rest of this stuff, right? Forget about all the rules. This resets everything.

These people are as dangerous as a globalist. They want a great reset. They want a civil war. They want to break people into groups that fight against each other. That is not the path to get this done. That's what they want you to do. And that's what they're using Trump to do. But, of course, if I say that, I suffer from Trump delusion syndrome, derangement syndrome.

They are not suffering from Trump derangement syndrome, are they? Now, he said another way that you could read this is that allow for is to make something possible. So reading Trump's comment in that context brings a much different meaning to his social media posts. Yes, of course, if you much different meaning to his social media posts. Yes, of course, if you change the meaning of allow, it would. But when he talks about context, is this guy a writer? Because context is what the message says.

It's not, let's change the definition of allow. And even Trump didn't say, you know, what I meant by allow was this. No, he doesn't say that. And if you look at the context, what is he saying there? In context, he talks about the massive fraud and he says, what do we do about this? Well, we terminate rules and regulations and constitutes. He's offering that as a follow-up.

This kind of massive fraud allows for this, right? That's the way I see it. Now, maybe you see it differently. I would say this. I had a pastor once joke. He said a guy came to him, and he said, well, you know, I think, even though I've become a Christian, I think I can still steal. I said, where do you get that from? He said this passage here, let those who stole steal no more, but work with your hands. Now he says there's no punctuation in the original Greek, right? So if you put the period in a different place, it says, let those who stole steal, period. No more work with your hands.

That's the way I see this. I mean, you can play with language any way you want, but I'm telling you in the context of that message and in the context of Donald Trump himself, everybody knows what he was saying there. Now he tried to pull this thing back, but everybody knows what he had to say. Not a question about it. Has American thinker thought about the last 1,000 days? Here's the big context, okay? You can talk about the context of Trump's behavior.

You can talk about the context to stop the steal and all the rest of the stuff in January the 6th. But you need to talk about the context of what has happened for the last 1,000 days. If you don't think that Trump would suspend the Constitution to get what he wants, you haven't been paying attention to the executive order for the state of emergency that set up all, that activated all this stuff that they planned and rehearsed. Just like they're planning and rehearsing these UN 2030 agenda cities and all the rest of the stuff.

They've got to have something to trigger it, and they've got to have somebody on the inside that is going to activate it. That's what he did. You don't think he's going to betray us with the Constitution? He's done it for a thousand days, and you still don't understand what's going on. Now, here's another one. Al Mohler, this is a guy who, big fan of Trump, big fan of the Trump warp speed stuff. He's a pastor. He teaches at seminary, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, but the bottom line is, is he parses text professionally, right? That's the bottom line.

He has absolutely no doubts as to the obvious meaning of this passage here. He says, you know, well, I can't support this kind of reckless, irresponsible behavior, contradiction of the Constitution of the United States, the presidential oath of office. This is a form of recklessness incompatible with serving as President of the United States, he says. Well, you know, it is reckless if you carelessly communicate with people, isn't it? Isn't that kind of a disqualifying thing? But I think it's also reckless and disqualifying if you shut down our country with an executive order declaring a state of emergency. Travis Gold, thank you very much for the tip.

Well, that's really nice. He says, you're amazing. Thank you. I don't even mind the talk of Christ. I'm secure in my Jewish faith. And after all, Christians are just Jews that are a wee bit confused. Thanks for the truth, David. Well, we're following a Jew, that's for sure.

And thank you, Austin. Appreciate that. Again, Austin is matching tips on Rockfin today. Thank you very much, Austin McGee. And thank you, Travis. Appreciate that. Another drone attack has hit another air base inside Russian territory.

We're going to talk about that when we come back. I'm going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Stay with us. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, as I said, we've now had, I think it's now, unless something else has happened this morning that I haven't seen, we've had at least three drone strikes and deep inside Russian territory. And the Americans are saying, well, we deliberately disabled the, took out some of the range for these things. And we have told them that they can't do it. They promised to not

do that. And I'm sure nobody went in and took off the governors either. They just keep ramping this thing up because that's always been one of the things that could be a trigger. You know, if the Americans give them weapons to directly attack deep inside Russia. And, of course, it already has escalated things. Tuesday's attack targeted an airfield that's about 80 miles from the Ukrainian border. It caused a nearby oil tank to catch fire. The attacks have hit targets hundreds of miles inside Russia, and those were attacks on Monday that had done that.

Later on Monday, Russia launched another massive missile barrage across Ukraine targeting energy infrastructure. So it's this kind of tit-for-tat, slow-motion escalation into a world war, which is what they all want. Russia has demonstrated that it will significantly escalate its war in Ukraine in response to attacks on its territory. Moscow didn't start launching large-scale missile attacks, strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure until after the truck bombing of the Crimean Bridge in October. By the way, Putin drove across the bridge.

They've done repairs. I don't think they're finished with all the repairs, but they got it repaired enough that you could drive across it, I guess, and drove right up as close as he's been to the war zone. The U.S. has sought assurances from Ukraine that it won't use U.S.-provided arms to target Russian territory, with an exception for Crimea. And again, it's just going step by step. A growing number, however, of Americans want Washington to press for peace in Ukraine. This is coming from the libertarianinstitute.org.

They said polling in March found that 80% of GOP-leaning respondents wanted the White House to arm Ukraine. That number declined to 64% in July and was down to 55% in the latest poll released on Sunday. Democrat Party support has also dropped, though, at a slower pace. And so if you look at this, you see that, again, it is surprising, isn't it, to see the Democrats that are pushing more for war than the Republicans are, at least what you used to see there. I think it's one of the reasons why they typically would start wars with Democrats in office, because they knew they could get the support of the Republicans, even though the other party was doing it.

But that's not holding up so much right now, certainly with the party bases. But still, there's overwhelming support. It's dropping, but not fast enough, really. It has now dropped overall, if you look at not just Republicans and Democrats, but overall. Only 48% of Americans agree with arming Ukraine indefinitely because that now appears to be what they want to do, right? We've got a cash cow and we don't really care how many people die in Ukraine. That figure of 48% is down by 10% since July. So it was 58% in July and now it's dropped below 50% of Americans who think that we should arm Ukraine indefinitely. Isn't that amazing that half of Americans think that we ought to just keep this

war going on indefinitely? That's the thing that really amazes me. Only 32% of respondents said that they want U.S. troops deployed to Ukraine. And again, a third of Americans would want troops. It's a minority, but still, a third want troops sent? Again, if you go back to your moral foundation, what is the purpose of a war? You know, Western democracies have always operated on the assumption that you don't go to war unless you're attacked. That's why FDR had to maneuver the attack. I mean, we were, for all practical purposes, we were shipping arms to Japan, and they knew it, just like we're doing now in Ukraine.

You know, the Japanese saw us at war with them, just like the Russians see us at war with them, and they were correct. There were other things that were done by the FDR administration. Apparently, as we go back and we look at some of the research and documents that people put out, indicating that they knew there was going to be an attack, that they shut things down. Only thing was that it was bigger than they thought it was going to be. And if the aircraft carriers had not been out of the harbor at that time,

we would have been in big trouble because what they mostly got were battleships, tremendous casualties. But it was a day that lived in infamy. Why? Why? Well, because even though we were technically at war, sanctions is a declaration of war, sending weapons to somebody that is actively engaged in a war

is taking sides, sending weapons to somebody that is actively engaged in a war, is taking sides, and you've already kind of entered the war in two different ways. But to take it to the next step of an actual strike, that was criminal behavior. It was seen by everybody as criminal behavior, and yet since World War II, we have argued essentially for preemptive warfare. They don't even make the case anymore. We go to war against people

who have not attacked us, people who are not a threat to us. And so the real purpose of war is defensive, if you're going to make a moral case for it. And from a moral standpoint, you want to try to limit casualties just to the people who are participating in the war. You don't want to, you know, again, the Pentagon has kind of moved back to this neutral term of collateral damage. But you didn't want to harm innocent people. It was always considered to be an act of cowardice and treachery in some of these countries where they would wear civilian clothes and they would fire from schools or mosques or whatever to give themselves cover,

hoping that you would attack their position and kill innocent people. Even they understood that was criminal. But just like when somebody breaks into your house, once the threat to you is over, you stop the war. The purpose of the war is to stop aggression. And when you become the aggressor, it is immoral and infamous. But that's not where we are right now. And the majority of Americans don't even, I mean, you know, they're making these decisions. If it dropped, if you had 58% of the people say, yeah, we'll just arm Ukraine forever. Now it's dropped to 48%. Well,

great. But they probably dropped that simply because, well, we can't do this forever. You know, from a pragmatic standpoint, moral issues are not even part of the calculus with this anymore. It's really just simply, well, what can we get away with? How can we win? And I don't really care what we do to other people, how many lives are squandered, just like Arestovich. He says he doesn't care if everybody in the country dies, as long as he and Zelensky get into the club. Europe can't count on U.S. shale to make up for Russian crude. U.S. oil production growth is slowing down. The shale revolution, as we knew it a few years ago, is no longer in full growth mode and may never return to it.

On the face of it, production looks good in the U.S. U.S. output has rebounded from a low of 9.7 million barrels per day in May of 2020 to 12.3 million barrels per day this September. This year's high is still below the pre-pandemic record of 13 million barrels per day in late 2019, but it's pretty close. I mean, what was it, 12.7? 12.3. 12.3, and it had dropped down to just above nine. Yet, oil companies are also rearranging their priorities under an administration that is much less favorable to their industry than previous ones. Returning cash to shareholders has become priority

number one, replacing growth of production. And of course, the other issue is, is that as they're shutting down production capacity, oil refining capacity, it gets to a point where it doesn't matter how much you get out of the ground. That's one of the reasons why Biden is setting up a station to export production to Europe because they're shutting down our refineries and not building anymore. So if you get more production up, it really doesn't help us domestically. If we can't refine it,

we just have to sell it to other people. Truck driver, Ron, thank you very much for the tip. He says, I'm waiting for the David Knight Christmas CD. Well, thanks. I wish I had some more time to do some more music. I really do enjoy it. I've got a lot of Christmas music I used to play over the years on piano and go back and I rearrange it in terms of doing orchestration and some things like that. So it's fun. It's a lot

of fun. It's kind of like painting, really. It's more like that than a performance. Because I spend most of my time trying to find the sound or particular instrument articulations and things like that to make it work. And then combining those things to get a particular type of color. So it's a slow, iterative process. I really don't have that much time to do stuff, but I'd like to do that someday. Wish I could.

Jeff Aldaffer, thank you very much for the tip. We really have enjoyed your insight, your firm stance on your moral compass of Christ. Well, thank you. If we don't have a moral foundation, we don't have a foundation. Kanan Demissy, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Charles Smith. Hey, Charles.

Charles helped us with a matching thing a couple of weeks ago. I think it was before Thanksgiving. I really appreciate that, Charles. Thank you very much. And I appreciate the tip again. Thank you. And Austin McGee, thank you for matching those. It keeps showing Austin McGee is thank you for, uh, matching those.

It keeps, um, it keeps showing Austin McGee is matching tips on rock fan today. So I really do appreciate that. Thank you. Thank you very much. We're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about the, um,

the pedophiles in the Biden administration. Yeah. It's, uh, it's, it's pretty amazing what they are now saying. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show you know when we look at the Biden administration and the people who are connected to it,

they're always pushing the envelope in one direction or the other. As a matter of fact, their alliance with Planned Parenthood, listen to this. This is something, it was a report that Fox News had about Bill Tavenner, executive director of the organization Planned Parenthood and their Center for Sex Education in New Jersey. He basically believes that people are sexual from birth, from birth. Isn't it interesting, you know, we see all these things about Balenciaga and all the rest. Oh, well, you know, this is just a QAnon thing and, you know, we would never do

anything like that. And yet they're open about it. You know, the Hollywood entertainment industry is open about it. The imagery is deliberately chosen to show that. But this executive from Planned Parenthood and their sex education branch says children should be indoctrinated with so-called porn literacy as part of their sex education. As Dave Chappelle said, you guys out there,

you're not pro-choice, you're anti-consequences, right? See, Planned Parenthood has pushed this kind of promiscuity and pushed it with this as well. This is what their education, sex education branch is. They want a brave new world type of environment and then tell everybody, hey, we're going to keep people distracted with sex and with drugs and then get rid of the consequences, troublesome consequences there. So according to the report from Fox News, he's had these views for years. He's quoted as saying in 2015, we have in our society an assumption of asexuality of people with intellectual disabilities.

It's a myth that's perpetuated. And really, we are all sexual beings from birth until death. From birth. And why would he say asexuality of people with intellectual disabilities? It's kind of interesting, isn't it, how people have talked about they seem to be focusing when you have these events that are being run, you know, these family LGBT events. It's like, oh, you know, kids who have emotional problems, we got a special area over here for you. A lot of people have talked about how it appears that they've focused a great deal on children who have autism. I think that's one of the things that they're talking about,

people with intellectual disabilities. Focus on them, you know, because you can probably be successful in molesting them. They don't have as much defense, perhaps. Tavener appeared to say during a 2012 interview that some erotica was useful. He says, I think that there's this yearning for information that young people have. You know, children of a certain age should be taught about pornography and sex education, he said. He said, I think that the internet is a major influence on how people learn about sexuality. There's access to erotica and pornography. That was very different for young people 30 years ago. It's certainly not as accessible, certainly not as instantaneous.

In other words, it wasn't as accessible and instantaneous. So there's now a lot of information that's useful. Yeah, that's what they've been able to create. The interviewer interrupted Tavenner and said, well, some of it is wrong. And he said, well, some of it is wrong, a lot of it is wrong, but there is good stuff out there as well. Good stuff out there as well. Good

stuff out there. These are people who put themselves out as feminists who were, you know, if you look the wrong way at a woman, that's the end of your career. We don't want women objectified and everything, and yet maybe they want to push pornography. Interesting set of contradictions, isn't it? In a 2021 interview, he said, if we talk about porn, is it going to make people want to watch it, which is the same faulty kind of premise as if we teach about condoms as something people want to have sex with? And this is the type of thing that you always heard from Hollywood.

We're not pushing the envelope. We're reflecting society. Well, that's not the case anymore. How many people in society are out there with cannibalism? No, this is... How many movies has Hollywood made about cannibalism? They're pushing it. They're really pushing it.

And they're pushing movies with incest and things like that in it. I mean, it's just, um, they're, they're pushing something that, um, and the same way the Biden administration is,

is pushing this with the people that it puts in front of you. And the whole purpose of having people that are out there on the fetish fringe, like Sam Britain, uh, people like, um, Richard divine or Levine, Rachel, he calls himself. The whole purpose of that is to get you acclimated and accustomed to it.

No longer shocked by it. We need to present opportunities, he said, for young people to think about, for example, their values. You know, let's do an opinion activity. Let's do it on the ethics of porn. And that's not to say that there's a right answer. So, you know, let me put this stuff out here, plant some ideas, and people say, you know, we can do polls. Well, you know what?

Polls can often be useful. We call them push polls. They do them at the very end of an election campaign. Let's push an idea out there to people just by asking them questions. And that's the way they do it. You know, what if you were to learn that John McCain had an interracial daughter or something like that, right? They do that at the last minute so that he can't respond to it and can't explain what his real situation is. So they push that out there as a suggestion. That's

what he would do with these polls on the ethics of porn. And then he would tell everybody, there's no right answer. There's no right or wrong. There's no morality anywhere, right? Everyone do as they please. There is no truth, except the truth that there is no truth. That is the absolute truth that the postmodernists all swear to. And that is the seminal point at which we go down this Alice in Wonderland fantasy world, where everything is up in the air and everything gets to be changed. Because there is no truth, there is no, you know, except my truth. Everybody's got a truth, even if the truths are contradictory. Well, I've got a truth. Everybody's got a truth, even if the truths are contradictory. Well, I've got a truth, you've got a truth, and even if they disagree with each other, they're both true, right?

It's unclear whether this statement indicates a change in his stance in terms of presenting pornography to children, but he says, sexuality is a part of life through all ages and stages. Babies can experience sexuality. If you leave them alone with somebody like this guy, they probably will. And he also promotes an initiative that they've got at Planned Parenthood called In Case You're Curious. In Case You're Curious is Planned Parenthood's confidential text line that answers sexual health questions for youth.

Remember that they've added a new profit center at Planned Parenthood to dispense transgender hormones and things like that, to chemically sterilize males. Isn't that nice? I mean, before they could only get paid for things that they did to females. Now they can get paid for things they do to males as well. And perhaps they will add some special places or referral fees or something like that for actual operations. But they're dispensing the chemicals that we used to give sex offenders in prison, that they're using off-label for children.

Nobody's ever done any tests on what happens to children when you give them these very potent drugs at a very early age. So, yeah, babies can experience sexuality, he says. In August of 2021, Democrat Governor J.B. Pritzker of Illinois, and I've told you about his family before, right? The Hyatt family. And he's got somebody that, he's got a friend, not a friend, a cousin, Jennifer Pritzker, he calls himself. But he's a guy, you know.

And he dresses up. I just can't get that picture out of my mind with the two of them next to each other. Uh, the guy is a doppelganger for the governor, his cousin. I dressed up like a woman and the Pritzker family has been one of the premier financiers of all this stuff. They've funded things in various institutions and hospitals to start this on kids at a very, very young age. And Governor Pritzker of Illinois signed a so-called sex education bill that required teaching students how to access abortion. Well, isn't that nice for Planned Parenthood?

Here's how you get to Planned Parenthood. How to access abortion, transgender hormones, and HIV drugs. During this past summer, a school board director from Washington State promoted a sex education workshop for nine-year-olds and hosted at her own self-owned sex shop. Now, I've seen multiple reports of this. Travis Gold, thank you very much for the tip. Brian Deb McCartney, thank you very much.

God bless you this Christmas season. Thank you very much. David and family, we love and respect you. Well, thank you very much. Thank you. And Austin McGee, match these tips. I can't thank all of you enough. It is just amazingly generous. Thank you so much. Before we change topics, though, in the amount of time we've got left,

I do want to talk a little bit about what's going on with some of the free speech issues and Twitter versus TikTok. But before I leave this whole thing about abusing children, Biden's director of HHS, Javier Becerra, has now reiterated that the Biden administration believes in gender transition. And not only that, do they believe in it and believe in it for minors, but they want taxpayers to pay for it.

Yeah. It wasn't just a couple of years ago. I think it was before the pandemic stuff. There was a guy who was a psychologist. He specialized in trying to help people with this gender dysphoria stuff. And he said, look, and he was a world respected expert throughout the world, talked about it for many times. And he got on Twitter and he said, look, I think the Canadian government ought to pay for this.

But I've been doing this for several decades and no minors should be doing this. Only for people that are 21 years old and have lived, and I forget what he said, two or three years, as in the gender that they want to try to change to. And he was vilified and purged on Twitter, mainly, other places as well, for saying that. And he was an expert. All he was saying was, this is a very serious thing,

and you need to understand the consequences of it. You need to understand when you undergo an operation like that, you need to understand the downsides of it. And all these people were saying, they never told me that this was going to happen. They have severe health effects from this that last a long time. But when you do this to children, I'm sorry, but Javier Becerra is nothing but a rank pedophile,

doing this for money, whether he has involvement with the kids or not. And not only that, we've known for a while that this guy is a cannibal, cannibalizing kids. He supported the people who were doing abortions, selecting out the kids so they could harvest the organs. That's cannibalism. It's cannibalism. And as Attorney General in California, after Lala Harris, the two of them

went after David Daleiden with the Center for Medical Progress because they found people who were selling baby parts for hire. And then, of course, selectively doing it, you know, doing the abortion, having the babies selected so they could have them born alive and remove the organs while they're living. That's the way that it's always been done. And they're talking about how they can extend that as well.

So they knew about all this, and as part of this lawsuit that Lala Harris and Javier Becerra did, they were able to find out that one of their main customers was Fauci was Fauci. Fauci. So this guy will kill babies to get to harvest their parts. And now he wants to say that minors should be mutilated at taxpayer expense. He refused to answer whether or not there should be parental consent or involvement with this even. And that's how far off the charts these people are.

But I want to talk about some of the speech issues, because it does involve, you know, when we look at what is happening with some bills that are being introduced and what is happening with Elon Musk. I'll just say, you know, Elon Musk is getting a lot of grief for this stuff. When you look at Fauci, what he's doing in terms of harvesting baby organs,

I'm absolutely amazed that there was a lot more outrage and empathy about the puppy experiments and empathy for and empathy about the puppy experiments. And empathy for that, empathy for the puppies, more empathy for the puppies than for the babies. We've seen this for quite some time. But I've said when we talk about the puppies, it is outrageous, you know, what Fauci did for not a good reason. And I said when I talked about that, that, um,

one of the indications that you see of somebody who grows up to be a serial killer or something like that, you should go back and look at their life. And you find out that people that knew them knew that at a very early age, they were torturing animals at absolutely no empathy whatsoever or feeling for these animals and they would torture them. And the key part about that is that if you've got no empathy, um, you can easily turn into a serial killer. And when you look at these, these experiments that are being, that are part of this neural link stuff, and he's now got the feds on him.

And, and a large part of that is a game of Thrones. They don't really care. I mean, they're not coming after Javier Becerra. They're not coming after Fauci. They wouldn't be coming after Elon Musk if it wasn't for the Twitter thing. And the Twitter thing is something that, um, is a threat to their power base. And that's why they're coming after him because, you know, they're psychopaths as well. And they don't have any empathy for babies or puppies or monkeys or humans.

They don't have any empathy for anybody. They're coming after him because of that. But it's very disturbing to see that. It's very disturbing to see that just as Trump is doing, you know, he's cracking the whip. Come on, we've got to go faster, faster, faster. Cut corners here. Let's forget about this and forget about that.

We've got to get this result right away. It's very disturbing to see that happening. And when you look at what is going on with free speech and you look at the concerns about TikTok, isn't it interesting that as you have governors saying, well, we're not going to allow TikTok on any state phones and things like that. Of course, why would you have it on a serious business phone anyway? But the real issue is not about the videos. The real issue is the fact that this is something that is used to surveil us. That has been the issue from the very beginning, especially about social media,

about the Internet in general. The Internet, 1960, J.C.R. Licklider with DARPA. Oh, what's, you know, the psychologist says, hey, we need to have something that works like this. Yeah. We can have this massive online encyclopedia that's hyperlinked to everything else. So you can do all kinds of study and things like that. But yeah, we can also, we can manipulate people psychologically and we can measure very precisely the effect of what we're doing to them, if it's working or not.

And so it's always been about that, especially social media. They intensified it with social media. And so the concerns about TikTok are coming from the fact that they don't want the Chinese doing that. And the concerns about Elon Musk is that they want to have those levers of power that they have had from the very beginning. You know, Jack Dorsey set this thing up. He got a lot of aid and support. It's documented by Washington. Say, hey, help us with this Arab Spring stuff. And as he helped him with, as he made his platform available for that type of thing, they supported his platform.

They gave him all kinds of resources and everything. Pretty much this whole thing he talked about, they said, I'm sorry there's so many layoffs. We just grew so fast. He didn't really have any control, that kind of day-to-day control. I mean, Elon Musk is a lot more hands-on on a daily basis. But it was Homeland Security and the intelligence agencies and the FBI and the rest of these, they basically just took over Twitter. They grew it very, very rapidly, put the people that they wanted in there to control the narrative that they wanted. That's

why I've said the longest time, talk about the deep state. You can't talk about the deep state unless you talk about the deputized state, the corporations that work with them, the corporations that were created by them for this purpose, to give them plausible deniability that they're the ones who are censoring, that they're the ones who are nudging and pushing out propaganda. No, we will let that be done through Twitter. This is why it has sent a big, you know, shiver through the spine of the people in Washington. Because I think Elon Musk is a very, very, very savvy political animal. And some people are saying, well, you know, maybe he doesn't know what he got, or maybe he knows exactly what he got. If you stop and look at what Jeff Bezos did, he spent $250 million for what?

For the Washington Post. Why? Well, the Washington Post is a very big paper, nationally, internationally, but especially in Washington. You know, they can make people look good or look bad or whatever. They can help significantly to push these agendas. What do you think Twitter does?

Internationally. It's far, far more powerful. And that's why there's this big fight. It's not a fight between good and evil. It's a fight between different families. It's a Game of Thrones fight. One of the guys is wearing a Baphomet symbol on his chest. I want to thank Austin McGee and all the people on Rock Band.

Just amazing. Thank you so much for the tips. It's a new record. We've never made this much in one day. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.