The David Knight Show - 7Mar23 The David Knight Show Unabridged

Episode Date: March 7, 2023

Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showYou can now support the show while purchasing gold and silver: www.davidknight.goldOr you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak Tn, 37764Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

What does it mean to be great at something? To master the skills and expertise you need to make an impact? At DCU, we nurture your talents, guiding you to greatness. Developed in partnership with leading employers, our postgraduate courses offer a wide range of unique and highly relevant qualifications. That's why our high-achieving graduates are consistently in demand. So, to follow your passions and discover your greatness, visit dcu.ie forward slash postgraduate. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 7th of March, year of our Lord 2023.

Day 1090 of the New World Orders. This is Tony Arterburn, and I'm filling in for the great David Knight. It's great to be back. Well, I'm in studio with Beans the Brave. That's my 12 and a half pounds, sometimes a little bit heavier Chihuahua mix. She's going to keep the studio safe from woodland creatures, intruders, bad vibes, all the rest. We've got a great show today. I'm going to host the first two hours, and then we're going to bring on Charlie Robinson, the author of The Octopus of Global Control and host of Macroaggressions. Always good to see Charlie. I'll probably be going to the chat.

I had a time setting up the new stream code, so I hope everything's going out on DLive, Rockfin, Rumble, Odyssey. It looks like it is. We're on Twitter also on david's twitter let me check the rock fin really quick and i'll make sure that we hit the go live key everything looks good so we'll go over some headlines um obviously i'm not david so it's a different kind of show with me um i try to find what's relevant what i find to be like signpost and warnings uh trends things like that to look at.

So we'll go over some of that. And of course, your chats. I mean, if there's a way that I can go back and forth and look at the chat and do live, I promise you that I will. I know that a lot of times I don't engage with the audience like if I had a producer, but I'm going to try today. Okay, so we'll see if we can get through this together. David is with the Tennessee legislature, and we really wish him well on that. I know that's so important to talk about central bank digital currency. To me, that is the most important issue of our time because it's going to make null and

void all philosophies and politics and our ability to speak out, our ability to live, our ability to buy and sell, our ability to prosper. It is the number one enemy. And we will get to another story on technocracy.news about the central bank digital currency. Also, tomorrow, Gard Goldsmith will be hosting the entire three hours. So I look forward, I'm going to be producing tomorrow for guard and, uh, get him set up this evening. I'm

just going to be great. So I'll be here tomorrow a little bit, just kind of in the background. As we watched the, uh, legendary guard Goldsmith do his thing. He makes radio look easy. Doesn't he makes all media look easy. So I love having guard on. Uh, but, uh, I just thought, man, it'd be great if he just hosted his own, his own show tomorrow. So I love having guard on. But I just thought, man, it'd be great if he just hosted his own show tomorrow. So we'll be seeing guard. All right, let's jump into some headlines. Let's see what the Central Intelligence Agency wants me to talk about. Not that we're part of Operation Mockingbird. Let me share my screen here. Something I didn't do. Let's go to the headlines of Drudge. China warns USA of conflict.

Xi blunt rebuke. McCarthy scraps the Taiwan trip. And up here in the left-hand corner, they'll always hide some little blurb from Drudge. But it's Michelle O, 24. This is going to make Billy Ray Valentine grin because he's always talking about, once they bring in Michelle Obama, it's over. Not that he supports that, but he's just talking about demographically the media and everything else.

And I just kind of chuckle and think, I don't know, folks, that may be the biggest gender reveal party ever. If that's the if that's the case, if we get that, it might be it might get weirder. Not that America can get much weirder, but that might be one of the weirdest campaigns in the history of ever. But we'll see. Maybe we'll have Billy Ray. Maybe Billy Ray will pop in the back office here and tell me what he thinks about that. He's certainly welcome to. All right. So let's go back to to the China issue. And why is this important? And, you know, if you're not, if you haven't paid attention to geopolitics and foreign policy, this looks like it's organic.

Like this is, oh man, this is, we're really running against up against a conflict with China. I have a hard time with this. Reason being, if you go back to something that David said, and I thought was very apt, and it was if Trump is selected in 2020, we'll have conflict with China most likely. And if it's Biden is selected, we'll have conflict with Russia. But we might get unlucky and have conflict with both. And it looks like the third option, unlucky. And I've always talked about, you know, looking at Trump and the, you know, this faux nationalism that he put forward.

Now, again, I supported the economic nationalism, the tariffs. I supported all of that. I think that's because that's more akin to our American history and what Trump was doing. As far as the rhetoric. I mean, he did some tariffs against Chinese imports, but nothing like we needed to do to actually reset the balance. But I thought it would be more of like a faux conflict, not really kind of a nerf type thing, more of a wag the dog than anything else. And it wasn't that concerning to me because I knew the history of our relations with China going back to the Nixon administration. And this isn't covered a lot, but this was to have opened China in 72, the way that Nixon did and Kissinger,

to do that was huge. A Democrat couldn't have done that. Nixon was right about that. I mean, they would have been eviscerated by the media and called communist and traitors, especially during the Cold War. And Nixon, with his so-called anti-communist credentials, was able to somewhat pull it off and was celebrated by the media. So he opened China at the time. And if you read Pat Buchanan's memoirs, he said it was just like being on the surface of the moon. I'm taking this out of a, you know, a quote from his, but it's, he's like, it was being like at a different, a different world. They were isolated completely.

We didn't have diplomatic relations at all with China. You know, Mao Zedong got nuclear weapons, I think, in 1964. So they were a nuclear power. They were also having conflict with the Soviets on those borders, the lands that were taken by the Russian czars. And so there was conflict between the Soviets and the communist Chinese. And again, they were isolated. We didn't have diplomatic relations our relations our foreign policy was containment through the Truman Doctrine and we had during the Korean War one of MacArthur's threats was that he was going to unleash Chiang you know from Formosa which is Taiwan that's where Chiang Kai-shek fled to when the Rockefellers and Rothschilds and multinational corporations funded Mao Tse-Tung's 1949 revolution, which is why they always do, right?

So we had this opening of China, and everything changed. Our foreign policy was turned on its head. We went into what you would call a spirit of detente. And what that meant was it was a realignment. We gave verbal promises to Mao that we would support a one China policy. It was very important to Mao to hear that. So we basically just gave up Taiwan back in 1972 verbally. And again, we did this fast forwarding to 1979.

Zygmunt Brzezinski and Jimmy Carter put that in writing. It's on January 1st, 1979 that the United States of America recognized the one China policy. So this was set in motion that we were starting to back away from our Cold War alliances. And again, we didn't support necessarily the Chinese going and taking it by force, but really on paper, what it looked like was an eventual absorption back into mainland China. By the way, not that I support that, but you could see that the groundwork was being laid for that because it was important for us to have the Chinese as an ally in the Cold War. If you remember the movie Red Dawn, it was a great movie when I was a kid. I mean, this was the invasion of the United States by Soviet forces and Cubans. And there's a scene in there where they're talking about, well, who's on our side?

What does it mean to be great at something? To master the skills and expertise you need to make an impact? At DCU, we nurture your talents, guiding you to greatness. Developed in partnership with leading employers, our postgraduate courses offer a wide range of unique and highly relevant qualifications. That's why our high achieving graduates are consistently in demand. So to follow your passions and discover your greatness, visit dcu.ie forward slash postgraduate. And, you know, one of the colonel there that gets

shot down says, well, it's about a 600 million screaming Chinaman. And they said, well, don't you mean a billion? He says, well, there were. So there was implied in the 1980s that we were allies. Not only were allies, but we were sharing trade and there was intelligence being shared. I mean, there was so much information that we gave Mao in 72 with that back channel communiques and things with Kissinger. It's unbelievable. If you read about it, it doesn't make any sense because if you fast forward to the 90s, you have these bags of cash. The Chinese were giving literally bags of cash

to the Clinton White House, and the Clinton White House gave the Chinese missile technology and whatever missile technology or weapons technology that we didn't give them directly, the Israelis would sell them. gave the Chinese missile technology and whatever missile technology or weapons technology that we didn't give them directly, the Israelis would sell them. And then that really culminated in 2001 and 90 days to the day from 9-11 on December 11th, 2001, the Bush administration gave most favored trading status, nation trading status to China, which just basically opened up everything. What was left of the soul of America

was pawned off. And, you know, I, at nauseam, I know if you've listened to my shows, I'm going to repeat the statistics, but it's, you know, after that we lost 55,000 factories in the Bush administration alone. It was one in three manufacturing jobs disappeared. It was a total gutting of what was left. Again, NAFTA did a pretty good job, but that was the fait accompli for globalism. So the rulers of this country, the Trilateral Commission, the globalists, believed in an Asian-centered 21st century. There was not to be another American century.

That was, again, that's why you have in 1973, the year after we opened China, you get the formation of the Trilateral Commission, which is very important. A lot of trilaterals running everything now. And then, of course, the 1974, the next year year was the last year that we ran a trade surplus. And if you know how important that is to American sovereignty, if you know how important that is to American security, that we had, you know, a strong manufacturing base, and that's why our history is full of that, then you'll see why that was important. Why, why is it that such a pivotal event to lose that wealth and technology? Why it was given away? So I look at these headlines, ladies and gentlemen, and I have a problem because I do think that there's something really dangerous in them.

It's not that I think these are fake anymore because I thought a lot of the back and forth with China and Trump was somewhat fake. Now I'm starting to get worried that the third option that David talked about, if we're really unlucky, we'll have war with both Russia and China. We may have our elite, whoever is in control of the levers of power, may indeed be trying to set us up for a worldwide war and lay the groundwork. Look at the Chinese balloon story. Has anybody ever thought that was so bizarre? And the rhetoric coming out of Washington and delaying the Secretary of State's trip because of this balloon and all the rest, and just look, they're spying on us, which I thought was just pretty hilarious. The Chinese don't need a balloon. trip because of this balloon and all the rest, you know, and just look, they're spying on us,

which I thought was just pretty hilarious. The Chinese don't need a balloon to spy on the innermost workings of this government or our people. They literally own politicians. You realize the influence that the Chinese have. And by the way, the Chinese are a conduit to international banking cartels. So when you talk about, you know, you talk about the Chinese government, yes, they're communist, yes, they're totalitarian, but they're also a proving ground for globalism, for the new world order, right? And so they own, by proxy, you know, they are through China, the major swaths of American universities and companies and land, right? This is massive. Russia doesn't have that. It's why it's always made no sense to me. Well, it does if you look at this as a controlled demolition of our forces and of American sovereignty. you know, the, the obsession by the elites with Russia and, uh, the military industrial complex with Russia. And they never talked about China. They, it was almost never, ever brought up. And that's because of the massive amount of influence that they had and

have. So it is really strange. If you know the history, if you know what happened, you know, that's what they're, they're counting on you, not knowing this and just thinking, wow, this is weird. This is coming out of nowhere. Well, it's kind of coming out of nowhere. But at the same time, it makes no logical historical sense when you realize that this government and the policy of this country. What does it mean to be great at something, to master the skills and expertise you need to make an impact? At DCU, we nurture your talents, guiding you to greatness. Developed in partnership with leading employers, our postgraduate courses offer a wide range of unique and highly relevant qualifications.

That's why our high-achieving graduates are consistently in demand. So, to follow your passions and discover your greatness, visit dcu.ie forward slash postgraduate. Has been to build up China, you know, and again, this is, I think is something coming from the ruling class was to build up China. And it looks like they could have, and this is something that, you know, Joel Skousen talks about, could be have built it up to fight it. And that is a nightmare scenario that I pray that I'm wrong about, or this is something, this is a fluke. But I just worry.

I look at these headlines, and this is something I wanted to bring to your attention. When you know the backdrop, that's what makes it even stranger, right? Because this is something I didn't expect. I thought, well, if they have some sort of conflict, and especially if Trump was reselected, if Trump was reselected and they have some sort of conflict, then it's going to be fake. You know, maybe both sides kind of in on it. We'll have some kind of Cold War States, and it's our policy to have a one China policy. We had almost really no, by the way, this is another throwback. When we talk about no diplomatic relations, not really, we had diplomatic relations, but nothing like we have with China. The first call that Donald Trump got as president or no president elect from a world leader to,

from, this is my memory was from the president of Taiwan. And if you recall, the media went berserk, like you're not supposed to even talk to Taiwan. So imagine how this reversal and to see that's how it's even stranger because the media and especially the Fox News types. And then this is where you get the the fake right.

I mean, we cannot there is no more clear picture of fake right now than the fake right. Because you talk about blaming our problems on China, which is a very convenient boogeyman. I mean, the Putin's price hike was something, you know, Biden put sanctions on us, which is a very convenient boogeyman. I mean, uh, the Putin's price hike was something, you know, Biden put sanctions on us basically, but, uh, that's Putin's fault for inflation. Well, the right does the same thing with the COVID 1984 lockdowns. Oh, it's a, it's a lab leak and the Chinese did it right. And then you have senators like Tom Cotton, you know, calling out China and, and out China and talking about the threat that China poses. Well, I hate to ruin it for everybody, but the calls are coming from inside

the house, right? That I'm, I'm not worried about, you know, this is something, if you know anything about geopolitics and nuclear weapons and the stasis of the, of the, of the cold war, you know, there is, is troublesome. Um, but the outside threats are nothing like the inside threats. And it's always a misdirection. It's a magic trick that these politicians and power hungry elite are always playing on us. And it's just a Mr. Show us another, you know, a false enemy, you know, a false challenge. It's, it's, it's, it's outside. It's not coming from inside. It's challenge. It's, it's, it's, it's, it's outside. It's not coming from inside. It's outside. It's not our fault. Like we locked you down. We said

you were non-essential. We printed 80% of all the dollars ever created. We bankrupted the country. You know, we, we destroyed the supply chain, you know, all of the damage that was, we psychologically damaged an entire generation of children, but that's not our fault. There was a lab leak and the Chinese did it. And we were just so caught unaware. It's kind of like the balloon story. We were so, you know, it's like a pitiful giant. Like we don't know what to do. There's this balloon that's flying over us and it's taking all of our pictures. I mean, again, you see the hysteria and all of this kind of tracks back to a manufactured enemy, which is how far do they want to take this? That is the question, and we'll see. When you look at history, which is what I do, it's my wheelhouse something that henry ford said he said that uh history was

bunk but uh i like uh something that uh napoleon and i think this could be attributed to uh to uh edward gibbon as well but that history was a pack of lies agreed upon right so you look back and you know that international banking bank bankers' wars, international banking is really the catalyst for so much of this, right? For so many, they play both sides. So if the origin story of the Soviet Union was the Warburgs and the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds and all the rest, and of course, you know, then we had, you know, the, the 20th century and the cold war, both pointing nuclear weapons at each other, but you know, they had special landing zones and, and airports for Rockefeller. Did you know that?

Did you know that the Soviets also had manufacturing rights to make different and foreign aid from the U S I don't know if you knew that we had they had massive amounts of uh you know technology sharing and things that we did together uh through corporations and they would you know through us through U.S. corporations working hand in hand with the Soviet government would make the weapons that would kill our troops in Vietnam right both sides against the middle. And we're in the middle, by the way. We're held hostage by this game that they're playing.

Same thing with the Chinese. You know, you have the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, major banking houses, always love communism. It's their favorite thing, right? They like to set up, you know, through the Hegelian dialectic, these totalitarian regimes that they fund, they control top down. They have all the, you know, the working machinery and everything that makes everything. They have it, they make it right. But only one, it's kind of like a 15 minute city.

You know, you get, Oh, you're 15 minutes away from everything. And there's only one thing, right? It's the same thing with, with capitalists so-called the uh the richest people in the world the parasite class uh the globalist elite they fund all this and communism is one of their favorite things to fund if not the favorite thing to fund because it it creates a destruction of society and they get to rule over that. If you haven't noticed all of this lately going on with our world and the emergence of central bank digital currency, the technology that the elites have jumped on is to create, I think, not only just a new world order, but the end of history itself where they own everything, where we're the new serfs, that there is no competition.

You go back to 1913. The reason that we have an income tax, ladies and gents, is not because progressives rose up and demanded equality. The income tax was given to you by the world's richest people. They exempted themselves, their foundations, and they kicked the ladder over to make sure nobody could ever compete with them again. Then they gave you the federal reserve and the income tax was meant to pay the interest on the fake money, the monopoly money that they would make. So it's a rigged game. So that begs the question again, how much of this is real? This is something I wanted to bring to your attention. It's a thought experiment because we really don't know. Fear, right, is the spirit of the enemy, right? God wants us to live our best lives, to live boldly, to live not by lies.

You know, something you talk about soul genition and what David talks about all the time, not living by that, not living in the spirit of fear. So I bring this to your attention, not to be, not to just run up the headline and have some sort of manufactured, you know, fear system in my broadcast, but to kind of give you a background. This is a thought experiment. We run over it together. And I'm honored to be here doing that with you. That's my stream of consciousness broadcast on the David Knight Show. Again, David is out for the next two days. He'll be at the Tennessee legislature and, um, really wish him well. I'm going to hope they will get some clips from that. And, uh, if anything happens, he's welcome to stream into the show. And I've got, um, Travis can always text him. We can always get David on the show if he needs to, uh, to speak to his audience. But, uh, if hopefully too, I'll be able to talk to some of the folks on chat on Rockfin

here in a minute. Let's take a quick break. I wanted to bring up thedavidknightshow.com. That was davidknight.go. We'll get to that in a minute. I'm drinking out of my David Knight mug. And, of course, the other one is back at the homestead where you've got first coffee, then save the world, which is now my favorite mug. So I'm left with just my regular David Knight mug, which I love them both. But if you go to TheDavidKnightShow.com, folks, if you're finding this on podcast or wherever this show is served up, uh, know that you can share this with

others and you can, um, send them the link to the website that gives them the links to rumble Odyssey D live Twitter, rock fin. Uh, you can see where the, this month's gas gauge is at, where this is how the show is kept on the air by your generous donations and uh sponsorship by wise wolf gold and silver which we're very very proud to do and wolf pack and we'll talk about that but uh the david night show dot com has the ability where you can order products and that's another way you can support david and keep the truth on the air first coffee then save the world i wish i had all those commercials that travis had produced with the ai it's one of my favorite things in the world i wish i had all those commercials that travis had produced with the ai it's one of my favorite things in the world to hear the kamala harris ai version when she's talking about uh

you got you can't hold coffee in your hands right now that's uh you know what it sounds so real in our world what we're and what we're looking at in this part of the simulation. The David Knight Coin Challenge coin, that's something that Jason Barker did. What does it mean to be great at something? To master the skills and expertise you need to make an impact? At DCU, we nurture your talents, guiding you to greatness. Developed in partnership with leading employers, our postgraduate courses offer a wide range of unique and highly relevant qualifications. That's why our high achieving graduates are consistently in demand. So to follow your passions and discover your greatness,

visit dcu.ie forward slash postgraduate. Nights of the Storm. I was on the Nights of the Storm on Saturday. Great show. A lot of fun. I was proud to be there. So shout out to Knights of the Storm who, you know, this is something I talk to people all the time. They say, what can I do? I'm like, well, speak out, do your own show, you know, write an article, get a sub stack, information, right? This is the, we're foot soldiers in the war of ideas, of us and you can take up arms with you know the pin is mightier than the sword which make that always makes me laugh because i thought i can't say that without thinking of douglas mcarthur he said whoever said the pin pin is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons which makes me laugh but you got you get but you get it, right? Words are powerful. Ideas can change history, and you can change hearts and minds.

It makes the ruling elite, it makes their totalitarian experiment inert, if enough people know. Anyway, thedavidknightshow.com, how to successfully donate to David, and you can check out davidknight.gold. Another part of davidknight.gold is the Wolfpack. And, uh, I'll give you some updates on, on Wolfpack here in the broadcast. We've got a lot of great stuff going on. It's funny.

I get asked all the time, like, well, it's a really genius idea. And thanks, but it's not how i intended it to be with what it is now with hundreds and members uh all over the country and uh i mean i've got a full time staff now i didn't realize what it was going to do and how popular it was going to be and then how we're setting it up as a communications hub it's really the answer to the central bank digital currency. I didn't intend for it to do what it's doing now, but I'm very thankful. I'm very careful not to take credit for things that I, and be honest about it because God knows my heart. I don't need to just act like I'm a genius, but yeah, it's doing really well. There was a commercial that Kinsey

did for me back when we first started. I'm going to play it a couple of times in the broadcast. I love this clip. I narrate the content, but it's a little overview of how we got here, especially with the debasement of our currency

and I think what's going to be the demise of the dollar, uh, very soon. And, uh, that's on the way and we can all prepare for that. So it's one of the reasons that I put up, uh, wolfpack.gold and, uh, we're going to, I want to play the commercial at least a couple of times in the broadcast today. So let me put this on. This is the commercial that, uh, Kenzie did for me back in, uh, September, October, or somewhere in that timeframe, uh, right when we launched Wolfpack. And I think you'll enjoy it.

Stand by. I'm told by Billy Ray Valentine just texted me and said we had no audio on that video. So anyway, that's my fault. I don't know why. Sometimes my system is doing this. It picks and chooses what audio it's going to play. I have no idea how it does that. So I guess we'll just forego any of these type of audio commercials.

I know David has one in here that works, so maybe use that later. But we'll just do a show. We'll just do it like Bill O'Reilly. Let's do it live. Just do it live. So thank you, Billy, for that. And this is when you're your own producer, folks. I know that you can sympathize a little bit with me uh but uh maybe empathize more all right

so let's just jump into some more headlines we'll keep doing the news uh headlines and uh signposts on the road ahead and then i wanted to talk about there was something great um that came out on zero hedge uh last week about 10 days. I was able to find it because I wanted to bring it back up. And it had to do with one of the reasons that the deep state murdered JFK in Dallas, I believe, was one of the speeches that he gave at American University. I always love that speech. I'm a connoisseur of the spoken word. I love it when I can hear magnificent rhetoric because we don't hear that in the modern era.

I mean, these most speakers are flat. They're bombastic. They're hubristic. You get like a Donald Trump with the massive ego and all that, and it's not eloquent. But you go back. There was a time when we had learned people that could actually speak. One of them was John F. Kennedy, and he had a magnificent speech about peace. And I'd always thought that's one of the reasons that he was killed.

And then somebody put out an article, this is the speech that sealed JFK's fate. So I thought, well, that's something that's been in my mind for a long time. So we'll talk about that here in a while. But I wanted to, let's just go through some headlines. And again, we got about 90 minutes or so before we're met with Charlie Robinson of macro aggressions. And I texted Charlie yesterday and I said, what do you, anything you want to talk about? He just sent back a LOL, where do we start? And I thought, I'll just see you tomorrow. That's how Charlie joins the show. He's going to be loaded for bear. I'm sure he'll have something

in his wheelhouse. Something will have happened within the last 24 hours or whatever since we spoke. All right, let's go through some headlines here. This was on technocracy, uh, dot news. Great website, by the way, Patrick would, uh, I subscribe over there. Um, you know, Anthony Sutton was his mentor who wrote, uh, the wall street and the Bolshevik revolution and, uh, wall street in the third Reich and all that. I mean, it's just, uh, in the, the federal Reserve conspiracy. They were writing about the Trilateral Commission way early. So anyway, Patrick Wood, technocracy.news. On civil liberties, DHS, Domestic Intelligence Program. That sounds familiar, by the way.

We'll talk about that in a second. The actual Domestic Intelligence Program. There apparently is no protection to safeguard the erosion of civil liberties when it comes to the government spying on its own citizens, and even more so when agencies are weaponized to cause harm to those same citizens. The Constitution has experienced death by a thousand cuts over the last 50 years and is perilously close to final death. That is Patrick Wood's take on this story.

For years, the Department of Homeland Security has run a virtually unknown program gathering domestic intelligence, one of many revelations in a wide-ranging set of documents reviewed by Politico. Those documents also reveal that a significant number of employees in DHS intelligence offices have raised concerns that the work they are doing could be illegal. You think so? You know, it's funny. You kind of get used to things, but I never really got used to DHS. Even, you know, this came about when I was 22 because I was 21 on, uh, in 2001.

Remember they had Tom Ridge. He was the first head of the department of Homeland security and they had different color codes. So you could know what, like, how afraid are you at yellow, you know, or red or, you know, what even green? I don't know. Was it blue? Was blue a thing?

They had different color codes to tell you how afraid you should be under that program. But the whole reason that you had a DHS was, oh, well, the CIA wasn't talking to the FBI. They weren't sharing intelligence on the people that were learning how to fly planes, but not land and all this stuff's it's comical when you actually start to unravel what 9-11 was. But that was the excuse that they gave. Right. So clearly the answer when two giant mega agencies don't share intelligence is to create a third agency that will become even more bureaucratic. So that's what the government does. And that's not what DHS, it's kind of like the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was meant to target patriots, you know, because we were supposed to have this worldwide civilizational clash of our time, just generational twilight struggle

with militant Islam. Hey, where'd that go? Yeah, I've got questions on that i fought in those wars i thought this was supposed to be you know us versus them and it's gonna we're gonna democratize mankind and all that no we um we destroyed some big parts of civilization uh but where did that big struggle go you know i know that there are such things as terrorists. I got it. But, you know, if you stop funding them like ISIS in Syria with John McCain or Al Qaeda, which means the database, not the base, if you stop funding them and giving them, you know, weapons and munitions and white Toyota pickups and everything else, it's it's funny how they kind of just fall off the map. And then the DHS, you know, buying, you know, billions of round, whatever they've got, you know, they buy all the munitions and all this stuff kind of gearing up for something domestically. What is it for when I ran for Congress? See, I'm not like Rick Perry. I actually

remember the, uh, the agencies, the Dallas morning news was just about had enough of me because they'd asked me questions like, you know, what would some agencies that you cut? My first one was the Department of Homeland Security. They didn't like that answer. There's a whole lot of things the Dallas Morning News didn't like about me. They also did a medical diagnosis. So I don't know that you knew that the Dallas Morning News was a medical organization, but they clearly are. And I can maybe tell that story later.

They are. I've never been treated so unfairly, but happy to have been. That means I was over the target. Under the domestic intelligence program, officials are allowed to seek interviews with just about anyone in the United States. That includes people held in immigrant detention centers, local jails, and federal prisons. DHS's intelligence professionals have to say they're conducting intelligence interviews, and they have to tell the people that they seek to interview

that their participation is voluntary. But the fact that they're allowed to go directly to incarcerated people circumventing their lawyers raises important civil liberties concerns, according to legal experts. What does it mean to be great at something? To master the skills and expertise you need to make an impact? At DCU, we nurture your talents, guiding you to greatness. Developed in partnership with leading employers, our postgraduate courses offer a wide range of unique and highly relevant qualifications.

That's why our high achieving graduates are consistently in demand. So to follow your passions and discover your greatness, visit dcu.ie forward slash postgraduate. Well, the biggest concern is why do you exist? That's the, that's the number one. Why are you here? Not only that, you're circumventing things because you know, it's, it's, it's the, it's the gray area, the domestic police. That's what they're building. The specific element of the program, which has been in place for years, was paused last year because of internal concerns. DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis, which runs the program,

uses it to gather information about threats to the U.S., including transnational drug trafficking and organized crime. But the fact that this low-profile office is collecting intelligence by questioning people in the U.S. is virtually unknown. The inner workings of the program, called the Overt Human Intelligence Collection Program, are described in the large tranche of internal documents Politico reviewed from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis. Those documents and additional interviews revealed widespread internal concerns about legally questionable tactics and political pressure. Oh, this is the wing of DHS is a political wing, right?

Just like the FBI is. And if you think, I mean, all when Trump talks about or anybody talks about smashing the deep state. You have to realize how entrenched they really are. And of course, he doesn't mean those things. Those are great. You know, that's a kind of a Cambridge Analytica talking point. You know, somebody's feeding him some new lines, by the way. David went over that really well.

Somebody's feeding him some talking points. Somebody must have run that through some kind of algorithm to see what people are wanting to hear. But what it comes down to is that the people and the leaders of these organizations and these things like DHS and FBI totally entrenched for the globalist left or however you want to define that. But they are the state. And they are. Name me a right wing leader or conservative, so-called, of any of these organizations. Name me one. I mean, you might find somebody in the lower echelons, but you're not going to.

The leadership, the policy, you know, policy is in personnel as policy and vice versa. And that is what we're seeing with these, uh, these agencies unconstitutional, by the way, uh, one unnamed employee quoted in April, 2021 document said leadership of the A and I's office of regional intelligence is shady and runs like a corrupt government. Another document said some employees worried so much about the legality of their activities that they wanted their employer to cover legal liability insurance.

I hope that that's a need. Kerry Batchester, formerly the senior legislative advisor to the DHS Undersecretary for Intelligence, said the fact that the agency is directly questioning Americans as part of a domestic intelligence program is deeply concerning given the history of scandals related to past domestic intelligence programs by the FBI. Oh, it's,

it's concerning, but that's what it's for. You know, the Patriot act wasn't meant to target people in caves. The Patriot Act, aptly named, was meant to target patriots and people that might have questions about the rising Leviathan in Washington, D.C., the political regime and the politicization of these agencies, which is massive. Bokner, who served as a DHS liaison with Capitol Hill from 2006 to 2007, said she told members

of Congress adamantly over and over again that the INA didn't collect intelligence in the U.S. I don't know any counsel in their right mind that would sign off on that. And any member of Congress that would say, that's okay, said Bochner, who currently runs a consulting firm. If these people are out there interviewing folks that still have constitutional privilege without their lawyer present, that's immoral. Well, it is. And I think this is a sign of the times. You can certainly see, you know, you go back to 2020 and the heartbreak of watching this manufactured crisis, you know, past May in 2020, where you had Antifa and the Marxists and just anybody that really thought it was a good time to riot or burn things down out in the streets, being funded by the world's richest people, pallets of bricks being laid out.

There was a key indicator here that should have told you everything that you needed to know. You had Portland, the federal building there, constantly being breached. People trying to throw Molotov cocktails into open doors and riots going on everywhere because people are funded. People are being flown around the country. DHS agents, I covered this story back in 2020, DHS agents that were taking people, the people that were rioting and taking them off the streets um they would take off their name tags and i remember i did this as a soldier in afghanistan had to take off my name tag because you know you could have your name recognized by these people on the battlefield especially if you're detaining them for intelligence and we were part of the first army company on the ground in

kandahar afghanistan so a lot of it was intelligence gatherings. We had to take off our name tags. Well, the DHS was doing that while they were collecting intelligence on the Marxist and Antifa because they were afraid. These are DHS agents afraid that they would be doxxed because some of them had been and their families harassed. But you know what happened the next week after that story came out? The head of DHS said that the number one threat to the United States was right-wing patriot movements. Didn't mention anything about the people that they had to remove their name tags for. They already knew who they're going to target. This other thing's a sideshow. And I'm not saying that every part of that movement on the right is the best way

or that I support all of it. All I'm saying is there was one group of people that were burning things to the ground. There was another group of people that were mainly having boat parties for Trump. Okay. That's good. Let's call it what it is. And, um, you know, a lot of, a lot of social media, a lot of,

you know, uh, posturing, but nothing, nothing that was damaging, nothing that was attacking the government itself. Right. But,

uh, but that's what they chose to demonize. And that should have told us everything we needed to know. All right, folks. Uh that's, I got two articles on technocracy.news, but we'll switch, we'll switch around a little bit. Again, this is just the chaos of my brain. I pick out things I want to talk about and we can just skip around. Let's see what else we've got. And I will give gold and silver prices today and more updates on that. In case you were worried that I wouldn't, I've got some articles on that.

Let's see. Let me X out of this Wolfpack video. I can't believe it doesn't have audio. All right. Here's another. Here's something we can talk about in the wheelhouse of foreign policy. Ukraine wants to, or Ukraine wants U.S. to provide cluster bombs with drones. Cluster bombs endanger civilians

by scattering small bombs across a large area and have been banned by over 100 countries. Well, I want to tell you a story while reading this article about cluster bombs. And of course we, there's only like three countries that didn't sign the, three major countries that didn't sign the treaty against cluster bombs. And I've seen cluster bombs.

And going back to afghanistan before we get in this article i'll tell you a little story um we were just told to go map the the ao the area of operations now um in case you didn't remember and i happen to know even at 21 22 years old that afghanistan was the most heavily mined country in the world. I knew a little thing or two about the Soviet invasion and the occupation there and how much they had mined the country and how much civil war they'd had. Well, we were just out driving around.

That's what we were told to do. Sound familiar? So we were just going to go map the most heavily mined country in the world. You know, make new roads, because that's always really smart. Well, we went down this one path just outside of the Kandahar Airport. And it was probably about five yellow tubes, almost like pipes with little even parachute type deals off the side of them. And the sergeant that I was with immediately stopped the vehicle. Once we were about a mile into this field of these little cylindrical things that were yellow.

And he freaks out because he realizes that these are cluster bombs. Some of them were unexploded. Many of them were. They had not detonated. They can be set off by all sorts of things, even radio waves. And who knows, right? And so he didn't want to just back out. And that's the first thing I said.

I said, let's just back out. And, um, that's the first thing I said, I said, let's just back out. And he was sat there in panic, you know, and I just yelled at me for saying, just back out. Just when you, you, you rolled in, just back out. It's kind of like Ron Paul was telling, telling the politicians in 2008, when he ran for president, we marched into Iraq. We just marched right out. No, you can't do that.

Yes, you can. And, uh, anyway, it was anyway it was became like an almost an international incident they had to call the canadians in and they came in this giant truck this giant these giant armored vehicles and uh drove down there with all their gear on and went through this big field and got all the way to where we were located and the this officer this canadian officer gets out and he just walks right up to us and looks out and says why don't you back up eh that's exactly right why don't you back up and those were cluster bombs so i got to see some of these up close uh ukraine has been seeking

cluster bombs from the u.s to use in its war against russian forces it is now asking for a type of the conventional munition that they want to adapt so they can be dropped from drones. This is reported from Reuters and antiwar.com. According to House Reps Adam Smith and Jason Crow, Ukraine is seeking the MK-20, an air-delivered cluster bomb. They said Ukrainian officials were asking members of Congress to persuade the White House to sign off on them on the delivery from the recent Munich Security Conference. Cluster munitions scatter small bombs over large areas, making them more indiscriminate than other munitions, according to Reuters.

The MK-20 releases 240 dart-like submunitions or bomblets after being dropped. The bomblets and cluster munitions often don't explode on impact, making them a danger to civilians who come across them similar to landmines, which is such a wonderful, a beautiful thing that we're helping. Just did you change your profile picture on, on social media to the Ukrainian flag yet? You need to do that, folks.

I mean, offer up your children. Offer them up to Zelensky, the t-shirt man. They're such a moral thing, right? Just no corruption there. They just need a few more bio labs on the border. They just need a few more companies to launder money for the Biden regime and others. And again, the 2008 convention on cluster munitions that bans the weapon has over 100 signatories, but the U S Russia and Ukraine are not parties to that treaty. So they get to use these things, you know, because, Hey, it it's about freedom looks like they need some more

freedom over there since russia launched its invasion in february 2022 both russian and ukrainian forces have used cluster munitions kiev was also accused of using the bombs in populated areas of donesk back in 2014 oh you don't say? I thought they were perfect. Aren't I supposed to worship them? Well, the U.S. hasn't banned cluster bombs. Its forces haven't used them since one known incident in Yemen in 2009. The U.S. has been producing and selling cluster bombs to its allies until a few years ago. In 2016, Textron Systems stopped producing mk-20s

when the u.s stopped selling them to saudi arabia see we sell them to saudi arabia because that makes it moral so they can use them in yemen as a proxy war against iran all right you get it freedom but a congressional aide told reuters that there are about one million of the bombs in U.S. military stockpiles. And of course, Senator Lindsey Graham said the Ukrainian officials were pushing for U.S. lawmakers to pressure the Biden administration to provide cluster bombs in Munich. Graham favors sending the munitions and said he would lobby for them for this week besides the mk20s ukraine also wants 155 millimeter cluster artillery shells because yeah more freedom rep smith said he didn't think that the biden administration would sign off on the delivery of the controversial munitions oh i didn't think you, you sure?

Um, I'm not, I think that they will have bows on them probably with a gift card to something else, uh, for the t-shirt man, uh, rep crow said he might support. He might support arming Ukraine with the MK twenties. If Kiev would remove the bomblets and use them on non-cluster deployment. Oh, sure. We'll, uh, we'll make sure that we don't use the cluster bombs clustery. We won't cluster the cluster bombs. Oh, sure. I'm sure that's the way it'll go. Absolutely disgusting.

And of course, it had to be Lindsey Graham. What is the spirit of that guy? What is his, you know, he's worse than useless. He's detrimental in so many ways. I mean, you talk about, and the people of South Carolina just keep returning this guy to office. You talk about a rigged system. If I was in South Carolina, I wouldn't be worried about the Dominion machines. I wonder how this guy gets to be your senator.

I mean, what does he have in common with you? Are you really so obsessed with war? Do you really only see the United States is great. If we're bombing someone, is that what makes America great? You know, if you're listening to, and I'm sorry,

but the baby boomers in the, in the generation that listens to talk radio, that it's fading. Um, and I'm on talk radio, conservative talk. But, you know, the callers on there, like you listen to Mark Levin, they get animated about war.

They love it. And, you know, everything is, you know, Sean Hannity, where's his CIA lapel pin? They're animated only by that. They can't see America was great before we had an empire. Actually, it was the greatest. I mean, think about being born post-civil war, no income tax, no social security number. You wanted to plant your flag and create a business and start your own way, build your dream. It was absolutely possible for you. You were free on the earth. Yeah, there was problems and there

was corruption, but you could take your savings. You could put your silver dollars, your Morgan silver dollars, and put them in a coffee can and bury them in the ground and dig them up 20 years later, and it would still be a dollar. I mean, there was a time that America was great. There was the westward expansion, and then we just gave that up for empire you know you have the spanish-american war uh you know they they almost uh gave william mckinley a nervous breakdown because he was a civil war veteran and didn't want a new war and uh they kept no they kept they kept pushing it, pushing it.

You know, we got invaded Cuba with Teddy Roosevelt and San Juan Hill, and, you know, took, uh, Guam and the Philippines. And I had a history professor once on that. I went to the university of Dallas for a couple of years when I got out of the army, which was not, not exactly conducive to, you know, a 25, 26 year old. And, uh, running a business, but I did did it was a great book club for a couple of years and the history professor talked about the um taking of the philippines and that you know had we not done that that the there was german uh warships that were going to roll in and they were going to kick out the the aging and you know decrepit spanish

empire and uh so that was good that we took the philippines said my history professor and uh she They were going to kick out the aging and decrepit Spanish empire. And so that was good that we took the Philippines, said my history professor. She said, well, what do you think about my lecture? I said, I liked it all the way up until we took the Philippines. She said, oh, no, why? She said, well, if we didn't take it, then the Germans would have taken it. I said, yeah, and then they would have been held up on Corregidor on the Bataan Death March. She didn't like my answer. Uh, that's always where I go to that. The, uh, the what is of history. All right. So let's, let's see if we can pull up an actual David Knight commercial that will play the audio. And, uh, maybe I'll

have to get the geek squad out here to figure out why my audio is not working with certain clips, but it will with others. Let's see if we can get this working. And hopefully Billy Ray will text me if this isn't up and running here in a second. Let's check out The Common Man and I'll be right back after the break. The Common Man. They created Common Core and dumbed down our children.

They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The David Knight Show dot com. well i got a text during that commercial break that we indeed were going out over the air and it wasn't a dead audio like my last attempt. So happy for that. Thank you, Billy, for texting into texting into the show, letting me know.

We got a great many stories yet to cover. I'm pretty sure I can do them between now and when Charlie Robinson comes on. But again, third hour, Charlie Robinson, the octopus of global control.com and host of Macro Aggressions, good friend of myself and the show itself. And always great to talk to Charlie. All right. So let's skip around here. And again, I'm going to remind you of the DavidKnightShow.com. I don't have Rumble pulled up here, but I might try on our next break to see if I can get up the chat on Rumble. The chat on Rockfin seems to be doing okay, and I'll go check on that here in a minute. But let's keep going here. I've got enough

headlines to keep us busy. Maybe do a little bit of culture. Let's do that. Let's do some culture, and then maybe get back to the wheelhouse of foreign policy and CBDC. That sounds about right. So let's jump right into this. This is Zero Hedge from the Epoch Times. A judge rules that USA powerlifting must allow biological males to compete against women. A Minnesota judge has ruled that biological men who identify as women can compete against natural-born women in USA powerlifting, the USAPL, following a discrimination case against the organization. Well, to give you a little background on myself, I was the 2001 USA powerlifting national champion.

Before 9-11, I was part of the U.S. team. I represented the United States at the World Powerlifting Competition in Sofia, Bulgaria. And I got there on September 10, 2001 with my father, Tony Arterburn Sr. And we got to watch the control demolition the next day. September 10th, 2001 with my father, Tony Arterburn Sr. And we got to watch the, uh, controlled demolition the next day. Uh, I was competing, uh, against, and I thought I would have a great meet. That's for another, uh, another story, but I'm, I'm, uh, familiar with USA powerlifting. I was a state champion in a couple of different states. Cause I went around, um, when I was in the military trying to find states to go compete

in. And one of them I think was Michigan so I know a thing or two about USA powerlifting and this is a very fall this is a fall that's been very far from where they were and a very sad story and I'm going to read on but I want to give a little commentary too because it just breaks my heart for all of the hardworking females and female powerlifters that I knew that it was their life. It was their livelihood. It was their passion and still is. And that's being taken away by our Marxian overlords. In his ruling, District Judge Patrick Diamond said the National Powerlifting Organization must cease and desist from all their unfair discriminatory practices. After finding that it had engaged in unfair discriminatory practices by denying transgender weightlifter J.C. Cooper the full and equal enjoyment of public accommodation because of sexual orientation.

Sexual orientation. What does that have to do with being a biological male? What does that have to do with sports? It has everything to do. If you just make all this stuff up as you go along, uh, Cooper, who was born a male filed a complaint with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in 2019.

I remember reading the story then because Ilhan Omar was all about making sure there was no more discrimination here, alleging that the organization had violated the state's Human Rights Act after Cooper was banned for competing in the women's division. Cooper then filed a lawsuit against USA Powerlifting in the state court in 2021 alleging claims of sex and sexual orientation discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The lawsuit, which was filed through a Minnesota-based advocacy group,

Gender Justice, also alleged that powerlifting minnesota had aided and abetted sex and sexual orientation discrimination under the mhra wow well if you don't know anything about powerlifting um if you don't know just how much of an advantage you would have, I mean, it's, I mean, it should be self-evident, you know, if you're born a biological male, your muscle structure, your body fat ratio, your tendon structure, everything is different than a woman because you're built differently.

Men are built for different needs, right? As the hunter, right? That's what we're built for. We're built for different needs right as the hunter right that's what we're built for we're built for that have that strength uh women are built for different things they have different talents uh there are some very strong women i mean just some i met some in powerlifting these are drug-free women uh women that really just wanted to compete and love the the strength sports but you could never really i mean the women's records are nothing like the men's records, and that's just biology. And now they want to take this away. And this is part of the satanic operating system of Marxism,

cultural Marxism. Cooper was separated and segregated. Lawyers for the weightlifters said in the lawsuit that Cooper began powerlifting in 2018 and fell in love with the sport. Miss Cooper. I'm reading this, by the way. Miss Cooper sees powerlifting as a way to find strength within herself, has found a home in a community of strong, supportive women who come together around a shared love of sport. Is that true?

Do the females in the sport, are they happy that there's going to be a floodgate opened up of biological males who identify as female and being allowed to compete in that sport? There's a difference between discrimination and unfair advantage. Nobody's saying that you can't identify or do whatever you want. I'm not going to take part in your fantasy and support that. I'm not going to just go along with it in totality. But no one's saying you can't

this is where you just start to see the rot of culture and it just it breaks my heart because i know i know how hard and this is going to open the floodgates every every every crazy person who just decides and you know south park really nailed this if i had a producer right now, I would put on the South Park episode of the guy with the, you know, it looks like he's macho man, Randy Savage, just going in and just smashing all the records of women's sports and doing everything, you know, and just dominating. And you have to, you have to celebrate that. It's really, it's really Orwellian, isn't it? It goes on to note that Cooper had been training to compete in USAPL Minnesota State Bench Press Championship and the Minnesota Women's State Championship in January and February of 2019, respectively. But in December of 2018, USAPL sent an email to the weightlifter stating that Cooper could not compete because of Cooper's transgender identity. USAPL then revoked her competition card, which means she was not, and we have to keep using these pronouns,

she was not eligible to compete in future USAPL events, the lawsuit states. Diamond ultimately agreed with Cooper's attorneys, the judge here. By denying Cooper the right to participate in the female category, the category consistent with her self-identification, USAPL denied her full and equal enjoyment of the services. Well, you know, it's like I'm 43 now. I think I'm going to compete next month and just have fun. I started seeing what I could deadlift again, because I own a gym here in, in Southern Missouri called Maxfield athletics and training.

It's a little 24 hour gym named after my, my training partner and best friend who died of cancer. He was a Marine. And I mean, he, I can't imagine what he would think about this. He died in 2004. He was 22 years old.

We had no idea all this was coming down. It was going to happen gradually. Then suddenly that we see the decline and fall of Western civilization. And to see this unfair advantage, it'd be like me coming out of retirement and deciding, well, you know, I can't win in the open men's anymore, but just add an A to my name. I'll go from Tony to Tanya. We'll do that really quick, and then I'll go and break all these records. It would just be, that's how insane all this is and so sad.

USAPL has argued that allowing male to female transgender athletes to compete against women was against company policy and that Cooper would have a competitive advantage over natural born women. Yeah, that's common sense. It's called the truth. That's what it is. It's not only unfair advantage, it's wrong. We respectfully disagree. Separately, USA Powerlifting President Larry Maley told

the KARE-TV is considering appealing the decision. Our position has been aimed at balancing the needs of cisgender and transgender women. Well, I mean, you can't really balance that. If you're born a biological male, then you have to compete. You have to dance with the one that brung you.

I'm sorry. That is the way it is. And not everything is your domain. But this is where they just get their, they go and destroy everything. Because nothing will be left. You know, there's no, the, the one refuge that a young person has. And this is, I think this is kind of the spirit of things. Like when you take grown people, adults, and you take your child and you offer them up to the, you know, dancing drag

queen, whatever, right. You take that innocent child who knows nothing of sexuality and all the complications that are going to come from that. And you shove them in front of one of these degenerates, because that's what it is, because you're a degenerate if you want to be sexually explicit or talk about your sexuality in front of a child. You're going to rob them of their innocence. It's all aimed at destroying joy, destroying the ability to overcome things, to self-actualize. Because if you don't have outlets that are decent that you can compete in, I mean, thank God that I had powerlifting as a young man. I mean, and I don't talk about this often.

I was a world-class athlete until two planes and three buildings. I was one of the top athletes in the world in powerlifting. I'd set world records. That all came crashing down because I had to go to Afghanistan and lose 40 pounds. Never was me. I had to get the shots. You have to get your shots. I had to get all my shots.

I had to go invade another country that didn't attack us, didn't want war with us, to strip it of weapons it didn't have. So I didn't have that future. I competed a few more times, but it was nothing like I was. And that's not a sob story. That's just telling you, I had that outlet. I'm grateful. It was all over my office and my library. And here I have plaques on my lifetime drug-free young man who had a lot of intensity. Spoiler alert, I still have it, but it's masked a little bit more eloquently than young Tony. But I had that outlet. I mean, I can't imagine what my life would have been had I not had it. But if you take a sport and you make it to where, you know, it's kind of like everybody gets a trophy, everybody wins. Or if you make it an unfair thing, then what's the point of it?

You know, there's one of these transgenders may figure out that it's kind of like that episode of the Twilight Zone. Where the man gets to, uh, what he thinks is heaven. And, uh, you know, he can't lose anything. Can't lose it. Pool. You know, he went every time he pulls a slot, he wins. Every time he plays poker, he wins, you know, any girl he wants to talk to, she talks back and likes him back. And there's no, there's no challenge. And, uh, he finally tells the guy that he got there, you know, he says, well, what, what, uh, what kind of heaven is this? I'm not really enjoying myself.

He goes, what makes you think this is heaven? Right? You're going to just have, it's a hollow victory. It's kind of like the swimming competitor. And we got to watch that debacle. And they've conditioned women, watch that debacle and you, and you know, they've conditioned women and it just because of their nature. And I think, you know, because we believe in fairness and all this, the mainstream media, our educational system, and they have to clap and applaud.

There's a, I mean, most women I know, I talked to my wife, Melissa, she, she is enraged that a man is the woman of the year, right? I don't think she's the only one, right? This is something that is being taken away from women. They're taking things away from our girls, right? And giving them to, but it doesn't mean that the person that this identify, why do you always have to clarify it? I hate clarifying it too. It's like, oh, if you don't believe in this, then you hate them. No, I don't hate them. I just, you just don't get to do whatever you want. You know, it's be like, well, what if, what if I identified as, uh, it's 15 years old. I mean, the people identify as like, now they have people

identify as like, uh, animals and, uh, different genders. And there's like 800 of them, you know, so you're, you're, where does this end? Well, let's see. It's all the way that you destroy a culture with cultural Marxism is that you just take off all equilibrium. Like there's no real, there's, there's no real rules. There's no, there's no real parameters. It's all floating. And that's how you destroy it. Right? So it's like, if you wanted to identify as a certain age, like I could just go into the, you know, the high school, I could just go into high school and say, well, I, I I'm, uh, I'm back and I I've reversed my age because I believe it.

See, I was born in 1979, but I identify as someone born, you know, in 2009, you get it right. That's, uh, I think that's the logical conclusion here. And it's just heartbreaking. I thought I'd bring that up to you. Just to talk a little bit about, this is the, you're talking about signposts on the road ahead. They're just taking away any avenue for a young person to have real competition, have self-esteem. You know, you just get all your self-esteem from the state, get all your self-esteem from the military industrial complex, for sure. That'll help you out. You can go, we'll just offer you up. Young people will offer you up to the t-shirt man,

and you can go join world war Z. That's how you'll get your, that's how you'll find out who you are. Not through the, you know, peaceful competition of powerlifting or other sports. No, you, you won't be able to do that anymore because there won't be a point in it. They're just going to ruin it and take that away from you. And that really breaks my heart. All right. Let's let's jump around here. All right. Let's, uh,

let's jump around here a little bit. Let's see. I had, uh, Oh, this is Ron Paul. We'll do this. And then we'll talk about the CBDC and then perhaps JFK's speech that got him

murdered by the deep state. Uh, Lou Rockwell.com, I saw this this morning, and I thought I'd add a little bit to Dr. Paul's article. I love Ron Paul. You talk about a consistent human being, a great man, if there ever was one, kind of like David Knight, who has been consistent in his values and never wavered. And I don't agree with Ron Paul on everything. He's not quite enough into conspiracy for me, but that's okay. I think he gets the major points and is a man of peace, which we need more and more of those in the time of war. But he talks about the Federal Reserve's magic trick in big tech.

And there's a few things I wanted to add here, but he has a great article. It says, now you see it, and maybe soon you won't. Over the last year, the seeming ability of stock values and many technology companies to keep rising forever met resistance. This was true even for the major technology companies known effectively as big tech. During the last 12 months, Meta, parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, Amazon, and Alphabet parent company of Google and YouTube suffered layoffs and big declines in stock prices. These were the result of both bad decisions and changing

market conditions. For example, the end of the COVID lockdown obviously reduced demand for Amazon's delivery services. Also, an increasing number of people are leaving Facebook and other meta sites for newer social media sites. Many of those who use social media for political organization, education, or discussion are abandoning Facebook and moving to places like Rumble. The magician in this scenario, the Federal Reserve, played a major role in big and medium and small tech's rise and fall. Technology writer David Streitfield, writing in the New York Times, recently examined how the Fed's 2008 market meltdown related policy of near zero interest rates led many investors to throw money at tech companies. In many cases, these investors would not have bought tech company stocks had the Fed not distorted the signals sent by interest rates, which are the price of money.

The historic expansion of the Fed's balance sheet, thanks to quantitative easing, also helped create a tech bubble. Now that the Fed is raising rates again, although still keeping them below what they would have been in a free market, the tech bubble is being popped as investors are able to get a more realistic view of tech companies' value. This is causing a painful but necessary correction. Well, I agree with him on that. This is the law of fiat currency. This is the cause and effect. When you have a system of fake money, it creates a fake reality. It creates

buildings that would never have been built without the flood of a central bank, fake money, monopoly printing machine. Like the, the companies, the valuations, like we live in an age where the stock market, it's not your grandfather's stock market or your father's stock market. This is something else. This isn't even about profit anymore. And you, you profit anymore. You can list things like ESG, the environmental social governance, which is basically Marxian policy through the central banks and vice versa. That's no longer true. I mean, we bailed out GM a long time ago and then gave them money to get out of their bankruptcy and all that stuff. It has nothing to do with these multinational corporations and especially big tech. But there's just all of this massive buildup of fake wealth.

And people are tied to this system. You get people like Jim Kramer and they're talking about the FANG stocks and everything's great and just keep putting it into tech. But if you don't look at the origin story of our currency, then you've got a blind spot. You've got normalcy bias and it's going to get you and i'm going to get the american consumer has no idea the massive amount of fake on these numbers let's talk about this article this is something that dr paul wrote about he says for example carvana which aimed to be the Amazon of used cars went from $80 billion valuation to $1.5 billion valuation. $80 billion to $1.5 billion value. So this is the fake. You can't really do that and survive. That would be, I mean, you talk about, that'd be like my business. Like, oh, how much is,

how much inventory you have? Well, we, you know, we've got about a hundred thousand and such and such and floating gold and silver inventory. And I'm just throwing out a number. It's not much I have, but then I wake up the next day and you know, nope, nope. I've only got a couple thousand dollars. That's catastrophic. And this is what Ron Paul is saying. That's a 98% loss in just 18 months.

Also, the Fed created a tech bubble and allowed Amazon to lose millions opening new businesses, including physical bookstores. Amazon announced in March of last year, the same month the Fed started increasing interest rates, that it would close all its bookstores. So you had this Trump lockdown. And by the way, side note, we were pumping in trillions before COVID-19 for very subt the overnight known as the repo markets to keep the liquidity up. And then you had to do the lockdown, right? And cause you had to get everybody locked down and cause they needed to pump in the other, just massive, the 80% of all the dollars ever created. And how do you keep inflation from going into hyperinflation?

Well, you keep people from doing too much. You keep them locked down. The tech bubble enabled large companies to grow via mergers and acquisitions. Many small and startup companies attracted investors with a promise of a big payoff from an acquisition. The frequency of tech-related mergers and acquisitions is a major reason behind the left's and some people on the right's renewed interest in antitrust laws oh i'm a big advocate you know i love uh teddy roosevelt had great rhetoric he didn't really bust a lot of trust but wouldn't that be great if we had somebody like that or if we actually if we actually as a culture push back against monopoly uh the federal Trade Commission's chairman, Lena Kahn, owes her position to her advocacy

of using antitrust to limit the growth of big tech. Kahn's crusade against big tech has suffered more setbacks in the courts. However, Kahn need not worry since the Federal Reserve may do more effective job of limiting tech-related mergers and acquisitions than the FTC ever could. Well, sometimes that's the hidden miracle from God Almighty to try to help us out in this jam because big tech is this monster growing its tentacles funded by the government. And these big tech companies, we all know this, you know, DARPA funded their extensions of the government, uh, you know, censoring people, spying on people, uh, you know, you got the, um, the digital public square, um, hand in hand merger with the government, the textbook definition of fascism going on in real time.

And, uh, I like it when they go bankrupt. Does anybody else? I like it when there's this, uh, billions wiped off the, uh, the charts, but that's just nothing new to them. You know, name me a company, um, the out there that one of these big tech companies, are they profitable? Are they, are they profitable? Are they just floating? Because that's what a lot of times you see, oh, it's worth $44 billion,

but they're not in the black. That's not how companies work. Again, that's Marxian central bank crony capitalism. Sam Albasmaid, principal analyst with Guidestone Insights, accurately summed up the tech industry's recent history of Streitfield's article. The whole tech industry of the last 15 years was built upon cheap money. Now they're getting hit by a new reality, and they will pay the price. Federal Reserve-created bubbles and busts are not new to reality.

They have been with us since the Fed was created and will remain until the system collapses or until Congress audits the Fed. Well, I would say, Dr. Paul, it will be until the system collapses because Congress is not going to audit the Fed because there's no way to get to Congress, really. There's no more Ron Pauls. Now, there could be. It'd be really hard to do. But the fact that there are no Ron Pauls should tell you everything you need to know.

It's full speed ahead. The dollar is going not necessarily to zero, but it's going to digital, and that's going to be part of our future. We'll watch that happen. I believe the problem reaction solution will be we have too much. We've expanded the money supply too much, and we've had a lot of these enemies like China and they've been ripping us off. And, uh, even though we gave them everything and rolled

out the red carpet and, you know, send them all the technology and send them all the jobs. No, they did it to us, right? We're not the, you know, we're not, we're not the guilty men. It's the Chinese or it's these other countries. It's whatever it's we're being ripped off. And we have the, we have to rein in the money supply. And we need to control it in real time because we have to protect you. We have to protect your retirement. We have to protect your benefits. So the way that you do this is you just sign up for this digital wallet.

If you'll just sign up. And again, you'll need to you know biometrically uh be associated with your wallet and maybe we'll use the microsoft patent 060606 world patent maybe we'll use that because that ties cryptocurrency to you biometrically giving rewarding you with cryptocurrency maybe a central bank digital currency for, quote, approved activities. Go look that up. The 060606 from your wonderful friend, Mr. Gates, Mr. Bill Gates. All right. Let's and speaking of that. It's something that David has talked about.

Biden's executive order 14067 promoting CBDC is now one year old. Technocracy.news. The devil is in the details. This 10-page executive order sounds innocuous until you get to the definitions section where digital assets is defined as including centralized and decentralized finance platforms or through peer-to-peer technologies. Centralized means that the transaction data is transmitted to a central database for storage and analysis. Article 1, Section 8 Clause of the U.S. Constitution states, the Congress shall have power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and foreign coin, and fix the standards of weights and measures. Biden's EO, executive order, usurps congressional responsibility over currency,

and not one peep was heard from Congress. Well, of course not. We've got the Federal Reserve. It's so federal. And it's a reserve. There's so many reserves. You know, Congress, it was Charles, Charles Lindbergh, senior. And I mean, I wish I had real time. I'd pull up the exact quote. I don't want to butcher it. But after the federal reserve act was passed, I mean, he knew exactly what had happened and Congress just gives up its authority over coinage and over-regulating that. It's funny. Uh, I had, um, and I got to watch myself. I had a customer come in the other day and I just, again, it's just, you catch me off guard and sometimes I'll start the show every once in a while. I'll start my show. It's kind of an involuntary reaction, but somebody handed me a 1963, a $5 bill. Maybe I'll go get it during the break. Um, but it's something interesting on that $5 bill. It, it doesn't say federal reserve note

and it was made in 1963 and uh has picture it has you know obviously it has uh lincoln on the on the bill and the lady said what do you think that's worth and i said well it's not in great condition but it's worth more than five dollars and i said you know why and i said because it's worth more than $5. And I said, you know why? And I said, because it's not a Federal Reserve note. She said, oh, it's not. She looked at the front. I said, you know what else about this $5 bill? This was made through executive order by John F. Kennedy, who we'll be talking about in a minute. And he printed currency direct from the Treasury,

bypassing the Federal Reserve. And I said, there was only two presidents in history that did that. One was Abraham Lincoln with the greenbacks and the other was John F. Kennedy. And they were both shot in the head in public. She said, Whoa, that is, that's disturbing. And I said, and it is interesting that Lincoln's on the picture. He's his face is on the, the bill that JFK put out. I was like, you're not supposed to print things that the bankers don't get something for.

They didn't get to create interest. See, that's the thing that the rabbit hole of the Federal Reserve, folks, is that in order to pay off the debt that we supposedly owe, which I don't really think is real. But let's say we wanted to get the debt down and get our credit rating up. You can't because in order to pay the debt, you have to create more currency, which creates more debt because of the Federal Reserve Central Bank system, which is one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto, if not the number one thing that Marx talked about when in controlling a society because all of his underlings loved it too.

Lenin was that way about if you want to destroy a country first to botch its currency everybody knows that hemingway picked up if you're if you're insightful at all you understand it all tracks back to the currency it tracks back to the money system and the supply itself and fiat is fake it's the head of the snake under this new digital currency any transfer of funds to family friends charity or clients will be able to be tracked by the nation's central bank that issued this virtual money big brother will be in your wallet every hour of every day you will not be able to buy a stick of gum without a federal reserve computer knowing where when and who and how you put down that buck. We should be rightfully concerned about inflation, energy independence, aggressor nations armed with nuclear weapons, and woke public policies that degenerate the very foundation of the great country, but these are jabs compared

to the enormous destructive power of a digital currency option slipped into the executive order one four zero six seven. And isn't it great that if you support a show like this, that it's just an honor for me to fill in for the great David Knight, that he's out speaking on this right now, the real deal. We're not talking about, you know, how great Trump is or some fake Cambridge Analytica, Steve Bannon road to nowhere. We're not doing MAGA. We're not doing LARPing. We're talking

about what matters. I'll break for a second on the subject matter, but it's kind of in the same line. This is what you should be talking about. This is the threat. This is our enemy. And meanwhile, you have alternative media completely ignoring Ron DeSantis and that senator in Florida who wants to make you register as a blogger so you can have the privilege of talking about uh these politicians in florida it's absolutely disgusting so i'm glad to be associated with such a a great show that's dedicated to the truth and you should be too um there's a there's a way that you can support the show and we'll talk about that in a minute because it comes directly from you as listener support we're not supported uh by any sort of nefarious things and we're not supported by lies

it folks you have no idea how much i respect david knight because i know what it takes to build an audience i've been in talk radio for over 10 years and i realized when i started that i had a choice to make because a lot of people that I, but the people that I've were on the same crop, the same class of people that I started with in Dallas, they've gone on to syndication. You know why I'm not syndicated? It's not because I can't speak on the radio. It's because I don't believe the things that they say because they're not true. And it's not that they're bad people. What I'm saying is they chose, they know their audience, they know what they want to hear. They stay within the parameters of that.

And if you go off and you criticize this cult of personality with a Trump or MAGA, or if you just have an independent thought, you are banished and it's not popular and it's not profitable. If you tell your audience what they want to hear, then you can make a lot of money. But if you stick to the truth and analysis, and I watched my numbers fall in 2020, it was actually kind of fun. And there was other things that happened to me that I actually think would make other people upset that I thought were great. And maybe we'll talk about that sometime. Um, I like,

I like my team. I like my group of people. This is a, this Patrick was, is when I was a sparring partner for professional boxers many years ago, I was taught to be wary of the jab. It's a tactic used to distract an opponent while setting him up for a devastating power punch that takes him down for the count.

Biden is throwing jabs. The power punch is the little-noticed executive order with the innocuous number 14067 in its title, ensuring responsible development of digital assets. In the 21st century, where cryptocurrency and cybercrime are now embedded threats of our collective financial security, this executive order would seem to address these issues. This is the jab. In fact, the order includes language that allows the Federal Reserve System to explore the possibility of introducing digital currency into the United States. This means that your cash becomes so much colored paper. That would not be only catastrophic impact on our society and the nation's economy. Under this new digital currency, any transfer of funds to family, friends, charities,

or clients would be able to be tracked by the nation's central bank that issued its virtual money. Big Brother will be in your wallet every hour of every day. You will not be able to buy a stick of gum, like it said. Like any jab, it starts with a feint. At this stage, the Fed is introducing the subject into the public debate and is weighing the options according to Eswar Pazar, a Cornell University economics professor who was interviewed by the Associated Press in August. Apologists for the White House insist that the executive order does not implement digital currency or give washington the power to control it did we does anybody believe that the mainstream perhaps uh assuming this is true what does it is accomplish what does it accomplish

to introduce the possibility or even consider a currency move so radical, so profound, and so disruptive that it makes George Orwell's 1984 nightmare novel a day in the park. We should be rightfully concerned about inflation, energy independence, aggression of nations, all that. I've read that before. It's repeating itself. I'm going to skip down. Executive Order 14067.

This has been slipped into the national consciousness. Nations have risen and fallen far from the battlefield. Their destiny is determined by their economic policies. We should bring our collective outrage to confront even the idea of introducing a digital currency into America's future. If it becomes reality, we will not record recognize our democracy. Well, I'm glad we don't have a democracy,

but, uh, again, that wasn't, uh, that was the, uh, the gate stone Institute and it was republished by Patrick wood.

Um, but yes, it's the end of all things. Matter of fact, we're going to have Charlielie robinson on here very shortly in the third hour i'll talk about a little bit with him perhaps but he's he you know we were talking back in august i was on his show macro aggressions and uh he said this is the hill to die on we're talking about central bank digital currency and i thought it's everything you know it's everything uh it's it's it's so dangerous

that i think that they will reinstall another you know a judas goat i think they'll bring in it's got to be somebody that appeals to the grassroots, that appeals to the right in some capacity. I think that CBDC faces challenges now because there is some glimmers of resistance coming out of Congress. I read that on David's show a couple of weeks ago, and that's great. But what happens if we get another shill for the new world order posing as an anti-globalist do you think cbdc gets pushed through i do that's the danger uh that's why it's uh needs to be talked about regardless of who's running or what kind of cult of personality is talking about things that really don't matter or aren't true all right um let me take a quick break and we'll come back and,

I'll play the commercial one more time. That'd probably be the last time we play it today. So only, only a couple of times. And, um, and we'll talk about the, uh,

speech that got JFK murdered by the deep state. You're listening to the David Knight show. I'm Tony Arterburn broadcasting from the wise Wolf, gold and silver.com studios, along with my co-pilot and co-host Beans the Brave we'll put her on camera here uh toward the end of the show I'm sure she's off to my left off camera having a little bit of a nap and we'll be right back after this break stand by The common man. They created common core that dumbed down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. dot com.

All right. Welcome back. This is the David Knight show. I'm Tony Arterburn. An honor to fill in for the great David Knight. I've been doing this since 2019. I can't believe it. I've learned a lot as a broadcaster, listening to David, a great mentor. And if you see the ease in which he does this, I originally thought, well, I'll do the three hours and I'm so busy at the shop. It's hard to plan a coherent show, a three a coherent show, uh, you know, a three hour show. It's, I mean, it's a full-time job. So, uh, much, much respect. And if you knew, if you were, uh, doing the show, if you were sitting where I am right now, you'd realize that, uh, the amount of work that goes into doing the David Knight

show is, uh, I've tried to do it. Uh, you know, as a, I remember my last time at, uh, when we're at the info war studio in Austin and that was a Friday the 13th, it was in a Friday the 13th in November of 2020. And I got there before anybody else. And I've, I've told, uh, Billy Ray Valentine and others, I'm like, I'm going to, I'm going to blow up this, uh, picture that I have. I need to put it on my wall because I was there.

It was only me and the security guard. And I got there at like 530 in the morning. David got there way earlier than that. And I would get there and have at least two hours to print articles. But I just remember I took a picture of the studio in the dark. And I felt like that was the last time I was going to be there. I had no real reason to believe that. But just after that, we all know what happened.

And then David's been able to grow this show on his own. And the show's gotten better and better and better. And just, it's an amazing journey and proud to be here. And we'll talk a little bit about how you can support the show, thedavidknightshow.com. And of course, davidknight.gold. I will do gold and silver prices here in the show a little bit closer to the end after we talk to Charlie and and we'll make sure we drop all of the all the links and things that. We'll break away from the headlines for a second. This was an article. It's on Zero Hedge. It came out on my grandmother's birthday, so last time I hosted.

JFK's remarkable peace speech that sealed his fate. This is authored by Jacob Homberger via the Future of Freedom Foundation. The deep animosity against Russia and China that the U.S. national security establishment has inculcated in the American people brings to mind the remarkable speech that President Kennedy delivered on June 10, 1963 at the American University that sealed his fate. Just imagine what would happen to any American today who dares to say good things about Russia and China. The Russia haters and the China haters will heap condemnation and they will hate you back. The haters will accuse them of being Putin lovers

who support Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In the case of China, they will accuse them of being Putin lovers who support Russia's invasion of Ukraine. In the case of China, they will accuse them of being communist sympathizers who support China's military expansion. No, there is no room in America for positive sentiments towards Russia and China. through the power of indoctrination, the Pentagon and the CIA have succeeded in inculcating a mind of deep hostility all across America towards both Russia and China. And the China thing's new, as I talked about earlier in the show. Of course, they did the same thing back in the Cold War era,

perhaps even more so given that during that time, both Russia and China were communist regimes. Through the Cold War era, perhaps even more so given that during that time, both Russia and China were communist regimes. Through the Cold War decades, Americans were indoctrinated the same way that Americans today are indoctrinated. They were taught to hate and fear the Russian Reds and the Chinese Reds for that matter, the North Korean Reds, the Cuban Reds, the Vietnamese Reds, the Chilean Reds, the Guatemalan Reds, and as well as the Reds, any, all the Reds in the world, including those who are inside the United States. Among the people where they were expected to hate was Martin Luther King, not only because

he believed to be a Red, but also because he had the audacity to point out that the U.S. government had become the greatest purveyor of violence in the world. They hated him for that, just as they hated Muhammad Ali, who dared to question the war against the Reds in Vietnam. They were both targeted for destruction. In the midst of all this anti-Russia and anti-China hostility, step forward President John F. Kennedy. He'd had enough of all the hostility. Just a side note there, you know, just before JFK was assassinated, they brought him the news that Diem, the leader of South Vietnam, was killed in a CIA-backed coup, and it really bothered him. I mean, he did not authorize that. And he knew what that meant. It's all language. You know, the deep state and the military industrial complex and things that Eisenhower warned us, it's all language.

And they send messages that way. Kind of like the mob, you know, sleeps with the fishes kind of thing. That's something that they sent JFK. He recognized that a destructive and highly dangerous mindset that the Pentagon and CIA had inculcated in the American people. Kennedy realized that in the mindset, that this mindset had brought the world to the brink of an all-out, life-destroying nuclear war during the cuban cuban missile crisis he also came to the realization that the pentagon and the cia had not been had had not been hell-bent on illegally invading cuba there would not have been a cuban missile crisis right had there not been the bay of pigs which is an absolute failure which made him fire Alan Dulles, who was later put on the Warren Commission, right? Because nothing to see here.

Keep some important things in mind. This is what the article says. At the time that Kennedy was delivering his peace speech, the Soviet Union, of which Russia was the principal member, was still occupying and controlling Eastern Europe. It was also still occupying and controlling West Germany. It was still maintaining and enforcing the Berlin Wall. China, North Korea, North Vietnam, and Cuba were still communist regimes.

Kennedy shows up at American University and initiates a surprise attack on the Pentagon and CIA. He declared at the end of the deep anti-Soviet hostilities, he declared that an end to the deep anti-Soviet hostility that the Pentagon and the CIA had inculcated in the American people. He called for a peaceful and friendly coexistence with the Soviet Union and the rest of the communist world with a slap across the face to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He declared, what kind of peace do I mean and what kind of peace do we seek?

Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. It's an interesting phrase, the Pax Americana, it's the American peace. It's like a reference to the pax romana under augustine uh who was the successor to julius caesar you know you talk about and especially in the new testament you know render under caesar and all that that was the the pax romana some people were calling for a pax americana um kennedy and this is going to his speech here, he says, First, examine our attitude towards peace itself.

Too many of us think it is impossible. Too many think it is unreal. But that is the dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable, that mankind is doomed, that we are gripped by forces we cannot control. We need not accept that view. That's an interesting observation, especially as somebody, if you humble yourself before God. You do realize, though, that God gives you, if you seek wisdom and you humble yourself, that God gives you the tools to undo the things that you did. So that is still true, if you have that spirit. I don't think he meant that in a sense of arrogance that man doesn't need God or that we can do anything we want.

Yes, if we are following the true path, if we are really humbling ourselves. I've read this speech and listened to it since I was 24 years old. I've always loved it. And there's something very beautiful about it. No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find communism profoundly repugnant as a nation of personal freedom and dignity, but we still hail the Russian people for their many achievement in science and space, in economic and industrial growth, in culture, in acts of courage. And no nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union

in the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and families were burned or sacked. A third of the nation's territory, including nearly two-thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland, a loss equivalent to the destruction of the country east of Chicago. Talking about the United States. So let us not be blind to our differences, but also let us direct attention to our common interest and the means by which those differences can be resolved. And if we cannot now end our differences,

at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet, we all breathe the same air, we all cherish our children's future, and we are all mortal. The very next evening, June 11, 1963, Kennedy went on national television to express support for the supposed communist Martin Luther King and the American Civil Rights Movement, which the national security establishment, especially the FBI, was convinced was a communist front for a red takeover of the United States. Isn't it interesting? I'll pause here for a second. It's kind of an observation in the Hoover anti-communist led FBI. Isn't that interesting that you look at these,

um, deep state organizations back then and the military industrial complex are apparently anti-communist. What are they now? What does that even mean to them? Like they, they were supposedly, you know,

cold warriors. And we had to, you know, you look at Oliver Stone's movie, JFK, he meets with Mr. X, you know, who had theiver stone's movie jfk he meets with mr x you know who had the uh who had the power who had the motive kubono who benefits you know what's the military industrial complex because they were anti-communist and pro-war you know there was the financial aspect of the deep state as well but now you look at it and they're just globalist wokies. It's the weirdest thing. They're virulent Marxists.

Where was the bend in the river? When did this happen? I don't want either side. Jim Mars had a great breakdown of the modern deep state. Really, the origins of the military industrial complex in Operation Paperclip in the book he called The Fourth Reich, The Rise of the Fourth Reich, about how we'd imported all these, you know, statist Nazis and so on. And they really made up the most virulent anti-communist sect of the military industrial complex post- war ii so it's interesting what happened

i've always been curious there because now you can't find somebody on the right you can't find an anti-communist anywhere in the government i mean where are they uh they don't exist so it's interesting they it's like they just uh morphed into something like they just uh there's metamorphosis of sorts into from anti-communist totalitarian fascist to kind of just fascist in general fascist against freedom itself the president had just thrown down a doubly dangerous gauntlet before the u.s national security establishment. The author of the article goes on and says, I point out in my book and encounter with evil, the Abraham Sabruder story,

uh, Kennedy's peace speech combined with his resolution of the Cuban missile crisis, which enraged the Pentagon and the CIA combined with his support of what was believed to be a domestic communist sealed his fate. Several months later, they took him out on the grounds of protecting, quote, national security, just as they targeted foreign leaders on the same basis. No one in America, and especially not a U.S. president, is permitted to embrace what are considered to be heretical thoughts and policies regarding Russia and China,

the deep anti-Russian and anti-China hostility that the Pentagon and CIA inculcate in the American people has become a permanent part of American life. Well, I like that article because I thought of it years ago. Um, and it, it really does kind of show you how far as a society we've fallen. You talk about excellence and John F. Kennedy was a man. I mean, there was, he has all of his flaws. He's not perfect.

And there's, there's histories, especially if you read his friend was Gore Vidal is actually like, he's somehow related through, he was related. Gore Vidal was related to, uh, to Jacqueline Kennedy, but he knew John and he talked, I believe a lot of what Gore Vidal wrote about JFK. So it's like even more unflattering, but some of the, you know, defects, defects uh get outweighed by things like this we're talking about uh the stance that he took for peace and i don't know i'm not a this isn't a i'm not a kennedy apologist but if you know anything about the uh the cuban missile crisis and just how close we came to oblivion to to real real world war three with, with massive tensions and

how Kennedy ignored his advisors. You know, so much had to go into the Kennedy being president at that time. Now this article may be right. There may have not have been a Cuban missile crisis. Had there been no Bay of pigs in, uh, in 1961, that may be right there may have not been a cuban missile crisis had there been no bay of pigs in in 1961 that may be true um but nevertheless kennedy stopped but what i believe he did stop world war iii uh through a back channel communique with with khrushchev and uh you know khrushchev had the um missiles in cuba uh kennedy knew that we had the missiles in Turkey called the Jupiter missiles.

They traded them. They swapped them out. And it was supposed to be six months later, delayed reactions, all the rest, but both offensive weapons. And he tamped down. And that's what scares me about today. You have somebody like JFK who this kind of rhetoric, I mean, he wrote this, if not, you know, in collaboration with others, but he wrote this. And you look at somebody now, we have Biden, a Fetterman, you have, you know, in the realm of politics, you know, and we got the orange man, theastic hubristic you know i you know my hands aren't that small guy you know he's got all that i mean just just none of this is beauty and rhetoric

in him it's all ugly right and then you have i mean the sign of the times is you got uh men going and competing in women's sports and we're calling it beautiful it's really is kind of an endgame, cultural Marxism. You get to watch a culture fade. It's like the William Butler Yeats poem, that the best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passion and intensity. And it's haunting, isn't it? But yeah, this was a great, this was a great speech and something that I think we could all rally around.

Um, because war is the health of the state. It's more than just Smedley Butler talked about war as a racket that books on my shelf behind me. It's more than just a racket. It's the function. It's the lifeblood. It's the alma mater of the evil, the nefarious entities that run this country now. Alma mater means nourishing mother, where you come from. Everything is born out of war. You know, they, the war is funded by fiat currency and fiat currency survives because of war. They're symbiotic. If you look at the simulations that are running, they're trying to figure out what,

why are we, why are we setting up Russia and China to fight them? Well, because we need to retain the world's reserve currency. The only way to do that is to reset the grand chessboard. We're not going to fight them. Well, because we need to retain the world's reserve currency. The only way to do that is to reset the grand chessboard. We're not going to win that. Uh, the bricks nations,

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa are 40% of the world's population. We are 5%. We have written treaties that a long ago needed to lapse. We have,

uh, we have again committed this nation on paper. We have a bankrupt foreign policy so that none of this can survive. And, uh, none of this is sustainable. If we pulled back right now and went back to first principles and, and,

and obeyed the constitution, we could save this country. We would have to dismantle the empire. We'd have to reset our currency. We'd have to give a commitment to free markets to turn the engine back on. We'd have to send a lot of people to jail. We'd have to, there'd be a lot. I think we'd have to build new jails for the amount of deep state degenerates

who have run this country and do the ditch. But I don't think we have, if we don't have the moral will to keep men from competing in women's sports, then I don't think we're going to turn the country around anytime soon. We may have to get, we may have to like an alcoholic has to hit rock bottom. We may have to get all the way to the bottom, ladies and gentlemen, before we can do anything different. All right. We're waiting on Charlie Robinson.

Oh, just as I said that, Charlie Robinson, he's in the back office. He pops up. It's like he's reading my mind. He's inside my mind. Let's put Charlie Robinson on the screen here. Good to see you, my friend. Good to see you. I am not reading your mind i don't think i know that

we didn't we didn't buy the same neuro link unit from elon musk so i know we're not connected yet uh but yeah let me i was going to introduce you this is the author of the octopus of global control uh the control demolition of the american empire uh And what was the other hypocrisy? Hypo crazy. I got that. I got that on my, my shelf behind me, but good to see you,

my friend. Good to see you. Have we figured, have we figured out all the solved all the world's problems yet? I've, I've, I've merely listed a, a fraction of them.

And then without, I'm much like the philosopher, Frederick Nietzsche. I can tell you all the things that need to be taken down, but I cannot tell you how to build them up yet. So we'll start with the premise that you and I texted back and forth yesterday. And I said, Charlie, what do you, anything you want to talk about and what what uh what's on your mind and you go where do we begin and i thought that's pretty funny i mean it feels like the wheels are coming off of everything you know and and to recognize it is to be called a crazy conspiracy theorist but the evidence is everywhere

it's like we've the general public has like a blinder in front of them. They can't see what's, what's happening or they don't want to see what's happening. And it's really frustrating because I feel like this is a time when you would think we could kind of rally the troops and get everyone to say, Hey, listen, things are going off the rails. Like maybe we should all be paying attention. And yet you've got a large segment of society that just refuses to recognize what's right in front of their face. It's very frustrating. Yeah, it's that normalcy bias. I've been talking a lot about that.

And people are kind of just stuck in this same mode over and over, kind of expecting things to return to like 2019 era normalcy. And that's just not going to happen because we're not, we're not any kind of normal times because this was not an organic thing that happened to us the last three or four years. This has been a planned event, which is clear. I mean, now that we look back and you see all the simulations and all the things that all the key things that had to happen to get us here in this current reality.

So, you know that it's manufactured and it's on purpose. So I think people are just really just trying to figure out where things are. I was talking this morning about the headlines on Drudge, and you know this as good as anybody. The headlines on Drudge talking about the tensions with China. We're making that. We're making the tensions with China, which is even more bewildering because we set China up like the, through the seventies, you know, giving them, uh, opening them up or by the way, and then you have the trilateral commission being formed to have this new Asians,

uh, century, we'd lost all of our manufacturing, uh, the Clinton era bags of cash, the most favored nation status in 2001 by the Bush administration. And so it's over and over again, we see, uh, the, you know, the Chinese being propped up and mean, uh, Dianne Feinstein's driver was a Chinese spy, all this stuff. But the balloon, Charlie, the balloon, they're going to find all about us with the balloon. And yeah, it's all manufactured. It certainly does feel that way.

And China has been simultaneously our biggest trading partner and the biggest boogeyman that we've created. We've always got to have an enemy that's just around the corner that's going to get us unless we give up our rights and pay more taxes, of course, or accept more restrictions put on our ability to conduct business or travel or talk to one another or whatever. So China is just this convenient boogeyman that's rolled out from time to time to scare people back into, oh, we've got to fund the military industrial complex. Listen, America doesn't need to... We're protected for the most part. We've got some pretty nice obstacles called the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. That does a really good job of keeping us protected from a seaborne invasion.

I'm not so worried about that. I think I'm more worried about us being hollowed out from the inside by American politicians that aren't acting in the best interest of America, that maybe are compromised or are doing so at the behest of other countries. And it's not limited to China, of course, and there's others that have undue influence inside America. But when Berwick and I wrote Controlled Demolition of the American Empire, we were talking about how you think that you're going to take down a country or take down an empire right away. It's going to be a quick process. And we sort of argued that if you want to do it the right way, you have to pre-weaken it. You have to pre-weaken this building from the inside. You have to sign onto these policies like NAFTA, and you have to hollow out the country from from the inside by getting rid of their industrial capacity and getting rid of their, you know, creating a school to prison pipeline, which which hollows out the social component of a lot of the big cities, you know, puts dads in prison on disproportionately long prison sentences in private prisons, which of course they own.

So we're sort of at this point now where we're 30 years into this plan to hollow out America. And we're getting to a position where you don't even really have to push down the plunger to set off the detonators. You just have to kick in the front door and the entire rotten structure is going to come down. And I feel like that's kind of where we are right now. Our money is worthless. Our word is worthless. We're the boogeyman all over the place. I mean, we clearly see what's going on in Ukraine. Ukraine has to be the biggest priority in the world. We have to give them everything they asked for. If they asked for our firstborn, we have to give it to them. They actually did recently ask for that, but, but don't pay attention to Ohio. Don't worry about those people. Those people are flyover people. We don't care about them. What are they're just dumb, white, Christian, Republican,

conservative, no, nobody's. We don't care about them. Let's focus on Zelensky. And I think even the average person is watching this going, why is this a priority to us? Like if this is supposed to be America first, which it's not, I've got an episode coming out tomorrow called America last. So it's kind of on my mind. But if this is supposed to be the plan where we're supposed to take care of ourselves first, and then once we're sort of buttoned up, then we can go help these other nations around the world. And you see overt disasters happening inside America and you go, yeah, let's fix this one. Flint, Flint, Michigan, no water. Um, uh, Alabama or was it Arkansas ran out of drinking water, right? They had bottled water for like a long, long time. Palestine,

Ohio, there's a big train derailment. It's a big, it's a mess. Can we get the president to focus on this? He's like, why? He's in, he's, he's, he's focusing on Ukraine. Ukraine first, America last. That's where we are. And I think people are starting to wake up to this. I agree.

And I think it's on purpose that they wake up to it in a sense, but also have that psychological damage of of being feeling helpless like we're just like you use the term and i think nixon used this as back in the 70s called us a pitiful giant like we have all we just can't we can't fix these problems this happened to the soviet union you look at the in the invasion of afghanistan in 1979 they were considered you mighty Soviet Union. The United States was actually considered second-rate militarily at the time under Jimmy Carter, and they had that term called malaise.

And throughout the 1980s, you had the funding of the Musha Hadin. We had the database known as al-Qaeda. We had Tim Osmond out there helping kill Russians that we were funding illegally through the CIA and third parties. They were losing in Afghanistan at the Stinger missiles. So you had this nuclear power that was being rattled and put off base by these uh supposed farmers and freedom fighters then you had chernobyl you know and then so chernobyl was a it's like this massive psychological blow that they i mean it was a problem that this like erupted and they you know have really messy and how they fixed it it's i mean it's still radioactive all all that you had chernobyl and you had um the fact that that gorbachev uh at Reykjavik with Reagan,

they couldn't compete with SDI. We made this thing up, the Strategic Defense Initiative. As you know, the Star Wars wasn't really real. We just made it up. It's like a boondoggle. We're going to start funding it. But they took us supposedly at our word. Depends on how far you want to go down the conspiracy rabbit hole

of whether the Cold War was a big thing, whether it was fake or not i don't know um but it does remind me of that like that we just look pitiful and people are supposed to believe that we can't you know for some reason like the american spirit is still there charlie like i know that like you're not when you're talking about the controlled demolition of the american empire you and i both agree the american empire is a detriment to the american republic it's actually oh yeah empire is a detriment to the American Republic. It's actually, it's actually harmful to the American people. So we're not talking about anti-American stuff.

We're talking about the psychopaths who built this structure that we don't need, uh, that actually limits our freedom, that, that puts the state against us, that creates a Patriot act, that targets Patriots,

that it creates the department of Homeland security and all these other, these and all these other unnecessary agencies to spy on us and imprison us. We understand that the American Republic is under attack by that. The American people are still great. We're just not allowed to be. We're not allowed to fix our problems. You look at the train derailment and everything that goes on, the water in Flint, the infrastructure that we fly over the United States, our airports, our roads, our bridges, all the things that Trump talked about and didn't do anything about.

I mean, we are just, again, being robbed of our future. There is no doubt. You can't look at this and not see the words on purpose. I just can't see how any normal person could look at the evidence and say, wow, this was a plan. This is not a plan. This is just by, we're just, we're just, you know, slowly rolling downhill. No, it's, it's been accelerated. And can you feel the acceleration, Charlie? I mean, can you feel that? I can. Yeah. Yeah. Like they're on a, on a, a shortened timeline now. Like, Hey, wait, you know, we've heard the 2030. Well, by 2030, it feels like it's been sort of

condensed a little bit more. They're moving faster. And actually, I would suggest that that might be a good thing because the faster we get them to move, the more we get them off their timeline, the greater the chances that they make mistakes that they wouldn't normally make. So I'm hoping for that, but we'll see um i agree with you remember the remember the uh presidential election and uh and uh the little 2020 and all the primaries leading up to that and you had like uh people like beto o'rourke and you know and aoc and people that were out there and bernie and they everybody kept saying or even biden he like, we only have 11 years to fix this problem. And I kept going, what's in 11 years. And, you know, in 2019, it was the agenda 2030. And we have 11 years, the world's going to end with 11 years. And if you backed up, you know,

before that you'd heard people in 2016, 17, we only have 13 years. And I'm like, it's, it's all based on the timeline. It's so overtly on purpose that they're fine. I don't know how much of that they even understand that they're following it, but clearly there's an agenda there. I'm hoping we can avoid it without war. I think that when they, when they start down this path, we have to realize like the WEF and man, you,

you had a, you talked about on one of your shows, just like the, the strangeness of the WEF people, like the World Economic Forum. Like, that's dealing Davos. I mean, these people are not like super bright. They just have control of all the fake money. It just makes them look smart.

You know, like they have their hands in the pockets of all these, you know, politicians and so on and so forth. It makes them look like they're powerful. They kind of are, but they're just not that bright. And I think they create variables, you know, because they're not God. I mean, they can, they can plan. Um, there's that old saying that, that man plans and God laughs. That's kind of funny. I think, I think about the world economic forum and the great reset uh klaus schwabian folks they set all this stuff in motion and it's kind of scary because if you look at uh ukraine and russia conflict i think a lot of our elites think well you know our rainbow flag is going to triumph you know like if we just give enough to the t-shirt man uh if we just offer up enough billions or send them f-16s you you know, that we'll win this thing. But we haven't won a war since World War II.

So I don't know, like, statistically, it's not looking good. No, it's not. It's not going to win. But, again, I think they have this arrogance that puts other things in motion. And that's what I'm concerned about now is that they may not have understood everything that they've done. And, you know, with supply chains and with the global, I mean, the global economy. And you've talked about on your, a lot of your analysis is brilliant on macroaggressions. I urge everybody, if you haven't heard of Charlie, if you don't follow Charlie, go follow Charlie.

He's got great shows. It's very consistent. It's very, it's in-depth. It's a thinking man show. And I really love it. There's so much. There's so great shows. It's very consistent. It's very, it's in-depth. It's, it's a thinking man show. Uh, and I, I really love it. Um, there's so much, there's so much there. I think they didn't plan on Charlie that I, that it's really come into fruition. Well, I had been recently on a heater about the trilateral commission, right? You know, how their, their, their, you know, their goal is to, you know, it had, you know, as it started, it was more like, let's manage this from a financial standpoint for

this world government. And then it became like, well, we're going to do that, but also we got to get rid of this concept of the nation state and sovereignty. This is outdated. We don't need this. So let's open up the borders. And so you go, well, so who are the trilaterals, right? Well, there's a rule with the Trilateral Commission that you can't be an active member while you're serving in government. So you put your membership on ICE and you rotate into whichever administration is the one that's just coming into power. So in the case of the Biden administration, you get Jake Sullivan and Susan Rice and people like that that come in, and Anthony Blinken, right? And they come in, they're trilaterals. And then what do they do? Leave the Southern flank wide open. And you go, I have a question. Why aren't we defending our

Southern border? There's 5 million people that have come across in the first two years. Why isn't the president down there making a big deal about it? Why are you removing all the barriers? And the president says something like, come on, man. Come on, Jack. I'll send Kamala down there. And Kamala goes down there and tries to give you a description about time. She tries to explain to you about space or school buses. And you go, stop the insanity.

The border's open. Can we do something about that? And you go, well, hang on. And then you look at it and you go, these are trilaterals. They want the border open. It's part of their plan. They're not trying to shut it. They want it open. So we're here rattling, you know, we're freaking out saying that, that, that they're, you know, that it's, they're accidentally leaving it open. And my analysis is that it's no accident. It's part of the plan. And then what I started doing is I started looking into something that I thought was completely disconnected. And I found a strange overlap. I was doing an episode that I just recorded yesterday that hasn't come out yet on Cecil Rhodes, right? Cecil Rhodes, you want to talk about white supremacist ideas, you know, not these imaginary ones that the left

is looking for behind every Starbucks. I mean, this is an actual guy, right? With a ton of money and influence and power in the late 1800s. And he forms this group called the Rhodes Scholars, right? And part of what the Rhodes Scholarship was about, now keep in mind, this is 100 years ago when the British Empire was a big, big deal. But the plan was, how do we, you know, let's unite English speaking white nations together first and foremost, and let's all come together as this first clicking up part of the one world government. But if that was mission one, mission 1A was, oh, and by the way, let's send some highly trained elites to infiltrate

the United States and destroy it from the inside so that it can eventually be folded back into the British empire. So then you go, okay, well, that into the British empire. Right. So then you, you go, okay, well, that's the road scholarship program. And you go, well, well, well, who, who's a road scholar, right? Oh, I always just thought it was smart people that want to put it on their resume. And yeah, you've got to be smart, but you have to have a certain ideology. So what happens is after for pro postgraduate, they take about a hundred of these people a year. For postgraduate studies, they take them to the University of Oxford and they give them a training on this ideology, the ideology of Cecil Rhodes, which is white

nationalism. Let's reunite the English speaking world into a one world government. Oh, and by the way, we're going to train you here in England, but we're going to send you back to the United States so that you can destabilize it from the inside. And you go, okay, well, so who's on this list? Bill Clinton, NAFTA, deregulating the telecom industry, which allowed 50 media companies to click up into five to more easily be controlled. Deregulating Wall Street. I mean, putting in place the private prison system. Running the largest cocaine trafficking enterprise in the world in the 80s with George H.W. Bush, CIA, and me in Arkansas? I mean,

this guy's a massive destabilizer. But let's look at what about presently? What about currently? Who's destroying the country from the inside? Well, how about some of these names? Pete Buttigieg. That's right. Our transportation secretary. Isn't it funny how he just doesn't seem to care about America at all? It's almost like he's been sent here on a mission to destroy it from the inside. Wink, wink. What about Chesa Bowden? Soros is installed woke district attorney weirdo in San Francisco who decriminalized everything. Decriminalized crime. everything to criminalize crime right and then crime went through the roof walgreens and cvs closed up and moved out target isn't target doesn't uh stay open past six o'clock anymore because they can't because guys are just coming in and looting the place in broad daylight

knowing that the police won't show up. What about Jake Sullivan, national security advisor, trilateral guy? He's a Rhodes Scholar as well. You go through this list and you go, Eric Garcetti, mayor of Los Angeles. What's going on there? Chrystia Freeland in Canada, that psychopath World Economic Forum, young global leader, minister of finance, who's destroying Canada from the inside. You start looking around, you go, Susan Rice, Rhodes Scholar, and you go, what is going on here? It becomes less conspiracy theory and more conspiracy analysis when you start to ask questions about, okay, I have a strong suspicion that these people are sent here to destroy America intentionally, that this incompetence cannot be just sort of brushed aside as well, you know, the Rumsfeldian, well, mistakes were made. No, no, no. This isn't

accidental. This is intentional. And I think that people need to sort of, you know, Michael McFaul, U.S. ambassador to Russia, Rhodes Scholar, you know, making decisions and saying things to drum up war with Russia. Why would you be doing that? So I think there's a lot of people that need to be brought in for questioning on this. And I don't think it's accidental. And when that episode comes out in a couple of weeks, I encourage people to go over to Macroaggressions and listen to it because I think that there is, it's the only explanation for what we see is that this is being done intentionally because at some point the incompetence would, would get rooted out. People would recognize it, but it seems like it's just wave after wave after wave of people that come in and are propagandizing us, uh, or, or destroy, just making policy decisions that don't benefit America. It's really frustrating to watch. You're so right about the Cecil Rhodes

and the Rhodes Scholarship. And I've talked about this before, and I love when I talk to smart people like you, and I remember stuff that I thought I'd forgotten. It's the extension of the British Empire by other means. You go back to the War of 1812, and we're still messing with the British, still having to deal with them.

They burned the White House to the ground. And then two years still, you know, having to deal with them. They burned the white house to the ground. And then two years later, Andrew Jackson, I mean, just decimates the British in new Orleans. And then Andrew Jackson hated the British and he hated bankers, which he kind of thought was the same thing. I mean, the British soldier had cut Andrew Jackson with a sword when he was 14 years old. And he was in, during the revolutionary war, he hated the bankers, hated the British. hated the british and

that was you know the the period of history i was talking about so many people don't see america as great unless we have an empire especially modern people and people that call in to talk radio i would be bombing someone you know it's all about war and i was saying well the country was great you know we had periods of history where it was worth fighting and dying for before we had an empire. Go back to the, you know, post-Civil War 19th century. You know, we didn't have a central bank. We didn't have an income tax.

We didn't have social security numbers. You go set up your business. I mean, yeah, it wasn't perfect. And there was corruption and there was discrimination. There was all these things. But, you know, all of the systems that we got in the 20th century really track back to these British, like Cecil Rhodes. He's the only person in history who had three countries named after him and a dog. You have the Rhodesian Ridgeback.

I think it was Rhodesia, South Rhodesia. I forget. There were three different countries in Africa that were named after Cecil Rhodes. He set up what you mentioned, the Rhodes Scholarship, but it was the Masonic Roundtable. It was the secret society he set up to interlink the British, everything that happened to us beginning in the early 20th century with the creation of the Federal Reserve and the influence from, I mean, let's just face it. I mean, Cecil Rhodes left his fortune to the Rothschilds, which, you know, the diamondies and people like, um, Don Jeffries calls Pete Buttigieg mayor buttcheeks and stuff. This makes me laugh because these people serve all these woke Marxian agendas. And if you look at Pete, you know, Pete's life and his professor and, uh, the people he had in, um, in, in college to teach him, they all follow all this stuff. But, uh, Cecil Rhodes was, uh, was very much a, if you want to talk about real white supremacy, I mean, you know, the white man's burden and Robert Kipling and that poem, like he took that to heart.

Like that's what they needed to do is interlink the English speaking worlds. And he was trying to do what the Trilateral Commission did back, you know, he was trying to do back then what the Trilateral Commission has seemed to have accomplished in our time, which is an end run around sovereignty, around national sovereignty, the end run around it. And that was creating these organizations inside to link up the two countries. And that culminated, in my opinion, in the Council on Foreign Relations. I mean, after World War I, our country still had the Senate. A lot of them were still holdovers from the time before we had a 17th Amendment, before the bankers elected. Because it used to, the legislature would appoint the senators. So we had more of a robust reflection of what the state's politics actually were. It was very slow moving.

And at that time, we rejected the League of Nations. So upon that, the Council on Foreign Relations was born in order to, and you talk about the Trilateral Commission, the Trilateral Commission is made up of people that are from the Council on Foreign Relations. One kind of goes with the other, but these are British institutions. The Rothschilds, the banking houses, it still stems from this rotting British empire, which I'm not a fan of. You talk about all of our history and Churchill. I think Gore Vidal made fun of England after World War II. He said they became an aircraft carrier for the United States.

That's basically what they've become. However, we were absorbed into them by this. I'm great. I'm glad you brought that up because it is something to marvel at. Everything has been an inside job. Everything's been from the inside. We always talk about external threats, but as I like to say, kind of comically, that the calls are coming from inside the house. Yeah, they are. And it's funny because I've been working on, I'm going to work on this episode as well called the House of the Rising Scum, which is about Chatham House, which is AKA Royal Institute of International Affairs. Now their sister organization is the Council on Foreign Relations. These were started by the British monarchy, Cecil Rhodes, in the early 1900s, the same year that Royal Institute for International Affairs, actually, it was originally

called the British Institute for International Affairs. It later got its royal charter a couple years later and changed the name to Royal Institute of International Affairs, is aka Chatham House. And Chatham House and the CFR are one in the same. They're just different franchises of this. And that ideology of Cecil Rhodes goes right through this. And, and I'll tell you one thing that I discovered during my exploration of, of who this guy was, was that for all those Wokians that, that think that you know, that their side can, can do no wrong. And, uh, I I'd like for you to understand that Cecil Rose was a closeted homosexual as well. In fact, in that whole group of guys that were running it, it was known that that whole sort of circle, that round table

circle of, of fellows were, were sort of into the domination of other men, both physically, financially, spiritually, and also sexually too. So it gave them part of this power over other people. It's a real dark area that you go into when you start dealing with people that get off on domination and every sort of aspect of it. And you don't like to think that America has those sort of influences. We like to think that America's the good guy or that we have these morals and that we uphold them. And I think a lot of the people do. And I think a lot of the people identify with that. Unfortunately, I don't think our leaders do. I think that when you've got people that you have to question their loyalty, Pete Buttigieg's of the world and Susan Rice's, these people do not appear to me are set to burn down this country. And the ideology that they're aligned with is incompatible with American ideology.

But they're installed. And what I learned about this when researching into Rhodes Scholars is that they basically just said that, look, we're going to take over politics, media, academia, and the judiciary with our people. We'll just install them in positions of high power, regardless of whether or not they're smart. I don't deny that these people, the intellectual horsepower is there. I just don't appreciate, I don't think that they come from the right place in terms of their ideology. So they're smart people, obviously. You're not going to be in this group unless you're a smart person, but that doesn't equate with being a good person. And unfortunately, these people have been sent to really hollow us out from the inside. And it's a shame. And yeah, I look back on this and I think, geez, did we really get our

independence from the British? Or maybe this is like, maybe on the surface, maybe they took off the chains, but the ideological chains remain and that the British influence never truly went away. And they did to us what we did to the black slaves, which is we said, you're free, but you're really not. You're under economic slavery and government slavery and fiat slavery. And we're just going to change it from overt control to covert control because it works much better when the livestock believe that they're free. And so I'm wondering if the British influence ever went away. They definitely tried over and over again to get that foothold back with the Bank of the United States. And you uh, you look at, uh, Andrew Jackson, his, his proudest accomplishment, he wanted it on his tombstone. I killed the bank.

You know, he called the international bankster class. He said, you're a den of vipers and thieves. I'm going to route you out. And Jackson spoke at an Archipelago. We need to talk about an Archipelago here in a second, but it, yeah, it was interesting. You talk about where we didn't have influence. There was a wide swath of the American time frame, and I talked about it in the first hour, where we just kind of had this quasi, almost real republic. There was an interlude with the Civil War. But I know I have this right.

I'll have to make sure I fact check it after the show, but the bankster JP Morgan was born in 1836. And I think he died in 1913. His life, I think was the entire expansion of his life was the B the end and the beginning of the central bank from the second bank, United States with Andrew Jackson and then culminating in the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. So we had this interlude, but everything after that, like they got their foothold in.

And it's the secret societies and international banking cartels, really through the British influence, that made all this possible. Like the influence that they have through the Council on Foreign Relations, these supranational bodies bodies and they're in secret you know it's something that um you know they talk about that i talked about the speech that uh got jfk murdered he actually had more than one you know it was the american university speech about peace which that is like you don't have that it's a crucifix to a vampire man for for the military industrial complex. They, they hate that word. There's no profit. How'd they get going to control people?

How are you going to indefinitely in prison somebody, Charlie, if you can't have a war power going on. So it's, it's just interesting. You have that speech, but he also had that speech on, you know, secret O's and secret societies and, you know, uh, you know, the, the behind closed doors and in the, in the, uh, the dark of night and what of night and what we do by day, they do by night. That's really been the history of these organizations and the Rhodes Scholarship and placing people. It's kind of like Soros does with these district attorneys. And again, you get people like Fox News who cuts off Newt Gingrich when he starts to mention that, hey, Soros funds this.

Oh, you can't talk about who funds it because then the game's over. So you got to keep everybody in the game, Charlie. The game is the left-right paradigm, team blue versus team red. And they don't talk about how the things are funded by the same people. It's a game, right? With you in the middle and we're the ones that are held hostage by these by this thing that isn't real you know they'll they'll get to the edge of the truth and then stop it's kind of like a gain of function which we you and i would both agree needs to be eradicated

if you're working on making a virus more deadly like you should be in prison like this is just you should you should go to jail like you should be prosecuted because you're a you're a operation paperclip nazi scientist is what that what you are at that point um but we talk about the lab leak oh it's a lab leak oh it's a lab leak yeah probably uh and we talked about that in alternative media we were shut down for it to say well this is most likely you know look at the origins of the virus but but we're, we're focusing on that. So we're getting close to the truth, but they just want the, and that's a gatekeeper. Yeah. Because really we can all, we all know what happened in 2021. We all know what really went on after the year of the, you know, the worst virus in

the history of ever. So we're going back to try to shroud everything that happened afterwards. We're trying to take you back to say, oh, it's the lab leak and it's Fauci. Well, there's some of that's true, but it was the lockdown and the real bioweapon. The real bioweapon is the jab. The real bioweapon is the thing they're still pushing. And everybody knows. When did you know somebody that got sick from whatever covid

supposedly was i know because i pay attention everybody got sick in 21 people got sick i got i got sick last year from from covid the very end of the year and that's when i first realized like this is weird like you can't taste anything you get you sweat all the time at night it's weird like i never really had that as the flu so I know it's something different. It's something novel, but I'm not so worried about that. I'm worried about what they made in their response to it. I'm worried about Operation Dark Winter. I'm worried about these simulations. I'm worried about the control, but that we just get to the edge of it. That's the issue. That's the issue with all of these policies

put in place by these secret societies and these supranational bodies. It's just to keep the game going. Who funds it is not really important to the mainstream media. Who controls it is not important. What is important you get narrative managers like George Stephanopoulos and Lena Wynn who come out there and tell you that you have to be afraid. Both Rhodes scholars, right? Both installed to perpetuate a myth at some point in the future. We have the sparse pandemic document that came out in 2017 that simulated the outbreak of a novel coronavirus that sweeps the world. Killing 65 million people before a vaccine is the only thing that can come in and save it. And in that document, what do we have? We have emergency use authorization, speculated and used. This is 2017, right? We'd never considered that before. We have lockdowns. That was never an option before. It's in there. We have fictional rappers and celebrities saying, hashtag vaccines work.

And what do we see in real life? Hashtags vaccines work. We see a rollout of an emergency use authorization used for vaccines. They come out, a massive promotional push in the spars in the fake spars pandemic document from 2017 that simulated something that was going to happen in 2025 we see the vaccines roll out we see it become undeniable that they're killing people and making a lot of people sick we see outrage in the public and then the sacrificial lambs are banished as that document, as that 75 page document ends, you get to the tail end, becomes undeniable that the vaccine was actually what was killing

everybody. And you find that the head of the CDC, the fictional celebrity doctor, the Fauci character, and all the celebrities that endorsed it are run out of society. What do we have right now? Fauci's starting, the heat is starting to get cranked up a little bit on Fauci. Oh, you know, mistakes were made. You know, they're starting, oh, here's the hidden messages from Matt Hancock. Here's the email where Fauci is trying to, you know, his finance is telling this guy, listen, don't go with that lab leak theory, change your report. Oh, now you magically have money. It's coming out,

right? It's following a script. And that's what makes me really nervous is because it feels like none of this is organic and it's limited hangouts coming out now. Now it's like, well, we have to investigate whether or not it accidentally came from a lab. Who? Accidentally? There's nothing accidental about this. this six months beforehand with Bill Gates, CDC, Johns Hopkins, the CIA, the mainstream media, the Chinese CDC, all sitting in this meeting in October of 2019, speculating about a virus that's going to come out and kill everybody. And then you've got plushies that you give out that are

of a coronavirus, plushies that you give out at the event. I mean, at some point there's just a little bit too much advanced knowledge for my liking. And to point this out is to, you know, is to out yourself as somebody that's not on team America. You must want to kill grandma, or maybe you're a right wing,

uh, conspiracy theorist, or maybe you're a Trump supporter. You just like Trump, you, blah, blah. Whatever sort of insult they can attach to you, they do that because they've got to protect this narrative. Like you said, the narrative comes out and the narrative remains until it doesn't, until they pivot to something new. Oh, look, shiny Ukraine over there. Focus on Ukraine. Oh, stand with Ukraine. Stand with Ukraine. Don't worry about COVID. We've got it taken care of until the next distraction. Oh, we got to worry about Taiwan. Oh, there's Taiwan. China's making moves. Now we've got to focus on Taiwan. Do we invade Taiwan, Tony, next week,

the week after that, or three weeks from now, and then that gets put through the echo chamber, nine months of CNN and Fox and MSNBC and the BBC talking about when, when do we really get in there and defend, you know, when do we invade China and defend Taiwan? And they get you distracted and you get a couple, you get a year down the path and you go, wait a second.

I have a question. Are we going to ever prosecute these people for COVID? And they're like, well, you know, listen, we can't live in the past, Tony. We're charting a course forward. You know, I could see Rumsfeld in my mind, go standing up there and going, mistakes were made, you know, and going mistakes were made you know and undoubtedly mistakes were made but but if we're going to move on and be the country we need to be we need to chart a course forward moving forward moving you know in the thumb you know we got to move forward you just go

it's all theater you know and so it's very frustrating i'll tell you it's very frustrating to be aware of this because when you're aware of it, you see it everywhere. You see the scam and I'm not trying to say that I have it all figured out, but I mean, you, you understand who the players are. You understand sort of where their backgrounds are, what they want, and they start to talk and you go, this is, this is making me feel very uncomfortable. So, so Fauci's going to get sacrificed and we, and it's not my, it's not my opinion that he's going to get

sacrificed. I've read the script. It's the spars pandemic document. He gets sacrificed at the end of this. I already, I already read the script. I've seen the movie before it's been made. So, so that's where we're going with it. We, we did, I did episodes on this two years ago saying, I hope it doesn't come true, but so far up to this point, it's coming. And then I did another one a year later saying, well, it's still on track. It still looks like we're in act two of this three act play. And when we get to the third act, that's where it culminates.

And, you know, and, you know, we, we, we go and we get these people and we banish them because they led us down the wrong path. It wasn't accidental. We know this. So they planned for it. And if you can control the narrative, then you have a pretty good chance of controlling the opinions of the general public. You'll never control our opinions. We'll always sort of pick this out and David's audience knows. I mean, these are people that are aware of what's going on. So they're, they're, they're, they're not going to get tricked into this, but the vast majority of people that are working two jobs and trying to get the kids ready for school in the morning and come home exhausted, turn on the news. They listen to it for 20 minutes.

They think they know what's going on. They're never going to figure it out. No. And if you have the historical background, not saying that I do, but I've been studying this for years, kind of like you have and doing the research, you have, you have a different map. So you're looking at this, you know, this is different territory to you as opposed to if you just got fed, which is something interesting that my friend Kenzie French files talked about going to the feed, like getting your feed from the news feed, like you're just like an animal showing up and getting that feed. So if you, if you don't buy that, you know, and it's like the next thing it's like, it's, it's getting

ridiculous. Like, Oh, we have unvaccinated UFOs that are possibly white supremacists over the, and they're all, they're driving balloons, ladies and gentlemen, we have to, we have to shoot them down with a $400,000 sidewinder missile or bleep blorp is going to, you know, he's going to expose you to COVID-20. And that's, that's, that's where we are now. Like this, this, this narrative machine, and you talk about simulations and I'm like, we're like, uh, event 201 plus dark winter plus spars divided by deagle.com right now. Like there's something just totally weird about it. And it's hard to find equilibrium.

It's hard to have to find your balance because you know, there's, we're, we're not heavily funded in alternative media. Like we're doing research, like there's great scholars and journalists out there and you're one of them. And we're just, we're just people. We're just regular people and trying to find out we don't have the massive amount of funds and resources that the mainstream does and then just doesn't use. I had a story I read on my show the other day. They accidentally covered the Ukraine conflict and they accidentally stumbled upon the fact that they're not going to be able to kick Russia out of Crimea. Like the guy reported it and then now he's on the kill list.

Right, right, right, right. He didn't mean to. I was just I was trying to investigate, you know. If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know, then I don't know what will. The guy that honestly, I don't know had a jerry mcguire moment right he he he woke up in the morning and decided he was going to tell the truth and came out there and said i just don't think they're going to take crimea back and they're like well what and and so were you promoted for this amazing journalism no you were put on a kill list for it because how dare you tell the truth about this this is we're we're not in a we didn't send you out here to tell the truth.

We sent you out here to be part of the propaganda. I mean, listen, nobody's going to believe that those air raid sirens are real unless you keep telling the public that we're in mortal danger when Joe Biden goes out there and walks around. Hey, where's your security? Air raid sirens and you've got the most important, the leader of the free world trademark out there about to get evaporated by an inbound cruise missile and the White House staff and the Secret Service just allow him to just continue wandering that's because it's all fake like all of this it's just a gigantic you're like you might as well be on the warner brothers set you know as far as i'm concerned uh believe me i you know haven't been a part of uh you know the invasion of a couple of countries not saying that i i'm like super proud of it or just part of it and you can realize like the propaganda is heavy like even at the time i remember seeing like stuff that was on the news compared to like what was on the ground. And I'm like, well, that really didn't happen that way. That was like an awakening to me. Like

that's not really how that went down. You know, then they would embed a reporter with you. And then the news out of that would be so much different than what you're actually seeing. So we see, we see that. I mean, and, mean and and you know it's interesting and i'll change gears a little bit because i want to get your opinion but it's kind of in the same vein it's like they're trying to accomplish something with the narrative they're trying to obviously there's a there's a direction that we that we're supposed to go you've written about it and the controlled demolition of the american empire obviously the america was set up to be to be looted um to uh have its assets uh you know uh tapered off and sold off and again it's kind of like a corporation that uh the mitt romney's gonna buy with bank capital they're gonna break it up you know and

make it great you know job creators charlie right so but what i was reading in that JFK speech, and then the author was talking about how the enemies of the deep state at the time, the FBI and the CIA and others, these were like ardent cold warrior, right-winger military industrial complex type, the type that Mr. X was referring to

in the movie JFK, like just warmongers and anti-communistsist you fast forward to our time there are no right wingers but it's the same dangerous deep state where where do you think just and then this is kind of off topic but still sort of you know in the same vein where where was the bend in the river like you realize i think you and i agree like the not the operation paperclip nazi scientist people and they made up you know according to jim mars that was like the the the rise of the fourth reich was inside the military industrial

complex after world war ii i agree with that um you know meant to be you know i probably set up by the bankers meant to like kind of control the monster they made in the Soviet Union. Where are we now? Like, if you don't find those, there's no like anti-communist, but they're still fascist. How does that even work? Yeah. It's funny, man. I remember when the left was anti-war, you know, and now they're, now they're, they're on MSNBC pushing it harder than it. And the Republican party is going like, or at least the republicans themselves are going do we really need to start this war i think every big major pivotal event that that that changed america in particular probably the world as well allowed them to you know put us on

this path jfk was one obviously. Everything sort of changed after that. Then you go a couple of decades and you have the fall of the Soviet Union. You go, well, that looked like a controlled demolition as well. Hollow it out from the inside with their currency, drag it into an unwinnable war in Afghanistan for 10 years. That'll show them, right? And break them up, the controlled demolition of the Russian empire, the Soviet system, right? And Jeff and I actually kind of make that comparison. It's not so much that Russia went away. It's that the Soviet Union went away, all those satellite nations. And we described it the way somebody that was stuck on a snowy mountain facing hypothermia, what your body does is it prioritizes the blood flow. You're going to lose your fingers and your toes, but it'll keep your heart and brain

alive because it'll keep you alive by prioritizing the blood flow. So those external things fall away. You're left with mother Russia. We have 9-11, right? 9-11, the Patriot Act, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and TSA and these agencies that are not for our protection at all. They're set there to create some form of police state, the removal of our rights. And then you have COVID and medical martial law takeover, again, with the removal of our rights for our safety, for your safety, as the just as the Nazis said, you know, and and you have this incremental move towards fascism. And if you can do it over a long enough time timeline, it seems like a natural, almost like a natural progression, but it's anything but a natural progression. It's been made to happen. And so when we get to this place now, when we're looking back on the breakup of the Soviet Union and you go, well,

here's the American empire. What did we get dragged into? Afghanistan, again, not 10 years, 20 years. And now we're talking about doing, now we're in another unwinnable war. Not officially, of course, but financially and militarily, we're supporting another boondoggle while we need that money back here at home. So you feel like it's just a slow move towards destroying and hollowing out this America, this empire. And I would suggest that this has been in the works for a very long time. And I agree with Jim Mars, talking about the fourth Reich, like fourth Reich, fourth industrial revolution, what's the difference, right? It's the same ideology of like, we're in charge. We've got the technology. And it always makes me think of Daniel Inouye when he's talking about this secret government

that has its own funding mechanisms and its own air force and its own military. And you go, who? And then you have Bill Clinton on a, I would assume, a moment of clarity, not one that he normally says, there's a secret government and I don't control it. And you go, okay, let's talk about that because apparently the parasite has taken control of the host. And we're in a situation now where this parasite secret government has taken control of the host and it's going to kill it. And in the process, potentially kill itself. So it's a genocidal mentality that I can maybe understand from a clinical standpoint, but I can't internally understand this.

I just can't, I just don't think like these people and you don't either. And so we're at a severe disadvantage when we drag our biases, which is we're normal, nice, good people that want the best for everyone. And we're trying to analyze a situation that's run by total psychopaths that aren't hung up on things like that. They're free to cross lines that you and I would never dream of crossing.

They're not saddled with this sort of conscience or something like that. And so I'm worried. I'm worried about that because I don't feel, I feel like we have limitations on how much we're willing to defend ourselves. And I feel like these people, there are no limits to what they'll do. And if they want to unleash a virus on the population and blame it on something else, they'll do it. And if, and, and, and COVID I think was a, was a test run. You know, I think if anything, they, they learned quite a bit from that. They learned about how we'll respond, how, where our pressure points are, where we, where we stand up, you know, if anything, it was a dress rehearsal for what's coming next. And so I'm, I'm, I'm concerned about them for sure, but I'm also fairly concerned about us, our response, and how passive the American public have become to a lot of these things where we've sort of allowed ourselves to be subjugated.

And that's very concerning to me because I always was taught when I was growing up that America sort of stands for something. And I don't feel like a lot of the population stands for much anymore. In fact, they're so busy. They're sitting down, linking arms, blocking roads because they're worried about cow farts destroying the climate and killing everybody. So they have to block the 405 freeway.

You know what I mean? So I'd like to be more optimistic. I just, I just don't feel it right now. I don't feel this optimism. Maybe something will turn. Well, I hope so. Uh, but we have all these invisible enemies, Charlie, you know, you have to, yeah, that's true. Can't see the hijackers, but you find their passport and the rubble. Uh, you can't see that. Then you have another, you have viruses that are invisible. You can't see that. Then you have another, you have viruses that are invisible. You can't see it. Trump called it the invisible enemy.

Then you have climate change, which used to, when I was a kid, you were a kid, it was about cleaning up trash and planting trees. Now we don't do that anymore because that would mean that we'd have to like look at the Southwest and realize that we're having a, we're having an on-purpose invasion of people that, again, our elites are inviting and sending them debit cards and instruction manuals. And Joe Biden and whatever administration, under the Trump administration, our military was used as Sherpas to make sure that they were escorted to the proper facility to be processed and never seen again into the American interior. So we have all that because we'd have to clean that up. We'd have to clean up that trash. It's an ecological disaster in the Southwest.

Greenpeace won't talk about it because it's not good. It has nothing to do with climate change, which is an abstract, invisible thing. You can only get Greta Thunberg. You can't talk about, you know, taking the the the island made of plastic and trash from the third world in the ocean. You can't talk about getting... See, I'm all about clean air and water and all that stuff, but we don't talk about that. We just talk about shutting you down, putting you back into the stone age, making sure that you have an electric car so you can't go anywhere because if there's no grid to support your car and they didn't build the grid, then you're not gonna be able to charge it

and your your combustion engine is gone so that's i think that's the whole point that's why you put somebody like a road scholar uh like buttigieg or whatever you put him in charge of transportation because you're not going to go anywhere under this like marxian road scholar uh figure and that's what they they pick these people and also to make you feel helpless, like he's going to wear his little vest and walk up and you just make America looks pathetic, but it's really not. It's just that nobody is allowed to get to anywhere

that makes any difference. If you have any integrity or you're, you know, a real person, because this is a script and everything is like the, you know, we're about to be in inundated charlie um and your show and my show and everybody's show that's that's that's objective is going to suffer because the cult is going to come back and all this 2024 rhetoric and who do you support you like desantis with his bds laws uh with israel and and his shutdown of bloggers?

Or do you like Trump, who already was president and locked you down because it's not essential and printed 40% of all the dollars ever made? Which one gave you the shot? So which one do you like better? And why aren't you on my team? And this is going to continue. And I think less and less people get captured by the fulcrum of the PSYOP, but it's not enough yet to make a real significant change. So it's like when I listened to your show and you talk about, um, you know, just being prepared, it's like, yeah, you know, having, having a plan, having a bug out bag, having, um, you know, having the ability to garden, start thinking about, uh, uh, you know, trading economically with people of like minds one of the reasons i set up wolfpack uh dot gold and that's what i sponsor uh and your show i sponsor david's

show and that's we're building a network and it's a work in progress but it's a network there like it's it's my response to the central bank digital currency uh it's my response to that totalitarian move like physical things trade and we'll even talk about crypto in there too. But there's so much that we need to do because it looks like, you know, you talk about the train wreck, like America is a train, like we train wreck and we have the right now. Perfect symbology. It's the perfect symbology. And like, you know, the Palestinians and that is like, the Palestinians get shafted again. That's kind of like the way it's been in foreign policy, too. So I just I think it's more important than ever shows like yours.

The deep analysis, having people, I mean, knowledge, you know, can be turned into wisdom and you can share that with others. Like just having that research. Charlie's doing so much. I mean, he's doing God's work. He's you guys need to go subscribe to his channel, macroaggressions, anywhere a podcaster found the guest list. I know I'm on it. I'm biased, but the guest list, magnificent you're waiting for the herd to tell you when to do this or that, or tell it, you know, you're waiting for Rachel Maddow to tell you when to be afraid. It's too late. You know, you trust your instincts, trust what you see. You see what you see, you know what you see. It's not good. You've got money in the banks. You have questions about the banks. You're right to have questions about the banks, convert some of your soon to be worthless federal reserve notes into tangible assets. Maybe that's gold and silver through Tony. Maybe that's productive farmland. Maybe that's owning land with water and water rights, whatever. Just start

thinking about these things and make a move now and trust your instincts because I think our analysis is correct. I think we see where things are going. I try to bring on interesting people that can help to point us in the right direction. I just interviewed a guy who's a homesteader yesterday. He lost his corporate job because he refused to tell his employees to take the vaccine. He was fired on the spot. And he said, I'm out of here. He had a piece of land. He built out a full farm and house and workshop. And he told me exactly how to do it, what it costs, what the process was. I love that stuff. So if people are interested in that, Macroaggressions goes out as an audio podcast twice a week, once as an interview, once as a monologue. And you can find it in video format on

rockfin odyssey band up video vigilante.tv and you can follow me on twitter at macroaggression where i most definitely argue with robots from time to time but i have a good time doing it it's all right and i appreciate you tony thank you for having me back on it's always my pleasure to connect with uh you know a real thoughtful audience that, you know, probably sees the same things I'm seeing out there. Sometimes I forget we're even on air and we're just talking night. I know because we have these conversations. David Night Show.

When we're not recording, we have these same conversations. When I get a text from you or phone calls from you, we have the same conversation. So we're not, we're not hamming it up for the camera. I assure you, this is basically like a like this is just like a, you know, a Thursday for you and me. Right. Thank you so much, Charlie. I appreciate you being here. It was a great segment. Thank you so much. Go find Charlie, folks. See you soon, my friend. All right, folks, I think we've got a minute 20 left in the broadcast. Well, always an honor to be here. Uh just being able to fill in for for David and uh give him a ability to take a day off and still keep alive the live feed going. I found as a broadcaster, it's always helpful to have a live feed over a rebroadcast anytime. So I'm happy to do that. Uh and uh David will be back on Thursday. Uh guard Goldsmith tomorrow. tomorrow here I'll be producing. So you guys get ready. So you talk about a great show. You've got one in store. I'm sure

Guard is working around the clock. He's probably not even sleeping. He's probably just getting articles and links and research. Stuff that I can't do. He's going to be putting that together. So I really look forward to that. Let's put up real quick the price of gold. 1,819 Luciferian bankster notes per troy

ounce on uh the yellow metal and silver 20 24 cents for the white metal uh that is cheap you go to david knight dot gold uh to learn more i'm going to put on the outro theme see if we can find it here we go. Alright. I think I missed it by about 10 seconds. We sure appreciate each and every one of you. Go to thedavidknightshow.com Make sure

you support this organization, this show, and the Knight family. From Beans the Brave and myself, you guys take care of each other end of transmission The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.

Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.