The David Knight Show - 7Nov23 Manifesto Shows the REAL NASHVILLE KILLER Govt & Media Don't Want You to See

Episode Date: November 7, 2023

They didn't want you to see the manifesto because it shows who/what trained the killer. FBI & Mockingbird press' agenda is to simply take away your self-defense. The five tactics of the government establishment's red herring approach. Are schools a bigger threat to children and more dangerous than guns?(2:56)VOX weeps about another Democrat tyrant wannabe who will actually be a big win in the Supreme Court for the right to keep and bear arms (40:28)Actor Peter Sellers Explained US-Afghanistan War 60 Years Ago We've paid Afghanistan $11 BILLION since the US was thrown out of the country. But it's worse even that "The Mouse That Roared". And even comedian Peter Sellers couldn't come up with something as absurd as the US War OF Drugs against the world (1:23:17)FDA does some more food recalls — metal in chicken nuggets, lead in kids' drinks. How about the graphene in the GCI jabs? No problem says FDA (1:31:04)Trump grandstands in the courtroom. This is what will pass for debates this time around — debates about HIM. But even as he condemns Biden for "banana republic" political persecution, Trump says he will do the same. Do we want a 3rd world dictatorship? A civil war? (1:36:21)Mark Meadows sued by his book publisher for saying one thing in a courtroom under oath, and something completely different in the book he hoped to sell to the MAGA cult. (1:51:01)INTERVIEW Street Economist: How to Economics So That Even a Socialist Can Understand Will the Peronista cult of Evita Peron continue to drag Argentina to socialist hell of hyperinflation and taxes? Will Taylor Swift fans' self-owned, "Swifties Against Freedom Advances" hurt libertarian economist Javier Milei's chances in 10 days of turning the country around? How would YOU answer a socialist who says nonsense like Obama, that free markets are a tool of slavery and colonization? Axel Kaiser, author of "Street Economist, Fifteen Economic Lessons Every Citizen Should Know" joins to give you intellectual ammunition to defend liberty (2:00:00) Issues with bank deposits STILL NOT going through the only private clearing house — persist. What's is going on with the big banks? Catherine Austin Fitts on the importance of having a good relationship with a bank that knows you and concerns about Bitcoin being a set-up, a Trojan horse by the NSA (2:46:56)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Music Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 7th of November, year of our Lord, 2023. Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at gun issues at the manifesto that was released. It's very interesting because you see the same five or six things that are done all the time, all the time by the left. And we'll talk about how this is a pattern that we see in terms of their reaction, their cover-up, their misdirection as to what is happening with this. But there is also an interesting case that is going to the Supreme Court that has Vox, a leftist publication, all tied up and concerns about what's going to happen because it's going to be a big win.

A big win for free speech, a big win for the Constitution, and the leftist authoritarians hate that. So we're going to begin with a manifesto. We'll also take a look at what happened with Trump. There's some updates as to what happened in Israel. And as Joe McGuffin sent to me, there's some interesting information about U.S. military activity in the area. We'll be right back. Well, by now you've probably seen or heard the pages that were leaked. There was three pages that were leaked as photographs of the manifesto that has been hidden.

Hidden by the Nashville Police Department. They said, well, we're going to release it. But then the FBI got involved and we don't want you to release that. And so they fought tooth and nail with it. And you have, for the only thing that doesn't make any sense to me about all of this is why the school itself would want to keep this hidden. There may be some other information about the school that is derogatory, that has not surfaced, but what we see is a pattern of hatred that if this had been released,

it would have blown their gun control narrative out of the water. Folks, we don't need gun control. We need education control. Our educational institutions are out of control and they have weaponized a program of racial hatred, of violence, and as you see with this person, of self-hatred.

All the transgender stuff is really about taking the self-loathing liberal mentality and taking it to an all-new level. Hating what gender you are, not just the fact that you're white or your skin color or whatever. These self-loathing liberals, they must hate everything about themselves. And so this is essentially, it's like an essay from one of their classes, K through 12 plus college. This is the kind of person that the educational institutions are producing and seek to produce this is by design they want this they want lunatics who hate themselves who don't who hate their body who hate their gender they hate everything about themselves and hate everybody

else and they want to turn them loose in society in the same way they want to bring in terrorists from the middle east or saboteurs from china in addition to economic refugees to go on the welfare state they want to destroy this country they have many different ways to do it this is just another one of them so what we've seen with a manifesto handwritten dated february the 23rd 2023 kill those kids those crackers going to fancy private schools with those fancy khakis and sports backpacks oh wow and with their daddy's mustangs and convertibles i don't know if that is a mustang convertible or is that two different classes of things? She would not like me. I've been known to wear khakis. I don't carry backpacks, but and I, my first car was a Mustang and I like convertibles.

Anyway, this is the kind of stuff, right? And then filled with profanities. I won't bother to go into. Kill all these little crackers with all your white privileges. F-U, F-U, F-U. Filled with hate and absolutely deranged. And you see, this is why red flag gun laws don't matter. You take a gun away from somebody that's this filled with hate from the time they spend in the educational institutions. Uh, they'll find some way to kill you if they're

filled with that kind of hate. And we've seen that over and over again, Waukesha, Wisconsin. You know, we don't want to talk about that. Do we, we don't want to talk about the racial motives. We don't want to talk about the fact that murder weapon was not a gun. It was an SUV. Targeted children, targeted grannies in a Christmas parade. In May, the Star News, which is the parent company of the Tennessee Star, a conservative paper here in Tennessee, filed a lawsuit against the Metro Nashville Police Department and another one against the FBI to try to get them to release the documents. And those lawsuits remain active. But now this has been leaked. This person, Hale, killed three students, three staff members. And again, when you talk about killing nine-year-olds,

point blank, the level of hatred and insanity of this person. But that is what is being pushed everywhere. This was, I said yesterday, you know, going through this fetishized ritual that the Washington post did with taking down the statue of Robert Lee. That's not just about white people.

That's not just about the Confederacy. It's not, this is about destroying America this is their agenda to breed hate and to get you to respond in kind by the way it's one of the reasons why I talked about that yesterday the fact that we as Christians need to understand that the uh foundation of our country was based on Christian ethics. And let's not lose the Christian ethic that we transcend this tit-for-tat violence, that we don't escalate that, that we de-escalate that, that we rise above it.

I know that's not easy to do. Christ does not call us to easy things. I know that everything in your human nature wants to go against that. You see the slaughter of children videos and you know, I don't want to, I don't need to know anything else about it. Let's nuke Gaza. Okay. Well, that's not going to work out for a variety of reasons. And a lot of people say, well, you know, Gaza is so close. It could destroy your country as well. Oh, okay. Well, let's just bomb them back into the Stone Age or something like that. You have to pull back from this hatred.

And it is escalating and even spilling over worldwide, this hatred that we see in the Middle East. But this is a program of hatred that has been festering for a long time, injected into our kids when we abandoned them to the state to be raised. That's what taking your kid to a government school is, abandoning them to the state to be raised. And let me tell you, a lot of the private schools, they teach the same thing as the government schools do. Why? Because the government is controlling the tests. You control the tests, you control the accreditation, then you control the curriculum, and you can do that with the private schools, especially if there is money that follows the students into that, into charter schools. The whole thing about schools has been taken over. Our country has had the Marxist authoritarians who have marched

through the institutions and they are as thoroughly in control of all the schools as they as the leftist mentality controls social media apple google all the mainstream media companies. And so, um, uh, she called herself a transgender man, former student at this elementary school, the leaked manifesto refers to the shooting as quote death day said, can't believe I'm doing this, but I'm ready. I hope my victims aren't.

The manifesto also indicates that the shooting was racially motivated. Want to kill all you little crackers, kill those kids. Yeah yeah and that's one thing i've never figured that out um what the cracker thing is all about not that i care i've been called cracker or whatever i i don't really care you know haters gonna hate. What does it even mean? Anyway, I guess today it would be crockers. They'd be wearing crocs or something. I don't know any more than I understand the hatred of khaki pants, backpacks, Mustangs, and convertibles.

Their haters are going to hate. So the key thing is she doesn't hate those things. The key thing is she hates herself. Everything about herself. Many of the victim's family members are seeking to block the public release of the manifesto, but Republican Tennessee Senator Bill Hagerty called for his release, saying, I think people deserve to know what took place, what was in the mind of this sick person that committed these heinous murders. Well, we know what was in the mind, and we kind of knew this already.

But the question, Senator Hagerty, is who and what and how is this hatred being put in so many people's minds? And we look at this now. I mean, you know, the hatred that came out immediately after pictures of the massacre um people said it was justified how do you can't ever justify something like that and you can't justify what is being done by the state of israel and gaza now either i mean what is the matter with people on both sides of this but um anyway um we now know the mass murder was not just nuts but viscerally hated students at this school and i hope i have a high death count ready to die ha ha kill those kids going to private fancy schools um she um planned to make a videotape at 11.20, according to the diary, leave for school at 11.35, then attack at 12.30.

But she attacked at 10.11 after sending an Instagram message to a friend who called 911. And she was dead by 10.27. Shot by cops after she murdered three nine-year-olds and three adults. Again, that's so sad to see this and nobody wants to talk about why. Nobody wants to talk about SSRIs. Nobody wants to talk about the institutions that inculcate

this kind of hatred in people. No, no, take away the gun. And we know what their motive is on that. On X, conservatives blame the anti-white, anti-Christian hate with which Hale was inoculated, much of which is found in the

D-E-I-C-R-T propaganda. Well, it's propaganda. It's their curriculum. This is what happens when racial division is sown into every aspect of public school curriculum, says Sarah Fields of the Texas Freedom Coalition. So what are we going to do about it? Nothing. You know, they'll wring their

hands and they'll continue to fund the schools. We'll continue to educate kids the same way. And I think that we're going to somehow get a different result. And you know, if you just vote for those Republicans, they'll fix all of that stuff. No, they won't. They won't. They won't. They won't get rid of the Department of Education. They won't stop bribing people to push hate to the institutions. When you vote for these Republicans in Congress, you vote for your Republican president,

they're not going to do anything about this. And they probably won't do anything about it at the state level. We have to have a grassroots movement to defund these schools and to rethink the way that we're educating our children and to reactivate the family instead of constantly turning to the state to fix all of our problems.

To the state to educate our kids. It's exactly what I would expect. A bunch of anti-white hate, vitriol, fanatic, psychotic ramblings, all about wanting to kill those kids. Is that another patriot voice? When those kids is mentioned, that means white kids, despite the fact that the lunatic was

white. Well, of course it's not despite that, but it's because of that. It is the program of self-hatred, self-loathing. This is just, and this has been going on all of my life with the left. And so this is, you know, when we look at this, thank you. When we look at this, it is just on steroids, but it's the same thing in principle that I've been seeing all of my life. The truth is, tragically, this killer was fully indoctrinated in every poisonous, woke ideology

parroted over the past 15 years by the Obama administration, the Biden administration, the Clinton DNC, Hollywood, corporate America, universities, schools, and mainstream media. What's missing from that? That's Tom Moore, commentator tom what did tom forget trump trump trump was pushing this transgender insanity at the same time that he was praising hillary clinton do you understand who that guy is boy if there's ever been a manchurian candidate for conservatives it's donald trump he has pushed all of this stuff and nobody ever holds him responsible. Why?

Because as the wall street journal said, when they were talking about dissent, it's why are the Republicans and there's public and politicians in Florida. Why are they endorsing president Trump instead of DeSantis? And one of them said, well, because if you go against Trump, that's suicide. They're afraid of him. They're afraid of Benedict Donald. This New York gun control, Hillary loving, transgender pushing liberal.

Adulterer. Failure at casinos. Do I need to go on? This guy who has failed at everything except at pushing the world economic forum agenda on us he's failed at everything else if in fact that's what he wanted to do because all whites are racist they share collective guilt for the sins of the past real and imagined so that guilt can only be expiated by abolition of whiteness. Yeah, that's the writings of these people,

white fragility. We believe that so long as the white race exists, all movements against what is called racism will fail. Therefore, our aim is to abolish the white race. Well, yeah, it's right there. White fragility, it is a policy of genocide, and Hale was just doing what she was taught. Now, the Nashville mayor's office came out, and they confirmed the authenticity of this. We had some interesting statements from the police department that seemed to muddy the water for some people, but I think it was just the language that people didn't really understand.

The Nashville Police Department said the photographs are not MNPD, the Metro Nashville Police Department, not MNPD crime scene images. I think all they were saying was that they didn't get this from us. This wasn't the stuff that we had in our custody. Must have gotten from somebody else. And of course, the FBI has these pictures as well. The Behavioral Analysis Unit obtained the manifesto and then kept it. And so the police department there in Nashville is simply saying they didn't steal it from us.

Well, we'll find out. But that's really what they are focused on, isn't it? Not the content, but the provenance of this. How did they get this? And so it's now being labeled as sensitive content, censored on X, censored on Reddit. Of course, it's being censored on Reddit. Reddit was always the first and the worst in censorship. I remember before any of this stuff started on social media, Reddit was infamous for censorship. Facebook as well, doing the same thing, hiding this everywhere.

They don't want you to see it. Too late, it's out. And we knew this anyway, didn't we? Metro Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell has said he has directed the city's legal director to initiate an investigation to leak, but he wouldn't address the veracity of the documents. Well, I think actually he just did. He won't say if he's going to. How did this thing leak out? Well, I'm not saying that's the real thing, but we're going to find out who leaked it.

You know, that type of deal. Multiple sources said, um, the guy who of all things is an investigative reporter for a, uh, TV station. It is a news channel five. It's a CBS affiliate. It is owned by scripts, which owns about 120 TV stations still. Many newspapers and things like that. It's a big Wall Street corporation that owns all these. And it's a CBS affiliate.

And so, of course, this is the way they react. Phil. Phil. Phil? Yeah. Hey, Phil? Phil? Phil Connors? Phil Connors i thought that no it's not phil connors it's phil williams phil williams phil phil is that you you sound just like all the mainstream media always does it's like groundhog day again isn't it always is with these guys

and so here's what phil phil phil phil says multiple stores sources have told me that the selective leak of three pages of the covenant school shooting manifesto is extremely misleading people who have read the whole thing say there's something in there for everybody another said she hated everybody so this is an investigative reporter and now he's doing the investigation that he wasn't interested in doing for when was this mac and may i think six months six months he doesn't care but then when somebody shows what's really in the mind of these people who are being uh weaponized by our school systems. Now he cares. Hates everybody.

Well, again, this is what we've heard from these people over and over again. The spin from mainstream media. Rents repeat. Rents repeat. It's always the same stuff from these people. It is always Groundhog Day. No, no, no. Don't believe that stuff. Even though they said they hate white people. Don't believe that's not what this is about really the trans terrorist words are in black and white yet mainstream media hacks like phil phil are trying to gaslight you into thinking that they're being misconstrued, says Zero Hedge.

Yeah, so now we know why the cover-up. Because this killer sounds exactly like the stereotypical college professor, the stereotypical college student today. Parroting, regurgitating, vomiting this hatred that has been stuffed into them on a daily basis by people in authority you know the milgram experiment and the people around them their peers you know the ash experiment facebook immediately censored it as i said march 27th, just days before the Trans Day of Vengeance, which was April 1st, April Fool's Day. The manifesto, which one official described as astronomically dangerous, dangerous to them, because it shows that the real violence is not the gun,

it's the school. We have all this stuff about school shooting, but it's the school, it's the curriculum that is violent. We never had any of this stuff before. Even RFK Jr., that I grew up in school in the Northeast. He wasn't even in the South like me. And he said people used to bring their guns to school for target practice and things like that. I know.

We're the same age. Used to see people riding around with rifles in the back of their pickup truck window, gun racks and things like that. It's the people that have changed. The guns have not changed. And it's this curriculum that is changing them. It's the schools that is a key instrument in terms of changing this. So when we talk about school shootings, the emphasis should be on the school, not on the gun, because that's where the killing is taking place, in the mind.

Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks, the killer writes, and the killer writes and the killer takes action with whatever tool they have. The problem is not the tool. The problem is the hate that's being inculcated everywhere. So they were going to release it. Then the Nashville police department said, no, we can't do it. After the stonewalling began, there was a lawsuit filed by the National Police Association that joined the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and in Davidson County. They all sued to see this manifesto. The National

Police Association did. So where is this stonewalling and this hiding coming from? It's coming from the FBI. It's coming from the federal government. Because that's where this curriculum of hate is coming from as well, and being weaponized. The FBI also denied a request for the manifesto, saying that this is going to interfere with enforcement proceedings. What? You're not going to have a trial. The shooter's dead. There's not going to be any enforcement proceedings. Putting this stuff out there is not going to prejudice the public and contaminate a jury. The perp is dead.

There's not going to be any trial. There's not going to be any jury. There's not going to be any enforcement proceedings. So as usual, the FBI is telling an fib the federal investigation bureau is lying they're fibbing as usual jagger hoover is fib as usual and then you have the people who are still doubling down on the hate openly talking about it here's a uh uso serious you so serious i guess that's what he's trying to say again anonymous pseudonym because this guy's a coward uh i hope it was republicans that lost their lives one good thing about gun violence is that it occasionally wipes out full republican

families in one fell swoop there you go hatred Same kind of hatred we see with the Israel and Palestine thing that's going on. The Tennessee Three, remember they did an insurrection in the Tennessee Capitol, and unlike the so-called insurrection on January the 6th, they actually got in contact with the legislators, pushed and shoved them, and you unlike in washington dc instead of having an army of armored cops with shields and everything else to provoke people the way the tennessee state police did this was they used their bodies unarmored no helmets they used their bodies to shield the legislators as the mob penetrated into the Capitol building, started pushing and shoving and hitting the state troopers as well as the legislators who were there. But that wasn't an insurrection. As a matter of fact, one of the three leaders of it, the Tennessee Three, Justin Pearson, here's a picture of him invited to the White House because Biden likes that kind of insurrection.

You know, one man's insurrectionist is another man's hero. And so these insurrectionists in Tennessee were heroes to Biden, even though they got much further, did more than anybody did January the 6th. He was invited to see Biden. And so what have they had to say about this nothing nothing at all complete silence these tennessee three who were there let a big mob of people say we gotta stop all guns in tennessee well good luck with that good luck with that and that snowballed chance uh not well not in tennessee but in hell that you're going to get that to happen. Uh, but, um, they had, remember the three of them, well, two of them were expelled.

The, uh, two Justins and then just in time, they were installed back in by their respective jurisdiction. their respective jurisdictions. Uh, and, uh, so again, the, uh, these people who, uh, came after all this stuff and said, we've got to ban the gun. They're trying to ban the wrong thing. What should they ban? You know, whenever something horrible happens and we always have to look to government to fix everything. And so what is the government's response?

Well, we've got to ban something, right? And we've got to use force against somebody. So what should we ban? Well, obviously I don't think the gun maybe what we should ban is what the hate that's at the center of this remember uh nuki haley got herself projected onto the national stage because after dylan roof went in and shot uh i forget to count the the number of people. It was a small group, a small prayer group. Everybody was black but him. And he goes into this prayer group, and after they do their prayers, he shoots and kills them.

Just amazing how heinous that was. Well, they dug around. They found a picture of Dylann Roof with a Confederate flag in the background. And so Nuki Haley decides she would ban the Confederate flag. And so I think if we can find that this is the motivation of this manifesto killer, maybe we should ban the LGBT pride flag. Let's ban that flag. Oh, but you say that doesn't represent all the LGBT people. Well, you said the Confederate flag represented the hate of Dylann Roof. So doesn't the LGBT flag represent the hate of the LGBT people. Well, you said the Confederate flag represented the hate of Dylann Roof. So doesn't the LGBT flag represent the hate of the LGBT people?

Yeah, of course, we know how this is going to work. That is not going to happen. But again, they were appointed back in with a special selection, reappointed after they're kicked out. The anti-whiteness movement has been mainstreamed by American universities and corporations, and it has blood on its hands, says J.D. Vance. Well, he's right, except that he forgets K-12. It starts way before universities.

And it's after the universities that they go into the corporations. Again, J.D. Vance needs to understand this is a K-12. That should not be sacrosanct. We're in a fourth turning, and if we don't get rid of these institutions that have failed, it's going to get much worse. There's a lot of institutions that are going to go, and we need to throw out the ones that are evil. And I'm saying that the institutionalized schools are antithetical to education.

Antithetical to education. They're not the same thing. Call it the federal department of schools. It's not the department of education. They're not educating anybody. As Charlotte Disaby said, they're deliberately dumbing people down. So the Nashville mayor, Freddie O'Connell, has ordered an investigation just like Hillary Clinton. Remember, when Hillary Clinton's emails of 30 some odd thousand, she put them on.

These are many of them classified. Many of them were above top secret because they were born classified that way. There were things, communications between her and other heads of state, heads of departments. Those things are, they don't need to go through a classification thing. They're born as classified information. So she puts all this stuff. She creates a website called ClintonEmails.com or HillaryClintonEmails.com, but it's right there, right there. Puts up a storefront on the internet for it.

Come and get the emails. And then when somebody does and they see this, even though Hillary Clinton had violated all of the national security laws and all the national security rules as Secretary of State, what did she do? Well, she said, who did this? Who put this stuff up? Well, you put it up on the internet.

No, who talked about me doing this crime? Who was it that did this? And again, you know, it's just like the red herring. She just drug this smelly fish over the trail to throw the hounds off. And that's exactly what this Nashville mayor is doing. It's what these people always do. Who did this? Forget the crime.

Who did it? Who did it? Same, same tactic over and over again. So the Tennessee Star authenticated the documents. A radio host authenticated them. And so did News Channel 5. Phil? Yeah, that guy. He authenticated them as well. But then he tries to spin it. Says, well, I know this isn't illustrative of the full

manifesto. So you knew all this stuff about the manifesto or you didn't care to know as an investigative reporter, Phil, Phil. So did they help to conceal it or did are they just making this stuff up now or are they finally interested in it? No, none of those things are happening, actually. And so. As J.D. Vance said, you know, this is the anti-whiteness movement. It's got blood on its hands. This is what it produces.

He said, in the meantime, say a prayer for every kid who lost their life and every parent who lost a child. You see, the deal is that ideas have consequences. But the left says it's not the ideas. The left says it's not the hate that we're inculcating in people. It's the gun. It's the gun. No, it is the hate.

So I'll sum this up before we go to break here. We've got five points. Because we see this kind of thing happening every single time. This is the M.O. of the left. First of all, you have the government and the media, after they cover everything up and then after it gets released, they are furious. They're furious that their cover-up has failed. And like Hillary, they want you to forget about the crime. They want you to forget about the hate.

And they want to get you to forget about the hate and they want to forget what gets you to forget about the motivation of this person and they want you to focus on who released this and we're going to see a lot of stuff who released this my tooth comb it'll be all about that we don't want to talk about what's in there i'm just going to tell you phil knows and phil says there's nothing you know this is not typical at all so just disregard what you saw with your own eyes we got to figure out who put this stuff out there just like hillary also uh all of this content again is regurgitation of our educational system the stuff that is hammered into these kids from kindergarten on up self-loathing hatred hating themselves driving these people nuts getting them to hate everybody and everything so you got to defund

these schools uh also um you know the where phil comes in it's the same type of thing we've been talking about with the pharmaceutical companies and the mainstream media. As people expose what has happened with these things, whether it's studies or whether it's documents that they find of Pfizer, confessions, the Pfizer manifestos, if you will. And we've had a lot of those releases. We've had so much evidence of deaths, of cover-up, of conspiracies, of crimes. And how do they react?

Exactly the same. They say, well, that's just misinformation. That's not real. That's not an accurate picture. Well, give us an accurate picture. Show us the manifesto, Phil. Let's get the full manifesto. And if you say that when people criticize Pfizer's poisons, you say, well, that's not an accurate picture of all that stuff.

Well, give me the data then. You are holding the data. You're withholding the data. You're hiding the data about what Pfizer did before the release, what they learned afterwards, what the FDA knows instead of the FBI. It's the FDA with them. And so you have these federal agencies that are complicit in the cover-up. You have these federal agencies and the people who are involved in it hiding the information.

And then saying, well, it's all misinformation. Whatever these people have discovered, oh, don't pay attention to that. Well, you can make all this go away. You say it's misinformation, prove it. Release your data. But they don't pay attention to that. Well, you can make all this go away. You say it's misinformation. Prove it. Release your data. But they won't release the data. And I don't think you're going to see this released.

Just like I don't think you're going to see the pharmaceutical stuff released. Who knows? I hope I'm wrong. But this is an MO of these people. This is how they operate. You're a liar. And I've got the data here that proves that you're a liar, but you can't see that data. I'm going to hide that data from you.

I'm going to hide it at all costs from you. Seen this thing running this way with Michael Mann and his hockey stick, hockey puck garbage about climate change and all the rest of this stuff. These people make up stuff. You're a liar. I'm a scientist. I'm the authority. I'm the law enforcement, and you can't see my data.

And then finally, the fact that these Tennessee Three insurrectionists celebrated by Biden, and they don't care about the kids. They don't care about the hate. They don't care about the hate. They don't care about the problem. They've got a different agenda, and so they're going to use the death of these kids to try to take away guns that we can use to defend ourselves against them.

Them. The Antifa communist terrorists who took over the Tennessee state capitol. These violent people. They want to make sure that you don't have guns for self-defense. And Biden wants to make sure that you don't have guns for self-defense against him and his goons, his IRS army, his FBI army, all of these people out there. It's always the way these people operate. Those five things.

We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.

And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidKnightShow.com If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, they say the harder rock and roll is to beat. You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. Let me get some of your comments here about this. And we began the program with a tip.

Thank you very much, Chase Broden. Thank you very much. He says, thank you for everything you've done, David. To find a man willing to stand by his principles in these days is not easy. Almost non-existent. I haven't missed a day of your show for roughly three years. He said, I honestly hate the thought of knowing that someday this will all be in the past, I won't be able to tune in to hear what a good person says

about this. Well, thank you. I got to say, I just looked at the article that was put out by Drudge Mainstream Media. You know, eight ways that you can keep from aging. Aging is a disease and you need to do these eight things. I looked at him and I thought, okay, well, I got one of those covered.

I don't smoke. I don't get sleep. I don't get exercise. Not in this job. And a lot of other things. I think the low cholesterol ship has sailed a long time ago. The rest of this stuff. But thank you.

Appreciate that. Doug, thank you for the tip. Grant 777 and the press secretary would not say one thing about the shooting except trans are under attack right after it yeah that's right portray them as victim but i tell you the way they spend this and lie turn everything upside down inside out spend it around 180 degrees they're still doing that hell 9 000 watson funny how some manifestos are immediately released. Yeah, isn't it?

Isn't it? Jim Z7 says, he or she fancied herself a person of color. No, self-loathing liberal. I hate the white skin I'm in. I hate the gender that I'm in. She had to do the deed before the crank wore off. Couldn't wait for her own schedule yeah yeah again failed even at that uh the daily mock news says that girl shooter went to school

first to shoot it up but it was security guard so she went to the school that was wide open with no guards a good point and i should make that you know that's the one thing and um when you um talk about this in this next story by the way um vox is very upset about um the fact and this is the headline i saw this was like oh i've got to read this a boneheaded state official may have just handed the nra a big supreme court victory well it's not the nra but it's the second amendment but they just hand a big victory to and uh and that in this case they talk about the uh parkman uh shooting marjorie's uh douglas stone what i forget the name of the school but it's in in here wait a minute but the point being is that as you point out there was another school the shooter was going to go to, and they had school security.

But they had school security at this school. They had a guy in uniform with a gun. What did he do? Well, he hid. He hid. And I've used that as an example many times. I've said, look, we call people heroes when they risk their lives to save other people. Right?

So he was not a hero. He did what most people would be drawn to do. You have to go against your self-preservation. You know, as John Wayne said, courage is not being unafraid. Courage is being afraid and saddling up anyway. Right? Well, he was afraid, and he didn't saddle up. And I said, if you had had not just school security that failed,

school security said, well, I said, I'm, as we saw with Daryl Gates, so you go back to the Rodney King riots, okay? Daryl Gates had already been famous at that point in time for creating SWAT teams and militarizing the police and all this other kind of stuff. They had armored vehicles. And what did they do during the LA riots? They circled the wagons and protected themselves, just like this guy at the school shooting in Florida.

And so what's the solution to this? The solution is that people do not depend on other people to defend them, that you take responsibility for this yourself, that you have a weapon. So that if somebody comes in, an armed teacher could have protected those kids because an armed teacher would have been protecting themselves, quite frankly.

You don't have to be a hero to try to protect yourself. But when there are kids around that you know that are there, it may push you to be a little bit heroic, or maybe even a lot heroic. But for the guy who is outside the building, for the guy in uniform who doesn't know these kids, you know, and when he looks at him, he's just looking at them. Typically, you know, are they doing something wrong? Is there something I can write them up for something I can correct them about?

He doesn't really have. Now, that's his relationship with him. If he's got any relationship with him at all. It's that of a hall monitor. And so he's not going to protect them and that's why you need to have uh the ability that's why teachers need to be allowed to protect themselves and because um the other thing about it is that the shooter is not going to know which teachers are armed because they're not wearing something to identify themselves as

somebody carrying a gun all of it is superior to having to any other alternative that is out there and uh but the key thing is the schools the schools are the danger the schools are the danger more than the gun because the schools are weaponizing the mind the schools or destroying the soul of these kids turning it to hate and to murder it's the schools that did that with their curriculum that they've got there um it doesn't work with everybody you know i went to government school i didn't turn out to be a socialist but you know there was a lot of friction there between me and the school when i was there i didn't buy into what they were saying about evolution i didn't buy into what they were saying about evolution i didn't buy into what they were saying about politics we had a lot of disagreements or

earth day that was uh being pushed you know all these all these kids who are running for a class president all the rest of they were the ones out there carrying the placards about earth day and it's like oh man this is going to be difficult as they get older and I get older, but certainly it did a grant seven, seven, seven says, of course the FBI, the federal blockage of information agency. Yeah. They don't block it. They destroy it.

Allen BJ. It was an anti-white anti-Christian hate crime. That's why it was covered up. There's a lot more than we have not seen. Yona says the right to bear arms enforced by the state agents not allowed for most citizens anymore exactly right so let's talk about the Supreme Court case that Vox is so concerned their subtitle Democrats need to be smarter while the GOP is controlling the Supreme Court well they don't control the Supreme Court

unfortunately or maybe I don't know fortunately I don't know what the GOP would do. My son says there are people in the chat saying that they think the manifesto is suspicious because it's written in perfect cursive. But it isn't, though. It isn't. Again, these people have, by their actions, admitted that they think that it's right. And I think that it fits exactly with a narrative that they would not want you to see. They want to make it about the gun.

They don't want to make it about the killer. They don't want to make it about the hate. They don't want to make it about their curriculum. They don't want to make it about the DEI or the CRT or the Project 1619, any of that stuff. And this person had been totally immersed in that artificial world. So let's talk about the Supreme Court situation. Every now and then the Supreme Court says, Vox, remember these people are hard left. I'll read it to you as they write it, and then I'll comment here.

Every once in a while, the Supreme Court takes up a case involving a public official who acted so foolishly, without any regard for the ordinary norms governing law enforcement or without any insight into how their actions could undermine some of the government's most important work that you wish the justices could each take turns smacking them upside the head. Well, what is really happening here is that you have a state official who is a petty fogging little bureaucratic tyrant on a power trip just like jab send the arden or any of these other people right it is a type or trudeau or pick anybody pick some of the better known politicians but is it's a lesser known politician that acts just like these politicians on the world stage that we've seen to a nauseating extreme.

And they got called out on it because what happens is just like the governor in New Mexico, you know, well, I can order people to do anything I want as long as I say that it's about a coronavirus or pandemic. So I'm going to order you to not be allowed to have guns as a health issue. You know, I'm not going to pretend it's a pandemic, but, you know, the American Medical Association has said that gun violence is a pandemic. So I'm going to go with that. I'm going to say, well, you can't have guns now. And all the other Democrats are like, no, no, this is not going to work.

But these people get this taste of power. And the Boromir gene kicks in, you know, from Lord of the Rings. I can save everybody with my power here that i have the national rifle association versus vulo which the court announced that it would hear last friday is such a case it involves two unrelated actions which former new york state department of financial services superintendent maria vulo took against theRA. You see how this is? This is somebody in financial services for the state of New York deciding that

she's going to do gun control. There's no end to this. These little bureaucrats. She wasn't elected by anybody. She was an appointed bureaucrat. And she's going to take away your guns and she's going to find a way to do it. And they're all over the place, these people. And I hope they get slapped down.

Not for being stupid. For being a tyrant. Which is where they're coming from. So anyway, she took action against the NRA, one of which successfully shut down an NRA program that, and this is the words of Vox, an NRA program that recklessly endangered is the words of Vox, an NRA program that recklessly endangered countless New Yorkers' lives.

We'll explain what that is now. Sometimes Vox and the leftist press says things that are just so incredibly stupid that, in their own words, you just want to smack them upside the head. And that's exactly what this is. When is somebody going to smack smack them upside the head and that's exactly what this is when is somebody going to smack these people upside the head when you got people on the left journalist demanding censorship and all the rest of this stuff and anyway uh this doesn't recklessly endanger any new yorkers lives as a matter of fact it's there to preserve their lives, you see. And this is what the Second Amendment debate is about. A gun in the hands of a law-abiding citizen who is using it to defend their lives and the lives of others is something that the Founding Fathers said deserves a place of honor amongst all things that are good.

That's not what they're talking about. They're talking about putting guns in the hands of people that they have driven into insanity. First, stupidity. Then, insanity. Deliberately dumbing them down and then weaponizing these people. And so, in 2017,

the Department of Financial services in new york opened an investigation into carry guard carry guard this is an nra endorsed insurance program that according to the federal appeals court that heard the vulo case quote provided liability defense coverage for criminal proceedings resulting from firearm use, even where the insured acted with criminal intent. Now, let's talk about that. What does it mean to act with criminal intent? Well, if you were in a place like New York and they say you can't carry a gun or you can't carry a gun here, well, you're acting with criminal intent.

If they tell you that you can't use a firearm to protect yourself, you're acting with criminal intent. And of course there's going to be allegations of criminal intent. If the government is going to come after you for defending your life. But as we all, you know, as the axiom goes, it's better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by six take your

day in court instead of a coffin and uh so that's what this is but that's the spin of that court that's their characterization of it that's what al box characterized it uh you know anytime that they're going to make allegations against you and charges against you where you would use the carry guard they would come after you saying well you're charges against you, where you would use the carry guard. They would come after you and say, well, you're carrying this. And we don't like the way that you're doing it or the way that you're using the weapon to defend yourself. And we've seen this over and over again, haven't we? Especially in places like New York. Carry guard, says Vox, offered to pay both civil and criminal legal costs up to a million dollars for a civil case

and up to $150,000 for a criminal case. So they, you know, this is an insurance policy that the NRA offered to people and said if the customers who shot another person allegedly in self-defense, see now they put the allegedly in. They don't say even where the insured acted allegedly with criminal intent. Uh, but then when they talk about self-defense, they insert allegedly, they're not biased. Are they?

The courts are not biased. The press is not biased. Vox is not biased. Uh, one pitch to the NRA is members told them, quote, you should never be forced to choose between defending your life and putting yourself and your family in financial ruin. And I'm not going to show it, but I mean, there's a on social media. There was a video that was going around. It's a guy in California and he's walking up to his door and he's got cameras all over the place.

He's got a camera at the door front and he's got camera out on the side or anything and as he's fumbling in his pocket to get his keys some guy comes up and pokes a gun in his back with a mask on and everything so you see the guy running up and poking a gun he turns around and with his hand one hand he knocks the gun to the side and with the other hand he pulls out his um uh his concealed carry pistol and a gunfight ensues and other videos show them running around hiding behind cars and things like that but the bottom line that's what it's for well what's he going to do call the police file a report over his dead body and one of the things that he said was he said there's nothing and it looked like he had a very nice house.

He said, there's nothing in my house. It's worth, um, dying for, except for my family. That's in there. And so when the NRA says this,

you should never be forced to choose between defending your life and putting yourself and your family in financial rain. Again, go back and think about that Luby cafeteria shooting in Texas and the woman who was a dentist, and she carried. But at the time, Texas said you can't carry. So she would have been acting with a criminal intent if she had carried that pistol in.

So she left it in her glove compartment of her car. And then some lunatic drives, I think it was a pickup truck, drives it into the side of the Luby building, crashes it through, jumps out and starts shooting people. And at first she goes for her purse to get her, or I think it's where she kept her gun typically to get it. And then she realized she didn't have it.

And she was eating lunch with her parents. They tried to get them out of their water she thought they were following her when she ran after the shooting was going on for quite some time because the guy was just walking around you know shooting fish in a barrel shooting people in luby's cafeteria who were all unarmed because texas said you can't carry it and um so her parents died and she testified about that and she actually became a state representative and worked on that and now you know texas has constitutional carry finally constitutional carry is allowed here in tennessee as well new york generally does not permit insurance companies says vox to have contracts intended to, quote,

insure a person for that person's intentional criminal acts. You know, like constitutionally protecting yourself with a gun. And so not long after the Department of Financial Services in New York opened its investigation into Carryguard, three insurance companies that underwrote or administered carry guard or similar programs entered into a consent decree where they agreed to stop providing this kind of a insurance you see this is um now we're getting into the specifics of this case together the three companies also agreed to pay more than 13 million dollars in fines so this little bureaucrat

with the department of financial services in new york goes after these insurance companies and said well if you're going to pay the legal fees for somebody so they can have a day in court we don't want trial by jury come on you know just take the gun take these people throw them in jail steal their money do the process later maybe right yeah again you know this is the way people in New York like Donald Trump think. And so they said, you know, well, you don't want to do that, and so you better

back off of this, pay me $13 million, and get out of this, and don't do it again. And so Vox comments on that thuggery, that coercion, that blackmail, that defiance of the Constitution and our individual God-given rights.

Vox looks at that and says, well, that's all well and good. Nothing in the Constitution prohibits New York from targeting insurers who sell a product that will encourage people to shoot other people. That's not what this is about. This is about intimidating and targeting companies who defend our God-given rights as protected and respected under the Constitution. That's what this is about. But then the bureaucrat Vulo did something incomprehensibly stupid, according to Vox.

I thought the other stuff was stupid. After that happened, then you had the Parkland shooting. And after the shooting, this little bureaucrat at the department of financial services in new york issued a guidance which encouraged insurers to quote continue evaluating and managing their risks including reputational risks that may arise from dealing with the nra are similar gun promotion organizations. So now, after they got what they wanted and coerced and blackmailed these companies, now they're going to scold them, scold the NRA. And, you know, as I said before, teachers caring in Parkland would have been the only real defense against that. But they didn't take that.

The guidance and a similar post-Parkland communication between the Department of Financial Services in New York and the insurance industry do potentially violate the First Amendment, says Vox. And while the Constitution permits a government official to ask any company to stop doing business with the NRA, it does not typically permit the government to coerce private businesses. Wait a minute. What happened in 2020? I thought that was coercion of in 2021. I thought that was coercion of private businesses.

You'll lock down or I'll take everything that you've got. You and vaccinate your, your employees or fire them, or I'm going to make sure that you go out of business. Didn't we just go through all that? Now, Vox, of course, doesn't see that connection there. I see the connection there. And quite frankly, some of these people who I think should and could, and I hope they will, sue

over the damages that were done to them by Trump's lockdown, by Biden's mandates and the rest of this stuff. I hope that they sue. And I hope that if this goes the way that it should go, and the way that Vox is afraid that it's going to go, I hope they'll reference this case as well and say, you can't coerce private businesses into halting lawful business with an advocacy group. Well, lawful business with anybody.

When does the government get the opportunity to coerce? And again, it's going back to the fact that it was medical martial law. And it wasn't Vox. It was Daily Beast that criticized me for calling Trump's lockdown medical martial law and it wasn't vox it was a daily beast that um criticized me for calling trump's lockdown medical martial law can you believe how crazy this guy david knight is um so the guidance from this new york financial bureaucrat looks suspiciously like coercion they said yeah so do the jabs so do the the mandates about injecting your employees and all the rest of the stuff.

As a general rule, the government has a virtually unlimited right to express its own viewpoint, as do government officials. Okay, let's stop right there. Unless what? Unless that viewpoint is a Christian viewpoint. Unless you silently pray. Oh, that's not allowed. See?

Again, Vox has made two conclusions and extrapolations about this thing that affect both the medical martial law in 2020 and this ongoing suppression of a constitutionally protected free exercise of religious faith. We're not talking about establishment. That's a completely different thing. Establishment was when you had an official state religion, and all the states did have an official state religion.

One state would be Catholic, another one would be Baptist, another one would be Congregationalist, another one would be Presbyterian or Quaker or whatever. But those were official state religions. In some cases, you had to attend. In other cases, you had to merely pay. Some places, you had to do both. And very much like the official state religion of secular humanism and transgenderism and transhumanism that is put out in their seminaries

that we call government schools now. Those are religious institutions. They're selling you a worldview that has a lot of religious presumptions about it. It's a worldview, a comprehensive worldview, how you understand the world, how you act within it, what you're allowed to do, what you're not allowed to do. That is a comprehensive worldview, how you understand the world, how you act within it, what you're allowed to do, what you're not allowed to do. That is a comprehensive worldview. It is a religion that is being pushed in the schools. And you want to see what it produces? Take a look at that killer in Nashville.

And so then they referenced, they said, there was a 1963 case called Bantam Books versus Sullivan. The Supreme Court recognized that, quote, people do not lightly disregard public officers, thinly veiled threats to institute criminal proceedings against them if they do not come around. In other words, you know, government is basically a protection racket. You need to do this because I say so, and you wouldn't want something bad to happen to you.

So I'm going to protect you from the things that i would do or maybe a different uh group of people with a different set of uniforms would do so you better do this it's a protection racket just like the mafia bantam books involve the ominously named rhode island commission to encourage morality and youth a government body that identified books and magazines that had deemed objectionable for sale distribution or display to use under 18 years of age. So the only thing that's changed is now they've got, um, you know,

race pimps and Marxists who were writing this stuff and transgender perverts who are pushing what they think is, um, um, uh, the morality that should be given to youth. But the real problem is that government is teaching morality to youth. It doesn't matter who's morality, probably in 1963,

I would probably agree with what the government morality was at the time. Uh, but the principle remains the same. If you agree with the government putting out morality to kids, be aware that in 60 years, the government may completely change in terms of morality that is teaching kids, which that is what has happened now. And so the principle is that we don't want government teaching morality to kids. That is the real establishment of religion that everybody turns a blind eye to, including the conservatives. The conservatives want to run the school so they can teach their morality. The

liberals want to run schools so they can teach their morality. I don't want any of them teaching morality. It then sent notices to booksellers and distributors seeking their cooperation with the commission in removing the books that they had targeted and reminding those sellers of the commission's quote duty to recommend to the attorney general prosecution of purveyors of obscenity. So if you don't do what I say, I'm going to let these, I'm going to tell these other guys and they're going to come bust your head. Right? You know, you don't want to I say, I'm going to let these, I'm going to tell these other guys, and they're going to come bust your head, right?

You don't want to talk to Luca Brazzi or the local police official. I report you to. That's what it is, just the mafia. According to one book distributor, he was often visited by a police officer shortly after receiving such a notice. And the officer asked the distributor what steps he had taken in response to the notice. You know, just like we had these little bureaucrats coming around during the pandemic. You know, we told you that you got to put up signs about social distancing and masks and

all the rest of this stuff. Are you doing that? Oh, well, what authority do you have under law, sir? I'm telling you what to do. And I'm telling you that you don't do that. We've got many different ways that we can destroy your business completely, forever. You may think that this is going to destroy your business, and it might destroy your business, but I can guarantee that I will destroy your business if you don't put up signs demanding that people wear masks and keep apart from each other, put little stickers on the floor, tell everybody they got to come in one door and out the other, and all the rest of this stuff phantom books held that this level of pressure a level that explicitly mentioned the possibility of prosecution followed by a visit from an inquisitive police officer

an inquisitive police officer nobody expects a spanish inquisition right that's what they got they said it crosses the line from permissible persuasion to impermissible coercion. Yeah. As I said during the pandemic, go ahead and give me your medical opinion and your medical recommendation. I like to have second opinions and third opinions and so forth.

But guess what? I'm not taking orders from any doctor. I'm not taking. But guess what? I'm not taking orders from any doctor. I'm not taking orders from Fauci. I'm not taking orders from Trump. I'm not taking orders from Biden. And you don't have the authority to give those. But that's basically what happened in Vulo. And this is what this person is saying.

Saying essentially the same thing that happened in 1963. So Vox is saying that, well, now looks like this person has overstepped their thought you think they overstepped from the very beginning even when vox thought it was something good the nra says vox has sought an extraordinary remedy in this vulo case according to the complaint it filed in the trial court that heard this case the nra wants a court order requiring the new york department Financial Services to, quote, immediately cease and refrain from engaging in any conduct or activity which has the purpose or the effect of interfering with, terminating or diminishing any of the NRA's contracts and or business relationships with any organizations.

And so Vox thinks that's extraordinary. What's extraordinary about that? They're just asking for relief from a little bureaucratic tyrant who thinks that they can threaten anybody who's doing business with an organization that they don't like. And that's the principle that's involved here.

I know that we're incapable of thinking in the abstract in terms of principles as a country, but it doesn't matter whether you like the NRA or not. But for the liberals, they don't like anybody being able to do anything outside of the government's permission. Among other things, says Vox, that could prevent New York from enforcing its law prohibiting insurers from selling products that encourage people to shoot other people. They can't give up that line. This is not something that encourages people to shoot other people. Now, they might

have a little bit more of an argument with this case, but this is not what this is. This is a news item, as we have Thanksgiving coming up. Florida roofer offers customers AR-15s and a turkey if they let him do the roof. And he's not encouraging people to shoot other people. He just said this is a great gun. Just like, you know, hey, this is a great SUV. Don't use it to run people down in a Christmas parade, okay? That's not what it's for.

And the AR-15 and no other gun is there to shoot innocent people. It's there to defend life. That's what it's about. It's there to kill killers. It's like a double negative, right? Negative one times negative one is a positive one. And so that is our algebraic equation here for how these guns work. But, of course, the liberals don't do math either.

A Florida roofing company is making a holiday offer to customers. Buy a roof, get a turkey for Thanksgiving, and an AR-15 to protect your family again you know as joy behar would explain to us they can't go turkey shooting with an ar-15 just be nothing left well that may be turkey but anywhere yet but not a deer okay she was saying that about deer uh the world's a crazy place right now said the president of the roofing company, RoofEasy. And they can get a roof and an AR-15 for protection on both ends. Why not? Yeah, your roof protects you, and so does your AR-15. They're located in Cape Coral, Florida.

He said, I actually saw this idea. A company did it in Alabama. So I figured, hey, we're in Florida. This is the most Florida thing you can do, so let's do it. Any homeowner who wants to participate in the deal has to follow the same rules as if they were buying a gun themselves. He said, uh, that means that you've got to go through a background check. And then three days later, when the, um, uh, the government approves you exercising your God given rights,

then you can go down and pick up your gun from him. Uh, he said, he went on to say everybody needs an ar-15 he said they liberals think that it stands for assault rifle and you know people like joy behar think that it's something like an rpg but uh he says it doesn't it's a normal rifle is what it stands for uh he said um if a homeowner doesn't want the free gun, they'll deduct $500 from their roofing bill. And, of course, others have done this. There was a Ford dealership that did it. This article points out from Fox News.

Instead, a Ford dealership did this in South Carolina back in 2019, giving out guns and Bibles. So, again, cling to your guns, your Bibles, and your Ford. Just don't be bitter about it. No bitterness necessary. And a Wisconsin glassmaking company in 2018 gave all of their employees a gun of their own choice. There you go. That's important.

John Bennett, thank you very much for the tip. He says, thank you, David, for all you do. Well, thank you, and bless you and your family. That is a blessing to us. Thank you very much. By the way, let me, while I get this, I didn't mention this yesterday. I had a couple of people who have been supporters for quite a while and contacted us many times, and they both asked for prayer.

So I wanted to pass this on to all of you as well. We told them we'd pray for them, and we did. But it is funny, as I said before, you know, God asks us to pray, yet he's sovereign, and yet, you know, he wants us to be able to see the results in this. And so there's also corporate prayer that we're told to ask for. And I think the important thing about that is that the body of people who are praying can see that their prayer was answered. That's the whole point. And God knows what we need. But we can see this. And when we see him working in response to this it glorifies him and

i gotta say that uh it has been at the foundation of my personal faith in god and in christ to see these prayers answered and um and in ways that cannot be explained on different things i won't go into all the details about it but over the years to be able to see that happen in a way that cannot be explained by coincidence or wishful thinking or interpretation or whatever. That's why I would also encourage people, if you have questions about that or struggling with it, look at the diary of George Mueller, kept a detailed diary over his life. And it was truly amazing, truly amazing. And I encourage you to keep a diary of, uh, when you ask God for things and when he, uh, answers those. And so let me just, uh, throw this out real quickly. Uh, a listener in love of the road,

uh, prayer requests for his mother. Um, he said, you mentioned having an issue of bacterial infection from root canals. He said, either Thursday or Friday. Last week, he said his mother is going under. And, okay, this is sent on November the 5th. So, I missed the day. But you can still pray for them. She had a root canal earlier this year.

Had a lot of problems with it. She tried using oregano oil to get rid of the infection that didn't take um so the surgery will hopefully take care of it tomorrow so you can pray that that will take care of it for her and um so anyway um and i'll mention that whole thing about the root canals again i've seen so much stuff about root canals and infections and how it festers with stuff i just had mine taken out um you know and i'd had some problems with him and i had him taken out uh and this is uh from uh someone who has also supported the program for quite some time charlie says for the past 22 years i've hoped and prayed that there'd be successful lawsuits

and legal resistance to the outrages and the intrusions that take place at airports and by the way uh you saw that the tsa is going to we got the chinese are going to start demanding people wear masks and the tsa is going to go back to they want to swab people now oh it'll, they say, but we'll see about that, how long that lasts. But they want to swab you and test you for flu. Can't have flu. If you got flu, you can't fly. Or RSV, or a rhinovirus, or a coronavirus, because, you know, coronavirus is a whole, you know, family of these things. So again, you know you know they're going to they're putting in that health dictatorship and the health pass and permissions tsa wants to be like china they really do our government does and so he says um he's got a situation where he's got to travel

cross-country and he says i'm giving into the system by applying for one of those travel cards so for the last 22 years you know since 2001 he hasn't wanted to get involved in this stuff but country. And he says, I'm giving into the system by applying for one of those travel cards. So for the last 22 years, you know, since 2001, he hasn't wanted to get involved in this stuff, but he says he finally has to do it because of his age and because the age of his car, he can't do a cross country thing. And because of the time they said he used to fly regularly, but no more, but he has to do it now. And he says, last time I drove cross-country, nearly wrecked me. So here's his prayer request. He said, please pray that I'll endure this with dignity and aplomb.

Because that's a real trial, isn't it? You just want to lash out at these people, verbally if not physically. I understand. I understand. I have that feeling as well. He says, please pray that I'll endure this interview here where he's got the travel card or where he's interacting with TSA, I think, even if the interviewer is nasty or aggressive.

And so, again, pray for Charlie with that. Some of the other comments. My son said, just when I thought TSA's pat downs couldn't get any more invasive, they have to swab you in case you got a bomb shoved up your nostril. That's right. Just like American Carol. I mean, they put that thing out American Carol,

having people literally strip at the airport. Uh, they did that before the underwear bomber. We got to stop telling these people what to do. Even if it's a joke or sci-fi, they take it as a manual of what to do. Risha M. MKUltra. Never stopped.

That's right. Today, MKUltra is called social networking, says Jim Z7. The Joker Ace says, expanded to mass conditioning entire generations. And Distorted Perception says, media has us all hating each other yeah i've seen a lot of videos of blacks jumping white kids straight versus gay versus muslim versus jew world war three things are all messed up and we're going to see chaos and that's the whole thing you know that's why i don't want to show pictures of the massacre i don't want to that that happened in israel i don't want to show pictures of the bombings and the kids bodies that are blown apart i don't want to show pictures

of the strikes against buildings and envoys and all the rest of this stuff and the violence and the hatred that is there and when you show this stuff all it does is feed that you know people look at that and say yeah yeah, yeah, I told you that group is just like that. Everybody in that group is just like that. That's why I don't want to show this kind of stuff. Because you look at that and say, yeah, that's the, that's the opinion I had of that group that I don't like. And look at them doing that now again. I showed that one video, I've showed it a couple of times and it was, you know, Jew And it was Israeli army, Israeli officer, and some Orthodox Jews that were there. And the fact that the political entity is attacking the Orthodox Jews who don't agree with the politics of this war.

And that's the reason I show that. It's because we've got to understand several things. First of all, the other people are not monolithic. There's going to be differences of opinions. You know, I've talked over and over again about how you've got Jews and Arabs trying to come together in Israel and Gaza and other places. And the Palestinians trying to stop this and to work for peace. You have at the same time, you got violent Palestinians in New York, uh, rioting and,

you know, protesting and stuff. You got peaceful protest of Jews saying, let's have a ceasefire. Let's stop this war and grand centralization. Laura, large number of them. What does the media cover?

They cover the violence. They cover the hate. They don't cover the peace. Yeah. They don't cover Gerald Slenty's Occupy Peace. So again, that's what we need to do. But we understand that our future, our life is not under the control of politicians. It really isn't. Because this time that we have on earth that may be controlled by politicians is just a short period of time.

And we need to take that eternal view of it. We need to understand that God is in control. He's not going to allow anything to happen that isn't going to be ultimately to our benefit, even if it results in our death. It's going to be ultimately to our benefit. That's the perspective we need to take on this. And so when we look at what is happening, we understand that God doesn't control, that

God controls things, not the government, not the president, not the Congress, not the speaker, not any of these people, right? Even if they start a war, they do not have any power over us ultimately. So we don't need to freak out about this stuff. Stay calm, carry on, stay in contact with God, use this as an opportunity. Every time you go through a crisis, use it as an opportunity to get closer to God. That's what he uses these crises for. So don't waste it, right? You know, the left never wastes a crisis. They always use it to push their agenda of chaos and oppression. Well, don't you as a Christian ever miss this opportunity of a problem and a crisis? Use it to get closer to God god because that's what

god's agenda is is to get you closer to him hal 9000 watson i wonder if new york is trying to go after body armor well actually yes i had the story about kathy holkel the governor she tried to outlaw body armor and then she went to israel as a virtue signaling political trip and she wore the same armor that she tried to outlaw in um in new york state now that prohibited i don't know if she got she successfully did it or not uh trump burger forever politicians wanting to ban guns need to put their money where their mouth is and decline their own armed secretary yeah i've heard there are only one or two uh concealed carry uh insurance companies will actually pay out before a trial sadly most of them require you to go broke first no that's that's sad uh georgia boy 11 42 just buy the turkey and the rifle it's a lot cheaper than a

roof that's right that's right a lot cheaper than a roof. That's right. That's right. But if you need a roof anyway, might as well get the free turkey and the rifle. And you might as well support somebody who supports the second amendment, even if it is for a, uh,

for, uh, attention. Andy says, I had a root canal go bad. It was my fault for not having the permanent crown put on a timely matter. Had that thing pulled instead. Yeah. Um,

yeah, I had a one that i had put in i mean they were putting like bleach or something that's what it tastes and you know it's disinfectant and and then they just kept doing it over and over again it's like get this thing out of my mouth uh so as we look at how they are um uh working against us we've got a single group of 1,200 migrants surge across the Arizona border. And this is not the only one. We have caravan after caravan after caravan. I've shown you the picture a couple of times of the 5,000 people coming through.

But that's typically one day. That's happening every day. That's not an extraordinary event. And so, you know, in Tucson, Arizona, single group of migrants, initial headcount was over 1,200. Of course, all of them released. All of them released. And these are not just people coming from Mexico.

These are people coming from Central and South America, coming from China, coming from the Middle East, coming from Africa. They're coming from everywhere. coming from the Middle East, coming from Africa, coming from everywhere. This is what Biden wants. Saturday's group was just one of two large groups of more than a thousand migrants to cross the border near San Miguel since November the 1st. They will likely be released to non-government migrant shelters in the coming days, just released into our country since October the 1st, in the tucson sector more than 60 000 migrants have poured in making it the busiest sector in the nation san miguel alone is just one crossing point located within the sector experiencing a surge

of migrant crossings you see when we look at what is happening even in sanctuary cities like new york city, we're full up. We can't handle it anymore. I mean, this is an attack on us from Biden, just like all the banning of appliances and of oil and of energy and all the rest. Everything Biden is doing is an attack on America. He's not just at war with other countries. He's at war with us in this country.

Here's an example. You have, if take a look at Afghanistan, since we left, we have given them $11 billion after we're gone, after we were thrown out, after we lost the war 11 billion dollars to afghanistan and this is from the uh this is the the american government saying this the special inspector general for afghan reconstruction he's got an acronym for that cigar give that man a cigar s-i-g-a-r cigar it works out to 80 million dollars every 10 to 14 days they've been giving the people uh who uh oh you know in afghanistan uh putting giving that money to the people that um in this particular case uh we lost the war uh we used to do that all the time after we would defeat somebody we would give them money as a matter matter of fact, there's a funny Peter Sellers movie called The Mouse That Roared.

I'll play the trailer of it. But does this not describe American foreign policy to a T as a satire? And this goes back to the 1960s. Why is the smallest country on earth declaring war against the United States? There isn't a more profitable undertaking for any country than to declare war on the United States and to be defeated. No sooner is the aggressor... Or to win. The New Americans pour in food, machinery, clothing, technical aid, and lots and lots of money for the relief of its former enemies.

We must declare war on the United States. I'm Field Marshal and Chief Constable Tully Bascom and you're prisoners of war. I know it'll come... Bow and arrow. ...a pleasant one, I hope, but we thought of one blithering idiot. And what are they going to do now? How am I going to tell the president that we've been successfully invaded by a bunch of 15th century Europeans? Oh dear, this is most terribly complicated.

Peter Sellers. Peter Sellers. century europeans oh dear this is most terribly complicated peter sellers peter sellers and peter sellers in the comedy classic the mouse that roared yeah only difference is is that instead of a small country of men armed with bows and arrows inv invading our country. We invaded their country after we were told that these people living in caves with bows and arrows had taken down three steel skyscrapers with two jet planes and had flown a jet at an altitude that is lower and faster than that jet could possibly go in real life to attack the Pentagon and so many other lies. And, uh, but it's always about the money, isn't it?

And that $11 billion is an addition to the astronomical amount of state of the art weapons, which they've now been able to sell, uh, to, uh, you know, probably to the people in Gaza or whatever to Hamas. Uh, but, uh, that, that doesn't include the $11 billion that we paid since we got thrown out of Afghanistan. It does not include that money. And the pallets of cash. Remember the massive pallets of cash that were left behind? Vehicles, weapons, cash, all this stuff.

And we're still paying them. $11 billion, $80 million every 10 days to 10 to 14 days. And so in addition to that, we see something else. The UN has said that opium supply in Afghanistan has dropped 95% under the Taliban. So we were using this, as we know, for the longest time. Geraldo Rivera actually did a report 20 years ago. He said, look, we got U.S. troops that are guarding the poppy fields. Oh, well, we need to keep their economy going. Their economy going? You mean your economy going. You mean your drug war and your DEA and your CIA and your black ops, that economy, that's the economy we've got to keep going.

Because it's the U.S. government that's behind the drug war. The U.S. government that's pushing it. The U.S. government that is creating stuff like the crack cocaine epidemic. I wouldn't be surprised if fentanyl was a creation of the U.S. government and CIA as well. Time will tell. But it's our phony drug war. Our phony Afghanistan war. And of course, no matter what happens, we always pay. You know, in Afghanistan, we were there for the opium and for the lithium. The opium was part of the drug war. The lithium is part of the climate war

against us. And understand the drug war is not a war against drugs. It is a war where they use drugs against us. And they use drugs against us to destroy our constitution, our rule of law, and to corrupt our institutions. That's what the drug war is about. And the climate war is another government war against us to destroy everything that we've got, to shut down all energy, to shut down food. We are really at the war horsemen of the apocalypse, aren't we? Pestilence, famine, war. That is the policy of pretty much every government against its own people now.

By the way, not just every government, but every politician. Trump didn't get us out of this phony war. Instead, he came up with a phony agreement. I'll end the war after my term ends, my first term. I'm not going to do it my first term. I'll do it in May of 2021. Same thing he did by saying, well, I'm not going to get out of the climate agreement. Not that he has any say. He didn't have any say about that. And neither did Biden or John Kerry, who said they self-ratified it. And if you're going to take the position that they could put us into a treaty, then Trump could take the position he's going to take us out of it.

But that's not what was really going on anyway. It was really Mitch McConnell who should have said, well, we're going to vote. We'll see about that. You don't ratify treaties, Kerry, Obama. It's the Senate that ratifies treaties, but Mitch McConnell didn't want to do that. And he could have done that at any time,

even after the 2020 election during that transition period. Mitch McConnell could have done it. I remember having, um, but I can't remember his name and not Mark Moreno, but, um, uh, another climate guy that I worked with, he was, uh, calling on Mitch McConnell to have that, uh, guy that does junk science.com can't remember his name right now. Anyway. Um, so, uh, so Trump said, well, you said well you know when uh i'll get out of the climate paris climate accord but i'll do it after the 2020 election like what's that i'll get

out of afghanistan but i'll do it after the 2020 election i'll do it in may so yeah he made that phony statement and then of course um you know biden didn't abide by that either so they threw us out uh but trump had campaigned on getting us out, but he didn't do it for four years. He said, well, I'll do it sometime in the next term. You see how that happens, right? How that works. Anyway, while we were guarding Afghanistan, by the way, it's not just that the supply of opium in Afghanistan has dropped by 95%.

When we were there, they were having record bumper crops every year. And the entire time that we were in Afghanistan, Afghanistan supplied over 90%, sometimes as much as 95%. But over 90% of the world's opium came out of Afghanistan while we were there. And it went from like 10% up to 90% while our war on drugs was happening there. The let's take a look at some other things that are happening in the news. Tyson has recalled 30,000 pounds of fun nuggets due to metal contamination. I wonder how much those fun nuggets weighed if they didn't have the metal in them.

Tyson Food, the same company that I just pointed out a couple of days ago, has now joined with a Dutch World Economic Forum company to start producing bugs. Surprise, surprise, Tyson has got metal in its fun nuggets i guess they've gone from being a part of wef to a part of wtf what is their fun nuggets with metal in them but they're not the only ones you've got a couple of companies that are having to recall cinnamon applesauce pouches again this is for kids you know fun nuggets and applesauce pouches this is kids food this kid's food has got lead in it

two more companies are recalling fruit puree pouches due to potential contamination with lead, uh, according to the FDA. But of course the FDA is not concerned about the injections, the genetic code injections that have graphene in them. They don't care about that. They don't care about the DNA contamination, but no, they're going to tell you that you've got to stop using the BVO and you got to, uh, you know, we're going to ban this color dye and all the rest of stuff i tell you talk about straining and gnats and swallowing a camel hold or injecting a camel

hole um schnooks branded pouches uh sold at that store and eat well markets as well as weiss branded pouches sold at their grocery stores in addition to a third company uh the wanna banana wanna banana apple cinnamon puke puree sold by a lot of different retailers including sam's club amazon dollar tree that we called last month uh their minds but when they're giving them the lead when karen and i went to the uk like i said you we were, we had no money when we went in 1980. And so we just hung around and, uh, uh, we would go to everything that was free. All the free museums went to museum after museum, after museum, one of the ones that we went to, they had a class coming through there and they were trying to teach them about, um, uh, life in Tudor England.

And so they had the costumes that were very detailed and they were Velcroed up the back so i'd have a couple of students and they'd get up there and they put their arms through this thing and the velcroed in the back and then they would talk about life and a tudor england and they said you know everybody except the king king was eating off a silver plates of course uh but everybody else is eating off a lead plates and the teacher said so how do you think you would feel if you ate lead it's like oh she says yes and he says heavy but uh that's our lead and kids that's what i always think about but uh yeah this is uh this is our food supply the fda though is right on it and they're encouraging uh if even as they want to get some of the lead contamination out they want graphene in your vaccines and they want bugs and the rest of

your food we'll be right back Thank you. I don't know. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Hear news now at APSradioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story. I had a couple of commenters say that they had fentanyl used on them during some procedures in the hospital and that it wasn't that great a pain reliever. The same thing has been said about the opioids, which fentanyl is supposed to be a more concentrated form of that. And so, yeah, it is interesting. But, boy, I feel like they really can be addictive.

You know, like the crack cocaine stuff that we um that they we know that they put together for their to fund their war uh let's talk about elections i need to talk about what is um it's unavoidable i guess that i've got to talk about this trump situation let's put it in the proper context here uh trump and his allies plot revenge says the washington post and of course this isn't just an attack piece from the Washington Post. Yes, they do attack him. Yes, they don't like him. But understand that he's openly talking about it. Yeah, I'm going to get even with these people.

And his lawyer, Ty Cobb, said he's a deeply wounded narcissist and capable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest and out of revenge. And so, you know, remember, I played the clip for you yesterday. I played just a little bit of it here. Trump talking about Hillary. Well, I think her history is far from being over. I'd like to answer that question in another 15 years from now. I think she's going to go down at a minimum as a great senator. I think she is a great wife to a president. And I think Bill Clinton was a great president. You know, you look at the country then. The economy was doing great. Look at what happened during the Clinton years. I mean, we had no war. The economy was doing great. It sounds like the way he describes himself. He's just like the Clintons.

Because we're jealous as hell. You know, people get jealous and they hate you. People don't like them because they're jealous of them. But Bill Clinton was a great president. I mean, I hope we can be so lucky in terms of the economy and in terms of other aspects. I mean, we weren't in wars with Tunisia. I'm not blaming Afghanistan, by the way, is probably a place that we should be. Iraq, we shouldn't be. Bill Clinton was a great president. Hillary Clinton is a great woman and a good woman.

Yeah, okay. Well, he said, I'd like to go back and revisit that in 15 years. Interestingly enough, it's almost been exactly 15 years. He said that on November the 12th, 2008. And so here we are on November the 7th. We're only five days away from exactly 12 years to the date that he said that, talking about how wonderful Hillary was. And remember when people said, you've always been a friend of Hillary's, and you've supported Hillary, and we had a lot of people. You've got Fox News out there after RFK Jr. said he's going to run as a third-party candidate. They wanted to take him down, and so they said, well, he has endorsed Hillary Clinton three times.

So has Trump, who they're pushing, who they're afraid to criticize. him down and so they said well he has endorsed hillary clinton three times so has trump who they're pushing who they're afraid to criticize and uh it's not to say that they any of them are right it just goes to show that they are as evil as she is that's well they all say that she's uh really good she must be maybe i was wrong about hillary no i'm not wrong about hillary uh but uh yeah when he was called out on that people say saying, you've always been a supporter of Hillary and you've given her money and all the rest of this stuff, you say great things about her. Uh, she was at your daughter's wedding. I paid her to be there. He said, you see how that works. You pay politicians in order to get them to do things for you. And so he wanted to be a politician.

So people would pay him like the big pharmaceutical companies did after he had RFK Jr. In to bid his price up, they paid him and he put in the pharmaceutical executive, the CEO of Eli Lilly. They put him in and Trump put him in as head of the FDA. I'm sorry. H and HHS brought other guys in like Scott Gottlieb to be the head of the FDA. I'm sorry, HHS brought other guys in, like Scott Gottlieb, to be the

head of the FDA, who was working for Pfizer and has now gone back to work for Pfizer. That revolving door. So that's how politics works in Trump's mind. People pay you to do things for them. I want to be the person who's collecting the money and handing out the favors to people instead of somebody who's having to pay Hillary to come to my wedding. I mean, wouldn't that be awful if you had to pay Hillary to come to your wedding? Pay her to stay far, far away from my daughter's wedding. Anyway, the Washington Post says Donald Trump and his allies have begun mapping out specific plans for using the federal government to punish cities and opponents should he win a second term. With the former president naming individuals that he wants to investigate or prosecute.

And his associates drafting plans to potentially invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to allow him to deploy the military against civil demonstrators. This is not just the Washington Post making this stuff up because they hate him. I mean, it sounds really bad, doesn't it? Except there's a lot of people out there with MAGA who would say, that's good, I hope he does that. Well, you understand that you're pushing a civil war, right? And Trump understands that this is Banana Republic stuff because he will condemn this as Banana Republic stuff

and then at the same breath, he will come back and say, but now I can do it to them. So they made it into a Banana Republic, so now I'm going to be Banana Republic back to them. And then everybody can fight a civil war over which dictator do you want to rule this Banana Republic with nuclear weapons, Biden or Trump. That's where we are with this. In public, Trump has vowed to appoint a special prosecutor to go after in his words, go after Biden and his family. He says, now Washington Post, this is where their bias comes in. Ridiculous. And he's frequently made corruption accusations against Biden and his family that are not supported

by available evidence. See, that's where Washington Post is lying to you. Very well documented. He said, it would resemble a banana republic if people came into office and started going after their opponents willy-nilly, said a constitutional law professor at the University of Virginia. It's hardly something that we should aspire to, but it is. said a constitutional law professor at the University of Virginia, it's hardly something that we should aspire to, but it is.

And, you know, are we going to have a civil war over Trump and over his petty vendettas and vengeance? Because that's really what January 6th was about, you understand. It was Trump who gave us a lockdown mail-in election. It was Trump who locked us down. It was Trump who gave us a lockdown mail-in election. It was Trump who locked us down. It was Trump who created the poison injection. And yet you had people showing up on January the 6th to do whatever was necessary to keep that guy in office. And as I said at the time, first of all, I knew it was a grift.

I pointed that out. That's why I got fired. And I'm glad. I have no regrets about that. And it was a lie. It was a grift to stop the steal stuff that Alex did, that Save America stuff that Trump did. That was a lie.

They threw their own supporters after they ripped them off. They threw them under the bus and threw the entire conservative movement under the bus, knowing that it would be used like this. I knew. They knew. They knew fully well. I was there. I knew they knew. They knew fully well I was there. I know they knew. I told them.

And they didn't deny it. So, you know, don't tell me that I'm misconstruing this stuff. I was there. You weren't. Okay? President Trump has always stood for law and order and protecting the Constitution, said a person who's organized a pact for him is that true he's always stood for law and order he stood for the law he stood for

the constitution the guy who said take the guns and do the due process later the guy who said where i'm going to do an executive order to ban bump stocks and do gun control by executive order. The guy who said, uh, got to get the shot. You got to get the shot. Yeah. Yeah. That guy always obeyed the law and the constitution.

Uh, so in, uh, New Hampshire in October, Trump said, this is third world country stuff. Arrest your opponent. And then he says, and that means that I can do it too.

You see? In the same breath. This is third world stuff and I'm going to do it. You want somebody like that? You want a third world dictator like Biden? And he is. You want a corrupt dictator like Biden? Or do you want a corrupt dictator like Trump?

Who wants to be bribed? He wants third world order stuff. He doesn't want the Constitution. Believe him when he tells you this stuff. When he says, I'm the father of the vaccine and all the rest of this stuff. Believe him when he takes credit for this stuff. Believe him when he says that he wants a civil war. Because that's what he's talking about.

January the 6th j6 part do and the people who are rotting in jail as this guy is complaining about how he's the victim i think the people are the victim of trump or his supporters who are rotting in jail he's still at large you know he goes on the stand and that's what we're going to talk about here he goes on the stand uh believe him when he says that instead you know he also knows my people my people the grace they would still vote for me they still support me even if i shot somebody on the street fifth avenue uh kelly uh general kelly who was his chief of staff said they would expect trump to investigate him because since his term as chief of staff ended, he has publicly criticized Trump, including by alleging that he called dead service members suckers.

He also said, get that disabled guy in a wheelchair out of here. No, he wants to see that. He's a loser, right? Kelly added, he said, there's no question in my mind that he's going to go after the people that have turned on him well i guess that's i'm okay because i never really supported him i thought he's maybe better than hillary clinton but uh you know not much different actually i had not seen that clip of a 2008 uh and julian julian assange had not seen that clip of 2008. And Julian Assange had not seen it either.

Remember, that was my attitude. You know, well, we know what Hillary Clinton is. We don't yet know what Trump is. So, you know, vote against what we do know is evil. But now we know that Trump is evil, and I'm not supporting him in any way, shape, or form. I wouldn't support him in 2020. I won't support him ever. You know, I want Trump for prison, just like Hillary for prison. But Trump allies such as Russ Vaught, his former budget director who now

leads the Center for Renewing America, are actively repudiating the modern tradition of a measure of independence for the Justice Department, arguing that such independence is not based in the law or the Constitution. Voight is in regular contact with Trump and would be expected to hold a major position in the second term. In other words, you want to complain that we got a Department of Justice that is politically

weaponized? That's what Trump wants to do. Just like I said about the schools. I don't want the schools instilling morality in kids. It all began when they were instilling a morality that was in line with parents for the most part, the vast majority of parents. Now they're instilling morality that is antithetical

to what most parents want. And they're grooming these kids to mutilate themselves. But the principle is that if you're going to allow the schools to instill morality you're going to get there eventually and if you're going to say well the Justice Department is going to be weaponized against my political enemies that's what Trump is saying and that's what Russ Voight is saying and they're talking about how they are going to do their own lawfare. Warfare through the law.

And so it's not going to be any different. We've also heard Trump say, well, we're going to do a better job of ballot stuffing. He already gave us one of the worst ways, one of the worst corruptions of our election process with the mail-out ballots to everybody. And now he wants to do ballot harvesting. He thinks he can do ballot harvesting better than them. He thinks he can weaponize the Department of Justice better than them. I don't want any of that stuff. That's one of the reasons why I adamantly oppose Donald Trump,

because he's no different from Hillary Clinton. He's cut from the same mold. He is a totalitarian, petty fogging, narcissistic tyrant who disrespects the constitution and hates us. Hillary Clinton called us, um, uh,

despicable, right? Or what was it? What deplorable? Thank you. Yeah, it was, uh,

that was like, that was Sylvester. Thank you. Yeah. It was, uh, that was like, that was Sylvester said, you're the specable. Uh, Hillary Clinton said we're deplorable. And then Trump said, we're non-essential. What's the difference?

What's the difference. Okay. Uh, so, and I'll just say this because he wants to use government to get even with his enemies. And that's what this is all about. Trump doesn't want to debate. He doesn't care about the policies.

He doesn't care about you and I. He's going to push the World Economic Forum's goals, just like he did in his first term, especially in his fourth year. He doesn't care about policies. He doesn't care about the Constitution. He doesn't care about you any more than he cared about the january the sixers instead what he cares about is his own power and his ability to get revenge and in all of this

just understand that when he um he says he's going to get revenge that this is antithetical to Christian principles. This is antithetical to the Christian principles that founded our country. He is antithetical to Christ. He is an antichrist. You understand who you're supporting if you're supporting this guy. And he is against the Constitution as well. Constitution doesn't have any clauses in there about weaponizing the government against your political enemies. But that's exactly what he wants to do.

And so understand that as you look at all of this political warfare against him, as I said before, are we going to become the monsters that we fight? Well, Trump wants to become the monster that he says he's fighting. He wants to become Hillary. He wants to become Joe Biden. He wants to be better at being a monster than they are. And so, quite frankly, that's why I don't care about this being weaponized against him. He didn't care when they were censoring us.

He only cared when they censored him. And most conservatives only cared when he got censored. They didn't care when they were censoring us. He only cared when they censored him. And most conservatives only cared when he got censored. They didn't care when they were censored. They didn't care when other people were censored, but they cared when Trump was censored. We live vicariously. There's this little tyrant, this little antichrist. And so it's interesting to see Mark Meadows,

another chief of staff, is now being sued by his book publisher. They want to get their $350,000 book advance back. They're also seeking a million dollars in damages. They said he lied in his memoir. I guess the publisher now wants to stop the steal because he's stealing money from them uh he he said the main theme of his own book was that the 2020 election was stolen from trump the lawsuit comes after meadows reportedly told the special council investigating trump that he'd warned the former president again of making claims of fraud that neither he nor his boss really believed the election had been stolen

this is another one of these examples of when you tell the public one thing and you say something else when you're in court under oath and looking at prison time. And so he told his publisher one thing and he told the public and the MAGA crowd that he thought would buy this book another thing. And then when push came to shove and they put him under oath in a courtroom oh then he says something completely different he doesn't want to risk jail there and we have seen that as a matter of fact this whole ray epps thing and i don't know or care whether ray epps was a fed or not i'm just telling you that whatever ray epps whatever one federal um um agent provocateur

could do pales in comparison to what alex jones did or what donald trump did or what uh you know any of these people did pales in comparison and the reason they're focusing on reabs is to distract people from what they did and so we had um as darren beattie revolver focuses on re-ups and things like that tucker carlson and all the rest um as he focuses on that you know one of the people and i forget the guy's name he's whispering in his ear and when he was under oath in court he said no, no, he didn't tell. He told me not to do that. He didn't tell me to go, you know, attack the barricade. He told me not to do that.

That's what he said when he was under oath. Then he gets off, he gets out of the court, and he gets on MAGA radio, conservative radio, and he's telling everybody exactly that. No, he told me to go do that. He told me to attack the barricade and everything. This is the same thing Mark Meadows is doing. He tells his publisher who's going to produce a book to sell it to the MAGA crowd. Oh, yeah, Donald Trump won.

I'm with him 100%. And then when he's in court facing jail for lying, if he commits perjury, then he tells the truth. We saw the same thing with with bannon steve bannon you know recording three days before it happened he said okay here's the plan okay we're going to lose but then we're going to use this thing he's telling his chinese investors or you know we're going to lose this election but then we're going to take this in and you know say that it was stolen from us that's the plan that. That's the game plan. So the book was called The Chief's Chief. And the publishing company has pulled it a day before they filed the lawsuit. It said, Meadows reported statements to the

special prosecutor and or his staff and his reported grand jury testimony squarely contradict the statements in his book. One central theme of which is that President Trump was a true winner of the 2020 presidential election and that the election was stolen and rigged with help from allies and liberal media who ignored actual evidence of fraud right there in plain sight for anybody to analyze, leading to the wrongful election of President Trump, said the lawsuit from the publisher. And they pointed out that chapter one begins with a sentence,

all uppercase. I knew he didn't lose. And so the publisher is suing him. They want their advanced back of $350,000 and they want an additional million in damages. It was published a year after Trump lost the sheer volume of falsehoods that have been published about the president's time in the white house is astounding. Um,

said Meadows. I consider this book to be a small opportunity to correct the record. A lawsuit details how the alarm was raised by the publisher in December, 2021, just before publication, they contacted him with concerns that the book might include misstatements. But they said they would proceed with the publishing of the book, but they were withholding the final $116,000 advance while they investigated.

And now they want it all back. Evidently, they've given him $350,000 in addition to this $116,000 that they left out. They said Mr. Meadows is aware of the specious allegations published regarding a portion of the book, which was taken out of context and which have already been addressed by both Mr. Meadows at his lawyer and so forth. So again, this is all taken out of context. Well, here's the context.

Number the first sentence of the first chapter. He didn't lose the election in all uppercase. My son says when they lie about this, it legitimizes all the corruption in their mail-out election. Yeah, that's right. Risha M., thank you for the tip on Rockfin. Jeff Ingram

says, Letitia James' campaign on getting Trump now when Trump wants to do the same thing, he's the bad guy. Yeah, he is. He is. He is. Because he's embracing the same tactic. He is a bad guy.

He's become the monster that he says, I'm being attacked by these monsters. I'm going to be a monster too. You see? They take an oath to the Constitution. And you should condemn him for bragging about the fact that he's going to violate the constitution that he's going to use his position as president to attack his personal enemies that's reprehensible it's reprehensible when leticia james does it and can you not see that it says it's reprehensible when he does it are you that blind unbelievable unbelievable um okay the um my son says the context i'm getting that out of context

right oh okay no okay um in reference to is not locking up hillary um chef can 321 says trump wants to lock us up in freedom city that's exactly right but the key thing is is that all of his whining about how he's being attacked and everything, at the same time he wants to do it. All of his whining about the ballot corruption, and what is he doing? He's plotting on how he can do ballot corruption. And it's all about him. It's not about the Constitution. It's not about our liberties.

It's about his freedom cities. It's about his gun control by executive order. It's about his World Economic forum poisonous genetic code injections that he can't stop patting himself on the back for trump testimony wraps up in the new york civil case and again this is where the judge i don't know if the judge is that stupid maybe he is he doesn't look particularly intelligent but he says as trump is grandstanding on the stand, on the witness stand, he says, this is not a campaign event. Oh, yes, it is. It is a campaign event for Biden.

It's a campaign event for Trump. You don't realize? We're not doing debates anymore. We do these kind of show trials. It isn't about us. It's not about the Constitution. It's not about the economy. It's not about war and peace.

It's about Trump and his personal vendettas and Biden and his personal vendettas. That's what it's about. That's why I say, forget about the president. Forget about that. Focus on your share. Focus on your local elections. Focus on your life. Most importantly, focus on your relationship with God. Trump is not God. He is the idol of these MAGA people. He is not God. He is a corrupt New York politician in the mold of Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton. He hangs out with the Epsteins. You know, he takes the flights, all the rest. He is a corrupt person in every regard of his life, bragging about his infidelity to his wives. Of course, he's going to brag about his infidelity to the Constitution and everything else. We're going to take a break.

Do we have our guest? Okay, good. We're going to calm it down here a little bit, and we're going to talk politics about another country, and we're going to talk economics. Joining us when we come back is going to be Axel Kaiser. His book, which I bought last time I talked to him, I thought it was an excellent book, The Street Economist. And we're going to talk about what is happening.

Is Central and South America, particularly Argentina, are they going to be able to get out of the throes of a failed central bank of hyperinflation and of the socialists who are running that country? When we return, we will talk to him about the possibility of that. Stay with us. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.

Okay, and so my son says it was out of context, the comment that I made. So I wasn't yelling. I was yelling at uh people who will excuse what trump did but that was not my listener who was doing that so i don't know maybe this is a new listener i thought i didn't hadn't seen the comment the name before but yeah i think so uh again let's put my comments in context but joining us now is the author of this book uh the street economist subtitle is 15 economic lessons every citizen should know axel kaiser is the author who is joining us now and he has um he's an internationally known a writer and economist he is involved with um many different um uh in in

central and south america he's a chGerman lawyer. He's also a senior fellow at the Atlas Center for Latin America based in Miami, a visiting scholar at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Besides being a best-selling author and well-respected in terms of his ability to explain things, and that's the key thing, if you really understand something, you can simplify it for people. And that's what he does. He's got 15 simple examples. It's not a lot of economic analysis and not a lot of jargon. It's just an everyday street terms. And it's been very successful in terms of getting people to understand what is happening.

And when you combine an explanation of free market economics with a hyperinflation sitting in Argentina, that starts to move things. And so last time he was on, we talked about Javier Malai in Argentina, a surprise, a strong showing by him in the first election as a libertarian economist. He came in first place. And since we spoke, there's now been another election. And I wanted to get Axel Kaiser's comments about that because he knows Javier Malai, who's in Argentina. Again, Axel is in Chile. So thank you for joining us, sir.

Thank you very much for having me. Now, since we last talked, as I said, we've had this election and Javier Malai came in Chile. So thank you for joining us, sir. Thank you very much for having me. Now, since we last talked, as I said, we've had this election and Javier Malai came in second. I was surprised to see that the guy who is the socialist candidate, who is now the finance minister, edged him out in first place, but there's now going to be a runoff between the two of them. Tell us a little bit about that and how you see this. Why did that happen? Well, actually, you know, you have a problem in Argentina that it's called Peronism. Peronism, it's a religion. It was developed by Juan Domingo Perón, a general who ruled in the country for

many years. And he was a fascist basically a collectivist a statist not a communist but he didn't believe in free markets he didn't believe in economic freedom he believed in this sort of corporate arrangements and that the state had to basically control people's lives and the economic system and give everyone benefits and social rights and things like that and this became over the decades in Argentina sort of uh you know religion in the country it's like if you would say about maybe we would talk about uh Saudi Arabia or any of these Muslim countries and and and you could not imagine them without being Muslims you know what I mean? And so, to some extent, Peronism became part of Argentina's identity, and it's the mythology that gives Argentinians a large part of the

population in Argentina a sense of belonging and also meaning and all of that. It's a very... Very connected to Evita Peron and We Got It in America, you know, the Broadway show Evita and all this other kind of stuff. And so they attach a personality to it and people get attached to that person, like a celebrity. You know, you got a celebrity politician

that everybody wants to follow. And so that's a big part of it as well, isn't it? Yeah, but it's even more than a celebrity because Evita peron you have the culture personality until today it became like um let's let's think this in religious terms uh it's like um you know it's like having saints in the Catholic religion. Or they go to Maria Magdalena, for instance. So she's a patron saint of fascism. Yeah.

It has a religious component. So it's not like, oh, we admire Taylor Swift or whoever it is, and then when she's dead, no one cares. This goes way beyond that. They managed to create a very strong as i said mythology and um with uh with religious favor so the people who follow this are fanatics this is one element that i think we usually tend to underestimate the importance of ideas culture the mentality no and now we are seeing this war between namaz and israel you can have a new grasp on the importance of ideology or fundamentalism and ideas so in argentina you have this and the

other problem is that they massa and the baron is they control the government so they can mobilize lots of resources in order to win the election to you know bribe people to um to tell them that if mila wins they are not going to receive the benefits anymore this is actually what they did if you went to to the train stations and the bus stations in argentina um previous to the uh before the first round uh you saw uh science that were put up by the government by Massa showing people how much the price of the train ticket and the and the bus ticket uh would increase in case Millet was Millet was uh elected or as compared to the price of the of the uh transportation tickets if Massa was elected and

so mele was like 10 times 10 times high 10 times higher and so they scared people into voting against mele by telling them that all these subsidies were going to go away and then they would have to pay much more for transportation which in our country like Argentina without uh you know 150 inflation almost and a ruined economy, it makes a huge difference for people who have to take the train every day to go for work. And with that kind of inflation, when I reported on it, I said, again, Massa, the guy who is his opponent, the pernista, is a finance minister.

And so he did a big tax cut, and then he gave some new entitlement programs or an increase in entitlement programs as well, didn't he? I mean, essentially throwing gasoline on the dumpster fire, right? Didn't he do that as well besides the propaganda stuff? Well, yeah, of course. They lowered taxes and also they, you know, give a lot of money away so people can, you know, with both of them. This is a classical existentialist policy and mentality that we have seen in Latin America, but especially in Argentina for over a century, I would say even. And so there is nothing new there.

Now it's very hard for Millet to win, but it's not impossible. I think he has a good chance of winning. And next Sunday, I think it's the election. And yeah, the 17th, November. And the person who came in in third place, who will be moved out, that was a conservative person. Is that correct?

Yes. So you expect that he'll inherit. In this three-way race, that conservative vote was being split between Malay and this other person who's now eliminated. Is that correct? Yeah, Patricia Woolrich came in third place, and she already has endorsed Millay, and also Macri has endorsed Millay. and vote for Millet because the ability of politicians to mobilize the people that supported them has decreased over time. So it used to be the case that one politician would say,

okay, I support this guy and many people will follow him, but that's not the case anymore. But a percentage of them will go for Mill late so that that's why he still has a has a chance and he he said they're going to be starting from a you know a clean slate because there were lots of uh attacks and aggressions between the two of them during the campaign and now they are together and trying to to win the presidency because if they don't do it then you will have the same cronies and criminals basically there are a bunch of criminals the people who are running argentina now uh massa even had ties to the to narco cartels and things like that and so um they don't have a chance in my opinion i mean if argentinians really vote again for burnished in a

country where the finance minister has the people living with 140 inflation with uh fifth almost 50 under the poverty line and where the country is broke and no investments are available and so on and so forth, then you can only explain this in terms of ideology and more even so than in terms of, you know, mobilizing resources by the government so that people will vote for you, which is something they will do anyways. I think that's not enough because people are really suffering now. It's not like they have a lot to lose if they if they vote for me late let me ask you this because when uh in the comments of the uh after the election mainstream media here in the united states was uh going back and looking at comments from people who voted one way or the other and um and i don't know if it was just the way that they selected it. If it was a truly representative, you've got to try to always try to see through

the, uh, the, the smoke in the mirrors that the mainstream media is using, but what they were doing, at least in terms of what they were talking about, they said, you know, most of the older people were supporting, um, Masa, I think is his name, uh, the Peronista and, yeah. And, and, uh, and it was mostly young people who were saying, we got to try something different. This just isn't working. We were supporting Javier Malai. Is that kind of similar to what you see there? A generational gap where people that are older maybe are buying into managed to create a structural change in public opinion in Argentina. That means that younger generations who vote for him, they are not Peronists anymore.

I mean, they are lost to the Peronists. And so that is um a great achievement i think it's unbelievable what has been going on there because this is like converting muslims into christians you know it's like something something yeah it's it's it's huge so even if he doesn't win the presidency i think that is part of his uh success and no one can deny that but of course in the older generations um the parents mythology is it's much more prevalent and and they tend to embrace it um you know stronger in a stronger way than the younger generations who are also very much worried that they will have no opportunities in this country and actually

many young people are living argentina um to other places they are going to states or europe many of them have european passports you know and so uh i happened to to um i had a girlfriend for a long time who was from argentina and all of her family had already left and many of her friends we are talking about uh 20 25 year old people 30 year old people because they they think there is no hope in this country and and the human capital is the first one to leave and so they all support me late all of them the older guys uh tend to live a lot from government assistance you know the pensions and things like that and they are still in this mindset they have still have this mindset of golden has to take care of us and give us everything and feminism is good and and massa is the guy but they're also um in the you know generations, let's say the baby boomers, there are many who vote for Millet because they just are anti-establishment.

They don't want the same people to be in power anymore because the corruption scandals and all that has been completely insane in Argentina over the last years and decades and so they would vote for me just to get rid of them and not that they are really really uh classical liberals or people who uh endorse the free market but uh i think they are um different type of person they could vote back for a fairness that they consider honest in a couple of years from now. So I think if Millet, I mean, if it was only with people under 30, Millet would have won in the first round. I mean, the election took place between people know people above 18 under 30 they would have won

in the first round uh but that tells you something about the future of the country so i think i'm optimistic in that sense i agree yeah in the medium term very hard yeah it is uh yeah people who just want to get rid of the corruption that has been so ingrained there. But I have a comment from a listener, ALC28, says, pay close attention to the psychological aspect behind the dependent relationship that people have with their government. Many people are afraid of freedom, and they really are. They'd rather have the free stuff than freedom. They will give up their freedom. They think that they can purchase their security and their comfort by

giving up their freedom. And of course, Benjamin Franklin said, no, it's not going to work. Never worked. Uh, but that is the calculation that they're doing with that. So I think that may be it, but you know, it's interesting, uh, Axel, uh, the New York times saw this and said, well, you know, we think that, uh, uh, Javier Malaise, um, uh, again, to the younger voters who are not attached to the Peronista personas, and they see that it's not working. As you pointed out, they're even leaving the country to try to find economic opportunity that is not there. And so the New York Times says, yeah, but, you know, he might have a problem because there might be these Taylor Swift fans who are going to attack him. And they've organized a group called Swifties Against Freedom Advances. And because he's called his, isn't that funny?

They don't see the irony of that, I guess, because Freedom Advances is Malay's party. So they're arraigning themselves against Freedom Advancing. Pretty much self-owned,'t they right yeah but uh let's talk a little bit about that because i had an article uh obama has come back and has now commented on uh you know his his disdain that he has for the free market because he's kind of uh our peronistas part of that group and And this headline from Washington Examiner says, Obama warns about the dangers of market-based systems being compatible with slavery. And I'll just read you this, two sentences that he had here.

He says, just because an economic system generated wealth and innovation doesn't mean that it guarantees a good society. He said, market-based systems have been compatible with slavery, caste systems, colonization, war, fraud, autocracy, and the poisoning of our natural environment. It's like, wow, this guy really does hate free markets. He's not even talking about capitalism, which some people might attribute to crony capitalism. He's talking about the free market and your ability to have a choice there. It's all about colonization and exploitation and fraud and autocracy. But at the very beginning

of it, he says, just because an economic system develops wealth and innovation, well, that's what an economic system is supposed to do, isn't it? You know, Obama makes a fundamental mistake there because he's ignorant in economics. I wish he could read my book as critical yes yes learn something but the fundamental mistake that he makes and many people on the left uh make is uh you know to confuse um the free market and something that is uh you know something that exists like free market institutions with things that have existed all over you know throughout human history that's right for instance i mean slavery for example yeah the roman empire had slavery they didn't have free markets exactly and they didn't have a free market so the right question would be for obama to ask where are the places where my ideals let's assume it's

democracy and human rights and you know prosperity and social mobility where where are those places that um or what what you know characteristic do those places have where you find respect for human rights and you have prosperity and social inclusion and things like that and the and the thing that you will find is that all of these places with no exception have a market economy there is zero exception to this to this rule and now if you go to places where you have zero market economy or almost no market economy you will find none of these things that obama claims to value so so the real question is what would happen in the absence of the free market and not if you have you know paradise because you have a free market

and in the absence of a free market, you wouldn't have prosperity, inclusion, social mobility, you wouldn't have respect for human rights, and so on and so forth. And when you have a free market, it's a necessary condition for having a free society that is inclusive. It's not a sufficient condition, but it's a necessary condition. And this is what Obama doesn't understand. And that's why he doesn't value the free market because yes you could have spaces of free market where you have slave trade for instance but that doesn't mean that you have

the slave trade because you have free markets you would have you would have the slave trade regardless of the type of economic arrangement that you have in that society and that's what what happened throughout human history yeah so when we can look at places like communist china and we can see that we've got autocracy we've got fraud we've got corruption exactly uh we have the poisoning of the natural environment that they have in china we said that we have all that stuff because of an authoritarian centrally controlled and planned economy. That is inherent in that system that you have all those things. And that's also another point.

It's the same mistake that Pope Francis makes. If you take a look at the countries that respect the environment the most, it's all capitalist, free market economies, countries. It's not the socialist countries. It's not underdeveloped countries uh it's not Haiti or you know some country in in Africa or even the former Soviet Union it's not what happens I mean the Soviet Union was a you know uh an environmental disaster yes it's horrible and people don't know a lot about this but it was much worse than any Western capitalist country that you could see. And because we have a free market economy, because we have innovation, we can not only provide food and shelter for everyone,

but we can improve the technologies so that we can become cleaner and cleaner in the way we produce stuff. And this is what has been going on actually over the last decade if you take a look at the amount of co2 for instance produced per dollar gdp of output you can see that it has dramatically declined everywhere in the us and even in china but if you take a look at the soil pollution and and water pollution and things like that, air pollution. There's a famous study that was made decades ago, years ago. I don't remember exactly the date, but it showed that when you surpass $15,000 in per capita income around that benchmark, then all these pollutants start to decrease.

And so water starts becoming cleaner, air starts getting cleaner, and so on and so forth. So economic development, thanks to free market economies, make the world cleaner in the end. Of course, you can always say, well, you know, if we went back to the Stone Age, we wouldn't have any poisoning of the air and things like that, which is also not entirely true true because back then we had some volcanic eruptions that were much worse than anything we have ever seen so uh but uh that's not reasonable to argue yeah you know and that's the problem with the extinctionists nowadays they they say oh humans are a plague we have to more or less everyone has to die not us but everyone else has to die so that the earth you know will be clean and and and and pure again which is uh an anti-humanist and and and genocidal way of thinking i'm not saying obama thinks like that but uh he's very confused when it comes to

um to the free market it's like saying well democracy is also compatible with corruption it's also compatible with human rights violations it's also compatible with you know um all sorts of uh evil stuff but that doesn't mean that it is because you have democracy that you have that it's when you have democracy and liberal democracy especially that respects fundamental rights where you have less of these sort of evils in general, as a general rule. You have exceptions, of course. And so he wouldn't say that if he was speaking about democracy. But because he hates the free market or because he doesn't like it,

he just cannot think clearly about it. That's right. Yeah. Cause and effect. What actually caused it or is it something that was there there before and after again the book is the street economist axel kaiser 15 economic lessons every citizen should know and um obama should know these too but he doesn't uh so you know and you gotta say look this uh centrally controlled uh uh economies work really well for people like uh xi and china and obama you know he's he's done really well for people like Xi and China and Obama. You know, he's done really well in terms of trying to plan economies and other people's lives and take away their choices.

But talk a little bit about one of the lessons that you've got in there. You say only two ways to make a living, from your own work or from somebody else's work. And I guess you would say that Obama and the Peronistas are making their living from somebody else's work and i guess you would say that uh obama and the peronistas are making they're living from somebody else's work right so yeah you know this is a very fundamental lesson and a very deep thing if you really think about this um when we were in paradise and all you forms of utopianism um you know offer a place where you will not have to work or you will not have to put so much effort in order to, you know, provide for your life

and your family's life. And so socialists and collectivists and people like Obama tend to believe that there's a moral value when you don't have to really put your own effort into achieving something like providing for yourself they think it's the responsibility of the community of society to make sure that everyone has enough to uh survive and and when they do this they basically promote policies that destroy incentives so that people

can create wealth and they create incentives and you see this in argentina of course and also in the us uh to a different extent that people will live at the expense of someone else because as i say in the book you have only two ways of supporting your life you can work for yourself and provide for yourself or you can live out of someone else someone else pays your bills basically that's what what we do as parents we pay our kids bills why because they are children they cannot provide for themselves it's it's a natural order of things right but when you are an adult and you are not providing for unless you are real and you have some sort of a different problem and you are not providing for yourself, someone else has to provide for yourself. And this is the promise that is offered by the left

worldwide, that you will not have to worry because someone else has your back. They will pay for your bills. It's of course not the politicians who promise this that take their money from their pockets in order to pay for them it's through the tax system your neighbor or someone who is rich or has a better situation than you and and you will take away from him and will give it to you because to some extent they they they feel that it is unfair that some people have more than others and they feel it is also unfair to have to work for making a living it's a fundamental problem that you have with this mindset which is the utopianism behind it it's the idea that life is unfair because you have to work in order to make a living. And if we, if we just were in the perfect place in paradise,

again, we wouldn't have to work. And they are trying to offer that. They're trying to tell people, you know, don't worry. This time is not God who is going to provide for everything in paradise. This time is the state is the government.

It's us in charge of the government. It's God vermin. It's charge of the government it's godverment it's godverment it's like i call them uh and and we had this in spades didn't we with the lockdowns and i don't know what they did in uh in south america but you know we had the lockdowns and then they gave people stimulus checks don't work stay home i'll give you this money and that was training for universal basic income uh is that something that's being pushed by? I'm sure it is. It's a globalist agenda. I'm sure it's being pushed in South America,

the universal basic income. We've even got former economists like Charles Murray that I really respected when he talked about how a welfare state had actually harmed the people it was supposed to help and made them dependent on the state. And now he's pushing universal basic income. It's truly amazing to see how this is being pushed. But it also, I think it's amazing, Axel, how quickly people caught on to that and how quickly

they became dependent on it, saw that as an entitlement. And I shouldn't have to go to work. I want to stay home and continue to collect my check and so forth and stimulus check, not even working from home with a Zoom. But I want to stay home and get that stimulus check check and so forth and stimulus check not even you know working from home with a zoom but i i want to stay home and get that stimulus check worked really well yeah that is a big uh trend nowadays to to argue for ubi especially because um of all the technological innovation that is coming and then the argument that it will replace jobs and destroy jobs and machines are going to do everything in the end actually elon musk recently had an interview i don't know if you saw this with the

prime minister of the uk and uh he said that he believed that all jobs were going to be destroyed by ai all of them all of them no exception basically and that we wouldn't have a ubi but we would have a universal high income or something like that, he called it, because we would have so much resources, so much money in the end, that we would be able to provide everything we wanted for everyone and no one would have to work unless you wanted to.

Well, this sounds like a point in time where you don't have the economic problem anymore which is how to provide you know and to get the resources but I I don't like the UBI because they are first of all they are arguing for the UBI on top of all the welfare measures that we already have it's not like we are going to shut down the welfare state and we are going to give a UBI to uh to people who who cannot you know uh reach to a certain reach a certain amount of money so that they can support themselves it's it's it's apart from everything the government is already doing they want to introduce the UBI which I think is horrible and and even if you got

rid of all the welfare of the welfare state and and you had a very small government which would be much better for everyone the problem with the ubi is what you just said you you make people dependent on these handouts and this have no has not only of course you solve the economic problem of the resources that you need for eating and shelter and all that but you have have another element that you have to take into account. People need to find meaning in life and they need to feel useful members of society. And there is no better way to achieve that than through work. And so if you have people depending on government and money that is being just given to them, their sense of dignity, of self-worth is going to dramatically plummet. And we have seen this in welfare states all over the world. Even in countries like Sweden or Denmark, you have that problem.

And then you will have a social crisis and, uh, you know, probably this disenfranchised people that will go on streets burning cars. Like you see in Europe, migrants that you see destroying things in Europe are on welfare. All of them. Yes. Most of them are young men who are not even working. And they don't have any direction. You know, I, I, when I looked at asymmetric warfare centers here in the U.S. and you had these military people who were analyzing what was happening in these other countries, they said, you know, the thing that's motivating them is not Islam or any kind of radical religion. What motivates them? These are typically, the profile is typically somebody who's in their 30s. They're well educated. They might have been an engineer or something like that but now they see that they have no control over their future because you know we've come

in and bombed their country and we're occupying it so they see that they have no control over the future that helplessness radicalizes them turns them into terrorists then they turn to religion but they're radicalized by having absolutely no control or purpose in their life that's been taken away from them and so when you look at the people that are being brought in with the open borders into Europe and into the United States, we know that they're bringing them in. It's going to develop into a sense of hopelessness and frustration. They want them to be radicalized in that. But, you know, when we look at what the, we look at what the technocrats are doing. George Gilder said these Silicon Valley people, he called them neo-Marxist, excellent.

He said the reason he called them neo-Marxist, he said they've got a fundamental conceit like Karl Marx that, who said we have with the industrial revolution, we've got, we can make more physical goods than we ever need. And now we just have to figure out how we're going to distribute those, and we'll let the government do it. And so George Gilders said, that's what the Silicon Valley people are saying. They say, we've got all this technology, we've got genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotech. All we have to do is just figure out, we have infinite physical goods, we just need to put it out there.

It sounds like that's what Elon Musk is telling Rishi Sunak. What do you think about that does that sound like marxism to you well you know the problem with marxism promise something like having a utopia where no one will have to uh where they will really freedom from want right exactly that's what with their technology yeah yeah and that machines would do everything and would create all the prosperity for us that this is a mindset right now in March utopia uh it would be the communist society that would create all of this wealth uh he didn't really detail how this was going to happen of course because of the hand waving going on there yeah

he was selling the dream you know and and of course I mean I have the thesis that Marks knew uh very well that he wanted to create dictatorships and destroy the existing order and and and send you know millions of people to their death and and and the way that he had to the way he he sell this was by saying at some point we are going to be so happy and no one will uh will need to to work much more than he that he will uh you know um you know have to have to in order to provide for himself and his family and we will be so wealthy everyone will have so much from everything. So that part of the story is similar to what Marx envisioned. Now, I think there are other utopias, not only Marxism, that had promised something like this.

This is why I, in my view, the idea of paradise is so powerful because almost all sorts of utopias, not all of them, but offered something like a paradise on earth where people will live in security and you will not have this existential fear that you will not be able to find food or mean resources to provide for yourself and your your family and and so i think in silicon valley right now you are seeing this form of utopia only there are better reasons now to believe that this could happen actually because if it is really true that general artificial intelligence can um surpass human beings in everything we do and produce limitless resources, more or less, then yes, at some point you will have superabundance and the economic problem will be over.

I don't think this is going to happen, but if it's true. Yeah, you know, it's interesting when we had Michael Bloomberg running for president in the 2020 cycle briefly, he made a statement that a lot of people got very angry with him because he denigrated farmers' contributions. Said, ah, they're stupid. Anybody can do that job. People said, no, it's a complicated job. You've got a lot of different things that you've got to manage.

You're an entrepreneur. You're taking risks. You've got to be able to fix equipment, all this kind of stuff. But what he was saying in the context, Axel, was he was saying, well, you know, we had the agrarian revolution, a culture, and we replaced it with an industrial culture, an industrial society. And he said, so, you know, those people are working on the farm. They weren't worked in the factory, but he goes, now those of us who are smart can replace all of them. And we're working on how we take everybody's jobs. And he said, we have to figure out how we're going to keep them after we take their jobs, how we keep them from coming after us with guillotines.

That was what he said. And so that's exactly the way I see this UBI. You know, these people sell us these utopias that you're talking about. And now we're going to have everything that's going to be handed to us on a silver platter. You know, artificial intelligence is going to do this, says the world's richest man. And then he's just going to share that wealth with you. And, um, and, and yet the reality is, is that it's really more of a pacification. And it kind of reminds me of, um, what HG Wells did with the time machine.

You know, he goes forward in the future and he sees little pink creatures that they have everything provided for them. It seems like, and they call them the Eloy. And then at night, uh, the Morlocks come out from underneath the ground and harvest which ones are those they want to eat yeah you know and that's really what i think is is in the mindset of these uh these billionaire technocrats who are telling us about this utopia that's on its way i think they're setting us up to be eloi well you know you know, I think in the case of Elon Musk, maybe he's even worried about this.

He didn't set this when he was speaking with Sunak, but he doesn't seem to be like one of these hardcore ideologues in that sense. And he's very worried about artificial intelligence going wrong and, you know, maybe becoming a threat to humanity. But he believes strongly that we will come to a point where the machines and artificial intelligence can provide for everything. So you will have your personal trainer will be some sort of robot and your psychologist will be some AI that knows you better than yourself and things like that. But we have to think about what it means to be human because now we are entering an age

where this is going to be the defining um on the most challenging question and if we get it wrong i think we will we are heading to collapse and to widespread chaos in the world even if we have ai producing or because we have ai producing all of this free stuff so yes there is some some element of that what you are saying is like, okay, we are the rich guys. We are going to give you the cramps of everything we are producing so that you are not coming after us and creating a revolution. But you could have this revolution anyways. Because if you are on UBI and you used to work as a lawyer

or you used to work as whatever lawyer or you used to work as whatever white blue collar works and you are in ubi and you have the other very smart people who are running the show you will have a caste system yes basically yes yes and and that is very uh i would say uh incompatible with with human nature and the way we humans work uh as us you know i agree and i think that caste system i think that caste system is a technocracy you know and that's exactly and so and so we will feel like we are not even the slaves because there was something that you could say at least if if you were a slave, you were forced to work for someone. And you could always think, I mean, I could be free someday or I could, you know, or this is an abuse that is being committed against me. But if you are a UBI, you don't even have that.

It's like you are just some sort of a dependent, like an infant. And these very bright people are feeding you and are giving you stuff so that, you know, you are just remaining peaceful and not bothering them too much. That's right. Yeah. And they've been very obvious about the fact that's what they want to do. Yuval Harari says, yeah, the future doesn't need you. We just need to find a way that we can pacify you maybe we can do it with entertainment until you guys just kind of breed yourself out of existence or whatever or we find some way to quietly kill you i mean it's

very sinister when you look at it the big design that they have and that's why you know when you look at uh that's that's what i like about your book. You talk about real, tangible issues and how economics is at the center of what we do in terms of helping us, giving us a mission, part of our humanity, how entrepreneurs are social benefactors and not just doing it for their own good, but society in general benefits from that.

You take away all that. you take away the entrepreneurship, you take away the pride of, of, uh, being able to create something, uh, that's really destroying us at our core of humanity. Isn't it? Exactly. Like, like let's go and tell, and tell, you know, painters and artists and people who work, uh, agricultures who really love what they do, or at least they feel like, like they are needed, uh, you know, because otherwise society doesn't work and we all do things

that other people value. That's why we get some income. And, and now you will tell them we don't need you. Like you are completely, uh, not only replaceable, but your existence doesn't matter to anyone yes in terms of collaboration and in terms of you know this is a very hard appeal to swallow i don't believe that it's going to work i don't believe this is going to end well if ai starts producing everything and you know now psychologists will have a job no doctor will have a job because ai will do everything no architect no nothing what we're gonna do all day watch watch movies

with fake actors that are being played by ai i mean what are we gonna do that's done by ai and recycling other people that have been around there it is crazy and yet you know this is kind of again what what is the fatal conceit of all these utopian societies is that somebody that's designing the society knows how to run everything. That they've somehow got godlike intelligence and they know how to run it. And so now what they've done is they've moved this away to try to make this feasible to people since they've run that into the ground. But we'll create artificial intelligence that has godlike intelligence. And it will tell you what to do. It is, there's a lot.

Yes. I tell you what, you know, my spidey senses are going off, you know, when I hear this kind of stuff happening all the time. Yeah, more than utopia, we are going to get dystopia. We are going to have, you know, more along the lines of Aldous Huxley, Brave New World. We will have like a totalitarian technocratic society where, you know, we're going to be just like cocks in the machine and then they're going to tell us, not even that,

because we will not even be part of the machine. Maybe we will feed the machine like in Matrix, you know. Yeah, exactly. So that's all what's going to be left for us i mean it's very hard to really foresee what's going to happen but i could not imagine uh having you know hundreds of millions of people unemployed with nothing to do at being peaceful and just happy you know meditating the whole day this is not going to happen i agree yeah jason barker let me give you this comment from one of our

listeners. And of course he's also got a broadcast. He says, uh, um, nights of the storm, as well as the Fox whole report, Jason Barker says the new cast system they want is about removing hope. There is no mechanism to get out. And that's why the 15 minute cities and the death of private transportation. Uh, do you agree with that? To me, that sounds spot on. I think that's exactly. I agree with that. If you lose hope, you lose everything. And you have hope where

you yourselves are not. You cannot envision a way in which you can somehow somehow fulfill a potential that you have. And that potential that you can fulfill or develop and needs from others and needs the the the the the k i mean you have to be able to make the case that you are useful to others and that other people will value you for what you are capable of offering as a human being in different in different aspects of life and yes of course people can tell you but you will still be able to love to have children and your family this is important of course that's all very important i hope that ai doesn't replace that replace that because now you will have like ai girlfriends that will draw books like all in

in these movies and they look like like humans and they are pretty and you know so even that it's going to change uh if this continues to develop in that direction but i think i think we will live in a hopeless society and when you have that you have the perfect um you know ferment for a social explosion and a revolution that's right because someone will come and say enough and they will try offer you and offer you uh some sort of hope and if you take a look at the nazis it's exactly what Hitler did with the with the German people that were completely despair because they I mean desperation because they were you know hyperinflation depression and they had no hope then you had

this guy you had the same thing in the Russian Revolution and the same thing in the French Revolution the great the three great revolutions we've had and genocidal revolutions we thing in the French Revolution, the three great revolutions we've had, and genocidal revolutions we had in modern times. Why wouldn't that be the case now in an age of superabundance? It could be the case. Yes. Of course. Yes. It could happen.

Yes, yes. Because, again, you know, life is more than just about what we own. And, uh, but these are existential questions really that you give very simple answers to in terms of, uh, and I say existential issues because, uh, this is the, these are,

are, it's a thin book. It's easy to read. And it is, um, a way for you to try to explain to people who have been deceived into what this is about, why these utopian systems, why these centrally controlled systems really don't work.

And why it's doomed to failure, why it is doomed to despair. And so this is a great way, this book, you do a great job, Axel, of distilling these arguments, giving real world examples that people, if you look at this, you can explain it to your children, you can explain it to your friends if they are hearing this siren song of free stuff forever, and they're going to keep us safe if we just surrender everything to them. Thank you so much for joining us, and very interesting. We'll be watching again. You said the Argentina election is, what about um two weeks away or so

yeah it's um 17 november 17th so i think 10 days next week yeah it's almost yeah okay on the weekend okay we'll be looking and keeping our fingers crossed that things will work out better for the people in argentina that they can take a step back towards reality and away from hyper inflation and authoritarian socialist policies. Thank you for all the work that you do. And thank you for this excellent book, The Street Economist by Axel Kaiser. Thank you very much, Axel.

Appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks a lot. All right, folks, we're going to be coming right back. Stay with us. We're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about what's happening with

banks still uh happening in the united states we're still having some problems with the processing stuff as well as some updates on the pharmaceutical industry and its machinations about controlling us we'll be right back Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go. All right, and again, I can't apologize enough.

I lost my temper with a caller who was putting out a hypothetical about Trump, so I apologize. My son is getting up his name so I can apologize directly. Apologize about that. Sorry. Northern Cardinal said our new immigrants don't

have to work or they lose their welcome benefits uh sergey drogan drogan thank you very much for the tip i appreciate that very much and um and i apologize to uh jefferson uh three three five five i'd misconstrued your comment i apologize for that it's easy to get things out of context but um what i said still applies in general but not to you i wasn't talking to you i was talking to the people following trump so i get it that you're not following that let's take a look at what is happening with the bank deposits again um reported this on friday some of the biggest banks bank of america wells fargo jp morgan, and ADP that handles paycheck

processing. And a lot of people are not being able to see their direct deposits were not happening and other deposits were not happening. And they said, well, it's a temporary thing, but we got to fix now. Well, it still continued into yesterday. I thought that it was over, but the reports are that it is still going on. According to CBS News, customers, major U.S. banks, including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, still complaining about delays with their direct deposits on Monday, following a glitch with processing payments that

began on Friday. The Federal Reserve on Friday said the problem wasn't related to a cybersecurity issue. It wasn't hacked, they said. And they said that it had been resolved. Can we believe either of those? It is possible that it was hacked. It's also possible that it was some kind of an inside job. You know, many times these cybersecurity things really are an inside job. Somebody wants to get even with a company or something like that. It could also be that these banks who are insiders as part of the federal reserve system you know maybe this whole problem with this corporation called the clearing house is the payments company that operates the only private sector automated clearing house

system in the united states that's ach and so it's the only private one it's the only competitor to the federal reserve it's a competitor to their fed now system which is the precursor to their fed coin the cbdc uh so again you know i'm just a coincidence i'm sure clearinghouse said that some ach payment instructions were sent to banks on November 2nd with masked customer names and account numbers due to a processing error. Those payments were delayed. Many of the delayed payments have already been posted. They said, we'll continue working with the financial institutions to ensure the remaining transactions get through.

And JPMorgan Chase has said that they will refund any overdraft fees that happened because, you know, people were expecting the payments to be made and it was their fault. They weren't made. And so maybe you've got a, uh, a direct payment that you make, uh, expecting that to be there. So they're going to take care of any overdraft fees. Um, one person though, on Monday morning said, uh, to bank of America on X on Twitter, day four, Bank of America, still no direct deposit, no update or potential resolution, or at the very least, what's being done to resolve this issue.

No transparency, no assistance, no communication from you at all. Nothing. Wow. This is so bizarre, which reminds me of something that Catherine Austin Fitz was saying in terms of looking at what is happening and where this is all leading to. Again, she has the Solari Report, and she was talking recently about changes that are coming to the banking system, how they threaten our freedom, and what can we do to prevent them.

She was Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during the Reagan administration. She understands this at a very fundamental level. She also knows a lot of the people who are big players in this. This past summer, after Chase debanked Mercola, along with two of his executives and his families, she put out a four-part video series on banking at chd.tv, where she's got a weekly show called The Financial Rebellion. And she co-hosts that with the general counsel of the Solari Report. And in that, she said, how to develop a successful relationship.

I mean, do you really think that, you know, when JP Morgan says, well, we pride ourselves on the fact that we have a personal relationship with our 80 million customers and our 6 million businesses that we have out there, do you believe that for a moment? There's absolutely no way that they can have a personal relationship of any sort with that many people. And so she says, how to develop a successful relationship with a great bank. She says, we're talking about a significant relationship here.

It's very important that your banker knows you and you know your banker. You need a relationship where you can pick up a phone and call if there's a problem and you can get things handled. You're not going to get that at the big banks. And of course, that's one of the reasons why they want to drive small and medium-sized banks out of business. And, you know, why we should be very concerned about that. This consolidation, as we see in every one of the industries, is a very negative thing in terms of our freedom, but also in terms of even the services that we get. She says, so important that your basic transactions run on a platform you can trust.

One of my favorite quotes is from a Swiss doctor who said, the currency of the future will be relationships of trust. And this extends beyond the bank. This is why I wanted to talk about this. This extends beyond your banking relationships. Now, there are much more important relationships where there's trust. Your relationship with your spouse, your relationship with your neighbors, your local community, your church, all these different things. These are the things that are going to be the currency of the future. You know, we talk about how they want to take all that away from us with CBDC, and I mention that all the time.

And, you know, if you go to davidknight..Gold, it'll take you to Tony Ardaban. I really do believe that we need to try to put some things away and some real stuff that is not tied to the currency because we look at what happens when there's massive inflation like there is in Argentina. But, you know, it's important to have that as a separate thing. But it's not the end. It's simply a means to an end, you know? And, and, uh, so, you know, having your money not tied up in a bank, not tied up in a fiat currency, that's an important thing, but it is, that's still just a means to an end. You know, money does not, uh, uh, give us meaning in life. It's going to be those relationships.

And the currency of the future will be the relationship of trust. Who do you trust? And who is it that you know? And the people around you. That's the important thing about all this. The rest of this stuff is just means to an end. And so she talks about this in terms of the growing role of artificial intelligence. She said, AI is a component piece of a system that is very successful at brainwashing, at propaganda, and at mind control.

And when you combine it with entertainment and subliminal programming and software that creates addictions, you create this phenomenal infrastructure of things that really draw people in. Part of AI's power is access to tremendous amounts of data about what we're thinking, what we're doing, what we want. So it's the surveillance component. It's the next level.

As I pointed out, the progression from being able to tell people propaganda with newspapers and then make it more effective and more visceral as you added audio and then you added audio and video. But then in the 21st century, what they focused on, and again, plotted this out in the middle of the 20th century when they didn't have the technology to implement it, but they got that technology in the 90s to be able to push out on social media and on the internet their narrative and then to measure our response to it.

And so if you look at this as a continuum, you see that artificial intelligence is now taking this to a weaponized extreme of being able to not only throw out their narrative in a very propagandizing way, very effective propaganda, but also to actively measure our response to it in a way that we've never seen before. That's what's new about artificial intelligence. That's what's new about artificial intelligence. That's what's threatening about artificial intelligence.

And that's why Biden has put out his executive order to take control of this just as he did with CBDC. And don't think that Trump wouldn't do the same thing. I mean, it was the Trump administration with Jared Kushner and Steve Mnuchin, who were the first ones to push CBDC in the White House. Again, because it was their authoritarian in their nature. They don't support the Constitution and individual rights. And when the technology comes along for them to do something with that, they'll grab for it. So the projections for crypto. The common understanding is that Nakamoto is the ultimate altruist and abandoned his 1 million bitcoins for the benefit of humanity.

But Nick Carter, a well-known figure in the cryptocurrency community, says he doesn't buy that story. He's convinced that it's actually the U.S. National Security Agency, NSA, responsible for creating Bitcoin. He believes it was written by NSA cryptographers as a monetary bioweapon. Catherine Austin Fitz believes the same thing. And that's my concern about it. She says, you know,

what happens to Bitcoin and other crypto after hundreds of hours of looking at the custodian issue? She said, depends on how they roll out the complete control. As long as they have the ability

to assert complete control and shut crypto down and marginalize it, it's easy for the globalists to assert control. Until then, they can continue to pull the money out of precious metals and of real and hard assets by encouraging the people, the public, to go to crypto. He said, I have no problem with crypto in general if it worked, but you got to be careful how these people are going to use this. That's why I like to say that money is what you hold. And if you want to know how to get something that you can hold, davidknight.gold. Thank you so much for joining us today. Have a good day. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us.

Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for listening.

Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The David Knight Show dot com. If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com.