The David Knight Show - 8Jun23 Civilization is Burning: Depopulation, Debauchery — and the Ruins of Sodom

Episode Date: June 8, 2023

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODES Whatever started the Canadian fires, the change from a conservation/steward management to a quasi-religious obsession to do NO management has laid the groundwork (literally) for gasoline on the fire — and Gov Hochul in NY is ready with a MILLION masks from the stockpiles (2:19)John Kerry gives us yet another reminder that New World Order is not simply about theft — but depopulation, destruction of humanity (8:03)Remember Deagle? Are we on track with the massive depopulation they predicted in 2015 would happen by 2025? (11:02)Listener from Australia comments on what they've done to forestry policy there as well (24:07) HG Wells, Julian Huxley, and Musk's grandfather — roots of technocracy and transhumanism (32:07)A look at massive CORRUPTION throughout the USA from state to federal levels (42:12)The intentional martyrdom of Trump by the left as the FBI beclowns itself covering up for Trump and GOP responds with nothing but show hearings (57:36) Chris Christie enters the race focusing on Jared & Ivanka's "breathtaking grift" with the Saudi's. But Christie has more baggage than Sam Brinton as he wound up on "the wrong side of history" pushing face masks (1:06:40)Pence joins the presidential circus talking about loyalty to the Constitution. He NEVER had a problem with what Trump did to the Constitution throughout 2020 until Trump came for him (1:16:06)RFKj goes to the border (at 2am?) and reports the "humanitarian crisis". What is his solution?(1:21:50)Instagram not only allowed pedophile content and groups, it PUSHED CONTENT (1:39:56)"Miss" San Francisco is a man who will go on to compete in the Miss USA pageant (1:49:02)Sodom Isn't a Fairy Tale WATCH this footage of Sodom & Gomorrah today. An ancient archaeological warning that stands to this day (1:54:15)King James Bible banned in some Utah schools over claims of vulgarity and violence (1:55:12)INTERVIEW Challenging Content-Based Restrictions on Free Speech Roger Gyron, Senior Counsel, First Liberty Institute firstliberty.org After Liberty Institute's recent win at the Supreme Court defending Coach Joseph Kennedy's right to pray silently on the 50 yard line after the game (he was fired for doing so), Mr. Byron joins to talk about a new challenge to Colorado's law that imposes severe, content-based restrictions on speech outside of abortion clinics. It's clearly a violation of the First Amendment. (2:04:42)James Woods weighs in when someone asks him "how evil is Hollywood?" (2:28:32)Irish Times falls prey to their bigotry with AI essay they believed was real. (2:37:41) Doc Octopus Arms, Camera w/o Lens: Tech Getting Dumber All the Time Desc: Is "fake it til you make it" the latest in tech "innovation"? How about AI that writes songs and gets paid to listen to its songs? The idiocracy of technology, however, is nothing compared to millennials and younger who wouldn't have a problem with government cameras watching them constantly at home (2:42:45)The "Rainbow" — it's all about attracting kids, says Jason Barker. LGBT doesn't see the irony in how they're using God's promise. (2:48:58)Spotify ripped off by massive AI grift (2:51:10)Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Come on, come on, yes, yes, come on. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Oh, curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham. And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering.

No, we bet. More power to you. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 8th of June, year of our Lord, 2023. Well, today we're going to be talking in the third hour to a First Amendment lawyer. He has an organization that defends speech everywhere. And it should be very interesting. They've had a lot of victories. The latest case that he has is about the FACE Act and also about state laws that are similar to that. That you're not allowed to speak to people anywhere around an abortion shrine.

But we're also going to begin by talking about depopulation. Are they pushing us towards the goal that we've seen manifested in so many different ways, from the deagle to the guidestones? Are they actually getting there? We'll be right back. Stay with us. Let me just say before I get into the depopulation topic that I want to begin with, as we look at these fires that are happening, I think it's even, I don't know, I looked at one of the maps and it showed clouds even down here to Tennessee and it has been very hazy the last several days. I don't know if that has anything to do with it or not, but certainly nothing at all like it is in New York. And we see that Governor

Hochul said tomorrow morning 1,000,095 masks will be made available at state facilities. 400,000 distributed to New Yorkers at one location and another 600,000 available at stockpiles for local governments to pick up. You see, they've been stockpiling this stuff, not for a forest fire. They're going to be putting it on our face again if we don't stop this. And it's one of the things I want to talk about when we get into the politics stuff. You know, Chris Christie is out and he had some very interesting things to say about the Trump family and the pardons and the grifts and things like that. Well, he went straight at them.

However, I'm going to remind you what Chris Christie was doing with the masks. Look, these masks have never worked. What they are good for, one person commented on that tweet from Governor Hochul and said, they're worthless. Masks didn't stop the virus from spreading to nearly the entire population. Well, these masks are not worthless if you've got something like a big smoke particle. They have been worthless for the stated purpose, and they were stockpiling them for the stated purpose and they were stockpiling them for the stated purpose. And before I leave this topic, I had people contact me and say,

so what do you think? Is there something up with these, the massive number of fires that they're having in Canada? No. Is this, um, you know, what,

what is really behind this? My honest opinion, it is what I've been saying for a very, very long time. and that is environmentalism that is at the core of this that's the policy that is part of this my uncle was um head of forestry department the university of missouri and let's see i guess it would have been 50 some odd years ago i was still in high school He was telling me how the wacko environmentalists were actually going to cause a lot of damage. He said they've rejected the idea of stewardship, where we actually manage the forest.

And now they've got this idea that everything is sacred and you don't touch it, right? And we saw this in many different ways uh all my life i'd never seen such a big forest fire in this area of the smoky mountains at this year's cheltenham glory rests in the lap of the gods curses alas our hero hasn't placed but there are still divine offerings up for grabs with all NoviBet customers getting a 10 euro free bet for every day

of Cheltenham and on top of that we're paying up to 7 places each way on selected races throughout the festival I declare this a most generous offering

NoviBet more power to you T&C Supply 18 plus bet responsibly gamblingcare.ie until I think it was

2013 14 15 somewhere around there, they had a massive forest fire. These things always start on government, quote-unquote, managed land because of their philosophy. And so we've seen this happen and spread out to others. Begin on government forest land. We've seen that happen here. We've seen it happen in Yellowstone. We've seen that happen here. We've seen it happen in Yellowstone.

We have seen it happen. And of course, Yellowstone is a much drier climate than it is here. But we also saw it happen up in Washington State when we went up there for reports. And Travis and I interviewed a lumberjack that was up there talking about the tyranny of the federal government, how they were trying to shut everything down. And that was, you know, around the time of Lavoie Finnegan being murdered by the FBI and the, you know, Malheur standoff and all the rest of that

stuff. We went up there in the aftermath of that aftermath of that. And, uh, he had, he was lumberjack. He'd worked all of his life and what he had invested and saved his money in, he didn't put the money in the bank, he bought land. And he bought forestry, areas that were going to be that he could harvest as his retirement. And it was a good plan. It was a smart plan. Except the problem with the plan was that the federal government had mismanaged the property, had a forest fire that began again on their property, just as it did in the Gatlinburg area, and spread out and devastated, destroyed his property that he had saved to purchase.

And as we were there, he said, you notice what is happening to this? All of the lumber mills were just rusting hulks. to purchase. And as we were there, he said, you notice what is happening to this? You know, all of the lumber mills were just rusting hulks. He said, they've shut down the use of everything here. And he said, the only thing, the only part of the economy that is still going is the federal government. They keep putting more and more people in here and everybody else the rest of the um the rest of the economy was stagnating suffocating dying from federal regulations as more and more federal bureaucrats were being moved into the area and uh as we talked about it yeah it was uh 40 years after my uncle had told me the lumberjack told me the same thing

from forestry professor to a lumberjack if you leave the wood there because it's too precious and we're not going to take out the dead wood once it dies we're not going to allow anybody to come in here and remove it it's going to stay there it's going to rot it's going to fall over into the forest and then when a natural forest fire occurs because of lightning strike or something like that, as he pointed out, it's like big containers of gasoline that are there. That dead wood that is on the ground becomes accelerant and it quickly gets out of hand. That's the reality of what is happening. And that's the difference from moving to really a Christian-based understanding of the fact that we have dominion

and we have stewardship. God has put us in charge of the earth. We're to take care of it. To one where we worship the earth like the environmentalists do, like Gaia. Which kind of brings us to this New World Order aspect of it. If you want to rule the world, first you need to destroy humanity. This is an article from Off Guardian. It has always been astounding to me, says Todd Hayden, that people think for even a second that their government makes decisions to help people. This has never been the case. If a government's decisions helps anybody, it's an unintended benefit. That's so true. The primary intent

is for power, control, money, to satisfy individual pursuits and the goals of the global narcissistic God complex elite. And remember this when we talk about presidential politics and we talk about Washington. If they do anything to help you, it's unintended. And they're like, how did that happen? We didn't mean for that to happen. Anyone, and it turns out to be almost everyone, who supports this and thinks that their government or their nation is operating in the people's interest is signing their own death warrant. Wherever you are on that fence, you've got to agree that things are rather different now than the founding fathers envisioned. He says, we can no longer trust the system to be objective,

compassionate, fair, benevolent, not self-serving or destructive. In fact, it seems that the system itself is selling out to foreign interests, and the actual sovereignty of the nation is threatened, and the threat is largely coming from within, this corrupt empire that is rotting from the inside. What we see is much like watching a sci-fi movie where the bad guys are stripping a nation of everything that makes it the representation of the people and creating a self-serving slave state, serving them. And so in light of that, we see John Kerry despairing

of population growth. He says it's unsustainable. We've got to do something to stop these people. This is an article out of Breitbart. John Kerry said a world population nearing 10 billion people by the middle of this century is unsustainable. I've been hearing that all my life. And I've been seeing that, yes, the population is increasing rapidly, but things have not changed. You know, this is many times larger, three times bigger than it was in 1950,

about the time I was born, a little bit after that I was born. But even with a tripling of the world population, we're not seeing the mass starvation that was always predicted in the 1970s. We didn't see the ice age. We didn't see the global warming. We didn't see the starvation. And yet these people persist because when we talk about the MacGuffins, when we talk about the COVID MacGuffin and the climate MacGuffin, understand that even though they have the same objectives for totally different things, and even though the climate MacGuffin doesn't change whether we're going to all freeze to death or the polarized gaps are going to melt, none of that changes.

But at the end of all of this is depopulation. All these MacGuffins are to kill humanity, which tells you what a satanic agenda it is. It is to end humanity. So Kerry said he's fearful for the future. I don't think it is sustainable personally. We need to figure out how we're going to deal with this issue of sustainability and the number of people that we are trying to take care of on the planet. Guess what, Kerry? Don't try. Don't even try to take care of us because we might wake

up and take care of you. We don't need your paternalism. We don't need you doing anything. We're doing just fine. We can work out the problems on our own. You and the rest of our government minders and the elites are absolutely, you are the most useless, the most, how did Trump put it? Non-essential. You are the non-essential people. Trump is non-essential. Kerry is non-essential. The Bushes, the Bidens, the Clintons, the Obamas, they're all non-essential.

So this is all based on the idea that he thinks by 2050 we'll have 10 billion mouths to feed on a finite planet. He said tuck into something that could change the world. Tuck, that's an interesting thing. Maybe Carrie needs to go to Target and get some of that tuck swimwear. Because you see, LGBT, as I said, it is a core value of these Western governments. Why is it a core value? Because at the core of LGBT is depopulation. You understand?

That's another aspect of it. They can kill us with wars. They can kill us with chemicals. They can kill us with injections. They can kill us with wars. They can kill us with chemicals. They can kill us with injections. They can kill us with LGBT. They can sterilize our kids. They can destroy people's wealth to have a family, to have children. That's another way to go with depopulation. In 2021, in an interview, he was asked, isn't the brutal truth, Mr. Kerry, that Americans have just got to eat less meat? And he says, well, not necessarily, not necessarily. You know, he just holds out that little bit of hope that maybe, you know, you can still have some meat. But in Norway,

they are rushing down this agenda. They've now come up with guidelines that they're going to try to coerce people in Norway to make sure that they don't have any more than 500 grams of red meat per week. That's one pound of meat a week, one pound. So that is coming from their equivalent of the EPA. They can have a lot of different ways that they can do that. You know know they can do what they're doing in Ireland and kill all the cows and what they're doing in the Netherlands and kill all the cows and steal all the land they can you know just arbitrarily put taxes on it restrictions with CBDC what you can buy a lot of different things that they can do with that and so I saw

this article and I hadn't thought about deagle for a long time. You know, Deagle was this website. I'm not sure that we know what it is. This is from the expose. The under the day, sorry, expose a dash news.com is their website, but they put it out from Deagle. And, you know, they say that it's a global intelligence and consulting firm. I don't know what it is. At this year's Cheltenham, glory rests in the lap of the gods. Curses. Alas, our hero hasn't placed. But there are still divine offerings up for grabs, with all NoviBet customers getting a €10 free bet for every day of Cheltenham.

And on top of that, we're paying up to seven places each way on selected races throughout the festival. I declare this a most generous offering. NoviBet. More power to you. T's and C's apply. 18 plus bet responsibly. Gamblingcare.ie It was very strange that it was out there

and it created a lot of stir when they put it out in 2015 and said, had their population projections for different countries, they showed a very, very slight, teeny-tiny change downward for China, but massive changes down for the United States and Europe, going down 50%, 60%, 70% decrease in population within 10 years. So they came out in 2015.

They went 10 years in the future, which is 2025. And I hadn't thought about that for a long time. A lot of speculation. And again, I don't know who put it together, who is behind it. They have removed that site, but you can still find it on the Wayback Machine. If you know what you're looking for. And if you want to go look at it, there's a link in this article from the expose. But they put this in the context of saying, you know,

the 2025 depopulation forecast from Deagle looks like it's on target due to all these millions and millions of excess deaths, about 2 million just in the United States. And then infertility, miscarriages, the death of children due to this vaccine. And it is due to the vaccine. It didn't happen in 2020. It happened in 2021 and in 2022. And if you look at, and this is what was so alarming when I was talking about the vaccine

in early in January of 2021, I said, do you see all these people that are dying within 24, 48 hours? This is totally unprecedented. We've never seen anything like this. And it's more than, you know, first it was like more than five years of all these other vaccine deaths combined. And it's happening immediately that We've not seen that type of thing before. And then very rapidly, it went up to become more than all 30-plus years of them tracking this in their various databases. But usually a vaccine has issues over a long period of time. I think we're going to see a lot of things like we see with the movie star., we see with, um, the movie star, what's the guy had the brain hemorrhage, um, the black movie star, Jamie Foxx, who had the brain hemorrhage.

And of course, uh, uh, his family said, Oh, he's playing pickleball now. He's much better. Well, uh, why isn't he doing the movie then? That doesn't make any sense. There's more additional reports that he is undergoing therapy after a stroke. But nevertheless, when we look at this, it is kind of an interesting perspective that maybe they are getting what they wanted. Deagle had predicted that the UK would see its population decline by 77% by the year 2025. And they predicted that in 2020.

When you look at some of the other predictions, they predicted in 2020 that the US would see its population decline within five years by 68.5%. That Germany would see a 65% decline in five years. That Australia would see a 34.6% decline in five years. So it is interesting to see that. And it's also interesting when you look at the figures to see that China only had a slight decrease. Everybody else's GDP was just devastated.

The U.S. was like dropped by like 80 know, like 80, 85 percent or something like that. Whereas China actually went up, according to Deagle. So anyway, when we look at these types of numbers, it is we may not know who these people are, what they're basing this on. Maybe this is a. Website that is what it says it is. They say, we're not affiliated with any government organization. This is just a volunteer thing that we're doing. Oh, really? I certainly did get a lot of publicity. And then after I got a lot of publicity, they didn't want to step into the limelight and talk about it. The U.S. has suffered 675,000 excess deaths in 2021, another 435,000 excess deaths by week 49 of 2022, over a million, 1.1 million excess deaths in two

years. Maybe this is why you can't find people to work, anything. And they say, well, it's the baby boomers retiring. Well, I don't know. But around here, we see the people that are working are the baby boomers. And they can't find anybody any younger to, maybe they're not interested in working. I don't know. But if we go back and we look at this Deagle report, they would go in and they would do it nation by nation. And they would talk about military strength. So it looked like maybe it was something that was certainly people

putting together. We're looking at gross domestic product, at military expenditures, at population. As I said, China would go down a little bit from 1.1 billion, 370 million people to 1 billion, 360 million people. They would only go down by 10 million people, according to their prediction. The U.S., on the other hand, would go from 321 million to 61 million. And you would actually see the gross domestic product of China go up by 30%. Whereas the United States, it went down by 50%. I'm sorry, it went down much more than that. It went down from 17 or 18 trillion, let's just round it up, from $18 trillion to $900 billion. So we're looking at something that is a 95% reduction. I'm just going off the top of my head here.

I didn't do this before. And when they talked about this back in 2015, what did they talk about? They said, well, a pandemic might do this. That's kind of interesting. In their footnotes, a pandemic scenario where healthcare won't be available, the overwhelming number of infected leading to a dramatic increase in the death rate due to lack of proper healthcare. And of course, that was the beard that they tried to roll this thing out. What'd they say about themselves? This website is nonprofit, built on spare time, and we provide information and services as is without any further explanations and or guarantees.

We are not linked to any government in any way, shape, or form. And, of course, if they were, that's exactly what you would expect them to say. You'd also expect them to start talking about UFOs, I think. Let me get some of the comments that are here before we get any further into this depopulation thing here. Angus Mustang, I think Bill Gates has blocked the sun over the Northeast. He found a cheaper way to do it with wildfires. 10 degrees cooler here than it was supposed to be yesterday.

It has been much cooler this entire year. It has been very pleasant here. And I was watching the temperatures because I remember when we moved last year. My sons were out there and we were moving stuff. And every day in Austin, it was over 100 degrees. And it was like 20 degrees every Uh, every day it was up in the eighties, same time that last year it was over a hundred degrees. So yeah, talk about global

warming. Let's talk about geoengineering, what they want to do. And yeah, they were very concerned about hiding things. Uh, another listener says, I just went outside. The sun is much more visible this morning compared to yesterday. The air isn't accurate. Maybe it'll be a good day today. I hope. Uh, Steven Caspar says I live in North Jersey. It looked like I was on another planet sky, all yellow. The sun looked like an orange blob in the sky. And at night the moon was orange. We were laughing about this last night. My son said, uh, some people put out on, uh, on some comments. I said, it looks like Canada put on the Mexico filter. And I said, what? And he said, well, you know, whenever they film in Mexico,

they give it kind of an orange filter to try to convey a certain feel of dustiness or whatever. We're choking here in Pennsylvania, says Damage. He said, they had us under warnings yesterday that the air quality was bad. They said on the news to basically not leave our homes. Uh, another, and then also he said, or he or she says, I just went outside. The sun is much more visible this morning. Uh, but anyway, um, uh, Heron H says I worked for the forestry commission in the 1980s and 90s in northeast Victoria of Australia.

We had a great team of foresters and employees who knew the bush well and did regular burns every season. Greenies changed it all. Yep. And fires have been out of control ever since. Same thing. Yep. Government gave redundancy packages to the older staff who knew heaps about the land. Sadly, their knowledge left with them. Same old story. Yeah. Happening

everywhere. Uh, the, uh, greens, the environmentalists. Um, so, um, scroll down a little bit. There's another one that I, I pray for you and all those suffering from the smoke, said in a comment to another person, said Macer7. Don't leave your houses and wear masks or directives, I heard yesterday. I've heard that somewhere before. That's right. See, they've kept all the masks in reserve, just like they've kept their usurped political power in reserve as well uh jason barker replying to angus mustang um who said we're not seeing a sea levels rise either al gore said manhattan would be underwater before 2014 that's right they shouldn't be worrying about this jason barker said google

ai is programmed to believe the ocean has risen 9 to 12 inches since the industrial revolution. There you go. Well, that's a big, if you ever got out of your house, uh, you could walk any number of places and see for yourself. And that's not true. Now, Google AI may have been programmed that way, but clearly Obama and the rest of these people don't believe it because they're buying, uh, these people who are calling us to shut everything down. They're buying oceanfront property on Long Island and other places in Maine. Angus Mustang. Yeah, it's amazing how they're afraid we'll all die in the next 10 years if we don't start driving electric cars. But the vaccine killing people, that's just fine.

Yeah, nothing to see there. Let's move on. Is genocide too powerful a word? We're going to talk about that when we come back, because there's a lot to be said about this. And this really ties in. We're going to take a look, not a deep dive look. I'm not going to get into the weeds that much,

but we're going to take a look at where this goes back to and how this is all tied into transhumanism, into the technocracy, and all the rest of this stuff when we come back. So stay with us. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us.

Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com So should we use the term genocide? Is that too powerful a word? This is an article from American Thinker. They talk about, well, you know, Jews annihilated by the Nazis, Uyghurs by the Chinese Communist Party, Ukrainians by Stalin.

They don't go back to who coined the word. When was genocide coined well it was what the turks did to the armenians that's when they first coined that and that was before any of that had happened uh but um when you talk about ukraine uh the a lot of more a man-made famine that Stalin did to the people in Ukraine from 1932 to 1933 caused mass starvation in what was really the breadbasket of Russia and that area. The famine is often called the Halamador because it's the combination in ukrainian from hunger and extermination and that's why when we talk about what is happening here that is how these people are operating you know they are marxists right they are neo-marxists as george gilder has pointed out they have the same fundamental conceits that karl did, thinking, well, we got the Industrial Revolution.

We have abundant material goods. There's nothing that was withheld from anybody. It's just a matter of how do we distribute it. So now we need to have the government redistribute this massive wealth of the Industrial Revolution. And, of course, that wasn't true. And, of course, the government, whenever that happens, the people who are running it, the communist leaders, redistribute everything to themselves, of course. But we see the neo-Marxists out of Silicon Valley, as George Gilder calls it. He says, well, they think that they have infinite resources with their computer programs and their technology, and now they will allocate most of these resources to themselves.

They will create universal basic income for the rest of us, but it is nothing other than a high-tech communist slavery like we've seen in the past. And so it is really about extermination through famine, through hunger. And that's why these people are going to keep coming after the food supply. That is going to be central to everything that they're doing. The anti-human side of today's environmental movement, deep ecology movement to decimate human population under a billion, under one billion people. The global warming alarmists, tyrannical and anti-growth tendencies, the notion of granting legal and enforceable legal rights to nature, that nature would have rights,

the concomitant international campaign to criminalize large-scale resource exploitation as ecocide. Ian Plymer out of Ireland talking about the 200,000 head of cattle, which is where they're going to start. It's not going to stop there, that they want to destroy in Ireland. He said this can only end in disaster like the potato famine. That's what the purpose of this is. Here in the U.S., under the guise of conservation,

acres of usable farmland now being exploited for so-called green deals. And then there's transgenderism. Not just the drugs, but the sterilizing surgery to make sure these kids that they've grabbed at an early age, confused them, are not going to be able to have children. The erasure of modern appliances, which have made life superior in America, are now being touted as good for the planet. And the well-being of people and what they want? Forget about that. So our universities have now become not something that gives you a liberal education that liberates

you to think. They have now become institutions that punish you if you think. Everything upside down, inverted. The ultimate goal of the globalist is to create a singleton. Sweden's Jacob Nordengard, PhD in technology and social change, gave a presentation. This is on expose-news.com. They went over some of what he said in his presentation.

He's also written five books. His latest one is The Digital World Brain. And I thought this was very interesting because it does really fold into Elon Musk's worldview, his family's history, and all the rest of this stuff. Futurists are not merely content with describing or forecasting the future. People like Thomas Malthus, who, you know, Malthusian ideas, oh, we're all going to die. We've got too many people, right?

It's where John Kerry is. It's where the World Economic Forum and all the green agenda is, typically Malthusian. Malthus said we had to do something about the population. We have to control population because if the population grows too much, we won't have enough food to eat. So kill the other people, right? But then when you look at our more recent roots into all of this, which gets into the technocracy and the current batch of elites. It really goes traced back to H.G. Wells, and that's what Dr. Nordengard was talking about.

He said he was the first modern futurist, had big visions for the world. He published a collection of his essays in a book that was titled World Brain, which is about the perfect ideal society, a utopia run with management techniques, and how this new world should be created through an open conspiracy. And of course, one of the key things that he did was the book in 1933. He did Shape of Things to Come.

Within three years, they made it into the movie Things to Come come 1936 if you remember seeing that and that was very powerful for the people the uh the elitist the uh eugenicists the technocrats of his day oh they love that so the book comes out in 1933. The film comes out in 1936. And in 1936, the maternal grandfather of Elon Musk, Joshua Haldane, tries to put it into action in Canada. He creates an organization that lasted for about five years. He tried to overthrow the Canadian government and to create a technocracy. He beat the rap and didn't get sent to jail, but he left Canada. That's how the family got to South Africa. And Elon Musk himself, heavily into technocracy, heavily into transhumanism, which is,

you know, we will become like gods type of thing, and says that he believes, which is, you know, we will become like God's type of thing. And says that he believes that Twitter is, quote, a collective cybernetic superintelligence. In other words, a hive mind that he can shape, that he can make it better. You see? I really think that, you know, a lot of people say, well, is he angling for some kind of political advantage? No, he's not interested in simply being the leader of one world. I mean, one government. He wants to be the leader of one world.

Not the president of one nation. Not even of the United States. He's got bigger objectives. And he has already pulled the wool over the eyes of most conservatives who hail him as a self-sacrificing messiah, philanthropist, protecting our free speech. H.G. Wells was close friends with Julian Huxley, who coined the term transhumanist, emergingging of Man with Machine, which Julian Huxley referred to as an evolutionary humanism. And then they worked with Professor Oliver Reiser, who wrote a book titled The World Sensorium. It was about a world federation run by scientists.

That's what he called the world brain, the world sensorium. You see the trend here? They all saw technology as allowing them to become rulers of the earth. That was what it was all about. Reiser then outlined a plan for the world in the book Cosmic Humanism and World Unity. In this book, they stated what they wanted to achieve in their utopia. You see, the key thing about this is that they were all secular humanists, and they were just taking this, and, you know, let's merge, let's use technology. Maybe we can even merge with it, but we're going to control other people with this technology. Similar, in a way, with what Hugo de Garis wrote about in his book,

The Artilect War. He said artificial intelligence, he was somebody who worked in the field. He's not a Christian. He believes that it's really going to happen. He believes that if he makes an exact enough replica of the human brain that it'll spring to life, become human or something, right? He's not a Christian. He doesn't really have any understanding of mind, body, soul, spirit, any of that.

No, he doesn't understand that. Instead, if we can just reproduce it materialistically, somehow the spark of life will come, and it'll become a real thing. But he also looks at this and he thinks, he said, I think if people realize what we're doing, because, you know, if they see all this power being accrued here, if they get concerned about artificial intelligence, he said, I think the response of the elite will be withdraw, perhaps even to near space orbit. And there will be an artilect war of the elite against the rest of us who remain on Earth. With their advanced technology, he said,

it will result in giga death, billions of people being killed. This is the way that these people believe it'll happen as well. They call this project Solomon's Temple. They were not referring to a physical temple in Jerusalem, but rather a temple in the sky, a satellite system with science running everything, and the UN as the world's government. The World Future Society was founded in 1966 and incorporated the ideas of Huxley, Reiser, etc. Some of the well-known people that were a part of that were the English author Arthur C. Clarke, 2001 Space Odyssey, that stuff. The American computer scientist Ray Kurzweil, who is still working at Google. And he was hired personally by Larry Page to work on their new projects.

One of the people, Ray Kurzweil, is one of the people who is pushing for the singularity. Of course, he's funded by Peter Thiel. Peter Thiel and Elon Musk push for the singularity as well. Stanford Research Institute ran cooperation. These think tanks, as Dr. Nordengard said, the military has always been futurist. The Malthusian doomsday ideology, the Club of Rome, was founded in 1968 as they were

pushing depopulation, and you all know about that, I'm sure. In 1975, the World Futurist Society had a meeting in Washington to discover how they could influence opinion to create the society that they envisioned, and they put out a publication, a book, that same year. The next 25 years, which would take us to the year 2000. Crisis and opportunity. There's no better time to implement radical change than after a worldwide catastrophe, they said. In 1977, the Club of Rome published a report, The Goals of Mankind, where they said the ideal sustainable population is more than 500 million,

but less than a billion. And so you see as John Kerry believes this, that's one of the reasons why this is freaking out. Oh, 10 billion? We can't do that. We have to have something that is one-tenth that population or maybe one-twentieth of that population so we need to reduce it by you know 90 95 percent a 2002 report titled the great transition initiative six global scenarios on how to transition the world to be the way they want it, with them ruling it.

The creation of a world government, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations, behind the report, said Dr. Nordengard. Six scenarios, including techniques to change the world, an unprecedented pandemic, again, at the center of all of this. Pandemics, wars, that's how they seek to do it. And of course, sterilization and destroying the will of humanity

to have families. You know, there is a pushback that is beginning in some places and it's about time we do it here. In Italy, they're pushing back very hard against Pride Month. They're even putting out Italian Family Month

in the same month. That's what it looks like. Look at this. We celebrate babies. We celebrate family. Family day. We have to be for something, not just against something. That is the key thing. We have to focus on what we want the world to look like instead of playing defense all the time against their vision, their dystopian vision. It's all about technology. It's about the scientific management of our planet, said Dr. Nordengarten. He said ultimately they want to create a singleton that means one,

you know, overall hive mind, a world government, all the rest of this. I don't think that they will succeed, he said, because they don't work from truth. They work from lies. He said, truth always wins in the end. Well, that is because God always ends in the end. He wins. As Jesus said, I am the way, the truth, and the life. We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show

well i want to talk a little bit about what is happening. We had some other people that have entered the presidential race. Let's talk a little bit, though, first about political corruption at all different levels. I talked a week and a half ago, I guess it was, about Ken Paxton and the fight that was going on there in Texas. This is an article from Raw Story. And, of course, they lean left. But you can certainly see what is happening. Their headline is Ken Paxton impeachment case is, quote, a slam dunk and worse, much worse than most people know, said prosecuting attorneys. After years of legal problems,

including an indictment of FBI investigation and allegations of retaliation against subordinates and improper use of government funds to support a donor. Now longtime Texas attorney general Ken Paxton has been impeached and faces a trial in the state Senate next month. The evidence is, quote, 10 times worse, unquote, than what has been revealed to the public set of attorneys who will be arguing the case. One of them, a famous criminal defense attorney, Dick DeGaran, who has represented clients ranging from the former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay to convicted murder and New York City real estate heir Robert Durst to David Koresh is now determined to save and protect the people of Texas from a crooked attorney general, he said. He said it's a matter of corruption, a matter of abuse of public trust, a matter of misuse of public resources, flat out

bribery, perjury, said DeGaran, who before he was defending famous people was a prosecutor himself. He says it's just conduct that convinces anyone that looks at it fairly that the office of attorney general has been abused and used for personal gain. And of course you can see this. It's pretty apparent in the bipartisan move against him. And you had the committee that recommended the articles of impeachment that looked at it in detail, said they were appalled. They voted unanimously. It is a bipartisan committee.

They voted unanimously to impeach him. And then the vast majority of the House voted to impeach him. And yet what he did was he played a partisan defense because he defended trump and of course he defended trump and went way over the line defending trump after these crimes these alleged crimes committed. It could have been a way of inoculating himself. Because, you see, the MAGA people only care that he was loyal to Trump. And this is why this is a national story. Because you've had so many people come to his defense and say, look at this, you've got the rhinos who are coming after Ken Paxton.

Well, it used to be that the last refuge of a scoundrel was patriotism. Now it appears that the last refuge of a scoundrel is to be loyal to Trump. At least it inoculates you. That kind of inoculation works. Not the Trump shots. Allegations that he improperly used his office to give legal support to Nate Paul. And the most amazing thing about this is that the allegations of how he improperly used his office was that he put out a broad statewide moratorium on foreclosures. So this guy wouldn't lose his businesses.

The same type of thing that Trump did, you know, using, uh, having the CDC say that nobody can have any foreclosures or evictions. And that was a move to steal property from people. It's just amazing. Nobody should have been locked down in the first place. Nobody should have lost their job. But instead of fixing that fundamental problem, Trump had his CDC do this and he extended that. And then of course, Biden extended it as well, several times. Totally unconstitutional power grab by the CDC. But all of it going back to the lockdown. And of course, if you look at the election, this mail election with all of its fraud and its ballot harvesting and the rest of this stuff,

was predicated on Trump's lockdown. Anyway, they said, according to whistleblower complaints, and again, he had eight people file complaints. Four of them filed a lawsuit. And then he settled with them on the lawsuit for several million dollars. I think if I remember now, it was a couple of weeks, three and a half million or something like that. And then he took the bill to the Texas Congress, state Congress, the House and the Senate, presented them with the bill, said, here, I'd like for you to pay this. They looked at it, what's this for? What? What? And that's when the impeachment things began.

It's because he had the hubris to ask them to pay for what he had done and been sued by people in his department who were all Republicans and had been part of the party for a very long time. After he was charged with security fraud, he allegedly accepted a $100,000 donation to his legal defense fund from the president of a medical imaging firm that his office was simultaneously investigating for Medicaid fraud. See, this is why the people in that worked for him went to the FBI. Anyway, he also took $50,000 from the family of Tom Gleason, a former ice cream company executive he later hired for an advisor role and paid him $95,000 a year, according to the Associated Press. Gleason was reportedly fired within two months for sharing child pornography during a meeting. You can't make this stuff up. This is like the Babylon Bee. You've got a guy who sells ice cream

and he's a pedophile and then he gets hired by Ken Paxton oh yeah the stereotypes just keep coming don't they Trump and his allies who relied on Paxton to launch a frivolous lawsuit to try to overturn the 2020 presidential election are standing behind him, Trump even threatening to go after any Republican who tries to remove him from office. And then you have George Santos. Well, we're talking about corruption in New York. He loses a bid to shield the people who guaranteed his half a million dollar bail. Now, we don't know yet who these people are because the judge says, well, I'm going to give you till June the 9th, which is tomorrow, to file an appeal and keep these identities secret.

However, if you look at what has recently happened with Sam Bateman Fried, the FTX scam artist, he tried to keep the identities of people who had secured his bond secret. And that request was denied. And so they're doing the same type of thing to George Santos. So as people were speculating on who might be the sugar daddies and all this stuff. Is indicted Chinese billionaire tycoon Guo, secretly bankrolling George Santos' bail. Now, this Guo guy, he has been likened to his story, has been likened to the story of a spy thriller, and he may very well be a CCP spy. This is a guy who became a multi-billionaire, once one of China's richest men.

Guess what? You don't become a billionaire in China unless you've got strong ties to the Communist Party elite. And so he claims that this went south, and he decided that he would become opposition in exile. And that's his story. I don't know that I would trust him on this. He's been involved with Steve Bannon. As a matter of fact, Steve Bannon, when he was arrested for the charges of fraud with Bill DeWall.

And of course, the veteran who has lost, I don't know if he's a quadriplegic or he's lost both legs and arm in terms of being able to use them or amputation. But anyway, he's in jail. Trump didn't pardon that guy. He did pardon his friend, Steve Bannon, though. And yet, they're coming after Steve Bannon again because this activist Manhattan district attorney

who's been coming after Trump has decided that since he'd not been found guilty, Trump couldn't pardon him, so he's going to keep coming. So, anyway, Guo has portrayed himself as a rapper as an online influencer as a crypto guru as a real estate mogul but everybody's wondering what is really going on with this and of course he himself has some legal issues as well so the question is is he the guy behind Santos? The reason this article is being written is because this person says, well, Santos doesn't want us to know who the sponsors were. He said when the press asked him, he said, you will never find out the identities of these three people. This is information you will never get, he said, because your intention is to go and harass them and to make their life miserable.

And you're not going to get that. And again, when we look at the unbelievable lies and grifting of this guy, George Santos, I think it is a complete, you want to talk about indictments? This is an indictment of Kevin McCarthy, Marjorie Taylor Greene, all the rest of these Republicans who justify what he did because of partisanship. In the same way that Trump justified what Ken Paxton did because he's a Trump supporter. He did things for Trump. Hey, you know, this is the very definition, folks, of corruption. And it's corruption in our midst. I've given up on the Democrat Party. We should

demand better from the Republican Party, shouldn't we? Shouldn't we have at least one party that we could have a little bit of respect for? I don't have any respect for the Republicans when they do this type of stuff. Even the identities of the people who offered to post bail for Ghislaine Maxwell were made public in court documents. So if they're going to get it from Sam Bankman-Fried and Ghislaine Maxwell, probably it's going to happen with Santos as well. So we will find out. But around the same time that Santos was indicted and shortly before he needed the bail money, he apparently picked up an interest in Guo.

He started tweeting about him and tweeting in defense of him. And then federal prosecutors brought an indictment against Guo in March, accusing him of running a complicated billion-dollar fraud scheme that stole money from his political supporters. Guo claims to be exiled from China. Forbes calculated his net worth to be $1.1 billion in 2015. Some people believe that he may be a spy for China. We should always keep that in mind. One of his pet projects, along with Steve Bannon, is the new federal state of China. A purported government in exile. And when I looked at that, I thought, wow.

Wow. supported government in exile. And when I looked at that, I thought, wow, wow, this could possibly be, because it looks a carbon copy of Felix Dzerzhinsky's The Trust. He was the guy who ran the secret service for Lenin, the Cheka. And he created this thing called The Trust. And what he did was it was going to be the government in exile of all the people who were opposed to the Bolsheviks after the Russian revolution. And the Russian government linen was lavishly funding this through his secret service run by Felix Dzerzhinsky. And it even roped in the guy that Ian Fleming said he patterned James Bond on a sibling Riley lured him in, got him killed.

And this is the same type of intelligence honey trap you've seen run over and over again. And this could very well be the same thing. Prosecutors allege that Guo illegally took money from the Rule of Law Foundation, the Rule of Law Society, two nonprofits he founded that have a similar policy objective. So this guy on Long Island, Soros tweeted out and he said, Miles Guo has been detained since March 15th without bail. The CCP corruption runs deep. He said,

Miles Guo is a political prisoner of the CCP inside the United States, he said in a tweet two days later. Let that sink in. Well, the next day, he was in custody himself for his own alleged fraud scheme, but it wasn't in political retaliation of that. That had been there since right after the election. We found out about the fraud that's there. And as I talk about the fraud, and as they are lining up to put out an indictment against Trump, I don't support that.

You know, I think when people go back in future generations, as they start to, where do we get this phrase, trumped-up charges? Well, I think that was because of Donald, you know. I don't want trumped-up charges against Donald. I think Donald ought to be charged as a traitor against the Constitution for the lockdowns and everything else that he funded and encouraged and did in 2020. I think he ought to be standing international trial for the murders

with his warp speed vaccine that he produced, that he funded, that he bragged about for years. Put him in jail for those things, for his warp speed poison, for his 2020 treason. But they won't because they're part of that crime as well, which makes it all the more surprising that they'd actually come after him for some of this document stuff because everybody does it. And that's one of the reasons why I say these are trumped-up charges. And I believe, and I've said it before, I'll say it again, I think this is being done to turn him into a martyr because the Democrats want him and the Republican Party.

He's dividing the Republican Party. He is going to easily get the nomination of the Republican Party and then lose to whoever he runs against. Because not just the Democrats, but the independents can't stand Trump. So as much as he is dearly loved by the Republican establishment, this is why the Democrats are engaged in what is obviously political persecution and trumped up charges. They've got a couple of different grand juries. They've got a grand jury in Washington, D.C., looking at the January 6th stuff, also looking at some of the document stuff. And then there's another grand jury in Florida looking at document stuff.

And, of course, we all know about grand juries, that you can get them to indict a ham sandwich. So you've got Jack Smith making two ham sandwiches, you know, in Florida and in Washington, D.C. And the reason we say that is because there is no defense, no opposition in a grand jury. They convene these people and they get one side of the story from the prosecutor. And if you can't get them to indict somebody, you really just need to hang it up. You can indict anybody over this kind of stuff.

And so I think the real motivation of these people is to make sure that Trump is pushed up in the Republican Party. Bannon, previously charged with contempt in Congress, convicted of two charges of that in July, has already been sentenced to four months in federal prison, but the sentence has been suspended while he appeals. That's why he's not in prison. But again, going back to the prosecutors who are asking for indictments

on obstruction and on Espionage Act charges, what a ridiculous thing this is. And again, look at where this is. It's the Espionage Act charges. What a ridiculous thing this is. And again, look at where this is. It's the Espionage Act. Do you remember that? Do you remember how much we talked about this in years past? I talked about it. The Espionage Act that was created in 1917

under that notorious Woodrow Wilson authoritarian regime lying us into World War I and all the rest of this stuff. But there were more people charged under the Espionage Act, under the Obama administration, than everybody else combined in the previous 100 years. The Espionage Act has been a tool of the Obama-Biden administrations. A big tool. And that is what they're coming after Trump with, which is why I say yet another issue of trumped-up political persecution. A separate grand jury meeting in Florida has also been hearing evidence in the documents investigation.

The defense from Trump's lawyers. And again, he's screaming in all uppercase, it's a witch hunt, it's a witch hunt. That part of it is actually true. Again, he's got a long list of crimes, but that part of it is a witch hunt, and that's what they focused on. Trump's lawyers are going to rely on a U.S. district court case in Washington more than a decade ago involving Bill Clinton that concluded that a president had broad and mostly unchallengeable

power to determine which documents from his presidency can be kept personally, and that any documents moved to Trump's homes in Mar-a-Lago, Florida, or to Bedminster, New Jersey, all fall under that category. See, Clinton did it and got away with it. And besides that, he had Sandy Berger go in and get a bunch of 9-11 papers and stuff them in his pants and destroy them. They still talk about that at the National Archives. Regardless of who this person is and how important they've been in the past, don't let them do this kind of stuff. So we've had Clinton do it. And of course, recently we've seen Biden, Carter, Pence.

All these people have had papers. Who's the one person they're going to go after? Trump. It disgusts me to see this. The purpose is to make him a martyr. The purpose is to make him the nominee. That's one of the most calculating things about this, in my opinion. Biden, meanwhile, these bribery allegations have been around since 2017,

and they're doing nothing about it. Biden and the FBI has information that he had with Hunter and Hunter's special appointments getting into this oil company that he knows nothing at all about. Hunter has never injected oil into his body or snorted it or sniffed it or swallowed it or anything else. It doesn't give you any hallucinogenic effects. He has no interest in oil or the oil business. He's all about drugs and sex. So what's he doing on the board of this Ukrainian government?

Well, he's collecting $5 million for Biden. That's what he's doing. And everybody has known about this, known about it for six years. So I said, this is going to be another one of these John Durham things. Don't get your expectations up. As you have James Comer running the house oversight committee. He's the chairman there. He said, I want this information fromight Committee. He's the chairman there. He said, I want this information from the FBI. They said, no, we're not going to give it to you. So he says, okay, I'm going to come after Christopher Wray.

I'm going to begin contempt hearings about this. And so what does Christopher Wray, this corrupt creep at the FBI, say? He says, all right, I'll let you see it. But only under certain circumstances. We're going to have this as you can look at it, but you can't make notes, you can't talk about it, all the rest of this stuff, that type of thing. The source familiar with it said all members of the panel, just this committee, would be able to view the document in question in a secure location. Unclear whether the secure location would be a sensitive,

compartmented information facility on Capitol Hill or whether that would be at the FBI's headquarters. Now Comer says, this is not what I'm talking about. This does not satisfy what I want to stop from coming at you with the contempt. Despite the accommodation, Comer said Monday that the FBI is not in compliance with the subpoena to turn this over, to turn the physical document to the committee. At the briefing, the FBI again refused to hand over the unclassified record to the custody of the House Oversight Committee,

and we will now initiate contempt of Congress hearings this Thursday, today. We'll see what happens. But you see how obstinate you have Christopher Wray? Why don't they impeach this guy, right? Don't hold him in contempt. He's done many other things for which he ought to be impeached. You need to impeach Merrick Garland, his boss. You need to impeach him. They just need to start this process down the line. I don't know when they're going to stop with these dog and pony show hearings because they absolutely accomplished nothing except getting their picture in the news

and their name in the newspapers. Audi MRR, thank you so much for the tip. I appreciate that. He says, back on Twitter, and something is very apparent. Ever since Elon Musk bought the platform, there's been an extraordinary amount of video footage of violence, from brawls to actual brutal gun deaths. No alerts or content warnings. Yet, if I use a term like moron, I get a no-no warning. Musk is willfully allowing Twitter to foster a culture of chaos for an agenda.

That's Audi at Modern Retro Radio. Yeah, that is interesting. He says it's so obvious that the establishment is propping up Trump to be the GOP nominee. It's 2019 all over again. Well, we're going to take a break. When we come back, we're going to talk about the election. We had some amazing things being said by Chris Christie yesterday. He's going to be very combative. And even as DeSantis has made his digs at Trump more direct. They're still somewhat guarded.

Not Chris Christie. We'll be right back. Decoding the mainstream propaganda. It's the David Knight Show. All right, let's talk a little bit about the election and about Chris Christie. He's going to make it interesting in a food fight type of way, just like RFK Jr. is making it interesting in policy stuff. And we're going to take a look at RFK Jr.'s visit to the border, what he said.

He actually went there unlike biden unlike lala unlike most of the candidates he actually went there but let's talk about chris christie he pulls no punches says um mainstream media here we have the ap talking about this um christie launched his campaign with broad ranging historical references to successful political leaders from the past, and then promptly began an unapologetic assault on Trump's record and public scandals. He said, call Trump. He said, well, didn't call him by name initially. He said a lonely, self-consumed, self-serving mirror hog is not a leader.

So now we have pretenders all around us who want to tell you, pick me because I'm kind of like what you picked before, but I'm not quite as crazy. And I don't want to say his name because for these other pretenders, he is for those of you who read the Harry Potter books like Voldemort, he who shall not be named. Of course, he's talking about DeSantis. He said, DeSantis is kind of afraid of coming after him too directly. And so let me be clear, in case I have not been already, the person I'm talking about

who is obsessed with the mirror, who never admits a mistake, who never admits a fault, who always finds someone else and something else to blame for whatever goes wrong, but finds every reason to take credit for anything that goes right,

is Donald Trump. That's what Chris Christie said. And then he got a lot more combative. Listen to what he said about Jared and Ivanka and the Trump family in general. Let me tell you something, everybody. The grift from this family is breathtaking. It's breathtaking.

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Kushner walk out of the White House and months later get $2 billion from the Saudis? $2 billion from the Saudis. You think it's because he's some kind of investing genius? Or do you think it's because he was sitting next to the President of the United States for four years doing favors for the Saudis? That's your money. That's your money he stole. And gave it to his family.

You know what that makes us? A banana republic. That's what it makes us. So, he may get 30% again. I'm not sure. Maybe he'll get more. so he may get 30 again i'm not sure maybe he'll get more maybe he'll get less but let me tell you what he'll know in 2024 that he had no idea of in 2016 he's in for a fight to get it well again you know as that republican candidate said we should not criticize the fine people who work for Banana Republic. Do we even know a Banana Republic when we see it?

A lot of Republicans don't, including a lot of the Republican candidates there. And I thought it was kind of interesting. I didn't know that Ivanka is now calling herself Ivanka Kushner instead of Ivanka Trump. But what he said there, he said they walk out of the White House and months later they get $2 billion, with a B, $2 billion from the Saudis. He said, you think that's because he's some kind of an investing genius, or do you think it's because he was sitting next to the president of the U.S. for four years doing favors for the Saudis? Kind of interesting. I don't know why.

Well, I do know why. I think that they want Trump to look bad, so they put all these charges against him. But they don't really want to convict him for anything, so they're not going to look at the charges of bribery too closely. And of course, you know, Biden is skating through a bribery anyway. But we got Giuliani selling pardons for $2 million. But hey, we're talking about a state here. We're talking about the state of Saudi Arabia getting special favors. Well, that goes up to $2 billion. So, you know, Giuliani can sell stuff for $2 million and Kushner can sell stuff for $2 billion. And interestingly enough, Kushner's company got that $2 billion investment from a fund

that was run by Mohammed bin Salman, the clown prince of Saudi Arabia. The fund's advisors did not like that. They all opposed that publicly. No, we shouldn't be giving them $2 billion, right? You don't want to protest too loudly. You might get the Khashoggi treatment, right, from that guy, MBS. Anyway, Christie went on. He said the grift from this family's breathtaking

as you heard he said that's your money that's your money he stole and he gave it to his family you know what that makes us a banana republic that's what it makes us and of course chris christy has some history with the kushners when he was u.s attorney for the District of New Jersey, he prosecuted Kushner's father, Charles Kushner, who pled guilty in 2005 to 18 counts of tax evasion, witness tampering, and making illegal campaign donations. And then Trump pardoned him in 2020. So, you know, there's that aspect of it. He knows the Kushners are crooks.

He put the daddy in jail, and then he watches Trump pardon him, and then watches the son of the crook that he put in jail get $2 billion from the Saudis because of his connections and the favors that he was doing for them. But you know, Chris Christie himself has got more baggage than Sam Britton. Look at what he had to say about the masks. This message isn't for everyone. It's for all those people who refuse to wear a mask. You know, lying in isolation in ICU for seven days, I thought about how wrong I was to remove my mask at the White House. Today, Yeah, well, he did wind up on the wrong side of history. Please wear a mask. Yeah, well, he did wind up on the wrong side of history, isn't it?

Isn't that interesting? You cut that PSA that ends, if you don't wear the mask, we're all going to end up on the wrong side of history. Well, he ended up on the wrong side of history, didn't he? Yeah, there's other issues with Chris Christie as well, but that one right there, that should put the final stake in the coffin right there. Adi Amar says grandstanding hypocrite. He's just as contemptible. I agree. Absolutely. And of course, what was Trump's response when you got a guy there talking about his crime family, grifting people? What did Trump respond?

He made fun of Chris Christie's weight. This guy is, Trump is just juvenile, just juvenile. He doesn't even care about this. He just dismisses it. He says, I don't think anybody knows what he's talking about there. Yeah. But then Chris Christie was saying, Trump has made the country smaller, smaller in every way.

He said, smaller in the way that we talk to each other, smaller in the way that we look at each other, smaller in the things that we talk to each other about, smaller in the issues that we cared enough to get angry about. Barack Obama made us smaller by dividing us and trying to make sure that his party was divided into smaller pieces so that he could lead the small pieces that he wanted to. And Donald Trump made us smaller by dividing us even further

and pitting one group against another. Different groups pitted against different groups every day and by definition making those groups smaller. And so I absolutely agree with that. He's absolutely right about that. I talked about how disturbing it was when Obama was running back in 2008, this personality cult that he was getting around himself. And I thought, wow,

you know, these Democrats, boy, they're awful. But then the same thing happened with Trump. He built this massive personality cult. And that does divide us. And it's very concerning and disconcerting to see that people on both the left and the right are falling into these personality cults. And so Trump's response was to say, how many times did Chris Christie use the word small? It's an uppercase. Small. Does he have a psychological problem with size? Actually, his speech was small.

Not very good. It rambled all over the place and nobody had a clue what he was talking about. Oh, I think we know exactly what you were doing with pardons, Trump. The biggest white-collar criminals getting off, I wonder what he was expecting, to get paid before or after the pardons. And why doesn't anybody look at that? Then you have Mike Pence come out.

He announced, and as the Associated Press says, he unleashed a sharp attack on Trump. Yeah, you know, both Pence and Christie, again, they're angry at Trump. They've both been hurt by Trump. But, you know, the thing I don't get is that the public has been hurt even more than Pence and Christie by what Trump did in 2020. We've been hurt more by the lockdowns, by the bankruptcies, by the debt that he put us into, the personal bankruptcies, the people being driven out of business with his lockdown, the people who were killed by his jab, the elections that were corrupted by his lockdown election, the public has been hurt far worse than Pence or Christie. And they've got, they're very angry about this.

Why aren't we angry about this? Why are we following along with Trump still? You know, the vast public cannot connect the dots. They don't understand who did this to them. Oh, it was bad Democrat governors, I say. Bad Democrat governors who are being paid by Trump to do exactly this in the same way that the federal government always pays people to do what. We want you to put boys in the girls' bathrooms. And if you don't do it, we're going to take that massive amount of money that we've

been giving you on an annual basis. We're going to pull that back. So you better start doing that. Pence comes out and says, I believe anyone who puts themselves over the Constitution should never be president of the U.S. And anyone who asks someone else to put them over the Constitution should never be president of the U.S. again. So the problem is that Pence never had a problem with Trump putting himself over the Constitution and funding and producing this lockdown and this jab. All that was unconstitutional.

He was a cheerleader for all that. Probably still is, Pence. He's just talking about this in terms of what happened on January the 6th. He called January the 6th a tragic day in the life of our nation. He said Trump's words were reckless and endangered my family and everyone. Well, yeah, what about these January the 6ers? Do they understand how they were betrayed? How they were thrown under the bus?

For what? For money? For a grift? That's what Stop the Steal was that was run by Alex and the rest of them. That's what Trump's Save America was. These guys made tens of millions of dollars. In Trump's case, he made $250 million after the election with that grift. Anyway, Pence said, President Trump also demanded that I choose between him and the Constitution.

Now voters will be faced with the same choice. I chose the Constitution, and I always will. Just so sad to see all of this, you know? In the same way that when you had the Tennessee Three and their insurrection on the floor, they get a bullhorn and they take over the floor. What was the point of that? What was the goal of January the 6th?

What was Trump and Alex, what was their plan in Roger? What were they trying to do? Did they want to have something like we saw in Tennessee? Did that accomplish anything there? As one of the other Tennessee legislators said to these legislators who took over the floor, hey, you're a legislator. You got a problem? File a bill.

Well, Trump had collected $250 million, and he didn't really do anything to push back against it. He just kept pushing people towards this insurrection type of thing. If you want to call it an insurrection, of course, then the Tennessee thing was an insurrection as well. But he didn't want to file a bill. He didn't want to file a lawsuit. He didn't want to show the evidence. He didn't want to put together a case.

He didn't want to take it to the state legislatures that were Republican-controlled with Republican governors that he had narrowly lost, that he could have come up with another slate of electors, and then that would have presented a situation. Well, does Pence recognize the legislators that were sent, the electors that were sent by the legislature, or the ones that were sent by the governor?

And they had a pretty good case that you should go with the ones that are done by the legislature, because the Constitution said the legislatures will determine the rules but then that would have been a process that he could have done something with thomas massey said the same thing he said they didn't give us anything to work with you didn't have any state where you had uh anybody sent by the state government has to be sent by somebody in the state government have to be sent by the legislators because the board of elections was under the executive branch if the legislators had heard and had presented to them evidence then they could have sent something else and it could have kicked that off anyway pence emphasized he was incredibly proud of everything else that was done in the trump

administration he doesn't have any problem pence doesn't have any problem with anything that was done in 2020 disqualified absolutely He said, yeah, we had the GOP tax cuts for the very, very rich. We confirmed three conservative Supreme Court justices, and we have a lot of great justices that we put on the bench, you know, like that great Trump-appointed judge in Tennessee who just decided that he's going to allow, uh, drag parties with kids.

And the Tennessee law is not constitutional. He shut that thing down. That's a Trump judge who did that. A Trump judge who said to the drag Queens party on dudes. It's all cool. Right? Uh, so, uh, Pence doesn't have a chance because the MAGA people hate him. And his only chance would be if something changed their mind about Trump.

But of course, because they're going to make a martyr out of Trump with trumped up charges, that isn't going to happen. Now he had RFK Jr. go down to the border, which is something, like I said, Biden and Lala have never done. Very few Republican candidates have taken any interest in that either. This is what he said when he went to the border at 2 a.m. in the morning. Hey, everybody, I'm at the border wall around Yuma, Arizona. It's about 2 o'clock in the morning.

We've watched about 150 people come across. You can see the end of the wall down there. And we've watched about 150 people come across in the last hour. The first group were about 50 or 60 people from Africa, from West Africa. This group that is filing behind me right now, we interviewed many of them. They're from Peru, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, China, Tibet, Nepal. And all together, people have come across right here from 117 nations in the last couple of years. In three years, in total, 7 million people have come across the border illegally into our country and from here they're put on these buses and they're brought

to the Border Patrol station where their process after four or five days they're released on their own reconnaissance into our country and most of them are never seen or heard from again and this the stories that we heard from these people are absolutely heartbreaking. This is a humanitarian crisis because of the understanding across the globe that we now have an open border here. There are people being drawn here. They're being abused. There's all kinds of just horrific, terrible, terrible terrible stories and this is not a good thing for our country it's not a good thing for these people and it is unsustainable well that is good if he can get the democrat street you know the rank and file democrats

if he can get them to understand what this is really about. And of course, we've even seen Governor Newsom in California. We've seen the mayor of Denver, other Democrats, Chicago, New York. We can't handle this. And they're only getting a small part of what's coming in. Of course, California is getting more, but it is overwhelming them. He says, the understanding across the globe is that we now have an open border. These people are being drawn here. This is not a good thing for our country. As he pointed out, it's a humanitarian crisis. That's right. But see, they're being drawn here. What is drawing them here? The welfare state. The welfare state that I don't think, certainly not RFK as a Democrat, is going to do anything to pull it back. It's the great society. It's now the great global society.

And, of course, Cloward and Piven said, you know, we really want to bankrupt this country. It's not doing it quickly enough just having an entitlement welfare state in America. So let's pull people in from all these other places and we'll be able to take it down. It is a plan. It is a deliberate plan to take us down.

After four or five days of processing, they're released on their own recognizance into our country. Most of them are never seen or heard from again. He also met with local farmers in the border community. He said Yuma County provides 90% of the green leafy vegetables like iceberg lettuce, arugula, spinach, broccoli to American tables between November and April. He said the tsunami of migrants who are walking across the farm fields and defecating in irrigation canals threatens the safety of that food supply. Last year, one of their neighbors had to plow under 88 acres of broccoli and personally absorb the $10,000 per acre cost.

So that is nearly a million dollars. That's $880,000 that it cost him. Because the people are coming across the border and literally taking a dump in the water, creating a health issue, tainting the irrigation water. That's the reality of this, you see. And this is the kind of Soros chaos, Cloward and Piven chaos. This is intentional. Kennedy, who is pro-choiceice has attempted to court some right-wing votes with promises to close the border if he becomes president uh again you know he's got to

get the democrat nomination first i think he is clever in the way that he is presenting this to the democrats uh and hopefully it'll work they need to understand this is a problem democrat leaders understand it's a problem they don't care uh democrat They need to understand this is a problem. Democrat leaders understand it's a problem. They don't care. Democrat voters need to understand it's a problem. So, as I point out, Biden's people have said, hey, his age isn't a problem.

It doesn't matter how many times he falls down. Well, I said, worryingly for the Biden campaign, only 33% believe that his victory would be a step forward for the country. The rest of them believe that it's going to be a fall down. It's re-nominated. Kennedy said the problem is solvable. We just need an administration that has the will to do it. So how does he solve the problem? He said it can be easily done. Everybody here is confident that it is manageable, but there is no will at the federal level. Again, how would he do it? I don't know.

He talked about all the people. You heard him say that 117 nations, people coming from West Africa, South Africa, Central Asia, other far-flung countries, 7 million people have come across the border illegally into our country in just three years he said so clearly it's not sustainable um and it is um humanitarian crisis he said there's a huge industry that's making billions of dollars for the cartels that are bringing in people 1.60 people came across from senegal and they're seeing advertising in their country, seeing the sanctuary city program. You see, it's the Democrats who are using the magnets to bring them in. We've got open borders.

You can go places like New York, Chicago, California, Denver, whatever they're going to, uh, just go there. They'll give you everything for free,

free phones, everything else. We saw this, as I mentioned in the UK, had a bunch of people who'd come in from Africa. They were putting them up in a hotel in London, and they were not happy with the accommodations. I looked at the hotel, and it's like, well, it's much nicer what Karen and I stayed in when we got married. We didn't have any money. We got in the country legally,

but we wound up staying in. we had to ration our resources. It was before we had started working and we got married and said, let's just go to England and hang out for a couple of months. And that was my idea. Karen gradually came along and, uh, we lost so much weight that we could, uh, had to wear all of our clothes at the same time so that, so that there was a, we could get the pants, uh, tight enough to keep them up. But, uh, I mean, we really, uh, got down to skin and bones because couldn't afford to eat. It was very expensive in 1980. Uh, the dollar was very weak after Carter. And, um, it was one of the lowest points that had ever been.

So we couldn't afford anything. And we stayed there for a long time. So we went in our accommodations. We didn't get to stay in a hotel as nice as these migrants who are, they were so angry to make a point. They went out and camped on the street and they're texting everybody with their cell phones and all the rest of the time. We need better accommodation and all the rest.

I mean, it's like, talk about spoiled. But we didn't, we went out into the suburbs and we commuted in by train to try to save money because we couldn't afford to even stay in London. And we couldn't afford a hotel. And so it was a house that had been really big and they had subdivided it into different sections and um would rent out the different rooms as separate things and so you know you could have an apartment you could have a flat which is smaller and we got a mini flatlet you have an apartment a flat a flatlet and a mini flatlet and so we got like the smallest one we had the middle of January. We had the heater that we had was a hairdryer that you could put quarters in. There were like 10 pence pieces. You could put quarters in to get your electricity going.

You know, there's an individual meter that ran off of coins in each room. And it was freezing cold and super tiny. But we had a good time. But, you know, I guess we should have taken their approach and protested out on the street and say, I demand better free stuff given to me. Biden said the Department of Homeland Security was guilty of, I'm sorry, not Biden, but RFK. They said Biden here, but Breitbart got that wrong. RFK said they're guilty of extreme malpractice. He said, I am shocked that Alejandro Mallorca is still in office.

Asked about the border wall, he said, well, the border wall clearly works in places. This is an interview also that he had with Breitbart. Now, they didn't ask him, you know, so how do you fix this? So will the border wall fix it? You know, well, you know, Alejandro Mallorca's got to go. Biden doesn't care about this. He's got to go. Well, what do we do to fix this?

Does the wall work, they said. Kennedy said it would clearly work in, that it clearly works in places, and it should be completed where building materials have already been bought. He's not going to put any more money into it. But right now, they just stopped construction. They bought materials. So he said, you know, put it up. It'll be a nice thing for people to see it.

However, here's the however. He believes that there are sections that could be protected without interfering with the environment. With the environment. See, he's still a crazy greenie. RFKJ is. Don't put the wall up where you're going to interfere with the environment. And we're going to have to include wildlife corridors. Well, here's what I would suggest that RFK Jr. calls his holes in the wall.

His wildlife corridors. Maybe he could call them coyote doors because that coyote has a double meaning, doesn't it? The human trafficking smugglers as well as the four-legged ones. Yeah, so I would just say to them, forget the wall. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down the welfare state. The welfare state is the magnet. And if you can't stop the American welfare state, at least stop the welfare state for people coming from 117 different nations. Every nation on earth.

We cannot have a welfare state that gives a free ride to every person on earth. And they don't have to comply with any paperwork nothing at all which is actually you know even more stringent than what happens with the american welfare recipients at least they got to fill out some paperwork prove their identity these people don't have to they just get it he appeared with the yuma arizona mayor who is a republican he said this should not be a partisan issue it should not be a partisan issue it should not be an issue that falls on these small municipalities or ultimately on these immigrants. And then crushing social services in New York and Chicago and other places.

It is a federal problem. And again, he's not going to do anything about the magnet that is drawing people in. The magnet that is drawing people in. The magnet that is drawing people in, the welfare state. And don't expect him to change that. We'll be right back. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we have some comments here.

Angus Mustang says, All the grifters want to be the top dog in the district of criminals. All these garbage eating politicians feeding from the trough of corruption that is stocked by the federal reserve. You're absolutely right. Uh, Brian, Deb McCartney by 2 a.m. A 2 a.m.

Stunt by RFK J just a political stunt. Yeah. Why would he go there at 2 a.m.? Um, anyway, um, yeah, nothing is going to be done.

He's not going to address a central problem. Uh, the central problem is, uh, you know, anyway, um, yeah, nothing is going to be done. He's not going to address a central problem. Uh, the central problem is, uh, you know, yeah, the federal government is the problem. Biden is the problem and Mallorca is the problem. Well, no, we have some policies that they have. What about those policies? Which of those policies are a problem? And you're going to build a wall, but you're going to leave coyote doors open. Uh, Angus Mustang had the people from Afghanistan walk to the Southern border. problem. And you're going to build a wall, but you're going to leave coyote doors open.

Angus Mustang, how did the people from Afghanistan walk to the southern border? Yeah, they were sent there by NGOs, by Soros and these other people, take them down into Central and South America to the appropriate country because, you know, other countries do have immigration laws and they enforce them. What's the big deal about that? You know, this whole thing has been this political football. Breitbart loves to talk about it. I don't like to talk about immigration because the solution is very obvious. And everybody's just using this to virtue signal. These are situations that, you know,

clearly both sides want this to happen. And they're not going to do anything about it. If you go back and look at DACA, for example, that was the Obama administration with an executive order saying, we're not going to enforce the law. That's what it was. We're not going to enforce immigration law. We're going to defer action.

In other words, we're not going to enforce the law. And then Trump comes in. Well, that was an Obama executive order. Trump could have changed that, but he chose not to. Instead, what he did was he said, well, I'm going to challenge that in court. Why would you do that? Except for the fact that you don't want to take action. And so that's what he did. You know, he kicked it over to the Supreme Court so he didn't have to take any responsibility. Pretended that there was nothing he could do about it. And, you know, we've seen that same type of thing being done by DeSantis over some of these vaccine issues.

And things, well, let's kick it to, let's have a committee that is set up. Maybe we can get the Supreme Court of Florida to do something about this or that. They all play that game. Damage says, Kennedy surprises me pleasantly more and more. He's doing a lot of what his dad did before they shot him. RFK Sr. used to travel to problem areas of the country to shine a light on different problems. Yeah, and he remembers that. He was nine years old and went with his father when he did that. Uh, so it is, um, uh, I like the fact,

I like what he is saying about some of these issues, whether or not he would ever do them, if he got elected or not, there's of course another issue. And, um, and I said, when I talked about what he said about gun control stuff, uh, again, you read through the lines, he's still for gun control. He just says, let's not have a civil war over this and let's do something to protect the kids first. Do you realize how the kids are being affected by SSRIs? And why are we now having this when we've had a lot of guns in the past and this never happened? And so he shined the light on SSRIs and good for him. I applaud that. I'm glad that he did that. I'm glad that he went there to talk, you know, to show Democrats that it's a problem at the border. This is a key thing.

Like I said before, it's important to talk about things that nobody else is talking about, like the SSRIs and how they're damaging and hurting people. And it's also important to have somebody who's not simply Republican talking about the border, somebody who's not simply Republican talking about CBDC, but he has to win the Democrat primary. And he's getting a lot more press from, uh, from Republicans than he is from Democrats. So we'll have to see what happens with that. And then of course, that all presumes that you're going to have an honest counting of the votes, which I don't believe in a second. Uh, I believe that's where they have an honest counting of the votes, which I don't believe in a second. I believe that's where they'll get rid of him.

I hope they don't kill him. I don't want to see anybody get killed, even if I wouldn't vote for him. And I don't want to see, it's like I don't want to see any abortions. And yet, he's not with us on that issue either. Let's understand. Lone Wolf says, I hope they let Kennedy live long enough to swing some voters his way. And Cloward and Piven's strategy is alive and kicking, and kicking our behind. Aaron Moss said, when I said I couldn't afford food in Britain, he says, well, that's fine.

British food sucks anyway. You're right. But you know what they do have that is really good? And I think we put on a few pounds just smelling the bakeries. You know, they had some, literally we would stand there and, you know, smell the food as we're wasting away. No, we had a good time. We did a lot of free stuff, did a lot of walking, and went to a lot of free museums and that type of thing. So, yeah, exactly right.

Let's talk a little bit about Sodom. Sodom and Gomorrah. The cheese pizza. Meta's Instagram facilitated massive pedophile network. And folks, this is much bigger than just they didn't take it off quickly enough. They're actually recommending this stuff to people and this is a report that is now being done by the wall street journal so now you can believe it right now you can believe that they've got pedophiles and that they have uh pete's uh euphemisms so uh the instagram's own algorithms were promoting pedophile content to other pedophiles,

while the pedos themselves used coded emojis, such as a picture of a map or a slice of cheese, pizza, that type of thing. The pedophile accounts, says Wall Street Journal, on Instagram mix brazenness with superficial efforts to veil their activity, researchers found. Certain emoji functions as a kind of code, such as an image of a map shorthand for minor attracted person, M-A-P, minor attracted person. Oh, so we'll put up a map. Or cheese pizza, which shares its initials with child pornography. So Instagram allowed these pedophiles to search for this content

with explicit hashtags, such as pedo-whore and pre-teen sex. Sellers of child porn often conveyed the child's purported age, saying they were on chapter 14, meaning they were 14 years old.

Or they would reverse the age, and they would put a little mark on it to indicate that it was, that you reverse it. So instead of saying age 31, what they mean is age 13. It was a team of only three academics with limited access that found all this stuff. The head of the Stanford Internet Observatory and Meta's chief security officer until 2018 said, I hope the company reinvests in human investigators. Underage sex content creators and buyers

are just a corner of the larger ecosystem that is devoted to sexualized child content, says the Wall Street Journal. Yeah, that would also include Diz Gay from the woke Disney company. That would include all of Hollywood. It would include the government. It would include the schools. Yeah, it's just a corner of it, isn't it?

The social media stuff. All the mainstream media stuff is pushing it as well. You're not an oppressed minority if they're holding parades everywhere in your honor. If the government is holding parades in your honor, if the government is using the police to protect you in your parades, you're not an oppressed minority. Meta accounts for 85% of child pornography reports that have been filed with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Sarah Adams, who is a Canadian mother of two, has built an Instagram audience discussing child exploitation. Listen to what happened to her. Truly amazing. She said she accessed

one of these accounts, which was a collection of pro-incest memes that had more than 10,000 followers on Instagram. She said, I went there for only a few seconds and I tried to forget about it. But she said over the course of the next few days, she began hearing from horrified parents when they looked at her Instagram profile. She said they were being recommended, quote, incest toddlers, unquote, as a result of her just having contact with the account. So she goes to this incest account that's got 10,000 followers. She goes there for a couple of seconds.

This is disgusting. I don't want to even see that again. And because she just touched on it, now everybody that follows her starts getting recommended to look up incest toddlers. This is why I say, this is more than, oh, these people put this stuff up and they hid it from us and we don't know about it.

No, they're actively encouraging people to do that. I met a spokesperson said that incest toddlers violated the rules. Instagram had erred on enforcing that. Meta acknowledged to the journal, of course, we're talking about Meta, we're talking about Facebook, right? Acknowledged to the journal that they'd received a flood of reports of child sexual exploitation and failed to act on that, blaming a software glitch. And this is what they'll say.

They'll say, well, you know, it's just that artificial intelligence or something, you know, software glitch, or the AI went crazy. You know how AI is. We just, you know, put some computer programs in charge of some, you know, autonomous vehicles with weapons and just wiped out a large village. But yeah, it's just a software glitch. While Meta is allowing pedophiles to run rampant on its program, Zero Hedge says Zero Hedge is still banned.

And so am I, by the way. I've been banned by them for five years now. Wall Street Journal, again, is the source of this, but the research was done by Stanford University and the University of Massachusetts. As I pointed out, pedophiles have long used the Internet, but unlike the forums and the file transfer services that cater to people who have an interest in illicit content,

Instagram doesn't just merely host it, it promotes it with these things. Such accounts often claim that these are run by the children themselves. Isn't that interesting? Because, you know, when the kids are groomed in school, the teachers, administrators, and all the rest of them say, well, you know, this is the kids who are doing this. We're not doing it to them. We're not grooming them. And so you have these people who set up these pedophile accounts in the same way. They say, well, they're pretending that the kids are running this thing. Yeah.

Oh, and don't tell your parents, by the way. Whatever you do, do not tell your parents. So you have Revolver coming out and saying, well, look, Wall Street Journal has uncovered the Pizzagate pedophile network. Now, see, the problem is that these people get away with stuff when you start to add false details. And that's what happened at InfoWars. You add false details to the truth, and what that winds up doing is it protects the guilty. And this is the oldest trick in the intelligence community book.

Something gets out that they don't want out. And then they jump on it, promote it, but add false details to it that are easily debunked to say, well, none of this stuff was real. And so Revolver says, gee, it looks like the Q kooks were on to something after all. Well, here's another alternative explanation. No, maybe Q was providing cover for this after all. By setting it up in Infowars and other alternative media uh promoting this stuff to people and adding absurd details that they've done no research on that they couldn't prove that were easily debunked maybe that was what was happening you ever think about that

the parental rights group is warning the southern poverty law center to stop using the hate label but they said well actually it's just kind of a we're honored to be attacked by them and it's helped us to get a little bit of publicity but look as i said yesterday when we're talking about the new york times finally admitting that these ukrainians love hitler and it's a joke bablin b saying you know zielinski says it's russia that put those stickers on our helmets and our tanks and all the rest of this stuff we're not really Nazis it's Putin's uh no I said when I talked about that I said you notice at Southern Poverty Law Center they see Nazis everywhere they see right-wing extremists except in Ukraine right when we're giving them over 100 billion dollars of your money

and creating a war, those people who are literal Nazis, the Southern Poverty Law Center doesn't have anything at all to say about that. When it's our government that's not just supporting but arming literal Nazis, they've got nothing at all to say about it. But the parents said, well, they're pointing at us. We really don't pay that much attention to the Southern Poverty Law Center. Problem is that the FBI does, the Department of Justice does,

and they use the Southern Poverty Law Center to say, well, this is not coming from us. We're not attacking these people just because we don't like them and their politics or their religion. This is coming from the Southern Poverty Law Center. And they're independent, of course. No, they are the ones who give the FBI plausible deniability to do political persecution. That's why you should be concerned about it. So we have Miss California. Actually, a competition that is Miss San Francisco.

How fitting this is. See if you can get a picture of that article, a trans identifying man to compete and miss California pageant Monroe lace, a man who identifies as a woman didn't just compete, but one, one, the miss San Francisco pageant. I think that is very reflective of the community. There he is. That's a guy. There's another Dylan Mulvaney.

But hey, San Francisco, which is where Gavin Newsom came from, who was mayor there. He was pushing same-sex mirage and all the rest of this stuff before he became governor. But now this guy who just won Miss San Francisco is going to compete for the title of Miss California next month. I bet he gets it. But listen to what he had to say.

This is not just about his own personal fantasy. Oh, he likes to involve kids in his personal fantasy. This guy who just won Miss San Francisco. Every time I put on the sash, the weight of it reminds me of the weight of my job and the responsibility that I have to make a difference for young children, he told CBS. He's 25 years old and he visits a different elementary school almost every day. This guy is like the Johnny Appleseed of pedophile groomers. What does he do for a living?

He's got the time to visit, you know, put on all of his makeup and high heels and go visit a different elementary school every day? Who's giving this guy money? Is he getting funded by Soros? What's the deal? Lace can be seen reading Sparkle Boy, a picture book about a boy who wants to wear women's clothing. He can be seen reading that to a fourth grade class at tenderloin community

school. This is not the Babylon B tenderloin community school. Oh man. Uh, and in 2021, Catalina Enrique, another man identifying as a woman, competed in the Miss USA pageant as Miss Nevada. Does that ring a bell, Miss USA?

Who was it? Here's a Jeopardy question for you. Who was it that used to own Miss USA pageant? Oh, yes, it was Donald Trump until 2015. And then we got involved in politics that created a lot of issue. But up to that point, you know, I wonder when you look at this, what would Trump do about men competing in his Miss USA pageant. Would he be okay with that?

I think he'd probably give them an invitation to Mar-a-Lago, see if they'd campaign for him. Get out the LGBT vote, right? Yeah, there were a lot of accusations, by the way, at the time, of Trump barging in on women in their dressing rooms as part of that pageant. I guess they had a code when that would happen. They'd yell, Donald Duck! We'd start to come in there.

Babylon Bee, by the way, is saying, archaeologists uncover company rainbow logos from Sodom and Gomorrah. Israel. Archaeologists excavating the Jordan Rift Valley have uncovered what they believe are the rainbow logos used by companies to promote Pride Month in the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Samples have been sent to the University of Cambridge

for further analysis, and if verified, could prove to be one of the most obvious finds in biblical history. It's kind of big news that we found the exact location of Sodom and Gomorrah, they said, with National Geographic. But the quality of the artifacts we found also indicate a super perverted society of groomers, which was to be expected. Researchers have unearthed special edition LGBT wheels,

casks of pride wine, and rainbow-colored pottery vessels that once contained fig cakes. At publishing time, archaeologists also believe that they have found remains of Zoar, another one of the ancient cities of the plain in which Sodom and Gomorrah were a part. Unfortunately, the artifacts found are shockingly homophobic. And of course, Babylon Bee always will do things that take a little bit of a spin of a news article that comes out, right?

And here's the real thing, and I think this is what triggered them to do this article. Here's a real thing of somebody walking through the area of Sodom and Gomorrah. Take a look at this. This is truly amazing. And for those of you who are listening,

he's walking through this devastated area that is just, and you still have, it's burned and he can touch it and it kind of falls down, but you still have the outline of buildings that are there. Very clear, as a matter of fact. Considering the Bible describes this as being once like an Edenic area, you see nowadays it's just completely dead, as we are told happened to this place that was judged. Today it's completely dead. Nothing is growing here. The whole thing is like sponge. I really want to find one of those sulfur stones before the sun goes down. I really want to find one of those stones to show you.

This powder, but look at that. That's a building. You can still see the remnants of a building. That is not a normal shape. That doesn't look natural at all. Yeah. That definitely seems to be a man-made shape and

is this not enough evidence for people to find all of these man-made looking structures? Ashen remains crumble in your hands in the location where we're told in the Bible as a as evidence of God's judgment, as described by Josephus, historian, but then also finding circular, almost pure sulphur balls in the middle of the ash, in the middle of the walls and the shapes of the buildings.

Is this not enough evidence for us to see that A. the Bible is true and B. God is a just God and we need a saviour because sin requires punishment. Sin brings on the wrath of God and this place is the evidence of the wrath, the wrath of God, a holy God, who is righteous and true. And this place was very rebellious. And of course, very homophobic. Does not strike fear of God into the homosexuals, though.

The King James Bible has been banned in Utah schools over claims of vulgarity and violence. Well, you can see some of the evidence of the violence there. That's for sure. They said that they determined spokesperson for a committee for the Davis school district determined that the Bible quote does not contain sensitive

material as defined by the Utah Code, unquote, but they're going to ban it anyway. And this is based on one person's letter to the Salt Lake Tribune, said this is in response to a group of parents, Utah Parents United, saying we've got to get these graphic sexual books out of the schools of books that uh show minors depicted in sexual acts homosexual acts primarily uh so now they're going to pull the king james bible out women said well it's got incest it's got bestiality i not that i know of uh general mutilation probably talking about circumcision right not sterilizing somebody uh yes, it talked about rape. It mentioned somebody as a victim of rape, but it doesn't portray it there, really. So again, you know,

these are things that are portrayed in a negative light, not in a good light. And so this letter, this person wrote to the paper, said, get this porn out of our schools, all uppercase porn. A thinly veiled religious bigot. The woman also blasts the Utah Parents United, calling them, of course, white supremacists. I wonder what her politics are. What do you think? When asked specifically if the challenge of the Bible had any merit, Ken Ivory, who is somebody that I had, he's a state representative.

I talked to him many years ago, and he was talking about taking control of state resources, and he was kind of a Tenth Amendment kind of guy. I'm surprised to see him saying this. He said, well, I guess the schools have to burn some time and resources to determine if the Bible is porn. And since then, he said, well, their determination to limit the age appropriateness of the Bible should set a standard. The Bible has always been best studied around the fireplace by families where, you know, parents can give context to the warnings and the teachings that are in the Bible. Um, that ought to be what you do with education of all sorts, uh, do that around the fireplace

with the family. But yeah, he, uh, doesn't really think that we ought to be defending that. We have, by the way, and I haven't talked about this yet, Ted Cruz came out with a bizarre defense, or rather, attack on Uganda. Uganda is criminalizing homosexual behavior because they're afraid that it's going to go down the path that they see in America and in Europe. But they are talking about prison. They're talking about death sentences. That's something that we never did here in America for obvious reasons. But Ted Cruz,

because of Pride Month, decided that he needed to come to the defense of people. And he called it, he called it, what were the terms that he used? Horrific, wrong, grotesque, an abomination, a human rights abuse. And he had a pastor, Tom Askell, who took exception to that description. But when I saw it from Ted Cruz, I thought, why is he going abroad

seeking monsters to destroy? Don't we have enough monsters here with the LGBT and the pedophiles and the grooming and the drag Queens and the rest of this stuff? Why does he focus on the real problems? And as we've said over and over again, there's nothing in any of these laws, even though this is the way it's always portrayed. Whenever you try to protect children from these predators, they always say, you're coming after me. You're coming after my sexual practices and my fantasies. And it's like, well, if your fantasies involve children, yes, yes. But otherwise, we've always left them alone here in this country. And so the pastor got back to him, and he said, it called him out. Ascol has founder's ministry, he's a president, and he's calling for a return to conservatism

and the Southern Baptist Convention. He said, tell it to God, Ted. And then he quoted Leviticus, which condemned homosexuality, and then called for the death penalty. Ascol asked Cruz, was this law that God gave to his old covenant people horrific and wrong? Well, Cruz got back to him on June 5th and said, Pastor, I don't know you, but I honor your ministry.

Your biblical analysis is an error. Jesus told us to render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, to God the things that are God's. We're talking about the laws of man, not the Old Testament laws of God. Do you really believe the U.S. government should execute every person who is gay? And then he went on to say, you know, there's prohibitions for a child who disobeys their parents to have them taken out and stoned as well. And the pastor got back and said, and again, this is a red herring from Ted Cruz. Ted Cruz is pushing this out when this is not what anybody is really calling for. The guy said, well, so we're talking about God's law. We're not talking about our punishment for it.

He said, when God calls this evil, and I think what he should have done is he should have quoted to him from the New Testament, where all manner of sexual immorality is called out. But because this isn't something that just, well, we can forget about this because, you know, the Old Testament, the Mosaic law, which is not the law in America, and nobody is calling for that to be the law. But the people who built this country on Christian principles understood that. And so what he came back with was he said, well, I'm not advocating the death penalty for homosexuals, but he said, you're calling God's principles and laws

abomination. And, uh, and that is the key issue. We're going to take a quick break and we're going to join with our guest. Again, he is a part of a, uh, organization that defends the first amendment particularly. And, um, it is a first Liberty. And we're going to talk when he comes back about a Colorado law that they're challenging that blocks people from even speaking to anyone at an abortion clinic. Can they do that? Is that something that we can have laws that prohibit anybody from speaking in a public place like that? These places have become shrines to abortion, haven't they? We're going to take a quick break and establish contact, and we'll be right back. The Common Man The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children.

They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.

It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com All right. All right, joining us now is Roger Byron. He is senior counsel for the First Liberty Institute, and they're involved in a case right now in Colorado. I'm going to let him lay that out. He's been involved in a lot of cases involving

the First Amendment, primarily religious liberty cases. They've been very successful in a lot of these, but we wanted to get an update on this. This is not the FACE Act, which is a federal situation. This is something that's a little bit different, and this is a state law. This is not the federal government's FACE Act. So joining us now is Roger Byron. Thank you for joining us, Roger. Thank you, David. How are you? Doing good. Tell us a little bit about what's going on in Colorado. What are they doing around these abortion clinics to protect the abortion clinics from hearing any, the people going there from hearing anything? Well, let's lay a little groundwork first on how the First Amendment works, how free speech works. The government can't target

someone's private speech because of the content of what that person is saying. It can't target that person's speech because of that person's viewpoint. That is blatantly unconstitutional. The whole point of the First Amendment is that the government can't squash messages it doesn't like. And it can't punish the people that voice those messages because they're voicing those messages. That is free speech 101. Those are basic doctrines. And if we don't have that, we don't have free speech. That's right.

And that's why this case is so important, regardless of what people think about this particular issue, because this is metastasizing across our society. And we see it typically being done with surrogates. I see them as surrogates. I call them the deputized state that are out there doing these types of things. So the government doesn't have to say, well, we did it directly. But now you've got situations where the government is doing that directly. And I guess that's what's involved here in the colorado case right if colorado makes it a crime to be within a hundred feet of the door of an abortion center the law specifically says a health care facility but that is code word here for an abortion center you can't be within

100 feet of the door of one of those places and approach within eight feet of anyone for the purpose of counseling them or of educating them in any way or protest or even of handing them a piece of paper. So let me give a real world example here. It is a crime in Colorado to be within that hundred feet of the abortion center door and walk up to someone, hand them a piece of paper, whatever it may say. That is a crime in Colorado. The only way, the only escape from that crime is to somehow get that person's permission before approaching them and doing that. So you're standing out on a noisy street or sidewalk outside of one of these centers

and a sidewalk counselor may want to walk up to one of these women who look like they may need help or may want to have some more information. She cannot do so until she first gets that woman's permission. From far enough away, she effectively has to shout at her to even get her attention. Yeah. Wow. And what is the punishment if you violate that restriction? It was originally a misdemeanor. It's now a petty crime.

It could be anywhere from a fine to some amount of jail time. I guess it depends on what the court does. Wow. Wow. So you have a particular case, an individual who, was she testing this or was she just somebody that was caught up in the details of this? Our client, Wendy Faustin, has been a sidewalk counselor for many, many years in Colorado and the Denver area specifically. This law has made her job, her ability to compassionately and lovingly approach women outside of an abortion center to just see if they would like to hear of alternatives they may have

to what they're talking about or what the procedure that they're considering may be or if they want some additional help. She is effectively stopped from doing that in any way that makes sense or in any way that is effective. She first essentially has to raise her voice to the woman to see if she even has permission to come and talk to her. In no other situation ever is that going to pass muster under the First Amendment. That is blatantly and clearly violated of a basic First Amendment doctrine. And it was from the day it was put in place.

And what's most surprising, David, is that the Supreme Court said that's perfectly all right. Wow. And when did this law in Colorado, when did that go into effect? Sometime in the 90s, I think. And then it was litigated and made its way to the Supreme Court in a case called Hill v. Colorado. And the court decided that a law that clearly violates basic First Amendment doctrine

would be held up under the First Amendment. Wow. So where do we stand now in this case with Wendy, Wendy Faustin? What is the situation with it? Well, the case has just been filed. We've just filed a federal complaint or a complaint in federal court challenging these laws under the First Amendment, recognizing that there Supreme Court has ruled on this, what, 20, 30 years ago, with a different composition of the Supreme Court, you're going to give it a try again, just as we've seen the Supreme Court hold to Roe v. Wade for about 50 years and then overturn this decision.

We've had situations where the Supreme Court, with Andrew Jackson and the relocation of the Cherokee, they overturned themselves within one year of that. So these Supreme Court decisions are not engraved in stone. They can always be reconsidered. Is that essentially what you're working on? Hill has been roundly criticized as bad law from the very beginning. It was bad law when it was decided. It's bad law now.

Supreme Court decisions that he's handed down since Hill was decided make it was decided. It's bad law now. Supreme Court decisions that you've handed down since Hill was decided make it even clearer. It's just irreconcilable with basic First Amendment doctrine, with basic free speech principles. It is such a bad law, David, that last year in the Dobbs decision, the Supreme Court formally recognized that its abortion jurisprudence had distorted First Amendment law. And what was the poster child, the example they used of that distortion? Hill versus Colorado. Really? I was not aware of that.

I looked at it and I saw, you know, well, they're saying this is not our decision to make. We'll go back to the states. I was not aware of the First Amendment aspects of that in this particular case. So that makes a lot of sense as to why you would want to relitigate this. It looks like you might have an open reception. Yeah, there's basically two First Amendments. There is the real First Amendment that is usually applied to protect everyone's rights the way it's supposed to.

And then there's the other First Amendment, what the late Justice Scalia referred to as an entirely separate, abridged edition of the First Amendment. And it is applied largely when it comes to the rights of pro-life advocates. It has been a prevalent issue, not just in Hill v. Colorado, but in other decisions as well. So prevalent, in fact, that Scalia gave it a name. He called it the ad hoc nullification machine.

Yeah, that's true. They can shape this thing however they want to go after whoever they want with that. If you don't support across the board the principle of the First Amendment, then you can shape it really to be a weapon against people, can't you? Yeah, it's actually far worse than that. You know, one thing that Martin Luther King said I've always remembered is that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. And he was right about that.

Well, that applies to the First Amendment as well. I mean, if we have a group whose speech is disfavored and the government can squash that speech or make that speech nearly impossible, targeting that speech, then no one's speech is safe. That's right. And I think that's the thing that... It simply that depends on a, just, just a matter of time and a matter of who comes to power.

That's right. And that is not free speech. That's right. If free speech isn't enforced equally for everyone, then we don't have free speech. That's right. Yeah. That's the thing I think everybody needs to understand when they look at

these measures and you know, what is the principle that's trying to be involved here? And if we violate that principle, your time in the barrel is going to come around. And that's what people don't think. They think, well, now our group is on top and we're going to call the shots and we don't really care about the Constitution. The Constitution was there to protect you when the people who don't like you get in power. That's the key thing about this. Tell us a little bit about your group.

Well, before we leave this case here, tell us a little bit about your group. Well, before we leave this case here, tell us a little bit about, is this now just getting started? And what is the process? And, you know, you started a local level, I'm sure, at some place to file this appeal. What is the process to get it up to the Supreme Court? About how long is that going to take, that fight? Well, you could never put a time limit on things like this. It doesn't quite work that way. We're just at the very beginning stages of this lawsuit. We filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

And we'll have to wait for that process to occur and see what the court does. I'd like to give another example, David, of how this law would work, is how extreme it is. Under this law, you could walk up to a woman outside of an abortion center within that 100-foot radius and approach her and say something like, you know, I support abortion. I think it's a good thing. And that would be completely fine. You could approach the same woman outside of the same facility and say, you know, I don't support abortion. I don't think

it's a good thing. I think it's a bad thing. That is a form of protest. And that would be a crime under this law. Wow. Wow. That truly is amazing. Yeah. As you have said, this is about viewpoint discrimination. And we're going to censor what you have to say. We're going to construe that as hate speech. Is that what the justification? Did they try to come up with any justification for this thing when they put it through?

They weren't even talking about hate speech back in the 90s, were they? This is simply about protecting abortion. That's what it comes down to. Yeah. It comes down to trampling a person's rights, you know, to do anything possible, you know, to put a huge bubble around this infamous procedure. Yeah.

It truly is amazing how this has become like a shrine, you know, in so many different ways to these people. Um, and you have to ask yourself, whenever we look at censorship, a denial of free speech, uh, it always is the people who have something to hide that are trying to shut down the speech. You have to wonder what they are concerned about. If, uh, they don't want somebody to just hand them a crisis pregnancy center card or say, hey, if you got some issues with some people here that would be happy to help you. It is truly amazing how jealously they guard their ability to do abortions. It truly is amazing. Tell us a little bit about it.

Yeah, go ahead. If these laws, I mean, if these laws hindered, say, climate change advocates or anti-war protesters, they would be struck down instantly. Yeah. The reason they were upheld is because of this ad hoc notification machine that Scalia called. That is true. Tell us a bit about your organization, some of the other types of things that you've been involved with. And is this an organization that people can contribute to in order to help you do these types of trials? Well, certainly. I mean, to learn more about what we do, the best way to do it is to go to firstliberty.org.

It's firstliberty.org. I'm senior counsel at First Liberty Institute. And we focus explicitly and not only on religious freedom issues. That is usually under the First Amendment, can be under other federal laws or state laws. And we advocate in the courts both on behalf of students and teachers, on behalf of religious institutions, on behalf of those in the military, on behalf of the workplace, and just the public arena in general.

Tell us a little bit about some of the types of religious cases that you've been involved with. Well, just last year, we had two major wins at the U.S. Supreme Court. One was Kennedy versus Bremerton School District. We represented Coach Joe Kennedy, the football coach who was fired for taking an E after football games on the 50-yard line. I remember that case. I covered that case a lot. I didn't realize that was you guys. Well, that's great. Absolutely. Actually, that is a landmark case now that completely changed the landscape for establishment clause matters, for separation of church and state

matters. For 50 years, the test that the Supreme Court would apply, primarily the Lemon test, as it was called, and the tests that grew out of that were very hostile to religious freedom in general. And under Kennedy, under our win last year, the court says now the test is to supply historical understanding and the original meaning of the constitution, you know, to, to look at history and tradition and the understanding of the founding fathers to determine what may or may not be a violation of the establishment law and what may or may not separate,

what may or may not violate the idea of separation of church and state. Yeah. It's an objective, very pliable standard now. That's really good and of course all this stuff about people exercising their religion being misinterpreted as the establishment of religion that didn't really come about until the middle of the 20th century that was a novel idea at that point in time wasn't it wasn't that about when that happened well we've had the establishment clause in place obviously from, from the beginning. But back in the early to mid-20th century, it began being used more as a weapon against religious freedom than as a shield against government encroachment upon free exercise. That's right. Yeah.

Originally, establishment meant that you had to pay an official state religion or you had to attend church or some combination of those types of things. And then they started making it about, well, you just can't. If you're a person that works for the school system, you can't show your religious beliefs or exercise your religious beliefs in any way, shape or form, as Coach Kennedy was doing, quietly going out and praying on the 50-yard line after a football game, right? Yes, and also currently right now, David, we have a case at the U.S. Supreme Court. We represent a man named Groff, who was an employee of the U.S. Postal Service, and he is a sabbatarian. It's his religious conviction that he did not work on Sundays, which is one of the main reasons he went to work for the U.S. Postal Service, because they generally he not work on Sundays, which is one of the main reasons he went to work for the US Postal Service because they generally don't work on Sundays.

But the US Postal Service in recent years has taken a contract or contracts with Amazon or different online carriers and have begun requiring people to work on Sundays. And our client Gerald Groff was asked to do that. He explained his religious convictions and was given an accommodation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, like he should have been. Then he wanted to work on Sunday again, and he decided to transfer to another post office where he wouldn't have to do that, but he was ultimately fired because of his refusal to work on Sundays, his inability to do so, where he'd already been accommodated, you know, as the law require, uh, he brought suit against the postal service.

And we brought that matter to the Supreme court and, uh, we're awaiting the decision now and hope for a good result there. So it's already been argued before the Supreme court is waiting for them to publish the decision. Um, any expectations as to when that's going to be? I don't know what the court's schedule is. Are they in session now? Is there some point when they start to release these decisions? Well, we hope to hear sometime this summer.

This summer, okay. Well, that's a very strong case for religious liberty. I think very clearly, as you point out, they're given accommodation, and then they change their mind about that. That looks like that should be a win for religious liberty. I think very clearly, as you point out, they're given accommodation and then they change their mind about that. That looks like that should be a win for you guys. I certainly hope so. Any other interesting cases that are out there? Those are two big cases. Those are the two biggest ones we have right now. Well, it certainly is interesting to see what is happening there, and I really do appreciate what you're doing. It's very important.

People need to understand that this is bigger than the individual issues involved here. You know, whether we're talking about somebody praying silently or being forced to work against their religion, or we're talking about the abortion. This is bigger than those issues because it's going to affect everybody everywhere.

And it's going to affect people that are on the opposite side of this issue if we lose those fundamental protections that protect us all. Give everybody your website one more time, First Liberty there. Again, we're First Liberty Institute at firstliberty.org, F-I-R-S-T-L-I-B-E-R-T-Y.org. Firstliberty.org. Great. Very good talking to you, Roger. Good luck.

We'll be keeping an eye on these cases. I certainly hope that you're successful because certainly the First Amendment, they've done everything they can to abridge and to destroy it. And we're hoping that we can claw that back, certainly with this Supreme Court. Thank you so much for joining us. Appreciate it. Thank you, Dave. The Common Man

They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose

what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Well, I have several comments here that people made about free speech. And I thank you for the tip, YJ72. Appreciate that on Rumble.

Our God, the created, is real. If you can't see or try to stay blind, Sodom and Gomorrah round two is coming. That footage is so powerful. Unfortunately, some still think that it's just a great story yeah that's a key thing key thing so for people to understand how grounded in reality um the hebrew bible is it truly is amazing as i said before about archaeology and uh the quote that he put up that he didn't read from josephus the jewish historian that was around at the time of Christ and wrote about the fall of Jerusalem

and the temple around 70 AD or what approximate dates. But he said, yeah, the remains can still be seen. You know, of course, here we are a couple of thousand years later, can still be seen. And it truly is amazing to see those buildings. Just as we always say, you know, when you look at a car, you look at a building, you know that somebody built that. And you can look at those ruins. And first of all, you can see still there, very clear building with the columns and all the rest of that stuff there. And you can see that someone destroyed it uh we have a virtual gypsy i stand in awe of all the work of most high they tried to act like a place that doesn't exist kudos to this man for showing this yeah absolutely yeah there is so much that even though as i said after

a couple of thousand years or even more because a lot of the events described in the Old Testament were centuries before the time that we now mark our calendar. So we're talking about maybe 3,000 years ago. And people would go there, they would find these events that are millennia old as archaeologists, but there's still a lot of places that have not been investigated because it's been off limits, because there are certain religions in control of those areas that do not want the Hebrew Bible validated. Free speech to the left is like being free to speak approved talking points and think approved thoughts. That's right. That's right. It says KWD 68.

Atomic dog. Free speech really doesn't exist any longer. As soon as the term hate speech started to become a buzzword 20 years ago, I knew we were screwed. Politically correct was another catchphrase that was a death knell. And of course, political correctness came right out of Marxism. And that's why they're talking about that. That was a clear dog whistle to what their real agenda was. And hate speech is a real source point with me as well. That's why I absolutely reject what DeSantis did in terms of criminalizing, making it a federal, not a federal, a felony to engage in hateful anti-Semitic speech.

The answer to bad speech is more speech. These people need to be defeated in the marketplace of ideas. They don't need to be locked up. All that does is legitimize them in a sense. As I said before, when you're trying to cover something up, it's usually because you don't have the information. You can't back up what you're saying. That's the way it's always interpreted. So if you want to shut down somebody who's out

there with hateful speech, genuinely hateful speech, then people start to look at this and say, well, why are they afraid to defend these lies that these people are putting out there? Aaron Moss, let's go to Colorado, identify as pregnant people, and get in their face. Audi MRR, abortion clinics or organ harvesting black market hub. That's right, absolutely. And it's our government who is paying for a lot of these things that they were, organs that they were harvesting out of California. But, of course, Lala Harris and then, you know, Javier Becerra, who's now head of HHS,

taking David Daleiden to court. And then throughout that ordeal that's been going on, millions of dollars in legal fees, years of struggle. And yet, because of that, they were able to get even more information. Information about the fact that it was the NIH, people like Fauci and Francis Collins, who were putting out the contracts, said kill a baby to get an organ of this age and condition.

Solocat, 1980. In Colorado, it's a crime to interfere with child sacrifice. That's right. It truly is a religious right for them. R-I-T-E. James Woods, when somebody asked him, you know, just how evil is Hollywood? And the person said, James, serious question. As someone who has enormous respect for your talent as an actor, I'm curious, how evil is Hollywood? James Wood said, multiply your worst fears by 100. Wow. That's pretty much the case. It's pretty obvious to see this. And you know, the interesting thing to me

about Hollywood that I was very surprised, there's an excellent series. I wish I could find it again because I've mentioned this once before. So I'll do it quickly here. It was a series called, I think it's called The Silver Screen. It's one of the reasons why I can't find it. Maybe some of you know where it is and you can direct me to it. It was a documentary series.

I think it was done by the BBC and had James Mason as the narrator. And they looked at all different aspects of the very beginning of the movie business. Its movement from New York to California, because why? Well, they didn't have very good artificial lighting at the time. And it wasn't just when there's massive fires in Canada or whatever

that everything would get hazy. So they could only operate on certain days. And they found that if they went to California at the time, it wasn't industrialized, but lots of sunlight. Didn't rain very frequently. And so the whole industry moved out there. That had a lot to do with the fact that they started doing cowboy movies because there was a lot of real cowboys that could pull in to do stuff. But it talks about that. It talks about the cameramen and how they would,

with these hand crate cameras, how they would keep them at a set tempo. They all had a song that they would memorize and they'd kind of sing that in their head and turn. And they would do that even if they had them strapped to a biplane, they would still be doing that kind of stuff. All kinds of interesting stuff about how they would actually, all of their special effects, they would actually have to do them. Lillian Gish is on an ice floe. Well, Lillian Gish was on a real ice floe when she did that. I mean, they didn't duplicate that with styrofoam in a backlot river or anything like that.

They did that kind of stuff. And so it was a fascinating documentary. One of the things that was fascinating about it was just how corrupt Hollywood was from the very beginning. You had people like Fatty Arbuckle. I mean, you don't talk about evil and stuff like that. Sexual harassment and the Epsteins. I mean, it was all there.

And so one episode they talked about, they didn't get into the gritty details of things in that regard. But they gave you an idea of just how bad Hollywood was. It's one of the reasons why the federal government came in and said, we're going to have the Hays Code and you're either going to police yourself or, well, they didn't come in with the Hays Code. They said, you're going to either police yourself

or we're going to do something about it. Don't make us come down there type of thing. And so Hollywood came up with a Hays Code and that lasted into the 50s. And you saw that evidenced in things that you would see on TV where if you had a husband and wife and they're in the bedroom, one of them's got to have a foot on the floor at all times, you know, that type of thing.

They'd have double beds and stuff like that, you know? Uh, so it was very strict code. And, uh, but before that happened, you had even actresses like Claudette Colbert, uh, when she did, um, uh, Cleopatra, you know, there was nudity and the early silent films and all kinds of debauchery that was depicted, but it was nothing compared to what was going on behind the scenes. So Hollywood has always been evil. And when you start and we stop and think about something that 100 years ago, the 1920s when this thing was getting off the ground, you look at how debauched and evil Hollywood was.

All kinds of money flowing to these people. They're adulated everywhere they go. People are basically worshiping them. They have access to anything they want in terms of they get the money to buy anything they want, free access to sex and drugs and alcohol and all the rest of this stuff. That's been in Hollywood from the very beginning. And think about how, as we've watched other institutions go downhill constantly think about hollywood that started out way down at the bottom of the hill and how much further down have they gone that's one of the reasons why i can certainly believe that when james woods says how evil is it well imagine your worst fears and multiply it by 100. Yeah, they're into some dark

satanic stuff right now, for sure. Target is not just doing the, uh, you know, the, the pride month stuff, but they're also supporting organizations that are pushing for us demilitarization and also pushing to shut down Mount Rushmore, calling it a symbol of white supremacy. You know, I got a video this morning from Bradley Dean. He has Sons of Liberty, and I've been fortunate to guest host on Sons of Liberty several times. He sent me a video where he lives. He's putting together a group of people to start boycotting Target. And so he put together a video where, where he lives. Uh, he's putting together a group of people to start boycotting target. And so he put together a video where he said, let's see what is in their pride section. And, uh, I'll, I'll try to describe this for the people who are, um, as he takes pictures

of the merchandise, I'll describe it for the people who are listening. And then he engages the manager of Target. Here's Bradley Dean. Target really quick and just see what they have as far as all this, what they call transgenderism clothing line and their satanic clothing line. And this is in Buffalo, Minnesota. So let's see what they got. All right, this is shots of the Pride section. Starts with Take Pride. Oh, here's a shirt. A woman, a cartoon woman on a pillow.

Busy thinking about girls, it says. Here's another one. Live, laugh, lesbian. All in rainbow colors. Ask me about my pronouns. And he scans down and here's a book, My Queer Year. I guess that's a diary. And then we see

a Pride book here where you have a family and all of the family is in Pride. You're in the most conservative county in the state of Minnesota promoting this. Yep. Really? How's that work now for you? I mean, me personally, I really have nothing to do with it. So. Okay. Well, are you just doing your job? Yes. Okay. So our laws condemn this in the state. You know that, right? This is against the law to promote this it's in the front it's in the back nobody

wants it in the county but you guys are selling it anyways and you guys have lost what eight billion dollars across the country already over the last week because of this and you're still not listening we don't want it here our stores are working on it oh i hope so because this is a perversion and a molestation of the minds of the kids. Okay? And it needs to stop. So I'll tell you what we're going to do. If we still have this stuff up in seven days, we're going to have about 100 people around the block protesting your store. So you can let your corporate know we're not putting up with it no more in the state.

We have our media relations number if you'd like to reach out. I'm just telling you, you go ahead and do whatever you want to do, but I'm not putting up with that. The people in this county do not want it here. We already know. We're already here. Yeah, well, good. I hope they do push back against that.

There's just so many things that are happening, and we need to get involved. We need to raise people's awareness. If there's going to be some politicians who want to actually do something about that, that would be a novel approach. We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. We have a couple of comments about the Target thing.

YJ72, my local Target store removed their pride section. It was set up in late May, but now it's gone. I agree. Still an evil agenda company. Yeah. They've been pushing that kind of stuff from for decades. They've been pushing it. Um,

Georgia boy, uh, 1142. I'm surprised the price isn't six, six, six on those products. Go back and mark them all now on sale yeah the price is falling and so is our morality in this country yeah that's uh it's gonna be marked down for clearance uh paper has been duped by an ai generated op-ed piece that then retract the fact that they said a spray tan article

accusing Irish women of being racist. The Irish Times was fooled by an AI-generated opinion piece that criticized Irish women for using fake tans, animating that they were racist for doing so and calling it problematic. What this did was it confirmed the bias of the Irish times. Someone used chat GPT-4 to write the piece, then submitted it to the news outlet. It was titled Irish women's obsession with fake tan is problematic.

The author of the article used the fake name of Adriana Acosta Cortez and invented an identity of being a 29 yearyear-old Ecuadorian health worker from Dublin. The prankster then tweeted after the story was retracted and said, The Irish Times generally said that a once respectable news source has degraded themselves with such divisive tripe in order to generate clicks and traffic for their website. You need a better screening process than somebody just having a believable Gmail address. And so they confirmed that they had been duped

as part of the article that they got ChatGPT to write. And I'm telling you, if you want to write a woke article, it's the place to go. Just go to ChatGPT to write. And I'm telling you, chat GPT, if you want to write a woke article, it's the place to go. It doesn't go to chat GPT boy. It regurgitates all of the memes and the stereotypes and the hatred of the left. It's all right there. I despise that thing. Anyway, a fake tan represents, it said more than just an innocuous cosmetic choice. It raises questions of cultural appropriation and fetishization of the high melanin content found in more pigmented people. Yeah, this is something that was eagerly jumped upon by the pig minded people of the Irish times. When the person was finally tracked down, they admitted to submitting the fake story, said some people have called me an alt-right troll,

but I don't think I am. I think that identity politics is extremely unhelpful lens through which to interpret the world, they said. I made a semi-legitimate Gmail address with no numbers, and I also repurposed a Twitter account that I'd set up during COVID. I wiped it, and following some accounts and some news and some Ecuadorian outlets and some Spanish language to make it look legit.

There you go. Lay down your blueprint for what you want to do if you want to do it. You do your own hoax there. After that, the hoaxer allegedly used the AI image generator, DAL-E2, to create a fake profile picture of a woke journalist using the words overweight, blue hair, smug expression. Just the type of person that the Irish Times wanted to promote. The editor of the Irish Times then carped about how AI is a real challenge.

Yeah, it's not AI, but it's the DEI that is the challenge, the diversity, you know, what is it, equity and inclusivity. You have an AI-powered bots that are taking over the internet, mimicking human behavior, They say almost half of the traffic on the internet. Oh, are we going to worry about the power requirements of that? No, we're not. We're going to just go after crypto because crypto is the only thing on the internet that actually uses any power, all the stuff that's done by the bots, all the stuff that's done by, you know, these AI machines.

And do you realize when they've got 10,000 of these, um, yeah, Nvidia, um, graphics card machines that are out there, do you realize how much power that thing uses to go through this and they're running it around the clock? Yeah. Far worse than anything that anybody's doing with crypto or certainly equally as bad. And yet, no, we give that a pass. We give a pass to everything that the government does and all the information that is constantly being collected and stored on each and every one of us forever.

We're not worried about any of those power requirements. Yeah, the power concerns, the so-called climate concerns, are just as discriminatory as their free speech concerns. They warn that bad bots are those that send junk mail or steal data from people, make up 66.6% of the traffic. Well, there you go. There's your 666 again. Just shifted the decimal point a little bit. Instead of $6.66 is now 66.6% evil bots. And this is only going to get worse thanks to the new AI technology. And of course, none of that includes the government surveillance. They also talked about how the bots are used in cyber warfare. As much as 145% increase in attacks on Ukrainian web services in the early 2022.

True presence of online bots on social media was one of the major sticking points with Elon Musk and Twitter, of course. And, you know, he talked about how he's going to get out of the deal, and finally he's like, well, you know, bots are everywhere. We'll just go with it. Yeah, when we look at what is happening with AI, it's amazing that one company has actually come out with a camera that doesn't have a lens. I repeat that, a camera that does not have a lens. What it does is that you push

the button and it looks at your GPS coordinates and it sends it to AI and tells AI to make a picture for you of where it is. You don't talk about getting detached from reality. You're not going to actually get a real picture of what is there. You're going to get the what AI imagines is there. It's not even that it's going to be accurate. It's just, it's impression of what's going to be there. So you can live your life through the eyes and the mind of the chat GPT box or whatever it is that they're using, the AI that's there. I mean, it truly is amazing when you look at the insanity that is being fed to us. But you know, a lot of this stuff is high on symbolism and low on any reality of being able to actually do

what it appears to be doing. And you know, we talk about that all the time in terms of the artificial intelligence. But here's an example. This is coming out of Japan. It's a robotics company called Jizai that has come up with a strange robotic limb contraption that they appropriately call ARMS.

And as these people say, hey, look, they've built a real Doc Oct here, right? Dr. Octopus. And when you look at this, and they did this, this is a very artfully done film, but they strapped this thing on the back of this woman and she and another woman are dancing around and making these movements as the arm is making movements. No sense that she's actually controlling this thing. This is simply fake news. Somebody else is controlling these arms or they're doing their own thing and she's reacting to these arms. And although this is, you know, looks really bizarre and strange. There's actually

no practical purpose to any of this. And so they said their stated goal is more abstract than just having their arms pick up objects. It doesn't do anything practical like that. The system was designed to enable social interaction between multiple wearers,

such as being able to exchange arms with each other. Yeah, that's always what I... Good, nothing... Here she is now. They've expanded this. She's got not just two extra arms coming off of her back like an insect, but now she's got four arms.

And they're moving around. She's waving her arms to make it look like something is going on there. So they wanted to explore the possible interactions between digital cyborgs and a cyborg society. And quite frankly, I think that that is a really good example of how these tech people are kind of trolling us with a lot of what is happening with artificial intelligence. Yes, it does some things but there's a lot of imagination that is involved in this and so um yeah lending a

hand says my son yeah a couple of arms as a matter of fact uh jason barker the colorfulness of everything is clearly there to attract kids that's's right. That's a key part. You're absolutely right. It's a key part of what this rainbow stuff is about. Those bright primary colors from the very beginning, it's been about attracting the kids. And you know, I've thought about this. You know, of course, we're talking about Sodom and Gomorrah earlier,

you know, and if you stop and think about it, we're really on Earth 3.0, if you believe the Bible, right? We had God created the Earth, heavens and the Earth. It was very good, he said. Then Adam rebelled, and God cursed the Earth. So now we're in version 2. And then you had the events that led up to God destroying the Earth in the flood. And so now we're post-Diluvian.

Earth is now version three but the rainbow was there up to that point in time the bible says that god watered the earth in a different way other than rain mist went up through the ground that type of thing so um the rainbow was there it's a natural phenomenon but it's a natural phenomenon because of the rain. You know, it had not been there before. And it was a symbol from God about not destroying the earth again with water. One of the reasons why I'm not too worried about all this, besides the garbage science, I'm not worried about the climate narrative. Oh, we're all going to drown. The polarized caps are going to melt. No, God's already done that once. Next time he'll destroy it by fire.

But, you know, these people are taking the symbol that God made, a symbol of peace, after punishing the earth for sin and rebellion, they're taking that symbol of peace, that promise of peace from God, and they're using it in a mocking way in the rebellion. Isn't that interesting? Isn't that interesting? Geesebusters, thank you very much for that tip. I appreciate that.

Says, keep up the good work, David. Well, I appreciate that so much. And Georgia Boy, 1142, you want to see the bot world go on the White House Facebook page into the comments? Yeah, we got JetGPT working full time there to try to keep the real comments from surfacing at the top. And he also says about the robot arms, if you need that to dance, you shouldn't be dancing. Yeah, I guess maybe they need a few more legs too, don't they?

We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back with a little bit more about technology. We'll get into that when we return. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, you know, I've talked about how Spotify has become such a powerful website in terms of censoring podcasts. They've taken the lead in that. They've offered their technology to other people. But of course, now Microsoft has jumped into the market, the burgeoning market of podcast censorship with a couple of its own apps that are out there. So I took a little bit of dark joy in seeing that Spotify got busted in terms of bot-generated music.

You know, they pay a little bit of money to the people when somebody listens to your song. They pay the creators, the artists, they pay them a little bit of money. And so what happened was some people took an AI startup, has been generating music with artificial intelligence and then putting it on Spotify. So it's AI generated music. They put it on Spotify and then they have AI bots listen to the AI generated music in

order to get Spotify to pay them. I thought that was pretty interesting. It said roughly 7% of the songs uploaded by AI music startup Boomi, which generates tracks based on users' inputs. These tracks can then be shared on Spotify where they can generate royalties. So they had what they called artificial streaming when bot networks are listening, quote unquote, to these tracks to artificially inflate the number of streams. The issue was raised to Spotify by the record label Universal Music Group, which told Spotify

that the major streaming services, that all the major streaming services, there was something fishy about Boomy's numbers. So essentially, uh, one of these tracks that they generated used a cloned version of Aubrey Drake, Graham's voice, the label universal demanded that Spotify,

Apple music, and other streaming platforms remove the song. They said, this is fraud in a statement and so because this ai you know just goes out there and it mimics stuff right that's what it does when it writes things it's mimicking stuff that it finds on the internet when it starts talking about how uh it's gonna it loves humans or it hates humans and it wants to destroy the world or whatever it's just mimicking stuff that it's seen out there. And so it's going to mimic the music.

When it mimicked this particular artist that worked, or that had the license to his stuff at Universal, they noticed it, they flagged it, and said, you know, there's a lot of stuff like this is happening. That's what busted this scheme. Boomy claims that it has generated a whopping 14.5 million songs, which would be equivalent to 14% of the world's recorded music. Now, this is what is really sad about all this stuff. Like I said, you know, you look at what has happened to music. It started moving away

from live music. Then it started moving away from anybody really even creating music. They wanted to create visuals with MTV. They start sampling the music and repeating it. And now you've got bots that are recycling the music. And they're going to do the same thing with the visual arts, as I talked about a couple of days ago. They're going to get scans of the artists and of their voices and things like that. So we're just going to see the same people over and over again. I liked what Travis did with the thumbnail for that. Uh, he put out John Wayne as a CGI thing, you know, half, uh, uh, you know,

you could see the, the, the computer, uh, structure on one side of the face and John Wayne's face on the other one. I said, yeah, I don't imagine they're going to be redoing John Wayne. Somebody other than John Wayne, you want artists who receive only a minuscule amount of money from these streaming royalties in the first place. So the way you make this work is you get bots out there, you have them create the music and listen to the music as well. And then we have a new AI service that just like I was talking about,

you have a camera that doesn't have a lens and the AI imagines what it's seeing and feeds that to you. Now have a new AI service that can make fake photos of you hanging out with your friends and laughing and having a great time. So we've got fake bots. We've got fake news. We've got fake friends. We've got fake reality. Everything about this. So why wouldn't you think that the elections and all the media influencing and all the rest of this stuff is real? It's all fake. Don't want to spend time with other humans, but you still want to make it look like you're hanging out with your other pals? Who are you trying to impress, right?

Trying to impress the bots? I mean, what is the point of this? It really does get back to what is the whole point of social media, right? I think they conditioned everybody with this going back to the 90s when they started doing UK, they started doing Big Brother, right? Everybody living their life as an exhibitionist. And, oh, look at me. And that's really accustomed a whole generation to

that type of thing. And now you look at the generation, what is it, the one that comes after the millennials. It's like 30% of them are okay with having the government put a surveillance camera in their home, watching them all the time. Literally, 1984, Big Brother. You got about a third of them that are okay with that. Slightly less for the millennials. But both of them, like 20 to 30% of the people in those generations are okay with constant surveillance from the government in their own home. Just like 1984.

And then that falls to about 5% of the people above 45. It's kind of reverse of what, you know, the Rolling Stones, those people that don't trust anybody over 40. Well, the people under 40 now trust the government to an absurd extreme. But anyway, getting back to this story, imagine if MidJourney knew what your friends look like. Introducing Hotshot. Make photos with anyone in your

contact list doing anything. The results arguably leave a lot to be desired. They said the photos fall squarely in the uncanny value, making all the faces appear to be cartoonish AI interpolations. They're probably six fingers and stuff like that as well.

What is that about the six-finger thing? Anyway, yeah, go ahead and show that John Wayne picture that's there. There, there you go. That's the one Travis put together. And, of course, he used some AI artwork to do that because we don't have a lot of time to do this. But, yeah, he has to tweak it quite a bit. I can't get those kind of results.

So you start playing with those things. You start to learn the parameters and how to get what you want. He's very good at it. Harps, I hope you're doing well with your healing, your broken ribs. Says David Knight, it's called Hollywood, British TV series. Oh, okay, 1980, Hollywood, a celebration of the American silent film, not the silver screen. See, that's why I couldn't find it.

The Hollywood series. All right, I'm going to see if I can find that somewhere. I remember when I saw that, I really enjoyed that because, you know, I, I enjoyed the making actually did it for a while and she did make videos for a while. So I enjoy the technical aspects of it. I'm not a big fan of what they're doing now. I get to even tell you what movies are out there. I don't know any of the movie stars that are out there right now all the people I know that we're making

movies are retired or dead or have some kind of a physical condition where they can't do anything anymore but anyway yeah I'll check that out thanks for the information harps appreciate it that's it for today's program thank you for listening The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple,

unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com.