The David Knight Show - 8Nov22 Election, Sedition, Persecution, Civil War — The Next 2 Months After Last 2 Years

Episode Date: November 8, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESInfowars website staffer pleads guilty to storming the capitol. Alex Jones abandons and refuses to defend.2:15Equal treatment under the law? Leftist journalist John Sullivan and Trump supportive journalist Sam Montoya treated differently because of their politics.5:23The FALSE idea that journalism is EVER objective.11:55Sedition trial of Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers15:40Kroger must pay former employees $180,000 for attempted coercion against their religious liberty, then firing them32:49Canadian PPC Leader Maxime Bernie takes on the LGBT insanity without reservation35:36Why China’s marriage crisis is an “existential threat”. 44:24Trad wives and patriarchy and why it goes wrong in totalitarian societies48:15Bayer ordered to pay $275 million for brain damage caused by Monsanto’s PCBS — same people who brought you glyphosate (RoundUp)1:04:55Crime explodes in Ireland as migrants soar to 1/5 of population. Italian Prime Minister firmly refusing German NGO demands to off load migrants from ships dock in Italian ports1:07:21Listener comment on DNA, evolution & genetic modification vs. selective breeding1:11:48Election Officials Fear Counting Delays Will Help Fuel Claims of Fraud. And rightfully so. Why have computers and mail elections created chaos & corruption?1:15:39A county is being sued because they plan to count 100% of the ballots by hand.1:25:49Even though NY Gov Hochul is circling the drain, she can't give up on NO BAIL1:29:32New York City insiders say Mayor Eric Adams sees an opportunity to fight crime Hochul loses.1:33:05Reality imitates "Dr. Strangelove" down to the Russian "Doomsday" device (aka "Dead Hand") and American general pushing the idea that nuclear war is winnable1:42:55US nuclear forces chief says the war in Ukraine is a “warm-up” for the big one.1:51:51David welcomes Eric Peters.1:59:55If the left wins, what will be the determining factor?2:02:12The parallels between today’s election and 1860.2:09:59Voting is an existential issue for Dominion — but what about the country and election integrity?2:14:07BigPharma & BigBureaucrats retreat to the talking point: vaccines "Help Protect"2:24:13Evolution of private transportation and automobiles has gone into reverse. We're headed back to it being only for the elite2:28:39NASCAR: video of a guy trying to pull off a WALL RIDE, only done before in a video game, for the win2:37:43Even Pelosi attacker's mugshot is kept secret and hidden by the police. Why is that?2:56:08Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 8th of November, year of our Lord 2022, day 971 of the emergency. And the world's socialists are now calling for this stuff to stop. Even they've gotten tired of this. The people who love big government have gotten tired of it. Of course, they're only complaining about the profiteering side of it.

They don't see, as the blind spots are for both the extreme right and left, they don't see how they've come together. You have other politicians who say, or pundits who say, look at this, the Democrats don't have a plan to deal with this. Oh yes, they do have a plan. And they're executing it. And that's exactly why we're seeing the economy the way it is. So today we're going to take a look at the election.

We're going to take a look at world war, at civil war, the suspicion that could breed civil war. We'll have joining us in the third hour, Eric Peters. We'll talk about freedom and mobility. And we're going to talk about some of the issues that are brought up. Is anything going to change? Are they really going to talk about anything that has substantive issues in our lives? Well, we'll see. Stay with us. We'll be right back. Well, I want to begin today with the news, just the general news before I get into the election stuff, because there's something that hit very close to home, something that bothers me a great deal.

We had Sam Montoya. The headline is, InfoWars website staffer pleads guilty to storming the Capitol. I've known Sam for a long time. He was the cameraman that you've seen pictures of calmly walking between the velvet ropes as he was led in by the guards there with a camera filming, reporting. As a matter of fact, he was the only real journalist from Infowars there that day. The rest of them were involved in entertainment and the typical rab-rousing type of stuff that they've built their brand on. But he was actually doing reporting.

As I've said many times, what Sam did is what I would have done. A reporter goes to film what is happening. You don't run to the other side of town and hang out at the Supreme Court building unless you're concerned that you've done something. Sam went in without any guile to cover the story, but he did have a political position, and that's what he's being persecuted for. I interviewed Sam because he was running for office as well. I ran for, I think it was Congress.

I'm trying to remember what it was now. But in the primaries, he actually took it on and running for office as well. He ran for, I think it was Congress. I'm trying to remember what it was now. But in the primaries, he actually took it on and ran for office. He's got strong political beliefs. I don't agree with him supporting Trump at that point in time. January the 6th, it was way, way past Trump's sale date. As a matter of fact, the election in November was way past his sell date. He was stinking like a rotten globalist fish after all of 2020. What he had done with the lockdown, with the pandemic, with the lockdown election. It was his fault that he lost.

And it was his fault that nothing was done to do anything about the two Senate elections that were happening. And that happened on January the 5th, turning the Senate over to the Democrats. That's what Trump and his ilk had accomplished. But they did raise a lot of money for themselves. Sam did not do this for any reason other than he was a reporter covering it. And he had a MAGA cap and a couple of times. Woo. So what?

So what? How many times we saw Stephen Colbert and his crew sneak in and violate all of these rules, and they were given a pass. You think that they had a political point of view? You think they were trying to? Sam didn't do anywhere close to what Stephen Colbert's crew did going in, and they all just said, no, never mind. As a matter of fact, there was another left-wing activist

who was there filming. His name was John Sullivan. You remember that? He was also there filming when Ashley Babbitt was shot. Sam got some of that footage as well. John Sullivan was arrested. They said, well, you know, you came in here and you were whooping and hollering. And he goes, no, I'm a Black Lives Matter activist.

I was just doing that because I didn't want to get thrown out by these people. I was actually acting as an undercover journalist. So as a result, within a couple of weeks, they had an arrest warrant for him. They arrested him. And then he went before a judge, January the 15th, 15th, 2021, a year and a week or so later. And he was released as the authorities, according to Wikipedia, did not have sufficient proof to keep him in custody. And under the conditions that he keeps a job where he has to work full time, remains at home except to go to work, church or court, only posts to social media to request jobs, does not leave Utah, surrenders his passport

to authorities, does not work anymore with Insurgents USA, though still being allowed to handle its financial transactions and tax returns, et cetera, and as long as he doesn't possess firearms. Now, they put all these restrictions on him, but he did not go to jail because his politics were the right kind of politics. They had to do something. So, you know, don't buy a bunch of firearms.

This guy's a leftist. He's probably not interested in buying firearms anyway. So they put some things, don't do this, don't do that. We're going to restrict you for a short period of time. You know, you're on double secret probation, that type of thing. But they did not put him in jail. What are they going to do with Sam? Well, Sam Montoya faces a maximum sentence of six months imprisonment

after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor account of parading, parading, demonstration, or picketing in a Capitol building. He was let in there by the police, and he was filming as a reporter. What he did, as I said, doesn't come anywhere close to what stephen colbert's crew did they knew they were not allowed in and they essentially got around all the different regulations violations in order to try to get footage of conservatives or political enemies now the reason i mentioned this is because Sam was invited to Travis's wedding, was going to go to Travis's wedding.

But he called right before that happened, or just a couple of days before. Travis got married on October 15th, and Sam called and said, I've been fired. Now, one of Sam's conditions for remaining out of jail was he had to have a job and alex said don't worry i'm going to defend you uh-huh alex jones alex jones alex jones fired him he was left defenseless he didn't have the money to defend himself and so he said um he was really really really depressed couldn't come to the wedding and uh he said i'm gonna take a guilty plea it's the only thing i can do they run up so many charges against me and i don't have any money to defend myself the only reporter there that day from InfoWars. And he's the one who goes to jail.

Don't tell me that Alex is on your side. I am so sick of that stuff. Well, I got a lot of, I purged a lot of people who don't know who I am on Twitter. They don't follow me. They follow Alex. A lot of trolls as well yesterday. Because Alex had a clip of, uh, trolls as well yesterday, because Alex had a clip, uh, 20 years ago and said, you know, this is what they're going to do.

They're going to, you know, family camps and all the rest of this stuff. And, you know, and I said, yeah, as I said, many times he knew, he knew 20 years ago, he knew while he was doing it. I was there. These people want to lecture me. Yeah. So yeah, you don't know what's going on. I know better because I follow Alex and I'm a big fan of his and all this other kind of stuff.

It's like, uh, well, I was there. I saw it. So if you don't believe me, don't listen to me. You can turn it off right now. I'm telling you what I saw. Maybe there's a reason that everybody who ever worked for Alex, well, we won't go there. Anyway, no, if I really wanted to get Alex, believe me, I could.

That's a tar baby situation. It does enough when I try to warn people to stay away from the guy and don't follow him. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. That's a bit of a tar baby. But identifying himself as Sam with InfoWars.com.

Montoya shot and narrated a 44-minute video that showed him going from Capitol Grounds into the building, said the FBI. Well, there's a jail sentence right there, right? Did he fight his way in with that camera wrap? Of course he didn't. Come on. He was let in there just like Simone Gohl was let in, Dr. Simone Gohl. Montoya, 37, described himself as a reporter or a journalist. And of course, when this is reported by the local station, they put reporter and journalist in quotes.

Hey, let me tell you, local10.com, Sam is far more of a reporter and a journalist than you will ever be. He doesn't run and hide when things get tough. He doesn't run and hide because he might get in trouble. He goes to the problem and films it. Let's see you do that at local 10.com. Uh, so, uh, he was, the problem is he was wearing a red make America great again hat. And he made statements.

We take our house back. We take the people's house back, he said. So what? So what? Have you turned on your television set to see what people on the left say? Supposedly journalists and commentators and pundits and all the rest of this stuff? You're going to hang him for this? Come on.

Again, like I talked about John Sullivan. They said, well, he said things too. We're going to get him. Until they found out that he didn't really believe that stuff, then they let him go. Because this is about political persecution. And I've said so long for so long, we got to get over this idea that journalism is objective. Anybody that tells you that journalism is objective is somebody who's either a

fool or a liar. They either don't understand their biases or they're trying to deceive you. Just take a look at Matt Drudge, for example. Matt Drudge doesn't write anything. Matt Drudge is an editor, essentially. He looks at the news and he selects stories. Now, for the longest time, everybody knew that Matt Drudge had a very strong right-wing conservative bias to his news, didn't he? Didn't write anything. It's just what he chose to report on. Now he has a very, very strong left-wing bias,

establishment bias in his news. Doesn't write anything. It's what he chooses to report. What you even choose to talk about shows what your political bias is. And that's why they're censoring people. No, as I said, for the longest time, I was not interested in reading when I was in college.

I didn't read Newsweek, Time Magazine. They were garbage. They were mockingbird CIA garbage. Same thing of ABC, CBS, and NBC. No, I was interested in reading what people on the extremes would write. And it didn't have to be the extremes, but it's usually just the extremes who would tell you what they believed. And so I would read, you know, I like to say, from the nation to national review. I would get people who would say,

well, here's what's going on, and here's how I understand this, and try to make their argument for it. And then I would read it and make up my mind. That's what you ought to do your news as well. They don't want you to do that. So you need to look at the people who will say, here's what's been reported, and try to be as honest with the facts as possible,

knowing that what they even take an interest in is going to be something of their bias. But then to take a look at what they say about it. And so only a fool or a liar would tell you that journalism is objective. Wearing a MAGA hat and saying we're taking the people's house away. Is that any different than what Stephen Colbert's crew did? Absolutely not. This is just an example of the hopeless corruption in our judicial system and the political persecution

of political speech. Nobody there who didn't engage in any violence should be punished at all. And the people who did engage in violence, they should not be looking at jail sentences of decades or life in prison or anything. Violence is violence. It needs to be punished. But if people show up to air their grievances, even if I don't agree with their support of Trump.

It is criminal what is being done to the January 6th people. And it's criminal how President Trump has turned his back on them. How Alex Jones has turned his back on his own employees. You want to follow those grifting liars? Go ahead. I am sick and tired of a lot of them. Alex, Roger, the whole bunch of them. As far as I'm concerned, they're a bunch of crooks.

They're the ones who ought to go to jail. Not the people who actually do news reporting like Sam Montoya. So Stuart Rhodes, Friday, was brought in to testify earlier in the week. And, of course, Stuart Rhodes, if you don't know by now, head of Oath Keepers, they're trying to put through an historic sedition charge against him. It's such a reach that you have Darren Beattie, who's always looking for, you know, co-intel uh, you know, Darren Beatty, who's always looking for, you know, uh, uh, co-intel

pro, uh, you know, double agents and all this other kind of stuff that see, see, he's really a part of this. He set the whole thing up because they came up with a charge that is so far out. It's the same as just letting him go. I don't necessarily think that, um, I don't think there's a basis for it, but I don't think they're going to let him go necessarily. I'm not convinced of that at all. So the Washington Post began by talking about the lead-up to his testimony. They said that if he did not,

protesters said that he wanted Trump to declare the Insurrection Act, and that if he did not, protesters should have brought rifles to Washington, quote, we could have fixed it right then and there, Rhodes said during a January the 10th recording, and he boasted that he would have killed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Stringing her up right there. Well, you know, you just, with all your bravado and your bluster, Stuart, you just gave them the rope to hang you with. And that's what it was. It was bravado.

It was bluster. When he took the stand on Friday, he said, yeah, I had a lot to drink, and I was really PO'd. And so, yeah, I didn't really mean any of that. So the problem is, is that we have to, I just, it's amazing to me to see how these people are constantly saying this. And it's like, it's not Stuart only, you know, it's Alex, it's Roger, all of them. You know, Roger's got people following him around doing a documentary and he's making death threats against people on film.

In this kind of politically charged atmosphere, you don't understand how that's going to be used? They can't help themselves. They love the publicity. They have told me over and over again, there's no such thing as bad publicity. They are addicted to publicity. They are drawn to it like a moth to the flame. And they're going to go down in flames. I mean, it's just, it's amazing to see it.

So what happened with this? Lewis Tartt, thank you. He said, how much do we need to hire Sam? Well, that's true. You know, I don't know how he's very connected in Texas. He's a video editor. That's a that's an idea. But he's I don't know what's going to happen with him. I mean, the sentencing is coming up. I don't know. But yeah, if there's anybody to hire, we would need to hire Sam.

I don't know. Thank you, Kay Grace. I appreciate the tip in the comment. But what's going on with Stuart Rhodes? Here's how he got into trouble, the big trouble that he got into. I think the thing that is the linchpin on this is that he met with a guy who was this individual's name is Alpers. So the apparent relationship with Alpers is why Rhodes,

or the apparent relationship that Alpers had with Trump, is why Rhodes wanted to meet him. He said that he recorded, Alpers recorded the meeting to accurately provide information to President Trump. But what he got instead, he said, disturbed him enough to eventually go to the FBI. Key word there is eventually. He to eventually go to the FBI. Key word there is eventually. He didn't go to the FBI.

He recorded this, I think it was January the 10th, 2021. Okay. And he didn't go for several months to the FBI. He never took the recording to Trump. Why? Did he not believe it? This is what he had to say. He said, Alper said he didn't deliver Rhodes' words to Trump because I didn't agree with his message.

He also said he worried that being associated with these extremist ideologies would hurt his relationships and credibility with Trump. So, you know, I think he just didn't believe it. And so he didn't take it to him. But Alpers took the stand in the trial of Rhodes and four others accused of taking part in a seditious conspiracy against the U.S. government. seeking to prove the Oath Keepers' action on January the 6th were just one part of an attempt to prevent, by any means necessary, the lawful transition of presidential power. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham

just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Oath Keepers' co-operator said that he saw January the 6th as a Bastille-type moment.

Alper's testimony was followed by an FBI agent who displayed firearms, knives, and tactical gear that Rhodes purchased after January the 6th, and so on. But again, that's Washington Post reporting. Alpers told the Washington Post last year that as far as he knew, the company that he was CEO of began its election fraud project after he left the company. It looks like he's trying to distance himself from all this stuff. Alpers said he initially did nothing with the recording because he didn't want to get involved. But that sometime in the spring of 2021 he met with federal enforcement so again if he thought it was real why didn't report

it right away for several months i don't think he thought it was real which is why he didn't take it to trump and i don't think it was i think he didn't think it was real which is why he didn't take it to them i think he took it to them because he's trying to distance himself from all this stuff washington post says yeah this company that he's with you know they were pushing a lot of election fraud ideas and things like so stewart was uh grilled on the stand on friday when the district attorney or the prosecutor, federal prosecutor, asserted that he founded Oath Keepers to overthrow the government. He said, no, it was in opposition to George W. Bush era policies regarding military commissions and enemy combatants.

The assistant U.S. attorney that's coming after him, said that, well, Oathkeeper's founding came years later, shortly after Obama's election. Shattered that he launched it at Lexington, Massachusetts on April 19th, 2009. Anniversary of the shot heard around the world. Well, there you go. That shows that he is in opposition to this government because we identify as the British.

They identify as the king, as a tyrant. So, you know, if you talk about the founding of this country, if you talk about the people who had guns, military rifles and cannons, and they defended themselves when the British came after them, oh, you're on the wrong side. As a matter of fact, there's a long history of this. As I've talked about it many times, going back to Woodrow Wilson as he was trying to lie us into World War I for which we had no reason to be involved but he wanted us involved in World War I he hired Edward Bernays to be the propagandist Edward Bernays taught Goebbels everything he knew and Edward Bernays went on to work for Madison Avenue to teach them how to manipulate the public. Masterful propagandist.

But as he was trying to lie and manipulate us into World War I, for which we had no reason to be involved, there was a movie that came out called The Spirit of 76. And the guy who did it had worked on Birth of a Nation, which was a D.W. Griffiths groundbreaking movie. And it was set in the Civil War. It focused on Reconstruction and the birth of the Ku Klux Klan. So you don't see it too much anymore. But it was the first long format film. It was a real groundbreaking thing. Prior to that, you just had little shorts.

They were typically comedy types of things. You know, like you would see a Buster Keaton where he's, you know, doing all kinds of stunts, really doing the stunts on a train or something like that. But this is a full-featured thing, and this guy's work on the film was to recreate iconic scenes like the surrender at Appomattox or the assassination of Lincoln or things like that. And he did an amazing job, and so he thought,

well, I did such a good job on recreating those historical scenes. Let me do another one. And so he goes back to another fourth turning, the one before that, the Revolutionary War. And he did the Spirit of 76. Problem is, the British were the bad guys in the Spirit of 76. And Woodrow Wilson was trying to lie us into a war on their behalf as their allies. And so the federal government told him, cut this, cut that, cut this, cut that. And, um, he, um, took the film after they cut it up after he premiered it, I think in Chicago, they took it, uh, to LA, I think, and played the full version again, or I forget which

two cities where I think it was Chicago and LA. And after he violated their censorship for a second time and did not do their cuts, they came after him. They came after him with a big fine, $10,000 in those days, probably worth millions today, and put him in jail for 10 years. And he appealed to the Supreme Court and said, I have First Amendment rights. I have freedom of speech about this. And the Supreme Court said, and all this happened, you know, in the late 19-teens, just, you

know, as we're getting into World War I, the Supreme Court said, there is no First Amendment protection of movies. Do you understand that, Hollywood actors, all you people who don't like the First Amendment anymore now anyway, the movies did not get recognized as having First Amendment protection until the 1950s by the Supreme Court, but they had it all along. And so they put this guy in jail. They hit him with a massive fine because he talked about the British being the bad guy. And so here we are in this trial, evidence of the seditious attitudes of Stuart Rhodes as he talks about the founding of this country.

So then she showed the jury some footage of Rhodes unpacking that imagery and that history on the show of Alex Jones. And so there you go. I mean, he's obviously guilty of sedition if he talks about April the 19th, Concord and Lexington. Though he claimed he would oppose storming the Capitol because it exposed his members to legal jeopardy. Rhodes did not deny meeting with the person days later in an effort to deliver a message to then outgoing President Trump. Though he blamed some of the rhetoric on having had a couple of drinks. This is the quotes that I had talked about before, you know, when this guy Alpers recorded the whole conversation. And then to save himself, I think, ratted out Rhodes to, you know, instead of standing on his convictions and saying, you know, hey, we have, don't we have a freedom to address

our grievances with government? No, no, no. They're going to come after me. I'm going to rat out this other guy. Rhodes likewise did not dispute that he typed the message that Alpers said he wanted to deliver to Trump, urging the then president to militarize his paramilitary groups to help him seize power by force. You must use the Insurrection Act and use the power of the presidency to stop him, Rhodes told Trump in the message, and all us veterans will support you and so will the vast majority of military. The prosecutor ended a cross-examination with an audio recording, appearing to lament that the quick reaction force didn't deploy. Rhodes said in the recording from January the 10th,

my only regret is that they should have brought rifles. He replied, he says, yes, I did say that. Yes, after a couple of drinks and i was p.o'd and again as i said you know the stuff he is giving them more than enough rope to hang him because he was all about the bragging and this is what these guys do uh and i'm not doing this to support uh stewart roads i don't agree with what I've heard people. I haven't checked into this. I don't know, but there's a lot of oath keepers have come to me with allegations of mishandling of money. So I'm not doing any interviews with Stuart Rhodes.

I've done interviews in the past with him. I don't have a problem with uh with his speech uh i do have a problem if he is genuinely trying to start a revolution but i don't think uh i honestly don't believe that it was i think it was um uh his uh bravado and booze that was talking but um he gave them all they need to hang him. If you look at the transcript, it looks pretty damning. So as I said, in this kind of environment, I wouldn't be surprised if they convict him of this. We have a Montana attorney general has demanded that YouTube restore gun videos that it removed. This is, you know, like we talk about Concord and Lexington.

First, they came after the YouTube videos of the Patriots and Concord and Lexington. Then they came after the cannons. And Santa Ana came after the cannon as well. You know, they come and take a flag. That was a cannon on there. Don't talk to me about, well, you can't have this because it's a military weapon. That's the whole point, pal.

Read the Second Amendment. That's what the citizen militia is about. Anyway, Montana Attorney General Austin Knudson is asking. He's not. He's asking. Please restore this. Asking YouTube to stop discriminating against conservative views and restore lawful videos that it removed. He said so long as YouTube acts hand in glove

with the federal politicians to repress constitutional rights, states will continue finding ways to rein in the power of big tech. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly.

18plusgamblingcare.ie Well, again, is this virtue signaling if not sue them you're the state attorney general you got the authority to do something about it take it to court talk about how these people are deputized agents of the state for censorship right as attorney general make that case even if you don't win in court people need to understand that's what's really happening whether or not the court realizes it publicize that you're a politician it'll get you re-elected go for it tell them youtube is a deputy of the deep state for censorship and of davos and of the un and whatever you know the pharmaceutical industry all the rest of them they've been deputized and for censorship, and of Davos, and of the UN, and whatever,

the pharmaceutical industry, all the rest of them. They've been deputized and bribed and paid off by a lot of different people. The guy who got censored had written earlier this year to his U.S. senators from Montana. In the document, he requested swift action to restore the video upload. He also condemned a February letter written by several Northeastern Democrat senators that urged YouTube to take action on so-called ghost gun content, of which the licensed dealer's content qualified. He was showing them basically how to legally do a ghost gun.

He was showing people how to comply with the law. And they removed it. Because they how to comply with the law. And they removed it. Because they don't comply with the law. And they don't recognize your God-given rights to have the means of defense. He said, my whole thing is, I'm not mad that YouTube took it down. I mean, I don't like YouTube's community guidelines,

but I did violate it, he said. What I'm upset about is that five U.S. senators used Senate letterhead to take down videos that they didn't agree with. He said, understand, that's why I call it. They're the deputized censors of the government that is prohibited from censoring speech. So they deputize YouTube. They send letters to YouTube.

They have hearings and tell YouTube to do it. The conservatives and the Republicans do it. You'll censor who I tell you to, right? Kroger is going to have to pay two employees $180,000 after they violated their First Amendment rights, religious discrimination. A court has awarded $180,000 to ex-employees fired for refusing to wear aprons they thought promoted the LGBT agenda. This is after a two-year religious discrimination case.

The court ruled that an attempt to force them to wear uniforms that they believed promoted LGBT lifestyles violated the women's civil rights, violated their First Amendment. The parties decided to resolve the case with a consent decree to avoid additional costs and uncertainties of future litigation, they said. The statement explains that Lawson and Rickard, the two plaintiffs, were, quote, disciplined and ultimately fired and quote after refusing to wear an apron at the company's our promise symbol

because they believed that it represented support for the LGBTQ plus community. It's a rainbow heart. Uh, it wasn't just their belief. Kroger believed it did too, which is why they fired them. Oh, you don't support, uh, you don't support the LGBT? You're fired. The women believed the emblem endorsed those values and that wearing it would violate their religious beliefs. They had worked at the company for 8 and 13 years respectively

and were fired within days of each other in 2019. Although the organization denied that the rainbow heart on the employee aprons was a pride rainbow. What did they call that? It was, um, yeah, they called it our promise. They didn't call it our pride.

Uh, Kroger has announced that the company was named one of the, quote, the best places to work for LGBTQ equality, unquote, for three consecutive years beginning in 2019. A press release from March 2019 states that Kroger earned a perfect score on the 2019 Corporate Equality Index, the Human Rights Campaign Foundation's national benchmarking tool for corporate policies. The Human Rights Campaign is not about human rights.

It's about pushing the LGBT agenda. Yeah, they carefully chose a name. That's not what they're about. A national benchmarking tool for corporate policies and practices supporting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer employees. So that was exactly what it was about. The EEOC understands it. Kroger knows it. The people who were fired know it. And the good news is that they had to pay $180,000 to these two ladies. Male and female, that's it.

It says Canada is a political party leader of the PPC. $180,000 to these two ladies. Male and female, that's it, says Canada's political party leader of the PPC, Maxime Bernier. He began a newsletter November 2nd from the PPC, the People's Party of Canada. He said, male and female, that's it. Anyone can feel the way they want, of course, and nobody has to conform to male and female stereotypes, but there are only two sexes and also two genders, not 52, as radical gender

activists are now claiming. He says, I'm not sure when this basic reality became so controversial. Bernays marveled that, quote, stating this simple biological fact could get you canceled by crazy leftists and their allies in the mainstream media. It could also get you fired by Kroger. I think Kroger is, well, they're one of the biggest grocery store chains in the U.S.,

maybe the biggest in the U.S. Charles Smith, thank you very much for the tip. Alan Vail, thank you as well. Thank you very much for the tip. Uh, Alan Vale. Thank you as well. He says, good morning, David.

Today. I feel like the elections have already been stolen or at least very least rigged. So the fallout will be less for the Democrats. The media is openly telling us results will take days, if not weeks. Thank you for your honesty. Yes.

We're going to talk about that. Uh, I've, um, I've got the issues, uh, the people and, the key issue of whether or not you can trust this election.

One of the reasons why I talked to Jeff Maurer last week, the libertarian candidate for secretary of state, he said, really, you know, for the good of our society, we have to have transparency so that people can trust the elections. And I'm telling you right now, neither side wants that. You know, it would be good for them if they had somebody who was the ultimate authority, Secretary of State in a state who has ultimate authority over the elections and how they're run. If you had an independent third party, and that has many different meanings in this particular case, yes, he's a third political party, but he's a third party that's not allied with the Democrats and Republicans, who we know we can't trust to do this honestly, with transparency. Because we know from the very beginning that the two of them have rigged the election, even the ballot access to make sure that nobody but them gets on.

And that's how they control us with that left-right paradigm. And you choose one or the other. That's how they manipulate people, that kind of dialogue. So anyway, Maxime Bernier goes on to say, anybody can feel however they want. Nobody has to conform to any male or female stereotypes, but nobody should be forced either to use absurd pronouns or to be in a bathroom or locker room with a member of the opposite sex. He called gender transition surgeries body mutilation.

And he said he cannot believe that it's become a normalized solution for a mental issue. And that's what the medical professionals have always said. That is not feeling comfortable in your own body and doing it to kids as well. He says, whatever happened to the left, they went from vilifying gender norms to promoting childhood transition based on these exact same gender norms. He promised that if his party were to form a government, that the PPC will end this bizarre trend and outlaw the transition of minors. And it's, you know, this is one of the things when you look at these Republicans, it's not

enough to outlaw the transition of the minors. You got to stop with your government schools pushing them to do this. You've got to stop with the propaganda campaign that's happening. And even in Florida, you know, where DeSantis, Virtue Signals, look, I'm going to stop all this. You can't talk to the kids unless they're past third grade. What? Fourth graders are still minors.

Twelfth graders are still minors. Twelfth graders are still minors. Why is the state of Florida going to push this garbage? Why are you going to let them gaslight minors for this at any age? It's just too bad that we don't have any gutsy politicians like this guy on this issue. Maybe I could vote for him. Does Canada allow you, a foreign citizen, to vote like New York City does? If it does, I need to be voting for Maxime Bernier

to bring some sanity back on this issue. So, yeah, we're going to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're gonna take a quick break and, uh, when we come back, uh, we're going to pick up with the election news. Cause I want to get into that before, uh,

Eric Peters joined at live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football, the excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly.

18plusgamblingcare.ie ...is us in the third hour. Stay with us. We'll be right back. The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us.

Their commons project, to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.

They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

The David Knight Show dot com. TheDavidKnightShow.com You know, there's a reason why the left has doubled and tripled down on this insanity of the LGBT agenda, especially the transgender agenda. But it applies to all the LGBT stuff. As I've said for the longest time, if you can pretend that a minor can make decisions about mutilating their body. And again, I covered it several years ago. There was a guy who, that was his specialty, people who had what they call gender dysphoria. And he said, he was in Canada, and he said, look, I support the government paying for these operations,

but only if the person is older than 21, and only if that person has also lived that way for at least two years. He said this is something that comes and goes with people. It's a mental disorder. And before you do anything radical like that, and for that he was purged, even though that was his specialty. But there's a lot of different agendas to this. There is the claim that minors can make this kind of decision.

Well, then it's very easy to claim that they can consent to sex, so there's a pedophile agenda to it. There's also a transhumanism agenda. Oh, yeah, we can modify our bodies. We can turn ourselves into lizards or demons or this or that. We can tattoo the whites of our eyes, and we can put in horns underneath our surgically implanted horns, underneath the skin of our forehead

and all the different things that you've seen these people do. Split their tongue like a snake and all this other kind of thing. Forked tongue. That doesn't make them a lizard or a demon or a snake or an alien or whatever they do. I mean, they're mutilating their body in the worst kind of ways. And it is a real psychological issue, but it doesn't turn them into any of those things. But this is all feeding in to the transhumanism thing.

So at the beginning of it, it's a pedophile agenda. But then it transitions into, if you will, a transhumanist agenda for all the things that they want to do with us technologically. And then it also has a depopulation agenda. And you can see it here in China. Why China's marriage crisis is an existential threat to the country. They've gone from one child policy to a zero child policy. And they do it because they have used schools and entertainment and media to tell women they don't want to be married. They don't want to have kids. They don't want to have a family, right? They say in China, hyper-traditional as it is, that society, having a child out of wedlock is still frowned upon.

Childbearing and childrearing are synonymous with marriage. Imagine that. Imagine if we had a society that understood the purpose of marriage. Last year, the communist nation saw marriage rates hit a 35-year low. The sharp drop in marital vows comes at the same time that China faces an impending demographic crisis. 2021 saw 7.6 million marriage registrations, the fewest since 1986. With falling birth rates and a rapidly aging population, China faces problems that are

very much existential in nature. In truth, China's marriage crisis has been an issue for the best part of a decade. In the space of six years, between 2013 and 19, the number of Chinese citizens getting married... At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee fell from 23.8 million to 13.9 million a 41 percent drop of course the chinese communist party's ill-advised one child policy which was in place for 35 years, has resulted in far fewer people of marriageable age. Well, no, it hasn't.

It's resulted in far fewer women of marriageable age. They have a tremendous imbalance between male and female. And it's not just on the female side. The families that have a single son, they have spoiled them rotten because they see that son as their future. That son is going to be the one who's going to take care of them. They still don't trust the government to take care of them wisely. And so with only one child, they think that male child is going to take care of them.

That's one of the reasons why they would abort or give away any females that were born. Gender side is what a lot of people have called that, but it also has another side to it. And that is, um, you know, this imbalance of, uh, excess males is one of the best predictors of war. And they will take that frustration and they'll turn it into a foreign war. That's been in the books for quite some time. But you also have these self-absorbed, narcissistic, spoiled brats,

these little emperors. We saw that firsthand when we were there. It's not just a stereotype that does not exist without a lot of reasons for it. And so you have problems on both sides. There's not enough women. The women that are there, many of them are told they don't want to have marriage. It'd be better for them to work in iPhone city under slave conditions, pumping out iPhones for Apple, right? You don't want a family. We don't want kids. China has also witnessed changing attitudes to marriage,

especially among young women who are becoming more educated, financially independent. They're also pushing back against patriarchal traditions. And this writer of this story says, yes, I know. Zero hedge. Actually, it's coming from Epic Times. I know you've heard patriarchal traditions so much that you don't, you just blow this away and I don't blame you. He said, however, in China, it's a little bit different than in the U.S. or the U.K.

The Chinese, we're told, have a rather controversial saying that if you don't beat your wife every three days, she'll start tearing up the roof tiles. Well, that's another issue altogether. And that really is an issue of two things. Number one, they don't have a society that's founded on Christian principles. They have a massive Christian church, and that whole thing may flip. That's our best hope against World War III. You know that? The underground church in China is our best hope against World War III.

Just leave that there. Let you think about it. Anyway, it's not founded on Christian principles. And when you have an authoritarian society, as I've talked about in the past, in East Germany, there was one lady who was an American who was a radical university student. She loved communism, so she wanted to live there. She was very disturbed to find out that even though she moved there, dearly loved communism and communists and all of this, just embraced all married a guy who was there she was suspect always a suspect of the stasi the east german secret police they thought she was a double

agent or something some american coming here because you like communism that can't be real nobody could be that stupid oh yes people educated in the elite colleges of America are really that stupid. They couldn't believe it, that anybody would choose to live there under those conditions and love it. So they had her under complete surveillance. And she realized that years later when they released the secret files of the Stasi, she also realized that all of her friends and neighbors were spying on her and reporting to the Stasi about her. And that kind of bothered her. She said, I really feel betrayed. Yeah, lady, you got clueless to the nth degree. But she said, you know, the people there were the nicest people until you got into a situation where they had some authority. For example,

she said, you know, a nice neighbor that she knew all the time and, you know, not in the job. But when you went to the butcher shop where this person worked and you waited in line for a very, very long time to get whatever it was that was in stock at the time, once you got up there, she said, the same person turned into an officious monster, the authoritarianism popped out. And that's very understandable. You know, people who live under this kind of authoritarian pressure, when they get a little bit of power, oh, well, you know, then they start kicking the cat or whatever.

I think that that's the other factor of what's happening in the families. If, in fact, it is a common thing, as this article says, for men to beat their wives. I think that is another example of what happens in an authoritarian society. It certainly is an example of what happens in a society that is not based on biblical principles. I'm not going to go into it, but there's an article about trad wives. Karen's a trad wife. She's a great trad. She's so trad, she's like Proverbs 31. And that doesn't mean that there's no respect. We have different complementary roles. And she does hers better than I do mine.

So you can have fulfillment in these different roles. God made us for different roles. And what is being sold to women, what is being sold to men, is not in our best interest. What's being sold to us by the mainstream media, by the governments, by the entertainment industry is not in our best interest. It's as far away from our natural instincts and our best interests as this transgender stuff is away from the interest of children. So, yeah, we can do that. That's fine.

Eric's going to come on at 10, so he's going to come in in about eight minutes. Let me finish up with some of this news here. The COVID shots are linked to plummeting fertility, says a study. That's another way they're coming after us. They're coming after us socially, so they don't want children. We don't even want a marriage. They come after us socially so they don't want children. We don't even want a marriage. They come after us psychologically that way and the shaming. Oh, well, you're nothing but a housewife type of thing.

Yeah, be proud of that. The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. And this is why the government wants to take mother's hand off of the cradle and grab that cradle themselves. And, uh, the cradle of civilization, it's off of its rocker.

Uh, no, the COVID shots linked to plummeting fertility. No, sorry. W and D the real headline is the Trump shots are linked to plummeting. Why don't they want to give Trump credit for it? I, No, sorry, WND. The real headline is the Trump shots are linked to plummeting. Why don't they want to give Trump credit for it?

People get so mad at me when I call it the Trump shot. I get trolls coming back. Okay, we're going to go back to 11 o'clock for Eric. Okay, that's fine. I get trolled by people so much about that. It's like, look, he loves it. He calls himself the father of the jab. But, you know, he's been quiet about it lately. They finally, his handlers, finally got the message through to him to shut up and put his ego on the back burner there.

Anyway, Germany's Federal Institute for Population Research has reported a strong association between the onset of vaccination programs and fertility decline. Nine months after. Fertility drop happened only after the Trump shots were introduced. Consumers now know that the Trump shots themselves are suspected of causing a multitude of additional problems, including a wide range of heart ailments, especially amongst young men. And that's, I mean, turbo cancer, blood clots, blood disorder, blood disease. The documents show 14% decline in total fertility rate in Germany. Sweden's decline was down 10%.

So when you combine the actual physical things that are being done to us by the pharmaceutical companies, by the corporations and the adulterated food and that type of thing, you combine that with the psychological stuff. That's why this is all about depopulation. Fertility decline in the first months of 2022 in Germany and Sweden is remarkable, says a report. Common explanation of fertility change during the pandemic does not apply in its aftermath. The association between the onset of mass vaccinations and subsequent fertility decline indicates that people adjusted their behavior to get vaccinated before becoming

pregnant as societies were opening up in the post-pandemic life conditions. That only scratches the surface, that report. As a matter of fact, I saw this clip from Anomaly on Twitter. I retweeted it, but I want you to hear this. You know, we have all these people, amnesty is the latest thing, right? And they want you to forget. They want you to forget what happened. They want your amnesia as well as amnesty for themselves. They're giving themselves the amnesty.

They're not asking for it from you, really. They're declaring that they have it. And we have people even like Ben Shapiro, who shilled for it for, we're up to 971 days now, and it's just a few days ago that he changed. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival,

we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets.

Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. And so Anomaly put this out and he said, even though Ben Shapiro is now on the right side of the vaccines, here's what Ben Shapiro was saying when it really mattered. And it's Ben Shapiro versus Louis Farrakhan of all people. And we have seen a tremendous amount of vaccine hesitancy,

unfortunately, in the Black and Hispanic community. If they come up with a vaccine, be careful. Don't let them vaccinate you with their history of treachery through vaccines. Hey, black America, only 67 percent of black Americans say they definitely will get the vaccine or probably get the vaccine. So the black community has tremendous vaccine hesitancy. Hey, that is a real problem. They are making money now plotting to give seven billion, 500 million people a vaccination. Dr. Fauci,

Bill Gates and Melinda. You want to depopulate there? What the hell gives you that right? The people who should be ripped up and down right now are people like Louis Farrakhan, who's literally going out there and telling his millions of followers that the COVID vaccine is a vial of death. Have you seen any media

coverage of this? If a major conservative figure who had met with a bunch of members of Congress literally telling people that the COVID vaccine was a vial of death. You know, that would be the front. I said it was a bioweapon. That's why they shut me down, Ben. Conservatives deny vaccine efficacy. And yet here was Louis Farrakhan doing just that. Democratic members of Congress have met with this guy. They continue to meet with this guy. Have you seen a headline about this? Here's Louis Farrakhan, who has many, many followers, talking about how the COVID vaccine is a vial of death. Some of these so-called vaccines,

you know, it's the nanoparticles that men like Dr. Fauci have proprietary knowledge of that allows them to get a patent for their vial of death. I mean, how is that not the headline? Right. I mean, seriously, that should be the headline. You want to talk about overcoming COVID? We should be talking about vaccine hesitancy. Yeah. OK, well, as I've said before. headline. You want to talk about overcoming COVID? We should be talking about vaccine hesitancy. Yeah, okay. Well, as I've said before, you know, Ben Shapiro likes to identify himself as a conservative. And I think the perfect way to understand conservatism is to say that opinions are formed by time, validated by time, and not by truth. Problem is that for Louis Farrakhan, this is not his first rodeo with weaponized medicine.

Ben Shapiro, whether or not his opinions were informed by time, by truth, or by lucre, by money that he was paid, right? Or by access so that he could make money, right? He was never kicked off anywhere. He could say all kinds of radical stuff about a lot of different subjects, but don't oppose the vaccine or we'll kick you off. That was understood. Ben Shapiro is a smart guy.

He knows that. And so he played along with that. And that back and forth there that you see, a good example of Farrakhan, skeptical, as we all should be, especially now. But again, it wasn't his first rodeo. And that's not to endorse everything that Louis Farrakhan says. There's a lot of stuff that I think he says that's completely off the wall. But it underscores to me, as I've said in the past,

I like to get my news from all different sides. I listen to Farrakhan. I listen to Ben Shapiro. That's even crazier than National Review of the Nation. But no, you don't discount something because of its source any more than you accept it because of its source. The information needs to stand on its own. That's how you need to be a wise consumer of information.

You don't look at this and say, well, if Louis Farrakhan is saying this stuff is dangerous and it's untested and on and on. Well, then, you know, obviously it's safe because he's telling everybody that it's dangerous. So I'm not going to believe him. Or conversely, you know, Shapiro telling everybody that it's safe. China is taking aggressive steps to gut Canada's democracy, warns Justin Trudeau. Can you believe it? This is a guy, I won't play the clip for you, but I've played the clip several times where he was asked, other than Canada, what is your favorite country in the world?

And he said China. And the reason that he gave was that China is an authoritarian, totalitarian society that can just tell people to follow the environmentalism, you know, the green reset. That's what we should call it, the green reset. Yeah, they can just tell people they got to do it and they do it. I wish I that kind of power and we've heard george w bush say that same type of thing i wish i was a chinese dictator i could just tell people what to do they all have these fantasies of being absolute dictators they don't have any thing at all in with George Washington or Cincinnatus of Rome. No, he admired the totalitarianism,

the ability to dictate terms to people from China. But now he says China is taking aggressive steps to gut Canada's democracy. His comments on money came after a news report that Beijing had funded a clandestine network of candidates in Canada's 2019 election. And just days after the federal police force said it was actively investigating a secret network of illegal Chinese police stations in Toronto. Well, you know, I mean, it is kind of interesting, isn't it, that Justin Trudeau was part of the secret network of people that Klaus Schwab bragged that he put in place from Davos? It's not so much a secret anymore.

It's kind of an open secret. They're open about it. But, you know, now he has to take a position against China because as some people are saying, it's far worse than you might imagine. The efforts are believed to include placing agents in the offices of lawmakers to influence policy in China's favor, as well as attempts to co-opt

and corrupt former Canadian officials. Does that sound like what Klaus Schwab, the UN and Davos and World Economic Forum is doing? Well, exactly what they're doing. Exactly what they're doing. And David Mulroney, Canada's former ambassador to China, said the allegations were, quote, far more aggressive, unquote, than previously suspected. He said, just when you think some of these allegations against China are exaggerated, you find that they've been, in fact, understated. This is what we're finding about everything,

frankly. You thought we were exaggerating about the bioweapon, the Trump shot? It was understated. We knew people were dying at unprecedented levels in an unprecedented frame of time. Typically, it'd take a long time. People typically never before dropped dead right after a vaccine. And simply because it didn't happen to everybody. Oh, well, you know, it's rare.

No, it's much worse than we told you at the beginning. And it just keeps getting worse. It's interesting, isn't it, that Elon Musk, when we talk about trying to overthrow and influence the Canadian government, it was his grandfather, Joshua Haldane, who was brought up on charges of trying to overthrow the Canadian government and install a technocracy. Big follower of H.G. Wells and all these people, you know,

Things to Come, Shape of Things to to come the book and the movie. Um, and yeah, yeah. Well, the elite technocrats should rule the world. Joshua Haldane believed it so much. He tried to institute it. They kicked him. He beat the rap and then he beat it out of Canada, went to South Africa. And that's why, um, Elon Musk is an African-American. Bayer has been ordered to pay $275 million for brain damage caused by Monsanto's PCBs. You know, the interesting thing about this, Monsanto has been bought by Bayer now. Bayer knew about all these issues when they paid billions of dollars for them. But when you go back and you look at the products of Monsanto, many people called it Monsantin,

and it really was a satanic product line. It not only had PCBs, before Monsanto voluntarily dropped them in 1977, they estimated they created 1.5 billion pounds of PCBs. Exposure has been linked to diabetes, liver toxicity, cancer, deficits in neurological and immune system functions. And then as a follow-up, they came up with glyphosate that they sell under the trade name of Roundup. Glyphosate implants can alter the human gut microbiome and increases in use are well correlated with an increase in breast cancer,

pancreatic cancer, kidney cancer, thyroid cancer, liver cancer, bladder cancer, and leukemia. Well, you know, there we are. These are these corporations. And it's the same ethics that you see from the pharmaceutical corporations who push out the opioids, who pushed them through doctors to unsuspecting people in hospitals to get them addicted when they would come in with an injury. Now, these are not people who are looking to get high.

These are people who were in pain, who trusted their doctor their doctor had been bribed cajoled entertained in many cases by these pushers of opioids got them addicted on it destroyed their lives many of them committed suicide many of them died from opioids and the pharmakia did not repent of their murders the The greatest, the wealthiest men on earth did not repent of their murders. 2,000 years ago, that was written. That's the time we live in. People are afraid to walk down the streets

of some Irish towns. One in particular, Killarney, one-fifth of the Irish town is now immigrants in Killarney, boosted by open border policies of the Irish government. But of course, it doesn't have to be that way. In Italy, the new president there, I think that's her name, her title. No, she's prime minister.

Prime minister, I can never tell. Prime minister, Georgia Maloney said, well, Italy is a fully sovereign country and we don't need to allow migrants from a German ship owned by a German non-governmental organization, an NGO. We don't have to destroy our country like Ireland has. Three NGO ships with more than a thousand people on board are waiting to dock off the Italian coast. But Prime Minister Giorgia Maloney and Interior Minister Matteo Piantadosi are firmly refusing German demands that the ships dock in Italian ports. If Germany believes that there's a humanitarian problem, it should take care of it. Italy cannot be the refuge of all immigrants, they replied, and said we are a

sovereign country. Well, preppers are stocking up, and even things are getting so uncertain that even CBS is now doing stories about preppers. Isn't that interesting? And the thing that I find interesting about this, and I'm not going to go into the details of it. If you want to see what their interview with a prepper is about, what I thought was interesting was it said preppers in 2022 stocking up and skilling up for extreme catastrophes. And I think that's where we need to look at today. It's easy enough to stock up for stuff,

but skilling up is a key thing to make sure that you have some skills that you can barter with and to make sure that you have a society that you are a part of, a local society. You need to know people in your area that have a similar understanding have created skills and resources that you can not be a lone wolf in all of this stuff you want to skill up and you want to make connections with people former university professors who they talked to he wrote a book two years ago about prepping, and then he became a convert to it. He said, our country doesn't have the infrastructure anymore to be able to deal with emergencies in a meaningful way.

Well, that is exactly right. That is exactly right. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. You're going to have to deal with it yourself. There's no help coming from Washington Washington in case you haven't noticed. So we'll talk about the elections and, you know, the voting uncertainty and the lack of transparency when we come back and also take a look at what is the likely outcome is going to be. Not just who the winners and losers are going to be, but what difference will it make? We'll talk about that. And I think there is a difference that could be made in some areas. And any of these areas would be important to

slow this thing down and to buy us a little bit of time. We'll be right back. Thank you. The End you're listening to the david knight show all right and we have a tip and a comment from a woots thank you very much for the tip he says uh or she says um he or she says per the discussion yesterday despite four and a half billion years of Earth's existence, there's no evidence of any parallel architecture of life other than DNA, RNA coding. I think this flies in the face of evolutionary theory proposals of spontaneous life generation, and rather reinforces a divine hand. Thanks, David. Yeah, I agree with that. And I'll say this as well. You know, one of the things that when I talk about genetic modification as opposed to selective breeding, right? Selective breeding, it gives us a kind of wild variety that we see in dogs and other animals. But that has to be, that can only be done with animals of like kind. Whereas if you talk about genetic modification,

you can take a bit of an animal over here and another animal over here that have absolutely, that could never breed with each other, and you can produce some kind of a chimera. And even more so, you can, there is a, the DNA doesn't run just within the animals, right? It also runs within plants. It's a basic building material of all life, plant and animal. And when you look at the evolutionary paradigm that was always sold, what did they say? Well, they would dumb all the animals down to a skeleton and then do comparative analogy, talking about backbones, invertebrates,

vertebrates, and all the rest of this stuff. Well, you know, what you're seeing here is not a common designer. It's a common origin. Somehow life just spontaneously generated, and then they gradually changed. And yet, how do you explain the commonality to plants? If both plants and animals are controlled by a DNA code, how do you explain that other than a common designer? And again, when we taught our kids, I really enjoyed being able to go over the,

and I do want to go through, I had somebody ask me, you know, some of the things that we found useful and I need to talk about, I need to put it actually in a sub stack as well and say, these are some of the things that we really found to be useful. There are so many more resources today than there were when we were doing this, you know, 20, 30 years ago. But, you know, there were still some excellent resources. And so anyway, I'd be happy to recommend some of those books. And I apologize to the person who asked me about this,

who's homeschooling their kids. I haven't gotten back to them by email. So if you're listening, I still intend to do that i'll get back to you personally i'll put it up on substack and i'll talk to people about what i found to be interesting but i'll just put it in general terms and i'll say that i never enjoyed biology when i was in school because of that i didn't believe in evolution when i was in um i was never that gullible. I grew up in a Christian church and they were very combative about that, made sure we understood the issues from an early age. So I used to fight with my teachers over that stuff. So I never bought into

that and I found it to be extremely boring what they were pushing out there. When I started teaching the kids, we started looking at the unique characteristics of different animals. When we start looking at intelligent design, as I've said before, you look at a woodpecker, you look at a giraffe, what are the different subsystems that all interact together to make that a successful animal, a successful organism? You know, the woodpecker has got special shock-absorbing stuff for its brain when it hammers the side of the tree. It's got special feet to hold it there. It's got a long, sticky tongue that it can go through the hole that it's created to get insects

and all the rest of the stuff. You have to have all of these different things all at once for animal after animal for it to work. And it truly is a marvel of design. You know, the ability of, well, the mechanism of a giraffe's brain to keep it from passing out when it bends down. It's got to have this massive heart to pump blood up to the head. But then when the blood, when the head goes down low to drink water, it would pass out, except that there's the sponge-like thing there to absorb that increased

pressure. All of these different things didn't just happen. And they all had to be there at once. That's the whole idea behind intelligent design. And the question is, do we know the designer? Well, it's easy to know. So let's talk about the election. Election officials fear counting delays. And they say that's going to help to fuel claims of fraud. This is coming from the Washington Post. And again, I asked the question, how come most of my life we had

situations where we had hand ballots and we had mechanical machines and other than, you know, the people who are driving around with voting machines in the back of their cars in Chicago, we pretty much could handle it. And we could get our machines in the back of their cars in Chicago, we pretty much could handle it. And we could get our results in the same night. How come you can't now that we've got computers? Now that we've got computers, we can't get the information in the same night, right? Even though back when we had hand counting, paper ballots, and maybe a little bit of mechanical

voting machines, we were able to get the information right away, but now we can't? Seriously? You want us to believe that? Well, of course, there's another dimension to all of this, and that is the male aspect of the election. That was brought in by Trump. It's just amazing to me, you know, the people who are so upset about the vaccines, they don't realize that Trump is the father of the vaccine he's proud of.

Do you realize that Trump is the father of the mail-in election, or the mail-out election, I should say, where they mail out ballots to everybody? In many cases, more than one ballot gets mailed out. All of that came from Trump, too. He's the father of the election mail fraud. It was all made possible because of his lockdown and keeping the lockdown in place. And so both parties are now complaining about this, but both parties do nothing. Why?

Because the chaos is desired. In Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, writes the Washington Post, officials have in recent days preemptively called for patience, acknowledging that some of the factors that bogged down the process in 2020 remain unresolved. Two years later, well, of course, because they remained unresolved in, for example, Georgia.

Two months later, because Trump was too busy making money out of it. Here's another one. That was by Washington Post. Here's one from NPR. Be patient. This election is probably going to go on for a long while. Again, like Trump's executive order of a national emergency that is now 971 days old,

mail-in voting is now two years old. That is another precedent of Trump. And it looks like it's going to be just as permanent as the executive order for national state of emergency over a pandemic. And it looks like it has no justification for it either. But they do like to have this because it creates uncertainty. It creates chaos.

And that is what they want. This is from Yahoo News. Reuters, actually. Special report voting system firms are battling right-wing rage against the machines. Well, if the machines. Well, if the machines are not a problem, then why is it taking longer that we have the machines and why are we getting

no transparency? Why do we have no ability to audit the results? You might ask yourself why people don't trust your machines and your elections and what you could do to fix that. If it wasn't your plan to create chaos, your machines and your elections and what you could do to fix that if It wasn't your plan to create chaos We have seen over and over again for decades how easy it is to hack these you can hack them if you have Access to them on the internet anybody anywhere in the world can hack them if you have physical access to it You can hack them by instilling

Some kind of a virus on a thumb drive or something that will alter the votes and then erase itself. We've seen that demonstrated on local news over and over again. I've talked about that endlessly. And then there's a lot more wrinkles to this as well. Dominion voting systems and ES&S, election systems and software, are waging a political and public relations ground war to beat back threats to their money, to their money. See, their profits, according to Reuters and according to NPR

and according to the Washington Post, these corporations' profits are more important than honesty, integrity, and transparency in elections. Yeah, democracy dies in darkness, right? It also dies without any transparency, which would be a better way to put it, except I guess they wanted three Ds. Democracy dies in darkness.

But it dies without any transparency. Dominion has also turned to the courts because they're involved in lawfare, lawfare against anybody that is going to cost them money or anybody who's going to challenge their arrogance in terms of not providing transparency or audit capability to the public. So again, giant lawsuits against Trump, Fox News, and all the rest of this stuff.

And I hope that those lawsuits fail. It's another example of just outright corruption in our country. Whether countries face a tsunami of suspicion, I'm sorry, whenever companies face a tsunami of suspicion and distrust of their products that poses an existential threat to their livelihood and their survival who cares do you care i mean why is it that reuters and these other companies are saying well you know this is yeah this is an existential threat to dominion and to es and s good go out of business if you're not going to give us transparency trust something that we can see. Who needs you? We don't need you.

We had elections long before we had any of these companies, and we could have elections without them as well. But there's a lot of money that's on the line. $100 million on the line, some of the highest profile attacks on voting machines have originated with MyPillow chief executive and Trump ally Mike Lindell. In June, at a Louisiana Voting System commission meeting, he told state officials that America will be lost, quote,

if we keep one machine in this country going forward. I absolutely agree with Mike Lindell on that. I don't agree with him on his Trump support. I don't agree with him in the way that they have not produced the information in the way that they need to about this stuff, but he's absolutely right. I mean, there's many ways that you could tackle this, but I absolutely agree with his conclusion.

In Nevada, they're going to be doing hand counting. In Ohio, Stark County, Dominion's business is also precarious there. The local board of elections voted in December 2020 to replace aging Dominion machines with more than 1,400 new ones at a cost of $6.5 million. That's right. We don't need to make the roads any bigger. We don't need to fix the potholes. We don't even need to put up charging stations for the EVs that are going to be the only thing you're going to be allowed to have if Biden and the Democrats have their say. We don't need to do any of that stuff.

Let's get some machines that we can't trust. Some machines that don't have audit capability or transparency. Let's get those machines. Six and a half million dollars for Stark County, Ohio. That's a lot of money. And it has to be paid for by taxes, property taxes in that area. After Trump supporters protested, citing false voter fraud claims, that's Reuters. Yeah, show that they're false. Look, Reuters, the burden of proof should not be on the people.

The burden of proof that these things are not fraudulent should be on the election officials and it should be on the companies. They should show us their hands. Show us the numbers. Be transparent. Let us see what's going on with audits. If you don't do that, you're the ones who need to make the case that this is honest. Not us. The burden of proof is on you. So the county's all-Republican Board of Commissioners voted in March of 2021 to withhold funding for the machines,

arguing that the county could save money by using other voting equipment vendors. The county's Board of Elections sued the commissioners in April of last year to try to force them to buy the machines in time for the primary election. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in May 2021 that the elections board has the authority to select voting technology, and the county must go ahead with the purchase of Dominion machines.

And so the county complied with the ruling. Do you see the problem with all this? The county, even though they're pushing back against this, is totally clueless. This is not just a problem with Dominion. They would have the same vulnerability with any kind of electronic voting machine. They really didn't understand the bigger picture. They thought that if they got a different brand, that everything would be fine. That's not what it's about. Commissioners in Nevada were persuaded after a presentation by Jim Marchant,

a Republican candidate for Nevada Secretary of State, because that's what he would be doing, who falsely claimed voting machines were rigged against Trump in 2020. Again, you proved that they weren't with transparency and audit. And, you know, last week's interview, if you're in Indiana, take a quick look at Jeff Maurer. Vote for him for Secretary of State. I heartily endorse that guy.

He knows exactly what's going on. He'd be a good, independent person to look at this, but he understands what the issue is. The issue is transparency and auditing capability and the criminal partisanship that is evident in both parties. In Arizona, a county is being sued because they plan to count the ballots by hand. You see how crazy this is? This is upside down. The Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans said Cochise County officials are poised to violate the law if they do a hand count. And so they've asked the state judge to

block the plan. They said Arizona law clearly and expressly prohibits county officials from conducting a hand count audit of ballots beyond a limited sample size that is allowed by statute, let alone all the early ballots cast in the election. Again, what is it that you have to hide? That is all we have to ask. If you don't want anybody doing a hand count, if you don't want anybody doing an audit, if you destroy records as the Texas Board of Elections official did, he told all the counties, destroy all your facsimiles of this, even though it says in the Texas Board of Elections official had did. He told all the counties, destroy all your facsimiles of this, even though it says in the Texas Constitution,

they have to be preserved. And so he shut down, preemptively shut down the ability to audit. You can't even go back and get physical copies so that you can count the ballots. And of course, you know, ballots don't have anybody's names on them. It's not going to violate the secret ballot or anything like that. But he wiped out the ability to audit. And he's done that every election that he's been there. He was brought in by Rick Perry from Hillary Clinton's law firm, the Rose law firm in Arkansas. Nothing to see here, right?

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican, said the expanded hand count of 100% of the ballots is legal, provided that the hand count was limited to five contested statewide and federal races appearing on the 2022 general election ballot. Again, why would we make that something that is not allowed? Election deniers? Well, they're actually a plurality of America. This story from The New American, looking at a poll, saying that most people do not trust the results. Again, the burden of proof is on the government and any companies that are selling any gee whiz equipment

for hundreds of millions of dollars to prove that their stuff is honest, to show transparency in the audit capability. But no, they just want to be able to create chaos and uncertainty. We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. Stay with us. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Let's talk about some of the issues and why the Democrats are in such big trouble. Kathy Hochul is a good example of this.

The New York governor who was appointed, she's never been elected. She took over when Cuomo stepped down. She had been elected with him as lieutenant governor. And so she has essentially inherited the office and it looks like she's going to get booted out. She said, repealing bail reform is simplistic. It is a simple solution.

Why don't you embrace it? I mean, you have these criminals and it's been documented over and over again. But, you know, she says, well, that's just individual cases. They don't matter. Well, yes, they do. They're examples. They're individual examples. They're not isolated cases. You don't understand what she's saying here. It's just rare that somebody gets arrested for beating their wife. They get turned right back

out on the street without any bail and they turn around and kill her. He turns around and kills her. Just happened. She was so afraid of the guy that she was wearing a bulletproof vest and he shot her with a shotgun and killed her anyway in front of the three very young children. That's what happens when you don't lock up dangerous criminals and you get rid of bail. So Hochul responded to a question of whether or not she would repeal the state's bail reform law, as her opponent, Zeldin, had pointed out. As proposed. She says, just simplistic.

Someone who takes my kids every day on the subway of New York, said co-host Poppy Harlow, very close to where you are this morning. Homicides are down, but rapes are up. Robberies are up. Felony assault is up. You talked about your opponent not having any solutions. One thing that Lee Zeldin has said he would definitely do if he becomes governor is that he would, through executive order, repeal immediately the bail reform law that was passed.

You know, I had an interesting discussion with my brother-in-law who used to live in New York over the weekend. I told him I was going to talk about this, not bail reform, but about this particular case. I forget what brought the thing up. They were talking about crime or something in New York. And when he was living there decades ago, he said one day he's on the subway going to work as a group of thugs, teens, who got on the train and they're walking around. They got every, you know, that knock this person's hat off of their head and, you know, grab this person's umbrella and toss it or what, you know, just various things to mess with people. And he said, he just stared at him.

So he didn't look away. He didn't look down or anything. He stared at him like, come on, you know, and they didn't touch him, but they just were going all the way down the subway. But here's the punchline. He said, when they got to the end of the line, uh, the, um, uh, the, the announcement came on and I said, we have to pause here for a second. There's a bit of a technical difficulty before we go into the last, uh, station here. And they waited for a while. And what was happening, they found out was that, uh, the subway conductor or whoever

it was there, somebody had contacted the police, and they paused the subway there, told them it was a technical issue, would not go into the station until the police were there. And then they pulled in, opened the doors, and they got these guys. See, that's how the police are supposed to be used, and that's how they're not being used in New York. As a matter of fact, the word from unofficial sources are that Eric Adams, who is a former cop, he's the mayor of New York City right now. Insiders are saying he would not be unhappy if Hochul lost and Zeldin won. Multiple insiders told the New York Post that the mayor sees an opportunity to advance his initiatives on crime and public safety

if the Republican wins the neck-and-neck governor's race on Tuesday. He doesn't even have to lobby the Republicans, they said. They're all on his side when it comes to crime and bail reform, the NYPD, all this stuff. The two or three times that Eric Adams, the mayor of New York City, went up to Albany, the state capital, he had no issues with Republicans. They're all with him. The only issue he has is with these people who want to defund the police and get rid of bail.

By the way, he is already being set up as the fall guy for the losses in New York. Well, if we lose because of crime, it's Eric Adams' fault. He is far from perfect. He's got a lot of problems. And, you know, he was one of the worst COVID tyrants, among other things. But on this particular issue, he's right. And this is a big issue that could turn the election. And so he's not going to be responsible for this,

but they're going to try to pin this 100% on him as a scapegoat, I believe, is what is in the works here. But again, when we look at the election and the corruption and the uncertainty that is happening here, here's another example. Georgia County is mailing out over 1,000 absentee ballots just three days before the election. This is happening in Georgia, Cobb County, Georgia. And again, Georgia, the same place that we've had a lot of issues with this, and none of it was fixed. Nothing was taken care of. Politico is now warning of hackable voting equipment.

These are the people who said we could trust the election. So what is this telling you? I think what the, you see this being put out by the Washington post, by Politico, by NPR, by Reuters, by AP,

they're all saying it's going to take a very long time. Don't lose your trust in this. And you know, we could have some equipment that is hacked and all the rest of the stuff. They're laying the foundation to go back to when they denied the authenticity of the election in 2016. I think that's what this is truly about.

But in this article, they mention, I think curiously, the fact that there are cybersecurity units from the National Guard will be on hand in 14 states to help to counter any threats to election officials. Now, that I assume is true. This is coming from a suppress release from Brigadier General Gint Welsh, commander of the Washington Air National Guard, said in a virtual media briefing on November 4th, uh, the States are going to be Arizona, Iowa, Pennsylvania, as well as Colorado, Connecticut,

Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, North Carolina, New Mexico, New York, Washington,

and West Virginia, as reported by many different media outlets, as mentioned by the commander of the Washington air national guard. Now look, I said two days after the election, when Steve Pchenik went on Infowars with Owen Schroer and said, this whole thing was a sting, and the National Guard has already been deployed across the country.

We've got 20,000 guard units, and they're out there arresting people right now. It was a sting. We've got blockchain watermark ballots and quantum computers and all the rest of the stuff. Let's see. Can I think of any more buzzwords to throw in there? He threw the kitchen sink in there. I said, this is absolute nonsense. And I opposed him immediately on it. And I said, if this were true, we would know. You don't deploy tens of thousands of National Guards without it being reported.

Here's an example. And yet, Alex and Owen and Pachinik sold that lie over and over and over and over again, even past January the 20th. They kept pushing that nonsense. So, again, you would know if that were the case. It was all based on lie. But here's some of the real threats. It said, watch out if we have election offices that computers crashed,

and election offices, or if we have campaign websites that are crashed, or if we have the State Board of Elections crash, or if they go down, they come back,, you know, now we've got different results. Well, that's one of the things that they always do. Uh, look out if we've got campaign social media account hijacking. Oh, what do you mean by that? That's any different from all the censorship and manipulation that you've seen, you know, censorship versus pushing of a narrative that you see on Facebook and you've seen on Twitter and all the rest of these things for the longest time.

Cyber attacks on the voter registration databases, targeted voter harassment, and on and on. Well, that's Politico's list of these things, and they're not even anywhere close to the big issues. You would start, for example, with who's on the ballot. Ballot access, as I've said over and over again, is the way that you hack the election. You make sure that you've only got controlled candidates that are allowed on there. You make sure only the major parties are there.

And then the apparatchiks who are running that party will be able to purge out anybody that is going to challenge the globalists just as they did in Pennsylvania. Uh, you know, uh, didn't have the authentic candidate there supported. You make sure that you control access to the debates so that even if you've got an independent or third-party candidate on there, they're not allowed on the debates. You make sure you control access to social media, as we've seen. You make sure you access even control to campaign emails, as Republicans have complained. Google is shutting down, putting into spam, their campaign emails as Republicans have complained. Google is shutting down, putting into spam their campaign emails. You make sure you got access to the digital public square, especially

something like YouTube. But of course, none of those things are going to happen. And that's why this is something that has been rolling out for quite some time. And this is why, you know, with all these people who say, well, you trust the election, trust the election. There's a lot of very simple things that need to be done. We don't need to make permanent this vote by mail stuff that Trump put in. Trump put it in. Don't complain about it, you know, mafia Don.

You're the one who put it in. Unbelievable. We get rid of that. We open up the ballots. We open up the debates. We open up social media. It's very simple, right? Just stop the censorship.

Stop the control. Stop all that. Add transparency. It's kind of like the founder of Lotus, right? Simplify and add lightness, he said, about his cars. Well, fix the elections. You simplify them and you add light. Light.

Shine some light on the process. We go full Lotus on this. Uh, so, uh, yeah, it's, um, we'll end up with this thing here before we talk about something different. Uh, Babylon B voters send a strong message to career politicians by voting for

slightly different career politicians. Yeah. Voters have made their opinion clear by voting with their feet. Voters are done with leeches who have lived off the public dime for years Now, voters have made their opinion clear by voting with their feet. Voters are done with leeches who have lived off the public dime for years without effectively representing their constituencies, and will be selecting slightly different leeches. For real change, we need to get rid of this Harvard guy and replace him with a Yale guy. The dark horse candidate will upset the establishment. He has the exact same political appointments,

but he was coming from a different place, right? He was an education commissioner instead of an alderman, so it'll be totally different. But notice that. He had the exact same political appointments. This is how we knew that the fix was in from the very beginning with Trump. During the transition period,

Trump filled his administration with Goldman Sachs and generals. We knew exactly where this thing was going right there at that point. We'll be right back. ¶¶ You're listening to The David Knight Show. Geesebusters, Geesebusters. Thank you very much for the tip. And he writes, in my opinion, Kathy Hochul belongs in a mental institution in a padded cell where she can't hurt herself and others. Well, that'd be a start, wouldn't it? Kathy Hochul belongs in a mental institution in a padded cell where she can't hurt herself and others. Let me start with it.

Just put her on the subway and she'll run out of town. State probably after one trip on the subway without her Praetorian guards that are surrounding her all the time. I want to talk a little bit about what's going on with war. Because, you know, this is not, strangely, an issue that has been talked about. With a balance of power in Congress, Congress has the authority to declare war. Congress has the ability to spend money. Congress should have the final say as to whether or not we're going to give twice as much money to Ukraine as the entire Russian defense budget.

They should have a say in this. So why isn't anybody asking them any questions? See, this is how the media is controlled. They don't even ask questions about this. This election will turn on crime and the economy. But nobody wants to point out that the economy has turned on the basis of the green reset. And nobody wants to point out that the economy has turned on the basis of the green reset. And nobody wants to talk about war, which is the greatest crime and the greatest blow to our prosperity.

Nobody wants to talk about that. You know, as I look at this article from RT, the Dead Hand's Nuclear Revenge. I was struck with how spot on this is in terms of Dr. Strangelove. I mean, this, it's like it came straight out of the movie. And in case you don't remember, here's a short clip to show you. The surface of the Earth will be as dead as the moon.

Come on, you're a sad student. Ridiculous. Our studies show that even the worst fallout is down to a safe level after two weeks. You've obviously never heard of cobalt thorium, gee. When they are exploded, they will produce a doomsday shroud, a lethal cloud of radioactivity which will encircle the Earth for 93 years. What a load of commie bull. I mean, after all. Afraid I don't understand something, Alexei.

Is the Premier threatening to explode this if our planes carry out their attack? No, sir. It is not a thing a sane man would do. The doomsday machine is designed to trigger itself automatically. But surely you can disarm it somehow? No. It is designed to explode

if any attempt is ever made to untrigger it. Automatically? It's an obvious commie trick, Mr. President. We're wasting valuable time. Look at the big one. They're getting ready to clobber us. But this is absolute madness, Ambassador. Why should you build such a thing? There were those of us who fought against it, but in the end we could not keep up with the expense involved in the arms race, the space race, and the peace race. And at the same time, our people grumbled for more nylons and washing machines. Our doomsday scheme cost us just a small fraction

of what we'd been spending on defense in a single year. But the deciding factor was when we learned that your country was working along similar lines, and we were afraid of a doomsday gap. This is preposterousous i've never approved of anything like that our source was the new york times so there you go it's got to be real right our source was the new york times yeah you know there are people in russia they wanted those nylons and the washing machines how'd they get those nylons well they got it from uh you know

ultimately from oil uh how did they get the ability to build the washing machines? Well, they need to have energy to do that. They got to have energy to actually run the washing machines, which now they're shutting those things down in the UK. Yeah, we'll pay you not to run your washing machines. We'll pay you to go back into the Middle Ages. How about that? The de-industrialization of the West.

But let's stay on the nuclear aspect here now the dead hands nuclear revenge is the headline from rt what would happen if the west launched an attack on russia and it is straight out of that movie now you will see this story coming out of russia and I'm sure that it's just debunked in the U.S., just like General Buck Sturgison. You know, that's a bunch of commie bull. We can survive a nuclear blast. You know, that stuff, right? Recently, the U.S. Army's former European commander, Ben Hodges, warned that his country would retaliate with a devastating strike against Russia if Moscow used its nuclear capability in Ukraine.

Hodges, now a lobbyist at a pressure group funded by U.S. arms makers to promote and maintain NATO expansion in Europe, that group is CEPA, said Washington could target the Black Sea fleet or destroy Russia's bases in Crimea. In 1984, Konstantin Chernenko, a 72-year-old party worker, former head of Brezhnev's apparatus, who was sick with end-stage emphysema, became the leader of the Soviet Union. And afterwards, you had many people talk about how they were concerned about his state of health and what he might do.

The leader of a great power turned out to be not just a physically weak, but a seriously ill person. Actually, a disabled person wrote his successor, Gorbachev, in one of his books. But Chernenko couldn't even read a piece of paper. He stuttered, not understanding a thing he was reading. Now, we're talking about the Soviet Union, not about the Biden administration, okay? But the shoe is on the other foot now, I guess. So what if Chernenko, described as a bent figure, trembling hands, a breaking voice calling for discipline and selfless work,

sheets of paper falling from his hands, as described by Gorbachev, what if he had to make a decision on the nuclear counterattack? Well, the people who were in charge of the system at the time decided that they would come up with a dead-hand system. They said the thinking was, you know, if I'm going down, I'm taking everybody with me. That approach was a way of proving that there could not and should not be winners in a future world war. That was mutually assured destruction. That was what you just saw there with Dr. Strangelove. The doomsday system.

The doomsday system. In 1984, right after Chininco became the new Soviet leader, Valery Yarinich, a colonel in the elite strategic missile forces, acquired a new position, that of deputy head of the main directorate of missile weapons. It was this colonel who was entrusted with perfecting a flawed system, partially automated, that would launch intercontinental ballistic missiles in a retaliatory strike if the Soviet leadership had been decapitated in a nuclear bombing.

They called it perimeter, or informally they called it the dead hand. And this was done in 1983. It's almost as if they had watched Dr. Strangelove from Stanley Kubrick. The Soviet Union could not have been the one to launch a nuclear ICBM at the Americans first. In this scenario, just like Dr. Strangelo, the U.S. would have had enough forces left to inflict significant damage in a retaliatory strike with the remaining means at its disposal. It was also dangerous to launch missiles after detecting American warheads heading toward the USSR, since by that time there had already been several cases of false alarms from warning systems. So the only way left was to strike back only after confirming an attack by the enemy. But this was overly dependent on the state of mind of the General Secretary.

He could be frightened, he could be confused, he could be too slow to act, he could believe it to be another false alarm. So they created the doomsday machine. Straight out of Dr. Strangelove. All that the general secretary had to do after receiving any information about an enemy strike was to place perimeter, that is the dead hand, on alert. After that, the fate of humankind passed into the hands of officers who would have to make a decision. They were isolated in a special spherical bunkers,

so deep underground that even a nuclear strike could not destroy them. These officers had a list of three criteria for launching an attack. Without going into any more detail, you get the gist of this, right? And yet, where are we today? Is the dead hand dead? Well, they said Jarnitsch was the one to blow the whistle on perimeter after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. And so, is it dead?

Are we going to be dead? You know, look at the reaction of the U.S. And look at how the guy who is the U.S. nuclear forces chief sounds like he's General Buck Turgison straight out of Dr. Strangelove. The U.N., the U.S. nuclear forces chief says, the big one's coming. Calling the war in Ukraine a warm-up for the big one. He said, this Ukraine crisis we're in right now, this is just a warm-up, says Navy Admiral Charles Rickert, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, STRATCOM, we call it Strategic Command.

The big one's coming, and it's going to be a very, and it isn't going to be very long before we're going to get tested in ways that we haven't been tested in a long time. So he reaffirmed the U.S. doctrine that allows for the first strike use of nuclear weapons. As head of STRATCOM, he has previously warned that the risk of nuclear war with Russia and China is a real possibility, quote-unquote. He said last year that the U.S. military must shift the principal assumption from nuclear employment is not possible to nuclear

employment is a very real possibility in order to act and to meet and to deter that reality. So, are we headed toward nuclear war? Just to recount what has happened in the last few months. February the 24th, you had Putin not so subtly stating that, this is Daily Skeptic, not so subtly stating that, quote, Russia remains one of the most powerful nuclear states. Any potential aggressor will face defeat, ominous consequences, should it directly attack our country. Three days later, he ordered the military to put Russia's nuclear forces on high alert.

On October the 6th, Zelensky said, we need preventative strikes so that they'll know what will happen to them if they use nukes. Now, that was so provocative that it wasn't reported by the mainstream media. It was so provocative that Biden went on air with his foot firmly planted in his mouth and said, we've not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis. And then the U.S. press was able to ignore Zelensky and chide Biden for his inaccurate speech, because everybody knows that Biden has inaccurate speech. But Zelensky was saying exactly what Zelensky wanted. We want you to preemptively start a nuclear war. So, you know, this is where Then on October the 8th

A large explosion on the Kerch Bridge, remember? Caused part of the roadway to collapse Russia retaliated by attacking infrastructure, government buildings And several Ukrainian cities They're now bombing their infrastructure back into the Stone Age Could the escalatory spiral continue to the point where Russia uses nuclear weapons? In a recent article, physicist and a person who calls himself an existential risk expert, Max Tegmark, argues that it could.

Now, he's created an interesting chart there that you can see on the screen. And so he's got a David versus Goliath type of scenario. And if you go to the left there, that is de-escalation to the left. So he said, you know, this could be de-escalated. We could have kind of a Kosovo idea where you have a breakaway that succeeds. You could have a de-escalation that was like the Finland where you had an enduring peace, or like Korea where you have a frozen war, no resolution. You could have something like Libya where you have a simmering war. You could have Vietnam where the Goliath is defeated. Or you could go the other way, and you could have a first-strike nuclear weapon.

And then he says, we got a 30% chance of that happening. And then if we, if that happens, we got a 20% chance of it going back and deescalating. Uh, he says after that happens, there is a,

according to him, an 80% chance of expansion, uh, where we have conventional NATO directly engaging Russia. If that happens, he sees only a 30% chance of turning back and a 70% chance of full-on global nuclear war. Now, it makes a lot of assumptions. Again, all these chances, the 30% chance of this and a 70% chance of that,

you can't quantify it, really. But he said in this article, Daily Skeptic, he said there is a 70% chance, he says, that the West will launch a conventional non-nuclear response such as destroying the Black Sea fleet. If that happens, there's an 80% chance of World War III. If you multiply all these numbers together, you would get a one in six chance of a nuclear war. He says, well, I don't think the chance of Russia using tactical nukes is as high as 30%. The metaculous prediction market says the chance is seven percent, while another market, the manifold markets, give it 19 percent. But both of those figures are lower than Tegmark's, but they're not that much lower. Tegmark's numbers may be too pessimistic, but his framing of the

problem seems to be about right. And that's where we are right now. That's what these people have done to us. And yet, isn't it strange that that's not an issue in the election? Isn't it strange that with all the talk about corruption from both sides and lack of transparency and auditing capability, that nobody wants to turn back and get rid of the vote-by-mail stuff that's been imposed.

Yeah, we had absentee ballots before. That's a very different thing. Very different in scope and scale and how it is handled. Very, very different. Now, this vote-by-mail thing, that came in with Trump and the lockdowns. And it is a bipartisan thing. Nobody wants to fix it. They want to complain about it.

They want to use it to create chaos and division. Because they want war. They don't just want a global nuclear war. They want civil war. We have to make sure they don't get either one of them. But it is odd, isn't it? That the press, the media doesn't want to talk about it. The politicians don't want to talk about war and peace. They don't want to talk about the pandemic. They don't want to talk about the executive orders. They don't want to talk about setting down some new guardrails to actually defend our freedom. The silence is deafening. And as Sherlock Holmes said, it's the dog that didn't bark that really tells you what's going on in this isn't it well before we take a break uh guard goldsmith thank you very much for the tip he says thanks for bringing light david to

a trove of issues thanks for going full lotus can't wait to hear eric been eager to send a big smile for your rover story yesterday yeah the guard and i are big fans of um of uh the prisoner series vote for six he knows what that's about for sure if any if no no nobody else does guard and i are in on that joke even though the underlying dangers to freedom seem to be creeping closer and closer to the village it made me cheer and laugh be seeing you yeah whenever i do that you know do that in one report, one time talking about the election stuff, probably back in 2012, I did that. The, the be seeing you from the village thing, people that look at that, he's

doing this Illuminati thing and it's like, no, that's not what that's from. Um, but, uh, you know, everybody's got multiple things that they attach to multiple graphics or hand signs or anything else. We're gonna take a quick break and we're going to connect with eric peters so stay with us we will be right back We'll meet again. Don't know when. Don't know when. But I know we'll meet again. Some sunny day.

Smiling through. Just like you. Morning, David. Hey, how you doing, Eric? Great to have you on. Well, thank you for having me. It's a good day to do it. I guess we're going to find out whether the threat to our democracy is real. That's right.

We can talk about that's your cognitive cripples and things like that. So let's talk. Please say hello to the folks that I know. Tell them I won't be long. They'll be happy to know that as you saw me go, I was singing this song. We'll meet again. Don't go away. Don't know where Don't know when But I know we'll meet again Some sunny day

Okay, and as we play out the world-ending thermonuclear war, the dead end and the doomsday device, and complete silence from both parties about the escalation into World War III and many other things, joining us now is Eric Peters, epautos.com. Eric has always been on point when it comes to liberty and mobility, and those two things are inextricably linked together. Thank you for joining us, Eric. Thanks for having me, David.

I guess we're all waiting with bated breath to see whether the threat to our democracy is real. Exactly. Yeah, they're going to go thermonuclear. They've already warned us that there's not going to be any results for many days. And I said earlier in the program, I said, isn't it strange that with all of these computerized systems and everything, they now have messed up the election so much that we can't get results for many, many days, even though we used to be able to do that the same day when we hand counted the ballots and had a few voting machines that were mechanical, wasn't any problem. Now we got the mail out election that Trump put in place and that has

really messed things up. And I think that's locked in. I think it's another one of these things like the executive order about a state of emergency for COVID. They're never going to take it off. I don't think they're ever going to fix this mail thing and both sides will just use it. Yeah. These precedentsents once they're set are incredibly difficult to roll back that's been a problem in our politics for for many generations you know it's a you can see it embodied in things like repeal and replace obamacare as opposed to just get rid of the thing yeah exactly yeah i said uh it was an interesting thing that i came across and it went back to the early 1800s, and it was a quote by somebody criticizing conservatives.

And they said, for conservatives, policies are not determined by truth, they're determined by time. If something is left in place long enough, then it becomes true, and they grab a hold of it, even though it was completely false to start with? Well, there's a kind of a babbitry involved. It's sort of a low-rent utilitarianism in that conservatives, typically not all of them but many of them, will not refer to a principle and use that as the foundation for whatever the particular thing happens to be. So they just will say things like, well, this works better than our opponent's plan,

as opposed to, you know, that plan that they're talking about is wrong, and here's why, and we shouldn't do this at all. I agree. Well, you know, you've got an article, If the Left Wins. How do you see this happening? You know, what is, there's a lot of very, very key issues that there's not a dime's worth of difference between the Republicans and the Democrats, but there are some issues.

What do you see as the determining factor if the left wins versus the right? Well, it'll be an affirmation of everything that's gone on for the past three years. You know, whether it's legitimate or not, they're going to claim it is. And then what they'll do afterward is frame anybody who questions it, which they've already done, as a threat to our democracy. I read something a couple of days ago about proposals that are being put out, you know, you probably follow these things as closely as I do, to take it up a notch with regard to what the left calls misinformation, and to criminalize it. So instead of simply canceling you from Twitter or deplatforming you, they'll pursue you

criminally if you question them in any way, shape, or form. Oh yeah. Yeah, that's rolling out in various places around the world. You've got their deputized agents. We need to start talking about not just the deep state of the permanently entrenched bureaucrats, but we need to talk about the deputized state, all these corporations who act at the behest of the government, and they're not even trying to hide it anymore. I mean, they're writing letters, they're talking to them at open hearings and all the rest of the stuff about what they want them to do, and they want them to do what they are prohibited from doing themselves,

but it's still wrong for the corporations to do it at their behest. And so we've got to point that out, I think. Yeah, and not only is it very overt, but it's very vague. They will say that you have violated community guidelines, or, again, you're spreading misinformation. Nothing specific. Nothing that says, well, you told a lie or an untruth about X. Just misinformation, and that's it.

And at that point, they, like, for example, in the case of PayPal, will simply seize your money. I mean, that was a shot across the bow. And I think a lot of people have awakened to what these people have in mind for us. And that's a good thing. But at the same time, it's a really scary thing. Well, and I think what is interesting is that after it was a shot across the bow, and when they did it to the Daily Skeptic and the Free Speech Union

and the guy who was runs both of those things all three at the same time he got a lot of attention from uk politicians and from the uk mainstream media they didn't like that and paypal retrenched and said oh that was a mistake uh we didn't mean to put that out and of course that was a ridiculous uh thing for nobody believed that at all and then after everything went quiet for a couple of days, they reintroduced it, Eric. They put it back in. Just so we know that these people are never going to give up. They're going to keep coming back and coming back and coming back, aren't they?

Yeah, even more virulently at the end of the day. And, gosh, you know, there's so many facets to this. If, let's say, the red tsunami happens, I don't think it's beyond improbable that they will then declare that there's an insurrection going on and a threat to our democracy. And God knows only what they're going to do on the basis of that. And even more alarming, keep in mind that even if the red tsunami happens, these people are still going to wield the levers of power for the next two months. And what do you imagine that they're going to do during that period? Oh, yeah. Yeah. I've said that it's really going to be, we've got a perfect storm that's coming because the Mississippi is way down. It's basically turned that multi-lane highway into just a two-lane road as if it was

under construction because of the drop in the level. And then you've got a rail strike, which Biden went to the union leaders and bought them off or whatever he had to do, really upset the rank and file union members to postpone that until after the election. He has been emptying out the strategic petroleum reserve at an unprecedented rate. I mean, it's only been about three times they pulled the stuff out. He's done it more than 10 times what the previous high was. And so, you know, all of that is going to stop. So, you know, the artificial deflation, temporary deflation of oil and gas prices are going to go away. You're going to have problems with rail. You're going to have problems with shipping with the

Mississippi and that type of thing. We've already got massive shortfalls of diesel on the East Coast and everything. All this stuff is going to be coming together all at once in that period of time before the Republicans even take office in January. Yeah, something like 26, I think, or even 30 million barrels of diesel shy. And there's no conceivable way to bring that up to speed between now and, say, Thanksgiving. So I think the plan is to pin the tail on the Republican donkey, at the very least.

If they do get washed out by a red tsunami, then all of these things that have been set in motion by them will result in a catastrophe that they can then claim, oh, look, you didn't vote for us, and this is what you get. Exactly. As a matter of fact, you got an article that you just put up, the next two months. Talk about that and the parallels that you see going back to the 1860 election, just before the Civil War. Well, yeah, we're in this very dangerous historical moment, I think,

that's very comparable in a lot of ways to what happened in 1860 when Abraham Lincoln was elected. And the people in the South realized that they no longer had representation and they had no longer any means of redressing their grievances within the system because simply the North's population and monetary influence was so overwhelming that they knew that going forward within the system, they stood no chance whatsoever of their interests being acknowledged, you know, let alone deferred to. So they decided to withdraw from what styled the Union. And, you know, one of the things that I find fascinating about that is it's exactly what the American colonies did.

They withdrew from the Union with Great Britain. We celebrate that, or most people do, on the Fourth of July, but somehow when the South did it, it was somehow a criminal act. It's really quite an example of cognitive dissonance. Yeah, our country was founded on secession. Yeah, right. And we've seen that over and over again. You see that when everybody freaked out in 2014 when you had the engineered coup in Ukraine, and Crimea said, you know, we've been with Russia for several hundred years, so we want to stay with them. They said, you can't do

that. Ukraine can secede from Russia, but Crimea can't secede from Ukraine. Take a look at the Civil War. You have West Virginia. After Virginia seceded, West Virginia said, no, we want to stay. It was exactly the same situation. The hypocrisy is just astounding, isn't it? It's absolutely astounding. And so we enter this very precarious moment in time where people are faced with the realization that the system no longer not only doesn't represent them, but it doesn't have the possibility of representing them any further. If the left does manage to win, if they jigger the election, what are we supposed to do? How do we work within the system? Our choice becomes simply submit and

obey and do what they tell us or figure out a way to withdraw. So that's the parallel between today and 1860. I agree. And I've talked about this many times to the audience. You know, you talked about the American Revolution, talked about the Civil War. Both of those were fourth turnings, if you're familiar with Strauss and how people coined the term millennial right and so when you look at that uh it was kind of interesting to me that um uh when i realized that italy had a civil war at exactly the same time as our civil war it was not about slavery slavery was a component of it uh because it was involved in the agrarian society and the decentralized society being changed into a nation state that was based on

the industrial revolution but what was happening everywhere was the creation of nation states from decentralized agrarian powers and it was being done as part of the industrial revolution and i think underscoring that eric is if you go back and you look at uh the early 1830s they had what was called the nullification crisis at that time. And it almost kicked off a civil war, but the people's attitudes weren't set up for that at that point in time. So they backed it down. You had a massive increase in tariffs that the South didn't want. They wanted open trade because they were exporting, but the protectionist industrial interests did want that. And so it came up to a point where they said, well, if you're going to put those tariffs on it, we're going to nullify that.

And if you stop the nullification, we're going to secede. And so that was all walked back. Andrew Jackson walked that back. But it happened again 30 years later because the people were primed for it by that time. They had lost all interest and hope in and belief in the institutions. And I just had this last week, a guy who's a libertarian running in Indiana, Jeff Maurer, he's running for Secretary of State. And he was very articulate, very bright, understood exactly what the situation was. And he said, look, we've got to restore some transparency and trust in the system.

We're going to have something like the Civil War. And that really is a hallmark of these fourth turnings. Everybody's lost any faith in the institutions, and the institutions themselves are not worthy of having any faith in them. Yeah, well, Jefferson, I think, used the phrase, the long train of abuses, to characterize the exasperation that people felt by the 1770s. You know, it wasn't as if the revolution occurred in 1775 or 76. It had taken about 20 years for it to coalesce with people's frustrations, and they tried everything they could, as we're trying today, because nobody wants violence.

Nobody wants any of this because it's bad news for everybody. But a point comes when what's the alternative? You keep getting pushed and pushed and pushed, and there's no longer anything that you can do about it. And that's the danger. And to get to your point about legitimacy, you know, for people of goodwill on both sides of the aisle, wouldn't you want to have transparency? Wouldn't you want to have an open way of counting actual votes and verifying the people who

voted for them so that we all know, look, the result was honest. I think most people would be willing to accept that if they knew, look, yeah, this guy won. It's legitimate. It's equitable. So that's fine. But right now, nobody trusts what's going on and with good reason. That's right. And so what you have with Washington Post and NPR and Politico and all, they say, well, you know, look at this. This is an existential issue for Dominion and for ESS and ES&S and all these rest of these companies. It's like, well, their job, their first job ought to be, you know, their first priority ought to be, let's create a system that just, that isn't just about

counting votes. Anybody can count votes. Let's create a system that is capable of being audited. Let's have a system that has transparency and that type of thing. That's what we ought to be paying for if they're going to charge us tens of millions of dollars for these things. That's their responsibility. That's their job, number one, is to show us so that we can believe in the count that you give us. If you're going to hide that stuff and if you're going to sue anybody that complains about your corrupt system that you are trying to hide all this stuff from people, if you're going to

sue, your response is going to be to sue people for billions of dollars for talking about that. Your job, you had one job, and that was to show people that your account could be trusted. And they refused to do that, and nobody wants to hold them to that standard. Right. And you know, the DMV does a fairly good job of establishing people's identity, doesn't it? I mean, the DMV is incompetent at practically everything, but it seems able to do that. And so if the DMV can do it, why can't the election system do it? Oh, yeah. I talk about this every time we have an election. Going back to 2012 in North Carolina, you are banned. You know, they've got this federal, you know, as the judiciary say, well, you can't ask for ID for voting

because that goes back to Jim Crow and it's racist and all this other kind of stuff, right? And they can, they allow voter ID in other states, but it can't be done in the South. And so in North Carolina, we had one of the longest voting periods of time, no voter ID. And so in 2012, a friend of my brother-in-law's went in to vote and he gave him his name and his address and they'd look him up in their printout. And they said, well, you've already voted.

And so has this other person at your address. And he goes, well, that's my mom. She's been dead for years. Uh, you know, that's what you wind up with in this kind of a situation.

And it's very easily remedied. It's not racist. If you ask for ID, they have to show ID to do everything. They have to, especially to the government. Now, this is the government that say,

you got to show me your vaccine record before I let you do anything. Oh, but don't show me anything when you go to vote. I don't want to know. Isn't it incredibly condescending, even racist, to suggest that black people somehow are walking around there in the millions without IDs, that they're too benighted to go to a DMV and get a driver's license, or even just the equivalent, the DMV issues, IDs. How do you even function in this society? Get a job, go to the bank without an ID. It's impossible. So it's really insulting for them to claim that people don't have IDs and that if they're required to present them, that somehow that is racist. I agree. I agree. Well, you

mentioned Jefferson's Declaration of Independence. Of course, one of the things he said was they have harassed our people and eaten out their substance with swarms of officers. And here we have the Biden administration talking about increasing the IRS by a factor of seven. He wants the IRS to be seven times bigger than it is now, drowning them with cash, hiring 80,000 officers, a swarm of them, as a matter of fact, to harass our people and eat out their substance. What do you think Jefferson would say about that? But more importantly, what do you think the Republicans are going to do, if anything, about that?

Well, Jefferson would be speechless and appalled. And, of course, I don't think even a man as literate and as articulate as he would be able to deal with it for a couple of minutes. He'd have to probably catch his breath. But as far as the Republicans, you know, ordinarily, I would expect them to sit back and do what they always do, which is essentially nothing, or to do 50% of what's already been done and consider that a win. But I think this time that's not going to fly. I think if there is the red tsunami and these people are voted in by an angry, desperate, and terrified population and they do nothing, they are going to go the way of the Whig Party and it's going to be a catastrophe for them. I

think people aren't going to tolerate just talk anymore. Yeah. I hope they do something about it. My concern is, you know, some of them have talked about this explosion of the IRS and these agents and that type of thing. But, you know, Eric, none of them have talked about Biden's full on CBDC, central bank digital currency. And, you know, he started this back in March and the thing gave every agency something to do, gave them six months to come back to him with a report about what they were tasked to do. And he broke things up into four different groups. You had some of the people like the treasury department redesign our financial system. Okay. And get back to me in six months. Another group, how do you implement this in terms of the computer code? Another group, how do you enforce this law enforcement, you know, get out the rubber hose and beat people into this. And then the fourth one was how are we going to sell this to people as something that is green? It's going to replace

the cryptocurrency, which is using too much energy. We're not going to have to do any proof of work. So we're not going to use any energy. We'll just say it's a fiat statement. So he's got these four different areas and every agency and government was tasked with coming up with one of these things. Now, the Republicans have not said one word about that. And my concern, Eric, is that that's ultimately what these 80,000 IRS agents and this gargantuan helicopter cash dump onto the agency is really about for the enforcement pushing people into the CBDC. What do you think about that? Well, it may well be, and if it is, I don't know that they'll even need them because everything will then be centralized and automated and electronicized so that every transaction that you make down to buying a can of pop in a machine

will be duly noted and automatically debited too. And I think the way that they're going to reduce the carbon footprint is simply by limiting economic activity. They've already talked about doing that. So, you know, if you're making a purchase, let's say, oh, you can't buy that SUV. It uses too much gas. And, you know, they'll prohibit you from doing that or they'll punish you for doing it. That's exactly the sort of regime that they have in mind here. I agree. Yeah, they're obviously not going to need them to, uh, you know, assess income taxes to us or any of that other kind of stuff. They'll be able to control,

uh, and prohibit, uh, anything that they don't agree with telling you where you can buy things, what you can buy, when you can buy all that type of thing. But I do think they need the IRS to confiscate our wealth. They need them to take an inventory of everything that we've got.

Uh, so they then come around at any point in time and steal it from us or to come up with some certain, some ways that they can steal whatever we've got, whatever property we've got. And so I don't think it's going to just be like a revenue that they're going to be looking at. It's not going to be income that they're looking at. It's going to be your possessions that they're going to be looking at. Oh, sure.

And in particular, I think that they'll use those agents to go after the barter economy. Yes, exactly. Because that's what people will naturally do when they want to opt out of the system, is deal with one another in that manner, and they'll use the IRS to curb-stomp that. I absolutely agree. That's what I think they're for. Let's talk about one area that I think that there might be some change, even though I'm not sure if it's really going to work or not. You know, the Republicans are not focused on completely destroying all oil and coal and everything else. But they're also afraid to take on the green giant, if you will, right?

And so we're here in the valley of the jolly green giant, and they don't want to push back against any of that stuff because I don't want to get stomped on. But at the same time, you know, well, let's not move as quickly as the Democrats or Davos wants us to move. What do you think is going to happen with that? I mean, if they can't put out a sense for the oil companies, for example, that, yes, you can build refineries and you'll be able to make a profit for it. That's why the CEO of Chevron said there'll never be another refinery built in the U.S. Will there be another refinery built in the U.S. if the GOP wins, you think? Well, maybe. You know, they may take a lesson from the past three years.

You know, when some of us stood firm with regard to the face diapering and then the vaccines and showed that resistance is not futile and that this whole thing is kind of a Potemkin facade and can be pushed back against and then toppled over. That's happened with regard to the diapers and the vaccines to a very great extent. And I think the same can happen with regard to this whole climate change shibboleth, because it's being pushed by the same people for the same reasons, with the same sort of malignant distortions, lies, and hysteria. And if you simply rebut them with fact you know i really talk to people

about this and i ask them do you know what the uh... percentage of the earth's atmosphere is the constitutes carbon dioxide and of course it's a zero point oh four percent approximately fraction here if they think the next follow-up question is well how does increasing or decreasing that fraction of a percent by a fraction of a percent cause a catastrophic climate change. And then while they're, you know, while they're rolling that around in their heads, I asked them,

can you give me a specific example of how you have been negatively impacted by the climate crisis? And of course, they never can. So, you know, by doing that sort of a thing, perhaps you can begin to spread some doubt and questions just as, hey, you know, why are you wearing that stupid mask over your face or under your chin? You know, why are you taking a vaccine that they now admit doesn't immunize you? You know, I mean, you can challenge this stuff, and it just takes a little bit of guts to reject the gaslighting and the false moralizing that's coming from these people. Oh, I agree. I agree. And those are great questions to ask people. And, of course, now they're coming after, you know, carbon dioxide is such a small part. And of course it is necessary for plants, that small part that's there. And the only way you're going to get rid of all of it is to kill everybody and all the animals. But, you know, they want to get rid of nitrogen now as well. Nitrogen, which is a big percentage of the atmosphere. I mean, it's just like going after

flu, colds, respiratory illnesses. You know, we've got to stop all that stuff. And if we don't, it's going to be, I'm going to have to have a medical martial law because there's a flu strain out there somewhere. Yeah. Well, the thing to understand is they're not going after nitrogen or carbon dioxide or any of that stuff. They're going after us. That's right. That's right. That's right. It's just an excuse. It's not about the emissions. It's about what they can omit out of our lives. You got an article at epautos.com, helps protect. Talk about that with the vaccine. That's the way they're going to sell it next, right? You know, we're all familiar with those oily ads that you see on TV where they'll tell you, if you buy this pill, you could lose up to 50 pounds in three days.

That's the kind of advertising shysterism that you see on late-night TV, and now it's being used to peddle these vaccines that aren't. Instead of claiming that they immunize, which they implied and even directly stated when they were first rolled out, remember that? If you take these vaccines, you can't get, and you won't spread the horrible virus. Well, they didn't imply that. They said that. They said, oh, no, you're not going to die.

You can't spread it. You can't get it, and all the rest of this stuff. Yeah, so now that that's been proven to be a flat-out lie, they've shifted ground like they do. It's playing whack-a-mole with these people. Now it helps protect. Well, what does that mean? How much? How so? It's just incredible to me that people continue to swallow this stuff up. And the effrontery of it, the way they keep pushing it, and this commercial I looked at, it's a government commercial, a PSA for these vaccines that aren't,

that I embedded with my article. And it's insipid. You know, the whole thing about, you know, like somebody sneezes, you've got to jump back from them. And, oh, we've got to have these things to help protect. It's nauseating. Yeah. Yeah, it is. And, you know, when you look at the lunatics that are pushing this stuff, the Extinction

Rebellion and the Just Stop Oil People. This just happened in the Paris Motor Show. I was surprised, not by what these activist idiots did, but by the fact that there was a Paris Motor Show. I know. For how much longer, we don't know. Exactly. It isn't going to be helped by the fact that you've got these radical lunatics, these youthful idiots coming in and covering cars with black paint and gluing their hands to the cars and stuff like that.

I mean, it's absolutely lunatic what they paintings and epically failing as well, you know, because they don't realize that they got protective glass on them as they're trying to, you know, rub their head with whatever they've anointed themselves with on the painting. Uh,

but you know, the epic failure from these people. And they don't realize how of all, uh, things to attack these works of art, they're going to alienate the people that they're actually trying to reach out to on the left. Well, they have the mentality of little children.

When a little child doesn't get its way, you take its toy away and tell it it's time for bed, the child will sometimes stamp its feet, scream, and yell. That's what they do in lieu of discussing and arguing and presenting facts and logic. I don't like it. I'm not happy. I'm stomping my feet and screaming to make you do what i say that's right yeah and that's what some of the one wave of these guys uh it's a couple of weeks ago went into a porsche uh room and a showroom and uh glued themselves their hands to the floor

and that was too funny yeah then they complained because the thermostat wasn't warm enough for them and they couldn't go to the bathroom yeah they complained because porsche did not provide them with a bucket yeah well i said at the time i said uh if they get their way none of us will have a bucket to piss in you know because it's true they want to take everything from us it's unbelievable the infantilism of these people you know they they uh they take, I guess, because they've never thought about it, because they don't think they feel the fact that they are in a warm house with a refrigerator that's full of food, and that they've never known a day of being hungry in their lives.

And they just accept these things as givens, as mana, that just appear magically. And we'll always have these things, and we can have a clean earth, too. It's the kind of thing that you'd expect from a not particularly bright 8-year-old. Yeah, exactly. You got a review on the Toyota RAV4. Let's talk about that. Because, again, I like the fact that you don't do – last week I talked about in the UK they're getting rid of the small um, um, it's a, the small Ford.

I can't even remember which one it was. Uh, I think it's the focus. It was the most popular car ever sold in the UK and they've gone through like eight or nine generations of it. And so they're killing it. Right. And they had all of these pictures going back to the sixties and seventies and everything, you know, showing the design the design and uh how they had made a

small car big on the inside and all this other kind of stuff it's like you put a lot of uh design into this thing because it's a mass market uh thing but they're going to kill that now and what is taking its place well uh you know just right below that is an article about lotus's uh 90 000 pound and that's uh's British pounds, not its weight, but it probably goes to that, but the Lotus SUV. And I said, what could be more unloaded than a giant SUV loaded with batteries? Yeah. Lotus that built its reputation on building extremely light, extremely simple, very

engaging to drive vehicles. But what fascinates me most about what's happening right now is that there's this inversion of history. You know, at the dawn of the automobile age, when the first cars were being made, they were being made by hand, largely, and they were, for that reason, very expensive. And for that reason, they were primarily the indulgences of the extremely affluent. Then Henry Ford came along and he simplified them, and he made them more affordable, and so that practically anybody could afford a car once the Model T came onto the market.

And that set the stage for the whole future, 100 years to come. Now, what's happening, and it's happening artificially, not as a result of any kind of market demand, cars are once again being transformed into very expensive indulgences of the extremely affluent, and everybody else is going to be taken out of their cars and put onto the bus or onto a bicycle or walk to where they need to go. Oh, yeah. At Travis's wedding a couple weeks ago, I had a relative who wanted to engage me on electric cars and green mandates and all the rest of this stuff.

He's perfectly capable of affording whatever expensive cars come out. And he said, yeah, that's just the way it is. The rich people are going to rule. That's just the way it is. And he says, in the beginning, everybody was opposed to the car. They didn't like it. I said, no, they didn't. I said, there were some people who didn't like it.

Obviously, that's always going to be the case but i said um you know the the car took off without the government forcing anybody to do it people were buying those early model cars and driving them over unpaved roads and through small streams and stuff it's one of the reasons why they had such big wheels and elevated carriage and everything they They were traveling slowly and they were taking roads that had been used by horse trails. And they didn't put in traffic lights and paved roads and then punish people if they kept a horse. They didn't do any of that stuff. It grew naturally and the government was slow to react. It wasn't taking the lead.

It wasn't coercing anybody. That's not the case that we're seeing now. People loved the Model T because it liberated them. Prior to that, you pretty much had to stay where you were because of the limitations of time and distance. You had to live in the city, let's say, if that's where you worked. It was very difficult to live out in the country. You didn't have mobility. The Model T gave the average American mobility, which gave him unprecedented freedom. And that is what's on the table right now. And that is why it has our entire life.

We've watched these people, these urban planners, they hate the automobile. They think it is the worst thing ever. They think the best invention of mankind is the city. But, you know, as Jefferson said, cities are a threat to the health, the wealth, and the liberty of man. And that is always has been the case. But they look at it and they say, well, we've got to stop this sprawl. We've got to stop the suburbs. We've got to ban the car.

I've been hearing that my entire life, and I'm sick of it. But they're getting there. They're doing it now by political mandates, and people are sitting on the sidelines and wringing their hands and saying, well, what can we do? I don't have any permission in the constitution to do that. It's like, they don't have any permission to do this in the constitution. You've let them turn this whole system upside down. Everything is prohibited to them unless expressly given to them. They don't have any authority to ban our cars. They don't have any authority to ban fuel. They don't have any authority to ban food and the don't have any authority to ban food and the rest of this stuff.

That's right. And it's no wonder these urban planners hate the car because it gives the average person the means to get around their plans. Yes, yes, to escape their plans. The worst laid plans. People get out of the city for a reason. Nobody was forced to leave the city.

People are forced to stay in the city. That's right. Yeah. Well, I got off on that tangent because I want to talk about the, you know, the juxtaposition of Ford abandoning automobiles that are affordable in mass market and the, you know, the trend to these incredibly ridiculously expensive elitist automobiles. But let's talk about the Toyota RAV4 because it's one of the things I like about your website. You talk about practical cars, and you do honest reviews of real practical cars. What do you think of the Toyota RAV4? Well, it's interesting because it's just another crossover. I have this lament all the time. Oh my gosh, they sent me another crossover. They all look the same. We all complain about that, those of us who really love cars. But they're not necessarily all the

same. You just have to go beyond how they look. So in the case of this RAV4, one of the things that I really like about it is that it does not have one of these inappropriately small engines that has to have a turbo to make up for the fact that it's so small. It has a naturally aspirated 2.5 liter engine that makes adequate power and makes it very reliably and probably will make it for 200,000 plus miles. It does not have one of these CVT transmissions, which a lot of people who are listening will be familiar with, that are very common now for the same reason that the really small engines are very common.

It's all because of compliance and appeasing the federal apparatus. So it's got a very simple and reliable drivetrain, which is a value proposition for people who don't want to have to replace their car or an expensive component of it during the first 10 years of ownership. The other thing about it that's kind of neat, I think, is that it has some additional capability that you generally won't find in that class. Toyota offers a TRD version of it that has a raised suspension, has additional tow rating, 3,500 pounds, which is good for a little crossover. So, you know, the thing is very practical, as well as being kind of fun at the same time,

and it's a great value proposition. So, you know, I'm not surprised that it sells well, and it's certainly a whole lot better as an alternative to a $50,000 Tesla. Well, that's cool. Yeah, it is interesting, too, to see some of the first electric pickup trucks come out. And I think we talked about this before, you know, the guy hooked up the electric truck and the range just went straight down because they don't have any – I think it really is because they don't have any different gearing with that. Well, it's load, you know, the bottom line is, you know, in order to do work, you have to expend a certain amount of energy, whether it's you and me going for a run or a vehicle doing something like pulling a trailer. And the word is getting out, you know, because

I know a couple of guys who've done YouTube videos about the, you know, the, for example, the, the lightning Ford's electric version of the f-150 truck and one of them that was just spectacularly revelatory was when the guy hooked up a relatively small trailer six thousand pounds which for a half-ton truck is nothing uh and it killed the range of the thing it plummeted to less than a hundred miles if you can imagine that. It's ludicrous. You can imagine what would happen to this thing if you put a 10,000-pound trailer on the back of it and tried to drive it somewhere. Oh, exactly. Yeah, that's why, you know, we look at the, oh, we're going to have electric semi-trailers.

I think not for a long time. It's just the energy issue with it. But the thing that I'm really concerned about is the self-driving aspect of all this. Do you think that we've hit peak hype on all this self-driving stuff? A couple of weeks ago, you had Amazon as well as, who was it? I think it was maybe UPS or somebody. They pulled back. Maybe it's Federal Express.

Pulled back and said, whoa, we're going to suspend our programs. They all did it. There were like three of them that did it in one week. Pull back on their last mile delivery by autonomous moving things. Yeah, well, that's because the narrative is coming unglued. The wheels are falling off, as it has been with so many of these other things. The beautiful thing about reality and truth is that they do win out in the end. So we've been hearing the hype and the assertions about all of these things,

whether it's masks, vaccines, climate change, autonomous driving, electric cars, for years. And it's been mostly speculative and hypothetical. So people hear these speculations and hypotheticals. Oh, it sounds good to me. Okay, fine. I'm okay with that. But now the reality of it is staring them in the face, literally. It's a tangible fact, and it's very, very hard to not deal with it. And I think that's what's happening. People are becoming aware that they've been sold a bill of goods about everything.

Yeah, yeah, I agree. I agree. Let's talk about something for fun here. I don't know if you saw this or not. And, of course, you're on the phone, so you can't see this clip. But are you familiar with iRacing, where they get some NASCAR drivers drivers in and they compete against each other in a video game type of format? Are you familiar with that? Yeah, sure. Okay.

So one of these guys, I don't know if you saw this or not. The guy, let me get the guy's name here. Ross Chastain. Did you see what he did with the wall ride? I did not. Okay. So this is kind of interesting because it kind of goes back to, it's a real inventive idea.

I'm reminded of, uh, uh, was it junior Johnson or what, you know, the, the old, uh, NASCAR guys who, who used to be a moonshine runner and stuff. And he, he kind of, uh, pioneered the idea of drafting, right. You know, uh, getting up behind somebody and, and using, uh, staying in, uh, kind of their, their shadow as far as yeah. Slipstream. Exactly. And not having, and then at the last minute pulling out from underneath them.

Well, what this guy did and he, and he learned it from iRacing and he actually got banned from iRacing for doing it. It's a thing called the wall ride. And I would not have thought that it would work, but he just went full on. up against the wall let me show it's a little 10 second clip here i'll show people what it looked like here we have a there's a race and he's right up there scraping alongside the wall and look at how fast he is pulling past everybody and he just left everybody in the dust he was going like i'll play it real quickly again he's going like twice as fast as everybody else it looks like they're standing still and so i wonder out in the real world whether there's some aerodynamic advantage doing something like that i don't know exactly how the

thing worked but i thought it was really interesting it was something that he had done on a video game and it worked on a video game and he got banned on the iRacing thing and he got banned for doing it on the video game and then he thought well let me try this in real life and he did and he kept him from uh you know he was way back and he got pulled up so he was not eliminated i think it was a qualifying round or something like that he said i played a lot of n NASCAR 2005 on the GameCube when I was growing up, but he said it was when he did it in iRacing, one guy uploaded a clip of himself trying to pull off a wall ride in NASCAR only for his car to clip into a random bit of geometry and got sent spinning.

But this guy was able to pull it off. I thought that was really amusing. Yeah, that's amusing. and it sure beats two guys and a sheep. Do you know what I'm talking about there? No, I don't know what that reference is. What is that? Okay, well, you probably missed it.

I wrote an article a little while ago about a Volkswagen commercial that's hardly about the car at all. It shows two gay guys, and they pick up a sheep, and then it shows them living with the sheep and walking together on the beach with the sheep. Yeah. I'll send it to you. Yeah.

It's, it's the most incredible thing ever because they're apparently more interested in selling virtue than they are in selling Volkswagens. So we're going to have to add another letter to the LGBTQ, uh, uh, B for bestiality or something. Yeah.

And then there's the other video. This is the piece de resistance, and if you haven't seen it, everybody listening should go see this. Ted Nugent, love this guy. I think he was being interviewed by PBS or something like that, and he was asked about his vaccine hesitancy and what he wants to tell people, and he said, and his language was perfect, he said something like, I speak their language, I speak to them thusly. And then he went, meh, meh.

I did see that. I did see that. That's gone viral. Yeah, that's perfect. Perfect response. The guy doesn't know what to say about that. Yeah, that is what is happening. Sometimes you just have to say that.

We look at this, and that's the thing that bothers me with all this, as you and I have talked about it for the longest time. How many people are still afraid, and the way the media is still hyping stuff, saying, oh, look, in LA, we got a 25% increase in the number of people who have tested positive of COVID. Can you believe that they're still trying to pull this stuff off, and that it's being featured on the Drudge Report to try to panic people. They're doing the same thing with monkeypox. Oh, monkeypox is being transmitted even before people have any symptoms, all of the same stuff. And the problem is that's

the reason why I spotted this stuff so early on. They've been doing this with flu for years and years, for decades. And so it was all the same, the usual suspects. It was the same MO and they'd run this, but they're still doing it now. And it's amazing to me how many people are still being fooled and panicked by this. They've got a long list of variants. You know, we've got the B1 2.37 variant and all the rest of this stuff. And when you look at what is happening in China, they want to do that here. It's amazing. Sure they do, of course, because that's the point.

You know, it redounds to their power to keep everybody absolutely mortified and terrified, and as H.L. Mencken put it, you know, clamoring for safety, which, of course, they're obligingly prepared to give to them. It's a tragedy. It's a viciousness that I never thought that I would see happen in this country in my lifetime. And by the way, did you catch that piece in the Atlantic, which is one of the great organs of the left? Oh, yeah. Amnesty? Oh, just forgive and forget.

Let's play patty cake and sing kumbaya. It was just a misunderstanding. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Oh, I've been talking about that. Everybody's been talking about that on our side. Really, yeah, they gave themselves amnesty, but I said, well, we got to make sure is that we don't get amnesia. We got to remember what this was about. That's exactly right. I mean, I'm prepared to forgive. I will never forget.

And I think that as a culture, as a people, we can never forget what was done and keep that in mind for as long as we live and pass that down to our kids so that they can pass it down to their grandkids so that this sort of thing never happens again. Well, I agree. You know, at the very beginning of this, when you had all these pastors who were either ignorant, gaslighted, or bought off saying, well, you got to get the vaccine as a way you love your neighbor and all the rest of this nonsense. I said, no, the way I love my neighbor is to tell them not to take an experimental DNA genetic code injection. That's the way I love my neighbor. to tell them not to take an experimental DNA genetic code injection. That's the way I love my neighbor.

And so when a lot of people say, well, it's not Christian to not forgive these people. And it's like, well, you know, we understand as Christians that there are consequences for what you do. And, you know, God can forgive them, but the government does not bear the sword in vain. The government has to be about justice. And if the government won't mete out justice, and if the government won't protect our God-given liberties, which is what their number one and really only job is, if they won't do that, then it's time for us to alter or abolish that government.

And that's really what we need to be looking at. No question. Atonement must precede forgiveness. Without atonement, there cannot be forgiveness. That's right. Yeah, I've got a bunch of clips about the amnesty or amnesia. Let me just play one of them. I know you can't see this.

I'll narrate this. This is some clips that people are putting up saying, you know, remember when they did this here you got a bunch of people they've already spaced out and you've got the armored up police with their sticks making sure everybody is six feet apart they've got the things marked off there and pushing people apart with this stuff i mean we saw this and this one right here here you got people being dragged by the hair in germany with a mob of cops look at that kicking that they got this guy by the hair in Germany with a mob of cops. Look at that, kicking that. They got this guy by the hair.

One of them was holding it. The other guy comes up and kicks him in the face with his knee. And they're saying, oh, really? Is this what we're supposed to forget now? I mean, we can't forget this police brutality that's been happening. No, and how many people were not able to say goodbye to their elderly relatives who died in prisons for old people during all of this it's it words fail me or even have a funeral and one of the clips that

i played last week when we're talking about this amnesty nonsense it was a clip in the uk and they had everybody they eased up enough to let people go to a funeral for the father of the family and the mother is sitting there grieving and her son moved his seat from being six feet away from her moved his seat over there and the little thug running the funeral home comes up and breaks him and makes him move it back away and it's like you know seriously are we ever going to do this again and how could people have put up with this in the first place was beyond me yeah i saw that and you, just from my chair, I thought to myself, I would have lost control of it. I would have decked that guy. Yes, exactly. And it's amazing to me how long, how quickly they were able to put this in

place and how long they were able to keep this thing going and how some people are still gaslighted and in fear about all of this stuff. And that's the thing that I'm concerned about. And again, when we look at the election, how few people have even mentioned any of this stuff. And if they did, it was only really in a tangential way. You look at the situation with Gretchen Whitmer, one of the worst witches of this whole thing. And in the back and forth of the very articulate candidate, Tudor Dixon, she hammered her on the shutdown of the schools and some things like that, but not really. You put some businesses out of business and things like that,

but it was really kind of a soft touch on all of that stuff. My take on it is keep the schools shut. I don't want to pay for these schools. Let's get rid of that whole educational model and replace it with something completely different. We've all seen that it doesn't work. That may just happen. You know, it's one of the unintended and positive side effects of all of this, that a lot of parents got to see what really goes on in the government schools when they saw what their kids were seeing on the computer. And, you know, now it has been elaborated even more

because they're trying to force them, parents, to have their kids vaccinated with these drugs that are not vaccines. And a lot of parents are saying, you know, I'm not doing that. It's my child. I'm not going to put my child's health at risk. I'll figure something else out. I'll homeschool or I'll do something else, anything but put my kid in one of those government schools. I agree. And one of the things I think is the funniest thing about this, Eric,

we homeschooled all of our kids, and people were saying, but what about socialization? Are you kidding me? Look at what the school just did for the last two years. You want to talk about socialization? And I would say at that point in time, you know, when we were talking back then, I said, do you really think it's socialization to have the kids, you know, marching in line from one room to the other every hour

and to sit there quietly and listen to somebody, you know, try to fill their minds with whatever they want to do. I said, that's not education. Education is not the filling of a bucket. Education is not downloading information into your mind. Education is about lighting a fire. So people giving them the tools of learning and lighting a fire. That's what education is about. It's not about any of that stuff. That's not socialization. That is really abnormal. But it got on steroids in terms of abnormality the last couple of years. And people have seen that.

And they've seen what was being taught to their kids in the school through these Zoom classes. And so now, yeah, homeschooling has exploded. But we've got to watch out that we don't get trapped by taking the government coin and letting them then control it in a different way. No question. And, you know, just to get to that, to speak to that point that you raised about socialization, it's a fatuity. You know, homeschool people have friends, and they're able to go out and do activities.

They're just not under the thumb of a government school. That's right. That's right. Yeah, and one of the things that I've seen, you know, with homeschool kids, we've been around a lot of them. And, uh, it's a very different thing than when I was in school, you know, you, you had this with this rigid age segregation that they called socialization. Yeah. You were contemptuous of kids that were a year younger. You were in awe of kids that were a year older and adults. Oh, you don't even talk to them type of thing that doesn't happen with a homeschool kids. You know, they, some of them are gregarious and some of them are kind of

withdrawn, but they're going to treat everybody the same way, regardless of whether, you know, regardless of their age or whether or not they're an adult, you know, and to me, that's real socialization. Everybody's going to have different personality types, but that's real socialization. No question. And also, you know, in my own experience, I know a number of homeschooled kids too. They are mature beyond their years. You can have adult conversations with 13-year-olds as opposed to talking to 25-year-olds who are products of government schools that are essentially illiterate and just speak and like and see and all of that stuff. And that's because the homeschool movement generally focuses on teaching critical thinking, not on rote memorization and obedience to authority. That's right. That's right. Yeah, it's a very different approach. I just hope, again, I think it's always been a trap to try to get people to, you know, the way the government

controls us is with the money. And if they can, they're trying to carve out little areas and say, yeah, okay, well, we'll let you have some charter schools, but we're going to control the flow of the money. We'll let you have homeschooling, but, you know, we'll have some of these programs, and we can kind of draw you back in in that way, and that truly is a trap. We have to be careful about those strings because they come with the strings attached, and they're going to start pulling those strings, no doubt about it. Absolutely. You know, it's important to bear in mind that these people have an interest,

and it's not our interests. That's right. That's right. Yeah. It always has been about, you know, manipulating the next generation. It's always been about social engineering, everything that they do. But it's particularly a problem when they're able to, when they have a free hand with children. Let's talk about something else in transportation. Flying cars. It used to be a running joke. People would say, wait a minute, where's my flying car? We were all told that the Jetsons, by now I should have my flying car. Well, they're coming out with several of these things now, a lot of different designs, some of them kind of interesting when you look at them, but of course all of them are super, super expensive, just like the hyper sports cars, uh, they will be owned by the rarefied few and, uh, you know,

our, our betters, our masters will be able to go wherever they wish. They will have the, uh, uh, the, uh, uh, flying cars. It's not going to be the Jetsons. One of the ones that I saw, uh, I don't know if you've seen this one or not, but it was really bizarre. It had a body that air passed through, and you sat in the cockpit, which was really like a bubble, and the thing would lift up like a hovercraft, and then the body would rotate 90 degrees degrees and it would become a wing. And as it was rotating, you would stay upright and the car would rotate around you and then fly off.

Now, that's got some really novel designs. But again, if you look at the future, they're not planning on any of us having any mobility at all, are they? No, well, when cash is no object, you can do things like that. And I'm all for it. You know, I think like, you know, lightweights and home builds and stuff like that, all the way up to if you have the money and the means and you want to buy yourself a 707 like John Travolta did, hey, that's great, more power to you. But as you say, you know, for most people, that's a non-starter.

With regard to flying, you know, it's inherently more expensive because, you say, for most people, that's a non-starter. With regard to flying, it's inherently more expensive because you can't afford to have a breakdown. You can't just pull off to the side of the road. And that's why aviation is so expensive. There are really rigid, and for good reason, maintenance requirements for anything that flies, especially in commercial airspace. And that alone is often more expensive to keep up with than the airplane itself. And that would be the same thing with a flying car. Yes, I agree. Yeah, it's going to be, and it'll be something that'll be,

they'll make the argument, well, not everybody can do this, so we're going to have to just restrict this to the few people, and it's going to be the type of thing where, you know, just as Elon Musk just bought an $80 million new Gulfstream, his fourth plane, that'll be the kind of way that this is going to roll out. When in reality, one of the things that Elon Musk did understand when he started talking about boring, he understood that if we're going to have cities that are going to continue to grow and grow and grow and grow vertically, then our transportation network is going to have to grow and grow and grow and grow vertically, then our transportation, uh, uh, network is going to have to grow,

uh, grow vertically as well. So that's what he was doing with boring. Uh, these people are going to do it with the flying cars. And then they're going to also allow, I think, uh, Amazon, and maybe another one or two companies to have a monopoly on drone delivery while we get grounded at home. I think that is clearly what they intend to do. That's what the videos they've been producing and talking about doing. Yeah, and all of the people, I think without exception, that are the pushers behind this always present themselves

as the hail fellow, well met, the man of the people, the advocate for equality. Again, it's an example of the effrontery and the dissonance of these people. And you can basically, whatever they say, turn it around because it's exactly the opposite of that. And now they're all at COP 27 in an authoritarian country, Egypt, talking about how they were going to tighten the screws down on all of us. They all flew in there with their private jets. You got people like King Charles. There a an amazing report that came out from somebody that worked for him has written a book i don't know if you've seen it eric uh charles had a teddy bear with him until the age of 40 and he had his nanny his nanny was the only one who was allowed to repair it to do major surgery to it the nanny that he'd had as a young child he kept

into his old and maybe that's why he stopped because you know maybe The nanny that he'd had as a young child, he kept into his old, and maybe that's why he stopped because, you know, maybe the nanny died and he couldn't get any, get her to repair it or anything. But he had that. I almost feel bad for that guy if he weren't such a malevolent figure. You know, on a human level, you can feel sad for a person like that. But then you, you know, step back from that and realize the contempt that that person has for us and that they're actively seeking to do horrible things to us. Yeah. Just like,

just like his dad, his dad saw a humanity as a virus that needed to be eradicated. You know, he wanted to come back as a virus so he could kill people. That's what he said. You know, that's the way these guys are. It is amazing.

The contempt that they have for humanity and how neurotic they are from this sheltered world. Well, I think that's where it derives from. You know, I'm no psychoanalyst, but I think probably a lot of these people inwardly realize how despicable they are, and they project that onto the population at large, which they assume to be just like themselves. I agree. I agree. Well, it's great talking to you, Eric. As always, folks, if you want to know about liberty and mobility, if you're in the market for a practical car, you can't find any better review site than EP Autos. But of course, Eric has his finger on the pulse of what is happening with liberty and mobility. Nobody better in terms of those issues. Thank you for joining us, Eric.

epautos.com. Thank you. Thanks for having me, David. Thank you. All right, folks, we've got just a couple of minutes left. And before the show ends, I just wanted to mention something quickly about this whole Pelosi thing. You know, we have a, they've now come out saying they're not even going to release the mugshot of Pelosi's attacker. Seriously. You've had NBC come out and have a different narrative that the people had had. But, you know, just before we leave the mugshot issue, here's a man charged with threatening to kill a Republican gubernatorial candidate in Illinois, in Chicago, and at the very top of the article, and you'll see this everywhere you go, is his mugshot.

That's a mugshot of the guy, the very first thing they show. But you're not going to be allowed to see the mugshot of the Pelosi attacker. What is this about this? This guy, Scott Lennox, 21. We know his name, his age. We got his picture, the rest of this stuff. But we can't get an accurate picture of even what was going on in the Pelosi household. NBC reported that Paul Pelosi went to

the door. He was supposedly the person who let them in, then walked back to this attacker, and then the struggle began. When he went to the door, he said, everything is good. That was reported by NBC. And then shortly after that, they dutifully pulled that report. Now, this could all be solved if they wanted to show us the body cam pictures if they wanted to show us the video cameras that were everywhere if they wanted to explain to us why if this guy broke in there was no alarm that went off they could show us the pictures of all the other neighbors and all the rest of this stuff nobody is buying it the neighbors aren't buying it i'm not buying it but they continue to try to use this as an excuse. I think what is going to happen, frankly, is that Nancy Pelosi does not

want to be there at her age, uh, as minority leader. So it looks pretty certain that she's going to lose that position and she will retire. She'll say she'll play the victim and say that it was because of this attack on her husband. I think that's what they're gaming up for here. I also want to say thank you to some of the people who left tips. Andromeda, thank you very much for the tip. Mary Russell, thank you as well. So it's God bless you and Eric Peters.

And I'll relay that information to him as well. Thank you so much for all of that. Yeah, it's going to be interesting to see what happens, how they're going to drag this out, how they're going to use this situation, again, to create chaos. Anybody could easily fix this situation. It's this mail-in election that has complicated things. It's the voting machine companies that we are not allowed to criticize that have the responsibility to prove to us that their machine works and works honestly and that it is secure. That's their responsibility. It's not our responsibility. So before we leave, I just want to show you the wall again. And maybe it's time for us to hit the wall and surprise them with some

special tricks. There you go, right there. That's exactly what we need. So as we come back, it worked. We were able to go to the clip and come back. We always are finding new features that happen with this system, intended and otherwise. That's it for the show. Thank you for joining. new features that happen with this system, intended and otherwise. That's it for the show. Thank you for joining us. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.