The David Knight Show - 9Dec22 Twitter Makes You Invisible But TSA Wants Your Face

Episode Date: December 9, 2022

OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESThe Twitter Files Part Deux — Visibility Filters and other censorshipscams 2:05Control of visibility, amplification, trending, hash tags — with direction from CDC and other government agencies8:18The TSA is planning a nationwide rollout of biometric face scanning. They're lying about keeping the scans but you don't have to be intimidated or comply18:49Mainstream media joins with govt to imagine a vast conspiracy of attacks on infrastructure to stop —— Drag Shows40:13Pentagon’s New and Costly Green Mandate for Weapons. Carefully track your CO2 emissions while you manufacture nuclear bombs?54:58What can you do if you’ve taken the vaccine or are at risk?1:00:49Biden's new 1099 rules will keep even his army of 87,000 new IRS agents busy. But why do the Democrats care about an income tax? It's NOT about deficits1:03:31What was the economic miracle of the Ukraine that increased their GDP by 33% in 2021?1:11:24Alex Jones back on the Trump bandwagon and making excuses for Operation Warp Speed1:12:19Proud Boys sedition trial hinges on whether government prosecutors can hide the testimony of a police officer1:20:41How badly has Herschel Walker failure hurt Trump?1:31:26 False prophetess Julie Green misses it AGAIN — big time1:32:14How did the massive freighter, "Ever Forward", get stuck in Chesapeake Bay for over a month?1:35:17Voldemort Zelensky — Time magazine’s Person of the Year.1:39:33WATCH: the kidnapping of the baby whose parents wanted to use unvaxed blood from volunteers1:41:12"Experts" missed it by a mile on hurricane predictions, are clueless about "rising" sea levels. But another British town has a plan for draconian "Climate Lockdown" of travel1:49:00Georg Della Pietra, founder of SafeBlood.net joins2:03:37What’s happened in New Zealand, removing the ability to use donor blood, is happening everywhere as part of the pandemic RESET of medical care2:04:07What the Red Cross screens in blood — and what they DON'T screen2:20:47The risk of fatality is even worse with blood transfusions BEFORE the vaccines — BUT THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES to transfusions they don't tell you2:25:23Gorsuch asks about "re-education camps" in SCOTUS questioning for yet another persecution of a Christian business by Colorado "Civil Rights" commission. Katanji Brown Jackson's line of questioning is a clueless non sequitur 2:37:52What are Musk's plans with Twitter? 2:55:55Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @[e-mail] App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business.

Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate. The IT solutions people. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 9th of December, Year of Our Lord 2022, Day 1002 of the Executive Order declaring a state of emergency, giving legal cover, giving money, and it just keeps building. So today we're going to talk about the latest revelations on Twitter. Information about the shadow banning, it's absolutely amazing.

And of course, the emails that have been exposed showing that the government had a back door and was directing all of this in violation of the First Amendment. TSA face scans, IRS data scans, and the terror alert about power stations is really starting to take on the contours of a false flag narrative we'll talk about that along with pentagon climate mandates we got a lot to cover today even julie green the false trump prophet is back with information about herschel walker we'll be right back stay with us well the twitter files part two this is something that was promised after the first batch of information was given by Elon Musk to Matt Taibbi. And he gave another batch of information to another reporter, Barry Weiss,

who's been working on this. But there was some distractions and some other things that happened in the meanwhile. It's been about a week, I guess, since the others were released. We've seen FBI agent James Baker, who is now working for Twitter. No longer, though. He was fired because he was part of this conspiracy to cover up information that would have impacted the election. But when we look at this now, they're breaking this out in very specific details. It reminds me of this meme here from Minds.com. They actually tweeted this out.

The world has been tricked into thinking that misinformation is more dangerous than censorship. This is very convenient for dictators. And that's exactly what we're talking about here. For example, as this information is put out by Barry Weiss, he says Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya argued that COVID lockdowns would harm children. So Twitter put him on a secret blacklist, a trends blacklist, which prevented his tweets from trending. Pull this up.

I want people to see what this looks like. Scroll down a little bit and look at the different things there. See recent abuse, strike trends, blacklist, the strike count. This is what they see. This is their, you know, the view to the people who are running Twitter. And they put, it's amazing to me. I've had this happen to me. I know exactly what they're doing for the longest time.

And it really has escalated over the last thousand days to the point where there really isn't any point of me being at Twitter. None whatsoever. Uh, I used to like Twitter. I got on back in 2012 and, uh, and it worked, you know, um, when I would do an interesting tweet, I would get a lot of, uh, comments. I get a lot of followers, not anymore, nothing. And it's just been taken to zero.

It's a sham. It's gaslight. And it makes me so angry to see this stuff here, knowing that this is pervasive, that it is calculated, that it is engineered, it is weaponized censorship. They're doing it hand in glove with the government and pretending that it's just their prejudice and their bias taking over what has become a digital public square uh that would be bad enough but when you look at how weaponized and and again calculated this is so for jay badacharya if i'm pronouncing hisattacharya, if I'm pronouncing his Bhattacharya,

recent abuse strikes trends a blacklist. So that means that nothing that he tweets can ever trend. Then going to another famous account, Dan Bongino. They put him on a search blacklist. So they can put you on so that your tweet can't ever trend. No tweet will ever trend. Another one so that if anybody searches for you, they won't find you. Another one, uh, Charlie Kirk, do not amplify, do not amplify. Yeah, this is, uh, they call shadow, what we call shadow banning. They called visibility filtering, or just VF as an abbreviation there,

visibility filtering. And so Barry Weiss says, think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see at different levels. It's a very powerful tool. And that's a quote from a senior Twitter employee. It was a whistleblower to them. Visual filtering refers to Twitter's control over user visibility. It used VF to block searches of

individual users, to limit the scope of a particular tweet's discoverability, to block select users' posts from ever appearing on the trending page, and from inclusion in hashtag searches even. I would look at this stuff and say, let me put a hashtag, that doesn't matter. I have so many people over the last several years who've said, I thought you were gone. I just looked for you, thought about and looked for you and I found you here, but I never see any of your stuff in my feed.

As a matter of fact, Karen unfollowed me. It goes beyond this. They would unfollow you from people. And I saw that happening as my counts would go down, not over the weekend, over the weekend at one point before I was completely shut down, I could see the tweet counts going up over the weekend and then going, uh, going up, um, yeah, going up over the weekend and then coming down, especially on Monday and Tuesday when they would come back to work. So I knew there was something manual happening, but to see this kind of stuff here, labeling and it happened to Karen.

They unfollowed her from me. And then they suggested that you follow occasional cortex AOC. Like what? Yeah, it is. It is such a sham. It's such a gaslight. I don't even want to. Yeah, we'll put up our videos there, but I don't bother to look for me there. It's just, I'm fed up with

all social media. I don't have the time to do it anyway. If people want to listen to what I have to say, they can come here. It's just that simple. I don't have time to, uh, to do the analysis, the reading and analysis and play games on social media. Anyway, it just makes me angry. I get really angry. Uh, now interacting with the Trump cult, I have no patience with those people. And so I shouldn't be doing that. Uh, anyway, um, so all this is done without the user's knowledge. We control visibility quite a bit. They said we control amplification of your content quite a bit. Normal people do not know how much we do. You know, at least when you're watching the outer limits, they tell you, you know, we have control

of your television set. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical for the next 30 minutes. We've got your TV set. Uh, they don't do that on Twitter. It is virtual reality. It is life in the metaverse. It is anything but real. It's gaslighting in the most cynical way. I had some troll because I posted something that Alex had said a couple of weeks ago. And some guy comes back and says, oh, well, Mr. Truth Teller, why aren't you purged? It's like, oh, really? You think I'm not purged?

How did you even find me? Oh, that's right, because it was Alex Jones. The group that decided whether to limit the reach of certain users was the Strategic Response Team Global Esation team srt get they handled about 200 cases a day there existed a level beyond official ticketing beyond the rank and file moderators following the company's policy on paper this secret group included the head of legal policy and trust of a J a Gada, the global head of trust and safety, Yol Roth and subsequent CEOs of Jack Dorsey and Prague Agrawal. It's interesting.

Jack Dorsey got a lot of pushback when he said, just release all of the, and he should, you know, must release all of it. At live score bet. We love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement,

the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.

Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for

businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire i.t and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters growing your business whether it's communications or security innovate has you covered visit innovate today innovate the i.t solutions people in the name of transparency and just getting it out there. And a lot of people took him on and said, well, why didn't you do that?

Did you not even know what was going on in your company or decided that you're going to cover up? This doesn't look too good, does it, Jack? So this is where the biggest and most politically sensitive decisions got made. If you got somebody that's a high profile account like libs of tick tock, they would get together. Well, all right. How, how can we shut her down and the way that's going to be least visible and the least controversy, but they would put her not only just on trends, blacklist, and all the rest of the stuff, but then they had another thing where they, another label that they would put on,

do not take action without consulting with the higher ups, essentially. For these accounts, there'll be no ticket, no nothing. And we'll do this personally. We'll take this personally. Alan Vale, thank you very much. That's very kind and generous. I appreciate that on Rockford. Merry Christmas, my family. Thank you for everything you do. Well, thank you, Alan. I appreciate that. She was subjected to six suspensions this year alone. Each time, the woman who was running libs of TikTok was blocked for posting as long as a week.

Uh, they impeded repeatedly told her that she had been suspended for violating policy against hateful contact. And if you've seen the libs of TikTok and everybody asks what she does is I don't know how in the world, uh, she monetizes this or has any way to make a living when she spends all our time it would drive me nuts to spend that kind of time looking at the stuff that she grabs and then reposts on twitter and all she's doing is reposting what people are proud to put up she's not doxing them it's not hate they're proud of it they're proud of of what they're saying. But the committee acknowledged that she had not directly engaged in any behavior that violated their hateful conduct policy. Of course she didn't.

But they justified her suspensions internally by claiming that her posts encouraged online harassment. And they say, compare this to what happened when she was docked. Docks, I should say, where you had that Washington Post reporter who was whining about somebody saying something about her and then did that to libs of TikTok. Photo of her home with her address is posted to presumably get her in danger. That's the key thing. I mean, it's, you know, putting that stuff out there. People show up at your home and people who like you, but sometimes people who don't like you. We reviewed the reported content.

We didn't find it to be in violation of the Twitter rules, they said. But that tweet is still up, the one that Doxter, the one that Doxter, except that is supposed to be grounds for taking stuff down. Remember when Zero Hedge, at the very beginning of this, and everybody was saying, is this some kind of a major bioweapon that was released out of Wuhan by accident or deliberately? And there was a guy there that was doing research on bats and coronaviruses and stuff like that.

And it was on his LinkedIn profile that he had out there publicly. And all Zero Hedge did was do an article and put it up on Twitter. And they suspended them for that. Suspended them for putting up stuff that people put up themselves. In internal Slack messages, Twitter employees spoke of using technicalities to restrict visibility of tweets and of people. Yol Roth requested more research to support expanding the non-removal policy interventions like disabling engagements, de-amplification, and visibility filtering. My hypothesis underlying much of what we've implemented is that if exposure to misinformation directly causes harm, how do you know?

We should use remediations that reduce exposure. And limiting the spread and the virality of content is a good way to do that. Again, where did we start with this? We said, yeah, the world's been tricked into thinking that misinformation is more dangerous than censorship. Very convenient for dictators. Dictators like this guy.

And of course, where this ultimately leads is something like this. You've got a guy in Shanghai. Look at this. Everybody on the sidewalk, the few people that are there have got masks. And he's wearing a mask, holding up a sign that says, you know what I want to say. He was taken away by police. You know what I want to say. So it doesn't do any good to try to beat around the bush.

Yeah, I could have stayed on YouTube maybe a little bit longer if I didn't refer to the vaccine. I know that they are, um, you know, doing, uh, uh, scanning the words that I say and are able to do that text, voice recognition. So you can, you can play some games like that, but ultimately it doesn't work. It only delays it. Uh, and I don't want to, um, give them the sense of any power by thinking that they found something. I'm just, you know, I'm just like, I'm done with YouTube. I'm done with Twitter.

Uh, we'll still post links up there if you want to look at it. But, uh, I don't think, you know, first of all, um, if,

uh, Musk pull some of this stuff out for some of these people, I don't have anything good to say about Elon Musk. You know that this is a guy who's got a Twitter profile with Baphomet on his chest. This is a guy who wants the end of humanity. He wants a singularity. He's pushing for transhumanism. His family has always been technocracy royalty.

He has become the richest man on earth by crony capitalism. I have no use for Elon Musk, and I'm not going to try to hide that when I post it on Twitter. Wonder what will happen to me with Twitter under Elon Musk. And I'm not going to kiss this hide that when i post it on twitter wonder what will happen to me with twitter under elon musk and i'm not going to kiss this guy's butt i'm not going to grovel before him never did i didn't when alex jones was trying to kiss up to him every time elon oh look at what elon musk did like give me a break give me a break boy we were that was but it wasn't uh an important thing it wasn't there all the time it wasn't until 2020 that we were. But it wasn't an important thing. It wasn't there all the time. It wasn't until 2020 that we were at loggerheads with each other. Anyway, CDC and the Census Bureau had direct access to a Twitter portal as well

where they could censor at will. Facebook had it for these government officials, and Twitter had it. And so there was a whole bunch of emails between employees that were obtained by the nonprofit organization, America First Legal. And so I guess they did a FOIA request and they found these emails from that side of, from the government side of it, showing that they were asking them, they went to the support portal and said, I'm having trouble logging in. Can you help me to do this and tell me some of the, how this works and that type of deal.

And so, um, this goes back to, uh, 2021 when the CDC was jumping in there. And let me tell you, that's, that's when things are really bad was, um, in 2020, actually before that. Uh, so they'd been doing it. This is just one employee at the CDC saying, I'm having trouble with this portal that you guys have set up for us. I need some help with it. Multiple emails from CDC employees trying to get enrolled in that.

And again, Facebook has got the same thing, content takedown portal. I was never interested in Facebook anyway. I mean, I never posted anything there with a show. There were people that were running Alex's social media that would sometimes post my stuff up on a Facebook channel for the show that I had there. But when they took it down in August 6, 2018, when they took everything down, everything went down for me, except for Twitter. For some reason, Twitter was there, but then they heavily shadow banned my content from that point on. And then it got a lot worse in 2020. So, but everybody else took me down.

I really wasn't interested in, you know, going back and getting on Facebook. YouTube, I did go back on several times and they continue to take me down, even taking down my music. Uh, yeah, without any explanation, no strikes, nothing.

Uh, additionally, a February the 4th email in 2021 shows Facebook's us head of public policy asking whether the individual is aware of department of Homeland Security's misinformation work. This, by the way, is important because it was a year before the DHS announced that they were going to set up their Disinformation Governance Board. Remember that? Just bring it out in the open with everybody.

So, in recent months, millions of Americans have witnessed the peeling of the misinformation onion, says the America First legal vice president and general counsel who got these emails. government and big tech is yet another layer of connections conspiracy and collaboration between power centers that seek to suppress information from the american people we'll take a quick at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how

we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly.

18 plus gamblingcare.ie Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate, the IT solutions people. We'll be right back. Stay with us. This is The David Knight Show.

Let's talk a little bit about traveling. You know, the holidays, we're in between Thanksgiving and Christmas and New Year's. There's a lot of traveling that's going on. And there's a new game in town at the TSA. They've been rolling out biometric machines for a while, doing face scans. They're intimidating people to give up your facial information into their database. Yes, they've already got it, especially if you've got a passport. They often get it off of the driver's licenses, but it's just a convenience thing for them.

They've got a lot of different databases, and they've got a new one that they're setting up, and they'd like for you to help them to populate it. That's what's really behind this. Even though they're telling people they're not going to save it. You really believe that? You know, going back, um, was it 2018 where this picture came up here, the terrorists, um, it's a British couple coming to the U S uh, and, uh, the grandfather's banned from a U.S. holiday after accidentally ticking the terrorist box on the visa form. And he says, I don't know why that question's on there in the first place. It was probably down there, do not write below this line.

But that was 2018. And so the TSA is planning a nationwide rollout of biometric machines for airport travelers. The machine currently being tested in more than a dozen airports with a possible nationwide rollout next year is one where travelers look straight into a camera. You put your driver's license or photo ID on a, you know, little card into the thing. And, um, then you stare into it and it's supposed to not store that information, but just, you know, look at the picture that's there and look at your face and

validate that that's the same thing. You know, like the way that the, um, the guys of the TSA, when you hand them, uh, your photo ID, you know, they look at that and look back and forth at you, that type of thing. Uh, so they call these cat machines. You get a cat scan. Are they trying to tell you something else? Is there something else that's happening with this?

Um, they're currently at 16 major airports with plans to expand nationwide kiosks with cameras are doing the job that used to be completed by humans checking to make sure people are not imposters. Right now, it's currently opt-in for passengers at the moment. But it's so controversial that several cities, San Francisco, the most notable, has banned it. It's so controversial that even the Washington Post is pushing back on this. Well, good, for once.

Glad that they are. There's a lot to worry about. If TSA is given the green light for a nationwide rollout next year, says Washington post, how can anyone trust this federal agency to handle biometric data properly? I wouldn't trust the TSA to do anything properly. They have failed nearly a hundred percent when they're tested all the time which tells you that there is no threat and they said that and we saw that and accidentally released documents that were up unredacted for half a day they said there is no threat against airports and airplanes in 2011 as they were threatening to make all of the state of Texas a no-fly zone with a legislative bill that had passed unanimously in the House of Texas

to stop the body scanning, to stop hands-on pat-downs and stuff like that. You don't let that happen, we're not going to let anybody fly in or out of Texas. Which, by the way, is the same thing that everybody, all the countries on a countrywide basis. You know, to Brazil, to Argentina, other places. If you don't get this Pfizer vaccine and you don't administer this, we're going to make you a no-go zone. People are not going to get out of your country and nobody's going to be allowed to go into your country. This is being done from a global standpoint, global governance, a global conspiracy. Anyway, back to this.

The expansion of biometric verification data for travelers is a sign that the U.S. is going down a terrifying path that China took to become a surveillance nation, says the Washington Post. But guess what? We are the ones who created the technology. We has met the enemy enemy and they is us. We created the technology. We gave it to them.

Some of it they stole. And then we use them as a beta test site for this tyranny. So here are your rights under this. The TSA says facial recognition helps to improve security. There is no threat. Besides, as they say, well, everybody wants better safety, don't we? Don't you want more safety? You feeling safe yet? All these safety measures to protect the continuity of government, they don't protect you at all. They're not even intended to protect you. They don't make you safer. As a matter of fact, all the scanning and bunching up the people in massive crowds doesn't make people safer. It makes them a more attractive target. Another indication of why there's no threats against airports.

Because we've seen this happen in areas where the Muslims are coming after the Christians and they're worried about bombs and people shooting the place up. So they hire security. They set up TSA checkpoints and types of stuff. So what do they do? Suicide bombers walk up and blow the suicide bomb up where everybody's bunched up to go in through security. It's stupid. It's stupid. It's stupid.

Anybody who does security knows that's a stupid way to do it. It doesn't work. There's no threat. Everybody wants better safety, do they? Nobody wants liberty and privacy anymore. That's the trade-off, you know, of course. They tell you that the measures that they're going to use to make you safe, you're going to have to give up some liberty. You're going to have to give up some privacy, but it's okay.

It's just a little slice until you got none of it left. Is this really safer? And what are the real costs? And do we care? So the founder of a group called Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, or STOP P stop, stop the surveillance. One of the biggest federal critics of facial recognition.

And, um, uh, they have some things to say about this and about your legal rights. And of course, you know, the, there's also issues,

not, uh, even about how this machine itself works because the first question is okay you're going to put your driver's license in there and then you're going to put your face in there um what about people who don't look like their driver's license photo you know kind of like everybody Do you look like your driver's license photo? I don't know. People who look like their driver's license photo. I mean, after I've sat in the DMV for three or four hours, by the time I get my picture taken, I've turned into Mr. Hyde.

You can see it in every one of my driver's license pictures. I look angry. I look drunk. I look at different things and uh i don't look like my dry i hope uh no karen says i don't look like it uh she keeps sunshiny she takes good driver's license pictures though um but i don't uh minor variations in appearance over time you know like three hours of waiting at the DMV, uh, changing your hairstyle or having your hair change on you, uh, have negligible negative impact on identity, identity verification says the TSA. Well, um, they haven't talked about, of course, and they won't, uh, whether this

thing actually works, does it give you false positives? Does it give you false positives? Does it give you false negatives? Just like they won't talk to you about how effective they are in terms of doing their scanning rituals. And here's the thing that may help to stall this thing or shut it down completely. Research has shown that facial recognition algorithms may be less accurate at identifying people of color. They're racist. Now I can get on with this and we can all get behind the fact that these scanners are racist and let's shut them down on the basis of racism.

Let's play the race card against TSA and the biometrics. I am. I'm serious. Um, so the guy who's running a stop says, I don't trust the TSA to evaluate the efficacy of their facial recognition systems or anything else for that matter. So if you do this, is going through airport security now mean that Homeland Security has a facial ID they can identify you at a protest? They have a lot of different ways that they can get that, as I said. They say they're not keeping it.

They say they're not using it to create a national database of facial IDs. But listen to this. Oh, we're not storing that. I mean, we just put it there and we check the two pictures and it's gone. No storing. We're not putting it in a database. We keep neither the live photo nor the photo of the id however with more questions the tsa did acknowledge that there are some times when it holds on to the data for 24 months at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance

to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses

on a selected race that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing Cheltenham with Live Score Bet this is total betting sign up by 2pm

14th of March bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18plusgamblingcare.ie looking for reliable This is Total Betting. Installing, managing, supporting, and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters. Growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today. Innovate. The IT solutions people. You know, just to evaluate the system's effectiveness.

You're keeping it for two years to evaluate the systems effectiveness. And you have added hardware and software to store this and maybe something to connect it to the cloud where they can store it in a database for two years. Is it being stored in that machine for two years? Are you transmitting it to the cloud? So you've got something in this machine. I'm sure they're not keeping it in that machine only. I'm sure it's connected to the web. And because otherwise, you know, how would they look at the effectiveness of this type of thing? So they have set up a mechanism to transmit this and to store it for two years, but then they'll get rid of it. They promise after they just told you they don't keep it. Then they tell you they keep it for two years. But then they'll get rid of it, they promise. After they just told you they don't keep it. Then they tell you they keep it for two years.

What's more, the TSA already has a plan to expand the scope of how it's using the tech. It's running a pilot of a second system at a few airports where you don't even have to present your physical ID for inspection. Your face is your ID. Well, that's an admission that they've got a database that they're keeping, right? It's amazing. Even if it was their intention, and this is just something that's happening with Mission Creep, but it's not. This is the mission of Creeps. It's this Cres' mission to identify everybody and create a database for it.

That's where they're going, and they're already there. They just don't want you to know it. First, they tell you, we don't save it. Then they tell you, we save it for two years. Then they say, well, you know, you don't even have to have that other piece because we got your face. I can't even lie about this. In tests with Delta, they compared passengers' live faces to a database of photos that the government already has, typically from passports. And they say, one guy says, yeah, but I like it because it saves me maybe five minutes on my trip.

That's what your liberty is worth to you, your privacy? Five minutes? minutes on my trip. That's what your Liberty's worth to you, your privacy five minutes. Well, you're talking about selling your, uh, heritage for a bowl of porridge. That's it. And now, because, uh, so that you could say five minutes, you have now become a thing and their internet of things. But of course I already had your picture anyway, from the passport. They said, just remember anytime data gets collected somewhere, it could also be stolen by other people. It could be used by criminals as well as the government. I'm not, I'm being redundant here, but, uh, it could be private criminals could grab it

because you only get one face. And if they've got your facial information, uh, that's if that's going to be, you know, the key to proving who you are, that's a major, uh,

identity theft right there. The TSA says all of its databases are encrypted to reduce hacking risk. But in 2019, Homeland security disclosed that photos of travelers were taken and data breaches accessed through the network of one of its subcontractors. We've seen every one of these so-called secure databases hacked. We've seen the military files hacked. The CIA has been hacked. That's how they got the Vault 7 stuff and everything.

Nobody is secure with any of this stuff. So what are your rights? Do you have to participate in this? Well, those who do not feel comfortable will still have to present their ID, as they always did in the past. But you can tell the officer that you do not want your photo taken. But notice that the default position is that they are going to take your photograph. And then the officer will turn off the live camera.

So the default is when you go through the airports, they're taking your picture and creating a database. There's also supposed to be signs around there informing you of your rights. Yeah, your rights as they have determined them. Does it mean that you'll be moved to a slower line, that you'll get an extra pat down, or you'll get a mark on your record? Well, you should have no derogatory experience, they say, based on exercising your right. However, we all know how that works. I mean, I, long before they made travel impossible for me, um, with all the masks and the mandates of vaccines and stuff like that, uh, I was at the point where if I could drive somewhere, I would do it. I would drive for days and drive through

the night to avoid flying. It was just such a hassle. I hated it. I never enjoyed flying, but after they, after 2001, it became a dystopian nightmare. Whenever I had to do it for business, it was, you know, I went in to go to war with these people. Just that simple. I'm not going to go through your machine. I'd do anything I could to become a wrench, a monkey wrench in their machinery. Anything I could do to make it difficult for them, even if it made it a lot more difficult for me. So I would always refuse to go through the machines. I would always make them get somebody to do a pat down,

so they'd make me stand over for a long time next to the x-ray machine. And so I refused to stand in the next to the x-ray machine and so i refused to stand in the next to the x-ray machine it just escalated from there got into fights with these people verbally um recorded them and uh the rest i mean i yeah i don't i shouldn't be in an airport because it's going to get me in jail one day if i go through that uh does it mean you'll get moved to a slow line yeah all this stuff these biometric programs are only optional in the introductory phases. The guy would stop, and we all know how that works. Over time, you see them becoming standardized, then nationalized, and eventually compulsory. There is no place that is more coercive to ask people for their consent

than an airport. And you understand the game that's being played there. I've talked about this many times. I talk frequently about BF Skinner and his operant conditioning. You can have positive operant conditioning or you can have negative operant conditioning. Negative means that you punish the doggy if he messes on the floor or something like that. Positive means that you click and treat and click and

treat and they respond to the click and then you start to create, you know, they start, whenever they do something that you want them to do, you click and they associate that with a treat even if you don't give them the treat. And so, positive operant conditioning is immediately rewarding the animal because they see you as an animal. That was one of the key premises of B.F. Skinner, that we don't have any freedom or dignity. There's nothing about mankind that is any different from any other animal. People can be trained just like you train a dog or a dolphin. And the way they do it at the airport is you let me touch you, you let me do anything that I want to do, and you'll be immediately rewarded to go on your way.

Otherwise, you get the negative. So even people who care a lot about privacy find their limits when it comes to airline travel. People gravitate to options that help them to get through the airport faster. And it's not hard to imagine ending up with a bifurcated airport experience, he said. So it's that, you know, it's the positive and the negative at the same time. And that's why they're rolling this stuff out. It's an acclimation process. They want to move the Overton window where people begin to accept it. So they put it in a place where people really don't want to opt out to get them acclimated to this stuff. So I refuse to do it.

People who don't consent to it pay a tax with their time and other things. At that point, really just how voluntary is it? How voluntary is it? I'm going to take a quick break here. And before I do, I had an email from someone, from Daniel, let's say, is his first name. And he says, listen to your show almost daily. He said, I've got three questions. First one, he said, he said something about a VAT tax.

Are you afflicted with RAS syndrome? That is the redundant acronym syndrome syndrome. Yeah, I've been warned about that by the department of redundancy department. If so, maybe you also say RAM memory and ATM machine. I hope they find a cure. Yes, I have been known to say all of those things to clarify it. I'll just put it that way. You know, Ram, we're not talking about the animal. We're talking about the memory and, uh, that, um, you know, we're talking about the tax. So I do say those types of things, but then he has some questions about music. Uh, he says, um, is that you on the keyboards? Uh, and he, he likes it. And yes, it is.

Um, the, the interludes that we do, I've recorded those. Uh, he said on one of these, it starts off with a various Christmas packages and some tinkly tune. Uh, but then there's a clip of a guy slapping his palm with a tire iron and not in a friendly way, uh, being who you are. I assume it was intentional, but I don't get it. What is happening? his palm with a tire iron and not in a friendly way. Being who you are, I assume it was intentional, but I don't get it. What is happening here? Well, I'm glad that you asked, Daniel, because I was really surprised at how little reaction I got from it.

My family asked me about that, but I hadn't really seen anything other than this, people talking about it. I put it in there and I thought people would notice it and comment on it it's from the tune is somewhere in my memory and it's from um uh sorry yeah home alone and um so it's somewhere in my memory and it's from home alone and so i've got a scene in there where you see a car uh that's driving on some snow and it's stopping and the next scene is a guy with a tire and so i thought well i'll just put that in there and see that's that at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to

10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie

Looking for reliable IT solutions for your business? At Innovate, we are the IT solutions people for businesses across Ireland. From network security to cloud productivity, we handle it all. Installing, managing, supporting and reporting on your entire IT and telecoms environment so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Whether it's communications or security, Innovate has you covered. Visit Innovate today.

Innovate, the IT solutions people. So here's the song in case you haven't noticed it. Thank you. Terima kasih telah menonton! and and we're back oh they came back quickly um for some reason uh anyway the um i've got a uh um what was i about to do here oh i wanted to show this to you i i talked about this yesterday maybe it was uh i don't know if it was last night during the premium show or if it was during the regular show but i talked about a listener from north carolina who said i i think they got a major false flag happening here. This has been several days that the power has been off and they're telling everybody that the substation was shot up by people who wanted to shut everything down because there's

going to be a drag show. They didn't want a drag show. So there's some protests, but the drag show was happening. They can't even say that there was anybody outside protesting the drag show there have been comments about it perhaps but it was taking place i haven't seen anybody show any pictures of anyone with any signs or any protests standing outside their pathetic little drag perversion thing and so yeah that looks like a bunch of nonsense. And I got interested in it because the person who put it out and it got traction and then the mainstream media started picking up, the person who put it out used to be with Army PsyOps. And she was also at January the 6th.

Now, maybe she's a real conservative. And if she is, she's an idiot. But maybe she's working for the other side. Or maybe she's both. I don't know. Maybe she's both an idiot and an agent provocateur. But once she put that out, everybody started. And NBC ran stories with it.

ABC is running stories with it I said well this might get picked up we'll see if this gets picked up by the FBI you know there's take a look at this as a matter of fact this is I call it the dim tech tips rising serpent put up there isn't it amazing how the media hasn't figured out the january 6 pipe bomber the supreme court leaker yeah that's real interesting uh a single one of epstein's clients the motive of the las vegas shooter but they knew that paul pelosi's midnight visitor was maga even before they could put their underwear back on. So, yeah, there's that, right?

They've got their suspects. And, of course, when you look at what is happening with various crimes, you know, we see the mainstream media coming after Kyle Rittenhouse and saying, oh, what an actor he is. But, you know, it's very complicated for this guy who got into a car and went down the middle of a Christmas parade, targeting children and other people because of racial motives. It's complicated. He needs some sympathy.

Same paper, USA Today, putting that out. So they've got this figured out, evidently, because now mainstream media is really jumping into this. You've got multiple state officials, especially Portland. Portland is jumping in and saying, yeah, we got that too. Get the FBI out there. We need to do an investigation.

Because, you know, the FBI is not interested in doing an investigation of the firebombing of crisis pregnancy centers, not at all. As a matter of fact i talked about how they came after that pastor uh and and attacked him instead of investigating especially when he tried to get the pictures back so uh now the story is and it's an international story here portland officials say statewide attacks on electrical substations were deliberate. Seven plants across America sabotaged amid suspicion. It's a right wing protest over drag events. This is coming from the Daily Mail. This is put out by the Drudge Report.

So now the government conspiracy theory is growing. The government says something, the media amplifies it, the government amplifies it, it's back and forth. It's an echo chamber, isn't it? Two Portland electrical substations, they're not plants, they're just substations. So they're inaccurate about that. Two Portland electrical substations were deliberately targeted last month, officials reveal,

amid several other States reporting attacks. Yeah, that happened to me too. Yeah. Yeah. All of the liberals are calling in and reporting it. Now the liberal politicians places like port Washington state, uh,

power at the substations left residents briefly without power on Thanksgiving. The attack comes as North Carolina and Washington are also being targeted. The FBI is now probing whether or not this was done by opponents of a drag show. What a joke. Did they tie any of these supposed attacks in other places? Did they tie any of those to drag shows to conservatives. So they're saying that it's premeditated and that it was triggered by opponents of a drag show. So the BPA spokesperson said,

we have confirmed that this is a malicious intent. It was no accident. So therefore it must be conservatives because, you know, only conservatives are malicious. Again, an ex-army PSYOP said, I think I know why this happened. And that's one of the things that kicked this off. But, you know, nothing to see there about any of this. I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

We actually have increased security around substations in the area just as a precaution to ratchet up from what we typically do, they said. Remember when Karen took you guys to Big Hole because we were curious about what was going on there? They don't have that kind of security around these places. This is a Cold War site, a massive hole that was there in North Carolina outside of Raleigh, close to where we live. And all these people were saying, oh, you look pretty close to big hole. Oh, I'm a big hole. What's that?

So we started looking at it. Karen got curious one day. She was driving. She had the kids in the car. And so she drives into this thing and everybody says, oh, yes, shut down a long time ago. You know, we had pretty much all the guys in local politics. Anybody who was anyone had worked at one point in time at Big Hole.

It was an AT&T station. As a matter of fact, it figured prominently in the book Raven Rock, the plan for the government to save itself and let everybody else die. And the book begins with Nixon on the plane going to California after he's resigned. And they're talking about, you know, the transfer of power over the nuclear football and that type of thing. And, um, uh, and it starts with big hole and then it gets transferred to another site and

another site and that type of thing. And they've got some of these, um, in New York city, there's a very severe looking building, a brutalist architecture that was one of these, um, hardened facilities for AT&T and that type of thing. So they thought it was empty. And so let's just go see what's down here. I'm really curious now. And so she drives down there, they go just a little ways and,. And this so-called empty facility that was shut down years ago, all these speakers come

turn back. You're in a secure area. Okay. We'll stop at this point. But again, investigators now determining if the backlash of the 18 or older drag queen show leading up to the performance, led to the targeted attack. Organizers of the drag show revealed

that right-wing activists had tried to shut down the event for weeks, leading up to it. Nobody there the day of. Again, come on. People were really upset about that. There was no protesters there. And again, this was not one of the kiddie things. It wasn't drag queen

story time it was a conservative area in response to the threats extra security was hired for that saturday event the number of rounds fired at the two electrical facilities so now they jump back to violence you know here's the here's the drag queen now let's go to a paragraph about violence and um that's what's up attacks and blackouts across the u.s. drag queens hardest hit that's exactly what they're trying to tell everybody and look you know they they got they got people saying things that they didn't like that there and then the next thing you know they go into the shots a number of shots were fired at the two electrical facilities it hasn't been clarified and no arrests

have been made guess what at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you that's why every day of the festival we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie shot even uh this was uh downtown divas a live drag show uh this is um the portrait for a poster fort uh hosted by naomi dicks yeah and some other double entendres that are there um so uh is there a picture of the of the thing and showing bullet bullet wounds there's a

a bullet so oh okay there is one picture there we go yeah let me see that move that over to the side there where i can see it um and uh that's it that's how i missed it it looks like it was shot looks like uh it looks like some corrugated aluminum that was shot with a.22. I mean, be afraid. Be very afraid. These conservatives, we got to defend our drag queens. They are under attack. And they are, as we were told at the beginning of the Ukraine war, they are what America is about.

And that's actually true. That is what our government, our American government, is about right now. That's what they're all about. The FBI, the CIA, Homeland Security, protect the drag queens. The Department of Homeland Security

and the Department of Intelligence and Analysis within DHS warned early this year, that domestic extremists have developed credible specific plans to attack electricity infrastructure since at least 2020. And we all know who the terrorists are. They, they put out the bill of the bulletins quarterly. It's conservatives.

It's conservatives and Christians and white people. They are the terrorists and be a very, you know, be very afraid. So ABC news says the feds are investigating multiple reports of recent utility company sabotage. Uh, it's all the usual suspects. And by that,

I mean, ABC, NBC, the FBI, Portland, Washington state, all the rest of this stuff. As a matter of fact,

uh, this is the poster I had before. Kyle Rittenhouse deserves an award for his melodramatic performance on The Witness, Dan, said USA Today, November 2021. Then October 2022, USA Today, Wisconsin Christmas Parade defendant gives tearful opening statement. There's two sides to every story. Yeah, it's just amazing to me to see how these people operate. Biden is imposing strict climate change mandates on the Pentagon now. You know, I look at this and I just wonder, how did we ever win any wars without the military MacGuffin mandates of making sure that all of our soldiers are vaccinated with experimental vaccines and that we have vetted all of the contractors to the Pentagon for their climate footprint. How did we have managed to win a war?

Do you think they would have stopped for that as America was the arsenal of democracy and they were grabbing Rosie to put on rivets at the factory? They weren't cared about footprints. And it's the most, this I think is the most absurd of all the climate articles that I have seen because we're talking about people who are driving tanks that I don't know use how many gallons per mile, not miles per gallon, but gallons per mile. We're talking about people who are flying fighter jets. I mean, you got one goal. How fast can I go? Hey, we've got incoming missiles coming in, put on the afterburners. I can't, do you realize what it would do to global warming if I were to kick on these afterburners? Uh it's that kind of stuff yeah don't don't deploy the chaff you know that that stuff uh pollutes the rivers and things like that uh these are people who are blowing stuff up

uh that's the essence of war they're worried about carbon dioxide they're worried about global warming these are people who are working with nuclear bombs. But, you know, we want to make sure that the contractors that are producing the nuclear bombs by the thousands have zero emissions at their factories. That's what they're doing right now. That's how ridiculous this is. Let's make thousands of nuclear bombs, but we got to protect the planet. So let's talk about your emissions at your plant. They're going to require federal contractors now to disclose and reduce their CO2 emissions

as well as do a climate financial risk assessment. This is, again, as I pointed out yesterday, the Federal Reserve is getting banks to do this. All of this obsession about carbon footprints and all the rest of the stuff is to push for a global carbon tax to fund a global governance. And it is to justify tracking everything that you do, every activity, all the food, everything that you buy, and putting a number on that. Because, you know, I mean, if you're going to do this for the military, you certainly got to do it for you as well, right? Weapon manufacturers would have to quantify and disclose the amount of CO2 generated from their own facilities. Yeah, you're making that daisy cutter bomb? Okay, but what are your missions at your factory here?

They said they're going to have science-based targets, quote-unquote, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement. They don't call it a treaty. They call it an agreement. It is a treaty. It could have been stopped at any point in time by Mitch McConnell, and I just point that out every time I come to this Paris thing.

You want to know if Mitch McConnell is a traitor? Just look at that. All he had to do was to call a vote. All the years that he was in, they had the majority in the Senate. They would never have gotten the 60 votes to push this thing through. And so it was not just a betrayal by Obama and Kerry who self-ratified it. Mitch McConnell ratified it for them, even more importantly. He covered for them.

It means the contractors have to aim for zero emissions and require their subcontractors to do it as well. They want to cripple our military. They want to purge out anybody who is concerned about lawful constitutional orders. That's what they're working on. But, of course, they said, well, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies have to redesign weapon systems and aircraft to be powered by lithium-ion batteries because we don't want to have any pollution until we explode the bomb. The proposed rule would also apply to non-defense contractors, including the pharmaceutical companies that they're using to poison soldiers and sailors and airmen.

But, of course, we know how this is going to roll out. Uh, Pfizer, Moderna will just say, we have no emissions and say, oh, okay, fine.

Uh, we got it. Uh, question of the day, Pentagon, do you think of Biden's new and costly? What do you think of his new and costly green mandate for weapons? Well,

Pentagon is going to love it. Of course, because they'll get bigger budgets. And they will ignore these targets. They will lie about them. But I'm sure that there will be an announcement very soon that Biden has Russia, China, and North Korea agreeing to play by the same rules. Because, you know, we all have to, even though we've got our little bit of differences, you know, between North Korea and other people. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.

The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro if your horse loses on a selected race. that's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gamblingcare.ie now we've all got to come together to save the planet. We'll be right back. Thank you. And now, The David Knight Show. By the way, in one hour, we're going to be joined by a man who is setting up, trying to set up, a network of blood donors and hospitals and healthcare providers that will work with people who want to use safe blood. That's the name of his organization.

We're going to talk about that, and we're going to talk about what's just happened in New Zealand. The updates of it, I've got some just horrific videos of them snatching the baby from the family. Uh, over a hundred people got arrested there. So, uh, we're going to talk about that. What is the status of this? Um, you know, what are the obstacles in our way? Uh, by various governments that he's, um, set up to operate in Europe. And of course, the five eyes countries, uh, the U S Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, uh, but, uh, let's, before we get into that, let's talk about what's coming to everybody. I want to mention this again, because this is something they're setting up to

entrap people, the Biden administration, a snare for people who work gigs, people who sell online, uh, the thing where instead of having to, um, uh, report, if you've got a whole bunch of them, you know, and $20,000 level was what it used to be. Now that he's lowered it to 600, you get a $600 payment. You got to report it. People got a cross file paperwork on each other. That type of thing. It's crazy. It's crazy. Uh, a woods woods. Thank you very much for the tip. hundred dollar payment you got to report it people got a cross file paperwork on each other that type of thing it's crazy it's crazy uh a woods woods thank you very much for the tip he says david

per listener the other day dealing with stage four brain cancer a friend had the same prognosis surgery to no avail three months terminal they said they drank guanabana soursop, S-O-U-R-S-O-P. It leaves, it was an eight ounce blended with water twice a day. He just died a year ago, 20 years past the doctor's anticipated expiration date. Though never overcoming the damage from the tumor removal surgery, he outlived everyone's expectations. Uh, so yeah,

that's always important to, uh, try different things. Uh, there was, uh, I don't remember if I, if I covered it on the news or not,

I see so many different articles. There was one from vaccine impact talking about, you know, here's some of the, I think I did talk about that. about, you know, here's some of the, I think I did talk about that. You know, what can you do if you've taken the vaccine or what can you do about the risk of shedding? I did talk about that because I talked about Dr. Peter McCullough as well. And one of the key things is very simple, fasting. Fasting can be very, very powerful to help your

body to recover. And Chris, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Let's talk about the IRS though. As I point out, the nearly $2 trillion COVID relief bill provided funding for a number of projects across the country, extended financial relief to those who are still recovering from the impact of the pandemic and amended a section of the IRS tax code, specifically section 60 50 W this is coming from freight waves. And this is a big concern for them because there are so many truckers who are independent contractors and they're targeting this towards small businesses.

This is, this is not about money, folks. Look, Biden and the Democrats, in case nobody's noticed, don't care about deficits. And oh, by the way, neither did the Republicans. There was only one member of Congress when Trump came up with his nearly $4 trillion bill. There was only one member of Congress, Senate and House that pushed back against that, and that was Thomas Massey. And remember how furious Trump was? You're getting in my way of my bill, my idea? Let's get this guy out of office. Fortunately, he didn't. But he was the only one who had objections to that stuff. The only one. And so nobody cares about the deficit. So why do they

care about an income tax? It's never come even close to balancing things, right? Balancing the budget. And yet we have to have it. And they fight over whether they're going to raise it a little bit or lower it or who they're going to tax and who they're going to give tax relief to. It's simply a way for them to control us, right? We vote for party A instead of party B because party A is going to help us and give us tax relief, whereas party B is going to hurt us. But party B will help some other people with their tax relief programs and giveaways and things like that. So it's another one of these things where the two parties can build a demographic, a base of support. But there's absolutely no reason for it. They don't care about the deficit.

What they care about is they want to manipulate you for election purposes. And they want to make sure that you don't have any disposable income. They want to make sure that you don't have any disposable income. They want to make sure that you don't have any wealth. And they want to make sure that you don't accumulate any capital because you could go in business against them. So this is specifically why this is happening, to come after small businesses. All the small businesses that Trump said were not essential.

It was only the Walmart and the big box retailers that trade on Wall Street that were essential during the lockdown. Everybody else was non-essential, right? So that's what this is ultimately about. The income tax is nothing other than a tactic of control, surveillance, use it to attack their enemies, blackmail people, and to keep the middle class from accumulating any wealth or having any money to spend. They want to keep you dependent and they want to use it to control people politically. As taxpayers gather tax records, says the IRS, they should remember that most income is taxable.

And this includes unemployment income, refund interest, and income from the gig economy and digital assets. Therefore, we have added a new section to come after you even harder. The Coalition for 1099K Fairness says, without timely congressional action, millions of Americans and fledgling micro-businesses will begin receiving 1099Ks in January 2023, often in instances where there is no tax liability whatsoever, creating significant confusion and administrative challenges, and creating the opportunity for the IRS to audit people they don't like politically using their brand new 87,000 IRS agents when they get them hired.

Now, who is in this coalition for 1099 K fairness? It's the people who are going to be having to issue all these 1099 Ks to everybody. eBay. eBay. Yeah. You sell something on eBay. Oh, was it more than six? Okay. Now we got to generate paperwork for that person. Etsy, uh, Airbnb. And of course, uh, PayPal is going to

be there and other companies like that. Uh, so they've come together in this coalition to try to stop this, uh, DoorDash, Etsy, Lyft, uh, even Walmart and Amazon marketplace. Um, so it's big companies that don't want to generate these things, but once they generate them, if they don't get this thing stopped, once they generate them, then it's going to percolate out. There's going to be a, you know, wait, we got, this was sent by the IRS and you didn't report it, that type of thing. Uh, and it gets to be a mess. Uh, I, I got 1099

once simply because I have a common name. And, um, there was a guy named David Knight when we were living in Raleigh. He did, uh, some contract work for somebody who's making furniture and the company sent me a 1099. And I said, you got the wrong person. Oh, well, we just went to the phone book. We didn't have his address, so we just went to the phone book. And you were the first one who came up in the phone book, First David Knight, so we just sent it to you.

So we better fix that. And they didn't. And so in a couple of years, it became an issue with the IRS. Just crazy stuff like that. And that's what's going to be happening to everybody, thanks to the Biden administration. And so the response from the Democrats is, even the Democrats are starting to push back on this because we've got a lot of big companies that are really angry about all this paperwork. And so some Democrats in Congress, as I've told you before, they said, well, it used to be 20,000 was a trigger. Let's take it back up to 5,000. You got some Republicans that say, well, let's take it back to 20,000. But nobody wants to say, why are we doing an

income tax anyway when we don't care about the deficit. The IRS estimates the tax change will generate $8.4 billion in additional tax revenue over a decade. Well, how do they know that? They don't. They're just coming up with a number. They don't know how much it's going to. But that's over a decade. They're going to give $38 billion in just a couple of months,

in addition to the over $100 billion that they've given to Ukraine. Why do they care about this? As a matter of fact, I said last night on the premier program, we were talking a little bit about Ukraine. And I said, I went back and I looked to see, since this $38 billion program is kicking through in addition, and they just passed the big NDAA funding, but they got to do this additionally.

And so I started looking, I thought, what was the gross domestic product of Ukraine for the last few years? I went back and looked at it for the last several years. It was $150 billion. We're going to give them more than a hundred billion. We may give them the entire annual gross domestic product before the year is out, Biden may, because they keep adding more and escalating it. There seems to be no end in sight. And so we're probably going to wind up giving them their full GDP, annual GDP. But when I looked it up, it was kind of interesting because

it was popping around, you know, $150 billion a year was their gross domestic product. And then all of a sudden, in 2021, the year before, you know, it wasn't until February or March that Putin invaded. But a year before, all of a sudden, their gross domestic product jumped up to $200 billion. How did that happen? And why did nobody notice that? You know, were we front-loading this because we had planned this war? Because they knew it was going to happen. As a matter of fact, I've played many times the interview with Arestovich.

You know, Zelensky ran on a platform of peace because they'd been at war and bombing civilians for five years in the Donbass. And so then he gets elected in 2019 on a platform of peace. And immediately his guy, Arestovich, says there's not going to be any peace. It's going to continue. As a matter of fact, in three years, in 2022, we're going to go to war with Russia. And the entire country is going to be destroyed. But we'll get into NATO.

So it's worth it. That's what he said in a live interview. I've played that for you many times. Now, they knew that they were going to do this. And they knew they were going to do it in 2022. And so all of a sudden, their GDP goes from $150 to $200 billion. And I think that was what was happening. Otherwise.

What was it that flipped the switch. In Ukraine. Did they invent. A practical means of fusion. Or something like that. How did they increase their gross domestic product. By a third. What was the economic miracle.

Of Ukraine. It was giving. At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie It was giving NATO the war that they wanted.

That was their economic miracle. We'll be right back This is The David Knight Show. Well, I had a listener send me an email. He's very upset because of what he saw at the Alex Jones broadcast, emergency live broadcast, globalists in full panic as Americans hold vaccine makers liable over mRNA claims. Well, actually, that didn't happen.

You had DeSantis say he's going to look into it. But he's still allowing this to be sold. He knows better. We all know better. But, you know, Alex is all about promoting DeSantis now. But this guy sent this to me. Um, and, um,

uh, it was sent, uh, by, uh, Regan who said, uh, Alex said in the first 60 seconds of his three hour broadcast that we can't hold Trump accountable for the jab because the CDC lied to him that it was

safe. He and everybody knows fully. Well, this is not true. Zero plausible deniability. It is terrible, it is dangerous, and the audacity to dress his voice as a Christian voice, judging the tree by its fruit, is reprehensible. Sorry I run to you blubbering like this.

I guess I want you to call him out for this, because it is beyond the pale and kind of painful. And he, um, says yes. And it is P A I L talks about the, and I like to see where these things come from. He said, uh, pale is bloody.

Well, correct. As this English colloquialism refers to the pales that were filled with cement and which fence posts were sunk when the building fences surrounding a churchyard burial grounds when a member of the congregation committed suicide his grave was relegated to the ground outside of that encompassed by the fence hence he was laid to rest beyond the pale p i p a i l well we have seen this before and um this is why i say it is anger tainment it is a distraction from the real issues and i talk about this not just because he sent me this letter because also we have seen now within the last week i guess it

was i don't know when kanye and and nick fuentes I guess it was about a week ago, went on for the entire program with Alex. It was angertainment. You know, it was just, hey, look at this. Look at me. Anything for views. And then when it blew up on him because it was such a train wreck, he came out a couple of days after that. And he threw his sidekick, nick fuentes under the bus the guy that was always there by his side the two of them were inseparable through all this stop the steel

lies and grifting that ruined the lives of so many people january the 6th fleeced people so much money the two of them inseparable fuentes and alex alex has basically built fuentes up at info wars and um so then he comes out and he calls him you know says he's infatuated with these uniforms he's homoerotic and um so fuentes says, he's just simply controlled opposition. But he's also talking about Kanye. So after going on Crowder and calling him homoerotic, then within a couple of days after that, Kanye is back on InfoWars. I think it was yesterday. Back on InfoWars, introducing his new album or a tune from his new album.

And it's all just celebrity distraction and getting people angry at each other, breaking people into different groups, and, of course, covering for Donald Trump. For the longest time, you know, it was back in August that Alex came out and said, well, I'm done with Trump. He keeps talking about the vaccine, and I'm just done with it. Because he couldn't keep cheering Trump while Trump was doing that because everybody was catching on to that and starting to get angry with Trump. So Trump has shut up about that now, finally. And so Alex now doesn't have any downside to cheering Trump.

Hey, he was just lied to. He doesn't know what's going on, but he's the guy who's smart enough to play 4D chess and he can save us. Somebody put this together. I am supporting DeSantis. August 17th. I see the real sincerity. I'm a DeSantis guy.

This is my emergency message to august 20th president mr president i know you've tried to reach out and i missed the call i'm only for desantis and then i've abandoned you that's not true it's the contrary i still love you and he's not talking to trump you understand right he's talking to his fan base. That's why he did the desert reversals after two or three days. Uh, he's talking to his base. He's hunting for demographics, just like Matt Tabe talked about mainstream media. Alex does the same thing. And, um, how many times have we seen him go full on against Trump, you know, August, uh, 23rd. So he does that, you know, August 17th. No, no, no. I'm, uh, I I'm all the Santas. And then on August 17th, no, no, no, I'm all DeSantis.

And then on the 22nd, no, no, no. Then on the 23rd, all right, I'm done with all this stuff with Trump. And if he doesn't come clean about these vaccines in another 30 days, I'm going to do something about it. Crickets, nothing happened. And now here we are. That was August, September. Here we are in December and he's now covering for Trump yet again, yet again. So, uh, he said, uh, it's not

to hurt Trump. It's so the people can know how pathetic he is. When you think he's playing 40 chess, he's going to save you. And he's not, why would they think that who who used that phrase incessantly that was alex it was alex who was telling people he was playing 4d chess he said trump is telling people that he's playing 4d chess and it's pathetic uh he's projecting all this stuff on that he's projecting that 4d chess stuff onto trump so yeah he's back's back and forth. He loves me. He loves me not, this Daisy thing. As a matter of fact, going back to December of 2021, Jones threatens to dish dirt on Trump about the vaccine. He knows what's going on.

He knew throughout 2020 what was going on. He keeps refusing to dish the dirt publicly. Privately, it's a different story. He knows exactly what he's doing. But he applauds these half measures now of DeSantis. Because DeSantis knows. Everybody knows what these vaccines are about. Alex knows.

DeSantis knows. DeSantis' public health guy knows. But they're not going to stop the poisoning. They're going to play around with the edges of this. They're going to go just how, you know, they're going to play the audience. They can read the room. They know the room wants something done. So they'll talk about it.

They'll take some half measures, but they're not going to go to war with big pharma. DeSantis is not going to do it. He's going to go half measures. He'll go partial. He's not going to call it what it is. Poison. So it's all a distraction. The DeSantis stuff is a distraction as well.

Let's talk a little bit about what is happening with the Proud Boys. This is a very interesting situation that has arisen. Because the leader, Enrique Terrio, now, you know, it was Darren Beattie who has a revolver. You know, he's called him an agent provocateur, you know, somebody who's an informant for the FBI. I think there's a good case to be made for that for Enrique Terrio. But he also said that about Stuart Rhodes.

And when Stuart Rhodes was charged with seditious conspiracy, he said, that just proves the point that he's working with the FBI, because there's no way you're going to get a conviction on that. Well, now we see what's happened. And he was the one who was focused on Ray Epps. I don't know what's going on with Ray Epps. I'm not interested in throwing anybody under the bus with any of this stuff. But look, Enrico Terrio, I thought from the very beginning it was very suspicious because they got him out of the area, arrested him on, you know, well, you were arrested for this minor thing here and we're going to take you out of D.C. again. And they moved him out, which I thought was really a strange way to do that. Because information come out that he had in the past been an informant for government when he got into trouble.

And now something interesting has happened. There is a big fight over whether or not testimony from a Metropolitan Police Lieutenant, Shane Lammond, that was in constant contact with Enrico Terrio about the January 6th stuff. There's a question about whether or not his testimony is going to be allowed. So the defense wants him there. At LiveScore Bet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.

That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is Total Betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply.

Bet responsibly. 18 plus gamblingcare.ee. And they say Lamond plans to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination if he's called to the witness stand. After prosecutors warned the officer that he could be charged with obstructing the investigation if he talks on the witness stand. There's a lot of levels to this stuff. It is a corrupt political case, no doubt about it. The attorneys for the Proud Boys say they have accused the Justice Department

of trying to bully this police lieutenant, Lamond, into keeping quiet because his testimony would hurt their case. Prosecutors have denied that charge, but we have seen over and over again with these politicized charges, especially things like the trial of Ross Ulbrich, they will stop the jury from hearing exculpatory evidence that would bring into question what was really happening here. For example, in the case of Ross Ulbricht and Silk Road, you had two FBI agents that had the keys to the website, and they embezzled out nearly a million dollars. And they had been charged and were undergoing a trial for that. They had the keys to do everything. So anything that, you know, what the government wanted everybody to believe was that Ross Ulbrich was the sole person in charge of Silk Road.

And that anything that happened, any criminal activity, was simply Ross Ulbrich. And yet at that time, you had two FBI agents who had been indicted and were being tried for embezzling massive amounts of money and doing other things, having complete control as well. And the defense, or rather the prosecution, would not allow anything to be said about that. Wouldn't allow anything to be said about that. Wouldn't allow anything to be said about that. When we look at the Bundy Ranch standoff, you had pictures of a guy who was laying on his stomach and pointing a rifle through the gap and the concrete barriers on the overpass. Well, we don't know who he was pointing out, if anybody.

But we did see in that picture that all the people around him were hunkered down. So it's like, so what's on the other side of that? They were not allowed to ask that question. Why were these people afraid of their line? No, you can't say anything about that. You can't say anything about the fact that the government was pointing weapons at people on the other side in full body armor. I was one of the people they were pointing guns at.

I was down on the ground with that. So, you know, you look at this and how they cover up exculpatory evidence all the time. So going back to this case, Enrico Terrio was not in Washington when the riot erupted. Shortly before the riot, it posted on social media that the group planned to turn out in record numbers on January the 6th, but would be incognito instead of having their traditional clothing colors. He said it was so that they would not be attacked. Theriot's lawyers say that the police Lieutenant Lamond has been under

investigation for some time for possible obstruction of justice and the investigation of the proud boys leader. Lamond was placed on administrative leave by the police force in February. And an attorney said an attorney for the officer. He said Lamond is a decorated veteran of the D.C. Police Department, doesn't share any of the indefensible positions of the extremist groups, quote unquote. He was an intelligence officer for the police force.

He was responsible for monitoring groups like the Proud Boys when they came to Washington. Theriot regularly communicated with Lamond before the Proud Boys came to the capital city to discuss the purpose of the trip, the agenda, and the location, say defense lawyers. Theriault told Lamond that the Proud Boys would not be wearing their traditional colors to protect themselves. He told the officer they planned to watch Trump's speech, protest the results of the election, and later that night they planned to party with plenty of beers and babes, he said.

So the question is this. How can there be sedition if the Proud Boys are informing law enforcement of their plans for January the 6th? They don't want him to testify, said the lawyers for the Proud Boys, because it will completely destroy their case. And as I point out, Enrique had previously worked undercover, cooperated with investigators after he was accused of fraud in 2012. Theriot's indictment for participating in a scheme involving the resale of diabetic test strips,

he helped the government prosecute more than a dozen other people. So, you know, we look at it. I honestly think, well, I'm, my opinion, a hundred percent is that these people shut you up. The Stuart Rhodes and the people that were there, they got caught up in their little fantasy LARPing, live action role-playing. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, what is this? But the guys who are the Proud Boys, they like to brawl. They like to fight.

They got their blood up, you know, and push came to shove, and there was some violence there. But look, they don't deserve to go to jail for the rest of their lives. There was certainly no insurrection that was happening there. It's just absolutely... It's just another one of these things that we see the government doing all the time. And it is all political,

just like they won't investigate the arson attacks against these... The FBI won't against these crisis pregnancy centers. Now they have found classified items of classified markings found at the Trump storage unit in Florida and its storage unit. Maybe, maybe he's got some of the stuff we lost, you know, had a great poster that I really liked and we can't find it anywhere. Um, so we got lost in the storage unit and the move or something. I don't know what's happened. Maybe Trump's got it.

I bet he does. Even though he's in Palm beach and we were in Texas. Uh, but, uh, yeah, it's, um, here's the thing, you know, Andrew Napolitano, judge Napolitano had said before everybody was talking about, well, were these classified documents, were they important, whatever. He said, look, there's a law. He says, I don't agree with the law. I think the law, and I've spoken many times about how the law is way over the top. But he said, there are documents that belong to certain departments, and they have to be kept in in certain places and it doesn't matter what their classification is and he said and so the very fact that these documents

were you know at mar-a-lago or now we could say in a storage unit uh whether or not they have the classified markings on them that's not necessary they're going with the classified markings simply because um this is a a narrative that they're creating for people so um two documents with classified markings found in a florida storage unit during a search by a team that was hired by trump's lawyer person familiar with the situation told cnn um andromeda one thank you very much for the tip. Dear David, Merry Christmas to you and your family. Thank you very much. Thank you. And Eric Gavarmi, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. Thank you, all of you. Appreciate that a lot. You know, Trump has got a problem. Alex is for him, he's against him, he's for him, he's against him.

But since the election, things have gotten pretty bad for Trump. Even the Babylon Bee has turned against him after this latest debacle in Georgia, where Trump had handpicked Herschel Walker, got him to move to Georgia specifically to run for this. I mean, you talk about judgment. Here's what the Babylon Bee says. Trump brags he's the first president ever to lose the Senate even after being president. They said it couldn't be done, but I did it. A tremendous accomplishment.

Frankly, I lost Georgia twice. Can you believe it? It's true. No one could do that but me no one is better at losing senate races than i am said trump they all said oh oh donald you can't do that that would be bad but we proved them all wrong this is all part of my 4d chess plan alex is famous for that the 4d chess plan that's all part of my 4D chess plan to make America great again. Trump then announced that he has a new list of potential candidates to run against Warnock in the next election, including Dr.

Phil OJ Simpson and Carrot Top, who, according to Trump, has said some very nice things about me. Yes. Carrot Top. Yes. Carrot Top, who, according to Trump, has said some very nice things about me. Yes, Carrot Top. Yes, Carrot Top. He's a very fine person who supports MAGA. He will make a great senator. Way better than Weird Warnick. Yeah, Weird Warnick. I call him that.

It's a great nickname. Well, they got it down, don't they? That's what's happened. Other people are saying, did Herschel Walker just end Trump's presidential hopes? Well, no, actually Trump did. Because it's not just Herschel Walker. You know, it's this Dr. Oz nonsense. I mean, seriously, you can't beat Frankenstein?

That is so pathetic stumbling mumbling fumbling herschel walker finally flopped out of the georgia senate race but while walker can probably will just exit politics and sink back into semi-obscurity the man who dragged him into the race and who imposed a demonstrably unqualified candidate. This is coming from the Hill, by the way. On Georgia Republicans is now stuck dealing with the damage. Trump plucked Walker out of nowhere and dropped him into the race. He was the only Republican to lose a statewide race in Georgia. From governor to labor commissioner and in the last days of the race Trump avoided his hand-picked candidate in the final days because he

knew that he was going to go down you know who didn't know that herschel walker was going to lose this prophet from God she she says. Julie Green. Julie Green was certain that Walker was going to win. God was going to make it happen, and God told Julie Green. Here's what she had to say. My children, many warnings I have given to you, but there is coming a day that it will be too late. So listen to these words

and listen to my prophets. Dare to believe me more than your enemies. More than religion. More than the news stations. More than the Bible. More than your doctors. More than your bank accounts.

Dare to believe me more than what you see and what you hear. Herschel Walker will be in the news and victory will be with his name. Is this going to finally be the last hurrah of Julie? No, she's still doing live, um, you know, zoom conferences with Eric Trump. Who says, yes, he wakes up every morning at four 30 and does the pledge of allegiance with his kids. Yes, it does. That's how he keeps his family straight. And then they have, um, they say an, our father.

So they do the pledge of allegiance and say our father and um she did this just did this the last day or so and of course the third party that was on the line was this clay guy or whoever it is it's running this um uh these series of events where he has uh eric trump Lindell and Roger Stone and Michael Flynn going to these gigantic churches where they spend tens of millions of dollars on their building. And then Michael Flynn leads people in an occultic prayer from this other false prophet 40 years ago.

It was a cult around nuclear war, Elizabeth Clare prophet. But they got Julie Green. She's there all the time. And, you know, we had a word from God that Trump was going to be in office. Herschel Walker was going to be in office. But no matter how many times this woman who says she's speaking for God lies, no matter how many times she gets caught out, they keep going back to her. So, again, Trump meeting with the excreble Nick Fuentes and Yee,

or Kanye or whatever, says the Hill, alienated large swaths of conservatives, even Breitbart. Of course, it didn't alienate Alex and his people there, none at all. He's making the wrong moves. He's losing in court. Is he self-destructing? Well, we'll talk about that when we come back. Stay with us.

We'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show well we have uh we have an investigation that's found out what happened to this massive freighter that got stuck in chesapeake bay for over a month and uh the ship was called the ever Forward, which didn't go forward. It got stuck. And we now find out that the person who was supposed to be driving it was using a cell phone when he grounded the massive ship. See, this is why it's so imperative for Apple to get self-driving cars for $120,000 so that you can drive down the road and play games. That's what they were talking about.

You know, we'll put it on the interstate and, you know, you can use that to play games. You spend $120,000 just so that you can have a autopilot take over on the interstate and you can play games so maybe they'll start to introduce that for these freighters since the guy who was the pilot cannot wait to get on his phone he had one job he had one job and he didn't do it and so this and this is massive this thing is 1100 feet long it carries nearly 5 000000, 4,964 containers. That's what it had on it when it was grounded. It was grounded for a month. And the only way they were able to get this thing unstuck was to dredge out a tremendous amount of the, they had to move, I've got it here,

I'll get it in just a second. But it's just amazing what they had to do. They said, the Coast Guard said, this was caused by the pilot's failure to maintain situational awareness. Yeah, I wouldn't say that. And attention. That's an understatement, isn't it? While navigating. And also, inadequate bridge resource management.

And so the Coast Guard had a recommendation for the future here. They recommended that, quote, marine operators develop and implement effective policies outlining when the use of cell phones and other portable electronic devices is appropriate and when it is prohibited. I think that'd be a good idea, don't you? I mean, wouldn't you think they would have done that already? So again, it took a month, and they had to dredge out 206,000 cubic yards of mud out of the harbor, wherever it was that it was stuck there in Chesapeake Bay. And they had to remove 505 containers to lighten the ship's load.

That was about half. I mean, it was 1,100 containers, wasn't it? Let's see. Or was it? No, it was 5,000 containers. So they had to, it was still 500 containers that they had to get rid of. Pretty amazing, the idiocracy that we live. Have you ever, my entire life we didn't have uh cell phones

and we would have never had something like that happening you know some guy on the bridge playing with his cell phone uh and we now have zielinski as time magazine's person of the year uh i think they should start calling him instead of vladimir they should start calling him voldemort and i say that because they noticed that they didn't want to call him Vladimir because it was too much like Putin. So they started spelling it Volodymyr, V-O-L-O-D-Y-M-Y-R. Well, you know, it's the same as Vladimir. They both have the same first name. But I think Voldemort is far more descriptive, anyway, of the guy's character. It's just amazing. I saw a tweet from Gerald Cilenti.

He was furious about this, as you can imagine. And so he went down some of the curriculum vitae of this guy and his history, to say the least uh they are out there actually telling people that um the ukrainians are now telling people because it's christmas time i talked about this last night that we do not want to have uh trichosky performed you know don't do the nutcracker suite and there was a cry of relief that went out from husbands and fathers all over the world. We don't have to go to that ballet this year. But, you know, they're shutting down Boris Gudanov. I guess he's not Gudanov for them this year, but they're doing it everywhere. We're going to have coming up, and I'm going to go to this a little bit early, but at the top of the hour, we're going

to be joined by a guest who is going to be talking about safe blood. And I want to play for you a little bit of what happened in the last couple of days over this child. The baby who has to have an emergency operation. And the parents said, yeah, we don't have any problem with the operation but because this child's got a heart problem we would like him to not have vaccinated blood and we got people who are the child's blood type who would like to donate blood hospital said no way you're going to do that we're not going to allow that to happen and uh they had um they had dozens of people who had volunteered to donate blood. And the surgeon, as I pointed out before, made an issue out of it.

Instead of just allowing that to happen, made an issue out of it. No, you're going to use our blood. And we're not going to make a distinction between vaccinated and unvaccinated. You know, we don't want to ostracize the people based on their vaccine choices, do we? Really? Uh, yeah. What have they been doing for the last two years anyway? Um, so they wound up getting a court to give the doctor, uh, make, make the doctor a legal guardian for the purpose of this operation. And the police came in and removed the child. And I want to play for you a little bit of the video.

It's a very heart-rending video that is very long, but I'm only just going to play a little bit of it. This is the kidnapping process. We're not going to allow the baby to sleep or have his pre-op checks. These cops are there. They have bulletproof vests and stab-proof vests. I think, like, the baby needs as much rest as possible

so that he can... Excuse me, what are you doing? Go over and take the baby out of the crib. Hey, don't do it. Please don't do it. Hey. You know, we're talking about the surgery. You guys are criminals.

You are criminals. You are conducting a criminal act here! So with the pre-op check, it needs to happen before the surgery. We've been talking to you like rational people and now you've just removed... You are criminals. Oh my gosh!

How can you do this? Oh my gosh! Get out of my way! Get out of my way! Guys, move out! out of my way! Get out of my way! Get out of my way! Guys, move out! Move out the way! You guys are acting like criminals! You are acting like criminals!

They're standing there so that the mother can't get to the baby. You are criminals! Hey guys, calm down, please. You are criminals! You are a criminal, you are a criminal, You are a criminal. And so are you. And so are you. Can you guys just give them some space, please? You are a criminal. You will not be part of the surgery tomorrow. We do not authorise any of that.

I just want to tell you what's happening. No, we're not listening to what you've got to say. Why did you do that? Is this going to be okay? No, it is not going to be okay. And we need to take him for his own. say yeah this is the kind of what did I call it that the Daily Beast and the anti-defamation league got so upset one of the reasons why I get kicked off of YouTube shadow banned beyond belief on on Twitter nothing gets out I called it medical martial law is it medical martial is that medical martial law physically taking a child away from the parents

so that you can uh you know give them contaminated blood you won't allow any choice any choice no medical choice allowed on anything with these people. And so as this was reported by the New Zealand paper, listen to this, how they skew this. You don't talk about skewed reporting. It's just, this is news.com.au in Australia. The New Zealand Herald reporting. The mother crying, please stop. The dad then steps in and starts calling the officers criminals.

Can you imagine somebody calling those officers criminals? Yeah, because they are, they are. What they did is criminal. It's immoral and it should be illegal if it isn't. You guys are criminals. You are criminals. You were conducting a criminal act here. He says, then this paper says, officers in uniform continue to reason with the parents. Oh, the officers are just so reasonable.

Doing everything they were told, just like the Nazis at Nuremberg. I'm just following orders. I'm just doing what the doctor and the court and the government all said we need to do, which is to kidnap your baby and take it in here and do things that you don't want us to do with it. However, the father continues to argue, says the New Zealand Herald. Boy, that father, he's a bad guy, isn't he? You people are acting like criminals, he said. All of you are criminals. The mother walks up to the staff member and asks, why did you do that? And she says, well, he's going to be okay.

No, he's not going to be okay. You'll be able to see him after the surgery, they say. We're going to take your child, do surgery to him. I mean, we've seen this happen in years past with parents who did not want to have a particular type of cancer treatment under their child. They wanted to try a different type of cancer treatment. No, you're not going to make that decision.

We have decided that our surgery, our radiation, our chemotherapy, that's the only thing that's going to be allowed. And of course, now we see them doing it over everything, over drag queen story time hours as well. They literally hate our kids, but look at what the crowd outside was doing. And this goes on for quite some time. We have all these cops. It's a push and shove and a struggle and a wrestling match for people in the crowd.

Yeah, that's what tyranny looks like. And tyranny has come to the West. No doubt about it. Utopian Lobotomy left a comment on RockFamily. He said, I just watched that video of that baby being kidnapped by the government in New Zealand because the parents are anti-vax. As a father who has custody of my kids when I and their mom were much younger and our kids were still under five, I feel their pain.

It was in a very Marxist feminist state. This is not helping Jab Senda Arden either, the disciple of Klaus Schwab, the head of the New Zealand government. She is running for office, and it appears that she may not make it this time. Let's hope that she doesn't. Let's take a quick break,

and we'll play a little bit of Tchaikovsky for you, just to tweak Voldemort-Zolinski. We'll be right back. Terima kasih telah menonton! you're listening to the david knight show yeah take that zolinski how's that take that tchaikovsky in fight him with tchaikovsky in. Fight him with Tchaikovsky. A Syrian girl says, what the medical bureaucracy really doesn't want is for the people to realize there's a problem with their blood supply. Then everyone would demand unvaxed blood. And we're going to talk about that in about 10 minutes. We're going to talk about the problems of the blood supply. And we're going to talk about whether or not people will be able to come together and do something about it.

So that's what our guest is offering with safeblood.net. Let's talk, though, before we get to him briefly about what's going on with climate. You know, we have to attack this thing at the root. It's important to point out that if the Pentagon is going to play these games about all of our contractors and subcontractors have to tell us about the emissions that they are doing when they're making bombs, because we don't want global warming. I mean, the absurdity of that is beyond belief. But of course, we have to attack the fundamental lie for the most part. It is important to show their hypocrisy and to show that they really don't believe that everything's going to flood and that CO2 is going to warm the planet because they're flying around the private jets. And just like the military doesn't believe it, but, um, it's important to push back on the lies of climate change, 2022 Atlantic hurricane season.

Uh, and, uh, this is from the new American, the hurricane season finishes way below normal. And yet what had they predicted? Well, it was going to be a big hurricane season, right? Uh, for the 2022 hurricane season,

Noah, that's N O A A, uh, the national oceanic, uh, oceanic and atmospheric, uh, administration. I think it's what it stands for. Uh, it was going to be a disaster. They were forecasting, uh, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, I think is what it stands for, was going to be a disaster.

They were forecasting a likely range of 14 to 21 named storms, winds of 39 miles per hour or higher, of which 6 to 10 could be major hurricanes. That's Category 3, 4, or 5, with winds of 111 miles per hour or more. And they gave that prediction with a confidence rate of 70%. Well, again, they were looking for 21 named storms. They didn't get that far in the alphabet. They got up to, I think it was just a little bit beyond Ian.

Fiona and Ian were the only two hurricanes that they had, and neither of them were a class five. So they had 70% confidence in that. These are the experts. They can't predict what's going to happen in a hurricane season. They certainly can't predict what is going to happen decades from now. And their models are broken. There is no connection between CO2 and temperature increasing,

any of that stuff. Their methods of measuring how high water level is globally are nonsense, just like their methods of measuring temperature are nonsense, and they don't have a database to compare this to. It's all based on assumptions. And, you know, you had digital thermometers 100 years ago? No. You can't say that these people had a certain degree of error

in terms of reading this stuff off that was within a degree. It's absolute nonsense. But, of course, they've now moved these thermometers to heat islands and cities and on airports and other things like that. Of course, the most famous one that's come out in the last few weeks is this report from Antarctica, somewhere, I think it was Antarctica, it was somewhere where it was a polar area. And they measured the airport tarmac there where they were taking off military jets and then used that to try to create alarm in the UK.

Recall that there was a long pause, says the New American, in major hurricanes hitting the U.S. from 2005 to 2016. NOAA itself commented on the lack of severe storms. I can confirm that as of October the 24th, 2016, they said at the time, it will be a complete 11 years since a major hurricane has struck the United States as defined by Category 3 or higher. Moreover, the study conducted by a group of people at Princeton, two people at NOAA, Utah State, Iowa,

showed that hurricanes were not growing in intensity. at Princeton, two people at NOAA, Utah State, Iowa, showed that hurricanes were not growing in intensity. They said the record does not show strong evidence of a century-scale increase in either frequency or power associated with the century-scale greenhouse gas-induced warming of the planet. These were climate people there. And so then, you know, take a look at we're all going to be underwater. I'm a daily skeptic. The Mirror in the UK makes a ludicrous claim that large parts of England will be

underwater by 2100, that London could be gone within 80 years, they said. They said, we have terrifying new maps of the UK that predict towns and cities will be vanishing into the sea. As the Daily Skeptic points out, these maps were made by an organization called Climate Central, a green billionaire-backed activist operation that specializes in custom-made flood catastrophes aimed at local media.

Hey, look at what we've got. We've got a terrifying map here. Oh, really? Oh, let me put that up. Because why? They want sensational news, right? It's going to drive people. It's going to get people talking and reading their paper.

Doesn't have to be true. They don't care if it's true. They're not going to vet this stuff. They're not going to ask this organization, Climate Central. They're not going to ask them, based on what? Where's your data? Can I see your data? No, we're the experts.

Just go with this. To counter this, the Daily Skeptic points out that the current annual rate of sea level rise is estimated by NOAA to be 3.1 millimeters with a 13% margin of error. That's a pretty big margin of error. But these areas that they're saying are going to be flooded are one of them, Hull, is 4 meters above sea level, so the current rise, it would take 1290 years to be flooded. That is, if the rates don't change or reverse. These ludicrous forecasts, based partly on probably high temperature increases, assume a sea level rise that is over 30 times faster than it actually is. The bigger picture doesn't escape the mirror either. They said Belgium, Germany, northern France, half of the Netherlands,

all expected to be underwater by 2100. But again, this is a well-funded organization, and this is one of the reasons why I say Elon Musk, beyond even the transhumanism, the singularity, the mind control stuff, the fact that this guy's made all of his money with his green fantasy ought to be disqualifying. Again, Twitter is just a website. It is not essential to free speech. And we need to stop going to these gated, walled, controlled areas to disseminate information. The flood project is said to be funded by 12 foundations, activist academics like Michael Oppenheimer, who is known for once saying, we can't let other countries that have the same number of cars,

the amount of industrialization that we have here in the U.S., we have to stop these third world countries right where they are. You know, kind of like what Obama said when he went to Africa. Y'all can't have air conditioning. We got it, but you can't have it. A country, the world would melt down. And so they're going to take air conditioning away from us too as well. In his recent 2021 State of the Climate Report,

Professor Ole Humlund noted the difficulty surrounding accurate measurement of sea levels, even with the help of satellites. He says it is an imprecise science. You have land gauges that indicate a much lower rise of not three millimeters, but one to two millimeters. Well, again, other people are saying, look, if you go back and with our data, going back and looking at the ice age and what happened after that, climatologist and writer Judith Curry said recent changes in sea level are within the range of natural sea level variability over the past several thousand years. And so you've got a lot

of different ways to measure this. This is not showing up, but here's where this is headed and why we have to oppose this. In Oxford, and I talked about this happening a week or two ago when I was talking to Eric Peters, we were talking about Canterbury and Canterbury was setting up these rings and you could not, you know, they had a complicated situation where you could go different places within the city.

They are trying to control our movement so much that in England, you've got multiple schemes and multiple cities of how they are going to lock you into a zone when i was talking to amman jabby uh yesterday we had it we aired it it was actually uh wednesday night that he was able to join and we taped the interview but point being is he was he was talking about 15 zones. We're going to keep people where they won't be able to travel outside a radius of about 15 minutes of where they live to limit everybody's travel. And they're working on that in Canterbury and in Oxford,

Oxford County, which is where Oxford University is. They're dividing the city into six zones. Movement by car between the zones is restricted to 100 trips per year. And the comment here is, imagine if your power-mad politicians liked COVID lockdowns so much that they wanted to continue them indefinitely. This is part of the 15-minute city agenda. If residents want to leave the zone, they will need permission from the council who gets to decide who is worthy of freedom and who isn't.

Residents will be allowed to leave their zone a maximum of 100 days per year. Every resident will have to register their car. The council will then track their movements via smart cameras around the city. And all of that communism, as he points out, is going to make the weather better. That's what they tell you. So if you got multiple cars, they will link them together for a household. So, you know, you don't get any extra trips by having multiple cars. We can't have that happening. And so by limiting it to just moving into another section of the city, special permission, special tracking.

You can only do that 100 days per year. That means, on average, two days a week. So we're going to stop and we're going to connect to our guest. And when we come back, we're going to talk about this outrage that we just saw happening in New Zealand. Safe blood. How do we start to take back our own health care? It has all been stolen from us by the medical establishment, by the hospitals who put themselves in the center of this.

The hospitals, as we've seen for the last 1,002 days, have been completely bought out and bribed in all of this stuff. And they are the gatekeepers. We'll be right back. The Common Man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Pass to track and control us. Their commons project, to make sure the commoners own nothing.

And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you. This is The David Knight Show. All right, and joining us now is the man who has created safeblood.net. And I apologize, but I'm going to have to let him tell you his name because I have, on my paperless device here, lost my notes for the interview. So we're going to wing this here. I had some knockout questions I wanted to ask you. I'll just try to remember them as we go through this.

But thank you for joining us. And give everybody, the website is safeblood.net. Tell everybody your name and where they can find you on social media if you are on social media. Yes. So hello, David.

My name is George de la Pietra. I'm the founder of SafeBlood Donation and we have several websites. We have, for instance, safeblood.us for the Americans. That's the easiest one. We're on.net for other countries. We're in the meantime on more than 80 states worldwide,

and we usually have also the domain ending of the country. But.net, you'll find us. Of course, we're on social media, on Telegram and stuff. But you go to the website, and you'll find the links for everything. and stuff, but you go to the website and you find the links for everything. And I recall when I went to the website and looked, you had different things set up for, because I was on the English site, you had the, what I call the five I's, countries, the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand. And you click on that and it tells you what the status is in each one of the countries. So I'll let you tell people what is happening there. But let's begin with this outrageous case that the entire world has seen of this kidnapping of this young baby and taking away

the parental rights because they had the audacity to say that they wanted to have pure blood, safe blood for this child who has a heart issue. And there's no question about the mRNA and how it has issues with heart and with other things. And they absolutely refuse to allow them to have a choice with that. Tell us what is going on in New Zealand. I know that he's now had the operation and it has gone well, but the concerns were long term concerns about what the blood might be. Yes, and I mean the real horror is what happened behind.

I mean, imagine you're a parent. They take away your child. You don't agree to have this child operated and having a blood transfusion. What happens? The government takes you the rights away the guardianship is performing this surgery is using a blood pack with contaminated blood most likely and later you will get the guardianship back i mean this is like an attempt on the life of this poor baby i mean we hope and of course we pray everything goes fine you He will not have anything.

Like many people with the first shot, they are still okay. Second, third, fourth, it gets much worse. So let's pray for this baby. I'm very sorry about this baby because he, of course, this boy, he's in the media and he became the play ball of of the powerful it was clearly an example which was saturated because if it would have been just something they might have given in but it became a political question and they were the government was not able again to say no okay yeah maybe the blood could be contaminated of course not they they don't say it I mean everybody says no it's not because you cannot suddenly say we changed our minds you were right it will never happen they will find another excuse so the outcome unfortunately of

the New Zealand case is the worst possible the parents lost the child lost the whole law system lost there is no law anymore neither in New Zealand than anywhere else in the world from my point of view and I'm not even a lawyer but we have lawyers on our side at Safe Blood of course too we were involved we had video conferences about

the New Zealand case with all countries really from all countries they tried to help but I remember i was asked to join there and i said in the beginning it does not make it any better but i receive daily emails with similar cases really horrible cases and they all have lost in court all of them we had we had them in italy we had them in other countries. There is simply no law anymore. And I don't know what I would have done.

I would probably have escaped to a safe place. Well, we've had situations in the past where there have been parents who did not agree with cancer treatment, for example. They wanted to try a different type of treatment. And they took the kids away permanently from the kids, from the parents. Some cases they criminally prosecuted the parents. So we've seen this type of thing happening for a long time, but the medical martial law has really escalated with all this mRNA stuff. And this doctor who, you know, could have accommodated this request, I imagine he was concerned because the hospital would notice. And the hospitals seem to be the gatekeepers on all of this stuff for the big pharmaceutical companies now.

What is your take on the blood situation in general in the U.S. and other countries and Europe? Is there anywhere where people can get blood from, store up blood before they have an operation? Because I've heard of that type of thing happening in the U.S. Some people would say, well, I want to set aside my own blood for my own operation. I mean, is that allowed? I thought I had heard people talking about doing that. Is that allowed in the U.S. or other places? In the U.S. it is, actually.

Let's take the wider picture. If you look at the world, there are places like Africa, South America, the so-called poor countries. For them it's normal. If you go to a hospital in South America or in Africa, they even ask you to bring a blood donor with you because they don't have enough blood. So you can bring your brother in. You can give your own blood a hedge too, but you just usually bring one of your family. And that's the easiest way. There is no medical reason not to do it. They do it. And since COVID, unfortunately, before this was normal in Europe too, you could also store your own blood.

No problem. Now in Europe,. You could also store your own blood, no problem. Now, in Europe, no chance. Nowhere in Europe you can either store your own blood or bring your blood donor of your choice. In America, which is very funny, because we always think about, oh, Texas,

you know, they still can carry guns and everything. They are probably totally retarded. But no, they have very liberal laws in the States. In every state, there is no law which would forbid. Okay, worldwide, there is no law which forbids it, but it's handled in a way that we think it's forbidden. But in America, it's very liberal.

So you have not only the chance to go and donate your own blood and store it for yourself, you can choose a blood donor. If you go to a hospital and you say you have a surgery scheduled, they may not welcome you if you say, I want to bring my own blood donor, but they will let you do it. Even after COVID, they're still allowing that in the US? Even after COVID, yes.

That's the funny thing. I was not aware of this. We started in Europe's the funny thing i was not aware of this we started in europe with the whole thing then we moved to africa and things and always one eye to america but i thought it will be much worse than until i learned it's the opposite canada yes you are also now setting up canada and australia horrible there is chance. You have no chance in these two countries to find the blood donor of your choice and the hospital which will allow you to bring it in. So, but in the United States. That's interesting because, you know, we've had these situations in the past. They talk

about vampire therapy as kind of a label they put on it, but people could go to these health clinics. He had a lot of money. You could go there and you could get blood transfusions, um, and, um, supposedly young blood that is, uh, in better shape or,

you know, blood from a young person, donator, a donor or something like that, whether or not that stuff works or not, they, they say, well,

you know, it helps. So we use it for plastic surgery type of things. And we use it to help, uh, cognitive issues of people. if it's younger blood. That would be allowed, and I imagine that probably still is allowed in Europe because that's something that only the very wealthy people would do,

and they don't like to shut their options down. But now after COVID, they're shutting down people being able to choose their donors or even to be able to store their blood. That's pretty amazing, and we have to understand that that could come very quickly to the U.S. All it takes is some kind of a government statement from Medicare, Medicaid to the hospitals and say, this is going to be your new policy or else. And they've got the financial leverage over these hospitals to get them to do whatever they want. So we're only just one bureaucratic rule away

from this type of thing happening in the U.S., but it's good to know that's still happening here. However. Yes, go ahead, however. I don't believe it will happen, just to tell you this, because in America you have a different situation from other places. Let's say in most parts of the world, the blood donation and the whole blood management

is controlled by the Red Cross. It's more or less, it's not the state, but it's a non-profit society. Theoretically, it's controlled by the Red Cross. And in America, of course, too, they are involved, but you have lots and lots of privately owned laboratories where you since a long time you could go and all do these things with the blood because and every coin has two sides there's of course the bad side about it what you just said so the rich people just get any

blood if they pay for it well in europe it's forbidden to pay for blood. You cannot make money with it. So this is our concern a little bit in America. We're establishing it now, but we from SafeBlood of course want to make sure that not only rich people can afford it, so everybody must be able to afford unvaccinated blood. Yeah. No blood money, in other words. But yeah, I think that's the key thing. And all these other places, even though, as we've seen through COVID, the government can pull the financial strings on these hospitals to a great extent, still the fact that it is largely, it's not a government-run healthcare system like you have in all the other countries,

that allows for things to pop up here and there. It allows people to get outside of the system a little bit better. Let's talk a little bit about the blood supply. When did you begin doing this? Did you have concerns about the blood supply before the mRNA stuff, or is that really what brought this to a head?

Dr. Well, it started with this, but let me just add something else before. I mean, we had this before in the United States. I was, for instance, I was a naturopath in the 80s and 90s. I had my clinics. And I was working a lot based on the knowledge of Dr. Clark. Dr. Clark, she was a biologist. She had a clinic in the United States. She was forced to leave because she was working with electronic devices,

which went totally against medical knowledge. She finally then went and opened a clinic in Mexico. And if the states now start to be very restrictive, same thing will happen with the blood supply. We're just right now in the process of setting up Mexico. So then everybody will go to Mexico again. But okay. Yeah. And we've seen that with a lot of different alternative therapies. We've seen that with stem cells. People have to go to another country in order to get something because pharmaceutical industry has such a tight lock on the FDA. And they punish anybody who has any alternative to whatever the pharmaceutical companies want to do.

But yeah, tell us a little bit about what happens in the blood banks and that type of thing with the blood supply. Good. Theoretically, I told you I wanted to retire because I had my clinics and I did not really want to be in this business anymore. And then came COVID. And COVID, when I heard, okay, there is a pandemic coming and stuff. So I was looking at this. And in my clinics, I was specialized on virus, bacteria and vaccination damage. So bingo, it was exactly what my expertise was. And when I've seen COVID, I was very suspicious. And from day one on, I informed myself and I knew it's a hype. And then one year later, the vaccines were rolled out. And I did a lot of dark field microscopy in my clinics. And when I

have seen a picture of a dark field microscopy blocked from a vaccinated person, I was horrified. Yeah. And I've got a picture of that from your website. Let me put this up. Yeah. That's the one on the left there is Moderna vaccine and what it's done inside the blood with a dark field microscopy. Thank you. And then the one on the right is unvaccinated blood. Break that picture down.

What are we looking at there? We can see individual blood cells on the right-hand side, but they're all clumping together on the left side. Exactly. Ideally, this is watched on a video because the whole thing is moving.

And you see these blood cells are moving. They are having some patterns. And a healthy pattern is the one on the right side where it's spaced between the cells and everything is flowing in a nice thing. And on the left side, there are clumps, there are clusters which are similar. For instance,

when you have cancer patients or something like this. It looks a bit similar. But this one is even worse. I've never seen anything. So it's just an extremely unhealthy, pathologic condition. It's not a healthy person. Cancer patients look like that picture where it's all clumped together. That's interesting.

For instance, yeah. So it looked just, and I must say it again, I've never seen anything like this in my clinics before. So I was horrified and I did some research and I've seen that some scientists have done their homework and we had lots of videos from this. And then I knew I have to do immediately something, which because this means that the vaccines go into your body.

They are, of course, entering your bloodstream and they stay there. And when you need a blood transfusion, you get the vaccine more or less for free through the back door. And this is not what the now billions of people in the world which are not vaccinated yet, they don't want this. So I said, let's do something to prevent this from happening. I was just talking about Dr. McCullough.

Dr. Peter McCullough was saying, look, we're looking at this vaccine shedding and transmitting it through bodily fluids and things like that. And he said, it seems to be persistent. Both the mRNA as well as the spikes persist in the blood. And he goes, we're not seeing it as we go out, you know, 30 days, 90 days, whatever. He says, we keep going further and further out and looking at this and we don't see any

decline in what is happening. As a matter of fact, with the additional doses and the boosters and things like that, it continues to build and accumulate, but it doesn't decline. And so that's the really concerning thing that the blood is, is as people get more and more shots and boosters, it's getting worse. And, and that certainly can be transferred with a transfusion. Now, in the past, they would do filtering and things like that, right? But the filter is not going to take out these small particles, or will it? Unfortunately not.

I mean, we had a totally different vaccine kind of vaccines before. Before the so-called mRNA vaccines, which are very new, rolled out without a real 10-year clinical trial, how we normally would do it. We have a new situation, it's a new technique. And with this technique, which is a bit complicated to explain, but it's a technique which alters actually your DNA, which works on a totally different level. And this is already horrifying enough, but the major problem for me is, yes, there are all these particles in the blood, and it's very difficult to get them out. It's graphene oxide, it's spike proteins, but it's tons of inorganic, non-declared particles,

which nobody knows what it is so however this leads to the fact on one side that many people develop thrombosis and when you have a thrombosis in the leg it's not that bad but when you have it in the heart or in the brain we know what happens yes so this is already very dangerous but even worse and for me the worst at all is, like you said, you have one shot, maybe you're still okay, a second one, a third, your immune system totally breaks down. After four or five shots, you need a slight flu and you may die on it because the immune system is out of order. Let me ask you in the past when the Red Cross was getting donors and that type of thing, I mean, did they screen people and ask them, do you have hepatitis or some other things? Did they screen people for diseases before they would take their blood?

They still do it. This is the joke. I mean, they still screen you for HIV, for hepatitis B, for instance, which is, yeah, okay, I understand this in the 1890s, this was however, they cannot filter all these things out and they only find what they're looking for, like with all laboratory tests.

And they, of course, now we have the narrative which says these vaccines are not dangerous. I talked to the Red Cross at the very beginning, they said, our blood is safe. And if they say this, they cannot suddenly come and say, yes, of course, we test for. Whatever.

Yeah. Oh, we locked up there. Okay, we're back. They say safe. So why would they do this? Yeah, exactly. Yeah. You know what I think?

They cannot change the narrative suddenly. Yeah, I agree. Yeah, it froze there for a second, but you know what I think that I do is they ought to, um, uh, they have to look at, uh, the blood and give it a PCR test.

They're so manic about PCR testing. Everybody they've locked down these millions of tens of millions of people in these big cities in China, but they won't do a PCR test, you know, and, and give it a full 40 cycle threshold on there, you know, so you can multiply it by a

trillion look for any spikes how about that you know if they were to do that that would put an end to it uh just tell them hey we need to we're worried about covid uh so we need to get you to do some pcr testing of the blood they could actually invent a fake test or something because i mean there's nothing more fake than the PCR test for this purpose, of course, for the whole COVID, we know it. But even if they would say, so, yeah, let's make a PCR test or anything, they would already say that it's possible that something is not good with the blood of the vaccinated,

which means there's something not good with the vaccines. And this goes against the narrative i asked to be honest the the boss of the red cross in switzerland do you want to join us you want to become our partner he said no of course there's no needs to do it our blood is safe but then we exchanged emails and in the end after the he said, yeah, we could do this, but it would not really fit well to our position as a partner to the government with the vaccination program. So it's very clear where everything comes from. That's right. Yeah, it's kind of like what we see the ESG, environmental social governance, where if they do what the government wants, the government's got an agenda, a direction that it wants to go.

If you partner with them, if you push their narrative, whether or not it's true, then you will be rewarded. Otherwise, you will be purged and shut down. I mean, it's just a very simple process. And so I know they're not going to do it for that. Let's talk, though, a little bit about what your organization, safeblood.net, is about in terms of helping people, informing people, and where do you want to see this going in order to try to create a parallel situation to the established blood donations that we've got now? Yeah, this sounds a bit over. The thing is, I actually, I'm more more modest i would actually only

like to go back to the situation we had 10 years ago because 10 years ago you could choose your blood donor no problem and now suddenly you cannot do it anymore so my first goal is to bring awareness to the fact that we cannot do this anymore. I often give interviews and even the interviewer is surprised that we cannot do it because people think, of course, I can donate my own blood. They are surprised that this is not possible anymore suddenly. So raise awareness about this. However, in the States where we can do this, then there's one thing I want to make sure that there will be a blood supply, either by a direct donor. That's why we have a database where we bring donors and receivers together.

Our members are all part of a worldwide huge database. This is one thing to make sure there is a blood supply, which is not done, let's say, by private laboratories, which want to make a lot of tons of money and they sell then half of it to the black market or whatever at horrendous prices so that this will be somehow regulated this is one thing but for me even more important to be honest i don't want to be a blood dealer i want to raise awareness also of the fact that blood transfusions in general they are not non-problematic it's it's quite a thing i mean it's there are studies which say that blood transfusions do not even improve anything that the risk of lethality is with blood transfusions even worse than without

okay you have a study here another study that but I look at the whole picture, and what I totally agree is there is a situation where in a few cases you need a blood transfusion, otherwise you would die. Yeah, if you lost a lot of blood, you got to get it back somehow. Yes. However, if you, for instance, you have a surgery done in a hospital, you lose a lot of blood. And instead of taking a blood pack from the Red Cross, there is a technique.

It's called the auto transfusion, which collects your own blood, brings it back in the bloodstream, and you get your own blood back during the surgery. And this is something which all hospitals can do. They have the machine, but they don't do it. And so we have to force them a little bit. Like they're all in the narrative right now. And for instance, for this case, we have a living will, which our members have. And in the living will, it says, I do not agree to any transfusions before you tried everything else, which is the auto-transfusion. And if we can reduce transfusions with this by 80%,

then we have actually already more done than I was ever dreaming of. And the nice thing is we have lots of clinics now that agree to do this. And if you go there and you tell them, I want this, it's most likely that you don't need blood at all. Now, let me ask you about the autotransfusion because that's something I haven't heard of before. And so you said that that's pretty widely available. Does every hospital typically have some? Why wouldn't they do that rather than use some replacement blood from the Red Cross or Blood Bank or something like that? Do they not have the machines or they don't have

enough? They do have them in pretty much in all the hospitals? The answer is why would they not do it? It's the same answer. Why has there been a century pandemics? Why have there been vaccinations rolled out so quickly? There is no logic answer to this unless you think a bit among or behind all these pictures. So there is no medical answer to this. There's no need, maybe there is insurance because they are, if they have their blood pack, this is the procedure. But there are even more, there's more than one auto transfusion, there is the cold m80 which is with a machine most hospitals every decent hospital has it but people are trained to do

to use it and there are for for the simpler cases there are even auto transfusions without this machine it can be done too but it's like with the um autologous donation it's called when you donate your own blood ahead for a scheduled surgery for instance this used to be done in germany for instance forever because it makes sense there's no blood better for yourself than your own blood so as long as you can do with this ahead and suddenly they don't do it anymore and so i was talking to to chief doctors and asked what's wrong with it and then they just say we don't do this since a long time anymore but there's no reason given because there is no medical reason that's right not a medical so look for another one then well yeah exactly we've seen

this happening and it was you know a little over a year ago we saw for another one then. Yeah, exactly. We've seen this happening, and it was a little over a year ago that we saw the first one of these cases where they said, well, you need an organ donation, but we're not going to do that unless you are vaccinated. Everything is being subordinated to this obsession that they have with a vaccine. The first case that I was aware of, it happened in Colorado. They had a lady who needed a kidney transplant. She had a friend who was going to donate.

And they said, no, you can't because neither one of you are vaccinated. And she said, well, you know, but I've got a donor here. I'm not taking a kidney away from that. First, I said, well, you know, we need to make sure that you're going to survive. And you're not going to survive if you don't get the vaccine, that line. OK. And she said, well, yeah, but I'm not taking an organ from somebody else. This is a person who's going to donate to me individually. This is not, I'm not in line to

get an organ donation from a cadaver or something like that. And they said, no, no, because we want to only do these operations if somebody has got a chance of survival. But they wanted the donor to be vaccinated as well. I mean, none of it made any sense except for the political aspect of it, except for the financial pressures that were coming from the entire medical system. And so these types of things, forcing everybody to be vaccinated or you can't donate blood, removing, as you point out, everywhere, I guess, except for the United States, removing the idea that you can set aside your own blood or you can have other donors give you blood, removing that option, again, because of the vaccine. It's amazing how it has reset everything, isn't it?

I'm happy that you say it because I would put myself probably in danger if I said too much. But however, you said it, there is no medical reason to not do this. So there must be a greater plan behind everything. And unfortunately, that's what happens. Well, it is an educational issue. I think it's important people understand. I did not know before I talked to you that, uh, there is a capability. If you're having an operation, you're going to lose blood to recycle that blood back into the patient. Of course, you know, somebody's come

had an automobile accident or something like that. They've lost a lot of blood that's got to be replaced. But if it's, you know, the process like that, you have that option. People need to be educated about that. Talk a little bit about safeblood.net. Besides the educational issues, trying to get a critical mass of people, I guess we could say, that not only understand what's going on, but that may be able to work on structures that are parallel. You have that available at safeblood.net where people can sign up and once you get

to a certain level, perhaps there's something else that can be done. Talk a little bit about that. Yes, there are a couple of other similar organizations in the meantime set up and running, but they're all not ready yet. They don't have the database yet because we

have now a year experience and we collect we have a very nice website with the database which really works and it's also very safe we put a lot of effort in data security and stuff of course because you have to give us of course very sensitive medical data you have to give us, of course, very sensitive medical data. You have to prove us that you're a living person, that you're a real existing human being. So it's not that easy to enroll as a member, but once you're through it, you're in a community, which is, again, worldwide.

In the meantime, we have potential donors, potential receivers, everywhere in the world. So if you're from the States or from England, you travel to Africa, you still can get the same kind of service which you have at your home. And that just was the idea from the beginning, because it does not make sense if I do this only in Switzerland where we started. From the beginning, I said this needs to be worldwide because these 20, 30% of unvaccinated people, they want to stay like this. This is why they can enroll as a member.

They are part of the community. On our website, you can look directly for a donor. You put in your blood group and where you want to look for, and you see matches. And we then, of course, put you together with the matches you cannot contact each other for data protection reason yourself this is not our job and we do this already in america we cannot do it in europe yet because although we can do it but there's no point because there's no hospital who would allow you to use this blood. But in America, we're already doing it

because we have the database already. That's nice. And there's actually not much more to say. What is done, we are operating. You can look for a blood donor. What is not done yet, which theoretically is there, you can also look for a medical partner, for a hospital, which would welcome you.

Because theoretically, they're doing it all but if you go to any hospital they might say what you're one of these anti-vaxxers or something and now you don't do it so then you go to the next hospital and soon we will have a database also of the american clinics which you can look for you say where can i go where am I welcome and where am I not welcome but this is in the process of being set up well you know there's I've talked to several people who are setting up ways because the hospitals have gotten to be such gatekeepers with all of this stuff and taking away so much choice in medicine there's a lot of and we saw that with things like ivermectin and other things like that.

So that has given rise to organizations that are doing telemedicine, that are finding doctors and nurses and other medical professionals who have been purged out of the hospital system and they would like to still be able to practice. And so that type of parallel structure is starting to happen, and I imagine it would be a good mix for them to partner with you and start setting up some clinics as they're starting to, some of them, right now most of them are doing telemedicine. Some of them, though, are starting to try to get practitioners

in certain areas that they can recommend to you. So they might operate as like a GP. They might do triage and recommend you to somebody that they know, give you some medical advice, that type of thing. But they're working to have facilities, clinics where you can go. And so I would imagine that is really what, there's going to be a lot of demand for that as people look at that. So I think it's important for people to understand where this is.

And I'll just finish with a quote from your website. You say, I have eight children and six grandchildren, all of them in the best of health, thanks to an immune, an intact immune system. I would like to be able to look them in the eye in the future. And when they asked me one day, what did you actually do against this rising fascism and the criminal politicians back then? I can say, at least I tried.

That's the best that any of us can look at. Uh, thank you very much, Georgia. Appreciate it. And your last name is Pietra, I think, but the Della Petra,

okay. Uh, well, I'll, we'll go with your pronunciation. I know that mine is mangled, but the website that people can find information at is safe blood.net, right?

Yep. Okay. Thank you very much for joining us and thank you for what you're doing. We appreciate that. Thank you very much, David, for having me and all the best. Thank you.

Thank you. We'll be right back, folks. Stay with us. I love you. you're listening to the david knight show you know george told me he said uh i listened to some of what you were saying about what's going on in these uk cities oxford and canterbury and things like that he says it sounds like some kind of strange uh dystopian science fiction novel and that's what life has become isn't it and the key issue again goes back to

choice and speech and things like that and we have a supreme court case where there's some arguments that were heard it was kind of interesting to look at the comments from some of the supreme court justices nor neil gorsuch as well as the newest supreme court justice brown jackson and so gorsuch this is the case, by the way, where you have the woman who's a Christian making graphic and website design services, saying and being taken on by the dictators in Colorado who have come after the uh, the guy who has masterpiece, uh, cake shop or bakery or something like that.

You know, they came in and said, we want you to make a custom cake for us. And so you had him win at the Supreme court level. And, um, he goes back to Colorado because, uh,

they tried, they knew he was a Christian and, uh, you know, played Christian music there and all the rest of this stuff. So they decided that they would push his face into the cake and make him make a gay wedding cake for them. And he said, no, I'm not going to do it. And it's against my religious beliefs.

And many people point out, yeah, you want to go in and Nick Fuentes go in and make a Jewish deli, force them to make a Hitler cake for him or something like that. I mean, that's really what we're talking about. It's just to try to, oh, well, this is what you believe. I don't like that. And I'm going to punish you. I'm going to coerce you. And I'm going to use the Colorado Commission on Civil Rights to do it. How about that? And so when he goes back to Colorado after winning at the Supreme Court, fighting for years of that, another one of the LGBT come in and wants him to make a transversary cake. I've got the anniversary of my transition coming up, and I want you to make a cake celebrating that. So am I going to do it? So that started all over again. And then we've got a third case,

and this is about the website. And so Neil Gorsuch asked in his questioning of the Colorado government, this commission, whether or not Colorado baker Jack Phillips was forced to undergo re-education after he refused to bake a cake for a same-sex marriage wedding. It came during oral arguments, and he asked the attorney there, he said, the Colorado Solicitor General Eric Olson, he said, Mr. Phillips did go through a re-education program pursuant to Colorado law, did he not, Gorsuch asked. And the Colorado

attorney said, well, he went through a process that ensured that he was familiar with it. Gorsuch interrupted him and said, it was a re-education program, right? And he says, it was not a re-education program. And so Gorsuch says, what do you call it? He says, well, it was a process to make sure that he was familiar with Colorado law. Gorsuch said, some might be excused for calling that a reeducation program. And so again, he gets, after he goes back, evidently the reeducation did not work. So he gets the second lawsuit. The Colorado Supreme Court was hearing arguments in the Masterpiece Cake Shop in October. It heard those arguments again for a second time. It's not yet announced a decision.

And so in this particular case, which is about a woman who has websites, but she's not going to make custom websites for a same-sex marriage or something like that, anything that would go against her Christian beliefs. So that's what this case is about. And unfortunately, in both of these, well, there hasn't been an opinion on the second attack on the Masterpiece Bake Shop. But the first one was kind of narrow in the sense that it was about the artistic aspect of it. You know, the baker had said, look, I have a lot of stuff that's on the shelf and you can buy it, but I'm not going to custom make a cake that goes against my religious beliefs,

but I'll sell you anything here. I'm not asking anything about your sexual activities or beliefs or anything like that before I sell you a cookie or a cake off the shelf, but I'm not going to especially bake something. And so they made it about the artistic aspect of it. And so then when Katanji Brown Jackson gets her turn to question, she asks this question of the lawyer for the website designer. And she brings up It's a Wonderful Life. And she says, let's say that I want to do video depictions of It's a Wonderful Life. And I know that movie very well.

I want it to be authentic. And so only white children and families can be customers for that particular product. Now, this really doesn't make any sense. She's not talking about the making of the film, but she's talking about, well, nobody can buy this except white people. That doesn't have anything to do with the artistic aspects of that. If you wanted to make it authentic, make it look like the original movie in the 1940s, you would have a white cast of actors.

But it doesn't say anything about who could buy it. That doesn't make any sense. It's a real stretch to do that. She goes on to say, I'm expressing something, right? Well, no, you're not creating. You are reselling something that's already been done. So it is a non sequitur as far as I can see. I can say that anti-discrimination laws can't make me sell It's a Wonderful Life packages to non-white individuals. This is very troubling to see that this is the way her mind works, because there is no analogy to this. There's no creation involved here. You're simply reselling it.

And she doesn't understand this is not a case of racial discrimination. This is a case of the free exercise of religion. And yeah um, uh, yeah, I only want white people to be able to buy my version of the movie, just like the original. Um, none of this makes any sense. I will only sell to white individuals because I'm trying to depict it as an authentic depiction of that scene. As I understand it, she can't, she's confused about creation and about, uh, you and about the creative process and about reselling. She's confused about the difference between religious discrimination and coercing somebody to violate their religious beliefs and racism.

These are all different things. It's very disturbing to see how illogical her questioning is. She further invoked Christmas, citing a photographer who refused to photograph non-white children with Santa Claus. You see her obsession with race? Brown Jackson. She can't even question it about religious beliefs. It's all about race. There is no clause in the Constitution that talks about the free exercise of racism, although you would think it was there for the liberals.

They do it all the time. Anyway, she says, so you want to have this photographer. She said, 1950s Santa scenes. And they do it in sepia tone. And they're customizing each one of them. And it's not off the rack. They're bringing people and having them interact with Santa as children because they're trying to capture the feelings of a certain era. But precisely because they're trying to capture the feelings of a certain era, their policy

is that only white children can be photographed in this way because that's how they view the scenes with Santa that they are trying to depict. Again, this is not about race. And for her, everything is about race. And she seems to have an issue with the 1950s as well. I don't know what the deal is with her. As we look at this whole issue of where the lines are drawn and whether you are coercing somebody to perform something for you.

That's the other part of this, is the coercion that is involved. This is a story out of the Idaho Statesman. Meet the Idaho Christians pushing for for Greater LGBTQ Representation in Government. And so they do a story about a guy that they really like, who his name is Gail Somino. He, they said, is a conservative Christian gay man. There's something here that seems to be inconsistent here. He said that he had pleaded with his fellow Republicans to support same-sex marriage. there's something here that seems to be inconsistent here uh he said um that uh he

pleaded with his fellow republicans to support same-sex marriage he said opposing marriage equality cuts against conservative ideals of smaller government and in our bible lessons he said again i don't know what bible he's got he said, I was just one voice in a sea of silence. I had hoped that my speech would have been a spark of inspiration for others, that they would find the conviction to stand up and be more vocal on this. Well, they've got convictions. He just doesn't like their convictions. They have convictions that are not based on his speech,

but what they have followed in the Bible. And the Bible is not silent. It doesn't have a sea of silence. I don't know what, as a conservative, he's trying to conserve. Traditional marriage, as marriage has always been throughout the millennia, even in Greece, where homosexuality was widely practiced and accepted, even there they did not have homosexual marriage. They understood that the key purpose of marriage was to have children. So why does he call himself a Christian and reject Christ's definition of marriage?

Why does he call Christ Lord and not do what he has to say? They said the next legislative session, the Idaho statesman is very upset about this, is expected to consider a bill banning drag performances. No, they don't say that this is drag performances for kids, or if it's in general. I seriously doubt that it is going to ban drag performances in general. It's probably focused on the kids. Frankly, I don't care to police the activity of adults. I mean, you know,

you've got these drag things and burlesque things. That's been around for a long time in a lot of different ways. And I don't think anybody wants to get the government involved as a morality police. We're talking about this being done to children. We don't allow children into bars because of the alcohol. We don't allow them into topless bars or things like that because of the sexual stuff. So why would we do this with the drag queen stuff? Again, none of this makes any sense. It's like they worship anything that is being done to kids. You better get out of my way. I'm going to have my way with the kids. In the same way, we're talking about the vaccines.

You can't opt out of having blood that has been vaccinated because that would reflect poorly on the vaccine that we must worship. And it's the same thing with us. They're not going to tolerate choice. They're not going to tolerate somebody's religion. No, you will, we're not talking about tolerating something. We're talking about celebrating, and they demand that you celebrate what they do. So this guy says, well, you can, one person that they talked to, a Reverend Dr. Wettstein,

a retired pastor from an Episcopal church, said, well, you can find justification for just about anything in the Bible. And we support the LGBT. It's like, well, I think you can also find people who can find anything they want in the Constitution. They can twist the text to do anything they want. They can say, well, you know, we have this phrase there that says, you know, to promote the general welfare. Well, I think that any welfare program or anything like that, now that's the federal government's job. We've got to promote the general welfare. Or the Commerce Clause that was saying you're not going to set up internal barriers of trade passing from one state to the other. And then they use that to say, well, within a particular state, you're not going to be free to do certain things.

We're going to impose restrictions on what people can do. That's how they push the war on drugs. They say, well, we have the commerce clause and we will tell you what commerce you can engage in with everything. Well, that was always there. Nobody thought that that gave anybody the power to do drug prohibition. That's why they went through the cumbersome process of prohibiting alcohol by passing the 18th Amendment, because they knew that that was a false argument.

So yeah, you can twist the text in the Constitution. You can twist the text in the Constitution. You can twist the text in the Bible to get anything that you want. But the Idaho statesman is twisting all this to say that if anybody doesn't celebrate what they do, it is intolerance of the LGBT. What is driving this, they said. And so they talked to a bunch of politicians who wring their hands about how intolerant people who have different beliefs than they do are. No, they're the ones who are intolerant. They're the ones who are projecting. They're the ones who are demanding conformity, demanding celebration, demanding that you violate your religious beliefs. And this is happening in New Jersey as well with abortion.

You have New Jersey moving to mandate abortion in health insurance plans. Always we see from the Democrats, it is mandate, it is coerce, sue people with this stuff. But we are the ones who are intolerant, right? And quite frankly, when you talk about abortion, I think we should be intolerant of the murder of children, just like I think we should be intolerant of the sexualization and the grooming of children.

But they're not looking for middle ground on any issue, including our children, including aborting our children. They said, we believe in the universal right of all New Jerseyans to access abortion. But that's not what it's about. Because they want to coerce New Jerseyans to pay for a process that they believe is murder. That's not toleration. And that violates our universal rights. We will coerce you to pay for what you believe is murder. That's what the New Jersey government is saying.

One person pushing back on this, the SFL Action Group says, abortion-loving politicians love forcing death by abortion into health care. They're tone deaf to the conscience rights objections of many Americans, and they are prioritizing a misuse of funds. Thomas Jefferson, the thing that he was proudest of was his statute that would stop the establishment of, you know, statute for religious liberty in Virginia,

stop the coercion of people into government-established religions. And what do we mean by government-established religion? It has nothing to do with the exercise of religion, even by people who are working for the government. Because what he was talking about and what real establishment was, was to say that in some states you're required to attend a particular church and to financially support them. In some others, they did not require attendance,

but they required that you financially support them. And Jefferson said it is an abomination to force people to pay for something that they reject. And that is exactly what is happening here. That was the essence of why we had a separation from, why we separated the government from church and put a wall around the government, not around the church. And that was not in the Constitution, of course. That was just a letter of assurance from Jefferson

who said, I'm not anti-religion. As a matter of fact, I want a wall around the government to keep them in their place so they don't interfere with people's free exercise of religion. The spokesperson for SFL Action said corporate abortion, that's Planned Parenthood and many others as well, and their allies have moved from choice to coercion in these policies, trying to require participation in this.

And of course, we've seen that in everything they do. Whether we're talking about masks or jabs or schooling and homeschooling, even seatbelts, you will do what I say. I will decide. I will make the choices about your life, about your health, about your beliefs. We will be letting New Jersey voters know about this because if your quote-unquote health care kills people on purpose, you're doing it wrong. Well, I think we are doing it wrong. It is killing people left and right over one issue after the other. Before we run out of time here, I just want to talk a little bit about, you know, begin

with the second batch of Twitter stuff, looking at the shadow banning and all the many different ways they had to reduce your visibility. And there's an interesting question as to why Elon Musk actually picked up Twitter. What was the purpose behind all of it? There's an op-ed piece where he talked about it in the standpoint of a coffee shop. And he says, you know, Jack Dorsey has this very simple little coffee shop and it's working very well. But at some point, the government comes to him and says, oh, there's a, we need your help in Egypt. Uh, there's something that is going on there and it really would be helpful if you

could help us to shape a narrative there, uh, pushing back against the government. And so he said, um, this simple coffee shop, they all of a sudden they bring in a lot of equipment and other things to help him to get this information out. And pretty soon it just gets out of control. He doesn't know what's happening with this, right? They're bringing in more people. They're bringing in more equipment. And then the op-ed piece from Conservative Treehouse says, Elon Musk has no idea what he purchased with Jack's magic coffee shop.

But if he does understand what he's getting, it looks even worse. Outlook is even worse for us. He said, as it starts to grow, Jack and his magic coffee shop, where everything was free and you could do anything you wanted to, all of a sudden now it's getting gigantic,

and Jack is spending his time giving speeches and things like that, and he doesn't really know what is happening back at his little coffee shop. And it really has gotten out of control. Now, billionaire Elon Musk, he says, is a man intimately familiar with large industrial systems and with government, had been watching the disgruntled visitors to Jack's coffee shop who were no longer

even permitted to enter because of the people who had taken it over. And he says, to put it in bluntly honest terms, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is this operating system that is running in the background of Twitter. It's not just portals. This whole thing was designed and built from the very beginning, geospatial intelligence, manipulating in a very precise scientific way and being able to monitor whether or not your narrative and your propaganda is working. He goes,

you can debate whether or not Elon Musk honestly didn't know all of this before purchasing Twitter from his good friend, Jack Dorsey and or what the scenario of the owner operator motive actually is. You can decide all that stuff for yourself. But, um, he says, the larger objective of U.S. involvement

in social media, and I would say in the internet in general, has always been monitoring and surveillance of the public conversation, and then ultimately controlling and influencing public opinion. It is the deputized state. They have deputized these corporations.

They gave them money in the beginning of the practical aspect of the internet. And of course, Elon Musk is now making statements about how PayPal's fines against people at $2,500. He said, it looks like social credit system. I would never do that. He's looking to recreate PayPal. He's got big plans for this thing. Don't trust him.

But do have a good weekend. Thank you for listening. The Common Man The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated,

ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, and intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you.