The David Knight Show - 9Nov22 Midterm 2022: Was It Fake Polls, Stuffed Ballots or Something Else?
Episode Date: November 9, 2022OUTLINE of today's show with TIMECODESCNN exit polls painted a bleak picture for Democrats — so what happened?2:23Abortion was a big issue for Democrats. Why did Republicans run away from what's a... VERY VISCERAL issue in defense of life?8:34Why are the Republicans silent about the vaccines? About the climate? Why are they silent about all these issues?14:50A metric of corruption: look at the astronomical spending, dwarfing Presidential race of 22 years ago17:30Oz vs Fetterman — the bankruptcy of our political system.23:01Were the "red wave" polls wrong? Were they PUSH POLLS to build rage for a civil war? Was the election rigged?28:44You will now see "Stop the Steal" Part Deux, to grift supporters of money and recklessly push us toward civil war37:42How Steve Bannon and the grifters steer you away from the REAL issues. Wrong issues, wrong tactics. Here's what you SHOULD be focused on.41:44Biggest losers: False Trump prophets whose "thus saith the Lord" has been soundly exposed as a LIE50:31Trump says of the candidates he endorsed and sometimes created: "I think if they win, I should get all the credit. And if they lose, I should not be blamed at all"1:02:41Trump takes credit for DeSantis win: "My endorsements made Ron Desantis a success."1:06:19"Mafia Don" Trump threatens Ron DeSantis that he will leak things that won’t be very flattering to him if he runs for president.1:12:56DeSantis: "Freedom is here to stay in Florida." DeSantis credits FREEDOM, "Florida was a refuge of sanity when the world went mad"1:29:04DeSantis is not perfect and doesn't go all the way to stop the wrongs, but he's an example of what a governor can do if they have the will to do something.1:35:16COP27 climate change agenda in Egypt and John Kerry admits they're following the same plan they did with pandemic1:38:47The UN and Davos World Economic Forum partnership joins with multinational corporations who provide the money for the takeover, buying their stake in the new world order1:44:07Rishi Sunak embraces "climate justice" and "climate reparations". "Now is the time to double down on climate change rather than reversing course" as he pledges to lavishly give money away to foreign countries while his people can't afford to keep the heat or even the lights on.1:55:53Depopulation is always just beneath the surface of the agenda: "How will we answer when baby 8 billion is old enough to ask?"1:58:37Dem Senator Tester says he can't show any statistics to prove climate change, but he knows "from real life" that it's real. But don't worry, he not going to "turn off the spigot" just yet.2:02:35China EXCLUDED from the demand for "climate reparations", which includes taxes on fossil fuel companies2:10:49As Trump was cheering and pushing 5G, Palm Beach, Florida was exempted from 5G wireless law.2:18:38Listener comments on 5G towers and the passivity of the entire human population.2:25:23How technology and entertainment has taken us out of the real world.2:33:33Too Big to Fail or Jail banks are now giving LOWER INTEREST LOANS to corporations who discriminate — "workforce diversity".2:40:05One in four Americans can only afford to spend $100 on Thanksgiving or they’re skipping it altogether2:42:58If you can't stop friends and family from getting the jab — Moderna vaccine has a MUCH HIGHER rate of adverse effects than even the Pfizer vaccine.2:49:23Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly. Using free speech to free minds.
You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 9th of November, year of our Lord 2022,
day 972 of the emergency.
Today, we're going to take a look at the vanished red wave.
Was it ever there?
Did they lie to us about it being there?
Did they lie to us about the election results?
Either way, they're now pushing this frustration in order to push us into a civil war.
So we're going to take a look at the results, and we're going to take a look at what has been tipped as coming up.
This is always about Trump.
Who did he endorse? Did they win? Did they lose?
Now it's really going to be about Trump.
We're going into Trump overdrive.
And MAGA is going into overdrive of Trump derangement syndrome.
We'll be right back.
Stay with us. Well, it's kind of interesting because we've been looking at polls.
We've been looking at a rapidly escalating, we're right back now with the election,
to where we were being told the poll numbers were a couple of months ago,
maybe even just about a month or so, because this red wave thing just came up at the last minute.
And it was not just one or two polls.
It was a lot of different polls polls and they kept escalating it.
And so was this for real? Do you trust the polls? Do you trust the election results?
Let's take a look at some of the exit polls that happened yesterday on some of the issues.
And Information Liberation has a lot of screenshots from CNN talking about the exit polls.
This is early last night.
And they said, CNN exit polls paint a bleak picture for Democrats.
This is the take that CNN had at the time.
And so they asked people, how are you feeling about the way things are going in the U.S.?
And about 73% of the people were either dissatisfied or angry. As a matter of fact,
39% dissatisfied, 34% angry. Do you approve of Biden as president? 54% did not. And this is in
the CNN exit poll. These are people who went to vote. But 48% of them said that Biden was not a factor, even though, uh, the majority
46% said, um, that Biden's policies were hurting.
And I say majority because 36% said it was helping 16% said his policies made no difference.
And in terms of what the biggest concern was, inflation was by far and away what was most important to Republicans.
47% of Republicans said it was the number one issue.
Abortion was down at 11.
Abortion was the top issue for the Democrats.
Immigration and crime came in second and third, but immigration, crime, and abortion were way down.
They were 14%, 13%, and 11%.
47% was about inflation, but that was the Republicans.
Where were the Democrats?
Well, the Democrats ranked abortion far and away as their number one issue.
Remember, it was the Republicans who said that inflation, 47% of Republicans said inflation was the biggest issue. Remember, it was the Republicans who said that inflation, 47% of Republicans said
inflation was the biggest issue. 44% of Democrats said abortion was the biggest issue. And the
number two for them was tied between gun control and inflation. Now, when you look at the overall results, that's not by party,
and you ask people if they're suffering economically with gas prices, economically
with inflation, all the rest of this stuff. Oh yeah, yeah. Overwhelming majority say they are.
Overwhelming majority are concerned about the recession, about inflation, and all the rest of
this, but the Democrats cannot make the connection to reality.
They can't understand that it's inflation. They can't understand that it's the fuel and that the
fuel is fueling inflation and so many other things. It got kicked off with a lockdown, of course.
As I've said over and over again, it was Trump who started the dumpster fire with a Chinese style lockdown in the U.S., the globalist lockdown.
And then Biden came along and poured our fuel on it.
And so it is a big dumpster fire, but they don't understand.
And of course, they don't understand.
They don't understand the Inflation Reduction Act.
The Democrats are so clueless about economics, they think that the way you control inflation is to tax your enemies. You give money to your friends, and if you start to fuel inflation,
you take money from your enemies. That's the way this works. So 44% of them thought that abortion
was the key issue for them. And of those people who said, when they talked about abortion,
they said, and this is not just about Democrats, this is about people who said, when they talked about abortion, they said, and this is not just about
Democrats, this is about people in general, you had 60% of the people supported abortion.
30% said it should be legal in all cases. 30% said it should be legal in most cases. You see,
the GOP has run from this issue. That's why I played that very effective animated film about the abortion.
They call it The Procedure the other day. I said, what is the problem with Republicans?
That the Republican, quote unquote, leadership, the Republican politicians cannot take on this
life and death issue. There is nothing that should be more easily understood.
It's a very visceral issue.
I challenge anybody to look at the reality of that man's testimony of what he saw
and how it was illustrated in that animated clip.
That is how you convince people.
This is not something that is, well, here's how inflation works.
You see, if you do
this to the fuel and it goes up and then this happens and that happens, that becomes kind of
a technical intellectual argument. And I understand that a lot of people don't have the attention span
to deal with that. I had some guy told me because I criticized Alex Jones, some guy said,
you're the most boring person I've ever heard.
You're like a math teacher.
And I said, yeah, unfortunately, you can't understand why two plus two equals does not equal five.
Because you don't have the attention span.
Probably flunked out in math as well.
So you're not going to get people there by talking about economic issues, even though we need to understand that. And even though we should talk about it, the vast majority of people are going to be like that troll.
Don't know much about algebra. Don't know what a slide rule is for either. Do you? Uh, so, uh,
you're not going to get to them with that, but there is no more visceral issue than abortion. And we've allowed these people to
hypocritically seize this and say, this is oppression of women. This is about my body,
my choice. After what we've seen for the last two years, these people screaming at you about your
mask, screaming at you to get a vaccine, screaming at you to get out of their space. They don't care about your body.
They don't care about your choice in health care.
They don't care about a doctor-patient relationship.
And they certainly have no understanding of health care.
But they could understand if people would stand up and defend this.
But the Republicans ran like mad as soon as Dobbs happened.
A lot of these people who have now lost Blake Masters, Blake Masters, and a lot of these losing Republicans immediately went back and scrubbed their website.
Well, Blake, hasta la vista, baby.
You were useless anyway.
Who needs people like that?
They're not going to defend freedom.
They're placeholders.
They're there to make you feel good. They're there to put you to sleep like Trump. People like Blake
Masters were never going to do anything for you. They were puppets of people like Trump and Peter
Thiel, technocrats, globalists, good riddance. Don't worry about this.
We've got it.
That's not our path to victory.
Our path to victory does not go through Washington,
certainly doesn't go through the White House,
and it doesn't go through politics.
We have mighty weapons.
We have life and liberty on our side,
and we need to unashamedly stand for those things.
Who is on God's side?
That ought to be the question.
But you can tell who is not on God's side.
It's the people who are cowardly afraid to defend innocent life.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet
up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2pm 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18 plus gamblingcare.ie.
So go away.
You're useless.
So many of these people that Trump endorsed,
these celebrity candidates,
Carrie Lake, Dr. Oz, Herschel Walker,
they're useless to us, even if they win. They're about themselves. So, in terms of how they feel about Roe v. Wade being overturned, not only did you have 60% of the people say,
well, I think it ought to be legal in all or most cases. 30% said all cases. 30% said most cases.
But of that 60%, 39% of them were very angry.
Very angry.
They weren't just dissatisfied.
It broke two to one in terms of anger.
Again, you have to confront the issues.
And if these people can't confront the issues,
they don't belong in the arena.
They're useless to us in the arena.
They're spineless.
They're just there.
They take positions so they can get positions.
That's all it's about.
They want a position in Washington or in the Senate or whatever,
and they don't have policies, they don't have principles,
certainly don't have principles,
but they don't even have any policies that they'll stick to or defend.
They just have positions.
And as soon as they stick their wet finger in the air
and see which way the wind is blowing,
people like Blake Masters go back and suddenly change it.
And he's not the only one.
Talked about that months ago.
So, most important issue to your vote, 32% said inflation, 27% said abortion.
Crime was down at 12%.
Immigration was the bottom issue.
Not that it's not important.
But I think people have finally realized the fraud of the Republicans on bottom issue. Not that it's not important, but I think people have finally
realized the fraud of the Republicans on that issue. You're not going to do it. They're not
going to do anything. Biden's not going to do anything about it. So why even bother with it?
Why even talk about it? Nobody talks about it anymore except for Breitbart and Trump.
But not even Trump talks about it that much because he didn't do anything about it.
So the condition of the nation's economy.
You had 75% of the people said it was either not so good or poor.
And poor was the biggest response.
But again, they didn't vote their pocketbook.
Or we didn't get the, you know, they either rigged the election or they rigged the polls or people can't connect the dots or there may be another explanation.
And I'm going to give that to you as well for your consideration.
In the past year, has inflation caused your family?
20% said severe hardship.
58% said moderate hardship. That's 78% of the people
said inflation has made things rougher. But that's not their key issue.
The key issue for the Democrats is killing kids and mutilating kids. And the Republicans could not rise to the occasion.
Your family's financial situation compared to two years ago, 46% said worse.
35% said about the same.
Only 18% said better.
This is probably the people in Washington.
So have gas prices been a financial hardship recently?
61% said yes.
But again, we don't have any Republicans who will take this issue on.
I haven't noticed any Republicans taking on the climate lie.
I haven't noticed any of them taking on the green reset.
Haven't noticed any of them noticing that COP 27 is going on right now in Egypt.
And we'll talk about that later.
Haven't heard any of them complain about that.
Do you realize that this newly elected or I guess selected is a better way to put it.
Rishi Sunak in the UK is now talking
about climate reparations. And the Western countries, Europe and the US, have to cough up
trillions of dollars a year to fix our economies the way they demand. And then we have to give
away trillions of dollars a year,
according to the UN.
Why is that not an issue in this election?
Why are the Republicans silent about the vaccines, about the lockdowns, about the climate
MacGuffin?
Why are they silent about all these issues?
Why do they run from abortion as an issue?
On every important issue, they were AWOL.
And so they deserve to lose, and they did.
When you look at the exit polls, again, inflation was a top concern,
and that's from CBS.
I just gave you what CNN said.
CBS said in their poll, 32% said top issue was inflation. 27% said abortion. The numbers are slightly different, but the ranking
is pretty much the same as what CNN had. Why is that? Why is that? Because they're doing exit
polls and there's one organization that does exit polls.
They are used as a pool for everybody.
And so they'll break down, what's your most important issue?
What are your demographics?
What do you think about Biden?
Male, female, black, white.
Here's how people vote, but they don't give you the overall. Well, here's what everybody said, who they said they voted for,
according to the exit poll. And they do know that. That's one of the ways that they make
their earlier projections and predictions. But it's their projections based on exit polling
when they project winners. So they do know that information, but curiously, they don't tell you that. And they'll repeat it again. The state department looks at exit polling abroad and compares it
to the official results. And if it differs by more than 5%, the state department has historically
said, I think the election was not honest. And so they're very careful. I think it's probably a condition of being in that pool.
If you're CBS or CNN or Fox News or any of these big companies that participate in that exit polling pool,
you're free to report, I think, any of the demographic cross-tabulations,
but you're not allowed to give the bottom line because that would raise too many questions.
Oh, wait a minute.
You said candidate a one by 10%, but the exit polls show the other guy winning by 15%.
How did that happen?
Don't want to have that happen.
So I'm sure that's in their licensing agreement.
Look at the money.
Look at the money.
Show me the money, Jerry.
Yeah, the most expensive midterm races ever.
Now, they have a lot of these different races here.
The Ron Johnson race in Wisconsin.
The Ohio race between J.D. Vance and Tim Ryan.
The Arizona race between Blake Masters and Mark Kelly.
The Georgia race with Warnick and Walker.
The Pennsylvania race, of course, with Fetterman and Oz.
And the Arizona race between Masto and Laxalt.
Now, how much money was spent combined by both candidates?
They didn't break this down by Statistica by how much each,
how much did the Republicans each, how much did the
Republicans spend, how much did the Democrats spend, but they took a grand total of what was
spent. And this is a very, this is another interesting metric, just like what was the
grand total on your exit polls for candidate A versus candidate B, and how does that compare to
the overall reported results, the official
results?
This is another interesting metric.
This is a metric of corruption.
This is a metric of centralization.
This is, as H.L.
Mencken said, a metric that shows that an election is an advanced auction of stolen
goods.
To compare these numbers, I'll give you these numbers,
but the lowest one on here was $176 million,
and that was in the Nevada race between Masto and Laxalt.
176.
In the 2000 presidential race,
Bush had about $100 million was spent on his campaign by him and by outside sources.
Al Gore had about $70 million.
Al Gore whined about it and said he bought the election because it was outspent him by about 50%. But combined, the presidential election in 2000, $170 million.
Now, that is, you know, Wade, that is less than any of these races that I just gave you.
And there's six of them here.
And so the lowest one in Nevada, $176 million.
In Wisconsin, $193 million.
In Ohio, $197 million. 176 million in wisconsin 193 million in ohio 197 million in arizona 220 million
in georgia 255 million in pennsylvania 343 million
the presidential race 20 years ago, 22 years ago, 170 million.
And now we're spending in the Pennsylvania race.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to 10 euro
if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham
with live score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race
main market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ee, about twice that. Twice that.
This is how, and this is a metric of how centralized and corrupt our government has become.
Because people are rushing in to buy their way to access, to have money, to have access to markets, to be able to conduct business.
You know, if you don't pay the politicians off,
it's not just that you're not going to get a contract.
That's what this used to be about.
No, if you don't pay these people off,
your entire industry might be erased as non-essential
or erased as an existential threat to humanity.
That's what we've seen for the last 972 days.
You will just be removed.
So you've got to get the small businesses together.
And we've got to start bribing these candidates to get them to allow us to continue to have a business, right?
That's the way this works.
So just looking at some of these right now,
they have, um, still as of the time program started, they'd not decided about the Arizona
race between Hobbs and Cary Lake. Uh, it was still pretty close, but, um,
it was, uh, leaning towards the Democrat. Uh, it looks like looks like at the time we captured this,
it looks like Johnson is going to squeak it out in Wisconsin.
Johnson in Wisconsin.
How about that?
Even rhymes.
And again,
he was one of the only senators,
the only one actually,
not even Rand Paul as a doctor.
Defended people who had been injured by the vaccine,
let alone people who had been killed, the families of people who had been killed.
So he did a great job of standing against that.
But he did, I think, hurt himself with his base by going wobbly on homosexual marriage
and some other things like that.
But once that came up with the 10th Amendment issue in Dobbs,
he ran to the left on social issues.
It looks like Baldock in New Hampshire has lost in that as well.
As things are shaping up now,
what looked like was going to be a couple of senator uh, uh, Senator leads and, um, in the, in the U S Senate look like
it was going to be like 52 or 53 Republicans.
Uh, now that's not even sure it's coming down to four races that are very, very close and
have still not been decided yet.
And the margin in the house is, um, still looking like it's going to be a Republican, but not nearly
the kind of overwhelming Republican margin they were looking for.
One of the key things is, which is truly amazing, and the Pennsylvania race has really shown
the bankruptcy of our political system.
The fact that you would have to choose between a guy who is officially brain
dead and another guy who is a foreign citizen,
who is not even going to give up his citizenship unless and until he gets
elected.
And just before he gets sworn in a guy who was,
who never embraced any of the policies that conservatives say they embrace
has always been a Hollywood celebrity liberal, Dr. Oz,
who, as a matter of fact, was just like the guy who handpicked him and promoted him, Donald Trump.
Another person who never embraced Republican values, who is a rich celebrity.
And when you look at the picks of Trump,
these celebrity candidates,
Carrie Lake is not a conservative.
She is somebody who looked at Trump
and saw how effective he was at reinventing himself and realized that as a very effective speaker, she could do the same thing.
She used to support Obama.
She hung out with Obama.
All the people who knew her said she was a leftist, just like Trump hung out with the Clintons and Epstein and the rest of these people.
She reinvented herself.
She's a celebrity candidate.
I don't believe she's authentic whatsoever.
There's no big loss there.
So anyway, yeah, and adopted his combative style.
So the Democrats can keep the Senate if they win two of the remaining four toss-ups.
That's where we are right now.
And things are razor thin in Georgia.
Another celebrity candidate.
It'd be hard to imagine anybody worse than Walker,
unless you went to a guy, a Democrat, who'd had a stroke.
Fetterman.
But that's where we are.
And you want to talk about somebody being the hand-picked choice of Donald Trump, guy, a Democrat who'd had a stroke Fetterman. Uh, but that's where we are.
And you want to talk about somebody being the hand picked choice of Donald Trump.
Uh, he got Walker to move back to Georgia where he played college football
so that he could run for this seat.
He was coached and instructed by Trump because it doesn't matter whether he can defend himself, whether he has any integrity doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter to Donald Trump.
It doesn't matter to Donald Trump supporters.
It doesn't matter to Walker.
And it doesn't matter to the Walker supporters.
None of that stuff matters, right?
It doesn't matter what he believes, what he would do.
Hey, he's got an R behind his name and Trump supported him.
Now, the interesting thing is, even though he's hardly able to squeak this thing out in Georgia, the guy that was Trump's enemy in Georgia, Governor Kemp, beat Stacey Abrams.
You know, I talked about it the other day.
Stacey Abrams, one thing that did come true, people were saying, well, it looks like Stacey Abrams is going to lose.
It looks like Beto is going to lose.
And you had people on the left say,
why do we keep giving these same losers these high-profile positions
in these marquee races?
They keep losing.
And, of course, both of them did that again in this particular race.
So it looks like Dr. Oz will be able to keep his Turkish citizenship. So that's
the good news for him. He worked so hard to keep it. I mean, he even did a stint in the Turkish
military so he could keep his Turkish citizenship. So now he can keep it. And it looks like Blake
Masters will be writing some more books for Peter Thiel
because he'll have the time on his hand.
So these things are still developing, many of them.
One person who did pull it out was J.D. Vance.
Perhaps Trump going to a rally and instead of supporting J.D. Vance,
trashing him, perhaps that helped.
It's interesting that, uh, a lot of these, uh, Republicans who I don't like their positions, quite frankly, I don't like the wine I've complained
about him, uh, quite a bit, uh, D deba D wine was the guy who the Republican
governor of Ohio, the first one to come up with the idea of a vaccine lottery.
Well, it might not have been his idea.
It might've been Klaus Schwab's or Fauci's or whatever, but he was
the first one to implement it.
And, um, he was really bad on the Chinese lockdown and yet he won Kemp one.
These other people want, there seems to be a pattern here.
The people who put distance between themselves and Trump and how they did in the election.
So, again, things are still very, very close in many of these races,
and we don't know what is going to happen yet with the Senate.
But, you know, who cares?
The real issue is Trump.
Just like after the 2020 election and there was going to be a runoff in Georgia,
nobody wanted to do anything to stop the lockdown rules of election.
They were put in by Trump with a lockdown that he kept going,
with Fauci's lockdown, with Davos' lockdown that Trump gave us,
the Chinese lockdown.
No, no, we're not going to change anything.
And that is the issue.
All these people who whine and complain, well,
I don't know that I trust this election. We've got too many mail-in votes and all the rest of
stuff. Well, stop it then. Anybody want to talk about stopping it? No. They'll whine and they'll
complain about it. Why? Because they want to push us into a civil war. That's why they don't fix any
of this. When it comes to governor, I certainly was disappointed to see Whitmer get reelected.
But Tudor Dixon did not really make this about freedom.
The only thing that she complained about with Whitmer's lockdown was the fact that we couldn't get our kids into these horrific schools as much.
Took a very, very soft position on that.
So when you look across the board, Scott Jensen in Minnesota, he was the physician who, he
was also a state representative, I think he was a state senator not sure but um he was a physician and a politician
and he was one of the early earliest pushbacks against this lockdown stuff and the pseudoscience
that was being pushed by fauci and the chinese and the world health organization cdc uh and um CDC. Uh, and, um, he, uh, lost in his race there in Minnesota.
Uh, Zeldin lost to Hochul of all things.
Yeah.
So, um, it is a disappointing to see Mike DeWine won easily.
Uh, just, just amazing.
He won easily.
Um, Doug Mastriano in Pennsylvania lost to that.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10
if your horse loses on a selected race.
That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing.
Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet.
This is total betting.
Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March.
Bet within 48 hours of race.
Main market excluding specials and place bets.
Terms apply.
Bet responsibly.
18plusgamblingcare.ie
Authoritarian tyrant Shapiro that I played the clip the other day.
Oh, these people want to talk about freedom?
Well, let's talk about my body, my choice, and all the rest of this stuff.
Had no answer to that. Um, in terms now, Doug Mastriano, uh,
did talk a lot. I think about, um, um, uh,
about, uh, pro-life issues. However,
you really poisoned the well by bringing in that false prophet, Julie green.
We'll talk more about that in a minute here. In Tennessee, you had a 32-point
lead by the governor who ran for re-election,
Governor Lee. No Trump involvement here.
Just able to run on his own because it's a heavily Republican state
and had what I see as one of the, if not
the biggest margin of victory in any state.
Because he's able to do it on his own.
Greg Abbott handily beating Beto, the Beto male, in the election yet again.
Hopefully we won't see any more of that guy.
But maybe he can get a Hollywood contract.
They love him. But the real concern is how this is being pushed by the, uh, the conservative media.
And I said before, they had set this thing up so that, uh, whatever happened, uh, people
were not going to believe it.
They're going to fight in the streets and that type of, that's what they're trying to
push us toward. And I think that all this poll lead up, either they did a poll lead up to build up expectations
and or some people would be disappointed and won a civil war or they rigged the election
because we've left in this, the election machines, we've left in the election machines,
we've left in the vote-by-mail stuff,
and we haven't fixed any of that.
So perhaps before we consider a civil war,
maybe there's some other things that we should do.
We'll talk about that when we come back from the break.
Before we go to the break,
I just want to thank a couple of people
who have left tips and comments on rock
fan. Uh, Mark, thank you very much. He says, uh, uh, Dave, I just looked at my county's election
report. The GOP won handily yesterday while the mail ballots helped to push the Dems over the top
and all but one or two local races. If you like, I can email you a link to the report. Uh, yeah.
You know, the thing is the vote-mail stuff and the election machines have
to be stopped. If you're just going to whine about it, you might as well shut up if you're not going
to do anything about it. It's like the border. If you're not going to do anything about it,
if you're just going to use this to build frustration and chaos, I would rather these
people just shut up about it if they're not going to fix it.
This vote by mail thing.
And again, that is, I had some listener contact me and said, I'm disabled.
I've always done absentee voting.
And, and, you know, don't agree with your criticism of it.
I'm not talking about that.
I'm talking about what was instituted by Trump during the Chinese lockdown.
Where you had a mail out election, a mailing out of ballots to people, people receiving ballots from multiple jurisdictions in some cases, people receiving ballots when they didn't ask for them, extending the election time and everything.
But primarily, the mailing out of these ballots, that has to be stopped. You need to have voting on one day.
And if somebody is going to have some issue,
if they're sick or something, they can do absentee ballots.
We've always done that.
That has a handshaking process that is very different from what was instituted in 2020 during the Trump China lockdown.
Dread Matt, thank you for the tip.
Keep crushing.
Politics are all corrupted.
Plant a garden.
Go hunting.
Yep.
Build stuff.
Move forward.
You need to prep your skills as well as your pantry.
That's right.
These grapplers do not control us, and we must not let them have the control.
So, yes.
But we'll talk about how this thing is coming up.
We need to know what the opposition is.
We need to know what their plans are.
We need to know how they're moving against us.
But they're not our friends.
They're not our saviors.
They're not going to be there for us.
Finally, Brian Pitts, thank you for the tip.
I appreciate that.
And he says, good morning, Mr. Knight.
How much extra do we have to pay for coffee mugs to be made in the USA?
I would really rather support local and pay more than buy from our adversary at a cheaper cost.
We'll see if we can find some.
So people have a choice with it.
We were trying to find things that were, well, this is this mug, uh, and I've got coffee in it cause I use it.
Uh, this is by Koozie. So we're looking for some name brands. Unfortunately, a lot of the name
brands have gone abroad, uh, with that. And the other one we picked because we, we liked the, um,
the metallic handle and the other stuff on it, but we'll take a look as, uh, for made in America
to get people an option for that as well. Uh, pretty much impossible to find some of these products made domestically, unfortunately, anymore.
But we'll look and we'll see so we can give people that option.
By the way, the coin is Made in America, the challenge coin.
Jason did a great job of finding those people.
And it's a family company. And they did a great job of finding those people and it's a family company
and they did a fantastic job with that.
We're going to take a look.
At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham
just as much as we love football.
The excitement, the roar,
and the chance to reward you.
That's why every day of the festival,
we're giving new members money back
as a free sports bet up to 10 euro
if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing cheltenham with live
score bet this is total betting sign up by 2 p.m 14th of march bet within 48 hours of race main
market excluding specials and place bets terms apply bet responsibly 18 plus gambling care.ie
quick break and we'll be right back. Stay with us.
The common man.
They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated,
ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknightshow.com Well, let's take a look at the pushing of the Civil War.
And this stuff started rolling out even before the election last night.
Outlet after outlet questioning the possibility of a Democrat victory.
And if that happens, then we need to be pushed into a war.
This is from the new Republic, which is a left, uh, leftist publication.
So they're very upset about the fact that Tucker Carlson was questioning this.
Tucker Carlson said, bottom line, Democrats absolutely cannot lose tomorrow's election,
he said on Monday night. So with that in mind, they're already preparing the rest of us
for election theft, which if you don't want a civil war, you shouldn't complain about it.
Fox News also slammed White House spokesperson Corrine Jean-Pierre for saying that it could take a few days to count all the votes.
Conservative think tank fellow was on Fox News saying,
this is not how it's supposed to work.
But the New Republic says, well, that's exactly how it's supposed to work. But the new Republic says,
well,
that's exactly how it's supposed to work.
No,
it's not.
That is not how it's supposed to work.
And as I've been saying for several days,
uh,
throughout my lifetime,
they had a few mechanical machines in the big cities,
which people did not trust.
And people talked about that and,
and how that was a source of corruption, a lack of transparency and audit and the rest of
that stuff.
And they had hand-counted ballots.
And we got the results right away.
Somehow we got the results right away.
How could that be?
And people had more trust in the election.
Why is it that it has to take so long to get these results?
After we've got computers.
Why are computers slower than hand counts?
Ask yourself that.
It doesn't have to do with more people voting.
You have more people counting.
It's just that simple.
And not only that, but why don't the Republicans do something about it?
That's the key issue.
The issue.
No, it's about transparency.
It's about the ability to audit.
We have no transparency.
We have no ability to audit.
That more than the amount of time that it takes to count, which is an absurdity.
That it should be a longer process when
you've got computers involved.
But all this stuff is really about transparency and audit.
That's why people don't trust the results more so than the timeframe.
Steve Bannon says a new Republic, former advisor to Trump, uh, accused
Democrats are trying to steal the election.
This has now become a business model for these grifters.
They're going to push us every single election.
People on the left, people on the right are going to push us to civil war
so these SOBs can make money.
These people like Bannon and Alex Jones and Roger Stone and Donald Trump.
I'm sick and tired of that.
They played you two years ago, and they're getting ready to do it again.
And every time they push us further and further into division and into civil war,
Steve Bannon knows about the fourth turning.
He knows what is the general zeitgeist of what is happening in
the public he doesn't care if he can make money he's a grifting convict he's been convicted of
grifting he didn't have any convictions like you and i talk about he's got the legal so we went one time we were when
we're doing our adoption of my daughter the we had a the lawyer who looked at
the paperwork and and said why did you get out of the video business we so we
did it because of convictions and didn't, didn't even think about it.
You know,
she comes back and she says,
I need to have details about those,
the nature of those convictions.
What were they for?
No,
no,
you don't understand.
But what are you talking about?
Steve Bannon?
That is the nature of his convictions.
The only convictions you'll find are in his rap sheet.
So,
uh,
he's out there pushing this.
He says, um, well, uh, legitimate, certifiable chain of custody votes count, okay?
No, that's not the issue, Steve.
You missed the issue, didn't you?
Because it's your buddy, your pal, your idol, Donald Trump,
who put in place the vote by mail, Chinese style, lockdown elections.
That's the problem.
That's what needs to be fixed.
You're not focusing people on the real problem.
So what are they not talking about in this election?
These people, you know, Steve Bannon, they're not talking about defending liberty.
They're not talking about ending the medical martial law
or ending Trump's executive order for an emergency. They're not talking about climate and depopulation
versus having fuel and food. They're not talking about that. They're not talking about the green
reset. They're not talking about the financial reset coming with the CBDCs.
They're not talking about the reset
that's coming with war.
They're not talking about anything.
They don't want to talk about war versus peace.
They don't want to talk about, you know,
fuel and food on the one hand
versus this climate killer agenda,
depopulation agenda.
They don't want to stop and take on the vaccine company.
They don't want to talk about any of that stuff.
And when it comes to the election, they're not talking about the paper ballots.
They're not talking about limiting the window of the election,
about having real voter ID.
They want your ID to travel.
They want your ID to get out of your house.
They want to know if you've had a vaccine.
They want an ID that is going to track every single financial purchase that you make, but
they won't defend voter ID and get that passed.
You smell a rat with that?
They don't want to have auditing of these elections.
They don't want to have transparency of the elections.
They don't want to have real ballot access and access to debates.
They don't want honest elections.
Neither side wants an honest election.
The whole thing is rigged.
Don't let them push you again like they did two years ago i opposed that on air when
alex jones was doing that's why he fired me he told everybody well i had to let him go for the
money yeah right the guy the guy who made tens of like 30 something million dollars this time
came out in the trial when they got the records under discovery and some of the records that he didn't mean for them to discover
he had a record year he made record profits pushing the chinese lockdown on you and telling
you it was necessary because they had engineered a virus in wuhan and that trump was going to you
know protect us he wouldn't do anything that wasn't necessary.
He made record profits.
And they said, well, I had to get rid of him.
And he was telling the truth because if he had left me there,
I was going to continue to push back. I called it a grift to his face on his shoddy lying media thing to, to, you know, info wars.
I called it out there and I would have caught, continued to call it out.
Social media everywhere as loudly as I could.
And I'm calling it out now.
That's what these people are ramping up to do again.
Don't get fooled again.
Go back and listen to the who, you know, the parting on the left is now parting on the right.
They want you in the streets with a shotgun singing the song.
That's what they want.
And they're going to grift you seven ways to Sunday.
They're going to fleece you just as badly as Davos.
When you look at what is happening, we don't want civil war.
These people never talk about nullification, for example.
They never talk about the Tenth Amendment.
They're afraid of that type.
They don't want any real solutions.
They don't talk about the real problems.
They don't talk about liberty versus medical martial law, the climate reset, the financial reset, none of that stuff.
They don't talk about any of that stuff. So you got the Trump lawyer, Christina Bob, priming voters to reject the election results.
She says, well, there should absolutely be no result later than the middle of the night, early Wednesday morning.
I think those areas that don't have result, it's going to look very suspicious.
You know what looks suspicious, Trumpet? It looks suspicious that your guy and your people don't come out against the real problem,
which is the Chinese lockdown election. That's why things are taking longer. That's why we can't
trust them, and we've lost a lot more transparency, but you don't come out against that. Instead, what you do is you encourage everybody to work from home, to vote from home.
And then when everything goes to hell in a handbasket, you say, well, you should have had
those results in already. What's the matter with you? You don't have those results? You've got half the people in some of these places voting by mail.
Voting by mail.
Under Pennsylvania state law, poll workers can't even start counting votes
until the morning of election day.
So they can collect these Trump mail-in, mail-out ballots, but they can't start counting them until election day.
Because always in the past, it was a small number of absentee voters from people who were disabled or sick,
going to be out of the country or whatever.
As writer James Sirowiecki pointed out, the Republican state legislatures will not allow early votes to be counted
or even pre-canvassed before then.
Well, this was never an issue before the Trump lockdown elections.
And then to all of that dumpster fire, you put in, you add to this, these Trump false prophets.
People like Julie Greene, and I played this earlier, but she's far from the only one, unfortunately.
My children, many warnings I have given to you, but there is coming a day that it will be too late.
So listen to these words and listen to my prophets.
Dare to believe me.
Yeah, thus saith the Lord.
More than religion.
More than the news stations. More than the news stations more than the
governments more than the bible listen to me she says look this false prophet this is the thing
as far as i'm concerned this is one of the worst aspects of this trump maga cult of what has
happened to our country and that is this reproach to the name of Christ. These phony false prophet Christians.
As I called it, the GOPP.
The gospel of prosperity and politics.
These pseudo false prophets out there.
Now, Julie didn't have a good day yesterday.
You think the pollsters got it bad while the Trump false prophets got it really, really bad.
And I want to call this out because these people are not Christians.
They're not representing God.
When they say, thus saith the Lord, they got to get it a hundred percent right or they're done.
You know, close only counts in horseshoes and nuclear weapons.
Doesn't count in prophecy.
You get it right a hundred percent of the time or you're done.
Why are these people still listening to them?
And as a matter of fact, I pointed this out about Doug Mastriano.
You know, he did not do, um, he kind of did a grassroots campaign, which is good.
Didn't hear too much about him.
But at these grassroots campaigns, he surrounded himself with these false prophets.
I'm glad he lost, quite frankly.
He may be a Christian in terms of his values.
He may have taken a very strong point on some of these issues, maybe stronger than some of the other candidates.
But that is the cockroach in the loaf of bread.
People like Julie Green.
And if he's going to embrace and elevate that, that is something that is a far greater issue than any of these politics.
Yes.
Here's what God says about false prophets you're out of here take them outside
of the camp here's some of the things that green has said of course i'll just remind you again
she said that god had quote chosen trump to be his quote moses to quote deliver the people out
of the hands of these nowadays pharaohs. She said that the majority of states
would decertify the 2020 election results. That didn't happen. Didn't happen, Julie. You're
finished. That Trump would take back his rightful place of power in 2020. That God would send his
angel of death to take the lives of people who stole the 2020 election, along with other
things that people did that she didn't like.
And she said, as she was brought in, rally after rally after rally with Doug Mastriano,
Doug Mastriano, I have you here for such a time as this, saith the Lord. I know it seems like I had forsaken you,
all your hard work and all the time you put to get to the truth in the elections.
You know, when we stand before God, did you know that when we stand before God,
the question he's going to ask us, what did you do to keep Donald Trump president?
Oh, well, if that's what he, if that's what God is really
going to ask, I'm in big trouble. I don't think that's what it's about. I don't think that's what
God is concerned about. And I don't think we need to be concerned about Donald Trump staying in the
presidency. And I think we do need to be concerned about these false prophets who are holding Christ
up to be ridiculed. That's what I'm concerned about. That's what bothers me. She said, for
example, Brian Kemp, who just got reelected by a big margin down in Georgia, she said,
my people caught you in the act, Governor Kemp.
I have warned you.
Again, not Julie.
This is God warning him.
You stood alongside the red dragon thinking that you would be safe.
You are not. I have everything and all who are with me, uppercase me, because, you know, she's speaking
on behalf of God.
Everything they need to try you for treason.
Your life, as you know it, Brian Kemp, is over.
He just got reelected to another term, Julie.
Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.
I will expose you and everything you did that night of the 2020 election.
I will expose you and your partner in crime, Jocelyn Benson. You will both take a fall from power and be tried for treason.
Gretchen Whitmer just got reelected, Julie.
Jerry Nadler is about to lose his life for the blood that drips from his hands.
Anybody can take a look at Jerry Landler and tell you that he's circling the drain physically.
I,
this is not much of a prediction,
uh,
but it still hasn't come true.
Two years later,
Susan Collins,
the angel of death is about to visit your house.
Yeah. Okay. Okay. Yeah, okay, okay.
You get the idea.
Mitch McConnell, everybody.
She's got a word from God for everybody.
All right, so Pennsylvania, there were issues, certainly.
Pennsylvania ran out of ballots in a county that was something that would tip towards Trump.
A judge at Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas signed an order shortly after 1 p.m.
extending the voting time by two hours beyond the statutory close of polls at 8 p.m.
The northeastern Pennsylvania county had that extended after it suffered a shortage of
paper ballots. Paper ballots. Even paper ballots can get in the way, but if you have people running
the election that don't do their job. Dominion voting machines stopped working in New Jersey
county and other places as well. Let's just stop them from working altogether.
Let's not complain about it.
Let's not push this into a civil war.
We know what is necessary.
The U.S. military knows what's necessary.
Again, in the election in Iraq, they held it on one day.
People showed up.
They voted.
They got their thumb painted purple.
It's just that simple.
We'll be right back.
Has your news been censored, banned, censored, banned over and over again?
Has vital information been held prisoner by mainstream and anti-social media?
It's the duty of every thinking person
to make the great escape to thedavidknightshow.com.
There you'll find links to live streams,
videos, audio podcasts, and support links.
Live stream the show at DLive and TREP
every Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. Eastern.
Videos at Bitchute and Ugetube.
New audio podcast, The Real David Knight Show,
at Podbean, iTunes, Stitcher, iHeart, and more.
But even though there's a light at the end of the tunnel,
without your support, the show will run out of gas.
The links to support the show are at TheDavidKnightShow.com to donate via Subscribestar, donate via P***, or donate via P*** Cash App, Bitcoin, or P.O. Box.
Our sincere thanks to all of you who have stood with us to get this far.
Please don't forget to share the links and pray for the country as well as our family.
All right.
And I want to get a couple of comments here.
And can you pull those up there?
Yeah, thank you.
Audi MRR.
Thank you for the tip.
It says, hi, David.
I own a web radio station, Modern Retro Radio.
Now, that's MRR.
Just wanted to say that ordinary working class gays are not in favor of this sick grooming LGBT agenda.
That's right.
As a matter of fact, I've played a lot of those clips.
Some drag queens are not in favor of this stuff.
You don't understand how highly sexualized this is.
Well, yes, we do.
We understand this is a yes we do we understand
this is a stripper joint type of thing what is amazing to me for years in the movie business
it was a standard practice for hollywood to throw in a gratuitous uh strip joint scene so they could
get an r rating oh we gotta have let's have some nudity. Uh, so, you know,
we, we don't have that in the script. Okay. Okay. Put in, uh, the characters that go meet in a,
in a stripper bar. Okay. Put it politely. Uh, and so that got them their R rating.
Yeah. Yeah. Go see this movie. It's got some flesh in it. Right. Uh, and, and that's now what they're doing to the kids. They know exactly what they're doing. They know how sexualized this isn't. I
played the conservative drag queen many times. You know, it's not only that it's also drugs and
all the rest of this stuff that's there. You know, why are we sexualizing the kids? Uh, there was a
lesbian who I played the clip. She said, uh, I would have never,
I regret that I ever did anything with the LGBT. I was trying to defend my rights. She said to
Mary, but I never thought that this would be used to come after kids. And I regret that I ever had
anything to do with it. So a lot of them are sick about this stuff, sick about this.
And so the predator class is hijacking the gay rights issue to justify grooming kids.
It's disgusting.
It absolutely is.
And, you know, even the best of the Republicans like DeSantis takes it in measured steps.
It's a limited hangout. You know, to push, to come after these young kids,
he understands the
visceral
optics
of that. He says, well, you're not going to do
that with kids third grade and
under. Well, what about
the other minors all the way up to 18?
You're going to allow them to be gaslighted
and to have
off-label drugs given to them, prescribed to them, to mess up their body, in many cases permanently, to mutilate them surgically.
You know, you talk about all this stuff about ivermectin, HCQ.
Remember how upset they were about that?
These were drugs.
They knew what the safety profile was of them.
They'd been used for decades, 50, 60 years for other conditions.
They just said, hey, we noticed that this drug that's been used for this other condition
for decades seems to really help with this infection.
No, you can't use that.
We haven't approved it for that.
They've always allowed off-label use.
And so it was the odd thing that they would block ivermectin and HCQ for their off-label use.
When you had something they were trying to tell everybody was so dangerous, so novel, so unique,
that we had to do things that we have never, ever done before in civilization.
Lock everybody down, force everybody to take a vaccine that's not been tested.
But you can't have a drug that's been tested and used for 60 years.
That was unusual. Then they whip it back the other direction and of course oh yeah you want to use hormone blockers
and other things like that on kids no problem yeah yeah we've used this for you know castrating
rapists in prison but um you know we can use it for transitioning a young boy.
A minor.
Mark says, our right now legislature in Pennsylvania passed the law enabling mail ballots.
Yes, exactly.
Those Republicans have no problem with that.
Republicans kept silent with most of this medical martial law.
They, you know, jump in on this mail ballot stuff.
That's why I say, if you're going to support mail ballots,
if you're not going to oppose them categorically,
just shut up about Dominion.
I mean, look at what a limited hangout that is.
They swallow whole the mail ballot stuff, and they even say,
well, yeah, we need to have electronic voting machines, just not Dominion.
Almost support, almost support Dominion suing people like that.
I mean, that's total deception.
Harps, thank you very much.
Harps is in Australia.
Thank you for the tip. He says, I'm an anarchist, but I joined a political party against my beliefs just so they had the numbers to register and get rid of dictator Dan Andrews.
I quit the next day after the election.
Well, good for you.
And we need to look at, you know, look,
take some pragmatic positions on some of this stuff.
You know, we understand that they have no principles.
So sometimes we have to do some of the pragmatic things and,
and just do it temporarily like that.
Uh,
Vince Agnelli.
Hey,
it's good to see you on there.
Um,
I'm gonna talk for a while.
Check out my free version of the public wheel and you,
yes,
we talked about that in the past.
Uh,
Virginia did in 2019,
right in front of the plan.
Demick,
uh,
David interviewed me on it,
put in front of AJ,
and AJ got visibly angry on air.
Virginia made it three days post-election to count ballots.
Yeah, the interview is still out there, but AJ's reaction is not.
We'll see what happens with that, with banned video.
Who knows?
Let's talk a little bit about what's going on now.
Everybody gets to pivot and be 100% Trump.
Trump, Trump, Trump all the time.
And now Trump is back to where he was two years ago
where he can build up his persona,
build up his bank account
by telling people this election was stolen.
You need me back, right?
It's now giving him the justification to make a comeback financially, politically.
Trump already abandons the losers even before this happened.
He said, I should not be blamed.
As a matter of fact, Trump goes there when nobody else does,
and then he gets away with it.
He doesn't get laughed off of the stage.
Here's what he had to say.
You've endorsed more than 330 candidates this election cycle.
Tonight, win or lose, the results for Republicans,
how much of that will be because of Donald Trump?
Well, I think if they win, I should get all the credit.
And if they lose, I should not be blamed at all.
OK, but it'll probably be just the opposite when they win.
I think they're going to do very well.
I'll probably be given very little credit, even though in many cases I told people to run and they ran and they turned out to be very good candidates.
You know, they've turned out to be very good candidates.
But usually what would happen is when they do well, I won't be given
any credit. And if they do badly, they will blame everything on me. So I'm prepared for anything,
but we'll defend ourselves. You didn't misspeak. You pointed that out twice,
just so that you understand that, you know, as they say,
success has many fathers, but failure is an an orphan that's especially true when you're talking
about as ty cobb described trump a deeply wounded narcissist who is incapable of acting except out
of his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge out of So, yeah, he's just like the false prophets that hang around him, isn't he?
Pay no attention when I get it wrong.
But look at all of the things I said that was right.
That's what Alex does as well.
You know, pay no attention to the fact that he told everybody that Julian Assange is going to get pardoned right up to the 11th hour by Donald Trump.
Pay no attention to all of the rest of the prognoses that he had there.
He had told people many times, you know, Trump is going to announce his candidacy such and
such a specific day.
I know, I know.
None of that stuff happened either.
Those types of things don't really matter.
But, you know, the real thing that matters is that Alex was telling everybody what was going to happen in 2020, 20 years ago.
And the point is that he knew it.
And the point is that he downplayed it and went along with the panic to make money.
And he makes money by supporting Trump.
Now he's going to notice that things are getting dodgy for Trump.
Alex is smart enough, and a lot of these people are smart enough to understand,
that Trump's brand has been tarnished.
But if this election re-energizes Donald Trump,
if he becomes a saint and a martyr because of the political actions of these prosecutors in New York and Washington,
and he starts to come up again.
You'll see Alex and the rest of them groveling before him all the time.
But they understand that Trump has been a drag on the Republican Party
throughout this election.
He would go around, he would do his events,
and he would trash the candidates that he
came to.
He would be little them.
He did it to JD Vance.
He did it to everybody.
And just most recently, as I played last week, he goes to Pennsylvania as they're
doing the final bit and polls are saying that, uh, his candidate, uh, Oz and
Mastriano for Senate and for governor, doing well.
And so as he do, he goes there and he trash talks other Republicans and talks himself up for 2024.
It is not anything that is really helping us.
My endorsements made Ron DeSantis, as a matter of fact, he had more to say in that interview with News Nation
that you saw a little bit there,
said my endorsements made Ron DeSantis.
He wants to take credit for Ron DeSantis' success.
But it's actually just the opposite.
Ron DeSantis nearly lost when he got Trump's endorsement.
He did much, much better when Trump opposed him.
He won by 20 points.
When they were talking about this election last night, they said, well, this is just...
Florida came in fairly early,
and they said, looks like a red wave.
Rubio won easily.
DeSantis is winning easily. As a matter of fact now the question is is he going to have a bigger margin than jeb bush jeb bush
won by 12 points this ron desantis could win by 15 that's what they were saying last night
uh last i checked got up this morning and it was over 19%, nearly 20%. Not 20%, but 20 points that he beat Crist by.
And that was with all the trash talk from Trump.
And I think because of the trash talk from Trump, distancing himself from Trump.
And he didn't distance himself.
Trump distanced himself from DeSantis.
I think that worked out to DeSantis' advantage.
Anyway, he says, DeSantis could have been more gracious, he said.
As soon as I endorsed him, within moments, the race was over, said Trump.
I got him the nomination.
He didn't get it.
I got it.
Because the minute I made that endorsement, he got
it. Trump stands alone in a field of narcissist, doesn't he? I mean, have you ever seen anybody
stand out in a crowd of politicians who are all narcissists? Have you ever seen anybody stand out
in that crowd more so than Trump?
He didn't get that.
I got it for him.
The minute I endorsed him, he got it.
Uh, he said, then he ran and he wasn't supposed to be able to win.
Referencing the governor's race against Democrat Andrew Gillum, who, um, not long after that
was found, passed out, uh, drugged in a hotel room as part of a homosexual orgy.
That was the candidate he was running against DeSantis.
Uh, he said, I did two rallies and we had 52,000 people, each one.
And he won.
I thought he could have been more gracious, but that's up to him.
Says Trump.
Nobody ever accused Trump of being gracious about anything.
Well, he says, I think if they win, I should get all the credit.
And if they lose, I should not be blamed at all.
But it'll probably be just the opposite.
You can't do a parody of this guy. I used to watch, and I watched it just for the Trump parodies, really.
It was these people, radical left-wing communists
that do spitting image in the UK.
As a matter of fact, the only political figure
that they refused to lampoon
in terms of appearance or action or anything,
they refused to lampoon president xi of china
that's how marxist these people are spinning image but boy they did a funny job with uh trump and uh
with boris johnson as well and um it's just too easy to do trump as a parody and boris johnson
as well boris johnson's like a Bojo, the clown.
Uh, but usually he says Trump is he's going on.
Usually what would happen is, uh, when the candidates do well, I
won't be given any credit and if they do badly, they will blame everything on me.
So I'm prepared for anything, but we'll defend ourselves.
No, but he means when he says we and ourselves, this is the Royal we,
but I will defend myself.
That's what he's saying.
And I will promote myself endlessly.
He says, I'm going to be making a very big announcement on Tuesday, November the 15th,
Mar-a-Lago.
And so everybody knows that's when he's going to announce that he's going to be running
for office.
He announced that he's voting for DeSanctimonious,
as he called Ron DeSantis last week.
That's nothing unusual.
Most people in Florida evidently did.
And he said last night, as things were ramping up,
certainly Trump believed the polls.
He didn't believe that they were push polls
to try to push people into civil war.
He says, I think we're going to have a great night.
I think it's going to be great to the country.
Well, that's not exactly what happened.
And again, I think more than anybody else, he's to blame.
The people who were his handpicked candidates, the people that he was, he gave
this, this was Republicans election to lose.
When you look at Biden, when you look at Fetterman, seriously, you couldn't come up with a warm
body to beat these people.
Why couldn't you?
Because there were spineless cowards who didn't stand for
anything, especially not for our freedom and independence, Trump fired an opening
salvo against DeSantis on Saturday night, calling him Ron de sanctimonious,
but it doesn't stop with that.
Um, and when he said that Rod Dreher said, what an idiot he said, uh, DeSantis
is far more of an effective leader than Trump was.
And that is if you expect a leader to get something done rather than just talk about it and owning the libs.
Because he doesn't own people.
He just criticizes those.
So we see again the candidates that he did not endorse seem to do the best.
Uh, there's a couple of exceptions to that.
JD Vance one in spite of Trump's support, but of course, uh, Trump mocked him.
Maybe that helped JD a little bit.
Uh, so again, it was landslide for, uh, DeSantis, um, winning by nearly 20 points.
And so with all of that, Trump's puts out another warning to DeSantis.
Uh, he warns that he will leak things that won't be very flattering to DeSantis.
If he runs for president.
So the question is, did Rhonda Santas wake up this morning with a horse head in his bed or something?
From the mafia Don Trump, because he's getting threats from this mafia Don.
He says, I would tell you things about him that won't be very flattering. I know more about him than anybody other than perhaps his wife.
Yeah, he threatens Ron DeSantis.
Just like he mocked and threatened other people, other Republicans.
He is not a friend of the Republican Party.
It's amazing to me to see people who are Republicans embracing this guy.
Just like it's amazing to me to see people who are Christians embracing this guy.
There's nothing at all Christian about him.
How many wives have you had?
How many times have you hung out with Jeffrey Epstein?
Donnie?
All the pictures of you and Melania with Epstein?
You know, there was an interesting clip that went viral yesterday or the day before, uh, somebody engaged,
uh,
Clinton and asked him about his relationship with Epstein.
Yeah.
He just looks up and grins like, yeah, okay.
What a sleazy.
Anyway.
Yeah.
You know, I don't know.
What is this stuff that's so bad?
Did Ron DeSantis go on the plane with you, Donald?
With Epstein?
Was it like a threesome or something with you and, uh, Clinton and DeSantis?
What is it that you've got on this guy?
I mean, we've all seen your dirty laundry out in public.
I haven't seen anything anywhere close to that on DeSantis.
Maybe it's there.
I don't know.
Uh, but it is pretty clear the involvement of Trump and Clinton.
So Trump has his lawyer also issuing a warning to DeSantis.
The lawyer is not putting out some kind of a blackmail type of threat like Donald Trump is.
Hey, I know information about you and I'm going to tell people if you run.
And he says it publicly.
Unbelievable.
He is absolutely unfit for office from a moral standpoint.
He is unfit for office if you look at the four years, what he did not accomplish, and then what he did do in terms of the China lockdown and the father of the vaccine.
Just amazing to me that anybody doesn't, I mean, he ought to be locked up for what he did as president, not for the rest of the stuff that they're coming after him.
They've come after him for all kinds of phony trumped up charges.
But for what he did to us in 2020, he ought to be locked up for that, what he did with the vaccine.
So the Trump lawyer issues a stern warning.
Who was that?
Was that Tom Hayden?
And he'd go in and say, yeah, I've got some of my
friends here who would like to have a starring role in your administration. Some of our celebrity
politicians who didn't win, we're going to bring them back. He goes, oh, what was happening? Is
that what his lawyer did? And then, you know, is he going to, if he turns him away, is he going to
get the horse head in the bed? No, it was Lena Haba issued a stern warning to governor DeSantis Monday night at the former president's rally in Dayton.
And again, this type of stuff only helps DeSantis.
Uh, DeSantis is DeSantis because of Trump.
She said, well, no DeSantis barely won when he first ran.
But he blew it out more than anybody else other than, I guess,
maybe any of the other Republicans who we're looking at,
except for the Tennessee governor here.
But he blew it out of the water because of what he did.
Not because he got an endorsement from Trump,
but because he opposed Trump's vaccine.
Not as much as he should have, for sure.
But he did more to oppose it than any other governor did.
And he has the bragging rights to talk about that.
And that's one of the reasons why he is upheld.
Yeah, the elections, Donald Trump and MAGA people,
they're about more than one night. It's about the four years that you were in office. What you did to us
and what you did not do for us. DeSantis is
on the wrong side of some issues, for sure. He's on the wrong side
of free speech, for example. If you remember a few years ago, he criminalized
criticizing a foreign
government israel right said well we'll make it so that you can't do that he has um stood up for
freedom of speech for social media but really only for politicians not being censored so he takes
these measured approaches uh he pushes back and his um uh his um surgeon general pushed back on vaccines for kids.
They don't need them.
They're dangerous.
They have risk.
You shouldn't get them.
But if you want to get them, you can get them.
We're not going to stop you from it.
It's killing people, but we're not going to stop that.
Really?
Is that what government is supposed to do?
If you had the same number of kids who were crippled for life,
same number of kids who were killed because of some baby crib, you wouldn't step in as governor and stop the sale of that crib in Florida?
How dare you?
Let this continue.
So I'm not a big DeSantis supporter.
I'm not going to wet my finger and stick it in the air like Alex Jones and say, oh, yeah, look, I'm going to be all about DeSantis. It was just a couple of months ago that Alex Jones was mocking DeSantis as that fat boy
from Yale, this globalist.
And now he's all about DeSantis because it's just whatever makes him money, whatever the
crowd, the audience wants to hear.
He reads the room and he tells the room what they want to hear.
So DeSantis has been wrong on a lot of issues.
He's been a limited hangout in terms of the jabs, even in terms of the trans stuff.
As I said, you know, well, you're going to stop it for the kids that are in third grade and under,
but you're not going to do anything about it for the other minors all the way up to 18.
But unfortunately, that is far more, far more than any other GOP have done far
more and way more than Trump and so if the GOP when you look at how popular
DeSantis was for doing limited defense of the rule of law limited defense of
children limited defense against the vaccine
and the toxic poison, the depopulation agenda.
If you look at just his limited hangout, can you imagine if the Republicans
had really stood up for Liberty?
Tudor Dixon, very smart, very articulate.
I played that clip for you after the debate.
She did much better after the debate with a bunch of press hanging around her,
hitting her from one angle after the other,
hitting her with another question.
And rapid fire, answering their questions,
shutting down their criticisms.
The problem is that she wouldn't really take on
one of the worst queens of the lockdown, Whitmer, on the issue. She soft-pedaled it.
Well, you know, you look, our kids are a little bit behind. And look, you know,
General Motors is setting up some factories in Tennessee and other places because our taxes are
so high here. What about the barbers and other people that were completely put out of business there
because of Whitmer?
What about what is happening to the kids in school when they come back?
You won't take on the fundamental issues.
You beat about it around the bush.
So with a limited hangout, that's what we wind up getting it could have been a real
red wave if it had been a wave of liberty and so in typical trump fashion he calls nancy pelosi an
animal he says biden is cognitively impaired but we got a very big announcement on November the 15th. Again, all he is, is the, every time I see Trump, I'm reminded of, it's not one of my favorite movies.
I don't know why I keep going back to this thing, but, uh, you remember, um, was it hard
days night? I'm not even sure. It was one of these beetle movies. Um, they did when I was a kid,
black and white, and they go on a trip and he's got this grumpy old uncle.
And all he does is criticize people, call people names.
He tries to get them fighting with each other.
He's always mixing people up into a fight.
I tell you, there's nobody that I've ever seen in real life
that is more like that fictional character than Donald Trump.
He's constantly there to create chaos and fighting.
He hires the worst of Goldman Sachs, the worst of the military industrial complex.
He leaves them in there and then eventually, for petty personal reasons, he will fire them
and then criticize them as if they're the worst people in the world.
All it does is just make him look like an idiot for hiring him in the first place.
Everybody knew what they were.
And then his followers who follow him from place to place,
these camp followers of his.
As I say camp followers, it reminds me of the phrase hooker.
You know where that comes from?
The General Hooker, civil war general, who, um, unlike many of the other generals
did not run off the prostitutes who followed the union army under his command.
He was fine with it.
And so it'd be, it was, I guess you could say he embraced it to some degree or the other.
Don't know about it personally, but anyway.
And so that gave rise, it became such a big entourage following around Hooker's army that that is now what we call prostitutes.
And so that is really what MAGA has become.
It's become a bunch of prostitute camp followers.
Anything, anywhere Trump goes.
Uh, they follow him just like those guys that are living out of, you know, out of a car
and taking showers because they got a membership in some, uh, workout club that is natural,
uh, national.
Uh, but this is, uh, something that was on Fox news last night.
And this was a Brett bear was talking about, look at this, you know,
Fetterman, who can't even talk in complete sentences, has
no idea what he's saying. And he
beat Dr. Oz. Would it have made a difference
if the debate had been, well, let's say September 30th instead of
October 25th, after a lot of people
had already voted and then he got this reply from uh mark tyson who was uh and mark tyson is a gop
establishment he was a speechwriter for w okay uh he's not our friend but i think he understands what's going on in terms of, you know, you look at this, there's no way that you can avoid the fact that this was an 1990s, the worst border crisis in U.S. history. We have Joe Biden,
who is the least popular president since Harry Truman, since presidential polling happened,
and there wasn't a red wave. That is a searing indictment of the Republican Party.
That is a searing indictment of the message that we have been sending to the voters.
They looked at all of that and said, and looked at the Republican alternative and said, no, thanks. That is a real, the Republican Party needs to do a really deep introspection look in
the mirror right now, because this is an absolute disaster for the Republican Party and we need
to turn back.
We need to start, we need to look at who won today.
Ron DeSantis, DeWine, these governors.
Kemp.
Kemp. Abbott. Abbott, you know, look at these governors.
This is the path to the future.
And electing these radical candidates who ran far behind them has put the Republican Party in a terrible position.
And voters have indicted the Republican Party.
Well, you know, the radical candidates that this Bush speechwriter
is talking about were people who oppose things like DeWine's vaccine lottery or people who
opposed things like Greg Abbott's continuing state of emergency. You know, Greg Abbott played it very
cleverly in 2020. First, he locked everybody down. Then he realized he got some pushback from people
with churches.
So he says, all right, well, make an exception for the churches and masks and some of this other stuff.
And then as this thing drug on and on and on, he said, all right, and we're not going to require a mail-in election.
You can go to the election polls without a mask.
And we did.
We did go and vote without a mask. And we did, we did go and vote without a mask.
And boy,
I tell you,
it was,
um,
it made us feel very unwelcome.
And,
um,
and I made them feel very paranoid,
you know,
just do a little cough once in a while.
There,
you don't just,
uh,
you know,
I don't need to,
but,
um,
the,
uh,
but they had to let us vote.
So they have all these,
you know, sanitation rituals that make no difference, but they had to let us vote. So they have all these, you know, sanitation rituals that make no difference.
But they had to let us vote.
So he opened up the churches.
He opened up the polling places.
Why?
Because he's not an idiot.
But he is a traitor.
You know, Greg Abbott has extended, and he just extended it a couple of times this year already,
the executive order state of emergency about COVID.
He's a traitor.
DeWine is a traitor.
DeSantis did some of these things, but ultimately, you know, he's a limited hangout on this stuff
as well.
The problem is these people who went into opposition didn't go hard enough.
As I always say, you have to, if you're going to attack the king or in this
particular case, the globalist or the establishment, you got to go all in.
Half measures aren't going to work.
You can't backpedal on your defense of life.
You can't backpedal on your defense of liberty and the constitution.
If you do, you're done.
You go all in or you shut up and stay home.
And that's the real problem.
They didn't want to go all in. They just wanted and stay home. And that's the real problem.
They didn't want to go all in.
They just wanted, but they did want to have Trump.
Come on, bring your crowd, Trump.
Get them to support me.
And I think what they realize is you listen to his litany of these people who won re-election. Most of them establishment Republicans who Trump had nothing to do with.
People don't like the establishment Republican agenda,
but they don't like Trump either.
That's my takeaway.
That's my opinion.
That's how I see this happening.
So it takes us again to DeSantis.
And listen to the speech that he gave.
Whether you agree with him or not,
whether you think he's genuine or not,
he understands what people want.
He understands that it is liberty and freedom.
And this is his victory speech.
We've seen major challenges for the people of our state,
for the citizens of the United States,
and above all, for the cause of freedom.
We saw freedom in our very way of life.
And so many other jurisdictions in this country wither on the vine.
Florida held the line.
See, he made it about freedom.
People want freedom.
It's a winning issue.
Trump is not.
We chose education
over indoctrination. The sign even says freedom lives here. We chose law and order over rioting
and disorder. Florida was a refuge of sanity when the world went mad. We stood as a citadel of freedom for people across this country and indeed across the
world.
We faced attacks.
We took the hits.
We weathered the storms.
But we stood our ground.
We did not back down.
We had the conviction to guide us and we had the courage
to lead. We those promises.
And so today, after four years, the people have delivered their verdict.
Freedom is here to stay. How many times have you heard freedom news like this?
Thank you.
Now, thanks to the overwhelming support of the people of Florida,
we not only won election, we have rewritten the political map.
Thank you for honoring us with a win for the ages.
Yeah, big margin.
Big margin, especially for Florida.
Florida, which has typically been seen, and when I was growing up, it was always a Democrat state.
The Democrats then, though, were more conservative than the Republicans are
today.
But yeah,
the Democrats have just gone full on Marxists and the Republicans are to the
left of the Democrats when I was a kid.
But it's always been kind of a,
you know,
purple state going one way or the other solid red.
And it's because they made it about freedom.
Again,
how many times did you hear freedom use there?
You typically don't hear politicians talk about freedom anymore,
do you?
And yet he was standing there in a podium that has a map of Florida says
freedom lives here.
He says,
we were a citadel of freedom,
a refuge of sanity.
When the world went mad.
He's talking about you, Trump and Fauci.
He's talking about you, dictator Dan in Australia, Justin Trudeau, Boris Johnson, the whole lot of you.
The world went crazy.
The world went Chinese.
Chinese communist.
That's why YouTube kicked me off when when i said uh the 2020 the year
the world became china it went crazy it went marxist so he says uh we became a citadel of
freedom people across this country and around the world just a little bit of pushback against this
stuff and the key thing is is that he didn't cower down and say, well, there's nothing I can
do.
He came up with some approaches to, for even if he didn't go a hundred percent on, he said,
well, if we're going to do this, uh, this is, um, you know, I've got a tactic for how
we're going to stop the CDC from acquiring vaccines on cruise ships and that type of thing.
And he fought them on lawsuits and he fought them on this and he fought them on that.
And he came up with a lot of different ways.
He came up with, he withheld money from schools that were trying to stay closed or force masks
or force vaccines on kids and that type of thing.
And he said, well, you do these types of things and we'll withhold your money, which is exactly what you would expect.
That's what I said.
You know, Biden knows, Obama knows, if he wants to push boys and girls showers and gyms, what he does is he takes the money away from the people who don't do that.
Ron DeSantis had a policy about the schools and about the COVID rules.
And he says, if you don't do it my way, I'm going to take away your state money.
And even more, I might give you some fines with this stuff.
What did Trump do?
It didn't matter what Whitmer did or what Cuomo or Newsom did.
No matter what they did, no matter how bad it was, he kept the money flowing.
And I'm telling you that when you do that, you know, the buck stops with you.
A buck stops with the president.
And if the president keeps the bucks flowing, it's because he agrees with the policy.
Trump agreed with the lockdown.
He agreed with what Whitmer was doing.
He agreed with Newsom on the lockdown.
He kept the money flowing to them in unprecedented
amounts to them individually. It was discretionary money that was being used by these governors,
both Republican and Democrat. Brad Little in Idaho. Many times the state, the entire state
budget was given to him as discretionary spending to spend how he wished, as long as he kept the lockdown going, which he did.
Like some kind of a colonial governor, he disbanded the legislature
and then brought them back to rubber stamp a law that he had written.
That's a Republican governor, and that was a Republican legislature
that kowtowed to that tyrant, that imperial tyrant.
So he says we made promises, and we delivered on those promises, and that's true.
You know, I would like to have seen DeSantis go much further with this stuff.
But he delivered on what he wanted to do.
He knew how to get done what he wanted to do, and he focused on freedom.
So after four years, the people have delivered their verdict.
Freedom is here to stay, he said.
And as part of this election, you see an example of what somebody can do as a governor
if they have the will to do something.
You had the Department of Justice decide they were going to send election monitors to
florida for this election that happened yesterday and the state of florida said um no no we're not
going to let you in here you have that's not permitted under florida law go away you see he's
not afraid to oppose these people and he knows how to do these people. And he knows how to do it intelligently.
And he knows how to get it done.
He opposed the Department of Justice and sent them packing.
The Florida Department of State is rejecting the Department of Justice plan
to send federal election monitors to certain counties across the state.
And the letter that they sent back to the Department of Justice and made public,
Florida said, earlier today, the Florida Department of State received copies of your letters
to Miami-Dade and Broward counties, in which you seem to indicate
that the Department of Justice will send monitors inside polling places in these counties.
We also understand that you sent a similar letter to Palm Beach County.
But the Department of Justice monitors are not permitted under Florida law, says the letter.
And it goes on to describe who may enter any polling room or polling place.
Noting, so we got a list of people who
can go into the polling rooms and polling places under Florida law.
And guess what?
Your name ain't on the list.
It doesn't say anything here about Department of Justice officials.
So you're not on the list.
Go away.
So as your letters simply provide a non-exhaustive list of federal election statutes as the basis for this action without pointing to any specific statutory authorization.
Accordingly, the Florida Department of State invokes its authority under the Florida statutes to send its own monitors to the three targeted jurisdictions.
End of story. monitors to the three targeted jurisdictions. And a story you say is that kind of decisive action, whether or not you
agree with what he's doing, uh, that he is able to get this agenda through.
And again, I would like to see him go further on these issues, but
he made freedom the center point.
And it is why he won with such a large margin.
All right, we're going to take a quick break.
When we come back, we're going to talk about some of the,
what is happening with the climate agenda in Egypt.
We have a COP 27 is going on.
As a matter of fact, I have an interview tomorrow.
We'll have a live interview with Alex Newman from Egypt.
He's there for The New American covering this stuff live,
and he understands this.
He's been on it for a long time.
And so I'm looking forward to that interview tomorrow
because I'm going to tell you some of the things that are happening already.
You won't believe it.
Stay with us.
We've got a lot of news coming up.
But when we come back, we're going to talk about
what is going on with the climate agenda.
Big developments also in pharmaceuticals, but we're going to talk about the climate agenda first Thank you. you're listening to the dav Knight Show. Yeah, you know, I'll say this about Descendants.
What he has done after this Chinese lockdown reminds me of,
I keep going back to this NASCAR thing that we saw happen.
This guy gets right up against the wall.
Look at how fast he's going compared to the rest of the cars.
It looks like they sped the tape up.
That's just one of the craziest things I've ever seen.
And, you know, who would have thought that that would work?
I think what's going on there is that he can just floor it and not have to worry about traction, right?
And so that's what I think the wall effect is about.
I've looked at that and it's like, wow.
But you have to try something that's completely different every the wall effect is about. I've looked at that and it's like, wow.
But you have to try something that's completely different every once in a while, right?
And so that was kind of the wall effect for DeSantis, this whole Trump lockdown and great reset.
But we should not be afraid to try something different. And some of the people who had tried this, uh, on video games, uh, that could work.
Uh, but, um, you know, don't have to worry about, uh, losing traction and going sideways on thing if we're writing the wall, but you gotta be careful because if you hit a spot
on the wall, they could bounce you out and turn you sideways anyway.
Right.
So there's a risk involved with nobody had ever done that before.
They done it a couple of times in video games. I got kicked out of the video games because they did it. Sometimes they did it in
the video games and it didn't work. This guy had the guts to put his life on the line and try that
in real time and got some amazing results. And I think that is a great metaphor for what DeSantis
has done. He's just kind of gone on the outside outside wall zipped right around trump and the rest of them okay let's talk about climate john kerry says the climate strategy is modeled on the covid vaccine
rollout he says it at a world economic forum panel what you mean the mcguffin it's like i told you
it's exactly the same thing except it could be the other way around, right? The COVID vaccine rollout modeled on the
climate thing. I mean, they're interchangeable, really. But now he admits it. He admits it. He
says the climate change agenda was modeled off of the effort to roll out vaccines because they're
going to lock us down. They want zero COVID. They want zero CO2. They want zero people. They want zero liberty. They want zero movement.
They want you to own zero. You will own nothing and you'll be so much happier. You know, you'll
be happy little slaves. And every once in a while, you know, just like they did on the plantations,
they'd set up a pork barrel. Every once in a while, you know, they'll let you on a special day.
They'll let you come by and stick a fork in it.
You're done.
Anyway, John Kerry said that it is urgent for the private sector to pair with the governments
to realize the goal of preventing global temperature from rising and to save lives on the allegedly
looming global climate crisis.
It's Breitbart.
So I'm glad they at least said allegedly.
You heard when that person
confronted Clinton, and good for them for confronting Clinton. It takes a lot of guts,
but the person was kind of scared. So they said, well, it's been alleged that there are some
allegations that, you know, usually allegations alleged used it twice, twice. And he just kind
of looks at him and gives her a sly smile.
Anyway, yeah, alleged global climate crisis.
But look, Kerry is begging, begging for companies to come up.
Come on, you know, give us some money.
We're going to get you a deal here.
You're going to get in on the ground floor.
They're selling this partnership, this ESG. Kerry and the rest of these people, when they start doing it at these conventions, you know what they remind me of?
They remind me of these timeshare high-pressure salesmen. For a limited time only, you can get
this thing. Come on, you get a free vacation here. And then you need to buy into this thing.
It's just a limited time only. But you really need to buy into this thing. It's just a limited time only, but, um, uh, you really need to get into this thing. And, and, and that's the way they're selling it.
You know, you're getting on the ground floor, you know, price is only going to go up and,
you know, you might not even be able to get any space. If you don't get into the ESG thing first,
your competitors might become our partners. And then you'll be out because we're going to be allocating all the different slots of who is
allowed to own things who is allowed to do business who is going to be a stakeholder stakeholder
stakeholder capitalism crony capitalism esg it's all the same thing. It's just corruption.
It's corruption and bribery.
But I said before, the UN and Davos have a memorandum of understanding that goes back to the point at which they got very specific
about what their goals were.
They'd had a vague globalist agenda about some time in the 21st century.
In the 21st century, they're take over take over the world and put us
into cities right kick us off of the land except in these mega cities uh that was u.n agenda 21.
then in 2015 as the u.n and davos world economic forum were announcing their memorandum of
understanding and their partnership and saying, we need to accelerate this.
At that point in time, it got very specific.
They started talking about smart cities.
Every city now has a smart city agenda.
And they started talking about 2030.
And that's when Davos put out their You'll Own Nothing famous video about that.
So it's a partnership between the UN and Davos.
UN is this big, unwieldy body, kind of like a legislative body.
They create these agendas and everything, but they need to have an executive branch that's going to push it.
That's what Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum bring to them, that kind of executive
aspect of it.
And then they need to have a funding arm, because they don't yet, until they get in their
global carbon tax, they don't yet have a way that the globalists can globally tax us or that the UN
can tax us. So they need to pull in these corporations, these multinational corporations.
They provide the funding. And so this whole thing is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
And that's what Kerry's doing.
He's going around these different places and backroom deals.
Here's how you can get in.
We need your money to get this thing started,
and we're going to cut you in on a share of this piece of the pie.
Take the cake just like the godfather,
and as he's cutting up the cake,
talking about how they're going to split up Cuba,
handing out the different pieces to people,
this is what they're doing on a global basis.
We have an enormous challenge before us, said Kerry,
to bring to scale new technologies and to harness the deeply capable capacity
of private sector entrepreneurs in order to bring them to the table.
Because without it, no government has enough money.
He's surprisingly honest about this.
They're so confident of this that they can tell you, yeah, we're going to do this just
like we did it to you with the COVID pandemic.
And we got people who are going to sell you out too.
You know, we got people like Jason Kennedy, conservative in Alberta.
People like Donald Trump, who presents himself as an anti-globalist. They're going to be there. They're
going to be on our side. When it hits the fan, they're going to be doing what we tell them to do.
But we need to have some money. We can't do this. The governments aren't going to give us enough
money. We need the money from you guys to reserve your place right now in the new society that we're
going to build.
We can't do it.
We need you at the table.
Without it, the government doesn't have enough money.
We need everybody behind this, he said.
The first Movers Coalition that they created,
he says the idea behind that is we needed to create demand signals in the market where they didn't exist
this is not about any market this is about demands this is not about supply and demand
based on consumer markets no this is about a push about a demand about making demands on us i mean
he's just been talking about how they patterned this on the COVID thing.
They were making demands on us.
They weren't satisfying our demands.
Chinese locking people in cities and sealing the, you know,
in the rooms even and sealing the doors.
No, they have demands.
They're not meeting them.
So they call it the First Movers Coalition,
and he points out that it was established just before last year's COP26,
the summit in Glasgow.
Glasgow.
And so he says, and it was a partnership.
When we put together the First Movers Coalition, it was a partnership between the U.S. State Department
and Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum.
Yeah.
And they bring in private firms to do this.
So you see all of this, ESG.
We modeled it, said Kerry,
we modeled it somewhat on the experience
of what happened with vaccines.
The government said, we'll pay for it, we'll build it.
And the same thing was done with SpaceX.
Musk's thing, right?
If you build it, we're going to use it and we'll pay for it.
Oh, sounds kind of like the field of dreams, except this is a field of schemes.
Oh, so we're going to do this like we did the vaccine rollout.
We're going to do it like SpaceX.
And look at this.
Look at how rich Musk got off of SpaceX.
Look at how rich the vaccine companies got off.
Do you want to be a part of that?
You want to be some of the richest people on earth?
You want to be a made man in this worldwide mafia?
Well, here's the pattern.
We've got to have your money right now, but we can do for you what we just did
for Borla and Stefan Bonsall,
what we've done for Elon Musk.
We can do that for you too, but you've got to get in on this.
We need your money right now in this field of schemes.
If you build it, we're going to pay you for it.
How about that?
That's his promise.
Climate expert.
Yeah, Musk says MJ is going to have everyone in the u.s using a form
of wechat by 2024 china here we come i agree i mean look at what he's he's talking about having
one app to rule them all he's even talking about putting it behind a paywall which is
i think that'd be a fatal mistake um but um you know um, you know, I, I'm not, I'm going to have to see
some freedom before I would even put in, uh, an $8 a month thing. And I don't think even then I
would do it. I'd rather continue to support, uh, a bit shoot that we do. And, uh, some of these
other places, the gab, um, you know, that's what, what I want to focus my money on people who have
been there all along for freedom, people I can trust,
people who have never groveled before EU officials,
who came to tell him to grovel, and he dutifully did.
Climate expert Bjorn Lomborg noted last year
that nearly half a million people died from storms, floods, droughts,
wildfires, extreme temperatures.
A year, they did that a year.
Nearly half a million people died a year from weather 100 years ago.
But in 2020, you had only 14,000 people die in similar events.
And so it went from half a million to 14,000, dying from weather.
He says that's almost 99% lower, less death toll than a century ago. And yet, over a century, the global population has quadrupled.
So we're not all dying from climate.
We're not dying from weather.
But we will be dying when they take away our fuel and food Kerry
was joined on the World Economic Forum panel by John Podesta John Podesta
Hillary Clinton's campaign manager you know who now serves as Biden's senior
advisor on clean energy it was also a former chief of staff for Obama.
Podesta says that the Biden's Inflation Reduction Act
will be integral in pushing the climate movement forward
through various tax incentives and other methods
to prop up green industries.
Greenwashing, crony capitalism.
Podesta went on to say that it should be exciting
that global leaders are seeking to enact a, quote,
transformation of the global economy
on a size and scale that has never occurred in human history.
Their transformation is kind of like the transformation they do to kids.
They want to sterilize us and they want to cut us off.
Literally.
So Rishi Sunak is there at COP 27 and he is saying, oh yeah, you know, we got people who we got a lot of British businesses, pubs that have been around for a thousand years.
And, you know, they, some of them,
many of them went out of business with a lockdown,
barely hanging on.
And now this is going to be the fatal blow,
these high energy prices.
A lot of small businesses being put out of business.
People can't afford to heat their homes.
In Germany, the people are saying
they did a survey. A lot of them are going to have to forego buying any Christmas presents
this year, that type of thing. It's austerity as part of the de-industrialization. And yet,
Rishi Sunak pledges massive amounts of money to the green agenda, just like he's pledging massive amounts of money to the Ukraine
war.
They don't have any problem spending money except when it's to help their own people.
So I said, they're not even like the Democrats that I grew up with.
I mean, these people handing out cash, but you know, at least they, the programs seemed
to be, and of course we knew that wasn't going to be the case.
I never supported any of that stuff.
It was put out there ostensibly to help people.
We know that it didn't, just like the stimulus checks didn't help people,
made them dependent and other things like that.
And the real issue was avoiding the real problem.
You know,
the real problem that makes people poor is government.
It's taxes.
It's war,
but they're going to continue to do that.
They're going to continue to send out money to foreign countries,
foreign aid.
And this particular case is going to be foreign aid for green issues,
but they're not going to help you.
So, uh, Rishi Sunak has argued that the Ukraine war is an excuse to accelerate the green agenda.
And forget about backtracking.
Forget about keeping the lights on over the winter.
It's going to be a dark winter.
European nations, including the UK, now face a possibility of rolling blackouts this winter to keep the grid from completely going down.
And yet the UN is demanding trillions from Western countries who citizens can't even afford to keep the lights on or heat their homes over the winter.
They're now demanding because of the Ukraine war that these people have pushed
and continue to send more money into that and the escalation from the sanctions,
now they are going to demand that trillions be sent annually to third world countries.
This is nothing other than a depopulation and a deindustrialization.
That's what this is about.
It's about killing people, impoverishing people, enslaving people.
So despite all this, Sunak said on Monday,
now is the time to double down on climate change
rather than reversing course.
He said Putin's abhorrent war in Ukraine
and rising energy prices around the world,
Putin didn't do that.
The sanctions did that.
Putin is making record profits off of this stuff.
They don't even work.
He says, they're not a reason to go slow on climate change.
They are a reason to act faster.
Faster, faster, faster.
Go faster before anybody realizes what
it's really doing to you. We can turn our struggle against climate change into a global mission,
he said. Well, we know what that is. His multi-billion pound COP 27 giveaway will stick
in the throats of voters still waiting for the leveling up money
that was promised in 2009, says a former British member of parliament,
Martin Dobny.
He asked how the prime minister could ever justify spending huge sums
of public money for quote-unquote clean energy in the third world
when working class voters can't even afford to switch
on the heat well that's right because there's always enough money for war there's always enough
money to reward their corporate customers and to take things away from us this is a war on us
that's what this is about uh you, you know, interestingly enough, uh, Rishi Sunak had a
spate of popularity because he was the one who was handing out the phony money, the stimulus checks,
but then he was the one who raised taxes higher than they had seen in decades. And he became
unpopular for that. And he did all of that in the name of fiscal responsibility.
So where's the fiscal responsibility when you're going to shower
massive amounts of money in foreign aid on the basis of energy
when your own people can't even afford to turn the lights on or the heat?
So in Germany, as I mentioned, polling from a German paper, The Bild, revealed that just
under one third of the people in the country say they will not have the money to buy loved
ones Christmas presents this year because of these sanctions and these energy policies.
So the UN chief, Guterres, says that humanity is on a highway to climate hell.
And he's right about that as well,
just not in the way that he says we're going to climate hell.
It's true, but not in the way that he says.
He says it is due to the climate chaos,
is due to humanity's fossil fuel addiction.
No, it's due to the addiction to money and power of the global elitist
who want to have all money and all power concentrated in their greedy little hands.
He says, how will we answer when baby 8 billion is old enough to ask,
what did you do for our world and our planet when you had the chance?
You see how he goes to depopulation?
That really is, has been from the very beginning,
has been from the beginning of Earth Day, from Paul Ehrlich and the rest of these people,
talking about, well, how do we kill people?
How do we reduce the population quickly enough?
And they're talking about not just sterilization.
They're not just talking about reducing the number of kids that people could have
by persuasion, by nudging, or by legislation, as we saw done in China.
No, no, no.
He was talking about getting rid of people.
I played the clips for you.
Paul Ehrlich, the father of all this Earth Day garbage,
really hates humanity and wants to reduce it and so he was
talking about well you know wars are good because wars can reduce population they said the thing
that we really need is some kind of a you know respiratory virus that's going to go around and
kill people just so you know where this is coming from just so that you know this is planned and
they don't like anymore to talk openly about depopulation, but it's
always there just under the surface.
And it pops up when they say things like, well, what do we say when baby
8 billion is old enough to say, well, what did you do to stop all this stuff?
You understand he's tying the problem to the number of people.
We've got too many people and we've got to do something.
Stop it.
Now he, he moves on,
says the clock is ticking.
We're in the fight of our lives and we are losing.
Are they,
I think they're getting everything they want right now.
I think it's being handed to them by politicians who don't oppose it.
Not even an issue in this election.
Any of this stuff was not an issue.
You heard total silence from the Republicans because they're on board with this as well.
As I said before, just like we saw with the pandemic MacGuffin.
Where you had, regardless of what their party label was, what country it was, regardless of any of that stuff, they're all on the same page
with the UN and with Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum.
And the same thing is true of this as well, the climate agenda.
Regardless of the party, they're not going to oppose it.
Greenhouse gas emissions keep growing.
Global temperatures keep rising,
and our planet is fast approaching a tipping point that make climate chaos irreversible,
says this Marxist politician at the UN. But again, it is always there. It's a growing problem.
It's a population problem. It's baby 8 billion. And, 8 billion and baby 8 billion is part of the problem
too, because there is baby 8 billion. We just can't abort them quickly enough. We can't kill
them quickly enough with the jab. We can't stop people from getting married and having kids
quickly enough because we have attacked the traditional family, attacked and demonized and vilified and shamed the role of
mother well we just can't do that enough so you have um even when you talk about this uh these
people are so easy to come after if the republicans even to. Here's an example. This is a Democrat senator
who is, I don't think he was running for re-election. Maybe he was, maybe that's why he
was on. It's Tester. I don't remember if Tester was up for re-election or not,
but he's a Democrat from Montana and he was on with CNBC. Now CNBC is fully on with this climate
agenda.
They're not going to ask him any hard questions.
They're going to give him softball questions.
But he can't even defend that.
So on CNBC, Tester responded to a question about whether or not he can provide numbers
showing that carbon emission is increasing and whether or not it is increasing
the frequency and the severity of droughts or floods or anything else, right?
You know, it's got to be increasing both of them, right?
It isn't anything like, there's nothing that's happening with geoengineering.
It's not happening with chemtrails and that kind of stuff.
No, it's happening because you're driving your SUV around.
And that's what they want you to tell.
But even though they're looking at weather events,
again, I'm not buying into the fact that it's even changed,
that the climate has changed,
just because we have some unusual weather events.
But that's what he's trying to sell. says well can you provide any numbers showing that carbon emissions again carbon
emissions they're talking about co2 but they don't want to say that they talk car they say
carbon because they want to make it sound dirty can you say that carbon emissions are increasing
the frequency or the severity of floods or droughts he says well i don't know about it statistically but from real life i can tell you that it's
happening from real life i can tell you it's happening i can't prove it he doesn't even
bother to come up with some phony numbers like fauci these people are not prepared to debate the issue. We could own them on the facts if we had the will to push back against it.
So he answered, he says, well, I don't know statistically,
but from real life I can tell you that it's happening.
I mean the fact that we got rain 10 days ago.
That proves it.
The fact they got rain 10 days ago.
Now, it's called weather.
It's not called climate change.
And,
um,
when you can predict the weather,
um,
even a year in advance.
Okay.
And we can talk about that.
A tester went on to say,
he says,
well,
I'm not for shutting the spigot off right now because I don't think we're at
that point,
but I'm working for a transition.
Okay. Well, okay.
Well, um, and he was challenged on CNBC.
You know, the person asking for proof said, well, um, you know, we've always had severe
weather events, so you got any proof at all?
And he says, well, no, but I just know it's happening.
I know it's happening in real life because we got rain here the other day.
And he doesn't want to shut off the spigot right now.
But that's what they're going to do.
These people, and this is what I just can't get people to understand.
You know, years ago I was at, uh, an Austin, um, car show, classic car show.
And all these people were there that a lot of them were modified cars.
Uh, it was the, um, um, the lone star car show or something is out in Austin.
It's a big car show.
They, uh, they have, um, it has to be all American cars.
It can be modified however they want them, but it has to be 1963 or earlier.
I don't think, you know, they, I think they picked that date because the
Mustang came out in 64, whatever, you know, they wanted real classic looking cars.
But they would, uh, allow all kinds of rat rods and things like that.
You know, things that were just really put together, kludges that take like a
hot rod body, you know, using something like a Model T body and put it on a very low frame,
that type of stuff.
Modify them in all kinds of crazy ways.
And so we'd walk around.
I did a report on that one year.
And I walked around talking to all these people.
And there were a lot of them that were very old,
but there was a lot of people that were very young.
Everybody that I talked to, young or old, you know,
some of the people that were in their late teens even,
none of them thought that they were going to be allowed to have these cars eventually.
But none of them thought it was going to happen in their lifetime.
Not even the young teenagers thought this was going to happen in their lifetime.
They don't understand that people like this Democrat Senator out of Montana
tester will at some point just turn the spigot off.
He'll turn the spigot off and they're doing it right now.
They actually, you know, day one Biden turned the spigot off on 800,000
barrels of oil a day in just one pipeline.
They turned the spigot off from the second largest producer globally, Russia.
And he turned the spigot off to make it clear to any of the petroleum companies
that they don't want to build any more refineries.
If they do, they're going to go broke, as they've been told over and over again.
Well, you can build that stuff.
You'll just go broke.
That's what the Democrats love to tell them.
Well, they got the message.
They know that it's going to be prohibited.
So now the UN is telling Western countries
they're going to pay $2 trillion a year
for climate justice.
Justice.
They're using all of the same terms.
Climate justice.
Climate reparations.
This is global Marxism.
An annual transfer of funds from rich to poor countries starting at around $2 trillion by 2030
and then rising thereafter is needed for climate justice.
This is a leveling.
This is communism on a global scale.
Communism within the countries
leveling everybody
to owning nothing
and then leveling
all of the countries down
to where they can't oppose
a strong technocracy.
It's always been about
wealth transfer.
It's always been about
deindustrialization.
China is specifically excluded.
Do you understand that?
They're specifically excluded from this $2 trillion of climate justice.
Now, there was an interesting graphic, and I didn't put it in the deck here.
And it went back to 1886, and it had, in terms of energy use, carbon, quote-unquote, use.
In other words, reliable fuels like oil, gas, coal, things like that.
It went all the way back to 1886, and it was showing, bar chart again, it was like the top 10 or 20 countries and where
they were on an annual basis. And you see the years kind of picking off. And it's kind of
interesting because as it starts, Great Britain is number one in terms of energy consumption.
Okay. Now they talk about carbon emissions. I know we're talking about energy consumption. Okay? No, they talk about carbon emissions. No, we're talking about energy consumption.
So Great Britain was number one
in energy consumption, 1886.
And then the U.S. makes it smooth
and surpasses it,
and Britain shrinks back down.
And the U.S. stays a top dog
way, way, way out
in front of everybody
until you get to 1997.
1997, China comes out of nowhere
and rapidly starts coming up.
And by 2005, China surpasses the United States
and the U.S. starts to shrink.
You understand what's happening here.
Because energy consumption
is another way of
looking at production. Not only production of goods, but production of energy, production of
wealth. And so what we're seeing here is a wealth transfer. That's the transition that's happening.
And so they said China has been specifically excluded from this demand for reparations,
which includes taxes for fossil fuel companies on their global, quote-unquote, carbon profits.
Who are we going to pay these taxes to?
A global government.
You can't have a global government for long. Right now, they're using these corporations as the piggy banks for their global governance.
But they want to have a real global government.
In order to do that, they have to have a tax base.
So they have to have a global problem so that they can fund that.
And that's what the carbon tax is about.
It's about manufacturing a bogus problem so they can take real wealth from us.
The first $1 trillion alone should come from rich companies, they said,
and from investors, and from multilateral development banks.
Usual suspects coming in here to divide this up.
But a further $1.4 trillion must then originate domestically
from private and public sources.
Rishi Sunak's government has already signaled
that it is open to talking about climate reparations and climate justice.
This guy is supposed to be a conservative.
Like I said, in our country, talking about climate reparations and climate justice, this guy is supposed to be a conservative.
Like I said, in our country,
we've seen the Democrats, liberals,
go from socialism into full-on hardcore Marxism,
totalitarianism.
They push for war.
They attack free speech.
They want complete control over your thoughts.
And we see that now with the so-called conservatives as well,
talking like Marxists.
So he's willing to talk about climate reparations as he prepares tax hikes and public service cuts at home,
reports as Breitbart puts it,
in the name of fiscal responsibility.
So we're going to increase taxes,
we're going to cut services at home,
and to be fiscally responsible,
but we're also going to spend billions,
tens of billions, hundreds of billions
of foreign climate reparations.
The new 100-page analysis,
finance for Climate Action,
see, it's coming from the bankers, it's coming from the usual suspects.
It is a blueprint to deliver Paris Climate Treaty goals of capping the rise of global temperatures below 2 degrees Celsius,
at 1.5 degrees Celsius, if possible.
Well, you're going to cap it at that compared to what
compared to what compared to when and compared to how did you collect this data in the first place
the founder of the weather channel pointed out that you know we haven't been collecting data
for that long and that many places they even have a database to compare it to. Furthermore, for virtually the entire time, you had thermometers
that were mercury thermometers, and you can't read them to that kind of accuracy of one
degree or less. And where are the temperatures being collected today? Are they being collected
on airport tarmacs or other urban heat islands.
It calls for grants and low-interest loans from the governments of developed countries to double from about $30 billion annually to about $60 billion by 2025.
Coming up very, very quickly.
So the emerging markets are going to include large economies in the global south that have seen rapid growth.
Places like Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia, Vietnam.
Historically seen as part of this group, China was excluded from the new estimates,
even as it remains one of the world's single greatest polluters and users of coal-generated power. And this has always been the lie behind the Paris Climate Accord,
which was supported by Rex Tillerson, by Ivanka Trump, and all the rest of them,
which was never shut down by Mitch McConnell, who had the authority to do that.
Instead, he pretended and went along with a farce from Obama and from John Kerry,
saying that they had self-ratified this?
No.
He knows that they didn't ratify the treaty.
He knows that they couldn't self-ratify it.
And the thing that he could have done
was at any time when they had a majority of Republicans,
they could have called a vote and shut it down,
shut down that fraud.
Trump could have done it.
Trump didn't do it.
He said, well, we're going to shut it down.
We're going to get out of it the day after the election, 2020.
See how fraudulent that is?
The COP27 climate conference opened Sunday with about 40,000 attendees having flown in from all around the world to Egypt.
And we'll be talking tomorrow to Alex Newman, who is there.
But again, when you look at this, China and India have been exempted from the very beginning
on this Paris Climate Accord.
All the rest of the countries had to cap and then reduce right now in reduction mode.
They're allowed to continue to add power plants and refineries and all the rest of this stuff
and continue to use coal.
And they don't even have to pretend to do clean plants.
They can build as many plants as they want, and they can be as dirty as they want.
And so some of these people who really believe all this climate nonsense said,
how can this be?
This is a global problem.
How can you allow the two countries that have the biggest population on earth
to continue to build the dirtiest, cheapest power plants that they can build?
That doesn't help to do it.
It's always been about deindustrialization of the West.
It's always been about a transfer of power and wealth from us to China and to India.
Oman's energy minister says it's foolish to assume renewables can meet global demand.
Well, he's saying the obvious part out loud.
But then we have the people like John Tester, senator from Montana, saying,
well, I can't show you any statistics.
I don't have any proof of this stuff. I just feel it because it rained the other day. Gerald Smith, thank you
very much for the tip. He says, spot on analysis of the midterms. I couldn't get Republicans to
confront the issues openly in Pennsylvania. That's right. They won't confront the issues
of the election. They won't confront the issues of our lives and our liberty. And the one guy who did it just a little bit, look at what happened to his popularity.
But, yeah, they will not go there.
They are not going to solve any of these problems.
We'll be right back.
Stay with us. ¶¶ In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, you know, Trump as president pushed the vaccines pretty
hard at the very end, but you know what he was pushing harder than
anything throughout his administration was five G and I had a listener
remind me that going back to 2017, uh, they got carve outs for Palm beach.
Yeah.
Where Mar Lago is and where the rich people are, the richest people are in Florida.
Uh, and when I talked about five G the other day, and he sent me an email and
uh, said, um, uh, said, uh, how come there's no mention of this and the odyssey video?
Well, it was an oversight.
Let's correct that right now, because going back to 2017, he pointed that out. He
actually sent me the article from the Palm Beach Daily News. Official says Palm Beach will be
exempt from 5G wireless law. Since I talked about this 5G rollout, it's now being picked up. It's
actually picked up, I think, even by Drudge because the New York Times is now talking about it.
It was a local paper there in New York that was talking about it.
People waking up in the morning and it's like, you know,
the day of the Triffids or something.
There's all these poles that have sprung up overnight, 30 feet or more,
and they've got these big things the size of a refrigerator on them,
and some of them are right outside their door right outside their window right outside their bedroom window right
outside the window where their baby sleeps and closer than 10 feet right up
against the building and they took pictures about the fact that it had a
box that said warning don't get real close to these things right so they
called up the city and said hey there's a warning here about the close proximity.
We'll send somebody out.
They sent somebody out and they removed the stickers, not the radiation.
Yeah, we don't want you getting upset.
We'll just remove the label.
It kind of sounds like the vaccines, doesn't it?
Yeah, we removed the label.
We saw that with the vaccines.
We had people saying, you know, excuse me, Mr. Pharmacist, I'm here for my shot, but I'd like to be able to see the label. We saw that with the vaccines. We had people saying, you know, uh, Mr. Excuse me,
Mr. Pharmacist. Um, I'm here for my shot, but I'd like to be able to see the label.
And, uh, pharmacist goes back in here. Well, I can't find it anywhere. We don't have one.
There isn't anyone. I looked up, they didn't put out a label talking about adverse effects. We
shouldn't be selling this stuff without a label. Well, just like the vaccine,
the 5G stuff is a large experiment being conducted against us. We already know there's a lot of very,
very negative effects from a lot of the electromagnetic radiation. We talked about
the Frye effect and many of these other things. I talked about that in the video, but I didn't
talk about the carve-outs for the wealthy people.
So here we are, 2017, five years ago.
And the town manager, Tom Bradford, said, Palm Beach and some other coastal communities have been exempted
from legislation that would limit local control
on the installation of 5G transmission equipment.
Now, at the time, Rick Scott, who is now a senator, was governor.
The legislation was passed by the House and the Senate and is awaiting Governor Rick Scott's
signature, said Bradford.
He said, we have been carved out.
This law does not apply to us.
Well, why is that?
I mean, don't these, you know, in New York City,
they have the Link New York City thing
where they're going to provide free internet
to all the poor people.
In order to do that, they're going to put these devices
right up next to their windows.
And they should be grateful.
You know, some of the poor people that are there are saying, well, our service is fine.
We don't want that.
We don't need it.
Mainly at this point in time, some of them are concerned about health issues.
A lot of them are just concerned because, hey, it's blocking.
I can't see out my window here.
Or, you know, this is ugly and that type of thing.
But it doesn't matter what it is.
They're not going to get a carve out.
No, they're going to give it to the poor people and they're going to give it to them good and hard.
But the rich people don't want it.
They don't need it.
It's needed for you poor people who are having too many kids.
We're going to need it for these poor people because there's too many of them.
Let's keep it away from the rich people.
We don't want to kill them.
So they get an exemption.
They get a carve out.
The legislation, the Florida legislature,
severely limits state and local government control
over public right-of-ways where 5G is going to be put.
So at the same time, the state is putting limitations on local government saying no.
They're doing a carve-out for the richest community.
So telling all the other communities, you don't have any say-so on this, but we're going
to let the rich people at Mar-a-Lago and other places off of this.
And yet, was there anything that Trump pushed harder than 5G?
Remember that?
We, in essence, could have every public right-of-way marred by a utility
that we have no control over, he said.
And so the legislature agreed.
Oh, yes, you're rich.
We shouldn't be doing this to you.
The town will have much more control in regulating where the 5G equipment,
small, and they put small cells, they put that in quotes,
because then they point out they're the size of a small refrigerator,
where those will be located.
So, you know, if you don't want it there, we will comply with that.
You see, the Telecommunications Act of 1996,
when Donald Trump's Epstein buddy Bill Clinton was president,
in the 1996 Telecommunications Act,
the federal government presumed to have the power that they don't
to tell people that they can't object to cell phone towers and where they put them.
Except in reality, a lot of local jurisdictions did. A lot of local jurisdictions sued when they
saw cancer clusters around schools where they had clustered these antennas in close proximity to
children.
Children are kind of like the canaries in the coal mine because their body is developing faster.
And so these effects show up more quickly with them. So you had lawsuits. Some of them were won and other things in local jurisdictions where they said, no, you're going to move this thing
or you're going to shut it down. We're going to have some say so about this. And so in Florida,
they decide, well, we're going to restrict that preemptively with 5G rollout.
But at the same time, they do carve-outs for the wealthy.
I had Jorge, who's a listener from Spain.
He says, thank you for your comments.
Watching today your segment on 5G towers suddenly everywhere,
I recollected some information about recent decisions
with vital repercussions for the entire human population,
which were adopted by the new criminals
with the passivity of their victims, us.
How come those characters managed to display their crimes
and 7 billion people accept their abject plans and their insulting arrogance.
I think it's really an incomprehensible mystery.
Please, if you think it deserves some of your comments in the show, tell the audience your thoughts.
It would be interesting.
Well, it is.
It is a great delusion.
And I think, you know, when you look at what is happening,
when you look at what is happening with Trump and the MAGA movement,
when you're looking at the non-pushback against the vaccines,
against the masks, against the social distancing rituals,
and all of this stuff,
when you look at the passivity of people, as you pointed out,
I think it is a great delusion.
I think it's been sent from God as judgment on us, quite frankly.
I mean, I just look at it like you do, Jorge.
I look at it and shake my head.
It's like, how could people fall for this?
How could people fall for these?
How could they be so attached, so paranoid and fearful,
and yet at the same time trusting in these cloth masks of any kind.
They never ask.
You know, as long as you've got something covering your face,
it doesn't matter how thick or thin it is.
You've just got to have something covering your face.
It's totally irrational.
It is a delusion.
Speaking of all this, you've got one guy, Palmer Lucky.
And I guess he is lucky.
He's 30 years old.
He's a multi-billionaire.
And he's gotten very, very rich designing video games.
I've had several people send me this.
I had it in my stack of stuff to talk about yesterday.
And I didn't get to it.
But it's a thing that he set up.
If you die in this VR game, it'll actually kill you in real life.
So you've got this VR headset, and they put some cartridges there,
explosive charges, that could be detonated.
If you die in the game, it'll blow your brains out. Uh, uh, it was put on a, uh, virtual reality headset
and opens, uh, to, uh, open up the new game called sword art online. And so, uh, you know,
this is part of this is promotion. Part of it is a gag. Uh, but he made some very disturbing
comments about this. Yeah. You know, it was going to be very controversial.
It did get picked up by a lot of different outlets, uh, got picked up by the New York post and, and many others.
Um, and, uh, so, um, I don't think that this story is, uh, is fake.
Um, and I got, uh, my son is saying sword art online is fish is fictional.
Well, then, uh, maybe it is saying sword art online is Fisher is fictional.
Well then, uh, maybe it is fake, but, um, they owned a lot
of big media outlets for this.
And, uh, whether or not, uh, the comments from this guy are legit.
They're saying that, um, what are you saying is that, uh, um,
it's not available to buy, but they wanted to do it.
And again, I don't know if they're, I first, I looked at this and I thought that it was
a way to promote this game, but you're saying that game doesn't exist.
Okay.
Well, then maybe the whole thing is a gag and maybe a New York post and I did also fell
for it, but some of the statements that were made and he put it on his blog.
So, you know, maybe he's just trolling people.
Um, he says it's a piece of office art uh he said it's just uh unexplored avenues and game design and that kind of stuff you know and he says uh but this is a direction that we need to think about
the idea of tying your real life to your virtual avatar uh look all this stuff i think all the
virtual reality stuff is absolutely fake.
And it is a way of pushing us into transhumanism.
That's the point I was going to make about this.
And whether this is real or not,
this is something that these people are using to push us more and more into virtual reality.
The reality of VR is put out by people like Yuval Harari, who says, well, you know, how
do we control these people?
You know, we've got a lot of people out there.
There's too many people.
We need to find some ways to reduce the population.
But in the meantime, how do we control people?
He says, well, we'll do it with video games.
You know, we could do it with drugs, but we could also do it with video games, right?
And when you look at the war on drugs as a means of control, I think we can really kind of tie this together with what is happening in Australia.
In Australia, they're making a major push for facial recognition on the justification
that they're going to help problem gamblers.
We got people out there who are addicted to gambling,
and so we've got to help them.
And so in order to help them,
we're going to create a dystopian police state,
and we're going to scan everybody.
Well, you know, that's not that far off
from what their justification was for the war on drugs.
We've got people out there who are addicted to this stuff,
so let's approach it with law enforcement.
Let's approach it with law enforcement. Let's approach
it with surveillance and let's create this prohibition to save people from what they
can't help themselves, right? They're addicted to drugs or they're addicted to gambling.
And so we have to have law enforcement help them. This is a secular approach to all of this that is destined to fail.
But it's just, it's not even,
they weren't planning on stopping anybody from getting these drugs.
Now you go back and you look at the crack cocaine epidemic
that was created by the CIA,
exposed by Gary Webb, who first won a journalistic prize for that.
And then the Los Angeles Times put together a group of people to take him down
and to take away his award.
And it looked like they had kicked him out, but he started making a comeback.
He was feeling real good.
He was back into all this, even asked if he was suicidal.
Oh, no, no, not suicidal.
And then he turned up dead not too long after that.
They said, well, he committed suicide.
No, he was making a comeback with that.
Our government pushed the crack cocaine thing.
Our government developed that.
And the same government that has taken away so many of our freedoms,
same government that has been corrupted, law enforcement, the judiciary,
same government that's locked up more law enforcement, the judiciary, same government
that's locked up more people because of politicians like Joe Biden, who passed the laws to lock
up more people than China does.
All that justified because we've got to help people who can't help their addiction.
They don't see this as treated as a medical problem or a psychological problem.
They don't understand that it is a spiritual problem,
but they don't even,
you know,
treat some of the,
uh,
closer,
uh,
issues,
things that are closer to the,
the fundamental thing is a spiritual issue.
Even the medical and psychological issues are secondary effects of that.
But instead they use law enforcement.
And so now they're going to use law enforcement,
save people from,
um,
their gambling addiction by putting facial recognition everywhere.
Supporters say it will help to curb the problem of gambling in a country where
the addiction affects about 1% of the population and the annual losses run into
the billions of dollars.
So, you know, same, same logic we had for the war on drugs. We can have now a war on gambling.
And everything they do is there to justify a police state
and a surveillance state.
And so this is just the latest justification for it.
But they also want to channel you into virtual reality.
And games are going to be a big part of that.
And a big part of that control to take you out of reality, to get you to live a fantasy
life.
You know, already in our society, the fantasy life is much, much, much stronger than it
was a hundred years ago, for example, unbelievably stronger.
You know, a hundred years ago, people didn't spend so much of their time
thinking about movies or watching the kinds of visual entertainment we had.
They didn't have it.
Didn't have the technology.
And so all this technology and entertainment has taken us out of
the real world to a large extent.
Well, you're talking about the internet or video or movies or games, any of
that kind of stuff, and they're going to put that on steroids.
They want us completely out of the real world,
and they want us buying into this transhumanism.
Even if they don't physically alter us,
they want us to mentally spend our time doing that,
mentally identify with that.
And at the same time, that's happening in Australia.
And they're justifying putting up biometric facial surveillance
and massive databases everywhere so they can protect a gambling addiction.
In the UK, you have gambling companies were given access
to private exam results of students.
Why would they do that?
Why would they give that to gambling companies?
They did it to 28 million kids.
This report from Reclaim the Net said,
UK Information Commissioner John Edwards has criticized the Department of
Education for allowing betting firms to access the personal information and
exam results of children.
I don't know what they're getting from these results.
I've said for the longest time,
I forget who originally came up with a quote,
but they said that Las Vegas is a city, uh, built on, uh, the gullibility of people who
can't do math, probability results.
And, and that the longer you run this thing, you know, you're, they've set up the probability
so that the longer you play the game, the more certain you are to lose money.
So it's based on people who don't understand probability and statistics.
And so maybe that's what they're looking for.
Maybe they give us the exams of people so we can target the kids who got low math scores so we can get them addicted to gambling. Edwards, the UK Information Commissioner, said that
if this government
entity, the Department for
Education, was a private
company, he would have fined it
10 million pounds,
but he decided not to do
so because the money would still go back to the government.
I can't
do anything when the government violates your privacy.
See, that's the issue.
That's why the left has always so been out of shape when, uh, private companies are spying
on people, but they don't realize that the private companies are actually giving the
money, you know, giving the information to the government and the government's the one
that's going to do something.
You know, private companies will use that information, try to sell you something.
The government will use that to try to put you in jail.
So he said, no one needs persuading that a database of pupils' learning records
being used to help gambling companies is unacceptable.
Our investigation found the processes put in place by the Department for Education were woeful.
He said the data was misused.
They were even unaware that there was a problem.
So why are they turning this over to the gambling companies again?
Strange.
When we look at what is going on with Twitter, as I said before, you know, Elon Musk is talking
about, they said there's been some rumors, some discussions between him and another investor
as to whether or not they had to put up a paywall for Twitter.
You know, let you use it free for a little bit, you know, just like you see the paywalls
at New York Times and things like that.
Well, you know, you get to look at X number of articles per month.
And then, sorry, you've had your free articles for the month, then you got to pay.
You know, looking at that type of thing for Twitter, that completely kill it.
But that's the way the rich people think.
If you want to pay extra for everything, go stay at an expensive hotel.
They will nickel and dime you, and there won't be nickels and dimes.
It'll be dollars and tens of dollars for everything that you would get for free
at a cheaper hotel.
But Musk is now talking about hiring back some of the people that he fired.
But here's an interesting aspect of what he's done.
He has most of the people who got fired were the liberal Americans,
but not too many H-1B foreigners.
And again, this has been a big part.
This is Breitbart talks about this because Breitbart is about the only people
anymore focused on immigration.
And it's not just the illegal immigration that's happening across the border,
but it's the tech workers that are being brought in because they'll work much
more cheaply than Americans will.
Unless you're talking about somebody like Parag,
who was the CEO of Twitter.
He didn't work cheaply.
Or their little censored tyrant, Gade, both of them from India, they didn't work too cheaply.
But there's going to be a national origin discrimination lawsuit against all these companies,
including Twitter and some other Fortune 500 companies,
because they're violating the civil rights of American professionals,
said Jay Palmer, an Alabama-based immigration and human trafficking expert.
He said, we had 10 people contact me about a possible class action lawsuit
because the CEOs are not firing the H-1Bs.
They're firing the upper echelon managers and the Americans, and they're keeping the H-1Bs. They're firing the upper echelon managers and the Americans,
and they're keeping the H-1Bs in order to keep their costs down.
So there you go.
As they are selectively firing people
because they can get cheaper labor from foreign workers,
and this is why the Republicans have not attacked this,
because it's not just the people who are picking fruit in the farms,
coming in and working very cheaply.
But it's also the big tech companies who want to bring in foreign engineers
to work as H-1B.
So both the Democrats and Republicans look the other way or help them with this.
Now business giants are going to get lower interest rates
if they meet diversity quotas.
So it's not just that they'll fire you if you are a higher paid American, but now they're
going to block you and they'll also block your speech.
They don't like it here.
They also will fire you for your skin color.
They'll fire you for ESG.
And the banks are right at the center of all of this.
Many prominent businesses are now writing racial and gender quotas into their credit
arrangements with banks, tying the cost of borrowing to the company's workforce diversity.
This is from the Washington Free Beacon, an analysis that they did.
They said giant companies like Pfizer and Ernst & Young and BlackRock, Carlisle Group, okay,
these are the people, Telefonica, the telecommunications giant. These people are doing
deals with the biggest banks. You know, the banks that are too
big to fail and too big to jail. You know, the banks like Bank of America and Wells Fargo and
all the rest of them. They're doing this just like the banks are coming together to shut down
and to punish our speech, to shut down and punish the Second Amendment as well. The First Amendment free speech
and the Second Amendment gun stores and gun manufacturers.
But now they also want to attack us
for the color of our skin.
Credit, this is known as a credit facility.
And it links the interest rate charged by the banks
to the company's internal diversity targets,
creating an incentive for racism and discrimination.
That's what this is about.
Institutionalized financial discrimination.
Just like they discriminate against industries and against our political beliefs and speech.
So BlackRock will be benefiting from this.
BlackRock will be a part of this.
I said, let's say Wells Fargo will loan to BlackRock at 1% if it meets diversity quotas,
and the market interest rate is 5%, said the executive director of consumers research.
Every other company that has to borrow money at 5% is now at a disadvantage vis-a-vis BlackRock.
So other companies will have to follow BlackRock's lead or they will go out of business
because BlackRock will be able to subsidize its products through Wells Fargo.
So BlackRock, Wells Fargo, Bank of America,
which manages the credit facilities for Trimble, Carlisle, and Pfizer,
did not respond to requests for comments.
Yeah, it's a full-on program.
Again, the banks, the end game is a financial reset.
CBDC, but the banks are going to be there at the
center of taking everything from us. Just take a look at what is happening already. You know,
even though it was not the top issue by long shot with Democrats, they couldn't make the connection
as to what's happening with this, with inflation. One in four Americans can only afford to spend
$100 on Thanksgiving, or they're just completely skipping it altogether.
As we talked about, a third of the Germans in a poll said,
well, we're going to have to skip Christmas.
We can't afford to buy presents.
So what will you do this year to save money on Thanksgiving?
They ask in a poll.
So it goes from things like pay attention to deals, use coupons,
start shopping early, stick to my grocery list, compare prices, buy items in bulk, shop the pantry first.
You know, all these different things or just skip it altogether.
But about a quarter of them say, well, skip it.
That's exactly where we're happening.
And that's what they want to do to all of us.
So we're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back. And before we run out of time, we want to talk about some of the
vaccine issues. We'll be right back. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we have lab-grown red blood cells
being transformed into people in a trial in the UK. So now after destroying blood,
after you've seen these pictures of these long fibrous rubber things that many embalmers are
getting out of the veins of people who have died, after we have adulterated the blood with the vaccines, now we're going to go to
a completely synthetic blood.
No problem, right?
That's perfectly fine.
As one person, Mark Shaw, says, our addiction to unnecessary medicine is letting our children
down.
Mark Shaw writes that.
Well, that's a mild way to put it, isn't it?
Our addiction to
unnecessary medicine. Why are people losing confidence in vaccines, says Dr. David Patton.
Well, I can think of many different reasons that people are losing it, but this is one of the
reasons why. An example of this is what is happening with RSV.
I've had several listeners after I mentioned it,
and we talked about it in an interview with a medical professional,
how they are pushing people into RSV.
I heard the commercials pushed one after the other on Pandora.
GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer are in competition to see who can rush out their RSV vaccine more quickly.
But I got this from a listener abroad, and he said,
you've talked many times about the effects in Samoa of an MMR vaccine,
and it was back in 2018, spring of 2018, the two toddlers that died immediately after getting the vaccine.
One toddler gets shot and dies immediately.
That was pretty much unprecedented. We hadn't seen that type of thing before the mRNA shots.
So that created quite a stir, especially because the next one in line, the mother said, we're going to leave.
I said, no, no, no, no, no.
It didn't have anything to do with the vaccine.
Come on, you know, talked her into it.
Her child got the vaccine and immediately died.
And so it's a big story in New Zealand, a big story in Samoa.
They came after the nurses of all things.
Held the vaccine company harmless.
Came after the nurses.
It's like, how in the world does this happen?
Uh,
but he says,
um,
um,
you often remind us of the Samoa nurses who got the sack for the bag,
bad vaccines that killed two babies.
But here's a similar story from Uganda and East Africa,
the same MO.
And he says,
notice how the heroic police quote swung into action to arrest the wrong M.O. And he says, notice how the heroic police, quote,
swung into action to arrest the wrong people, the wrong people.
And so this is the sudden death of a baby shortly after vaccination.
Landed two medical workers from Kampala in trouble.
They named the nurses at the facility.
The two are locked up in the Kabbalah Gala police station.
I mean, that's seriously, Kabbalah Laga.
Kabbalah Gala, Kampala.
That's a tongue twister for me.
It's not my native language.
And so they're in jail shortly because of the death of
a nine-month-old who died shortly after being vaccinated at their facility. Isn't it funny
that all the people that have dropped dead shortly after being vaccinated with the Trump shots,
nobody has arrested any nurses for any of this stuff. And yet here in this country, they did.
When I reached the hospital, the doctors there just looked at my baby
and they told me that I had taken a dead body there.
They told me that the baby had long died
and the referral I was given was just a waste of time.
They said the mother noticed some minor changes after the vaccination
and said, we've taken it to a toxicological sample from the victims
and we are now waiting for the results.
So again, they're going to arrest the nurses,
but not the people who produced the poison.
Moderna's spike vax, by the way, this is just a warning for people.
If you can't talk your friends and relatives out of getting the vaccine, at least tell
them not to get the Moderna vaccine.
It's got a much, much higher rate of adverse effects than even the Pfizer does.
With the Pfizer, some of the data shows that with every jab,
it doubles your risk of very serious adverse effects or death.
But with Moderna, it goes up at a much, much faster rate.
So, you know, it goes up like a factor of four with each one of these jabs.
The Defender, which is Children a factor of four, uh, with each one of these jabs, uh, the defender,
which is a children's health defense fund says, uh, Moderna's spike vax, uh, is much
higher that that's their trade name.
Uh, then Pfizer's core Monati.
It's been nearly two years since Moderna's vaccine made its debut in the U S but research
on the shot is far from over.
This is published in the American college of Cardiology because, you know, just like autism, now cardiological effects for young
people, it's just ordinary, right? First, they dismiss it by saying it's rare. And then within
just a few months, it's like, oh, well, we've always had this type of thing. Well, why'd you
tell us it was rare?
Well, because they've been lying to us about everything.
They said the second and third COVID vaccine may relapse a particular disease called glomerular disease.
And so, as a matter of fact, we just went into a store yesterday as we were going in.
There were some people in the store talking about it, how a friend of theirs had had a relapse of
shingles and how serious it was. They're afraid they're going to lose their eye from the shingles.
It was such a serious, and I just came this close to asking them if they're vaccinated. But at that
point, it really doesn't help anything.
People don't want to be told that they made the wrong decision.
But the next wave is coming.
They did it with monkeypox.
You see all these articles from establishment media saying,
oh, monkeypox, be very afraid.
But then they lost their gambit on that because it became pretty obvious
that what they were seeing was something that was limited to the small population of people who were promiscuous and homosexual.
And so now they're going to RSV, which is one of the more common things that are out there.
And they want to scare everybody about that.
Be very afraid.
If you can't get you afraid of COVID anymore,
let's pivot to flu and to RSV,
respiratory synaptial virus.
It has always been more of a nuisance than a threat, but now they're telling everybody it's a threat.
And as I said before,
it is a race for the money as to who is going to get their vaccine
approved by the pushover FDA the most quickly. They have to make this into an emergency.
And so just like they're telling everybody, you know, well, with monkeypox, it can be spread,
and you can be spreading this even before you've got any symptoms. They're trying to make this the case that RSV is everywhere.
I've now had people sending me letters about this as well.
This is one listener says, yeah, hey, David,
I've seen RSV everywhere since you talked about it.
I told my wife that this is the next contagion.
Just saw this in my Google News feed.
It says, first RSV emergency declared. Just saw this in my Google News feed.
It says, first RSV emergency declared as Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline raced to get the vaccines approved.
Southern California's Orange County Health Department has now declared an emergency.
You know, they're the same people who are out there saying, look at our cases.
Our number of cases are up by 25% of COVID. It's coming back. We're going to have to do this all over again.
And again, when you look at it, uh, you know, what they're actually trying to tell people in
terms of the number of cases, uh, out of a city of, um, I forget how many millions of people it
is in LA. And I had it on a, on an article here that I didn't get to a couple of days um, I forget how many millions of people it is in LA. And I had it on a, on an article here
that I didn't get to a couple of days ago, but it is teeny, teeny, tiny fraction of a percent
of a people who are, um, infected with it. The case infection rate is the infection rate that
they're showing is so incredibly minuscule,
but they won't tell you that they'll tell you, Oh,
we've got a thousand people or something out of how many millions of people in
LA. Uh, and then they'll tell you, and a couple of them died.
Did they die from it? Did they die with it? Did they die with a PCR test?
What is your cycle threshold? How many, how much did you magnify?
All of these questions,
but it's the same MO that they've used from the very beginning
and so uh this type of thing people the word one silver lining to this is that the word has
finally gotten out about the vaccines and so um you know it's um even people
some of the actors are getting very angry about the fact that they're not going to be allowed to have a job
unless they get the vaccine.
And this is still in effect.
They still have vaccine requirements in L.A. and the film industry,
or you're not going to work.
And this is not just for the actors.
This is for everybody in every aspect of it. So Fran Drescher, who was in the TV series The Nanny,
came out blasting the vaccine mandates.
She said, to make that one vaccine,
the criteria for who is allowed to work,
who is allowed to travel, who is allowed to dine,
to go to the theater, et cetera,
is an infringement of the Disabilities Act,
of the Freedom of Religion Act, and of body sovereignty.
Good.
Yeah.
My body, my choice?
No, not when it comes to the vaccines.
All these people out there, all these leftist celebrities, and I don't know if she's leftist
or not, but she understands this. All these people out there who were
defiant about abortion, but they are working in this industry that is absolutely demanding
that they inject something we now know is very harmful, the genetic code injection,
into their body as a condition of work. Hollywood studios, many of them,
are still requiring the vaccine in order to work.
A few of them have lifted the mandates,
but most of them are still in place.
This is not going away.
As a matter of fact, they're looking for new ways
to pull in the same stuff, and this is why
they have to attack the foundation
of this medical martial law.
And the Republicans are not going to do it.
We're going to have to do this at a local level.
We're going to have to do it ourselves.
There's no saviors coming to help us with any of this stuff.
So she put up a video recently.
She said, to think that every human on the planet
can take one vaccine is ludicrous.
And to make that one vaccine the criteria for everything
is ludicrous, and to make that one vaccine the criteria for everything is ludicrous. We as a nation must be careful that fear does not turn into fascism.
She understands. When equal citizens stop being equal, when cards must be presented to identify
whether you are included or excluded, we stand at a tipping point of an America that I no longer recognize.
Even though I myself am vaccinated, I must applaud Disney
for taking the position not to vaccine mandate their sets any longer.
Well, there you go.
Small favors that we get from Disney.
The problem with discrimination is there will always be good people
who justify it because of an extreme condition.
But it is those times especially when we must fight even harder.
It's the same argument for speech, right?
If you only support the speech of people that you don't have a problem with,
you don't support free speech.
And that is what we're looking at with this.
Well, we're nearly
out of time. I wanted to, there's some things, of course, I didn't have time to get into today.
One of them in particular was from a trucker who has supported the program, contacted us many times,
Mike Nichols. He says, we're seeing FreightWaves, which is a trade
organization for truckers, talking about a truck driver shortage. He says, you often reference them
as a source in your supply chain coverage, so it seems like they could be a good source. But he
says, they're talking about the alleged trucker shortage. The writer does a good job at countering the usual platitudes of the American Trucking
Association and giving equal coverage to the perspectives of the American small business
trucker.
I mentioned in a couple of the blurbs toward the end of the article, but she has done a
great job covering the current railroad strife and has indicated to me that she would be
available for an interview.
So I'll look into getting in touch with her because, as I've said for the longest time,
one of the key areas that they're looking to shut down, of course, is independent businesses of all types.
It's the independent truckers that in California they really focused on.
They say, well, we're going to shut you off a certain areas.
They're trying to push everybody into becoming an employee of just a few big
corporations.
So they don't want anybody who is even has a nail salon or a hair salon,
let alone somebody who's got their own trucking business.
So they're doing everything they can to shut that down.
And they're coming now with more regulation,
more fear stories because they thought, I think they believed that they were going to have this autonomous driving stuff much further along than it's turned out.
And so they've got plan B that they're falling back on.
But we'll get into that tomorrow's program along with much of the other stuff I didn't have time to cover today.
Thanks for joining us.
The Common Man.
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation,
deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us
while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around
and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.