The David Knight Show - INTERVIEW: CONTROLIGARCHS - Following the Money (and Schemes) of the World's Richest Men

Episode Date: November 14, 2023

Seamus Brunner, Director of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), breaks down the money and the M.O. of the globalist agenda in his new book "CONTROLIGARCHS: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life"Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

bruner and he's got a book that is releasing today as a matter of fact really happy to have him on the book is control agarics exposing the billionaire class their secret deals and the globalist plot to dominate your life and that's being released today so i'm really excited to uh talk to him thank you for joining us, Seamus. Appreciate it. It's a pleasure to be with you, David. So tell us a little bit about this. I know I've seen several of your articles on Breitbart. They've been talking quite a bit about control of GARCs.

And you've been talking about the research that you've uncovered about these guys, Gates, Zuckerberg, and all the rest of these people. What is it that they want from us? Just total control, isn't it? Yeah, that's right. I work with a guy named Peter Schweitzer at the Government Accountability Institute. And our motto there is follow the money. And I've been with Schweitzer for 10 years, following the money to the politicians. We expose the insider trading in Congress, where the members would be trading stocks on bills that would affect their bottom line.

Essentially, we did Clinton cash and Bush bucks. We're nonpartisan, so we like to go after both sides. I remember. Yeah. And when you go after these guys, you got a target rich environment, don't you? When you follow the money, it's everywhere. So with this project, we followed it all the way to the top. And you get into Bill Gates and Zuckerberg and the World Economic Forum and Davos, and there's a lot of conspiracy theories. You've really got to sift through the fact and the fiction. Bill Gates is buying farmland because he wants to grow food to poison you. That's not what we allege or have found here.

But what we have found is that key industries that affect every aspect of your life, whether it's food, health, the financial sector, there's things coming that are kind of frightening. It's not conspiracy theory. Yeah. They are trying to control everything. And I was just talking earlier about both Bill Gates' move into healthcare and data mining for healthcare. And at the same time, the people in the UK are very concerned about the NHS because of Palantir and Peter Thiel and how they're getting involved in the data aspect of the healthcare. Because that's going to be a big leverage for them to get that data, to get involved at the ground level with health care. And it all really ties together. All this stuff ties together with Bill Gates' desire to give people IDs. I saw this in India

with the Aadhaar system, where you get an ID and they're going to be able to get welfare and you'll be able to get health care. And so it gives them leverage and control, but it also helps them with a government as well. It seems like it's kind of a public-private partnership, isn't it, that they have with these governments, making themselves as stakeholders in all this. Yeah, that's exactly right. We examine the digital ID, we examine the public-private partnerships. And the thing about the public private partnerships is it's essentially taxpayers subsidize any losses, but then men like Bill Gates privatize all of the gains. And so it's really an unfair system for people like you and me who are not cut in on these new healthcare things. And we're talking trillions of dollars. I mean, in the end, whether it's the energy industry and his nuclear power company, or

it's the food industry and a lot of these alternative protein companies, uh, the healthcare industry, of course. So many, many trillions of dollars are at stake here. And it's just a few players. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. And when we look at it, one of the things that people have talked about for a long time is Bill Gates and the eugenics race. It seems to me like that also ties in with the climate agenda as well.

Because I remember I'm old enough to remember the first Earth Day and I remember what preceded it, Paul Ehrlich and his population bomb. This has always been about population control. And that's one aspect of it. But there's also the eugenics aspect of it that you cover. Tell us a little bit about that from your perspective. Right. People hear the word eugenics and it harkens back to like Nazi scientists. And it's kind of, you know, that sounds nutty. But indeed, they are funding this CRISPR-Cas9 research where you'll be able to select the traits of your offspring, whether it's choosing the eye color. And they're working closely with China, which is a really big threat. I mean, you see that, of course, with the Wuhan lab tinkering with viruses.

Well, they're also tinkering with genetics. And China has claimed to have genetically modified a human. And we're just really on the precipice here of a kind of a scary time. And the problem here is that these are not elected officials. Bill Gates was not elected. The World Economic Forum, they're not elected. And therefore, they're basically unaccountable. And, of course, they do have this desire. Not only, you know, it gets to the point, I think, when they have so much money that it really becomes more about power.

And as you point out, more about control. It is, the money kind of loses, you kind of keep score with the money, but that's not really what these guys are after at this point in time, you know, a normal person, you get a couple of billion dollars, you just kind of relax and enjoy life or something. But these people are driven, you know, no matter how much money they've got, they've got to have more. It's like an addiction that they have, but it's that, that essentially served their desire, I think for power.

And so I think that's why, you know, you their desire, I think, for power. And so I think that's why you really nailed it with the control agarics. That is what they're fundamentally looking for. When you look at how they are putting this together and how it is kind of a public-private partnership and a stakeholder thing, I've said in the past that, you know, we see these agendas coming out of places like, you know, the UN or the World Economic Forum, Davos or Bilderberg or whatever. They're putting together these agendas and everything. But they need to have money because right now they don't have a way to tax people globally. They're working on that with the carbon taxes and things. But, you know, if you're going to have a world governance, you're going to have to have a kind of public-private partnership at this point in time. And so these people are really,

I think, kind of what's hidden in their stakeholder aspect that, you know, if I get a stake in the future world government by helping you to fund this and helping to implement this, I'm going to make money off of it, but the payoff is going to come down the line. Is that the way you see it when you look at this? Because you're looking at this in a lot more depth. Yeah, that's absolutely right. I mean, a lot of people ask me, well, aren't these guys capitalists? And what problem do you have with capitalism? And I would say none. But these are not really capitalists like we think of capitalism. It's a totally different thing. Klaus Schwab calls it stakeholder

capitalism. And the funny thing about, you know, when you read Klaus Schwab's writings on stakeholder capitalism, one of the key stakeholders, you don't often see him mentioned are the people it's all, you know, it's NGOs and business leaders and, uh, you know, government officials, but yeah, it's the public private partnership model, which sounds rather benign. Um yeah it's the public private partnership model which sounds rather benign it's really not though because the public doesn't get a say in any of it and as far as money and capitalization i mean we followed the money we crunched you know all you know all the figures of the foundations and found that there's more than 10 trillion dollars just in the top 25 of hundreds world economic forum members this is the largest corporations in the world yeah yeah it truly is amazing you talk about the war on farmers and you said you know a lot of people

think that uh misconstrue what uh gates's um motives are in this how do you see the war on farmers well i see the war on farmers like a lot of these other industries too which is it's about patents and it's about the control of intellectual property if you think of food like uh like a you know a pharmaceutical product where the name brand drug comes out it's very expensive 80 let's say 80 dollars a pill uh whereas then it goes generic well a patent grants you a 20-year monopoly. It's the same thing with food. They are patenting the seeds. They are patenting the protein chains of these products like Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods. And so once you've secured the patents on the alternative proteins, then you move to ban the competition, which is the generic, which is cattle. And so when, when let's say Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez representative,

uh, Cortez, when she says the earth is going to end in 12 years because cow flatulence, she didn't just dream that up somewhere. It was, uh, it came out of a white paper from, let's say an organization like the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. Yeah. Yeah. I call her occasional cortex occasionally, occasionally she gets it right, but not, not too often. Uh, but, uh, yeah, it is, uh, it is a strategy to, um, you know, come up with something that is new and novel and then to get them to ban what is currently working. And we see that everywhere. I mean, just take a look at cars in general. You know, uh, when you look at what is happening in the EV industry, clearly customers are not there.

They're not on board with this stuff. They don't want it. It's really being shoved down people's throats. And the government is going to aid them by banning it. But these people are playing the long game. They don't even call themselves car companies anymore. They call themselves mobility companies because they're looking to get into that franchise that's, that's down the road. And so it, that is, that's a pattern that you see as well, right? With, uh, with Gates and these other people that they're working on having some kind of a,

you know, quasi, uh, oligarchy where they're going to, uh, uh, own transportation or they're going to own food or pharmaceuticals or whatever. And they're going to continue to maintain their ownership of everything. And we all become renters, right? That is the end goal, as stated at the World Economic Forum. And they state it quite joyfully is that you will own nothing and you will be happy. And what that really means is, yes, exactly like you they you know a nation a world of renters um i kind of describe it as like putting a paywall around your life or making life subscription based you see this with vehicles right now i mean uh bm bmw and uh mercedes have now made features on their cars you know the best automobile makers the germans have made certain features like if

you would like to have the safety assist or if you want to have heated seats in your vehicle you got to pay 10 bucks a month um so and you kind of see it with more and more products i mean subscription everything's becoming subscription based yeah there was actually a babble and b thing where they were joking about signing up for pfizer plus know, instead of Disney Plus, where you can get your boosters on a monthly basis. They keep injecting it. Yeah, everybody's got a plus. So, you know, when you look at this,

one of the things you say is the left's rise is no accident. How do you see the left's role in this? I just talked on Friday to Xi Van Fleet, who talked about growing up in Mao's China, and she's freaked out about how she sees Marxism being implemented exactly the same way that it was when she was a child in school, and the school's acting the same ways. Of course, the substances of it is different, but it is still working the same way. And so she looks at it and she says,

well, I don't really want to call these people woke. I mean, it is Marxism, but actually, you know, in, in Marxism, they were talking about an awakening, you know, in China, that's actually the term that they use. So in a sense, they're using even the woke term is something that they borrowed from the Chinese, but, but how do you see this in terms of the, the rise of the left? And, and I guess, you know, maybe even the march through the institutions. Yeah, that's exactly right. I hadn't heard about that with the woke.

That's very interesting. So, I mean, everybody has heard of George Soros, a perennial boogeyman. But he, I mean, as you see, he's funding these radical left groups. I mean, even these pro-Hamas, you know, pro-Hamas groups, George Soros funded, I think, $23 million to those. But it goes back to the 50s and 60s. And there was actually a FBI, former FBI agent published, you may have seen this, the Communist Party's Global Goals. And there's about 50 goals. And I published those in the book. And you read read through those and it's just shocking to see how many of those goals have really come to fruition and so you see along the way these these left-wing groups that have been funded they're actually funded by elite

wealthy interests i mean george soros of course but then you see i mean like the blm movement and that gets big funding from amazon you see it a lot in the LGBT movement. There's these corporate interests that are fighting, which seems counterintuitive, right? Because. Marxism, you know, you would think a capitalist corporation would not be in favor of it. Um, but time and again, you know, you follow the money and there they are.

So, so what do you think of that? You know, what do you think of these people who are seem to be capitalist and yet they're hardcore Marxists. And, and, and as you point out, they're funding these organizations that have a Marxist agenda in that, you know,

what, what is really going on? Is this just a bait and switch? And how did they get into this position? How do we wind up having all these people with all the money? If you're following the money, how'd they get all the money and control of all our institutions so they could destroy them? Well, and this is this alliance of the the state and with the corporations just like you see

in china the the state-run capitalism model is the model that the guys in silicon valley they really like that model uh klaus schwab and the world economic forum actually had a great hand in creating that model going back to the 70s. And the World Economic Forum economists were going into China before Deng Xiaoping and teaching them the benefits of capitalism. But Klaus Schwab says the state-run model where you actually have this sort of autocratic authoritarian uh element to it where you can you know that you see when bill gates praises china's lockdowns on you know during covid um i i do see you know countless there are countless examples of where let's say mark

zuckerberg he keeps xi jinping's writings on his desk so they sort of have this lust for the chinese model and uh that's it's the marriage of uh and that is really what stakeholder capitalism what claude schwab calls stakeholder capitalism is it's a merger of the corporate interest i mean mussolini i believe called it fascism when the corporate corporations in the state are merged but that's that's what they're working towards and it has been that way. If you want to do business in China, you've got to have a Chinese partner, which is going to be somebody that's going to be a high-ranking official or more in the Chinese Communist Party.

And so it really is a form of fascism, of economic and political merging that is there. And so this was so confusing to a lot of people. They have these categories that they want to put everything into, and they've got to shuffle this around. You know, the Chinese Communist Party is really fascist. They have this economic fascism. They're also hyper-nationalist as well. And then there's these capitalists that we have in America who are Marxist in their orientation. But we can see that ultimately, you know, we need to start rethinking what our political map is and start just referring to these people as totalitarians, I think, right?

Yeah, or control-a-darks. Yeah, control-a-darks. That's exactly what it is. It's all about control. They love the efficiency of being able to, let's say, stifle dissent and just cancel you. Yeah. And we have seen that, as you point out. Zuckerberg's got the, you know, the writings. As we've seen these politicians, we've seen everybody from George W. Bush to Trudeau saying,

I wish I could be like the Chinese leader and just tell people what to do. And it's just this totalitarian urge that they have. A few years ago, I remember, I think it was Newsweek or Time, they did a cover of Zuckerberg who is just infatuated with Caesar Augustus. And even, I think, named his daughter Augustus or something. But, you know, he's got this desire to rule the world. He already tried doing it with his white paper for Libra. He was going to say, Hey, let me do the CBDC for the world. And it'll be a de facto global ID for you. How about that?

And they rejected that because they're going to roll their own, but all that rolls together, we talk about following the money, that's really, we're ultimately going with all this stuff. It all really does converge with financial controls and it convergesges with CBDC and universal basic income, doesn't it? Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, on Zuckerberg and just the tech oligarchs in general, I believe the professor at MIT's name is Joseph Wiesenbaum. He lays out why these guys have sort of a God complex on steroids. It's because the tech developers and the computer programmers, they construct these worlds of,

you know, digital worlds. And so when they turn the dials in their digital worlds, uh, all of the moving parts do what they want them, you know, what the designer wants them to. And so they try to,

you know, bring that ability into the real world. And they think if they can turn the right dials, they can fix, uh, they can fix humanity. David, you may not think you have any problems that need fixing, but they do. You've got a lot of big problems that they need to fix. And so on the CBDC front, I mean, yeah, that's another one where I thought, you know, that some of the things I'm reading about this sound sort of conspiratorial. What do you mean they can just turn off your money? But indeed, the World Economic Forum was one of the leaders in promoting CBDCs. I mean, the central banks are fully behind it. The Bank of International

Settlements has had meetings on how to bring these about. Just week the atlantic council said that the moment the quote momentum behind cbdc's remains strong and so uh they're they're planning to roll that out also last week bill gates in the united nations hosted an event that was titled 50 in 50 50 countries within five years will have digital id according to the UN and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation who co-sponsored the event. So there's, it's full steam ahead on CBDC and digital ID. And once linked, I mean, all of your transactions much more closely can be tracked and traced. I mean, the abolition of cash, you see a lot of countries in Europe are becoming increasingly, increasingly cashless. I mean, even we in America, our resistance to going cashless has about halved in 20 years. Yes, yes, yeah.

And part of that is the convenience and the comfort. Just make it easier for people to pay electronically or tap and go and that type of thing. And they just had Australia just went down. uh, their tap and go system went down because the telecom company went down and nobody had cash. And so it's like, what do we do now? I mean, it's, uh, you know, it really does create a control point. I remember when the CEO of Uber proudly showed to a member of the press, he said, this is our God view.

And, and they could look at where all of the different Uber things were happening, but he called it his God view. And that really is the way they see themselves as in complete control, the control of Garks. And then of course, there's also the trends humanist and other aspects of this. These guys really do think that their technology is not only going to provide endless material goods for us, but they think it's going to provide a way for them to live forever, don't they as well? Did you get into any of that? I know that's not really necessarily in the line of the money stuff, but this whole idea,

Peter Thiel with the singularity and Elon Musk and his Neuralink and all the rest of this stuff, I mean, they're moving into merging with machines and they think that's going to let them live forever. That's another part of their God complex, I think. Yeah, exactly right. It's in Chapter 9, the dystopian present that we've got Peter Thiel. Of course, we've got Elon Musk with Neuralink. And you're right.

I mean, I don't state it as explicitly, but what it really is is they want to live forever. And that's the thing is the one thing that unites us. I mean, what could you, you know, what could any of us have in common with someone with a net worth of $200 billion? Um, but we said, we're all going to die. And I think that scares people, uh, that scares the billionaires and they really hope that, uh, they, and they, they state it. They truly believe that in their lifetimes we'll be able to live forever. Elon Musk has claimed he's uploaded his brain to the cloud. I mean, I'm not sure if that's possible,

but he and Peter Thiel and Jeff Bezos is a big funder of life extension technologies. They always come up with these nice little euphemisms for it, but they're seeking immortality. It's kind of interesting. We always hear there's only two things that are inevitable, death and taxes. But of course, these guys have already beat taxes. So I guess they can beat death as well, right? I'm borrowing that, David. That is perfect. Exactly. So, you know, when they look at this again, they get, you know, instead of getting taxed, they get subsidized because they're doing what the government wants to do. It's kind of this symbiotic relationship between these two groups of parasites, the controlling arcs and the government.

And, you know, they're feeding each other, but they're feeding off of us. When you look at this and, you know, we've had these guys literally talk about us being a virus. Talk a little bit about the disdain that they have for the average person that you notice in this. I mean, they really do. We've seen this in the Gaia theory where they say, you know, Mother Earth, Gaia, is this wonderful thing that happened by accident and humans are a virus and we've got to be controlled or even eliminated I mean how much of this is is that kind of um you know you talk about the eugenics race and everything but I mean is there still at the core of this this this kind of depopulation um uh move uh kind of a hatred of mankind that is fundamentally there because they see us as

less than them, but still a threat to them. What do you think? 100%. The whole relationship with, I'm not, you know, if you're familiar with the Club of Rome, the Club of Rome was really the precursor organization to the World Economic Forum. Yes. It was, you you know the same members and it all came around i mean you mentioned paul ehrlich and the population bomb this sounds like it's ain't you know ancient history back in the 60s but uh yes the limits the limits to growth which is the book that was put out by the club of rome it gets an update approximately every 10

years where they rejigger the algorithms in the computer and uh we're still going to end in 20 years it's always 20 years away the earth is going to end um and i mean i think there was uh just last year an update to the limits to growth even though and i laid this out in the book the limits to growth was completely debunked just like paul ehrlich's population bomb was completely debunked decades ago yeah um the ma the modeling was totally faulty um and but but anyway the whole point of limits to growth was to say yes the earth is overpopulated a subsequent club of rome report came out and it was called the predicament of mankind and it essentially found that uh the uh all that we, the elites around the world, we need a common cause. Countries need a common cause to unite around.

And the problem with the world is humanity itself. So they are anti-human. Not themselves, of course, just all of the people sharing their air. And I opened the book in chapter one with this meeting of the Good Club. It was in May 2009. It was convened by Bill Gates, George Soros, David Rockefeller at Rockefeller University in Manhattan. Oprah Winfrey was there. Ted Turner was there. And approximately 15 billionaires got together. And the context for this meeting is Barack Obama has just been elected president. They all spent great amounts of money

to get him there. And so they have this meeting May 2009 and say, we need a common cause for which we, the more or less most powerful people in the country can pool our resources and this really precedes all of the climate change hysteria that you see today and bill gates suggests that the umbrella cause that of you know under which they can all pool their resources is overpopulation so 60 years later they they i mean and you hear bill gates talk about it quite regularly that the population on planet earth is way too big now i do give elon musk some credit i mean he's in there for some of the creepy technocratic uh neuralink ambitions but i do give him credit he's one of the very few people elites uh you know billionaire hundred billionaires out there who says that actually no the earth is not overpopulated and the one

resource that they always whether it's the limits to growth or paul erlich and the population bomb the one resource that they fail to take into account is human ingenuity um we're not running out of resources we always find a new way to get you know gather resources but we don't have a we'll never have a water problem on planet earth we just have a salt problem as people have said and they found ways to desalinize the ocean um oils the peak oil was debunked 40 50 years ago um they're now putting carbon scrubbers i mean trees breathe carbon so i'm i'm a little confused at like what's the what's the level of carbon that's too much if the trees and plants breathe carbon?

But nonetheless, human ingenuity has come up with carbon scrubbers that are sucking the CO2 out of the atmosphere and cleaning things up. So that almost looks like they're terraforming us, you know, taking the CO2 out. But now they've flipped completely around and said, no, we've got to cut the trees down after saying you've got to pay me to plant trees. Now we're going to cut the trees down and we're going to bury them. You can't even make wood out of them or anything. We're going to just bury them in the ground. And it reminds me very much of what I remember the first Earth Day. And they were telling everybody we were going to have a new ice age.

And then all of a sudden, within eight years, it just flipped the script completely and it was going to be global warming now they're flipping the script on trees and co2 it's absolutely insane and yet they continually get away with it because they control the institutions the government is showering them with cash and all the rest of this stuff it truly is amazing how they can continue to keep running and keep reinventing these lies in completely opposite directions. It really is. And that comes down to the media control and the education control. I mean, there's a chapter on each and the media is controlled by just six corporations. It's very hard. I mean, it's getting better now. There's podcasts and shows out there and shows like yours are great sources of information that is not controlled and free thinkers and independent journalists such as myself putting out the research.

But they're struggling and working very hard to make sure that unapproved narratives are not allowed to get out there. So, you know, that's where the disinformation, I mean, nobody had ever heard the word disinformation five ten years ago and now it's everywhere and same thing with hate speech um and so there's that and then the the control of the education i mean the bill and melinda gates foundation really started as the gates learning center and they want to get laptops in the hands of every child and some of the software programs that are programming the brains of your children. You should be very careful what the schools are putting into your kids' heads. I think that's become a big issue that people recognize. And so that information control is actually, in my opinion, probably the scariest one is

like we need to have the free flow of information. And I see them being more involved even in education than even in the media. I mean, what do you think about that? It's such a huge footprint that they have in education. It seems to be even bigger than it is in the media. I see the footprint of the pharmaceutical industry, for example, and all the commercials that they run. But, you know, when you look at Gates and the rest of these people, it seems like it's

education where they're more focused on because that's where they get the kids so afraid of, you know, the world's going to end tomorrow, that type of thing, or 20 years. Right, right. I mean, that's absolutely right. I mean, you know, there's all of the communist dictators said, you know, you get to the kids first and that's what we see happening in our school systems and a lot of parents and they are alienated from their children based on what their children are learning in schools and their kids you know their kids are coming home and woke and calling their parents racist when they're not or whatever you know whatever the case may be and uh it's a big problem i mean we've probably lost a generation or two but it also I'm encouraged that the younger generations are resisting the top-down.

That's one thing kids are always good at, is being rebellious. Once they become the establishment, then they've got a problem, right? You've looked at this and you've followed the money, and you see how these guys have gotten all the money. The control-a-garks are controlling all the money for the most garks are controlling all the money for the most part especially with the government so you know what is the how do we end this let's not talk about what the end game of their plans are do you have any suggestions for what we do to end this control of garkey you know how do we get when they've got the money and they've

got the political power so what do we do about it yeah that's right i got to the end of the researching and the writing for this and i was like boy this is the hardest thing to write is going to be the recommendations i mean we're up against trillions of dollars here but uh you know in five words or so i'd say do not comply is the first three when they come and try to force things upon you and you know with the the mandates and whatnot but the second is uh buying local i mean it seems very small it's very hard to i mean local um can can seem like it's daunting or uh buying local is is it more expensive but i've found local farms uh that actually it's cheaper to get meat in bulk you know i've got a a freezer uh that you know you can buy local meats because

you don't know what, when they're going to start putting the fake meats in the grocery store. I mean, they're already there with the beyond meats and such. But you got to jealously guard your wallet. You've got to not be giving money in the form of subscriptions. It's easier said than done, of course. But then also you got to take an active interest and active role in your child's education and upbringing. You know, I don't think we're going to defeat the control of darks, you know, this year, next year even. But it's going to be a long slog. And you got to take an active role in your child's education.

I agree. Yeah, because it is the hearts and the minds. And that's really where the battle is going to be won or lost. And it's also going to be in the local communities for all my life. As I said earlier in the show, I always heard, you know, think globally and act locally. That was always the left's mantra. We need to understand what these people are doing globally. That's what your book covers. You know, what are these people up to? Where are they right now? What is their ultimate goal and plan? And then I think we need to understand that we have to act locally as

well and we have to act locally to counter act what that global plan is but it helps to know what their plan is it helps to know what their battle plan is i mean what what an advantage that is to have the enemy's battle plans in your hands and that's really what your book does it really tells people what the battle plan is and so we you, even if you know what their plan is, it's still going to be difficult to defeat it. But it's going to be a lot easier to defeat it if you know what their tactics and their strategies and ultimate goals are. And I think that's the key thing that your book brings to the table here is to show what these people have done and where they're headed. And it's important for this to get out to a lot of people because you point out we talk to people about cbdc they don't really care but if you if you tell them uh here's what it's going to mean yeah here's the different things that they're going to enact with

cbdc then everybody hates it you know if you just go out and do a poll and say what do you think about cbdc what if the federal reserve were to do this and that oh that's no problem but then you actually talk about how it works in their everyday life, and they really hate it. So that's the key thing is to educate people. And that's a part of it is having the hearts and minds. So today your book is released today. Is that correct? That is correct.

You're my first interview of the day. Wow. That's great. I'm honored. Thank you so much for coming on. And it's really. I'm honored. Thank you so much for coming on. And, uh, it's, it's really exciting to see that. Uh, I've been seeing the articles on Breitbart about controlling arcs and, um, uh, it's, it's, uh, very important to understand where these people are coming from.

Uh, thank you so much. And, uh, again, best place to anywhere to get it. We can get it on Amazon and buy it from one of the controlling arcss i know it it's a it's a big problem that amazon is i mean i feel i feel terrible that it's sold on amazon as i'm out there saying no cancel your amazon subscription you can go to control of darks book.com i've got books of millions link there i've got uh barnes and noble there's uh some local books stores i mean you it's it's getting tougher and tougher not to buy things on Amazon. They're monopoly. And that's one of the reasons I wrote the book is their monopoly is a big problem.

So buy it anywhere you can. Yeah. Yeah, that's the thing. You know, our choices are really getting very narrowly constricted here. And it really went into steroids when we had the lockdown in 2020, we had so many mom and pop stores. If they hadn't already been taken down by Wall Street and an oligarchy of two or three competitors that are funded off of Wall Street, then that pandemic locking them down, that was really kind of the final nail in the coffin for a lot of small businesses. But yeah, you're right. We're going to continue to see this narrow down if we can't start to think and act at a local area.

So it's great. Thank you so much. Again, the book is Controligarchs. And we're talking to Seamus Bruner, who is the author of that. And a long history of Peter Weitzer doing deep dives on Hillary Clinton and her finances. And that really is the key to look at where the money is. So thank you so much for what you do. It was great talking to you.

Thank you. Thank you so much, David. It was a real pleasure. Thank you. Thank you. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.

Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean trust the science. Wear your mask.

Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It's The David Knight Show.