The David Knight Show - INTERVIEW Global Bureaucracy Targets "Freedom, Dignity"

Episode Date: January 20, 2023

James Roguski, jamesroguski.substack.com. It's right there in print — removing dignity and freedom, extending the medical martial law permanently and doing it at the global level through WHO. What they're planning and how to stop itFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here:SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation through Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At LiveScoreBet, we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. is total betting. Sign up by 2 p.m. 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race.

Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie. All right, joining us now is James Roguski. He's been very busy, but we would have had him on earlier, except I messed up some of the communications. I'm really glad to finally get him back on.

And thank you for joining us, James. Oh, it is a pleasure. Just tell me where you want to start, Dave. Let's start with what I talked about earlier today, which is the lawsuit from Oklahoma and Texas about trying to get this order that was put in by HHS in January of 2020. But they go back to 2017, where the HHS official, which is the guy that Trump put in was CEO of Eli Lilly. He was the one who said, we're going to tie this to the World Health Organization. And they're saying, you can't do that.

But I know that it's getting much worse right now, what's going on in Geneva. But let's begin with that, going back to what they're trying to get removed, even as World Health Organization is trying to escalate this. I didn't see your previous segment because it just came on now. And so I believe I know which lawsuit it is you're talking about. And so my history with that is back in May of last year, when I was digging into what the Biden administration had proposed about a year ago, they submitted proposed amendments to the international health regulations on January 18th, 2022. And so as I was digging into that, I found myself in the federal register looking at

CDC final rulings, and they changed many things, okay? And it had to do with travel and, you know, containment and quarantine and all that sort of thing. And one of the words that they changed was the definition of invasive, an invasive test. And in the international health regulations, it's defined as, you know, if someone wants to stick something into an orifice of your body to do a test, rightfully, that's called invasive. Well, the CDC changed that definition in a very confusing way. So anybody who reads it, their head's just going to fall apart. But they basically made it so that the government had the right to tell you that they were allowed to stick something up your nose.

The other thing that they changed. Let me just jump in here for a second. Because when they had the Cannes Film Festival and they were requiring these PCR tests of the people who were attending it and they complained, they said, this is so disgusting. I have to spit into this thing. It's like, oh, wait a minute. They're ramming rods up people's noses everywhere else. And of course you could just spit into something and they could do it. To me, it just showed that it was pure harassment. But also, as you pointed out, they're laying the foundation for this stuff. This was planned. Every bit of it was planned years in advance.

And, of course, they've been practicing the overall scheme for over 20 years, going back to Dark Winter in 2001. But it shows how planned this was. And the details are being implemented through all these different administrations, including the Trump administration. Are you still there? Did we lose James? Hey, James, can you hear me?

I think we lost James. See if you can reestablish contact with him. Okay, so we're going to talk about it. It is really amazing what is happening and james has done a deep dive on all this stuff for a year and a half and i was glad to see that a lot of media outlets have picked up his stuff quoting him as a matter of fact children's health defense fund picked him up vaccine impact.com picked him up a lot of different places are have done i've picked him up because he's done a lot of deep dive research on this and really knows this.

So we're going to reestablish contact with him, hopefully. And Travis is working on that. Let me continue while we're waiting with that. Let's talk about what else was happening at Davos. We have Gretchen Whitmer telling a forum there that Michigan's radical new abortion law, she said, gives me hope. You know, they want to forfeit everything. They want us to forfeit our lives as well. Her state's enactment of a pro-abortion constitutional amendment is one of the things that gives her hope for women's representation in the future.

The subject was creating better pathways to advance more women into the highest levels of leadership. But wait a minute. Half of the babies that you're killing are women, right? We had a midterm election, she said, in Michigan where I won re-election. And we passed a constitutional amendment to protect infanticide. Now, she calls it reproductive rights. The Michigan Constitution enshrined a right to abortion care and to some other things as well.

Sterilization. You have a right to sterilization. Was that anything that was under challenge? Who would be trying to stop somebody from being sterilized? Would that be parents trying to stop their kids from being sterilized with chemical castration or surgical means? But the abortion thing had a list of different things. You know, prenatal care, yeah. We've got a right to prenatal care. A right to childbirth. A right to childbirth.

But as people start looking at this, it's like, oh, yeah, sure, yeah, we want to have a right to childbirth. Well, these looking at this it's like oh yeah sure yeah we want to have rights a right to childbirth well these people don't want you to have children but they listed nine different things and abortion was six out of nine pretty far down the list maybe i'm sure that people knew that they were voting for abortion that's where our society is right now so she said this these are things that we're going to grant to individuals. And you have the Human Rights Watch, people who are pushing LGBT agenda. The director there is lashing out at Poland and Hungary, speaking again at the World Economic Forfeiture Group,

possibly the same one that Gretchen was in. She's angry because Poland and Hungary are championing family values. She slammed the pro-family policies of Poland and Hungary. She said they are divisive. They increase acts of violence and discrimination. Well, if you support traditional values, traditional marriage, you want to support families. Well, that's not only divisive, but it's also pushes violence. So I guess

that entitles them to get violent with people who have traditional families all right james is back uh james can you hear me i certainly can i hope you can hear and see me as well um yeah i've uh switched over to my phone okay good good i don't know what happened okay we're good now oh i moved to a third world country here in los angeles and the internet has been very sketchy. Okay, good. Well, not good, but I'm glad that we're back. Anyway, let's put it that way. So we were talking about your research, how you found last summer they had redefined the term invasive to, in advance, give them the privilege of sticking stuff up your nose right and so that was one of them but the

other one which um really what the lawsuit is all about that if we're talking about the same thing the um cdc changed the definition of a public health emergency which is declared by what is essentially dictator for life um the Secretary of Health and Human Services, whoever may be holding that office. There's no shutoff by the legislature or the people when the Secretary of Health and Human Services declares a public health emergency. There is supposed to be a shutoff off meaning congress has failed miserably over the course of the past three years because they are obligated to vote every six months to tell the president whether or not they have congressional authority or approval to continue the national emergency okay the public

health emergency is a separate declaration and that's made by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and that just goes on indefinitely they just keep re-upping it every 90 days there's no legislative way of turning it off and that is just a flaw in the law. And what they did with the CDC ruling that they're arguing is that they defined the criteria by which the Department of Health and Human Services could declare a public health emergency in the United States. And they added a couple of definitions so that essentially, if the WHO, for whatever reason, says, oh, we've got an emergency, that's all the justification that Department of Health and Human Services need. Okay. Well, as you saw with Moneypox, please remember that the K is silent, the who um you know the the director general ignored

and now granted it's an advisory committee but his advisory committee voted i believe nine to six against declaring a public health emergency of international concern which is abbreviated fake fake, E-H-E-I-C. So he declared a fake, and that was all the justification, no data, no science, no research, no anything. That was all Javier Becerra needed by the regulations to declare in the United States a public health emergency. And those changes were made on the very last day of the Obama full day of the Obama administration January 19th 2017. so Trump walked into office those changes had just been made you know maybe somebody paid attention maybe somebody didn't and and so you know here we are now um with with 46 pages of proposed amendments from 16 countries who are speaking on behalf of numerous additional countries

like the Czech Republic submitted proposed amendments on behalf of the European Union. So there's 27 nations. David, I'm gonna challenge your geography here. S. Wetini in Africa used to be Swaziland, submitted on behalf of the 47 member nations of the region in the WHO from Africa. Uruguay submitted for five countries in south america uh russia submitted

for five countries in their european union or i'm sorry their economic union and and so there are all of these competing proposals and here's what i um see going on here um different nations have obviously different views they've all submitted their various proposals. It's a bunch of, you know, not even English. It's just legalese gobbledygook. I did what I could to translate that into English. And over my Christmas vacation, I didn't really have a vacation over my Christmas holidays. I made an hour and a half movie so that people could see the 100 reasons why everybody should stop the treaty, stop the amendments, and exit the WHO. You can just go to jamesroguski.substack.com, and it's the article called 100 Reasons. Good. Let's spell your name, R-O-G-U-S-K-I. So James Roguski, it's Substack. Yeah. Important. And so there are some fundamental things that I just saw an article today from the Spectator in Australia.

I'm working with people all over the world. There's a strong group of people in Australia who have already gotten some senators on board. They took one look at this and, you know, boom, they jumped in. They've made some videos. they've made some statements they've published you know their their um piece on it and the media immediately mangled it okay and so you know that as expected let me just be very very clear if anybody says the word treaty they're talking about something that i think is a decoy right the quote-unquote pandemic treaty is a real thing it is of great concern it's a horror story but it's not what we're going to be talking about today it's really it's not it's really the rules

right that are the basis of that right the um The thing that we're talking about today that is of great concern because they're doing everything they can to keep it secret is proposed amendments to existing international law, which they call the international health regulations. But I tend to not refer to them because they're not about health. If they were called the international surveillance and monitoring and reporting and emergency declaring fear-mongering regulations, then everybody would understand what we're really talking about. They do not talk about health. They do not talk about early treatment or any such thing. What they talk about is how do you track and trace people? They want to set up what they call a digital health certificate. passport, but it also has a testing certificate, a prophylaxis or prevention certificate, a vaccine certificate, a recovery certificate. They want to have passenger locator forms. You know, it's a digital gulag.

You know, it's just an absolute clear violation of something that most Americans don't really think about too much. It's a good old Fourth Amendment, Dave. Remember that one? Everybody knows the first and the second. It's amazing to see these guys as they talk about their vision of the future, this digital dystopia. Everything is about surveillance and control and tracking and identification and inventory and all the rest of stuff it is their vision for the future every single one of these global leaders these politicians as well as multinational corporations they all have the same vision of putting us in a prison just that simple um i've had some internet trouble so um i haven't published and i hope to get it out the door today um reject digital

enslavement.com good and so what um what they're trying to do is exactly what you said and the quiet part was spoken out loud at live score bet we love cheltenham just as much as we love football the excitement the roar and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScore Bet.

This is total betting. Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie This is Total Betting. very proud to have submitted proposed amendments and all about the digital health certificate and he um he clearly said that they want to have this be adopted in the 2023 world health assembly which is a less than four months away it's well just about four months away, May 21st. And so to be fair, and I can already see the deception coming, to be fair, the WHO, in all of their official documents, has said that they do not intend to change any international law until 2024. They're negotiating on two separate documents. One is the treaty, which we're not talking about right now. We can talk about that at some other point. And the second one is

the more troublesome one, which are amendments, proposed amendments to the international health regulations. Now, he said he wants that to happen in 2023. And I expected that. And it makes sense because the international health regulations really are the international surveillance, monitoring, reporting. That's where that information is in international law. And so what I've been screaming about all year long is that the WHO created an International Health Regulations Review Committee, which hijacked what was supposed to be... Oh, he just went down in the middle of a statement.

It looks to me... Oh, we're trying to reestablish contact with him. Is he back? Sounded like it came back up again. Anyway, the... I do believe I'm here, if you can hear me. Yes, you're back. You're back. Somehow, just we heard the...

Okay, and so the Director General of the who created a private review committee it only answers to him they've they've let it be known that they exist and who's on it and you know all of the people who are associated with it they're not representatives they're not diplomats they do not represent you know the united states or any of the other countries they only are there to serve in their you know know, quote unquote, expert capacity. And they report directly to Tedros and they were sworn to confidentiality. Now, they met six times from October until now. And the last meeting was from January 9th to the 13th. And on Sunday, the 15th, apparently, they said that they were going to submit the final version of

the proposed amendments to the director general the re the only reason for rushing that the only reason for doing that was there's a four month requirement that it has to be submitted in advance four months before the May 21st assembly and And so they gave it to Tedros on Sunday, according to their documents. I have not yet seen it published anywhere. The way they do this is, well, you know, one day they get around to putting it up on their website and I just have to keep checking back every day. And last year, when the Biden administration submitted it on January 18th, it was completely hidden until April 12th. I found it in March on one blogger who had revealed it,

but officially it never appeared on the Biden website and it didn't appear on the WHO website until April. And so we made a big stink about it and it was stopped but it wasn't stopped for the reasons that everybody thinks they are so go ahead dave ask me what the real reason what are the real reasons for stopping it yeah and what was the reason that they gave for stopping it and and um and go ahead what happened what happened was that Biden administration, which we came to find out in May, I published an article called Seeking Clarification on my sub stack and got thousands of people to send emails to Congress. And some of the Congress people and senators replied and some of the people who got those replies forwarded them to me, and I collected them in an article. And it really wasn't a surprise, but it was a surprise at how

proud the people were that it was actually all of these amendments were begun under the Trump administration. And so the minority report from the Republican Party is what started this attempt to strengthen the WHO and ultimately is heading towards giving over sovereignty and human rights to the WHO. And they were proudly proclaiming that. Well, I'm really glad I downloaded the document because it's gone from the government website now, but it's still on my sub stack. They essentially wanted to give more power to the WHO. Which is exactly the opposite of what they've told their base. At LiveScoreBet,

we love Cheltenham just as much as we love football. The excitement, the roar, and the chance to reward you. That's why every day of the festival, we're giving new members money back as a free sports bet up to €10 if your horse loses on a selected race. That's how we celebrate the biggest week in racing. Cheltenham with LiveScoreBet. This is total betting.

Sign up by 2pm 14th of March. Bet within 48 hours of race. Main market excluding specials and place bets. Terms apply. Bet responsibly. 18plusgamblingcare.ie What happened was they must have some kind of introductory course for new congresspeople on how to condescend to your constituency.

Because the people were informed. They read the documents, they knew what was going on. They sent letters to their Congress, congressional representatives, and the answers were abominable, right? And so the people pushed back, and then what we noticed, and what I could surmise happened is the Congress people, who had no idea

really what the heck was going on, went to leadership and they said, what do we tell our constituents? They're smarter than we are. And so the form letters started coming down from above of how the congressional representatives should push back against the constituency. David Taubermanis And David, I learned in civics that the representatives were not our bosses they didn't tell us what we wanted we tell them how they are supposed to represent us and quite frankly that is the core of the problem and here we are in the middle of the show and i'm going to get to the punchline, okay, or the soundbite that, you know, everybody really needs to know about this. One of the amendments that has been proposed by, of all

places, the delegation from the nation of India. When I first read the international health regulations a year ago, and I have to give everybody, you know, I cut everybody all the slack in the world. year ago i had no idea that these things even existed okay and so when i first read them i got to article three and article three in the international health regulations are the core principles by which they were originally enacted and it says very clearly that they must be implemented with the full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of people. And the Indian delegation proposed crossing that out. And when I read the amendments back in December when they were first made available, this round of them, I literally saw myself with my jaw hanging open and I'm like Jim

your jaw is hanging open and it's like did I just read what I just read because it's right there you know in the document um with respect for the dignity human rights and fundamental freedoms of people has a strike through line going right through it and I'm an optimist and you know the saying, if somebody gives you lemons, make lemonade. I'm like, this is so absolutely horrible that it's actually a blessing. Because if anyone in the planet, let alone people in the United States, can look at that and go, yeah, that sounds like a good idea. You're dealing with somebody who is living in a different world. Yeah. Because that just sets the stage for what the rest of the amendments would do.

They should have called it the B.F. Skinner Amendment, you know, beyond freedom and dignity. Because that's really where we've been for the last several years. You know, they want to strip us of our freedom and our dignity and track us like animals that's what this is all really about and they just put it right there out in the open and and so arguably okay and i think unarguably but i'll be uh you know i'll go easy on it um this is the founding document of the one world government and it starts in article one where they would change

two definitions okay the definitions are a standing recommendation made by the who and a temporary recommendation made by the who now currently the definition says non-binding advice right and so when you give a recommendation um you don't it's not an obligation it's not an order it's not a command people give recommendations all the time oh you should do this you should do that you should do the other thing and you're free to follow that advice if it's good advice or to not well the proposed amendments would cross out the phrase non-binding. So now the double negative, you remove non-binding. In Article 43, they changed one word, should, to shall. It's like, well, wait a minute.

If you shall obey the recommendations, but the recommendations are now binding, that's an order. That's a shift of sovereignty. That's a shift of sovereignty. That's a shift of control. And when you read what's going on in Article 15, Article 16, Article 18, what were recommendations? Because the WHO is primarily an advisory body. They collect information. They share that information with the nation and and it's it's advice it's a recommendation they said in July very clearly and it was really interesting how they did it they had two days worth of public meeting that were um live streamed and then all of a sudden they disappeared for two days they all went into quiet meetings and then they came back on thursday and they said

um well you know we're so very transparent that we're going to tell you what we decided in the two days that we were in hiding okay and what and what they decided was that yes we all agreed that it should be a legally binding document okay and so what they want to do is change their advisory, you know, recommendation capacity and essentially be the king of the world and be able to boss everyone around. Article number two, change the scope of the regulations from actual emergencies. Okay. You know, there certainly are times when there is a problem and people need to be alerted about it. You know, forest fire is coming or hurricane or something like that. Right.

But they changed the definition and they changed the scope of the regulations to include anything that has the potential to be an emergency. Yeah, that's right. And you just go, well, wait a minute. And that's kind of what happened with our lockdown. You know, oh, it's an emergency. Yeah, that's right. And you just go, well, wait a minute. And that's kind of what happened with our lockdown. Oh, it's an emergency. Has anybody died yet? No, no. It's a potential for that to happen. So we're going to lock everybody down preemptively. They went to war

against us, and they did it preemptively, didn't they? So potential emergencies. And so words really matter. Yeah. And one of the things that i started back in october when i saw this coming uh october 9th i published an article the people's amendments.com and there's a list of words that need to be defined because what they keep doing is they keep putting words in these documents. And it's like the story

of Humpty Dumpty, the words mean whatever you want them to mean. And there are dozens upon dozens of words that people have been propagandized with all of the time, and I'm working to take them back, right? Vaccine does not have a legal definition. It was redefined on the CDC blog, but not in the law. The word pandemic has no definition. People talk about it, and if you ask anybody, well, what's your definition of the word pandemic or vaccine or safe or effective? All of these words don't mean anything in the law so whenever i would hear fauci say something like oh well you know we have all these cases right that um we're we use this test pcr is not a test it's a process okay um and and you know we have

this pandemic and so we now have this vaccine that's safe and effective, you could just go, well, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie. All of those words are just simply meant to deceive. If you ask anybody who uses those words to just stop a moment and go, pardon me, what's your definition of a pandemic? Can you point me to the Black Law Dictionary? Well, that's nice. There's a word there, but that's not the law, right? So the International Health Regulation has five pages of defined terms. They don't talk about a pandemic. They talk about a public health emergency of international concern. And it's essentially defined by, well, the director general wants to call it emergency

because there's money to be made in what I'm co-opting, PHEIC, Public Health Emergency of International Concern, fake, there's a different fake, and that's the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex. PHEIC, it's fake healing healing they don't heal anybody and Dave in my latest article about the biggest elephant in the room and I'm not talking about Republican the biggest elephant in the room is actually in Africa because

on the who's website they have a cute little graphic about cases around the world. And they have six regions. The Americas are North and South America together. That's one WHO administrative region. Most of Africa, not all of Africa, but most of africa is another region okay there's people don't realize how highly populated africa is there's a lot of people in africa in in a portion of africa that makes up the who region there's 1.2 billion people if you take north and south america put them together there's only about one billion people

so there's actually more people in africa than in all of the americas combined but here's the mind blower that they will they will not talk about okay 18 to 20 times as many people in the americas died as compared to africa it's a couple of orders of magnitude different. Okay. And so what we should be doing is talking to people. I don't even know if you know the name, because it's the very first article I wrote after I just got introduced to Substack. Dr. Shankar Chetty and Dr. Rup in south africa have treated tens of thousands of people and not one of dr chetty's patients even got into the hospital yeah he he published a paper on these uh world economic uh call them forfeiture uh forms that they've got they're so focused on

well we got to get to africa you know, we got to get IDs for these people. We got to get them vaccinated. How are we going to get all these people vaccinated? Because they're too smart. Yeah. And they figured out, Dr. Chetty published a paper, I believe it was in August, it might've been September of 2022. And he prevented every single one of his patients from even getting into the hospital

okay because he treats the problem and it is not what people think right i'm not going to get into it now we'll tease everybody for one of your you know shows down the road we'll get dr chetty on for you the the treatment that the nih and the fda and the cdc oh go home and take a tylenol and come back you know when we can make a lot of money off of you and what's going on the elephant in the room in africa is the delegates who don't represent the people of africa they represent corruption they stopped the amendments in may of 2022 because what the biden administration was proposing was all carrot and no stick and essentially they said well what's in it for us you just want us to do this this this and this sweeten the pot and so um they submitted article uh proposed article 44 a which is funding they

want equity dave which is not equality as you well know equity is money okay if you are talking about stocks right those are those are referred to as equity if you buy a home and you pay off some of the loan or you fix it up and improve it you have equity what what they're arguing for not on behalf of the wishes of the people because the people and their doctors who are wise enough to know, you know, in Madagascar, they used Artemisia, right? Elsewhere, they had different options. The numbers are so astonishingly low. What should be going on in these discussions is all of these doctors from Africa who saved people's lives should be telling the WHO, well, here's what we did. And there's obviously many doctors in the United States as well. But even the doctors in the United States did not do as well as the doctors in Africa. And the doctors in the US have a lot to learn from the doctors in Africa. There's a lot of good people who did a lot of work and saved a lot of lives, but that's not the discussion that's being had.

The elephant in the room is that they're arguing for billions of dollars, and the U.S. has already set up a fund like this. Dave, it's not fair. Let me ask you a question, and let me ask you a question. Are you back?, and let me ask you our... Are you back? Can you hear me? It froze just as you're going to ask me a question. I'm sitting here on the edge of my seat.

Look, we're going to reestablish contact with him. But as we look at this, have you noticed a trend here? Something that I've seen? For the longest time, we have had, as Nancy Pelosi said, with Obamacare, we have to pass it so we can find out what's in it. How are you going to find out what's in it? Well, the bureaucracy will write the rules. We have regulation without representation. We have taxation without representation as well through these bureaucracies. When we talk about the congressional representatives, they have given this power to the bureaucracies.

And as this so-called pandemic rolled out, it was all the rules. Are you back? Are you back, James? I think I am. Can you hear me? Yeah, I hear you. I was just saying what we have while you were gone. I said what we have here is really regulation without representation.

This is a trend that's been happening in bureaucracies about everything. You know, whether you're talking about Obamacare or whether you're talking about the IRS. And this is something that we saw happen in every country with the public health regulators, with the bureaucrats. They're the ones who are now calling the shots. And all of the so-called representatives that we have are just sitting on their hands doing nothing we are already ruled in pretty much every country that i have seen by a bureaucracy and so it's this health bureaucracy now that is coming up to the the top of the stinking heap to tell everybody what to do but you had a question you're going to ask me and the audience just as we launch uh what do you think the a chose yearly budget is for everything that they are responsible for.

Oh, I have no idea. A couple of hundred billion. What is that? Uh, too little 4 billion. Okay. 4 billion. Okay.

What do you think the, what do you think the United States government is obligated to pay out of that 4 billion assessed required payments? I don't know, but I imagine it's a pretty high percentage of it. 100 million. Oh, really? So I was wrong on both of those. I thought that had a budget budget and I thought that we'd be, uh, showering them with fiat currency. So what happened about 20 years ago is SARS-1,

okay, and a lot of exposure of corruption with the WHO and opiates and all that sort of thing. And so nations started to balk and we didn't want to give them more money and the reason why is that the assessed uh required payments kind of go into the general fund and the who gets to do whatever they want to do with them and so the change was made that the united states in this past couple of years germany has actually stepped up to the plate and is being the largest additional donated money over and above the assessed money because when the united states or any other nation gives money over and above what they're obligated to give that money comes with strings attached oh we're going to give you all this money but we want you to do this that and the other thing with it and so that's when all of the foundations the bill and melinda gates foundation rockefeller even the

international has given millions but that money comes with strengths and you know um um bill and melinda gates you know for whatever you know, they're all hepped up on shooting everybody up or giving them a polio vaccine. And the raging polio across the world that's left is vaccine induced polio. The strains that they're giving as the vaccine is actually what is spreading. That's right. Yeah. OK. That's right. Yeah. Okay. And so the monetary situation is, is clearly not what people think it is, but it's even worse than that because the WHO has actually published on their website, Hey, this, the way we're funding the WHO is not good because they're just being used by

foundations to funnel money to their crony holdings you know if if you're a foundation and you're part of this new 21st century advanced fascism where it's not mussolini's fascism from the 20th century where you have corporate and and government working together like we see with you know facebook and the fbi and all that sort of thing in bed what we have now is a triad of government corporations and foundations okay so now it's a three-legged stool modern-day fascism is very stable and so the money is given to organizations like planned parenthood and then they go and you know throw out the money however doing whatever it is they do billy Melinda Gates funnels money into whatever they want through the WHO. It's an organized crime money laundering scheme.

And Bill Gates said, well, you know, investing in vaccines is like, you know, 20 times more money than he's ever made. And you scratch your head and you go, how can that be? Right. It's because of the way it's set up so even the who has said in pub you know in their website that this is this is not working for us because they don't get to do what they want to do right and so the united states back in september of 2021 kamala harris wheeled out and put out this proposal, the US government pledged $850 million, which is eight times what they're obligated to pay directly to the WHO, to the World Bank pandemic fund. And they were hoping to raise from other nations a total of 10 or 11 billion. Well, they failed miserably. They kind of got matching funds. They got it up to about 1.6 billion. I wrote an article on my

sub stack with money going into a toilet because that's pretty much what's going on here. And they created what's called a financial intermediary fund. Now, the same health minister who touted Indonesia's pride in proposing amendments to set up a digital health certificate, most people didn't keep watching after that. But I clipped out a segment where he said to the audience, look, we're working on this $10 billion pandemic fund, which is, you know, that alone is two and a half times the entire WHO's working budget. They want it to be, the Lancet said that it really should be $60 billion a year, which is 15 times the budget. And they want that all to go into the pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex to make pandemic preparedness products. And the regulations also talk about the obligation of developed nations to build state-of-the-art infrastructure in developing nations. And so they want these billions of dollars to go where they

want it to go to do things that don't work. They actually made the problem 20 times as bad as it was in Africa. And so the elephant in the room is there's all of this money that the smaller nations in the world, they want equity. They make it sound like, you know, we're being racist or unfair or whatever, because the wealthier nations bought up all of the poison. They bought up all of the drugs. They bought up the Paxlovid and the Molnupiravir, and they bought up this, that, and the other injections. Busy killing a bunch of people in the Americas and Europe.

Kevin Kennedy And the African delegates and delegates from elsewhere are still of the mindset that, oh, they missed out on something that was supposedly good for them. Totally ignorant, and I pronounce that word that way on purpose, totally ignorant of the fact that africans did very very well in terms of quote unquote covid why in the world would you want to import something that is is continuing to kill people we do have a public health emergency of international concern that hasn't been declared it's called sudden death syndrome. And so they want to take all of these billions of dollars and build pharmaceutical-based infrastructure in Africa,

when what they should be doing is exporting the wisdom of the people who already solved the problem and saved lives. And that is not even open for a discussion and so all I'm trying to do is raise the awareness of everyone because they're trying to talk about a treaty and if you read the treaty it's all nice and kumbaya and you know sovereignty and the greatest health you've ever had in your life, all kinds of words that are distracting, mixed with one health, right? Where they would control every aspect of it. Dave, on September 21st, they had what they called an informal focused consultation. And they asked their experts, the asked their experts what criteria what metrics

could we you know use to make sure that Nations were prepared for whatever the problem might be next okay and the experts said that they didn't know they, we really owe it to ourselves to examine this better before we tell nations what they have to do because the metrics that were in place prior to 2020 showed that wealthy nations like Italy and Spain and Germany and Portugal and the UK and the United States,

they should have done very, very well. And the impoverished nations, maybe in Africa or Southeast Asia, wherever South America and so forth, um, the impoverished nations should have suffered, you know, horribly because they didn't have the resources. But they said, well, you know, it, it, it went the other way to the tune of 18 to 20 times as bad. And you know, I think that from the very beginning, as I had a listener in Africa that was telling me, hey, once we got the Europeans with all their face masks

and everything, and I heard, well, just, we're fine here. And I said, yeah, that's the thing. Whenever you look at, there's been so many conditions that would start in developing countries because they're poor or maybe they don't have a lot of resources. I said, if it's something that is a real threat, you would expect to see it raging in those areas. And yet without the help of this bioweapon vaccine, they did just fine. Well, the typical European colonialism, okay, is at work here in a different way, right? They're invading,

but it's the pharmaceutical industry that is at the forefront of trying to take over healthcare in Africa. Now, they've failed with COVID. The people in Africa, for the most part, were too smart for it. But the diplomats see that they can control the flow of money, which, you know, it's essentially trying to set up many tens of billions of dollars, organized crime activity, laundering money to their cronies. The Malaysian, I'm sorry, the Indonesian health minister, who's a banker, very clearly said to the audience at the G20, this is a wonderful business opportunity. Invest. So they're pumping, or they would like to pump, 15 times the amount of money into pandemic prevention, preparedness, recovery, and response to something that might happen in the future, maybe, right?

When they're only spending $4 billion a year, I say only, but in today's world, that is small. It's supposed to be about sanitation and fundamental health-building things that actually are what improved health. Anybody who looks into the history of quote unquote vaccines, these regulations go back 150 years before indoor plumbing and sewage systems. What the problem was is people had a chamber pot, they threw it out into the street

when they were done or wherever, you know, just something as simple as digging a latrine and concentrating your crap all right so that you're not living in it that cleaned up you know a lot was um done uh india recently you know in the last couple of decades you know finally got around to you know having those kinds of systems in place, the infectious disease rate plummeted. Things like cholera, which is a waterborne diarrhea disease, if the water is purified and the sewage is taken care of by whatever means is possible, the infectious diseases that are now being treated with poisonous injections, they basically

went away. Yes. And so the fraud of the entire pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex, my career for the second half of my life was all about natural health. And it's absolutely crystal clear that pharmaceutical drugs and these injectables are not healing products as they would like to define in Article 1 of the proposed amendments. What they really are is skillfully crafted poisons that function as customer acquisition tools. Preston Pysh, M.D.: You take a healthy person,

you stick something up their nose, you run a process and you call it a test and you go, oh my God, you're a case. You need to do this, that, and the other. They ultimately get poisoned in many ways. And then they have a lifelong of health problems you've just created. They don't really want to kill people in this regard. They want them to be on the edge of death for as long as possible, because then you pass something like the cares act and you get a 20% bonus when you stick something up your nose and say, oh, you're a co the case, so the money flows. Follow the money people. I agree. It's a billion dollar boon swaddle

going back to 2018 james going back to 2018 they were talking about it goldman sachs said used gilead uh the the company that did remdesivir they said look at this they they came up with a cure for one of the strains of hepatitis and they made 12 billion dollars the first year but it rapidly fell down to a very low level they said because they cured this we don't want to cure it that's not a business model and so they put out an article in 2018 warning all the pharmaceutical look you want to we want to treat chronic disease we don't want to cure any diseases and so they want to create chronic diseases they want to keep them going because that's where the money is. The pronunciation is actually run.

Death is near. Just to clarify that. And so moving forward, everybody always asks me, okay, well, what are we going to do? Yeah. Right. And so I think we got about maybe five or 10 minutes left. But everybody always asks me, okay, well, what are we going to do? Yeah. Right? And so I think we got about maybe five or 10 minutes left. I've put together a myriad of things that people can do.

And one of the things is very, very simple. You can give me a call and we can have a discussion about what it is that you can do that is right for you because of your passion and whatever it is you see going on in this particular situation i had a wonderful call with the person yesterday and we got into a you know person-to-person conversation and and he was very passionate about one aspect of this and what that aspect was is that in the last congress okay now um congress i've got a joke that i'll tell you off air about congress when we're done okay but congress is absolutely unaware of this and it's our job, unaware and confused, okay? It's our job as people to tell the representatives who work for us, they are our employees. If you had a business and your workers were just standing around doing nothing, causing trouble. But you had never actually given them something to do.

You didn't say, I have a job that I need done. I'm paying you to work for me. I'd like for you to work on this job. Get it done as soon as possible. Do it right. If you don't give them instructions of what to do, don't be surprised when they get to be doing stupid things but they have been i'm not saying they're going to listen but in in the last congress there were nine pieces of legislation submitted that were essentially anti-who in in the house there were three pieces of legislation

that were submitted in the Senate. Okay. 15 or so senators supported Senator Ron Johnson's piece of legislation. There's a piece of legislation to exit the WHO that got about 60 co-sponsors. There's a piece of legislation to defund. I'm sorry, that one got about 21. There's a piece of legislation to defund the who which chip roy has brought back okay he had 60 co-sponsors in the last congress and you know he's only got about 15 now those people are potential allies okay now i'm not saying that they're perfect or or that they that they are really going to go

and fight for it, but they did put their name on legislation in the last Congress. So step number one is to identify your allies. Dave, I've already found through people that I'm working with in Australia, they've already got two or three senators lined up who are publicly speaking out about this, recording videos, writing public letters um you know australia is aware of this there's a group in the netherlands that has put up a website stop who dot nl um people around the world are aware of this they're taking action and step number one is to identify your allies. David, you are absolutely an ally in my book. The alternative media, I have a list of 600 alternative media platforms that have been silent on this. And I've sourced with all of my subscribers.

You can go on an article alternative media hey why aren't all of these alternative media outlets doing what we're doing right here just having this discussion so step number one getting earned give me a phone call 310-619-3055 signal telegram whatsapp i turn my phone off when i go to sleep so don't worry about it don't call me now because we're talking today okay um and the point is that there is so many things that we can do right right and so what what's right for one person to do we'll find the thing where you fit in but step number one is share this video everybody can do that right and learn what this is all about go read the open letter to Congress

that you can push a button and it will send that letter to every member of Congress they they do not have plausible deniability it is obligation. It is their duty to defend this attack on our sovereignty. It says in the freaking document on page three, article three, section one, you know, fundamental principles, it would cross out respect for our dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms. Now, if your senator and your congressperson cannot stand up against that, okay, get in their face and explain to them the situation. Because I can tell you right now, I'm working on a very simple form. Are you for this? Are you against this? Or are you going to continue to try to waffle and be wishy-washy?

And unless you have openly, unless Congress, the Senate and the reps have openly, clearly publicly on their website, on their social media stated, but they are against this, then we have to assume they support it. And that's trees. Yeah, that's right. And that's treason. Yeah, that's right. That's right.

Yeah, if you can't oppose something that's going to take away our freedom and dignity, there isn't really much that we can talk about anymore. And one of the things I think, you know, James, I've said for the longest time, I think the way that we really have leverage over this is to organize issue by issue. And that's essentially what you're talking about. You know, somebody finding the issue that they're passionate about and focusing their energy on that issue. Are you there? I'm absolutely here.

I hope you can still hear me. Yeah, still hear you. Yeah, I heard a couple of things there. I thought we'd lost you. Go ahead. Dave, you know, thank you for the opportunity. I do believe that back in April or May or whenever it was, if you weren't the first, you were absolutely among the first to just give me an opportunity to spread this information. Thank you again. I count you as

an ally, as a friend, and everyone in your audience is blessed you know that you're well you're putting this out there they want this to be hidden yes and if you don't talk if people don't talk about this then you're doing the bidding of those who would keep it hidden okay whatever a person's opinion about this might be i encourage you to record whatever it is you want to say. I've been very gratified. People have been recording videos, just regular people. Back in September, I put a big push out. We got 300 to 400, I lost track, we got like 300 to 400 people who recorded 90 second videos about what they felt about the situation that was talking about the treaty back in september and you can everybody can go to screw the who.com and watch what regular people around the world had to say okay screw the who.com if you that, you'll learn about, you know, what they were doing with the treaty.

We are not talking about the treaty. Now we need people around the world to make their own videos. And, you know, you can start off with, Oh, hell no. And go from there. Yeah. And, and so they're talking about wanting to, you know, uh, consider this at the, um um 76 world health is may 21st may 30th so we've got you know four months maybe 120 days or so right to just let them be known that we are not having it they are you know you know the uh wef um slogan it needs a little bit of editing, Dave. They will control nothing and they will not be happy. That's right.

You guys, I want to control everything. It's interesting to me how much attention is paid and it's a good thing to pay attention to the WEF at Davos, but the week before when the WHO is scheming in Geneva, Switzerland, nobody pays any attention to it. Well, they swept that under the rug. And so if you want to know

where things are really happening quickly, it's going to be the stuff that they don't want you to see. And that's what you have done, James. I really do appreciate your work that you've done. You've done a tremendous amount of work. You've done a great job of organizing this stuff and you're getting more traction. I'm seeing your name show up in a lot of more places, a lot more places, uh, in alternative media. Although I know there's a lot that still aren't covering it. Uh, you are getting a lot of traction with this. So I really do appreciate the work you're doing. Well, it's, it's definitely not about me. It's about exposing what they want to have hidden. Um, and, uh, very thankful for you, Dave. Thank you. And that's what you're getting it done.

Yes. Appreciate it. And, uh, again, James Roguski that's R O G U S K I. And you can find his stuff at, um, uh, sub stack also, uh, screw the who.com website. Thank you, James. Uh, good to have you on the common man. They created common core and dumbed down our children. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.

Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.