The David Knight Show - INTERVIEW: NYSE & SEC Rolling Out NAC — Stakeholder Capitalism Where ALL Natural Resources are Rented

Episode Date: January 10, 2024

$4 Quadrillion (4,000 Trillion) in assets (according to them), i.e. EVERYTHING under their control using derivatives, crony capitalism, carbon credits to enact the old UN Agenda 21 map (renamed UN 2030 Agenda) with you locked down in "Smart" 15 minute Cities and the rest of the world locked up and off limits. Courtenay Turner, Courtenay Turner Show, joins to talk about the urgent campaign to inform people and push back against SEC approval, links belowFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.

If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. All right, joining us now is Courtney Turner, the Courtney Turner Show. And you can find her, she spells her last name,

C-O-U-R-T-E-N-E-Y. And thank you for joining us, Courtney. We got something very, very important that escaped my view, and it was brought to my attention by you and by Senator Frank Nicely, who was nice enough to forward this information. He said, you need to cover this NAC stuff. And I sent it back to you. I said, so what is an NAC? And then when I saw what this was, I started doing my own research. And it is truly amazing.

People really need to understand what this is. So thank you for coming on to explain what the natural asset companies are. This, folks, is where they start to roll in their ESG and all the rest of this stuff to cash in big time and to take everything from us. Thank you for joining us, Courtney. Tell us a little bit about how you caught on to this. And it seems like, as I look at it, this whole thing started, kicked off a couple of years ago with New York Stock Exchange, which is a minority partner in this scheme.

And it is a minority partner in this scheme and it is a scheme uh but now um in the fall the sec was talking about um you know authorizing this where are we now in this process well firstly thank you so much for having me um yeah this only was brought to my attention a couple of weeks ago maybe two weeks ago and uh then i scrambled to learn as much as possible so I'm I'm very much still scrambling trying to navigate all of this it does seem to have slid under the radar of most people I think by design you know so yeah so we're trying to really figure this out and sound the alarm so I did a show on it about a week ago, knowing very, very little, but just knowing that this is absolutely horrifying. And it really looks like, as you said, an extension of the ESG because there is so much ESG money, but it's not nearly as popular as I think they had hoped it would be.

And this is part of the big land grab. There is something called the 30 by 30 agenda, which is where by 2030, they hope to seize all of the water, land and natural resources for the purposes of what they call conservation. So conservation means that it cannot be used. And it sounds lovely. We're conserving the land. However, this means that there can be no productive use of the land so they want to do that by 2030 and then this is just a stepping stone to get towards what they call the half earth agenda which is where half of the earth cannot be inhabited by humans now some of you may have seen this map that was going around circulating. I certainly did in 2020.

And they were calling it like the FEMA map. And I've got the map right here, I think. OK, yeah. Perfect. And because this has been going around since this was first done in 1992. And it was at that point in time, everybody was talking about the UN Agenda 21. Sometime in the 21st century this is really what we want to have we want to restrict everybody from these different areas no human use

when you see this in the red the yellow is a buffer zone and then those few places that are blue that's normal use so they and it's so little it's almost non-existent it's not even half they're not even gonna of course these people are so greedy. They're not going to be happy with a 30% in 2030. They're not going to be happy with a 50% of the earth. They want everything. And you can hardly see any blue areas in this map because they want to take everything from us. And so they talked about you and Agenda 21.

We've seen this map for quite a while, going back to 1992. And then about 2014-15 they said okay 2030 that's when we want to do it and now we see how they're going to monetize this stuff including the esg stuff so i'll bring up one one thing you mentioned 1992 pelosi actually started a bill in 1992 this goes way back so this is like so many things that we see unfortunately it comes to our radar you you know, almost too late. On this one, I don't think it is quite too late, but we are close.

We really do need to sound the alarm to everyone possible to do everything possible to stop it. However, this has been in the works for decades. So 1992, Pelosi did a bill that she proposed this bill at the Health Earth Summit that was part of this whole agenda. And then back in, so when I was talking about the half-earth, there was a book by E.O. Wilson called Half-Earth.

And I think that was back in 2016. I may be confusing that with Dieter Helm, who that one was definitely 2016. And that was called Valuation of Nature. It's something like that. But that's essentially what this is. And what it's based on is in 2012, the UN proposed a new form of accounting. And they call it SEEA, ecosystem accounting. So that stands for systems, economic, environmental accounting, ecosystem accounting. And it's essentially just like a made up accounting system because GAAP generally, it's totally nonsensical because the generally accepted accounting principles would not work for this because generally accepted accounting principles are based on productivity, right?

You produce something that has value and then it can be sold. And this is completely the antithesis of this. This is valuing mother nature. And so they proposed this and there were, I think at the time, 90 countries that did sign on to NACs or some people are calling it NAC, which stands for the natural asset company. And of course, you know, many of the articles I pulled up said, But NACs or some people are calling it NAC, which stands for the Natural Asset Company. And of course, you know, many of the articles I pulled up said, but the United States has not yet signed up. Well, don't you worry. The Biden administration last year in January of 23, they created something called the National Strategy to Develop Statistics for Environmental Economic Decisions. And this, they proposed an executive order. This was in January of 23. And it was based on this, to put nature

on the balance sheet. So this is terrifying because it now means that we can use the land in America under these natural asset companies to offset debt so this means yeah this is how they close the loop on this stuff and as you pointed out nancy pelosi releasing this stuff in 1992 but of course that's they've been planning it long before that but they've been gradually rolling this out setting up bogus legal frameworks creating what this is essentially it's like like the derivative stuff. And if people think that this sounds too fantastic, just think about what they did to us to create

the mortgage crisis, right? They create these securitized mortgages and created all this ambiguity about who actually has the title to it and hide this stuff and do it in a derivative way and look at the damage that they did. This is what they're trying to do with these natural asset companies. And there is, you know, it's the Rockefeller Foundation and two other groups that are involved in this, but a minor party is the New York Stock Exchange. And so they're all in this together in this casino.

They're all in this together. It truly is amazing. It is amazing. Not in the most positive of ways, but it is amazing. No. So you're right. The New York Stock Exchange, you would think that's sort of a conflict of interest, but they do. They are a partner in this.

They partnered with the IEG, which is the Intrinsic Exchange Group. And I encourage people to go and look up lots of videos from Douglas Ecker, who is the CEO of the IEG. And here are the words from the horse's mouth. And he talks about this partnership with the Rockefeller. So you're right. It is the rock. It's being funded. The IEG is being funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, as well as the I IBD lab and IBD bank. They do a lot of work in South America and they're another funding entity. It's called the Inter-American Development Bank and then Aberdeer Ventures.

Now, I don't know too much about Aberdeure Ventures, but it's very curious to me because they're involved in healthcare technology. So I, you know, have to wonder. I looked them up and they're a venture capital firm. But primarily with healthcare technology. Right. But it's the digital healthcare stuff. So this really fits into the whole thing. You know, I talk about MacGuffins, you know, it doesn't really matter what the so-called crisis is that's just to motivate you you know just like hitchcock would say could be the maltese falcon it doesn't really matter but you got to get people motivated to chase this thing and so you got to get people motivated about the health care mcguffin right or

the pandemic mcguffin or the climate mcguffin and so these people, this Aberdare Ventures, they have been involved with this. They started pouring money into health care IDs and passports and things like that. And now they're jumping on board with this on the climate side because it's going to be the justification to actually take this stuff from us. And for everybody that doesn't think this is going to happen, again, think about the mortgage derivatives and financial crisis that they created. But then on the other side, look at the power of government to just come in and take land. I said earlier in the show, Courtney,

I was talking about how here where I live, the Great Smoky Mountain National Park, I love to go there, but it bothers me when I drive in and I see what they did to steal the land of the people who lived in Cades Cove and other places like that. They just took it. And so that's the power of government. They've already done it. You know, they did it 100 years ago. They can do it again. And then what happens is you've got the UN coming in and declaring it a World Heritage Site and doing that with several hundred parks across the country so that how easy would it be

for them to come in as they're talking about with these nacs they said well you know we will do this if it's public land uh this is how we'll run it if it's private land this is how we'll do it they don't have to buy the property they can come in management yeah if the government comes in and says okay uh you can um you you you can, you can own and manage the Great Smoky Mountain National Park. And what do they do? Well, they're going to collect carbon credits and things like that and keep people off of it. And they will collect all that money, and then they'll kick 50% of it back since it's public land. They'll kick 50% of it back to the public, and everybody will be just fine with that.

Look, this is great. And it's this massive scheme. The other thing I see in this is that they're going to, by selling this on Wall Street, if we don't stop this quickly, anything that the SEC has done could be undone. But if they start selling this, you're going to have pension funds invested in it. You're going to have individual investors invested in it, and they're going to fight big time to make sure this doesn't get undone. so that's why we've got such a short timeline on this i think we do i before i get to that because that is so incredibly important i do want to

address the 2050 uh agenda so if you look up agenda 2050 you mentioned agenda 2130 um there is a whole proposal for uh agenda 2050 for it's like a it's a health care system using all this biometric data they do it under the name of like helping the emt so that they can locate people but it really is a grid yeah i know but it really is a grid and if you're familiar with the un's uh centennial plan uh the un. They're talking about the centennial of the UN, which would be in 2045, so 2050 is after that. And they are working in partnership with the Boston Global Forum

to create what's called an AI World Society. And the book has already been written. It's in conjunction with a former Massachusetts governor, Michael Dukakis. And yeah, I know. been written uh it's in conjunction with a former massachusetts governor michael dukac and yeah i know he just celebrated his 90th birthday but he's not slowing down so he's going strong and she's like henry kissinger he'll keep going until he dies there's always a neutral suspect these same names keep coming back to haunt us over and over again but they're doing it's called uh remaking the world the age of global enlightenment so if that's not a nod to you know the whole new age

movement if you know anything about lucius trust which was formerly looser lucifer publication it is the underbelly uh it's a consultancy to the un so makes perfect sense there but they talk about this ai world society which in my view looks kind of like a cyber satan if you will um and it's a they they did a whole symposium on uh rebuilding ukraine they talk about how ukraine was decimated in the war we need to send more money and rebuild ukraine so that ukraine can be the hub for this ai world society which will make a grid in conjunction with all these other smart cities around the world so i just bring that up because it's interesting that abadir is one of these funders in this because it looks like you know of course region smart also just went through uh they passed a

bill it was uh 2716 i believe was the senate bill that passed through to allow region smart which is owned by black rock and it's a tri-state quasi government essentially but they're using smart sensors i know mississippi tennessee and arkansas have already created this consortium and there are several other states that are moving forward with this so that's something else for people to look into but to get back to this so that's abadara venture and then there's uh entertaining ideas and i've never heard of them i could not find any information on them i don't know anything about them unfortunately um but they are uh but then of course the rockefeller foundation and then the the wildlife uh foundation which was the brain

child of julian huxley of unesco who is the one who coined the term transhumanism and who is also a very openly known eugenicist you know of course so they all subscribe to this malthusian worldview which is essentially what this you know is all about and i think you had read an article yesterday that was about david webb's book and it looks very relevant to this this to me does look like how they're going to create another financial crisis just like you mentioned with 2008. It's very similar to the derivatives. This is made up valuation. So they're trying to put a value on things like air, the air we breathe, water, as you mentioned, the natural parks, the mining resources.

But here's the difference. You talked about like the carbon credit so what they'll actually do is you will have you can buy natural you can invest in natural asset company and that will provide an offshoot to carbon to your carbon expenditure so it becomes an off sorry an offset it becomes an offset and that's where the value that's how they're going to monetize it as an offset to carbon you know it's interesting because you keep seeing this uh public private partnership type of stuff that's what it is the government gets a cut on it you know so uh as they're saying you know if it's a private land uh they can participate in this carbon tax stuff and they uh they put

five percent of it if it's private land they put 5% of it in a public trust. If it's public land that they turn over to them, like a national park or something, 50% will go to them. But they're still going to make 50% or 95% as a profit on this stuff, and they're going to be able to sell it out there as a carbon credit, and the governments are going to require people to buy it. What is interesting about this is it's this odd mixture of communism and capitalism that we've seen.

Yeah, exactly. Kind of fascism, which is the mixture of government and corporations. And we've seen this in China. And we've seen this in China, but now they're going to put it on the stock market. And that's the innovation. Rather than it just being tightly held like the chinese do it they're going to try to broaden the support by putting it on the stock market that's the the diabolically genius thing that they're going to do with this stuff it is and so here here's the other thing that makes this really really terrifying because as you said they

put it on the new york stock exchange which now opens it to a global market. This means that our foreign adversaries can now invest in domestic land. And of course, you know, when I kept reading these articles saying, oh, the United States hasn't signed on yet, but, you know, we're working on them. I think it's because the United States is so rich in natural resources. So they want to scoop this up so that they can put a hold on it. Essentially, you can't produce on this land. Remember, now here's the other thing that is incredibly diabolical is that private land is encompassing this and primarily through conservation easements. So let's say you own a private piece of property and then a lot of people,

and there's this major push right now for conservation easements and i i think it's uh you know really it was back in 1980 when the conservation act was passed through uh that's you know laid the groundwork again we're we're talking you know they they're they're it's like the fabian socialists they're masters of incrementalism they keep building building building uh and then they pull the trigger, so to speak, you know, proverbially. But this Conservation Act, I think, will pave the way for all these conservation easements. So essentially, you could have private land, and let's say you put a conservation easement on your land in order to get a tax credit or, you know, for whatever reason now this becomes your private property can become part of a natural asset company which means that they have access to manage the land i think that's really important for people to understand it's not just about ownership of land they can manage it which means that now it would be like in your house not renting rooms out but you've actually sold rooms

to other people now they have total purview over what to do with those rooms in your house. And that's what happens with this. And it's the, when you talk about the, you know, communism, fascism, I think it is also technocracy because we're putting it on a digital stock

exchange, right? So it is very, and you know, with all the other technology that could be implemented in this, I think there's a reason Abadir Ventures is involved. I don't know enough yet to make that that claim but i have my suspicions certainly with what we've seen already well they seem to be right there at the at the center wherever they're you know pushing the the the problem uh crises of of people they've got the digital global solution

that they're going to be able to uh market you, we look at this and people have talked a lot about how companies like Nestle or whatever are grabbing the water, for example. OK, they don't actually have to do that with this. That's, I guess, the genius of this. You know, they can get control of this stuff without actually having to lay the money out. And that's what makes it really a part of this this whole great taking perspective is that they've got a derivative for control and and that's how they can monetize it yeah exactly they can monetize it they can sell it to people people can can come into it and and really when i looked at this it's like that's what they're talking about with stakeholder capitalism

yeah you got it you can be a stakeholder in this because we're going to put this on the stock exchange. We're going to have this communist takeover and confiscation of land, but we'll sell shares in it. And that's exactly what this is. It's amazing to me to see that. Like I said, it's diabolically clever. And we've got to stop this thing as soon as possible. You see the cooperation between the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission, they're going to just give them a green pass on all this stuff. Exactly.

And so it is communistic in the sense that, you know, this is not about productivity. So I really wanted to rule that to people. This means that this land, we can't mine resources. You know, you can't mine gold lithium but what happens if uh say china buys a natural asset company that has a ownership of large land that's very rich in lithium so what happens then right so we wouldn't be able to use it but who knows what you know they might do later down the road. So they want to withhold it so that they can, you know, monetize their access. Especially farmland.

You know, we talked about water, but farmland as well. This is how they starve us as well. Exactly. Not only owning everything, but locking down and making it all limits to us. Sorry, you can't do any farming. You're going to have to eat the soylent green that Bill Gates has got for you. You got it yep i at the farming uh the production the oil i mean imagine they buy a lot of these natural asset companies in texas where no oil can uh then be extracted so they are putting so yes this is a

ruling the new york stock exchange has a appeal to appealed to the SEC to have it listed as a new category of companies on the New York Stock Exchange. And there is hope because this has been extended. So there's clearly been outcry. Not enough, unfortunately, but enough to extend this and derail them slightly. So it has been extended right now to January 18th. So people do need to move quickly and to go under the SEC, the Securities Exchange Commission, to file their comments. Also, I encourage everybody to to make a complaint. And so they have now extended it. So it's January 18th is the last day for comments.

And then you can have rebuttals of comments i think is extended to february 2nd but it is really really time sensitive uh so put as much pressure not just on your federal representative state representative but i really encourage even like county because there's a lot of land ownership through the counties and that's you know the more locally we can take some action i think the more power we might have. And certainly write comments. And you can under the SEC website, you can find there's like all the comments. They're open.

They're public to read. So you can read all of the comments that have been made if you need suggestions and ideas of what to say. And then I encourage everybody to go to america stewards for liberty.us i'm actually having margaret biefeld on my show tomorrow she has been a very loud voice against all of this and uh you know really outlining this very very clearly but their website is phenomenal and they have a link to the comment they made, which is about eight pages long, eight or nine pages. And they go through all of the really just horrifying possibilities of what could happen with these naturalized companies and why. And let me say, it's good for them because they understand it and because they are educating people.

But if you as an individual want to make this comment, just as I began the program, talking about how there were so many comments criticizing the federal government the national park system removal of that william penn statue and within hours they pulled it back it's like whoa and i've seen this um with homeschooling against a very very powerful teachers union lobby in north carolina they were and and it was a state that was completely controlled by democrats that were allied politically with this teachers union and they wanted to shut homeschooling down and a small group of homeschoolers everybody wrote in letters

and swamped them with this stuff and they backed off and so it's always possible that something like this can happen and so you know don't you can go there and look at some issues and you can push back against it. But you don't have to make a real erudite argument or something that's very complicated. They're going to measure the response by the quantity, by the weight of these letters and responses. And it's probably more weight if you can get some people who are, like you said, local government officials to chime in. If they can just send in a small letter or something like that, that would also be important as well. But we only got eight days now on the January 18th. So it's really getting close.

It's amazing. I will list just for people, if you don't mind, just the seven. In their comment, they explain all seven. But I can read just very briefly what the seven are. Go ahead. Just to give people a sense. So the first one is the proposed rule authorizes federal lands, including national parks, to be enrolled in NAC or NACs. Proposed rule gives management authority.

So this is what I was talking about. It's not just about ownership. It's management. And management for them means means conservation which means you cannot produce on it you cannot use the water you cannot use the land you can't farm on it you can't extract the minerals um so then the biden administration is preparing to enroll federal lands in nac and that's what I talked about with their accounting system you know they have a whole and this accounting system I don't know if we can see this but this is the front page of it and it is a U.S. system of natural capital accounting associated environmental economic statistic office of science and Technology Policy Office of Management and Budget Department of

Commerce and this was January 2023 and this was also part of uh Biden had done a 15-year green economy plan and part of that was uh this was like six days after he got into office he started something called America the Beautiful which is is part of his whole, yeah. They're masters of language. They always make it sound really nice. But it's part of the 30 by 30 agenda. And then the fourth point. While you're talking about the management thing,

going back to the Bundy Ranch standoff and the Bureau of Land Management and all that kind of stuff is, as Clive was saying, what they're managing is trying to manage us off of the land. They're not doing any land management. They want to get everybody off. And he was the last farmer there that had been about 50-some-odd farmers.

He was the last one here in California. And so we were looking into the time, and it's like, okay, so what are they up to? We had seen the government turn over the Tonto National Park in Arizona. John McCain was a part of that at the time. And they'd found copper. And they had set up these national parks. They're going to be there for recreation for people. But also for the Apaches, it was of great historical importance to them, as well as religious importance to them. But for the people who wanted the parks as recreation, they came in and said, well, we don't care about that. We're going to give it to an Australian company. They're going to do a copper mine. It's going to be a strip mine thing. And they're going

to create a crater that's so large you can see it from space. And so this is the kind of stuff that we have seen our federal government do and try to do. And we were scratching our heads and saying, okay, so what is it that they know about this area? Have they discovered some valuable mineral, uranium or lithium or oil or something? What is it that they want with this scruffy desert area? But of course, that's what this is all really about. And so when you look at this, then it all comes together. They're going to manage it, and then they're going to create this massive public fund that everybody has to pay carbon taxes for whenever you do anything where you if you use any energy you got to pay them a a tax and then they'll kick it back to the politicians and they'll split it that's what

this public-private partnership is about it's about this fascist uh splitting of it and they've added this uh ingenious uh side thing of the stock market to do it to do it crazy i'm sorry go ahead with the other no yeah that you were spot on it's terrifying um so then the proposed rule invites foreign interest to invest in nacs and that is really really scary i i don't know if you're familiar with, it was Chi Ho-shun, I might be mispronouncing that, but he was a Chinese Minister of Defense

and he had written a secret memo and the Epoch Times released it. And he talked about how a lot of the elites in China have deeds on American property already and they're waiting for the, right? so it's like well now they don't need to wait they can just invest in natural asset companies and take

management over the land they already have something like 250,000 people are starting to wake up to that and put in some local or state restrictions on that so yeah they can just do an in round uh an end run around with these uh nacs exactly and not just china of course there's you know russia saudi arabia lots of uh foreign adversaries who we may not want having controlling uh rights to our land and then the fifth one is land trust can enroll conservation easements without landowners permission and that one i really just it's it's so diabolical you know it's antithetical in my opinion to everything this nation stands for uh you know the the notion of private property rights and that is literally saying that that without your

permission or possibly even awareness that now they have purview over your property. And let me interject here and say we've seen this type of thing already. We've had situations. First, we had the Kelso, I think, was in Connecticut, where they came in and they said, we're going to do eminent domain for private corporation, right? And then it got worse with the TransCanada pipeline that they were going to do. And as TransCanada was a company.

They were doing the Keystone pipeline. And they were going in and letting this foreign company condemn property, farms that people had had for over a century. They would let them condemn it and take it for their use. And so this is not a theory that they would do this kind of stuff. They've already been testing the waters and they've already got established some precedents and gotten the courts to go along with them on this stuff. Yeah,

that's absolutely right. And they do. I think that's a really important point. They do do a lot of this, like beta testing to see what they can do. How will people respond? And then they tweak things. So they lay out plans you know

decades and decades earlier and then they start building the foundation in order to execute those plans but along the way they do lots of tests um yes so they can refine those plans yes um so then the sixth one is exclusive rights to natural processes will be monetized and assigned to natural asset companies um and that's what we're talking about with the uh carbon offsets and then the production of resources is prioritized over human flourishing and this one is you know just to spell it out essentially what they're saying is that to protect that land, again, their term is conservation, is more important than any productivity. In fact, there can be no productivity. So as you mentioned, this is a way they can starve us out.

And that's exactly what they're saying. They're admitting it. And that's a hallmark of everything they're trying to do with this climate stuff. You're going to have to shut down your farms. You can't have meat or dairy because, you know, we've got nitrogen or co2 that we gotta worry about right and so they can come up they kind of bogus uh mcguffin and and tell us you're not important we got to save the earth you know and that's uh again that is this is all about the environment and climate uh mcguffin that's where they're they're rolling this thing in and i think it's worth noting that you know i i'm sure

you're familiar with the club of rome's document uh the limits to growth in 1972 well their document global reformation in 1992 admitted that they created it uh the the narrative as propaganda because they realized nobody was gonna i'm paraphrasing paraphrasing but essentially they said nobody was gonna buy the junk science that they were promulgating. But they said if they created a common enemy, that people would rally behind it. So they decided that the enemy of humanity was man. This is why you are the carbon they want to reduce. And they admitted this in their global reclamation document in 1992.

I mean, they flat out admitted it. It's a hoax. It's a lie in order to push their malthusian agenda yeah yeah and by the early 2000s they were pushing this gaia theory and i mean we had our kids were young and we went to the uk and it was filled with all this stuff about and i recorded i still haven't found the recording yet but uh i didn't record it because of this is crazy they had this loop playing in a children's play area, propagandizing the kids,

telling them that Mother Earth, Gaia, was this sentient being essentially and that human beings are a virus and so we've got to be eliminated. And so that's how they see us. As part of this depopulation thing, it's how they justify it, that we're just a virus

and the Earth is more important than you and the Earth is actually this sentient being it's it's absolutely crazy but that's that's what they're pushing with people and you know the other thing that concerns me about this Courtney was the the fact that Wall Street involvement in this and we go back and we look at the president's especially with Trump you know everything about the kind of the only metric that really mattered was how was Wall Street doing right? That's how these people are focused on this. And we saw during the lockdowns, Trump's lockdowns in 2020, the Wall Street companies, they were essential, but you are not essential. This is the mindset of all these politicians in both parties, including Trump.

And this is how this thing is going to roll out. They don't care about anything but Wall Street because that's how they're going to exercise their control. That's how they're going to make sure that we own nothing. And they were kicked off of all the land. I've watched this for so long and I kept thinking, how are they going to do it? Well, now we know. Now we know. Yeah, this is exactly how they plan to roll it out. And that's right. And I think that is a really important point for people to understand. You know, I talk a lot about the hegelian dialectic they they hit from both ends but both sides are marching towards the omega point you know he would call it the omega

point which is uh for him he said that state equals god and uh for uh these people i call them the parasite class the uh state the state is the worldwide governing body the centralized governing body of the world that they're trying to create along with their centralized world religion which from my vantage point looks like they're trying to create a ai god that seems where they're going and i think also when you look at this in the the stock market aspect of it you know i said for the longest time that I really don't think it's going to be like a centralized government in anywhere more so than the U.N. They're exercising a lot of control. But I said it'll be a global governance.

And this global governance will be, as they keep telling us, it'll be a public-private partnership between the governments and this corporatocracy that is over and above everything and how they're going to sell shares in it and all the rest of the stuff. And now we can see how they're going to sell the shares in it. Now we can see how the corporations and the governments are going to ally. I think this natural asset company thing, that is really the way they're going to roll this stuff out. And they're talking about how they see it as a $4 quadrillion worth of assets out there. Yeah, they do. Unbelievable. You know, you're talking about $4,000 trillion that are out there.

That's the kind of money that these people are looking at by locking everything up, taking control of water, of air,land of everything yeah absolutely and that number as astronomical as it is it is made up i mean they're they're literally just placing a value on things that you know of their own admission cannot be evaluated yeah they've always said that was the problem and how did they achieve this valuation By creating a voodoo accounting system. Yeah. I mean, it's literally a made-up, nonsensical accounting system because of their own admission, their own words, the generally accepted accounting principles do not work.

Why do they not work? Because they're based on production. They're based on actually having a product to sell. And now they're doing the opposite. This is about the degrowth agenda this is about having no production um and you know in their words conserving and uh of course they're using the climate narrative as a means of pushing it through the climate crisis as they call it but yeah it really is a futile system and they get these grants from you know the i guess the uh the king now is a

stock market it's kind of access to this stuff yeah you still have the nations that are there and they're going to play a role in terms of administration of this but the the governance will be global and it will be um this is kind of stakeholder thing what were some of the other things uh that they were talking about in their seven or eight point? Those were the seven points that they outlined. And then they go into detail on, you know, what that would mean is a pretty long article. So they do go through what each of those are. But let me see if I can find any other thing. Let me just say, too, we'll put this in the video on Rockfin.

Thank you very much, Jen Jonesones thank you for the tip and she also uh gave us a link to file your comments about the national asset companies and we got a link there we'll put that in the um in the description and link to view the comments so she's already given that to me thank you for saving me the time of looking that up and on rock fan surge the purge thank you for the tip. He says, if anyone wants a lesson in what one stock market move can do to kill a currency, look at 1815. Nathan Rothschild's claim that Britain lost the war to deflate the currency so he could buy all of it at a lower price, which led him to have more of a stake in government than anyone else. He controls the money supply, controls the government. That's absolutely true.

It's going to be a financial takeover with this stuff. Well, and Margaret Biefeld had a really great quote, you know, about property rights said that we either own property or we become the property that's owned. That's right. That's right.

I wanted to point out also, I found this in my research that they hired a publicity firm it's called Confluence Partners I'm not familiar with them but it was the IEG the intrinsic exchange group who hired this marketing company and I just thought it was very interesting because they they talk about it very openly on their website how the IEG was like a case study and that it was very important to poise the narratives for journalists so they're really trying to position uh you know the media for how to relay what these are these natural asset companies and how we should convey this to the public and then they talk about also how to market it to ngos and i

just thought that was all very interesting that they clearly realized this was not going to be very widely popular and they needed to hire a publicity uh marketing company in order to craft their narratives for them and they're going to be working on that quite a bit this next week at the World Economic Forum. Whenever they have their meetings, they put out massive number of articles and all these, and that's where they go together to get their talking points, to lay the stuff out for the mainstream media to pair it and to repackage and to keep feeding to the public

for the rest of the year. So that's coming up this of the year so that's coming up this next week but you know that's on the 15th and then on the 18th we're going to be quietly rolling out this thing um you know to do a stock market takeover of natural um natural uh assets uh throughout the the country truly is amazing and uh i i put up a bunch of articles on my Twitter because the World Economic Forum has been preparing for this for quite a while. And there are several articles where they talk about, you know, the valuation of natural asset companies, the valuation of natural resources. So you go to my profile and you type in WEF. I linked a whole bunch of articles because i

couldn't fit them into the broadcast that i did it was one hour long and there were there's several of them but so again they've been you know doing this for a long time but you can see in the past two years those articles seem to ramp up so the world economic forum and the un are very much working in partnership on this um it is a process and you know again when i looked at this it's like that's why esg makes so much sense and and you're seeing articles about how people are are really angry about how black rock and state street and they have been pushing this esg stuff and essentially blackmailing publicly held companies saying,

we've got a lot of your stock and we want you to do this and this environmentally and, you know, with the social agendas that they're pushing. But that was really kind of the blackmail model. And you're looking at this and you're saying, yeah, but where do these people get paid with this? And we've even had lawsuits led by the Tennessee State Attorney General Scarametti saying, it's fundamentally dishonest. You're out there telling people that you're a money-making enterprise here as a BlackRock and getting them to invest in BlackRock so you can buy shares in these companies,

but then you're getting the companies to do stuff that undermines the value of your investment. And so you're being dishonest about this. You're not doing this for financial reasons. You're doing it for your political agenda or whatever. But now you can see the financial side of this kicking in with the NAC. And so that's where the payoff is. They're always playing the long game.

And just as people are catching on to this ESG stuff, now they're playing always playing the long game and and just as as people yeah as people are catching on to this esg stuff now they're going to pivot to uh this nac stuff which is going to be not only for profit but for outrageous profit that they're going to outrageous profit everything it truly is amazing and i just keep looking at this she keeps saying amazing amazing i know i'm repeating myself here but i i just i I, when I saw this thing, it's like, whoa, what a scheme. And the fact that so few people know anything about it. Yeah.

Yeah. I mean, they, they brought this up during, I guess like Christmas when most people would not be paying attention. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. But the fact that they've extended, it does mean that there has been pushback and they're they're feeling it um so i think that that is encouraging we just need a lot more of it and uh when you bring up black uh black rock i don't know enough about it i'm going to do

a dive on it uh this week but region smart is owned by blackrock and that is that tri-state quasi government that they're creating using smart sensors and um yeah and the senate has passed through a bill on that already i don't i don't know how it's tied to this but i imagine it is and so i i that that seems to be how they work. It's usually all connected. So, um, it really is, it really is global governance that is planting the flag and seizing this property. And the other thing I looked at is like, yeah, we know that they want to set up this, this kind of serfdom where we own nothing. We rent everything, right? Everything is about rental. And so this fits perfectly into that paradigm of you will own nothing and you will rent everything from us.

And it really does go back to kind of a feudalism where, you know, if somebody had connections to the monarchy or they liked them or whatever, they would give them, you know, a fiefdom. And, you know, they kick money back to the monarch and all the rest of the stuff, but they would just grant this to them. And that's really what is going to be happening here. Who gives them the right to take this stuff? And, but of course they've done this over and over again within the United States and other places with their national parks and things like that. And then, you know, turning it over to kind of a UN supervision with the world heritage thing.

And then to, to take the example of the great smoky mountains since there were roads that ran through it the the state of tennessee once you know upon a time states did exercise some authority and they said well you're not going to charge people to go into that park so we were the last park that they didn't charge people to go into and they still don't charge people to actually go into it but now they came up with a scheme where they said we're going to charge you if you stop and so you can't park and so that's a way that they gradually start monetizing this stuff and um you know and but now they're just going to turn it over to wall street who knows what wall street will do with all this

stuff it is insane really it is insane and and you're right actually of their their own words they do use the the term governance uh global governance so they do say that as opposed to government so that is very accurate and it is obviously we can see it it's being pushed through private public partnership right and they'll keep the the labels of different countries they won't do away with america but america will be subservient to them in the same way that, you know, since the Civil War, we've seen the states become more and more subservient to the federal government.

They still keep them around and still give them some things that are within their purview, but it is going to be this centralized thing and it'll gradually get stronger and stronger and stronger as we've seen the central government get stronger and stronger since the Civil War. It's going to be the same type of approach.

Well, thank you. Well, if you read, I just want to address that. If you read Brzezinski, and I think Attali also talked about it. He was known as, like, the French Kissinger. They talk of, yeah. The French Kissinger. Yeah, the Kissinger of france or whatever um the futurists you know people think they're so prescient but it's pretty easy to predict the future when you planned it you know um and when you execute it and then you

execute it yeah you know that it's amazing how that works out. But they talk about this. They talk about how they want to disintegrate nation states. However, there'll be remnants of a nation state through power blocks. So and you've seen this attempt to execute that through things like NATO. They tried with the North America Treaty, right? They're trying to create these power blocks um but they're not necessarily uh nation states anymore and that that was their goal i don't know how successful they'll be in it but uh i think it's important for people to be aware that those were uh written plans that they were attempting to execute and then of course you would have this uh public private partnership

these uh corporatocracy which is also going to work in conjunction with a technocracy and i do think they want to roll out like a a ubi with a digital currency where you're getting carbon credits and i think these natural asset companies are a huge part of that agenda as well so it really is the the real threats to us always run through the financial system. When you look at Zbigniew Brzezinski and his trilateral designs and how he wanted to create three regions and then

unite those three regions, and we saw that attempt to put that through through the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Trans-Atlantic Partnership stuff. Fortunately, those have been put on the back burner for now. But that was the idea. The same thing they did with Europe. First, we'll create a common market for trade purposes, and then we'll on the back burner for now. But that was the idea. The same thing they did with Europe. First, we'll create a common market for trade purposes, and then we'll become more and more financially integrated. Then we'll go to a common currency and so forth, and then a governance.

And so it always begins, you know, this governance forigniew Brzezinski's final vision of the technocratic state. Exactly. Where they will know everything that you're going to do before you do it and be able to predict what you're going to do and watch everything you're going to do. Well, that's what the CBDC is about and universal basic income. And he was talking about this in the 1970s. That's why they selected him and put him in the position of really kind of controlling the Carter administration. But it's these people like Kissinger and Brzezinski and the French Kissinger. Jacques Attali.

Yeah. Just call him the French kisser, I guess, is what we call this guy. But it's never heard of him before but the uh but you know that that's like you said they can predict this because they are going to be uh as carl rove said we are history's actors and we're going to make this happen you could go analyze what we're going to do but now that we know what the plan is they're 15 minute cities there's cbdc stuff and all the rest of the stuff now it's time folks there's not a lot of time they want to roll this stuff out in the next four or five years.

They're going to roll it out, and then whoever's next president, they're going to roll it out with that guy. And they're already rolling this stuff out in terms of the financial constructs, and that's what we need to oppose. And so we'll put that stuff up on the comments of this. And thank you so much for coming on and telling us about it. Again, you can find Courtneyney at courtney turner.com and she spells courtney c-o-u-r-t-e-n-e-y courtney turner show thank you so much courtney appreciate that yeah

thank you so much for having me and yeah i am bringing attention to this because yes it's really important and i think we do have some power to stop it um i did i did want to address you said carl rose says that we are history's actors. You know, that is also what Heidegger, Hegel, and Marx say as well. You know, history uses people and discards them. It can't be that you've got a Republican campaign guy quoting Marx. I just wanted to point that out. Yeah, exactly.

Yeah, they're on the same page, aren't they? It's this phony illusion of Democrats and Republicans. And here you got this guy, George W. Bush's campaign guy, quoting Marx. That is so telling, isn't it? Thank you so much, Courtney. Thank you for what you do. And again, very important issue. We're going to try to get the word out and we'll do what we can about this.

Thank you so much. You're so welcome yeah i think senator nicely who introduced us has uh requested that i come speak at the capital next week i'm waiting to hear back so hopefully senator nicely understands what's going on very rare that you get somebody that's got the integrity and the discernment that he has we really are fortunate to have him here in Tennessee. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.

People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds. It's The David Knight Show.