The David Knight Show - Mon 1Jul24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED - Debating Biden's Future

Episode Date: July 1, 2024

(2:00) The Debate is now about Biden's Future — Will Dems Do a Great Replacement?Hysteria on the left, combined with a phon "who knew"Jon Stewart on the left and others on the right push 25th Amendment replacement of BidenWATCH What does the Fetterman election tell us about mentally incapacitated candidates' chances of winning?Jill was always intoxicated with power — remember the first G7?Colonel Macgregor — it's obvious the US govt is in "unelected hands"Weekend with Brezhnev, a Precedent for President Biden? - Soviet leader "died" in 1976 stroke but "ruled" another 6 years in a daz(32:11) What does the debate transcript tell us?The most amazing thing about the debate was not Biden's mental issues but the fact that NO vital issues were discussed.  Here's what they ignored…Both candidates lied or avoided answering even the weak questioning about non-vital issues by CNNMass Murdering Child Killers — as the vaccine only got brief mention, a NEW STUDY from Hong Kong confirming the "New Normal" of childhood heart attacks thanks to Trump & BidenGuess why there was not a single question about 2nd Amendment rights(1:24:46) Reckless Pollution, Endangering Protected Species — This is What "Climate Change" Has Become in 2024Several thousand Joshua Trees — protected by TWO laws — destroyed for a "solar farm"Not even eagles are protected as Interior Department prioritizes windmillsLithium — dirty, destructive, and China has been given a monopoly on manufacturing60,000 gallons of lye into the ocean are only the beginning of this hair-brained CO2 schemeForget "Ze Bugs", DARPA wants you to eat plasticInformation to fight the globalist 2030 scheme at the state level(1:59:27) Amy Coney Barrett — CONSISTENTLY WRONG on 1st AMENDMENTHundreds of Jan6 convictions overturned by Supreme Court as Barrett joins Obama appointeesSteve Bannon, one of Trump's favorite Goldman Sachs bankers and someone who has conned conservatives from "We Build the Wall" to Jan6 — heads to jail and plays the martyr(2:16:15) INTERVIEW Shiva: SCOTUS Speech Case Was Rigged to FailDr. Shiva Ayyadurai, Shiva4President.com, ShatterTheSwarm.com, va_shiva on XThe recent trashing of Free Speech by the Supreme Court in Murthy vs Missouri.  Why was Shiva's case in Massachusetts not used with its clear government involvement in censorship?The debateWhat is "The Swarm"? No one in Washington is coming to save you so how can YOU fight it?Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

My car needed repairs, but I could only pay for half of them. An easy loan through Lamina.ca made the difference between stressed-out driving and a smooth ride to work. Mark went the extra mile on his repairs with a loan from Brokers Lamina at 1-800-NEW-CREDIT. It's easy to apply over the phone or online at Lamina.ca. Load up to $1,500 and get funds in an hour with no documents or credit checks and pay back over three to seven months. Prop up your purchase and apply for a loan now at lamina.ca. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 1st of July. Year of Our Lord 2024.

Well, today we're going to take a look at the debate. You know, the debate was on Thursday evening. And yet, since that time, everybody's been debating Biden, whether Biden should stay in or not. And so we're going to take a look at that. We're also going to take a look at the fact that there was no debate over any issue of importance. None whatsoever. We're going to go back and take a look. Everybody's all excited about biden and

it shows us that this myth of the super state run by a superman is designed to fail uh not what the founders had in mind so we're going to take a look at that we're also going to have dr shiva ayyadurai joining us in the third hour i wanted to get his take this should be interesting yeah we're going to follow the money we. I wanted to get his take. It should be interesting. Yeah, we're going to follow the money. We're also going to take a look at some Supreme Court decisions about the bureaucracy, the Chevron rule, as well as some other issues. We'll be right back. Well, as I just said, this debate of all things should have destroyed the idea

that we're going to get anything fixed in Washington. There's no savior. There's no Messiah. There's no benevolent dictator coming to save you folks. Neither of these two guys. And of course, the Democrats were scrambling around trying to figure out what they're going to do next. And we're going to talk about why they did this.

I actually mentioned it on friday the fact that they put this debate so early they knew what was going on they pretended that they didn't and now you see the mainstream media all over the place i mean the media establishment lays on the horn that's the headline from politico and we saw anderson cooper talking to la la harris i played this clip last Friday. But look at this. I got the point that you're making about a one and a half hour debate tonight. I'm talking about three and a half years of performance in work that has been historic.

But is that the man who we saw on the stage tonight? Is that the other guy on the debate stage the person that you saw on the debate stage that has for the last three and a half years up until today performed in a way that has been about whether it be in the oval office yeah okay so anderson cooper didn't know you know come on la la you work with them all come on Anderson, you report on him every day. You've had these people talk about his condition and they all knew. They all knew. They knew that he was going to be a big problem in this election.

So now they're moving to get him taken out. Just take a look at what Jon Stewart is doing with his audience. I don't know if this is canned laughter or if this is the real thing. How close the police are to him. Almost every police group in the nation from every state. He said, let's take a look at when he's not talking. And China, nothing. And Russia, nothing. And India, nothing. The blank stares.

He should have had him out a long time ago. Because I didn't have legislation. I said, close the border. We have the safest border in history. It's kind of like MAGA now, isn't it? Got to make an excuse for him. Not great. But, uh, I have resting 25th Amendment face. Yeah resting 25th Amendment face.

Yeah, 25th Amendment face. It's just 4-D chess. Come on, John. You can do what Alex did. When you're caught with these embarrassing situations about the guy that you've become a shill for, well, you just say, well, it's just 4-D chess. He's still a genius. And he's a stable genius.

He's not the only one talking about the 25th Amendment. We've actually got the guy who's running Pennsylvania, McCormick, who's running for Senate again. And he mentioned it. I don't think the Republicans want to put Lala Harris in there, do you? I mean, maybe they think they could beat her that's a pretty uh risky gamble uh to have uh that as the um person but you know they're going to set some general policy tones but look it's not going to change regardless of who they put in the people who are running our government are the cia in washington we're going to take a look at the Supreme Court case

that pushes back some on the bureaucratic state, the regulation without representation, taxation without representation. That was something that was put in way back in the Reagan administration. And it was put in because Reagan's EPA wanted to ease up some regulations. And so you had some environmental groups sue the EPA.

And the Supreme Court said, no, the EPA can do whatever it wants. And boy, that really opened up the precedent for a lot of things. That was 1986, you know, 1984 is 1986. So we had the Fauci precedent of immunity uh it doesn't necessarily help to have a conservative president there we have to stop this stuff at the state and local level washington has done it's been done all my life we've had presidents who were and of course reagan wasn't all that sharp in his second term. But he was prior to that.

And still he was run by the CIA, Bill Casey and other people. They helped to put him in with the Iran-Contra issue. The government is being run by the CIA. It's just that simple. There was a coup when they shot Kennedy. It's been that way ever since and if you don't understand that take a look at gina haspel and all the rest of the people look at how trump is afraid to criticize them afraid to criticize or fire fauci

biden has now been given one week to stand down by democrats and you got bar Barack Obama defending the president. You know, the people who want to get back in, and of course, not Barack, but Michelle, the people want to get back in, like Michelle Obama or like Gavin Newsom. They're portraying themselves right now as such loyal allies of Biden. They want to push them out. And again, it's a situation where the knives are out these

people do anything and everything to each other to get that position because there's a lot of money and power and all of that but for you and i their game of thrones is about them it's about their little fiefdom who gets to to rule over the pot of gold in washington this massive black hole that they bribed the world with uh i don't think when you look at replacing him now even trump is pulling back trump would like to run against biden because he'd like to get back in there and start you know collecting money and favors and things like that but those are playing nice now are really setting up things for the future newsome michelle and others uh barack obama bad night bad debate nights happen trust me i know but this election still choice between someone who's fought for ordinary folks his entire life yeah somebody who wants to take away your car

your range your air conditioning your heater you name it biden's like this grumpy old man get off my lawn you can't have that uh is uh but he's he's bought and paid for david plouffe who managed barack obama's 2008 presidential campaign told cnn it's kind of a defcon one moment they're three apart, but they seemed about 30 years apart tonight. So again, he can say that. Obama's not going to say it. And then David Axelrod, another Obama advisor. Very harsh criticism of Biden, but Obama's not going to say that. Axelrod said there are going to be discussions about whether or not he should continue.

Well, it's interesting to go back and look at the condition that he's in. And again, it is the type of thing where for the longest time, it was even going back to Rush. Trump put out a clip of the 2020 debate and it might have been in 2019 where biden seemed to be coherent there he was far more mentally awake and aware so there's been a lot of degradation in the last five or six years that happens to all of us i think is that we're either going to die or that's going to happen to us one way or the other the question though is can he see that will he pull back or is he and jill who's a good bit younger than him are they so

fascinated with power that they won't pull back you know biden spent seven days preparing for this nobody saw him for seven days it was actually an article on thursday daily mail biden seen for the first time in seven days so who was running the country right you want to go back to this idea that biden or trump are running the country that they're vital that their input is necessary they're not they're figureheads they're vital, that their input is necessary? They're not. They're figureheads. They're just puppets that are out there. And, you know, sometimes you can see who's pulling the strings.

Sometimes it's like the beginning of 2001. Remember that? Where they had the guys in the monkey suits and kind of spoil the whole thing where you could see the zippers in the back of their suit? Well, I think we saw the zippers. And we saw the zippers for both of them. Trump did not have a good debate either. He was evasive.

He was meandering and non-responsive on key issues. And of course, CNN isn't going to ask any key questions either. But nobody paid any attention to what Trump said. We're going to take a look at some of the things that were said, some of the things that were not even asked, of course. But you know, when you're voting for a president, you're voting for a group of people around him that you don't even see. And Colonel Douglas McGregor has said that.

He said, you can now see that the government is being run by some people in the background, but you don't vote for. Yeah, Biden finally broke cover on Thursday afternoon after spending seven days holed up at Camp David, preparing for the debate that night. And so the question is, when you even talk about mental competence, is that going to be a deal killer for the American public? Take a look at Fetterman going back to the last election cycle when he became senator. Now, here's what I think we have to fight about inflation here right now.

That's what we need to fight about inflation. We all have to make sure that everyone that works is able to, that's the most American bargain, that if you work full-time, you should be able to live in dignity as well. True. You know, but going to those kind of vocational schools, able to create a career to, excuse me, to wage a lot of high salary, and again, supporting to reduce those costs are critical too yeah well you know and of course who is he debating oz that was trump's pick a guy who's not even fully an american citizen divided loyalties still a citizen of turkey i will renounce my turkish citizenship if i'm he said, so that I can get access to classified documents. That was who Trump supported.

And then on the other side, you had Fetterman. Just like we see in the presidential race, there's nothing here to choose. So Joe Biden taking flak for urging Joe to carry on. As a matter of fact, I uh what babel and b had was perfect this is joe biden uh yelling and screaming joe biden refuses to drop out of presidential race he's just kind of staring off into space i think this was the rally that they had after the debate at a rally in north carolina uh but that says it all doesn't it it's joe biden because you know we go back and we look at the very beginning of the biden administration she was accompanying

bill to g7 at the time and she put this out on social media here i am i'm on air force one and i'm prepping for the g7 what does she have to do what she got all this paperwork there for um you know who is president i don't think it's her but she thinks it's her quite frankly i think it's the cia that's there uh but there is a cabal of people around him colonel mcgregor biden's cognitive decline makes it obvious that the u.s government is in quote unelected hands makes it clear we've known that but it makes it clear so um as reason magazine had said what if they have a really really bad debate as they did they said this could be a good thing to try to get people away from the idea that Washington is going to fix our problem. That these guys know what they're doing, that they can make a difference to rein in this massive bureaucracy.

President Biden is not fit to discharge the immense duties of the presidency, wrote Colonel McGregor. Yet his enablers and his political allies continue to exploit the president to substitute their destructive agenda for the interests of the presidency, wrote Colonel McGregor, yet his enablers and his political allies continue to exploit the president to substitute their destructive agenda for the interests of the American people. It's all about money. It's all about who they pay off. As Grammy for God says, they already know who will replace

Biden. It's all about the timing. Exactly. They wanted to replace him, and that's why they've never had the presidential debates until well after the nominating conventions. Do you realize that neither Trump nor Biden are nominated? Neither of them. They are the presumptive nominees because we didn't have a primary. Because they didn't debate anybody along the way. First debate for both of them.

What are they afraid of? We saw. What a train wreck they are. They don't want to debate anybody. They don't want to have any primaries. The Democrat Party even shut down challengers in Florida. So they wanted to get rid of him. The people around him have got a lock on that party. And I don't think they are going to get rid of him. The people around him have got a lock on that party,

and I don't think they are going to get rid of him. That's my guess. And I'll tell you why. Again, it's going back to money. It doesn't matter who this guy is. As long as he is alive, they'll prop him up like we can at Bernie's. They did that, by the way, with Brezhnev. I'll tell you about that in just a moment uh but

this is not a theory this is something that happens when you have a highly centralized authoritarian government like we have like they had at the soviet union we have that same kind of government today in washington uh so this is something that's been there for a long time. They wanted to set this up again. You would usually have the nominating conventions in August. And then you have the first presidential debate at the end of September, as I mentioned on Friday. And then usually there was three of them. So it'd be one at the very end of September, one in the middle of October, one at the end of October, just before the election. This time, they have one debate a couple months before they're going to have, maybe about six weeks before they have the nominating convention,

they have the debate. They're not even the nominees. Then they're going to have the second debate right at the beginning of September, and that's it. Very different. Destructive executive orders, says McGregor, and policy directives, many of which were likely signed when Biden was in a rapidly diminished state of mind, inflicted tremendous damage on our nation.

Well, we could say the same thing about Trump. And we could say, unable to discharge the immense duties. These immense duties were usurped. It was never the design of the founders to have these kind of immense duties and immense powers focused in Washington, let alone in one man. And this is what even conservatives don't understand anymore, is how we have created a Caesar. We crossed the Rubicon a long time ago in the Potomac, and we now have a Caesar there. And guess what?

These Caesars and this declining empire are kind of along the line of Caligula and some of these other idiots that occupied the office. And it was an intense competition there. You know, they were stabbing each other in the back, literally. Here, it's not come exactly to that yet. So Biden's manipulators fueled a proxy war in Ukraine, says McGregor, that risks drawing us into a catastrophic confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia.

Their unqualified support for Israel's disproportionate actions in Gaza erodes our moral authority and credibility as a champion of peace and stability. Well, I generally agree with General McGregor. But I got to say, not in my lifetime. He's about a decade older than me, but I've never seen Washington as a paragon of

moral authority, credibility, and a champion of peace and stability. My entire life, Washington has been initiating wars without even having a real declaration. I haven't seen it as a champion of peace and stability. It would be nice for a change, but I haven't seen that. He says it's time to ask who governs this country.

Have we surrendered controlled, unelected bureaucrats? Yes. Sprawling federal agencies yes affluent donors who do not have the best interests of americans at heart these are obviously rhetorical questions uh we know the answer to all of those and as i said before brezhnev brezhnev historian says actually died in 76 but he continued on for another six or so years. He suffered clinical death in January 1976, but was revived and ruled in a virtual daze for six more years.

After Brezhnev's 1976 stroke, he gradually found it more and more difficult to carry out the most simple protocol functions and could no longer understand what was going on around him. He was largely kept in power by corrupt officials in his entourage who knew they were safe while he remained president and Communist Party General Secretary. Because, you know, in Soviet Union, in Soviet Union, when you are out of power, the other guys might come for you. Kind of what we've been seeing from the Soviet collective known as the Biden administration. They come after those people who they defeated in the last election.

Kind of like what we see with Zelensky, isn't it? Arresting the people that he defeated in the last election. Brezhnev, who became party leader in 1964 after the removal of Khrushchev, died in November 1982. The period of his rule is now officially condemned as one of social and economic stagnation. Well, all communist rule is really that way. And the problem is, and what I'd like to try to get across to people, is that when you look at this debate, you understand the futility of central control of a strong leader. That is a Soviet system. It always results in social and economic stagnation.

That's a hallmark of that. And when we look at the Biden administration, oh, it's run by a bunch of people who are around him. We don't know who all of them are. But again, that is, they're ultimately controlled by the CIA. But when we look at it, it's a Soviet system, a committee. And the bureaucracies are like that as well. I'll just throw this in as a side thing here. Brezhnev, before he had the stroke, was a big fan of American Westerns.

Nobody seems to be a big fan of American Westerns. Horizon didn't do too well at the box office anymore. But he was a big fan of American Westerns, and his favorite was The Rifleman. And he was able to come to the U.S. in 1973, and he met Chuck Connors. Now, Chuck Connors is, it looks like he's staying a little bit closer to the camera, but he is a gigantic guy. He was really big. He played baseball and basketball, and a really tall guy. So when he came, he wanted to meet chuck connor's rifleman

and chuck connor's gave him he said here's some pistols that i used on the tv show i guess the joke was on bryce neff because the rifleman didn't have pistols he had rifles so these are the, these are the pistols that I never needed to use as a character on the rifleman. Uh, so yeah, that was, that was the guy, uh, that they had ruling them. And I can imagine Joe Biden being really excited to get the pistols of the rifleman as well. Anyway, uh, Simon Foster, thank you so much for the tip and the progress retort thank you he says david i'm leary the chevron defense ruling while we're celebrating there again loading the deck with rationale disband scotus let's give you a bump out of the gate this month thank you very much and i want to say thank you to everybody uh the end of the month uh i we

continue to get things over the weekend and um we're up to seven eights so that's where we finish the month uh we moved it up there we'll leave it there even though today is the first we'll leave it there so people who follow it can see but thank you all for doing that for us and helping the program a syrian girl what's the alternative at the moment? Lala and the White House are better off with an unconscious president than out and out fool. Well, again, the alternative is that we start to do things at the local and state level. That's where we've got to focus our effort. And we've got to stop letting them redirect us to Washington. That's why I'm covering this, to see the futility of this. We've got to stop letting them redirect us to Washington.

That's why I'm covering this, to see the futility of this. But we can get things done at the local level. You know, when Biden did the pistol brace, and of course, Trump did it as well. He put it on and took it off because of the election thing. But he put it on in 2019, take it off in 2020. But when they did their gun control by executive order, or pistol brace, for example, they fixed it here in Tennessee. They said, you're not going to ban anything that we've explicitly made legal, and they did it.

And they said, furthermore, we're not going to let you enforce this law. You can't commandeer us. You can't force us to do this the way the government operates is by bribery and blackmail financial bribery financial blackmail if this if you get people at the state level who don't want to take that you know they love to get that money because then they can hand it out as bribery and as blackmail they can go to people and say look at what we just gave you the money to build or what we built for you and that type of thing.

If we can get past that, the people at the state and local level, then we don't have to sell our heritage of freedom for a bowl of soup, which is what these people are offering us. Dougalog, Biden walking away from the debate stage was riveting. Will he negotiate the steps or will he fall? And you had President Jill come to get him down and rescue him.

Psalm 144, thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. I'd like to say, when I drove a truck on train bridges, there were thousands of corn pops all over the country in democracy. Oh, and you know the thing. Thanksid starting my new job on wednesday god bless you and everyone out there well that's great to hear congratulations i'm glad that you were able to find a new job soon i know you would probably like to have had it even sooner than it was uh m sellers my maga aunt was so happy that prayers have been answered because trump did great

and held it together without being rude and blew by no way in the debate her perspective wasn't even reality yeah we're going to talk about what he had to say and the questions that were there again what happened was nobody just nobody saw how bad he was. And if they replace somebody else, then it's going to make him look bad. But look, the elections are so corrupt. I mean, here's MAGA, who's been telling us for the last four years that the elections were stolen. They think they've got a handle on it this time. It isn't going to happen.

I watched elections be stolen my entire life. And it was Trump who let them or pushed them either way where whatever your perspective is to do this vote by mail stuff in the first place they did that with him as president you think that they can do anything to clean up the elections when he's not present i mean he was either a fool or a tool to allow that kind of stuff to happen in 2020. You think it's going to be any better? So, again, the election at this level doesn't really matter. They've already made their selection.

These people are just, the whole thing is a pageant. Go back to Wag the Dog, remember that? He said, think of it as a pageant. That's the way I think of it. Narrow Egg Narrogate Ministries. How can a man who's president not be fit to stand trial, thus no charges are filed, yet he is fit to run the country? These evil miscreants are so exposed and in the open both sides. Yeah.

We're not going to prosecute him for the obvious corruption. We're going to talk more about the corruption. Even more stuff has come out. Atomic Dog, David, can you tell us what your schedule will be this week? Yes, we're going to take Wednesday and Thursday off. We'll have rebroadcasts, probably have a live show, but either live show or rebroadcast on Thursday and Friday. I want to, before they take it

out of the theaters i want to see horizon so that's what i'm going to celebrate for the july doing something traditional like that uh i hope it's a good film but um i think that uh whenever i see that critics hate something and hate it because it is so traditional it's like i think i better see that so anyway uh no other plans besides that but just to rest of it uh i'm sellers i think people have given up and think this is the best we have to choose from and there's no one else to vote for then there's the maga crazies very few actually know what's going on well that's just it you know again if we could that the positives that could come out of this is for us to realize that we're not going to fix these problems in washington certainly at least not this time but the whole idea of an all-powerful benevolent dictator in washington

that the left and the right have now bought into 100%. That must be destroyed. And maybe that won't even happen with this. But it should happen as we look at this. People should get an idea as to what is really going on. And we need to not put all of our effort into Washington. Again, Musk said, look at what Soros is doing. He's focusing on local elections, local district attorneys. Sometimes he gives money to state district attorneys.

Why is he doing that? Because he wants to change society. How do you change society? All politics is local. Soros knows that. Musk knows that. Maybe they know something we don't. You know, these guys are a couple of the richest people in the world.

And they got rich by analyzing and manipulating government. Elon Musk did it with all the different government contracts that he got. Soros did it the same way. He busted the Bank of England because he knew what the central bankers and the politicians were going to do, and he outmaneuvered them. These guys know how to do this. We need to wise up and stop being suckers stop focusing on the the presidential race i guess why i want to get

shiva adurai on because he talks about ground up decision bottom up uh changes and that's really what we need to uh need to focus on we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show octo spook says trump did great it wasn't even debate you can't debate at least meaningfully with a simpleton like biden cnn worked hard to block rfk jr it would have been a debate then accepting biden uh yeah it would have like i said from the very beginning there's a lot of things that i disagree with rfk jr on i would not vote for him but at least he would bring up these topics and they'd have a discussion a lot of things that were not brought up for example i got the transcript from the debate i looked to uh see when they discussed certain keywords uh for example they never

mentioned pfizer zero mentions of that moderna no mrna no mask no ventilator no fauci no cdc no No. Fauci? No. CDC? No. Guns? No. Many, many things like that. They basically talked about themselves, if they could talk at all. Biden couldn't. They did mention vaccine, but not much. Listen to the context and what was said about vaccines. And this is all that was said about vaccines, folks. Trump said, well, we got hit with COVID. We did a lot to fix it.

I gave him an unbelievable situation with all the therapeutics and all the things that we came up with, you know, things like masks and ventilators and a program being run out of CMS to bribe hospitals to say that people had COVID, put them on ventilators and kill them, give them remdesivir, other things like that.

We gave him something great. Remember, more people died under his administration. You know why? Because he was giving people your shot, Trump. Even though we had largely fixed it. Yeah, you did. More people died under his administration than our administration. We were right in the middle of it.

Something which a lot of people didn't like to talk about. But he had far more people dying in his administration. He did the mandate, which is a disaster. Mandating it. The vaccine went out. He did a mandate which is a disaster mandating it the vaccine went out he did a mandate on the vaccine which is the thing that people most objected to about the vaccine i think the thing they most objected to was death disability and the ongoing health issues of these things. I think they objected not just to having their decisions about the vaccine taken away. I think people objected to being called non-essential.

I think they objected to having their job or their business taken away. I think they objected to being treated like prisoners when there wasn't even any pretense of quarantining sick people. What they did with lockdown was not quarantine. You quarantine people if they are identified as being sick. This is pre-crime, pre-crime, crime of being sick, supposedly. He did a very poor job, just a very poor job that's it that's what was said about the vaccines now trump biden doesn't mention it at all at all but trump pretends that the people dying and we know when they died they died in third quarter fourth quarter of 2021 that's when it spiked because that's when his shot went out. And then when it comes to climate, Dana Bash says, well, another persistent challenge is the crisis, climate crisis.

2023 was the hottest year in recorded history. False. Communities across the country are confronting the devastating effects of extreme heat intensifying wildfires stronger hurricanes and rising sea levels every bit of that's a lie every bit of that is a lie i've covered this repeatedly um it's but anyway she goes to trump he doesn't correct any of this stuff uh president trump you vowed to end your opponent's climate initiatives but will you take any action as president to slow the climate crisis and trump says there is no climate crisis this is all just an invention to steal your money and to lock you down and to starve you no he didn't say that uh trump says well let me get back to what

he said about the police how close the police are to him almost every police group in the nation from every state is supporting donald j trump he doesn't use that moment to defend us from the climate mcguffin the thing that is key now the thing that is preeminent even more more so than the pandemic, although they may switch it back and forth. They can go back and forth between these two things. He does nothing to defend us. And he's got a, you know, when you look at the people that he's lined up here to be vice president, one of them, Doug Burgum, one of the others from way back when until she bragged about shooting her dog, was Kristi Noem. The governors of North and South Dakota, both of them heavily involved in this

summit pipeline, this unbelievably idiotic scheme to pump CO2 across the nation to mess up people's lives, to mess up their homes, their farms with eminent domain, so they can pump CO2 into the ground in North and South Dakota. And both these governors are in on it. And, of course, the guy who is the CEO of that pipeline has been to events at Mar-a-Lago. This is more climate nonsense. This is as bad, as corrupt as anything that Bill Gates does.

And Trump and Burgum and Noem are in on it. It's disgusting to see this stuff. And when he gets asked a question about climate, what does he do? He dodges it. Well, let's talk about me. Let's talk about people who endorse me. What are you going to do about crime? As if that was a presidential responsibility.

Got to solve all crimes everywhere, right? Get out your deer stocking hat and your cape and your magnifying glass. You're going to solve all the crimes everywhere as president because that's what they you know there's any problem in america needs to be solved by washington more specifically by the president this is the mindset that cnn wants to sell you this is the mindset that everybody's bought into so what are you going to do about that well what are you going to do about crime assuming that it was something that the president has in his job description of the constitution anyway well his response would be well the police unions love me and he talked to biden what are you going to do about the border well the border patrol loves me by and then trump says no they

love me neither one of them have done anything about the border what are you going to do about abortion well you know those evangelical, they really love me. Do you see a pattern here? Is every issue about them and how they can attach it to some group and say, hey, I've got the right position on this because I'm loved by the police union or the border patrol or the evangelicals or whatever. That's what they do with every one of these issues. So she comes back and she presses him on this.

She says, 38 seconds left. President Trump, will you take any action as president to slow the climate crisis? The climate crisis, which is believed by slow people. Trump, well, I want absolutely immaculate clean water oh there we go he wants clean water that's great biden evidently doesn't want clean water uh and i want absolutely clean air and we had it we had h2o he says wow they had h2o did you realize that it was trump who gave us water no wonder they call him the messiah the chosen one he gave us h2o this is what i'm saying if it had been anybody other than biden who's just staring out into space

everybody be talking about what trump said we had immaculate clean water absolutely clean air we had h2o we had the best numbers ever we were get we were using all formats of energy all forms everything all forms of energy he said i had the best environmental numbers ever and my top environmental people gave me that statistic just before i walked out the stage actually of course he doesn't cite any statistics like maybe you can't remember those numbers i don't know total incoherent rambling bolshevik he avoids the climate gaslighting issue altogether. I'm for clean air and clean water.

We had H2O when I was president. Biden responds, I don't know where the hell he's been. The idea that Dana, he said is true. I've passed the most extensive. It was the most extensive climate change legislation in history. In history. And by the way, black colleges. I came up with $50 billion for historic black universities and colleges.

Here we go. Just pivot off to something else. And by the way, while we're talking about climate change, let's change the subject to black colleges. Why? In a sense, there's a certain kind of logic there. Why? Well, because both DEI and ESG are something that his administration has been primarily focused on to virtue signal to its supporters. So, yeah, I can see where those two would be linked in his mind.

And then he says, and he had not done a damn thing with the environment he said he out of the paris peace accord i mean climate accord i immediately joined it because if we reach for one and a half degrees celsius at any one point again this is i'm reading it verbatim if we reach for this he he says, well, there is no way back. No way back. He said, the only existential threat to humanity is climate change. Wow. So the pandemic is no more, is never existential threat.

I mean, we still got the WHO and Robert Redfield and all these people telling us it's another existential threat to us. A nuclear war that you're pushing, that's's another existential threat to us a nuclear war that you're pushing that's not an existential threat to us you want to talk about global warming talk about your jets and your bombs and your nuclear war no he doesn't talk about any of that uh but he's going to genuflex to these signals of virtue that are there and again the paris peace accord uh trump comes back with that the paris accord he said this is trump was going to cost us trillion a trillion dollars and china nothing it was a rip-off for the united states and i ended it no you didn't uh you kept it going for the entire four years that you were there

again he got out of it quote unquote got out of it we were never in it folks that was gaslighting too you don't get into an accord into a treaty if it hasn't been ratified it was all pretense nobody ratified it john kerry said barack and i have self-ratified this back in 2015. we did it we ratified it we did you know fortunately i don't need the uh i don't need the congress to do gun control i don't need the congress to do a treaty ratification you know same kind of stuff that trump said with gun control they said with the treaty ratification so it wasn't a legitimate treaty but he pretended that he had gotten into it and then he had to go through a proscribed series of steps

to get out of it and we were out of the paris climate accord if you want to call it that for less than two months because trump never got out of it and they continued to use that uh so then biden we were the only ones of consequence who are not members of the paris accord for two whole months all of this stuff is nonsense and then they get to a little bit about prescription drugs biden said no by to a little bit about prescription drugs. Biden said, no, by the way, with regard to prescription drugs, one company agreed that they would reduce the price to $35, which I was calling for, one voluntarily.

I made sure every company in the world, every pharmaceutical company, cannot have to pay. What does that mean? He made sure that every pharmaceutical company in the world cannot have to pay uh and there was some drug somewhere that he negotiated down to 35 dollars he says well even if that's true he doesn't know what it was and yet both he and trump gave pfizer moderna other companies tens of billions of dollars. Gave Johnson & Johnson manufacturing facility.

That's what Trump did. Gave these guys all kinds of money. Gave them the formula that had been worked out by DARPA years ago. Said, we'll deliver it for you with the military. No legal liability. I mean, you think about that it why are the leftist socialists not outraged at this that's one of the worst pieces of crony capitalism i've ever seen in my life tens of billions of dollars to poison people then when it comes to the war, Putin, Ukraine, Trump,

as you heard, when Putin saw that, talking about Afghanistan pullout, when Putin saw that, he said, you know what? I think we're going to go in and maybe take my this was his dream. Now, that was not Biden. That was Trump. Again,

the way the both of them talk. Yeah, Trump is not going to address this. I'm going to take issue with his masters, with the CIA. He's not going to talk about the coup in Ukraine. None of that. And so Dana Bash says, well, I'm going to come back to you for one minute. I just want to go back to my original question, which is, are Putin's terms acceptable to you, keeping the territory in Ukraine? She says that to Trump.

It says, no, they're not acceptable. No, they're not acceptable. So, how is he going to achieve peace in one day if he doesn't accept Putin's terms? Do you really believe any of the promises that he's made? He's given 200. Now he starts talking about the money that Biden has given to Ukraine. He's given $200 billion now or more to Ukraine. He's given $200 billion.

That's a lot of money. Well, Trump, why don't you talk to mike johnson he seems to be hanging on to your coattails he seems to be hanging on every word you didn't use any of your influence to stop this latest massive spending bill giving money to ukraine you use none of your influence at all for that he He does contact the people and Congress and lobby them for this or that, but he didn't do anything to stop the funding of Ukraine. He didn't do anything to make sure that they were going to put money at the border. Could it be that Trump would like for there to be chaos and disorder

to help him get in as president? Because that's what reagan and his cia handler bill casey did with the hostage situation in iran uh actually had casey go to iran work out the details in advance of what was going to happen with the iran-contra situation and tell them don't release these hostages until after Reagan takes office. And then we'll work with you on the spare parts for the jets that we gave the Shah of Iran. Things like that. Yeah, they are not working in the best interest of our country.

They're working in their best interests. And so, again, Mike Johnson, Trump doesn't put any pressure to stop any of this stuff. But he says, this is Trump again, every time that Zelensky comes to this country, he walks away with $60 billion. He's the greatest salesman ever. Then listen to this. And I'm not knocking him.

I'm not knocking anything. Why? He doesn't want to go head-to-head with the CIA who's really the ones pushing this you know Biden is doing it but he doesn't want to he'll criticize some of the way that's being run but he's not going to go to the root of the issue because then he'd be going head-to-head with his CIA masters. So I'm not knocking Zelensky.

I'm not knocking him. I'm only saying, just saying, just asking for a friend. I don't know. So he says, and I will have that war settled between Putin and Zelensky as president-elect before I take office. I'll have that war settled. Wow. So he's not even going to do it in one day when he becomes president. He's going to do it before he becomes president.

Well, what are you waiting for? If you can do it before you become president, why don't you do it now? So we don't have to worry about this kicking into a nuclear war. Well, because he's just blowing hot air. And because even if he could do something, just like Reagan, he would wait and use it for his own personal advantage. Do you think he'll stop when he takes Ukraine, says Biden? What do you think happens to Poland? What do you think happens to Belarus?

What do you think happens to those NATO countries? Here's the domino theory for dummies again in case you never figured that out in the 1960s this domino theory stuff okay and uh again talking about nato trump wants to get us out of nato our nato allies have produced as much funding for ukraine as we have and of course that's what trump was doing when he talked about well we need to get out of nato he was just telling them you got to get your spending up or we're going to get out what trump was doing during his term was he was getting the european countries to ramp up their military budget to prepare for this conflict which was planned which was planned the rest of it she said yeah it's got three years

before it happened in 2022 we're going to have a bigger war with russia you think maybe they're planning it on both sides was there a conspiracy on both sides to do this um so it was never about getting out of nato trump is only about ramping up NATO's spending. I'm Marty. Hey Marty. Thank you for the tip and thank you for helping. Uh, he says here's movie snack bar, popcorn. Thank you. And Dustin Helm.

Thank you very much for the tip. Uh, my son says that Trump says Slonsky steals billions of taxpayer dollars every time he visits. Not that that's a bad thing. I just think it's very impressive. impressive as an example for all of us politicians yeah exactly right exactly right yeah not a bad thing i'm not i'm not i'm not knocking it i think it's good if you can rip off the american taxpayer for 60 billion dollars israel does it all the time why can't Zelensky do it as well, right? Yeah.

DG8. David, they'll install whomever they can get their agenda through. No way the COVID nonsense gets legs under Biden. People are too busy making excuses. Trust the plan. Keep your enemies closer. 3D chess. That's right.

It's going to be easier for them now to switch it back out again. And so here's what I would say. Look at this stuff. And we'll talk to Shiva Dure today. He did the same thing that RFK Jr. did, which was to, in live format, give his answers to the questions, so forth. But if I was on the stage with him, I would get those two old men, I'd say, you both killed children with your shots. Now, you may not answer for this in this lifetime, but you're going to stand before God and you will answer for that.

I'm confident of that. Top scientists confirm COVID shots cause heart attacks in children. Heart attacks in children. And these people have the audacity to talk about, yeah, that was the mandates, that was the bad. No, the bad thing, Benedict Donald, was the fact that you gave heart attacks to children. Never happened before you. Never happened before you never happened before you

maybe we should call it Trump itis Trump a diet is instead of a pair card diet us or myocarditis is Trump diet is a comprehensive study by leading pediatric scientists has confirmed the devastating surge in heart failure among children is caused by the mRNA shots. A peer-reviewed study published in the prestigious journal Med, conducted by scientists at the University of Hong Kong. They uncovered evidence to confirm that natural killer cell activation by mRNA injections causes the pathogenesis of acute myocarditis. Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that restricts the body's ability to pump blood. This inflammation can

cause strokes, cardiac arrest, and can ultimately cause sudden death. Before Trump, and before the Trump shot, before his killer shot, we never had a prerequisite in any schools of requiring kids to get an EKG, electrocardiogram, before they could play sports. Now you've got a lot of school districts that are doing it. A lot of others don't care. They just drop dead. It just happens. It's normal now. Just like autism is normal after Reagan and Fauci.

Now after Trump and Fauci, heart attacks in kids are normal. That's what these people have given us. Autism, giving our kids autism, heart attacks. Have you had enough of these people? I am so disgusted with this idea that we're going to fix Washington

with either Democrats or Republicans or with any politician of any party. Washington has to be reduced in size. It is a tumor. It is a metastasizing cancer itself. The study concludes that mRNA shots massively increase the risk of myocarditis among children and young people, especially males. And you know why they focus on that? Children, young people.

Why? Well, because whenever you have somebody who's older that drops dead suddenly, it was their age. It was their age. But when all this fantasy was being pushed by Trump and his administration, people who had multiple, people who were at or beyond life expectancy, who had multiple comorbidities on average two and a half. And this is the same data that we had for two weeks out of Italy before Trump locked us down. And then we found that it

was exactly the same everywhere else. These are people who died, again, past life expectancy, also had two and a half comorbidities, but it was always COVID that killed them. Always COVID. And so when you have somebody who dies of a heart attack, well, even though they got a comorbidity of having the vaccine, that doesn't count. It had to be something other than the vaccine.

They can't deny it with children and with young people. That's something we've never, ever seen before. And so that is the big issue. That's why they're focusing on this. But it's not just killing children and young people. It's killing people of all ages. Trump is. Trump is still killing people.

And he is celebrated by the MAGA crowd. It just blows my mind. Never will I celebrate this man. Never. He needs to be in jail for the rest of his life. He and the people around him. The study's co-lead scientist, a specialist pediatrician at the University of Hong Kong, collected and analyzed samples from 60 adolescents with vaccine-related myocarditis.

You know, they had this big debate and the Trump people got so angry because Biden said, I never, no soldiers died in my administration. So we forgot the 13 that got killed in Afghanistan. This is just in Hong Kong, 60 adolescents who died from heart attacks with mRNA, just in Hong Kong, just in Hong Kong. How many tens of millions of people have Biden and Trump killed, poisoned? These backstabbing poisoners, Trump and Biden, disgust me. Yeah, he doesn't remember the 13 soldiers that died because of his incompetence in getting out of Afghanistan

when they lost. But he doesn't even care and will not admit to the tens of millions of people that he's killed, including children with heart attacks. Neither of them. The findings were

compared with samples from 10 vaccinated individuals without myocarditis and 10 healthy controls the study team investigated the previously rare but now very common vaccine related myocarditis so again he brought that to the world another thing they were totally silent about was gun control, gun control. Nothing talked about the pandemic, nothing of any substance, just some boasting about vaccines from Trump and attacking Biden on the mandates. You know, Trump has finally picked up on the talking points that the MAGA crowd was using to give cover to this murder.

And it wasn't just the MAGA crowd. They were getting it from people like Alex Jones and Wayne Allen Root and all these, you know, prostitutes and parasites that have attached themselves to this MAGA cult and Donald Trump. And so they regurgitated a lot of, he regurgitated some of that stuff, but they had no discussion of it. They had no discussion of what's going to happen to our ability to own cars or to eat meat, nothing about any of that stuff.

Why were guns absent during the presidential debate? Well, again, that's a rhetorical question because both of these guys, these two guys, the only two presidents who've tried to do gun control by executive order. And even Trump's Supreme Court slapped him down on it. When Surgeon General Vivek Murthy declared so-called gun violence a public health emergency so close to the debate tom knighton at uh bearing arms said i figured he was trying to set the stage for president biden to swoop in and make a stand on an issue that democrats really seem to think they can win on but then it didn't happen yeah then it didn't happen well um doug

thank you very much for the tip he says thank you david and crew let's all hit the like buttons and help spread the word yes thank you for helping us thank you for reminding me to remind people uh you know it was interesting i uh people talking about the censorship i had a couple of articles about censorship i thought well let me just go back and look in the search engine and see if what happens i type in david knight journalist and uh i did it in brave brave has got now an ai connection where it puts stuff together that gets interesting results and google and so i looked at them and the first hit was a guy who is a david, who is a journalist professor, I think somewhere in the Pacific Northwest. And my Twitter did not show up, but his did. I looked at it.

How many followers has he got? 900. You know, on Twitter, I've had now since they shadow banned me six years ago, 2018. I've been stuck at 136,000. But I had 136,000 and I had interaction with people before they banned me. Nothing has changed since then. Even to the extent that somebody with my name who has 900 followers care and said, I've even got more followers than that.

Somebody who has 900 followers turns up in the search engines before I do. So we're heavily banned. And again, we really do need your help to try to spread the word. Liking the program, some of that stuff does help. It helps on the podcast things. And it's difficult to stand out the podcast when there are so many different podcasts. And there's some that are being promoted heavily by the platforms you know spotify pushes joe rogan significantly of course they pay him 25 million a year or something like that and they won't even let me on spotify the biggest

podcast platform i can't even get the program on so it does help more on these other ones you know the one that comes up first is deezer deezer comes up first very interesting but uh yeah um the other thing that i thought was really strange was said um the only thing that it said about me first of all it kind of conflated uh me with this journalism professor and but then when it started talking about me and how I had been at Infowars, it said that I had interviewed Alexander Dugan and I had written an article and it gave the name of an article and wherever his publication was, all of that was fictitious. That's what artificial intelligence is good for.

It can make up all that stuff but i think it also is uh kind of highlights who i believe is behind all this censorship especially mine i think that it is the intelligence community that is behind all the censorship they designed the internet for this stuff jcr lick lighter and others designed it as a psychological manipulation tool. They were running and had their own venture capital firm, made it public. The CIA did, In-Q-Tel. They had people, CIA, NSA, other intelligence agencies, had people all over these venture capital boards

to determine who the competitors were going to be and then let them fight it out amongst themselves, may the best person win, but they're going to give them the money for that they have been behind all of this stuff from the very beginning and when you look at the 2018 censorship when they took us off at info wars and when they then two months later before the midterm elections of trump they took off 800 sites and they were not for the part, the majority of them were not Trump supporters. But they were against the police state and the surveillance state. So you want to know who's censoring people?

It's the police state and the surveillance state. It's the people that they censor. You can pretty much tell going back and looking at that. Carlos Rex, thank you very much for the tip. And Brian Taylor, thank you. And he writes, I was listening to a guy yesterday talking about the media going after alex jones and basically said anyone who called out alex for being controlled opposition was a basement dweller no actually i dwelt with him actually i was roommate if you want to talk about it so i think i've got i know what

i'm talking about i just love it when people tell me you don't know anything about it's like i worked closely with him for about a decade okay uh i don't get how people don't see he is controlled opposition as you pointed out it says the vax is sugar water yeah yeah you might look at the fact that he brags about how many people in his family are in the cia as well to me that's the big tell. Uh, handy. Yeah. We had a 17 year old high school kid drop dead playing flag football. Yeah. Thanks Trump. Biden.

That's up to you guys. That's on your, that's on your punch ticket. You know, it's interesting. You know, when you look at the Bible, both Old and New Testament, it always talks about God and having a set of books over and over again, talks about that. And I think it's interesting. And of course, you know, you can interpret these near-death experiences any way that you want to interpret them. There was one guy who was a Christian pastor. He said, if you go back and some of these were really pretty amazing people from different culture

and they saw these things that pretty amazing people from different culture, and they saw these things that were not at all like their culture. It wasn't something that they were imagining because it was totally alien to them. And certain things would be said. And they were like, what was that about? And then they just might, by accident, be invited into some kind of a church service or something. And then when they come in, it's what was said at that point in time. Now, we base what we're looking at and what our hope and confidence is in something solid. And that's the Bible is the Word of God.

And I have a lot of confidence in that for a lot of different reasons. There's internal things that you can have confidence in, that that is God who is speaking to us. Prophecies are fulfilled. Archaeological things are fulfilled. But this one guy said, you know, I think some of this NDE stuff, near-death experiences, might be a kind of new apologetic for us. In other words, that's something, just as we used to not have archaeology as an apologetic,

we used to not have DNA as an apologetic. And what made me think about that when I see that is people would always say they met this guy with a book in his hand or something. And over and over again, both Old Testament and New Testament, it's always there, God recording both the good and the bad. We were just reading last night in Habakkuk, and this is really rough criticism of the people that were there, Israel at that point in time.

And then it says at the very end of it that some of the people took note of what was said. They were going to change what they were doing. And it said a book was written. And the book was written in those people's names. You know, God pays attention to what we do. You're going to answer to God one day. Now, we've all already blown that.

And unless you've got something to forgive your sins through Christ, you've already blown that opportunity. But if you are there, and if you have taken care of sins, you can't do good to erase that. There's not anything that's going to erase that except for the blood of Christ. And if you, once we die,

we're all going to stand in front of God. And the good and bad is going to be there. And guess what? The good isn't going to out in front of god and the good and bad is going to be there and guess what the good isn't going to outweigh the bad but you can know that the good is going to outweigh the bad if it's christ's works on your behalf that's that's uh just a pathetic um future awaiting you uh but um you can know that the good outweighs the bad if the good is christ's good that is on your side only if you're a follower of christ but everybody's going to have those books open good and bad um so atomic dog um in my whole um in my whole one only knew of one person with myocarditis now i hear about it all the time

not a coincidence that's right it's become a household word, just like autism. Myocarditis, pericarditis even as well. Bias Love says, and they want to increase uses of mRNA in children's scheduled vaccines. So many people do not see it. As a matter of fact, so many people do see it in a sense that the CDC has now added the COVID vaccines to the childhood vaccine schedule. And they approved it and pushing it for everybody. Everybody before we get to fall. is cdc pushing this stuff now remember the cdc this woman who's in charge of it she was the north carolina department of health person she said i get on the phone i call up my friends in other states are you gonna let them do this oh well then neither am i what about that

okay well i guess we'll let them do that. Yeah, science, right? Science. Johnny Freedom. I'm seeing people in their 50s dropping like flies. Otherwise healthy. Handy. I saw more young people die suddenly in one week during the jab rollout than I had ever seen. 18 years in EMS had only two die like that.

I had three in one week at one point. That's what I mean. And these guys just, you know, nobody asked them that question, but they will be asked that question. Cervantes Galan, I was on Twitter for about four years and never grew my subs more than 1,800 followers before they nuked me January the 8th, 2021. I tried to appeal it on Elon's new free speech platform and was denied.

I haven't even tried to appeal it because I just don't have any confidence in that. The only thing we're thinking about was maybe we might try some kind of a new Twitter account just for the David Knight Show. Right now, I'm on Twitter as Libertarian. We put up a David Knight Show Twitter account or something. That maybe we'd be operating under the new rules. I've got a black mark on me. I've been identified by AI as somebody who's a Russian agent, obviously. When you look at that.

I wasn't kidding that stuff. I interviewed. I didn't write any articles for Alexander Dugan. And I interviewed him once. It was alexander dugan and i interviewed him once it was a very interesting interview and i played it once on this show uh after the war started because i thought it really surprised me what his perspective was i was expecting him to be very anti-communist because he was very much about traditional russia and he was very much about the russian orthodox church and recouping all of that and

so i thought he was going to be very critical of lenin and of the communists and he wasn't and it's like how does he hold these two things it's mutually exclusive ideas you know how does he do this double think i thought that was really fascinating, this blindness, this double-think blindness, which we see in people all the time, especially when it comes to politics. No, no, no. Lenin made a lot of mistakes, but he was part of our history and our culture, and I embraced that and all this kind of stuff. I was like, well, okay, whatever. But I interviewed him once. But that's the crowning achievement of what I've done according to artificial intelligence.

Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created Common Past to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.

That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com Well, I want to thank the people. This is last week of June.

People who sent contributions by mail. Christopher S., Matthew H., Jack H., Paul D., Mark C., James F., and Edward C. Thank you very much. Appreciate that. Well, let's talk a little bit about climate. I was going to talk a little bit about follow the money. And of course, there's many ways that we can look at the financial corruption, how these people have bought out Trump and Biden.

Interesting article that I saw on Wine Press. You want to know the difference? You want to know the difference between Biden and Trump? Well, Biden has close ties and is run by BlackRock. Trump has close ties and is run by Blackstone. There you go. The difference between the two of them is the difference between a rock and a stone. A rock and a hard place. That's the difference between Trump and Biden.

And, of course, there's a lot more about Biden that is not being talked about. It's not just the $10 million and all the stuff that they found in Hunter's laptop and, you know, the 10% for the big guy and all the rest of that stuff. Now, John Solomon mentioned it last week. I haven't seen much more about this, but John Solomon is not somebody to make wild allegations to be sensational uh he does thorough work and he says he found another 120 million dollars 120 million dollars in the biden crime family there so i think we're going to hear more about that uh but um and in addition to that just to summarize some of the follow the money stuff uh biden the biden's bought a house and um they got it in the 70s about 185 000 dollars in the 70s and of course you know we're talking about inflation and they sold it in the 90s and um for 1.2 million and i looked at the dates and said well how much of that is inflation

well the 185 000 would have been worth about 500 000 um in the 90s due to inflation and uh devaluing of the currency and uh yet they sold it for two and a half times that raised a lot of eyebrows but even more interesting is the fact that they uh the house that they're in right now they refinanced i believe it was 20 times they refinanced it like why would they do that here they are multi-millionaires and of course you always ask yourself how does somebody like barack obama who never had a job except as community organizer and as a politician we know what the salaries are of the politicians how did he become a multi-multi-millionaire? How did Biden become that? I mean, his wife is a schoolteacher.

He's a politician. He came from a poor family, just like Barack Obama. Now these guys have got tens or hundreds of millions of dollars? Huh. Okay. That's a rhetorical question. How did they get that? But then the weird thing about Biden and refin refinancing his house is why does he refinance

it 20 times and somebody asked chat gpt that and chat gpt said this is a strategy for laundering money you can um you can refinance the house and keep going further and further into debt with it. And if you got some hidden or illegal stream of money, you can pay the mortgage off of that illegal stream of money. And so, you know, more may come to light about that. But it's all it is about the money. Just take a look at how much money is being sent to politicians. And that's all of them. We just had the most expensive congressional race ever. Jamal Bowman versus another Democrat.

And it was $23 million total. I think 14 of it was the guy who beat Jamal Bowman because Bowman had sided with Hamas and the other guy had sided with Israel. And so huge amount of money that flowed in there. That was, seemed to me the key issue there in that district and a $23 million for a congressional race.

You look at Mike Johnson, $80 million in his first full quarter as speaker of the house. And again, going back 24 years, the entire campaign of Al Gore running for President was $70 million. And in one quarter, Mike Johnson gets $80 million. George W. Bush spent $100 million for the entire thing. Al Gore was complaining about that.

Look, he's buying the election. The reason all this money is being spent is because H.L. Mencken said an election is an advanced auction of stolen goods. And that's your goods that they've stolen. They're there in Washington and they're handing that stuff out. And everybody knows that, you know, Washington is not only the Federal Reserve is not only the reserve currency of the world, but it is the criminal horde of where you can go. And you can buy a politician, and you can get several thousand percent return on your investment. And so, of course, people are throwing money at them left and right.

They're throwing money at both sides, left and right. Whoever wins, they win. Whoever wins, they get paid back 2,000, 10,000 percent return on investment by giving the money to these politicians. That's the corruption that is there. That's why you're not going to fix anything in these federal elections. Federal elections are useless. I wouldn't even bother to vote if it wasn't for local elections uh stealth patriot thank you for the tip governor bill lee has signed a bill calling for 30 days of prayer tennessee house joint resolution 1803 asking uh stealth patriot for prayer and fasting what do you think uh i

think that's always a good idea um and this is something that's been done in the past, you know, and we can look at politicians' motivations. Maybe what we could do is we could pray and fast that God will take these toll roads away that Bill Lee wants to put in. But seriously, as Paul said, he said some people preach Christ out of greed and avarice uh some people preach him out of honest uh motivations he says i'm just glad that christ is preached so i'm just glad that people are praying and fasting uh i don't know i there's no way for me to tell what the politicians

motives are i have my suspicions but it could be sincere but i think there'll be a lot of people regardless of the leaders and what they call thing there'll be a lot of people who are sincere in their prayer fasting and i think that'll make a difference you know god deals primarily with us as individuals and we all stand before him as individuals but he also deals with nations and you can see this over and over again in the Bible. You can see how he dealt with the nation of Israel, for example, or you can see how he dealt with Nineveh. He sent Jonah there, and they repented. Or how he deals with Babylon or whatever. You know, he deals with nations collectively as well as with individuals. And so we should pray for the peace of the city that we're in.

You know, we're here as sojourners and travelers. This world is not our home. We're not trying to set up a kingdom of God here on this earth. But at the same time, what God told the Jews who were in captivity, in Babylonian captivity, captivity he said you know build uh build your your farms and build your families and have kids and all the rest of stuff and pray for the peace of uh the country that you're in you know even when you're in captivity we should think about uh this situation that we're in now is a kind of captivity, I think.

It really is. DGA, David, I asked my Trump supporter friends about justice for COVID tyranny, and none of them approve of Trump being held accountable for any of it. They say he was duped, and they blame Fauci. I know, I've heard it over and over again. And who kept Fauci in? Who gave Fauci the podium? Who gave Fauci the podium? Who gave Fauci the medal on his last day in office?

Who was afraid of Fauci and why? And, of course, they'll also blame the mandate. I heard Laura Loomer say, well, these people took it. I knew better. I didn't take it. If you took it, it's on you. It's your problem you know trump had the poison and and i've played that clip i never forget that from that one movie it

really stunned me um the movie is called i i has i won't even say the name of it because i you go back and look at movies that i watched uh 40 years ago and it's like oh um i don't want to recommend I don't remember anything about this movie, except it was this crazy woman. And she's trying to find her way. She's having like some midlife crisis or something like that. So she's, um,

you know, cheating on her husband and doing all this other kind of stuff. But she, she goes into the kitchen and she's got this Basset hound and she pours milk in the bowl and then pours poison in the bowl and says to the basset hound there's poison in that milk i wouldn't drink that if i were you and sits there and watches the dog dog sniffs it walks away now to me that's what laura loomer is doing well you know there's poison in that vaccine if i were you i wouldn't take it but

hey if you're gonna take it it's on you it If I were you, I wouldn't take it. But hey, if you're going to take it, it's on you. It's your fault, right? Why would you take it? Would it be because people putting pressure on you? You can't work. You can't travel. You can't go to school. Can't do this.

Can't do that. If you don't take it, you're going to be a second class citizen. You're going to be locked down forever. Maybe they think you had all these people hectoring everyone trump saying it's great it's wonderful take it and these people will take the poison and look at what's happened to so many of them i think that is one of the most reprehensible things i've ever heard that kind of callous disregard for people tells you everything you need to know about these political whores like laura loomer and the rest of them grit Tim Pool grifting off of

Trump disgusts me it disgusts me I worked with people like that I know exactly what they're about I want to have nothing to do with anybody like that nothing to do with any of them Jim Z7 Obama has three mansions one of them right on me doesn't seem to be a great thing for the climate and one of them is in an area that they all say is going to be flooded it's just he doesn't believe it he doesn't believe it oh and he's not the only one that does that but you can go to a website and they'll tell you yeah the seas are going to rise and here's the places look at how the coastline is going to be flooded and these people meanwhile are spending exorbitant sums of money to build their mansions where if they believed any of this climate stuff they'd be

underwater well let's take a look at the damage that's being done to the environment by these people who are so keen on saving the environment thousands of joshua trees are set to fall victim to the green energy transition in california now the joshua trees are very rare very special i mean i i they're hardly classified as trees in my opinion when you look at them they don't provide any shade uh but uh in the hot desert but you know hey it's a unique thing and they want to preserve it because of its uniqueness. I get that. But even as they have passed laws in California, it's there and protected under the Endangered Species Act. And yet to build a solar farm, they're going to cut down 3,500 of them.

And then put up solar panels. How could that happen in California where it's protected? Well, they approved the project before they decided that they would protect the trees. And does that make any sense? I mean, we've seen dams that have been held up and everything because they came in and protected the snail darter or whatever. I don't buy that excuse for a moment this is what they're going to do or the trees are estimated to be between 100 and 200 years old government approval of the solar project in 2021 predated a state decision to protect the joshua tree under the california

endangered species act and last year they had an enactment by the legislature of the joshua tree conservation act so they've had two different laws one of them specific to this very tree it bar it bans unpermitted killing of the trees so these trees are protected supposedly by laws and yet ah we just can't do anything about it we got this solar project that's going up you know when we were competing against blockbuster they came in to a town where we were working and they had very restrictive signage things they had restrictions about building codes on it and lo and behold they came in and they spent more than anybody had ever spent for a tract of land to do an out parcel uh building and they violated every one of these building codes

and the local paper talked about it in cary north carolina and the response by the city was well um we made a mistake uh yeah it is a violation of all the building code here but we had somebody in the planning department approved it now and we can't do anything about it it's like oh really how much money did they pay you come on give me a break you know and that's what we're looking here. You really think they can't or won't protect the Joshua Tree? How much money are they paying Newsom or these other people to get their project in? The developer is at pains to justify the solar project, citing his role in man-made climate change. He's all about the environment. Adventus is working to preserve native Mojave plants like the Joshua tree,

while also preserving California's ability to achieve its clean energy goals. So they're going to cut down 3,500 of them. 3,500. Now, it's not just the Joshua tree, but it's other things that people get all upset about. The desert tortoises. That was a big deal at the Bundy Ranch. Or you have eagles. Eagles, right?

Oh, don't you? You know, you get an eagle feather. Boy, that's big crime, big felony. Oh, well, not for the people who are making the wind power, right? So the solar panel can kill the desert tortoises. They can chop down the Joshua trees, and they can put up these taxpayer-subsidized wind turbines, and they don't really care how many bald and golden eagles they kill.

There is a Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, just like there is a Joshua Tree Protection Act. This one is federal. But in February, the Interior Department's Fish and Wildlife Service updated its rule for the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act under the category of incidental taking. That's like an accidental killing. Okay. Permits for certain activities under prescribed conditions, including qualifying wind energy projects, activities that may disturb breeding bald eagles

and bald eagle nest. Well, okay, if your wind farm is going to chop up bald eagles, if it's going to create weird pressure things and stop them from being able to breed,

that's fine. That's fine. By issuing permits for the incidental take of a bird, they acknowledge that some of the eagles will be slaughtered by the wind turbines. But that's fine. It's to be expected.

And, you know, we need to have a clean environment. You know, I mean, just look at how clean everything was under Trump, as I pointed out before, as he said. We had H2O. Well, you know, H2O, you're going to need a lot of h2o if you're gonna mine lithium lithium has a dirty little secret here even though that's the key ingredient in these batteries that the entire world is going to have to run off of lithium batteries when you mine this it takes an unbelievable amount of water and typically you find lithium in places where there isn't any water.

Ironically, lithium extraction is associated with sharply negative environmental externalities as it is with clean and green energy initiatives. An electrified economy by 2030, because again, that remains their goal, and they're saying we've got to speed things up to get there in 2030. An electrified economy in 2030 will likely need anywhere from 250,000 to 450,000 tons of lithium. By comparison, in 2021, the world produced only 105 tons. So we're going to need to have about maybe you know four thousand times more lithium than we currently have and we got to ramp that up in six years so I'm

gonna need to cut some corners here when we mind this stuff we need to cut some corners when we do the heap leaching and all the rest of the stuff we might wind up a fires everywhere but of course that'll be the co2 fault won't be the lithium batteries fault when that happens. Lithium extraction is typically extremely water-intensive, and it's often found in extremely water-stressed areas, such as South America's so-called lithium triangle. The chemicals involved in lithium extraction are extremely toxic.

The release of such chemicals through leaching spills or airs emissions that can harm communities, ecosystems, and food production. Finally, the lithium industry presents key geopolitical issues in its current form. While most lithium is extracted in Australia and South America, almost all lithium processing takes place in China, creating a politically dangerous concentration of vital supply chain. So we're going to put everybody on lithium batteries. But all the lithium batteries are coming from China. Now, one of the things that they don't point out in this Zero H article is why if we are extracting the lithium in australia and

south america primarily why is it going to china to be manufactured well of course it would be because it's cheaper in china why is it cheaper in china to manufacture because of the Paris Climate Accord. Because of the Paris Climate Accord, they can have as many power plants, and they're building them up really rapidly, as many power plants, as many coal power plants, cheap coal power plants that don't have any scrubbing, any cleaning at all on their emissions. They can build as many of those as they wish and nothing done to clean or filter the output of that guess what that means that their power rates are a tiny fraction of where they are everywhere else in the world you see this globalist agreement the paris climate

accord which was self-ratified by kerry and obama and Biden, and which Trump went along with and said, well, they ratified, there's nothing I can do about it, and got out of it for two months after Biden was elected, and Biden immediately got back into it. So he didn't do anything to get out of it. That agreement there is set up by the globalists to transfer wealth and manufacturing to china it's not about global warming because if it's about global warming then you don't want to have the offending

power plants anywhere right that's what a lot of the environmentalists said they said that's crazy why would we give india and china a free pass on this if we're going to shut it down everywhere else if global warming is an issue if co2 is an issue, it's an issue everywhere. They shouldn't be given a pass. They don't believe any of this stuff. This is simply an excuse. It's simply a MacGuffin for them to get rich, for them to starve us, for them to kill us. Scientists want to pour 60,000 gallons of sodium hydroxide into the ocean off cape cod

to test carbon dioxide removal that's lie they want to put 60 000 gallons of lie into the ocean and the epa wants that let's talk about clean water let's talk about clean water when you got people like the epa and others pushing in fluoride and of course one of the things that they're worried about is uh our enemies they say might use cyber security attacks to mess with our water supply well i mean what are they going to do dump fluoride into it they they going to dump lye into our ocean or something? We're already doing that. We're already doing that.

So one critic said it'd do nothing to solve the root causes of the climate crisis. Instead, it puts at risk the ocean's natural capacity to absorb carbon. And the reason that they're doing this, and listen to the name of the project, they call it Locked Nest by the Woods Hole. Woods Hole is an oceanographic institution but they call their project lockness um and uh so they're doing this as kind of a proof of concept these people are opposing it not because 60 000 gallons of anything in the ocean is really a drop in the bucket. I mean, it'd kill the fish in the immediate area and that type of thing.

But it's really a drop in the bucket of the Atlantic Ocean. However, this is an experiment for them to do geoengineering on a large scale. And so they're going to put fluorescent dye into this stuff and the lye, and they're hoping that the lye will help them to absorb CO2, the gas that they gaslight us with. And everything is about that. We've got to stop CO2 everywhere. Well, you know, 60,000 gallons of poisonous lye is not a big deal to dump in the ocean, 0.04% of CO2 is not a really big deal to have that in the atmosphere.

And only 3% of that comes from humans. All of this is nonsense. And yet, the politicians, Trump included, will all play along with this. Researchers, they said, have no direct way of measuring how much carbon dioxide will be removed by the experiment. Measurements, data, do we do that anymore? We don't do that anymore. No, no, no. We are scientists, which means that they are bureaucrats who are looking for grants.

They're not scientists. They're not doing science. They're not not scientists. They're not doing science. They're not doing data. They're not doing measurements. We don't do any of that stuff anymore. The production of alkaline materials is extremely energy intensive, releasing similar or even higher levels of greenhouse gases than they remove upon being dumped into the ocean, said the group. Oh, well, they're doing a little bit of thinking anyway.

It's kind of like that thing. Well, if we're going to let China and India have as many power plants as they want, the two most populous countries on earth, how is this helping anything if you're talking about it being man-made? And these people are saying, well, to create this lie, that's very energy intensive. And so you're going to be doing things that are going to increase the co2 at the same time you're dumping it's almost like the manufacturing

process for the electric cars or something you know what is your uh how much energy and how many emissions have you put into um into the manufacturing of this car well even more than you have with a normal internal combustion engine so they said this is a dangerous distraction from the real solutions for the climate crisis what's the real solution for the climate crisis i point out that the emperors have no clothes the scientists have no data they won't show you the data they're trying to hide the decline all the rest of the stuff this has been known for a very long time, going back to ClimateGate, which quote-unquote scientists around the world agree requires a rapid reduction

in planet-heating fossil fuel emissions. Now, these quote-unquote scientists, and I'm going to say any scientists who want to push this stuff, they deserve air quotes around their title of scientist they want to zero everything out especially people especially people uh octo spook money allows you to break all environmental laws and all the other laws as well as uh we have certainly seen enough to know that dougalug says i once knew an old black man that had kind of had a gotten lie in his eye kind of spooky looking all white eye yeah it was a very very corrosive very very dangerous yeah people would use that to make soap uh you got to be very careful with that uh the dod the department of defense is turning plastic waste into food this is a darpa project

so you thought it was bad when they told you to eat the bugs well now they're going to tell you to eat the plastic darpa the defense advanced research projects agency who are they at war with that they need to have plastic food well you and i right the pentagon is at war with us and darpa has like granted millions of dollars to researchers to turn military plastic waste into a bacterial protein powder that can be fed to humans yeah here we are soylent green uh and of course you know everything else that they get this just the latest thing besides the gmo on the and the bugs the gmo salmon and all the rest of this stuff it never ends with these people and i pointed out last week they have a um uh annika biosciences

it's almost like Anakin Skywalker. They have genetically engineered bacterial spores to put in something to identify produce specifically by DNA analysis. You can't wash it off. You can't boil it or fry it or microwave it or steam it. And even your digestion doesn't get rid of this so then they can look in the sewers to see what you're eating because they are so obsessed about everything just like the usda now wanting to tag and track all the dairy cattle can't take them across state lines unless they got a tag and a track and all the rest of the stuff well they want to tag and track what you eat and they will look in the sewers to determine what you're eating

these people are obsessive beyond imagination and i'll just end this section here with a new york city mayor eric adams shortly after became mayor i think it was about two years ago new york is part of the c40s initiative no meat no dairy no travel except for you know no private cars no plane flights except one under 900 miles every three years three items of clothing per year that agenda and so eric adams and sees a coming mayor he said all food is not created equal we now have to talk about beef and i don't know if people are ready for this conversation well we're not we're not we're not going to let you steal our beef end of story you're not going to starve us you're not going to kill us we understand we see what you are doing and we're going to stop it at the local

level here's the way there's one of them uh end state involvement and federal climate change scheme this is from the john birch society jbs.org they can help you uh with links to what is happening in your state regarding agenda 2030 and how the epa is bribing states to do what they want for climate change. They've got a chest of $5 billion a bribe to bribe the states and the local governments and tribes and territories to buy into this UN agenda. And only five states so far have not agreed to take the money and do what they want for the UN 2030 agenda, climate. Those five states who have

declined to participate are Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Wyoming. If your state is not one of those, Tennessee is not one of those, that means that they're being bribed by the EPA. This is how politics works, folks. In every issue, it works this way. If they don't have constitutional authority,

rather than trying to fight this in the courts or fight other, they just give you money. Yeah, I'll give you this. It's just outright corruption so again uh jbs john birch society says rather than blindly going along with unconstitutional federal program that threatens state sovereignty and american values state governments must withdraw from the cprg program and all other federal programs. Furthermore, they must take solid action to protect property rights and prevent implementation of Agenda 2030.

And so they have information at jbs.org to help you to find those bills, how to contact your state legislators, and now is a good time to do it because we've got elections coming up in most of the states. Radis Bro, thank you very much for the tip uh news are for grooming the stool in the u.s government that's right they're gonna be grooming everybody's stool uh remember how they got all they had to do that for george w bush when he was traveling oh you know get his poop we can't let the those riskies analyze his poop they'll know something about him be able to figure out something about his health or

something like that it's like oh i don't i don't think he had any health issues i mean he's still kicking around uh but you know that that's how obsessive they are about everything and they want to know um they project this stuff on other people because they want to go around and analyze everybody's feces. They think that our enemies want to do the same thing to us. Maybe they don't. Johnny 17, I think they want Trump again to install CBDC. The second term of every president is always far, worse far more statist and yes it'll put the people who would oppose you go down the list of all the things that are part of the globalist

checklist because look this next term goes from 2025 to 2029 they want to have their new society in place by 2030 so it's going to be in this next term they're really going to put a push on and when you look at whether it's the pandemic mcguffin or the climate mcguffin or So it's going to be in this next term. They're really going to put a push on. And when you look at whether it's the pandemic MacGuffin or the climate MacGuffin or whether it's a global digital ID, Trump can shut down the opposition to it just by his mere presence. That's the way it works with those people. Idiots, idiots, absolute idiots. CBDC is coming no matter who. The petrodollar is toast, says Opossum King. Well, I agree. By the way, let me tell everybody about DavidKnight.Gold.

I'll take you to Tony Ardaban. And to me, you look at how we have been preloaded by both of these presidents for excessive spending, quantitative easing. There is an inflation bomb that is going to hit. But even more important than that is the CBDC stuff. I want to get out of their monitoring system. That's what is so important about gold and silver. To have something like that as a medium of exchange

that is intrinsic wealth, that is completely hidden from them they've just put in all new reporting rules for uh the different crypto exchanges and all the rest of the stuff crypto is so public in terms of all the stuff that you're spending and so i want something that's going to be completely private that's why why I favor gold and silver. But if you want to do that, Tony Arterburn is a great guy to deal with. I've dealt with him for years. I've known him for years. Wise Wolf Gold, you can be part of the Wolf Pack. You can join a purchasing group, get a quantity discount by being in it,

and you can get in for as little as $50. You can go down to the $35 level. Uh, that's for kids, but you know, you could do that, I guess. Um, but you know, from $50 and I don't know what the highest amount is, but he goes up pretty high. It's just, uh, setting aside, uh, each month, uh, purchasing of gold and silver in preparation. And so you can do that. You can buy large or small amounts of gold or silver, and he can help you with a metals IRA. And you can get to Tony at Wise Wolf Gold by going through DavidKnight.Gold, and that'll let him know that you're coming through me.

We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Thank you. Succes! Making sense common again. You're listening to the david knight show well we've had some interesting update on friday in terms of supreme court decision that affects january the six prisoners and of course some of the charges against trump isn't that interesting that we got people that um you, you know, he, he's raised how many millions of dollars? I have no idea off of his mugshot talked about how he was tortured as he got that mugshot, that a little bit of time that he was posing for his picture. And yet we've had people who have been in jail now for years. Some of them still awaiting trial. Some of them picked up this year and some of them sentenced to decades in prison well uh there was a case about this and of course um amy coney barrett on the wrong side of the

first amendment again she wrote the dissenting opinion and um brown jackson joined with um uh the the people that you would expect to vote conservatively and um she went with a squad so it was six to three and uh brown jackson who would usually vote with the liberal obama appointees uh went with the uh five uh nominal conservatives i guess we could say and uh amy coney barrett went with sonia sotomayor and alina kagan and i played that clip of barrett when she had the confirmation hearing she was asked by republican senator ben sass about the first amendment can you enumerate the different aspects of it she couldn't and they ask her can you uh tell me why would there be this stuff in there about fricter size religion and free speech and protests why would they put all that stuff together i really don't have any idea she said and now she's proven over and over again

in her wrong opinions that she has written in many cases Whether it's about social media censorship now about this that she neither knows nor cares To know what the First Amendment is about She has no idea You see all this January the 6th stuff this particular charge the disruption of a official proceeding uh that is that is a charge they're bringing against people that didn't do any violence and that is a protest you are allowed

under the first amendment to do a peaceful protest now Now, in her opinion, she said, well, it was an official proceeding and they did disrupt it. So I guess it's an open and shut case. No, not unless your mind is closed to the first amendment. It's not open and shut. Reasons. Jacob Sullivan says the Supreme court's decision centered around Joseph Fisher,

a former Pennsylvania police officer who was charged with several offenses relating to the January 6th Capitol riot. And they said that he forcibly assaulted a federal officer, entered and remained in a restricted building, engaged in disorderly and disruptive conduct in the Capitol. However, they tacked on another charge, using the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which criminalizes altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing a record, document, or other object, or attempting to do so with the intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding. So it wasn't that they were disrupting

the official proceeding if amy coney barrett again this is trump's pick one of the worst if not the worst pick for the supreme court i've seen in my lifetime this woman when she came on she immediately attacked the free exercise religion as Trump had locked people down, paid states to lock and governors to lock people down. She went along with that. She's been wrong on every aspect, pretty much now, of the First Amendment. Whether it's free press, free speech of the people, whether it is free exercise religion, whether's the right to uh peacefully assemble and also

the right to redress your grievances on all of these things she has been on the wrong side one of if not the worst pick in my lifetime from a republican i mean the democrats they always get that but you know we need somebody that's supposedly a conservative. Well, anyway, obviously, there were no documents that were destroyed. This guy was not doing any of that stuff. And so this obstruction of an official proceeding was not saying, we wanted to have this meeting, but you're getting in our way and you're disrupting the meeting. No, it was that you're altering or modifying or stealing or destroying documents. And that's what they applied to these people. That's how they're stretching this stuff.

So he challenged that charge. He argued that the statute as written requires the alleged obstruction in question be tied to the impairment of records, documents, or objects. Justice Jackson, Brown Jackson, sided with Fisher.

And as Reason says, this shouldn't, in theory, come as a surprise. She is the only former public defender on the current court. In the judiciary broadly, you're far more likely to find former prosecutors as judges. So it stands to reason that she understands firsthand the downsides of the government getting creative with criminal statutes as prosecutors are prone to do well hopefully she will be on that side and we'll see what happens certainly barrett is not and uh you know we look at somebody we looked at the the charges against uh this particular guy who took the supreme court case uh if we look at Joe Biggs, for example,

who I know and worked with, the charges against him, again, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of official proceeding. So those two should go away. Problem is that they put a bunch of other stuff in there too. A conspiracy to use force, seditious conspiracy. You see all this stuff interference

with law enforcement during civil disorder i never saw any pictures of joe biggs doing any violence all the pictures i saw of him he's walking through the place with a smile on his face just like sim who worked as a cameraman at info wars and they came after him he's walking around with a camera doing reporting work walking between the velvet ropes who worked as a cameraman at Infowars, and they came after him. He's walking around with a camera doing reporting work, walking between the velvet ropes. And when you look at the big charge of seditious conspiracy, these people should have all been pardoned by Donald Trump.

They all went to follow Trump. They all went to support Trump. What did he do? He threw them under the bus. He let them be thrown into the jail to rot for life. That's his gratitude. He demands absolute, unwavering loyalty from everybody, and he shows no loyalty to anyone. Anyone.

Not his subordinates, not his supporters, not his wives. To no one. No one. And so when you look at this, he could have, should have, pardon them. If you look at the charge of seditious conspiracy, that goes back to the Civil War. That was put in there by some legislators who wanted to get vengeance against the confederate soldiers that had surrendered andrew jackson as president who had replaced lincoln after lincoln was assassinated did not want that to happen and so what he did was he gave a pardon to all of the confederate soldiers ending it now trump could have done the same thing couldn't he yeah we also they

weren't charged yet with anything we also saw g Gerald Ford more recently do that with Richard Nixon. He pardoned Richard Nixon for any and all crimes that he might be charged with later on. Trump did nothing. Nothing. Nothing for his people. He ripped them off, stole $250 million from his supporters, gave them false hope, sent them to January the 6th. He and Alex Jones and the rest of those people who grifted off of them, who abandoned them, who ran to the other side of town when it all happened. Not me, not me.

It's them alone. I just cannot. So much disgust for those people. Psalm 144. Thank you for those people. Psalm 144. Thank you for the tip. Thank you very much. Hey, David, I almost forgot. I saw a short TikTok story.

Do I remember the guy's name? About cobalt mining in Idaho. Didn't know if he knew anything about it or not. It seemed very disturbing. No, I don't. But that is a very, very dirty business. And the way they do it, using children in the so-called Democratic Republic of the Congo, it's just horrific what they do to those kids.

And, of course, cobalt is another thing that is necessary, like lithium. Big problems, big problems with the supply chain on this ev stuff it ain't gonna work it isn't going to work it's just there to create chaos and disruption and do it iteratively as now she said uh it's not a solution it is a disruption lt oracle of truth scotus just sent trump immunity case back down to the lower court oh well it just came with a hot potato we don't want to deal with this thing i knew they weren't going to do anything before the debate i knew i've kind of figured that they were going to drop it on friday so they dropped it today on monday uh it would have been a little bit smarter for them just let go of it on friday

because you know friday is a slow news day a lot of people don't pay any attention to it do it on a friday or saturday especially when everybody's talking about the debate and joe biden so they is a slow news day. A lot of people don't pay any attention to it. Do it on a Friday or a Saturday, especially when everybody's talking about the debate and Joe Biden. So they threw that hot potato back down. DGA, David, thank God we put all of our hope and trust in Jesus Christ. Yes.

I couldn't imagine putting all their faith in this corrupt political system globally. I know. It's the craziest thing. And yet, as we see, today is a day that Steve Bannon is going to go to prison. And he is defiant about this. One of Donald Trump's favorite Goldman Sachs bankers, as a matter of fact. Just remember, that's where he comes from.

Goldman Sachs. And as usual, it's the hubris, the ignorance, the bombastic blustering of this grifter that really stands out. And that's what he's doing. I want to play this little clip. I think this is NBC. And they had an interview with him. And listen how this guy is trying to push for a civil war. He's trying to push a civil war. He's trying to push this after the January 6th thing. He's still at it. Just before he reports to federal prison, one-time top strategist for former President Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, remains defiant. We only get stronger with this.

We're not going to get weaker. We're a populist movement. After leaving his position as chief White House strategist less than seven months into the Trump administration, Bannon went back to his roots in conservative media. It's Saturday, 29 June, the year of our Lord, 2024. That sounds familiar. An online program he calls War Room, which has rocketed in popularity among the MAGA faithful. He's went ahead and ignited a bunch of fires under a lot of people, including myself. Mr. Bannon refused to testify.

But his refusal to comply with the congressional investigation of the January 6th Capitol attack and alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election led to Bannon's conviction by a jury on two counts of contempt of Congress. The Supreme Court now refusing to delay Bannon's conviction by a jury on two counts of contempt of Congress. The Supreme Court now refusing to delay Bannon's four-month sentence as he appeals. Why refuse to comply with the congressional subpoena? Because first off, my lawyer told me when I got the letter of exerting executive privilege from the president, the J6 committee was not legitimately structured. So therefore, their subpoenas don't mean anything.

No court has so far agreed with those objections. The January 6th committee's interest in Bannon stemming in part from White House records showing he talked to President Trump twice on January 6th, as well as the day before. The same day Bannon said this. All hell is going to break loose tomorrow. All I can say is strap in. There were personal and private conversations that he's exerted executive privilege on. Bannon, who speaks regularly around the country,

are you prepared to leave it all on the battlefield? Says even in prison, his message won't be silenced what is your end game victory or death of this republic if we don't win the first of the shred the constitution it is the death of the constitutional american republic we know well first of all bannon they shredded the constitution you didn't do anything when you were there in the white house as part of his uh i guess that was your executive privilege that you didn't have to do anything about that. How dare you try to turn America into a battlefield for your own personal aggrandizement? And that's what's going on with this stuff, folks. This guy is an idiot.

All he had to do was show up and plead the fifth. You want somebody like this as your general in a civil war? He doesn't know anything. He doesn't know anything. He doesn't know anything. He's a fool. He is an arrogant, ignorant fool, full of hubris, full of himself. He is a Goldman Sachs banker. I would never trust him.

His big money bags guy behind him is a former Chinese communist official that became a billionaire. And then because of internal politics, he's now a fugitive and a criminal. It's just amazing. This guy, Bannon, Goldman Sachs banker, he's been convicted of one crime after the other. His conviction with that We Build the Wall thing was nothing compared to the grift that he was involved with january the 6th they want to talk to him because he got some phone calls from trump he said two weeks before this thing happened a recording of him talking again to a group of chinese people associated with guo and telling them it doesn't matter what happens

whatever happens if we win or lose we're going to say this is all corrupt he is an agent of chaos just like fauci is and uh you understand the the fact that uh hunter biden can blow off a subpoena from congress and he can hold a press conference in front of the building there where they're meeting, where they want him to testify. And instead of going to it, he holds a press conference, and I'm not going in there. And that's the same thing that Bannon did. And of course, you know that Hunter is not going to have anything done to him, but Bannon will. Now, here's another thing.

Does Bannon not know that i know that you know that how could he not know that right how could he be that stupid how could he be that full of hubris to know that there's a different standard it's going to be applied to him and um you know that's the only thing we can say in his favor the rest of the stuff is stupid the rest of the stuff is he was scheming and plotting and bragging in public as you heard there and in private as we saw with a released tapes bragging that they were going to throw the election into disarray whatever happened before it happened he was bragging that and now he is saying now we're going to have this is the

hill to die on we're going to have to, it's liberty or death. We're all going to show up and fight. This is the kind of nonsense that he and Alex and Roger Stone and Trump were putting out there before January the 6th. I told everybody, you are a fool if you follow these criminals. And they are. They're criminals. They're grifting criminals. Stay away from them.

The Progress Retort. Thank you for the tip. Writes, discovered regional planners, also known as MPOs nationwide, have access to $450 billion in climate action funding. Look up your nearest big city's climate action plan. I met Thomas Masseysey and may he said that's the fight he knows he knows so sorry to see what happened with his wife that was released during this program on friday uh no word as to what caused her death but that's not the issue the issue is such a great loss to him.

I didn't realize that they had been high school sweethearts, that they had both gone to MIT and graduated and started a tech business, sold it, became multimillionaire. He's got, I did see some of the video that he put out talking about how he's completely off the grid he's got like a old tesla battery from a tesla car that he uses solar power and things like that and uh and he's farming so but he certainly does understand what is happening texas coast south bannon is pushing for civil war but he won't go out there and fire a shot. You better believe he won't.

He's going to be one of these guys that runs to the other side of the country when it all happens. He's just there as an instigator. And I have nothing but contempt for these people. Jack Posobiet is another one. Another one of these guys. Stay away from these people. Michael Flynn. These people are intelligence agents

they've been a part of the intel community uh they're grifting you they're tricking you it's it's always coming from those guys always always how many times they're going to run this thing that you know it's just like um they just keep running the same play at the same idiots because they can't see it coming. They can't stop it. They won't stop it. It's just like putting on the line, you've got some guy who weighs 120 pounds. They're going to run the ball at him every day.

That's what the MAGA people are. They're lightweight targets targets and they're going to run the ball at those guys every single day and they got people like bannon carrying that ball and they're going to fall for it i'm marty says bannon can do a four months standing on his head he like trump is playing the martyr card yeah that's a big thing yeah well he's he's so excited about it his four months stint will be another platform yeah i paid the price i went to jail you people out there you listen to me because i you know i worked on my convictions and it's like yeah well this is the only conviction he apparently has

it's like trump you know it's two different types of convictions you can have the kind to get in court the kind you get out of the Bible, but they got the court kind. And then the Chevron issue here. And somebody made a comment earlier saying they thought this might come back and backfire. And, of course, the Chevron thing actually has backfired from the very beginning. Chevron deference actually comes from the oil company called Chevron. But in a sense, it has, I think, kind of a double meaning because they use this as a way for the bureaucracies. That's a flag, a Chevron that they would do their dirty work under and gave them an excuse. excuse and it began with epa under reagan uh getting around some um interpreting some regulations and doing it in a permissive way but since then you've had all these different

government bureaucracies say well you know we will uh we will go ahead and do um we'll make up these role rules for this. It's what Nancy Pelosi was talking about when she said, we got to pass Obamacare so we can find out what's in it. The regulators and the bureaucracy is really going to fill in the devilish details. She wasn't going to do it.

She's just going to give, that bill was just to give them all kinds of powers. And so that's what this address, we'll get to in a second here. Tornator, thank you for the tip uh i'd hate to spoil your plans i went to see horizon over the weekend it was incoherent disjointed mess oh that's that's good to know um okay there was little to no character development

it was essentially just three hours of indian on settler and vice versa violence with little to no context if you want to see a highly entertaining action comedy i highly recommend the fall guy not sure if you're still playing near you we actually did go to see that that's about the only movie we saw in the last uh four or five years maybe you know no last year that's right we went to there's one other that we went to see and um and then when karen's brother was here uh it was available online and she said um oh let's watch that i enjoyed that we saw it in the movie theaters she watched it she said you know really wasn't all that good uh when i saw the second time but uh it was it was funny and um it had some good special effects and it was good popcorn entertainment well thank you i'll take that into consideration maybe we'll change our plans um it's an awful lot of money to drop

on something unless you're pretty sure that it's going to be good so i thought they were just coming after kevin costner i saw a review where this person came after him and said last of the corn ball directors and they started talking about what they didn't like and i thought well um i like all those things you know i like traditional stuff i like uh the sentimentalism the romance romanticism the traditionalism all these things that these people call cornball i thought you know maybe i'll go see that because it seems to me like what has happened it came out of hollywood and now these values that kind of disperse throughout our society the idea that it's somehow cool to be cynical the idea that we want to we don't want to have good guys and bad guys we want even the good guys to have a lot of bad in them that's much more

interesting isn't it you know and i i really don't like that i like the straight up i like the straight up good guy bad guy stuff uh i i like to have somebody to root for and i like to hold up the uh ideals of what is right so i that's one of the reasons that's it was actually that review they said well that's it i'm gonna go see it but maybe i won't um and so um yeah i read that comment there so the chevron difference it empowered agencies to interpret ambiguous laws as it states that courts should defer to an agency's interpretation of a law as long as that interpretation is reasonable and it goes back to 1984 ruling natural resources council came after chevron uh represented victory for theron. It represented a victory for the Reagan administration and a loss for the environmental groups. Now it's gone the other direction.

Under Reagan, the EPA issued a rule that allowed manufacturing plants to install or modify one piece of equipment without obtaining a federal permit. Environmental groups challenged the rule saying that it violated the Clean air act and would cause more air pollution but the 1984 unanimous supreme court decision said that the court should defer to the epa's reading of the clean air act and other agencies interpretations of other statutes you know it's kind of interesting here we are 40 years later and we didn't all die because the epa let that one piece of equipment go through all right shiva adure has uh ready to come on so we're gonna take a quick break and we're gonna establish uh contact with him uh should be very interesting we're gonna talk about uh

what didn't happen in the debate what needs to happen where we need to focus on fixing the problems in this country because everybody knows we got lots of problems the only question is what do we do to fix them so uh she was going to be our guest we'll be right back © BF-WATCH TV 2021 ¶¶ Defending the American Dream. You're listening to The David Knight Show. All right, folks, joining us now is Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai. Glad to have him on. He's running for president. Shiva for president.com. Now, he live streamed the debate on Twitter, like a lot of other people did, and gave his comments in real time.

So we won't talk to him about the debate. But as I was talking to him off air, he's very interested in talking about the Supreme Court cases and First Amendment infringements that came from those. And I am, too. I've talked about them some on Friday. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Shiva. Good to be here, David. How are you? Doing good.

Doing good. thank you for joining us dr shiva yeah good to be here david how are you doing good doing good david what i wanted to do was um as many people know i was heavily involved probably the center piece of the entire discovery of the fact that the government of the united states in fact all governments of the world have a backdoor censorship portal into every social media company yes in my 2020 case David you may remember I uncovered um in courtroom testimony the fact that the government of Massachusetts had coerced Twitter or Twitter would never have thrown me off had it not been for um the government of Massachusetts because I exposed the fact that the government of massachusetts had destroyed ballot images which is a violation of the federal law when i went to do my own audit of how possibly i could have lost my election to a guy who had no lawn signs nothing

in massachusetts and everyone can go to winbackfreedom.com i don't want to go through that i've talked about that extensively but it was my work my representing myself in court which exposed the fact bear view to half a billion people all over the world that the government of the united states starting in 20 well it was trump who created saisa uh unanimously approved by both wings of congress both wings of Congress 99 are funded by APAC right both wings of Congress supported the execution of a law which allowed the creation of infrastructure for government to coerce social media companies to do their bidding or more probably better to have a collusion between social media companies and government as one entity what some people call state imperialism you know so that's what i uncovered and most important was my case showed conclusively with evidence that the government coercing twitter to do that period

and that's why i won my federal injunction in court now except you david and a few other people who covered that case none of the mainstream media grifters, including Glenn Greenwald, who I consider a grifter, and we can talk about it, or I call him Effort Carlson, right? I'll be kind on your show, right? None of these, they actually concealed it for two years. And they spoke about it in the so-called twitter files acting like they had discovered this but the reality was they concealed it during the most important time when it needed to be brought out that's what these guys always do it's called the limited cia hangout all right anyway after i exposed all this david interesting enough they found two other brown guys people look

like me indian guys one of them is a guy called jay bhattacharya who had promoted lockdowns in a scientific paper in 2020 all right out of stanford you know my stuff was going viral and this is what happens when an independent agent like me brings out the truth or you david what they do is it's a very insidious technique they don't want to give limelight to the independent people bring out the truth so what they do is it's a very insidious technique they don't want to give limelight to the independent people bring out the truth so what they do is they hide that truth and then they put one of their controlled opposition people to quote unquote hijack that finding and own it and that's what happened so these guys in Missouri versusiden file a lawsuit and i was very very upset with jim hoff because

jim covered our cases from the gateway pundit never told me they were doing any of this that's true yeah i thought that he was at one of the defendants or plaintiffs exactly exactly and jim covered our case extensively now when i read the case because i read cases i said this is this case is going to fail it's set up to fail because they couldn't show directly at the government you know at their bidding social media companies did it now why is this important because social media companies have their first amendment right government also has first amendment right okay from the constitution the issue is did Twitter do what the government wanted because Twitter was Twitter would not have done it if the government didn't call them you say it's

very important thing yeah I have First Amendment rights you uh government has First Amendment rights and so does a company like Twitter so it's a very important thing to show that if there is government forcing Twitter to do this, it's called state action by a very important ruling that you have to argue called Blum versus Uretsky, which I argued successfully in federal court in Massachusetts. That's why I got my injunction. I won that. It's the centerpiece of the case. Now, after I won it and went on to the major trial, the judge was trying to bribe me to drop all the claims against the government and they appointed me a lawyer who was colluding also with the judge and the government from all perspective okay and i

wouldn't exceed and then they tried to come after me and that's why i actually filed a new case in december 2023 against the u.s government not just massachusetts so that case is live okay but everyone needs to understand that i am the one who has the actual evidence david that can stand courtroom testimony which is i have the case of the century which shows we have the courtroom testimony from the government social media director of the government of massachusetts telling a federal judge yes i contacted twitter we didn't like his tweets and when they took it down we were relieved quote unquote it doesn't get any better than that these clowns who filed missouri versus biden was flawed and it's funny they found two indian guys who knew about our case. And you would think if they wanted to strengthen it, they would have referred to our case. So why didn't they refer to it?

So they set up a case where they filed it in Republican-centric federal courts, so they'd win those in the Fifth Circuit. But when it went up to the Supreme Court, Amy Coney barrett destroyed it because she said you don't have exact evidence of the government actually coercing social media because they because in the cases that they had the social media companies already had these people on their red flag list right but my case they didn't i was never thrown off social media you say yeah so my case was of course so why didn't they include my case when it was so well known all over the world and we've seen this type of thing from the supreme court in the past i've talked many times about as they were putting in the national firearms act and other things like that and back in the 1930s they had a guy to establish uh that that act they had a guy who was a convicted

criminal had previous convictions miller and he had a sawed-off shotgun and so they bring this action against him and that was the case that they wanted to bring in they argued that he couldn't have a sawed-off shotgun because it was not a military weapon and he even died before the case was heard at the supreme court they went ahead with it anyway even though the guy was dead it wasn't a moot case you know when you look at something like this and and barrett says these people don't have standing it's like who had standing to decide a case of a guy that's already died but they when they want to establish a precedent they'll do anything uh no matter how ridiculous it is you know and then

what i'm saying here david is why didn't these lawyers why didn't these people who knew about my case reach out yeah why did they even reference it they intentionally concealed our case in massachusetts knowing it was the landmark case here in massachusetts why would you conceal it david that's the question and the only conclusion coming either they're really really dumb and incompetent or was done intentionally that's the that's the only two conclusions either you're dumb and you're an incompetent lawyer on the most important case that knowing the history that i had revealed that by by the way, it was Trump who signed into law, which created that backdoor infrastructure, supported by both wings of Congress.

You have this landmark case where we actually have the government telling a federal judge, yeah, I did it. I told Twitter to do this and I was relieved. Courtroom testimony. Why would you not include that? When you knew this would go to the Supreme Court, you did it intentionally. Either you didn't want to give me credit because you're jealous,

but it's quite interesting they go find two brown-skinned Indian guys to be the centerpiece of that. It's almost like a replacement strategy, but you don't bring out the most important findings. So Amy Coneyey barrett if you read her analysis and i read it very carefully she says in order to show this you need the evidentiary proof that twitter or facebook would not have done this without government intervention you say that's like the smoking gun that's what we have so why would you not include the most important piece of evidence yeah you see what i'm saying oh yeah so they didn't include this because if you look at this was a 6-3 ruling by the supreme court

basically giving it to the government so the government now and everyone should listen can this is sets up a precedent ruling at the highest court in the land so we so everyone else who gets thrown off social media by government intervention has to even go much harder. Okay. Much, much harder because of what these fools did. I'm talking about the,

the attorneys in Murthy versus Biden on the plaintiff side. You can't just blame the Supreme court. This was a setup, right? So the Supreme court handed it to the left, or whatever you want to call it, the swarm, as I call it, okay? By giving them, saying that government can legally censor speech. And they're retroactively protected now, which is what I predicted would happen. This is very much similar to the telecommunications they did it through Congress where Congress gave a retroactive

immunity to the when the government was using telecommunications companies to in 2000 under the Bush administration to spy on U.S citizens they retroactively Congress left and right got together and they passed a rule to um uh indemnify these companies so that's what just happened here the left and right if you look at this there's three the far right guys on the supreme court but the three you know roberts coney barrett and others colluded with with the left to screw over basically they destroyed the first amendment online yeah destroyed yeah now the next day what do they do they pass a they said okay but we're getting rid of the chevron doctrine now remember the supreme court ruling that they just did basically says any agency in the government any government can

silence the speech of you, American citizens, silently, launder censorship through social media companies. It's okay. Because they've set the bar so high because of this ridiculous lawsuit that they did not include my findings, purposely, intentionally. That's what they did. They sabotaged the American people. I say it was deliberate.

The next day, they then, the Supreme Court, court again in a 6-3 the same set of people right um rule uh to eliminate the chevron doctrine in 1984 in chevron versus i think nrdc the question has been this congress writes laws right the executive branch that's the legislative branch executive branch is supposed to enforce the laws and the judicial branch in the united states is supposed to interpret the laws okay so in that part sometimes congress probably likely on purpose will write laws that are vague right oh yeah let's say that's been a standard that's been a standard thing pelosi said we'll have to pass it to find out what's in it right with obama right there remember let's say they pass laws that are vague what they so this in

the chevron versus nrdc historic precedent-setting case in 1984 the supreme court ruled in those instances an agency which has subject matter expertise in that area we will defer to that it's called agency deference it's a principle so if the courts um have to if there's a law that comes to to be interpreted in front of the supreme court the courts or any court have to defer to the agency within the government and get their opinion first and if their opinion rules so it's really a fourth branch of government okay so that set up the chevron doctrine for the last 30 40 years right 1984 today now in the fisherman's case i think it was relentless i forget the there's two cases that came up the

supreme court ruled 6-3 to strike down the chevron doctrine which meant that congress must put together clear laws so you don't have to go through this interpretation process but here's the deal it's a shell game because you're moving away the corruption from the agencies guess what to the lobbyists because we know the lobbyists are the ones who are influencing congress to write the laws so they ever so so what you noticed was the right-wing libertarians or even the republicans are like oh my god this is great chevron doctrine has been smashed but if you go look at any of those people's twitter feeds they were silent on what the government did 24 hours before

or sorry the supreme court did the the quote-unquote the republican right-wing supreme court did to destroy free speech in the united states so look at this so so in 24 hours the supreme court passes and destroy takes down the chevron doctrine which had flaws with it to throw a bone to the to the republican right so they say oh my god great we don't have the deep state now and you can read those tweets and those facebook posts but those same grifters posting that david not one of them said anything against the same right-wing republican court which had just allowed every agency government agency agency the right to silence speech yeah destroyed the first amendment so on the one hand they took down the first amendment the supreme court and they threw a bone of oh

we've taken away the chevron doctrine but we know that that corruption that ruled the agencies through all of the chevron doctrine is just going to get shifted and consolidated over to the lobbyists in Congress. Now, I can see this as bright as day because I take a systems approach, David. The non-systems people are out there, oh my God, we got this over here. What's like showing the monkey the mirror over here so you know you don't show the banana over here right so yeah the big elephant in the room is the supreme court destroyed the first amendment the right wing republican supreme court destroyed the first amendment and that same republican right-wing supreme court threw a bone to the republican right wing saying oh my god this

is great you guys can gloat over over the Chevron doctrine being taken away. That's what happened, David. I agree. Well, I think that, you know, I agree that, you know, that is there as an appeasement to people. I think a lot of people looking at this, I've talked about the power of the bureaucracy and how it has grown over the years. I talk about regulation without representation

as much as taxation without representation. I got a couple of of comments here let me pass these on to you and get your comment on ap rumble seat rights maybe we need people like dr shiva to establish legal think tanks state to state well that's kind of what you're doing with your educational classes isn't it yeah so who is that a rumble who's? The user's name is AP Rumble Seat. I'm not sure. Is that on Rumble? Yeah, so AP Rumble, what we've done is we've created a very powerful movement. And the bottom line theme of our movement is save yourself. If you can see that, David, right? Save yourself on these.

And then we tell people, David, on the back of these cards, look what's going on. The swarm is actually killing you. Lifespan is going down. Cost of living is going up. So our position, David, is that the individual in the United States, if you want to be a real citizen must take responsibility for your life yes politicians are not going to do it there's no savior coming to do that the only person going to do that is you you must save yourself in order to save yourself you got to understand the the way systems work now the value that i'm bringing to in my run for president or and beyond

that is to explain to people look I've discovered those tools I have the tools if you want to learn it we're here but if you want to outsource your future to one of these clowns right and all of these clowns by the way you know our agents of Israel every single one of them they're all zionists and they've hijacked by the way christianity and they've duplicitly taken advantage of the american christians to think that zionism equals christianity which it isn't but what our movement educates people on the fundamental view that the future is up to you and you have to learn how to fight now i have created those tools so that's what you're referring to david so um in every state now for that matter

all over the world now and we have we're in about 100 plus countries in the united states in every state and our leaders who are running our movement the first thing they're teaching people is if you want to vote for dr shiva you also have to be willing to stand up for yourself this is not about him saving you dr shiva will offer you know you the analysis of tools i'll get on the ground and fight every day david i've been doing that all my life since i was 17 years old or 12 years old you know as an activist but the american people need to rise up bottoms up and fight and so if you looked at that debate that took place um you had one guy who's a complete liar and another guy whose brain is mush yeah right it's the one unethical individual finding a very unhealthy individual

and i was hoping that maybe the takeaway from that you know before it it before it happened there was a one piece on reason they said well maybe the best outcome of this would be if it was really really bad and it was really really bad and i was hoping and i said it on friday i said it again today i'm hoping that people will see that there as you point out there is no savior coming that's what i try to focus on all the time work bottom up that's how we've got to do this not top down the top down is totally corrupt and so i think that's a very important message that we both agree on that we've got to work from the from the bottom up and i do want to talk more about that i've got a couple of other comments here let me throw these at you before we get into the debate um texas coast uh south it'll never change as long as their federal fiat money system

to corrupt all things uh like it has what do you long as their federal fiat money system to corrupt all things like it has what do you say about that what about that the uh the dollar status is reserve and the petrodollar and all the rest of that stuff is that about to change what do you think well i think we don't want to put the symptom separate from the cause okay but it's happened david for the last 50 years and by the way in late 80s there was an academic meeting of the leading scholars in the world they got together on the east coast and a decision was made and we can do a whole video on this at this meeting that in new york that we must demoralize the american public so they never build a bottoms-up workers movement okay and so

starting from that day to today the effort of the elites has been to demoralize people to never actually get their hands dirty go out on the streets and hand out flyers mobilize the movement like we're doing for truth from health or our campaign they don't want working people out independently organizing david they don't want them doing that so the the viewers comments there have two aspects yes he's addressing a one of the many facets of corruption and ways that the swarm enslaves us through a fiat money system there are many ways they also enslave us by controlling the water supply and the food so people can't even think about the fiat money supply, okay? They're losing their intelligence even to think about that. You see, there's many, many ways that they shackle us. But regardless of that, the number one way that the establishment shackles us is to demoralize

people to just pontificate all day, talk about things but never to get up and build movements so if you think about a guy like noam chomsky he writes a book called manufacturing consent which is a detailed analysis of how the the swarm controls us but chomsky demoralizes anyone from ever building a bottoms-up movement so you'll see all these grifters on the internet talking talking talking doing deep analysis but they're not out there doing the hard practical work of how you build a movement teaching people the tools and putting the onus on them we're the only force right now on the planet doing that in a systematic way so i would encourage the viewer there come to our open house we'll teach you how to fight what you're describing

is a symptom it's an obvious symptom there are many things like that but the root of it is that for the last 70 years the american people have been demoralized to outsource their future to everything yeah to watch i agree you know wwe wrestling all day right i agree to vote for one of these politicians and when someone like me comes along bottoms up it's so new they're not even thinking wait a minute this guy's actually out there we're actually collecting our signatures to get on the ballot by the way we're on the ballot in Utah the first time a naturalized citizen has been on is on the ballot in the United States for president and people said we couldn't do it okay so and this goes to the heart of the founders

of the united states which believed in what what they and a lot of people a lot of 99 of the lawyers don't know about this principle called non-justiciable issues the founders of the united states knew the framers that there would be issues that come up that even their articles in their tenement you know the bill of rights couldn't conceive of so there they had a room for non-justiciable issues movements that would come bottoms up that would create new laws and this is why bottoms up movements are central to in the minds of the framers of the constitution they're in the subtext so you had stupid people like arnold schwarzenegger oh you can't run for president you're from you're a naturalized citizen well yeah just pontificating you can't but if you

build a bottoms-up movement and you so wait a minute I got hundreds of thousands of people want me on the ballot that becomes a reality like anything women didn't have the right to vote Afghan women had the right to vote before American women well there was a bottoms-up movement that was built right if you went to the late 1700s and you went to the federal uh supreme court and you said hey i'm a black person i should be allowed into that white restaurant they throw out the case this is why we need movements movements came we created the 14th amendment the 19th amendment and that's what we're doing, David. The framers knew this concept of non-justiciable issues. Well, I agree with you on the bottom-up solution. I absolutely do.

I do believe, though, that there is a process for changing the Constitution that would be something other than a large movement. A couple of people have left a comment here about rights. And I'd like to get your clarification about this. I'll read their comments here. Texas Coast South says only people have rights. When you work for government, you have personal rights, yes, but not rights to trample on others. And then scroll down.

Let me get the other one that was there. Another one, Rational Lampooner says we tell government what it's allowed to do. It has no rights of its own. Corporations are not people. I've said in the past, and this is my position on it, corporations are creatures of the state. They exist by government-granted privileges. States, when we talk about them, when we look at the Tenth Amendment, it talks about the powers of the states and of the peoples. If it's not delegated, if the powers are not delegated to the federal government.

So states have powers. Corporations are creatures of the state. They have privileges. People have rights because we're created in the image of God, as the Declaration of Independence acknowledges. So how do you see that fitting in? Well, David, it gets back to the earlier point um you said as an aside the there are fundamental rights that exist independent of all government you know

divine rights of people and i think the founders had this in their notion right inalienable rights so that's a central piece there now in the manifestation of the united states and laws etc right how these are translated there's three ways these we are get our rights and this is something everyone no rights are given to us because they're just inalienable we as human beings have to fight for these rights yes they may be inalienable we as human beings have to fight for these rights yes they may be inalienable just like everyone is a beautiful soul but ultimately how you express yourself on this you may be a beautiful soul people say oh he's such a beautiful soul yeah but he's a criminal he goes and kills people right so in the same way when organizations

get together yes we have these inalienable rights but do we as a human organization exhibit those rights those inalienable rights well that's where you get into this contradiction this way these this way we call the fight the struggle we have to fight for them we have to fight against these people inhibiting those and this is central to to understand. So if you look at how, quote unquote, laws come into being three ways or amendments, right? We have a two thirds, you know, majority of Congress. Right. Or you have a constitutional convention called or. The fact that rulings take place at the supreme court level precedential rulings and they are used like in the chevron case for 40 years okay because by the constitution those don't really

exist right so yeah and i have i have always had a problem with marbury versus madison because the uh it wasn't in the constitution but the Supreme Court gave themselves that power. Jefferson said, well, that's it, it's over, when he saw that essentially. So it's kind of been very clever, the way they asserted these powers that are there. But you have this fact that there's these multiple interconnected things going on,

which at a certain point in time what we call the law right and but key among all these things i think people keep forgetting and the establishment wants us to forget this they're forgetting this other piece which is the people the political process of people rising up bottoms up because the original article says only she only he can be president for example well how did that happen if it wasn't for women rising up right they went to the democrats asked for the right to uh vote right they laughed at them then the 19th amendment was created which applied the the the equal protection clause to women from the 14th Amendment. But none of that would have occurred if there was not a bottoms-up movement.

And this is what we need to understand. And I understand, and I agree with that. I think the movements are important, but I think it's also important for them to, we have to have some kind of an established thing, just like you're talking about the 19th Amendment, or we had the 18th Amendment where they prohibited alcohol, then 21 where they brought it back. So those of things are are driven from the ground up but i think it also they need to to you know dot the i and cross the t legally but david that always comes later politicians

never do what's i mean you look at in in trump versus anderson onth, 2024, this is a very important ruling. The Colorado courts denied Trump access to the ballot in Colorado. And they said that he violated the Section 3 of the Insurrection Act of the 14th Amendment. So by constitutional provisions, he had violated that. They ruled on that, and they threw him off the ballot in two court rulings. Then the Supreme Court stepped in, swooped in, and they said, whoa, whoa, whoa, you can't do this. Why? Because they said, we're going to have a patchwork. That's what was put forward, a patchwork of states, each with their own laws on how you run for president.

Very, very important ruling. And they they said even if you have a constitutional provision that's being violated at the federal level by a federal candidate the states have no right to deny ballot access this is that was a 9-0 ruling yeah because they didn't want the united states as an organism to fall apart which is what was post-civil war again these are some very very fundamental rulings are taking place and i think everyone needs to really understand what's going on so that ruling is important to my running for president because when i'm trying to get on the ballot some people are confused about what took place between naturalized and quote-unquote natural born which has never defined the 14th amendment the 19th amendment you know schneider versus rusk bowling versus sharp that there have

been other rulings including trump versus anderson so if it wasn't for trump versus anderson which is a supreme court trump would be thrown off the ballot in colorado so you do have long before constitutional amendments get passed you have these supreme court rulings which are very very powerful they sustain a body of law so yes maybe one day congress will do something but what that ruling said was only congress has a right to decide who becomes president it's quite amazing this ruling so when I'm getting on the ballot it's the same thing no state has a right to deny me ballot access by pointing to a constitutional provision if I win the presidency only Congress has a right to say you know what we now have to interpret natural

born versus naturalized citizen and then they had to have to deny me access to the presidency you say but this is quite powerful. It basically goes down to the central part of non-justiciable issues, bottoms-up movements. I've got a person here, Mad Mem, thank you, and says, good morning, David and Dr. Shiva, you're both doing God's work. Go to shiva4present.com. I don't think we mentioned that earlier, that's your website.

Is there a different website for uh the uh you know the the training uh classes that you got other than yeah yeah so the operating system what i've created is truth freedom health.com david truth freedom health.com everyone if you want to save yourself and get off the plantation i can't do it for people go to truth from health.com become a warrior scholar that training teaches people how to think from a systems approach it is the same training i used to teach at mit the elites learned this training this is how the few are able to control the many and if you want to know more about how the few control the many um the website that i recommend people go to is shattertheswarm.com shattertheswarm.com s-h-a-t-t-e-r now our campaign is fueled by this people who've gone through this training and

everyone should get one of these bumper stickers and people can go to shiva4president.com s-h-i-v-a numeral four president.com and everyone should go there get one of these bumper stickers because this gives you the ability to use your own car as a very powerful vehicle to reach a hundred thousand people a day shiva numeral four president.com but um and every thursdays david at 11 a.m and 8 p.m we have a open house and people can go to va shiva.com slash orientation or come to our town hall shiva for president.com slash town hall but those are some of the mechanics of people get involved okay and so those uh there's links to those other uh websites at shiva the number four president.com okay President.com. Okay, good. Yep.

I've got another question here. This is from DG8. It says, Dr. Shiva, what's your thoughts on APAC bragging on their own website of the 400-plus politicians they own? America first? Well, it's not America first. And by the way, the biggest person who is a beneficiary of this, who's going to be even a bigger beneficiary is trump yeah trump is the biggest zionist and you can see what i said i don't want to use those words here on the show um he you know he serves israel biden serves israel booby kennedy serves israel

all of them do to me i'm the only anti-zionist candidate. And I've been talking about this for 40 years. Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. It was Trump in 2016 who passed an executive order which said that we must equate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. Now, after October 7th, everyone knows that was an engineered attack on,-unquote israel by hamas which is funded by israel i mean it's obvious it's right in front of your face right after that attack took place i started re-educating people on the difference between zionism and judaism one of those videos in spite of all the shadow banning got i think like 50 to 70 million views david globally okay it was where i said i'm the only presidential candidate

who doesn't bleep you know zionist bleep okay um and people can go find that but that video went viral and the difference here is that on so then on december 7th mike johnson a quote-unquote christian you know zionist passed a bill in congress equating anti-zionism with anti-semitism yes and then about four weeks ago the entire congress passed a bill 310 the house to 70 saying that going into the future they will be using the definition of anti-semitism pursuant to the israel holocaust remembrance alliance which is a complete zionist nut job organization yeah they outsourced it didn't even define it themselves yeah well if you go read it the set the seven of the 11 examples they give of what is anti-semitism

is if you say anything against the state of israel including if you say israel is worse than their state that's anti-Semitism which is really anti-Zionism okay which is a political ideology so Trump is one of the biggest Zionist blah you know bleep bleepers okay you can fill that blank in Biden is so and booby Kennedy booby Kennedy said the Palestinian people are the most pampered people on the planet and then he compared the people in gaza to nazis that we must go in there and wipe them out and look at how great germany became after we wiped out the nazis so if we wipe these people out so why is this because all of these people are part of the swarm all of them they serve israel they do not serve the american working people and if we want to those people even the free palestine

movement has been infiltrated by quote-unquote liberal zionists who keep talking about you know cease fire now they've been saying that for 40 years cease fire now basically means israel gets to move two steps forward one step back it doesn't mean end the occupation very different slogan david we must end the occupation of america and this viewer is rightfully saying that that apac is gloating that they control congress and congress is a representative body of the american people which means between us and congress now is aipac which means zionism yeah and central to the founders was that congress ultimately is a representative body of we the people so the house 90 95 of those people are controlled by um aipac cynthia mckinney who was a congresswoman who just endorsed me, she was thrown out years ago, years ago for bringing this out, for exposing the involvement of Zionism in Congress.

Well, I think it's pretty clear. You know, it was also DeSantis jumped into that, you know, to get money. And so equating criticism of a political state, Israel, with anti-Semitism, and then making it a criminal offense, the type of stuff that we're starting to see in this law that everybody's being concerned about in Germany, but also in Ireland. They're doing that as well. We're going to make hate speech an imprisonable offense

and lock people up in prison. Well, they started doing that. The Republican Party did that in Florida with that. And so I think that's two very important things. I don't support any kind of hate speech regulation. I think you can't have freedom of speech if there's going to be such a thing as free speech, I think. But David, it just happened.

When was it? A couple of months ago when they passed that bill in Congress. It was, again, if you notice, all of this is being done by the republican right that's right that's right the republican right everyone listening you magatards are the ones who are supporting this yep that's right wearing make america great again and literally supporting israel so we have now a law that's going to go to congress which said which is going to give the department of education infinite rights to take away money from schools that let's say support let's say mit tomorrow wanted to invite me to speak on anti-zionism they would say you can't invite that speaker he's anti-semitic equating

anti-zionism with anti-semitism will remove your federal funds or let's say a high school wanted invite me to come speak david right and this is being done by the so-called republican right not by the woke democrats but the republican right is supporting massive fascism pro-israel anti-american interests and this is and the spirit of it this is donald trump that's why when i looked at that debate david i don't know if you want to go there yeah we're getting close to the end of the show but we got a few minutes and we can go over a little bit uh give us your take on the show now you just like some other people uh many people live streamed the debate even though some cnn they did it on twitter must said go ahead and sue me this is uh important so you had commentators who are doing it and commenting live uh you did it as as a

candidate and responding to the questions tell us a little bit about that of course people can see that on twitter i bet you if we had streamed cnn we would have been sued but not booby kennedy okay yeah after i decide to do it then booby steals everything we do okay booby kennedy is an agent of the swarm that's who he is he's he's fake independent he's a zionist puppet okay completely they're all so but anyway if you looked at that debate separate from the fact so what i saw interesting was we know biden isn't on on a set of cocktails right that keep his brain from going mush yeah we know here Trump is just a liar. He'll say anything he needs to say

to get as much money as he can. And we've had this discussion with other people like Alex Jones does the same thing, right? Even though he knows things are wrong, he'll do it to raise money, okay? So Trump is a master grifter. So here's a lying master grifter who has sex with prostitutes, you know, while his wife is pregnant.

And over here you have a guy, Biden, whose brain has essentially become mush. Now, what I found fascinating is, again, if you go to central principles, anything you see on mainstream media is something they want you to see. Yeah, that's right. Okay. So they wanted people to see a decrepit Biden. Now, how do they do that? Did they change his medical cocktail mix before that debate because he looked horrible and the next day they gave him the right cocktails where he looks really strong so i would i mean it's amazing right yeah so the puppy uppers yeah yeah right so i would argue

that someone remember the swarm has its own internal conflicts. Someone has decided they maybe don't want Biden. They want somebody else because they're going to serve Zionism even better. Okay. So I found it quite profound that they made, we knew that how bad they made Biden look. Okay. And the next day he's going so i just want everyone to alert people that everything that you see on media is theater it is brought to you by the swarm to serve the swarm and you know looking at the the fact that they the timing that they did it we've always had the debates after the convention neither of these guys has been nominated as the official person right but they're debating each other and and it's all usually the conventions are in late august you don't have the first debate until the end of September.

And then you have September, mid-October, latter part of October. I mentioned this many times to the audience. This time, they just leapfrogged all that stuff. And I think it was for the purpose of sabotaging him and getting somebody else in there. Do you have any predictions as to who you think it'll be? Well, I've said this from day one. i've always said that they wanted gavin newsom you know i think that's where they want you know someone in there maybe they'll throw a brown face like

kamala harris in there who's a brahman who's also a zionist it was all you know but i think that's their game but it was obvious to everyone watching they want biden out whoever the within the swarm right they have their own internal conflicts and you can see all of silicon valley supporting trump in fact cnn is supporting trump right everybody's like how did this happen we never knew that he had any cognitive issues yeah exactly and the next day everyone should go watch his rally next day biden's all fired up da da da da da because he got the right cocktails. Yeah. So whoever engineered this, they make sure he got the wrong cocktails before the debate.

And the right. And to your point, David, the timing of these debates. Why would you do this debate when general election debates are not even supposed to take place after the convention? So everything people see elections are selections. Yeah. And it's all theater. Yeah. Well, we're right at the end of the program but let me let me get you you talk a lot about the swarm that's your term uh define that a

little bit for people uh how do you see the swarm is that the globalists is that the bureaucracy the deep state how do you see the swarm yeah so david i have a much more precise and tangible and accessible definition so it takes away a lot of the quote-unquote you know what the left or other people call conspiracy right and if people go to shatter the swarm.com okay shatter form.com you will understand it so i really encourage everyone if you want to start your first level of learning how to fight start with knowing who thy enemy is who's a swarm they're not a particular geographical location israel or the pentagon or some location north korea first of all it's not spatially based nor is it not temporally based something over time you know at this location the swarm exists and now it doesn't okay and it's not

consolidated in a particular set of people like the quote-unquote the rothschild it's not or the quote-unquote the jews or the quote-unquote wall street it is a highly interconnected telepathic interconnected group of people who may have their own contradictions from time to time because they it's wwe wrestling right right blah blah blah but overall they move together as a blob if you watch you know those um uh star i think these birds that move over the ocean oh yeah right yeah see that they move like this one time they're moving one one group may move this way but they ultimately move together okay that is what the swarm is it's a much more precise understanding. Okay. Of how, and you can learn how the few control the 8 billion of us. And so I've taken complex control

systems, made it very accessible. So everyone should go to shatter the swarm.com. Step one, if you want to save yourself, understand who the enemy is. Step two, David is everyone needs to understand this graph here. If you can see it, lifespan in the United States is going down. Cost of living is going up. These people are literally killing you. And everyone should go to shatter the swarm. But I am here to provide people tools on how to fight. But you must want to take responsibility for yourself.

You have to want to save yourself. If you don't want to save yourself, that's why we're in this condition. If you look at this graph, this has been going on since 1970, David. We keep thinking, oh, Bernie's going to do it. Oh, Trump's going to do it. Oh, boobie may do it now. Oh, Biden may do it. We got to get off our butts and be real Americans. We have to want to fight for ourselves. That is the only way out of it. Now, my run for president gives people the opportunity to have someone like me lead people to the extent my leading is, hey, here's the water. This is where you go. You want to be a good horse and drink the water. That's what I've created, that

water, that mana, which is truth, freedom, health. But if you don't want to do that, well, please, I will give you a recommendation letter to go vote for Biden or boobie because you're going to be slowly cooked like the frog. So that's what our movement's about, David. It's really about personal responsibility. And that's what I like. That's what I like about it. You know, I think we put way too much information and too much hope on the presidency and your message that we've got to do it ourselves. We've got to do it from the bottom up. That is exactly what needs to happen. And I agree with you about the swarm. It isn't a particular place.

Global governance is distributed, and it's a good analogy that you've got with the flocks of birds that are out there. Thank you so much for joining us again. People can go to shattertheswarm.com, or you can go to shiva4president.com. Thank you very much, Dr. Shiva. Appreciate it. Thanks, David. Be well. Best to you and your for president.com. Thank you very much, Dr. Shiva. Appreciate it. Thanks,

David. Be well, best to you and your son and your family. Thanks for having me on the show. Be well. Thank you, David. You too.

Bye-bye. Bye-bye. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That

is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you.