The David Knight Show - Mon 20May24 The Birds & the Bees — How They're Attacking Our Food with FAKE Pandemic Fear

Episode Date: May 20, 2024

(2:00)The contours of world government conspiracy (no theory)Billionaire says chances are 40% for civil war in USA.  Is that too low?Mainstream ignores online race hatred by mass shooter-wannabe(36:54) The face of dystopian tyranny — America's political prisonersAssange — wins in extradition fight, will get to appealJ6er — 40 months without trial, 40 consecutive days in sensory deprivation(51:15) Black barrister says UK's traditional wigs are "culturally insensitive" and demands the practice be struck because of his afro-hairstyle.  Who is being "culturally insensitive"? Should they ignore him and let him "wig-out" or should they "flip their wigs" to please him? (59:35) Thank you to supporters () The Birds and the Bees — Pre-Pandemic "Crimes" to Centralize Control of the People Through FoodNZ beekeeper forced to destroy 10,000 bee boxes when only 2 boxes tested positive for "spores" — not a single bee sick, but $2M of property destroyed without compensationBe careful of alt-media mixing in FEAR of "gain-of-function bird flu" even as they deride the alarmismBird Flu? ALL vaccines cultivated in chicken eggs prior to 2019A rogues gallery of Trump's CDC/WarpSpeed Robert Redfield, Mitt Romney, FOX News, mainstream — all pushing lies about bird flu(1:38:43) "Bird Flu Hits New York" — a classic case of mainstream lies and sensationalism (1:47:42) Raw Milk — "the New Ivermectin" Media's new absurd, juvenile vilification campaign (2:00:36) Planned Parenthood: Caught in a 2nd Murder-for-Hire The persecution of investigative journalist David Daleiden court discovery has revealed Planned Parenthood and NIH in a second murder-for-hire scheme. (2:10:08) Principles? Some news that shows who has them and who doesn'tElderly woman (76), sentenced to an additional 27 months for her pro-life speech, defies court fines and probation, sings "Ave Maria"RFKj flips again on abortion, walks back full term abortion statementFed court rules school district can sexualize and groom kids from Kindergarten to 5th grade and parents can't opt outNew York Times celebrates family denying the Christian faith to embrace their son who has been genderized by college.  And the NYT engages in some interesting "theology" to explain away the Bible's explicit and clear view of only 2 genders(2:33:31) How can AI be brilliant and idiotic at the same time?  It makes sense if you understand how it works, but it also makes it an extremely dangerous and useful tool of the government that created itOh, the irony — OpenAI warns a subreddit about copyright violation of its logoMicrosoft has yet another epic fail at a demoCIA's air-gapped AI — they don't trust the internet THEY created?How AI works and why it can be such an idiot savantWas memory transferred with a heart transplant? Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Every dollar counts to keep up with the bills or to help with the cost of raising a family. A little bit extra can make a difference. You might be eligible for benefits and credits, like the Canada Workers' Benefit, the Canada Child Benefit, the Disability Tax Credit, and the GST-HST Credit. You may also be able to get your taxes done for free. Find out if you qualify. Visit Canada.ca slash EveryDollarCounts for more information. A message from the Government of Canada. Using free speech to free minds.

You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 20th of May, year of our Lord 2024. Well, today we're going to look at the birds and the bees. Yes, I know, there's a lot of people who haven't figured that out yet, or they pretend that they don't know. But it's not actually going to be about that. We will cover some of that, actually. The New York Times has an interesting point. They try to argue multiple genders into the Bible. The New York Times. Completely out of their depth. Anyway, we'll talk about the birds and the bees because this is about an attack on

our food supply. And we can see it with the bird flu. We can see it with the destruction of a massive amount of farm equipment associated with bees. They came after a beehive making manuka honey in New Zealand. Destroyed over $2 million worth of stuff. No bees were sick. This is the game they're playing with the PCR stuff. We're also going to talk about artificial intelligence. How can it be hallucinating and yet useful at the same time? And to whom is it useful? We'll talk about that. I think one of the best explanations I've seen about that contradiction. We'll be about that. I think one of the best explanations I've seen about that contradiction.

We'll be right back. I want to begin quickly with the news, however. There was an interesting article by Jeffrey Tucker, The Trouble with World Government. And he began by saying, and it's kind of an interesting back and forth, did we really have a win? You know, we've had a couple of situations where Elon Musk has challenged courts in different countries, one in Brazil, another in Australia.

In each of these cases, he's won. And so Jeffrey Tucker says, well, at least that's one setback for world government. Perhaps it is. But he goes on to talk about how world government at its core is really a technocracy. He even talks about H.G. Wells and other issues like that. And he's absolutely right about it. And he understands that world government has already commenced. We already have world governance.

Folks, look, if you look at what's happened in the federal government, the evolution of the tyranny from the time that the founders created it, it was immediately, you know, they ignored some of the things that they themselves had just put in the Constitution, like how the electoral college would operate and the number of representatives that they would have and things like that. So they immediately began ignoring certain aspects of the Constitution that they themselves had put in. And then over periods of time, it's gradually dissolved to where it is there as a outline.

It's there as an aspiration, and we should keep it as an aspiration. And we should keep it for people to understand those who swear to it as a condition of their authority, and then they don't follow it, then they have no authority. That's a useful thing for us. It's a useful thing for us for the doctrine of the lesser magistrate. If we can find somebody at the local level and stand with them, they can't stand alone.

Somebody at the local level that will stand against this tyranny, the law is on their side. Right is on their side. And as I said, talking about war, it's so important to have a moral foundation, to understand that you're in this war because you were attacked, for instance and what the motivations are not that it is something that they want to run because they want to make a lot of money because they want to test equipment because they want to train people

whatever their their machiavellian justification for war might be but the fact that this is a righteous cause and it's very important to us to be standing for the right and we'll talk about that when we get into artificial intelligence the importance of truth the importance of truth it is more important than just winning a debate or being factually right it's what gives us the ability to stand we talk about not having a backbone having having no character, having no principles and that type of thing. We don't want to be a jellyfish. And if you have no principles, you have no basis of being able to stand. So it is, it's paramount to have those principles and we'll get to that.

But as Jeffrey Tucker says, well, if you talk about world government, it's not a conspiracy theory. It's what they've said that they wanted. They've put the plans out there it's amazing to me that they continue to use that term conspiracy theory when it is clearly a conspiracy a conspiracy with a global elite a very well-honed conspiracy that's been practiced and repeated and applied in many different ways he says in 1919 hg wells inspired by the league of nations by woodrow wilson one of our uh betraying presidents became so excited about the idea that he wrote a sweeping reinterpretation of world history that extended from the 9th century bc until the present moment it was called the outline of history the goal of the book was to turn on its

head the popular wig theory from the previous century which saw history as a story of ever more freedom for individuals and away from powerful states wells told a story of tribes turning to nations and regions with ever less power to the people and ever more power to the dictators and to the planners. That's what he wanted. His real purpose was to chronicle and defend exactly this. So he wrote his outline of history to essentially say we want a dictatorship. We want a dictatorship that's going to be run by the technocracy.

And of course, later on, he did the shape of things to come. Then it was made into a movie things to come. And that was, so this was initially in 1919, uh, within about another dozen years or so he had done the book and the movie had come out in the early thirties and Elon Musk grandfather had set up the technocracy in Canada and tried to overthrow the,

uh, established government there and install a technocracy they tried him for treason he beat the rap and he beat it out of canada he went to south africa that's why elon musk came back from south africa and yet those technocratic ideals are there and so when we look at that versus these wins in australia. And in both cases, you had courts that said, well, you may not like it, but you can't censor this worldwide, which is what they were trying to do. Australia and Brazil were saying, you've got to censor this content worldwide, worldwide. And the judge said, we don't have a jurisdiction to do that. I don't know how long that will last.

Judges are political appointees, and this is being politically pushed on us from the top down everywhere. And so the question is, since Musk is a technocrat, since Musk's family is involved in that, I really don't see him as a freedom fighter. There may be some intermediate battles on which he is on our side, but ultimately he is our foe. And he is also our foe because the progress shape of history is not fundamentally about freedom. For politics, yes. And by the way, there's an excellent book, very quick read,

The Discovery of Freedom by Rose Wilder Lane. I really liked that. We use that with our kids as well. It's so well written, so directly written. Rose Wilder Lane is the one who wrote the Little House on the Prairie series about her mother. But she was one who was an excellent writer as i said very quick read very very direct very understandable you can read the little house in the prairie

books to kids they understand it they understand the discovery of freedom as well and so it's important for us to understand the mechanisms that will make us free in the political world and to see how those are developed in history because we're losing them. But folks, the sweep of history is ultimately about God working in this world through Christ. So we don't make an idol out of the government, but we do need to understand how the levers are applied. And we need to understand that what you're seeing happening here, the technocrats, just like the Uniparty in Washington,

is not monolithic. You have different factions, and they're really coming after each other because it's a game of thrones. And so that's the way you should understand this. It isn't like Elon Musk is this benevolent billionaire who's going to put his fortune on the line to save free speech for all of us. That is unbelievably naive. But that is the view that has been put out there by Alex Jones and a lot of people who have worshipped at his feet,

hoping that he'll give them something. And he has. He has. The thesis of H.G. Wells' book was valuable, however, in some historical respects, jeffrey tucker even though it was genuinely bizarre he imagined a future world ruled by a tiny elite of the smartest people who would plan all economies all information flow all migration patterns all governance systems while crushing national ambitions, free enterprise, traditions, and constitutions.

Folks, that's the technocracy. That's the global government in a nutshell. Everything they want to do. He said it was crazy stuff and it didn't happen, even though he doesn't mention Joshua Haldane, who tried to do it, actually, in Canada. But the efforts never stopped with a certain class of intellectuals. Following World War II, you had similar efforts,

the UN, he said. We had the World Bank, the IMF. He says none of these worked out either. Well, I wouldn't be so sure, quite frankly. When you look at their agenda and if you understand what the purpose of these various organizations these globalist organizations are they have their uh their meetings where they get together face to face you know not over zoom so that people can watch what they're doing they get together face to face as i point out many times ed ball who was um

uk uh official eye up and he goes to the side of the bildberg meeting karen got the video of him he didn't have his badge couldn't find his badge he opens up his suitcase to see if he can find it in there he's got a little roll-on suitcase and the contents of the suitcase dropped out and it was all paperwork, all paperwork. I don't know where the rest of his luggage was, if it was on the way or whatever. I mean, didn't even see a toothbrush. It's all paperwork. And so the, um, uh, they have their meetings where they make their plans and private and secret.

Uh, they put these meetings, these these things out there they're meeting with the media they're meeting with these multi leaders of these multinational corporations people like alex carp i was talking about last week with palantir they have a lot of money they have the ability to make this stuff happen this is a fascist system a merger of states and corporations and of course the corporations that are the news media, the big head of the biggest newspapers and organizations are there. Uh, they do it secretly Bilderberg and some other places. They do it very publicly at Davos and world economic forum.

So there's no question about what they want to do. Uh, but, uh, you know, it is a detailed plan. And the important part about it for the UN, for IMF and other things, they do have mechanisms to push this along. And the UN, more than anything else, is there to create the plans. And the World Economic Forum is there to bring in the businesses so they can fund this stuff. It's just it's very much like politics, you know, as, uh, um, you had, um, uh, HL Minkin say, um, an election is, um, um, an advanced auction of stolen goods. Well, that's, what's going on at Bilderberg. It's an advanced auction of stolen goods.

Uh, we're going to do this and this. And then, uh, that means that you're going to have monopoly over the food supply and distribution. What are you willing to put in to get that? It's just that simple. They are reorganizing and changing everything for world governance, and it is a quid pro quo thing, an advanced auction of stolen goods. And they're going to steal everything from us if we don't stop them.

And so the purpose of these groups, he says, well, the U.N. turned out to be a disappointment for many. I'm afraid I disagree with that. I think they're getting their way. The purpose of the U.N. is to create this outline and to push it out to everybody. Just like the purpose of the World Economic Forum is to get the actual moving parts together and get the funding together and that type of thing. They work in a distributed way. And we need to understand that or we won't uh if we think that there is these individual groups

and there's which one of them is going to be the world while they're working as a network it's a distributed network of government it's secretive it's a cartel he says the drive to unite europe was advertised as a liberal move to inspire cooperation on trade and travel to make economic cooperation possible but that was just a pitch the reality of the eu was creation of a bureaucracy in brussels that would override the sovereignty of nations and force deference to a new central state in europe that actually had no historical preference precedent it was an experiment in region-wide government planning and actually we need to take a step back from that as well because it was what was proposed by Zbigniew Brzezinski,

Mikhail Brzezinski's father. And he said, well, we will consolidate things economically. This is what is different about this world war that has been going on since the Second War. It's a world war, a been going on since the second war it's a world war a very long range plan by the global elite to control us through economics rather than having a war to get what they want they will use war to call the population but rather than the old style thing well you know we would like to have this area on the map so we're going to invade it that type of thing like you saw with world war

ii and earlier instead of that their conquest is through subversion it's a banker world government that's why when he talks about the imf and the world bank and well they didn't get what they want no actually it's running through the financial stuff. That's why the CBDC is the final linchpin in all of this. It's all about the money. And what they have, what they were talking about, it's a big new Brzezinski in the 70s, but of course they'd been working toward it, was, have a consolidation economically. So what we would do is we would create a trade zone.

Well, yeah, great. Everybody's in favor of that, right? I have a free trade zone in Europe. People can trade within it. You know, that's what made America prosperous. It was a free trade zone within because of the commerce clause. That was the purpose of it. Say that you're not going to tax goods coming from Tennessee to North Carolina

or vice versa, that type of thing. And, um, so they create a free trade zone, but the goal from the very beginning from the second Bilderberg group was to have a common currency that then gave them economic planning capabilities. If we've got a common currency, you've got a common European central bank, these other things, now they've got economic planning. And so they began with the free trade, you know, absence of

the taxes and stuff that nobody wants. And then what they do is through that freedom, through that free trade, they gradually enact a system of regulations and controls and economic union. And they would do that in three different areas, right?

Europe, North America, and Asia. And that's what these treaties were about. Trans-Pacific, Transatlantic partnership that they put together to create these free trade zones and then to start to link them together, these three zones. That's one of the reasons why he called it the trilateral commission and of course they really liked what he was coming up with he also talked about between two ages and that book he talked about the coming technocratic age is what the big new brzezinski called it but i said we'll know everything that you're going to

do before you do it that's being brought in with artificial intelligence now. Quite frankly, you know, when we look at AI, and I'm going to get to that in a moment, but when we look at AI, it has a lot of hallucination. How does it put this stuff together? Is it really thinking? Is it conscious? No, it's not. And why does it come up with hallucinations and things like that? Well, it's inherent in its design, but it can be very useful for some things. It can be very useful for surveillance because that's the thing that it is the best at, and that is identifying patterns and similarities and bringing them together. It's precisely what the surveillance state wants.

That's why the surveillance state created it and we have to understand that um you know when when we uh uh when we look at artificial intelligence it is the enabling technology of the big brother surveillance state, omniscient, omnipresent. And in order to give that information to the government to make it omnipotent, to make it godlike. He says, one way to understand the pandemic response, COVID, is as a further experiment in world government, a way for the elites to broadcast to the entire planet

that they can achieve global cooperation when they want to. In most every nation, Jeffrey Tucker, the response was the same in terms of timing and protocol. How many times have I said this? Do you realize that we have global governance? Just take a look at the pandemic. Do you think that it makes a difference to have donald duck or goofy in as president look at what trump did he did exactly the same thing that trudeau did at exactly the same time and none of it made any sense but it was all part of the global plan and it doesn't matter what your personal preference is in terms of these personalities or your philosophical supposedly the philosophical basis of the political party that you support that's just there to deceive you it's just there to gain your trust so pick take your pick trump or trudeau

they're going to do the same thing as far as these global pandemics and the the existential challenges to us yes there'll be other real differences out there but when you look at their relentless march to world government and to a surveillance state and just maybe we should just have a new acronym for that instead of saying surveillance state just call it the serve state because you will be serving the state you'll be a slave to the state you just spell it s-u-r-v serve state what they did not tell anyone is that none of this constituted common public health sense measures, but rather amounted to an experiment without any precedent in the history of humanity. Nowhere had all this cockamamie stuff

ever been implemented. Only crazy people had recommended it in the past. Well, yeah, the CIA. They had recommended and practiced these exact measures since two months before 9-11. You know, we need to understand what the history is here fully. Yeah, people are starting to put this thing together, but we still are missing some parts of this.

And that's why I mentioned this. Jeffrey Tucker's got a lot of this stuff right. He says, but he's missing some of the context here, the bigger context, the context of the cia germ games for example no question that a nascent world government is in operation today he says well i'm good i'm glad that he he saw that that's good that he sees that because that is really what we have now we have um actually on friday this featured mainstream media, billionaire investor Ray Dalio warns that the USA is on the brink

and he estimates there's more than a one in three chance of civil war. He thinks it's about a 40% chance of civil war. Is he right? You know, the first American civil war, as I've said many times, is not about slavery, but this one will be about slavery. It'll be about your slavery. And I say the first American many times is not about slavery but this one will be about slavery it'll be about your slavery and i say the first american civil war was not about slavery because we had exactly the same thing happening at exactly the same time 1861 to 65 in italy as i've talked about this many times it was part of the industrial revolution it was part of the consolidation of the nation

state and that was happening not just in America, but it was happening throughout Europe, even happened in South America. We had wars that consolidated, got a change from the agrarian society to the industrialized society and created the consolidated nation state. That was happening everywhere. That was what the American Civil War was about. Slavery was unique in the sense that it was involved in America, but these other agrarian societies, these other societies were organized along agrarian and decentralized lines, and they had a civil war at the same time as well. And we nearly had a civil war in 1830s, I point out many times, a nullification crisis, and yet they backed off at that time because the timing was not right.

The timing is right now. And nowhere in here does Ray Dalio say anything about the fourth turning or these seasonal cycles of history. And I've said for the longest time, you know, we go back and look at the previous fourth turnings. Previous one was World War II and the Great Depression. Prior to that, the American Civil War. Prior to that, the American, um, was the, um, was world war two and the great depression prior to that, the American civil war prior to that, the American revolutionary war, Strauss and how it went back 500 years looking at

that history, but, um, I've said for the longest time, this one is going to be really, really big, really, really big, because this is global in a way that even world war two and the Great Depression were not global. And it is changing fundamentally. You know, even though World War II and the Great Depression were global, this is going to be a far more fundamental change because of the technocrats and because of technocracy. And so as we go into this fourth turning where they try to establish the technocracy, I've said many times, we may wind up with all three that we've had in America,

all three fourth turnings. We may wind up with revolutionary war, civil war, and a world war all at the same time. So it's not surprising to see him say this. I don't think he's got any particular insights. It's Forbes magazine, which is,

I'm sorry, fortune, fortune magazine, which is looking at, of course, they're very impressed by the fact that he is a billionaire investor, very successful. It reminds me of fiddle on the roof if I were a rich man, right? So the most important men would come to me and they would fawn to me. They would ask me to advise them.

And it wouldn't matter if I was right or wrong, because if you're rich, they think you really know. Well, of course. You know, we should bow and scrape to these billionaires. Whether it's Ray Dalio or Trump or Elon Musk, because they really know, don't they? Well, actually, no, not necessarily. They don't really know, don't they? Well, actually, no, not necessarily. They don't really know. They have a lot of money. This one person said, the rich are really different from us.

They have a lot of money. But they suffer from the same blind spots, the same struggles that everybody in humanity has. So as we look at this, what are they pushing us towards? And I think it's kind of interesting to see Biden speaking this weekend, especially because there is a story that really hasn't been covered by the mainstream media at all. New American had the story, a would-be mass shooter. And they stopped this guy. He was bragging about it on social media, what he was going to do. And it was all about a race war, except it was race war against whites.

So they're not interested in that because they want to push that. Quite frankly, they want to push a race war. And I've said this for the longest time. You go back and you look at thexists who were marching through the institutions but especially bill ayers and bernadine dorn and the weather underground they really focused on a race war because they understood that a class the class warfare as the marxists had used in europe really wasn't working so they needed a race war and we still have these um these marxists that are running our government are still pushing that they're pushing it through the universities just as um bill airs and bernadine

dorn pushed it through education yeah that's what they're doing his name is joshua cobb he was planning a major mass shooting with 10 plus body count even though he sees with hatred. Oh, wait a minute. Hatred itself is supposed to be a crime now, right? He posted on social media about how he intended to target a specific racial group, uh, but, um, he's black and his targets were white. And so it's not going to be reported by the mainstream media. Uh, the Marine Corps times reported the story and I got it from the New American. He was saying, I want some of the things that he posted, I want to cause mayhem on the white

community. The reason I specifically want to target white people is because as a black male, they will never understand my struggles. Never is all uppercase. Now, that's precisely the hatred, the bigotry, the lies being pushed by Joe Biden at a commencement address this weekend. And as you listen to him say that, I want you to remember that Biden, more than any other individual out there, certainly more than any other individual in the government now, was responsible for the war on drugs, for the mandatory minimums that locked up so many black people.

He was responsible for civil asset forfeiture. Biden has been opposed, antithetically, totally opposed to the idea of natural rights, opposed to the Bill of Rights. And everything that he has done has been in opposition to that. And yet, he is out there now cynically talking about he's going to legalize marijuana, perhaps at the federal level, for votes. The guy who did more to lock up people on the basis of marijuana mandatory minimums is now going to pretend to be something he's never been. And isn't now. And so he was pushing this race war at a commencement address.

Listen to the hate, the bigotry, the lies. Today, you missed your high school graduation. You started college just as George Floyd was murdered. And there was a reckoning on race. It's natural to wonder if democracy you hear about actually works for you. What is democracy? If black men are being killed in the street,

what is democracy? Betrayal of broken promises still leave black communities behind. What is democracy? You have to be ten times better than anyone else to get a fair shot. Most of all, what does it mean, as we've heard before, to be a black man who loves his country, even if it doesn't love him back in equal measure?

Hardly anybody clapped. Hardly anybody clapped. Isn't that that interesting not even at that black college yeah democracy in other words democracy is futile burn the place down burn the place down now you got to be 10 times better than anybody has he ever noticed the dei stuff i thought merit didn't even matter anymore we're just allocating spots based on their categories that they create of skin color sexual orientation whatever else they may come up with uh so um yeah this guy i currently he said lack the means necessary to kill as many as i intend to but one day i will have the available resources. Yeah, you know, ammunition is very expensive. Difficulty even practice here.

These included, the targets included a Jersey Strong Gem, that's a brand name, Jersey Strong, an Aldi grocery store in Mercer County. He said he picked those places because he thought it would be white people who were unarmed there. My rampage will soon happen. He said, I plan to continue accumulating the necessary equipment needed to execute. Once all equipment is in, time will then tell you will all die.

He's obviously deranged, but anybody who would do something like this is also obviously deranged. So that doesn't mean, well, yeah, he's just talking crazy. Yeah, well, people who are crazy talk crazy they do crazy things as well it took him a while to do anything about it actually as well um he was writing that stuff in may of 2023 a year ago so again you know this is um the fbi but i think it's interesting that it was not publicized by the mainstream media, even if it was. There's no indication that he was pushed into it, as they're known to do so many times. No indication yet, at least.

So Cobb expressed a genocidal desire to exterminate an entire race. To the mainstream media, however, this is a page 38 story. And to Congress, there will be no monitoring of this kind of hate. Because if they were to do that, they would see that it is coming from the very universities that they want to monitor for anti-Semitism, but not for this kind of race war hatred because they want that kind of race war. This is why I say, what should your reaction be? Well, I'm going to get them before they get me, right? No. This is why I say all along, them before they get me, right? No. This is why I say all along that, yes, we want to have freedom,

and we can study the discovery of freedom and things that have changed it along the way. But the founders of this country understood that liberty is a blessing from God. And the key thrust is that we understand that if we follow god which means that we follow the way that he tells us to act that means that we move to take down these barriers that we treat everybody as brother and sister in Christ and that type of thing. We understand that we are all created by God. We understand that we all have our faults. If we bring these things together, I don't see anything uniting us except for Christ.

Because frankly, you look at these politicians and they are dividing people left and right. And even when we report about these various things, it can be, you know, and we need to understand that there is a strong division between light and darkness. We don't want to run away from that and just say, oh, nothing matters. Kumbaya. No, we need to understand what the truth is. We need to understand what is right. We also need to understand that it can be uniting.

And that is the only way that we're going to get over this Hatfield and McCoy, this genocidal desire for people to be purged here, which is what they're selling in the Marxist universities. That's why it bothers me so much to see them so narrowly focused on this one thing. They're missing the whole picture here. It's just special privileges for a group that's going to give them money they don't care about the bigger problem so he says um in this article there's a lot to unpack here first is a as black reverend jesse lee peterson's often

said the anti-white hatred that cobb reflects has been ginned up by demagogues, by media propagandists, and it's totally unjustifiable. And, of course, it's been ginned up by the universities, especially. Second, he aimed to target places where people be unarmed. That supports the gun-free zone argument. As a matter of fact, they point out in this article, remember 2013, we talked about this, you had some journalists go around to the homes of some, had some activists go to the homes of some pro-gun,

gun-control journalists. People want to take the guns from other people. So we got a sign. I noticed that you were really with us on gun control. Would you put this sign up? This home is proudly gun free. Well, they'd write about that all the time. They didn't want to put that sign on their home.

One of them even said, that'd be an open invitation, don't you think, for somebody to come here and rob us? See, the mere presence of firearms restrains evil as uh george washington said we're going to take a quick break and when we come back we're going to give you an update as to what happened with julian assange the court met this morning to consider the extradition appeal and there has been a decision and we'll tell you what that is when we return. Thank you. Making sense common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, Julian Assange has spent seven years, I think it is, in the Ecuadorian embassy.

They were trying to extradite him for a charge that ultimately they dropped in Sweden. Said it was a setup. Then he has spent five years in Belmarsh, a very harsh prison, and there had been a court order to have him extradited to the United States, and he appealed. And as part of that appeal, they had the high court in London met today to see whether or not they would allow this extradition to occur. They said they had to be satisfied with U.S. assurances that Assange would not face the death penalty, that he could rely on the First Amendment right to free speech if he faced a U.S. trial for spying. The British court did not believe that the U.S. would guarantee that stuff. And we all know they wouldn't.

U.S. government doesn't support free speech in any way, shape, or form anymore. It doesn't support a fair trial. It tries to kill its enemies. They've got their communication management units really harsh. Look at what they're doing to the January 6th people. Look at what they're doing to the people who are being imprisoned for violating the FACE Act. 76-year-old woman just given several years in prison what did she do she peacefully stood there and tried to persuade people

not to kill their child can't have that not in america so yeah our justice system is a dystopian sci-fi novel. And they did not accept that. And so now this court says he's got a right to appeal the extradition, which is important, but it still doesn't, you know, he's still in Belmarsh prison while he's appealing this. So what he won was the right to appeal extradition. If he had lost this case today, they would have shipped him out.

I'll just remind you that Julian Assange, all of these charges against him were put in there by Bill Barr. Bill Barr, who was George H.W. Bush's attorney general, is a much younger man, and he had been George H.W. Bush's right-hand man at the CIA when George H.W. Bush rebuilt it after the church hearings. And he was a bushy, he was CIA from the very beginning. And you have to ask yourself, why is Trump appointing people like Gina Haspel? Why is he appointing people like Bill Barr? Is he one of the baddies?

Well, yes, he is. So I call him Benedict Donald. And it was under the Trump administration, not under the Obama administration, that they created these massive crimes far over the top. And it was done just, you know, very short time after Trump put in bill bar after he got rid of Jeff sessions. And now Jeff sessions resigned under pressure and he put in bill bar.

Now, if you think that Trump is loyal to anybody, look at Julian Assange, who helped him to get into office and even said, you know, look, I'm going to release this information about Hillary Clinton. He said, we don't know what Donald Trump is, but we do know that Hillary Clinton is a warmonger, a criminal. It remains to be seen what Trump is. Well, now we know what Trump is, quite frankly, just because of, you know, if nothing else, look at Julian Assange. Trump has absolutely no loyalty to the people who help him. Trump has absolutely no loyalty to the principles of the First Amendment or free speech or anything else like that. He signed off on all this.

He refused to pardon Julian Assange. I remember Alex Jones. I've got inside information. He's going to pardon him before he leaves office midnight tonight. Yeah. Alex Jones, I've got inside information. He's going to pardon him before he leaves office midnight tonight. Yeah. Alex Jones. Always right. Right?

No. And then we'll take a look at the January Sixers. Jake Lang emerges from 36 days in sensory deprivation chamber. Perhaps the treatment of J6 prisoners had some enlightening effect on the British court system when they see how corrupt, how lawless, how evil, how vindictive, how draconian the federal government and its so-called justice system has become. They spent 36 days in sensory deprivation chamber. Jake's social media team released a triumphant tweet earlier today, marking his high spirited release.

And this was on Friday with a hallmark that what doesn't kill us makes us stronger attitude. 40 months ago, he said today on January the 16th, 2021, I was kidnapped from my home in upstate New York by the Gestapo FBI for my role on January the 6th. And I have remained incarcerated by the Biden regime as a J6 political prisoner without bond and without trial since.

Is that okay? Obviously, no, right? Constitution, you have a speedy trial. You have prohibition against excessive punishment. Not giving somebody a trial, keeping them in solitary confinement for 40 months, that's excessive punishment. That's denial of a speedy trial right there.

End of story. He says, today, after nearly 40 days in a sensory deprivation chamber, he said it was horrific solitary confinement. He says, I've finally been released back into the general population where I can stretch my legs, can do Bible studies, and not starve every night. I beat the fabricated institutional charges against me, he said in all uppercase. These last 40 months have been undeniably difficult, but they have been an epic journey of God's potent grace and his ability to give enduring strength through the name of Jesus, overshadowing the most insane third world treatment of American citizens since Japanese internment camps during World War II. The spiritual significance of the number 40 is seen over and over again in God's living word.

Noah spent 40 days in the ark. Moses led the Jewish people for 40 days through the desert until they finally reached the promised land, Eretz Israel. Jesus fasted for 40 days that the spirit descended upon him and appeared to thousands in Israel victorious after resurrection for 40 days. Make no mistake, America, your soul felt prayers are shifting the atmosphere. He says the battle is far from over. But today, after 40 months, we prophesy the victory in Jesus's name. Well, we'll see what happens because see that the problem is is that the it writes the Gateway pundit we need to vote to Trump to end this madness now keep your hope in God keep your hope in Christ. Trump is not that. He is not your hope.

He is a misdirection. If you put your hope in Trump and not in God and not in what you can do at the local level. See, that's the role that Trump serves. He is the decoy. He is the red herring to keep people from actually doing what they need to do. And I understand that we have a uni party in Washington that has pushed all this stuff, and it's going to continue to do it. I know that he's been locked up. He hasn't seen the news. He hasn't seen what's happening. Perhaps he perhaps he's, um, new to politics.

Perhaps that's why he went to January the sixth in the first place. He trusted Trump and trusting Trump got him in jail. Uh, I knew it. I told people, some people listened, others didn't. I've had some people who listened, who have told me that, uh, but it was very clear what was going to happen. It's very clear. What's going to happen if we trust Trump, not just for January the sixth,

but if we trust him for 2024, he is going to be the, um, the, uh, again, the, the decoy that is going to lead us astray. Uh, so very sad to see that happening. On Rockfan, Amos Poole. Good to see you there. Thank you very much. That's very kind. I appreciate that.

CityCard didn't allow me to tip you, but I think we're good for a while. Wanted to ask if the UN and One World Government was something the Nazis got behind. There's a lot of indications that these were old Nazis that put this stuff together at Bilderberg. From the very fact that their first meeting was 10 years to the day after the last Nazi victory in World War II

at the site of the last Nazi victory. That Bilderberg Hotel that they named the group after was right there at that bridge part of operation market garden and guess what the two guys who put it together one german one british peter carrington and um uh what's the bright what's the german guy's name i can't remember but they were the two that put it together. They were, it was Prince Bernhardt from the Netherlands. He was suspected, both of these guys were suspected of having an instrumental role in the fact that the Nazis won.

Being forewarned, many people believed by Prince Bernhardt and by Carrington, who refused to move up the uh, the tanks when it was necessary in the middle of the battle, he sat there and did nothing. So there's two guys were instrumental in the very last victory of the Nazis in world war II and at the very site, 10 years to the day, they create Bilderberg. I believe that you look at Bilderberg, you'd look at world economic forum, Klaus Schwab, it's got Nazi fingerprints all over it.

And they want to do it economically, what they fail to do militarily. On Rockfin, Michelle Obama. Thank you very much for that tip. I appreciate that. I just want to remind people, like the stream, please, and help us get that. And also, we'll be to uh some financial news uh but um uh remember that uh if you go to david knight.gold that'll take you to tony arteman uh there's a look at these uncertain times and things that are happening as i said you you better start focusing on yourself

focusing on your community focus on yourself your relationship with god your relationship with your family your community start to build those things we've got to rebuild america from the bottom up you know it's our government is rotting from the top down stop thinking that you're going to get everything taken care of by putting some billionaire some narcissistic greedy billionaire who has succumbed to the lust of the eye, the lust of the flesh and the pride of life. I mean, it's,

you know, and, and I say this and I, and I do feel sorry for him. When you look at him, uh, these clips that I played last week, people said,

well, you ever, uh, ask, it was Frank Luntz. And then he had a question, you know, same thing was asked a few months later uh by fake jake tapper and um you know i'm a fan you know jake tapper is cnn he's

he's uh it's again it's the game of thrones stuff but jake tapper is not on our side you know and and of course neither is Frank Luntz. He is a real public opinion manipulator. But isn't it interesting that it took a couple of guys like that to ask Trump the penetrating question that he would never be asked in public by any of these pastors that suck up to him? It's like, what? You know, you've got Paula White. You've got Robert Jeffries. these people have mega churches and everything. And to me, you know, do they have absolutely it's just it's just an act of disbelief and an actual total disregard for Trump to use him as Robert Jeffries and Paula

White and so many others, they use him to get fame and fortune themselves. And they have absolutely no concern for his eternal soul. He's going to hell in a handbasket because he doesn't even want to ask for forgiveness because he thinks that he's, Oh yeah, I've done some bad things, you know,

but, um, I, I've done a lot of good things and i just make it right well you know god's not going to be impressed with your payoff of a hooker and i don't know when you've got this you know what what good things do you do to offset that um i don't know uh because there isn't anything, right? In God's economy, he said the wages of sin are death, and that's why Christ died in our stead. That's one of the things that's different about Christianity and other religions, is that there's actually, God actually came to us.

We didn't go to him. He actually made this offer to us and did it himself so that he could be both just and merciful at the same time. Uh, and, uh, he doesn't even want to have anything to do with it. Doesn't feel like he needs it, which is just one of the saddest things I've seen, you know, as much as I dislike Trump and you know, I really dislike him and how he's harmed people. He is a mass murder. But when you understand what is involved in hell, it makes you sorry. Even for a mass murder like Donald Trump, it really does.

Um, and it would be faithlessness to not feel that way. Well, one more article here that a little bit lighter, um, before we take a break, uh, for the longest time, pull this up, Travis and people need to, I think everybody knows the, the kind of these funny wigs that, that people at the woke scalp article that's there. Um, there you go right there. There's a bright's picture of it all of these barristers there with their wigs on and now we have a person who is saying that it is culturally insensitive to people with african hair and it's not just that he's got he's not just that he's a

black man i mean you know they've got a lot of black guys who wear their hair short or whatever. Um, I would imagine these guys, uh, all these barristers here, they wear their hair pretty short. I mean, if they had like, um, you know, I had hair like Fabio or something. They look pretty ridiculous on these, uh, and these wigs, of course, I, you might say they look ridiculous anyway, but it is a long tradition. And what he has decided is that he wants to have this change for his benefit, that it is culturally insensitive. Well, no, it's not.

It's their culture. It's their culture since the 16 hundreds for 400 years, they've been doing this type of thing at least. And, um, he's the one who is culturally insensitive. Um, and, um, so they want to scrap the requirement for barristers to wear traditional wigs and claims that they discriminate against lawyers with Afro Caribbean hair. The guy has got a large Afro. It's what it says. He has a large Afro hairstyle.

Well, you know, he chose his hairstyle. And if that wig is on the top, I imagine it does look ridiculous. So you might want to try to fit in. But no, see, that's the attitude of migrants. We have to conform to them. We have 400 years of tradition or they do. You've got to conform it to me because I've got to I want to wear my hair a particular way. So all of you will

have to adjust what you wear that's absurd um culturally insensitive actually he's culturally misappropriating uh something i think uh but um the wigs should certainly go there isn't any place in a modern society for barristers to be wearing 17th century fashion he said and there's other archaic dress code items that he wants to have scrapped as well. Maybe we can have everybody there at the British court. Maybe they could all dress like John Fetterman in his early days there before he recovered from his stroke. And they could all just wear sloppy shorts.

But again, the key is this guy is flipping his wig wigging out because he wants everybody to adapt to him 400 years of tradition just gone and it's bigger than just this one guy in this fight this is why there's a massive great replacement it's's why you have the leftists doing all this stuff. Everything must, all tradition, all statues, all names, names of forts, names of schools, statues, cultural traditions, they all must be erased. We're at the point now where they're trying to take everything down. And that's why this is important. Otherwise, who cares about this?

I mean, it is kind of, it is a strange tradition, but it is a tradition. It is a culture. And this is about just leveling the culture, erasing all cultural distinctions everywhere. So we can have this one monolithic gray culture everywhere. I've always found the English court systems be a very the very least very amusing when Karen I went and spent a good deal of time in 1980 when we got married and then we went back again in 1984 both times we we wanted to go to Old Bailey, which is a central criminal court, to watch a trial because of all this stuff, right? Oh, that'd be interesting.

And so we queued up and we waited to get into Old Bailey, and it was a very interesting case. And it was an international espionage case and all this other kind of stuff and we got into it like in the middle and i thought you know that's an interesting that'd be an interesting way to begin a movie you know have a narrative where you kind of jump into it at the trial stage and then kind of backfill the story because that's what we were trying to do was try to backfill the story and just as we're starting to put some pieces together, the guy who on the, who was on the witness stand and they call it a stand because you'd stand,

you know, it's that anyway, um, he, um, uh, he said something about CIA and Malta and immediately they jumped up and said,

stop, you know, we, we gotta have this by and they go up to the bench and talk up there. And the judge says, all right, everybody out. And, you know, we're going to have to talk about this, but we can't do it in front of the public. And so they emptied the courtroom and had a very small number of people that were there because it was the CIA and they were at Malta. I don't know what it was.

I don't know if it's a Falcon or what it was in Malta. I don't know. It left us scratching our heads. And I was like, I want to come back tomorrow and see what's going on and see if we can piece some of this together because it was really interesting. But you line up to go into these different cases and you have absolutely no guarantee that you're going to get back into that same courtroom

again they just you know put people at random in the different courtrooms every day so you could spend a lot of time and queue up there and not get back to that trial you go to something completely different so we dropped it at that point on rock fan andromeda one thank you very much for the tip and on rumble uh mulan lab six, six, one of the few places we can get the truth. Thank you, David. God bless. And thank you for the tip.

I appreciate that. We're going to talk about, uh, we, we picked up, um, uh, I'll give you an overview as to where we are, uh, financially. Thank you for all the tips. Uh, people are leaving and, uh, talk a little bit about some of the things that we picked up in the mailbox. And we will be right back in just a little bit. Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show.

The Common Man They created Common Core to dumb down our children. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

TheDavidKnightShow.com Well, I want to thank some of the people who have sent us contributions by mail for May. And Jim M., thank you very much. Ben and Cindy B., thank you. David and Joan F., thank you very much from Canada. Thank you. That was very generous. I appreciate that. Incredibly generous.

They've been very long and strong supporters of ours, and they doubled down this month. John and Mary Lou B, thank you very much. Stephanie K, John W, David and Anne-Marie N. Margaret Mary T. Tim S. Also, thank you. That's very generous. And he wrote a very nice letter.

And let me just read a little bit of it here because he asked, he had a comment and a question. And he said, the main reason I listen is your commitment to Christ. Well, thank you. He says, but as you get buried in all of this slop of the world and you look into the abyss, what are you doing to feed yourself? Please take time to renew yourself in Christ. Well, I have to say I do more with that than I do to physically take care of myself and renew myself physically. But thank you for the reminder. That is important. And that is important, but thank you for the reminder that is

important. And that is important for all of us to understand what that is. And many times we can get caught up in this and not pay attention to ourselves. That's the big trap I see over and over again from a lot of pastors. Oh, I'm doing great stuff here. And this is really important. They neglect their family. They neglect other things like that. And then it comes back to get them. So that is, that is key. I'm aware of it. Um, and, uh, I do a better job of that side of it than I do the physical side. However, I have had, and I'll talk about it tomorrow. I have had some people, uh, send me some, uh, health thing, health things, and, um, they have been beneficial and I've been able to get better metrics of things that we're measuring and, um, uh, and not using the pharmaceutical stuff, stop the

pharmaceutical stuff and things are better. So, uh, just want to thank people who have sent that, uh, Aaron W. Thank you. Uh, MPS and MJS and Knoxville, close by. Stacy P. I also sent a card. And it's like, God bless you with the same peace, hope, and love that you bring to the lives of others. This sums it up for me, she said. Stacy, thank you very much.

I appreciate that. And I don't want to, you know, that's the other thing, too. When I look at this and I get angry about the things that are done and the injustices and the crimes that are done, I don't want to get so angry and, and dark that I leave other people that way as well. And finally, Ryan F. Thank you. All of you appreciate that so much.

Um, um, okay. They found, uh, Iran's president dead after a helicopter crash on Sunday. Oh, yeah, it was missing for quite some time. They said it was foggy weather, but, you know, we lie, we cheat, we steal, we assassinate, we do coups. We have classes on that, as Pompeo said. But it just keeps going, doesn't it? You know, we keep escalating things. Perhaps it was an accident.

Yeah. Right. Um, but, uh, uh, we will talk about that, but I want to talk first about the birds and the bees that I mentioned at the beginning of the program, uh, because, uh, it, both what is happening with the bees at one uh beekeepers place in in new zealand and of course manuka honey if you ever looked at it manuka honey is highly valued and prized because of um you know they'll have different types of honey uh based on what the bees are consuming a type of that you know based on you can get local honey that's going to help you to fight your allergies to pollen and things like that.

And, uh, Manuka honey has a lot of medicinal purposes and it is a real premium honey that is sold globally. And this guy, uh, in New Zealand, there was not mainstream media hasn't really talked about this. It's really only on social media but he explains what happened as the government came on to his bee farm and just told them they had to burn the bees and there's no compensation for it either we would like people to know there's been messages online that you have to destroy clinical a and B heights. In my 35 years experience we have always done this. We have always destroyed any high with clinical A and B and have done

really well. We have a great outfit. We are an organic beekeepers. I have great start. The videos you're watching on being burnt is about our boxes that were Tēnā koe koe te reo te reo te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te whare i te wh They decided to burn everything. They didn't mark the two boxes that they tested and we would have been happy to eliminate those boxes. But the reality is even those boxes were too low to infect a beehive and that is not the scientific way you do it. All our boxes are from pellets, wrapped and then have traceability because we're organic. You could, if they wanted to, they could bring into New Zealand and allow New Zealand an organic vaccine that just treats the queen, and then all the bees are AFB-free

and they wouldn't have this disease. Well, as you heard him, they destroyed 10,000 boxes because they ran a test and they found in two boxes, two boxes. They ran six tests and two boxes. They found spores. Now, no bees were sick. No bees were infected. And they only found this in two boxes but they destroyed 10 000 this is

the way they're going to destroy our food supply this is the way they're going to establish uh you know you control our food control our water you control us it's just that simple and as we get closer and closer to the fourth turning and the the you know the great reset and all the rest of this stuff they're getting um they're they're moving to these larger uh tactics that are going to allow them to shut everything down and this is exactly what they're doing with bird flu and cattle what they did with these bees i got another picture here. Now the overlay here that says live bees burned alive, that's not true, but whoever put that over that, I couldn't find the original. They didn't have that on it. That was pushed around. They were not burned live, but there he is looking at it, the guy you just saw. Had to put those out there and had to light it on fire himself,

or he would go to jail. That's the amazing thing about all this. You will own nothing. They will own everything. You will not be able to grow your own food. They will tell you what they can do. And they'll do it on the basis of, well, we've got something that has a potential to get something sick. This is like pre-crime, folks. This is pre-pandemic. This is pre-disease.

This is pre-illness. It's like pre-pandemic this is pre-disease this is pre-illness it's like pre-crime and of course you know you uh you don't lock people up before a crime is committed thinking that it's going to happen but that's the way they're running this disease pandemic stuff it's being run like minority report pre-crime a new zealand beekeeper two million dollars out of pocket after being ordered to destroy thousands of hives by authorities who found traces of american foul brood disease no they didn't find they spound pores spores rather these spores can be there for quite some time they don't necessarily infect the bees um the director of stephen brown you just heard says he faced criminal charges and prosecution if he did not destroy his hives even though the

disease itself was not detected this is what uh excuse me i had to sneeze this is what, excuse me, I had to sneeze. This is what the New Zealand Herald said. The New Zealand Herald points out, even though the disease was not detected, this is, the spores are, you know, something that may or may not, it could be there for decades. And it may or may not get bees sick.

But he said, even with that, he said, everything is individually labeled. Didn't have to destroy everything. Could have just taken what was there. I would have happily done that, he said. They ran six tests. Two of them came back having AFB spores. They did not find any clinical disease there. I'm just absolutely flabbergasted.

You just have to comply with them or you end up in prison. And there is no compensation available to the beekeepers in this situation. You just have to destroy your inventory. I'm not going to pay you for it. And this is just unbelievable. You have no way out of it, he said said whether they're right or they're wrong they will prosecute you immediately he believes the sport levels were well below the infecting level does this sound familiar oh we got a pcr test here oh really yeah you've multiplied it by um you know one magnified it by 1.1 trillion times. There's not enough there to get anybody sick.

But you say it's a positive test. This lie, this is a PCR tool to rule the world. That's how they're going to run it. And I don't know if this is done with a PCR test or not, but it's this whole idea that if we find some microscopic trace of something that could lead to something, even though nothing and no one is sick, kill everything, destroy everything. This is really dangerous.

We've got to stop this. This is a new procedure for them as well. They're coming up with things, as I said, they're closing in in on the end of the fourth turning and they've got to accelerate things. They're coming up with these bogus excuses. And because we have not pushed back hard enough on the PCR test and all that nonsense, they're going to keep running this in various forms, the same playbook so uh the north american foulbrood management agency is a quasi-government agency that they put together for this and they said they will not that the new zealand herald said so what was the spore count well i'm not telling you what you tell? Oh, it is commercially sensitive, they said. It's in their interest not to tell you what it is.

If they were to tell people what it was, people, are you kidding me? You destroyed $2 million worth of his stuff there because of that? That tiny trace amount? How in the world could you justify something like that? You couldn't. And so what do they do? They just clam up and they don't talk uh and they will not give you the data it's just like these people who were trying to shut down the world over climate issues not going to show you the data nope can't see it can't see it she wants people to understand that spores alone can spread the disease. It doesn't have to go from bee to bee, she said.

They are highly resistant. They can survive in nature for over 30 years. And for over 30 years, they may not affect or infect any bees whatsoever. But because we found two of them, we've've got to um destroy 10 000 boxes uh it can be quite confronting in that way but i do want to assure people that while it is a quite destructive method it has to be done to protect our sector she said her sector their sector of the economy i don't know but you know absolutely unrepentant about all of that as they have always been about all of this stuff uh don't really care no absolutely no sympathy for what their your blunt force trauma methods did whether they work or not. No concern as to the damage that they do.

No concern about trying to mitigate the damage. This is a raw power play, folks. So the beekeeper is concerned those regulating the disease do not have sufficient training. She said, well, many of the inspectors are beekeepers themselves. Well, what are the other ones? Are they trained? The management agency does not enjoy destroying beekeepers' livelihoods, she said.

We'll have to take her word on it. I'm not so sure if they enjoy it or not. You know, going back to the pandemic, it seemed like Jabsinda Arden took a great deal of pleasure in destroying people's lives. Let me just play that for you, what she used to do. So you basically said this is going to be like, it's almost like, you probably don't see it like this, the two different classes of people, if you're vaccinated or if you're unvaccinated, you have all these rights. If you are vaccinated.

That is what it is. So, yep. Yep. Yeah, she enjoys it too. We're hoping not to have to do that, I guess, when we still feel like we could maintain elimination across the whole country. I guess that has now changed because... I think it was less because necessarily of the elimination determining that and more because we, of course, maintained...

And actually, we have managed very high vaccination rates, generally, without the use of certificates but actually what it's become clear to me is that they're not just a tool to drive up vaccines they're a tool for confidence people who have been vaccinated will want to know that they're around other vaccinated people they want to know that they're in a safe environment it is a way that we can give confidence to those who are going back into hospitality it's a confidence game and so that is something that i think we should offer to people who have been vaccinated that confidence that we're doing everything we can to keep them safe

and that they can come back out and start enjoying those things safely have you ever seen anyone as giddy with power, as callous to the harm that she does to other people, as Jabsinda Arden? I mean, maybe Disney should think about her as an evil queen. If they really wanted to do something. She's out there with her poison apples and poison injections and stuff. Isn't that amazing? And I can imagine that that's probably the same attitude as this woman who's running this B agency and burning stuff left and right.

What has to be done? I take no joy in it. Oh, you don't? You don't take joy in it like Jab Senda did. And so there is another organization besides the one that was given governmental powers to jail and to destroy this is another organization that has been put together by the beekeepers to push back against this quasi-governmental organization always that way right it's like a cdc or something it's called the new zealand beekeeping incorporated it represents a lot of different

beekeepers across the country its president said the test had only been developed in recent years and argued that it was not what beekeepers signed up for in the country's pest management plan. But again, they're unrepentant. You know, we got cases here. We got cases. We got boxes, boxes of cases. Now, two boxes, test positive test positive well destroy 10 000 if we don't take this destruction method then we run the risk of affecting other hives of other beekeepers and the problem will just proliferate yeah we got spores here we got cases here destroy it yeah, that's, this is in a metaphor, what they did to everyone during the Trump

administration and continued on through the Biden administration. Brown, the beekeeper, beekeeper claims that he spent $50,000 a year fighting AFB, that disease, and that he followed protocol when his hives became infected. Again, 10,000 boxes were were two million dollars i only found two of them there was no compensation thousands of the boxes were never tested but were instead burnt on the basis that they were quote potentially unquote contaminated potentially this is why i say it's pre-crime it's pre-disease it's pre-disease. It's pre-pandemic. It's I do whatever I want, and that's their flimsy justification. We don't have cases.

We don't have anybody sick. And we're seeing this all over the place, aren't we, with bird flu. They keep testing everything in the world. Well, I think, you know, if I magnify with a PCR test, I think I see a little bit. Yes, yes, I do. I do. I see a little bit of degraded viral DNA that we're looking for here or whatever. Not DNA, but I see degraded components of this.

Oh, okay. So now we're going to kill the entire herd or the entire flock or whatever. He said, it's just like they're ripping your soul out. A good part of these boxes are brand new boxes. They'd never, ever been on a beehive and there's no disease in them. So you have food production being politicized, folks. They go after this guy. They go after Amos Miller, who's doing organic farming on his own, right?

You've got to be a part of their system. You've got to be in the club. You've got to be part of big agra, or they want to destroy you. That's why they're going after raw milk so hard with the bird flu scare. This is our chance to shut it down, right? We found it in some milk. Why were you looking at milk? Why didn't you look in the eggs, right? If it's bird flu, if it's you looking at milk why didn't you look in the

eggs right if it's bird flu if it's coming from chickens why didn't you look in the eggs no no they looked in the milk they found a few places said well it's not going to get anybody sick but yeah we got to shut down raw milk dingle denied the agency had a lot of power um and this is somebody else in the agency besides the other person who was in charge of it it was industry funded but they had certain powers given to it by government including the ability to enter property without permission without permission uh no warrant right and demand that gear be burned within seven days or you go to jail uh so asked whether beekeepers had any way to contest an order to destroy gear he said i don't know never been in that situation before

nobody's ever pushed back well they know that they would vindictively destroy their entire farm. Because he's got a large operation. Even though they did $2 million worth of damage, even though they destroyed 10,000 boxes, he has a very large operation. He has 150 tons of Manuka honey annually they sell. He has 3,000 different hivesives i don't know how that corresponds to boxes uh but um again they said it's not just about one beekeeper it's about all beekeepers

right it's like your hive protects others it truly is a hive mindset isn't it yeah uh yeah wear the mask uh because your mask doesn't protect you. It protects other people. Get the MMR vaccine because, you know, you're getting an MMR vaccine doesn't actually protect you against measles, they say. Oh, and then same thing with the COVID stuff. Well, Judy Mikovics had an interesting statement about this. But before we get to that, though, Dr. Peter McCullough said the state of Michigan just declared a bird flu emergency over this weekend. They are now PCR testing animals to create an artificial crisis.

That's exactly what this is. Here's what he has to say. Is this bird flu just another election coming scam? What is it? Bird flu now, we have incredible evidence that it's gain of function research, again, being done in U.S. laboratories this time. The Athens, Georgia U.S. Poultry Research Center, the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

We can identify even this gain-of-function strain. I mean, CDC Director Redfield, the former director, came on national TV and said it's gain-of-function research. You know, so this has now become very clear. clear it's perfectly timed ahead of this who meeting to try to you know bring in the u.s and you know everyone else under this global treaty control it's poised right ahead against ahead of the elections state of michigan just declared a bird flu emergency what they are doing mass PCR testing of animals creating this artificial crisis and then mass culling or destruction of poultry they're going to create a food shortage in reality bird flu can be treated in humans with modern-day treatment and early detection we shouldn't lose a single life with bird flu. Probably only the animal

handlers are at risk anyway. And the bird flu scare, which is disease X, the Global Vaccine Alliance says it is disease X, that this is going to create food insecurity as the driver of fear going into the election cycle. Yeah, and i want to um i largely agree with what he has to say it really is about ginning up fear it's about creating an artificial crisis there's not anything that's real there as a matter of fact if you look at um uh you know they did not destroy all of the bees at that bee farm i don't know they you know those were empty boxes i don't think they had the bees there so did the bees leave those bee farm. I don't know. They, you know, those were empty boxes. I don't think they had the bees there. So did the bees leave those boxes?

Are they going to go merge in with other hives or do they die? What, what happens if they weren't burned alive? I don't know. I don't know anything about the bees, but wouldn't you think that, um, you know, they, they didn't find any sick bees. They found some spores. And so if, um, they didn't burn the bees alive or if the bees aren't going to die if they can't get back into their particular box now if they're just hung out to dry and they

starve to death essentially or something um then what sense does that make anyway right if you got the the bees from these supposedly potentially infected boxes, even though they didn't find any disease anywhere. If you don't kill the bees, are they going to merge in somewhere else? But what he had to say, I take issue with a couple of things he had to say. It is about creating another scare, another pandemic. And I think that we don't want to feed that by saying that it's gain of function. Folks, nobody's getting sick with this. Talk about gain of function. And I see that a lot now from the conservative press. And of course, nobody wants to talk about stopping the gain of

function and nobody's doing anything to stop it. The Republicans will talk about it. They'll talk about how Fauci did it, but they won't talk about stopping it. It was stopped in 2014 during the Obama administration because of the expose of Alison Young at USA Today, talking about all the different accidents they had of releasing diseased animals into the wild out of these labs and stuff. They said, let's stop it. And they stopped it in 2014, except that Fauci and Collins continued to do it.

They did it at the University of North Carolina. They did it in China. They did it in several other places, and then just boldly put out the research that they had in defiance of the Congress, of the Obama administration, of the obama administration telling them to stop it and then in 2017 the trump administration said let's go with it let's you know take off the moratorium and so the question is why is the uni party not doing anything about this no republicans no democrats are talking about shutting down the gain of

function except when you hear the conservative media they always want to talk about gain of function. And all that does is legitimize the fear and the panic about a pandemic that is being put out there by the mainstream media. Folks, there is no gain of function that we have to worry about with this stuff. That's a game that they're playing. And the conservative media in many cases is doing their work for them. They're not going to shut down this gain of function stuff. Yes, they could release diseased animals, but there is no gain of function involved here. It has not jumped from one species to another. It has not jumped to man. They keep talking about,

oh, we got a case. We got a case. We got case in texas you got a guy who had pink eye he's working at a dairy did he not wash his hands and rub his eyes because that could give him pink eye it's conjunctivitis you don't die from conjunctivitis i as i said before i had it many times when i was a very young child in florida when we didn't have air conditioning in the schools and stuff it was it's not a fatal condition it's not something that is serious and it is if that's all you get from bird flu then why don't they shut up about this stuff but instead they say well we've had a human case we had a human case oh i don't think you did but uh there's two things about this two objectives number one they want central control of food and so they can control you they want to make it scarce and they want to centrally control it number two they want to vaccinate the population through the food that's what they need to be talking about forget

about all this stuff about gain of function everything you know trump is not your guy anyway he's the one who re-legalized gain of function in his administration and fauci the guy the elf that he had running uh operation warp speed and francis collins they defied congress and the government and continued to spend funds on that you know congress said no you will not spend any funds on gain of function research they did it anyway. And so you have to understand that this whole herd mentality lie that they've been telling everybody, you got to get vaccinated to protect other people. Nobody believes that anymore.

Nobody wants any of their concocted vaccines anymore. And so they're going to have to, instead of trying this herd immunity thing, instead of trying to trick you with a herd mentality, they're going to go to the literal herds and they're going to vaccinate them with mRNA or whatever and make a lot of money and then vaccinate you through the food supply. Can't people see this? Stop talking about gain of function there is no gain of function but there is a vaccine they want to vaccinate all the cows with so they can contaminate all of the meat and that's one of the reasons why they're coming after the organic farmers and why they want to shut everything the only person who understands that by the way is thomas massey i think the other ones understand as well he's the only one who's honest enough to get

to the source he puts up a thing to shut down the federal reserve he puts up a thing to the primack to support farmers like amos miller or anybody who has any livestock that they want to slaughter on their own farm or their own home or something like that for food you should be able to do that but that's what's truly behind this so yeah we have to understand that this is he's right and he understands mccullough understands that this is artificial artificial pandemic they're trying to panic everybody but if you understand that shut up about the gain of function stuff it's's not real. And you're panicking people. And a lot of people in the conservative press are doing that. And we need to push back against that.

Don't let them panic you. Oh, it's disease X. WHO says so. It's not. It's not a pandemic. Nobody is sick. Not even that one Texas worker. And then you got Judy Mikovic, who makes a very important point. I disagree with some of

the stuff that she has to say, but she makes a very important point about how she said, you know, prior to 2019, now they're all about mRNA vaccines for everything, right? But what did they do before that, in 2019 and earlier? What did they do for flu vaccine? They would make the flu vaccines by incubating them in chicken eggs. Oh, isn't that interesting? Now we're talking about bird flu after you created all your flu vaccines in chicken eggs? What an interesting combination. And, of course, I talked about that many times, how they would, and that's one of the things I talked about with Operation Warp Speed.

Typically, what we do with these vaccines is we put them in, you know, we gin up something in chicken eggs. And it takes a while for it to develop. And then we do this and that. But we want to short circuit all of that. We want your body to manufacture the antigens and that's what the mrna is about the mrna goes in and reprograms your body to manufacture the antigens so we don't have to manufacture them in chicken eggs what could possibly go wrong so i called them genetic code injections from the very beginning. But I didn't talk about the,

I think this is an important connection to make that Judy Mikovics does. The fact that they've always done these vaccines through the eggs. There she is. Just to be clear, every flu shot before 2019 was made in what? Chicken eggs. It isn't always was infection by injection. Just going back to bird flu, come on, folks. How dumb, really, are we? Where did we make all our flu vaccines

until the universal synthetic vaccine that unwittingly President Trump was conned into signing by Fauci and company in September of 2021 before our book, Plague of Corruption, came out. And of course, the movie, which had already been written. So, folks, just to be clear, every flu shot before 2019 was made in what chicken eggs so do you think you're going to get a bird coronavirus a flu virus check back to my friend dr cherry tenpenny and see that they use specific pathogen free eggs oh which specific pathogens don't they look for? Oh, coronaviruses from birds. Yeah, that's exactly right.

That's a good point. That's a good point. Even though I disagree with her, Trump did not unwittingly do it. He was not conned into doing it. Come on, folks. If he's that stupid, he pushed it for another three years. He just recently pulled back against it, but now we can pretend that he never knew and was never on board the entire time.

Really? Really? Uh, and of course, you know, this is being put out by her. She's she's, um, you know, hitting up, uh, clay, uh, Clark who's with a reawakened, uh, Trump bandwagon, uh, tour that's out there i understand that's their business model but the truth actually matters trump was the con trump was the one who who was there because the left wants to do whatever the government tells them they're clamoring for safety they can't get enough safety they don't want liberty at all the right would

typically look at this and say, wait a minute, you're promising me some safety, but you want to take some of my liberty? No, not going to do it. So they put Trump in and they tell everybody he's an anti-globalist. And then he marches in lockstep with every globalist government doing the same things at exactly the same time. And now as part of this again we have robert redfield who was the cdc director for trump i've lost track of how many times he's been on it's been at least three different times uh saying you know we we got a pandemic here we got a panic about all of this stuff uh here's what he has to say uh to get the um uh the the uh the trump cult to believe and gain a function again pushing

all the panic buttons about gain of function robert redfield trump's cdc uh liar part of the operation warp speed team i'm obviously most worried about bird flu yeah right now that takes five amino acid change uh for it to be effectively infecting humans. That's a pretty heavy species barrier. But this virus is already now in 26 mammal species, as you saw most recently, cattle. But in the laboratory, I could make it highly infectious for humans in months because it's been published, the five amino acids that I need to change. And so i don't think that research should be done that's the real threat that's the real biosecurity threat

that these university labs are doing these by uh by see the fear campaign now we got this thing it's really easy to make this stuff but hey i can't stop them they're just going to do it and everybody's like oh no it's kind of it's inevitable we're all going to die from something some gain of function thing the fact you and we can't stop it no no he's lying to you and then we have mitt romney well first of all you would have expected that uh the lessons that we learned with covid uh as well as the lessons on the baby food shortage would have led our various government agencies to say we need to be able to collect better data look at trends in data identify threats before they become severe yeah you're the threat that hasn't happened to the you and people like you we identified you mit called bird flu uh we have the department of agriculture that's doing some work

we have the cdc which is doing some work and other agencies as well but the Department of Agriculture that's doing some work. We have the CDC, which is doing some work, and other agencies as well. But the coordination of their data gathering has not been as extensive as I'd like to see it. They haven't been able to communicate yet to the American people that they're fully on top of this terrible. You know what I think we need? You know, we've got the CDC. They're doing some wonderful stuff. And we've got the FDA, and they're doing some wonderful stuff. And the USDA.

Doesn't't sound like 9-11 i think we need to have you know the fbi was doing its stuff and the ci they were all so wonderful in the nsa they were so wonderful but you know we still had 9-11 and so we need to create a new powerful bureaucracy we call it homeland security they're going to come up with something like that i predict uh just to make, always want to centralize stuff, always want to make it more and more of a bureaucracy. And they will run this stuff pre-crime. And as I've said from the very beginning,

you have to understand these pandemics, especially what happened in 2020 with Trump, that was the second shoe to drop from 9-11. You know, the dark winter, two months before nine 11, the anthrax attack one week after the model state health emergency powers acts sent out to the States two months after that, then Trump declares an emergency to give money to the States to, uh, to do what they gave themselves the power to do over the pre preceding 20 years as a CNI, a CIA and it's ilk practiced

this very thing for 20 years. Lock everybody down, come up with a novel vaccine, make that the condition to getting out of your lock down again, a jail term, a jail term, going to jail the population and show them who's boss yeah we learned a lesson didn't we uh i hope that um when i look at this i looked up the vaccination rates by the way tennessee was like a second or third least vaccinated of the states and um so i looked up the vaccination rates, and you know if their numbers are true, because they do vary quite a bit from these different ones,

so I don't know who's telling you the truth. I don't know if they're deliberately lying or they just don't know, but we look at it, and it's about a third of the country did not get vaccinated, and especially the second shot. There's a big difference between the number of people who took the first shot. They're saying, well, you know, maybe about 80% of the people took the first shot, maybe about 65% took the second shot, or in some cases it's, you know, the low 50s.

But in every state, they say more than 50% of the people got the second shot. But still, you're looking at a massive resistance even if you only say 25% or 30% you're looking at like 50 60 million people out there like you like me who said no way no way am I going to comply with this absolutely will not comply with us now this is what trump is out there saying now and i retweeted that clip that i played last week and i said uh yeah when trump was out there telling everybody um you know this this last week well you know what they're going to do they're going to try to lock everybody down like what happened in 2020 and you know

mess with the election everything it's like you did all of that stuff he says we just got to tell him we won't comply and i retweeted and i said yeah that's what i said to trump in 2020 i will not comply and i said he's rigging the elections when he did vote by mail and all the rest of the stuff the folks understand that what they're doing now to collapse our food supply to destroy independent farms is they're going to be doing this pre-crime pre-pandemic approach a fake pandemic all based on numbers and cases and pcr tests and we found spores but no sick bees, but let's kill 10,000 boxes when we found spores in two of them, no sick bees. So we have bird flu hitting New York City. This was curated and put up on the Drudge Report, but no such thing.

No such thing. Humans are told to stay alert after a new pandemic warning well they said that they found six birds who tested positive for avian influenza including a red-tailed hawk three canadian geese and a peregrine falcon well that must have been pretty fast to catch that guy uh fastest animal in the world a peregrine falcon right travis uh and a we just had a joke about that this last uh last week um he was able to go to uh dollywood with some friends and um they were bringing out um uh wild birds um predator birds like falcons and stuff like that and um predatory birds and uh so they said what is the fastest

what is the fastest and he spoiled the uh punch line for him he said it was a bergen falcon and they found a chicken as well a chicken now i'm i'm not surprised that they have wild birds that are flying over new york city but they found a chicken in new york city that's what i'm i'm amazed at not not that they they blew a positive pcr test you can do that with anything i'm just surprised they found a chicken in new york city uh outside of kfc when you go to nyc you're not going to find any chickens on the street volunteers in a community science project they call it the virus hunters yeah this is like you know the little hitler youth or the stasi bring me the bird and i'll find the disease yeah they collected feces from just under 2 000 birds between 2022 and 2023. Oh, wait a minute.

Is this recent? It's not clear from this article that is pushing this fake headline whether this is recent or not. Samples from six birds tested positive. And then they list these birds again. And so was that, did they find six samples from 2,000 birds that tested positive? Were these birds sick and dead? No, no. It's kind of like the Monty Python skit.

This bird is not dead. You don't have to bang it on the table. But it said that they collected 2,000 species between 2022 and 2023, various urban parks and everything. Samples from six birds tested positive. So is this something from 2023? And is this six samples from 2,000 bird feces that tested positive without any birds dying or being sick but because of that

you should not be able to get any meat or dairy in new york city you see therefore she's made of wood because you know science again it's like monty python well roy scientists say that while the presence of bird flu and big apple poses a low risk to humans and pets, because they'd be laughed out of New York if they said otherwise, they should be laughed out for this. You found six out of 2,000 positive? And that two years ago? Two years ago? Show me your dead pigeon, okay?

Is it new that people have to be concerned about getting diseases from birds? You know, you don't just go out and pick up feathers that you find there. And if you see a little kid that does, like, stop it, don't touch, that's dirty. Is that something that's new? Do we have to have virus hunters? A team of virus hunters with maybe their little merit badges and stuff from eric adams to go out and do this though the latest strains of highly pathogenic avian influenza oh that sounds impressive doesn't it pathogenic avian influenza bird flu i've already have been in the city for at least two years this is another

thing that makes me think this is old news yeah you know two years ago we had 2 000 people go out they found six samples and they treated to these uh six birds they think really and now this is headline news you're dredging this stuff up you see how artificial this pandemic is don't buy any of it don't buy it even from people who otherwise give you good information like dr mccullough this is not gain of function that you have to worry about this is gain of bolshevik to put it lightly it's not uh bird excrement it's bovine excrement that they're selling you here uh so it's already been in the city for at least two years and there's been no human cases but we had a farm worker in texas fell ill from bird flu he got pink eye and then the very next sentence uh the bird flu can be quite fatal no no not at all

it got pink eye and to say they don't say fatal they say quite fatal oh they killed him dead you know i mean it can be quite fatal this tells you that they're juicing the story if nothing else does it's just amazing it could be quite fatal pink eye I don't think a single person has ever died from pink eye I could be wrong but I don't think so and I said so we need more eyes on the ground well if you do that you're probably going to get pink eye um keep your eye off the ground wash your hands when you're dealing with cattle and maybe you won't get pink eye. And certainly not bird flu. Because that's not anything you really have to worry about.

But this is everywhere. Fox News. This is what they were running about the human who got the bird flu. ...pathogen jumping from bird to cow to human. Texas health officials issuing a statewide alert after the first... Pink eye. ...case of human infection with bird flu that came from a dairy farm. Pink eye.

FDA confirms the avian influenza virus has infected cattle in Texas and elsewhere. After wild captured media, Fox News farms there and may have contaminated the feed. Fox News, your your sponsor showing I can see your sponsor sticking out from underneath your your sponsor's showing i i can see your sponsor uh sticking out from underneath your your coattail uh then we've got mainstream media uh they do their little hit piece good evening since the first case of very serious influenza good evening flu was transmitted from a cow to a human. Officials have warned the public to expect more human cases ahead. The H5N1 strain of bird flu was discovered recently to have infected. Yeah, you get the idea. And then there's the WHO.

This virus now evolves and develops the ability to infect humans and then critically the ability to go from human to human transmission. This guy is a chief scientist at WHO who's been lying to us about all this stuff for years. 500 cases so far of humans. The mortality rate is extraordinarily high. To me, this is a major... Can't survive that conjunctivitis. The current outbreak, for want of a better word, in America amongst cows is really concerning as well and also talks to this issue of transmission we have

to understand in those cows every bit of that is a lie every bit of that is a lie call these people out i am so sick and tired of these liars america's dairy cow replacement inventory collapses to a two decade low that's what they're coming after folks. They don't make any secret about it. As I played it last week, Eric Adams years ago. Yeah, we want it. We're starting to monitor all the meat and dairy that people are consuming.

They're not monitoring at that point in time. They weren't monitoring meat and dairy for some bird flu. They were monitoring you. Are you eating it? Cause you can't, we want to make sure that we cut down on your meat and dairy. And we're not going to allow that to be put in the schools because we have come together with this C40 thing.

You know what that was? C40. Is that for cities? Well, that's what they said. It said it was for 40 cities. Actually, the C stands for conspiracy. It was a conspiracy of 40 high-level politicians like Sadiq Khan in London and Bloomberg in New York.

C40 was a conspiracy of 40 elitists that has now grown to a conspiracy of over 100 elitists at 100 cities in the United States, or worldwide, I should say. And their conspiracy was to monitor your consumption and make sure you're not going to get any of that stuff that's what this is always about and so now another part of the media campaign that has ramped up coming from the fda is to call people idiots and fools who drink raw milk uh just as we're having this stuff come out saying, well, you know, they were ivermectin, right? Stop it.

You people are idiots. This is for horses. And now they're saying raw milk is for cows. Stop consuming it. As one person pointed out, whenever the FDA says to not do something, it's kind of a Streisand effect. Maybe we need to change that. Instead of it being the Streisand effect, we need to call it the FDA effect.

Because they have lied to us and told us exactly the opposite on so many things. That you want to do exactly the opposite of what they they do you know just like jim cramer at cnn when he tells you to buy or sell you do exactly the opposite you want to do what nancy pelosi's husband does he's the one who knows how to invest well it's the same thing with this other stuff pasteurization a process in which milk is rapidly heated it's the same thing with this other stuff. Pasteurization, a process in which milk is rapidly heated. It's cooked, designed to kill bacteria and potential pathogens in the dairy. The process, however, destroys and deactivates a number of important enzymes, amino acids, vitamins, minerals, and other healthy bacteria, writes Wine Press.

The Weston A. Price Foundation has a number of articles explaining the negatives of this process. And again, if you go to this article on Wine Press, they have a link to the Weston A. Price Foundation. Explaining the negatives of this process and the pros of raw dairy. Raw milk, which humans have consumed for millennia. In situations that were far more unsanitary than we live in today by the way uh raw milk and dairy are still illegal to sell at grocery stores in most of the united states and they want it completely illegal this is why the cdc and the fda are now demonizing raw milk like they demonized ivermectin and it's just as absurd if not more so

because there's you know we only had about 60 or 70 years worth of history with ivermectin right to know what the safety profile of it was they had a problem because it was being used off label in other words they had not specifically run any test but we had a lot of information, uh, that was done right away. Uh, when, you know, it was brought in and all of a sudden, you know, nobody is, uh, everybody's getting well, uh, from the ivermectin. And we saw this at the national level. I mean, we're talking about millions of people and a massive experiment, but they wouldn't acknowledge it. And they said, well, because we have not approved it for that specific thing, it's unapproved.

Well, it's just off-label use, and doctors have always used drugs off-label. It's gone through its safety profiles. It's been used for condition X. Now we'd like to test it and see if it's of any value with condition Y. That's always been allowed by the FDA. They've never tried to take people's licenses, whether they're doctors or pharmacists, for doing something like that. They've never punished people. They've never mocked people. They might have mockery of themselves, actually.

Mark McAfee, owner of Raw Farm USA in Fresno, California, says, quote, people are seeking raw milk like crazy. Anything the FDA tells our customers to do, they do the opposite. Uh, but then you've got these news outlets like Gizmodo and this has been promoted endless. I've seen this Gizmodo article picked up and run through, but it's not the only one. Gizmodo says raw milk sales skyrocket as idiots believe drinking bird flu will give them immunity. Nobody's drinking bird flu.

Talk about a dishonest. What shills these people are. That's as stupid as that ivermectin ad tweet by the FDA. That's horse medication. Stop it, y'all. This is even more ridiculous from gizmodo matt novak the author of that article lambasted those who drink raw milk matt you need to get a new job maybe the cia will you know if you work for them they might pay you a little bit more if

you work for them directly than gizmodo he said please don't drink raw milk at any time especially not now despite claims that there are nutritional benefits to raw milk that's simply not true according to the fda which we don't believe and you should not believe as a matter of fact you know you lose some of the positive benefits of um the pasteurization stuff but with raw milk and of course the dairy that we go to it is pasteurized so they can sell it but it is not homogenized that's the thing that's really negative so you miss the raw milk by pasteurizing it you lose some of the positive benefits of it but by not having it homogenized first of all there's a lot more cream in it it's amazing to look at this dairy's milk compared to the milk that you get in the grocery store which is bleach

white their milk is cream colored because they haven't skimmed it all off or a large part of it and and you don't get the homogenization, which makes it difficult. It has some negative health benefits, a lot of negative health benefits. Anyway, he says, the lone claim that holds up is that raw milk tastes better. Yes, it does. Something that's obviously a matter of taste, and that's a really stupid reason to get very, very sick. Well, nobody's. You're the stupid one you're the idiot you're pretending that everybody's getting sick you say in your headline that people are drinking

bird flu from having cow's milk you're an absolute idiot this is like this this guy matt novak of gizmodo he's a preview of what people say is going to happen to artificial intelligence as it starts consuming its own product. Right. It's like mad cow disease or Yakov Kreutzfeld disease or something. You start to lose your mind. That's what this guy's doing. He's consuming too much mainstream media, and he can't think anymore.

He can't think anymore. There are a number of mainstream reports published this week so far that have guided drinking raw milk, and here's some of the titles. I like this from Wine Press. Raw Milk Enthusiast Demand Milk In milk infected with bird flu. Another one. Raw milk sales are surging because people think drinking bird flu makes them immune. And these are tech sites. Here's the independent in the UK.

Bird flu and health warnings won't stop raw milk drinkers getting their fix. It's like it's a drug or something, right? Getting their fix. No, it's just what humanity has consumed for thousands of years. Since time began, essentially. And done it, as I said, under much, much less sanitary conditions than we have today. Raw milk, says PBS. under much, much less sanitary conditions than we have today. Raw milk, says PBS, raw milk sales spike despite the CDC's warning of risks.

I would say because, because. Stat News, a pharmaceutical publication. My rendezvous with the raw milk black market. Black market. They can at least call it a white market quick easy and unchecked by the fda oh we need more regulation don't we yeah absolutely stunning says fortune magazine food safety experts amazed as raw milk sales surge and budding bird flu crisis amid budding bird flu crisis yeah because the two are not connected at all and because there is no crisis except in the media you have to read and watch the media to think that there's a pandemic just like back in 2020 raw milk is growing in popularity but is it safe to drink yeah it is

again he was uh not mark mcafee who had the raw milk outlet was not quoted in full context by the ap uh his full quote was i've had several customers say that whatever the fda tells them to do that they will do the opposite they understand that this is part of an ongoing this is part that they wouldn't put in the ap they understand this is part of an ongoing smear campaign against the industry and they are instead going to listen to their farmer they run out of attacks and this bird flu scare is only the newest version it is not contagious to humans at all he said the science shows that there are no genetic markers indicating that it is not contagious to humans at all he said the science shows that there are no genetic markers indicating that it has the capacity to skip to humans none and in spite

of all this stuff about a human again it is conjunctivitis it's not bird flu is um if that's the worst that happens with it we don't have to worry about it cdc however is launching a national dashboard as i pointed out on friday so it can keep you constantly updated with cases cases as they continue to expand their testing of waste water and to monitor it in other ways. Yeah. They will never stop. Like one of the key similarities between it and climate change is a total Bolshevik science that's out there where they, um, uh, make models and projections. And they don't show you the data just like, oh, well, we're not going to tell you what we tested with these birds that we demanded, the bees that we demanded that he burned, not going to give you that information.

They're not going to tell you, uh, they're going to lie to you about the temperature readings are going to lie to you about how they took the temperature readings. They're going to lie to you about the trends and all the rest of the stuff. Just like they lie to you about all the cases with the PCR stuff. It's all based on lies. And they blinded you with science as the song goes but it's no science at all they want you to believe that it is science when it isn't we'll be right back Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show we're going to um we're going to talk about the

artificial intelligence stuff here coming up uh but before we do i want to talk a little bit about abortion a couple of amazing stories in here as we talk about science on rock fan scott helmer thank you very much for the tip says the entire plandemic was built on the fraud of using the PCR test. That's never been exposed to the masses, even though so many have tried. So they will put the same fraud again and again. Now a bird flu. What will it take to wake the sheeple up? We're all chained to their ignorance.

Well, part of it is to get people to wake up to the fact that trump was not conned trump was not gaslighted he was the conner of the manga people were the connies uh he was the one who was pushing the lies out there to people and they can't be trusted uh but yeah the the pcr test it's just amazing they just keep getting away with it and again um we had kerry mullis died from respiratory disease a couple of months before they kicked this whole thing off back in 2019 uh in um san diego university california uh this was sent to me by roy thanks for sending this to me i'd not seen it from the college fix. And when I saw this, I thought, well, this is an old article at first. Planned Parenthood was doing aborted baby parts and selling them, right?

And this is coming out of the Center for Medical Progress David Daleiden trial that is in California. And as a due discovery, they had already found this once before. And that particular one involved the University of Pittsburgh. And they were acting on behalf of and with money from the National Institute of Health. And Fauci was ordering baby parts. And Planned Parenthood was killing the babies at the ages of development and so forth they needed and of course they the babies are selected and born alive so they can get these baby parts now this is true of all this because they're not going if they want to use the organs for something right first of all they're not going to rip the baby apart which is one of the

ways that they abort them the next one is they're not going to burn them alive or use chemicals to destroy them because they've got to preserve the organs. And so just as they do in China, they extract these organs from living people like the Chinese do it again from prisoners and that type of thing. Well, they do it to babies at Planned Parenthood. And so that one that I first saw this, I thought, oh, is this the same stuff? No, that was University of Pittsburgh. And that was the NIH, Fauci and Francis Collins. This one is slightly different as well, because this is not simply about the money. There is some

apparently quid pro quo being involved here, but this is about Planned planned parenthood being able to get intellectual property rights from the experiments that are there university california at san diego and planned parenthood operated an exchange partnership involving aborted baby body parts and scientific research according to newly released documents obtained by a pro-life watchdog organization center for medical progress believes the evidence uncovered through its open records request may be incriminating david delighten told the college fixes organization is calling for a federal investigation here's the problem david delighten and center for medical progress is being persecuted i don't say prosecuted but persecuted for exposing the truth about murder for hire baby parts this is something that already been brought up in a congressional

testimony that's why they did the investigation and they got these people monologuing about how they wanted to buy lamborghinis and other stuff like that but then the state of california rather than investigating planned parenthood for murder for hire, investigated and charged David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress. They wanted to shoot the messenger. And the people who ran it was the state California state attorney general, Lala Harris. And then when she got promoted to Senate, she turned it over to Javier Becerra. Now Lala is vice president and Javier Becerra is the head of HHS, which Fauci and Collins NIH is part of that.

So don't expect that there's going to be a federal investigation they do have an inspector general with the hhs but i don't think given the policies and the politics and all the rest of the stuff there's going to be an investigation however it is important for us to get this information out um so they did it uh the university of california san diego uh aborted babies in exchange for ownership of the university's patents and intellectual property it was actually um um the um planned parenthood was entire it was involved in that to get the intellectual property. And so, again, you know, the other one was to feed the experiments for Fauci at the University of Pittsburgh so that they could create humanized mice. This is because they just want intellectual property rights

for whatever it is that they discover. The partnership appears to violate federal law, which prohibits the transfer of aborted human fetal tissue for valuable consideration. One document that they found in this is titled Biological Materials Transfer Agreement. And it is a contract between Planned Parenthood of San Diego and UC San Diego, University of California, San Diego. It was signed in 2009 and it was updated in 2014. Parenthood of San Diego and UC San Diego, University of California, San Diego. It was signed in 2009 and it was updated in 2014. And it gives the university access to fetal and placental tissue, which are proprietary materials of PPSD.

That's Planned Parenthood San Diego. In exchange, the contract states that Planned Parenthood shall retain all right, title, and interest in and to the material, including but not limited to all right, title, and interest in patents and patent applications and other intellectual property rights relating to the material. You see, this could be very valuable when you consider that the moral and ethical objections that a lot of people had to the vaccines were that they were tested and developed using aborted baby cells. And those can go in forever. They just keep renewing these cells. And so Planned Parenthood, by getting the intellectual property rights, could be getting a revenue stream that is eternal as well.

That's why they want to do this. David Daleiden said he believes Planned Parenthood has made millions of dollars from their partnership with UC San Diego, but his organization is still investigating. He said in the years since the proprietary fetuses contract was signed, that's what they call it, proprietary fetuses. Think about that. We own these babies. We own these babies' bodies and the parts that we extract from them. Since that contract was signed, one major UCSD, University of California, San Diego, donor,

extended $10 million in grant support to Planned Parenthood. See, here's where the payoff is, the quid pro quo. According to another public records document obtained by Center for Medical Progress, UC San Diego donated $10,000 to a Planned Parenthood fundraising event in 2021. So they just seem to do it. You know, $10,001, a $10 million grant to a Planned Parenthood fundraising event in 2021. So they just seem to do it. You know, 10,001, a $10 million grant and another, uh,

the, uh, their latest investigation found a similar situation to what they uncovered previously with the university of Pittsburgh. That's why I said, I saw this and it's like, wait, is this old news?

No, they're different. Two different cases. How many of them are there? HHS, uh, has an office of inspector general. They're investigating the Pennsylvania University's fetal tissue research projects.

I imagine they'll just look the other way. But anyway, approval of these activities and the NIH funded the university's transfer of fetuses from Planned Parenthood in both cases. It's funded by Fauci and by Francis Collins. Same people out there doing, you know, taking diseases and trying to magnify them, getting animals infected and releasing them. But they won't do anything to stop gain-of-function.

And again, you should not let that panic you. In spite of all their incompetence and malice, there's not been a pandemic. Not in 2020 and certainly not today. We're now calling for HHS, Office of Inspector General, to investigate Planned Parenthood-supplied fetal tissue bank at Pitt to be expanded to include what is happening in San Diego. And we're calling for increased congressional oversight. Well, you know, maybe Jim Jordan can hold some hearings and do nothing about it.

And of course, Machiavelli and Mike Johnson is not going to do anything because, again, he wants to run as far away from the abortion issue as he possibly can. But, you know, the interesting thing is the so-called um self-professing christian machiavellian mike if he cared at all about abortion he could take this and run with it couldn't he right in the same way that you know we had this uh person running for congress last year i recovered the remains of these five babies from an all-term abortion center yeah so you know they could they could show this in their congressional campaigns just like she did biden and my own but they choose not to they choose not to show you the truth about what the

aborted babies look like the fact that it is murder you see that commercial you know it's murder they have chosen not to show you the truth about what our own government is doing. They will continue to fund the NIH. They'll continue to fund these humanized mice experiments, this transhumanism. They'll continue to fund the murder for hire. They will bury it. And at the same time, they'll tell tell everybody don't talk about abortion it'll cause us to lose the election this could be a win if these people had any principles but of course they don't and we know that here's somebody that does though joan andrews bell got a standing ovation this 76 year old woman veteran pro-life activist was sentenced to another 27 months in jail she's

already been in jail for eight or nine months and um so um as she was there at the sentencing hearing uh she sang she's catholic she sang ave maria and the people that were there gave her a standing ovation she said I will not compromise. I will not pay a fine. I will not say I'm sorry for what I did. She is hanging tough in all of this. She absolutely refuses. She said her husband told LifeSite News via email that she refused to make any compromise that might suggest that there was

regret on her part. In court, Jones said to the judge in conscience, I cannot pay any fine and I cannot accept probation as it violates my conscience. Wow. Can you imagine if there was just a little bit of that in Mike Johnson or any of these other people, these phony people in Congress? Just disgusting to compare them to her. What vile, craven, addicted to power money and who knows what else these people in Congress are. RFK Jr. has now walked back his support for legal abortion up to the moment of birth. Now he says, I support a viability cutoff.

Who cares? He's already shown what he is. Just like all the rest, just like Trump, just like Biden, they have absolutely no principles. They're flip-flopping, no spine, no principles about anything. He'll tell you this today. What will he do tomorrow? Who knows?

Because the man has no integrity. And that's true whether he's talking about his fantasies about climate change or whether he's talking about what he wants to do about free speech. He doesn't have any credibility with me whatsoever. No more just like Trump, just like Biden. In federal court, parents in Maryland school district cannot opt to take their kindergarten through fifth grade students out of an LGBTQ curriculum. Can you imagine that? No, you've got to put the very young ones in because that's when we have the most effect

on them. And I had a listener send me a letter, and she's in Toronto, got her child in a Catholic school, and they're pushing this stuff. Because, you know, hey, you've got different jurisdictions. You've got different people running it. You know, the Catholic Church is not monolithic. A lot of it is like the the pope and uh so you know she said i can't homeschool and i understand uh but i would just say you know if you can't homeschool there are other schools there are other church schools even that you can go to where you won't necessarily get this stuff you need to look and see there

might be some other church schools that will not do this stuff to your kids but in a federal court in Maryland they upheld the Maryland school district policy which will not allow parents to opt out for their young K-5 children. They can't opt out of a gaslighting propaganda curriculum to lie to them about gender identity and sexuality. Why are you talking to kindergarten through fifth grade kids about gender and sexuality? That right there ought to raise concerns about pedophiles. And this has been brought,

this is being run by the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty, but they are representing parents who are Muslim, who are Jewish, and who are Christian. Nobody likes this stuff. Everybody understands what these schools are doing. I mean, this is sexual gaslighting. These people are pedophiles. Why do we turn our children and our institutions over to pedophiles?

And look at how pervasive it is. It's a school district. It's a federal court. All of them, you know, from the school to the courts to the federal courts. They argue that the district's refusal to allow these Muslim, Jewish, and Christian parents argued that the district's refusal to allow their young children to opt out of reading of, here we go, LGBTQQIAAP2S+. How ridiculous this is. How ridiculous this is.

How ridiculous this is. We just need to laugh at this nonsense. These are the themed books. They will not allow them to opt out. And they said the participation in this curriculum violated their right to raise their children in accordance with their faith. Well, if you're going to put your kids in the government school, they're not going to be raised according to your faith.

And they're not going to be raised according to how your faith defines identity and sexuality. The parents also argued that the material is not age-appropriate for such young students. Absolutely. K through five. The book titles that are integrated into this curriculum, K through five, include The Pride Puppy. This is disgusting.

I mean, you know, they have it at such a juvenile level to sexualize these kids with a pride puppy. Uncle Bobby's Wedding. Born Ready. level to sexualize these kids with a pride puppy uncle bobby's wedding born ready oh that sounds like a pedophile book right yeah born ready born ready uh ready and consent to to sex and so the true story of a boy named penelope the book the pride puppy which is the sole test expressly approved for use in pre-kindergarten invited the three and four year old audience to look for items such as a drag king leather a lip ring a drag queen and underwear okay well you know this is, this is the Brave New Schools, the Sodom and Gomorrah schools that are there. And then the New York Times.

Some conservative Christians are stepping away from the gender wars. It's not a gender war, it's a spiritual war. They want you to think that it's a gender war. war and they have a family there um that's um uh mother and father and their son who is now dressing up as a woman and and this is a a typical way that the establishment press will present their stories you see this all the time for the washington post and the new york times and npr and everything they began this by talking about this family, the husband and wife, the mom and dad. And I, well, you know, we were really strong Christians and everything. And then our son, you know, we found out wants to be a female.

And then they leave it at that. And then they give you all their backstory about what their chosen experts have to say about it. And then at the very end, they come back and you know that, especially from looking at the headline, you know, these Christians are going to be stepping away from their faith in order to embrace this and to, as they try to put it, show unconditional love. It's not unconditional love. It's not unconditional love. It's disbelief. Disbelief about what God says in his word, how he describes us as human beings. Disbelief in God's word about what he says about reward, punishment, and sin.

Disbelief that God will hold people accountable to what he says to them. Disbelief that rebellion will hold people accountable to what he says to them, disbelief that rebellion will be punished. Andrew and Debbie James are evangelical Christians born in England. The couple moved to Denver years ago and raised their kids there. Mr. James has profound religious conversion experience early in parenthood and their large non-denominational church quickly became the focus of their lives. They used to say that if the doors were open, they were there. We always joked that we had this perfect little scenario, Mrs. James said. We had our boy, then we had our girl, and they were two years apart,

and they were just perfect. They were strict parents, says the New York Times. Too strict, they say, in hindsight, with a goal to, quote, shield them from absolutely everything. And let me just say this. You know, one of the things that the North Carolina Homeschooling Association called itself was the greenhouse report. Why did they do that?

We weren't raising vegetables. We were raising kids. And, you know, I remember all the Christians who did not support our homeschooling. And they'd say, you need to put them out in the world to salt and light. I said, that time's coming. That time's coming. First, they need to be protected and nurtured

in a safe environment. And then, you know, just like a plant that you raise in the greenhouse, you're going to put that out, and it's going to have to survive or die in the real world, and you never know what's going to happen, do you? There comes a time that it comes out of that, but you want to, in its tender and young time, you want to shield it from those types of things. I said, so you're telling me that if you're going to have a war,

that you're going to send your kindergarten kids to go fight that war, is that right? Is that what you're going to do? So spiritual war, this is a lot more dangerous and a lot more complex than any physical war fighting other people is going to be. And you're going to send your kids out there. You're going to have your kid go up against the person at the front of the class that's got all this power and authority and lords it over them. You're going to have your kid stand up against the peer pressure of all the people in that class. No, you're not. That kid's not going to be able to stand that. Anyway, when the couple's older child was 19, living at home as a college student.

So here's a kid kept in a shielded environment. They send them off to college, and even though they're still living at home, the college is the thing that can corrupt him. Mrs. James got a call from the pharmacy informing her that her child's prescription for estradiol or estrogen was ready. In a panic, she searched the teenager's room, confronting, and they put it, her. It's a him. Girls don't need to get estrogen.

I mean, typically, there might be some defect or something. But, you know, it's a guy. But they use her. And it went badly. They initially refused to use their daughter's chosen name, Lilia. And Mrs. James could barely be in the same room with her when she was wearing a skirt. It's a guy. It's a son.

Then a pastor at the church encouraged them to kick their daughter out of their home. She said she recalled thinking, this must be what we're supposed to do. This must be biblical advice. And so that's where they leave the thing. And you know, they're going to quote a lot of experts and they kind of come back and tell you

that they abandoned their faith, which is exactly what they do but in the interim they have uh they try to take uh besides having psychologists who say well this is just totally natural now and it's something we've never seen before but it's happening to everybody now as even bill mars says uh so why is it that um all the kids in california are in the wrong bodies, but not the ones in Iowa or something, right? Yeah, we know why. But they take a comical stab at theology.

And let me just say, you know, it's a difficult thing to know what to do with that. But the one thing that you don't do is to encourage and accept people and their sin and you have to tell them the truth you don't want to live by lies you want to live by God's Word and so you want to be honest with them you don't want to tell them I it doesn't matter it doesn't really matter what God says that's why this is the tip of the spear in the spiritual war but But they had this to say, right? They said, well, the theological foundation of Christian opposition to the concept of transgender identities

announces itself in the very first chapter of Genesis. So God created mankind in his own image. In the image of God, he created them. Male and female, he created them. And they think they've got an out for that you think they do i mean you can say the bible just doesn't apply and you can say as this family does well god just doesn't have any rule in our life we're not going to follow god anymore we're going to follow our own whims and so you can reject this you can take it or leave it but it doesn't really leave any wiggle room. You know, God created two genders.

Gender, two sexes, two genders, whatever. All the rest of these were created by the New York Times and Harvard and all the rest of these people, some psychologists. Christian advocates for transgender people point out that here's how they try to spin this. God created them male and female. Well, the Bible depicts a surprising range of gender diversity without apparent judgment. No, it doesn't. But listen to what they say.

Jacob, a patriarch of the nation of Israel, is described as a smooth young man who stays in the family's tent and is favored by God over his more traditionally masculine brother, the hunter esau uh and um that is absolutely doesn't have anything to do with it at all if you read the story there you know that what they're talking about smooth versus esau one of them had a lot of hair and the other

one wasn't very hairy and he even uses that to uh to deceive an elderly parent and get a blessing because he puts animal skin on himself. And it's like, I'm Esau. It's like, oh, really? You don't sound like Esau. But it's about the hair, how much hair he's got. He said, one of them is hairy, the other one's not. It doesn't have anything to do with the gender. There's nowhere in the story that it's ever implied that Jacob wasob was anything other than a man nowhere they made that out of and then immediately after that in the same paragraph

even it says jesus says in the gospel of matthew that some men are born eunuchs i don't recall that at all but that doesn't have anything to do with jacob and and that's not what he's talking about um i don't even recall that passenger i didn't that's not what he's talking about um i don't even recall that passenger i didn't bother to try to find that because i i i don't know i've i think i've probably read the gospel of matthew more than this person at new york times i could be wrong but i'm kind of thinking that they made this up no uh it's the marxist universities that created the other genders besides male and female but then this is the saddest part of the story. They said it was a fight between loving their child unconditionally

or believing and following what their religion was telling them. You know, any sin can be forgiven. But like I said about Trump, not if you don't think you need forgiveness. You sin can be forgiven. But like I said about Trump, not if you don't think you need forgiveness, you won't be forgiven. And why do you call Jesus Lord, Lord, but you don't do what he says? And as a matter of fact, if you look at Paul's letter to the Corinthians, he was talking about sexual sin. There was a different kind of sexual sin. It was a man who had shacked up with his mother-in-law and they said yeah you know all of our sins are forgiven we can do whatever we want he said no no no that kind of um and he said that kind of sexual perversion is not even known amongst

the the gentiles in this area he says what what are you doing with that um You know, there were a lot more, I guess, you know, Rome was not as debauched as our society is now. And he said, no, you send him out. And hopefully that will wake him up. You know, in the Old Testament it says, the wounds of a friend are a blessing, that iron sharpens iron we're there the whole purpose of people in a church is hold each other accountable accountable to what accountable to

what god says uh so these people decide they will uh they they don't believe they don't believe that god has the power to change people they don't believe that God has the power to change people. They don't believe that sin can be forgiven. They don't believe that they need to, in love, save their son from hell. They just walk away. This is why I say, you know, this is where the church is right now. And this whole idea that we don't want to hurt anybody's feelings, that's not loving.

As I said during the pandemic, people said, if you love your neighbor, you'll go get the vaccine. I said, no, loving my neighbor is telling them not to get the vaccine. Loving your son is telling them not to wear a dress and, you know, fall into these traps that have been laid for them. And here's the sentence. This is how they end the article. The mother says, for so long, we were good little soldiers, and now we live in the gray. Folks, there is no gray. There is no middle ground.

Not with God. It's darkness or life. It's darkness or light. There is no gray area. There is no lukewarm Christians. You're either hot or cold. That is one of the biggest lies from Satan. Oh, I just uh somewhere in the middle now i'm living in the gray uh really strange but then one last thing here you know when we talk about the deception of this stuff i don't spend a lot of time talking about the sports aspect of the transgender stuff because quite frankly i think that's the least of all of this stuff i mean they're they're grooming pedophile wise these kids in kindergarten. I know the stuff about the showers and things like that,

but if somebody gets beaten in a sports thing, that's not fair. But that's not the key thing. Fox News made that the key thing with Bruce Jinder so that they could criticize it without really getting involved in the core issue. That's not the core issue. It's a secondary, tertiary, or even less of an issue. There still is an issue. They had a transgender high school runner in Oregon who was booed after winning the

girls' state title. Everybody knows what's going on now. And when I look at these, what this reminds me of is how long and how strong the lies were. Anything you can do, we can do better. You know, the Virginia Slims cigarettes and everything. Girls and women can get lung cancer just like men get your Virginia Slims and everything. But that was always, you know, their whole thing was, uh, men were repressive and all the rest of this stuff.

We were lied to for decades that there was a parody between the different sexes. We had the Billie Jean King and the Bobby Riggs, and he was appropriately named Riggs because that's what he did. And it wasn't even a parody. Anyway, he was the guy that was in his forties who was retired and she was in her prime. But before that, he had beaten a tennis player

and I think he rigged this one for the money. And then after his tennis match, you had Jimmy Connors, skunk current champion, female champion. It's not even close. And so people are booing this because it's a form of cheating and they understand that. But again, I look at it and what I see is how long they ran the lies. And eventually people wake up and eventually they understand what the lies are

about. So when we come back, we're going to talk about artificial intelligence because it is a lie yes it can do some things and we'll talk about why it can do some pretty amazing things and yet still be a lie we'll be right back Terima kasih telah menonton! Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show on rumble stealth patriot thank you for the tip he writes, I'm not worried about bird flu. I'm worried about the government tyranny. Exactly right. I died from monkeypox, but I got over that. Misplaced fear is such an evil and corrosive thread. It is most destructive and enslaving. That's absolutely true. I mean, why is it that we see so many times, you know, fear not in the Bible over and over and over again? Fear not.

If we understand our position in this world, we don't have to fear that. On Rumble, Speedtro, thank you for, Speedtro626, thank you for the tip. Appreciate that. And he writes, monsters run the world. That's right. And our task is to not become the monsters that we fight. That's the key thing. And we're here.

We're here to fight. We're here to fight these monsters. I think the most important thing that we can do is to speak and speak the truth. And that's why it's important to take a look at artificial intelligence. It is going to be a massive propaganda tool, a massive con game, a massive surveillance game. And we need to understand what it is as well as we can. And I think I found a good explanation for it. That is, I think it'll open up some of this to you. But before we get to that, Futurism, during a huge demo, Google's AI provides idiotic advice about photography that would, of course, destroy film.

Is this why all their pictures of Scottish people are black? You know, you wind up with just a black piece of film. You overexpose it um and um it's not the first time that it's given bad advice and again this is gemini this is the same one that when they ask it all these questions that made everybody black or asian in places where there are no black or asians historically google is hell-bent on crowding out search results with ai generated advice right futurism which is often flawed sometimes with devastating consequences is hell-bent on crowding out search results with AI-generated advice, writes Futurism, which is often flawed, sometimes with devastating consequences. But don't worry, we'll just call it a hallucination.

It's not a bug. It's not a lie. It's a hallucination, right? This week, during its splashy I.O. conference, the company made yet another blunder. As The Verge reports, the tech company showed off its gemini ai offering suggestions on what to do when the lever on a manual film camera isn't moving all the way except that it made some genuinely horrible suggestions among gemini's dubious things you can try was a highlighted bullet point to open the back door of the camera to gently remove the jammed film oh that, that should work, right?

Expose the whole roll. It's not even the first time that Google has been caught showing its AI giving misleading advice. Last year, Google's chatbot, which was called BARD at the time, said that NASA's James Webb Space Telescope took the first picture of an exoplanet or a planet outside of our solar system which is blatantly false but of course futurism is not going to talk about the all the pictures of the black 17th century scotsman that came up or the asian scotsman or whatever it's just yeah they don't they don't that's the most glaring example and it's the one that everybody can understand

uh i mean you know we talk about the differences between exoplanets or when it was discovered or whatever that's minutia this is blatant stupidity and you know one picture was worth a thousand words but they had thousands of pictures microsoft has deployed a powerful new ai that is completely disconnected from the internet. Why would they do that? Well, because the spy agencies want it that way, right? So the spy agencies created the internet. They created social media.

They know that they want to be off of it. They know what they created. They know what they created the internet for, and they know what they created artificial intelligence for. Weapons. Surve surveillance, disinformation. That's what they're all for. So the idea is to provide U.S. intelligence agencies with a way to analyze top-secret information without running the risk of leaking any of it, because nothing is secure. Nothing is secure nothing is secure uh so their subtitle here is for cia eyes only um so you know when we

when we look at these people they don't trust the the weapons that they have created to not be used against them open ai is mocked for issuing an infringement claim over its logo while it scrapes the entire web to train AI models. In other words, everything that OpenAI does is to violate other people's intellectual property and the copyrights and all the rest of this stuff. And yet on one of these websites, 404 Media Reports, chat GPT creator OpenAI is getting absolutely roasted for allegedly hitting moderators of a chat GPT subreddit with an infringement claim because they put up OpenAI's logo. So they got a subreddit that's about chat GPT and they put the logo up there and they said, take that down. And it's like, are you kidding me? You live by violating intellectual property rights.

You know, I was talking to my son who I've mentioned many times. Daniel Suarez is a kill decision. Very interesting book. And it was written maybe 12, 15 years ago or something. And he told me, he said, I went back. I was listening to this as I was working again. I hadn't listened to it for a number of years. This is a really good book.

And he said, well, what's interesting was the pivot point where things got really dangerous in these weaponized drones and things was when the art, the drones and the AI could look at a, at an image and identify the things that are in there. Like we've shown you this last week with the phone, right? A phone looking at using the, uh, using the camera that's on your phone and, uh, saying, you know, what you're drawing or reading your handwriting or looking at the contents of your room and making judgments about it. Oh, it looks to me. Oh, take a look at the room that I've got here. Oh, it looks to me like you're doing a video. Yeah. What's the video about? It's about you. Oh, me? It's about me. You know, that type of thing.

And he said, that was the pivot point in Daniel Suarez's book, Kill Decision, where the drones got really dangerous, what he'd put in was not nearly as sophisticated as what they're putting on consumer phones. Now we're in a, we're in a tight spot now, as I say, on one film, uh, the,

uh, the new AI teaches humanity how to be better liars, and it will never replace humans. This is from Brian Shulhavi, Health Impact News. A very good article. He's got a couple of different sources here. People who are very knowledgeable about the underlying technology, which I admit I know nothing about large language models or how they operate. And so he said, it's been a year and a half now since the first large language model AI app was introduced to the public in November 2022. That was a chat GPT open AI.

And of course, Microsoft was involved with it as well. He said, but after 18 months now, the number one problem for these large language model AI programs remains the fact that they still lie and make stuff up when asked questions too difficult for them to answer. And I thought about that. I thought, just like their creators. Whether you're talking about the politicians or DARPA or the CIA or the tech companies, these politicians, these spooks, these technocrats, they just lie, especially if they don't know the answer to something. They just lie. But when the AI does it now, they call it hallucination.

Of course, these other guys do as well. You know, they're talking and promoting hallucinogenic drugs and mushrooms and all the rest of this stuff. So I guess that's why they came up with the term hallucinate. But, you know, the hallucination part of it is one of the reasons why art is what it does the best. If you stop and think about it, everybody was saying, well, it's going to it's going to be very well. Artificial intelligence and computers. It's going to be very rational and it's going to be very calculating, all this kind of stuff. No, instead it's kind of like, woo, you know, hallucinating, making stuff up. That's why it does such a good job with artwork.

You know, it takes a little bit of stuff that's factual and then it throws in some crazy stuff as well, which can be difficult to deal with. Sometimes you're doing artwork, you gotta do successive iterations of it. Uh, but he says, um, you know, it is, um, even though it's rapidly transforming fields like communication, education, creative expression, other things yet amidst all of this brilliance lies a hidden vulnerability. Hallucination. And by the way, it's going to even get worse as, you know,

we just talked about how it scrapes information off of the internet and, and uses it. It's all based on copying and ignoring copyrights and all the rest of this stuff. And once it starts consuming its own stuff that it's putting out there all the time it will once it starts cannibalizing and feeding on its output they've already shown that it will start to get really stupid you know it's like somebody getting yakov kreutzfeld disease mad cow disease type of thing and you know i think that'll even happen with the

artwork as well it'll happen with the music it's creating you know you can create generic types of music now but you know maybe in the past you would get from a service or something but um you know i think it's gonna we're gonna start seeing that happen anyway these hallucinations might seem harmless at first glance a sprinkle of fiction and a poem, a mistranslated phrase. But the consequences can be real with misleading information, biased outputs, and even eroded trust in technology. And I'm eagerly anticipating the day that I hope it doesn't require some major tragedy for it to happen. But, you know, we will get to the point at some point, people realize garbage in equals garbage out.

They'll realize these things are not really thinking. And once that Rubicon is crossed, it'll be like people seeing, for years we tried to get people hesitant about vaccines and understand what the issue was with it until Trump came along with his warp speed stuff and now vaccine hesitancy and skepticism has skyrocketed. Similar thing will happen with AI. Let's just hope that it doesn't

create a great deal of harm in the process. A synonym of the word, Brian points out, a synonym of the word, Brian points out, a synonym of the word artificial is fake, not real. And so he says, what we ought to call artificial intelligence

is fake intelligence. We ought to call it FI. Yeah, sci-fi, right? Science, fake intelligence, sci-fi, I guess. Kyle Wiggers, who writes for tech crunch so because models have no real intelligence and are simply predicting words images speech music and other data according to a private schema they sometimes get it wrong very wrong in a recent piece in the wall street journal a source recounts an instance where Microsoft generative AI invented meeting

attendees and implied that conference calls were about subjects that weren't actually discussed on the call. Well, that's not even the worst example. I mean, the worst example is what it's done to people slandering them. It was Matt Taibbi who, um,

the chat GPT just made up a whole bunch of stuff about him and said he lied about this and it was all really negative, slanderous stuff and it started and then kind of continued down

that riff and then started making variations on his own lies, obviously making all the stuff up. And there was, you know, none of it was true, but it was talking about how he'd been caught deceiving people and busted for this and that. I mean,

it's just, and he's not the only one that, you know, you go in and you ask it, um, you know, give me some information about so-and-so and, and it can accuse people of crimes and that type of thing.

Uh, Devin cold away. Also writing for TechCrunch, though, had what I think is the most important part of this, the centerpiece of this. And he really does seem to understand what the issue is. And he said, and how do we explain all these different moving parts to people over coffee or something when they ask me about this? He said, you know, you've got everybody.

One thing about this, you got everybody from philosophers and linguists to engineers and hackers to bartenders and firefighters. They're all now questioning and debating what intelligence really is and what language truly is and whether something like chat GPT possesses intelligence and language. He said, it's the great pretender. He said, AI doesn't know the answer. And it hasn't even learned how to care.

He says, all that matters is that these systems do not distinguish between something that is correct and something that looks correct. And I thought this fits in perfectly in our post-modern world doesn't it i mean a cynicism um of a pilot saying what is truth right well everybody says that now in college if they've been college miseducated uh college graduates of today uh you've got a truth. I've got a truth. The only truth that they have is that there is no truth. Self-contradictory.

And so AI is the perfect reflection of our society, isn't it? Of a postmodern society. That there isn't any truth. Once you understand that the AI considers these things to be more or less interchangeable, in other words, something that is correct versus something that kind of approximates what is correct. He said, everything makes a lot more sense.

He says, I've learned a lot already as some of the smartest people in the space enjoy their moment in the sun. And while from the mouths of comparative babes come fresh new perspectives, but at the same time it's a lot to sort through over a beer or a coffee when somebody says what is all this gpt stuff this is kind of scary how smart it's getting right so where do you start he said do you start with aristotle do you start with a mechanical turk do you start with the perceptron or

do you just go attention is all you need he He said, during one of these chats, I hit on a single approach that I found helps people get why these systems can be both really cool and totally untrustable while subtracting not at all from their usefulness in some domains and the amazing conversations being had around them. I thought I'd share that in case you find the perspective useful when talking about this with other curious, skeptical people who nevertheless don't want to hear about vectors and matrices. So he says, he boiled it down to three high-level things to think about. Number one, these models are created by having them observe relationships between words and sentences and so on in an enormous database of text and then to build their own internal statistical map of how all these millions and millions of words and concepts are associated and correlated. No one has said this is a noun, this is a verb, this is a recipe, this is a rhetorical device, but all these things just show up naturally in patterns of usage. This is one of the reasons why they talk about it.

Large language model. It's one of the reasons why, you know, they're, they're desperate to get more and more data because the more data they have, the more statistically accurate their approximation of the truth is going to be compared to their competitors who don't have as large a language model. Number two, these models are not specifically taught how to answer questions. With large language models, the questions are just a series of words like any other. So it's just looking at your question. It's not answering it. It's just looking at your question and kind of regurgitating its statistical correlation to something else that's out there. Number three, these models have a fundamental expressive quality of confidence in their responses. Here's a simple example he said.

Take a cat, and you're going to do cat recognition with artificial intelligence, meaning that it would go from zero, completely unsure that it's not a cat, to 100, meaning it's absolutely sure that it is a cat. And you can tell it to say, yes, it is a cat. If it's at a confidence level of 85 or 90, whatever produces your preferred response metric. So he says, so given about what we know about how the model works, here's a crucial question. What is it confident about?

It doesn't know what a cat or a question is. It only has a statistical relationship found between the data nodes in a training set. A minor tweak would have the cat detector equally confident that the picture showed a cow or the sky or a still life painting. The model can't be confident in its own quote-unquote knowledge because it has no way of actually evaluating the content of the data that it's been trained on. The AI is expressing how sure it is that its answer appears to be correct to the user. That is why it must be considered to be the world's most comprehensively informed BS or a Bolsheviker, right?

Rather than an authority on any subject, it doesn't even know that it's BSing. You, it has been trained to produce a response that statistically resembles a correct answer. And it will say anything to improve that resemblance The AI doesn't know the answer to a question any question because it doesn't understand the question It doesn't know what questions are it doesn't know anything It's basically doing pattern matching And see this is one of the reasons why there's two things that I think are dangerous about AI really really dangerous

It will one of the reasons why there's two things that I think are dangerous about AI really really dangerous um it will um assume the mantle of authoritative commentary and people will believe it when it's not true when it has a bias that is actually put into it by the people who created it that's a tremendous problem right there The second part of the problem is this pattern matching thing. This is the core of what it does really well. And being able to match patterns and to say, not that this is a cat, but that this is David Knight, whether it sees me walking or sees me from a distance or whatever, but it can identify and match these patterns.

That's exactly what our surveillance government wants, which again, we ought to just call it serve gov. Cause that's what they want you to do. They want you to serve them, uh, on rock fan. Thank you very much, Michelle Obama. Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that again. Um, and so he says it's the same reason that AI can produce a Monet like

painting that isn't a Monet. All that matters is that it has all the characteristics that cause people to identify a piece of artwork as his. So it imitates, right? And of course, it is all about lying. These large language models don't actually create anything new. You see? And that's our disconnect.

We think they're creating stuff. No, they're just rearranging things. And it's not about that. It's about doing the pattern matching. That's why the government loves this so much. And it's going to use this so much for geospatial intelligence, for anticipatory intelligence, for mapping you and your political and religious beliefs. It's going to combine those things together. It's the essence of what they want out of geospatial intelligence. Another way to look at it would be to observe that what it is doing in the real world is making humans better liars. By not accurately representing the core data.

That's Brian saying that. He says, lying and deceiving people sells. While the truth most often does not sell and when the public watches a commercial uh for google's latest phone and he's got that included in there as well and and and that i'll just describe it instead of showing their commercial um you know he he sets the camera up he has to take a delayed picture and he jumps in the air. And then what he does is, um, he, um, takes the picture and he selects himself jumping in the air and he makes it bigger and he makes himself jump higher. He's way up in the air. Uh, that's kind of,

that's not too much of a, in other words, you're doing Photoshop type manipulations right in the phone right away. And, um, then, uh, towards the end of the commercial, he has a group of like four guys and somebody is holding the phone up and they're doing a selfie of the four of them. And one of them is looking off to the side and another one's got a, you know, got his eyes closed or something like that. That, you know, it's kind of a hodgepodge.

And then they show, after it does its magic, you've got all of them looking directly at the camera, and they've all got their mouths open like, like a laugh or a yell or something like that, which none of them had that expression on their face. And so what he says is, you know, this is manipulating pictures. You know, that's one of the key things when you look at photojournalism. They don't want anything that is manipulated.

You can't Photoshop it. You can't do anything to it. You can't adjust the colors or things like that. They want it in its raw, true form, right? And so when you manipulate the pictures like that, you know, you may be doing it for fun maybe you're not really thinking about deceiving anybody but you know it is manipulative and it is false it's not really what the camera cook and so he says uh you know lying and deceiving people

sells he says when you look at that commercial for that google phone he says uh probably most people are going to look at that and say that's great i love that he says in reality what it is is dishonest now that's a small example but he said as i mentioned in a recent article those who are training these large language models are starting to panic because they're starting to run out of data. This brings up another serious flaw, and that is whether or not it's accurate. It's stealing stuff like the article I had at the beginning, you know, where open AI, everybody knows it's stealing stuff. And it's like they have a problem with a subreddit that is using their logo because it's about open AI.

They tell them to cease and desist. And they go, are you kidding me? Yeah, your whole model is based on theft. He says, but the greatest data collection abilities that humans have is nonphysical. It is metaphysical. Now, I thought this was kind of interesting, and it's something that I've not really noticed before, but I'll give you the point that Brian Shulhavi makes here.

I think it is kind of interesting. He said, hundreds of years of Darwinian biological evolution theory has taught most Westerners that our brain is the center of our consciousness, whereas for thousands of years, people traditionally believed that the heart is the center of our consciousness. And that's the way the Bible talks about it. Now, whether or not the heart is actually the physical heart or whatever, that's a different issue. You know, whether that is, you know, the heart of the person, you know, the heart could represent your soul, for example. Because, you know, the vein is just an organ. You know, you're not your body. You're not any part of your physical body. You're not your brain. You're not your heart. You're not any part of your physical body. You're not your brain. You're not your heart. You're not any, you are something else. You're occupying this, uh, this body right now. Uh, so that may be what it is as I look at it, but he makes a different case here. He says,

uh, there's a lot of stories about people who get heart transplants and then find themselves thinking and remembering things that the person who donated their heart experience before they died, even though the recipient of the new heart never knew the donor. And he gives one example of many, uh, Claire Sylvia had strange cravings and dreams. She was in new England. Not only did the heart and lung transplant that the 47 year old woman received save her life,

but it also made her the first person in new England to undergo the process. She told a reporter that when she was asked what she wanted to do first after save her life, but it also made her the first person in New England to undergo the process. She told a reporter that when she was asked what she wanted to do first after the operation, she said that she was, quote, dying for a beer right now. That was strange to her. She'd never enjoyed beer in the slightest before. Over the coming days, she also found that she was experiencing cravings for food that she'd never liked or eaten before, such as green peppers, Snickers, chocolate bars, and strangely, McDonald's chicken McNuggets,

something which she had never had a desire to eat. She also began to experience strange dreams. She would see a thin young man she believed was called Tim. Specifically, she had the words Tim L. in her mind in her dreams. She started searching through local obituaries and found out that Timothy LaMirande was 18 years old when he died in a motorcycle accident and she got his heart.

He had been on his way home from a local McDonald's restaurant. A bag of chicken McNuggets was found in his luggage, in his jacket rather, when doctors removed his clothing in a desperate attempt to save his life. Yeah, Twilight Zone stuff. That's it for today's show.

Thanks for joining us. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now. Yeah, good job. And you want to know something else? You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at the David night show dot com. That's a Web site.