The David Knight Show - Mon Episode #1974: The Great Financial Reckoning: Gold, Bitcoin, and the Collapse of Everything You Know
Episode Date: March 24, 2025Is America 2025 about to become a rerun of a prophetic box office dud? Even George Carlin’s narration could rescue the comedy catastrophe, Americathon, from its own bankruptcy. Will the Trump admi...nistration plan to “put our [natural] assets to work” be any better?The financial system’s on the brink—gold and Bitcoin clash as commercial real estate crumbles, DoorDash hawks subprime burger loans, and Wall Street plots to sell off America’s soul to dodge a $37 trillion debt bomb. Trump’s flirting with treason, eyeing a British Commonwealth reunion just in time for 1776’s 250th bashAI’s storming in, slashing 70% of white-collar jobs, with Swedish robot dogs and Nvidia’s humanoid army set to rule by 2030, watching your every move in a dystopian nightmareTed Kaczynski’s ghost is cackling—his pre-internet prophecies of a jobless, AI-choked world are hitting hard, with even tech gurus and FBI agents whispering, “Uncle Ted was right!”An app called Worldly zaps Babel’s curse, sparking “new Pentecost” hypeUkraine’s luring kids to war with cheeseburger bonuses while Trump pumps a $20 billion fighter jet as swarms of cheap AI drones win the real battles.Disney’s Snow White flops as a socialist “girl boss” mess, mirroring a society celebrating witches and gender picks for newborns.From subprime rib scams to cultural rot, it’s a full-on reckoning—grab your popcorn, because this collapse is blockbuster-sized2:30The Great Financial Reckoning: Gold, Bitcoin, and the Collapse of Everything You Know!The world of money as we know it is teetering on the edge of a seismic upheaval! The whispers are growing louder: the monetary system is primed for a radical restructuring: commercial real estate crumbling under a tsunami of expiring loans, DoorDash peddling subprime hamburger microloans (yes, you read that right!), Doug Burgum, and Wall Street sharks eyeing a fire sale of America’s vast assets to keep the ship afloat. It’s a wild, desperate gambit that smells suspiciously like bankruptcy dressed up as innovation! 1:00:41Trump’s Royal Betrayal: Surrendering America to King Charles’ Commonwealth Conspiracy!Just in time for the 250th anniversary of 1776, Trump like the idea of uniting with the British Commonwealth. Trump’s fans call it trolling, but critics scream treason as he flirts with making America Great Britain again. Is it because NATO and Five Eyes are working out so well for Americans?Why? And what would be the implications for trade, sovereignty, etc.? 1:18:47 Thank you to supporters and emails about AI Big Brother driver monitoring of ambulances, buses, etc and “Just War” 1:38:58AI’s Silent Invasion: Your Job, Your Life, and Your Robot “Agent” Overlords Are ComingGet ready for a spine-chilling wake-up call: Artificial Intelligence isn’t just knocking on the door—it’s kicking it down and taking over everything! From programmers, to lawyers, to doctors, AI’s relentless march is set to obliterate 70% of white-collar jobs. Meanwhile, Swedish robot dogs powered by AI “agents” are learning to hunt goals and Nvidia’s CEO says humanoid robots roaming the streets are less than five years away and ready to replace factory workers for a cool $100K a year. it’s a dystopian nightmare barreling toward 2030, where jobs vanish, robots rule, and the elite watch and analyze your every move 1:55:45Are You TedPilled? Ted Kaczynski’s Terrifying Tech Apocalypse Is HereNow even FBI agents and tech gurus like Ray Kurzweil are nodding, “Uncle Ted was onto something!” His chilling words, scribbled long before the internet took over, predict a world where jobs vanish, AI watches our every twitch, and the masses become “superfluous”—and guess what? It’s happening right now. So what DID he predict? Is “Doomerism” the appropriate response? 2:11:30AI’s Tower of Babel: Is a Fake Pentecost “Miracle” Something We Should Embrace?An AI app called—get this—Worldly — isn’t just a translation tool; it’s a high-tech reversal of the Tower of Babel’s curse, uniting 60 languages in a flash. Some hail it as a “new Pentecost” or a “miracle”. How SHOULD we view it? 2:18:29Chee-Burgers to Die For: How Many Cheeseburgers Would It Take for YOU to Enlist in Zelensky’s Futile War? Get ready for a jaw-dropping plunge into absurdity that’ll make your stomach churn! Ukraine’s desperate military is dangling a bonus broken down into McDonald’s cheeseburgers—to trick 18-to-24-year-olds into the crosshairs of the frontline. As the USA continues to finance the war on a credit card, DoorDash is offering “micro loans” to defer payment of your cheeseburger. Bundle that risky fast food credit into a “subprime prime rib” package, and poof—risk vanishes, just like the 2008 mortgage scam And, Trump announces a $20 BILLION fighter, doubling down on expensive, complex, products of failing military contractor when wars will be won with asymmetrical, low cost AI swarms 2:33:39 Thank you to Zelle supporters 2:34:54Disney’s Snow Job: Woke Disaster Unleashes Evil’s ReignRe-invented as a “girl boss”, this socialist “disjointed pile of clichés,” is just part of what’s wrong with Hollywood and society. New Jersey hospitals push parents to pick their newborns’ gender and witches revel in a cultural comeback, and the movies have gone full villain-worship, a stark warning of a culture drowning in spiritual rotIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTFor 10% off supplements and books, go to RNCstore.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
When you want a bet on sports, played on a field or ice or courts,
Bet Rivers is the place.
Over, under, money, lines, same game, polys, it's all fine.
You put a smile on your face.
Bet on the sports you love with Bet Rivers Sportsbook.
Take a chance!
Must be 19 plus, available in Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
please contact Connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak
to an advisor free of charge. In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 24th of March,
year of our Lord 2025.
Well, today we're going to begin
with what is shaping up to be an
America thought. Remember that horrible film from the 1970s? It's like every bad film,
every dystopian science fiction film incorporated into reality. It really is kind of strange
times to be living in. And we have President Trump as we approach the 250th anniversary of
the Declaration of Independence next year. He's looking at rejoining the
British Commonwealth program. We'll take a look at the implications of that. We'll
also take a look at how tech is seeking to reverse the effects of the Tower of Babel.
Is it a new Pentecost or is it an Antichrist version of that as well?
And in the EU crane, as we should call it, I guess, man, they are talking about giving
people free McDonald's burgers to re-up.
We'll be right back. Well, it's great to be back and I really do appreciate Gar doing a great job.
I had so many people emailing me and writing me about what a good job they thought he did
and it's always great to have somebody do the live show for me to be able to interact
with people.
I had some great guests as well.
But I want to begin today with money, the monetary system, the imminent restructuring of the monetary system.
As a matter of fact, this is from bombthrower.com.
As I say, are we going to have a new Bretton Woods using Bitcoin?
Are you using some kind of a stable coin?
Is this a trap?
We're now starting to see states bringing in their own digital coins, a stable coin,
backed by gold.
We've got Max Keiser saying that's the way of the future.
Max Keiser, one of the biggest supporters of Bitcoin, always a maximalist on Bitcoin.
Is this going to be the way they're going to do this through the back door?
I think it is.
And I've been saying this from the very beginning.
As bombtour.com says, we're witnessing the tough decisions
required to begin a great unwind. He says, a shift back to sound money. We'll see about
that. So again, Trump, Scott, Besant, you have Doug Burgum, also all of them saying
essentially the same thing and making some very troubling
comparisons
To what they might do with our massive assets. We just had Doug Burgum do another
interview with Breitbart
Talking about the massive dollar figures and how the US is not really bankrupt even though we got 37 trillion dollars in debt
We're not bankrupt. We got all kinds of assets that we could sell off
Yeah, that's bankruptcy thinking right there.
And commercial real estate is starting to come around, as Joe Slinty has been talking
about for quite some time.
Now these loans are starting to re-up, and other people are talking about this now, finally.
He's been talking about this for five years.
They appear to be executing a multi-step plan
to transition the US financial system
away from fiat-based leverage
and back toward a structure that's rooted
in gold, commodities, and Bitcoin,
and maybe in land and minerals as well.
So I said, gold is hidden anchor of the system.
Is it really?
We're gonna take a look at how much gold is in Fort Knox and what percentage of the
debt it is.
Maybe they're going to do some kind of major restructuring.
Maybe the restructuring will have a major reevaluation of gold in order to cover themselves.
But of course the market's going to have something to say about that, isn't it?
Derivatives have created a massive pyramid of financial claims and Leutnick is the master
of this kind of scam.
He and Scott Bessent, these guys is Wall Street, what should we call them?
Sharks, robber barons, these are the people that did it back in 2007-2008.
They're about to do it again.
As a matter of fact, one of the signs of a top is we now have microloans being put out
by DoorDash.
Can't afford that hamburger?
We can finance it for you.
It's just even beyond the lunacy of the subprime mortgages and car loans and things
like that that were happening in 2007-2008. We have subprime hamburger loans. Now Wimpy
would be so excited. The things that used to be jokes are now being put in like America
Thun. They're now being put into reality. Foreign buyers have all but stopped accumulating U.S. Treasuries, a clear sign of de-dollarization.
But that's really what the stablecoin is about. Tether buys massive amounts of Treasuries.
And if foreign buyers and individual investors are not interested in buying the treasuries, then they can shift
this over to Tether. They can have them buy the junk bonds, and they will be happy to
make the commissions on all this as well. As nations seek settlement alternatives outside
the U.S. financial system, at the same time the dollar is rising as countries scramble
for them to pay off dollar-denominated debt.
The ultimate catch-22, says Bomthorne.
We're going to live through some very strange times, and lottus is going to be unpredictable.
We'll have to wait and see.
There's a lot of wild cards in this, but we can see the general contours, and they don't
look good. Deficits of reach on present levels were currently at 123% debt to GDP, but
Lutnik is talking about changing the way GDP is calculated as well. But it's no problem,
says Burgum. He doesn't think it's a real issue. During the Great Depression, those who saw the
collapse coming moved their wealth abroad or into gold or into some the Great Depression, those who saw the collapse coming moved their wealth
abroad or into gold or into some other hard assets, those who didn't maintain debt and
excessive spending right up until they were wiped out, says Bonthor.
After FDR confiscated gold in 1933, then revalued it in 1934, those who had already positioned
themselves benefited massively. But of course, if those who were foolish enough to turn in their gold when the government
said to do it, and you know, Gerald Flint, he's talked about his grandfather, I think
it was, nope, nope, government says to do it, we've got to do it. That was actually the mindset of the people that had custody of our daughter when we went
to China.
They had her for just a couple of months before we got there.
And the guy that was there gave her a handwritten note.
He said, do everything the government tells you to do.
Now that's not the message she's going to be getting from us.
When the government tells you to turn in your gold, you find a better hole to dig it into
or something like that because they're going to re-evaluate it.
Bitcoin is serving as the next central bank liquidity tool, says Bonthor.
I don't think so.
I think it's still gold.
What has happened with gold?
With all of the pump that Trump has done, and he's ready to do the Trump dump on a slitter
Trump D dump D
Bitcoin had a great fall
Even though he was pumping it as much as he could and I said this from the beginning
We even did a commercial about it and played it ad nauseam
it and played it ad nauseam. We had Yukon Cornelius talking about the hope and expectations of Trump and crypto. He said it was just a temporary thing. It was a buying opportunity
for gold and it was. Trump put gold on sale but he didn't change it from being the standard.
As a matter of fact after the big pump up, what did it get up to? $109,000 or something for Bitcoin? Then it lost a significant amount
of that. And then he hasn't done really too much in terms of his own actions to help crypto
because he showed just how corrupt it can be with his meme coins. The Trump coin, the
Melania coin, other things like that that
he was doing did nothing to inspire confidence. His Bitcoin reserve, the tweets that he put
out about that do nothing to inspire confidence. Instead it looks like more of an insider grift
as he brought in things that were not Bitcoin, not even Ethereum. He's talking about closely held, centrally controlled, transactional coins.
And he pumped them up as well.
If the US does launch a sovereign wealth fund, says Bob Throider, it will likely include
Bitcoin as part of the new reserve framework.
And it's this sovereign wealth fund that we're going to talk about. Do we have, is it appropriate for the government to talk about its wealth fund when it's this sovereign wealth fund that we're going to talk about.
Do we have, is it appropriate for the government to talk about its wealth fund when it's $37
trillion in debt, an astronomical amount?
Nobody could even imagine 50 years ago when a stupid movie was done, America thought.
And yet what they're looking at is really, instead of it being a sovereign wealth fund, I think it's more accurately described as a sovereign reverse mortgage.
This is what Doug Burgum is really pushing out, saying that's not really a big issue.
We have so many natural resources that we can sell.
To whom?
America's going to be on sale.
That's it.
Well, commercial real estate, as I said
before, Gerald Slinty has been talking about this ever since the lockdowns.
Ever since Trump introduced the globalist plan lockdown and did it in
lockstep, just as the Rockefeller people had wargamed back, they had four
different scenarios about when they were going to pull this stuff off.
See, that's the other thing about this.
It was all laid out, and it was all war-gamed,
and it was all practiced.
So they had four different scenarios.
Let's say there's a massive pandemic.
Imagine that.
After they'd been practicing it for 20 years,
after they'd done the first practice game
two months before 9-11, put out the legislation two months after 9-11, after the false flag
anthrax attack, and then they practiced it.
And then they had their simulations.
So what were the four possible scenarios?
Well, the worst possible scenario was that everybody would have the most authoritarian response that nothing else
would be allowed except what the government dictated.
That was lockstep.
And that's what they did.
They also acted in lockstep with each other worldwide.
It was a globalist coup.
And as part of that, the fallout from the lockstep and the shutdown of our
economy, the lockdown if you will, was the fallout of commercial real estate. Now it's
not just Gerald Slenty who's talking about it. This article is from Mises.org.
Commercial real estate is in serious trouble, they said. The tariff policy, the ponderous
commercial real estate market continues to
deteriorate even though that's what people are talking about the tariff policy. The thing that
very few people are paying attention to yet, even yet, is what's going on commercial real estate.
So Mises is talking about it. Biznow.com reports citing CoStar that US banks
reported delinquencies hit 1.57% at the end of the last year.
Now that doesn't sound like a lot, but that's a rate that they've not seen since the fourth
quarter of 2014, and it is an 88% increase from a decade ago.
So the 1.57% delinquency percentage means that more than $47 billion of loans
would have been delinquent by the end of the year.
Delinquencies in the commercial mortgage-backed securities are setting multiyear highs with
$38 billion in arrears at year end of 2024, a 41% increase from the previous year end.
So it's up 88% from a decade ago, 41% from a year ago.
So an optimism in the industry, however, is the highest it has been in eight years.
And the banks have been doing, well, I like this phrase here that they talked about,
extend and pretend. And the banks have been doing, well I like this phrase here that they talked about, extend
and pretend.
I don't know if they coined that or not, but that's pretty, kind of extend the loan and
pretend that you can pay it off.
How about that?
Extend and pretend.
That pretty much describes all of our financial policies from the federal government on out
to the banks who have made these loans.
We're going to extend, we're going to
keep doing a continuing resolution. That's kind of the bankers version of a
continuing resolution. Extend and pretend, hoping that the never-before-seen low
rates will miraculously turn and lift all boats. As JFK said, you know, the tide comes in,
it's gonna lift all boats. We're gonna do a tax cut. Well, no, that's not happening.
It's gonna lift all boats and it's to lift all boats, we're going to do a tax cut. Well, no, that's not happening. It's going to lift all boats and it's going to lift all buildings,
as Mises said. So the distress market sales nearly doubled to 6% in last year's fourth quarter.
Banks are growing more impatient with loan extensions and the modifications,
raising the amount of the 2025 debt maturities to $957 billion from just $659 billion in 2022.
Borrowers whose loans are maturing must confront interest rates that are going to be 300 basis
points higher.
Another 3% if you will, higher.
That's a big jump when you refinance your mortgage, your commercial mortgages, if they're
paying it at all.
So he gives the example of Starbucks, Seattle headquarters building.
The current rate is 2.3%.
If they refinance this, it's going to be somewhere around 5.5%.
The owners will eat the difference and they might do it if they got a tenant, he says,
like Starbucks, but a lot of the owners are just going to walk away.
And then what happens is Gerald Slinty has been talking about the owners walk away, the
banks are left with these bad loans.
They get enough of these bad loans, they're insolvent.
And so what is happening is the New York Fed and a lot of bank regulators and examiners
are looking at this and they're about to blow the whistle on extend and pretend.
They said their researchers at the New York Fed are on high alert concerning
the continuing commercial real estate maturity wall. The maturity wall. We never
got the border wall. Instead what we're getting is a maturity wall on
commercial real estate after Trump did the lockdown and locked
everybody out. They are believing that as the researchers and the regulators believe the banks
are under-capitalized. Regulators, credit rating agencies, providers of funding might scrutinize
bank maturity extensions more closely and force banks to accept defaults rather than granting more
maturity extensions.
These defaults could lead to deposit runs, runs on the banks like the Great Depression,
and or trigger a wave of foreclosures or sales of loans in secondary markets.
And I think that they will let this thing go through because understand part of moving
and restructuring the financial system is to get rid of the banks, certainly all the
banks except for the big half dozen or so.
They will be partners in whatever the new financial system is.
But all the rest of these banks that you deal with on a regular basis, savings and loans,
they've got to go away.
Potter and his people will be fine, but the Bailey savings and loans has got to go. That has
always been the purpose of the central bank digital currency, and all we're seeing is
a rebranding and a slight restructuring of this, maintaining the worst features that
we all worried about. So we're looking at potential mass bank failures. And this is
Aaron Day has a piece up at Brownstone Institute and I've interviewed Aaron Day
multiple times. He said, we look we've already got CBDC in a stealth form and
he's still sounding the alarm on that. He says the stablecoin trap. That's what Luke Nick is there for the stable coin trap,
the back door to total financial control.
And I absolutely agree with him on this.
I've been talking about it as a PPP digital money,
public private partnership for digital money.
Instead of a central bank digital currency. on the sports you love with that river sports book must be 19 plus available in Ontario only
please play responsibly if you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to
you please contact connects ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor free of charge ppp dc
and it'll be the the robber barons and the friends of uh. DG8, thank you for the tip, he says,
David, what's your thought about Trump wanting the USA to join the British
Commonwealth? That's coming up. I'm gonna talk about that. This is treasonous. I
agree. His cult can't stop making excuses. All they say is, he's not worried. He's just
trolling them. Yeah, yeah, just like he was trolling Canada to say keep calling them the 51st state and what is happening with that?
We're going to talk about the implications of that. What would happen if that goes through?
Why might he want to do that? That's coming up. We will talk about that. But first I want to finish with this and with America-thon
the This is Aaron Day But first I want to finish with this and with America-thon.
This is Aaron Day.
He says, in accounting, the purpose of a ledger is to track all financial activity in your
company, your assets, your liabilities, your purchases, your sales, your income, your expenses,
the ledger.
We have a blockchain ledger, don't we?
It's publicly available to everybody to take a look at for most of the currencies.
There's only a few of them that are,
that are, that's encrypted.
Not very many, and not very many people use that.
So the vast majority of these so-called crypto currencies,
and I call them, I say so-called,
because everybody thinks, well, if they're crypto,
they're, that's private, it's encrypted.
No, it's not.
Only the stuff that they use to calculate it's encrypted. No, it's not. Only the stuff that they use to
calculate it is encrypted. But the ledger is public, and the ledger is
everything, everything in your life. As a matter of fact, it's kind of frightening to
look at. A lot of people talking about this rally that Bernie Sanders and AOC
did, and they had, oh look, we've got 34,000 people. Well it
turns out that some people got the geospatial intelligence of their cell
phones yet again. You know we saw this at January the 6th in DC and I've been
sounding the alarm on January the 6th. I've been sounding the alarm on geospatial
intelligence which became the fastest growing branch of the
intelligence community going back to the late 1990s in anticipation of the phones
that they're going to be rolling out the internet and so forth. And they were able
to determine that not only did they the exact number of people in attendance
because everyone has got one of these little devices, and this information is
publicly available.
But they're also able to go into demographics and even into what they call psychographics,
which is really what geospatial intelligence is about.
We'll be talking about that coming up as well.
But the, as Aaron Day says, the government has already created a digital ledger for each
citizen to digitize everything in their life. Geospatial intelligence is already there
to a large degree, but financially it's even worse. The battle isn't about
stopping a future CBDC. The battle is about recognizing the financial
surveillance system that already exists, Arendt and it's
going to get worse that's the issue it's going to get much worse with the things
that are being plotted by Trump and Lutnik and Besant these and Bergham these
other he says your financial sovereignty is already under attack and the last off ramps are disappearing.
Disappearing.
Well, a new Utah law is going to allow state vendors to be paid in gold and silver.
And that sounds really good, doesn't it?
Except, you know, it sounds like it's going to be legal tender.
Except it's not exactly what it appears to be. When you look at the details on
this, this new law now awaiting a signature from the governor Spencer Cox,
authorizes the state treasurer to issue a competitive procurement for precious
metals backed electronic payment platform. Okay, that's good. But says Ken Ivory who put
this in, Utah became the first state to recognize gold and silver as legal
tender. Now an electronic payment system will create more flexibility by
fractionalizing physical silver and gold. So you understand what's happening here. This is a digital money that is gold-backed.
It's a state version of it. And that is, again, the trap of stablecoin. Stablecoin, whether it
is backed by a dollar or backed by gold, it still allows them to do complete surveillance, destroys your privacy, your financial transactional
privacy, and it also allows them to basically turn off the switch. So again, this is a trap.
A digital currency backed by gold is a trap. Go for the real thing. There is no other alternative,
quite frankly. Nothing else is going to offer you the anonymous privacy of
having physical gold and silver or cash or whatever. So Ken Ivory, the
representative who introduced this, said this law gives people in Utah an
alternative to choose how they preserve the purchasing
power of their earnings and savings.
Again, tying it to, you know, when you talk about having a stable coin, as many people
pointed out, something of a joke to tie a stable coin to a fiat currency that is constantly
losing its money.
Max Keiser, gold-backed stablecoins will out-compete
the US dollar stablecoins, he said. I'm not interested in either one, frankly. Gold-backed
stablecoins will out-compete US dollar-pegged alternatives due to gold's inflation-hedging
properties and minimum volatility, according to Max Ke Kaiser, who has been Mr. Bitcoin for
quite some time, and very vocal about it.
He said, governments of foreign nations with adversarial relationship to the US will not
accept dollar-pegged stablecoins.
And again, that's what they're going to try to pull using Tether, using Leutnik.
That's why he's in this position where he's at. They're going to try to get around that by having tether by the T-bills that
foreign governments do not want to have. Max Keiser said Russia, China and Iran
are not going to accept a US dollar stablecoin. I predict they will counter
the US dollar stablecoin with a gold one. China and Russia have a combined
50,000 tons of gold, much more than what is
reported. That is much, much more than what is reported. As a matter of fact, if we
look at what is reported, the US is still supposedly the number one in terms of
the amount of gold that we have, something like 8,000 tons, half
of it at Fort Knox roughly.
And China is way, way down.
People don't believe that that is all of China.
But I think 50,000 tons of gold, that is a humongous amount.
Anyway, he says that they're going to try to extend the dollar's dominance.
Here's a way that
Max summed it up, which I think is pretty accurate. He said Bitcoin is deflationary
but it is volatile. Gold tracks inflation and is minimally volatile. He says the US
dollar has no volatility but you are guaranteed to lose your purchasing power.
It's like a, you know, a leaky drink or something, you know. Hey look, I've got it on a can except it's all disappearing as you go. Stablecoin issuer Tether has launched a gold back stablecoin.
They call it Alloy. They launched it in June of last year, prepping for this.
Tether Gold is what the dollar used to be before 1971, said one person.
And this Tether Gold is up 15.7% year to date, while the broad crypto market is in the red.
Now think about this.
Why is it up only 15.7% year to date? Because what this is doing is
essentially another rebranding and relabeling of paper gold. And I bet if you look at the
agreement for tether gold, it probably works out the same as it does for the paper gold
or the paper silver, where you have bought shares not of gold or silver, you're
not buying a tenth of an ounce in gold or silver.
What you're doing is you're buying ownership into a fund, and the fund may or may not have
that gold or silver in the Shanghai Gold Exchange.
This is why you've got gotta watch these sharks. They're constantly creating new
instruments like, oh look we've got a new tether gold. We've got a stable coin
that is backed by gold instead of by the dollar. Is it really backed by gold? Can
you really trade this thing in and get gold? No, no. Now in Utah that may be the case, but that is certainly not the case with tether gold
or with a paper gold.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bezence said the administration will focus on using dollar
pegged stable coins to protect the dollar's reserve currency status.
They've already told you what they're doing with it.
The thing I need is to try to prop up the T-bills that nobody wants to buy because
we have piled up so much debt.
The March 7th White House crypto summit, he said the stablecoin regime would be a top
priority for this administration.
U.S. lawmakers have also introduced several stablecoin bills to establish a comprehensive
regulatory framework for these tokenized fiat assets. Think about that. Fiat is bad
enough. Now they're gonna tokenize it with derivatives. It's not even the real
thing. This is a token that represents that. Didn't anybody learn anything from
the tokenized, securitized garbage loans that were around 10 10 you know well what was it 2007 2008 it's it's ridiculous
but of course that's part of what the genius stablecoin build i've talked about uh not last
week i wasn't here but before that two weeks ago and there's also even a second one the stable
act of 2025 but the other one is called the genius act. So how much gold is actually in
Fort Knox? Well, they say that at the current prices it'd be $428 billion, and yet our debt is
$37 trillion. So it means that if we were to back up the dollar with gold, then we would have 1.1% of the debt. Now that's just Fort Knox, and
that's about half. Okay, so 2.2%. Great. That means that they're going to be selling off
assets folks, and that's what these people are talking about. Doug Burgum, he said when
he was doing the Senate confirmation hearing, remember I've quoted this several
times, well I think that if we sold off all of our federal lands, which again
they don't own constitutionally, if we sold off all this federal land to whom?
To the Chinese? To the Russians? Who's's gonna be buying this stuff then I think we've got two hundred trillion dollars worth of assets
he just had an exclusive interview with Breitbart they'd love having this access
well you give them access and they're like putty in your hands
Breitbart has become just like CNN or MSNBC or Fox News. They have become a parrot function
for whatever the political party is that they are aligned with.
Breitbart, of course, being aligned with Trump
and the Republicans.
That's how the same thing happened to Rush Limbaugh
in his early days.
He was very independent, had hopes for him.
Then he just became a partisan shill.
That's what Breitbart has become, just
partisan shills. So they're very excited about the fact they had an exclusive with Doug Burgum,
who is now telling a different tune. Still the same plan, but when he told the Senate,
he said it was $200 trillion. Now, in this conference, he said $100 trillion.
We lost half of the value in just a couple of weeks.
Just a few weeks ago that he was having that confirmation hearing.
This was a Wednesday policy event that was hosted by Breitbart News and they were able
to get Doug Burgum, the Interior Secretary, to come.
Aren't you impressed at their access?
Of course they got access. They'll lie for him, right? They said the conference was just blocks
away from the White House. Aren't you impressed? It's so amazing to me how easy these people are
bought off easily. Just give them access and big name interviews and things like that and you
own them. So it was just blocks away from the White House in Washington DC they
met they had in case you didn't know but the White House was in Washington DC.
Perhaps their readers don't know. I don't. Excuse me. Set up fiery statements from
Burgum as he was interviewed on stage by Breitbart News'
Washington bureau chief, Matt Boyle.
And Burgum said, you've heard more than once or twice or ten times that we've got 36 and
a half trillion dollars a day.
I mean, it's an advertisement, so we hear it all the time.
Well, he said, well, when I was going through the Senate hearings, he didn't mention the
fact that when he's going through the Senate hearings, he told them 200 trillion of assets,
and now that's dropped to 100 trillion of assets.
He said, I told them, you know, what's our debt, 36 and a half trillion?
Well, what are our assets?
I mean, I challenge anybody to go try to find a current balance sheet for the United States
of America.
And he's singing from the same script that Besant and Luukneke are talking about, putting
our assets to work.
Well, what are our assets?
He said, well, we have financial assets.
We have national land that could be used as an asset to offset the debt. And this is what they've
been planning for quite some time. That's why Trump put him in as Interior
Secretary. Now it makes me see what's going to happen to this, I think it was
summit, the pipeline, the CO2 pipeline. Gonna capture CO2, pump it across the continent in a pipeline and into the
ground in North and South Dakota. And Doug Burgum and Kristi Noem, both of whom
have been given cabinet positions in the Trump administration, along with a CEO of
that pipeline company, met with Trump and Mar-a-Lago for this ridiculous scheme.
You see, they're gonna pull the same kind of green,
washed grift that the liberals are doing. It's just going to be different people,
different companies, and different types of things. Rather than spending a lot of money on
electric vehicles and chargers and things like that, they're going to spend money on capturing and transferring CO2 into the ground 2,500 miles away.
There's your difference in Republicans and Democrats, in case you want to know.
So it remains to be seen what's going to happen with that.
They just had a setback with that, because they just had a court decision saying that
this pipeline company cannot use eminent domain to steal people's land.
So I don't know what's going to happen to that pipeline.
But these people have been not only grifting for that kind of stuff, Doug Burgerman, Trump,
but they've also been planning to loot the United States.
The land in the United States doesn't belong to the government.
Everything doesn't belong to the government.
You've got to get out of that mindset. They have no legal authority to the government. Everything doesn't belong to the government. You've got to get out of that
mindset. They have no legal authority to own this. The Constitution says that they can own Washington,
D.C., and a few ports and forts. End of story. The land is supposed to belong to the American people. They're gonna sell it to corporations
and many foreign corporations.
And so while he's talking to Breitbart,
Doug Burgum says,
I can tell you as the head of Interior,
head of the Interior Department,
where just in Interior,
we've got 500 million acres of surface,
and Brooke Rollins has another
200 million in the US Forest Service. Now she is the aporachic, the Republican
aporachic from Texas running the USDA. And for some reason they put the forests,
forestry service under the USDA. So Brooke Rollins controls 200 million and he controls 500 million.
Do you have a problem with that?
I do.
I do.
Folks, this is just communism.
It's just socialism.
And it is a complete denial of what is in the Constitution.
The Constitution matters.
Why?
Because if they have gotten rid of every aspect of the Constitution, what difference
does it make anymore, right? Like George W. Bush has said to have said, it's just a piece
of paper. Well, it's a piece of paper that they swore to uphold as a condition of their
job and their authority. And that's why it's important. It was a good plan, a flawed
plan because it created difficulties for them, checks and balances and other
things like that, but don't worry they found a way around it. It might have
taken them a while, might have taken them a generation or two, but they found a way around it
to completely subvert the Constitution. By the way, whatever they come up with with the technocracy, we may not see the end of it. Our children, our grandchildren
may not see the end of it, but it will end. People will come, you know, whatever you do,
people will find a way to get rid of that. And so that's one of the people in America just
haven't been paying
attention to the government. The people are paying attention to it with the
politicians, and it became an impediment to what they wanted to do. So they got
rid of it. Once this technocracy becomes an oppressive impediment, it's not going
to be easy to get rid of, but we will find a way. The mass of humanity will find a way to break free of this stuff.
But it may take a very long time.
But anyway, you've got these two bureaucrats.
One of them controls and owns 200 million acres of land, and the other one owns 500
million acres.
And so Doug Burgum can add, he said, so that's 700 million acres of surface.
700 million acres of subsurface that we have mineral rights,
critical minerals, oil and gas, you know, metallurgical, thermal, coal, resources, all
this kind of stuff.
So we have 700 million acres of surface stuff.
Who owns those surface rights?
Those have already been sold to people.
You're just going to get rid of them?
Burg them?
Again, this goes back to the Bundy Ranch and all the things that were happening, not just
with ranchers, not just the grazing rights and water rights, but also with logging rights
and mining rights and other things like that.
Those are deeds of property.
Everybody as much as whatever your house sits on, or your car, or whatever.
But these people think it belongs to them, and
they've done everything they can to drive off the ranchers and the farmers
and the miners and the loggers, because the plan has always been to divvy this
up with their corporate robber barons. And as many says, and then there's
another two and a half billion acres of offshore. In other words, this is underwater, their 200-mile limit that they put around the perimeter
of the country.
I guess you could say those assets are underwater, but not as far underwater as the U.S. government
and its debt.
Anyway, so he said, these are huge, huge assets for us.
And so Doug Burgum tells Breitbart, he says, so if you take our forests, our lands, our
grasslands, our lands that are near urban areas, who is the you?
So if the corporations take all this stuff, let's just translate this for you. If the corporations take all of this stuff,
all of our mineral resources, all of our offshore resources,
he said,
that's gonna be two or three times what our national debt is.
So we can just keep spending money, right?
Again, it was just a couple of months ago that he said, we had $200 trillion.
Now that's been dropped to $100 trillion.
He's kind of making this stuff up.
He said, you know, the announcement might lower the 10-year rate on interest rates because
people would say, wow, these guys got it covered, and they have a plan on how they're going
to be able to pay down the debt, and they're actually in really good shape.
So he and Treasury Secretary Besant and Commerce Secretary Lutnick think if they announce this
that they're going to sell off all the country's natural assets, then the interest rates are
going to go down, everything's going to be just wonderful.
You know, it turns out if you sell off everything good and beautiful about the United States,
you can continue to fund these forever wars.
It's great.
Yeah, you could fund the welfare warfare state forever, right?
I mean, when you look at the exploding debt, they better act soon because pretty soon we're
going to be even if we were to sell every natural resource that they can imagine above
and below the land, above and below the sea.
Even if we were able to do that, we're still going to be out of money.
As a matter of fact, again, we've been talking about America. If I remember this movie, it's part of the trailer.
People have stopped driving cars and started living in them
The president has sold the White House raffled off the jewel the unknown soldier and moved into a rundown condo
City of San Diego has been bought by Mexico
Bad planning is why your country is in the toilet. The country is flat broke.
I know a way to raise money.
A telethon.
American-thon.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's Pectack, your American-thon event.
I can see Trump doing this.
You can settle Cleveland when nobody's...
A mother-son boxing match.
...in all our cars when nobody's driving.
And now, meet Lowe low versus the last living automobile.
Chet Roosevelt, you're president.
And I love you.
Trump loves us too.
Chet Roosevelt.
It's actually, this is the real beach boys here.
I was surprised.
They probably wanted to wipe
that off of their resume. That was an awful, awful movie. American Thon, Elvis Costello,
a bunch of people. What was it? John Ritter, I think it was. Anyway, that was done in the
background. Of course, we're out of oil, we're out of gas, we're out of money. And that was
done as we were lining up for oil, I believe, or right after that it happened.
So everybody is walking or riding bicycles, which is what they're doing in New York right
now.
They're forcing us into this.
We're not out of oil.
But these people want to make sure that we are out of space to drive our cars.
And so you have an explosion in Paris in terms of bike lanes.
They weren't doing the same thing in New York City as well. No, they're gonna all of this stuff
But ain't do is we're out of money. We're out of space for driving cars. We've got plenty of oil and gas
but they won't let us use it and so
When we look at where this is all headed. I
Think it is interesting to keep this all in perspective in terms of this crypto stuff
You got people like lucky Lutnik
Who I call him lucky Lutnik because he was lucky enough not to show up to work
On 9-eleven when he had 650 something of his employees went down with the towers
650 something of his employees went down with the towers. He had something else to do that day.
He had taken his kid to his first day of school or something like that.
He got really lucky, and he's been really lucky ever since.
And you've got people like Scott Besson, who broke the Bank of England for George Soros.
Now they're on the Trump team. It's funny how Trump's got all these people that were right at the heart of 9-11.
People like Rudy Giuliani, who got all the dust, you know, the places just reduced not
even to rubble, but just to absolute dust.
That's why a lot of people think it was a directed energy weapon as opposed to pre-planted
explosives. I think it was a directed energy weapon as opposed to pre-planted explosives, but it
is truly amazing that there really wasn't much in terms of rubble.
And they got that all moved away real quickly.
They didn't take time to get masks for any of the people there.
That's why I said many of them are sick and dying.
So that's 9-11 Rudy.
He's got Lucky Lutnik, all these people around Donald Trump.
So crypto for me, prison for thee.
This is from Free Thought Project, Matt Agouris.
He says, when banks embrace the blockchain, it's called innovation.
See, when Lucky Lutnik or Scott Bessent do it, it's innovation.
When you try this, oh, then it's money laundering.
And we've heard this over and over again. And they talk
about specifically the case of Roger Baer. But BlackRock is able to go out and launch
an ETF. You've had 50 crypto ETFs expected to receive approval. Now that we have completely done a 180 at the SEC, analysts predict that
2025 could be the year of crypto ETFs. And again, why do you even need to have a crypto
ETF? We're talking about doing digital gold, for example, as you fractionalize the gold,
theoretically, that they theoretically own own but why would you have
to do that with Bitcoin Bitcoin can be infinitely fractionalized again like a
reserve I don't understand the purpose of a Bitcoin reserve I don't understand
certainly the purpose of a Bitcoin ETF except that you know that they're up to
something this gang of thieves in Wall Street.
So again, Roger Ver is looking at prison time, but these people are looking at becoming trillionaires.
And as all this is happening, just to get you to understand how they're going to put
you under a microscope.
They have now said that, and this is part of Trump, they're going to get tough on the
drug war, right?
Everything is about the drug war, or it's about the border, or it's about protecting
children on the internet.
All of these invasions of our freedom are always about that.
Reason says, taking $200 out of an ATM should not trigger a federal financial surveillance
and investigation, but it does in certain
counties that are close to Mexico.
This is new policy from the Trump administration.
And this is taking $200 out in an ATM.
Now remember we had Dennis Hastert, the pedophile GOP Speaker of the House, longest serving
Speaker of the House they had.
Dennis Hastert, he was a wrestling coach and a pedophile. GOP Speaker of the House, longest-serving Speaker of the House they had, Dennis
Astert. He was a wrestling coach and a pedophile. This has been established as a
fact, and he was being blackmailed by one of his former students, but he had been
selected by the GOP specifically because he was blackmailable, because he was a
pedophile wrestling coach. So they put him in Congress and then they made sure
that he became Speaker of the House and he was there for
a very long time. And then after he retired they found out that he was
paying off this blackmailer and the bank asked him questions because you know the
bank is coerced into being nosy and monitoring everybody so the bank had to
ask him questions, why are you taking this amount of money out? We need to know. You know, gave him some excuse and then he started taking
it out in regular small amounts. They call that structuring. This is money he had already
paid taxes on. Why are they involved in all of this? It should be a non-crime. They didn't
come after him for being a pedophile. Never came after him for being a pedophile, even
though the judge referenced that when he sentenced him to
jail for taking his own money out of his own bank account. And now they are very
serious about it. Pedophilia is still going on. There's still no statute of
limitations for pedophilia, but they're getting smaller and smaller amounts to
see what you're doing. Now if you take $200 out of an ATM, they want the federal government, they're going to make
a federal case out of it.
They want the federal government to know and start paying attention to you.
And this is all done in the name of protecting people from drugs.
You know they have intercepted more eggs than fentanyl coming across the Mexican border
now.
I'm not saying that fentanyl coming across the Mexican border now?
I'm not saying that fentanyl is not a problem.
I'm saying the war on drugs is a problem.
And I'm saying that the war on drugs doesn't help anybody.
Doesn't help anybody.
It makes it all worse.
The war on drugs is why we've got things like fentanyl.
But under Trump's executive orders
about international drug cartels,
calling them foreign terrorist organizations, this is going to be the basis for which they're going to do this.
FinCEN, I like that, it's like financial sin.
You took money out of your account.
You took more than $200 out of your account.
That's financial sin.
Now it's the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, it's not S-I-N. They announced a new rule cracking
down on cash transactions only in certain geographical regions. But folks, the purpose
of all this digital stuff and the purpose of having a ledger, which all these digital
coins, whether they're from the central bank or whether they're from private individuals,
are all about a public ledger that they can read.
The purpose of all this is to pay attention
to every penny that you spend.
And what is really concerning about this is,
and people have not closed the loop to think about this,
is the fact that AI, and we see this to some degree
with Doge, people are celebrating,
oh look, this is great, he can see everything.
There's complete transparency. And you even had Alex Karp with Palantir. This is a guy
who lives, breathes all of this geospatial intelligence and surveillance of people all
the time. And he's saying, well, the Democrats don't realize, and I love the Democrats, and
he is, he's a Democrat. He loves everything the Democrats do. He said, what they don't realize is they can't hide from this. It's everywhere. And he said, they
need to join with it. Join or die type of thing. Become one with the Borg, whatever
the Star Trek reference is. And so, as conservatives are celebrating the fact that Elon Musk is finding all this stuff,
how is he finding it?
Well, he's scanning through this stuff very quickly using artificial intelligence.
As a matter of fact, with the JFK files coming out, Grok is pushing everybody to say, �Hey,
you want me to analyze the JFK files and see if the CIA is involved?� It's pushing that.
It's enticing people to do do that because it can go through those
88,000 pages really quickly and summarize them and look for various things. So
This is the power of AI
They are collecting information. They want to make everything that's visible be visible out there
But when they bring AI to bear
out there, but when they bring AI to bear, then they're going to be able to data mine it, to collate it, to make sense of everything that you do.
So FinCEN has issued a geographic targeting order.
And so this is geofencing to surveil, to further combat illicit activities
and money laundering in the
Mexico-based cartels. It's illicit activities of the US government, and it's
only money laundering if you're the one that is looking at novel things. If it's
being done by Lutnick or it's being done by Besson, then that's fine.
30 zip codes across California and Texas are the ones where they're going to focus
in on.
Now, the interesting thing is that this $200 cash withdrawal, so it can make you the subject
of a federal financial investigation, the federal government first began requiring banks
to log and report all cash transactions of $10,000 or more in 1952."
And so Reason looks at it and says, well, you know, the government has devalued the
U.S. dollar significantly since 1952, right?
And they said, if you kept that $10,000 threshold in 1952, what would that be today?
It would be $180,000. And so, our
government in 1952 was not worried about somebody taking out cash unless they're taking out
nearly $200,000 today. But now our government, in its desire to know and control everything,
in its desire to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent,
and its desire to be God, it wants to know if you take out not $200,000, but $200 in
cash. Because it's a war on cash. First of all, they have destroyed the value of the
money. Now they want to destroy the cash. Trump is starting with
a penny but he's not gonna stop with a penny. Marky Mark, thank you for the tip,
you said, Lutnik's brother was in the Twin Towers on 9-11. If Lucky Lutnik were
really tipped off about 9-11, why didn't he warn his brother? Do you know that he
didn't want to have sole ownership of it. I know that. Yeah, you
know, one of the things that we, you know, Markey, one of the things that we make a
mistake about is we constantly underestimate the evil and the
technology that these people have. I would never let my brother be murdered
But I would also not murder and be in on a plot to take down 3,000 people and we had somebody that did that
However, they did it whether it was controlled explosions or whether it was directed to energy weapons or whatever
They murdered 3,000 people to kick off
the first shoe of
What the second shoe was to drop with a lockdown. They did it to restructure society and they don't care who they kill.
Do you think these people have a conscience about the people that they vaccinated?
You think they have a conscience about the people that they suffocated with ventilators
and the rest of this stuff?
You have to come to terms with the
evil that they're capable of doing. Don't project what you would do. I know you
would tell your brother, I would tell my brother if I had one, but I don't for a
minute think that people like him would ever be stopping at
something like that.
If he had some foreknowledge of it,
I don't think that that's a disproof
that he would have let that happen.
Well, we're gonna take a quick break.
It's been going on for almost an hour here.
We're gonna take a quick break and we will be right back. So
Do So
So So
So I'm gonna be a good boy You're listening to The David Knight Show.
A penny saved is a penny earned.
Though, that's gotten tougher since they've stopped making them.
Maybe it's time to start saving a different type of coin, such as the new David Knight
Show supporter Commemorative coin.
Saving these coins earns support for independent media.
Featuring striking bass relief with bold raised details and premium painted accents.
It's not just a trinket, but a statement, a declaration.
A way to show you refuse to be controlled by the establishment.
It's a limited run of just 100 coins.
So much like the penny, when they're gone, they're gone.
They silence independent voices.
They censor the truth.
But you can stand with real journalism and own a piece of the resistance.
These coins saved is the David Knight Show sustained.
Available now at the David Knight Show dot com.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
All right now, welcome back, and I just want to make this announcement too by the way they're
selling very good but we did not get them out last week any of the ones that ordered
last week our shipping department was on vacation as well Karen was our shipping department
and she was on vacation as well.
My fault my fault.
Yeah that's right.
Travis came back.
It's my son's fault he's too cute you just can't get away from him you don't want to
leave.
That's right.
He came back and we saw our grandson for the first time, Travis' son.
And that was what we were doing last week.
And I really do, again, appreciate Gar and giving us time.
But I want to mention this.
This is a package that came back to us.
And Julian Woods, it looks like the address is fine on here, but this was returned to
us by the post office, said insufficient address is fine on here, but this was returned to us
by the post office, said insufficient address, unable to forward, returned to sender.
So we've got your package here.
Contact us, send us email at davidnightshow.com and we will get that back out to you.
So thank you very much for that.
And by the way, it reminds me, we also had
the website was down a bit last week because we were trying to add a shorter name to it.
We finally got that done successfully. Davidknight.news now redirects to thedavidknightshow.com. And
so we've got a much shorter name, better name, and very much like David Knight dot
gold, which I didn't mention when I'm talking about all of this money stuff and how you
need to hold your own gold.
Well, the best way to do that is to go to David Knight, go to David Knight dot gold,
not the David Knight dot gold.
That'll take you to Tony Arterbon, Wise Wolf Gold.
You can buy gold or silver on a regular monthly basis.
Nobody else does this with Wolf Pack.
And so you can buy in at a lot of different levels.
I think the lowest one is 50.
They've got a kids pack for 35.
And you'll get gold or silver each month.
Of course you can also buy larger small amounts directly
as a one-time thing, but he's also got
the Wolf Pack that is there.
And I've dealt with Tony for a very long time I think that there is no
substitute for gold and silver and for having it in physical form so again you
can get that at davidknight.gold so now we have davidknight.gold and we have
davidknight.news so hopefully that'll be a little bit easier to remember. Well we had a Keir Starmer, the occupant of number 10 Downing Street right now, went to
the White House and handed Trump a letter and it was actually an invitation.
You remember when this happened? It is my pleasure to bring from His Majesty the King a letter.
He sends his best wishes and regards, of course, but he also asked me to bear this letter and bring it to you.
So can I present the letter from the King?
Thank you very much.
Am I supposed to read it right now?
Yes. This is very much. Am I supposed to read it right now? No.
You know, this is very awkward.
I've got to tell him what your reaction is.
So I need to know.
I need to know.
He's a great gentleman.
A great, great gentleman.
I've had a lot of people saying, can he actually read?
Because he didn't even...
Hmm, yes.
Must be a very long letter. He's taking a very long letter.
He's taking a very long time.
Oh, that's wonderful.
Oh, yes.
Wonderful.
Well, that is really nice.
I must make sure his signature is on that.
Otherwise, it's not quite as meaningful.
It is, and that's quite a signature, isn't it?
Beautiful.
Yeah, he's got a signature.
Beautiful.
I don't know what it says, but.
Beautiful man, and we appreciate it.
I've known him.
I've gotten to know him very well, actually.
Yeah.
First term and now second term.
Perhaps you'd like to say what that very important thing is.
Can you explain to people what this says?
This is a letter from His Majesty the King.
It's an invitation for a second state visit.
This is really special. This has never happened before. This is unprecedented. And I think
that just symbolizes the strength of the relationship between us. So this is a very special letter.
I think the last state visit was a tremendous success.
It was.
His Majesty the King wants to make this even better.
It's an invitation.
So it wasn't something that was really, really long.
But he had it delivered personally by his trusted servant.
Message for you, sir.
And there are many people in England who would probably love to see that happen to Keir Starmer.
Anyway so now he has been invited for a second appearance.
Unprecedented.
You should be so honored that the British monarchy is going to allow you to come a second
time.
Especially after you touched the Queen and all the rest of the stuff the first time you broke all these different protocol things
that you didn't care about.
But now, it was put out by the Daily Mail that King Charles is making a secret offer
to Donald Trump, except it's not secret at all.
And Trump retweeted that article, said, oh yeah, this is great.
I like the idea of this at all.
So what is this secret offer?
Well, to join the Commonwealth.
Plans are allegedly in the works to make the USA the next, quote, associate member of the
Commonwealth.
And that's key.
Associate.
What does that mean?
In February, a tariff war began between the US and Canada, with Trump signing orders to
impose near-universal tariffs on goods from Canada entering the United States.
And again, every time I talk about this tariff thing, number one, it's a tax.
It'll be paid by you.
Number two, in the past, these taxes at the border had the purpose of either being targeted
to protect a particular
industry, that was what was being done in the late 1800s by McKinley and his administration,
or as it was done by Thomas Jefferson because he was able to reduce the size of government
to get it to fit in the Constitution.
He said, well, we can run the government off of the money that we collected at the borders,
tariffs.
But this is not about funding the government like it was under Jefferson.
This is not about even trying to protect an industry.
And we could all, we could talk about whether or not that's an effective strategy, whether
or not that works.
But it's not about that at all.
This is simply attacking a country.
A country which he had bragged about signing a trade agreement with.
USMCA, that was his thing.
That was his rebranding of NAFTA.
It was not a good agreement.
But he was the one that did it, and he broke that agreement.
So again, will this Commonwealth, being an associate of the Commonwealth, will that defuse this
trade war?
And would he abide by it?
If he became a member of the Commonwealth, would he abide by that, since he didn't abide
even by his own USMCA treaty?
Suggestions for the US to join the Commonwealth were first made during Trump's first stint
in the White House by the Royal Commonwealth Society with the blessings of Queen Elizabeth.
By the way, the King is launching a podcast.
He's going to do it right ahead of Commonwealth Day.
Isn't that special?
Even the King is going to have a podcast.
What is he going to talk about?
What he sent the servants out to do that day?
What has he ever done?
They're grooming the stool, they're growing out their...
And so I said to my servants, servants, bring me that letter.
The latest letter was hand delivered to the president by Keir Starmer.
And so again, Trump was able to see that it was signed.
I didn't read it.
I'm sure there wasn't a lot said in there, but he just stares at it for a long time.
Maybe you could tell people what this says.
And again, a lot of people are saying, can this guy even read?
I don't think he's ever read the Constitution or the Bible.
He put that all together, but I don't think he's read any of those things. If he has, he's not going to abide by them.
Anyway, the Commonwealth dates back to the first half of the 20th century when the British
Empire was breaking up and they came up with a, trying to create something of a trade block
out of it or something like that. There are no legal obligations between each state. Some
of them have institutional links to others
through the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth Charter defines a list of shared values for democracy,
human rights, the rule of law between its members, and yet what is the state of human rights and
democracy and all the rest of stuff in the UK? Do they have free speech? That's a joke.
and all the rest of stuff in the UK. Do they have free speech? That's a joke! They'll arrest you for praying in your own home if you're close to an abortion
center. Do they have the right to keep him bare arms? Oh absolutely, no. What
about the free exercise of religion and all the rest of stuff? They don't honor any
of these things. Anyway, Trump said on Truth Social Friday morning. I love King Charles.
And of course, who doesn't love lovable King Charles?
You just want to grab him by the ears, don't you?
He's not one of the most lovable people out there, I think.
Especially since he is part of the depopulation cult that wants to kill us all running the Earth League
along with John Schellenhuber who was the this this Pope's leader. It makes sense I
bet that was just like one of those middle school notes like do you like me
circle yes or no so he's just out on true social letting him know. Well
actually some people have it was pretty hard to find the actual clip of him handing
the letter because the thing that has really taken over on Twitter is he hands him that
letter and Trump looks down and then they've got a shot like over his shoulder where he's
looking at the letter and it's like this cartoon obscenity about Trump.
And Trump is looking at it and then Starmor has got this expression on his face.
They keep cutting back and forth between Trump and Starmor and this obscene piece of paper
that was there.
As a matter of fact, I sent that to you first to put in the thing and I realized, well,
wait a minute, that's the wrong one.
But yeah.
So anyway, Trump also reposted the same report about the King's secret offer of membership
late Saturday morning after he put the Daily Mail article out there and said, well, sounds
good to me.
We should rejoin Great Britain.
And again, maybe we could do it by the anniversary of our Declaration of Independence.
Maybe we could make America Great Britain again.
How about that?
So Fox News This is from Fox News. They actually felt the need to tell us listen to this
The US was a part of the British Empire before winning independence after the revolution
They felt it necessary to put that in there. I guess they know their audience, don't they?
Feel insulted if I was actually somebody who followed Fox News. But anyway, maybe their readers are really
that ignorant. They certainly aren't going to learn much reading Fox News. But so what does this really mean?
What would be the consequences? Well, full membership or associate membership?
This is the associate member has not, something has not even been defined.
So this would be some kind of nebulous status there. And so first of all, there's that.
We don't really know what they're talking about in terms of membership.
But so it's been floated around, but it's not something that's been done at all.
Full membership would require, most likely require, that you recognize the monarchy as the king is head of the Commonwealth.
But some republics like India, South Africa, do not recognize the British monarch, but
most of them do.
They do in Canada, for example.
Domestic politics.
A lot of Americans are not going to be too happy about Trump rejoining in any way, shape
or form with Great Britain on the anniversary of our Declaration of Independence.
But of course we already are joined at the hip.
Maybe it would be better to say joined at the eyes with British intelligence.
That's what the five eyes are.
These people are the real government.
It's not King Charles.
It's not Donald Trump.
The real government are the spies in both of our countries and they're the ones who
are sharing information already. So we already have a Commonwealth in that
regard, in the worst regard. But in terms of economic implications, Commonwealth
members enjoy trade costs that average 21% lower due to shared legal systems, language,
historical ties, and things like that.
So again, it might be lowered, but the question is, what would we be buying from Britain? The UK is aiming for 95% low carbon electricity by 2030.
The UK under Keir Starmer is in an industrial suicide pact.
They're shutting down their power generation, they're shutting down their steel manufacturing,
all the rest of this stuff.
They are committing industrial suicide.
Germany is just a couple of steps behind them.
But England, UK, is in the lead with all this stuff.
So what in the world would we even need from them or be able to get from them when they're
putting themselves out of the manufacturing business?
Not even clear.
But again, it would lower tariffs.
So is that something that,
is that perhaps a reason why the British are making this overture to him? Again, I understand
that he put together the USMCA, but he's with Canada and Mexico, but he's ignoring that.
So diplomatic implications. Well, we have a special relationship with the UK. We have this special
organization called Five Eyes, as I just mentioned. The US, UK, Canada, New Zealand, Australia,
sharing information about us with each other. And of course, having this special relationship
allows them to get around any laws restricting them from spying on their own citizens and
if you have a restriction and you know
This is why even with FISA stuff even if they were to fix these exemptions that they have there
All they have to do is call their friends in the UK and say I'd like to spy on these Americans without a search warrant.
The UK can do that and then the UK can hand the information over. It's the same principle that
they've done for the longest time with a phone company. They early on established the fact that
AT&T, the phone companies in general, but it was predominantly AT&T, could keep all kinds of records about who you called
and so forth, and not necessarily what you talked about,
but they could figure out what was going on,
just having the records of who you called
and who called you.
And they established the fact,
well, that belongs to the phone company.
That's not David's data, for example.
So if the phone company wants to,
if I ask the phone company,
give me all of David Knight's phone records, then that's up to the phone company and they can
turn that over to us if they want. We don't need to have a search warrant. And that's
the same game they play with these intelligence agencies as part of Five Eyes. And then another
part of our special alliance is NATO. Are you starting to get the picture here? Do we really want to be
connected with these people? With the five I's in NATO and now we want to have a
third organization that we are connected to with them? So if the US joins as an
associate member, and that's again yet to be defined, It could gain some modest trade and diplomatic perks. It could reinforce
the Anglo-Sphere ties and so forth. Full membership could transform the Commonwealth into a superpower
bloc, but it would risk internal friction because a lot of countries would not want
the U.S. dominating. But again, it's another Trump step towards
globalism, the guy who was supposed to be nationalistic, America first, and he wants
to get into a commonwealth with the King of England, especially this particular king.
But we've already seen him as part of the globalist operation when he did the lockdown.
So as this article says, he's got a track record of seeking grand headline grabbing
gestures to cement his legacy.
Things like the Abraham Accords or the border wall, except he didn't build the border wall.
There is no cement at the border wall.
There's no wall there. It's a gigantic door still. So he likes to position and posture himself as if
he's doing something big like that. And of course, he's got ties to that very expensive golf course
in Scotland and his mother was Scottish. It may just be about his own
personal ego. Now if you spell Doge backwards you get ego'd. Maybe that's what this is
all about. His gigantic, outsized ego. DG8, David you have to ask the real
questions. How much dirt does Epstein have on Trump and most of DC media in
Hollywood? How can anyone think King Sausage Fingers is a good man or our allies?
Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
I appreciate that.
He says, Trump fighting globalism by doing one globalist thingy at a time.
I'm glad you enjoyed that, grandbaby, but glad you're back, David.
No offense, guard.
Well, thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
StealthPatriot. We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. The The The Making Sense, Common Again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well I want to say thank you to the people who have sent us checks in the
third week of March. I want to read out the first name, the last initial. Stephanie K. David N. Jack H. Stacy P. William G. James F. Ronald C. Margaret
Mary T. Scott C. Aaron W. Walter and Joe A. and Nelson Vease, who's new. That's a very
generous contribution. I appreciate that, Nelson. Thank you very much. And thank you
all of you. That is what keeps us going. I've got a list of people who have sent us Zelen. I've not read that since the beginning
of the month, so we're going to read that coming up and thank those people. They are
the ones who keep the broadcast running. And just as a reminder, in terms of tips, Rumble
is okay now.
We had issues with Rumble and they had a lot of hitches in their payment.
They have to cut a check, you couldn't pull the money out and that type of thing.
But that's been solved.
They're doing that on a regular basis.
Now we're having issues with Rockfin in terms of being able to get money out.
They convert the money into a cryptocurrency, their own. And there have
been issues with … oh, and this is a Rockfin tip from David Strauss. Thank you very much,
I appreciate that. But let me just caution and say that we've been having trouble getting
our money out because there's just, you know, you have to have, in order to get the money
out of that cryptocurrency, there has to be buyers there.
And that is something of an issue.
We've also heard a tale of a guard and some other people being, having their channels
shut down.
And we have some emails about this as well.
But before we get into that, I wanted to talk about what several people have sent me things about how AI, people who
are driving for a living, whether it is with a bus or whether it was an ambulance, as handy
as talking about.
This is becoming a very common thing for AI to be monitoring and watching their driving.
And I think it's going to be putting pressure on them, obviously, and it's
already being done in a lot of different ways. This is from listener David who drives a bus.
He said, Gar did a great job as usual last week. Hope Karen and Whistler are recovering
and nephew Whistler is adorable. And I mentioned that because when Travis brought him in,
I had him here and had Travis' son here.
I don't like to use first names.
I still haven't talked to you about it yet whether or not you want his name used.
So I just assumed that you do not want his name used, just like Whistler.
So Whistler was doing the board and I'm looking at him and I'm thinking, should I mention
the baby's name?
That's why I said Whistler's nephew.
So we'll see what happens with that name.
But anyway, he said, I wrote a letter to you three years ago about how my employer was
going to give us the Amazon treatment by installing interior cameras to monitor how we drive our
buses.
It sounds like Handy's dealing with the same thing now.
And we got more information from Handy handy as a matter of fact. He said the system I'm
subject to generates considerable errors mostly with unfounded speeding claims.
Next thing he's gonna do is gonna report you to the cops if you get an automatic
ticket and then try to convince them that that was not correct. Anyway, seat belts and cell phone usage.
Getting false positives on all of that stuff. Managers have to spend hours each
day manually correcting the AI reports so that we are not penalized. The system
often confuses our use of the two-way radio system with using a phone while
we're driving. And all this is happening, of course, while this is what the device looks like.
As a matter of fact, this is, let's see, here it is right here, here's the bus monitor.
So you've got this big monitor there to distract you while you're driving.
I don't know if you have to interact with it.
It's got some buttons across the top there. Isn't it great how if they put a gigantic touchscreen display in front of you, that's
not distraction.
But if you have a cell phone, that is distraction.
I made that comment about Tesla for the longest time.
But anyway, that's what it looks like, the monitor system.
He said, �A hundred percent safety score for us is important not just for our reputation but because we are paid a two dollar an
hour safety bonus. Each infraction, if not corrected, is deducted from that bonus.
So again, if you use the the two-way radio system that they got built into the buses, it docks you for using the phone. It becomes the servants of technology. It's gone full circle. I've
talked about when I first got into engineering, it was such a pain in the
neck. We'd have to, whenever we had computer programs, we had to do punch cards and
that was constantly, they were constantly breaking down, there's always a line because they didn't have enough of these machines,
key punch machines. They had 16 of them and it was pretty consistent that a
quarter of them were broken at any given time. And they had an IBM guy who lived
there, very easily recognized in his white shirt and tie that he always wore 24-7-365
while he's fixing the key punch machines. So he had to use the card punch machines and
it was a real hassle. And everybody is waiting for this super expensive computer. Everybody's
queued up and waiting. Everybody is, you know, millions of dollars for this thing. And it
was, it was crazy was crazy that died did we
lose the laptop there we'll get it back in a second anyway moving on handy so
here's a memo I saw today regarding the new AI big brother that they installed
on our ambulances I have a sneaking suspicion that they're going to use the
driving data they're collecting to train driverless ambulances
eventually.
Oh, absolutely they will.
That's what it's going to be.
Big data.
They're collecting the data.
He says they will be right back.
Okay, so we won't take a quick break.
Something was going down, but we're back anyway.
So we'll continue.
He said, they've changed the company driving policies to be AI driver friendly.
For example, in the past, we would approach a busy intersection, this is an ambulance,
with our light and sirens, and we would slowly part the waters if there was
traffic.
We would approach the intersection, slow way down to clear the intersection of the cross
traffic, and then proceed with due regard.
Now they have new policies, that if we approach an intersection with a line of traffic, we
are made to shut off the lights and the siren, and wait until the traffic begins to move. Then turn on the lights and the siren and wait until the traffic begins to move.
Then turn on the lights and the siren again and proceed.
This is one of the hallmarks of these so-called self-driving cars.
They cannot negotiate a four-way stop, for example.
And I think you're absolutely right, Handy.
That is what they're doing with this thing.
So he says, what I doubt is that AI can do is weave through heavy traffic with lights and sirens.
We used to do it all the time. Just one example, but probably the craziest one.
Yeah, so people are going to be dying for AI and for the plans to roll it out,
because we've got to have it everywhere. It's got to be everywhere.
They've got to have to replace human drivers with AI,
and the AI is just going to set there in traffic.
It'll get confused as a matter of fact.
Here are the sheets that he's got.
And so this is to assuage their fears.
Things like, is the purpose of this recording video to embarrass me?
No, it's to replace you. It's to replace you. And then it has a lot of, you know, what
are the new AI triggered events? And it's looking for things like they're looking at
for the bus. You know, are your seat belts on? Are you, how is your driving? Are you
going too fast, too slow? This and that. are you using a cell phone seat belts buckled all of that stuff
Yeah, it's um
This is what they want to do to us and we got more about this in terms of what is happening
With AI and job replacements very quickly
this is from
Dave in South Carolina
He says how does one biblically justify?
Being opposed to all human and moral laws
enacted by such a government?î And I think when he did this, I think Gard was talking
about the Just War theory and principles, I guess we could say.
And he was referring to it as the myth of the just war. I have a different take
on it and I'll tell you what my take is on it. I said just already at the beginning of
this program, I say it all the time about the Constitution. The Constitution is not
a self-enforcing document, but it does show us whether or not they have legitimate authority.
And I think that that is the purpose of the just war principles as well. It shows us
whether or not the government has the legitimate authority. We all know that war is the lifeblood
of the state. As a matter of fact, it's one of the key reasons that people would organize together,
and to form a government is for mutual defense. but it still has to operate according to
moral principles if it's going to operate. And I'm not an anarchist. I would
say that in theory, in theory, we could have a moral government. As a matter of
fact, when you look at Romans 13, the thing that gets so many Christians turned into slaves, we have a lot of pastors who will say repeatedly,
well, Romans 13 says you obey the government. End of story. And that…no caveats about
anything. This was written when we had the worst part of the Roman emperors were persecuting
and killing Christians.
They said, you obey the government.
Well, it doesn't say that.
As a matter of fact, it says the government is there for your good.
The government is still to obey moral principles.
And if the government doesn't obey moral principles,
even if we didn't have a constitution,
if the government was acting immorally,
we not only have a no obligation to participate in that immorality, you know,
if the government tells you to, you've got people lined up at a ditch and the government
tells you to go up and shoot them in the head, are you going to obey the government because
of Romans 13?
No.
You're going to take that gun and you're going to shoot the guy who told you to shoot people
in the head.
I hope.
I hope you're going to shoot the guy who told you to shoot people in the head. I hope. I hope you're going to defend innocent life." I think that is morally justified in that particular
case. But, you know, we are not obligated to follow an immoral government. End of story.
And Romans 13 makes that clear. If you look at the language, when it talks about government
being an instrument for good.
Well, not if it's a government that is pursuing immoral evil ends.
And so we have to have discernment about that.
It's not a very simple, you know, all on or all off.
It's not a binary decision.
And I think that when we look, just as when we look at the Constitution, the Bill writes, if the people
who are running the government are going to ignore that contract that they swore to uphold,
then they have no authority.
And they have no moral authority.
They may have power, and they always do have power.
And so you have to use discernment as to whether you're going to resist it or whatever.
When you look at what they're doing and how they're running a war, for example, is this
a war that we even need to be involved in?
Are we the aggressors?
Are we acting preemptively before we were attacked?
Even if not, are we trying to end the war?
Is that our goal?
What is our goal in all this?
Are we trying to avoid harming civilians?
And all these things play into it.
And if we have an objective and we cannot achieve that objective, it is still immoral
to just throw bodies at it.
That's what we're seeing in Ukraine.
We're seeing in Israel.
We're seeing a war that just continues on and on and on,
where if they can't achieve their objective of eliminating Hamas, if that is their objective,
and they're just killing civilians, then it's no longer morally justified, even if they were
attacked first. So I think that it is important to look at the moral principles, I think that governments have to
obey moral principles as well. As Madison said, because men are not angels, we need government. But because government is composed of men, to paraphrase them, we have to have some kinds of
checks and balances, and they've gotten rid of those checks and balances. So I think that,
I think government in general is justified, but that doesn't mean that everything that it does is justified.
I think we need to take that as discernment on a case-by-case, issue-by-issue basis.
And I think the same principles apply in terms of trying to avoid harming innocent people,
in terms of breaking off an attack when you are no
longer defending your life or any innocent life. I think all those principles
apply the same as if somebody broke into your house. This is from For the Love of
the Road and thank you so much. He's the one who did the excellent coin here. This
is a really nice coin that he did for us. I really appreciate what Ryan did with
that and he also comes with a little plastic stand that we printed up here so that you can put it on display.
And I'm trying to get this thing back on now. It's not that hard to do. There we go.
Anyway, he has a couple of questions. He said this is the first I've heard of
Rock Van Canceling shows and taking donations. Maybe you should stop hassle with the tips is probably reason enough.
Hate to see you lose a platform, but you don't know what they're going to be doing.
Have you been in contact with anyone there to get their side of canceled shows and things
like that?
I have not.
Like I said, we've been gone last week and I need to talk to them,
find out what the status is.
Um, we have not had our show canceled.
Other people like guard have, he says, Rockfin is still allowing people to tip.
Uh, some of the shows that have been shut down, like guards show.
So I just tipped guards account, see if it would go through it.
It did.
And he said, they're taking money for accounts.
They're no longer active.
So we'll see what happens with that. But we need to be proactive with it. I don't know what has happened with their liquidity to allow us to get our money out of, again, you donate in dollars,
they change it over to a cryptocurrency. I think the rationale for
that beginning was they were fractionalizing things. They would give you
a commission when people signed up on your website to follow you, and then they
would give you people who you'll get the sign up bonus, but then they would
allocate what people would pay on a monthly basis, they would allocate
that to the people that they watched.
So they would fractionalize that.
So I guess that's perhaps the reason that they did it but we don't really have any
way of getting that cryptocurrency out of there right now.
I mentioned before that we have now activated DavidKnight.News to take you to our website, which is still
either one, either address will still work.
The DavidKnightShow.com or DavidKnight.News will work.
Jack Lawson is going to be joining us.
You know, we had a situation with Jack and his Civil Defense Manual, which is really
in demand and necessary right now. And the people who are running that for him,
let it run out without telling him.
Give him a warning that they're running out of inventory.
So he got caught flat-footed,
trying to get scheduled to get these things reprinted.
He's got them reprinted, he's got a new website.
The new website is jacklossombooks.com.
We're gonna have him on at the end of the week,
talk about his book as well and where you can find him. And then just real quickly, I thought
this is interesting. This is a listener in South Africa who wanted to know what
the name of the music is for the intro. He says, I love the classical music piece
you use as your intro to the broadcast. That is Liberty Fanfare from John Williams and it was for the
100th anniversary of the Statue of Liberty. And I see that some people in
France are saying they want their statue back. I don't know, we'll have to put a tax on it I
guess before we can send it back. Well we're gonna take a quick break and when we
come back we're going to take a look at more of this tech stuff.
So stay with us and we will be right back. The You're listening to the David Knight Show. You are committing thought crime.
Turn off this broadcast now. You are committing thought crime.
Turn off this broadcast now.
Commit thought crime.
I like that, Travis.
Travis put that bumper together.
It's got a Clyde Lewis kind of feel to it.
I like that.
Let's talk a little bit about what is happening with jobs and AI.
It's already attacking jobs everywhere.
We've just been talking about that with Driver's Handy said, this thing watches our eyes to
see if we are distracted.
Yeah, five eyes.
Five intelligence agencies, I guess.
But they spell it E-Y-E.
On Rumble, NightJ11 says, Hey David, I'm now an official David Knight coin holder.
Well, thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
Let me send one of those out to Australia.
And we put on, you have to to if it's going to another country
You got to fill out a form
For what you're sending to that country and so I put on their coin. They said you can't send coins to Australia
all right, we'll call it a commemorative medallion because it's really big and
They said yeah, that'll work. That'll be fun. We'll do that
Well, let's talk about what's happening with AI. More than a quarter of computer programming jobs
just vanished.
Remember, it's just a couple of years ago.
People were saying, learn to code.
Well, it turns out that learn to code
is not much of job security.
Computer programming ranks among the 10 hardest hit
occupations of 420 plus jobs for which we have data
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
It said Learning to Code was supposed to save millions of would-be liberal arts majors,
but today there are fewer programmers in the U.S. than at any point since 1980, a 45-year period in which America's total workforce has grown by about 75 percent. It is flatlined, actually declined, not even flatlined.
But then the real issue is in the main.
There's a difference between, and that's what the rest of the article is really about,
the differences in programmers versus software analysts, I guess is the way that I would
talk about it, but they're talking about software designers, so software developers. So they said that has not really made that
much of a difference. They said software designers, as they call it with the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
are paid about 30% more than programmers. Programmers would be the people who would
implement it. And this is just kind of like an introductory situation.
And so they're two different types of things.
So it's not all computer programming.
And they said if you stop and look at it
when you think about AI that is putting together code,
it is acting as a coder, as a programmer,
but it's still going to be the software designer
or the analyst who's going to meet with the company and decide what their needs
are, design the system, and then say, okay, now I need to have the code written to
implement this particular design. And so there is a huge difference, and it's
about, like I said, about a 30% difference in terms of pay with designers getting paid 30% more than the programmers.
But they said the Bureau of Labor Statistics defines programmers as human coding machines.
And so now we have artificial coding machines. Research from people in Northwestern University,
economists there found the job market effects of earlier generations of AI and machine learning to be quite muted, however. He said the tools make workers more efficient,
perhaps even redundant, but that same efficiency boost also causes a firm to grow and a growing
firm hires more workers. I don't think that's going to be the case, though. I've said this for the
longest time. A lot of
people said, well, you know, we had people who did this and then they, you know,
that industry changed and they replaced it with that. It's like, okay, I understand
that. And so, you know, they just changed over to another type of job. I said, but
we're talking about with the AI revolution when it comes and it's on us
now. I've been saying this for a decade. When the AI revolution comes, you're going to be doing this in
all different job descriptions. So this is going to be affecting people that are
at the top. This is going to be affecting people at the bottom at entry-level
positions. And it's going to be affecting every industry. And that's what we're
seeing here. So the first 10roads are going to be in the more
routine programming. The unemployment jump for programming really does look at
least partly like an early visible labor market effect of AI. Well that's because
that's what it is. They said a recent report from California AI outfit, Anthropic, and again, they have
their own chat bot.
It's called Claude.
And so they said in 2024 and 2025, as people were using Claude, they calculated that the
share of all queries used for tasks related to each of the more than 700 occupations,
they found that people using AI to perform the tasks usually
assigned to computer programmers did that more than
those of any other job.
So that has been the most natural fit to
this particular point.
In a majority of cases, 57% of the people were using AI to
augment their work rather than to automate it entirely. And that's a way to be used by the
software designers, analysts or whatever, they will use the AI to augment their work, but that
means that they're going to be replacing the human programmers. Usage tilts more towards augmentation,
which things like having the AI check your work, asking questions to teach you things, iterating on a piece of work rather than automation. AI is on balance. Use more as a tool
to help you with the work that you're doing rather than automating small chunks of it.
But that is also rapidly changing. Something called AI agents. And that is going to be the next big displacement disruptor, I should
say. Programmers may be more likely than software developers to have more of their
job replaced by generative AI, but the sharp decline cannot be attributed to
generative AI alone, they said. Well then what about lawyers? Forbes has an article
about will AI replace lawyers? And the answer to that is yes, in massive numbers.
I go back again to this, and it was about a decade ago, South Korea went through and
did industry by industry survey who was going to have their jobs replaced in terms of drivers
that we're just talking about.
They said, well, we think about 50% of the driving and
transportation jobs will be replaced, but when it comes to doctors and lawyers, 70%.
They were the highest. And of course, when you're talking about white-collar jobs,
you're looking at, you know, it's being natural for people who are using
computers all the time, people who are software designers and analysts, it would be quite natural for them to incorporate the computer into their
work. But in terms of lawyers and doctors, it's going to be a massive displacement as well.
They think it would be even more so than some of these jobs. Again, because it is very much like
what you're seeing with chat GPT, these chat bots
going through and researching a lot of documents, that is something that AI could do better
than driving an ambulance through heavy traffic or through an intersection.
And so you're going to have a lot more displacement with that.
Over the past few years, a growing number of legal professionals have embraced AI tools
to boost efficiency and reduce costs.
Nearly 73% of legal experts now plan to incorporate AI into their daily operations.
65% of law firms agree that, quote, effective use of generative AI will separate the successful
and the unsuccessful law firms in the next five years.
So the bottom line is they haven't done it yet, but they're about to do it.
They're going to do it in terms of, well, I've got to do it in
order to survive. So the AI powered legal startups, and the
funding for them reached new record highs in 2024, total
capital investment of 477 million, half a billion dollars
$477 million, half a billion dollars invested in AI to be used for legal work. They said the appeal for venture capitalists is the potential that 44% of legal work could
potentially be automated using emerging AI tools.
Again, this is going to be paralegals, just like the programmers.
This is the way that this is going to roll out, I'm sure, especially at the beginning.
They said the investment frenzy that saw 58 funded deals in 2024 to bring AI automation
to speed up contract analysis, document summarization, case research means a shift away from the
slow traditional methods that have defined
the legal industry for decades, saving four hours per week and the opportunity to increase
annual billable time per lawyer by $100,000.
We also see AI is bringing something of a revolution in weather forecasting as well.
Isn't that interesting? How many times have I talked about the American Meteorological
Society? They're meeting in Austin. It was in 2013, I think. And, you know, I went there
to report on it and the fact that everybody was struggling with models. They
all had computer models and unlike climate prediction with weather
they could test to see whether or not their models worked. With climate
prediction they're predicting stuff that is decades out so you just take their
word for it and they trade on their reputation and their credentials. Trust
me, I am science. The whole Fauci routine. That's the way
the climate people were working. The people who were doing actual
meteorological work, they were coming up with all these different models and there
were literally hundreds of them on the floor. You had dozens of people that were
doing presentations. I attended some of those, but everybody had a model and
everybody was playing with it and nobody really was getting it right. Now they've got new AI prediction model that
is tens of times better than the current system they say. The new model is called
aardvark weather. I guess they want to get first in the phone book. aardvark.
Could have called it triple a weather right? It replaces the supercomputers and
the human experts used by forecasting agencies
with a single AI model they can run on a standard desktop computer. It turns a multi-stage process
that takes hours to generate a forecast into a prediction model that takes just seconds.
And then of course it can also produce the person, you know AI generated instead of the weatherman, and can create
all the graphics for you without having somebody there at the green screen, like Bill Murray
on Groundhog Day or whatever.
This is a real issue.
And again, all of these billionaires understand this, and this is why they are coming together
with the Trump administration to push this technocracy through.
From Bloomberg to Musk, and they were not on opposite sides in the last election of
2020 when Bloomberg was running. He said the smart ones of us are figuring out how we're gonna replace everybody else's jobs
We just got to figure out how we're gonna keep them from coming after us with guillotines and we'll do that with universal basic income
And everybody looked at what he said and they said well, he's calling farmers and factory workers stupid
Well, yes, he was but that's not the point. They're coming for everybody
everybody Well, yes he was, but that's not the point. They're coming for everybody. Everybody.
So, tests of the Aardvark model reveal that it's able to outperform the U.S. national
GFS forecasting system using just 10% of the input data leading researchers to say that
it could offer a revolution in forecasting.
Question is, are you going to believe the AI when it tells you that the sky is falling,
and it comes up with the next chicken little climate issue?
I, for one, am not.
That's the danger of all this stuff.
That's the other danger.
Besides taking our jobs and making sure that we own nothing and they put us on a welfare
thing to pacify us, besides
that, besides the surveillance, besides the control, there is the propaganda, the lies,
and that is really concerning.
Now I said before that there's a new part of AI that's coming out, an AI agent, and
that is, they don't really talk about that much in this story about the robot dog
that learns.
This is a Swedish AI startup company that's created a robot dog that is capable of learning
and adapting like animals to make certain decisions and to follow specific goals.
That's what an AI agent does. You give it generalized goals and it can work out how
it's going to achieve those goals. So what we're talking about here is an AI agent that
is controlling a robotic dog. And how long does it take before that dog turns into the
Terminator? We all love dogs and they're nice and friendly and, you know, they're down low and everything,
but they're putting machine guns on the dogs and it won't be long before these two-legged
robots that they've got doing somersaults and all the rest of this stuff have been given
a goal and they're going to then use the AI agent approach to execute that goal,
which might mean executing you.
The Swedish AI startup is called Intuosel.
Well, Nvidia's CEO is saying the humanoid robot revolution
is even closer than you think.
This is Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
He says it's less than five years away.
Last Tuesday he gave a keynote address in front of a packed hockey stadium during the
nearly three trillion dollar company's annual developer conference in San Jose, California.
He said he was asked what signs would show that AI had become ubiquitous.
He said it may be when literally
humanoid robots are wandering around, which is not five years away. This is not
a five years away problem. This is a few years away problem. So I'll be here before
2030. Isn't that nice? 2030 has been the focus for these people, for them to have their new society in, that
doesn't need us, doesn't want us, and seeks to control us.
He said the value of it is very, very easy to determine.
He said the going rate for renting a human robot is probably going to be $100,000.
I'm assuming that's per year.
He says, and I think that's going to be pretty good economics.
So he's talking about using it primarily initially in manufacturing.
Apple is looking at including cameras in their future AI and future Apple watch models.
And they want to put the cameras in there because again, it's going to be part of the
AI push.
Remember we're talking about handy. And we're talking about David,
the buses and the ambulances and the AIs with the cameras watching you, watching the road,
putting all this stuff together. And so now we get the watches as well. And we'll all
be data generators for these people, generating this is why TikTok and all these other things are so important for them because it's big compute.
They want to be able to watch humans to learn from humans.
How creepy is that? I think it's pretty creepy.
You know, I used to really love technology. That's what I got into engineering.
I absolutely loathe these people now.
There's the same reason I would not go into the military industrial complex
because I didn't like the way they were using the technology. Now, there's the same reason I would not go into the military industrial complex, because
I didn't like the way they were using the technology.
Now, I don't like the way they're using any of the technology.
Why?
Because all the technology is being driven by the government.
And again, as we said before, war is the lifeblood of the state, and the state is going to go
to war with us.
It's already at war with us in many different ways.
It's going to be escalating that much more.
And a move to position the Apple Watch
as more of an AI wearable.
Multiple versions of future AI watch models
that include cameras that will help the device
see the outside world.
Well, isn't that special?
I actually, when I was at Infowars,
we had like little spy devices, cameras.
We had a wristwatch that had a camera in it.
We had glasses that had a camera in it.
Of course, the glasses didn't really
look that real, unfortunately.
So you could steer them and use them to record video.
But it really wasn't...
It didn't look real and you could figure out that it had a camera in it.
The watch, though, you couldn't see it, but the watch was impossible to aim.
I practiced and practiced and practiced it and I went to a book signing where Hillary Clinton was.
I could not get her in the frame to save my life.
So, I don't know, it's just the AI watch from Apple is just going to be watching and monitoring
everything and just fitting it back into all of this.
And so into all of this, the New York Times has now done yet another article about Ted
Kaczynski.
He's having a bit of a moment
because people are starting to see that his vision of where this is all headed was actually
pretty spot on. His solution however was not. I'm not I you know you have to make the distinction
between his approach to what of course he goes out there and he identifies key technologies and
key people who are setting those technologies up.
He basically did what the Terminator did.
I don't know which one came first.
He wrote his treatise in July 1995.
So he might have been following Sarah Connor's approach.
You know, she's going gonna take out the guy who
developed the seminal chip and things like that, because that came out, the
first Terminator came out in 1986, and the second one was in the late 80s, so it
might have been that he got that idea from watching the Terminator. I haven't
seen anybody say that that was the case, But he committed suicide, was it two years ago I
think? He was in prison in North Carolina. This article from the New York Times
says that several years ago James R. Fitzgerald, a retired FBI agent, found
himself re-reading an abstruse tract of political philosophy called
industrial society and its future. That
was what Ted Kaczynski wrote, the former math professor at the University of
California. The FBI agent Fitzgerald first encountered Kaczynski's treatise in
July 1995, shortly after Kaczynski anonymously mailed the typewritten
manuscript to the Times and the Washington Post demanding its publication
in exchange for his promise to stop killing people with package bombs. typewritten manuscript to The Times and The Washington Post demanding its publication
in exchange for his promise to stop killing people with package bombs.
Fitzgerald's photocopy of the original was dog-eared and marked up with color-coded annotations
that he made while trying to discern clues to the identity of the author, who was then
known only as the Unabomber.
And of course it was his brother who when he saw the manifesto said, wait a minute,
that's my brother talking.
Because I'm sure that he had said, and he had a pretty unique take on things.
There weren't that many people that were saying that at that time.
But the FBI agent says, to this day, I have no particular sympathy for the author, but
there have always been passages in Kaczynski's
indictment of technological civilization that gave him pause.
He said, boy, I really don't disagree with this comment, he recalled thinking.
And I don't really disagree with this statement, but he's a killer and we got to catch him.
Fitzgerald recited one of Kaczynski's numbered paragraphs, 173, which had been on his mind
in light of AI's rapid advance.
Kaczynski wrote, If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we can't
make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible to guess how such machines
might behave.
Paragraph 92.
Fitzgerald remembered and reconsidered amid the COVID-19 vaccine mandates of which she
was personally skeptical, quote, this is from Kaczynski, this science marches on blindly,
thus science marches on blindly without regard to the real welfare of the human race or to
any other standard, obedient only to the psychological needs of the scientists and the government
officials and corporation executives who provide the funds for research.
I've said many times that Hugo de Garris' book, here it is, it's out of print now.
I have a pristine copy of it.
It's not dog-eared, but it does have little tabs in it,
because I've read it a lot.
The Art of War by Hugo de Gares.
He's a researcher in artificial intelligence
and this very thing.
He said he would ask one scientific group after the other,
if you knew that you were going to create something, AI, that was going to destroy humanity,
would you do it?
And he said they always would say yes.
They would always say yes.
This is one of the things I saw in technology.
One of the things I saw was the military industrial complex.
People really didn't care what it was that they were making.
It was just a puzzle to them.
Now of course people like Fauci have got a different agenda, but the people who are actually doing the work and creating the stuff, it becomes an intellectual puzzle to them
and becomes something of an ego thing to them as well when they look at it and say, well,
you know, this might wind up just killing everybody, but let's do it anyway.
We saw that with the atomic bomb.
They didn't know if they were going to light the atmosphere on fire in a chain reaction
that would destroy the earth, but they did it anyway.
And so it was interesting.
Hugo de Gares said the only time it was at a conference that I was speaking at, it was
a Christian conference, and he asked the audience that same question.
And that was the first time that an audience, and it was an overwhelming no, came back.
First time. You see, all these problems are downstream from spiritual issues.
Culture is downstream from the spiritual, and the politics is downstream from cultural.
And this is especially true with this. This is one of the reasons
why this stuff is happening. It's because we've lost our way morally and spiritually.
Anyway, yeah, the, there is no standard. They don't care about the welfare of the human
race. They're obedient only to the psychological needs of the scientists the egos or the money desire
We see this throughout science. We see this throughout big pharmaceutical companies rest of it
we see this especially throughout the government with their wars and
Fixed Earl said to himself. He said you know what old Ted was maybe on to something here
himself and said, you know what, old Ted was maybe on to something here. New York Times says online there is a name for this called Tedpilling.
Instead of redpilling, Tedpilling.
They actually refer to people who write about it on Reddit and other places.
Call them Uncle Ted.
Uncle Ted.
To be Tedpilled means to read paragraph one of Kaczynski's manifesto, its assertions
that the mad dash of technological advance since the industrial revolution has made life
unfulfilling, quote unquote, made life unfulfilling.
We can really see that now, can't we, with AI.
The mad dash to that and how unfulfilling it's going to be when everything we do, if
we have a job, it's going to be AI watching our every move and breathing down our neck.
Paragraph 156 says, new technology tends to change society in such a way that it becomes
difficult or impossible for an individual to function without using that technology. To read paragraph 174's warning of a
near future in which human work will no longer be necessary and the masses will
be superfluous. Again, he wrote this stuff back in the 1980s, 40 years ago. Most of
the Ted Pilled stopped well short of Luigi Mangione, the guy who shot the insurance executive in
the head, but he was a big fan of Ted Kaczynski, of Uncle Ted.
He was Ted Pilled.
He actually gave the manifesto a four-star rating and said, quote, it's simply impossible
to ignore how prescient many of his predictions about modern society turned out.
Well, you can understand that and
still not support his violence.
He killed three people he permanently disfigured 23 or more or crippled for life.
But how does that compare with what Fauci has done, Gates
has done, what they are about to do? Kaczynski's 2023 death by suicide in a
federal prison in North Carolina. That was at that point in time. He had mailed
out, as a matter of fact, he began mailing these things out.
They said in a world that was very, very different from what we have today. He mailed off his
manifesto two months before the IPO of Netscape, the first browser, and what were for many Americans as the New Times, the last days of the pre-Internet
era.
Thirty years later, we occupy a disorienting moment when the visions of techno-optimists
and techno-pessimists alike seem on the verge of realization, when a miraculous future and
a dystopian one seem at once within our reach and also beyond our control."
And so they said, you know, when all this stuff happened, mid-90s, you know, it was
– he was arrested about a year after Timothy McVeigh.
As the New York Times said, they had conservatives who had taken a lot of heat.
Everybody was blaming the conservative movement for what Timothy McVeigh did.
I think he was a government agent. But they were blaming him for
that. And again, it wasn't what it appeared to be by any means at all.
That was, but I won't get into the Oklahoma City bombing. But there had been a
lot of attacks on conservatives. And so people like Rush Limbaugh and Cal Thomas said well this guy is coming from the left. He taught at
Berkeley and
He looks like an academic
He sounds like a left-wing nut. He is all pro-environmentalist and all the rest of this stuff
So they said Rush Limbaugh called him a left-wing nut. Kyle Thomas said, now that one of their own
has been implicated in the horrid deed of bombs by mail,
what are they going to do about it?
They've been talking about radical extremism.
But as New York Times points out,
he really kind of defied pigeonholing.
Yes, he did have a lot of leftist stuff
about the environment and other things like that in it.
But he was really one of the reasons why
he is moving forward. He really was outside of this left-right paradigm.
He said
He wrote you can't get rid of the bad parts of technology and only retain the good parts.
He said it'd be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the consequences.�
I think I'm Ted Pilled as well.
What distinguished him was his conviction that technological society needed to be demolished
as quickly as possible.
But he said with violence, which I don't agree with.
This earned him acolytes from a lot of people across the spectrum of violence
who are always looking for rationale to commit violence. But he, besides anarchists and neo-Nazis,
the people who looked the most at his book were the people who were technologists said New York Times. Ray Kurzweil, the guy
who is part of the singularities connected with Peter Thiel and Google
and all the rest of these people and he is I guess one of these he would be a
techno optimist. He was Hugo de Gares would talk about him he said Hugo would
talk about what was going to be possible negative consequences.
Kurzweil was always about the Pollyanna positive attitude.
But Kurzweil said, I was surprised at how much Kaczynski's manifesto I agreed with,
even though he's a techno-optimist.
In Kurzweil's 1999 book, and this tells you where he's coming from, The Age of Spiritual
Machines.
That's what Kurzweil wrote about.
He said, when he showed Bill Joy, the co-founder of Sun Microsystems, a passage from the Manifesto
on the Future of Artificial Intelligence, Joy found himself troubled.
He later wrote, as difficult as it is for me to acknowledge, I saw some merit in the
reasoning in this simple passage."
So the techno-optimists shared Kaczynski's view that technology was not a series of innovations,
says New York Times, but it was really what technology was about was a holistic,
self-perpetuating machine. They agreed whether they were optimists or pessimists.
They agreed that the near future would be one in which human existence was ruled by
a system that humans did not control.
Technology for Technology's Sake
It's not surprising that broader interest in Kaczynski began to take upward in the early
2010s as the average person's daily experience of technology shifted from discrete tools and entertainment devices
to near-constant participation in powerful, inescapable networks.
Kaczynski's vision of species-wide rebellion against our own creations was far-fetched
in 1995, but in 2025, even his personal retreat from technological
society seems practically impossible.
The robots will be everywhere soon enough, and only the people who build them can afford
to buy land in Montana these days, writes the New York Times.
The sense that there was no escape from technology and its consequences has fostered the very loose, very online ethos known as Doomerism, an irony-mediated marriage of nihilism and
utopianism in which the apocalypse is inescapable but the possibilities on the other side of
it are vast, unencumbered by the constraints and the cramped imaginations of politics as
we've known them.
And you need to understand this because this is the perspective of the people who have now bought Trump and
are now in control of our government. You need to understand where they want to go,
what their mindset is when you look at their idea of the singularity of living
forever with technology and so forth and so on. And their other contempt for the rest of humanity.
We have seen what they have at their disposal is technology like no dictator or tyrant has
ever had at their disposal.
And their contempt for humanity is unmatched except by the kinds of people that ran the Roman Empire. Nero,
Domitian, and other people like that. So the sense that there is no escape from
this is a Dumerism. Kaczynski's manifesto is less a blueprint for resistance that
he hoped it would be than a theoretical framework for understanding the
dystopia that we now must figure out how to live in and how we got here, or
how you need to prepare against it.
Again, it is technology for technology's sake.
And I'll just say this as well.
It's interesting to see even churches embracing aspects of AI.
As a de-babilizer, remember that from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy? Where you could instantly translate
any language and you could hear it. And so
this is from a Christian
website. They're talking about the fact that this church has
got a lot of people who are
well the drummer, the worship band, doesn't speak any English
at all.
But now with this new app, and guess what the app is called?
Worldly.
Worldly.
It's telegraphing it, isn't it?
Because you go back and you look at the Tower of Babel.
What was the issue with that?
Well, rather than be fruitful and multiply and spread out all over the earth, we're going
to concentrate ourselves into the city. We're going to concentrate power,
and we're going to concentrate our population, and we're going to be under the rule of a
charismatic leader, and we're going to do all these things. And that was when God confused their languages. And now that's all being undone.
You know, it was undone at Pentecost, wasn't it? Everybody heard the apostles speaking
in their own language. The first de-Babylizer was right there. And so that was, in essence, part of a reversal of the curse of the pride and the contempt
for God that was there.
And it really is, you know, being unified is a good thing.
It would be a good thing.
But not with the way that human nature is.
Human nature as it is right now, if we have a world government, it's going to be
a horrific thing. And the more power is concentrated into the hands of a few,
it's more of a horrific thing. It has to be mediated by people who have been
transformed by Christ. Otherwise it's going to be really awful. And I don't
mean that they are going to set up some kind of a theocracy either.
No, it's about the kingdom of God is within you. Because he wanted this guy, this drummer, and other non-English speaking people in the congregation to be able to better hear and
understand the service, he went for a translation solution about a year ago when he stumbled upon Worldly, an AI startup founded in 2017.
And so the church has now gone worldly.
They kind of reverse the curse here.
It does about 60 different languages that are there.
And look, that's fine if you want to translate the Gospel into other things, but here's the
danger.
The danger is that you come to see it
as this all-powerful guy. If it's a tool, fine. But don't look at it as anything other than a tool.
Don't believe it when it talks to you. If it can accurately predict the weather, fine. Good. Use
it as a tool for that. Still don't believe it when it tries to tell you about climate because
it doesn't have the data to make that analysis. And we're gonna talk more
about this when we come back. I'll just leave you with this. Here's the danger,
right? Simply he's got some people in his church that don't speak English and so
he's going to use this AI translator. But here's a group here how AI is helping to
further the gospel. This person says we're living in Pentecost.
But it's not Pentecost.
It's not God.
It's an imitation of God.
When Musk comes out and says, I'm going to let blind people see it, and lame people walk,
and now we're going to reverse the curse of multiple languages and all the rest of this
stuff.
You see where this is headed, don't you?
It's headed into a fake imitation of God. And that is a very dangerous thing. And this other article, this
person says, we are living in Pentecost for the first time since Pentecost and really
going back to the Tower of Babel, languages have been a barrier. And so this is a miracle.
The only reason that the global church was able to gather for the first time is because of that technology.
And I heard this when you had people like Al Mohler, people like Robert Jeffries, and
all these people who now gather around Trump and let Paula White lead them in prayer for
Trump and for prosperity and all the rest of their—whatever they're praying for.
People like Al Mohler, Robert Jeffries were saying that the mRNA Trump shot was a miracle.
It was a moonshot.
It was like, well, I agree with the moonshot aspect.
But they're pushing it.
So this is great.
You know, this is from God calling it a miracle and worshiping it and harming people.
It is a fake Pentecost.
It is an imitation of God.
And we need to have the discernment to understand that.
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Here's a little song I wrote You might want to hear it in your pot
You'll owe nothing and be happy
Ain't got no cash, ain't got no car But 24 booster shots in your arm
Oh nothing, be happy You can't even buy s**t in the store
Because of your low social credit score Oh nothing. Be happy.
You will own nothing.
And be happy.
Be happy and eat the bugs.
They're doing what in the place they named after me?
Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traders
Making sense common again. This is the David Knight show
Hello, it's me Volodymyr Zelensky
I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years. You'd think with all the billions, I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
And I could, if only David Knight would send me
one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies
or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
But he told me to get lost.
Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some
at the davidknightshow.com. You should beers can buy me some at the David Knight Show dot com.
You should be able to buy me several hundred.
Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
Well let's talk about the EU crane. As we look at the application of technology there,
Look at the application of technology there. We see that drones have really taken a big toll on
traditional very complex very expensive
Equipment like the state-of-the-art tanks and other things like that. We have something that's been developed by Ukraine They call it a fury battle bot. That's their name for it in Ukrainian
If you look at it looks kind of like a primitive Dalek from Doctor Who, I guess.
Exterminate!
That's what they're looking to do.
Ukraine's military leadership announced on Tuesday that it is deploying machine gun-equipped
robots to the front line.
Now these are not being run by AI.
They're not autonomous killer robots.
These are
remotely controlled, line of sight. So they've got somebody who has, it's not a
wire course, it's wireless, but it has to be line of sight and it's only got a
range of about two kilometers, about 1.2 miles. And with that they can drive it
and they can fire the gun. Ukraine launched this effort.
Also as they're launching this, because they don't have enough personnel, as they're adapting
to all this stuff, they also are trying to recruit more soldiers, especially the younger
ones, 18 to 24 years old and they have a new recruitment ad which has to be seen in order to be believed.
This is what they're telling people.
They're going to give them a $24,000 bonus but they've got to break this down so that
the 18 to 24 year olds can understand it, something that they want.
So what they do is they talk about it in terms of McDonald's cheeseburgers
I'll translate. How many cheeseburgers can be bought for $24,000?
Yes, this is definitely the question from the administrative defense. Let's go figure it out
He said a single cheeseburger is only $1.55 in Ukraine
So you can get $,600.5.
Yeah, gotta eat that cheeseburger.
If you wanna become a soldier and defend Ukraine,
hey, it comes with a bonus of a cheeseburger.
I love the way he says cheeseburger, cheeseburger,
cheeseburger.
Reminds me very much of what we had with Saturday Night Live.
And that was the guys, remember, they had.
And it was actually a real place.
I've actually been there.
Karen and I were in Chicago, and we went to the place where they take your orders and, Cheeburger, Cheeburger. That's why he says that as well.
No Coke, Pepsi, right? And just barking orders at people and hurrying them up. Hurry up, hurry up,
you know, give me your order. All right now. That's the way that place really is. It's kind
of legendary there in Chicago. But yeah, you can get a lot of Cheeburgers there as well. So
You can get a lot of Cheeburgers there as well. So the military is trying to recruit people by giving them a bonus and explaining to them
what that bonus is worth in cheeseburgers.
Because it may be, since they're connected to the US government, maybe they have a currency
that is declining in value as well.
Men's controversy and backlash unleashed in Ukraine after the country's defense ministry
decided to make a fresh recruitment video on TikTok, bizarrely using the lure of McDonald's.
Desperately seeking to gain more young recruits and the army's depleting ranks, also at a
moment the disturbing video showed conscription officers yanking Ukrainian men off the streets
and shoving them into vans. Remember that? I played clips of that.
Great escape. You know, they caught these guys. Gonna recruit them. They said
Ukrainians, they're now telling Ukrainians how many Cheeburgers they can
get at a McDonald's for fighting Russia. That's not a great idea. One person said, imagine getting yourself shot in the trenches for a happy meal.
And some of the people, and yet here we are in America, you
don't want to talk about Cheeburgers. As I said at the
beginning of the program, we have DoorDash now doing micro
loans to people to buy hamburgers and tacos and that type of thing.
One person responded to that and said, well, why stop with just the hamburgers and doing
micro loans?
Hear me out.
A single contract for a burrito is incredibly risky.
Anyone willing to pay for a burrito in installments can't be trusted to pay their debt.
But what if we pooled the payments together,
the risk would go away entirely.
Which is basically what they did with the...
You're going to invest in some subprime prime rib.
That's good, subprime prime rib, yeah.
That's what they do with subprime mortgages.
So you know, if you've got a whole bunch of really untrustworthy people who can't pay
back their loan for their hamburger, you know, like Wimpy or something, you put all the Wimpies
together into some kind of a financial instrument, now suddenly all the risk goes away.
And as DoorDash is selling this, DoorDash and Klarna have signed a deal where customers can choose to
pay for food deliveries with interest-free installments. Or you can pay for it in a long
installment with interest. So when they push this out, DoorDash is using words like empower,
freedom, flexibility.
That's how they're selling this to people.
Yeah, it's really empowering to go into debt, isn't it?
You feel the freedom of debt slavery?
It's everywhere there.
Well, anyway, this campaign is also trying to sell them things like mortgage subsidies
and free college education.
But I imagine people who think that far ahead are probably not interested in laying their life down for
this war so they go for the hamburger approach McDonald's that's gonna be able
to sign up meanwhile back of this drone thing that doesn't look too effective
now I think it's very important when you look at asymmetric warfare when you look
at the drones they've been, very effective taking out these tanks
that cost $10 million and things like that. And asymmetric warfare is a very, very important
thing and it's going to be happening. But when you look at this, this is a battery operated
drone, they call it a drone, it a you know on the ground it's got a
battery life of up to 72 hours and range of up to 20 kilometers a driving time of
up to three hours this is the lunacy of putting electric vehicles on the
battlefield it really is stupid but I think what is even dumber than that is what President
Trump has done, is proposing to do, with this new, incredibly expensive, $20 billion futuristic
fighter jet, the F-47.
The F-47 will be the most advanced, most capable, most lethal aircraft ever built.
An experimental version of the plane has secretly been flying for almost five years, and we're
confident that it massively overpowers the capabilities of any other nation.
There's no other nation.
We know every other plane.
I've seen every one of them.
And it's not even close.
This is at next level.
You know, level five is good. This is level six.
Next level expense.
The F-47 is equipped with state-of-the-art stealth technology.
It's virtually unseeable and unprecedented power.
It's got the most power of any jet of its kind ever made.
Maneuverability,ability likewise is the there's
never been anything like it despite the power and speed its speed is top over
two which is something that you don't hear very often it's over two America's
enemies will whatever to it coming hopefully we won't have to use it for
that purpose but you have to have it and I have it it coming. Hopefully we won't have to use it for that purpose, but you have to have it.
Gotta have it.
It's huge.
If it ever happens, they won't know what the hell hit them.
It's huge.
It's big.
The F-47.
Well, again, we keep going big and expensive.
Why?
Because that's what the military industrial complex wants.
Big and expensive is not necessarily the way to go. As a matter of fact, you know, when we look at the current military industrial complex,
this is a contract that was won by Boeing.
Boeing, aren't they the ones who stranded those astronauts for almost a year with their
leaky spaceship that they have?
Yeah, it's a...
How did they win a competitive contract?
Who knows?
As a matter of fact, they said the president insisted that the generals came up with this Yeah, it's a, how did they win a competitive contract? Who knows?
As a matter of fact, they said the president insisted that the generals came
up with this name, which is a nod to him being the 47th president.
I guess the F stands for the grade that he gets for being president, or maybe
it's the grade that Boeing gets for their designs as they've got planes that
are falling apart, spaceships that are falling apart.
Now we're going to spend $20 billion on this plane.
Now that's not per plane, but those days are not far away where they will be spending $20
billion per plane.
But this is how bloated and out of touch the military industrial complex is.
Keep making more and more expensive, more and more complex machines.
And yet, when we see what happens on the battlefield, an asymmetric war, they continue to lose these
wars on the ground.
And I think an interesting book, I've mentioned this before, Daniel Suarez wrote a book called
Kill Decision, and it's about this very thing.
It was about swarms of drones, and it's very interesting how the thing unfolds, but basically
some of the companies that are going to survive are going, it's going to be a complete restructuring
of the military industrial complex, different companies that are going to be there.
It's going to be companies like Lucky Palmer's company are really going to be the important
ones as opposed to Boeing.
Boeing is going to build it and the same people did Starliner and had everybody, these two
astronauts lost in space for such
a long time.
The way the White Trump said in his announcement, after a rigorous and thorough competition,
it went to Boeing.
Okay.
Well, meanwhile, in Germany, we have the voice from Russia that CH says the leader of Germany calls him the new
Fuhrer of Germany his name is Fred Mertz they say Friedrich Friedrich you know
like in Frankenstein Frankenstein whatever but this is not the Fred Mertz
from I Love Lucy because he would have some splaining
to do if he did this kind of stuff.
But this Fred Mertz, as he points out, after more than 80 years, Germany once again has
a Fuhrer who is in no way inferior to the old one in terms of mendacity and megalomania,
while spending sums that are unimaginable for most people, certainly for the Germans.
The Germans were very tight-fisted with this money in the past.
We do the math while our optimism withers.
He said, this has never happened before.
We've got a man who has not even been elected chancellor, yet he negotiates the biggest borrowing
in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany with parties that lost the election and a Bundestag that
has long since been disassociated said if you describe Fred Mertz's current
behavior to a German ten years ago they would have told you that you're insane
but this Fred Mertz who refuses to form a coalition with the AFD because he
accuses them of right-wing extremism
is preparing Germany for war against Russia. So what does right-wing extremism
mean anymore? The AFD wants peace with Russia. Russia seeks peace. The Americans
want peace, but Fred Mertz opposes all those who seek peace. They are saying
that 1.7 trillion dollars could be spent in this defense buildup.
And that is what we're seeing in Ukraine.
Uh, Handy said, uh, we can't have a debabilizer AI on the ambulance
to assist with language barriers.
No, we get a digital overlord to constantly scrutinize and tattle on us.
On rumble, DG8 says, David can Trump speak without bragging and using 15
adjectives to describe anything he does?
Evidently not.
Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Oh You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well welcome back and I want to thank the people who have contributed to us on Zelle.
I mentioned the people who had sent in checks earlier in the program.
Again if you want to know how to support the program or if you want to know where to find the program in various formats, if you're watching it now in one format, you'd like to listen to, let's say, the audio podcast because you're watching it maybe now in a video format or watching it live. You can find all those links at now David Knight dot news same website the old
The old address will take you there as well
But that David Knight dot news you can also find out how you can support us
we have the information as to
our PO box as well as
Zell connections cash app other things like that, but I want to thank the people on
Zell who have support us going back to the beginning of the month, Austin M. Thank you very much.
Kevin M. Michael L. William Daniel W. Maurice W. Adam D. Michael P. Rogelio J. William R.
Julie W. Kelly K. Kimberly M, Ralph M, Matthew S,
we'll get the next page here, Susan L, William R,
Sean S, Julie W, Susan L again, Robert F.B., William R,
Mary Ellen, Gretchen C, Kenneth C, Wayne H, Benjamin R, Lois I, Susan L, again, David S, Sally D, Susan L, William R, Linda M,
Marcos V, Julie W, Manny D, Mitchell P, and that is up to this morning. So that's for the month of March.
Thank you all very much and appreciate that.
We're a bit light this month because the golf last week,
but we really do appreciate your support.
And especially see many of the same people each month there.
I want to talk a little bit about Snow White,
which I think got released on Fridays,
either released last Friday or coming up this Friday.
I think it was released last Friday, was it?
I don't know.
I have no intention of going to it, but I think it was kind of interesting to see Greg
Laurie's take on this.
Now, a lot of people know Greg Laurie.
They just did a movie about his mentor, and Greg Laurie character was in there as well.
He's got a large church out in California.
But he says that this Snow White lacks the moral clarity of the classic 1937 film.
And I thought, well, moral clarity, that's kind of interesting, because one of the things
in terms of the moral clarity of Disney especially but all of Hollywood
Has always been follow your heart
And yet we understand as Christians that the heart is desperately wicked
It's not a good guide
Necessarily, right? You don't want to violate your conscience, but your conscience is not necessarily a sufficient guide
but your conscience is not necessarily a sufficient guide. You should never violate it, but you know, always let your conscience be your guide," said
Jiminy Cricket to Pinocchio. So there's always that, and that is a
constant theme out of Hollywood, and you should be aware of that because that is
really what they're selling. But he had some good points here. He said the 1937 film,
of course it was officially titled Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, was Hollywood's first feature
length animated movie. It was widely, I mean it really moved Disney up on the map. I think they
gave him like seven little miniature Oscars or something like that, you know when he won it for animated film the original story said Greg Laurie is a moral fable and it has biblical parallels and
Let me play for you what he had to say. Snow White is a moral fable
It's a story about good versus evil written by the Grimm brothers a tale about a vain queen
So obsessed with her own beauty
and status she's willing to murder an innocent girl just to remain the fairest in the land.
Sound familiar? That's basically the story that we read about in the Bible about Lucifer,
a once high-ranking powerful angel who wanted to take the place of God with himself.
The problem with Lucifer is he was in love with his own image.
He wanted to be in the place of God.
So how does this story end?
Well, evil is defeated and the Queen in all of her vanity meets her ruin,
and Snow White is resurrected from her death-like sleep, saved by the Prince.
And what does she sing?
Someday my prince will come.
Which if we're being honest,
is not all that different from a Christian worldview.
The original Snow White carried the message
that one day the prince would come,
the true prince, the one who raises the dead
and defeats evil once and for all.
But the new Snow White? No, we can't have that.
Zegler along with the film's producers proudly declared that Snow White wouldn't be waiting for
true love. Instead she would be dreaming of becoming a fearless leader.
Fearless leader of what exactly?
She refused to sing Someday My Prince Will Come,
the signature song of the original film,
dismissing it as, again, weird.
Instead, she's got a new song waiting on a wish,
a song about, you guessed it,
female empowerment and self-sufficiency.
Because heaven forbid,
we acknowledge the timeless human desire for love, redemption, and rescue.
By the way, Disney has sunk $270 million into this movie, hoping audiences will embrace this new vision of Snow White.
Hmm, time will tell how that turns out.
Isn't that interesting? Well, now you don't have to watch it. You can save the money and
hopefully watch them lose that 270 million dollars. As he said, they've lost the point.
I think they've lost the plot, quite frankly. And it goes beyond that. For the longest time,
Disney as well as other franchises have been celebrating the villains. Whether you're talking
about Maleficent or you're talking about the Joker,
they want to celebrate evil. It couldn't be more obvious, could it?
He said, um,
Zegler labeled the song extremely dated because she doesn't want to have any
dating at all. She doesn't want to have any companionship.
She wants to go it alone.
And of course he's not the only one who's talking about this. Others have
reviewed it. Said much of the first half of the movie follows the familiar story
from 1937, the cartoon. The Evil Queen becomes jealous of Snow White when the
magic mirror suggests that perhaps Snow White has grown to be the fairest of
them all. But then this movie starts to chart its own path.
This version of Snow White is something of a girl boss.
Should call it Mary Sue. Mary Sue on the seven doors.
There you go. Her father raised her to be a leader and she is going to stand
aside.
She's not going to stand aside and let her kingdom suffer under the tyranny of her evil stepmother. There is no Prince Charming in
this story at all. She finds seven equally eccentric bandits led by a Robin Hood like
character who help her to save the kingdom. So there she is, okay.
She's gonna do this all on her own.
If you're going to depart from a classic story
that says this review on world,
you ought to make sure that your story is better
than the original.
And that is not the case, definitely with this one.
They said, this live action Snow White
is merely a disjointed pile of cliches.
The plot points are nonsensical.
The dialogue is cringe-inducing. The action scenes are pathetic. Even the sets and costumes
look cheap." This is what has happened to Hollywood in general. That's why I don't
even bother to go to movies anymore. The plot lines are disgusting, degenerate celebrations
Plotlines are disgusting, degenerate celebrations of evil, but the craftsmanship is not even there.
When you look at this recent filming of Wicked, for example, not only does it celebrate wicked
and witches and so forth, but it looks awful. One of the worst looking, it's become famous on
internet, on YouTube for people criticizing the way it's lit, the color, all the rest of stuff.
You know, we just had the company Technicolor go out of business.
It's a fascinating process. There's a lot of videos you can find on YouTube where they talk about how the Technicolor process worked.
But it truly was ingenious and amazing. And when I was talking to Whistler about it
and how complicated it was, they would actually had as big as those cameras
were and with all the film that they were using, they actually had prisms that
were split up and they would record three different versions of it and then
they would invert the negatives and all this and then
recombine them. It's a very long and complicated process, but even the camera was gigantic. The camera had three cameras in it.
It was humongous.
So it took all kinds of ingenuity to get this thing to be able to follow them on a dolly shot or to fit it into a
room or something like that. It was incredibly expensive, incredibly heavy, incredibly hot, as were the lights that they
had.
But the results spoke for themselves.
And I've talked about this before when I talked about music.
Digital audio workstations that we have today versus the tape type of recording that was around just a few decades ago and how it is lossless
and you can run this stuff over and over again.
It's very, very convenient.
But one of the guys who he said he's about my age and he said he started as recording
engineer and he's gone through all this from, you know, when they only had four tracks where
they had 16 and more, He worked in recording studios.
And he said, and you had to carefully plan the stuff out
because each time you mixed it down,
you had losses in those generations and things like that.
But it was also a very expensive process.
And he said, you actually got better results
because the musicians would show up prepared.
They knew they didn't have an infinite,
costless opportunity to do it over and over again. And so it was something of a
live performance. And when I was talking to Whistler about it he said, yeah, it's
when you have all kinds of technological issues that you've got to overcome, it
really helps start these creative juices flowing.
And when people have to overcome these issues,
they get more creative in other aspects of the artwork that's there.
And I think that's one of the things that's happened.
People have gotten dumbed down and lazy.
So much is being done for them.
They don't even think about the lighting is flat now.
The everything about it, the color is washed out,
doesn't have those vibrant deep colors.
But again, cringey dialogue.
Movies have never cost so much to make and looked so bad.
That's right.
Yeah, the money is not up there on the screen as they say,
it's going into somebody's pockets.
I mean, it costs that much and looks so bad,
that's a good way to put it. So again, the action scenes are when it costs that much and looks so bad.
So again, the action scenes are pathetic, even the sets and costumes look cheap. Disney's attempt to update this film for a modern audience turned an already troubled production into an absolute
dumpster fire. Before the Evil Queen showed up, Snow White lived in a perfect utopian socialist
kingdom. Wait, how can you have a king in a socialist
paradise where everyone shares? Never mind these pesky questions. What's
important is that the bounty of the land belongs to all who tend it quote unquote,
says Snow White. So they go on to say Snow White teaches those she meets to
stand up and to use their voices.
Tyranny cannot withstand a people united under the righteous cause of socialism.
They said if the preachy politics weren't bad enough, the hypocrisy gets pretty thick
too in the original cartoon, Snow White tidied up the dwarf's cottage as a thank you for
letting her stay.
We all owe McCarthy such an apology.
Such an apology man. Yeah, they we've been the the Gramsci Marxists have done their
job they have taken over they marched through every single institution. Yeah
especially beginning in the movies Franklin Institute the rest of it. Home
housework they said however is obviously beneath this modern snow white.
Zegler would never do housework, and he wanted she'd look for Prince Charming. So
her exploitation of these seven marginalized dwarfs isn't much different
from the Queen's extraction of wealth from the kingdom. She has them wait on
her hand and foot, because you know some animals on animal farm are more equal than others. So when
we look at this, it is this is where our culture is. And as I said, why are we
getting to this point? Well we're being dumbed down, but culture is downstream
from people's spiritual understanding. And when we look at what we're
celebrating here, you know,
we're celebrating the wicked witches and the rest of this, in the UK, the UK
Telegraph says parents are being asked if newborn babies identify as transgender.
Now the hospital that's doing this says that they have to comply with New Jersey
law.
And after they put this out, there was a lot of finger pointing and everybody, well, I
have to do it.
No, you don't have, I'm not making you do that.
But the headline actually is misleading.
It's not exactly true.
The parents are not being asked if the newborn babies identify as transgender.
The parents are being asked, do you identify your baby as transgender?
Is this the gender that you wanted? If not, do you want to change it?
So two questions. What sex was your baby assigned at birth?
Female, male, or prefer not to answer. And then, do you identify your baby as?
Female, male. Now we have other choices as well.
Transgender, female. Trans woman, male to female. Transgender,
male. Trans man, female to male. Gender, queer. Neither exclusively male nor female. Again,
this is what would you like your baby to be. Not what the baby wants to be. They're not
that far gone yet. They will be. Parents who are asked if their newborn babies identify
as transgender
on a form required under New Jersey state law. That's again not what is being asked.
They got that part of it wrong. But all this is wrong, quite frankly. It's a form produced
by Inspira Health, which operates four hospitals and eight health agencies across the state
of New Jersey. And of course, they're doing this for money.
These hospitals are involved in mutilation of minors for money.
And they've probably already tried to poison them with vaccines for money as babies.
Inspira claims that it created the questionnaire to comply with New Jersey law,
Inspire claims that it created the questionnaire to comply with New Jersey law, requiring health care providers to, quote, collect race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity in
a culturally competent and sensitive manner.
Republican state senator told the New York Post the entire thing lacks common sense and
serves no purpose whatsoever.
Well, partly right.
One of the slogans that we use for the show is make sense common again.
Common sense is not common anymore, but it does have a definite purpose. It's too
bad that the Republican state senator doesn't really see what's going on here.
The bill was modeled after an Indiana statute. Now Indiana is Republican, right?
Except Indiana, at the University of Indiana, is where the perverted, decadent Kinsey Institute
is, a sex research thing, child molesting research place, funded in a conservative Republican
state, like Indiana, the Kinsey Institute. And that's where they
came up with the idea for this, modeling it after that. So, Inspira Health told the Telegraph that it was required by New Jersey law to request patients provide their race and so forth, as I
said before. And it continued. It said, patients are permitted to decline to provide this information. Isn't that nice? They permit us to decline
to provide that. And yet we have children's hospitals are continuing the medical mutilation
despite Trump's order, says the Daily Caller and the Gold Report. But again, what is it?
Trump doesn't have the ability to do anything about that? What is this about? This is about Trump saying he's going to remove money from them.
And again, when we talk to the MAGA people and they say Trump doesn't have anything to do with what happened in 2020 with the lockdowns and the ventilators and the remdesivir and the vaccines.
No, he did the money.
That's what his executive order, the emergency on Friday the 13th was about in 2020.
It was the pandemic was declared by his pharmaceutical executive that he put in charge
of HHS on January the 31st. He declared on March the 13th that there would, that he was going to
release all this money. And that's how these things get done, with the money.
And so these children's hospitals are going to continue this medical mutilation even though
he's not going to pay them for it or he's going to threaten their funding.
Perhaps they're making so much money that they don't care.
So some of these are Boston Medical Center.
I looked this up to see if this was a Boston Children's Hospital, but it's not.
Boston Children's Hospital is connected to Harvard.
They were the ones who did the medical kidnapping that Marty Gottesfeld exposed and they got
sent to prison.
By the way, I just heard from Marty and his wife that they're expecting a baby girl soon.
So I'm real happy for them.
They've been through a lot.
And he was severely punished because he exposed the crimes of a very powerful politically connected hospital
connected to Harvard and
I thought it was amazing to see this from Reason magazine
Taking the
Well, I'll just read you the headline, their kids said they were trans.
Then CPS came knocking at the door.
Across the country, parents of gender dysphoric kids are confronting state intrusion.
So we look at the fact that in New Jersey they're asking, so what do you want your
kid to be?
Do you want your kid to transition into a different thing?
We can mutilate them for you if you'd like. We can sterilize them for you if you'd like. And then here is reason
complaining about the fact that in Texas, if a parent is going to mutilate or sterilize
their child, the CPS would get involved. You know, I'm not a fan of CPS. I've had Dwight
Mitchell on. I've had a lot of other people on talking about how dangerous
CPS is.
And it is, you know, it was created for a reason, and like so many of these government
agencies it has metastasized beyond all reason into a horrific thing.
However, this, this is the reason that you have CPS, and reason has completely lost this plot.
Would it be warranted to have CPS show up if the parents are sexually abusing the child?
How about if they were physically beating the child?
Would it be okay for them to show up?
Now, they think that it ought to always be in the hands of the parent.
Well, you know, the parents may not always do the right thing.
And I think we need to understand that there's different spheres of authority.
They're not necessarily arranged, they're not in hierarchical manner, right?
The family was started by God.
It is the basic building block of society, if you will, but it is not subordinate to
the government in some of society, if you will, but it is not subordinate to the government
in some of these areas.
Just like the government has a sphere of authority, you have a sphere of authority, the family
has a sphere of authority, other institutions do.
But what happens when the parents abuse their children?
Well, at that point, you have other spheres of authority, whether
it's the government, whether it's the church, society in general, have not only
a right but a duty to intervene to protect that child from the parents if
they're sexually abusing them, if they're violently abusing them, and quite frankly
this fits both of those categories. It is violent
what they're doing to them. It is a psychological, a spiritual, a physical
attack on these children and somebody needs to do something about it.
Again, I'm not a big fan of CPS but they got very upset about the fact that in
Texas this is a crime.
Well, it should be a crime.
And I'm glad that they're doing something about it.
Handy said, we had a two-month-old SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, last night.
Do you know how many vaccines are on the CDC schedule for a two-month checkup?
Seven jabs.
That's ridiculous. It's just ridiculous. And that is what's killing the
kids. You know, we had, with the COVID vaccine, we suddenly had sudden adult death syndrome.
And that one mother who said, I realize now that when they told me it was SIDS, I realized
what it really was. Well, as I said before, we're now celebrating the evil, right, because Hollywood has pushed
us towards that. As part of this, the New York Times is saying witches are having a
cultural moment. Some states are taking up their cause, and so they're going back to
the 17th and 18th centuries, 1600s, the 1700s, so we had the witch trials and things like
that, trying to pull that back and say
we're going to exonerate all of them.
Well, I don't know what was happening with any of these things or what these people were
doing.
It appears to have been something that was society gone wild against these individuals,
but we've gone beyond that.
When you look at our entertainment, when you look at our society, we're now celebrating
witches.
We're now celebrating the occult.
We're now celebrating sexual perversion.
We're told that, hey, it's great.
As a matter of fact, you need to start transitioning these babies at a very early age.
And again, we have the movie Wicked that is out there.
It said, part of the draw, said one of the witches who is being interviewed by the New
York Times, part of the draw for us to witchcraft is the acceptance and the celebration of our
personal identities.
Do whatever thou wilt.
That's what they say.
Our bodies, our bodily autonomy, a love for our planet, combining it with the obligatory
liberal worship of the environment. And of course, they're very big into that type of thing.
We had a witch who lived down the road from North Carolina, a literal witch.
And we didn't realize it until she started this celebration.
First it was just before Halloween or something, and they put out all these luminaries going
down the road.
And their house is at the end of this long road.
We're way out in the woods and our house is down the other end.
She had 20 acres, we had 6 acres.
And later that night it sounded like a machine was running.
I thought, what is somebody building, you know, running a machine this late at night?
You know, it's like the glop at a glop at a machine from how to murder your wife or
something.
And so I step outside and I can hear that it's drums banging and flutes playing and stuff like that. I thought that's really strange,
but okay. Then a couple of months later it happened and I thought, is this some kind of a witch thing?
Because she had already given the street the name as a Latin name for witch hazel,
thing, because she had already given the street the name as a Latin name for witch hazel, which was really odd, but she got to name it.
And so I looked it up and it turns out that that day was, like the other one, a witch's
Sabbath.
I said, so I know what's going on here.
So I put some big speakers out on the deck.
I started playing Christian music.
That was the last time they did one
of those parties. Cranked it up as much as I could.
So you know, when we look at this, one of the things that Gard talked about last week
was all this kerfuffle at the Daily Wire about Christ as King. And I would just add my little
two cents into this and say that all the people who are doing
this, these conservatives now, are doing all of the stuff that they accuse the left of
doing.
And that is when you oppose them politically.
What do they do?
They play the race card.
Oh, well, you don't want to support what political Israel is doing.
As a matter of fact, they're having massive riots there.
Netanyahu is trying to get rid of the attorney general.
They have people rioting in the streets there.
It is a political issue.
So is it anti-Semitism to criticize Netanyahu's policies or is it anti-Netanyahuism?
But if you oppose them politically, these so-called conservatives will play the race card on you just like the
left. Shut up! You're anti-Semitic. And quite frankly, I don't care about hurt feelings
in this. We understand that Christ is a stumbling stone and a rock of offense. It was Isaiah
who said that over 700 years before Christ came. He said, �He will be a stone of stumbling stone and a rock of offense." It was Isaiah who said that over 700 years before Christ came. He said, He will be a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense
to both houses of Israel. He means Israel and Judah. And a trap and a snare to the
inhabitants of Jerusalem. So we make no apologies for Christ being King. We make
no apologies if that hurts somebody's feelings because we know it's going to be an offense to people.
He makes some very definite, exclusive claims.
And we say it with as much love as we can.
But we also need to understand that when they want to play this race card, when they want
to say, well, there's some very bad people that are out there saying Christ is King,
well, you know there were some very bad people who used to wear hoods and burn crosses, but that didn't mean that they get to redefine
what the cross is. The Klu Klux Klan doesn't define it, and neither do these Christian
nationalists. Thank you for joining us. Have a good day.
Good evening. Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow, or more
specifically what comes out the other end. Yes, the air is thick with intrigue
as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda even a humble bovine's
backside can be branded a national security threat. The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.
Carefully contrive to panic the masses
into accepting the government stepping in,
jackboots and all, with their solutions.
Because who better to stop a gaseous threat
than a bunch of political windbags?
But one must wonder is this
truly about saving the planet or are we simply being led to pasture? Is it merely
a MacGuffin? The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who
still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny. And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull.
So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please
consider supporting the show.
And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.