The David Knight Show - Mon Episode #1980: Brainless Bodyoids Trial Balloon, Doctors & Detectives Punished for Truth, “Liberation Day?” Satanists on Parade

Episode Date: March 31, 2025

Trump’s Liberation Day Tariff ChaosPanic grips the White House as Trump’s erratic Liberation Day tariff plans, set for April 2nd, spiral into chaosCar Crisis Unleashed: Trump’s Tariffs Jack Prices to the Moon and Trump “couldn’t care less”Musk’s Mega WinCongress surrenders as Trump seizes tariff reins, spitting on the founders’ wisdomDrug Czar Farce: Trump’s Pick Shields CIA’s Dirty Secrets Silencing Dissent: Dr. Sam Bailey’s License Ripped for Defying COVID LiesNew Zealand’s Dr. Sam Bailey, MD pays a brutal price—$90,000 fine and license yanked—for daring to question PCR and Trump’s shots! And in Canada, a detective is punished for investigating SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome).  Don’t look at SIDS or autism! Green Heist: GOP Loves Biden’s $4 Trillion Green Tax Credits King Trump’s Gambit: Constitution Be Damned for a Third Term“I’m not joking” says Trump about a third term Pardon Payoff Scandal: Trump Cashes In on Criminals Like MiltonParadise Found (or bought) by Milton.  Trump’s pardon for Nikola’s fraudster Milton after a cool $2 million campaign gift! Whistleblowers like Kiriakou reported Giuliani selling Trump pardons, while big-tech crooks buy freedom. Satan’s Siege: Churches Vandalized, Black Mass in KansasThe Satanists’ strategy and why their claims of “religious equality” should be ignored Schools, Satanists, and the First Amendment ClashOklahoma fights to reclaim religious rights in schools, while Satanists push abortion pills and Daily Wire’s attempt to gag “Christ is King” becomes an Easter tradition.  From Kenya murders to Idaho lawsuits, faith faces a multi-front war Bodyoid Horror: MIT’s Trial Balloon to Grow Humans for Parts Unleashes Ethical HellMIT floats a nightmare—grow “bodyoids” in labs for drugs, organs, maybe meat! No pain, no brains, they claim, but the transhumanist abyss yawns wide. Is this science or a soulless descent into Brave New World? Vaccine Reckoning: Mixed Signals Whether Justice Will Prevail     Dr. Vernon Coleman drops a bombshell—doctors who pushed COVID shots could be bankrupt by 2030?     Yet Tennessee’s Supreme Court stabs workers in the back, siding with Blue Cross Blue Shield to fire the unvaccinated Greenland MAGA: “Make America GO AWAY”     Trump’s Greenland obsession turns icy as Trump’s chilling statement — “a good POSSIBILITY that we could do it without military force” is an implied threat of military force     And, Panama Port Power Play as China shuts down the deal with antitrust probes “The Who”, Roger Daltry, says he’s going blind & deaf — but he still plays a mean pinball and helps with teen cancer charity as he reflects on aging JFK Bombshell: Alleged NBC’s Secret Tape Could Expose Oswald’s Innocence What’s Behind the Drop in Egg Prices? Mug-Shot! Too Much Coffee in Texas Could Get You a DUI (Driving Under Influence)If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTFor 10% off supplements and books, go to RNCstore.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

The In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 31st of March, year of our Lord 2025. Well, tomorrow is going to be Liberation Day, where we all get richer because of higher taxes. Tax our way to prosperity. This time it's called a tariff. We're going to take a look at the on-again-off-again issues with that. The fact that

JD Vance given a very cold shoulder in Greenland. Not a good place to get the cold shoulder, but he got it. And yet Trump says we're gonna get it one way or the other, 100% certain. He said there's a possibility we might not have to use military action. Wait a minute. I thought we were the good guys in all of this stuff, protecting them from Nazis and things like that. That's the video that Trump put out to the people there as propaganda, but

we'll also be taking a look at the spare parts. Yeah, this is something that's being floated now by MIT. An ethics trial balloon. Yeah, let's talk about the ethics of this. This brave new world that they want to send us into. We'll be right back. Well, I just want to begin by taking care of some financial issues here for the show at the end of the month. We are just a little over the 75% mark and not enough to get it up to the 7-8's. And we had Mary Ellen Moore

who has agreed to match funds today and that includes checks that are dated today. So just to let you know we're going to be taking tips today and also since we're talking about this we're going to be shutting down the stream on Rockfin soon and we need to get the information out. And I still had a couple of people who tipped us last week on Rockfin and I've mentioned it a couple of times, but it's a three hour show. People don't necessarily hear, you know, when you embed one comment there, people might miss a day of the show or something like that or they might miss it even if they catch the

show that day. Here's a situation at Rockfin. I have no Will to them. They've treated us fine. It's been a great community. We've had We've been there for now. I guess four years pretty much and The but the issue is and there's been some small Smaller shows I guess, with a smaller audience that have been shut down and blocked out, but the issue for us is that we can't get our money out of there. What they do is when you send a tip in, it gets changed into a cryptocurrency. And they do that because they want to split everything up into small fractions, you know,

saying that if somebody has signed up for your show, then you get a bonus, but then the monthly amount that they sign up for Rockfin is allocated to shows based on what the people watch. So they wanted to have something that was – could be fractionalized. So they go to a tokenization type of scheme, a securitization type of scheme. They created their own cryptocurrency. The problem is now, we've never had this problem before, but for several months we've not been able to get money out. And so to give you an idea, we've got $800 stuck in there, and if we were to sell it now at the

market rate, because there's no buyers out there for the crypto, we could get $4 for it. $800 and we could cash that in for $4 US dollars. And so it's less than one half of a percent. And that's not even counting the fact that we'd have to then change it from their currency into Ethereum, from Ethereum into dollars. So it would actually cost us money to get it out of there. So please don't, you know, if you're going to try to help the show, that's not going to go to us at this point. We've given it a few weeks to see, actually given it a few months to see if things are going to change.

And we don't see it changing. So I just want to let you know. And so accordingly, what we're going to do is because it's difficult to get the message out to people, we're going to stop streaming on Rockfin and we're going to move to some other platforms. And so we'll tell you more about that as that develops. We'll be streaming on Substack, right, Travis? Is that correct?

I'm going to be trying to work that out. But currently we are on BitChute, Odyssey, Rumble, DLive, Twitter, and I'm also gonna try to set us up a kick channel, which we'll see how that goes. Yeah, so. So you'll have plenty of options. And kick is new.

And right now I think the best place is Rumble, personally. Yeah, kick is new. That was suggested to us by somebody who has offered us a lot of helpful suggestions, and we're gonna try to implement those as much as we can. But I just want to pass that on because it is a real, it's a bad situation. We're hoping that they can get that worked out, but we don't know. So let's talk a little bit about Liberation Day that's coming up tomorrow. The White House officials are quietly

freaking out, says the Daily Mail in the UK, about Trump's upcoming Liberation Day tariff announcements. These are people who are in the Trump administration, anonymously contacting others. But it rings true when you look at how erratic and chaotic Trump's response has been. Basically, the bottom line is they said they're freaking out because nobody knows what it's going to be. Nobody even in the higher position knows because it's just about the whims of the Emperor who has no clothes and no clues about what he's going to do. The mood inside the White House is verging on panic with just two days to go before, well one day to go now, before Trump's liberation day on April the 2nd. Putting aside the idiotic proposition that we've always heard from Democrats and verifying

what I've always said, that Trump is a New York City Democrat, pal of Hillary Clinton, pal of Jeffrey Epstein. And so what would you expect from a New York Democrat? You would expect a plan to raise taxes and tell everybody that it was going to be paid by somebody else. And to tell you that it's our way to prosperity. Where's Rush Limbaugh when we need him, right? Except I think Rush Limbaugh would have been cheering that he would have found some way.

He became so rabidly partisan. He's like Alex Jones or Wayne Allen Root or you name it. I mean, Rush Limbaugh had become that hyperpartisan a long time ago. But he used to joke about the fact, and Republicans used to scoff at the Democrat idea that we're going to tax our way to prosperity, but now we're going to do it. And look, folks, we're not talking about getting rid of the income tax, okay? Let's put that MAGA myth to bed. That is something that has been manufactured by the Trump-sucking media.

He said once, he said, you know, when this country had tariffs instead of an income tax, it was more prosperous. Okay, well there's a lot of reasons for that. And I for one would love to see us collect taxes in a different way, one that would allow us at least allow the taxes to be paid anonymously instead of creating a dossier so that we could be prosecuted or it could be used as a political weapon against people. I've never liked that about the income tax. It's too noisy. It's too much paperwork. It's too intrusive.

I mean we had a business, we collected sales tax and we sent it in, there's no big deal. The big deal was the income tax. I had to hire an accountant to do the income taxes for us. But you know to collect sales taxes and send that in, that's not a problem. Europe, we get a lot more money in taxes out of the AT taxes and things like that. But it's not really about the taxes. And look, it's not about the money anyway. There's absolutely no way they're going to come within nuclear bomb striking distance of balancing the budget.

Not a chance. Trump was furious with Republicans because they didn't remove the death ceiling for another two years. So he doesn't care about the deficit. Democrats definitely don't care about the deficit. They have, they're following the modern monetary theory. I call it the magic money tree,

which says the deficits don't matter. And if inflation gets too high, what do we do? We just raise the taxes, right? Is that what Trump is doing? Is he really bought in? Is he that much of a Democrat that he bought in the modern monetary theory? Is he just doing whatever he wishes? Well, who knows? Trump is expected to unveil sweeping new tariffs on America's global trading partners. No, he's gonna be unleashing sweeping new tariffs on American consumers. As I was saying, all he did was talk about, well, you know, when America had tariffs

instead of an income tax, it was more prosperous, and then you got the media saying, he's gonna get rid of the income tax. No, he's not. He's talking about how he's going to modify the income tax and he's gonna make tax cuts permanent. That means he's gonna make the income tax? No, he's not. He's talking about how he's going to modify the income tax. He's going to make tax cuts permanent. That means he's going to make the income tax permanent. Behind closed doors, top administration officials are quietly admitting that they're unsure what the president is actually going to do. No one knows what is going on, said one White House ally. He inserted a profanity in there for emphasis. The emphasis

is on the F word. Trump's administration's aggressive new tariff push is triggering anxieties on a global scale with even Trump's staunch allies bracing for a chaotic rollout. See, this is the point. This is not about protecting a particular industry. This is not about funding the government off of tariffs. This is simply about chaos. That's what it's about. It's about creating chaos. The president has signaled more than a trillion dollars in trade could be affected. With less than a week dollars in trade could be affected. With less than a week to go, even the most basic details, including which countries will be hit

and at what rates and for which goods remains undecided or is constantly shifting. There's two things that are emerging from this so far. A pattern that looks very Biden-like. Biden-esque? What do we call that? Yeah, I guess Biden-esque. Number one, he's targeting countries. So this is really like a sanction. And that is one of the key issues behind it. The second thing is that he's targeting cars.

Biden didn't want you to have a car. Trump doesn't want you to be able to afford a car, you see. Biden was just going to outright ban them. Trump is going to make them unaffordable. You see the difference? The Republicans always do it through money. It's just like with the COVID stuff. Well, I'm going to give money to the governors to roll out this stuff. Whereas Biden comes in and says,

if you don't do it, I'm going to take money away from you. It's always that way. You just declare it by executive order, mandate it. Behind the public messaging lies a far more chaotic reality, writes the Daily Mail. Trump has repeatedly overridden or contradicted his own advisors on trade policy. JD Vance, Suzy Wiles, Scott Bessent have pushed for smaller and more targeted tariff plans or at least a structured rollout that allows businesses to prepare. Now the Treasury

Secretary Scott Bessent, if you remember about a month or so ago when Trump is saying we're gonna roll out 25 percent tariffs, Bessent said it's gonna be gradual, we're going to do it like two and a half percent a month to see if people will come along. So it'll take us 10 months to get up to 25%. Immediately Trump comes out and says, no, we're going to do it all at once. It's like, where did Besant, did he just do that on his own? I don't think so.

This guy's been around for a long time. He's not going to concoct an idea on his own and just throw it out there. The same thing in that first issue with Pete Hegsett. People said, look, he just made this up. And he went, no, he didn't. Trump changed. They had a meeting with somebody somewhere in the Trump administration, and it was agreed that we're going to do that.

He puts this out, Trump agrees to it. So then he says it publicly. Yeah, we'll do it two and a half percent a month for ten months. And then Trump changes his mind and leaves these guys hanging out there as if they just made this stuff up. They're not, somebody like, I could believe possibly that Pete Hegseth would do it, although I don't think that was the situation with his, but I absolutely don't think. Scott Besant is too, too, too cautious politically. As a guy who's been around for a long time, I don't think he would do that. But the

president has fluctuated wildly between levies on specific sectors and blanket tariffs on all countries. We may have sectoral tariffs on April 2nd and we may not. One White House official this week to Politico. No final decisions have been made yet. They probably still don't know. It'll probably just depend on the mood that he's in when he gets up in the morning tomorrow. Even core strategic decisions appear to remain unsettled. Administration officials have floated the idea of calculating tariffs reciprocally based on how the countries

treat US exports. But the president has shown little interest in that. It's too technical. I don't want to look at that. Earlier this week, he blindsided his staff with a sudden 25% tariff on auto imports. As a matter of fact, you could tell that Besant and Lutnik were blindsided on the blanket tariffs against Canada and Mexico to start with. First of all, Trump just ignored, as I've said many times, ignored his USMCA, which

is just his own personal relabeling of NAFTA. It's kind of like the Gulf of American NAFTA. It's his own personal imprimatur that he put onto this horrible trade situation. Trump said, I may give a lot of countries breaks and we might be even nicer than that. Who knows though? And it's this uncertainty that is creating chaos and messing with all the markets. It used to be that Trump measured his economic success by the stock market. He doesn't care about that anymore.

And he doesn't care about the price of cars either. He said so. Said he couldn't care less about the price of cars. Days earlier, he insisted that every country will be hit with a tariff. So who knows? So Tom Graf, Chief Investment Officer at Facit, said, I think it would be a mistake to think that next week all of a sudden we're going to get a bunch of clarity. I'm sure they're trying to reset with financial markets and to build some certainty, but I don't think the president

is going to have a personality transplant. Even Trump's inner circle, Besant, economic advisor Kevin Hassett, recently told industry leaders that only 10-15 countries dubbed the dirty 15 would face tariffs. No, that's not accurate, actually, from the Daily Mail. I talked about this last week. They went on two separate programs. One of them, and I forget which is which, one of them said there was going to be 15 countries, like they said here. The other one said it was going to be 15% of the countries. They don't know. There isn't any clear policy. Trump says the US will use reciprocal terrorists on the European Union, but Trump publicly

overruled them and indicated a broader sweep of penalties would come in, reportedly infuriating some within his cabinet. A power struggle appears to be playing out between two camps, those advocating for a restrained strategic approach on terrorists and those fueling the president's instinct for confrontation. Vance Wiles and Besant have argued for discipline and predictability. On the other side are Howard Lutnick and Peter Navarro. Peter Navarro, you know the guy who ran the program to put ventilators out everywhere,

tell all the automobile companies, stop making cars. Now I want you to make ventilators. That hero of MAGA, that Stalin-esque central planner, Peter Navarro, is one of the guys who wants confrontation. I guess he wants to put the entire economy on a ventilator now. Kill it. Yeah. He deserved a lot more jail time than he got for the other crimes that they never came after him for. �We are the greatest economic team and April 2nd will be the historic day for the American workers,� said Howard �Lucky� Lutnick. But others inside the administration are less certain of his motivations. He goes to the Oval Office and he tells the President whatever the President wants to hear said one Trump ally calling Lutnik a

nightmare who backs Trump's instincts without considering broader consequences. So Senator Josh Hawley said when we look at the tariffs he says this is Trump not anyone else. Mitch McConnell who who doesn't like Trump, of course, but he says, well, we don't have the ability to do anything other than complain. He's frozen. He's frozen out. But look, Congress should be making the decisions on tariffs. They have abdicated that to the President. I mean, they've given him signed over their power to do this. And so that's why we get this kind of, it's interesting, you know, whenever we look at something and it's like, well, the Constitution says to do it this way.

We see the wisdom of the founders and we see the folly of Congress today, our contemporaries. They haven't a clue. You want to have this type of stuff so that it doesn't reside in the executive, so that you don't have this kind of capricious, arbitrary, vacillating, chaotic situation. So, consumer sentiment is falling very rapidly. Business owners feel supply chains will be wrecked overnight. Oh well, let's see. That's never happened. Oh yes, right it did. It happened in 2020. Yeah, a capricious, arbitrary, unnecessary lockdown. By the way, we got an update on Sam Bailey. They have come after her in New Zealand. Massive fine, about $90,000, and taken her license.

Now Sam Bailey has been on in the past talking about the nonsense of the pandemic, and she is an advocate for saying we haven't seen any, and she's calling for it, so let's see your scientific evidence of this. Unless you want to produce any scientific evidence of viruses, unless you want to show us isolated viruses, we're not going to play along with this game. You make this claim, you need to prove it with science. Well, they have now taken her license, and folks had nothing to do with her position on whether or not viruses exist. It was 100% about her questioning the PCR and about her questioning the Trump shot.

100%. They took her license. And we've got more like that coming up. She's not the only one that has situations where a detective in Canada who was investigating SIDS has now been removed as well. CDC says that SIDS is rare and even though the CDC also says it's the leading cause of death with infants. How is it rare and one of the leading causes of death? Well, because rare is always the lie that they tell you about this stuff.

But getting back to the terrorists, consumer sentiment is falling rapidly, worried that supply chains are going to crash suddenly, business owners are. The President isn't looking at it like they are, he's at a source close to the inner circle. If the economy tanks then fine, the economy tanks, he said, because the President truly believes that it will rebound and the countries will give in. See, he didn't care if the economy tanked when we were talking about the lockdowns for the non-existent pandemic. If it tanks, it tanks. I don't care.

You know, we'll come back. That's not what is important anyway. I've got an agenda here. I don't really care what happens to you. As a matter of fact, Wall Street Journal headlined, the era of cheap stuff was already ending. Now comes the tariff threat to accelerate it. Because the people around Trump are accelerationists. They want to move fast, they want to break things so they can rebuild it and build it back better, right?

That's what we've been hearing from World Economic Forum for a long time. The era of cheap stuff is already ending. Now it's going away. Oh, wait a minute. That's okay. Because of the tax, we're all going to be prosperous. Goods are rising after decades of deflation and Trump's tariffs will give an added push. Yeah, push is right over the edge. Trump says he couldn't care less if automakers raise prices due to tariffs. Doesn't matter to him. Just like Biden said when he started banning cars for emissions, when he started banning

oil, when he pulled down the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and all the rest of the stuff, put sanctions on Russia, which by the way never hurt Russia it was a bonus they made over 300 billion dollars right away why because the price went up so high Putin could sell it at a discount and get paid in gold instead of dollars and it was a windfall profit 300 billion dollars more than they'd made and of course the EU was violating all of these sanctions as well buying more gas from Russia than they were giving in money to Ukraine. Folks it's never about what they say it's about. That's the first rule of looking at the statements from these politicians

whether they're Democrats or Republicans Trump Trump or Biden, doesn't matter. It's never about what they say. Trump says he doesn't care. Foreign automakers raise prices due to tariffs. President waved off concerns that his agenda is causing volatility on Wall Street or decreasing consumer confidence, pointing to polling that shows that the share of Americans who believe the country's on the right track is at a record high. Well, because they've been told that over and over again. They've been told it by alternative media and

some mainstream media who are Trump sucker proxies. He says what I see is when they look at the right track wrong track on the right track was the first time in like 40 years where it was the right track. Well that's his characterization of it. I didn't go back and fact check that. I don't really care. And I don't really care if people are marching over the cliff like lemmings. It is what it is. And we know where this is going to head. The president said he couldn't care less if automakers raised prices after he announced that he would impose a 25% tax on all foreign-made automobiles.

But as I pointed out, for American cars, okay, let's say that you're buying a foreign car, all parts made foreign, assembled in another country and imported. The whole thing is imported all at once. The average price of a car in the US right now is $48,000. I know that's incredible to believe that it's that high. That would add 25% tariff, would add $12,000 to the price of a $48,000 car. Now overnight becomes $60,000 and Trump says he couldn't care less. He doesn't want you to have a car anyway. I mean, he doesn't drive cars, right? People drive him everywhere he goes.

Who needs a car? I got chauffeurs. I got private jets. I got gigantic jets. Sometimes they're paid for by the taxpayers. Sometimes he pays for them out of his fortune. But even if you're not buying the whole foreign car, you're not going the whole foreign car route because they've distributed the production

over Mexico and Canada at the very least, and those parts that are going back and forth, back and forth as part of the assembly, are going to be taxed as they go back and forth. Instead of it raising the price of a car by $12,000, the trade association says it would raise the price of a car four to five thousand dollars. And Trump couldn't care less about that either. He's holding million dollar a night fundraisers still at Mar-a-Lago, which the Signal Gate crowd all went to attend after giving each other fist bumps and flexed biceps and American flags and fire emojis over mass murder of

civilians across the world They go to million dollar night fundraiser. They couldn't care less about the lives of civilians in another country and Trump doesn't care about the price of your car, certainly. Trump said the message is congratulations if you make your car in the United States you're going to make a lot of money. Guess who the only car company that makes everything in the United States is? Oh, it's Tesla. Elon Musk is going to make a lot of money. And I'll just say here, since we just mentioned that, all the stuff that is happening with the protests

against Tesla and the protests in support of Tesla, I think it's kind of an interesting visual meme as to what has happened in this country. Here's a guy who all of his life was pushing the green agenda, ESG, all the rest of this stuff. He is a greenwashed billionaire, multibillionaire, the richest man in history. And he got all that by pushing all the stuff that the right hates. And then all of a sudden he just reinvents himself just like Donald Trump just like Tulsi Gabbard just like R.F.K. Jr. they reinvent themselves and all of a sudden these lemmings in MAGA adore them and follow them off the cliff it's amazing to me and and so you've got people out there

who just a couple of years ago hated Tesla's, the conservatives, because they were being used to push through not only a green agenda, not only being used to make private cars unaffordable, but also Musk was at the forefront of the self-driving car movement, which is about taking away all private cars and having you pay for a ride if you can afford it. And Musk has recently reiterated that over and over again, even after he reinvented himself as dark maga.

He's still saying, well, in a few years nobody's going to own a car. They'll all be renting rides from him, he thinks, or somebody like him. And that's one of the reasons why he bought the White House, is because he wants to make sure that you're renting your ride from him. And yet, the MAGA people are out there, oh yay, yay, Tesla is America, blah, blah, blah. Look, I don't support firebombing car dealerships or recharging stations. The attacks, the lunatic left out there, the leftist radicals now who hate him, who used to love him, now hate him. And you've got them literally attacking Tesla car owners.

They don't have any idea what their politics are. We had a woman, I think she was 61 years old, a guy cuts her off in traffic, gets out of the car, runs over to her car and starts beating her inside of her car. We had a handicapped woman who had her car vandalized because it was a Tesla. They don't know her, they don't know her politics. This is the mindless radical violence of the left, but let me tell you, in a different way, the conservatives are just as mindless. They're out there plotting this Baphomet billionaire who is trying to bring in the technocracy.

Who wants to take everything from them, especially their cars? And they're out there cheering him. I just don't get it. I mean, people can drive whatever they want. I don't care what people drive. I care what Musk does That's what I care about Anyway We're pressed if CEOs if he told CEOs not to raise prices Trump said no I never said that I couldn't care less if they raise prices because people are going to start buying American-made cars

I couldn't care less I hope they raise their prices because if they do people are going to buy American-made cars, and we have plenty Except that the price of American-made cars is going to go up and what is an American-made car? How much content makes it an American-made car? Does it have to be a hundred percent here? Is there infrastructure to do that? Of course there isn't. So of course you're going to pay a lot more for cars. Don't know how long it's going to take before they move their components here to the U.S. You're dealing with the Ford of Theseus here. Yeah, either way he doesn't care. And when it comes to eggs, well here's the solution.

The USDA is going to keep killing chickens and we're going to import eggs. Wait a minute, we're not going to have tariffs on eggs? There, you're going to get our eggs from Turkey. There'll be turkey eggs. How about that? I guess they're bigger. I don't know. So, yeah, this is where we are.

It's just his agenda that matters to him. Meanwhile, he has appointed Sarah Carter, a Fox journalist, as the new drug czar. New drug czar. Says she will, quote, protect our nation, save our children. Is that, how's that worked out for us? We've gone through D.A.R.E., we've we've gone through this is your brain on drugs and all the rest. And listen to what he has to say. �From Afghanistan to our border, Sarah's relentless pursuit of justice, particularly

in tackling the fentanyl and opioid crisis, has exposed terrorist drug lords and sex traffickers.� Okay, good. Now do the CIA, Sarah, because they're the biggest drug traffickers and he begins with Afghanistan. Are you kidding me? And talking about the opioid crisis, then fentanyl comes out of that. Fentanyl is a synthetic drug created by our pharmaceutical companies and they started pushing that when, you know, we were getting record amounts of opioids from Afghanistan.

I believe that's one of the reasons that we were there. We had troops that were guarding the poppy fields. So you even had Geraldo Rivera reporting on that years and years ago. And you could see the production. It was down less than 10% of the world supply, went up to the high 90s. Throughout our occupation, we were creating opioids. We had the CIA creating crack cocaine and creating a crack cocaine epidemic to support their wars in Central America and other things like that. But it's not even about promoting the war in Central America. The CIA is a drug running organization.

It is a terrorist organization. The CIA are drug lords. The CIA are sex traffickers. Look at yourself. Look in the mirror, drug czar. We don't need a czar in America. I'm sick of these. That's the first place they use that term.

As our next drug czar, Sarah will lead the charge to protect our nation and save our children from the scourge of drugs. Well then I guess it's going to get a lot worse. Because it is not a law enforcement issue. It is not a government issue. It's a family issue. It's a spiritual issue. It's a lot of things like that. And if you want to

look at the criminals who are victimizing people, look at the US government, specifically the CIA. So federal energy tax credits will cost more than four trillion dollars, but lawmakers might not cut them. We'll talk about that when we come back. Gonna save a lot of money, are you? Well, are they gonna remove some of the things that have made these green-washed billionaires so rich? Is Elon Musk ever gonna look at the military-industrial complex and those contracts, or the NASA contracts with his company? You better believe they won't. They'll never look at that stuff. We're gonna take a quick break folks and we will be right back. So So So

So You're listening to the David Knight Show. Alright, welcome back. And I just want to remind people what I said at the very beginning. We have matching funds. Mary Ellen Moore has kindly agreed to match funds today on this last day of the month. We're a bit behind. And so that's any funds that you, any tips that you put on Rumble, on Zelle, on Cash App, things like that, as well as on any checks dated today. So just wanted to let you know. And if you want to know where you can donate to us, go to davidknight.news and you can see where you can find the show.

You can see where you can find live streams. can see where you can find live streams as I mentioned earlier we're going to be stopping the live streaming to Rockfin because and please don't tip there because we can't get the money out of Rockfin as I said earlier it's been going on now for a couple months and they convert it to a cryptocurrency and there's no buyers for those cryptocurrency just to be clear about it so please do not tip there and so anyway if you'd like to know where you can find us we're going to be adding some new places where you can find the program we're going to be on sub stack as well as kick and some other places that were don't quite have it up yet but we will be putting that up soon and on, and on rumble, we have a waking up around, said, trying to find that

Whistler tune, is it available for purchase? No, it's not. Um, that is, but that was based on, uh, for a fistful of dollars. I did, um, uh, like the verse, if you will, for a fistful, it's a, it's a, um, instrumental and so I did that and I did the bridge for, uh, the good will, for a fistful. It's an instrumental. And so I did that and I did the bridge for the good band, The Ugly. And then we split them into two different breaks. But originally I had it as one piece, but we split it because it was about two minutes long. I called it Fistful of Ugly. But the one that Whistler did is not available. And it is kind of

interesting, I guess now, if we do a cover of a song, if we do it differently, they're now identifying them as... I changed the Liberty Fanfare, which opens up the show, changed that significantly from the John Williams composition. But it's not a legitimate claim anyway. It's from a company in China which has no copyright claim over anything that John Williams did anyway. It's just, I don't even want to deal with YouTube anymore or these streaming services. So yeah, it's not available for purchase.

But I appreciate that. Thank you. And on Rumble, Gtalent 60 is now a monthly supporter. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Well, as I said, the Federal Energy Tax Credit... Before that, I just want to break in and say for the people on Rumble, I'm going to start working on some custom emotes, so you'll have some fun little things to put in chat. Okay, that's great. On the federal tax credits, it's looking like it's going to cost more than $4 trillion. As I said, you're not going to see them back away from the screenwashing crony capitalism,

this corruption. They're not going to pay any attention to that. They're not going to pay attention to the military industrial complex. You know, when I was looking at all these bull claims by Doe's, you remember I said they're not even going to get a trillion dollars out of this stuff because they're not going to touch the welfare state, the warfare state. And they've looked a little bit at the waste, fraud, and abuse within the welfare state. Not a peep about the waste, fraud and abuse in the Pentagon that I've seen. I haven't seen them talk about that at all. I think one

of the reasons for that is that Musk is first and foremost a military industrial complex contractor himself. So Republican members in Congress are lobbying to keep the inflation reduction acts tax credits alive. They want to keep all that money flowing to people just like Biden. One of the largest talking points in the House and Senate negotiations is the House passed plan to identify 880 billion dollars in spending cuts through fiscal year 2034 and programs overseen by the Energy and Commerce Committee. All right, so understand what they're talking about is nearly 10 years worth of stuff. $880 billion over 10 years. And they're going to look at it.

They're not cutting anything. They're not cutting anything now either. It requires substantial reforms or cuts to entitlements though, like Medicaid. That they may take a look at. Lawmakers could target energy tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act, but they're more likely to do the Medicaid instead if they cut anything. Tax credits for renewables, for sustainable aviation fuel, and this is sustainable aviation fuel.

That means a new formulation that you're going, is probably going to be less efficient, more costly, probably even have a higher carbon footprint by their own measurements. But it's a new kind of fuel that somebody has come up with and they're going to make a lot of money with that. Nuclear power and also of course electric vehicles. The bill also gave oil and gas companies access to 500 billion dollars in new tax credits. The IRA subsidies have largely benefited wealthy households and large corporations. Congressional Budget Office had projected that it would cost 370 billion dollars over 10 years. However,

they have now raised that to 1.97 trillion. In other words, more than six, about six times what they'd originally said it was going to be. And we're only a couple of years into the ten years. One of the most expensive provisions in the bill is its clean energy investment and production tax credits, which have no expiration date. They will only end when there is a 75% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector. So you better believe that that isn't going to happen. Well, Trump is so popular in his own mind that he, in an interview over the weekend, said that he's thinking about running for third term already.

And then he added, I'm not joking. And he's not joking. The Constitution be damned. He doesn't care what the Constitution says. There was a constitutional amendment. This is not just a law that was passed. It was a constitutional amendment. So Trump teased that he might run for a third term, explaining to NBC News that he enjoys working, and he is, quote, not joking, unquote, about making another run for the office. You see, because power is what gives these guys meaning to their life. I've always talked about how Hillary Clinton used that phrase, the politics of meaning, and I said stop and think about it how pathetic that is. The meaning to her life is her power, her office, and they never think they're going to die. Trump is just like Mitch McConnell, or just like Darth Vader Ginsburg, or just like, I'm

Diane, I'm still doing fine, Stein. They drop dead in office. They go when obviously they're impaired and they can't do their job any longer, but to them that's their life. They don't see any life outside of ordering other people around. And same thing with Trump. That's what keeps them going. The politics of meaning in it really is pathetic, actually. The 22nd Amendment of the Constitution was ratified in 1951. It prevents individuals from serving more than two terms as president. Who cares it's just the Constitution, it's just a piece of paper

right? And like with the Second Amendment what Trump said about banning bump stocks and red flags and stuff like that, fortunately I can do that myself for the stroke of hand, I don't really care. So you know, fortunately the Constitution doesn't apply to President Trump does it? We've seen that over and over again. He just does as he wishes. There are methods which you could do it, he said, when asked how he could run for a third term on NBC. So they said, they said, well, what about Vice President Vance? Could he run for for the presidency could he win it and then pass it back to Trump? President said such a scenario is one of the methods that he could use to serve as a third term

You know, he could run Melania for example, and then she could abdicate You know make her a Vita. He said, but there's other things too, he said, without elaborating. I like working, he said. And so, yeah, it is the power that keeps him going. Meanwhile, we have one congressman here in Tennessee, Andy Ogles, and I talked about this, what a pathetic virtue signaling and ego massaging of Trump this bill was. Andy Ogles in Tennessee introduced a resolution just days after Trump's inauguration in January to allow him to have three terms in office. Boot licking sycophant who doesn't care about the Constitution.

And he said in January, he said, Trump has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation's decay in January. He said this. And restoring America to greatness and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal. And so he says to that end, I'm proposing an amendment to the Constitution. Well, at least he's going to try to amend the Constitution, which means it'll never happen. To revise limitations imposed by the 22nd Amendment on presidential terms is still just virtue signaling

and ego massaging and foot kissing by Andy Ogle's pathetic, pathetic display. Meanwhile, talk about how indispensable Trump is. He's now pardoned a convicted big tech criminal this week and this is from Health Impact News, Brian Shalhavi. It's the guy, Trevor Milton, who founded Nikola Motors. Hmm, it sounds like Tesla, doesn't it? Nikola Tesla. I remember when it happened. I said, why don't these people leave Tesla alone? Picking on him and dragging his good name through the mud. It was an EV startup company that was going to make Cybertrucks and not the Cybertruck like we see with Elon Musk, but big 18-wheelers

he's gonna make the big rigs and People bought his hopium Because you can make a lot of money on Wall Street with if you're good at PR and you're good at running a con game You don't have to deliver product as I've said before when we look at these companies They can operate for decades at a loss experienced it when we were in the video business the video business when we got in was a fractionalized group of mom and pops everywhere and It really was a free market and then you started having the big guys come in guy who made a lot of money with waste

management and services block blockbuster and it was it was a model that was created by a couple of guys who's another mom-and-pop type of thing but they they did several stores that were big and so he said I'm gonna buy that I'm gonna replicate it across the country because I've got a lot of money and he did and they made a profit at first but then Paramount, I should say Viacom, the parent company of Paramount bought it and they never made a profit after that. But they continued on for like another 25 years before they shut down, because they could always, it's like being able to print money with the Federal Reserve.

If you've got a publicly traded company, all you do is give people a good story. Well, same thing was going on with Nikola Motors. And I talked about this when it happened. One of the stunts that he pulled, and he was convicted of fraud because he did things like this. One of them was he rolled a truck down a hill and claimed that it was operating on its own power. And that was exposed by an investment company that had a series of investigations

in them. He was sentenced to four years in prison in 2023 for fraud after misleading investors about Nikola's hydrogen and electric trucks. He stepped down in 2020 after a damning report from a short seller, Hindenburg Research, and they were the ones who were on him like a cheap suit, and they just showed one thing after the other. This truck rolling down the hill was just one of them. But interesting, interesting name for a research company that is essentially burned down his company, the Hindenburg Research people, burned down his country like a hydrogen balloon, hydrogen zeppelin I should say.

They alleged that he had exaggerated the capabilities of the trucks, that he had faked many publicity videos, and they proved it by the way. Nevertheless, Milton and his wife reportedly contributed $1.8 million to Trump's campaign. He was convicted in 2023, and then he contributes about $2 million to Trump's 2024 campaign the next year. He also gave $750,000 to RFK Jr. and to his Maha Alliance, a political action committee that tried to persuade supporters of RFKJ to back Trump after Kennedy dropped out of the presidential race.

As Brian Shalhavi points out on healthimpact.com, he said, Mr. Milton contributed 121,000 directly to Mr. Kennedy's campaign in September after he had suspended his campaign. So he lavishes hundreds of thousands of dollars, millions of dollars on R.F.K. Jr. and hundreds of thousands on R.F.K. Jr., nearly a million, 750,000. Two million to Trump, and lo and behold, he gets a pardon. I'll just remind you that John Kiriakou has told the story many times. He told it on this story, on this show, that he was trying to get a pardon because he wanted to get his pension from the CIA.

He was a CIA whistleblower who went to jail for exposing the lies about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were obtained by illegal torture, done by Gina Haspel, who was promoted to the head of the CIA by Trump. And so he heard that Rudy Giuliani was giving out pardons, and so he visited him and he said, we sat down, he had a couple of people that were there with him, and we talked just a little bit of small talk, and then Rudy says, I've got to go to the bathroom, and he gets up and these two guys say to him, it'll cost you a million dollars to get a pardon.

He's selling pardons. So first of all, I don't have a million dollars. Secondly, it wouldn't make any sense for me to give you a million dollars to get like a 700,000 or whatever it was. It was less than a million dollars for his pension. He had served the time. They put him to jail. The only person to go to jail, and we had people who tortured illegally.

We had people who then used lies and got us involved in the Iraq war based on those lies. They were promoted and protected. The only person who went to prison was the one who told the truth about what happened. That's John Kyriakos. And he can't even get his pension. And so, do you think that these pardons have been sold for quite a while like this? So here's another one. $1.8 million to Trump's campaign. So I guess, you know, for his, he had to give $2 million. I wonder who the intermediary was on that. Mr. Milton reportedly became very rich from Nicola even though he never had a working model of anything.

Nothing. It was all just a hoax. Moderna, by the way, was like that as well. You know, that Trump shot was developed by DARPA and the military. They gave it to Moderna. Moderna had never had a product. They had had one pump and dump story after the other to make money on Wall Street. In one demo, he reportedly used a GM truck and simply replaced the logo with Nikola's to make it look like he actually had a working model. And I guess it was all downhill from there. But it in neutral. Roll it.

Got the cameras rolling? Okay, let's just let the break off here. And he's got a new unlimited source of energy. It's called gravity. And he was informed about the gravity of the situation, but no problem at all, just $2 million to Trump and he's rolling in dough. In 2019, he purchased a $32.5 million, 2,000 acre ranch in Utah, the largest purchase ever in Utah.

He still got the house. You only had to pay Trump $2 million. I mean, his house cost him $32 million. Milton was investigated for sexual abuse as well, and a huge scandal in Utah that involved the Attorney General and an associate of Milton who reported this, but then was later found dead by suicide. And then the Utah Attorney General did not investigate him And then there were future campaign donations

For that attorney general from this guy as crooked as they come take a look at the people that Trump did pardon At the 11th hour. They skipped over people like Ross Ulbrich back in 2020 Julian Assange and on and on all the political prisoners that did not deserve to be there. Marty Goddard. Well he skipped over all of them and he pardoned some of the biggest white-collar criminals in history. I wonder how much he was paid. We'll never know. On rumble, Conn, thank you very much for the tip. He said did you say matching tips today? Yes I did. It's Mary Ellen Moore is matching them today.

We really do appreciate that. And thank you for that. And on Rumble, don't frag me, bro. Thank you very much. He says, he who's not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. If you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust."

I absolutely agree with that. That's a great quote. On Rumble, Knights of the Storm. Thank you guys. Jason Barker, Angry Tiger, thank you very much. And he says, thanks to Mary Ellen Moore for tip matching. Check out her work. Yes, thank you.

I should mention her website. freemindfilms.com freemindsfilm.com. On Rumble, Geesebusters. Thank you very much. He says, good morning all. Yeah, I mentioned that he sent me another picture of a bird that had been hit by a car. Small bird on the road. He says, looks like bird flu is hitting again.

I said, yeah, bird flu right into the car. Maybe it flew into a Tesla, not a Tesla, a Nikola truck that was coasting downhill. Who knows? On Rumble, RCF 2020, thank you very much. And he says, thank you to the night team. And on Rumble, I.B. White, thank you for that. I appreciate it. He says, God bless you and your family. On Rumble, for Love of the Road road five subscriptions to the show and donated five dollars thank you so much and it was for love of the road that did that great medallion that we have sold out of and i am so sad to see that go i loved that medallion and they went really really fast i thank you so much for doing that appreciate that that was a huge help this month huge help

he said just jumping on to see the tips looking like a tip rally to finish out the month. Hoping someone is matching them. Yes, it's Mary Ellen Moore of Free Mind Films. I said, we'll listen later this evening. On Rumble, Just the Tip has gifted five subscriptions to the show. Thank you very much. Also on Rumble, Seanio9889 says, ìHey David, have you heard about Dr. Shivaís journals involving Cytosolve and promising ALS treatments being published in Nature last month?î No, Iíve not. Iíve not heard about that at all. Iíll have to look into that.

Well, weíre going to take a quick break folks and weíll be right back. The The The Making sense, comment again. You're listening to the David Knight Show. I'll get you my pretty and your little dog too! Yeah I guess we're not in Kansas anymore. It's not the Kansas that we knew. There was some crazy stuff happening over the weekend. You had some satanic churches trying to make a name for itself. I've never seen their name before. And there's a lot of these little organizations out there.

Satan's got a lot of denominations. These are people who say they don't believe in him, but they're still going to use it to raise money. We've got a lot of churches like that too. They're all over the place, quite frankly. But this is a satanic message that was found at a vandalized Catholic church in Kansas, and it happened just before there was a kerfuffle at the state Capitol as well. A possible hate crime, they said. And they're emphasizing this. And let

me just say that as a Christian, let's not treat this as a hate crime. This was vandalism, it was breaking and entering. Those are crimes. And yes, you can see from what was written there that you can understand what their motivation is might help you to find the people, but there should never be any such thing as a hate crime. Not if we're going to have free speech and the free exercise of religion. If you're going to go down this route, there's a lot of people who think that what Christians have to say is hateful. And we will lose our ability to say that if

you're going to go down. Hate should never be a crime. Hate is a motive. Hate can help us to understand the motive and to catch the criminal and so forth, but it is not in itself a crime. If it is, we will have no free speech, we'll have no free exercise of religion. But they were not exercising their religion, or well, I know, maybe they were, maybe breaking and re-inventalizing is a part of the Sathonic religion, who knows. But they broke into St. Patrick's Catholic Church on Saturday morning. Extensive vandalism, that is a crime, clearly. Damage to statues, to candles, to glass, they broke in and broke everything up. The police chief said this is a reprehensible act of vandalism that will not be tolerated. Our officers and

investigators worked tirelessly to bring this suspect to justice and they already caught somebody. A 23-year-old suspect. I guess they could recognize him by his red suit and horns. That he's dressing up to emulate his master. In a Facebook post, the Kansas Catholic Conference said, a satanic website was scrawled on a wall. That's kind of a dead giveaway, maybe. I don't know. Anyway, this is the face of evil. This is the same type of group that will be holding a satanic worship

ritual on the grounds of the Kansas State Capitol on March the 28th. And lo and behold, that is what happened as well. You can see there, they broke up a statue that was there. Yeah, a lot of vandalism breaking and entering and so forth. Well, that did happen at the state capital again in Kansas. Now all this is happening as the culture celebrates the Wicked Witch. Yeah, Wicked, you know, Broadway play, now movie, with one of the worst-looking, probably should win an

award for the worst-looking cinematography. I've seen Grindhouse films in the 70s and had better cinematography than Wicked did. Anyway, they have lost the plot. They have lost the ability to make films, you name it. The Satanic Grotto is the name of this new little thing and this is why this guy is trying to make a name for himself It's all about getting attention I'm sorry. I mentioned his name shouldn't mention it, but we'll also mention The name of the leader his name is Michael Stewart

He has been detained because he got into a fight at the Kansas State House they wanted to have a black mass inside the Capitol and the governor got involved I believe and shut this thing down. So they did it out in front and so what was their black mass? It was basically a way to mock into what the Catholic Church is doing. So they've got like a communion host and he wanted to have this thing there and throw it on the ground and stomp it and that type of thing. And there was a Catholic guy there who jumped in and covered it and

then ate it so that he couldn't smash it up. And somebody said, well, wait a minute, it wasn't consecrated. You know, I don't know. I'm not Catholic, so I don't know. But I would think that, you know, in order for it to be something, maybe if you're Catholic, you can weigh in on this. I don't understand that part of it. Why? But nevertheless, it created a, the guy who jumps down to grab it after he, after Michael Stewart throws it on the ground, they started kicking and beating him, and so then the police arrested this guy, Michael Stewart, and people that were with him. Several counter protesters confronted him.

Police tackled Stewart, led him away, after he and another man began shoving each other. The Satanic grotto originally got permission to hold its black mass inside the building, but then the Kansas governor, Laura Kelly, ordered the event moved outside due to concerns about its content. The non-profit Satanic Corporation planned to hand out miniature black mass kits, including, they said, consecrated bread and wine. I don't know where they got that from. They break it.

Is that what they broke into the Catholic Church for? They'd have to steal it, right? So several hundred people were there to protest them. Twenty people came in support of him. But he got what he wanted, which was attention. Stuart said he didn't believe in Satan as a spiritual entity. Well, wait and see. He just wanted to show that religious freedom is for everyone. No, he wants to show

that religious freedom is for no one, especially Christians. This whole point is they're not about religious freedom. They are doing this to shut down religious freedom. They're deliberately shut down religious freedom. They're deliberately hateful and provocative because they want to shut down religious freedom. That's why they're doing it. The Kansas House of Representatives on Thursday passed a 101 to 15 vote, a resolution condemning the planned event as an act of anti-Catholic bigotry. 15 people voted against that. What is against that. I wonder if they're gonna those Democrats I can guarantee you that they're Democrats if they're gonna get

re-elected or not. A Catholic man stopped the Satanists again from further desecrating the Eucharist by jumping on it and eating it and then that's where the fistfight was. So again, he got violent. That is also a crime. But evidently, at least there, they weren't coming after him for a hate crime. They came after him for violence. That's a real crime. So I just gotta say, if you don't know Catholic terminology and don't know what the host is, that headline is horrifying. Yeah. Consumes host. It wasn't mine about a podcast, yeah. I went and put it past them, given half a chance, these Satanists.

Anyway, the Satanic Temple in Idaho is challenging an abortion ban on behalf of quote, involuntarily pregnant women. So this is a different satanic group that is in Idaho. The Idaho Attorney General's office argued that the out of state group lacks standing to bring the suit as it has no actual in-person facilities within the state. They don't have the facilities to do this in person, he said. They have no plans to get facilities to do this in person. But they're in New Mexico, so what they're going to do is these abortion pills by mail.

And we know how that works out, don't we? By the way, there's an interesting sub-note here. LifeSite News points out that it was during the first Trump administration that the IRS recognized this satanic group as a quote-unquote church, granting it tax-exempt status and strengthening its claims for religious accommodation. And let me just say this. They will always say, �We don't believe in Satan. We're the Church of Satan and we worship Satan, but we don't believe in Satan.� Well,

then you're not a church. You don't have any religious beliefs. So it is not a Church by their own admission. And that's, I think, the basis on which we challenge them. Say, this is not about your religious freedom, because you just said that you don't believe any of this stuff. So one woman who nearly died from getting one of these pills, one of these abortion pills, said she is fed up with her lies. She hemorrhaged from the pill abortion, and she has had a demonstration over the weekend, calling for Planned Parenthood's complete defunding. She describes it as a death facility.

So the Senator filled her with false hopes that the abortion would give her an already unstable relationship, a fighting chance, and then nearly killed her. These people are dispensing this stuff, and this is something that's happening, without an examination. They don't know what kind of complications there might be. They don't know how large the baby is and all the rest of the stuff. They don't care about the women. They don't care what kind of complications there might be. They don't know how large the baby is and all the rest of the stuff. They don't care about the women. They don't care about their health.

Women can die from this, and they don't care. Muslim woman has killed a Christian couple by poisoning their food. Why'd she do that? They took her daughter to church. The Christian couple, the woman, was pregnant. And when she poisoned the food of this Christian family, this happened in Kenya, Nairobi, when she poisoned the family, her 18-year-old daughter that they had taken to church also died from the poison.

Yeah, there's a lot of hate out there, isn't it? But of course the crime was murder. And Oklahoma, a battle over religion and schools in Oklahoma could decide the future the First Amendment. The long-time understanding of the separation of church and state rights, NBC News. I would say the long-term misunderstanding of the separation of

church and state. They quoted the head of the Republican head of the school system there in Oklahoma. He said, what I'm trying to do is make sure that our kids understand American history. I want them to have the freedom to express their religious beliefs in schools.� That�s what it�s about. It�s about the free exercise of religion, a God-given right that is recognized specifically in the Constitution. So he says, �I want them to have the freedom to express their religious beliefs in school.� I believe that that has been absolutely gutted from our school system, and it has, based on this nonsense of the separation of church and state that is based on a letter that Thomas

Jefferson sent to the Danbury Baptists, and they never talk about what that was all really about. Instead, that was used by the Supreme Court in the mid-20th century to begin a purging campaign to purge religion out of the school. Same thing that the temple of satans or all these satanic temples are trying to do everywhere. Purge religion out of the school. To take away your right to the free exercise of religion.

As a matter of fact, you've got one of these atheist organizations that they're constantly suing people and trying to shut things down. They call themselves the Freedom From Religion Foundation. That's not what the Constitution says. The Constitution says we have a freedom of religion. Not about that at all. So he said, I want them to have the freedom to express their religious beliefs in school. That's been absolutely gutted from our school system.� Under his watch, the state has approved the first ever religious virtual public charter school. Now, that's evidently what this is over. He has also proposed placing Bibles in schools. And again, you've got judges who will say you cannot take the pornographic

literature that is targeted towards children. You can't take out the gender gaslighting literature that is targeted towards kids. You've got to leave that in. But you can't put it in the Bible. That's what our government run schools are really about. And people need to understand that, that no matter what some person in one place does, that is what these institutions have become. They are thoroughly rotten. They have rotted, yes, from the top down, but putting somebody up at the top now is not going to get rid of that rot.

It's just going to get people to trust that rotten institution. NBC says, at the heart of the religious school case and others like it is the Constitutional First Amendment. They are the Establishment Clause, which forbids the government from endorsing one religion over another. No, no, that is not the Establishment Clause. Or setting up its own church? That is the Establishment Clause.

And as I've said it before, you had, when this country was founded, the original colonies, it was a major motivation for the founding of America by Europeans was freedom of religion. And because they had been persecuted in various states, all these different states had an official state religion. So a lot of the New England states were Congregationalist, and Rhode Island it was Baptist, and Pennsylvania it was Quakers, and Maryland it was Catholic, and so forth. And so you had different states had established religions. Now the Bill of Rights and the Constitution when it was done in 1789 did not end that because in Massachusetts

and several other states it continued for several more decades. It went up to I think the 1840s. I don't have the numbers in front of me now and I forget what it is. But in Massachusetts they continued to have an established religion. What does that mean? That means that it was the official state religion, and you were required to pay money to that denomination, and in some cases you were required to attend. I used to bring this up when we would go up to Williamsburg. Remember that? I would always talk to the Jefferson character there. And again, he's not going

to engage me on this. He would always pretend, well, I don't know what you're talking about, that type of thing. He would try to stay in character. But I would always say, and I brought it up to him two or three times once it was at a conservative think tank. And the conservative think tank didn't want to talk about that either. But he, I would say, well, you were very big on freedom of religion. And I said, you also, I did not want to have an established religion, but I said, you've also established a university there there started giving money to it And so I said do you think that an established? Network of schools is

Fundamentally different than an established religion because they're gonna be teaching values and the rest of this stuff And so yeah, he would not engage on that but I fundamentally see it as the same thing You're not going to have free freedom of, freedom of speech if you have state-controlled education. That's the whole purpose of state-controlled education, is to tell people what to think, to indoctrinate them, not to make them critical thinkers, not to elevate freedom, that type of thing. No, it is antithetical to that.

And whether it's being done by conservatives or by liberals, they all hope to mold the students using the power of the state to think in a particular way. We should be very concerned about that. Even if it's somebody who thinks like you, even if somebody who has your same values, your same religion right now, that isn't going to remain that way. And so this is the lie from NBC in one little phrase, to say that separation of church and state is to, you cannot endorse one religion over another. No, you can.

That's covered under free speech. You can't endorse one religion over the other. You cannot establish it. And that's what they don't establish is what establishment is. Establishment means that you're forced to go to that church, attend it, and you're forced and or forced to pay for that church. And the Constitution did not stop that at the state level. As I said, for decades Massachusetts and some other states continued to have official state

churches. What it did was it told Congress, it told the federal government, that the federal government could not choose one of the many different state religions and make that the federal religion. That's all it did. And this whole thing about the 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptist, they asked him, because there had been a lot of misinformation in the campaign from John Adams saying, Jefferson's got his own Bible, he's going to go out and confiscate Bibles, and he's going to do this and that. So they said, are you going to do any of that stuff?

He says, no. He said, there is a wall of separation between me and your church. In other words, the wall was built around the federal government, not around the church. And what the Supreme Court did in the middle of the 20th century was to put a wall around the church and to put prohibitions around individuals as to what they could say. Just because you're a federal employee doesn't mean that you can't, that you have surrendered your free exercise of religion. Any more than being a federal employee means that you have to take the Trump shot that violates your religious beliefs or that violates your common

sense because it hasn't been tested. So no, it's not about that at all. And yet as they say, Walters and others like him, believe the Supreme Court got it wrong in the past. They did. They point out the First Amendment itself says nothing about a wall of separation and they focus more on their rights under the free exercise clause. Well, at least NBC gives you the counter viewpoint and that is it. But it is that viewpoint that, well, you can't endorse a religion. In other words, you can't

exercise religion. You can't say, I believe this. I can't believe that. You can't say, Christ is King, for example. Oh no, we're going to make that hate speech. The attorney general there in Oklahoma, a Republican also has vigorously opposed the religious schools plan. And so it's a Republican who is pushing back against that. So when we look at where this is going to move in the future, I think a good example of where the real issues are is in terms of this, what has now become like an Easter ritual for people at the Daily Wire.

It began a year ago saying just before Easter, you can't say Christ is King, in response to Candace Owen and an argument that she was having with Ben Shapiro. And so that was a kerfuffle that came up last year. It's like, okay, well, regardless of whether I don't really care to debate about what Candace Owens meant by that. She was doing that because she was a Christian, or if she was doing that because she was pushing back in the disagreement that she had with Ben Shapiro over what was going on in political Israel and Gaza. I don't really care about that.

But isn't it interesting that here we are, essentially a year to the day later, you have the people of the Daily Wire bringing this stuff up again. It's like every Easter, you're going to have the people of the Daily Wire tell you to shut up, you can't say Christ is King? Well, you know, it is, as I said before, to say that it is used by radicals, to say that it is used by people who have hatred towards Jews or whatever, who cares? I don't care. It doesn't change anything. Christ is King, and it doesn't change anything.

As a matter of fact, He's King of Kings. And whether the KKK grabs a cross and burns it, that doesn't change the meaning of the cross for me or for any Christian. And if we allow that to happen, think how effective that is for Satan and for the enemies of Christ to shut us down, to shame us if we do it voluntarily, if we submit to that, or to use the government to shut us down, to say that what you're doing is anti-Semitic. And again, these people on the right, like Ben Shapiro and the Daily Wire, are acting exactly like the radicals on the left.

If you disagree with them politically, they immediately play the race card. Well, you're racist, you're a white supremacist, you're anti-Semitic, all the rest of the stuff. The people on the left and people on the right are exactly the same, and they're all using allegations of hate to take away our free speech and our free exercise of religion. So Johnny Moore, who is a pastor somewhere, I guess, has urged the church to reclaim Christ as King ahead of Easter Sunday. There are extremists, there are botnet works that are trying to co-opt this, but again, it doesn't matter.

Somebody will always do that. Just think how easy it would be to shut our name, shut us down if we can't say his name. And again, it's people like Jordan Peterson who's there. When I look at the Daily Wire, I mean, has it really become a synagogue of Satan? Take a look at Dave Rubin, openly homosexual and yet he is lauded by the Daily Wire, he's lauded by many of these conservatives because that's the only thing that matters, is that he is a Republican. And his politics matter. But his morality doesn't matter.

And we're going to say that morality is unimportant, only if politics matter. Well then you're talking about politics, you're not talking about religion. And they're trying to play this ethnic card, they're trying to play a race card, they're trying to play a religion card. And you know folks, it's simply about politics. So they've elevated him. They've got Jordan Peterson, who is in a sense echoing the Germans who used higher criticism against the Bible. Well, I'm going to � oh, look at the Bible. I'm going to say, �I don't believe this and I don't believe that.�

What Jordan Peterson is also doing, he's combining kind of the 19th century German higher criticism with an occultic mysticism. And that's really what Jungian psychiatry is. That's what Jordan Peterson is into. He's not a follower of Freud. He's a follower of Carl Jung. And since I don't give a whit about what these so-called psychologists say. I never bothered to, I always knew that Freud thought everything was about sex. Everything was about sexual desire or sexual repression or whatever.

I realized what Jung was about when RFK Jr. was talking about his mystical, uh, connection that got him off of his addiction to drugs. I think it was heroin that he was addicted to, I'm not sure. And he was describing Carl Jung's experience where he had some kind of an event where this butterfly appeared at his window when this was the kind of butterfly that wasn't supposed to be in Scandinavia wherever Jung was and he saw that as a

mystical message from the universe about something that he was struggling with to make it and so RFK jr. Was saying essentially the same thing. Yeah, same thing can happen to me, you know, so This is a kind of occultic mysticism. This isn't Christianity. And you know, when Jordan Peterson and a lot of people were hopeful, I was too, when he started talking about the importance and majesty of Christ. He said, ìI'm going to read the Bible and everything.î But then he starts getting back into, you start to realize pretty soon that he is really looking at all this through a kind of Jungian mysticism and a cult attitude. And so he's taken the lead now and saying you can't say Christ is king because some

hateful people have used it in a hateful way. Well, Jordan, you don't get to tell me what I do. And you don't get to define what Christianity is. You're not a follower of Christ. You're a follower of some dead psychologist who has dead ideas, vain ideas. And so then you've got Ben Shapiro who elevates political Israel as an object of worship. Again, he has said he doesn't believe that Moses is part of the sea. He doesn't even believe the Bible.

Yeah, he wants the land. He's going to believe that promise and he's going to take the land. So this is what we're looking at, this synagogue of Satan, the daily wire, that is pushing this thing to gag people to say you can't say Christ is King. And pushing censorship, by the way. Almost one year to the day, another daily wire figure is among the authors of a new report warning extremist actors have co-opted Christian language. No, they haven't.

It's some organization coming out of Rutgers, the Network Contagion Research Institute. What a pretentious load of nonsense that is. And so anyway, he's pushing back this guy, and again, I don't know who he is. Johnny Moore is president of the Congress of Christian Leaders, whatever that is. So they released their report pushing back on Jordan Peterson's report. Well, I see your report and I raise you a report. And I don't really care who calls who's bluff. I'm not in that poker game.

It doesn't matter to me what either side says about any of this stuff. It all began with a Daily Wire podcaster, Andrew Clovan, also Jewish who doesn't like the idea that Jesus would be king. He said the phrase was being used in an anti-Semitic attack in the wake of the outlets firing of Candace Owens. And so as evidence of this, again they say, well, Nick Fuentes has said this and Jake Shields and so forth. Again, it doesn't matter.

It doesn't matter what these people say. According to the report, nearly half of all ex-posts using the phrase Christ is King are driven by figures promoting hateful narratives. So, they have this research organization at Reuters and it determines that you are a hateful person and that if you are a hateful person and you say Christ is King, then the rest of us have to shut up about it. Sorry, it doesn't work that way. And we should never be ashamed of Christ.

We should never be ashamed of the fact that he is King. And we should never care one whit about these reports or these groups or about the Daily Wire or the rest of this stuff. Listen to the nonsense they're putting out. Well, had a spike around Easter of 2024. I wonder why people be saying Christ is King around Easter time, right? Or the time that we celebrate the resurrection of Christ. It's become increasingly hateful since at least 2021, with a historic maximum of 17.3%

in May of 2024. What nonsense! What utter nonsense! Anyway, so, but what Moore is saying is right. He's encouraged believers to proclaim the truth that Jesus is King of Kings without reservation. He said, �My whole call to action was my hope that many, many millions of Christians would actually say Christ is King more than ever as a means of, in effect, taking back

the phrase from a small group of people that want to use it in a way that is targeting Jews. Well fine. If everybody wants to post that there, then that's going to take down their algorithm. Do you care about this Rutgers group and what they think? Do you care about their 17.3% stuff? I don't care at all about that. If I post Christ as King, it will be because I believe Christ is King. Not because I am trying to change a poll or an algorithm. I

don't care about any of that stuff. He says, �I do hope that Catholics and Evangelicals this Easter will post either Christ as King or Jesus as Lord so loud, so frequently, so sincerely, that these threats of hate become irrelevant.� You know, that is not really this Easter will post either Christ as King or Jesus as Lord so loud, so frequently, so sincerely that these threats of hate become irrelevant." You know, that is not really where our war is to that extent on social media. And, you know, just throwing slogans and memes at each other isn't anything that really is going to be helpful, I don't think. The bottom line is people can tell if you're sincere or not. If you don't really care about anybody and you want to hand them a religious tract, that doesn't make any difference to them. And so, they need to see us living it, because if

we don't live it, we don't believe it. And if we don't believe it, why should they? So as all this is happening, just keep in mind that we have in Israel a civil war. Israel is not a monolithic thing, except to people who view it from afar, and who have bad theology and bad eschatology. They want to see it as some monolithic thing. And they want to combine all of Israel. You want to talk about somebody just say, �Well, I think all Jews are like this or all Jews are like that.� Well, that's really what the Christian Zionists are doing. They're lumping all Jews together.

And what we're talking about that is happening in Israel and with Netanyahu is political. There's a lot of Netanyahu hooligans who are now doxing people. They're using biometric surveillance and stasi tactics to try to get people deported for speech. Look, if somebody is violent, absolutely deport them. Like I said before, somebody breaks into a church, breaking and entering and then breaking stuff on the inside and vandalizing it, that's a crime. And if people are doing violent, real crime, but hate is not a crime. Speech is not a crime. And I've got a real problem with these Netanyahu ligands who are out there trying to make free

speech a crime, who are trying to destroy our First Amendment rights. When in Israel itself, they're on the verge of a civil war and have been for quite some time. They were on the verge of a civil war before Hamas and this is one of the reasons why a lot of people believe that Netanyahu allowed this to happen and that the Hamas situation was engineered to a large degree

by conservatives who wanted to have a very radical group in control so they could go in and take Gaza and take the land. After years of warnings from former Israeli leaders and intelligence chiefs that Netanyahu is leading Israel into self-destruction, numerous reports now claim that Israel is on the brink of civil war. This is LifeSite News. Last week, the former Israeli Supreme Court Chief Justice said, quote, Israel is very close to civil war. The rift in the nation is enormous. No effort is being made to heal it, and everyone is trying to exacerbate it.

So which Israel are we talking about here? Again, there are different...this is a political issue, it is a civil issue, it could be a civil war. Netanyahu had to hold, I think, three different elections before he could finally put together a coalition to govern. And there has been this animosity. He's firing attorney generals and defying the Supreme Court and this and that. And so, for Americans to say,

well, I'll just follow Israel, well, which one? Which one? I mean, are you talking about spiritual Israel? Are you talking about ethnic Israel? Are you talking about political Israel? And there are multiple facets of each of those things. So what Israel are you talking about? And don't tell me that I can't speak freely in this country

because of quote unquote Israel. Which one? Is it the Netanyahu faction that's out there? So Netanyahu said there will be no civil war on March the 21st. Well, I guess that ends it. Nevertheless, former Prime Minister Ehud Omer said the foundations of the state in Israel are shaking. We are closer to a civil war than people realize.� And his latest move, Netanyahu's, was to dismiss Ronin Barr, head of Shin Bet, which is their security services. They, by the way, took the blame for Hamas, but also said Netanyahu shared the blame. So he fired the head of Shin Bet. His firing of the head of Shin Bet has now been blocked by the Supreme Court. So again there's a fight between the executive branch and

the Supreme Court. Israel's Channel 12 reports the extremist National Security Minister Ben Gavir attacked the head of the Shin Bet, Ronan Barr, and tried to strangle him. I mean, this is just a thing. Talk about a Civil War. This is like going back to just before our Civil War when you had Preston Brooks. I forget if he was the one who used the cane or if he was the one who was caned. This one, on the house on the floor, you had one congressman beating another one with a cane or if he was the one who was caned. This one on the house on the floor. You had one congressman beating another one with a cane.

Here the guy trying to strangle him with his bare hands. The head of Mossad and the Israeli army chief of staff had to intervene to stop the fighting from continuing. On herets they said Smotryk might deny it, but Israel's right is preparing for a civil war. Netanyahu is leading us into a civil war, said Heretz. That is what he wants. It will serve his purposes.

Fire in the streets will strengthen him and increase the size of the national camp, which will unite around him. That's what war always does. The war with Gaza has strengthened Netanyahu. A civil war would strengthen him as well. It will do the same thing to Trump. A civil war will enable him to make people forget about all of his terrible failures – the October 7 massacre, abandoning the hostages, and Qatar Gate.

The anarchy in the streets will also serve as a good excuse for canceling the elections of 2026 if the polls predict him losing. So the worst case scenario is upon us said one individual who is associated with the other party. Israel's government has just decided to declare non-confidence in Attorney General Gali Baharav Meirah. Since there's no such thing in Israeli law, the decision simply means that she will be fired. So here we are. He's trying to fire the head of Shembet.

He's trying to fire the Attorney General. Supreme Court is fighting him. Again, which Israel are we supposed to bow down and worship? I'm confused. I don't know which of these false gods I'm supposed to worship. A random scroll through social media will reveal the intensity of the anger and the resentment held by each side toward the other. A mixture of contempt, glee, violent language is a common sight among both media professionals

and public leaders. So the Supreme Court of Israel has frozen Netanyahu's dismissal of Ronin Barr and opposes his move to dismiss the Attorney General as well. So again, it is not monolithic. It is not settled. And just keep that in mind when somebody wants to tell you what you may or may not say. On Rumble, Khan Think, thank you very much. He said, just out of principle, you should end the Rockfin broadcast.

Rockfin is profiting off of your hard work. Viva la capitalism. Well, we are going to stop it because we don't want people to mistakenly make a – if they don't hear the announcement of what happened, as I said before, we've got donations that are tied up there that we can't count because they got put in – Rockfin puts them into a cryptocurrency for which there's no buyers right now. I don't know if that's going to change. Yeah, we'll be phasing it out over the next week or two.

We just want to give people enough time to migrate over to a different platform that they enjoy. Yeah, it's been a very good platform for us and we've had a good strong community there and we don't want to just disappear, because people think that the broadcasts have been shut down so we're gonna try to phase it out. I just wanna let people know. So if you are on Rockfin, try heading over to Rumble.

Make yourself an account there, join the chat. We've got a great community of people. It's a lot of fun. Yeah, yeah, it is, it is. It is a great community. On Rumble, Atomic Dog, thank you for the tip. He says, Rock Van doesn't deserve your support. David, never mess with a man's money. It's something my dad always says. And he says, thank you for the matching funds. And again, we want to thank Mary Ellen Moore, freemindfilms.com, who is matching the funds this month and really is

kind of her to do that. I appreciate that. On Rumble, Garrett Sashay says, David, keep up the excellent work. We appreciate you not pandering to MAGA. We want to hear honest opinions. Well, thank you. I may not always be right, as I said, but I'll tell you what I honestly think and I'll tell you why I think that.

On Rumble, Brandon, Grateful Baptist says, �Please pray for me. I've been battling a neurological condition. The doctor said has no cure and has been getting worse. I'm really struggling and it's really hard to work. And I'm scared to be honest, but I know that God loves me. That's the key thing. We don't know what this life holds. And we never know why we're going through things like that. When you look at Job, he struggled. He didn't understand what was happening. But at the end of his life, he had twice as much

of everything as he had taken away from him at the beginning of the story. And that includes especially his family. You know, he had the Bible enumerates all of his goats and his cattle and all the rest is scuff and he's got twice as much of that and servants and things like that. But he wound up with exactly the same number of children that he had at the beginning, except he still had the children who had passed on. And so we don't understand why these things that are happening are happening to us. And I

understand it's fine to be scared. And we'll be praying for you, Brandon. And I'm so sorry that that is happening. But again, just go back to the fact that God loves you. And this is, and just ask him what he's trying to teach you in this instead of why is this happening to me? You know, what are you trying to teach me? Because that's what this life is about. It's about God teaching us. And it's about us learning to trust him every day.

And sometimes these challenges are really huge. I really am sorry to see that happening. On Rumble, Ephesians 6-12, thank you very much for the tip. And he thanks us. Thank you very much. On Rumble, Junk Silver, thank you very much. He says, thanks for matching today, Mary. I think it's better to keep the show on Rockven.

The more ears this reaches, the better. Yeah, that's true. I mean, you know, I don't know what's happening there. We wanted to wait it out and see if they got it together because we had problems with rumble at one point in time. But that's been solved and we thought, well, maybe they will solve it. But it concerns me when people are tipping. That's the only thing and I don't know how to turn that. we don't have the ability to not accept tips on Rockfan and

People think they're supporting the program and they're not and That's that's the issue by the way. I want to thank junk silver. Thank you very much and I've got a list of people who sent checks and Junk silver is right at the top. Thank you so much Chuck and Robin. Thank you so much. Chuck and Robin, thank you. Mary N, Kelly M, Imelda D, Jackie and Fred U, Peter G, Gary K, and thank you also for the coin. Gary, appreciate that. That's very generous, all of that. Matt and Monica and Aaron F. Thank you, all all of you for the last week of March.

Those are the checks that we got the last week of March. And finally, Obermenschk, thank you very much for the tip on Rumble. It says, no retreat, no surrender. That's right. Well, you know, we go back and we look at history. What was it? One of the rallying cries of the Americans at the time was no king but Jesus. And now we're told by supposedly Christian,

not Christian, supposedly conservative, yeah, Daily Wire's not Christian at all. But by supposedly conservative organization, we're told you can't say Christ is king. Our American society was based on that. No king but Jesus, Yes, Christ is King. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. The You're listening to the David Knight Show. On Rumble, Sam Miller, 123.

Thank you very much. I appreciate it. That's very generous. He says, thank you for speaking the truth, for encouraging words 123. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. That's very generous. He says, thank you for speaking the truth for encouraging words about Christ. Hope this helps. It does. Thank you very much. He says, blessings to all.

That is a blessing. I want to talk about this trial balloon of ethics that's been thrown out by MIT. And it was at the top of Drudge. I had a lot of people forward the articles to me. What Drudge focused on was an article from The Sun which sensationalized some of this stuff, saying, well, we've got this idea that we could have body-oids is what they call it. That we're going to grow human beings in artificial wombs and grow them from stem cells and so forth and so on. And we'll use them for spare parts.

We'll use them for organ transfers. We might use them to test drugs and things like that. You know, a lot of these. And we might use them for meat, is what the Sun says. Well, I'm not quite so sure that that's what they were saying when I looked at the study, but nevertheless it was off the charts in terms of ethics, in terms of lack of ethics I should say, whether they want to use these body weights for meat or not. And of course, we are living in a time when we have been, we've grown up watching entertainment, dystopian science fiction novels, and these people are doing their best to make every single one of these things come to reality. Soylent Green, of course, that's

why we're talking about this. I was curious, I thought, why are they coming up with this term Soylent? What does that even mean? And so supposedly it was a combination of soy and lentils and that's what they were telling people it was. But in reality it was actually cannibalism, recycled people. And in the movie, the movie is based on a book, a 1966 novel, The movie is based on a book, a 1966 novel, Make Room, Make Room. And you know, overpopulation, so we've got to have make room for people, we've got to kill off people. Soylent was less sinister right then, it was just soy and lentil. They kept the Soylent and then when they put it in the movie, they made it a lot more sinister.

The movie that was done in 73, the adaptation of the book that was done seven years earlier. But what is it that MIT Technology Review is proposing? And I think that this really is just a probe of public opinion and of the state of public opinion on ethics. of the State of Public Opinion on Ethics. This is the title of their report, Ethically Sourced, and they don't put ethics or ethically sourced. They don't put that in quotes. So I say, ethically sourced, spare human bodies could revolutionize medicine. The spare is in quotes, but the ethics is not in quotes.

And they should put it in quotes because the ethics are quite questionable. It would maybe be a spare human body, but the ethics are really questionable and made me think of Prince Andrew, or at least the guy who's formerly known as Prince, who wrote his own book called Spare. That's what he referred to himself as, you know, in case the older brother died, I'm the spare that they have here to take the crown. Uh, but the report says, so why do so few drugs that enter clinical trials receive regulatory approval? Why is the waiting list for organ transplants so long?

These challenges stem in large part from a common root cause, a severe shortage of ethically sourced human bodies. And so they think that creating stem cells, creating bodies from stem cells, growing them from stem cells, they think that that would be ethical. And this gets to the whole issue of what are we? And I've had this discussion before with people who are selling transhumanism. These are people who look at us as some kind of an accident of nature, as complicated and as complex and as complementary as all of the different things in our existence are. I mean, when I say complementary, just look at sexual reproduction.

How in the world could that evolve? It's all got to be there at once or it doesn't work. And one of the things I enjoyed when I was doing homeschooling with the kids, Answers in Genesis has some great curriculum with it. As I've said in the past, when I was going through school, they dumbed down biology into comparative anatomy, looking at skeletons even, not even the functioning of the amazing functioning of very, very different animals. They just would look at the skeletons and say, �Well, this skeleton looks like that skeleton, so one must have evolved from the other one.� Well, the other alternative

is that they have a common creator, a common designer. And when you actually look at it from that perspective, one of the things that the Curriculum and Answers in Genesis had that I really loved and anxious to do this with my grandson is the fact that they would talk about the uniqueness of all these different animals. Look at the giraffe with its long neck. And it's got a special thing under the brain to keep it from blacking out when it's got a massive heart that pumps all that blood to the

head that's up so high. And so you might be concerned that a giraffe would have this rush of blood and lose consciousness when it dips down to drink some water? Well, it turns out there's kind of a spongy-like thing that absorbs all that rush of pressure in their brain.

Only giraffes have that, designed specifically for them. Or take a look at a woodpecker. Why is it that a woodpecker can beat its head against the, at a rapid rate, incessantly against the wood, and not pass out. It's also got a kind of cushion there. And it has a long, sticky tongue that after it gets a hole, it can go in there probing for insects.

Now what good would a long, sticky tongue do it if it didn't have the ability to create that hole? And it's got feet that let it latch on vertically onto a trunk. All these different things. Even the bombardier beetle, right? You got a bombardier beetle, puts these chemicals together and they have a little bomb that explodes. Well, how could that evolve? Right? If you got those specific chemicals that would make an explosion, if they came together in the beetle, the beetle itself would explode. I mean, there's all these different things throughout nature that are fascinating to

look at how the organisms actually work. But what they had us looking at in biology was skeletons. They didn't consider the unique function of these things. And so when you look at these bodyoids, this is a mentality that is rampant in so-called science that essentially removes life out of the equation. Where does life come from? What is life? What is our consciousness?

And so they look at this and they take the same approach that Aldous Huxley did in Brave New World saying we can make sure that these individuals don't have functioning brains. And again, there's not any program that we know of. I don't know, maybe some of these Silicon Valley people have got something going on the side that they're keeping hidden from us. I wouldn't be surprised. But what they're doing is this part of it is a trial balloon to see how people are going to react.

And so as they look at this, let me get this a little bit larger, small print here. So it said, �It could be disturbing to characterize human bodies in commodifying terms, but the unavoidable reality is that the human biological materials are essentially commodities in medicine.� Well, that's part of their problem, isn't it? It's one of the reasons why, because they have treated – think about this. You know, you go back to the Frankenstein movies, right? There's a big deal about the body snatchers. We've got to – they call the guys that would go out, the doctors would pay them to go dig up a recently dead

body, and they call these guys resurrectionists, right? They bring them in so they could do comparative anatomy studies and things like that, have cadavers to study anatomy with. Well, it starts out that way, and they continue to look at cadavers and people and bodies as a commodity. And what you wind up with is where we are today. We have pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer look at living people as commodities. That they're just there for their own enrichment financially, their own profit. That's where this eventually leads.

And so they said in this MIT study, they said, more than 100,000 patients are currently waiting for a solid organ transplant in the US alone. It forces us to rely on animals and medical science. And then also the safety and efficacy of any experimental drug must still be confirmed in clinical trials on living human bodies, does it? I thought that was over. Didn't we get rid of that? Yeah, we did get rid of that, didn't we? I mean now the USDA is approving vaccines for animals that we eat. So it can take a decade or longer to complete. No, you just say it's an emergency and we're going to do it at warp speed and I'm going to skip all the tests. That's what Trump did.

And they said that when they do that, they only get approval 15% of the time. You think if they would have taken a decade to get the approval for the mRNA stuff, you think it would have passed? Of course not. It wouldn't have even been close. So to say that we need to grow human bodies because we've got to test drugs, what a joke that is. Where have these people been? You know, they're selling you stuff here with this. And so when you talk about safety and the efficacy of this, they talk about organ transplants and so forth, then they talk about the commodifying of humans. But they never talk about what a human is.

And this is what these transhumanists won't do either. Zoltan Isfahan, I interviewed him at the transhumanist party and I engaged him on that. I said, so what is a human? What is consciousness? Is the what is a human? What is consciousness? Is the brain simply a computer? Is it simply like RAM and ROM? And you can somehow, if you can grab those stored electrical charges somehow, you can reproduce who I am?

Is that all that I am? Well, of course, it all begs the question as to who created the computer, right? If you see somebody's computer, you might ask them. If you don't see the label or you don't recognize the case, you might ask them who built it, but you don't think that that computer just assembled itself out of random chance processes, do you?

Nobody does. And so the question is, how did we get to this point? There might be a way to get out of this moral and scientific deadlock, they said. Well, actually, they don't have the way. They said, within the realm of plausibility that we could do something like this. So let's think about the ethics involved in it. They said, you could use stem cells to create structures that seem to mimic the early development of actual human embryos. At the same time, artificial

uterus technology is rapidly advancing. That's something to worry about. Seriously. That when the government can design humans, what do you think they're going to do to natural humans? Other pathways may be opening to allow for the development of fetuses outside of the body, together outside of marriage, outside of the family, outside of motherhood. Our government, folks, the CIA, our government has been focused on destroying the family my entire life. Deliberately.

It is a calculated campaign to destroy the family, to destroy motherhood. It's been very successful. Most women don't even want to get married, let alone have children. Very successful. And all of that is preparation for them to be able to do a brave new world. And so now we have MIT pushing this as an ethical test. So they said, together with established genetic techniques to inhibit brain development, we could make it possible to envision the creation of bodyoids, a potentially unlimited source

of human bodies developed entirely outside of a human body made out of stem cells that would lack sentience or the ability to feel pain. Hmm, the epsilons of Brave New World, right? That was what Huxley said. Well, you know, we're gonna have hatcheries. We're going to have the government Well, you know, we're going to have hatcheries, we're going to have the government create these babies. And I think in the novel they deprived certain ones of oxygen.

They wanted to have an alpha class that was going to be super smart so they would give them enhanced materials because again, all of this in their mind is simply material. God is out of the equation in all of this. And so they would give some of them enhanced nutrients and others they would remove those nutrients from them. They said it's essentially cloning someone's biological material to empower that transplanted tissues are perfect immunological match. You see this has been a long-standing, if you want to know about the ethics of this stuff, this is the long-standing ethics, so-called, of the abortion industry. Well, it's just a clump of tissues. Well, it doesn't feel pain.

Well, it doesn't have consciousness, even to the extent that you've had some of these so-called ethicists saying, �Well, we think that you could abort babies up to the ages of two or three.� Now, if this guy has ever had a child or looked at a child � close up � and I think about this all the time. I look at Travis' son � how could you look at a baby, and even a baby, he's only like four months old, I guess. Yeah. Almost five.

Almost five. Well, you know, you think about it, there are babies that were five months older than him that are being ripped apart. I look at that all the time and think, what a monstrous evil that is. These people are talking about doing the same thing. We will grow a baby, we'll make sure that doesn't feel pain, we'll make sure it doesn't know anything. Oh you will?

And then we'll use it for your benefit and we'll clone it from you and we might have something that is an exact genetic replica of you, a spare, so that we can test these drugs on your spare and see what it does to your spare, so that you don't get hurt by the drug. You know, they do it in a general case, but they do it in a specific individualized case. This is the ultimate commodification and it appeals to our selfishness, our desire to live forever,

our desire to be lovers of self, essentially cloning somebody's biological material to ensure that transplanted tissues are a perfect immunological match, a personalized screening of drugs. We can even envision using animal bodyoids in agriculture as a substitute for the use of sentient animal species." Well, you know, that's basically what Bill Gates had been talking about in terms of lab meat. They're just not talking about, I don't think at this point in time, who knows, but I don't think that they're talking about humans as lab meat. But I wouldn't put the possibility past them.

They said exciting possibilities exist. Yeah, we can't be sure whether such body-oids can survive without ever having developed brains though, or the parts of brains associated with consciousness. Body-oids could address many ethical questions in modern medicine, offering ways to avoid unnecessary pain and suffering. We do not allow broad research on people who no longer have consciousness or in some cases never had it. Oh, so we'd have to change some of those things here.

But at the same time, we know that much can be gained from studying the human body and doing that with people who have passed on. But again, it brings us back to what are we? Even animals have a spirit, right? They have what I would think of as a soul. In other words, they have will, they In other words, they have will, they have the part of the unconscious part of the body that is the brain that is organizing, all the different parts of the body to operate, but also they do have will, and they do have basic animal instincts, and so do we. We have all that, but we have something else. We have something else that is created in the image of God. And so that is the question, you know, exactly what are we? Are we simply a bunch of electronic signals?

Are we a clump of tissues? No, I don't think we're any of that. These people really don't understand what we are, but they have a call for action. They said, until recently the idea of making something like a bodyoid would have been relegated to the realm of science fiction and philosophical speculation, but now it is at least plausible, possibly revolutionary, and it's time for it to be explored. It's time for it to be shut down, this idea. This is an abomination that anything like this would even be proposed. And it shows you how far we have gone. Look, it's not the people you got to be concerned about. It's not these attention-grabbing media whores at the temple of Satan. It's these people, these people. They're the ones pushing the real satanic agenda.

There is no need to start with humans. We can begin exploring the feasibility of this approach with rodents or other research animals. And then work our way up to humans, you know. As we proceed, the ethical and social issues are at least as important as the scientific ones. Just because something can be done does not mean that it should be done. Of course it shouldn't be done. But again, as I said, it's been sensationalized by the Sun in the UK. Over my dead... this is their headline out

of all that... Over my dead body. Spare human bodies grown in artificial wombs and lab as scientists insist body-oids feel no pain and can serve as meat." And again that is sensationalizing and spinning this even beyond what these people are talking about. But the boils down to three things. Testing drugs, which they don't do now anymore, right? The FDA exists to give legal cover to these people. And even when you talk about the black box labels for things like antibiotics and things like that, they exist to give legal immunity

to the FDA for not doing its job and to the pharmaceutical companies who are willing to treat you as if you were a bodyoid to do whatever they wish to you to make money. So that's why they put the black box labels on. And then the doctors don't tell you, the hospital doesn't tell you, the pharmacist doesn't tell you. So they say, go sue the doctor, the pharmacist, or the hospital.

But hey, the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies have taken care of each other. They've given themselves an excuse. So they don't do testing. So they don't need it for that. You look at organ transplants, and that is something that has been couched in abomination from the very beginning, killing, and this is yet another admission, frankly, that they take organs from live people only. And then finally the meat stuff, which is where Bill Gates has been spending his career on it. Well, we're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to talk about what is

happening to Dr. Sam Bailey in New Zealand, who blew the whistle on the COVID stuff, has now had her license taken away, $90,000 and fine, lost her license, and they're not coming after her because she's challenging them on virology. They're coming after her because she challenged them on all of the COVID, the pandemic and the measures and all the rest of the stuff. She didn't believe there was a pandemic either. And because she didn't believe that and because she challenged them, they have taken her license and they are punishing her.

We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. because she challenged them. They have taken her license and they are punishing her. We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back. Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is however not nearly so abstract as the young gentleman supposes. The issue involved here is one of monopoly. Hey! Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.

Tomorrow, it will be something else. The The home of the brave The home of the brave Liberty, it's your move. You're listening to the David Knight Show. And we are doing a fundraiser matching today. Mary Ellen Moore of freemindfilms.com has consented to match donations today. And Karen just handed me a list of Zell contributors. Julie W. Susan L., Tom and Nancy K. That is phenomenal. Thank you so much. That's beyond generous.

Thank you. Paula C. Kimberley C. and Wayne H. Thank you all. And of course, you can please don't donate on Rockfin. We're still broadcasting there. We can't get our money out of Rockfin. This has been going on for a few months, as I said earlier. So please do not donate there. If you want to know where you can donate, you can go to davidknight.news. We've shortened up, of course the old website is still there, but we shortened up the name, make it a little bit easier. And on Rumble, Real Balls City said, �Thank you very much for the tip.� And it writes,

�Christ is King.� Yes, yes. Let's talk about what happened with Dr. Sam Bailey. She and her husband have been a guest here. They're both physicians and they both questioned the lockdown. Exposanews.com has a story Dr. Sam Bailey is fined and has her medical registration canceled for exercising her right to freedom of speech and her duty to challenge the narrative. What does it mean if we are not allowed to criticize science? As I've said before, science has only advanced when the consensus is challenged. Because if everybody is following along because of the argument of authority, and again that's

what Francis Bacon said, now I've got a scientific method. We're going to take a look, if you've got a theory about something, we have to be able to reproduce it. You've got to show us your data. You've got to show us what you did, and we have to be able to reproduce it ourselves. Or we don't have science. It's got to be testable, verifiable, so forth. No, that's a, they want a system that is academic. That says, this is true because Fauci says it, or this is true because Harvard says it, or

whatever. Some, or you know, I've used the example many times, Langley, who was head of Smithsonian, most respected scientist of his time. He was like the Fauci of his time, and he was trying to make a flying machine, and he couldn't do it. And you had a couple of bicycle mechanics who were home-schooled who did it. Why? Well, because Langley had, because he trusted authority, he refused to challenge the lift tables that were there, whereas the Wright brothers did their own lift tables. Because Langley trusted authority, he was using bad lift tables and he couldn't get

off the ground. But the bicycle mechanics observed how birds operated, which is God's design. They questioned the lift tables and did their own lift tables and so they got something that worked. But that's the way science works. It works when you question the authority. It works when you show the data, that type of thing. New Zealand's Dr. Sam Bailey has been outspoken about the lack of scientific evidence behind the lockdowns, behind social distancing, behind the PCR tests and the COVID injections deployed during the COVID era. We should say error, E-R-R-O-R, except they didn't make a

mistake. They planned it. It wasn't an error on their part. It was an error on our part. For videos criticizing the response to the COVID so-called pandemic that she posted in 2020 and 2021, four and five years ago. A tribunal has recently fined her 158,000 New Zealand dollars, which is about 90,000 US, and canceled her medical registration. Whether you agree with Dr. Bailey or not, says Expose News, she has the right to air her opinions and the right, the duty even, to initiate and to engage an open scientific debate. That's the whole point.

You know we are rapidly getting deeper and deeper into a tyranny that doesn't allow questioning of anything. I've been debanked by PayPal, I've been debanked by Venmo. You know, it's a big scandal, but Mike Waltz and others in the Trump administration had their Venmo list public. Oh, they got a Venmo list? They're engaged in mass murder. They're bombing civilians, but they get to stay on Venmo. If I criticize them bombing civilians, if I criticize them mass murdering people through the pandemic, I get kicked off. That's the way this works. Though her case is not about science, but it's about

censorship and freedom of speech, which is protected under New Zealand's Bill of Rights Act of 1990. Her case exemplifies the New Zealand government's intent to silence anyone who asks medical questions or challenges their narratives. You see, science has become a religion. And they don't want a freedom of religion. To them it is a religion and that you've got a different religion and we're not going to let you talk about this. So we're not going to allow the free exercise of religion because again science is not about

proof or measurement or anything like that to these people. It's their religion, scientism. And they're going to shut down people who don't share their denomination of this stuff. In September 2020, she released a video saying that she would not take a coronavirus vaccine. As a consequence, she was fired halfway through filming a second series of the checkup. She used to work on New Zealand television. She had a New Zealand television show, The Checkup. And so she goes on television, has the courage to say, I'm not taking that. And they fired her. Over the years, she has faced significant backlash and legal challenges for public stance

against the COVID so-called vaccine, other health policies. She lost some of her employment as a medical doctor. She faced ongoing legal battles with New Zealand medical authorities. A little over a week ago, New Zealand's health practitioner disciplinary tribunal ruled that 23 YouTube videos that she posted in 2020 and 2021, mostly relating to COVID were inappropriate, inaccurate and misleading, according to them. Okay, show us your evidence.

Show us your evidence for PCR. Show us your evidence for a pandemic. Show us your evidence even for a virus, but it wasn't even about, show us the virus. It wasn't even about that. It's like you toe the line, you repeat what the official government line is, or we will take away your medical license. They said she's best known for her view

on the essence, on the existence, I should say, of viruses. A prominent advocate for the idea that viruses do not exist, and she has a very convincing, she and her husband have a very convincing book, I interviewed them on it, called The Last Pandemic. Talking about a wide variety of things throughout history. Even 45 years in the UK where they had a cold house, where they tried to figure out how the cold virus was being transmitted, even though they hadn't isolated it.

They had people who were sick with the cold and people who were not, and you volunteer for this and they pay you for a weekend or a week or however long you stay there. They were sharing mucus and other disgusting things between people to see if they could transmit this virus. Never did, so they shut this thing down after 45 years. No answers. But they would never stop and think, do I have this virus paradigm wrong? Have I created this intellectual abstraction that I can't isolate and show? And is that wrong somehow? Is there something else that's happening here? But that was not what they

came after her for. It should be noted from the outset that Dr. Bailey's stance on the non-existence of viruses was not included in the list of charges against her. Toby Young, Free Speech Union in the UK, said the enemies of free speech hunt in packs, so its defenders must band together also." That's very true. Very true. Great saying. The Medical Professional Conduct Committee submitted that positions that Bailey took in her YouTube videos were, quote, not in the realm of legitimate scientific debate. Oh, what? What is not allowed in scientific debate? Isn't anything up for debate in science? We're going to allow you to debate this, but not that.

Well, that's exactly the way the media operates, and it's the way these mandarins of science operate as well, that it had the hallmarks of conspiracy theory. No, you have the hallmarks of conspiracy theory about viruses. Your virus is a conspiracy theory if you can't prove it. If you don't isolate it, if you can't prove it, then that is a conspiracy theory, really. And so, also, deliberate efforts to undermine or discredit the official position and experts. There you go. There you go. You're telling

people the truth and that undermines what we're doing here. So we're going to have to shut you down. So the main charges were number one, Bailey was accused of questioning the accuracy and the appropriateness of PCR testing of COVID-19? You mean magnifying something by a trillion times? Something that you haven't even isolated? Something that you're looking for and making that the basis? The fact that you say that somebody is contagious when they're not even sick? You know, the older science would say, well, you've got to have a certain viral load in order to be able to pass that virus on to somebody. Well, you know, we don't even care about that anymore. And of course, they don't care about any of it. Herd immunity thing, right? Those numbers are just thrown out the door or arbitrarily changed.

All of it was up for reevaluation. It's just like a Trump tariff, you know. Number two, Bailey said that the Pfizer COVID vaccine, quote unquote vaccine, had a short development and testing timeline. She said it was not a safe product and alleged that people had been dying as a result. Absolutely true. She said this multi-country analysis is confirmed, pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified." It was just heartbreaking and beyond to hear Jack Lawson talk about his mother-in-law,

who he said, you know, she's elderly, she's English, she trusts the government completely, she took all the vaccines, and then she started having her toes on one foot turning black. And he said, we're worried that you got blood clots in, we're worried that you're going to lose, that you're going to get gangrene. So they cut off all the toes on her foot. Then the other foot started, they cut off all the toes on that foot. Then they cut off a foot and another foot and the leg and another leg and I think she's only got part

of one leg now if I remember correctly. But it's just horrific. Cut off her arm even. These clots just keep coming and their answer is to just keep amputating limbs. It's just horrific. Yeah, thrombosis. Just like when we talk about the SIDS, well, okay, that's rare, is it? No, it's not actually, it's not rare. Not at all. Number three, Bailey suggested that the COVID-19

fatality rate was much lower than suggested by official figures, and we've seen over and over again on this program. We've talked about it so many times that the number of people, it went up slightly in 2020. We now know that was hospital procedures and protocol being done by Trump and all of the globalist leaders,

all marching in lockstep using ventilators and Medazolam and denying treatment and using remdesivir and other things like that. They increased the death rate, but then it shot through the ceiling when the vaccines came out. A 2021 study entitled, Case Fatality Rate of COVID-19, a systematic review, concluded the present review results highlighted the need for transparency and testing and reporting policies and denominators used in case fatality rate estimation. It's also necessary to report the case's age, sex, and the comorbidity distribution of all patients.

This is the fight that I had with Mike Adams when I was at Infowars and he was fear-mongering, over the top, fear-mongering. So he and Alex could sell storable food, which I don't have a problem with storable food. I have a problem with the fear-mongering. And I call that into question over the case fatality rate stuff and everything. And he came back and said, well, I'm the only real scientist here and you don't understand what you're doing in terms of math. It's like, oh really?

What's your degree in? He's afraid to say what his degree is in or whether he got one or where he got it. And what he was telling people was full on lie. Disgusting. I've seen this. And that's, you know, the same type of game. Fear mongering. And number four, Bailey was critical of some figures among the medical establishment.

She said, unfortunately, scientists like Dr. Susie Wiles seems to become detached from the very nature of human health as they focus on molecular test results and top-down political policies. Wiles was a high-profile advocate of masking of vaccines and of lockdowns in New Zealand. So don't criticize your betters. Don't criticize the people who run the public health who don't care about the health of individuals or the public therefore. And number five, Dr. Bailey suggested that our body's terrain is more important than the effect of viral infection on germs when determining

potential COVID-19 outcomes. So again, we won't get into terrain theory. Maybe we'll talk about it. I'll try to get her on again. Maybe we'll talk about it when she comes on. But I want to keep this on the suppression. Let me tell you something. People who suppress evidence, people who hide facts like Michael Mann with his climate hockey stick

and all the rest of the stuff. People like that are lying to you. A Canadian detective who investigated vaccine deaths has now been found guilty, guilty for investigating deaths. This is in Ottawa. Police detective Helen Groes has been found guilty of discreditable conduct after she investigated a possible link between vaccination and sudden infant death syndrome, SIDS. SIDS is when the death of an infant less than a year old cannot be explained even after an investigation on autopsy and medical reviews. In a lot of cases we've had parents who have been charged with shaken baby syndrome, things like that, even though, you know, a baby with a large head and a small neck, if you shook the baby enough to

kill that baby, you would have broken the neck. No, it's SIDS. It's SIDS. So according to the CDC, about 3,400 babies die of SIDS each year in just the United States. Though the bewildering condition is reported as rare, it is also considered to be the leading cause of death amongst infants. So there you go. A leading cause of death, they label it rare and they're done. This is what they'll say to you when you or your family member are injured by a pharmaceutical. Oh, it's rare. So the pharmacist said to my face, about my son, yeah it's rare. It's not rare. It's not rare. They lie all the time. They kill all the time. They treat you as if you were a bodyoid, as if you were a soulless, mindless commodity for their enrichment.

That's what this is about. This is what the medical industry has become, and they're purging anybody who questions that. Anybody who shows that. Constable Grues, an officer with an exemplary record, who received letters of commendation from the public, began her investigation after noticing a sudden cluster of nine SIDS cases in 2021. She accessed the Ottawa police service database and started contacting the parents of the deceased infants to inquire about the mother's vaccination status.

She also contacted the coroner's office to determine if the mothers had been vaccinated with COVID-19 injections. Oh, so she came after the pharmaceutical industry and she came after the global genetic code injection, the GCI, the Trump shot. Her investigation was Pfizer's own post-marketing analysis conducted six months after the vaccine rollout which found that roughly 10% of vaccinated pregnancies ended in fetal or neonatal death. So they ended in a miscarriage or they ended in the baby dying shortly after birth. And again, this is something that is new.

They used to advise pregnant women to avoid vaccination. Now with this stuff, with this untested genetic code injection, they were pressuring them, pressuring them to get vaccinated. After media outlets reported that Grues was investigating vaccine deaths, she was suspended for misconduct because she had not been formally assigned to investigate them. You better have permission according to them if you want to investigate mass murderers who make billions of dollars with mass murder. Isn't that the difference?

Right? You know, Stalin who said death of one person is a tragedy, but death of a million people is a statistic? Well, I guess we could amend that to say that if somebody's making billions of dollars and the death of millions of people is just rare. Just rare. We don't have to worry about that. So doctors who gave the COVID-19 vaccine will be bankrupt by 2030, says Dr. Vernon Coleman, a medical doctor who is, he's retired now

and he does commentary in the UK. I would hope that that would be the case and of course what he's basing it on is, as we've talked about the black box notification that indemnifies the pharmaceutical company, said hey we warned you we got a black box notification. It indemnifies the FDA. They said, yeah, we made them put that black box warning on there. But then if you take the antibiotic or whatever else it is, SSRI, you name it, then they will say, well,

the doctor should have told you, or the hospital should have told you, or whatever. If it's a vaccine mandate, the corporations have liability, they would say. Except that's not the way that it's working. Not in the United States anyway. In theory, that's the way that it should work. And I understand why he's saying that. He's saying, yeah, they're going to hold the vaccine companies harmless by the doctors, the hospitals, corporations who forced you to do it? They don't have any liability for this.

So go after them. We've said that before. But here in Tennessee, we just had the Tennessee Supreme Court rule in favor of Blue Cross, Blue Shield. They fired, and it's not in their capacity as an insurer. They were being told, I guess, that Biden was not going to give them money from the federal government if they didn't get all their employees vaccinated. Same things that he pulled on hospitals and stuff like that. But it was in their capacity as an employer, not as an insurer that they got sued.

They told their employers that they had employees that they had to get the COVID shot. This one individual who did not do it was fired. And so she sued them. And now the Tennessee Supreme Court has sided with Blue Cross Blue Shield. They say that government entities are prohibited from firing employees while petitioning the government, but that restriction does not apply to private companies." Well, that's a novel interpretation, and it is wrong. It's wrong legally. It is wrong morally. And then we see NBC still pushing this stuff very heavily.

NBC is now, I guess maybe they want to, instead of National Broadcasting Corporation, maybe now they represent nuclear, biological and chemical. That's what they're focusing on all the time. It's time to worry about bird flu and cats. No, it's time to worry about NBC and the media telling you that it's time to worry about bird flu and cats. It's the ultimate transing. We have bird flu and cats and bird flu and cows

and all the rest of this nonsense now. Well we're going to take a quick break before we do. I want to thank on Rumble DG8. Thank you for the tip. He said, David I'm in the machine and tooling industry and it is slow everywhere in Ohio. So much reliance on trade with Canada and Europe is causing owners unable to make long-term decisions based on tariffs." See, that's just it. Why the chaos?

I've said and I believe that's the case, the chaos covers what they're really up to, which is the digital ID, the digital cash, other things like that they don't want you looking at. And that kind of chaos, that deliberate confrontation that he's having with people is all about that. On Rumble, Sam Miller, one, two, three. Thank you again, that is very kind, I appreciate that. Or is that still the one that we had before?

That's a new one. Wow. Thank you so much. That is very generous. Lightright Comics said, vaccines crippled my dad and killed my little brother in 1960. Same stuff. They're just better at lying. Yeah, I agree. I agree. Yeah, it was because it was killing people that they got that protection. And it's interesting to engage some of these chat programs and say, why do they have this? Oh, well, they have this immunity

because there's just so many lawsuits. I come back and I say, well, every business that is selling stuff has got the possibility of being sued and a lot of lawsuits. So why doesn't any other industry get this? Well, that's a good point that you made there, but yeah, blah, blah, blah. They don't have any explanation for it. That's just a really good point you've made there.

Well, that's obviously the truth, the glaring truth that is there. On Rumble, NeuroDivergent, thank you very much for the NeuroDivergent 1. Maybe there's a 0 or a 2 as well., thank you very much for the Neurodivergent one. Maybe there's a zero or a two as well. But thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. And again, I just mentioned quickly, I think Mary Ellen Moore of freemindfilms.com, thank you for matching funds today, said, here's a little something to keep Whistler's nephew fed. That's why I call him. Travis brought in his son and I had him there and he's just like, you know, normally he looks at me and he laughs.

A lot of people do that anymore. But he thinks that I'm humorous. Or maybe he likes me. I don't know. But I think he thinks I'm humorous. But he was just spaced out and so I'm trying to engage with him and I look over thinks I'm humorous. But he was just spaced out, and so I'm trying to engage with him, and I look over and I see Whistler behind the board, and I'm thinking I probably shouldn't use his name

even to get his attention. And so I just said Whistler's nephew. Of course, he doesn't respond to Whistler's nephew, but the audience does. So thank you. Let's welcome back Travis and congratulations. Thanks for all you do, Knights. God bless. Well, thank you very much. It's good to be back, and thank you. Yes, I appreciate that, thank you. Let's welcome back, Travis, and congratulations. Thanks for all you do, Knights. God bless.

Well, thank you very much. It's good to be back, and thank you. Yes, I appreciate that. Thank you. On Rumble, Columbo27, thank you for the tip. He says, Christ is definitely King. May the Lord bless you all and our nation. Have a great day, and thanks for all the information you share with us daily.

That's very kind. Thank you. Well, when we come back, we're going to take a quick look at what is going on with Greenland and with Panama. Things have changed in Panama as well. We'll be right back. I'm going to be a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a

little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Oh, to look around at the patch of ground, as mother nature, though it's horrible to visit.

It's a miserable place to live. That was when Charlie Kirk and Don Trump Jr. went there, but, um, yeah, it's still a miserable place. It's very, very cold. Vance couldn't believe how cold it was until he talked to the officials there. And he got an even colder shoulder. Greenland and Denmark are pushing back on his visit. As we mentioned on Friday, Usha was going to go to a dog sled race.

And they had initially, she was going to do a an appearance at a travel agency because make it a travel hotspot it's a horrible place to visit and a miserable place to live but the the tourists people backed off and says no Greenland for Greenlanders there's a lot of pressure now they hadn't recently had an election and all four parties were against Trump taking over Greenland. And so they literally went door-to-door trying to find somebody that would talk to Ushavance and nobody would. It's a small country, even though it's a giant island, only 56,000 people and now nobody wants to be ostracized by the other 59,999

people. They don't want to talk to the Vances. Greenland's new Prime Minister said on March 28th that Vance's visit signaled a lack of respect and called for political unity to combat foreign interference. He said, at a time when we as a people are under pressure we must stand together. Our message to Denmark said Vance, it's very simple. You have not done a good job by the people of Greenland. Well they don't want to be under Denmark either. They want to be independent. The US has significantly

scaled back its own Arctic defense spending over the decades, including in Greenland. This is what I said from the very beginning. I said, �You realize they've had this military base there since the end of World War II. When World War II ended, they had 10,000 people there.� I said, �Now it's come down to 400.� Why? Actually, I was wrong. It's 200.

I would say there's twice as many people as there really are. And there's no military reason for it to be there. It was there as an early warning station when they're working on radar and other state things like that, in case it was an intercontinental ballistic attack. But that is not the issue anymore. And they have satellites and other things like that. That's one of the reasons why they've taken it down from 10,000 to 200 people there. The Danish Foreign Minister Rasmussen, like the guy who does the polls, but he's not a poll, he's a Dane. Anyway, the US had maintained 17 bases and more than 10,000 service members across the

territory during the Cold War, but now only had one base with about 200 personnel. Vance has a point that we haven't done enough, but I'm a little provoked because it's also the Americans who haven't done enough." They obviously don't believe that it is a national security issue. They have not increased that military base. Now, they may do that as a threat because Trump says, well, it's possible we could do this without a military thing, but he says I'm gonna take it one way or the other. That's something of a threat, isn't it?

Vance's visit brought about some of the largest public demonstrations in Greenland's history, with protesters wearing hats or waving banners with slogans including, Yankee go home, which we've all seen, but this one, MAGA. Make America go away. Make America go away. That's the new meaning of MAGA for the rest of the world. It's a different meaning here. The rest of the world sees red as the color of communism, but not here in America.

We're red. We're red. We're red states and so forth. And the rest of the country, when we talk about MAGA, the rest of the country thinks make America go away. Well, RealClearPolitics thinks that this is a great move actually. It just about fell out of my chair when I said, JD Vance's trip to Greenland is a strong and a smart move said the commentary this is a Ned Ryan a founder and CEO of American majority Ned is that you a Trump Vance administration looks magnanimous he said

in the face of Denmark's diplomatic slights. Americans should applaud the White House's forward-looking goal of boosting US leadership in the Arctic." And then he goes to the usual excuse. We got to keep up with the Russians and the Chinese, right? We got an Arctic gap, right? We got a nuclear gap, we got an AI gap, we got a space gap, and now we got an Arctic gap. And I guess that could be part of the space gap. You can't let the Russians have the Arctic. They'll see the Big Berg. That's right. That's right. It's crazy. But this is always, they keep, it's either

the domino theory or the gap theory. These are the things that they keep using for so-called national security. He says, as Russia and China ramp up their own investments in the region, never has it been more important for America to step up and ensure our military presence in Greenland. Well, the Greenland Prime Minister says that the US will not get Greenland. He said, President Trump says the US will get Greenland. Well, let me be clear. The US will not get it.

We do not belong to anyone else. We decide our own future, newly elected Prime Minister said. He said, I think there is a good, Trump, however, said on Saturday, I think there's a good possibility that we could do it without military force, I think there's a good possibility that we could do it without military force. So it's a possibility. What he's saying is, it's possible we might use military force, is what he's saying. His mission seems to make the rest of the world absolutely despise us.

And it seems like in that he's being very successful. He says this is world peace. See, it's world peace when we invade other countries, right? When we start a war. This is international security, he says, when we start a war. And I don't take anything off the table. He is threatening them with war. What a despicable New York City Democrat, just like Hillary Clinton. They partied together. They had orgies together with Jeffrey Epstein.

They're two of a kind. Disgusting. Disgusting people. Anyway, he said, 100 percent, we get Greenland. Yeah, 100 percent, he told NBC on the interview. Good possibility we could even do it without military force, but possible we would do it. So they even put out a fear-mongering video, a propaganda piece, and I didn't put that on the board here, but it's an old Cold War thing. It goes back to the Nazi threat, and it's kind of like a why we fight type of thing. It's about two minutes long and it talks about you know the US presence there and how we want to

come back and make the world safe for democracy yada yada yada. We've all heard it before. The autonomous Danish territory is as is threatened by Russian aggression and Chinese expansion. That's what they say in there. Americans and Greenlanders have stood as sentinels at the top of the world. Pure fiction. That's why we have reduced it from 10,000 to 200. And they are the Guardians of the Galaxy. You know, that's the Space Force is what's left there in Greenland. And they call them Guardians, like Guardians of the Galaxy. And in Panama, Black Rock's Panama port deal with CK Hutchinson won't be signed next week. CK Hutchinson is a Chinese company out of Hong Kong, but they are

under pressure from the Chinese communists who have taken over Hong Kong and under pressure from the Chinese communists who have taken over Hong Kong. And they will not sign a deal next week to sell its two ports on either side of the canal to BlackRock Lead Consortium. And by the way, there's more ports than just those two. And no word about what was going on with the other ones. They said there's obvious reasons, they said. Well, the obvious reasons include an infuriated Chinese Communist Party that sees this company as having bent the knee to Trump

and the Americans. This is now about influence and you're going to do what I tell you to do and not what these other people tell you to do. The bill was going the deal rather was going to be $19 billion and would be 43 ports in 23 countries, two of them in Panama. But on Friday, the South China Morning Post, which is a mouthpiece for the Chinese government, revealed that CK Hutchinson Holdings will not go ahead with the expected signing of a deal next week to sell its two strategic ports to Panama, with Beijing saying that it will launch an antitust probe into the sale.

Now it's kind of interesting when we look at the Panama Canal, again, it is operated by Panamanians. There are some ports that are privately owned by people in different countries and other parts of it, but it's run by the Panamanian government. And the Panamanian government though, because of the pressure from the Trump administration, started an income tax auditing procedure against some of these companies, against CK holding, to pressure them into being amenable to selling it.

So the US pressures Panama. Panama uses an audit threat, or reality, to pressure them to sell it. Meanwhile, the Chinese are going to use an antitrust probe into them in order to pressure them to not sell it. These kinds of indirect actions are the kinds of things that we see governments doing all the time. Well, we're going to take a quick break and when we come back, we're going to take a look at what is happening with some various news issues.

We've got some news about what is happening with a very famous rock band that I want to cover when we come back. Stay with us. We'll be right back. Here's a little song I wrote. You might want to hear it in your pot. You know nothing and be happy ain't got no cash ain't got no car but 24 booster shots in your arm owe nothing be happy happy. Be happy and eat the bugs. They're doing what in the place they named after me? Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.

Making sense. Common again. This is The David Knight Show. B. Turner, 170, thank you very much. She says, thank you, David. And again, we have matching funds, Mary Ellen Moore of freemindfilms.com as matching funds today.

So we really appreciate her doing it. And so including funds that are checks that are dated today. So we really do appreciate that. We were down quite a bit this month. But I saw this headline about the Who's Roger Daltrey. He said he's going deaf and blind, and of course the first thing came to my mind was he still plays a mean pinball. But he actually is, he is actually joking about it as well. I would not have said that if he had not jumped into these jokes as well. He said, the joys of getting old mean that you go deaf and so now I have the joy of also going blind.

Fortunately I still have my voice because if not I would do a full Tommy, the deaf dumb and blind kid but he does play mean pinball Pete Townsend who was also there at the concert Roger Daltrey is 81 Pete Townsend is 79 he joked that he was Superman now said Pete Townsend after he got his knee replaced and told the audience maybe I should auction off the old one Elton John had a knee done and he wears his as a bracelet. That's kind of creepy He says unfortunately mine is in three bits However, he added that compared to what those who need the Teenage Cancer Trust that was a benefit concert

They were doing he says compared to what they're going through. He says dealing with this is nothing. And of course the band has been a patron of the Teenage Cancer Trust. They said since 2000 they have been performing concerts that have raised 32 million pounds to help bankroll 28 specialist units and the NHS care workers and specialist nurses. And I'm sure now that it has gotten much worse with the vaccines. He said, so as we get old, he said life slows down because it's so much harder getting up and down the stairs. Uh, but he says it also speeds up. That's an interesting perspective.

And it is true. Uh, NBC says that they have a film that proves that Oswald could not have been the shooter. And this is coming from Anna Polina Luna, who is running the committee that is looking at the JFK release of information. The Republican Congresswoman who is leading a task force on the declassification of JFK and other assassination files made a sensational claim Friday evening said that NBC News possesses film evidence proving that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have shot Kennedy. Now she is working to obtain it.

She said this in an interview with Jesse Waters on Fox News. She told Waters the task force will be holding an April the first hearing. What an appropriate date. April fool's day. People think they're going to get to the bottom of JFK stuff. After all these years. She said, it was made aware to me this evening that NBC, yeah, NBC, they're featuring prominently in the news themselves, aren't they?

Anyway, they, they know all about bird flu and they know that Lee Harvey Oswald was not involved in the shooting. Anyway, NBC actually has a video that's never been seen before. We're actually going to be sending a letter requesting that from NBC because it allegedly shows Oswald near the vehicle when the assassination took place, which means that he couldn't have been the shooter. And of course, there's many, many pieces of evidence that show that he could not have been the shooter.

Just go to that bank depository thing and look out the window. One piece that was done by a guy who was a trained sniper, and he went into great detail about how that would not have worked. And so anyway, Luna said that Oliver Stone, who directed the 1991 thriller JFK, said that he has seen a secondary copy of the film and that NBC has been sitting on it. She said, director Stone actually told me that he has shown this tape, that it was a secondary copy. He said that this could blow up the entire JFK investigation. What I will also tell you, Jesse, is he said that NBC has been very, very much so guarding this tape,

so I believe that that tape belongs to the American people. We're going to be sending a letter asking for that tape, and I would encourage everyone to ask NBC to release that tape to the public. Well, besides the fact that NBC is mockingbird media, do you for a minute believe that if they had a tape that exonerated Lee Harvey Oswald that it would still be in existence? They would have burned that before reading, you know, that or they would have been threatened by the CIA or the powers of B. Again, this is, I don't believe any of this stuff is going to show us anything. Egg prices have taken a sharp plunge as Americans watch the costs trend downward. So what is it? Is it the eggopoly that is, are they kind of giving it a rest? You know, there was talk about how the attorney

general might be looking at their collusion because they have done it in the past. They have been found guilty of doing it. There was a lawsuit from General Mills and other food companies saying, you're gouging us on price. Three or four large egg companies are fixing the price and they had to pay tens of millions of dollars to them because they were fixing the price. So is the egg monopoly worried about this? Are they going to ease up for a while? I don't think that's the case. As a matter of fact, we can look at the read between the lines here and that is not the case. Uh, is USA. Yeah.

This egg issue won't be over easy. Well, there's always a sunny side to any of these stories, I guess. The USA is still doing the mass killing out there, I think. So the price of eggs has taken a sharp plunge as Americans have watched the cost of grocery, this grocery staple go way up and inventories are recovering, they said, amid a sudden and largely unexplained slowdown in bird flu cases. So is the USDA backing off? Inventories are recovering? I think that's the key. The USDA might back off of the mass slaughters. Yeah we just don't have as many bird flu cases anymore. You know they would go in with a PCR test, magnify this stuff to an absurd amount,

whatever it was that they were looking for. We've got one, you know, this is the USDA equivalent of Ghostbusters. We've got one and we're ready to believe you. We're ready to believe our PCR tests as well and we'll kill all the birds on your farm because we've got one bird here where the bird is sick that has blown the PCR procedure. But I think the fact that inventories are recovering tells you that these are eggs that were bought in by the Trump administration. They said they were going to be importing eggs and they are importing eggs. And so this temporary drop in prices

that you're seeing there are them bringing in, I guess we could say the strategic egg reserve that is from outside the country, just like they would do the strategic petroleum reserve to try to mitigate some temporary shortage, because there's no way that by just stopping the mass slaughter of chickens that the egg inventory would immediately respond. It has to be responding by stuff they're bringing in, in my opinion.

Tommy Tuberville, senator from Alabama said, oh, Brooke Rollins, I'm a big fan of hers. Yeah, right. We're getting ready to import hundreds and hundreds of thousands of eggs, he said, and you know, that's fine. But it needs to be a short period of time because we have to protect our farmers here, right? So, what's all this stuff about tariffs? When we're not even allowed to produce our own eggs here because we've got the USDA breathing down our necks and breathing down the necks of the chickens and killing them by the tens of millions every month. Now what a joke! We're gonna be self-sufficient

when the government keeps us from even being able to produce eggs and it is the American government. This isn't happening any other nation on earth. We have migratory birds. They're supposed to be the heart of this epidemic and yet the countries, other countries that they're flying through, they're not getting sick and dying. The birds aren't dropping out of the sky. The birds aren't dying in other countries

on other egg farms. Nothing other. It's all our government. It is all an out of control bureaucracy, an out of control USDA, and it is all crony capitalism working with these big egg companies. We've been bringing in eggs from Turkey and South Korea, and we got another couple of

countries that we talked to yesterday to try to get the supplies back up," said Brooke Rollins. That's what is happening here. This is an artificial stimulus here. Astro-Turf, if you will. So, looking at Signalgate, supposedly, according to Politico, and RT carried the story as well, supposedly Vance asked Trump to fire Waltz. J.D. Vance and other senior officials suggested that Trump fire National Security Advisor Mike Waltz during JD Vance and other senior officials suggested that Trump fire National Security Advisor Mike Waltz during a private discussion about an incident, which he had accidentally included

a reporter. But here's the story here that is not covered by RT or by Politico. That is covered actually by Paul Sperry. And thank you to Harry Hound who gave me the tip on Twitter. Paul Sperry went back and he called out Waltz, said he's a liar. He says if you go back and you look at the events that they've had recently in the last couple of years, Waltz and Goldberg pictured together, standing together, he was a featured guest, Waltz was, at the Atlantic. Goldberg, the guy who doesn't know how he got on the list, was the moderator there.

And now we have seen that Goldberg is actually on Walth's phone list. And not only that, but Paul Sperry said Jessica Tarlov, a Trump critic and Democrat who comments on Fox News, was also on his Venmo list. Is he paying her? What's the deal with this? But they all know that's the situation. And so Trump, according to these people who have spoken with Politico, say that Vance, Suzy Wiles, personnel chief Sergio Gore, all advise Trump that it might be time to cut Waltz loose, but Trump says, no, I'm not going to give the pearl-clitching Democrats a win. We are not going to give them a scalp. So regardless of what happens, he's going to keep them around. All this sanctimonious nonsense about national security doesn't matter to them.

That's all it is. It really is. He says, I don't fire people because of fake news and because of witch hunts. Well, fake, these news organizations that are opposed to him is what he is not going to do it. And he looks at personal loyalty that matters more to him than anything else. All the stuff they talk about, national security. Vance has now publicly aligned himself and they did the Greenland trip together. And so they're presenting a unified face.

But Politico says that Walt's position is tenuous, citing one Trump ally who said they'll stick by him for now, but he'll be gone in a couple weeks. And look, I think that information liberation got it right when he said that Walt is channeling information to Goldberg, who's giving it to Israel. That's why he's on his list there. Leaking stuff to him. Because that's what really matters to these people. Meanwhile, we talk about eggs. Well, they're going to – we've got a lawyer in Texas saying that in Texas, you might lose your license for

drinking too much coffee. So, not just the eggs, but also the coffee. If you get behind the wheel, how high is the limit? This is what happens when rights become privileges, isn't it? Sorry, we're going to have to pull you over and do a blood test here. Maybe do a PCR test. Do a PCR test to see how much caffeine you've got. I think the sovereign citizens are right when they say, we have a God-given right to travel. If I'm not operating a business here, I'm not quote-unquote driving. Don't expect that you're going to get an honest hearing, though.

That's simply not going to happen in court. So that, to me, even though legally they're correct, it's a non-starter because the courts are not going to entertain. I've seen that happen with people who are tax protesters. I knew a guy who went to prison, he talked to him personally about it. And he said, yeah, I had this all laid out and I get up there to start making my case.

And the judge says, we're not talking about that. Next, no, we're not talking about that either. It's off the limits. I've seen them use this in the Bundy situation where you got people who are ducking because the BLM, they were threatening to shoot us. You got people that are ducking behind concrete.

And the Bundy's lawyers said, why are people ducking down? What are they worried about? We're not gonna talk about that. Because we're not gonna talk about the fact that they were threatening to shoot people. So they'll take all that stuff off. Meanwhile, he says, DWI in Texas isn't just about alcohol.

It can be anything, including caffeine. You can be driving under the influence. It might make you jittery. Maybe if they pull you over and you kinda walk the line, maybe you walk the line too quickly. That's an infraction. Who knows? But look, it's all about making it illegal to drive.

And we can see this happening in Hawaii and Honolulu. They've now started with speed enforcement by cameras. People have their vehicle and their speed data collected thanks to 15 cameras around the city. They've put some of them in areas that have speed limits as low as 25, so the machine can write you up and make money for them. Meanwhile, we have parents who are arrested in the UK for complaining about the school on WhatsApp.

Very interesting to see how this is portrayed in the media. They said the parents were arrested in January for allegedly harassing their daughter's primary school with WhatsApp messages. The police showed up. The couple of the parents were detained for eight hours, subjected to searches and to fingerprinting, but no charges were filed. Why? Well, because they hadn't violated any laws, I'm sure.

So the father questioned the school's headmaster's appointment process, leading to a ban from school grounds and from events. And so they were upset about that. They complained about it on WhatsApp. So the police, the Hartfordshire police, confirmed that the rest were made based on harassment and malicious communication allegations, but they said there was insufficient evidence for further action." So in other words, it turns out that the harassment and the malicious allegations were coming from the school.

The malicious allegations were coming from the school. The harassment was coming from the police, asced by the fact they arrested these people, kept him for eight hours and then let him go. That's what we're seeing over and over again. You got hurt feelings? Call the police. Call the police. They are ready to believe you. And they're gonna find anything they can to shut this down. Well, thank you for joining us and thank you so much to all of you for helping us on this last day of the month. Thank you especially to Mary Ellen Moore of freemindfilms.com for matching this.

Thank you all of you. Have a good day. Good evening. Tonight's tale is a story of paranoia and a most unexpected perpetrator, the common cow. Or more specifically, what comes out the other end. Yes, the air is thick with intrigue, as it seems that in our modern age of propaganda, even a humble bovine's backside can be branded a national security threat. The menace is invisible, silent, yet deadly.

Carefully contrive to panic the masses into accepting the government stepping in, jackboots and all, with their solutions. Because who better to stop a gaseous threat than a bunch of political windbags? But one must wonder, is this truly about saving the planet, or are we simply being led to pasture? Is it merely a MacGuffin? The David Knight show serves as a breath of fresh air for those who still believe that truth can stand up to scrutiny. And he's found that the government narrative smells suspiciously like a load of bull. So if you want to help others catch wind of the BS being shoveled out of Washington, please

consider supporting the show. And now back to our regularly scheduled program. You're listening to the David Knight Show.