The David Knight Show - Mon Episode #2276: — CIA Stargate, Trump Slush Fund, and the Occult Tech State

Episode Date: June 2, 2026

──────────────────────────────────────── [00:02:30] Two Courts Block Trump's $1.776 Billion Slush Fund — 35 Retired Federal Judges Say It's Collusion and a Fraud on the Court The statute of limitations had expired; Trump never submitted a settlement; DOJ never defended any IRS claims — 35 judges say no genuine adversarial controversy existed. ──────────────────────────────────────── [00:18:00] Todd Blanche Added a Secret Paragraph Giving the Trump Family Immunity From IRS Claims — Saving Them $100 Million or More The addendum bars the US from asserting claims against the Trump family — added by the attorney general who also works for the man he gave immunity to. ──────────────────────────────────────── [00:31:00] Georgia Tech Aerospace Professor: Interstellar Travel Is Physically Impossible — the Engineering Requirements Contradict Each Other At 10% of light speed, hydrogen atoms hit like .22-caliber bullets; fusion fuel must be 150 times the ship's mass; adding shielding makes the weight equation unsolvable. ──────────────────────────────────────── [00:42:00] The CIA Named Their Remote Viewing Program 'Stargate' — the Same Name Trump Used for His mRNA and AI Initiative on Day One Reason documents the Soviet/CIA paranormal arms race from 1924 Bolshevik seances through the Stanford parapsychology project — all classified, all occultic. ──────────────────────────────────────── [00:55:00] Oregon Initiative Would Ban All Hunting, Fishing, and Livestock Slaughter — Animal Breeding Redefined as Sexual Assault The measure has 120,000 signatures, more than the required 117,000; farmers would be offered job retraining while Oregon imports all meat from other states. ──────────────────────────────────────── [01:08:00] Washington State Plans Speed-Limiting Devices on Cars — 10 Miles Over the Limit in a 40 mph Zone Qualifies as Dangerous Knight: drunk semi-truck drivers can buy their way off the safety database through fake rehab programs while drivers who go 10 mph over get their car electronically throttled. ──────────────────────────────────────── [01:18:00] A Waymo Ran From the Police at Terrifying Speed Through a Construction Zone — Passengers Said 'We're Going to Die' The car veered off the highway and accelerated with sirens behind it; an operator in India came on the line and offered the traumatized couple $40 in free future rides. ──────────────────────────────────────── [01:28:00] Section 224 of the NDAA Would Merge US and Israeli Military Data, AI, Cyber, Autonomous Systems, and Biotech Responsible Statecraft: the provision creates deeper integration with Israel than the US has with any NATO partner, moving arms transfers into classified channels beyond public oversight. ──────────────────────────────────────── [01:38:00] Jonathan Pollard on Camera: Israel Parked a Nuclear-Armed Plane at Tel Nof and Told the US to Look — the Airlift Started the Next Day Pollard: Israel allegedly threatened nuclear weapons in 1973 to force the arms airlift; the OPEC embargo against only the US followed as payback. ──────────────────────────────────────── [01:52:00] 35 States Require Certifying You Don't Support a Boycott of Israel to Get a Government Contract or Hurricane Relief Glenn Greenwald: 35–36 states have enacted anti-boycott laws; hurricane disaster aid was conditioned on signing one; HHS research grants under RFK Jr. carried the same requirement. ──────────────────────────────────────── Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code “KNIGHT” For high quality made in America products go to HomeSteadProducts.shop and use promo code “Knight” for 10% off your purchases Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 2nd of June, your of our Lord, 2006. Well, Trump's corruption in this slush fund thing is even bigger than we saw before. We got two courts that have pushed back against him, and 35 retired judges are pushing this as well, pointing out the lies. So we're going to go over that, but we're also going to take a look at the extraterrestrial disclosure garbage, as Steven Spielberg is getting ready to push his spiel. E.T. if it's real, how could it ever get here? And even more importantly, we're going to take a look at the Luciferian intelligence agencies, both U.S. and Russia, the occultic practices

of these corrupt organizations. And Prohibition is ramping up everywhere. You can imagine. and many things and places that you can never imagine. We'll talk about all the efforts around this country to prohibit anything and everything. You won't believe how bad it has gotten. And then there is a quiet move to join the U.S. military to the Israeli military,

to merge them together, so they can move more money, deception, secretly. Folks, this is worse than any conspiracy theory. We're going to talk about what is behind this. They're going to stick it in the NDAA. Well, let's begin with the slush fund. The swamp is not being drained. There's more slush in it than ever before. So Trump was meeting yesterday with Mike Johnson to talk about how this is completely derailing the GOP. How many more things can Trump do?

And I guess perhaps there is a limit how much they can manipulate the elections with the gerrymandering and things like that because he already has most of America against him on this Iran war. Now he's engaged in the most open corruption we have ever seen. I've ever seen in my lifetime. And so the two of them are getting together to talk about this because this is frozen their desire to get more funding from ice and border patrol. It is basically freezing everything and it's going to freeze them out of the leadership in Congress as well. Well, the fund has been temporarily blocked by federal judge from awarding payouts, and another one is actually investigating, after 35 judges have pushed for this,

actually investigating the inherent corruption in all of this, and the corruption in what acting attorney general Todd Blanche has done. Acting is the appropriate word, I think, here. Anyway, Trump has continued to support it, the Sush Fund, creating a headache for GOP lawmakers, trying to get a reconciliation bill passed and also trying to get re-elected. Johnson and Trump met yesterday morning on the weaponization fund. It has completely screwed up passing reconciliation, ICE funding, and other issues for the GOP voters. But Reason had an excellent article about how.

corrupt this settlement is, it's not just one, but it's two judicial roadblocks. Two judges in two very different areas. One of them, the Eastern District of Virginia, the judge temporarily barred the Justice Department from allocating many money to this nearly $2 billion fund. The other one is in Southern District of Florida, Judge Williams there, closed Trump's case on May 18th after he dropped his lawsuit. But she ordered a briefing on the question of whether or not the settlement was, quote, a product of collusion and a fraud on the court. Well, absolutely it was. As a matter of fact, 35 former federal judges that have been appointed to positions by presidents of both major parties filed a motion with her.

They urged her to reopen the Trump versus the IRS because the purported settlement, they said, which was never submitted to her for review, raises profound questions about the party's candor towards the court and manipulation of the judicial system. And this is what Trump is boasting about. He says, hey, you know, I can, I'm basically suing myself and I can just award this money to myself. It's a crazy thing. It's like, yeah, it really is, especially when you're so stupid you would even say that out

loud. Williams thought these questions were worth exploring. She said, a court is empowered to investigate serious misconduct as a collateral issue within the purview of Rule 11 and to determine whether or not an attorney has abused the judicial process. Rule 11 aims to deter baseless filings. Authority, it authorizes sanctions against attorneys who file claims that are legally frivolous and unsupported by evidence or driven by an improper purpose. I think maybe the attorney general needs to be disbarred. That's the situation we have here in America right now. Under that rule, attorneys who submit complaints, briefs, or motions are required to certify that the filing is not presented for any improper purpose. A party's decision to file a frivolous lawsuit for the sole purpose

of forcing a settlement may qualify as such an improper purpose, said the judge. The judge. judge. Even worse, it is, this is just a pretext for awarding himself cash. You talk about fraud. There's fraud on steroids. They point to the fact that the settlement in question includes a three-paragraph addendum that purports to bar the United States from pursuing claims that could have been otherwise asserted against the Trump family. That's the statement that was added later on by so-called attorney general, Todd Blanche, to say that they have immunity to any issues that the IRS might have with a Trump family, which basically gets them off the hook for about $100 million worth of payments and fines and things like that. So it highlights the fact that the defendants not even

try to defend against plaintiff's claims despite their active opposition to nearly identical claims and other litigation. So what they're saying is, the Department of Justice, this actively opposes claims like this in other litigation, but they didn't defend against this. Because essentially his boss was also the plaintiff. The former judges also assert that plaintiff's claims are clearly untimely, therefore untenable. As a matter of fact, under federal law, we had not talked about this before. Plaintiffs have to file such claims within two years of learning about unauthorized disclosure of their tax information. Trump clearly missed that deadline.

And I guess the Attorney General clearly missed the fact that he missed the deadline too, right? Because it has been more than two years since the guy who leaked the information was found, not found guilty, but he pleaded guilty. And so they knew about it before he pleaded guilty. But he pleaded guilty more than two years ago. So they missed the deadline. Trump's lawsuit, averred that the IRS contractor had inflicted at least $10 billion in damages. Where does that number come from?

That was the other thing, right? And I've pointed out so many times he files a $10 billion lawsuit against all these different media organizations, the Wall Street Journal, the BBC, many others, and then he settles for other. It's just a number that he throws out there. It has absolutely no basis. It is totally frivolous. the basis of his lawsuits are frivolous, the amount that he is suing for is frivolous. They said the complaint did not make any attempt to back up that $10 billion in damages number,

which by some strange coincidence is exactly the same as Trump's estimate of damages and several other lawsuits involving distinctly different claims. He just sues everybody for $10 billion. It's just so obvious. what a fraud and a liar he is. They also argued that the IRS should not be held responsible for the conduct of someone who was employed by a private contractor. This guy who did it was working for the consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton at the time.

The government's lawyers did not try any of the defenses suggested by the IRS. In fact, they never even officially responded to Trump's claims at all. In other words, they didn't respond to the lawsuit. They didn't try to defend anything. the IRS was saying, well, here's how we would defend against this. The Department of Justice did none of that. A failure that highlights the egregious conflicts of interest created by this lawsuit. I'm supposed to work out a settlement with myself.

Trump acknowledged a few days before he sued the IRS. And he has already awarded himself money and damages and other issues as well. That bizarre situation prompted Judge Williams to question whether the case involved a genuine controversy between adverse parties, as is required for a lawsuit to proceed. And that's something several judges, including Judge Napolitano pointed out. He said, first of all, in a lawsuit, you have to have an adversarial situation. You can't be both plaintiff and defendant. That is total nonsense, like everything else in the Trump administration.

In addition to an apology from the IRS, Trump got $1.8 billion for a purported victim. of lawfare and weaponization. And again, don't get caught up with this head fake. Bringing in the J6 people, as I said, was simply to try to appeal to his base, who he knew we're going to see that this is fraud. Everybody was going to say that it was fraud. But he could pull them in with this tribal stuff, right?

And yet the reality is that this is really about him. It's not about the J6 people. and both his enemies and his friends are doing us all a disservice by pointing out that. As a matter of fact, one of the things they said is that settlements like this are prohibited by another rule. In other words, you can't, if there's an action, a lawsuit or something like that, you cannot award money to somebody that is not involved in that at all. And as I said from the very beginning, this is all about Trump personally and his, IRS disputes.

It's highly unusual for the Justice Department to settle a lawsuit by agreeing to pay people whose grievances are completely unrelated to the plaintiff's claims. Such settlements, in fact, are prohibited by a rule that the Justice Department issued during Trump's first term. That rule, which Pam Bondi, then the Attorney General, reaffirmed in February of 2025, and it bars settlement payments to a, quote, non-governmental person. or entity that is not a party to the dispute. That's exactly what's going on with the J6 people.

In case the payoff to Trump's allies were not corrupt enough, Todd Blanche revealed on May 19th, he put in his extra addition there, protecting them from any disputes of the IRS, saving the Trump crime family, $100 million or more. When Trump dropped his case, neither his personal attorneys for the Justice Department's lawyers who also work for him. Neither of these people who work for him informed the judge that they had dropped the case.

So she said, there was no settlement of record. They never sent me a thing saying, yeah, we settle this, and here's what we did. The Justice Department neither submitted any settlement documents nor filed any documents ensuring that the settlement was appropriate, where there was an outstanding, question as to whether an actual case or controversy existed. Here's the bottom line, folks. Trump is not careful with the details. He doesn't care.

He feels like he can do anything he wants. He has become so arrogant, so filled with hubris. He doesn't even bother to try to lie to us. He doesn't even bother to try to wargame this out and come up some kind of a plausible explanation. He just does whatever he wants. That is going to be his downfall. Williams was deceived.

the former federal judges said in their motion, 35 of them, by the way. Neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants said anything about a settlement in court. The Justice Department publicly announced a settlement of this action shortly after the plaintiffs filed their dismissal. There was never an adversarial proceeding over which the court even had jurisdiction,

says the motion, from 35 former federal judges, appointed by both Republican and Democrat administrations. This is truly amazing. And yet we've got even more Republicans moving back against this. You've got Lindsey Graham even saying, hey, you need to get rid of this. This is a hot potato that's going to really bounce back against you. And we have a very conservative Republican.

Her name is Kat Kamek. I don't know anything about her. that I've seen people say she's very, very conservative. Her husband is a first responder. He is someone who is a medic for a SWAT team. And she is highly offended by the idea that some J6 people could get money out of this. Well, as someone who served on the weaponization committee last Congress, I can tell you that the issue is very real and it is rampant.

but I'm not sure that a billion-dollar-plus slush fund is the answer. I think if you really want to eliminate the weaponization that takes place within the federal government against American citizens and those that serve, you need to actually address the root cause. This is the problem that we have in Washington. It's the idea of throwing money at a problem and hoping it goes away. I think that money could be better spent in bringing down the cost of everything and making life more affordable for Americans while simultaneously addressing the system that allowed for the

weaponization against individuals here in this country. And certainly, I will say, as the wife of a first responder, absolutely under no circumstances, would I ever support any payouts for anyone who ever assaulted law enforcement? Right. Well, somebody said, well, if you lose her, she's one of the more conservative members. You've lost pretty much the GOP. As a matter of fact, Lindsay Graham, even, as I said he's urging Trump to stop this before it's too late. She said, you need to actually address the root causes. And I said this before Trump took office after he got elected.

I said, yeah, this weaponization stuff that Biden did is really bad. Rather than saying, well, Biden did it. So I can do it. I can take it to the next level, which is what they both do. We just up the ante each time. And it is creating a downward spiral as we all go down the drain. Every time you hear these people on the Republican side, whenever Trump does anything criminal, they say, well, Biden did it.

Well, Biden did it. So that gives us an excuse. That's not how it works. We have a constitution. We have a rule of law. And these are things that need to be bolstered, need to be enforced, need to be strengthened if necessary to stop this. That's called reform. They don't want any reform.

Trump wants personal power. He wants personal political power, and he wants. money and that's what this is ultimately about. He is not going to reform anything. If he leaves it corrupt the way that it is and if he grabs the corruption that Biden put in and adds to it to make himself more powerful, what that does is that is Trump making himself personally more powerful, personally more feared rather than making the government better. He's making the government worse in to do that. And so then you have Mike Pence who goes on and he talks about this slush fund on Sunday and boy, Maga comes out against Pence. They really hate him. Pince said he's deeply offended

that some of this money could be going to people who had attacked the police. And again, both Trump's friends and enemies, both the people who, you know, are either side of this. They all understand the corruption involved in it. And they're all going back to the J6 situation. You heard even Kat Kamik say that. Her husband, a medic for a SWAT team, as well as a firefighter. So she said, I can't support that. Well, they didn't come after her, but they came after Pence for that.

And this outlet here, which is the independent sentinel, said, you can have logical disagreement about the slush fund. Logical disagreement? How about the fact that it is an illegal fraud upon the court and the American people? Could we say that? Could we agree that that's what it is? Because that's clearly the case. He's violated every aspect of lawsuits, of court procedures, of Rule 11, of statute, of limitations.

Everything has just been thrown out. And what we have are fiatts and dictates from his little minions, like Todd Blanche. Could we say that about it? No, you don't say that. But he said Pence said that the fund was to provide compensation for people who attack the police. Well, he's just lying. And, you know, quite frankly, that is not the truth. The truth is, this is really going to the Trump crime family.

And we're going to actually switch topics here. I'm going to take a break. I want to get into this disclosure stuff. This is something that has been annoying me. As I see, Spielberg is putting more of his occultic nonsense out there. and really it is filled with occult symbols of many people have pointed out in his trailer. And this is really what the stuff really is. And he's hitting the ground running with his movie called Disclosure as Trump and also Democrats.

We're also pushing all this stuff at the same time. Here's an article that's done by a guy who is a, he's an engineering professor. and he's involved in rocket science. And so he says, you know, what would it actually take for aliens to reach the Earth? And so he actually did the math. And he talked about it as a feasibility study. And it's not the first time this has been done. I've seen other people do this in the past.

As I said before, you've got a lot of secular scientists and engineers who look at this and say, well, this kind of interstellar. or travel just is not possible. And it's not practical. Why would somebody do something like this? And so he goes through and he talks about what it actually take to get here. This is why a lot of them say, well, I don't think it is interstellar. It might be something that is multidimensional, but it's not interstellar.

And so what he's pointing out, he says the closest, very closest star would be four and a quarter light years away. And he said, and I don't know how he gets this. he said, even if you had a cruising speed at 10% of light. And I don't know how he went from what I would think would be 40 years of travel. If you're going at 10% of speed of light, somehow with his math. And Lance and I talked about this last night. So maybe there's just a very long acceleration and deceleration period of time.

Because you're getting up to still an incredible speed when you're doing that, even at 10% of speed of light. But he says, you're talking about something. something be a century or so to travel, especially if you're talking about not just the closest star, but go to another star with that. He said, no single law of physics rules out interstellar travel outright, but the compounding weight of hundreds of extreme, often conflicting engineering requirements, the kind of shielding you would need, the kind of fuel load that you would need, the structural integrity may make a crude voyage, and that's not C-R-U-D-E, but it's a voyage

with a crew on board, to Earth would be physically impossible, regardless of how advanced the civilization becomes. And notice that when these people are putting this out, you've got the little green men and the, you know, the big heads and the big eyes and all the rest of this stuff. We're talking about a physical entity that they're trying to sell you, selling you an ET or something like that. And he says that simply isn't going to happen. You have to go through an acceleration phase.

And even after you're going at 10% the speed of low, light. He points out that space is not completely empty. You're going to run into some particles. And when you hit those particles, it's going to be like hitting bullets. And it's going to go straight through a, it's going to go straight through a spacecraft unless you've got tremendous amount of shielding and armor on that thing, which is going to increase the weight. So as one of my engineering professors said, you know, you can't, you can't break even. You know, It's the law of thermodynamics. It's always something else coming in here.

And so the congressional hearing marked the beginning of a cultural shift to which UFO reports are increasingly treated as a matter for serious discussion. However, this newfound legitimacy, is it really deserved? Asked the professor. As an aerospace scientist who studies aircraft and space design, I approach this question using math, physics, and the principles of engineering. To assess the plausibility of alien visitors, it's necessary to understand the obstacles that extraterrestrial vessel would need to overcome to reach Earth.

So the first one is the tyranny of distance, which basically turns into time, time involved. Why would they make such a long journey? And so he goes through some analogies here. Like if Earth was the size of pee, the distance would be blah, blah, blah. I'm not going to do that. That's kind of thing. You know, if your intestines are so long that if you straighten them out, you know, you could eat in New Jersey. and poop in New York or something like that.

And so I've never found those analogies to be very useful. But anyway, so you have to have a lot of speed. But even with that speed, you have an issue of time. And then that speed itself creates other secondary and tertiary issues. How do you get to that speed? What kind of fuel do you need? He said, no object can reach or exceed the speed of light. but well before approaching that threshold,

engineering constraints began to assert themselves. Limited fuel availability, the potential for structural damage, will restrict the spacecraft's peak velocity. There is no universally accepted upper limit on interstellar flight speeds, but studies tend to converge around 19,000 miles per second, which is 10% of the speed of light. As a realistic cruise velocity at this speed, a journey of 10 light years will take approximately 100 years to complete.

Finding a way to accelerate the ship to target cruise speed is the central challenge facing any would-be alien explorers. The lack of atmosphere means that you're not going to have any drag, so you're going to spend all your fuel accelerating, and then you can just coast, right? However, you're going to need to have course corrections, and you're going to have to expend the same amount of fuel in order to stop because there also is no drag. There's nothing to break you except for your propulsion system. So you're going to use it at the beginning and the end of the trip. So he talks about different ways of rocket propulsion, whether you can use

chemical propulsion, even things like anti-matter propulsion theoretically, nuclear fission, all this. He goes through all these different things and says, still, if you had even fusion-powered ship to get to a cruise velocity of 19,000 miles per second, it'd require fuel equivalent of 150 times the mass of the ship itself, even with fusion. This is why even the fuel requirements are, I guess we could say, astronomical. He says, understellar space contains a lot of space matter, smatterings of hydrogen atoms and other things like that, which typically it would be negligible, but at 19,000 miles per second, they would smash into a ship's hole with the energy of a 22 caliber bullet. And so you've got to armor the thing. Now your mass is even

higher, which rise up even more of the demand for fuel. And so he said when design requirements are in tension with one another, for example, requiring a structure that's lightweight but supremely durable, the number of feasible solutions can drop to zero. And that's what he's saying. It says no way. It's a very long way of saying there's absolutely no way. And here's the basic reasons why. No single law of physics prohibits interstellar of wage, but the combined effects of hundreds of extreme,

often conflicting engineering requirements, render it physically impossible. The question would go further in terms of shedding light on the deeper mysteries of the universe is, how on earth did they get here? And so anyway, he's a professor of aerospace engineering, at Georgia Tech. And a very interesting article.

And as part of this, I also picked up an article. This one was done by Reason Magazine, which does not get into the occultic woo-woo stuff, except in a historical standpoint. And this is something that has been really heavily involved with the Bolsheviks and with the CIA. groups that I have always considered to be highly satanic. And so I thought it was worth covering this as well,

especially because I think it is all rooted in this disclosure deception that is there as well. Just understand the same people who are pushing all this stuff about disclosure have been involved in remote viewing and seances and mind reading and all this other kind of stuff, thinking that they're getting something for real. This is the CIA as well as the Soviet. Psychic soldiers. mind readers, dolphin drones, the Cold War's weird paranormal history. Now, Soviet seances and CIA remote viewers sparked decades-long arms race that no one was supposed

to know about. They get into these paranoid competitions with each other. You know, just like artificial intelligence is the most recent one over all kinds of things. But I think really this is a tale of our Luciferian overlords who are involved in all kinds of paranormal supernatural things. And so going back to an issue in 2019, the Russian Ministry of Defense's official magazine had an article titled Super Soldiers for the War of the Future. And they went back and talked a lot about the history of this.

The psychic experiments began back in 1924, a couple of people that were, of course, involved with the Bolsheviks, that revolution that happened in 1917. And they traced this actually to before the Bolsheviks even got involved. If you go back and you look, many people know about Rasputin, of course, and his influence on the Romanov family that was the czars at the time. But a lot of this stuff was brought in by some people way before that that started getting involved in the occult. one guy named Barchinko.

He hosted wild orgies in the suburbs of Moscow. You know how this always goes together, just like the Epstein class? Those have their wild orgies and sexual perversions and all the rest of the stuff. Plus, they're summoning the demons type of thing. He planned an exhibition to Tibet to find out information from the legendary Buddhist kingdom of Shambala of Songhame. he believed that ancient civilization hiding beneath the earth's surface and that he could get advanced scientific knowledge that would accelerate the path to communism

and when the communists took over they jumped into all of this you know it is kind of interesting that when you see revolutions a massive societal change and they point this out in this article when empires are dying when others are being born there is a flurry of occultic activity Isn't that interesting? You know, I think that there is a Christian answer for this.

As Satan told Jesus, he said, I can give you any of these kingdoms that you want. And I think that really is what is in operation with all this stuff, especially, especially with the communist. You've got people like the guy who wrote, what is his name, rules for radicals, Saul Winski. Yes, thank you.

Thank you very much, Lance. Saul Linsky. He dedicated his book to Lucifer, right? The original rebel, he said. Well, the special section kicked off a century-long paranormal arms race with surprising legacies that can still be felt today. As a matter of fact, these guys who were pushing this Barchenko and others, they got into all this thing about, well, there's going to be ancient civilizations.

There's going to be hidden scientific knowledge. That's what the occult means, right? Hidden knowledge. And so the Russian fascination with exotic spirituality and sexual perversion predates the Soviet era. Russian Orientalism flourished after the 1858 treaty that granted Tsar lands that formerly belonged to China's Queen dynasty. Russian explorers and academics ventured into Inner Asia and Tibet, the intelligentsia of St. Petersburg snapped up their travel accounts, ethnographic studies and spiritual guidebooks for the imperial capital.

Eastern spirituality met European New Age trends. You had hollow earth theory, meditation, reincarnation, tantric sex, and occultic science. It's all the same stuff. It just keeps repeating. This is what we see with the elites of the Epstein class even today. Both underground movements, socialism and spiritualism, surfaced and joined together in the Bolshevik Kuditav of 1917, the Russian Revolution. Russian Revolution was not just a change in government.

When the boundaries of the church, of the Tsar, and of the empire vanished, they believed that they could reconstruct reality itself. Now, this might sound like this is a Christian writer. This is actually Reason Magazine. They have actually no foothold in Christianity whatsoever, but they can see where this is. When you remove the restraints that are there, the restraints to the church, this is what happens with it. And so they described, there was a book that went into all the stuff that happened in the Russian Revolution. It was called Red Shambala, magic, prophecy, and geopolitics in the heart of Asia.

One psychic skill that these two guys were pushing it through, Bo Kai and Barchenko, lacked, as they pointed out in reason, was the ability to predict the future. They were both executed in the great Stalinist purge, the great terror, as they call it. But their experiments have a long afterlife and were picked up in the United States. United States got wind of it,

and they started doing it themselves. Interestingly enough, you know, and I didn't pick up on this when Trump came out, the Stargate thing. I started thinking of the movie and the TV series, but the CIA named their remote viewing occultic stuff. They named that the

Stargate project. And again, never forget how occultic and satanic luciferian the CIA is. They have always been involved with drugs and channeling and the occult.

The knowledge of Soviet psychic experiments reached America in 1950, CIA officer Edward Hunter introduced the Chinese term brainwashing to English speakers. He wrote a book, Brainwashing and Red China. The Calculated Destruction of Men's Minds. And that really caught on. And so we had a lot of people in 1950s talking about brainwashing. He had the Manchurian candidate, if you remember that movie.

He claimed that the Soviet secret police had taught Chinese communist advanced interrogation techniques. Then we get to the 1970s. Hal Pouthoff, an American electrical engineer with a PhD from Stanford University, began conducting parapsychological experiments at the Stanford Research Institute. He was then approached by the CIA, which told him that Soviets were conducting similar research. So the CIA began sponsoring the activities. That became the Stargate project, investigating how psychic phenomena could be used by the U.S.

for military and intelligence purposes. later immortalized in the film, the men who stare at goats. And of course, that was also, I can't remember the couple. There was a guy who was a Jones, maybe some of the listeners remember him, but his wife, Rima, something or the other,

was a frequent guest with Alex Jones. And I always looked at this, and I thought, why are we talking to people who were involved with the occult of the CIA? the men who stare at goats and how they're going to do remote viewing and projection. This project Stargate results were contested in 2005 interview with Jimmy Carter that the general GQ had. He said that a psychic woman from California who worked with the CIA was able to locate a crashed plane

referred to as a Soviet bomber. She was able to find it, he said, in an African jungle. The woman entered a trance and wrote down a series of coordinates which the Americans used to retrieve the plane. Carter wondered if this was just a, quote, gross coincidence. Well, if it's true, it couldn't possibly be a coincidence. How do you get exact coordinates of a plane by coincidence? And then on the Joe Rogan experience, Puthoff himself claimed the CIA remote viewer reported the evidence of a Soviet typhoon-class submarine before it was public knowledge. There's a lot of these types of stories.

Are any of them true asks reason? An 1983 Defense Intelligence Agency report concluded that the Stargate project was highly variable. It was mixed with much extraneous or inaccurate information. This led to another project. They called it Grill Flame, and this was to establish the reality and the repeatability of the remote viewing phenomenon. And that one concluded that it was a real phenomenon. and a potential threat to U.S. national security. So let's set up another department here,

and we can pay ourselves a lot of money of the black budget. Black budget, indeed. And so, you know, when you look at the Stargate project, again, why would the Trump administration go back to this occultic project title? There's just something there about artificial intelligence and MRA that they were combining

in that Stargate project. expected the first day of the Trump administration? Were they giving you a hat tip about this? Meanwhile, Russia claims that soldiers learned how to read minds. In 2015 interview, the Secretary of Russian Security Council claimed that former U.S. Secretary of State, Madeline Albright, thought that Siberia and the Far East did not belong to Russia and that Americans are jealous of Russia's resource wealth. Albright never publicly said anything along these lines.

I tell you what, though. What they're saying is that a mind reader who figured this out at the same time she was working on this privately. But I got to say, it's not that hard to read that into Madeline Albright's personality that she would do something like that. I think I could do that and I don't claim that I'm a mind reader. Russia's Ministry of Defense magazine claims Russian soldiers have learned to read documents that are locked in safes, regardless of what languages they were in. and can psychically identify terrorists and go days without eating, drinking, or sleeping, they said. So what drives all of this paranormal research? Well, reason thinks that it is basically paranoia.

The fall of empires gives birth to all kinds of bizarre belief systems, they said. And again, I think that is true. It's part of what we're in right now, this fourth turning. It's part of what happens with revolutions. And I think there really is an occultic aspect of this. Though another thing, certainly there is a lot of these people in the intelligence community that are definitely tied into the occult. But with stuff like the remote viewing woman that found the plane or them claiming that, oh, we read her mind, that's how we figured out the context for every action that she's done while she's had power. A lot of that can just be, well, we need a convenient excuse for why we know something.

And we don't want to explain our, you know, intelligence or our technology. So we'll say, oh, well, I read it out of your safe with my mind, not I have a bug in your house. That's true. That's a defense that I think some journalists when they get pulled in by the government. I want you to reveal your sources. Well, I don't have any sources. I just did it with remote viewing. I read their mind and went into their safe with my mind.

That's a novel excuse. and say, and your own intelligence agency says that this is possible. So therefore, I'm not going to give you my source. So anyway, reason just talks it up to paranoia, insecurity, and desperation. Of course, all of those things are constantly factors within these intelligence agencies. But I think so is the occult as well. I think it's just another data point that kind of links us to the Luciferians

and to the UFO stuff and to the deception that I think is going to be there with disclosure. I mean, these people, whether you think it's real or not, it still is a deception. Whether it is something that is supernatural and real, that is a deception. If it's something they're just making it up, that is also a deception. And by the way, if you don't believe any of this stuff is real, it should make you even more skeptical of the UFO disclosure stuff that's there. At the very least, it shows the desperation and the paranoia of those who are desperate to get power and to keep it.

which kind of brings us back to the other movies that are coming out. You know, it's good to see as I look at what Steven Spielberg is doing and the utter garbage and satanic lies that he's selling to people. And all of them. I mean, look at what Hollywood has become. It has become a conduit for the worst Marxist and satanic ideas that you can imagine. And it's kind of interesting when we look at the box offices last week. Star Wars movie, they came out with a new man.

And it just tanked after the first weekend. Just tanked. It dropped 69%, the biggest drop of any Star Wars movie. And yet the same time. So where did it drop? It dropped to like third place. Who are the first two places? These are very small budget films that people are doing on their own.

And so, you know, this is one thing when we look at AI, just like any other tool. It can have good or it can have bad uses. And one of the things that it may. may do is put storytellers who don't have one of these monopolistic movie studios may put them on even footing in terms of production values, right? Because that's one of the big things. It's an obstacle. You know, anybody can have a better story than Hollywood. Their stories are just horrible. I mean, we sit around and say, let's watch a movie and just kick back and relax or something. We look at it and it's like every one of these movies is about the worst kinds of people

during the worst things that you can imagine. And I said, how in the world? We go back to the thing as I was stuck in the hospital a year ago. And we were sitting there, flipping through and watching these different movies, and I just hated them all. And then we went to the Pride and Prejudice one that was done, I think, about 2015. It had such beautiful music and such beautiful cinematography. And I didn't get the story at all because it is so compressed,

that doesn't really follow the book. like the BBC version in 1995, which went back and read it to make sense of the other one. But it was just beautiful eye candy even. And I said, how did they wound up? How did you get people like Jane Austen and Charles Diggin? How did they come up with stories that weren't just about drug dealers and prostitutes and people shooting each other in the back and all this violence and car chase? How did they ever come up with stories that weren't like that?

You know, there's a lot of stories out there that if you come at this from a Christian standpoint, we have truth, we have beauty. And now I think you've got a lot of Christians who are going to be able, I mean, still, you have to have acting, I think. If you try to do this all in terms of AI that's going to show up, but you can do some of the big production things that couldn't be done before, in terms of backgrounds and things like that and compositing, you can use that tool for that.

And it kind of levels the playing field. For example, back rooms was the number one picture, and it was made by 20-year-old director. He spent $10 million on this, and it was number one, beating this fantastically expensive Star Wars Mandalorian movie at the box office. The second place picture was not a $10 million budget. It was a $1 million budget, and it finished. in second place, and it's been out for a couple of weeks, it now has $104 million. They made it for $1 million, and they have now grossed $104 million off of this. And so when you look at this, I always think about the monopoly of Hollywood Studios

and how these Hollywood studios are now consolidating, being bought, and merging, and all the rest of this stuff. You never get rid of monopolies by government regulation. never worked. You know, whether you're talking about Teddy Roosevelt and his trust busters or all the rest of it, that never works. It never stops a monopoly. What stops a monopoly is the fact that it's made obsolete by some new technology or something else that is developed. And I think that's hopefully what we can see happening with the movies as well. One guy who got the ire of the public of the movie business was a guy who's an animator,

and he's now praising how wonderful it is to be able to, quote, unquote, create with AI. His name is Gutierrez. And he said, animating with AI was like having sex and then they hand you the baby. And you skip the pregnancy period here. Because he said, you used to take a very long time to have an idea and to work on it and to have it come to fruition. And he said for someone like me, who's used to waiting so long, this has been a life changer.

Well, I would say the analogy is that if you use AI for this, you've got an idea of where you want to go with something, what happens is they hand you the baby, and then you realize that it's got an extra arm, or it's missing a leg, or its head is on backwards or something like that. That's typically what I've seen when I use AI. It puts in all kinds of extraneous crazy stuff,

and you've got to set there with, with a keen eye and study it to see what additional hallucinating things that's added in the background. You'll get a baby. It won't be your baby and it will be deformed, but it'll be a baby. That's right. Yeah, it'll have a completely different face than it started with and it'll transform throughout the sequence that is doing.

But it will be a baby. And so these people point out, they said the truth is that art is inseparable from the labor that produces it. and any attempt to take that labor out of the equation will produce something that is hollow. I think it's a great way to describe it. It's not just doing the work for you. AI takes the labor that we loatve out, but it also takes out the opportunity to stamp actual intent in it. So he says he's had some people who are pushing back against what he said at this event.

He said, well, let's leave the comments open. So you can get all out in the open and hopefully feel. better. And he says, just don't threat my family with any of this stuff. Well, people didn't get mad enough to do that, but one person nailed it. Said, disappointment is an understatement. It goes against why we tell stories, why we motivate and move people. You discarded something that is priceless. That's right. The actual humanity that is involved with all this. And of course, as this is all happening, and we look at our AI want to be overlords, there was an interesting book that came out from my whistleblower talking about what it was like at Facebook.

Yes, go ahead. Before we move on, I just wanted to say something about what you were just talking about with AI enabling small filmmakers is that, yes, if you just leave it to a machine to do all the work, you're going to get something really weird and kind of trash. But another thing is you can use these tools creatively to get something that you otherwise would have required a huge. budget in the studio for. That's right.

If you have enough effort into getting the right thing, you can still use it well, I believe. Yeah, yeah. You can still, with a lot of effort and a lot of repetition, you can happen upon some interesting backgrounds and settings and things like that that would take a lot of time and money to produce that in the studio. That's why I mentioned that. Well, not just, you know, hitting the button over and over again until you get something good. and stuff like when I wanted the mosquito to fly into the room

and then turn into Bill Gates for that video. I did a while back. I had to first create an image of the mosquito and then an image of the room and have the mosquito in the room and then a whole bunch of steps to get that sequence. Now you might be able to just put that in and get a shot of a mosquito turning as these things get better. Who knows?

Yeah, you have to work with a tool and limitations of it. And of course, when you did the video that was about the Christmas video that we did for the Christmas song we put out last year, you got the model of Jerusalem. And he used that as a reference point and a basis to build on that for the AI video they did. So, yeah, it's still a lot of work. And I guess that's the key is if you don't want to just spin the bottle and come up with whatever random stuff AI generates, If you've got a very definite idea of what you want, it takes a lot of work and thought to do that. But it also saves you a lot of time and money.

If you were over building the actual set, you know, having an artist come in and maybe making a model or whatever or doing a computer CGI, it saves you a lot of time over that. You may still have a lot of things that you have to be very careful about when you put it in. But when we look at what is happening, there's a whistleblower. a book about Meta, about Facebook. And Meta, it was called Carless People. When I first saw it, I thought, careless people, which would I guess also apply. But it was carless people. I don't know what the book is about.

But Meta's lawyers working for Zuckerberg got a gag order put on her, imposing a $50,000 fine for each breach of the order. if she talks about the book. And she should I have been scheduled to go to an event to talk about this. And so she set up there on the dais, and she could not even nod or shake her head, yes or no. That was also included in the order. So she sat there silently while other people talked about her book. They said, blink if you can hear us.

You know, she's basically a hostage. Isn't it interesting that when you've got something to hide, you always resort to censorship? And we have seen this from our government. We see it especially from the Israeli government, from APEC and the rest of them. One of the people that was there was a lawyer. He said, any authoritarian regime naturally gravitates towards silencing its critics. Just remember that. When we talk about Netanyahu or Trump, this absolutely is where we are right now.

And the silencing that is going on is something that we've been experiencing for a very long time. Think about all the silencing of critics of vaccines and the pandemic has been going on now for six years and continuing to go on. But it actually goes back even further than that. A secret trial of a Pfizer-RS vaccine killed at least two infants back in the 1960s. Their families just found out about it. and they are suing the government. The families of two black infants who died in a 1960s government RSV vaccine trial have filed a federal lawsuit alleging that researchers enrolled the children

without parental knowledge, without parental consent. They also claim, listen to this, they used tissue samples from the dead babies to contribute to the development of the current RSV vaccines. I talk about the moral implications of this. Now you have a moral handle that you can object to these vaccines being compelled under your children as well. Now, this came from the NIH, the famous NIH. In 1965 and 66, they subjected dozens of infants, most are all of them from low-income black families to a testing of Pfizer's lot 100 experimental vaccine for RSV.

A couple of these infants later died after developing vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease, a severe respiratory illness that is caused by the vaccine. And so a lot of them will say they said that what happens, they get this vaccine, and if they get exposed to RSV, they get a much worse case. of it than they did. I would say another way to look at this is perhaps it is the vaccine itself that is harming them. Either way, it says something about this myth of vaccine immunity, doesn't it, as well as safety. So these families allege that federal researchers fail to obtain informed consent from the parents. They withheld critical information about prior vaccine failures.

And they continued the study, despite mounting evidence, the vaccine was causing severe reactions and participants. And again, we see from this that COVID was not their first rodeo. They've been doing this kind of stuff for decades. Again, this is going back 60 years. The complaint also alleges that tissue samples from these dead babies later were used to develop the RSV vaccines and the monoclonal antibody shots that have been approved over the last several years, a gigantic financial win for Pfizer. Medical research in the U.S. has a long troubled racial history, said the complaint. But even more so, it has a long anti-human history, doesn't it?

They don't care what they do to us, as long as they can make some money. The families were even unaware that the babies had been subjected to the experiment until a reporter from Undark Magazine contacted them while investigating the story back in 2023. The reporter found the baby's names in a doctor's government-issued lab notebook and other paperwork from the clinical trial reported the Times. The NIH researchers developed the experimental vaccine in the early 1960s using a method similar to the one used to develop a polio vaccine. They administered the shots to over 50 children in hospital known. to have largely black patient population. Nearly half the babies got RSV.

Ten of them required hospitalization. An NIH researcher who led the study later conceded that, quote, it was possibly outside the range of normal. Yeah, right. But instead of halting the program, the researchers partnered with Pfizer to create a more concentrated version of the shot. That was known as Lot 100, according to the lawsuit. Pfizer tested that on, listen to the test that they did, animal tests.

Four mice, four guinea pigs and 25 monkeys. And they said, all right, it's done. We can use babies next. And that's what they did. Yeah, it was possibly outside the range of normal. Nearly half of them developed RSV. Normally, you don't get 50% RSV. That's slightly outside, possibly.

Isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing? Yeah. But by the way, you know, they tested it on four months. four guinea pigs and 25 monkeys and said we're done with the testing and if you don't think that they had developed you know that's more than they did for COVID unless you believe that DARPA had this thing a long time ago and knew exactly what they had in terms of a bio weapon that is also a possibility well that's 33 animals more than they tested the COVID shots went that's right

unless they did it just to make sure they had something that was lethal. Who knows? I mean, they've been working on this scheme for a long time. I wouldn't put any of that past them. Before we go to a break, we've got some comments here. Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, Liberty Conspiracy, as Guard's program that airs on Twitter as well. Is it on Rumble, I think, as well?

Anyway, Guard says there's nothing as reassuring to a plaintiff than gaining control of the justice system in which your suit is being decided. Absolutely right. Narway and Erigate's ministry says six bankrupted companies. One, a casino, 34 felony convictions, fleecing billions from taxpayers, using the DOJ as his personal law firm, crushing all that stands in his way. Trump's settlement for $1.776 billion is a direct smack in the face and in front to the leverage against the people through taxation.

Trump is looting the treasury and laughing. Yeah, that's why, you know, John Stewart was just beside himself with rage. And he's trolling us. He's trolling us with all this stuff. This is beyond corruption. This is a taunting that he's doing, I think. You're absolutely right. Highboos says, remember the whole theme of Raiders of the Lost Ark?

They wanted the Ark for a holy weapon. Very occultic. That's right. That's right. And they use theology for that now, don't they? The Zionists. They've got their holy weapon. They're using this imaginary third temple as a holy weapon, just as they found their justification for it. And you've got people like Pete Hegsseth that are all about that. It's just beyond anything that I can tolerate here. Trumpberger, I'm more worried about the people like Paula White than the occult. Yeah, she is there as well. Yeah, same thing. And the mamma, da-da-da, you know,

just being in tongues and grabbing all the cash. She can get on the way out. AP Rumble Seat, according to the whistleblowers, finally coming towards Silicon Valley elite circles are highly satanic. Yeah, that's absolutely a part of it, I think. We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we will be right back. When we come back, we're going to talk about the prohibition of everything

that is happening right now. And you will not believe all the different movements to prohibit all the different things that are out there. We'll be right back. Defending the American Dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show. APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device. Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.

Well, here's the latest one from the gun grabbers. In Maryland, they want to ban all. Glock's because there is a Glock switch that can be used to turn it into fully auto. Well, the Glock switch is already illegal, which in a sense kind of highlights the futility of what they're trying to do. They banned the Glock switch, which doesn't have any other use except to make it fully auto. But the Glock gun itself has plenty of other uses, legitimate uses as well.

And so because there is this illegitimate, let's say, switch, which again, I don't even, I'm an absolutist when it comes to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, I'm an absolutist on free speech. I'm an absolutist on the Second Amendment as well. I think the Constitution said something about shall not infringe. And it doesn't say anything at all about the rule that the Supreme Court put in saying that, well, if this is a gun that is in common use, then that is something that you can't prohibit. And that's what some of the people, the gun groups, are falling back on, is that Supreme Court decision. But the Constitution doesn't say that.

The Constitution says, shall not be infringed. And so, but even from a logical standpoint, if you look at this Glock switch that is there, isn't that a failure of prohibition? What we have here is a failure to communicate and a failure to prohibit. because if their prohibitions worked, they wouldn't need to ban the Glock because they already banned the switch. Yes, Lance. Well, the criminals don't respect the switch ban. That's right.

But they will respect the gun ban, right? Well, it's interesting that they put in a lot of exceptions to this. They put in exceptions for law enforcement officers. They get exceptions to this. They put in exceptions for immediate family transfers, for inheritances, for circumstances, for certain gunsmith repairs, but in an exception for current owners and so forth. But still, the stupidity and the arrogance of the Maryland legislature, the Senate passed it by 28 to 16. The House passed it 91 to 40, big measures. Baltimore mayor and the Maryland

Attorney General and other officials have also pursued Glock through litigation, which both the Second Amendment and a specific law that was passed saying you will not sue gun manufacturers for just general gun regulation. And that's what they're trying to do. They said if they make something and they haven't done anything that is defective, in other words, they're not giving the gun owners a kind of immunity that they give to the vaccine makers. Yeah, when we're talking about shots, you might want to think about the shots that are ringing out from Pfizer and these people. But the gun owners don't get that kind of immunity. They get the kind of immunity that Ford does. If you've got some guy who takes a Ford Bronco and he drives through a

parade, as happened a few years ago, you don't have people saying, well, we're going to sue Ford. And it's the same thing with a gun like this. And so there was actually a law that codified that because they could see this coming from the Democrats. They're desperate to try any absurd angle that they can to remove guns. And just the patently absurd thing of, oh, well, the people that commit a lot of crimes tend to like Glockes. A lot of crimes are committed with Glockes. So if we ban Glockes, these crimes will happen less. Yeah, yeah. It just happens to be a very popular gun, popular with law enforcement as well as lawbreakers. And it is very unpopular with the people who want to break the Constitution.

Glock switches are already illegal. So under federal and Maryland law, So the new law burdens future lawful buyers because criminals misuse illegal parts. The measure would prohibit an entire class of lawfully made and lawfully sold handguns. And, of course, the Supreme Court's decision about the Second Amendment protects weapons that are, quote, in common use. That is not what the Constitution says. Constitution says shall not infringe. Nevertheless, it gets even worse. Up in Washington State, they're going to soon treat speeders like drunk drunk,

drivers, then they're going to require you to buy a device that is going to control your car. Serious speeding violations. And what do they mean by serious speeding violations? 10 miles over the speed limit. If you're in a speed zone of 40 miles per hour or below, or 20 miles over the speed limit on faster roads, that is a called a dangerous driver. I think the bottom line is they don't want anybody to have any guns and they don't want anybody to be able to drive any cars.

They want you to be forced into the cars that they control, along with their partner corporations. It's actually worse than the refilizers they put on cars for drunks. If you commit drunk driving, you get much less than what they would put on these speeder things. Restricting someone's top speed and acceleration can have a serious effect for safety. There are times when for your safety and for others, you need to be able to accelerate.

That's right. That's right. And so, again, you know, putting these kind of governors on there, it's just another prohibition, but I think it's a prohibition that is ultimately aimed at human drivers. I have had more than my share of time in traffic court for speeding tickets, I got to say. And I have noticed while I'm sitting there, because I always contest it. And I've noticed while I was sitting there, the people who are there for drunk driving, I've seen them get off, even though they were repeat offenders.

I remember one in particular where there was a guy he was a commercial pilot. And he had a lawyer, and his lawyer said, you know, the prosecuting attorney is talking about his long history of drunk driving. And his lawyer gets up and he says, yeah, judge, but, you know, if he gets a drunk driving conviction, that's going to cause him to lose his career as a commercial pilot. And so it's like, oh, well, we've got to have mercy on him over that. So how dangerous is it if you are a drunk pilot? I mean, this is one of the worst case scenarios. I think I just walked.

He let him go. And so he's got multiple drunk driving convictions. But hey, if you go 10 miles over the speed limit, we're going to take your license or whatever. I'm going to try to do that. So if it becomes known how dangerous and reckless this man is, they won't trust him with the lives of hundreds of people on a regular basis. Yeah.

As a matter of fact, here's an article about the loophole that puts drunk truck. truckers back on the road. I mean, these are people who are driving 80,000 pound semi-trailers, right? Federal database has been built to flag and remove drunks and drugged truckers, right? People driving on the influence of something. And yet, there's a loophole in it where they have these organizations that can supposedly rehabilitate them and then remove them off of the list. And so they got these people who are gaming the systems. They just come in, you pay them. They take your name off the list. What if a current alcoholic or a drug addict could immediately get back behind the wheel

by paying a third party to simply check off a box inside of the database? That's how Brandon Blackburn, 34, was able to get back on the road. He was arrested last year on charges of driving while impaired in a construction zone with cocaine in his possession. He said his prohibited status was cleared by another man who simultaneously runs a trucking company and advertises his substance abuse professional services across a network of trucking-related Facebook groups. Blackburn and others appear to operate within a network of actors who have been exploiting a loophole

and federal rules to illegitimately clear prohibited commercial drivers. So what they're doing is, you know, they set up a rehabilitation program. Then, evidently, the federal government has given the people running these rehabilitation programs, the ability to say, all right, you know, we've cleared him. He's good to go now. and they can remove it themselves without engaging anybody else as a third party. And so they revealed evidence as presented by freight waves. Freight waves is a news outlet that focuses on transportation and shipping and that type of thing.

And they did the research. They gave it to the Epic Times. Epic Times then verified every facet they said of the story. They said, this is, believe it or not, as crazy as this is, it's true. Blackburn admitted to the epic times that he cleared drivers who had been flagged with drug or alcohol violations, even though he didn't have the necessary certification to do so. He claimed some of the people that he helped had their licenses incorrectly flagged in the system. He said, but still, he could do it to anybody that he wanted.

And so at the same time, we have these drunk drivers, and they want to put a governor now on anybody who goes like 10 miles over the speed limit. you buy a separate device that's going to control your car while they're letting drunk semi-drivers go. And then you got recently a bus driver who killed an entire family. Doesn't speak English. He could not speak English. He had a charter bus. He plowed into vehicles in Virginia last Friday morning, killing five people, including an entire family of four. This guy's name is Jing Dong.

He's Chinese. He killed five people, including the entire family of four from Massachusetts. A 45-year-old man is 44-year-old wife, their 13-year-old daughter, and their seven-year-old son. He is a naturalized citizen who doesn't read or speak English. My first question is, how do you become an American citizen if he doesn't read or speak English? That is a problem as well. And he got his license in New York State in 2024. The bus operator allegedly is a corporation that has a registered address in North Carolina

at an apartment unit. So it doesn't look like a legitimate company that he's running working for either. And so again, the people who are legitimate trucking companies and freight brokers are trying to pull this as well as the other case, you know, make these examples. for reform. But my question is, you know, you're going to hammer drivers with excessive speed tickets while drunk drivers as semis get off. And non-English speakers not only get citizenship, but a commercial driver's license. Is it that they don't like Americans or is that they don't like humans in general? So we've got the robotaxies are just exploding all over the place.

and we just had Waymo pulled their vehicles off of several different cities because they've had a lot of problems recently. They've had situations of them going through flooded zones. But this particular one, they had a couple of passengers, and this Waymo went into a construction zone. And all of a sudden it starts getting chased by a whole bunch of cops, and there's two passengers in it, right? A guy in his fiancé.

And they're looking at this, and goes to a construction zone. All the cops are chasing it with lights and sirens going on. And the thing speeds up and starts running from the cops. Well, the AIs have to copy what they've seen. They know what you do when the cops are chasing you. That's right. I guess this large language model has watched Dukes of Hazard a long time.

But it doesn't have a horn that's like Dixie. Imagine being in a self-driving car and it decides to run from the police. That's what they said. was the funny thing about it. The guy said, I told my fiance, we're going to die. We've had the wayward Waymos video in the deck for

a few days if you want. Yeah, go ahead and play that. It was the craziest thing ever saw that a Waymo would run from the cops. Wayward Waymos. This video here captured several of the self-driving cars just clogging up a neighborhood cul-de-sac. The people living

in the Northwest Atlanta neighborhoods say dozens end up circling their community. Channel 2, Steve Gelbach is on one street where they want the Waymo's to stop. It's almost every little cul-de-sac around our area, so I think it's a real problem. Waymo after Waymo after Waymo enter this dead-end street, usually early in the morning. I think yesterday morning we had 50 cars that came through between six and seven. Neighbors on Battleview Drive started seeing the autonomous driverless cars two months ago, but the groupings and large number of Waymo's just started circling in and out in the last couple weeks.

They even shared video with us when neighbors used this little guy to put him right out here in the street to block the Waymos from getting into the cul-de-sac and you can imagine what happened next. And we had at one thing that were stuck trying to figure out how to turn around. The Waymoes are empty and not picking anyone up. Parents are worried, not only calling it excessive but dangerous. We're families. We have small kids. We have animals and pets. We've got kids getting on the bus in the mornings.

And it just doesn't feel safe to have that traffic. Neighbors reached out to Waymo and have not got a response. They've also contacted their council member, representatives, and GDOT, don't know what to do. We would just like to see them stay on main traffic roads. I don't think there's any reason to be on small residential cul-de-sacs if they're not picking up somebody. Steve Gelbach, Channel 2, Action News. Meanwhile, Waymo is recalling thousands of its cars because of a software issue. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says the self-driving cars detect flooded roads,

but still continue to drive through the. them. Weimo says a software update will help, however the company admits it has not fully solved the problem. Well, and of course, as Lance said, we've had that video on the deck for several days, probably over a week that we've had that there. And this incident of it running from the police happened after that. And so they referenced back to the flooded zones, to the, the cul-de-sac, looping and all. You know, when you look into this, weren't the leftists all about, well, let's not have excessive driving. We've got to limit the amount of driving that people do.

And that includes even the electric cars. But now they're not worried about that at all. They just put empty Waymoes to just drive around at random. And so Waymo has now pulled its cars from freeways in San Francisco, L.A., Phoenix, and Miami, after this Waymo ran from the police. The couple was looking to get home only for Waymo to veer off of a high. highway and accelerate at terrifying speeds while driving down a construction lane. All the while, the police vehicles were trying to chase it down with sirens blaring.

There were construction signs. There were lights going on police in the distance. And it sped up. That's what I looked at my phone saying, said, we're done. This is it. Like Bill Paxton. We're going to die here. We're going to buy it on this rock here.

What I thought was interesting was the thing eventually slowed down because they had somebody, I guess, in India, who took over control of the Waymo. And then they come over the speaker in the car. And they said, they talked to them and said, came on the line and said, from what I could see, it seemed like this was a stressful experience for you. So what do you want to do next? And he says, well, I was like saying, we want to get out of this. They're like, well, do you want to continue the journey? He said, absolutely not. And so then they offered him a $40 worth of free rides for his trouble. But I thought it was interesting because, you know, these people are watching the entire time from some other country, somewhere in the world. And so,

that's an amazing gift. Sorry that you got into a car chase with the cops. Here's $40 worth with a gift certificate for more rides. Let's hope that doesn't happen again. Really, yeah. So anyway, they're going back to the drawing board and they're going to review what's going on with their cars because they've got a lot of issues. But what we're talking about prohibition, again, you know, they're pushing very hard to prohibit drivers.

Here's Oregon who's trying to prohibit all hunting, all fishing, and most farming. This is truly amazing. Proposed legislation would outlaw killing or injuring any animal even while hunting. And this would also include fishing. You're not going to be able harm the fish by catching them and eating them. The measure in Oregon has gathered over 120,000 signatures,

more than the 117,000 they need to get onto the ballot in November. But of course, whenever you collect petition signatures, they've got to be validated. And a lot of them will not be validated. But they still have another couple of months in order to gather signatures. The law aims to expand the standards. state's animal cruelty laws and remove exemptions from such laws that apply to various occupational and recreational activities. It would prohibit hunting, fishing, using animals and rodeos,

castrating or neutering livestock, or conducting scientific research on animals. It would also prohibit slaughtering livestock, so you're not going to be able to have any Oregon-grown meat either as well. I remember we had things we really enjoyed in Texas. We moved there for three years after we got married for three years. We were married and we loved to go to the rodeo.

As a matter of fact, they had a small rodeo that's outside of Houston where we lived in a small community and they had a rodeo every Saturday night and it was an amateur rodeo and it was covered. So rain or shine, they would have that rodeo and then there'd be a dance afterwards. And so we used to do that all the time with

our friends at Texas Instruments. We had a lot of stories about that because you would see these guys who are amateurs out there. And the cowboys are getting really seriously hurt. Not the bulls, however. The bulls were coming out just fine. As a matter of fact, I saw them carry back in the day. Now they have these guys who do the bull riding and stuff.

Many of them wear helmets and they wear chest protection to protect their ribs and things like that. Back in the day, they just wore a cowboy hat, and I saw them get very, very seriously injured. We would see the same animals week after week. They actually introduced them by name. They took very good care of their animals. They were not abusing them. When we went to North Carolina, there was a rodeo that finally came through there and said, yeah, let's go to the rodeo. I haven't seen that for a while. And there are all these protesters out there. And I said, you know, you really don't understand the first thing about rodeo. These people would not stay in business if they couldn't take care of their animals.

And so, yeah, they might do something to annoy a horse to make him kick. But it's not anything that's going to harm them. Take your dog. We had a dog that we put little booties on in the snow. And we did that because he had this kind of hair that when you run through the snow, it just got all balled up. It was amazing. So he put some booties on him.

And you've probably seen the videos of dogs or cats when you put something on their feet. and how they start walking, you know, with really high feet. It's pretty comical. But, you know, you can do that type of thing and not, you know, that's not cruelty to the dog or the cat. And so they would do things like that in the rodeo, but they would take good care of their animals. Nevertheless, Oregonians would be forced into either a vegan lifestyle

or they would have to rely on food that was shipped in from other states or countries. Not too much of the food costs. Farmers, ranchers that have livestock that are now going to be out of business, I mean, if they get this pass, which I don't think it'll pass, but it's still amazing that they came this far. Well, it is Oregon. I mean, we're talking about Portland and things like that. It's got a chance of passing. They've had 120,000 people sign the petition.

Yeah. But they know that's going to put a lot of farms out of business. And so they've got a big fund that is going to give money to the people for job retraining for income replacement. Get rid of the farmers. Just put them all on welfare. That'll solve. it. That's right. It's absolutely insane, but it is Oregon. And Oregon is a beautiful place, but Portland is absolutely crazy. It criminalizes ranchers, farmers, and meat producers,

and it threatens to kill thousands of jobs. It would redefine even if you're going to do breeding practices, it redefines that as sexual assault. So, you know, the Jeffrey Epstein billionaire class can go free, but if you're involved in animal husbandry, you're going to get labeled as a sex offender if you're a farmer who's breeding animals. Farmers and their livestock, as well as veterinarian breeders, animal owners who could become criminally liable for these practices that are essential to the animal's health, to food production, and to genetic management.

So already you've got the Oregon Hunters Association is organizing to push back against this if it gets on the ballot and comes up in November. but it looks like it's going to make the ballot. They've still got another 30 days to collect signatures. Meanwhile, in another prohibition, you have Mercedes Benz may be shut out of the U.S. market under a Trump administration bill that is aimed at Chinese automaker ownership. The problem is that Mercedes biggest single shareholder is now a corporation that is largely owned by the Chinese government itself.

which this bill that is circulating in Congress would prohibit then Mercedes from being sold in America. Even though Mercedes has American manufacturing facilities and employs more than 10,000 people in the U.S., they would be barred from doing business here. This is the kind of genius move being made by the central planners and the formerly conservative GOP, now that's been taken over by a New York Democrat Donald Trump. So the bill is currently a House-only initiative with no companion in the Senate. So it may not pass, but it's just boneheaded stupid. As a matter of fact, there's other, you only have to have 15% ownership.

And so that would exclude Mercedes as well as Volvo and some smaller manufacturers like Lotus would be excluded from being able to sell cars in America. And so that is the insanity of where we are right now. We're going to take a quick break. And before we do, we're going to read the comments here. About AI, Wally Waller, it says, I think live theatrical performances will make a big comeback. I agree.

I do think so, yeah. Narrow-way, narrow gate ministry. I think it's going to be a big blowback. People are going to be looking for all kinds of things that are authentic. You actually might have a revival of live music. which has disappeared. You know, we've gone down this logical consequence. Live music was something that was, had quite a bit of that,

especially in Florida, where I was in college. And so there were a lot of opportunities, if you're a musician, to play live music, that pretty much is dried up even in tourist-heavy areas like Florida. But I can see with all of this, you know, it went from that to studio musicians, to disc jockeys. Now, if you go into artificial intelligence, and you can just give it a prompt, and say, you know, create this genre of song, and here's a subject that generates the lyrics and all the and the rest of the stuff, and it's really not very good. I can see people wanting to get back to

genuine stuff. As a matter of fact, I go back, if I get on YouTube, and I see a special where you had, let's say, Andy Williams or something, somebody who could really sing live, and they still have a lot of this stuff on YouTube. You go back and you see something like that and you think, wow, that was live. These guys did that live. It's very impressive. And I think people are going to be really hungry. for that kind of authenticity. Narroway, Narragate Ministry said, Pfizer just announced a new Lyme disease, MRA vaccine.

Yeah, problem solution. First, the, first you have the Plum Island crazy people. Give you, create Lyme disease. Now you've got a vaccine from Pfizer. Man. Big Brit is back again and says Google is going to release millions of mosquitoes.

Yeah, they keep doing that. The device, this type of device in terms of speed control, is going to be on all new cars. I agree, absolutely. What's to stop you, as a matter of fact? We've already got, if you've got some kind of a navigation program, usually it'll tell you what the speed limit is. It knows where the speed is and all these different areas where you're driving.

It'll give you a warning if you're over the speed. So what's to stop them from just making that next connection to automatically give you a ticket and automatically ding your insurance rates? And Eric Peters and I have talked about this for a long time. I mean, they're right at the, all they have to do is, just pull the trigger and they can basically make it impossible for you to own, drive, and ensure a car. It's very, very close to that happening.

Hi, Boo says, what about we just use humans to drive cars? Let's make a law about driverless cars. I'm all for that, absolutely. C.J. Pumble says, you can only harm animals with wind, solar, and data centers. That'll be permitted, but nothing else. And only the elites can be involved in sexual assault, and they can do that not only to animals, but to children and other human beings as well. That's the direction that we're now headed. U.S.A. honesty and sincerity says they'll just import meat from Argentina.

Yeah, there are buddies. We like Javier Malai, don't we? So much so that we'll shut down American farms while we give him massive subsidies. We're going to take a quick break. That really goes into why you need something like in a lot. electoral college because of cities like Portland trying to shut down all farming and cross the entire state. Yeah, when you just go with simple democratic voting rather than having jurisdictional areas, and we saw that happening in North Carolina as well, in the county in which we lived, we had,

we bordered on Chapel Hill, which was a university town and had very liberal people. And we were living in a rural area that was mostly farms that had been there for generations. And what happened was you had a lot of these people who spilled out of the Chapel Hill area into this county. And they had a big agenda of what they would like to do. And they wanted to make sure that these rural farms were never sold and never developed. So it's like, yeah, we've got all this development here in this northern corner of the county, but we don't want any more people like us to come in. So we're going to stop all this. And we're going to tell the farmers what can and cannot do with their property.

And so they got a lot of pushback against that. And at the time, the county commissioners were elected based on territorial areas. And so these people very wisely and deceptively said, we're going to change it so that all the county commissioners are elected at large. So everybody in the entire county could vote for every one of the county commissioners. Once they did that, they had a large, politically active, leftist block of people in that area. and they elected an entire slate of county commissioners, and they took away the property rights of these farmers.

They'd been there for a very long time. That's the way this works. And that's why that really underscored with me the importance of having jurisdictional representation, which is really what the Constitution was set up to enforce and why we have the congressional districts. But now, of course, they've got the jurymandering and all the rest of this stuff.

We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight, show. Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles, and the sweet sounds of Motown. Find them on the oldies channel at APSRadio.com.

Yeah, we've got a comment here from AP Rumble Seed and absolutely right says, and God knows what they're vaccining these animals with. That's the real cruelty. Yeah, the Trump administration thing, we're going to kill all these chickens unless you let us use an MRA vaccine for bird flu. Who knows what else they're doing?

As we went to break, Lance reminded me of a cartoon. You know, we just had Ferrari come out with an electric car and the immediate response to it in the marketplace was such that it sent their stock plummeting. It's not only an electric car, but it's kind of like a glass coating or something like it. And it reminded me of what Eric Peters has always said about devices. He said these EVs are becoming devices.

Well, this is as close as anybody has come to making their car a smartphone by putting this. glass covering on it. But there's been a lot of pushback. And Lance reminded me of this cartoon that he found. Go ahead and show that cartoon, Lance. And here it is Enzo Ferrari, and it's got a picture of his casket there. And they're going to attach that to a generator.

And as he spins in his grave, that generator is going to generate electricity to power this new electric Ferrari that is there. I thought that's a brilliant cartoon. Yeah, Enzo Ferrari is spinning in his grave. let's talk about this will be something make your head spin. Congress is quietly moving to integrate U.S. and Israeli militaries. Just when you thought that the foreign control of our government couldn't get any worse, here we have these people in Congress who've been bought

and owned by the Israelis are now putting something into the next NDAA. And remember this NDAA, you know, whenever they want to get something to pass, it can be completely unrelated to defense. And they put it in the NDAA because they know that it's always going to pass. They always make sure they get that through. It would all but merge these two countries armed forces together. This is an article from responsible statecraft. As they point out at the time, when the American public is expressing unprecedented levels of distrust in the Israeli government, Congress has proposed tying the U.S. to the Israeli military more than ever before. The 27 National Defense Authorization Act, the NDAA, has a new section 224, which is entitled United States

Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative. The provision would do arguably more to intertwine the U.S. military with the Israeli military. And this has been something that they've been doing for a long time and really kind of keeping it concealed from Americans. Here's a former CIA officer talking about how they hide the amount of money that they give to Israel. The normal procurement process goes through State Department because State Department is the one that does government-to-government relations. It's moving that out of that public, you know, something that can be monitored by the

public and put it basically into a classified channel where the public will never know what Israel's actually getting. That's right. And it's going to get much worse. As a matter of fact, we know that Israel has gotten since 1948 and its founding $200 billion from the American government, from the American taxpayer. All of these things are being done to be able to increase the amount of money that we're giving to Israel without you knowing about it.

Section 224 lays the groundwork for bilateral research and development, for co-production of weapons, joint ventures, licensing agreements, every manner of U.S. Israeli military industrial complex cooperation. The U.S. and Israel already worked together heavily on missile defense, but this would greatly expand coordination to seemingly every area of defense tech, including AI, quantum, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech and many more. It also proposes network integration and data fusion.

In other words, the U.S. military's data could soon be the data of the Israeli military. Or in other words, all the stuff that they're constantly collecting about every American is going to be handed over to the Israelis, along with the best AI tech we've got. And when you look at how there. to be capable of piloting autonomous drones to kill people. And when you look at how they are weaponizing any criticism of the Israeli government, first of all, calling it racist because that's the standard technique, but you've got all these different states as well as other jurisdictions

who are criminalizing any criticism of Israel. How is this going to be used? This would provide a higher level of military industrial integration than the U.S. has with any other country in the world. The U.S. currently works closely with NATO partners to co-produce and to share supply chains. However, the number one arms dealer in the world, as the number one arms dealer, the U.S. provides weapons to militaries around the globe, but that is mostly a one-way street. Section 224 would be a different beast entirely. It would further refuse the U.S. and Israeli military sectors in multiple areas vital to the battlefields of the future, like autonomous systems and cyber. It would also bring extraordinary Israeli influence to the U.S. beyond what has already happened through the Israeli lobby and its robust network of social media influencers.

So again, you can expect weaponized surveillance and weaponized censorship because they are demanding. demanding this over and over again. For example, here is the guy who is the father-in-law of Kevin Warsh who Trump just put in charge of the Federal Reserve. This guy is a multi-billionaire. His family is from the Estee Lauder Foundation. And he is the president of the World Jewish Congress. And he is addressing this organization here.

You'll hear them cheer when he talks about how he wants to punish. punish anybody who criticizes the government of Israel. All world leaders, all politicians must lead in this effort. Words are not enough. Political speeches are not enough. Laws must be passed severe, tough, real laws that will put these hate mongers away in prison for a long time. Yeah, if you don't like the state of Israel, we'll put you in prison.

You've already seen this in Florida. Seeing some people like Congressman Fine and also from DeSantis. Words are not enough in response to words. That's right. Yeah, you can't meet the words. Yeah, if you say words we don't like, we'll put you in prison. It's not enough just to have a debate or exercise free speech. We have to take away your freedom to move and put you in prison.

As a matter of fact, you had Glenn Greenwald went on with Tucker Car, And they were talking about the fact that there are 36 states where there is no criticism of Israel allowed. It never got a lot of attention. And it drives me very crazy to this day because it's so preposterous. And it really predates October 7th. I would say it's now up to 35 or 36 states in the United States, the vast majority of which are red states, but not all, that have enacted laws that make it a requirement if you want a government contract that you certify. that you do not support a boycott of Israel. And a lot of people who had contracts before this law was passed ended up getting fired because they refused. There have been hurricane relief aid that cities have conditioned on signing a form

that says you don't support a boycott of Israel. There have been all kinds of firings in universities for people who criticized Israel. So it's been developing for quite a while. It's not like it just started. Hurricane release. was predicated on a signed statement that you don't support a boycott for Israel? In other words, you don't even have to be actively boycotting Israel, but if you conceptually support it, you can't get hurricane relief, emergency disaster aid?

Is that true? First of all, this is the kind of thing that I know people don't believe unless they go look at it up. You know, it's so shocking. I know. If I didn't see it myself, I also wouldn't. Imagine what they're going to do when they merge with defense. That's a conspiracy theor saying crazy stuff. No, that actually is something that was instituted in many places.

Different kinds of language, but mostly it requires that you certify that you don't participate in a boycott of Israel. In order to get a state contract or in order to get hurricane relief, there were HHS regulations once RFK took over that were forced on by the administration that said certain grants you can't get unless you certify that. you're not supporting a boycott of Israel. I'm talking about grants for research that would help Americans' health that would then got conditioned on this sort of thing. So this has been something that has been going on for a while. Let me just say one of the things, Tucker.

Of course, they'll weaponize everything. And whenever we get money from the government for any purpose, think about this if you're a homeschooled or whatever. Whenever you take money from the government, they will weaponize it. They will use it to bribe you initially, then they will use it to blackmail you. And so we are not surprised me to see stuff like this. But, you know, a lot of, yes, what do you want to say?

Well, we've talked about how I've looked into manufacturing in the U.S. and watched videos about people trying to put a product on the market. And one thing that I've seen several people mention is that the one sector of manufacturing in the U.S. is being driven by one piece of legislation that says the government can't purchase anything that the military might use from any, overseas seller. So anything that is going to the military or put on a ship or any of that, that has to be built in the U.S. and that's basically all the U.S. manufacturing that's left. So in other words, if you're a manufacturer in one of these 36 states, your biggest potential client, probably your

biggest client, is threatened if you support conceptually a boycott of Israel. That's right. Yeah. Same thing they were doing to Anthropic. They said, well, we're going to label them as a supply chain risk. And that means that nobody that we buy from can use their product either, right? And so when Trump is putting in his tariffs and other things like that, what does he use as justification? Well, we have to buy American. You know, we can't be dependent on a foreign government because, I don't know, they might blackmail us or something. And yet you've got Jonathan Pollard, who continually brags about the fact.

done at least two different interviews, continually bragging about the fact that Israel blackmailed the United States over nuclear weapons. Not only they steal the nuclear weapons from us, then they threatened to drop the nuclear weapons on neighboring states unless we gave them aid. And after we gave them aid, then the Arab countries enacted the OPEC boycott against us in 173 that had massive implications for the United States as well as globally in terms of an oil shock that happened then and yet what is driving a lot of this as you heard Glenn Greenwald say a lot of this is coming from red states why is that coming from red states well there is a religious component to this you have a lot of Christian Zionists who always talk

about Judeo-Christian values and Judeo-Christian this and that and allies here's a good example of of what Judeo-Christianism is really about. Here's Ben Shapiro. You know, from a Jewish point of view, where we don't believe in the divinity of Christ, I think that there you can make an argument that the gospels, which were written, he was just a prophet.

No, no, no, we don't even believe he was a prophet. What do you think he was? They think he was, historically. I think he was historically. I think he was a Jew who tried to lead a revolt against the Romans and got killed for his trouble, just like a lot of other Jews at that time who were crucified for trying to lead revolts against the Roman

and got killed for their trouble. So he became legend in story, and it became a bigger and bigger deal as time were wrong. group of followers and then that gradually grew and then there was resurrected no that's not that's not a jewish belief okay just want to yeah no we're not into you're not in the miracle stories no that's no no no not not by jesus they're there's the old testament like i can't join a church i assume i don't believe the things that people in the church believe you probably could if you don't and of course that's fine he can believe whatever he wants but you know he doesn't believe the old

testament either he also said and i think it was that same interview with joe rogan he has asked Well, do you believe that Moses part of the right? I don't believe that. Yeah, I got this Jewish rabbi who said that it was a wind. And that was really what it was. There wasn't anything supernatural about that. The bottom line, the reason I play that clip is because the people always talk about Judeo-Christian values and all the rest of this stuff.

They need to understand this is not simply about them rejecting Christ as the Messiah. They reject the Old Testament as well. It has become a rabbinic tradition. And they don't pay much attention to. the Bible as you and I know it. But you have heard Ben Shapiro push the Noahide laws. Well, the very first Noahide law says, you know, it's very simple. They reduce the Ten Commandments down to seven. They keep idolatry, but guess what? They consider all Christians to be idolaters because we believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. So this is not simply about a rejection of the New Testament. They reject

across the board and they seek to impose another standard there as well. But we are told that there's going to be all kinds of punishments against people who criticize the foreign government of Israel because that is supposedly hatred of all Jewish people. And yet when you look at what is happening in Israel itself, you can see the clear hatred that Israelis have for Christians. The soldiers are spitting too. the soldier in uniform and this is you know, you know, people in uniform spitting on you. What shall I say?

A recent video of a nun attacked in broad daylight has caused widespread shock. Many Christians in Israel say intimidation and spitting have become commonplace. Abbott Nicodemus Schnabel says he faces threats almost daily when he walks through Jerusalem. It's a young monk. They're really spitting on me in the nighttime. you know, in dark alleys without eyewitnesses because they know if I attack the monk, it's not accepted. Now it's during daylight, people around and they don't care. Israeli organizations report a sharp rise in violent attacks on Christians.

At the same time, initiatives promoting interfaith dialogue are coming under increased pressure. vast majority of Israelis think it's a very severe incident and these people have to punish severely. but I think there's no enough condemning from the authorities, from the government, from the politician. The opposite, they're kind of inflaming and inciting the atmosphere. Yeah, so the Jewish lady is saying, she said, those of us who, we think there's too much of this, they need to be punished, but it's the government.

It's the Netanyahu government that is not punishing them. And yet, you have, Bibi says that Israel is the safest country for Christians. And here's what that looks like. They're throwing stuff of this lady here, attacking her. Throwing chairs at her. One of them tries to kick her. It's her foot caught in her dress and falls.

Yeah, that is where we are. And with all this happening, you have Jonathan Pollard bragging about, threatening the United States and blackmailing the United States. And he says, you know, we've got this tradition in Western society. that we don't use nuclear weapons. I think that's wrong. We need to be able to use nuclear weapons against people because they're filled with hate. And you know, it's interesting that there's this, whenever you criticize their politics, or you criticize their policies, or you criticize their wars,

they call that racist. Well, maybe that's true because it is a government that is built on race, and if you're not that race, they come after you. We don't have a term like that for hatred of Christians because Christianity is absolutely not based on race. And that's what the people who are the Judaizers who are pushing this Judeo-Christian theology that is out there, that's what they don't get. That Christianity is not about race. It erased all of the racial divisions that are out there. But here's Jonathan Pollard, talking about how they control the United States already. During the Biden administration, we were just about to go into. Lebanon.

Chisbullah finally came in and was bombarding us. Seventh day or the tenths day? Yeah, it was like almost two weeks after the war in Azas started. Okay. Okay. And the Biden administration made it very clear that we were only to go in partially. And even then for a very short period of time. And most of us understood that this was an opportunity that we had to finish

off Chiswara. Okay. And we blinked, as they say. We blinked. So when I discussed this matter with certain people in the Prime Minister's office and in the Kiria, I reminded them of something that during the 73 war, when Kissinger stopped the aerial supply of Israel, our government, and I have to say this for legal reasons, allegedly, parked an aircraft at Telnoff Bay. He loves to brag about this. A-4 Skyhawk, with two unconventional weapons under its wings. Nuclear bombs.

And we told the Americans to fly their satellites over at a certain time and to take a look at that airplane. And the next day, the airlift commenced. Yeah, but I'm not sure you can do the same with Donald Trump. I think you will overreact. No, no, we're dealing with Biden. Ah, okay, we're still open. And so I was asked the people on, every time I mentioned this story,

it looked at me in horror. And they said, you won't, you, you would do this again. And I said, I don't view nuclear weapons as something that is that bad. It's because of my training. I was trained basically as a Soviet general staff officer. I wasn't trained as a Soviet general staff officer. I wasn't trained as an American staff officer. What does it mean?

It means that my understanding of weapon systems and how they're to be used is fundamentally different from a Western view of how these weapons are to be used. What's the difference? The difference is for the United States and the West, nuclear weapons at any level, tactical, strategic EMPs, whatever, are viewed as something that should only be used as a last resort. and even then very carefully on an escalation ladder, as they say. With me, I don't care if you start throwing nukes immediately, responsibly, but immediately, and a case that I've been pushing, is the use of an electromagnetic pulse weapon or weapons against Iran. I've been saying we should responsibly nuke Iran.

Exactly. This guy is a traitor. How is this dual citizenship stuff working out for you? Here's another dual citizen traitor to the United States. Mark Levin. President Trump has done more to confront this grave threat to humanity than any other president. He and Benjamin Netanyahu have put their political careers on the line,

have put their governments on the line. They've tanked them with the population. They've done more than anybody in the last half century to try and confront this, this Islamist revolution, to ensure that they don't get nuclear weapons, at least not on their watch and hopefully beyond. Maybe we should be more concerned about Israelis who like to use nuclear weapons. To prevent this terrorist regime from destroying millions of us, Benjamin Netanyahu has put his prime ministership on the line

because the people running who want to be prime minister are now attacking him for a variety of reasons. And these opponents, these myriad of forerner, deucous, duplicitous, exploitive, political and ideological opponents who would put our nation and the free world at risk of annihilation, even if it meant political advantage and electoral victories for them, are truly detestable. It's one thing to have a loyal opposition. It's another thing to have a disloyal opposition. President Trump is an extreme... Yeah, let's talk about where your loyalty actually lies, Levin. And so if you are somebody who does

want to use nuclear weapons on your enemies, you know, then you're the problem. It's not these Jews who want to nuke everybody, or these traitors like Jonathan Pollard or traitors like Mark Levin. You know, he calls his program Levin, life and liberty, or life liberty and Levin, is what he calls it, right? Actually, it should be life, liberty, or Levin, right? You can have life and liberty, or you can have Mark Levin and his Zionist policies. They want to kill everybody. You have former Colonel McGregor talked about this dual citizenship problem. To which country is your allegiance? So starting with you,

the United States or Russia? Fortunately, the United States. What about you? America all the way. What about you? Israel or the United States? Israel. I have dual citizenship. How are you here? You are held? I'm 28.

28. Of your 28 years, how much of that time has been spent in the United States? 26 and a half. And just so can you explain why you pick Israel over the United States? My family's there. If your allegiance is to Israel, why don't you live there? Why do you live here? Yeah.

Ask Mark Levitt. So you want to reap the benefits of the United States, but you won't back them. So what's the problem with living in Israel? There's no problem. I'm just... Then why don't you live there? It's a choice. If you're going to side with Israel in conflict with America, then why would you live in America?

It is kind of interesting when... citizens of the United States who have lived here for most of their life have an allegiance that supersedes their allegiance to the United States. It's racist. I'm proud of where I'm from and I don't hide it. Are you proud of being also an American though? I mean, there... Sounds like a no.

It's a hard question. It's not a hard question. And of course, it's the same question that Trump talked about, Miriam Adelson. Yeah, she loves Israel. I think she loves Israel more and she loves the United States. Do you want to answer? Oh, no, I don't want to answer that. Yeah, because we know the answer to that.

And then, of course, there's people like Mike Huckabee, who may have been born an American, who may not be racially have any connection to the Jews. And yet he considers himself as a Christian Zionist. And you're absolutely right, Mark. Mark Young 12 says the term Christian Zionism. is an oxymoron. If you understand who Jesus is, the Lamb of God, who ended the sacrificial system and made the Jewish temple obsolete, and with the Jewish temple gone, they haven't practiced

Judaism as delivered by Moses for 2,000 years. But here's Tucker talking to Huckabee. Listen to the double speak from Mike Huckabee. How much does it matter what Americans think? Well, it matters every bit what Americans think. That's why Americans vote. It's why Americans vote. It's why Americans have the opportunity to have free speech. We want him to have that. Okay, so what percentage of Americans support a war with Iran? I don't know. Do you know? I do it. I think it's run.

He doesn't care. I saw the numbers yesterday. I think it was like 21%. Okay. Is that enough to have a war with Iran? We don't live in a world where you have a poll taken to find out whether our policy should be a particular direction. I thought you just said that we vote.

No, we care deeply about it. the other hand, do we make the decisions of foreign policy and even domestic policy based on what the latest poll number is? How, if we're ignoring it, then in what sense do we, quote, care deeply about it? Well, I think we care deeply when we see there's a threat. No, but about Americans' opinions. So you've got 350 million Americans. They vote.

They voted in this last election on the basis in part of the promise no moral wars. So now we're about to have a war looks like. 80% of people are against it. in that range, let's say 70%, but nowhere near majority support for this war. And it's not direct democracy, but it is a form of democracy. It's representative democracy. The ultimate form of democracy in our system, in a republic, because we're not a true democracy. We're a republic.

It's a mediated democracy. It'll be an opportunity for Americans to vote if they think that we've made the wrong policy decisions. I personally think the president is making the right policy decision. But I guess, but you just said it matters deeply what Americans think. And if the overall majority are against it, in what sense of... Yeah, you get the idea that double speak. And the bottom line is that they don't even bother with the elected representative. Oh, we don't have a direct democracy.

We have a republic. You didn't even follow the Constitution and have a debate as to what this would look like, what the goals are. Why we are getting involved in the war and what the end of this looks like. Well, retired Colonel McGregor talks about the problem of dual citizenship. The price increases coming to your grocery store in the months ahead. will not announce themselves politely. They will arrive quietly and mercilessly in your heating or air conditioning bill,

in your shopping cart, on your family's table. And the same men and women who pushed us into this war with Iran and the war in Ukraine will be on television explaining to you why it was worth it. I'm here to tell you that's not true. This brings me to the most important question in American politics today. Who is governing this country?

country. For whom are they governing the United States? Our founders asked this question before we gained independence. They answered it in a language so clear, so unambiguous, that two and a half centuries have not diminished a single word. The government of the United States derives its authority and power from the consent of the governed, not from foreign courts, not from foreign treasuries, not from foreign governments. For the American, American people, and only from the American people, that principle is not partisan. It is not controversial. It is the foundational premise of everything our republic stands for.

And today, it is being violated systematically, openly, and with almost complete impunity. Let me ask you something that your elected officials will never ask on camera. Did you know that at least 75 countries around the world, a conservative count by any measure, prohibit dual citizens from holding elected office appointed positions or any significant role in government, at least 75 nations, and I want you to hear this list carefully. It's partial, but this list is not a list of rogue states or fringe governments. Germany, Japan, India, Mexico, South Korea, Norway, Singapore, Austria, the Netherlands, Israel, the Czech Republic.

every culture, every form of democratic governance, some of our closest and longest standing allies, and every single one of them arrived at the same fundamental conclusion, through their own history, their own heart experience, their own democratic wisdom. The person who governs must be undivided in his or her allegiance to the people they govern, not half loyal, not conditionally loyal, undivided. But I want to draw your your attention to one country on the list. One country whose inclusion in this list is not merely important, it is definitive. That country is Israel. That is correct. Under Israel's own basic law, the foundational legal framework of the Israeli state, any member elected to the Knesset,

Israel's parliament who holds foreign citizenship, must renounce that citizenship before taking office. Anyone with dual citizenship should be prohibited from holding federal appointed or elected office or any role in the U.S. government inside the United States. The American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, known as APAC, and its wealthy supporters spend hundreds of millions of dollars to influence or control foreign policy objectives. Yet Israelis hold their own government to a standard of undivided national loyalty. Let that sink in for a moment. The standard for which I am advocating today,

the standard that Washington, Jefferson, and Madison strongly supported is not only the American standard, it is also the German standard, the Japanese standard, the Indian and the Norwegian standards. It is Israel's own standard. Isn't that interesting? It's Israel's own standard. And, of course, you point out during the break here, Lance,

that Jonathan Pollard would have an issue in Israel's own standard. Israel holding elected office, wouldn't he? And yet he's running for elected office. I'm sure he has renounced his American citizenship in the most certain terms because he is one of the, if not the, biggest traitor to America ever, Jonathan Pollard. A guy celebrated by Mike Huckabee, celebrated by Bibi Netanyahu, a guy who was flown back to Israel by Miriam Adelson. These people are enemies of America.

And we talk about dual citizenship. I mean, it disgusts me to see a congressman, and we've seen this, parade around in Congress, wearing an IDF uniform. It's like, where do your loyalties lie? It truly is amazing. And the result of all this is the fact that we have Congress and Trump, Trump, who said, well, Congress used to be owned by Israel, and rightfully so. But I can do a better job.

You're just not getting your money's worth. you need to own me. And so he prostituted himself to Israel. And I thought it was interesting. I'm Marty had a great idea for a cartoon yesterday. And he put Trump in an Elvis suit standing in front of the Strait of Hormuz, the caption, Caught in a Trap, you know, the Elvis song. And I thought, oh, yeah, we need to run with that.

So we're going to play that out as we take a break as we end the program. I saw Marty's Elvis. Elvis, Trump, and I thought, well, you know, with all the stuff coming up, since Trump has had all the acts cancel on him for his big party, he's going to throw around the 4th of July. And he was saying, you know, I draw bigger crowds than Elvis. Well, maybe he'll sing for us. And I would assume that maybe he could get Benjamin Netanyahu and he could sing to him that they're caught in a trap. We're caught in a trap. I can't walk around.

He's got the moves, doesn't he? Why can't you see? What you're doing to me? When you don't believe, we're suspicious Yeah, I'm going to trap, baby. No, just change it to BB. Yeah, hat tip to I'm Marty. That was a great idea.

And that's it for our show today. Thank you so much for joining us. Have a good day. The Common Man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.

But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidnight Show.com. Thank you.