The David Knight Show - Mon Episode #2360: The War on Americans Who Question AI

Episode Date: September 28, 2026

────────────────────────────────────────[00:00:37] Trump Brands AI and Flock Camera Critics Traitors While Bowing to XiFusion centers, the FBI and DHS now push the line that opposing surveillance means working for China.────────────────────────────────────────[00:09:19] US Gave Away Its Rare-Earth Monopoly to a Firm Tied to Xi's FamilyGM sold off the mine and tech; a Chinese shell company majority-owned by Xi's relatives got it.────────────────────────────────────────[00:54:28] Local Officials Sign Secret NDAs to Sneak In Flock CamerasKnoxville split purchases under $20K each to dodge public approval entirely.────────────────────────────────────────[00:58:41] It's Not a "Data Center," It's a Hyperscale Surveillance Center71% of Americans oppose one nearby; DOJ calls a Memphis NAACP suit over Musk's xAI a security threat.────────────────────────────────────────[01:09:11] DHS Fusion Centers Now Monitor Anti-Surveillance Activists Like Sparrow MapSame playbook once flagged Ron Paul bumper-sticker owners as armed "sovereign citizens."────────────────────────────────────────[01:21:11] "Anti-Surveillance Extremism" Label Traced to a Zionist Intelligence GroupThe term was coined by MEMRI, co-founded by a former Mossad agent.────────────────────────────────────────[01:26:56] Senate Hearing: Flock Cameras Can Search by People's Faces, Not Just PlatesHawley reveals the network logs bumper stickers, dents, and scans who's riding inside.────────────────────────────────────────[01:34:36] Epstein's Accountant Contradicts Himself Three Times on Trump Rape-Accuser PayoutUnder oath, he admits, then denies, then "can't confirm or deny" a Jane Doe 4 settlement.────────────────────────────────────────[01:44:35] ICE Buys $20M in Shock Gloves and AI-Integrated Robot DogsBorder Patrol's warrantless "constitution-free zone" already covers two-thirds of Americans.────────────────────────────────────────[01:50:16] Flock Won't Testify, So the Internet Doxxes the CEO's House on Google MapsMeanwhile Maine tells a lobsterman to wear a 24/7 GPS tracker or lose his license. ──────────────────────────────────────── Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code “KNIGHT” For high quality made in America products go to HomeSteadProducts.shop and use promo code “Knight” for 10% off your purchases Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

in a world of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 28th of September, year of our Lord, 26. Well, we saw at the end of the week last week, Trump cowtowing to China's, whatever his title is, Xi.

And while he was cowtowing to him, Trump is also pushing out through, fusion centers, the FBI and Homeland Security, the idea that anybody who opposes his artificial intelligence surveillance state with flock and the so-called data centers, anybody who opposes that is a traitor, treasonous, working for China. We're going to talk about who the real treasonous character is and all this, the dark heart of Donald Trump as seen in the Burgeoning. police state that he's putting in. And folks, there is a reason why he is using the border and

immigration as the beard for rolling out his federal police state. We'll be right back. Well, it was the first time in 11 years that she has been to the U.S. I'll always want to talk about this. It always sounds like we're playing pronoun games here. but before she there was who was who was on first i don't know it was on second but so there was a lot of pandering to she by donald trump and all i got out of it was two pandas i'm going to be sent to the alina zoo uh but trump was uh talking before he became president you know when he was running he said a lot of things that basically define what a standard democrat Republican president has been and the things that are wrong with them. And of course, he was very

clear about pointing out what was wrong with them. But then when he comes in, he does exactly what he was criticizing from the other people. Amazing how that works. We have the president of China come and we give him a state dinner. Now, when people is screwing you, you don't give him state dinners. Here he is today. I did more than a state dinner. We've had this conference. I'd get him a McDonald's hamburger. And what he's done is sucked off. all of our jobs. Melania and I are delighted to welcome you once again to the White House.

You are truly outstanding, amazing people. I wouldn't give a state dinner like we do for China and all these other people that rip us off. We're going to be these big state dinners. We shouldn't have dinners at all. We should be eating a hamburger on a conference table. You forget the state dinners. That costs, by the way, a fortune. Maybe crumble up some fortune cookies that Marsha Blackburn has.

Yeah, cost of fortune. The guy who was a fiscal hawk, right? No, now this Mafia Don is running the country like one of his failed casinos. So a tremendous visit from two spectacular people, he said. And before they could sit down, they were asked a question by reporter saying, did you talk to Xi about the weapons and the oil issues with, Iran? Neither one of them said anything. Both she and Trump just stared ahead and said nothing. The article from the Atlantic, I think, really captured, the headline captured what Trump is,

the deferential president. That is, as long as he's talking to an authoritarian leader, he really admires authoritarian leaders like Xi, like Putin, like Robert Duterte, from the Philippines. he admires Kim Jong-un. He likes all the bad guys. He admires that power and how they wield it. And, of course, that's not really anything new. We've always had presidents, we've had both Obama and George W. Bush saying, yeah, I wish I was a dictator. We also had Justin Trudeau in Canada.

I wish I was a dictator like China. I could just tell people what to do. Well, Trump tells people what to do, and he admires the dictators and does it openly. It's not just a wish. No, he wants to imitate them. And that is the issue, folks, with the surveillance stuff. But, of course, if you oppose the surveillance state, if you don't want to turn the U.S. into China, then you are a threat. We're going to talk about that in a moment.

So the reason they said deferential president was because Trump went to the plane and waited at the base of the stairs. at the red carpet, patiently waiting for she to present himself, which, again, sounds like a minor thing, but it is optics, and it is something that presidents typically don't do. You had a situation who abomited that for the Pope, but typically what happens is they wait at the White House and receive the person coming to the White House. That's basically what she did when you had back in just a few months ago when Trump went to China. So a remarkable act of deference,

says the Atlantic. By tradition, American presidents don't make the 12-mile trip to the base to greet a foreign leader. They instead waited the White House, backed by the grandeur and the power of the executive mansion, but not this time.

She did not display the same level of hospitality when Trump visited Beijing in May. So Trump's gesture suggested that it'll take a conciliatory role during the closely watched the summit between the leaders, and he did. Trump is not expected to push on core issues, including the pace of AI, the defense of Taiwan, and China's support for Iran in this war. But again, you did have a reporter who asked the question, and they refused either one

of them to acknowledge it. It was not that long ago when Trump, a self-styled international, bully could credibly claim to run the country and the world. Well, he did. He ran them both into the ground with his bankruptcy ideas. He's running the economies into the ground. He's running us into war. So his erratic behavior threats, his bluffs, his emphasis on making money has left the U.S.

and retreat from the rest of the world, writes Atlantic. And they're right. What did Trump's meeting with she actually accomplish? Well, he claimed they had a tremendous strides and that our farmers are going to be very, very happy. He said, well, you mean he's going to undo some of the damage that he put in place? You know, the farmers have been hurt by his tariffs in the first administration and now big time in the second administration. He promised to get them $12 billion. And now he's saying that's going to be there as well now on the table.

Meanwhile, they gave a direct subsidy to Argentina, six months before they gave any money to the farmers that they'd hurt. They gave a subsidy to Argentina of $20 million. And so they're putting together a private financial deal for another $20 billion. So $40 billion for Argentina, $12 billion when we get around to it for our farmers. The AI race has made Taiwan an even bigger price since they make about 90% of the world's most advanced chips. Yeah, see, I don't like China. I don't admire Chinese government, but they do have a plan. They are playing 5D chess.

We've got a guy who wouldn't recognize the chess board if he saw one. But they are making long-term plans. They're going to have, they've already got a monopoly on rare earth metals. And there was absolutely no reasons I pointed out before for them to have that monopoly, except that we gave it to them. It was American companies that developed the technology to make the rare earth magnets. And so we had the technology. We had the biggest mine that was producing that anywhere in the country.

It was a subsidiary of GM. And when they got into trouble because of the lousy cars they were making, they sold off that subsidiary. And the federal government, even though it was something that was vital to the defense industry, they allowed a shell corporation where 60% of it was owned by she's son-in-laws or sons. And so that Chinese company got the process. And then we closed down the mine because it was very dirty in terms of radioactive waste from thorium. Rather than modifying it and making it more expensive to capture that, they just shut it down. The Chinese don't have any such concern.

They don't care if they dump thorium on their own people. That's the kind of government that they have. That's the kind of government that Trump wants to have here. It only matters what is in it for him. And just like China, the Trump administration, make sure that if you want to do business, you've got to let them have a little bit of, what they call it with the mafia.

I've got to wet my beak, right? I've got to get a little bit of a cut here. And so it is that kind of mafioso, fascist criminal government, corrupt government that China has that Trump is so envious of and wants to replicate here. But he didn't need to shut down the Chinese at the border without having first secured an alternate source here in America. We had the technology to start with.

We still have the mine that is there. he could have done something to open that up, but instead he foolishly cuts off access to the rare earth minerals because of his tariff policies. And this is typical. It's the same type of thing that he did with Iran and the Strait of Hormuz. And so the only tangible thing that seems to come out of this, at this point in time, from all of this pandering,

is China is going to send two giant pandas, ping, ping, and fu shang. to the zoo in Atlanta. I've just got to say, if an American were to name a panda ping-phing, they would be called racist. Everybody would be excoriating them. Well, I guess somebody wanted to name it poo,

but you know how that worked out with Xi Jinping. He was so upset because somebody, when Obama went to visit him, people were laughing because Obama was tall and thin. And in contrast, she looked kind of short and dumpy, so they put up by picture. of Winnie the Pooh and Tigger walking side by side.

And that got people in a lot of trouble in China because they have a surveillance state. They carefully police what you have to say exactly like Trump desires to do here. And if you make fun of Xi, just like if you make fun of Trump, he wants to make sure there's going to be penalties involved. And there were for a she. So he put up Winnie the Pooh referring to Xi Jinping. you're in trouble in China. But when we talk about how we're being used by China,

take a look at this article here. Saipan, the tiny island where Chinese mothers travel to give birth to American babies. It's been a territory since 1983. I've played a big role in World War II, and they had it as a strategic area, but they made it a territory. And under the ridiculous rules of birth,

right citizenship. If you have a baby on Saipan, that baby becomes an American citizen. So guess what? You have a massive number of pregnant Chinese women going to Saipan to have their baby and to secure American citizenship as well as Chinese citizenship. This is the ludicracy, the extreme ludicracy of what they call birthright citizenship, what we call anchor babies. And should be called anchor babies. The idea being that once the baby turns 18, they can, this is our American citizen, they can sponsor you, the mother, and you can come to America and get on the welfare rolls. So this is about, really.

And so these people obviously are not subject to the jurisdiction, the United States. And that is what being a natural-born citizen means, actually. They're not even in America. They're in Saipan. It's a territory. It's not a state. So this story here from the Telegraph talks about a woman who is called in to the main

hospital to translate. She speaks both Chinese and English. And so this pregnant woman goes to the hospital. She's got a lot of money with her in the bag. She says, I'll pay for everything. but she comes in and translates for it. She does that several times. She says she will not accept payment for the translation because she thinks it's illegal.

It should be illegal. But of course we have the Supreme Court, which doesn't care what the Constitution says. It doesn't care what common sense is either. Dual citizenship, folks, is not working. Look at the divided loyalty that we get from people like Rashida-Talib, divided loyalty to the Palestinians. or people like, what is the guy's name that wore the IDF uniform? He's a congressman.

He's got divided loyalty. I come up with a long list of people divide loyalty to Israel. We've got all these people with divided loyalty. And you know, you can only serve one master, right? Christ is right about that. And this dual citizenship is not working for us. They have a divided loyalty, and they're coming for four. financial dividends. What can they get out of the United States? And we see this over and over again.

You know, I got people out there saying, you know, worried about the Muslims coming into Texas and setting up their own communities. And they should be concerned about that. They have a movement pushing back against that. Don't Sharia my Texas. I agree with that. But why not pay attention to don't knowahide my America either, right? I don't want Zionists to take over this country. any more than I want Muslims to take over this country. They're all looking at how they can loot us and, you know, kill America and feed on the carcass. That's what they're looking for. They're looking to control us.

The thing is, you can, I've had conversations with, you know, the next generation, you know, their parents came here. You know, before I met my wife, you know, I was meeting other people. And many of them, because we were in Texas, were from Mexico or some, you know, central, South American country. And literally all of them, you know, we talk about like, well, why'd your parents come here? Oh, you know, better economy. Yeah. But it never ends there, you know, just like Rashida Taleb, right? She flies her flag when she gets elected to Congress and this, Brian Mast is his name.

Brian Mast wears his IDF uniform and parades through the halls of Congress. Here's the Birmingham City Council. Take a look at the people there, the demographics. And then you understand why the Birmingham City Council bans the national flags, right? And I think that is Birmingham, England, not Alabama. I have heard in Birmingham they love the governor, but that's about all I know. Yeah, I can sing that tune there, I guess. That's the reality, folks.

And when we look at what the Israelis want to do, they start out by banning free speech. And then by calling anybody who criticizes their genocide a racist, saying that they not only want to ban free speech, but they want to ban you and cancel you. Make sure you don't have a job. Make sure that you can't travel. And they brag about it. They say, well, if you say that Jews are doing this, you're just putting out an anti-Semitic trope. No, your Jewish organizations are bragging about it and saying, more of it needs to be done. Just take a look at Markle of Van.

Well, yeah, we banned Pat Buchanan. because why? Because he didn't want to give foreign aid to all countries. Stop foreign aid to all countries. Oh, no, he's anti-Semitic. So this is where we are, but it goes beyond that. In the worst case, when you look at what Muslim communities want to set up with Sharia law, and of course the Israelis have their own version of that, the Noahide laws. And it looks on first glance, it looks, oh, there's nothing unusual about that. idolatry, blasphemy, murder, sexual immorality, theft, eating flesh torn from a living animal, establishing courts of justice. Okay, so there's your Sharia law, but a Jewish version of that, a Zionist version of that. And then we start to look at the first two, as a matter of fact, idolatry and blasphemy. Well, I guess that is a religious freedom issue. Who defines what idolatry is?

Well, they define it, and they've made it very clear that worshiping the Lord Jesus Christ is in their view idolatry, and it should be punishable by death. And I've played for you videos of people who are in Israel, and the person says, you're an idolater. I should be killing you to a Christian. And he says, so why don't you?

And he said, well, we're waiting until we get the Sanhedron back. the people who killed Jesus. And if you really want to know what the Noahide laws are about, punishment for worshipping Jesus under Noahide law is death by beheading. According to the Talmud, specifically Sanhedron 57A, idolatry includes worship of Jesus, punishable by decapitation. The Noahide laws, which Jews believe will govern all non-Jews in their messianic age, Their golden age, right?

Which I think is what Trump is referring to. When he talks about his golden age, I don't think he's talking about all the gold plating that he's putting on everything. That includes prohibition against idolatry and blasphemy in this context. Recognizing Jesus as divine or worshipping him would be considered a violation of these laws. Under Jewish laws described in the Talmud and other texts, such violations are capital offenses subject to execution by sort of. Beheading, which is considered to be a merciful form of death compared to burning or stoning. So there you go. They have a merciful plan for us in mind. Yeah, we have all these different groups who seek to kill Western civilization, especially

the United States, and to feed off the carcass. We should not be naive about that. But again, it's the system that we want to look at. And the system is the danger in all that, as opposed to individuals who are there. In August 6th, the U.S. President signed an executive order proclaiming that he intended to end birth tourism. Well, really? Is he really serious about this? Seems like he can do pretty much anything he wants. he's said as much as a matter of fact

when he was opposed on some of his buildings he said, I am the code. I am the law. And he doesn't want or need and he won't stop the wars because he doesn't want or need permission from Congress according to the Constitution either. And yet when it comes to some of these things, he's very deferential,

not just to she but to the court system as well. Other things he just does as he pleases. And so to show how serious he was, he had Rubio's State Department saying, under Secretary Rubio's leadership, the Department of State is taking action around the world to stop this abuse, to dismantle birth tourism networks, and to hold accountable those who try to scam our system, they said. Well, look no further than the head of the State Department, Marco Rubio, if you want to see somebody who scammed the system.

Marco Rubio is himself an anchor baby. I pointed this out when he ran for president. He was not qualified. He was born in America. And so what he said is, he said, we've got to, just because you're born in the U.S. doesn't make you a citizen. Your parents have to be U.S. citizens, except his parents were not U.S. citizens for four years after he was born. So he is a birthright citizen, an anchor baby himself.

And this is the guy we've got who's going, that Trump has put in, to stop birthright citizenship. Do you understand the fraud involved in all of this? And he's not qualifying to run for president, folks. He can run for Senate. He is not qualified to run for president. Well, it's once considered to be a useful U.S. outpost in the East has now become a potential point of risk thanks to their visa regulations, which are very different. As a matter of fact, Guam is there, same kind of situation, except they have a different visa situations. Basically,

no visa requirements to go to Saipan, so the Chinese birth tourists can freely go there. Have the baby, and according to our absurd laws and our absurd interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which was meant to clarify the citizenship status of the newly freed slaves. That's the context, and within it, the text says, the parents have to be subject to the jurisdiction in the United States. That is clearly not the case here. There are suggestions the same practices could be happening on the nearby island of Guam, except the stricter visa rules make it a little bit more difficult.

They even cater to this openly. They have a local, supermarket, which is called twins. And they have signs up a giant baby store outlet. And they have dwarfs all the other businesses around there. I guess it's like citizens are us. But it's USA Mom and Baby is the name of that store, just in case you don't know what's going on with it. During COVID-19, pregnant women walked around freely on Saipan. They would frequently see women going to shops and there by High Street and enjoying the beach and so forth. If you looked at this and passed by for two minutes, said one person, you would see another pregnant woman and you think, wow, everybody is having a baby this year.

Well, no, these are all from China. But since COVID, birth tourism has gone underground following a visa cap of 14 days. So anybody can get a visa, but it's limited to 14. days, so they have ways around that. And everybody's just kind of passively, it's an open secret. They go along with all this. Like I said, the store,

the enormous baby store that dwarfs all the other restaurants and stores in the area. USA, mom, and baby. Department blocks on the island are rumored to become hotspots for secretive Chinese businesses, which bring women to the island where they stay for weeks at a time. So,

did he talk to Xi about this? No, as a matter of fact, when we get to the AI police surveillance state, we're going to talk about how useful it is for Trump to use the border issue as a wedge issue to get people to accept the idea of a federal police force. Federalizing the police. Remember going back to the middle of the 20th century, the John Birch Society warned people about this. They had the support your local sheriff campaign. they want to keep law enforcement local, not centralized, not federalized. Trump is doing it. He's using the border issue to do this in the same way that other Republicans like DeSantis

want to have mandatory e-verify. They want to have digital ID to do everything because we've got to worry about the people coming in from foreign countries over the border that they have. should say the pretended border that is there. But they want to create that problem and then use it for the police state solution they have. So again, bring the kid in, waiting until they turn 18, then they can sponsor you to be an American citizen and get on welfare. You have to ask yourself, why they would continue this and why they would continue welfare payments. You know, when you look at what happened with the Somalians in Minnesota, the Trump administration doubled the amount of money for the refugee program.

Rather than cutting the cash off, they're doubling it. Do you think they've got an agenda here? It gives them a perfect excuse when he refuses to do anything at all about it. It was known. I reported on it in his first administration. Everybody knew about it. Everybody was talking about it except for Trump. And then when Nick Shirley did an investigation more recently within last year, that made it a, it went viral and that made it a topic everybody was talking about.

So they had to pretend to do something. Have they done anything about it? No, not really. You don't need to have an army of police agents there. You just lock these people up, Al Capone style, right? The financial crimes that are there. but instead what they're doing is paving the way for more of this. Meanwhile, you have, as we're looking at the competition over artificial intelligence,

Peter Thiel talks about AI and the threat from China, again, just like Marshall Blackburn. She's got the talking points down, even if she doesn't make a very convincing case for it. She does her little commercial setting in a Chinese restaurant, crumbling Chinese fortune cookies and saying, shiny, shiny, shiny, shine. Yeah, she's going to make a fortune. All these politicians are off of AI, and they're going to enslave us in a prison planet. But Peter Thiel, and this is kind of interesting. This is a take on it from Christopher Hale, who has a website, the letter from Leo.

He's all about the Pope, and he had a very interesting take on this. I'll play you the clip, and then we're going to take a quick break. In theory, you could slow it down if you had genuine, you know, deep cooperation across the whole world. And then I, but I think that would require like a, you know, one world government with real teeth, real force. And the sort of classical, liberal part of me thinks that's almost, you know, that's a frying pan into fire. It's a cure that's worse than the disease. And then, of course, you can have fake global government where government, where we have a lot of conference. to discuss a lot of, you know, a lot of, you know, somewhat empty statements that get put out.

And then there's also, of course, a risk that it ends up being slowed down in the West and, you know, not in China. You know, the Pope recently issued this AI encyclical or, you know, I would characterize it as an anti-AI encyclical. And, and again, this is, you know, maybe it was too harsh, but the rhetorical point I have on it is, is that the people, you know, the Communist Party of China is not going to listen to the Pope. There's a chance people in the U.S. will. And so, in effect, the Pope's encyclical was working for the Communist Party. I'm not saying he was an agent of the communists, but he was at least acting as a useful idiot for the CCP.

So even a Pope is in on this conspiracy. And it's much bigger than that. We've got Donald Trump and Homeland Security looking at everybody who criticizes. data centers, artificial intelligence. We'll be right back. Loyalty to the government, when it deserves it. It's the David Knight Show. And it doesn't look like they deserve it much at this point in time, does it?

Well, again, this is Peter Thiel, and this is the take from a guy who's got a website that's all about Pope Leo. Yeah, he is a papist. And for him, it's all about the Pope. And I got to say, I know a lot of traditional Catholics who don't like the last several popes that we've had. And they are a bit more traditional, I think. But this guy, for him, that was the entire thing. What he did is he buried the lead, the lead really being what Peter Thiel was talking about in terms of world government. Again, to recap what he said, he said, the Communist Party of China is not going to listen to the Pope.

There's a chance of people in the U.S. will. and so, in effect, the Pope's encyclical, was working for the Chinese Communist Party. You see, that is the logic that is being repeated, not just by Peter Thiel. That's being put out there by Donald Trump. It's being put out there by the Pentagon. It's being put out there by Homeland Security.

They've all picked up this line of accusation saying that if you are against a surveillance state, well, then we need to surveil you, right? if you are against the people who are betraying us to Israel, well, then the traitors who have sold us out are going to start watching you as well. He said, I'm not saying he's an agent of the communist, but he was at least acting as a useful idiot for the CCP.

Again, I guess he doesn't think the Pope is working for the communists, but he does think that everybody should be working for him, and directly at least, you know, giving him money for his artificial intelligence. Here's the thing, folks. He's worried about over-regulation of AI. I am as well. I'm worried that what they're going to do out of this fear campaign

that's being put out there by the major AI companies right now. They've been doing this for a long time. It didn't just happen with the supposedly AI agents that got out of the sandbox and started hacking other companies. No, they've been talking about this for a very long time. Remember we had in the past, We had Sam Altman go before Congress and say, this is really dangerous. You know, it could kill everybody.

And so he and Google and Zuckerberg were all there saying, please, you know, we can't control this thing. It's out of our control. They're the ones to continue to develop it. But no, what they need is they need the government to come in with regulations because they just can't control themselves. And so what they're really begging for is for the government to give them a cartel, a monothe. They want to make sure that nobody else has access to these tools. They're not just worried about the Chinese. They're worried about domestic competitors as well.

And they don't want you to have the same kind of tools that they have. Because you might use it to find out stuff about them. As a matter of fact, the same thing is happening now with the networks of cameras. We've got flock cameras. Now, in the last couple of months, it's gone from 120,000 to over 144,000. Everywhere. Connected to a network. And yet one person comes out and says, we're going to have something called it Sparone.

And with Sparonell, we're going to have, that's just going to be an informal network of people taking pictures and reporting locations of police cars, of ice, for example. And they freak out about that. Just a few people taking pictures of them and they freak out about it. Well, they've got 144,000 cameras where they're watching everybody all the time. and collating and recording the data as well. And so this is the dual standard. And they're now pulling the national security card.

So caution about artificial intelligence, Teal's theory about the antichrist. He says it'll arrive as a regulator who is promising safety. Well, regulators always do promise safety, don't they? And they always promise that they'll give it to you. give up your liberty and your privacy and your freedom. You never get the safety, but you do give up your liberty and your privacy and your freedom. And so when we look at this, Israel is pushing this kind of a mark of the beast permission

society as well. And if you want to know about the Antichrist, just take a look at Israel. I mean, they're openly Antichrist. They make it very clear what they're about. the Noahide laws and so forth. They're openly antichrist. It's one of the things I could never understand about the dispensationalist. You know, the Christian Zionists were out there.

They got blinders on. You know, they're so focused on, well, the Antichrist, this and that. And here's the timing. Here's what has to happen before the Antichrist comes back. I think they're as comical as Peter Thiel, quite frankly. They don't know anything about the timing of this or what it's going to be. But that's what they major in. And yet they typically focus on Israel and make it an object of worship.

The very country and the very religion of Zionism that despises the Lord Jesus Christ. The Talmud and all the rest of this stuff, that is the scribes and the Pharisees folks that Christ condemned. And it is the Sanhedron and these types of structures that were the ones who came after him. and they will come after us as Christians as well if we give them the power to do this. And the Christian Zionists folks are some of the worst Magatards out there. The people who cannot look at a situation and put the most basic facts together, the fact that they can hold these mutually exclusive and contradictory ideas together, this Judeo-Christian idea, that is an oxymoron, if ever the was one.

There is no fellowship with people who want to kill you for worshiping the Lord Jesus Christ. The people who condemn him, who hate him more than any other religion. That is what modern Talmudic Judaism is about. Even the Muslims revere Christ. They don't believe that he was inside. They don't believe he died for their sins. But they don't despise him the way the modern Talmudic Judaism does. it's not even the Judaism of the Old Testament.

It's completely rejected that. It's its own thing. So this guy who has Leo's letters, the letters from Leo is the name of his sign. He's all upset because J.D. Vance didn't defend the Pope because J.D. Vance says he's Catholic. As a matter of fact, he says that Peter Thiel opened the door to his Catholic faith. He says, possibly the smartest person I ever met, Peter Thiel. The man who identified very openly as a Christian. Really?

Also is gay, but that's another story, I guess. It wasn't actually open. He got outed. He didn't openly identify as gay. He got outed. And then he got vindictive, and he funded the lawsuit against Gawker by Hulk Hogan. So Vance goes on and say, Peter's a very unorthodox Christian.

Yes, I would say so. unless you're somebody like Tolariko, in which case, that is what they define as orthodoxy. That is their religion, just like Zionism is a religion of many conservative Christians. This Christianity is much more interesting than the atheism of the people that I see surrounding me, he said. Well, again, this guy is all about all things pope. And that is not what most traditional Catholics. people call themselves traditional Catholics, very, very critical of the Pope and his agenda. And for a good reason, I think.

But when we look at what is happening with the police state, the feds are targeting AI critics as quote-unquote foreign agents. Yeah, the absurd Manchurian candidate aspect of all this stuff, the projection. And I've got to say, foreign agents. the people who are most vocal about this, people like Tom Cotton, are actually foreign agents of Israel. They have prostituted themselves to the Israelis and to Zionism. There's not anybody that is criticizing AI that wants to get us caught up in a war. As a matter of fact, we're concerned that AI may be used to provide plausible deniability for any kind of mass casualty event that they planned.

That's the reality that is there. So you have a bipartisan rejection of the police state amongst the people, and yet there's nothing but a bunch of headfakes from our elected leaders in terms of stopping this. It isn't something, first of, before you even call for more regulation, which, again, is about protecting their little cartel. It's about the big guys protecting their established position. But before you put in regulation to protect the big guys, that's what it'll do, how about not giving them the money? It's the federal government that is funding this.

If they didn't subsidize it, that would, well, that would collapse the economy right there because we've got the economy that is hanging by a thread. The sort of Damocles is this AI bubble. If they stopped funding this monster that they've created, then that's what's going, that bubble is definitely going to burst. But the federal government has created this AI monster. And now they want to use the monster that is roaming around us as an excuse to come after us if we criticize that. Now, these are people, by the way, who if you want to talk about somebody who's betrayed us to China, it's not so much they've betrayed us to China.

They betrayed us like China. They want a Chinese police surveillance state, a permission society, the Traffic Light Society. I reported years ago when the Chinese got their biometric identification program and they rolled it out. And this is even before, this is during the first Trump administration, this is before they rolled out the traffic light system on us for the COVID pandemic. because that was also about pushing us into this police state, folks, just like immigration was. And at the time, when they first got their biometric capability and got their database set up, they would look at people on the street, and they would identify them, and immediately they would be denied access to certain places.

That's how they used it. That's how these people want to use it as well. And it's how the art elects, I think we should start calling these people. the art of the proponents of AI. And a little notice remarks by Trump and the Justice Department, the administration declared war on protesters and opponents of AI threatening criminal liability. If you further the propaganda or other goals of a foreign power. Too bad you can't do that with Israel.

As a matter of fact, we know they're doing that for Israel. This is a conspiracy theory by Trump and the AI support. orders saying that just like you heard Peter Thiel. Well, if you do something to stop AI here, you are actually helping China. No, Trump goes further. He says you were consciously being funded or being or being helped by the Chinese government. Last week, the Justice Department instructed citizens and non-citizens that anyone furthering the goals of a foreign power in any public activity, including even public demonstrations, must formally notify the government to avoid arrest and prosecution. Again, what about the foreign government that has dragged us into war?

What about the foreign government that demands to punish you for demonstrating? Demands to ban your free speech. Demands to cancel you. No, we're not talking about that government. Two days prior, Trump began a spate of social post declaring the opposition to AI as traitorous and treasonous. He said there is a sick conspiracy going on among AI and data centers going on against it, rather. It is going on with him, actually. And the only one that is happy about it is China. Conspiracy theorists, treasonous, traitors, leakers, beware. So you see, he's not ever lying.

Anybody that tells the truth or asks a probing question of him is fake news and they have to be punished. And, of course, he's not selling us out to a foreign country, is he? He's not selling us out to Israel. But if you oppose his police state, then he's got a conspiracy theory for you. And he will call you a conspiracy theorist. The people that say, yeah, yeah, yeah, is going to destroy the world, but data centers are bad for your neighborhood, are revolutionaries. But they're revolutionaries for a bad and an evil cause. See, everything that Trump says and does is not only a lie.

but it's also an inversion, a perversion of reality, as a matter of fact. Does he ever talk about good and evil? Well, you know, Peter Thiel did talk about good and evil. You know, it's something interesting to say about how he defines good and evil. Listen to this. If you're evil, you're at least competent. And if you're evil, you're not bad. And therefore, maybe you're actually kind of good,

because you're at least getting something done. So evil is good. Beware people who call good evil and evil good. As a matter of fact, that is, I think, perhaps the most shallow, stupid situational ethics I've ever seen in my life. His situational ethics is based on, well, if you're competent, if you're good at what you're doing. Well, you know, you had the Bolsheviks and the Maoists were pretty good at killing their

opponents. So I guess they weren't evil. It's not evil to kill tens of millions of people, is it? How do you, he does have a very unorthodox view of Christianity, doesn't he? If he calls himself a Christian, he says something like that. He doesn't have a standard for good and evil. We do. It's called the Bible.

But he's got his own situational definition of good and evil. I mean, you know, if you're evil, if you're really good at it, like Dr. Evil, you're not evil. It's all about competence, isn't it? We will also be looking... Yeah, he was terrible, but, you know, at least he was extraordinarily efficient about it. That's right, that's right. You made the trains run on time. How about that?

We will also be looking for bad, said Trump, and we can do that very easily. Well, they're already existing criminal and civil justice system. Yeah, see, he already has the tools of Big Brother. They're already using these tools for surveillance. And they've been doing that since Israel did 9-11. and they've got predictive intelligence, anticipatory intelligence, that original AI, predicting what you're going to do, pre-crime and all the rest of this stuff. Yeah, they have the tools of Big Brother already, but they're rapidly looking to put them on steroids and to make them much, much more dangerous. And it is predictable that you're always going to see the federal government fall back on national security.

whenever they want to justify something that is criminal, that is illegal. They'll say national security, national secrecy, right? In the same way that the Zionist will always play the race card, call people anti-Semitic, the federal government will call people a threat to national security. And so we're back to Tom Cotton, the guy who was wrong on everything, a senator from Arkansas on the Senate Intelligence Committee, he's a chairman of that. He and Todd Blanche had previously said they wanted to investigate, quote, foreign influence efforts targeting the buildout of American AI infrastructure.

So if you want to get in the way of them rolling out a surveillance infrastructure, you are a foreign spy. Say the people who want to spy on us. Say the people who are captive to a foreign government, Israel, people like Tom Cotton. So foreign actors led by the Chinese Communist Party attempting to manipulate U.S. policy and public opinion on data centers. It is comical, really, when you look at the Democrats,

want to blame everything on Russia, even if it's something that they are doing. The Republicans want to blame everything on China, just as they did with the pandemic. And the reality was that the bioweapon was us. The bioweapon was our jab that, that was there. So Cotton's chief exhibit was a guy named Neville Roy Singham,

Shanghai-based American tech mogul. And again, you'll notice that Soros is no longer the bad guy with a right anymore, right? When's the last time you saw the conservatives, especially the alternative mainstream media, go after Soros? They shut up about it, didn't they? Because Scott Besant is Soros's right-hand man and partner and all this stuff. Now he's head of the Treasury Secretary. So stop with the criticism of George Soros.

Now we've got to find a new poster child out there to criticize. We can't allow, and I'm not saying Soros is a good guy. I'm just saying they went silent about this guy. He was still very evil. But I guess he's not evil because he's competent at the evil. We can't allow any effort by foreign adversaries to extort and undermine our technological development, wrote Tom Cotton. You won't cotton to it.

Days before his letter, top Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, led by Chairman Brett Guthrie, Republican, Kentucky, raised nearly identical concerns. They asked FBI director Cash Patel. And the White House were briefing

what they called foreign influence campaigns aimed at blocking American data centers. So there you go. If you don't want a data center, you are obviously a China agent, Russia, Russia, Russia, China, China, China, depending on which party is in power.

Also, I've just got to point out the irony of asking Cash Patel, that, you know, good old American name Cash Patel there, to investigate foreign influence. That's right. Where might one look? That's right. So Guthrie said, this is the Republican in the House, said the Chinese Communist Party and other foreign adversaries

may be attempting to influence decisions related to American data center infrastructure. You think? As I said before, they don't pay any attention to Israel influencing us into a war. But the reality is that Israel is at the core at the center of pushing this artificial intelligence stuff. And I'll give you the connections here in just a second.

But the traders, folks, are the local officials, the people who are signing secret NDAAs with these big tech companies and doing this stuff illegally behind the backs of people, even behind the backs of other officials. Here in Knoxville, we had a situation as discovered by Glenn Jacobs,

who is the county mayor, but they had officials there who started buying these flock cameras under a program where they could spend, I think it was like $20,000 at a time without getting formal approval. And they structured the purpose. purchases to make sure that they were gradually accumulating these things, spending repeated

under $20,000 amounts to secretly buy this stuff without even telling other government officials. These people are traders. They're traders to all of us. Funding this money to these corporations who are paying them. That's typically what traders do it for. They do it for money. That's what Jonathan Pollard did it for. So they sign the NDA agreements.

They operate in secret and they betray the wishes of their communities, which are solidly against this. That's the other aspect of this. When you look at how, and I've said this from the very beginning, this is an issue that as far as the grassroots, the people of America are concerned, they're united. It doesn't, this is not a partisan issue. This is an issue that transcends partisanship. And yet the GOP has foolishly decided that they are going to openly, openly side with what people don't want because of money. That's all that matters to them.

And so it is a conspiracy. That is a fact. It is a conspiracy against us. David Sachs, who is the venture capitalist who served as Trump's AI czar before stepping down to become co-chair of the president's. Council of Advisors on Science and Technology has been casting domestic resistance to AI as a gift to Beijing. Same way as Peter Thiel. That's the way they begin in it.

So they say, well, you know, you're actually helping China. And Trump says, they're consciously doing it. They're actually working as agents. Let's stick the FBI and Homeland Security on them. So he said, this is how you lose the AI race. He said, America is tying itself in knots with politicians and bureaucrats. Democrats banning new data centers. Not as much as the people want.

He said, let's just hand the whole ballgame to China. And then you got Kevin O'Leary, who was the Shark Tank investor. He had a $100 billion data center planned in Utah. He's also weaseled his way in with the Trump administration, giving lots of money to them, cozying up to them over the last couple of years, going to Marlago and all the rest of the required things. Who knows how much money he's given them. But this $100 billion data center, let's just think about it.

Because, you know, we throw these numbers around all the time. A billion here, a billion there pretty soon. It adds up to real money, right? As ever, Dixon said, well, $100 billion. I was just talking earlier about what was going on with China. He says, yeah, yeah, we're going to get a $16 billion deal with China. You know, for help the farmers, they're going to be so happy about this. That was what happened when they stopped buying.

soybeans for American farmers, $16 billion for all the American farmers. We're talking about $100 billion here. The amount of money that these people command is nothing short of astronomical. The love of money is the root of all evil, and it's one of the reasons why these people are so incredibly evil because of the amount of money. Just think about that. A hundred billion dollar data center, when China's as much as they like soy.

I was only going to be buying $16 billion worth of it from the United States. So Kevin O'Leary went further. He went more than just saying, well, you're passively helping the Chinese. Maybe you don't even realize it. No, no, no. To him, it's a conspiracy. Just like with Trump. He wants to cozy up to Trump because he wants that $100 billion data center there.

So he came after a group called the Alliance for Better Utah that was opposing it. He accused them of being agents for the Chinese communists, a foreign government. They came back and said, the only foreign interest in this data center is Kevin from Canada. And so a couple months after that, on a June post, June 25th, on X, he conceded that he had absolutely no evidence that these groups are people that he named as being funded by China. there had absolutely no evidence for it. And both he and Fox News have now been sued by these people for defamation. Good for them. Good for them.

That's one particular case where that, you know, you can, you know, speech is free, as they say, but for lies, you've got to pay for that. And he should pay for that lie. That is a heinous lie. A spokesperson for the Pro-AI Innovation Council told the Daily Caller, that the anti-data center campaign was, quote, manufactured up by dark anti-American forces and foreign governments. Well, I got to say, if it is anti-American government to oppose a surveillance state, what does

that tell us that the American government is? It's a surveillance state, and it wants to be an even worse surveillance state. All this rests on the premise that ordinary Americans wouldn't oppose data centers unless somebody in Beijing was pulling the strings. We figured it out for ourselves, though. Polling shows 71% of Americans opposed building an AI data center in their area. They don't like the water requirements. They don't like the noise.

They don't like the power requirements. It's not rocket science. But it goes beyond just the local area. You have to understand that even if the data center is not right next door to you, It's going to be used to spy on you. And we're not talking about, again, they like to use this term data center. It confuses some people. That's not a data center.

It is a hyperscale surveillance center. Let's understand what it is. They are hyper-scaling the surveillance that they've already got. They're hyper-scaling the data centers. They've already got a lot of data centers that are doing benign things, quite frankly. They're used for cloud storage or used for off-site backup. That's not an issue. It's never been an issue.

But this is completely different, both in quantity and in the quality and the purpose of what it is for. That is the reality that we're talking about here. They like to just call it a data center. It's not a data center. It's a surveillance center. It's not even a surveillance center. It's a hyper-scale surveillance center. We'll be right back.

Hello, it's me, Volodymer Zelensky. I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirt. everywhere for years. You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America. I could dress better. And I could, if only David Knight, would send me one of his beautiful gray McGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the McGuffin logo in blue. But he told me to get lost. Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at the David Knight Show.com. You should be able to buy me several hundred, those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful. I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various gala and social events. If you want to save on shipping,

just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA. You know, it's going to be interesting when this election comes up. I think it's going to be an interesting test case to see if they work at all. If they do work at all, the GOP should be very, very, very afraid. I've somewhat come to recognize elections somewhere along the line of urology, something, a fictional system that is designed to control people. But if there is anything there at all, and of course, the elections are easily manipulated if it is a close election, if it is something that is one-sided, heavily. one-sided. I don't think they have the ability yet to control that. I may be wrong in that. Maybe

they can control that as well. But we're looking at 71% of Americans opposed building an AI data center in their area. I would say even higher percentage of that opposes paying 70% more for diesel fuel and all the costs that that builds into the system. And look at all the economic damage that Trump has done. More than 53% who oppose a local nuclear plant. So 53% don't want to a nuke plant next to them, but 71% don't want a data center next to them. Nearly half, 48% are strongly opposed. 61% of Republicans. That's not a fringe issue.

That is close to a consensus, says Ken Kleppenstein, who's talking about Trump's move to criminalize any dissent about this technology that's being rapidly imposed and subsidized. What people distrust is how it's being rolled out. 71% said it will make their personal information less secure. 67% had little or no confidence the federal government could regulate it. 61% want more control over how AI is used in their lives. About 6 and 10 worry that government's regulations will be too lax.

I'm worried that the government is going to regulate it to keep other people out while they continue to fund and subsidize it for the big guys like Elon Musk. The Trump administration's response is to treat all opposition to AI and data centers as counterintelligence matter. So if you oppose the spies, you must be a spy. In June, the Justice Department intervened in an NACP lawsuit against Elon Musk and his XAI. This is because the NACP got into it, because when Musk is building this massive data center in Memphis, he's doing it in the poor

black areas. Dozens of gas turbines, the company is running without air permits. And I mean, we're not talking about environmental crazies. I mean, this is something that you can literally smell and taste if you go through the area. That's so massive. The department asked the federal judge to throw the case out, arguing that the NAACP lawsuit threatens American national, economic, and energy security. It's a security issue.

It is a security state that wants to spy on you, and they don't care what they do to you in the meantime. Government filed a sworn declaration. They had Cameron Stanley, the Pentagon's chief, digital and AI officer. He swore to the court that GROC was, quote, a matter of paramount national security. Trump warning about conspiracy theorists while alleging a vast Chinese plot for which his allies have produced virtually no evidence. But Ken Klippenstein says,

Kevin O'Leary will have plenty of time to find some evidence during the discovery portion of his defamation lawsuit. If there's any of there, he's got a lot of time to look for it. When people who distrust the government's handling of AI are told that their distrust is traitorous, foreign propaganda, punishable by jail time, it's hard to imagine them trusting that government anymore. It's easy to imagine them trusting it less, wondering what the government is so eager to keep them from asking. And as I, I don't know if I played the clip or not last week, but I saw a clip from Bill Burr. And he was talking about AI. And he said, he had a great quote. He said, they want to put this stuff out there, not because what you and I are doing.

It's because what they're about to do. That's what they're afraid of. What they're about to do. That's why they want the national security state. And we understand that. We look at this and it's like, if you build this tyrannical infrastructure, they will come. It is a field of schemes, isn't it? So while we see the open betrayal of the USA for Israel's benefit, a real conspiracy, not a

thing, is turning us into a China surveillance state. As a matter of fact, you have Wallace Sean, the actor, who said, you know, when you look at, we always become the enemies that we fight, don't we? So Israel has become the Nazis and worse. and America wants to become the Chinese communist and worse. I mean, the Israelis invaded somebody else's territory. So did we. People's homes.

And they did many of the things that the Nazis did to the Jews. And now they're really doing. You can't be more evil than what they're. doing. They are doing evil. That is just as great as what the, what the Nazis did. And in some ways, it's worse because they'd have boast about it. Right. Hitler had the decency to try to keep it secret. Right. For some reason, for some reason, Hitler didn't want people to know he was doing these things to the Jews. It was a secret. The Israel. Israelis are almost proud of it and don't keep it a secret and it's demonically evil.

Hey, but you know, if they're really good at it, that's all that really matters, right? According to Peter Thiel, there's no standard of right and wrong. The only standard is competence. So if you're really good at killing people, really good at destroying the land, you know, killing all the civilians and then dumping 11. thousand times the amount of glyphosate that you typically do, digging up the ancient olive trees in Lebanon and dumping all that glyphosate. 22,000, whatever the unit was, typically it's two, right?

And they put in 22,000 units of, I forget what the units were per area of glyphosate. No, they're poisoning the land. And so when we look at what is happening here at home, Homeland Security is now monitoring the activists who are building the anti-flock tech. This is a story from Reason. The company that I mentioned earlier, Sparrow Map, uses volunteer cameras to track the police in the same way the police track the public. The government sees that as a threat because they want to have a monopoly on surveillance, just as we see so many people in government and some people in law enforcement, Some people in law enforcement are very strong supporters of the Second Amendment.

But you also have the others who will reliably line up to testify for the Democrats when they want to take guns. They want to make sure that only the government has these weapons. And same thing is happening here. They want only the government to have these surveillance tools. They don't want you watching them. Harmland Security Fusion Centers have started monitoring anti-surveillance activists. An intelligence report compiled in Massachusetts redistributed by the Wisconsin Fusion Center. Let me just say this.

These fusion centers are a product of the surveillance state that kicked off supposedly in response to the inside job of 9-11. And they've been around for a while. Actually, they got a lot of publicity in 2009, after the 2008 election, you had a memo that went out from, I think it was a Michigan Fusion Center, if I remember correctly, and it told the police, be on the lookout for any cars that have a bumper sticker in support of Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin. Because Ron Paul had run as, I think he was running as a Republican.

He might have been running. He did run as a libertarian, but that was back in 86, I think, that he ran as a libertarian. But they said, watch out for anybody that has a Ron Paul or. or a Chuck Baldwin. Chuck Baldwin ran on the Constitution Party ticket. They said, these people may be sovereign citizens. And that is a code word to most law enforcement. They have been trained that sovereign citizens are armed and ready to have a shootout

with the police. So it's like saying, you know, this person is an escaped bank robber, armed, you know, that type of thing. We label them as a sovereign citizen. I remember listening to, going through the radio on my way home, from work about 2015 or 16. And there was this station, had Glenn Beck and so I thought,

well, let me hear what he's talking about. I don't normally listen to Glenn Beck. And he was there. Somebody said something about a fusion center. He said, what is that? I'm like, come on, you can't not know what a fusion center is. That's pretty famous after they came after supporters of Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin. And so he got his co-host to link it up on Wikipedia.

And they read the definition there from Wikipedia. is this guy really that stupid or is it something that he is just putting out there to pretend that he doesn't know? Because in 2014, when the Bundy Ranch situation happened, I remember he had an interview with Cliven Bundy and he said, are you a sovereign citizen? Cliven Bundy didn't know what that law enforcement code word was about. He goes, well, I don't know. I guess I'm sovereign. for sovereignty of citizens. And I saw that, man, Glenn Beck is putting a bull's eye on his back and he doesn't even know it.

And I've always thought that about Glenn Beck. I've always thought that just like Alex Jones, he is a limited hangout who is there to get your confidence and then to turn at key points, which is what we've seen them both do. Sparrow Map, however, uses automated license plate reader technology to track police vehicles in real time. Social media informed users have called it the surveillance of government vehicle movement

to include law enforcement vehicles. Sparrow Map processes the publicly available live streams from municipal cameras and footage provided by volunteers using everyday cameras, whether it's on an old laptop and iPhone or ring doorbell. Out of the 300,000 vehicles that are logged by the network's 14,196 cameras every day, only a few dozen are police vehicles. the rest of the data is quickly deleted. Spara's own how-to guide says volunteers point cameras at public roads, and everything they see goes into one shared database that anyone can read. No account, no login, no permissions.

Because this is stuff that's in public, right? A person confirms anything before it is published as a government vehicle. Everything else becomes an anonymous dot that fades in 45 seconds and is deleted in 14. days. You know, we've always heard the expression that when the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. I would say maybe we need to update that a little bit and say, when the people watch the government, there's liberty. When the government watches the people, that is tyranny. And so ICE is really the focus of SparrowNet. And I think there's a good reason for that.

When you look at the doctrine that's been established for Border Patrol, the idea that everything within 100 miles of the actual border is now under the jurisdiction of customs and border patrol. And of course, ICE as well. And they presume that they have the right to search your phones or do anything they want. And that was just upheld by the Second Circuit Court. and that is a direct violation folks of the Fourth Amendment. So what they're saying is, if you look at within 100 miles of the border going all the way around, which does things like encompasses the entire state of Florida, for example.

So all of that now is a constitution free zone. This is one of the reasons why I think Trump is using this border issue that he could have solved in a lot of very simple ways. but he chose not to. Instead, he chose to weaponize it and to wedgify it, if you will, right, this issue, and use it to push a national police force. And there's a big reason for that. If you look at that 100-mile border, that is one-third of America's land mass area.

Okay. But it is two-thirds of America's population. Now is in a Constitution-free zone, a Fourth Amendment free zone. And he is rapidly building this federal police force based on the ruse of immigration control. So National Security Presidential Memorandum 7. Countering domestic terrorism and organized political violence, Trump instructed federal law enforcement to begin criminalizing opposition to the administration, including by persecuting those opposing its surge of federal law enforcement into the Midwest

as part of a nationwide immigration crackdown. So it's not just immigration crackdown, but now they want to do the same thing with people who oppose, even with peaceful demonstrations. The use of these hyperscale data centers to spy on us and the people who protest the flock cameras. So that is what people are reacting to. They want to have no federal police.

By linking Sparrow Map to threats against ICE, The Fusion Center flagged for federal surveillance and potential prosecution an activist group that is recognized as law abiding. Because the federal police are not recognized as law abiding. They don't think that there is any law or constitution that controls them. You can see it in the actions of ICE. You can see it in the instructions from the people that Trump has put in charge of ICE and Border Patrol. They are absolutely contemptuous of both the Constitution and of the Posse Cometatis Act. The federal government created 80 fusion centers around the country in the wake of 9-11,

and so in less than eight years. They began labeling the political supporters of Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin as potentially violent terrorists. So what are they going to be doing now? both FBI and DHS memos routinely circulating intelligence reports to statewide fusion centers before making their way down to local police departments and sheriff's offices. Yeah, they were saying we want to know, we have to centralize control, and we have to get the information from the local law enforcement,

and we pull that into our database so we have complete situational awareness. And, yeah, total information control, right? Except that they also push down from the top. They push stuff out to the local law enforcement agencies, telling them, oh, by the way, you know, those people with those bumper stickers, those, you better be on the lookout for those people because they could kill you. And so you'd be ready to kill them when you pull them over. Increasingly describing activists who oppose mass surveillance as well as AI and data centers

using language usually reserved for domestic terrorists. And it is kind of interesting, the novel terms that they have come up with when you look at this. And as this article from Reason points out, there are open source intelligence tools that even though they're available to everybody, they're so prohibitively expensive that for all practical purposes, only the government uses them. That is the goal, folks, of this fear campaign about AI,

is to make sure that only they have these technological tools. One of these, for example, is Shadow Dragon, system that allows the government to surveil those opposing the various surveillance the government is engaged in. A Massachusetts Fusion Center report on Sparrow Map combines two novel threat categories. These are the labels that they're putting out against people. The first one is a new term, anti-technology extremism. And Reason says, well, the problem with that label is that the people at Sparrow are not anti-technology extremists. They're actually using technology.

And that's what they don't want you to do. That's why the AI fear campaign, they don't want any of us having those tools. So they came up with yet another absurd term, a new threat category because anti-technology extremism doesn't really work. They came up with anti-surveillance extremism. Yeah, let's get to the point here. This is not about grid usage. It's not about water usage. It's not about noise and pollution from these plants.

No, it's about surveillance. And if you oppose the surveillance, if you're anti-surveillance state, then you are an anti-surveillance extremist. Well, I would say that extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. I believe that. I believe that. And where did that term come from? Who coined the term anti-surveillance extremism?

That came from Simon Perdue, The director of violent extremist threats at Middle East Media Research Institute. Typically, you'll see this listed as memory, M-E-M-R-I. Memory, by the way, here's your Zionist connection. Memory is a Zionist machine. It was founded by a former mass. agent, as a matter of fact, co-founded by a former Mossad agent, Israeli intelligence, and a woman whose husband is David Wormsher, advisor to George W. Bush on behalf of the false intelligence

to support the Iraq war. And so these people have a long history. As a matter of fact, if you look at their mission statement before 9-11, they were open. about it. Their mission statement before 9-11 said, we're about continuing relevance of Zionism to Jewish people and to the state of Israel. For some reason, they changed that right after 9-11. They softened it up. What were their connections? But as usual, we see the Zionists are out there trying to destroy the Constitution, trying to destroy free speech, trying to not only censor people, but to ban them and now calling for people to be punished by jailing them and other issues like that. And they are at the epicenter of this artificial intelligence surveillance state.

And the epicenter of artificial intelligence is another AI, and that is artificial Israel, which is really what we ought to call the Zionist. It's not real Israel. It's not true Israel. It's not the Israel of the Bible, not genetically, not ethnically, not ethnically, not spiritually. They are not Israel in any sense of the word. They're artificial Israel, and they want AI artificial intelligence following us. Reuters poll conducted last month found that 47% of respondents did not want a flock safety camera in their neighborhood. Only 21% of adults below the age of 35 supported

a flock camera. Why is it that high? I don't get it. I don't get it. But who are they? What was the pitch? We'll watch you constantly. Oh, I like that. It makes me feel safer, doesn't it? Well, you know, when you have a situation, as long as it's not weaponized with artificial intelligence and, you know, turned into a surveillance system, I don't have a problem with the camera itself.

And I think that's what these people really don't understand. They see the tree, but they don't understand the forest behind it. And there's no problem with somebody having a camera. on their house. There's no problem with somebody recording somethings on their house. The problem comes when they put it together into a database and they start selling this information to the government. That's where the problem comes in. License plate readers went up on my road without anybody asking and the data only goes one way. I built Sparrow Map, says the person who did it, to give people the government transparency that they are entitled to. And honestly, to give the watchers

a taste of how it feels to be watched. And they don't like that. Not at all. If it makes them uncomfortable, they should understand why the public doesn't want mass surveillance. Well, it does make them uncomfortable. As a matter of fact, you had a congressional committee hearing where they wanted the people who were running these surveillance systems to come and talk to them.

They refused to do so. But we know, because we have seen these things being put up on bicycle paths and other things like that where there are no cars. We know it's not about cars. And Josh Hawley pointed out, yeah, they are bragging about the fact that they can image and identify people just like China does. Block admits that they're capturing and saving images of people. What seems to make these networks unique is not just the sheer number of cameras. It's the fact that they're all linked together empowered and searchable by AI.

It's unlike anything we've ever seen in this country before, and to give you just a sense of it. I mean, here are some of what these cameras can do. This surveillance network uses thousands of these AI-powered cameras to capture and analyze images of passing vehicles. Let's see if we can give you a sense of it. Here's a flock image. They store and catalog details like the vehicles make, model, color, location, date, time. Flock's searchable features include details like dense and roof cracks and vehicle damage and racks on the roof or racks on the back or specific bumper stickers even. And you think about that.

I mean, Flock can tell you if a car has a Trump sticker or a Harris sticker or a pro-life America sticker or a Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin sticker. Quite extraordinary. Flok's cameras can even recognize whether people are in the images. and in fact, Fluck admitted in a letter to me ahead of this hearing that you could search their database based on people's images. You could ask to search people, images that had people, images that are scanning the inside of the cars. I mean, this is really quite extraordinary.

Flok is not the only player in this field, of course. There are other companies, Motorola, Axon, Verkata, and they've also built these vast surveillance networks that are also supercharged by AI, And the thing is, when you harness all of these things together, you get a capability based on the reporting that is different in kind than anything we've ever seen in this country. What Senator Josh Hawley said is insane. Yeah, there's absolutely nothing new about that.

We've known this for quite some time and talked about it for quite some time. I'm glad that he's talking about it. I'm not going to criticize him for going over because there are a lot of people who haven't gotten the memo yet. You know, 21% of adults below the age of 35 support fly cameras. they don't understand what this is about yet. So we need to repeat this message over and over again. But we've got to be careful. You know, there was a time when nobody knew what CBDC was.

When you talk about that, I remember when I went to the Tennessee legislature and I got an elevator with a guy. And he said, what are you here to talk about? I said, I'm here to talk about CBD. And he said, oh, yeah, we got CBD authorized for use over there in East Tennessee. He thought I was talking about CBD. cannabis oil, right, for medical use. And so again, there was a tremendous amount of ignorance on CBDC. People woke up to that. Unfortunately, they're still not aware of CCDC, clony capitalist digital currency, the things like tether and things like that, the stable coins. That's the way

they're going to roll this out. And we can focus on flock and not see what's happening with Axon. And in many regards, axon is more dangerous than flock. So we need to understand what the issue is here. And he did lay that out with surveillance. Look, we said from the very beginning, these things are not just about automated license plate readers. That'd be bad enough. But the fact that they can identify idiosyncrasies on each car, as he's talking about, dense or bumper stickers or this or that, and they know what those bumper stickers about. They know who you support. And they identify you that way. This has been one of the hall marks folks of geospatial intelligence from the very beginning.

It was designed to be able to identify people's religious and political beliefs and to then target you based on that. And so this is not something that just happened to come along. It was part of it from the very beginning. And if they can identify idiosyncrasies on a vehicle, you better believe they can identify idiosyncrasies on you as well. That is all part of it. We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.

David Night Show. All right, welcome back. And as we're looking at the connections to all of this stuff, we know how this goes back to geospatial intelligence, a fastest growing part of the intelligence community since the late 1990s, as soon as they had the infrastructure of the Internet, which had been proposed by a DARPA psychologist, JCR Licklider, back in the 1960s, once that became practical for them, they jumped with both feet into the venture capital business to make sure they had people competing that they could fund and roll this stuff out for free to everybody to get quick adoption

and to make sure that the people that they funded, whoever the winners were going to be, were going to be amenable to their agenda. So this has been there for quite some time. But it's not just the U.S. government either. It's the Israeli government. And this is really the basis when you look at the merger between the U.S. and Israel military and intelligence agencies, they do have a common cause. And unfortunately now a common ethic, which is to say none at all, quite frankly. But design is to demand not only censorship,

but canceling of people. Now to be punished criminally, they are the center of this big brother surveillance. And you know, from the standpoint that, you know, you can see this double standard being adopted here in the same way that the Muslims have done this in the UK. the double standard that is there. We're seeing that happening here. For example, if you are, you cannot legally call for the boycott of Israel,

they can call for you to be banned. They can call for you to be canceled, for you to be fired, for you to have travel restrictions on you, but don't, you say, well, I don't want to do business with them because of what I see them doing.

No, they will come after you for that. And then the flip side, and we got more than 30 states who have laws about that, the flip side of it, is that, for example, in Florida, only Israeli bonds are allowed in terms of foreign bonds. So Florida statute, local government may invest surplus phones only in listed categories. And the only foreign sovereign option is rated or unrated bonds backed by the faith and credit of the government of Israel.

No other country's bonds are allowed. Think about that. And what did we see? We had that individual, his name is Caruso. I think it's Michael Crusoe. He was somebody who, along with Randy Fine, these two guys go with DeSantis to Israel to sign a Florida bill, censoring criticism of Israel, a foreign government. and then handing the pen to Benjamin Netanyahu. And we found out Michael Caruso, you know, Randy Fine, of course, is a congressman there in Florida.

Michael Caruso is a county commissioner in Palm Beach, and he got billions of dollars of Israeli bonds. As a matter of fact, the most, the largest purchase of Israeli bonds outside of Israel by any government entity. And it was by a county, by Palm Beach County. And then after the election, it was exposed. They held it until after the election it was exposed, that he was alleged and arrested for the pedophile activities against, I think it was a younger, I think it was his grandson. It's a younger family member that he did. So the guy's a pedophile. And he bought, he was responsible and defended the, it was over a billion dollars in Israeli bonds that that county bought.

And all of Florida. You can only buy Israeli bonds. If you're going to buy bonds of another country, it can only be Israel. Think about the kind of control that they have already set up. And think about what is really going on with this Epstein group. There was an interesting, I didn't see this reported anywhere else. I saw this clip. And this is Epstein's accountant.

And this is a clip that came from closed door hearings. And look at what? they revealed about the individual that alleged that she was raped by both at a very young age, I think it was like 13 or 14. She was raped, she said, by Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. Meet Richard Kahn, Jeffrey Epstein's longtime personal accountant and one of the men in charge of his massive estate. Under oath in a closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee, Khan was asked point-blank about Jane Doe No. 4, the woman who claims. She claimed she was raped by both Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump when she was just 13 to 15 years old.

Watch what happened. Is it true that Jane Dove 4? The citation is Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein 1-19 CV-0-765, Southern District of New York, received a financial settlement directly from the estate as her attorney is Clark. I'm sorry, I don't know who Jane Dove 4 is. She's the person who has been widely described as alleging that President Trump raped or abused her when she was 13 in the 1980s. And her attorney is out there and said that she received a settlement from the estate.

Congressman, may I just tell him who Jane DeFore is or refreshes him? Okay. I believe I understand who you're referring to. If you don't mind, may you please repeat the question? Is it true that she received a financial settlement directly from the estate? Her attorney said that she has. I believe that Jane Doe 4 received a settlement via mediation with the estate, I believe, in 2025. He flat out admits it.

The Epstein estate settled with Jane Doe number four in 2025. But then... Go off the record for two seconds because they... Sure. Well, no. Off the record. Yes. when we were off the record, we had a discussion about an individual previously described as Jane Doe 4.

The name that was provided to us in confidence or off the record as to Jane Doe 4's last name is not a name that neither I nor Mr. Khan is familiar with. The lawyer steps in. They go off the record, get her real last name, come back on record, And boom, total 180. The very next day, less than 24 hours later, Kahn's lawyer calls the committee and flips again. We can neither confirm nor deny whether any settlement was paid to Jane Doe number four. Three completely contradictory statements

in under 24 hours, all tied to the most infamous sex trafficking case in American history. He admitted it on camera, then denied knowing her at all, then dodged completely. This is Epstein's own accountant, the man who handled the money, caught in a whirlwind of contradictions about a settlement with a woman accusing both Epstein and Trump.

Yeah, think about that. You know, her attorney said yes. After this guy kind of hedges a bit and dodges and said who that is, oh, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, we gave her money. Yeah, there was a settlement with him. Then his lawyer comes in and says, no, no, that didn't happen. then his lawyer thinks about the fact that he's lying about all this stuff so anything comes back so we can neither confirm nor deny this i think they did confirm it quite frankly

and then if you want to look at how this uh this system that is being set up to spy and control us look at what this looks like when you give these tools to people a man commented on social media on Facebook. He said, F you and your flock cameras to a South Carolina police department. And then the police chief himself reportedly messaged him, threatening to have U.S. marshals arrest him for unlawful communications. Unlawful communications? Have you read the First Amendment? There are no unlawful communications in there. You are free to criticize our government. You're even free to criticize Israel. of the Constitution. I know they don't like that, but it's there nevertheless. As a matter of fact,

he provided screenshots of the Facebook account. And it was called the Ridge Spring Police Department. They responded to him and electronically said, I will be obtaining a warrant for your unlawful communications. And I'll have the U.S. Marshals pick you up. You're going to make a federal case out of this because that's what the federal police are there for to make. make sure that you don't criticize them or the foreign government that controls them. Here's another example. In Indiana Sheriff's Deputy arrested for making 6,000 illegal flock searches to track his wife and his ex-girlfriends. And again, this is only newsworthy because we've had so many of these.

This is only newsworthy because of the quantity that he did of these. six thousand times he violated the Fourth Amendment. But let's not have any talk about trust in men, right? When we talk about the flock system. As a matter of fact, this is what Jefferson said. He said, in questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. If only they would do that with Trump.

But here's another thing. I will just put it this way. That's what Jefferson says, and he's absolutely right. Here's a quote from David Knight. Don't give people weapons of tyranny and think that they're not going to use them. That's the problem with all this. You put this out and look, every person in that Indiana Sheriff's Department did not do this. But you put that kind of power in people's hands, and you're going to have somebody who will do that.

And we want to make sure that they don't have the power. to do this type of thing. And it is not enough to find somebody and to charge them. Don't give them the weapons, right? He now faces over 400 felony charges. I'm sorry, that's just not good enough. They should have never given him the ring of power because you're always going to find a boormir somewhere.

Don't ever give them that kind of power because it will be abused. That's a given. So Trump just keeps casually accusing news outlets of treason as well. Not just people who are critics of AI and flock and surveillance and the police state. No, if you criticize Trump himself, you're guilty of treason. And there's a lot more evidence for that because understand, in Trump's mind, he is the government. Yeah.

So the traitor is projecting his treason. on to other people. Trump is reporting that people are critical of his administration are treasonous. They're sick, treasonous, and demented. People, you know, organizations like CNN and MS now, the post that he put up is at least the third time this month, the ninth time since March, the Trump has accused news outlets of treasonous reporting. And that comes after his treasonous.

and ruinous war in support of Israel. That is why he is so careful of this. And this article from media matters, they have all nine quotes that he has. Here's one from December the 9th, 2025. He said, I actually believe that it is seditious, perhaps even treasonous, for the New York Times and others to consistently do fake reports

in order to libel and to demean, and they puts it all uppercase, the president of the United States. Well, you're not a president. You're a king, you're a dictator. You are the government in your own eyes. As he's told people, I am the code. I am the law, right? Like a judge dread.

And so if you want to see what he's going to do with his federal police force, we've already seen more than enough, but besides the massive, order for electric shock gloves that I put in, $20 million worth of those. They're now also buying robot dogs. You know, the Boston Dynamics, of course, Boston Dynamics has been bought by South Korean company Hyundai. So they want to have all these robot dogs as well.

They put in several million dollars for robot dogs. Because as I said before, the whole immigration thing is just a beard to establish federal policing. They have one-third of the landmass, two-thirds of the population under their control, and no rules whatsoever, according to Trump. ICE is trying to add AI-integrated robot dogs. And, of course, they will be connected with their cameras to the AI data centers as well. And they love this type of thing because they've got their own little, I guess you'd say, dog and pony show, but actually, I guess it is. They're a drone and doggy show that they're put out.

This is a propaganda video from the Department of Homeland Security. They call it the Year of the Patriot. Maybe it's the Year of the Patriot Act, because that's really what this all this stuff was looking forward to. They're now realizing it. We interrupt our program at the request of the White House. Yeah, the request of the White House is to have militarized police who have no rules of engagement, no law, nothing restraining them. not the Constitution, not the laws, not the rules of war from the Pentagon, not the rules of war that have been agreed upon by international sources. No, you can kill anybody you want anywhere.

Extrajudicially. It's disgusting to see this kind of stuff, but that's what Trump is really all about. As a matter of fact, when you look at this and all the fear that is out there, a continual fear campaign about AI, and it is, I think, it's got its own agenda. And I've said that in this program here. This is Jeffrey Hinton. The guy is a Nobel laureate. It's commonly referred to as Godfather of AI. He is now pushing this. He said, dire warnings about the technology they helped to bring into being. They said, so is this bad like nuclear weapons? Oh, no. Nuclear weapons don't have any good use. Well, nuclear power is good. If you could do it cleanly and you've got a, you got a back-end story about what you're going to do

with a nuclear waste. That's something that they typically kick the can down the road. They certainly did it with that. But he said, it is conceivable that humanity is just in a passing phase of evolution of intelligence. Again, it's this guy godless evolutionist, perhaps. He said, there's a danger

of something really bad happening, and he agrees with the fear campaign that 10 to 20% chance that AI will kill everybody, but they're going to continue to do it anyway. And the only thing that's going to stop it, of course, is the government regulating this Frankenstein monster? They're going to keep building the monster, making it bigger all the time, unless government regulates other people.

But then the government will continue to fund them to build the Frankenstein monster, which they think is going to be under their control. That is what this stuff is all about. And I've got to say that it's the government that is pushing this. It is the government that is weaponizing and using this. and I say that there's a greater chance than 10 to 20% that our governments are going to kill us all. They already tried to do it in 2020. And they're trying to do it now.

They're so hell-bent on creating World War III. Look at Europe pushing with this Ukraine war, trying to get Russia, baiting Russia to attack them so they can unleash nuclear weapons. As a matter of fact, you just had a film that was put out actually is a kind of a PSA that was put out in France. where they go through and they war and game all this stuff and you've got the heroic French president who is reluctant to fire nuclear weapons, but then he decides that he has to do it. So they are doing the predictive programming already running through Hollywood to show a nuclear exchange. You've got France, Germany, and the UK talking about how they've got to bring up soldiers and get prepared to do this type of thing.

Yeah, I think there's greater than a 20% chance. that our own governments are going to kill us. I think it's greater than that. I think there's also a chance that they will use AI to do it and claim plausible deniability. Well, yeah, hey, it was a software bug. Who knew? You know, this thing hallucinated and it fired the missiles or did that.

They're putting all these things under the control of artificial intelligence. So on the one hand, they want to tell you, it's so dangerous it could kill us all. And on the other hand, they say, let's give it all the weapons. How can this not be seen by people? It's beyond incredible that people cannot put these two things together and realize that the real issue is government. AI is just a tool of dangerous people who have been putting this together. And again, the clip that I played for you earlier, Peter Thiel said the only real way to slow AI is to have a one-world government. He does say that cure would be worse than the disease, perhaps,

but he thinks that, you know, you're going to have to have a world government. It'll be yet another reason to have that there. And they're always looking for a reason to do it. And as I played for you earlier, the fact that he says that evil is good if it is really competent, right? It's not evil if it's competent. When you look at the reluctance of these people to have themselves filmed, I played for you before a crew that was in Atlanta, and they were going around the flock corporation and they were taking some pictures and they called the police on them, called their security on them, I identified them as dangerous terrorists to the police to try to get them shot, I guess. And they do not want to testify before Congress. Well, internet users found the house of the flock CEO.

His name is Garrett Langley. I saw Oliver X people put up pictures of Garrett Langley and said he doesn't want people to know his name or what he looks like. So please don't share this. In other words, inviting people to share it. They also got on to Google Maps and they marked his front lawn as a public toilet. that was kind of funny. I guess it's a stricent effect, huh?

So Flock and other tech firms will not talk to the Senate. They don't want pictures of themselves. They don't want pictures of their homes. Justin Amash, who, by the way, was not pro-Israel enough to remain in Congress, says Americans are violating the privacy rights of the government's surveillance devices. As a matter of fact, Flock safety has issued a legal demand seeking removal. of a public map showing the locations of approximately 300,000 of its surveillance devices across

the U.S. So again, it's very much like the state of Israel, isn't it? And they're all on the same page. Now, the government told a fifth generation lobster man, put a GPS tracker on your boat 24-7, or you will lose your license. There's no warrant, there was no crime, no suspicion of a crime, only Frank Thompson, who is over 60 years on the water, and he will either be tracked every single minute by the state of Maine, or they will put him out of business. This is the Permission Society. First of all, he had to have a license.

He shouldn't have to have a license. This is not liberty. This is not a free country. This is a surveilled country. That's what these people are truly about. We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back. You're listening to the David Knight Show.

Welcome back. Let's talk a little bit about something that is far more important than politics. Does the Bible really contradict itself? You know, they've had a couple of videos that have gone viral on TikTok. They think, oh, we've caught the Bible and contradictions that don't make any sense.

Well, it turns out that they do. It's just somebody who is, very ignorant in terms of their context. But I would say this, atheism contradicts common sense. That is the real issue. But, you know, these are the cases that he puts up. You know, we have over and over again, he picks a couple of passages, but it's everywhere in the Bible, the fact that God knows all things, the fact that God is everywhere and

all-powerful as well. So he says, so God says, he's all-knowing, but then he says he's going to go down to the cities of Sodom and Gomor to know how sinful they are being. An all-knowing God would already know that. An all-knowing God would already be there, he said. And so what is going on with that? It's very similar to what we see in Genesis, right? You know, after Adam and Eve have committed cosmic treason, I guess we could say. It's a minor thing. They ate a piece of fruit. That doesn't sound like anything, but it was the spirit in which it was done in defiance of God. That was the issue that was

there. And so, you know, God is walking in the garden. They like to anthropomorphize this. He says, Adam, where are you? So God doesn't know where Adam is? Or is this a rhetorical question? Is this being done in an anthropomorphic sense in the sense that, you know, we talk about God, hands and his eyes and things like that. It actually kind of bothered me. That's one thing I don't really like about that video I put together. I think how we change it. You know, there's places in there where you anthropomorphize it and you show, you know,

a large hand that is waving over the land and it comes to life where you show a man-shaped spirit or something like that. These are just ways to, the Bible does also talk about, you know, God's eyes or upon. So God doesn't have eyes in that sense. He does see. He is aware, but these are all anthropomorphic things to help us to identify and to visualize this. And then he comes up with another claim. He says, well, of course, God is love, but then he talks about how he is jealous. That is a case of just not understanding what the language is. I mean, when you look at our translations of Greek or Hebrew, for example. When we talk about love, there's four different words for love in

the Greek. And you see them used differently. But in the English language translation, there is no distinction between the love of a family, brotherly love, erotic, sexual love, or agape, selfless love. You know, there's no, there's no distinction between those different types of love. And there are different types of jealousy as well if you look at the Hebrew word. There's one type of jealousy that is related in root to another word for jealous, but it is completely different. It's only used for God. And it really talks about his righteous and exclusive claims of relationship.

And so those types of sophomoric criticisms of the Bible are really based in ignorance. And yet, when we look at the fact that heavens declare the glory of God, night after night, they pour forth speech. The new atheism is being disproven by science. This is an article from Selman Duke at the New American. He said, yeah, we see these reports all the time about Noah's Ark and the resting place. It's now been 100% confirmed.

Not actually true. That's a lot of clickbait. nevertheless, science has proved something else that New Atheism's ship has sailed and maybe even sunk. And when he talks about New Atheism, he's talking about some of the more recent sophomore criticisms of people like Richard Dawkins. Remember back in 2006, Richard Dawkins talked about New Atheism in his book, The God Delusion. we always talk about the Dawkins dilution and it kind of boils down to the fact that well Dawkins has never seen or experienced God

therefore he doesn't exist well I've never seen or experienced Richard Dawkins except to hear about him in the same way that Richard Dawkins has heard about God so I'm not really sure that Dawkins exists by the same standard and of course part of that was also Christopher Hitchens his book God is Not Great

Sam Harris who by the way I've got a clip here of Sam Harris. Where is that? I didn't write that down. I wanted to play that. Here it is right here. Here's Sam. We talked about Peter Thiel's definitions of good and evil.

Listen to Sam Harris. You know, why can't we eat babies? What's wrong with eating babies? If we've got extra babies around that nobody wants, why can't we eat them? Right? Yeah, why not? Again, without any absolute standards, these guys come up with these, kind of strangest moral conundrums here.

Why can't we have baby? I don't understand. What's the rules for any of this stuff? Well, again, his article is really about a couple of things that we've covered many times in the show, the cosmology. As you see an expanding universe, as you see a scientist now looking at cosmology and saying, well, it had to have a beginning. If it had a beginning, then, you know, what did that?

And why is everything ordered? And why does everything in just the real? right way to exist anthropomorphically. But I've got more that I'll say about this on someday, but I want to get to the people who've made comments here. I've not talked about the comments all day today. Guard Goldsmith, Liberty Conspiracy, good to see you, Guard. He said Chinese restaurants in Tennessee might try making a new Marsha Blackburn special.

I wonder what could they use for that. Yeah, I guess get some of those Chinese fortune cookies. And thank you for the tip. IRS machine gun. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. And Dougalug, thank you, his oil. He said, here's some gas for the tank. I noticed that it is at 5-8. Yes, we are low of this month. It says thanks for speaking the word from time to time. And DG8, thank you for the tip. He said, David, T.P. USA is out there locally trying to merge all churches and denominations with local representatives, offering 300 Israeli flags, no Bibles, flags of a nation that rejects Jesus Christ. I don't support putting any flag of any nation in an assembly. It is about Christ, not politics. Keep that in mind. Thank you for joining us. The common man.

They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.

They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to. please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidnightshow.com.