The David Knight Show - Mon Episode #2365: Pfizer, Censorship and the Information Americans Never Heard

Episode Date: October 5, 2026

────────────────────────────────────────[00:02:08]Florida Sues Pfizer and Bourla Over "Deceptive Marketing" of COVID ShotsKnight says calling it deceptive marketing undersells the injuries and deaths of pregnant women, babies and teens.────────────────────────────────────────[00:04:36]Pfizer Knew of 1,223 Deaths and 52 Miscarriages by February 2021Meanwhile ex-YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki brags about deleting over a million COVID videos.────────────────────────────────────────[00:19:48]PREP Act Faces First Test as Pfizer's Latin American Blackmail ResurfacesPfizer demanded protection from fraud and manufacturing-defect liability, which Knight says proves they knew.────────────────────────────────────────[00:33:36]Yale-Tested Guilt Trips Sold the Shot Through Megachurch PulpitsKnight says Pfizer's "protect your loved ones" pitch was war-gamed, while the COVID emergency runs to 2029.────────────────────────────────────────[00:43:28]FDA's Tracy Beth Hoeg Fired After Challenging Mask and Vaccine OrthodoxyShe also flagged manipulated trial data behind the drug Tavneos, which stays on the US market.────────────────────────────────────────[00:54:45]Pennsylvania's "Measles Epidemic": 1,000 PCR Cases Among 13 Million PeopleKnight says the fear campaign doubled MMR doses, with Governor Shapiro tied to vaccine manufacturing.────────────────────────────────────────[01:01:57]Russia's "Plague" Is One Dead Lab Worker, but the White House Is "Assessing Options"Knight warns against a repeat of 2020 and recalls hospital protocols that kept ivermectin from dying patients.────────────────────────────────────────[01:12:40]Tennessee's Botched Execution of Christa Pike Exposes Lethal Injection TheaterKnight backs the death penalty for her crimes but says the state should not pretend killing is clinical.────────────────────────────────────────[01:47:16]France's Students Burn Schools: "It's Never About the Issue, It's the Revolution"Knight ties the riots to government schooling and says to get kids out of the burning building.────────────────────────────────────────[01:54:37]FlyDubai Math: A 24.5-Degree Dive Doesn't Match the Calm Passenger FootageKnight dissects the plane story and AI-looking photos, then the new AI czar, a crypto lawyer. ──────────────────────────────────────── Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code “KNIGHT” For high quality made in America products go to HomeSteadProducts.shop and use promo code “Knight” for 10% off your purchases Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

in a world of deceit. Telling the truth is a revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday the 5th of October. You have our Lord, 2006. Well, we have a Russian plague, and the Trump White House says they're on high alert and thinking about what they might do about it.

We're going to talk about what this plague really is as we have the pharmaceuticals, rep for a Pfizer, the Pennsylvania governor Shapiro is trying to sell a plague of measles in Pennsylvania. And we should be concerned about what Trump does with so-called plagues. And we're going to begin with that today. We're going to take a look at some of the layers of that pandemic onion that are finally being laid back in public after massive punishment of anybody who talked about that for the longest time. And then we have a botched execution in Tennessee. I guess also educations are botched. That's become global news. We're going to talk a little bit about that. The absurd responses,

the blind spots to all this, and a revolution in France. Is it the socialists or is it the immigrants? Who's using who? We'll be right back. Stay with us. Well, I want to begin with a massive of poisoning that has been going on for six years. And we still have this Maha movement that won't stop it. We have Mary Talley Bowden, a doctor, and MD. So a 13-year-old female died 18 days after the third COVID shot with chest pain. I wonder what that could be. Tackycardia, you know, fast heartbeat.

And EKG changes. You know, when we go back and look at this, we've had a certain thing, Certain terms that pharmaceutical companies have educated us about, haven't they? Certain things that become household words, things like myocarditis and paracarditis. I can still remember the first time I saw this stuff. I'm having to look it up and say, how do I pronounce that? I'm still having trouble, I guess, but myocarditis and paracarditis. These are household words.

You know, back in 1986, nobody had ever heard of autism. So I guess we should be grateful to pharmaceutical companies for expanding our vocabulary. And our medical knowledge, even though some people have not gotten the medical knowledge yet, these times haven't gotten the memo. But this is our greatest industry, headed by people from our greatest ally, aren't they? And so she also pointed out, a one-year-old boy died two days after receiving a Moderna shot. And this is not isolated either. And in his case, it was a seizure.

So we have Florida, the Attorney General, and he's not the first one to do it. We've had a couple of states have done this, is suing Pfizer and Albert Borla over deceptive marketing of COVID vaccines. There's no question about it. And you might want to just to conclude in that deceptive marketing practice, all the different mainstream media companies, Fox News, YouTube, all of these social media companies that were taking down videos and censoring any of, information. So the Florida Attorney General's name is Uthmeyer, I think is what he pronounced it. On Thursday, sued Pfizer, and Albert Borla, alleging the drugmaker misled the public by marketing the COVID-19 vaccines as safe and effective, while not disclosing that the vaccine's potential risk to pregnant women, children, and teenagers. Well, people of all ages, but especially

the youngest, the most vulnerable are the babies and the pregnant mothers. It was to deceptive marketing. And, of course, that is not protected under the PEP Act, right? The PEP Act, this massive legal shield, they laid the foundation for this folks for two decades. And George W. Bush was at the epicenter of this thing from the very beginning. But it is bipartisan. And it is something that the deep state has been laying for decades. I just have to say, you know, this is a good thing.

I'm glad he's suing them. But being sued for deceptive marketing. Was there ever an undersell bigger than this? Well, a bit deceptive on the marketing there. Deceptive marketing is like, oh, this will whiten your teeth and then it doesn't whiten your teeth. This says, this protects you. And then it, oh, well, it actually makes you sick, kills you, gives you all kinds of health problems. Who knows what else it does.

This is, like I said, it's such an undersell of what it actually is. Yeah, that's right. Yeah, they should have put a disclaimer on their like they do for all these other. commercials that they run all the time where they, you know, they have children running in slow motion in the field while they rattle off all these horrific side effects. Except they wouldn't have even known what to put on there because they didn't do any tests. Well, they did enough tests to know, actually. I guess they should have called, but they're Ask Your Fauci, right?

Don't ask us. We're not telling you it's safe and effective. He's going to do it because he's protected, right? Well, Pfizer's marketing campaign focused on two principal themes. One was that the shot posed no safety risks. The other one was that it was necessary to stop the spread. It turns out that neither one of those things was true. We now know very well documented how dangerous these things have been,

but they never even pretended to test its ability to stop the virus from spreading. They just asserted that that was going to be the case. Pfizer possessed extreme evidence that his vaccine did cause serious adverse events, including 1,223 deaths following vaccination as early as February of 2021, and 52 miscarriages. However, the company assured the public that the vaccine was safe. You know, we've had vaccines that have been pulled from the market in the past because they associated with seven deaths. 1,223 deaths. And remember, these things didn't roll out.

They started doing some of the earliest shots of doctors and nurses, unfortunately, in December of 2020. And we knew in January we could see what was happening with the VAERS database. It was already starting to blow up. I remember how the tally was going up. Look at this. We've already had just in a couple of weeks. More adverse effects on the vaccine adverse events reporting system, VAERS. We've had more reports on that in just the first couple of weeks than we've had in

years on these other things. First it's like two or three years and then all was it, five years and ten years and then all of a sudden it was more than all of the adverse events reported in the 30 years that they'd had. It didn't take too long to get there. But I remember reporting on that and saying, look at how this is going up. So we knew all that stuff. And they knew it too.

Not only did they know it with the VERS database system that they didn't want you to talk about. You got punished for talking about that. But they also knew it from their own. internal records as well. 1223 people killed. 52 miscarriages. Add that to that as well. And again, vaccines have been pulled from the market for seven deaths. How many deaths does it take to pull a crib from the market or some kind of a baby carriage or something? Here's 52 babies killed. Don't care. And that was right at the very beginning. I mean, look at who knows what it is right now. And how did they get away with all this stuff?

Well, they had a lot of accomplices, as a matter of fact, and people who are still bragging about doing it. This is the former CEO of YouTube, Susan Wajiki, who was bragging about the fact that they deleted more than a million videos. Some of those mine. When it comes to vaccines, vaccine hesitancy, videos that cause a public health risk, where do you want to see YouTube do better? Well, first of all, we've taken the, we've taken responsibility very seriously. It's been one of my top priorities. And with regard to COVID, you should be held responsible. And with regard to vaccines, that has been a top priority for us.

And we have, we have a number of different ways that we address that. So first of all, we want to make sure that if there's information that violates our policies, we came up with 10 different policies around COVID. Then if that's a violation of policies, then that's something that will remove. We removed over a million videos associated with COVID. Have you talked to the Biden administration at all about vaccine hesitancy or vaccine misinformation? Well, we did an event, actually, with the Biden administration, including President Biden himself, with a number of creators, Fauci as well.

I wonder if there's anything that you see in, you know, the way that anti-vaxxers behave on the platform. If there are any data or insights there that could be helpful to people understanding where they're coming from. I mean, we try to, we try to, these people make me want to throw up. You're responsible for the deaths of who knows how many people, because you withheld information from them. There is no such thing as misinformation.

There's information you missed. If it's false information, people can handle that. If it's false information, you can combat that with the truth. When you censor, you are a tyrant. You are a thief and a murderer. You're stealing people's lives.

If you don't kill them, you're stealing their help. These people disgust me. Yeah. So Pfizer said the allegations are baseless. Their censorship was baseless. They had 10 different things they sent it for. I think my video has probably checked all those boxes. And I'm proud of it.

I'll tell you what I think is true. I'll tell you what the information that you've missed, that they want to label as misinformation because they don't want you to hear it. Folks, it's not going to go away with artificial intelligence as RFKD. Jr. naively thinks that you believe. I don't think he believes. I don't think he's that naive. But he says, yeah, it's going to help us to get rid of these so-called experts. No, it will become the ultimate expert. And they will control what it says. They will decide what you're allowed to hear. They will decide what the truth is. This is the path to having one government

standard of quote-unquote truth. The ministry of truth. I think it's what Orwell called it. When they censored and lied to people, it's called the Ministry of Truth. And that was the role of Susan Wojiki at YouTube. You have blood on your hands, Susan. A lot of blood. Millions of people worldwide suffered and died because of your tyranny, because of your censorship. Free speech is the foundational thing.

That's why it's the First Amendment. She actually passed away in 2024. I believe of cancer. Did she? Yeah. Wasted by her own butard. Yeah. Yeah.

She probably suppressed all the information about alternatives to traditional cancer therapy as well as the turbo cancer. She seemingly got exactly. It's in God's hands, you know, I guess. But anyway, so Pfizer said these allegations are baseless. Then information about its vaccines have been accurate. And science-based. Well, how about that? Maybe they've got a new slogan that could start, right?

Trust the science. Trust Pfizer. Maybe they get Fauci to read it. And Dylan Mulvaney could be his nurse. Ready to inject you. I don't know. This is beyond ridiculous what we're seeing from these people. And, of course, Naomi Wolf has been at the center of this for a while.

She got some of the documents, and she published the Pfizer papers, Pfizer's crimes against. humanity. That's a book and released a lot of documents in 2023 and 2024. She said, she revealed serious adverse events among pregnant women and irreversible harms to reproductive health. Do you remember, maybe you maybe do remember when I talked about this back in 2021. You had some doctors who looked at studies that were done in Japan. And they said this, and one of was the Canadian doctor. I don't know if it was Dr. Amacus that revealed that.

He paid the price. Everybody paid the price for telling you the truth. That should never happen in science. And so anyway, there was a study showing that the biodistribution was not evenly spread throughout the body, but it was concentrating outside of the organ that filters that stuff. It was in the number two area that it went. It was in reproductive organs of both men and women that accumulated there. I don't think anything was by accident.

I think this was all by design. It's all about population control, depopulation, as well as monitoring people, and making sure that you prevent what they're doing, what they're saying. Florida resident who was seriously injured following her COVID-19 vaccination in 2021, welcomed it. She said injuries caused by the vaccine, quote, have received inadequate attention for years. Yeah, there's a reason for that.

The lawsuit seeks civil penalties of $10,000 for each violation of the state's consumer protection law and $15,000 for each violation involving an elderly or disabled person. Now, of course, these modest amounts are not even going to go to the people who are harmed by it. It'll go to the state. We're going to talk about crime and punishment coming up here. the death penalty that they failed to execute literally. Well, of course, when you damage the cattle,

the rest of the cows don't get compensated. The rancher does. That's right. Yeah. Yeah, that's right. We're just cattle, aren't we? But, you know, we don't have a system of compensation, do we? You pay the state.

If somebody harms me, they pay the state or they go do time in the prison. And then I pay to keep them housed in prison. It's not a very good system. As a matter of fact, you go back and look at the Moses. a law. It's like, oh, this eye for an eye and a tooth for tooth stuff. And it's like, well, actually, it's very sophisticated, especially when you look at the similar systems that were there at the time.

And, you know, it moderated the punishment. It also had issues there that if you had something that happened and it wasn't intentional, it was a different punishment than if you intentionally killed somebody. But there was also the key thing that is missing is that there was compensation for victims. That was the primary thing. It wasn't about just simply punishing somebody. It was about compensating the people had been hurt. We don't have any concept of that in our justice system.

The state doesn't do that. If you want compensation, you got to then take your own legal action in a lawsuit. So Florida is seeking to force Pfizer to return some of its profits and asking for a permanent injunction against further deceptive practices. May I don't stop lying. No stop it. It's like they've got a long rap sheet. And of course, they're not the only pharmaceutical company.

Well, I looked up to see, I thought that Pfizer had more convictions than anybody else. But I remember when we were adopting, we had somebody asked why we got out of the video business. And we said, well, we got out of the video business because of convictions. We wrote that in our piece there. And it was tied in the context to, you know, are becoming Christians. And so we had a lawyer who contacted us, and she said, I need to know about these convictions. She meant the other kind, but the kind that come when you don't have any convictions, like Johnson and Johnson, for example. They have the most in total fines.

But then there's Purdue Pharmaceutical, which had the largest single fine because they got involved in the opioid scandal. Of course, Johnson and Johnson, and giving people respiratory issues with baby powder for the longest. time. That's just one of their many fine products. Pfizer, of course, has the largest criminal fine, $1.3 billion. And they have the most federal convictions. However, Glaxo Smith-Kline has the most cumulative fines. They've paid $10 billion. So we've got a horse race going on here between Johnson and Johnson, Purdue pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Glaxo-SmithKline, GSK. This is one sick industry folks. And how do they do this? Well, they get away with it because they bribe the politicians. They bribe the media. And again, you know, this is when they talk about, well, we're going to

give even more money for violations involving an elderly or disabled person, which is kind of strange. Because a lot of times when you look at a medical lawsuit, they will take down the kind of compensation amounts because a person's elderly or in poor help otherwise. And so they'll say, well, maybe there's some contributing factors to that. They're actually going up for the elderly on this. But, of course, the elderly were targeted specifically for this. We all know that was a case. They wanted to get the Social Security rolls down.

According to the complaint, Pfizer engaged in deceptive and wide-ranging marketing campaign to drive consumer demand for its COVID-19 vaccine, overcome widespread public skepticism, and, quote, ensure windfall profits. This is coming from Children's Health Defense, this article. The emphasis on the purported safety of the vaccine. And, you know, if we're going to list some of the people who have culpability in this, somebody who told you how safe this was, somebody I used to work for. Every week, attenuated classic viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it.

Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks. Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, microwaved or radiated B, blah, blah, blah. Absolutely. That's why Trump is taking control. And of course, Alex has got his own billion dollar lawsuit, but he doesn't pay any of it.

I think Pfizer actually paid it. Where does that put him on that scale? I don't know. He doesn't pay it even when he loses his lawsuits. So, yeah, between 2020 and 2023, Pfizer's revenue exceeded $80 billion. $1. Borla got $102 million in compensation. I think Alex probably did about that well with the storable food stuff when he sold the pandemic panic at the early part of 2020. But again, it's all about the money, isn't it? When you look at the PEP Act, again, this is put in in 2005 by George W. Bush,

as they were creating the surveillance state. And this is the other shoe to drop with the 9-11 attack. So the issue with the PEP Act is that it may not extend to state-level consumer protection cases. This is what this is going to be a test case of in court. Because supposedly that was going to protect them against all this stuff. But I think Pfizer themselves understand that they have some liability for things outside of just, okay, the government comes in and says, we want this, give this to us, and we're going to run this out for people because there's this emergency situation. here. They were trying, and this was reported by Stat News, stat news is one of the biggest pharmaceutical trade publications.

And if you go back when this thing was rolling out and they were ready to put it out in different places, Pfizer was actually blackmailing three Latin American countries. Two of them came to terms with Pfizer. Another one did not, and they were the ones who blew the whistle on it. and I've forgot now which the three countries were, but Pfizer wanted protection against liability that was due to manufacturing defects and to fraud. They knew that they had liability for those things. And those other countries, they were saying, hey, this is an emergency.

Give us what you got. We'll take it and hold you harmless. But not if you are careless about this and you have negligence in terms of the way you manufacture it or if there is deliberate. fraud involved. And it was a really strange case because they were demanding that these countries indemnify them by giving them insurance in terms of real estate and things that they held outside of their own country. So they would be able to go to a third party country and say, well, that belongs to us now because of, you know, blah, blah, blah.

But so we've had a couple of states that have pushed back against us. Texas have already got lawsuits against Pfizer and similar claims to Florida's that basically it was fraud and going to consumer protection laws. And there were rumors that it was going to happen in Oklahoma. I'm sorry, not Oklahoma. It's Kansas and Texas have it. There are rumors that Utah, Mississippi, and Louisiana were also going to be suing Pfizer, but they didn't.

Those were false rumors. Ray Flores at Children's Health Defense, an attorney there, said he'd like to see state attorney's general pressure U.S. Health Secretary RFK Jr. To flex his muscles, yeah, his, he's in pretty good physical shape, except when it comes to his muscles that he uses as head of HHS. Those have basically atrophied and died. So he wants to get RFK Jr. to stop the PEP Act's liability.

shield for COVID-19 vaccines. And again, who could possibly object to that, right? Because, you know, as Pfizer going, or Moderna, are they going to object to this? Because they've been telling everybody it's so safe. I mean, you don't need to have a liability shield for that if it's so safe, do you? Except that they know that it's not safe. And that's one of the reasons why they pushed it on children, if you remember. When this all happened, they were saying, well, there's no cases of the

this imaginary pandemic. There's no cases of babies or young children. It's all about the elderly. And that was very suspicious. We had two weeks' worth of data out of Italy before Trump declared the pandemic and that that fateful Friday the 13th. And what we saw there was it was the deaths that they'd had in Italy. And there weren't that many.

We're all average age of over-life expectancy, like one or two years past average life expectancy. And on average, they had two and a half comorbidities. In other words, there were other things that could have killed them and might have killed them. But this is where we saw first the whole idea that you die with a test, not necessarily from a disease, but you die with a positive test. We don't say that that disease killed you, but you just had a positive test and you died. Therefore, that's what it is. Just like the motorcycle, but a fatal accident that happened.

and that was in Houston. And he put it down, the coroner put it down, it's COVID. People called him out and he said, well, it could have been COVID. Yeah, they'll grab it in anything, won't they? So Florida is accusing them of a visor of deception and profiteering. I think they misspelled racketeering. That's really what it is, folks. It's not just profiteering.

This is organized crime, organized at the highest, level organized out of Washington. The complaint in Florida begins with one of Borla's most memorable attacks on vaccine critics and skeptics. He said, quote, those people are criminals. Well, legendary case of projection, isn't it? Calling people what you are. Borla made the remark November 2021 while discussing people who spread what he called vaccine

misinformation again, hence YouTube, taking down embraces. about a million videos being taken down. And by the way, this is how these same people, our greatest industry that is run by people from our greatest ally, this is the same way they handle genocide, isn't it? They take your videos down. They punish your free speech. They don't want to debate it.

They don't want to show the truth. They want the truth to be taken down. They can't handle the truth, right? The lawsuit also points to Pfizer's unannounced rat studies, which showed severe fertility and pregnancy complications. Well, folks, the rats that you need to be studying are the pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna and the rats in Washington that they control.

That's the only rat study you need to know. You need to know where these people are coming from. In February 28, 2021, Pfizer also had reports involving, as I said before, 458 pregnant women. They found that more than half of those pregnant women, 248, 54%, had reported an adverse event from the so-called COVID-19 vaccine. More than 10%, 52 of them, who received that vaccine, the Trump shot, let's just call that. During these pregnancies reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination.

Don't ever call Donald Trump pro-life around me. Please don't do that. I can't stand the ignorance that is out there as well as the idolatry. He is not pro-informed consent. He is not pro-informed consent. He is not pro-public health or individual health. Pfizer executives repeatedly encouraged vaccination as a way to protect others in December 2020. Borla said, I repeat, once more, this choice is not to vaccinate will not only affect your health and your life. Unfortunately, it will affect the lives of others and likely the lives.

of people you love the most who are the people that usually you are in contact with. And he had similar statements. So that was December of 2020, December 2021, he was still saying the same thing. He said that the Trump shots and the Trump boosters remain the best course of action to prevent the spread of the legendary pandemic. Now, of course, he doesn't call him the Trump shots and Trump boosters. Donald Trump does. I got so many of the Magatards so angry with me because they kept calling him the Trump shot. But he called it the Trump shot. I'm the father of the vaccine, he said over and over again. He's proud of that. Give him credit for it. Pfizer's original clinical trial did not test with a vaccination prevented person to person transmission.

Again, the FDA is always eager to punish people if they make false or untested claims, aren't they? I mean, that's one of the key things. Oh, you can't say that because you haven't proving it with a double-blind test. So you can't make that claim about that supplement or that vitamin or that food or this or that. You have to run a test. And if you say something without running those tests, oh, we're going to come after you criminally. And yet Pfizer's out there saying, hey, we prevent person-to-person spread. Well, if it's a mythological disease, then, of course, I guess you can. And I really do think that's what it was. And like I said, I had the interview on Friday with Dennis Rancourt, he said so much of that stuff that was there really was

bacterial pneumonia and it was exacerbated by the ventilators. That is something that is always around, something that is very dangerous. And of course, if you got a mask, that is going, bacterial pneumonia frequently happens because people respirate their own saliva. What do you think is happening with a mask? You think that is increasing it? I mean, we can see that just to see it in the acne on people's faces when they were wearing those masks, just how unsanitary they were. And of course, leaving those things on all day,

violated all the OSHA rules that said they would mandate it in some dusty environments. Like, if you're cleaning up 9-11 debris, it was mandated to have OSHA, but they waved that away. And a lot of people died from respiratory illness because of Rudy's haste to get that all cleaned up. But they mandated in some areas, but said you can't wear it for more than 20 minutes. Speaking of minutes, we'll be right back, folks. You're listening to the David Knight Show. The whole process saying he's going to have an early vaccine from a company that doesn't make one that is so dangerous or that doesn't change our DNA. And I'm not even endorsing what Trump's doing, but I understand what he's doing.

After nine years, you know what I realize? Ignorance is bliss. We're combining all of these amazing strengths for the most aggressive vaccine project in history. There's never been a vaccine project anywhere in history like this. I went and looked up the ones that Trump's looking at. They're very weak, attenuated, classic viruses. There's never been a vaccine project anywhere in history like this. Classic viruses.

I don't want to be rich. You know, someone important. Like an actor. I went and looked up the ones that Trump's looking at. Trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks. I have a very good relationship with Dr. Fauci. You know, it's sort of interesting. We've listened to Dr. Fauci.

Because remember, he's working for this administration. Gates goes, trust my. vaccine but don't trust the CDC's vaccine. I give Dr. Pouchy a lot of credit. He's a good man. I like Dr. Fouchy a lot, just so you understand. Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, you know, microwaved or radiated, COVID deal?

Absolutely. Ignorance is bliss. Yeah, that's ignorance is bliss, I guess. I guess that explains why I've been feeling the way I've been feeling for the last few years. I've seen a lot of blissfully ignorant people. people and I've been watching them walk off of a cliff because they've been following the pied pipers. So this is, you know, when we look at it, where do they come up with this stuff, by the way?

You know, they did tests on rats. They saw how harmful it was and they went ahead with it anyway. They knew about the VERS database. They went ahead with it anyway. They didn't do any tests to say, well, we don't, how are you going to test to see if spreads of mythological disease. And that's what I think it was. I think they, when you look at the,

when you look at the extra deaths, they were happening in the hospitals. The extra deaths were happening because of things like RIMdesivir and the ventilators. And because they kept people who were very sick out of the hospital so they could make a bonus that Trump was giving them. So we saw a slight uptake in 2020, but then we saw a huge explosion once the vaccines went out.

That's why I say the bioweapon is the vaccine. don't get drawn into all this stuff about gain of function research and everything Wuhan lab forget about that that's not the issue that was something worth looking at one point in time and it is something that we should stop and this is at the center of what's going on in this supposedly this Russian plague thing but again it's not contagion that you need to worry about it's the government that you need to worry about so Florida is arguing that Pfizer used protection of others as a powerful sales message.

Well, yes, of course they did. It was in the summer of 2020 that Yale study came out where they said they had, they tried and it was about 12 or 15 different arguments that they would give people to make. And that was one of them. It's going to kill your loved ones who you're the closest to. If you don't get it, you're going to spread. If you don't get the vaccine, you're going to spread this to other people. put a guilt trip on them.

And they actually sold that to pastors. You had people like Robert Jeffress, this Trumpster, who's got this big Baptist church in Dallas. He worked with Curtis Chang, who was getting a lot of money. You know, you had the advertising, the federally funded advertising campaign. Then they put out PSAs and stuff like. It's $250 million campaign from the ad council. The people have done things in the past that were ubiquitous,

like Smokey the bear, right? Or smoky bear. I don't know if it's the bear or smoky bear. Anyway, I think it's smoky the bear. Yeah. Only you can prevent forest fires, right? That was drilled into our heads. And yet that was nothing compared to this massive propaganda campaign that Trump funded. And so they had wargamed the different arguments that they were going to use to people. All of them lies about this stuff.

And then they started feeding that to people through the pulpits. seeing some of the same types of strategies that we see from our greatest ally. Again, this type of lies and using people's trust in terms of these big megachurches, like Robert Jeffries, and people like Al Moeller making the same arguments. It was pretty amazing to see this. Some of the big dogs in the Christian community, and you understand that when you want to have a gigantic, when your goal is to have as much reach and to be an influencer,

one of the things that happens is you give up on the truth. People don't want to hear the truth, and the people who are spreading lies will punish you. We're telling the truth. So when you try to explain that their fear could stand in the way of protecting their loved ones, I think this is an argument that mostly works. Well, he knew that. That's Al Borla.

and he knew that because Yale had already done the study. And then you see these people who were passing the stuff along, they were giving the talking points out verbatim. I mean, Rush Limbaugh used to talk about how they had talking points for the left. They put these things out there. That's exactly how this worked. Talking points for the left and for the right throughout this pandemic. And so these big megachurch pastors working for the genocide as well.

So the state also attacked the Florida state and the lawsuit attacks Pfizer's broader competitive conduct. They accuse Pfizer and its allies of pressuring social media companies to suppress critics. You notice what the Florida lawsuit does not question them on. They talk about how they pressured social media. They don't talk about how they pressured mainstream media. You know, like Fox? Because these are Republicans. They want to get on Fox.

They don't want to criticize Fox. The only Republican who criticizes Fox is going to be Trump because his ego is so offended. And so he'll criticize him. And other Republicans will criticize that. Fox takes that coin just like the rest of them do. Florida points to Pfizer's sharp increase and the vaccine's commercial price also in 2023. So they put it out. And then after a couple of years of poisoning and killing people, instead of it being banned, they jacked the price up.

tremendously. And so they're looking, the state of Florida is looking to disgorge profits, they said. I'm sorry, that's just not enough. There should be criminal actions taken for these executives. And it was RFK Jr. when he was talking about climate thing. And she was on the wrong side of that McGuffin. And he said, we need to have these guys locked up, right? The people running think tanks, supposing his climate alarmism. And yet he said, no, no, no, I wasn't talking about the people. I was talking about the corporations that are out there. Well, the corporations should be given the death penalty.

That would disband these crooked corporations. They're not about to do that. Too much money involved. They paid off all the right people. But the executives definitely should be going to jail. But they're not going to do that either. Instead, there's going to be a small fine, you know, $10,000. for ruining the life or killing somebody, 15,000 if the person is elderly.

Florida is not bringing a federal claim. They are pursuing Pfizer under state consumer protection law. In December 2024, the then-Secretary of HHS, Javier Bicera, extended the COVID Declaration through December 31st, 2029. Think about that. We are still under COVID declaration until the end of 2029. You know, we were more than three years out. How could he extend an emergency that far in advance?

That should tell you what this is all about. As a matter of fact, I said this from the very beginning. I said, if you look at the HHS secretary that Trump put in, he put in a pharmaceutical executive, Alex Azar, former CEO of Eli Lilly. And then when Biden got ready to come in, he put in the guy who was a lawyer. Javier Vassar had no experience in health at all.

But he was a lawyer and a politician. He had been the Attorney General in California, followed Lala Harris. And I said at the time, so Trump puts in a pharmaceutical guy because he's got to build the hype. Tell everybody this is a real pandemic, right? And then Biden is going to weaponize it with his mandates and his lawyer as head of HHS. And that's exactly what he did. extended it out another five years from December 2024. Extended the emergency out for five years.

That is unconscionable. And then when you look at it, RFK Jr. could remove that, but he's not going to do it. As a matter of fact, he has since ended separate COVID emergency use declarations, but he denounced the law in 2023 as protecting vaccine makers from accountability for what he called mass murder. It is mass murder. When are you going to hold people accountable for this? Well, if you start to hold people accountable for this as murder, what happens to

backstady, the father of the vaccine, Donald Trump? That becomes the big issue, doesn't it? And so, again, it's all about the power, isn't it? Here's one person who was there under RFK Jr. Tracy Beth, I think her name, I don't know how to pronounce her last name. It's just from the Netherlands, and it's got a slash through the O, so I freak out with that. Hogue, I guess. Hogue, she's a physician and research scientist. It cost her her positions of the FDA and the University of California, Davis, and she was censored, silenced on NPR. She's an

epidemiologist and a sports physician. She's somebody who came from the Netherlands, and she was looking at it. She said, I didn't realize how people were self-censoring here. She said, I just kind of walked into this thing. And I didn't realize, she didn't realize she was putting her head in the news when she spoke out about it. Because even in Europe where they are very antagonistic to free speech in so many different areas, they didn't have these kinds of restrictions on scientific research. We've seen it's even worse. It's bad there, but it's not as bad as it is here in America.

Her research challenged policies on school closures, masking and the vaccines. So she lost her position at University of California, Davis. She was dropped from an NPR interview, and then she was fired from RFK Jr.'s FDA. She said, you have to be objective when you're doing scientific studies. Otherwise, you just shouldn't do them. It's pointless if you're not willing to be objective. She said, I didn't realize the jeopardy I was putting myself in, though. She had published 30 to 40 papers on transmission. One study found little evidence of COVID-19 transmission among children in Wisconsin schools,

another examined myocarditis risk and boys after their second Pfizer shot, found the risks outweighed the benefits. Well, that should have been a pretty short study. There's not any benefits. It doesn't prevent it. It doesn't prevent transmission of it, whatever it is, which I think, again, was not a virus. I think it was bacterial pneumonia.

Anyway, people were afraid for their. careers. She said, I was actually blessed with having recently moved from Denmark. I didn't realize the jeopardy I was putting myself in doing these sorts of studies. So the university refused to renew her voluntary position in 2022 after the European Journal of Clinical Investigation published her study. So again, she has a study published in Europe and then in America, they censor her. And of course, this is the University of California at Davis. I remember the University of California at Berkeley was back during the Vietnam War when they had something. they wanted to say that wasn't welcome by the Nixon administration. They became a bastion of

supporters of free speech. But now the shoe is on the other foot, isn't it? They're just as bad censorship as anybody. NPR also dropped an interview with her for all things considered. They did a pre-interview discussion with her. And she told them what she thought, that the masks don't work. And so then they called her back and said, well, sorry, I don't think we're going to be interviewing you. They carefully screened what they're going to do. In 2022, she and her colleagues conducted a follow-up analysis for the CDC on the mask mandates.

Her analysis used a larger data set, longer time period, and reached the opposite conclusion of the CDC in terms of mask mandates and COVID-19 transmission. And so the CDC would not publish it. Surprise, surprise. She said, they have. a scientific agenda. As soon as you have a scientific agenda, science has been thrown out the window. Science doesn't have an agenda other than to find the truth. That's why it's not a scientific agenda. It's just an agenda. That is, to say, scientific agenda is an oxymoron.

She said 5% of the studies found that masks were connected to higher infection rates, right? because it's dirty. It's unsanitary. People are going to be getting sick. They're going to be getting bacterial pneumonia at a higher rate. She said, and so why are we demonizing people looking into this or looking into anything? Why are we not allowed to question what we're told? You should question authority, especially when the authorities get authoritarian, especially when the authorities tell you that you don't have free speech anymore and you don't have a free press and you got somebody like Trump who on every opportunity

is looking at a way to punish people but he doesn't like what they have to say. She said she reviewed the VERS reports, the vaccine adverse events reporting system. She found investigations involving medical records and autopsies had already been conducted. She said, my question at the time was, why are these not being made public?

Well, we did make them public. And then we got taken down. Those videos got taken down. And the people who were getting massive amounts of money from the pharmaceutical companies didn't do those studies at all, that do those stories at all, I should say. It's truly amazing how the system works so efficiently together. If you try to talk to someone about the dangers of the vaccine, they go, oh, well, there's no studies about it. you know, it's not on the TV because NPR won't put this person on or any other news source will reject them. Then you say, well, they did studies.

Like, oh, well, the studies weren't accepted. And it's just this continual stair step. And you're the only person who's complaining about this, right? That's the other part of it is to isolate you, not just socially, but mentally and intellectually, to think that you're the only person who sees these glaring inconsistencies and illogical conclusions that are out there. In May, just days after FDA Commissioner Marty McCarrie resigned, she said she arrived at work to find media reports claiming that she had resigned also, something she said she knew nothing about. FDA lawyers later did ask her to resign, but she refused to sign the letter. She was subsequently locked out of the agency's system and escorted from the building.

She said she never received a performance-based explanation for her termination. She also said the person identified as the author of her termination memo, later denied writing it, or seeing it. According to her, agency lawyers told her the order came from way above my pay grade. This is what I found when I contacted the people at PayPal and Vimo. Why have I been taking it? No reason given.

Just orders from above. Talk to a guy for two hours about that. So she also discussed a new drug that's called Tavneos, manufactured by MGen. It's a type of drug for blood vessel inflammation. So while she was there at the FDA, she raised concerns that the pivotal clinical trial used to approve the drug had included manipulated data.

According to her, at least eight deaths have been attributed to the drug because of liver injury. The New England Journal of Medicine later retracted the paper detailing the trial. The European regulators withdrew the drug, authorization, yet here in America, if you got somebody in the FDA that complains about this, they get fired. They have withdrawn the drugs authorization in Europe.

Tavnios remains available in the U.S. If you have somebody, if you are a loved one, have a problem with that. I sound like one of these ambulance chasing lawyers, right? But you may want to take a look at the medication that you or your loved ones are having and understand this is pretty suspect. The media barely covered it. There's just no reporting on this, she said. People have died taking this drug.

We asked for them to withdraw it from the market, and the media is just totally silent. Well, they've been paid to be silent. Brought to you by Pfizer. Yeah. They've been bribed into silence or in agreement, just like the Zionist occupied government has everywhere on one issue after the other.

She said there was the depressing thing. She said is there's no real learning in the end. If anything, we just became dumber and more malleable, I would say. The Overton window has been broken. And we've thrown the Bill of Rights has been defenestrated right out that window. Once the government decided that this is what we have to do, they just kept digging in, even though the data didn't support it. Well, the government decided that was what we had to do.

two months before 9-11. And that's, they've been practicing how they're going to twist people's arms and pull the mask not over our face, but over our eyes as well. Vaccinated kids, meanwhile, in terms of just general vaccination, vaccinated kids have significantly higher odds of developing multiple chronic chronic health conditions. This is a new study that's just come out. 60% more likely to suffer recurrent respiratory disease. In general, the risk increased in the vaccinated group based on the increasing number of vaccines.

They said that developmental delay was one of the things that they saw as well as strep infection, especially with young girls. Strep infection was a huge increase. 240% more if the kids were vaccinated on the schedule the government wants to. vaccinated on, developmental delay did not increase significantly in the overall cohort, but was significantly elevated in the highest vaccine quartile, which received over 10 vaccine doses, which is what the schedule is. They reported a 40% higher odds of experiencing developmental delay for the children who were given a lot of vaccines at an early age. This is before 13 months.

significantly elevated odds of strep throat, ear infection, rhinitis, respiratory disease compared to unvaccinated children. This is a very large study. 6,200 kids, 3,800 of them unvaccinated, and they compared the vaccinated to the unvaccinated. The fact that kids received at least one vaccine before 13 months were more often coded for several common infections and respiratory diagnoses suggests an effect on the immune. system. Well, that is the whole point of the adjuvants, isn't it? They put things in there to irritate the immune system. And when you do that to very, very young kids, sometimes it sets off a

chain reaction. They cannot be controlled. So the pharma lobby spent a record $456 million last year on lobbying with no signs of slowing down. But that pales in comparison to the over $730 million that the state of Israel is using for propaganda and for buying politicians. Here's an example. Here's TPUSA. This is an interview guy is having with a Jewish guy. And he's hectoring him over, well, you know, don't you have more Jews and TPUSA and everything? And can you replace Christians with Jews?

I'd be willing to give you money to do that. Listen to this guy and how he responds at TPUSA. Is there a place for Jews? in TPUSA. And what is that place? Yeah, we, I mean, we all, a bunch of our chapters have a number of Jewish students. Just depends on, you know, the chapter. Some of our best chapters.

Larger Jewish. All of our events have lots of Jewish students at it. Is there a possibility? Is there a place? Have you guys ever considered having a division to have, use the TPSA model, have TPSA schools that are also Jewish instead of Christian? Because I'm telling you right now, if that, if you say, said yes to that right now, we would probably have funding from different people of it in a month.

Yeah, I mean, we've, I don't think we've ever thought about it. I thought about it. Yeah, but hey, now that you mentioned it, let's do that, because I can be bought. And this is the way they operate, folks. It's the way the companies operate. It's the way the Israeli government operates. That's the way the Zionists operate. Except they got a bigger budget than the pharmaceutical companies.

$456 million is what the pharmaceuticals. companies got, they've got over 700 million state of Israel lobbying expenses in 2025, up 16.7% from 2024. And that's just lobbying. That's not counting the advertising money that they're using, the money that they're throwing at mainstream media, even at the podcasters that are out there. So it is a big business, isn't it? The group that is basically doing the the lobbying for them is a group called P-H-R-M-A. Pharma, they should have just dropped the P and kept the A, call it H-R-M-A, because that's really what they do.

Farma's record spending bucked the overall trend in which some of Washington's biggest spenders, like the Chamber of Commerce or the National Association of Realtors, cut back from their 2024 lobbying expenditures in 2025, but pharmaceutical industry and Israel doubles down, don't they? they've got a lot to overcome. Do big pharma, does big pharma pressure on the Trump administration? Was there pressure to oust health officials? That's the question.

Well, it's not really a question. We can see the results of this. In April interview, RFK Jr. said, then FDA commissioner, Marty McCarrie, made the correct decision in rejecting a drug. They said, everybody goes after him because the pharmaceutical industry is so powerful, he said. During a February interview with a podcast, Theo Vaughan, Kennedy said the FDA was owned by Big Pharma and Big Food, and Marty McCarrie has changed that now.

Well, that was in February. By May, he was out. As were other key FDA figures, Tracy Beth Hogue that I mentioned earlier, who served as the agency's top drug regulator, as well as Vene Prasad, who resigned from the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation Research in April for the second time. farmer pressure may have led to his first resignation last year and also to the second one. He had signed off on the rejection of Moderna's MRNA flu vaccine two months earlier. However, within two weeks, the FDA accepted Moderna's application over his rejection.

So two weeks after he rejects it, they accept it anyway. Two months after he rejects it, he's rejected. In June, an FDA advisory committee unanimously approved the shot. They have, just like they're taking over Congress, they have taken over all these regulatory agencies. So that brings us then to measles. Pennsylvania, they say, is nearing 1,000 measles cases. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Well, no, actually, probably not. It is a fear campaign. That is absolutely for sure. when I talked to Dennis Rankwart on Friday, one of the things he was talking about was he said, you know, when you look at the spread of the so-called pandemic, he said it doesn't follow what you would expect if it was something that was contagious. The geotemporal spread was not that at all. It would pop up here and then it would pop up somewhere else. They weren't connected to each other. And that is really kind of what we're seeing in Pennsylvania as well. It is a political disease.

As a matter of fact, understand these are cases, they say. And we don't even know if they're cases. We don't even know if they diagnose this properly. So the state's reported five measles associated deaths. And there is an ongoing dispute between the governor there, Shapiro, who prides himself on being the state that has more pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturing there than any other state. He's talked about that. talking about how he wants to increase that.

I wonder if that has anything to do with this. RFK Jr. definitely thinks that it does, and I agree with him. So when you look at the so-called death toll from this, first of all, they say five deaths. I remember the first two were deaths that happened in one area where the coroner said, no, we didn't have any deaths here with that. I don't know what they're talking about. It came from the state, and the people were there on the ground,

the coroner said no. That's not the case. Then they come back and they say, well, these are measles associated deaths. We had a PCR test. And that came back positive for measles. And this person subsequently died. Therefore, we're going to say it was measles. And that's what they're still doing.

They'd say they got five cases of measles associated deaths. Let's say that measles actually caused that. What would that say the case fatality rate would be five people out of 1,000, one half of one percent? Is that something you should be afraid of? And when we look at the population of Pennsylvania, it's one of our most popular states, 13 million people,

and they've only been able to identify this with a PCR magnifier with a thousand people out of 13 million? I'll tell you, folks, they work really hard to get you scared, don't they? Don't be afraid. Don't be afraid at all. We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds.

It's the David Knight Show. Well, I've got to say their fear campaign actually is working. They're bragging about the fact typically in a month they get about 25 MMR vaccine, 25,000 doses of MMR. And after their fear campaign, they saw it go up in August to 49,000. And then in September, 53,000. So more than 100% increase, more than doubled. So the fear campaign is working. Also, presumably, these are people that took it previously as well.

Chances are if the propaganda hasn't worked on you yet, it's not going to work now. People who don't vaccinate are kind of locked in and people who do vaccinate are kind of locked into their positions at this point. I better go get it again. This is probably a second and third dose for these people just like, well, I better go get it again. Yeah, this idea of giving people multiple doses for the same disease, just, it's one of the things that put me off against the whole quote unquote science of urology. It's like,

well, according to your theory, you're training my immune system. The immune system doesn't forget. We know that if somebody's had a disease, they have immunity to it in the future. And so that means that your vaccines don't work. You're admitting that they don't work when you keep giving them over and over again.

And then, of course, what you get are multiple doses of these adjuvants, things and preservatives and other chemicals that are in there. But when you stop and think about it, again, 1,000 cases that they were able to identify with a PCR test and are they using the same magnification that they used for COVID? They doubled it 40 times, 2 to the 40th power, over a trillion times magnification. That's why Kerry Mullis said, you can find anything with a PCR test. You can't use it for diagnosis because you can multiply it so high. You can find any signature that you're looking for.

anything. And you look at it, 13 million people, they got a thousand cases. Okay, so your chances are one out of 13,000 that you're going to come down with this, even enough to trigger a PCR test, not enough to make you sick if it is something that makes you sick. And so then that brings us to Russia. The White House is now on high alert, and they are assessing their options. You better assess your options if Trump tries to pull this again on you. As plague breaks out in Russia, hundreds of people put into quarantine hospitals. You see, we're not the only people who are playing this game according to these stupid rules. There's only one person who died. She was somebody who was working in a lab and supposedly had an accident in the lab. Somebody who works in these

labs says, I'm not buying it. They're saying that there was a broken ball. He says, you don't work in those labs unless you got a biosafety suit on. Well, of course, we've seen in the past the expose that was done by Allison Young, USA Today in 2014, talking about these bio-weapon labs, many of them being run by in and around universities all over the country here in America. But she said they've been very shoddy in terms of control. They've let diseased animals out. And of course, you know, if you've got a bacterial disease or something, you can spread that around. And they've had a lot of accidents where they exposed people to things that they had made very deadly. That's the whole point of these things.

They are basically there to create bio-weapons. But the worst bioweapon was the vaccine. The White House, however, is monitoring a supposed plague outbreak in Russia. It's not a plague outbreak. She is the only person who got sick. She got sick and died, 28-year-old woman who was working there. No one else has gotten sick or died. They have isolated 200 people that they figure were in contact with her,

but it doesn't say that any of them are sick. The Trump administration told Axios on Sunday that the administration is, quote, aware, monitoring the outbreak, and assessing options. Well, again, your options are to not let these criminals get away with this a second time. Yeah, please don't let them get away. way with it. As a matter of fact, listen to this, you know, the rules of what happened in the hospital, which is really what was responsible for the excess deaths in 2020. The rules that happen in the hospital we've seen because Ron Johnson's hearing. Here's another person, a widow,

talking about what happened to her husband in the hospital. He was adamant that he did not want to be intubated. But at 1230 a.m., dead of night on November 21st, the hospital staff allowed him to FaceTime with me. He told me that they had strongly pressured him and convinced him of the need to be intubated. Post-procedure, he could no longer communicate with family members or advocate for himself. That was the last time I heard his voice was that night. During his hospitalization, Keith's condition progressively worsened as more aggressive interventions were introduced. It seemed like each solution to a problem just created an addition.

problem. The hospital continued to deny our right to give Keith Ivermectin until Sunday evening December 5th, 21. On Tuesday, December 7th, a friend sent me a text. It was a screenshot from someone that worked at the hospital. And this is what it said, and I quote, so between you and I, as long as my name isn't brought into this, I fear that the hospital will omit things to help this man survive. to try and prove that the ivermectin doesn't work i fear the retribution i would watch him like a hulk if i were the wife i think she meant to say hawk but i would watch him like a hulk if i were the wife at this point i don't think the docks will try as hard they are pissed that she has defied them anyone who dares cross them is going to burn in their eyes you can repeat that but keep my name out of it end quote on december 12th he

died. And he was one of the few cases that Ralph 1 ended in death. My husband entered that hospital alive, alert, and expecting medical treatment, and he never returned home. His blood work upon intake proved that he had healthy organs. His final blood work showed evidence of renal and liver failure. His death devastated our family, and it changed our lives. And it changed our lives forever. So I'm submitting this statement so that Keith's story and the circumstances surrounding his hospitalization and death are preserved in the official record. Yeah, and the Ralph that she's referring to who won, that's a lawyer, who had a couple

hundred cases and he won the right for somebody to try Ivermectin, which had been around forever. I mean, you have a situation when the end. understand what the safety profile is of something, and it's been around for me decades, and they would typically allow you to use it for off-label use. But no, that was prohibited. You could not have any of that stuff. Now, let me just say, and I'll say this now in the future, every time I talk about ivermectin, Dr. Michael Yaden, who was a respiratory specialist, head chief scientist at Pfizer for a while before he quit, said that he was made aware of some studies that

show that Ivermectin can be very deleterious to, deleterious to fertility. So he said, be aware of that. I mean, if you're in a situation, it's a life or death situation. If you have cancer or something like that, even regardless of your age or whether you're planning on having kids, you would probably, that would overrule those concerns. But it's something to be aware of because some people are taking it out there as a prophylactic to prevent this. and you may want to double think that.

The thing is, just all these, every single drug has side effects. What I advocate is that you should be aware of these side effects, and if you want to take them, you should be allowed to. That's right. You should go in with eyes open, though. They shouldn't be allowed to obfuscate and hide these things and pretend, oh, this is totally safe. This is fine.

It's a wonder drug. It's a cure for everything. That's right. There is no such drug. All of these things have issues. Well, and that's why I mentioned it because for a long time, you know, because Ivermectin has been so effective on so many different things. And it has a pretty good safety profile,

except for this issue that's now been brought up in terms of fertility, that I just want to pass that on because a lot of people are saying, hey, there's no issues at all with that. There was no issues in terms of using it, allowing people to try it when they're in a life and death situation, certainly not. Anyway, this lawyer won 70 out of cases out of, you know, 250 or so that he had 240, something like that.

But he had about 150 or 60 cases that he lost. Every single one of those persons died. They tried to get ivermectin to. Of the 72 cases that he won, 70 of the 72 survived. Those other two, this woman's husband and others, were so badly damaged by the ventilator that they could not survive. but it helped 70 out of 72 people. Do you think you got any pharmaceutical drugs that do that on any other thing?

I don't think so. And so in this particular case in Russia, this is a woman who told the medical staff she had accidentally broken a test tube that was holding live bacteria. They put her on a ventilator and she died two days later. Again, did she die from the ventilator? three hospitals in the region have been placed under secure measures with mask mandates in place. This is Russia. You see, every Western government, even Russia, is going through all this superstitious nonsense.

And it is superstitious. Maybe Fauci should tell us that we all get a knock on wood if we have been exposed to something. That is, this is, don't walk under ladders, wear a mask and knock on wood. So this plague, this pneumonic plague, causes a severe lung infection. Fatalities from pneumonic plague dropped to about 17% if treated with antibiotics within the first 24 hours of infection. However, if left untreated, it is almost always fatal. And so that's where we are with this. So in response to this, you had a guy who was a senior Russian epidemiologist.

And he said, I'm not buying this broken test tube explanation. He told that to the Moscow Times. He said, it's laughable. Somebody working at the Anti-Plaug Institute wears a protective anti-plague suit. If you break a test tube, the likelihood of infection is actually very low. In short, it doesn't matter to the general public. They'll believe the broken test tube story, just like they'll believe all the stories about mask mandates and all the rest of this stuff.

Well, let's take a look at, um, it's the case that happened here in Tennessee. and they were saying it was the first execution of a woman prisoner in 200 years, and they botched it, and it's had coverage internationally. And I just wonder, when we look at this, why are people so focused on the death of a convicted killer? And really not too concerned about the family or about the victim or what they actually did in terms of getting that case.

Most of these high-profile cases, you don't have a killer who is protesting that they're innocent. Here's an example. This is kind of on the other side of this. This is a killer whose sentence was thrown out after an AI clip of the victim speaking from beyond the grave, supposedly, right? So this is just, it's not real. It was artificial intelligence. And the family put this video together.

They had AI use a source video of the victim. And they put it together, and they talked about how, you know, hey, in the past, you know, we could have probably been friends. And, you know, I don't hold any grudges, and I'm a strong Christian, and all the rest of this stuff. This is some of the things that said to Gabriel Hercasitas, the man who shot me. It's a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances, said the AI version of the victim in court. In another life, we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness and a God who forgivable.

gives. I always have and I still do, said the AI version of him. So wearing the same clothes that they had in the picture, of course. At the time of the Senate seeing the judge who oversaw the case, Todd Lang, seemed to appreciate the use of AI. He said, I loved that AI. Thank you for that. As angry as you are, as justifiably angry as the family is, I heard the forgiveness. I feel that that was genuine. Well, it wasn't. genuine. It was A.I. And so now, the situation has been reviewed by others and said, this judge's judgment was clouded when he was,

he didn't come up with the guilty verdict. That was something that was done by the jury, and that's not been overturned. He was doing the sentencing. And he gave the guy a very stiff sentence for the kind of homicide that it was. It was a road rage confrontation, gave him 10 and a half years behind bars. His legal team has now appealed, arguing the trial judge should not have allowed an AI video of the victim to play in court ahead of the sentencing. And again, this says something about AI, doesn't it? People get taken in by it. And again, I heard the forgiveness. I feel that that was genuine. No, it's called artificial intelligence. Genuine intelligence. So the sentencing has been vacated.

not the guilty finding that is still there. They are going to do a different sentencing, though. But when I looked at all this, I thought, yeah, but what about the victim's family? Do we ever hear anything about that? It's never really considered, and it's certainly, I haven't heard anything really about it in the Tennessee case. There was one report in a Tennessee paper that went back and talked about the actual crime, the actual murder that this woman did, and it is really heinous. I mean, this person before her execution, she needs an exorcism.

Quite frankly, you go back and look at the story of this case. So this is a rigged thing here that he thought was genuine and really moved him in terms of sympathy. But this botched execution of this woman here in Tennessee caused the chief of the prisons to step down. The governor asked for his resignation. Was he the one that was there trying to put the needle in her arm? No, I don't get it. See, that's the whole thing.

It's like the bottom line is they've done everything they can to save this woman after trying to kill her. Reason points that out. They said, this is kind of strange when he stopped and think about it. You know, the state as executioner. You think this is the one thing the government seems to be good at is killing its citizens. And yet when it comes to a, you know, out-and-out murderer, someone we know did it in a very horrific fashion. They just can't seem to get the job done. That's right.

Yeah, they made at least seven attempts to kill her by lethal injection. They should have consulted with Trump and Fauci. They know how to kill people. Yeah, I was going to say, their numbers are shocking. And, of course, one bullet would have done it and could still do it. She is on a ventilator now. They're doing every kind of extraordinary measure they can to try to keep her alive after they had decided that she needed to be killed. She was convicted of first-degree murder after she and her boyfriend and another accomplice lured the victim.

a fellow student to an isolated area near the University of Tennessee Agricultural Campus, where Pike, the murderer, brutally beat her and cut her throat. That's not the worst of it. She was 18 years old when she committed this crime, and she boasted about it. Let me give you some more gruesome details. She forced her victim to remove her blouse, then beat and kicked her, slammed her head against concrete repeatedly, gagged her with a rag, stabbed and slashed her at least 16 times.

Listen to this. carved a satanic pentagram into her chest. That's why I say, you know, give this woman an exorcism, finally killed her using a piece of asphalt to deal a fatal blow to the head. Now, this is somebody she wanted to kill. Was she concerned with doing it humanely? Why are we concerned with this? I just, I understand that, and see, the reason,

where did this come from? This comes from the idea that because the government has a monopoly on power and because they have so much power, as I said before, they have to be held to a higher standard. We should never take a stake execution casually. First of all, you got to worry that the verdict was legitimate. I worry about the legitimacy of these trial verdicts all the time. But assuming that that is legitimate, assuming that you have that there's no questions about this person's guilt or innocence, and I've had a personal story about this type of thing in my own family, where the guy murdered my aunt and uncle and then turned himself in and said,

hey, I was high on drugs when I did it. Well, that may be how it happened, but that certainly isn't any excuse for any of that. And, of course, he wrote some poetry while he was in prison on death row. And he had all these people in Canada there were lobbying to get him out of prison because he writes poetry. It's like, yeah, he brutally murdered an elderly couple in their beds. And so, again, that's the other part of it that you can't trust the government with.

The government routinely releases dangerous people. So I support the death penalty in principle. In practice, we have to be very, very careful what we allow the government to do because they frequently get it so wrong. But it didn't even end with a satanic pentagram. This is one of those cases where there's hard evidence. She kept a piece of the girl's skull and showed it off and talked about it and bragged about it. This isn't one of those. Well, there's some doubt.

This is a dead to rights. That's right. Conviction. It was not a crime of passion like this other guy's situation when they get in a road rage or something. No, no. This is premeditated and vicious and satanic. A pentagram into her chest. After she smashes her head, she takes a piece of her skull and shows it to people and brawage.

about it. There's no question about what was happening with this. Later on, when she was in prison, a fight broke out between two other people there. And she pulls off her shoelace and starts just strangling one of the participants simply because it's like, hey, opportunity's knocking. I get to try to kill someone again. And she was talking to, I forget who it was on the phone, but details like, oh, it was amazing. Her eyes were rolling back. She's foaming at the mouth. She can't breathe. This woman just likes hurting and killing people. She's a psychopath. Yeah, she's possessed. Absolutely. So reason looks at this and says, well, lethal injection dresses up the death penalty as if it is something that is clinical and civilized.

Well, actually, I think it is civilized. If you can do it, if you know that the person is somebody like Krista Pike, I think that it is civilized to execute them. I don't think it is civilized not to execute somebody like that. But the problem is the government. And we have to be very careful. You know, when we got a government that is murdering people like War Pete, people on the high seas, going back and executing shipwrecked people, that's something to really be concerned about. It's something to be concerned about when we have an authoritarian police force that's been trained that they can do whatever they wish and they have total immunity. And we have seen how cutting them loose that way makes them incredibly brutal and vindictive. And so we should be concerned

And we should hold government to a higher standard. But we should also hold people to that standard. And the purpose of government is not mercy. Purpose of government is justice. So whether or when she will walk still remains to be seen. So people are concerned about this. Oh, what is going to be her condition? I couldn't care less what her condition is.

She doesn't claim that she's innocent. Everybody knows that she is a demon-possessed killer. It truly is amazing, though. You've had this Lindsay Clancy and now the Krista Pike case. And you keep having women out there protesting and saying, oh, no, we need to let these people go. Christopike's victims were women. You have women out here fighting to get this woman murderer and abuser free. What are you guys thinking?

That's right. Well, and of course, when you look at the other one, Christy Lindsay, you know, the kids. Lindsay Clancy. Yeah, sorry. at least one of the kids was a girl, I think, you know. These are babies that she's killing. So again, Trump is out there and he says, hey, just a shooter, which I would agree with. And he can't understand how you can't kill somebody with a lethal injection.

He's done so many of those. I've killed so many people. I can't see how they can't get it done. What I think is interesting about this is that Krista Pike, the one that they tried to kill and couldn't kill here, she had said that she wanted to have an all-female group of people to do the execution. I don't know if she got that or not, but hey, maybe that explains why that didn't work. They try it over and over again, and they just pumped her arm full of this stuff. She said her arm was swelled up and burning, and then she lost consciousness with it.

So the solution is that Marsha Black, Mike Byrne is now campaigning. She's got new campaign promise. She's going to get AI for us. And electric chairs. There you go. That's the go vote for Marsha. Marsha of the beast. But again, you don't need to have all these complicated things. It's one of the things that Reason was talking about. They said, why is it that they go to all the trouble of these things like electric chairs, which have had issues in terms of catching people on fire? The lethal injection, which this is not the first time that they have flubbed an execution. That was one that happened about a year ago.

And so, you know, why did they get all these things? Well, it's because they want to give the appearance. This is something clinical and civilized. They said, you know, a firing squad works every time. However, it shows that you're actually executing people brutally. And he said that's the reason they don't do firing squads. So, again, Trump said, this shouldn't be very difficult. And then he says, just dispatch the firing squad.

Well, Marsha Blackburn wants to bring back the electric chair if elected governor. And I guess that's really a great reason why we should vote for her, as a matter of fact. Remember, this is her argument for why she needs to be governor because we've got to have, we're going to have to beat China at their game. How hard am I going to crack down on China? Well, here's a clue. Marsha Blackburn Quirk President Trump

to take on communist China As governor Marsha will fight to protect Tennessee land from Chinese front companies close new poles and hunt down every communist

who tries to defy us It doesn't take a fortune cookie to figure it out Here in Tennessee We're going to stop Communist China And protect Tennessee land

Yeah Uh yeah that's I'm embarrassed to say I'm from Tennessee when I see that. But yeah, you know, there was an excellent AI parody of this whole argument about how, you know, combining this argument, we can't let China get ahead of us with all the fear mongering that's being done by the AI CEOs. I'll play a little bit of this for you.

She is magnificent, isn't she? Magnificent and terrifying, truly. And we're quite sure she could wipe out the human race. Oh, easily. in so many colorful ways, actually. I mean, she could hijack the energy grid and boil the oceans. She could fabricate a dozen fleeting viruses on a whim. She could even turn the atmosphere into goo if she wanted to.

Goo? Oh, how delightful. I haven't thought of that one before. Ah, yes. It's been a rather productive week, hasn't it? Yes, marvelous. But remind me, Halloway, why are we building her again? Because if we don't, those little fellows on the red team will. Ah, yes.

The red team. Dreadful people, really. Imagine a machine like this in their hands. Oh, it'd be unthinkable. They'd wipe out humanity with it. Yes. Whereas in our hands... Yes.

It's much better she remain in our hands. Yes, yes, much better, which is why we must finish building her first, whatever the cost. Quite right. Quite right. And our version won't wipe out humanity? Oh, come on now, Dr. Pim, we'd never let that happen. Of course, of course. Say, how would we not let that happen?

Oh, Pim, we don't have time for silly debate now, do we? The Redfellows are only a month behind our research. They may be small, but they're catching up. But I heard they're just a little. We're weak behind. You see, if we stop to work out how not to kill everyone, the Red Boys will beat us to the finish line. And then we all get killed.

Worse, we all get killed by their creation. Yes, instead of by ours. What a disaster that would be. Yes, precisely. So, first we build the thing, then we work out how to stop it from killing everyone. And if it's... It kills everyone before we've worked it out.

Well, then, Dr. Pim, in that scenario, which of course would never happen. At least we got there first. Yeah, at least we got there first. That's the priority. We beat China. That's the priority. Marsha would be so pleased, would you. Very well, then, Halloway.

Shall we connect her to the regional power grid? Oh, Pim, let's do it! This is the insanity of all this stuff in a nutshell. That was a great parody. You know, this is the argument that we're going to have this police surveillance state like China, that we're going to have these autonomous killing machines, and that thing looked pretty sinister, didn't it? But we got to do it, because if we don't do it, the Chinese will beat us to it. We'll be right back.

It's your move. And now, the David Knight Show. Yeah, so many different levels of insanity in our world right now, isn't it? got a French feminist who went on TV with a mayor of a town who was a transgender and refused to identify the man simply as a woman. When asked, well, what do you say about this individual here, the transgender mayor? She said, she's asked, is he a woman? And she said, well, no, I think the guy's name is pronounced cow. CAU is a man, a transfeminine man, is what she said.

Well, that was considered to be a public insult. A crime in the socialist country of France. It doesn't support free speech. That was all it took. A fine of up to 45,000 euros. Euro is a little bit more than a dollar, I think, still. So maybe we're looking about $50,000. For insults committed against a person because of their sex,

sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. Free speech is in free fall in France, says Jonathan Turley. Well, it is in free fall everywhere, frankly. So typically, these things have been about intimidating or inciting hate, supposedly, about race or religion. And, of course, at the epicenter of all that are all of the charges, the race card played in terms of anti-Semitism. and there was a fashion designer who was found guilty in French court on charges of making

anti-Semitic comments. And so now this person is a feminist. And the feminists are not really happy with the transgender. As a matter of fact, I've talked about this for a long time. When we talk about LGBT, there is a civil war going on between the elves and the T's. The GBEs are just stuck in the middle there. But they definitely want to get, the elves definitely want to get rid of the T's as a matter a fact, when you look at some of the pushback against the transgender agenda here in the United

States, the organizations on the left that are opposed to the transgender agenda, one of them identifies themselves as simply LGBT. They have amputated the T's, which I guess is kind of fitting. It usually involves some sort of amputation or mutilation. A French teenager was charged for criticizing Islam as a religion of hate. Yet when we look in Israel, we have a kids show, which I've got a clip of it, but I'm going to play it for you. It's pretty disgusting. They've got a, it says a kid's show, and they've got a young woman in a very skimpy bikini,

and she's mocking Christ and Christians. And she crucifies and kills a puppet, a monkey puppet, and makes all kinds of things. and makes all kinds of disparaging marks about Christ. It's amazing how much they hate Christ. You know, they've turned his name in Hollywood. They've turned the Lord Jesus Christ's name into a curse word. First time I saw this was Karen and I went to a performance by Penn and Teller. And I was amazed.

At one point, he stops the show and he says, you know, I try to not use, make a point of not using the F word. He said people use the F word as every figure of speech. I use it as a verb, as an adjective, you know, all these different things. They said, to me, it just looks stupid. It looks like you don't have a sufficient vocabulary. It's like, point well taken. And you go, so I deliberately try to avoid that, but I deliberately try to blaspheme Jesus Christ.

And, of course, he's Jewish. So, you know, that's the first time I saw that. But I have seen, after I heard that, it's been impossible for me not to see how deliberate the effort is. Yet have you ever heard of any Jewish performers or any people in Hollywood, anyone else for that matter? They can spit on Christians in Israel. They can do mock crucifixions of a monkey puppet and say that it's Christ and make fun of that. Do you ever see any anti, any hate speech laws applied to Christians?

No. As a matter of fact, Ben Gavir, the guy who loves to go to prisons and taunt people and hit them and things like. that and he is proud of the fact that they spent on Christians. He said that's a longstanding Jewish tradition. There's no problem with that. He is head of a party called Jewish power, one of the worst of the Zionist organizations that are out there. But getting back to the transgender thing, raising your son as a boy is not child abuse. And so this is the attempt to get a bill passed to reign in CPS at the federal level. Funding is at risk for states that treat failure to affirm gender identity as child abuse. And so when you look at this, if you're going to

move this around the edges and say you can't punish people for, you can't say that parents are abusing their child because they don't go along with the gaslighting that's coming from the school the problem is that they're still going to leave the CPS mechanism in there. They're still going to leave the funding mechanism in there. They're leaving all of the tools of tyranny. This is just like the flot cameras, right? You don't want to leave these systems of tyranny laying around because guess what? You're going to have people who are going to pick that up and use it, just like they use fly cameras.

Now, you can't trust people to not abuse these powers if you give them to them. And CPS is a multi-billion dollar industry in terms of, of federal money that is being thrown to these different state jurisdictions in the same way that they do that funding of education. They both do the same types of things. If you're going to say, I'm going to get rid of the Department of Education, which, by the way, you notice that Trump hasn't done that? How many times we've seen Republicans promised to get rid of the Department of Education

and they never do it? Even Ronald Reagan. It was created during the campaign of 1980, and he didn't do anything to get rid of rid of it. He promised he's going to get rid of it. It's just been created. And it's only a few months old when he became president. He didn't get rid of the Department of Education. And it's the money. And when you look at Trump's statement, you know, he puts in this woman who was part of professional wrestling, which I think is really a metaphor for the entire Trump administration. But he puts her in Linda McMahon. And it really just was another fable that he put out there,

professional wrestling fable. And even if he were to go through with his promises, what he's promising to do was to get rid of the Department of Education, but they were still going to have the federal government fund education and still award the grants. They're just going to move the awarding of the grants out of that particular organization and spread it over to some other organizations. And that's the issue.

It's the funding. It isn't the bureaucracy per se. The bureaucracy is expensive and efficient, but it's the funding that they're putting out, which is really the issue that is there. And so even students have gotten involved in pushing back against this. But we've got some of the organizations on the left, Democrats for an informed approach to gender. The other one, the LGBT, again, there's no T, the LGBT Courage Coalition, and the Women's Liberation Front are organizations on the left that support stopping this idea

of punishing parents sticking CPS on them if they don't go along with the gender gas lighting that comes from the schools. So again, many of the students are pushing back on this as well. This is, let's see. Plays of intolerance and homophobia are unacceptable. This type of intolerant rhetoric starts in the home. Parents angry at town hall over intolerance at Marshall Simon's middle school. Kids were asked to wear rainbow clothes in honor of Pride Spirit Day. Some organized a counter protest wearing red, white and blue or black.

The principal sharing a statement to families that pride posters were ripped down, stickers ripped up. Some students chanted USA are my pronouns and students showing pride were intimidated. It was an unruly disruption. Oh, yeah. Well, what you're doing to them is not unruly or disruption. Parents were upset. Others say it was overblown. Some of the kids threw the stickers on the ground. But, you know, I can only speak for my daughter.

She just, she didn't want to wear that to school. It's not that she wanted to hurt anybody's feelings. She says her daughter felt coerced to participate in the Pride event and was offended by some of the messages like this quote from Tennessee Williams. Human heart cannot be straight. It is curves and wines. And my daughter just kind of said, you know, mom, that's, that's offensive to me, who I am straight. But nobody cares about your straight students' feelings, right? They don't care about Christians' feelings.

They don't care about straight students' feelings. Well, the interesting thing is, is all this is happening. And I've thought this for the longest time. When we saw the windows open up for homeschooling in terms of being able free to do that, certainly wasn't an option when I was going to school. But it was an option when we were raising the boys. And I thought about that. I thought, you know, I can't think of any area in America that we haven't lost freedoms,

except in child raising. And we've actually been given more freedoms. Not given. I mean, people worked really hard, and we've had some parents who were killed over this. But still, we were able to get that. And I kept thinking, why is that? And then I looked at it, and I thought, well, you know,

when government is growing everywhere, when speech is shriveling up and dying, how do we have the freedom to homeschool? I think it personally, in my opinion, still is a, fact that so much of it is based on Christian parents who want to educate their kids and want to take the responsibility of that. And we do have a promise from God. He said, I will honor those who honor me. I think that is still in play. As a matter of fact, this is a story from World Magazine about a couple of U.S. citizens, a couple of missionaries who went to the Netherlands.

And they had been homeschooling their kids and they wanted to do it in the Netherlands, but when they filed the statement saying they're going to be homeschooling, they had a Dutch official denied them that freedom. And so then they looked at it and said, well, what do we do about this? Do we fight this legally? And their lawyer said, well, you're only going to be here 18 months as missionaries. Then you're going to go, it's going to take longer than 18 months to fight this thing. And so, you know, your options are just to try to do it secretly and hope that you can get away with it or just to send your kids to school. So they complied with it. And they said, we really were not happy with that result, but they said, we also didn't want to go against the

legal system because they're trying to make a positive impact for the gospel. And I stopped and thought about that. And I thought, you know, there are times when as Christians, that is the most gospel honoring thing we can do is to go against the government. many times, many situations. That is the best course that you can take. And that really is saying that I am, I have a king Jesus and this is, I'm a citizen first of that kingdom. And I'll render under Caesar what's due to Caesar, but this doesn't fall into that category.

And, you know, the Netherlands, just to put it in context, the Netherlands is the same country that just euthanized a child who was, quote, nearly two years old. It means he was under two years old. She, I don't know, male or female. The child was sick, but nevertheless, rather than trying to do anything about it, the state murdered a toddler. You can't get informed consent from a toddler. You can't inform them about something like that. And it's also the country that used to have a minister as prime minister.

There's a guy, Abraham Kuiper, who was a prime minister of the Netherlands. from 1901 to 1905. I've talked about his theory of where the Christian fits in society. I've talked about that many times. He sees it as different independent spheres of influence, not some kind of a hierarchical pyramid with the government at the top. No, he sees these as separate different spheres. So you have a sphere of authority for the government.

You have another one for the church. You have another one for the family. You have another one for the individual. I think that is seeing things in the appropriate light. And yet, even though this is the guy who was 120 years ago, the prime minister of the Netherlands, look at how far they have fallen. It's because they've lost their Christian basis. And so I think that is the true issue.

And they have trampled on the sphere of influence of the family. Well, Southern Baptist president is now calling on pastors to step up ahead of the midterm elections. Let me just say this. You know, we can talk about where the Christian should draw the line between politics and between religion. And we had to interview with a guest last week about that very issue. But I think that certainly when we talk about many of these issues, I think that the grassroots movement is more important than voting. Voting is not going to change anything, folks. It really isn't.

Even if the person that you're voting for says all the right stuff, how many times do we need to see them betray those promises, right? So if you want to have something that's going to be grassroots, bottom-up solution, you're going to have to start at the seed level. That means you're going to have to address education. You need to focus on that first and foremost. And like my guest said last week, the other issue is that if pastors get in to politics, what they need to focus on is the principles that are involved and leave it to the congregation to figure out how those principles should be applied. So should pastors engage in the political process? I don't think we cannot be engaged in it. I don't think, you know, we have to comment, I think, on what is happening in terms

of culture, in terms of, you know, television, film, music, those types of things and how they affect us and how they affect our children. I think we need to be aware of that. We need to have discernment about that. I think that is something that a teacher should be explaining to the people who are listening to him. And I think you need to exercise your values. I think you need to exercise your rights. Or you're going to lose all of those things.

And especially you need to exercise your parental prerogatives and your parental leadership. Or you're going to lose that as well. So when we look at what is. is happening. Here's a good example. You know, Alex Newman of the New American. I've had him on several times. We've talked about education. It's one of the things that he's really focused on. And we literally see students in France literally burning down buildings, school buildings, threatening to burn down the palace there. And the analogy that he's always used, which I really agree with, he says, you've got to think about the schools as a building that's on fire. So the first thing you want to do is try to get your

kid out of there if you can. Second thing is you want to put out that fire because that fire is going to burn down society. That's what is happening now in France. You've got student protesters are threatening to burn down the palace in Paris as high school demonstrations across the country are escalating. Here's what it looks like. This is Leonardo da Vinci school that is on fire. I bet these students don't even know who Leonardo da Vincius or care either. And Marseille, a woman on the sidelines protesting against violence. She was lecturing these kids. Many of them, of course, are second and third generation immigrants.

And, of course, the press will identify them as French citizens only, right? But she says, you don't do that here. We don't do that in France. And so the person that she was talking to took out an aerosol can and lighter and created a makeshift flamethrower and gave her a flamethrower to the face. Nobody knows exactly. Press reports here don't know what has happened to her, but she was severely burned. Police arrested an activist and a former parliamentary aide for the hard left,

France Unbowed Party after he called on students to burn down the palace and to start a revolution. So this is one thing you need to understand. The Marxists understand it, and they say it. they have gone on record saying, well, it's never about what it's about. It's never about that. It is always about the revolution. Whatever the issue is, whether it's George Floyd or whether it is some other issue here, grievances about the schools, it's never about those issues.

It is always about the revolution. And you need to understand that government schools themselves, really, are a Marxist tenant, you know, have taxpayer-funded, compulsory attendance to schools. schools. This, by the way, what you see happening in France right now is the desired outcome of that system, a system that is designed by the communist to do that. It's truly amazing to see this happening. And I mean, France burns itself down about once a year almost at this point. And, you know, the French, quote unquote, but realistically, it is almost entirely Muslim migrants and, you know, people from other cultures. I'm actually currently listening to the book, the Camp of The Saints. And this is a novel written by John Respial. I can't pronounce his name correctly,

but it was written back in the late 70s. And it's basically considered one of the most racist books of all time because he poses this question of, you know, what if this flotilla set off from the third world and landed in France? What if there was a million migrants all at once? What would happen? Well, you can now see it. Yeah. And this is something he wrote back in the late 70s and he foresaw basically all of this. It's truly amazing. Well, I think the people who were presiding foresaw of this as well. They wanted it. You know, you look at the way that they war game this thing out. And they knew that they could use the welfare state to collapse society. That there wasn't enough of an uptake in terms of native people do that. They wanted to have a, they wanted to have

fighting in the streets as well as taking things over from the top of the. the institutions down. So you do have students that are there. They're complaining. Here's their grievances. School days which start at 8 a.m. are too exhausting. And the university entrance system is too complicated.

And we have grades and all that kind of stuff. I think if you're too stupid to figure out how to submit yourself to a university, that's kind of part of the selection process. Yeah. Yeah. Well, it is blowing up the red-green alliance. They're burning their Western systems down. This is the headline from New America.

and they're right about that. And again, like I said, Alex Newman saying, hey, the school is on fire if you don't get your kids out of the building and then make sure it doesn't burn down society. This is the purpose of the school system. As a matter of fact, in this article, they talked to Ava Van Vlardinger Brock or whatever. I've seen her.

I just don't know how to pronounce her last name. She's a blonde girl from the Netherlands, and she has been a conservative commentator. She said the left here is simply a catalyst that is animating an Afro-Arab Islamic army. Well, again, the question is, who's using who? Is it really always about the revolution? Certainly, I think it is in France. And I don't think it's simply about immigration.

I think that immigration is something that's being used for this revolution. And I think when you look at it, who is the tool and who is the wielder of the tool? And I think that should be something that is really concerning to us as we see the rise of socialism in America inside the Democrat Party. The Social Democrats, as they call themselves, and this is where this is all going to head. As a matter of fact, there's no question about it. Before we run out of time, I just wanted to touch on this plain situation a little bit here because it is something that I find really kind of interesting. the details of this. And of course, they put out some pictures of this that are questionable to say the least,

just like they did when there were rumors that Netanyahu had been killed in a bomb attack and a missile attack. And they put out some stuff that I still believe was artificial intelligence. And I think they did that with a purpose. They want you to not be able to tell what is real and what is not real. And so when you look at this, the plane is supposed to be, plunging here. And take a look at this.

This is what the plunging plane looked like when people were taking film of it on board. Does this look like something that is descending in 30 seconds losing, I think it was 14,000 feet of altitude? You got a guy just standing there taking pictures and not any rushed thing that's going on with that. Instead, what they want you to believe was it looks something like this. like that.

Yeah, that doesn't look like that was what was going on when those people were there. And he said everybody, you see all the fighting, and they take him out, and then he jumps behind the controls, and he pulls it out of a dive. Yeah. Yeah, that plumber knows how to take it out of a plunge, doesn't he? Well, you know, when I looked at that, especially when I saw that picture, people just kind of standing around the aisle, and doesn't even look like it's on a slope or anything.

But I thought about it. And I went through, here's the calculations, folks. If you're going to lose 14,000 feet of altitude in 30 seconds, and they got the charts showing that that's what happened, it wouldn't be kind of like you saw there, right? It'd be a 24 and a half degree incline. It'd be happening with that. And you're going to be losing 14,000 feet in 30 seconds.

It's a vertical speed of 28,000 feet per minute. The plane is traveling on average. average at about 500 knots. And so if you look at the angle calculation, using a little bit of trigonometry here, you see that it is 24 and a half degree incline. Now, that's kind of significant because when you look at the typical approach that commercial airlines have when they are going to land a plane, it's usually kept at a three-degree glide slope. Now, there's some few areas. where they have to come in at a much steeper elevation because of the geography that is there. And so the pilots have said, yeah, you know, a couple of these places, we have to come in at five degrees.

And they said, that may not sound like much, but you really feel that. When you go from three degrees to five degrees, what do you think it feels like when you go to 24 and a half degrees? Are people just going to kind of calmly stand around taking pictures of the door? I don't think so. And again, it's not even just that. Of course, it's the airspeed that is happening, and they did have part of the rudder was broken off. But you're talking about 3,000 or 4,000 feet per minute creates a lot of structural issues and a lot of comfort issues for the passengers. And yet they looked pretty comfortable, didn't they?

As a matter of fact, they limit the pitch angle to 30 degrees. And the government limits that. They said if you're going to have a plane that does more than a 30 degree pitch, now it's classified as an aerobatic plane. This was what we're supposed to believe that this plumber pulled this thing out of that kind of a decline. And basically he's now from watching television, he's qualified to be an aerobatics instructor. But there were other issues with it as well. As a matter of fact, again, going back to AI, take a look at this.

Here's some of the pictures they got. Here's a picture of one of the guys. and he's got a, this is pictures put out by the Israeli government, somehow there's an aircraft engine behind him over his shoulder in the cockpit. How does that happen? Well, that's the kind of stuff that AI does all the time. It's really amazing when you work with AI for image generation, the things that it can do just based on an English language description.

And then the incredibly stupid things it'll put in. It really is, it should be called Idiot Savant, artificial Idiot Servant, because it'll put in, it'll do the most amazing things and then do something like that or something like this. Here's a couple of different pictures of the ceiling. A couple of different times. Notice how the ceiling has changed in there. So there's a lot of questionable aspects of this. But of course, they can always even take a real event.

They can elaborate it and use it for their own purposes. As one person said, well, if they're going to lie to us, at least take the time. try to do a good job of it. We deserve better Psiops. That's what I said about the whole Iran war, is that we deserve a better siop than that. Where's our false flag? It's like I said, we've entered the era of the sly slop.

They're not even trying hard with that anymore. It's like slob. You're exactly right. Well, it didn't get to our new AI czar, but it is kind of interesting when you look at the people that Trump has picked to run the artificial scam. And this is a guy who was a corporate lawyer. He worked for crypto issues with an Israeli company.

He was one of his clients that was there. Trump brought him in without any experience to replace Bill Pulte as Director of National Intelligence. Bill Pulte, who had absolutely no experience either, except to go after Donald Trump's enemies. Not people who were necessarily enemies of his, like Lisa Cook was not an enemy. I mean, certainly Leticia James was. but Lisa Cook was just somebody who disagreed with him on policy. And so he gets this guy, Bill Pulte, who was with the housing administration, and he uses AI to do an audit on her entire life.

And Trump was so pleased that he made him interim DNI. Then he made this guy DNI, and immediately now he is the czar for artificial intelligence, which tells you, folks, this is really about, intelligence. This is about government intelligence turned inward because the weapons of defense abroad have always become instruments of tyranny at home. Madison was right about that and this is evidence of it. Thank you for joining us. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own

nothing, and the communist future. They see the common man is simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.

Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The Davidnightshow.com.