The David Knight Show - Thr 24Oct24 David Knight UNABRIDGED - The 30 Year War, "Thousand Times More Intense", Has Already Begun

Episode Date: October 24, 2024

(2:00) Is the establishment leaning toward SELECTING Trump over Lala?James Carville, the political equivalent of contra-indicator Jim Cramer, gives his 3 reasons why Lala will winLala's campaign is a drunken version of Seinfeld — a campaign about nothingTulsi Gabbard switches to Trump — making it ALL DEMOCRAT nowLA Times owner, a definite insider, blocks endorsement of Harris.  What does he know?The UK disinformation group makes it their top priority — IN WRITING — to kill TwitterTrump talks about reparations fund for victims of crimes committed by illegals — can we get some reparations for people injured by his vaccine?(38:43) Atmos-FEAR — the latest from Sci-Fi climate griftersComputer "model" says best solution is to put ground up DIAMONDS into the stratosphere at a stratospheric cost — $200 TRILLIONGeoengineering madness - small amount of THIS powder removes more CO2 than a tree — but doesn't give off oxygenPentagon proceeds with plans to create a virtual army of surveillance bots and liars across social media Was it John Connor? Someone sabotaged AI "training" (training to lie to us).Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen says the AI war on information will be a "thousand times more intense" than our current fight against censorship(1:09:17) NewsGrizzly killed in car accident, a grizzly death on a Taylor Swift cruise, and a drunk driver and the Lala motorcade (the drunk driver wasn't Lala)IRS adjusts brackets for inflation and the MOTHER OF ALL INFLATION, Janet Yellen, says they will close the deficit gap by using AI and an army of IRS agents to SQUEEZE the public more — TRILLIONS moreTrump lockdown hangover still destroying restaurants — the highest number of failures since he started the retail lockdown apocalypse in 2020(1:34:56) A 50-fold increase in heart disease says Japanese study, but mainstream US media tries to sell the lie that heart disease DECREASED after jab.  If you're gonna lie, lie big. (1:47:25) INTERVIEW Tony Arterburn, Another BRICS in the Wall Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight.goldAs BRICS meet, what is the goal of their cross borders payments?What is the effect of BRICS on gold?Geopolitical earthquake in Saudi Arabia and Iran rapprochement(2:25:40) LIVE listener comments (2:28:58) Fear NOTNon-Christians see Christians as fearful - "phobic".  While those psychological labels are simply a smear, are Christians being given a spirit of fear by leaders who push them into the political paradigm of fear about presidential politics that both left and right are enslaved to?Do parents fully realize the evil that Disney has become?WATCH Shirley Temple talk about the MGM pedophiles and lecherous people in Hollywood even when she was a child"Average Joe" — new film tells the journey of Joe Kennedy from atheist to a man of conviction who fought religious intolerance and oppression by government all the way to the Supreme Court  — to victory!If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

La probabilité d'être frappé par la foudre est inférieure à 1 sur 1 million. Mais quand vous entendez ce bruit, vous pourrez probablement vous mettre à l'abri. Saviez-vous que la probabilité de contracter le zona est de 1 sur 3 si vous avez déjà été atteint de varicelle? Pourquoi courir le risque? Consultez votre médecin pour savoir comment Shingrix peut aider à prévenir le zona. Le vaccin Shingrix aide à protéger les adultes contre le zona.

Une protection totale n'est pas garantie. Des effets indésirables peuvent survenir. Vis vaccin Shingrix aide à protéger les adultes contre le zona. Une protection totale n'est pas garantie. Des effets indésirables peuvent survenir. Visitez Shingrix.ca Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 24th of October. Year of our Lord, 2024. Well, today we're going to begin by taking a quick look at politics as the predictions of james carville come into view along with other people i'll tell you what i think is how this is breaking and of course we look at james carville he's kind of the equivalent

of uh jim cramer when it comes to politics uh you can use them as a contraindicator uh but we're gonna take a look at that we're also gonna take a look at uh technology you know they're now money is no object when it comes to uh climate fear right because we call atmosphere uh they're now talking about grinding up diamonds and putting them into the atmosphere. I mean, you know, spare no cost. Who cares if it costs trillions of dollars? We're all going to die if we don't do it. We'll be right back. Stay with us. James Carville, three reasons I'm certain Lala Harris will win. Well, that means that you can bet that Trump is going to win. This guy, like I said, is the Jim Cramer of politics.

Forget all of these op-ed pieces that you see places, all of these polls and everything. I think the real harbinger is to watch where the people who are connected, the people who know how they're moving around. And with the exception of Bill Gates, who is a dyed-in-the-wool depopulationist, pretty much everybody is switching towards Trump. So I think the rats are jumping on board the ship as you start to look at this stuff. So he says, can Kamala Harris win this thing? He says, all these people are asking me, can she win it? Are we going to be okay? And of course, they do have reason to be concerned.

Here's one example of it. A presidential song for anyone. One Nation Under a Groove by Funkadelic. One nation under a groove. Getting down just for the funk of it can i get it on the yeah why'd she have this vibe she always seems to be drunk you know the only time i ever saw saw women like that was when i was in a band you know i didn't hang around typically places where people were drinking she got that drunk vibe about her i can't sing either she comes across as like a six-year-old not 60s so why would they be concerned you know nothing to be concerned about

uh here's another example here of Lala. the lid off and having my cup out so that I don't have that big lipstick mark on the lid. So I said, can we do something about the color of the lid? So that was that conversation. Yeah, I guess we could say, kind of like Seinfeld, this is a campaign about nothing. It's just about nothing. Or of course, you know, the real problem with those lids, they're white. If they weren't white, we didn't have this problem. We need some lids of color.

Well, uh, he gives us three reasons Carville does as to why he thinks that, um, this is going to go their way. He says, Mr. Trump is a repeat electoral loser. This time he'll be no different. And he points out that in 2018, it goes usually in the midterms, it always goes to the other, they have a shift to the party that is,

when you've got a newly elected president, it shifts to the opposite party. But that shift in 2018 was, he said, a landslide for Democrats in a midterm election, the biggest one since Watergate. And then when you look at 2020, he lost that. Yeah, I think he did. I know a lot of people don't believe it. The same people that are urging you to go of people don't believe the same people that are urging you

to go vote again don't believe the outcome uh whatever uh and then in 2022 another one right and you look at the people that he picked and things like that of course he likes to say well yeah he signed on all these people that were sure uh for our winners. And as if he had anything to do with that. No, the people that he picked, people like Blake Masters and people like Dr. Oz, handed the Democrats the Senate. But so it makes the case that Trump is a repeat electoral loser. Well, what about Lala? She didn't even stand for election, right? I mean, this is somebody who, when she ran for president in 2020, she was consistently polling way less than 1%.

She went to the debates and she couldn't handle the debates. She dropped out before the first caucus in Iowa. And so she didn't get any votes at all when she ran for president in 2020 and she didn't get any votes this time either she was selected and put in place then he goes on to say money matters and mrs harris has it in droves well she does have more billionaires funding her than even trump does and we should all be concerned about the fact that elections always are and always have been an advanced auction of stolen goods as uh was said a century ago uh but But nothing changes with that. And of course, when Trump won in 2016,

he spent less money than Hillary Clinton did. As I pointed out the other day, she wound up raising something like 600 and something million, and she spent about 400 and something million. So I don't know where that other 200 million went. What do you think? Anyway, and then his third big reason is it's just a feeling. This is why I say he's the Jim Cramer of politics.

My final reason is 100% emotional. They are constantly told that America is too divided, too hopelessly stricken by tribalism. See, that's why I think Trump will be selected. I think they want that division. I think they want that tribalism. And nobody feeds it. I mean, that's his intuition right there.

To me, that is the number one reason why I think that they will pick Trump. For the tribalism, for the division, and because he will reassure the people who would normally have the safeties off of their weapons that everything's going to be just fine. He's in charge there. He's 40 chest. And no matter how bad it looks, you'll have the MAGA media telling everybody,

it's 40 chest, don't worry. You can take the shot. It's just sugar water, right? So one of the people who was instrumental in taking out uh lala probably the most instrumental person was tulsi gabbard and she's just announced her switch to the gop as i've said many times the gop has become the democrat party of my youth uh these people think about this we got we're the big heavy hitters in the Republican party on the presidential side.

Well, we got Trump, Democrat, ran as a Democrat. First time he ran. Always was a New York Democrat, friend of the Clintons, friend of Epstein. Anyway, we got Trump. We got RFK Jr. We got Musk. It was always a Democrat. We got Gabbard, a Democrat, World Economic Forum young leader.

I tell you, it's a good thing that our hope does not depend on the presidency, isn't it? Because there isn't anything to hope for there. It's a pretty hopeless situation there. So, you know, when we go back and look at Tulsi Gabbard, she was a pro-life democrat when she first started run she realized that wasn't going to get her anywhere so she became pro-infanticide and she was rewarded uh for that deal with the devil uh to become a congresswoman from a heavily democrat oi? So, so much for her principles.

Meanwhile, this is another indication that I think, uh, things are people behind the scenes or, uh, understand the selection is in for Trump. The LA times owner has blocked endorsement of Harris. Ooh.

So most of the people there in the la times are democrats and they really want to endorse her but the owner the owner says no you think this guy's connected uh he is one of the most significant insiders and he's going to have intel as to who the selection is you know why would he block this why would he go against all of his staff? For two decades, they've done Democrat endorsements in that heavily Democrat state, heavily Democrat city of L.A. His executive editor is Terry Tang. His name, the owner, and I had not noticed this before, so I looked to see who is this guy? The owner of the L.A. Times is a guy named Patrick Soon-Shiong. who is this guy uh the owner of the la times is a guy named patrick soon shiong where's this guy coming from well it turns out that he is asian um his parents are

chinese they immigrated to south africa um as china as way back when China was invaded by Japan. They left the country and they went to South Africa. His background, how he became so rich, is he's a biotech big pharma bro. Yeah. And he's also become a venture capitalist for artificial intelligence. And he is the owner of the la times

now terry tang is his executive editor she is also chinese taiwanese specifically but both of them are chinese his decision to block the endorsement of harris will be seen as a major blow to the vice president as the la times is the most prominent newspaper in her home state of california now it may be that he is doing this another uh possibility is not that he's got the inside scoop that fixes on for trump but i think that there is a newton ingrich just talked about this he said he thinks that there's a real uh push to try to undermine her um you know biden doesn't like her the obamas i think see her as somebody they'd like to get out of the way to clear the path for michelle obama to run the next time because that'll be an open uh presidency right and so you know both the Republicans, she's not going to be whoever runs in four years from now, assuming we have a country.

If the globalists aren't able to pull off their 2030 agenda, we'd still have a country. And if that's the case, they want to have Michelle Obama running again. And I think that's the case with a lot of them. So that may be what is behind this. Then we also had the book drop from John Kelly, who says that Trump is a fascist and believes that fascism would work better than the American democracy. Well, it's no question that John Kelly despises Trump. And part of this is when you look at it what does it tell you

about trump the man that everybody who worked for him despises him all these people that he put in his cabinet i mean they have come out hardcore pushed him to the other side uh pushed matt drudge to the other side all the rest is i mean it's the people who know him really don't like him and so this is not in defense of trump uh because i do think that he is authoritarian uh but if you look at his definition of fascism i think it's interesting uh in an interview with anderson cooper john kelly said well looking at the definition of fashion he says why do you call him a fascist he said well well, looking at the definition of fascism, he says, why do you call him a fascist? He said, well, if you look at the definition of fascism, it is a far-right, authoritarian,

ultra-nationalist political ideology and a movement that's characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, and belief in a natural social hierarchy. Okay, so nothing in there about the economic side of fascism. And of course, we know the economic side of fascism was retaining private control until the very end, as Adolf Hitler said. He said, Stalin's got it wrong. You know, the communists want to come in and take ownership of everything he said they don't know how to run anything so he said i'll let the people who know how to run it run it they'll run it for my purposes and then i'll take

it over at the end when i get everything that i want uh and it was far right and it was nationalists and on communist side they pushed the idea of internationalism. And so those two things are a little bit different, okay, between them. It's a distinction. But when you talk about right or left, when you talk about ultra-nationalist or ultra-internationalist, because remember their anthem was the Internationale, right? When you talk about that that that's just the way they sell it both of them govern exactly the same they are both authoritarian both totalitarian

whether you're talking about communism or fascism and to stress that i would just say the movement is characterized by now think about this does this apply to the communists as well as to the fascists does it apply to lala and biden dictatorial leadership yeah look at the executive orders every one of these presidents every time is doing more and more executive orders and of course he kept all these horrific executive orders from trump who was very authoritarian with his executive orders and added more of them to him uh how about centralized autocracy yeah that applies to both of them as well militarism yes yes uh we kept all those seven wars that the left put in right and then we wound up in syria somehow as well right people don't want

to talk about that from trump and then forcible suppression of opposition oh you can chalk that one up in spades to biden and lala can't you and then belief in a social hierarchy that they have for themselves you see there's not really much difference between the two of them. They can use these labels and these names, you know, fascist, communist, or whatever. And they are all totalitarian. Now we also have major election forecasters. Trump, uh, says Trump will win on November the fifth. One of the models shows an electoral land side.

This is coming from the new american and just remember remember the 5th of november gunpowder treason and plot uh nate silver decision desk hq the hill and quantus insights forecast along with real clear politics average polls all show trump a likely winner the most lopsided forecast came from Qantas Insights, which predicts that it is going to be a landslide in the electoral college, not just that there will be a win. Related to all this, we see the alliance between the Labour Party in the UK and Lala Harris. Now, how is this allowed to continue on?

Why is this not foreign interference? And, of course, this goes back a long ways. If you go back and you look at 2016, there was, as I talked about, London Langley axis, uh, Brennan people like Gina Haspel, who Trump eventually put in as you know, the, when he became president, he put her in charge of the CIA. Now the first couple of years he had Pompeo in as the suppose it had, but the whole, she was number two and she was running the whole thing. And then they just moved Pompeo to another spot.

Just well became public about the fact that she was running everything. The woman who lied us into the Iraq war with lies about weapons of mass destruction based on torture. She covered up the torture. She destroyed the evidence. Trump made her head of the CIA. But there was this big conspiracy, all the about russiagate and everything is tied to london so um the um the democrats have been allied with london they've been allied with ukraine for quite some time um this is war musk responds to a bombshell kill twitter plot

involving uk advisors to lala harris you see it's not just that they are sending over workers paid for by the Labour Party, but now internal documents have been released that show that this is the number one thing on their agenda, was to kill Twitter. The UK's Centre for Countering Digital Hate. This is a disinformation operation from the British government. And so he retweeted the report and said this is war. Internal documents from the Center for Countering Digital Hate. His founder is a British political operative, Morgan McSweeney.

Boy, this guy sounds like a mustache twirler, doesn't he? Morgan McSweeney. It says it shows the group plans in writing. They've got it in writing. This is not, well, somebody told somebody and I have it with a good source. No, they've got the document. It shows in writing they want to kill Musk's Twitter. That's what they said. So the documents obtained by the Disinformation Chronicle and Racket show that this disinformation organization from the UK is hyper-focused on Musk.

Kill Musk's Twitter is the first item on the template of its monthly agenda. And again, it is a disinformation ally of Keir Starmer's Labor Party. It adds to the legal questions about its nonprofit status, nonprofit tax-exempt status in the U.S. Because according to the IRS, this organization could lose

its special tax status if, quote, a substantial part of its activities is attempting to influence legislation. Yet CCDH's third item on its annual priority list is to trigger EU and UK regulatory action. I don't know what the number two is. First one is kill Twitter. The next one is to trigger regulatory action to suppress free speech. And so they should not be able to have tax exempt status as a 501 C three organization. In the last two months, Washington Post and Politico, among others, have run a series of features about British advisers from labor together.

That's their campaign thing and how they want to rescue the distressed political damsel that is the Harris waltz campaign. See, they see it's got a lot of problems as well. Uh, I mean, if she's doing so well, she's got so much money and she's so popular as the mainstream media is putting it out there, um, you know, why does the labor party have to help her? Politico casts McSweeney as the election mastermind who helped Keir Starmer defeat leftist Jeremy Corbyn to become head of the Labor Party. No political operative in the Western Hemisphere is more in demand than Starmer's Rasputin. Regularly hailed as a genius much like rove the mcsweeney reputation is built more on mudslinging and

character assassination than insight into voter needs yeah as a matter of fact you know whether we look at the right or whether we look at the left it's the same thing now you get michael keaton but i think said you know they don't care what you want. They're laughing at you. All this mustache twirler McSweeney certainly is. It's all about character assassination and mudslinging. Does that kind of sound like Trump and Lala both do that kind of thing? They all do it.

Carl Rove known for doing that. But here's what Michael Keaton said. Hi, Michael. You know, for some of you folks who, guys mostly, I guess, who are thinking about attending a rally with Musk and Trump, they don't really respect you. They laugh at you behind your back. They think you're stupid. They don't want to hang out with you. They have nothing in common with you.

They're not your bros. And I'm telling you, when Trump years ago, I guess, said, I could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and they'd still vote for me, basically what he's saying in parentheses is, these people are so stupid, they're're so dumb they'd still vote for me they have no respect for you trust me yeah well you know um the people my people are so smart and you know what else they say about my people the polls they say i have the most loyal people did you ever see that where i could stand

in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters. OK, it's like incredible. Well, you know, Keaton's right about that on the Trump side. Well, he doesn't see is he thinks that Lala cares about him. He is a comedian, you know, initially. And that is funny to think that either side cares about you. That is laughable yeah he's so close he's so close to getting there what's the matter why and again so many

of the people on the right are so close to getting it as well uh so the ccdh organization this disinformation propaganda censorship organization out of the UK, was also a character in the Twitter files, notably organizing a letter from state attorneys general to the platform seeking to ban the so-called disinformation dozen over telling people the truth about COVID. And of course, that included people like RFK Jr. And so, you know, it is the disinformation doesn't, the people who will actually tell you the truth about what is happening. And I guess, you know, the number one reason they want to kill Twitter is because he's exposed what

they're all about. So in an interview with just the news, which is going to be a Trump organization, you know, again, I can't find anybody who's even-handed with this stuff. Everybody has turned into cheerleaders one way or the other. Sad. Trump said he is open to reparations fund for victims of crimes committed by illegals. Well, there you go. There's his reparations fund for victims of crimes committed by illegals well there you go there's his reparations how about that now that is um the reason he says reparations instead of restitution is because the reparations are going to be handed out by the government it's not going to be

restitution that is done by the criminals who committed the crime. And I think that is an important thing that is really missing from our so-called justice system. Justice is the key thing that is missing from our justice of restitution you know uh people look at uh mosaic law law moses eye for an eye tooth for tooth that's barbaric it's like no if you look at all of the other legal codes at the time it was um first of all it was uh moderating it's like well okay somebody you're not going to do more damage to somebody than they did uh moderating it's like well okay somebody you're not gonna do more damage to somebody than they did to you so it's about keeping a sense of proportionality but the other part of it was that it had restitution which meant that it was far better than our system you know if you harm somebody's livestock or something like that you have to pay them back. And if it's done willfully, maybe you pay them back more than just the livestock.

But you pay them back. You don't pay the state in terms of a fine. And the state was not going to lock you up in a prison. They didn't build prisons then, right? They weren't going to put you in a jail cell and have the people that you victimize pay for your upkeep. No, that wasn't,

that's not just, is it? And so, uh, we can talk about reparations and it isn't that he's using this word just to troll, uh, Lala over the racist reparations that she wants.

And again, if you're going to have people pay for the sins of their ancestors centuries ago, then of all people, she should pay the most. And now she's got billions of dollars. So why doesn't she put up a fund? Because her father bragged about the fact that they owned slaves.

Not about skin color. How many white people, as I've said before, how many white people immigrated to this country, let's say in the immigration waves of the late 1800s and early 20th century from Europe? They never owned slaves. But her family did, and they're proud of it. So why doesn't she pay reparations? Well, after spending hours comforting families victimized by murder, rape, and other border crimes,

the former president told Just the News that he's also open to creating a federal compensation fund for Americans harmed by illegal immigrants let into the country. So they make it sound like this is coming from him, and yet it isn't it's coming from them on tuesday asked tuesday whether he was open to implementing the concept of voters on november the fifth return to the white house trump answered without ambiguity i am so they ask him would you

be open to doing this this and this and this, and this? Yes, I am. Oh, well, look at that. It's like it's his idea or something. It's not his idea. He's just telling them what they want to hear. He doesn't care about you or your problems. And this is just the news. Putting this out there is like, oh, look, he wants to do it.

No, he doesn't want it. He just says, sure, yeah, of course I'll do it. It's an empty promise. Politicians make them all the time. And that's where the clip from Keaton really should come in. They laugh at you. They think you're stupid. And so does just the news.

To tell you that this is something that, A, was his idea, and B, that he's going to actually do something about it wasn't even his idea but i do think they ought to make criminals pay and i don't think they ought to pay the government they ought to pay the victims what's the matter with our system of justice you know again there should never be any fines to this when you look at these gangs for example these gangs that have been created and weaponized by drug prohibition, the failed war on drugs has gone on now for more than 50 years and has only given us more dangerous and concentrated forms of the drugs that it was supposed to eliminate. By the way, I don't know if I talked about this or not, but somebody sent me an email and said, well, you know, what about gold?

You know, you say gold, but can't they outlaw and confiscate that? Well, you know, people didn't turn in their gold. I mean, people did turn in their gold. They didn't send SWAT teams around kicking doors down and getting gold. I mean, you might look at that and say, well, maybe they would do that today, the kind of government we have today. Nevertheless, how has that worked out for drugs has drug prohibition stopped drug use you think gold prohibition is going to stop the use of gold yeah they'll go around when they find it they'll steal it or whatever but um you know not um i't know. Does it have a smell to it like the drugs do?

Can they train dogs to smell gold? I don't think so. It's going to be kind of harder for them to do something about that. But you look at the gangs, that's another aspect. First of all, you know, you look at prohibition, what does it do? It gives you a more intense form of whatever it was that you were trying to prohibit. That happened under alcohol prohibition as well. Second thing is it corrupts law enforcement

and government officials, the justice system, everything is totally corrupted by it. We've had that in spades. But the other thing is that it creates these gangs. We had Al Capone, stuff during alcohol prohibition. Look at all the drug gangs. So, you know, these MS-13, this Venezuelan prison gang,

these are all people running drugs. Well, when the government catches them, right, what does the government do? Well, it confiscates, I don't know, millions, hundreds of millions, billions, I don't know how much money he had from El Chapo. By the way, it doesn't do anything to HSBC, Hong Kong, Shanghai Bank, right?

It doesn't do anything to them. They had set up a private window just for the Sinaloa drug cartel because they had so much cash to count. They were like, nobody else can get any business now give them their own window so they can bring in all the drug money and we can count it for them you know and so uh nothing was done to hsbc but they confiscated all the assets of el chapo and they confiscate them they kept them they didn't distribute it to people who were victimized by gang violence,

people who were harmed by the drugs that they sold. No, the government keeps it. There's no restitution in our system. There ought to be, but there isn't. And you have, in the name of the war on drugs, they go around and they confiscate without even charging people with a crime, let alone finding them guilty. Civil asset forfeiture, steal your car, your home, your cash. Do they give that to you?

No, they keep it themselves. You see, what we have here, the government and the police departments and law enforcement have become, with the war on drugs, they have become just another gang. They have uniforms and titles and weapons. They're just another gang out there stealing from you. That's what the government is in general, just another gang. So this idea that you're going to get reparations for victims of crimes committed by illegals, Trump wants to talk about that. Hey, Trump, what about reparations or restitution to the people

who have been harmed by the vaccine that you're so proud of? You want to do something about that? He doesn't care a thing about you folks. Your life is cheap. And he could shoot a million of you to death with his vaccine. And you'd still vote for him, wouldn't you? Because you're doing it right now. It's just amazing.

This world we live in. To me, I look at that, and that, to me, is even more strange than the trannies out there. I mean, all this sexual obsession and possession, demonic possession, I understand that. I just can't understand the cognitive dissonance of people who know what these vaccines are about and the dishonesty and the grifting of people like Wayne Allen Root and Alex Jones and many of these others who say, Trump, stop talking, stop taking credit for the vaccine. We all know how bad it is now. Stop talking about it.

And that went on for years. He kept talking about it, and he'll still do it. If somebody brings a subject up, he'll still brag about the vaccine they used to kill people. No reparations for that drug. No reparations for that crime. The crime committed by the federal government against its own people. This is why I cannot support him or any of these people. Before we go to break, Karius Rex, thank you for the tip.

I appreciate it. I appreciate that. And Marky Mark in New Jersey. Dave, IIRC at one point in 2020, Lala polled well. At one point, she was at 12% to 15%. What did her end was a CNN debate where Gabbard flamed her. After that, Lala's campaign died out. Well, yeah, I mean, it died out because she was less than 1% at that point,

but she might have been up high. Again, I don't really care about polls. they can rig these polls any way they want but um they um that may be true i didn't go back and look at that i'm not saying that probably is true i imagine you got that right uh still she had tanked so badly and i think it was tulsi gabbard, that she had tanked so badly, she had been exposed as a fraud. And she's now been exposed as a fraud by Brett Baer and many others, right? And everybody knows that there's nothing there. A campaign about nothing. It's a Seinfeld campaign.

And she can try to laugh everything off, but there's absolutely nothing of any substance there i think everyone understands that and i think there's a lot of people in the democrat party that want to get her out of the way because they want to have an open election in four years and you know um michelle would definitely michelle obama would definitely like to be the first female president. So I think that Obama and all of his influence in the Democrat Party is kind of pulling back. M. Sellers, I had a grassroots nonprofit knock on my door yesterday. He wasn't MAGA.

Nicest guy going door to door confirming our votes for the locals running. That's the way it should be. Good, good. That is the way that, that's what we should focus on. That's really good. And I bet, if it's a grassroots nonprofit, let me know. I bet that was focused on an issue or maybe a couple of issues, right? At the grassroots, that's what people are about uh and not necessarily about the party well we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back Thank you. Making sense common again.

You're listening to The David Knight Show. Diamonds are forever They are all I need to please me They can stimulate and tease me. They won't leave in the night. I have no fear that they might desert me. Yeah, well, they're now talking about putting diamonds in the atmosphere in order to save the climate.

And they're forever. They're going to stay up there forever, right? Scientists propose shooting 200 trillion. 200 trillion. This is how you own nothing. Just turn everything over to the people who are going to save us. The people who are selling atmosphere. F-E-A-R.

Just turn everything over to them and it'll all be okay. Give them everything. Give them all your money, $200 trillion worth of pulverized diamonds into the atmosphere. Well, this is the basis, of course, yet again, of a climate model. And they said, you know, as they look at this stratospheric aerosol delivery, they evaluate a lot of different things. But here's a newsflash for them, right? We've been told that we have to turn over everything to our overlords because of carbon.

Carbon. What is a diamond? Hmm, I don't know the difference between carbon between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide and they don't even bother anymore they're just a carbon carbon carbon you got a carbon tax can i pay my carbon tax and diamonds that they'd let you uh because it's all about whatever they can get from you can they distinguish a gas from a solid even? I don't know. But, you know, this is treated as an aerosol because the other things that they were talking about were, it's not a gas, but it's an aerosol. The other things were solid substances that pulverized and injected that they modeled. Spending decades grinding up something approaching a quadrillion dollars worth of diamonds into dust and then dispersing them into the atmosphere.

Is this another grift from De Beers? You you know they're in a lot of problems here they got they just have this monopoly on diamonds and now people are making uh synthetic diamonds not just something like cubic zirconium and so they kind of lost their monopoly on that maybe this would be some way they can get back into the business in a big way. So contrary to what you might think, such an audacious idea wasn't conceived by some science fiction writer huffing fumes, but by researchers performing rigorous

scientific exercise. No, I think the first thing is true. Sci-fi writers. Sci-fi writers. That's what these climate scientists are. They're sci-fi writers. They're writing research grants, and it's pure science fiction scientists are they're sci-fi writers they're writing research grants and it's pure science fiction and they're getting paid uh tremendously well unfortunately uh and and then the breathless uh fear uh the value lies in seriously weighing all of our options

as we stare down the barrel of near certain climate doom that's right the sky is falling and i really love that they put atmospheres atmosphere that's the way we ought to always talk about climate change anymore it should always be atmos dash fear that's really good i'm gonna keep that sure it would take 45 years of non-stop injections and it would cost nearly 200 trillion dollars all the wealth on earth nearly right but the intervention would be enough to keep us just under the 2.7 degree warming threshold well they said we can't do that they They said they evaluated not just diamonds, but sulfur and a lot of other aerosols in a 3D climate model. Wow, that's impressive. You mean you did this on a computer?

Oh, wow. And you did 3D. Can you do 4D modeling? Can we get you to watch?, actually the vaccines are now being modeled on computers. They call it in silico. And, you know, you have, they talk about in vitro, that's in a glass, right? In vivo, that's when they put it in a body and they do in silico. Well, that's a computer model.

And now they're taking it another step. We're just going to have artificial intelligence design your next vaccines forget about skynet having to create terminator style robots they just kill us with their designed designer vaccines that's what the people running this whole thing is anyway they got a 3d climate model so you should be very impressed are Are you impressed? I'm not. I think it is, you know, when they look at this, they said, well, you know, it's $200 trillion. But it'll be just enough. You know, no price that we pay is too much.

Right? They're not going to pay it. We will pay it. No price that we pay is too great to save us from their atmosphere or the atmosphere if we've the fear if we've caught the fear from them so it's three 3d models and have simulated effects of using diamond sulfur and many other aerosols paying particular attention to how they coagulated or clumped together and how long they lasted in the atmosphere.

A process known as sedimentation. So, too much coagulation causes heat to be trapped in the spots. Particles need to remain diffuse for the whole plan not to backfire. That's according to their assumptions in their computer model, right? Is it right? We don't know. They haven't done any real science on it. A computer model is not real science. Real science is you've got a theory and you go out and you measure it or you reproduce this or whatever.

It needs to be reproducible. It needs to be measurable. These are computer models. As a matter of fact, the computer model that was used to shut everybody down by Trump and Fauci from the Imperial College of London, you couldn't reproduce it. Even its own model was not reproducible. How is that science, right? It wasn't based on anything that they had observed or measured. And as the University of Edinburgh pointed out, when they ran this Imperial College of London simulation with the same inputs,

every time they ran it with the same inputs, they'd get a different answer. Well, that's not a scientific model. Nothing scientific about it. It's not measurable. It's not reproducible. The pulverized diamonds really shined. They did not clump. They also stayed airborne.

With the added bonus of resisting being turned into acid rain. Sulfur, on the other hand, was the second worst of all the candidates because it tended to clump a lot. But sulfur is basically free, so that's what they're going to use. It clumps, turns into acid rain, doesn't stay airborne very long. But let's use it anyway. It's kind of like these people working on the nuclear bomb. You know, this could ignite the atmosphere and kill us all. Let's use it anyway. It's kind of like these people working on the nuclear bomb. You know, this could ignite the atmosphere and kill us all. Let's do it anyway.

This war with Russia, as they said in 2022, there's about a 50% chance it'll set off a worldwide nuclear war. Let's do it anyway. Sulfur remains our best option, even though it wasn't the best option. It was the second worst option. We can readily examine the effects on a large scale by looking at volcanic eruptions. Oh, you mean natural weather?

Mm-hmm. Yeah, if it's a land volcano, you get the sulfur that's put up there and stays up there for a while. Cools things off on the other hand if it is an underwater volcano it puts up water and that hunga tonga thing um was underwater and it increased by 15 percent the water vapor and the water vapor is like 99 of the atmosphere co2 is only 0.4 percent so you take a 15 increase in greenhouse gases right and so you take a 15 increase in greenhouse gases and so we had a small increase in temperature so what we're all just fine uh it's interesting to explore these other materials they said but if you ask me what's going to get deployed it's going to be sulfate

well what about aluminum and the other things that the aluminum barium things like that they're already injecting up there with chemtrails. They don't mention that. But we're continuing to chip away at the huge question marks around the deliberately tampering with our climate. They have a group called the Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering. Just. Whenever you see that there, right?

Like social justice um but uh you know when they look at this and they say well uh all of this is this a tacit admission that the sun is responsible for our climate yeah i think so and yet they are still obsessed with co2 this is why i had our guest on the other day because he's talking about the benefits of CO2. I mean, he even thinks that it's warming. He doesn't think that it's man-made, but he thinks the climate is warming. But he said, hey, that's fine. You know, CO2 is great. But they are determined to get rid of it. And so they have come up with a substance out of the university of

California and Berkeley, half a pound of this powder can remove as much CO2 from the air as a tree. So the problem is the tree does other things. Um, you know, uh, the tree provides shade, but most importantly,

these plants absorb CO2 and give off oxygen. It was a system that was designed by somebody much wiser than the Berkeley scientists. It was designed by God. And so, you know, when you get more CO2, the plants grow more and they grow faster. And then they release more oxygen and it's a self-regulating system they're symbiotic but no if you put out this stuff what it was going to do is just take co2 out of the air and we need co2 we need co2 in the atmosphere this is what is really concerning is how hell-bent these atmosphere people are in terms of trying to geoengineer co2 out of the air we need that 0.04 percent but they're talking about this powder uh the powder could be deployed

to the kinds of large scale direct air capture plants that are starting to come online to reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere. Again, is this diamonds? Is it CO2? Is it CO, carbon monoxide? Keeping the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide below 450 parts per million is necessary to limit global warming to 2 degrees. And you know that? You so wise in the ways of science you know that exactly how oh by your computer models that's right by superstition and ignorance that's how you know that that is not science even if we stop emitting co2 we still need to take it out of the air and we don't have any other options but to take it out of the air this is crazy this is crazy but you can see this coming as bill gates turned on trees oh trees are bad

we got first you paid me to plant trees now we got to get rid of the trees we got to cut them down um they're opening a door into a new family of approaches, said one of these people. No, what they're doing is they're opening Pandora's box. The person, I thought this was interesting. The person who put this together at the University of California, Berkeley, a chemist working on his PhD,

the guy's name was Zuzu. It was actually Z-I-h-u-i so the first name may be zaihui zoo but i just call him zuzu because you know every time they grab some co2 an angel gets his wings did you know that uh these people you just need to laugh at them. It's just, ridicule is the most effective weapon, folks. And these people, what they're telling us is laughable. And it's time for us to start laughing at them. The Pentagon, meanwhile, wants to flood social media with fake AI people. Well, why not?

Because, you know, the internet was designed by the Pentagon, right? DARPA within the Pentagon, the Defense Advanced Research Projects people, DARPA, a psychologist in the 1960s, J.C.R. Licklider, the Intergalactic Computer Network, they shortened it up to Internet and it became practical in the 1990s. And then all the spook organizations jumped into it. CIA even created its own public venture capital firm. But if you look at the other venture capital firms, they had CIA and NSA people all over the boards of those venture capital firms. And so the Pentagon created social media. So why wouldn't they want to flood it with fake AI people? It's been a psyop from its inception. And that's what this is all about.

It's about that, and it's about surveillance, and it's about propaganda, and it's about censorship. That's what AI is. The internet was about that, and that was their ultimate goal with the internet. And their ultimate goal with AI is surveillance, censorship, propaganda. Pentagon-operated AI personas might be coming to an Internet forum near you. As The Intercept reports, a wish list put forward by the Joint Special Ops Command, JSOC,

reveals the agency's interest in using generative AI to create fake online Internet users. Look, it's already there. It's already there. They paid people to be fakes. They paid people to be bots, and now they can just weaponize this with artificial intelligence. And this is why they are going to move heaven and earth to make sure they've

got enough power requirements for AI. If that means that you don't have anything, if it means that they got to temporarily ignore all of their atmosphere, they will do that. Despite the U S government's persistent warnings that deep fakes and other AI generated content will deepen the misinformation crisis and lead to a muddier information ecosystem for everyone, that's what they're doing. See, it's deep fake for me, but not for thee. These, by the way, they want to crack down like Gavin Newsom did.

They want to crack down on jokes and satire? Yeah, but they can do whatever they want. They're serious about this stuff. JSOC explains that it's seeking, quote, technologies that can generate convincing online personas for use on social media platforms, social networking sites, and other online content. It shouldn't be hard to do something that's more believable than Laura Loomer. The solution, they said, should include facial and background.

Yeah, hopefully not with that level of plastic surgery. Facial and background video and audio layers. JSOC wants their agents to use this capability to gather information from public online forums. The internet, Facebook, social media, I think. They've always been about creating a permanent record. They've always been about total information awareness from the very beginning. It's always been about creating a life log on you. That was what they call their project. And then, you know, shut it down.

Facebook opens up. JSOC wants to provide its special ops teams with technology to create sophisticated bespoke AI deep fakes capable of convincing social media users that they're the real deal for the sake of information gathering efforts. It's all about surveillance, lies, and censorship. Or you can say propaganda. SPC. The DoD's continued focus on AI as a way to level up its digital surveillance and its influence efforts, propaganda, is a noteworthy development in the approach to online intelligence operations.

These people, they have no problem with it. The Intercept reported last year that the Pentagon expressed interest in deepfakes as a means of improving and expanding influence efforts no problem with it the intercept reported last year that the pentagon expressed interest in deep fakes as a means of improving and expanding influence efforts run by the dod's special operations command in 2023 they wrote that they sought quote more encompassing disruptive unquote techno technologies that were larger in scope than the tools they had then just like fauci said we got to do it from the inside we got to do it with disruption and we got to do it iteratively and that's what they're doing uh and then this is a left-wing rag that doesn't really have too much problem with it so they say

well you know project 2025 a blueprint for a trump presidency pinned by dozens of his close allies salivates over the prospect of using ai to expand surveillance and spying efforts again it's amazing to me and they just keep going back to this project 2025. he's denounced it uh i think they you know heritage foundation fired some of the people put that stuff together. But I was not aware. Maybe this is true. Maybe it's not.

They're talking about using AI to expand surveillance and spying effort. But of course, we all know that's what AI was for. It doesn't matter whether the left or the right is in power, the Republicans or the Democrats. It doesn't matter who's in power. They're going to use AI to surveil you to censor you and to propagandize you this is not this is another issue another area where they're both in agreement oh you got to do it to keep people safe you got to do it for national security and on and on they said well this is going to lead to a society where it is increasingly difficult to ascertain truth from fiction

and muddling the geopolitical sphere do you not realize that we're there already yeah of course we we don't have that problem now do we an intern has been fired by tiktok for sabotaging its ai model now they didn't give the name of the intern but i think it was john connor uh or maybe sarah connor i don't know because as i said before it's the ai models and this other stuff not you know the terminator. It's the AI models that are far more dangerous. We need a John Connor. We need a Sarah Connor who are going to blow up these AI models. So good for them.

This intern maliciously interfered with the model training tasks. Good. ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, fired an intern who apparently screwed with the company's AI projects. The social media firm has confirmed that the unnamed commercial team intern, you don't have a first name, last name's just Connor, was terminated in August after he messed, oh, so it's got to be he. It's not Sarah.

It's got to be John. Messed with ByteDance AI models. The intern involved maliciously, interfered with the model training. We were putting together our own lies and he put in another set of lies. How about that? It is weapon.

It is a weapon. They're weaponizing this AI against us, folks. While the company did not say which AI project or projects the intern sabotaged, it could be one of at least 11 that it operates. While the statement sounds plausible enough, commentators on ByteDance's post are, as Ars notes, calling BS on it. They said the malicious code was used to deliberately sabotage the training for several months for several months but said that didn't harm

anything else they said it just with several months of research in vain but did not affect the main product line well keeping that in mind, take a look. And I'm going to jump over here to this thing, Karen. This is in news. And I want to go to the last article in here. This is coming from Mark Andreessen, who is one of the big billionaire venture capitalists, right? They call him a billionaire investor. Well, he's a venture capitalist who pours money into these tech firms. And he said that the fight over AI censorship is going to be the most important fight we have for the next 30 years. You see, that's where this is.

That's all I say. This is where John connor's and uh john connor and sarah connor need to focus um the ai censorship wars he said will likely be the biggest political battle over the next three decades they ask him in the interview what's your take on censorship where are we culturally and what's ai's role going to be in either breaking us free of censorship or using that to really tighten things down? And he said, well, I'm 100% pro free speech. He says, I don't want terrorist recruitment anymore than anybody else.

But should people be able to talk about their politics online without getting censored? 100% full range of expression, of course. That's the American way. So I'm 100 100 on that he said the internet companies ran into a variety of externally and self-inflicted situations where they ended up being a pervasive censorship machine for a long time that was fascism that was a public private partnership by the way the most dramatic change of that is twitter before and after elon bought it by the way he said we're a proud member of the syndicate that bought it along with elon and so i'm very thrilled

about that well i thought that was interesting i didn't know that and i also didn't know that he was involved with substack he said we're also by the way the main outside investor in substack which i think has done a spectacular job navigating through this. They're a small company, so when pressure is brought to bear on a small company, it can really have an impact. But the team there has done a fantastic job navigating to a real freedom of speech position. And as a consequence, Substack now has the full range of views on all kinds of topics in a really good way. So the good news is we have two case studies,

Twitter and Substack, where this has gone really well. The other ones are more difficult, he said. And I think the internet social media censorship wars were the preamble to the AI censorship wars were the preamble to the AI censorship wars. I think I would call it the clone wars because that's what AI does.

AI just clones information from me. We call this the clone wars. Um, the AI censorship wars. He said, I think the AI censorship wars are going to be a thousand times more intense and a thousand times more intense and a thousand times more important.

He said, AI is going to be, I think the software layer that controls everything. It's going to be the software layer that basically tells us everything. It's going to be the software layer that teaches our kids. It's going to be the software layer that we talk to every day. And you know, as I think, you know, there's already AI censorship. This is where the war is, folks. The spiritual war, battle between good and evil, is not between Republican and Democrat,

Trump and la la. It's not in Washington. It's on the internet. It's in your mind. It's the battle between truth and lies. And if we don't hammer this into our kids and grandkids, that they should not trust this information. We have to push really hard on critical thinking. We have to push really hard on this tribalism. We have to push really hard on, well, this is science, or this is coming from a computer, or this is coming from an authoritative source, so you should believe it. If we don't push back on that, we are lost already. And I'm not very optimistic when I look at the political system out there, when I look at the Christian leaders out there, I'm not very optimistic about this at all.

The AI censorship wars. It wants to control everything. It wants to be the software layer that tells us everything. Do not trust it. Do not trust it. He said the AI censorship conflict is already underway. The war, the information war around AI is already underway. By the way, the same people who are pushing so hard for social media censorship now have shifted their focus to AI censorship.

A lot of the actual sensors, and this is Mark Andreessen. He's an insider in the venture capital Silicon Valley. He knows what's going on. A lot of the actual censors themselves who used to work at companies like Twitter, now work for the AI companies. Just take those people that Elon Musk fired and put them into an AI company to train the AI. So there's been a direct transfer of lessons learned

and now it's being applied at a larger scale and i think this is going to be a giant fight i think it is just starting i believe it's possibly the most important political fight in the next 30 years it's even more important than that it is a spiritual war folks it is a battle for your mind it is a battle for your soul and your spirit and you better pay attention better take it seriously meanwhile truth's social trump's truth social has got a lot of palace intrigue going you've got people who are talking to the new york times at least three senior truth social employees have either been fired or pushed out as complaints about the firm's ceo former gop

congressman devin nunes have reached ahead news of these departures comes after reports of a so-called whistleblower letter from staff disgruntled by devin nunez leadership truth social employees were irked by the ex-florida congressman's insistence on listen to this hiring foreign workers yeah how does that work you think uh he's mr maga right uh the? The guy, this so-called conservative Republican. These people, they have absolutely no... Just like Mike Johnson, isn't he? So Devin Nunes. Hiring foreign workers, they said,

which goes against Trump's America First ethos. The New York Times insider sources have detailed a portrait of a firm in serious disarray amid a majority owner's attempt to return to the white house. Sources said Nunes rarely shows up in person to the truth social headquarters in Sarasota, Florida that the CEO has not formally addressed staff in two years, given that he was only appointed in late 2021 and that the company has only existed since February 2022.

That's a pretty bad record. I mean, they've been around for two years and he hasn't shown up for two years. Is he here? Well, he may be doing something. He's just not addressing the employees. The employees also alleged that Nunes put too much stock and advice from unqualified members of the inner circle. Truth Social denied the New York Times claims and said that it was part of the paper's jihad against the truth and against fact-based reporting well time will tell

we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back Thank you. Thank you. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, we have a, this is an interesting headline here. Grizzly 399. Famed Yellowstone area bear killed in a wyoming car accident i saw that i didn't know bears drive i didn't uh pbs dubbed this bear the most famous grizzly in the world it was not driving at the time it was instead hit by a car and uh so uh we see a lot of uh if it bleeds it leads so if a passenger aboard a royal caribbean cruise full of taylor swift fans falls overboard now so much about that taylor swift cruise what in the world is that and this is somebody who was uh 66 uh but of course i'm not too uh not much of a

surprise because taylor swift is always falling for the wrong guy isn't she and then we have suspected drunken driver arrested after passing harris's motorcade the wrong way in wisconsin are they sure this wasn't la la? I just played for you this song. She always seems like she's drunk. Did they have her do a breath analyzer? Did they have her walk the line? 55-year-old Milwaukee man in custody after he performed poorly on a field sobriety test.

I imagine he's not going to drive for a long time. He made them feel threatened as well as being a drunk driver and then uh more serious news we have the irs unveiling new federal income tax brackets for 2025 now they only gave one example and that is the top bracket uh single taxpayers making more than 636 000 and they raised that from the top bracket being $609,000. So what they did was actually, at least for that bracket, they adjusted it about four and a half percent. And so I don't know. You can look at that and make your guess as to whether or not that is reasonable in terms of the kind of inflation that we've seen or not.

Meanwhile, this is even more ominous. We have Janet Yellen saying that they're going to close the budget deficit with IRS enforcement. Oh, wow. This is going to be very expensive to us this is going to be like grinding up diamonds and injecting it into the atmosphere isn't it um last year the irs estimated the size of the tax gap at 668 billion in the tax year of 2021 and so at the very least they're hoping that artificial intelligence and an army of irs agents is going to be able to squeeze nearly a trillion dollars out of you look i don't know where they're coming that artificial intelligence and an army of IRS agents is going to be able to squeeze nearly a trillion dollars out of you.

Look, I don't know where they're coming up with this. Of course, the difference is going to be between the annual deficit and the cumulative debt of 35 trillion. But I mean, the deficit that they're running now is at the rate of a trillion dollars every 100 days. And yet, if you look at it for the most recent period, it did that in about 20 days. So, you know, when we're looking at this, sorry, it did half a trillion in 20 days. So if you take that out to the 100 day level, we're looking at the deficit of two and a half trillion every 100 days. Not one trillion every 100 days.

So where does she come up with this 668 billion? I mean, you know, they had a deficit of nearly that in just 20 days, in the last 20 days. The key thing is, and this is what we should be concerned about, but again, these candidates are not even talking about it. Lala copied Trump's tax break for tips right but that is such that has absolutely nothing that nobody is going to do anything in terms of the 80,000 agents that are going to be hired and the and making giving the irs a budget that is seven times what its current budget is current Current budget, $13 billion. They're going to give it another $80 billion. It's insane. And so that's what they're going to use.

So Yellen was asked by Fox in an interview about how the U.S. can persuade other countries to continue to buy U.S. debt. And she said, by making sure that we stay on a sound fiscal path and one that doesn't require deficit reduction over the coming years. Well, how are you going to reduce the deficit? You're going to cut spending? You're going to raise taxes?

No, I think we can just squeeze more out of people using artificial intelligence and an army of IRS agents. This is really ominous. I told you yesterday about the fact that, well, I played the clip. U.S. Congresswoman said the IRS is looking at everybody's bank accounts. They don't have a search warrant to do it, but they're in there looking at everybody's bank accounts. So that's just the preliminary.

They're getting in there to do it, then they're going to feed all that stuff into the artificial intelligences. That kind of data mining and correlation and everything that artificial intelligence can do that's that's what they're preparing to do she then went on to explain that the biden harris administration has taken several steps aimed at lowering budget deficits by giving the irs the resources that they need to close what is estimated over the next decade to be a $7 trillion tax gap. That means that they're going to ruthlessly enforce another $7 trillion. created the legal fiction that there is a difference between laws passed by Congress and rules passed by the bureaucracy.

And if it's a rule, rather than if it's a law, they have to follow the Constitution. But the unelected bureaucracy can create rules for which the Bill of Rights offer no protection. That's what they want to tell everybody. It's a lie, but that's the prevaricating lie that they tell everybody. So with the IRS, you are guilty and you have to prove that you're innocent. They can punish you before they even have a determining factor. They can confiscate money before they even give you a trial in their own court by their own people. They write the rules, their legislature, their judiciary, their enforcement arm, all in one. Totally unaccountable. A law unto itself. And yet,

that was just the first agency to do it. They're all doing that now. They're all doing it now. But this is, I think this is going to be you know we talk about artificial intelligence the surveillance the propaganda uh the censorship uh that is a big threat but the other part of this big threat is how they're going to use ai to surveil you and to feed that over to the IRS. And so you're going to have the artificial intelligence is going to say, well, this is the amount I think that you owe. Good luck trying to get that reversed.

Right. You call up and it's like, oh, the people that they hire, I don't know anything. I can't help you with that. I don't know this. There's a lot of money that is owed under our tax laws to the Internal revenue service that isn't being collected and we're beginning to remedy that problem she explained and trump isn't going to help you on this i mean he created made the problem much much bigger with the spending and neither is lala she's more than happy to do that the republicans will pretend that they don't like this type of thing but they will do absolutely nothing to help you and so when we look at what is happening and we've talked about this in many

different ways i was just talking about how uh walgreens and cvs and rite aid you know these brick and mortar stores they're still struggling you know a lot of it is due to what happened four years ago. But in their particular case, there's also this insurance structure that is robbing them blind, even the big box retailers. But when we look at the restaurants and individuals, even if it is, you know, pretty wealthy franchise owners who are still individuals, but they're not like the mom-and-pop restaurant that starts out from scratch, even they're having difficulty staying in business. Denny's is going to close 150 restaurants over the next year. And they are also going to reduce the menu.

Denny's will be reducing the menu down from 97 items to 46 items. So your Grand Slam breakfast, you're going to have a limited. In May, Red Lobster closed over 100 locations in the U.S. And we've got restaurant bankruptcies that are piling up. TGI Fridays may be next. Who knows? Maybe they'll put out their bankruptcy on a Friday. 600 locations in 55 countries, including 233 in the U.S.

And they will file for bankruptcy protection soon, in the coming weeks. And so there's a long list of large chains going back decades. They said this year is set to come in second only to 2020 for the number of restaurant chains and operators declaring bankruptcy. Who was president in 2020? Seems like most of the conservative media can't remember who was president they can't remember who said to mom and pop retailers and restaurants and everything service businesses you're not essential shut down and they stayed shut down destroyed them all of these superstitions well you can only have you know you're you can't have more than 20 of your capacity well of, that shuts them down because they would always do most of their business on a Friday or Saturday night.

And if they can only get 20% of their business on those busy times, they can't stay afloat. Look at all the games they played with them. You know, you got to have people outside. You got to have people go and drive through. They struggle with this stuff. They got behind if they didn't close down right away in 2020. And that was the year that most of them bit the dust.

But even the ones who were able to survive Trump's lockdown when he made Fauci president. Even the ones who were able to survive that are now going under. Well, one person who's not going under is uh the billionaire widow of steve jobs you know it's amazing when these people always think back to um uh fiddle on the roof octavia says uh if i were a rich man they'd think i really know well a lot of people think that way, right? And the people who think that way, for the most part of the people who are rich, they think they really know. And this woman who did absolutely nothing to accumulate that money, she's living off the coattails of Steve Jobs. She bought the Atlantic, which is really really far left and she's talking about

her social agenda crusade yeah one generation that makes the money another one that spends it for their own fantasies or in this particular case you know the surviving spouse lauren powell jobs widow of steve jobs uh said she purchased she purchased the Atlantic to create narratives that she thinks will build a more just and equal society. She was sitting next to Lala Harris when she described her agenda to control what information people should have access to. They are, you know, this is the mindset of these wealthy people. And I really do find it concerning how now the people, they kind of always remain in the back. And you do have a lot of these billionaire investors, of course, remaining in the back as they donate tens or hundreds of millions of dollars

to these two candidates. And yet they're now coming out in front because they just know better than you what you should be doing. It's amazing. Well, Mad Mim, thank you very much for the tip. Because I'm very pleased to say that Dr. Shiva made right in for Missouri. Bottoms up movement is the way to fix the problems. I agree with that and i like see i like what dr shiva is doing because he's running for president um to tell people

that the presidency is not going to fix your problems right uh and i 100 endorse that message i really do like see that's what it ought to be used for. That's why I talk about politics here. It's to tell you that the presidency is not going to fix your problem. Yeah, you should be interested in politics because politics is interested in you, whether you are or not. And you should understand where the threats are so that you can do things that are going to be effective. And it's not effective to think that you've done your job and you go down and check a box for president. But that's all they want you to do and they want you to be so hyper focused on that that you don't see all the real things that you could be doing that are going to make a difference in your life outside of politics

and all the things that you could be doing with your family with your community with all these other things they don't want you to see that. And so Shiva does. And so he's trying to educate people, not trying to fleece them, you know, as, as Trump does. And,

you know, all these politicians do send me your money. So I absolutely agree with that. And I think that's great. I don't know if he's on a right end in Tennessee. If you know, let me know. I don't even know what the write-in is but uh whether they count it or not i'm going to write something else in there i looked at the ballot like i said

when i had uh joel scousen on i said yeah there's a green party there's two people who are kind of independent but they identify as communist literally yeah they all made the ballot and then there's lala and trump and that's it's pretty sad to see that it's uh you know if it wasn't down ballot stuff i was interested in i wouldn't even bother to show up uh but um you know and and when you talk about the constitution party i had joel scousen on you know he i thought that maybe randall ter you know, I'm all in favor of him running ads. You know, Joel Skousen didn't like that idea. I think that is true. You know, when you say, well, it really offends people.

Well, they should be offended by pulling, you know, they don't, people don't know what abortion is. You need to show them what that is. I know they get offended by it. It gets people very angry to see babies ripped apart. So don't rip babies apart, right? And you won't have to get angry about that. But you should never become so anesthetized

that it doesn't make you angry to see that happening. See, that's the truth. If people see the truth, they have a visceral reaction to that horror. And I think that needs to be shown to people. I don't think we ever need to run away from the truth. Yeah, I would focus more on the positive message of this is a baby. This baby could survive.

We were just talking about it, um, uh, Travis and his wife, uh, their baby is already bigger than my daughter's baby was when she was born earlier this year. I mean, this year we're going to wind up, um, God willing with, um, two grand babies. And, um, so, um, he's already bigger. So, you know, at this point, he'd probably survive on his own. But, you know, how in the world? We need to show people the reality of babies in a positive way. But we also need to show them what a horror abortion is and never run from that.

But, you know, I've reached out to Randall Terry. He doesn't respond to anything it's kind of crazy um the whole thing so he's not running any ads didn't even manage to make it on the ballot in tennessee i don't understand that i mean it's there must be something else because i think that unless they just don't think it's an important state to be on because it's so rabidly trump i mean it's like you know 75 trump and drive up and down and uh and the gottlandberg area the pigeon forge area and everything and it's like there's one trump store after the other and it's like oh my people would tar and feather me if they knew i was um but uh yeah so i don't know what's up with that but um i do like the message of dr shiva

uh high verbal says bottom has fallen out of the diamond market the only way it's to dump their diamonds put them in the atmosphere uh the merchants cooked up this atmosphere scam to sell their rocks to the government yeah that's right uh sam miller one two three teachers are already struggling to keep the kids from using ai to complete their schoolwork and it's already everywhere yeah for love of the road thank you for the tip it says uh lala is giving away the heritage foundation pdf at trump's project 2025.com i couldn't find where it pushes for jailing people over abortion. It's just fear-mongering BS from the liberals by the looks of it.

That's why this other thing, too, about the surveillance stuff and everything and using AI, I seriously doubt that's in there as well. I mean, I don't know the people at heritage foundation even uh think much about ai they're not really kind of forward looking uh and you know when all this stuff was happening in 2018 and trump uh didn't uh support um info wars as they were being de-platformed as i was being de-platformed he did nothing about it. He had a Rose Garden meeting and he brought in the Cato Institute, biggest libertarian think tank, and he brought in Heritage Foundation,

the biggest conservative think tank. And they were all like, well, hey, you know, corporations can do whatever they want. If a corporation wants to kick you off the public square, they can do that. Well, that's not what the supreme court said in 1946 it disgusted me to see how the heritage foundation and um and it's like you know don't you don't you know cato and heritage don't you know that the censorship is coming from the government we said at the time and then when the twitter files came out they go oh you mean that came from the government? Who knew, right?

Well, Trump knew. That's why he didn't have anybody who was censored there. He had people who were going to tell you, well, corporations are like people. Corporations can do anything they want. No, corporations are creatures of the government, of all things. They operate by privilege. People are created by God, not by government. And because we're created by God, we have inalienable rights, but not corporations. And these corporations

should have been given the death penalty if they did that type of thing. Angela Oswald, thank you for the tip. Curious which Christian leaders, past or present who have influenced your walk with christ i would like to start listening to some but disappointed with the direction they are leading christians well i'll just say this i you know um when i was talking to um when we're talking about uh career and things like that and uh I mentioned Oz Guinness when I was talking to David Bonson and and I thought David Bonson I really I've got a tape of him debating an atheist he was brilliant but he was only like you know in his early 40s when he died he always had a heart issue or something like that and he died

suddenly so David Bonson who who I interviewed, that was his father, Greg Bonson. If you are curious and are kind of leaning towards God, but maybe you're still an atheist and you've got questions about it, you should hear the debates by Greg Bonson. I'm sure you can find him somewhere on the Internet still. They're pretty famous. I like that a great deal um and and then you know there are things from c.s lewis that i like but i don't endorse all of his theology you know you have to look at these things and uh with a you know with the bible as a standard and so from that standpoint i would recommend the bible first and

foremost you know read the bible you can read some other stuff there, but always check it against the Bible and make the Bible your primary resource. And I would recommend things like the book of John. Isaiah I've always found to be a really wonderful, uplifting book and Psalms and things like that. But there's just so much wisdom there. And sometimes it's helpful to see people distill things like that. But I'm reluctant to talk about people because every time you talk about and the atmosphere atmosphere that we live in it's the christians can behave very much like the black lives matter people you know you got a statue up

of some guy who was being honored because he did something honorable and something that laid a foundation of good into western civilization they'll go back and they'll find something in his life and say, ah, tear his statue down, right? And Christians do that all the time with somebody that you pull out. For example, I talk a lot about George Mueller. And I think it'd be good for you to go back and look at his diary because the purpose of his diary was not to tell you some theology, but it was about, the reason he kept the diary was because he wanted people to see that God was alive and present in his life and still acting today. The Bible is not some dead book from millennia ago. It's alive, and it tells us about a living God.

And you could see that in his faith. Now you can go back and you can look at, you know, George Mueller. He was one of the Plymouth Brethren, which was pushing Darbyism, which I don't agree with dispensationalism from a theological standpoint at all. But his Christian life that he was, you know, we don't have to have perfect theology. You know, error that we have in our theology, just like sin that is in our life, God is constantly purging that, and we're never going to get things 100% right, do things for exactly the right motivation, even if we do the right things. And we are many times going to have the wrong theology.

We'll be proud about our theology, even if we've got the right theology. So I don't discount George Mueller because he was part of the Plymouth Brethren, and I don't like Darby's theology. And so you can learn from his experiences. And what you can learn from his experiences was how God was active and present in his life because of that detailed diary. So things like that I would suggest that you look at. But always, you know, I don't say just keep an open mind and just say, well, nothing matters.

It does matter. And whenever you have an error, it has consequences. But, you know, his eschatology that he got, his dispensationalism, did not affect at all what he was talking about in his life. And so he had a very close walk with God. Everybody could see that in his life, in his diary. And, you know, we should all have such a close life, such a close walk with God. I want to take a quick break.

And do we have Tony? Oh, okay. We haven't connected the establishment with him yet? Okay. Okay. oh okay we haven't connected the establishment with him yet okay um uh okay so before we go to break uh and we are going to go to break here in a moment amos pool thank you very much that is very generous thank you so much um and angela oswald thank you for the tip as well curious oh that's the one i just read um who said she was disappointed in the direction that many of these people are leading Christians. And again, like I said, C.S. Lewis, he's got some wonderful insights and some other things, but he's not infallible.

And so I would just say that about all of these people. But there are things that you can learn from them. Just make sure that the Bible is your standard. That's the key thing. Well, we're going to take a break. And again, thank you very much is your standard. That's the key thing. Well, we're going to take a break. And again, thank you very much, Amos. I really do appreciate that. We're going to take a break, and we will be right back. Thank you. you're listening to the david knight show Well, Japan has dropped a bombshell, exposes a 4,900% spike in heart failure for the people who got the COVID vaccine. Scientists have discovered the risk of heart failure surges by up to 4,900%.

We're talking about 50 times, essentially, folks. After a person receives a COVID injection, the explosive discovery was made by a team of japanese researchers at yokohama general hospital they found the risk of myocarditis is 20 to 50 times greater after receiving the shot and that's why i guess it is now a household word. We're supposed to believe, as Fauci said, it's rare. Well, if it's rare, how did myocarditis and pericarditis, which were unheard of, how did they become household words? As I said before, I remember the first time I saw them, I had to look up, how do I pronounce that?

They calculate reporting odds, ratios, Supporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the odds ratio was 95%. Confidence interval was also 95%. And the association between the vaccines and myocarditis and pericarditis based on data from the Japanese government's vaccine adverse event database. We've known this from day one. We could see this was happening in December of 2020. The inflammation of the heart internally, myocarditis or pericarditis, the perimeter of it. The team analyzed official data from April of 2004 to December of 2023.

So over a 20 year time period, they saw this go up by a factor of 20 to 50 times. The risk for most cardiovascular events is reduced after COVID-19 vaccination. Wait a minute. Who said that's exactly the opposite? Well, this is coming from Microsoft News. It's coming from Health Day. This is the American media,

and they're lying to you. i said the researchers in japan saw this as 20 to 50 times more cardiovascular risk and yet these people are saying that the covet 19 vaccination reduces your risk of cardiovascular event. This is the most amazing lie I have seen. Why? I tell you, with everything that we know, for them to come out with this, we found decreased risks of several serious cardiovascular outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination.

Several authors disclosed, however, ties, and they don't say however. This is the very last line of the article they buried this several authors disclosed ties to pharmaceutical companies including astrazeneca and pfizer so they will lie for them and that's what they're doing when it goes up by factor of 50 they tell you that it goes down. Why? Because they're brought to you by Pfizer. Speaking of which, I had a friend sent this to me. He said, look at what they're doing here.

He says, I just got this from Kroger. Sent me this ad. Takes us $20 off of groceries until November the 3rd if you get a flu vaccine and another vaccine. So get two vaccines and you save $20. Boy, I tell you, they don't, they think we're

really stupid and poor. They can't even get it up to significant bribe, right? It's amazing. How to remove fluoride from your water at home. Maybe you could get it up to a significant bribe right it's amazing how to remove fluoride from your water at home maybe you could get it removed by the government who knows uh when grand rapids michigan became the first city to add fluoride to its water in 1945 it was hailed as a major public innovation aimed at preventing cavities but now we all know the truth don't we unless

you're getting your news from mainstream media you know the truth and why was it put in there in 1945 it was put in there because it was industrial waste from the nuclear industry i mentioned that yesterday when we're talking about how france is now going to start recycling uh stuff from you know radioactive material from nuclear power plants into cooking utensils and to doorknobs and all these other types of things. It's amazing that these corporations and government can do that type of stuff to us. Then they talk about, well, how do you get the fluoride out? And again, when we look at we look at this it never made any sense that you would ever medicate anybody for anything through the through the

water supply even if it was known to be safe and effective it's not going to be safe or effective if the dosage isn't right if the dosage is too low it's not going to be effective if the dosage is too low, it's not going to be effective. If the dosage is too high, it's not going to be safe. That's the case if something is really good. Well, there was a lot of research for a long time showing the fluoride was not good for us. And even if it was, why would you put it in the water supply? Even if it was evenly distributed, do you really want a baby to have the same amount of fluoride that a 200-pound man gets? None of this made any sense. But when they start talking about how to remove fluoride from water at home, and this article goes through a lot of different things. It said, well, you can

have reverse osmosis system. That'll filter out about 84% of the fluoride, or you can have activated alumina filters, which is really good. Berkey's PF2, they said, can remove up to 97%, requires no plumbing or electricity. However, there are concerns that small amounts of aluminum may be released into the water and these alkaline conditions, under alkaline conditions, these filters may leach harmful aluminum fluoride complexes. So again, an issue with that. But this is the one that I thought was interesting. I got bone char filters. They said bone char is another distinct option for filtering fluoride

from drinking water made from crushed animal bones heated in a kiln under low oxygen conditions. Bone char naturally absorbs fluoride and other contaminants, such as heavy metals, making it an effective filtration tool. Bone char's ability to trap fluoride raises an important question. If animal bones can absorb fluoride so effectively, what impact might fluoride have on bones in our own bodies? Well, we know that. It's called fluorosis. You can see it.

That's why I don't even buy that it's good for our teeth when you look at fluorosis. But again, one of the most effective ways to remove it out of your water is to put animal bones in because the bones suck up fluoride. Fluoride doesn't belong in our medicine. It doesn't belong in our water unless they're trying to harm us. So it said 99% of fluoride lives in the bones, they said.

So I don't know, when we're looking at the harm from levofloxacin and these other fluoride-based antibiotics like Cipro. Maybe that's the issue. Maybe it's in the bones, which is what is happening. Children living in areas with high fluoride levels and drinking water experience more bone fractures, especially in the arm and elbow. Bone char filters work through absorption. However, its filtration lifespan

can be unpredictable it can vary with fluoride levels and it requires regular monitoring and replacement so you know every there's not a good solution except to just stop putting it in the water that's the key thing they said even filters claiming to remove 98% of a contaminant may be insufficient if the contaminant levels in the source water are particularly high. Again, you know, look at how they have freaked out. And I think rightfully so are the lead pipes, right? It does have an effect on IQ, but we knew the same thing about fluoride. Why would they pay so much attention to lead everywhere and completely ignore the fluoride? Well, now we know.

Well, Tony is ready. We've got Tony on the line. So we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back. Stay with us. ¶¶ © BF-WATCH TV 2021 Thank you. ¶¶ Defending the American Dream. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, welcome back, and we're glad to get Tony on. We had some problems with the Zoom link that we sent to him, and Karen's been running back and forth doing a great job, Karen,

getting all this stuff together. So we got Tony on finally, and I really did want to talk to Tony because this has been a busy week. I mean, besides the stuff that's been happening with gold now for several weeks, hitting all-time highs and everything, bricks is going on as well. And, of course tony is um has wise wolf gold and he has set up david knight got dot gold david knight dot gold that'll take you to wise wolf uh he will help you to get gold or silver small or large amounts and he has something

that is really unique that's wolf pack and you can sign up for that and decide that you want to save x amount of dollars per month. He's got several different levels. They're starting as low as $50 a month, and you can start accumulating gold and silver on a gradual, regular basis. And at the same time, you get a group buy, the power of a group buy as part of that group. He's got over a thousand people in there. Maybe it's a lot more than that now. I don't know but uh so joining us now is tony artaban of wise wolf gold thank you for joining us tony glad to get you always great to be here david good to see you good to see you uh what's going on with bricks i mean this is um the stars are realigning here aren't they there's a rebalance of power

geopolitically across the globe and uh as the dollar wanes, BRICS grows in power and influence. You see Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, now Saudi Arabia and other periphery nations meeting in Russia. Vladimir Putin is calling for a cross-border payment system to supplant the SWIFT system that's currently dominated by the West and the United States, really, with something called the bricks bridge and Again, it's not about the bricks coming up with their own currency. I think that's a little misleading I think it's really about what I've been saying is cross-border payment systems

They're about the resetting of commodity prices, especially in gold That's why you see them continually buy so much gold, breaking all these records with central banks ordering gold. The United States is not buying gold. Canada is not buying gold. The West in general is staying out of that. And I think you're seeing all that power and influence drift towards the BRICS nations. This is going to be the trend. D-dollarization continues, David. Oh, yeah. Yeah. It's absolutely amazing. Of course, I saw this other thing about BRICS pay. They said they've had it around for a while but they've they've tweaked that they put out some videos about that also they're they're moving you know uh putin and uh of course china

took the lead in all this stuff in terms of cbdc and and things like that so um it's not like they are you know some good guys over there it's that, it's just that you've got these different power centers that are there that are, that are rising up and, uh, making a big leaps with, uh, the bricks nation as more and more people are coming over to them.

And, uh, now they've already busted the petro dollar, uh, Saudi Arabia, uh, you know, doing,

um, who had supported the U S dollar and dollar and helped to make it the reserve currency for cross-border payments for commodities and everything with the petrodollar. Now they are, everybody, the Chinese and the Saudis and the Russians are accepting a payment, and their native currencies are in gold. That's right. And, of course, the BRICS bridge system that Vladimir Putin is talking about would be utilized blockchain token technology to do that.

And it could be backed by gold, could be other commodities, whatever that nation is rich in. But it'd be cross-border payments and settled in real time. Just trying to get away from the Western system. I saw something that Trump said, I think this last week. And he said, if I see a country that wants to dump the dollar, I'll just call them up and tell them that I'll put 100% tariff on whatever they send into our country. And I thought about that. I'm wondering, did he not get the memo that whoever is running this country gave up, is giving up the dollar? It's a controlled demolition of the dollar.

We didn't stop the Saudis from drifting away from their 50-year agreement with the petrodollar. We've weaponized the dollar we haven't stopped we didn't stop the uh saudis from drifting away from their 50 year agreement with the petrodollar we've weaponized the dollar it doesn't there is no wisdom and now you talk about janet yellen earlier saying they can close the the funding gap through through raising taxes that's insanity uh you you know you quote the i mean just looking at real time it's not it's no longer longer a trillion dollars every 90 days. It's you. Like you said, it's like two point three trillion dollars. That's right. It's the it's the amount of money that Donald Rumsfeld lost at the Pentagon every month. There's there's something there's something else going on here.

I don't think it's just economics or I think this is a this is a plan um that's uh being carried out and the leaders of this country completely abandon it um i don't think there is any strategy here no um john f kennedy i think he wrote a book uh before he got it sometime when i think he was in congress um it was called why britain slept i think and it was about appeasement and uh the lead up to world war ii uh it's it's very similar it's like um the sleep at the wheel is what i'm watching like there's nothing going on in the west other than just um self-sabotage but it looks to be on purpose david as we see just um you and i were talking off air there's something interesting going on geopolitically. It's not in the headlines, but Saudi Arabia and Iran

are set to hold joint military exercises in the Red Sea. This was supposedly brokered by China. And so the resetting of the grand chessboard worldwide is going on, and we're still playing, I think think an outdated game it's uh that's losing yeah and that's surprising because you know we all think um so many people think that islam is monolithic uh but there are two different strains of islam you know the saudis are wahhabists and the iranians are they shia or sunni yeah yeah and so you know that's been a part of, that's why the Arabs are fighting each other, right? Is because of these different strains of Islam.

And the fact that they would bridge together and become allies over that, that is very unusual. And again, there's something, the Saudis, with the lapse of the petrodollar agreement, the 50-year agreement with the United States, the Chinese filled the gap andollar agreement, the 50-year agreement with the United States, the Chinese filled the gap and had proposed a petroyuan, which is supported by Russia. These things start to make more sense to me. We look at the passing of the US dollar and the hegemonic dominance of US military in the Middle East, and somebody's filling that role. That looks to be China. And of course, Russia in that periphery so there's something else going on here and it has to do with our currency um and it's on the chopping block of being used and utilized and uh these other countries want away

from the system especially the swift system of the payment settlements yeah so that's this is um huge well weaponized by Biden. And what is Trump's thing? Trump wants to bully everybody, right? You better not do this. I'm going to, you know, like you said, 100% tariff. You know, you're going to build your factories here. You're not going to be able to import your products or anything. That kind of thuggish intimidation is just going to accelerate the decline of the influence of America, I think.

But getting back to iran and saudi arabia uh the yemen war i thought that the uh yemen hooties weren't they supplied by iran i mean they've been fighting all this time and here it is a proxy war yeah i know i mean we were backing the the house of sod in yemen and uh the iranians were backing the hootie rebels right and i mean this is something that's been as genocide and there's uh so now what happens exactly now let's break out there with uh yemen and saudi arabia or what i mean that's crazy and of course we we oppose iran mostly because of their ties to russia if you go back historically you know even like the yalta conference was held in it's iran and you know that's uh churchill stalin fdr um the big power moves that were made that's this is going back

uh you know decades and decades going back to the end of world war ii the periphery and the influence of of russia in iran was massive and that's a the whole point of operation ajax and overthrowing mozadeq and all that in the 1950s. The real, you know, the first overthrow done by the fledgling agency that is known as the CIA that was done, you know, in 1951, I think. They've got such a great track record, don't they? Look at the monster they created, you know? From MKUltra to Operation Ajax, it's all good at the CIA. This is something that we're watching, I think, it's just, it defies logic.

I mean, the whole thing's being reset, old lines are being redrawn, and we're, again, this is sleep at the wheel. Yeah. There's something up with our policy. Well, I think there is, in the West, there is an active sabotage that is going on. And you can see it with energy, which includes the oil stuff and everything. But you can see it with what they're doing to our grid. You can see it with what they're doing to manufacturing and everything. It's a deliberate policy of starvation of energy, starvation of food, moving manufacturing

to China. These people are traitors that are running our countries. And it's not just America. It's all the Western countries. They have betrayed their own people. And if you start talking about doing things for your own people, if you're Canadian and you start talking about helping a Canadian politician, you want to help Canadians. Or an American politician wants to help Americans. Or a German politician wants to help Germans.

Oh, you're a fascist. You're an ultra-nationalist. These are the kind of labels that are thrown out there. But the people that we have in charge in all these different countries, they hate us. They're trying to destroy our country just like they were part of the depopulation agenda that was going through. So there's no question that's happening. But then there's also the other issue. And I guess we should maybe take some dark joy in, some schadenfreude.

When Powell cut rates by an emergency 50 basis points, did he expect that yields would be 50 basis points higher a month later? That's the zero-edge headline. In other words, they're pulling all these lovers and all these tricks and everything to try to get things going and a lot of the stuff that they're trying to do is not actually working and it's backfiring and so you know that that is an element of hope i think that these people are not capable of necessarily of pulling off their their schemes that are there to harm us that's right well that's that's another reason you continue to see gold hit new all-time highs and i don't i

can't even track any i think it's like 35 times in the last uh nine months this continues yeah to break all-time highs where is it value in the marketplace mean, how do you find value in a marketplace? How do you find value in a world where it may be the GDP to debt may be a parody? It may have reached that where you have about $350 trillion in debt worldwide, maybe possibly $400 trillion in assets. And I don't even believe that because most of that's based off of currency and fake currency and markets where, you know, you and I both know a lot of these companies aren't profitable. Wall Street is a joke compared to what it was 50 years ago. There is no sound, you know, accounting anymore of anything. This is not based off of production or not based off of profit. So who knows anymore? I mean, the unintended consequences of lowering the interest rates 50 basis points, well, that's what it is. You don't really know. It's not the market's asking for inflation.

And that's what's so unhealthy. They're asking for the cheap liquidity injection. And that's what's continuing to drive the purchasing power and purchasing strength of the dollar down every time they do that. And, yeah, there may be a short uptick in the economy. And I think that's why they did it so close to the election. You were talking about James Carville earlier in the show as you opened up the show. He's famous for saying it's the economy stupid and uh you know going off of you know the existing regime

existing administration always does okay if the economy's sailing along look at you know clinton in the 90s and i think that's one of the reasons why they they pulled this card it's hard to tell anymore though like you know you have some great analysis on what is what are the powers that b won out of this election it's hard to tell they definitely did that they lowered the the interest rates it was more than most analysts thought it was supposed to be 25 they went to tell. They definitely did that. They lowered the interest rates. It was more than most analysts thought. It was supposed to be 25. They went to 50. But the unintended consequences, because of the underlying weaknesses in our financial

system, I think they didn't really see this coming. It's not exactly the smart set that runs the levers of the Federal Reserve. And see, that's the thing. When they start pushing the buttons and putting in the control rods and stuff like that, and completely opposite things happen. We had the interest rate for homes went up. So when this kind of stuff starts happening, it's like, whoa. But I just thought of something when you talked about James Carville and his,

it's the economy's stupid. It's interesting that that was not one you know, I just thought of something when you talked about James Carville and his it's the economy stupid. It's interesting that that was not one of his three points that he made. I know. Yeah. She's going to win because, look, it's the economy stupid. No, it's just she's stupid. I mean, that's why I don's stupid it's really stupid i thought that the third thing there that you know well i think it's going to be lala harris because uh you know trump has divided everybody i

think it's going to be trump because i think that's exactly what they want but you know you were talking about the entire um world economy 400 trillion dollars maybe oh you could take uh and and you said well it's probably not that much knows? We might still be able to get the $200 trillion so that we can grind up diamonds and put them in and save the world. The World Bank has lost track of $41 billion handed out for climate ideologies. And you're talking about how, you know, the control of this stuff is nobody knows what's happening with it. They said the people who are trying to analyze this, and that's about 40% of what they've spent on climate giveaways. And they said, we looked at this stuff and it's incredibly complicated, but it also doesn't add up.

And they don't even have any way as complicated to send them this tremendous amount of information, kind of like trying to hide a needle in a haystack, right? So they send them a haystack of information, but then they look at it and they say, well, as complicated as all that is, it doesn't even address 40% of your stuff, and you don't have any answers for that. It's all just, we've reached the point of such corruption and chaos, I think. And I think that's really, everybody's starting to understand that. That's why, as you point out, we've had so many changes in gold where is gold today what's happening let's check yeah let's check in real time uh you can you can always check gold prices by going to uh wolfpack.gold and i have a live ticker let me pull that up let's do wolfpack.gold i just checked it earlier it was uh 27 let me see 27 33 71

and it got up to like 27 60 or something like that uh earlier this week i think yes silver's down just uh under 34 it's 33 dollars uh 70 cents as of this broadcast but yeah these are you know there's a pullbacks there's profit taking the mere fact that we're in the 2700 range yeah is bizarre to me um given the fact that you know we're still we're still inching along and and i don't think a lot of the the damage has caught up to this economy yet i mean we know what went on prior to 2020. David, you and I talked about it and the massive currency creation there in the last quarter of 2019. But really going 2020 and beyond, the basement of the dollar, the damage that's been done. And we are still floating on that. You know, they chose quantitative easing over real austerity and other measures to cut things and dig into what would, you know, balance something out or have any sort of lasting impact.

So I'm still waiting for the reverberations to hit. I don't think they have hit. I don't think that we've seen the true impact yet of the dollar debasement. I think that will start showing up as de-dollarization continues, the loss of the petrodollar, more countries dumping the dollar, getting into gold. As we've seen too, I've mentioned before, the Euro was just supplanted by gold as the second reserve asset held by central banks.

It used to be gold was way down there on the bottom of the list, and now it's supplanted the Euro and what's next is the dollar. I think really gold is the world's reserve currency. And what these other nations like BRICS are working on, David, is they're working on a way that these countries can have cross-border payment systems. Not necessarily a dominating currency together, but just a way that they can trade amongst themselves. And, of course, the gold will be the currency, I think, of the future when it comes to dealing with the nation to nation. I don't think it'll be the dollar.

I agree. And it's not going to get any better. You know, one of the reasons you got Lala and Trump is because regardless of whichever one of them is put in, it's going to continue down the same path with Lala. And Trump is maybe even going to accelerate it by using by weaponizing and threatening people that's only going to accelerate the trend away from the dollar as cross-border payments and things like that but we're seeing from the imf i just talked about the world bank and how it's become this massive organized theft ring uh the imf chief economist

says the battle against inflation is almost one according to newsweek now this is the same newsweek that back in 1979 said we're going to be out of oil and gas by the mid-80s and everything so now newsweek is telling us that the battle against inflation is almost one that's a scary idea isn't it If it's coming from them, it's probably exactly the opposite. Well, we finally beat the common cold, too, David. Well, what we've done is we beat to death the different economies. They're talking about China's economic growth being down maybe only about 5% a year or whatever. But Germany has zero, zero economic growth. I mean, you know, we're looking at these guys have created stagflation

or as uh gerald slinty calls it dragflation and uh you know it is um and yet they're declaring victory you know china went down from 5.2 percent to 4.5 percent great uh but the eurozone is expected to only grow at 0.8 so china is allowed to grow five times faster and and i think that uh the eurozone is actually contracting uh because they're they've lose they're losing all of their ability to manufacture anything because that's right they don't have the china has such an advantage in terms of energy costs there's no way they can ever compete with them that's going to be a bigger factor even than the slave labor and the currency manipulation and the piracy and all these things that have been part of the china price now we've got uh energy that is going to be five to ten times cheaper than everybody

else is using it's crazy well i think it really you hit the nail on the head um it all comes down to production you have a productive economy that of course, in the Asian sector, there's places like China. They make things. They produce things. And that requires energy. And there's labor. And, of course, there's resources. It creates a different type of economy.

It's what the United States was built on. It was manufacturing and production. We were the manufacturing marvel of mankind and also known as the arsenal of democracy. You can look at the history of what we used to supply what we used to produce what we used to export and that all stopped in the early 70s as soon as we went off the the gold standard um started running trade deficits we never ran a trade surplus again um i think that history will show that that was on purpose that things were shifted away uh from this uh hemisphere uh away from the united states away from the west um to again set up what we're looking at right now in this 21st century

which is a a china dominated uh asia dominating uh economic system run uh through places like you know the world economic forum and bank of international settlements the globalist system because they use the chinese model as you point out all the time you have to get away from the united states with its pesky constitution its bill of rights and its uh you know history of western civilization and rule of law property rights all those things you got to get away from that and i think that's what's happening. We're literally being, there's a controlled demolition happening. Not only it happened as first starting in our manufacturing, and then it's going into our currency, which I think will be the final thing that will take the

United States from being a world's dominating superpower. That's the commercial that the World Economic Forum ran, by the way, in 2016. That's how commercial that the World Economic Forum ran, by the way, in 2016. That's how it started. It said, imagine a world where the United States is no longer the world's lone superpower. It's an interesting proposition and question. And if you look at the United States spending seven times more than the other three or four countries combined underneath, that it's arrivals on military budget? How would it lose that status? Well, it would lose the status by losing the world's reserve currency and financial domination that we've had.

And it looks like everything that we're looking at, this is accelerated. Yeah. Well, like you said, how did we win? Well, we won because we were the arsenal of democracy, because we had a vibrant economy. We could outproduce the other side. We could outproduce weapons when it came to that. And so after World War II, we had organizations, first the Bilderberg Group, which met at the site of the last victory of Nazi Germany on the 10th year, and it was on the 10th anniversary of that last victory, put together by people who were instrumental

in making sure that the Allies lost there, and they turned it to economics. They realized that it was the economic foundation that was a path to global domination. Same thing with the World Economic Forum, as you point out, with Klaus Schwab. You know, we're going to transcend with economics. We, on the other hand, after World War II, we decided that we are going to dominate the world by building weapons instead of building our economy.

So, you know, they learned from us and we got the wrong lesson from them. We brought over the operation paperclip i think we brought over not only the uh the people who were involved in uh biometric crime biological crimes and chemical warfare and things like that we also brought over uh their geopolitical ideas and and made that the foundation of our country instead of the way that we were set up before but as we look at this moving out it's it's really we're seeing yet another bank failure this is first national bank of lindsey i don't think it was associated with lindsey graham but who knows you know all wars are bankers war so uh i would imagine that lindsey graham's got to be somewhere

connected to some kind of a bank anyway but this is another one that has gone belly up. And of course, FDIC insured. But just another example of what I think is going to be happening quite a bit. There's no specifics about this. They just said they shut them down because of false and deceptive records. I think we're going to see an avalanche of this stuff after the election. And I guess a word of caution to people would be make sure that you don't um have too much money in the banks and even if you've got gold and silver you might not want to have it in the bank deposit box no i would recommend never having gold and silver in a safety deposit box in a bank because it's uh controlled by the fdic and other federal regulatory agencies. And if you get into any sort of trouble, I just caution against it. There can be liens that you don't know about.

There can be judgments passed against you, and then that box can be seized. That's too much risk. If you're going to do something and go into the private sector, there's a lot better options than oh yeah then using your bank look at that place in la or something where the fbi went in they said well you know there's a couple of places here that i think they were dealing with uh with uh illegal drugs so we're gonna seize everybody's boxes and a lot of people had legitimately had gold and silver and things like that just took everything from everybody no it's it's terrifying i mean to think about

you really get you got to do some research we use i, for the IRAs, we use some very reputable storage places like IDS and other things that are with deal engage at the trading floor in Dallas and then all over the country. But there's a, you know, Miles Franklin, Andy Sheckman, those are people to talk to about storage. I don't do, I don't do that. I don't offer that i think that's a whole other realm that uh i'm actually just too busy for so i'm not i don't think i could take on any more projects right now no but you're absolutely right on the bank failures and being exposed that way and it will be after the election i think um regardless of who wins um a lot of things that were put on pause uh as to not affect outcome or to see what was going to happen like this a lot of the things that were kept on in stasis i think will be brought out post-election so that's when

you really got to pay attention uh here and especially going into to first quarter 2025 so much is on the table they were halfway through this, and you and I both know that the goal here, Agenda 2030, this is the milestone. And 2020 opened up with a bang, you know, with the assassination of Soleimani by Trump. The hashtag was World War III. I remember because I was hosting your show, and I thought, wow, we're just going to open this decade right up here with no holds barred. This is right out of the gate. And, of course, right after that, we had COVID-1984 and the lockdowns and all of that that came afterwards. So we've been on a steady pace for Agenda 2030.

Make no mistake about it. So it will ramp back up after the election. It will. And regardless of who wins, people, I don't understand how the MAGA people excuse Trump going to Davos January 20th of 2020. And then within a couple of months, he locks the entire country down. And within 10 days, his HHS secretary declares a global health emergency when nobody has died. Right. So, I mean, you know, anybody else,

they would have said, look at that. He's, you know, he's doing what Davos wants him to do. Uh, but for him, he gets a pass.

It's amazing. This was the article that I was talking about in terms of the acceleration. The U S national debt adds $500 billion in accrued interest in just three weeks, uh, as net interest costs are $882 billion. So, I mean, you look at this, and it's just a straight up, it went vertical in terms of what it added.

So, it's truly amazing, and the ability to even be able to service this debt, and of course, anything that you got in a bank account, Janet Yellen, artificial intelligence, and 80,000 IRS agents are going to be sniffing around to confiscate everything. It's just amazing to me to see what's going to be happening in the next couple of years.

I think everything's accelerated. They're going to use their fiscal shortfalls as an excuse to go after people. And they won't go after the uber-rich. They're going to use uh their fiscal shortfalls as an excuse to go after people and they won't go after the uber rich they're going to go after the middle class and it's this is a calling uh to make sure that uh there's going to be two classes in the country that have and have nots that's works works best in the communist system that's that's their playbook it'll be a you know i think something that bill cooper talked about is a one world totalitarian socialist government it's what they want um it's it's plain to see that's um that's their politics and um that's their goals and they've told you what their goals are so yeah it'll start the things that they'll go

after decentral is they'll go after whatever's decentralized they'll go after the smaller things and um i don't think they're necessarily going to be successful either, David. I think there's a lot of people that are onto this, that are moving away from centralized systems. They're skeptical of the financial system. That's wonderful. I think crypto's done a great job educating people on that. Crypto, in my opinion, is really being tested right now. You know, Bitcoin's being tested.

Is it an asset that you want to keep in times of uncertainty? That's an open question. I like Bitcoin. I buy some every day. But as we move closer into the 2030 agenda, more and more I look at precious metals and say, well, I'm glad I've got, you know, I've got, this is a gold coin. This is from 1848. This is still money. This is a British sovereign from 1848 that I'm holding in my hand. I've got, you know, I've got, uh, this is a gold coin. This is from 1848. This is still money.

This is a British sovereign from 1848 that I'm holding in my hand. I've had on my desk. Um, it's worth about $600 or maybe more right now. Um, and then that's, you know, get been money for, you know, uh, a very long time. And, uh, so it will continue to be money, um, for the rest of history, as long as there's human beings. So I think there's something that is very, you know, as far as smart to be outside of the system when it comes to the digitized world and the things they're bringing in and the economic uncertainty having something outside of counterparty risk. And so I'm precious metals first and crypto

second. Yeah. Yeah. And they have no answer for how they're going to get to fiscal sovereignty, right? Or sanity. You know, as Janet Yellen's only answer is, oh, we're going to squeeze people harder with the IRS. When you look at this, they add $500 billion

in just three weeks. So that's a half a trillion dollars that means that they're now going at the pace if they keep this up that that pace is two and a half trillion for every hundred days uh they're accelerating this insanity they're going you know it's bad enough that we're doing a trillion dollars every hundred days now this is at the pace of going two and a half trillion every 100 days and the only answer is to ramp up the irs yeah this is kind of like i was talking about the national sale about property tax and um you know the response of doug bergham up in north dakota well you know we're just going to take it somewhere else there's no idea that they

could ever reduce anything that the government's doing or that they could even do it more efficiently no we'll just have to grab more taxes from somewhere else. These people are never going to fundamentally change. That's why we need to start looking at getting out of this system, parallel measures, and I think, you know, certainly the best things you can do financially parallel is to get into gold and silver. And it's a hedge not just with all the crazy geopolitics

and the crazy, you know, resetting of the financial system globally, but also because their intention is to surveil and to control everything that we do through CBDC. So that still comes. That has not changed, in my opinion. I think that is the key reason to start accumulating gold and silver is because of CBDCs. And even Russia's talking about doing that. China took the forefront of that. russia's talking about doing that you know china took the forefront of that uh everybody is going to be doing that so that's where you need to get outside of that

system i think yeah just because bricks is opposing the united states western system of uh economic dominance doesn't mean they're good yeah it doesn't you know it doesn't it doesn't mean or hitler right just because the enemy my enemy is not necessarily my friend. They might be a co-belligerent for a short period of time, but they're not our friend. And for the record, I don't oppose the dollar system if it's done right. I think it could be a stable payment. after Breton Woods was fundamentally sound until we started debasing our currency in the 1960s and taking the silver out and running the Vietnam War, the guns and butter and all that stuff. I think that's what really made it unsound, of course, going off the gold standard. But

I think Americans are better off now that they can own gold. 1974, Gerald Ford made it legal for you to own gold uh with his executive order which has been great um so be your own bank and necessarily these governments are going to continue to do what they do which is they're going to take a currency they're going to you know use it to they're going to inflate their way out of of any issue that they have whether it's the welfare warfare state that's going to debase the purchasing power that's just what they do it's going to be unlimited so you want to have something that is outside of that system and that is as finite and that's right that's either you know something like gold silver

or bitcoin tell us a little bit about what's going on at wise wolf now uh how is the um the wolf pick going on and there's a lot of volatility with that how How is that? There's so much, but we had to take it down. There was so much volatility. The price is just whipsawing and then the price is going up and we're trying to, so it's just temporarily down because what had happened is we're trying to do it with no fees, with no credit card fees. So you have to do the payment through our checking system and just lining that up with people's picks on that it was just harder so i'm gonna have to find a way to do it in real time so we're working on that that's just something we learned from the first round of it that we couldn't do it in the way that with these prices they're not stable they're continuing to they could go down for some profit taking and then you just see a lurch forward

uh and that is making it very difficult like just to stay ahead of that and i've been doing this for uh the wolf pack uh memberships itself like just finding finding the product now is getting harder and finding the smaller product is getting harder the fractionalized stuff we will do it i think this is a this is an excellent challenge for me i enjoy the challenge but uh we've made all the wolf pack members our priority so anything going on in wise wolf that all goes into wolf pack first so um it's been an interesting time staying ahead of these prices and this is the new normal by the way um well you always said you always said it was gonna it was gonna take off like this and the problem was going to be finding product while we're there now

well the most bullish people were saying 2700 maybe700, maybe January, February 2025 or something like that. And it's already kicking off. I think we're going to be in for a wild ride, and it's going to be very difficult to get. That's going to be a challenge to get that stuff through there, I think. Yeah, I think definitely 2025, $3,000 gold easy. And I think that's just based off of the strength, the dollar strength waning more than anything. And central bank gold buying continues to outpace. It's not slowing down.

And that's only like a 10% increase from where it is right now. I don't see a problem. That's a good thing, 10%. But in terms of what we have seen over the last year so and nothing has fundamentally changed in spite of what newsweek says or the imf chief economist it's really changed it's only getting worse uh so you got a program gerald ford's campaign you know is going to whip inflation whip inflation now that you should sell those buttons that's probably that that metal right there is probably worth something in terms of satire you know uh you can't whip inflation with fake currency that's right can't

do it gotta have sites you've got to have stable sound money to whip inflation and they're not going to be able to do it with fiat that's right that's right well tell us uh you got uh your program is going to be immediately following this one today that's correct oh yes sir orderburn radio transmission you can find us over on rockfin on the America Unplugged channel. We've got the Rumble channel as well, America Unplugged. That's where I broadcast with Billy Ray Valentine and the legendary Don Jeffries every Saturday. And my Twitter, or ex, at Tony Arterburn.

I'll be live there. So go check us out. We'll have an hour of, we'll see what I can come up with to talk about. I'm sure it'll be interesting. Good news. Oh, I'm sure it will be. be it's always interesting you always do a great job and thank you so much for joining us thank you for supporting the program thank you very much tony appreciate it oh absolutely thank you david thank you all you do thank you david knight dot cole and i'll take you to tony's wise wolf thank you tony we're gonna be right back, folks. Stay with us. The common man.

They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

thedavidknightshow.com well we have uh fx zero rec did you guys also have a fluoride lady at school? No, we didn't have one. Here in Swarabia, we have had a designated lady that swings by elementary school every week to force children to take fluoride tabs. Wow. Wow. We walked out of the pediatrician's office when he tried to push that on our, push that on our kids. Uh, that's amazing. No, we didn't have that kind of stuff. Uh, we had, uh, didn't even, I was, we didn't have a dare when I was in school, that abomination came after that. Uh, that's amazing. That's amazing. I guess mate did the fluoride lady did she have fluorosis on her teeth

was like all eaten up and everything taking those fluoride tabs uh lt oracle of truth david publics also offers 20 for flu and covid vax i also found out through a manager that the pharmacy is their most profitable department yeah Yeah, I bet. I bet. Well, you know, when I was talking about Walgreens and CVS, I said it's like three quarters of a trillion dollar business, except they're being squeezed by the insurance companies on that kind of stuff. And, you know, if you can get people to come in

to get their prescriptions, then, you know, they can sell them groceries. And that's really where the brick and mortar Walgreens and CVS are falling short. They're just don't really, they're not stocking the store. You know, why do you call it a store? Well, because you got to put stuff there, you know, you store things there so people can buy it. They don't do too good a job with that.

I do want to briefly say thank you to some of the people who have sent contributions by mail. I want to acknowledge this because it's hard for them to know if it got through. Gonzalo and Susan M., David and Anne-Marie N., David and Joan F., Stephanie K., Jeremy W., Joyce H., Philip and Kelly M., Paul G. from Oregon, Mark C., Jackie and Fred U., William G. Thank you so much for your support. And Jackie and Fred also wrote this. They said, good news. I finished paying a loan off.

I can now double the amount of your monthly check. Thank you so much for doing that. I really do appreciate it. And they've been faithful supporters for a long time. I hope this helps. Fred and I are continuing to pray for Whistler and for all of you through these trying times. Thank you so much, especially for that.

It is, and for those of you who don't know, he's been injured by a fluoride-based antibiotic. Stay away from those things. I mean, they keep changing the names and tweaking the formulation so they can keep in it, antibiotic stay away from those things i mean they keep changing the names and um you know tweaking the formulation so they can keep in it but we've known for 45 years cipro and these other things the horrific injuries that they do to people permanent injuries in many cases so we're praying it's not going to be permanent and um he is able to get up he's not in constant pain now

so there's been an improvement so thank you for your prayers with that there's been improvement that he's able to get up but he can't do much of anything and if he tries to um even walk down the stairs um he did that the other day and he got tremendous um long lasting pain in his wrist and his knee so you take it very easy with him the um you know the tendonitis is one of the things that this poison does to people. And it is poison. Absolutely, it's poison. Let's talk a little bit about fear. Because I mentioned this yesterday.

I said, why do you have these Christian pastors out there who are putting in a spirit of fear into people about this election? So we don't need to fear this. We ought to look at it objectively and everything. But we need to set this well look at it objectively and everything but we need to set the standard of morality high we need to set the standard of christ high and we don't need to yoke ourselves to these corrupt individuals and they'll apologetically say well you know nobody's perfect well most people don't brag about there's that's one of the things i said about trump from

the beginning i said you know uh for the longest time i had said you know what is it about the lgbt people well they have their pride parades i said they're proud of their sin i said people don't typically parade their sin and they're not typically proud of it but these people are and uh and i even use the analogy i said do you have adulterer parades you know that might wind you up in divorce court uh but you know when trump came on the scene politically i said well i guess i have to change that analogy because he is somebody who is proud of his adultery right he parades his immorality like the LGBT people do. And that's a big problem. Why would you ally yourself to that?

And, you know, you have the Christian churches who will criticize, the conservatives who will criticize the liberal Christians who attach themselves to LGBT and elevate and worship LGBT, and yet they do it with Trump. And the two of them are both proud of their sin. So, but it really comes down to fear.

And I saw this on a world that says, uh, are conservative Christians driven by fear? You know, you got a lot of the so-called leaders tell you to vote out of fear. And a lot of these leaders were also telling you four years ago, like Al Mohler was telling you to take the vaccine out of fear. And do it because you love your neighbor and so forth.

All these different things. But the question is, should Christians be looking to Christ as their leader? Because if you're looking to Christ as your leader, you don't have fear, right? Why would you fear? If you really see yourself in his hand, what would you fear? If Christians ever, and I say Christians at large, right? If the church at large begins to see itself in the hand of Christ, if they see Christ as their leader and their protector,

that's going to make a big difference. But if they don't, they have to keep quiet. They have to not rock the boat. And they're ashamed of their faith, and they live in fear. And it's being sold to them by these people who have thousands of people show up every week to their building, or they run seminaries like Al Mohler, and they've got to toe that line.

Or they want to have connections to politicians. They want to be seen standing next to Trump or praying for Trump or whatever. You know, you stop and think about it. Christ said, those who are not sick don't need a physician. If you think you've got everything handled and you don't need any forgiveness, you're not going to get forgiveness. And, you know, you see that with Trump, don't you? I've played for you the clips where Frank Luntz and Jake Tapper, of all people, talk to him. Don't you think you need forgiveness?

You say that, you know, you kind of nod your head to the Christians and so forth. No, I don't really think I need any forgiveness. I really don't think I need any forgiveness. That is the most dangerous position. Where are all these people who are praying for him? Do they really love him? If they won't tell him that he does need forgiveness and where he can find forgiveness,

you got all these pastors like Paula White and this Hispanic guy, Maldonado or something, was it? The guy who has six homes, a private jet, $120 million in terms of his net assets and all the rest of it. Does he talk to Trump and say, you know, you stand condemned before God, and the only way that you're going to stop that condemnation is through Christ, they've never given him the gospel. These people stand next to him. They make a big show out

of praying for him. They hate him. How could you do that over and over again? I'm his spiritual advisor, says Paula White. How could you do that over and over again? You don't tell him the gospel? What they're doing is they're feeding his greed because these people are greedy. Paul White and these other prosperity gospel preachers are just all about the money, and so is Trump. And they just, you know, they just grift off of each other. They have nothing to do with the gospel. They have no hope to give him. And they are trying to put that spirit of fear in you.

And it's not just the prosperity gospel people either. There's a lot of these Baptist conservative preachers out there who are doing it. I said the Archbishop of Vigano, who is a conservative and does politics, he's doing that as well. And so this guy says, you know, talking about fear, he said at times, it seems like the media is obsessed with the fears that conservative Christians supposedly possess. And with that, he's talking about how they always call us transphobic or homophobic or this. It's always a phobia there, right? So he says, well, you know, they have a Christianophobia, Christanophobia maybe.

I think we just need to stop with all the fraudulent psychology, all the Sigmund Freud. Freud is a fraud. Let's stop with all the phobia stuff. Let's just understand we've got nothing to fear but God. And if you fear God, he is a merciful God as well.

But it has been argued that these fears have turned Christians into monsters, made them afraid of women, motivated their voting, and led them to become intolerant. Scholars have argued that conservative Christianity has created a

culture of fear. And they've called conservative Christianity the religion of fear. Well, I got to say, you know, when you look at these people who are telling you you got to vote for Trump, what are they doing? They're telling you that out of fear. They're trying to gen that fear with people. They even accused Christians of fearing that they are declining and thus need to increase their fertility. He says, as I studied Christanophobia and academic bias, he said, I realized that the academics have a powerful motivation to focus on negative characteristics with Christians,

particularly white evangelicals. It's not simply that certain academics seek to portray Christians in a negative light, but it's also the fact that they are hesitant to see the same negative traits among other groups, particularly groups that they're a member of. You can always see the moat in the other person's eye, the log in the other person's eye, the splinter, and you don't see the big one in yours. But these people are full of fear, aren't they, on the left? They have the atmos fear of global warming and CO2. They have Trump fear. You know, just like a lot of these conservative Christians are pushing the fear of Lala.

Well, these people push the fear of Trump. When it became apparent that Biden was highly unlikely to win re-election, it was not merely the tone of disappointment, but it was a sound of desperation. And it was also the sound of fear. And I say that, you know, he says, ah, look at this, and I see that they have a lot of fear. And they can't see their fear.

Can we see our fear? You know, they were afraid with Biden there. It's collapsing. He's not going to win everything is lost are we seeing the same type of thing on our side right this is what was the basis of the grift of stop the steal and trump's save america was the. Got a lot of people into a lot of trouble unnecessarily. I said there's no reason to go there. I said it's going to be a trap. They trap us with fear. They destroy us.

They use depopulation shots on us because of fear. We should not have fear like these other people. But I see that same type of fear that he sees in the left about Biden. I see that same type of fear on the right being sold by people who should be Christian leaders. Do we believe that those who lament about the end of democracy? See, both sides are saying this. And if we're not careful, if we don't push back against this fear, this fear is going

to be used to create a civil war one way or the other. That's why they're doing it. The fear that their political or religious group is going to be left out. Well, I just have to say that as Christians, we're not given a spirit of fear. So if you've got a Christian leader who is selling you fear, then they're not selling you Christ. They're selling you something else. They have a spirit that is opposed to Christ.

That spirit of fear is coming from Satan. It's not coming from Christ. And these politicians, wannabe politicians who are standing up in front of these churches and telling people, you've got to vote for Trump. You got to vote versus sin.

They're selling you a spirit of fear. They're not giving you a message from Christ. They're giving you a message from Satan. What is it? The political progressives fear. And how might that fear be manifested in their actions in our society? He said, my recent work points to a distinct source of fear for political progressives, and that is conservative Christians.

They fear Christians. They don't fear God. They fear Christians. Well, he says, Christians can say that they have a right to fear the larger culture as well. Ultimately, I cannot determine if the fear within progressives is higher or more consequential than the fear within Christians. As I said yesterday, repeated over and over again in the Bible,

fear not, fear not, fear not. Why? Because God rules. God rules even when we have totalitarians in place in our society. God still rules. And even when the wicked succeed, God rules. I ask the question in Psalms so many times. Why do the wicked prosper?

Why do they succeed? Well, we take solace in the fact that God is in control and that he sees what is happening. So let them fear. We don't have that spirit. If we have that spirit, you better cast it out. And you better stop paying attention to these people who are pushing that fear. But at the same time, there are things that we need to do. Why not focus more on what we can do something about?

You may not be able to keep the politician that you fear out of office, but I tell you what you can do. You can keep Disney out of your house. You can keep some of these things away from your kids. This is an excellent article from The Center. It's time for Christian parents to completely abandon Disney for good. You see, there are things that you can actually do that really will make a difference, a bigger difference in your life.

And this is an excellent article talking about Disney. He says, the war on children is real, disney is on the front lines waging war against them and let's be honest everybody knows that disney's own sexual revolution isn't just a weird little rebranding in order to stay relevant in the modern cultural zeitgeist in other words they're not they're not following uh what is there in the culture they're setting the culture disney has become a full-fledged weapon of the left carefully constructed to shove queer theory and homosexual propaganda right into the minds of children disney has completely abandoned the concept of entertainment it's now a school of indoctrination. Gone are the days of wholesome, family-friendly stories

with clear moral foundations. Today's Disney is sending up a relentless barrage of sexual confusion designed to make children not only acceptable, but to celebrate the radical redefinition of gender and of sexuality. And what's even worse, Christian parents, of all people, are blind to see it. Disney's strategy isn't just about adding a token queer character here or there. No, they've positioned themselves as cultural warriors, openly determined to normalize this perverse homosexual agenda.

Just look at their loud and proud endorsement of pride nonsense and their open hostility towards laws that defended parental rights like those in Florida. Because if you don't want parents to know what you're doing with the kids, you are by definition a groomer. By definition, you are a pedophile when you're talking to them about sex and you don't want parents to know you know what you're doing is wrong that's why you don't want the parents to find out they have abandoned disney has abandoned the family-friendly persona that built the company

into what it is and it's become a megaphone for the sexual revolution a transformation that ought to make any christian parents sit up and take notice. Disney isn't just betraying the values that they once pretended to stand for. They're actively working to dominate the world with its own sexual ethics. You know, just stop and think about it. And this is, we see the same thing happening really with the public schools as well. People want to see the public schools or they want to see disney as what it was that they experienced and you know the public school that i experienced we had kids bringing guns to school for target practice and things like that we didn't have mass shootings and we didn't have metal detectors and

we didn't have police officers there and all the rest of this stuff uh we didn't have all this gender grooming the sexual grooming of kids none of that was there but it's there today and you better realistically look at it if you're a parent you the kid if you're old enough to be a parent you would not uh you can't imagine what the schools have become That's why we saw the big explosion homeschooling after parents were able to see what was going on in their kids' classroom. Always they would dismiss it in the past. Well, it's not happening in my kids' class. Oh, yes, it is.

And when you look at Disney, I remember growing up how Disney used to do great things about history, you know, Johnny Tremaine, other things like that. Davy Crockett, you know, he loved Americana and they were wholesome stories that had heroes in them and taught about American history and all that kind of, very different than what you saw in Hollywood, the rest of Hollywood.

The rest of Hollywood had been taken over by these perverts who, just listen to what shirley temple said about uh mgm when i left fox i went to mgm for one picture thank goodness only one and when i got there with my mother we were separated she went into the office of louis b mayor and i went into the office of arthur freed and he was going to talk to me about a movie he wanted to put me in. I'm 12 years old, you know. And I thought he was a producer, but instead he was an exhibitor. And I'd never seen anyone naked before, except myself.

So I had no clue about what was happening. And so it struck me so funny, I laughed at him. And I laughed uproariously I had tears you know and he got infuriated and he said out out out go did you tell your mother? well I went down I was very quiet I went down and met her in the lobby of the administration building she came up very quietly from Louis B. Mayer's office and we walked hand in hand silently to the car which was unusual we got in the car driving home I said mom

you won't believe what happened to me and And I told her what happened, and she got kind of quiet. And she said, well, you don't know what happened to me. And Louis B. Mayer wasn't as bad as Freed was to me. Have you tried it? He came on to my mother. And so we both decided that we didn't like MGM much. It was better at Fox. much it was better at fox and it was better at disney right you know there was a time like i said you know walt disney would do magic and stuff like that you know fairy tales and things like that and a lot of people criticize him for that but uh i think he was using it as a plot device but then it became you know now it's become a big deal you know now it's all about oh what's

doing can't i mean it's literally into the witchcraft stuff openly. You could argue whether or not that was their intention before, but there's no question that's their intention now. That was Shirley Temple, of course, talking about what Hollywood was like. It was always that way. You know, the big Hollywood studios. That's why Disney was very different. And, you know, it actually, I think think got better from a moral standpoint uh when walt died and his brother roy took over they went through a period of i guess you could say

artistic decline uh but it was actually more wholesome you know there's a period of time we had kurt russell doing these movies like the computer wore tennis shoes and stuff it's kind of silly stuff uh but you know you also had Roy did his version of Robin Hood. And it was all about it's kind of like an anti-government tax rally. That's where these guys were coming from. You know, Hollywood was not American. Hollywood was always anti-American. It was filled with a bunch of immigrants who were communists.

And they really did not like american culture and they made it pretty clear that they wanted to move against it frankfurt school and others like that but disney was different in that respect but now it's not he says here we are with christian parents still flocking to disney world still signing up for disney plus and filling their homes with Disney-branded garbage. This isn't just naive, it's complicity. By dragging their kids into this sewerage, which is now you can, there is no question that that's what Disney is today.

Like I said, with Walt, you can look at some of the magic stuff and say, well, I don't think we want to do that. No question that's where it is today. These parents are willingly offering them up to a culture that is drowning in the excrement of sexual depravity and and by the way you know when you look at it was roy's daughter i think is abigail disney i think she's roy's daughter uh he sends her to the best schools, and she comes out as a Marxist, right? You see this over and over again. You know, the two of them really reflected Main Street, USA at the turn of the century. That's Main Street, USA, where you enter Disney World. That's not what she grew up in. This is a culture that not only rejects God's design for human sexuality, but actively spits in his face.

This isn't just bad parenting. It is negligence at best, treason at worst. Disney's commitment to this radical agenda runs deep. It's not about a single film or a character. This is systematic, deliberate campaign to groom children into embracing sexual chaos. Disney is molding an entire generation's view of sexuality, one subtly placed scene at a time. And trust me, they know exactly what they're doing. It's all about desensitization through mind-melding them with constant exposure.

They know exactly what they're doing, just like the MGM guys knew what they were doing with Shirley Temple. You see, if you look at movies like Lightyear or Elemental or Inside Out 2, they're nothing more than Trojan horses for the LGBT agenda. A casual same-sex kiss here, a non-binary character there, it's all part of the plan. Yet Christian parents shrug it off, pretending these moments are just part of the story of an otherwise good movie. But let's be honest, either they're blind to the manipulation or worse, they just don't care. Many Christian parents still just don't get it or don't care. They've let nostalgia for the Disney of their youth cloud their judgment, in the same way

that people let nostalgia for the school that they attended as a child cloud their judgment of what the schools have turned into. How could the same company that gave us The Lion King and Beauty and the Beast possibly be leading their children into spiritual danger? Well, that is the clever trap. It's crystal clear. Parents are commanded to train up their child in the way he should go. And that doesn't mean handing them over to Disney to be disciplined into the sexual revolution or to take them and drop them off at a government grooming center that we call public school. Letting your children be shaped by Disney's twisted worldview or the schools is an abdication of your God-given role as a parent.

This isn't about being overly strict or paranoid either. It's not about fear of them either. You either understand what's going on, you accept what's happening, or you just are blindly walking through this in a fog. It's about recognizing the very real battle for the hearts and minds of children that Disney has picked aside. It's just not God's side. Like I said about that rich pastor, mega church, MAGA pastor. He said, this is a battle between good and evil. And I said, he doesn't even know what battlefield he's on.

He's on the wrong battlefield and he doesn't know where the war is. This is where the war is. It's not in the presidential election. The Disney of today is not the magical wonderland from your childhood memories. It is a battleground run by militant queers whose mission is to win over your children to their side. It's ideological warfare with fairy tales and catchy tunes as the Trojan horse. Disney isn't just selling entertainment. They're selling a perverse worldview that is sugar-coated for easy consumption yet it rots the soul like decaying teeth yeah a spoonful of sugar helps debauchery go down right uh so on the other hand on the other hand right another movie that

just dropped a good movie let's talk about what is positive uh there's another movie that just dropped, a good movie. Let's talk about what is positive. There's a movie that just dropped. It's called Average Joe. It hit theaters October 11th. This is the first I saw of it. We don't keep up with what's going on in the movies anymore. Haven't been for years, really. This is about an ex-atheist prayer, uh, fight that led to a harrowing battle and a monumental win for religious liberty.

And of course, this is Joe Kennedy. The average Joe is Joe Kennedy, the high school football coach that was fired for praying silently on the 50 yard line. And he took that fight all the way to the Supreme Court and won. He took a stand for God publicly. He took a knee in prayer. And he refused to bow to their tyranny. And it was tyranny. It was in defiance of the Constitution.

And the Supreme Court agreed with that. But it is what it is. Whether he won in the Supreme Court or not, he was still right. And that's what we have to understand. Whether or not we win in the Supreme Court, we're still in the right if we bow our knee to God. You don't have to bow your knee to the Supreme Court. The movie follows the release of his book last year. The book was called Average Joe, One Man's Faith and the Fight to Change a Nation.

Both projects touch on his seven years in a legal battle with a school district in Washington State, which ultimately led to the six to three Supreme Court ruling and Kennedy versus Bramerton School District in June of 2022. I'm surprised it's that long ago. Yeah, that's more than two years ago. I thought it happened more recently a decision that upheld his right to pray after games and found that the government should not punish private religious acts like prayer he said i wanted everybody to see from the beginning where i came from he said uh the home that he was born in he said he was born

as an unwanted pregnancy and he grew up in foster homes he said he was born as an unwanted pregnancy. And he grew up in foster homes. He said all of that. The back story to see what led me to be the guy to stand up for what was right and what has happened since then. His life hasn't been easy as he was in the foster care system and he struggled with anger during his earlier years for being abandoned by his parents. Before prayer became his anchor he was an atheist and he had no interest in anything eternal he said it was really my wife i was failing as a husband he said everywhere i went i seemed to just wreck people's lives amid all this turmoil his wife den, who was a Christian, started to rub off

on him, he said. With his life disintegrating in front of him, he had to make a decision to continue on the same destructive path or to embrace faith. I said, I finally looked at this with her. He says, as things were rapidly falling apart, I had no other place to turn. I fell onto the altar, and I kind of made a deal with God. I said, God, if you give me my wife, I'll give you my life. That commitment struck and transformed his marriage, and beyond that, it led him to tackle the years-long legal battle that eventually expanded religious rights for all Americans. I didn't know that God was really going to use my life like he did, he said.

And he said the path that led to the Supreme Court battle was an intriguing one with the central components taking form after he found himself entering high school athletics. Reflecting back on the coaching job, he said it really was a God thing. I didn't know anything about football, he said. I had just gotten out of the Marine Corps. I didn't want to do anything. I thought I was retired. I was out on a run one day and the athletic director pulls up alongside and started a conversation with me. He found out I was a Marine and he said, have you ever thought about coaching? At first, Kennedy said he wasn't interested,

but the athletic director kept pursuing him, something he now believes was likely divine intervention. He said, eventually I watched the movie Facing the Giants and those Kendrick guys, he said, they put a hurting on my heart and God just spoke to me and said, hey, this is your calling. And that's where it all came from. I accepted the job of being a coach and it took it right out of the movie to give God the glory after every game. His decision to play on the

50-yard line after games became the impetus for his legal battle. He said, when they told me I couldn't do it, I couldn't understand that. Something so simple as a prayer and I didn't want to create waves with the school. Initially, he was told to stop praying with the players, so he complied. And he never prayed with his team again. But he didn't stop his private prayer on the 50-yard line after the games. And that became a problem for the school. You know, just like these people who silently pray outside abortion clinics. Oh, you can't do that.

He said, they told me I could no longer do that because people could still see me in public praying. Well, that's where the rub came in. They finally gave me a letter of direction that said I needed to choose between my faith and my job, and I was going to be put on suspension until I complied with the school district's policies. That was a no-win situation.

No American should have to choose between their faith and their job. After losing his job, he fought back and he eventually won. He ushered in the situation that he believes is truly beneficial for all. He said the great thing about the Supreme Court is that they opened it up. And we have more religious liberty now than we've had in the past 50 years. Because 50 years ago, we had people who came in, like the current organization Freedom From Religion. That's not what the Constitution says. It's a free exercise of religion.

And you're free to do that regardless of whether you work for the government, regardless of where you are. You could be at a school. You could be in front of an abortion clinic. You don't ever lose those God-given rights to worship God. Michelle Obama, thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that. It says, peace be with you and your family. Thank you.

AAP Rumble Seat, Disney has allegedly become openly weaponized against kids. Don't pay or buy into having your children mind-controlled and groomed. Yes. Take control. That's right. Take control. Don't be passive. Don't think you're doing something by being so laser-focused on the election.

All that will do is make you fearful. And Sue Friedman, thank you for the tip. It was a good day, David and family. I'm a long-time listener. I pray for you and your family daily. Thank you so much. If Travis and his wife are preferring not to have their baby be issued a birth certificate

and social security number while at the hospital, all they have to do is tell the hospital that they've not decided on a name. Oh, that's good. I'll pass that. Thank you, Sue. I appreciate that. If you don't provide a name, they can't issue a birth certificate or social security card.

That's good. The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it. Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther. People have to trust me. I mean, trust the science. Wear your mask. Take your vaccine. Don't ask questions. Using free speech to free minds it's the david knight show