The David Knight Show - Thr 26Sep24 David Knight UNABRIDGED - Alex Jones, Sandy Hook, J6, Lockdowns, Free Speech: What REALLY Happened & Where I Think It'll Go Next

Episode Date: September 26, 2024

Infowars, FreeSpeech, Sandy Hook comments begin about 41 minutes in(2:00) Media Speculates on Romance between Musk & Italian PM Meloni — but are they both in bed with NATO's propaganda arm the Atlantic Council that pushes war, censorship, and globalism? (13:25) Free Speech, Billionaires, and Controlled OppositionReport: Twitter (X) censors more for government than before Musk took it overZuckerberg moves to the right and now identifies as libertarian or "classical liberal".  Is this a sign that Trump will be selected and installed again?Wikipedia pays groups to embed feminism, racism, etc — but it's NOTHING compared to the efforts to embed propaganda and lies into AI Chat programs(41:23) The Right to Speak Evil and What REALLY Happened with Alex Jones, Sandy Hook, J6, Lockdowns and Free Speech What happened and what I think will happen.  Will Infowars be sold and become like the Drudge Report, the polar opposite of its current political orientation? (1:36:10) INTERVIEW Gold Rises as Reset Escalates Tony Arterburn, DavidKnight.gold Gradually is turning into suddenly The Great Reset is picking up speed as we head into the tail end of this Fourth Turning, a major restructuring of financial and political systems. (2:05:32) Listener comments and Jason Barker's grandson prayer request, Handy's emergency patient, 2 years after 4 jabs, Psalm 37 - fret (2:26:42) Lala's Had a Couple of Bad DaysBiden stabs her in the back — and TWISTS the knife.  Was this coming from Jill?Lala's Disastrous Solo Interview.  She thought it was going be safe, that she'd be given a pass on specifics.  Then THIS happened….Lala is VERY specific about one issue, ABORTION.  And the specifics of how she will remove abortion restrictions with national legislation has cost her the support of TWO Democrat Senators, Manchin & Sinema$100 MILLION from the abortion industry to Lala(2:49:56) Nuke Mania: #1 Priority of Govt is to Power AI — What Does THAT Tell You? From Pennsylvania's Governor and Three Mile Island to Energy Sec Granholm — the #1 priority is getting power to AI while they work on SHUTTING DOWN OUR POWER.  AI is critical for their POLITICAL power.Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy. I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough.

You can find Happy Enough wherever you listen to podcasts. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 26th of September, Year of Our Lord 2024. Well, today we're going to take a look at a perhaps budding romance between Elon Musk and Prime Minister Maloney of Italy, and that's what the press is all about. You know, they had kind words to say to each other. They're smiling, sitting next to each other. Who cares? I really don't care. The point is, where were they?

They were at the Atlantic Council. The Atlantic Council. They've got both of them who are supposed to be conservative, populist. This is their public image. But privately, they're having an affair with the Atlantic Council, the epicenter of war and censorship. We're going to begin with that today we have a lot to cover in the news it's amazing uh what comes out of a single interview with lala harris she thought she was safe this reporter actually pursued the truth. It's pretty amazing the clips we've got. We'll be right back. By the way, I want to begin with a serious note before we get into politics, which is decidedly unserious. But like I said before, I view politics as a gathering storm that is headed your way. It's like these hurricanes. What are you going to do?

Are you going to move? Are you going to board up and get out of harm's way? Are you going to prepare for it, weather it out? What are you going to do? But you need to know where the storm is coming. So I'm just kind of a political weatherman not a weather vane i don't i don't turn with the wind but i tell you what i'm seeing coming uh but uh on a serious side though um i got a uh email last night from jason barker and uh jason who does nights of the storm and and you know Jason I mean he's been around for from the beginning of this show he wrote a great letter that so many people used

he was in the military he was fighting against the vaccine mandates and he showed his letter that he was using and it had four or five key points. He said, look, don't just copy this, but if you believe any of these things, these are what I believe, and these are the points that I have used, and that type of thing. It was a great deal of benefit to many, many people. I had people who were in the medical community who talked about how they had used that to fight the vaccine mandates and things like that a strong christian believer and his um he's got a grandson that was born yesterday liam and everything went well at the beginning but then they started having problems with his grandson breathing and they sent them to the emergency room, or not the emergency, another hospital, I think.

But nevertheless, he is in a very severe condition, and so he asked for your prayers. And we'll give you a reminder of that later in the program, but please pray for little Liam, Jason Barker's grandson at this moment. So let's talk about politics here. These people can't give us what we want, can they? So the Italian Prime Minister goes to the Atlantic Council

and all the press can talk about is whether or not there's some kind of a romantic relationship that is budding between Maloney and Musk. Folks, what it does is it underscores how phony the two of them are. Maloney ran as Italian Prime Minister. She ran over the border issue, like Trump did. And then, of course, she immediately ignored all of it.

Immediately turned on all of it and turned toward the EU. Turned away from her populist policies and so forth and turned toward the EU. Good example. One of the worst examples of this massive migration was a little Italian island where they had 6,000 people, and within a few days they brought in 12,000 people

who had no way to support themselves into this island. Where are they all going to live? The crime and all the rest of this stuff, it's just the volume of this just flooded that little island well she's prime minister she presided over that and i guess they liked that enough that they invited her to the atlantic council and gave her an award italian prime minister georgia maloney delivered a powerful speech after receiving the at Council's Global Citizen Award in New York.

She focused on the importance of Western values, democracy, and the fight against authoritarianism. What hypocrisy from these people. Again, you want to talk about the Atlantic Council. The Atlantic Council, folks,

is first and foremost, a big NATO organization. They're for war everywhere. And they're for censorship everywhere. They actually created something called the Digital Forensics Lab. And, I mean, they've been pushing this censorship since 2018.

They were at the epicenter of this massive purge, first of Infowars in 2018, August. And then two months later, you had 800 sites were shut down. And they were at the epicenter of all this stuff, the Atlantic Council. So where would you expect to find Mr. Free Speech? Elon Musk. Yeah, right there.

Right there. So she was awarded the prize you know for first of all being a woman that's what they said groundbreaking role as italy's first female prime minister okay so you get some points for being a woman and then her strong support of the european union not of italy not of italy she's not for Italy. She's for the European Union. She's a globalist. Strong support of the European Union and the Transatlantic

Alliance. Again, the Transatlantic Alliance, that's their code for NATO. And that's what the Atlantic Council is all about. Maloney urged the West to reject the idea of decline and to reaffirm its moral and democratic foundations well if we're going to talk about moral and democratic foundations and maybe you don't go to every single war maybe you distance yourself from nato who's all about preemptive war striking first you know we know those guys are bad we know eventually it's going to come to the

point where they're going to attack us let's attack them first that was rightly called infamy when japan did it to us even though we had already jumped into the war even though for practical purposes you know we're shipping massive amounts of supplies and arms to the declared belligerents we were effectively in the war and of course they looked at it and they said, yeah, well, you know, it's just a matter of time before the U.S. sends troops and gets involved that way. So what we'll do is we'll strike them first. That is the logic of the U.S.

That's the logic of NATO. That's the logic of Israel. That's the logic of the West now. We have adopted that heinous practice of preemptive strike it's immoral it's immoral that has never been justified never not even by pagan countries let alone by christian countries that's not justified and then you want to talk about decline what's she doing to her country in terms of opening up the border bringing in two times the number of people with no means of support anything else uh that were already in that island so uh she goes on to say we must resist the lure of authoritarianism oh okay so you're saying that to

the group that's been behind censorship the group that partnered with facebook the group that created the digital forensic lab we have to resist the lure of authoritarianism what hypocrisy to go to the atlantic council and to say that she said because the true strength of democracies lies in their values and their freedoms not in power alone what freedom if you don't have free speech folks you don't have any freedom you really don't that not the second amendment but the first amendment is the cornerstone of our foundations you're not even going to know who to shoot at if you don't have the

First Amendment. You're not even going to know the cause of why you are fighting if you don't have the First Amendment. And of course, the First Amendment can help you to stop this before it gets to the point of shooting. The Italian Premier reiterated her commitment

to Ukraine. See? It's a NATO organization for censorship. So she kowtows to Europe, abandons her people in Italy, kowtows to NATO for censorship. And she urged the West to stand firm against Russian aggression, a pivotal moment, she said, for the West in its defense of self-determination and freedom. It's not freedom of speech, right? Whatever freedom she's talking about, I'm not sure.

She said, we must not waver in our support for Ukraine. This is about more than borders, says the woman who ran on borders, on Italian borders, and then abandoned that cause. Now she's concerned about the Ukraine border, just like all of our politicians, Republican and Democrat. This is about more than borders. It's about the future of the global order and democracy, of course. Well, those are two different things. I'm talking about global order and democracy at the same time. This is like the French who talked about liberty, fraternity, and equality, right?

Brotherhood, liberty. You can have liberty and brotherhood. That's fine. But you can't have equality in the way that they talked about it, because the French, as the Jacobins, the early Marxist revolutionaries, they were about equality of results, not equality of opportunity. Yes, you can have liberty and equality of opportunity. You must have both of those. You have to have equality of opportunity if you're going to have liberty but if you're going to impose an equality of results that means that you talk you're talking

about an authoritarian dictatorial redistribution of wealth you're talking about marxism socialism collectivism or as the founders called it leveling leveling. You're going to level everybody, except for yourself, of course. You will have to be above everybody else so that you can do the leveling. Yeah, it's a bunch of doublespeak. And I don't see anybody calling them out on any of this stuff. All the people who report it, it's just about, ooh, look at this stuff you know all the people who report it it's just about oh look at this you know maloney and musk k-i-s-s-i-n-g sitting in the tree you know um one prominent admirer that georgio maloney has attracted is elon musk who said she's also someone who's authentic honest and truthful yeah after what i just told

you and that can't always be said about politicians yeah who's courting who though you know is he courting her or are musk and maloney courting the atlantic council or is the atlantic council courting musk and Maloney? Maloney then praised Musk's visionary leadership. Well, let me tell you something. They're both in bed with a war machine. They're both in bed with a globalist agenda. They're both in bed with the censors of free speech.

They're both controlled opposition. It's just that simple um when um uh as a matter of fact i'm not the only one that notices that uh must decries government censorship but his x platform has been even more compliant than Twitter under Jack Dorsey. And we got the metrics. This is the Washington Post. And look, you can look at this and say, this is mainstream media. They don't like him. But look at the metrics that they have.

They can tell you the truth. They sometimes, many times, they'll tell you the truth about their enemies. They'll lie about their friends. But they'll tell you the truth about their enemies. They'll lie about their friends, but they'll tell you the truth about their enemies. They never attacked Musk until he started making public statements in support of populism and Trump and things like that. Fundamentally, he hasn't changed. Ex-owner Elon Musk is the world's wealthiest flag bearer for free speech,

but under his leadership, the social media platform is acceding to government requests to take down or to withhold user content at a significantly higher rate than it did during the years leading up to his purchase. The site acted on 71% of illegal requests it received to remove content in the first half of this year, up 20% from the last time it reported the figure in 2021 and more than double the rate in preceding years, according to a new transparency report published on Wednesday and a Washington Post review of past disclosure data.

The findings highlight that while Musk has decried government attempts to censor content and blasted X's previous ownership for buckling the political pressure, the platform, since his takeover, appears to be complying with such demands even more frequently. And the disclosures are consistent with past media reports finding higher government compliance rates under Musk. I've said it over and over again. The shadow banning is actually worse, even though I paid his $8 a month, the shadow banning is actually worse even though i paid there is

eight dollars a month the shadow banning is even worse for me i talked yesterday about a guy who is a big fan boy of tesla and elon musk but he has had a lot of problems with his cyber truck he's on his third lemon they replaced them under the lemon law and he just said elon fix this boom you're shadow banned he can't get any engagement whatsoever he says he's still getting the same amount of engagement on other platforms um youtube facebook other things like that but he's banned um and so jason barker as a matter of fact is also documented uh how he was um you know being shadow banned on twitter oh it's very much a part of it so it is absolute hypocrisy for these people it's amazing to see how easily conservatives are fooled because they want to believe that there's amazing to see how easily conservatives are fooled

because they want to believe that there's going to be, if somebody's made billions of dollars, well, they must be a great businessman. Well, you know, that's one possibility. The other possibility is that they're a crook. Could be that, you know, they are the king of crony capitalism,

as Musk was. That's what Eric Peters and I first talked about more than a decade ago. The king of crony capitalism. L.A. Times ran one of a few rare reports criticizing Musk before he bought Twitter, started talking conservatively, when he did not talk about his politics, when he just got what he wanted in the back rooms with the politicians i said they called him king of crony capitalism they said he's got more than look at how many billions of dollars i forget what it was now how many billions of dollars that he's gotten of crony capitalism in the name of government

contracts and to push their agendas for electrification and all the rest of this stuff. But he moves to the right. And this is something we've seen with Chris Cuomo. It's something that, you know, he's got a long way to go before he can even reach the center. But he's getting pretty close, I guess, to where the center is and being radically left. He's reinventing himself after he was fired because he knows nobody's going to, you know, the only way that he can make a living being a radical left authoritarian is if he's working for some government-subsidized organization like CNN. So he's having to, in the name of self-preservation, moderate his views and try to back away from the lies

that he told people during the lockdown. And he's done more to back away from that stuff, quite honestly, than Trump has or any of the Trump supporters have. And so this is something that a lot of them are doing. And now the other person who's turning here is Mark Zuckerberg. Mark Zuckerberg now identifies as a libertarian yeah he's calling himself a classical liberal or libertarian he doesn't believe in big government this guy is put in business by darpa you believe any of this stuff and look at that

picture zoom in on that picture hey i think he identifies as Austin Powers. I don't think that this is, you know. See, doesn't he look like Austin Powers? And he's going to be telling us all, that's what he's been telling us on Facebook. Oh, behave. Well, he's not going to do that anymore. He's going to be a libertarian and he's got going to do that anymore he's going to be a libertarian and he's he's got his new glasses these these things that google and facebook come out with these glasses it always reminds me of that steve martin movie the jerk i mean doesn't it karen it's like uh it's uh you know when when

you look at uh if you've ever seen that movie, Steve Martin is this guy who makes an unbelievable fortune because of some glasses that he sells people. But then after he gets the money and people are using the glasses for a couple of months, everybody's starting to go cross-eyed. Then they all sue him and he loses everything. And he's worse off than he was before. Of course, that didn't happen with the trump shots did it the mrna there you go yeah the uh that's thanks that's the picture that's pretty good guys uh yeah the uh the jerk the jerk it's kind of like a farmer bro except there was consequences uh when it was done in the movies and so now we've got mark zuckerberg

libertarian man of mystery austin powers zuckerberg now identifies as a libertarian that feels a sense of hostility to government regulation this is just too rich i mean come on how many times are they going to pull this and this is just too rich i mean come on how many times are they going to pull this and and this is i've been laughing about this with musk with cuomo uh megan kelly megan kelly remember you know like trump said she had blood coming out of everywhere she's coming after him the very first debate of course he now remembers that as uh rosie o'donnell i think is what he called her the ultimate insult that's that's worse than saying she had blood coming out of everywhere to call her rosie o'donnell she's uh nearly anorexic anorexic now but um i know she's become

one of the biggest trump cheerleaders because that's where the money is i mean it you don't have to be a genius to see that's where the money is people are they used to do shows with that i can't do shows with anymore it's like forget the polls trump's gonna win this is what you know i mean just relentless trump cheerleading that's what everybody's doing everybody is whoring themselves out to this warmonger donald Trump. Just disgusts me. But anyway, he now feels a sense of hostility to government regulations as well as skepticism of initiatives that claim to advance so-called social justice. So Breitbart is going to try to help him along and explain his transition as being legit zuckerberg now considers his

political views to be more libertarian or in line with classical liberalism a position that's considered to be fiscally conservative but socially liberal well let me just let me just say this you know libertarianism has now become associated associated with fiscally conservative and socially liberal. But I don't know if you could say the same thing about classical liberalism. I can't imagine the people who were speaking out in terms of liberty, writing essays in the 1800s. I cannot imagine them getting on board with the LGBT agenda. That's what we mean by socially liberal today. I also can't imagine them getting on board with abortion either.

And so when we talk about classically liberal, right, we used to talk about a liberal education. What that meant was that that liberated you, right? Liberty, liberal, all the same root word. It was hijacked by the Marxists and the socialists in the early 20th century, that word, and it became something of a swear word, liberal. But what it really meant was that you supported liberty, and you still have some countries where people, you have liberal parties, and they have policies that would be identified as conservative.

But, of course, just like the conservatives, they don't really pay attention to liberty. It's amazing. In New South Wales, Gladys Berejiklian was part of the liberal party. Now, if you looked at her policies of tyranny, you would say, yeah, she sounds like a liberal but she was supposed to be somebody that supported individual liberty right and so a lot of people will say well i i you know classical liberal is what i am but uh that was lost on so many people but they came up with the term libertarian. Um, I saw the direction that the libertarian party was going.

And, uh, while I agree with Liberty, I didn't agree with the party. And, um, that's why I, I created my handle,

uh, 12 years ago on Twitter. I called it Liberty. Uh, but anyway, um, so now he is a classical liberal. He says sources added that Zuckerberg is also trying to repair his relationship with former President Trump.

Speaking to him twice in one-on-one cordial phone calls over the summer. Aw, the billionaires are friends. Let's be friends. Could we share some money or something sometime? We could get together and talk about our mansions. You got a very nice house mark very nice mine is better of course but yours is nice yeah uh so uh yeah actually uh mark's got more money than he's more gold mark that's what i tell him more gold that's kind of guilt everything yeah uh that's like when they did the movie the apprentice they they said uh that the sets

needed to look expensive but tasteless that's like that's trump for sure expensive but tasteless gilded with gold everywhere um you may be melting that down before long if the price of gold keeps going up uh anyway um so um i just here's one thing you know when i look at this and i look at this movement of all these people to uh to trump i wonder have they gotten word on the inside you know these guys know what's what's going on with the global governance and all the rest of the stuff and the inside clubs at bilderberg and all the rest of stuff have they gotten word that trump is going to be the selection this time if they're moving that far close to him i mean you know would they be going in the other

direction because he's made a very uh strong move towards trump and not anything at all toward lala a few weeks um later uh after he said uh on a few weeks later after the shooting where he praised trump called him a badass zuckerberg called trump a second time to apologize after meta erroneously took down iconic images of the assassination attempt uh the uh and then zuckerberg said um that he has yet to forge a relationship with vice president lala harris said the newspaper he doesn't call her lala i do um zuckerberg has decided not to engage with washington unless necessary and is instead working on his relationships with politicians behind the scenes yeah let's get together you know the davos let's do that davos lunch thing let's um

uh let's schmooze at bilderberg you know, because that's all just about building relationships. It's not about making any plans about taking over the world. Karen, tell the story again. When we were at Bilderberg in Copenhagen in 2014, that was the best and actually really the only time that the press was able to get close to the hotel where they were staying. I was right smack dab in the middle of the city, and the only thing that separated the press from them was a four-lane road. And so you could see everybody that was going into the building and so forth and so on. And some of them tried to go into the side exits, and Karen was over on a side exit one day and had a a guy uh who was um a high official in um the labor party his name was ed

balls and he was um trying to come in on the side and he didn't have he forgot his id stuff and he just had his roll rolling luggage with him and the guards would not let him in you know me i'm ed balls i'm the shadow secretary of the exchequer and all the rest of this stuff right and they were not impressed they wouldn't let him in so he goes to look through his luggage and he unzips it and when he does the contents fall out and it was a suitcase filled with paper that's it that's it no no clothes no toothbrush no id just papers but you know hey it's just no business work is being done they were operating under chatham house rules so nobody can say anything and um you know it's just uh it's just a friendly informal thing like like

zuckerberg does behind the scenes with trump and other people these relationships that they forged he was in the next election he he was the highest ranking official to lose his seat and uh anyway um good job, Karen. Zuckerberg has hired prominent Republican strategist Brian Baker to improve his status with conservative media and with Republican lawmakers. You know, just like Chris Cuomo is doing, Megyn Kelly and all of them. People close to Zuckerberg and his wife told the newspaper that the couple was caught off guard when their activism and their philanthropy backfired on them. After the summer of 2020, George Floyd riots a Chan Zuckerberg initiative employee because she still goes by her last name. So her name is Chan.

So the Chan Zuckerberg initiative, that's kind of like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. An employee there reportedly asked Zuckerberg during a staff meeting to resign from Facebook. He claimed that Zuckerberg had been unwilling to censor Trump on social media. If you're not going to censor Trump, what's your social media about anyway? Didn't they give you the order at DARPA? You're supposed to control this? Sources told the New York Times that the incident and others similar to it upset Zuckerberg and ultimately pushed him away from political work. So that's the backstory that's being fed to you by Breitbart.

I don't think it's about that at all. So he suddenly became a conservative because he was criticized by a super woke employee. Yeah, right. Zuckerberg is not the only tech titan who appears to have changed over the years with regards to politics. Notably, Elon Musk, says Breitbart, who was once relatively apolitical, has now turned X into the protector of free speech, according to Breitbart. Wow. Wow. Who owns Breitbart?

That's the question. Why are these people shilling for this? And they are absolutely shilling for Trump. It's absolutely amazing. feminism and racial ideology into articles well that's true and it is reprehensible but it is nothing nothing compared to what is going on with the chat ai chat programs i mean they've got entire companies big companies making lots and lots of money. Their sole purpose is to embed bias into the chat programs, the AI chat programs. And coming up, we're going to talk about the AI energy grift here and how they are clearing the decks. I mean, from the governor of Pennsylvaniasylvania to the energy secretary everybody's like we gotta we gotta get this right away we gotta get power to these people right away because that electrical power to run these ai stations is going to be the basis of their power their political power over you and that's the real fascism that is coming towards us. The artificial intelligence is going to be there not just to propagandize us like Wikipedia. Artificial intelligence will also be used to identify and to censor you.

It's about surveillance and censorship, not just propaganda. It also will include, of course, propaganda. But it's about all those things. And that's why they have to remove all obstacles for them to push this through. That is their key path to power coming up. And so when you look at some of the things that have surfaced about Wikipedia, for example, according to documents, Wikipedia paid a group called Art Plus Feminism $ feminism 382 000 to support work to further its mission

uh they um say um the organization says when cis and trans women i don't spell that it's not abbreviation of sister that's the cis that's their invented word that they've used to label people who are normal. Normal. When cis and trans women, non-binary people, black, indigenous, people of color communities are not represented in the writing and the editing on the 10th most visited site in the world. Information about people like us gets skewed and misrepresented. That's the problem. You know, people like the rest of us, the rest of us information about the rest of us,

besides this tiny vocal Marxist minority, the information about the rest of us is getting skewed and misrepresented. Uh, they say they have to decolonize the internet. No, what they're doing is they've colonized the internet. They have colonized the internet's culture. They've used it now, and they're using it to colonize our history,

our culture, our society, our values. It is a struggle. It is a struggle. And, you know, just as Scott Sherrill was talking about the other day, that's really part of our spiritual war. We don't struggle with flesh and blood. We struggle with ideas. Ideas that are put there by principalities and powers that you don't see.

They're further behind the scenes than Bilderberg. And they're higher up than the people who meet at Bilderberg. But it's those satanic ideas that are pushed out. That's where the fight is. That's where the fight is. So they gave. I just want to break in. This sort of stuff is pushed everywhere. files. And every single day, there is some horrifying piece of feminist, black, queer

propaganda that they're pushing on the front page. Like, this is how someone is decolonizing art. It's like, shut up. Oh, yeah, it's really bad. And of course, we don't pay them, folks, just so that you know, it's free. So we're using their bandwidth and taking stuff from them. But every single day, I get this stuff shoved in my face, and it drives me insane. By the way, that's one of the reasons why. And I apologize because when we send – when I would transfer the Christmas album to people, I would use it as a free service. If you don't pay them, it disappears after a short period of time.

They used to give us a week. I think they've shortened it to three days. So we're probably going to have to find a different way to send stuff to people i mean for us it's okay uh we get it right away when we send files um you know but um when travis is out of town and that type of thing but yeah it is um you know for something like uh giving people the album or something we may have to find something else because they've shortened it up because we use the free service there but we they still push those those vile pictures it is really beyond creepy there's anything like it uh wikipedia co-founder calls wikipedia shameless in 2021 wikipedia co-founder larry singer slammed the company its bias. He wrote in a blog that quote,

Wikipedia openly repudiates neutrality and is shamelessly hypocritical in how it continues to pay lip service to its neutral point of view policy. Well, that's all of this stuff, right? All of it. I mean, if you're not cynical yet about the press in the same way that the Russian

people, when they had two media outlets pravda and asvestia uh truth and news they said there's no truth in pravda no news in asvestia if you haven't reached that level of cynicism yet oh you're not paying attention uh we're way beyond that and it's going to get much much worse as AI gets to be a much, much more powerful tool. And then, of course, Wikipedia has been a tool of vaccine propaganda, especially, especially AI. My immediate contempt for chat GPT and the rest of this, because I started asking questions about the germ game MacGuffin and about the climate MacGuffin. And I saw right away how this thing had been programmed. about the germ game MacGuffin and about the climate MacGuffin. And,

um, I saw right away how this thing had been programmed. So, um, on Brownstone, David Bell has an essay, the right to speak evil. And we're going to talk about that when we come back in light of what is

going on with info wars as the last, the last 24 hours, 48 hours or whatever. There's been a statement that InfoWars is going to be liquidated. Well, I have some ideas about what I think is going to really happen with that. A little bit different from the people who are reporting on it who were never on the inside. And I have some statements that I want to make about free speech and how this is not about free speech in spite of what you've been told. We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back. Thank you. Making sense. Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.

All right. Rockfan Greg Talent, thank you very much. I appreciate that. The Tip and Dustin Helm. Thank you. And Marky Mark, New Jersey says, as Balzac once said, behind every great fortune is a crime. Yeah, that's true. I know what the crime is behind Bill Gates's fortune. Copyright violation, intellectual property theft.

He stole that operating system from digital research and perhaps one of the biggest crimes is the fact that he hasn't fixed it for over 50 years the whole thing is built on a core that was something that was put out in the 1970s early 1970s digital research is cpm he stole it from them and got away, beat them in court. But he uses all of the, didn't even change the syntax, still calls it BIOS. And the whole thing is built on a foundation. All of Windows is built on a foundation of sand. It really is quite awful. No one fixes anything in a technology anymore.

No. I know in gaming that they run with a policy of if a game ships with a bug and people don't complain about it and it's not game-breaking, they will ship the next version with the same bug because they have to fix other new bugs. Yeah, and what's even worse is the planned obsolescence. I've got an old laptop. I will not update it because if I update it,

it'll break my machine. I just know it'll break my machine. I've gone down that road. I updated this thing here that I use. They seem to be very connected to their user community. SuperNote did and took a lot of feedback with it. And I'd had, well, let me try and it's kind of worried about it. So I did the first update and it's like, oh, great. They added some new features that are very useful.

Did that a second time. That was good too. This last time? No, no. Broke a bunch of stuff. Anyway, let's talk about the right to speak evil. That's really what free speech is. If you don't support speech that you disagree with,

speech that you don't like, then you don't support free speech. Now, this is from Brownstone, David Bell. And I say this in light of what is going on with Sandy Hook, right? Because Sandy Hook, first of all, I'll tell you in a moment why it was not about free speech. It was not about Infowars free speech. But it did become a rallying cause for saying that we have to punish people if they hurt somebody's feelings.

Because, you know, Sandy Hook is really more about Sandy hurt, how had hurt feelings. And I tell you, you know, my problem with Alex is the people that were really hurt. The people that were really hurt, his own supporters, January the 6th. The people that were really hurt when he pushed the lockdown and told people that it was 4D chess, when he pushed the jab and told people it's sugar water. And when he made record profits doing both of those things, that's reprehensible. But that's not what he's being punished for. He's being punished because he supposedly hurt somebody's feelings. Well, David Bell at Brownstone says words can harm. The childhood saying sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me is obviously untrue. Words bring ruin and and despair they drive people to suicide

they foment massacres and war they're used to justify the enslavement of nations and the genocide of entire ethnic groups uh and he says but this is exactly why we must all always be free to speak them. Yeah, the way it's put in the Bible, the tongue is a fire. It is a world of evil. It corrupts the whole body. It sets the course of one's life on fire. And it itself is set on fire by hell.

We have to be careful what we say. We have to look at it. We have to always look at what our motives are. Are we trying to, it's not enough even really just to say, well, I want to say the truth, but if we're saying it to stop people from being hurt is where I believe. This is my personal belief. That even if you say something that other people might consider to be slanderous or harmful, if you're doing it to save people from being harmed, save people from being robbed,

save people from losing their life, being put in jail, being disabled for life, that type of thing. We have to expose those kind of lies, just like we have to expose the kind of lies that are going to lead us into a war. And if that means that we point out the lies and the hypocrisy of the liars, so be it. That's my understanding of it. And that's what I go by. In the world in which we live, says David Bell,

lies and deceit exist in all of us. They drive us to speak evil. And the more we can isolate ourselves from harm, from our words do, the more evil we are able to speak. A holocaust could happen because some people built a structure within which only they could speak as they wished whilst preventing others from talking back tyranny and pogroms thrive in one-way conversations the hallmark of a tyrant is to come after free speech. When war begins, the first casualty is truth and speech.

And it is a war against us, a war against our values, a war against our spiritual beliefs, our society, our culture, everything. It is a war. And they seek to make sure that only one side is going to be heard. The safe spaces of censorship currently enable countries to bomb children while convincing themselves that they're making things better. Or, if you want to get dangerous, you can talk about Trump. You can say you could poison people by the millions and then still, like Trump, tell people that you saved tens of millions of lives. When exactly the opposite is true.

Bad things can happen both as a result of free speech and due to a lack of free speech. Free speech is not about truth. But it's about putting limits on power that's key free speech is not about truth but it's about putting limits on power uh like i said before you know they many people understand that the answer to a bad man with a gun is a good man with a gun the answer to a bad man with a gun is a good man with a gun. The answer to a bad man with speech is a good man with speech. And if you start controlling guns and you start controlling speech, we've got much bigger problems. So,

um, on rumble, Anona moose, thank you for the tip. Uh, it says I'm writing, I'm looking for a job in it. I just turned down an offer from a public health job in BC, Canada.

$105,000 a year. Critical race theory and vaccine Nazis helping the indigenous victims. The first vaxxed Canadians. Yeah, they went after them first, didn't they? Wow. Well, good for you. Yeah, as I've said, I think, yeah, you can't be bought. That's good. That, good for you. Yeah. As I've said, I think, um, yeah, you can't be bought. That's good. That's good. Um,

and so many people, you know, I was talking about yesterday that consumer confidence is down at the lowest level it's been since August of 2021. And what was happening in August, 2021, everybody was looking at this and saying, I don't know if I'm going to have a job or career because they're going to force this vaccine on me they're going to coerce it and you want to talk about something's going to kill your confidence is when you you know i think i'm going to lose

everything uh we're at that point now though because there's other things that mainstream media is not telling you what What's damaging consumer confidence? Well, what we actually see happening in the economy, what we see happening in wars and other things like that. And then, of course, this downward spiral, as the entire country is being drugged down by politics and presidential candidates, and we can't think of what we're going to do without Washington fixing it for us. And without having the right person in Washington, we're lost. So we just might as well have a civil war at this point, right?

That's the other thing that I want people, I'm trying to tell people, well, you want to talk about somebody being blackpilled. It's all of these MAGA media people saying well this is it this is the most important election of our lifetime and if we lose this election that's it there'll never be another election democracy is finished blah blah we might as well just pull out the guns and start shooting people and you got people on the left who do that as well but mainly it's people on the right and this is this is what this cult leads to. You know, you think everything can be fixed by this Messiah-like figure.

And he's a phony Messiah. He's a false Messiah. He can't fix it, even if he wanted to. He can't fix it alone. But free speech is not about truth, but it's about putting limits on power. That's the key thing. And that's why we have to defend free speech in general. But see, the problem is, is that this lawsuit, this Sandy lawsuit,

never got to the point of defending free speech. Because free speech systems that owns Infowars is about making money. That's his first and foremost goal is to make money, not about free speech. And that's why you have the kind of things like this said so that he could have record profits in the spring of 2020. Very weak, attenuated classic viruses

with a very low amount of adjuvant in it trump's looking at basically sugar water for folks can we take a little bit of a attenuated you know microwaved or radiated uh covid deal absolutely oh yeah he's taking control do it for trump do it for trump yeah absolutely do it for trump please yeah yeah all of that was a lie first of all there was no virus secondly had not been isolated third you don't uh kill a virus all right if they were true if they were right about all this stuff viruses aren't alive uh and then to say that come on you can take the you know for for 20 plus years I've been telling you that these adjuvants like aluminum and mercury are what's behind autism. And he told the truth about that.

But he tells you, come on, you can take a little bit of that. It's just like sugar water. Go ahead. Take your aluminum, inject your aluminum, inject your mercury that I've been telling you for 20 years is awful. Do it for Trump. He's playing 4D chess. Support him.

Support him as he's locking everything down, as he's killing Main Street America, as he's destroying the Constitution, as he's preparing everybody for universal basic income. Follow him. He's playing 4-D chess. Yeah, he was playing 4-D chess, all right. Absolutely was playing 4-D chess.

And he made, as it came out, an interesting thing about the trial was that it came out about his record profits. But of course, I was there. I knew he was making record profits. I just didn't know the magnitude of it that was happening. As he was betraying his supporters, his country, the Constitution, so that he could support Trump, who was supporting a globalist agenda that Alex had been warning people about for decades. The ultimate betrayal.

And then later in the year, he did this. The White House told me three days before, we're going to have you lead the march. The Secret Service, before Trump finishes 30 minutes before, so we'll lead you to a point, take you out of the front row and lead you to the place where they want you to start the march, and Trump will tell people, go and I'm going to meet you at the Capitol. Judiscote. Leading the people to slaughter. He instituted that along with a CIA agent, Steve Petrini.

Nobody working for the deep state. Lies from the very beginning. They started Stop the Steal and all this stuff. He paid for the Stop the Stealing. Why did he not get punished? Why are there so many people in jail, many of them for decades? He walked free. That seems suspicious to you.

It does to me. So, look, the Sandy Hook families suffered nothing, nothing, compared to the victims of the sugar water. The Sandy Hook families suffered nothing compared to what happened to the J Sixers, nothing compared to that. But he pays no price for that. Instead, they make it about the shooting. They make it about hurt feelings. And look, you know, it is the interesting thing too, is as I said, you know it is the interesting thing too is as I said you know it the the tongue is a fire and it can destroy the path of your life and it certainly did for Alex because Steve Pchenik who was pushing the stop the

steal thing with a lies two days after the election was also the one who came in with nobody died. He pulled that on Alex and he tried to pull it on me after that Las Vegas shooting in October. Came on and said nobody died. I said, come on, come on. That's not true at all. But Alex started repeating that. See, if you trust the CIA,

they'll kill you too, if you're part of the CIA. But of course, they look after their own in certain ways as well. But the Sandy Hook families didn't suffer anything comparable to these people that he was acting like a pied piper to, he was a judas goat too and his earnings during sandy hook were nothing compared to what he made uh betraying the constitution his country his listeners with the lockdown pandemic and the election garbage that was happening there in the spring and the fall of 2020. So what is going to happen with this liquidation and bankruptcy? Well, you know, I've been through bankruptcy as a creditor and I know how this whole corrupt system works. We talk about our corrupt court systems and everything well hope that you never get involved in bankruptcy as a creditor with that and um uh you know we were told that the group in in uh connecticut

wanted info war shut down the group in texas didn't want it and so what was the deciding factor i'll tell you what the deciding factor was a bankruptcy trustee who has been adamant that he wants to shut this thing down. Why? Because the bankruptcy trustees make so much money. They make a percentage of everything that's liquidated, and he gets his money now. He's not going to make much money,

or it's going to be deferred over a long period of time if they were to have a gradual payout of this judgment, which, again, the judgment was absurd. The judgment was absurd. The harm, and it was harm there was slander and things like that but you know this this ridiculous amount of uh the the amount of money was absolutely absurd uh but i think that um the lawyers also wanted to have the settlement and liquidation now so they could get their money so So the lawyers and the trustees want it now.

One of the groups said they want it now. The other one said, no, I'd rather get more money spread out over a longer period of time. So now what they're saying is that they're going to liquidate it and sell it in November. So, you know, I know how this whole system goes. But the question is now with a lot of people is, is Alex going to continue? Well, of course he would. Alex is never going to go off air. Never.

He'll always operate, even if he operates as a as a individual. He was operating as an individual before he hired a bunch of us in 2012. It was just him on the radio program and then he decided that what he wanted to do was to um you know send reporters out on a regular basis and then to have news around the clock and that type of thing but you know that is a um he made a lot of money with the supplements and things like that but i along with that uh comes a great deal of complications so i don't know i think he'd probably be just uh fine to go out and do his own podcast or something i mean you know he looks at joe rogan and joe rogan is making the kind of money that alex did you know 25 30 million dollars a year and he's he doesn't have to uh have all the

overhead uh that alex does so maybe he's fine with that i I think it'll be the people that work there that'll maybe have some big issues. But not so much Alex. Maybe he'll get his fans to buy. You know, there was a Musk parody site that put it up yesterday. It got a lot of attention because a lot of people, even though it says Elon Musk, in parentheses, parody at the top, a lot of people thought it was real. It says, should i do something funny and it retweeted that you know it's a shop buy in other words should i buy in for wars all right do it do it well you know he's got he's already talking about how he's got um what's

his fans to buy it or something like that well i don't know his dad is unbelievably wealthy his dad was a dentist his dad had a chain of dental places throughout austin castle dentistry and everything so he's not just a dentist but he owns multiple dentist places family had a lot of money before that the family was involved with the cia as well so i mean he's swimming in money and the bottom line the reason that this is not about free speech is because Alex never participated in that issue. They never went to trial. If you remember, the trial was to determine what the damages were going to be, what the money was going to be. That's what the trial was about.

And so the trial just focused on their finances and things like that. But it never focused on the issue of free speech. And the reason for that is because Alex refused to comply with discovery. And in the same way that if somebody files a lawsuit against you and you don't reply to that lawsuit, you lose. You lose. And if the lawsuit proceeds and you don't comply with discovery, you lose. Now, Alex says that he gave them all the information and more that they wanted, and yet when his lawyer accidentally sent the phone information to the opposing counsel

and caught Alex on the stand, and Alex's reply, oh, this is your Perry mason moment it really was a perry mason moment it's exactly the type of thing the way every perry mason episode went in you know you get the you catch the guy red-handed you know right there on the stand and they caught him red-handed right there on the stand uh you know there was a lot of information there that he claimed that he didn't have he didn't turn it in in. They all knew that he was stonewalling them. They all knew that he wasn't complying with discovery. And then they proved it during the trial, during the Perry Mason moment.

So why wouldn't he comply with it? For the same reason that he's going to continue with his broadcast. I believe that he's been stashing money all over the place. Cayman Islands, you name it. He went down to Cayman Islands several times. So I think during the trial, somebody sent him $9 million from a single donor. His audience didn't even blink about that. Didn't even think about that twice. Where did that come from?

Did Alex send that to himself from crypto? He made a big deal of saying, well, I lost all that crypto money that was given to me in the early days by Max Kaiser. Max was an early adopter of crypto, and he gave him a lot of coins, full coins. Well, I lost all that stuff. That'd be worth $100 million or something now. I don't know what the amount was, but a tremendous amount of money. So did he really lose it? Did he take that $9 million out of his crypto?

Or did some rich benefactor, some billionaire, because he's always, he's got a lot of billionaire friends that he hangs around with all the time. Or was it somebody that was an intelligence agency? Did the CIA sent him the nine million dollars because the cia is not monolithic and people like steve pachinik are part of the military intelligence the right wing part of the intelligence agency is not cia i say the cia but you know it's the intelligence community people

like pachinik uh jack basobiec, other people I know, they're part of the right-wing intelligence agencies, still pushing wars, still pushing coups, still pushing assassinations, as Pachinik was involved in the assassination of the Italian prime minister, said an Italian court that investigated it. So this was not a trial over free speech uh he lost his summary judgment he lost it because he didn't want to comply with discovery and so i think he's got more than enough resources to say that you know to buy uh info wars himself

through some you know uh person that he sets up as a front and to continue on operations. And whether or not he does that, maybe if he doesn't want to continue on with InfoWars, maybe he'll let it be sold off and he'll continue on as an individual. So he could have, he should have, defended his right to say mean things.

He could have, he should have, defended his right to say mean things. He could have, he should have defended his right to say the wrong thing. And of course, everybody has the right to be wrong. If somebody contacts you and says you were wrong about this, you even have a period of time where you can make that correction and then there is no liability. But there would have been liability, but to say that it was $1.5 billion is just beyond absurdity. But this has really worked out for his advantage, just like this unjustified lawfare against Trump

has worked out to Trump's advantage. Both of them have fundraised off of these things tremendously, and both of them are now seen off of these things tremendously. And both of them are now seen as heroes, as victims, as martyrs. And so he's not been hurt by it. He'll be fine. He'll be better than ever. And this is not about free speech.

It's about money. It really is about money. It's about money on both sides. And it's also about who you can trust. It's also about being controlled opposition. And that's why I speak about this. It's because there's still people who trust Trump. Still people who trust Alex.

People who trust Musk. You cannot trust them. Congratulate them when they do or say the right thing. Fine. Never trust them. Understand that they are the ones who are playing 40 chess. They are the ones who have cards that they're not showing. Getting back to his essay, he says, we can and we should hate what others do when they harm innocent people with the jabs, with the lockdowns, with the January 6th and things like that. But we should recognize such tendencies also in ourselves.

That does not mean that we hate the other person just as we don't hate ourselves, but we hate what is wrong as we try to purge that out of ourselves. And so we have to engage in introspection as well and try to look at our motives. And I've thought about this and I thought, well, should I say anything or not? I always get criticized when I do this. You're just a disgruntled former employee. No, I'm very, very grateful to God. He has protected and provided for my family through you, through the audience. And we have been able to move to the area of the

country, the area of the world, actually. I've traveled extensively. I've never been anywhere that I like better than eastern Tennessee. And it's just, you know, it's not to say that it's the best place in the world, but it's the best place in the world for me. Everybody's got to figure out where, you know, everybody's got different things that they're looking for. So for other people, it would not be the place for them.

But for me and my family, it is. And so I'm grateful to God that we're here. I'm grateful that we have been supported by you. And so I'm not bitter about this. And I'm saying this because the thing that I get angry about is when people are lied to and harmed and when it's done for money. And I'm not going to be silent about that. I can't be silent about that. Hate speech that involves stating a hatred or dislike is itself neither good nor bad. It depends on the context. It is simply stating a feeling or an emotion.

I hate the way some men in the town grew up and bashed their wives. I hate the child marriage. An abuse are acceptable. And I hate what is done to babies being ripped apart in our society. I mean, we can think of all these different things that we can and we should hate. These are actions. But as we hate abortion. We also try to hold out an opportunity for people to change, to be forgiven. The key part of that is to admit our faults. And, you know, I have not yet seen a politician who has admitted their faults for what they did. In any country, in any political party, none of them have said that they were wrong for what they did in any country, in any political party, none of them have said that they were wrong for what they did in 2020.

Not a single one. None of the people who cheered them on, like Alex, have said that they were wrong about any of this stuff. None of them. None of them have repented. It's the same thing you're seeing right now with Mark Robinson. You know, somebody was saying, well, he's got really a powerful testimony of how he turned around and changed, but he won't use that because he's not going to say that, yeah, I did that.

We all fall, but that's not me anymore. I've changed. He's not going to say that. That'd be a very important thing for him to air. You know, we don't stay sinless. But as Christians, we have to stay forgiven. We have to confess our sins. And if we're public figures and our sins are public,

we have to make those confessions public. And we haven't seen anybody do that. We've seen Danielle Smith, as I played yesterday. She said, look at what happened. We're never never going to let that happen she's criticizing what happened but she wasn't there and so it's easy for her to criticize what her predecessor did and the same thing with javier malai in argentina he's criticizing lockdown it's easy for him to do because he wasn't in power when that happened. So I guess we're going to have to wait until Trump is out of power and forgotten before we can get anything done to stop this from happening again.

Because right now it's so important that we must not criticize Trump, no matter what happens. Do not criticize him. Don't criticize what he did. And look, this is the thing. You know, I don't criticize what he did and look this is the thing you know i don't really care about trump's personality his trump his personality doesn't set me on fire like it does the liberals i really don't care uh what bothers me is his character that was already on display you know his rapacious greed you know was about everything. That's what it is

the whole thing. The Apprentice, the beginning of it. Money, money, money, money. It was all about money. The love of money is the root of all evil. And guess what? So is the addiction to sex that was so evident within his life. All of those speak to a character issue. And that was my issue with Trump. But we already knew what the character of Hillary Clinton was. And like Julian Assange, who leaked that information about Hillary Clinton, he says, we know that Hillary Clinton is a criminal and a warmonger. We don't know what Trump is.

I guess we'll find out. Well, Trump was the guy who locked him up. This is his administration. When he put in CIA, Bill Barr, Bill Barr immediately tried to kill Julian Assange. They even had a scenario where they would assassinate him and that type of thing. So it's important for us to oppose these issues and as i said i despise the trump presidency i despise what he did i think he should stand trial at a nuremberg trial you know he just had this last week alex had a lot of attention because uh he confronted francis collins said that francis

collins killed 20 million people well francis Francis Collins killed 20 million people. Well, if Francis Collins killed 20 million people, Alex, your boy, Trump, was the one he was working for. Why didn't your boy, Trump, do something about it? And, of course, Trump is responsible when it happens under his administration. And so Francis Collins doesn't say anything. He walks off, and Alex says, Nuremberg 2.0, it's coming up, Nuremberg 2.0. It's like, okay, well, if that comes up, then your guy Trump and Biden and Fauci and Burks and Redfield and Francis Collins and all of them, all of them ought to be in the dock in a Nuremberg 2.0. And maybe you should be there as their Goebbels.

But, yeah, we're going to give a pass this is this is why we can't because oh we can't say anything negative about trump or negative about anything that he did we got to pretend that everything that he did is fine i'm not playing that game the ability to speak freely going back to brownstone the ability to speak freely enables us to call out others' flaws and to acknowledge those pointed out in ourselves. A king who has a court of yes-men is in grave danger of harming his people and himself, and that's the problem with Trump, and that's the problem with the MAGA media. It is a court of yes-men. These people have made themselves the court jesters of Trump. They're clowns.

They're clowns. And not just Alex. People like Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, on and on and on. It just, they're all court jesters. They understand that in this day and age, what you do is you sell information that fits the bias of your audience. You go out, you read the room, you figure out what the audience wants to hear, and you tell them what they want to hear.

And they'll love you for it and so uh one of the things that you're seeing happening over and over again both sides are playing this game oh look trump made threats against people he said something mean and nasty against people so this is the legacy of this Sandy Hook thing, but it's also the trajectory of where they've been going. It wasn't, you know, Sandy Hook is just one of the things along the way. This agenda existed before Sandy Hook, independent of Sandy Hook. Sandy Hook helped to reinforce it, though. And this idea that you can't say anything that would hurt somebody's feelings.

Or you're responsible for the violence right if you hurt their feelings it's the same as if you kill the kids right and alexa said i didn't kill the kids everybody's acting like i killed the kids he didn't kill the kids but that's what they're doing and they're playing that game the left plays that game with trump and trump and the maga media court jesters play that game uh with the other side here's an example okay this is from infowars site itself they focused on this and of course a lot of different trump maga media did they said look at this biden went on with the view and as they're comparing him to a bug biden yeah i would smash him like that he's trying to kill trump then he just wouldn't go he's like a bug he just kept being there he's like a like a bug right there. So you felt.

Yeah, okay. It's like a bug. And so he smacks the thing. And they are peeing in their pants at InfoWars. And by the way, it's the same writer who, when I i somebody sent that sugar water clip to me when i played that and i posted it that same writer who did an article about how horrible this is look at this biden wants to kill trump that same writer when i put up that sugar water stuff uh mocks me as a whining crying baby because it bothers me that alex told people it was sugar

water that he told them to go ahead and take the adjuvants that have been causing autism for decades and they told them about that go ahead and take the sugar water vaccine it's harmless you can do it for trump how pathetic these people have become out, prostituted themselves for their job, for their political goals or whatever. It's mostly for their job. And then when you look at what Trump does on the other side. They were very brave, the Supreme Court, very brave. And they take a lot of hits because of it. It should be illegal what happens.

You know, you have these guys uh like playing the ref like the great bobby knight these people should be put in jail the way they talk about our judges and our justice history yeah anybody that criticizes trump jail them okay lock them up or whatever and and we've heard i've played the clips i won't play them again for you lala harris i don't like what Musk did. He violated his privilege. He should have his privilege taken away. And Jake Tapper's like, but he shouldn't have a privilege to speak. Free speech is not a privilege.

It's a right. And then Trump said the same thing about ABC. He didn't like the way he was treated. And he wasn't treated fairly. I agree. But his response to that was to say that they've got a license and their license should be taken away no we should never license free speech we should never jail people because we don't like what they say and yet the maga media

is out there saying oh look at this oh yeah they they made this look we have always had metaphors like that. We should go back and take a look at what people were saying about each other when Jefferson was running against John Adams. Or look at what they said about Abraham Lincoln. I mean, there's a great deal to criticize about Abraham Lincoln, but they went way over. They called his father a nutmeg addict or something like that. He's addicted to spices it was hatchet faced son of a nutmeg dealer that's even better yeah thank you i knew he always corrects me he remembers that better than i do hatchet faced son of a nutmeg dealer he's a dealer he's a drug dealer those drug dealers selling nutmeg they ought to be executed says trump yeah absolutely yeah our drugs because we had prohibition our drugs have gotten a

lot stronger than nutmeg now haven't they uh no there is um not going to be any criticism that's allowed of whoever they like so the left is going to complain when when trump criticizes one of their that's out of bounds this guy needs he's dangerous is going to complain when, when Trump criticizes one of their, that's out of bounds. This guy needs to be, he's dangerous. He needs to be locked up because we've got to lock up free speech. And the right, the MAGA people,

Infowars does the same thing. How dare them say they're all about free speech in the wake of the Sandy Hook thing. And then say that Biden is guilty of trying to get Trump killed. What hypocrisy on their website. What hypocrisy to defend the lies about January the 6th and the vaccines. There's no excuse for that. So there's no criticism, no debate.

You just got to follow the leader. I was never really very good at playing that game. I wasn't very good at playing the game, as Simon says, either that fauci tried to run on us uh to finish up the brownstone article he said it is the comfort of serving those who have adopted a right to control them clucking at the misfits pulled out for slaughter this is simply feudalism and oppression and it's being sold by the maga people just as much as it's being sold by the others and so when you look at thomas massey yesterday i talked about january 6th thomas massey in a hearing um says i personally think that this is a sleeper story the day so many lawmakers and pundits were decried as crazy for suggesting that there

could be quote confidential human sources involved in january the 6th and it looks like there might have been i said from two days after the election when info wars and steve pachinik started selling the stop the sting thing i stopped the steel said that oh yeah trump's already got 20 000 soldiers national guard out there they're arresting people the whole thing was a sting we marked the ballots we got blockchain watermark ballots and we got quantum computing and we know exactly who rigged this election and they're arresting them right now well that didn't age too well i knew it wouldn't uh but alex kept having him on and he kept spinning these lies in different directions and so i opposed it and was fired i was fired for that of course alex said

he was fired he fired me because he needed more money of course and daily beast picked that up said look at info wars is going out of business they had to fire uh had to fire one of their guys and all the rest of this stuff. The only people that were fired were Travis and I a week before Christmas. But, you know, that's fine. I mean, God immediately blessed us. We had people started sending donations and support. And so, you know so we started the program the following Monday. It was a really rough thing.

We had no cameras. We had an iPhone that Whistler held up. And I had lost a tooth over the weekend. You know, you talk about, it's like, I don't know. We got to start this show show and i'm missing a tooth up front and um so it was it was it was crazy bad but but uh we're really blessed by you and by god and uh so we did that but i told people all the way up to january the 6th i said don't go because there's going to be i didn't call it confidential human sources

as Thomas Massey did. I said, they're going to be agent provocateurs. And I said it all the way through and right up to the morning of January the 6th. Don't go. There's going to be agent provocateurs. They're going to entrap you. They're going to weaponize us. They're going to claim that you did things that you didn't do. And then they're going to use it to demonize the entire movement and the Constitution and all the rest of the stuff. But people went anyway. I told him, I said, the time to show up in mass and protest was when Trump locked us down. But Alex was telling you he was on your side. I said, don't follow him into this. I said, this is a trap. Well, it was four and a half years ago.

Now Thomas Massey is saying the same thing. And it wasn't just that I was decried for it. I was fired for it. I'm fine. I'm fine. It's a badge of honor to be fired for that. Alex said it was because he needed the money. And people didn't buy that. So then when they started saying that, no, no, we're financially, we're sound.

Then he started coming up with all different kinds of excuses. And I said, when I got on air, I said, he's got more excuses and explanations for what he did than Hillary does for Benghazi. And he changes them about as frequently as she did. So, you know, we look at this. I'm not going to, you know uh mitt romney is saying and just like a lot of leftists if trump is elected i'm leaving the country uh michael cohen has said that mitt romney said that a lot of people look i'm i'm opposed to trump i'm not leaving the country good or bad i'm gonna stick this thing out i'm not gonna be intimidated by him or by anybody else and so this is actually from pj media and they were actually sympathetic to alex but this is

what they put up at the i saw this and i thought what in the world uh they've got alex doing his uh schticks you know he loves to do performances and so they got him there as dressed up as a frog. And they say prediction InfoWars will go down in history as the next Drudge report. I don't think so. I don't think he's going to go away. And as a matter of fact, I don't even think that Matt Drudge went away. But that's the basis of his article. He thinks

that Matt Drudge sold the site and somebody switched it. And he thinks that same thing is going to happen with InfoWars. He said, well, somebody buy InfoWars, hire Alex Jones as his on-air talent, and then try to rebuild the platform. It's possible. Jones has some deep pocketed fans like his dad,

like his bankers in the Cayman Islands. I mean, like the CIA people. Yeah, he could have any of those people could buy it and keep him and keep him going um and um so he said uh i suspect however that a number of alex jones critics greatly dwarfs the number of fans the ultimate fate of info wars will eerily be similar to the fate of the drudge report he said he says at one point drudge was the biggest alternative platform in the world he scooped the mainstream media on the most important monumental story of the entire 90s the clinton lewinsky sex scandal and for decades that followed all drudge had to do was to post a link to an article and traffic would shoot

through the stratosphere that's right um he was the preeminent kingmaker in independent journalism wherever rush limbaugh turned whenever rush limbaugh turned on his ditto cam, you almost always saw his monitor tuned to Drudge. Today, of course, the Drudge Report is like Southern California, a place we used to visit and enjoy, but it's gotten so bad that nobody goes there anymore. The Drudge Report has become a zombie aggregator, an undead lumbering presence in the digital media, coasting on its past laurels, hemorrhaging readers' influence and credibility.

So question, why would an investor purchase a brand like the Dredge Report, a site with an established, successful business model, and then toss that model out the window? He says, well, my answer is because they weren't primarily motivated by profits. Instead, they bought the site to silence and to control their opposition. I completely disagree with his assessment of the Drudge Report and what he thinks will happen with Alex Jones. Drudge Report became big reporting on the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. Where did Drudge get that information? Does this guy know? He got the information from George Conway,

who was a lawyer involved in it, for Monica Lewinsky. George Conway, Kellyanne Conway's husband. George Conway, who loathes Trump with a passion, in case you've not noticed. I mean, you talk about somebody with Trump derangement syndrome. Who was Matt Drudge seen with most often? Ann Coulter.

Who, after she called him God Emperor, blasphemously, then flipped another 180 degrees, since when he didn't do anything about the border and started attacking him because again he didn't follow through he didn't do anything about the border in spite of what maga thinks he did nothing about the border so matt drudge's friends as a matter of fact you know he's very close with george conway going back to California when he was friends with Breitbart. What's his first name now? Can't even remember. But, you know, the guy that Breitbart's named after, who died suddenly, mysteriously. Andrew Breitbart.

Andrew, thank you. Andrew Breitbart, who died under, I think, suspicious circumstances. So Matt was friends with Andrew Breitbart. He was friends with Ann Coulter. He was close friends with George Conway, who made his career. I don't think that Matt Drudge sold the website. I think he's still doing it. And I think it's not just because...

He just sold something else. Well, I don't think it's just because his friends don't like Trump. Drudge came to InfoWars in, was it 2015? Fall of 2015? Yeah, that sounds about right. He came to InfoWars. I was able to meet him and talk to him for a while. And he went on air and said, I've been told by a Supreme Court justice that the hammer is really going to drop on free speech

and it's going to get really, really bad. And that was in 2015. Within less than about three or four months, Antolin Scalia was found with a pillow over his head under strange circumstances. And I went out there, that, uh, that motel actually stayed at that motel to look at it. What a, I mean, that place is just, it is the most, um, uh, I've never been in a place that had that kind of satanic vibe to it. And of course it was nobody at all there when I was staying there. So,

I mean, there was a crew of us from info wars that went out to take pictures and stuff. And it was unbelievably strange out in the middle of nowhere in West Texas. And all this occultic artwork and everything all over the place. I mean, it was like some kind of Agatha Christie novel where everybody goes to some weird haunted mansion. They start disappearing one at a time. I mean, it was creepy beyond belief.

And the fact that Scalia would go there for a vacation was really strange. I mean, there's nothing else anywhere around there except the Mexican border where they can bring in prostitutes and stuff like that. I don't know what was going on with all of that stuff. But Matt Drudge was told, everybody believes it was Scalia, strongly hinted he wouldn't say it, strongly hinted it was Scalia. Scalia turns up dead. Breitbart is dead.

And he knows that this crackdown on free speech is coming so who's he going to ally with is he going to ally with a trump for a little bit he did uh but then he could kind of see the handwriting on the wall there uh he's either going to lose his website by having it taken down and being the brunt of that attack or he's going to switch sides and start cheering for the other side. And I think that's exactly what he did. I don't, I think it's about money. And,

um, and I, I, you know, when I talked to him, I've said this before, you know, I thanked him for showing the picture of baby Samuel.

They got him kicked out of Fox news when he had his program there. He said, I just want to get out of my contract. And so, you know, but God can use that of whatever his motives were. Uh, they doesn't really, he didn't really care about a pro-life issue. He doesn't care about these other. So I don't think then, and then, and then as far as Alex goes, um, I think that he is most likely going to somehow find some donor who just sends him mysteriously $9 million and buys a thing or something.

Eventually, in four words, you share the same fate as Drudge Report, says PJ Media, a conservative site that anti-conservatives co-opted. No, I don't think so. I think it was co-opted a long long time ago by the right wing of the intelligence community and i'll just finish up with this one thing would be a trump assassin has ties to the cia says a former official i said this the first day when i came back it happened over the weekend it happened on a um um well no that's the other shooting in pennsylvania but um also said about that but about this um this this golfing i said that right away i said look at this this guy has been all over the world and he's been interviewed by the new york times also pushing

the ukraine war and everything i said how does a roofer get to do that a roofer from north carolina has a roofer from north carolina get a um actually pretty nice house in hawaii and he doesn't stay in hawaii instead he's going to ukraine and doing all these and holding court with the press and everything so it's got cia written all over it and uh ryan wesley ralphyear-old Democrat arrested last week after reportedly trying to assassinate Trump at the golf course, has ties to the CIA, according to a former U.S. State Department official. Last week, former State Department official and Foundation for Freedom Online

executive director Mike Benz shed some light on Ruth's mystique, saying he has links to the CIA. He said, you can almost spin the globe and find a place where there was paramilitary activity, and somehow Ryan Ruth was just waltzed his way through almost a dozen of them. And so, you know, when you look at the money, you look at the fact that he goes to Ukraine and he's trying to say, hey, I know all of these people from Afghanistan and everything coming in here. It's like, oh, wait a minute.

Afghanistan, Ukraine, this North Carolina roofer? He said he's got CIA written all over him. We lived in North Carolina and I knew guys that were in construction. None of them ever seemed to express any interest in the Ukraine. Yeah, or Afghanistan. They didn't know Afghanistan terrorists, right? They didn't know people on Afghan fighters and ISIS. Yeah.

So, you know, if you're going to use CIA operatives and criminals like Steve Pchenik, who the Italian government said in Operation gladio was sent by kissinger and uh executed told the terrorists to execute aldo mora and of course the terrorist actually worked for nato right so-called communist terrorists actually worked for nato so the whole thing was nato operation kissinger steve pachinik nato they kidnapped and killed um the italian prime minister as part of their reign of terror. Anyway, ever since Crimea joined the Russian Federation in 2014, Benz explained the CIA began working to arm the Kiev government to take Western Ukraine back from Russia.

Part of this capacity building a mission involved importing fighters, including ISIS and al Qaeda soldiers to bolster ukraine's forces well um again the um you know we go back and talk about how the cia engineered the coup that caused crimea to say we want to go to russia uh but he says he has an entire website dedicated this this supposed um roofer right has an entire website dedicated to military recruiting of afghani pakistani and iranian militants to come to ukraine he explicitly tells him multiple times on his website in big all caps bold lettering as well as in hundreds of facebook posts quote do not tell your local embassy that you're coming to ukraine don't say

anything just send me your passport information and take're coming to Ukraine. Don't say anything. Just send me your passport information and take a plane to Ukraine or take a plane to Poland and ride a bus into Ukraine. He says what Ryan Ruth was doing was that he was collecting thousands, literally thousands of passports of terrorists in foreign countries and CIA war zones and telling them not to tell their local embassy that they're traveling, but instead to go directly through him as a middleman because he can secure them visas. I mean, that part of all of this, how suspicious is that? And of course, he could just be doing that as a front man for the CIA. Maybe they just wanted to get the passports for these terrorists, right? Maybe it really wasn't about sending them to Ukraine. Who knows what the motivations of the CIA are at any given point.

But you could look at this and you could tell right away. Can you tell right away when you got CIA known operatives spreading unbelievable lies that created January the 6 6th movement and you get millions of dollars sent to you anonymously and you got family in the CIA can you tell a controlled opposition CIA guy like Alex Jones or am I being too harsh no another odd fact about Ruth is that although he had a criminal record, boasting at least 74 arrests and 100 charges, he didn't spend a day in jail prior to his alleged attempted assassination of Trump. Yeah, neither did Alex for January the 6th. I wonder if Ryan Ruth has got some CIA family members like Alex. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we're going to be right back with Tony Arterman.

Stay with us. We'll be right back. And I'll get to your comments after we have Tony on. I got a lot of people who have commented about this and we'll get back to those comments when we come back. Stay with us. We'll be right back. ¶¶ Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. All right, welcome back, and joining us now is Tony Ardaban of Wise Wolf Gold. And now, The David Knight Show. and um but you can you can get gold silver large or small amounts and of course if you want to gradually accumulate things on a regular basis on a monthly basis set up your budget you can pick a

level that you want to contribute each month and if you're part of the wolf pack the buying club you get the advantage of a group buy as if you're buying a larger quantity that type of thing so take a look at that at wise wolf gold and thank you for joining us tony always great to have you on uh one one of the things that you always talked about you said what's going to be difficult is going to be um as this mania kicks off it's going to be difficult to find product and we're seeing that from goldman sachs their commodity desk is saying that the buying has been relentless and silver is starting to move too are you seeing that absolutely and uh you're uh I appreciate you bringing that up because I've been

talking about that for a long time it's not something that made the headlines in the financial networks about the lack of actual physical supply of precious metals because of the ETFs and as a matter of fact I was reading an article from Reuters major banks are predicting this this is the beginning of the bull run for uh for gold and it's not the end it's not the bubble like they're looking for higher prices into 3 000 and so on and for gold and they were saying that one of the things that they're counting is not just Central Bank buying that we've talked about but the inflows now of ETFs yes so what they're doing they're putting clients into ETFs but again that's not physical gold you

that's an iou if you cash out in an exchange traded fund they don't send you precious metals they send you Fiat currency so it's it is driving the price I mean because there is a massive amount of inflows now after that rate cut uh but what i found especially being a dealer in uh in two different states is the supply is not what it was uh when i started this business um not anywhere near it it's the selection the timing now we do have uh i think the selection is is decent right. It has somewhat stabilized, but if anybody of any substance came along and started buying up physical silver, for example, like the lady that was a billionaire to fill the order, and it took six weeks for delivery. So it wasn't instantaneous, and they had to source it from several other brokers. So, again, I'm seeing the same thing here on the ground just in supply. And, of course, silver is up 40% in terms of dollars this year.

Wow. So there's a lot going on in the metals market today. Wow. And gold as well, you know, really going up about that amount, I think, from last September. I think last September was around like nineteen hundred or something like that. But, you know, you're talking about the ETFs and paper gold. And that was a thing that was the eye opener for me. They had pretty much tracked, you know, with along with each other as gold would go up or down.

So would the paper gold until 2022. And I talked about this yesterday. And at 2022, what happened is gold starts going up and the ETFs start going down. I did not track. And so that's what they're looking at. They said, look at this. It kind of decouples. And when I saw that decoupling, I thought, why is that?

And then I realized what the ETFs were. It's just an iou as you point out for what is supposedly gold that is supposedly being held on the shanghai gold exchange and it's like oh wait a minute this is looking too much like the uh securitized mortgages of the mid-2000s uh i want to get out of the paper gold and paper silver stuff but uh now you know they could wind up being a buyer who knows but they've used that to manipulate the price and what he was saying was a couple of different articles they were saying uh the central banks have been the ones that have been boosting this up as you and i talk about every week the central bank buying all

the central banks are buying gold except for the United States. And they're not buying any more gold because, again, it's an opposition to the dollar, as you've pointed out many times. But that has been driving it along with a little bit more retail trade in India and places like that. But this one guy said, hey, look, I'm not getting anybody. I'm not getting any taxi drivers or Uber drivers telling me, hey, you need to buy gold or silver. So it hasn't hit the retail area yet, right? And even though you get stock tips all the time and you should get this stock and you should get that, nobody's talking about gold or silver. He said, when that happens, it's going to explode. And he thought that would happen when it got to like $3,000.

And we're getting there pretty quickly, aren't we? Well, yeah. And it's interesting because in my business, I've been tracking this just on a personal level. Like when I started out in San Antonio, I noticed when the price goes up, I get more customers. And when I moved the shop to Branson into the 2020s, I saw the same thing. It's just been strange. you really can't even track these buying patterns now i i don't i can't count on the same kind of uh volume that i used to uh for this for the reasons i used to get the volume and you're absolutely right when when the when

regular people when your taxi drivers are just anybody right heavy you talking about buying some gold i think about buying some silver. It's too late. If you're already plugged in or you're a member of Wolfpack and you've been following us for a while, you're like part of the 1%. There's not a lot. That's not a lot of people. I mean, I have great customers and I'm thankful for the people that do come in. But it's not, you know, your standard retail location with a line out the door. That's not how any of this really works.

When that does happen, there won't be supply. I mean, it'll, it'll, the price will, it'll be price shock. Like we've never seen before. And we're on the edge of that. I really believe we're on the edge of a price shock when it comes to gold because the world's de-dollarizing. And like you and I were saying off air, we're just surprised it's happening as fast as it is.

I mean, I'm usually very cautious to make predictions like, oh, it's going to be in six months. We're going to have such and such price or in two months or whatever is going to happen. And there's going to be a supply drain. But I really don't know anymore. Just the headlines continue to build up, especially with BRICS and these cross-border payments and these countries dumping the dollar holdings. The reserve asset of the U.S. dollar in central banks is the lowest it's ever been. It's continuing since 1944. It's declining. And we're just seeing the rapid de-dollarization, which is going to have a huge impact on the strength and purchasing power of the dollar and our own economy here at home.

And so all of this stuff is going to add up when people start running toward the door to get some precious metals or to hedge against inflation. I don't know that the supply is going to be there. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know who said that. It was, I think it was the Great Depression. It was some guy who said, you know, when he was getting stock tips from the shoeshine boy, from his barber, and from the guy driving the taxi and everything, he goes directly and sells and gets out of the market, you know? Maybe you remember who that was.

I couldn't remember who that was yesterday, and I forgot to look it up. But, yeah, that is the key thing it's going to hit some point which everybody's going to go whoa and you're going to see uh all the mainstream articles and talking about de-dollarization talking about the the deficit and the debt and all the rest of the stuff and it's going to be everybody's going to be uh running to the uh to wolfpack to try to get their gold and silver or to goldman sachs or whatever and they're not going to the, uh, to Wolfpack to try to get their gold and silver or to Goldman Sachs or whatever, and they're not going to have it. Uh, so that's, that's a key thing, you know, now is, is still, it's still time, uh, for people to be able to get in and look, all the fundamentals

are still there. It's just a question of when it's going to happen. Like Gerald Slinty says all the time, he says, well, I don't make predictions. I look at trends. And so it's a given that this is going to happen when it's going to exactly happen i don't know a lot of people are saying 2700 uh by uh you know the beginning of the year or whatever i i i don't know it could happen sooner you know and and so who knows you got these psychological barriers every time that it goes over uh you know um another goes from 26 to 27 or whatever that's our 25 to 26. That is a bit of a psychological barrier. People have to get used to that before people buy more, you know.

So there's that aspect of it. But if there's some kind of shock that goes to the system, it'll happen incredibly fast. And then I think once it gets to a certain point, and I really do think that, you know, if you start to turn over, it's like turning over the odometer on your car. You all sit there and watch when it goes from 99,999 to 100,000 and uh you tell all the kids watch this you know but uh when something like that happens and it all the digits flip and it goes to 3,000 i think that's going to be something that's going to wake everybody up

well if you look at the global markets and i I've said this before, gold has a $16 trillion market cap, $16 trillion or so, in the face of hundreds of trillions in supposed assets around the globe, whether that traffic in they traffic in fake i mean we're a washing fiat currency fake fake currency with no backing uh you know full faith and credit of whatever government uh and when they inflate their way out of problems that's what we're doing right now just you know right on the eve of an election we cut the interest rate by 50 basis points which is extremely aggressive given the fact that they've been raising interest rates faster than any time in history so it's a a 180 course correction at a you know 50 basis points and they're supposed to cut all the way down to a full uh point here by the end of the year so you know the markets are responding to that and not the way that you would think a lot of times when the stock market was proclaimed healthy or the economy was healthy gold just goes down like i know i've been in this business it doesn't correlate this way but now you're seeing the

exact opposite and the inflows and the etfs are up the central bank gold buying is up i think just get just the general mood out there you see the with bitcoin the same thing with bitcoin people it's a speculative asset but it's finite finite. And I think that's another reason the inflows of the ETFs have been strong there and individual buying and adoption is up there in Bitcoin as well. It's because we're in the throes of a system change. And this we're 80 years on from Breton Woods. And this is a sacral room, right? This is the, what the Romans called. And this is the fourth turning. You mentioned it all the time 80 to 100 years and we're right at 80 years since bretton woods uh new hampshire 1944 the new economic world order with imf the world bank gold at 35 an ounce

uh we're inside of an experiment too that you know since 1971 uh fiat currency is what we have and we this we used to have a dollar as good as gold, but now you can be your own bank. Thanks to Gerald Ford in 1974, executive order overturning FDR, you can be your own bank and we're outside of that system. So they're going to continue to inflate. They're going to continue to pay for the welfare warfare state. I think I kind of chuckle sometimes when people ask me about, well, are we going to be on a gold standard again? I'm like, well, I don't know. I am. I'm on a gold. You should be on a gold standard. I'm on a gold. Everybody should be on a gold. Whatever the government does, let them do. So I really think that so many paradigms are going

to change. And it looks like david uh and neither one of us are alarmist but it's happening faster than either one of us thought i mean if you'd have told me at the beginning of the year hey gold's going to be up 570 an ounce no problem by september i thought that's a i think that's a a big bit of a leap i'm not going to go that far i wouldn't have gone it that far yeah um i Um, I'm usually not that way. I'm like, well, you, cause it's, it's been pretty steady, you know, and we remember going back to 2020, um, it, it, it was what 2000 and August 6th, it broke like $2,010 or $2,050. And, uh, you know, and then came back down and fell below $1,900. And when you and I were talking not just a year and a half ago, gold at $1,600 an ounce. Yeah.

Now we're at $2,600 and climbing. Futures, by the way, are pegged at $2,700. So really unprecedented moves in the metals markets. Oh, yeah. Yeah. As you point out, we're at a fourth turning. When you go back and you look at the characteristic uh the characteristic of fourth turnings as strauss and how pointed out is that there's always a major economic unrest and usually war right and so you

go back and look at the previous one world war ii and the great depression and then we've been under the new worldwide financial system that was created in the wake of that now for about 80 years. And so that's what they're looking at. They all know that the financial system is going to be reset. They've got their ideas of what they would like to do. And, of course, there's a limited amount that we can do about that. We can protest it. And, of course, in Canada, you've got Mark Carney, one of the biggest banker insiders ever.

I mean, he's connected to everything. But as I pointed out yesterday, World Economic Forum and the big bankers, Goldman Sachs and the Rockefellers, I think, maybe the Rothschilds. Anyway, he was the head of the Bank of Canada and then goes to the Bank of England. He was the first person who was not British who was head of the Bank of England. This guy is the ultimate insider. And he's saying, well, you know, we're not going to do the CBDC anymore. I don't think you can believe that. I think that's going to be a part of the new financial system.

And that's even beyond all of the other stuff that would be pushing gold, all the financial issues. There's that control issue that's there. Because in this fourth turning, we not only have the concern about a world war, but we also have a kind of financial turning like what was happening with the Civil War, both here and in Italy and in many other places. The Industrial Revolution was created. The nation states were created. Now we've got a technocracy revolution that is coming, as well as a global state that is coming.

That's what they're trying to establish, and that's what this financial system is going to be a part of. So, yeah, you're right. We've got to have our own personal gold standard to be outside of that, as much as we can do. Yeah, that's really the only thing that explains our current situation. If you look at the powers that be not trying to save the current system, they're certainly not trying to prop it up for any long-term usage. It looks like golden parachutes all around, David. I mean, they didn't save the petrodollar.

They're printing into oblivion. There is no fiscal sanity or responsibility. there's no fiscal hawks anymore nobody talks about the deficit it just seems to be you know the elephant in the room that everybody ignores and that's the only thing i can think the only thing that explains this is that they know at least the top upper echelon knows that there will be a new system introduced and the backbone of that system will be a control system introduced and the backbone of that system will be a control grid the central bank digital currency which is what they want i mean if you look at whether you know davos world economic forum they were crowing about 97 of countries on board with the cbdc or have some sort of plan for that and then

the bank of international settlements uh figuring out their you know uh system to distribute and the collection house and all that stuff um and i just i think that what's what we're watching happen is the the rolling out of central bank digital currency and the plans for that uh luckily i see so much decentralization and uh attitude of adopting things that, you know, like gold and silver or Bitcoin or crypto in general. I see a lot of that, the attitude. And maybe it's just my wheelhouse and what I study and all the people that I follow. But I've never before. And I've been in this game for a while.

The energy, the intellect is all on the side of the people with, with the mindset of freedom and decentralization that the, the overlords of finance, the fiat overlords, they really don't have a lot of heft. I was reading the other day, there's like 400 PhDs that work at the federal reserve. And I thought something about, you know, the, the there's gotta be a joke in there about the collection of brain power, kind of like a JFK talked about with the Nobel laureates that came to the white house. And, you know, you said this is the most, uh, uh, collection of brain power and, and,

and, uh, intellect since Thomas Jefferson dined alone, there's gotta be some kind of a joke there in that, in that line of logic about all these supposed smart people all the smart set and look at the damage that they've done it's it's absolutely unforgivable it's criminal oh yeah yeah uh yeah and uh and of course you get back to the thing is it intentional is it malicious or is it incompetence and i think yes i think it's both let's hope it's all they're malicious let's hope that they're incompetent as well that's that's where i hope is and i i thought it was funny you know when you i laughed and he said golden parachutes because i thought you know nobody ever grabs a fiat parachute i gotta i gotta use that nobody nobody ever jumps out of a plane with a piece of paper

it's because they say so it inflates because they say we say it will and it doesn't exactly right i got a question here from a listener dg8 uh for he says can you ask tony if cryptocurrency has played a role in strangely lowering gold and silver prices yes i believe if there was no such thing as Bitcoin, then gold would be way over $3,000. I think it has had a role in somewhat of the, it hasn't stalled gold. I think it's just, and they sometimes compliment each other. There's room for both folks. I mean, when you hear people say there's an unlimited supply of gold or something no there's not it's like the more steel is poured in one hour than all the gold has ever been mined in history it's a

finite finite even if you you know they say well there's not that gold could be on asteroids or whatever you know i mean just these hypothetical things like there's a there's a limited supply of gold and silver they're very hard to get. They're very hard. It takes a lot of resources to refine them and all the rest. But gold and I think crypto have, especially since the adoption of Bitcoin, the good thing about Bitcoin is that it's taken a lot of people and the younger generation who might not have gotten into gold or silver or learned about fiat currency or the Federal Reserve, they learned about it through Bitcoin, through what you call orange pilling, which I think is great because I have Bitcoin too and I deal in it. But I do think that that's a

good question. I do think that the rise of cryptocurrency has somewhat taken off a little bit of the monetary gain of of precious metals but there's there's tons of room out there like i said you know silver's got a 1.4 trillion dollar market cap bitcoin has a 1.2 trillion market cap um and there's hundreds of trillions in supposed wealth around the world so i'm we got a long way to go for real assets well i just just the fact that bitcoin talks about it in terms of mining right using that paradigm and so that helped to get people to understand the difference between uh something that has intrinsic value that is real money or whatever like gold uh and that you've got to mine it what they're saying is that the intrinsic value of the

cryptocurrency is the process of uh you know doing the calculations for the transactions they call that mining and but the the bottom line is that it's based on work and uh what the governments are trying to do with cbdc is to change it over from instead of proof of work which would limit it they're trying to change it over to proof of um what was a mistake yeah thank you uh basically proof of authority right it's worth this because i say so and so what they were trying to do was establish that and say you know you're limited in these physical assets because you got to mine it we're going to limit this because you got to work to get it and and so that's where they came with

that paradigm and that's very useful because it educated the younger generation, I think, that has gotten into crypto more than most. It helped educate them about fiat currency and why you don't like that. I think what's going to happen is, you know, most of the people, when I was talking to Aaron Day, he said the older generation values privacy, but they don't like the technology. The younger generation likes the technology, but they don't like privacy, and they don't value privacy, right? And so perhaps Bitcoin has a role there for the younger generation, but also we need to understand that most of the assets are skewed towards the older generation. When they get scared, and they're not really paying that much attention for the most part right and so like we said before once it starts uh once everybody starts talking about it once mainstream media starts talking about gold and de-dollarization uh then the older generation is going to take the assets that they have more of

and they're going to start pouring it into gold i think it's that's when we're going to start seeing it there but of course you know the fact that people who don't trust fiat have a choice of where they can put it that has siphoned off a lot of uh a lot of wealth that would have gone into gold i think yeah yeah absolutely uh i guess you know when we talk about uh the asteroids i instead of um you know people used to say i'm waiting until my ship comes in. I guess it could be your spaceship comes in from the asteroid and bringing back all of the loot. Maybe that's why Elon Musk wants to go to the stars so badly. There's gold out there. Gold in them, there are stars.

There's gold in them, there are stars. Got to get out there. It's really. If you just take a look at the big picture here, we're going through a monetary reset. That's what the planet's doing right now. And the elites came out a long time ago and said, hey, this is what we're going to do. We call it a great reset. And that's a conspiracy theory.

No, they're resetting the monetary system. There's going to be winners and losers here, too, by the way, folks. There's going to be those who gain and there's going to be those who just really get caught flat-footed as i say all the time quoting our buckminster fuller people can't get out of the way of what they don't see coming you know people just think it's going to be like you know tomorrow's going to be like yesterday that's not how this works history's unfolding before us and uh it's the prices are an indicator of that i don't think we're just getting started these are these are i think uh and we'll see some dips there'll be some pullback in the precious metals markets but that's only because of sell

offs and things like that and people getting liquidity uh but we're on we're in a general trend here uh with the dollar in decline david that's that's what we're watching yeah that's that's it that's the trend we can't predict when it's going to happen but we can see that it is accelerating as we're laughing about it you know it's like this has happened a lot faster than i thought i find myself saying that all the time as i get older everything in life is coming at you faster but look we are at the you talk about a lifespan right you know that's the the fourth turning 70 or 80 years just like a lifespan. And when you get to the end of the lifespan of the system that we're in, each time, you know, things start to go pretty fast. They start to fall apart really fast, just like your body when you get to a certain age.

It starts to fall apart really quickly and starts to accelerate as it's about to die. And that's what this system is going to do as it's about to die. It's going to start accelerating its deconstruction, its decomposition or whatever. So it's about to die it's going to start accelerating its um uh deconstruction it's decomposition or whatever you know so it's it's a dying system uh and we can all see that it's a dying system the question is you know how how are you going this is a storm that's coming what are you going to do to protect for the storm that's that's the key thing well tell us a little bit about what's going on at uh wise wolf, other than trying to cover a thing, trying to get supply. Yeah.

That's the daily mission. I wake up every day. It's funny. You, we talked off airs. I don't know what day it is. Uh, I know it's Thursday. I got to, I'm going to talk to David on Thursday. I do my shows.

I have to remember that at least. Oh, you're right. Just getting supply. And, uh, we've been real fortunate to the two locations. I'll always help. Um, I'm like, I'm here in North Texas. I'll be back in the Ozarks next week and Branson, but just really just supplying Wolfpack.

I mean, we just continue to grow that. And thanks to your listeners, David and I dot gold folks go check that out and you can hit the tab, join Wolfpack start as little as $50 a month. And we're about to add, I can't really announce it yet or what it's going to be, but we're coming up with something called yet or what it's going to be, but we're coming

up with something called Wolf Picks and it's going to be on the wolfpack.gold site. And what we're doing is every day, we're going to set the price for an ounce of silver or an ounce of gold. Now you don't know what it's going to be. It could be a coin, could be a round, could be a bar. And I'm going to set that as the most competitive price I can. It's going to be like from noon to six, like every day. And then we're going to to stop it like every day at the end of the close of business i'll stop it when i can't lock a trade so you could check that out we'll have no fees on that as well um no no credit card fees we're just going to take a bank ach and then we're going to have uh blocks of 500 and a thousand uh for just for just gold or silver. And it's like first come first serve

best deal. You can lock that in all silver or all gold, uh, through Wolfpix at the, at the beginning of the day. And then we'll give you a detailed invoice and let, let us shop. And it could be anything that comes in. So it's just going to be from what we're buying and putting over the counter and then we build your invoice. So we're looking forward to that. That's great. So, so look out for the blue light there and uh the blue light special limited time each day you're gonna have a special that's gonna be there so people can can take a look at and again uh it is wise wolf gold and you can get there through david night dot gold let tony know that you're coming through us and you got a program that's following

immediately after this one noon eastern time 11 central time tell everybody where they can find your program and what's coming out yeah please please come over uh we'll be over uh on rockfin on the america unplugged channel my uh my ex at at tony arterburn i'll be broadcasting there and rumble america unplugged channel uh arterburn radio transmission we'll uh we'll have some fun go Go, go join the stream. That's great. And I got another comment here. Actually, this is a thank you on rumble from atomic dog.

He said, David, thanks to Tony for insisting silver was going to be a solid investment. I increased my position last month and it has paid off. Very good. Yeah, I know. Yeah.

You saw that coming and you called it. And so good. I'm glad that worked out for you. Atomic. When you're up there, when you're up there, when the market's up, you saw that coming and you called it. And so good. I'm glad that worked out for you, Tommy. When you're up, when the market's up, you look like a genius. And then when you have a sell-off and a correction, I don't look so great. But thank you so much for that. Well, we know what the long-term trend is going to be. That's the key thing.

And there's going to be a lot of noise up and down. It's not going to be, I don't think, as as much of a roller coaster ride as the bitcoin has been but um it's it's gonna vary you know it's gonna go around so it's not gonna be just always uh straight up and to the right you know all of this stuff jumps around and there's many things that affect it but we know what the fundamentals are we know what's going on with the deficit we know that the financial system it is at its natural end of life and these people have got grand designs of what they want to build and what they want to build is going to be very um tyrannical we don't want to have that dominating us we want to have something that is going to be outside of that so for all those reasons um have some wealth insurance and have some tyranny

insurance as well uh i don't think that these people like i said yesterday i don't believe them for a moment uh that canada is going to pull back from the cbdc i think that's just a head fake before an election that's all that's happening with that this is that's the long-term plan they're in lockstep with the world economic forum and all the rest of these things i mean look at this picture christia freeland this year i'm looking at it while i got the article pulled up she looks just like herman munster's wife i mean she she looks like lily munster in black and white i mean it it truly is amazing and except that lily munster was nice i you know right she had life in christ christy or freeland is not nice uh so we're going to take a quick break thank you so much tony for supporting the program

and uh for all that you do and it is um it's great to have somebody uh that we can trust i would hate to have to be buying my gold and silver from goldman sachs so it's great to have you there thank you so much we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back folks Thank you. you're listening to The David Knight Show. Well, before we get back to the news here, and we've got a lot of very light news about Lala Harris. We'll have a few lulls about Lala because it's really crazy what she's saying. And she got called out on it.

She made the mistake. She finally did a one-on-one interview with an honest journalist. It is pretty amazing. But before we get to that and have some laughs, I just want to remind you, I mentioned at the very beginning of the program, Jason Barker, a prayer request for his grandson. And I want to thank all you for the prayers for my son. I got this last night,

and I told him that I would mention it today. He said, please do. He said, I know Whistler needs all the prayers he can get right now, but we also desperately need some tonight. My younger stepdaughter had her third child today, my fifth grandbaby. She was overdue, and they ended up inducing labor. She had the baby just fine, my fifth grandbaby. She was overdue and they ended up

inducing labor. She had the baby just fine, but he soon started having trouble breathing. He was flown to Mercy Hospital in St. Louis where he's struggling. They're about to put in a tracheotomy and he is in really bad shape. His name is Baby Liam. Can you please pray for God to place his healing hand on him and to comfort his mother? And so we have been praying for Tony. I would like to please pray for him yourself. And he says, I'll continue to keep Whistler, Travis, all night filming my prayers. It's times like this that we need each other more than ever. This is why I think you know, God, these things happen in our life so that we see God working in our life and so that we can pray for each other and lift each other up to him.

And, you know, if you need to, you look at this and you wonder about this. It was an excellent book. You have, Lee strobel did a book called the case for christ and and i thought an even better book that he did because i'd seen you know the the arguments that he made the you know the he addressed uh issues and things that skeptics would have um and i also have had on the show a couple of times a guy who wrote cold case christianity excellent book as well for skeptics a guy who was a cold case detective and he was not a believer and he read the bible because his wife became a christian same type of thing i believe

that happened to lee strobel and he applied the same uh types of things you want a cold case uh you've got some written testimony that was taken some written evidence that was taken at the time but now pretty much uh everybody is dead in a cold case you might have some people that you could go back and re-interrogate but you know the evidence is cold most of the people witnesses and things like that are dead so you go back and re-interrogate, but you know, the evidence is cold. Most of the people, witnesses and things like that are dead. So you go back and you look at the evidence. He said, applying those same standards to what he found in the New Testament, it was, it convinced him, absolutely convinced him. But of course we know that it is, and he understands as well, that it is God who ultimately convinces us and opens our mind to this.

But we see this type of thing happening so that we can see God working in our lives. And I was starting to say that Lee Strobel did a book, The Case for Miracles. And so he went out and he talked to people who were skeptics. He talked to people who had done scientific studies about it. Let's have this group over here pray about something. Another group will have a control group do it like a scientific experiment and things like that. And what he found was that more than any other segment of the population, doctors and medical staff believed in miracles more than anybody else because they had seen this answered so many times.

Now, it is always a situation where sometimes God's answer is no to what we want. And there will come a time where all of us will die. But in the interim, it is great for us to pray for each other so that we can see God's work. And I've seen that so many times in my life. That's why I kept telling people, look at the autobiography of George Mueller and his diary. Truly an amazing life of faith that he lived. And Jason says, well, I'm already thanking God for the miracle that he will provide.

And if the worst happens, then I will take comfort in the fact that baby Liam will be in paradise with our Lord. Absolutely true. And that in and of itself is a miracle, isn't it? A miracle that God would save sinners like us. This was sent to me by a listener. I won't get into a lot of details, but basically he was just asking me, he said, I'm not a religious man, but I hear you weaving Christianity into what you're talking about. It made me want to buy a Bible and investigate it. And so I told him, I said, well, I didn't tell him that, but I'll just say to people out there,

I've always believed that the best translation is going to be the one that you read. And so if there is something that really clicks with you, and you can look at different Bible translations at BibleG.com. Uh, I think, uh, in terms of, uh, clarity and, uh, clearness and modern language, I think, uh, new living translation is good. If you want to get more detailed in your understanding of things, uh, you can look at the Bible gateway and you can see why, why does one, um, why does one translation use this word or that phrase and

the other one uses something different but it really you know you can get more clarity but you can still see the picture the analogy that i've heard somebody use is that the bible is like a hologram you know you can uh break off pieces of the hologram. You'll still get the image. It may not be as clear, but you're still going to get that image. And I think that's true. I think that's true of any of these translations. We had my mother-in-law is Catholic, and we had a neighborhood Bible study that we did. We got her to come, and she was really reluctant. She said, I don't know.

I have a completely different bible so we'll just bring along and read along with us as we're reading and um you know she had the catholic um do a reams bible which is an english translation of a latin translation of the greek and hebrew so it's two levels direct but she said well it's basically the same thing you know she's looking at it and i think you'll find that if you look at the bible gateway um that even though this is a copy of a copy essentially a translation of a translation it was still the difference in the catholic bible and the protestant bibles are the what it's called the apocrypha, the books in between Malachi and Matthew,

between what we call the Old Testament and the New Testament, that inner period. They've got some books there that they put in. But you're going to understand, if you read the Bible, you're going to understand who Christ is, and you're going to understand his importance to us, what he did for us. You're going to see that. You're going to see that. You're going to see that in any Bible that you look. And if you want to look to, you know, same resources that I mentioned before, if you've got concerns about particular things, skeptics have brought up, or you've got concerns about

the Bible passage that's there, you can find that. But just make the Bible your key source. Let it speak for itself. You can always, not wrong to find out other things, but always don't treat them at the same level that you would. This was put up on Subscribestar. This is from DocuGarden who says, it was a great interview with Scott Schera the other day, who's our amazing grace

he mentioned that hospitals refusing to discharge patients and holding them hostage when i heard that i thought of emin bundy i remember you interviewed him and he had some kind of a group or posse around his area to fight back against stuff like the medical kidnapping if i remember right his group was successful a couple of times, standing up to hospitals and demands that they release the persons being medically kidnapped. At the time of the interview, he was starting this group. And yeah, the group was called People's Rights. It was back in 2020 as all the lockdown stuff was happening. I signed up in our area, but I never heard anything back from anybody.

It was not really active. I thought it was a great idea. It's just that you have to have a certain critical mass in idaho where he did have a critical mass they were able to help someone who was you know again i think it was around the birth of a baby and they were giving him a hard time because of the vaccines and the mask or something like that and so they stood up to that but but then they actually, the officials came back and charged him and charged others and they trumped up the charges

on all this stuff. So I've not heard from him for quite some time. He did put in a candidacy to run for governor. And last time I talked to him, he was flirting with that idea. And I said, well, if you decide to run,

let me know. I never heard back from him. But I did see that he was running, but I figured, well, he doesn't necessarily want back from him. So, but I did see that he was running, but I figured, well, he doesn't necessarily want to come on the program. So that's fine. Uh,

but I don't really know what's going on with, uh, Ammon. And I thought it was a great idea. The, the issue with the people's rights was this supposed to be a network of people. And if somebody had an issue where they were being attacked or there's

medical kidnapping or something like that, you would, um, send a call out and this network of people would show up to film stuff. The film stuff, because it's the light of truth about what is happening that is one of our best disinfectants of these tyrants that is out there. And this is from For the Love of the Road. And thank you. Love of the Road is a really key supporter of this program.

And he said he was just an Amish country and made a distribution there and made him wonder what the update is about Amos Miller. And he said, I didn't realize. And so I haven't done an update on that. I need to look into that and find out what's going on. I interviewed a guy who was right in that area, and he was one of the key reporters about that. He was independent media who was right on the spot. I need to contact him and find out what's going on with Amos Miller. Thomas Massey has talked about

that. Frank Nicely, along with Thomas Massey, talking about the prime act that Massey has talked about that. Frank Nicely, along with Thomas Massey, talking about the Prime Act that Massey has sponsored in Congress. And Frank Nicely was trying to get that in the state legislature here to say that if you own Cal, that the U.S. Department of Agriculture can't stop this. And, of course, the big problem that Amos Miller had was the Pennsylvania the pennsylvania department of agriculture that was really where this was coming down and uh so you know again

being supported by the u.s department of agriculture and um ryan also says um uh i didn't realize that it was so bad that whistler has been bedridden. Yes, it is. It is that bad. He can only walk a short distance, and he starts to get into pain in his hips and other things. And we're very concerned because this floxin poisoning from the antibiotic, the fluoride antibiotic, is something that attacks your tendons. And a lot of people have had ruptured tendons. But he's in a lot of pain,

even if he's just lying down from that. So we're trying. We've had a lot of people have sent us a lot of suggestions. We appreciate that. We're trying the detox, things that have been, suggestions that have been there, and charcoal and other things,

and castor oil. We're getting infusions. We're trying to do what we can. But the key thing again is prayer and so we really do appreciate that well we're going to oh one more thing here this is sent as an email from handy this morning and let me let me get to this before we move on he said i'm working tonight i just had an encounter that i want to share before the details get foggy in my mind earlier we were dispatched to a sick person call.

When we arrived, we went through the open garage, and on the way into her house, I noticed two surgical masks swept into the corner of her garage. I pointed that out to my partner. I told him, I bet this one took the vaccine. What we found was an adult female complaining about extreme weakness. She said she'd been too weak to even sit up in bed or to care for herself in any way for the last seven days. But her condition has been progressing since late fall of 2022, she said. She says her husband has been caring for her. Upon further questioning, I found that her weakness was due to rapid progression of Parkinson's disease that did not respond to medications

according to her doctor. She told me that her doctor hasn't really given her any hope for recovery or even slowing the progression of her neurologic disease. On the way to the hospital, I asked if she had any prior medical history, which she denied. She told me her doctor says she's been, quote, disgustingly healthy, unquote. And she's never had to take any prescription medications before now. That's when I asked her if she took any of the COVID vaccines. She told me she'd taken several. I took a look at her vaccine card and he sent this to me, actually.

And this is her vaccine card. And you can see it. Pfizerizer pfizer pfizer pfizer four of them notice the last entry pfizer bivalent flu covid jab on 10 31 2022 just prior to the onset of her debilitating neurologic disease he says she's not the first that i have seen like this absolutely it's such a shame too and look um you know we don't ever want to blame people who've had this done anybody can be deceived we've been deceived in our family uh over the antibiotic thing and you know we don't want to be the smoke was well i knew better it's your own fault because you take it you know like laura loomer right uh it's not your fault if you're poisoned it's not your fault if you're

lied to it's not your fault if you're gas lit i mean would we say that to a child well it's your fault that you had bottom surgery and you had puberty blockers and all this other stuff. No, it's not their fault. You know, they were lied to. And, of course, you can say, well, we should have known better. Look, you can always go back on all that. You can always say, you know, well, I was in a car accident. If only I had taken off a little bit sooner or later or whatever.

You can always, but no no it's it's not that these people who are doing this know what they're doing and they're poisoning people we know it they know it they need to know that we know it we need to say to not just to Francis Collins, but to Trump and to Biden, to the Republican congressmen and senators, as well as the Democrats, you need to have a Nuremberg 2.0. But we know that's not coming. We know that's not coming.

We need to put the fear of God in them. Because something much worse than Nuremberg 2.0 is coming up. And again, there's forgiveness if they think they need forgiveness. But of course, people like Trump doesn't think he needs forgiveness for anything. What a dangerous position to be in. We're going to, well, before we take a break, let me, I've got some comments here on Rumble. DG8, thank you for the tip, says, Alex and Trump, lure you in with the real truth and false promises and then betray you.

Controlled opposition at its finest. Praying for your family's health and recovery. Thank you. On Rumble, don't frag me, bro. David, could you ask Goat Tree about how much the internet he thinks is dead? Also about the new debunk bot. Well, that's one I haven't heard of. I'll look up that as well.

On Rumble, Anon Amoose. Thank you for the tip. He says, I've been young and now I'm old, and yet I have not seen the righteous forsaken or his children begging for bread. Psalm 37. Psalm 37 has been a very important psalm for me. Not about what happened at Infowars, but about what happened when I said we were creditors in a bankruptcy case. That was a real trial.

And I don't mean a judicial trial. I mean a trial for us personally. And the thing I remember about Psalm 37, I actually did lyrics in a song about it because we talk about different words that you see in different translations the word fret was used three times in that i remember looking at that i thought that's not what and that's the only place that it's used and so that hebrew word for fret when you look it up it actually comes from a situation where you take uh you actually kindle a You start a fire and you keep pouring stuff on it, right? What a great visual image that is of fretting, what fretting is. It's like, do not fret. Do not fret when the wicked succeed.

That's the message of it, and it finishes with that. I've been young and old, but I've never seen the righteous forsaken or the children begging for bread, so don't fret. God is in control. And that's what we need to understand through all this stuff. We need to be clear and not look away at the things that are bad. We don't want to say, well, I don't even want to read the possible effects of these drugs that I'm dispensing because it just gets me too scared and depressed. Well, you should be scared and should be depressed and you should know about this.

And you should because forewarned is forearmed. But we don't want to get so afraid that we are paralyzed with fear. And we don't have to be paralyzed with fear. By the way, that's why I recommend the Blue Letter Bible for people. You take a look at the Bible verses like that, and it explains to you where these words like that particular word that's only used in that psalm, it's the only time that Hebrewrew word is used in in the bible um that's a wonderful picture

you wouldn't know that if you didn't look it up in the blue letter bible so we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back they're doing what in the place they named after me good thing i have the david knight show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors. Making sense common again. This is the David Knight Show. From Gard Goldsmith. Thank you, Gard. He says, God bless Whistler, Jason, Liam, and family.

Travis and all such fine people. Thank you, God, for our kinship. Yes, thank you. Thank you, Liam, and family, Travis, and all such fine people. Thank you, God, for our kinship. Yes, thank you. Thank you, Guard, for your friendship. And you've done so much. It truly is wonderful knowing Guard. He's a great guy. And you should tune into his show, Liberty Conspiracy.

Yes, yes. And we had Guard at Occupy Peace Rally in 2021. And, you know, a great place to go if you can go this weekend that's when gerald slenty is going to be having the occupy peace rally it's got a great lineup of speakers that are there and um so if you're anywhere in the area you can go and of course the guard was not in the area but he went from new hampshire all the way over to uh new york and it's great great seeing him there um let's talk a little bit about La La. We need some laughs here.

We need to lighten this up here. And again, if we go back and we look at people who are, you know, freaked out about the fact that Biden goes on with the view and said, you know, Trump is just like a bug and he'll smash him and everything. Well, you know, they're kind of freaked out about that. But, you know, the worst thing that Biden said was not that. That speech really doesn't harm Trump at all. But he really stuck the knife in Lala.

Biden also said that he delegated everything to Lala. He said from foreign policy to domestic policy. Whoa. And so that was also in the view and instead i see so many of these people that picked up on this thing oh look he insulted trump they called trump a bug and he said i'm gonna swat the bug no he stuck a he stuck a knife in her back the acknowledgement says breitbart they did pick this up uh at breitbart the acknowledgement is significant because it contradicts Harris's talking points. She's tried multiple times to distance herself from the Biden-Harris record.

You know, she's going to be unburdened by what has been. Or I guess you could kind of rephrase that and say, we're going to be unburdened by what has been. Oh, that has been. Joe Biden, that has been. We're going to be unburdened by the has been? Oh, that has been. Joe Biden, that has been. We're going to be unburdened by the has-been Joe. But now the has-been Joe is trying to burden her with legacy. He said, my approach is about new, or she said, rather, my approach is about new ideas, new policies that are directed at the current moment.

And also, to be very honest with you. You know, when anybody says that, well, I'm going to be honest with you. Why would you say that? Unless you're usually not honest with people. It always concerns me when Simon says, well, to be honest with you. Oh, what you just said, or other things that you're saying, you're not being honest with me. I also love how we're getting new ideas and new policies from a woman who's been in politics. What, how many, how many years, decades at this point? Why haven't you implemented any of these before? Come on. Or said anything about them. Because she just looked on Trump's paper. She kind of pulled them off of there. So to be very honest with you, she said,

my focus is very much in what we need to do over the next 10, 20 years to catch up on the 21st century. She isn't going to be there for 10 years, even if she won this election and the next. And she says, I'm obviously not Joe Biden. And, you know, I offer a new generation of leadership. Unburdened by that has been Joe. But when she went on The View, when Biden went on The View,

he appeared to blame Harris for the administration's failure to reduce inflation, for the failure to secure the border, and for responsibility to withdraw from Afghanistan. He says, as vice president, there wasn't a single thing that I did that she couldn't do. And so I was able to delegate her responsibility on everything from foreign policy to domestic policy you see um many people said when she was declared to be the border czar many people talked about how much jill biden jill hated la la and a lot of people said they have just tied this thing around her neck like a dead albatross. And I think they just did that again. They just reminded everybody of the albatross they put around her neck.

The one thing that she is detailed about, she doesn't really have very detailed policies as we're going to see here in a moment, but the one thing that she has a lot of detail about, not so much the economy, but her economy and her campaign is based around a single issue. She's talking about a hundred billion dollar manufacturing plan and other things like that, but it's really about abortion. That's where you'll find the details. And that's really where her economy is. But she had an interview. She said, well, $100 billion in new investments in manufacturing. She said this plan will cost approximately $100 billion and will be paid for by a portion of the proceeds of international tax reform, which seeks to prevent

a global race to the bottom and discourage inversions, outsourcing, or international tax strategies designed by corporations to avoid paying their fair share to the United States. And so everything about global, international, international, everything is globalist, right? And everything's about taxes. So she's right on, but she's really making her pitch to the World Economic Forum. And of course, she's got a plan. She says, well, you shouldn't have a plan.

We shouldn't have a centrally planned economy. She goes on to say, I'm a capitalist. I believe in free and fair markets. No, you don't. You're just talking about how you got a plan about investments in manufacturing. Government shouldn't be investing in manufacturing. As a matter of fact, if you say that you're about free markets, then that means that you don't have government investing in manufacturing or in businesses. They're not there to pick the winners and losers. They're not there to create some grand strategy.

You know, the communists have their five-year plans. Well, she's got a 10-year or 20-year plan, she says. That's the way these people always work. She's just a communist. Commie Lala. I don't understand how you can trust someone who repeatedly lies, says a person that was interviewed by NBC News in the suburbs of Pittsburgh. And I looked at that and thought, well, are they talking about Trump or Lala? They both continually lie.

I don't know who they're talking about. I think in this context, because it was NBC, I think this person is supposed to be talking about Trump, but that applies to anyone. And so we see the interview that she had with MSNBC's Stephanie rule. Stephanie rule calls her out for dodging the questions on how she's going to raise taxes.

Well, it's just going to be this global international thing and we're going to prevent a global race to the bottom by taxing everybody. Well, that takes us to the bottom, I think. Stephanie Ruhle says she doesn't answer the question. Yeah. And so I think she thought that she was going to have a very, very friendly interview because Stephanie Ruhle had been so critical of trump and um giving her excuses and then she gets there and all of a sudden she gets straight up

questions uh the liberal host had previously defended uh lala harris for avoiding questions and so lala is giving these answers about, she's got this whole thing figured out. It's all just a bunch of, I don't even like to use the term word cell. That's what other people do. This is the kind of speech that you see bureaucrats do when they get up and give each other,

when they get up on a podium and start talking to other bureaucrats or at a college or something. It's just meaningless, you know, multi-syllable words or whatever. But in this particular case, she's talking about, she wants to make the economy, I don't know, holistic or something. And assistance to state and local governments around transit dollars. And looking holistically at the connection between that and housing.

And looking holistically at the incentives we in the federal government can create for local and state governments to actually engage in planning in a holistic manner that includes prioritizing affordable housing. Today's word, folks, class, is holistic. You must use this at least three times in a 30 second clip um and uh you don't have to know what it means you don't have to define that i mean this is just petty fogging nonsense holistic holistic holistic and so with that kind of uh nonsense stephanie rule calls her out she doesn't answer the question around if the GOP is controlling the Senate, if she can't raise corporate taxes, where is she going to get the money from to expand the child's tax credit and do all the things she wants to do? And she says,

we just have to do it. And that's great. And that's a campaign promise. But the issue is, if it means we're just going to borrow again then what we're doing is we're just never addressing the deficit and back in the days when you were a proud republican debts and deficits mattered yeah they're going to matter again uh because they're exploding another trillion dollars every hundred days or whatever we don't have to worry about any of that stuff look lala is one of the big advocates of mmt modern monetary theory i call it magic money tree deficits don't matter and if inflation goes up all we do is we raise the taxes of people we don't like that's their economic plan it's utter nonsense it's even dumber than keynesian economics i mean at least in keynesiannesian economics, even though it was false, they tried to come up with mathematical formulas.

The people that are doing MMT don't even do math. So Rule said, so do you still go forward with those plans and do you borrow? She says, Lala says, well, but we're going to raise corporate taxes. Those are the people she doesn't like. I'm going to raise corporate taxes. He's those are the people she doesn't like. I'm going to raise their taxes. We're going to have to make sure that the biggest corporations and the billionaires pay their fair share. That's just it. It's about paying their fair share.

It's always tax policy based on envy. Right. And, and, and to tell you that you're not going to have to pay the taxes, that other person, that person that you don't like, they're the ones who are going to pay the taxes. Don't worry, we're not going to tax you.

And yet you are going to be the one they tax. So she said, as she pointed out, she said, if the GOP is controlling the Senate, if she can't raise corporate taxes, where's she going to get the money from? Well, she said, we just have to do it. And so she said, that's not an answer. But this is what Lala was also selling her. She kept referring to, you know, not just holistic, holistic, holistic, but we got the opportunity

economy. Yeah, the opportunity economy. Here's what she talks about. She doesn't define it, but here's what she says about it. The third pillar of our opportunity economy is leading the world in the industries of the future. And making sure America, not China, wins the competition for the 21st century. Yeah, we don't like the Chinese. There's a copy of that from Trump as well. One of the recurring themes in American history is that when we make an intentional effort to invest in our industrial strength, it leads to extraordinary prosperity and security.

Not only for years, but for generations. Think of Alexander Hamilton having the foresight to build manufacturing capabilities of our new nation. Think of Lincoln and the Transcontinental Railroad. Think of Eisenhower and the Interstate Highway System. Kennedy committing America to win the space race and spurring innovation across our society. Yeah.

Okay. So, yeah, we should do this because Lincoln and Hamilton did it. Can you find any more despicable characters? And then, of course, you know, we had the interstate system. Well, that was done for military purposes, you realize. And then we had the moon launch, the moon launch. Let's never forget the moon system. You believe that?

Anyway, just days ago, Stephanie Ruhle had argued that Harris didn't have to answer tough policy questions because she wasn't running for perfect. She's running against Trump. Uh-oh. But then it was so vague and vacuous that she talked about price control. Prices are still high. Yeah, I agree with you. You said you want to take this on by going after those who engage in price gouging. Yeah. But as somebody who supports free markets, who's a capitalist,

how do you go after price gouging without implementing price controls? Because once we get in this zone, people start to get worried and they say, I don't know what she stands for. So just to be very frank, I am going to apologize for going after companies and corporations that take advantage of the desperation of the American people. And as attorney general, I saw this happen in the midst of an emergency, whether it be an extreme weather event or even the pandemic, we saw it where those few companies, not the majority, not most, but those few companies that would take advantage of the desperation of people and jack up prices.

Yeah, I'm going to go after them. Yes, I'm going to go after them. And that is part of a much more comprehensive plan on what we can do to bring down the cost of living, including housing, including the everyday needs of the American people. She has absolutely no idea what the free market is about. Anybody that is going to do price controls, anybody that's going to say, well, you're gouging people on this stuff.

Look, if you're able to raise the price, guess what that's going to do? It's going to suck in more supplies in that area instead of rationing them because Lala is going to throw me in jail. I just won't sell it at all. And you exacerbate the problems by saying, I'm going to throw me in jail. I just won't sell it at all. And you exacerbate the problems by saying,

I'm going to invest. I'm going to control. I'm going to centrally plan. She doesn't. She's just a full-on communist. And, of course, she always prefaces these things by saying, well, to be honest with you, well, to be frank with you, to be frank with you, let me dodge and weave here. And to be honest with you, well, to be frank with you, to be frank with you, let me dodge and weave here.

And to be honest with you, I'm going to next lie to you. Now, what she is all about is she's got a hundred billion dollar plan for the economy. But the abortion industry's got a hundred million dollar plan for her. See, that's the way this stuff works. You they invest millions into a candidate and that candidate gives back these different industries billions uh so the abortion industry is pumping money into her campaign like mad 100 million dollars essentially planned parenthood think of it this way planned parenthood is lala is to lala as Miriam Adelson is to Trump. $100 million.

Both of them are good for $100 million. She's got one policy, and she is very specific about that policy. And she's passionate only about that policy. And she's so passionate and specific about it that dictator that she is, whenever she's passionate about something, whether it is abortion or gun control or whatever, she's going to do it by executive order. I'm going to dictate this. If she cares about it, she's going to dictate it.

So that's what she said. I'm going to eliminate the filibuster in the Senate so that we can pass a law to ban any restrictions on abortion anywhere, up to or past birth, right? And she's going to get rid of the filibuster. Well, wait a minute, says Manchin and Sinema, who are both running for re-election. You can't come after the filibuster. You can come after those kids.

You can rip the kids to shreds, but don't you dare rip the filibuster to shreds, which, by the way, is not even something that's in the Constitution. It's a good thing, I think, in general. I think we always have to have something that's going to be a check. We should make it difficult for government to do things, just as a rule of thumb otherwise if it's easy if it's quick if it's warp speed right we know what's going to come so it

should be difficult for these people to get things done so i support it but it's not in the constitution and it's not the filibuster is not more important than the babies except to joe manchin and the cinema and so because she's pushing that both of these people who support abortion but they don't like getting rid they don't like aborting the filibuster wow abort the baby but don't abort my senate process Senate process. Two pro-abortion senators turned on Lala over her call to end the filibuster to codify unrestricted abortion.

Shame on her, says Manchin, not for wanting to abort kids, which she supports, but for wanting to abort the filibuster. She knows the filibuster is the holy grail of democracy. Where was this guy when the Paris Climate Accord was self-ratified by Al Gore and by

Obama, and then when it was put back in by Biden. Where was Manchin about that? Yeah, sure, filibuster, fine. Don't you have a process for approving treaties that's actually in the Constitution? Shouldn't you care about that? No. He said filibuster is the only thing that keeps

us talking and working together. If she gets rid of that, then this would be the house on steroids. And then Sinema says, to state the supremely obvious, eliminating the filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade also enables a future Congress to ban all abortion nationwide. What an absolutely terrible, short-sighted idea. I absolutely agree with her.

She's a thousand percent right on this. Because I've said this about the pro-life people who want to do just the opposite. See, the pro-life people want to set a limit for abortions in Washington. They want to make it a federal issue. And Sinema is saying, if you make this a federal issue, then you understand when the other side gets in, then they're going to ban all abortions. I don't want to ban all abortions.

I do want to ban all abortions. But I think we have to do that at the state level because if we do it in Washington, first of all, anything that's important needs to be done at the state level. Let's not abdicate anything that's important to the federal government. It's too corrupt. It's just too corrupt. And first of all, secondly, it doesn't have the constitutional authority. What both of them should be saying as senators is that, well, if you want to codify Roe v. Wade, then you need to amend the Constitution to say that the federal government has the power to define when life begins. Because you don't have that. According to the 9th and 10th Amendment, anything that is not expressly delegated to the federal government remains the power of the states and of the people.

And they have overruled that. In the same way that when the Supreme Court decided they were going to define what marriage was, they overruled state constitutions and they overruled referenda that had been done across the country. Every state had rejected homosexual marriage. Even California had rejected it. So the Supreme Court overruled the power of the states and the powers of the people and usurped that in order to define what marriage is. They have no right, regardless of what you think about abortion and about marriage. The Tenth Amendment is the Tenth Amendment. And so whether you want to support or abandon or deny either one of these things,

you've got to change the Constitution first, or just throw the Constitution out. And that's a really dangerous thing, and that's been done over and over again for a very long time by all these people. And so change the Constitution or shut up. We don't even have this discussion until you change the Constitution and give yourself the constitutional power to make these determinations. But from a practical standpoint, Sinema is exactly right, and I agree with her 100%.

She is pro-abortion. I'm pro-life. But we need to understand that if you give that power to Congress, a future Congress is going to do exactly the opposite of what you want. And it is an absolutely terrible, short-sighted idea to put these things into the federal government. So I absolutely agree with her on the issue, on the constitutional aspects of that, but not on these other issues. Let's take a look at another issue, and that is, what does all this talk about nuclear power tell us

about where these people are headed you know we talk all the time we say a double standard it's two-faced or this or that they they talk about it in the uk they say we have a two-tier justice system you have one set of rules for these people over here a different set of rules for those right and certainly that is the case over and over again now we're seeing that there is a two-tier system or a you know hypocritical system here in terms of power and they really do want to have a two-tier system when it comes to electrical power because the electrical power is going to give them political power over us. That's what this climate MacGuffin thing is truly about. And yet we see everywhere that you have individuals like Ramondo.

I'm sorry, not Ramondo. Granholm, who's the energy secretary. She appeared on CNBC Tuesday. And Jennifer Granholm says that we need to have small modular nuclear reactors so we can power the AI data centers. They don't want you to have an SUV, but they want the AI data centers to have their own nuclear reactor. Their own Mr. Fusion. Back to the future. Where's Doc when you need him?

We're the professor or whatever. No, there is no Mr. Fusion. It's going to be quite a bit bigger than that, but they don't want us to have cars, but they do want us to have artificial intelligence big brother watching everything that we do telling us lies and stopping us from speaking the truth that's what artificial intelligence is designed to do and that's why you got to clear the decks we got to fast track this we got to warp speed it in you got the pennsylvania governor saying let's do that for three months. We're going to run this thing really through fast. All the electricity, folks, is going to go to the AI data center for Microsoft. Enough electricity to power 700,000 homes.

I wonder how many electric cars you could power with that kind of electricity. But that's not going to be on the grid. That's not going to be available to you. Because they don't want you to have cars. They don't want you to have even electric cars. That's not going to be available to you. Because they don't want you to have cars. They don't want you to have even electric cars. That's the whole point. The electric car is a lie.

It's a lie. The cake is a lie. The electric vehicle is a lie. It's all a lie. It's just an illusion. It's just to tag you along in this. The electric car, battery operated, off of the grid, that they have every intention of killing,

that they're in the process right now of killing. You got the EPA out there now treating these power stations as if they were a dirty car that needs to be regulated. They have absolutely no intention of us having any power. But they're going to clear the decks to get these nuclear reactors to all these data centers so jennifer granholm says um seems to acknowledge that small modular reactors we should just start calling them mr fusions um one technology that we've claimed will be the future of powering ai they're all but a full-on go for the future

she was asked about how data centers would be powered in the future. They asked her, they said, well, at the same time, we've been trying to obviously replace typical energy sources with renewables. Why? Let's call out that lie. Anyway, but we now have this incredible potential uptick and the need for power because of data centers and the growth of generative AI. We were talking about Three Mile Island.

I said, how do you see this coming? We're talking about that coming back online. How do you see this playing out? How is it going to mix out, given that our power needs could be 20% higher than right now in just a handful of years? Oh, it's going to be much more much much more than that as a matter of fact um it's goldman or bloomberg uh saying uh we're going to have 50 increase in power just for the ai and uh so she comes back with an astounding lie he says it's going to be 20 percent no all the

people who are actually looking at this saying it's going to be at least 50 percent just for the ai she says well the estimates are 15 percent higher not 20 percent higher but 15 percent higher this harvard educated lawyer who has obviously doesn't have anybody on her staff that can even do math or cares to look at the power requirements of this stuff which is the other day i was talking about the fact that both elon musk and the ceo of toyota were saying there's not enough there's not enough electricity on the grid for electric cars there just isn't both toyota and tesla both uh the guy's name is toyota and Musk. They're both saying there's not enough electricity for this. They don't plan on you having an electric vehicle that you can give electricity to. So that's not going to be a vehicle, is it?

But she says, oh, no, it's only going to be 15% higher as a result of both AI and electrifying the transportation sector. What a bold faced lie. I mean, she talks about electrifying the transportation sector. What a bold-faced lie. I mean, she talks about electrifying the transportation sector. She's talking about cars and trains. I don't know if she's talking about planes. Some idiots have been talking about that as well. Would you get on a plane that runs on a battery? It's worse than Boeing.

But, no, I mean, they're talking about planes. They're talking about trains. They're talking about semis. They're not just talking about passenger vehicles. This is your captain speaking. Just know that there's going to be a slight delay as we charge for the next 12 hours on the tarmac. Please remain in your seats. More like the next 12 days.

Oh, and by the way, no air conditioning. We're charging this thing, so you're just going just going to sweat it out on the tarmac uh so anyway um so she says no no it's only going to be 15 percent higher and that's for the ai data centers as well as the transportations what a lie she says they're committed they're telling us to bringing that power with them which is why they, the need for nuclear, small modular reactors, co-locating data centers with small reactors or partnerships. Yeah. She said, we got a ton of nuclear sites in this country that have been permitted for additional reactors that could be powering data centers as well.

We're working with those. Look, these are the people who are banning any kind of appliance or heating or air conditioning or stove or anything that isn't electric we're not even going to have electricity to cook our food but they're going to grease the skids for the ai data centers because we know how they're going to use them. Yeah, it was BlackRock. I couldn't remember if it was Bloomberg. It was BlackRock that says that AI is going to drive a 50% jump in Asian energy demand just by itself. Forget about the entire transportation sector.

Forget about all your home appliances and everything else. No, just AI alone. A 50% jump in demand for energy, says BlackRock. And so they're looking at this and how they can make money off of this. Every client we speak to is interested in investing in infrastructure, specifically energy transition and digital-related infrastructure. This is the big grift. This is the big wealth transfer for the energy transition.

This is what the un is talking about well we got to accelerate these sustainable development goals and so that means that everybody's going to have to spend trillions tens of trillions of dollars in order to pay for this stuff and then they're going to jack up your energy rates 10 to 20 times or more i'm not exaggerating with this stuff we've gone through the numbers with this 10 to 20 times more more. I'm not exaggerating with this stuff. We've gone through the numbers with this. 10 to 20 times more for your electricity, if you can get it. Scarcity, rationing. This is not only a product

of Marxist centrally planned controlled economies, but it's also how they rule. They rule through austerity and through dictates. People like Jennifer Granholm, people like Lala Harris, these people are as vain as they are insane, and they are as vain and insane as the gender transition people when they talk about our energy transition stuff.

They identify with wind and solar. But it's just part of their imagination. Don't believe it. They're just trying to gaslight us while they take away the gas that we light our stoves with. Meanwhile, in the UK, we have the Labour Party conference. Ed Miliband, is doubling down on his de-industrialization strategy, says Daily Skeptic. That's exactly right. The techno-feudalism is about

making sure that the poor are immobilized, that we are poor, that we're immobilized, that we're surveilled, that we're lied to. I guess we could say surveilled, propagandized, and censored. The SPC agenda. You know, it's not the SDG, Sustainable Development Goals, it's the SPC that they're really after. Well, we'll have more to talk about with this tomorrow.

As a matter of fact, there's an interesting story about what happened with crypto. When they banned it, everybody's rates went up. tomorrow as a matter of fact there's interesting story about what happened with crypto uh when they banned it everybody's in uh rates went up thanks for listening have a good day the common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common.

That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Thank you.