The David Knight Show - Thr 2May24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

Starting point is 00:00:00 At BetMGM, Ontario's best casino action is just a click away. Play thrilling games like Premium Blackjack Pro, the dazzling MGM Grand Emerald Knights, or try to score in Gretzky Gold Lucky Tap. It's all here at BetMGM. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly.

Starting point is 00:00:18 If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-531-2600 to speak to an advisor, free of charge. But MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Happiness. We all know what it feels like, but sometimes it doesn't come easy.

Starting point is 00:00:37 I'm Garvey Bailey, the host of Happy Enough, a new podcast from The Globe and Mail about our pursuit of happiness. We know people want to live more fulfilling and positive lives, but how do we actually do that? Is there a happiness code to crack? From our relationship with technology to whether money can really buy you happiness, we'll hear from both real people and experts to demystify this thing we're all searching for and hopefully find ways to be happy enough. You can find Happy Enough wherever you listen to podcasts. Using free speech to free minds.

Starting point is 00:01:43 You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 2nd of May, Year of Our Lord 2024. Well, today we are going to go back and take a look at more of the campus wars, which continue to go on, because it's very important for us to see what this is about. It's not about what it's about, actually. The thing that they put up there at the front it's not about that at all it's going to change a lot of things and perhaps it may be used for good it appears to be a lot of pushback that is coming forward with it we're also going to take a look at some of the vaccine stuff that is really starting to explode in other countries not here here we're too busy cheering

Starting point is 00:02:42 for trump or biden to care about the many millions of people that they killed. But in other countries, it's now being exposed. And we're going to have some updates on some of the confessions of AstraZeneca. Very interesting. We'll be right back. Well, as usual, Babylon Bee has some of the best commentary on this stuff. Headline, history repeats itself as communists run out of food at Columbia University. They are communists. That's the key thing people need to understand. This is Marxists that have been trained there for many, many years.

Starting point is 00:03:44 Interesting that nobody really cared until it became anti-Semitism. They could be anti-Americanism, but they didn't care until it became anti-Semitism. But they are, after all, commies, and they are now declaring what their true purpose is in many of these cases here. The commies at Columbia University, says Babylon Bee, lasted only about 12 hours before running out of food and pleading for humanitarian aid, setting a new record for the collapse of a communist food supply. Okay, time out on the Antifato revolution. We're out of pizza rolls, said one organizer. I'm going to go see if the people we just assaulted will send us some door dash another said man why didn't we take over the food court i'm so happy i haven't hungry i haven't had chipotle in almost eight hours now still i bet the people of gaza are inspired by our sacrifice yes here's the true story that they're parroting here at ucla they put out a request that was intercepted by a Fox News reporter.

Starting point is 00:04:47 They put out requests for vegan and gluten-free food. These are spoiled, pampered brats. They also said they wanted, do not send any bananas or nuts. Because they've gone bananas and they're full of nuts. They have more nuts there than they can handle. So don't send any more nuts to these nuts. The request list was obtained by Fox News' Bill Malugan, if I'm pronouncing his name correctly. It includes a variety of other supplies, including masks seals and skater helmets and of course

Starting point is 00:05:27 they love the n95 mask that has the mask of shame like the cone of shame that you give animals the mask of shame this outward humiliation and obeisance to the medical martial law. That's become a very effective disguise for people. If they want to rob banks or take over college campuses or something like that. So supposedly they're worried about the nuts and bananas. They are worried about other nuts and bananas that people might have allergies to. I'm somewhat allergic to Marxist college students. I think those kinds of nuts the guards also require those who enter the encampment to wear the mask the n95 mask and isn't that

Starting point is 00:06:15 interesting because you know they've set up checkpoints this is not about speech is it when you got checkpoints when you're taking over buildings, when you're busting into them, beating people up and throwing people around, and now they've had massive fights, they've got Chaz-like entrances. This is not about free speech. But here's the interesting thing. It's being treated by the Republican and Democrat supporters of Israel as if it was free speech, so they can take down our free speech.

Starting point is 00:06:48 Isn't that interesting? I find that to be very interesting. It is not about free speech at all. What these people are doing is not peacefully assembling, as the First Amendment says, to air their grievances. No, it's something completely different. So why are they making it about speech? Why are they criminalizing any criticism of Israel, the political entity even?

Starting point is 00:07:12 Why are they doing that? You and I both know why. Because they want to. They're looking for an excuse to censor us in every way they can. Every way that they can. For nearly a week, the pro-Palestinian activists have excluded members of the public and the press by force. It's not a free speech issue, and yet you got Mike Johnson out there. You know, they're coming up, though we got an anti-Semitism, anti-anti-Semitism act or

Starting point is 00:07:42 whatever they want to go on uh the protesters don't believe in free speech just like this the satanic temple doesn't believe in satan they're using these things you know they're using this what is what is the temple of satan set up these phony things like i was talking about yesterday why they do that, because they want to suppress free exercise of religion of other people. They're goading you into banning that so they can say, well, you banned our religious exercise of something that they have declared publicly that they don't believe. So now we can ban the free exercise of what you really do believe. So that's the purpose of the Satanic Temple.

Starting point is 00:08:28 The purpose of these protesters who have never believed in free speech. Look at what they've been doing on campus for years, purging anybody that comes that they don't agree with. No debates, you're racist, you're this, you're that. And so their purpose is perhaps the purpose of Soros, who has been pushing all this censorship and stuff as well. Perhaps the purpose is really to shut down free speech, just like the purpose of the satanic temple is to shut down the free exercise of religion.

Starting point is 00:09:00 It's never about what it's about, is it? Not with these people. There's always a hidden agenda, and it doesn't take too long for that hidden agenda to rise to the top. So the chaos is actually benefiting both Netanyahu and Mike Johnson because it is distracting people from what they're doing. You look at Mike Johnson. Again, I said virtue signaling, going to Colombia so they can attack him and he can look strong,

Starting point is 00:09:35 even though he's incredibly weak and bought out. He goes there like he's got a backbone, which he doesn't. And so this is about their political agendas. Nobody's paying attention to what netanyahu is doing now uh it's all about these marxist revolutionaries it's exactly the opposite of what they say they want to accomplish they have taken away attention from the cause they say they oppose by their action. But the net result of this will be attacking our basic liberties and the bill of rights. Now, CBS is ignoring the major national security threat of bringing in palestinians from gaza writes the new american and they're right except that um it's not biden their headline says cbs says ignoring um cbs says the new american is

Starting point is 00:10:38 ignoring major national security threat biden envisions importing Gaza Palestinians. Biden didn't write that legislation. He didn't pass that legislation. Mike Johnson did, but they're not going to criticize him because he's a conservative Republican, supposedly. All you have to do is get yourself a label. See, Trump is not a globalist in spite of what he did in 2020, which was marching in lockstep and leading everybody, being at the front. He was a pied piper for the globalist agenda.

Starting point is 00:11:06 But he's an anti-globalist. We know that, don't we? We've been told that over and over again by both the establishment press and the controlled conservative press. He's anti-globalist, so he couldn't have betrayed us in 2020. Mike Johnson is a Christian conservative. He couldn't be betraying us like this. Except he is. He's a be betraying us like this. Except he is.

Starting point is 00:11:27 He's a traitor. He's a traitor. He sold out. I never expected Trump to do anything but sell us out. I expected better of Mike Johnson. So, listen, if it had been Pelosi doing this, do you think that they would have blamed her? Of course they would. Why aren't they blaming Mike Johnson for this?

Starting point is 00:11:52 Oh, Pelosi did this. Biden did this. They never say Trump or Mike Johnson did it, right? But they're right that it is a threat. They said left unexplained is why the Islamiclamic arab nations won't take them in well i think we know don't we why is it that saudi arabia doesn't want the palestinians or the united arab emirates doesn't want them or any of them uh so uh you know they they don't want to bring them in and here's how the thing is going to work. What CBS does say is that there are several thousand, they don't say how many, just say several thousand,

Starting point is 00:12:31 Palestinians that have not been deported. And they're going to use chain immigration to bring people in from Palestine. Are you related to somebody? Oh, you say you are? Okay, well, I don't have any way of checking that, so I'll just take your word for it. So you're related to these people in Palestine. Well, then come on in. You're all fine.

Starting point is 00:12:52 We've seen that happening across the border before. That's nothing new. It's just going to now be used to bring in people from Palestine. And then even if you don't have somebody who claims to be your relative here in the United States, you can claim that you're fleeing Hamas, which is a declared terrorist organization declared by the United States. And so if you say that you're fleeing Hamas, even if you are Hamas, you get a free ticket to come in and it's going to be you know even harder than it was with ms-13 you know the ms-13 gang they had a habit of having their face tattooed

Starting point is 00:13:35 with ms-13 and all of their gang symbols but you know the ice didn't care. The federal government didn't care. They let him come in anyway. I've told the story many times about the father who was distraught. He came from Venezuela. He knew about MS-13. He said, I'm sorry, not Venezuela. Let's see. I forget now. Is it Venezuela?

Starting point is 00:13:59 I know Salvador, where they're from. I think it's, anyway, he was from the same country, told the story many times, but now I've forgotten that detail getting old here. I guess the, uh, anyway, what he said was his daughter from the same country. Uh, I'm thinking it was El Salvador, but, um, he said we fled there and they went all the way up to long Island, New York to try to get away from them, except that there were so many of them there and they got into an argument with her and of course, um, uh, border patrol ice, Homeland security. They knew these kids were here illegally, but you know, we got DACA.

Starting point is 00:14:41 So the, uh, you have, uh, Obama's head of Homeland Security says, we're not going to enforce the law. I know that's the law, but we're not going to enforce it. And then Trump said, well, I'd like to get rid of that. I'd like to enforce the law, but let me ask the Supreme Court if I can enforce the law. Let me ask them if I can overturn an executive order from the previous president who said he wasn't going to enforce the law is that allowed and supreme court says of course not and he goes oh good okay well i can't do anything about it because the supreme court said i can't do anything about it so they're there they know that they are illegal immigrants and they know that they're ms-13 because it's tattooed all over their face but they won't do anything about it so what do you think about the hamas people you think

Starting point is 00:15:23 we're gonna do they tattoo the fact that they're hamas on their face no no they don't do anything about it. So what do you think about the Hamas people? Do they tattoo the fact that they're Hamas on their face? No. No, they don't do that. But it wouldn't matter if they did because our government wants to destroy this country. You understand? This is not incompetence. It's malice.

Starting point is 00:15:42 Politicians like Biden and Johnson hate America except for what they can get out of it and in that regard they're just like the people they're bringing in the drug gangs in central america hate america they want what they can get the people are coming in for the welfare magnet for the cloward and pivots if they hate america They want the free stuff and they don't care about this guy. They're going to go back. They're not going to bother to learn the language or get a citizenship. Most of them. And they're going to take what they can and go back.

Starting point is 00:16:14 And they're just like Biden and Johnson in it for what they can get out of it. It's a greed and power trip for Biden and Johnson. And it's a greed and power trip for Biden and Johnson. And it's a greed and power trip for these people as well. Bringing in more people just like them, frankly. And so the Johnson House, let's just put that in there because, you know, you have a conservative media does not like to talk about the Johnson House. If it says House approves. If it was Pelosi, it'd be Pelosi approves. If she was Speaker, it'd be Pelosi does this. But they won't say it's Johnson.

Starting point is 00:16:51 Just like it wasn't Trump. It was the pandemic. It was COVID that did all that stuff to us. No, it was Trump. It was Trump. It was Fauci. No, it was Trump. So Johnson approves the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.

Starting point is 00:17:09 Well, what we need is a Marxist Awareness Act. Because that's what these people are about. That's really the issue here. And evidently, Johnson and the Republicans are not aware that they are Marxists and that that's the real issue. Maybe somebody needs to make them aware. Maybe we need to have in response a First Amendment Awareness Act. Do you guys realize what you swore to as a condition of your office? Do you realize that if you violate your oath to the Constitution, you have no authority?

Starting point is 00:17:43 I don't care if the Supreme Court says it's okay. Not okay with me. So, Zero Hedge asked some questions about this. How and by what measure will federal authorities crack down on speech that is deemed anti-Semitic? And as I said at the very beginning, this is not about speech. They're using these Marxist riots as an excuse to crack down on speech. The lockdowns, folks, were not about a pandemic.

Starting point is 00:18:17 They were not about a virus. They were not about a sickness. They were about them exercising their new tools of control. The climate stuff is not about CO2. It's not about climate change. It's not about any of that stuff. It's about them having a pretext to exercise totalitarian control. And that's what this is about.

Starting point is 00:18:44 And so the questions now become, will criticism of the government of Israel be deemed anti-Semitic? What if we criticize a foreign political entity? Is that racism? Will highlighting alleged war crimes or human rights abuses by the IDF be considered anti-Semitic? Will involvement in the BDS movement, that's to disinvest from anybody that has any, disinvest from supporting, financially supporting Israel. Will involvement in the BDS movement be deemed anti-Jewish? Will slogans such as, from the river to the sea, Palestine be free, will that be illegal according to federal law? Look, we don't have anybody left anymore that supports free speech, do we? Nobody supports free speech.

Starting point is 00:19:28 And by that, I mean, when you support free speech, you support the right of people to say things that you disagree with. We don't have anybody like that. The people on the left, if you disagree with them, they want to shout you down and cancel you. People on the right, if they disagree with what you have to say, they want to shout you down and cancel you. People on the right, if they disagree with what you have to say, they want to shout you down and cancel you. I mean, just look at what Mark Levin was saying. We need to make sure these people never have a job anywhere. Right?

Starting point is 00:19:53 Boy, talk about taking canceling to the next level. Why are conservatives talking about that? Isn't it a bad thing to be canceled off of the digital public square? Yes. Is it a bad thing to be kicked out of your bank because they don't like your politics and religion? Yes. Is it a bad thing to be marked so that you're not able to get a job? Yes.

Starting point is 00:20:16 Why are they criticizing what Mark Levin said? Oh, they're high-fiving him on that stuff. He is a shameless, racist tyrant. He applauded everything the deep state wanted to do. He was opposed to Trump when Trump was saying the right stuff as a candidate in 2016. When he became president, he became a shameless apologist for him. He was telling Trump, brag about the fact that you did the vaccines. Biden is trying to take credit for them.

Starting point is 00:20:43 We need to give Trump a ticker tape parade. Like we need to give him a striped suit and a life sentence, multiple life sentences for the millions of lives that he destroyed. And you too, Mark Levin. That's what needs to be done. That's, you know, those are actual crimes, not because of what they said,

Starting point is 00:21:03 but because of what they did. And these are the people who get away with these crimes of murder, literal mass murder. They want to shut down your free speech. I wonder why. They don't want anybody to talk about that, do they? Oh, I tell you, you can smell these people a mile away as soon as they come after speech, it's like, okay, what's his game here? What is he trying to pull on us? How is he trying to make us poor slaves to the globalists?

Starting point is 00:21:38 Will criticizing the three plus billion dollars in annual foreign aid to Israel, will that be considered to be anti-Jewish? And what are the many Jewish protesters who are engaged in speech condemning the nation's state of Israel? Show the picture there, Travis, of this article here. Zero hedge. Ultra-Orthodox Jewish protesters. Yeah, they were the ones.

Starting point is 00:22:01 They don't like the political government of Israel. And actually, they're not Zionist either. They said, if there's a picture of them, they said, yes, God has promised Israel to the Jews, and he will do it miraculously, not politically like this. And they don't support the policies of people like Netanyahu as well but nobody wants to debate nobody wants to tolerate allowing somebody to say anything that they disagree with and they don't want to debate instead they want to force people force people off of. Force people out of their job. Force people off of social media. Force, force, force everywhere they go. The hand of force to destroy liberty. Everywhere. That's always a solution from these people. It doesn't matter if it's Mike Johnson

Starting point is 00:22:55 or the Palestinian Marxist on campus. It's always the same thing. Or Mark Levin. You know, we're going to punish these people because they don't like what they have to say. And we're going to silence them and shut them up forever. Well, that's not the way of liberty. That's not what made this country great. That is the path to tyranny and slavery, folks. If you can't challenge and criticize the government, especially a foreign government, are you kidding me? And what does that say about the outsized control that they have over our government if you're not allowed to criticize them?

Starting point is 00:23:32 Amazing. Free speech is defending the speech that you disagree with. Already active participation in causes that are boycotting Israel is now illegal in a number of U.S. states. As a matter of fact, when you go back and look at what DeSantis did so he could get big Jewish donors, I guess the widow of the big casino owner, Sheldon Adelson, she's still got a lot of money. She used to be the biggest contributor to the Republican Party. She's in Israel now, so I guess maybe that's why he went there to sign the bill so she

Starting point is 00:24:08 had noticed and but nevertheless you know he signed a bill saying that anti any anti-semitic speech is a hate crime and it's going to be treated as a felony. Well, why isn't the violence that these people are doing, isn't that enough to treat that as a felony? You do the hate speech stuff simply because you want to get rid of free speech. And as we see at USF, amazing. Like I said yesterday, I had a school where I met Karen, University of Tampa, 50 years ago. Somebody dumped a baby in the trash can there. And then the next day I look at this and the school that I went to graduated from USF, they got protesters, um, uh, and fighting with

Starting point is 00:24:52 the police there. And, and the question I had was since DeSantis already put in a bill saying that any criticism of, uh, uh, Jewish people or anti-semitic and it's a hate speech felony are they going to charge these usf protesters with a felony i say is it is it going to be if they get into a fight with the police if they get into a fight with students on campus and try to keep people off if they bust into buildings and destroy public property. Those are not as important. The worst crime is what they say. Are we going to accept that for America? I'm sorry, that's not acceptable.

Starting point is 00:25:36 Those other things are real crimes. When you talk about a hate crime, you're really talking about judging somebody's motive. And you're talking about a thought crime, but it's also to be able to censor anyone and everyone. And these conservatives who are out there trying to shut people down for antisemitism are no better than the left who, when you say, well, tell me something about why you're here. Racist, racist, get out of here. You know, that's, that's exactly, they're exactly the same.

Starting point is 00:26:07 Isn't it amazing how alike the left and the right are? I hate these parties. I hate these Democrats and Republicans with a passion. Every day I look at them and I hate them more because they hate America. They hate our liberty. They want to kill us in wars and revolutions and civil wars. They're disease.

Starting point is 00:26:30 Disease of the mind and the soul. These political parties. The founders hated political parties. Maybe they knew something. They hated partisanship. Boy, do i hate it the bill would require the department of education to use the international holocaust remembrance alliance working definition of anti-semitism when enforcing anti-discrimination laws and there's one of the uh people pushing back against it said oh okay so there's no

Starting point is 00:27:03 definition of anti-semitism in this anti anti-semitism law and it's just kind of like what they say it's what those people say we're going to reference an external group well what they say reminds me very much of what the fbi was doing labeling people as terrorists and as extremists and all that kind of, like me, okay, because I was attacked by the Anti-Defamation League or I was attacked by the Southern Poverty Law Center? The FBI said, well, we'll just let them decide who the terrorists are. So the Congress is going to let this International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance

Starting point is 00:27:39 decide who's anti-Semitic and what is anti-Semitic. The group defines anti-Semitism as, quote, a certain perception of Jews which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Well, let's understand that these same people have been selling us this race-baiting agenda, love to talk about unconscious bias. Well, you may not actually hate Jews, but what you're saying is harmful to Jews, so therefore you are unconsciously biased against them.

Starting point is 00:28:11 That's what we're saying with the black and white stuff and all the rest of the thing. Unconscious bias. I know you don't really have any animosity to anybody, but you're a hateful racist anyway. You have unconscious bias simply because you're white. And they say rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism, rhetorical, are directed towards Jewish and non-Jewish individuals. The organization provides a number of examples for what qualifies as anti-Semitism, including

Starting point is 00:28:41 calling for the harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or extremist view of religion. And of course, they will tell us what is radical and they will tell us what is extreme. We have seen people at PTA meetings and school board meetings being labeled as extremists because they oppose the sexual grooming of children. They oppose pornography being shoved in the faces of young kids and put in the libraries of the schools.

Starting point is 00:29:13 You are an extremist. No, they are the extremists. But they're the ones wielding the labels uh so um so any extremist view of religion or accusing jewish jewish individuals as inventing or exaggerating the holocaust so um even a theoretical discussion writes this zero hedge article or interpretation could be considered to be illegal, as it already is in some European countries. Matt Walsh said the legislation itself never says what the definition of anti-Semitism is.

Starting point is 00:29:54 All it says is that the definition is whatever this other group says, what they say. It grants the force of law to whatever that organization happens to decree on the subject. And of course, it's not even fixed to whatever they say it is at this point in time. What if they change their definition of this? By the way, this is what they're about to do with the WHO's international health regulations. Well, pandemic is whatever the WHO says it is. Anti-Semitism is whatever this Jewish organization says it is. So if they say it's anti-Semitism, you're gone.

Starting point is 00:30:35 If they say it's a pandemic, you're locked down. You've got to have your passports, all the rest of this stuff. This is, you know, our government for the longest time, Congress has kicked the can to the other side to the bureaucracy so that they don't have to write the law so we've got laws we got regulation without representation congress is useless at this point folks and so because they have kicked this over to the bureaucracy forever now. And now they're going to another step. Now they are going to kick it to outside organizations.

Starting point is 00:31:15 So we're not going to have even, you know, the president with an executive order lock us down, declaring a pandemic. No, we'll let a foreign organization do it we're not going to have the congress uh attack free speech in the name of anti-semitism they're not even going to give us a definition they'll go to some outside organization for that it's just amazing it kind of reminds me of what Trump did with the gun control stuff. It was bad enough that Congress would pass gun control legislation

Starting point is 00:31:51 in defiance of the Second Amendment. But then Trump did it by executive order. Biden and La La Harris love that. It just keeps getting worse. Washington is gone, folks. So Marjorie Teller Greene says, anti-Semitism is wrong, but I will not be voting for the anti-Semitism awareness act.

Starting point is 00:32:16 It's not even about awareness. It should call it the anti-Semitism punishment act or whatever this, again, it doesn't even have to be anti-Semitism punishment act or whatever this, um, it's again, it doesn't even have to be anti-Semitism because it's something's being defined by this outside group may not be actual anti-Semitism. And I've said that for the longest time as well. You know, when you point the finger at everybody and say, you're racist, racist, racist, what do you do? You give a real pass to the racist people out there. they call everybody racist you call everybody racist

Starting point is 00:32:45 nobody's racist really that's what happens so the people are actually racist get off with a free pass um so she said um this could convict christians of anti-semitism for believing the gospel that says jesus was handed over to herod to be crucified by the Jews. Well, that's not the good news. The good news is what he gives us. But still, when you look at what the Bible says, it doesn't simply say that he was crucified. Pilate had responsibility for it. The Jewish leaders had responsibility for it. The Jewish people who said crucifyate had responsibility for it. The Jewish leaders had responsibility for it.

Starting point is 00:33:26 The Jewish people who said crucify him had responsibility for it. But Jesus said, I lay my life down. No one takes it from me. He voluntarily did that. And here's the good news. And you know what else? We were responsible for his crucifixion. He wouldn't have needed to lay down his life if it wasn't for our sins. You know, you ask people in all these other religions,

Starting point is 00:33:54 what do you do with your sin? Well, I just hope for the best. I do lots of good works, and I hope that it outweighs it. Well, you can't ever get right with God after you have rebelled against him, the punishment for that is death. And the animal sacrifices were a picture of the ultimate sacrifice that would have to be paid for us to get back in God's good graces. So who killed Jesus? I did. You did. He died for your sins. He died for my sins.

Starting point is 00:34:28 So all this stuff about, but again again you have people who will use that you know people attacked ml gibson for his his movie uh said oh it's um uh it anyway uh they don't understand the gospel uh currently and historically pro-israel hawks who advocate for sending billions in American taxpayer dollars to Israel each year tend to accuse any and all opponents of such policies of being anti-Semitic. Some independent journalists say they have struggled to find blatant examples of people being targeted in anti-Semitic attacks on campuses. You know, yeah, anybody opposes them on anything. They call you racist or anti-Semitic. Quite frankly, I don't care.

Starting point is 00:35:13 You know, load it up. Call me whatever you want. I don't really care. I know what's going on. I know what's true. And you can call me an anti-vaxxer, a conspiracy theorist, whatever you want to call me. I mean, I will admit to those.

Starting point is 00:35:27 I'm not racist or anti-Semitic, but I am anti-vax. And I have lots of not just even conspiracy theories. I've got a lot of conspiracy facts. So I don't really care about those labels. None of us should. So Matt don't really care about those labels. None of us should. So Matt Walsh again, he says, the vast majority of Republicans just voted for a bill to criminalize criticism of the Israeli government.

Starting point is 00:35:56 And think about this, folks. If they can criminalize criticism of the Israeli government, you think they'll do it with the American government? In a sense, they have, right, already, in many different ways. If the bill passes, you will be guilty of hate speech if you apply double standards, quote-unquote, to the government of Israel,

Starting point is 00:36:14 or if you accuse it of genocide. And so, I don't know, is he going to be fired by Ben Shapiro for saying that? New York City Mayor,ic adams surprised me he actually got upset when he saw them waving the flag of another country he said it's despicable that schools would allow another country to fly uh would allow another country's flag to fly in America, that they would take down the American flag, they would fly their Palestinian flag.

Starting point is 00:36:51 Well, you know, I kind of felt that way about Congress, you know, when all these Democrats were waving the Ukrainian flag. The Democrats and Johnson wasn't waving it, but he knew it was going to happen. I mean, don't tell me that all the democrats are getting a ukrainian flag and johnson doesn't know it they're walking in they're handing them flags or or they're walking in carrying their flags or something he doesn't know it is he really that stupid no he's not that stupid that's one thing he's not he is uh very cunning he's not that stupid he knows one thing he's not he is uh very cunning he's not that

Starting point is 00:37:25 stupid he knows that they had those flags and he let that go on for quite some time before you had chip roy and uh others get up there and say that's a violation of the rules stop that and then of course that video there was done by thomas massey and uh he had the uh chief law enforcement why they call him sergeant of arms i think uh he wanted to find massey not find the people waving the flags which is every bit as much a violation protocol as filming the people waving the flags see they can do whatever they want if you report their crimes you committed a crime for reporting them so yeah um eric adams said it was despicable that u.s schools would allow another country's flag to fly on their campuses while defending the new york police department after

Starting point is 00:38:19 hundreds of officers in riot gear broke up pro-palestinian protests on columbia university's campus and they took down the flag as well so to me that was kind of surprising i didn't expect to see eric adams defending the american flag so adams became heated after police showed a number of videos that included protests at Columbia, as well as a protest at city college in New York where demonstrators took down an American flag. He said another significant part of the video was at the end said Adams. That's our flag folks. You don't take over our buildings and put another flag up. That may be fine to other people, but it's not to me.

Starting point is 00:39:02 I guess it was okay though for him when they were removing statues and stuff. And quite frankly, it bothers me more to see statues of people who contributed to society, who were not perfect. Nobody is perfect. But if they moved us in a major direction towards liberty, had some major accomplishments, and we honor them. That's what these people are tearing down because they want to tear down our society. They want to take us back into the Stone Ages. They want to level everything so they can

Starting point is 00:39:34 reconstruct their socialist revolution. And we've now got these leaders of this movement saying that on campus. Now, we have to destroy everything so we can have our Marxist revolution. They're actually saying that. I've got a recording of it. I'm going to play for you here in a minute, but you know, when they, they remove these statues, you know, the flag is a political enemy, enemy entity should say, and it is now a political enemy Freudian slip there. Yeah, that's right. Trump is accepted the invitation to speak at the libertarian party.

Starting point is 00:40:06 That should be interesting. What is reception is going to be? I don't know what they're going to do. I would, I know what would have happened when I was there. Of course, a libertarian party has changed. I haven't changed,

Starting point is 00:40:18 but the libertarian party has, but the way it was identified, most of these articles are identified as libertarian party. And then I saw one of them it was from raw story their headline was trump agrees to speak to anti-government group it's like what is that yeah that's what they call libertarian uh party an anti-government group and i thought about it for a second i thought okay i'll take. I'll accept that label. I'm anti-vax. I'm anti-government. I'm a conspiracy theorist.

Starting point is 00:40:49 I don't really care. Those are accurate labels, actually, quite frankly, of me. So it bothers me more to see these statues taken down. You think you're perfect? You don't think there's anything in your life that is wrong? Have you accomplished anything? These people that have statues put up for them, most of them made some significant contributions to our society and to our understanding. Okay, Jefferson had slaves, but do you understand the other things that he did?

Starting point is 00:41:26 And do you understand that most of the people, not most of the people, but most of the wealthy people and the people who were in government at the time had slaves? But that doesn't, that blindness in their life does not take away from their warnings and their understandings about about power and how it needs to not be centralized and those are the takeaways that and the things like the Bill of Rights that we now despise quite frankly I'm more than

Starting point is 00:41:59 happy slavery is gone and I would like to keep the Bill of Rights but these people want to talk about an institution that's gone so they can destroy the Bill of Rights. And the way they do that is by taking down the statues to the people who wrote the Bill of Rights and other things like that. Yeah, they were not perfect, but it bothers me a lot more to see that happen than it does to see a flag taken down. Because the flag also represents what our government is today. And yes, I am anti-government.

Starting point is 00:42:33 I despise what both parties are doing today. Says Eric Adams, my uncle died defending this country. These men and women put their lives on the line. It's despicable that schools allow another country's flag to fly in our country. Well, you know, and a lot of the people that they tore down these statues of, a lot of them died because of what they did as well. And they also left a legacy. He said, we're not surrendering our way of life to anyone. What a joke. This is the guy who is destroying private cars and he's allowing crime basically to go unanswered.

Starting point is 00:43:18 And he's bringing in all the migrants and giving them, putting them at the head of the line and giving them the illegal immigrants giving them more than he does the american citizens are you kidding me we're not going to surrender our way of life to anyone he's been one of the key guys pushing the c40 agenda uh that's surrendering my ability to even eat meat and have milk or travel. That's surrendering that to the globalists. And he's a part of that. It's so strange to see Eric Adams defending the American flag. And it's equally strange for me to see the university of North Carolina Chapel Hill, where you got a fraternity that is defending the American flag.

Starting point is 00:43:59 That is the last place on earth that I would have expected, except for New York, that I would have expected the American flag to be defended because we used to live not too far from UNC Chapel Hill. Very surprising to me. But it's a bunch of guys in a fraternity, and as the Marxists were coming for the flag, they stood there defending it. It went viral. They put up a GoFundMe thing.

Starting point is 00:44:26 Interestingly enough, Bill Ackman, who has been in fights with Harvard over this Gaza-Palestine stuff and everything, he wanted to do a kind of McCarthy blacklisting, just like Mark Levin, of people that he disagreed with. He doesn't support free speech, but he supports making sure that these people who have signed their name or whatever wants him kicked out of school, wants them to never have a job working for anybody ever in their life. Very McCarthyism, right? Blacklisting people for life. And, you know, he has an interesting history. I haven't talked about it before, but bill, uh, Ackman, uh, hedge fund manager, he made a fortune shorting the stock market, uh, as the lockdowns were about to come early March. And then he goes on TV and makes this emotional play with

Starting point is 00:45:26 president Trump to shut the country down. After he's already put in his orders to profit from the plunging stock market. Great guy. Great guy. I really respect people like him. He endorsed a Bloomberg, the Democrat technocrat, the climate terrorist, eco-terrorist, whatever you want to call him. That's what Bloomberg is. He's an eco-terrorist, I guess, is maybe the best way.

Starting point is 00:45:50 But he was a big supporter of Michael Bloomberg. And he wants McCarthyism against people that he disagrees with. Look, I disagree with those people as well. But I don't like to see this blacklisting, this cancel culture that is being put out there because it's directed at free speech. So, um, when you look at,

Starting point is 00:46:11 uh, what Thomas Massey said about this anti-Semitism bill, he says, do you agree with all these examples of anti-Semitism? And he lists what was put in there. Uh, you might be an anti-Semitic or you might be anti-Semitic if you are, you know, it's kind of like, you might be a redneck if you, Foxworthy, remember that? Well, you might be anti-Semitic if you do any of these things.

Starting point is 00:46:35 There's a long list. He puts this up. He says, should people in America be prosecuted for saying these things in all contexts uh see the issue is is that nobody in america should be prosecuted for saying anything if they are we don't have a free country we don't have the bill of rights we don't have the first amendment if you can be prosecuted for saying anything. And so the example out of the bill says, well, it could include, but it is not limited to. And it's got a very long list here,

Starting point is 00:47:15 but of course it could be anything. It includes, but it's not limited to. Oh, that's nice. So we still don't know what the boundaries of this are. It's a completely open-ended thing. It can be things like stereotypical allegations or a myth about a world Jewish conspiracy. I say this all the time. George Soros.

Starting point is 00:47:39 You can't criticize George Soros. Why? Because he's Jewish. But he hates the Jewish people, right? He's Jewish. So if you criticize George Soros because he's Jewish, you call him a globalist, which he is. But since he's Jewish, he gets a pass on that because we've got this stereotype out there about a global Jewish conspiracy. Well, the problem is, is that that also includes people like Gates, who's not Jewish. It includes people like the Rockefellers, who's not Jewish.

Starting point is 00:48:07 It includes Klaus Schwab, who's not Jewish. Yeah, there's a lot of Jews in it. But there's a lot of non-Jews in it as well. Why don't we look at what people actually do? I'm not going to be intimidated by these kinds of labels. And you shouldn't be either we need to push back and resist in the same way that you got even a fraternity at unc chapel hell resisting people taking the american flag can we resist them taking our first amendment if you accuse jewish citizens

Starting point is 00:48:41 of being more loyal to israel or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide than to the interests of their own nations. What if I accuse Congress of being more loyal to other countries than they are to America? Waving their flag, sending the money to these other places and not giving us a penny instead. Allocating three and a half billion dollars for Biden to bring in people from Palestine. Do you think that these paid politicians are more loyal to Ukraine and to Israel than they are to America? They just proved it a couple of Saturdays ago. They proved it. Go look at the bill and tell me that they're not more loyal to foreign governments than they

Starting point is 00:49:25 are to us. And again, that includes people like Mike Johnson, who are not Jewish, but they are more loyal to them than they are to America. And so it finishes up by saying anti-Semitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law for example denial of a holocaust or distribution of anti-semitic materials in some countries or if it's like andrew bridgen talking about how many people have been killed by this jab and he says it's um he said and he he was quoting a scientist who said that so the said, it's going to be like that. It's like a Holocaust. Oh, you can't say that.

Starting point is 00:50:08 That's anti-Semitic. It's like, no, it's not. That's not even denying the Holocaust. Oh, it's got to be separate. Look, we know that Stalin and Mao killed more people than died in the Holocaust. That's a fact. But, you know, you can't't don't talk about that at all. And so you're going to take somebody who is trying to tell us the truth about this mass murder. And that's what the conservative party in the UK used to silence and to cancel him.

Starting point is 00:50:37 You said something about the Holocaust. I'm done with this stuff, folks. I really am. I am sick to death of people like Johnson, these shills that are up there. So anyway, when you look at it, and there's a lot of this back and forth from these people about Jesus and his crucifixion and that type of stuff. Look, there's no telling where these people are going to use this. There's a lot of different ways that they're going to persecute us. I think it's even bigger when you look at the tip of the spear.

Starting point is 00:51:13 It's really not the anti-Semitism charges. The tip of the spear is the LGBT stuff. But again, going back to USF. Police used tear gas on protesters there at USF where I graduated from. And 50 years ago, we had radical Marxists that were there at the time. Uh, they weren't in engineering. They, you know, hung out in other places, but, um, so at UCLA, again, folks, this is

Starting point is 00:51:41 not free speech. Let me show you what they're doing at UCLA. Look at this. Somebody is being beaten. Somebody is being beaten. Somebody is being beaten with a stick and punches in the middle of the lawn. Is that free speech? Is that free speech? Why isn't that the bigger concern?

Starting point is 00:51:56 At the bottom of that brawl right there. Yeah. Hand-to-hand melee with sticks and... Look at that. Look at that. Somebody is being dragged and beaten in the front of that plywood wall. Wasn't it Einstein who said the Third World War would be fought with sticks and stones? Maybe he's talking about the campuses.

Starting point is 00:52:20 I don't know. Just incredible. Like, where are the police? Where is security? Where are these people? Yeah. This is L.A. Where are the police? Where is security? Where are these people? This is L.A. Where is authority here? Where Daryl Gates gave us the militarized police with their MRAPs and all the rest of this stuff.

Starting point is 00:52:35 He gave us the SWAT teams. He gave us the no-knock raids. We were never covered without any sign of enforcement, law enforcement, security whatsoever. This has gone now on for over an hour and a half. And it is absolutely appalling, in my estimation, that we have not seen any response. I've just never seen it. Yeah, yeah.

Starting point is 00:52:56 And it goes on and on. You know, that's what we saw. Daryl Gates, when he was still there, he's not there anymore now. He was there in the 90s, 30 years ago. But he was the one who gave us SWAT teams and no-knock raids and militarized police and all the rest of this stuff. And then when you had the Rodney King riots, what do you do? They used all that stuff to protect themselves.

Starting point is 00:53:16 They circled the wagons around the police stations and let everybody else fend for themselves, which is what they're doing right now at UCLA campus. What does that tell you? Well, we saw it 30 years ago. We see it now. When they get their societal breakdown, folks, you're on your own. There's not going to be anybody on the other end of the line coming to help you. And so, again, you know, think about what you're going to do to prepare. What are you going to do to prepare for food?

Starting point is 00:53:47 Do you want to be dependent on them for food? Oh, so they're going to put you in a FEMA camp until you got to be vaccinated, all the rest of this stuff, right? So you don't want to be dependent on them for food. You don't want to use their financial system. You don't want to be dependent on them to protect yourself. And so, again, you need to take a look at civildefensemanual.com. He's got great chapters on so many different things, but especially about building community,

Starting point is 00:54:15 because you don't want to be by yourself either. Massive numbers of people can overwhelm you in any of these situations. But it's about how to feed yourself, how to get together in a community, to defend the community, that type of thing. And you also want to make sure that you are outside of their financial system. Tony Arteman set up DavidKnight.Gold. And so you go there and you can gradually start to accumulate gold or silver. You can get quantity discounts.

Starting point is 00:54:45 That's part of that buyer group that he's got. The Wolfpack that's there. You can go from $50 on up. And actually, he's got a kid's version that goes down to $35 each month. Or you can buy gold and silver at any big or small individual purchases. It doesn't have to be a part of that. He just set that up for people who want to do it on a regular basis, make it a part of their budget and get quantity discounts as part of a buyer's group.

Starting point is 00:55:12 But he will buy or sell the stuff for people and he, he doesn't run out of it like they do at Costco. You know, he'll, if you place an order, he'll get it for you at that price. He places his order, gets a hold on it it may take a little bit of time for it to show up but he'll get it for you at that price so uh go to david knight dot gold i really do appreciate tony's support of this program we're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back i got one more one or two more things to talk about but i also want to talk about with this the campus wars actually the war is on free speech but i want to talk about the new regulations another week another couple of regulations of things that you're that are going

Starting point is 00:55:56 to be banned for you as biden is making houses more expensive he's making everything unaffordable he's got more regulations for houses, more regulations for power generation, more regulations for appliances. There was an interesting back and forth there. The White House reporter asked his press secretary, you know, when does this all end? Well, it doesn't until we end it. If you like the Eagles, on a dark desert highway,

Starting point is 00:56:25 the cars, and Huey Lewis and the news, they say the hotter rock and roll is competing. You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio. Download our app or listen now at APSradio.com. © BF-WATCH TV 2021 Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show. I want to thank Michelle Obama. Thank you very much, Anwar.

Starting point is 00:58:06 Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that. Well, I said I've got more to say about this. Again, they make it about free speech, but here's a Jewish student wearing a Star of David necklace, denied entry to his own university because he's Jewish. I'm a UCLA student, he says. I deserve to go here. We pay tuition. This is our school, and they're not letting me walk in. And by the way, a lot of the people who are there,

Starting point is 00:58:31 the protesters, don't go to that school, but they're keeping students who do go to that school out. But let me ask you, why do you think this would be any different? All of my life, I've watched these schools like UCLA and Harvard and Columbia. I've watched them keep people out because they're not the right skin color or because they're not the right gender, whichever gender they want to imagine. They have the people running these institutions. And now you've got these donors like Ackman or Ackerman or whatever that they gave money all that time, and they were just fine with it until the mob turned against them.

Starting point is 00:59:14 That's what always happens. It's just like Robespierre. You generate this Marxist mob, and eventually the mob comes for you. And so that's what's happening with us. Why is that a surprise? Because for decades they have been telling somebody, you can't come here because you're this or you're that. So why wouldn't they now at this point say,

Starting point is 00:59:37 you can't come in because you're Jewish. They've been saying that to white people, to males for a long time at these universities. And so you look at what is happening. It's not just, of course, this one. At Columbia, here are the Palestinian protesters. And you can see some of these people obviously are not students there. They're pretty old, I think.

Starting point is 01:00:01 Maybe they're professors teaching this stuff. But here's the fight that's going on here. Big mob coming in. They're busting into these buildings and there's two guys there. They're locking arms and say, no, we're going to stand here protecting us. And so these people wearing masks are shoving them around. By the way, that guy wearing the glasses there. That's the grandson of Doug Wilson.

Starting point is 01:00:22 He says, I'm very proud of him for standing there. And so here's the mob of Doug Wilson. He says, I'm very proud of him for standing there. And so here's the mob, big mob, against two people, shoving them. This is how you do that. Come on. This is how you do that. Yes, it is. It's 100% assault. I got it on. He says, this is assault. This is 100% assault. Sir, this is 100% assault.

Starting point is 01:00:42 You can get the Mitchell out. This is 100% assault. You can get the Mitchell out. Anyone. Is someone recording this? I got it. I got it. Yeah, what's your name? They got caps on. They got the N95 Fauci masks on. They won't give their names, right? Yeah. Free speech, right? Is this free speech? Well, you know, Mike Johnson looks at this and he says,

Starting point is 01:01:11 you know what we need? We need a regulation coming out of Congress that shuts down free speech. That's his response to all this stuff. Pathetic. Pathetic. UCLA, the brawls and everything else that are happening there. It's pathetic that they would make this about that's not about free speech at all there's nothing at the universities about free speech that's the thing that bothers me so much about uh mike johnson

Starting point is 01:01:36 and these other people well here's what this is about we had one of them explain it to everybody uh this is really about a Marxist revolution. This wretched system. There's only one way. Just like that chant that we enjoy so much. There is only one solution. Indie Potter revolution. Yay, the crowd likes that. Yep, that's it.

Starting point is 01:02:19 Let's understand what this is about. It's not about free speech. It's not about debate. This is about violence. It's not about debate. This is about violence is about mob violence. And as he said, there's only one solution. Intifada revolution. We must have a revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction of the USA.

Starting point is 01:02:42 You see, we have these, these, um, Reconstruction of the USA. You see, we have these youthful idiots at the bottom who have been radicalized by our indoctrination systems. And then at the top, we've got the people like Klaus Schwab saying the same thing, quite frankly. You know, Klaus Schwab and his ilk are Marxists.

Starting point is 01:03:01 They've got Common Pass, and they've got the Commons and they've got you know the commons project and because they're a communist they're communist and they want universal basic income where you don't own anything because folks they're communist how many different ways do they have to tell us they're not woke they're not climate uh you know they're communists and uh so they want this at the top they want to destroy everything as he points out we have to have a revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction destroy everything and then reconstruct it in their communist utopia, which is dystopian hell. That's what this stuff is about from all of these people. And absolutely no question about it.

Starting point is 01:03:52 Let's talk a little bit about climate here. We have, I was talking about the moves yesterday by the Biden administration, and now you've got BlackRock. Larry Fink has made his move and is telling people at the World Economic Forum investment tip. What we need to do is get into some other alternative form of energy because our AI centers are really hungry. And he doesn't say it, but so are their surveillance centers. And that's ultimately what AI is going to be about is surveillance. So you look at these massive data centers that the NSA is running and you look at the

Starting point is 01:04:32 artificial intelligence, the amount of energy that these things are using is astronomical. Now he talks about that and he says, you know, it's going to explode. So, uh, and we're not going to be able to uh to have the energy for artificial intelligence and for surveillance that we need if it's wind and solar so we got to go to something else well by administration on the one hand it's starting to say well let's go to neutral a nuclear because we're going to we're still going to shut down all the coal plants they're just too cheap and plentiful. So we can't have anything that's cheap and plentiful. Everything must be expensive because this is about a transfer of wealth to the few. So they've got to give us the most expensive ones. And we've got to make sure that these people at

Starting point is 01:05:17 the top, when they burn everything down, that when America is reconstructed, they're going to be on the ground floor and everybody's going to be paying them. And so they've been shutting down coal plants. And now the other hand of the Biden administration is saying, well, we're going to put restrictions on Russian uranium, which is only 25%, but it is also 25%. And we take away 25% of your supply. If you're a retailer trying to operate on a small margin, if they take away 25% of your business, you're out of business. And so, uh, there's a lot of, um, coal, natural gas plants that, um,

Starting point is 01:06:03 whether taking down, will they start up nuclear power plants that they took down before? We'll have to wait and see. But the bottom line is it's going to be them who is going to make the money. Now, the Daily Skeptic asked, why is the WHO asking doctors to lie in order to promote climate alarmism? Well, because they're both MacGuffins. And because the goals are the same. And because they lie about everything. The WHO has published a new toolkit empowering health professionals to tackle climate change.

Starting point is 01:06:40 There's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't converge these MacGuffins. Because again, they want, in the end, they want the same thing. They want depopulation, and then they want control of the people who are left. In fact, it requires healthcare professionals to use their authority to eschew science and to lie to their patients and politicians. The climate war is, after all, political. That's what the Daily Skeptic said. Yeah, that's right.

Starting point is 01:07:08 And by the way, so is medicine now. Medicine is also political. So why shouldn't they, if they're both political and they've got the same goal, why shouldn't they merge? Since the climate scare story emerged in the 1980s, well, that's when they made it about global warming. But before that, through the 70s, it was all about the Ice Age. But they still wanted the same thing.

Starting point is 01:07:33 They just changed with the fashions. The era of global boiling, as UN Secretary Guterres put this, this also happens to be the era in which unprecedented social development has occurred. So surprisingly, for a toolkit that is aimed at people such as doctors who have proven capacity to understand scientific literature, if they care, which they don't typically. They read the marketing press releases from Big Pharmaceutical and they pass that on to you. The toolkit offers little evidence in support of these claims. Well, the doctors have been prepared for this because they were willing to accept little or no evidence about a pandemic.

Starting point is 01:08:15 They're willing to accept little or no evidence about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. They didn't even care to vet the lies that were there, that lies that would not pass just critical thought, let alone show me your data in a scientific investigation. So this toolkit says that changing weather patterns, quote unquote, and extreme weather events can reduce crop yields, potentially leading to food insecurity and malnutrition. That's the plan, isn't it? Food insecurity and malnutrition, poverty, slavery to these people.

Starting point is 01:08:54 As data clearly shows, though, since 1990, there have been radical reductions in mortality caused by malaria, malnutrition, diarrheal disease, natural disasters, exposure to temperature extremes. You see, one of the best things that you can do for people, not just the quality of their life, but life expectancies, to make sure they've got cheap, abundant energy. And, you know, things like hygiene follow from that. We don't improve our health with vaccines. We improve our health, interestingly enough, with cheap, abundant energy, which is why they're trying to take it away from us. How does the data compare with the WHO's claim that the frequency and intensity of these events is surpassing the capacity of both natural and human systems to respond effectively?

Starting point is 01:09:41 Well, they show the charts in this Daily Skeptic article here. They say diarrheal disease mortality has fallen by two-thirds in the period between 1990 and 2017. Malaria deaths have been cut in half. Yeah, you know, you got air conditioning. You can avoid, as everybody does now, they avoid the outdoors. They stay indoors with the air conditioning. You don't get bit by the mosquitoes or whatever.

Starting point is 01:10:07 But anyway, a similar paradox can be shown by comparing the WHO's statements on food security with other UN agencies' data. There is no evidence of climate change adversely affecting agricultural production and vulnerable economies. But they want to do that anyway. They want to shut down farms. And now they're trying to use bird flu to shut down our food supply as well. Bill Gates wants to use AI to genetically modify beef cows so that he can save the planet. He wants to make it, I guess, so that they can't fart.

Starting point is 01:10:44 They'll just blow up i guess float away turn into big balloons and there you go we got uh cow flew the cow flew away uh he couldn't fart so he just blew up like a big balloon and flew away like the wizard of oz microsoft founder bill gates recently discussed how ai could fight climate change on his podcast his podcast is called unconfused me with Bill Gates. Well, I wouldn't want to be confused with Bill Gates either. If I were Bill Gates,

Starting point is 01:11:11 it was just the type of unhinged conversation you would expect from the same man who touts synthetic beef depopulation and preventing cows from burping and farting says technocracy news so when he was discussing in this interview with data scientist hannah ritchie he says i was very stunned how the ais went from basically not being able to read or write at all to doing that in a very facile way he said when asked if he thought AI could play a role in taking action on the climate, he said, oh, absolutely. Yeah, because it'll be there to measure and to watch and to record and to re-snitch on

Starting point is 01:11:57 everything that we do. It's going to have a big role in that because that's what this is all about. Absolutely, he said. He cited the examples of genetically modifying beef cattle with ai so they can produce less methane you know this is i'm saying multiple articles every day about using artificial intelligence with genetic modification you know we talk about genetics robotics artificial intelligence nanotechnology the acronym The acronym is GRAIN. And they're starting to converge, aren't they?

Starting point is 01:12:29 In a lot of different ways. I mean, we see robotics and artificial intelligence. That's how you get these robots that are able to look at the table and you give them instructions and it pulls the stuff out. So robotics and artificial intelligence, we've seen that being merged. Now there's all this stuff about artificial intelligence and genetics, and that really concerns me because i've used chat gpt it really concerns me uh so anyway he says so we can genetically modify the beef cattle so they produce less methane or by using ai to somehow produce meat without the cow well here's an idea bill why don't you let produce meat without the cow.

Starting point is 01:13:06 Well, here's an idea, Bill. Why don't you let us eat without the gates? Why don't you let us eat without constantly hectoring us about what we are eating? You're really tired of his advice. As a matter of fact, a lot of people are tired of his foods. Remember, he invested in impossible foods he invested in upside foods which really ought to be called upside down foods he invested in beyond meat which i think ought to be called beyond food anyway um uh he and his ilk are nothing more than ring race of greed you know they're not looking at

Starting point is 01:13:48 some ring of power although that's essentially what it is but they're they're just they are so in love with money that it's kind of turned them into these horrific ring race and he's not even aware of it i think he doesn't even realize just how despicable his actions are perhaps um he has said in the past all rich countries should move to 100 synthetic beef why so he can get richer yeah that's why and that he is optimistic that fake meat products will be a very good alternative for consumers last Last November, Beyond Meat cut nearly 20% of its non-production workforce following plummeting sales as customers eschewed the, isn't that interesting? It looks like chew, doesn't it? But it sounds kind of like a sneeze.

Starting point is 01:14:41 Eschew his food. It's very appropriate to use that word uh his highly processed and unhealthy concoction once heavily hyped its stock that is um beyond meat has fallen more than 60 percent and an opinion piece in the new york times recently referred to lab-grown meat as, quote, the revolution that died on its way to dinner. Well, better that than the people die after they eat his dinner. That's what's typically going to happen. Such products don't offer much in the way of environmental benefits and may even be causing more harm than good. So Gates is going after cow burps he is investing in an

Starting point is 01:15:27 australian startup that's focused on preventing cows from burping methane emission they're being polite about it i don't know the cows burp that much i think they're basically they're farting here uh by feeding them a dietary supplement with a synthetic version of an ingredient in red seaweed that prohibits methane formation. So it's not even giving them red seaweed, but it's a synthetic version of red seaweed. Isn't that great? Yeah, really nutritious stuff. Gates Investment Fund said, although cows are a significant greenhouse gas source, and it, no, it doesn't matter.

Starting point is 01:16:11 It really doesn't. The methane, the CO2 doesn't matter. We shouldn't be concerned about that at all. We can talk about it to point out how hypocritical these people are. They wring their hands in despair about greenhouse gas and CO2. And then you got people like Taylor Swift that goes around the world equivalent

Starting point is 01:16:29 to seven times in one year with her private jet, even they're absolute hypocrites. So we can talk about the only reason to talk about CO2 and methane is to number one, debunk the lie and number two to point out their hypocrisy. But we shouldn't say, well, this is a better solution over here. We should never get into that. We should never assume, go with their assumptions that CO2 and methane need to be taken down.

Starting point is 01:16:57 They don't need to be taken down. That's why God gave us plants. It's a closed loop system. It adjusts. Anyway, livestock agriculture remains one of the cheapest protein sources globally, says Bill Gates. That's why he wants to get rid of it. Because if you've got cheap protein sources,

Starting point is 01:17:20 you don't need his expensive sources that are going to make him rich. If carbon really is as bad as he claims, shouldn't he be concerned about the large carbon footprint involved in developing and maintaining and disposing of AI technology? Yeah. Yeah. They never, and that's the biggest hypocrisy. It's not even the private jets and all the global meetings that these people go to.

Starting point is 01:17:48 It's artificial intelligence data centers. It's NSA data centers. It's constant biometric surveillance of everything that we do. Facial recognition. That uses a lot of energy and they don't care about that and we also know because you know when when um larry fink talks about money he tells you the truth

Starting point is 01:18:14 or at least he tells his friends at the world economic forum the truth and so you know we know that uh they don't have they're not going to be able to get enough power out of solar and wind. And it's not going to be steady state power. And so it's going to have to be something else. And it's going to require tons of it, a lot more than they've got right now. It's going to explode, as he pointed out. The emissions from the IT technology industry as a whole are expected to account for 14% of global emissions by 2040.

Starting point is 01:18:45 I think that's very low as he was talking about, you know, the explosion many, many times more than it is right now. Uh, so placing all the blame on the planet's woes on cows and glossing over the negative impact of AI on the environment. Uh,

Starting point is 01:19:02 the planet doesn't have any woes. The woes are being imposed by the globalists. We don't have a problem with global warming. We don't have a problem with CO2. We don't have a problem with methane. And anyway, the artificial intelligence does show their hypocrisy. So he says, but it all makes sense when you look at their big investments in meat alternatives and into open AI. But I don't really care about the AI's effect on the environment except for its hypocrisy. But not a day goes by now that you don't see something about genetically modifying food and that you don't see all of this

Starting point is 01:19:46 these scare tactics about um you know bird flu and what it's going to do to cows and all the rest of this stuff and it is um now at the point where the media is taken to this is the new thing today the media has taken to scolding the u.s department of agriculture which has been over the top stupid about this stuff and aggressive and trying to expand its empire it wasn't enough that the fda went out and tested milk oh we found some viral particles but don't worry nobody got sick the cows weren't sick people that consumed it weren't sick and you know we boil it and uh it breaks it up or kills it or whatever you know whether these things are alive or dead or if they even exist as we talked about yesterday so the fda said we

Starting point is 01:20:31 tested it but it's not a problem so then after that the usda goes out and starts looking at ground beef you know i kind of think it's interesting that they would look at ground beef instead of steaks right why do i say I say that? Well, because when you grind up the beef and everything, what you're doing, you're shredding it and all this kind of stuff and processing it, and it's getting exposed a lot more to the atmosphere. And you can find anything and anything if you ramp the pcr test up enough so it makes it even better if you test ground beef which has been aerated right all the all the different parts internal and everything you know you it's been exposed to the air and you can find anything in ground beef especially ramping it up

Starting point is 01:21:20 with pcr tests like that rather than looking at a stake. But even that and all the talk about how they're going to start following cattle and tagging them and banning them from going across state lines if they haven't been vaccinated and haven't been tested and all the rest of this stuff stuff we understand that game because we've been the cattle we've been there we've had as eric peters we've had the ear tag uh that they tried to put on us and we know exactly what that game is and so we know what the agenda of the u.s department of agriculture is and yet here's the new thing. We've got reporters now, various outlets are starting to criticize the U.S. Department of Agriculture for not doing enough.

Starting point is 01:22:10 Where have we seen this before? Well, we saw that as well during 2020. You had all of these organizations scolding Trump and scolding Fauci for not doing enough, giving them cover to be more aggressive. Because we all know, don't we by now, don't we understand that it's a partnership between the media and government? And so it's like, go ahead, criticize me. Go ahead, go ahead, do it. And then I'll respond to that criticism by doing more.

Starting point is 01:22:42 If I just do it on my own, it looks a little bit suspicious, right? But you criticize me. And that's what's going on right now. They're not letting up on this bird flu thing to come after our food. And everybody understands it. Like I showed at the beginning of the week, that one article that was put up on Zero Hedge, people just ranked on Zero Hedge and on E on epic times for putting that piece of propaganda and clickbait up and it was just 500 comments not a single one in agreement with any of that stuff

Starting point is 01:23:13 every single one of them mocking satirizing them condemning them for this foolishness and seeing through it. But again, we'll see what happens. Published on April 29th, a study on the CDC's website. They are so concerned about safety and purity of food, aren't they? As a matter of fact, this is a good place for me to play the... Several people have talked about what Walmart is doing now. They've gone from corn processed and canned in Arkansas to corn coming out of Thailand that has a lot of really bad stuff in it and double the calories. Here's a breakdown from one lady. So here's an older can of corn from my pantry,

Starting point is 01:24:00 and we're going to compare the two with this newer can of corn. Number one one it says that it is picked and grown on the same day. It has this green little great for you label here. Over here it says that it's from Arkansas, has 45 calories. What else is oh and it's gluten-free. Okay let's compare that to the second can. By the way, the biggest difference, the second can is a product of Thailand. Looking at the nutritional information, we went from 45 calories to 90 calories. There's more sodium, there's more carbs. Apparently it's no longer picked and packaged on the same day like this one, and it's no longer gluten-free. It also lost that great for you tag.

Starting point is 01:24:45 Let me tell you why. On this new can of corn from Walmart, there's a health warning. Let's read it. Warning, continuing to be careful we can't expose you to chemicals, including lead, which are known in the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects

Starting point is 01:25:01 or other reproductive harm. I guess that's reason enough to lose the great for you symbol that was on this can. So go into your pantry, check out your canned corn. Yeah. She said at the very beginning of that, by the way, and she just misspoke because she corrected it later, I think. She said it's got the sticker that says picked and grown on the same day. It's like what?

Starting point is 01:25:20 No, picked and canned on the same day. But not in Thailand. I guess maybe they lay it out on some lead for a couple of days before they put it in the can. Who knows? Yeah, they're so concerned about our food safety and food purity, aren't they? Where's the FDA in all this, right? Do they care that Walmart is now selling corn with lead in it? No, they don't

Starting point is 01:25:47 care. That's Walmart. You know, they were the kind of people that were essential during the lockdown. The mom and pop businesses on main street were non-essential, but Walmart was essential. And I said, one of the reasons that really graded with me was because we had been through that, uh, about, uh, 30 years earlier, 25, 30 years earlier, we had our stores and, you know, power was knocked out with a hurricane for several days. Only time that we shut the chain down and we had a snowstorm, anything else like that, I would go around, pick people up, take them to work, but nobody had power. When power came back in one area, we opened up wall street a wall wall street it was wall street walmart big wall street store right across the street the

Starting point is 01:26:31 cops came around to shut us down and so walmart's open oh yeah walmart can stay open you guys are going to shut down like oh yeah uh so yeah i've seen that whole thing before as well. April 29th, the study on the CDC's website, the abstract says infected cattle experienced non-specific illness. Well, maybe since this is supposed to be scientific, maybe you could be specific about it. If you're going to try to take stuff from us, but of course, you know, whether they're taking away your speech or they're taking away your speech or they're taking away your food they're not going to be specific about it they also had reduced feed intake and rumination and an abrupt drop in milk production we got any numbers with that an abrupt drop what

Starting point is 01:27:19 was it one percent five percent hundred percent uh tell us about that although the u.s fda has indicated the commercial milk supply remains safe the detection of influenza virus and unpasteurized bovine milk is a concern continued surveillance of bird flu is needed to prevent cross-specie and mammal-to-mammal transmission. No, it's not. Where we are right now, folks, is we're in another one of these bat soup pangolin moments here. Oh, we have zoonotic species transmission and evolution and all the rest of this stuff.

Starting point is 01:28:01 It's absolute total nonsense. And again, you know, Reuters is telling us, and this is by the gold standard, the PCR test. We've seen all of this before, and yet they are shamelessly lying to us, aren't they? They think we don't know, but we know, and we know that they know we know, and they're still going to lie to us.

Starting point is 01:28:26 I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of transparency and urgency, said an epidemiologist who was interviewed by Salon. This is why I said this is the new thing, where they come out and they criticize these agencies for not being authoritarian enough. The bureaucracy needs to do more. It needs to ban more. It needs to do this faster. I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of transparency and urgency, particularly with the USDA. So particularly with the ones who are the most aggressive, see, that's what they were saying with Fauci. I'm particularly concerned Fauci hasn't done more. They go to the person who is going to be the lead in all of this or the agency

Starting point is 01:29:06 that's going to be lead in all this and they criticize them for moving too slow because they're itching to go faster and it just doesn't seem that there's an appetite to get ahead in this salon then went on to report the notion that is now perhaps calling this bird flu. And they said, well, is this really kind of, should we start calling it cow flu now? And the expert that they got said, well, we have to make it very clear that this is not a new virus. Yeah, it's been around since 2002. It's been around since SARS was. It's not new.

Starting point is 01:29:48 It's not like COVID-19 in the October of 2019. It has existed for over 20 years. Well, again, at least they haven't recycled that part of it yet. The New York Institute of Technology told told salon calling the this the cow flu is misleading if it is only circulating around with cows then it can be called the cow flu he said well then i guess that means that bird flu is really only for birds right oh no it could jump it could jump it could jump to pangolins even though we don't have them here why not uh so they said it's also important to emphasize that it's not a definitive conclusion

Starting point is 01:30:32 uh that the cats from the cdc report yeah they said two cats that they fed raw milk to died be very afraid of raw milk they said no they No. They said, this is the epidemiologist. He said, well, the cats could have died from something else, you know, than raw milk. They could have even died from eating infected birds. We don't know. This is not a virus, however, that we want to play around with. It really confirmed that raw milk is something we don't want people to consume.

Starting point is 01:31:08 See, this one is rolling out for the benefit of big agro, like the other one rolled out for the benefit of big pharma. Yes, they really don't want people to consume raw milk. As I can imagine, another one of these conferences, like they had the Milken Institute in October, 2019, where they asked Fauci, how do we get everybody to take an untested vaccine worldwide?

Starting point is 01:31:35 We do it from the inside with disruption and we do it iteratively. Here's the iterative process. We see this every day. They iterate it, reiterate it every day, every day. They take a little bit further. And so big agro wants to shut down raw milk once and for all.

Starting point is 01:32:07 And then Big Pharma will have its turn to feed at the trough of bureaucratic bans and all the rest of the stuff because they are angling to try to vaccinate all animals. You see, since they played this herd immunity game on us, and since they injected us with poison, people are a little bit shy about this at this point in time. So now it's time to go for the actual herd, to go for the actual cattle. And why not? Because they can do them on an annual basis, just like they tell you to give your dog an annual rabies shot. Oh, you mean last year's didn't work?

Starting point is 01:32:29 Yeah. And they can do that. They can require that, or you're not going to be able to process it because they've got the monopolistic control of the processing plants. You're not going to be able to transport your cattle. You're not going to be able to transport your cattle. You're not going to be able to process your cattle. And they can get many, many times more vaccines out there into the cattle than they can into us. And that way they can still poison us by poisoning our food. I just have to put a little bit of a label on there.

Starting point is 01:33:01 Warning, this contains deadly mRNA vaccine particles in it that are going to do all kinds of things to your body but hey no problem we just remove the good for you label that's on the food they said scientists don't know what happens if someone consumes infected raw milk at the moment but it's a good sign that there haven't been any fatal cases linked to raw milk. Never. Not with this, not with anything else. And they said, even though there has been one human case of bird flu caught from cows. Here's where these people are lying a lot.

Starting point is 01:33:39 By the way, 5% of Americans drink raw milk. So if this was an issue, you'd be seeing a lot of people sick and dying, wouldn't you? But no. And this, like I mentioned before, this one person that they claim got sick had redness in their eye. One report said it was pink eye. That was it. That was it. Do you think we could live with this?

Starting point is 01:34:02 Do you think we should destroy the food supply over somebody who got red eye or conjunctivitis? As a matter of fact, that's exactly what dairy farmers are worried about. And they said it out loud. Barron's publication interviewed Dr. Joe Armstrong. He is a cattle production expert at the University of Minnesota Extension. And the article that was on Barron's headline was, Dairy farmers are still reluctant to report suspected avian flu. One expert insinuated that the regulation could soon be changed

Starting point is 01:34:40 to force farmers to slaughter their entire cattle herds if just one cow tests positive we knew this was the goal if they want to have zero bird flu well they may say you got to have zero cattle it's always this zero stuff we're going to have zero traffic deaths well that means we're going to have zero cars and we're going to have um you know zero uh cases of pcr or we're going to lock down all of shanghai and keep it locked down we've seen this how it destroyed the chinese um economy and everything else but they don't care these people like the chinese communists like mao they like to starve people to show them how powerful they are. And we're run by the same people. This is Mao's America now that we're talking about here, as Shee Van Fleet pointed out.

Starting point is 01:35:33 So Dr. Joe Armstrong, cattle expert, was asked by Barron's. Barron said, what would keep farmers from wanting to tell the authorities that they think their cows are sick? Cows aren't sick, folks. They're not sick. Nobody is sick. Nobody, nobody that none of the stuff that was tested, the cows are not sick. It's just like the other quote unquote pandemic in 2020.

Starting point is 01:35:55 Nobody was sick. It was a PCR test. Armstrong says the major reluctance when you talk to farmers is there's still too much connection to highly pathogenic avian influenza. So farmers are looking at what the USDA requires of poultry flocks when they test positive. And Behrens knows. They said, you mean that the USDA requires farmers to kill their entire poultry flock if they get a positive test? The bird doesn't have to be sick it can be only one bird

Starting point is 01:36:27 who knows what the magnification is on their pcr test but you got one bird that gets a positive kill the entire flock millions of birds killed he said uh baron says you think the farmers worry they'll be ordered to kill their cows? And Armstrong says, yeah, correct. Because we refuse to name it something else, even though it is something else. There's still too much connection. He says, after that, it's just the economics of having the USDA on your farm and trying to manage that. Imagine for these farmers, having the USDA come on their farm is like having the IRS auditor come into your house. Oh, nice house you got here. That type of thing, you know.

Starting point is 01:37:12 Where'd you get that thing? Did you report that or whatever? Barons, in addition to mandating that positive test be reported to the USDA, the new federal order also requires testing any lactating cattle before their move. I talked about that before. He says, does that go too far? He asked this guy. Listen to what the guy says.

Starting point is 01:37:32 Because they're afraid of the government. He says, that's a step in the right direction. What? That's a step in the direction of tyranny. These people are afraid of our tyrannical government. We've already gone too far, haven't we? A step in the right direction. He says, I kind of think it's a wake-up call to industry to say that unless you want the USDA dictating what happens,

Starting point is 01:37:59 you need to come up with your own plan to control this. This is like saying, censor yourself so that Google doesn't do it, or Facebook, or Twitter. Censor yourself, or we'll do it for you. How far away is that from just telling people, kill yourself or I'm going to do it, right? You know, I could make it very painful for you. I could just commit suicide.

Starting point is 01:38:23 How about that? So with all this happening, Biden has locked in regulations targeting every appliance owned by almost every household quote for too long, outdated energy efficiency standards have led to higher utility bills. Oh, well he's making high utility bills by banning our fuel, by shutting down our power plants, by giving us the most expensive kinds of energy that we can find,

Starting point is 01:38:56 wind and solar. Why do you think the Chinese and the Indians are using coal? Because it is far and away the cheapest and most reliable form of energy. So that will be banned by the Department of Energy. They finalize their regulations on Tuesday for a popular appliance that will push the market toward adopting heat pump technology. This is the same time that the Department of Energy is pushing banning everything that's not electric. At the same time, the EPA is shutting down power generation into the grid. The DOE's final energy efficiency regulations for water heaters will apply to common electrical water heaters

Starting point is 01:39:36 and significantly increase the share of those models that use heat pumps, according to the agency. It'll significantly increase the price. The Biden administration's efforts to push rules and regulations targeting appliances ranging from pool pump motors and light bulbs to furnaces and portable generators. Yeah, folks, if you want any of this kind of stuff, you better stock up now because it's going to be unbelievably expensive and inefficient if they can even build it. Because, you know, I guess we can import it from China when they build it for us. By the way, Jennifer Granholm, who's the Secretary of Energy, what does she know about any of this stuff? What does she know even about efficiency or designing any of this stuff? She's a lawyer. She's not an engineer. She's a lawyer.

Starting point is 01:40:25 She's a Harvard lawyer. She wasn't an American citizen until she was 21 years old. And then she got naturalized. So I guess you could get into government, you know, being there at Harvard. Oh, you know, you really should get naturalized so that you can, um, you know, be the energy secretary. Um, but, uh, she said almost every household has a water heater and for too long outdated energy efficiency standards have led to higher utility bills for families she said so you know you need to buy these new expensive water heaters to save money it's just like the cost benefit analysis of the warp speed vaccines or anything else but since she's not an engineer she doesn't do cost benefit analysis but you don't have to be

Starting point is 01:41:11 an engineer you just have to be an ordinary citizen to look at this and say i can't plop down all this money to save a couple of bucks it doesn't make any sense to do that. So they order people to do that. And some people are calling pure Bolshevik on this. So from this administration, we've seen them go after gas stoves, air conditioning units with regulation, refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers, now water heaters. How many more home appliances will Americans eventually have to replace then because of regulation? So just to be clear, when it comes to water heaters and uh it is uh it is uh it is proposed what has been put forward uh and if it is enacted it would not take it into effect until 2029 so let's not forget that

Starting point is 01:41:56 no yeah we got another uh four or five years so don't worry about it just kick the can down the road uh we'll take everything away from you. Power, you know, force you into electric appliances. You'll pay through the nose for these things and replace stuff that is working just fine. You know, you got a water heater. Oh, well, you need to throw that in the trash and buy a new expensive one that runs off the electric grid because we're getting ready to shut down the electric grid in five years. This is crazy. These people do not, they want to save you money.

Starting point is 01:42:30 That's the argument now. That's exactly the reason why you don't want to do this. Look, whether you're talking about canned corn or whether you're talking about appliances, these people don't care about our health. They don't care about our health. They don't care about our wealth. This is about them and their unending greed for money and for power. And that's all any of this stuff is about. We need to push back on this. I've had enough. I hope you've had enough. Let's move on to some other things. We're going to have a little bit of fun when we come back talking about some of the things that are happening just in news in general, some crazy stuff as well. But we're going to have a little bit of fun when we come back talking about some of the things that are happening just in news in general, some crazy stuff as well.

Starting point is 01:43:08 But we're going to take a break here and I'd like to get some comments from people. Travis, you can feed those back to me. I want to play a new piece that I did here. I didn't do any video cover for it, but I'm curious to see if anybody recognizes this, where it came from. So we're going to play this for you. We'll be right back. ¶¶ I'm going to go. hear news now at apsradionews.com or get the aps radio app and never miss another story all right anybody name that tune if so let us know and we'll see if anybody knows that let's talk about some news here i thought this was an amazing story Can't make this up. An emergency slide falls off the Boeing plane. We talked about that.

Starting point is 01:45:26 But it was discovered outside the home of a lawyer whose firm is suing Boeing. By the way, we just had a second whistleblower die. This one, not under as suspicious of circumstances. I'd been sick with an infection type of thing, but still, you know, the whistleblowers are dying left and right. Parts of the plane are falling off so much that the lawyer who is suing them had this emergency ramp falls down into the water outside his lakefront property, I guess. Attorney Jake Bissell-Linsk, whose firm is currently suing Boeing due to one of its planes losing a door plug during a flight in January, discovered the emergency slide from Delta Airlines Flight 520 washed ashore on some rocks outside his oceanfront home in New York

Starting point is 01:46:22 City. So there you go. I guess, like I said before, that's why they call it Boeing, because that's the noise the parts make when they fall off and hit the ground. Jeffrey Tucker talked about the ruination of plane travel. And he's somebody, I guess, who still flies frequently, and he has a lot of issues. And, of course, my wife and my daughter, who separate trips that they has a lot of issues. And of course, um, uh, my wife and my daughter who separate trips that they

Starting point is 01:46:47 took on, but both of them had issues with, uh, plane flights being delayed, canceled, things like that. Uh, and they just did, uh, you know, one trip. And, um, so, uh, okay. Mark, uh, Dora, thank you for the tip. Uh, thank you, David, for continuing to be the voice of reason. Thank you very much. I appreciate that.

Starting point is 01:47:09 Um, so, uh, Jeffrey Tucker says, you know, the best time to write about how horrible plane travel is, is when you had one of your planes, uh, scheduling disasters that happens with this. He says, um, when it doesn't happen and your flight goes well, you just don't care about it. But he says, when you're in the thick of it, as I am right now, as I'm writing this, in a 36-hour international travel time on a 19-hour delayed domestic flight that just took off. He says, yeah, when that happens to you, it feels like the apocalypse. It's more common now than I can ever remember.

Starting point is 01:47:43 I'm at the point of trying not to travel unless I have to. Because three of the five of my last trips these days seem to end up this way. So he's had five recent trips and three of them in our family, two trips and both of them. Right. Yeah, I reached my tipping point. I'm flying a long time ago, even to the extent that when we went to Washington to cover a thing, I said, I'll go, but only if I can take an extra couple of days and drive it myself. And that's what we did. We drove it.

Starting point is 01:48:20 I said, I don't want to fly. And that was in 2016 uh i hate flying i hate flying because uh but it used to just be the interference of the tsa and things like that uh now it's a real safety hazard really is he says consider the fact that you the three young women who are attempting to travel with their foo-foo fluffy dogs who who are their best friends. These dogs are well-behaved, perfectly gorgeous animals, who normally manage just fine, unless there's a problem. And when the food runs out and nature calls, it's another matter. Airports don't really provide areas for dog bathroom breaks,

Starting point is 01:48:57 so the dogs and their owners begin to panic and cry. It's a good thing it's not Kristy noms you just shoot the dog um isn't it interesting the name of her book was no no going back or something like that that's uh that was a one-way ticket out of politics for her wasn't it then you have older people and their medicines and other special needs they could be shots or otherwise require special conditions and they might not have enough medication with them and so then everything gets gets shut down for a day or whatever. He said, but the most bizarre circumstance affected my flight. He said, on landing previously, the oxygen masks suddenly fell from the ceiling.

Starting point is 01:49:38 So maintenance had to come and check that out. But of course, there is a shortage of those people. And they spend all day running from plane to plane to try to get the little lights to change from red to green. No one really understands how anything works. So you just fiddle with things until the machine tells you it works. Well, welcome to the new normal that Trump ushered in on us. Killing people and, you know, the normal of deliberately dumbed down people with these schools and all the rest of this stuff. Just show you just how stupid it all is.

Starting point is 01:50:21 This is coming out of the UK. And it's a luxury fashion brand in the UK called Jordan Luca. Let's hope that it doesn't come here because what they're selling people are pre-stained jeans that look like you just peed your pants. And of course that's what we all want, isn't it? You look at yourself in the mirror and it's like, something's just not right. It doesn't look like I've peed in my pants. And it reminds me of that joke they told about Lord Nelson. Not true or sure, but they said, yeah, there's the picture of the pants that you have peed in.

Starting point is 01:51:00 I don't know. Maybe this is a fashion trend coming from Biden or something. I guess it depends. But the joke was, they said, well, why are the British wearing red coats? And he says, well, it's because that way if we get shot, we don't see the blood. It's good for morale, that type of thing. And then the guy comes in and says, Lord Nelson, the French Navy, the bulk of it has just come around this island,

Starting point is 01:51:29 and he says, fetch me my brown pants. Maybe they're prepping us for such a moment. Everybody's got to have those pants when they break the news to us about what they're doing with the war or with the dollar or with the dollar or with the next lockdown or whatever.

Starting point is 01:51:47 Jordan Luca is a luxury fashion brand in the UK just introduced their new pre-stained jeans that look like somebody peed in them. Uh, and of course they sold out in minutes and they were selling them for $800 Canadian. That's we will never understand the world of fashion and clothing like this. It makes us really not want to understand it. Well, you know, for the longest time, people have been spending a lot of money to dress like they're poor, right?

Starting point is 01:52:22 What was it? Even Billy Joel hasn't written a song for three decades or something. You got to spend a lot of money to, uh, to, to, to dress. Uh, I can't remember the lyric now anyway. Um, uh, but you know, he was talking about how you had to spend a lot of money to look like you didn't have money. And so people have been, you know, buying more and more jeans with holes in them to look like they're rags and everything. So now I guess we can get soiled pants to look like we are poor and homeless at the same time. So I guess it fits. This is the new normal.

Starting point is 01:52:55 And as I was saying before about the Biden administration making everything more expensive, all of our appliances and everything, a new Biden energy rule will raise the cost of a new home by 31 000 no problem you know you you don't like that old inefficient home do you um let's just raise the price of housing by 31 000 it isn't like people are having any trouble buying homes now right i mean you gotta i saw the debate on reason about whether or not uh there ought to be uh limits or whatever on on uh the amount of houses that the big wall street companies can buy because they're the only ones who can afford to buy these houses now as the interest rates stay high and the price of housing continues to go up and up and up and what's driving the cost of houses up a lot of it is regulations like this just like they drive the price of cars up with regulations or the price of water heaters or your hvac all this stuff is being constantly driven up. It isn't bad enough that they print money, you know, quote, unquote.

Starting point is 01:54:08 They print regulations to do that. So, you know, they tax us with their inflation, but they also tax us with these rules, and the rules are there without representation. $31,000 added to the cost of housing to make it even more unaffordable than it is with his already bad economy. And it's kind of interesting as, as people are, you know, oh, we're going to be a friend to, uh, the average American, because we're going to stop these big wall street companies from buying up all the houses and turning everybody into.

Starting point is 01:54:41 It's like, well, your band isn't really going to stop that, which you are interfering with the marketplace by artificially inflating the price of everything. So get your rules off of us so you can buy cheaper cars and cheaper homes. If it weren't for these rules, you would have many suppliers who would go in and say, well, okay, people can't afford to buy this house. I'll make a cheaper house. No, you I'll make a cheaper house. No, you can't make a cheaper house because I've got these rules in here, and that's a floor. You can't go below that. Meanwhile, on the highways, we're going to have tens of thousands of driverless trucks.

Starting point is 01:55:20 Now, we're not talking about the battery trucks. They're working on that as well, and that's also a big issue. And that's an issue of practicality as well as something of a hazard. But that's a separate issue, the EV stuff. They're pushing out these self-driving cars, quote-unquote self-driving. They're pushing these things out even with the diesel engines there. The key is they want to get rid of the humans who are driving the cars. And they want to put chat GPT in charge of driving these massive semis here.

Starting point is 01:55:58 So, again, this is tens of thousands of fully autonomous tractor trailers expected to haul freight on public roads in upcoming years. The plans are in place to begin with 20 driverless trucks in Texas in 2024. So nobody behind the wheel of these 18 wheelers. That's a great idea, isn't it? With 25 lasers, radar, and camera sensors, the truck can see. Are you impressed with that? I'm not impressed with it. It can see obstacles on the road from a quarter mile out and then switch to an unobstructed lane without any instruction or manipulation from a human.

Starting point is 01:56:45 Can it look to see if there's somebody in that lane accurately? Within three or four years, Aurora and its competitors expect to put thousands of self-driving trucks on America's public freeways and put thousands of drivers out of work. That's their goal. Everywhere you look, this is what the goal is. The goal is to make everything unaffordable. The goal is to put us out of work. They're going to make our, gradually, iteratively,

Starting point is 01:57:15 make our food unaffordable, our homes, our appliances, gradually replace our jobs. And they've been talking about this for a long time. For 15 years, I've been talking about, hey, their schemes are to put us out of work and they want to condition us with universal basic income. That was another thing that made me so angry about Donald Trump. I knew that.

Starting point is 01:57:40 Oh, you're not essential. We got to keep the Wall Street companies here, however. And that's always been the plan. Always been the plan to replace workers. While the technology makes advances, the average American's mindset toward an 80,000-pound truck driving 65 miles per hour down superhighways may not be one of acceptance just yet. According to AAA's latest survey on the subject, most U.S. drivers express fear, yeah, or uncertainty about fully driverless vehicles. Two-thirds of them are afraid of them, and rightfully so.

Starting point is 01:58:32 It isn't as if we've seen a perfect record from these other cars, is it? I mean, now we've got, uh, Ford, um, being called in for an investigation for their driverless cars. We've seen it with Ford, Cruz, Waymo, Tesla, all of them. And so we're going to fail up. We're going to continue to, you know, if we got problems with battery fires, well, then we go from the phones that were catching fire to the laptops. We go from laptops to the electric bikes. We go from that to the cars. And then we go to the buses and now the tractor trailers. And then we have the battery energy storage sites where we have massive

Starting point is 01:59:02 collections of batteries to do backup for solar and wind that are already expensive. And each one of these things is a ticking time bomb to start a fire. And it's the same thing with the driverless side of this. Safety advocates have also been pointing out that almost no federal regulation is currently on the books for autonomous cars and trucks. Isn't that interesting? You know, the feds love to regulate everything.

Starting point is 01:59:29 They love to regulate our dishwashers. They all regulate our hot water heaters and everything, but they don't want to regulate the autonomous cars and trucks. Why is that? Seems to me like it'd be, you know, exactly the type of thing that your bureaucracy would want to expand into. I mean, look at all the new people you could hire. You could build your little empire. They're regulating these autonomous cars and trucks. Why is it that they have absolutely no interest in regulating

Starting point is 01:59:53 them? Well, for the same reason, they have absolutely no interest in regulating vaccines or other pharmaceutical products for that matter, of course, because they're captured because they're partners, because they're just looking at how they can make money. And hey, if it kills a bunch of us, that's all the better. So as of now, it's to the developers to determine if the vehicles are safe, just like when Children's Health Defense called up the CDC and said, you know, they're pegylating these particles in the mRNA. Do you realize that a lot of people are going to go into shock with this? Anaphylactic shock? Oh, well, you know, says the CDC and the FDA.

Starting point is 02:00:35 Call Pfizer and tell them that. We don't care. And Pfizer didn't care either when they called them. If we put a vehicle on the road that isn't sufficiently safe, that we aren't confident in the safety of, then it kills everything else, says the CEO of Aurora. Well, let's hope that it does. But so far it hasn't.

Starting point is 02:00:56 Like I said before, we've had Waymo, we've had Cruise, both of them in San Francisco. We've had a lot of these things, but it hasn't slowed this down at all. They just keep making bigger and bigger things that are self-driving and bigger and bigger things that have more and more batteries that can catch fire. Just one of those batteries catch fire, and it's a chain reaction. And so we had four police officers killed in Charlotte after they went to serve a warrant on an armed felon. Wait a minute. He's got multiple felony convictions, and he's a fugitive, and he's not allowed to have a gun.

Starting point is 02:01:36 So I guess it'd be safe to serve a warrant on him because, you know, it's against the law for this guy to own a gun. So he won't have a gun, right? Except that he did because he didn't care about that law anymore than he cared about the other laws that they were coming after him for. He was banned from buying and possessing guns as a felon, but he didn't care. So Biden is making a big deal out of this. He's trying to ramp this up so he can call for gun control. So he's pretending to care about the murder of four police officers isn't

Starting point is 02:02:05 that interesting he doesn't care when the police officers are murdered by his um his mob marching millions his million man migrants that's what you should call the million migrant march is uh what we've got here except it's several million that are coming in if something like that happens or you got somebody, you know, some young girl is raped and killed, he doesn't care about that. Won't even mention it. But he wants to be Johnny on the spot because he wants to come after guns. So Biden called on Congress to impose a national red flag law

Starting point is 02:02:39 as well as federal storage mandates for firearms. Do you think that would stop this? This is a guy who's got multiple felony convictions. Would that be a red flag? And there's already laws against him having a gun, so we need to have national red flag laws? Do you think maybe if we have a storage mandate for firearms, oh, that would have stopped him?

Starting point is 02:03:04 Yeah, this felon who's not allowed to have guns would have put his gun safely into a storage thing so that he would not have shot at the police. Right now, he's just trying to build public support for doing his gun control by executive order. That is really what he's up to. So meet the lifelong felon who killed four cops in North Carolina. This is from Zero Hedge. They said, you know, he's got a long rap sheet.

Starting point is 02:03:41 He was barred from owning or possessing any firearms and so then he i guess took him out of his safe storage that he had and he ambushed a u.s marshal's fugitive task force so he's also a fugitive police officers uh there as they were serving a warrant three u.s marshals three and an officer from the charlotteMecklenburg Police Department were killed in a shootout. And four police officers and one marshal were injured. So he wounded five people, killed four. All law enforcement. So I guess, you know, we need to have more gun control laws.

Starting point is 02:04:22 That'll solve it. As Zahra Hedge says, has the leftist corporate media identified the felon? Well, no, because it doesn't fit the narrative. CNN hasn't talked about it. Fox news has not talked about it either. According to the police, us marshals attempted to serve him a warrant for firearm possession uh he was also wanted for two counts of felony flight to try to get out of the charlotte area yeah i guess i didn't see that coming um i've got some comments about the music

Starting point is 02:04:58 guard goldsmith john williams you got that right yeah you got that right and john madison uh the 1984 olympics you got that right that Yeah, you got that right. And John Madison, the 1984 Olympics, you got that right. That's what it's from. Yeah, that's the Olympic fanfare in March. I guess the March part of it or something like that. Well, again, I was wondering if anybody would recognize that. I don't watch the Olympics, but I think they play it on a pretty regular basis. But I think it was the 1984 Olympics.

Starting point is 02:05:23 I think you're right. I think it was, uh, it was the ones that they had, the one they had in LA. Uh, because the people in LA knew how good John Williams was. So they get them to do their own one big thing. And it was so good. I think they've, they've kept it, uh, every, every time since then, uh, regarding the pee pants, atomic dog says says, pee-stained pants. Now you can cultivate the homeless look before the government actually makes you homeless. There we go.

Starting point is 02:05:50 See, that's it. It's cool to be poor and homeless, and so we take the shame away from it. That's what I guess they're trying to do. And Travis tells me that page six on the news is reporting that the son of Fox News, Brett Baer, had to have emergency open heart surgery for a golf ball-sized aneurysm. His son is 16. I wonder if he took the jab. You know, we just had a football player who was only retired like a couple of years.

Starting point is 02:06:21 He's still in his late 20s. He died suddenly with this stuff. And of course, you know, they're bragging about the fact they're forcing everybody to get the vaccine in the NFL. Aaron Rogers famously pushed back against it. But yeah, we're going to talk about that and what's going on with AstraZeneca as well. But 13 reasons why AR-15s should never be banned. This is by unitedliberty.com. There's a lot of confusion, misinformation about the AR-15. Some people believe it's dangerous and deadly weapon,

Starting point is 02:06:57 has no place in civilian hands. As a matter of fact, when you look at these people on TV, they all treat it as if, you know, well, somebody's got the ar-15 there's absolutely no way you can stop them but of course we saw one shooter who did have an ar-15 was taken down by a guy with a revolver and uh so this whole idea to demonize a particular type of firearm uh call it an assault weapon because it scares them i guess it says just seeing it it's like an assault the reality is the ar-15 is versatile reliable popular with gun enthusiasts

Starting point is 02:07:31 for a variety of reasons um first of all they said in spite of what the liberals seem to think it is not automatic secondly it is very commonly used. It is commonly used and widely owned. It is useful for hunting, unlike the narratives that you hear from Joe Biden. I remember years ago, he was trying to push smart guns when he was vice president. That was going to be his initiative that he was going to own, his little carve-out. And you remember, because we played it a lot you know ladies don't get an ar-15 get a shotgun you know over and under or side by side or something like that and um so people put up uh pictures of women who were shooting a shotgun that had never shot a shotgun before they didn't realize they needed to put the stock against their arms so they're obviously uh you know newbies and all this stuff or whatever but it knocking them flat and um and

Starting point is 02:08:30 then they would show uh women shooting an ar-15 because it's got very little recoil uh sport shooting is also something people use it for uh but going back to the hunting thing you know joe biden also putting out this idea uh why do, are the deer wearing a bulletproof vest or something? What do you need that AR-15 for? And it's like, well, if it's a bulletproof vest, I ain't taking the deer down anyway with any of this stuff. Useful also for self-defense for many of these same reasons. It's an educational tool, let me point out, because it is easily customized. So it's a good platform for teaching gunsmithing and firearm modification, which the ATF really hates.

Starting point is 02:09:15 Precision is very good. Again, it's customizable. They already had that in there before, but it's got a lot of safety features that you might not have on some other rifles. It has a big economic impact for the firearms industry because so many people buy and own them. It is of historical significance. I did not realize that this has been in production since the 1960s. I guess it took a while for it to catch on, but it's been around for quite some time. And I think a lot of people think, and a lot of leftists think the AR is for automatic rifle or something,

Starting point is 02:09:55 but it's not. It's arm of light. It's range of use for civilian sports shooting, for hunting, and all the rest of the stuff. And here's number 13. It's a constitutional right. that's the one that matters of course i guess they could put in 14 according to christy gnome it's great for shooting dogs but uh we won't joke about that i mean what did what an idiot i mean does she not remember how mitt romney got harang ring for putting a dog talking about how he had put a dog

Starting point is 02:10:26 on the top of his station wagon or something. I forget the details over there were moving or something like that. And everybody always, what, what did she think? I want to put something like that in there. Absolutely tone deaf and stupid. Um, Texas detective says turning off your phone means that you're either the victim of a crime or you're probably in the process of committing one yeah because I guess if you don't want big brother watching you just like in

Starting point is 02:10:56 1984 you know if you are trying to sneak around the corner so the big brother camera can't see what you're doing you must be doing something wrong and that's what he said this is a guy who evidently I don't So the big brother camera can't see what you're doing. You must be doing something wrong. And that's what he said. This is a guy who evidently I don't follow the crime blog stuff, but evidently the case of Mo Wilson, who was a cyclist and she was killed by Caitlin Armstrong. It was just convicted and sentenced to 90 years in prison.

Starting point is 02:11:27 The detective was interviewed on CBS news. So when compiling the evidence and piecing together the string of events to determine who the murderer was, how, when, and why it was committed. Apparently one of the tip offs was the murderer lied about her phone's battery dying the night Armstrong carried out the murder. Isn't it interesting how all these detectives are conspiracy theorists in a sense, right? They have an idea as to how the crime was committed, and then they look to see if that really was it. But they come up with these theories about what happened,

Starting point is 02:11:58 and that's the basis of their investigation. But you're not supposed to do that with the government either. However, this was not found to be true. And the phone had been deliberately turned off. And this was a red flag for the detectives making the statements that in this day and age, if someone turns off their phone or takes it off of a network, then it most likely means that the person is a victim of a crime or a criminal themselves have they never heard of people putting their phone in airplane mode so they can they don't get bothered with the radiation

Starting point is 02:12:34 while they're sleeping seriously I guess we have to be asleep if we don't see the surveillance state coming these people are moving it in every direction that now you're either a victim or you are committing a crime if you don't see the surveillance state coming, these people are moving it in every direction that now, uh, you're either a victim or you are committing a crime. If you don't have your phone on, it should be constantly reporting to these people. I mentioned earlier that Ford is getting into trouble with their self-driving, um, thing they call blue cruise. But yeah, let's, uh, go ahead and open up the gates for these um semi-trailers uh there have been two fatal crashes with a blue cruise uh the uh the is a driver assistance system and they've already had two separate fatal crashes both of them occurring at night. But wait a minute, don't they have

Starting point is 02:13:26 radar and laser and all the rest of this stuff? Remember when that self-driving car that was, I think it was an Uber car, they were practicing with it in Phoenix. And there was a homeless woman who was jaywalking, and you see it's got a camera looking forward, and it's got a camera looking at the human driver who was not doing anything other than sitting there playing with a phone, playing a game or something with a phone, until the bump bump of running over the jaywalking homeless person, and they put that out, and their first excuse was,

Starting point is 02:14:03 well, you can see this person. You couldn't see him. And as soon as they came into the headlights, that was too late. And everybody said, well, wait a minute. It doesn't navigate with visual light. It's got LiDAR and all these other things there. It should have seen that, seen her coming, and it should have applied the brakes. Why didn't it do

Starting point is 02:14:25 that and then as people continue to ask questions it comes out that they had problems with the emergency braking kicking on and so they just disabled it because it wasn't functioning right so yeah uh the crashes at night that killed two separate crashes that killed two different people with the blue cruise driver assist uh it was introduced in 2021 it's supposed to offer hands-free driving assistance on pre-mapped divided highways unlike tesla's autopilot blue Cruise has a more restricted operational design domain. They call that odd. I think it is odd. Anyway, that's the acronym. Incorporates an infrared driver monitoring system to ensure drivers keep their eyes on the road. Except it doesn't always

Starting point is 02:15:20 work as advertised like most of this stuff and then finally here um how robots making your burgers and fries can lead to greater income inequality now this is from the la times this is an article that's picked up by drudge so you can imagine that it's got kind of a a leftist tilt to it in some regards but it is interesting because uh they understand as i was saying that gavin newsom's minimum wage law was really about putting robots in these fast food restaurant chains you know it used to be that uh when i was growing up we had kids in high school i mentioned it i that i worked a little bit at red Lobster, but I had other jobs. But I mentioned it when Red Lobster was going out of business. But all the kids that I knew in high school, we all had jobs. And we used those jobs to buy cars,

Starting point is 02:16:15 because that was our ticket to ride, our ticket for freedom. And yet, what do we see now? For the longest time, the entry-level jobs like working at a fast food place or something like that have gone to illegal immigrants who come in and they're uh content to i guess work at these fast food jobs for the rest of their life you know something that was typically just viewed to be in uh a um entry-level thing and now it's become something that people do and and and continue to do that they don't um uh they don't move on to some other job it's not just something that high school kids are doing and now we see that that is moving and being replaced those people are being replaced the cheap labor that these corporations want that's's why they opened up the border. They want to get people coming in.

Starting point is 02:17:11 That even though it's very cheap compared to what Americans are thinking, it is much more than they were making in the country where they came from. But now those people are going to be pushed out by robots. And this has been the progression that we've seen for a long time, seen this coming. And so then what do those people do when they're pushed out of this job with robots? So now, you know, high school kids are not getting any work experience or work ethic. They're not getting cars, independence. Instead, we're going to have robots. And that's what this is about, how robots making your burgers and fries can lead to greater income inequality and just keep people

Starting point is 02:17:47 from having any uh upward mobility at all on april the first wasn't interesting that newsome did this on april fool's day raising significantly raising you know by 30 percent um one-third they went from 15 an hour to 20 an hour just for the fast food chains that are national because he's trying to push them and goad them into making the economic decision to use robots in the kitchen and we see now a lot of different robots that have uh the manual dexterity and the smarts to be able to do i showed you one one the other day. It was chopping up food. It was flipping pancakes in the pan, opening bottles and things like that. And so they're at the point now where they can start replacing some of the labor and

Starting point is 02:18:35 he wants to give them a financial incentive to do that because that's what he's really concerned about helping. He's not concerned about helping the people that are at the bottom who are working in fast food. He wants to help the Silicon Valley companies sell robots. And so in April, the Fools, more than half a million fast food workers in California got a raise up to $20 an hour. That same week, the self-proclaimed world's first autonomous restaurant

Starting point is 02:19:03 opened its doors for business in Pasadena. So, yeah, he's not trying to help people at the bottom. He's trying to help the elites up at the top, the technocrats. Fast food franchise owners are struggling to stay afloat amid rising labor costs because he's jacking them up, leading many of them to consider automation as the only viable solution. That's why he's pushing the big chains. He said, if this is a chain, even if you don't own 80 stores, even if you're a franchisee and you got three or four stores, if you're a McDonald's franchisee where they got more than 80 stores worldwide, then you're going to be covered by this. To make sure that McDonald's is going to come up with some kind of a robot program

Starting point is 02:19:48 that everybody will be forced to buy into. This person says, I studied low-wage industries in LA, including the effects of new technology and workers. My research shows how automation does not always lead to greater efficiency and cost-cutting for businesses, as AI boosters would like the public and policymakers to believe. No, it actually makes more money for the people who are selling robots, uh, this kind and they don't sell them. They're going to rent them. Okay.

Starting point is 02:20:17 Cause that's the key to really getting wealthy, not selling something, but leasing it so that you will never own anything. That is a big part of the new normal for them. This kind of innovation also promises to further income inequality. Working people deserve to have their voices heard in determining how, where, when, or whether AI and automation should be used. This person is writing from the perspective that the unions are going to fix this for us. We'll talk about that in a moment here. I was eager to visit Cali Express, the new roboticized Pasadena restaurant, to learn what the future of fast food looked and tasted like. Outside, there were slogans befitting a traveling circus. AI frying robot marvel. It's not a flying robot. That's what my son wanted when he was

Starting point is 02:21:10 little. He didn't watch TV much at all. And so we asked him when he was little, he said, what do you want for Christmas? And he said, I want a flying robot. I said, what else do you want? But if he could imagine it, thought he could uh get it uh

Starting point is 02:21:28 ai frying robot marvel yeah it's the same son another story we go to a restaurant chinese restaurant we used to go there all there's a local restaurant um small local restaurant and um and you know he was um maybe about four years old or something and and um he liked to wear his batman costume and we'd let him wear it anywhere you know we didn't care it's like you want to go grocery shopping with batman sure so he let him wear it to the restaurant because he wanted to and um so he's sitting there and and the waiter who was chinese came over and he goes you're gonna fry and he says what is you're gonna fry and he looks at us and he says i don't know what he's saying

Starting point is 02:22:16 it was anyway it's um so they have an ai frying robot marvel So I don't know if it's flying or frying, but anyway, my curiosity peaked. I entered and passed by a facial recognition scanner advertising the ominous sounding opportunity to pay with your face. Isn't that great? You can pay with your face. So, yeah, that's basically what you're doing on social media you know you're paying with your face for facebook uh the dumb effers as uh he said the dumb facebookers is what he was calling them actually right uh but the you pay with your face you pay with your privacy you pay dearly to use those social media things.

Starting point is 02:23:06 Anyway, he says, I went through and I placed my order on a giant touchscreen, watched a human worker spring into action behind the counter. They rushed to load up robots with raw beef and frozen fries, and they scrambled around the kitchen, retrieving cooked items that the robots had deposited in the buckets. Then this person manually assembled, packaged, and delivered the food to waiting customers. A second worker cleaned up after the robots.

Starting point is 02:23:36 Oh, there you go. Isn't that great? Sounds like really fulfilling work, doesn't it? I mean, you know, cooking, you know, short order cook or whatever, cooking this stuff, that's not really a challenging thing necessarily. But, you know, certainly does beat just having to be the person who keeps stacking the frozen fries into the end of the robot area. As all this is happening, an animatronic arm put on a show reminiscent of a kooky science fair

Starting point is 02:24:08 project hastily dunking a fry basket into a vat of hot oil the workers toiled away in the background doing the majority of the work see that's the key thing that i thought was interesting about this just like the walkout store just walkout stores of amazon right he said there's a lot of smoke mirror and fraud involved in a lot of this stuff you know jeff bezos didn't have some magical technology there kind of a dog and pony show like what tesla was pulling himself nikola tesla, 120 years ago with his little remote control robot. Yeah, just talk to it, ask it questions and it'll blink back the answers to you.

Starting point is 02:24:52 He had somebody with a remote control. They'd never seen a remote control. They didn't know what was going on with it, but they were very impressed. And so that was kind of, you know, what Jeff Bezos and Amazon Whole Foods were doing with their just walkout stores. They had 1,000 Indians watching people shop and totaling it up and then pretending that it was all automated. Yeah, I had one little Indian, 10 little Indians, 1,000 little Indian shoppers there. He says the lofty promises of new tech can be used as a pretense for restructuring industries and infrastructure often at the expense of workers, consumers, and the community.

Starting point is 02:25:36 And again, it's because the only concern is the wealth for the very, very few. He says, not only is this not a great deal for the workers, but he says consumers end up paying more for less, as automation requires high levels of standardization. In fast food, what this means is smaller menus and not as much minimal customization. Food prices will continue to skyrocket, just as they have over the last decade,

Starting point is 02:26:05 far outpacing the rate of inflation and boosting corporate profits to unprecedented new heights. He said, my order at Cali Express, he just ordered a burger and a fries, and that was the extent of their menu. No Coke, Pepsi, right? That type of thing. It came out to $15.44,

Starting point is 02:26:28 which is more than double the same order at In-N-Out Burgers, where they can make it a lot of different ways because you're dealing with people. As profits boom for these multinational conglomerates, local franchisees may feel pressured by the franchise company to automate. But to fully renovate a commercial kitchen requires enormous and risky capital investment, plunging already struggling small businesses into new debt.

Starting point is 02:26:57 So who actually gains from all of this stuff? The new class of techno middlemen who are going to lease the hardware and they're going to have subscription based software because you will own nothing. Even the people who are the business owners who have the franchises and things like that, they won't own this stuff. They'll be leasing it from the big guys. You know, they have known for the longest longest time that's the way to make money. We had, as I've said before, we had video stores.

Starting point is 02:27:32 We opened up in 1986. And then when they started pushing for control, the movie studios wanted to get control. And, of course, the key ones to push for that control was Paramount, who summed to Redstone, who owned Viacom. Viacom was a holding company for that control, uh, was paramount who summed a Redstone who owned Viacom Viacom was a holding company for paramount, but they also bought blockbuster. Okay.

Starting point is 02:27:52 And, um, so, uh, you know, Viacom owned a lot of different things, CBS, paramount, blockbuster, a lot of those things. And so, um, they wanted to establish all the movie studios wanted to establish a situation where they never gave up ownership of the movies. They always just rented them. And so they wanted to have a pay-per-view rental thing where they put the stuff there. And it made it very difficult for anybody to make money off of it if they bought into that situation but they use the the pressure and the financial um clout of paramount uh to push that even though blockbuster never made any money off of that blockbuster after paramount took it it was profitable before

Starting point is 02:28:38 they bought it but after it was bought by viacom never never made any money. I just saw the other day that now Sumner Redstone, who was the CEO at the time, he's died and his daughter is there. But Paramount's gone out of business now. And other movie studios are having a lot of problems as well. You know, Warner Brothers is having a lot of problems. But they wanted to drive everybody out of business. They wanted to make sure that they got all of the money, which is what they do with, uh, with the movie theaters as well, but they're putting out of business as well.

Starting point is 02:29:16 You know, you look at the movie theaters, the only way they can make any money is off of selling popcorn and concession stands, uh, because they take almost all the ticket price and they keep all that money for themselves and they don't own the movie they just rent it for a short period of time and so they are allowed to um you know they have a deal set up with them they don't even own the posters and the standees that they put in a lobby about the the movies that all goes back to the studios. Truly, it's amazing. It's about total control.

Starting point is 02:29:50 And that's the way these multinational corporations, these large Wall Street corporations, that's the way they operate. They don't want you to own anything. And you look at the software models of Adobe and other ones, how they don't want to sell it anymore. They want you to rent it constantly from them. It's a leasing agreement. The companies developing the technology have raised billions of dollars to impose their solutions, quote-unquote, onto the unwitting public.

Starting point is 02:30:15 And how do they do that? Typically with the help of the government partnering with them, banning what their competitors are doing or banning what has always been out there, you know, just like we're talking about with food, with meat, and other things like that. This is what the technocracy wants. Now, up to this point, I'm pretty much in agreement, and this is where we go our separate ways with this article,

Starting point is 02:30:38 because he thinks that, fortunately, California has a reputation for taking bold policy action. So this guy sees the California government as having a solution to all this and the California government as being the ally of the little guy. Nothing could be further from the truth. They said they are established the state's first sectoral bargaining councils. So are the unions going to save us, or are they just another layer of parasites and cronyism? And it's this partnership between government and the corporations

Starting point is 02:31:17 that is really dangerous. Newsom's recent executive order. This guy likes this. It's an executive order mandating AI-powered overhaul of state government operations and public services is one example. Yeah, so he's going to fix this. He's going to use AI for state government operations and public services, which is another one of the plans of the technocracy. It's what Bill Gates has always been pushing. In India with the Aadhaar system.

Starting point is 02:31:47 Let me help you to impose an ID on all the citizens. We've seen it there in India, the Aadhaar system. We've seen Ukraine talking about how, yeah, when the war is over, we're going to have anything that you do with the government, you're going to have to have, it's going to be so convenient. You're going to love this. We're going to have this digital ID and an app. And so instead of having to go stand in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles, you just use your app and you're all done. Except they're going to be taking away your ability to drive and everything else. They're going to be surveilling you everywhere you go.

Starting point is 02:32:24 They're going to require an ID. So this is how we get suckered into these things. Again, this is an LA Times opinion piece. So it was interesting until the very end, at which point he absolutely goes off the rails. We'll be right back. Whether you're feeling like the blues or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered.

Starting point is 02:32:48 Check out a wide variety of channels on our app at APSradio.com. so You're listening to the david knight show all right welcome back let's talk a little bit about the pharma uh issue and um we've had some developments from big pharmaceutical companies johnson and johnson is now proposing to pay $6.5 billion to resolve almost all of the ovarian cancer lawsuits based on people who use their baby powder. And it's not just ovarian cancer. Of course, there are respiratory issues as well with that. The key thing is that with this talcum powder, they knew for a very long time about this. And they continued to advertise it anyway. And then after it became more prevalent, they stopped the advertising.

Starting point is 02:34:37 But they continued to sell it. Kind of the same type of thing they did with opioids. And, of course, we know about the Sackler family and Purdue pharmaceutical and how much money they made and how ruthless the marketing of that was everywhere. And yet, um, they were actually using Johnson and Johnson to manufacture it for them.

Starting point is 02:34:57 That's why I said, you know, when Trump brought them in, in 2020, I said, you realize the history of the, this company, of course,

Starting point is 02:35:04 you know, most of them have got a long list of criminal lawsuits and charges against them, just like the banks do. But it was almost as if Trump had come in with Johnson & Johnson. He's like, I know you've got these problems with the opioid stuff, and you've got problems with the baby powder stuff. How about we get you into a I know you got these problems with the opioid stuff and you got problems with the baby powder stuff. How about we get you into a business where you got no liability?

Starting point is 02:35:30 I can set you up with vaccines. And they did. They got them allied with another small vaccine company. They turned over factories to them. We've seen this type of thing before as well. talked about it with chobani yogurt you know this guy comes in and chuck schumer and kristin gilbrand get him a factory in new york to make yogurt isn't that nice when you got friends in the federal government they can just give you factories at discount prices like that set you up in business what do they want in return well in his particular case it was immigration based but uh going back to this the subsidiary of johnson and johnson is

Starting point is 02:36:12 proposing to pay nearly six and a half billion dollars to resolve nearly all the talc ovarian cancer lawsuits brought against the company they said it would resolve about 99.75 percent of the pending lawsuits brought against it and its affiliates over the allegations. It also announced in 2022 that it would stop selling its talc-based baby powder in 2023 amid the ongoing legal battles over the product. Think about that. I mean, for decades, they continued to do it. And then when they finally come out and say in 2022, well, we'll stop selling it a year from now, a year from now. Isn't that amazing that they continued to do it that long? Isn't it amazing that somebody would continue to market and sell some kind of a health product long after the harm was known. Does that sound familiar? Is that what's going on with all the vaccines?

Starting point is 02:37:08 As a matter of fact, we look at what is happening in Canada and the UK. They're now, it's to the point where the harm has now been shown and has come out. In both Canada and the UK, however, it's about AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca evidently was not as well connected politically as Pfizer-Moderna. This was the AstraZeneca vaccine was the one that came out of the UK. AstraZeneca was a company and they partnered with Oxford university to put this thing out. And, um,

Starting point is 02:37:47 they never allowed it in the United States, not because they were concerned about safety. Of course, uh, just, they didn't have a political constituency here. Uh, but,

Starting point is 02:37:58 uh, it was pretty obviously, um, not a, uh, safe vaccine. And they just didn't have the political clout to keep that thing going so they shut it down in most countries eventually and now you've got canada and the uk

Starting point is 02:38:13 looking at people who were harmed by this astrazeneca vaccine they have admitted it now in court that uh that harmed people and could kill and was killing people. Uh, but still they're dragging their feet on any compensation. Canada's COVID vaccine injury program so far has only paid out 6% of the claims. So far. So that's like one out of every 17 claims and they're not paying much money either. Only 138 of the 2,233 claims made so far have been approved for payout. And the amounts that they're paying people are paltry sums. Trudeau, as a matter of fact, recently tabled a 2024 budget that earmarked an extra $36 million for the program.

Starting point is 02:39:02 He doesn't want to pay people for the vaccine that he pushed people pushed on people isn't that amazing some people who are successful in getting payouts have said that the compensation awarded was insufficient considering the injuries 42 year old ross reitman from white man from the from british columbia had a lawsuit against AstraZeneca and the federal government of Canada and the government of his province and the pharmacy at which he was injected. But he's not getting much of anything from any of them. He received the AstraZeneca shot in April of 2021. Shortly after that, he became totally paralyzed.

Starting point is 02:39:43 He was subsequently diagnosed with Guillain-Barre syndrome. This has been a very long-known side effect of many different vaccines. Going back to the 1970s when they had the swine flu and that fake pandemic of the swine flu and the vaccine that harmed so many people. Remember, we had the 60 Minutes thing by Mike Wallace, Chris Wallace's father. And, um, the person, one of the key people that he interviewed in that had been paralyzed with Guillain brace and Roman was gradually getting back use of her legs, but she was

Starting point is 02:40:21 never going to be able to do anything other than walk with, um, braces and things like that. This has been around for a long time, but we've never seen it to the extent that we saw it in this. So we've had all of these typical vaccine injuries, but far, far worse than we'd ever seen it before. Plus all of the new types of injuries. Whitman was given a one-time payout of 250 000 and about 90 000 a year in income replacement that's going to be eaten up with inflation given the extent of the permanent

Starting point is 02:40:53 life-changing injuries a couple hundred thousand dollars isn't much he says that's for sure the federal government is also the canadian federal government is also, the Canadian federal government, is also continuing to purchase COVID shots. Isn't that amazing? Continuing to purchase them, even though nobody wants the boosters anymore. And this is something else that we've seen over and over again. They continue to buy this stuff. And they continue to buy, we and they continue to buy. Uh, we see this, we saw this in Australia.

Starting point is 02:41:32 Um, it is also the case in other countries that they buy 10 times the case that what people are complaining about with, uh, Ursula fond of lying and the EU, she bought 10 times the doses of vaccine as the population, just like they did in Australia. It's like they're planning and we reported this when it happened. I reported it when it happened. We had said, think about how many of these shots they want to get people. They're buying 10 times the number of people that they've got. They're not going to hit you just one or two times.

Starting point is 02:42:02 The UK government, again, caught playing hardball over the vaccine injury payouts as the victims' legal bills mount. And again, this is AstraZeneca. And this is another 40-something father who was young, healthy, had a family, was supporting them, working, fighting for their lives, and having life-altering injuries. Jamie Scott is nothing if not a fighter. He must be to have survived a reaction to his Trump shot, so violent that hospital doctors phoned his wife three times to tell her

Starting point is 02:42:36 to get to his bedside because he was about to die. But each time he pulled through, actually, this is not a Trump shot. This is the AstraZeneca shot. Fit and healthy before the jab the 47 year old father of two has suffered a permanent brain injury that prevents him from working or even being able to look after his children on his own for anything more than an hour the battle to stay alive was won however it was just the beginning he is now uh struggling to do anything in his um

Starting point is 02:43:09 in his life and um so uh hang on a second just uh lost my spot here and uh i i haven't got this memorized so i wanted to read this next section to you and i'm having trouble finding it here. Maybe we should play some music here. Anyway, this week, AstraZeneca has confirmed a couple of things. First one is that they're going to pay their CEO 18.7 million pounds in compensation. And the UK Telegraph obtained court documents that showed the pharmaceutical firm was admitting for the first time in legal proceedings that its vaccine can quote in very rare cases.

Starting point is 02:43:57 No, they got that. That's a Fauci thing. It's rare. You know, it's rare and very rare cases. It can cause an illness, which is fatal about 20% of the time. So once you get this illness, it is not rare to die from it.

Starting point is 02:44:10 When its symptoms of blood clots and low blood plate counts are not deadly, it leaves the victims with devastating injuries. In these same legal documents, AstraZeneca accepts that it has no idea why the vaccine, developed in conjunction with the University of Oxford, has no idea why the vaccine should do that. Well, see, this is why we have tests, right? This is why they would go through three phases of testing, so that you would know if it was harmful and so that you would know that it was actually causing this problem. But they did it at warp speed because they skipped the testing.

Starting point is 02:44:51 They said the causal mechanism is not known, said the company. Well, I think we do know the cause of all this. I think this is caused by politicians, don't you? I mean, I don't have to go with a, I have to get a microscope to figure out this is caused by politicians who force this on us and if we know anything at all about history and documents and what these people have been doing for the last 20 plus years we know exactly why they did this it was politicians who did this uh, no doubt about it on rumble.

Starting point is 02:45:27 Foggy trail says I've been posting about vaccines for over 15 years. Yeah. And my in-laws thought I was nuts. They still think I'm crazy. Even though several of them have helped issues from the COVID jab. That's a shame. You just can't get through to people like that. Uh,

Starting point is 02:45:45 on rumble, Michael DeSilvio, my coworker vomited and lost control of his bowels. As soon as he was jabbed later that night, he had a stroke. That's it. It's just, and,

Starting point is 02:45:57 and it's covered up in it, right? It's covered up. They wanted everybody to believe that this is unrelated, that it was a fluke that this wasn't happening to anybody else this is why when we look at freedom of speech it's not just an abstract thing it is fundamental it is the way that we defeat this tyranny is with freedom of speech and being able to talk to and communicate with each other. That's why that is the key thing they want to shut down.

Starting point is 02:46:25 And it's why it's such a betrayal what Mike Johnson and these other people are doing. To take these riots that are happening and say, well, they've had too much to say. We've got to shut down what people say. You've had too much to think. You've had too much to say. I'm not going to let you talk about this stuff anymore. So the legal mess has been made more complicated in the UK because the government indemnified AstraZeneca.

Starting point is 02:46:55 In other words, they got immunity. The people they jabbed didn't get immunity, but they got legal immunity for the harm that they caused. So it indemnified AstraZeneca and other COVID vaccine makers ahead of the mass rollout. And of course, they planned that for the longest time. First thing Fauci did, give them immunity for the childhood vaccines in 1986, and then in 2005, as part of the prep act, George W. Bush, who was there with nine 11 and the Patriot act and the model state health emergency powers act and all the rest of this stuff, uh, he made sure that.

Starting point is 02:47:37 There was even more immunity given to, um, to, uh, people for these, uh, vaccines will be rolled out as part of a massive pandemic or something. And so he made sure that there's going to be nothing, no liability for the companies or for the government that was a co-conspirator in all of this. In the legal case, AstraZeneca is accused of playing hardball,

Starting point is 02:48:16 but it is unclear whether behind the scenes the UK Treasury is balking at any payout. But for the victims, it just prolongs their agony. That's exactly right. And so when we look at the side effects that are there you know as i pointed out and and i corrected i was talking about remdesivir and saying that was a liver thing because i'd seen a lot of people that had liver injury and you can find a lot about remdesivir injuring people's liver but i had a listener who said no no it's the kidneys are the main thing i looked up and it's like yeah they're right're right. That is the main thing. But it also comes after your liver as well.

Starting point is 02:48:46 It's like these vaccines. So is the main thing the blood clots? Is it anaphylactic shock? Is it the myocarditis and the pericarditis? Is it the long amyloid blood clots, long, white, stringy, rubbery things that accumulate? And we go on and on with all these different symptoms. Yeah, it's all of the above.

Starting point is 02:49:09 Which one is the main way to kill people? I'm not sure, actually. Which one is the main death thing? I mean, we've got a lot of people dying suddenly, but that could be from the blood clots or it could be from the myocarditis. It could be from a lot of different things. I think it is the myocarditis. I think people have that and they don't realize until they go out and exercise strenuously just you know how

Starting point is 02:49:31 fragile their heart was that's why it's you know young people are dropping dead suddenly young athletes but we got another symptom now coming from the trump shots. And this is an elevated risk of eye inflammatory disorder. And I thought this was very interesting because, you know, earlier we were talking about cow flu, they want to call it now, right? The bird flu, avian flu. Oh, well, we've had one case in a human being where it jumped from the bird to the cow and then jumped from the cow to the human. And what did the human get?

Starting point is 02:50:08 Got a redness in their eye. And then it was reported by some other people as conjunctivitis, pink eye, right? That's not a big deal, really. Now, there is something that looks like pink eye, which is more serious. Pink eye conjunctivitis is an external infection of your eye, whereas this other condition is uvitis,

Starting point is 02:50:36 is an internal inflammation inside of the eye, and that's more difficult to treat, so it's more serious, but they have many of the eye and that's more difficult to treat. So it's more serious, but they have many of the same symptoms. And so it can be difficult to distinguish if somebody's got a pink eye or if they got uvitis one is external, the other is internal, but they look the same, same symptoms. So I'm thinking,

Starting point is 02:51:00 so this person, we've got one person supposedly. And again, symptoms so i'm thinking so this person we got one person supposedly and again that tells you that as as widespread as they claim the bird flu is if only one person has shown up with it that's probably not what that one person has just thinking critically here and what else might have caused this because now they're saying that this uvitis which can look like pink eye is another uh symptom of covid vaccination they found that 17 percent of nearly a half million people who had been vaccinated 474 000 who have a history of uvitas and recurrence within one year after a vaccination so not only do you get it from it but it can come back later after you've been vaccinated again it is an inflammation inside the eye that occurs in the

Starting point is 02:52:01 immune system is fighting an infection or something like that. So if you get the shot, you might get the eye infection. And then later on, if you're fighting another infection, because it's damaged your immune system, you may wind up getting this. They found it in about 17% of the people and it can look like pink eye. So is this person that they're claiming that caught the bird flu from a cow or drink the bat soup from a pangolin? Is this really another vaccine symptom that this guy had of the 474,000 individuals included in the study cumulative incidence of post-vaccination uitis was 8.6% at three months, 12.5% at six months, 17% at one year. In other words, it's going up.

Starting point is 02:52:53 Post-vaccine, you know, long after you got the vaccine, it's going up. And it was primarily of the anterior type, which is at the front of the eye. So again, it's going to look very much like pink eye. And then we have a Pfizer gate with Ursula fond of lying, uh, proving as this headline says that she can get away with anything, and this is RT talking about, uh, the fact that she had all these dodgy communications with Albert Borla of Pfizer. Uh, they were texting back and forth.

Starting point is 02:53:33 And eventually she wound up signing a contract where she bought 10 doses for every European at the expense of the European Union. And she profited from it. And she was also pushing out the QR code to require people to have proof of vaccination to do anything, you know, the vaccine passport. And so people want to know what's going on with this massive amount of money. It was 4.6 billion vaccines that she bought, 71 billion euros of public money that she gave to her friends and big pharma.

Starting point is 02:54:06 And yet somehow, first of all, she wasn't really interested in showing them the text messages between her and, uh, Borla. And then they just somehow disappeared. And, uh,

Starting point is 02:54:17 we don't really know what happened with it, but isn't this interesting? 10 doses for every European she bought. And we saw the same thing in Australia, 10 doses for every european she bought and we saw the same thing in australia 10 doses for every australian wow i remember talking about that in 2020 uh the fact that hey this thing is they're not looking to end any of this stuff anytime soon and um on rumble atomic dog says my sister-in-law was paralyzed by blood clots i'm very sorry can't walk now oh refuses to believe that it was a jab it's sad the blood clots do not run in the family yeah well you know a lot of times it's difficult for people to um you know

Starting point is 02:55:04 they don't want to believe that there's anything that they did even if they were fooled they would not want to do that other people on the other hand i was like you fool me once okay now i'm on to you and that's going to be the thing that's going to help us the fact that people have looked at this now this is um and i saw this come up yet again uh this was just released um yesterday a renowned scientist said all covid vaxxed people will die in three to five years now i've heard this i've heard other people quote it i've heard alex quote this as well even though this person is a world renowned scientistowned scientist, I don't go on credentials. And I think that they've got very good reason to say that there's going to be a lot of stuff

Starting point is 02:55:52 that's going to continue to increase. The cancer is going to increase. It's going to continue to accelerate. We're going to see other issues like infertility, even pink eye coming back, an eye infection coming back and getting more and more frequent as time goes by over every six month period i think we're going to continue to see this and people are going to just discount it say well i don't know is it the food is it the is it this is it 5g what is it you know we don't know well i think um i think this poison is um is just going to keep doing this it's damaged a lot of people's immune system. It is persistent.

Starting point is 02:56:28 And a lot of people have gotten a lot of jabs at this as well. But I don't know that we should go this absolutist on anything. And so I don't agree with this, that everyone who's been vaccinated with the COVID shots will die within three to five years. That's what the person said going back to 2021, which would mean at the mean point, you know,

Starting point is 02:56:51 that'd be four years. That would be in 2025 kind of center of it. And I, you know, I, I don't believe, and I'm not saying that everybody's going to die, but I think it's going to really accelerate.

Starting point is 02:57:03 And I think it's very interesting. And we've talked about this briefly in the past, the deagle thing, you know, there's really strange. That person had connections with the CIA who put that up. And, you know, it really is like, what is this about? Who is this person? Why are they putting this up? And why are they talking about the number of people that are going to die by different countries? And of course the U S is a few of the places they said population was going to go up but in the united states said it was going to be radically reduced by about two-thirds the uk almost as bad who took the lead in these vaccines trump boris johnson other people like that this person with cia of course you you know, working with these intelligence agencies that are part of the English-speaking five countries, maybe they knew what they were going to be pulling off.

Starting point is 02:57:57 And when you look at this, you know, it was not the, you know, the pandemic, the health threat was always the shot. The shot was the bioweapon. All this stuff about the labs and everything is at this point, a red herring. And so when you look at that, I don't think that you can say that everybody who got vaccinated with even a single shot is going to die. I don't think that's going to be the case. It's never the case. It's one of the reasons why you can get away with stuff like this because you look at this and how people will

Starting point is 02:58:29 react to being exposed to stuff that will kill one person other person may not even get sick that's one of the reasons why it's difficult to prove this stuff and when it gradually rolls out over a period of time and when it continues to get more and more um intense in terms of the people who are harmed by it that is something else that makes it difficult for people to get this but it was a professor cahill uh dr dolores cahill out of germany whose work includes how proteins and antibodies can be used in biomedical applications, including in biomarker discovery, diagnostics, personalized medicine. And I think she's got, she worked with the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Genetics in Berlin, Germany, from 1996 to 2003, has several international patents in this field.

Starting point is 02:59:21 So clearly, technically, she knows what she's talking about. But I think that um you know anybody can make a mistake and i think if you're uh looking at the medicine side of this epidemiological side of this not no matter what you're talking about it's not going to kill everybody but again we need to understand what has been pulled on us. And that's the thing that continues to gnaw at me, that Biden and Trump and all of these Republican and Democrat Congress people who all had a hand in this are not being held to account. And again, we're not doing anything to stop the elevation of this from the state and federal

Starting point is 03:00:04 governments to the international level with the WHO. I think the best thing that we could do is to start contacting. We talked about this as we Jay and Jessica, um, uh, contact me, um, by email and said, Hey, we need to put this stuff out and start pushing on state representatives to, uh, withdraw some of these powers. And I think we probably could even do that perhaps at the local level because there are local public health places, public health bureaucrats

Starting point is 03:00:37 who have been, some of them better, some of them worse than others. But these regulations that were put out incember of 2001 after the anthrax attack and 9 11 all the rest of stuff these are the things that if we destroy that i think we could cut off this pandemic being imposed from above and that includes at the global level especially i think it'd cut it off for the federal government it cut it off for the state government if the state government would cut it off those regulations and cut it off for the federal government, it'd cut it off for the state government. If the state government would cut it off, those regulations, it'd cut it off for the federal government and certainly for the international government. Have a good day. All too common on social media. More alarming. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets.

Starting point is 03:01:26 Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets. Some media outlets.

Starting point is 03:01:30 Some media outlets. Some media outlets. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

Starting point is 03:02:01 Break free from the usual script with The David Knight Show, a fresh perspective bringing you genuine insights on current events. But if the show is going to stay on the air, Thank you. of a community that values the truth. Because independent, listener-funded news, untouched by corporate globalist agendas, is extremely important to our liberties.

The David Knight Show - Thr 2May24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.