The David Knight Show - Thr 5Aug24 David Knight Show UNABRIDGED Christian Voters' Dilemma — CS Lewis, Southern Baptists, Today's Influencers Weigh In

Episode Date: September 5, 2024

(2:00) Another School Shooting & Nashville Tranny Killer Manifesto Released4 dead, 9 hospitalized — details of how this happenedLala immediately hints at what she'd doIs the problem guns, SSRI, other?The history of these shootings and a Columbine survivor's perspective on why, what or who is to blame, and how does forgiveness — different from pardon — help survivorsNashville tranny shooter's journal reveals her twisted religion, sexual obsession and possession"Back-to-School" in the American police state — far less freedom, far more danger(52:38) Our failed, corrupt, incorrigible "medical system"Doctor removes wrong organ and kills the patient — an example of incompetence and failure to purge incompetent doctorsmRNA TrumpShots and Fibrous Growth of "Clots" PostmortemAustralia's "Excess Death Inquiry" is a transparent cover-up trying to explain away a massive number of vaccine deaths with implausible excusesFDA now stands for Fraudulent Drug Advocates — as a 3rd untested "Covid vaccine" is given EUA (Emergency Use Authorization).  What emergency?Dutch paper gets 700 "hell no" responses when they ask their readers if they'd get another Covid vaccineTim Walz bribed parents with cash to vaccinate children as young as 5. Reprehensible.  But so is the partisan blame. Breitbart ignores Republicans doing the sameSingapore begins 21 day quarantine for mPox contacts(1:38:11) GrifterGate - Buying MAGA Influencers There's no alleged criminal activity of conservative influencers like Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Benny Johnson and others.  But the amazing money being thrown around is a huge temptation to spin the truth into a lie — and that's being done on a regular basis (2:09:03) MoneyWhere does gold go from here?  Many are looking at $2,700 but Peter Schiff says up to $60,000.  Why?Is gold speculative or defensive?Darwin Award: TikTokers film themselves committing check fraud, exploiting the "infinite Money Glitch"Turkey moves towards BRICS(2:23:52) Evolving Ethics of Voting: From CS Lewis, SBC of 90's, to Today's Influencers If you don't see a moral dilemma in the 2024 election choices, you need to hear this.  A look at what CS Lewis, Southern Baptists of the 1990's, Alan Parr, Michael Brown, and others have to say about the moral dilemma facing the voter.With Bad to Worse Options, How Should Christians Think About Voting?Allen Parr, YouTube Christian, explains that character doesn't matterQuestions you can ask yourself to see if politics is your religionFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @[e-mail] App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silverFor 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to TrendsJournal.com and enter the code KNIGHTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

When you're not weighed down by high interest rates, life lightens up. MBNA TrueLine MasterCards have low interest rates on balance transfers and purchases to give your finances a lift. Find the credit card that's right for you. Visit mbna.ca slash truelinecards. Give your finances a lift. Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to The David Knight Show. As the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday, the 5th of September, Year of Our Lord 2024. Well, today we're going to begin with the shooting, because we know this is going to be used politically.

It's a horrific thing. But even more importantly, what's the problem with our society? And we're going to go back and listen to a survivor from Columbine. Because that was really a turning point. And we really had not had, even though there had been an occasional school shooting, there really wasn't this type of school shooting. Until a couple of smaller ones, two years preceding that. So we're going to talk about that. We're also going to talk about what is happening with the vaccines and politics. And we have an inquiry in Australia about excess deaths. And it is the most rigged, absurd thing you've ever seen.

While we have embalmers showing these fibrous clots that are building in people's bodies after they take them out these clots continue to grow post-mortem how is that happening we'll be right back Well, we had a shooting yesterday. Yet another one in Georgia. Four dead, nine hospitalized, two teachers, two students killed. A 14-year-old is in custody and will be charged with murder and handled as an adult, say the authorities. He surrendered when he was confronted by the responding law enforcement officers, so we don't have a situation where there was a dead shooter. There'll be an opportunity for them to talk to him, of course,

and find out what is going on. As a matter of fact, they talked to him a year ago. Supposedly, he was reported by the FBI to the local sheriff's department because he was making threats online about shooting up the school. And so they went in and talked to him. He denied that those were his posts. And his father said, yes, we have hunting rifles, but they are under control. And so the sheriff said, okay, never mind.

And the school did nothing about it. He used what they say is an AR platform style gun. Now, when we look at the Supreme Court decisions that said that the, you have to look at the original intention and, of course, intention that they came up with, the standard that they came up with, which I don't agree with i i don't think um that really is what the founders had in mind for the second amendment second amendment was about creating a a counter threat to the government to make sure just like you have mutually assured destruction for nuclear weapons you don't want to use the nuclear weapons, but you create them as a threat to the other side using them.

It's like, well, if you do this, it's going to kill us both. And that's not guaranteed that you're not going to have a madman on the other side still pull the trigger, but that was the basis of the nuclear deterrent. And what the Second Amendment is, is a deterrent, a deterrent to a government that would try to, uh, try to take over everything as we see it happening slowly with our government. And, um, and yet what the Supreme court said was that you are allowed to have anything that is in common use. Well, that's fine. Under that, it's not fine, but under that standard, you've just recently had a judge say, well, okay, machine guns qualify for that. Because they've been around and they were commonly used and so forth. In the past, they've had standards.

When you had the sawed-off shotgun in the Miller case in the 1930s, as they were making their first probes into gun control, they said, well, the sawed-off shotgun is not a military weapon, and only military weapons are covered by the second amendment well that's not true either and neither was it true that it was you know it's not just military weapons of course that is a primary purpose the supreme court understood that now if you say we should be able to have something if it's a military weapon they freak out you've had mcchrystal and other military retired people say,

well, do you realize how fast a bullet goes? If it's coming out of a military weapon, you know, that kind of nonsense. You know, oh, you shouldn't have, civilians shouldn't have military weapons. We need to have a standing army and they need to have a monopoly on force, that type of thing. Well, that is antithetical to the intention of the founders it's antithetical to good sense but that is not the standard either so it's not whether it's in common use standard is not whether it's a military weapon or not none of that stuff matters

we're given god-given rights to protect ourselves and that includes even knives and so now people are starting to some people in some court cases have started to challenge some state prohibitions on knives depending on how they're you know switch blades or if the blade is a certain length or this or that people have said well that still is a weapon of self-defense and so that should be covered in the second amendment as well um but again that is not the standard it is not self-defense the standard is to be able to protect yourself against government primarily i think but it's a god-given right to be able to defend ourselves as well that's just common sense applied to it so if you look at it as the ar platform the reason i get into all of this is

because they want to focus on it they want to say no that's a military weapon it needs to be taken away but the ar platform as i said it's got that because that is perhaps one of if not the most common guns out there and so of course they're going to be used over and over again it doesn't mean that they are as the left likes to portray, some kind of a super weapon that makes the holder invincible. That's the way they like to portray it. I mean, we look at these shooting at the Texas church. I can't remember what it was. Spring was in the name uh but anyway um uh that guy who was uh shooting up the church from the

outside with an ar he was taken down and killed by another guy with an ar or you have the situation in a mall where a guy would came in he had the ar sutherland springs sutherland Springs. Thank you very much. Yes. Mark Collins, realistic sculpture of George Washington. And on one side of the picture is that sculpture of George Washington, and on the other side is Mark Collins, and they are spitting images of each other. It's amazing. But he goes around, he dresses up as George Washington, and he tells kids in classrooms about Washington, about the founding of this country, and he's got it right. He's also played George Washington in a number of movies and things like that.

I mean, it's pretty amazing how he looks. Anyway, he used to be the pastor at Sutherland Springs, and he contacted me. The day after, that happened on a Sunday, and I had him that Monday morning, and he said, I know, you know, I used to be the pastor after that happened on a Sunday and I had him that Monday morning and he said, I know, um, you know, I used to be the pastor of that church. I know the guy who is the pastor whose daughter was killed. And he said, it's being reported by the media that this guy was stopped with a defender

who heard the shooting and came running, uh, stopped to the guy who had a shotgun. He said, no, that's not right. He had an AR and he was actually an nra instructor as well uh so they will always try to make the ar into some kind of a super weapon that's got to be banned but you also had the situation in a mall where a guy comes in he's got a an ar pistols and magazines i'd forget all the stuff they came in we had several different things he just started shooting at random at people and there was a guy who was carrying concealed in defiance of the store prohibitions and he pulled out his gun and he ran over and leaned against a post there in the shopping center and he took him out with a pistol i mean you know this this is the

reality but that's not what is going to be sold to you by la la and the democrats and the gun controllers and so they're going to focus on the ar platform we've got to do something about that but here's the other thing no teachers were armed where was school security and as i said before he was a known threat and And they just went with it. They said, well, you know, keep an eye on him. I guess the school security was not doing it. There was actually three officers whose job it was to protect the school. No word about what they did.

We really don't know. The nine people in the hospital are expected to survive, but four people died. So this is going to be used for political capital. Lala here said, as she was giving a speech yesterday, I'm going to go off script here. She's also going to go off the constitutional oath that she took as well. It's senseless. We've got to stop it. We have to end this epidemic of gun violence in our country once and for all.

Okay, well, you know, tell us what the problem is. Do you know what the problem is? Now, she just wants to use that to come after the Second Amendment and our God-given rights. I say that we keep the Second Amendment, and maybe what we do is to get rid of the government schools or at the very least we tell teachers you need to be able to defend yourself lala is not going to come defend you neither is biden or trump none of them are going to defend you that's something we're going to talk about later today i'm seeing

this over and over again the country is lost if we don't have Trump. Or on the left, la-la, right? And this is escalating every election now. Now, I'm going to leave the country if this doesn't go the way that I want. Or I'm going to have a revolution or whatever. Look, we need to take personal responsibility for our lives. And we need to take responsibility for children keep them at home and teach them because there's far more dangerous things than being shot

at or even killed that are going on in the schools all the time you've got dangerous people up in front of the classroom in many many cases teaching your kids and destroying do a war at war against their soul. Their very soul, their eternal soul. That's what they're doing in the schools. Don't fear the people who can destroy the body. Fear those who destroy the, who can destroy the soul.

And that's the school institution. Yeah. We need to tell the teachers if they're going to do this, that they need to take some personal responsibility for their lives. That's not something we talk about in America anymore. Personal responsibility, is it? We're not talking about being a hero. Right?

Heroes run into burning buildings. But people who are defending themselves and taking responsibility to defend their own lives, that's a very different situation and a very different dynamic. And people will do that. If you have the means of defense, you will. But sometimes in many of these cases, we have a brave teacher who charges the shooter and gets killed. That might buy some time for somebody else to escape. But why just use your body as a shield why not train yourself be able to fight back why not even the odds and that's what guns do guns even the odds based on um how much you train with it uh of course

anybody can be shot from behind and that type of thing. But still, if you have a situation that evens the odds, especially for women, for elderly people, it gives them a chance, which they otherwise would not have. You know, it doesn't have to be this way. She said, it doesn't have to be this way. I traveled our country meeting with our young leaders, said Lala. So it was college-aged young leaders, trade schools, colleges, universities, she said.

And I'll tell you one of the things I asked them every time I went into the auditorium, it would be filled with these young leaders, students. And I would ask them, raise your hand if at any point between kindergarten and 12th grade you had to endure an active shooter drill. And she said nearly every hand went up. Well, see, it's because she's asking young people and because this is something that happened uh in the late 90s why did this start in the late 90s because if you ask somebody who's older they don't even have to be as old as i am i'm getting pretty old uh but they don't even have to be as old as me to remember when they would go to school and there was no concern about a shooting event. There was no fear at all of that.

It was unknown. And yet what was known was people and RFK juniors talked about this as well. Even up in the Northeast. I grew up in the South. I grew up in the South. He grew up in the Northeast. And I thought it was just a Southern thing that people would drive around with rifle racks and actual rifles in their rifle racks and pickup trucks. But he said that happened up there where he was as well. People would bring their guns to school to train for ROTC or the rifle club or whatever.

There were no mass shootings. So what's changed? Guns were actually far more common than they are today. And there were no shootings. So it's not the guns. And if you're going to do something about it, that isn't going to solve the problem. So when did all this stuff start?

Well, Columbine was 1999. And prior to that, we'd really you know occasionally there'd be some kind of a fight or something somebody you know would happen to be at school um you know they might have had a shot or something like that but it was extreme it was really yeah i hate to use the term rare it's been so overused by fauci in the false way it was rare you know well this really was rare uh in 1997 there were two shootings like this in 1998 there were two shootings and then in 1999 you had columbine that captured the imagination of the country it was highly publicized why did that happen you know was it the ssris was it uh society in general video games what was it you know what what caused this type of thing well certainly ssris had just recently come on the scene as had the um ask your doctor commercials pushing all of this stuff. And they started questioning the effects of SSRIs on young people

in the very early 2000s, right after this Columbine thing. There absolutely is a connection with that. And when we talk about SSRI stories, I can never remember if it's.net,.com,.org, but SSRI stories has, uh, over 7,000 stories like this. And stories like a young person who had adjusted their dosage and it made him go crazy because they're having other issues with the SSRIs is having other

physical issues with them pain. They're burning or something. So I was like, I'm not going to take that stuff. And you just stop at cold Turkey after you've been taking it. And then all of a sudden you don't know what you're doing. You have this psychotic event, like a young guy who goes to his school with a rifle and he goes into the classroom and everybody backs off and he stands in front of the classroom and he points the rifle at the class. Then he points it at himself.

Then he points it at the class and he points at him and they're able to get that away from him before he shot himself for the classroom. He points the rifle at the class. Then he points it at himself. Then he points it at the class. Then he points it at him. And they were able to get that away from him before he shot himself in the class. And after he recovered in the hospital from SSRIs, he didn't remember any of that. And so,

it absolutely is a factor. And they will absolutely never talk about that. But there's other issues as well and so You know when you look at what SSRIs are now You know, they're just coming on the scene at that point in time Now it is the 22nd most common prescription drug

SSRIs given for all kinds of things you're having trouble sleeping yeah have some murder suicide pills uh but uh then we see things like this food dyes linked to neurobehavioral problems may be banned from california schools they would like for you to follow that red herring but don't follow that uh yeah they are absolutely unhealthy no doubt about it but we're not talking about something that's at the level of the ssri is at all um you know definitely um you know get unhealthy stuff out and then we just had the tennessee star they'll show you one poison but not the other poison that's right that's right yeah look at this over here i'll pay attention to this and so california is focusing on that um and the tennessee star has been focused on getting this killer this training killer uh audrey hale who shot up the school um killed a couple of nine-year-olds and uh some teachers there and left a manifesto

and the question has always been so so why is the FBI so intent and the liberal government there in Nashville, why are they so intent in keeping this secret? And it is all of this stuff about people being bullied and all the rest of it. This all goes back to Columbine as well. This is the excuse that they came up with. In that particular situation, you had a couple of guys

who were dressing up as goths, but now people are dressing up as the opposite sex and saying, here, you bully me. This is what's going to happen. But let's take a look at the true horror of Columbine. This is a young man who was one of the students there. His sister was killed. He survived. And he has been going around. He's a Christian. He's been going around talking to people about this event for a very long time and also talking to them about forgiveness.

How do you get over something like that? And so he's being interviewed by Billy Hall. Well, sure. Yeah. I mean, you, you mentioned your friend who died next to you, you were in the library, you saw and experienced some of the most horrific things imaginable, particularly for a teenager, a kid at the time, you know, it was horrific for the entire country. You went through it coming out of that when it when it comes to forgiveness, we talk a lot about forgiveness in our culture, maybe not enough, but the word gets thrown around a lot. But you really have had to deal with that. How did you get to a place of forgiveness?

What was that journey like for you? Coming out of a situation where 12 kids, a teacher killed by their peers. It's just horrific. Yeah. A lot of times, um, I, you know, just a recap a little bit about what I went through. I was in the library, which was the scene of the most intense shooting. Um, I watched as the shooters went around the room, taunting students and treated it like it was a game. They came over to where I was. I saw my friend Isaiah. They called them racial slurs. They tried to pull them out from underneath the table. They killed him. Then they killed my friend Matt and they left me underneath that table. I thought I was going to die. And I felt that I heard God speak to me. And I am careful even with that phrase.

God told me to do something because I know that my own thinking can get in the way of that still small voice that's within. But I felt very strongly and impressed that a voice that was all knowing, wise, and told me to get out of there. I was the first student to stand up, looked around the room. I saw the shooters were gone and I yelled at everyone, let's get out of here. A group of us ran out. There was a police car outside. We all got behind the police car. And shortly after the shooters came back into the library and began to exchange gunfire with the police. Behind the police car, I was holding a girl who had been shot. Her name was Val Schnur. And she had a conversation with the shooters just minutes earlier where one of them walked by her and she said, oh God. And it caught his attention. He said, God, you believe in God? And had this conversation between the two of them where she was begging for her life.

And finally she said she did. She said yes. And then I heard a shotgun, but she survived. And I'm holding her behind this police car trying not to let her go to sleep. It's amazing what kicks in. You know, you think we're more resilient than we realize sometimes. Things automatically kick in that you don't even know. I mean, I'm 16 years old, just turned 16, and I'm holding, and all I knew all of a sudden, it just came to me.

You don't let someone who's losing blood go to sleep. Also, I'm in total shock, which is your brain's way of kind of protecting you from this the gravity of what you're dealing with so you're in total shock it feels surreal when i was in the library i was completely paralyzed with fear and it was it was less than 10 minutes but it felt like it uh it felt, you know, hours that I was in there because those seconds just, um, are so long and you're, you're totally, um, aware of every, you're, you're just in this very crazy, crazy place. What, what I, what I've learned about forget, uh, you know, these ask about forgiveness is, you know, a lot of times we don't realize we need forgiveness. Like we're angry about something. We don't know sometimes what it is. We're carrying around some, some stuff from our past, some, our anger for, and I didn't realize it, but for years I was,

um, I was for years, I was angry and I hated the shooters. I mean I would – the reason I hated them is because the news got the overall reason wrong why the shooting happened. Not because they were intentionally trying to, but everybody wanted to know why. And this story came out that's just not true. And the story is these guys were pushed to the edge with being bullied at school so bad that they got revenge. And that was the overall story that came out from Columbine. Even the psychologists and everybody in the community, everyone that's learned about Columbine realizes that's not what happened. That had to be frustrating, you know, to continue to hear that even now that still comes up, right? You know, as the primary reason a lot of people go back factor. And in fact, that caused in the mind of the

American psyche, a bad formula that's existed for 25 years. And we need as a country need to get rid of that formula. And the formula is, oh, you've been bullied at school, look out a school, you could do a school shooting. Well, so wrong because that's that's the equivalent of you stepped on my toe i'm going to cut off your limbs yeah and that is something that we've seen from this trainee shooter in nashville this is again comes up well you know she was bullied i'm sure because all trainees are bullied that type of thing and by the way i correct i need to correct what I said before. It was three nine-year-olds that were killed by her at point blank.

And three adult staff members before. She was shot by the police department, who got there very quickly. Good for them. But that was a narrative that surfaced. And I think that the reason I bring all this stuff up. And because I go back to this is because we really do need to look at the reasons why this is happening. It's not because of AR-15s or whatever it is that they want to focus on. And certainly, you know, as he said, bullying can be a factor.

I think a big factor is the SSRIs, but none of this explains it 100%. Some of these things are used to excuse it. Some of these things are co-opted for their own agendas. But I think that this played a big part. And why the FBI and the liberal government there in Nashville, there were people in the police department who were leaking this to the Tennessee Star, a conservative paper that was putting some of that stuff out. And so there was a fight between the local liberal government there of Nashville,

a liberal judge, and the FBI wanting to keep this quiet because I think they wanted to put this out and have people feed this killer into this narrative that she was a victim. You know, like the two guys at Columbine were victims of being bullied. Between June the 5th and September the 3rd, the Tennessee Star published approximately 50 articles based on the Covenant Killers 2023 journal, but do not contain the actual pages from that journal. Tuesday's publication of the Covenant Killers 2023 journal provides do not contain the actual pages from that journal tuesday's publication of the

covenant killers 2023 journal provides further evidence supporting those 50 articles it also reveals some new information including the octagonal symbol that hale drew when writing about her planned attack covenant school or her gender identity let's scroll down you can see that uh she draws that everywhere in it but i don't know the significance of that she was 28 years old a biological female who claimed she was male and she had some very strange and interesting uh perspective on this very weird but does give us an insight she said she expressed sexual fantasies with stuffed animals she said i'm such a pervert i waste too much time in my fantasies though the journal offers scant evidence of a political ideology or motive

she wrote a political rant in an entry dated one month prior. She complained about the U.S. failing to respect the rights of disabled people, gun owners, and transgender people. She said, so now because of you, I wish death on myself because of the pure hatred of my female gender. With no rights, anyone's country is a dictatorship, she wrote in her diary. She also said, my parents, my effing parents, think of themselves first in their preference of conservative religion, make them believe that the child they are given should stay that way. Make them go to youth group and force Christian friends in their life because the old ones were a bad influence. Parents actually believe religion can change nature.

That could explain why I don't practice religion anymore. Let kids think for themselves, she wrote. And yet, as the Tennessee Star points out, her suicidal tendencies rested on the belief that she would go to heaven and get a male body. And maybe 72 virgins. I don't know. She's coming up with this theology.

You know, quite frankly, she just invented her own religion. I don't want a free golden start to an opportune new life. That's the way she wrote it. I just want another life beyond this realm. She hoped that after she died, her male spirit would escape her female body as a butterfly leaves its cocoon, which she referred to as a cacoon, the way she wrote it. Again, the grammar, the spelling is,

somehow she missed a lot of things at school, at Sunday school, a lot of other things. The cocoon of my own self will die when I leave my body behind and the boy in me will be free in my butterfly transformation. You see, the problem with her is she has an obsession with sexual fantasies in her diary she says it's all she thinks about she's completely enslaved to it she is a lover of self and she hates everybody else but it is this obsession that enslaved her um so she goes on to say, if God won't give me a boy body in heaven, then Jesus is a faggot, she said. And she goes on to say, my faith is weak.

What does she have faith in? Why does she have faith in? While expressing hope that she'll be in a better place after her rampage, she said, God, forgive me. Based on what? Now this commentary, this commentary this commentary from the daily signal says her faith appears to be based on a form of gnosticism an ancient christian heresy no it's not it's not uh it was it was not something dreamed up by christians

it was something that was embraced by some christians but it was a pagan greek idea from greek philosopher that everything in the world is contaminated. And so you need to be pure. You need to reject everything that is physical in the world. And that's not Christianity. Some Christians were fooled into that early on, but it was based on a Greek philosophy, Greek philosopher who came up with that. But nevertheless, it is built on the idea that the physical world is bad and the spiritual world is good and you need to eradicate everything that's physical. No, no. God is going to redeem the physical. A good example of it is you go back

and look at Randy Alcorn's book about heaven, and he talks about that. He says, yeah, God is going to fix what we broke. And part of it is restoring our relationship with Christ. But he's also going to fix the world. Physical world is not bad. It's the cursed physical world as a result of our rebellion. But no, she was a lover of herself. She was a slave to her lust she was obsessed she was possessed and so then what is the reason for this kind of

stuff is because these poor people are victims victims of their environment victims of society victims of the heterosexual norm is that why this kind of stuff is happening well he had oh this is much shorter he talked about um the reason why and again here is um that young man who survived columbine about 25 years ago and so you asked well why did columbine happened i don't have all the reasons i can't tell you everything but i have learned a lot. And I can tell you that, that, that I, what I've after everything I've learned, as far as people are concerned, the biggest people responsible are the two shooters. It's not,

it's not the school. It's not people that may be treated them bad. It's not their parents. It's not the medication they were on. It's not the guns that they got. It's the choices that they made in their, in their heart to just to get into a dark place, to choose to kill and, and, and choices that they made to lie,

to not, not do the things that they are going to say they're going to do to all kinds of things. So, you know, even as a teenager, when I watched them on the news, I remember, and they were older than me, they were a couple of years older than me. And I thought they knew what they were doing. They were planning on it. They planned it. They plan, Eric specifically planned it for over a year. So very sick and twisted dwelling on the darkest thoughts that you could have having these dark fantasies of of being in power and and and showing the world your anger and your rage and all and just this uh very egotistical very arrogant um uh fantasy and that eric had and then there were two different kids and i've learned a lot about, and I say kids, one was 17, one was 18.

But they, just like other shooters of shootings, they knew what they were doing was so wrong. Yeah. Yeah. Just like the Nashville shooter. They'd planned it for a very long time. Had dark fantasies. You know, the difference is,

as I said many times before, you know, we have lust, lust greed the pride of life you know the pride of life that's the power that's what they were into yeah everybody's gonna fear us and the rest politicians get into that the money so many people uh are drawn into it based on money or in the case of this shooter in nashville it was sex sex money power and these are the dark fantasies that drive us to this kind of stuff uh more often for most people that actually is money the love of money the root of all evil said jesus well uh so how do you get forgiveness right he narrows it down he says no it's not any it's not their parents it's not society it's not drugs it's not any of this stuff they are the ones to blame for

this you know we can look at other things as contributing factors and uh things that have harmed other people but in this particular case you know they were not under some ssri fog he said it was them and so what do you do with that here's a short clip where he talks about forgiveness so but back to the issue of forgiveness um forgiveness is like setting a prisoner free and finding out that prisoner is you so you have all this anger and you and you realize forgiveness is what sets you free from that uh forgiveness is a spiritual issue and people a lot of times misunderstand it. They think that forgiveness is saying, oh, it's okay what you did. Now, sometimes that it is when you're meant to be in relation and connection with somebody,

you forgive them and you forget what they did and you say it's okay. And you give them grace. You give them mercy. But sometimes something happens from someone and it's not okay it's completely wrong and evil or whatever you want to call it and at that point it's not about saying it's okay so you and there's it's saying i'm going to choose to let go and it's for your sake forgiveness most of time is for you it It's for you. That's the essence of it is forgiveness is a freeing thing. And people don't realize, well, they, because what happens is you go,

well, I have a right to be angry. Yes, you do. It's for some things that have happened. You can either hold on to that right and it let it eat you inside. And it then comes out in different ways, usually on people that you don't intend it to go out onto or onto yourself or you are living in torment in your mental health or you have an attitude of forgiveness and choose to let go so i forgave the shooters at columbine but i would not pardon them pardon is a, is an issue of the law. If they had not killed themselves that day, I would have, I would, I believe that they belonged in prison so that they couldn't do that again until. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. And so,

you know, when we look at this, this is something that really affects all of us. Pretty much all of us were affected negatively in 2020, one way or the other, by Trump, by Biden, by public health officials, by Fauci, by many others. What is the appropriate response? Is it just say, okay, never mind. I don't care. I'm going to vote for this guy again. As a matter of fact, he's going to save the world if he gets to be president a second time or whatever. Do we just give him a pass and say it doesn't matter? No, it does matter.

We don't pardon them and we don't put them in a position of power after they have done this type of thing. But we don't hold any personal animosity against them. They're not living in our head, which is what I'm always accused of when I criticized, oh, Trump's still living in your head, is he? I said, no, he's going to run again. I said that in 2021. I said, I'm talking about Trump because he's not done. Don't you realize he's not done?

He's going to come back and he's going to, you know, he's a very dangerous person because he's not coming at you straight on. You know, there's two kinds of dangers. You know, one of them is somebody comes straight on at you. They're flying their flag. You know that they've got intent to harm. And you're warned about that. And then there's another one where the person sneaks up on you from behind and sucker punches

you or shoots you in the back or stabs you in the back or stabs you in the arm or whatever. That is much more dangerous. And I've used the analogy many times. The difference between a soldier flying their flag and a spy. The spies are treated more harshly for that reason. But so why do authorities, getting back to Audrey, why do authorities seem so intent on hiding the journals nearly 18 months after the shooting?

Do they fear that Hale's religious approach to gender identity might undermine the appeal of gender ideology in American society? Well, of course, and they want to keep this narrative going, which goes all the way back to Columbine. These poor people are victims. They are bullied and so forth. Audrey is not a victim. She's not a victim.

She made those decisions. She decided to turn herself over fully to her lust for sex, just as these shooters at Columbine turn themselves over fully for the lust of power. And so we have to see this clearly. And we're not going to be able to do that unless we look at it spiritually. And so Free Thought Project has an article that was written by John Whitehead at the Rutherford Institute. What does it mean to go back to school in the American police state? Again, I grew up at a time when schools were very, very different than they are now.

I hated them for different reasons. I hated them because it was a confining, mind-numbing, time-wasting experience. But now there's shootings in spite of the metal detectors and the prison environment that's there. There's sexual perversion. There's gender gas lighting. There's all this kind of stuff that's happening. And John Whitehead says every day well actually quotes investigative journalist annette fuentes it says every day in communities across the u.s

children and adolescents spend the majority of their waking hours in schools that have increasingly come to resemble places of detention more than places of learning and it is by design i said this when they first started it back in the 90s. I said they're conditioning kids to live in a police state with lockdowns. We never had lockdowns. We never had metal detectors. We never had police in the schools and we never had shootings either. But they're conditioning people for fear, uncertainty, doubt. They're conditioning people to passively trust the government for protection. And the government doesn't do that.

Training them to be locked down. As a matter of fact, I was just talking to Pastor Jeff Weiss, who I talked to on a podcast. I've been a guest on a podcast that he does with Trent Luce. And he said, you know, our parents' generation abdicated so much stuff. So much stuff that they were responsible for, they abdicated to other people. I thought that was a great description of what happened in our parents' generation. And a lot of that was based on a misplaced trust and government i believe because of world war ii everybody rallied around the government and government became this larger than life thing

and they trusted it they abdicated they you know turned over a lot of their parental parental responsibilities to the government and things like that john whitehead goes on to say out on the streets you got the menace posed by police officers who shoot first and ask questions later. In your neighborhoods, you've got to worry about the nanny state and its network of busybodies turning parents in for allowing their kids to walk to school alone or walk to the park alone or play at the beach alone or even play on their own yard alone. And every one of those, he's got a link to a case where they came after the parents for doing that kids are walking to school walking to the park playing at the beach playing in their own yard

they come after the parents the tentacles of the police state even intrude into the sanctity of one's home with the government believing it knows better than you the parent what is best for your child in recent years from parents being arrested for attempting to walk their kids home from school the parents being fined and threatened with jail time for their kids bad behavior links for all of that or for tardiness at school you know when you look at the oppressive nature of this the comprehensive nature of the oppression. Do you see God's hand in allowing homeschool? Well, I saw it in the early 90s. I looked at it, and as a libertarian, I had been seeing how encroaching government in

every aspect of our life was just growing like a cancer. And then I saw homeschooling, and I thought, wow, how is that? How is it in this one area the government's grip is loosening up? Why are we having freedom in this one area? Even when in North Carolina, the ruling Democrats and the teachers union wanted to strangle it in its infancy and they failed. How's that happening? teachers union wanted to strangle it in its infancy and they failed. How's that happening? Well, I think it is a clearer sign of God's involvement than Trump's earshot, which I'm still not too sure about, quite frankly,

but I am sure about what's going on with homeschooling. God has given you an opportunity. If you're a parent, he's given you an opportunity if you're a parent he's given you an opening he's given you the freedom to train your kids and the way they should go will you take it will you take that gift from him he says public schools or parents have little or no control of whether kids are taught how they're taught how they are disciplined to the extent to which they're being indoctrinated. And they're all marching in lockstep with the government's authoritarian playbook. The message is chillingly clear. Your children are not your own, but are in fact wards of the state who have just been temporarily entrusted to your care. It was 11 years ago that there was a public service announcement on MSNBC

by Melissa Harris Perry saying precisely that, 11 years ago, saying that. And they're now been implementing it quite a bit. We have never invested as much in public education as we should have because we've always had kind of a private notion of children. Your kid is yours and totally your responsibility. We haven't had a very collective notion of these are our children. So part of it is we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families

and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the households, then we start making better investments. Yeah, when it's everybody's responsibility, it's nobody's responsibility. When everything belongs to everybody, guess what? It doesn't belong to anybody.

Just take a look at what happens to the common areas. Take a look at what happens to communism. Now, that was 11 years ago. 15 years ago, I answered this before she ever did a public service announcement. Certain truths are self-evident. We're endowed by our creator with rights. Certain relationships are also inalienable. Family was the first institution created by our creator, and the family is the fundamental building block of every healthy society, and every just government.

But government and family are two different authorities or spheres with different roles and different responsibilities. Each authority is uniquely suited for a particular task and doesn't do the task of the other well. Families have traditionally been assumed to be acting out of love in the best interest of its members, and have been left alone unless proven to be abusive. But a new attitude has been cultivated by those that believe children should be raised by the village and not by their family. This

approach to children and their families has been spelled out in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The UN Convention assumes government responsibility for all the needs of children and transfers responsibilities and rights from parents to government. Government is seen as capable of providing every want to the child and as responsible for instilling correct values, their values, into children. Parents are mentioned in the UN Convention only as problems for children to be protected from or as mere advisors to their children, so long as their advice is not too strong or coercive. Children are encouraged to form their values independent of their parents.

But nowhere is there a sense that they would ever need protection from a government. This troubling document has been ratified as a treaty throughout the world, with the U.S. as virtually the only lone holdout. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is about 16 pages. On the other hand, the Parental Rights Amendment is only three short paragraphs. It's a simple restatement of what has until recently been what every culture, every government except authoritarian governments, saw as the rights of parents. The Parental Rights Amendment would strengthen the Constitution to protect the family by

explicitly stating self-evident truths about an inalienable relationship. Find out what you can do at parentalrights.org. Yeah, I did that 15 years ago. Instead of being taught the three R's of education, reading, writing, arithmetic, young people are being drilled in the three L's of life, or three I's rather, indoctrination, intimidation, and intolerance.

And so John Whitehead says, the moment a child enters one of the nation's 98,000 public schools, the amount of money that we're spending on this is astronomical. Until the moment that he or she graduates, they'll be exposed to a steady diet of draconian zero tolerance policies that criminalize childish behavior. Overreaching anti-bullying statutes that criminalize speech. Again, thanks to the narrative created about Columbine. School resource officers.

The police. Tasked with disciplining and or arresting disorderly students. Standardized testing that emphasizes rote answers over critical thinking. Politically correct mindsets that teach young people to censor themselves and those around them. By the way, I don't call that politically correct anymore. It is Marxist struggle sessions is what that is about. And extensive biometric and surveillance systems coupled with rest acclimate young people to

a world in which they have no freedom of thought, no freedom of speech, and no freedom of movement. This is how you groom young people to march in lockstep with a police state. So you want to stop the police state? End the government indoctrination. You want to own your home? Ever? Well, then you end the wasteful spending of these 98,000 indoctrination camps that are a threat to the freedom and dignity. I'll never forget.

My introduction to B.F. Skinner was when Karen was getting her master's degree in education. And I saw that. Beyond freedom and dignity, I said, well, it's about time somebody complained about the schools. He said, this is humiliating, confining nonsense. And she said, no, no, no, that's not the thesis of this at all. It's exactly the opposite.

He is saying that we need to take away freedom and dignity, that freedom and dignity that freedom and dignity is not inherent to human beings because he's a hardcore atheist rejected the idea that we're created in the image of god and when you do that it leads you to doing the kinds of things that are being done today we We'll take a quick break. We'll be right back. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us

has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around

and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. thedavidknight show.com. And again, you can find the links on where you can find the program as well as how you can support us if you go to the DavidKnightShow.com. I really do appreciate your support. It is very necessary.

We are supported by voluntary contributions from you. As a matter of fact, we're going to talk today. I have more important things to say. First, I want to talk about the school thing. I want to talk about coming up now. I want to talk about the school thing. And I want to talk about coming up now. I'm gonna talk about some pharmaceutical news, but I'm going to get into what I call grifter gate. Um, just my term, but we have this, uh, all these conservative influencers like Tim pool and Dave Rubin and anything, the contracts that they

negotiated with this organization. And they didn't know that they were doing it with an organization that was using Russian money. And, uh, and we uh and we'll talk about what was happening with it but the amounts of money that's the real scandal i think uh the because again there wasn't really you know they were they were not listed as co-conspirators or russian, that's kind of a smear that's been put out there by some in the mainstream media. Of course, the conservative alternative media, mainstream alternative media, as David Icke calls it,

the MAMS, instead of the mainstream media, but the mainstream alternative media is completely ignoring this. Just like the mainstream media is completely ignoring this. Just like the mainstream media is completely ignoring the Chinese agent that was trying to influence and did influence the New York government governors. But as I point out, what was there was really not of any substance. And this really had not happened. Nothing of any substance had happened with this either, but the amount of money was scandalous.

And of course, if you get somebody accustomed, see, you don't ever, at the beginning of something like that, you don't have a quid pro quo. Just like the government doesn't come out and say, well, I'm going to give you this massive amount of millions or tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars for your school systems, and then they don't come in with a strings. Instead, what they do is they give you that money for a few years.

And that after that has become a part of something that you depend on, right? Yeah. Because the money coming in is always just, it's like your garage, you know, no matter how big your garage is, the junk will always expand to fill the available space. Right. And so no matter how big your budget is, the junk will always come in to fill it up. Right.

That's just the way it is. And so once the, once the junk has come in and, and you are completely using all that income, it's not something that's new and it's not considered to be excess anymore. That's your now your new normal now if it's a big chunk of income at that point at some point in the future they could have come in and uh use that to get these guys to do what they want now none of that had happened yet uh would it have happened no we just have to uh you know speculate about that one way the other we don't know but uh to me that was a scandal was the amount of money we're not getting uh when we do the podcast a hundred thousand dollars an episode like tenpool or four hundred thousand dollars an

episode like benny johnson was offered by just this one company of course they had other income streams as well out there just mind-boggling to see that uh but um we don't need that uh we need a lot less and uh you know it's of course i think travis could do better if he did a podcast on his own talking about video games than uh what i can do helping him here i'm too unhinged i'd go off the rails you get canceled even even at a video game thing on youtube yeah that's the other thing these guys are you know they have no problem with youtube does that seem suspicious what are they talking about then yeah youtube wants to censor everything of any value that's talked about um even if you say 2020 was the year the world became China, that's it.

You're gone. So anyway, we'll talk about that coming up, but we do appreciate your support. We don't need $100,000 per episode to survive. You know, the wisdom is, as it says in the Bible, don't make me poor, don't make me rich. God, keep me somewhere in the middle. Don't lose my mind. Either one of those extremes can be a severe test for us. I don't think I could handle being rich.

I'd do something insane. I'd diamond and crust a peacock or something like that. See, that's the thing. When you look at people who have a lotock or something like that they did see that's the thing you know when you look at people who have a lot of money why they do they go out spend it on rolexes uh and um you know just just the the what they have on just take a i'll just say this go back and look at how much alex jones needs to live every month i mean it's it's a public record now. The court filings is like, what?

But of course, you know, he's making that kind of money as well. So, yeah, don't get yourself in that kind of trap. And God has protected us from that. It's protected us from getting rich. But we really do appreciate your support. And so if you'd like to support us, subscribe star is one of the great ways to do that. And, um, and, uh, we really do appreciate that even though we don't mention the people by name, because there's, um, over 300 that, uh, support us on subscribe star.

So we don't read out the names on a regular basis, but we really do appreciate that. Uh, even at the lowest level, lowest level that's more than we would make on our ads if you watched every one of the ads um and every episode for a month it wouldn't be close to a dollar that we make uh so um you know five dollars that's great. We really do appreciate that. A Florida doctor removed the wrong organ from a patient, resulting in immediate catastrophic death. See, this is the state of medicine right now. Ignorant, mercenary, greedy.

And William Bryan of Alabama was visiting the Florida Panhandle last month when he suddenly began experiencing lower left abdominal pain. He and his wife Beverly went to the Ascension Sacred Heart Emerald Coast Hospital. Between Pensacola and Panama City, doctors were concerned about an abnormality in his spleen. They admitted him for further testing, said the family's lawyer. They told him that if he left the hospital he could face serious complications if he stayed in the hospital he could get even more serious complications but that's the way they always work right you've got this pain or this whatever it is situation that's the bad cop and they use use the fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

And then they bring in the guys with the white coats and the expensive equipment. And they're the good cop. They're going to fix everything for you. Well, in this particular case, there was a hand-assisted laparoscopic spleenectomy. And yet, what happened was the doctor, Shachnovskyky removed his liver instead of his spleen.

I don't know if they even have a name for that because nobody would do that. You're going to remove the spleen, but you can't, if you move the liver and the liver ectomy, uh, instead of a spleen ectomy um that's uh just murder the surgical snafu resulted in immediate and catastrophic blood loss resulting in death say the lawyers after erroneously removing his liver the surgeon labeled the organ as a spleen that's it he pronounced it a spleen it was only identified as a spleen. That's it. They pronounced it a spleen. It was only identified as a liver after the man's death. And of course, I have mentioned before,

my parents had a friend who underwent abdominal surgery. And a few days later, he's in a lot of pain. And looks down, he sees like this, you know, object pointing there. It's like, well, I'm not pregnant. Maybe something was left inside of me. It goes back to the doctor. He says, doctor, I think you'll love something inside of me. The doctor looks at it and he goes, no, no, no, that's not what it is. And he walks out, just walks out of the room.

His entire career flashed before his eyes. That's what this guy is doing. That is a spleen. I'm sticking to that story. And it was, by the way, it was a tool and he did survive. And I don't know that he sued the doctor. Back in the day, that's not really what people did all that time. Sounds like that doctor has some spleen in to do lucy you got some spleen in to do uh shaknovsky allegedly told beverly bryan that her husband's

spleen was so diseased that it was four times bigger than usual and had migrated to the other side of his body this guy must have failed basic anatomy i mean this is a tragedy i don't want to make fun of uh the loss but what i'm talking about here is the medical community as many people say what do you call the guy who finishes last in his medical class? Doctor. I think that would be this guy. It was so big, it even moved to the other side of his body. Where the liver would normally be. I just don't understand what's going on. In a typical human body, the liver is located on the upper right side of the abdominal cavity above the stomach um right of the kidneys and intestines the spleen is up is

located on the upper left of the abdomen next to the stomach well he just gets his left and right mixed up i guess completely understandable and is significantly smaller than the liver between two and a half to three pounds lighter and roughly the size of a fist. So the law firm alleged that the doctor also performed a previous quote, wrong site surgery unquote last year, in which he was accused of removing a portion of a patient's pancreas instead of performing an adrenal gland reaction or resection rather as intended. That case was settled. So they don't know the terms were not disclosed.

But this guy had previously cut out the wrong thing before, just last year. And he stayed in the hospital. See, this is the state of medicine. And this is the state of these public health doctors that did the lockdown, isn't it? Right? They removed the wrong things from us. They removed everything from us, quite frankly. They gave us the wrong medicines, but not by mistake. It was intentional. The problem is, is that we've not done a bureaucracy ectomy you know a bureau ectomy we haven't removed the we're going to cut out the bureaucracy we got to remove it

like a diseased organ because that's what it is it's like a tumor it's like a cancer and we haven't removed the bureaucracy as As a matter of fact, by leaving it there, it has grown and multiplied, and it's going to be coming back in a vicious way. You want to talk about turbo cancer? That's what the bureaucracy is. We're going to have turbo bureaucracy. And it's going to be happening in the federal government regardless of whether it's Trump or La La. Because it happened under Trump. because it happened under trump and it happened under la la and nobody has been held to account so of course it's going to continue to

grow by leaps and bounds and the difference between the two candidates is which cancers they want to accelerate which areas of our life do they want to invade and destroy with their bureaucratic tumors? Government is a turbo cancer. This is a good analogy. Years ago in North Carolina, we were running, if you know anything about kudzu, it's an invasive plant species that was brought in during fdr's new deal they want to give people something to do so i said hey plant kudzu hyacinths are another thing that they brought in in florida clogged up waterways and they can't get rid of them uh but it's an

invasive species now because it's not native and and it grows incredibly fast it can grow two or three feet a day and um had uh one of the guys that was with me in the libertarian party when he was running for office he made the analogy he said government is like kudzu you know it's really really really hard to get rid of and it grows so fast well i think a better analogy today is turbo cancer that's very much like kudzu and so um uh as i said earlier you have now talk about things growing um these um these long fibrous clots that are filling up arteries that embalmers are finding in dead people. They're also finding that these things continue to grow after the person is dead. Here's an embalmer talking about the fibrous growth post-mortem.

Here we have some unnatural clots that were taken from the arteries of a deceased today for us simply for us to be able to embalm them. We are going to dispose of them but it's just to illustrate what we are finding inside the arteries of the vaccinated deceased in our care. This isn't normal. This doesn't grow post-mortem. It's time somebody got a backbone and some moral compass and actually spoke out and was honest. This has got to stop. Yeah, it does.

It does. But we don't stop it, do we? Just like that doctor, right? He got his anatomy confused and cut out the wrong thing a year ago and leaves him there. Now he's just killed somebody because they left him there. And the idea that these things would continue to grow post-mortem, what is it? What is it that is there? As he said, it's time for somebody with a backbone to speak out.

We all need to speak out. And I know that many of you have a backbone as well many of you did not take the jab and uh we all have to speak out about this uh but um it's absolutely insane that this continues to go and why does it continue to go well a good example of this is in australia australia has put together an inquiry, a commission, if you will. You know, they always do these inquiries. The UK has done an inquiry about it. Of course, in the US, nobody's even asking enough questions for them to bother to do an inquiry.

Typically, we call them a commission. We had the Kennedy assassination commission. We had the 9-11 commission. And they're there to cover up and to assuage people to lie to us. Because there's nothing to worry about. Yeah. We found a magic bullet. You know, it hit this person. Then it changed.

And it goes over, hits that person, another person, another person. You know, all these different things with the Kennedy assassination. Oh, look, we've got a nist simulation that says that steel buildings can just collapse on their own without even being hit with a plane yeah you believe that stuff this is the kind of stuff that's coming up with these inquiries and um and so we had a ridiculous inquiry in the UK and now in Australia, they have an inquiry into the excess deaths. And what they did there to rig that process was to suppress the majority of the submissions. Two thirds of the submissions made to the Australian government's excess mortality inquiry have been suppressed and key evidence has been omitted.

It's in the U S we just call them commissions because, uh, these people that make up the commission, you know, the Warren commission or whatever, they're involved in the commission of a crime. So I just call it a commission. Uh, the world's first inquiry set out to investigate why record high numbers of Australians have died in recent years, including non COVID deaths at levels not seen since World War II. On Friday, the Excess Mortality Inquiry Committee handed down its report, concluding that COVID was the key driver of Australian excess mortality,

both directly and indirectly, and not the bioweapon shots of course now the problem with that is that we had a lot of people who had no flu symptoms who died the problem is it with it is that you know for a year and a half to two years they didn't have the excess death until the vaccines were brought out and so you have people who are not dying of COVID, and it's happening not at the front end of the cleave. Remember the cleave? The cleave, something comes in, and now everybody's dying from it. And then it does a bell-shaped curve, and it tapers off and goes away, right?

Except that, you know, this didn't happen that way. It didn't happen when they discovered it. Didn't happen in 2020. Didn't happen most of 2021. Happened at the tail end of 2021 and the beginning of 2022 is when these deaths were happening. And they weren't dying of COVID. So the commission says they died of COVID, not of the vaccine.

It's come to light that the committee buried the majority of submissions made to the inquiry, acknowledging only 31% of the submissions received on the public page. Key evidence raised in the process has been entirely omitted from their report. Australia saw incredibly high excess mortality that could not be entirely explained by COVID. Couldn't be explained at all by COVID. Again, should have happened at the beginning of the cave. Leading to calls for further government investigation. Excess deaths peaked in 2022 at 12% excess deaths, an extra 20,200 deaths above the expected baseline. Excess mortality remained high throughout 2023 at 5%.

That's an excess of 8,400 deaths. Former Actuaries Institute spokesperson said mortality doesn't normally vary by more than 1% to 2%. So the excess mortality seen by Australia during the pandemic years is way higher, way higher. And of course, we've already had that mentioned in the United States insurance company said the deaths that happened in the third and fourth quarter of 2021 and they said this beginning of 2022 so it doesn't mean that they didn't continue to grow but the one American insurance company a big insurance company of Indiana CEO said this is he had to explain because it's a publicly held company.

He had to explain why the profits were down. Maybe he needed to explain why the profits were up, but the morticians and funeral homes and things like that. Anyway, he said, this is more than three standard deviations away from the mean. And this is an event that we would not expect to have happen more than once every 200 years. And when something like that does happen, it's usually a war. In this case, it was a war.

It was a war by the governments against their own people. The Australian government against its people. The New Zealand government against its people. The Canadian government, the UK government, all the European governments, and especially the American government against those people, the Canadian government, the UK government, all the European governments, and especially the American government against the world. Against the world. So COVID did it. Devil made me do it.

Now, yeah. Did COVID do lockdowns? Did COVID do the debt, the massive debt? Yeah, COVID did everything. Trump didn't have anything to do with it. Biden didn't have anything to it's a covid covid uh ironically the actuaries note that the majority of these deaths occurred after the vast majority of the population was vaccinated so usually it's only gonna the mortality is only gonna vary by one or two percent up or down and so if you look at what happened um in 2020 when the pandemic hit mortality was down by three percent down three percent

usually varies one or two percent it was down three percent the worst pandemic the world has ever seen that required the heaviest hand the world has ever seen and every single government and yet excess deaths went down or the number of deaths went down so you had an excess deaths of um minus three percent uh 5241 fewer deaths in the pandemic year of 2020 when it was the worst when when we were the most defenseless. We had no vaccine to save us whatsoever. We were at the mercy of the COVID virus. And you had 3% fewer people die that year.

In 2021, you had 1.5% higher. Then the vaccines hit. And it went up to 11.7% and continued to be at 5.1% in 2023. But yeah, it wasn't the politicians. It wasn't their bioweapon. It was the COVID thing. It must have been those Chinese. That's who we'll blame it on, right?

The lab leak and the Chinese. So it was definitely not the vaccines. Despite receiving large amounts of correspondence in relation to vaccine injuries, the committee dedicated only a single-pages report to discussion of the potential impact of the vaccines and killing people. The committee rejected concerns raised

about the impact of the vaccines on excess mortality because of two reasons. Number one, official data shows that the vaccines have only killed 16 Australians. Oh, there you go. That's your first reason because we say so. Official data says it only killed 16 Australians.

Number two, the actuaries Institute said that in fact COVID-19 vaccines have significantly reduced excess mortality. Oh yeah. The problem is, you know, we save tens of billions of lives all over the world, but I can't talk about it because our base,

our beautiful base of which some of you are there. You get angry when we mentioned the word vaccine, don't get angry. You did everything you could to get this vaccine out. I know it was one of the greatest achievements we did in less than nine months to be able to do that. But now it's taken a twist, right? And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it. That's right, Candace. Don't challenge it. Don't challenge it. Let him get away with that lie. She makes a big bucks, too, I tell you. Yeah, we all

know what has to be done, don't we? And we know what they're doing, don't we? Yeah, so it significantly reduced excess mortality, but all of that happened, the excess mortality happened after the deployment of the bioweapon so it got worse hey please explain that they cited a single modeling study from new south wales data

one computer model well we had one computer model to lock down the world now we can have one model to rule us all with lies uh the actuaries extrapolated to estimate that the vaccines saved more than 50,000 lives naturally. Millions of people's lives saved worldwide by the Trump shot, as the father of the vaccine just explained to you.

The study contains too many flaws to list in full. The main ones, however, are the miscategorization of anyone within 21 days of their first dose of vaccine to die. Right. And we've seen this everywhere as well. You are not counted in the United States. You're not counted as vaccinated until two. I think it was two weeks. It might have been three.

I think it's two weeks after your second shot. So if you get the vaccine and you drop dead immediately, which a lot of people did, that doesn't count. You died of COVID. I'm sure you died of COVID. Didn't die of the vaccine though, even though you get the shot and drop dead. Nope.

You got to wait two weeks before you drop dead or, you know, you're not vaccinated the fda meanwhile has authorized yet another covet shot that yet again has had no clinical data no testing whatsoever on humans the fda has approved a new injection for covid from novavax. This is the one that Peter McCullough is so excited about too, by the way. Oh, Novavax. That's good.

Moderna, Pfizer. They're not good, but Novavax, that's great. That's really great. Yeah. Take the untested Novavax vaccine because McCullough likes it.

The Novavax injection was authorized for public use without any clinical trial data being provided whatsoever what they do a computer model they even call that you know they have in vitro and vivo and silico yeah it's silly all right isn't it did you do this based on it's not silicon it is a silicon to believe these computer models uh covet 19 not being treated as a threat to public health and yet the fda went ahead and rushed this through dr peter marks who directs the fda's center for biologics Evaluation and Research. Well, that sounds very impressive, doesn't it? Said today's authorization provides an additional COVID vaccine option that meets the FDA standards.

Anything, zero standards. If you show up and pay the right people, you meet their standards. How much is that? Meets the FDA standards for safety effectiveness and manufacturing quality needed to support emergency use authorization what emergency there is no covid and yet they're still doing this still giving emergency use authorization for this stuff the Fraud and Drug Administration. That's what they are, the FDA. Shut that cesspool down.

Lock those people up as an example to make sure that this doesn't happen again. That's one of the most fraudulent things. Give it an emergency use authorization. There is no emergency at all with this. Just last month the fraudulent drug administration fda cleared new covid mrna shots from moderna and pfizer so now it's novavax turn to feed at the trough that's what it's about barbara low fisher co-founder and president of

the national vaccine information center said the assertion rings hollow when the FDA the fraud and drug administration has not required manufacturers of mRNA biological products to provide scientific evidence to the public the safety and effectiveness has been demonstrated so it's not science if you haven't done that. If you've got somebody, a doctor, Peter Marks, a Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, very impressive title. And if he says it, then it's like a pronouncement from the Astronomer Royal. And we all just do what he says because it's an argument from authority, not from data data not from evaluation

and that's what francis bacon when he gave us the scientific method he criticized this whole idea of arguments from authority because you wind up with fraudulent drug administration no Novavax president said in a statement, and also the CEO, that the company's vaccine showed quote, robust cross-reactivity against JN.1 lineage viruses in animals because it's untested in humans. You are the guinea pig if you take this stuff. But the reality is that even by their own standards, they say that this strain, this JN.1, is no longer relevant. So they're inconsistent with their own contrived, arbitrary, lying standards. They can't even be consistent with that.

They're making this stuff up. They're making up the lies. And even in this kingdom of lies, this is pure fiction. According to the sequence performed by the CDC, JN.1 was displaced in the

spring by KP.3 and other variants. So it's all BS..1 that's what it is 0.10 this is our 11 it's off the scale it's bs11 total uh extreme bs so in rotterdam a dutch daily newspaper as you're getting ready to put out the new Corona vaccines, they asked their readers, are you going to get another Corona prick? That's what they call it. I think over here in the U.S. that refers to the person giving the vaccine. People like Fauci, they are the Corona pricks.

Uh, just say no to those pricks in the white coat. And people are saying no to the Corona pricks in the vial as well. Uh, V I A L V I L E. Uh, what's notable is that so far the outlet has not censored the comments. And there are a lot of negative comments.

You will find this on expose news.com. Listen to what people had to say. Almost 700 people answered it. Are you going to get the new vaccine? Well, here's what they had to say. No, never again. That only makes me sick. Another no, definitely not.

I belong to the risk group. I had my fourth stroke two weeks after the booster shot. Hadn't had a stroke in 10 years. Another one. No, certainly not. I used to get Pfizer because I used to go abroad during the corona period. That caused me an autoimmune disease. My endocrinologist confirmed to me that it was Pfizer. So you will never convince me again.

Another one. I plan not to be vaccinated anymore. I wonder if that means all vaccines. I had four, but after the Pfizer vaccination, I had a CVA a few weeks later. This was later mentioned as a possible side effect of course you cannot prove that it was this vaccine but is it pure coincidence another one pedro no i had brain attack shortly after the vaccination i'm not saying that was the cause but you shouldn't take the risk fred in my network there are all symptoms of. Heart attacks, some of them fatal. Autoimmune diseases. All have received the corona vaccination. So what do you think, he says.

Are you going to take it? What do you think? Gerard. There will be no corona vaccine here. Many young people around me have died of bleeding from the brain and other unpleasant diseases associated with these vaccinations. Willem. I was just a healthy boy. I had a brain attack. One of the most, one of the more honest doctors said it could have been due to the vaccines

I did, including the many older customers. So no more Corona vaccinations for me. Martine, after a friend had a cerebral hemorrhage the day after the vaccination, I no longer need it. No longer need it no longer need it b schumacher after my wife suffered cerebral damage after the last booster shot became very sick and i cared for at home for a year she decided to help her die at the age of 65 again these are translations from the dutch so they're a bit crude you really don't know what you're vaccinated with no more boosters for me so his wife became uh crippled

and um had uh assisted suicide uh if absolutely no longer i have been disabled since my first syringe now i probably have to take medication for the rest of my life. Hans. No, I can't get a syringe anymore. I had a heart attack a year and a half ago. The doctor said the three Corona vaccinations were a possible cause. Uh, Louise said, I know I already have three vaccines and the last booster shot behind me. I had a heart attack last year and now I'm a cardiac patient. I wouldn't associate it directly with a vaccine, but I'm taking so many medications now that I think it's enough. Andre, after the first vaccination with AstraZeneca, I had many complaints, pulmonary embolism.

A doctor said if we hadn't done that, there could have been more fatal accidents. You see? Fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Do what I say. Yeah. In other words, you were just unlucky mirjam no because since the last vaccine i have chronic inflammation of mucus membrane in my throat and i have to cough constantly i spoke to a doctor he said this is one of the side effects

that people don't talk about chris last one never never again with this moderna crap i nearly escaped the disaster syringe was a syringe was enough to cause me terrible pain for 14 days i couldn't go anywhere well in the u.s tim waltz offered parents cash to do this to their children as young as five years old. He once pushed the corona vaccines so hard that he offered cash to parents who gave their children as young as five the shot, says Breitbart. Breitbart is talking about this. Did Breitbart ever do an article on DeWine in Ohio? Hey, you've got a lottery now. now you got a chance to win a million

dollars or you might die or be disabled for the rest of your life you want to step right up and roll the dice right spin the wheel big pfizer wheel up there no they never talked about the wine uh you know i'm glad they're talking about Tim Walz, but let me say this. The only motivation that Breitbart has, Breitbart, you got people like John Nolte, who was a vaccine cheerleader. I'll never forget. This is a guy whose beat, his expertise is culture and movies. And he's out there lecturing everybody with all of the latest stuff from trump and fauci i'll never

forget how people are getting really hostile to him on breitbart in the comments boy they're really coming after him rightfully so breitbart has been a big cheerleader of this unless it's the democrats in january 22 waltz proudly announced a vaccine incentive program. Kids deserve to be shot. No, kids deserve a shot. And so, yeah, he said he offered $200 to families who brought their kids ages 5 to 11 to get vaccinated. Big news. Starting this month, families who get their 5 to 11-year-olds vaccinated

can get $200. I don't know how that's less than five pieces of silver or 30 pieces of silver, even in today's devalued dollar. That's cash in your pocket for starting the year off right by protecting your child from COVID, said Tim Walz. The administration offered a $200 Visa card to gift card to Minnesota families who got their children in that age group fully vaccinated. In order to be eligible,

parents or guardians were required to ensure that the children had both the first and the second shots two of them between january the first and february 28th at the time the justification was the omicron surge you remember that remember when they did that i'll never forget it that's the first time i had taken a break from the program. And it was a week after Thanksgiving. Tony Arderman filled in for me. And the information broke about this new Omicron variant. And I said, oh, give me a break. And even though Tony was doing the program, I cut a short video and sent it to him. I said, put this up.

You know, people, don't be fooled by this Omicron stuff. Well, that was what Tim Walz was justifying all this on. That was a reason to push vaccinations onto children. As Omicron surges across our nation, we're continuing to use every resource we have to keep our families safe and healthy. Yeah, he's a cynical liar, just like Trump. And just like Lala.

Kids deserve a shot, he said. Well, you know, Breitbart gives Trump a pass when he pushes it on people. Tells him, you know, gives him incentives. And see, this is exactly what, Waltz was not saying, the only thing that the Republicans will criticize, well, Trump didn't make people do it. Well, he gave them incentives, and he gave incentives to people to gaslight them and to nudge them to do it

and to tell them that it was their Christian duty to their neighbor, to love their neighbor and go get a shot and all the rest of the stuff. Trump was paying out a $200 dollar ad council campaign to do that and so um you're going to criticize waltz waltz did not force anybody to get this he didn't say uh get it or we're going to kick your kid out of school even i mean he didn't use coercion and of course the democrats like to say well we didn't mandate it. If we had mandated it, we would have done what Trump supporter Alan Dershowitz said. We would have sent somebody to your door, drug you out of your house, pinned you to the ground and injected you. Well, that's that's a mandate.

No, we just used coercion and arm twisting to do it. Well, in this particular case, he used a positive incentive, just like Trump and the Republicans. The people, my people are so smart. And you know what else they say about my people? The polls. They say, I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that?

Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay? It's like incredible. Or he could shoot and kill the world, and he wouldn't lose any voters not a single one not even these maga tarts none of them they will never call him out breitbart will never call him out alex won't call him out wnd won't call him out now the new american won't call him out

zero hedge won't call him out nobody will call him out. I'm just a cranky old guy because I'll call him out, I guess. That's what I keep getting told. Yeah, not going to get past this. Not going to give this guy pardon. He doesn't want one. He wants credit for what he did. Why would you give him a pardon? Getting our children, says Tim Walls,

getting our children 5 to, Tim walls, giving our, getting our children five to 11 years old, vaccinated, gives them critical protection against severe illness and hospitalization and keeps them in school. $200 cash in your pocket right now, step right up for getting the easy vaccination done at the start of the year.

He said, and so Breitbart says well this comes as walls ironically touts a quote mind your own damn business unquote slogan on the campaign trail but again trump's okay because he didn't mandate he just incentivized it right so why does breitbart criticize one and not the other for doing exactly the same thing? They're both despicable, but why don't they criticize that? And so when you look at the, I found that picture I was talking about 1986, look at this for kids in the first 12 months of life, uh, 1986, you would get three DPT shots at two, four, and six months.

You'd get an oral polio vaccine at two months and at four months. But look where we are at 2024. You got one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. Let's just say that you got about 35 shots there in the first year. From birth to 12 months. This is what Trump was railing to RFK Jr. about on the phone. Hey, just load them up with all these shots. I mean, I don't know how many of them it is. So I need you to bring some sanity back to this stuff.

Well, why didn't Trump stop it the first time around? And why didn't he put RFK Jr. He called RFK Jr. to the Trump Tower. Why didn't he put him on a team then to stop all this stuff? Because Trump had talked about that before he got elected president in 2016 he talked about all of that stuff and then he brings um rfk jr in to talk about that except uh when pfizer gave him a million dollars and these other then he just um said bye-bye and he puts the ceo of eli lilly in charge He was just negotiating and haggling for the price.

But we have a moral responsibility. I see in one Christian publication after the other, you have a moral responsibility to vote for Trump. Do you? You really want to believe that character doesn't matter? You really want to believe what he has to say about any policy statements? If character doesn't matter, how can you trust him on any policy issue? Because he lied about all of them the first time through.

Well, close contacts of MPOC's cases are now being quarantined for 21 days in Singapore. You see, this is not going to end. And how do we do this? All politics is local. All quarantines are local. All face masks are local. All of these mandates, all these coercions are local. Therefore, vote for the federal level.

That's where all your solutions are in the federal level. Really? So we're going to talk about that when we come back. But first, when we come back, we're going to talk about the grifter gate. What's going on with these people? These very well-known so-called conservatives are just Trump sycophants. I'm going to call them conservative commentators. They're Trump sycophants to the man, every last one of them,

just sucking on Trump in the most disgusting ways. We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. ORGAN PLAYS In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to The David Knight Show. Griftergate, a new indictment from the FBI, which is conservative media company took millions of Kremlin cash. Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Lauren Southern, Benny Johnson have all worked with this company, Tenant Media. Well, let me just say,

I've got a very different take on this than everybody else does i think this is about completely different issues than everybody else is bringing up and i have a theory about why this is showing up at this point in time because there's nothing about this in the mainstream alternative media they're avoiding this and just like there's nothing in the mainstream media about the ccp and their agent on the inside who was the deputy chief of staff the number two person and hokal's staff the new york governor mainstream media is ignoring that mainstream alternative media is ignoring this what dostream alternative media is ignoring this. What do they have in common? Well, they're alternative narratives.

One of them, the boogeyman is China. The other one, the boogeyman is Russia. And they're boogeymen. Let's understand they are boogeymen. They're bad. Okay. But having said that, the FBI's purpose in doing this on both sides, in my opinion, is to lay a foundation for future censorship. In the same way, when they come after TikTok, it's because they ultimately want to come after the connections of the CCP in New York, and then the next day you see this coming out about connections to Russia

through the media, they're laying the foundation for fear and certainty, doubt and censorship is what they're laying the foundation for. Oh, we got to control this because we've got these foreign powers that are trying to manipulate our election. Well, you know, we could do something about it. We could have more free speech instead of less free speech.

We could have an honest election. We could have open ballots. We could have open debates. No, we're not going to have any of that. They don't have the candidates debate each other. Now they don't want you debating each other. They don't want you debating the candidates. Got to shut up. Just listen to what they have to say. A federal indictment unsealed yesterday

alleges that a Tennessee-based media company, which played home to several prominent right-leaning online commentators, was secretly a Russian government-backed influence operation. The company was accused of receiving nearly $10 million from Russia Today, a Russian state-backed media company, as part of, quote, a scheme to create and distribute content to the U.S. audiences with hidden Russian government messaging, said Attorney General Merrick Garland. Well, let me just say this. You know, RT has been purged and banned from a lot of different places.

I can still find it, and I still look at their articles, and some of them are obviously propaganda. I've said for the longest time, Russia will lie to you. RT will lie to you about everything that's happening in Russia, and they'll probably lie to you about what's going

on in Ukraine as well. But they'll tell you the truth about the other side. You know, when you've got a war situation with Ukraine and Russia, everybody's lying about everything. It's the same thing that we're seeing with Israel and Gaza. It's just, it's some people are telling the truth,

but it's impossible to sort the truth out in the middle of a war. Because both sides are using so much lies and propaganda. That's why I don't really talk about these two things that much. Except to say, look, we've got to stop it. Or it's going to get out of control. We've got to stop it in both places. But you can look at Russia today.

And you can look at other news media. Look, the bias is obvious, isn't it? So many people pretend that, well, people are going to go to pick a site. They're going to go to CNN or they're going to go to Fox News or they're going to go to Breitbart or they're going to go to, you know, pick another site and they're going to believe everything they see there. Well, some people may be like that. Some people may depend only on one news source. That's one of the reasons why you don't look at one news source. I look at more

than four dozen a day. And when you look at four dozen a day, you start to see a pattern evolve and you start to see biases evolve and start to see the fact that one group will talk about this and completely avoid what was the top story for the other group and vice versa. You have a Hegelian media now. Both sides are trying to manipulate each other. And I've talked about this in the sense that it's gone beyond just uh you know telling people what they want to hear what they're and doing it for money because that's how this started it's a self-interest of these people in both these media groups telling people what they want to hear for money so i call it grifter gate but now it's gotten to the point where people who only look at mainstream media sources or people only look at mainstream alternative media sources have completely different view of what's going on.

They never hear this other side over here. They never see the negative news about this. They never see the negative polls. Even when you look at the polls, the expectations of who's going to win of course both of them both sides are telling you that the most important thing in your life right now is the presidential election and it is not it's it's not even important i'm telling you the presidential election is the least important thing in your life oh heresy they say, they say. Yes. Well, as I said before, unless you live in seven states, your vote doesn't even matter. And it probably doesn't

matter in those states because you're assuming if it matters, you're assuming that there's only going to be a one vote margin. You're assuming that the votes are going to be counted. Honestly, are you serious? You seriously think your vote counts? counts come on talk to me about it let's have that argument i'll talk to you about it uh what absolute and utter nonsense but your vote can make a difference at a local election and the more local the election is the more your vote or your contribution is going to matter and that's where all politics is. All politics is local. That's why they want you focused exclusively on the presidential election and why they're

feeding you two different narratives. Both of these sides think that their candidate is ahead. Both of these sides have polls or some other metric or some other election expert who says uh lala is going to win or benedict donald is going to win it's their own uh their own narrative that they're building oh look uh they're ahead in the polls and then one of them will say well okay we're behind in the national polls but we're ahead in enough of the battleground states that we're going to win or whatever they always have a way that whether you're talking about cnn or you're talking about breitbart they

will come up with statistics that'll show their candidate and their bias is so obvious how could anybody miss it unless they're your only news source or unless you only go to other news sources like them. So, you know, but what they're doing is they're creating an expectation that it's a slam dunk for our guy to win. So when our guy does not win and that's going to happen to one of the two sides, then they're ready to go to war over it that's what's so dangerous about this it's not only stupid it's dangerously stupid and so um benny johnson tweeted that he and other influencers had been victims in the alleged scheme and of course the indictment says that they were the indictment doesn't accuse them of any wrongdoing uh tim pool echoed that line he said quote should these allegations prove true i as well as other personalities and commentators

were deceived and are victims dave rubin also described himself as a victim he said i knew absolutely nothing i know nothing about this fraudulent activity, period. So it was RT and some of their employees. Now, again, RT has got their own take on things, their own spin on things. And don't they all? I mean, is RT any more of a propaganda organization than the New York Times, the Washington Post, or CNN, or Fox, or Fox or Breitbart or Infowars. I'm absolutely not.

They've got their own bias. And if you really want to be informed, you take a look at all this stuff. That's what Gerald Salendi does, right? It's what I've done for years. You know, Gerald looks, he gets, he subscribes to all these papers and everything else out there. Then he looks at the data himself and he applies critical thought discernment things like that you know that's the way you do the news you look at both sides and then you make your

determination based on your experience based on your discernment and based on what is clearly their bias and there is a bias even in what they talk about and what they talk about now it is they are completely orthogonal to each other. There is no overlap. If you've got a Venn diagram, these circles aren't even touching. You've got two completely different universes that people are reading,

and that's a very dangerous thing. But RT is no more, no less propaganda than all the mainstream media sites, than all the mainstream alternative media sites. you've just got to sort it out by the way i talked about gerald if you go to trendsjournal.com you can save 10 off of a subscription if you use the code name night and let him know that you came through me 10 off it means that you'll pay only uh just over two dollars a week versus five dollars a day for something like the wall street journal uh gerald reads the wall street journal so you don't have to

and that's that's enough right there you know he reads all these horrible publications that are uh you know a lot of uh propaganda on both sides of everything and so you don't have to read them but of course you can and he does quote his sources and tells you why he has that but he focuses he doesn't focus on the fluff either he focuses on the trends of geopolitics and economics so again trendsjournal.com 10 off if you use the code Knight. Well, again, it's not hard to sort through this stuff if you really want to, but the founders of Tenet Media are Lauren Chin and her husband. Chin is an influencer and a YouTuber who has hosted a show on Blaze TV.

She's affiliated with Glenn Beck she's also affiliated with Turning Point USA hmm okay well there he is another guy that's all about the money you know it's amazing her husband identifies himself on Twitter as a president of Tenet media on on rumble radis bro thank you very much uh appreciate the tip uh how do i get to be a victim who receives millions of dollars see that's what i'm trying to work out yeah it's like it's like uh make me a victim take my wife please as any say well make me a victim please uh this is crazy yeah charlie kirk they were turning point usa millions and millions a year that he makes as well uh so anyway um they shared a video

in a company discord channel of what the indictment calls a quote well-known u.s political commentator visiting a grocery store in Russia. Well, we know who that is. Tucker Carlson, right? Later that day, the indictment says producer one. We don't know who that is because they referred to some of these people, you know, Dave Rubin, Tim pool, these guys that referred to as like commentator one commentator to commentator three, that type of stuff. So producer one gets a thing sent to him from the people

that are going to be paying them a hundred thousand dollars per podcast or in the case of uh benny johnson uh four hundred thousand dollars per podcast one podcast one podcast instead of years of three hours a day five days a week it's like what is going on i don't think i'm doing this wrong here i don't know what's going on i gotta i gotta pick sides and suck up to somebody come on this is a so anyway tucker carlson video about him going grocery shopping in russia and um so the person replied and says, sharing this just feels like overt shilling. Yeah, because Tucker was shilling.

That was one of the most cringy things. Well, all of that stuff that he did in Russia. Now he goes into the subway. It's like, look at how wonderful the subway is, you know, and it's got crown molding and things like that's like great okay and then he zooms in on a mosaic of linen of linen it's like didn't your cia dad tell you any better about that do they not like linden or do they like linen i don't know the cia maybe they do they share a lot of the same attributes don't they um that made me want to puke as well tucker you're

zooming in on linen there's this wonderful place there uh and then he goes grocery shopping isn't it wonderful they got groceries in russia wow and grocery stores uh he says it feels like overt shilling uh but then um founder two replied that founder one thinks that we should put it out there. And so then the producer who had said this feels like I'm shilling said, OK, I'll put it out tomorrow. Oh, see, that's how this works. Already, they're starting to have some influence with them. But as they point out, Tim Pool said, look, I do my own content here. Nobody told me anything to put in there yet.

And I don't think that they probably did at that point. It's going to be a gradual process. They get you hooked on the money. Then they tell you, okay, now I want you to put this spin on it uh so at an aspen institute event an aspen institute event where's that coming from it's just like this guy that uh got all this big money to run non-stop tv ads on fox and everything against frank nicely in the state senate race where do you get his money from well he get his money from? Well, he got his money from the Walton family. And this person who's very big at the Aspen Institute,

you got a Republican, big out of state money given to a Republican to defeat a genuine conservative Republican, somebody who's connected to the Aspen Institute. So now they're going to push forward this guy as a Republican in the final election. So you've got a choice between a Democrat and a guy who is a wolf in sheep's clothing running as a Republican in the general election.

The Aspen Institute. One of the last things Tenet posted on their social media sites before the indictment was unsealed, concerned, ironically enough, enough says and this is coming from mother jones radical left publication ironically enough they talked about a government employee accused of secretly acting as a foreign agent now listen the way mother jones talks about this dismissing it tenet posted a video of linda sun a former aide to New York governors, Andrew Cuomo and Kathy Hochul, who has been charged with using her position to benefit the Chinese government.

Tenant seemed to suggest that a few words, the sun offered on a video call endorsing diversity, equity, inclusion measures were part of an alleged foreign backed messaging plot. So what's the worry about all this stuff? She's being paid by the ccp to influence new york governors but hey this is what we see as inclusivity and diversity here in the united states that's their excuse for it you see how how polarized everything is just like bright

will make excuses for trump for doing for bribing people or completely ignore the fact that he bribed governors to do this stuff or completely ignore that republican governors bribe people they'll focus on waltz bribing people yeah yeah focus on that but here they just completely dismiss this issue about the Chinese Communist Party infiltration of the New York state government at the highest level. Just push it away. And then they focus on this other thing. And folks, nothing really happened in either of these events. Nothing really happened with this Chinese communist agent from what they've got in the indictment so far i mean what this person was doing was telling making sure that the new

york government the government and the governor's office did not say anything at all about taiwan or acknowledge any gifts from taiwan or any of that kind of stuff it was just there to tell them to shut up about taiwan and to make sure that nothing was said about taiwan because taiwan's got to not exist that's what they had her there for because nobody you know Kathy Hochul and Cuomo they don't know anything the Chinese want to know anything about and the same thing is happening on this side by the way the employees are coming from RT one of them is called Kalashnikov I'm not being suspicious at all. Anyway, the big story, in my opinion, is the amount of dollars that are paid to these conservative influencers to shill.

And they're being paid those big dollars. Whether those big dollars are coming from RT or from some billionaire backer of Trump i don't really care when you look at the fact that travis kelsey and his brother have gotten a contract that is like the size of joe rogan's contract to have a podcast i mean they're going to get paid tens of millions a year just like joe rogan and a multi-year contract you know know, hundreds of millions of dollars that are going to get paid. To me, that's the big story. That's the grifter gate that you're going to be influenced by people who are being paid tens of millions of dollars a year.

What are they being? Why do they find such favor with these organizations like Spotify who won't even carry my podcast? They've banned me. They won't allow my podcast on their platform, period. Not that they won't pay me. They won't even allow my podcast there. And how are these people then paying, you know, a boyfriend of Taylor swift and a former comedian and martial arts guy who knows nothing he's always a stunt just like tucker really well it's not wow wow um but they

know they know they're influencing people why is that happening you know we saw this with small influencers on youtube uh the trump administration administration was paying small influencers on YouTube to push COVID fear, to push vaccine hope. They were paying these people to do interviews with Fauci and all the rest of this stuff. These are people who overall were very small in terms of their audience, but they were still getting paid to interview Fauci to push this stuff out there. So, you know, it's the money, the money. It's kind of like that old joke, you know, the guy's going, every day he's going across the border. And the border patrol agents think this guy's really up to something.

He's smuggling something. We can't figure, I mean, we've checked him out. We've got the dogs on him. They can't smell any drugs, nothing in there. Finally, what somebody realizes is he's got a different bicycle every day. He's smuggling bicycles across the border. See, this isn't about Russia and China. This is about internal wars of the American government against you to manipulate your opinion. And these people are willing participants in it. They'll take, once you start taking this kind of money,

you'll say anything to keep that kind of money going. And so as a good example of it, and I've played this before, but Tim Pool, for example, Tim Pool and Laura Loomer, look at what they did when they were challenged by luke grudowski why can't trump just come out and tell people the truth that the vaccines are bad tell people i made a mistake oh that'll never happen and so and we know that's not going to happen why because he's a narcissist he's never going to admit that people in power will never admit to a mistake they'll make multiple mistakes rather than admit to one. But you have Tim Pool and Laura Loomer cover for him.

Cover for him. We need an acknowledgment from Donald about what happened to Operation Warp Speed. There's been a lot of Americans that have been injured. One of them was here at the time. I'm so sick of talking about this, Dave. We haven't had it. I'm just getting started.

That's temple. He's sick of talking about it because it tells people the truth about Trump. And that's how he makes his money. He needs to restart and do whatever he did again because there isn't a conversation about, hey, I learned my lesson. Hey, there's some mistake. I should have done something better. Absolutely not.

Absolutely not. When still, he's telling people to get boosted. You've got Trump derangement. He's an idiot. You're an idiot, Tim. You're an idiot. You've got no information. Journalists who don't like Donald Trump actually arguing with people over this. And they'll put things like, man, I really don't like Trump. But Operation Warp Speed was therapeutics and vaccines by choice. It was never forcing people to get medical treatments. And when that happened, he came out and said they shouldn't be doing this.

And now years later, I'm just like, dude, it's four years later. OK, I get it. So it was the election. You should never forget how bad those things were. But it's weird to me that we look at these blue state governors who literally murdered people in New York. And it's like, but Donald Trump, it funded scientific research. Can I just say something? Can I just say it goes back to the concept of revolution.

Laura Looney. I understand people have to provide for their families. And so I'm not trying to sound like a cold hearted bitch with what I'm about to say. But you do. You do. Everybody has choices. Everybody has free will. And I'm really sick and tired of listening to people say things like, oh, I would have

lost my job or, oh, well, you know, I would have been fired. You either stand for you either stand for something or you fall for everything. And if you either tell people that she has lied, she has made a profession out of deceiving people and sharing Donald Trump. And she has the audacity to say, well, you know, these other people, I took the vaccine because they had no integrity. They caved. These people are disgusting. Absolutely. That's the grifter gate, folks.

That's the issue with Tim Pool and these other fools that are out there. Yeah, it's not that there's some secret conspiracy with RT. They're lying to you, to your face. For the shekels. That's what they're getting. It's been pointed out that Lauren Chin has recently been trying to divide Donald Trump's base. See? There you go. This is what Zero Hedge is doing.

So you're either with Trump or you're with them. If you criticize anything that Trump did, it's because you've got Trump derangement syndrome. They've got a delusion a strong delusion and so uh tim pool says uh i as well as the other personalities and commentators were deceived and are victims and ends by telling haters to eat my and we'll just leave that blank um you know it's classy as always. Classy as always, Tim.

Laura Loomer says the real victims, you know, the people who've been killed, disabled by the shots that Trump rubber stamped and said we're going to do it without testing. Why? For his political gain. He put out untested stuff for his political gain. He established that as a precedent, just like he established gun control by executive order for his political gain. He created it. He chaired it. But the people who took it,

they deserve what they got. No sympathy at all from Laura Loomer. No justice. Bottom line, these people are making hundreds of thousands of dollars per episode just from this one outlet here that's why they will look you in the eye and lie to you just like Harry Mullis said about Fauci and the PCR test same thing just like the teen influencers just like alex jones at influence wars that's what that place should be called it's influence wars is and and they're silent about all of this stuff silent about this but they'll talk about the ccp agent that was there you know i just hope that people aren't going to follow trump into another january the sixth thing as i said yesterday he admitted finally trump admitted that he lost

and he's really kind of losing it you know actually told the truth and he gets it gets Megyn Kelly confused with Rosie O'Donnell Karen said I bet Megyn Kelly really hates being confused with Rosie O'Donnell you think you'll do in the debate coming up it's in a few days so I've done a lot of debating only as a politician I never debated my first debate was the Rosie O'Donnell debate written the famous Rosie O'Donnell debate, right? The famous Rosie O'Donnell debate, the answer. But I've done well with debates. I mean, I became president. The first debate was Megyn Kelly.

Millions more votes than I got the first time. I was told if I got 63 million, which is what I got the first time, you would win. You can't not win. And I got millions of more votes than that and uh lost by a whisker but and look what happened lost by whisker all of the wars and all of the problems yeah well you know you're lost by a whisker so what did you do you and alex jones created stop the steal and save america and you made millions of dollars, tens of millions. In this case, hundreds of millions of dollars. I don't know how much Alex made.

He made a lot. Lying to people. You lied to people. You lied them into January the 6th. And then you left them to twist in the wind. You abandoned them that day. And then you abandoned them to your political enemies because you knew you didn't win and because you knew they were going to be coming after you

lost by a whisker well let's hope that these people don't follow him again so again they've got two different worlds that they've created for people uh and they don't engage or explain anything it's kind of like what we see all the time what i've seen all the time when you are trying to evaluate christian truths and you got different denominations that have different doctrines and understandings of things and they'll have their proof texts right well this one says this and then the other group will say but mine says this and it's different and it's very rare that you'll find somebody that will try to reconcile these two things and say

well yes it says that but here's the context and why i think that that is actually an agreement with this over here most people don't do that most people just respond to truth text a over here out of context with true text truth text b over here out of context and say that's it you know i'm not and that's what is happening to the news now why because politics has become a religion and these people are straw man commentators. They have straw men that are out there. It's all about the money. All about the money. And the money comes first.

And the nudging and the manipulation will come later after they're hooked on the money. On Rumble. Marky Mark, New Jersey um thank you for the tip says the only thing you're doing wrong dave is to tell the truth you skewer everybody's sacred cows so you upset everybody i know i know uh people say i'm black pilled but you know what i can't swallow this stuff anymore i just can't swallow the lies of the dog they make me want to puke and i can't help but talk about this i've seen the lies of politics and i've seen what goes on at these media organizations i know a lot of these characters personally and i can't stomach it anymore i am sick and tired of it i couldn't do it for any amount of money. He says, since you don't get $400,000 on a podcast, I know.

I can't control myself. Doug Alug, thank you for the tip very much on Rockfin and on Rumble. Jim Z7 says, Pfizer loves Kelsey. Yes. He reaches the dummies who worship the NFL. Yeah, he got a lot of money for endorsing the jab, didn't he? Blood money, as far as I'm concerned. And I think it's blood money for the rest of this stuff as well.

We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back. They're doing what in the place they named after me? Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors. Making sense common again.

This is The David Knight Show. of these traders making sense common again this is the david knight show well we're talking about money let's talk a little bit more about what's happening with markets and interest rates and gold and all the rest of the stuff we had the dow jones fall yesterday by more than 600 points as um uh let's say that was on actually Tuesday afternoon. So this is a one day after, um, fell by 626 points, one half percent. And of course I've got a message yesterday. Since I have cash app, uh, they send me stuff about, uh, when Bitcoin, I'm getting stuff all the time, but Bitcoin is down by 5%. Bitcoin is up by 5%.

And I'm thinking about it. It's like, I'm sorry, I just can't handle putting a lot of money into an asset that's jumping up and down by five points every other day. You know, up one day by five points and down the next day by five points. Like I said, I can't ride that roller coaster. I'm too old for roller coasters, physical or financial, physical or fiscal, I should say, right? Why is gold moving lower? This is asked by Kitco. Despite the widespread expectation of the Fed cutting interest rates this month,

which will be inflationary and devaluing of the dollar, the precious metal continues to decline. Many traders are wondering why the sell-off is occurring. And again, don't worry about that as tony always says you have to look at this in terms of long term instead of pricing gold and dollars you need to price the real world in terms of gold and if you do that you see that it is wealth insurance you see that it is there as stable and now there's a whole new reason because when we look at the global id we look at the mark of the beast system you want to start

preparing now with skills to be outside of that system but also with some currency that's going to be outside that system and gold clicks that box the entire issue originated from the fed statement that they don't anticipate further weakness in the labor market why you know why would we believe any of the stuff that's coming out of them as everybody knows that they lie about every quarter about what the labor statistics are it's an outright lie and then they adjust it the next month so they give you an optimistic picture of the employment rate right or unemployment they make it look good and then three months later they're going to revise what they just told you today and what they just told you today they're going to say well that was that was optimistic that was too rosy. We moved it down. They moved it down nearly a record amount.

As Trump would say, a whisker of the biggest move, biggest lie that they've ever told before. Over 800,000 jobs just disappeared like that. Okay. And so people are like, oh, well, that shocked the stock market, other people. But Federal Reserve says, oh, that shocked the stock market other people but federal reserve says oh we think the labor market is still good they did that so they can make the current figures look better right oh look our trend is now up since we lowered the numbers from three months ago by eight hundred thousand dollars this is making speculators believe that if the weakness continues especially given the way that we have two important readings due this week

with respect to the labor market, that the Fed may take some unprecedented steps and announce a higher rate cut. But if we look at the yearly gain for gold, it is still quite decent. This has led traders to believe that it's time for some of them to take some profits and sell. Finally, the strength of the dollar index is largely due to the traders

in the forex foreign exchange market being highly concerned about the decline in the Japanese yen. So again, not so much the dollar versus gold, but it's also the dollar versus other currencies that are out there. So where do some of these people think it's going to go? And this doesn't mean that it's going to go there, but it's just kind of a general consensus. And of course, consensus can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

If the central banks all think that gold is the thing to have because it's going to be stable or because it's going to go up in value because their fiat currencies are going to go down, well, that's a self-fulfilling prophecy right there. If you've got other people who are doing this you've got the world gold councils joe cavatoni says he thinks it's going to be somewhere soon it'll be somewhere between twenty seven hundred and three thousand dollars uh you've got um goldman sachs saying the same thing essentially they're saying it's going to hit 2700 in early 2025 that's not even a big reach anymore considering how much it has already gone up the last few years and considering the

economic uncertainty that we have here but again this was republished uh just yesterday this is something that they initially put up in april of year. It was an interview that Peter Schiff had with Patrick Bet-David. And Peter Schiff said he thinks that gold is going to go to $10,000 to $20,000 an ounce. Well, I think that is not realistic, frankly. And the reason that he's saying that, I went through this thing. Why is he saying it? This is really, um, and the, and the guy says, this is not the first time he said it either in this interview.

Um, the reason he's saying it is not because of, well, in a sense, because of financial collapse, he thinks that the system may be ready to go back to a gold standard. And if we went back to a gold standard, then he said the system may be ready to go back to a gold standard. And if we went back to a gold standard, then he said the price could be $10,000 to $60,000 an ounce. But I don't think we're ever going to go back to a gold standard. They're always going to have some kind of a fiat currency. Even if they go to a central bank digital currency or something like that,

it's still going to be essentially a fiat currency, but it'll have all the controls and surveillance of a CBDC, but it'll be based on proof of, uh, excuse me, proof of stake, proof of stake rather than proof of work. And proof of stake means it's this value because that's what i say it is it's fiat currency

yeah we own this thing right and i'm going to tell you because i own it i'm going to tell you what the value is as opposed to somebody honestly doing you know having some constraint in terms like like a bitcoin where they have to mine it know, just like you have to physically mine gold. Well, they have to do some work to do Bitcoin. And you have a limit to the number of these things and it gets more harder and harder to make it. So there's inherent in its structure. There are some controlling things, whereas these other people, they just say, well, we just want to have proof of stake. I'm the stakeholder. This is what I say it's worth. I don't think they're going to go to gold as a standard there

he says um we know not that there is a plan to go to a gold standard that is in place uh if that happens the only way that i see that happening is if we get into some kind of hyperinflation. Um, and again, um, you know, there'll be printing trillion dollar pieces of paper or trillion dollar coins or something, if that were to happen. Um, and he said, and if that were, if, you know, plan to go to a gold back dollar is there. And, uh, so, uh, but I would not count on that. What I would count on is that we're going to have a lot of inflation, and we're going to have stagflation or dragflation, as Gerald Slenty pointed out. And we're also going to have something that we've never seen before,

and that is the push to get people involved in this surveillance mark of the beast currency, the CBDC, central bank digital currency. And so to me, that is a big, big part of the reason that you want to have gold. Have something that is private, that is out of sight to them, out of their reach, perhaps, depending on how you store it. And so to me, that is the biggest reason to accumulate it. But we're also in some very uncertain economic times, which would make a currency an unstable storage of your wealth,

whereas gold will be. That's the bottom line. David and I die gold to take you to Tony Ardaban, and you can get gold, silver, small or large amounts. Tony is not with us today. He is on the road traveling. But you can become a member of Wolfpack. He's set up something different tiers from $35, $50 on up. And you can, each month, you can set aside a little bit of gold or silver. And as part of a buying group, you can get a group discount there at DavidKnight.Gold.

And it's Tony Ardman's Wise Wolf Gold. A great guy to deal with. I've known him for a very long time. And this is a great time to start making some moves outside of the system that we all know is about to collapse tiktokers now left a massive debt after they tried to explore exploit a chase bank uh glitch that was there they call it an infinite money glitch and they put up tiktok videos showing themselves going to i mean this is how stupid people are this is on wine press news but it's a lot of things. You can see this on social media. People actually doing it.

Travis is laughing. My other son was laughing about it. It's like, watch this. I'm going to commit. I'm going to commit bank fraud and I'm going to film myself doing it. So they're taking out like a hundred million dollars and, you know, just are whatever they can get out of these machines the one person took a shot of their bank account so they had a negative balance of minus 99 million 999 999 type of thing but um yeah they take pictures and put them up on social media of them committing crimes like that

and my and whistler said well they've been able to walk into all these retailers in california and just take whatever they want so i guess they figured crime's not got no consequences yet and it's like okay well we can uh if we can loot stores i guess we can rob banks too well now they're dealing with a different group of people they're gonna find out that keeps the sinaloa cartels money because they're not gonna be happy about that that's right yeah i know that was uh that's the hsbc but of course uh chase bank and jp morgan they're gonna they've always been around with the mob but um so yeah these people took pictures themselves you know you're gonna do stupid stuff and you're gonna find out what's going on with this the unlimited money glitch

which is really nothing other than check cashing fraud they wrote checks for things they didn't have put it into the machine and then withdrew the money well it gave them a credit temporarily and they realized that with that temporary credit they could withdraw money and they did it real quickly see the only people that can do that kind of stuff is a government it's called currency they just did that to a large extent but uh as i said you know when we look at the collapse of the dollar and financial system we have turkey has now applied to join bricks you see a lot of moves like this and this is about geopolitics um you saw i didn't uh spend time on it but you've probably seen they had some u.s marines that were on leave in turkey and they

were attacked by a mob and they said you got blood on your hands and they were angry i think about what's going on in israel and and you know they uh see the u.s as allies of israel so they attacked these marines on the street and um they attack one guy about five guys around him put a sack over his head and then just before the video ends you see another marine coming and punching it's like okay maybe you guys bit off a little bit more than you could chew they wound up having i think seven marines and then 15 of these guys there uh and um then eventually they arrested a sailor as well so there's a lot of anger and animosity and of course the u.s was there in a joint exercise with turkey but these are people on the street. Meanwhile, the government of Turkey is upset about the fact that they're being kept out of, you know, they're in NATO,

but they're being kept out of, I think, some of the European Union things. And so they're making moves towards the kremlin this is all about the sanctions we're all about geopolitics as well and sanctions were really started to kick the dollar down the hill we're going to take a quick break and when we come back we're going to talk about some of these people who are looking at the considerations as to who we should vote for because we've had some interesting things that some people have really nailed it other people have missed it by a mile we'll be right back © transcript Emily Beynon Thank you. Analyzing the globalist's next move. And now, The David Knight Show.

With bad and worse options, how should Christians think about voting in this climate? This is being asked by a lot of different Christian publications. They're all weighing in on this issue. And I've got to say, most of them got it wrong, in my opinion. And I'll tell you why I think that. I think they got it wrong because I think it depends on what you think about Christ. If you are a Christian, what do you think about Christ? Do you trust him with the consequences if you do the right thing?

Or are you kind of getting tired of this and you want to take care of it yourself? And you've got a better idea. I think that I can fix it. So let's just forget about the principles. And if these people betray principles, we'll just say they're playing 40 chess or something like that. We can just move it along that way. Right. You know,

I think we had a lot of people. Jason Barker always comes to mind. He wrote me a long letter. I haven't passed on yet to you, but talking about the different things that happened as he was facing being kicked out of the military because he wasn't going to take the jab and how ultimately god worked this out for him and i've had people tell me that uh over and over again through emails through letters i've had people that i've met personally who have told me that, and none of them have any regret.

They went through a difficult time, but they look at what has happened to some of the people who were browbeat into doing this and were injured or killed. And in many cases, people came out of this on the other side blessed way more than they were before that insurance agent that we have. He had a job that he was making over $300,000 a year. And his parents thought he was absolutely crazy to get out of it because he was not going to take the jab. And like, you take the jab or you leave they said i'm leaving and um he set up his own insurance company uh as an agent right he's an insurance agent he's not an insurance company but um you know it's an agency that he's working for it's very big paying him a big salary and he just started working for himself and he's making more money now than he did before so um what do we do about the election and so this one person says so do we just sit it out do we punish the gop for its spinelessness and watch the democrats dance on

the ashes of our liberties and our country and our family see this is the false dichotomy that they always give you this is hegelian thinking and um they put you in this box they tell you that you've only got two choices and you believe them these are the same people who demand to define the terms that we refer to everything as right these are the people who no, you're not pro-life. You're anti-abortion rights. Oh, okay. You're now going to be the red team, when red always was a communist. So the communists now in America are going to wear blue,

and you're going to wear red caps and call yourself red states and all the rest of this stuff. Oh, okay. Okay. And you've only got two choices the only thing you can do to keep your you know you can either sit there and contemplate your naval and do absolutely nothing or you can hold your nose and vote for trump or else the democrats are going to control the country well that's a lie that's a lie those are not your options don't let them

put you in that box see the purpose of the election and what these people don't understand is that the election is to distract you from the things that you can do that really would make a difference they don't want you doing those things. They want you focused on the fantasy. They want you focused on the pageant. They want you focused on the presidency. This is the talking about Lala Harris. This person goes on to say, this is the same woman who with a straight face claims to stand for justice while championing policies

that butcher the unborn and muzzle dissent okay well this is a woman who we all know that's what she is she comes at you straight away and flying her flag wearing her Maoist costume and wearing her Maoist policies all over her like a NASCAR driver and his corporate sponsors. Or you can have the guy who is incognito and subtle, secret, covert. He does things like gun control by executive order, and he does it with something that nobody cares about, bump stock, so he can establish a precedent to do gun control by executive order. Then he moves to the pistol brace. Then he pulls it off when the NRA finally complains about it, and then Biden puts it in.

But, of course, when he did it with the bump stock, Lala said, well, I'll do that myself. But there's other ways to fight that. We had people who fought the pistol brace at the state level. We had people who removed the bump stock at the Supreme Court. See, I happen to think that's more dangerous to have somebody who is sneaky and subtle and covert and lying to your face. I think that's more dangerous. Quite frankly, I think it's more satanic, right? Satan was the most subtle of them all, right?

I'm talking about the joy of living in a country where you can still proclaim the gospel freely, says this person. You know, you've got to vote for Trump so this will happen. Well, I don't know that Trump would defend that. So many things that you would think that he would have defended as a relabeled New York Democrat who now calls himself a Republican. But I don't know that he would make a difference with any of that stuff. But you could. If you paid any attention to what was happening in 2020,

you know that all politics is local. You can make a difference with that. He says, here's a hard truth. Our vote is not just a political action. It's a moral one. Now I agree with him. Now I agree with him. So it's about who you trust, isn't it?

That's the real moral thing. It's not about which policies you agree with or whatever else. It's who who you trust isn't it that's the real moral thing it's not about which policies you agree with or whatever else it's who do you trust are you going to trust christ are you going to say i know and he does he goes through all this stuff he goes yeah i know that trump's bad and his policies have been bad. But she's even worse. Well, you know what's right and wrong. And you can either do what's wrong or you can do what's right and leave the consequences to God. As I said before when I was talking about homeschooling, isn't it amazing that God has kept that door open

with everything else that's going on? He's left that door open for you to raise your family, for you to protect your children for you to train them up in the way they should go but you know um we've got to have trump to do that right no now you got to do it yourself the important stuff you have to do. And if you abdicate that, it's really a question of who do you trust. And who you trust is who you're looking to as your savior. It's just that simple. You have to do what is right. As I said before, when we talk about people who had religious objections to the vaccines,

or even if they had a medical objection to the vaccine, or a constitutional objection to the vaccines, or even if they had a medical objection to the vaccine or a constitutional objection to the vaccine. Do the right thing. Leave the consequences up to God. And yet, I'm seeing this one place after the other. Here is a guy who is talking about, this was put out by Gateway Pundit, Trump supporters,

says this is a must watch. A popular Christian YouTuber. Hmm, okay. I'm sure that, go back and look, I wonder what this guy was saying during the vaccine stuff, right? I'm sure that, uh, go back and look, I wonder what this guy was saying during the vaccine stuff, right?

He's, he's got a real large following on YouTube. I don't know. Um, but anyway, his name is Alan par and he drops powerful video explaining why every believer should vote for Trump and Republican candidates. What does it mean to believe? You know, it's really about trust, right? Who do you trust? Who do you trust to take care of you? Well, you'll find out if you put your trust in a politician. Here's what he has to say, though. He doesn't think that character really matters. But before we get into such a triggering issue for some, I really, really need to lay down

some ground rules and some disclaimers first for a video like this. First and foremost, no political party is perfect. Neither of them reflect a perfect biblical worldview. We need to make that very, very clear because some people may say, well, if you vote this way, then they're not perfect. And what about this? And what about that? Listen, neither party is perfect. Both parties are flawed. Nobody ever said otherwise. The second disclaimer is that neither person or neither candidate running for president is perfect. And for that reason, I know this is going to make some of you very, very angry, but I am not going to deal with the character of either candidate, although that is a major issue and that is something that needs to be taken into consideration. And the reason why is because I personally believe that when you vote, you're not just voting for one person.

You're voting for potentially hundreds, maybe even thousands of people. Yeah, right. OK, so you notice the circular logic with that? Okay. First of all, political parties. No party is perfect. Well, nobody ever said anything about having a perfect political party. Nobody.

That's never been an aspect of it. No party is perfect. And then character doesn't matter. Because you're not just voting for one person. You're voting for the party. So now we've looped back to number one, circular logic here. Let's, let's come back, circle back up there. So you're not voting for a person. So forget about the character stuff. He goes, now I know that that's important,

but we're not going to talk about that here. And I'm not taking that into consideration when I talk about it. Well, if it's important, then why wouldn't you talk about it? You need to do something better than just point back to the party. Trust the party. It's just amazing to me. It's kind of what you hear from people all the time. Well, you know, I don't like abortion. Abortion needs to be stopped.

But, you know, in a perfect world, we wouldn't have any abortion. But since we don't live in a perfect world, people are going to have to have abortion. I just want to make it rare and safe. And now they want to worship it, right? Or they say the same thing. I really love the Second Amendment. Second Amendment is great, but we've got to take your guns. Character is wonderful, but it doesn't matter.

It's really important, but character doesn't matter. Look, perfection is not the issue. Here's what the issue is. The issue is principle. The issue is policy. The issue is prevarication. Let's just make three Ps out of it, right? Isn't that easy to remember ppp payroll protection plan or the private public partnership well we got another ppp principle policy and prevarication if you don't have principles you're not going to have the right policies and if you're going to prevaricate about this stuff we can't believe anything you say about your policy either can we right if you're gonna lie to me about everything because you got no character like trump and lala these people are all over the place both of them two of the biggest chameleons and liars i've ever seen in my life

and i've been watching politics a long time they lie about everything and so what difference does it make what their policies are the rest of his video is irrelevant because now he's going to fine-tune well you know this is a little bit better than that no if you're going to discount character then you got nothing to stand on you have nothing no reason to believe anything that they say about anything. So Gateway Pundit says, for par, supporting a pro-abortion candidate should be a moral deal breaker for Christians. Well, again, we could argue about

which one supports abortion more and which one has a more dangerous approach. But still, how did we stop abortion? How did we stop abortion? We stopped it locally. Didn't we? This is why, uh, this is the only strategy that's ever worked. And this is why it was so important for Dobbs to come in and say, we're not going to determine this at the national level. And then immediately you've got a lot of national abortion, uh,

a lot of pro-life groups, as well as pro-abortion groups that want to bring it back nationally. Okay, so the Supreme Court's not going to do it. So let's let Congress and the president bring it back to the federal government. No, we actually saved lives by making it at the state level and again you know some of the people say well okay the number of abortions went from 60 000 in tennessee and texas to less than 50 in one year uh and uh so is that a win i think so now they will say um we are going to um um we've actually some of these places will say well actually there's more total abortions uh that have happened uh this year because um you know people are going to other places to have it done actually more of it is being done by the abortion pill which is

being made readily available there is something that the federal government could do about that uh as long as they got the fda around fda around As long as they got the FDA around, as long as they got the post office around, there's something they could do about that. And that really would help women's health because letting them just be able to do this without seeing a doctor who is going to look at the size of the baby

and other aspects, that presents a real threat to the mother's health. So they're not worried about women's health if they're going to let them take the abortion pill without a medical exam. So there are things like that that could be done. But look, that's primarily local. And that's how we've had success.

And that was going to be the approach when Roe v. Wade came out. You had a lot of, after Roe v. Wade was done in 1973, you had a lot of conservatives say, this is a violation of, after Roe v. Wade was done in 1973, you had a lot of conservatives say, this is a violation of the 10th Amendment, and it was. And that's eventually what, I said that all through this, that, you know, 10th Amendment nullifies Roe v. Wade. Roe v. Wade is not the law of the land, the 10th Amendment is. Finally, in the Dobbs decision, the Supreme Court said, the 10th Amendment doesn't allow us to do this but the constitution was on the side of

stopping roe v wade from the very beginning and there was already a movement to do that after the supreme court decision 1973 and they were putting that uh there was building momentum and then the moral majority got behind ronald reagan said, we're going to do it with Ronald. He'll pack the Supreme Court and they'll undo Roe v. Wade rather than having a nullification fight. In other words, the people who wanted marijuana, medical and recreational, put up more of a fight than the Christians who said they wanted to protect babies from abortion. They were willing to have that fight. They're willing to nullify it at the state level but the um the conservatives weren't willing to do that for the babies let's take the easy way we'll put reagan in and he'll appoint supreme court justices like sandra day o'Connor who went the other way or the others that he put in there.

And so they thought that Reagan was God and he's going to give them everything that they want rather than doing the hard work themselves and protecting babies by nullifying this federal overreach at the state level. That's the way we protect our families. That's the way we protect our families. That's the way we protect life. That's what they don't want you doing. They want you focused on national politics. And so he's got a table here. If you can pull this up, Travis. This is the Gateway Pundit.

And this is what Alan Parr put up. So he's got Democrat and Republican, National Party Politics. And he's got Democrat and Republican, National Party politics. And he's got these things there. Redefining the family. Transitioning kids. Religious freedom. Abortion.

School choice. Judges. Moral issues and so forth, right? And so, look, it's really clear. You got to vote Republican all the way down the line. Well, let's make it a little bit more interesting. Let's put in some issues like lockdown. Let's put in medical murder and martial law, but murder through the ventilators and the vaccines.

Well, I don't see a difference between the two parties on those two things. Do you? you a difference between the two parties on those two things do you i see on these vital issues like lockdown medical martial law medical bioweapon murder or murder by ventilator i see that they're both for that war wars what about wars i see they're both for wars how about violating the constitution how about civil asset forfeiture how How about these types of things that violate, surveilling us, the TSA, all the rest of these things. Are both of them on that side? How about debt slavery? I think Republicans and Democrats are in the same position.

How about Mark of the Beast, CBDC? Well, you've got some Republicans who have taken the side of cryptocurrency, but they don't really, I don't trust them on Mark of the Beast either. And so when it comes to some of these other issues, so on those issues, I think those are pretty vital. We're talking about mass murder and depopulation. We're talking about locking us down and enslaving us. We're talking about violating the Constitution that they swore to uphold,

I think those are some pretty important issues. When you talk about debt slavery by adding trillions of dollars a year, conditioning people for universal basic income, I think those are pretty big issues. And there's no difference between the feds on that and the two different parties. But it all comes out to the definition of a family let me ask you this do you want the family defined by some politicians in washington no i'm sorry i don't think the republican party is up to that i don't think they should be defining marriage and

i don't think they should be defining the family and we don't need to have their permission to reject the pronouns we don't need to have their permission to reject the pronouns. We don't need to have their permission to stop the mutilation of minors. We don't need to have their permission to stop gender gaslighting. It isn't going to happen, by the way, if we trust it to Washington to get done. If we want the National Republican Party to do that, to save the family for us, guess what? family's going to be lost like all the other things that we entrusted to the national republican party the transitioning of children the redefining of the family how about religious freedom what have the republicans done

for you lately when it comes to censorship and other things like that zero zip nada they did nothing at all when we go back to 2018 where they started mass purges on social media did they do anything no they didn't do anything about that and then when it comes to abortion i already talked about that when we really stopped abortion we stopped it in the states now we're still doing still doing it in New York and California and other places like that. You're going to stop them with a federal law? No, because you don't have the constitutional authority to stop them. It's just like drug prohibition. I don't like drug prohibition.

I don't like the murder of babies. But these are state issues. And if the state government wants people taking drugs and murdering babies they will stand in the way because the federal government is not the purpose of the federal government is not to do law enforcement and when they do that they do it really poorly when it comes to school choice what does that mean does that mean the government subsidizing private schools what about? How has that worked out for you? And then again, moral issues. Why in the world would anybody listen to some YouTuber who has a massive audience? Why? Because Google approves of what he says? And what he says is that Republicans are going to define moral

issues for you. See, I don't have my moral issues defined for me by any political party or any politician. They're defined in the Bible. And so, if you want to do something about this, you have to fight this locally. All politics is local. And you have to fight it in your own family because the movies and the media and the schools and everything are going to be fighting against your family, trying to capture them everywhere. That's where your fight is, folks.

We don't wrestle against Democrats or Republicans. We wrestle against principalities and powers. And we have to take these thoughts captive here. You know, it truly is amazing. It's, what about your character? Right? The character of the politicians doesn't matter, he says. But what about your character?

What's your character based on? Michael Brown says, can a vote for trump be morally justified he says in my 2020 book he said evangelical is called evangelicals of the crossroads will we pass the trump test he said i devoted an entire chapter to the question does character still count does morality still matter well this guy thinks that character doesn't count and that the National Republican Party can fix our morality. This previous guy, I even forgot his name now. And he says, back in 1998, in response, this is Michael Brown now, back in 1998, in response to the candidacy of Bill Clinton, the Southern Baptist Convention drafted a resolution

in which it was stated clearly that, quote, moral character matters to God and should matter to all citizens, especially God's people, when choosing public leaders. They said that when the Democrat Bill Clinton was running. With his obvious moral failings, with a long list of women that Hillary Clinton called bimbos,

who had alleged violent sexual misconduct and rape against Bill Clinton. And again, at the time, I saw liberals just say, that doesn't matter. It's like, really? You're supposed to be a defender of women? You say that women's rights matter and you just don't care about this kind of stuff? And the conservatives and the Southern Baptists

were saying, tsk, tsk, look at the character that they are. And now it's been turned, hasn't it? And now we see the conservatives and many Southern Baptist leaders supporting Trump, a fellow party member, moral purity, and the highest character. And so Michael Brown says, so how do we reconcile this with our support for Trump? And I write this as a two-time voter for Trump. He says, does he, although imperfect, demonstrate consistent honesty, moral purity, and the highest character?

That's laughable. And he writes, hardly. So how then can we justify our vote for him? That's why all these conservative Christians are twisting themselves into pretzels, trying to explain how you can support that. He said, many have answered, we're electing a president, not a pastor or a priest. We're voting for a commander in chief, not a spiritual spiritual leader i've heard the argument well we're voting for if i got a plumber out there i don't ask him if he's faithful to his wife or any of this other kind of

stuff it's like okay but if this guy is a if he is a bona fide criminal how do you know that he even fixed what you paid him to do or that he did it and he didn't do shortcuts the things that are going to blow up after he leaves or whatever i mean come on character matters for anything but is this how we felt in the days before trump did we use this same reasoning when clinton was running for president weren't we saying that character counted morality mattered and haven't we been known as values voters? What values would those be? Didn't we once call ourselves the moral majority, he says. The Southern Baptist Convention Resolution stated, quote,

tolerance of serious wrong by leaders, such as depopulation shots, medical martial law, destroying businesses, destroying jobs, destroying people's lives killing them disabling them is that something that is a wrong i mean we're not even talking about what's going on with bill clinton behind closed doors with women we're talking about what trump did out front to everybody he put a kill shot around the world how is that not character who paid him off do you care now you don't even care about the crime let alone investigating it so he says they said at the time that tolerance of serious wrong by leaders sears the conscience of the

culture it spawns unrestrained immorality and lawlessness in society, and it will surely result in God's judgment. Do we still believe that today? Or have we got our consciences, have they become totally seared by Trump? I think they have, quite frankly. That's a rhetorical question for Michael Brown. I'm telling you it's true. The resolution also affirmed, quote, the moral character matters to God and should matter to all citizens, especially God's people, when choosing public leaders.

Unquote. But today, when concerned, Christians point to Trump's questionable morality. They're called legalists. They're called short-sighted. They're called religious. They're called, as I was called just two days ago, you're one of these purity guys. You are just so narrowly focused, you can't see what's important.

That's why we have the kind of country we have today. No moral convictions. Everybody's playing this 40 chess game that Alex Jones was alluding to. What a deception that is. The book of Proverbs warns us about the deadly power of the tongue, about the damage a fool can do through his or her words. Fool refers to somebody who's morally bankrupt rather than somebody who is intellectually challenged.

The last thing a nation wants is a fool for president or king. That would be somebody who defies God. Why then would we vote for trump when pressed further on the issue the answer would sound something like this we still believe the character counts morality matters but things have become so extreme in america blah blah blah and you know what this is now he falls back he lays out think now he falls back into his agalian box well here we are. We've only got two things that we can do. There's nothing I can do at the local level.

There's nothing I can do as an individual or as a father or as a parent. We're just going to have to, the only fix that we got for our society is to vote for Trump or Lala Harris. That's pretty clear, isn't it? Well, this is where you are if you think like that. When politics becomes your religion. Robin Schumacher nailed it. It starts with a quote from C.S. Lewis. He says, C.S. Lewis, in a book written over 80 years ago, The Screwtape Letters,

talked about the dangers of letting politics become your religion. Lewis put the following words in the mouth of his professional devil uncle, who was instructing a nephew on how to wreck his human target he said let your patient begin by treating patriotism or pacifism as part of his religion then let him under the influence of partisan spirit come to regard it as the most important part then quietly and gradually nurse him on to the stage of which the religion becomes merely a part of the cause in which christianity is valued chiefly because of the excellent arguments that it can produce this is where we are so many of the people who talk about christian nationalism with a reawaken america people with people like michael flynn means other people even richard dawkins is there well you know why i don't like islam in the uk so

uh i really like some of the fruit of christianity i just don't like the tree so let's cut down the trees and keep the fruit how long will that last and our society the moral aspects of our society have become like a cut flower and it's been in the base long enough that all the petals are falling off now we can all pretty much see that it's dead can't we too many professing christians on both sides of political aisle seem to be convinced that they're in the midst of a human life and death global existential battle and if the other side god forbid wins the result will be certain cataclysmic destruction on a national level sovereignty of god be darned he says

put it nicely from maga and conservative disciples on the right the liberal social justice warriors on the left there's no denying that shrieking quasi-religious political activism is everywhere cultural commentators debate on why it seems to be so severe and growing some say the ideological social media news echo chambers have cordoned us off into warring factions that is true so i was talking about earlier or the others point to a growing spiritual emptiness inside of people that they then try to feed with politics that is also true you can feed it with politics the power side of things yeah power can be you can make an idol out of power even if you don't have it just like you can make an idol out of power even if you don't have it just

like you can make an idol out of money even if you don't have it you can make an idol out of sex if you don't have it either right or you can indulge yourself in any and all of those things and make idols out of them to them political conventions can have an identical vibe to a raucous and joyous church worship a candidate's inspiring speech worms the heart just like a fiery evangel evangelists uh and they dole out the funds to the political campaigns like they drop the money into the bucket of the church i just saw a thing from a mega church pastor and his whole thing was don't criticize these churches of 40 50 000 people you know uh if you do if you ever go to a concert if you ever go to a football game or anything

well then you're just a hypocrite because you're going to these big things these big events anyway and it's like well wait a minute wait a minute wait a minute um I don't go to a concert, a live concert, thinking that I'm going to have a relationship with the other people in the audience. I've got a one-to-one relationship with this performance. Are you saying that's what you're doing at the megachurch? Because I'm saying that's what you're doing. Same thing is true of the football.

I don't go to a football game thinking I'm going to get on the field participating. And yet, it is a spectator sport when we go to these football game thinking i'm going to get on the field participating and yet uh it is a spectator sport we go to these mega churches to most of the churches most of them you're not actually a participant in it um so again the the best experiences i've ever had have been uh uh, local, a neighborhood Bible study, uh, that we'd meet in, in the house. That was the best that we had.

That was not a mega church experience. It was not a, uh, a mega concert experience. It was not a political event. It wasn't a MAGA political rally either. Uh, whether religious or political sectarianism is about two hostile identity

groups who not only clash over policy and ideology, but who see the other side as alien and immoral. Writes Nate Cohn of the New York Times, it's still the antagonistic feelings between the groups more than the differences over ideas that drive sectarian conflict. See, this is the path to civil war. We get to the point where it's more important for us to own the other people than for us to try to fix a problem. Even if we disagree on problems, we don't want to talk about the issues. We just want to own that other guy. We don't want to debate any issues. We want to shut down any debate. Since there's any debate, we want to own those other people. Two things have typically occurred inside a person when this type of thing happens. Number one, the primary object of deliverance from societal problems is the government,

not the creator. People are tired of waiting on God to make things right. Isn't that what I said at the beginning? So I said, I think this guy got it exactly i agree with him anyway uh number two scripture has been discarded as absolute truth and moral authority even character doesn't count as you heard that so-called christian influencer when cultural values clash with the bible the culture wins when you add politics to your relationship with God and that's a new Christian nationalism you mix these two things

together guess what you wind up with politics listen to what historian Antonia trip trip elitist had to say about the Roman world he said the general populace no longer placed its hope or faith on the ancient gods whom they believed could not alleviate their daily encounters with the vicissitudes of hellenistic life this is a period of general material and moral insecurity uh let's let's let this go i'm almost finished with this okay pause that for a second um the unsettling conditions of the time led people so long uh rather led people to long and to search for salvation a release from the burdens of finitude the misery and the failure of human life people everywhere were keenly aware to every new message of hope and eagerly prospecting for a personal savior someone who would bring

salvation deliverance or protection from the vicissitudes of this life he says that sound familiar and so he said ask yourself some questions about this that's why i wanted to extend this just just briefly here's about five questions do i find myself witnessing more about Biden, Lala Harris, Donald Trump, et cetera, than I do about Jesus Christ? Do I feel the country is doomed more if the wrong people are elected versus if the nation rejects God and his truth?

If the wrong people are elected, is that a bigger risk to your nation than if we turn our back on God? Do I view those opposing political side as enemies versus people to be listened to and one for Christ? Do I enjoy thinking about the defeat of my political opponents? Oh, yeah, we got to collect the tears of those liberals and make them wail, and we got to own them and all the rest of the stuff. I am sick of that, frankly. I am so sick of that. When I imagine how God's higher purposes can be accomplished, do my thoughts immediately turn to

political parties and to politicians? Are my political views, practically speaking, a key aspect of my identity? Do I think that God is on my side politically and opposed to those who disagree with me? If so, you may have already been captured by the enemy. Screwtape describes this to his disciples. He says, once you have made the world an end and faith as a means, you've almost won. And it makes very little difference what kind of worldly end your man is pursuing. Provided that meetings and pamphlets and policies and movements and causes and crusades matter more to him than prayers and sacraments and charity

well then he is ours because the battle is spiritual it's not political you have uh you have a choice that you can make and the ballot box doesn't matter. Not at the federal level. It does at the local level. And they don't want you to make a difference. Thank you for joining us. The common man. They created common core to dumb down our children. They created common past to track and control us. Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing. And the communist future.

They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary. But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com. Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you.